रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/ 2003-05
REGD. NO . D. L. (N ) 04 /0007 / 2003-05
सत्यमेव जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 38]
नई दिल्ली , सितम्बर 12 सितम्बर 18 , 2010 , शनिवार / भाद्र 21 - भाद्र 27 , 1932 NEW DELHI , SEPTEMBER 12- SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 , SATURDAY / BHADRA 21 - BHADRA 27 , 1932 No. 38 ]
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड -उप - खण्ड ( ii ) PART II -Section 3-Sub - section (ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence )
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 6 सितम्बर , 2010
का.आ. 2297. केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा अपराध प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 कीउप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा संस्थापित मामलों तथा अपीलीय /पुनरीक्षण या विधि द्वारा किसी भी राज्य या संघ शासित क्षेत्र जिसके संबंध में उपर्युक्त धारा के उपबंध लागू होते हों , स्थापित न्यायालयों में पुनरीक्षण या अपीलीय मामलों से उद्भूत अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के लिए श्री एस.सी. मीणा , अभियोजन अधिकारी को विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 225/32/2010- एवीडी- II ]
मुकेश चतुर्वेदी, उप सचिव 3484 G1 /2010
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training ) New Delhi , the 6th September , 2010 S.O. 2297. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri S.C. Meena , Prosecuting Officer of the Central Bureau of Investigation as Special Public Prosecuter for conducting cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment ( CBI ) in trial courts and appeals , revisions or other matters arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts , established by law in any State or Union Territory to which provisions of the aforesaid section apply .
[F. No. 225 / 32 /2010 - AVD - II ]
MUKESH CHATURVEDI , Dy . Se
(6145) 146
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
CORRIGENDUM कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जयपुर , 6 सितम्बर , 2010
Jaipur , the 6th September , 2010 सं. 10/2010-11
S.O. 2299.-In Notification No. 07/ 2010-11 dated 20-08-2010 vide which " Defence Public School , Jaipur " was approved for the purpose of sub - clause ( vi ) of clause (23C) ofSection 10 of the Income - tax Act, 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income - tax Rules , 1962 in Para 1, line 3 name of the samiti may be read as " Shri K.B.L. Sharma Memorial Education and Cultural Society, Jaipur " instead of " Defence Public School , Jaipur "
[No. CCIT/JPR/ Addl.CIT ( Hqrs . )/ 10 ( 23C )( vi )/ 2010-11 /2009 ] MUKESH BHANTI , Chief Commissioner of Income- tax
वित्त मंत्रालय
का.आ. 2292. आयकर नियम, 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के काथ भजनोथ आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 2 ) सौ की उपधारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-10 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " हरोड जेवियर एजुकेशनल सोसायटी , रोग, जिला - अलवर " को अवीकृति देते बातें कि समिति आयाम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी तु को साथ गत आयकर नियम , 1961 की घार 10 के उप - खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उपधाद के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्यकारी
(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ;
नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर , 2010 মুজদা ) ( +1 )/ 2010-11 /2008 ] भुकेश भान्नी, मुख्य आथका आयुक्त
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAN
Raper , the beptember , 2010
No. 10 / 2010-18
का.आ. अधिनियम , 2300-भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ( अनुषर्गः बैंक) 1959 ( 1959 का 38 ) की घाव 26 को स (2क ) के साथ पठित धारा 25 की उपधाखण्ड द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कन्द्रीय भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से , श्री गुरुनाश 9-7-1954 ) , प्रबन्धक , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर को अधिन तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा सं बैंक के अधिकारी कर्मचारी बने रहने तक अथवा अगले से जो भी सबसे पहले हो , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर यो निर्देशक मंडल म अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।
[ फा. सं. 3/2/20101 S.O. 1295.- Ines roise of tite powers conferred by sub- chus ( ve ) of clause (23 ) Senice 10 of the income Tax Act, 1961 (4 ) of 1961 read with cole CA of the Income- sax Rules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of thcorne -tax. Jaipur hereby approves "Behror Xavier educational Society, Behrur, Diarz - Alwar " for the perposes said section for Shu A. Y 2009.10 and onwards.
सुमिता डावरी, ले
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services ) Provited that the society comins to and complies with the provisions of so clause ) of clause ( 23C ) of sectson 10 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 read with rule 2CA of the thumbae- tax Rules , 1962
New Delhi , the 7th September , 2010 ING COITSPR / Addi.CITO Aas . )/ 10( 23C ) ( vi ) /2010-11 /2008 ] MUKES / EUHANTI . Chief Commissioner of Income - tax
शुद्धि -पत्र
जयपुर , 5 सितम्बर , 2010
S.O. 2300 .-- In exercise of the powers contered by clause (cb ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 25 read with sub- section ( 2A) of Section 26 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks ) Act , 1959 ( 38 of 1959 ) , The Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri Gururaja Rao ( DoB : 9-7- 1954 ) , Manager , State Bank of Mysore ,as Officer Employee Director on the Board of Directors of State Bank of Mysore for a period of three years from the date ofnotification or until he ceases to be an Officer of the State Bank of Mysore or until further orders , whichever is the earliest.
का.आ 2209 आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के माण्ड ( 23 सी ) को उपखण्ड ( अप ) के तहत् अधिसूचना 2. 07/2010-1: दिनांक 20-8-2010 कं द्वारा डिफेन्स पब्लिक स्कूल, जयपुर पर्न स्वीकृति दी गई थी । अधिसूचना के पैरा । की साइन 4 में मिलभ स्कूल , जयपुर के स्थान पर " श्री के. बी. एन. शमा मेण्ड कल्चरल सोसायटी , जयपुर " पढ़ा जाये ।
[ F. No. 3 /2/ 2010 - BO - 1 ] কমলা मु /जय/10 ( 23 सो ) ( vi )/2010-11/2009 ]
SUMITA DAWRA , Director मुकेश भान्ती , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(राजस्व विभाग )
(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )
नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर , 2010
का, आ. 2301.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-2010 के आगे से संगठन औरोविले फाउंडेशन , औरोविले , तमिलनाडु को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अंशतः अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्: -
(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;
(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से सामाजिक विज्ञान या सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान करेगा;
( iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि उसमें दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;
( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-
(क) पैराग्राफ ! के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा
( ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
( ग ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
14147
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देख अपना इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को हाथ 'মাগো: अथवा
(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम और उस में केस पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धार वो हुआ ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रवचनु पाँ होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेंगा ।
[ अधिसूचना सं. 71 /2010/फा. सं. 203/ 68/ 2009-12-11 ]
अजय गोयल, निदेशक आकरि (Department of Revenue )
(Central Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi , the 7th September , 2010 S.O. 2301. It is hereby notified for generai information that the organization Auroville Foundation, Auroville , Tamil Nadu has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( iii ) of sub -section (1) of Section 35 of the Income -tax Act , 1961 ( said Act ) . read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules)from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in the category of ' other Institution ' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions . namely:-
(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for research in social sciences:
( ii) The approved organization shail carry out research in social science or statistical rescarch through its faculty members or its enrolled students;
(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income - tax or the Director of Income - tax having jurisdiction over the case. by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;
(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for research in social sciences and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .
6148
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:-
( a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or
(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or (c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for research in social sciences or statistical research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or ( d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or
( e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( iii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act , read with rules 5C and SE of the said Rules .
[Notification No. 71 / 2010 /F . No. 203/68 /2009/ ITA - II ]
AJAY GOYAL , Director ( ITA - II ) (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 10 सितम्बर , 2010
का.आ. 2302.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में , संलग्न अनुबंध में निम्नलिखित बैंकों/बीमा कंपनियों के सूचीबद्ध शाखाओं/ कार्यालयों को , जिनके 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।
क्रम बैंक/ बीमा कंपनियों/वित्तीय
[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 3. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बरखेडा शाखा , भोपाल-462021
4. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बैरसिया शाखा , भोपाल- 463106
5. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भोपाल मुख्य शाखा , भोपाल-462003
6. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक धमर्रा ग्रामीण शाखा , भोपाल-463101
7. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गोविन्दपुरा शाखा , भोपाल- 46-023
8. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गुलमोहर कॉलोनी शाखा , भोपरान्न--462039
9. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एच ई टी शाखा , भोपाल ..
10. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आइ आई एफ एम शाखा , भोपाल-462003
11. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एम ए सी टी शाखा , भोपाल-462007
12. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एम एल ए रेस्ट हाउस शाखा , भोपाल-462003 13. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एम पी नगर शाखा , भोपाल-462011
14. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक महावीर नगर शाखा, भोपाल-462016
शाखाओं/
सं. संस्थाओं के नाम
कार्यालयों
15. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक माईक्रो फॉयनेन्स शाखा , भोपाल-462011
की संख्या
1. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
930
930 कुल
[फा.सं. 11016/ 5 /2010-हिन्दी] सुरेन्द्र मोहन नय्यर , संयुक्त निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10( 4 ) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों/शाखाओं की सूची 1. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अकबरपुर ( कोलार रोड ) शाखा , भोपाल-462016 2. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अवधपुरी शाखा , भोपाल-462021
16. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नयापुरा ( कोलार रोड ) शाखा , भोपाल-462032 17. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नीलबड़ शाखा , भोपाल -462002
18. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नेहरु नगर शाखा , भोपाल-462038
19. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , शाहपुरा भोपाल-462016 20. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक वैयक्तिक बैंकिग , शाखा , न्यू मार्केट , भोपाल-462003 21. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर सी ई शाखा , भोपाल-462013 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
22. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सतपुड़ा भवन शाखा , भोपाल-462004
23. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सेवा शाखा , भोपाल -462011
24. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शिवाजी नगर शाखा , भोपाल-462006
25. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ट्रेडर्स शाखा , भोपाल-462011
26. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उदयाचल शाखा , भोपाल-462011
27. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वल्लभ भवन शाखा , भोपाल-462004
28. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
विंध्याचल भवन शाखा, भोपाल-462004 29. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा, खिलचीपुर राजगढ़ -465679 30. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , सारंगपुर राजगढ़-465697 31. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ब्यावरा शाखा , राजगढ़ -465674
32. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जीरापुर शाखा , राजगढ़ -465691
33. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नरसिंहगढ़ शाखा , राजगढ़ -465669
6149
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
41. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक राजपुर शाखा , बडवानी-451447
42. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सेन्धवा शाखा , बडवानी -451666
43. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , बुरहानपुर , बुरहानपुर -450331 44. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बुरहानपुर शाखा, बुरहानपुर-450331
45. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मण्डी चौक शाखा , बुरहानपुर -450331
46. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नेपा नगर शाखा , बुरहानपुर -450221
47. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शाहपुर शाखा , बुरहानपुर-450331
48. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , हरदा -461331
49. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मुख्य शाखा, हरदा -461331
50. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खिरकिया शाखा , हरदा -461441
51. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सीराली शाखा, हरदा-461335
52. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक टीमरनी शाखा, हरदा -461228
53. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
34. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पचौर शाखा , राजगढ़-465683
कृषि विकास शाखा , सिवनी मालवा , होशंगाबाद -461221 54. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
35. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राजगढ़ शाखा , राजगढ़ -496001
36. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अंजड शाखा , बडवानी-451556
37. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बडवानी शाखा , बडवानी -451551
38. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चाटली ग्रामीण शाखा, बडवानी -451669 सिवनी मालवा शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461223
55. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक श्योपुर शाखा, होशंगाबाद -461225
56. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आनंद नगर शाखा , खण्डवा , खण्डवा -450001 57. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिविल लाईन्स शाखा , खण्डवा , खण्डवा -450001 58. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
39. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
निवाली ग्रामीण शाखा , बडवानी -451667 40. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पलसूद ग्रामीण शाखा, बडवानी-451435 हरसुद शाखा , खण्डवा -450116
59. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खालवा शाखा , खण्डवा -450117 6150
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
60. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खण्डवा शाखा , खण्डवा-450001
61. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लाल चौकी शाखा , खण्डवा -450001
62. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नर्मदा नगर पुनासा शाखा , खण्डवा-450114 63. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिहादा शाखा, खण्डवा -450992
64. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बड़वाह शाखा , खरगोन-451115
65. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बेडिया शाखा , खरगोन -451113
66. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भीकनगांव शाखा , खरगोन-451331
67. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जवाहर मार्ग शाखा , खरगोन -451001
68. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कसरावद शाखा , खरगोन-451228
69. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खरगोन शाखा, खरगोन -451001
70. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक महेश्वर शाखा , खरगोन -451224
71. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सनावद ढकलगांव ग्रामीण शाखा , खरगोन -451111 72. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सेगांव शाखा, खरगोन --451442
73. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अलीराजपुर शाखा, अलीराजपुर-457887 74. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक धामनोद शाखा , धार -454552
75. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धार शाखा , धार -454001
76. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुक्षी शाखा , धार -454331
77. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मनावर शाखा , धार-454443
78. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पीथमपुर शाखा , धार -472336
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 79. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , सांवेर इन्दौर -453551
80. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अन्नपूर्णा रोड इन्दौर शाखा , इन्दौर -452002
81. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बसंत विहार कॉलोनी शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
82. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सी एस डब्ल्यू टी , बी एस एफ परिसर शाखा , इन्दौर-452005
83. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कलेक्टोरेट शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
84. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक देपालपुर शाखा , इन्दौर-453115
85. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गोधा कॉलोनी शाखा , इन्दौर -452004
86. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक हरसोला शाखा , इन्दौर -453441
87. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट शाखा , इन्दौर -452003
88. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक इन्दौर सिटी शाखा , इन्दौर -452003
89. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जामली ग्रामीण शाखा , इन्दौर -453643
90. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जवाहर मार्ग शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
91. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खण्डवा रोड शाखा , इन्दौर -452017
92. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एम जी रोड मार्केट शाखा , इन्दौर-452007
93. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एम जी. रोड शाखा , इन्दौर -452002
94. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक माणिक बाग रोड़ शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
95. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक महू शाखा , इन्दौर -453441
96. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एम पी एस ई बी शाखा, इन्दौर -452001
97. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नीलकंठ इन्दौर शाखा , इन्दौर -452006 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
98. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ओल्ड पलासिया इन्दौर शाखा , इन्दौर-452001 99. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा , विजय नगर , इन्दौर -452003 100. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा, वाय एन रोड , इन्दौर -452003
6151
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18, 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
117. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बैतुल शाखा , बैतुल-460001
118. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भैंसदेही शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460220
119. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बोड़की ग्रामीण शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460553
120. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
101. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
प्रकाश नगर शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
102. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राउ शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
चिचोली शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460330
121. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चिरापाटला शाखा बैतुल, बैतुल -460330
122. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
103. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर एन टी मार्ग शाखा, इन्दौर -452001
चूना हजूरी शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460330
123. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
104. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई शाखा , इन्दौर -452003
105. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सपना संगीता , इन्दौर -452001
106. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
देशावाड़ी शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460440
124. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोलगांव ग्रामीण शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460002
125. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सर्विस शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
107. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सुखनिवास इन्दौर शाखा , इन्दौर -452012
कोठी बाजार शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460001
126. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मूलताई शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460661
127. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
108. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , थांदला , झाबुआ-457777 109. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
झाबुआ शाखा, झाबुआ-457661
नंदा शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460330
128. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पाथाखेड़ा शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460449
129. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
110. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मेघनगर शाखा, झाबुआ-457779
प्रभात पट्टन ग्रामीण शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460665 130. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
111. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पेटलावद शाखा , झाबुआ-457773
112. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रानापुर शाखा , झाबुआ-457993
सदर शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल -460001
131. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सारणी शाखा बैतुल, बैतुल -460447
132. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
113. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , आमला बैतुल , बैतुल-460551 114. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आदर्श धनोरा ग्रामीण शाखा , बैतुल , बैतुल-460330 शाहपुरा शाखा बैतुल, बैतुल -460440
133. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शोभापुर शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल-460449
134. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
115. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एयर फोर्स स्टेशन आमला शाखा बैतुल , बैतुल-460553 कृषि विकास शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480001
135. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
116. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आठनेर शाखा , बैतुल -460110
अमर वाडा शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480221 6152
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
136. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अंभारा शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480551
137. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बरकुई शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480441
138. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भमोरी ग्रामीण शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480449
139. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बिछुआ शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480111
140. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बोरगांव शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480106
141. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चांदामेटा शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480447
142. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छिन्दवाड़ा मुख्य शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480001
143. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चिखलीकलान शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480557
144. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चौरई शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480115
145. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
दमुआ शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480555
146. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गंज एरिया शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480001
147. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गुरैया शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480332
148. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जुन्नारदेव शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480551
149. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कामठी ( सावरी बाजार ) स.ले. शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480331 150. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मोहखेड़ शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480228
151. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पांढुरना शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480334
152. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
परासिया शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480441
153. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480001
154. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
प्रसन्न विहार कॉलोनी शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480441
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 155. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रावन वाड़ा शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा-480441
156. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सौंसर शाखा, छिन्दवाड़ा-480106
157. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
उमरानाला शाखा , छिन्दवाड़ा -480107
158. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषिविकास शाखा , बागली देवास -455227
159. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक देवास शाखा , देवास -455001
160. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा , देवास -455001
161. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा लटूना , मन्दसौर -458489
162. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बोतलगंज शाखा , मन्दसौर -458664
163. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि उपज मंडी शाखा , मन्दसौर -458001
164. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मन्दसौर शाखा , मन्दसौर -458001
165. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कनावटी शाखा, नीमच -458441
166. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नीमच शाखा, नीमच-456006
167. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक विक्रम नगर ( दामोदरपुरा ) शाखा , नीमच -458330 168. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बसीन्द्रा शाखा , रतलाम -457001
169. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कलेक्टोरेट शाखा , रतलाम-457001
170. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कामर्शियल शाखा , रतलाम -457001
171. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डी आर एम कार्यालय शाखा , रतलाम -457001 172. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जावरा शाखा , रतलाम -457226
173. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कुण्डा ( स.ले. ) शाखा , रतलाम -457551 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
174. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एन आर आई बी ई रतलाम शाखा , रतलाम -457001
6153
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
193. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक महीदपुर शाखा , उज्जैन-456443
194. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
175. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा , रतलाम -457001 176. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रतलाम शाखा , रतलाम -457001
नागदा शाखा , उज्जैन-456335
195. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नई सडक शाखा , उज्जैन -456006
196. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
177. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शिवपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , रतलाम-457115
178. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आगर शाखा , शाजापुर-465002
नरवर शाखा , उज्जैन-456664
197. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नयापुरा शाखा , उज्जैन -456006
198. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
179. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अकोदिया मण्डी शाखा , शाजापुर-465223 180. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मक्सी नगर शाखा , शाजापुर -465106
सराफा शाखा , उज्जैन -456006
199. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक तराना शाखा , उज्जैन-456665
200. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
181. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मन्दोडा सब शाखा , शाजापुर -465226
उज्जैन मुख्य शाखा , उज्जैन -456001
201. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
182. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नलखेडा शाखा , शाजापुर-465445
कृषि विकास शाखा , बरेली रायसेन -464668
202. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
183. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शाजापुर शाखा , शाजापुर-465001
184. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शुजालपुर शाखा , शाजापुर-465331
बाडी शाखा , रायसेन-464665
203. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बेगम गंज शाखा , रायसेन -464881
204. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
185. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सुसनेर शाखा , शाजापुर-465447
डांडिया शाखा , रायसेन -464881
205. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
186. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा खाचरोद , उज्जैन-456224 देवरी शाखा , रायसेन-464774
206. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
187. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बडनगर शाखा , उज्जैन -456771
गैरत गंज शाखा , रायसेन -464884
207. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
188. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चिमन गंज मण्डी शाखा, उज्जैन -456001 मण्डीदीप शाखा , रायसेन -464046
208. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
189. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हरसौदन ग्रामीण शाखा , उज्जैन -456010 औबेदुल्लागंज शाखा , रायसेन-464993
209. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
190. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
इंगोरिया ग्रामीण शाखा , उज्जैन -456222
रायसेन शाखा, रायसेन-464551
210. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
191. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जैथल ग्रामीण शाखा , उज्जैन -456006
सलामतपुर शाखा , रायसेन -464651
211. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
192. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
माधव नगर शाखा उज्जैन , उज्जैन-456001 3484 G1 / 10-2
सियरमउ शाखा, रायसेन-464886 6154
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27, 1932
212. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिलवानी शाखा , रायसेन -464886 213. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिमरिया खुर्द शाखा , रायसेन -464671 214. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उदयपुरा शाखा , रायसेन -464770
215. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , सीहोर-466001 216. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आष्टा शाखा , सीहोर -466116
217. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बकतरा शाखा , सीहोर -466448
218. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बायां ग्रामीण शाखा , सीहोर-466441 219. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बिलकीस गंज ग्रामीण शाखा , सीहोर -466111 220. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बुधनी शाखा , सीहोर-466445
221. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डोबी ग्रामीण शाखा, सीहोर -466554 222. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
इछावर शाखा , सीहोर -466115
223. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जावर शाखा , सीहोर -466221
224. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कनोद मीरजी शाखा , सीहोर -466116 225. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कोठरी शाखा , सीहोर-466114
226. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लारकुई ग्रामीण शाखा , सीहोर -466331 227. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नसरूल्लागंज शाखा , सीहोर-466331 223. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक रेहटी शाखा , सीहोर-466446
229. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सीहोर शाखा, सीहोर -466001
230. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
श्यामपुर शाखा, सीहोर -466651
[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii) ] 231. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , विदिशा -464001
232. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अटारी खेजडा शाखा , विदिशा-464331
233. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बरवई ग्रामीण शाखा , विदिशा-464224
गंज बासोदा शाखा , विदिशा-464221 234. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
235. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खामखेडा शाखा , विदिशा-464226
236. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुरवाई शाखा , विदिशा-464224
237. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लटेरी शाखा , विदिशा -464114
238. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सटई विदिशा शाखा , विदिशा-464001
239. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिरोन्ज शाखा , विदिशा-464228
240. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक 3 ई एम ई सेन्टर , बैरागढ शाखा , भोपाल -462031 241. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एअर पोर्ट रोड शाखा , भोपाल-462036
242. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अयाध्या नगर शाखा, भोपाल-462023
243. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बाग मुगालिया शाखा , भोपाल-462026
244. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बैरागढ मेन मार्केट शाखा , भोपाल -462031
245. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भेल प्लांट एरिया शाखा , भोपाल-462022
246. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भोपाल युनिवर्सिटी शाखा , भोपाल-462026
247. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भोपाल मेमोरियल हास्पिटल एवं रिसर्च सेन्टर शाखा , भोपाल -462038
248. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चांदबड शाखा , भोपाल-462010
249. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छोला रोड शाखा , भोपाल-462001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
250. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सी आई ए ई शाखा , भोपाल-462038
6155
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
269. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बनखेडी शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461990
270. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
251. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डी आर एम कार्यालय शाखा , भोपाल-462001 252. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
फतेहगढ शाखा , भोपाल-462001
होशंगाबाद शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461001
271. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक इटारसी शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461111
272. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
253. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गांधी मेडिकल कॉलेज शाखा , भोपाल-462001 केसला शाखा , होशंगाबाद-461550
273. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
254. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गर्वनमेन्ट बिजनेस शाखा, भोपाल-462001 255. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हमीदिया रोड शाखा , भोपाल-462029
कृष्णापुरी शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461001
274. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक न्यूमार्केट शाखा , इटारसी होशंगाबाद -461111
275. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
256. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
होशंगाबाद रोड ( मिसरोद ) शाखा , भोपाल-462026 257. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जहाँगीराबाद शाखा , भोपाल-462008
पचमढी शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461811
276. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पिपरिया शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461775
277. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
258. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कस्तुरबा हास्पिटल भेल शाखा , भोपाल-462023 सेमरी हरचंद ( कामठी ) शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461771 278. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
259. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मारवाडी रोड शाखा , भोपाल-462001
सोहागपुर शाखा , होशंगाबाद-461771
279. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
260. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मिनाल रेसीडेन्सी शाखा , भोपाल-462023 एस पी एम शाखा , होशंगाबाद-461005
280. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
261. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
म्युनिसिपल कार्पोरेशन शाखा , भोपाल-462001 262. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पुरानी विधान सभा शाखा , भोपाल-462001 प्रशासनिक कार्यालय , भोपाल-462011
281. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सी सी पी सी , भोपाल-462011
282. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
263. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रॉयल मार्केट शाखा, भोपाल-462001
264. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई शाखा , भोपाल-462023
केन्द्रीय पेन्शन प्रोसेसिंग केन्द्र , भोपाल -462011
283. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कमर्शियल शाखा, भोपाल-462011
284. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
265. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सुल्तानिया रोड शाखा , भोपाल-462001 266. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , बाबई होशंगाबाद -461661 आर ए सी पी सी शाखा, भोपाल-462011
285. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस एम ई सी सी शाखा , भोपाल-462011
286. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
267. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , पिपरिया होशंगाबाद-461775 सी सी पी सी शाखा , इन्दौर -452001
287. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
268. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाबई शाखा , होशंगाबाद -461661
इन्दौर शाखा , इन्दौर -452001 6156
THE GAZETTE OF INDIĄ : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
288. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आर ए सी पी सी शाखा , इन्दौर -452001 289. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस ए आर सी शाखा , इन्दौर -452001 290. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई सी सी शाखा, इन्दौर -452001 291. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए एस ई सी सी शाखा , उज्जैन -456001 292. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सदर 01 सिगनल ट्रेनिंग सेन्टर जबलपुर शाखा , जबलपुर-482001
293. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , शांहपुर , जबलपुर -483119 294. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बरेला शाखा , जबलपुर -491332
295. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बारगी शाखा , जबलपुर-482051
296. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बरगी नगर शाखा , जबलपुर -482056
297. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भेडाघाट ग्रामीण शाखा , जबलपुर-482053 298. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीलहारी मण्डला रोड , जबलपुर-482020 299. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चौरई शाखा , जबलपुर -483110
300. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कमर्शियल शाखा , जबलपुर -482001
301. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गढ़ा शाखा , जबलपुर -482003
302. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जी ई सी शाखा , जबलपुर -482011
303. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोसलपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , जबलपुर -483222 304. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जी आर सी शाखा , जबलपुर -482001
305. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गन कैरिज फैक्टरी शाखा , जबलपुर -482011 306. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ग्वारी घाट रोड शाखा , जबलपुर-482008
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 307. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आई ई आधारताल शाखा , जबलपुर -482009
308. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अमलई ग्रामीण शाखा , जबलपुर -483110
309. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जबलपुर सिटी शाखा, जबलपुर -482002
310. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मुख्य शाखा , जबलपुर -482001
311. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जवाहरगंज शाखा , जबलपुर -482002
312. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के यू मण्डी शाखा , जबलपुर -482002
313. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कमला नेहरू नगर शाखा , जबलपुर -482002
314. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटंगा शाखा , जबलपुर -482001
315. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटंगी शाखा , जबलपुर -483105
316. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खिन्नी ग्रामीण शाखा , जबलपुर -483222
317. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मदन महल शाखा , जबलपुर -482002
318. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मढाताल शाखा , जबलपुर -482002
319. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मझोली शाखा , जबलपुर -483336
320. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मेडिकल कॉलेज शाखा , जबलपुर -482003
321. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मिल्लोनी गंज शाखा , जबलपुर -482002
322. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नयागांव रामपुर शाखा , जबलपुर -482008
323. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आर्डिनन्स फैक्टरी खमरिया शाखा , जबलपुर-- 482005 324. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पनागर शाखा , जबलपुर -483220
325. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पाटण शाखा , जबलपुर -483113 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
326. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा , जबलपुर -482001 327. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पौंडा ग्रामीण शाखा , जबलपुर -483225 328. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक रांझी शाखा , जबलपुर -482010
329. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक रिज रोड शाखा , जबलपुर -482001 330. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सेवा शाखा, जबलपुर , जबलपुर -482002 331. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
6157
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
345. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मलाजखण्ड शाखा , बालाघाट -481116
346. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मेंहदीवाडा ग्रामीण शाखा , बालाघाट-481302
347. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मोहगांव शाखा , बालाघाट-481118
348. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक वारासिवनी शाखा , बालाघाट -481331
349. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अमरपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , डिंडोरी -481666
350. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शक्तिनगर जबलपुर ( जी सी एफ ) शाखा, जबलपुर-482001
332. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सीहोरा शाखा , जबलपुर -483225 डिंडोरी शाखा , डिंडोरी -481880
351. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक समनापुर ग्रामीण शाखा , डिंडोरी -481778
352. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
333. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तुलाराम चौक शाखा , जबलपुर -482002 334. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बैहर शाखा , बालाघाट -481111
335. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बालाघाट शाखा , बालाघाट -481102 336. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भारवेली ग्रामीण शाखा , बालाघाट -481102 337. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भौंरगढ़ ग्रामीण शाखा , बालाघाट-481337 शाहपुर डिंडोरी ( निवास ) शाखा , डिंडोरी -481990 353. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अजनिया ग्रामीण शाखा , मण्डला-481993
354. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बीजाडांडी ग्रामीण शाखा , मण्डला-486674
355. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चिरई डोंगरी शाखा , मण्डला-481662
356. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मण्डला शाखा , मण्डला-481661
357. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
338. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक हिरीं शाखा , बालाघाट-481115
नैनपुर शाखा , मण्डला-481776
358. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
339. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
काचीवाही शाखा , बालाघाट -481332 340. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटंगी शाखा , बालाघाट-481445 341. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लालबरहा शाखा , बालाघाट -481441 342. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लामटा शाखा , बालाघाट -481551 नारायणगंज ग्रामीण शाखा , मण्डला-481662
359. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक निवास शाखा , मण्डला -481885
360. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पाडव मण्डला शाखा , मण्डला -481661
361. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उदयपुर ( मण्डला ) शाखा , मण्डला-481662
362. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
343. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लांझी शाखा , बालाघाट -481222
कृषि विकास शाखा नरसिंहपुर , नरसिंहपुर -487001 363. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
344. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लिंगा ग्रामीण शाखा, बालाघाट -481001 बनवारी ग्रामीण शाखा , नरसिंहपुर-487660.
6158
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
364. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चीचली शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487770
365. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गाडरवारा शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487551
366. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोटेगांव शाखा , नरसिंहपुर-487118
367. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अस्पताल रोड गाडरवारा शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487551 368. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
करेली शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487221
369. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
खमरिया शाखा, नरसिंहपुर -487118
370. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
खुलारी ग्रामीण शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -481441 371. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नरसिंहपुर शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487001
372. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सांईखेडा शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487661
373. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सीहोरा ( बोहानी ) ग्रामीण शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487441 374. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सुआतला ग्रामीण शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487315 375. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तेंदूखेडा नरसिंहपुर शाखा , नरसिंहपुर -487337 376. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बरघाट शाखा , सिवनी -480667
377. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छपारा शाखा, सिवनी -480884
378. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धनौरा ग्रामीण शाखा , सिवनी -480998
379. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
घनसोर शाखा, सिवनी -480997
380. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
केओलारी शाखा , सिवनी-480994
381. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लखनादोन शाखा , सिवनी-480886
382. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मंगलीपेथ सिवनी शाखा , सिवनी-480661 383. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिवनी शाखा, सिवनी -480661
384. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अमीलकी ग्रामीण शाखा , रीवा -486550
385. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चाकघाट शाखा , रीवा -486556
386. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डभौरा शाखा , रीवा -486556
387. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जी ई सी रीवा शाखा , रीवा -486002
388. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक हनुमना शाखा , रीवा-486335
389. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मउगंज शाखा , रीवा -486335
390. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पीली कोठी रीवा शाखा , रीवा -486001
391. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रीवा मुख्य शाखा , रीवा -486001
392. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रीवा सिटी शाखा , रीवा -486001
393. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिमरिया शाखा , रीवा -486445
394. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई रीवा शाखा , रीवा -486001
395. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक टेओनी ग्रामीण शाखा , रीवा-486112
396. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अमरपाटन शाखा , सतना-485775
397. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बरेठिया शाखा , सतना -485441
398. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बिरला कालोनी शाखा , सतना -485005
399. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलेक्टोरेट शाखा , सतना , सतना -485001
400. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कॉमर्शियल शाखा , सतना , सतना-485001
401. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जैतवारा शाखा , सतना -485221 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
402. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
माधवगढ ग्रामीण शाखा , सतना-485115 403. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मैहर शाखा, सतना-485771
404. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नागोद शाखा , सतना -485446
405. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिंग शाखा , सतना-485001
406. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
6159
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
421. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक विद्या नगर एस टी पी एस शाखा , सिंगरौली-486885 422. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक वैढ़न शाखा , सिंगरौली -486886
423. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अमरकंटक शाखा , अनूपपुर -484886
424. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अनूपपुर शाखा , अनूपपुर -484224
425. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिजुरी शाखा , अनूपपुर -484440
426. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
प्रिज्म सीमेंट प्रोजेक्ट साईट मनकहरी ग्रामीण शाखा , सतना-485115
407. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जैथारी शाखा , अनूपपुर-484330
427. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रामनगर तुर्की शाखा , सतना-485881
408. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जमुना कौलरी शाखा , अनूपपुर -484444
428. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रामपुर बघेलन शाखा , सतना-485115
409. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सतना मुख्य शाखा , सतना-485001
410. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
करेपा शाखा , अनूपपुर-484881
429. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोतमा शाखा , अनूपपुर -484334
430. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सतना सिटी शाखा , सतना -485001
411. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , चुरहट सीधी -486771 412. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कोतमा कौलरी शाखा , अनूपपुर -484336
431. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बडागांव ग्रामीण शाखा , कटनी-483010
432. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोरबी शाखा, सीधी-486892
413. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राजमिलन कोयलकूठ शाखा , सीधी -486886 414. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बरही शाखा , कटनी -483770
433. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बोहरीबंद ग्रामीण शाखा, कटनी-483330
434. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सीधी शाखा , सीधी -486661
415. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
देवगांव ग्रामीण शाखा , कटनी-483501
435. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सीधी सिटी शाखा , सीधी -486661
416. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
घंटाघर कटनी सांय शाखा , कटनी-483501
436. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अमरोली शाखा , सिंगरौली -486886
417. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जयंत शाखा , सिंगरौली -486886
418. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
झिंगुरदा शाखा , सिंगरौली -486889
419. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कॉटी शाखा , कटनी-483501
437. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटनी शाखा, कटनी -483501
438. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटनी बाजार शाखा , कटनी-483501
439. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मोरवा शाखा , सिंगरौली -486889
420. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कैमूर शाखा, कटनी-483880
440. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सासन शाखा , सिंगरौली -486886
न्यूकटनी जंक्शन शाखा , कटनी -483503 6160
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
441. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक निवार शाखा , कटनी-483442
442. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ओर्डनेंस फेक्ट्री कटनी शाखा , कटनी-483583 443. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैकिंग शाखा , कटनी -483501
444. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पिपरिया कलॉ ग्रामीण शाखा , कटनी -483770 445. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रीठी शाखा , कटनी-483990
446. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
स्लीमनाबाद ग्रामीण शाखा , कटनी-483440
447. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई कटनी शाखा , कटनी-483501
448. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
उमरियापन ग्रामीण शाखा, कटनी-483332
449. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
विजयराघवगढ़ ग्रामीण शाखा, कटनी-483775 450. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
विलाइत कलॉ ( भजिया ) ग्रामीण शाखा , कटनी-483773 451. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अमलाई शाखा , शहडोल -484117
452. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाणसागर डेम देवलोंद शाखा , शहडोल -484772 453. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ब्योहारी शाखा , शहडोल -484774
454. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धनपुरी शाखा , शहडोल -484114
455. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जयसिंहनगर शाखा , शहडोल -484771
456. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लालपुर बुरहार शाखा , शहडोल -484110
457. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मार्केट एरिया शहडोल शाखा , शहडोल -484001 458. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राजेन्द्र कॉलोनी शाखा , शहडोल -484110
459. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शहडोल शाखा , शहडोल-484001
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 460. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिंहपुर शाखा , शहडोल -484010
461. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चांदिया शाखा , उमरिया -484660
462. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मानपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , उमरिया -484665
463. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मार्केट एरिया उमरिया शाखा , उमरिया-484661
464. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नौरोजाबाद शाखा , उमरिया -484555
पाली शाखा, उमरिया -484551 465. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
466. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शाहपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , उमरिया -484551
467. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उमरिया शाखा, उमरिया -484661
468. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा दमोह , दमोह -470662
469. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अभाना शाखा, दमोह -470662
बतियागढ शाखा , दमोह -470673 470. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
दमोह शाखा , दमोह -470661 471. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
472. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दमोह सिटी शाखा , दमोह -470661
473. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक देवडोंगरा शाखा , दमोह -470772
474. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक फुतेरा कलॉ ग्रामीण शाखा , दमोह -470674
475. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक हटा शाखा , दमोह -470775
476. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक हिंडोरिया शाखा , दमोह -470771
477. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हिनौताकलॉ ग्रामीण शाखा , दमोह -470775
478. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जबेरा शाखा, दमोह -470881 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
479. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खण्डेरी ( सले ) शाखा , दमोह -470666 480. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक किंदरहो ( स ले ) शाखा , दमोह -470666 481. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नरसिंहगढ शाखा , दमोह -470675 482. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पटेरा शाखा , दमोह -470772
483. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पथरिया शाखा , दमोह -470666 484. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पटनाराजा शाखा , दमोह -470901
6161
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
498. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खुरई शाखा, सागर -470117
499. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक महार रेजीमेंटल सेंटर शाखा , सागर-470001
500. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मकरोनिया शाखा , सागर -470004
501. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मंडी बमोरा शाखा, सागर -470111
मेडीकल कॉलेज शाखा , सागर -470001 502. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
503. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक राहतगढ शाखा , सागर -461251
504. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
485. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सांगा शाखा , दमोह -470880
486. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक तेंदूखेडा शाखा , दमोह -470880 आर ए एस एस ई सी सी कम एस ए आर सी शाखा , सागर-470001
505. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
487. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अगासोद शाखा , सागर -470113 488. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बडा बाजार शाखा , सागर -470002 489. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बंडा ( बलाई ) शाखा , सागर -470335 490. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बान्द्री ग्रामीण शाखा , सागर-470442 491. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीना शाखा , सागर -470113
492. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिविल लाईन शाखा , सागर-470001 रेहली शाखा , सागर -470227
506. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सागर मुख्य शाखा , सागर -470002
507. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सागर यूनीवर्सिटी शाखा , सागर -470003
508. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सेमधाना शाखा , सागर-470120
509. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शाहगढ शाखा , सागर -470339
510. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शाहपुर गणेशगंज शाखा, सागर -470669
511. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
493. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
देवरी शाखा , सागर-470226
494. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक धाना शाखा , सागर -470228
एस एम ई सागर शाखा , सागर-470002
512. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आंचलिक कार्यालय शाखा , जबलपुर-482002
513. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
495. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गढाकोटा शाखा , सागर -470229
सी सी पी सी जबलपुर शाखा , जबलपुर -482002 514. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
496. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गोपालगंज शाखा , सागर -470001 आर ए एस ई , सी पी सी जबलपुर शाखा , जबलपुर-482001
515. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
497. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जैसीनगर शाखा , सागर -470125 3484 GJ / 10-3
सार्क जबलपुर शाखा , जबलपुर -482002 6162
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
516. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक छाटी ग्रामीण शाखा , धमतरी -493663
517. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलेक्ट्रेट धमतरी शाखा , धमतरी -493773 518. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धमतरी शाखा , धमतरी -493773
519. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कुरूद शाखा , धमतरी -493663
520. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नगरी शाखा , धमतरी -493778
521. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बागबेहरा शाखा , महासमुन्द -493449
522. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाम्हनी स ले शाखा , महासमुन्द-493445 523. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बिछिया स ले शाखा , महासमुन्द -493558 524. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुआकुडा शाखा , महासमुन्द-493553
525. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
महासमुन्द शाखा , महासमुन्द-493445
526. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पिथौरा शाखा, महासमुन्द-493551
527. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सराई पाली चिवरा कोटा शाखा , महासमुन्द -493558 528. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अग्रसेन चौक शाखा , रायपुर -492001
529. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आकांक्षा शाखा , पचपेडी नाका रायपुर
रायपुर-492001
530. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस पी हाउसिंग फायनेंस बैरन बाजार शाखा , रायपुर-492001
531. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जी सी ई टी शाखा , रायपुर -492882
5.32. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कचहरी शाखा , रायपुर-492001
533. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
न्यू शान्ति नगर शाखा , रायपुर -492001
[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 534. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , रायपुर -492001
535. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पंढरीतराई के यू एम शाखा , रायपुर -492004
वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , चौबे कालोनी रायपुर-492001 536. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
537. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
फाफाडीह शाखा , रायपुर -492009
538. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक प्रगति शाखा , रायपुर -492001
539. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर एस यूनीवर्सिटी शाखा , रायपुर -492010
540. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मुख्य शाखा , रायपुर -492001
541. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक राम सागर पारा शाखा , रायपुर-492001
542. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस एम ई शाखा , रायपुर -492001
543. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सचिवालय शाखा , रायपुर-492001
544. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सेवा शाखा , रायपुर -492001
545. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शस्त्री मार्केट शाखा , रायपुर-492001
546. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस एम ई सी सी शाखा, रायपुर-492001
547. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस पी शासकीय व्यापार शाखा , रायपुर-492001 548: भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सुन्दर नगर शाखा , रायपुर -492001
549. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
टेलीबांधा शाखा , रायपुर-492006
550. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक व्ही आई पी ईस्टेट शाखा , रायपुर -492001
551. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डब्ल्यू आर एस कॉलोनी शाखा , रायपुर -492001 552. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाल्को टाउनशिप शाखा , कोरबा -495682 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
553. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक प्रोजेक्ट शाखा , बालगी कोरबा -495455 554. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बांकीमोगरा शाखा , कोरबा-495447
555. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बारापाली शाखा , कोरबा-495674
556. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक देलावदिह शाखा , कोरबा-495445
557. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दीपिका शाखा , कोरबा -495677
558. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गेवरा शाखा , कोरबा -495452
559. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एच टी पी एस शाखा , कोरबा -495681 560. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आई टी आई कॉलोनी रामपुर कोरबा शाखा , कोरबा -495667
561. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटघोरा शाखा , कोरबा -495445
562. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मुख्य शाखा, कोरबा-495677
563. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कोरबा सिटी शाखा, कोरबा-495677
564. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुसुमुण्डा शाखा , कोरबा-495454
565. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक माचाडोली शाखा , कोरबा-495453
566. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मणिकपुर शाखा , कोरबा-495682
567. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मोरगा ग्रामीण शाखा , कोरबा -495445
568. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एम पी ई बी शाखा , कोरबा -495681 569. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एन टी पी सी जमनापाली शाखा , कोरबा-495450 570. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक निहारिका शाखा , कोरबा-491681
571. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ओमपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , कोरबा -495683
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
6163 572. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पाली ग्रामीण शाखा, कोरबा-495445
573. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पौंडी उपरोरा ग्रामीण शाखा , कोरबा-495444
574. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक क्षेत्रीय व्यवसाय कार्यालय , कोरबा -495677
575. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस ई सी एल शाखा , कोरबा -495679
576. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उर्जा शाखा , कोरबा-495674
577. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पश्चिम शाखा, कोरबा-495680
578. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बैकुण्ठपुर शाखा , कोरिया -497335
579. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बरतुन्गा शाखा , कोरिया-497449
580. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चिरीमिरी शाखा, कोरिया-497449
581. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चर्चा शाखा , कोरिया -497339
582. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जनकपुर शाखा , कोरिया-497778
583. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खोंगापानी शाखा , कोरिया-497447
584. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुरासिआ शाखा , कोरिया -497553
585. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मनेन्द्रगढ़ शाखा , कोरिया-497442
586. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अम्बिकापुर शाखा , सरगुजा-497001
587. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अम्बिकापुर सिटी शाखा , सरगुजा -497001
588. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बतौली शाखा , सरगुजा -497001
589. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भैयाथन शाखा , सरगुजा -497231
590. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भटगांव शाखा , सरगुजा -497235 6164
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
591. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिश्रामपुर शाखा , सरगुजा -497226
592. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलेक्ट्रेट अम्बिकापुर शाखा , सरगुजा-497001 593. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आई एफ एफ सी ओ प्रेमनगर शाखा , सरगुजा -497333 594. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कमलेशवर शाखा , सरगुजा-497127
595. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कुसमी शाखा , सरगुजा -497222
596. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
परसागुडी शाखा , सरगुजा -497110
597. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
प्रतापपुर शाखा , सरगुजा-497223
598. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक राजपुर शाखा , सरगुजा-497118
599. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रामानुजगंज शाखा , सरगुजा -497220
600. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सूरजपुर शाखा , सरगुजा-497229
601. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वाडरफ नगर शाखा , सरगुजा-497225
602. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , बालोद दुर्ग -491226
603. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ए सी सी जामुल शाखा , दुर्ग -490024
604. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अल्फाडिपार्टमेंट स्टोर भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490006 605. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बालोद शाखा , दुर्ग-491226
606. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बेमेतारा शाखा , दुर्ग-491335
607. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भारदाकला शाखा , दुर्ग -491225
608. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भिलाई शाखा, दुर्ग -490001
609. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भिलाई केम्प एरिया शाखा , दुर्ग -490001
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 610. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भिलाई चारोदा शाखा , दुर्ग -490025
611. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भिलाई अस्पताल एरिया शाखा , दुर्ग -490006
612. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भिलाई मार्केट एरिया शाखा , दुर्ग -490001
613. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भिलाई स्टील प्लांट एरिया शाखा , दुर्ग -490001
614. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भिलाई 3 शाखा , दुर्ग -490001
615. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छिरहा शाखा, दुर्ग-491335
616. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धामधा शाखा , दुर्ग -491331
617. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक डोंडी शाखा , दुर्ग -491230
618. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डोंडी लोहारा शाखा , दुर्ग -491771
619. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दुर्ग शाखा, दुर्ग -491001
620. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गुंडारदेही शाखा , दुर्ग -491223
621. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490026
622. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक इंदिरा प्लेस भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490010
623. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक करेसारा स ले शाखा , दुर्ग-491335
624. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुम्हारी शाखा , दुर्ग-490042
625. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मालवीय नगर दुर्ग शाखा , दुर्ग -491001
626. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मरोदा उत्तई शाखा , दुर्ग -490006
627. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नंदनी टाउनशिप भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490036
628. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नवागढ़ शाखा , दुर्ग-491337 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
629. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा, भिलाई दुर्ग -490026 630. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पाटन शाखा , दुर्ग-491111
631. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक राजहरा शाखा , दुर्ग -491228
632. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रेसली भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490006
633. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490001 634. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई दुर्ग शाखा , दुर्ग -491001 635. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
स्टेशन रोड दुर्ग शाखा , दुर्ग -491011 636. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सुपेला भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490023
637. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सुरेगांव स ले शाखा , दुर्ग-491225
638. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक टेमरी ग्रामीण शाखा, दुर्ग-491335
639. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैशाली नगर भिलाई शाखा , दुर्ग -490023 640. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , राजनांदगांव-491441 641. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छुरिया शाखा , राजनांदगांव -491558.
642. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
6165
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
648. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस एम ई राजनांदगांव शाखा , राजनांदगांव -491441 649. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , जगदलपुर बस्तर -494001 650.. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अदावल ग्रामीण शाखा , बस्तर -494223
651. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बजाबंड ग्रामीण शाखा , बस्तर -494221
652. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बकाबंद ग्रामीण शाखा , बस्तर -494222
653. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बस्तर ग्रामीण शाखा , बस्तर -494223
654. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भानपुरी ग्रामीण शाखा , बस्तर -494224
655. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कलेक्ट्रेट जगदलपुर शाखा , बस्तर -494001
656. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जगदलपुर शाखा , बस्तर -494001
657. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक केसरपाल स ले शाखा , बस्तर -494224
658. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक केसकाल शाखा , बस्तर -494331
659. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोंडागांव शाखा , बस्तर -494226
660. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लोहांडीगुडा ग्रामीण शाखा , बस्तर -494010
661. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलेक्ट्रेट शाखा , राजनांदगांव -491441 643. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डोंगरगांव शाखा , राजनांदगांव -491661 644. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गंडई पडरिया शाखा , राजनांदगांव-491888 645: भारतीय स्टेट बैंक खैरागढ शाखा , राजनांदगांव -4911881 646. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुरमुण्डाशाखा, राजनांदगांव-491445 फारसगांव शाखा , बस्तर -494228
662. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस एम ई जगदलपुर शाखा , बस्तर -494001
663. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक टोकापाल शाखा , बस्तर -494442
664. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अवापल्ली ग्रामीण शाखा , बिजापुर-494447
665. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भैरमगढ़ ग्रामीण शाखा , बिजापुर -494443
666. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
647. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक राजनांदगांव शाखा , राजनांदगांव -491441 भोपालपटनम शाखा , बिजापुर -494446 6166
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
667. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिजापुर शाखा , बिजापुर -494444
668. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नेमेड शाखा, बिजापुर-494114
669. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बचेली शाखा , दंतेवाडा-494553
670. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दंतेवाडा शाखा , दंतेवाडा-494449
671. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गीदम शाखा , दंतेवाडा -494441
672. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक किरनडुल शाखा , दंतेवाडा-494556
673. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
केन्टा शाखा , दंतेवाडा -494114
674. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एम पी ई बी कालोनी बोधघाट शाखा , दंतेवाडा-494441 675. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नकुलनार ग्रामीण शाखा , दंतेवाडा-494552
676. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सुकमा शाखा , दंतेवाडा -494111
677. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अंतागढ़ शाखा , कांकेर -494665
678. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक असुलखार स ले शाखा , कांकेर -494669
679. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अतुरगांव स ले शाखा, कांकेर -494334
680. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बंदे ग्रामीण शाखा , कांकेर -494777
681. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भानुप्रतापपुर शाखा , कांकेर -494669
682. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चरामा शाखा , कांकेर -494337
683. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दुर्गकोण्डल स ले शाखा , कांकेर -494669
684. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कांकेर शाखा , कांकेर-494334
685. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोरार शाखा , कांकेर-494670
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 686. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नरहारपुर शाखा , कांकेर-494333
687. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पाखनजोर शाखा, कांकेर-494776
सरोन शाखा , कांकेर -494335 688. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नारायणपुर शाखा , नारायणपुर-494661 689. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चंद्रहंसनी शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495688 690. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
691. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक डबरा चौक शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495688
692. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बगीचा शाखा , जशपुर -496224
693. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कलेक्ट्रेट शाखा , जशपुर -496331
694. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दुललुला शाखा , जशपुर-496334
695. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गजियादिह शाखा , जशपुर -496220
696. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जशपुर नगर शाखा , जशपुर -496331
697. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कांसाबेल शाखा , जशपुर-496223
केरादिह स ले शाखा , जशपुर -496334 698. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
699. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोटबा शाखा , जशपुर -496220
700. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कुनकुरी शाखा , जशपुर -496225
701. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मनोरा शाखा , जशपुर-496330
702. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पाथलगांव शाखा , जशपुर-496118
703. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सराबकम्बो शाखा , जशपुर -496224
704. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक तपकारा शाखा , जशपुर -496227 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
705. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , रायगढ़ -496001
706. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , सारंगगढ , रायगढ़ -496445 707. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बरमकेला शाखा , रायगढ़ -496551
708. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चक्रधर नगर शाखा , रायगढ़ -496001
709. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छाल शाखा , रायगढ़ -496665
710. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धरमजयगढ़ शाखा , रायगढ़ -496116
711. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गेरवानी शाखा , रायगढ़ -496001
712. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
घरघोडा शाखा, रायगढ़ -496111
713. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जिंदल स्टील एण्ड पॉवर लिमिटेड पत्रापली शाखा , रायगढ़-496001
714. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कबीर चौक शाखा , रायगढ़ -496001
715. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
खरसिया शाखा , रायगढ़ -496661
716. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कोंडातराई शाखा , रायगढ़ -496100
717. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लैलूंगा शाखा , रायगढ़ -496113
718. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लेधरा स ले शाखा , रायगढ़ -496551
719. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
व्यक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , रायगढ़ , रायगढ़ -496001 720. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
फरसाबहार शाखा , रायगढ़ -496242
721. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पुसोर शाखा , रायगढ़-496440
6167
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
724. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सरिया शाखा , रायगढ़ -496554
725. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक एस एम ई रायगढ़ शाखा, रायगढ़ -496001
726. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक तमनार ग्रामीण शाखा , रायगढ़ -496107
कृषि विकास शाखा , बिलासपुर , बिलासपुर -495001 727. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
728. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बैथलपुर शाखा , बिलासपुर -495224
729. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बेलगहना शाखा , बिलासपुर -495116
730. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिलासपुर शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001
731. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिलहा शाखा , बिलासपुर -495224
732. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चकर भाटा शाखा , बिलासपुर -495220
733. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सिटी शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001
734. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कलेक्ट्रेट शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001
कॉमर्शियल शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001 735. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
उच्च न्यायालय शाखा , बिलासपुर-495001 736. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
737. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कठाकोनी ग्रामीण शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001
738. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोटा बिलासपुर शाखा , बिलासपुर -495113
739. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लखराम ग्रामीण शाखा , बिलासपुर -495442
740. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लोरमी शाखा , बिलासपुर-495115
741. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
722. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रायगढ़ शाखा , रायगढ़ -496001
723. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सांरगगढ़ शाखा , रायगढ़ -496445
मरवाही ग्रामीण शाखा , बिलासपुर -495118
742. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मस्तुरी शाखा, बिलासपुर -495551 6168
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
743. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मोपका ग्रामीण शाखा, बिलासपुर -495011 744. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुंगेली शाखा , बिलासपुर -495334
745. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पचफेरी ग्रामीण शाखा , बिलासपुर -495551 746. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पथरिया ग्रामीण शाखा , बिलासपुर -495335 747. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001 748. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पेंढरा रोड शाखा, बिलासपुर -495117 749. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पेंढरा ग्रामीण शाखा , बिलासपुर -495119 750. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रेलवे कालोनी शाखा , बिलासपुर-495004 751. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राज किशोर नगर शाखा , बिलासपुर -495006 752. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रतनपुर शाखा , बिलासपुर -495442
753. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस ई सी एल शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001 754. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सरकंडा शाखा , बिलासपुर-495001 755. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
श्रीकान्त वर्मा मार्ग शाखा , बिलासपुर -495001 756. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सीपेट शाखा , बिलासपुर -495555
757. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तखतपकुर शाखा , बिलासपुर-495330 758. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तिफरा शाखा , बिलासपुर -495223
759. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बिदौरा स ले शाखा , कवर्धा-491995 760. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बोदला ग्रामीण शाखा , कवर्धा-491333 761. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चिल्फीग्रामीण शाखा , कवर्धा-491995
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 762. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कवर्धा शाखा , कवर्धा-491195
763. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पंढरिया शाखा, कवर्धा-495337
764. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक रेंगाखार शाखा , कवर्धा-491888
765. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक साहसपुर लोहरा शाखा , कवर्धा-491991
766. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अकलतरा शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495552
767. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बलोदा ग्रामीण शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495559 768. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बरदवार शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495687
769. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चांपा शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495671
770. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जयजयपुर ग्रामीण शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495686 771. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जांजगीर शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495668
772. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कटौद शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495668
773. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पामगढ शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495554
774. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक परसदा शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495663
775. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शक्तिशाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495689
776. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सारागांव शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495221
777. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिवरीनारायण शाखा , जांजगीर ( चांपा ) -495557 778. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , भाटापारा रायपुर -493118 779. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अंबूजा सीमेंट रावणवारा शाखा, रायपुर -493322 780. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आरंग शाखा , रायपुर-493441 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
781. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बलोदा बाजार शाखा , रायपुर -493332 782. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
6169 800. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक आर ए एस ई सी सी भिलाई , दुर्ग-490001
801. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भानपुरी शाखा, रायपुर-493221
783. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए एस ई सी सी कोरबा , कोरबा-495677
802. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भाटापारा शाखा , रायपुर-493118
784. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए एस एम ई सी सी रायपुर , रायपुर -492001 803. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
विलाईगढ शाखा , रायपुर-493338
785. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए आर सी रायपुर , रायपुर-492001
804. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छुरा शाखा , रायपुर-493996
786. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अशोकनगर शाखा , अशोकनगर-473331
805. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गरियाबंद शाखा , रायपुर -493009
चंदेरी शाखा , अशोकनगर -473446
806. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
787. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गाटादिह स ले शाखा , रायपुर-493559 मुंगावली शाखा , अशोकनगर -473443
807. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
788. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ग्रेसिम सीमेंट रावण शाखा, रायपुर-493195 आरोन शाखा , गुना-473101
808. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
789. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हिरमी शाखा, रायपुर -493195
बड़ोद शाखा , गुना-473287
809. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
790. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट उरला शाखा , रायपुर-493221 बरसत शाखा , गुना-473273
810. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
791. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कसदोल शाखा , रायपुर-493335
792. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मांढर शाखा , रायपुर-493311
बवरीखेड़ा ( एन एफ एल काम्प्लेक्स ) शाखा , गुना-473111
811. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीनागंज शाखा, गुना-473115
793. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
812. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नवपारा राजिम शाखा , रायपुर -493881 794. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गैल कम्प्लेक्स विजयपुर शाखा , गुना-473112
813. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नेवरा शाखा , रायपुर -493114
795. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गुना शाखा, गुना-473001
814. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रासेदिह स ले शाखा , रायपुर-493332
796. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एयरपोर्ट रोड शाखा , ग्वालियर -474001
815. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रोहासी शाखा , रायपुर-493228
797. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सी सी पी सी शाखा, ग्वालियर -474001
816. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिमगा शाखा , रायपुर -493101
798. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
प्रशासनिक कार्यालय रायपुर -492007
799. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिटी सेन्टर शाखा , ग्वालियर-474001
817. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कलेक्ट्रेट शाखा , ग्वालियर-474001
818. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए एस ई सी सी बिलासपुर , बिलासपुर -495001 3484 G7 / 10-4
कॉमर्शियल शाखा , ग्वालियर -474001 6170
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
819. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डी आर डी ई शाखा, ग्वालियर-474002
820. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जी आर मेडीकल कालेज शाखा , ग्वालियर -474009 821. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ग्वालियर मुख्य शाखा, ग्वालियर -474001 822. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
इंडस्ट्रियल ईस्टेट शाखा, ग्वालियर -474003 823. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जयेन्द्रगंज शाखा , ग्वालियर -474009
824. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मयूर मार्केट शाखा , ग्वालियर -474011
825. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मेला रोड शाखा , ग्वालियर -474002
820. 'भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुरार शाखा , ग्वालियर -474006
827. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मातीमहल शाखा , ग्वालियर -474007
828. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नया बाजार शाखा , ग्वालियर -474001
829. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , ग्वालियर -474007 830. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रामबाग कालोनी शाखा , ग्वालियर -474002 831. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक श्योपुरकलां शाखा , श्योपुरकलां-476337 832. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
विजयपुर शाखा , श्योपुरकलां -476332
833. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
देहरवारा शाखा , शिवपुरी -473774
8.34 . भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
करेरा शाखा, शिवपुरी -473660
835. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
खनियाधाना शाखा , शिवपुरी -473990
830. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कोलारस शाखा , शिवपुरी -473770
1.37. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नरवर शाखा , शिवपुरी -473880
838. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैयक्तिक बैंकिग शाखा , शिवपुरी -473551
839. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पिछोर शाखा , शिवपुरी -473995
840. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शिवपुरी शाखा, शिवपुरी-473551
841. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आलमपुर शाखा , भिण्ड-477449
842. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भिण्ड शाखा , भिण्ड -477001
843. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलेक्ट्रेट भिण्ड शाखा , भिण्ड-477001
844. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गोहाद शाखा , भिण्ड -477116
845. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लहार शाखा , भिण्ड-477445
846. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मालनपुर इण्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया शाखा , भिण्ड -477117 847. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मेहगांव शाखा, भिण्ड-477557
848. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कृषि विकास शाखा , दतिया-475661
849. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भाण्डेर शाखा , दतिया -475335
850. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक दतिया शाखा , दतिया -475661
851. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक इन्दरगढ शाखा , दतिया -475675
852. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सालोन भिटारी ग्रामीण शाखा , दतिया-475336 853. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सेंवधा शाखा, दतिया-475692
854. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उचाड ग्रामीण शाखा , दतिया -475675
855. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बी एस एफ टेकनपुर शाखा , ग्वालियर -475005 856. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भितरवार ग्वालियर -475220 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
857. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिलौआ ग्रामीण शाखा , ग्वालियर-475 003 858. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डबरा शाखा, ग्वालियर -475 110
6171
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
001
876. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक सराई चोला ग्रामीण शाखा , मुरैना-476
877. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक थरा ग्रामीण शाखा , मुरैना-476 117
878. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
859. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
-475 002 हस्तिनापुर ग्रामीण शाखा , ग्वालियर
कृषि विकास शाखा, छतरपुर-471 001
879. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
860. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
करैया ग्रामीण शाखा, ग्वालियर -475 220 861. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कुलैथ शाखा , ग्वालियर -474 010
862. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पिछोर शाखा, ग्वालियर-475 115
863. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कृषि विकास शाखा , जौरा मुरैना -476 221 बडा मलेहरा शाखा , छतरपुर -471 311
880. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बिजावर शाखा , छतरपुर -471 405
881. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बक्सवाहा शाखा , छतरपुर -471 318
882. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चांदला शाखा , छतरपुर -471 525
883. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
864. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
229 कृषि विकास शाखा , सबलगढ मुरैना-476 865. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अम्बाह शाखा , मुरैना-476 444
866. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बड़ागांव नौली शाखा , मुरैना-476 133 867. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बांमोर शाखा, मुरैना-476 444
868. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बसैया ग्रामीण शाखा , मुरैना -476 011 869. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक झुण्डकुरा ग्रामीण शाखा , मुरैना -476 226 870. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जिवाजीगंज मंडी ग्रामीण शाखा , मुरैना-476001 871. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक कोलारस शाखा , मुरैना-476 224
872. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मंगरोल शाखा , मुरैना-476 230
873. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक मुरैना शाखा , मुरैना-476 001
874. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पोरसा शाखा , मुरैना-476 115
875. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सबलगढ़ शाखा, मुरैना -476 229
छतरपुर मुख्य शाखा , छतरपुर 471 001
884. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चौक बाजार शाखा , छतरपुर -471 001
885. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गढी मलेहरा शाखा , छतरपुर -471 411
886. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक घुवारा शाखा , छतरपुर -471 313
887. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक गुलगंज शाखा , छतरपुर-471 301
हरपालपुर शाखा , छतरपुर-471 111 888. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
खुजराहो शाखा , छतरपुर-471 606 889. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
890. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लोण्डी शाखा , छतरपुर-471 515
891. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक नौगांव ( बी के डी ) शाखा , छतरपुर -471 201 892. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक परसानिया शाखा , छतरपुर-471 515
राजनगर शाखा , छतरपुर -471 625 893. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
894. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक रंगोली स ले शाखा , छतरपुर -471 408 6172
895. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई शाखा , छतरपुर -471001 896. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सतई शाखा , छतरपुर -471 408 897. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अजयगढ शाखा , पन्ना-488 220 898. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अमनगंज शाखा , पन्ना-488 441 899. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीरा स ले शाखा , पन्ना-488 220 900. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
देवेन्द्र नगर शाखा , पन्ना-488 333 901. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गुनौर ग्रामीण शाखा , पन्ना-488 050 902. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हरदवाही शाखा , पन्ना-488 050 903. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ककरहट्टी शाखा, पन्ना
-488 050 904. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
101 मजगवां ग्रामीण शाखा , पन्ना-488 905. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पन्ना शाखा , पन्ना-488 001
906. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पन्ना सिटी शाखा , पन्ना-488 001 907. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पवई शाखा , पन्ना-488 446
908. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पुरैना शाखा , पन्ना-488 482
909. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रैपुरा पन्ना शाखा , पन्ना -488 442 910. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सलेहा शाखा , पन्ना-488 511
911. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिमरिया ग्रामीण शाखा , पन्ना-488 442 912. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शाहनगर शाखा , पन्ना 483 501 913. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बडागांव शाखा, टीकमगढ़ 47 2010
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 914. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
-472 111
बल्देवगढ़ शाखा , टीकमगढ़
915. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलेक्ट्रेट शाखा, टीकमगढ़ -472 001
916. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
दिगोदा शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 339
जतारा शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 118 917. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
918. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक जेवर शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 447
919. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
खरगापुर शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 115
920. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक लिधैरा शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 331
921. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
निवाड़ी शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 442
922. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ओरछा प्रतापपुरा शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -471 201
923. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पलेरा शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 221
924. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पृथ्वीपुर शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 336
पुछीकरगंवा स ले शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 446 925. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
926. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
टीकमगढ़ शाखा , टीकमगढ़ -472 001
927. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
प्रशासनिक कार्यालय शाखा ,
ग्वालियर -474 009
928. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए एस ई सी सी ग्वालियर शाखा ,
ग्वालियर -474 011
929. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस ए ए आर सी ग्वालियर शाखा ,
ग्वालियर -474 011
930. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
स्थानीय प्रधान कार्यालय शाखा ,
भोपाल-462 011 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
(Department of Financial Services ) New Delhi , the 10th September , 2010 S.O. 2302 - In pursuance of sub rule 4 of rule 10 of the Official Language use for official purpose of the union rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the listed branches/ offices of the Banks / Insurance Companies in the attached annexure , more than 80% of the staff where of have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi .
Serial
No. of Branches /Offices No.
Name of the Bank/ Insurance Company
930
1
State Bank of India
930
Total
[ F. No. - 11016/5 / 2010 -Hindi ] SURENDER MOHAN NAYYAR, Jt . Director (OL) A List of Offices / Branches to be Notified under the Official Languages Rules , 1976 , Rule 10 ( 4) 1. State Bank of India
Akbarpur ( Kolar Road) Branch , Bhopal - 462 016 2. State Bank of India
Awadhpuri Branch , Bhopal - 462 021
3. State Bank of India
Barkhera Branch, Bhopal -462 021
4. State Bank of India
Berasia Branch , Bhopal -463106
5. State Bank of India
Bhopal Main Branch , Bhopal - 462 003
6. State Bank of India
Dhamarra Village Branch , Bhopal-463101 7. State Bank of India
Govindpura Branch , Bhopal -462 023
8. State Bank of India
Gulmohar Colony Branch , Bhopal -462 039 9. State Bank of India
H.E.T. Branch , Bhopal -462 021
10. State Bank of India
IIFM Branch , Bhopal - 462 003
11. State Bank of India
M.A.C.T. Branch , Bhopal -462 007
12. State Bank of India
M.L.A. Rest House Branch , Bhopal-462 003 13. State Bank of India
M.P. Nagar Branch , Bhopal - 462 011
14. State Bank of India
Mahavir Nagar Branch , Bhopal -462 016 15. State Bank of India
Micro Finance Branch , Bhopal - 462 011
6173 16. State Bank of India
Nayapura ( Kolar Road ) Branch , Bhopal - 462 032 17. State Bank of India Neelbad Branch , Bhopal -462 002
18. State Bank of India
Nehru Nagar Branch , Bhopal -462 038
19. State Bank of India PBB Shahpura Bhopal - 462 016
20. State Bank of India PBB New Market Bhopal -462 003
21. State Bank of India
R.C.E. Branch , Bhopal -462013
22. State Bank of India
Satpura Bhawan Branch , Bhopal - 462 004 23. State Bank of India
Service Branch , Bhopal - 462011
24. State Bank of India
Shivaji Nagar Branch , Bhopal - 462 006
25. State Bank of India
Traders Branch , Bhopal - 462 011
26. State Bank of India
Udayachal Branch , Bhopal - 462011
27. State Bank of India
Vallabh Bhawan Branch , Bhopal -462 004 28. State Bank of India
Vindhyachal Bhawan Branch , Bhopal -462 004 29. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Khilchipur Rajgarh -465 679
30. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Sarangpur , Rajgarh -465 697
31. State Bank of India
Biaora Branch , Rajgarh - 465 674
32. State Bank of India
Jeerapur Branch , Rajgarh - 465 691
33. State Bank of India
Narsinghgarh Branch , Rajgarh - 465 669
34. State Bank of India
Pachore Branch, Rajgarh - 465 683
35. State Bank of India
Rajgarh Branch , Rajgarh - 496 001
36. State Bank of India
Anjad Branch , Barwani - 451 556
37. State Bank of India
Barwani Branch , Barwani -451 551
38. State Bank of India
Chatli Village Branch , Barwani - 451 669
39. State Bank of India
Niwali Village Branch , Barwani -451 667 6174
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
40. State Bank of India
Palsood Village Branch , Barwani - 451435 41. State Bank of India
Rajpur Branch , Barwani - 451447
42. State Bank of India
Sendhwa Branch , Barwani - 451666
43. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Burhanpur Burhanpur - 450331
44. State Bank of India
Burhanpur Branch , Burhanpur - 450331
45. State Bank of India
Mandi Chowk Burhanpur Branch , Burhanpur -450331
46. State Bank of India
Nepanagar Branch , Burhanpur - 450221
47. State Bank of India
Shahpur Branch , Burhanpur - 450331
48. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Harda , Harda -461331
49. State Bank of India
Harda Branch , Harda -461331
50. State Bank of India
Khirkiya Branch , Harda - 461441
51. State Bank of India
Sirali Branch , Harda - 461335
52. State Bank of India
Timarni Branch , Harda -461228
53. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Seoni Malwa Hoshangabad - 461221 54. State Bank of India
Seoni Malwa Branch , Hoshangabad - 461223 55. State Bank of India
Sheopur Branch , Hoshanbabad - 461225 56. State Bank of India
Anand Nagar Khandwa Branch, Khandwa - 450001 57. State Bank of India
CivilLines Khandwa Branch , Khandwa - 450001 58. State Bank of India
Harsud Branch , Khandwa- 450116
59. State Bank of India
Khalwa Branch , Khandwa- 450117
60. State Bank of India
Khandwa Branch , Khandwa - 450001
61. State Bank of India
Lal Chowki Khandwa Branch , Khandwa - 450001 62. State Bank of India
Narmada Nagar ( Punasa ) Branch , Khandwa - 450114
63. State Bank of India
Sihada Branch , Khandwa- 450992
64. State Bank of India
Barwah Branch, Khargone - 451115
65. State Bank of India
Bediya Branch , Khargone - 451113
66. State Bank of India
Bhikangaon Branch , Khargone - 451331
67. State Bank of India
Jawahar Marg Khargone Branch ,
Khargone-451001
68. State Bank of India
Kasrabad Branch , Khargone - 451228
69. State Bank of India
Khargone Branch , Khargone - 451001
70. State Bank of India
Maheshwar Branch , Khargone - 451224
71. State Bank of India
Sanavad ( Dhakalgaon Village Branch ) Khargone- 451111
72. State Bank of India
Segaon Branch , Khargone - 451442
73. State Bank of India
Alirajpur Branch, Alirajpur - 457887
74. State Bank of India
Dhamnod Branch , Dhar- 454552
75. State Bank of India Dhar Branch , Dhar - 454001
76. State Bank of India
Kukshi Branch , Dhar - 454331
77. State Bank of India
Manawar Branch , Dhar - 454443
78. State Bank of India
Pithampur Branch , Dhar - 472336
79. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Sanwer Indore - 453551
80. State Bank of India
Annapurna Road Indore Branch , Indore - 452002 81. State Bank of India
Basant Vihar Colony Branch , Indore - 452001 82. State Bank of India
C.S.W.T. BSF . Campus Branch , Indore - 452005 83. State Bank of India
Collectorate Branch , Indore - 452001
84. State Bank of India
Depalpur Branch , Indore - 453115
85. State Bank of India
Godha Colony Branch , Indore - 452004 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
86. State Bank of India
Harsola Branch , Indore - 453441
87. State Bank of India
I.E. Branch , Indore -452003
88. State Bank of India
Indore City Branch , Indore - 452003 89. State Bank of India
Jamli Village Branch , Indore -453643 90. State Bank of India
Jawahar Marg Branch , Indore -452001 91. State Bank of India
Khandwa Road Branch , Indore - 452017 92. State Bank of India
M. G. Road Market Branch , Indore -452007 93. State Bank of India
M.G. Road Branch, Indore - 452002 94. State Bank of India
Manik Bagh Road Branch , Indore - 452001 95. State Bank of India
Mhow Branch , Indore - 453441
96. State Bank of India
MPSEB Branch , Indore -452001
97. State Bank of India
Neel Kanth Branch , Indore -452006 98. State Bank of India
Old Palasia Branch , Indore - 452001 99. State Bank of India
PBB Vijay Nagar Indore , Indore - 452003 100. State Bank of India
PBB Y N Road Indore , Indore - 452003 101. State Bank of India
Prakash Nagar Branch , Indore - 452001 102. State Bank of India
Rau Branch , Indore - 453331
103. State Bank of India
RNT Marg Branch , Indore , Indore - 452001 104. State Bank of India
S.M.E. Branch , Indore , Indore - 452003 105. State Bank of India
Sapna Sangeeta Indore , Indore -452001 106. State Bank of India
Service Branch , Indore , Indore - 452001 107. State Bank of India
Sukhniwas Branch , Indore , Indore - 452012 108. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Thandla Jhabua - 457777
109. State Bank of India
Jhabua Branch , Jhabua - 457661
6175
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
110. State Bank of India
Meghnagar Branch , Jhabua - 457779
111. State Bank of India
Petlawad Branch , Jhabua - 457773
112. State Bank of India
Ranapur Branch , Jhabua -457993
113. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Amla Betul -460551
114. State Bank of India
Adarsh Dhanora Village Branch , Betul -460330 115. State Bank of India
AFS Amla Branch , Betul -460553
116. State Bank of India
Athner Branch, Betul -460110
117. State Bank of India
Betul Branch , Betul - 460001
118. State Bank of India
Bhainsdehi Branch , Betul -460220
119. State Bank of India
Bodki Village Branch , Betul - 460553
120. State Bank of India
Chicholi Branch , Betul -460330
121. State Bank of India
Chirapatla Branch , Betul - 460330
122. State Bank of India
Chuna Hazuri Branch , Betul -460330
123. State Bank of India
Deshawadi Branch , Betul - 460440
124. State Bank of India
Kolgaon Village Branch , Betul - 460002
125. State Bank of India
Kothi Bazar Betul Branch , Betul-460001 126. State Bank of India
Multai Branch , Betul - 460661
127. State Bank of India
Nanda Branch , Betul -460330
128. State Bank of India
Pathakhera Branch , Betul - 460449
129. State Bank of India
Prabhatpattan Village Branch , Betul - 460665 130. State Bank of India
Sadar Betul Branch , Betul - 460001
131. State Bank of India
Sarni Branch , Betul -460447
132. State Bank of India
Shahpura Betul , Betul -460440
133. State Bank of India
Shobhapur Branch , Betul -460449 6176
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
134. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Chhindwara , Chhindwara -480001 135. State Bank of India
Amarwara Branch , Chhindwara -480221 136. State Bank of India
Ambhara Branch , Chhindwara - 480551 137. State Bank of India
Barkuhi Branch , Chhindwara - 480441 138. State Bank of India
Bhamori Village Branch , Chhindwara -480449 139. State Bank of India
Bichhua Branch , Chhindwara - 480111 140. State Bank of India
Boregaon Branch , Chhindwara - 480106 141. State Bank of India
Chandameta Branch , Chhindwara - 480447 142. State Bank of India
Chhindwara Branch , Chhindwara -480001 143. State Bank of India
Chikhalikalan Branch , Chhindwara - 480557 144. State Bank of India
Chourai Branch , Chhindwara - 480115 145. State Bank of India
Damua Branch , Chhindwara -480555
146. State Bank of India
Ganj Area Chhindwara , Chhindwara - 480001 147. State Bank of India
Gurraiya Branch , Chhindwara -480332 148. State Bank of India
Junnardeo Branch , Chhindwara - 480551 149. State Bank of India
Kamathi ( Sawri Bazar ) Sab , Chhindwara -480331 150. State Bank of India
Mohkhed Branch , Chhindwara - 480228 151. State Bank of India
Pandhurna Branch , Chhindwara - 480334 152. State Bank of India
Parasia Branch , Chhindwara -480441
153. State Bank of India
PBB Chhindwara Chhindwara -480001 154. State Bank of India
Prasanna Vihar Colony Branch ,,
Chhindwara -480441
155. State Bank of India
Rawanwara Branch ,
Chhindwara -480441
156. State Bank of India
Sausar Branch , Chhindwara - 480106
[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 157. State Bank of India
Umranala Branch , Chhindwara -480107
158. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Bagli , Dewas -455227
159. State Bank of India
Dewas Branch , Dewas -455001
160. State Bank of India
PBB Dewas , Dewas -455001
161. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Laduna , Mandsaur - 458489
162. State Bank of India
Botalganj Branch , Mandsaur - 458664
163. State Bank of India
Krishi Upaj Mandi BR Mandsaur , Mandsaur-458001
164. State Bank of India
Mandsaur Branch ,, Mandsaur - 458001
165. State Bank of India
Kanawati Branch ,, Neemuch - 458441
166. State Bank of India
Neemuch Branch ,, Neemuch - 456006
167. State Bank of India
Vikram Nagar ( Damodarpura ) Branch ,,
Neemuch -458330
168. State Bank of India
Basindra Branch ,, Ratlam - 457001
169. State Bank of India
Collectorate Ratlam Branch ,, Ratlam -457001 170. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch , Ratlam , Ratlam -457001 171. State Bank of India
DRM Office , Ratlam Branch , Ratlam -457001 172. State Bank of India
Jaora Branch ,, Ratlam -457226
173. State Bank of India
Kunda ( Sab ) Ratlam - 457551
174. State Bank of India
NRI BE Ratlam Branch ,, Ratlam -457001
175. State Bank of India
PBB Ratiam , Ratlam- 457001
176. State Bank of India
Ratlam Branch , Ratlam-457001
177. State Bank of India
Shivpur Village Branch , Ratlam-457115 178. State Bank of India
Agar Branch , Shajapur - 465002
179. State Bank of India
Akodia Mandi Branch , Shajapur - 465223 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
6177
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
204. State Bank of India
180. State Bank of India
Maksi Nagar Branch , Shajapur - 465106 Dandia Branch , Raisen -464881
205. State Bank of India
181. State Bank of India
Mandoda Sab , Shajapur- 465226 Deori Branch, Raisen -464774
206. State Bank of India
182. State Bank of India
Nalkhera Branch , Shajapur -465445 Gairatganj Branch , Raisen - 464884
207. State Bank of India
183. State Bank of India
Shajapur Branch, Shajapur - 465001 Mandideep Branch , Raisen - 462046
208. State Bank of India
184. State Bank of India
Shujalpur Branch , Shajapur - 465331 Obedullaganj Branch , Raisen-464993
209. State Bank of India
185. State Bank of India
Susner Branch, Shajapur -465447 Raisen Branch , Raisen - 464551
210. State Bank of India
186. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Khachrod , Ujjain -456224 187. State Bank of India
Badnagar Branch , Ujjain - 456771 188. State Bank of India
Chimanganj Mandi Ujjain, Ujjain -456001 189. State Bank India
Harsodan Viilage Branch , Ujjain -456010 190. State Bank of India
Ingoria Village Branch , Ujjain - 456222 191. State Bank of India
JaithalVillage Branch . Ujjain -456006 192. State Bank of India
Madhav Nagar Ujjain , Ujjain -456001 193. State Bank of India
Mahidpur Branch , Ujjain - 456443 194. State Bank of India
Nagda Branch , Ujjain -456335
195. State Bank of India
Nai Sarak Ujjain , Ujjain -456006 196. State Bank of India
Narwar Branch , Ujjain - 456664
197. State Bank of India
Nayapura Ujjain , Ujjain -456006 198. State Bank of India
Sarafa Ujjain , Ujjain -456006
199. State Bank of India
Tarana Branch , Ujjain -456665
200: State Bank of India
Ujjain Main Branch, Ujjain - 456001 201. State Bank of India
A.D.B Bareli , Raisen - 464668
202. State Bank of India
Badi Branch , Raisen - 464665
203. State Bank of India
Begumganj Branch , Raisen - 464881 3484 6 /10-5
Salamatpur Branch , Raisen - 464651
211. State Bank of India
Seermau Branch , Raisen -464886
212. State Bank of India
Silwani Branch , Raisen -464886
213. State Bank of India
Simariya Khurd Branch , Raisen -464671 214. State Bank of India
Udaipura Brauch . Raisen - 46-4770
215. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Sehore Branch , Sehore -466001
216. State Bank of India
Astha Branch , Sehore-466116
217. State Bank of India
Baktara Branch , Sehore -466-440
218. State Bank of India
Bayan Village Branch , Sehore- 466441
219. State Bank of India
Bilkisganj Village Branch , Sehore - 466111 220. State Bank of India
Budhni Branch , Schore - 466445
221 State Bank of India
Dobi Village Branch , Schore-466554
222. State Bank of ladha
Jenhawar Branch. Sehore -466115
State Bank of India
JawaBranch, Schore -465221
224. State Bank of India
Kaned Meji Branch. Sebere- 106116
225. State Bank of India
Kethri Branch , Seho16611
226. State Bank of India
Larkui Village Branch , Senore - 4663.1
227. State Bank of India
Nasrullagaj Branch , Schora --466331 6178
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
228. State Bank of India
Rethi Branch , Sehorc- 466446
229. State Bank of India
Sehore Branch , Sehore - 466001
230. State Bank of India
Shyampur Branch , Sehore - 466651
231. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Vidisha , Vidisha - 464001
232. State Bank of India
Atari Khejra Branch , Vidisha - 464331
233. State Bank of India
Barwai Village Branch , Vidisha - 464224 234. State Bank of India
Ganj Basoda Branch , Vidisha- 464221
235. State Bank of India
Khamkheda Branch , Vidisha- 464226
236. State Bank of India
Kurwai Branch , Vitisha -464224
237. State Bank of India
Lateri Branch , Vidisha -464114
238. State Bank of India
Sati Vidisha Branch ; Vidisha -464001
239. State Bank of India
Sironj E ranch , Vidisha - 464228
240. State Bank of India
3 EME Centre Bairagarh Branch , Bhopal -462031 241. State Bank of India
Airport Road Branch , Bhopal - 462036
242. State Bank of India
Ayodhya Nagar Branch , Bhopal - 462023 243. State Bank of India
Bagh Mugalia Branch , Bhopal - 462026 244. State Bank of India
Bairagarh Main Market Branch , Bhopal - 46203 1 245. State Bank of India
Bhel Plant Area Branch , Bhopal - 462922 246. State Bank of India
Bhopal University Branch , Bhopal -462026 247. State Bank of India
BPI . Memorial Hosp . & Research Centre Branch , Bhopal-462038
248. State Bank of India
Chandbarh Branch , Bhopal - 462010
249. State Bank of India
Chola Road Branch , Bhopal - 462001
250. State Bank of India
CIAE Branch , Bhopal -462038
251. State Bank of India
DRM office Branch , Bhopal - 462001
[ PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 252. State Bank of India
Fatehgarh Branch , Bhopal -462001
253. State Bank of India
Gandhi Medical College Branch , Bhopal - 462001 254. State Bank of India
Govt. Business Branch , Bhopal - 462001 255. State Bank of India
Hamidia Road Branch , Bhopal - 462029
256. State Bank of India
Hoshangabad Road ( Misrod ) Branch ,
Bhopal-462026
257. State Bank of India
Jehangirabad Road Branch , Bhopal - 462008 258. State Bank of India
Kasturba Hospital Bhel Branch , Bhopal - 462023 259. State Bank of India
Marwari Road Branch , Bhopal - 462001
260. State Bank of India
Minal Residency Branch , Bhopal - 462023 261. State Bank of India
Municipal Corporation Branch , Bhopal - 462001 262. State Bank of India
Old Secretariat Branch , Bhopal -462001
263. State Bank of India
Royal Market Branch , Bhopal - 462001
264. State Bank of India
S.M.E. Branch , Bhopal - 462023
265. State Bank of India
Sultania Road Branch , Bhopal - 462001
266. State Bank of India
A.D.B Babai Branch , Hoshangabad - 461661 267. State Bank of India
A.D.B Pipariya Branch , Hoshangabad - 461775 268. State Bank of India
Babai Branch , Hoshangabad - 461661
269. State Bank of India
Bankhedi Branch , Hoshangabad- 461003 270. State Bank of India
Hoshangabad Branch , Hoshangabad - 461001 271. State Bank of India
Itarsi Branch , Hoshangabad - 461111
272. State Bank of India
Kesla Branch , Hoshangabad - 461550
273. State Bank of India
Krishnapuri Branch , Hoshangabad - 461001 274. State Bank of India
New Market Itarsi Branch , Hoshangabad - 461111 275. State Bank of India
Pachmarhi Branch , Hoshangabad - 461881 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
276. State Bank of India
6179
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
297. State Bank of India
Pipariya Branch , Hoshangabad - 461775 277. State Bank of India
Bhedaghat Village Branch , Jabalpur - 482053 298. State Bank of India
Semri Harchan ( Kamtee) Branch , Hoshangabad - 461771
Bilhari Mandla Road Branch , Jabalpur - 482020 299. State Bank of India
278. State Bank of India
Sohagpur Branch , Hoshangabad - 461771 Chourai Branch , Jabalpur - 483110
300. State Bank of India
279. State Bank of India
SPM Hoshangabad Branch , Hoshangabad - 461005
280. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch , Jabalpur - 482001
301. State Bank of India Garha Branch , Jabalpur - 482003
302. State Bank of India
Administrative Office Branch , Bhopal - 46201 i 281. State Bank of India
GEC Branch , Jabalpur - 482011
303.
State Bank of India
C.C.P.C. Branch , Bhopal -462011
282. State Bank of India
Centralised Pension Proceessing Centre Branch , Bhopal-462011
Gosalpur Village Branch , Jabaipur -483222 304. State Bank of India GRC Branch , Jabalpur -482001
305. State Bank of India
283. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch , Bhopal -462011
GunCarriage Factory Branch, Jabalpur - 482011 306. State Bank of India
284. State Bank of India
RACPC Branch , Bhopal -462011
Gwarighat Road Branch , Jabalpur - 482008 307. State Bank of India
285. State Bank of India
SMECC Branch , Bhopal -462011
I.E. Adhartal Branch , Jabalpur - 482009
308. State Bank of India
286. State Bank of India
C.C.P.C. Branch , Indore -452001
Imlai Village Branch , Jabalpur - 483110
309. State Bank of India
287. State Bank of India
Indore Branch , Indore - 452001
Jabalpur City Branch , Jabalpur - 482002
310.
State Bank of India
288. State Bank of India
RACPC Branch , Indore -452001
289. State Bank of India
SARC Branch , Indore -452001
Jabalpur Main Branch , Jabalpur - 482001
311. State Bank of India Jawaharganj Branch , Jabalpur - 482002
312. State Bank of India
290. State Bank of India
SMECC Branch , Indore -452001
K.U. Mandi Branch , Jabalpur - 482002
313. State Bank of India
291. State Bank of India
RASECC Branch , Ujjain -456001
Kamla Nehru Nagar Branch , Jabalpur - 482002 314. State Bank of India
292. State Bank of India
Katanga Branch , Jabalpur - 482001
315. State Bank of India
Sadar 01 Signal Training Centre Branch , Jabalpur-482001
293. State Bank of India
Katangi Branch , Jabalpur - 483105
316. State Bank of India
A.D.B Shahpura Branch , Jabalpur -483119 294. State Bank of India
Khinni Village Branch , Jabalpur - 483222
317. State Bank of India
Barela Branch , Jabalpur -491332
295. State Bank of India
Bargi Branch , Jabalpur -482051
296. State Bank of India
Madan Mahal Branch , Jabalpur - 482002
318. State Bank of India Marhatal Branch , Jabalpur - 482002
319. State Bank of India
Barginagar Branch , Jabalpur - 482056
Mazoli Branch , Jabalpur - 483336 [ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
6180
320. State Bank of India
Medical College Branch , Jabalpur - 482003 321. State Bank of India
Milloniganj Branch , Jabalpur- 482002 322. State Bank of India
Nayagaon Rampur Branch, Jabalpur - 482008 323. State Bank of India
Ordnance Factory Khamaria Branch .
Jabalpur-482005
324. State Bank of India
Panagar Branch , Jabalpur -483220
325. State Bank of India
Patan Branch , Jabalpur - 483113
326. State Bank of India
PBB Jabalpur , Jabalpur - 482001
227. State Bank of India
Ponda Village Branch , Jabalpur - 483225 328. State Bank of India
Ranjhi Branch, Jabalpur -482010
329. State Bank of India
Ridge Road Branch , Jabalpur -482001 330. State Bank of India
Service Branch , Jabalpur - 482002
331. State Bank of India
Shakti Nagar Jabalpur ( GCF ) Branch , Jabalpur-483225
332. State Bank of India
Sihora Branch , Jabalpur - 483225
333. State Bank of India
Tularam Chowk Branch , Jabalpur-482002 334. State Bank of India
Baihar Branch , Balaghat - 481111
335. State Bank of India
Balaghat Branch , Balaghat - 481001 336 State Bank of India
Bharweli Village Branch , Balaghat -481102 337. State Bank of India
Bhorgarh Village Branch, Balaghat -481337 338. State Bank of India
Hirri Branch . Balaghat-481115
339. State Bank of India
Kachiwahi Branch , Balaghat- 481332 340. State Bank of India
Katangi Branch, Balaghat-481445 341. State Bank of India
Lalbarha Branch, Balaghat - 481441
342. State Bank of India
Lamta Branch , Balaghat- 481551
343. State Bank of India
Lanjhi Branch , Balaghat - 481222
344. State Bank of India
Linga Village Branch , Balaghat -481001
345. State Bank of India
Malajkhand Branch , Balaghat - 481116
346. State Bank of India
Mehandiwada Village Branch, Balaghat-481302 347. State Bank of India
Mohgaon Branch , Balaghat- 481118
348. State Bank of India
Waraseoni Branch , Balaghat- 481331
349. State Bank of India
Amarpur Village Branch , Dindori - 481666 350. State Bank of India
Dindori Branch , Dindori -481880
351. State Bank of India
Samnapur Village Branch , Dindori -481778 352. State Bank of India
Shahpura Dindori ( Niwas ) Branch , Dindori -481990
353. State Bank of India
Anjaniya Village Branch , Mandla - 481993 354. State Bank of India
Bijadandi Village Branch , Mandla - 486674 355. State Bank of India
Chirai Dongri Branch , Mandia-481662
356. State Bank of India
Mandla Branch , Mandla -481661
357. State Bank of India
Nainpur Branch, Mandla - 481776
358. State Bank of India
Narayanganj Village Branch , Mandla-481662 359. State Bank of India
Niwas Branch , Mandla - 481885
360. State Bank of India
Padav Mandla Branch , Mandla - 481661 361. State Bank of India
Udaipur (Mandla ) Branch , Mandla - 481662 362. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Narsinghpur , Narsinghpur - 487001 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
363. State Bank of India
Banwari Village Branch , Narsinghpur -487660 364. State Bank of India
Chichli Branch , Narsinghpur - 487770 365. State Bank of India
Gadarwara Branch , Narsinghpur - 487551 366. State Bank of India
Gotegaon Branch , Narsinghpur - 487118
6181
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
384. State Bank of India
Amiliki Village Branch , Rewa -486550
385. State Bank of India
Chakghat Village Branch , Rewa - 486226 386. State Bank of India
Dabhaura Branch , Rewa - 486556
387. State Bank of India
G.E.C. Rewa Branch , Rewa -486002
388. State Bank of India
367. State Bank of India
Hospital Road Gadarwara Branch , Narsinghpur -487551
368. State Bank of India
Hanuman Branch , Rewa - 486335
389. State Bank of India
Mauganj Branch , Rewa - 486335
390. State Bank of India
Kareli Branch , Narsinghpur - 487221 369. State Bank of India
Khamariya Branch , Narsinghpur - 487118 370. State Bank of India
Khulari Village Branch , Narsinghpur - 481441 371. State Bank of India
Narsinghpur Branch , Narsinghpur - 487001 372. State Bank of India
Pili Kothi Rewa Branch , Rewa - 486001
391. State Bank of India Rewa Main Branch , Rewa- 486001
392. State Bank of India Rewa City Branch , Rewa -486001
393. State Bank of India Semaria Branch , Rewa -486445
394. State Bank of India
Sainkheda Branch , Narsinghpur - 487661 373. State Bank of India
Sihora ( Bohani ) Village Branch , Narsinghpur - 487441
374. State Bank of India
Suatala Village Branch , Narsinghpur - 487315 SME Rewa Branch , Rewa -486001
395. State Bank of India Teon : Village Branch , Rewa - 486112
396. State Bank of India Amarpatan Branch , Satna- 485775
397. State Bank of India
375. State Bank of India
Barethia Branch , Satna - 485441
398. State Bank of India
Tendukheda Narsinghpur Branch , Narsinghpur-487337
376. State Bank of India
Birla Colony Branch , Satna - 485005
399. State Bank of India
Barghat Branch , Seoni - 480667
377. State Bank of India
Collectorate Branch Satna , Satna - 485001 400. State Bank of India
Chhapara Branch , Seoni - 480884
378. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch , Satna- 485001
401. State Bank of India
Dhanora Village Branch , Seoni - 480998 379. State Bank of India
Jaitwara Branch , Satna - 485221
402. State Bank of India
Ghansore Branch , Seoni - 480997
Madhavgarh Village Branch , Satna- 485115 403. State Bank of India
380. State Bank of India
Keolari Branch , Seoni - 480994
Maihar Branch , Satna - 485771
404. State Bank of India
381. State Bank of India
Lakhnadon Branch , Seoni - 480886
Nagod Branch , Satna - 485-446
405. State Bank of India
382. State Bank of India
Manglipeth Seoni Branch , Seoni - 480661 PBB Satna , Satna- 485001
406. State Bank of India
383. State Bank of India
Seoni Branch , Seoni - 480661
Prism Cement Project Site Mankahari Village Branch , Satna - 485111 6182
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
= THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27, 1932
407. State Bank of India
Ramnagar (Turki ) Branch , Satna -485881 408. State Bank of India
RampurBaghelan Branch , Satna-485115 409. State Bank of India
Satna Main Branch , Satna- 485001
410. State Bank of India
Satna City Branch, Satna- 485001
411. State Bank of India
A.D.B Churhat , Sidhi - 486771
412. State Bank of India
Gorbi Branch, Sidhi -486892
413. State Bank of India
Rajmilan (Koyalkooth ) Branch , Sidhi -486886 414. State Bank of India
Sidhi Branch, Sidhi -486661
415. State Bank of India
Sidhi City Branch , Sidhi -486661
416. State Bank of India
Amlori Branch , Singrauli -486886
417. State Bank of India
Jayant Branch , Singrauli - 486890
418. State Bank of India
Jhingurda Branch , Singrauli - 486889
419. State Bank of India
Morwa Branch , Singrauli -486889
420. State Bank of India
Sasan Branch, Singrauli -486886
421. State Bank of India
Vindhya Nagar STPS Branch , Singrauli -486885 422. State Bank of India
WaidhanBranch , Singrauli - 486886
423. State Bank of India
Amarkantak Branch , Anuppur - 484886 424. State Bank of India
Anuppur Branch , Anuppur - 484224 425. State Bank of India
Bijuri Branch, Anuppur -484440
426. State Bank of India
Jaithari Branch , Anuppur -484330
427. State Bank of India
Jamuna Collery Branch , Anuppur -484444 428. State Bank of India
Karepa Branch, Anuppur -484881
429. State Bank of India
Kotma Branch, Anuppur -484334
430. State Bank of India
Kotma Colliery Branch , Anuppur-484336 431. State Bank of India
Badagaon Viliage Branch , Katni -483010 432. State Bank of India
Barhi Branch , Katni -483770
433. State Bank of India
Bohariband Village Branch , Katni -483330 434. State Bank of India
Deogaon Village Branch, Katni- 483501 435. State Bank of India
Ghanta Ghar Katni ( EVE . BR. ) Branch , Katni-483501
436. State Bank of India Katni Branch , Katni-483501
437. State Bank of India
Katni Branch , Katni - 483501
438. State Bank of India
KatniMarket Branch , Katni -483501
439. State Bank of India
Kymore Branch , Katni -483880
440. State Bank of India
New Katni junction Branch , Katni -483503 441. State Bank of India Niwar Branch, Katni -483442
442. State Bank of India
Ordnace Factory Katni Branch , Katni -483583 443. State Bank of India
PBB Branch , Katni -483501
444. State Bank of India
Pipariyakalan Village Branch , Katni -483770 445. State Bank of India Rithi Branch , Katni -483990
446. State Bank of India
Sleemnabad Village Branch, Katni -483440 447. State Bank of India
SME Katni Branch, Katni - 483501
448. State Bank of India
Umariapan Village Branch ,
Katni -483332
449. State Bank of India
Vijayraghavagarh Village Branch,
Katni-483775 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
450. State Bank of India
Vilait Kalan (Bhajiya Village Branch ) ,
Katni-483773
451. State Bank of India
Amlai Branch , Shahdol - 484117
452. State Bank of India
Bansagar Dam Deoland Branch , Shahdol - 484776 453. State Bank of India
Beohari Branch , Shahdol -484774
454. State Bank of India
Dhanpuri Branch , Shahdol -484114
455. State Bank of India
Jaisinghnagar Branch , Shahdol - 484771 456. State Bank of India
Lalpur Burhar Branch , Shahdol - 484110 457. State Bank of India
Market Area Shahdol Branch , Shahdol - 484001 458. State Bank of India
Rajendra Colony Branch , Shahdol -484110 459. State Bank of India
Shahdol Branch , Shahdol -484001
460. State Bank of India
Singhpur Branch , Shahdol 484010
461. State Bank of India
Chandia Branch, Umaria -484660
462. State Bank of India
Manpur Village Branch , Umaria 484665 463. State Bank of India
Market Area Umaria Branch , Umaria - 484661 464. State Bank of India
Nowrozabad Branch, Umaria-484555
465. State Bank of India
Pali Branch , Umaria -484551
466. State Bank of India
Shahpur Village Branch , Umaria -484551 467. State Bank of India
Umaria Branch , Umaria -484661
468. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Damoh , Damoh -470661
469. State Bank of India
Abhana Branch , Damoh -470662
470. State Bank of India
Batiagarh Branch , Damoh -470673
471. State Bank of India
Damoh Branch , Damoh - 470661
472. State Bank of India
Damoh City Branch , Damoh -470661
473. State Bank of India
Deodongra Branch , Damoh -470772
6183 474. State Bank of India
Futera Kalan Village Branch , Damoh -470674 475. State Bank of India Hatta Branch , Damoh -470775
476. State Bank of India Hindoria Branch , Damoh - 470771
477. State Bank of India
Hinotakalan Village Branch , Damoh - 470775 478. State Bank of India Jabera Branch , Damoh - 470881
479. State Bank of India
Khanderi ( SAB ) , Damoh -470666
480. State Bank of India
Kindrho Sab , Damoh - 470666
481. State Bank of India
Narsinghgarh Branch , Damoh - 470675
482. State Bank of India
Patera Branch , Damoh - 470772
483. State Bank of India Patharia Branch , Damoh - 470666
484. State Bank of India
Patna Raja Branch . Damoh - 470901
485. State Bank of India
Sanga Branch , Damon-4-0880
486. State Bank of India
Tendukhera Branch , Damoh - 470880
487. State Bank of India
Agasod Distt , Branch , Saugor - 470113
488. State Bank of India
Bada Bazar Branch, Saugor 470002
489. State Bank of India
Banda (Balai ) Branch , Saugor-470335
490. State Bank of India
Bandri Village Branch , Saugor -470442 491. State Bank of India
Bina Branch , Saugor - 470113
492. State Bank of India Civil Lines Branch , Saugor - 470001
493. State Bank of India
Deori Branch , Saugor - 470226
494. State Bank of India
Dhana Branch , Saugor - 470228
495. State Bank of India
Garhakota Branch , Saugor- 470229
496. State Bank of India
Gopalganj Branch , Saugor - 470001
497. State Bank of India
Jaisinagar Branch , Saugor - 470125 6184
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
498. State Bank of India
Khuraj Branch , Saugor - 470117
499. State Bank of India
Mahar Regimental Centre Branch , Saugor- 470001 500. State Bank of India
Makronai Branch , Saugor- 470004
501. State Bank of India
Mandi Bamora Branch , Saugor - 470111 502. State Bank of India
Medical College Branch , Saugor - 170001 503. State Bank of India
Rahatgarh Branch , Saugor - 461251
504. State Bank of India
Rasmecc Cum Sarc Branch , Saugor- 470001 505. State Bank of India
Rehli Sarc Branch , Saugor - 470227
506. State Bank of india
Saugor Main Bianch , Saugor - 470002
507. State Bank of India
Saugor University Branch , Saugor - 470003 508. State Bank of India
Semdhana Branch , Saugor - 470120
509. State Bank of India
Shahgarh Branch , Saugor - 470339
510. State Bank of India
Shahpur (Ganeshganj ) Branch , Saugor - 470669 511. State Bank of India
SME Saugor Branch , Saugor- 470002
512. State Bank of India
Administratrive Office Jabalpur - 482002 513. State Bank of India
CCPC Jabalpur , Jabalpur -482002
514. State Bank of India
Rase CPC Jabalpur , Jabalpur - 482001
515. State Bank of India
Sarc Jabalpur , Jabalpur - 482002
516. State Bank of India
Chhati Village Branch , Dhamtari - 493663 517. State Bank of India
Collectorate Dhamtari Branch , Dhamtari- 493773 518. State Bank of India
Dhamtari Branch , Dhamtari - 493773
519. State Bank of India
Kurud Branch , Dhamtari - 493663
520. State Bank of India
Nagri Branch , Dhamtari - 493778
521. State Bank of India
Bagbahara Branch , Mahasamund -493449
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) | 522. State Bank of India
Bamhni Sab , Mahasamund - 493445
523. State Bank of India
Bichhiya Sab Branch , Mahasamund - 493558 524. State Bank of India
Kauhakuda Branch , Mahasamund - 493551 525. State Bank of India
Mahasamund Branch , Mahasamund - 493445 526. State Bank of India
Pithora Branch , Mahasamund - 493551
527, State Bank of India
Saraipali ( Chivra KTA ) Branch ,
Mahasamund- 493558
528. State Bank of India
Agrasen Chowk , Raipur -492001
520. State Bank of India
Akansha Branch , Pachpedi Naka Raipur , Raipur-492001
530. State Bank of India
SP Housing Finance Branch , Raipur - 492001 531. State Bank of India
G. C. E. T. Branch , Raipur -492882
532. State Bank of India
Kutchery Branch , Raipur - 492001
533. State Bank of India
New Shanti Nagar Branch , Raipur - 492001 534. State Bank of India
P. B. B. Raipur , Raipur - 492001
535. State Bank of India
Pandritarai K.U.M. Branch , Raipur - 492004 536. State Bank of India
PBB Choubey Colony , Raipur - 492010
537. State Bank of India
Phaphadih Branch , Raipur - 492009
538. State Bank of India
Pragati Branch . Raipur , Raipur -492001
539. State Bank of India
R. S. University Branch , Raipur - 492010 540. State Bank of India
Raipur Main Branch , Raipur - 492001
541. State Bank of India
Ramsagar Para Branch , Raipur - 492001
542. State Bank of India
S. M. E. Branch , Raipur , Raipur -492001
543. State Bank of India
Sachivalaya Branch , Raipur - 492001
544. State Bank of India
Service Branch , Raipur , Raipur - 492001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
545. State Bank of India
Shastri Market Branch, Raipur -492001 546. State Bank of India
Smecc Branch , Raipur -492001
6185
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
568. State Bank of India
MPEB Branch , Korba- 495681
569. State Bank of India
N.T.P. C. Jamnapalli Branch , Korba - 495450 570. State Bank of India
547. State Bank of India
SP Govt . Business Branch , Raipur - 492001 Niharika, Branch , Korba -491681
571. State Bank of India
548. State Bank of India
SunderNagar Branch , Raipur -492001 549. State Bank of India
Telebandha Branch , Raipur-492006 Ompur Village Branch, Korba -495683
572. State Bank of India
Pali Village Branch, Korba-495445
573. State Bank of India
550. State Bank of India
VIP Estate Branch , Raipur-497001 551. State Bank of India
W. R. S. Colony Branch, Raipur -492001 Pondi Uprora Village Branch , Korba - 495444 574. State Bank of India RBO Korba, Korba -495677
575. State Bank of India
552. State Bank of India
Balco Township Branch , Korba- 495682 S. E. C. L. Branch , Korba - 495679
576. State Bank of India
553. State Bank of India
Balgi Project Branch , Korba-495455 Urja Branch, Korba - 495674
577. State Bank of India
554. State Bank of India
Bankimogra Branch , Korba-495447 West Branch , Korba -495680
578. State Bank of India
555. State Bank of India
Barapali Branch , Korba -495674 Baikunthpur Branch , Koriya- 497335
579. State Bank of India
556. State Bank of India
Delawdih Branch , Korba-495445 Bartunga Branch , Koriya -497449
580. State Bank of India
557. State Bank of India
Dipika Branch , Korba - 495677
Chirimiri Branch , Koriya -497449
581. State Bank of India
558. State Bank of India
Gevera Branch , Korba-495452
Churcha Branch, Koriya- 497339
582. State Bank of India
559. State Bank of India
H.T.P.S. Korba Branch , Korba- 495681 Janakpur Branch. Koriya- 497778
583. State Bank of India
560. State Bank of India
I.T.I. Colony Rampur Korba Branch Khongapani Branch, Koriya - 497447
584. State Bank of India
Korba-495667
561. State Bank of India
Kurasia Branch , Koriya - 497553
585. State Bank of India
Katghora Branch , Korba -495445 562. State Bank of India
Manendragarh Branch , Koriya -497442 586. State Bank of India
Korba Main Branch , Korba- 495677 363. State Bank of India
Ambikapur Branch , Surguja -4970
587, State Bank of India
Korba City Branch , Korba -495677 564. State Bank of India
hikapur City Branch , Surgu 2001 588. State Bank of India
Kusumunda Branch , Korba - 495454 565. State Bank of India
Batauli Branch , Surguja- 497101
589. State Bank of India
Machadoli Branch , Korba -495453 566. State Bank of India
Bhaiyathan Branch , Surguja- 497231
590. State Bank of India
Manikpur Branch , Korba -495682 567. State Bank of India
Bhatgaon Branch , Surguja - 497235
591. State Bank of India
Morga Village Branch , Korba-495445 3484G / 10-6
Bishrampur Branch . Surguja-497226 6186
THE GAZETTE OF ORA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
592. State Bank of India
[ PART 11-- SEC . 3 ( ii ) 615. State Bank of India
angaja -49700
Collectorate Ambikapur Branch
593. State Bank of India
IFFCO Premnagar Branch . Sarguja -197333 594. State Bank of India
7:27 Kamleshwarpur Branch , Sargel
595. Sate Bank of India
Kusmi Branch , Surguja -49722 "
56. State Bank of India
Parsagudi Branch , Surguja - 497110
597. State Bank of India
497222
Pratappur Branch , Surguja -
598. State Bank of India
Rajpur Branch , Surguja - 4971 !
599. State Bank of India
Ramanujganj Branch , Surguja - 220 600. State Bank of India
Surajpur Branch, Surguja -497224
601. State Bank of India
Wadrafnagar Branch , Surguja- 7225 602. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Balod Durg -491226
603. State Bank of India
ACC Jam Branch , Durg -490024
604. State Bank of India
AlkaDeptl . Store Bhilai Branch , Durg 20006 605. State Bank of India
Balod Branch , Durg -491226
606. State Bank of India
Bemetara Branch , Durg - 491335
607. State Bank of India
Bhardakala Branch , Durg -49127
608 State Bank of India
Bhilai Branch , Durg -490001
609. State Bank of India
Bhilai Camp Area Branch , Dun ..
State Bank of India
Charoda Branch , Durg -4900
ace Bank of India
Pro Jessital Area Branch , Du
612
Bhilai Market Area Bauch , Du
13. State Bank of India
Shilai Steel Plant Area Br12001 614. st. Bank of India
Bhilai
615 State Bank ot ladta
Cobirta Puh. Ding- 4918-5
Dhamdha Eranch . Durg -491331
617 State Bank of India
Dondi Branch , Durg- 491230
618 State Bank of India
Dendi Lohara Branch , Durg - 491771
619. State Bank of India
Durg Branch. Durg- 491001
620. State Bank of India
Cundardehi Brancı, Durg - 491223
521. State Bank of India
I. E. Bhilai Branch , Durg- 490026
622. State Bank of India
Indira Place Bhilai Branch , Durg - 490010 623. State Bank of India
Karesara Sab Branch , Durg- 491335
624. State Bank of India
Kumhari Branch , Durg -490042
625. State Bank of India
Malviya Nagar Durg Branch , Durg- 491001 626. State Bank of India
Maroda Uttai Branch . Durg - 490006
627. State Bank of India
Nandini Township Bhilai Branch , Durg - 490036 628. State Bank of India
Nawagarh Branch , Durg - 491337
629. State Bank of India
P. B. B. Bhilai Branch , Durg - 490026
630. State Bank of India
Patan Branch , Durg- 491111
631. State Bank of India
Rajahara Branch , Durg - 491228
632. State Bank of India
Resali Bhilai Branch, Durg - 490006
633. State Bank of India
S. M. E. Bhilai Branch Durg - 490001
634. State Bank of India
S. M. E. Durg Branch . Durg- 491001
635. State Bank of India
Station Road Durg Branch , Durg -491011 636. State Bank of India
Supela Bhilai Branch , Durg- 490023
637. State Bank of India
Suregaon Sab , Durg- 491225
638. State Bank of India
Temri Village Branch , Durg-491335
639. State Bank of India
Vaishali Nagar Bhilai Branch , Durg- 490023 भारत का रात्र: सितम्बर 18, 2017भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
6187 664, State Bank of India
640. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Rajnandgaon Rajnandgaon - 491441 Awapalli Village Branch , Bijapur - 494447 665. State Bank of India
641. State Bank of India
Chhuria Branch , Rajnandgaon - 491558 Bhairamgarh Village Branch , Bijapur --494443 666. State Bank of India
642. State Bank of India
Collectorate Branch , Rajnandgaon -491441 643. State Bank of India
Bhopalpatnam Branch , Bijapur - 494-1446
657. State Bank of India
Dongargaon Branch , Rajnandgaon -4916 644. State Bank of India
Bijapur Branch , Bijapur - 494444
668 State Bank of India
Gandai Pandharia Branch , Rajnandgao 645. State Bank of India
Naimed Branch . Bijapur -494114
669. State Bank of India
491801 Khairagarh Branch , Rajnandgaon -
646. State Bank of India
Bacheli Branch . Dantewada-494553
670. State Bank of Indra
Murmunda Branch , Rajnandgaon - 41 :
647. State Bank of India
Dantewara Branch. Dantewada - 4944.1 , 671. State Bank of India
Rajnandgaon Branch , Rajnandgaon -49144 648. State Bank of India
Geedam sranch , Dantewada -494441
672. State Bank of India
SME Rajnandgaon Branch , Rajnandgaon - 491441 649. State Bank of India
Kirandu ! Branch , Dantewada -494556
673. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Jagdalpur Bastar - 494001
650. State Bank of India
Konta Branch , Dantewada - 494114
674. State Bank of India
Adawal Village Branch , Bastar -494223 651. State Bank of India
Bajawand Village Branch , Bastar - 494221 652. State Bank of India
Bakawand Village Branch , Bastar -494222 653. State Bank of India
Bastar Village Branch , Bastar - 494223
654. State Bank of India
Bhanpuri Village Branch , Bastar -494224 655. State Bank of India
Collectorate Jagdalpur Branch , Bastar - 494001 656. State Bank of India
Jagdalpur Branch , Bastar -494001
657. State Bank of India
Kesarpal Sab , Bastar - 494224
658. State Bank of India
Keshkal Branch , Bastar - 494331
659. State Bank of India
Kondagaon Branch, Bastar- 494226
660. State Bank of India
Lohandiguda Village Branch , Bastar - 494010 661. State Bank of India
Pharasgaon Branch , Bastar - 494228
662. State Bank of India
SME Jagdalpur Branch , Bastar - 494001 663. State Bank of India
Tokapal Branch, Bastar - 494442
AMPEB Colony Bodhghat Branch ,
Dantewada -494441
675. State Bank of India
Nakulnar Village Branch , Dantewada - 494552 676. State Bank of India
Sukma Branch , Dantewada - 494111
677. State Bank of India
Artagarh Branch , Kanker - 494665
678. State Bank of India
Asulkhar Sab Kanker - 494669
679. Stare Bank of India
urgaon Sab Kanker - 494334
680. State Bank of India
Bande Village Branch. Kanker - 494777
681. State Bank of India
Bhanupratappur Branch , Kanker - 494669 682. State Bank of India
Charama Branch , Kanker - 494337
683. State Bank of India
Durgkondal Sab Kanker --494669
684 State Bank of India
Kanker Branch . Kanker - 494334
685. State Bank of India
Korar Branch , Kanker - 494670
686. State Bank of India
Narharpur Branch , Kanker - 494333 6188
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
687. State Bank of India
Pakhanjore Branch , Kanker - 494776
688. State Bank of India
Sarona Branch , Kanker -494335
689. State Bank of India
Narainpur Branch , Narainpur - 494661
690. State Bank of India
Chandrahashni Branch, Janjgir - Champa - 495692 591. State Bank of India
Dabra Chowk Branch , Janjgir - Champa - 495688 692. State Bank of India
Bagicha Branch , Jashpur - 496224
693. State Bank of India
Collectorate Branch , Jashpur - 496331
694. State Bank of India
Duldula Branch , Jashpur - 496334
695. State Bank of India
Gajiadih Branch , Jashpur-496220
696. State Bank of India
Jashpurnagar Branch, Jashpur - 496331 697. State Bank of India
Kansabel Branch , Jashpur- 496223
698. State Bank of India
Keradih Sab , Jashpur - 496334
699. State Bank of India
Kotba Branch , Jashpur - 496220
700. State Bank of India
Kunkuri Branch , Jashpur - 496225
701. State Bank of India
Manora Branch, Jashpur - 496330
702. State Bank of India
Pathalgaon Branch , Jashpur - 496118
703. State Bank of India
Sarabkambo Branch , Jashpur- 496224 704. State Bank of India
Tapkara Branch , Jashpur - 496227
705. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Raigarh Raigarh -496001
706. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Sarangarh Raigarh - 496445
707. State Bank of India
Baramkela Branch , Raigarh - 496551
708. State Bank of India
Chakradhar Nagar Branch , Raigarh - 496001 709. State Bank of India
Chhal Branch , Raigarh - 496665
710. State Bank of India
Dharamjaigarh Branch , Raigarh - 496116 711. State Bank of India
Gerwani Branch, Raigarh -496001
712: State Bank of India
Gharghoda Branch , Raigarh - 496111
713. State Bank of India
Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. Patrapali Branch ,, Raigarh -496001
714. State Bank of India
Kabir Chowk Branch , Raigarh- 496001
715. State Bank of India
Kharsia Branch , Raigarh - 496661
716. State Bank of India
Kondatarai Branch , Raigarh - 496100
717. State Bank of India
Lailunga Branch , Raigarh -496113
718. State Bank of India
Lendhra Sab , Raigarh - 496551
719. State Bank of India
PBB Raigarh , Raigarh -496001
720. State Bank of India
Pharsabahar Branch , Raigarh-496242
721. State Bank of India
Pussore Branch , Raigarh - 496440
722. State Bank of India
Raigarh Branch , Raigarh - 496001
723. State Bank of India
Sarangarh Branch , Raigarh - 496445
724. State Bank of India
Sariya Branch , Raigarh -496554
725. State Bank of India
SME Raigarh Branch , Raigarh- 496001
726. State Bank of India
Tamnar Village Branch , Raigarh - 496107 727. State Bank of India
A. D. B. Bilaspur , Bilaspur -495001
728. State Bank of India
Baithalpur Branch , Bilaspur - 495224
729. State Bank of India
Belghana Branch , Bilaspur - 495116
730. State Bank of India
Bilaspur Branch , Bilaspur- 495001
731. State Bank of India
Bilha Branch , Bilaspur -495224
732. State Bank of India
Chakarbhata Branch , Bilaspur-495220
733. State Bank of India
City Branch , Bilaspur - 495001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
734. State Bank of India
Collectorate Branch , Bilaspur -495001 735. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch , Bilaspur - 495001 736. State Bank of India
High Court Branch , Bilaspur - 495001 737. State Bank of India
Kathakoni Village Branch , Bilaspur - 495001 738. State Bank of India
Kota (Bilaspur ) Branch , Bilaspur - 495113 739. State Bank of India
Lakhram Village Branch , Bilaspur -495442 740. State Bank of India
Lormi Branch , Bilaspur - 495115
741. State Bank of India
Marwahi Village Branch , Bilaspur -495118 742. State Bank of India
Masturi Branch, Bilaspur - 495551
743. State Bank of India
Mopka Village Branch , Bilaspur - 495011 744. State Bank of India
Mungeli Branch , Bilaspur -495334
745. State Bank of India
Pachpheri Village Branch , Bilaspur - 495551 746. State Bank of India
Patharia Village Branch , Bilaspur -495335 747. State Bank of India
PBB Bilaspur Branch , Bilaspur -495001 748. State Bank of India
Pendra Road Branch , Bilaspur - 495117 749. State Bank of India
Pendra Village Branch , Bilaspur -495119 750. State Bank of India
Railway Colony Branch , Bilaspur -495004 751. State Bank of India
Raj Kishore Nagar Branch , Bilaspur - 495006 752. State Bank of India
Ratanpur Branch , Bilaspur - 495442
753. State Bank of India
S.E.C.L. Branch , Bilaspur -495001
754. State Bank of India
Sarkanda Branch , Bilaspur - 495001
755. State Bank of India
Shrikant Verma Marg Branch , Bilaspur -495001 756. State Bank of India
Sipat Branch , Bilaspur - 495555
757. State Bank of India
Takhatpur Branch , Bilaspur - 495330
6189
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
758. State Bank of India
Tifra Branch , Bilaspur -495223
759. State Bank of India
Bidora Sab Kawardha - 491995
760. State Bank of India
Bodla Village Branch , Kawardha -491333 761. State Bank of India
Chilphi Village Kawardha -491995
762. State Bank of India
Kawardha Branch , Kawardha - 491195
763. State Bank of India
Pandaria Kawardha - 495337
764. State Bank of India
Rengakhar Kawardha -491888
765. State Bank of India
Sahaspur Lohara Branch , Kawardha -491991 766. State Bank of India
Akaltara Branch , Janjgir - Champa -495552 767. State Bank of India
Baloda Village Branch , Janjgir - Champa -495559 768. State Bank of India
Baradwar Branch , Janjgir - Champa -495687 769. State Bank of India
Champa Branch, Janjgir - Champa -495671 770. State Bank of India
Jaijaipur Village Branch , Janjgir -Champa -495686 771. State Bank of India
Janjgir Branch , Janjgir - Champa - 495668 772. State Bank of India
Kataud Branch , Janjgir - Champa - 495668 773. State Bank of India
Pamgarh Branch , Janjgir - Champa -495554 774. State Bank of India
Parsada Branch , Janjgir - Champa -495663 775. State Bank of India
Sakti Village Branch , Janjgir -Champa -495689 776. State Bank of India
Saragaon Branch , Janjgir - Champa -495221 777. State Bank of India
Seorinarayan Branch , Janjgir - Champa - 495557 778. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Bhatapara Raipur - 493118
779. State Bank of India
Ambuja Cement Rawan Wara Branch , Raipur-493322
780. State Bank of India
Arang Branch, Raipur -493441 6190
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
781. State Bank of India
Baloda Bazar , Raipur -493332
782. State Bank of India
Bhanpuri Branch, Raipur -493221
783. State Bank of India
Bhatapara Branch , Raipur - 493118
784. State Bank of India
Bilaigarh Branch , Raipur -493338
785. State Bank of India
Chhura Branch , Raipur - 493996
786. State Bank of India
Gariaband Branch , Raipur -493009
787. State Bank of India
Gatadih Sab , Raipur - 493559
788. State Bank of India
Grasim Cement Rawan Branch, Raipur -493195 789. State Bank of India
Hirmi Branch , Raipur -493195
790. State Bank of India
Ind . Estate Urla Branch , Raipur - 493221 791. State Bank of India
Kasdol Branch , Raipur -493335
792. State Bank of India
Mandhar Branch , Raipur - 493111
793. State Bank of India
Nawapara Rajim Branch , Raipur -493881 794. State Bank of India
Neora Branch , Raipur - 493114
795. State Bank of India
Rasedih Sab Branch , Raipur - 493332 796. State Bank of India
Rohasi Branch , Raipur - 493228
797. State Bank of India
Simga Branch , Raipur - 493101
798. State Bank of India
Administrative Office Branch , Raipur - 492007 799. State Bank of India
RASECC , Bilaspur , Bilaspur -495001 800. State Bank of India
RASECC Bhilai , Durg -490001
801. State Bank of India
RASECC Korba , Korba -495677
802. State Bank of India
RASMECC Raipur , Raipur -492001
803. State Bank of India
SARC Raipur , Raipur -492001
804. State Bank of India
Ashoknagar Branch , Ashoknagar - 473331 805. State Bank of India
Chanderi Branch , Ashoknagar -473446 806. State Bank of India
Mungawali Branch , Ashoknagar - 473443 807. State Bank of India
Aron Branch, Guna - 473101
808. State Bank of India
Badot Branch , Guna - 473287
809. State Bank of India
Barsat Branch , Guna - 473276
810. State Bank of India
Bavrikhara (NFL Complex ) Branch, Guna - 473111 811. State Bank of India
Binaganj Branch, Guna -473115
812. State Bank of India
Gail Complex Vijaipur Branch , Guna -473112 813. State Bank of India Guna Branch , Guna- 473001
814. State Bank of India
Airport Road Branch , Gwalior -474001 815. State Bank of India
CCPC , Branch , Gwalior -474001
816. State Bank of India
CityCentre Branch , Guna - 474011
817. State Bank of India
Collectorate Branch , Gwalior-474001
818. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch , Gwalior -474001
819. State Bank of India
Drde Branch , Gwalior -474002
820. State Bank of India
G. R.Medical College Branch , Gwalior - 474009 821. State Bank of India
Gwalior Main Branch , Gwalior -474001 822. State Bank of India
Ind . Estate Branch , Gwalior - 474003
823. State Bank of India
Jayendraganj Branch , Gwalior - 474009 824. State Bank of India
Mayur Market Branch , Gwalior - 474011 825. State Bank of India
Mela Road Branch , Gwalior -474002
826. State Bank of India
Morar Branch , Gwalior -474006
827. State Bank of India
Moti Mahal Branch , Gwalior -474007 828. State Bank of India
Naya Bazar Branch , Gwalior - 474001 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
829. State Bank of India
PBB Gwalior , Gwalior -474007
6191 853. State Bank of India Seondha Branch, Datia - 475692
854. State Bank of India
830. State Bank of India
Rambagh Colony Branch, Gwalior -474002 Uchad Village Branch , Datia - 475675
855. State Bank of India
831. State Bank of India
Sheopur Kalan Branch , Sheopurkalan - 476337 832. State Bank of India
Vijaypur Branch, Sheopurkalan -476332 833. State Bank of India
Deharwara Branch , Shivpuri - 473774
834. State Bank of India
Karera Branch , Shivpuri -473660
835. State Bank of India
Khaniadhana Branch , Shivpuri - 473990 836. State Bank of India
Kolaras Branch , Shivpuri -473770
837. State Bank of India
Narwar Branch , Shivpuri -473880
838. State Bank of India
PBB Shivpuri , Shivpuri -473551
839. State Bank of India
Pichor Branch , Shivpuri - 473995
840. State Bank of India
Shivpuri Branch , Shivpuri -473.551
841. State Bank of India
Alampur Branch , Bhind -477449
842. State Bank of India
Bhind Branch , Bhind - 477001
843. State Bank of India
Collectorate Bhind Branch , Bhind -477001 844. State Bank of India
Gohad Branch , Bhind -477116
845. State Bank of India
Lahar Branch , Bhind -477445
846. State Bank of India
Malanpur Industrial Area Branch , Bhind - 477117 847. State Bank of India
Mehgaon Branch , Bhind -477557
848. State Bank of India
A.D.B. Datia , Datia -475661
849. State Bank of India
Bhander Branch , Datia -475335
850. State Bank of India
Datia Branch , Datia - 475661
851. State Bank of India
Indergarh Branch , Datia -475675
852. State Bank of India
Salon Bhitari Village Branch , Datia -475336 B.S.F. Tekanpur Branch , Gwalior - 475005
856. State Bank of India , Bhitatwar Branch , Gwalior - 475220
857. State Bank of India , Billaua Village Branch , Gwalior - 475003
858. State Bank of India , Dabra Branch , Gwalior - 475110
859. State Bank of India , Hastinapur Village Branch , Gwalior - 475002
860. State Bank of India , Karahiya Village Branch , Gwalior - 465220
861. State Bank of India , Kulaith Branch , Gwalior - 474010
862. State Bank of India , Pichhore Branch , Gwalior - 475115
863. State Bank of India , A.D.B Joura Branch. Morena - 476221
864. State Bank of india , A.D.B Sabalgarh Morena -476229
865. State Bank of India , Ambah Branch . Morena - 476444
State Bank of India , Badagaon (Naoli ) Branch , 866.
Morena - 476133
867. State Bank of India , Banmore Branch, Morena - 476444
868. State Bank of India , Besaiya Village Branch , Morena - 476011
865. State Bank of India , Jhundpura Village Branch , Morena - 476226
State Bank of India , Jiwajiganj Mandi ,
870.
Morena Branch ,
Morena - 476001
871. State Bank of India , Kailaras Branch , Morena - 476224
872. State Bank of India , Mangrol Branch , Morena - 476230
873. State Bank of India , Morena Branch , Morena - 476001
874. State Bank of India , Porsa Branch , Morena - 476115
875. State Bank of India , Sabalgarh Branch , Morena - 476229 6192
[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
876. State Bank of India , Sarai Chola Village Branch, Morena - 476001
877. State Bank of India , Thara Village Branch , Morena - 476117
878. State Bank of India, A.D.B Chhatarpur Chhatarpur - 471001
879. State Bank of India , Bada Malhera Branch , Chhatarpur - 471311
880 State Bank of India , Bijawar Branch , Chhatarpur -471405
881. State Bank of India, Buxwaha Branch , Chhatarpur - 471318
882. State Bank of India , Chandla Branch , Chhatarpur - 471525
883. State Bank of India , Chhatarpur Main Branch , Chhatarpur- 471001
884. State Bank of India , Chowk Bazar Branch , Chhatarpur - 471001
885. State Bank of India , Garhi Malhera Branch , Chhatarpur - 471411
886. State Bank of India , Ghuwara Branch , Chhatarpur - 471313
887. State Bank of India , Gulganj Branch , Chhatarpur - 471301
888. State Bank of India , Harpalpur Branch , Chhatarpur - 471111
889. State Bank of India , Khajuraho Branch , Chhatarpur - 471606
890. State Bank of India , Londi Branch , Chhatarpur - 471515
891. State Bank of India , Nowgaon ( BKD ) Branch , Chhatarpur - 471201
892. State Bank of India , Parasaniya Branch , Chhatarpur -471515
893. State Bank of India , Rajnagar Branch , Chhatarpur - 471625
894. State Bank of India , Rangoli ( SAB) Chhatarpur -471408
895. State Bank of India , S.M.E Branch , Chhatarpur Chhatarpur - 471001
896. State Bank of India , Satai Branch , Chhatarpur -471408
897. State Bank of India , Ajaigarh Branch , Panna - 488220
898. State Bank of India , Amanganj Branch , Panna - 488441
899. State Bank of India , Beera Sab Panna - 488220
900. State Bank of India , Devendra Nagar Branch , Panna - 488333
901. State Bank of India , Gunaur Village Branch , Panna - 488050
902. State Bank of India , Harduwahi Branch , Panna - 488050
903. State Bank of India , Kakrahti Branch , Panna - 488050
904. State Bank of India , Majhgawan Village Branch , Panna - 488101
905. State Bank of India , Panna Branch , Panna - 488001
906. State Bank of India , Panna City Branch , Panna - 488001
907. State Bank of India , Pawai Branch , Panna - 488446
908. State Bank of India , Purena Branch , Panna - 488482
909. State Bank of India , Raipura Panna Branch , Panna - 488442
910. State Bank of India , Saleha Branch , Panna - 488511
911. State Bank of India, Semaria Village Branch , Panna - 488442
912. State Bank of India , Shahnagar Branch , Panna - 483501
913. State Bank of India , Badagaon Branch , Tikamgarh - 472010
914. State Bank of India , Baldeogarh Branch , Tikamgarh - 472111
915. State Bank of India , Collectorate Branch , Tikamgarh - 472001
916. State Bank of India , Digoda Branch , Tikamgarh - 472339
917. State Bank of India , Jatara Branch , Tikamgarh - 472118
918. State Bank of India , Jewar Branch , Tikamgarh - 472447
919. State Bank of India , Khargapur Branch , Tikamgarh - 472115
920. State Bank of India , Lidhora Branch , Tikamgarh - 472331
921. State Bank of India , Niwari Branch , Tikamgarh - 472442
922. State Bank of India , Orcha ( Pratappura ) Branch , Tikamgarh -- 471201
923. State Bank of India , Palera Branch , Tikamgarh - 472221
924. State Bank of India , Prothvipur Branch , Tikamgarh - 472336
925. State Bank of India , Puchhikarguwan ( SAB ) Tikamgarh - 472446
926. State Bank of India , Tikamgarh Branch , Tikamgarh -472001
927. State Bank of India , Administrative Office Gwalior -474009
928. State Bank of India , Rasecc Gwalior Gwalior - 474011
929. State Bank of India , Saarc Gwalior Gwalior - 474011
930. State Bank of India , Local Head Office Branch . Bhopal- 462011 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2303.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में आकाशवाणी महानिदेशालय ( सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय ) के निम्नलिखित अधीनस्थ केंद्रों/कार्यालयों , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है :-
1. आकाशवाणी , गोधरा
2. आकाशवाणी, नागपुर
3. आकाशवाणी , गुवाहाटी
4. विदेश प्रसारण सेवा , आकाशवाणी , नई दिल्ली 5. आकाशवाणी , नागरकोडूल
6. आकाशवाणी , चेन्नै
7. आकाशवाणी , कारवार
8. राष्ट्रीय प्रसार सेवा , आकाशवाणी , नई दिल्ली 9. आकाशवाणी , इम्फाल
10. आकाशवाणी , बीकानेर
11. विज्ञापन प्रसारण सेवा , आकाशवाणी , कोलकाता 12. आकाशवाणी , त्रिपुरा
13. आकाशवाणी , ईटानगर
14. आकाशवाणी , पुंछ
15. आकाशवाणी , रीवा
16. आकाशवाणी , भवानीपटना
17. आकाशवाणी , राउरकेला
18. आकाशवाणी , सिलीगुड़ी
19. आकाशवाणी , पौड़ी
20. आकाशवाणी , भटिंडा
21. आकाशवाणी , दीफू
22. विज्ञापन प्रसारण सेवा, कटक
23. उच्च शक्ति प्रेषित्र , आकाशवाणी , अजमेर
24. आकाशवाणी , रत्नागिरी
25. आकाशवाणी , पूर्णिया
26. एम. पी . टी. आकाशवाणी , यलहंका
27. आकाशवाणी , किन्नौर
28. आकाशवाणी , कोटा
29. आकाशवाणी , कोच्चि
30. आकाशवाणी , कठुआ
[फा. सं. ई -11017/6/2010 - हिन्दी] प्रयीम्वदा , निदेशक ( रा.भा. ) 34846-10-7
6193
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
New Delhi , the 25th August , 2010
S.O. 2303. In pursuance of Sub - Rule ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the Union ) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under Directorate General of All India Radio (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting ) , more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :
1. AIR, Godhra
2. AIR, Nagpur
3. AIR , Guwahati
4. External Service Division , AIR , New Delhi 5. AIR, Nagercoil
6. AIR, Chennai
7. AIR, Karwar
8. National Channel , AIR, New Delhi
9. AIR, Imphal
10. AIR, Bikaner
11. CBS , AIR , Kolkata
12. AIR, Tripura
13. AIR, Itanagar
14. AIR, Poonch
15. AIR, Rewa
16. AIR, Bhawanipatna
17. AIR , Raurkela
18. AIR, Siliguri
19. AIR , Paudi
20. AIR, Bhatinda
21. AJR , Diphu
22. CBS , AIR , Cuttack
23. HPT, AIR , Ajmer
24. AIR , Ratnagiri
25. АР. Ригреа
26. SPT. AIR , Yeihanka
27. AIR, Kinnore
28. AIR, Kota
29. AIR . Kochi
30. AIR, Kathua
[ F. No. E - 11017/6/2010 -Hindi ] PRIYAMVADA , Director ( O.L. ) [PAR THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
6194
the Embassy of India , Kuwait to perform the dut Consular Officer with effect from 31st August , 20 [No.T 45304 संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त , 2010
R. K. FERINDIA, Under Ser नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2306.राजनयिक और कांसलीय ऑफिसर ( थ और फीस ) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड अनुसरण में, कंन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्री अमर सिंह, सहार अशोक कुमार महतो, अवर श्रेणी लिपिक को 31-8-2010 के सहायक कांसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के ि प्राधिकृत करती है।
का.आ. 2304.-केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में, सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अंतर्गत आने वाली सॉफ्टवेयर टेक्नोलॉजी पार्क्स ऑफ इंडिया नामक स्वायत संस्था के ऑपटेल एसटीपी बिल्डिंग , इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स कॉम्पलेक्स , परदेशी पुरा , इन्दौर स्थित केन्द्र, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है।
[सं. टी. 43.30 [सं. 7(2 )/2005-हि.अ. ] चन्दन कुमार चटर्जी , संयुक्त निदेशक
आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 31st August, 201 MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATIKUS TECHNOLOGY
and Fees) Act , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Govem
hereby authorize S / Shri Amar Singh, Assistant and As, ra (Department of information Technology )
Kumar Mahto , UDC respectively in the Consulate Geтка New Delhi the 31st August , 2010
ofIndia, Dubai to perform the duties of Assistant to
S.O. 2306. In pursuance of the clause ( the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Officers with effect from 31st Aug. 2010
No.
R. K. PERINDIA , Under Serey नई दिल्ली, 3 सितम्बर , 20 : 0 S.O. 2304. In pursuance of sub - rule(4) ofthe Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the Software Technology Parks of India, an autonomous society under the administrative control of the Department of Information Technology , located at Optel STP Building , Electronics Complex, Pardesi Pura, Indore , more than 80 % staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi .
[No. 7 (2 )/2005-H.S. ] C. K. CHATTERJEE, Jt . Director
स का.आ. 2307 -राजनयिक और कॉमलीय और फीस) के अधिरियम , 1948की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्रीमति ताजेन्दर कौर भाटिया, ए. को 3-9-2010 ये रत भो हाई कमिशन , ओटावा में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्य। का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करतो है।
[सं. टी. 4330/1/2006 ] विदेश मंत्रालय (सीपीवी प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त. 2010
आर. के. पेरिनडिया अवर सचिव ( कास्य) New Delhi the 3rd September , 2010 का.आ. 2305.-राजनयिक और कोंसलीप ऑऑफिसर ( शपथ और फीस ) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनग्गण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री मनोज कम्मर मंडल सहायक को 31-8-2010 से भारत के राजदूतावास , कुवेत में सहायक कोसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है।
S.O. 2307. In pursuance of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers andfees ) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948 ), the Central Goverir.ent hereby authorise M/s . Tejinder Kaur Bhatia , PA in the High Commission of India , Ottawa to perform the auties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect froin 3rd September. 2010.
[मं. टी. 4330/1/2006 आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव ( कोंगुलर)
[No T. 4330 01/2006) R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy. ( Consular ) नई दिल्ली, 7 सितम्बर , 2010 MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (C.P.V. Division) New Delhi the 31st August, 2010
का.आ. 2308.- राजनयिक ओर कांसलीय ऑफिगर ( शपथ और फीस ) के अधिनियम , 1948 को चारा 2 के खंड ( क ) क अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्रीमति पनचाली दाम गहायक S.O. 2305. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees ) Act , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Manoj Kumar Mandal , Assistant in [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
को 7-9-2010 से भारत के राजदूतावास , कुवेत में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है।
[सं. टी. 4330/1/2006] आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव ( कोंसुलर ) New Delhi the 7th September, 2010 S.O. 2308.-In pursuance of the clause ( a ) cf the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act. 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Smt . Panchali Das , Assistent in the Embassy of India , Kuwait to perform the duties on Assistant Consular Officer with effect ' from 7th September, 2.0.
[ No. T. 4030/01/2006] R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy Consular) विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय ( विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 6 सितम्बर , 2010
का.आ. 2309, केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में विज्ञान और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय के स्वायत्त शासी संस्थान " आर्यभट्ट प्रेक्षण विज्ञान शोध संस्थान , नैनीताल " को जिनक ३० प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।
[सं. ई. 11028 / 1 / 2005 - हिन्दी]
प्रेम सिंह , संयुक्त निदेशक ( रा.भा. ) MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Department of Science & Technology ) New Delhi the 6th September , 2010 S.O. 2309. In pursuance of sub rule ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for Official purposes of the Union ) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the Autonomous Institute " ARYABHATTA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCES , NAINITAL " of Ministry of Science and Technology the 80 % and more percent staff where of have acquired working knowledge of Hindi .
[ F. No. - 11028 /1 / 2005 ( O.L. ) ]
PREM SINGH , Jt . Director ( O.L. ) स्वास्थ्यएवं परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ( स्वास्थ्यएवं परिवार कल्याण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2310.- भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा ।। की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार , भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करके , संबद्ध विश्वविद्यालय के नाम में परिवर्तन के कारण उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , नामतः
6195
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भार 27 , 1932
उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " एच . एन . बी. गढ़वाल विश्वविद्यालय , उत्तरांचल " के समक्ष और उसके लिए प्रविष्टि " एच आई एच टी विश्वविद्यालय , देहरादून " को मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता शीर्षक (इसके बाद कालम ( 2 ) के रूप में निर्दिष्ट ) के अन्तर्गत " एचआईएचटी विश्वविद्यालय " के प्रति पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षिप्त रूप ( इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में निर्दिष्ट ) शीर्षक के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित को अंतर्विष्ट किया जाएगा, नामतः-
डीए डिप्लोमा इन एनेस्थीसिया
डिप्लोमा इन चाइल्ड हैल्थ
डोसीएच
डीसीपी डिप्लोमा इन क्लिनिकल पैथोलोजी
डीजीओ डिप्लोमा इन ओब्सटेट्रिक्स एंड
गायनोकोलोजी
डी- आर्थो डिप्लोमा इन ओर्थेपैडिक्स
डीएमआरडी डिप्लोमा इन मैडिकल रेडियो डायग्नोसिस
एमडी डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( एनेस्थिसियोलोजी )
(एनेस्थिसियोलोजी)
एमडी ( बायोकैमिस्ट्री) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( बायोकैमिस्ट्री )
डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( जनरल मेडिसिन ) एमडी(जनरल मेडिसिन ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( माइक्रोबायोलोजी ) एमडी( माइक्रोबायोलोजी )
एमडी ( पैडिएट्रिक्स ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( पैडिएट्रिक्स )
एमडी (पैथोलोजी) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( पैथोलोजी )
डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( फार्माकोलोजी) एमडी (फार्माकोलोजी ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( फिजियोलोजी ) एमडी ( फिजियोलोजी ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन
(रेडियो- डायग्नोसिस/रेडियोलोजी ) एमडी ( रेडियो- डायग्नोसिस/रेडियोलोजी )
एमडी ( एस.पी.एम. /
कम्युनिटी मेडिसिन ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सोशल एंड प्रोवेन्टिव मेडिसिन कम्युनिटी
मेडिसिन)
डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन मास्टर ऑफ एमडी/एमएस ( एनटाभी ) सर्जरी ( एनाटामी)
डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन /मास्टर
एमडी/एमएस ( ओबीजी ) ऑफ सर्जरी ( ओब्सट्रेटिक्स
एंड गायनोकोलोजी )
डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन/मास्टर एमडी/ एमएस ( ऑप्थलमोलोजी ) ऑफ सर्जरी ( ऑप्थलमोलोजी )
एमएस ( ईएनटी ) मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ईएनटी )
मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( जनरल सर्जरी ) एमएस ( जनरल सर्जरी ) मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ओर्थोपेडिक्स ) एमएस ( ओर्थोपेडिक्स ) (मार्च , 2008 को या उसके बाद हिमालयन इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइंसिस , देहरादून में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध [ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
6196
MS ( General Surgery )
"Master of Surgery ( General Surgery ) "
MS ( Orthopaedics )
"Master of Surgery ( Orthopaedics ) "
में " एच आई एच टी विश्वविद्यालय , देहरादून " द्वारा प्रदान की गई चिकित्सा अर्हता मान्यताप्राप्त होगी । )
[सं.यू. 12012/4/2010 - एमई ( पी- II ) पीटी ]
अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव
(These shall be recognised medical qualification when granted by " HIHT University , Dehradun " in respect of students admitted at Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences , Dehradun on or after March , 2008 ) .
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare )
[No.U.12012 / 4 / 2010 - ME ( P.II ) pt . ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.
New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010
उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय ( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग ) भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 12 अगस्त, 2010 S.O. 2310.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2 ) of the section 11 of the Indiain Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) , the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change in name of affiliating University namely :-
का.आ. 2311.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 कं नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानकों का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) नए भारतीय स्थापित तिथि
मानक द्वारा
संख्या की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
In the said First Schedule before " H.N.B. Garhwal University , Uttaranchal " and entries thereto " HІНТ University, Dehradun " shall be added and against " HIHT University " under the heading ' Recognised Medical Qualification' [ hereinafter referred to as column ( 2 ) ] , and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' ( hereinafter referred to as column ( 3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted , namely :-
अतिक्रमित
D.A.
"Diploma in Anaesthesia "
भारतीय मानक
D.C.H.
"Diploma in Child Health "
अथवा मानकों,
D.C.P.
"Diploma in Clinical Pathology "
यदिकोई हो ,
D.G.O.
की संख्या और वर्ष "Diploma in Obstetrics & Gynaecology "
D. Ortho.
"Diploma in Orthopaedics "
(3)
(4)
(2)
(1)
D.M.R.D.
"Diploma in Medical Radio Diagnosis "
31 जनवरी ,
1. आई एस 12762 ( भाग 1 ):
MD
"Doctor of Medicine ( Anaesthesiology ) "
2010
(Anaesthe-
siology)
MD( Biochemistry)
"Doctor of Medicine ( Biochemistry ) "
2010/आईसी 60904 ; 1 : 2006 प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्तियाँ भाग 1 प्रकाशवोल्टीय करंट का मापन- ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण )
MD ( General Medicine )
"Doctor of Medicine
31 जनवरी , (General Medicine ) "
2010 MD (Microbiology )
"Doctor of Medicine ( Microbiology) "
MD ( Paediatrics )
"Doctor of Medicine ( Paediatrics ) "
MD( Pathology )
"Doctor of Medicine ( Pathology) "
MD( Pharmacology )
"Doctor of Medicine ( Pharmacology ) "
MD( Physiology )
"Doctor of Medicine ( Physiology ) "
2. आई एस 12762 ( भाग 5 ) : 2010/आईसी 60904 ; 5 : 1993 प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्तियाँ भाग 5 खुले परिपथ वोल्टेज पद्धति द्वारा प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्तियों का तुल्य तापमान ज्ञात करना
MD( Radio-
31जनवरी , diagnosis / Radiology)
"Doctor of Medicine ( Radio- diagnosis/ Radiology ) "
2010
MD ( S.P.M./
Community Medicine)
"Doctor of Medicine ( Socieal & Preventive Medicine/ Community Medicine ) "
MD /MS ( Anatomy )
"Doctor of Medicine / Master of Surgery( Anatomy ) "
3. आई एस 12762 ( भाग 1 ) : 2010/ आईसी 60904 ; 8 : 1998 प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्तियाँ भाग 8 प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्ति की वर्णक्रमीय प्रतिक्रिया (रेस्पोंस) का मापना
MD /MS ( OBG )
31 जनवरी,
4. आई एस 12762 ( भाग 9 ) :
2010 "Doctor of Medicine /Master of Surgery ( Obstetrics & Gynaecology) "
MD /MS ( Ophthalmology )
"Doctor of Medicine / Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology ) "
2010/आईसी 60904 ; 9 :2007 प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्तियाँ भाग 9 सोलर सिमुलेटर की की कार्यकारी अपेक्षाएं
MS ( ENT)
Master of Surgery ( ENT) " [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6197 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
( 1) (2)
(1)
(3)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(4)
31 जनवरी ,
2010
5. आई एस 12762 ( भाग 10 ) : 2010/आईसी 60904 : 10 : 1998 प्रकाशवोल्टीय युक्तियाँ भाग 10 रैखिकीय मापन की पद्धतियां
Photovoltaic Devices Part I , Measurement ofPhotovoltaic Current Voltage Characteristics ( First Revision)
31जनवरी ,
2010
2. IS 12762 ( Part 5) 2010/ IEC 60904-5 : 1993 31 January, 2010 6. आई एस 14286 : 2010/ आईसी 61215 :2005 क्रस्टलीन सिलिकॉन भौमिक प्रकाशवोल्टीय मॉडयूल- डिज़ाइन अर्हता एवं टाइप स्वीकृति ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण )
Photovoltaic Devices Part 5 , Determination of the Equivalent Cell Temperature (Ect. ) of Photovoltaic (PV) Devices by the Open- Circuit Voltage Method
7. आई एस/ आईसी 61725 : 1987 दैनिक सौर प्रोफाइल की विश्लेषणात्मक अभिव्यक्ति 31 जनवरी , 2010
31 January ,
2010
3. IS 12762 ( Part 8 ) 2010/ IEC 60904 : 8 : 1998 Photovoltaic Devices Part 8 , Measurement of Spectral Response of a Photovoltaic ( PV ) Device
इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानकः भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बटूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
31 January, 2010 [ संदर्भ : ईटी 28 /टी -8 , टी -21 , टी-23 , टी-24 , टी -25 , टी -19 , टी-34]
4. IS 12762 ( Part 9) 2010/ IEC 6090 4-9 :2007 Photovoltaic Devices Part9 , Solar Simulator Performance Requirements
31 January , आर. के. त्रेहान, वैज्ञा- ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी ) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
2010 (Department of Consumer Affairs ) Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi , the 12th August , 2010
5. IS 12762 ( Part 10 ) 2010/ IEC 60904 : 10 : 1998 Photovoltaic Devices Part 10 , Methods of Linearity Measurement
6. IS 14286 : 2010 / IEC 61215 : 2005 Crystal Line 31 January, 2010 S.O. 2311.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
No. and
Sl . No. and Year of the
Date of
No. Indian Standards
Year of the Establish-
Silicon Terrestrial Photovoltaic ( PV) ModulesDesign Qualification and Type Approval (FirstRevision)
Indian Stan-
ed
dards , if any ,
Superseded
7. IS /IEC 61725: 1997 Analytical Expression for Daily Solar Profiles 31 January , 2010 by the New
Indian
Standard
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
31 January ,
1. IS 12762 ( Part 1 ) 2010/ IEC 60904-1 : 2006
2010
Copiesof these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , [PART !! -SFC . 3( 0) 6198
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18, 2010/BHADRA 27, 1932
Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
[Ref.: ET 28 / T - 8 , T-21 , T-23 , T -24, T-25, T- 19, T-34] R. K. TREHAN, Sc . E and Head (Electro-technical)
Sl. No. and Year of the No. Indian Standards
नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2010
No. and Date Year of the Establish- Indian Stan- dards, ifany, Superseded bythe New Indian Standard ed का.आ. 2312.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानकों का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-
(3)
(2)
(1)
अनुसूची
क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) संख्या की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक
IS/IEC 60079-0: 2004
1. IS/IEC 60079-0: 2007 Electrical Apparatus forExplosive Atmos- pheres General Requirements
IS/IEC 60079-1 2011 2007 नए भारतीय स्थापित तिथि मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हो, कीसंख्या और वर्ष
2. IS/IEC 60079-1: 2007 Electrical Apparatus for ExplosiveGas Atmospheres Flamepro ofEnclosures " d "
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
जनवरी ,
ES/IEC 60079-7: 1January, 2011 2007 आईएस/ 1 आईईसी60079- 2011 0: 2004
1. आई एस/ आईईसी 60079-0: 2004 विस्फोटी पर्यावरण- सामान्य अपेक्षाएं
3. IS/IEC 60079-7: 2006 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmos- pheres Increased Safety " e"
आईएस/ 1 जनवरी , आईईसी 60079- 2011 1: 2007
2. आई एस/ आईईसी 60079-1: 2007 विस्फोटी पर्यावरण- ज्वालासह आवरण " d"
IS/IEC I Januar 60079-11: 201 2006 आईएस/ 1 जनवरी , आईईसी 60079- 2011 7: 2007
4 IS/IEC 60079-11 : 2006Electrical Apparatus For Explosive Gas Armos- pheres Intrinsic Safety "i "
3. आई एस/आईईसी 60079-7: 2007 विस्फोटी पर्यावरण- भाग 7 बढ़ी सुरक्षा " e"
1 जनवरी ,
आईएस/
2011
आईईसी 60079-
11 : 2006
4. आई एस/आईईसी 60079-11: 2006 विस्फोटी पर्यावरण- भाग ।। आंतरिक सुरक्षा " i "
Copies of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal. Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram
[Ref.: ET 22 / Γ -31 , Г-45 , Т -61 , Т - 62 ] R. K. TREHAN , Sc . E and Head ( Electro - technical ) इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों; नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बटूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त, 2010 [ संदर्भ: ईटी 22 /टी -31 . , टी-45 , टी-61 , टी-62 ] आर. के. त्रेहान , वैज्ञा- ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी) New Delhi, the 19th August , 2010
का.आ. 2313.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक(कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गये हैं:-
S.O. 2312. - In pursuance of clause (b) of Sub -rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ) )
अनुसूची
संशोधन लागू होने की क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) संख्या की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक
संशोधन की संख्या और
तिथि
तिथि ( 1) (2)
(3)
(4)
संशोधन संख्या 31 अगस्त, 1 अगस्त, 2010 2010
1. आईएस 12381 : 1994- प्रत्यक्ष अपचयन प्रकम ले लिए कोयले ( आदग्ध) की प्रतिक्रिया ज्ञात करने की पद्धति ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )
इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिसनी, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई , गुबई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अभदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बटूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
[संदर्भ : एमटीडी 30/टी -11 ] पी घोष , वैज्ञानित ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी ) New Delhi , the 23rd August, 2010
3.0 23. pursuancuoise (b ) of sub -rule of Rule of the Barem canards " nies , 1987, the Buru fin fa . Staubsurtifies that the amenet unt to fadian Standard purulars of which are given to the Sunedute have sancted have been established on the date indicated against each: --
No. and Date from S.No. and Title C
Year ofthe
No. Standard ( s )
amendment
which the amend- ment shall have
effect
(3)
(1) (2)
(4) 1. IS 12381 : 1994- Coal
Amendment No. 31 August 1 August 2010 2010 (Char) reactivity for direct reduction process Method of determination (First revision)
Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref.: MTD 30/T - 11 ] P. GHOSH, Sc . ' F ' and Head ( Met Eng .)
6199
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2314.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
संशोधन लागू होने की क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) संख्या की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
तिथि
( 3 )
( 1) ( 2 )
(4)
संशोधन संख्या 16 अगस्त, 1 जुलाई , 2010 2010 1. आईएस 1993 : 2006/ आईएसओ 11949 : 1995- अतप्त- लघुकृत विद्युत अपघटनी टिन प्लेट ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण )
संशोधन संख्या 31 अगस्त, अगस्त, 2010 2010 2. आईएस 12591 : 2006/ आईएसओ 11950 : 1995-1 अतप्त- लघुकृत विद्युत अपघटनी क्रोमियम/क्रोमियम आक्साइड सेोषत इम्माल
( पहला पुभरीक्षण )
इस संशोधन को प्रति भारतीय मानक माधवन बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 मेयल गई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , चुम्बई सारखा कार्यालयों- अहमदाबाद, बंगलोर , भाल , भुवनश्र, कोयार , गुनाडाली , पैवरायान , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा निश्वस्तापुग्म में विक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
संदर्भ: एमटीडी 4/ दी -8 , 1/91 पी. घोष, वैज्ञानिक ' एक' एवं प्रमुख एमटीडी New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2314.in pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-
SCHEDULE
Sl . No. and Title of the No. Standard ( s )
No. and Year of the amendment
Date from which the amend- ment shall have effect
(4)
(3 )
(1 ) (2)
1 .
Amendment 16 August , No. 1 2010 IS 1993 : 2006- ISO 11949 : 1995 Cold -reduced [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27, 1932
6200
SCHEDULE
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
July2010
Sl . No. and Title of the No. Indian Standards
electrolytic tinplate (fourthrevision)
No. and Year of the amendment 2. IS 12591 : 2006-ISO
No. 1 August , Amendment 31 August 2010
2010
Datefrom which the amend- ment shail have effect
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
11950: 1995 Cold-reduced Electrolytic Chromium/ Cromium oxide - coated steel
1. IS 5613 ( Part 2 / Sec . 2):
(Firstrevision)
3 August , 31 August 2010 2010 Copy of these amendments are availabie for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref.: MTD 4/T- 8 , 179 ]
1985 Code of practice for design , installation and maintenance of overhead power lines , Part 2 Lines above 11 kV and upto and including 220 kV, Sec 2 Installation and maintenance
(Firstrevision)
P. GHOSH, Sc. ' F ' and Head (Met Engg.) नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त , 2010
का. आ. 2315.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं :-
Copy ofthis amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram..
[Ref.: ET 37 /1-29 ] अनुसूची
R. K. TREHAN , Sc.'F ' and Head ( Electro-technical ) नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2010 क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) संख्या की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक
संशोधन लागू
होने की
तिथि
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
31अगस्त
3, अगस्त
का.आ. 2316.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे के अनुसूची में दिए गए मानकों में संशोधन किया गया है: -
2010
2010
अनुसूची
1. आईएस 5613 ( भाग 2/ अनुभाग 2 ) : 1985 की संशोधन संख्या 3
संशोधन की संशोधन लागू
होने की
क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक संख्या की संख्या और वर्ष
संख्याऔर तिथि तिथि
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
1. 1905 : 1987
31अगस्त, 2010
1 , अगस्त 2010
31 अगस्त, इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बटूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
2. 9954 : 1981
2010
1 , अगस्त 2010 [संदर्भ: ईटी 37/टी -29 ] आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत- तकनीकी )
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बटूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ : सीईडी/राजपत्र ] New Delhi , the 23rd August, 2010 S.O. 2315. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule (1) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued.
ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी ) 6201 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 27th August, 2010 New Delhi , the 25th August , 2010
S.O. 2317.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued .
S.O. 2316. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule (1) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued .
SCHEDULE
SCHEDULE
Sl . No. and year of the No. Indian Standards
Sl . No. and year of the No. Indian Standards
No. and Year of the Date from amendment which the amend- ment shall have effect
No. and Date from Year of the which the amendment amend- ment shall have effect
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
1. 1905 : 1987
1. 2556 (Part 15) : 2004
2010 31 August ,
1 August, 2010
1 August, 16 August, 2010 2010 2. 9954: 1981
2. 14846: 2000
1 August, 31 August, 2010 2010
2010
3 August, 16 August, 2010 Copies of the amendment are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh; Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvanantha uram.
[Ref.: CED /Gazette ]
Copies of the amendment are available for sale with theBureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Banadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta Chandigarh , Chennai . Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahatı , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.
Ref: CED/Gazette ] A. K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' and Head (Civil Engg.) नई दिल्ली, 27 अगस्त, 2010
A. K. SAINI , Sc . F ' and Head ( Civil Eng.) नई दिल्ली, 30 अगस्त, 20: 0 का.आ. 2317.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानकों में संशोधन किया गया है :-
अनुसूची
का.आ. 2318. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
संख्या की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक
होने की तिथि
संशोधन की संशोधन लागू संख्या और तिथि
नये भारतीय स्थापित तिथि मानक द्वारा
क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) संख्या की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
1. 2556 ( भाग 15 ) : 2004
16 अगस्त 2010
1 , अगस्त 2010
16 अगस्त
अतिकमत भारतीय मानक उनकां यदि कारभा 2. 14846 : 2000
2010
3, अगस्त 2010
वर्ष
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
31 मार्च,
आई. एस.
2010 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्या। याः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बटूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्धहैं।
1. आई. एस. 7365 : 2010 बाल्टी टाइप उर्जा क्षयकारको की द्रवचालित डिजाइन के मापदण्ड ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )
365085 बाल्टी टाइप उर्जा क्षयकारकों की द्रवचालित [संदर्भ : सीईडी/राजपत्र ] ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )
3,484 G = 110-8 6202
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II S30 ) ] (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
== नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त , 2010 डिजाइन के मापदण्ड ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)
का.आ. 2319.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नौने अनुमुझे में दिए गये मानक में संशोधन किया गया है :
अनुसूची
क्रप संशोधित भारतीय मानक संख्या की संख्या और वर्ष
संशोधन की संशोधन लाग संख्या और हाने की तिथि इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन ,, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भूवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
(1) (2)
(3) () 1. आई.एस. 204 ( भाग 1 ) : 1991 2 अगस्त, 2. आई.एस. 6315 : 1992 2010 1 अगस्त, 2010 2010 19 अगस्त 2010 3. आई.एस. 6318 : 1971 1 अगस्त, 2010 31 अगस्त, 2010 [संदर्भ : डब्ल्यूआर डी 9 /टी -6 ] जे. सी. अरोड़ा, वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख ( जल संसाधन वि. ) New Delhi , the 30th August, 2010 S.O. 2318.-In pursuance of clause (b) of Sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
इस संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय भानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयाः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई, मुइ तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भल्नेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्ताप्रम में वक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
(संदर्भ: सीईडी १ ] Sl . No , Tit'e and Year of the No. and No. Indian Standards Established Date of Year of the Establish- Indian Stan- ment dards, ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1. IS 7365 : 2010 Criteria
for Hydraulic Design
ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक' एफ ' एवं पमुख ( सिविल इंजीनिय New Delhi , the 31st August , 2010 S.O. 2310 .--In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules . 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued.
ofBucketType
SCHEDULE
Energy Dissipators
(Second Revision)
IS7365: 1985 Criteria forHydraulic Design of Bucket Type Energy Dissipators (First Revision) 31-3-2010
Sl . No. year and Title of the No. Indian Standards No ond Date hom Year of C ... which the amendment shall have amd ment effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1. IS 204 (Part 1) : 1991 2 August , 16 August ,
2010
2010
2. IS 6315 : 1992
| August, 19 August , Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad: Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
Ref.:WRD 9/ T- 6 ] J. C. ARORA, Sc . Fand Head (WRD B. )
3. IS 6318 : 1971 2010 2010 1 August , 16 August , 2010 2010 Copy ofthe amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9. Bahadur [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
[ Ref.: CED /Gazette] A. K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' and Head ( Civil Engg.) नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2320.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम , 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरणीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के दिवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो हैं .
अनुसूची
क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) संख्या की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय स्थापित तिथि मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हो , की संख्या और
वर्ष
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
31जनवरी ,
2010 1. आई एस 15877 : 2010 कॉयर फेस ब्लॉक बोर्ड- विशिष्टि
31 जनवरी ,
2010 2. आई एस 15878 : 2010 सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए कॉयर हाईबोर्ड -विशिष्टि
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भूवनेश्वर , कोयम्बटूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र ] ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी ) New Delhi , the 31st August , 2010
S.O. 2320.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of Sub - rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
6203
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
SCHEDULE
No. and Year of the
Sl .
No. Indian Standards Established
Date of Establi- shed
No. and Year of the Indian Stan- dards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(4) (1) (2)
(3)
31 January , 2010 1. IS 15877 : 2010 Coir Faced Block Boards- Specification
31 January , 2010 2. IS 15878 : 2010 Coir Hardboard for General purposes-- Specification
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.
Ref.: CED/Gazette ] A. K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' and Head ( Civil Engg . ) नई दिल्ली , 3 सितम्बर , 2010
का.आ. 2321.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
संशोधन संख्या की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
लागूहोने की तिथि ( 1) ( 2)
(3)
(4)
संशोधन नं 4 , 18 अगस्त
2010
अगस्त, 2010
1. आई एस 1391 ( भाग 1 ) 1992 कक्ष वातानुकूलक- विशिष्ट भाग । एकिक वातानुकूलक ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
संशोधन नं 3 , 6 अगस्त 2010
जुलाई , 2010
2. आई एस 1391 ( भाग 2 ) 1992 कक्ष वातानुकूलक विशिष्ट भाग 2 विभक्त वातानुकूलक (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
सितम्बर
संशोधन नं 3 , 1
2010
जुलाई , 2010
3. आई एस 2980 : 1999 विना दाब स्टोव विशिष्ट (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 6204
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
(4) (2)
(3)
(1)
संशोधन नं 4 , 1 सितम्बर जुलाई , 2010 2010 4. आई एस 8808 : 1999 तेल दाब स्टोव और तेल दाब हीटर के लिए बर्नर - विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
संशोधन नं 2 , 31 जुलाई
2010
जुलाई , 2010
5. आई एम 13258 : 1991 अल्प दाब द्रवणीय गैसों के लिए 5 लीटर से अधिक जल क्षमता वाले वैल्डिगत अल्प कार्बन इस्पात के सिलिंडर - उपयोग किए गए एलपीजी सिलिंडरों के पुर्ननवीयन और निरीक्षण की रीति संहिंता
संशोधन नं 3 , 18 अगस्त जुलाई , 2010 2010 6. आई एस 15490: 2004 वाहनों के लिए ईंधन के रूप में संपीडित प्राकृतिक गैस के ऑन बोर्ड भंडारण के लिए सिलेंडर- विशिष्टि
7. आई एस 15660 : 2006 भरप्प योग्य परिवहनी योग्य जोड़ रहित एल्यूमिनियम संशोधन नं 2 , 31 जुलाई जुलाई , 2010 मिश्र धातु के गैस सिलेंडर - विशिष्टि 2010 इस संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भूवनेश्वर , कोयम्बटूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भ : एम. ई. डी. /जी -2 : 1 ] सी. के. वेदा , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( इंजीनियरिंग ) New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2010 S.O. 2321. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
(3)
(2)
(1)
Unitary air con- ditioners ( Second Revision)
Amendment No. 3 July , 6 August 2010 2010
2. IS 1391 ( Pt . 2) : 1992 Room air conditioner specification Part 2 , Splitair conditioners (Second Revision )
Amendment | September 2010 No. 3 July , 2010
3. IS 2980 : 1999 Non -pressure stoves- specification (Third Revision )
Amendment 1 September 2010 No 4 July .
4. IS 8808 : 1999 Burners for oil pressure stoves and oil pressure 2010 heaters- Specification (Second Revision )
Amendment No. 2 July , 2010 31 July 2010 5. IS 13258 : 1991 Welded low carbon steel cylinders exceeding 5liter water capacity for low pressure liquefiable gases- Code ofpractice for inspection and reconditioning of used LPG cylinders.
Amendment 18 August 2010
No. 3 July , 2010
6. IS 15490: 2004 Cylinders for on - board storage of compressed Natural gas as a fuel for Automotive vehicles Specification
Amendment No. 2 July, 2010 31 July 2010 7. IS 15660: 2006 Refillable transportable seamless aluminium alloy gas cylinders Specification
Date from
Sl . No. and Year of the No. Indian Standards
No. and Year of the amend- ment which the amendment shall have effect
(4)
(3)
(1 ) (2)
2010
Amendment 18 August No. 4 August , 2010
1. IS 1391 ( Pt . 1 ) : 1992 Room air conditioner specification Part 1 ,
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad ; Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .
[ Ref.: MED/G- 2 : 1 ] C. K. VEDA, Secientist Fand Head ( Engg .) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
6205
नई दिल्ली , 3 सितम्बर , 2010
का.आ. 2322.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम लाइसेंस सं. संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
(3)
(4)
(1) ( 2)
1. 3627362 4-5-2010 गोल्डन इंटरप्राइजेज प्लॉट नं. सी/22/4/ 1 ए/पी एमआयडीसी शिरोली तालुका हटकंगले जिला कोल्हापुर-416122 महाराष्ट्र ।
2 3616963 11-5-2010 रेणुका एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज स.नं. 301/3 , बोरुडे कास्टी एट पोस्ट पाथारडी तालुका पाथारडी जिला अहमदनगर -414102 महाराष्ट्र ।
3 3616458 11-5-2010 शामल इंडस्ट्रीज प्लॉट नं . ए 9/18 , विजय सीड्स कंपनी के पास अति. एमआयडीसी जिला जालना-431203 महाराष्ट्र ।
4 3629063 12-5-2010 वन फूड्स प्लॉट नं . 31 , गट संख्या 411 गांव उरावदे तालुका मुलशी जिला पुणे -412108 महाराष्ट्र ।
5 7993310 27-4-2010 शिवगंगा बेवरेजेज गट संख्या 438 बाय पास रोड तालुका भोकर जिला नांदेड़ -431801 महाराष्ट्र । 6 3632860 25-5-2010 अकुआलाइट इंडस्ट्रीज स.नं. 43/2 , दत्तनगर अरोहा मंगल कार्यालय के पास आम्बेगांव , कात्रज , तालुका हवेली जिला पुणे -411046 महाराष्ट्र ।
भारतीय मालक का शीर्षक
अनु- वर्ष भाग
भामा भाग संख्या
(5)
(6) ( 7) ( 8 ) ( 9 )
2000
4985
पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए अप्लास्टिक पीवीसी पाइप्स ।
2004
14543
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
2004
14543
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
14543
2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
14543
2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
2004
14543
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
[सं. सी एम डी 13:11 ]
सी.के. महेश्वरी , वैज्ञानिक- जी ( प्रमाणन) [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)| THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
6206
New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2010
S. O. 2322. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certifica- tion) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Part
Year
Sec .
IS No.
Title of the Standard
Grant Date
Licence No.
Name and Address of the Party
Sl. No.
(8 ) ( 9 )
(6) (7)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
( 1 )
2000
4985
4-5-2010
1. 3627362
Unplasticized PVC pipes for potable water supplies
GoldenEnterprises PlotNo. C/ 22 / 4 / 1 A/ P MIDC Shiroli Taluka Hatkanangale District Kolhapur- 416122 Maharashtra .
2011
14543 11-5-2010
2. 3616963
Renuka Agro Industries S. No. 301/3 , Borude Casti
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )
AtPost Pathardi Taluka Pathardi District Ahmednagar - 414102 Maharashtra .
2001
14543 11-5-2010
3. 3616458
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )
Shamal Industries Plot No. A9 / 18 Near Vijay Seeds Company Addl . MIDC District Jalna - 431203 Maharashtra .
2004
14543 4. 3629063 12-5-2010
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )
One Foods PlotNo. 31 , Gat No. 411 Village Urawade Taluka Mulshi District Pune-412108 Maharashtra .
2004
14543 27-4-2010
5. 7993310
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )
Shivganga Beverages GatNo. 438 By Pass Road Taluka Bhokar District Nanded - 431801 Maharashtra .
2004
14543 25-5-2010
6. 3632860
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )
Aqualite Industries S. No. 43/2 , Dattanagar Near Aroha Mangal Karyalaya Ambegaon , Katraj Taluka Haveli District Pune - 411046 Maharashtra .
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
C. K. MAHESHWARI , Scientist - G ( Certification ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
6207
कोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 13 सितम्बर , 2010
का. आ. 2323.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 2935 तारीख 19 अक्तूबर , 2009 , जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 24 अक्तूबर , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट ऐसी भूमि और उस पर के सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और मध्य प्रदेश सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 81.016 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 200.19 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाने चाहिए;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 9 की उप धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथा वर्षिर्णत 81.016 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 200.19 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाते हैं;
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/ जीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/ 378 तारीख 23 मार्च 2010 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , उमरिया ( मध्यप्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
अनुसूची
विन्धया डेपिलरिंग ब्लाक , जोहिला क्षेत्र
जिला- उमरिया ( मध्य प्रदेश )
( संख्या एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/ 378 , तारीख 23 मार्च , 2010 )
सभी अधिकार :
क्रम ग्राम का नाम
साधारण नम्बर तहसील
जिला क्षेत्र हेक्टंगर में
टिप्पणियां सं.
पटवारी हल्का नम्बर
1 . डगडउवा
102
290
उमरिया
बान्धवगढ़
81.016
भाग
कुल : 81.016 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 200.19 एकड़ ( लगभग )
1 . ग्राम डगडउवा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :
212 ( भाग ) , 192 ( भाग ) 193 ( भाग ) , 194 ( भाग ) , 195 से 202 , 203 ( भाग ) , 204 ( भाग ) , 205 से 209 , 210 ( भाग ) , 211 , 213 ( भाग ) 216 ( भाग ) , 254( भाग ) , 257( भाग ) , 258 ( भाग ) , 259 से 265 , 266 ( भाग ) , 267 से 269 , 270 ( भाग ) , 271 ( भाग ) , 273( भाग ) ।
सीमा वर्णन :
क- ख- ग रेखा, लहंगी नाले के पूर्वी किनारे पर बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्यांक 273 , बिन्दु ' ख ' , 270 , 271 से होते हुए जाती है और बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।
ग - घ -ङ रेखा , ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्यांक 271 , 257 , 258 फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 259 की उत्तरी सीमा , प्लाट संख्यांक 254 , बिन्दु ' घ ' से होते हुए जाती है और प्लाट संख्यांक 210 की पश्चिमी सीमा पर बिन्दु " ड " पर मिलती है । [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
6208
ङ- च - छ रेखा, ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्यांक 210 , 213 , 212 , 216 , बिन्दु ' च' और 204 से होते हुए जाती है और बिन्दु " छ " पर मिलती है ।
छ-ज- झ-ञ रेखा , ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्यांक 203 , बिन्दु ' ज ' , बिन्दु ' झ ' से होकर फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 203 की पूर्वी सीमा से होते हुए जाती है और बिन्दु " ञ " पर मिलती है ।
ज- ट- रेखा , ग्राम उगडउवा के प्लाट संख्यांक 203 , बिन्दु ' ट ' से होते हुए प्लाट संख्यांक 195 के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा के साथ प्लाट संख्यांक 192 , 194 से होकर जाती है फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 193 की पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " उ " पर मिलती है ।
ठ-ड - ढ- ण रेखा, ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्यांक 193 , 194 से होते हुए फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 194 , 198 , 199 , 266 की दक्षिणी सीमा , बिन्दु ' ड ' प्लाट संख्यांक 266 , बिन्दु ' ढ ' और बिन्दु 273 से होकर जाती है और बिन्दु " ण " पर मिलती है :
ण-क रेखा, ग्राम उगडउवा में लहंगी नाला के पूर्वी किनारे से होती हुई जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।
[फा. सं . 43015 / 22/ 2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 13th September , 2010
S. O. 2323. Whereas , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 2935 dated the 19th October , 2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , Part - 11 , Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated the 24th October , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire 81.016 hectares or 200.19 Acres land as all rights in or over such lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;
And whereas , the competent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act has made his report to the Central Government;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after consuring the Government of Madhya Pradesh , is satisfied that the lands measuring 81.016 hectares ( approximately ) or 200.19 acres ( approximately ) as all rights in or over such lands as described in schedule appended hereto , should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of section 9 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 81.016 hectares (approximately ) or 200.19 acres ( approximately ) as all rights in or over such lands as described in Schedule are hereby acquired .
The Plan bearing number SECL/ BSP /GM ( PLG ) / LAND/ 378 dated the 23rd March , 2010 of the area.coveredby this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Collector , Umaria ( Madhya Pradesh ) or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata- 700001 or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfield Limited ( Revenue Section) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur - 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ) .
SCHEDULE
Vindhya Depiller ing Block, Johilla Area District- Umaria ( Madhya Pradesh ) (Plannumber : SECL/ BSP / GM ( PLC ) / LAND / 378 dated the 23rd March , 2010 )
All Rights :
Remarks
District
Tahsil
Name of
SI .
Area in hectares
General number
No. village
Patwari halka number
81.016
Part
290
Bandhogarh Umaria
102
1 . Dagdauwa
Total : -81.016 hectares ( approximately ) or 200.19 acres ( approximately) 1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Dagdauwa (Part ) :
192( P ) , 193 ( P) 、 194 ( P ) , 195 to 202 , 203 ( P ) , 204 ( P ), 205 to 209 , 210 ( P ) , 211 , 212 ( P ) , 213 ( P ) , 216 ( P ) , 254 ( P ) , 257 ( P ), 258 ( P ) , 259 to 265 , 266 ( P ) , 267 to 269 , 270 ( P ) , 271 ( P ) , 273 ( P).
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
6209 Boundary Description :
A -B -C Line starts from point ' A ' on the eastern bank of Lahangi Nullah and passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 273 , point ' B ' , 270 , 271 and meets at point ' C' .
C-D- E Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 271 , 257 , 258 , northern boundary of plot number 259, through plot number 254 , point ' D ' and meets at point ' E ' on the western boundary of plot number 210 .
E-F-G Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 210,213,212,216 , point ' F ' , 204 and meets at point ' G ' .
G-H- I -J Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 203 , point ' H ' , point ' I ' , then along eastern boundary of plotnumber 203 and meets at point ' J ' .
J-K-L Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 203 , point ' K ' , then along partly eastern boundary of plot number 195 , through plot number 192 , 194 , along eastern boundary of plot number 193 and meets at point' L' .
L -M -N -O Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 193 , 194 then along southern boundary of plot number 194, 198 , 199, 266 , point ' M ' , through plot number 266 , point ' N ' , 273 and meets at point ' O' .
O-A Line passes in village Dagdauwa along eastern bank of Lahangi Nullah and meets at starting point 'A' .
[ F. No. 43015 /22 /2008 - PR ( W - 1 ) ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 13 सितम्बर , 2010
का. आ. 2324.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 की धारा 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार ने कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1083 , तारीख 17 अप्रैल , 2009 , जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उप-खण्ड ( ii ) , तारीख 25 अप्रैल, 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 454.63 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1123.39 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त करना है ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , अनुसूची में वर्णित 431.27 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1065.66 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या सी -1 ( ई ) 3 /जेजेएमआर/825-0410 , तारीख 19 अप्रैल , 2010 का निरीक्षण कलकटर , चन्द्रपुर , महाराष्ट्र के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता ( पिन -700 001 ) के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक ( भूमि और राजस्व ) , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स , नागपुर -440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
टिप्पण 2 : उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है : - अर्जन की बाबत आपत्तियां :
" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है, अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।
स्पष्टीकरण: -
( 1 ) इस धारा के अर्थान्त यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी , कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।
34849 /10-9 [PART 11 SEC. 3 ( 1 )] 6210
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
..
(2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी आपत्तिकर्ता का स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिश्वित जाच , यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या जम पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिप केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चिय के लिए देगा ।
(3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, यह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का स होता. गदि भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में था उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते । " टिप्पण 3 : कंन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक, । , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700 001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा के अधीীদ अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 2519. नारीख 27 मई, 1983 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र , भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख ।। जून, 1983 द्वारा प्रकाशित को सक्षम प्राधिकार द्वारा नियुक्त किया जाता है ।
अनुसूची
न्यू माजरी अंडरग्राउन्ड से ओपनकास्ट ब्लॉक
माजरी क्षेत्र
जिला चन्द्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र)
रेखांक संख्या: सी ( ई ) 825-0410 तारीख 19 अप्रैल , 2010]
सभी अधिकार:
टिप्या
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में
thit
जिला
तहसील
पटवारी संख्या
7.
6.
5.
3.
भाग
40.64
चन्द्रपुर
2.
'भाग
62.06
चन्द्रपुर
भाग
109.27
भद्रावती
こ
चन्द्रपुर
3.
भाग
219.30
3
चन्द्रपुर
भद्रावती
4
कुल : 431.27 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1065.66 एकड़ ( लगभग )
ग्राम पनसगांव में गंजत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक :
235, 236, 237 238 239, 240 , 241 , 2442/1 , 242/2 , 243/1 , 243/2 , 243/3 , 243/4 , 244/1 , 244/2 , 244/3 , 245 , 2106-1 बऔर 246 एक. 246-25 , 246-18, 246/3 , 246/4 , 24771,247 / 2,247 / 3,247 / 4 , 247/5 , 247/6 , 247/7 , 247/8 , 248 , 249 ग्राम शिवतीनगर में अर्जित कि जाने वाले प्लाट संख् यांक :
10. 11 /1 क , 11/2 , 11/3 , 12, 13/1 , 137.2 , 14 ( वन ) , 15/1 , 15/2 , 17, 18 , 19 ( वन ) , 20 ( वन ) , 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25 , 26, 27 , 28 , 291 , 242 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 67 , 69 ( सरकारी ) , 70 , 71 , 74 , नाला ग्राम नामलीन में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:
44/4 , 45, 46 , 47, 48, 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61/1 , 61/2 , 61/3 , 61/4 , 62 , 63 , 64,65 , 66 , 67 ( सरकारी , 68, 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73/1 , 73/2 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78/1 , 78/2 , 79, 82/1 , 82/2 , 84/1 , 84/2 , 86 , 87/1 , 87/2 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92,93 , 95, 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100/क, 100/ख , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 ( सरकारी ) , 106 , 107/1 , 107/2 , 107/3 , सड़क 3211 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
ग्राम पटाला में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक :
243/1 , 243/2 , 245 ,246 , 247/1 , 247/2 , 247/3 , 248 , 249,250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255,256 , 257 , 258 , 259/1,272,273,274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278/1 , 278/2 , 279/1 , 279/2 , 279/3 , 279/4 , 279/5 , 230 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 288 / 1,288 / 2,280,25 291 , 292 , 293/1 , 293/2 , 293/3 , 294 , 295 , 296/1 , 296/ 2 क , 296/2ख , 297 , 300/2 , 301/1 , 301 / 2 क , 30128 , 302, 303 , 308.5 . 304/2 , 304/3 , 304/4 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312/1 , 312/2 , 312/3 , 313/1 , 313/2 , 314 , 315 , 316, 317 , 348 . 318/2,318/3,318 / 4 , 319,320 , 321 , 322 , 323/1 , 323/2 , 323/3 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329/1 , 329/2 , 329/3 , 329/4,330, 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336/1 , 336/2 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 357 , 360 , 361 , 362/1 , 362/2 , 363 , 364/1 , 364/ 2,364/3,364/4,36% , 366 , 369 , 371 , 372/1 , 372/2 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 389 , 390 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 442 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 , 447 , 448 , 449 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , सड़क , नाला
सीमा वर्णन :
क-ख रेखा ग्राम पटाला में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और प्लाट संख्यांक 446 , 447 , 449 , 448 , 443 , 456 , 457 की बाहः सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 375 , 372/2 , 372/1 , 371 , 369 , 273 , 272, 259/1 , 258 , 243-2 . 243/1 , 245 , 246 , 247/1 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर नाला और ग्राम पटाला तथा ग्राम नागलोन की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है और ग्राम नागलोन से प्लाट संख्यांक 106 , 107/1 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।
ख-ग रेखा ग्राम नागलोन से प्लाट संख्यांक 107/1 , 102 , 101 , 100/क , 100 /ख की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर सड़क पार करती है और प्लाट संख्यांक 45 , 44/1 , की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और ग्राम नागलोन तथा ग्राम पलसगांव की सम्मिलित ग्रामसीमा को पार करती है फिर ग्राम पलसगांव से प्लाट संख्यांक 247/8 , 247/7 , 248 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।
ग -घ रेखा ग्राम पलसगांव से प्लाट संख्यांक 248 , 249 , 247/1 , 246/ 2 क , 245 , 235 , 236 , 237 की बाह्य सौमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर ग्राम पलसगांव और ग्राम नागलोन की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है फिर ग्राम नागलोन से प्लाट संख्यांक 61/462 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर ग्राम नागलोन और ग्राम शिवजीनगर की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है और ग्राम शिवजीनगर से प्लाट संख्यांक 45 ,44 , 43 , 42 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर नाला पार करती है और प्लाट संख्यांक 28 , 29/1 , 29/2. 19 ( वन ) , 18 , 17 , 71 , 34 , 20 ( वन ) , 15/1 , 15/2 , 13/1 , 13/2 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर ग्राम पटाला के प्लाट संख्यांक 323/1 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर ग्राम शिवजीनगर से प्लाट संख्यांक 12 , 10 , 74 , 11/2 , 11 / 1 क , की बाह) सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर ग्राम शिवजीनगर और ग्राम पटाला की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है फिर ग्राम पटाला से प्लाट संख्यांक 333 , 338 , 339 , की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।
घ-क रेखा ग्राम पटाला से प्लाट संख्यांक 339 , 337 , 336/2 , 336/1 , 329/3 , 357 , 329/1 , 360 , 390 , 389 , 366 , 293/2 , 293/1 , 369 , 371 , 372/1 , 372/2 , 373 , 374 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 427 , 428 , 429 , की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर पुनः सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लाट संख्यांक 456 , 455 , 454 , 447 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/9 /2009- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th September , 2010
S.O. 2324.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S. O. 1083 dated the 17th April , 2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , Part II , Section - 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated the 25th April , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 454.63 hectares ( approximately ) or 1123.39 acres ( approximately ) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;
And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of said lands prescribed in the schedule ( s ) appended to this notification ;
6212
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
==
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire all rights in or over the land measuring 431.27 hectares (approximately) or 1065.66 acres (approximately ) described in Schedule .
Note 1 : The plan bearing number C- 1 ( E) III/ JJMR/ 825-0410 , dated the 19th April , 2010 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Chandrapur ( Maharashtra ) or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata ( Pin - 700001 ) or in the office of the General Manager (Land and Revenue ) , Western Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Department ) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440001 (Maharashtra).
Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows: - Objections to Acquisition:
"8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under Section 7 has been issued , may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land .
Explanation : -
( 1) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desiresto undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that sur operations should not be undertake by the Central Government or by any other person .
(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority pang , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in porsat or by legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respect ofthe land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government .
(3) For the purpose of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act . " Note 3 : The Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata- 700 001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 2519 dated the 27th May, 1983 , published in Part- II , Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India , dated the 11th June , 1983.
SCHEDULE
New Majri UG To OC Block
Majri Area
District Chandrapur ( Maharashtra)
¡Plan number : C- 1 ( E ) III/JJ / MR/ 825-0410 , dated the 19th April , 2010]
AllRights:
SI Nameofvillage
No.
Patwari Circle number 1.
2.
3. 1.
2 Palasgaon
Tahsil
District
Area in hectares
Remarks 4.
5.
6.
7. Bhadrawati
40.64
Chandrapur
2.
4 Shivjinagar
Part Bhadrawati
62.06
Chandrapur
3.
2 Naglone
Part Bhadrawati
109.27
Chandrapur
4. Patala
3
Part Bhadrawati
219.30
Chandrapur
Part Total: 431.27 hectares ( approximately) or 1065.66 acres ( approximately) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6213 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
Plot number to be acquired in village Palasgaon :
235, 236 , 237, 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242/ 1,242/2 , 243/1 , 243/2 , 243/3 , 243/4 , 244/ 1,244/2 , 244/3 , 245 , 246/1 & 246/2A, 246/2A , 246/2B , 246/3 , 246/4 , 247/1 , 247/2 , 247/3,247/4,247/5,247/6 , 247/7 , 247/8 , 248 , 249 .
Plot number to be acquired in village Shivajinagar :
10 , 11 / 1A , 11/2 , 11/3 , 12 , 13/1 , 13/2 , 14 ( Forest ) , 15/1 , 15/2 , 17 , 18 , 19 ( Forest ) , 20 ( Forest) , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24, 25, 26 , 27 , 28, 29/ 1,29/2 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36, 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45, 67, 69 (Govt . ) , 70, 71 , 74, Nallah .
Plot number to be acquired in village Naglone :
44/1 , 45 ,46, 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54, 55 , 56, 57, 58 , 59 , 60 , 61/1 , 61/2 , 61/3 , 61/4 , 62 , 63 , 64,65 , 66, 67 (Govt . ) , 68 , 69, 70 , 71 , 72 , 73/1 , 73/2 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 / 1,78 /2 , 79 , 82/1 , 82/2 , 84/1 , 84/2 , 86 , 87/1 , 87/2 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97 , 98, 99 , 100/A , 100/B , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 ( Govt .) , 106 , 107/1 , 107/2 , 107/3 , Road.
Plotnumber to be acquired in village Patala :
243/1,243/2,245,246 , 247/ 1,247/2 , 247/3 , 248 , 249,250,251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 / 1,272,273,274,275,276 , 277 , 278/ 1,278/2,279 / 1,279 / 2,279 / 3 , 279/4 , 279/5 , 280 , 281 , 282, 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 288 / 1,288 /2 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293/1 , 293/2 , 293/3, 294, 295 , 296/1 , 296 /2A, 296 /2B , 297 , 300/2 , 301/1 , 301 / 2A, 301/28 , 302 , 303 , 304 ,/ 1 , 304/2 , 304/3 , 304/4 , 305 , 306, 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312/1 , 312/2 , 312/3 , 313/1 , 313/2 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318/1 , 318/2 , 318/3 , 318/4 , 319,320 , 321 , 322, 323/1 , 323/2, 323/3 , 324 , 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329/1 , 329/2 , 329/3 , 329/4 , 330 , 331 , 332, 333 , 334 , 335 , 336/1 , 336/2 , 337 , 338 , 339 , 357,360, 361,362/ 1 , 362/2,363 , 364/1 , 364/2 , 364/3 , 364/4 , 365 , 366, 369 , 371 , 372 / 1,372/2,373,374,375 , 389, 390 , 427 , 428 , 429, 442, 443 , 444,445,446,447, 448 , 449, 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , Road , Nallah .
Boundry Description :
A- B : Line starts from point ' A ' in village Patala and proceed along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 446 , 447, 449, 448, 443 , 456 , 457 , then crosses road , again passes along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 375 , 372/ 2,372/ 1 , 371,369 , 273 , 272 , 259/1 , 258 , 243/2 , 243/1 , 245 , 246 , 247/1 , then crosses Nallah and common village boundry on villages Patala and Naglone then proceed through village Naglone along the outer boundry of plot numbers 106 , 107/1 and meets at point ' B ' .
B -C : Line passes through village Naglone along the outer boundry of plot numbers 107/1 , 102 , 101 , 100 / A , 100/B , crosses road , again passes with the outer boundary of plot numbers 45 , 44/1 , them crosses common village boundry of villages Naglone and palasgaon then proceed through village Palasgaon along with the outer boundry ofplot numbers 247/8 , 247/7 , 248 and meets at Point ' C' .
C-D : Line passes through village Palasgaon along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 248 , 249 , 247/1 , 246/ 2A, 245, 235 , 236, 237 , then crosses common village boundary of vilages Palasgaon and Naglone and proceed through village Naglone along the outer boundary of plot numbers 61/4 , 62 , then again crosses common village boundary of villages Naglone and Shivjinagar and proceed through village Shivjinagar along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 45, 44, 43 , 42 , crosses nallah then again passes along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 28 , 29/1 , 29/2 , 19 ( Forest ) , 18 , 17 , 71 , 34 , 20 ( Forest ) , 15/1 , 15/2 , 13/1 , 13/2 , then 323/1 of village Patala , then again procced through village Shivjinagar along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 12 , 10 , 74 , 11/2 , 11 / 1A , then crosses common village boundary of villages Shivjinand Patala and proceed through village Patala along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 333 , 338 , 339 and meets at Point ' D ' .
D- A : Line passes through village Patala along wih the outer boundary of ploi numbers 339 , 337 , 336/2 , 336/1 , 329/3 , 357 , 329/1 , 360 , 390 , 389 , 366 , 293/2 , 293/1 , 369 , 371,372 /1,372/ 2,375 , 174 , en crosses road and again passes along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 427 , 428 , 429 , again russe boundary of plot numbres 456 , 455 , 454 , 447 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 ano ad then passes along the outer tarting Poin ' A' .
[ F. No. 43015 / 9 / 2009 - PRIW - I ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.
[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 6214
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 /BHADRA 20 , 1932
4
5
3
2
1
90
00
02
1990
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर , 2010
झिंकिदादर
54
00
04
1907
89
00
00
1908
73
00
01
1909
64
00
02
1943
का.आ. 2325.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप- सम्बलपुर-रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन " बिछाई जानी चाहिये;
10
00
00
1942
41
09
00
1945
10
00
00
1938
31
00
00
1936
00
61
1935
00 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि , जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
04
00
01
1934
01
00
1933
00
00
1932
88
00
2126
04
55
00
00 अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है;
1946
63
02
1595
00
02
63
00
1592
00
07
01
1156
02
00
67
1157
45
00
00
1158
01
00
1159
00
81
00
1160
30
00
01
1161
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री सुकान्त कुमार प्रधान , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप- सम्बलपुर- रायपुर - राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 1295 , फॉरेस्ट पार्क, भुवनेश्वर-751009 ( उड़ीसा ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेंगा ।
00
00
1162
अनुसूची
55
00
03
1163
राज्य-उड़ीसा
तहसील - रेढ़ाखोल जिला-सम्बलपुर
00
28
00
1155
क्षेत्रफल
प्लाट नं.
गांव का नाम
00
00
1172
40
वर्ग
हेक्टेयर एयर
00
81
00
1171
मीटर
00
00
40
1170
3
4
2
5
35 1
00
02
1173
00
31
00
93
1169
00
02
1888
झिंकिदादर
51
00
00
1174
00
00
19
2111
00
34
1177
04.
04
00
36
1991
00
00
1175
08
83
02
00
1974
91
00
00
1176
36
00
15
1975
00
00
10
1192
10
00
00
1977
06
1-3
1191
00
13
00
1978
00
6
03
1186
02
19
00
1984
00
00
1187
75
00
00
1980
10
03
00
1188
00
04
89
1981
00
002
51
1189
00
13
72
1989 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
2
3
4
5 1190
00
झिंकिदादर
00
28 1102
00
06
74
00
1101
07
23 1100
00
20
23 2097
00
00
83 961
00
07
960
00
01
46 2084
00
09
51 962
00
00
79 959
00
00
64 958
00
00
31 973
06
00
67 963
00
02
11 964
00
01
20 967
00
00
10 965
00
00
20 99
00
01
62 76
00
04
79 81
00
04
00
00
00
10 82
00
05
28
00
00
83
10 80
00
00
10 56
00
01
99 55
00
00
71 2128
00
01
74 38
00
03
80 49
00
58
01
00
39
08
31 48
00
00
10 47
00
01
81 45
00
03
76 46
00
00
10
00
44
03
02 43
00
01
08 24
00
03
97 23
00
00
69 25
00
05
80 22
00
04
28 21
00
03
36 20
00
00
10 1
00
40
68
6215
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010 / भाद्र 20 , 1932
1
2
4
3
5 394
00
01
72 खजुरिझरण
00
393
03
92 396
00
05
05 397
00
06
81 398
00
00
57 405
00
40
34 399
00
00
71 400
00
08
88 401
00
04
33 403
00
00
10 402
00
00
27 344
00
21
47 345
00
11
73 346
00
05
19 342
00
08
21 348
00
02
51 350
00
00
58 338
00
03
90 399
00
04
00 कुलहमलिया
402
00
05
51 405
00
12
67 406
00
03
03 556
00
17
41 418
00
00
10 416
00
06
69 415
00
05
14 414
00
02
54 420
00
09
21 475
00
01
00 474
00
00
64 473
00
03
472
00
02
88 478
00
00
53 471
00
02
20 490
00
01
14 470
00
00
82 491
00
02
54 492
00
09
20 489
00
00
77 469
00
00
10 6216
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 /BHADRA 20 , 1932
2
4
5
3
1 1
00
01
74 493
कुलहमलिया
बडकुडा
42 494
00
02
464
65
00
02
01
495
00
08
00
02
02 496
01
48 497
00
00
01
21 498
00
01
499
28
00
10 500
00
01
511
00
73 501
00
02
42
01
502
00
60
62 503
00
01
00
04
09 504
09
509
00
03 604
00
40
00
505
00
00
40
00
506
05
00 596
00
00
20
00
65 507
00
00
10
00
508
00
48
10
98
12
90
00
29
00
52 97
00
00
47 96
02
00
10 94
00
00
09
42 91
19 87
00
00
75
00
00
83
00
00
47 82
74
00
44
07
77
00
04
20
47
39 75
00
88
00
42
02
43
00
13
45
94
00
00
44
24
00
18
35 25
00
00
49
12
00
22
07
25 573
00
03
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 3
4
2
5 00
84 2385
39
00
13.
78 2383
17 00
02
2381
70
9) 2394
02
50 00
2208
00
09
90 2209
2216
00
00
63
55 2218
10
00
42
67
00
2393
04
2219
00
00
92 2221
16
2226
00
00
2167
00
01
61
69 2165
00
12
2163
00
70
05
2648
00
00
10
74 1193
00
02
07
00
1195
40 00
00
20 1194
00
(X)
1247
81
45
00
1246
00
00
10 1248
02
00
00
81 1251
00
01
62 1245
00
1244
00
43 00
01
1196
17 1266
00
02
00
03
1264
60 1265
05
00
76
16 1263
00
00
1268
00
06
105 1269
00
99
03
00
02
1273
46
02
02
1271
00
000
27 1272
00
05
00
1313
82 00
00
20 1318
00
00
81 1314
00
1311
00
81 1315
00
00
20 भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1
2
3
4
5 अडकुडा
1312
01
21 1283
00
00
49 1284
00
00
10 1310
00
00
16 1306
00
06
55 1305
00
01
21 1304
(01
21 7555
00
82 1340
00
00
90 255-4
00
83 1355
00
01
30 1356
00
01
62 1076
00
05
16 1357
00
10
00
1364
00
00
75 1365
00
00
81 1366
00
00
81 1074
00
00
22 1372
00
00
81 1369
00
00
40 1367
00
01
25 2461
00
00
38 1370
00
00
70 1371
00
00
25 1368
00
02
02 1383
00
03
15 1382
00
00
40 1072
00
00
14 1058
00
04
18 2547
00
00
33 1057
00
00
63 1049
00
03
63 1048
00
02
82 1388
00
00
10 1050
00
00
51 1047
00
03
13 1046
00
02
01 1045
00
02
09 1036
00
01
20 2544
00
01
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
1
2
3
4
बडकुडा
1035
00
(1)
2545
00
(02
1034
00
00
1032
00
01
1031
00
01
1033
00
02
1022
00
01
2542
00
(X)
1019
00
1021
00
00
1020
00
03
1018
00
00
1015
00
01
1013
00
10
102:1
00
00
533
00
01
538
00
00
537
00
03
536
00
00
57 535
00
00
5 540
00
00
546
00
05
547
00
00
548
00
01
549
551
550
00
03
2424
00
2423
00
567
00
(U
566
00
03
561
00
01
00 565
00
00
564
00
00
563
00
00
05 562
00
04
588
00
04
16 590
00
04
is 589
591
(0) [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
= 6218
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/BHADRA 20, 1932
4
5
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
27
02
00
73
19 नारायणपुर
00
00
496
बडकुडा
10
00
00
147
37
02
00
592
37
33
00
6
00
01
00
495
01
01
00
5
17
04
00
494
31
00
00
10
3
00
00
593
25
01
61
00
00
1135
00
खण्डहता
486
63
00
04 10
00
00
485
966
10
14
44 00
00
00
477
947
23
50
00
01
05
00
484
940
88
14 03
07 2416
00
939
79
91 00
03 414
00
942
04
04
00
407
25
04
00
936
00
00
46
83
04
00
1669
78
05
00
10
00
00
315
तिलेइमाल
20
00
00
408
:7
00
265
45
00
405
00
264
58
37
00
404
02
00
262
74
09
00
ال
06
00
263
80
01
00
2
01
00
261
10
02
00
314
नारायणपुर
04
00
708
बडबाहाल
30
59
(1)
200
71
11
00
709
24
05
100
177
57
00
07
711
10
00
178
09
00
712
83
00
329
60
(09
00
713
01
05
136
15
24
00
716
78
02
00
124
67
03
00
717
76
00
00
123
08
01
00
718
59
05
00
122
39
02
00
693
79
00
00
125
(۴)
02
00
598
04
01
00
126
13
.00
02
633
73
00
00
127
75
00
632
23
00
03
116
58
05
00
623
60
00
00
117
87
00
0.3
809
63
03
00
115
20
04
00
624
22
01
00
114
89
00
01
625
03
143
00
30
04
00
479
26
01
00
76
20
00
01
477
75
01
00
75
11
00
01
441
23
05
الله
00
()
00
444
43
(0)
00
72 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 11, 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5 बडबाहाल
472
00
05
01 474
00
00
54 473
00
06
09 470
00
11
07 482
00
0.3
98 545
00
00
55 544
00
02
71 543
00
03
21 542
00
10
06 540
00
02
75 537
00
04
52 533
00
03
62 536
00
18
12 519
00
01
51 387
झरामुण्डा
00
06
78 388
00
05
79 386
00
03
56 392
00
04
35 383
00
00
55 583
00
10
78 371
00
03
34 382
00
05
64 379
00
03
00 378
00
08
81 376
00
00
56 381
00
01
90 377
00
01
57 केलाकटा
242
00
03
55 334
00
01
42 331
00
01
62 332
00
03
88 337
00
00
10 338
00
00
24 330
01
27 329
00
00
81 328
00
00
81 326
00
00
81 327
00
00
60 323
00
00
87 324
00
02
77
521 1
2
3
केलाकटा
325
00
01
7 322
00
01
321
00
00
254
00
00
73 255
00
05
319
00
318
00
05
44 317
00
00
256
00
40 257
00
00
71 265
00
66 264
00
이
62 263
00
00
37 262
00
00
21 261
00
01
24 267
00
02
35 268
00
01
37 224
00
03
35 270
00
01 273
00
00
81 274
00
02
80 272
00
62 283
00
04
20 275
00
02
46 276
00
02
23 277
00
01
62 278
00
00
89 280
00
04
17 279
00
00
20 195
00
00
10 186
00
00
75 160
00
06
61 161
00
01
98 162
00
04
07 163
00
01
33 171
00
04
17 170
00
04
20 169
00
04
52 166
00
00
13 168
00
00
17 GAZETECT INDIA: SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 /BHADRA 20 ,
5
60
00
कन्दुकटा
13
(0)
10
60
1:
76
33
25
85
13
09
42
56
00
(税)
97
00
!!
73
100
)
35
84
47
53
62
60
18
10
10
53
86
69
79
87
50
36
20
53
37
7.1
4:
38
(X )
101
A 106
135
00
5 134
136
601
137
150
131
120
128
156
155
154
10 159
(6)
(X)
( X) 160
00
03
00
04
(3)
167
GO
165
( 人)
182
(6)
181
00
186
11
9:
457
A)
456
(1)
455
st
(X) .
00
451
(7 )
12.
41
(4) | भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 11 , 2010 / भाद्र 20 , 1932
2
3
4
5
1 422
00
01
09 पुरुणागड 415
00
00
29 416
00
06
18 417
00
01
35 418
00
00
85
00
04
39 406
कुहि 395
00
00
52 407
00
10
12 327
03
16
00
328
00
02
07 32.6
00
06
65 317
01
00
63 279
00
19
82
00
283
01
30
00
284
09
13 207
00
10
88 158
00
10
91
164
00
00
17
00
163
02
02
00
162
01
01
120
00
10
85
121
00
01
22
170
00
01
28
00
118
03
09
00
119
04
01
112
00
01
45
111
00
09
48
00
113
00
95
00
04
104
87
00
03
101
93
00
03
20
102
00
103
00
10
100
00
01
18
60
00
03
54
51
00
04
09
52
00
37
04
05
00
54
54
55
08
00
38
6221 2
3
4
5 50
50
00
07 23
00
00
10 986
00
12
14 992
00
06
90
00
37
45
86 472
00
04
65 498
00
03
30 453
00
04
76 451
00
05
75 454
00
42
01
495
00
03
11 496
00
06
07 455
00
00
92 450
41 00
01
428
00
01
92 424
00
02
02
417
00
16
04
423
00
00
22 425
00
00
31 418
00
07
03 422
00
00
62 407
00
03
91 419
00
03
02 00
406
03
404
00
01
16 405
00
00
10 403
00
04
53 00
399
02
83 398
00
00
67 401
00
01
35 400
00
03
42 384
00
03
46 00
385
00
10 00
06
393
75 00
394
00
10 392
00
01
70 .
00
387
04
53 391
00
00
10 [ PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 6222
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 / BHADRA 20 , 1932
5
4
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
93
00
02
पोडाबलण्डा
00
01
27
1863
388
कुहि
08
00
1821
97
00
01
40 390
00
10
00
1862
44
03
389
00
66
00
02
1819
26
41
276
00
21
00
01
1820
00
00
30
202
00
05
00
1830
00
68
00
277
00
59
00
1818
51
00
00
274
00
00
1817
40 00
06
47
273
25
(01
00
1816
03
272
00
11
00
10
1823
00
52
00
03
2272
पोडाबलण्डा
00
89
01
1831
67
00
2263
00
01
00
29
1832
03
23
00
2271
00
28
00
1814
33
00
03
2270
00
10
00
1829
00
96
2265
02
00
04
27
1833
00
2266
01
73
00
00
51
1328
13
00
02
2268
02
43
1327
00
2267
00
00
30
01
79
2559
00
00
01
97
2247
00
10
1322
00
42
2246
00
00
01
73
1325
00
00
76
2086
19
31
02
1326
00
00
12
09
2095
93
00
05
1331
00
10
00
2109
14
00
00
1311
00
01
06
2108
92
00
00
1310
36
00
04
2107
99
00
00
1333
00
2106
04
01
26
00
00
1335
00
03
66
2105
00
27
1285
01 00
01
51
2104
00
01
20
1284
00
72
02
2103
02
00
02
1281
01
00
96
2102
00
(01
20
1282
00
00
51
2130
00
1280
01
31
20
00
05
2131
00
00
63
1283
31
00
02
2132
00
01
13
1279
00
05
2134
02
00
01
1234
00
01
80
2135
00
06
1235
87 00
00
47
2136
00
00
10
1236
10
00
00
2137
[0
00
OC
2557
00
01
46
1866
(0)
03
15
1249
21
01
00
1864
00
1245
(01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3
4
5 पोडाबलण्डा 1244
00
00
90 1242
00
02
34 1243
00
00
88 1178
00
01
41 1179
00
00
96 1177
00
02
26 1176
00
00
13 1174
00
02
42 1184
00
00
18 1175
00
00
27 2556
00
02
60 1167
00
08 1170
00
02
10 1171
00
00
19 1173
00
00
76 1172
00
03
39 1138
00
01
10 1090
00
00
90 1088
00
00
18 1089
00
02
02 1086
00
00
10 1085
00
03
18 1084
00
03
15 1082
00
04
17 1091
00
02
13
00
1080
03
75 1042
00
00
10 1043
00
00
41 1044
00
02
24 1046
00
06
73 1045
00
00
10 941
00
02
98 942
00
00
95 944
00
04
01 945
00
00
24 1030
00
00
19 950
00
02
07 949
00
02
14 948
00
00
17
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
6223 1
2
3
4
5 पोडाबलण्डा 951
00
00
66 953
00
03
10 952
00
04
17 966
00
07
57 969
00
00
10 964
00
00
10 965
00
02
46 971
00
03
89 972
00
00
74 962
00
05
93 424
00
00
26 425
00
04
30 427
00
04
75 428
00
00
51 429
00
02
02 422
00
00
15 430
00
02
19 432
00
01
41 433
00
02
55 434
00
00
60 435
00
12
21 440
00
09
83 466
00
07
08 467
00
00
10 464
00
06
45 470
00
03
97 471
00
05
79 460
00
08
09 456
00
00
28 458
00
02
28 459
00
02
02 301
00
01
95 293
00
00
37 292
00
00
82 291
00
09
04 295
00
01
16 296
00
01
13 290
00
10
52 6224
PARI !
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/ BHADRA 20, 1932
4
3
2
08
00
1482
बडमाल
02
00
1475
01
00
1476
02
00
1472
08
1470
00
00
00
1471
07
00
1454
03
00
1453
05
00
1452
00
06
2569
बारबांक
14
00
2570
10
00
2567
00
06
2568
02
00
2566
07
00
2495
05
00
2565
08
00
2496
01
00
2491
00
00
2492
02
00
2493
08
00
2494
00
00
2489
00
00
2470
02
00
2466
00
00
2463
02
00
2465
00
2464
00
2456
00
00
02
2457
00
00
2460
01
00
2458
00
00
2459
01
2224
00
05
00
2425
02
00
2429
08
00
2430
01
00
2433
04
00
2417
01
00
2415
06
00
2416
00
00
2410
2
3
1
5
00
2411
82 बारबांक
00
2409
29
00
1318
77
00
1302
12
00
1304
19
00
1303
68
00
1305
99
لف
1312
84
00
1313
11
00
1306
68
(2)
1509
75
1308
55
66
1396
14
1284
81
2671
72
2672
45
1252
00
1251
65
1343
40
00
1250
71
1349
10
42
64
1245
10
40
:
10
45
42
10
11:35
10
1160
21
10
116!
67
1246
98
1162
97
14
00
1163
25
()
1165
43
1166
67
1152
21
1138
84
1140 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
6225 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 बारबांक
1137
00
05
25
बारबांक
659
00
11
15 1139
00
00
10
662
00
02
21 597
00
02
23
664
00
01
93 1136
00
02
77
665
00
00
90 600
00
03
92
663
00
16
89 599
00
00
10
393
00
02
50 601
00
06
11 हेलाइ
1426
00
02
05 602
00
00
18
1409
00
16
81 603
00
03
47
1410
00
13
56 604
00
03
26
1404
00
01
93 605
00
05
82
00
1403
11
14 2637
00
00
10
1398
00
02
04 606
00
02
30
1399
00
15
18 607
00
06
56
1396
00
00
37 612
00
03
86
1493
00
05
58 539
00
00
10
1485
00
04
81 529
00
00
14
1394
00
00
84 613
00
04
03
1330
00
00
28 528
00
00
10
1332
00
01
50 00
616
03
13
1331
00
05
07 617
00
03
38
1333
00
01
91 618
00
00
50
1340
00
01
61 622
00
01
43
1334
00
05
87 621
00
01
97
1335
00
02
99 624
00
04
10
1338
00
05
01 632
00
02
31
1336
00
03
89 631
00
00
80
1274
00
05
10 630
00
01
61
1275
00
00
27 625
00
00
20
1276
00
04
02 626
00
05
02
1277
00
05
50 627
00
02
47
1280
00
00
62 645
00
06
16
1278
00
09
31 00
398
01
41
1212
00
05
60 647
00
00
40
1279
00
06
15 646
00
00
10
1215
00
00
33 648
00
05
49
1214
00
05
61 00
649
02
17
1146
00
06
66 660
00
00
64
1145
06
06
01 655
00
00
30
1144
00
13
60 3484 GJ/ 10-11 [PARI 11 SEC. S THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/ BHADRA 20 , 1932
2
3
2
4
5
3
00
00
268
बारबांक
82
00
1143
08
धारबाक
8
02
00
267
10
00
00
1141
21
01
00
269
75
00
1142
(۲)
02
270
83
1520
01
00
266
00
06
1120
46
00
00
272
00
00
1519
66
6
00
01
271
62
01
00
1521
(X)
274
10
1522
نواده
00
09
264
33
1071
6
38
00
04
257
03
31
1119
19
(X)
04
258
43
00
11995
88
259
00
02
40
10
00
250
105
$6
07
00
251
72
00
083
(X)
א
(1)
249
10
235
98
03
1472
00
94
60
00
225
80
103
892
224
01
00
876
02
(X)
221
85
213
00
10 00
877
72
00
01
206
875
08
00
00
209
07
00
05
1571
02
204
00
00
10
878
00
205
00
03
46
870
00
00
203
00
10
00
74
07
00
194
888
00
94
01
1457
01
00
00
08
760
60
に
01 00
00
1554
10
00
1341
भूषाकाटा
04 00
97
02
757
1331
00
00
07 730
00
06
95
00
1261
00
00 729
00
54
00
1465
77
51
00
03
00
06
1262
08 00
57
05 726
07
00
1266
725
65
00
00
01
10
1278
12
01
1275
00
00
11
42
01
83
1276
00
17
74
00
01
00
1277
00
00
00
10
1233
00
07 00
05
16 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
2
3
4
5 1232
मृषाकाटा
00
00
64 1230
00
02
41 1229
00
03
13 1227
00
17
08 1228
00
01
20 1223
00
00
27 1224
00
05
51 1220
00
11
53 1298
00
01
42 1297
00
03
03 1295
00
13
52 1307
00
00
81 1308
00
00
33 1306
00
00
10 1305
00
01
33 1120
00
21
18 1129
00
00
10 1132
00
01
31 1131
00
05
36 1128
00
01
21 1127
00
01
05 1138
00
08
56 1091
00
01
29 1092
00
03
62 1090
00
09
14 1088
00
00
10 1089
00
00
24 1080
00
01
56 1079
00
04
97 1031
00
00
10
भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 11 , 2010 / भाद्र 20 , 1932
1
2
3
मूषाकाटा
794
00
795
00
798
00
797
00
796
00
824
00
2 853
00
852
00
836
00
03
851
00
02
87 850
00
01
849
00
07
05
861
00
00
847
00
08
74 846
00
01
05 845
00
05
00 882
00
00
20 883
00
17
26 884
00
01
885
00
02
886
00
01
62 887
00
06
13 1361
00
00
10 91
00
01
80 89
00
14
16 1359
00
02
91 88
00
05
33 87
00
01
13 1399
00
02
83
बाउँशजाल
779
00
01
76 780
00
07
65 775
00
03
13 1027
00
00
20 781
00
02
13 774
00
02
02 782
00
03
14 785
00
05
24 793
00
00
10 2426
00
02
74 2425
00
04
42 2420
00
03
44 2418
00
08
26 2419
00
02
74 2331
00
03
51 2300
00
01
79 2310
00
03
61 2311
00
00
69 2308
00
01
34 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/BHADRA 20, 1932
6228
1
4
5
3
2
1
बाउँशजाल
01
03
00
2312
बाउँशजाल
25
00
00
2307
22
02
2306
00
81
00
00
2305
28
00
00
2280
80
01
00
2304
87
01
00
2303
24
01
00
2302
03
66
00
2286
31
00
00
2288
02
93
00
2295
01
01
00
2294
10
00
00
2293
38
02
00
2291
26
00
00
2289
20
01
00
2290
42
01
00
2218
20
00
00
2510
46
00
35
06
00
2220
20
00
00
2224
00
02
62
2221
40
00
2213
10
00
00
2169
81
11
00
2212
60
00
00
2210
01
17
00
2211
60
00
2174
79
00
2176
41
01
00
98
13
00
1954
34
01
00
1951
55
00
00
1953
16
03
00
1952
35
01
00
1950
05
07
00
1947
53
00
01
1949
29
00
00
1946
67
01
00
1945
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) )
4
5 3
2
05
03
00
1944
98
04
00
1943
00
00
1942
13 00
01
1789
30
06
00
1788
65
00
00
1787
00
00
1762
00
00
1768
(
03
1785
3.3
00
1769
04
1771
10 1773
00
1772
1742
26 1741
1739
1740
13 00
00
1720
82 00
03
1721
01
00
1728
65 00
00
1727
10 00
00
1722
17
00
00
1726
00
02
1754
14
03
00
1723
01
00
1666
02
1754
00
01
00
2523
01
00
1635
01
00
69 1636
41
01
00
1634
21
00
1633
10
00
00
1632
90
05
00
919
00
57
00
893
30
00
04
920
04
02
00
921
70
00
00
914
00
08
933 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6229 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 बाउँशजाल
932
00
00
24 बाउँशजाल
72
00
59
66 938
00
01
99
00
32
04
04 937
00
02
66
29
00
06
82 936
00
01
17
28
00
16
02 942
00
03
69
23
00
09
36 304
00
05
09
27
00
00
49 303
00
00
96
24
00
10
73 305
00
00
38
2559
00
00
32 306
00
02
13
21
00
00
18 302
00
01
12
22
00
71
52 322
00
02
28
2558
00
05
39 301
00
01
30
58
00
07
35 323
00
00
25'
117
04
एरण्डिबाहाल
00
89 300
00
03
79
115
00
16
88 290
00
00
46
114
00
02
12 299
00
00
57
113
00
27
89 292
00
01
61
00
101
08
30 00
293
02
73
99
00
15
06 291
00
02
98
00
17
82 269
00
00
10
00
97
52
33 264
00
04
02
चारमाल
1483
00
14
50 266
00
00
93
केउटिबाहाल
354
00
75
57 265
00
04
40
353
00
17
54 274
00
00
16
404
00
08
30 259
00
05
61
352
00
02
51 260
00
00
66
366
00
13
02 257
00
00
43
351
00
29
24 256
00
04
91
504
00
39
मुगपाल
97 00
227
04
64
498
00
00
97 232
00
00
39
497
00
22
07 229
00
02
04
496
00
00
20 230
00
01
23
444
00
00
20 148
00
02.
70
00
494
04
22 235
00
02
33
434
00
12
51 00
116
13
71
166
01
03
46 00
115
03
25
167
00
70
20 00
2447
11
87
162
01
06
30 74
00
05
12
519
00
08
37 75
00
07
90 6230
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/ BHADRA 20 , 1932
4
1
5
2
3
1
00
41
02
518
लम्बखेता मुगपाल
45
00
66
152
92
00
30
141
01
00
48
150
00
00
148
64
76
00
20
147
मुचिबाहाल
70
00
01
93
00
09
81
94
42
08
95
00
20
00
16
47
00
10
00
42
76
43
00
01
00
03
75
44
55
00
17
36
85
00
13
18
76
00
18
22
67
00
51
कुल्हिआ बाहाल 132
00
12
14
131
65
15
00
121
10
00
02
118
95
00
37
111
47
00
05
145
12
82
00
144
07
00
02 143
42
16
00
141
36 81
00
19
09
99
00
138
00
00
29 139
21
00
10
136
58
00
00
137
05
00
01
132
00
66
11
130
04
73 129
00
00
01
85
17
00
22
76
00
10
25 74
15
00
00
87
65
00
75
लम्बखेता
210
00
04
29 162
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
4
3
5 2
00
00
10 209
00
61
161
69
41
47 00
136
35
61
00
40
00
01
72 48
45 00
13
1203
00
98
39
1197
96
35
00
1187
00
10
06
1186
58 00
02
1198
86 00
11
1185
40
00
03 1158
53 00
02
1157
52 00
36
1154
00
25 00
1149
00
72 00
1148
00
12
80 1147
00
17
05 878
00
19 904
11
71 00
01
905
05
97 00
901
10 906
00
00
58 907
00
03
56 00
04
908
00
03
952
00
88
06
00
951
00
949
00
40 00
956
04
18
86
32
986
00
984
00
75
36
00
61
50
167
67
00
20
157
75
00
08
155
71
03
00
196
00
06
55 145
00
05 144
01
09
00
143
14
00
71 141
01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
2
3
4
5 271
मुचिबाहाल
00
02
33 265
00
08
50 276
00
23
75 278
00
00
10 279
00
05
25 299
00
01
74 300
00
15
65 293
00
00
30 298
00
00
39 296
00
00
10 311
00
01
99 309
00
02
73 310
00
23
95 सत्यानन्दपालि 792
00
05
95 ओरफ गएलचरा 1131
00
01
14 788
00
04
38
[ F. No. R - 25011 / 35 /2010 -OR - 1 ]
बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 9th September , 2010
S.O. 2325. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur (Chhattisgarh) and Ranchi (Jharkhand), a " Paradip- Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Sukanta Kumar Pradhan , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Paradip - Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline Project, 1295 , Forest Park , Bhubaneswar - 751009 , (Orissa) .
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
6231
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Rairakhol
District : Sambalpur
State: Orissa Name of the Plot No.
Area
Village
Hectore Are Sq. mtr .
(1)
(2 )
(3)
(4)
(5) Jhinkidadar 1888
00
02
93 2111
00
00
19 1991
00
36
04 1974
00
02
83 1975
00
15
36 1977
00
00
10 1978
00
01
13 1984
00
02
19 1980
00
00
75 1981
00
04
89 1989
00
13
72 1990
00
02
90 1907
00
04
54 1908
00
00
89 1909
00
01
73 1943
00
02
64 1942
00
00
10 1945
00
09
41 1938
00
00
10 1936
00
00
31 1935
00
00
61 1934
00
01
04 1933
00
01
22 1932
00
00
99 2126
00
04
88 1946
00
00
55 1595
00
02
63 1592
00
02
63 1156
00
01
07 1157
00
02
67 1158
00
00
45 1159
00
01
63 1160
00
00
81 1161
00
01
30 [PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/BHADRA 20 , 1932
6232
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(5)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(2)
(1)
10
00
00
Jhinkidadar 83
00
40
00
1162
Jhinkidadar
10
00
00
80
00
03
55
1163
99
01
56
00
28
00
00
1155
7j
00
00
55
40
00
00
1172
74
00
01
2128
81
00
00
1171
80
03
00
38
40
00
00
1170
58
49
00
35
00
02
1173
31
00
08
39
31
00
00
1169
00
10
00
48
51
00
00
1174
81
01
47
00
34
04.
00
1177
76
03
00
45
00
80
00
1175
00
10
46
00 00
94
00
1176
02
03
00
44
00-
10
00
1192
08
00
43
01 06
14
00
1191
97
00
03
24
63
00
03
1186
00
59
00
23
63
00
00
1187
80
00
05
25
19
03
00
1188
28
00
04
22
02
51
00
1189
03
00
21
36
28
00
00
1190
10
00
00
20
74
06
00
1102
40
68
00
1
23
00
07
1101
72
01
00
23
00
20
1100
394
Khajurijharan
92
00
03
393
00
83
00
2097
05
05
00
396
00
11
07
961
81
06
00
397
46
00
01
960
00
57
00
398
51
00
09
2084
34
00
40
405
79
00
962
00
71
00
00
399
00
64
00
959
400
00
08
88 00
31
00
958
33
00
04
401
67
06
973
00
00
00
10
403
11
02
963
00
00
00
27
402
20
00
01
964
47
00
21
344
00
10
00
967
73
00
11
345
20
00
00
965
05
19
00
346
62
01
00
99
21
00
08
342
79
04
76
00
00
02
51
348
00
04
00
81
00
58
00
350
00
10
00
00
03
90
338
28
00
05
82 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]
6233 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(5) Kulhamalia 399
00
04
00 Kulhamalia
506
00
05
00 402
00
05
51
596
00
00
20 405
00
12
67
507
00
00
65 406
00
03
03
508
00
00
10 556
00
17
41
98
00
10
48 418
00
00
10
90
00
12
29 416
00
06
69
97
00
00
52 415
00
05
14
96
00
02
47 414
00
02
54
94
00
00
10 420
00
09
21
91
00
09
42 475
00
01
00
87
00
00
19 00
474
00
64
83
00
00
75 473
00
03
82
00
00
47 472
00
02
88
74
00
07
44 478
00
00
53
77
04
00
20 471
00
02
20
75
00
47
39 490
00
01
14
42
00
02
88 470
00
00
82
43
00
13
45 491
00
02
54
44
00
00
94 492
00
09
20
24
00
18
35 489
00
00
25
00
00
49 469
00
00
10
22
00
07
12 493
00
01
74
573
00
03
25 494
00
02
42
Barakura
2385
00
39
84 464
00
02
65
2383
00
13 .
78 495
00
01
08
2381
00
02
17 496
00
02
02
2394
00
70
90 497
00
01
48
2208
00
02
50 498
00
01
21
2209
00
09
90 499
00
01
28
2216
00
00
63 500
00
00
10
2218
00
10
55 511
00
01
73
2393
00
67
42 501
00
02
42
2219
00
04
34 502
00
01
60
2221
00
16
92 00
503
01
62
2226
00
00
56 504
00
04
09
2167
00
01
61 509
00
09
03
2165
00
12
69 604
00
00
40
2163
00
05
70 505
00
00
40
2648
00
00
10 3484 GJ / 10-12 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 / BHADRA 20 , 1932
(1)
(C)
(3)
(4)
(5) 1193
00
02
74 Barakura
1195
00
07
40
00
00
20 1247
(X)
(X)
81
00
00
45 1246
00
1248
02
10 1251
81
00
00
00
62 1245
00
1244
43 1196
40
00
1266
47
3
00
60
76 265
05
00
00
16 1268
OS
09
02
1273
46 1271
20
02
00
1272
27 13: 3
05
20 1318
00
1314
1311
81
00
1315
20 1312
090
21
00
1283
00
49 1,284
00
00
10 1310
00
00
16
00
06
55 1306
00
1305
01
21
00
1304
01
21
00
02
2555
82
00
00
90
00
02
83
01
00
30 1350
00
62
01
00
1076
05
16
00
00
10 1364
00
00
75
[ PART 11- SA 3 ( 1 )
...
( 5) (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
00
Barakura 1365
00
1366
00
00
১১ 1074
00
(0)
1372
00
00
81
00
1369
00
1367
00
01
2461
00
00
1370
00
00
25
00
00
1371
1368
00
02
00
03
1383
15 1382
00
00
14 1072
00
100
18
00
1058
00
2547
00
00
1057
00
1049
00
00
1048
00
1388
00
1050
1047
00
00
1046
00
1045
(02
1036
00
00
2544
00
1035
4 2545
00
1034
00
00
00
1032
10
00
() )
15 1031
1033
00
02
00
1022
01
(1)
00
20 2542
00
02
1019
00
1021
00
00
00
1020
03
00
1018
00
10 1015
01
64
00
1013
00
10
13 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1024
Barakura
00
00
26
Barakura
406
00
533
00
01
13
408
00
00
20 538
00
00
56
405
00
537
00
03
72
404
00
536
00
00
57
401
00
535
00
00
57
2
00
540
00
00
314
00
20 Narayanpur
546
00
05
51
200
00
547
00
00
17
177
00
06
24 548
00
01
64
178
00
00
10 549
00
03
69
329
00
04
85 551
00
02
45
136
00
01
05 550
00
03
14
124
00
02
78 2424
00
00
38
123
00
00
76 2423
00
00
10
122
00
05
59 567
00
04
11
125
00
00
79 566
00
03
96
126
00
04 561
00
01
69
127
00
00
73 565
00
00
14
116
00
03
23 564
00
00
40
117
00
00
60 563
00
00
95
115
00
03
63 562
00
04
72
114
00
01
22 588
00
04
16
143
0
03
08 590
00
04
18
76
00
589
00
00
42
75
00
01
75 591
00
01
41
74
00
05 00
496
00
72
19
00
01
43 592
00
73
02
00
37
02
27
147
495
00
01
00
00
10
00
6
00
494
33 00
04
37
17
5
00
01 593
00
01 00
10
3
00
00
31 486
00
09
61
Khandahata 1135
00
01
25 485
00
10
63
966
00
04
00 477
00
00
10
947
00
44
14 484
00
01
50
940
00
05
23 2416
00
03
88
939
00
07
14 414
00
05
79
942
00
03
91 407
00
04
04
936
00
04
25 2516
00
00
46
1669
00
04
83 [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 6236
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 / BHADRA 20 , 1932
(4)
(5)
(3)
(2)
(1)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(1)
(2)
0.6
78
10
00
00
315
387
00
Jharamunda
Tileimal
79
0.5
37
00
09
00
388
265
56 00
74
00
0.3
386
264
00
35
00
56
0.4 02
00
392
262
55
00
00 00
10
00
383
263
78
93
04
10. 00
583
00
261
34 09
04
00
0.3 00
371
708
Badabahal
71
05
64
00
00
11
709
382
00
57
03 00
07
379
711
81
68
08
(0
00
09
378
712
56
00
60
09
713
00
376
90
24
01 716
00
15
381
67
57 00
01 03
377
717
55
03
08
01
00
718
242
Kelkata
42
39
0
00
02
693
334
00
0.9
01
62 02
00
598
331
00
13
03
88 02
00
633
332
75
00
10 00
11
00
632
337
24
58
0.5
00
00 00
623
338
0.3
87
27 00
00
01 80.9
330
81 04
20.
624
00
00
00
329
81 00
89
00 01
00
625
328
81
30
00
04
00 479
326
00
20
60 00
01
00 477
00
327
04
11
00
00
00
87 441
323
.0
77
37
02 00
00
444
324
71 05
01
01 472
00
00
325
20
20
54
01 00
00
474
322
06
91
09
00 473
00
00
321
0.7
00
11
73 470
00
00
254
98
00
0.3
482
27
03
00
255
00
55
00
545
17
00
00
319
71
0.2
00
544
00
44
05
318
21
0.3
00
543
70
00
00
317
0.6
00
10
542
40
00
256
03
0.2
75
00
540
71
00
00
257
52
00
04
537
66
00
08
265
62
00
03
533
62
01
00
264
12
00
18
536
00
37
00
263
51
00
01
519 6237 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010 / भाद्र 20 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) Kelkata
262
00
Kelkata
38
00
00
00
21
02
46
00
261
00
10
97 01
2
410
267
00
35
00
00 02
73 00
01
35 01
268
37
411
00
00
412
00
00
84 224
03
35
385
Kendukata
05
47 270
00
01
01
00
05 00
00
00
81
384
273
53 274
00
386
00
01
80
62 02
00
00
272
62
387
02 01
42
388
00
283
00
04
20
04
60 00
275
02
389
00
18
01
46
276
00
02
383
00
00
23
10 00
00
62
01 277
381
01
53
00
86
382
00 278
00
00
89
380
00
00
69 280
00
04
17
00
01
379
79 279
00
00
20
368
00
01
87 195
00
00
10
366
00
01
50 186
00
00
75
365
00
36
02 06
160
00
61
81
00
07
20 00
01
161
98
87
00
01
53 162
00
04
07
86
00
00
37 163
00
01
33
89
00
00
74 171
00
04
17
88
00
00
72 00
170
04
20
00
04
94
102
169
00
04
52
90
00
02
86 166
00
00
13
00
02
101
38 168
00
00
17
00
100
00
57 175
00
00
60
103
00
00
10 00
116
01
13
00
135
03
80 00
119
03
18
134
00
03
23 00
118
04
60
136
00
00
10 00
04
117
76
133
00
01
61 00
115
00
33
109
00
00
92 114
00
02
25
91
132
00
01 26
00
04
85
130
00
02
00 35
00
03
13
00
131
00
22 00
13
09
39
129
00
05
07 36
00
01
42
00
128
01
52 00
56
00
37 6238
[ PART II - SEC. 3 ( 11) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 /BHADRA 20 , 1932
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) (1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
(5)
82 Kendukata 147
03
68
00
279
00
19
Purunagara
00
10
156
00
01
283
00
00
78
00
09
13 155
284
154
00
02
10
00
207
10
88 10
00
66
00
10
91 159
168
10
00
00
158
00
17
164
00
10
160
00
00
02
00
02
163
03
76
161
00
00
01
01
162
18
167
00
04
85
10
120
00
00
05
24
165
01
121
00
00
09
07
182
170
00
01
28 00
06
03
181
00
(3)
118
03 00
186
02
09
01
119
00
04 07
00
25
}
00
01
112
00
07
70
442
Purunagara
48
111
09
00
00
06
445
07
95
00
00
113
457
00
08
03
$87
00
04
104
456
00
01
86
93
00
03
103
455
00
02
71
00
03
102
450
04
47
00
00
00
103
00
452
00
58
00
100
01
18 451
00
98
04
00
60
03
51 423
00
01
37
10
00
04
51
00
04
88
412
01
00
52
37 00
00
413
26
05
54
00
00
00
411
69
38
00
08
55
05
414
00
69
07
50
00
50 422
00
01
09
(0
10
23
00
00
00
29
415
00
986
12
14 06
416
00
18
992
00
06
(X) 00
35
01
417
86
37
00
45 418
00
00
86
00
04
65
Kuhi
472
00
406
04
39
498
00
03
30 00
00
52
395
453
04
76
00
00
10
12
407
75
451
00
05 00
03
16
327
454
01
00
00
37
328
02
495
00
03 326
06
00
65
496
07
00
06 317
00
01
63
455
00
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6239 भारत का राजषत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010 / भाद्र 20 , 1932
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(4)
(5)
(3)
Kuhi
450
00
01
41
00
Podabalanda 2266
01
73 428
00
01
92
00
02
13
2268
424
00
02
02
2267
00
00
30 417
00
04
16
2247
00
01
97 423
00
00
22
2246
00
00
42 425
00
00
31
2086
00
19
76 418
00
07
03
2095
00
12
09 422
00
00
62
2109
00
00
10 407
00
03
91
2108
00
01
06 00
419
03
02
2107
00
04
36 00
406
03
91
2106
00
04
01 404
00
01
16
2105
00
03
66 405
00
00
10
2104
00
01
51 403
04
00
53
2103
00
02
72 00
02
399
83
2102
00
01
96 00
398
00
67
2130
00
00
51 401
00
01
35
00
2131
05
20 400
00
03
42
2132
00
02
31 384
00
03
46
2134
00
02
05 385
00
00
10
00
2135
01
80 393
00
06
75
2136
00
00
47 394
00
00
10
00
2137
00
10 392
00
01
70.
1866
00
01
46 387
00
04
53
1864
00
01
21 391
00
00
10
1863
00
02
93 388
00
27
01
1821
00
40
08 390
00
01
97
00
1862
00
10 00
389
03
44
00
1819
02
66 276
00
26
41
1820
00
01
21 202
00
00
30
00
05
1830
00 277
00
00
68
1818
00
00
59 00
00
274
51
1817
00
00
40 273
00
06
47
1816
00
01
25 00
272
03
11
00
00
1823
10 2272
00
Podabalanda
03
52
1831
01
00
89 2263
00
00
67
1832
00
01
29 2271
00
03
23
00
1814
00
28 00
2270
03
33
1829
00
00
10 00
2265
02
96
04
1833
27
00 6240
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 /BHADRA 20 , 1932
(2)
(3)
(5) (3)
.(4)
(5)
(1)
(4) (1)
(2)
00
03 00
39 00
51
1172
Podabalanda
Podabalanda 1328
01
10
00
00
43
1138
1327
02
00
00
90
1090
00
01
79
2559
00 00
00
18 1322
00
10
1088
00
02
02 00
01
1089
1325
73
00
10 00
00
1086
31
02
1326
00
03
18
1085
00
05
93
1331
00
03
15
1084
1311
00
14
00
00
04
17
92
1082
00
00
1310
00
02
13
99
1091
00
00
1333
00
03
75
26
1080
00
00
1335
00
00
10
1042
00
01
27
1285
00
00
41
1043
00
01
20
1284
00
02
24
1044
00
02
02
1281
73
1046
00
06 1282
00
01
20
00 01
1045
00
10 00
31
1280
941
00
02
98 00
00
63
1283
95
00
00 00
01
13
942
1279
01
00
04
01 00
72
944
1234
00
00
24 00
945
06
87
1235
00
19 00
10
1030
00 1236
00
07
950
00
02 00
00
10
2557
00
02
14 03
949
1249
15
00
00
17 00
01
21
00
948
1245
00
90
00
66 00
00
951
1244
00
03
953
10 02
34
1242
00
00
04
17
952
1243
00
00
88
07
57 00
41
966
00
01
1178
00
00
00
10
96
969
00
1179
10
26
964
00
00 02
00
1177
02
00
00
00
13
965
1176
46
00
03
89 00
971
42
02
1174
00
972
00
74
18
00
00
1184
962
00
05
93 00
27
00
1175
26
424
00
02
60
00 2556
00
425
04
00
30 01
00
08
1167
04
427
75 00
02
00
10
1170
00
428
00
51 00
00
19
1171
00
429
02 00
00
76
02 1173 6241 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
(3)
(4)
(4) (1)
(2)
(5)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(1)
00
00
45
00
Podabalanda 422
15 Barabank
2496
08 430
00
00
02
19
01
00
2491
00
432
01
41
2492
00
00
65 00
433
00
02
55
02
40
2493
434
00
00
00
71
60
2494
08 435
00
'12
21
00
00
2489
10 00
440
09
42
83
2470
00
00 466
00
07
08
00
2466
02
64 467
00 00
00
10
00
2463
10 06
2465
464
00
45
00
02
40
00
470
00
00
2464
03
97
10 05
471
00
2456
00
00
45
79
00
460
08
09
2457
00
02
42
00 456
00
00
28
2460
00
10 00
45€
28
2458
01 02
00
21 459
00
00 02
02
2459
00
10 301
00
01
95
2224
00
01
67 00
293
00
37
2425
00
05
98 00
00
2429
292
82
00
02
97 291
00
09
04
00
08
2430
14 01
16
295
00
00
25
01
2433
00
296
01
00
43
13
2417
04 10
52
290
00
2415
01
67
00
00
Badamal
1482
00
08
82
2416
06
21 00
1475
02
29
2410
00
00
84 1476
00
01
2411
87
00
02 1472
00
00
10 02
12
2409
00
1470
00
08
19
00
07
00
1318
00
1471
00
68
1302
00
03
83 00
07
99
1304
20 1454
00
14 1453
03
84
3
94 00
1303
00
00
50 00
05
03 1452
li
1305
00
28 2569
00
06
68
Barabank
1312
00
14
00
00
75
10
1313
2570
00
2567
10
00
10
1306
00
55
00
71 2568
1309
04 00
06
66
00
00
95 2566
02
14
1308
02 07
81
1296
00
04
44 2495
00
66
00
07 00
05
72
1284
2565
348497 /10-13 6242
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 /BHADRA 20 , 1932
(5)
(1)
(4)
(2)
(3)
(1)
76 Barabank
00
06
2671
Barabank
25
00
06
2672
13
00
01
1252
35
00
06
1251
79
00
01
1243
00
80
00
1250
01
02
00
1249
20
01
00
1244
01
31
00
1245
82
00
02
1248
01
81
00
1247
00
10
00
1158
00
00
20 1159
10
00
00
1155
00
00
60 1160
42
02
00
1161
45
00
00
1246
00
02
83 1162
04
78
00
1164
23
00
1163
00
40
00
02
1165
00
90
01
1166
00
30
00
1152
00
04
05
1138
10
00
00
1140
25
05
00
1137
10
00
00
1139
23
00
02
597
00
02
77 1136
92
00
03
600
10
00
00
599
Helai
06
13
00
601
00
00
18 602
47
00
03
603
26
00
03
604
05
00
605
10
00
2637
00
30
00
606
56
00
06
607
[PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii) |
(4)
(2)
(3)
80 612
00
03
00
10 00
539
14 529
C)
00
00
04
03 613
00
00
10 528
00
03
13 616
38 617
00
03
00
00
50 618
43 622
00
01
01
97 00
621
04
0 624
00
(1)
31 632
00
80
00
631
00
61 00
01
630
20 00
00
625
05
02 626
00
02
00
627
16 00
06
645
41 00
01
398
00
00
40 647
10 00
00
646
49 00
05
648
02
17 00
649
00
00
64 000
00
30
00
355
659
00
15
21 00
02
662
(0)
93 664
01
665
00
90
89 00
16
663
50 00
393
02
05 1425
00
16
81
00
1409
56 00
1410
13
93 00
01
1404
14 00
11
1403
04
02
00
1398
00
15
18 1399
00
37
00
1396 [ भाग !!- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010/ भाद्र 20 , 1932
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1) Helai
1493
00
05
58 Helai 1485
00
04
81 1394
00
00
84
00
1330
00
28 1332
00
50 1331
00
05
07
00
01
1333
1340
00
01
1334
00
05
87
(K) 1335
00
02
1338
00
05
0. 1336
03
00
89 1274
00
05
10 1275
00
00
27 1276
00
04
02
00
1277
05
50
00
1280
00
62 1278
00
09
31
00
1212
05
60
00
1279
06
15 1215
00
00
33 1214
00
05
61 1146
00
06
66 1145
00
06
01
00
13
1144
60
00
1143
08
82 1141
00
00
10 1142
00
06
75 1520
00
02
83 1120
00
00
46 1519
00
00
66 1521
00
01
62
00
00
1522
10 1071
00
00
33
03
1119
00
31 1095
00
04
43 1093
00
02
40 1082
00
05
56 1083
00
00
72
6243
(5) (2)
(3)
(4)
963
00
08
01
98 894
00
03
893
00
05
94 892
00
03
80 876
00
06
09 874
00
01
85 877
00
00
72 875
00
03
08 00
95 871
07
878
00
00
10 870
00
45
03
869
00
10
00
00
94 888
01
760
60 00
08
1554
00
00
10 00
757
97
02
730
00
95
06
729
00
00
54 728
00
03
51 726
00
07
57 725
00
01
65 721
00
42
11
722
00
74
01
724
00
00
10 304
00
05
16 268
00
00
70 267
00
02
82 269
00
01
21 270
00
02
01 266
00
06
01
20 272
00
00
62 271
00
01
274
00
00
77 264
00
09
69 257
00
04
38 00
19 258
04
259
00
88
02
250
00
80
10
251
00
47
07 6244
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010 / BHADRA 20 , 1932
(1)
(5)
(3)
(4)
(2)
(1)
Musakata
18
00
00
249
Helai
12
24
00
235
01
25
00
1472
09
58
00
225
24
00
01
224
34
00
02
221
36
00
10
213
72
01
00
206
49
00
00
209
42
00
02
204
13
00
00
205
33
01
00
203
74
00
07
194
54
01
00
1457
42
01
00
1341
Musakata
83
00
04
1331
00
00
07
1261
00
00
10
1465
06
00
1262
68
05
00
1266
56
00
10
1278
12
01
00
1275
01
83
00
1276
00
94
00
1277
06
07
00
1233
00
64
00
1232
41
02
00
1230
13
00
03
1229
08
17
00
1227
20
00
01
1228
27
00
00
1223
00
51
05
1224
11
53
00
1220
42
01
00
1298
03
03
00
1297
52
13
.00
1295
81
00
00
1307
00
33
00
1308
10
00
00
1306
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
(4)
(5) (2)
(3)
33 00
01
1305
18 00
21
1120
00
10 00
1129
31
01
00
1132
36 00
05
1131
21 00
01
1128
05
01
00
1127
56 00
08
1138
29 00
01
1091
62 00
03
1092
00
14
09
1090
10
00
00
1088
24
00
00
1089
01
56 00
1080
97
04
00
1079
00
10 00
1031
76
01
00
779
07
65 00
780
03
13 00
775
00
20 00
1027
13 00
02
781
02
02
00
774
14 00
03
782
:
00
05
24 785
10 00
00
793
23 00
03
794
00
03
54 795
01
86 00
798
23
03
00
797
46
02
00
796
21 00
09
824
70
00
02
853
00
07
32 852
61
03
00
836
87
02
00
851
00
00
01
850
07
05
00
849
00
82
00
861
74
08
00
847 6245 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 11 , 2010 / भाद्र 20 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]
(5)
(4)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(4)
(3)
(5)
(1)
20
00
00
2224
00
01
05
Musakata
846
Baunshajala
02
02
00
2221
00
05
845
00
40
00
11
2213
00
20
00
882
10
00
00
2169
00
26
17
883
81
00
11
2212
00
01
30
884
60
00
00
2210
46
00
02
885
01
17
00
2211
62
00
01
886
60
00
2174
02 00
06
13
887
79
00
09
2176
00
10
00
1361
41
01
00
2175
01
80
00
91
98
00
13
1954
16
00
14
89
00
01
34
1951
00
91
02
1359
00
00
55
1953
33
00
05
88
16
00
03
1952
13
87
00
01
35
00
01
1950
83
00
02
1399
05
00
07
1947
74
00
02
2426
Baunshajala
01
53
00
1949
04
42
00
2425
00
29
00
1946
00
44
03
2420
67
00
01
1945
00
08
26
2418
00
05
03
1944
74
00
02
2419
98
00
04
1943
00
03
51
2331
00
58
00
1942
79
00
01
2300
13
00
01
1789
03
61
00
2310
33
00
06
1788
69
00
00
2311
65
00
1787
00
34
01
00
2308
26
00
1762
00
03
01
00
2312
00
10
00
1768
00
00
25
2307
50
00
03
1785
02
22
2306
00
00
33
00
1769
00
00
81
2305
00
04
29
1771
00
28
2280
00
10
00
00
1773
80
01
2304
00
44
01
00
1772
01
87
00
2303
54
05
1742
00
24
00
01
2302
00
26
00
1741
03
66
00
2286
99
02
00
1739
00
00
31
2288
15
00
04
1740
02
00
93
2295
00
13
00
1720
01
01
00
2294
03
82
00
1721
10
00
00
2293
92
01
00
1728
38
00
02
2291
65
00
00
1727
26
00
00
2289
00
10
00
1722
20
00
01
2290
17
00
00
1726
42
00
01
2218
82
00
02
1754
00
00
20
2510
14
00
03
1723
46
00
03
2225
31
01
00
1666
35
00
03
2220 6246
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2010/BHADRA 20 , 1932
[PART II SEC. 300i ) ] (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
( 5 ) 1754
00
02
82
Baunshajala
148
00
02
70
Baunshajala
2523
00
01
34
235
00
02
33 1635
00
01
95
00
116
13
71 1636
00
01
69
115
00
03
25 1634
00
01
41
2447
00
11
87 1633
00
02
24
74
00
05
12 1632
00
00
10
75
00
07
06 919
00
05
90
00
72
59
66 893
00
00
57
32
00
04
04 920
00
04
30
29
00
06
82 921
00
02
04
28
00
16
02 914
00
00
70
23
00
09
36 933
00
08
72
00
27
00 932
00
00
24
24
00
10
73 938
00
01
99
2559
00
00
32 937
00
02
66
21
00
00
18 936
00
01
17
22
00
71 942
00
03
69
2558
00
05 304
00
05
09
58
00
35
07 00
303
00
96
Erandibahal 117
00
04
89 305
00
00
38
115
00
16
88 306
00
02
13
114
00
02
12 302
00
01
12
113
00
27
89 322
00
02
28
101
00
08
30 301
00
01
30
99
00
15
06 323
00
00
25'
98
00
17
82 300
00
03
79
97
00
52
33 290
00
00
46
Charamal
1483
14
50
00
299
00
00
57
Keutibahal 354
00
75
57 292
00
01
61
353
00
17
54 293
00
02
73
404
00
30
08 291
00
02
352
00
02
51 269
00
00
10
366
00
13
02 264
00
04
02
351
00
24
29 266
00
00
93
504
00
97
39
Mugapala
00
265
04
40
498
00
00
97 274
00
00
16
497
00
22
07 259
00
05
61
496
00
00
20 260
00
00
66
444
00
00
20 257
00
00
43
494
00
04
22 256
00
04
91
434
00
12
51 227
00
04
64
166
01
03
46 232
00
00
39
167
00
70
20 229
00
02
04
162
01
06
30 230
00
01
23
519
00
08
37 6247 भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 11 , 2010/भाद्र 20, 1932
:
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(4)
(5)
(2)
(3)
(5) (3)
(2)
(4)
(1)
(1)
00
02
41
518
00
45
13
Muchibahala 1203
Mugapala
00
45
1197
00
39
98 66
152
35
1187
00
96 00
30
92
141
06
1186
10
00
00
01
48
150
00
02
58
1198
64
00
00
148
1185
86
00
11
76
20
00
147
1158
40
03
00
70
00
01
93
00
53
1157
02
00
52
36 00
81
1154
09
94
00
00
1149
25
42
00
08
95
00
1148
00
72
20
16
00
47
00
80
12
1147
00
00
10
42
878
00
17
05
76
01
00
43
00
904
11
19 m
75
03
44
71
00
01
905
901
00
05
97
55
00
36
17
906
00
10
00
85
00
13
18
907
00
03
58
76
18
22
00
56
908
04
00
00
67
51
132
Kulhiabahal
00
952
00
03 131
00
12
14
88
951
00
06 65
15
00
00 121
40
949
00
956
00
18
10
00
02
118
00
986
32
86 00
37
95
00
984
75
36 00
05
47
145
Ambadar
167
00
61
05
82
00
12
144
67
157
00
20 07
02
143
155
?5
00
42
16
196
00
16
71 141
145
06
00
65
36
00
81
19
00
05
01
144
99
138
14
143
00
(5)
29
00
00
139
71
01
141
00
21
136
00
10
271
00
02
33 00
58
137
00
265
08
276
75 00
01
05
132
00
23
00
278
00
10 00
11
66
130
00
279
05
25 00
04
129
73
299
74
00
01 00
01
77
85
00
300
15
65
17
00
76
22
30
293
00
00
25
00
74
10
00
00
298
39
00
00
296
00
10 00
15
87
01
311
00
99 75
00
65
210
Lambakheta
309
00
73
02 00
162
04
29
23
95
310
00
00
10
00
209
05
95
00
792
Satyanandapali
00
61
69
161
14
00
01
Alias Gaelchara 1131
41
47
136
00
04
788
00
38 00
35
40
61
[F. No. R - 25011 / 35 /2010 - OR - 1 ] 00
01
72
48
B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .
6248
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
1 नई दिल्ली , 9 सितम्बर , 2010
बुडाकटा का.आ. 2326.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप - सम्बलपुर - रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन " बिछाई जानी चाहिये;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि , जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री सुकान्त कुमार प्रधान , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप- सम्बलपुर - रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 1295 , फॉरेस्ट पार्क , भुवनेश्वर -751009 ( उड़ीसा ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य- उड़ीसा
तहसील - राजगांगपुर जिला - सुंदरगड
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
प्लाट सं.
4
2
5 3
26 1520 00
10
86
20
1516 00
10 1518 00
00
00
00
85 1515
00
65 1443
03
44 00
36
1442
00
10 1431 00
52 1432 00
04
10 00
00
1433
13
95 00
1434
08
02
1414 00
01
1413 00
83 00
55
03
1393
10
00
60 1392
00
94
02
1384
00
00
1378
10 00
35
1385
54 00
01
1356
07
58 1354 00
75 1353 00
02
00
03
97 1352
00
07
50 1351
00
1350 00
10
61 1348 00
02
05
43 1342 00
00
10
45 1341
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टयर एयर
4
2
3
5
1
36 565 00
09
बुडाकटा
00
51
566
11
60
05
1533 00
06
1530 00
08
97
21
1534 00
00
12 1536 00
19
47 1535 00
00
10 1549 00
49
02
1523 00
40 1522 00
01
00
1554 00
10
10
1521 00
97
06
33 1340 00
01
89 1343 00
00
77 1338
08
00
1337
05
21 00
10
29 1335
00
01
42 1336
00
17
02
962
00
05
65 900
65 00
09
904
905 00
00
95 906
00
14
82
74 907
00
16
908
18
06
00
05
99 912 00
00
29 911
03 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
1
3
4
2
5
1
00
909
01
00
बुडाकटा
नकटिसान 910 00
14
68
नकटिसान
109 00
00
11
00
113
11
55
00
114
00
88
00
123
12
58
00
06
124
27
126
00
12
13
127
00
01
54
00
00
121
10
103
00
04
39
00
131
07
74
133
00
01
62
00
08
132
12
142
00
02
23
141
00
00
37
00
144
02
55
143
00
05
52
00
150
02
90
151 00
05
86
533
00
00
14
152 00
03
71
172
00
04
28
173
00
98
02
00
538
00
169
00
09
41
168 00
00
29
00
171
02
36
170
00
तेलिघणा
03
80
537
00
01
76
00
04
167
87
00
165
01
79
513
00
00
14
13
217
00
36
219
00
06
21
220
00
07
46
00
221 00
83
01
89
233 00
00
234
03
04
16
232
00
08
3484 G5 / 10-14
6249 2
4
3
5
00
236
00
10 00
302
08
46 230
00
00
20 229
00
01
13 303
00
12
91 306
00
00
10 00
09 304
10
00
305
09
08 346
00
10
07 00
00
348
22 350
00
10
35 00
04
349
61 340
00
02
09 353
00
11
02 00
354
10
57 355
17
00
37 367
00
00
58 368
00
10
06 369
00
01
56 00
330
19
46 329
00
05
42 00
08
327
38 324
00
27
40 325
00
00
62 00
531
05
74 326
00
30
56 00
450
33
49 454
17
00
18 1627 00
00
10
05
1628 00
1629 00
83 1630 00
00 1657 00
00
05
1658
3 1659 00
04
02
18
1660 00
92 1661
10
00
11
08
1662 00
83
00
1705 00
24 00
1663
07
43 6250
[ PART 11 SIC 3 ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
4
5 2
3
1
03
1704 00
नेलिघणा
17
कुत्रा
00
03
35 1703
76
00
04
1700
05
40
00
1699
10
1698 00
29
00
41 1697 00
00
50 1693 00
02
89 1824 00
22 1692 00
10
00
19
07
1691
07
1720 00
44 1690 00
06
29 1721 00
02
03
91 1687 00
16
27 1689 00
04
41 1682 00
00
10 1723 00
05
39 1246 00
00
1247 00
10
69 1243 00
22
03
19 1242 00
00
1966 00
10 कुत्रा
1965 00
09
50
32
04
1964 00
52 1961 00
10
19
68 1963 00
01
50 1948 00
05
64 1944 00
32
1943 00
1938 00
13
46
17
1939 00
2215 00
63
02
19
04 1998 00
20 1999 00
07
18 3299 00
00
48 2001 00
OC
05
25 2002
87 2059 00
2208 00
4
2
3
00
24
2209
A
2211 00
00
2210
28
15
2334
00
2338
18
00
10 2336 00
00
2337
2358 00
01
00
00
2360
09
2362 00
00
23
2361
17
2507 00
3
01
(X)
2505
2506 00
(X)
2499
33 00
01
06
2487 00
ין
00
2482
00
2481
1.1
2477 00
00
12
2478
10
00
2479 00
27
2474 ( X)
S
42
2618 00
00
08
2633
(A)
2625
83
00
2632 00
04
18
03
(8 2631 00
2630 00
02
2629
רו
2628
(X)
2627
(X)
رار 2637
2397
88
01
18 2733 ( ۲)
17 2734
58 2742 (X)
07
19
00
2741
87 00
2740
15
그
2737 10
09
33 2856
32 (X)
2858
10 भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग 11 खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
1
5
2
3
1
04
कुत्रा
09
00
3309
कुत्रा
87
05
00
2857
35
04
2862 00
93
02
00
3308
04
10
2854 00
98
लिटिबेडा
06
00
2853
39
00
2875 00
03
2878 00
65
10
2877 00
97
11
2960 00
24
14
2874 00
17
18
2961 00
19
05
3053 00
40
04
00
3050
10
00
3048 00
14
13
3046 00
00
10
3043 00
14
09
3042 00
42
09
3040 00
02
02
3038 00
79
04
3039 00
60
00
3036 00
50
04
3031 00
78
14
00
44 3025 00
48
11
3020 00
66
19
3019 00
51
15
2988 00
96
01
2991 00
10
02
2990 00
93
01
2989 00
26
05
3122 00
44
04
3121 00
32
01
3120 00
कटंग
31
01
3123 00
05
13
3124 00
55
00
00
3215
05
18
3126 00
58
11
3127 00
17
11
3205 00
10
00
3128 00
6251
5
4
3
2
62
03
00
3113
39 00
00
3111
44
09
00
3110
02
14
00
3109
67
02
00
3108
97
01
00
1007
79
42
1006 00
58
02
00
917
07
00
921
27
01
00
922
04 00
08
923
74
14
926 00
4)
14
00
927
08
16
00
930
00
07
00
988
01
82 984 00
31
00
00
981
33
10
00
980
74 00
00
979
62
05
00
978
71
01
00
1113
13
59 00
1056
96
26
00
1068
16
01
00
1067
12
02
00
1071
62
06
00
1063
14
03
1087 00
18
04
1147 03
17 CO
05
1088
23
02
00
1096
TI
05
1097 00
02
41
1099 OC
46
13
1102 00
88
12
00
1229
16
10
00
1230
58
12
1228 00
91
15
00
1227
49
21
00
1224
10
00
00
1233
26
08
00
1223 6252
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 कंटग
1222 00
00
39
कंटंग 1220 00
07
03
1219 00
12
86
1212 00
00
63
1213 00
07
04
1210 00
18
40
1239 00
15
85
1206 00
00
25
1240 00
07
22
1244 00
00
42
1242 00
00
45
1243 00
14
92
1245 00
01
29
1252 00
03
18
1247 00
03
19
1251 00
13
56
1250 00
02
78
1255 00
00
31
1256 00
02
32
1249 00
00
10
1257 00
05
25
1258 00
00
82
1260 00
13
54
1261 00
00
10
1262 00
रूमाबाहाल
08
48
1267 00
10
43
1265 00
00
10
1998 00
02
46
1270 00
00
35
1273 00
04
89
1272 00
07
13
1274 00
05
60
1275 00
00
81
05
1277 00
52
1278 00
01
55
1162 00
00
47
05
1155 00
19
1159 00
06
97
1158 00
02
32
1160 00
12
37
1150 00
13
24
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 1087 00
01
87 1322 00
08
36 1321 00
09
39 1337 00
08
63 1338 00
15
94 1315 00
10
31 1420 00
04
53 1421 00
04
18 1423 00
23
82 1426 00
12
16 1428 00
16
25 1427 00
01
1483 00
76
86 1478 00
03
52 1477 00
20
67 00
1475
07
70 1476 00
04
45 1471 00
13
51 1472 00
02
50 1932 00
08
39 1934 00
17
81 1935 00
18
09 1938 00
08
00 894
00
85
60 855
00
07
42 856
00
03
11 857
00
00
11 853
00
23
14 849 00
03
20 852
00
08
90 851
00
05
00 00
790
09
90 419
00
57
36 429
00
06
20 430
00
01
98 436 00
04
00 443
00
08
38 457
00
07
48 456
00
19
40 452
00
16
80 6253 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
1
3
4
2
2
3
4
5
5
1
00
00
642
06
डुडुकाबाहाल
00
00
467
रूमाबाहाल
10
00
01
32
641
451
00
03
89
00
04
723
57 00
468
02
63
00
82
724
02 469 00
00
31
00
725
00
03 730
00
11
53
41
721
00
13 00
470
08
09
00
854
12
98 471 00
42
09
852
00
10
40 00
728
11
09
1205
00
00
43 00
12
729
39
00
08
00
1206
717
00
03
22
00
851
11
02 04
716
00
19
01
00
1204
47 00
1075
01
14
00
850
06
21
06
1074 00
07
10
99
846
00
711
00
07
40
828 00
11
99 00
652
00
98
829
00
08
47 648
00
09
95
10
830
00
40 651
00
10
32
00
05
12
831
00
26
655
04
819
00
10
24 02
633 00
09
00
27
02
818
11
634 00
07
00
817
06
33 00
626
55
14
00
816
45
00
624
00
06
05
994 00
01
22 618 00
08
86
995
00
53
07 617
00
11
12
00
1009 00
10 614 00
00
60
1007 00
16
36 06
615 00
01
04
1008 00
01 605 00
75
02
1005 00
12
60 00
604
03
39
00
00
19
1010
86
600
00
04
1003 00
30
00 00
599
05
16
00
1004
12
95 07
598 00
89
1207 00
01
79 00
05
595
73
16
63
1012 00
00
05
00
594
1040 00
00
53 630
00
27
04
डुडुकाबाहाल
1013
00
10
00
00
06
33
631
78
1036 00
08 632
00
09
33
00
08
1037
63 00
649
00
11
05
00
19
1033
648
00
18
63
1218 00
05
49 643 00
90
11
17
1031 00
79 644 00
26
03
1071 00
84
15 6254
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
1
2
4
3
5
1149 00
09
87 डुडुकाबाहाल
1152 00
06
61
1151 00
06
15
1153 00
15
39
1154 00
06
37 तिलेइमाल
160
13
00
81
159
00
00
31
158 00
00
47
152
00
07
43
00
08
151
12
150
00
01
43
146 00
17
41
71
00
13
75
65
00
15
04
66
00
01
37
67
00
05
10
282
00
06
82
54
00
05
89
48
00
91
00
53
00
03
72
00
52
01
10
49
00
07
72
50
00
09
04
00
केसरामाल
1297
45
13
09
1296 00
21
1295 00
03
52
00
15
1294
86
1293 00
01
45
1424 00
26
02
1292 00
05
17
1288 00
01
59
1289 00
97
00
00
1290 00
10
1287 00
08
22
1276 00
00
68
186 00
04
36
187
00
09
92
189
00
12
85
00
190
19
58
180
00
02
75
[PART 11- SEC !
2
4
3
191
केसरामाल
00
00
37
00
20
26
192
00
210
04
00
211
16
217
00
00
00
218
00
00
219
291
00
01
324 30
10
328
00
09
1.1
329
00
00
335
00
10
04
)لا(
336
00
334 00
00
337 00
10
338
05
00
00
343
01
353
00
02
354 00
02
350
00
06
349
00
346 00
05
00
00
348
(01
347
00
30
13
00
1110
03
1109 (0)
03
1106 00
04
1113 00
03
1103 00
05
95
1101 00
00
1102 00
09
20
1056 00
01
58
00
1058
01
28
00
1057
02
54
1059 00
08
07
1095
84
00
11
1093 (0)
13
(X)
57
1085 00
01
00
1086
06
39
1087 00
08
15 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
5
4
राइजेर्णा
00
00
10
1089
कसरामाल
14
01
1090 00
06
06
00
1081
55
07
00
1082
23
07
00
1
झगरपुर
72
04
00
12
48
14
00
13
11
16
00
10
80
00
00
9
96
03
00
8
60
22
00
2
81
01
00
3
73
05
00
1746
98
00
1747 00
35
21
1767 00
10
10
00
1770
95
05
1771 00
53
06
100
1769
59
15
1781
21
10
(X)
1780
56 1733
45
14
1720
80
00
1722 00
83
01
00
1709
26
04
90
00
00
1946
59
20
1608 00
42
03
1609 00
25
28
00
1610
75
07
1611 00
34
10
00
1626
88
23
1625 00
06
1622 00
14
05
2095 00
46
05
1621 00
10
00
00
1663
23
09
1659 00
95
02
00
1629
28
01
00
1658
52
06
00
1630
6255
5
4
3
2
40
06
00
1657
06
51 00
1656
33
04
00
1633
96
01
00
1632
88
07
00
1514
01
21
00
1516
28
09
00
1507
52
10
00
1505
52
00
00
1506
12 00
02
1497
12
06
00
1496
42
04
00
1495
45
12
00
1485
61
06
00
1486
83
05
2141 00
10
00
00
1484
53
03
00
1480
05
06
00
1479
08
00
1-478
2)
14
00
1476
04
00
1477
16 00
1-466
89
05
00
1474
20
10
1471
94 1472
00
1441
00
10
1415
23
00
(0)
1417
00
01
1414
58
00
00
1302
03
1303 00
30
07
00
1306
98
13
00
1305
92
08
00
1295
18
02
00
1294
11
09
00
1247
85
18
00
1249
09
03
00
1248
36
03
00
1257
19
20
00
1256
63
13
00
1125 6256
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 राइबेर्णा
1128 00
00
32
राइबेर्णा 1124 00
00
17 1120 00
00
87 1126 00
03
61
1127 00
05
04 1119 00
13
92 1118 00
22
14
00
1116
11
92
लाइंग 1115 00
01
70
02
93
1112 00
06
59
08
93
1106 00
09
14
1107 00
ΟΙ
26
1105 00
05
24
1102 00
13
66
16
48
1091 00
23
63
1080 00
00
85
1090 00
19
71
1081 00
05
89
1087 00
06
38
1083 00
08
48
1084 00
16
52
1068 00
15
68
1937 00
14
12
1035 00
00
10
1031 00
08
17
2077 00
01
56
1032 00
02
02
1033 00
04
21
2129 00
03
88
00
2128 00
21
1029 00
19
90
1026 00
00
96
1025 00
04
93
2125 00
02
11
1024 00
00
20
1019 00
18
15
1023 00
02
03
1020 00
00
10
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5 2124
00
00
15 1018 00
06
32 976
00
00
63 1017 00
14
23 977 00
00
10 979
00
01
12 978
00
04
17 859
00
05
13 858
00
06
19 857
00
08
74 856
00
03
54 861
00
00
94 862
00
12
84 863
00
00
10 870
00
01
76 869
00
19
04 1133 00
11
58 1132
00
00
53 1137 00
06
16 1139 00
02
16 1138 00
04
47 1214 00
07
10 1213 00
02
50 1211 00
01
25 1210 00
04
21 1209 00
05
58 1208 00
06
79 1207 00
16
96 1250 00
05
79 1249 00
00
10 1252 00
36
72 1253 00
05
91 1254 00
20
89 1255 00
04
48 1184 00
01
17 1256 00
23
08 1262 00
15
07 1311 00
01
73 1312 00
01
70 1313 00
05
00 3117 00
01
35 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
{ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
1
3
2
1
6257
4
5 3
2
47 00
19
1535
Budhakta
27
00
04
3118
28
00
68
3145
20
40
00
3146
37
07
00
3181
89
24
00
3149
[सं.आर-25011/36/2010- ओ.आर-1 ]
बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 9th September, 2010
S.O. 2326. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) & Ranchi ( Jharkhand) , a "Paradip- Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the . Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in theGazette of India, are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Sukanta Kumar Pradhan, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip - Sambalpur- Raipur- Ranchi Pipeline Project , 1295 , Forest Park , Bhubaneswar - 751009, (Orissa).
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: Rajgangapur District :Sundergarh State : Orissa
Area
Name ofthe
PlotNo.
Are Sq . Mtr .
Hectare
Village
4
5
3
2
1
09
00
565
Budhakta
51
11
00
566
60
05
00
1533
08
06
00
1530
97
21
00
1534
12
00
00
1536
348497/10-15
00
10 1549
00
49
02
00
1523
40
01
00
1522
00
10 00
1554
97
10
00
1521
26
10
00
1520
86
20
00
1516
00
10 00
1518
85 00
00
1515
65
03
00
1443
44 00
36
1442
00
10
00
1431
52 00
04
1432
10 00
00
1433
95
13
00
1434
08
02
1414
00
83
01
00
1413
03
55 00
1393
60
10
00
1392
94
02
00
1384
10
00
00
1378
54
35
00
1385
00
01
77 1356
07
58 00
1354
75 00
02
1353
97 00
03
1352
50 00
07
1351
10 00
00
1350
61
02
00
1348
43
05
00
1342
45 00
1341
کیا
33 00
1340
00
10
1343
08
1338
00
21
05
00
1337
29
10
00
1335
42
01
00
1336
17 00
2
962
65
05
00
900
65
09
00
904 6258
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
Budhakta
00
905
00
95
Naktisan 906
00
14
82
907
00
16
74
908
00
06
18
912
00
05
99
911
00
03
29
909
00
01
00
00
910
14
68
Naktisan
100
00
00
11
113
00
11
55
114
00
00
88
123
00
12
58
124
00
06
27
00
126
12
13
127
00
01
54
121
00
00
10
103
00
04
39
131
00
07
74
133
00
01
62
132
00
08
12
142
00
02
23
141
00
00
37
144
00
02
55
143
00
05
52
150
00
02
90
151
00
05
86
533
00
00
14
152
00
03
71
172
00
04
28
173
02
00
98
538
00
00
Π
169
00
41
09
168
00
00
29
171
00
02
36
Telighana 170
00
03
80
537
00
01
75
00
167
04
87
165
00
79
513
00
00
14
217
00
13
36
219
00
06
21
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2
4
3
5 220
00
07
46 221
00
00
83 223
00
89 234
00
03
04 232
00
16
08 236
00
00
10 302
00
OS
46 230
00
00
20 229
00
01
13 00
303
12
91 306
00
00
10 304
00
10
09 305
00
09
08 346
00
10
07 348
00
00
22 350
00
10
35 349
00
04
61 340
00
02
09 353
00
11
02 354
00
10
57 355
00
17
37 367
00
00
58 368
00
10
06 369
00
01
56 330
00
19
46 329
00
05
42 327
00
08
38 324
00
27
40 325
00
62
00
00
531
05
74 326
00
30
56 450
00
33
49 454
00
17
18 1627
00
00
10 1628
00
05
48 1629
00
83 1630
00
02
m 1657
00
13
26 1658
00
05
43 1659
00
04
02 1660
00
18
92 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
5
2
3
1 1
00
10
11 1661
Kutra Telighana
83
00
08
1662
24 1705
00
00
00
43
07
1663
00
17 1704
03
35
00
03
1703
76
00
04
1700
1699
00
05
40
00
29 1698
10
41
00
00
1697
00
00
20 1693
00
02
39 1824
22
00
10
1692
00
07
19 1691
07
1720
00
77
00
06
44 1690
1721
00
02
29
91 1687
00
03
00
16
27 1689
41
04
1682
00
00
00
10 1723
00
05
39 1246
10
00
1247
00
00
22
69 1243
00
19
03
1242
10
00
00
1966
Kutra
50
00
09
1965
32
04
1964 00
00
10
52 1961
68
19
00
1963
50
01
00
1948
64
05
00
1944
32
19
00
1943
46
13
1938
00
19
17
1939
00
63
00
02
2215
19
04
00
1998
07
20
00
1999
48
00
00
3299
46
13
00
2000
28
05
00
2001
6259
5
4
3
2
25
05
00
2002
01
87 00
2059
09 00
03
2208
24
13 00
2209
91
00
00
2211
29 00
28
2210
27
15
00
2334
92
18
00
2338
10
00
00
2336
03
25 00
2337
22 00
2358
00
45 00
2360
86 00
09
2362
23
49 00
2361
17
22 00
2507
43 00
01
2505
09
52 00
2506
00
01
33 2499
73 2487
00
06
12
49 00
2482
00
30 00
2481
00
14
2477
46
27
12
00
2478
10
00
2479 00
97
27
2474 00
58
42
00
2618
63
08
2633
00
83
00
2625
00
48
04
2632
00
68 2631
00
03
02
97 00
2630
04
48 00
2629
54
12
00
2628
97
05
2627
00
10
00
2637
00
01
00
88 2397
18 00
04
2733
17
01
2734
00
58
02
2742
00
97
19
00
2741
00
87
03
2740
15
22
00
2737 6260
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
2
1
3
4
5
1 Kutra
2856
09
00
33
Kutra 2858
00
32
10
00
09
04
3309
2857
00
05
87
00
2862
04
35
00
3308
02
93
00
2854
10
04
2853
00
06
98
Litibeda
00
00
2875
39
2878
00
03
39
10
2877
00
65
2960
00
97
11
2874
00
14
24
2961
00
18
17
05
19
3053 00
04
3050
00
40
00
3048
00
10
00
3046
13
14
00
00
3043
10
3042
00
09
14
42
3040
00
09
00
3038
02
02
00
3039
04
79
3036
00
00
60
00
04
3031
50
14
78
00
00
3025
44
00
48
3020
11
00
19
66
3019
2988
00
15
51
00
2991
01
96
00
10
2990
02
2989
00
01
93
26
3122
05
00
00
04
44
3121
3120
01
00
32
Katanga
01
00
31
3123
3124
00
05
13
00
00
55
3215
00
3126
05
18
58
3127
00
11
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
4
3
5 2
11
17 00
3205
00
00
3128
10 00
62 3113
03
39 00
00
3111
44 3110
00
09
00
14
02 3109
00
3108
02
67 00
97 1007
01
42
79 1006 00
917
00
58
02
00
07
921
55 00
27 922
01
08
04 923
00
00
14
74 926
00
14
927
40 930
00
16
08
00 988
00
07
00
984
01
82
00
981
00
31 980
00
10
33
00
979
00
74
05
978
00
62 00
01
71 1113
1056
00
59
13
00
26
96 1068
1067 00
01
16 00
02
12 1071
00
62 1063
06
00
1087
03
14 1147
00
04
18 1088
00
05
17 00
1096
02
23 00
05
77 1097
00
41
02 1099
46 1102 00
13
12
00
1229
88 00
10
16 1230
1228
00
12
58
15
1227
00
91
21
00
49 1224
00
1233
00
10 6261
ÖGAॉसितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
4
5 3
2
24
13
00
1150
Katanga
26
08
00
1223
Katanga
39
00
00
1222
03
07
00
1220
86
00
12
1219
63
00
00
1212
04
07
00
1213
40
18
00
1210
85
15
00
1239
25
00
00
1206
22
07
00
1240
42
00
00
1244
45
00
00
1242
92
14
00
1243
29
01
00
1245
18
03
00
1252
19
03
00
1247
56
00
13
1251
78
02
00
1250
31
00
00
1255
32
02
00
1256
10
00
00
1249
25
05
00
1257
82
00
00
1258
54
00
13
1260
87
01
00
1087
36
08
00
1322
39
09
00
1321
63
08
00
1337
94
15
00
1338
31
10
00
1315
53
04
00
1420
18
04
00
1421
82
23
00
1423
16
12
00
1426
25
16
00
1428
01
00
1427
86
76
00
1483
52
03
00
1478
67
20
00
1477
70
07
00
1475
45 00
04
1476
51 00
13
1471
50 00
02
1472
39
08
00
1932
81
17
00
1934
09 00
18
1935
00
08
00
1938
85
60 00
894
Rumabahal
00
10
00
1261
48
08
00
1262
43
10
00
1267
10
00
00
1265
46
02
00
1998
35
00
00
1270
89
00
04
1273
07
13
00
1272
60
05
00
1274
00
91
00
1275
52
05
00
1277
55
01
00
1278
47
00
00
1162
19
05
00
1155
97
06
00
1159
32
02
00
1158
37
00
12
1160
42
07
00
855
11 00
03
856
11
00
00
857
14
23
00
853
20
03
00
849
90
08
00
852
00
05
00
851
90
09
00
790
36
57
00
419
20
06
00
429
98
01
00
430
00
04
00
436
38
08
00
443
48
07
00
457
40
19
00
456
80
00
16
452 6262
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[ PART II SEC. 3 ( ⅱ ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
4
3
5 Rumabahal
467
00
00
10
641
00
01
32
Dudukabahal
451
00
03
89
00
723
04
57 00
468
02
63
724
00
02
82 469
00
00
31
725
00
03
00 730
00
11
53
721
00
13
41 470
00
08
09
854
00
12
98 471
00
09
42
852
00
10
40 728
00
11
09
1205
00
00
43 729
00
12
39
1206
00
08
00 717
03
00
22
00
851
11
02 716
00
04
19
00
1204
01
47 00
1075
01
14
850
00
06
21 00
07
06
1074
846
00
10
99 711
00
07
40
828
00
99
11 652
00
00
98
829
00
08
47 00
09
648
95
830
00
10
40 651
00
10
32
00
831
05
12 655
00
04
26
819
00
24
10 00
633
02
09
818
00
02
27 634
00
07
11
817
00
06
33 626
00
14
55
816
00
00
45 624
00
06
05
994
00
01
22 618
00
08
86
995
00
07
53 617
00
12
11
1009 00
00
10 614
00
00
60
1007
00
16
36 615
00
06
01
1008
00
04
01 605
00
02
75
1005
00
12
60 604
00
03
39
1010
00
00
19 600
00
86
04
1003
00
00
30 599
00
05
16
1004
00
12
95 598
00
07
89
1207
00
01
79 595
00
05
73
1012
00
16
63 594
00
05
00
1040
00
00
53 00
Dudukabahal
630
27
04
1013
00
00
10 06
631
00
33
00
1036
08
78 632
00
09
33
1037
00
08
63 649
00
00
11
1033
00
05
19 648
00
18
63
1218
05
00
49 643
00
11
90
1031
00
17
79 00
644
03
26
00
1071
15
84 642
00
06
00
1149
00
09
87 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
4
2
3
1 1
61
00
05
1152
6263
4
5 2
3
39
04
00
210
Keshramal
Dudukabahal
06
15
00
1151
39
00
15
1153
37
00
06
1154
81
160
00
13
Tileimal
00
00
159
31
47
00
158
00
07
00
43
152
12
00
08
151
43
00
01
150
41
17
00
146
75
71
00
13
04
00
65
15
01
00
37
66
00
05
10
67
82
00
06
282
89
05
00
54
00
91
00
48
72
00 03
53
10
00
01
32
07
72
00
49
04
(9
50
00
45
13
00
1297
Keshramal
21
00
09
1296
03
52
00
1295
15
86
00
1294
45
00
01
1293
26
00
02
1424
17
00
05
1292
59
00
01
1288
00
97
00
1289
10
00
00
1290
22
08
00
1287
68
00
00
1276
36
00
04
186
09
92
00
187
85
00
12
189
19
58
190
00
75
00
02
180
37
00
00
191
36
00
20
192
00
32
16
211
13
00
00
217
21 00
218
01
00
35 00
219
16
01
00
291
00
10
62 324
00
09
54 328
00
00
44 329
10
00
51 335
66
04
336
00
00
334
00
69
14 00
10
337
05
00
338
90 .
57 00
01
343
63 00
02
353
00
02
90 354
06
97 00
350
89 00
349
05
346
00
00
56 348
00
01
00
13
30 347
03
00
96 1110
91 00
03
1109
04
1106
00
03
1113
05
00
95 1103
00
59 1101
00
26 00
09
1102
00
58
01
1056
28
01
00
1058
54 00
02
1057
07
08
00
1059
84 00
11
1095
00 00
13
1093
01
57 00
1085
06
39 00
1086
15
08
00
1087
00
10
00
1089
74
01
00
1090
06
06
00
1081
07
55 00
1082 6264
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
4
5
2
3
1
1
07
1
00
23
Raiberna Jhagarpur
00
04
12
72
00
48
13
14
00
10
16
11
9
00
00
80
00
8
03
96
2
00
22
60
00
3
81
01
05
00
Raiberna
73
1746
00
00
98
1747
00
21
1767
35
00
1770
10
10
95
00
05
1771
00
06
53
1769
00
15
59
1781
21
00
10
1780
00
01
66
1733
1720
00
14
45
00
00
80
1722
00
01
1709
83
26
1601
00
04
00
90
1946
00
00
20
59
1608
42
1609
00
03
1610 00
28
25
75
07
1611 00
00
10
34
1626
00
23
1625
88
06
00
77
1622
00
05
14
2095
00
05
46
1621
00
00
10
1663
23
09
1659
00
1629
00
02
95
1658
00
01
28
00
06
52
1630
00
06
40
1657
1656
00
06
51
04
33
1633 00
1632
00
01
96
07
00
1514
88
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2
4
3
5
21
1516 00
01 00
09
28 1507
1505
00
10
52
00
00
52 1506
00
02
12 1497
00
06
1496
12 00
04
42 1495
00
12
1485
45 1486
00
06
61 00
2141
05
83
10 1484
00
00
1480
00
03
53 1479
00
06
05 00
08
1478
44 00
04
1476
29
27 1477
04
00
00
04
16 1466
00
05
89 1474
20 00
1471
10
02
1472
00
94 00
02
08 1441
00
1415
10
91
00
23 1417
00
00
01
44 1414
00
00
58 1302
00
03
15 1303
00
07
1306
30 00
13
98 1305
00
08
92 1295
00
02
1294
18
09
00
1247
85 1249
00
18
1248
00
03
09 00
1257
03
36 1256
00
20
19 00
1125
63
13
00
00
1128
32
00
17 1124
00
00
00
87 1120
00
03
1126
61 00
04 1127
05 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2
3
5
4
1
1
00
92
13
Raiberna
1119
6265
4
5 2
3
00
10 00
Raiberna
14
1118 00
22
00
92
1116
11
00
70
01
1115
Laing
93
1111
00
02
06
1112
00
59
00
08
93
1110
09
14
1106
00
00
01
26
1107
00
24
05
1105
00
66
1102
13
48
00
16
1101
63
23
1091 00
85
1080
00
00
71
00
19
1090
89
00
05
1081
00
06
38
1087
00
08
48
1083
00
16
52
1084
68
1068
00
15
14
12
1937 00
00
00
10
1035
00
08
17
1031
00
01
56
2077
02
02
1032 00
21
04
1033
00
2129
00
03
88
00
00
21
2128
00
90
19
1029
00
%
1026
00
04
00
93
1025
2125
11
00
02
00
00
20
1024
18
15
1019 00
03
00
02
1023
00
10
1020
00
00
15
00
2124
06
32
1018
00
63
00
00
976
23
1017
00
14
977
01
12 979
00
04
00
17 978
00
05
859
13
19 00
858
06
74
08
857
00
856
03
54 00
00
00
94 861
00
84
12
862
00
00
10 863
01
76 870
00
00
04 869
19
58
11
1133
00
53 00
00
1132
06
16 1137
00
16 00
02
1139
00
47 1138
04
00
10 1214
07
00
1213
02
50
01
25 00
1211
21 1210
00
04
05
58 00
1209
79 00
06
1208
96
16
1207
00
79 00
05
1250
10
00
1249
00
00
36
72 1252
05
91 00
1253
89 1254
20
00
04
48 00
1255
00
01
17 1184
08
23
1256
00
07
15
1262
00
00
01
73 1311
70 00
1312
00 00
1313
00
وز 3117
00
04
3118
28
68
3145
00
20 00
40
3146
00
07
37 3181
89
24
3149
00
[No. R - 25011 /36/ 2010 - OR - I ] B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .
6266
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1927
...
4
3
2
1
नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर , 2010
758
00
1. पलाड़ी खुर्द
00
00
760
759
00
735/5
(X)
01
00
736
का.आ. 2327.केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह उगवश्यक प्रतात होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप- सम्बलपुर- रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन " बिछाई जानी चाहिये;
(0)
739/2 00
00
737
(
00
738
04
00
739:!
(0)
00
717/1
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि , जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
07
718/4 00
(15
00
756/1,476/3,478
00
682
00
00
687
00
681
03 अत . अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
00
676
652
00
18
03
662
00
02
00
661
660
00
11
(X)
14
657
01
576
कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जन साधारण को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री दिलीप कुमार अग्रवाल , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप सम्बलपुर - रायपुर - राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना , एन -17 , सेक्टर 2 , अवंति विहार, रायपुर -492006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
580,582,583.596.597 , 598,599,603,584,583. 593,594,595,573 . 506/1,578.579,590,591
00
577
अनुसूची
08
586?
जिला-जांजगीर- चाम्पा गज्य -छत्तीसगढ़
तहसील सक्ती
5873
(0)
83 क्षेत्रफल
खसरा सं.
क्रम गांव का नाम
5872
(X)
34 हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
सं.
26
587/1 00 4
15
6
5
588
2
3
00 1
01
ここ
821/3 00
2. पलाडी कला
24
1406/1 00
18
1. पलाड़ी खुर्द
12
01
711/3
1406/2
10
00
(1 )
436
17
1405/3 00
17
(k)
LRI
438
8
794
00
439
27
()
00
777
(५
4: 3
78
776/2 00
23
06
1491
83
776/1 00
01
-127
48
774
00
107
11
441
10
786/1 00
17
00
442
69
03
788
W
11
426
00
55
05
787
25
409/1
19
789
60
409/2
01
02
773/1
10
03
83
409/3
04
06
792
92
103
00
408
54
790
01
07
78
294
81
08
765 6267 भारत का राजपत्र : सिनम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग - खण्ड ( ii) ]
6
5
3
2
1
6
5
4
3
2
1
10
00
00
414
4.
भागोडीह
31
00
00
293
2. पलाडी कला
95
08
00
192
99
00
00
288/4
84
10
00
189
64
00
00
292
53
01
00
188
08
13
00
288/3
07
09
00
186
61
03
00
291
09
00
185
12
00
200
35
12
00
4
00
00
289/1
10
00
00
3
10
06
00
289/2
42
00
2
6
01
00
46
10 3. मुक्ता-राजा
00
00
00
00
47
58
01
00
1017
5.
सरह
01
00
49
20
15
00
1038
00
00
48
25
08
00
1039
16
00
53
57
05
00
1044
16
18
00
57
80
19
00
1040
55
04
00
59
55
26
00
1041
53
08
00
58
66
04
00
1016
75
07
00
60
16
08
00
965
25
07
00
61
49
51
00
966
24
18
00
62
49
12
00
953
98
00
00
63
01
22
00
969
19
04
00
92
60
16
00
970
33
03
00
91
84
00
971
20
71
06
00
66
39
04
00
944
12
07
00
67
57
01
00
972
83
08
00
ون
75
14
00
973
89
15
00
88
62
09
00
974
72
08
00
76
43
17
00
935
81
01
00
75
54
01
00
936
10
18
00
60
05
00
923
37
07
00
144
64
03
00
937
18
09
00
147
18
07
00
922
71
00
00
146
76
34
00
151
91
10
00
148
14
00
152
00
10
00
00
150
92
22
00
147: 1
18
03
00
149
38
03
147/2 00
86
04
00
212
4. भागोडीह
42
40
00
159
90
02
00
243
17
06
00
162
91
03
00
213
76
03
00
165
02
08
00
214
47
83
00
166
29
00
00
215
12
21
00
168
91
32
00
216
81
00
00
167
68
06
00
217
36
14
00
177
67
06
00
198
85
05
00
175
63
01
00
197
79
00
00
176
14
15
00
196
06
33
00
119
27
13
00
191
94
03
00
506
6. जवें
10
00
00
193 6268
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010. BHADRA 27, 1932
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 1
2
3
4
5
6
New Delhi , the 9th September , 2010 7.
गतवा
240
00
03
05
241
00
02
56
242
00
00
10
243
00
07
36
244
00
03
15
S.O. 2327. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) & Ranchi (Jharkhand ) , a "Paradip- Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
232
00
00
10
231
00
14
27
230
00
00
31
260
00
06
32
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification ;
261
00
28
39
223
00
07
50
268
00
09
21
269
00
01
53
270
00
06
11
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
211
00
23
48
212
00
00
10
213
00
30
17
54
00
40
89
41
00
00
40
45
00
06
21
42
00
24
66
28
00
14
03
27
00
00
41
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Dilip Kumar Agarwal , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip Sambalpur - Raipur- Ranchi Pipeline Project , N - 17 , Sector - 2 , Avanti Vihar , Raipur-492006 , Chhattisgarh.
25
00
16
96
SCHEDULE
24
00
12
12
30
00
02
State:
Tehsil : Sakti District : Janjgir- Champa
03
23
00
25
23
Chhattisgarh 22
00
05
12
Sr. Name of the Khasara
Area 17
00
22
88
No.
No. Village
Hectare Are Sq . Mtr .
502
00
8 . सुन्दरेली
06
54
1
2
3
4
5
6 497
00
02
66
1. Paladi Khurd 1406/1 00
18
24 498
00
20
13
1406/2 00
00
10 496
00
02
93
1405/3 00
480
11
17 00
15
95
794
00
486
00
04
15
88
18
00
484
777
00
05
00
60
27 485
00
05
776/2 00
00
01
78 487
00
16
776/1 00
54
03
83 474
00
03
774
22
00
08
48 463
00
00
92
786/1 00
00
10 459
00
08
98
788
00
03
69 458
00
03
04
787
00
03
55 455
00
14
29
789
00
02
19 457
00
00
25
773/1
00
01
02 454
00
00
32
792
00
03
04 456
00
09
55
790
00
01
54 449
00
01
92
765
00
08
81 448
00
03
18
758
00
01
20 [ सं. आर-25011/34/2010- ओ.आर -1 ]
760
00
00
35
759
00
बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव
06
29 6269 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
2
2
4
1
3
4
5
6
1
3
5
6 00
06
288/3 00 735/5
04
08
84 1. Paladi Khurd
2. Paladi Kala
00
01
67 736
88
291
00
03 739/2 00
09
38
290
00
12
12 00
00
46
00
68 737
289/1 00 00
738
289/2 00
06
06
10
22
00
739/1
04
10
46
00
01
96
3. Mukta - Raja
00
47
00
09
00
65 717/1
60
49
718/4 00
07
90
00
01
03
00
05
62
00
10
48
756/1,476/3,478 00
682
00
53
00
16
48
15
53
687
00
00
57
00
18
16
52
00
05
74
04
55 681
59
00 676
58
00
53 00
08
03
93
75
00 652
00
13
21
60
07 662
00
18
00
07
25
03
61
00
18
24
75
661
02
62
00 660
11
00
98 00
63
00
99
657
00
14
09
92
04
19
00 576
00
08
01
91
00
03
33
06
71
00
66
580,582,6583,596,597 ,
598,599,603,584,585 ,
67
00
07
12
09
96
593,594,595,573 , 00
69
00
08
83 506/1,578,579,590,591
89
00
15
88
00
20
577
83
76
00
08
72
08
586/2 00
93
81
00
75
01 587/3 00
01
83
00
18
10 00
10
587/2
34
144
00
07
37 00
587/1
08
26
147
00
09
18 00
01
588
15
146
00
00
71 821/3 00
04
33
2. Paladi Kala
00
91
148
10
20
12
711/3 01
00
150
00
10 436
00
54
02
00
149
03
18
06
17
438
00
212
00
86
04
4. Bhagodih
00
03
44
439
243
00
02
90
10
00
440/3 00
213
00
03
91
23
03
449/1 00
08
02
00
214
00
01
427
05
00
00
29
215
07
441
00
11
32
91
00
216
00
47
04
442
217
68
00
06 426
10
00
11
67
06
00
198
25
409/1 00
06
197
01
63
00
409/2 00
06
60
15
14
00
196
03
409/3 00
83
27
191
00
13 00
408
92
03
10
193
00
00
00
07
294
78
414
00
10
00
00
00
31
293
00
08
95
192
00
99
288/4 00
84
00
10
189
00
00
64
292
53
00
01
188 6270
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( 2
1
4
5
6
3
4
5 3
2
1
186
00
07
09
00
15 4. Bhagodih
244
03
7. Gatwa
185
00
09
92
10
00
232
00 4
00
35
12
2
00
14
231
00
3
00
10
31
00
230
00 2
00
00
42
06
260
00 1
00
00
10
30
00
28
261
5. Sarhar
00
01
58
1017
07
00
223
15
26
1038 00
09
00
に
268
00
08
1039
25
53
00
01
269
05
1044 00
57
270
00
11
19
1040
00
80
או
00
211
23 00
26
1041
55
00
212
00
66
04
1016
00
00
30
17
213
965
00
08
16
00
40
80
54
966
00
51
49
41
40
00
00 953
00
12
49
45
21
00
06
22
00
969
01
24
42
00 970
00
16
60
05
28
14
00 971
00
84
20
27
00
00 00
944
04
39
96
25
00
16
57
972
00
01
12
00
12
24
14
973
00
75
03
30
02
30 00
09
62
974
23
23
00
25 00
17
935
43
22
00
05 00
01
936
54
00
83
17
69
923
00
05
06
502
00
8. Sundreli
00
64
937
03
497
66
00
02
07
922
00
18
20
498
00
13 00
76
151
34
93
496
02
00
00
14
00
152
480
00
15
92
147/1 00
22
15
18
486
00
03
38
147/2 00
484
00
60
00
42
159
00
40
00
05
485
00 162
06
17
00
487
00
16
54 00
76
165
03
474
00
03
47
166
00
83
00
00
92
463
00
168
21
12
459
08
00
98
00
81
167
00
00
04
458
03
14
36
177
00
455
00
14
29 175
85
00
05
25
00
457
00
00
176
00
79
32
454
00
00
33
06
119
00
55
09
456
00
03
6. Jarwe
506
00
94
449
00
(01
03
240
00
7. Gatwa
05
18
448
03
00
02
56
241
00
[F. No. R- 25011 / 34 / 2010 - OR - 1 ] 00
242
00
10
B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .
00
36
07
243 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6271
= ===
नई दिल्ली , 9 सितम्बर , 2010
का.आ. 2328.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अनुसूची में यह उल्लिखित तारीखों की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त अधिनियम की 6 धारा की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में , जो सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त है , उपयोग का अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न का अधिकार इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में, निहित किया था ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह रिर्पोट दी है कि कर्नाटक राज्य में चेन्नै बेंगलुरु तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है । अतः उस भूमि में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की जाए जिसका संक्षिप्त विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट किया गया है । अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण -1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों के रूप में घोषित करती है ।
अनुसूची जिला : कोलार
तालुका
गांव का नाम
का.आ.सं. एवं तारीख
क्रम सं.
4
3
2
1
मुलबागल
कसबुगान्हल्लि
1281
1 .
मुलबागल
जयापल्ली
20-05-2008
मुलबागल
मुलबागल
मुलबागल
माइलापुरा
मुलबागल
काम्मासन्द्रा
मुलबागल
मुलबागल
चिक्कागुटटाहल्लि
मुलबागल
डोड्डागुट्ट्टाहल्लि
मुलबागल
कृष्णापुरा
मुलबागल
वज्रनागेनाहल्लि
मुलबागल
जाथमंगलाअग्रहरा
मुलबागल
डोम्मासन्ड्रा
मुलबागल
सगोंडाहल्लि
मुलबागल
कीलागाणी
मुलबागल
मेलागाणी
मुलबागल
पडाकास्ति
मुलबागल
कन्नथा
मुलबागल
कुरुबा चन्दुमनाहल्लि
मुलबागल
बल्लाअग्रहरा
मुलबागल
चन्नापुरा
राज्य : कर्नाटक राज्य
जिला
प्रचालन की समाप्ति कीतारीख
7
6
5
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कनोटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कनाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कोलार
60-04-2010 कनाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कालार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार 6272
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
2
3
4
येडाहल्लि
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5
6
7
मुलबागल
चित्थेरी
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
उरकुंटेमिट्टुरु
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
आवलमारक्कालागट्टा
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
मिणिजेनहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
बन्डहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
3345
चिक्कागुट्ट्टाहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
12-12-2008
सगोंडाहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
चन्नापुरा
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
उरकुंटेमिटुरु
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
मिणिजेनहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
येडाहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
1948
रामचन्द्रपुरा
कोलाए
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
15-07-2009
पडाकास्ति
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
चित्थेरी
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
बन्डहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
मिणिजेनहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
कसवुगान्हल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
912 29-03-2010
माइलापुरा
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
मुलबागल
पुल्लोबारेड्डीहल्लि
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
सगोंडाहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
पडाकास्ति
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
कुरुबा चन्दुमनाहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
चन्नापुरा
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
येडाहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
उरकुंटेमिदुरु
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
मिणिजेनहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
बन्डहल्लि
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010
मुलबागल
जयमंगला
बंगारपेट 1282 29-05-2008
बंगारपेट
नीलकण्ठपुरा
वादंडाहल्लि
बंगारपेट
कामण्डहल्ली
बंगारपेट
बंगारपेट
कंगानल्लुर
मावहल्लि
बंगारपेट
नायकरहल्लि
बंगारपेट
वटुकुंटे
बंगारपेट
बावरहल्लि
बंगारपेट
हुडकुला
बंगारपेट कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04-2010 6273
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
1
बंगारपेट
अनिगानाहल्लि
बंगारपेट
सिड्डानहल्लि
बंगारपेट
अक्षेत्रगोल्लाहल्लि
बंगारपेट
मुगालाबेले
बंगारपेट
माधमंगला
बंगारपेट
सूलकुंटे
बंगारपेट
जयमंगला
3346
2.
बंगारपेट 12-12-2008
कंगानल्लुर
बंगारपेट
कामण्डहल्ली
बंगारपेट
मावहल्लि
बंगारपेट
सिड्डानहल्लि
बंगारपेट
अक्षेत्रगोल्लाहल्लि
बंगारपेट
मुगालाबेले
बंगारपेट
सूलकुंटे
बंगारपेट
नीलकण्ठपुरा
बंगारपेट
मीठमल्लहल्ली
बंगारपेट
वांदडाहल्लि
1947
3.
बंगारपेट
मावहल्लि
15-07-2009
बंगारपेट
मुगालाबेले
बंगारपेट
वांदडाहल्लि
913
4.
बंगारपेट
कामण्डहल्ली
29-03-2010
बंगारपेट
मावहल्लि
बंगारपेट
नायकरहल्लि
बंगारपेट
वट्रकुंटे
बंगारपेट
बावरहल्लि
बंगारपेट
अनिगानाहल्लि
बंगारपेट
अक्षेत्रगोल्लाहल्लि
बंगारपेट
मुगालाबेले
बंगारपेट
सूलकुंटे
बंगारपेट
मीठमल्लहल्लि
1278
5.
23-05-2008
कोलार
वडागेरे
1283
1.
कोलार
स्वामीगला गोल्लाहल्लि 29-05-2008
कोलार
अग्रहरा सोमरसन हल्लि
कोलार
पटना
कोलार
अग्रहरा सोमरसन हल्लि 914
2.
कोलार
मीठमल्लहल्ली
29-03-2010
मालुर 1284
करडागुर्की
1 .
3484GI /10-17
7
6
5
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कालार
06-04-29
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010
कर्नाटक
कोलार 6274
PAKI
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
2
3
4 29-05-2008
कुंटानहल्लि
मालुर
ननन्दनहल्लि
मालूर
कारगुंटटा
मालुर
मालुर
बावनहल्लि
भालुर
कडसनहल्लि
मालुर
पुरमाकनंहल्लि मालुर
दोड्डाशिवारा
मालुर
वडगनहल्लि
मालुर
चिक्कासिवारा
मालुर
मालुर
धाड्डाकडथुरु
नाचोहल्लि
मालुर
लिंगाप्रा
मालुर
हारोहल्लि
मालुर
माडिवाला
मालुर
चोकंडहल्लि
मालुर
हनुमानायकहल्लि मालुर
योशवन्तपुरा
मालुर
थिम्मापुरा
मालुर
ग्यालर
आनेपुर
2.
3347
निधरमंगला
12-12-2008
कडसनहल्लि
वडगनहल्लि
माडिवाला
मालुर 3 .
1946
नक्कनहल्लि
मालुर 15-07-2009
कडसनह
पुरमाकनहान
याशवन्तप्र
धाड्डाकड
911
करडाग
20-03 2010
काग
*. 38 22212
मालुर कोलार
कलर
कालार
लार
कनाटक
06-04 कोलार
कर्नाटक
कालार
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कर्नाटक
06-04 कोलार
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कर्नाटक
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कोलार
कर्नाटक
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कोलाए
कर्नाटक
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कोलार
कर्नाटक
कोलार
कोलार
कालार
:
कोलार
कोलार
06 04 0 कोलार
0-04 कनाटक
कर्नाटक
कालर
कगटक
06-04-25 बर्गलार
कर्नाटक
06 04-3
कर्नाट
कोलार
कालार
कोलार
कोनार
कोलार
कर्नाटक
कालार
कोलार
कोलार
06-04 200 कालार
06-04 20
06.04-2000 कालार
नाटक
06-04-2013 6275
भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 18, 2010/ মার 27 , 1932
हारोहा ल
जिना मेंगलुरु रुरन
का.अ.से 14
तारीख
2
1285
29-05-2008
काजीहोमा हाइल
हासकोटे
होसकोटे
परमनाहल्लि
होसकोटे
हिंडलु
टोसकोटे
तरवहल्लि
होसकोटे 3348
टिंडलु
होसकोटे
तरवहल्लि
2-2008
होसकोटे
दंधरगोल्लहल्ली
हांसकोटे
कटिगेनहल्लि
होसकोटे
देवरगाल्लहल्ली
होसकोटे
बमबांडे
होसकोटे
काजीहोसा हल्लि
29-03-2010
होसकाट
बनहल्लि
होसकोटे
परमनाहल्लि
होसकोटे
तरवहल्लि
होसकोटे
देवरगोनहल्लि
होसकोटे
कटिगेनहल्ली
होसकोटे
देवरगोल्लहल्ली
1279
23-05-2008
7
6
5
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
कोलार
राज्य : कर्नाटक राज्य
जिला
प्रचालन की समाप्ति कीतारीख
7
6
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
00-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010) कर्नाटक
बंगलुरु कराल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04 2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु करल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04 2010 कर्नाटक
बंगलुरु रुरल
01-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बेंगलुरु रुरल
06-04-2010 कर्नाटक
बंगलुरु रुरल
[फा. सं. आर-25011/33/2010- .आर-1 ]
बी.के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 9th September , 2010
S.O. 2328. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . 5.0 No. and dated as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) the Central Government acquired the right of user in the lands , specified in the schedule appended to those notifications .
And whereas , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . The Central Government visited the right of user in said lands , free from all encumbrances . in the Indian Oil Corporation limited .
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government , that the pipeline for the purpose of transportation of petroleum products from Chennai - Banglore in the State of Karnataka has been laid in respeci 6276
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
ofsaid lands , so the operation may be terminated in respect of the ROW ( Right of Way) in land , description of which in brief is specified in the schedule annexed to this notification .
Now therefore , as required under explanation - 1 of rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 of the said schedule as the dates of termination of operation .
SCHEDULE
District : Kolar
Taluk
Name of the Village
Sl . No.
S.O. No. and Date
2
3
4 1
1
1281
Mulbagal
Kasavuganahalli
29-05-2008
Mulbagal
Jiyapalli
Payasthanahalli
Mulbagal
Ramachandrapura
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Mylapura
Kammasandra
Mulbagal
Puliobareddyhalli
Mulbagal
Chikkaguttahalli
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Doddaguttahalli
Krishnapura
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Vajranagenahalli
Dommasandra
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Jathamangala Agrahara
Mulbagal
Sangondahalli
Keelagani
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Melagani
Padakasti
Mulbagal
Kannatha
Mulbagal
Kurubara Chadumanahalli Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Balla Agrahara
Channapura
Mulbagal
Yadahalli
Mulbagal
Chitheri
Mulbagal
Urukuntemitturu
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Avalamarakalagatta
Minijenahalli
Mulbagal
Bandahalli
Mulbagal 3345
2
Mulbagal
Chikkaguttahalli
12-12-2008
Mulbagal
Sangondahalli
Channapura
Mulbagal
Urukuntemitturu
Mulbagal
Mulbagal
Minijenahalli
Yadahalli
Mulbagal 3
1948
Ramachandrapura
Mulbagal 15-07-2009
Padakasti
Mulbagal
Chitheri
Mulbagal
State: Karnataka State
District
Date of Termination of operation
7
5
6
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Kolar
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
3
2
1
Bandahalli
6277
7
6
5
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Minijenahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
912
Kasavuganahalli
4
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
29-03-2010
Mylapura
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Puliobareddyhalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Sangondahalli
Padakasti
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Kurubara Chadumanahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Channapura
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Mulbagal
Yadahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Urukuntemitturu
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
Minijenahalli
Bandahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Mulbagal
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
1282
1
Jayamangala
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
29-05-2008
Neelakantapura
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Vadandahalli
Kamandahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Kanganalluru
Mavahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Nayakarahalli
Vatrakunte
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Bavarahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Hudukula
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Aniganahalli
Siddanahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Akshanatara Gollahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Mugalabele
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Madamangala
Sulikunte
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
3346
2
Jayamangala
Bangarpet.
12-12-2008
Kanganalluru
Kamandahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Mavahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Siddanahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Akshanatara Gollahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Mugalabele
Sulikunte
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Neelakantapura
Mittamalahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Vadandahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
3
Mavahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
1947 15-07-2009
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
Mugalabele
Vadandahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
4
Kamandahalli
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Kolar
Bangarpet
913 29-03-2010 6278
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27, 1932
2
3
4
Mavahalli
[PART Sas 5
6
7 Kolar
Bangarpet
Nayakarahalli
Karnataka
0614-2010 Kolar
Bangarpet
Vatrakunte
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
Bavarahalli
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
Aniganahalli
06-04-2011/ Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
Akshanatara Gollahalli
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
Mugalabele
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
Sulikunte
Neelakantapura
06-04-2010 Karnataka
Bangarpet Kolar
Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
5
1278
Mittamalahalli
06-04-2010
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
Bangarpet
23-05-2008
1
1283
Kolar
Vadagere
29-05-2008
Kolar
Swamygalagollahalli
Kolar
Agraharasomarasanahalli
Patna
Kolar 2
914
Kolar
Agraharasomarasanahalli 29-03-2010
Mittamalahalli
Kolar 1
1284
Malur
Karadagurky
29-05-2008
Kuntanahalli
Malur
Nakkanahalli
Malur
Malur
Karangutta
Malur
Nidharamangala
Bhuvanahalli
Malur
Kadasonnahalli
Malur
Puramakanahalli
Malur
Doddashivara
Malur
Malur
Vadaganahalli
Chikkashivara
Malur
Doddakadathuru
Malur
Nachohalli
Malur
Malur
Lingapura
Harohalli
Malur
Madivala
Malur
Chokkondahalli
Malur
Hanumanayakanahalli
Malur
Malur
Yeshavanthapura
Malur
Thimmapura
Malur
Anepura
2
3347
Malur
Nidharamangala
12-12-2008
Kadasonnahalli
Malur
Malur
Vadaganahalli
Madivala
Malur 3
1946
Nakkanahalli
Malur 15-07-2009
Malur
Nidharamangala
06.11.2016 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2011 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-01-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-01-200 Kolar
Karnataka
06.01.2010 Kolar
Karnataka
00-04-201 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2011 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-01-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-01-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010) Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-01-2010 Kolar
Karnataka
06-01-2010 भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
6279 3
4
5
6
7 Kadasonnahalli
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Puramakanahalli
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010
Malur
Kolar
Yeshavanthapura
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Doddakadathuru
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010
Malur
Karadagurky
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 911 29-03-2010
Malur
Kolar
Karangutta
Karnataka
06-04-2010
Malur
Kolar
Nidharamangala
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Kadasonnahalli
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Puramakanahalli
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Chikkashivara
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Doddakadathuru
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Nachohalli
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Lingerura
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Harohalli
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010 Madivala
Malur
Kolar
Karnataka
06-04-2010
Malur
Kolar
Hanumanayakanahalli
Karnataka
06-04-2010
Malur
Kolar
Yeshavanthapura
Karnataka
06-04-2010 District : Bangalore Rural
State : Karnataka
Taluk
Name ofthe Village
District
State
No
S.O. No. and Date
Date of Termination ofoperation
4
5
6
1
Hesakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 Bunahalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 Vranen dalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rurai
06-04-2010
Hosakote
Karatal
Bangalore Rural
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010
06-04-2010 3348
Thindlu
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 12-12-2008
Tarabahalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010
Hosakote
Devaragollahalli
Karnata
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 1949
Hosakote
Kattigenchalli
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 15-07-2009
Hosakote
Devaragollahalli
Karnataka
06-04-2010
Bangalore Kural
!
915
Bommanabande
Hosakote
Karnataka
06-09-2010
Bangalore Rural
29-03-2010
Kajihosahalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 Banahalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 Paramanahalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 Tarabahalli
Hosakote
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010
Hosakote
Devaragollahalli
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010
Hosakote
Kattigenehalli
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010
Hosakote
Devaragollahalli
Karnataka
Bangalore Rural
06-04-2010 1279 23-05-2008
[ F. No. R - 25011 / 33 / 2010 - OR - I ]
B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
6280
नई दिल्ली , 10 सितम्बर , 2010
Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th April , 2010 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil through Vadinar - Bina Crude Pipeline Project from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited .
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 15th June , 2010;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;
का.आ. 2329.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 992 , तारीख 12 अप्रैल , 2010 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 17 अप्रैल , 2010 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार संस्थापन से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कच्चे पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए वाडीनार - बीना पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत ओमान रिफाईनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 15 जून , 2010 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land , specified in the Schedule , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests on the date of the publication ofthis declaration in Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
State : M.P.
Tehsil : Bina District: Sagar
Are in Hectare
Survey No.
S. No. Name of Village
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
4
2
3
1
अनुसूची
0.310
17/2
1.
Sargoli
राज्य : मध्यप्रदेश
जिला : सागर
तहसील : बीना
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में
सर्वे नम्बर
ग्राम का नाम
क्र.सं.
[F. No. R- 31015/ 6 / 2008 - OR - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
4
3
1
2
नई दिल्ली , 10 सितम्बर , 2010
0.310
17/2
सरगोली
1.
[ फा. सं. आर -31015 / 6/ 2008 - ओ.आर- II ] ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 10th September , 2010
का.आ. 2330.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 994 , तारीख 12 अप्रैल , 2010 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 17 अप्रैल , 2010 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में S.O. 2329. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . Number S.O. 992 dated the 12th April , 2010 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
वाडीनार संस्थापन से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कच्चे पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए वाडीनार - बीना पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत ओमान रिफाईनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 14 जून, 2010 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ; और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
राज्य : मध्यप्रदेश
जिला शाजापुर
तहसील : मोहनबड़ोदिया
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में
सर्वे नम्बर
ग्राम का नाम
क्र.सं.
4
3
2
1
0.010
184/1
गोविन्दा
1 .
0.010
184/2
0.010
184/3
0.060
175
0.084
204में से
0.180
204में से
0.084
204में से
0.096
204में से
0.084
204में से
0.096
204में से
0.120
204में से
0.108
226में से
0.072
226में से
0.096
226में से
0.076
226में से
6281
4
3
1 2
0.096
353 में से
1 . गोविन्दा
0.120
353 में से
0.150
353 में में
0.120
353में से
0.075
162 में से
0.096
162में से
0.105
162 में से
0.087
393
0,060
369
0.110
370/1
0.054
346/3
0.240
345
0.144
342
0.025
336/1
0.025
336/2
0.105
1141
2. बरनावद
0.055
1142
0.013
1143
0.105
1139
0.099
1138
0.053
58
0.230
59
(0.290
60
0.157
65
0.026
56
0.026
101
0.035
107
0.053
391:2
0.180
404
0635
122
1032
130
131
214
0.010
102
0.033
211
0.146
212
0.150
224
0.078
279/2 6282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27,1932
[ PART II SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
2. बरनावद
279/1
0.083
285
0.051
252
0.014
380
0.150
389
0.150
Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th April . 2010 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land . specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of Crude Oil through vadinar- Bina Crude Pipeline Project from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited ;
280
0.117
390
0.060
403
0.120
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 14th June , 2010 ;
406
0.020
383
0.015
391/1
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act. submitted report to the Central Government ;
0.087
282
0.040
283
0.090
215
0.013
And whereas , the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for lay ing the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein ;
405
0.020
384
0.120
3. बड़ौदी
331
0.055
744
0.020
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
738
0.020
806
0.010
737
0.020
815
0.170
850
0.250
And further , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of publication of this declaration in Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , free from ali encumbrances .
814
0.085
SCHEDULE
897
0.010
904
0.100
Tehsil : Mohan Badodiya District: Shajapur State: M.P. 905
0.020
SurveyNo.
S. No. Name of Village
Area in Hectare 907
0.052
1
2
3
4 320में से
0.050
1.
Govinda
184/1
0.010 4. मोहना
1446
0.300
184/2
0010 5.
1201
कडुला
1843
0.010
0.100
6 डोकरगांव
406
0.23
175
0.060
0.084
204 p
[सं. आर-31015 / 23/2008- ओआर -11 ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
0.180
204 p
0.084
204 p
New Delhi , the 10th September , 2010
0.096
204 p
0.084
204 p
0.096
204 p
0.120
204 p
S.O. 2330.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . No. S.O. 994 dated the 12th April , 2010 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
1
3
2
1
2.
0.108
Govinda
1.
226 p
0.072
226 p
0.096
226 p
0.076
226 p
0.096
353 p
0.120
353 p
0.150
353 p
0.120
353 p
0.075
162 p
162p
0.b
162 p
0.087
393
0.060
369
0.110
370/1
0.054
346/3
0.240
345
342
0.144
0.025
336/1
0.025
336/2
0.105
1141
2.
Barnawad
0.055
1142
3.
0.013
1143
0.105
1139
0.099
1138
0.053
58
0.230
59
0.290
60
0.157
65
0.026
56
0.026
101
0.035
107
0.053
391/2
0.180
404
0.035
122
4.
0.032
130
5.
0.030
131
6.
0.117
214
0.010
102
0.033
211
6283
4
3
2
0.146
212
Barnawad
0.150
224
0.078
279/2
0.083
279/1
0.051
285
0.014
252
0.150
380
0.150
389
0.117
280
0.060
390
0.120
403
0.020
406
0.015
383
0.087
391/1
0.040
282
0.090
283
0.013
215
0.020
405
0.1.20
384
0.055
331
Badodi
0.020
744
0.020
738
0.010
806
0.020
737
0.170
815
0.250
850
0.085
814
897
0.010
0.100
904
0.020
905
0.052
907
0.050
320 p
0.300
1446
Mohana
0.100
1201
Kadula
0.23
406
Dokargoan
[No. R- 31015 /23 /2008 -OR - II ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
6284
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2331 ,- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 20/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12011/131 / 2006- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 19th August , 2010
S.O. 2331.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 20 of 2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2010 .
[No. L- 12011 / 131 / 2006 - IR ( B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
PRESENT
N. K. Purohit , Presiding Officer
1. D. No. 20/07
Reference No. 12011 / 131 / 2006 - IR( B - II ) dated: 28-5-2007 The General Secretary , Union Bank Employees Union 49 , Raghu Vihar Maharani Farm Durgapura , Jaipur - 302018
V/ s
The Regional Head Union Bank of India B -100 , University Marg , Bapu Nagar , Jaipur - 302105 .
AWARD
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] "Whether the action of the Management of Union Bank of India through Chief Manager , Jaipur in awarding the punishment of lowering down of 2 stages in the pay scale and punishment of stoppage of next annual increment for a period of 6 months without cumulative effect under the same order against one charge of Shri Phool Chand Ghavri Sub- Staff is just and fair ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "
2. Pursuant to the receipt of the reference , the registered notices were issued to both the parties and on behalf of the bank its representative put his appearance before the Tribunal . The Acknowledgement receipt of the registered notice issued to the union has been received after service . On careful perusal of the record , it is found that the address of the union on the copy of notice is similar to that of address mentioned in the reference . Even the Central Government has issued the notice to the concerned union with the direction to file its statement of claim along with relevant documents , list of witnesses , but none has appeared on behalf of the union to file its statement ofclaim .
3. In present reference , the question under consideration is whether the action of the management of the bank in awarding the punishment of lowering down of stages in the pay scale and stoppage of next annual increment against the workman Shri Phool Chand Sub - Staff is justified ? The union has espoused the case of the workman . Initial burden to prove the alleged unjustified action of the management was on the union , but none has appeared on behalf of the union to file its claim despite service of notice . Since the union has challenged the legality of the action of the bank management , the burden lies upon itto prove the illegality of the alleged action, but the union has neither filed claim statement nor adduced any evidence . There is no material on record to adjudicate the reference on merit . It appears that the union is not willing to contest the case further . Thus , under these circumstances "No Claim Award " is passed .
4. Award as above .
N. K. PUROHIT , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2010
29-7-2010
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause ( d ) of sub - section 1 & 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication which is as under : ----
का.आ. 2332 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार टयूटीकोरिन पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[ सं. एल -44011 / 2/2008- आईआर ( बी -1101 पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 6285 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2010
fixing the juniors over and above him in contravention to the Regulation 30 of Tuticorin Port Trust employees ( Recruitment , Seniority & Promotion ) regulations , 1979 as claimed by Tuticorin Port Mariners and General Staff Union is justified or not ? what relief the workman is entitled to ? " S.O. 2332. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 17/2009 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Tuticorin Port Trust and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2010 .
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as I.D. 17/2009 and issued notices to both sides. Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their Claim , Counter and Rejoinder Statement as the case may be .
[No. L -44011 /2 /2008 - IR (B - II ) ]
PUSHPENDER KUMAR . Desk Officer
3. The contentions raised by the petitioner union in the Claim Statement briefl read as follows ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Friday, the 13th August , 2010
Present : A. N. Janardanan , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 17/2009
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A ) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Tuticorin Port Trust and their Workman)
BETWEEN
: Ist Party/Petitioner
The General Secretary , Tuticorin Port Mariners and Cieneral Staff Union Beach Road, Tuticorin - 628001
Vs.
:2nd Party /Respondent
The Chairman
Tuticorin Port Trust Tuticorin -4
APPEARANCE
For the Petitioner : M / s L.G. Sahadevan , Advocate
For the Management : M / s S. Yashwanth , Advocates
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L -44011 / 2 /2008 - IR ( B - II ) dated 22-10-2008 referred the following Industrial Disputes to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
Thiru A. Kanthasamy had been promoted as UDC on ad - hoc basis w.e.f. 17-11-1990 on merit quota in the Tuticorin Port Trust as per order dated 17-11-1990 . As per RS & P Regulations - 32 ad - hoc appointments can be made for a period not more than 6 months at a time and the total period shall not exceed 1 year . The Port Management had made promotion to the post of UDC only on ad -hoc basis since Writ Petitions were pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras at that time . The Management had regularized the ad- hoc Promtions during the year 1999. In the case of Kanthasamy , the said promotion was regularized w.e.f. 24-06-1999 in the order of merit as per order dated 22-07-1999 alongwith other UDCs , junior to him . Thus his seniority order was S.No. 3. The competent DPC on 24-06-1999 had fully followed the Regulation - 30 ( v ) ofTPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations in preparing year wise panel and fixed the seniority position of Kanthasamyat S.No.3 among S.Nos . 1 to 25 mentioned in the Claim Statement . Under the above regulation , the DPC that meets shall determine the actual number of regular vacancies which arose in each of the previous years immediately preceding the year of such a meeting of the DPC and the actual number of regular vacancies to be filled - up in the current year of the meeting separately , consider only those Officers who would be within the field of choice with reference to the vacancies of each previous year starting with the earliest year onwards and prepare a select list for each year placing the select list of the earlier year above the one for the next year and so on . Till 25-02-2002 , there was no change in the seniority as circulated by Administration Order dated 22-07-1999 . The High Court had passed judgments in certain WritPetitions on the issue of filling - up of vacancies of UDC on merit quota On that basis the Port Management had a review by DPC under which Port Management revised the seniority which was not in conformity with Regualtion - 30 ( v ) of TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979 though High Court had not provided for that . The Department on 25-02-2002 révised the seniority list of UDC as per which A. Kanthasamy was placed at S. No. 25 which is not in order and is in contravention to the regulations as well as High Court's order since he was "Whether the change in seniority of Sri A. Kandasamy , UDC from that of at S. No. 3 as published vide Order No. S - 1 / 12 / 93 - E. - II dated 22-07-1999 and 6286
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
...
4. The Counter Statement contentions briefly read asfollow:
The claim petition is not maintainable on law or facts and is to be dismissed inlimini . The order dated 17-11-1990 promoting Kanthasamy as UDC was on ad - hoc basis under merit quota without referring to DPC . It was specifically mentioned that the ad - hoc promotion order was issued subject to review with reference to the revision of the High Court in Writ Petition No. 17390 of 1990 and 27289 of 1990 filed against the promotion . During 1990 to 1999 , 43 ad -hoc promotions were made due to pendency of 3 writs viz . WMP No. 27298 of 1990 , 17390 of 1990 filed by K. Raghupathy, WMP No. 37686 of 1993 in WP No. 2285 of 1993 by P. Murugan and Sri S. Peter Ponraj and WMP No. 32393 of 1993 in WP No. 2693 of 1993 By Sri V. Govindasamy. Tuticorin Port Mariners and General Staff Union represented that due to non - regularization of ad - hoc services of UDC deprived them right of option for fixation of pay . The Legal Advisor , Ports by letter dated 15-02-1999 conveyed that the Recruitment Rules for UDC having been amended on a ratio of 3 : 1 services of the employees can be regularized from the date of promotion subject to the condition that seniority in the promotion post will be determined as per the orders in the Writ Petitions . The matter was therefore proposed to be done accordingly. The DPC constituted which met on 24-06-1999 reviewed all promotions against merit quota made without reference to DPC and recommended to regularize 36 UDCs including A. Kanthasamy w.e.f. 24-06-1999 subject to review on disposal of Writ Petitions . As regularized w.e.f. 24-06-1999 as per order dated 22-07-1999 Kanthasamy was S.No. 3. On the disposal of the 3 Writ Petitions in 2001 review was to be made from 1986 to 2001 in view of the judgment of the High Court to continue the employees in UDC , promotions made against the vacancies in the ratio of 1 : 1 i.e. 50 % by promotion on the basis of seniority - cum- fitness and 50 % by limited departmental competitive examination among LDC till 1987 . The constituted review DPC which met on 19-01-2002 . 24-01-2002 and 05-02-2002 reviewed the cases according to Government instructions issued on 04-11-1992 as per which persons recruited or promoted initially on a temprary basis and confirmed subsequently in an order different from the order of merit indicated at the time of their appointment seniority would be determined by the order ofmerit indicated at the time of initial appointment and not according to the date of confirmation . The committee had taken into account approved Recruitment Rules , sanctioned strength of UDC , details of vacancies , shortfall in the post ofUDC and 25 % examination quota as in the recruitment Rules and the interse seniority of the UDC , promoted during the year assigned with reference to their interse seniority inthe feeder LDC as per Court's Order No. S - 2 / 8 / 86- E dated 13-07-1987 alongwith the confirmation made by the Chairman on 11-09-1988 and as per the instructions in promoted as UDC on 17-11-1990 on merit quota , doing great injustice to him . The review DPC met on 25-02-2002 failed to maintain the revised panel and to note the date of occurrence of vacancy under Regualtion- 30 ( v) and the date of promotion of A. Kanthasamy , both of which factors are very important for determining seniority , thus resulting in a major error disturbing seniority of Kanthasamy without valid reason . Kanthasamy should have been regualrized against the regular merit vacancy occurred on 18-12-1990 . Hisad - hoc promotion was regularized w.e.f. 24-06-1999 in the same order of merit as per order dated 22-07-1999 . The order of seniority circulated on 22-07-1999 revised on 25-02-2002 is in clear violation and deviation of Regulation- 30 ( v) , whereafter seniority of Kanthasamy became S.No. 25 from 3 , thus placing juiors promoted even after 3 years of the promotion of Kanthasamy above him . The representations of Kanthasamy having been in vain , ID raised which failed and therefore the reference is occasioned . Based on a regularization order dated 22-07-1999 and a seniority list circulated as on 01-08-1999 Kanthasamy was placed as UDC in the same order of merit as on the date of promotion between Sri J. Asokan and Smt . P. Lingammal , S.No. 107 and S.No. 109 respectively in which the DPC met on 25-02-2002 failed to comply with the Regualtion - 30 (v ) of TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979 . After 12 years Port Management revised the seniority of UDC without considering the approved Recruitment Rules . Provisions relating to preparation of year wise panels , provisions if the DPC had not met for years together , available in the Regulation -30 ( v ) of the TPTE Regulations , 1979 and placed him at S.No. 25. The dispute started after 12 years by the impugned seniority order dated 25-02-2002 , 2002 DPC failed to follow Govt . order in revising the earlier DPC. In the 2002 DPC year wise panels had not beenprepared, an essential provision in TPTE Regulations , 1979 , when the DPC not met years together at the same time the mandatory provisions are followed in 7/1999 DPC . The 2002 DPC did not follow the DPC proceeding required under Section -30 ( v ) of TPTE while implementing the judgment which does not contain specific instructions to place Kanthasamy at the bottom of seniority list . Remaining the date of promotion of Kanthasamy constant , rank of Kanthasamy in the seniority had been changed whereby hisjunior promotees became his seniors . In the seniority list dated 25-02-2002 rank at S. No.16 to S. No. 24 are juniors to Kanthasamy . Thus the Port Management has done a great error and injustice to Sri A. Kanthasamy which requires to be rectified . Hence the Administration Order dated 25-02-2002 revising the seniority against the order ofpromotion made is to be quashed and the seniority of Kanthasamy be restored to its original position as on 17-11-1990 in between Sri J. Asokan and Smt . P Lingammal as per Adminstration Order dated 22-07-1999 and futherto provide him subsequent promotions w.e.f. the date on which his imedate junior was promoted.
6287 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
power . For amendment Board has to approve and get it published in the Official Gazette . Judicial review of the DPC proceedings already conducted in accordance with Standing Government Instructions and Rules is warranted as per OM No. 22034/ 3 / 2007- Estt . ( D) dated 11-04-2007 . Judicial review does not arise only if DPC proceedings are conducted in accordance with Govt . Instructions and Rules . Inthe case of workman DPC itself had not been constituted in accordance with Regulation- 29 of TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979 for which Class - III DPC is to be constituted . The DPC constituted on 05-02-2002 had not followed government instructions relating to preparing revised panels , if the DPC had not met years together and implemented the OM dated 04-11-1992 retrospectively which is not advisable according to the OM itself. So much so, judicial review is the only alternative . DPC applied OM dated 04-11-1992 applicable only after 04-11-1992 retrospectively and considered seniority list of LDC as on 01-04-1983 wrongly changing the position of workman to hisperil . DPC met on 24-06-1999 followed the guidelines and cannot be questioned . Hence the claim .
6. The evidence consists of the evidence of WWI and Ex.W1 to Ex.W11 on the Petitioner's side and the evidence of MWI and Ex . M1 to Ex.M9 on the Respondent's side .
7. Points for consideration are :
Department of Personnel and Training , New Delhi OM No. 20011 /90 - Estt . (D) dated 04-11-1992 reviewed the promotions and made recommendations . Thus seniority of Kanthasamy was fixed at S. No. 25 as per order dated 25-02-2002. Year wise panels from the years 1990 to 1999 were not prepared in respect of ad - hoc promotions of 43 UDCs due to the pendency of cases . It was not appropriate to prepare year wise panel due to pendency of cases in High Court with a view to avoid complications . The review DPC meetings held on 19-01-2002 , 24-01-2002 and 05-02-2002 were to review cases and regularize ad - hoc promotion of UDC in the year 2001 itself. As per general principles to determine the interse seniority, seniority of eligible persons for promotion shall be the same as the relative seniority in the lower grade from which they are promoted . Review DPC on 25-02-2002 recommended regularization of 25 UDCs promoted against meritquota and derermined the seniority of A. Kanthasamy at S. No. 25 based on his LDC rok as on 01-04-1983 and purely based on merit indicated at the time of initial appointment and not according to confirmation . Hence placing Kanthasamy at S.No. 25 by the duly constituted DPC as per the instructions dated 04-11-1992 is just and in order . As per the guidelines issued vide DoPT's OM 22034/ 3/2007 - Estt . ( D) dated 11-07-2007 judicial review of DPC proceedings conducted as per Govt . Standing Instructions and Rules is not warranted . Revision of seniority already determined therefore could not be accede to . The claim is to be dismissed
5. The contentions raised in the Rejoinder Statement over and above those in the Claim statement are as follows:
( i ) Whether the change in seniority of workman / UDC from that at S.No. 3 as per order dated 22-07-1999 and fixing the juniors above him contravention to the Regulation - 30 of the Tuticorin Port Trust Employees ( Recruitinent . Seniority and Promotion) Regulations , 1979 is justified or not ?
( ii) To what relief is the concerned workman is entitled ?
Points ( i ) and ( ii ) :
The pending Writ Petitions were not regarding seniority of UDC but were relating to ratio promotion between merit quota and seniority quota . The workman having been promoted under mern quota on the basis of mark obtained in examination the basis of seniority of LDC is not sustainable . There was no necessity to review the seniority in UDC with reference to that in LDC as on 01-04-1983 since OM dated 04-11-1992 is applicable from the date of isue from viz . 04-11-1992 . Therefore seniority of workman in UDC has to be fixed on the basis of seniority list of LDC as on the date of promotion of the workman i.e. the seniority list of LDC as on 01-04-1990 . Therefore fixing seniority on the basis of seniority list of LDC as on 01-04-1983 for the promotion on 17-11-1990 is not based on rules . The instructions dated 04-11-1992 are not applicable to the present case . While there is a finalized seniority list of LDC as on 01-04-1990 how the seniority list as on 01-0421983 LDC could be taken ? As per OM dated 04-11-1992 past cases could not be re - opened and the DPC is accordingly in error . DPC had not followed Regulation- 30 ( v ) TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations and prepared year wise panels for the promotions for the years 1990 to 1999. Ports order dated 13-07-1987 No. S - 2 /8 / 86 . E.II is superseding the Regulation - 30 ( v) for which port Management has no
8. Perused the written arguments submitted by the Petitioner's learned counsel and heard the oral arguments advanced on behalf of the Respondent . Also perused the records and documents . The arguments on behalf of the petitioner advanced in consonance of and consistent with the pleadings and the supporting documents produced are that till 25-02-2002 there was no change in the order of seniority as per the circulated administration order dated 22-07-1999 . The impugned revision of seniority by the Management is not in accordance with Regulation - 30 (v ) TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979. The review DPC that met 2on25-02-2002 ignored the date of occurrener of vacancy as required under Regulation - 30 ( v ) and date of promotion ofthe workman which was vital in the matter of fixation of seniority . The ad - hoc promotion of workman on 17-11-1990 regularized w.e.f. 24-06-1999 as per order dated 22-07-1999 is valid . The revision of seniority on 25-02-2002 is in violation of Regulation - 30 (v) TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 6288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
DPC as such but is against the 2 inconsistent decisions of two DPCs . In the case on hand there is no allegation of malice , bias or arbitrainess against the DPC held subsequently revising the seniority and assigning a lower rank to the workman which is not suited to him . Still it is well brought out that the said DPC was not a properly constituted one but was one which did not act according to the relevant rules and directions of the Govt . So as to be able to supersede the proceedings and decision taken by the earlier DPC which was in order in terms of its constitution as well as the legal manner and procedure in which it held the proceedings and passed the resolutions . The change effected in the seniority of Kanthasamy from that at S. No. 3 as per cider dated 22-07-1999 and fixing the juniors over and above him in contravention to the Regulation - 30 ( v ) TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979 is not justified . Therefore , the workman is entitled to succeed in bis claim for quashing the revision of his seniority in the Grade of UDC issued by the Administration Order No. S -36/ 3 / 93 / E - II ( I ) dated 25-02-2002 and to have his seniority restored as UDC in his original position as on 17-11-1990 in between Sri J. Asokan , UDC and Smt . P. Lingammal , UDC as per Administration Order No. S - 1 / 12 / 93.E.II dated 22-07-1999 and for subsequent promotions w.e.f. the date on which his immediate junior was promoted . The Respondent Management is given a direction accordingly .
10. The reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 13th August , 2010 )
A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer
:
Witnesses Examined :- For the I Party / Petitioner
For the II Party / Management :
WWI . Sri D. M. Stephen Fernando MW1 , Sri S. P. Mohan Kumar
Documents Marked : From the Petitioner's side
Date
Ex.No.
by which rank of seniority of Kanthasamy was lowered from 3 to 25 in which his juniors are ranked above him . The DPC of 24-06-1999 is proved valid and competent in terms of its constitution which considered the relevant rules in the matter of seniority and promotion and which also took into account all the relevant matters for consideration . In that DPC Kanthasamy was given the appropriate rank at S. No. 3 in between Sri J. Asokan , UDC and Smt . P. Lingammal , UDC respectively at S.No. 107 and 109. The 2002 DPC was incompetent from the point of view of constitution as well as on the fact that the same failed to follow the relevant government orders in revising the earlier DPC or the Regulation under 30 ( v ) TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979. The judgments of the High Courts in various Writ Petitions do not contain specific instructions regarding seniority . The Management is thus in error in granting a lower rank to the workman . In fact the Writ Petitions were not regarding seniority question but were regarding ratio aspect of promotions interse different categories . The promotion of the workman was also on the merit quota against seniority -cum- fitness quota . Circular of Government date 04-11-1992 cannot be applied retrospectively. The application of seniorty list of LDC as on 01-04-1983 as the basis while there is finalized seniority list of LDC as on 01-04-1990 is also not called for under the rules . The Management has no power to supersede Regulation - 307 ) TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations except in accordance with the law and procedure established by law with amendment of the regulation and the approval of the Board and consequent publication in the Official Gazette . Judicial review is warranted in cases where DPC proceedings are conducted not in accordance with government instructions and rules . The DPC which revised the seniority is not one constituted in accordance with Regulation - 29 of TPTE ( RS & P ) Regulations , 1979 which provides for a Class - III DPC to be constituted with a hairman and 3 other members whereas the DPC that met on 25-02-2002 was not so . In such a case a judicial review is Et only alternative . The DPC that met on 24-06-1999 is not to be superseded by the subsequent one and the proceedings passed by the former are to prevail .
Description
Ex. WI
Photostat copy of Port Trust Regulation
13-07-2007
Ex. W2
Photostat copy of Proceedings of Chairman in No. S2 /8 /86- E1
Ex.W3 17-11-1990 Photostat copy of Order of Promotion as Upper Division Clerk
04-11-1992
Ex . W4
Photostat copy of circular of Government of India , Department ofPersonnel and Training , Office Memorandum No. 20011 /5/90- Estt. (D)
9. The arguments of the learned counsel for the Respondent are that the ad- hoc promotion given to workman was subject to review and the seniority is to be determined on the basis of merit indicated at the time of initial appointment and not according to the date of confirmation . There is no discrimination against Kanthasamy. He relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Mysore Vs. C.R. Seshadri and Others (1974-4 - SCC - 308 ) , State Bank of India and Others Vs. Mohammad Mynuddin ( 1987-4 - SCC - 486 ) , both of which lay down that in absence of allegations of malafides , bias , arbitrainess , interference in the decision of the DPC is not called for . These decisions have no application to the facts of this case . Here the challenge is not against decision of भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
24-06-1999
Ex .W5
Photostat copy of Minutes of Departmental Promotion Committee
22-07-1999
Ex. W6
Photostat copy of Regularization Order
22-11-2000
Ex.W7
Photostat copy of the Order in WP No. 20693 of 1993
Ex.W8 15-02-2001 Photostat copy of the Order in WP No. 17390 of 1990
Ex.W9 19-10-2001 Photostat copy of the Order in WP No. 20285 of 1993
05-02-2002
Ex.W10
Photostat copy of Minutes of the Review Meeting held on 19-01-2002, 24-01-2002 and 05-02-2002
Ex.W11 25-02-2002 Photostat copy of the Revised order of seniorit
From the Management's side
Date
Ex.No.
Description
01-4-1983
Ex. M1
Copy of the seniority List of LDC as on 01-04-1983 13-07-1987
Ex. M2
Corrigendum issued by the Respondent in respect of fixing seniority in the grade of UDC 17-11-1990
Ex.M3
Copy of Port'sOrder appointing Sri A. Kandasamy asUDC on adhoc basis Ex.M4 4-11-1992 Copy of the DoPT's OM No. 2011 / 5/90-Estt . (D) dated 04-11-1992
24-6-1999
Ex. M5
Copy of the Minutes of the Meeting of the DPC for regularization of adhoc promotion made to the grade of UDC
22-07-1999
Ex.M6
Copy of the order of regularization of adhoc promotees made to the grade ofUDC with effect from 24-06-1999
22-11-2000
Ex. M7
Copy of the order passed in WP 20693 of 1993
15-02-2001
Ex. M8
Copy of the order passed in WP 17390 of 1999
25-02-2002
Ex.M9
Copy of the Port's order No. S-36/3/93 - Estt.II ( I ) revising the seniority list of UDC's नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2333.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध 3484 GI/10-19
6289 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कोलकता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/ 2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2010 कोप्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल -12011 / 116/2006- आईआर( बी- II ) ] पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th August , 2010
S.O. 2333. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 14 of 2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2010 .
[No. L- 12011 / 116/2006 - IR (B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 14 of 2007
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of UCO Bank AND
theirWorkmen
Present : Mr. Justice Manik Mohan Sarkar , Presiding Officer
Appearance :
Onbehalf of the Management : None
None
Onbehalf of the Workmen:
Industry: Banking State: West Bengal
Dated: 9th July, 2010
AWARD
By Order No. L- 12011 / 116/ 2006 - IR ( B - II ) dated 01-05-2007 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) and ( 24) referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:
" hether the action of the Management of UCO Bank by not regularizing Shri Swapan Mondal , Part time sweeper who claimed to have been working for mo: han 6years continuously in UCO Bank is justified ? ! foot, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? " 2. When case is called out today , none is present on behalf of either of the parties . It appears from record that none also appeared on earlier date , i.e 09-06-2010 . It further appears from record that A.D. Card has been received after service of the notice upon the management as itwas noted in the order of the said date . The workmen's 6290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
association is still absent today and no A.D. Card has been received back after service of notice upon it . The notice upen the workmen's association is found to have been issued under Registered Post with A.D. on 13-05- 2010 and it was sent to the address as mentioned in the order of reference . Thus , the service of notice is treated to have been done even after non - receipt of A. D. Card .
3 The conduct of the workmen's association representing the concerned workman both on the last date as well as today is found to be reluctant to come before the Tribunal to proceed with the present reference which was initiated at the instance of the said association as it appears from the order of reference .
4. In the circumstance , it is presumed that the workmen's association is not interested to proceed with the present reference for reasons best known to it though the reference is in respect of a single workman , namely, Shri Swapan Mondal , Part-time Sweeper and his claim for regularization was espoused by the said association which this: management Bank denied .
5. Since the workmen's association is not present to place its claim , it is presumed that the claim is not subsisting now . Accordingly , the present reference is disposed of by treating non - prosecution by the workmen and a " No Dispute " Award is passed .
JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR , Presiding Officer Dated , Kolkata , The 9th July , 2010
नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2334.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2010 को प्राप्त [ सं. एल -12011/ 13/2006 - आईआर ( ची पुष्पेन्दर कुमार, अंक अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th August ,
4.0 . 2334. In pursuance of Section 17 on the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the awarer . No. 48 of 2006 ) of the Central Government Ind - etmel i'r bunal - curry- Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the inviusarnai Dispute between the ensin relationto the magement of Bank of Baroda and their workmen , watea was received by the Central Grovernment on 19.8-2011
No. L-1206313 2006 - IR ( B - II ) ] PUSHPENIYE KUMAR , Desk Officer
[ PART II SEC . 300
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALARI CUM - LABOUR COURT , JAIPUR PRESENT
N. K. Purohit , Presiding Ofhear
I. D. No. 48/06
Reference No. 12-11 / 13 / 2006 - IR ( B - II ) dated : 14-6-2006 The Regional Secretary Bankof Baroda Karamchari Union C/ o BOD , D - 38 Ashok Marg, Ahinsha Circle , Jaipur - 302001 .
V/ s
The Asstt . General Manager Bank of Baroda , Regional Office . Anand Bhawan , 4th Floor , S.C. Road , Jaipu AWARD
29-7-2010 1. The Central Government in exercise of the per ets conferred under clause ( d ) of Sub Section 1 & 2 ) Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes act 1947 has reteerge the following Industrial dispute to this tribunas ist adjudication which is as under : -
"Whether the action taken by the Manseren Bank of Baroda awarding the punishmenta vid letter dated 29-3-2004 to Shri Ram Pratap Meena , then Cashier Noemur Fort Branch presently posted at Karauti is legally corret and justified ? If not , whatheher the employee isendcesito and from which date ? "
2. Pursuant to the receipt of the reference , the registered notices were issued to both the parties . On bah .' t of the bank its representative put his appearance on 5-2- 2007 but the werkman did not appear on the said date . Later on the post of the Presiding Officer remain vacant till August , 2009. Therefore . on 7-12-2009 order was passed to issue from notices to the parties . The representative on behalf of the bank put his appearance before this Tribunal on 22-1-2010 . On careful perusal of the record , it is find that the acknowledgement receipt of the registered issued to the Regional Secretan received after service and the address of i copy of notice is similar to that of mentioned in the reference . Even the Central Government has issued the notice to the concerned union with the direction to file te claim along with relevent documents but none his atted on behalf of the union to file its claian temen !. he Con has reen 3. In present reference , the question under consideration is whether the action of the Bank in awarding the punishment to the workman Sh . Ram Pratap Meenais justmed ?
4 Since the union has espoused the case of the workman & has challenged the action of the bank's management , the burden was uper the union to prove the 6291 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
=..
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal -
illegality of the alleged action but despite of the service of registered notice , none has appeared on behalf of the union to file claim statement . Resultantly, no material could be placed before the Tribunal to adjudicate the matter on merit . It appears that the union is not willing to contest the case further . Under these circumstances "No Claim Award " is passed in this matter .
2. Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in awarding punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect etc , to Sh . Ram Baran clerk cum cashier at their Sultanpur Branch U. P. vide their order No. ROM / ENQ / 2080 / 96 dated 27-05-96 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?
4. Award as above .
N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2335.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उन उर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरशिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्न 62 98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012 /79/97- आईआर ( बी -11 ) ] पुष्पंन्दर कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 19th August , 2010 S.O. 2335. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 62/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 19-8- 2010.
[No. L - 12012 / 79 / 97 - IR ( B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH , HJS , PRESIDING
OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , KANPUR
Industrial Dispute No. 62 of 98
Between
Sri P. K. Tiwari ,
Vice President
Union Bnk Staff Association , 3/192 , Viram Khand , Gomti Nagar , Lucknow
And
The General Manager ,
Union Bank of India
Zonal Office
Sharda Tower II floor , Kapoorthala Complex ,
Aliganj ,
Lucknow.
AWARD
3. Brief facts are that it is an admitted fact that Sri Ram Baran Singh was working as clerk cum cashier with Union Bank of India . It is stated that he was earlier posted atGhazipur Degree College Branch of the Bank and had nothing to do with the business of Currrency Chest of Ghazipur . He hails from Kanpur . his wife was posted at Sultanpur a service of U.P govt . and he applied for his transfer to Sultanpur . Sri K R Rahmani was the Regional Officer of the Bank at the relevant time and because of his prejudices with majority and recognized state union , be was tempering minority union at Ghazipur Region. So he was trying to falsely trap the accused workman on the one score or the other . In furthereance of this object only issue of transfer order he has couched hatched a conspiracy against the workman and on 28-9-94 asked the workirante accompany with treasure of Rs . 21 Crore which was being remitted to the Currency Chest SBI at Ranjhi at Zabalpor from the currency chest of Ghazipur. As he was neither deployed in the Ghazipur Currency Chest nor at the parent branch Ghazipur nor at Regional Office , he should not have been asked for the above assignment as per system except in the case of exigency . As there was a conspiracy to place the workman under suspension on his mere objection to the said unjust and unreasonable instruction . the workman had no options but to obey the orders . As per rule the treasure was kept under triple arrangement at the currency chest SBI Ranijhi . District Madhya Pradesh and the third set kept was handed over to the workman . Workman being Potdar accompanying the treasurer cannot leave Ranijhi till the entire cash was counted and a final receipt was obtained as required . Before the arrival of the treasurer from Ghazipur three other remittances from three other currency chests reached Ranjhi Currency Chest . Authorities of the Currency Chest at Ranjhi started counting on first come first serve basis and the workman had to wait till for his turn . The mother of the workman was seriously ill at Kanpur and due to his deployment he could not visit her . Workman remained at SBI Ranjhi till 23-3-95 when he was given final receipt in form G and was officially released for reporting at Ghazipur . On being relieved he made his leave application and proceeded for Kanpur to see his ailing mother and after reavailing leave he reported at Ghazipur on 30-03-95 when he was relieved for Sultanpur Branch . Sultanpur branch of the bank is under administrative control of AGM Regional Office , Kanpur and the Regional Manager of Regional Office Ghazipur is junior to his counterpart of Kanpur in rank also . There are nine different regions in the state . The General Manager . Lucknow, oversees the work of all the nine regional offices functioning in the State of U. P.
1. Central Governrnent , MOL , New Delhi , vide notification No. L - 12012 / 79 / 97 - IR ( B - II ) dated 03-04-98 , 6292
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
8. Opposite party has filed written statement . It is alleged by them that the reference order is bad in law . There isno cause of action to the claimant . Reference order is void and bad in eye of law . There is no industrial dispute . It is stated that Sri Ram Baran Claimant was issued a charge sheet dated 19-12-95 mentioning the misconduct detailed in memo dated 12-5-95 , which mentions the gross and minor misconduct of the claimant as stated in Para 7 of the written statement . The enquiry officer conducted the inquiry thoroughly ; the management witness was also cross examined by the defense . The inquiry officer has given opportunity to the employee for defending his case but the charge sheeted employee submitted to the enquiry officer that they do not want to examine any witness nor they want to tender any defense representation and closed evidence . The inquiry held and concluded after hearing oral arguments . The enquiry officer made the initial finding date 23-5-96 and final finding dated 27-5-96 .
4. Regional Manager Regional Ghazipur of the bank by shooting his administrative jurisdiction unauthorizedly issued an absurd and none sense show cause notice dated 12-05-95 to the workman calling for his explanations on the counts for which he was not responsible. He submitted his reply on which some sitting in the Industrial Relation Department Central Office Mumbai of the Bank proclaiming himself as disciplinary authority issued a charge sheet dated 19-12-95 , against the workman and appointed Sri A. K. Pujara the then Deputy Manager ( P ) Regional Office Meerut to conduct the inquiry against the workman and to impose the punishment in utter disregard to the provisions of service conditions . Shri Pujara called the workman at Faizabad on 17-04-96 and asked him to admit the charges threatening him for dire consequences . As he has not committed the alleged misconduct he refused to oblige Sri Pujara . Thereafter on 21-05-96 , the inquiry was unauthorizedly and illegally committed at Varanasi . He alleged that he had objected on the inquiry proceedings mainly on the following points
Themisconducts were held proved and punishment imposed is as under
a. Unauthorized / without authority
Gross misconduct
b. Biased/ Prejudice
( i ) Doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank c . Loss of Faith
( ii) Willful insubordination .
d . None application/ closed mind .
9. For both the acts the punishment imposed was stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect , for minor misconduct censure was imposed.
10. Thereafter he made an appeal , being devoid of a merit which was rejected . Union Bank Staff Association moved before the ALC @ ,, Allahabad , but conciliation proceedings ended in failure . It is stated that all the concerned officers are fully known and there is no question of not kowing the identity of the concerned officers of the management . Management acted fully in accordance with laws and rules of natural justice in the matter . It is stated thatthe finding of the enquiry officer are neither perverse nor objectionable . It is therefore , prayed that the claim statement be rejected .
5. He alleged that the enquiry officer had not given him proper opportunity . Personal haring was granted in the absence of defense representative Sri P. K. Tiwari . So called enquiry officer /disciplinary authority unauthorizedly and illegally imposed the punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect and censure vide memorandum dated 27-05-96 . The workman also preferred an appeal but the appellate authority being part of sadistic and vindictive management of the bank set over the appeal of the workman . The appellate authority summarily dismissed the appeal on 23-09-96 when the matter was pending before the ALC @ Allahabad for conciliation proceedings. The conciliation proceedings were ended in failure therefore ; the matter was referred to GOI for reference .
11. Both the parties have filed documentary evidence . Opposite party has adduced oral evidence also . He has adduced one witness Sri A.K. Pujara M.W.1 .
12. Clamant has filed 5 documents vide list dated 8-08-03 . These documents are Union Bank of India Original Memorandum dated 19-12-95 , dated 23-5-96 , 27-05-96 along with its enclosure . Appeal preferred by workman , Union Bank of India letter dated 24-9-96. They have also filed documents vide list dated 18-09-03 . These are memorandum dated 12-05-95 , in original , carbon copy of applicants letter dated 30-06-95 .
6. The claimant has disclosed the aversions regarding without authority in Para 52 of the claim statement alleging that the present charge sheet vis - a- vis the appointment letter of EO- cum- DA and MR have been issued by someone sitting in industrial Relation Department Central Office sans disclosing his identity and without due and proper authority from the Principle Officer as required under clause 19.14 of BPS as amended and modified by clause 3 (b ) of BPS dated 31-10-89 . He has also disclosed the grounds regarding non application of mind in Para 53.1 to 53.15 . He has also alleged the basic error which has been committed by the enquiry officer/disciplinary athority in Para 55 ( 1 ) of the claim statement .
7. Therefore , he prayed that the charge sheet inquiry proceedings , finding including the order of punishment and the order of the appellate authority be set aside exonerating of the charges levelled against him with all the consequential benefits.
13. Opposite party has filed original enquiry proceedings . There are 53 documents . these documents are copy of ZO Lucknow dated 24-9-96 , copy of appeal , copy of appellate order , copy of IR Division , copy of memo issued by RO Meerut to Sri Ram Baran , copy of final order passed by the enquiry officer dated 27-5-96 copy of proceedings of inquiry , copy of IR Division issued to Sri A.K. Pujara , and other letters issued by the opposite party [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
in favour of Sri Ram Baran , copy of exhibits M - 7 to M - 22 , copy of exhibit D - 1 to D - 5 . There are other letters filed by the opposite party along with the list of documents . I will discuss all these relevant documents during my discussion .
14. Heard the arguments and perused the record.
15. It is the contention of the authorized representative for the workman that according to the circulars and schedule the disciplinary authority in the case as provided in the schedule is Branch Manager under whom the employee is working or authority above the branch manager or Assistant Suptd in Zonal office or authority above Asstt. Suptd in ZO or Personal Officer / Suptd in the Department of Personnel and Central Office/ authority above Superintendent of personal and Central Office/ authority above superintendent of personal and Central Office . These authorities are for the officials / staff working in the branch / extension counters . This fact has not been disputed by the opposite party also .
16. Now the question arises as to who can be the disciplinary authority in the present case . It is contended by authorized representative for the workman that the charge sheet has been issued by the disciplinary authority and is paper no . 27/1 . It has been issued by the Industrial Relation Department Central Office . The Central Office is atMumbai which fact has also not been disputed . It is contended that there is no designation of the disciplinary authority, there is no name , identity could not be established who is issuing the charge sheet in the name of disciplinary authority . For a moment if this charge sheet is accepted that it has been issued by the disciplinary authority as claimed by the opposite party it states that Sri Ram Baran is informed that memorandum dated 12-05-95 issued to himby Regional Office Ghazipur will form part of this charge sheet . It further states that Sri Ram Baran is informed that a departmental inquiry into the aforesaid misconduct will be held by Sri A K Pujara . Dy . Manager ( P ) Regional Office , Meerut . The datetime and venue of inquiry will be intimated to Sri Ram Baran in due course . This charge sheet is dated 19-12-95 . There is a letter Ext . M - 1 filed by the opposite party appointing Sri A. K. Pujara as the enquiry officer . It is also written in this letter that he shall complete the inquiry within three months and monthly progress report of the inquiry will be sent to the disciplinary authority. Both these letters charge sheet as well as paper M - 1 nowhere gives the power of disciplinary authority to Sri A K Pujara .
17. Now this is a fact that Sri A K Pujara has passed the punishment order against the CSE vide his order no . 2080-96 - dated 27-05-96 as inquiry officer /disciplinary authority.
18. Now the question arises whether there can be two disciplinary authorities at a single time. My answer is " no " , because it is against the principle of administrative laws as well as principles of natural justice . Head office has not delegated his powers to Sri A K Pujara to become a disciplinary authoriy . Moreover , according to the schedule only the branch manager or the authority above in rank can be designated as disciplinary authority . It is the
6293
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
contention of the opposite party that Sri A. K. Pujara was the personnel officer in the Department of Personnel at Central Office , does not carry any weight . Firstly , Sri A. K. Pujara is not posted at Central Office at that time and he wasposted at Regional Office Meerut . Moreover the person should be of the rank of branch manager and above . A.R. of the claimant has drawn my attention towards clause 14 of First Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-66 , which state that the Chief Executive or principal officer in India of a bank or alternate officer at the head office or principal office appointed by him for the purpose shall decide which officer shall be empowered to hold inquiry and take disciplinary action in the case of each office or establishment . As such now only one officer can be authorized by Chief Executive Officer to act as disciplinary authority of the workman . Therefore , in the present case the Chief Executive Officer has no where appointed Sri A. K. Pujara Dy. Manager below the rank of branch manager as disciplinary authority . It is also contended that the memorandum dated 12-5-95 issued by Regional Manager of Regional Office Ghazipur has no locus standi . It is stated that the charge sheet issued by disciplinary authority though not identifiable cannot be further redelegate his power to another disciplinary authority. It is contended that Dy . Manager (P ) Sri A.K. Pujara Meerut is an authority not below the rank of AGM but also below the rank of Branch Manager of Sultanpur branch . Therefore , has got no locus standi to act as disciplinary authority in the case .
19. Therefore , I have considered the whole record and heard the arguments .
20. Opposite party has produced Sri A K Pujara as witness M.W.1 . he has not shown any authority as to from whom he attained the power to act as a disciplinary authority. Auth . Representative for the claimant has given him a suggestion that he has wrongly been appointed as a disciplinary authority . It was the duty of Sri Pujara to submit his findings before the competent disciplinary authority , which he failed and over stepped into the shoes of disciplinary authority .
21. Therefore , the charge sheet dated 19-12-95 which does not identify the disciplinary authority stands vitiated . Not only on this ground but on this ground also that there cannot be two disciplinary authorities at the same time . Similarly the punishment order passed by Sri A K Pujara assuming himself to be the disciplinary authority does not hold good in the eye of law as punishment order , which is void , therefore , this punishment order also stands vitiated and deserves to be quashed. When punishment order is quashed question of passing order by the appellate authority does not arise and that too is hereby set aside .
22. Therefore , the order dated 27-05-96 is not legal and justified and therefore , reference is decided in favour of claimant and against the opposite party.
Dated: 10-08-2010
RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer 6294
[PART 11 - SEC .
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27, 1932
नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2336. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 68/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/ 89/2007- आई आर (बी- II ) ] पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th August , 2010
S.O. 2336. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 68/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-08-2010 .
[No. L - 12012/ 89 /2007 - IR( B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Thursday , the 12th August , 2010
Present : A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 68 of 2007
(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Indian Bank and their Workman )
BETWEEN
:
Sri D. Chandrasekhar
Petitioner/ I Party
Vs.
Respondent / II Party The General Manager ( IED ) : Indian Bank Personnel Department Head Office , 66 , Rajaji Salai Chennai - 600001
APPEARANCE
For the Petitioner
: M/ s . K. M. Ramesh For the Management : M/ s T.S. Gopalan & Co.
AWARD
TheCentral Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 12012 / 89 / 2007 - IR ( B - II ) dated 24-10-2007 referred the following industrial Dispute to this Tribul for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the action of the management of adion Bank , Chennai in imposing the penalty of be discharged from service with superannuation benefits and without disqualification from future employment " on Sri D. Chandrasekhar is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the workran entitled?"
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribuni has numbered it as L.D. 68/2007 . Pursuant to notice Lo parties entered appearance through advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement as the case may be 3. In the Claim Statement , the contentions Parsed briefly read as follows:
The First Party while was working as Clerk /Short in G.A. Road Branch of the Respondent Bank was suspended on 06-06-2000 alleging him to have had on 3.06.2000 misused a sum of Rs . 70,000 by paying to a crediterte a his debt out of cash entrusted to him and be thereby misappropriated bank money . On 23-10-2000 he was issued a Charge Sheet for gross misconduct under Clause - 19.5 +j of the Bipartite Settlement . An enquiry was held in whiza he was led blindfolded which commenced on 23-05-2001 and ended on 08-10-2001 examining witnesses ( i ) Mr. R. Ranganathan , Senior Manager ( Retd . ) , Circle Office Chennai , ( ii ) Mr. K. Chakrapani , Asstt . Manager ( ketd. ) from GA Road Branch and the ( iii ) Mr. M. Ramgopal . Manager (Retd .) from the same branch. The Enquiry Officer was biased in favour of the Management and prejudand towards the petitioner not listening to the defence representative . The enquiry is not fair and proper and ts vitiated. The copy of the enquiry report dated 31-05-2002 was supplied to the petitioner on 05-06-2002 to which on 22-06-2002 he submitted explanation . Thereafter on 04-09-2002 Show Cause Notice proposing punishment of " Be discharged from service with superannuation benefits and without disqualification from future employment " to which also he submitted reply denying to be guilty . He also appeared for personal hearing on 27-09-2002 and submitted his grievances . The Disciplinary Authority on 25-02-2003 imposed modified punishment of "Discharge " in terms of Clause - 6 ( d ) of the Bipartite Settlement dated 10-04-2002 which is illegal , unjustified and improper and amounts to victimization in unfair labour practice making FirstParty a scapegoat . His appeal dated 03-04-2003 was rejected on 19-07-2005 without applying the mind and without considering his submissions . The enquiry is vitiated on technical ground of Dy . General Manager 6295 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
6. The evidence consists of oral evidence of WW1 and Ex . WI to Ex. W21 on the petitioner's side and the oral evidence of MWI and Ex.M1 to Ex.M15 on the Respondent's side .
Points ( i ) and ( ii )
Suryanarayanan assuming role of Disciplinary Authority adopting the Charge Sheet . The charges have not been proved in the enquiry. The finding is perverse . It is prayed that on re - appreciation of the evidence an independent conclusion may be arrived at . Hence the prayer for reinstatement with backwages and all other benefits .
4. The Counter Statement contentions bereft of unnecessary details are as follows:
7. Heard arguments of both sides and perused the enquiry proceedings , report and documents . The learned counsel for the petitioner would canvass for the contention that the instance of misuse of a sum of money to the extent ofRs . 70,000 admitted by the petitioner is not a case of misappropriation so as to cause any prejudice to the Bank or indeed to the customers . The petitioner , a physically handicapped workman appointed under the very quota with an ailing and mentally retarded child had incurred heavy debts due to his poor background situations . He had to repay Rs . 70,000 to a creditor for a sum of Rs . 50,000 taken on advance from him for a short period and for the repayment of the amount the petitioner while was being harassed to the core with intimidations the petitioner was , in order to wriggle out of the situation , paying the sum to the creditor in anticipation of arrival of his father- in- law with the sum with whom the petitioner has had arranged to make up the sum by pledging the jewels of his family by the noon on the day which did not work well . His Father- in - law as explained in writing by the petitioner before the Management arrived only iate and that too he came with a sum of Rs . 50,000 only which he by then itself adjusted towards too late a receipt on the day and the balance amount of Rs . 20,000 was made good immediately on the next morning . According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is not to be taken as a serious misconduct and the bank is not put to any loss nor any customer made victim to any hardship . The petitioner on his own motion made good the shortage. Inere has not been any falsification of account or fraud committed by him . There is no adverse past record against him. Invoking the benevolent provision under Section - lla of the ID Act , the petitioner may be imposed a kesser punishment, serting aside his punishment of discharge putting him in economic death It is of paramount importance that the bank employees should not have a propensity to be dishonest under any circumstance . Anyone erring forfeits confidence reposed in him and ceases to be suitable for employment . The bank is never persuaded not to terminate service of such erring employee by the reason of family circumstances , personal difficulties , heavy indebtedness , etc. which are not relevant considerations to bestow any leniency which if shown might be cited as a prerredent by the similarly placed . The petitioner came into service in the year 1988 as a disabled person . The employees are required to manage their affairs in a manner not to expose them to financial pressures or temptation to lay hands on bank's cash . On 05-06-2000 at around 0330 PM cash was not closed . The petitioner told Asstt . Manager that there is a difference of Rs . 70,000 and that he had gone out to bring the cash for adjustment , which he adjusted by raising a Debit Voucher for Rs . 70,000 debiting SP -2 , that he brought Rs . 50,000 remitted to the stoeipt , that next day he emitted the balance of Rs . 24,000 or 1 thn the debit entry was revera d. The petitioner in beter given admitted his misu ...To Show Cause ordered 06-06-2000 , on 23-06-2020 , theepetitionerpetitioner sax reph admitting his mistake and peased for lenience on huma. Marian consideration. During ine enquiry the pethics erpressed extreme sorrow for supervention of the sherrage du to miscalculation , unfortunate and unexpowied turn of events and that he never intended to act prejudicially. The punishment is fully justified and valid in law . The same does not call for interference . There is no violation of principles of natural justice . There is nothing wrong in the Dy . General Manager pursuing the disciplinary action issued by his predecessor . Themisconduct was never in dispute. The Enquiry Officer was not biased or prejudiced . The enquiry is not vitiated . The non - examination of one of the Investigating Officers is a plea of desperation . Orders do not suffer from any infirmity . The punishment is not disproportionate . The punishment is to be upheld.
5. Points for consideration are :
( i) Whether the discharge of the petitioner from service with superannuation benefits and without disqualification from future employment is legal and justified ?
(ii) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?
8. Tise learned counsel for the Respondent would argue that the petitioner entertained the belief that he may use bank money in any manner he pleases and he is trying to justify the grave misconduct . He admitted the guilt . The enquiry is not at all improper or unfair . He has no right to use bank money entrusted to him in trust . The learned counsel relied on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the Management of Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal , Madras - 104 and Another ( 1999-2 - LLJ - 210 ) wherein itwas held that " though in cases , where it is warranted , justice may be required to be rendered with mercy , that itself however , is not to be carried to the extent of abandoning of ethical standards reflected in the law on the ground that it is not the function of the Court to be concerned with such moral or ethical standard " . It is further held :
[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
6296
Rewarding the fraudulent and dishonest conduct amounting to grave misconduct by a reinstatement and award of backwages is to mock at the integrity and honesty of vast majority of workmen who are honest , diligent and law abiding . Sympathy cannot be a ground for invalidating the dismissal when such sympathy is totally misplaced and where the acts committed are grave in nature;
Discretionary powers to interfere with quantum of punishment can be exercised only when it is established that proved charges and penalty imposed are not proportionate to each other after considering all aspects ; employee should maintain such ethical standards embodied in rules and regulations . Ethical standards cannot be abandoned on the plea that justice should be rendered with mercy.
the bank business , through his father - in - law a sum of Rs. 50,000 was got and remitted back to the bank and the remaining amount of Rs . 20,000 was remitted on the next day morning in quick succession , throws light to the truth that the petitioner has had arranged with his father - in- law to procure the amount and approach him at the bank to pay over the money to his creditor who has ever been a cause of the greatest vexation to him until the money is paid back. Though it is quite unbecoming of the petitioner to payout to his creditor from bank money the loan amount of Rs . 70,000 and which is certainly a misconduct it has not turned out to be one causing any prejudice to the bank . The bank's reputation is not thereby affected . No bank customer is involved in the transaction . The decision relied on by the learned counsel for the Respondent is not squarely applicable to this case . Here is a misconduct committed. It is a grave misconduct . But is it a misconduct warranting imposition of the severest punishment of discharge from service thereby putting the petitioner into economic death ? The petitioner cannot be found to have done the act in total disregard of all ethical standards . Though sympathy cannot be ground for invalidating the discharge still sympathy has its role in appropriate cases . Where it is warranted justice may be required to be rendered with mercy.
9. The reply to the above argument on behalf of the petitioner is that regard having had to the background scenario in relation to the petitioner of being in hard hit family miseries and financial stress and circumstances owing to the sickness of his child and the thrust upon the petitioner by his creditor to abruptly pay back a loan of Rs . 70,000 and the endless harassment meted out by him even at the place of his employment at the spur of the moment actuated by the momentary aberration of mind he was parting with the bank money in his custody for being paid over to the creditor to pacify and send him away with the fond hope that his father - in - law would be meeting him at the bank with a sum of Rs . 70,000 for gathering which amount the petitioner has had already made arrangement early on the day before his advent at the bank for duty . The situation occurred due to the fact that his father - in- law did not come in time to the bank and was only lately arriving there that too with only an amount of Rs . 50,000 , due to the reason that the pledged ornaments did not fetch a sum of Rs . 70,000 . Remitting the amount back to the bank lately thereafter he was leaving for the day but he did really collect the remainder amount of Rs . 20,000 and arrangedto make good the deficiency of the sum of Rs . 20,000 also in the bank chest the next day . True , at any event the petitioner could not have afforded to adopt such a course in order to satisfy his personal need because by doing so it is an act ofmisuse or abuse of bank money entrusted to him in trust which may fall under the offence of misappropriation of money .
11. In view of the background of the transaction under which the petitioner did the impugned act as unfolded by the petitioner the same could not be found to be an outright and calculated act thereby intending to misappropriate the bank money . Being a Cashier ifwhat he had contemplated was just parting of sum of Rs . 70,000 of the bank money to his vexacious creditor so as to send him away and that the same money could immediately be replaced with the money expected to be collected by his father - in - law through a Pawn Broker and duly brought in time and thus made good the earlier parted bank money it would no longer have been a misuse or abuse of bank money capable of being subsequently noticed . If this was the way of thinking which went through his mind but when the expectation having failed and he having become unsuccessful in his purpose he happened to be detected as a misuser of bank money . Strictly speaking though this is to be regarded as misappropriation of money it should be reckoned as one falling short in degree of the offence of an outright misappropriation . Any acts , right or wrong may have different degrees from the point of view of its gravity and each act of offence , culpable and punishable , has to be dealt with in the light of the degree in which the same is committed. A bank shroff committing misappropriation of a large sum of money to the extent of Rs . 1,00,00,000 in several transactions spreading over an year or more colluding with his associate counterparts similarly employed or otherwise by doing various other misconducts like falsification of accounts , fraud etc. cannot surely be placed on the same footing as that of the petitioner who 10. Though it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that the petitioner acted under a belief or conviction that he could appropriate bank money as he pleases and that it is the propensity to commit such an offence which is punishable there is nothing to show that the petitioner was really actuated by any such malice . As submitted by the petitioner he was making an adjustment which is truly not permitted . The fact that , though after the cash hours of 6297 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
vindictiveness or arbitrariness . If lesser punishment could be inflicted without jeopardizing the interest of the administration , the employer should not inflict the maximum punishment which can prove counterproductive . This appears to be the true ethics of punishment in industrial establishment , which will go a long way in easing unrest between the employee and the employer. Awarding lenient punishment may be a virtue in itself but it can be harmful for smooth functioning of the industry as it could encourage not only the delinquent but others too. In the case on hand, the situation is not so . Lesser a punishment to be meted out to the petitioner in the given facts and circumstances is exceptional . The same cannot be cited as a precedent by any other in the absence of the same or similar circumstances . Each case has to depend on the facts and circumstances peculiar to each . Hence the apprehension of the Management that leniency shown to the petitioner will give room to others to cite the same as a precedent is out ofplace . An out of proportion punishment to the gravity of charge may indicate victimization .
13. In the case of CENTRAL INLAND WATER TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD . VS. BROJONATH (1986-11 - LLJ - 179 ) , the observations of the Supreme Court that follows are relevant to the context " 92- Should then our courts not advance with the times ? Should they still continue to cling to outmoded concepts and outworn ideologies ? Should we not adjust our thinking caps to match the fashion of the day ? Should all jurisprudence development passes by, leaving us floundering in the sloughs of 19th century theories ? Should the strong be permitted to push the weak to the wall ? Should they be allowed to ride roughshod over the weak ? Should the courts sitback and watch supinely while the strong trample under foot the rights of the weak ? We have a constitution for the country. Our judges are bound by their oath to uphold the constitution and the laws . The constitution was encated to secure to all the citizens of the country social and economic justice of the country . Article - 14 of the constitution guarantees to all persons equality before law and equal protection of the laws . The principle deducible from the above discussions on this part of the case is in consonance with right and reason intended to secure sociat and economic justice and conforms to the mandate ofthe great equality clause in Article - 14 " .
has committed an offence which is much less in degree than that of the other one . It cannot be said that in the matter of dispensation of justice the concept of sympathy is totally out of the realm . When circumstances are such that rendition of sympathy is warranted it could well be extended to the deserving person . When sympathy is to be extended to one the question that arises is whether he deserves a sympathy or not . If it is a case where the person deserves the sympathy it has its recognition in Industrial Jurisprudence. In cases where such a sympathy is not called for the said sympathy becomes a misplaced one . it is true that the petitioner's act of parting with bank money supervened for which he has a plausible explanation. Yet , that cannot normally come to the rescue of the petitioner . He has no right to misuse the money entrusted to him in trust . Therefore, he is guilty. Our concern is regarding the punishment . A punishment imposed may become proportionate , or disproportionate to the gravity of the offence . It may also be grossly disproportionate the gravity ofthe offence . Here the punishment extended falls under the third category in the sense that it is shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of the offence . Rather than a court any reasonable or right thinking man hearing about the impugned transaction followed by an overhearing of the explanation rendered by the petitioner , may have the impression that the petitioner need not have been imposed so high a punishment . A Court in a judicial review of the punishment can rather be with the same impression of such a reasonable man to its aid to judge whether the punishment imposed is shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of the offence . It is an instance of a stray lapse from virtue . It isalso the first of any kind of misconduct in the ordinal numeral of misconduct committed by the petitioner . There is no reason for the management to entertain a stand that the bank has lost confidence in him for his continued employment. It is an expression with no supporting material . In fact from the terminology of the punishment it could be seen that it does not affect the eligibility or qualification of the petitioner for future employment. It means that the petitioner is capable of being employed and can be employed elsewhere but he is not to be employed under the Respondent/ Bank. It is good to remember that to err is human; to forgive is divine . It is not in the sense that the petitioner should not be punished for the misconduct but in the sense that while the petitioner is being punished it should be endowed with some element of compassion that he might deserve in the background of his living conditions atthe time of commission of the misconduct .
14. The above observations of the Apex Court are relevant considerations which weighed me in the discussion and I am led to conclude that purishment imposed on the petitioner is not legal and justifieu . He deserves some lesser punishment so that heis not put to economic death during the entirety of his remaining span of life . Therefore , the punishment is liable to be set aside .
15. In the result, the impunged punishment is set aside and the petitioner is ordered to be reinstated into service forthwith with continuity of service and all attendant benefits . The backwages payable is limited to 15% . Forfeiture of the remainder 85 % of the backwages be a 12.One may call to mind that object of punishment is prevention of crime with a double effect of avoiding a recurrence ofthe offence by the same person and preventing others from doing the same . The punishment is to maintain discipline like maintaining discipline in a family of which employer is like a Head of a Family . Idea behind punishment is to correct the fault of the employee by making him more cautious in future and hold out warning to others . While punishing, the employer should not be actuated by malice ,
3484 GI /10-20 6298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
punishment. Apart from this once the petitioner is reinstated into service if on leaving this award intact without being called in question in a higher forum the Respondent is at liberty , if at all they must , to impose a minor punishment of withdrawal of increments with or without cumulative effect asit deems fit , however , not beyond two increments , which by itself would not amount to double punishment since it is judicially settled that punishments awarded for the same offence under two heads separately do not come under the purview of double jeopardy.
16. The reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th August , 2010 )
A.N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer
Witress Examine For the 1st Party/ Petitioner : WW1 , Sri D. Chandrasekhar For the 2nd Party / Management : MWI , Sri T. Venkataramani Documents Marked on the petitioner's side
Ex.No. Date
Description
Ex.WI 06-06-2000 Show Cause Notice issued by Vigilance Department of Respondent Bank to Petitioner
Ex.W2 23-06-2000 Reply by petitioner to Chief Manager of the Respondent/ Bank
Ex.W3 23-10-2000 Intimation to netitioner regarding appointment of Enquiry Officer
Ex.W4 07-11-2000 Letter from Enquiry Officer to the petitioner
Ex .W5 05-05-2001
Letter from Circle Office , Vigilance Department to Petitioner regarding change of EnquiryOfficer
Ex W6 17-08-2001
Letter from Petitioner to Respondent
Ex. W7 30-11-2001
Letter from Petitioner to Respondent enclosing defence summing up LXWE 30-11-2001 Defence Shinming up statement of the petitioner ExW9 05-06-2002 Letter enclosing the findings of Enquiry Officer by Disciplinmey Authority of Respondem of Petitioner EXW10 31-05-2002 Findings of the Enquiry Officer
PART II S Spill 22-06-2002
Ex. W11
Petitioner's co- angels enquiry findings .
Ex .W12 15-07-2002 1 etter from Petitione . Responde
Ex.W13 04-09-2002 Show Cause Notice, n Respondent to Petitioner Ex.W 14 14-09-2002 Reply to the Shoy Carse Notice by Petitioner Fo Respondent
Ex.W15 25-02-2003
n.posing the Order punishment of discharge t service
Ex.W16 03-04-2003 Appeal preferred petitioner before Appli Authority of Respondent Ex.W17 20-07-2003 Letter intimating with enclosures of order dated 15- 07-2005 passed by h Appellate Authority Ex.W18 19-07-2003 Order of the Appeilete Authority
Ex.W19 17-02-2006
Petitioner's Sec.2 -A dise filed Assistant Comassiere ofLabor Central), Cheer Ex.W20 04-09-2006 Romarka filed by Respondent betate Assisi ot Commissioner ot labe Central , Cheama the Fx.W21 18-09-2006 ReplyRejoinder filed by the Petitioner before Assistant Commissioner of Labora entral ) . Chennai
On the Management's side
Ex.No. Date
Descriptioa
Ex.MI
Proceedings of enquiry 23-05-2001 08-06-2001 08-10-2001
Ex.M2 06-06-2000 Report of M/ s Rangana Ramanadall
Ex.M3 05-06-2000
G.A. Branch iciter
Ex.M4 05-06-2000
SR ! Debat Voucher for s 70,000
Ex.MS 05-06-2000
SR.II Credit Voucher for Rs 50,000
EXM6 05-06-2000
SR.11 Credit Voucher for R 20,000
Fx M7 06-06-2000 Letter of K. Chakrapani Ex.M8 06-06-2000 Letter of Petitioner
Ex.M9 06-06-2000 Letter of Petitioner
05-06-2000 Letter of Petitioner
Ex.MII 05-06-2000 Copy Cash Balance Book on 05-06-2000 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड (ii) ]
Ex.M12 23-06-2000 Reply of petitioner to the Show Cause Notice dated 06-06-2000
31-10-2001 Presenting Officer's breif Ex.M12
25-02-2001
Ex.M13
Order( Con/Vig . / AS / 176/ DPC/ 351 / 2002 ) -Discharged from service with superannuation benefits 17-05-2003
Ex.M14
Proceeding of personal hearing before General Manager - I.T.P . ano mollate Authority
06-11-2004
Ex.M15
Proceeding of personal hearing before General Manager ( IED ) Authority ellate नई दिल्ली , 20 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2337.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय-1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 177/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-07-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[संख्या एल -17012/ 6/ 2002 - आई आर ( बी- II ) ] पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 20th August , 2010
S.O. 2337.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 177/ 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 26-7-2010 .
[No. L - 17012/ 6 /2002 - IR ( B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH
CASE ID NO . 177/2002
Shri Ajay Kumar son of Shri Fateh Singh , Resident of Village Rathal ( Hansi ) , Hissar .
6299 APPEARANCES
None
:
For the Workman
Shri Deepak Arora For the Management :
AWARD
Passed on : -13-7-2010
Government of India vide notification no . L - 17012/6 / 2002- ( IR ( B - II ) dated 12th of August , 2002 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( the Act in short ) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal: -
"Whether the action of the management of LIC of India , Karnal in ordering removal of Shri Ajay Kumar , Peon from service w.e.f. 22-1-2001 is just and legal ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2.The case repeatedly called . None is present on behalf of the workman . Workman is also not present. Learned Counsel for the management is present . Workman is not present for his evidence despite knowledge. The case was referred by the Central Govt . in the year 2002 and 8 years old . It appears that workman is non interested to pursue with the present reference . In view of the above , the present reference is returned to the Central Government for want of prosecution . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record room.
Chandigarh: 13-7-2010
G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 20 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2338. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-07-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ संख्या एल-12012/139/97- आई आर ( बी- II ) पार्ट ] पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 20th August , 2010
Applicant
Versus
The Sr. Divisional Manager , LIC of India , 489 - Model Town , Karnal .
Respondent S.O. 2338. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Centrai Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 53/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court- 1, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Punjab & Sindh Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-07-2010.
[No. L - 12012 / 139 / 97 - IR ( B - II ) Pt . ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR, Desk Officer 6300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, -I , CHANDIGARH
CASE ID NO . 53/98
Shri Tarlochan Singh , S / o Shri Ram Singh , Karawal Chowk , H.No. 415 , EA/3 , Dai Wali Gali , Patiala - 147001 .
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] बैंक , नई दिल्ली के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 44/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ संख्या एल -12012/37/ 2009- आई आर ( बी -1 ) ]
रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
Applicant
Versus
The Asstt . General Manager , Punjab & Sindh Bank , Passy Road , Patiala - 147001 .
New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Workman
: None
None
For the Management :
AWARD
Passed on : 6-7-2010
Central Government vide notification no . L - 12012/ 139 /97 - IR ( B - II ) dated 27-02-1998 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab & Sindh Bank in terminating the services of Shri Tarlocham Singh w.e.f. 1-1-1997 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled and from what date ? "
2. The case is taken up for recording the evidence of the parties . Workman is not present . It is the oldest industrial dispute and the reference pending adjudication before this Tribunal . On perusal of the order sheet it is evidently clear that this reference was send back to the Central Government without adjudication on absence of the workman . Thereafter , workman moved an application dated 7-4-2010 for setting aside the order dated 22-10-2009 . Considering the request of the workman and also considering the fact that every industrial dispute and the reference should be tried to be disposed off after affording the opportunity of being heard to both of the parties , this Tribunal was kind enough to afford the opportunity of being heard to the parties vide order dated 7-4-2010 . The workman on 7-4-2010 ensured this Tribunal that he will ensure his presence on every date and shall not cause any delay in adjudication . The workman absented once again , accordingly , I have no option otherwise then to return the reference to the Central Government without adjudication for non - prosecution because of absence of the workman . Central Government be informed . File be consigned .
6-6-2010
G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2339.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट S.O. 2339. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 44/2009 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India , New Delhi and their workman , received by the Central Government on 23-8-2010,
[No. L - 12012/37/2009 - IR ( B - I ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR . R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX , DELHI ID NO . 44/2009
Smt . Sheela Devi w / o Late Shri Satya Prakash , R/ o H.No. 445 , Village & P.O. Bakhatwarpur ,
Delhi- 110036 .
Workman
Versus
TheGeneral Manager ,
State Bank of India & Anr .
Region W , Zonal Office ,
11 , Parliament Street , New Delhi
Management
AWARD
Compassionate appointment was given to Smt . Sheela Devi on 21-12-87 by State Bank of India, for her husband was murdered in 1984 riots . She was subjected to various, transfers by the bank , while in service . Her salary was not fixed in accordance with the Bipartite Settlements . She raised a demand for fixation of her salary in accordance with Bipartite Settlements , which demand was not taken care of by the bank . She approached General Secretary, All India Bank Staff Association for redressal of her grievance . A dispute was raised by the Association in that regard before the Conciliation Officer . During pendency of that dispute , the management took a domestic action against her . Her services were done away by the management , videits order dated 13-4-2007. A dispute was raised before the Conciliation Officer in that regard too . During the pendency of that dispute , Smt . Sheela filed a complaint under Section 33 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act) on 31st of August , 2009 , claiming that action भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
of the bank in terminating her services may be declared illegal and unjustified and bank be directed to reinstate her in services with all consequential benefits .
2. Complaint , moved by Smt . Sheela , was registered as an industrial dispute , notice of which complaint was sent to the bank . She unfolds in her complaint that on 24-1-2006 she raised an industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) highlighting acts of her victimization and harassment by the bank . She also detailed therein the instances of unfair labour practice , when service benefits were denied to her . She was not granted payment of her dues towards salary , increment and other benefits at par with the employees , who were similarly situated . On the said complaint a notice was issued to the bank and conciliation proceedings were initiated . During the course of conciliation proceedings , the bank had illegally removed her from service , vide order dated 13-4-2007 . On 8-6-2007 the Conciliation Officer submitted her failure report before the appropriate Government. On the said failure report , appropriate Government had referred that dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order dated 21 st of September , 2007. Her service conditions were altered to her prejudice , during pendency of conciliation proceedings , which action of the bank is unjustified and illegal . She claims that order dated 13-4-2007 terminating her services may be declared illegal and bank may be directed to reinstate her in services with all consequential benefits .
3. Complaint was resisted by the bank pleading that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint . since no contravention of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act took place . On 13-4-2007 when her services were dismissed , no proceedings were pending before the Conciliation Officer . It has been pleaded that no victimization , harassment or unfair labour practice was meted out to the claimant . It has been claimed that the complaint under reference is not maintainable , hence it may be dismissed.
4. During adjudication process of the complaint. dispute relating to dismissal of Smt . Sheela was raised before the Conciliation Officer . Conciliation proceedings failed in that matter too . Failure report was submitted by the Conciliation Officer before the appropriate Government . Onconsideration of that failure report , the appropriate Government referred that dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No.L - 12012 /37 / 2009 - I.R. (B - I ) , New Delhi dated 23rd of July , 2009 with following terms:
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India , New Delhi in terminating services of Smt . Sheela Devi , Ex- Farash- cum- Water Woman w.e.f. 13-4-2007 , is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief she is entitled to ? "
5. Claimant had tendered her affidavit Ex . W WI /A in support ofher complaint . She was cross examined at length on behalf of the management . Shri S.K.Garg tendered his affidavit Ex.MW1 / A as evidence on behalf ofthe bank. He
6301 was cross examined at length on behalf of the claimant .
6. It would not be out of place to mention that inadvertently evidence of the claimant and Shri S.K.Garg was recorded in the matter , pending adjudication on reference referred above . Parties obtained certified copies of the evidence and filed it in the present proceedings , besides their respective documents . That evidence would be appreciated in the present controversy for its adjudication:
7. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri Ajay Garg . authorised representative . advanced arguments on behalf ofthe claimant . Ms. Kittu Bajaj , authorised representative . raised her submissions on behalf of the bank . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on controversies raised in the complaint are as follows:
8. Section 33 of the Act bars alteration in conditions of service " prejudicial " to the workman concerned in the dispute and punishment of discharge or dismissal when either is connected with pendentelite industrial dispute " save with the permission of the authorities before which the proceedings is pending " or where the discharge or dismissal is for any misconduct not connected with the pendentelite industrial dispute without the " approval of such authority " . Prohibition contained in Section 33 of tlie Act is two fold. On one hand , they are designed to protect the workman concerned during the course of industrial conciliation , arbitration and adjudication , against employers ' harassment and victimization , on account of their having raised the industrial dispute or their continuing the pending proceeding and on the other , they seek to maintain status quo by prescribing management conduct which may give rise to " fresh dispute " which further exacerbate the already strained relations between employer and the workman . Where industrial disputes are pendentelite before an authority mentioned in the section , it was thought necessary that such disputes should be conciliated or adjudicated upon by the authority in a peaceful atmosphere , undisturbed by any subsequent causes for bitterness or unpleasantness . To achieve this object , a ban has been imposed upon the employer exercising his common law . statutory or contractual right to terminate the services of his employees according to contract or the provisions of law governing such service . Theordinary right of the employer to alter the terms of his employees ' services to their prejudice or to terminate their services under the general law governing contract of employment, has been banned subject to certain conditions . Thisban , therefore , is designed to restrict the interference of the general rights and liabilities of the parties under the ordinary law within the limits truly necessary for accomplishing the object of those provisions . Anxiety to know about ban on the right of the employer , persuades me to reproduce the provisions of section 33 of the Act thus :
"33. Conditions of service , etc. , to remain unchanged under certain circumstances during pendency of 6302
PART II S THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
proceedings . ( 1 ) During the pendency of any conciliation proceeding before a conciliation officer or a Board or of any proceeding before an arbitrator or a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal in respect of an industrial dispute . no employer shall .
(a) in regard to any matter connected with the dispute , alter , to the prejudice of the workmen concerned in such dispute , the conditions of service applicable to them immediately before the commencement of such proceeding ; or (b) for any misconduct connected with the dispute . discharge or punish whether by dismissal or otherwise , any workman concerned in such dispute.
Save with the express permission in writing of the authority before which the proceeding is pending.
(2) During the pendency of any such proceeding in respect of an industrial dispute , the employer may. in accordance with standing orders applicable to a workman concerned in such dispute or, where there are no such standing orders , in accordance with the terms of the contract , whether express or implied , between him and the workman-
(a) alter, in regard to any matter not connected with the dispute , the conditions of service applicable to that workman immediately before the commencement of such proceeding ; or (b) for any misconduct not connected with the dispute discharge or punish , whether by dismissal or otherwise , that workman:
Provided that no such workman shall be discharged or dismissed , unless he has been paid wages for one month and an application has been made by the employer to the authority before which the proceeding is pending for approval of the action taken by the employer .
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (2) , no employer shall , during the pendency of any such proceeding in respect of an industrial dispute , take any action against any protected workman concerned in such dispute
(a) by altering , to the prejudice of such protected workman , the conditions of service applicable to him immediately before the commencement of such proceeding; or
(b) by discharging or punishing , whether any dismissal or otherwise , such protected workman , save with the express permission in writing of the authority before which the proceeding is pending .
Explanation . For the purposes of this sub - section , a " protected workman " , in relation to an establishment , means a workman who , being a member of the executive or other office bearer :: registeredde union connected with de establishment , is recognized as such in accordance with rules made in this behalf. ( 4 ) In ev establishment the number of workmen to recognized as protected workmen for the purpost . sub - section ( 3 ) shall be one per cent of the tard number of workmen employed therein subject t .. minimum number of five protected workme co maximum number of one hundred protected werkn and for the aforesaid purpose , the appropri Government may make rules providing for th distribution of such protected work.mtha various trade unions , if any, connec establishment and the manner in which the cor's may be chosen and recognized as protected work .
( 5) Where an employer makes an application to conciliation officer , Board , an arbitrator , Lan.ir Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal under te proviso to sub - sechon ( 2 ) for approval of the ac taken by him . the authority concerned shah , with . delay, hear such application and pass within a of three months om the city of west of application , such order is retorn fit.
Provided that where any such adding consch necessary or expedient so to do , it may , for reasonsda recorded in writing , extend such period by such lotti . period as it may think fii .
Provided further that no proceedings before any such authority shall lapse merely on the ground that period specified in this sub - section had expired witho such proceedings being completed .
9. As noted above sub - sections ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) are designed for different purposes since sub - section applies to the proposition when the employer wants t alter service conditions of the workman to his prejudicem regard to any matter connected with the dispute or for aps misconduct connected with the dispute . in that situate . he is obliged to seek prior permission in writing of the authority before whom the dispute is pending and in a case where the employer wants to alter service conditions of a workman in regard to a matter not connected with the dispute or for any misconduct not connected with the dispute , in that situation he is obliged to seek approval of the order under sub - section ( 2 ) of the aforesaid section . When an employer violates the provisions of sub- section ( 1) or sub - section ( 2 ) of section 33 of the Act . an instant remedy is provided to the workman by the provisions of section 33A of the Act . In other words , where an employer has contravened the provisions of section 33 , the aggrieved workman has been given the option to make a complaint in writing , to the authority before which an industrial dispute is pending , with which the aggrieved workman is 6303 [ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 (1 ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 / भाद्र 27 , 1932
the appropriate Government on 8-6-2007 , which report is Ex.WWI/2 .
12. Shri S.K.Garg swears in his affidavit Ex.MWI / A that no proceedings were pending before the Conciliation Officer on the date when termination order was passed . He had relied orders dated 28-9-2006 , 29-1-2007 and 31-1-2007 passedby the Conciliation Officer on the complaint moved by Smt . Sheela Devi , which are Ex.MWI / I to Ex.MW1/ 3 . However , he does not dispel that Sheela raised dispute before the Conciliation Officer on 24-1-2006 . He projects that conciliation proceedings came to an end on 31-1-2007.
concerned . The com lest of such contravention can be made not to the adjudicating authorities , but to the concihatory authority also . If a complaint is made to a conciliatory authority , viz . a Conciliation Officer or a Board of Conciliation , clause ( a) of section 33 A of the act authorizes a Conciliation Officer or the Board to take such complaint into account in bringing about a settlement of the complained dispute . The Conciliation Officer or the Board is not empowered to adjudicate upon the dispute , which is the area of adjudicatory authorities . When a complaint is made to adjudicatory authority viz . Arbitrator , Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal , it will adjudicate upon the dispute as if it is a dispute referred to or pending before it .
10. To attract the provisions of section 33A of the Act. following conditions precedent are to be satisfied .
! that there should have ben a contravention by the management of the provisions of section 32 of the Act ,
2. that the contrvention should have been during the pendency of the proceedings before the conciliatory authorities or Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal , as the case may be .
3. that the complainant should have been aggrieved by the antrventions and
4. that the application she have been made to The abour Coer of Parat or the National Tribunal in which anemal proceedings are pending.
13. It has to be seen as to whether there was any conti avention of the provisions of section 33 of the Act . Asdetailed above Smt . Sheela had testified that a dispute was raised on her behalf before the Conciliation Officer on 24-1-2006 , since the bank had not fixed her salary in accordance with the Bipartite Settleinent . Complaint Ex . WWW2/ 1 was made by her in that regard . There is no dispute on that account . Shri Garg admits during the course of his cross examination that Smt . Sheela raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer on 24-1-2006 . Thrust of his testimony has been that the said dispute could not be settled and conciliation proceedings came to an end on 31-1-2007 . To substantiate facts in that regard he has proved orders dated 28-9-2006 as well as 31-1-2007 , 1ecorded by the Conciliation Officer , as Ex.MWI and Ex MW1/2 respectively . As per contents of Ex.MW/I , authorised representative of the bank agreed to release 90 % of calculated amount of deficient salary in favour of the claimant within 15 days and balance amount of 10% of her salary was to be released in next 15 days , subject to a decision in that regard by the higher authorities . The matter was adjourned by the Conciliation Officer for 17th ofNovember , 2006. Order dated 31st of January , zou ? has been recorded on a seat on which order dated 29-1-2007 purports to have been recorded . As per order dated 29-1-2007 none was present on behalf of the management and the matter was adjourned for 2-2-2007 . Thereafter proceedings dated 31-1-2007 has been recorded , without mentioning therein as to why matter was taken up on that date . In those proceedings it has been recorded that conciliation proceedings failed . It has been argued by Ms. Bajaj that Ex.MW1 / 2 highlights that conciliation proceedings failed on 31-1-2007 . She urges that on failure of the conciliation proceedings on that date , no proceedings were pending before the Conciliation Officer thereafter . She argued that no proceedings were pending before the Conciliation Officer on 13 th of April , 2007 , when dismissal order of Sheela was passed by the bank . Shri Ajay Garg dispel her submissions and argued that conciliation proceedings remain pending till failure report is received by the appropriate Government . He presents that failure report was submitted by the Conciliation Officer to the appropriate Government on 8th of June , 2006 , which report is Ex .WW1/2 .
Now it would be seen as to whether the claimant could satisfyabove conditions . Smt. Sheela swears in her affidavit that she was appointed by the bank as class IV employee on 21-12-87 . Her basic salary was Rs.815 . She reached basic salary of Rs 2000 per month in 1994. Salary of the award staff was revised as per 6th Bipartite Settlement w.e.f. 1-11-92 . Accordingly her salary was revised and she was filedat basic pay of Rs.2000 , in the scale of Rs . 1600- 3420. Salary of award stafl was again revised as per 7th Bipartite Settlement. She was to be fixed in the scale of Rs.2700-5800 , but the bank deprived her of those benefits . 8th Bipartite Settlement revised salary of subordinate staff w.e.f. 1-11-2002 . She was to be given wages in the scale ofRs.4060-10180 . However , her salary was not fixed in that scale . Whenever she asked for revision of her wages , she was threatened of her dismissal or transfer to a far of piace . She was transferred to various branches of the bank . She made several representations for revision of her wages but to no avail . On 24--1-2006 she raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer through her union . Complaint made in that regard is Ex . WW 1/1 . During the course of Conciliation proceedings , she was illegally removed from service by the bank vide order dated 13-4-2007. The Conciliation Officer submitted her failure report to 6304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
14. Section 20 of the Act makes provision in respect of commencement and conclusion of proceedings before the Conciliation Officer . Sub- section ( 1 ) of the said section contemplates as to when conciliation proceedings commences before a Conciliation Officer in a public utility service . The 1st limb of sub - section ( 1 ) speaks that a conciliation proceeding shall commence on the date on which a notice of strike or lock out , under Section 22 is received by the Conciliation Officer . The second limb of the said sub- section provides that proceedings before a Board shall commence when a reference under sub - section (1 ) of Section 10 is made by the appropriate Government , whether the dispute relates to public utility service or a non public utility service . Sub - section (2 ) of the said section details points of time on which conciliation proceedings before a Conciliation Officer or a Board shall be deemed to have been concluded , which are enumerated thus:
1. In case a settlement is arrived at , whether before a Conciliation Officer or the Board the date on which memorandum of settlement is signed by the parties to the dispute .
2. In case no settlement is arrived at :
( a ) the date on which the report of the Conciliation Officer is received by the appropriate Government or
(b) the date on which report of the Board is published under section 17 ,
3. In case , during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings the dispute is referred for adjudicating the date of reference would be date ofthe conclusion of the conciliation proceedings .
15. Here in the case no settlement was arrived at between the parties , on dispute raised vide Ex . WWI/ 1 . Failure report Ex . WWI / 2 makes it clear that discussions were held on various dates and finally on 31-1-2007 but the dispute could not be resolved . It has been made clear by the Conciliation Officer that conciliation proceedings ended in failure . Failure report was recorded by the Conciliation Officer on 8-6-2007. It was sent to the appropriate Government for consideration . Therefore , it does lie in the mouth of the bank to say that the conciliation proceedings concluded on 31-1-2007 . It is not the date when failure report was recorded but it is the date when the failure report was actually received by the appropriate government on which conciliation proceedings shall be deemed to have been concluded . Dismissal order was passed on 13-4-2007 . Therefore , it is evident that on 13-4-2007 conciliation proceeding were pending before the Conciliation Officer . By way of passing a dismissal order against Smt . Sheela , the management contravened the provisions of Section 33 of the Act . That contravention was during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings before the Conciliation Officer.
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 16. There is no quarrel on the proposition that Smt . Sheela was aggrieved by the contravention of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Since contravention of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act , during pendency of the conciliation proceedings has come over the record , now occasion arises for this Tribunal to embark upon an adjudication of the dispute contained in the complaint under reference . The dispute which was raised by Smt . Sheela before the Conciliation Officer was not connected with the dispute in respect of which her dismissal order was passed. Therefore , the bank was required to move an application for approval of such an action before Conciliation Officer, as provided by the provisions of Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) of the Act. Admittedly no such an application for approval was moved by the bank . Since the dispute , which was pending before the Conciliation Officer at the time of contravention of Section 33 of the Act has been referred to this tribunal for adjudication , hence Smt . Sheela had rightly filed this complaint before this Tribunal , as the original proceedings are pending adjudication before it . The management was under an obligation to make payment of one month notice wages and tile an application for approval of its action of dismissal , as the part of the same transaction . No application for approval was moved.
17. What is the effect of non - moving an application for approval ? Such proposition was taken note of by the Apex Court in Jaipur Zila Sehkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank ( AIR 2002 S.C. 643 ) wherein it was held that it would be clear case of contravention of the proviso to Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) of the Act . It would be expedient to reproduce the law laid in the above precedent , which are extracted thus:
"The proviso to Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) as can be seen from its very unambiguous and clear language , is mandatory . This apart from the object of Section 33 and in the context of the proviso to Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) , it is obvious that the conditions contained in the said proviso are to be essentially complied with . Further any employer who contravenes the provisions of Section 33 invites a punishment under S.31 ( 1 ) with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine which may extend to Rs.1000 or with both . This penal provision is again a pointer of the mandatory nature of the proviso to comply with the conditions stated therein . To put it in other way , the said conditions being mandatory , are to be satisfied if an order of discharge or dismissal passed under Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) is to be operative , if an employer desires to take benefit of the said provision for passing an order of discharge or dismissal of an employee , he has also to take the burden of discharging the statutory obligation placed on him in the said proviso . Taking a contrary view that an order of discharge or dismissal passed by an employer in contravention of the mandatory conditions contained in the proviso does not render [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
such an order inoperative or void , defeats the very purpose of the proviso and it becomes meaningless . It iswell settled rule of interpretation that no part of statute shall be construed as unnecessary or superfluous . The proviso const be diluted or disobeyed by an employer . 1. can not disobey the mandatory provision and then say that dhe order of discharge or dismissal made in contravention of Section 33 (2 ) ( b) is not void er in- perive . He cannot be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong . the interpretation of statute must be such that it should advance the legislative intent and serve the purpose for which it is made rather than to frustrate it. The proviso to Section 33 ( 2 ) (b ) affords protection to a workman to safeguard his interest and it is a shield against victimization and unfair labour practice by the employer during the pendency of industrial dispute when the relationship between them are already strained An employer cannot be permitted to use the provision of Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) to ease out a workman without complying with the conditions contained in the said previso for any alleged misconduct said to be unconnected with the already pending industrial dispute. The protection afforded to a workman under the said provision cannot be taken away. If it is to be held that an order of discharge or dismissal passed by the employer without complying with the requirements of the said proviso is not void or inoperative , the employer may with impunity discharge or dismiss a workman .
18. The Apex Court dealt with the situation of the withdrawal of such approval application or not making an application in the following manner :
" The view that when no application is made or the onemade is withdrawn , there is no order of refusal of such application on merit and as such the order of dismissal or discharge does not become void or inoperative unless such an order is set aside under Section 33A , cannot be accepted . In our view , not making an application under Section 33 ( 2) (b) seeking approval or withdrawing an application once made before any order is made thereon , is a clear case of contravention of the proviso to Section 33 ( 2 )(b ) . An employer who does not make an application under Section 33 ( 2) (b) or withdraws that one made , cannot be rewarded by relieving him of the statutory obligation created on him to make such an application . If it is so done, he will be happier or more comfortable ihan an employer who obeys the command of law and makes an application inviting scrutiny of the authority in the matter of granting approval of the action taken by him . Adherence to and obedience of law should be obvious and necessary in a system governed by rule of law . An employer by design can avoid to make an application after dismissing or 3484GI/10-21
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
6305 discharging an employee or tile it and withdraw before any order is passed on it , on its merits , to take a position that such order is not inoperative or till it is set aside under Section 33A notwithstanding the contravention of Section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) proviso , driving the employee to have recourse to one or more proceeding by making a complaint under Section 33A or to raise another industrial dispute or to make a complaint under Section 31 ( 1 ) . Such an approach destroys the protection specifically and expressly given to an employee under the said proviso as against possible victimization , unfair labour practice or harassment because of pendency of industrial dispute so that an employee can be saved from hardship of unemployment.
19. It is evident that the order of dismissal of Smt . Sheela is void ab initio, since it was passed by the bank in contravention of the provisions of Section 33 (2 ) ( b ) ofthe Act . Smt . Sheela is deemed to be in the service of the bank . However , it cannot be lost sight of that the appropriate Government has referred a dispute in that regard to this Tribunal for adjudication . In the process of adjudication of thatdispute, the Tribunal had taken steps ahead , wherein the bank had pleaded that an enquiry was conducted and order impugned was passed on the basis of findings recorded therein . Since the order was in violation of the provisions of section 33 ( 2 ) ( b ) of the Act , it cannot take effect. In such a situation it is a case of an enquiry which can be said to be defective . Where an enquiry held by an employer is found to be defective , the whole case remains open before the Tribunal and the management may avait an opportunity of adducing evidence before the Tribunal tojustify its action. If such an opportunity is asked for , the Tribunal has no power to refuse in giving of such an opportunity to an employer to adduce evidence to prove misconduct of the employce . It in the interest of the management as well as the employee to enable the Tribunal itself to be satisfied about the alleged misconduct , so that the management may not attempt to embark upon a second enquiry on the same facts . Therefore, in adjudication of the dispute referred to the Tribunal by the appropriate Government , a course would be open to the management to seek an opportunity to adduce evidence to prove misconduct of Smt . Sheela in the matter . In such a situation the findings recorded herein would be subject to outcome of assessment of the evidence , which would be adduced to prove her misconduct .
20. It is settled proposition that there is a distinction between the order which is void and an order which suffers tom irregularities . The order which is void cannot relate back, while the order which suffers from some irregularities may relate back to the date of punishment . The Apex Court anGujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. [ 1980 ( 40 ) F.L.R. 152 ] took note of such a situation , which proposition was reaffirmed in Engineering Laghu Udyog Finployees Union [2004 (100 ) F.L.R. 843 ] . The law so laid is reproduced below:
6306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
"Kalyani was cited to support the view of relation back of the Award to the date of the employer's termination orders . We do not agree that the ratio of Kalyani corroborates the proposition propounded. furisprudentially , approval . is not creative but confirmatory and therefore relates back . A void dismissal is just void and does not exist . If the Tribunal , for the first time , passes an order recording a tinding of misconduct and thus breathes life into the jead shall of the Managersens's order , predating of the nativity does not arise . The reference to Sasa Musa in Kalyani enlightens this position . The latter case of D.C.Roy v. The Presiding Officer , Madhya Pradesh Industrial Court , Indore and others ' supra ) spozitically refors to Kalyani's case and Sasa Musa's case and holds that where the Management discharges a workman by an order which is void for want of an enquiry or for blatait violation of rules of natural justice, the relation- back doctrine cannot be invoked. The jurisprudential difference between a Yold arder , which by a subsequent judicial resuscitation comes into being de novo , and an order, which may suffer from some defects but is not still born or void and all that is needed in the law to make in gond is a subsequent approval by a Tribunal which is granted, cannot be abfuscated.
"When is terms of the provise appended to clause ( b ) of Section 33 of the Act. an approval is sought for and is refused , the order of dismissal becomes void. ifan approval is not obtained still , the order of punishment cannot be given effect to . It is, therefore, not correctto contend that the Tribunal in a reference under Section 10 of the Act , when passes an order recording a finding of misconduct, brings life into thedead. Unfortunately , the Court did not take notice ofthe binding decisions in Motipur Sugar Factory's case ( supra) and Firestone's case ( supra ) " .
21. In view of above discussion it is concluded that order dated 13-04-2007 is non - est since it violates provisions of Section 33 (2 )( b ) of the Act. Smt . Sheela is deemed to be in the service of the management . However , these findings would be subject to out come of adjudication on the dispute referred to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government , in that regard. An award is , accordingly , passed . lt be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dated: 27-7-2010
Dr. R.K. YADAV , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त , 2010 का.आ , 2340, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार चेयरमेन , फेडरल बैंक लि प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय
[ PART II - SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , एरणाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ संख्या एल-12012/135/ 2008 - आई आर ( ची -1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2340. In pursuance of Section 17 of th Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 41 : 2008 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of the chairman . Federal Bank Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010 .
[No. L - 12012 / 135 /2008 - IR (03 -DI RAMESII SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR- COURTOIM Present : Shri P.L. Norbert , B.A .. LI..B .. (Wednesday the 9th day of August , 2011.18 Shravanam , 1932 )
1.D. 41/2008
Workman : Shri B. Jayakumar , Panamthitta , Outhupally P.O. , Kayamkullam. By Adv . Shri C. Anil Kumar.
Management : The Chauman , Federal Bank Limited. Federal Towers , Post Bag No. 103 , Aluva - 683101 By Advs.M/ s/ B.S . Krishnan Associates .
This case coming up for hearing on 3-8-2010, this Tribunal - cum- Labour Court on 9-8-2010 passed the following.
AWARD This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is :
"Whether the action of the management of Federal Bank Limited in dismissing the services of Shri B. Jayakumar , Ex- typist Clerk w.e.f. 02-11-2006 is legal and justified ? " If not , to what relief he is entitled ?
2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : -- Shri . B. Jayakumar was a Typist/ Clerk of Federal Bank in [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6307 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
Devikulangara Branch of Kollam District in 2002. A charge sheet was issued to him alleging fraud and misappropriation of money of customers . A domestic enquiry was conducted , he was found guilty and was dismissed from service . Though he filed an appeal he did not succeed . Hence the dispute .
enquiry , oral and documentary evidence , enquiry report and miscellaneous records . The enquiry files were marked on consent as Exts.MI and MI ( a ) . The workman was defended by an Advocate . Four witoesses were examined . on management side and they were cross examined. The workman has no case that he was not furnished with coples ofdocuments relied on by the management in the enquiry. He was given opportunity to adduce derence evidence. But nobody was examined on defence side . One document was produced and it was marked as Ext. DEI. Both sides were heard before findings were recorded. The workman was given copy of the report and cominents were invited by the Disciplinary Authority before confirming the findings . The workman was given opportunity of caring by the Disciplinary Authority before imposing the punishment. Thus the records reveal that the enquiry was conducted in full compliance with the principles of natural justice . Therefore there is no basis for the allegation regarding irregularity in the procedure or violation of principles of natural justice .
3. According to the workman the explanation given by him to the charge sheet was not properly considered by the disciplinary authority and an enquiry was ordered . There was a criminal compiaint regarding the same incident . In the criminal case after the trial the workman was acquitted by Magistrate Court , Kayamkulam in 2005. However the management proceeded with the domestic enquiry and he was punished. The continuance of domestic enquiry after acquittal is irregular and hence the enquiry is invalid . The Enquiry Officer proceeded with a biased mind . The customers of the bank who were examined in the criminal case were not examined in the enquiry . The enquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice . The findings are not based on materials and are perverse . The management did not take into consideration the past unblemished service of the workman while imposing the punishment . Ever since the suspension in 2002 the workman is not employed anywhere . Hence he prays to set aside the enquiry and reinstate him in service .
4. The management in the written statement contends that the workman was acquitted in the criminal case on the benefit of doubt . The explanation to the charge sheet was not convincing and hence enquiry was ordered . The workman was represented by an Advocate in the enquiry. The management witnesses were cross examined . The defence was given opportunity to adduce defence evidence . However no witnesses were examined , but one document was produced and marked . The enquiry was conducted in strict compliance with the principles of natural justice . Most of the transactions considered and proved in the domestic enquiry were not subject matter of criminal complaint . The charges in both proceedings are distinct , different and independent of each other . There is no illegality in proceeding with the domestic enquiry . The findings are based on evidence . The punishment is proportionate to the gravity of charges . The workman is not entitled for any relief.
5. In the light of the above contentions the following points arise for consideration.
1. Is the enquiry valig ?
2. Are the findings sustainable ?
3. Is the punishment proper?
The evidence consists of Exts.Ml and Ml ( a ) alone .
6. Point No.1 : Though in the claim statement it is contended that the enquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice and opportunity to defend was denied , it was not seriously pursued at the time of adjudication . The enquiry files consist of proceedings of
7. Point No.2 : - Since the validity of enquiry is beyond challenge the scope for attacking the findings of Enquiry Officer is limited. Unless the workman is able to show that there is absolutely no material on record to enter a finding of guilt , he cannot succeed in challenging the findings . So far as the present case is concerned , there is overwhelming evidence to prove the guilt of the workman . Four witnesses were examined and 202 documents were otarked on management side . Most of the documents are statements of account holders given to the Investigating Officer of the bank , pass books , statements of accounts , remittance slips etc. Out of 45 aggrieved customers of the bank 44 customers had lodged written complaints with the bank, The documents unambiguously prove the misconduct of fraud and misappropriation of money of several customers . There are innumerable instances of fraud and misappropriation and the amount involved in the misappropriation comes to Rs . 5,26,550 . Out of this the brother - in - law of the workman and the workman together remitted nearly half of the amount and the balance to be made good is Rs . 2,37,750 . The modus operandi of the workman was that he used to receive money from customers for remittance in their accounts , record the remittance in the pass books , but would not actually remit . Sometimes lesser amounts are shown in bank's records and in some other cases remittances are made subsequently . This mischief went on for quite sometime . In 2002 some of the customers came to understand that the amounts remitted by them were not credited in their accounts by the workman . They complained to the Manager and an investigation was ordered . A senior officer of the bank conducted the investigation , statements of customers were recorded and pass books , remittance slips etc. were collected . A schedulc of remittances , corresponding entry in ledger , exhibits in support of alleged transactions etc. is prepared for easy reference .
6308
[PART 11-- SEC THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
Name of Account Holder
Antoant Remitted
Sl . No.
Date of Remittance (1) (2)
(3)
(5)
(4)
12-4-2002
04-05-2001
3,000
!. Smt . Lekshmikuttyamma
2,000
Nil
Nil
1,000
22-4-2002 29-5-2002
2. Sri . Sadasivan
14,150
Findings of Enquiry Officer
Documents in support of derence
Documents in support ofcharges
Date of Remittance as perledger
(8)
(7)
(6)
DE- I
Misappropriak ME- 38 , 39 , 40 ,
41 & 42
}
Withdrawal
10,000
22-04-2002
2.000
ME -2 , 3 , 4 , 5
&35
Withdrawal
22-03-2002
12-4-2002
15,000 28-03-2002
5,000
30-4-2001 21-6-2001
3. Sint . Jayasree S.
5,000
31-5-2001 22-6-2001
1,500
30-5-2002
27-03-2002 4. Sri . Bhaskaran K.
ME - 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ,
}
10,43,44, 45 & 46
18-4-2002 20-5-2002
14,000
10,000 Nil 5. Sri . M. Radhakrishnan .
05-06-2002
30.000
ME-36, 47 , 48 &49 .
ME - 37,50 ,
51 & 52 .
16-05-2002 05-06-2002
10.000
Sri . Bhaskaran Nair N.
}
17-05-2002 05-06-2002
05-06-2002
11-03-2002 7. Smt . Prabhavathi Bhanu 5,000
8. Smt . T. Prasanna
1,000
ME -53 , 54, 55 & 56 .
ME -57 , 58 , 59 & 60 .
31-12-2001 05-06-2002
05-06-2002
9. Smt . Sobha Anilkumar 1.000
27-03-2002
200
ME- 61 , 62 & 63 .
ME -64 , 65, 67& 68 .
27-03-2002 05-06-2002
10. Akru ( Minor )
05-06-2002
08-04-2002 il . Sri . N. Damodhara Kurup 6,000
21-05-2002
12. Sri . C. J. Jacob
11,000 08-05-2002
19-06-2002
13. Smt . Prasanna R. Nair 5,000
02-04-2002 14. Sri . Sasankan B.
25,000 27.04.2002
2,500
Nil
20-4-2002 15. Stu. Mais M.A.
6,000
5,000
ME - 66 , 69 & 70. "
ME - 71 , 72 ,
73& 74.
ME-75 , 76 & 77.
ME - 78 , 79 ,
80 & 8 !
Not remitted ME- 82, 83 & 84 .
Not remitted ME - 85 , 86,
22-05-2002 Not
Withdrawn
(withdrawn)
25-05-2002
20,000
14-05-2002
2,000
18-03-2002 16. Sri . Vidadharan G.
18-03-2002
3,000
17. Smt . Mony Vidyadharan
06-06-2002
20.000
21-12-2001 18. Sri . Remesan K.
17-6-2002
01-11-2001 19. Sri . Raveendran N.
8,500
08-4-2002 20. Ms. Suvarnakumari J. 5,000
5:7 & 88 .
Not remitted ME - 89,90 & 92 , "
Not remitted ME - 91 & 93 .
ME - 94 , 95 , 96
97 & 98 .
ME- 99 , 100, 101 & 102 .
Not Remitted ME - 104, 105 & 106 .
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
भाग 11 खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(3)
(5) (2)
(4)
6309
(8)
(6)
66
Not Remitted
23-04-2002 2. Smt . B.Vasantha
7,500
24-04-2002
08-04-2002
4,000
22. Sri . P.Podiyan
ME- 107 , 108 & 109 .
ME- 110 , 111 ,
Not remitted
3,800
12-04-2002
41,000
23. Sri . S.Mahendran
112 & 113 .
}
Not remitted
20-05-2002 ME - 114 , 115, 116 & 117.
Not remitted
11-09-2001
5,000
24. Sri . C.1 . Joseph
ME - 118 , 119 & 120 .
Not remitted
10,000 02-05-2002 25 Smt. Suseela Gopalan
ME - 121 , 122 & 123 .
Not remitted
23-03-2002
15,000
26. Smt . Mariamma
09-11-2001 18-06-2002
5,000
27. Sri . P.K. Jayakumar .
22-03-2002 06-04-2002
5,000
28. Sri . K.R. Santhosh .
ME- 124 125 & 126 .
ME - 127 , 128 , 129 & 130
ME- 131 , 132 , 133 &134.
Not remitted
20-05-2002
6,000
29 Si. N.Sasi .
10-04-2002 Not remitted
8,000
30. Sri . S. Balaraman Pillai
ME - 135 , 136 & 137
ME - 138 , 139 & 140.
04-05-2002
21-03-2002
15,000
Ms. Anija Prakash.
31.
ME- 141 , 142 ,
Not remitted
30-03-2002
7,000
143 & 144.
66
66
Notremitted
Nil
6,000
Nil
Not
2,000
Withdrawn
(withdrawn)
Not remitted
2,750 06-04-2002 32. Sri . Ravikishore B
11-05-2002
38,000
Sri . Pankajakshan Pillai
33.
ME - 145 , 146 & 147
Not remitted . ME - 148 , 149 & 150 .
ME- 151,152
19-06-2002
22-04-2002
25,000
Sri . K Ajitkumar
34.
25-06-2002
19-05-2001
10,000
153 , 154
155& 156
23-05-2001
14-05-2001
20,000
23-07-2001
21-05-2001
10,000
5,000
20-05-2002
06-05-2002 35. Ms. Jane Varkey
ME - 157,
Not remitted
20-05-2002
1,000
158 & 159
Not remitted
04-03-2002
8,500
36. Sri . K.G. Sukumara
Kurup
ME - 160, 161 & 162
13-09-2001
13-09-2001
3,000
37. Ms. Sheeja U.
(Rs. 1600
ME - 163 ,
164& 165 .
alone remitted)
Not remitted
500
27-04-2002 38. Simt.Sari Chandran
ME - 166 , 167 & 168
06-04-2002
27-03-2002 39. Sri . Vamadevan
10,000
ME - 169, 170 , 171 & 172
Notremitted
2,000
Nil 40. Sri . V. Rajan
ME - 173 , 174 & 175
Not remitted
08-03-2002
6,000
41. Sri . Nainan David
ME - 176 , 177 & 178
Not remitted
22-02-2002
2,300
Smt. K. Karthiyayini
42.
ME - 179 , 180 & 181 6310
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | (1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8 ) 2,000
43. Smt . Radha Jayadas
Not remitted ME - 182 ,
06-03-2002
183 & 184
44. Smt . J. Radhamma
1,500
Not remitted ME - 185 ,
19-03-2002
186 & 187
26,000
45. Ms. Shailaja Senan
Not remitted
25-05-2002
ME - 188 , 189 & 190
11. Point No. 3 : The punishment imposed is 8. The aforementioned documentary evidence as well as the testimony of MWs . 1 to 4 leave no room for doubt that the workman had committed fraud and misappropriation of money of customers . MWI was Manager ( Admn . ) of Devikulangara Branch from May 2002 to May 2005. MW2 was the Principal Officer of Devikulangara Branch from May 1999 to April 2003. MW3 was in Vigilance Department as Sr. Manager from May 1999 to May 2004. He conducted the investigation . MW4 is the Branch Manager , Devikulangara Branch since May 2004. It is needless to mention that as against the above mentioned clinching evidence ( schedule ) in support of the charges there is no contra evidence except Ext . DE1 judgment in CC 739/2002.
dismissal without notice . It is contended by the workman that the Disciplinary Authority had not taken into consideration the past unblemished service of the workman while imposing the punishment . He is unemployed ever since the suspension and he is in penury. It is to be noted that the instances of misconduct are numerous and the charges are grave . The case of 45 account holders are brought to light in the enquiry . The amount misappropriated comes to the tune of Rs.5,26,550 . Some amounts were remitted by the workman and his brother - in- law to make good the loss . The remaining amount to be remitted comes to Rs . 2,37 , 750. The worker who had joined service in 1980 had gained experience in the banking business and misused his knowledge to commit fraud in respect of so many transactions of so many customers . The faith of the people and the fame of the institution are affected by the conduct of the workman . Honesty and integrity must be the integral part of the life of a bank employee . A bank's asset is its employees ' honesty and good behaviour . The customers feel free to deal with a bank having the above qualities . The faith and trust reposed by the customers are breached when dishonesty and deceipt are deployed in dealing with their money. The management cannot tolerate employees with no integrity. The fact that the workman has no alternate employment cannot be a mitigating circumstance in a case of this nature where grave allegations of a series of fraud and misappropriations are involved . The punishment is commensurate with the gravity of the offence and I find no reason to interfere with the punishment .
In the result an award is passed finding that the action ofthe management in dismissing the workman from service is legal and justified and he is not entitled for any relief.
12. The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .
Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 9th day of August , 2010 .
P.L. NORBERT , Presiding Officer Appendix
Witness for the Workman Nil.
Witness for the Management Nil.
9. A complaint was lodged by the management with the police . After investigation a charge sheet was laid before Judicial Magistrate of the First class, Kayamkulam and was takenon file as CC 739/2002 . After the trial as per judgment dated 21-12-2005 he was acquitted of all the offences . Ext.DE1 is copy of the judgment . According to the learned counsel for the worker , after the acquittal it was not proper or legal for the management to have proceeded with the domestic enquiry . It is to be noted that unless the evidence and issues in both proceedings are identical the finding in the criminal case cannot affect the domestic enquiry . The position is clarified in TNCS Corporation Ltd. V. K. Meerabhai , (2006 ) 2 SCC 255. There are a series of acts in respect of different transactions in different dates . Some of the transactions are subject matter of criminal complaint , but not all. Whereas in the domestic enquiry all transactions are enquired into . Out of 29 witnesses examined in the criminal case PWI and 3 alone are common witnesses both in criminal case and domestic enquiry. Most of the other witnesses in the criminal case are customers whose accounts were meddled with by the workman . Four documents were marked in the criminal case as Exts . Pl to P4 . Out of them only Ext.P3 series relate to alleged transactions . In the domestic enquiry 202 documents were marked as Exts . MEl to 202. Thus it is clear that though the offences in all the transactions are of the same kind criminal complaint pertains only to some of the offences and certain transactions . However in the domestic enquiry all the transactions and incidents were enquired into . Thus the facts , evidence and offences or misconduct involved are not common . Hence the acquittal in the criminal case cannot be a bar in proceeding with the domestic enquiry .
Exhibitfor the Workman Nil .
Exhibits for the management
M1 Enquiry File.
10. There is ample evidence on record to prove the misconduct alleged against the workman . The findings of Enquiry Officer suffer from no lapses or lacuna.
M1(a) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2341.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 319/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011 /158 /2001 - आई आर ( बी- II ) ] पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2341. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 319/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010 .
[No. L - 12011 / 158 /2001 - IR( B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDARA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH
Case No. I. D. No. 319/2001
The President, Punjab National Bank Workers Union (NZ) EG 810 - A , Mohalla Gobindgarh, Jalandhar - 124001
...Applicant
Versus
The Senior Regional Manager , Punjab National Bank, Regional Office , Rohtak - 124001
...Respondent APPEARANCES
None
:
For the Workman
None
For the Management :
AWARD
Passed on : 02-08-2010
Central Government vide notification no . L - 12011 / 158 / 2001 - IR ( B - II ) dated 28-11-2001 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication : ---
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in removing Shri Daya Nand Yadav
6311
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
from service and imposing the penality of recovery of Rs . 53,570 is just and legal ? If not , so , what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
2. The case is taken up for hearing today , No one is present for the parties . It is the oldest industrial dispute and the reference pending adjudication before this Tribunal . since 2001 and already nine years old . On last two dates workman does not ensure his presence . It appears that the workman is not interested inperusing the matter . I have no option otherwise than to return the reference to the Central Government without adjudication for non - prosecution becauase of absence of the workman . Central Governrnent be informed . File be consigned . 02-08-2010
G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त, 2010
का. आ. 2342.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बडौदा , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011/201/99- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
पुष्पेन्दर कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2342.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court - 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010 .
[No. L - 12011 /201 /99 - IR ( B - II ) ] PUSHPENDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX , DELHI ID No. 11/2006
The General Secretary ,
Bank of Baroda Employees Union ,
4824/24 , Ansari Road ,
Daryaganj ,
New Delhi - 110002 ...Workman 6312
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
Versus
The General Manager ,
Bank ofBaroda .
16. Sansad Marg . New Delhi - 110001
[PART II -- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
Management
AWARD
Ex - servicemen are reemployed by Bank of Baroda (hereinafter referred to as the Bank ) as armed guards . Salary received by those ex - servicemen , at the time of their discharge from armed forces , is to be protected while fixing their salary by the bank at the time of re -employment . Their basic pay , dearness allowance , good service / conduct pay, drawn at the time of their discharge from armed forces are to be taken into account while protecting their salary , for the purposes of fixation of their pay by the bank . They are to receive special allowance of Rs . 101 PM , while working as armed guards with the bank.
2. Bank of Baroda Employees Union ( hereinafter referred to as the Union) is registered under the Trade Union Act , 1926. The Union represents majority of employees , working in various branches/ offices of the bank , in Union Territory of Delhi . The members of the Union are clerks , cashiers , peons , armed guards , watchmen and sweepers etc. About 80 armed guards / watchmen are members of the union .
3. Circular dated 7th of November , 86 was issued by the bank , explaining formula to be followed for determination of basic pay of ex - servicemen armed guards . In pursuance of the said circular , pay received by them , at the time of their discharge from armed forces , was protected and their basic pay and dearness allowance was fixed by the bank in such a manner as to protect basic pay , dearness allowance , good service pay and class pay received by them , from the armed forces . Special allowance was paid to them , after protection of their pay as referred above . It was not considered as part of their basic pay , for the purposes of protection of their pay received by them at the time of discharge from armed forces . In January , 1993 instructions were received by the bank from Ministry of Finance , Banking Division , Government of India , New Delhi , to the effect that special allowance forms part of the basic pay and it should be considered while re - fixing pay of armed guards . In compliance of the said circular pay of the armed guards re -employed by the bank , were re - fixed . On re- fixation of their pay . Armed gaurds received lesser emoluments than those which were received by them in pursuance of circular dated 7th of November , 86 .
4. Protest was raised by the armed guards , in respect of their fitment of pay by the Bank in pursuance of circular issued in January , 1993. They demanded withdrawal of the said circular. The Union took up the issue with the bank . When needful was not done , the Union raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer . Since conciliation proceedings failed , failure report was submitted to the appropriate Government by the Conciliation Officer . Vide order dated 25.5.2000 , the appropriate Government dechned to refer dispute for adjudication,
5. A writ petition was filed before High Court of Delhi , assailing order of refusal by the appropriate Government , to make a reference for adjudication . The writ petition was dismissed by the Writ Court Later Patent Appeal No.439 / 2003 was filed , which came to be disposed ofby the Division Bench of the High Court on 19-12-05. In pursuance of missives given by the High Court , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No L - 12011 /201 99 - IR ( B - II ) . New Delhi dated 19th of April , 2006. with followingterms:
"Whether the instructions / guidelines / clarifications issued by the management of Bank of Baroda in the matter of fixation of pay of Ex - servicemen re- employed as armed guards in Public Sector . Banks is justified and legally valid ? Whether the allegations of Bank of Baroda Employees Union that the service conditions of armed guards were altered to their dis - advantage by the management is correct . If so , what relief is the disputants / union concerned is entitled to "" 6. Claim statement was filed by the onion pleading therein that members of the Union composed of the award staff, viz clerks , cashiers , peons , armed guards . Watchmen. sweepers and other categories . They are workmen as defined by the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( in short the Act) . Service conditions of Bank employees are governed by various awards as well as industry leve ! bipartite settlements entered into between the parties . Clause 56 of Ist Bipartite Settlement provides that special allowance is to be paid to certain categories of workmen , to compensate them for performance or discharge of certain additional duties and functions requiring greater skill or responsibilities , over and above routine duties and functions of a workman in the same cadre . A workman is entitled to special allowance so long he is in - charge of such work or performed such duties which attract such allowance . Special allowance by no stretch of imagination , can be considered as basic pay or in the nature of basic pay , since it is payable for performance or discharge of certain additional duties and functions requiring greater skill and responsibilities over and above routine duties of the cadre . Recipient of special allowance may exererse his option to forego special assigned job and special allowance , without any variation of his basic pay . Various armed guards , watchmen and stenographers , employed by the bank, fall in the cadre of award staff.
7. Fitment formula for ex- servicemen , reemploved as armed guard by the bank , was circulated on 4-8-8-4 and 7th ofNovember , 86. In circular dated 7-11-86 it was provided [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
that pay fixation on re - employment of ex - servicemen would be done by protrecting their basic pay plus dearness allowance drawn by them at the time of their release from armed forces . Basic pay plus dearness allowance , with reference to the protection was to be determined , after deducting dearness allowance admissible to bank employees and relevant stage of basic pay was to be ascertained after deducting dearness allowance admissible, from the figure protected . Circular referred above was given effect from 1st of July , 83 and as such armed guards employed on 1st of July , 83 , or thereafter become entitled to benefits flowing from that circular . Special allowance , paid to the armed guards , was not taken into account for arriving at final fitment , for protecting pay last drawn by ex - servicemen , at the time of their discharge from armed forces .
8. On 7th of January , 1993 the bank issued a circular , detailing therein that the fitment formula special allowance would be taken into consideration , while protecting last pay drawn by ex - servicemen armed guards . The bank revised fitment formula , which resulted in reducing existing salary of a large number of ex - servicemen , armed guard ranging from Rs. 400 to Rs . 1000 PM . The circular so issued by the bank , is arbitrary, illegal and bad in law. It had discriminatory effect and violates provisions of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution .
9. Circular dated 7-1-1993 affects change in service conditions of armed guards , to their detriment . No notice , as provided by Section 9 - A of the Act was served upon those armed guards , who were affected by such change of service conditions . The said circular is liable to be discarded on that count too . The circular was given retrospective effect , without any reasons in that regard . Service conditions of the armed guards cannot be altered from a retrospective date . Though it was mentioned by the bank in the circular that it was based on directions of the Government of India , yet those directions were not brought to the notice of the Union . It has been claimed that guidelines /instructions issued by the Bank, vide circular dated 7-1-1993 , may be declared unjustified , illegal and invalid and salary of the armed guards may be restored to the stage at which they were drawing prior to the issuance of the circular under reference .
10. The Bank demurred the claim pleading that the appropriate Government reviewed its order dated 25-5-2000 , without any fresh additional matter for consideration. The reference of the dispute is bad , since no material was available with the appropriate Government for consideration , after it declined to refer the dispute vide order dated 25-5-2000 . Since the dispute was bad, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain it . There was a memorandum of understanding , entered into between the bank and the Union during the conciliation proceedings , hence appropriate Government was not competent to make reference of the dispute , during currency of the period of the said memorandum of understanding . A claim has been 3484 GI /10-22
6313 made that the bank is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution and bound to follow policy decisions and guidelines issued by the Government of India . In circular dated 7-1-93 it was provided that a special allowance paid to armed guards could be treated in the nature of basic pay. Pay fixation of the armed guards who joined service ofthe bank on or after 13-3-92 was to be fixed again by reopening their cases and recovery of excess payment , if any , made to them was to be waived , since fixation of pay of ex- servicemen armed guards was done matter policy decisions and guidelines of the Government of India, which were statutory in nature , hence provisions of Section 9 - A of the Act are not applicable to it . However the stage of conciliation proceedings it was agreed that old wage structure would be restored and thereafter the bank would comply with the provisions of Section 9 -A of the Act . On 28th of May , 1996, the Union requested the bank to defer the matter relating to issuance of notice dated 12/13-4-96 under Section 9 - A of the Act, which request was conceded to . A meeting was held on 20-6-1996 wherein it was requested that issuance of notice may be postponed for a period of 30 days , which request was also conceded to . Thereafter the Union started re - agitating the matter with a view to wriggle out of the agreement dated 4th of April, 1996 , wherein it was agreed that the Bank may serve notice under Section 9 -A of the Act in the matter . The Bank issued notice under Section 9 - A of the Act to the concerned armed guards.
11. The Bank pleads that special allowance is pay which attracts dearness allowance , house rent allowance and also reckoned for payment of all terminal benefits viz . provident fund, pension and leave encashment etc. It has beendenied that recipient of special allowance has a right or option to forego it . Circular dated 7-1-1993 has no retrospective effect . Re - fixation of pay was done in July, 1996, after giving opportunities to the concerned armed guards under Section 9 - A of the Act . Bank simply implemented directives and guidelines of the Government of India. Salary of an employee is always subject to change and modification in terms of awards , settlements and Government guidelines . Claim put forward by the Union is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed .
12. Shri Chand Singh Dahia ( WW1 ) and Shri Ram Kishan (WW2 ) tendered their affidavits , Ex . WWI/A and Ex.WW2 / A respectively, as evidence in the matter . They were cross examined at length on behalf of the management. Shri K. C. Hans tendered his affidavit Ex.MW1 /A as evidence on behalf of the management. He was cross examined at length on behalf of the Union . No other witness was examined by either or the parties .
13. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri C. S. Dahia, authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the Union . Shri K. C. Hans , Senior Manager (HR) , raised his submissions on behalf of the Bank. Written submissions were filed by the parties . I have given my 6314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues inolved in the controversy are as follows:
14. Shri C. S. Dahia swears in his affidavit that service conditions of the bank employees are governed by various awards as well as industrial level bipartite settlements , entered into between the unions and Indian Bankers Associations . Shri Hans affirms that assertion and unfolds that terms and conditions of service of workman category , employed in the bank , are subject to terms of awards popularly known as Sastry Award and Deszi Award , industry level bipartite settlements and bank level bipartite settlements , besides policy decisions , guide'ines and directives issued by the Government to the bank from time to time. There are rules in force in the bank relation to regular recruitment , promotions and wage/ salary fixation ofaward statis. Payment of special allowance is also subject to the said awads and settlements, beside Government directives and policy decisions . Such allowance are payable to the spearted category of workmen , performing duties in addition matine duties , for which they are employed.
15 Provisions of Section 9 -A of the Act were brought on the Starute Book with an object to prevent a unilateral action on the part of the avaployer , changing conditions of service to the prejudice of the workmen . Purpose for enacting this provision is to afford an opportunity to the workmen to consider the effect of proposed change and, if necessary , to present their paint of view on the proposal and such consultation would further serve to stipulate a feeling of common joint interest of the management and workmen in industrial progress and increase productivity . Provisions of Section 9 - A provide for procedure for alteration of conditions of service wit!, respect to matters specified in Fourth Schedule to the Act , when there is no industrial dispute or conciliation proceedings pending . There is no provision in the Act . which may prohibit the management from altering conditions of service after following the procedure prescribed thereunder . What express provisions are to be complied with by the management , to know that it would be expedient to have a glance on provisions of Section 9- / A of the Act , which are extracted thus.-
"9A Notice of change. No employer , who proposes to effect any change in the conditions of service applicable to any workmen in respect of any matter specified in the Fourth Schedule , shall effect such change ,---
(a) without giving to the workmen likely to be affected by such change a notice in the prescribed manner of the nature of the change proposed to be etfected: or
(0 ) within twenty - one days of giving such notice :
Provided that no notice shall be required for effecting ars sech, change
[ PART II- SFC . 3 ( ii ) ] (a) where the change is effected in pursuance of any settlement or award ; or
(b) where the workmen likely to be affected by the change are persons to whom the Fundaniental and Supplementary Rules , Civil Services (Classiffication , Control and Appeal ) Reies , Civil Services ( Temporary Service ) Roles , Revised Leave Rules , Civil Service Regulations , Civilians in Defence Services (Classification . Control and Appeal ) Rules or the Indian Railway Establishment Code or any other rules or regulations that may be notified in this behalf by the appropriate Government in the Official Gazette , apply " .
16. An employer is enjoined to give a novel workmen , in the prescribed manner , when he proposes to effect change in conditions of service applicable to the workmen , in respect of any matter specified in Schedule Four appended to the Act , before effecting such change Rule 34 of the Industrial Disputes ( Central) Rules , 1997 or short the Rules) prescribes that notice as provided to tr ' E' , shall be given to the workmen . Procedare therein to give such a notice . The employer is enjo to effect proposed change within 21 days Provisions of Section 9 - A of the Act went ppt employer proposes to effect changes it and service and not to a case where certam ceudsins of sor become applicable to the employees by ope stat In other words , the change contemplated by this sector one which employer has volition to make or not to make Where an employer is compelled to give effect to aby statutory rule or order which brings about change in terms of employment such change would not fall within the tubit of this section. Reference can be made to the precedent in Hemant Kumar Gupta ( 1982 Lab . 1.C. 1435 ) .
17. Provisio to Section 9 - A dispenses with the requirement of notice made following cases ( a ) where the change is effected pursuant to any settlement or award or (b) where the workman likely to be affected by the change are the persons to whom the following statutory rules apply . ( i) Fundamental and Supplementary Rules , ( ii ) Civil Services (Classification , Control and Appeal ) Roles , fii ) Civil Services ( Temporary Services ) Rules . ( iv ) Revised I eave Rules , ( v) Civil Service Regulations , ( vi ) Civilian in Defence Services ( Classification , Control and Appeal ) Rules . (vn ) Indian Railway Establishment Code or ( viii ) any other rules or regulations that may be notified in this behalf by the appropriate Government in the Official Gazette .
18. As noted above , a notice is dispensed with sway in the case of such persons , who are governed by the rules which are specified hereinabove or " any other ruies or regulations " that may be notified in this behalf by the appropriate Government in the Official Gazette . The proviso cannot be construed to mean that if an employee is [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
governed by the rules other than those mentioned therein , the employer in such a case must give a notice of change before he complies with the statutory rules or orders which has not been made or issued by him . It may , however , be a different matter if the employer himself is the statutory authority to make rules or issue orders relating to conditions of service . In such a situation , it would be expedient on an employer to comply with the provisions of Section 9 -A , unless case is brought within the exceptions contained in the proviso .
other rules or regularisations , which were cutified in thar behalf by the appropriate Government in official garette . No case was projected on behalf of the bank we share that it was under an obligation to cempty with roles or gulations , notified by the appropriate Govemerent in official gazette , relating to service conditions of the awant staff. No case for exemption provided in clause ( b ) of proviso to Section 9 - A of the Act enterge out of facts unfolded by the parties . Policy decisions , guidelines and directives issued from time to time by the Government of India should have been notified in the official garette. touching conditions of service of the awasu raff, to reach the status of exemption provided by clause ( b ) of proviso appended to Section 9 -A of the Act. Any policy decision guideline and directives issued by Government of india to the bank relating to service conditions of the award staff will not exempt the bank from the provisions of Section 9- A of the Act, in case it is not notified in the official gazette, inthat regard. Circular under reference was not notifiedby the Government of India in official gazette , to answer the legislative intent provided by clause ( b ) of the proviso to the aforesaid section . No case has been projected on behalf ofthe bank that the appropriate Government has exempted it from application of the provisions of Section 9 - A , by way of issuance of a notification , as provided by Section 9 -B of the Act . Therefore , it is evident that the Bank cannot bye pass the provisions of Section 9 - A of the Act , in case it proposes to affect any change in conditions of service applicable to its award staff.
19. Whether proviso appended to Section 9 -A of the Actwas attracted in the controversy ? Shri Hans swears that conditions of service of workmen category are subject to terms of awards and settlements popularly known as Sastry Award , Desai Award , industry level bipartite settlement and bank level bipartite settlements , besides policy decisions , guidelines and directives issued by the Government from time to time . Therefore , out of facts unfolded by Shri Hans , it is evident that conditions of service of award staff of the Bank is to be decided on the strength of " collective bargaining " . The Union may raise a demand before the Bank and the parties may negotiate and arrive at a settlement relating to conditions of service of the award staff. It is clear that conditions of service relating to award staff of the Bank are to be settled by way of an agreement between the Bank or Banker's association on one hand and the Union on the other . It is so done with a view to protect award staff as a class against unfair labour practice . Therefore , it is evident that for settlement of conditions of service of an award staff of the bank , the process of " collective bargaining " is adopted . When a settlement is arrived at , by a process of " collective bargaining " , it decides service conditions of award staff of the bank. Consequently it is evident that no case has been projected that circular dated 7th of January , 1993 , was issued in pursuance of any settlement or award relating to service conditions of award staff of the Bank . To bring the case within the extent provided in clause ( a) of the proviso to Section 9 - A , the Bank ought to have produced evidence to this effect that the circular under reference was issued in pursuance of any settlement or award arrived at between the parties , touching their service conditions . Consequently it is not a case which is exempted by clause ( a) of proviso appended to Section 9 -A of the Act .
21. Shri Hans swears in his affidavit Ex.MWI/ A that the Union filed an application before the Conciliation Officer raising an industrial dispate , alleging that conditions of service of armed guards were changed by the bank , without issuing of notice under Section 9 - A of the Act . Reply to the said application was submitted, which reply was annexed with the written statement as annexure ' C' . Onadvice of Conciliation Officer , the bank and the Union arrived at a memorandum of understanding on issue of notice under Section 9 - A , which memorandum of understanding was annexed as annexure " D" to the written statement . In pursuance to the said memorandum of understanding bank issued notice under Section 9 -A of the Act to the concerned employees . During the course of his cross examination he projects that those notices are Ex . WW1 /MI to Ex . WW 1 /M4 . Notices were sent to armed guards in 1996 and their salaries were reduced w.e.f. January , 1993. However , he hastens to add that no recovery wasmade in respect of the salary , which was already paid to them.
20. No case has been projected by Shri Hans to the effect that rules enlisted in clause (b ) of proviso appended to Section 9 - A were governing service conditions of the armed guards employed by the bank , Though he asserts in hisaffidavit that there are well defined rules for regulating recruitment , promotions and wage/ salary fixation of the award staff in the bank , yet , he admits during the course of his cross examination that award staff is governed by bipartite settlements in the matter of their service conditions . Hence , Shri Hans negates the proposition that service conditions of award staff of the Bank are governed by any
22. Shri Chand Kishan Dahia concedes during the course ofhis cross exmination that during pendency of the dispute before the Conciliaton Officer and understanding was arrived at between the management and the union , copy ofwhich understanding is Ex . WW1 / M1 . It was agreed between the parties that the bank shall restor salary of the 6316
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
armed guards to original position and thereafter notice under section 9 - A of the Act would be served on concerned workmen . Notice issued to the workmen are Ex . WW 1 /M2 to Ex . WWI /M4 . He claims that these notices are not under Section 9 - A of the Act . Shri Ram Kishan is silent on issues relating to service of a notice under section 9 - A of the Act on him .
23. When facts testified by rival parties are appreciated , it came to light that memorandum of understanding, was arrived at between the parties on 4-4-1996 , during the course of conciliation proceedings . When Ex . WW1 /MI was perused , It came to light that the Conciliation Officer recorded facts to the effect that main issue raised before him by the union was that while effecting change in wage structure of armed guards by way of re- fixation on lower side , notice under section 9 - A of the Act ought to have been given . He takes note of item 1 of Fourth Schedule appended to the Act and asserts that for effecting change in conditions of service in wages , indicating the period and mode of payment , a notice is required to be given under section 9 - A of the Act . On his suggestion management agreed to comply with the proivisions of section 9 - A of the Act and restore old wage structure and to effect change, only after issuance of a statutory notice . Thefore . it is evident that the dispute raised before the Conciliation Officer was withdrawn by the Union in pursuance of the said memorandum of understanding . arrived at between the parties . It is not a matter of dispute that in pursuance of the said memorandum of understanding oid wage structure was restored and issue raised before thé Conciliation Officer was not agitated any further .
24. As testified by the parties notice Ex . WWI/ M2 , Ex. WWI/M3 and Ex . WW1 /M4 were served on Satpal Singh , Dharam Singh Daral and Mahender Singh . The bank claims that these notices were served under section 9 A of the Act, while the Union asserts that they were not within the ambit of the said section . Therefore , it becomes expedient to ascertain as to whether the aforesaid notices were in compliance to the requirement of Section 9 -A of the Act. For an answer it is necessary to perse contents of those notices . Notice Ex . WW1 / M2 . served on Satpal Singh runs as follows:
[PART II-- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] You would be aware that in the month of November , 93 you , have been given the salary as per following details:---
Salary for the month of November , 93
Rs. 1280/-
1. Basic Pay
2. D.A.
Rs . 1425 / - ( this includes DA on special allowance )
Rs. 75
3. CCA
Rs.166
4. HRA
Rs . 101
5. Special Allowance
Rs . 33
6. Washing Allowance
7. Τ.Α. Α .
Rs. 0 Rs . 100
Gross Emoluments
Further we may advis that the Bank of Baroda Employees Union , Delhi hast ken up your case before the Regional Labour Commissionen..al ) , New Delhi for compliance of Section A of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The re - fixation of your sol ry was done to comply with the guidelines issued by the dark which has the approval of Banking Division , Ministry of Finance , Government of India , through Indian Banks Association .
The position as exists do not attract compliances of Sec . 9 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947; however , at the suggestions of the Conciliation Authority, it was agreed to comply with the Section 9 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and to restore the old wage structure . After compliance of the Section 9 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ; the effect of change shall continue in terms of the Bank's guidelines as aforesaid about re - fixation of your salary . In other words the re- fixation of salary already done shall be effected .
To comply with Section 9 ( A ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , you shall draw your salary for the month of April , 1996 , as under:
Rs.2720
1. Basic
Rs. 194
2. Spl . Allow.
Rs . 122
3. CCA
Rs . 350
4. HRA
5. D.A.
Date 12-04-96
"RO/ DC R / II / STF / 96
Mr. Sat Pal Singh .
EC No.61202 , Sub - Staff cadre ( Armed Guard ) , Bank ofBaroda , Bhogal Branch , New Delhi . Dear Sir, Re: Your Salary Fixation .
Wewrite to inform you that your salary was refixed in terms of the guidelines issued by the bank.
Rs . 1081 / - ( DA on special allowances included)
Rs . 33
6. Washing Allow .
Rs . 135
7. P.D.A.
Rs . 4655
Gross
Yours faithfully, Sd/-
Asstt. Gen. Manager " 25. The Fourth Schedule , appended to the Act , make it clear that the notice under section 9 - A is required only in भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/ भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
case ofproposed change in conditions of service , in respect of any matter specified in it . As commanded by the legislature , no employer shall effect any change in conditions of service applicable to any workman , without giving him a notice in the prescribed manner of the nature ofthe change proposed to be effected . Therefore , it would be in the fitness of the things to know as to what is the manner prescribed for service of such a notice . For an answer we have to take notice of the provisions of rule 34 of the Rules , which are extracted thus :
"34. Notice of change.- Any employer intending to effect any change in the conditions of service applicable to any workman in respect of any matter specified in the Fourth Schedule to the Act shall give notice of such intention in Form E. The notice shall be displayed conspicuously by the employer on a notice board at the main entrance to the establishment in the Manager's Office ;
Provided that where any registered trade union ofworkmen exists , a copy of the notice shall also be served by registered post on the secretary of such union .
26. Form ' E ' prescribes the form of notice , which is also reproduced thus :
FORM E (see rule 34)
Notice of Change of Service Condition Proposed by an Employer
Name of employer .
Address .
Dated the .
day of . 20
In accordance with section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 I / we hereby give notice to all concerned that it is my/ our intention to that the change / changes specified in the annexure , with effect from....... .... of the conditions of service applicable to workmen in respect of the matters specified in the fourth Schedule to the said Act.
Signature.
Designation .
ANNEXURE
(Here specify the change / changes , intended to be effected) Copy forwarded to:
( 1 ) The Secretary of registered trade union , if any;
(2) Assistant Labour Commissioner
(Central) ...........
..( here enter office address of the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) in the local area concerned;
6317 (3) Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central) ...........
Zone;
(4) Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ), New Delhi .
27. As projected above a notice of an intention to effect change in conditions of service , applicable to a workman in respect of any matters specified in the Fourth Schedule , shall be served by the employer by way of displaying such notice conspicuously on a notice board at the main entrance to the establishment in the Manager's Office and where a registered Trade Union exists , a copy of notice shall be served by registered post on the Secretary of such union . It is not the case of the Bank that the notice Ex. WW1 /M2 to Ex . WW1 /M4 were displayed conspicuously on a notice board atthe main entrance of the establishment and a copy ofthose notices were sent to the Secretary of the Union by way of registered post . Service of notice under section 9 - A of the Act shall be effected by way of procedure prescribed above . No other any manner of service is available to the employer when he intends to effect change in conditions of service applicable to any workman . in respect of matters specified in the Fourth Schedule to the Act . Here in the case notices were sent personally to three workmen . It was not displayed conspicuously at the notice board on the main entrance of the establishment of the management nor sent to the Secretary ofthe Union.
28.Why such mode of service was provided by rule 34 ofthe Rules ? Answer is simple . As noticed above the object ofthe Act is to protect workman against victimization by the employer and ensure termination of industrial dispute in a peaceful manner . The Act however , does not provide for any set of social and economic principles for adjustment of conflicting interests . Such norms have been evolved and devised by indutrial adjudication , keeping in view the social and economic conditions , the needs of the workmen , the requirement of the industry , social justice , relative interests of the parties and common good . These norms have given rights to the industrial employees what may be called industrial rights , as such rights may not be available at common law. Disputes as to the conditions of employment can be resolved by resorting to a technique known as " collective bargaining" . This tool is resorted to between an employer or group of employers and a bonafide labour union . Policy behind this is to protect workmen as a class against unfair labour practices .
29. The manner prescribed for service of a notice under section 9 - A of the Act highlights that the legislature was of the view that such notices may be brought to the notice of the workmen as a class so that they may resort to the method of collective bargaining " on issues relating to conditions of their service , in which a change is intended to be effected by the employer . Collective bargaining , being the order of the day, in democratic social welfare state the employer has been saddled with a duty to serve a notice under section 9 - A 6318
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] of the Act in such a manner so that the workmen may resort to tool of " collective bargaining " to sort out the issues , in respect of which a change is intended to be effected. When notices were served personally on three workmen , without displaying it conspicuously on notice board at main entrance of the establishment and without sending a copy of it to the Secretary ofthe Union by registered post, the Bank attempted to put those workmen in isolation . By not serving notice in the manner prescribed , the Bank tried to disassociate three workmen from the other workman as a class or from their registered union . Class of workmen , who ought to have been served with notice under section 9 - A of the Act, furnishes real nexus between the issues and the parties , in respect of which the change was intended to be effected by the bank . Therefore , it is clear that the notices referred above were neither intended to be served nor served in a manner prescribed by the Rules . Consequently , I am constrained to conclude that the bank had failed to comply with the provisions of section 9 - A of the Act and rule 34 of the Rules , when it attempted to give a notice of its intention to effect change in wage structure of armed guards . Without service of notice under section 9 -A of the Act, the bank was not competent to effect change in conditions of service relating to wage structure of ex - servicemen armed guards .
30. Circular Ex . MW1 / 1 was issued by Assistant General Manager of the Bank . In the said circular , it has been projected that certain clarifications were issued by Indian Bank Association regarding terms of special allowance , while arriving at pay fixation of ex - servicmen re -employed in the bank . Those clarifications are as follows:
" In terms of extending instructions , pay of fixation of ex - servicemen appointed in bank, is done on the basis of protection of pay plus dearness allowance drawn by them at the time of their release from Armed Forces . The basic pay fixed in the banks plus dearness allowance thereon should be the same or slightly higher than the amount of protected pay;
TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance ( Banking Division) desired that it be clarified to all the banks that it would be necessary to ensure that the basic pay plus dearness allowance , the special allowance for armed guards /watchemen are taken into account while protecting the last drawn basic pay and dearness allowance thereon at the time of retirement/discharge from the service ofarmed forces as the special allowance is in the nature of basic pay .
circular Ex . MW 1 / land effect recovey , if any, as applicable . Therefore , it is evidence that the above circular intends to efffect change in wage structure of ex - servicemen armed guards employed by the Bank. Shri Ram Kishan had proved hisappointment letter as MW1 / 1 wherein he was told that his starting salary was Rs . 815 besides dearnesss allowance and other allowances as admissible under Fifth Bipartite Settlement . He was also reformed that special allowance of Rs. 101 PM would be paid for the period when he would be employed as an armed guard , perform duties specified for that post and would be armed with a fire arm . It was stipulated therein that the special allowance would be discontinued from the date he seizes to perform specified duties of armed guard and would be relieved of the firearm . Therefore , contract of service , entered into between Shri Ram Kishan and the bank , on the strength of Ex . WW2/ 1 highlight that besides basic pay , dearness allowance and other allowances admissible under Fifth Bipartite Settlement, he would be paid a sum of Rs . 101 PM as special allowance till he performs specified duties of an armed guard and not relieved of the firearm . It is an admitted case of the parties that pay ( basic pay , dearness allowance , good service pay and class pay ) received by Shri Ram Kishan at the time of his discharge from the Indian Army was to be protected by the bank while fixing his pay . For fixation of his pay basic pay plus dearness allowance admissible to the bank employees was to be taken into consideration and relevant stage of basic pay was to be determined after deducing dearness allowance admissible to bank employees , from the figure of pay to be protected. In arriving at the basic pay , which was to be protected , the special allowance was not to be taken note of as per Ex . WW2/ 1 . This remained the position till circular Ex . MW 1 / 1 was issued . As noted above guidelines /instructions/ clarificatios issued by Ministry of Finance , Banking Division , Government of India , were neither notified in official gazette by the appropriate Government as contemplated by clause (b ) of the proviso to section 9 - A of the Act nor the bank was exempted from the provisions ofSection 9 - A by the appropriate Government by way of notification in official gazette , under the provisions of section 9 - B of the Act . Therefore , the circular Ex . MW1/ 1 , on the strength of which special allowance was to be considered as part of the pay affects conditions of service of ex -servicemen armed guards relating to their wage structure , to their detriment . Instructions contained in circular Ex. MW1 / 1 were given effect to in violation ofthe provisions of Section 9 - A of the Act , hence action of the management cannot be termed as legal or justified . Issue raised in proposition No. lof the term of reference is answered against the bank .
The protection as above ( i.e.with special allowance component) would also be relevant if the ex - servicemen are recruited as stenographers or at some other allowance carrying position in clerical subordinate grades ."
31. All Regional /Zonal Authorities were advised to reopen past cases , where ex - servicemen were recruited at special allowance carrying post , and to arrange for re - fixation oftheir basic pay in terms of above guidelines contained , in
32. Shri K.C. Hans admits that in pursuance of circular Ex . MW1 / 1 salaries of armed guards were re - fixed and decreased. He highlights that fitment formula , contained in Government guidelines , was taken into account for re- fixation of salary of armed guards . For that purpose special [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
allowance was treated as basic pay while re - fixing wages ofthe armed guards . Circular Ex. MW1 / 1 applied to a section of armed guard only , deposes Shri Hans , Shri Chand Singh Dahia projects in his affidavit Ex WW1 / A that revised fitment formula resulted in reduction of salary of a large number of ex - servicemen armed guard ranging from Rs . 400/ -to 1000 / - pm . Shri Ram Kishan unfolds that at the time of his appointment his salary was fixed at Rs . 815/ - besides gun allowance . Later on his salary was fixed at Rs . 1050/ - besides gun allowance of Rs . 101 / -w.e.f. 6-3-1990 . In 1993 , on the strength of circular Ex . MW1 / 1 his salary was refixed at Rs . 1050 / - which was fixed by the bank in March , 1990. He was brought down by three stages . Therefore , the evidence brought over the record by the parties is consistent on the issue . The evidence so brought , highlights that service conditions of armed guards were altered to their disadvantage by the bank on the basis of the circular referred above . Proposition No. 2 raised in the terms of reference is answered accordingly .
33. As held above the management was under an obligation to serve notice under Section 9 - A of the Act , in the prescribed manner , before effecting change in the wage structure of ex - servicemen armed guard . No notice in the prescribed manner was served on ex - servicemen armed guards , which fact denounces legality and validity of the action of the management . The terms of the reference can be answereds on these propositions alone . However , the issues raised by the parties to the effect as to whether " special allowance " forms part of the basic pay , requires considerations . For an answer to this proposition , one has to consider as to what is pay . Pay is money paid to an employee for services tendered by him . Money given in recompense or return for work, determined by pay grade and length of service , is commonly known as pay of a post . As per rule 9 ( 21 ) of the Fundamental Rules " pay " means the amount drawn monthly by a Goverment servant as - ( i ) the pay, other than special pay or pay granted in view of his personal qualifications , which has been sanctioned for a post by him substantively or in any an officiating capacity , or to which he is entitledby reason of his position in a cadre ; and
( ii ) overseas pay, special pay and personal pay, and ( iii ) any other emolurnents which may be specially classed as pay by the President .
Rule 9 (23 ) speaks as to what personal pay means . It defines , " personal pay " to mean additional pay granted to a Government servant-
(a ) to save him from loss of substantive pay in respect of a permanent post other than a tenure post due to a revision of pay or to any reduction of such substantive pay otherwise than as a disciplinary measure ; or
(b) in exceptional circumstances , on other personal considerations .
6319
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
Special pay has been defined by rule (9 ) (25 ) . It details, special pay means an addition , of the nature of pay , to the emoluments of a post of a Government servant , granted in consideration of -( a) the specially arduous nature of duties ; or( b ) a specified addition to the work or responsibility .
Substantive pay has been defind by rule 9 ( 28 ) as , the pay other than special pay , personal pay or emoluments classed as pay by the President under rule 9 (21 ) ( a) ( iii ) , to which a Government servant is entitled on account of a post to which he has been appointed substantively or by reason of his subtantive position in cadre .
Therefore, definition of the special pay makes it clear that it is granted to a government servant in consideration of special arduous nature of duties or a specific addition to the work or responsibility . Sometimes special pay is granted onaccount of unhealthiness of the locality in which work/ duties are performed.
34. Clause 6 of 8th Bipartite Settlement dated 2nd of June , 2005 defines pay for the purpose of dearness allowance , house rent allowance and superannuation benefits as basic pay , stagnation increments , special pay , graduation pay , professional qualification pay and officiating pay , if any . Clause II of the said Bipartite Settlement makes provisions for special pay as : ( i ) the special pay payable to the clerical staff of subordinate staff in banks other than State Bank of India , shall be as mentiond in Part I in Schedule II to the said Settlement ; ( ii ) the duties and responsibilities as improved of retained as they are and attracting special pay in banks other than State Bank of India shall be as set out in Schedule III and shall be in partial modificaion of schedule III to the Bipartite Settlement dated 17th September , 1984 and 14th February , 1995; ( iii ) posts attracting special pay as listed in Schedule II to the Bipartite Settlement dated 27th March , 2000 and which do not find a mention in Part - A of Schedule II to this Settlement shall stand discontinued : ( iv) in all other aspects , the general rules and provision contained in Chapter V of theBipartite Settlement dated 19th October , 1966 relating to special pay carrying posts , as modified from time to time , shall continue to apply ; (v ) graduation pay and professional qualification pay payble to the clerical staff in banks shall be as mentioned in Part ' C ' of Schedule II to this Settlement ; ( vi ) the special pay , graduation pay and professional qualification pay as mentioned in Schedule II shall rank for superannuation benefits . ( vii ) the rates of special pay and the duties of special pay carrying posts for workmen staff in State Bank of India may be reviewed and settled at the bank level .
35. Provisions are made for grant of graduation pay or professional qualification pay , even at the stage when an employee had reached maxima of the scale of pay . Various posts and duties are enlisted which entitles an employee for grant of special pay . Armed grards , required to perform watch and ward duties , will get special pay , in case they carry ( i ) gun , pistol or any other fire arm ( ii ) dagger , sword , khuqri or spear ( iii) any other licensed 6320
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
weapon . Retainer peons . ( other than watchmen ) whose names are registered in banks on license as retainers , when they perform armed guard duties would be entitled to special pay as available to armed guards pro rata . Therefore , the provisions of bipartite settlement make it clear that there are certain posts which carry special pay and certain categories of employees get special pay if they are required to perform arduous or specialized duties . Armed guard is one of the category who perform arduous duties and is entitled to special pay . When retainer peon perform armed guard duty, he was special pay. It is evident that special pay in the category of armed guard is granted when he perfrom arduous duty and carries weapon with him. In case he does not carry weapon with him , he is not entitled to special pay.
36. Special pay granted to an armed guard can be withdrawn in case he does not carry out arduous duties or a weapon with him. Therefore , the special pay so granted depends on performance of arduous duties or when he carries a weapon with him . Special pay or allowance , granted on performance of arduous duties , specific addition ofwork or on account of unhealthiness of locality in which duties an performed, cannot be termed in the nature of the basic pay . The instructions so issued by the Government of India cannot be termed as legal , since itviolates provisions of Bipartite Settlement, without following the procedure contained in Section 9A and 19 of the Act. 37. A settlement shall be binding upon the parties for such period as is agreed upon or for a period of six months from the day on which the memorandum of settlement is signed by the parties and shall continue to be binding on the parties after expiry of the period referred above , until expiry of two months from the date on which a notice is writing of an intention to terminate the settlement is given by one of the parties to the other party to the settlement ; enacts sub - section (2) of Section 19 ofthe Act . Thus there are three stages with different legal effects on the life of a settlement . There is a specific period contractually or statutorily fixed as the period of operation . Afterexpiry of statutorily fixed period, settlement does not cease to be effective . But it continuous to be binding on parties until notice has been given by one of the parties of its intention to terminate it and two months have not elapsed from the date of such notice . This is the second stage . The last stage is arrived atwhen period of notice , under sub- section (2 ) of Section 19 of the Act , expires . After this the settlement ceases to be binding under the Act
38. No steps were taken by the bank to terminate the settlement arrived at in the form of Bipartite Settlement, referred above . Provisions of settlement , relating to grant of special pay to bank staff, still govern their service conditions . Steps to change those service conditions , in violation of the provisions of section 9A of the Act , can not be upheld. Therefore , the circular , on the strength of which bank intends to modify wage structure of armed guard to the detriment cannot termed justified or legal .
39. In view of the foregoing discussions ex- servicemen armed guards are entitled to be restored to the
[PART 11 SEC . 3 ( ii) | pay which they were receiving before issuance of the circular under reference . Claim put forward by the union is found to be legal and justified . Action of the management in re - fixing their pay on the basic of the reducedfitment formula is neither justified nor legal . The bank is commanded to restore pay of the armed guards at the stage on which they would have received their pay in case circular dated 7-1-1993 would not have been in existence . An award is accordingly passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dated: 16-7-2010
Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2343.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इण्डियन ग्रासलैंड एण्ड फोडर रिसर्च इंस्टिट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 97/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[संख्या एल-42012/ 106/2000 - आई आर (डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो,अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2343. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 97/2000 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cuin Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Grassland & Fodder Research Institute and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010.
[No. L-42012/106 /2000- IR ( DU ) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH , HJS PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, KANPUR Industrial Dispute No. 97 of 2000
In the matter of dispute between- Sh . Ram Narain son of Sri Kishan Lal , Vill . Padari , Post Bhajala , District Jhansi . And Director, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Instt. Gwalior Road, Jhansi .
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
AWARD
1. Central Government , MOL New Delhi , vide notificaion no. L- 42012 / 106/2000 IR (DU ) dated 29-08-2000 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal-
2. Whether the action of the management of Indian Grassland & Fodder Research Institute Jhansi in terminating the services of their workman Sh . Ram Narain son of Sh . Kishan Lal Ex - Semi skilled workerw.e.f. 21-10-94 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ?
3.Brief facts are claimant had alleged that he was appointed in Indian Grass Land and Fodder Research Institute Jhansi on 08-07-89 as a semi skilled electrician and he continued to work till 31-12-94 . During this period the management has created artificial break , so that the workman may not claim nis valid and legal rights . It is stated that the opposite party has committed the breach of section 25F as they have not given any notice or notice pay or retrenchment compensation and without following the provisions they have terrninated the services of the claimant . It is stated that during conciliation proceedings opposite party has stated that the claimant has worked in the month ofNovember 94 for 22 days and in the month of December 1994 for ten days , but the opposite party has stated before the conciliation officer the date of termination as 21-10-94 , considering this fact that the reference has been sent presuming the date as 21-10-94 . Opposite party is an industry . Opposite has terminated his service with mala- fide intention . Therefore , prayed that the order of the opposite party terminating his services is bad and he should be reinstated in service and the consequential benefits be provided to him.
4. Opposite party has filed a written statement contradicting the aversions of the claimant . It is stated that the claimant was engaged for specific work of a temporary requirement and his temporary engagement ceased to exist after the completion of temporary requirement . Claimant very well new all this at the time of temporary engagement and had verbally agreed to it . Therefore, this is neither a termination by way of punishment and it is not covered under retrenchment as given in section 2(00) of the Act. It is stated that the opposite party is neither a factory nor an industrial unit , it is registered under the Societies Registration Act , therefore , it is not an industry there is no industrial dispute .
3484 Gl/10-23
6321 It is stated that no cause of action has arisen on the date as mentioned in the reference order. It is stated that the dispute has been raised after a long period and central government should not have sent the reference . Central Government has taken decision in other matters where the delay was long not to send the reference . Opposite party has filed certain annexure in this respect i.e. Annexure 1 and 2. It is stated that the reference is barred by the principle of res- judicta, as the claimant has filed a writ petition in the Hon'ble Hight Court , wherein the Hon'ble High Court passed an order that all the parties should approach before the Central Administrative Tribunal but the claimant did not approach the CAT and this Hon'ble Tribunal does not have any jurisdiction . It is stated that the claimant has not completed continuous service as defined under section 25B of the Act . Itis stated that the claimant had worked for 120 days in 1989, 108 days in 1990, 116 days in 1991 , 156 in 1992, 170 in 1993 and 79 days in 1994. Thus he has not worked 7 or 240 days or more in any year . As the claimant had worked for 22 days in November 1994 and ten days in December 1994 so no cause of action arises on 21-10-94 . It is also stated that no seniority list is maintained for muster roll , daily labour and casual labour . Thus it is stated that the opposite party has not committed any breach of section 251G and H of the Act or any other provisions therefore , the reference order is bad in law and it is prayed that it is liable to be dismissed 5. Claimant has also filed rejoinder against the reply of the opposite party wherein nothing new has been alleged by him except reiterating the facts already pleaded by him in his statement of claim.
6. Claimant has not produced any oral or documentary evidence despite repeated notice. He did not appear at the time of arguments also .
7. I have heard the arguments of the opposite party.
8. Opposite party has produced oral as well as documemary evidence .
9. Opposite party had produced two witnesses Sri Munna Lal MWI and Dr. H.S.Shaima as MW2. Both these witnesses have stated on oath that the opposite party is an institute registered under Society Registration Act . When there was a temporary requirement they have taken the work from the ciaimant as Daily paid labour. This work was not of permanent nature but time bound as sanctioned by government of India and the 6322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
labour is paid on the daily basis . It is stated that the claimant had not worked for a single day right from Jan 94 to July 94. It is argued that the claimant had worked for 26 days in August 94 , for 12 days in September 94 , for 08 days in October 94 , for 22 days in November 94 and for 10days in December 1994. It is stated that he has not worked for 240 days , in the previous year since the date of termination i.e. 21-10-94. They have brought the original muster roll and filed the photocopy also but on their request originals have been returned.
10. It is contended that it was the duty of the claimant to prove the aversions of the claim statement but he has not appeared in the witness box. Claimant has not produced any oral or documentary evidence. I agree with the contention of the Opposhe party. It is stated that no cause of action has arisen on 21-10-94 as the claiment has also worked in the month of Noveitour and December 1994 , therefore , evidence and contention adduced by the opposite party appears to be believable and there is ne reason to disbelieve . Claimant has pot wate any crus examination of the aforesaid witnesses .
11. Therefore, in iny view ronsblering the whole evidence the claimant has imserably failedto discharge his batden He has totally failed to prove his case. Therefore , reference is decided against the claimant and in favour of the opposite party .
RAM PARKASH, Presiding Officer Dated 13-08-10
नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त 2010 का.आ. 2344 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.। नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 18/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[संख्या एल-42012/69/ 2008 - आई आर ( डी.यू. ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 23rd August , 2010
5.0. 2344. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governantent hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 18/2009 ) ofthe Cemned Gusamment Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Induris . Dispute between the employers in relation to the
[PART II- SEC. 30 management of C.P.W. D. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010 .
[No. L -42012/69 / 2008 - IKA ) JOHAN TOPNO , Underv
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELW I.D.No. 18/2009
Smt . Santosh Devi rep./through CPWD Mazdoor Union Room No. 95 , Barracks No. 1/10 , Jam Nagar House, Shahjahan Road , New Delhi - 110011 .
Worl
Versus
The Director General of Works , CPWD , Nirman Bhawan , New Delhi -110001 .
Man
AWARD
Santosh Devi , a part time employee. and . : : services in ' J' Division Central Public W (hereinafter referred to as the management ) October , 86 till 4th of April 2007 Sheuadr clean four rooms with an area of 80 sq.mars , by spetta hardly an hour in a day . Her services were dispensed u when requirement to engage became to an end Sherated a demand for reinstatement of her services Men need لسا was not done , a dispute was raised on her behail beton the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation procedings failed , the appropriate Government referred the disq me so this Tribunal for adjudication vide order No.1. - 420164 2008 - IR ( DU ) , New Delhi , dated 18th of February , 2009, with following terins : -
"Whether the action of the management of ( PWD terminating the services of the workman Simi , Santosh Devi w.e.f. 4-4-2007 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
2. Claim statement was filed by the workneang leading that she was working as part time sweeper at Sab Division 3 , J. Division of the management since 1-10 So on hand receipt basis . On completion of four years service she was to be treated as daily rated worker for all parposes . including her regularization as well as her wages , a't ha services were to be regularized . Her husband, name !, Shri Vijender Singh raised a dispute against the managemeta in respect of illegal termination of his services . The dispute was answered in his favour by this Tribunal , vide award dated 31-1-2007 . He was reinstated in service with 40 ° of back wages . The said award has been challenged by the management before High Court of Delhi . It irked the [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
=
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
6323
muster rolls workers and not to part time employees. The Apex Court in Uma Devi case has ruled that temporary o casual employee is not entitled for regularisation of his/her services , in case his / her appointment was not made in consonance with recruitment rules . Since claimant was engaged without her name being sponsored by aaployntent exchange , she is neither entitled for continuance of her service nor regularization on the job . Her claim is liable to be dismissed .
5. Onpleadings of the parties , following issues were settled: -
management and her services were terminated by Shri Narinder Pal , Assistant Engineer on 4-4-2007 . His action is arbitrary, illegal and unjusitfied , besides being unfair labour practice . She had rendered continuous service of more than 240 days in every calendar year . No notice or pay in lieu thereof was given , besides payment of retrenchment compensation . Hundreds of juniors to her are still working with the management . Action of the management is violative of the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( in short the Act) . Their action is also violative of the provisions of section 25-G and 25- H of the Act .
1. Whether the workman , who was engaged as peri time employee , does not fall within the ambit of definition contained in section 2( s ) of the LD . Act ?
2. As in terms of reference ?
3.Relief.
3. It has been claimed that the managerment failed to follow procedure contained in OM No. 6/ 5 /68 - Estt . (D) dated 5th of July , 1968 , in the matter of her regularization . Smt . Maya Devi a part time sweeper working with the management was regularized . Action of the management non regularization of her services is discriminatory . In 1993 , 8982 posts were created for regularization of various categories of daily rated employees , wherein there were 61 posts of sweepers . A post was available for regularisation ofher service . Non regularization of her services amounts to an illegal Act, violative of the principle of natural justice . It has been pleaded that since termination of her services she is unemployed . She seeks reinstatement with continuity and full back wages , besides regularization of her service .
6. Claimant has tendered her affidavit Ex.WWI / A as evidence . She was cross examined at length on behalf of the management . Shri B.K. Prasad also tendered his affidavit Ex . WW2/ A as evidence , on behalf of the claimant . He too was cross examined at length on behalf of the management. Shri Sawant Ram , Executive Engineer , tendered his affidavit Ex. MWI / A as evidence on behalf of the management . He was cross examined at length on behalf of the workman . No other witness was examined by either of the parties.
7. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri B.K. Prasad, authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the workman . Ms. Meenakshi Aggarwal , authorised representative , raised her submissions on behalf of the management . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advance at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :-
Issue No. 1 .
8. Shri Sawant Ranı swears in affidavit Ex . MWI /A that as admitted by the workman , she was engaged as part time sweeper by the management . She was doing part time job for around one hour only , since she used to sweep and clean four rooms of about 80 sq . mtrs . She was engaged by the management as and when exigency required . There was no supervision and control on her . She never worked full time on daily wage nor on muster roll .
4. Her claim was resisted on behalf of the management pleading that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the parties . The management projects that as per her own admission , the claimant was engaged as part time sweeper . She used to do dry sweeping and cleaning in respect of four rooms of about 80 sq . mtrs . She used to spent around one hour in that work. There was no supervision and control on her work. She never worked full time on daily wage basis nor on muster roll . Therefore , she cannot claim a status of workman as defind under the Act . It has been pleaded that part time casual labours are eligible for appointment to class IV posts borne on regular establishment , which are required to be filled by dirct recruitment , provided that they are appointed through employment exchange . The claimant did not fulfil the prescribed criteria for her appointment to class IV post , since she was appointed as part time employee directly , without any reference to employment exchange . It has been denied that her services were dispensed with on account of factum of dispute raised be her husband . It has been pleaded that her services were disengaged when there was no necessity to continue her engagement . Since she was engaged on part time basis , there was no question of serving notice or making payment for notice period . No seniority was maintained in respect of part time sweeper , hence her assertion that juniors to her were retained is not based on any foundation . Her claim that she was entitled for retrenchment compensation , is without merits . O.M. dated 30-9-93 pertain to daily rated
9. Smt . Santosh Devi swears in his affidavit Ex . WW2/ A that she was engaged as sweeper for whole day from 8 AM to 4 PM . She projects that she was designated as part time sweeper in ' J ' Division , where she performed her duty w.e.f. 1-10-86 on hand receipt basis . During the course of her cross examination she evaded the question as to what her wage was on 1-10-86 . She asserts that she was not aware as to what " part time " sweeper means . She opted not to explain dimension of the area which she used to sweep . She admits that intially she was paid wages at 6324
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
Rs . 100 pm . till 1988 and thereafter she was paid @ Rs . 200/ - PM .
10. Shri B.K. Prasad unfolds that Smt . Santosh Devi was working with the management from 8 AM to 4 PM. However , he admits that she was designated as part time sweeper, while doing work under sub division III . ' J ' division of the management . She was preforming her duty w.e.f. 1-10-86 on hand receipt basis . He announces that on completion of four years of her service , she was to be treated as daily rated worker for all purposes including regularization of her service and equal pay for equal work , in the mininum of time scale . During the course of his cross examination , he concedes that a full time employee is not paid Rs . 100 /- per month as his wages . However , he adds that payment of Rs . 100 /- PM to Smt . Santosh Devi v as her exploitation as well as unfair labour practice on the part of the management .
11. Rival facts testified by the parties bring it over the record that Smt . Santosh Devi was engaged on 1st of October , 86. Facts projected by Sawant Ram highlight that Smt . Santosh Devi used to sweep four rooms comprising area of 80 sq . mtrs . only . He asserts that she used to perform her duties hardly for an hour a day . These undisputed facts bring it over the record that Sint.Santosh Devi was employed on part time basis by the management . Though Smt . Santosh Devi and Shri B.K. Parsad claim that she was performing her duties from 8 AM to 4PM. yet it is not disputed by them that till 1988 Smt . Santosh Devi was paid Rs . 100 PM and thereafter she was paid @ Rs . 200 /-PM . They admit that Smt . Santosh Devi was designated as a part time employer . Shri Parsad projects inat after 4 years of service, Smt. Santosh Devi was to be arcated as daily rated worker for all purpose . Therefore , out of these facts , it is implicit that the claimant and Shri Prasad could not dispel that Smt . Santosh Devi was appointed as a part time sweeper . She used to perform duties hardly for an hour in a day, since only four rooms were to be swept by iner . Consequently it is crystal clear that Smt . Santosh was appointed as a part time sweeper and she never performed whole timeduty.
12. Whether a part time employee answers all attributes of a workman , as defined in clause ( s) of section 2 of the Act . For an answer it would be expedient to have glance on the definition . For convenience sake definition of " workman " is reproduced thus .
"( s ) "workman " means any person ( including an apprentice ) employed in any industry to do any manual , unskilled . skilled , technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward , whether the terms of employment be express or implied , and for the purpose of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed , discharged or retrenched in connection with , or as a consequence of , that dispute or whose dismissal ,
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute ,but does not include any such person-
( i ) who is subject to the Air force Act , 1950 (45 of 1945) or the Army Act , 1950 (46 of 1950 ) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957 ) ; or
(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or ( iii ) who is employed mainly in a mangerial or adminstrative capacity ; or
(iv) whe , being employed in a supervisory capacity, drawn wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or exercise , either by the nature of the duties attached tothe office or by reason of the powers vested in him , functions mainly of a managerial nature" .
13. Definition of workman contains three limbs . First limb of the definition gives statutory meaning of the word and determines a workman ay terence to a person (including an apprentice ) employed to industry to do any manual , unskilled , skilled , tech ical, onerative , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward. The second limb is designed to include a person-(i) who have been dismissed , discharged or retrenched in connection with an industrial dispute , or ( ii ) whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment in connection with an industrial dispute , or ( iii ) whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has led to an industrial dispute , within the ambit of workman . However the third part of the definition excludes the categories of persons specified in clause ( i) to ( iv) from the expresson "workman" . The definition does not state that a person , in order to be a workman should have been employed in a substantive capacity or on temporary basis in the first instance or after he is found suitable for the job after a period of probation . In other words , every person employed in an Industry irrespective of his status- temporary , permanent or probationary - would be a workman . The expression " employed " has at least two known connotations , that is , a relationship brought by express or implied contract of service in which employee renders service for which he is engaged by the employer.d the latter agrees to pay him in cash or kind , as agreed between them or statutorily provided . It discloses a relationship of command and obedience . Reference can be made to the precedent in Food Corporaton of India's case 1985 ( 2 ) LL.14) .
14. In Shivnandan Sharma [ 1955 ( 1 ) LL.J. 688 ] , the Apex Court for the first time laid down the crucial test of supervision and control for determining the relationship of employer and employee . In Dharangadhara Chemical Woks Limited [ 1957 ( 1 ) LLJ . 477 ] , the Apex Court ruled that test of " supervision and control may be taken as the prima facie test for determining the relationship of employment " . It was futher laid that existance of the right in the master to supervise and controal the work to be done by the servant , not only matter of directing that work the servant is to do 6325 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
=
which was amply satisfied to announce that those piece rated workers were the workman for the establishment . The Court concluded that the proposition that " piece rate " itself indicates relationship of independent contract , is not correct . A servant who has full liberty to attend to his work according to his pleasure and not according to orders of his master , is an independent contractor . A gold smith engaged to finish jewels a within a given time and when is was open to such goldsmith to finish jewels within the given time or earlier and engage themselves or others of their own held to be independent contractors , in K. Keswa Reddiar [ 1957 ( 1 ) LLJ 645 ] . In the like manner a goldsmith who undertook the manufacture of ornanments like other goldsmith which he was asked to manufacuture and was entitled to receive remuneration which would depend upon the nature of the work done , was held to be not under the order or control of the proprietor of the concern for whom he was doing the work, in Achuta Achar [ 1968 ( 1 ) LLJ 500 ] . An agreement for selling milk on commission was held to be a contract for service and not a contract of service , in Abad Dairy Doodh Vitran Kendra Sanchalak Mandal , Ahmedabad ( 1989 Lab . I.C. 1770 ) . The Tiny Deposit Agents employed in deposit mobilization activity of the bank have been held to be falling within the definition of the workman and not an independent contractor in the precedent in the Management of Indian Bank [ 1990 ( 1 ) LLJ 50 ] .
16. The employer exercises factors of supervision and control , exercises his right to remove or not to give work to him, as an element of control and supervision on a part time employee . Therefore , factor, determinant of his status is the work in which he is employed , besides right of control and supervision in the master . His designation as part time employee nowhere restricts the employer to have power of controlling his work whether he remains in continuous service of his employer , would not be guided by his designation . The Apex Court was confronted with such a proposition in A. Sankaralingam (2008 X A.D. S.C. 689 ) , wherein Catena of decision were noted down .
but also the manner in which he shall do his work is the prima facie test for determining the existence of master and servant relationship. It was suggested that correct method of approach , would be to consider whether having regard to the nature of work there was due control and supervision by the employer . The greater amount of direct control exercised over the person rendering the services by the person contracting for them, the stronger the ground for holding it to be a contract of service . The control and supervision test was reaffirmed by the Apex Court in Chintaman Rao [ 1958 ( 1 ) LLJ 252 ] , wherein it was ruled that "worker " was a person employed by the management and there must be contract of service and a relationship of master and servant between them . In Shankar Balaji Waje [1962 ( 1 ) LLJ 119 ] , the Apex Court clarified that " control " of the management , which is a necessary element of the relationship of master and servant is not directed towards providing or dictating the nature of the article to be produced or the work to be done , but refers to the other incidents having a bearing on the process of work the person carries out in the execution of the work . The manner of work is to be distinguished from the type of work to be performed. In V.P. Gopala Rao [ 1970 ( 11 ) LLJ 59 ] , the Apex Court said that it is the qestion of fact in each case whether the relationship of master and servant exists between the management and the workman and there is no abstract a priori test of the work control required for esatblishing the contract of service . It was laid therein that for holding that the person employed in the factory were workers within the meaning of sub section ( 1 ) of section (2 ) of the Factories Act , it is to be considered that the fact that the workman had to work in the factory implied certain amount of provision by the management and the nature and extent of control varied in different industries and that when the operation was of a simple nature , the control could be exercised at the end of the day of the method of rejecting the bid is which did not come up to the proper standard . It is , therefore , not surprising that in recent years , the control test , as traditionally formulated , has not been treated as an exclusive test . In Silver Jublee Tailoring House [ 1973 ( 11 ) LLJ 495 ] the Apex Court ordained that " it is in its application to skilled and particularly , professional work that control test in its traditional form has really broken down . It has been said that in interpreting that "control " as meaning the power to direct how the servant should do the work , the court has been applying the concept
suited to a past age " .
17. The Court ruled that a bare perusal of the definition of " workman " and " continuous service " would reveal that their applicability is not limited to only full time employees but all that required is that the workman claiming " continuous service " must fulfil specific conditions amongst others laid down in the two provisions so as to seek shelter of section 25-F . If was concluded that the question as to whether a part time workman would be covered within the definition of section 2 ( s ) of the Act and whether he would be entitled to the benefit of " continuous service " under Section 25 - B and the benefit of section 25 - F is to be answered in favour of the workman . Relying the law so laid it is announced that a part time employee would be a workman , in case he answers attributes of a servant and employer exercises his right of control and spurevision on him.
18. Smt . Santosh Devi claims that she worked with the management as a part time sweeper . She was performing her 15. During the last three decades emphasis in the fieled has shifted and no longer rests so strongly upon the question of control . Control is obviously an important factor and in many cases it may still be a decessive factor , but it would be wrong to say that in every case it is decessive factor. In Shining Tailors [ 1983 ( 11 ) LLJ 143 ] , the Apex Court held that the piece rated workers working for a big tailoring establishment were workmen for the establishment . It was observed therein that the " right of removal of the workman or not to give work as an element of control and supervision " 6326
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii )]
Departments concerned for output and productivity so that the work being done by the casual workers could be entrusted to the regular employees . The Departments may also review the norms of staff for regular work and take steps to get them revised , if considered necessary .
(iv) Where the nature of work entrusted to the casual workers and regular employees is the same the casual workers may be paid at the rate of 1 / 30th of the pay at the minimum of the relevant pay scale plusdearness allowance for work of 8 hours a day.
(v) In cases where the work done by a casual worker is different from the work done by a regular employee , the casual worker may be paid only the minimum wages notified by the State Government/ Union Territory Administration , as per the Minimum Wages Act , 1948. However , if a Department is already paying daily wages at a higher rate , the practice could be continued with the approval of its Financial Adviser .
(vi ) The casual workers may be given one paid weekly off after six days continous work .
(vii) The payment to the casual workers may be restricted only to the days on which they actually perform duty under the Government with a paid weekly off as mentioned at ( vi ) above . They will , however , in addition , be paid for a National Holiday , if it falls on a working day for the casual workers .
(viii) In cases where it is not possible to entrust all the items of work now being handled by the casual workers to the existing regular saff, additional regular posts may be created to the barest minimum necessary , with the concurrence of the Ministry ofFinance.
work under the control and supervision of the management . Shri Sawant Ram projects that since she was working for a period of one hour a day , she was not perforing her duties under control and supervision of the management . His thrust of contention has been that Smt . Santosh Devi used to sweep four rooms consisting of an area of 80 sq . mtrs . There was no element of control and supervision over her work . To exercise control and supervision over an employee , the employer should have a right to prescribe the end of the work besides the means as how that work to be performed , retaining a power to control the work. No evidence worth name was put forward by Sawant Ram to the effect that the management never prescribed the end of work besides the means as to how it was to be performed . Undoubtedly sweeping job is such which leaves a little discretion in the means as to how it is to be performed . But the employer may ask the employee to sweep a particular room first that too by use of a broom or a duster . Such commands , if given by an employer , projects that the employer provided the means as to how the work is to be performed, besides the end of the work . Therefore , control and supervision was exercised by themanagement over the work of Smt . Santosh Devi , though she performed that work for a very short span of the day . Herperformance of work for a fraction of the day would not denued status of the workman , when the employer could exercise amount of direct control over her work and conduct . Considering all these aspects , I am constrained to hold that no evidence was brought forward by Sawant Ram to project that there was lack of control and supervision on the part to the management , over the work performed by Smt . Santosh Devi . Therefore , the fact that she was engaged as a part time employee would not push her to a padestral where status of a workman would be taken away from her . Considering all these proposition , it is concluded that despite the fact that the claimant was part time employee , yet she was clothed with all attributes of a workman , within the ambit of clause (s) of section 2 of the Act . Issue is , therefore answered in favour of the claimant and against the management .
Issue No. 2 .
(ix) Where work of more than one type is to be perfomed through out the year but each type of work does not justify a seperate regular employee , amultifunctional post may be created by handling those items of work with the concurrence of the Ministry of Finance .
19. Admittedly the claimant was engaged as a part time sweeper by the management w.e.f. 1-10-86 . When the Apex Court handed down its position in Surinder Singhs casefollowing guidelines were laid in the matter of recruitment of casual labours on daily wage basis .
( i) Persons on daily wages should not be recruited for work of regular nature.
(x) The regularization of the services of the casual workers , will continue to be governed by the instructions issued by this Department in this regard . While considering such regularization , a casual worker may be given relaxation in the upper age- limit only if at the time of ionitial recruitment as a casual worker , he had not crossed the upper age- limit for the relevant post .
(ii) Recruitment of daily wages may be made only for work which is of casual or seasonal or intermittent nature or for work which is not of full time nature , for which regular posts cannot be created.
( iii) The work presently being done by regular staff should be re - assessed by the Administrative
(xi) If a Department wants to make any departure from the above guidelines , it should obtain the prior concurrence of the Minstry of Finance and the Department of Personnel and Training .
6327 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
20. Ministry ofHome Affairs had laid down guidelines for appointment of part time casual labours to regular establishment in O.M. No. 16/5 / 68-Estt . ( D) dated 5-7-1968 which are as follows:
Subject : - Appointment of part time casual labour to regular establishment .
deduct from their actual age the period spent by them as part - time casual labourer and if, after deducting , this period , they are within the maximum age limit prescribed for the service or post in the regular establishment , they should be considered eligible in respect of maximum age . Broken periods of service rendered as part- time casual labourer will also be taken into account for the purpose of age relaxation for appointment to the regular establishment , provided that one stretch of such service is for more than six months .
3. Ministry of Finance etc. are requested to bring these instructions to the notice of their attached and subordinate offices .
Sd/
(Harish Chandra )
Under Secretary to the Govt . of India . " As the Ministry of Finance are aware , casual labourers who have rendered a minimum period of two years " continuous service can be appointed to Class IV posts , borne on regular establishment which are required to be filled by direct recruitment , subject to certain conditions vide para 2 of this Ministry's Office Memorandum No. 16-10-66- Estt . ( D) , dated 2nd December , 1966. A question has been raised as to whether casual labourers appointed on part - time basis should also be made eligible for appointment to Class IV posts borne on regular establishment which are required to be filled by direct recruitment . It has been represented that , in certain offices , casual labourers are employed for a number of years on part - time basis , the work load there being not such as to justify their employment on whole time basis . It has accordingly been decided that casual labourers appointed on part- time basis may also be made eligible for the concession sanctioned in para 2 , of the aforesaid OfficeMemorandum No.16-10-66 - Estt . (D) , dated 2- 12-1966 . Accordingly , with effect from the date of the issue of this Office Memorandum , part- time casual labourers shall also be eligible for appointment to Class IV posts borne on the regular establishment, which are required to be filled by direct recruitment , provided they were appointed through Employment Exchange and had acquired experience of a minimum of four years continuous service as part - time casual labour in the office / establishment to which they were appointed through Employment Exchange . Those part - time casual labourers who were recruited in an office / establishment direct ,, without reference to the Employment Exchange and who are working on the date of issue of this Office Memorandum should not be considered for appointment to the regular establishment , unless they ( i ) get themselves registered with the Employment Exchange ( ii ) render from the date of such registration a minimum of four years continuous service as part- time casual labour and ( iii ) are subsequently sponsored by the Employment Exchange in accordance with their position in the register of the Exchange .
21. As instructed by the Ministry of Home Affairs case of a part - time employee would not be considered to regular establisment unless he ( i ) gets himself registered with the employment exchange ( ii ) rendered from the date of such registration a minimum 4 years continuous service as part time casual employee , and ( iii ) he is subsequently sponsored by the employment exchange in accordance with his position in the register of the exchange. Therefore , for regularization of her service , Smt . Santosh Devi has to fulfil the aforesaid three conditions . In her affidavit Ex.WWI / A she creates a vacuum to the effect that her name was registered with the employment exchange and thereafter she rendered continuous service as a part time employee for a period of 4 years and her name was sponsored by the employment exchange , in accordance with the position of her seniority in a register of the exchnage . When she was subjected to cross examination she projects that she got her name registered with the employment exchange ten years ago . She stood the test of cross examination on 15-1-2010 . Therefore , out of facts unfolded by her it may be presumed that she got her name registered with the employment exchange in the year 2000. However , no specific date , month and year of such registration was spelled by the lady . Facts unfolded by Santosh Devi are not substantiated by any documentary evidence . Assuming those facts to be correct , even in those circumstances it is to be shown by her that her name was sponsored by the employment exchange in accordance with the position of her seniority in the register of the exchange . Therefore , without positive evidence on those issues , it cannot be said that Smt . Santosh Devi could fulfil criteria laid down in O.M.No. 16/ 5 /68 - Estt ( D ) dated 5-7-68 for appointment to regular establishment , from the position ofpart time employee .
2. The orders contained in this Ministry's Office Memoranda No. 4/9/61 Estt ( D ) , dated 9th August , 1961 and 16th September , 1961 , granting certain age , concession to casual labourers in the matter of appointment to posts borne on regular establishment will be applicable also to part - time casual labourers . In other words , such labourers should be allowed to
22. To counter facts projected by Santosh Devi , Shri SawantRam in his affidavit Ex.MWI / A testified that name of a part time employee is to be considered for appointment 6328
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
to class IV posts on regular establishment , which are required to be filled by direct recruitment , provided that part time employee was appointed through employment exchange . He projects that the claimant did not fulfil that criteria for her appointment to class IV post . In her cross examination Smt . Santosh Devi concedes that she was called by Jr. Engineer to join a job , since she was known to him. Therefore , facts projected by Shri Sawant Ram are reaffirmed by her admission . It stood established that name ofSmt . Santosh Devi was not sponsored by the employment exchange , neither at the time of her appointment nor after she got her name registered with the employment excliange . Consequently the managerment could show that Smt . Santosh Devi did not fulfil the criteria laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum for her appointment to group 'D'post.
23. Shri B. K. Prasad swears in his affidavit Ex . WW2/ A that Smt . Maya Devi , a part time sweeper was regularized by the management while Smt . Santosh Devi was discriminated in that matter . To prove that proposition the claimant had confronted Shri Sawant Ram with documents Ex.MWI/ W6 to Ex.MWI/WII . When these documents were perused , it came to light that on the strength of those documents Smt . Sajno was appointed as part time sweeper by the management . However , she was appointed , when her name was sponsored by the employment exchange , on following the procedure for recruitment to that post . She faced an interview board and on being selected she got herself medically examined . When found suitable for the job she was offered a part time appointment . As noted above Smt . Sajno falls in a distinct and different category than the claimant .
24. Ex . WW2 / 5 was relied by the claimant to project that Smt . Maya Devi , a part time sweeper , was appointed against a group ' D' post . When this document was scanned , it came to light that in the case of Maya Devi , guidelines laid inO.M.No. 16/ 5 / 68 - Estt ( D ) dated 5-7-68 were followed . The management considered case of Maya Devi on those standards and thereafter she was regularized against a group'D ' post . It emerges over the record that Smt . Maya Devi got her name registered with the employment exchange , rendered four years service thereafter and her name was sponsored by the employment exchange . Smt . Maya Devi stood on a different and distinct footing than the claimant . Claimant could not point out as to when her name was registered with the employment exchange and when her name was sponsored by the exchange for appointment against a group ' D ' post . Consequently she was not on the same pedastral on which Maya Devi stood in the inatter of her regularization from part time sweeper to a group ' D ' post.
25. Equality before law and equal protection of laws are fundamental rights of every person , ordains Article 14 of the Constitution . The guiding principles laid in Article 14 are that persons , who are similarly situated , shall be
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] treated alike both in privileges conferred and liability imposed , which means that amongst equals the law should be equal and should be equally administered and that like should be treated a like . Article 16 of the Constitution guarantees equality of opportunities for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State. What is guaranteed is the equality of opportunity. Like all other employers , government is also entitled to pick and choose from amongst a large number ofcandidates offering themselves for employment . But the selection process must not be arbitrary . The guarantee given by clause ( a) of Article 16 of the Constitution will cover (a) initial appointments ( b ) promotions ( c) termination ofemployment ( d) and matters relating to salary , periodical increments , leaves , gratuity , pension , age of superannuation etc. Matters relating to employment or appointments include all mattes in relations to employment both prior and subsequent to the employment which are incidental to the employment and form part of the terms and conditions of such employment .
26. Fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 14 forbids class legislation , but does not forbid classification or differentiation which rests upon reasonable ground of discretion . Classification is the recognition of the relations , and in making it the government must be allowed a wide latitude of discretion and judgment . In a way , the consequences of such classification would undoubtedly be to differentiate persons belonging to that class from others . The classification must be founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from others left out of the group and the differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved . Classification may be made accordingto the nature of persons , nature of business , and may be based with reference to time .
27. Concept of equality guaranteedby Article 16 of the Constitution is something more than formal equality and enables the underprivileged groups to have a fair share by having more than equal chance and enables the state to give favoured treatment to those groups by achieving real equality with reference to social needs . ' Protection discrimination ' enabled the state to adopt new strategy to bring underprivileged at par with the rest of the society , by providing all possible opportunities and incentives to them . Therefore a class may be allowed to have preferential treatment in the matter relating to employment or appointment . There cannot be rule of equality between members of separate and independent group of persons . Persons can be classified in different groups , based on terms of nature of persons , nature of business and with reference to time .
28. As detailed above claimant was not at par with Maya Devi for her regularization from pan time sweeper to group ' D ' post . When she was placed in a distinct and different category , she cannot claim parity with Maya Devi .
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
6329 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
in clause ( a) and (b) thereof. In Vijay Kumar Majoo ( 1968 Lab.I.C.1180 ) it was held that one year's period contemplatedby Sub - section (2 ) furnishes a unit of measure and if during that unit of measure the period of service actually rendered by the workman is 240 days , then he can be considered to have rendered one year's continuous service for the purpose of the section. The idea is that if within a unit period of one year a person had put in at least 240 days of service , then he must get the benefit conferred by the Act.
She was not discriminated by the management when her case was not considered favourably for the purpose of her regularization. As projected by the documents Ex. WW2/3 and supporting certificate , case of Smt . Santosh Devi was considered under the aforesaid office memorandum , she had not fulfilled the laid down criteria, hence her case was not considered favourably . Smt . Santosh Devi could not project a case which could place her in the same bracket where Maya Devi was placed. Therefore , she could not point out any case of discrimination , when her services were not regularized against a group ' D' post .
29. Smt . Santosh Devi projects that she served the management from 1-10-86 till 4-4-2007. Her services were terminated in an arbitrary and illegal manner by Shri Narinder Pal , Assistant Engineer . Her husband Vijender Singh raised an industrial dispute , when his services were terminated by the management . The said dispute was answered in his favour by this Tribunal vide its award dated 31-1-2007. Annoyed the said acts , her services were illegally terminated . Shri B. K. Prasad also narrates facts in the same manner . Contra to it Sawant Ram dispels assertion of Smt . Santosh Devi relating to termination of her services . However , Shri Sawant Ramdoes not dispute that Smt . Santosh Devi rendered services as part time sweeper with the management since 1-10-86 till 4-4-2007 . Claimant had filed photo copies of documents issued by Assistant Engineer and counter signed by the Executive Engineer ' J' Division of the management . Those documents were not proved by the claimant yet no dispute was raised by the management about their authenticity and genuineness . Therefore , those documents are taken into consideration . It emerge out of these documents that in 1986 working days of Santosh Devi comes to 92, in 1987 it comes 356 days, in 1988 it comes 353 days , in 1989 it comes 348 days , in 1990 it comes 343 days , in 1991 it comes 351 days , in 1992 it comes 352 days , in 1993 it comes 344 days , in 1994 it comes 349 days , in 1995 it comes 343 days and in 1996 it comes 201 days . Therefore , it is emerging over the record that Smt . Santosh Devi rendered continuous service with the management from 1st of October, 86 till 1996. In respect of other years no such document are placed over the record.
31. Smt . Santosh Devi could not show that she rendered continuous service for more than 240 days in 1987, 1988 , 1989, 1990 , 1991 , 1992, 1993 , 1994 and 1995 . When she had rendered continuous service for more than 240 days in a calendar year , she becomes entitled to the protection available under Section 25 of the Act . In case management disengages her services for any reason otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action or on account of voluntary retirement , retirement on reaching the age of superannuation , termination of service as a result of non renewal of the contract of employment or on account of continued ill- health of the workman, it amounts to retrenchment . When the management opts to retrench the services of the claimant, it is incumbent upon it to abide by the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act . Admittedly services of the claimant were disengaged by the management . Claimant asserts that her services were disengaged on 4-4-2007 . Shri Sawant Ram has not come out with a specific date on that issue . He could not dispel the facts unfolded by the claimant as well as those projected by Shri B. K. Prasad. Consequently it is evident that services of the claimant were disengaged on 4-4-2007 . Management presents that her services were disengaged when there was no work for her . It is not the case of the management that ber services were dispensed with on account of non renewal of contract of her service . Admittedly she had not reached age of superannuation , nor sought voluntary retirement nor her services were dispensed with on the ground of ill health . She has not been punished for any misconduct by way of disciplinary action . Therefore, disengagement of service of the claimant answers the definition of retrenchment as provided under Section 2 (00 ) of the Act . Admittedly do notice or pay in lieu thereof was given to the claimant . No retrenchment compensation was paid to her . Therefore , her retrenchment is in violation of the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act .
30. "Continuous Service " has been defined , by Section 25 B of the Act. Under Sub - Section ( 1 ) of the said Section, "continuous service for a period" may comprise of two period viz . ( i ) uninterrupted service , and ( ii ) interrupted service on account of ( a) sickness , (b ) authorized leave, ( c ) an accident , ( d ) a strike which is not legal , ( e ) a lock - out , and ( f) a cessation of work that is not due to any fault on the part of the workinan , shall be included in the "continuous service " . Sub- section (2 ) of the said Section introduces a fiction to the effect that even if a workman is not in "continuous service " within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months , he shall be deemed to in continuous service for that period under an employer if he has actually worked for the days specified
32. When retrenchment ofthe services of the claimant is in violation of the provisions of Section 25 of the Act. normal rule is reinstatement of service . However there is other facet of the coin . In Uma Devi [ 2006 ( 4 ) SCC 1 ] the Apex Court considered the proposition as to whether the persons who got employment , without following ofa regular procedure or even from the back door or on daily wages can be ordered to be made permanent in their posts, to 3484 GI/10-24 0130
PART II SC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
prevent regular recruitment to the posts concerned . Catena of deaisinas over the subject were considered and the court declined the submissions of the workmen to be made permanent on the posts which were held by them in temporary or adhoc capacity for a fairly long speil . The Cart ruled thus:
With respect, why should the State be allowed to depart from the normal rule and indulge in temporary unmployment in permanent posts ? This Court , in our vien , is bound to insists on the State making regular and proper recruitments , and is bound notto encourage or shut its eyes to the persistent transgression of the rules of regular recruitment . The direction to make permanent the distinction betwin reguarization and making permanent , was nos emphasized here--can only encourage the State, de modal employer, to flout its own rules and would confer undue benefits on a fev at the cost of musny saling to compere. With respect the directious mude ninara Singh 1992 ( 4 ) SCC10d ) is to some exteni mconsistent with the conclusion in para 45 of the salu judgement in tein. With great respect , it appears Asus rost the fact of the recouns clearly runs nounter to the constitutional schemy of employment recognized in the earller pars ofthe decision . Really , it cannot be said that the decision has laid down the law that allad-hoc temporary orcasual employees engaged without following a regular recriitment procedure should be the penarent "
33. Taking note of some ctt egent decisions , the Apex Court held that the state does not enjoy a power to make appointments in terms of Article 162 of the Constitution. The Cestgooted its decision in Cirish Jyansi i al Vaghela (2006 ( 2 ) 500482 ) with approve , whereont was rufed bus.
"The appoinment to any pasader the State can only be made after a proper advarasement has been made inviting applications from eligible candidates and holding of a selection by a body of experts or a specially constituted committee whose members are fr and impartial through a written examination or interview or some other rational criteria for judging the inter se merit of candidates who have applied in response to the advertisement made . A regular appointment to the gust under the State or Union cannot be made without issuing advertisement in the prescribed amanner which may in some cases incide inviting applications from the employment exchange , vihere eligible candidate get their names registered Any regular appointment made on a post under the State or Union without issuing advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates and without holding a proper selection where all afigible candidates get a fair chance to compete would violate the guarantee enshrined under Article 16 of the Constitution "
::
34. In P. Chandra Shekhara Rao and Others 2006 7 SCC 488 ) the Apex Court referred Uma Devi's Case ( supra ) with approval . It also relied the decision in a Uma Ranı ( 2004 7 SCC 112 ) and ruled that no regularizatoa is permissible in exercise of statutory powersvers conferred in Article 162 of the Constitution , if the appointmenis nave been made in contravention of the statutory wies In Somveer Singh ( 2006 5 SCC 493 ) the Apex Court ruled that appointment made without following due procedure.ammot be regularized . In Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticas Ltd. [ 2007 ( 1 ) SCC 408 ] the Apex Court reiterated the laws and announced that the rules of recruitment can not be relaxed and court can not direct regularisation of ten.perary employees dehors the rules , nor can it direct continution ofservice of a temporary employee ( whether called a casual ad - hoc or daily rated employeet or payment..cgular salaries to them .
35. In Uma Devi ( supra ) it was late that wa person enters a temporary employment or met enganenient as contractual or casual worker and the engager ... based on a proper selection as recognized L rules or procedure , he is aware of zece pe appointinent being temporary , casual nature . Such a person cannot invoke the theor- 1 . expectation for being confirmed for appointment to the post could be made on a proper procedure or selection in anc con and consultation with the public service commes the theory of legitimate expectation cannot be te lle advanced by temporary , contractual or casual caployees , It cannot also be held that the State held on an , pode while engaging these persons either to continue there they are or to make them permanent The Star cannot constitutionally make such a prontise . li is also of us that the theory cannot be invoked to seek teliet of being made permanent in the post . In view of those precedes neither continuance nor regularisation of services of the claimants can be ordered , since it would amount to back door entry.
36. Services of the workman were retrenched without payment of notice pay, and retrenchment compensation It is well settled that in a case of wrongful retory neat, dismissal or discharge , the normal rule is in awind reinstatement . But where a case fails in any of the excеринов to general rule , the industrial adjudicator has distretton to award reasonable and adequate compensatio a cu of re-instatement . Section 11 A of the Act vests the dustrial adjudicator with discretionary jurisdiction to give " such other relief to the workman " in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require , where for some valid reasons it considers that reinstatement with or without conditions will not be fair or proper .
37. Services of the claimant were dispensed with in violation of the provisions of section 25 - F of the Act.
6131 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3( ii)]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
Circumstances projected by the claimantdo not show justification for a command to the management to reinstate her services . However , it is to be considered as to what amount of compensation can be awarded to her . No definite yardstick for measuring the quantum of wages/ compensation is available . In S.S.Shetty [ 1957 ( 11 ) LLJ 696 ] the Apex Court indicated some relevant factors which an adjudicator has to take into account in computing compensation in lieu of reinstatement , in the following words:
"The industrial Tribunal would have to take into account the terms and conditions of employment , the tenure of service , the possibility of termination ofthe employment at the instance of either party , the possibility of retrenchment by the employer or resignation or retirement by the workman and even of the employer himself ceasing to exist or of the workman being awarded various benefits including reinstatement under the terms of future awards by industrial Tribunal in the event of industrial disputes arising between the parties in future. In computing the money value of the benefits of reinstatement, the industrial adjudicator would also have to take into account the present value of what his salary , benefits etc.would be till he attained the age of superannuation and the value of such benefits would have to be computed as from the date when such reinstatement was ordered under the terms of the award .
Having regard to the considerations detailed above , it is impossible to compute the money value of this benefit of reinstatement awarded to the appellant with mathematical exactitude and the best that any tribunal or court would do under the circumstances would be to make as correct as estimate as is possible bearing, of course in mind all the relevant factors pro and con" .
39. In Assam Oil Co. Ltd. [ 19 ( DLLJ587) the Apex Court took into account countersing flats that the employer had paid certain sums to the workmen and for own earning in the alternative employinent and on Jered mat " it would be fair and just to direct is app substantial sum as compensation to her , fr Machinery Ltd. [ 1966 ( 1 ) 1.LJ 398 th.. amount of compensation equivalent to two youn alary of t employee awarded by the Industrial Tewnal was redacc by the Supreme Court to an amoun equivalsg, 10 one ye salary ofthe employee in view ofthe fact that in service with the employer only for 5 me the and alge took into consideration the unusual meaper of ir appointment at the instance of the Chief Mase of the State. In A.K.Roy [ 1970 ( 1 ) LUJ 228) compensation equivalent to two years salary last Jrawa by the wori.mca was held to be fair and . proper to meet the ends ofjustice . In Anil Kumar Chakaraborty [ 1962 ( 11 ) L12483 ) the Cour converted the award of reinstatement into compensation of a sum of Rs.50000 as just and fair compensatios in fuli satisfaction of all his claims for wrongful dismissal from service . In O.P.Bhandari [ 1986 ( 11 ) LL 5001, the Apex Court observed that it was a fit case for grant of compensationin view of reinstatement. The Court awarded compensation equivalent to 3.33 years salary as reasonable ١٣٩١.٢. Aggarwal ( 1988 Lab.I.C.380 ). the Apex Court though confirmed the order of reinstatement yet restricted the back salary to 50% of what would otherwise be payable to the employee . In Yashveer Singh ( 1993 1.50.1.C.44 ) the court directed payment of Rs.75000 in view of reinstatement with back wages . In Naval Kishor [ 1984 ( 11 ) LLJ 473 ] the Apex Court observed that in view of the special circumstances ofthe case adequate compensation would be in the intrest of the appellant . A sum of Rs . 2 Lac was awarded as compensation in lieu of reinstatement . In Sant Raj [ 1985 ( 11) LLJ 19 ] a sum of Rs 2 lac was awarded as compensation in lieu of reinstatement. In Chandu Lal ( 1985 Lab.I.C. 12225 ) a compensation of Rs . 2 lac by way of back wages in lieu of reinstatement was awarded . in Ras Bihari ( 1988 Lab.I.C. 107) a compensation of Rs . 65000 was granted in lieu of reinstatement , since the employee was gainfully employed elsewhere . In V.V. Rao ( 1991 Lab.I.C. 1650) a compensation of Rs . 2.50 lac was awarded in lieu of reinstatement .
40. Considering the yardsticks referred above , and on consideration of facts brought over the record by the respective parties , it is ordered that a compensation of Rs . 20,000 would meat the ends ofjustice . Accordingly the management is commanded to make a payment of Rs . 20,000 to Smt . Santosh Devi , as compensation . An award is , accordingly, passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dated: 23-7-2010
Dr. R.K. YADAV , Presiding Officer 38. A Divisional Bench of the Patna High Court in B.Choudhary Vs. Presiding Officer , Labour Court , Jamshedpur ( 1983 ) Lab.I.1755 ( 1758 ) deduced certain guidelines which have to be borne in mind in determining the quantum of compensation viz. ( i) the back wages receivable ( ii ) compensation for deprivation of thejob with future prospect and obtainability of alternative employment; ( iii ) employee's age (iv) Length of service in the establishment , ( v) capacity of the employer to pay and the nature of the employ.i's business , ( vi ) gainful employment in mitigation of damages; and ( viii ) circumstances leading to the disengagement and the past conduct. These factors are only illustrative and not exhaustive . In addition to the amount of compensation, it is also within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to award interest on the amount determined as compensation . Furthermore , the rate of such interest is also in the discretion of the Tribunal . Reference can be made to Tabesh Process , Shivakashi ( 1989 Lab.I.C.1887) .
6332
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ 2345.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-30011 / 2/ 2005- आई आर ( एम ) ]
कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2345. In pursuance of Section 17 of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 45/2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , No - 2 , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010 .
[No. L - 30011 /2/ 2005 - IR (M ) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2 . MUMBAI Present : A.A. Lad , Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT- 2/ 45 of 2006
Employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The CMD
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Petroleum House , 17. Jamshedji Tata Road , Mumbai -400020 .
AND
Their Workman
The General Secretary
All India Petroleum Workers ' Union B/ 203 , Jinga Apartment Currey Road
Mumbai - 400013 .
APPEARANCES
For the Employer
: Ms. Nandini Menon , Advocate
For the Workman
: No appearance .
Mumbai , dated 20th July, 2010
[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour and Employment, by its order No. L- 30011 / 2 / 2005 / IR ( M ) dated 27-07-2006 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Mumbai , in not appointing the dependents of 25 deceased employees (List enclosed ) and permanent total disabled employees as per Clause 24 of Long term settlement dated 13-4-1983 is legal proper and justified ? If not , to what relief these work nen are entitled to and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the matter ? "
Listof employees
1. Babu R. Gaikwad
2. A.V. Ghetla
3. S.S. Padwal
4. G.M. Baria
5. K.A. Gaikwad
6. Shiv Shankar Lal
7. B.D. Ufale
8. Shankar R. Gadekar
9. Bhikaji Salve
10. R.Y. Padwal
11. J.M. Suryawanshi
12. Balwant W. Mane
13. P.S. Bachav
14. P.G. Nikhalge
15. D.S. Pawar
16. K.J. Pati !
17. K.D. Arote
18. Shankar M. Patankar
19. Chindu G. Langhi
20. J.T. Bhiare
21. V.G. Malgi
22. D.C. Mandal
23. P.N. Dhote
24. G.K. Desai
25. A.G. Gaikwad 6333
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2. After receipt of reference , notices were sent to both . On that claim statement was filed by the union at Ex- 5 and written statement by first party at Ex - 12 . Even issues were framed at Ex - 13 and matter was fixed for recording evidence .
3. Though opportunity was given to union to lead evidence , nobody appeared on behalf of the union to prove their case . After waiting for long time for affidavit and looking that, second party is not pursuing matter , it is disposed of for want of prosecution . Hence the order:
ORDER
Reference is disposed of for want of prosecution .
Date: 20-07-2010
A.A. LAD , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 23 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2346. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल पी जी बौटलिंग प्लांट हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 4/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-30012/25/2007 - आई आर ( एम ) ]
कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd August , 2010
S.O. 2346. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 4/2009) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , No. 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LPG Bottling Plant Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-08-2010 .
[No. L - 30012/25 /2007 - IR ( M) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX , DELHI I.D. No. 4/2009
Shri Raj Guru S / o Shri Chhatar Singh , R/ o No. 391/27 , Near Batli Factory ,
Vishamber Nagar ,
Versus
The Plant Manager ,
LPG Bottling Plant , HPCL ,
..Management Rohtak Road , Jind
AWARD
Claimant was engaged by a contractor to carry out maintenance of computers at L.P.G. Bottling Plant , Jind Haryana . He did maintenance job in the said bottling plant , on behalf of the contractor for about a year . When his services were disengaged by the contractor , he raised a demand with the Plant Manager, L.P.G. Bottling Plant , Jind , for reinstatement of his job . Legal notices were also sent onbehalf of the claimant . Since no response was received , the claimant raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer. When conciliation proceedings failed , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No.L - 30012 / 25 / 2007 - IR ( M ) , New Delhi , dated 18-12-2007 , with following terms :
"Whether the demand of Shri Raj Guru S/ o Shri Chhatar Singh , ex - Computer Operator for reinstatement in service of HPCL, Bottling Plant , Jind w.e.f. 5-8-2005 is just , fair and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to and from whom ? "
...Workman
Rohtak Road , Jind
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Raj Guru pleading therein that he was appointed as computer operator on 17-8-04 at daily wages of Rs . 120 , to work at L.P.G. Bottling Plant, Jind , Haryana , after conducting an interview. He was performing his duties to entire satisfaction of his superiors and never gave a chance of complaint to them . His appointment was done by Shri G.K.Singh , Manager . On 24-7-2005 he went to village Uchana , District Jind , Haryana, to pay a visit to his aunt , where he fell ill . He informed his senior on telephone , who allowed half day leave to him . He visited his office in second half of the day and worked there . However , his condition deteriorated and on 30th of July , 2005 , he was advised by medical officer to take proper treatment . On 4th ofAugust , 2005 , he moved an application for leave , which was declined. He was hospitalised for treatment and became able to visit his work place only on 20-10-05 , for resumption of his duties . He was not allowed to enter the Plant and told that his service has been terminated . He again visited the unit but was threatened of dire consequences . His termination amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section 2 (00 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act ) . Provisions ofsection 25 - F of the Act were also violated . He gave legal notice on 25-10-05 and thereafter on 6-12-05 , which were not responded by the management . His wages for the period from 4-8-05 to 20-10-05 were also not paid . He claims reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .
6334
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
3. Claimant statement was resisted pleading that the claimant was never employed by the management . There was no relationship of employer and employee between the parties . The claimant had not submitted any document such as appointment letter , employee number , identity card and salary slip etc. to establish that he was ever appointed by the management . It has been denied that he was appointed as a Computer Operator on 17-8-04 . The management projects that claimant was engaged by the contractor , namely , M / s R.K.Brothers to carry out maintenance work , awarded to him by the management . The claimant visited premises of the management to carry out maintenance work on behalf of the contractor . For appointment to a post , the management has to advertise vacancy in a newspaper as well as at its website , inviting applications from general public . After short - listing applications , a written test is to be conducted which is followed by an interview . Successful candidate is given an appointment letter , who may join services after his medical check up . Claim put forward by the claimant that he was appointed by G.K.Singh , Manager , is false , since Shri Singh had no authority to appoint anyone without following recruitment rules . It has been denied that there was an opportunity for the claimant to move leave applications , as unfolded by him in his claim statement . There was no question of disbursing salary to the claimant . His claim that he was not allowed to resume his duties after his treatment , has no substance . It has been pleaded that the claim, put forward by the claimant , is liable to be dismissed
4. Onpleadings of the parties , following issues were settled.
1. Whether there was relationship of employer and employee between the workman and the management ?
2. As in terms of reference
3. Relief.
5. Claimant has tendered his affidavit Ex . WWI / A as evidence , besides documents Ex . WWI / I to Ex . WW1 / 6 in support of his claim . He was cross examined at length on behalf of the management . Balbir Singh ( WW2 ) was also examined on behalf of the claimant . Shri Pradeep Tanwer , Plant Manager , tendered his affidavit Ex.MWI / A as evidence on behalf of the management . He was cross examined at length on behalf of the claimant . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .
6.Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri Atul Kumar Sharma , assisted by Vineet Sharma , authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the claimant Shri Rajesh Kumar assisted by Shri L.M.S.Bisht advanced arguments on behalf of the management . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:
Issue No. 1
7. Raj Guru swears in his affidavit that he was appointed as Computer Operator by Shri G.K.Singh , the thenManager of the Plant on 17-08-04 after conducting an interview . His wages were Rs . 120 per day . Gate pass was issued in his favour , photo copy of which is Ex . WWI/ 1 . He performed his duties to entire satisfaction of his superiors and never gave a chance of compliant to them. On 24-7-05 he went to village Uchana , District Jind , Haryana , where he fell ill . He took treatment from dispensary , copy ofprescription slip is Ex . WW1 /2 . He was advised to take proper treatment on 30-7-05 . Hence he moved an application for leave on 4-8-05 , which application was declined . Since his condition deteriorated , he was hospitalized for treatment . He visited the Plant on 20-10-05 for joining his duties . He was not allowed to join his duties , saying that his services have been terminated . He sent legal notice on 25-10-05 which is Ex. WW 1/3 . Postal receipt is Ex . WW 1/4 and A.D. Card is Ex . WW1 / 5 . Reply Ex.WW1/ 6 was submitted by the management before the Conciliation Officer . During the course of his cross examination , he concedes that Ex . WW1 / l is photo copy of an application for issuance of a gate pass . He presents that Ex. WW1 / 1 bears signatures of Shri Behra , Security Manager . He admits that he had not applied for service with the management , on an advertisement of vacancy in a newspaper . He asserts that he was kept on job , since he came to know about the vacancy through some source . He admits that wages were not paid to him by the management through cheques . He further admit that regular employees of the management were issued identity card . He presents that an identity card was issued to him , which was kept at the gate when he was not allowed to enter the premises of the management.
8. Shri Balbir Singh ( WW2 ) presents that the claimant was known to him since he was performing his duties at LPG Bottling Plant , Jind , Haryana from August , 2004 till August , 2005. On consideration of authority letter Ex . WW1 / 1 , he permitted entry of the claimant inside the plant. He used to maintain a register for employees of the contractor , wherein their time of arrival and departure were recorded . He admits that he used to make entry in that register in respect of arrival and departure of the claimant . Claimant never entered the bottling plant , by way of punching his cards . Regularemployees were given punching cards by the management . Employees of the contractor were never given any punching card. He admits that the claimant used to visit the bottling plant , to perform work on behalf of the contractor .
9. Pardeep Tanwar unfolds in affidavit Ex.MWI.A that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and the management . No post of Computer Operator exists in the establishment . Hedispels [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
the proposition that the claimant was appointed by Shri G.K.Singh , after conducting an interview . He presents that no record relating to employment of Raj Guru is there in L.P.G. Bottling Plant , Jind. He confirms facts testified by Balbir Singh , to the effect that an outsider can enter the plant , after recording his entry in visitors ' register kept at the gate . According to him application Ex . WW1 / 1 does not relate to L.P.G. Bottling Plant , Jind.
10. When facts unfolded by the claimant , Shri Balbir Singh and Shri Tanwar are appreciated , it came to light that except Ex . WW1 / 1 claimant had not produced any document show that he was appointed by the management as Computer Operator . When Ex . WW1 / 1 is closely perused, it came to light that this application was moved by the cliamant for seeking entry inside the said bottling plant in respect of work . His entry was permitted by an officer of the management and thereafter Shri Balbir Singh , the Security Supervisor , permitted the claimant to make an entry in the bottling plant after recording particulars in that regard invisitors' register . Shri Balbir Singh deposed in bold words that the claimant had not shown his appointment letter to him . He asserts that no identity card was ever issued in favour of the claimant by the management . Employee number was also not allotted to the claimant . No punching card was issued to the claimant , like regular employees of the management . Claimant was allowed entry inside the bottling plant, after recording his particulars in the visitors ' register , highlights Shri Balbir Singh . He announced that the claimant used to visit the bottling plant to perform work on behalf of the contractor . Shri Balbir Singh is the witness , who was brought in the witness box by the claimant . Facts unfolded by Shri Balbir Singh project that the claimant was an employee of the contractor , who used to perform work in the bottling plant on his (contractor) behalf.
11. The relationship of employer and employee is constituted by a contract , express or implied between employer and employee . A contract of service is one in which a person undertakes to serve another and to obey his reasonable orders within the scope of the duty undertaken . A contract of employment may be inferred from the conduct which goes to show that such a contract was intended although never expressed and when there has , in fact , been employment of the kind usually performed by the employees . Any such inference , however , is open to rebuttal as by showing that the relation between the parties concerned was on a charitable footing or the parties were relations or partners or were directors of a limited company which employed no staff . While the employee , at the time , when his services were engaged , need not have known the identity of his employer , there must have been some act or contract by which the parties recognized one another as master or servant .
6335 12. A distinction is always drawn between " contract for service " and " contract of service " . In one case the master can order or require what is to be done , while in the other case he cannot only order or require what is to be done , but how itself it shall be done . The distinction is - under a contract of service , a man is employed as a part of the business and work is done as an integral part of the business , while under contract for service , his work , although done for the business , is not integrated into it , but is only assessory to it . But the test of being a servant does not rest now a days on submissions to orders . It depends on whether person is part and parcel of the organization.
13. Mere existence of a contract of service would not confer a relationship of employer and employee until the employer is in a position to control the work of the employee . A master is one who not only prescribes to the workman the end of his work , but directs or at any moment may direct the means also , or , as it has been put , " retains the power of controlling the work " , a servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work . An independent contractor is one who undertakes to produce a given result but so that in actual execution of the work he is not under the order or control of the person for whom he does it , and may use his own discretion in things not specified before hand .
14. In Shivnandan Sharma [ 1955 ( 1 ) LLJ 688 ] , the Apex Court for the first time laid down the crucial test of supervision and control for determining the relationship of employer and employee . In Dharangadhara Chemical Works Limited [ 1957 ( 1 ) LLJ 477] , the Apex Court ruled that test of "supervision and control may be taken as the prima facie test for determining the relationship of employment " . It was further laid that existence of the right in the master to supervise and control the work to be done by the servant , not only matter of directing that work the servant is to do but also the manner in which he shall do his work is the prima facie test for determining the existence of master and servant relationship . It was suggested that correct method of approach , would be to consider whether having regard to the nature of work there was due control and supervision by the employer . The greater amount of direct control exercised over the person rendering the services by the person contracting for them , the stronger the ground for holding it to be a contract of service . The control and supervision test was reaffirmed by the Apex Court in Chintaman Rao [ 1958 ( 1 ) LLJ 252 ] , wherein it was ruled that " worker " was a person employed by the management and there must be contract of service and a relationship of master and servant between them . In Shankar Balaji Waje [ 1962 ( 1 ) LLJ 119 ] , the Apex Court clarified that " control of the management , which is a necessary element of the relationship of master and servant is not directed towards providing or dictating the nature of the article to be produced or the work to be done , but refers to the other 6336
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
concern for whom he was doing the work , in Achuta Achar [ 1968 ( 1 ) LLJ 500 ] . An agreement for selling milk on commission was held to be a contract for service and not a contract of service , in Abad Dairy Doodh Vitran Kendra Sanchalak Mandal , Ahmedabad ( 1989 Lab.I.C.1770 ) . The Tiny Deposit Agents employed in deposit mobilization activity of the bank have been held to be falling within the definition of the workman and not an indepenaent contractor in the precedent in the Management of Indian Bank [ 1990 ( 1 ) LLJ 50 ] .
incidents having a bearing on the process of work the person carries out in the execution of the work . The manner ofwork is to be distinguished from the type of work to be performed . In V. P. Gopala Rao [ 1970 ( 11 ) LLJ 59 ] , the Apex Court said that it is the question of fact in each case whether the relationship of master and servant exists between the management and the workman and there is no abstract a priori test of the work control required for establishing the contract of service . It was laid therein that for holding that the persons employed in the factory were workers within the meaning of sub section ( 1 ) of section (2 ) ofthe Factories Act , it is to be considered that the fact that the workman had to work in the factory implied certain amount of supervision by the management and the nature and extent of control varied in different industries and that when the operation was of a simple nature , the control could be exercised at the end of the day of the method of rejecting the bid is which did not come up to the proper standard . It is, therefore , not surprising that in recent years , the control test , as traditionally formulated , has not been treated as an exclusive test . In Silver Jublee Tailoring House [ 1973 ( 11 ) LLJ 495 ] the Apex Court ordained that " it is in its application to skilled and particularly professional work that control test in its traditional form has really broken down. It has been said that in interpreting that " control" as meaning the power to direct how the servant should do the work, the court has been applying the concept suited to a past age " .
16. Except Ex. WW1 / 1 no document is put forward by the claimant to show that he was engaged by the management . Ex . WW1 / 1 nowhere empowers the claimant to say that he was engaged by the management . It simply highlights that entry of the claimant was permitted inside the said plant . Why his entry was permitted inside the plant , those facts have been explained by Balbir Singh. He presents that the claimant used to perform work in the plant on behalf of the contractor . All attributes of an employee of a contractor has been attached by Balbir Singh to the claimant , when he projects that neither an appointment letter nor an identity card nor a punching card was issued to him. He gives confirmation to the theory ofan employee of a contractor , deposing that the claimant used to make his entry in the visitors ' register , kept for visitors only . Therefore , facts unfolded by Balbir Singh restricts the case of the claimant to the effect that he was an employee of a contractor . He was never engaged by the management . The claimant has not been able to show his engagement by the management at any point of item . His assertion that he was engaged by Shri G.K.Singh , Manager , has been cut to size by facts unfolded by Shri Batbir Singh. Story put forward by the claimant stood melt away, when Balbir Singh narrated facts . Claimant could not question creditability of Balbir Singh , since he was made to enter in the witness box by the former . No eye brows were raised on Balbir Singh when he narrated facts in the , matter. Therefore , assertions made by the claimant are found to be farther from the truth . Facts presented by Balbir Singh gives reaffirmation to story projected by Pardeep Tanwar . Taking into consideration all these facts I am constrained to conclude that the claimant has failed to establish that he was ever engaged by the management and relationship of employer and employee were created. No case has been established to the effect that the claimant ever worked under the control and supervision of the management . He could not establish that the management ever exercised control and supervision of his work. Considering the clinching evidence , the issue is , therefore , answered in favour of the management and against the claimant .
Issue No.2 .
17. Since the claimant was an employee of a contractor, it does not lie in his mouth to raise a demand on the management for reinstatement of his services . Demand 15. During the last three decades emphasis in the field has shifted and no longer rests so strongly upon the question of control . Control is obviously an important factor and in many cases it may still be a decessive factor, but it would be wrong to say that in every case it is a decessive factor . In Shining Tailors [ 1983 ( 11 ) LLJ 143 ] , the Apex Court held that the piece rated workers working for a big tailoring establishment were workmen for the establishment . It was observed therein that the " right of removal of the workman or not to give work is an element of control and supervision " which was amply satisfied to announce that those piece rated workers were the workmen for the establishment . The Court concluded that the proposition that " piece rate " itself indicates relationship of independent contract , is not correct . A servant who has fuli liberty to attend to his work according to his pleasure and not according to orders of his master , is an independent contractor . A goldsmith engaged to finish jewels within a given time and when it was open to such goldsmith to finish jewels within the given time or earlier and engage themselves or others of their own were held to be independent contractors , in K.Keswa Reddiar [ 1957 ( 1 ) LLJ 645 ] . In the like manner a goldsmith who undertook the manufacture of ornaments like other goldsmith which he was asked to manufacture and was entitled to receive remuneration which would depend upon the nature of the work done , was held to be not under the order or control of the proprietor of the भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
made by the claimant is neither just nor fair , not to talk of its legality. Absence of privity of contract between the claimant and the management denounces merits of his claim. Hisdemand is , therefore , held to be unjust , unfair and illegal . The issue is , therefore , answered in favour of the management and against the claimant . Relief.
18. In view of my decision on issue No.1 and 2 , the claimant is not entitled to any relief. His claim for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages isbrushedaside . An award is , accordingly , passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dated: 22-7-2010
Dr. R.K. YADAV , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2347.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैलाडीला आयरन ओर प्रोजेक्ट डिपोजिट सं. 5. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 89/87 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ संख्या एल-26012/44 / 85 / डी- III ( बी ) ]
कमल बाखरु , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th August , 2010
S.O. 2347. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 89/87 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bailadila Iron Ore Project Deposit No. 5 and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-08-2010 .
[No. L- 26012 /44 / 85 / D - III ( B) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR
No. CGIT /LC / R/ 89 / 87
Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan
The General Secretary
Bailadila Iron Ore Project ( CITU ) ,
Hill- Top , PO Bacheli ,
6337
Versus
The General Manager
Bailadila Iron Ore Project ,
Deposit No. 5 ,
PO Bacheli ,
Management Distt . Bastar (MP)
AWARD
Passed on this 23rd day of July - 2010 1. The Government of India , Minstry of Labour vide itsNotification No.L - 26012 /44/ 85 - D.III ( B ) dated 19-6-1987 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:--
"Whether the action of the General Manager , Bailadila Iron Ore Project Deposit No.5 at Bacheli in reverting Shri Laxman Prasad from Mechanic Grade III to Maintenance Assistant as a measure of penalty for alleged misconduct under Certified Standing orders is fair and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
Workman/Union
Distt . Bastar ( MP )
2. The case of the Union / workman in short is that the workman Shri Laxman Prasad was appointed as Khalasi on 2-11-72. He was promoted upto the post of Mechanic Grade III , w.e.f. 3-4-81 . He was executive member of Bailadila Mazdoor Union ( CITU ) and had actively raised the demands of the workers causing annoyance to the management . He was served with chargesheet dated 8-2-83 alleging therein about commission of misconduct under the Standing Orders . It is stated that the agitation was originated from the circular of the management whereby the workers of Service Centre were directed to report on normal duty on 26-1-1983 ( Republic Day ) which was National Holiday and it was Wednesday as such it was weekly rest day as well . As a result the workers did not report on duty on 26-1-83 and they were marked absent . Peaceful agitation started by them w.e.f. 27-1-83 . A verbal agreement was reached between the management and the employees of Service Centre and the workers with drew the agitation w.e.f. 2-2-83 but on 3-2-83 , the management suspended many workers including this workman . Thereafter the charge sheet was served and the worker gave reply but the management was not satisfied with the reply of the workman and a departmental proceeding was initiated by appointing of the Enquiry Officer . The Enquiry Officer conducted the proceeding violating the principle of natural justice . During the course of enquiry , the workman was served with another chargesheet on 17-4-83 with prejudice mind . The workman denied the charges . He was not given proper opportunity to defend himself. After enquiry the Enquiry Officers submitted enquiry reports in both the proceedings . The Disciplinary Authority show caused the workman . The workman replied the same but the Disciplinary Authority with perverse finding passed the order dated 25-9-84 of punishment whereby he was reverted to the post of 6338
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Maintenance Assistant . On these ground , it is submitted that the order of punishment be set aside with all arrears of wages.
vide order dated14-12-89 . Thus there is no fresh evidenc adduced in the Tribunal . Thus both the issue are accordingly answered.
6. Issue No.2 & 4
3. The management appeared and filed Written Statement . The case of the management , interalia is that the workman Shri Laxman Prasad , Mechanic III was served with two charge sheets on 8-2-83 and 17-4-83 for his misconduct . The workman denied the charges . Two different departmental proceedings were initiated against him by appointing Enquiry Officers who conducted the enquiries . The opportunities were given to him by the Enquiry Officers to defend himself. The workraaz took the assistance of co - workers in both the proceedings . The witnesses were examinted in both proceedings in presence ofthe workman and his co - workers cross - examined these witnesses which were held separately. After conclusion of the enquiries , the enquiry Officers submitted enquiry reports separately in boch proceedings holding therein that the charges stund proved . The copy of the enquiry reports were supplied to the workman and show cause was asked from him . After considering the entire facts and circumstances ofboth the proceedings and after examining the evidence adduced in the proceedings , the Disciplinary authority passed the order of punishment on 25-9-84 reverting the workman Shri Laxman Prasad from the post of Mechanic III to the post of Maintenance Assistant . It is stated that the punishment awarded to Shri Laxman Prasad is the minimum appropriate punishment to the serious charges duly proved against him . It is submitted that the management is rully justified and the claim of the workman be rejected.
Asdiscussed above , no fresh evidence is adduce by either of the parties in the Tribunal . Both have relied o the DE papers . Two proceedings were conducted and th two files are marked as Article " A " and Article " B " . Nov the points are to be seen as to whether the findings of th Enquiry Officers are perverse and the punishment i proportionate or not. Section 11 - A of the Industrial Disput Act, 1947 provides discretion to the Tribunal that wher the management held the workman guilty of th misconduct , the Tribunal can in view of the aforesai section differ from the finding in a proper case and hol that no misconduct is proved . The Apex Court in Ush Breco Mazdoor Sangh versus Management of Usha Brec Limited and another reported in ( 2008 ) 5. S.C.C.55 interpretated the application of Section 11 A of the I.D.Ac 1947 in the light of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of Indi (P) Ltd. case , ( 1973 ) 1 SCC 813. It is laid down that in th event of fresh evidence adduced before the labour cou by management , the Labour Court will have jurisdiction t appreciate the evidence . But in a case where meterial brought on record by enquiry officer fall for re - appreciatio by the Labour Court , it should be slow to interfere therew it ! Thus it is clear that where no new and fresh evidence t brought on the record and only on the materials availab ! before the Enquiry Officer is before the Tribunal , th Tribunal should only in proper cases where the finding i perverse , interfere with the punishment.
4.On the pleadings of both the parties , the following issues are framed-...
i Whether the domestic/departmental enquiry is proper and legal ?
i. Whether the punishment awarded is proper and legal?
iii. Whether the management is entitled to lead evidence before this Tribunal ?
iv. Whether the termination / action taken against the workman is justified on the facts of the case?
v. Relief and costs?
7. Now it is to be examined that the materials availabl on the record is sufficient to take any different findings Onperusal of the DE papers and the pleadings of the parties itisadmitted that the workman was on strike . The witnesse have supported the case of the management . They hav supported that the workman alongwith others obstructe the work and abused the management and other persons It looks probable that when they were on strike , such ac was committed by them which was supported by th witnesses . In another proceeding , the witnesses hav supported the case of the management . I find that th finding of the Enquiry Officers are not perverse . I find tha the punishment is just and proportionate . There is no reaso to interfere with the order of punishment . These issues ar decided in favour of the management .
5. Issue No.1 & 3
8. Issue No. 5
On the basis of the discussion made above , I fin that the workman is not entitled to any relief. According!: the reference is answered .
9. In the result , the award is passed without an order to costs .
Preliminary issue is earlier taken up as to whether the Departinental enquiry is , proper and legal . It is already held by the then Tribunal on 9-3-99 that the procedure adopted in the DE is valid , proper and legal . Thereafter none of the parties adduced any evidence in the Tribunal and have relied all the documents of the DE papers which are admitted [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
6339
AWARD 29-07-2010
10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .
MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2010
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause ( d ) of sub section 1 & 20A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication which is as under : -
"Whether the industrial dispute raised by Paithar Khan Kamgar Union , Kota against the management of Associated Stone Industries , Kota over termination of services of Sh . Shaukat Ali Sto Sh. Mehmood. Ali w.e.f. 23-4-2003 justitied? If so , to whatrelief the concerned workman is entitled? " का.आ. 2348. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एसोसियेटेड टोन इन्डस्ट्रीज कोटा लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट संदर्भ संख्या 123/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार कने 24-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ संख्या एल-29012/ 32/ 2004- आई आर ( एम ) ]
कमल बाखरु , डेस्क अधिकारी
2. Pursuant to the reference registered notices were issued to both the parties . The clain statement of the workman was filed on 13-12-2005 . The non - applicant filed its reply on 10-4-2006 and rejoinder was filed on 29-5-2006 .
New Delhi , the 24th August , 2010
3. On 21-5-2010 an application was moved on behalf of the legal representatives of the workman Shaukat Ali , stating therein that the workman has died . Therefore, they may be impleaded as party in the reference proceeding. Shri Darshan Singh , Advocate , filed his authority letter on behalf of the legal representatives of the deceased workman.
S.O. 2348. In pursuance of Section 17 of the ndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central overnment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 123 / 005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour ourt , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial ispute between the employers in relation to the anagement of M/ s . Associated Stone Industries ( Kota ) d . and their workman , which was received by the Central overnment on 24-8-2010 .
[No. L - 29012 / 32/ 2004 - IR (M ) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
esent : N.K. Purohit, Presiding Officer
4. Subsequently on next date i.e. 2-7-2010 the legal representatives of the workman were impleaded as party in the case and on the same date they also moved an application stating therein that the dispute between the parties has been settled on the basis of the compromise between the parties and they have received the cheque of the amount payable to the deceased workman . The learned representative on behalf of the both sides have submitted thatmatter in dispute has been resolved between the parties and both the sides do not want to lead any evidence and requested that the matter may be disposed off on the basis of settlement between the parties .
1. 123/05
ference No. L -29012 / 32 / 2004 - IR ( M ) dated : 18-10-2005
5. In present matter the reference under adjudication is whether the action of the management of the opposite party in terminating the services of the workman Shaukat Ali was justified?
Shri Shaukat Ali S/ o Mehmood Ali , Q.No. 8 , Udyala Colony , Vill & Post Udayala , Tehsil Ramganj , Kota ( Raj .) (died during proceeding & L. R. impleaded )
6. The statement of claim was filed by the workman but he died during the pendency of the reference and his legal representatives have been impleaded as party in the present dispute .
The General Secretary , Patthar Khan Kamgar Union ( HMS ) , Bengali Colony , Chhawani , Kota ( Raj . )
V/ s
Associated Stone Industries ( Kota ) Ltd. nganjmandi , Kota ( Raj . )
7. Since , the matter in dispute has been settled between the parties and admittedly the legal representatives of the deceased workman have received the amount payable to the workman and both the parties have requested to dispose of the case on the basis of the settlement between the parties and they have not adduced any evidence in support of their respective case , it appears that no dispute 6340
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27 , 1932
exist between the parties and grievances of the workman stand redressed . Moreover , there is no material on record foradjudicating the reference on merit.
8. Resultantly , no relief is required to be given to the legal representatives of deceased workman and " No Claim Award" is passed in this matter . The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly .
9. Award as above .
N.K. PUROHIT , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2349-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स मसूद अहमद आत्मज श्री हाजी सुल्तान अख्तर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोटा के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-08-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ संख्या एल-29012 / 25 / 2001 / आई आर ( एम ) ]
कमल बाखरु , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th August , 2010
S.O. 2349. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 10/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s Masood Ahmed S /o Hajee Sultan Akhtar and their workman , which was received by the Central Governinent on 24-08-2010 .
[No. L - 29012 /25 /2001 / IR ( M ) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
अनुबन्ध
न्यायाधीश , औद्यौगिक न्यायाधिकरण/केन्द्रीय/कोटा/राज.
पीठासीन अधिकारी- अनुराधा शर्मा , आर.एन.जे.एस
निर्देश प्रकरण क्रमांक ओ. न्या. केन्द्रीय/ 10/ 01
दिनांक स्थापित 6-6-01
प्रसंगः भारत सरकार , श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के आदेश संख्या एल 29012 / 25 / 2001 / आईआर ( एम ) दिनांक 14-5-01 निर्देश विवाद अन्तर्गत धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( घ ) औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947
मध्य
रमेशचन्द पुत्र श्री भैरुलाल
द्वारा राष्ट्रीय मजदूर संघ जनरल सेक्रेट्री
रामगंजमण्डी जिला कोटा ।
[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
एवं
मैं मसूद अहमद पुत्र श्री हाजी सुल्तान अख्तर ,
.... अप्रार्थी नियोजक रामगंजमण्डी जिला कोटा ।
उपस्थित
कोई उप. नहीं प्राथी श्रमिक की ओर से प्रतिनिधिः-
अप्राथी नियोजक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि: - श्री आर.एस. शर्मा अधिनियम दिनांक : 29-7-10
अधिनिर्णय
भारत सरकार , श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के प्रासंगिक आदेश दिनांक 14-5-01 के जरिये निम्न निर्देश/ विवाद, औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 जिसे तदुपरान्त " अधिनियम " से सम्बोधित किया जायेगा की धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( घ ) के अन्तर्गत इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णय समप्रेषित किया गया है: --
"Whether the action of the management in terminating the service of Sh . Ramesh Chand S / o Sh . Bheru Lal on 1-8-2000 from the post of Munshi by the management of M's . Massod Ahmed legal and justified ? If not , what relief Sh . Ramesh Chand is entitled and from which date ? "
2. निर्देश/विवाद , न्यायाधिकरण में प्राप्त होने पर पंजीबद्ध उपरान्त पक्षकारों की सूचना विधिवत रूप में जारी की गयी जिस पर दोनों पक्षों की ओर से अपने-अपने अभ्यावेदन प्रस्तुत किये गये । 3. दौरान विचारण पत्रावली दि. 27-7-10 को वास्ते जिरह प्रार्थी नियुक्त थी किन्तु उस दिन ना तो स्वंय प्रार्थी अथवा उसका कोई अधिकृत प्रतिनिधि न्यायाधिकरण में उपस्थित हुआ एवं ना ही किसी प्रकार की कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत हुई। पत्रावली में प्राथी श्रमिक पिछली कई पेशियों पर भी कई बार उपस्थित नहीं हुआ । इन समस्त तथ्यों को दृष्टिगत रखते हुए और समय दिया जाना उचित नहीं समझते हुए प्रार्थी की साक्ष्य बंदी का आदेश पारित किया गया और उसके द्वारा पूर्व में प्रस्तुत शपथ - पत्र उक्त कारण से साक्ष्य में ग्राह्य योग्य नहीं रहा । अप्रार्थी पक्ष की ओर से भी उक्त तिथि को भी कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं किये जाने का कथन करते हुए अपनी साक्ष्य समाप्त की गयी । बहस पक्षकारों की सुनी गयी , पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया । अवलोकनोपरान्त यह स्पष्ट प्रकट होता है कि प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से अपने द्वारा प्रस्तुत क्लेम स्टेटमेन्ट को किसी भी तरह की साक्ष्य से साबित नहीं किया गया है , अर्थात् वो अपने मामले को साबित करने में पूर्णतया अंसफल रहा है । अतः प्रार्थी श्रमिक अधिनियमान्तर्गत कोई संरक्षण प्राप्त नहीं होने से किसी प्रकार का कोई अनुतोष अप्रार्थी नियोजक से प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है और सम्प्रेषित निर्देश/विवाद को इसी प्रकार से अधिनिर्णित कर उत्सरित किया जाता है ।
अनुराधा शर्मा , न्यायाधीश
.... प्रार्थी श्रमिक
6341 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2350.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नेहरू युवा केन्द्र संगठन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं . 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42012/66/2006- आईआर ( डीयू) ]
जोहन तोपनो , अवर संचिव
New Delhi , the 25th August , 2010
S.O. 2350.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. - 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 25-8-2010 .
knowledge , in solving those problems was to enrich their experience and prepare them for challenges in later life . The scheme was designed to achieve twin objectives of man making and nation building . The work of the scheme was to be area and locality specific . During pilot stage the scheme was implemented as a central sector scheme having Steering Committee and the Executive Committee at National level , Advisory Committee at State level and Advisory Committee and Executive Committee at the District Level . Department of Youth Arfairs and Sports , Government of India was responsible for over all implementation of the scheme , while Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan , ( hereinafter referred to as the management ) , an autonomous organization under admistrative control of department of Youth Affairs and Sports , was to work as iniplementing agency . District Youth Coordinator was to establish linkages with agencies like National Service Scheme , District Rural Development Agency , District Urban Development Agency and the various non- governmental organisation , working in the related areas . He was to identify projects suitable for implementation and work out modalities of implementation and all other requisite details in consultation with the beneficiary departments , finalize the bukdget , and ensure availability of funds and deployment of volunteers.
[No. L-42012/ 66/2006- IR(DU) ]
JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- NO.1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI
ID.NO.9 /2007
Shri Chander Dutt
2. A Project Officer was to assist District Youth Coordinator in implementation of the scheme . Project Officer was to be deployed by the management for each district where the scheme was to be implemented on a lump sum honorarium of Rs 4000 PM on contract basis for one year extendable for one more year . He was to be paid a maxima ofRs.1000 PM as travel allowance . His appointment was to terminate automatically on expiry of contract period . Volunteers were to be deployed by the management on specific projects relating to community and national development . Volunteers were to be recruited for one year only, maintaining transparency in the method of their recruitment .
...Workman
R/ o House No. 156 , IVth Floor, Savitri Nagar , New Delhi - 110017 .
Versus
The Executive Director ,
Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan ,
...Management
Department of Youth Affair and Sports , Min. of Human Resources , East Plaza , I.G. Indore Stadium, New Delhi - 110001 .
AWARD
3. The scheme , being a central sector scheme , was to be funded by the Central Government . An amount of Rs.6500 PM per selected district , was to be provided by the management for establishment expenses . Volunteers were to be given honorarium of Rs . 1000 PM , inclusive of travel expenses . Two weeks training and orientation programme was to be organized for the volunteers , to enable them to acquire a deep understanding of the objectives and issues involved in national development and to impart specific managerial and technical skills . Therefore , it were the youth coordinators , project officers and volunteers , who were to be deployed on projects sponsored by the beneficiary departments at Central and the State level .
4. The scheme was sanctioned for 80 districts during the year 2001-2002 , but was operationalised in 76 districts , National Re - construction Corps , ( known as N.R.Scheme) for Youth was launched during the year 1999 all over the Country , but actual functioning of the scheme started in May and June , 2001. The scheme provided an opportunity to the youth to participate in the process of nation buildings . Working for and with the community , understanding problems of real life and utilizing skills and 6342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
the services of their workman Shri Chander Dutt w.e.f. 30-4-04 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the applicant is entitled to ? "
except four districts of West Bengal . It was extended to another 40 districts during the year 2002-2003 . The scheme was on pilot phase upto 31st of March , 2003. In order to implement the scheme effectively , following committees were functioning to advise and guide the field functionaries :
1. National Steering Committee headed by the Hon'ble Union Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports , Government ofIndia.
2. National Executive Committee headed by the Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports , Government of India.
3. Board of Governors of the management headed by Hon'ble Union Minister for Youth Affairs and Sports , Government of India .
4. State level Advisory Committee headed by Hon'ble Minister for Youth . Affairs and Sports of the concerned State Government .
5. District level Advisory Committee headed by Chairman , Zila Parishad of the concerned district .
7. In his claim statement Shri Chander Dutt pleads that he was appointed by the management as a group ' D ' staff on 18-5-2001 on daily wage basis , due to huge work load. Competent authority approved his engagement vide office order dated 16-4-2002 . Though he was retained/ absorbed against a regular post w.e.f. January , 2002 , yet his services were terminated on 30-4-04 , without following due process of law. He served a legal notice as well as reminder on the management but no response was received. He filed a writ petition before High Court of Delhi , contents ofwhich petition may be read as part of his claim statement . (Copy of writ petition was not filed , which fact makes his request meaningless ) . Later on writ petition was withdrawn , with a permission to make representation to the management . He made a representation , which was not responded to by the management . He claims reinstatement in service with continuity , full back wages and all consequential benefits .
6. District level Executive Committee headed by DM/DC of the concerned district .
5. During November/ December , 2001 and January , 2002 internal evaluation was carried to have feed back of strength and weekness on implementation of the scheme. Workshops were organized in September/October , 2002 at different places . A meeting was conducted at the Head Quarters of the management in October , 2002 for selected officers , who were having knowledge of management information system . One day workshop was organized at six places for the project officers , selected volunteer youth coordinators and original coordinators . A survey proforma was developed for collecting required information through personal contract programme . Outcome of evaluation was submitted to the Ministry and decision on continuation of the scheme pends consideration .
8. Claim was resisted by the management pleading therein that he was never appointed as a regular employee , following due process of law. The management was given responsibility to implement a nationwide project , known asN.R.Scheme . While implementing that project , it was observed at various level that work load had increased and a necessity was felt to deploy daily wagers , so that regular programme may not hamper . Accordingly the claimant was appointed as a peon on 18-5-2001 on daily wage basis , besides others . He was paid for actual working days . A daily wager cannot have legitimate expectation of regularization of his services . Since he was appointed against the scheme , 240 days continuous service in a calendar year would not give him a right for regularization . Before termination of his services , he was given one month notice . Since there was no right in his favour against a substantive post be cannot claim reinstatement or regularization of his service . His claim is liable to be dismissed .
9. Claimant tendered his affidavit Ex . WWI/ A as evidence . He was cross examined at length on behalf of the management . Shri R.P.S.Thakur was examined by the management . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .
6. To run establishments at district level , group ' D' employees were engaged . Shri Chander Dutt was engaged on 18th of May , 2001 as a daily wager . His engagement was approved vide order dated 6-6-2001 . He was paid minimum wages as per actual days of his work . His engagement was extended from time to time . His services were disengaged on 30-4-2004 . He raised a demand for reinstatement in service . When his request for reinstatement was not conceded to , he filed a writ petition before High Court of Delhi on 10th of December , 2004. He withdrew thatwrit petition , to seek redressal of his grievances with the management . Ultimately he raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer . When conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No.L - 42012 /66/2006- IR ( DU ) , New Delhi , dated 25-01-2007 , with the following terms:
10. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri Rajesh Sehrawat , authorised representative , advanced arguments onbehalf ofthe claimant . Shri Rana Ranjit Singh , authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the management . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :
"Whether the action of the management of Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan , New Delhi , in terminating
11. Shri Chander Dutt swears in his affidavit Ex . WW1 / A that he was appointed by the management as a [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6343 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
and discard rest of its contents . Claimant cannot be permitted to have benefit of that note and discard the rest , which goes against him. On the strength of this document it is emerging that service of the claimant were engaged against the scheme referred above . He was appointed as a group ' D' employee on daily wage basis . Ex.MW1 / W1 is the other letter on the strength of which the claimant and others were made known that the competent authority has approved their engagement on daily wage basis , with effect from the dates of their reporting at respective places . This letter projects that the claimant was to join at the Head Quarter of the management , while others were to join at various Zonal Offices under the scheme referred above . Claimant and others were to draw daily wages at prevalent rates in concerned district for unskilled casual labours . Therefore , this document makes it clear that the claimant and others were appointed by the management against the scheme referred above .
member ofgroup ' D ' staff on 18-5-2001 on daily wage basis , due to heavy work load . His appointment was approved by the competent authority vide order dated 16-4-2002 . Despite the fact that he was absorbed against a regular post and was allowed dearness allowance w.e.f. January , 2003 , his services were terminated without following due process of law . After his illegal termination , he served a legal notice as well as reminder on the management . Termination of his services is illegal , unjustified , unfaIr labour practice and against the principles ofnatural justice . During the course ofhis cross examination , he projects that through someone he came to know about vacancy for daily wager , hence he approached the management. He tendered his resume for appointment . No written test was conducted . However his interview was conducted by Director General of the management . He was appointed in the head quarters of the management , located atIndira Gandhi Indoor Stadium , Delhi . He was not told about the period or the programme for which his appointment was made . He presents that he joined his services with the management on 1-6-2001 .
14. Ex.MW1 / 2 unfolds that Zonal Offices requested the management to provide more staff for completion of administrative work in time. Bio-data of seven persons were received for appointment on daily wage basis and out of those seven candidates six persons , including the claimant , were appointed as daily wager unskilled labour under the scheme . Ex.MW 1/6 A to Ex.MW 1/6 N are the documents on the strength of which wages in favour of the claimant and others were released from December , 2001 till December , 2002. These documents make it clear that recipients of wages were posted at various places . These documents go to establish that recipients of wages were posted at various Zonal Offices under the scheme . Ex.MW1 / 7 to Ex.MW1 / 33 also highlight the very proposition . Documents Ex.MW1 / 30 to Ex.MW1 / 33 bear signatures of the claimant and others as recipients of wages . Therefore , the claimant cannot dispute that he was engaged by the management against the scheme as daily wager and was paid for actual daysofwork.
12. Shri R.P.S.Thakur , Deputy Director , deposed that Chander Dutt was appointed as casual employee on 18-5-2001 . He was appointed in the project known as N.R. Scheme , which project was to be completed within a period of two years . Since the project came to an end , services of the claimant were dispensed within May , 2004. A notice was served on the claimant on 29-3-2004 informing him that his services would not be required from May, 2004. His wages were paid on monthly basis for actual working days . Pay of workman was released to him for the month of April , 2004. A daily wager has no right for regularization of his services . Claimant was taken on job on need basis . During the course of his cross examination , he concedes that when claimant was appointed no specific period of employment was made known to him . He admits that when a project comes to an end , an employee may be continued in other project if exigency so arises . According to him services of the claimant were terminated , since he committed a misconduct.
13. When facts projected by the claimant and Shri Thakur were appreciated , it came to light that scheme Ex.MW1 / 1 was implemented by the management. Many employees were appointed under that scheme . Ex.MW1 / W7 highlights that the claimant was appointed as a daily wager in the management , since requests were there from various Zonal Directors for deployment of group ' D ' staff on daily wage basis . The letter makes it clear that group 'D ' employees , appointed on the roll of the management , were in excess to sanctioned posts . However , keeping in view exigency and heavy work load, requests made by Zonal Directors were conceded and claimant , besides others , was appointed in N.R.Scheme . Ex.MW1 / W7 was issued in respect of engagement of the claimant . Claimant wants to use this document in part , to establish his appointment
15. Can claimant dispute that he was not aware that his appointment was made against the scheme ? A hue and cry was raiser by the claimant that no such fact was ever brought to his notice . He presents that he was appointed against a regular post . His contention stands beliled when documents Ex.MW1 / W7 is perused . As noted above , steps were taken to engage claimant and others on requests received from Zonal Directors of Madhya Pradesh , Rajasthan , Himachal Pradesh and Bihar for deployment of group ' D' on daily wage basis . Zonal Director , U.P. made request for deployment of Computer Operator . It was unfolded in Ex.MW1 / W7 that group ' D ' employees on the roll ofthe management ,. were in excess to sanctioned posts , yetkeeping in view office exigencies and heavy work load of the scheme , requests for deployment made by various Zonal Directors were sent to the competent authority for approval . Ex.MW1 / W1 makes it clear that approval was granted by the competent authority to appoint claimant 6344
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under the stipulation in that behalf contained therein ; or
(c) termination of the service of a workman on the ground of continued ill health ; " and others on daily wage basis , in the office of respective Zonal Directors . Ashok Kumar Morya and the claimant were deputed in the head quarters , while Govind Prashad Shukla was sent to the Office of Zonal Director , Bhopal (M.P. ) , Shiv Kumar Dhore was sent to Office of the Regional Coordinator NYK , Gwalior ( M.P. ) , Shri Udai Singh was sent to the Office of R.C. NYK , Tikangarh (M.P. ) and Shri Anand Pande was sent to the Office of Zonal Director NYKS Patna (Bihar) . Therefore , this document makes it clear that on requests received from various Zonal Directors , Group ' D ' employees were recruited and deputed to carry out work in the establishment of various Zonal Directors , under the scheme . Therefore , it was well within the knowledge ofthe claimant that he was appointed by the management against the scheme , referred above . When the claimant accepted offer of appointment , made on the strength of Ex. MWI / W1 , he is estopped from agitating that he was not appointed against the scheme .
16. Shri R.P.S.Thakur had proved letter dated 16-11-07 as Ex . MW1 / 35 . When this letter was perused it came to light that on 16-11-07 , the President has conveyed abolition of Regional Offices and Regional Coordinators were designated as Deputy Directors . 181 posts of peons have been abolishedfrom 16-11-2007 , unless they are occupied by regular appointees . In case a regular appointee is there that post would be deemed to have been abolished from the date when he superannuates or gets adjusted against any other regular posts or his services are terminated due to any other reason by the competent authority . Therefore , this document makes it clear that in November , 2007 , 181 posts of peons stands abolished and Office of Regional Coordinators have also been abolished . This document highlights that at present Government of India has no intention to continue the scheme referred above . As testified by Shri Thakur , the scheme has come to an end on 31-3-2003 .
17. In the light of facts notice above it would be considered as to whether disengagement of Shri Chander Dutt amounts to retrenchment has been defined by clause ( oo ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act ) as follows :
" oo retrenchment " means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever , otherwise than as a punishment inflicted byway of disciplinary action but does not include
( a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or
18. Termination of service of a workman as a result of non- renewal of contract of employment between the employer and the workman on its expiry or termination of contract of employment in terms of stipulation contained in the contract of employment does not fall within the ambit of retrenchment Sub - clause ( bb ) was inserted in Clause ( oo) of Section 2 of the Act , with effect from 18-8-1984 . When a contract of employment between the employer and the workman provides mode and manner of termination of service , such termination of service has been excluded from the definition of the retrenchment. When contract of employment between the employer and the employee does not specify the period of employment for which workman was employed or when there is no stipulation in such contract providing mode and manner of termination of service , provisions of Sub - clause ( bb ) of Clause (oo) of Section 2 of the Act will have no application . Termination of service of casual workman on daily wages will not fall within the ambit of Sub - clause ( bb ) of Clause ( oo) of Section 2 of the Act , since " contract of employment " is referable to the contract other than engagement of casual workers on daily wages . " Non- renewal of contract of employment " pre - supposes an existing contract of employment which is not renewed . Even in respect of a daily wager a contract of employment may exist , such contract being from day to day . The position , however , would be different when such a contract is in reality camouflage for a mere sustaining nature of agreement , but the mode of daily wager is adopted so as to avoid the rigours of the Act. Sub- clause ( bb ) of Clause (oo) of Section 2 of the Act does not contemplate to cover a contract such as of a daily wager and is rather intended to cover mere general class of contracts where a regular contract of employment is entered into and the termination of the service is because of non - renewal of the contract . Sub - clause ( bb) is in the nature of an exception to Clause (oo) of Section 2 of the Act and has to be construed strictly so as to secure a just and fair deal to the workmen while adjudicating termination of service of a workman for non- renewal of the contract of employment on expiry of the time stipulated in the contract of employment .
(b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in thatbehalf; or
19. In S. M. Nilajakar [ 2003 ( 4 ) SCC 27 ] the Apex Court laid down conditions to be satisfied when termination of service of a workman , employed in a scheme or project may not amount to retrenchment . Those conditions are extracted thus:
(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non - renewal of the contract of
1. that the workman was employed in a project or scheme of temporary duration , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) /
6345 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
of services of the claimant amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Clause ( oo ) of Section 2 of the Act. 2. the employment was on a contract , and not as a daily wager simpliciter, which provided inter- alia that the employment shall come to an end onthe expiry of the scheme or project ;
end 3. the employment came to an simultaneously with the termination of the scheme or project and consistently with the terms of the contract , and
4. the workman ought to have been apprised or made aware of the aforesaid terms by the employer at the commencement of employment.
22. When services of the claimant amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Clause ( oo ) of Section 2 of the Act , the management is under a bounden duty to follow provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act , in case claimant has rendered a continuous service for a period of one year . " Continuous Service " has been defined by Section 25B of the Act . Under Sub - section ( 1 ) of the said section , " continuous service for a period " may comprise of two period viz. ( i) uninterrupted service , and ( ii ) interrupted service on account of ( a) sickness , ( b) authorized leave, ( c ) an accident , ( d ) a strike which is not legal , ( e) a lock- out , and ( f) a cessation of work that is not due to any fault on the part of the workman , shall be included in the "continuous service" . Sub -section (2 ) of the said section introduces a fiction to the effect that even if a workman is not in " continuous service " within the meaning of Clause ( 1) for a period of one year or six months , he shall be deemed to in continuous service for that period under an employer if he has actually worked for the days specified inclauses ( a) and (b ) thereof. In Vijay Kumar Majoo ( 1968 Lab.I.C.1180 ) it was held that one year's period contemplated by Sub - section ( 2 ) furnished a unit of measure and if during that unit of measure the period of service actually rendered by the workman is 240 days , then he can be considered to have rendered one year's continuous service for the purpose of the section. The idea is that if within a unit period of one year a person had put in at least 240 days of service , then he must get the benefit conferredby the Act . Consequently, an enquiry has to be made to find out whether the workman has actually worked for not less than 240 days during a period of 12 calandar months immediately preceding the retrenchment .
20. Engagement of a workman as a daily wager does not by itself amount to putting him on notice that he was being engaged in a scheme or project which was to last only for a particular length of time or upto occurrence of some event and therefore he was well aware that his employment was short lived. Contract of employment entered into by the workman with his employer would result in a notice to the workman on the date of the commencement of the employment itself that his employment was short lived and as per terms of the contract the same was liable to be terminated on the expiry of the contract and the scheme or project coming to an end . The workman may not , therefore , complain that by the act of the employer his employment was coming to an abrupt termination . To exclude termination of a scheme or project employee from the definition of retrenchment it is for the employer to prove the aforesaid ingredients so as to attract the applicability ofClause (bb ) aforesaid . In the case in hand , the claimant was engaged as a daily wager against the scheme of the management. However, it was not provided in order of his appointment that the scheme was to last for a period of two years and his appointment would come to an end as and when the scheme terminates . It was not brought to his notice that his employment was co-terminus with N. R. Scheme . Order Ex . MW1 / W7 or Ex . MW1 / W1 no where spell that his appointment would come to an end on termination of the scheme .
21. There is other facet of the coin . Shri Thakur project that the project/scheme in which claimant was employed came to an end on 1-3-2000 . Claimant high - lights that his services were dispensed with on 30-4-04 . These facts were not disputed by the management . Rather it is projected that a notice was served on the claimant on 29-3-2004 informing him that his service would no longer be required in May , 2004. Therefore , it is obvious that the services of the claimant has not come to an end , on termination of the scheme, in which he was employed . The management has not been able to establish applicability of Sub - section (bb) ofClause ( oo ) of Section 2 of the Act in present controversy. Consequently, case is not covered within the exceptions provided in the definition of the retrenchment . Termination
23. At the cost of repetition , it is said that Chander Dutt was retrenched on 30-4-04. He was engaged by the management on 18-5-2001 . Management no where claims that his service was interrupted for any reasons other than those detailed in Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 25 B of theAct . The management projects that the claimant rendered 294 days actual service in a calendar year from 30-4-04 to 1-5-2003 . He was entitled to authorised leave of46 days in that calendar year . Therefore , it is emerging over the record that he rendered continuous service of 340 days in the calendar year from 30-4-04 to 1-5-2003 . In the same manner , he rendered continuous service of 316 days in the calendar year from 30-4-03 to 1-5-2002 . He rendered a continuous service of 320 days in calendar year from 30-4-02 to 11-5-2001 . Consequently it is emerging over the record that the claimant has rendered continuous service of one year in all calendar year except the calendar year from 30-4-2001 to 7-1-2001 . The claimant could satisfy that service rendered by him answers the definition of continuous service as contained in Section 25 - B of the Act .
3484 G1/10-26 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27. 1932
24. The claimant had rendered continuous service of a year, as contemplated by Section 25 - B of the Act . Chander Dutt projects that his services were dispensed with on 30-4-2004. He presents tirat retrenchiment compensation was nos paid to him , which fact was not dispelled by the management . The management was under an ebligation to pay him compensation for reirenchiment at the time of retrenchment . Payment of retrencament compensation is a condition precedent to a valid order of retrenchment . Precedents in Bombay Union of Journalists ease [ 1964 ( 1 ) 13351 ] , Adaishwar Laal [ 1970 Lab . C.936) and B. M. Gupta [ 1979 ( 1 ) LLE 168 ) announce that subsequent payment of compensation cannot validate an invalid order of retrenchment . As retrenchment compensation was not paid to Chander Dunt , consequently action of the management fails within the mischief of Section 25 - F ofthe Act .
25 Services of the workman were retrenched without payment of retrenchment compensation . It is well settled that in a case of wrongful retrenchment , dismissal or discharge, normal rule is to award reinstatement in service . Flowever in Uma Devi ( 2006 ( 4 ) see !! the Apex Court considered the proposition as to whether the persons who got employment without following of a regular procedure or even from the back door or on daity wages can be ordered to be rmade permanent in their posts , to prevent regolar recroftmeat to the posts concerned . Catena of decisions over the subject were considered and the court declined the submissions of the workinen to be made permanent on the posts which were held by them in temporary or ad -hoc capacity for a fairly long spell . The Court ruled thus :
"With respect , why should the State be allowed to depart from the normal rule and indulge in temporary employment in permanent posts ? This tourt , in our view , is bound to insists on the State making regular and proper recruitments , and is bound not to encourage or shut its eyes to the persistent transgression of the rules of regular recruitment . The direction to make permanent - the distinction between regularization and making permanent , was not emphasized here - can only encourage the State , the model employer , to flout its own rules and would confer undue benefits on a few at the cost of many waiting to compete . With respect the directions made in Piara Singh [ 1992 (4 ) SCC 118 ] is to some extent inconsistent with the conclusion in para 45 of the saidjudgement therein . With great respect , it appears to us that the last of the directions clearly runs counter to the constitutional scheme of employment recognized in the earlier part of the decision . Really , it cannot be said that this decision has laid down the law that all ad- hoc , temporary or casual employees engaged without following a regular recruitment procedure should be made permanent . "
26. In P. Cuandra Shekhara Rao and others (2006 7 SCC 488 ) the Apex Court referred Uma Devi's Case ( Supra)
[ PAR : 1 St 3ti ) ] with approval . It also relied the decision in a Uma Kani [ 2004 ( 7 ) SCC 112 ] and ruled that no regularization is permissible in exercise of statutory powers confered in Article 162 of the Constitution , if the appointments have been made in contravention of the statutory mies . In Somveer Singh [ 2006 ( 5 ) SCC493 the Apes. Cour bied that appointment made without following due przedure cannot be regularized in Indian Drugs & Pharmere tools Ltd. [ 2007 ( 1 ) SCC 408 ] the Apex Court rettered th and announced that the rules of recruitment caput he relaxed and court cannot direct regolarisation of tempревагу employees dehors the rules , nor can it direct sat of service of a temporary employeetwhether called casual, ad- hoc or daily rated employce ) от раутент оf color salaries to them .
27 In Uma Devi ( supra ) it was laid that when a pe enters a temporary employment or get engagemet as contractual or casual worker and the engagement is based on a proper selection as recognized by the relevant rules or procedure , he is aware of the consequence of the appointment being temporary , casual or cupran nature . Such a person cannot invoke the theoreta gate expectation for being confirmed for the por appointment to the post could be made ani . a proper procedure or selection in any copeemed consultation with the public service commission, thetheory of legitimate expectation cannot be stor advancedby temporary, contractual or captai perta It cannot also be held that the State held at se while engaging these persons either to continue they bote they are or to make them permanent . The stat constitutionally make such a promise It is aisits that the theory cannot be invoked to seek reliet ... Feing made permanent in the post. In view of those pre cha neither continuance nor regularisation of services the claimants can be ordered , since it would amount tick door entry into government job .
28. Whether Chander Dutt could be regularized deng case ofGurmail Singh and Dharkar Lal as a preceders such a proposition arose before the Apex Court in ima Devi (supra) , wherein the Apex Court ruled that reeplauzation of an employee similarly situated , may by the Stat in past shall not be treated as a precedent if it was done only pursuant to judicial direction , either of the Administrative Tribunal or of the High Court and in some cases in the Apex Court . It would be expedient to reprodu ethe the so laid, which is extracted thus:
"Though, there is a case that the State had made regularization in the past of similarly situated employees , the fact remains that such regularization were done only pursuant to judicial directions , either oftheAdministrative Tribunal or of the High Court and in some casesby this Court . Moreover the invocation of the doctrine of legitimate expectation [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
6347
industrial adjudicator with discretionery jurisdiction to give " such other relief to the workman " in Neu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require . where for some valid reasons it considers that reinstatement with or without conditions will not be fair or proper
30. Since retrenchment of Chander Dutt is holdtobs wrongful , this Tribunal has to award compensation to the workman in lieu of his reinstatement . No defuite yardstic & for measuring the quantum of compensation is avadatie In S , S. Shetty [ 1957 ( II ) LLJ 696 ] the ApexCat indicated some relevant factors which an adjudicator his to take into account in computing compensation in lieu of reinstatement, in the following words :
"The industrial Tribunal would have to take into account the terms and conditions of empicyment , the tenure of service , the possibility of termination ofthe employment at the instance of either party, the possibility of retrenchment by the employer or resignation or retirement by the workman and even of the employer himself ceasing to exist or of the workman being awarded various benefits including reinstatement under the terms of future awards by Industrial Tribunal in the event of industrial disputes arising between the parties in future ... In computing the money value of the benefits of reinstatement , the industrial adjudicator would also have to take into account the present value of what his salary , benefits etc. would be till he attained the age of superannuation and the value of such benefits would have to be computed as from the date when such reinstatement was ordered under the terms of the award .
Having regard to the considerations detailed above , it isimpossible to compute the money value of this benefit of reinstatement awarded to the appellant with mathematical exactitude and the best that any tribunal or court would do under the circumstances would be to make as correct as estimate as is possible bearing, of course in mind all the relevant factors pro and con" .
cannot enable the employees to claim that they must be made permanent or they must be regularized in service though they had not been selected in terms ofthe rules for appointment . The fact that in certain cases the court had directed regularization of the employees involved in those case cannot be made use of to found a claim based on legitimate Expectation . The argument if accepted would also run counter to the constitutional mandate , the argument in that behalf has , therefore , to be rejected . It was then contended that the rights of the employees thus appointed , under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution , are violated . It is stated that the State has treated the employees unfairly by employing them on less than minimum wages and extracting work from them for a pretty long period in comparison with those directly recruited who are getting more wages or salaries for doing similar work . The employees before us were engaged on daily wages in the department concerned on a wage that was made known to them . There is no case that the wage agreed upon was not being paid . Those who are working on daily wages formed a class by themselves , they cannot claim that they are discriminated as against those who have been regularly recruited on the basis of the relevant rules . No right can be founded on an employment on daily wages to claim that such employee should be treated on a par with the regularly recruited candidate , and made permanent in employment , even assuming that the principle could be invoked for claiming equal wages for equal work. There is no fundamental right in those who have been employed on daily wages or temporarily or on contractual basis , to claim that they have a right to be absorbed in service . As has been held by this court , they cannot be said to be holders of a post , since a regular appointment should be made only by making appointments consistent with the requirements of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution . The right to be treated equally with the other employees employed on daily wages , cannot be extended to a claim for equal treatment with those who were regularly employed . That would be treating unequals as equals . It cannot also be relied on to claim a right to be absorbed in service even though they have never been selected in terms of the relevant recruitment rules . The arguments based on Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution are therefore overruled . "
29. Here in the case , Chander Dutt was engaged in violation of recruitment rules . No advertisement was made , nor a test was conducted when he was engaged by the management . Reservation policy was also not followed. Hence his reinstatement would amount to perpetuate a wrong engagement in service . Where a case falls in any of the exception to general rule , the industrial adjudicator has discretion to award reasonable and adequate compensation , in lieu of re - instatement . Section 11A of the Act vests the
31. A Divisional Bench of the Patna High Court in B.Choudhary Vs. Presiding Officer , Labour Court , Jamshedpur ( 1983 ) Lab.I.C. 1755 ( 1758 ) deduced certain guidelines which have to be borne in mind in determining the quantum of compensation viz : ( i ) the back wages receivable; ( ii ) compensation for deprivation of the job with future prospect and obtainability of alternative employment; ( iii ) employee's age ; ( iv ) Length of service in the establishment ; ( v) capacity of the employer to pay and the nature of the employer's business ; ( vi ) gainfui employment in mitigation of damages ; and ( viii ) circumstances leading to the disengagement and the past conduct. These factors are only illustrative and not exhaustive . In addition to the amount of compensation , it is also within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to award interest on the amount determined as compensation . Furthermore , the rate of such interest is also in the discretion of the Tribunal . Reference can be made to Tabesh Process , Shivakashi ( 1989 Lab.I.C.1887 ) .
6348
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2351.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स शिपस् कैण्टीन आई एन एच एस , अश्विनी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/34 ऑफ 2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -14011 / 15/ 2005- आई आर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 25th August , 2010
S.O. 2351. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/34 of2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. Il Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Ship . Canteen INIIS , Ashwani and their workman , which wrereited by the Central Government on 25-8-2010 .
(No. LC / 15 / 2005 - IR( DU ) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy . ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 , MUMBAI
... 1st Party
PRESENT A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 2 /34 of 2006 Employers in relation to the management of M / s . Ships Canteen INHS Ashvini The Commander , M/ s. Ships Canteen INHS Ashivni , Colaba, Mumbai 400 005. Versus
y
Their Workman Shri Ravikumar Shriramgopal Trivedi , C/ o Maharashtra Employees Union , Kokani Pada, Kurar Village , Malad ( East ) , Mumbai 400 097 APPEARANCE : ...2nd:
32. In Assam Oil Co. Ltd. [ 1960 ( 1 ) LLJ 587 ] the Apex Court took into account countervailing facts that the employer had paid certain sums to the workmen and her own earning in the alternative employment and ordered that " it would be fair and just to direct the appellant a substantial sam as compensation to her " . In Utkal Machinery Ltd. ( 1966 ( 1 ) LLJ 398 ] the amount of compensation equivalent to two years salary of the employee awarded by the industrial Tribunal was reduced by the Supreme Court to an amount equivalent to one year salary of the employee in view of the fact that she had been in service with the employer only for 5 months and also took into consideration the unusual manner of her appointment at the instance " of the Chief Minister of the State . In A. K. Roy [ 1970 ( 1 ) LLJ 228 ] compensation equivalent to two years salary last drawn by the workmen was held to be fair and proper to meet the ends of justice . In Anil Kumar Chakaraborty [ 1962 ( II ) LLJ 483 ] the Count converted the award of reinstatement into compensation of a sum of Rs.50000 as just and fair compensation in full satisfaction of all his claims for wrongful dismissal from service . In O. P. Bhandari [ 1986 ( II ) LLJ 509 ] . The Apex Court observed that it was a fit case for grant of compensation in view of reinstatement . The Court awarded compensation equivalent to 3.33 years salary as reasonable . In M. K. Aggarwal ( 1988 Lab.I.C.380 ) , the Apex Court though confirmed the order of reinstatement yet restricted the back salary to 50 % of what would otherwise be payable to the employee . In Yashveer Singh ( 1993 Lab.I.C.44 ) the court directed payment of Rs . 75000 in view of reinstatement with back wages . In Naval Kishor [ 1984 ( 11 ) LLJ 473 ] the Apex Court observed that in view of the special circumstances of the case adequate compensation would be in the interest of the appellant . A sum of Rs . 2 lac was awarded as compensation in lieu of reinstatement . in Sant Raj [ 1985 ( II ) LLJ [ 9 ] a sum of Rs . 2 lac was awarded as compensation in lieu of reinstatement . In Chandu Lal ( 1985 Lab.I. C. 12225 ) a compensation of Rs . 2 lac by way ofback wages in lieu of reinstatement was awarded . In Ras Bihari (1988 Lab.I.C.107) a compensation of Rs.65000 was granted in lieu of reinstatement , since the employee was gainfully employed elsewhere . In V. V. Rao ( 1991 Lab.I.C.1650 ) a compensation of Rs . 2.50 lac was awarded in lieu of reinstatement .
For the Employer Forthe Workmen Ms. Manda Loke , Advocate Mr. F. R. Mishra , Advocate Date of passing the Award: 2-7-2010
AWARD
The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L - 14011 / 15 / 2005 - IR( DU) dated 6th June , 2006 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following to this Tribunal for adjudication :
33. In view of above propositions , case of the workman is to be considered . Claimant served the management from 18-5-2001 till 30-4-2004 . He served the management for about 3 years . He was a daily wager employee , which employment does not confer a right on the post held . Taking into account all these aspects , besides the fact that retrenchiment compensation was not paid to him, I am of the view that an amount of Rs . 25000 would be appropriate compensation for him . Amount of compensation would be paid by the management within a period of one month from the date when award comes into operation . An award is , accordingly , passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dr. R. K. YADAV , Presiding Officer
"Whether the action of the management of M / s . Ships Canteen INHS Ashwini Mumbai in terminating the [ भागII-खण्ड 3 (ii)]
6349
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
services of Shri Ravi Kumar , Sales Helper , w.e.f. 30-5-2005 , on the protext of workman's voluntary resignation , is justified? If not, to what relief the workman Shri Ravi Kumar is entitled ? "
2. Claim statement is filed by 2nd Party at Exhibit 6 which is replied by 1st Party by filling Written Statement at Exhibit7. Issues are framed a Exhibit 10 .
3.Meanwhile both parties requested to place matter in Lok Adalat and by pourshis at Exhibit 22 it was placed before the Lok Adalat . Hence , the order:
ORDER
Reference is disposed off in terms of Exhibits 22 and 23 in the Lok Adalat .
Mumbai ,
2ndJuly, 2010
A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer
Exh . No. 22
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI Misc Application No.
REFERENCE No. CGIT 2/34 of 2006
Exh . No. 23 Proceedings of the Lok Adalat held on 2nd July, 2010 Present :
Mr. M. B. Anchan , Advocate
Mr. S. B. Kadam , Advocate
Ms. Pooja Kulkarni , Advocate
REFERENCE No. CGIT 2/34 of 2006
Ships Canteen
Vs.
Mr. Ravi Kumar
APPEARANCE :
ForManagement : Miss Manda Loke , Advocate. ForWorkman : In person
BETWEEN
M/ s. Ships Canteen INHS Ashvini , Colaba, Mumbai 400005.
... 1stParty employer AND
Shri Ravi Kumar
C/ o Maharashtra Employees Union, Kokani Pada, Kurar Village , Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 ...2nd Party Workman Mostrespectfully sheweth :
I Mr. Ravi Kumar 2nd Party workman do not want to proceed further in the aforesaid reference hence I would like to withdraw the reference nconditionally.
*Further this Hon'ble Court be please to direct the employer pay of the clues which are pending with them .
In view of the above this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to allow me to withdraw the reference unconditionally.
For this act of kindness I shall duty bound ever pray.
Advocate to the party workman 2nd party workman say of the Ist party . I have no objection for withdrawal of Ref. No. CGIT 2/34 of 2006. We are landing over the cheque bearing 332424dt . 1-7-2010 for an amounting to Rs . 98970 as & by way of settlement subject to surroundering I. Card by one employee Ravi Kumar, The workman filed an application dated 16-6-2010 Ex. 22 for withdrawal of the reference . It was kept today for settlement before Lok Adalat . By way of settlement the management has handed over a Cheque No. 332224 dated 1st July, 2010 for Rs . 98970 in favour ofMr. Ravi Kumar the workman. The workman has retrenched the Original Identity Card to the management .
The matter is forwarded to the Tribunal for Award as persettlement.
Dated 2-7-2010 .
नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2352.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एफ. सी.
6350
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART 11 -SEC. 3 (ii ) ] आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्याययालय , नं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 275/1994) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/190/1994- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th August, 2010
S.O. 2352. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 275/ 1994) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. I , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
[No. L- 22012 / 190/ 1994- IR(C- II) ] D.S.S. SRINIWASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
Biharsharif, w.e.f. 8-1-86 and 1-11-85 respectively as per the order of District Manager , FCI , Patna . The concerned workmen were in continuous employment till May , 1990 butfrom June, 1990 they were stopped from attending their job and their name were also struck off from the attendance register without any notice pay and compensation even after completion of much more than 240 days service within 12 calendar months as required under sec . 25F read with section 25B ofthe I. D. Act , 1947. Since no notice or notice pay and compensation was paid to them at the time of retrechment as such they will be deemed to continue in their employment from the date of their retrenchment i.e. 1-6-90 with full back wages and other benefits besides their regularisation as has been done in case of other casual workmen whose services have already been regularised as watchmen in 1988-89 , but the case of the concerned workmen was not considered by adopting unfair labour practices . The demand of the concerned workmen , is for reinstatement with full back wages in the regular scale of class- IV workmen and for regularisation of his service as class- IV workmen . There are vacant post of regular class- IVworkmen and management is still regularising the service ofother workmen.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.1 , DHANBAD
In the matter of a reference u/ s . 10( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of 1. D. Act.
REFERENCE NO . 275 of 1994
In such circumstances , it has been prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award holding that the action ofthe management of FCI is illegal and unjustified and the management be directed to reinstate the concerned workmen in service with full back wages .
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India. And
Their Workman
PRESENT : SHRI H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer
APPEARANCES :
For the Employers : Shri A. Thakur, Dy.Manager .
For the Workman Shri V. Kumar , Representative.
State: Bihar
Industry : Food
Dated, the 8-8-2010
AWARD
By Order No. L-22012/ 190/ 1994- IR(C- II) dated 26-10- 1994 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
"Whether the action of the management of FCI in retrenching the concerned workman Shri Aprendu Kumar and Amrit Paswan in violation of Industrial Disputes Act or compelling them to be away from duty for long period is legal and justified ? If not ,to what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled to ? "
2. Written statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workmen stating that they were employed by the management of FCI as casual workmen to work as messenger , water carrier and watchmen at sugar centre
3. Written statement has been filed by the management stating that the management does not have any Food storage depot at Biharsharif in the state of Bihar of its own . There exists one Food Storage Depot of the M/s. Bihar State were Housing Corporation for the purpose of storage of Foodgrains procured by the aforesaid corporation from the different market or transported from intermediate godowns . The management of FCI entered into an arrangement with M/s . Bihar State Warehousing Corporation for alloting certain space for storage of food- grains during the period of transit from the different places to Biharsharif. As per aforesaid arrangement the handling of goodgrains , after arrival of that godown , used to be doneby the management of B.S.W.C. for which they were paid handling charges besides rent for providing space at their godown. There was no requirement of engagement of any casual labour in connection with sweeping and cleaning of foodgrains either at the trucks or inside the godown as a result there was no sanction of post engagement of casual labourers at Biharsharif. For the purpose of maintaining liason with Bihar State Warehousing Corporation the management has established oneroom office under the control of Incharge alongwith 2/ 3 staff and few class - IV employees . There was no requirement of any casual labour for engagement of at that office and therefore there was no approval of campetent authority for such engagement . It has been submitted that the Incharge of the office exceeded its jurisdiction and [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6351 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
in case of the concerned workman will be more than 240 days , therefore they are entitled for regularisation .
7. The management argued that no workman has completed 240 days attendance in any calendar year , so that they may be regularised . It has also been argued that the concerned workman cannot be regularised in any way .
engaged two concerned workmen as casual labour for sweeping and cleaning one room office and bringing the water and storing the same in pitcher for drinking purposes . The concerned workmen were paid from the contingent fund allotted to the site office at Biharsharif and in that process they worked during the period from 1986 to till May , 1990. They were neither appointed by any competent person nor were stopped from their duties by the management . It is submitted that the concerned persons can not be treated as regular workman of corporation in absence of any job for them . However , the management may consider their cases in future against requirement for their engagement as a casual labour when the ban of Central Government for recruitment of manpower in the corporation will be lifted.
Under the facts and circumstances it has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass the award holding that the concerned workmen are not entitled to any relief.
8. In this respect the statement of the workman WW- 1 is very material . He has stated in cross - examination that contractor was engaged for loading and unloading of goods at railway siding . In godown the work was done by the contractor and the staff of the management . The godown was under the Government of Bihar . This statement shows that he was working with the contractor . So , it cannot be taken that he is the employee of the management . No document has been filed on behalf of the workmen which may show that they have worked for more than 240 days in any calendar year . The documents which have been filed on behalf of the concerned workmen show that they have not completed 240 days attendance in any calendar year .
4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement .
5. The concerned workman produced WW - 1 , Aprendu Kumar , who has proved the documents , Exts . W- 1 to W- 11 ,
9. Another argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman that there is vacancy with the management which can be filled by regularising the concerned workmen . But they have not completed 240 days attendance in a calender year , so they cannot be regularised even then there is vacancy in the management as per Ext . W-2 & W-2/2 .
The management has produced MW - 1 , Amar Nath Pathak , and MW-2 , Maksudan Prasad . Management's documents have been marked as Exts . M - 1 to M - 7 .
Another argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workmen is that as per Circular ( Ext . W - 1 ) they are entitled for regularisation . But as per act which is in force which gives 240 days attendance for regularisation .
6. Main argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman is that Aprendu Kumar and Amrit Paswan were employed by the management of FCI as casual class- IV workmen to act as messenger - cum- water carrier at sagar centre , Biharsharif w.e.f. 8-1-86 and 11-8-85 respectively as per order of District Manager , FCI , Patna . They cointinued in employment till May , 1990 , but from June , 1990 they were stopped from attending their job and their names were also struck - off from the attendance register and that too without any notice or notice pay and compensation , after completion of much more than 240 days service within 12 calendar months . It amounts to retrenchment under sec . 25 - F of the I. D. Act .
The management accordingly referred AIR 2006 Supreme Court 1806 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down- Constitution of India , Arts . 16 , 162 , 226 , 14 , 39 (d ) public employment - Appointment dehors due process of selection envisaged by constitutional scheme- Confers no right on appointee - Regularisation of daily wager , temporary/ contractual employees appointed in violation ofconstitutional scheme Right of Court/ executive would not extend to directing regularisation to be treated as permanence in service- Fact that employee has continued for long , irrespective-That apart , principle of equal pay for equal work cannot also be applied for giving relief of permanency- Doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be invoked by such employees merely because in past state had regularised similarly placed employees .
10. In view of the above facts and law , the action of the management of FCI in retrenching the concerned workmen , Aprendu Kumar and Amrit Paswan in violation ofIndustrial Disputes Act or compelling them to be away from duty for long period is legal and justified. Accordingly , the concerned workman are not entitled to any relief.
This is my Award .
As such their retrenchment is void- abinitio , therefore they are entitled to get reinstatement with back wages . It is submitted that the regular class - IV employee is getting about Rs . 4,000 per month , besides other benefits . It has also been submitted that there are vacancy of the management and other persons have been regularised . It has been argued that Aprendu Kurnar has worked in the year 1989-216 days and in 1988-218 days and same is the position of the other workman . As per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court , after adding 52 sundays , 12 second saturdays and 16 paid holidays which comes to 80 days and after addition of 80 days the number of working days
H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer 6352
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 26 अगस्त, 2010
"Whether the action of the management of CPWD , Chandigarh in not regularizing the services of Shri Govind Kumar Verma, Electrical Khalasi w.e.f. 16-3-2000 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? " का.आ. 2353.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42012/15/1988-आईआर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेल्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010
S.O. 2353. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industria! Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/ 2004) of the Central Government Industriai Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 2 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
[No. L-42012/ 15 / 1988 - IR(C - II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II, CHANDIGARH.
Present: Sri A.K. Rastogi , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 74/2K4
Instituted on 17-03-2005
The Zonal Secretary , All India CPWD ( MRM ) Karamchari Sangathan (Regd) . CPWD Store Building, Sector 7 - B , Chandigarh .
Applicant
Versus
The Executive Engineer , Central Public Works Department , Chandigarh Central Electrical Division , Kendriya Sadan , Sector 9 - A , Chandigarh .
Respondent
In the reference the Zonal Secretary of All india CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan (Regd ) , CPWD Store Building, Sector 7 - B , Chandigarh ( hereinafter referred as the Karamchari Sangathan ) and the Executive Engineer , CPWD , Chandigarh Central Electrical Division, Kendriya Sadan , Sector 9 -A, Chandigarh are the only parties . Workman Govind Kumar Verma , Electrical Khalasi is not a party in the reference . The claim statement , however , has been filed by the Karamchari Sangathan and Govind Kumar Verma both . As per clairn statement the Karamchari Sangathan is a registered union of worknien of the management and claimant no . 2 i e . Govind Kumar Venna is a member of it . The claim statement is being preferred on behalf ofGovind Kumar Verma . The case of the claimant is thatGovind Kumar Verma (hereinafter reierred as clasmant no. 2) was employed on Contract Labour Systern as Khalasi in Central Electrical Division . Sub Division No.2 CPWD , Kendriya Sadan , Sector 9 -A , Chandigarh w.e. 1. 16-03-2000 by the management and he is continuing as such . He has been working under the direct supervision of the management . Ministry of Labour vide notification no. 690 dated 31-07-2002 prohibited the employment of contract labour in the process operation or work specified in the Schedule mentioned in the Offices/ Establishments of CPWD, Ministry of Urban Development and Employmen! The post of Air Conditioner Operator is included in the said notification . The claimant no . 2 has been discharging his duties for the last more than seven years without any interruption and has completed more than 2-40 days ' service in each year. He is entitled to regularizanon of his services and pay equal to other similarly situated workmen . Since he is not being paid wages equal to other employees therefore, he is being discriminated . Any contract between the CPWD ie. principal employer and the contractor is sham and devised to deprive the claimant/ workman of the benefits available to him under the Act . Claimant no. 2 is entitled to be regularized on the sanctioned post of Kilalasi and also to the same pay as being paid to the regular employees . It has been prayed accordingly.
APPEARANCE
For the workman
... Sh . Som Dutt Sharma, Adv.
... Sh . G.C. Babbar . Advocate .
For the Management
AWARD
Passed on 10th August , 2010
The management in its reply denied that claimani no.2 is a workman under the Act as he was not engaged by the management and nor was paid the wages. It has also been stated that the claimant Karamchari Sangatan is not a recognized body and not competent to represent the claimant no.2 as the later not being an employce of the management cannot be a member of the clannant no i. The contractor has not been impleaded in the ciain and it is liable to be dismissed on this coupt . The management is not aware nor can it be verified that clairmans no. 2 was actually engaged by the contractor It is denied that he Central Government vide Notification No. L-42012/ 15 /88- IR(CM- II)) Dated 25-02-2005 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 sub section ( 1 ) Clause (d) and sub section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
6353 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932.
Industrial Dispute No. 45/2007
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section ( I ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 147), between the Management of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. and theirworkmen]
BETWEEN
The General Secretary
1stParty Petitioner Union
NLC United Workers Union No. 13 , Mahatma Gandhi Road Block No. 24
continuously worked for 240 days . It has also been denied that the contract was camouflage to defeat the provisions oflaw. It has been further stated that claimant cannot equate himself with regular employees of the department who have been recruited through proper source of recruitment and he cannot claim pay at par with the regular employees . As perGovernment policy, the work of petty nature can only be got performed through the contractor and no direct labour can be engaged by the management . Also there is no vacant post less sanctioned post of workman available with the management for absorption /regularization of claimant no.2 nor is the claimant no.2 entitled for the same .
Neyveli-6078901
AND
TheDirector
2nd Party Respondent
Neyveli Lignite
CorporationNeyveli -2
APPEARANCE :
Forthe Petitioner
Sri V. Ajay Khose
For the Management:
M /s. N.A.K. Sarma , N.Nithyanandam While the reference was during the process of evidence an application was moved by the Karamchari Sangathan that the workman is not interested in the matter and the same be allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice of the right of the workman . In view of this application , which is signed by the Advocate for the Karamchari Sangathan and for claimant no.2 also , the reference is answered against the workman . Let two copies of the award be sent to the Central Government for further necessary action and record be consigned after due compliance .
AWARD ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2010
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L- 22012 / 53 / 2007 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 22-08-2007 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
का.आ. 2354.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एन . एल . सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the action of the management of NLC , Neyveli in effecting the promotion after more than 2 years of appeal against the demotion is legai andjustified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"
[सं. एल -22012 /53 /2007- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010
2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as I.D. 45/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statements as the case may be .
3. The averments in the Claim Statement briefly read asfollows :
S.O. 2354. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 45/ 2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
[No. L -22012 / 53 / 2007 - IR ( CM --- 11 ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Monday, the 16th August, 2010 Present : A.N. JANARDANAN
PresidingOfficer
The workman T. Pitchaimuthu , Grade - ll B 'Technician a member of Treasurer of AICCTU spoke in various meetings ofthe Joint Action/ Struggle Committee of different unions demanding various demands in organized street meetings . Infuriated at it the Respondent charged petitioner among others as if they made false and damaging remarks against the higher officials which was denied in the explanation dated 04-08-1999 . With a retired judge as Enquiry Officer an enquiry was held in which the workman and 2 witnesses were examined on the petitioner's side and 2 witnesses on the Respondent's side . The petitioner was not cross- examined . While so , the Enquiry Officer left off from the enquiry without a finding . New Enquiry Officer persuaded the workman totender apology . On 17-05-2000 the workman expressed regret in writing assuring good conduct in future 3484 G1/10-27 6354
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27, 1932
which was recorded but no report given . The Disciplinary Authority issued Show Cause Notice on 6-7-2000 proposing punishment of demotion for 1 year and to continue in the same lower category if he shows no improvement . The petitioner's appeal/ representation/ explanation submitted on 16-8-2000 was ordered only on 24-2-2003 in which the punishment was modified into censure which was put into effect atter I year observation period. On completion of 4 years as Technician Grade- II from 1-7-1996 he should have been promoted to Technician Grade-I w.e.f. 1-7-2000 . Buthe was promoted only on 10-10-2003 w.e. f. 1-9-2003 thereby postponing promotion by3 years and 2 months . He was also not granted annual increments and 2 special increntents after revocation of suspension. Though his request for annual increments and special increments were granted on 18-5-2004, promotion w.e.f. 1-7-2000 was not granted . in conciliation the petitioner asked for promotion from 1-8-2000 which was not given. Action of the Management is illegal. Censure cannot be taken as a punishment to postroue promotion . The period of 14 days suspension having been treated as leave he could havebeen given promotion on the due date . even if employee is under suspension or facing disciplinary action and any punishment is in currency it cannot be a ground for postponing promosion when disciplinary action was delayed on account of Management. Punishment of censure ought to have been imposed in the order dated 6-7-2000 itself on which dace the suspension was revoked and the workman should have been given promotion at least w.e.f. 1-1-2001 . Managerment backed out from granting the agreed promotion w.e.f. 1-1-2001.
4. The Counter Statement contentions briefly read as follows:
The reference is not specific for incomplete particulars as to in relation to whont it is made . Assuming that it relates to T. Pitchaimuthu, it is denied that there has been vindictiveness towards him on account of his Trade Union activities . The misconduct in the Charge memo issued to him is "that Sri Pitchaimuthu , CPF 36341 , Tech . - II BLMV Section, Autoyard/ Transport Department had participated in meeting unauthorizedly within the boundaries owned by NLC Management on various places without obtaining permission of the Management and had addressed the gatherings consisting of outsiders accusing certain top officials including Directors of the company with false allegations and defying them and their reputations . He has also made many sarcastic remarks defaming the repute and functioning of senior officers of the company making incriminating statements against these officials " . It is denied that Enquiry Officer persuaded him to tender apology. He expressed regret No demotion order had been passed or put into operation. Final order was issued on 24-2-2003 under which only censure was awarded . By reason of punishment of censure promotion is to be considered after lapse of 6 monthss from the date of punishment provided hisCCRs for the preceding 3 years are good . Accordingly , he was promoted on 01-09-2003 . The workman on
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 11-10-2003 prayed for treating suspension as penalty and to cancel censure . There has been neither delay nor denial of promotion . During pendency of departmental proceedings the workman is not entitled to promotion. Revocation of suspension does not entitle the workman for promotion pending disciplinary action . Treatment of suspension as if no suspension made does not arise. He is not exonerated from the Charge . Awarding penalty retrospectively is not legal. The claim is to be dismissed.
5. The evidence consists of oral evidence of WWI and EX.W1 to EX.W14 on the petitioner's side and evidence of MWI and EX.MI to EX.M6 on the Management's side.
6. Points for consideration are:
(i) Whether effecting of promotion after more than 2 years of appeal against demotion is legal and justified?
(ii) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?
Points ( i) and ( ii)
e 7.Perused records , documents and written argoncan filed by the Respondent's counsel . No argaments wete advanced on behalf of the petitioner The orgun . behalf of the Respondent are that the empie vec holding of meetings but had only demed that he mad any accusation against top officials. In the en workman participated fully which was not challenged ite voluntarily admitted charges and expressed tegrea found guilty. His representation dated 168-200 , to the Show Cause Notice dated 6-7-2000 was seexing lenient treatment . He was allowed and continued to work on the same post . The representation is not an appeal . Final decisionwas taken on 24-2-2003 finalizing the departmental proceedings . As per applicable instructions regarding promotions as evidenced by EX.M3 and EX.M4 settement dated 16-3-1979 and memo dated 29-7-1980 respectively the workman was promoted on expiry of 6 months from the date of censure w.e.f. 1-9-2003 . He was not eligible for promotion till 24-2-2003 . There cannot be an appeal on 16-8-2000 against the censure punishment dated 24-2-2003. Therepresentation dated , 16-8-2000 is reply to Show Cause Notice . The petitioner has clung to the claim under a misconception.
8. In the absence of an argument advanced on behal ! ofthe petitioner on bestowing careful scrutiny of tinc records and documents I am led to the conclusion that the him of the petitioner is misconceived . It is well to point out that EX. W5 representation dated 16-8-2000 itself has been ambiguously couched with regard to nomenclature in the Claim Statement indicating that petitioner itself may not be certain whether the same is an appeal , representation or explanation as in Para 19 ofthe Claim Statement. According to the Respondent/Management it was only explanation against the show Cause Notice ; and not an appeal . The final order passed was only on 24-2-2003 . Therefore , the petitioner is not entitled to promotion from any date anterior 6355 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
petitioner . So to say , that point remains without any elucidation . Hence no finding is possible to be given against the Respondent . It is mistake of fact to allege that the promotion was more than 2 years of appeal against de.notion . There is no demotion order at ali passed agarNE him . The petitioner is therefore not entitled to ang coties
9. The reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by hin corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on thi day the 16th August , 2010) .
A. N. JANARDANAN , PresidingOfficer
Witnesses Examined :
: WW!, Sri T.
For the I Party/ Petitioner
Pichamuthu
MW!, Sri O. S.
For the 1 / Party / Management :
Arivu
Documents Marked :
On the Petitioner's side
Date
Ex.No.
Description
Ex. W1
19-07-1999 Charge Memo cum suspension order issued by the II Party
EX.W2
04-08-1999 Explanation given by Mr. Pitchaimuthu to the li/ Party Management .
EX.W3
17-05-2000 Letter of Mr. Pitchaimuthu to the EnquiryOfficer
EX.W4
06-07-2000 Show Cause Notice issuedby the II Party
EX.W5
16-08-2000
Disciplinary Authority Appeal filed by Mr. Pitchaimuthu before the
EX.W6
24-02-2003 Final Order passed by the II / Party
EX.W7
10-10-2003 Promotion order given by the II Party to the I Party
EX.W8
11-10-2003 Representation given by Mr. Pitchaimuthu to the II Party Management
EX.W9
20-11-2003 Representation given by Mr. Pitchaimuthu to the II Party Management
21-04-2004
EX.W10
Order of the II Party Management
EX.Wil
21-02-2004 Representations given by the I Party to the II Party
EX.W12 18-10-2004 Industrial Dispute raised by the I Party Union before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour
EX.W13
inpoint oftime than 1-9-2003 . Going by EX.M3 Settlement and EX.M4 Memo the workman is entitled to be promoted on expiry of 6 months from the date of censure , viz ; 24-2-2003 . So reckoned there is no delay in the promotion granted . From the very ambiguous averment in the Claim Statement as appeal / representation/ explanation dated 16-8-2000 to the Show Cause Notice dated 6-7-2000 it is clear that petitioner itself is not sure about the nature of the said proceeding . It cannot be an appeal because it is an explanation to a proposed action which had not then attained finality. It is discernibly a representation in reply to the Show Cause Notice . Hence there is no question of effecting of promotion more than 2 years of appeal , because there has been no appeal vis - a - vis any appealable order or action . The Show Cause Notice dated 6-7-2000 only proposed demotion against which a reply was called for from the workman . Petitioner submitted Ex . W5 reply to the same which is not an appeal , against any appealable action or order since the Show Cause Notice , perse , is not appealable . Petitioner's misconception that the Show Cause Notice is a final action and that what he filed is an appeal is mistake of fact . Even so , an adjudication is not to rest on cryptic expressions if the real dispute is deducible from the averments in the relevant pleadings which is a position settled by various judicial pronouncements . So viewed , having regard to the specific averment in the claim statement the grievance of the workman is that promotion has been delayed due to the fault of the Management and none else . It is alleged that even if an employee is under suspension or facing disciplinary action and any punishment is in currency a promotion cannot be postponed when disciplinary action was delayed on account of fault of Management . According to the Management , no promotion was denied , which is true . Again according to the Management the promotion has not been delayed but which tends not to be wholly true . A pertinent question arises: why there was so much delay for passing final order only on 24-2-2003 despite representation dated 16-8-2000 was received in reply to the Show Cause Notice proposing demotion which in final order was limited to censure . While the workman has averred that promotion was postponed due to the delay in the disciplinary action on account of the fault of the Management taking undue time from 16-8-2000 , date of representation to Show Cause Notice dated 6-7-2000 till 24-2-2003 , the date of final order of censure case of the Respondent is that there is no delay which is not true . Discernibly, there has been delay which is called in question . Though the final order is in terms of Ex.M3 and Ex.M4 , it is germane to consider why there occurred delay for passing the final order only on 24-2-2003 for which there is no reply from the Management which has not given an answer to the exact question . It is pertinent to ask if the final order had been passed much earlier in point of time than 24-2-2003 whether the workman would not have obtained his promotion earlier ? But on the aspect of delay in the culmination of the disciplinary action only by 24-2-2003 , for whose fault the same occurred there is no evidence except the bold and unspecific allegation of the
Conciliation minutes reported by the Commissioner of Labour 6356
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II -SFC. 3 (in) ] EX.W14 09-08-2006
AWARD
Rejoinder filed by the I Party Union before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour
On the Management's side
Ex . No.
Date
1. Central Government , MOL , New Delhi vide notification no . L42012 /22 / 2004 / ( IR ( CM - II ) dated 10-12-0-4, has referred the following reference for adjudication to this tribunal.
Description
EX.MI
06-07-2000 Provisional Show Cause Notice
FX.M2
24-02-2000 Final Order imposing punishment
EXM3
16-10-1979
2. Whether the action of the Superintendent . Archeological Survey of India , Agra in terminating the services of Sri Kunwar Pal son of Sri Sona , stone cutter with effect from 20-1-2002 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ?
Proceedings containing instructions on time bound promotion scheme
EX.M4
29-07-1980 Proceedings containing instructions on time bound advance scheme
EX.M5
19-07-1999 Proceedings initiating disci- plinary action against ist Party
3. Briefly stated facts of the case is that claimant Sri Kunwar Pal had been in the employment of the opposite party for the last twelve years and had also worked at Fatehpur Sikri and Sikandara buildings . It is stated that he had been removed by the opposite party with effect from 30-01-02 . It is stated that after illegal removal of the services EX.M6
11-10-2003 Representation submitted by the 1st Party .
नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2355 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्कोलोजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जा केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल -42012/22/2004 आईआर( सीएम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010
S.O. 2355.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 1/2005) ofthe Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Archaeological Survey of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
of the workman opposite party engaged one Sri Kishan Singh son of Dharam Singhn ghe of workman and thereafter the opposite part employed hundreds of persons list of those personen feed. It is stated that the opposite party commits forgery tire secords . It is stated that the work is being taken at different building but name shown for some other building and even the opposite party change the name , and parentage of the workman in the muster roll . It is stated that the opposite party without any reason or ryhm , without any inquiry and even without making payment of retrenchment compensation notice or notice pay in lieu of such notice too has not been afforded to the workman at the time of removal, It is against the principle of first come last go . It is stated that an FIR was lodged against the opposite party for committing forgery which is still pending . It is stated that the opposite party acts according to its own whims while preparing seniority list inasmuch as in place of old workers names of new workers are mentioned . It is stated that two kinds of muster roll is prepared by the opposite party one known as Kuchcha and the other as Pucca in which opposite party commits forgery. It is stated that the nature of work under the opposite party is of permanent . Work is being carried out through the whole year . It is stated that for the maintenance of hi ... cal [ No.1-42012 /22/ 2004 - IR ( CM - II) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAC , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH, HJS , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL - TRIBUNAL - CUM LABOR COURT,
KANPUR
Industrial Dispute No. 1 of 2005
building , their preservation and conservation etc., the workman continued in the service of the opposite party since long but instead of absorbing him in service and declaring permanent , the opposite party engages the services of several new persons ignoring the hard fact that it is against law and rules of natural justice . The opposite party being annoyed terminated the service of the workman with effect from 31-1-2002 in an illegal manner .
In the matter of dispute between
Sh . Kunwar Pal s / o Sri Sona
R/ o Nagar Sikri 4 Hissa Fatehpur Sikri , Agra . AND
4. Claimant has filed along with claim statement paper no . 10 / 5-17 which is list of persons working at different monuments of opposite party , paper no . 10 / 18-19 is FIR , Paper no . 10 / 20-24 is the Gazette Notification , paper no . 10/25 is a letter not legible , paper no . 10/26 is a photocopy of letter paper no.10 /27 to 10/79 are the photocopies of certain papers which are not legible .
The Superintending Archaeologist , Archaeological Survey of India, Agra Circle , 22 Mall Road , Agra .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6357 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
=
cannot take shape of proof unless proved otherwise . Opposite has specially contended that the claimant was engaged as a casual labour for a short period for intermittent type ofwork . It is stated that there is no type of permanent work when , Government of India sanctions an estimate for a particular project , the work is completed up to the consumption of estimate .
8. I will again emphasize that primarily burden lies on the claimant to proof his case with solid and cogent evidence , but he did not turn up in, the court or the tribunal to prove his case despite giving him sufficient opportunities . Therefore , the claimant has failed to prove his case .
9. I have gone through the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in 2005 LLR 1229 Allahabad High Court in between Vinod Kumar v / s PO Labour Court .
10. It has been held while challenging termination of service it is for the workman to prove wrongful termination and on the failure to do so the , workman will not be entitled to any relief in a dispute before the labour court .
11.The burden of proof lies heavily on the workman who has sought a reference of his dispute for adjudication by the labour court .
12. Therefore , considering all the records facts and circumstances of the case it is held that the claimant is not entitled for joining the duties and as such he is entitled to no relief. Therefore , reference is decided against the workman and in favour of the management .
RAM PARKASH, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2356.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी. आई . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1268/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/99/2005- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010 5. Opposite party has filed their written statement alleging there in that Archaeological Survey of India is a sovereign department of Government of India and not an Industry to be controlled within the parameters of ID Act , 1947. The department undertakes the responsibility of preserving and conserving numerous ancient monuments and archaeological sites spread over the length and breadth of the country. To fulfil this august and arduous task, this department engages casual labours or specific job and for specific duration of work so that the conservation works are completed within the stipulated time period . It is stated that the government allocates budget for various departments every year and the concerned department execute their works according to the availability of funds . It is stated that while undertaking such works , priorities are laid down and works are taken up accordingly . Works are undertaken as long as the funds allocated for the sanctioned estimate is exhausted . It is stated that once the funds exhausted or the work is over the work is closed . It is stated that the applicant had been engaged for a short duration during June 01 to July 2002 as a casual stone cutter at different monuments under Fatehpur Sikri sub circle of the establishment . He has never worked at Sikandara Sub circle as alleged . It is stated that the applicant was never appointed on any post and as such question of termination of the applicant does not arise . He was engaged for highly intermittent and casual nature of work and as soon as the job ended he was no more engaged . Since it , is not a termination therefore question of applicability of any of the provision of the Act does not arise . Question of senior or junior in this case does not arise because when ever any work arises and the department sanctions the estimate the work is taken up and the workers available are engaged to complete the work in time such work is not of permanent nature but is of specific casual nature . It is stated that whenever funds are exhausted job is stopped or when job is finished work is stopped . It is stated that the opposite party engages workers for purely temporary nature of conservation works and since the works are for limited periods so the workers are not engaged for the whole year . Opposite party has further stated that FIR has been lodged on false ground . It is stated that the temporary status with effect from 31-1-2001 cannot be made applicable to the applicant since the said scheme was no more in vogue on this date . A copy oforder of the Apex Court dated 29-4-2002 is enclosed. On the basis of above pleadings it has been prayed that the claim of the workman is devoid of merit hence is liable to be rejected.
S.O. 2356. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 1268 / 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
6. Claimant did not adduce any oral evidence in support of his claim . Claimant has alleged that his services were terminated due to malafide and vindictive- action of the opposite party.
7. To prove this fact a heavy burden lies on the claimant but he did not discharged this burden . Pleadings
[No. L - 22012/99 /2005 - IR ( CM - II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer 6358
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, No. I , CHANDIGARH
Case I. D. No. 1268/06
The President FCI ( Handling ) Worker's Union , 8654, Arakashan Road , Pahar Ganj , New Delhi - 110055 .
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010 S.O. 2357.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 25 / 2009 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 2 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
...Applicant
Versus
1. The District Manager , FCI , District --- Karnal (Haryana) , Karnal .
2. The Senior Regional Manager , FCI , Regional Office , Haryana , Sector 31 , Chandigarh .
[No. L - 22011 / 24 / 2008 - IR ( CM - II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II ,
... Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Workman:
None
Shri N. K. Zakhmi , Advocate .
For the Management:
AWARD
Passed on 27-7-2010
Central Govt . vide Notification No. L- 22012/99 /2005- IR ( CM - II ) , dated 14-6-2006 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :
"Whether the action of the management of FCI in ordering the recovery from 88 workers for causing demurrage loss is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workers are entitled to ? " 2. The case is taken up for hearing . None is present onbehalf of FCI . Learned Counsel for the management is present . The case was initially called / taken at 11 AM today . No one was present at that time . The case was called several times at intervals but none is present . At this stage , I have no option otherwise to return the reference to the Central Govt . without adjudication for non prosecution . Let Central Govt . be approached for publication of award and thereafter file be consigned to record room .
27-7-2010 .
G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 2357.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -22011 / 24/ 2008- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX , DELHI - 110032
Dated: 28-07-2010 I.D. No. 25/2009
In the matter of dispute between:
Shri Jagdeo Mandal ,
R/ o Village & P.o. Ghevra
...Workman Delhi - 110081
Versus
The District Manager ,
Food Corporation of India,
Shakti Nagar,
New Delhi - 110007
...Management
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L -22011 / 24 / 2008 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 23-03-2009 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication :
"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in changing the date of birth of their workman Shri Jagdeo Mandal from 6-7-1949 to 06-07-1947 and retiring him on 31-07-2007 is legal and justified ? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled ? "
Ever since this reference has been received in this Court , the workman has not been attending the Court . Registered notice was also sent to him but the said notice also could not be served and it has been reported that his address is incomplete . As the workman is unbothered to pursue his case ever since the reference has been received in this Court , there is no way out except to pass a no- dispute award which is passed accordingly . Referencce No. ID 25/2009 stands disposed off accordingly.
Dated : 28-7-2010
SATNAM SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2358.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी. बी.
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -23012/3/2007- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस . श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th August , 2010 S.O. 2358. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 78 / 2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, No. 2 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Divn . BBMB , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 26-8-2010 .
[ No. L - 23012/3 /2007 - IR(CM - II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SH . SATNAM SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT II , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI - 110 032
I.D. No. 78/2008
Dated : 9-8-2010
In the matter of dispute between:
Shri Ash Karan ( Truck Cleaner) , C/ o Shri Manoj Kumar Deshwal , Secretary, Bhakra Beas Employees Union , Punjabi Bagh , Delhi- 110035
...Workmen
VERSUS
Sr. Executive Engineer , Op . & MTC, Divn . BBMB , Panipat
6359 2. Statement of claim was filed by the workman on 30-4-2008 . He last attended this court was on 25-7-2008 and thereafter he never attended the court . The management filed its written statement dated 14-5-2010 on 18-5-2010 . The workman did not collect the copy of the same . As the workman has not been attending the court in this case since 20-8-2008 , he evidently is not interested in the out come of this reference .
Under these circumstances there is no way out except to pass a no dispute award in this case . No dispute award accordingly is passed in this case and the reference sent by Government of India stands disposed off accordingly. Dated: 9-8-2010 .
SATNAM SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 27 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2359,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं मैसर्स नैसिल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012 / 162/2000- आईआर ( सी- I ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th August , 2010 S.O. 2359. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 72/ 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2 , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s . Livewel Aviation Services and NACIL , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 27-8-2010 .
[No. L - 11012 / 162 /2000 - IR ( C - I ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL- TRIBUNAL No. 2 , MUMBAI PRESENT
...Management
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 23012 / 3 / 2007 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 28-01-2008 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
"Whether the action of the management of BBMB , Ballabgarh in not allowing pay scale of Rs . 325- 495 w.e.f. 01-08-1984 to the workman Shri Ash Kararı , Lorry Cleaner is legal and justified ? If not to what relief is the workman entitled ? " A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT - 2/ 72 of 2002 Employers in Relation to the Management of Livewel Aviation Services
... First Party No. 1 1. Navjeevan Society, 12th flr , 6L Building No. 3 , Lamington Road, Mumbai -400 008
2. The Regional Director , Indian Airlines Ltd. ( NACIL ) , Mumbai -400 029
... First Party No. 2 6360
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ) V/ s .
THEIR WORKMEN
The General Secretary ,
Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh , 25 , Ibrahim Mansion , Parel , Mumbai 400 012
Second Party
APPEARANCE :
FOR THE EMPLOYER:
(1stParty No. 1 )
Mrs. A.V.Purav , Advocate
(1stParty No.2)
M/ s. Bhasin & Co. , Advocates
FOR THE WORKMEN Mr. A.B. Anchan , Advocate .
26-05-2010 .
Date of reserving the Award:
12-07-2010 .
Date of passing the Award:
AWARD
The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under:
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L - 11012 / 162 / 2000 - IR ( C - I ) dated 30th September , 2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
" क्या मैसर्स लिववैल एविएशन सर्विसेज के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा सूची में दिए गए 50 कर्मकारों की सेवाएं समाप्त किया जाना विधिवत्, उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं , तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र हैं ।"
2. Claim Statement is filed by the 2nd Party , through its Secretary at Exhibit 9 stating and contending that , the Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh is a Trade Union , registered under the Trade Unions Act , 1926 and the concerned workmen , whose names appear in the annexure to the Order of Reference are the persons who have enrolled themselves as member of the 2nd Party and therefore 2nd Party is entitled to represent them in the present Reference . It is case of the 2nd Party that , 1st Party has been employing several persons in the categories of Cabin Cleaners and Sweepers in different categories of Airport ( Operation Area) of the Indian Airlines Ltd. and at such other places of work as required at Mumbai Airport thus the 1st Party ( 1 ) is the contractor and 1 st Party (2) is the principal employer of the concerned workmen. It is case of the 2nd Party that , the concerned workmen are appointed in a regular manner and continued since years " together " . It is case of the 2nd Party that , the work of cleaning and other incidental work is of perennial nature. It is case of the 1st Party No.1 & 2 have been continuing to commit an unfair labour practices by not employing these concerned workmen in regular manner or on a regular basis of the principal employer and there is no security of employment to the concerned workmen though they have been working for several years and they are not being made permanent . It is case of the 2nd Party that , it make a demand for regularization of
services of the concerned workmen with the principal employer . It is case of the 2nd Party that , instead of regularizing the services of the concerned workmen, the contractor started taking signatures of the concerned workmen on the blank letter heads of the company by misrepresenting them that , all these letters will be sent to the Indian Airlines for regularization . It is case of the 2nd Party that , after obtaining the signatures Ist party ( 1 ) started terminating the services of the concerned workmen , It is case of the 2nd party that , the said terminations are without following due process of law and therefore bad in law . It is case of the 2nd Party that , it submitted a demand on 30-4-1998 for reinstatement of 33 workmen for the sake of convenience. It is case of the 2nd Party that , on 8-6-1998 it submitted another demand letter in respect of eight workmen and it also submitted another demand letter dated 22-6-1998 in respect of 9 workmen . It is case of the 2nd Party that , since the said demands were not responded by the Ist Party No.1 and 2 , it therefore approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C ) , Mumbai vide letter dated 26-6-1998 . It is case of the 2nd party that , the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) , Mumbai , issued notices to all the concerned parties and the 1st Party ( 1 ) in its reply dated 11-2-1999 came out with a false case that , it did not terminated the services of the workmen but the concerned workmen themselves resigned from the services of the Ist Party ( 1 ) . It is case of the 2nd Party that , from the dates of termination of the concerned workmen . 2nd party as well as the concerned workmen , approached the 1st party from time to time and made several representations but the Company neither replied the said representations nor informed the workmen about the acceptance of resignation letters . It is case of the 2nd Party that , in the repeated representations , the concerned workmen sent letters to the 1st Party ( 1 ) informing it that , its officers had obtained signatures on the blank papers and demanded copy of the same . It is case of the 2nd Party that, the concerned workmen also sent letters requesting to reinstate them and also informed the Management that if the Management wants to use those signatures for the purpose of resignation letters then, they want to withdraw the resignation letters . It istherefore , case of the 2nd Party that , the termination of the concerned employees is illegal , without following due process of law and therefore bad in law and Ist Party ( 1 ) cannot take advantage of the ignorance of the concerned workmen It is case of the 2nd Party that , the correspondence with the Ist Party clearly shows that , none of the concerned employees had intended to resign from the 1st Party and therefore the alleged letters of resignation cannot be accepted as a documentary proof. It is case of the 2nd Party that , in any way since the concerned workmen had informed the 1st party that they want to withdraw the said resignation letters they are entitled to reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of service . It is case of the 2nd Party that , 1st Party ( 1 ) is enmploying more than 100 employees for principal employer Company | 1st Party (2) ] , 6361 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1st Party ( 1) that, to provide the said services to the various Airline Companies , it engage its own workmen , staff, supervisor , officers , Manager etc. It is its case that, the said workmen /employees of the 1st Party ( 1 ) work as per the directions ofthe 1st Party ( 1) and under the supervision and control of the superiors , Managers of the Company.It is its case that , all the workmen of the Ist Party ( 1 ) have to work and in fact is working for all the Airline Companies to whom the 1st Party ( 1 ) is providing various types of services . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , there is no division of the workmen that , the particular group of workmen will work for a particular Airline Company and as such all the workmen work for all the clients of the 1st party (1). It iscontended by the 1st Party ( 1) that, though the 2nd Party was aware that , the workmen employed by the Company do not work exclusively for anyone Airline but work for all the Airline Companies to whom the services are provided by the 1st Party ( 1 ). It is its case that , it did not wrote a letter to the Indian Airlines for regularisation ofthe services of the workmen with them. It is contended by the IstParty ( 1) that , since the said demand was misconceived, unjustified and untenable , the Indian Airlines did not accept the said demand of the 2nd Party . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , due to firm stand taken by the Indian Airlines , 2nd Party instigated the workmen of the Ist Party (1) to adopt various type of unfair labour practices and the workmen who were affiliated/members of the 2nd Party Union started refusing work entrusted to them and also started insulting Managers and Supervisors by not following their instructions as instigated by the 2nd Party.
therefore the provisions of Chapter V -B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are applicable to the 1st Party (1 ) . It is case of the 2nd Party that, Ist Party ( 1 ) has discontinued the concerned workmen without taking permission from theAppropriate Government and/ or without following the provisions of Chapter V - B of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and therefore the said action amountsto illegal termination and the said termination is illegal , bad in law and void ab - initio and amounts to unfair labour practice . It is case of the 2nd party that , none of the discontinued workman has been paid any compensation and/ or notice pay as envisaged under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , hence , the action of the 1st Party is clearly in violation of Section 25F ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and therefore is void ab - initio . It is case of the 2nd Party that , though the they have been appointed and engaged by the 1st Party ( 1 ) but the concerned workmen were working with the principal employer i.e. Indian Airlines [1st Party (2) ] and seeking regulation in the employment of the principal employer Company and this Hon'ble Tribunal has jurisdiction to and decide the present dispute . It is case of the 2nd Party that , because of the adamant stand of the 1st Party , Assistant Labour Commissioner (Conciliation) submitted the failure report to the Government and the Under Secretary, Government of India , by his letter dated 10-1-2001 inforned the concerned parties that , "there is no dispute". It is case of the 2nd Party that, being aggrieved by the said letter of the Under Secretary , Government of India, 2nd Party approached the Hon'ble High Court by filing Writ Petition No.408 of 2001 and the Hon'ble High Court by its order dated 8-3-2001 directed the Under Secretary to refer the dispute to this Hon'ble Tribunal . 2nd Party , therefore , prayed that , itbe declared that , the discontinuation or termination of the concerned workmen is void ab - initio with direction to the 1st Party (1 ) to reinstate the concerned workmen with benefit of full back wages and continuity of service .
4. Itis contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that, the workers on 28-2-1998 reported on duty at 9.30 a.m. but all of a sudden set of workmen left the work place without any reason alongwith their Airport Entry Passes which they were supposed to return at the end of their duty hours as per the Airport Authority Rules . It is contended by the 1st Party (1) that, due to their sudden stoppage of work the supervisor, Managers including CEO had to work hard to keep the operations on along with other loyal workers who had sense of responsibility. 1st Party ( 1 ) submits that , the said conduct of the set of workmen was totally irresponsible which affected the business and reputation ofthe Isl Party ( 1 ) . It is contended by the Ist Party ( 1 ) that , in fact , if the supervisors and managers had not worked hard on that day, 1st Party ( 1 ) could have lost its valuable customers . It is contended by the Ist Party ( 1 ) that , on 1-3-1998 the said workers were told by its Manager that they should return their Airport Entry Passes while leaving the work place but the workers did not returning their Airport Entry passes and it is its case that , the Manager told the workers if they do not return their Airport Entry Passes , while leaving the work place , the Management will be constrained to inform the Security personnel of Airport Authority as well as to the local Police Station . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , upon this on 12-3-1998 a set of workmen whose names are at Sr. Nos . 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 3. This is disputed by the 1st Party ( 1 ) by filing Written Statement at Exhibit 12 stating and contending that , the dispute referred for adjudication is wholly misconceived, unjustified, untenable and deserves to be rejected in toto. It is case of the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , the present dispute is referred for adjudication on the basis of the demand raised by 2nd Party viz. Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh on behalf of 50 workmen whose services according to the said Union were allegedly termination by 1st Party ( 1 ) . It is case of the 1st Party ( 1 ) that, the services of the concerned workmen are not at all terminated by it but they have resigned from the services on their own . It is contended by the 1st Party (1 ) that, it is providing various types of services viz . Aircraft cleaning (exterior - interior) , baggage handling inside the terminal and ramp side along with all allied services to the Airline Companies . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , it provides such services not only to Indian Airlines (NACIL) but to various other Airline Companies viz . Air India, Jet Airways , Alliance Airways etc. It is case of the
3484 G1/10-28 6362
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 9 and 10 in Annexure " A " to the Statement of Claim approached its Manager , Administration and told him that , the Company , Ist Party ( 1 ) is not required to intimate to any Authority about not returning the Airport Entry Passes as they themselves were not interested to do the work for the Company like Livewel and handed over their resignation letters and returned their Airport Entry Passes to the said Manager and left the services of the Company , 1st Party ( 1 ) . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that, the Manager , therefore , asked the workmen reason for the mass resignation when Mr. Dilip Ahire told him that , they wanted to teach a lesson to the Company, 1st Party ( 1 ) and therefore , they have decided to resign in masses so that 1st Party's work and operations will be hampered. It is its case that , said Mr. Ahire further told the Manager that, their Union is aware that in absence of these employees it will be impossible for the 1st Party ( 1 ) to continue its business and the Union is sure that the 1st Party ( 1 ) will approach 2nd party begging to continue the work . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , its Manager thought that the said worker was not serious and that there is no much substance in whatever was said by him . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , however , on 16-3-1998 i.e. within four days 10 more workmen whose names are at Serial Nos . 1 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16, 17 , 18, 19 , 21 in Annexure ' A ' to the Statement of claim approached the Manager - Admn . and tendered their resignations. It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , the Manager again asked the said workers reason for their mass resignations when Mr. Anil Lokhande told the Manager that they are supporting the workers who have tendered their resignations and that they are not interested to work for the 1st Party ( 1 ) and further told the Manager that the Union has suggested them to resign from the services so that it can teach lesson to the Ist Party ( 1 ) and the Union has given them typed resignation letters . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , Mr. Anand More who is at Serial No.1 , to Annexure " A" to the Statement of Claim worked only for three days and for the reasons best known to him stopped attending the work and as such the demand raised for him is wholly misconceived , unjustified , untenable and deserves to be rejected in toto . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that, Mr. Kondiba Kamble whose name is at Serial No.22 to Annexure ' A ' was working as a Supervisor and his duties were to supervise the work of the workers who were working in his ground who was not employed to do any manual , unskilled , skilled , technical , operational or clerical work but he was employed as a Supervisor to supervise the work of the workmen who were working as utility hand/ cabin cleaners . It is its case that, the salary paid to Mr. Kondiba Kamble was Rs.2800 per month and 12 to 15 workmen are working under the supervision and control of said Kamble . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , thus said Mr. Kondiba Kamble is not a workman as defined under Section 2 ( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, therefore , 2nd Party Union has no right to espouse his alleged grievance before this Tribunal and therefore ,
the demand raised on his behalf is wholly misconceived , unjustified and same cannot be tried before this Tribunal for want of jurisdiction . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , Mr. Nilesh Korde at Serial No.23 in Annexure ' A' to the Statement of Claim assaulted the Manager of the 1st Party and 1st Party , therefore , lodged Police complaint to the Santacruz Police Station on 30-3-1998 and upon enquiries by the Police Mr. Korade returned Airport Entry Pass and tendered his resignation to the Management Administration . It is case of the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , Mr. Ashok S. Naik , at Sr. No.24 to the Annexure ' A ' to the Statement of Claim was reporting for work since 7-4-1990 and he tandered his resignation on 14-4-1998 . It is case of the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , similarly R.D. Gaikwad , at Sr. No.25 to Annexure ' A ' remained absent from duty from 27-3-1998 and tendered his resignation on 24-4-1998 and Mr. Sunilkumar J. Dayal , Sr. No.26 to the Annexure ' A ' was also not reporting for his duties from 6-4-1998 and tendered his resignation on 18-4-1998 and collected his dues on 25-4-1998 . It is case of the 1st party that, Mr. Rajesh R. Pathare , at Sr. No.27 to Annexure " A" was asked to bring Police clearance to renew his Airport Entry Pass , however , he expressed his inability to bring the same and tendered his resignation on 15-4-1998 , Mr. Amardeep D. Choughale at Serial No.28 to Annexure 'A' on 17-9-1997 resigned from the services of the 1st Party (1 ) , Mr. Javed Khan at Sr. No.29 to Annexure ' A ' was not reporting to work from 1-4-1998 and subsequently by his letter dated 20-4-1998 resigned from the services of the 1st Party ( 1 ) . It is case of the 1st Party that , that Javed Khan was issued show cause notice dated 8-4-1998 for his absence from 1-4-1998 . It is case of the 1st Party that , Murli Molekandy at Sr.30 of Annexure ' A ' was also not reporting for duty w.e.f. 1-4-1998 and by his letter dated -20-6-1998 he resigned from his services of the 1 st Party ( 1 ), Rajesh Mandle at Sr. No.31 to Annexure ' A ' was also not reporting for duty w.e.f.4-4-1998 and he tendered his resignation on 21-4-1998 , Mahendra Kamble at Sr. No: 32 of Annexure ' A ' was also not reporting to work w.e.f. 22-4-1998 and submitted his resignation on 29-9-1998 , Vikas Borde at Sr. No.33 of Annexure ' A ' resigned from the services w.e.f. 4-4-1998 . It is further case of the 1 st Party (1) that , Vikram Bodke at Sr. No.1 of Exhibit ' B ' to the Statement of Claim , on 10-6-1998 resigned from his services as he went to visit to his native place alongwith his parents and requested for settlement of his dues which were accordingly settled on 10-6-1998 , Mr. Navin Wagle at Serial No.2 to Annexure ' B ' , Mr. Santosh Shetye at Sr. No.3 to Exhibit ' B ' , Mr. Raju Walmiki at Sr. No.4 to Exhibit ' B ' , Mr. Yogesh R. Gangan at Sr. No.5 to Exhibit ' B ' , Mr. Pravin Sonawane at Sr. No.6to Exhibit ' B ' resigned from the services of the 1st Party ( 1 ) . It is case of the Ist Party ( 1 ) that Suresh Makwane at Sr. No.7 to Exhibit ' B ; also resigned from the services of the Company on his own accord on 15-4-1998 , Himat Gohil at Sr.No.8 to the Exhibit ' B ' had submitted his resignation on 10-5-1998 as he was not [ भाग II-खण्ड3 ( ii) ]
6363 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
statement ofjustification filed before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Mumbai , mentioning the factual position . It is contended by the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , since there was no representation received by it there was no question of replying the alleged representations . It is case ofthe 1st Party ( 1 ) that , acceptance of the resignation letter was given on the resignation letters itself. It is case of Ist Party ( 1 ) that , the submissions of the Union that , the concerned workmen send letters to the Company informing itthat the officers of the Company had obtained signatures on the blank paperspers and therefore demanded copy of the same is wholly false , baseless ; unjustified and untenable and denies the same. Ist Party 1 ( 1 ) denied that , the resignation letters cannot be accepted as a documentary proff as alleged or at all or for the reasons as alleged .
7. It is case of the Ist Party ( 1 ) that, since the concerned workmen have resigned from services of the 1 st Party ( 1 ) and it has not terminated their services submissions of the 2nd Party Union in respect of the alleged permission from ' Appropriate Government ' and applicability of Chapter V - B are wholly baseless , unjustified and irrelevant and denied that any of its action amount to unfair labour practice as alleged and contended that since the concerned workmen resigned on their own there was no question of pay any compensation to them under Section 25- F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and submitted thatmost of the workmen had not worked for one year with the 1st Party ( 1 ) . It is case of the 1st Party that, the submissions of the Union that , the concerned workmen were working with the principal employer i.e. the Indian Airline is wholly misconceived, unjustified and untenable . 1stParty ( 1 ) submitted that , the reliefs prayed for by the 2nd Party Union are baseless , unjustified and untenable and they are not entitled for any relief and prayed that , the reference be rejected.
8. Rejoinder is filed by the 2nd Party Union at Exhibit 13 repeating the same ' story as made in the Claims Statement and denying the contentions raised by the 1st Party(1).
9. 1stParty(2) filed an application at Exhibit 17 prayed that , it be deleted as a party since there is no dispute existing between the Management of Indian Airlines and the Workmenof Livewel Aviation who is a concerned party in this Reference . The said application is to be decided along with the main reference .
keeping well . It is case of the 1st Party that , Rupesh M. Kailash at Sr. No.1 to Exhibit ' C' to the Statement of Claim , Mr. Sanjay R. Kamble at Sr. No.2 to Exhibit ' C' and Santosh S. Karande at Sr.No.3 to Exhibit ' C ' refused to do the assigned work on 18-6-1998 and left the work place by giving back their Airport Entry Passes . It is case of the Ist Party that , subsequently on 20-6-1998 , 18-6-1998 and 20-6-1998 said three workmen resigned from the services of the 1st Party ( 1 ) . It is case of the 1st Party that , Devendra Vadishali at Sr. No.4 to Exhibit ' C ' and Mahendra R. Pendurkar at Sr. No.5 to Exhibit ' C' , Mohammed E. Sheikh at Sr. No.7 to Exhibit ' C ' , Mangesh A. Padwal at Sr. No.8 to Exhibit' C' and Mr. Vivek K Takle at Sr. No.9 to Exhibit ' C' were standing near passway , very close to the taxing air craft and waived their hands in such a manner as if giving signal 10 the aircraft . It is case of the 1st Party that , due to their said signaling the Captain stopped the aircraft which was about to take off. 1st Party ( 1 ) , therefore , asked explanations from the said workmen and instead of replying to the said explanation they stopped coming to duty and subsequently sent their resignations dated 20-6-1998 , 18-6-1998 , 23-6-1998 and 20-6-1998 respectively. It is case ofthe 1st Party ( 1 ) that , Sunkappa M. Pawar at Sr. No.6 to Exhibit ' C' was irregular in his attendance and used to remain absent frequently and when on 18-6-1998 he was asked to explain his irregular attendance he handed over hisAirport Entry Pass and left the work place and subsequently sent his resignation letter dated 20-6-1998 . 5. It is case of the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , under this background Ist Party ( 1 ) has not at all terminated the services of the concerned workmen but the said workmen have resigned from the services on their own and as such there is no termination and the demand referred for adjudication deserves to be answered in negative . 1st Party ( 1) denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim that , it is practicing unfair labour practice or it had obtained signatures by misrepresentations or force or that after obtaining the signatures the Management of the 1st Party ( 1 ) started terminating the services of the concerned workmen as alleged but the concerned workmen had own their own resigned from their services and as such the submissions of the 2nd Party that , the said terminations arewithout following due process of law and therefore bad in law is wholly misconceived , unjustified and untenable and there is no substance whatsoever in the submissions made by the 2nd Party Union.
10. Inview of the above pleadings following Issues were framed , by my Ld . Predecessor , at Exhibit 15 which I answer as under:
ISSUES
FINDINGS
No
1. Whether the signatures of the 50 workmen on blank papers were obtained by the contractor by misrepresentation to the effect at all papers were required for regularisation of service for sending them to Indian Airlines ?
6. It is case of the 1st Party ( 1 ) that , Union by its three different letters raised demand in respect of 50 workmen on the basis that , the services of the said workmen were allegedly terminated by 1st Party . It is case of the 1st Party that, since it had not terminated the services of the workmen and since the workmen had resigned on their own there was no substance whatsoever in the demand raised by the Union and therefore there was no question of responding the said demand in positive manner. It is contended by the 1st party ( 1 ) that, it repliedto the
3484 Gi /10-29 6600
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 / BHADRA 27, 1932
[PART II --- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
Yes
2. Whether the documents ( collectively marked as Annexure A' ) filed by the management of Livewel Aviation Services with the Written Statement are genuine letters of mass resignations ?
No
4. Whether this Tribunal is entitled to grant relief to fifty workmen ( as per list ) against i, vowel Aviation Services in accordance with terms of reference in case it comes in the conclusion that the termination of the services amounted to retrenchment ?
No relief.
4.What relict, il any, can be granted to the worknien in this adjudication ?
REASONS:
ISSUES Nos . 1 & 2 :
dispute referred for adjudication is wholly misconceived , untenable and deserves to be rejected in toto . It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that , the present dispute is referred for adjudication on the basis of the dernand raised by the Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh for its 50 workmen whose services according to Union are terminated by the Company . It is stated by Livewel Aviation Services that , services of these workers were not at all terminated by Livewel Aviation Services but these workers resigned from the services of Livewel Aviation Services . It is case of Livewel Aviation Services that , the case made out by the Union is totally wrong , misconceived and these workers are not entitled for any relief. It is stated by the Livewel Aviation Services that , it is providing services of various types to many Airline Companies . It is case of the Iivewel Aviation Services that , it is attending "ork of cleaning Aircrafts , handling bagage of the cur 's and as such said services are not only provided to indian Airlines (NACIL) but to many other air lines like A'r India , Jet Airways , Alliance Airways and other air lines . It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that , for that it engares it own workers , staff , supervisors , officers and Managers and they are monitoring the work of that typhic attending work of other air lines . It is case of the wel Aviation Services that , the workers of Liveros an Services are working as per the directions ofthe oficas o the Company and they are also controlled it supervisors , officers and Managers . It is case of the werel Aviation Services that , all the workers of the ton.pers are working for various Air line compames whom the Company is providing various types of services It is case ofthe Livewel Aviation Services that , there is no diviston of the workers and it is its case that , it has no controi as alleged by the Union . It is denied that , workers are working for a particular Air line . It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that , the demand was raised by the Union which is not worth considering since it is not justified and not tenable . It is its case that , said demand was rejected by the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) observing that , there is no dispute . It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that , Union filed the case before the Hon'ble High Court and as per directions of the Hon'ble High Court , Government has made the present Reference. It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that , when the workers tendered resignations voluntarily and simply Livewe ! Aviation Services acted upon it , it does not pet Union to approach this Tribunal to set aside said rairation which is done by it on the basis of the rersignation , tendered by the workers and Livewel Aviation Services cannot be directed to reinstate the workers with continuity of service and benefits of back wages .
By this Referenes Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh conberge the action of the Managemem of livewel Asia : Services why dues not permit the workeren to report on work . According an Union said workers work through Livewel Avignon Services with Indian Airlines Lanited , batan Airlines is me prmerpal employer and the Livewrt Aviation Services is the Contractor who provides the services to the Indian Airlines to clean Aircrafts and ether work of perennial nature . According to Union in fact they were working for principal employer i.e. Indian Airlines , however , they are deprived of the remuneration and other facilities which are offered to the regular employees of the . Ledian Aidives Laid for dong same type of work . According to Limon they tried to parsue the demand of the workers for tegularization in Indian Airlines Ltd. However , they were not heard and were not regularised . According to Union thereafter Management et Livewel Aviation Services tempted these workers and obtained signatures on blank papers under the guise of regularisation on the establishment of the Indian Airlines Ltd. According to the Union . Management mistepresented workers and obtained signatures saying that , they will be regularised in the establishment of Indian Airlines Ltd. It is case of the Union that , after obtaining signatures of the workers by Hisrepresenting to them, the Management of Livewel Aviation Services , terminated the services of these workers without following due process of law . According to Union act of Livewel Aviation Services who started terminating the services of these workers is illegal and required to quash and set aside . it is case of the Union that . Management of Livewel Aviation Services cannot take disadvantage of The groutes of the weekers which it obtained under the ase of rezolanation with the Indian Airlines Ltd. So it is prayed that . Livewel Aviation Services be directed to reinstate these workers with benefit of continuity of services and back wages and declare that , the terminations effected by the it is illegal one .
12. This is disputed by the Livewel Aviation Services bs fiing its reply at Exhibit 12 stating and contending that ,
13. Indian Airlines Ltd. which is now known as NACIL (National Aviation Co. of India Ltd. by Application , Exhibit 17 , prayed to delete its name saying that , no case is made out against it and no relief is sought against it .
। भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6365 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18, 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
14. This application was not kept for decision looking to the age of the inatter and said application was kept for hearing alongwith the main Reference . As a result of that , no reply was given by the Indian Airlines Ltd.
Aviation Services i.e. Management of Ist Party ( 1) In the cross he admits that , he was appointed as Cleaning Supervisor . He admit that , Reference is peoding before (" GIT - 1 regarding confirmation of the workers . employment of the Indian Airlines I td . He admire thai, b workers were praying for regularization of their servics with the Indian Airlines Ltd. He admit that de corrents l pages 4 , 6 , 7 , 8, 10 , 12 , 17 , 20 , 24 , 27,28,31,36,37,38,40,41, 43 , 45 , 47 , 49 , 50 and 52 are one and the same which a produced with Exhibit 39 and contems of pa 16 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 30 , 34 and 44 produced with shtabi 34 . admits that , those signatures were taken as per the advice of the Union . He admits that , he cannot give details regarding workers involved in the Reference and he cannot give the exact income of these workers . He also admit that , there is no documentary evidence to show that, these workers tried to get employment and did not got it 11,13,
15A . Then thereafter Livewel Aviation Services filed an affidavit of Siraj Khatri , at Exhibit 42 , in lieu of his examination - in - chief who speaks about the workers who are involved in the Reference and voluntarily resignations were tendered by them . He denies the case of the Union that , workers have not tendered resignations and he states that , workers had tendered their resignations and Livewel Aviation Services simply accepted the said resignations . According to him workers gave resignatons without any coercion or pressure . Then Management examined Ravindra Krishna Kamble by filing his affidavit at Exhibit 46 , in lieu of his examination- in- chief, who states that , he is working there from 1997. He admits that , he was made permanent . He states that , services of these workers were provided to other air lines like Air Qatar , Oman , Pakistan Airways , Air Lanka and Beliver and other Air lines . On that NACIL, closed evidence and filed closing purshis at Exhibit 47.
16. No evidence is led by Indian Airlines and closed its evidence by filing closing purshis at Exhibit 51 .
17. Written arguments are submitted by the Union at Exhibit 52 which are replied by Indian Airlines by filing it at Exhibit53. Later on Livewel Aviation Services filed written arguments at Exhibit 54.
18. Perused written submissions of all i.e. of both the Managements and Union as well as evidence as referred above .
15. Itsupport of the contentions Union filed affidavit ofRajendra Dharmaji Gailwad , at Exhibit 27 in lieu of his examination - in- chief, who repeated the same story as made in the Claims Statement and prayed to direct Ist Party ( 1 ) Livewel Aviation Services to reinstate the workers involved in the Reference with benefit of continuity of service and benefit of back wages . In the cross this witness admit that , Supervisor of Livewel Aviation Services used to regulate their shifts and working as well as working hours . He admits that , Livewel Aviation Services maintain leave record of the workers . Even he admit that , training was given by Livewel Aviation Services . Even he admit that , Livewel Aviation Services was taking disciplinary action against the concerned workers . He admit that , appointment was made by Livewel Aviation Services . He also admit that , he demanded reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages with Livewel Aviation Services . He admit that , he was paid by Livewel Aviation Services . He admit that, work of cleaning air crafts of Indian Airlines Ltd. was assigned to the workers by Livewel Aviation Services . He states that , one of the officers of Livewel Aviation Services compelled the workers to sign on the blank paper by calling worker one by one in the office . He states that , said happened in March/ April , 1998. He states that , no complaint about taking the signature on blank paper was made. Even he admit that , nobody complained to any authority during that period regarding signatures taken on blank papers . Question was put to him that , in the Claims Statement it is state that signature was taken on the letter head of the Company to which he says that , they were asked to sign on blank paper . He states that , 2 members were with him when he signed on the alleged blank papers . He states hat, he did not know who are the employees mentioned at Serial Nos . 11 to 14 , 16 18 and 19. He admits that , he was not on duty on 29-3-1998 . He states that , he learnt about hat incident later on . He states that , he did not know vhether Ashok Naik was absent from duty on -4-1998 or thereafter . He states that , he did not withdraw he resignation contending that , resignation was not endered by him . He admit that , he has not evidence to how that , documents produced from pages 12 to 77 of xhibit 35 were served on the Company . Even he admits nat , he did not Identify the signatures of the workers who re involved in the Reference and for whom he is deposing . le admit that , their prayer to regulate them in the services f the Indian Airlines Ltd. is pending before the CGIT - 1 . On that Union closed evidence by filing closing purshis at xhibit 11 Even thereafter Union filed affidavit of Kondiba Imaji Kamble , in lieu of his examination- in- chief, at Exhibit 8 who states about duties of workers involved in the eference and the relations of the workers with Livewel
19. In the instant case there are 2 Managements one is of Livewel Aviation Services as 1st Party ( 1 ) and other one is Indian Airlines Ist Party (2) . It is pertinent to note that , initially NACI was made a party . However , by filing Applicationat Exhibit 17 it prayed to delete its name saying that , no relief is sought against it . Even prayer of Union is regarding regularization of the workers with Management No.1 i.e. Livewel Aviation Services and no relief is sought by the Union against Indian Airlines i.e. NACIL in this Reference . Besides one Reference is pending about 6366
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010 /BHADRA 27 , 1932
[PART II - SEC . 3 (6 ) regularization of workers with Indian Air Lines in CGIT No. 1 , Mumbai . So I feel there is no point in keeping Indian Airlines ( NACII. ) as a party in the Reference. So I allow the application of NACIL and delete its name from the Reference .
their services by regularizing them with Indian Airlines Ltd. does not arise . Even there is no stay in the presen Reference to that effect . On the contrary in the presta Reference , Union says that , Livewel Aviation Services be directed to reinstate them . No relief is sought by against Indian Airlines Ltd. ( NACIL) .
20. It is case of the Union that , signatures of the workers involved in the Reference were obtained by misrepresentations that , they will be regularized in the establishment of Indian Airlines . However , case of the Livewel Aviation Services is that , these workers tendered resignations voluntarily. As far as signatures of the workers who are involved in the Reference is concerned , case made out by the Union appears rather shaky one . In the Claims Statement , Union says that , signatures of the workers were taken on the letter head of Livewel Aviation Services and in the depositions it is stated that signatures were taken on blank papers . In the arguments Union made out the case that , signatures of the workers were taken by misrepresenting them that , they will be regularized in the services of the Indian Airlines Ltd. That means signatures were taken is admitted fact . It is case of the Union that , signatures were obtained from the workers by misrepresentations . It is also case of the Union that , signatures were taken on blank papers and it is also case of the Union that signatures were taken on the letter head of theCompany.
23. Livewel Aviation Services states that , since these workers tendered resignations and since it acted upon said resignations , question does not arise to regularize them . Besides case of the Livewel Aviation Services is that , mos: of the workers did not work for more than one year and most of the workers worked for short period . It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that , they did not work for more than 240 days to regularize them. It is case of the Livewel Aviation Services that the workers involved in the Reference had tendered their resignations voluntarily. As far as this contention is raised , no case is made out by the Union and in support of is ease on filed affidavits of2 persons who are examined hough there are number of employees involved in the Roces e which is 50 or so . No details are given of the workers . Nothing as staten about their qualifications , their nature of auendance to claim permanency . When ail these things are absent in my considered view , stand taken by Livewel Aviation Services appears that , these workers have tendered resignations and the same have been accepted . Since stand taken by the Union on that point is shaky and not sticky one , I conclude that , resignations given by the workers are genuine and not farce .
Issues Nos . 3 and 4:
24. By this Reference , dispute of signature is sent here for adjudication . As observed above signatures given by the workers is not seriously disputed by them . No specific ground is made out as to why they signed and as to why they tendered resignations ? As stated above at one stage they say that it was obtained on blank paper and at one stage they state that , it was obtained on letter head of the Company by misrepresenting that , they.will be regularized in services of Indian Airlines Ltd. Whhuse are different stands which are contrary to each other reveals that , signatures are given by the workers . Besides that , they did not complained about the signatures and they did not complaint about the act of Livewel Aviation Services . When they did not complained about the act of Livewel Aviation Services and kept silent in my considered view , workers involved in the Reference are not entitled for any relief. So I answer these Issues accordingly and pass the following order:
ORDER
21. Union made out 3 different cases regarding signatures of the workers . At one place it states that , signatures were taken on blank papers . That means signature was taken without discussing anything with the workers and that possibility cannot be ruled out and even case made out by the Union is that signatures were taken on misrepresentations that they will be regularized with Indian Airlines . That means signatures were taken and it was given by the workers after discussions . But according to Union it was taken by misrepresentation . Said stand of the Union reveals that its case is that, signatures were given of the workers by misrepresentations that their services will be regularized. Fiowever , witness of the Union admit that , they have not coomplained about the signature taken . Witness admit that , he did not approach any authority about the signatures obtainedby Livewel Aviation Services and even he admit that , he did not withdraw the resignations . That means various stands are taken by the Union by various reasons reveals that , they are not sure about their own case . All is clear that signatures were taken . But no complaint was made about it . We have to accept that those signature were voluntarily and free . Besides this case of the Union is that , Reference is pending with the CGIT - 1 where they are claiming that , they be regularized with Air India and their sign "res wet.. taken and it is pending with CG - 1 . Momha .
Reference is rejected with no Order as to its costs . Mumbai ,
12th July , 2010 .
22. When issue of regularizetion is pending then prayer prayed in the present Reference to regularize them
A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली , 27 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2360.---औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एम.टी.एन.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.- II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 182/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-8-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल -40012 / 88/97- आईआर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 27th August , 2010
S.O. 2360.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 182/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of MTNL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 27-08-2010 .
[No. L-40012/ 88 / 97 - IR ( DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL IN THE COURT OF SH . SATNAM SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER, No. II , DELHI - 110032
I.D. No. 182/1998 Dated: 10-08-2010
In the matter of dispute between :
Shri Raj Kumar ,
FlatNo. 592 , Group - III , Pocket C, DDA , Janta Flat , Hastsal ,
Workman New Delhi - 110044
Versus
S.D.O ( P - II ) ,
Hari Nagar Telephone Exchange , MTNL Mayapuri Phase - II , Community Centre New Delhi
....Management
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L - 40012 / 88 / 97 - IR ( DU ) dated 17-08-1998 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication with its corrigendum dated 09-09-1998 .
"Whether the action of the management of MTNL , In terminating the services of Shri Raj Kumar is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
6367
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010 /भाद्र 27 , 1932
2. Statement of claim was filed by the workman in Oct 1998. Written statement was filed by the management in Feb ' 1999. Replication was filed by the workman on 05-03-1999 . Thereafter the workman filed his evidence on hisaffidavit in Sep ' 2002. Cross examination of the workman was completed in Nov ' 2004. He also examined another withness as WW2 in this case . Subsequently workman sought permission to adduce additional evidence and he was granted permission to do so by my learned predecessor . The workman filed his additional evidence on affidavit .
3. Later on the case was transferred from CGIT - cum- L/C - 1 to CGIT- cum - L/ C - II vide order dated 11-02-2008 of the Ministry of Labour & Employment . After transfer of this case to CGIT- cum-L /C - II , the workman appeared on 31-07-2008 & the case was adjourned for cross examination of the workman to 09-09-2008 . Thereafter the workman appeared once on 27-10-2008 and stopped coming to the court thereafter . Today i.e. on 10-08-2010 none is present from the side of the workman . Like wise management also remains unpresented and none is present from the side of the management as well . As the workman is not attending this court since 30-12-2008 it becomes evident that he is not interested in the out come of this case .
Under these circumstances there is no way out except to pass a no dispute award in this case . No dispute award accordingly is passed in this case and the reference sent by the Government of India stands disposed off accordingly.
Dated 10-08-2010
SATNAM SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 30 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2361. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 सितम्बर , 2010 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:
" जिला कण्णूर के पैयन्नूर म्यूनिसिपलिटी में राजस्व ग्राम कोरम में आने वाले क्षेत्र । "
[सं. एस-38013 / 33/2010 - एस.एस. 1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th August , 2010
S.O. 2361. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st September , 2010 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and 6368
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 18 , 2010/ BHADRA 27, 1932
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Chapter- V and VI [ Except Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 . and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the follwoing areas in the State of Kerala namely :
"The areas within the Revenue Village of Koram in Payyannur Municipality of Kannur District . "
का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 सितम्बर , 2010 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:
" जिला कोज़िकोड के कोयलान्डी तालुक में वियूर क्षेत्र। " [No. S - 38013 /33 /2010 - S.S - I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2010
[सं. एस -38013/32/ 2010 - एसएस -1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 31st August , 2010 का.आ. 2362. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 सितम्बर , 2010 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियम करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात् :
क्रमांक
तहसील जिला
राजस्व ग्राम का नाम
हदबस्त संख्या
S.O. 2363 .-- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st September , 2010 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter - V and VI [ except sub - section ( i) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the follwoing areas in the State of Keral namely:
1
83
फगवाड़ा
चहेडू
कपूरथला
"The Areas within the revenue villages of Viyyoor in Quilandy Taluk of Kozhikode District . " 2
84
महेडू
फगवाड़ा कपूरथला
3
85
-हरदासपुर
फगवाड़ा कपूरथला
[No. S - 38013 /32/2010 - SS - I ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2010 [सं. एस -38013 /31 / 2010 - एस.एस. 1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर संचिव
New Delhi , the 31st August , 2010
का.आ. 2364.- केन्द्र सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 ( यथासंशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में , श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय के प्रशासकीय नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को , जिनके न्यूनतम 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :
क्रम संख्या कार्यालय का नाम
1.
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , क.भ.नि.सं. , भुवनेश्वर S.O. 2362.- In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st September , 2010 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter - V and VI [ except sub - section ( i) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Punjab namely :
2.
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , क.भ.नि.सं. , गुलबर्गा
District
S. No.
Tehsil
Had BastNo.
Name of the Village
3.
उप - क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , क.भ.नि.सं. , दुर्गापुर 1
Chaheru
83
4.
Phagwara Kapurthala
उप- क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , क.भ.नि.सं. , हावड़ा 2
Maheru
84
Phagwara Kapurthala
5.
उप- क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , क.भ.नि.सं. , बोम्मसंद्रा 3
Hardaspur 85
Phagwara Kapurthala
6.
उप- क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , क.भ.नि.सं. , ब्रहमपुर [No. S - 38013 /31 /2010 - SS -I ]
7.
S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy .
आंचलिक प्रशिक्षण संस्थान , क.भ.नि.सं. , पूर्वी अंचल , कोलकाता
नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 2363.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों
[ सं. ई -11017/1 /2006 - रा.भा.नी. ] के.एम. गुप्ता , आर्थिक सलाहकार [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 31st August , 2010 S.O. 2364. In pursuance of Sub - Rule ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 ( as amended 1987 ) the Central Government hereby notifies following offices under the administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment , at least 80% Staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :-
S.No.
Name of the Office
1. Regional Office , EPFO , Bhubneshwar 2. Regional Office , EPFO , Gulbarga 3. Sub - Regional Office , EPFO , Durgapur 4. Sub-Regional Office , EPFO , Howrah 5. Sub- Regional Office , EPFO , Bommasandra 6. Sub-Regional Office , EPFO , Brahamapur 7. Divisional Training Institute , EPFO, Eastern Division , Kolkata
[No. E- 11017/1 /2006 - RBN]
K.M. GUPTA , Economic Advisor नई दिल्ली, 3 सितंबर , 2010
का.आ. 2365.- जबकि मैसर्स राष्ट्रीय जूट विनिर्माता निगम लिमिटेड इकाई संघ [ कोड संख्या डब्ल्यू बी/ 8 कोलकाता क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना, 1952 के पैरा 27 - कक के परिशिष्ट- क में निध ििरत छूट की शर्तों का उल्लंघन किया है और इससे कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - ध ारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार द्वारा दी गई छूट को रद्द करने के योग्य है ।
2. जबकि उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 की धारा 17 ( 1 ) ( क ) के तहत उक्त अधिनियम के अंतर्गत कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना के उपबंधों से छूट प्रदान करने संबंधी अधिसूचना एसआरओ संख्या 3416 दिनांक 26-10-1957 भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित की गयी थी ।
3. जबकि उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के न्यासी बोर्ड को उल्लंघनों के बारे में बताते हुए तथा अपना दृष्टिकोण स्पष्ट करने का अवसर प्रदान करते हुए दिनांक10-12-2009 को एक कारण बताओ नोटिस दिया गया था ।
6369
भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 18 , 2010/भाद्र 27 , 1932
4. और जबकि प्रतिष्ठान से प्राप्त उत्तर की कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि संगठन के परामर्श से जांच कर ली गई है और यह पाया गया है कि कारण बताओ नोटिस का उत्तर संतोषजनक नहीं है और यह कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 के पैरा 27- कक के परिशिष्ट- क में निरुपित छूट की शर्तों का स्पष्ट रूप से उल्लंघन करता है । 5. अतः , अब केन्द्र सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतदद्वारा उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को प्रदान की गई छूट को तत्काल प्रभाव से रद्द करती है ।
[सं. एस-35017/7/ 2009 - एसएस- II ]
एस.डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd September 2010 S.O. 2365.- Whereas M/ s National Jute Manufacturers Corporation Ltd. Unit Union [ under Code No. WB / 8 Kolkata region ] ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has violated the conditions of exemption stipulated in Appendix - A of Para 27AA of the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 and thereby deserves the cancellation of exemption granted by Government of India under clause I ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 ( 19 of 1952 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) .
2. Whereas a notification S.R.O. No. 3416 dated 26-10-1957 under Section 17 ( 1 ) ( a) of the said Act to the said establishment exempting it from the provisions of EPF Scheme under the EPF & MP Act , 1952 was published in the Gazette of India .
3. Whereas a Show Cause Notice dated 10-12-2009 narrating the violations and giving opportunity to clarify their stand was given to the Board of Trustees of the establishment .
4. And whereas the reply received from the establishment has been examined in consultation with the Employees ' Provident Fund Organization and it has been found that the reply to the show cause is not satisfactory and clearly violates the conditions of exemption delineated inAppendix - A of Para 27 AA of the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 .
5.Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4) of Section 17 of the said Act the Central Government hereby cancels the exemption granted to the said establishment with immediate effect .
[No.S - 35017 /7 /2009 - SS - II ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy .
Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .