This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007 /2003-05

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04 /0007/2003-05 भारतका राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 52]

No. 52]

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर 19 दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 , शनिवार/अग्रहायण 28 पौष 4, 1932 NEW DELHI , DECEMBER 19- DECEMBER 25 , 2010 , SATURDAY / AGRAHAYANA 28- PAUSA 4 , 1932 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप -खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence )

संचार मंत्रालय

(डाक विभाग )

कालिकट , 18 नवम्बर, 2010

का.आ. 3106.- केंद्रीय सरकार के विभागीय जाँच ( साक्षी उपस्थिति प्रवर्तन एवं दस्तावेजों का प्रस्तुतीकरण ) अधिनियम , 1972 ( 1972 के 18 ) के तहत खण्ड 4 की उपखण्ड ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों के प्रयोग से यह विनिर्दिष्ट किया जाता है कि श्री पी. के. शिवदासन , सहायक अधीक्षक डाकघर , तलिपरंबा उपमंडल , तलिपरंबा , श्रीपी.के. कुंचिकण्णन , ग्रामीण डाक सेवक शाखा पोस्ट्‌मास्टर, कुण्डुतोड के विरुद्ध विभागीय जाँच में उपर्युक्त अधिनियम के खण्ड 4 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के तहत भारत सरकार द्वारा दिये गये अधिकारों का प्रयोग करने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी हैं ।

[ संख्या आई एन वी/6-2/06-07 ]

एच. के. शर्मा, पोस्टमास्टर जनरल

(उत्तरी क्षेत्र) MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS (Department of Post)

Calicut , the 18th November , 2010

S.O. 3106. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 2) of Section 4 of the Departmental Inquires ( Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents ) Act , 1972 ( 18 of 1972 ) , the Central Government hereby specifies Shri P.K. Sivadasan , Assistant Superintendent of Posts , Taliparamba Sub-division, Taliparamba as an authority to exercise the power conferred on the Central Government by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the said Act in respect of Shri P.K. Kunhikannan , Gramin Dak 4734 G1/ 2010

(9007)

Sevak Branch Postmaster , Kunduthode against whom a departmental inquiry may be held.

[No. INV/6-2/06-07 ]

H. K. SHARMA , Postmaster General

(Northern Region ) (कृषिअनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 16 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3107.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , कृषि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियमावली 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में केंन्द्रीय भैंस अनुसंधान संस्थान , हिसार ( भा.कृ.अ. प. ) को जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है ।

[फा.सं. 13-10/2009- हिंदी/308 ]

विजय सिंह , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

(Department of Agricultural Research & Education ) New Delhi , the 16th December , 2010

S.O. 3107.- In pursuance of sub- Rule ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union ) Rules 1976, the Central Government , Ministry of Agriculture , Department ofAgricultural Research & Education hereby notifies the Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes , ( ICAR) Hisar , where more than 80% of staff have acuquired the working knowledge of Hindi .

[ F. No. 13-10/2009- Hindi / 308 ] VIJAY SINGH , Under Secy.

9008

[PART II SFC . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4. 1932

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 12 अक्तूबर , 2010

का.आ. 3108.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 176 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्राची इंटरप्राइजिज , जे 15 , एस ब्लाक , एमआईडीसी भोसारी , पुणे -411026 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " सीबी -30 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कैनन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 230 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाइप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 2.30 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

PrachiEnterprises

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

मशीन की बाडी के छेदों में से लिडिड वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है जार लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए गृह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी में जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा.तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 " , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 145) /2010 ]

बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विजान 9009 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 12th October , 2010

S.O. 3108.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of High accuracy ( Accuracy class -II ) of Series " CB - 30 " and with brand name " Cannon " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M / s Prachi Enterprises , J15 . S Block , MIDC Bhosari , Pune , -411026 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10 / 230 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is lg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2 Sealing arrangement

The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes on the body of the machine and lead seal is fixed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img.to 50mg. and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1x10k, 2x10k , or 5x10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F.No.WM - 21 / (145 )/2010 ]

B.N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9010

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 12 अक्तूबर, 2010

का.आ. 3109.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्राची इंटरप्राइजिज , जे 15 , एस ब्लाक , एमआईडीसी भोसारी , पुणे -411026 द्वारा विनिर्मित माध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " वीटी-30 "श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कैनन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 231 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकत क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति 2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्कंल की बाड़ी के छंदों में में सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनावद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी कंलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया जाता है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 2.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 " , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 145 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 / पांप 4, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 12th October , 2010

S.O. 3109.- Whether the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority . is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " VT- 30 " and with brand name " Cannon " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Prachi Enterprises , J15 , S Block , MIDC Bhosari , Pune - 411026 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10 / 231 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10k , or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 / ( 145)/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 9012

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 12 अक्तूबर , 2010

का.आ. 3110.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्राची इंटरप्राइजिज , जे 15 , एस ब्लाक , एमआईडीसी भोसारी , पुणे -411026 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सीपी-500 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कैनन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/ 232 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) हैं । इसकी अधिकत क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Prachi Enterprises

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल की बाडी के छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि..ग्रा. से अधिक और 5,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10* , 5x10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शुन्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 145) 2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

| - 9013 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi, the 12th October , 2010

S.O. 3110.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " CP - 500 " and with brand name " Cannon " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Prachi Enterprises , J15 , S Block , MIDC Bhosari , Pune - 411026 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 10 / 232 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg . and minimum capacity of 2Kg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1

Prachi Enterpriseta

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e'value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 / ( 145 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

9014

नई दिल्ली , 12 अक्तूबर , 2010

का.आ. 3111.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्राची इंटरप्राइजिज , जे 15 , एस ब्लाक , एमआईडीसी भोसारी , पुणे-411026 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III मध्यम वाले " सीपीएस -200 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कैनन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/ 233 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) हैं । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Cannon

Prachi Enterprises

max capacity : 200 kg

e : 100 g

min capacity : 2 kg

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल की बाडी के छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 200 किग्रा. तन्त्र की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 % , 2x10 के , 5x10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 145) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii)]

9015 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/ पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 12th October , 2010

S.O. 3111. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Person Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " CPS - 200 " and with brand name " Cannon " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s Prachi Enterprises , J15 , S Block , MIDC Bhosari , Pune- 411026 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 233 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Person WeighingMachine ) with a maximum capacity of 200 kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diplay ( LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1Model

Cannon

Prachi Enterprises

max capacity 200 kg

min capacity : 2 kg

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schermatic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board te disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 200kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 145 )/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 4734 Gl/10-2 [P : P 9016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 PAUSA 4, 1932

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3112, केंन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत गिर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चान् यह माम उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) नथा बाट १० (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अधि में यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न पर्गिस्थतियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का मैसर्स न्यू मेरिट बेइंग सिस्टम , नं. 80 , डॉ. अब्दुलकलाम स्ट्रीट, राघवेन्द्र नगर , इरंदमकट्टलै , कुंदराथुर, चेन्नै 600069 द्वाग यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग ( li ) वाले " एनएमटी -234" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित नोलन उपकरण । टेवलटाप का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गरिः " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिआई समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ;

मना उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी आ 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिम व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उ और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति--2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले वीर और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रायः नावद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी ककेलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए एडी कार्ड/ मदर मेंडिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह पाया करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी गाए जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण था होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की वाले हैं " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 *, 5x10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं । उससे

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 2.020101

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिः 9017 [ वल - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 22nd November , 2010

3112.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the et the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Stand irds of Weights and Measures Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to renerate service under varied conditions; A

How, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Captal Lovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing ius fable top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " NMT - 234 " and with branee " MERIT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , maunfactured by M / s New Merit Weighing System . No. 80, Dr. Abdulkalam Street , Raghavendra Nagar , Irandamkattalai , Kundrathur , Chennai - 600069 and which is assigned the approval 09/10/349 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with a faxum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

ling is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by se plate and top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical jagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

a instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A D card mother board access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereciares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similer malccuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the rang 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for e ale of g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 . 2x10 or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero Pramfactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with . won h , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F.No. WM - 21 ( 226 ) 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT . Director of Legal Metrology [ PART II St. 3 ( ii) ] 9018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4, 1932

नई दिल्ली , 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3113.- केंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति दखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयाग की अवधि में भो उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स न्यू मेरिट वेइंग सिस्टम , नं. 80. डा. अब्दुलकलाम स्ट्रीट , राघवेन्द्र नगर , इरंदमकट्टलै , कुंदराथुर, चेन्नै 600069 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता यथार्थता वर्ग III) वाले " एनएमटी 235 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेरिट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डो: 09/10/350 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार मेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उभदर्शित करना है । उपकरण 2.30 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति 2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिम्पले के बंग प्नंट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छंदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक पहवी यात्राबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए एडी कार्ड मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह भाषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिसम उक्त अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , 'यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10.000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. मे 5000 कि. ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं " ई " मान 1x10 % , 2x10 , 5x10 . के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शुन्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. मं. डब्ल्यू एम 2102266/2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 22nd November , 2010

S.O. 3113. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class --III ) of Series " NMP - 235 " and with brand name " MERIT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M / s New Merit Weighing System , No. 80 , Dr. Abdulkalam Street , Raghavendra Nagar, Irandamkattalai , Kundrathur , Chennai - 600069 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10 / 350 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200 g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure- 1

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' c ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 / ( 226 )/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 9020

[PART 11 SE 301 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3114.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान ही सेवा है .. उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और अप जानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग का अवधि में भी उक्त पादल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अनः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त भिनव की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आर.ए.एम. स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , नं. 26 , तीसरा क्रास , सर मिर्जा इस्माइल नगर , ( मिलाथ कालेज के पास ) , दावनगेरे -577001 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आरएसआई- डब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक बेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टच वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 10 / 36 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) हैं । इसकी अधिकत क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TOUCH

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले के राइट साइड / बैक साइड में सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्पले की बेस लगा टाप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है , तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करन के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जि उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैरो ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे अर 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तकः की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 *, 5x10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 34 ) /20101

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञा । 9021 [ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 22nd November , 2010

S.O. 3114.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbidge ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " RSI - WB " and with brand name " TOUCH WEIGH " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s R.A.M. Scale Industries , No.26 , 3rd cross , Sir Mirza Ismail Nagar ( Near Millath College ) , Davangere - 577001 Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10/ 36 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbidge ) with a maximum capacity of40 tonne and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure - 1 Model ( Weighbridge )

TOUCH

Figure- 3 Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

Sealing is done on the right side /back side of display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument , of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F.No.WM- 21 (34)/2010 ]

B.N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II Sto.3( i) ) THE GAZETTE OF RIDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4, 1932

9022

= = . =

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3115.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त से प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धाम 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विक्टोरियस इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , पाटनवा, रामनगर, चन्दौली डिस्ट्रीक्ट , उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग I! ) वाले " वीएचपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित सम्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " फास्ट्रेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 10/281 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति -2 उपकरण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

स्केल की बाडी के होल्स में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषण करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिसमे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -27 ( 182) 2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान

1 9023 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष 4, 1932

New Delhi , the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 3115. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy class -II ) of Series " VIP " and with brand name " FASTRACK" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured M/ s . Victorious Engineering Works , Industrial Area , Patanwa , Ramnagar, Chandauli - Distt . U.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10 /281 ;

The said Model is a strain gauage type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 200kg . and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 20 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure- 1

Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said, Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg , or more and with ' e' value of ix10 , 2x10 or 5x10 , k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ E. No.WM -21 / ( 182 )/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 4734 Gl/10-3 9024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DECEMBER 25 , 2010: PAUSA 4 , 1932

ॐ दित्सा, 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3116.-कन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णिन मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम. 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा कर (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग को अचान यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धार 36 को उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों ज विक्टोरियस इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, पाटनमा, अमनगर , चन्दौली डिस्ट्रीक्ट , उत्तर प्रदेश विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थ वाले " वीएचटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्तन मालन उपकरण ( टेवलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसको सद है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उवत मंडल कहा गया है उसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09, 10: 280 समनुदेशित कर प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेल प्रकार का भार पेल आधारित अल्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेवलटाप टाइप ) है । इधकार 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापभान अन्तराल ( ई ) ? ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति में व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उन्यालईडी प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत रदाय पर कार्य बजा है ।

आकृति उफहण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

म्केल की बाडी के होम में से योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । मिलकर मोलिग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के ३०८।१० बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकडी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की भाव 26 की उपभारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उमी उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपय । मि.ग्रा से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन) और 1000 अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 10.000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमापन अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक को उपधा वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , और 5x10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 !

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, वि 9025 [भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

New Dell the 22nd November , 2010

Whereas the Central Government , after onsidering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is entisi, a ghat the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of Sapdares Wewhts and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Modky Re 8 and the said Model is likely to maintun its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate sersee under varied conditions :

Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sechons ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing meruners ( Table Top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy class -IF ) of Series " VHT " and with brand FASTRACK" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Victorious Engineering Works , Industrial Area , Patanwa , Ramnagar, Chandauli - Distt. U.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10 /280 ;

Th Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - tomatic weighing instrument ( Table Top type ) with mum rapacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2 g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The estment operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure - 1

Figure - 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

don by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram 1. prosinon of the Model is given above.

Vascadahas also been provided in A /D candmother bound to disable access to external calibration .

11 : wesercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government heem Acres that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar wrsey and performance of sante series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in 100,000 for ' e' value of Img . to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to Hue of 100mg , or more and with' e' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole bouzaisto, manufactured by se same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the which the said ajeed Model has been manufactured.

F. No. WM - 21 / ( 182 )/ 2010 ]

B.N DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 25. 2010 PAUSA 4,1932

[ PART II S300

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3117.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह ग्भाधान हा गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 197601976 का 60 ) नथा बाट अप माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है ओर इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयंग की अवधि में भी उक्त मांडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अििनगम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मेसर्स पॉल सिस्टम, शांति कुंज, उदयपुरी चोपरा , पीरू माटग, तह. , रामनगर , जिला नैनीताल ( उत्तराखण्ड ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थना । यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीडब्ल्यूएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अम्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वंब्रिज टाइप ) के मडिन्न का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पॉल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिम अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09.10 473 ममनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार संल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वेव्रिज टाइप) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आर्धयनुन्नन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशन व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधंयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शिन करना है । उपकरण 2.30 बॉल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

PAL

आकृति 2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले के राइट साइड/बैक साइड में सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़ हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपराक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/भदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक को अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * और 5x10 , के हैं, जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -210284 ): 2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9027 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3117.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " PWS" and with brand name " PAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M / s Paul System , Shanit Kunj , Udaipuri Chopra , Peeru Madara , Tah . Ram Nagar , Distt.- Nainital ( U.K. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/10/473 ;

The said model is a strain gauage type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Type) with a maximum capacity of 50tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure - 1

PAL

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the right side /back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A D card mother broad to disable access to external calibration.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above Stonne and up to 200tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10 . 2x 10h or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has beer aanufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 284 ) 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT . Director of Legal Metrology 9028

PARI THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3118.- केंद्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह सभाकर उ उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का तथा वा ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उण्युक्त संवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की भारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा र्शाक्तयों का प्रयोग उमा मकैनिकल वर्क्स, 39 , के पी एन कालोनी , 5वीं स्ट्रीट, तिरूपुर -641601 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्त्रचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " उमा टैक " है इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 10 / 481 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधि 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-!

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिम्पल न. टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक रूपा डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए एडी कार्ड/ भर स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह धाः । कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इम प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी माध्यम उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण 1 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उगम " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता ' " ई" मान 1x10 %, 2x10*, 5x10 *, के हैं, जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 210

घी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक भाग ।। खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

9029 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3118.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed athorny,is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- authomatic weighing Distrument ( Fable Top Type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " UMT " and with rand name " UMA TECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , maunfactured by M/ s Uma Mechanical Works , 39 , PN. Colony. Sth Street , Tirupur - 641601 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 10/ 481 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure - 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother broad to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for e value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 /(292 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9030

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( i ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3119.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एल एन डी इंस्ट्यूमेंट्स , प्लाट सं. 198 , संतोषीमाता मंदिर के नजदीक , कमलानगर , कुशाईगुडा, ई सी आई एल पोस्ट , हैदराबाद -500062 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एलएनडीएमटीटी "श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एल एन डी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/10/372 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

डिम्पले के बॉडी से वायर डालकर डिस्प्ले पर सील किया जाता है । सील को बेस प्लेट और डिस्प्ले के टोप कवर से पूरी तरह जोड़ा गया है , उसके बाद सील वायर को सील से जोडे जो इन दो छेदों से निकालते हैं । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिमाता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मांडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होगें जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा.तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 2x10 * या 5x10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (238 )/ 2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9031 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010 पीथ 4. 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Dellm, the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3119. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act. 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules . 1987 and the model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with digital indication ofHigh accuracy (Accuracy class -II ) of series " LNDMTT ™ and with brand name " LND " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s LND Instruments . Plot No 198. Near Santhoshimatha Tempie , Kamalanagar, Kushaiguda , ECIL Post , Hyderabad - 500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/372;

The said mode ! is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument Table top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 300g . and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure -2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes atached with seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother broad to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 00 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50mg . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of5000 to 100,000 for e value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 , or 5x104 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 / (238 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 4734Gl /10-4 9032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PM

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3120.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह शाजनक है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 176 का 60 ) और बाद (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों मैसर्स एल एन डी इंस्ट्यूमेंट्स, प्लाट सं. 198 , संतोषीमाता मंदिर के नजदीक, कमलानगर , कुशाईगुडा , ई सी आई पोस्ट, हैदङ्गणः विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एलएडीटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालिन नोलन टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एल एन डी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और किय आई एन डी/09/ 10/373 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी को 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिभन प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

डिस्प्ले की बॉडी से वायर डालकर डिस्प्ले पर सील किया जाता है । सील को बेस प्लेट और डिस्प्ले के टोप कवर गया है , उसके बाद सील वायर को सील से जोड़ें जो इन दो छेदों से निकालते हैं । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए एडी कार्ड द्विप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

दिल और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह मंगणा करती । के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिसम मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकगण भी होगें 12 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उसस अधिका लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम श्गता वाले हेभान 1x10 *, 2x10 * या 5x10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. इब्ल्यू एम .

बी. एन. दीक्षित,निदेशक, 9033 [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

30. 3120. - Whether the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed balnothy is soisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the polisines of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to nder netorat service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Crawel Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - authomatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " LNDTT " and with brand name " ND " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M / s . LND Instruments , Plot No 198. Near Santhoshimatha Temple , Kamalanagar, Kushaiguda , ECIL Post , Hyderabad - 500062 and which is assigned the approval inr IND 09/10/373 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with азрыхітот страacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

cles

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by as plate & top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical :hagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Finstrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card mother board a disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act, the Central Government porby derlares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the sange of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for value of Sg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 , or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal 10701 manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 / ( 238 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology [ Poe Sec. 30ⅱ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DECEMBER 25 , 2010. PAUSA 4,1932

9034

नई दिल्ली 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3121. बेन्द्रीय सरकारका प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने को पश्चात वह सम्यान हा गया है कि उक्त रिपार्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति अखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और आर तथा पाप मानक ( मांडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुप और इयत की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में थी पक्त मांडल यथार्थना बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियां में उपवन सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अभिनित की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( २ ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयाग करते हुए मैसर्स एल एन डी इंस्ट्रूयूमेंट्स, प्लाट सं. 198 , सहायक मंदिर के नजदीक, कमलानगर , कुश्ाईगुडा, ई सी आई एल पोस्ट , हैदराबाद-500062 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वनं । वाले " एलएनडीपीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( रवलयप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एल एन डी " है ( जिये इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त गॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुभोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 10/374 अनुदेशित किया गया है . अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

अधिकतम उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गंज प्रकारभार मेल आधारित अश्वचालिक तोलन ( नेट ) हैं क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूगतम क्षमता 4 कि . है । इसका सत्यापन भापमान अन्तराल 200 है इसमे एक जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यानात्मक धारिलाई इमिटिंग डोतोलन परिसरात 11 बोलत और 4. न प्रत्यावली धारा विद्युतायत है ।

आकृति-।

डिस्प्ल की बॉडी से वायर हारकर डिएल पर सील किया जाता है । सील को बेस प्लंट और डिएल के टोप कार से परी नगर जोड़ा गया है , उसके बाद सील वायर को सील से जोडें जा इन दो छेदों से निकालते हैं । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंधकाका प्रमाणी गोलावद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए एडी कादराई में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिमिता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से . जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के पैसे की मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होगें वो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के नेत्र में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से 5000 कि.ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1110 , 2x10 * था 5x10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक था ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समान्य है ।

फिा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21( 238 ) /2010 ]

ची. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक विधिक माप विज्ञान भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/ पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3121. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " LNDPF " and wit !: brand name " LND " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfacturedby M / s . LND Instruments, Plot No. 198 , Near Santhoshimatha Temple , Kamalanagar , Kushaiguda , ECIL Post , Hyderabad - 500062 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /10/374;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . ihe instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-!

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A / D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg. with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 /(238 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9036

PH THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25, 2010 PAUSA 1 1932

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3122.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपार्ट पर विचार करन है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम 1976 मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न

गादकरता रहेगा।

कन्द्रीय सरक

उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (४ ) द्वारा शकियों का प्रयोग करन कंबर लेबोरेट्रिज एंड मेडिकल सप्लायर्स , बी 19. फंक्सनल इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , पटपड़गंज इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , दिल्ली -110092 द्वारा প্রिতিনিও साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सी एल एम एस "श्रृंखला के अस्त्रचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन भन मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केयरलैवमंड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिश्च आई डी/09/10/474 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्प्रिंग सिद्धांत पर आधारित मैकेनिकल अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन । है अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । कि.ग्रा. है ।

आकृति

आकृति -2 मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का डायग्राम

उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जाती है । कपटपूर्ण उपयोग को कर लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर लिया गया है और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह भाषणा करी किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के उतर्गत सी विनिर्मिता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री स, जि उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला दो पैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी हा जओ 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 150 किलोग्राम रु. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं " ई " मान 1x10 ", 2x10 , 5x10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 287)/2016

बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञा

ין" 9037 | भाग ॥ खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3122. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provistons of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act . 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - authomatic weighing Instrument ( Mechanical Person Weighing Machine ) of Ordinary accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " CLMS " and with brand name " CARELABMED " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M / s Care Laboratory's and Medical Supplies , B - 19 , Functional Industrial Estate , Patparganj Industrial Area , Delhi - 110092 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/474 ;

The said model is the principal of spring based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Mechnaical Person Weighing Machine) with a maximun capacity of 120kg . and minimum capacity of 10kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 1kg.

Figure- 1 Model

Lower Side of the Model

Figure - 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instruments . Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said . Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 150kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 1.000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10.or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F.No. WM - 21 (287 ) 2010 ]

B.N. DIXIT. I rector of Legal Metrology 9038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 PAUSA 4, 1932

[PART 1 SES . Sii) ]

नई दिल्न्नी 9 दिसम्बर, 2010

का.आ. 3123.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मारक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के बंभों को अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मांडल गथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में ताम करता रहेगा:

अतः अकाद्रीय सरकार उक्त आंभांनी भार ५० की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैगनं बोली इंवेशनल वंइंग , प्रकाश भवन, बैंक कालीन मोदीनगर, जिला गाजियाबाद -201204 उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " यूएसबी । " श्रृंधा को अंकन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वेब्रिज टाइप ) को मॉदल का. जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केली " है जिसे इसमें इसके पश्य उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी 09 10 307 सपन्देशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रग्गण पत्र जारी करनी है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गंज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम जपदर्शित वान्ता है 2.30 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजन्गवद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले के राइट साइड बैंक साइड में सीलिंग की वाली है । मीन डिस्पले के बेस प्लट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से गीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को गोलबंद कर वका का एक परुपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकगण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुँच को रोकने के लिए ही कामना दिय स्किन भी दिया गया है।

औरउन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करनी कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री गं, जिसमे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण जो 5 ग्रा. या ससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 में 200 24 तक अधिकतम श्मनस वाले है " ई " मान 1x10" , 2x10 ' , 5x10 " , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शुन्य के समतुल्य है ।

[ फा. मं. डब्ल्यू एम 21/(249 ) 2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9039 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 9th December, 2010

S.O. 3123. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series "USB 01 " and with brand name " KELI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/s . Keli International Weighing , Prakash Bhawan, Bank Colony, No. 4 , Modinagar Dist . Ghaziabad - 201 204 , U.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/407 ;

The said model is strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Type) with a miximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the right side/back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the disply. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 , or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 /( 249 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 4734Gl /10-5 9040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3124.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आर्बिट्रान इंटरप्राइज , ई-120 , इलैक्ट्रोनिक जोन , सेक्टर-26 , गांधी नगर , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग ill ) वाले " पीआरडब्ल्यूबी -5 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलैक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रोप्पट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 399 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलैक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड (एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

PROMPT

आकृति 2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

स्कंल की बाड़ी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर स्केल के राइट साइड लेफ्ट साइड में सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिम्पले के वेम प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुँच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्न मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्मिता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 % , 5x10% , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-2/( 245)/2010]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान ין

ין 9041 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौण् 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3124.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " PRWB - 5 " and with brand name " PROMPT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M / s . Orbitron Enterprise , E - 120 , Electronic Zone , Sector 26 , Gandhinagar , Gujurat and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 10 / 399;

The said model is strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Type) with a miximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the right side /back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by hole in base plate & top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A /D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10 % , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 / (245 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3125. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि अगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स आर्बिटन इंटरप्राइज , ई -120 , इलेक्ट्रोनिक जोन , सेक्टर -26 , गांधी नगर , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीआरसी -10 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रोम्पट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 400 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावृर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति- !

आकृति- 2 - मॉडल के इंडीकेटर का सीलिंग प्रावधान ।

स्केल की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्प्ले की राइट साइड लेफ्ट साइड में सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े दो छेदों में से सील वायर निकाली जाती है जो सील से जुडी है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए एडी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्मिता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 30 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21/ ( 245 )/2010 ]

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9043 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/ पौष 4, 1932

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3125. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane Type ) with digital indication of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " PRC - 10 " and with brand name " PROMPT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M / s . Orbitron Enterprise , E- 120 , Electronic Zone , Sector 26 , Gandhinagar , Gujurat and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 10 /400 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane Type ) with a miximum capacity of 10000kg and minimum capacity of 40kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure-2- Scaling arrangement .

Sealing is done on the right side / left side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by seal wire passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card mother board to disable access to external calibration.

The Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity range of 50kg and upto 30 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10h , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 /( 245 )/ 2010 /

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 9044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3126. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इस्कॉन इंडिया , 1245/17 , मेहता बिल्डिंग , रेलवे रोड, रोहतक ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ई आई टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इस्कान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/ 222 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

ESCON

आकृति-2 उपकरण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 143 )/2010]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9045 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 9th December , 2010

S.O. 3126. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy class -II ) of Series " EIT " and with brand name " ESCON " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M / s Escon India , 1245/17 , Mehta Building , Railway Road , Rohtak ( Haryana ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 10 / 222 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure- 2- Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has externa ! control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A / D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F.No.WM - 21 ( 143 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 9046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 PAUSA 4,1 32

[PART 11 - SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] ===

नई दिल्ली , 9 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3127.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इस्कॉन इंडिया , 1245/17 , मेहता बिल्डिग , रेलवे रोड , रोहतक ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वालं " ईआईपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इस्कान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/ 223 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति-2 उपकरण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

स्केल की बाडी के होल्स में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्मिता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होगें जो 5. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 143 )/2010]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9047 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष 4, 1932

[भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 9th December, 2010

S.O. 3127.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure give : below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and theindards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of series " EIP " and with brand name " ESCON " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/s . Escon India , 1245/17 , Mehta Building , Railway Road, Rohtak ( Haryana ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 223 ;

The said model is strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

ESCON

Figure- 2 - Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No.WM -21' ( 143 )/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Directo: of Legal Metrology 4734GI/10-6 9048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ==

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3128.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वेंकेटाचलम, 590 , वाइजल स्ट्रीट , कोयम्बतूर -641001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रिस्टिज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/414 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गैज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति- ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्मिता द्वारा उसी सिद्धान्त , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 254)/2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9049 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010

S.O. 3128. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - authomatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of series " TT " and with brand name " PRESTIGE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M / s . Venkatachalam , 590 , Vysial Street , Coimbatore-641001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 414;

The said Model is strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with a miximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1

Figure- 2- Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the Model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by hole in base plate top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A / D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 2 mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F.No.WM - 21 / (254 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3129.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वेंकेटाचलम , 590 , वाइजल स्ट्रीट , कोयम्बतूर -641001 द्वारा विनिर्मित माध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीएफ-" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्रिस्टिज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 415 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति 2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनयम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 * , 2x10* 5x10 , के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 254) /2010 ]

बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9051 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010

S.O. 3129.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- authomatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " PF " and with brand name " PRRESTIGE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M /s Venkatachalam , 590 , Vysial Street , Coimbatore- 641001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10 /415;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of ix10 , 2x10k , or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F.No. WM - 21 /( 254 )/2010 ]

B.N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3130.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टेलेंट इंडस्ट्रिज , प्लाट नं. 204 , चंडीसर जी आई डी सी एस्टेट , पालनपुर जिला बनासकांठा, गुजरात 385510 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टेलेंट- टीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टेलेंट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/84 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

30kg min- 100g.e- sg class

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्प्ले के राइट साइड/बैक साइड में सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्प्ले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है, तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 , के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 77 )/2010 ]

बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 9053 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 15th December , 2010

S.O. 3130. Whether the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- authomatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " TALENT- TT " and with brand name " TALENT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s Talent Industries , Plot No 204 , Chandisar G. I. D.C. Estate , Chandisar , Palanpur Dist Banaskantha Gujarat 385510 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/ 84;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

TALENT

max- 30kg min- 100g 6-5g. class-

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the right side /back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said , Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F.No.WM - 21 / ( 77 )/ 2010 ]

B.N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 9054

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4 , 1932

== ==

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3131.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टेलेंट इंडस्ट्रिज , प्लाट नं. 204 , चंडीसर जी आई डी सी एस्टेट , चंडीसर , पालनपुर जिला बनासकांठा , गुजरात 385510 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टेलेंट पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( पलेटफार्म टाइप ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टेलेंट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/85 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

max-1000kg. min-2kg. -100g class-III

TALENT

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्प्ले के राइट साइड / बैक साइड में सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्प्ले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है , तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसीश्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 के, के हैं, जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 77 ) /2010 ]

बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 9055 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25. 2010/पौष 4, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii))

New Delhi , the 15th December , 2010

S.O. 3131. Whether the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " TALENT- P " and with brand name " TALENT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s Talent Industries , Plot No. 204 , Chandisar G. I.D.C. Estate , Chandisar, Palanpur Dist Banaskantha Gujarat 385510 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/ 85 ;

The said model is a strain gauage type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure- 1

max-1000kg.

min-2kg. e-100g.

class -III

TALENT

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the mode!

Sealing is done on the right side back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two hoeles attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A D card mother board 10 disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said , Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F.No.WM - 21 ( 77 )/ 2010 ]

B.N. DIXIT. Director of Legal Metrology 4734GI /10-7 9056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4,1932

नई दिल्ली, 15 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3132. केन्द्रीय परकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपार्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चान् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें , वाट और माप मानक अधिनिग्म, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) नथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्न दिन्न यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करने हुए मैसर्स टेलेंट इंडस्ट्रिज , प्लाट नं. 204 , चंडीसर जी आई डी सी एस्टेट, चंडीसर, पालनपुर जिल्ला वनासकांठा , गुजरान 385510 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टेलेंट एफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक बंद्रित के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " टेसेंट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन ई 09 10:86 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेन आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिमका शन प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश त्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शिन करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

0000

-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी पर किए गए हैड होल स्क्रू में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्प्ले के बैंक साइड में सीलिंग की जाती है। डिम्प्ले की बैंक प्लेट के होल से सील को जोड़ा गया है । तब सील से जुड़े इन दोनों छेदों में से सील वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी में जिसमे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे की मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10% , 2x10% , 5x10 % , के हैं, जो बनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शुन्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21677 ) 2010 |

बी.एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक, विधिक मानिसान 9057 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4, 1932

| भाग 11 खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 15th December , 2010

S.O. 3132. Whereas the Central Ciovernment , arter considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) nd the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge ) with digital indication of medium ac curacy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " TALENT- F and with brand name " TALENT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Talent Industries , Plot No. 204 , Chandisar G. I.D.C Estate , Chandisar , Palanpur Dist: Banaskantha Gujarat - 38 :5510 which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10 / 86 :

The said model is a strain gauage type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained ' are effect . The LED display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure - 1 Model ( Weighbridge)

8000

Figure- 3 - Sealing provision of the indicator of the Model.

Sealing is done on the back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the head whole screw on the body of the display . The seal is connected by. whole in back plate of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the sard Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing it strument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for e value of 5g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 , or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactared by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ E.No.WM - 21 ( 77 ) 2010 )

B. N. DIXIT . Director of Legal Metrology THE GAZETTE OF FIRA DECEMBER 25, 2010 PAU SA 4, 1932

Parit s

कोयला मंत्रालय

दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3133 .--केन्द्रीय सरकारकाधारक क्षेत्र अर्जन और विकास अधिनियम, 1947 का 20 कि इसमें उसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) को धारा का.आ. 3440 तारीख 14 दिसम्बर 2000 द्वारा गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की जीवनचना संख्या भजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड गरी दिगम्बर 2009 में प्रकाशित की 2211.242 हेक्टेयर या 5468.92 एकड़ भम्यान को भीम में और उस पर के सभी সগি कारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशयको सूचना दी थी।

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दी है। और कंन्द्रीय सरकार का वक्त रिपोट करने के पश्चात् और धासगढ़ सरकारवर्ग हो गया है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथा अणित 2213.242 हेक्टर लगभग ) या 5468.92 एक । সামন মন জনी भाव में क अभी अधिकार अर्बन किए जाने चाहिए:

भगः, अब कंन्द्रीय सरकारको उपधारा ( दादां जाने में

कार्यालय में या गाय हँस्न कोलफील्ड २०१० अनुभाग । भीगत मंड , बिलासपुरे

जा सकता ? :

अनुसूची

गई पूर्व और राई पश्चिम ब्लाक

मांड रायगढ़ का लीड्स , रायगढ़ क्षेत्र , जिला रायगढ़ ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

(रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल बीसीजीएम (पीएलजी ) भूमि: 387 वीरः । दुर

सभी अधिकार ।

(क) राजस्व भूमि:

तहसील घरघोडा

जिला रायगढ

कम सं. ग्राम का नाभ

बन्दोबस्त संख्याक क्षेत्रहकर

i .

चरोद

100

483000

भाग पारदी

193

विजारी

ציר

52013

कुर्मीभावना

221

पारदा

192

דין 7

कठगपाली

कुल 1848.569 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 4567.81 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 9059 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

( ख ) राजस्व वन भूमि ( सीजेजे और बीजेजे ) :

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में टिप्पणियां

बन्दोबस्त संख्यांक

पटवारी हल्का

ग्राम का नाम

क्रम सं.

संख्यांक

भाग

199

223.046

1 .

बरौद

058.782

193

पोरडी

पूर्ण

भाग

06.000

221

कुर्मीभावना

भाग

62.325

192

पोरडा

भाग

11.390

काटाझग्यिा

03.130

भाग

कठगपाली

कुल: -- 364.673 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 901.11 एकड़ ( लगभग )

कुल योग ( कख ) : -2213.242 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

या 5468.92 एकड़ ( लगभग )

1. ग्राम बगैद ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या 11 ( भाग ) , 18 , 19 , 20 ( भाग ) , 1 से 364 , 365 ( भाग ) , 367 ( भाग ) , 369 ( भाग ) , 370 ( भाग ) , 372 से 573 , 575 से 721 , 722 ( भाग ) , 729 ( भाग ) , 745 ( भाग ) , 746,747 , 748 ( भाग ) , 750 ( भाग ) . 751,757 से 779 ।

2. ग्राम पोरडी ( संपूर्ण ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या -1 से 174

3. ग्राम विजारी ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या -2 , 7 ( भाग ) , 11 से 16. 77 से 105. 107 से 110 | 4. ग्राम कुर्मीभावना ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या 1 से 434 , 436 से 443. 445 से 485,487,489 से 532 1 5. ग्राम पोरडा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या -1 से 13 , 14 ( भाग ) , 15 ( भाग ) , 16 से 136 , 136/2 , ( 1 ) . 136/2, 137 से 233 , 233/2 , 234 से 255, 2561 भाग ) , 257 ( भाग ) , 258 से 269 , 278 , 304 से 313 , 315 से 317 , 318 ( भाग ) , 319 से 349, 349/1 से 349/4 , 350 से 353 , 353/1 , 354 , 357 , 357/1 से 357/3 , 358 से 418 ।

6. ग्राम काटाझरिया ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या 1,2 ( भाग ) , 16 , 17 , 19 से 39 , 47 से, 49. 5.4 ( भाग ) , 76 से 79 ।

1 , 21 , 42 से 58 , 86 ( भाग ) , 87 से 136 , 136/1 , 136/2 , 7. ग्राम कठरापाली ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या 137 से 240, 265 से 270 , 270/1 , से 270/9 , 271 से 280 , 284 , 285 , 293 से 313 , 315 से 364 1

सीमा वर्णन : --

क-ख रेखा ग्राम बरौद फगोरम के सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " क से आरंभ होती है और कुरकेट नदी के पूर्वी किनारे से होती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख- ग

रेखा ग्राम बरौद के प्लाट संख्या 70/1 , 11 : 4 , से 11/6 , 18 / 1 क, 20 / 1 क से होकर प्लाट संख्या 572,573 के पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई ग्राम बरौद के सीमा में बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।

रेखा ग्राम बरौद के प्लाट संख्या 573 , 575 के पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

घ ङ रेखा ग्राम बरौद के उत्तरी सीमा और ग्राम पोरडी के उत्तरी तथा पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ङ " पर मिलती है । ङ- च रेखा ग्राम कुर्मीभावना के प्लाट संख्या 419/2 , 420 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434, 436 , 437 के उत्तरी सीमा , 437 , 438 के पूर्वी सीमा , 440 , 441 के उत्तरी सीमा. 441. 443. 445 के पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " च " पर मिलती है । च-छ रेखा ग्राम कुर्मीभावना के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा से होकर प्लाट संख्या 449 , 450 , 456 , 472 के दक्षिणी सीमा , 485 , 487 , 489 , 490 . 493 के पूर्वी सीमा , 504 , 506 के उत्तरी सीमा, 511 के पश्चिमी सीमा से होकर ग्राम कुर्मीभावना के भागतः उत्तरी और पूर्वी सीमा में गुजरती हुई विन्दु " छ " पर मिलती है । 9060

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

PART II St 3 ( 1 ) छ-ज रेखा ग्राम काटाझरिया के भागतः पश्चिमी सीमा से होकर प्लाट संख्या 2/5 , 26 , 25/1 , 2421 के पूर्वी सीमा , 19. 165 , 1602 के उत्तरी सीमा, 16/2 , 16/1 , 16/5 , 39 , 48/1 , 47 , 48/1 , 48/2 , 49 , 54/3 के पूर्वी सीमा और 791, 79/4 वं. पृवा भाम्भ 76-2 के उत्तरी सीमा से होकर ग्राम काटाझरिया और पोरडा के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है । ज-अ एखा ग्राम कटरापाली के प्लाट संग 19 , 21 , 42 , के पूर्वी सीमा,42 , 48/1-48/4 , 58 के उत्तरी और पूर्वी सीमा , 56 , 55 के पूर्वी सीमा , 55 , 53 के दक्षिणी सीमा , 52 के पूर्वी सीमा तथा 86 से होकर 240 के दक्षिणी सीमा, 239 , 266 , 265 , 269 , 274 , 280 284, 285 , 293/2 के पूर्वी सीमा, 293/2 , 313 , 316 , 364 , 360 , 359 के दक्षिणी सीमा और 213 के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।

झञ रेखा ग्राम कठरापाली के भागतः दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ञ " पर मिलती है ।

अ-ट रेखा ग्राम पोरडा के प्लाट संख्या 397/1 , 399 , 400 , 418 , 414/1 , 415/2 , 413 , 412 , 411 , 404 , 318 के पश्चिमी सीमा, 313/2 , 304 , 245 , 248/2 , 248/1 , 269 , 267 , 264/1 , 263/3 के दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी सीमा , 263/1 , 278 , 257/9 , 257/7 के पश्चिमी मोमा, 257/7 , 257/10 के उत्तरी सीमा , 257/11 , 257/12 के पश्चिमी सीमा तथा 257/6 , 257/5 , 257/4 के दक्षिणी सीमा, 256/1 . 255 से होकर 40/1 के पश्चिमी सीमा, और 15 , 14 , से होती हुई बिन्दु " ट " पर मिलती है ।

रेखा ग्राम पोरडा- बिजारी के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा से होकर ग्राम बिजारी में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट संख्या 110/2 , 110/5, 109, 108 , 107 के दक्षिणी सीमा , 105 , 104 के पश्चिमी सीमा, 96 , 77 , 7/9 , 7/12 , 7/8 , 7/7 , 7/6 , 7/5 , 16/2 , 16/1 के दक्षिणी मीमा , 16/2 , 7/15 ,11 , 12/1 के पश्चिमी सीमा , विन्दु " ठ " से होकर ग्राम कुमर्माभावना विजारी के भागतः सम्मिलित भीमा से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 2 के पूर्वी, दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी सीमा तथा ग्राम पोरडा विजारी के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा में गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ड " पर मिलती है ।

रेखा ग्राम बरौद के प्लाट संख्या 750/1 के पश्चिमी सीमा , 751 के दक्षिणी सीमा , 750/2 के उत्तरी सीमा और 750/ 1,748 से हाकर 743/4 के दक्षिणी सीमा , 745/5 के पूर्वी तथा दक्षिणी सीमा तथा 722/1 , 412 , 387 , 385 , 386 से होकर गुजरती है फिर 382 के पश्चिमी सीमा , 372/1 , 372/2 के पूर्वी एवं 370, 369/1 , 367 , 365 , 729/3 , 352 , 346/1 , 346/3 , 346/4 , 34605 में होनी हुई ग्राम बरौद-फगोरम के ममिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ढ " पर मिलती है ।

दृक रेखा ग्राम बरौद फगोरम के भागतः सालित सीमा से गुजरती हई आरंभिन्न बिन्दु क" पर मिलती है ।

। फा. सं. 43015/ 10/2006-पी आर आई ।। एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 16th December , 2010

S.O. 3133. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.0 . 3446 dated the 14th December, 2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act . 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part - II . Section 3, sub - section ( ii ) dated the 19th December , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire 2213.242 hectares or 5-168.92 acres land as all rights in or over such lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;

And, whereas , the competent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act has made his report to the Central Governe.ent;

And, whereas , the Central Governmeat after considering the aforesaid report and after consulting the Governntent ofChhattishgarh, is satisfied that the lands measuring 2213.242 hectares ( approximately ) or 5468.92 acres ( approximately) as alt rights in or over such lands as described in schedule appended hereto ; should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 2213.242 hectares ( approximately ) or 5468.92 acres ( approximately ) as all rights in or over such lands as described in Schedule are hereby acquired .

The Plan bearing number SECLBSP - GM/ ( PL.G ) / Land/ 387 , dated the 12th July , 2010 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the Office of the Collector , Raigarh ( Chhattishgarh ) or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1. Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfield Limited ( Revenue Section ) Seepat Road. Bilaspur -1495006 ( Chhattisgarh ) 9061

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पांप 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Rai East and Rai West Block

Mand Raigarh Coalfields , Raigarh Area , Distt . Raigarh ( Chhattisgarh )

(Plan bearing number : SECL / BSP/GM ( PLG ) / Land: 387 dated the 12th July , 2010 )

All Rights:

(A) Revenue Land :

Tahsil - Gharghoda District Raigarh Sl . No. Name ofVillage

Remarks Area in Hectares

Settlement Number

Patwari halka

Number

3 2

16 1 .

Baroud

16 2

Pordi

26 3.

Bijari

27 4.

Kurmibhouna

27 5.

Porda

27 6.

Katajharia

27 7.

Katharrapali

483.962

Part

199

Part

193

120.995

Part

57.013

228

332.233

Part

221

563.180

Part

192

Part

048.622

Part

242.564

Total : 1848.569 hectares ( approximately ) or 4567.81 acres ( approximately )

(B) Revenue Forest Land ( CJJ & BJJ ) :

Sl . No. Name of Village

Remarks Area in Hectares

Settlement Number

Patwari halka

Number

3 1

16 Baroud

1 .

16 Pordi

27 3.

Kurmibhouna

27 4.

Porda

27 5.

Katajharia

27 6.

Katharrapali

Part

199

223.046

058.782

Part

193

06.000

Part

221

62.325

Part

192

11.390

Part

03.130

Part

Total : -364.673 Hectares ( approximately ) or 901.11 Acres ( approximately )

Grand Total (A + B ) : - 2213.242 hectares ( approximately)

or 5468.92 acres approximately )

1. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Baroud ( Part ) : - 11 ( P) , 18 , 19 , 20 ( P ) , 21 to 364 , 365 ( P ) , 367 ( P ) , 369 ( P ) , 370 ( P ) , 372 to 573.575 to 721 , 722 ( P ) 729 ( P ) , 745 ( P) , 746 , 747 , 748 ( P ) , 750 ( P ) , 751 , 757 to 779 .

2. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Pordi ( Full ) : - 1 to 174.

3. Plot Numbers to be acquired in . village Bijari (Part ) : - 2 , 7 (P ) , 11 to 16 , 77 to 105 , 107 to 110 .

4. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Kurmibhouna ( Part ) : - 1 to 434 , 436 to 443 , 445 to 485,487.489 to 532 .

5. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Porda ( Part ) : - 1 to 13 , 14 ( P ) , 15 ( P ) , 16 to 136 , 136/2 ( 1 ) , 136/2 . 137 to 233 , 233/2 , 234 to 255 , 256 ( P ) , 257 ( P ) , 258 to 269 , 278, 304 to 313 , 315 to 317, 318 ( P), 319 to 349 , 349/1 to 349/4 , 350 to 353,353/1,354,357 、 357/1 to 357/3 , 358 to 418 .

9062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 PAUSA 4. 1932

Pan SS (ii ) ] 6. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Katajharia ( Part ) : - 1 , 2 ( P ) , 16 , 17 , 19 to 39 , 47 to 19 , 54 ( 2 ) , 76109.

7. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Katharrapali (Part ) : - 1 to 21 , 42 to 58.80 ( P ) , 87 to 136 , 136 1. 1.30.2. 13740240. 265 to 270 , 270/1 to 270/9 . 271 to 280 , 284 , 285 , 293 to 313 , 315 to 364 .

Boundary Description :

A-B Line starts from point on the common bundary of villages Baroud - guram and passes along the castern bank of Kurket River and meets at point is

B-C i ine passes in village Baroud through plot number 70/1 , 1174 to 116 , 18 TK , 20K then western boundary ofplot puruber 572 , 573 and meets at point "C" on the village boundary of village Baroud .

(C ) Line passes in village Baroud along eastern boundary of plot number 573 , 575 and meets at point D DE Lime passes along northern village boundary of village Baroud , northern and eastern village boundary of village Pordi and meets at point .

Line passes in village Kurmibhouna along northern boundary of plot number 419 2 , 420 , 429,430,431, 182,433 , 434 , 436 , 437 , eastern boundary of plot number 437 , 438 , northern boundary of plot number 4-40, 441 , castern boundary of plot number 441 , 443 , 445 and meets at point " F " .

F-G Line passes along partly eastern village boundary of village Kurmibhona then southern bour - lny od plot number 449 , 450 , 456 , 472 , eastern boundary of plot number 485 , 487 , 489 , 490 , 193 , northern boundary of plot number 504 , 506 , western boundary of plot number 511 then along partly northern and eastern village boundary of village Kurmibhouna and meets at point " G" .

GH Line passes along partly western village boundary of village Katajharia then castern bomdary of plot ramber 2.5.26.25/1 , 24 , 21 , northern boundary of plot number 19. 16: 3 , 16 2. eastern boundary of plot number 16 2. 16 1 . 16 5,39,48/ 1,47,481 , 182 , 49 , 54 3. through and eastern boundary of plot number 79 1794, northern boundary of plot number 762 then along partly eastern village boundary of village Katajharia and Porda and meets atpoint H.

Line passes in village Katharrapali along eastern boundary of plot number 19. 21. 42 , northern and eastern boundary of plot number 42. 181-48 4 , 58 , eastern boundary of plot number 56 55 , southera boundary of plot number 55 , 53 , eastern boundary of plot number 52 , through 86 , southern boundary of plot number in , castern boundary of plot number 239.266 . 265.269.274,280,284,285,293 2 , southern boundary of plet number: 982 , 313 . 316,364,360,359 , partly eastern boundary of plot number 213 and meets at point I.

1-1

Line passes along partly southern and western village boundary of village Katharrapali and meets of pemt T. J-K Line passes in village Porda along western boundary of plot number 397 1.399 , 100 , 415, 111 1. Als 2.413 412,411,404.318 . southern and western boundary of plot number 313 2.304,245 , 248 2. 248 1. 269,767,264 1 . 263/3 , western boundary of plot number 263 1,278,257 4,257 7. northern boundary of plet mamber 25 , 157 10, western boundary of plot number 257 11,257 12 , southern boundary of plot number 257 6,25 " 5 , 25 256 1,255 , western boundary of plot number 40 1. through 15 , 14 , and meets at point K. 3. titeagh K- i - M Line passes along partly common boundary of villages Porda - Bijari then enter and pesses in village 15 : mar : thong southern boundary of plot number 1102 , 110/5 . 109 , 108 , 107 , western boundary of plot pumber 05 , 104 . southern boundary of plot number 96 , 77 , 79,7 12.7 8.7 7.7 6.7 5.16 2. 16 1. western boundary of plot sumber 16 2.7 / 15 . 11. 12 1 then point ' L' , along partly common boundary of villages Kurmibhotma Bijari after that eastern , southern and western boundary of plot number 2 then partly common boundary of'villages Kurushouna- Bijari and meets at point M.

M-N I ine passes in village Baroud along western boundary of plot number 750 1. southern boundary of plot number 75% , northern boundary of plot number 750-2 , through 750 1. 748 , southern boundary of plot number 745 4 . eastern and southern boundary of plot number 745 ' 3 , through 722 1.412,387,385,386 , western boundary of piot number 382 , eastern boundary of plot number 372 1.372 2 , through 370,369 1.36.365.729 3,352,346 1.346 3 . 346 4,346 5 and meets at point ' N ' on the common boundary of village Baroud- Faguram

NA Line passes along the partly common boundary of villages Baroud- Faguram and meets at starting pont N.

F No.43015 10 20606 - PRIM - 1 |

M. SHAHABUDEEN . Under Secy .

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9063

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 / पौष 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3134.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन एवं विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 97 तारीख 4-01-2010 द्वारा जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग -11 , खण्ड -3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 9 जनवरी , 2010 को प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 229.20 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 566.12 एकड़ ( लगभग ) (" सभी अधिकार " 210.20 हेक्टर एवं " खनन अधिकार " 19.00 हेक्टर ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन एवं विकास ) , अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथा वर्णित 229.20 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 566.12 एकड़ ( लगभग ) ( " सभी अधिकार " 210.20 हेक्टर एवं " खनन अधिकार " 19.00 हेक्टर ) जो उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने की अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले रेखांक संख्या जीएम /जेएनआर/ भूमि/सीबीए/ 10 / 01 तारीख 24 जून, 2010 कलेक्टर , बर्दवान (पश्चिम बंगाल ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, । काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी ( परियोजना और योजना ) , ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , संकतोडिया , डाकघर दिशेरगढ़ , जिला बर्द्धवान -713333 ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) के कार्यालय में किया जाता है ।

टिप्पण 2 : उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं : - अर्जन की बाबत आपत्तियाँ : --

" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गयी है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन के किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा । स्पष्टीकरण: -

(1) इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपति नहीं मानी जायेगी , कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयले उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

(2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जायेगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपतियों को सुनने के पश्चात और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जाँच यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

(3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जायेगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता , यदि भूमि में या किसी ऐसी में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं । " टिप्पणी 3 : केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2520 तारीख 11 जून , 1983 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची

झांझरा-कालिपुर भू- विज्ञानी ब्लॉक

जिला बर्द्धवान ( पश्चिम बंगाल )

(रेखांक संख्या : जीएम/जेएनआर/ भूमि/सीबीए/ 10/01 तारीख 24 जून , 2010 )

सभी अधिकार :

मौजा (ग्राम )

क्र. सं.

जे.एल. संख्या 1. सिरसा

17- 2.

16 बालीजुरी

24 मधाईगंज

बेनेबंदी

11 5.

9 श्रीकृष्णपुर

4734GI/10-8

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

जिला

टिप्पणियां पुलिसस्टेशन (थाना)

बर्दवान

48.00

भाग

फरीदपुर

69.00

भाग

बर्दवान

फरीदपुर

बर्दवान

39.80

भाग

फरीदपुर

भाग

29.60

बर्दवान

फरीदपुर

बर्दवान

230.80

भाग

फरीदपुर

210.20 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) कुल:

9064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

== खनन अधिकार :

1 .

बर्दवान

19.00

भाग बालीजुरी

फरीदपुर

19.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

कुल:

झांझरा क्षेत्र के निरंतर दूसरे खनिक के लिए विस्तारित भूमि की अनुसूची

जे.एल. संख्या-16

मौजा--बालीजुरी

थाना--फरीदपुर (सभी अधिकार )

आर.एस. प्लाट संख्या : -

5 (भाग ) , 33( भाग ) , 46( भाग ) , 47, 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71 . 72,73,74,75,76 , 77 , 78,79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ( भाग ) , 105 ( भाग ) , 106 , 107 ( भाग) , 108 ( भाग) , 109, 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114, 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 ( भाग ) , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 141 ( भाग ) , 145 ( भाग ) , 171 ( भाग) , 172, 173 ( भाग ) , 174( भाग ) , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184.185.186.187.188 . 189( भाग) , 190 ( भाग) , 191 , 192 , 196( भाग ) , 225 ( भाग ) , 226 , 227 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240 . 241,242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 324 ( भाग) , 327 , 328 ( भाग ) , 331 ( भाग ) , 332, 333 , 334 , 335 ( भाग) , 419 , 420, 421 ( भाग) ,423 , 424 (भाग ) , 425,426, 428, 429, 430 , 431 , 432.433,434,435,436,437 , 439( भाग) , 440 ( भाग ) , 542 ( भाग ) , 587 , 588 , 589 , 1247 , 1248 , 1256 , 1257 , 1261 , 1262 , 1263 , 1264 , 1265 , 1266 , 1267 . 1268 , 1269 , 1270,1271,1272,1273,1274,1275,1276,1277,1278 , 1279 , 1280 , 1281 , 1282 , 1283 , 1284 , 1285,1286 . 1287 , 1288 , 1289 , 1290 , 1291 , 1292 , 1293 , 1294、1295 , 1296 , 1297 , 1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 ( भाग ) , 1307 1308 . 1363 (भाग ) , 1365 , 1366 , 1369 , 1370 , 1371 , 1373,1374, 1375 ( भाग) , 1447( भाग) , 1465 ( भाग) , 1466, 1467.1468,1469 , 1470( भाग) , 1476 ( भाग) , 1477 ( भाग) , 1478 , 1479, 1480 , 1481 , 1482 , 1483 , 1484 , 1485 , 1486 , 1487 , 1488 , 1489 , 1490 , 1491 , 1492, 1493 , 1494 , 1495 , 1496, 1497 , 1498 , 1499 , 1500 , 1504 ( भाग ) , 1508( भाग ) , 1509( भाग) , 1510 , 1511 , 1512 . 1513 , 1514 , 1515 , 1516 , 1517 1518 , 1519 , 1520 , 1521 , 1522 , 1523 , 1524 , 1525 ( भाग ) , 1527 , 1528. 1529 , 1530 , 1531 , 1532 , 1533 , 1534 , 1535 , 1544 , 1545 , 1546 , 1547 , 1548 , 1549 ( भाग ) , 1550 1551 ( भाग ) , 1552 ( भाग) , 56/2067 , 113/2068 , 101/2070 , 140/ 2080,248/2084 , 1248/2103 , 1467/2104 , 1524/2106 , 233/2116, 174/2128 ( भाग) , 174/21291

मौजा--बालीजुरी ( बालीजुरी ग्राम के अधीन ) जे.एल. संख्या 16 , थाना- फरीदपुर ,

आर.एस. प्लाट संख्या: - (खनन अधिकार )

135 ( भाग) , 141 ( भाग) , 142, 143 , 144, 145 ( भाग ), 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 ( भाग) , 173 ( भाग ) , 174( भाग ) , 189 ( भाग ) , 190( भाग ) , 193 , 194 、 195, 196( भाग ) , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215.216 , 217,218,219,220 , 221 , 222 , 223, 224, 225 ( भाग) , 228 , 232,421 ( भाग) , 424 ( भाग) , 438,439 ( भाग) , 440, 441 , 442 , 443 , 444, 445 , 446 , 447, 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464,465,466 , 467 , 468 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477,478,479,480 , 481,482,483,484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488 , 489 , 490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507 , 508,509,510,511 , 512 , 513,514,515,516 , 517 , 518,519,520,521,525 ( भाग ) , 533,535,536,537,538,539,540,541,542 ( भाग ) , 543 , 544, 545,546,547,548,550,566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,576 ( भाग ) , 577,578,579,580,581,582,583 , 584,585 , 586 , 594 ( भाग ) , 595 ( भाग ) , 567/2073 , 206/2081 , 160/2082 , 210/2083 , 424/2087 , 424/2088 , 501/2089 . 205/2112 , 168/2113 , 168/2114 , 151/2115 , 574/2121 , 578/2122( भाग) , 174/2128 ( भाग ) , 1446 ( भाग), 1447 ( भाग) . 1470 ( भाग ) , 1471 , 1472 , 1473 , 1474 , 1475 , 1476( भाग ) , 1477 ( भाग ) ।

मौजा--सिरसा जे.एल. संख्या 17 थाना- फरीदपुर ,

आर. एस. प्लाट संख्या: - (सभी अधिकार )

843 ( भाग) , 1169( भाग ) , 1676( भाग) , 1677 ( भाग) , 1678 , 1679 , 1680 , 1681 , 1682 , 1683 , 1684 , 1685 , 1686 , 1687 , 1688 , 1689 , 1690 , 1691 , 1692,1693 , 1694,1695 , 1698 , 1699 , 1700 , 1701 , 1702 , 1703 , 1704 , 1705 1706 ( भाग ) 1707, 1708,1709 , 1710 , 1743 , 1755 , 1756 , 1757 , 1758 , 1759 , 1761 ( भाग) , 1762, 1763 , 1764 , 1765 , 1766、1767、1768 . 1769 , 1770 , 1771 , 1772、1773,1774 , 1775、1776 , 1777 , 1778 , 1779 , 1780 , 1781 , 1782 , 1783 , 1784 , 1785,1786 , 1787,1788,1789 , 1790,1791 , 1792,1793 , 1794 , 1795 , 1796 , 1797 , 1798 , 1799 , 1800 , 1801 , 1802 , 1803,1804 , 9065 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1805 , 1806 , 1807 , 1808 , 1809 , 1810 , 1811 , 1812 , 1813 , 1814 , 1815 , 1816 , 1817, 1818 , 1819 , 1821 , 1822 , 1823 , 1824 , 1825 , 1826 , 1827 , 1828 , 1829 , 1830 , 1831 , 1832 , 1833 , 1834 , 1835 , 1836 , 1837 , 1838 , 1839 , 1840 , 1841 , 1842 , 1843 , 1844 , 1845 , 1846 , 1847 , 1848 , 1849 , 1850 , 1851,1852 , 1853 , 1854 , 1855,1858 , 1859 , 1944 , 1945( भाग) , 1946 , 1961 , 1962 , 1963 , 1964 , 1965 , 1966 , 1967 , 1968 ( भाग) , 1969 , 1970 , 1971 , 1972 , 1973 , 1974 , 1975 , 1976, 1977 , 1978 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , 1983 , 1984 , 1985 , 1986 , 1987 , 1988 , 1989 , 1990 , 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995 , 1996 , 1997 , 1998 , 1999 , 2000 , 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2004 , 2005 , 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017, 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , 2024 , 2025 , 2026 , 2027 , 2028 , 2029, 2030 , 2031 , 2032, 2033 , 2034 , 2035 , 2036 , 2037 , 2038 , 2039 , 2040 , 2041 , 2042 , 2043 , 2058 ( भाग ) , 1684/2343 , 1968/2344 , 1793/2378 , 1737/23841

मौजा-- मधाईगंज जे.एल. संख्या-24 थाना-फरीदपुर

आर. एस. प्लाट संख्या: - (सभी अधिकार )

34(भाग ), 35 , 36, 37, 38 , 39 ( भाग ) , 155, 156 , 157, 158 ( भाग ) , 311 ( भाग ) , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315, 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 ( भाग) , 320, 321 ( भाग ) , 322 , 323 , 324 ( भाग ) , 325 ( भाग ) , 326 ( भाग ) , 331 ( भाग ) ।

मौजा-- बेनेबंदी जे.एल. संख्या -11 थाना--फरीदपुर

आर. एस. प्लाट संख्या : - (सभी अधिकार )

143 ( भाग ) , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 ( भाग ) , 181 , 182 , 183 ( भाग ) , 215 1 मौजा-- श्रीकृष्णपुर जे.एल. संख्या-१ थाना--फरीदपुर

आर. एस. प्लाट संख्या: - (सभी अधिकार )

1811 ( भाग ) ,

रेखा सीमा विवरण :

12-3-4 : रेखा, मौजा सिरसा जे.एल. सं. 17 के प्लाट सं. 843 के पूर्वी भाग के बिंदु । ( प्रस्तावित क्षेत्र का आरंभिक बिन्दु ) से शुरू होकर प्लाट सं. 1168 के दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 2 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 2 प्लाट सं. 1168 के दक्षिणी पूर्व छोर के बिंदु 2 से शुरू होती है और प्लाट संख्या 1169 के मध्य , 2058 के उत्तरी भाग से , प्लाट संख्या 1944 के उत्तरी रेखा से प्लाट संख्या 1945 के मध्य से , प्लाट संख्या 1946 के उत्तरी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 3 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 3 से शुरू होकर प्लाट सं. 1961 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 2377 के पूर्वी भाग से , प्लाट संख्या 1855 , 1858 1859 के उत्तरी रेखा से, प्लाट संख्या 1676 , 1677 के दक्षिणी भाग से , प्लाट संख्या 1679 , 1680 , 1691 , 1692 , 1693 , 1695 , 1698 , 1699 , 1710 , 1707 , 1705 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1706 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 1755 , 1759 के उत्तरी रेखा से प्लाट संख्या 1761 के मध्य से , संख्या 1762 के उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 1743 के उत्तरी रेखा से , प्लाट संख्या 1763 के उत्तरी पूर्व रेखा से प्लाट संख्या 2384 के उत्तरी रेखा सभी प्लाट संख्या जे.एल. सं. 17 से गुजरती हुई सम्मिलित सीमा मौजा सिरसा जे.एल. सं. 17 और मौजा बालीजुरी संख्या 16 में 4 बिंदु पर मिलती है जिसे याजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

रेखा , मांजा सिरसा जे.एल. सं. 17 तथा मौजा बालीजुरी जे.एल. सं. 16 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 4 से शुरू होकर मौजा बालीजुरी जे. एल. संख्या 16 के के प्लाट सं. 108 के उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट सं. 107 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 5 के दक्षिणी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 105 के उत्तरी भाग प्लाट सं. 103,101 , 2070 के उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 33 , 46 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 47 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 49 , 50 के पूर्वी रखा , प्लाट संख्या 54 के उत्तरी रेखा प्लाट संख्या 589 के उत्तरी पूर्वी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 594 , 595 के मध्य, प्लाट संख्या 582 के पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 578 के दक्षिणी भाग प्लाट संख्या 577 के उत्तरी भाग भाग प्लाट संख्या 579 , 574, 573 के पूर्वी रेखा प्लाट संख्या 566 के उत्तरी रेखा प्लाट संख्या 551 , 549 के मध्य प्लाट संख्या 533 , 535 , 521 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1446 के मध्य, प्लाट संख्या 1470 के उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 1447 के उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 1467, 1466 के उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट 1465 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 1371 , 1369 , 1366 , 1365 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1363 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 1515 , 1516 , 1518 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1308 के पश्चिमी और उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 130 ? के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1.301 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 1247 के उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट संख्या 1248 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 1265 के पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट संख्या 1256 के उत्तरी रेखा से गुजरती हुई सभी प्लाट मौजा बालीजुरी , जे. एल. सं. 16 के अन्तर्गत है जो मौजा बालीज़ी संख्या 16 तथा मौजा चेनाबंदी , जे.एल. संख्या ।। के सम्मिलित बिंदु 5 पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

5-5क

रेखा , मांजा बालीजुरी जे.एल. संख्या 16 तथा मौजा बेनाबंदी , जे.एल. संख्या ।। के सम्मिलित बिंदु 5 से शुरू होकर मौजा वालीजुरी संख्या 16 के प्लांट संख्या 1257 , 1261 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई मौजा बालीजुरी जे.एल. संख्या 16 के बिंदु 5 क पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है । 9066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

[ PARI II - SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 5क-6

यह रेखा मौजा- बालीजुरी, जे.एल. संख्या 16 के प्लाट सं. 1261 के दक्षिण पूर्व छोर के बिंदु ऽक से शुरू होती है और प्लाट संख्या 1260 के उत्तरी रेखा से गुजरती है और मौजा बालीजुरी संख्या 16 तथा मौजा बनाबंदी , जे.एल. संख्या 11 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 6 पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

6-7 रेखा , मौजा- बालीजुरी , जे. एल. संख्या 16 तथा मौजा- बेनाबंदी , जे.एल. संख्या ।। के सम्मिलित बिंदु 6 से शुरू होकर मौजा- बेनाबंदी, जे.एल. संख्या 11 के प्लाट संख्या 171 , 170 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 177.178 के पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट संख्या 180 के पश्चिमी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 183 के उत्तरी भाग से गुजरती हुई मौजा- बेनाबंदी, जे.एल. संख्या 11 के बिंदु 7 पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

7-8 देखा , मौजा बेनाबंदी , जे. एल. संख्या 11 के बिंदु 7 से शुरू होती है मौजा बेनाबंदी, जे.एल. संख्या ।। के प्लाट संख्या 183 से उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 143 के दक्षिण पश्चिम छोर के भाग से गुजरती हुई मौजा बेनाबंदी , जे.एल. नं. 11 तथा श्रीकृष्णपुर , जे.एल. संख्या 9 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 8 ( मौजा- बेनाबंदी , जे.एल. सं. 11 और श्रीकृष्णपुर जे.एल. सं. 9 ) पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

8-9 रेखा , मौजा- बेनाबंदी , जे.एल. संख्या ।। तथा मौजा श्रीकृष्णपुर, जे.एल. संख्या 9 के बिंदु 8 से शुरू होकर मौजा- श्रीकृष्णपुर , जे.एल. संख्या 9 के खसरा संख्या 1811 के मध्य उत्तरी से गुजरती हुई मौजा- श्रीकृष्णपुर, जे.एल. संख्या 9 के प्लाट संख्या 1811 के बिंदु 9 पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है । 9-10

रेखा , मौजा- श्रीकृष्णपुर , जे.एल. संख्या 9 के बिंदु 9 से शुरू होकर मौजा- श्रीकृष्णपुर , जे.एल. संख्या 9 के प्लाट संख्या 1811 के मध्य पूर्व से गुजरती हुई मौजा- श्रीकृष्णपुर , जे.एल. संख्या 9 तथा मौजा मधाईगंज जे.एल. संख्या 24 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 10 पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

10-11

रेखा, मौजा- श्रीकृष्णपुर , जे.एल. संख्या 9 , मौजा- मधाईगंज जे.एल. सं. 24 के प्लाट संख्या 331 के सम्मिलत बिंदु 10 से शुरू होती है और प्लाट संख्या 319 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 320 के पूर्व , प्लाट संख्या 321 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 326 के पश्चिमी , प्लाट संख्या 325 के पश्चिमी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 324 के पूर्वी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 311 के मध्य, प्लाट संख्या 158 के दक्षिणी पश्चिम से गुजरती हुई मौजा , मधाईगंज जे.एल. सं. 24 के प्लाट संख्या 159 के दक्षिण पूर्व बिंदु ।। पर मिलती है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

11-12-13-14-15-16-17 रेखा , मौजा मधाईगंज जे.एल. सं. 24 के बिंदु 11 से शुरू होती है और मौजा- मधाईगंज जे. एल. सं. 24 के प्लाट संख्या 159 के उत्तरी पूर्व से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 12 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 12 से शुरू होती है और प्लाट संख्या 158 के पश्चिमी भाग से गुजरती हुई , प्लाट संख्या 37 के दक्षिण पूर्व बिंदु 13 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 13 के प्लाट संख्या 37 के दक्षिणी रेखा से शुरू होकर 14 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 14 से शुरू होकर, प्लाट संख्या 38 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 38 के पूर्वी रेखा 15 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 15 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 38 के दक्षिण रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 16 पर मिलती है । यह रेखा बिंदु 16 प्लाट संख्या 38 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 38 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 39 के मध्य पूर्व , प्लाट संख्या 34 के मध्य से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 17 पर मिलती है, सभी बिंदु मौजा- मधाईगंज जे.एल. सं. 24 से गुजरती है ( मौजा- मधाईगंज जे.एल. सं. 24 के प्लाट संख्या 31 के दक्षिणी पूर्व बिंदु तथा मौजा मधाईगंज जे.एल. सं. 24 एवं मौजा- बेनाबंदी जे.एल. नं. ।। के सम्मिलत बिंदु ) जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

17-18

रेखा , मौजा- मधाईगंज जे . एल. सं. 24 तथा मौजा- बेनाबंदी जे . एल. सं. 11 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 17 से शुरू होती है और मौजा- बेनेबंदी जे.एल. नं. 11 के प्लाट संख्या 183 के पश्चिमी भाग से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 18 पर मिलती है (मौजा- बेनाबंदी के प्लाट संख्या 182 के उत्तर पश्चिम छोर तथा मौजा- बेनाबंदी जे.एल. सं. 11 एवं मौजा- बालीजुरी जे.एल. सं. 16 के सम्मिलत बिंदु ) जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

18-19-20-21-22-23 रेखा, मौजा- बेनाबंदी जे.एल. सं. ।। तथा बालीजुरी जे. एल . सं. 16 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 18 से शुरू होती है और प्लाट संख्या 1552 , 1551 के मध्य , प्लाट संख्या 1553 के उत्तर- पूर्व भाग , प्लाट संख्या 1548 , 1547 , 1544 , 1535 , 1527 , 2106 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1524 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 19 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 19 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 1524 के पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1525 के मध्य पूर्वी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 1508 , 1509 , 1504 के मध्य, प्लाट संख्या 1500 , 1498 , 428 , 426 , 423 , 419 , 420 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 336 के उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट संख्या 335 के दक्षिणी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 324 के उत्तरी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 326 के उत्तरी रेखा 328 के मध्य 331 के दक्षिणी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 2116 के दक्षिणी रेखा तक , प्लाट संख्या 256 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 20 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 20 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 2116 , 233 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 236 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 256 के पूर्वी बिंदु से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 21 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 21 से शुरू

ין 9067 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

= होकर प्लाट संख्या 250 , 251 के दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट संख्या 252 , 255 के पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 254 के दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 22 पर मिलती है , सभी बिंदु मौजा- बालीजुरी जे.एल. सं. 16 के अन्तर्गत है । ( मौजा- बालीजुरी और सिरसा के सम्मिलत सीमा रेखा ) । रेखा , बिंदु 22 से शुरू होती है और मौजा सिरसा के प्लाट संख्या 2041 , 2042 , 2043 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 23 पर मिलती है ( मौजा वालीजुरी जे.एल. सं. 16 तथा मौजा - सिरसा जे.एल. सं. 17 के सम्मिलित बिंदु ) जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

23-24-25-26-27-1 रेखा , मौजा- बालीजुरी जे.एल. सं. 16 तथा मौजा- सिरसा जे.एल. सं. 17 के सम्मिलित बिंदु 23 से शुरू होती है और प्लाट संख्या 2040 , 2039 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट संख्या 1968 के पश्चिमी भाग , प्लाट संख्या 2344 के दक्षिणी रेखा से प्लाट संख्या 1946 के पूर्वी रेखा के मध्य बिंदु तक , गुजरती हुई बिंदु 24 पर मिलती है । रेखा, बिंदु 24 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 1946 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 25 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 25 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 1946 , 1945 , 1944 के दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 26 पर मिलती है । रेखा, बिंदु 26 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 2058 के उत्तरी भाग से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 27 पर मिलती है । रेखा , बिंदु 27 से शुरू होकर प्लाट संख्या 728 के उत्तरी रेखा से गुजरती हुई मौजा - सिरसा जे. एल. सं. 17 के बिंदु 1 पर मिलती है ( प्रस्तावित क्षेत्र का प्रारंभिक बिंदु ) जिसके सभी बिंदु मौजा सिरसा जे.एल. सं. 17 के अन्तर्गत है जिसे योजना में निरूपित किया गया है ।

[फा. सं. 43015 /28 /2009- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th December , 2010

S. O. 3134. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 97 dated the 4th January , 2010 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , in Part 11 , Section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated the 9th January , 2010 , the Central Governinent gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 229.20 hectares or 566.12 acres ( approximately ) (210.20 hectares for all rights ' and 19.00 hectares for ' mining rights ' ) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification :

And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that Coal is obtainable in a part of the said land prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 229.20 hectares ( approximately ) or 566.12 acres ( approximately ) for ( ' all rights in 210.20 hectares and ' mining rights ' in 19.00 hectares ) as described in the schedule appended , hereto .

Note 1 : The plan bearing number GM / JNR / LAND / CBA/ 10 / 01 dated the 24th June , 2010 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Collector, Burdwan ( West Bengal ) , or in the Office the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700 001 , or in the Office of the Director Technical ( Project and Planning ) , Eastern Coalfields Limited , Sanctoria , Post Office - Dishergarh , Dist . - Burdwan -713 333 ( West Bengal) .

Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows : - Objection to acquisition :

"8 ( 1 ) Any persons interested in respect of which a notification under Section 7 has been issued , may , within thirty day's of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land .

Explanation -

(1 ) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section of any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land or the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing . and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry , if any , as he thinks necessary , either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different report of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government . containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of the proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government.

(3 ) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act. " Note 3 : The Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700 001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under Section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 2520 , dated the 11th June , 1983 .

9068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

JHANJRA - KALIPUR GEOLOGICAL BLOCK,

DISTRICT BURDWAN (WEST BENGAL)

(Plan bearing number : GM / JNR / LAND / CBA / 10/ 01 , dated the 24th June , 2010 ) All Rights :

District

Remarks J.L. number

Area in hectares

Sl . No.

Police Station

(Thana)

Mouza (Village)

48.00

Sirsha

Burdwan

part

Faridpur

69.00

Burdwan

Balijuri

part

Faridpur

Burdwan

39.80

Faridpur

part Madhaigani

29.60

Benebandi

Burdwan

Faridpur

part 9

Burdwan

23.80

Srikrishnapur

part

Faridpur

Total : 210.20 ( approximately Mining Rights :

1 .

Burdwan

19.00

Balijuri

Faridpur

part

Total : 19.00 ( approximately) Land Schedule for extended area for 2nd Continuous Miner at Jhanjra Area

J. L. Number. - 16

Mouza -Balijuri

P.S. - Faridpur

R. S. Plot numbers :-( All Rights )

5 ( P ) , 33 ( P) , 46 ( P) , 47 , 49 , 50 ,50,51 ,51 , 52 ,52 , 53 ,53 , 54 ,54 , 55 ,55 , 56 ,56 , 57 ,57 , 58 ,58 , 59 ,59 , 660 , 61 , 62 , 63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ( P ) , 105 ( P ) , 106 , 107 ( P ) , 108 ( P ) , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115, 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134 , 135 ( P ) , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 ( P ) , 145 ( P ) , 171 ( P ) , 172 , 173 ( P ) , 174( P ) , 175 , 176 , 177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186 , 187 , 188 , 189 ( P ) , 190 ( P ) , 191 , 192 , 196 ( P ) , 225 ( P ) , 226 , 227 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 233,234,235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245, 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 324 ( P ) , 327 , 328 ( P ) , 331 ( P ) , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 ( P ) , 419 , 420 , 421 ( P ) , 423,424 ( P ) , 425 , 426 , 428 , 429,430,431,432,433,434,435 , 436 , 437 , 439 ( P ) , 440 ( P ) , 542 ( P ) 、 587 , 588 , 589 , 1247 , 1248 , 1256 , 1257 , 1261 , 1262 , 1263 , 1264 , 1265 , 1266 , 1267 , 1268 , 1269 , 1270 , 1271 , 1272 , 1273 , 174 , 1275 , 1276 , 1277,1278 , 1279,1280 , 1281 , 1282 , 1283 , 1284 , 1285 , 1286 , 1287 , 1288 , 1289 , 1290 , 1291 , 1292 , 1293,1294,1295,1296 , 1297,1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 ( P ) . 1307 , 1308 , 1363 ( P ), 1365 , 1366 , 1369 , 1370 , 1371,1373 , 1374 , 1375 ( P ) , 1447 ( P ) , 1-465 ( P ) , 1466 , 1467 , 1468 , 1-469 , 1470( P) . 1476 ( P ) , 1477 ( P ) , 1478 , 1479 , 1480 , 1481 , 1482 , 1483 , 1484 , 1485 , 1486 , 1487 , 1488 , 1489 , 1490,1491 , 1492 , 1493,1494, 1495 , 1496 , 1497 , 1498 , 1499 , 1500 , 1504 ( P) , 1508 ( P ) , 1509 ( P) , 1510 , 1511 , 1512 , 1513 , 1514 , 1515, 1516 , 1517 , 1518 , 1519 , 1520 , 1521 , 1522 , 1523 , 1524 , 1525 ( P ) , 1527 , 1528,1529,1530,1531,1532,1533,1534,1535,1544 , 1545 , 1546 , 1547,1548 , 1549 ( P ) , 1550 , 1551 ( P) , 1552 ( P ) , 56/2067 , 113/2068 , 101/2070 , 140/2080 , 248/2084 , 1248/2103 , 1467/2104 , 1524/2106 , 233 /2116,174 /2128 ( P ) , 174/2129 .

P. S. - Faridpur

Mouza - Balijuri ( Under Village - Balijuri ) J. L. Number - 16

R. S. Plot numbers : ( Mining Rights )

135 ( P ) , 141 ( P ) , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 ( P) , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157, 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 ( P ) , 173 ( P ) , 174 ( P ) , 189 ( P ) 、 190 ( P ) 、 193.194.195,196 ( P ) , 197 , 198 , 199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222, 209,210 , 218.219,220 , 223 224,225 ( P ) , 228,232,421 ( P ) , 424( P) , 438 , 439 ( P ) , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444 , 445 , 446 , 447 , 448 , 449 , 450,451 , 452 , 453,454,455,456,457,458 , 459,460,461,462 , 463 , 464,465,466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485,486 , 487,488,489,490,491,492,493 , 494 , 495 , 496,497,498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511,512,513 , 514,515,516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521,5 25 ( P ) , 533,535,536,537,538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 ( P ) , 543 , 544, 545, 546,547,548,550 , 566,567,568,569,570,571,572,573,574,576 ( IP ) , 577,578,579,580 , 581,582,583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 594 ( P ) , 595 ( P ) , 567.2073 , 206 2081,160/2082,210 / 2083,424 / 2087,424 / 2088 , 501/2089 , 205/2112 , 168/2113, 168/2114 , 151/ 2115,574 / 2121,578 / 2122 ( P ) . 174 2128 ( P ), 1446 ( P ) , 1447 ( P ) , 1470 ( P ) , 1471 , 1472,1473 , 1474 , 1475 , 1476 ( P ) , 1477 ( P ) .

Mouza - Sirsha

J. L. Number - 17

P. S.- Faridpur

R. S. plot numbers :-( All Rights )

843 ( P ) , 1169 ( P ) , 1676 ( P ) , 1677 ( P ) , 1678 , 1679 , 1680 , 1681 , 1682 , 1683 , 1684 , 1685 , 1686 , 1687 , 1688 , 1689 , 1690 , 1691 , 1692 , 1693 , 1694 , 1695 , 1698 , 1699 , 1700 , 1701 , 1702,1703,1704 , 1705,1706 ( P ) , 1707 , 1708,1709 , 1710,1743,1755,1756 , 1757 , 1758 , 1759,1761 ( P ) , 1762,1763,1764,1765,1766,1767 , 1768 , 1769 , 1770 , 1771 , 1772 , 1773 , 1774 , 1775 , 1776 , 1777,1778 , 1779,1780 , 9069 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 / पौष 4 , 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1781,1782 , 1783,1784, 1785 , 1786 , 1787 , 1788 , 1789 , 1790 , 1791 , 1792 , 1793 , 1794, 1795 , 1796 , 1797 , 1798 , 1799,1800,1801 , 1802 , 1803 , 1804, 1805 , 1806 , 1807 , 1808 , 1809 , 1810, 1811 , 1812 , 1813 , 1814 , 1815 , 1816, 1817 , 1818 , 1819 , 1821 , 1822 , 1823 , 1824, 1825 , 1826 , 1827 , 1828 , 1829 , 1830 , 1831 , 1832 , 1833 , 1834 , 1835 , 1836 , 1837 , 1838 , 1839 , 1840 , 1841 , 1842 , 1843 , 1844 , 1845 , 1846 , 1847 , 1848 , 1849 , 1850,1851 , 1852,1853 , 1854 , 1855 , 1858 , 1859 , 1944 , 1945 (P) , 1946 , 1961 , 1962 , 1963 , 1964 , 1965 , 1966 , 1967 , 1968 (P) , 1969 , 1970, 1971 , 1972 , 1973 , 1974 , 1975 , 1976 , 1977 , 1978 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , 1983 , 1984 , 1985 , 1986 , 1987 , 1988 , 1989, 1990 , 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995 , 1996 , 1997, 1998 , 1999 , 2000, 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2004 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009, 2010, 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , 2024 , 2025 , 2026 , 2027 , 2028 , 2029 , 2030, 2031,2032 , 2033 , 2034 , 2035 , 2036 , 2037 , 2038 , 2039 , 2040 , 2041,2042 , 2043,2058 (P ), 1684/2343 , 1968/2344 , 1793/2378,1737/2384.

Mouza - Madhaiganj J. L. Number- 24 P. S. Faridpur

R. S. Plot numbers . : --- ( All Rights )

34(P) , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39(P ) , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 (P ) , 311 (P) , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 ( P) , 320 , 321 ( P ) , 322 , 323 , 324 ( P ) , 325 (P) , 326 ( P) 331 (P) .

Mouza - Benebandi J. L. Number- 11 P. S. - Faridpur

R. S. Plot numbers : ( All Rights )

143 (P) , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 ( P ) , 181 , 182 , 183 (P) , 215 .

Mouza - Srikrishnapur J. L. Number - 9 P. S. - Faridpur

R. S. Plot numbers . :-( All Rights )

1811 (P).

Line Boundary description :

1-2-3-4 Line starts from point 1 ( Starting point of proposed area ) Eastern part of Plot No. 843 of Mouza - Sirsha , J.L.No. - 17 and passes along Southern line of Plot No. 1168 and meets at Point 2. Line starts from point 2 South- East corner of Plot No. 1168 and passes along middle of 1169 Northern part of Plot No. 2058 , Northern line of Plot No. 1944 , middle of Plot No. 1945 , Northern line of Plot No. 1946 and meets at point 3. Line starts from point 3 and passes along Western line of Plot No. 1961 , Eastern part of Plot No. 2377, Northern line of plot No. 1855,1858,1859 , Southern part of Plot No. 1676 , 1677 , Northern line of Plot No. 1679 , 1680 , 1691 , 1692 , 1693 , 1695,1698,1699 , 1710 , 1707 , 1705 , middle of 1706 Northern line of 1755,1759 , middle of Plot No. 1761 Northern part of Plot No. 1762 , Northern line of Plot No. 1743 , Northern & Eastern line of Plot No. 1763 , Northern line of Plot No. 2384 , all plots are in Mouza - Sirsha , J. L. No. 17and meets atPoint 4 ( Common point of Mouza - Sirsha , J. L. No. 17 & Mouza- Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 ) as delineated on plan.

4-5

Line starts from point 4 common point of Mouza- Sirsha , J. L.No. 17 & Mouza Balijuri , J. L. No. 16 and passes along Northern part of Plot No. 108 of Mouza - Balijuri , J. L. No. - 16 , middle of Plot No. 107 , Southern part of Plot No. 5 , Northern part of Plot No. 105 , Northern line of Plot No. 103 , Northern line of Plot No. 101 , 2070 , middle of Plot No. 33 , 46 , Northern line of Plot No.47 , Eastern line of Plot No. 49 , 50 , Northern line of Plot No. 54 , Northern - Eastern part of Plot No.589 , middle of Plot No. 594,595 , Eastern line of Plot No. 582 , Southern part of Plot No. 578 , Northern part of Plot No.577 , Eastern line of Plot No.579 , 574 , 573 , Northern line of Plot No. 566 , middle of Plot No. 551 , 549 , Northern line of Plot No.533 , 535 , 521 , middle of 1446 , Northern part of 1470 , Northern part of Plot No. 1447 , Northern line of Plot No.1467 , 1466 , middle of Plot No. 1465 , Northern line of Plot No. 1371 , 1369 , 366 , 1365 , middle of Plot No. 1363 , Northern line of Plot No. 1515 , 1516 , 1518 , Western & Northern line of Plot No. 1308 , Northern line of Plot No.1307 , middle of Plot No. 1301 , Northern line of Plot No. 1247 , middle of Plot No. 1248 , Eastern line of Plot No.1265 , Northern line of Plot No. 1256 , plots are in Mouza- Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 and meets at Point 5 ( Common point ofMouza - Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 & Mouza - Benebandi , J.L.No. 11 ) as delineated on plan .

5-5A

Line starts from point 5 Common point of Mouza - Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 & Mouza- Benebandi , J.L. No. 1 land passes along Eastern line of Plot No. 1257 , 1261 , of Mouza - Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 and meets at Point 5A of Mouza - Balijuri , J. L. No. 16 as delineated on plan .

5A-6 Line starts from point 5A South- East corner of Plot No. 1261 and passes along Southern line of Plot No. 1260 and meets at Point 6 ( Common point of Mouza - Benebandi , J. L. No.11 & Mouza- Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 ) as delineated on plan .

6-7

Line starts from Point 6 Common point of Mouza- Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 & Mouza Benebandi , J. L. No.1 I and passes along Northern line of Plot No. 171 , 170 , Eastern line of plot No. 177 , 178 Western part of Plot No.180 , Northern part of Plot No.183 and meets at Point 7 of Mouza- Benebandi , J. L. No. 11 as delineated on plan.

9070

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

7-8 Line starts from point 7 of Mouza - Benebandi , J. L. No.1 land passes along Northern part of Plot No. 183 , South-West corner part of Plot No.143 , and meets at Point 8 (Common point of Mouza - Benebandi , J.L.No.11 & Srikrishnapur J.L.No.9 ) as delineated on plan.

8-9

Line starts from point 8 Common point of Mouza- Benebandi , J. L. No. 11 & Srikrishnapur J. L. No. 9 and passes along middle - North of Plot No. 1811 and meets at Point 9 in middle of Plot No. 1811 of Mouza- Srikrishnapur , J.L.No.9 as delineated on plan.

9-10 Line starts from point 9 of Mouza - Srikrishnapur , J. L.No.9 and passes along middle - East of Plot No. 1811 and meets at Point 10 (Common point of Mouza- Srikrishnapur , J. L. No. 9 & Madhaiganj , J. L. No.24 as delineated onplan.

10-11 Line starts from point 10 Northern point of Plot No.331 Common point of Mouza - Srikrishnapur , JL.No.9 & Madhaiganj , JL . No. 24 and passes along middle of Plot No.319 , East of Plot No. 320, middle of Plot No.321 , West ofPlot No. 326 , Western part of Plot No. 325 , Eastern part of Plot No.324 , middle of Plot No. 311 , South western part ofplot no . 158 and meets at Point 11 ( South - East corner of Plot No. 159 of Madhaiganj , J.L.No.24) asdelineated on plan .

11-12-13-14-15-16-17 Line starts from point 11 of Mouza- Madhaiganj , J.L.No.24 and passes along North- East line of Plot No. 159 and meets at Point 12.Line starts from point 12 and passes along West part of Plot No. 158 and meets at Point 13. ( South- East corner of plot no . 37 ). Line starts from point 13 and passes along Southern line of Plot No.37 and meets at Point 14. Line starts from point 14 and passes along Eastern line of Plot No. 38 and meets atPoint 15. Line starts from point 15 and passes along Southern line of Plot No.38 and meet at Point 16. Line starts from point 16 , and passes along Western line of Plot No. 38 , middle- East of Plot No. 39 , middle of Plot No. 34 all points passes through Mouza- Madhaiganj and meets at Point 17. ( South- East point of Plot No.31 of Mouza- Madhaiganj .Also common point of Mouza - Madhaiganj J.L.No.24 & Benebandi J.L.No.ll ) as delineated onplan.

17-18 Line starts from point 17 common point of Mouza- Madhaiganj J.L.No.24 & Benebandi J.L.No.11 and passes along Western part ofPlot No. 183 of Mouza - Benebandi and meets at Point 18 ( North - West corner of Plot No. 182 of Mouza - Benebandi and Common point of Mouza- Benebandi , J. L. No.ll & Balijuri , J. L. No.16 ) as delineated on plan .

18-19-20-21-22-23 Line starts from point 18 Common point of Mouza Benebandi , J.L.No. 11 & Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 and passes along middle of Plot No. 1552 , 1551 , North - East part of Plot No. 1553 , Southern line of Plot No. 1548, 1547 , 1544, 1535 , 1527 , 2106 to Eastern line of Plot No. 1524 and meets at Point 19. Line starts from point 19 and passes along Eastern line of Plot No. 1524 , middle Eastern part of Plot No. 1525 , middle of Plot No. 1508 , 1509 , 1504 , Southern line of Plot No. 1500 , 1498 , 428 , 426 , 423 , 419 , 420 , Northern line ofPlot No. 336, Southern part of Plot No. 335 , Northern part of Plot No.324 , Northern line of Plot No. 326 , middle of Plot No. 328 , Southern part of Plot No. 331 to Southern line of Plot No. 2116 , Eastern line of Plot No. 256 and meets at Point 20. Line starts from point 20 and passes along South - Western line of Plot No. 2116 , 233 , Southern line of Plot No. 236, Eastern point of Plot No. 256 and meets at Point 21. Line starts from point 21 and passes along Southern line of Plot No. 250,251 , Eastern line Plot No. 252,255 , Southern line of Plot No. 254 and all points are in Mouza- Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 and meets at Point 22. (Common boundary of Mouza- Balijuri & Sirsha ) . Line starts from point 22 and passes along Eastern line Plot No.2041 , 2042 , 2043 of Mouza- Sirsha and meetsat Point23. ( Common point of Mouza- Balijuri , J.L.No. 16 & Sirsha , J.L.No. 17 ) . as delineated on plan. 23-24-25-26-27-1 Line starts from point 23 Common point of Mouza - Balijur , J.L.No. 16 & Mouza - Sirsha , J.LL.No.17 and passes along Southern line of Plot No. 2040,2039 , western part of 1968 Southern line of 2344 to middle point of Eastern line of Plot No. 1946 and meets at Point 24. Line starts from point 24 and passes along Eastern line Plot No. 1946 and meets at Point 25. Line starts from point 25 and passes along Southern line of Plot No. 1946 , 1945 , 1944 and meets at Point 26. Line starts from point 26 and passes along Northern part of Plot No. 2058 and meetsat Point27. Line starts from point 27 and all points are in Mouza- Sirsha , J.L. No. I and passes along Northern line of Plot No. 728 and meetsat Point 1 ( Starting point of proposed area ) of Mouza - Sirsha , J.LL. No. 17 as delineated on plan .

[F. No. 43015/28 / 2009 - PRIW- 1 ]

M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

9071

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25. 2010/पौष 4, 132

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 18 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3135.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप-सम्बलपुर-रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाईन " बिछाई जानी चाहिये ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि , जिसके नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अंब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के लिए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के संबंध में श्री प्रेम चन्द्र वर्मा, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप- सम्बलपुर-रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाईन परियोजना , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , बी-ब्लॉक , शाहदेव टावर , पी.पी. कम्पाउन्ड , राँची -834001 (झारखण्ड) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य-झारखण्ड

जिला-खूंटी

अंचल-मुरहू

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम खसरा सं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

(5) (1)

(2)

(3) (4)

19 पोकला-251 774

773

769

768

770

21 772

765

767

775

766

4734GI /10-9

(4)

(5) (2)

(3)

(1)

75 पोकला-251 777

37 763

764

69 791

40 792

90 794

795

89 800

797

798

799

62 238

21 239

97 839

92 236

12 231

47 225

226

46 227

56 217

218

158

159

205

206

204

203

151

चाद-252

101

60 102

107

108

113

109

112

117 9072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25, 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

(1)

(2)

(3) (4)

(5) चारिद-252 118

54 123

21 124

10 125

03 126

70 175

88 176

179

(X) 178

12 105

52 10.1

32 197

(6) 224

(%)

75 236

23 290

00 289

52 287

93 261

16 281

78 284

91 305

38 306

43 307

89 310

61 311

49 312

16 314

37 322

41 319

56 318

57 316

67 331

19 332

74 333

57 335

(K)

08 334

22 336

53 पेरका

172

190

85 हाँस-253

14 52

134

[PART II Sec. 3(ii) | (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) हासा-253 51

(11

37 54

37 49

(1) 48

76 125

1,59

( ۴)

1 147

(X)

197

(0)

198

199

200

10 2184

(0)

10 214

211

( 17

28 203

10 209

70 210

235

70 234

236

47 242

1 245

243

85 244

82 247

02 248

(火)

249

55 405

गजगाँव-254

30 רין

423

000

(07

40 420

(X)

(07

418

(K)

48 417

(X)

10 419

(X)

53 432

(M)

431

(X)

(07

85 434

10 475

(X)

IN 9073 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 / पौष 4 , 1932

| भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(5)

(1)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

324

गजगाँव -254

गजगाँव-254 474

323

473

320

472

184

446

185

461

186

469

187

454

296

455

297

466

298

497

299

465

303

500

300

463

301

462

288

501

286

866

282

864

283

865

281

863

201

868

287

872

गानालोया-273 95

(8)

875

874

877

878

855

1261

906

1518

907

111

908

(09

956

957

(0)

955

965

970

969

964

968

966

967

(X)

974

327

1515

976

(0)

182

975

(00

184

326

(0)

189

325 9074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4, 1932

[PART 11-SFC . 3 ( ii) ] ( 1)

(4) (2)

(5)

(2)

(3)

(5) (3)

(1)

(4)

67 गानालाया-273 188

745

औसकेया -268

01 186

998

39.

187

746

747

01 192

76 00

10 195

999

260

750

28 00

00 248

748

10 00

249

749

70 00

250

751

58 251

379

12 00

252

380

96 00

253

381

16 258

(0)

386

257

384

278

391

255

392

281

366

312

364

00 314

358

10 00

325

360

326

361

49 00

09 329

359

05 311

1018

47 334

353

08 00

82 333

350

08 00

331

351

332

292

09 337

(09

293

51 322

291

02 04

89 338

259

421

280

423

278

51 09

276

(X) 622

04 00

औसकेया 268 768

279

762

275

93 00

995

105

10 763

106

753

274

28 764

000

107

ין भारत का राजपुत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/ पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

तोनेर-269

108

औसकेया-268

103

102

101

100

990

तोनेर-269

989

988

987

986

985

ρι

971

970

969

968

107

108

109

110

111

112

9075

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

266

264

267

265

268

269

246

247

241

236

237

238

240

239

320

505

498

497

469

495

468

470

471

467

465

464

463

460

461

462

458

457

454

432

453

455

452

448

447 9076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II SP 3000

===

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(5)

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 18th December , 2010 435

तोनेर -269

446

443

442

441

398

S.O. 3135 .-- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) & Ranchi ( Jharkhandi a " Paradip - Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited:

400

395

394

And whereas , it appears to the Central Governmaent that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline . it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification .

बालो-270 59

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Any perosn interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the landto Shri Prem Chandra Verma , Competent Authority , Indian OilCorporation Limited , Paradip - Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline Project , Ground Floor , B - Block , Shahdeo Tower , P.P. Compound , Ranchi - 834001 ( Jharkhand ) .

SCHEDULE

Anchal : Murhu District: Khunti State: Jharkhand 86

Khasra No.

Name of the

Area 00

Hre

Are

Village

Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 00

Pokla- 251 774

19 00

773

10 00

769

57 00

768

08 80

770

02 00

149

772

765

150

767

02 148

775

41 00

181

776

07 00

179

766

18 00

180

777

75 177

763

37 176

764

07 207

791

08 209

1(0

792

210

794

00 [फा. सं. आर -25011/ 47/2010 - ओ.आर. - 1 ]

795

70 बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव 9077 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/ पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(3)

(4)

(5)

(2)

(3) (4)

( 1)

(1)

(2)

800

Charid- 252 197

Pokla-251

75 00

224

797

236

798

290

799

52 238

289

00 00

239

287

839

261

16 00

78 236

281

91 231

284

225

305

226

306

89 227

307

217

310

218

06 00

49.

311

158

312

159

314

205

322

206

319

04 204

318

203

316

151

331

61 00

Charid- 252 60

332

333

335

334

336

101

111

102

772

Perka- 255

107

776

108

1091

113

778

109

Hansa- 253

112

04 00

117

118

123

124

125

126

175

135

176

136

179

138

178

139

193

140

195

152

194

147

00 9078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(5)

(3) (4) 00

Hansa-253 146

462

Gajgaon -254

196

501

197

866

00 198

864

10 199

865

200

863

87 00

2184

868

47 214

872

41 211

875

33 203

874

00 00

47 209

877

75 210

878

86 00

235

855

02 00

1261

234

34 236

906

01 242

907

61 245

908

75 243

956

957

244

10 00

247

955

02 00

965

248

85 00

970

249

52 00

969

05 04

04 Gajgaon- 254 405

422

964

10 423

968

51 420

966

03 00

418

967

58 417

974

02 419

327

32 432

976

975

431

51 434

326

12 475

325

46 474

324

323

473

76 04

320

472

184

446

185

461

21 00

186

469

27 454

187

02 00

296

455

466

297

28 497

298

72 465

299

303

500

18 00

463

300

38 9079 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

(2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

(5) (1)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

36 301

Gajgaon - 254

Ganaloya -273 332

288

337

286

322

282

338

283

421

21 281

04 00

423

201

622

768

04 287

Oskeya -268

762

Ganaloya- 273 95

995

45 00

763

07 00

753

764

01 92

03 00

745

01 89

998

04 00

746

1518

111

747

999

28 00

750

10 00

748

70 22

749

66 00

751

58 00

379

96 00

380

70 00

381

01 17

16 00

386

02 00

384

391

392

366

1515

00 182

364

Oskeya - 268

00 184

358

189

360

188

361

186

359

1018

187

353

192

350

195

49 260

351

292

248

51 249

293

66 250

291

251

89 00

259

252

280

51 253

278

04 258

09 00

276

27 257

279

275

278

255

105

05 00

106

281

00 00

274

312

107

314

00 00

325

108

326

103

320

Oskeya-268 102

05 311

07 (1)

101

77 00

00 334

100

08 00

333

08 00

331

4734 GI /10-10 9080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

[ Part 1 Skc.3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4)

(5)

(4)

(1 )

(2)

(3 )

(5)

464

Toner -269

Oskeya- 268

463

460

או

461

72 00

462

9867

00 00

458

62 3

457

63 1

454

48 00

Toner- 269 990

432

% 06

989

452

(0)

20 00

988

455

19 987

453

(09 986

(

448

30 00

985

447

971

435

19 970

446

67 969

34 968

442

000

$7 66

100

(X)

27 97

395

57 95

394

Balo-270 59

107

24 108

109

39 00

110

84 85

99 111

10 112

06 69

02 60

45 00

48 266

(0)

264

01 00

267

10 00

03 265

08 268

X) 269

75 246

10 247

59 241

000

57 236

(02

36 237

()

23 238

149

(X)

(1)

240

10 239

150

05 320

148

505

181

179

31 00

180

00 40 169

177

02 445

176

207

03 179

209

210

467

165

[No. - R - 25011 : 47 2010-0.R. - I ] B.K. DATTA, Under Secy.

9081 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौन4, 1932

(5)

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

नई दिल्ली , 18 दिसम्बर , 2010

257

सोनपुरगढ़ -29

259

348

350

का.आ. 3136. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप- सम्बलपुर-रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन " बिछाई जानी चाहिये ;

347

346

345

344

337

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि, जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपात्रद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

338

343

333

332

322

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है ;

325

326

328

317

761

775

773

772

771

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के संबंध में श्री प्रेम चन्द्र वर्मा , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप- सम्बलपुर - रायपुर राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , बी - ब्लॉक, सहादेव टावर , पी.पी. कम्पाउन्ड , राँची-834001 (झारखण्ड) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

766

अनुसूची

764

अंचल-तोरपा

राज्य-झारखण्ड

763

जिला-खूंटी

1607

गांव का नाम खसरा सं.

क्षेत्रफल

1606

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1605

(2)

(3) (4)

(5)

(1)

1604

1602

सोनपुरगढ़-29 386

23 387

1592

385

1593

-67

378

1594

15 377

1580

15 358

1577

00 241

1543

240

1532

55 244

1516

03 243

1517

251

1515

256

1514

00 00

10 258

1513 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

(2)

(3) (4)

(5) 1503

83 1426

10 1427

20 1428

14 1429

36 1433

(04 1392

46 1391

10 1434

65 1437

72 1390

10 1435

67 1356

40 1357

39 1358

73 1355

08 1326

35 1325

49 1322

31 1321

46 हुसिर -32

1320

77 106

71 109

39 110

11 108

111

00 112

84 133

60 274

52 278

54 270

50 271

10 273

10 268

86 267

269

62 266

265

02 250

43 231

05 232

68 230

79 229

[PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

(1)

(2)

(3) (4)

(5)

नावाटोली - 33 234

66 221

74 220

01 205

03 213

04 211

45 212

08 182

64 184

83 183

92 186

14 187

0.3 188

76 177

100

34 178

00 176

81 165

15 164

52 163

82 148

71 13

26 145

12 144

11 143

57 14

83 16

82 139

36 19

44 138

10 20

19 24

10 112

37 114

78 117

10 115

21 113

41 106

87 41

85 42

94 00

27 00

24 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

03 हुसिर -32

1718

1727

1728

1683

1739

1681

1678

1675

1674

1673

1672

1671

1670

1659

1661

1660

1627

1654

1638

1637

1635

1636

1795

1798

1799

1797

9083

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1)

(5)

1883

हुसिर -32

1884

1869

1885

1886

1889

1897

1896

1898

1899

1900

1704

पैरा -41

1686

1682

1683

1684

1673

1672

1671

1669

1670

1668

1667

1657

1658

1615

1616

1617

1610

1618

1607

1606

470

कोमांग - 42

1857

1856

1858

1855

1867

475

(2) 46 00 38 00 00 61 78 00 04 45 00 10 20 57 00 05 05 00 01 48 58 00 00 17 00 09 87 56 00 02 70 00 01 28 55 00 00 10 00 04 30 54 00 17 64 00 01 64 00 18 19 00 00 34 1726 00 04 94 00 03 87 00 08 43 00 06 73 00 06 49 00 05 11 00 11 80 00 23 34 00 03 05 00 16 01 1682 00 04 55 1685 00 01 86 00 04 06 00 02 67 1677 00 02 48 00 01 92 00 05 31 00 00 36 00 01 63 00 20 90 00 01 06 00 01 33 00 00 90 00 01 46 00 06 25 00 01 71 00 01 24 00 13 42 00 00 10 00 00 37 1657 00 11 31 00 00 70 00 01 00 1666 00 11 05 00 03 93 00 06 69 00 02 21 00 11 89 00 00 10 00 01 21 00 07 48 00 29 01 00 01 25 00 01 72 00 02 10 00 79 00 01 85 00 07 60 00 04 99 1609 00 11 90 00 07 02 1608 00 10 58 00 12 00 07 00 00 02 16 00 05 40 00 11 33 00 14 26 00 05 30 477 00 00 14 00 06 10 00 03 19 00 25 12 476 00 10 47 00 00 21 510 00 11 80 00 01 04 512 00 00 75 00 17 89 511 00 28

1870 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

9084

( 1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

12 गोपला- 43

509

कोमांग - 42

508

516

502

501

517

2198

गोपला- 43

2201

2200

2190

2191

2192

2186

2185

2187

2184

-32

2183

2182

2176

2160

512

513

514

515

516

518

532

533

530

535

529

534

537

543

542

541

546

550

548

549

576

552

575

[PART II - SEC. 3 ( i) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

571

570

569

540

18 572

72 773

1033

1032

86 1031

1030

1034

44 1026

1029

1027

68 1021

1020

1019

47 935

939

87 938

15 942

943

910

951

952

949

954

963

955

94 962

39 961

964

965

898

966

968

18 969

13 897

895

894

10 896

1114

1212 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

9085

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष 4, 1932

(1)

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(5)

गोपला- 43 1214

(2)

(3) (4)

(5)

3193

कमड़ा-69

1216

1215

1225

1224

1232

1231

1234

1233

1364

1365

1360

1362

1363

1361

1355

1356

1351

1357

1350

1345

1348

1347

1349

1358

3145

कमड़ा - 69

3175

3173

3172

3171

3170

3168

3167

3166

3158

3159

3160

3186

3189

3190

3191

3243

3239

3192

69 3194

20 3196

95 3227

52 3223

3197

38 3224

3201

45 3202

3203

3209

61 3208

3210

23 3213

85 2837

51 2838

87 2839

2840

2841

2842

12 2843

45 2844

2819

2809

2810

42 2812

55 2807

2806

18 3492

3491

15 2804

66 2671

2670

2669

2668

2672

11 2667

45 2673

13 2674

58 2666

84 2665

83 2675

35 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 25 , 2010 PAUSA 4 , 1932

9086

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

तपकरा - 78

2676

कमड़ा- 69

2663

2652

2651

2650

2649

2635

2634

2631

2630

2629

2628

2768

तपकरा- 78

2770

2773

2775

2774

2973

2972

2971

2970

2943

2944

2945

2942

2863

2864

2867

2865

2866

2872

2868

2874

2873

2915

2916

2918

2917

2910

2909

3039

3173

3172

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

(5)

(4)

(2)

(3)

3180

3171

3170

3204

3203

3205

3162

1813

3153

3206

3152

3154

3169

3150

3146

3149

3147

3148

3214

3215

93 1804

1803

1802

1801

3216

1794

1798

1789

1795

1796

1782

1781

1765

1764

1763

1759

1760

1758

1754

1695

1694

1693

1692 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

9087

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

1505

तपकरा - 78

1690

तपकरा- 78

1691

1701

1622

1620

1621

1618

1612

1613

1614

1615

गुटूहातू-77 1609

1608

1601

1602

1182

1184

1183

1185

1587

1195

1197

1586

1201

1583

1208

1207

1209

1210

1211

1569

1568

1566

1567

1513

1522

1326

1512

1511

1509

1508

1395

1396

4734Gl /10-11

1397

1394

1399

1400

1504

1503

1442

1441

1439

1440

1747

451

483

490

482

479

493

492

476

494

442

496

495

499

441

527

279

526

525

524

516

511

07 .

515

514

517

367

366

365

377

378

92.

379

354 9088

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

(2)

(4)

(5) (2)

(3) (4)

(5)

(1)

(3)

(1)

87 कोचा- 82

3351

380

गुटूहातू-77

3350

349

76 00

3328

348

36 00

3333

347

3329

65 00

3330

352

3323

3320

3291

13 44

89 00

3292

24 00

3286

3285

61 88

3493

00 00

3498

10 92

3497

3496

93 00

3495

2185

कोचा- 82

3402

[फा. सं. आर-25011/46/ 2010- ओ.आर. - 1 ] बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव

2945

2942

New Delhi , the 18th December , 2010 00

2943

2944

2946

2967

2966

S.O. 3136. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) & Ranchi ( Jharkhand ) , a " Paradip - Sambalpur- Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

2968

2971

2970

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification ;

2972

2973

3395

3394

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in - Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

3393

3387

3390

3391

3389

3380

3354

3359

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty - one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Prem Chandra Verma , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Paradip - Sambalpur- Raipur - Ranchi Pipe Line Project , Ground floor , B - Block , Shahdeo Tower , P. P. Compound, Ranchi - 834 001 ( Jharkhand) .

9089 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/ पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4) SCHEDULE

(3)

(5)

(2)

(1)

State: Jharkhand

District : Khunti

85 Anchal : Torpa

1607

Sonpurgarh - 29

1606

Area

Khasra No.

Name ofthe

1605

Hectare Are Sq. mtr .

Village

1604

(4)

(5)

(2)

(3)

(1)

1602

386

Sonpurgarh -29

1592

387

1593

385

-67

1594

378

1580

377

1577

358

1543

241

1532

240

1516

244

1517

243

1515

251

1514

256

1513

258

1503

257

1426

259

1427

348

1428

350

1429

347

1433

346

1392

345

1391

344

1434

337

1437

338

1390

343

1435

333

1356

332

1357

322

1358

325

1355

326

1326

328

1325

317

1322

761

1321

775

1320

773

106

Nawatoli - 33

772

39 .

109

771

110

05 00

108

82 766

111

764

112

763 9090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBERDECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

(1) (2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(5)

Husir-32 Nawatoli-33 133

274

278

270

271

273

268

267

269

266

265

250

231

232

230

229

234

221

220

205

213

211

212

182

184

183

186

187

0.3

188

177

178

176

165

164

163

148

Husir-32

145

144

143

139

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

138

48 21

112

78 114

117

115

113

106

85 42

94 43

27 44

81 45

24 46

45 57

05 58

-17 56

70 55

64 1718

19 1726

94 1727

43 1728

49 1683

80 1739

1682

55 1681

06 1677

48 1678

31 1675

63 1674

1673

90 1672

25 1671

24 1670

10 1657

1659

00 1661

93 1660

1627

10 1654

48 9091 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(5) (1)

(2)

(4)

(5)

(3)

Paira - 41

1617

72 00

Husir - 32

1638

1610

1637

1618

1635

1609

90 00

1636

1608

1795

1607

00 00

1798

1606

40 00

1799

470

Komang - 42

1797

477

1857

475

1856

476

1858

510

1855

512

1867

511

28 00

1870

509

12 00

1883

508

1884

516

61 00

1869

502

1885

501

1886

517

1889

2198

Gopla -43

1897

2201

20 00

1896

2200

1898

2190

15 00

1899

2191

1900

2192

1704

Paira - 41

2186

10 00

1686

2185

1685

2187

1682

2184

1683

2183

1684

2182

1673

2176

1672

2160

1671

512

1669

513

1670

514

1668

515

1667

516

55 1666

518

1657

532

1658

533

12 00

1615

530

1616

535 9092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4 , 1932

(1) (1)

(2)

(3) (4)

(5)

529

Gopla- 43

Gopla -43

534

537

543

542

541

546

550

548

549

576

552

575

571

570

569

540

572

773

1033

1032

1031

1030

1034

1026

1029

1027

1021

1020

1019

935

939

938

942

943

910

951

952

Kamra - 69

949

954

963

955

962

961

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (2)

(4)

(3)

(5) 964

49 965

74 898

76 966

09 968

969

18 897

13 895

69 894

59 896

1114

78 1212

55 1214

1216

46 1215

83 1225

10 1224

57 1232

17 1231

62 1234

1233

71 1364

48 1365

87 1360

45 1362

1363

1361

73 1355

1356

1351

39 1357

27 1350

51 1345

84 1348

19 1347

40 1349

76 1358

10 3145

11 3175

3173

23 3172

3171

45 3170

75 3168

17 9093

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

(1)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

Kamra - 69

3167

Kamra - 69

3166

3158

3159

3160

3186

3189

3190

3191

3243

3239

3193

3192

3194

3196

3227

3223

3197

3224

3201

3202

3203

3209

3208

Tapkara - 78

3210

3213

2837

2838

2839

2840

2841

2842

2843

2844

2819

2809

2810

2812

2807

2806

3492

3491

2804

(4)

(5)

(3)

(2)

2671

2670

2669

49 2668

11 2672

2667

2673

2674

2666

2665

35 2675

2676

09 2663

95 2652

2651

2650

20 2649

97 2635

18 2634

96 2631

2630

2629

2628

13 2768

2770

2773

2775

2774

2973

61 2972

2971

2970

95 2943

37 2944

2945

2942

53 2863

10 2864

2867

23 2865

2866

65 2872

17 2868 9094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] (2)

(1)

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

(5)

(3) (4)

(5) 2874

1765

25 Tapkara - 78

Tapkara - 78

2873

1764

35 2915

1763

24 2916

1759

06 2918

1760

73 2917

1758

73 2910

1754

03 2909

1695

89 3039

1694

3173

1693

70 3172

1692

57 3180

1690

99 3171

1691

54 3170

1701

10 3204

1622

05 3203

1620

10 3205

1621

63 3162

1618

15 1813

1612

28 3153

1613

07 3206

1614

63 3152

1615

83 00

3154

1609

42 3169

1608

01 3150

1601

37 00

3146

1602

15 3149

1182

38 3147

1184

3148

1183

52 3214

1185

92 3215

1587

41 1804

1195

16 1803

1197

84 00

1802

1586

10 1801

1201

65 05

3216

1583

25 1794

1208

51 1798

1207

92 00

1789

1209

80 1795

1210

01 1796

1211

27 00

1782

1569

55 1781

1568

57 9095 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(5)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(3)

(5)

(2)

(4)

(1)

Gutuhatu - 77 511

1566

Tapkara - 78

515

1567

514

89 21

1513

517

1522

367

1326

366

1512

365

1511

377

1509

378

1508

379

1395

354

1396

380

1505

349

1397

348

1393

347

1399

1400

352

1504

1503

1442

1441

44 00

1439

1440

1747

Gutuhatu - 77

451

483

490

482

2185

479

3402

Kocha - 82

493

2945

492

2942

476

2943

494

2944

442

2946

496

2967

495

2966

499

2968

441

2971

527

2970

279

2972

526

2973

525

3395

524

3394

516

4734GI/10-12 9096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

(1)

(2)

(3) (4)

(5) Kocha - 82

3393

23 3387

3390

3391

3389

3380

3354

3359

3351

ΟΙ

89 3350

3328

36 3333

3329

17 3330

17 3323

3320

3291

13 3292

3286

3285

3493

3498

3497

3496

66 3495

[No. R-25011 /46/2010-O.R. - I ]

B.K. DATTA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 23 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3137.-भारत सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 864 तारीख 30-3-2010 द्वारा श्रीमती अनिमा सैकिया अतिरिक्त उप कमिश्नर, जिला सिवसागर, आसाम को आसाम राज्य में मैसर्स ब्रह्मपुत्र क्रेकर एण्ड पोलीमर लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त किया था ।

और उक्त श्रीमती अनिमा सैकिया का स्थानांतरण हो गया है और श्री हीरा प्रसाद नाथ , अतिरिक्त उप कमिश्नर को उनके पद पर नियुक्तकिया गया है ।

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में और भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 864 तारीख 30-3-2010 को अधिक्रांत करते हुए , नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तम्भ ( 1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्ति को उक्त मैसर्स ब्रह्मपुत्र क्रेकर एण्ड पोलीमर लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए निम्नलिखित अनुसूची के स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में वर्णित क्षेत्र में उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधि कारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त करती है ।

अधिसूची

व्यक्तिका नाम और पता अधिकारिता का क्षेत्र

श्री हीरा प्रसाद नाथ , अतिरिक्त उप कमिश्नर जिला सिवसागर ( आसाम)

आसाम राज्य जिला सिवसागर सी2+ द्रवित हाई वेपर प्रेशर पाइपलादन लकवा से लेपेटकाटा ( सिवसागर खण्ड) पाइप लाइन बिछाने हेतु ।

[फा. सं. एल-14014/18/2010-जी पी ]

स्नेह पी . मदान , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd December, 2010 S.O. 3137. Whereas , in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Government of India vide Notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 864 dated 30-03-2010 appointed Smt . Anima Saikia , ACS ( Additional Deputy Commissioner) Sivasagar to perform the functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act for laying of the pipeline by M/s. Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited (BCPL) in District Sivasagar of Assam State.

And, whereas , Smt . Anima Saikia has been transferred and Shri Hira Prasad Nath , ACS ( Additional Deputy Commissioner) Sivasagar has been posted as her incumbent;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section (2) ofthe said Act and in supersession of the notification of theGovernment of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide S.O. 864 dated 30.03.2010 , the Government of India hereby authorizes the person mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Schedule given below to perform the functions ofthe Competent Authority under the said Act for laying pipelines by the said M/ s . Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited (BCPL) in the area mentioned in column (2) of the said Schedule.

SCHEDULE

Area of Jurisdiction Name and Address ofthe person

Shri Hira Prasad Nath , ACS (Additional Deputy Commissioner ) Sivasagar (Assam)

State ofAssam areas falling in Sivasagar District for laying of C2+ liquid High Vapor Pressure pipeline from Lakwa to Lapetkata .

[F. No. L - 14014/18/10-GP]

SNEH P. MADAN , Under Secy .

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसंबर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3138. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार टी. आई. एस . कम्पनी लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 401/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-10 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -26012/ 1 / 2001- आईआर ( एम ) ]

जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 26th November , 2010 S.O. 3138.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 401 / 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of T.I.S. Co Ltd ; and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-2010 .

[No. L- 26012/ 1 /2001 - IR ( M) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , BHUBANESWAR PRESENT : SHRI J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer , C.G.I.T. - cum - Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

Industrial Dispute Case No. 401/2001

Date of Passing Award 29th October , 2010

Between :

The Management of the General Manager ( OMQ ) , T.I.S.C.O. Ltd. , PO . Noamundi , Singhbhum

... 1st Party Management

AND

Their workman Shri Saubhagya Kumar Mukhi , Qrs . No. F /2RC/ 32 , Joda, Dist . Keonjhar , Orissa

... 2nd Party/Workman APPEARANCES :

: For the 1st Party M/ s . Ashok K. Parija ,

& Associates , Advocates

Management

: For the 2nd Party M/ s . N.B. Chainy,

Workman & Associates , Advocates

9097

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour has referred an industrial dispute existing between the employers in relation to the Management of T.I.S.Co. Ltd. and their workman in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 vide their letter No. L- 26012 / 1 /2001 - IR ( M) , dated 13-06-2001 .

2. The dispute as referred to is mentioned under the schedule of the letter of reference which is quoted underneath :-

"Whether the demand of Shri Saubhagya Kumar Mukhi , Sr. Driver- cum- Havildar Joda West Mines of TISCo Ltd. , for reinstatement with full back wages , inview of the order of Hon'ble Magistrate , Keonjhar isjustified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for ?"

3. The 2nd Party - workman in his statement of claim has stated that he had joined the service initially as a Sepoy in the Security Department of the 1st Party- Management and then he was promoted to the rank of Driver- cum -Havildar and worked in security department at Joda . Although he had rendered 17 years of dedicated service yet he was asked to opt for V.R.S. ( Golden Handshake Scheme ) introduced and prosecuted by the Management - company with a view to reduce the number of employees from the company's pay roll . The 2nd Party - workman had refused to accept the offer and thus he was falsely implicated in a criminal case and was dismissed from service through a camouflaged departmental proceeding . The charges in the departmental proceedings were based on allegations that while he was working in ' c ' shift duty on 30-8-1998 at about 10.40 P.M. he accompanied Mr. Rais Ahmed P. No. 97321 , Driver - cum- Havildar ( P ) who took out the company's jeep No. BEP- 269 and went to the garage of Indra Mistry on the plea of getting repaired the clutch of the said Jeep . At about 11.00 P.M. on the same date he along with Rais Ahmed were apprehended by police patrol while disposing of a part (1.5 meters ) of the 20 meters of stolen copper cable worth Rs . 20,000 from the Ferro Alloys Plant Store , Joda. Earlier to it , a written report was lodged by the Company at Joda Police Station on 29-8-1998 about theft of 20 meters copper cable from Ferro Alloys Plant store yard on 26-8-1998 worth Rs . 20,000 . On the basis of the said report case No. 172 dated 29-8-1998 was registered under Section 379 IPC . On 30-8-1998 the disputant - workman along with Shri Rais Ahmed were arrested by Joda police in connection with the aforesaid case on the allegation that 1.57 meters of stolen copper cable was being carried by them in company's jeep No. BEP - 296 . " He was prosecuted of criminal charge under Section 379 IPC in the criminal court at Barbil and simultaneously was subjected to a departmental proceeding . Upon filing charge - sheet by the Joda Police the charges under section 379/34 IPC were 9098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] framed against him and Shri Rais Ahmad in G.R. Case No. 292/1998 . They were tried jointly and on completion of trial the criminal court acquitted them of the charges holding that the prosecution has not been able to prove the charges framed against them vide its judgement dated 17-7-1999 . In the departmental proceeding almost similar charges were framed . The basis of the charge was the alleged act of committing theft of company's property. In the departmental proceeding charges of misconduct , dishonesty and unauthorized use of company's property were super imposed though the basic charge was that of alleged theft . The departmental proceeding culminated with the acceptance of the findings of the enquiry report which held the charges as proved . The Management imposed punishment of dismissal from service . The departmental enquiry purportedly conducted against the disputant workman being a wholly got up one cannot supersede the decision of the court of law in view of the findings of acquittal recorded by the criminal court and thereby absolving him of the said charge of theft . The finding of the enquiry officer in the departmental proceeding loses all significance and the decision of the Management dismissing him from service is liable to be set aside . Even the charges in the departmental proceedings are not proved . Hence his dismissal from service is malafide , unjustified and illegal . The order of dismissal in the departmental proceeding on the same charge cannot be sustained in law and he is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages with interest .

disposing of a part ( 1.57 meters ) of the 20 meters of stolen copper cable worth Rs . 20,000 . The police also seized the company's jeep No. BEP - 269 along with recovered copper cable . The case was filed in the court of Judicial Magistrate ( 1 st Class ) , Barbil which was registered as G.R. Case No. 292/98 . Departmental enquiry was also proceeded against the disputant- workman and Shri Rais Ahmed and a charge- sheetwas issued on 4-9-1998 in which charges of theft , dishonesty and unauthorized use of company's property were levelled against both . The reply submitted was not satisfactory . Hence a preliminary enquiry was conducted about the incident which was found to be true . Subsequently on 18-9-1998 the Management decided to conduct the domestic enquiry in respect of the charges framed against the disputant- workman and Shri Rais Ahmed . Shri S.S. Hota , Manager ( Personnel ) was appointed as enquiry officer who conducted the enquiry by taking evidence of both the parties and giving opportunity of hearing . On the basis of enquiry report the General Manager of the 1st Party - Management dispensed with the services of the disputant - workman on 23-12-1998 . After dismissal from service learned Judicial Magistrate ( 1 st Class ) , Barbil pronounced the judgement on 17-7-1999 acquitting the accused persons namely the disputant- workman and Shri Rais Ahmed . After pronouncement of the judgement by the learned Judicial Magistrate ( 1st Class ) , Barbil the disputant - workman raised an industrial dispute before the conciliation officer i.e. Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Rourkela . The conciliation ended in failure . Hence on the report of the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Rourkela this reference was made . It has been further submitted that the jeep bearing No. BEP - 269 was not defective on 30-8-1998 at 10.40 P.M. The alleged defect in the clutch plate of the jeep was incorrect and baseless . The place where the jeep allegedly broke down was hardly 200 feet away from the security control room , but the disputant - workman did not inform the said fact and went to the garage of Indra Mistry which is situated near the establishment of Shri Sangram Swain@Kalu . It is settled law that the result ofthe criminal case has no bearing on the domestic enquiry . More- so , the charges framed against the disputant - workman in both the proceedings are different and the departmental enquiry cannot be held bad in law in view of the order of the acquittal recorded by the criminal court . Hence the present case is liable to be dismissed .

5. The disputant- workman filed objection to the written statement of the 1st Party - Management alleging that the charges in the departmental proceedings were not proved against him though he was punished , while acquitted of the same charge in the criminal proceeding . The departmental proceeding was sequel of criminal proceeding . The allegations in both the proceedings were more or less the same . Therefore the order of dismissal on the same charges is not sustainable in the eyes of law.

4. The 1st Party - Management filed the written statement controverting the allegations contained in the statement of claim . Their further contention is that the reference is not maintainable in view of the undisputed facts of the case and dismissal of the disputant- workman after domestic enquiry conducted in accordance with the provisions of certified standing order. Acquittal of the disputant- workman in the criminal case has no bearing on the charges framed in the departmental proceeding. It is revealed from the facts of the case that on 26-8-1998 the Dy. Manager , Security Mr. Mahendra Prasad received a letter from the Divisional Manager to the effect that 20 meters of copper cable worth of Rs . 20,000 was stolen from the Ferro Alloys Plant Store Yard who in turn informed Jeda Police Station . A case No. 172/98 was registered under Section 379 IPC at Joda Police Station on 29-8-98 . The disputant- workman was on duty in ' C ' Shift of 30-8-1998 i.e.from 10 P.M. to 6 A.M. Mr. Mahendra Prasad , Dy . Manager , Security instructed Md . Rais Ahmed at about 10.30 P.M. to bring Shri B. Tiu from his , house . Shri Rais Ahmed at about 10.40 P.M.drove the Jeep No. BEP - 269 being accompanied by the disputant - workman to fetch Shri B. Tiu from his house . Thereafter Shri Rais Ahmed and the disputant- workman went to the garage of Indra Mistry directly on the plea of repairing the clutch of the said jeep without going to the residence of Shri B.Tiu . They were apprehended by the police while

6. During the pendency of the reference the 2nd Party- workman died . Hence his legal heirs namely Smt .Urmila Mukhi (wife ) , Jayanti Mukhi ( daughter ) , Shyam [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Sundar Mukhi (father ) and Keshari Mukhi ( mother ) were substituted in his place .

7. Following issues were framed on the basis of the pleadings of the parties .

ISSUES

1. Whether the demand of Shri Saubhagya Kumar Mukhi , Sr. Driver - cum - Havaldar , Joda West Mines ofTISCo Ltd. , for reinstatement with full back wages , in view of the order of Hon'ble Magistrate , Keonjhar isjustified?

2. To what relief the 2nd Party - workman is entitled?

3. Whether the charges in the departmental proceeding and in the criminal proceedings are same and identical basing on same sets of fact ?

8. Both the parties have not led any oral evidence in the case and only relied on the documents filed by both of them .

FINDINGS

Issue No. 3

9. Since this issue pre - requires consideration and decision before coming to the question of justification of the demand of the disputant - workman regarding reinstatement in service , this issue is taken up first . The whole episode revolves round the alleged fact of theft of 20 meters of copper cable worth Rs . 20,000 reported to Joda Police Station by Dy . Manager , Security Mr. Mahendra Prasad on 29-8-1998 . Subsequent to the filing ofthe report , the disputant - workman along with co - worker Md . Rais Ahmad were arrested by the Joda Police while disposing of a part ( 1.57 meters ) out of 20 meters of copper cable stolen from Ferro Alloy Plant Store yard . The disputant- workman was tried along with Md . Rais Ahmad for the alleged offence of theft under Section 379/34 IPC and they are acquitted of the charge on 17-7-1999 . A departmental proceeding was also taken up and in the domestic enquiry based on charges of theft , dishonesty and unauthorized use of company's property the disputant- workman and Md . Rais Ahmad were found guilty and consequently were awarded punishment of dismissal from service .

10. The contention of the disputant- workman is that both the criminal and departmental proceedings were held on the same and identical charges constituting same set of facts . Undoubtedly both the proceedings arose out of the alleged offence of theft . There has not been quoted any instance of previous misconduct of dishonesty or act like theft , or misappropriation or unauthorized use of company's property against either of the two workmen . The offence of theft always involve dishonest intention and unauthorized use of one's property without one's consent . Hence the charges of dishonesty and unauthorized use of company's property cannot be said to be distinct and separate from the act of theft .

9099

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसंबर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

Misconduct is a widespread term and every action which is against proper and fair conduct can be called misconduct. Therefore the act of theft may also come under the circumference of the term ' misconduct ' . In my view the charges framed in the departmental proceeding or domestic enquiry cannot be separated , though they may seem like separate and distinct charges . It has to be kept in mind that the basis of charges was the alleged act of committing theft in both the proceedings namely in the criminal as well as , in the departmental proceedings . The facts narrated in the charge - sheet of the domestic enquiry and those raised in charges framed in the criminal trial are one and the same . Therefore it cannot be said that the departmental proceeding or domestic enquiry was held on separate and distinct charges from those of criminal trial . Both the proceedings started on the same set of facts and the charges based on those set of facts , by any reason , cannot be held distinct and separate . Therefore this issue is decided in the affirmative .

Issue No. 1

11. The disputant- workman has claimed his reinstatement in service with full back wages in view of the order of acquittal passed in criminal trial . It has been held in Issue No.3 that the charges in both the criminal and departmental proceedings were the same and identical . Therefore it has to be seen as to whether the order of acquittal passed in criminal trial has to be followed and the findings of the domestic enquiry are to be set aside ?

12. The contention of the disputant - workman is that the proceedings in the domestic enquiry and criminal trial were initiated on the basis of report of theft and similar and identical facts were set in both the proceedings and even the evidence led by the prosecution was the same and identical . The judgement given in the criminal trial has to be followed and the findings given in the domestic enquiry should not have been different . The Enquiry Officer purposely brushed aside and over looked the statement of Shri C.K. Jha and witnesses of the workman and relied upon the statements of Management witnesses to uphold the charges against the disputant - workman . On casting a sight on the judgement of the criminal case and the fmdings of the enquiry officer it comes to notice that Shri Mahendra Prasad , Dy . Manager , Security ; Mr. Prabodh Kumar Satpathy, Divisional Manager , Ferro Alloys Plant , Joda and Babaji Debnathan were the common witnesses in both the proceedings . They all are formal witnesses and have not seen the disputant- workman and Md . Rais Ahmad stealing the copper cable from Ferro Alloys Plant Store , yard , Joda and the recovery of 1.57 meters copper cable from the disputant - workman and Md . Rais Ahmad was not made before them by the police . All the witnesses of seizure of the stolen property, who were produced before the learned Magistrate , had turned hostile . In the domestic enquiry it was not brought to light as to who had stolen the 20 meters copper cable from the Ferro Alloys Plant 9100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

ofPolice , New Delhi -Versus- Narender Singh reported in (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 265 the same view was adopted and it was held that if an employee has been acquitted of a criminal charge , the same by itself would not be a ground not to initiate a departmental proceeding against him or to drop the same in the event an order of acquittal is passed . In the case of Manager , Reserve Bank ofIndia -Versus- S Mani reported in ( 2005) 5 S.C.C. 100 it was held that " it is trite that a judgement of acquittal passed infavour of the employees by giving benefit of doubt per se would not be binding up on the employer" .

14. On the other hand , the disputant - workman has relied upon the ruling given in the case of " G.M. Tank - Versus- State of Gujarat and Another " reported in Air 2006 Supreme Court 2129. In this case the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that where the departmental enquiry and criminal proceedings were based on identical and similar set of facts and evidence and the same witnesses were examined in criminal case and the criminal court honourably acquitted the employee , findings to contrary recorded in the departmental proceedings were unfair and oppressive and the dismissal order is liable to be set aside .

Stores Joda and a part ( 1.57 meters ) out of 20 meters of copper cable was actually recovered from the possession of the accused persons i.e. the disputant - workman and Md . Rais Ahmad . There is also no direct evidence on record that the disputant- workman was contacting persons to sell the recovered copper cable . It cannot be easily swallowed that 20 meters of copper cable was stolen and only 1.57 meters was kept by the disputant - workman in the company's jeep which was merely worth of Rs . 1,500 . It also cannot be believed that the disputant- workman and Md . Rais Ahmad rushed to the garage of Indra Mistry to sell out 1.57 meters of copper cable near about midnight when he was asked to bring Shri Tiu from his residence . According to his version he went to the garage of Indra Mistry for the repair of the clutch of the jeep . It was admitted by Shri C.K. Jha Management Witness No.1 in his cross -examination by the disputant - workman that the disputant-workman had told him about the clutch problem of the vehicle . All this is being discussed to come to a conclusion as to whether there is any iota of evidence on the probability of committing theft by the disputant- workman and Md . Rais Ahmad and recovery of a part of the stolen copper cable from their possession on the fateful night . There was no copper cable found in the said jeep when it was started from the main gate of the company. The jeep was checked by Shri R.S. Singh at that time. It is not revealed as to how 1.57 meters of copper cable came in the meantime in the jeep when it is stated that the disputant-workman and Md . Rais Ahmad directly wentto the garage of Indra Mistry and within a short span of time they are shown to be engaged in disposing of a part ( 1.57 meters) of the stolen copper cable . Sangram Swain who was examined as Prosecution witness in the criminal trial has denied that he was asked by the accused persons to keep the articles in his shop and pay for it or arrange customers for the articles . He has also denied recovery. He was not examined in the departmental proceedings . Thus the introduction of the story of Shri Sangram Swain @ Kalu is alien to the fact of theft and does not appear to have any concern with the disputant- workman on the alleged facts . All this does not bring out a case oftheft and recovery of a part of stolen copper cable from the disputant-workman .

15. Here in this case three witnesses common to the departmental enquiry and criminal proceedings were examined by the prosecution side. Besides them , four witnesses were examined to prove recovery of a part of the stolen property in the criminal proceedings , whereas one extra witness was examined in the departmental enquiry leaving apart the witnesses examined by the disputant- workman in his defence . When the witnesses of recovery examined in the criminal proceedings turned hostile , the fact of recovery of a part of stolen property from the possession of the disputant - workman and Shri S.K. Mukhi cannot be held proved . The witnesses examined in the departmental enquiry by the disputant- workman were defence witnesses . As such they cannot be taken as different witnesses because they were not examined by the Management to prove the charges against the disputant-workman . It has already been said that the set of facts on which the whole episode was woven was that of committing theft and recovery of a part of stolen property viz . copper cable measuring 1.57 meters . All the charges are based on these two facts . If the charge of recovery of stolen property could not be proved against the disputant-workman and his companion , how could it be stated that they were in unauthorized use of company's property i.e. the jeep No BEP -269. There is no case of any previous misconduct or commission of any criminal act against the disputant- workman . As such it cannot be argued that the charges in the departmental enquiry were based on different set of facts or acts of misconduct . The Management has to show that the charges levelled in the departmental enquiry were based on some distinct and different facts , when the charges of theft and recovery of stolenproperty do not stand proved in the criminal trial . It 13. When the facts on which charges in the criminal trial and domestic enquiry were framed are one and the same and the witnesses produced on behalf of the Prosecution/Management adduced no direct evidence regarding the occurance , the conclusions arrived at should not have been different and ifthe conclusions are different , those given in the judicial proceeding have to be honoured, though it has been held in the case of " Southern Railway Officers Association and Another - Versus- Union of India & Others" reported in (2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 24 that " acquittal in a criminal case is not a ground for interfering with the order of punishment imposed by disciplinary authority " . In another case of Commissioner [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

is beyond reason that the disputant - workman is held guilty of these charges without reliable and sufficient evidence . It is true that the judgement of acquittal in criminal proceedings does not make a ground for interference with the order of punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority, but the departmental enquiry must hold the charged employee guilty of charges with sufficient and un- inflinching evidence . The evidence led by the Management in the departmental enquiry , in my view, is not sufficient and if taken on face does not hold the disputant-workman and Shri S.K. Mukhi guilty of charges levelled against them . Therefore the findings of the domestic enquiry are perverse , unjustified and unfair and that cannot be sustained . In these circumstances the judgement of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate (1st Class ) , Keonjhar comes to the help and rescue of the disputant-workman . The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of "M. Ravindran - Versus - The Management of Bharat Electronics Ltd. " reported in 2002 LAB . LC . 1011 has held that acquittal of employee in criminal case on the same set of facts helps in seeking reinstatement . Therefore the principle of law, justice and equity demands that the disputant -workman's dismissal from service must be set aside . As such the demand of the disputant - workman Shri S.K. Mukhi , Senior Driver - cum- Havildar , Joda West Mines of TISCO Ltd. for reinstatement is justified , more- so in view of the order of acquittal of the Judicial Magistrate ( 1st Class) ; Keonjhar . But for the death of the disputant- workman during the pendency of the reference his claim for reinstatement in service has become infractuous and he can not be reinstated in service . He is no more to get usufructs of his demand . His legal heirs have been substituted in the reference who are entitled for the wages which he would have earned if his death would have not taken place . The death certificate of the disputant - workman shows that he had died on 6-6-2002 . Therefore his legal heirs will be entitled to get Rs . 2.0 lacs ( Rupees two lacs only) in lieu of back wages till the period ofhis death . This issue is decided accordingly.

Issue No. 2

16. As per discussions and the findings recorded above , the legal heirs of the deceased disputant -workman Shri S.K. Mukhi are entitled to get Rs . 2.0 lacs in lieu of or as back wages for the illegal and unjustified dismissal of Late Shri S.K. Mukhi from service by the 1st Party- Management . The 1st Party - Management is directed to pay a sum of Rs . 2.0 lacs to the legal heirs of the deceased disputant- workman Shri S.K. Mukhi within a period of three months from the date of publication of the award . Outof the above sum Rs . 75,000 each shall be given to the wife and daughter and Rs . 25,000 each shall be given to the father and mother of the deceased .

17. Award is passed accordingly .

Dictated & Corrected by me .

J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

9101

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसंबर 25 , 2010 /ौष 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3139.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार टेलीकॉम , चंडीगढ़ के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 516 /2000- आईआर ( डी.यू. ) ]

जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3139.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 69/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Department of Telecom , Chandigarh and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[No. L -40012/ 516 /2000 - IR (DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, -1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I. D. No. 69/2001

Shri Avtar Singh S / o Shri Lal Singh VPO Sohana , Tehsil- Mohali , Ropar .

...Applicant

Versus

The Principal General Manager , Telecom, Sector - 18 , Chandigarh - 160001 .

...Respondent APPEARANCES :

: Shri Arun Batra .

For the Workman

For the Management : Shri Anish Babbar .

AWARD (Passed on : 6-10-2010 )

Government of India vide notification No. L - 40012/ 516/2000 - IR ( DU ) , dated 31-01-2001 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , (the Act in short ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal : -

"Whether the action of the management of Deptt.of Telecom , Chandigarh in terminating the services of 9102

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

Shri Avtar Singh S/ o Shri Lal Singh w.e.f. June , 1997 is just and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

After receiving the reference parties were informed .

Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . The case of the workman in nut shell is that he was engaged by the management of Telecommunication department on 01-04-1992 as Waterman . The services of the workman were terminated on 27-02-1999 in violation of section 25 F of the Act . The workman has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination. The appointment of the workman was shown through a contactor which was shame and camouflage as the workman was directly working under the supervision and control of the management of Telecommunication . No notice , one month wages in lieu of notice or retrenchment compensation was paid to the workman before terminating his services . On the basis of the above contentions the workman has prayed for an order of setting aside his termination and reinstating him into the services on the same position he was working before his termination along with consequential benefits .

The management of respondent Telecommunication Department appeared and opposed the claim of the workman by filing written statement . The written statement is very voluminous but in nut shell the management has challenged the master and servant relationship between the workman and the management of respondent Telecommunication department . The legality of the initial appointment has also been challenged by the management .

Both of the parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence . The oral evidence was recorded , whereas , the opportunity for filing documents were also afforded . Vide order dated 06-01-2009 , the management was also directed to file certain documents mentioned in the order in para nos . 1 , 2 , 3 & 4. The management failed to file any such documents .

I have heard the parties at length and perused all the materials on record . Initially , the workman has not filed any documents . When the workman was cross - examined no document was filed but before the cross - examination of the witness of the management, the workman has filed certain documents to prove his direct relationship with the management of respondent Telecommunication department . The management was also afforded the opportunity for cross - examination on these documents . In spite of receiving the copies of these documents the management has not file any original documents nor any explanation given .

The management has challenged the claim of the workman on two contentions :

(1 ) That the initial appointment of the workman was illegal ,

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (2) There has been no master and servant relationship between the management of respondent , Telecommunication department and the workman .

So far as the first contention regarding initial appointment of the workman raised by the management is concern , I am of the view that it is the settled law of service jurisprudence that when a person has been appointed as a daily waged worker and has served the department for substantial period , the nature of his initial appointment is immaterial . Now it has to be seen whether the workman has proved by some cogent evidence that he was directly engaged as a daily wager by the management of respondent Telecommunication department .

The provision of the Industrial Disputes Act , protects the right of every workman . The workman may be appointed against the substantial vacancies as per the rules as a daily waged worker appointed by the management . These are two classes of the employees . One class is the employees who have been appointed against the substantial vacancies as per the rules of the department . The second class of employees is the workman who have been engaged on daily waged basis . The difference in two classes is that a daily waged worker has no right to post . Generally, this Tribunal cannot pass any order for regularization of the services of such a workman because it will leads to the inference in the lawful procedure relating to the public appointment . This role cannot be taken up by this Tribunal .

But so far as the other class of the workman is concern , if a daily waged worker has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination , he has a right against illegal termination . Meaning thereby, the termination of a daily waged worker is not barred but the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act regulates it . The termination of a daily waged worker is regulated in the sense that if the services of a daily waged worker who has completed 240 days of work are no more required the same can be terminated by issuing a month notice or by payment of one month wages in lieu of notice and subsequently by paying the lawful terminal dues . If it is not done the termination will be illegal and void abinitio being against the provisions of the Act .

The management has also contended that workman was a contractual worker . When the witness of the management was asked to file any document relating to the workman to prove that he is contractual worker he shows his ignorance about such documents . In spite of specific and speaking order dated 06-01-2009 no documents were filed by the management . On the other hand Shri Avtar Singh , workman has provided with several documents relating to the management . He has filed the copies of the vouchers by which the payment of wages was made good to him . These vouchers bears the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

signature of Avtar Singh and it is also written in the handwriting of some employees of the department that amount was paid to Avtar Singh . Photocopies of the attendance register has also been filed by Avtar Singh which bears the signature of office of the Telecommunication department . There is no where mentioned that this document was prepared for the payment of amount through the contractor. It bears the seal and signature of the officers of Telecommunication Department, and not of any contractor. In the noting above the signature which find place in some of the attendance register, it is nowhere mentioned that workman has worked through a contractor. As stated earlier, that witness of the management also failed to prove that the workman was working through a contractor.

It is undoubtedly true that workman has to prove that he was directly engaged by the management and has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination. The manner of proving this fact depends on the workman . He can opt any method for proving it Prima facie the workman has proved that he was engaged directly by the management. The vouchers filed by the workman shows and proved it beyond doubt that he was directly working with the management . The copies ofthe attendance register also proves that he was directly working with the management . The management was directed vide order dated 06-01-2009 to file the original documents but the management, reasons know to it, failed . It is one of the mode available to the workman to prove the contemion that he was directly engaged and paid by the management by summoning the documents lying in the custody of the management . The management failed to provide with the copies of the documents . Accordingly, adverse inference against the management shall be taken as per the settled principle of service law. The nature of adverse inference shall be that it shall be presumed that workman was directly working under the administrative control of the management , he was paid directly by the management and has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination . The attendance register filed by the workman are up to 1996. The documents relating to 1997-98 were also summoned which the management could not file . Accordingly up to 1996 , it is established by cogent evidence that workman has completed 240 days of work in every calendar year , whereas , from 1997 to 99 adverse inference is taken against the management and the nature of adverse inference is that he has comptled 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination .

Admittedly, no notice one month wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation was paid to the workman prior to the termination of his services which make his terminal illegal and void ab initio being against the provisions of the Act.

4734Gi/10-13

9103

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसंबर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

Whenever the termination of any workman is declared to be illegal and void ab initio against the provisions of the Act, there may be , as per the recent trend in the service jurisprudence two possible remedies available . The first remedy is the reinstatement of the workman on the same position he was working prior to his termination and second remedy is payment of reasonable compensation.

It is also the settled law of service jurisprudence that priority should be given for reinstatement of the workman on the same position on which he was working prior to his termination . It is hereby once again made clear that this order of reinstatement has no concern with the regularization of the services of the workman . The management has unnecessary and unsuccessfully linked these two issues . It is the protection of right to the workman and not the regularization of the services which are the fruits of this order. Accordingly, the management of Telecommunication is directed to reinstate the services of the workman on the same position he was working prior to his termination on enhanced daily waged rates within one month from the date of publication of the award . Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and conduct of the management workman shall also be entitled for the back wages . Accordingly, this reference is answered. Let Central Government be approached for publication of the award, and thereafter, file be consigned to record room.

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3140.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टेलीकॉम डिस्ट्रिकट मैनेजर, बी. एस. एन. एल. , रोपड़ के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 56/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-10 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -40012/335/2001 - आईआर(डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2010 S.O. 3140.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 56/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court- 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Department of Telecom , District Manager , BSNL , Ropar and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[No. L-40012/335 /2001 - IR ( DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

9104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case I. D. No. 56/2002 .

Shri Surmukh Singh , S / o Shri Chota Ram , Village - Chak Karma, P.O. Ghanauli , District- Ropar (Punjab) .

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

...Applicant

Versus

The Telecom , District Manager BSNL , Ropar - 140001 .

Both of the parties were afforded the opportunity foradducing evidence . The workman filed his aftidavit to prove his claim and he was cross - examined by learned counsel for the management . Shri Malkeet Singh and Shri Maher Singh filed their affidavits on behalf of the management and they were cross -examined by learned counsel for the workman . Documentary evidence has also been filed by the management . No documents were filed by the workman . The workman has only filed some photocopies of the dairy for the year 1998 having some entries . But in these documents the name of the workman does not figure even once . It is not possible to understand for what purpose the dairy was maintained and what relations it has with the workman .

...Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman : Workman in person

For the Management : Shri Deepali Puri

Award

Passed on : 6-10-10

Government of ladia vide Notification No. L -400 12/ 335/2001 - IR ( DU ) , dated 14-03-2002 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the industrial Disputes Act, ( the Act in short ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

" Whether the action of the management of Telecom , District Manager, BSNL , Ropar in terminating the services of Shri . Surnukh Singh S/ o Shri Chota Ram , workman w.e.f01-03-1999 is just and legal? If not , to whatrelief the workman is entitled to and from which date?"

After receiving the reference parties were informed .

Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . It is the contention of the workman that he was engaged on 01-04-1994 on daily wages by the management. His services were terminated on 01-03-1999 without a month notice or payment of one month wages in lieu of notice and without payment of retrenchment compensation . Juniores to him were retained in the services , whereas , his services were terminated . On the basis of the above the workman has prayed for an order of this Tribunal declaring his termination order void being against the provisions of the Act . The workman has further prayed for an order reinstating him into the services along with consequential benetits.

The management of the Telecommunication department appeared and opposed the claim by filing written statement . It is the contention of the management that workman was never engaged by the management nor a single penny of money was paid to him and he was never under the administrative control of the management . The master and servant relationship between the workman and the management has been challenged by the management .

I have heard the parties at length and perused the entire . materials on record . The main issue before this Tribunal is whether there existed any employer and employee relationship between the management of Telecommunication department and the workman ? The issue of employer and employee relationsiup has been dealt with by Hon'ble the Apex Court in GM , ONGC Shilchar versus ONGC Contractual workers union , 2008 LLR 801 . In the above judicial pronouncement , Hon'ble the Apex Court has held that to prove the direct relationship between the management and the workman , workman has to prove the following facts : -

(1) That their existed a master and servant relationship between the workman and the management ( workman was directly engaged by the management) .

(2) That the workman was under the administrative control of the managment.

(3) That there was no contractor in between the management and the workmen .

(4) That the payment of wages were made good by the management to the workman directly and not through by the contractor .

(5) At the cost of the repetition the remittance rolls for the payment of wages were made by the managment and not by the contractor .

Meaning thereby, it is the duty of the workman to prove that he was engaged by the management , he was paid by the management and he was under the administrative control of the management. There is not a single document on record to prove such relationship . It is the only contention of the workman that he was directly engaged by the management paid wages directly by the management and was under the administrative control of the management which will not be suffice . The oral contention of the workman is not sufficient to discharge his liability to prove the above facts . On the other hand , the management of respondent bank has filed all the relevant documents to prove that the services of the 9105

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसंबर 25, 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

workman were taken through a contactor . It is true that consolidated wages were paid to the contractor just for supply the labour without naming the labour. In absentia ofany cogent evidence by workman it can be said that it is not bad in law .

A contract for supplying labour can also be given and enforced in number instead of names . In stead of it , the workman has failed to prove the above mentioned facts to establish the direct relationship with the managment . Accordingly there is no force in the claim of the workman . The claim is dismissed and reference is accordingly answered . The workman is not entitled for any relief. Let Central Government be approached for publication of the award , and thereafter, file be consigned to record room .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3141.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डिपार्टमेन्ट ऑफ कन्टोनमेन्ट बोर्ड , मऊ के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 293/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -13012 / 8 / 1996 - आईआर ( डी.यू. ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3141.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 293 / 1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Department of Cantonment Board, Mhow and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L- 13012/ 8 / 1996 - IR (DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT /LC/R/ 293 / 97

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan The President,

Cantonment Board Karmchari Sangh , Office Cantonment Board , Mhow (M.P)

...Workman/Union Versus

Cantonment Executive Officer , Cantonment Board , Mhow, Distt. Indore .

The Director, Raksha Sampada, Headquarters Madhya Kaman , Lucknow(U.P)

...Managements

AWARD

Passed on this 4th day of November , 2010 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L - 13012 / 8 /96 - IR(DU) dated 14-10-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal : -

Whether the action of the Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonment Board , Mhow in not promoting Shri Ramesh Choudhary to the post of Valveman on the basis of seniority after breaking the old procedure rather than to appoint to the junior by direct appointment on the said post is justified? If not , to what relief the workman Shri Ramesh Choudhary is entitled for ? "

2. The case of the Union/workman in short is that the workman was appointed as a Coolie on 30-6-80 and Shri Raja Ram was also appointed as Coolie at the same time . It is stated that Shri Raja Ram and another coolie namely Abdul Bari were promoted on the post of Valveman on 8-9-84 but at that time also there was provision for direct appointment on the post of Valveman under the Cantonment Fund Servant Rules 1937 ( in short C.F.S.Rules , 1937) . It is stated that there was long usage and practice in the Cantonment Board to fill up the vacancy of Valveman by promotion . In the same way the post of Octroi clerk/ Junior clerk was also to be filled up from direct appointment but Shri Pyarelal, Coolie was promoted on 19-8-96 on Octroi clerk . The further case is that on 30-6-94 the Cantonment Executive Officer invited applications by issuing office order from departmental employees to fill up the vacancy of Valveman . The workman submitted application on 4-7-94 before the Executive Officer . It is stated that one Ajit Kumar was working as daily wager employee who had no experience ofplumbering and therefore , for giving favourism to Shri AjitKumar , the Executive Officer did not fill up the vacancy of Valveman on promotion and remained kept it pending for six months and invited application from the Employment Exchange for direct appointment to give the benefit to Shri Ajit Kumar whose sole name was forwarded to the Executive Officer. In the meantime , the management gave him training of Valveman . Thereafter the interview was called out on 22-5-95 but the management appointed vide order dated 29-5-95 to Shri Ajit Kumar showing it as a procedure of direct appointment . There is clear violation ofthe procedure adopted by the managment in earlier cases to give the benefit of his favourable candidate . It is submitted that the workman be directed to be promoted 9106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

onthe post of valveman w.e.f. 29-5-95 with admissible pay and allowance .

3. The management appeared and filed Written Statement in the reference . The case of the management , inter alia, is that admittedly the workman Shri Ramesh Choudhary was appointed as coolie in the year 1980. It is admitted that Shri Raja Ram and Shri Abdul Bari were also appointed as coolie and they had been promoted to the post of Valveman though the rule was to fill up that vacancy of Valveman by direct appointment . The promotion of those employees was against the rules . It may be possible that their promotions were done in view of old usage because before classification of the posts , the post ofValveman was filled up by promotion . The post of Octroi clerk is a promotion post and, therefore , Shri Pyarelal was promoted on the post of Octroi clerk as per rules . It is admitted that the application was invited from the departmental employees for appointment of Valveman and the name was also called from Employment Exchange for direct appointment on that post as per rules . The workman Shri Choudhary had also submitted application . It is stated that the post was not filled up then and there because the application was called for from Employment Exchange as per rules . After receipt of the name from the Employment Exchange , the appointment was done . It is true that the departmental employees were also called for interview on 22-5-95 . It is stated that the appointments are being done under C.F.S.Rules , 1937 and the classification of the posts wasordered in the year 1978 and it is being followed. It is stated that the appointment of Shri Ajit Kumar by the management was on the basis of rules . On these grounds , it is submitted that the action of the management is justified.

4.The following issues are settled for adudications- I. Whether the action of the Cantonment ExecutiveOfficer, Cantonment Board , Mhow for not promoting Shri Ramesh Choudhary to the postof Valveman on the basis of seniority after breaking the old procedure rather than to appoint to the junior by direct appointment on the said post is justified ?

II . If so , what relief the workman is entitled to?

5. Before discussing the issues , it is important to note the following admitted facts:

1. The workman Shri Ramesh Choudhary was appointed as a coolie in the year 1980 .

2. Shri Raja Ram and Shri Abdul Bari were also initially appointed as coolie but they were promoted to the post of Valveman on 8-9-84 .

3. That time there also was provision for direct appointment of valve man under the C.F.S.Rules , 1937.

4. Shri Pyarelal was also initially appointed as collie and he was also promoted to the post ofOctroi clerk.

5. The Cantonment Executive Officer vide his office order dated 30-6-94 invited application

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] from the departmental employees for filling up the vacancy of valveman .

6. The workman Shri Choudhary also submitted his application for the post of Valveman on 4-7-94:

7. At the same time , the name was also called from the Employment Exchange for appointment of valveman .

8. The Employment Exchange forwarded the only name of Shri Ajit Kumar for appointment of Valveman .

9. The workman Shri Choudhary was also called for interview to the post of Valveman on 22-5-95.

10. Shri Ajit Kumar was appointed as Valveman vide order dated 29-5-95 on the basis of direct appointment .

6. IssueNo. I

To prove the case , the workman has adduced evidence in the case . The workman Shri Ramesh Choudhary is examined in the case . His evidence shows that he was interviewed for the post of valveman but he was not selected . He has stated that no experience was required . Exhibit M/3 shows otherwise that the experience ofplumber was to be given preference . The said document further shows that the post of valveman was of direct appointment . This workman appears to have applied for the post . Exhibit M/2 is his application . This itself shows that the workman had accepted the criteria of direct appointment and applied and faced the interview. It is clear that he had not challenged the order dated 30-6-1994 (Exhibit M/3 ) whereby the application was invited for direct appointment for valveman . He had only challenged the appointment on the basis of promotion when he failed in the interview. C.F.S. Rules 1937 Annexure- " C " also corroborates this fact that the post of valveman of Cantonment Board , Mhow is of direct appointment . I find that since he faced the interview, he is to be estopped from raising subsequently to fill up the vacancy by promotion when the vacancy was filed up by direct appointment by the principle of rule of estoppel . Considering the discussion made above , I find that the managment is justified in not appointing the workman on promotion . This issued is , accordingly, answered.

7. Issue No. II

It is evident that the workman is not entitled to be promoted as valveman in the above discussed circumstances . As such he is not entitled to any relief. The reference is , accordingly, answered .

8. In the result, the award is passed without any order to costs .

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3142.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्थ इर्स्टन ऐप्लीकेशन सेन्टर , बारापानी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , गुवाहाटी के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -42012/42/2008- आई आर ( डी.यू ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2010 S.O. 3142. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 10/ 2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Guwahati as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of North Eastern Space Application Centre , Barapani and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[ No. L-42012/ 42/2008 - IR ( DU) ]

JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT GUWAHATI , ASSAM

Present : Sri D. K. DEB ROY , M.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer, CGIT- cum - Labour Court , Guwahati .

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between :

The Management North Eastem Space Application Centre , Barapani , Shillong , Meghalaya .

Vrs .

Their Workman , Sri Edison Tangsang , Shillong.

Ref. Case No. 10 of 2008 APPEARANCES :

For the Management : 1. Mrs. R. Borah , CGC

2. Ms. B. Deka , Advocate .

For the Workman

: Sri N.G. Shylla, Advocate .

Date ofAward: 12-11-2010 .

9107

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 / पौष 4 , 1932

AWARD

1. The present Reference Case is arising out of Order No.L -42012/42/ 2008 - IR( DU); Dated: 01-08-2008, issued by Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment . to adjudicate the issue as described in the Schedule below:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of the Director , North Eastern Space Application Centre , Shillong in terminating the services of their workman Shri Edison Tangsang . w.e.f. 01-03-2007 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

2.On receipt of the reference case notice was served on both the parties and they appeared before this Court and presented their written statements . Parties adduced evidence in support of their respective claims and the matter was heard.

3. Factual scenario :--

The workman namely Edison Tangsang has submitted his written statement alleging inter - alia that he was verbally appointed as casual employee in the capacity ofCleaner -cum - Sweeper in the Office of the North Eastern Space Application Centre , Barapani , Meghalaya ( in short NESAC) w.e.f. 1st July, 2002 on a daily wage of Rs.50 . Thereafter the workman has been performing his duty as Cleaner - cum - Sweeper from that day onwards . Unfortunately, on 1-3-2007 he was verbally sacked by the Director of NESAC , Barapani , Meghalaya . He requested the NESAC ( in short the Management ) to allow him to continue as temporary casual worker but his request was turned down . It is further alleged that he was terminated from the service most arbitrarily without following the due process of law and even he was not heard. So there was a flagrant violation of the Natural Justice . Thereafter the conciliation proceeding took place but no settlement could be arrived at . In pursuance of the failure report submitted by ALC ( C ) , Guwahati , the Government of India referred this dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

4. The North Eastern Space Application Centre ( in short NESAC ) , the Management contested the proceeding by filing written statement refuting the claim of the workman.

The Management in his W.S. has contended inter- alia that the workman was temporarily engaged as a Cleaner- cum- Sweeper in their Guest House at a daily wage basis . It is further asserted that the NESAC is an Autonomous Body under the Administrative Control of Space and is therefore required to follow the various Rules and Orders issued from time to time by the Government of India . In case of appointment in permanent nature , it is incumbent on the part of the NESAC to adopt due Selection Process and the 9108

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4 , 1932

names of the intending candidates should be sponsored by the local Employment Exchange . According to the Management , no selection process was adopted since he was temporarily casual worker. The further case of the Management is that in such a situation no temporary status could be conferred on the workman and the question of regularization of his service does not arise at all . No attendance Register is maintained for the part- time casual workers. Payment was being made to the Casual Temporary workers on the basis of the report submitted by the Care Taker . The zerox copies of so - called attendance register submitted by the workman is not genuine and this sort of attendance register is not maintained by the NESAC in respect of part- time workers . The further case of the Management is that the Government of India has imposed aban in regard to the recruitment to the post of Gr.D in all Central Government Offices . Due to the embargo imposed upon by the Government the permanent appointment to the concerned workman can not be done . According to the Management the engagement of the workman was discontinued with effect from 1-1-2007 and the cleaning work in the Guest House was awarded to a Contractor/ Out sourcing Agency for engaging persons for Gr - D Posts . The question of regularisation of the workman is not legally sustainable and the petition deserves to be rejected.

5. The workman examined 2 witnesses including himself. The Management on the other hand has examined one witness .

6. Decision and reasons thereof:

Heard both sides at the Bar . The learned Counsel for the workman emphatically submitted that the workman continued in his service as a temporary daily wage earner with effect from 1-7-2002 to 1-3-2007 , so considering his length of service , the service of the workman should have been regularized by the Management . He has drawn my attention to Annexures - 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 .

Per- contra , learned Counsel for the Management on the other hand has submitted admittedly , the workman is a part - time casual cleaner - cum-sweeper at a daily wage of Rs.50 and he was verbally engaged for the said post . No selection procedure was adopted nor his name was sponsored by the local Employment Exchange . So the question of regularization does not arise at all . That apart , due to the ban imposed by the Government in respect of appointment of Gr - D persons , the claim for regularization of the workman also can not be considered . So the case of the workman appears to devoid of merit . Here , let me discuss the evidence on record .

7. W.W.I , is the workman himself has said in his evidence that he was working as Cleaner- cum- Sweeper in the NESAC , Barapani w.e.f. Ist July, 2002 at a daily wage of Rs . 50. The Director , NESAC , verbally instructed him about the discontinuation of his service w.e.f 1-3-2007 . He

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] requested the Management to allow him to continue the service but the request was not acceded to . This witness has submitted the copies of attendance register and one letter Annexure- I , dated 18th February, 2003 issued by OSD , NESAC . This witness has been cross - examined by the learned counsel for the Management . In cross- examination this witness has admitted that he was verbally engaged and no appointment letter was issued to him and he was verbally removed from service . He has also admitted that no selection procedure was adopted and his name was not sponsored by the local employment exchange . He has also admitted in the cross -examination that the payment was made to him on the basis of the report submitted by the Care Taker of the Guest House . He has also admitted thatafter the termination of his service on 1-3-2007 he was asked to continue his work through out- sourcing Agency but he refused to do so . The Management suggested this witness that he has no legal right to continue the service though he answered in negative .

W.W.2 , is also co - worker with the workman . According to him the workman is known to him . The workmanjoined in NESAC in the year 2002. The normal working hours starts from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. He has stated that his service was also terminated on the same day along with his colleague , the concerned workman . In cross- examination , this witness has admitted that the so - called attendance register does not bear the seal of the Management . The Management suggested this witness that the so-called attendance register was not issued by the Management . Annexure - I was issued by OSD but there was no official seal .

The solitary witness on behalf of the Management has said in his evidence that he is the Administrative Officer in the NEAC Meghalaya . The workman was engaged in their Guest House as a cleaner - cum- sweeper with effect from 1st July , 2002 as part time worker on daily wage basis . No selection procedure was adopted nor the name of the workman was sponsored by the employment exchange . The Minimum Wages Act was not applicable to the workman since he was a part time worker. They do not maintain any attendance register in case of temporary worker . According to him the attendance register as submitted by the workman was not issued by the Management nor it was signed by any designated officer . Asper Policy of the Government of India , post ofGr - D has been totally abolished and persons are being engaged in Gr-D postfrom out sourcing Agency. Temporary entry pass was issued to the workman so as to enable him to enter into the place of work . This witness has admitted that the engagement of the workman was discontinued on 1-1-2007 due to the implementation of the new Policy of the Government prohibiting recruitment of Gr - D post . According to him , Annexure - l was not issued from his Office . Since the workman was purely temporary casual workers his staking claim of regularization does not arise at all . In cross- [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

examination, this witness has admitted that there is no permanent staff in Gr. C & D in their department . No appointment letter was issued to the workman , simply he was engaged verbally. Mark' X' is an attendance register in respect of the workman . In cross - examination , this witness has admitted that the so - called attendance register was observed by the Care Taker of the Guest House . It was suggested by the workman that concerned workman was illegally terminated from service though he answered in negative .

8. I have meticulously gone through the evidence adduced by the workman vis - a - vis the evidence adduced by the Management . The learned Counsel for the workman submitted that in view of the Annexures - 9,10,11,12 , the service of the workman should have been regularized by the Management . I have considered Annexure - 9 , dated 29-3-2007 , issued by Assistant Director , National Commission for Schedule Tribes requesting the Management to consider the case for regularization . Similar request was made to the Management by Asstt . Director, National Commission for Schedule Tribes , Govt . of India , Regional Office Shillong , vide Annexure - 10 . I have also gone through Annexure - 11 and 12. I have also considered Annexure - I . which shows that it was issued by OSD on 18th February, 2003 prescribing the office hours from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. The letter does not bear any official seal . Even if, this Annexure - 1 is considered it does not confer any right to the workman for regularization . There is a statutory Rules for recruitment and no appointment shall be made dehors Recruitment Rules .

I do not find any substance in the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the workman.

9. From the evidence it is thus seen that the workman was temporarily engaged as cleaner - cum - sweeper in the Guest House at a daily wage basis of Rs . 50. It is also admitted position that no recruitment procedure was adopted before his temporary engagement , nor his name was sponsored by the local employment exchange .

10. Learned counsel for the Management during the course of argument has rightly pointed out that in such engagement ; question of regularization does not arise . It is further argued that due to the ban imposed by the Government of India in respect to the appointment to the Gr.D post , the Management does not have any legal right to appoint any person in Gr.D post permanently . In this regard , Learned counsel for the Management relied on a decision reported in (2006 ) 4 SCC 1 , Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors . vs Umadevi and Ors . , wherein it has been emphasised that fortuitous service rendered on a fixed pay or on daily wage though may have continued for long, will by itself not vest in an incumbent a right for regularization . The learned Counsel for the Management also relied on W.P. ( C ) 1595/2007 , Amarjit Kaur vs The

9109

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

Union of India & Ors . , wherein it has been observed by the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court that in case of temporary daily wage earner , his regularization of service can not be recognized legally .

11. In this context let me refer the following decisions oftheApex Court :-

Reported in (2009 ) 4 SCC , State of Karnataka and Ors. - vs-G.V. Chandrashekhar , wherein the Apex Court has reiterated that ad hoc appointment even if it continues for a long time can not be ordered to be regularized .

Reported in ( 1994) 4 SCC 138 , Umesh Kumar Nagpal- Vs- State of Hariyana , wherein it has been observed " equality Clause as enshrined in Article 16 mandates that every appointment to the public post or office should be made by open advertisement so as to enable all eligible persons to compete for selection on merit" .

Reliance can also be placed in a recent decision of Apex Court reported in , 2010 LAB IC 2181 , wherein , it has been observed Article 16 - regularization of service - appellant engaged as daily wager- not appointed in sanctioned post- merely because they had worked for 10 years , they would not get the benefit of regularization of service .

12.Having heard both sides and having considered the evidence as discussed above and having regard to the ratio as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court and High Court , I am constrained to hold that no relief can be granted to the workman . The reference , thus , answered accordingly .

ORDER

'The matter stands disposed of . However , no cost . Send the Award to the Ministry as per law .

Given under my hand and seal of this Court on this 12th day of November , at Guwahati .

D. K. DEB ROY, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3143.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुप्रीन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्टस ऑफिसेस , अम्बाला के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , चण्डीगढ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 151/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 85/2006- आई आर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3143. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central 9110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 151/ 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Senior Suptd. of Post Offices , Ambala and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[No. L-40012/ 85 /2006 - IR (DU) ]

JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH

Case ID No. 151/2003

Shri Gurdial Singh S/o Sh . Mehar Singh , Village Changnouli , P.O. Bilaspur, Distt . Ambala (Haryana)

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] of being heard was not afforded to him . The punishment awarded to him was harsh and grave .

The management appeared and opposed the claim by filing written statement . It was stated by the management that management is not an industry and Shri Gurdial was not a workman as per the definition given in the Industrial Disputes Act . A proper and fair enquiry was conducted against him. All the three charges were well proved against the workman . Considering the gravity of the charge, he wasrightly removed from the services .

Partieswere heard in person as well as through their learned legal representatives . File of Enquiry is on record. Onperusal ofmaterials on record , it is clear that workman was charged as follows :--

...Applicant

Versus

The Sr. Supdt . of Post Offices , Ambala Division , Ambala (Haryana) -133001

( 1) While working as EDDA/ R Changeli EDBO in accounts with Bilaspur , S.O. for the period from 6-10-1997 to 7-4-1998 Shri Gurdial Singh remained unauthorized absent from his duty from 6-10-1997 and again from 6-4-1998 to 7-4-1998 without any prior leave or providing any substitute vide him thereby infringing provisions of D.G.'s instruction below Rule 5 of EDAS (Conduct and Service) Rules 1964 issued under No. 43/38/ 72 - Pen dated 24-4-1972 and thus he is alleged to have failed to maintain devotion to his duty as required vide Rule 17 of EDA's ( Conduct and service) Rules , 1964.

...Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

Shri N. K. Nagar

Shri Santosh Kumar For the Management :

AWARD

Passed on 2-11-2010

The Government of India vide Notification No. L- 40012/ 85 /2006 - IR( DU) , dated 15.01.2007 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , (the Act in short) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the managernent of Senior Suptd. of PostOffices , Ambala Division , Ambala in removing Shri Gurdial Singh S/ o Shri Mehar Singh , Ex - Extra Departmental Delivery Agent/ Runner from services w.e.f. 1-9-2000 is just and legal ? Ifnot to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?"

Afterreceivingthe reference parties were informed . Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . It is the contention ofthe workman that he was illegally removed from the services by the management on 1-9-2000 . Proper enquiry was not conducted against him . Proper opportunity (2) While working as EDDA/ R Changeli EDBO in accounts with Bilaspur . S.O. for the period from 30-12-1996 to 5-4-1998 , Shri Gurdial Singh failed to maintain visit book for the period from 23-2-1997 to 1-3-98 , 28-3-98 to 5-4-1998 and also failed to visittheir on2-3-1998, 3-3-1998 ,4-3-1998 , 19-3-1998, 24-3-1998, 25-3-1998 , 26-3-1998 . Judoshekhan on 12-3-98 , 24-3-98 ,25-3-98,26-3-98,27-3-98 , Ramkheri on 26-3-98 , 27-3-98 , Teha on 23-3-98 , 24-3-98 , 25-3-98, 26-3-98, 27-3-98 , and Village Chanwala on 24-3-98 and 25-3-98 thereby infringing Rule 9 of Rulesfor Branch Offices (corrected up to 31-3-82 and thus alleged to have failed to maintain devotion to duty as required vide Rule 17 of ED A's(Conduct and Service) Rules , 1964 .

(3) Shri Gurdial Singh while working as EDDA/R Changnouli EDBO in account with Bilaspur for the period from 30-4-1997 to 20-5-1997 failed to creditamounts of Kota (Rajasthan) V.P.P. No. 878 dated 24-4-97 for Rs . 389 ( including M.O. Commission) and Dehradun VPP No. 1438 dated 1-5-1997 for Rs . 123 ( including M.O. Commission) onthe day ofdelivery i.e. on 30-4-1997 samefrom 30-4-1997 to 19-5-1997 and 5-5-1997 to 19-5-97 respectively for personal use and thus alleged to have failed to maintain absolute integrity and [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

devotion toduty as required vide Rule 17 of EDAS (Conduct and Service) Rules , 1964 .

(4) Shri Gurdial Singh while working as EDDA/R Changnouli EDBO in accounts with Bilaspur S.O. for the period from 2-4-98 to 5-4-98 failed to render return of articles transferred to him for delivery on above dates and also enter such articles in his postman book thereby infringing provisions of Rule 9 of Rules for Branch offices ( Corrected up to 31.03.92) and thus failed to maintain devotion to duty as required vide Rule 17 of ED As (Conduct and Service) Rules , 1964.

Bothofthe parties were heard on the issue of fairness of enquiry . The issue of fairness of enquiry was decided by this Tribunal vide order dated 5-3-2010 . After hearing on the issue of fairness of enquiry this Tribunal has also framed the issues vide order dated 5-3-2010 . The issues framed by this Tribunal are as follows :-

( 1 ) Whether the postal department is an industry ?

(2) Whether the applicant is a workman?

(3) Decision making of the enquiry officer i.e. whether the decision making suffers with any perversity and illegality.

(4) Quantum of punishment .

The issue of fairness of enquiry was decided with thedirection that a fair, proper and reasonable enquiry was conducted by the management and there had been no violation of any rules of the principle of natural justice .

Parties were also afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence . Both of the parties did not prefer to adduce any oral evidence . It was contended by both of the parties that the industrial dispute can be decided on the basis of the materials on record particularly the enquiry file. Accordingly, the evidence of the parties was closed . Parties were heard at length and file was reserved for the award.

So far as the issue No. 1 & 2 are concern , the management has contended that neither the management is an industry nor the petitioner a workman under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (to be referred for short " the Act " ) . That the management is engaged in the research work and does not fall in the category of the industry as defined by Section 2 of theAct. That this very Tribunal has in the case of Ram Dulari versus Officer Incharge , Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute , Chandigarh has held that the management is not an industry. Therefore , the claim of the workman under the Act is not maintainable . Management have prayed for placing on record the copy of the judgment dated 23-7-2002 passed in I.D. No. 22 of 1990 and titled as Ram Dulari v/s Officer Incharge (surpa) .

4734Gl/10-14

9111

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

The Hon'ble Supreme Court has defined the term 'Industry' in the case of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage V/ s A.Rajappa reported as 1978 Lab . IC 778 in the following terms :-

(I) Industrial as defined in S2(j ) and explained in Banerji case, has a wide import .

(a) Where there is a ( i ) systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by co - operation between employer and employee ( the direct and substantial element is chemerical ) (ii ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bless , in making on a large scale , Prasad of food) prima facie , there is an ' industry' in that enterprise.

(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant , be the venture in public , joint, private or other sector .

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test in the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer - employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business , it does not case to be one because of philanthropy animated the undertaking .

(II ) Although Section 2 (j ) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs , the re - meaning cannot be magnified to overreach itself.

(e) ' undertaking' must suffer a contextual and associational shrinkage , as explained in Banerji and in this judgment ; so also the words , service , calling and the like . This yields the inference that all organized activity, possessing the triple elements in I ( supra) , provided the nature of the activity, viz , the employer- employee basis , bars resemblance to what we find in a undertaking , callings and services , adventures ' analogous to the carrying on of trade or business ' . All features , other than the methodology of carrying on the activity, viz , in organizing the co- operation between employee , may be dissimilar. It does not mater if one the employment terms , there is analogy.

(III) The ideology of the Act being industrial peace , regulations and resolution of industrial disputes between employer and workmen , the range ofthis statutory ideology must inform the reach of the statutory definition, Nothing less, nothing more .

) The consequence are ( i ) professions , ( ii) clubs , ( iii) education institutions , 9112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

(iv) co - operatives ( v) search institutes , (vi) charitable projects and ( vii ) other kindred adventure , if they fulfill the triple tests listed in para -I ( supra) , cannot be exempted from the scope of s 2(j ) .

(g) A restricted category of professions , clubs , co -operatives and even gurukuls and little research labs , may qualify for exemption if they are simple ventures ; substantially and going by the dominant nature criterion , substantively, no employees are entertained but in minimal matters ; and marginal employees are hired without destroying the non -employee character of the unit.

If, in a pious or altruistic mission , many employee themselves , free or for small honoraria or like return , mainly drawn by sharing in the purpose of case , such as lawyers volunteering to run a free legal services clinic or doctors serving in their spare hours , in a free medical center or ashramites working at the bidding of the holiness , divinity or like central personality and the services are supplied free or at nominal cost and those who serve are not engaged for remuneration on the basis of master and servant relationship , then the institution is not an industry ; even if stray servants , manual or technical , are hired : Such eleemosynary or like undertaking alone are exempt not any other generosity, compassion , developmental passion or project .

( III) The dominant nature test :

(a) Where a complex of activities , some of which qualify for exemption , others do not , involves employee in the total undertaking , some of whom are not workmen as in the University of Delhi case or some departments are not productive of goods and services is isolated, even then , the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments , as explained in the Corpn . of Nagpur will be the true test . The whole undertaking will be an industry , although those who are not workmen by definition , may not benefit by the status .

(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses , sovereign functions , strictly understood , (alone) qualify for exemption not the welfare activities or economic adventure undertaken by government or statutory bodies .

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to come within s 2 (j ) .

(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions may remove from the scope of the Act categories which otherwise may be covered thereby.

(IV) We overrule the Safdarjung Hospital case , the solicitors case , the Gymkhana case the Delhi University case , the Dhanrajgirji Hosipital case , and other rulings who ratio runs counter to he principles enunciated above , and the Hospital Mazdoor Sabha case , is hereby rehabilitated.

In view of the judgments of the Supreme Court there remains no merit in the submission of the management that they are not industry. The management are producing/ supplying services , with a view to satisfy human wants or wishes , whether or not any capital has been in vested for the purpose of carrying on such activity or carried on with a motive to make any case former . The Apex Court has kept all these consideration away from the definition of the industry . They have laid the stress on the systematic activity organized by corporation between the employer and the employee , for the production or distribution of goods and services to satisfy the human wants and whishes . The judgment in Bangalore Water and Sewerage Board ( surpa) hold good even today and in the face of that , there is no merit in the contention of the management . Accordingly, both of the issues are disposed off with the finding that management is an industry and petitioner a workman.

It is true that workman has also admitted that he remain absent on two occasions and deposited the amount by some delay . On the basis of it , the enquiry officer has held that it was a temporary embezzlement committed by the workman and a major misconduct . Hon'ble the Apex Court in several judicial pronouncements has defined the term misconduct . For misconduct the act which constitutes the misconduct must be committed intentionally. Thus , the management has to prove that act of the workman for depositing the amount by delay of few days was done intentionally . If any act is done without any criminal intention for embezzlement of amount , it may be negligence on the part of the workman but not the embezzlement . While defining the misconduct the Hon'ble Apex Court in Inspector Prem Chand Vs. Govt . of NCT of Delhi , 2007 (4) SLR 243 , Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.B.Sinha in para 8 of the judgment has held , as under : --

"Code of conduct as set out in the conduct rules clearly indicates the Conduct expected from a member of the service . It would follow that the conduct which is blameworthy for the Govt . servant in the context rules out to be misconduct . If a servant conducts himself in a way in [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

consistent with due and faithful discharge of his duty in service , it is misconduct . "

In para 8 itself, Hon'ble the Apex Court , regarding the definition of negligence , errors of judgments or innocent mistakes , do not constitute such misconduct .

There is no iota of evidence on record to prove that workman has intentionally delayed the deposition of the amount with intends to use the amount for his own benefit . The facts and circumstances of the case proved that these were the casual lapses or negligence committed by the workman which cannot be termed as a temporary embezzlement . There is a hair line difference between the act done intentionally and mistake committed by the negligence of the workman. In case of intentional act , it will amount to temporary embezzlement ; otherwise it will be a share negligence on the part of the workman . The share negligence may also constitute the misconduct but the gravity of the misconduct shall be much lesser then the gravity of the misconduct based on the embezzlement.

This issue has not been discussed and dealt with by the enquiry officer while deciding the issue of temporary embezzlement . As stated earlier , there is no iota of evidence on record to prove that workman has any intention to misuse the government funds . Accordingly , in my view, it is the share negligence on the part of the workman and not the temporary embezzlement because it lacks the intention which is the important ingredient of the embezzlement . It was the perversity in decision making of the enquiry officer in holding that workman has intentionally with held, for his own benefit , certain amount for few days which amounts to the temporary embezzlement . As stated earlier , it was a casual negligence on the part of the workman which cannot be said to be temporary embezzlement .

The punishment awarded to the workınan should be proportionate . Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes Act , empowers this tribunal to exercise the jurisdiction in exceptional cases to modify or rectify the punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority . In the case of dismissal and discharge , this Tribunal can invoke the jurisdiction vested under Section 11 - A, if the punishment awarded causes miscarriage ofjustice to the workman . It has also to be seen that punishment is disproportionate and harash then committed misconduct . As stated earlier that it was not the case of temporary embezzlement but the negligence on the part of the workman . Accordingly, the charge proved against the workman is his unauthorized absent on two occasions for few days and negligence ir. depositing the amount delayed by few days . Thus , it is a case where the jurisdiction vested under Section 11 - A, can be invoked by this Tribunal because if it is not done it will cause miscarriage of justice to the workman . Accordingly , by exercising the jurisdiction vested under Section 11 - A of the Act , the punishment awarded by the disciplinary

9113

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/ पौष 4 , 1932

authority is modified. In spite of removal of the workman from the services the punishment is converted into stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect . The management isaccordingly directed to reinstate the workman with all the benefit ofwithin one month from the date of publication of the award by implementing the substitute punishment awarded to the workman by this Tribunal . Let Central Government be approached for publication of award , and thereafter, file be consigned to record room .

Chandigarh .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3144.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पोस्ट ऑफिसेस एम. डिवीजन , लुधियाना के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 317/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 255/2001- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November, 2010 S.O. 3144. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 317 / 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Post Offices ( M ) Division , Ludhiana and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[No. L -40012 /255 / 2001 - IR ( DU ) ]

JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secу .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case 1. D. No. 317/2001

Shri Nachhattar Singh S / o Shri Ishwar Singh , C / o Shri B.N. Sehgal , 49/69 , Harpal Nagar , Ludhiana - 141001 .

.Applicant

Versus

The Superintendent of Post Offices ( M ) Division , Ludhiana - 141001

Respondent 9114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4 , 1932

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

Shri B.N.Sehgal .

For the Management :

Shri Sanjeev Kumar , Inspector Post Office .

AWARD

Passed on 29-10-2010

Government of India vide notification No. L - 40012/ 255 /2001 - IR ( DU) , dated 20-11-2001 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , ( the Act in short ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal : -

"Whether Shri Nachhattar Singh , ED BPM is a workman or not , of so , the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices (M) Division , Ludhiana in awarding the punishment of dismissal from services to Shri Nachhattar Singh S / o Shri Ishwar Singh is just and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

After receiving the reference parties were informed . Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . The main contention of the workman is that he was illegally dismissed from the services as no fair and proper enquiry was conducted against him . It is also contended by the workman that punishment awarded to him was disproportionate to the committed misconduct . The workman has mentioned in para No. 6 of the claim facts affecting the enquiry . According to him he was given the charge sheet without affording any opportunity to reply the same . He was not given any opportunity for cross- examine the management witness and was not also afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence in defence . The copy of the enquiry report was not supplied to him and he was not afforded the opportunity , for personal hearing . On the basis of the above contentions , the workman has contended that there was no fair and proper enquiry conducted against him and consequentially prayed for setting aside the dismissal order and for consequential order reinstating him into the services with consequential benefits .

The management appeared and opposed the claim ofthe workman by filing written statement . It was contended by the management that a fair and proper enquiry was conducted against the workman . He was afforded all possible opportunity of being heard and there has been no violation of any rules of the principle of natural justice . The management has also contended that considering the nature of misconduct and punishment awarded to him by the disciplinary authority after affording him the opportunity of being heard , punished was adequate and proportionate to the committed misconduct.

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Bothof the parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence . Oral evidence was recorded . Entire enquiry file has been filed . I have heard the parties at length and perused the entire materials on record .

The workman was charge sheeted as under : ----

(1 ) That the said Shri Nachhattar Singh while working as EDBPM Dhaipai in a/ c with Jodhan S.O. during the period 21-6-1995 to 30-9-1997 Mandeep Kaur and made entry in pass book . He also authenticated deposit entry by affixing date stamp in pass book on 30-9-1997 in RD a/ c No. 400355 in the name of Miss Mandeep Kaur standing in the books , but he did not account for this amount in B.O. account i.e. in the Govt . account tax and used the same allegedly for his personal affairs .

(2) That during the period 21-6-1995 to 30-9-1997 while working as EDBPM Dhaipai EDEO in a/ c with Jodhan S.O. , the said Shri Nachhattar Singh allegedly accepted Rs . 200 on 12-4-1997 from Smt . Joginder Kaur for RD account No. 400443 and made entry in Pass Book , he also authenticated deposit entry by affixing date stamp in pass book on 12-4-1997 in RD a / c he did not account for this amount in B.O account i.e. in the Govt . accounts and used the same allegedly for his personal affairs .

(3) That the said Shri Nachhattar Singh while working as EDBPM Dhaipai in a/ c with Jodhan S.O. during the period 6-5-1996 to 29-11-1997 had alleged by accepted an amount of Rs . 1800 from Smt . Joginder Kaur for RD deposits in RD account No. 400443 on different dates and made entries in pass book , he also authenticated deposits entries by affixing date stamps in the pass book , but amount of the deposits were taken into Govt . accounts later on instead of actual date of deposit :-

RD a/ c Date of actual Amount of

No.

deposit

Amount taken into Govt . accounts Deposit in pass book

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

400443 06-05-1996 200

05-06-1996 200

08-07-1996 200

08-08-1996 200

11-09-1996 200

11-10-1996 200

1260 [30-10-1996 ] 9115

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4, 1932

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

30-11-1996 200

404[31-12-1996 ] 31-12-1996 200

200

29-11-1997

100 [28-01-1998 ]

100 [ 18-02-1998 ] (4) That the said Shri Nachhatar Singh while working as EDBPM Dhaipai in a/ c with Jodhan S.O. during the period 18-1-1995 to 20-1-1998 allegedly accepted Rs . 1000 from Smt . Kulwant Kaur W/ o Shri Pal Singh depositor of SB a/ c No. 5101921 in Dec. 1995 as per statement of Smt . Kulwant Kaur dated 5-2-1999 and his statement dated 3-2-1999 . He made entry of Rs . 500 in the pass book and authenticated this depositby affixing date stamp in the pass book dated 3-12-1995 and with his signatures . But amount of this deposit was not credited into Govt . accounts and misappropriated by the said Shri Nachhattar Singh . Secondly to cheat the depositor , he showed a withdrawal ofRs . 1000 in SB pass book no . 5101921 or 20-1-1998 but actually this amount was neither paid to the depositor nor withdrawn from Govt . accounts . He authenticated this withdrawal of entry by affixing date stamp dated 20-1-1998 and with his signatures in the pass book . As perstatement of depositor dated 5-2-1999 and statement of BPM dated 3-2-1999 , he misappropriated Rs . 1000 from the SB a / c No. 510921 .

On perusal of the proceedings of the enquiry , it is evidently clear that opportunity for replying the charge sheet was afforded to the workman . He was present before the enquiry officer and all possible opportunity for hearing was afforded to him. On page No. 6 of the enquiry report and the relevant enquiry proceedings it is specifically mentioned that workman has replied the charge sheet . He was afforded the opportunity to engage his defence representative and Shri N.H.Singh was appointed as defence reresentative . On 20-10-1999 and 21-10-1999 the workman has perused all the documents which were filed and relied upon by the management during the enquiry proceedings . He has cross - examined all the witnesses on different dates . He was also afforded the opportunity for defence evidence on 22-11-1999 . He availed that opportunity and as more as two defence witnesses were recorded . Opportunity for written briefs was also afforded by the enquiry officer

From disciplinary proceedings , it is also clear that he was supplied the copy of the enquiry report and afforded the opportunity of personal hearing . Thus , all possible opportunity for hearing was afforded to the workman and there has been no violation of the principle of natural justice while conducting the enquiry proceedings and the disciplinary proceedings .

The workman has also challenged the decision making of the enquiry officer on the ground that complainant Smt . Kulwant Kaur has stated before the enquiry officer that she has not given any amount to Shri Nachhattar Singh . On the basis of the statement of the complainant refusing to give any amount to Nachhater Singh , the workman has stated that charge against him has not been proved properly. Now the question arise whether the quasi judicial conscious of the enquiry officer and this Tribunal should be guided by the fact that complainant has refused to pay any amount to the workman Nachhatar Singh. In my view just on the basis of the statement of the complainant no decision should be taken by any quasi judicial authority. Decision on proving the charges has to be taken on the basis of the perusal of entire evidence . If the other material on the record minus that part of the statement of the complainant refusing to pay any amount to the workman is sufficient to prove the charge , this part of the statement of complainant can be ignored . The documentary evidence in this file is sufficient to prove that some embezzlement was committed by any person . The other substantial evidence proved that workman was in the position to do the Act of the embezzlement . The cumulative affect of the entire evidence is that intention of the workman is also shown . The workman was on the seat from which the act of misconduct was committed . The workman was in a position to commit the same and that act said to be misconduct was committed when the workman was working on that seat . The entire documentary evidence and facts and circumstances of the case clearly indicates thatit is the workman which has committed the misconduct and not otherwise . Under such circumstances , the evidence ofthe complainant that he has not given any amount to the workman can be ignored and the enquiry officer has rightly ignored it . On the basis of the ; above , I am of the view that there has been no perversity in decision making of the enquiry officer and the enquiry officer has rightly held all the charges proved against the workman .

The disciplinary authority after affording him the opportunity for hearing has awarded the punishment of removal / dismissal of the workman from the services which is in my view proportionate to the committed misconduct. Accordingly, the reference is disposed of. The workman is not entitled for any relief. Let Central Government be approached for publication of award , and thereafter , file be consigned to record room .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 9116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3145.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डिविजनल इंजीनियर टेलीग्राफस ( आटो इनस्टालेशन ) भोपाल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 58/1993- आईआर (डीयू) ]

जोहन टोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3145. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 105/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Divisional Engineer Telegraphs (Auto Installation) , Bhopal and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[No. L-40012/58/ 1993 - IR ( DU ) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/ R/105/94

Presiding Officer : SHRI MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN Shri Manoj Kumar ,

...Workman/Union S/o Shri Avadh Bihari , Qr. No.26 , P & T Colony, Dussehra Maidan , Ujjain (MP)

Versus

Divisional Engineer (Telephones ) ,

II -A, Telecom , Ist Floor ,

ZeeTV Complex,

T. T. Nagar,

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] 2. The case of the workman , in short , is that the workman was engaged as unskilled labour from 1-1-86 and worked continuously till 31-3-90 when he was stopped by oral order from work w.e.f 1-4-90 with a reason that his service was no longer required . It is stated that service was being provided to new workman , as such he demanded written order of termination but the same was denied . It is alleged tht he was termianted without one month notice and without retrenchment compensation as provided under Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( in short I. D. Act , 1947. ) It is stated that the management was engaging new workers but on demand it was refused to him and the provision of Section 25 H of the I.D. Act , 1947 was violated. On these grounds , it is submitted that the management be directed to reinstate the workman from the date of termination with payment of full backwages.

3. The management appeared and filed Written Statement to contest the reference . The case of the management , inter alia , is that the workman was engaged as casual labour on exigency of work . The period of his service was maintained in the Muster Roll . The workman had not completed an year of continuous service as required under Section 25 B of the I.D. Act and , therefore , he was not entitled to any relief under the provision of Section 25F of the I.D. Act . It is submitted that in the light ofabove gounds the reference be decided in favour of the management .

4. On the pleadings of the parties , the following issues are settled-

I. Whether the workman was in continuous service for a period of one year during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date of reference under the provision of Section 25 B of the I.D. Act.

II. Whether the action of the management in terminating the service of the workman w.e.f. 1-4-90 is proper legal and justified ?

III . To what relief the workman is entitled ?

...Management

Bhopal

AWARD

Passed on this 9th day of November, 2010 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 40012 / 58 / 93 - IR ( DU ) dated 25-7-94 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal : -

" Whether the action of the management of Divisional Engineer, Telegraphs (Auto Installation) , Bhopal in terminating the services of Shri Manoj Kumar S/ o Shri Avadh Bihari Casual Labour w.e.f. 1-4-1990 is proper , legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for ? " 5. Issue No. I

According to the workman , he was terminated w.e.f 1-4-90 . There is no document on the record to show that preceding twelve months from 31-3-90 , the workman worked 240 days or more . The workman has filed Muster Roll self card but the same is not proved and is not admitted in evidence . The said card shows that his photograph is not certified . However the said card shows that there is no entry since 31-10-88 . This card also does not prove that preceding twelve months from 31-3-90 , he was in the employment of the management . Moreover from the entry dated 1-6-88 to 31-10-88 there is no countersign .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

This card is not reliable and is inadmissible . It does not establish the claim of the workman .

6. The workman Shri Manoj Kumar is examined in the case . He has stated in his evidence that he got appointment letter but no such appointment letter is filed . He has further stated that he had not filed the case . He has stated that 12 months from the date of termination he worked 300 days . The Muster Roll Self Card contradicts that he was in employment till 31-3-90 and also twelve months before such alleged termination . His evidence does not corroborate with Muster Roll Self Card that he had worked 12 months preceding the date with reference .

7. On the other hand , the management has also examined one witness in the case . Shri M. U. Nagori is SDE ( SWI ) , Ujjain . He has supported the case of the management and has stated that he was engaged as casual worker for digging and installation of new line . He has also stated that he had never worked against vacancy and continuously for 240 days . Thus it is clear that there is no any violation of the provision of the I.D. Act . This issue is accordingly answered .

8. Issue Nos . II & III

On the basis of discussion made above , it is clear that the management was justified in terminating the service of the workman who was casual labour . Thus , the workman is not entitled to any relief. Accordingly , the reference is answered .

9. In the result , the award is passed without any order to costs .

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3146.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलय , ईरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 126/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -11011 / 58/ 2004- आईआर ( एम ) ] जोहन टोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3146. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No.126 /2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the

9117

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Air Port Authority of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L - 11011 /58 / 2004 - IR (M ) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM Present : Shri P. L. NORBERT , B.A. , LL B. , Presiding Officer

(Monday the 4th day of October , 2010 / 12th Ashinam 1932)

I. D. No. 126/2006

(I. D. 48/2004 of Industrial Tribunal , Kollam ) Union : The Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram Airport Electrical , Engineering Workers Centre , J.P. Bhavan , Palayam , Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala , Trivandrum. By Adv. Sri . Paulson C. Varghese .

Managements : 1. M/ s . Puliyadyil Service Centre , Ambujavilasom Road , NearGPO, Trivandrum - 695001 . 2.M/ s . Sree Ranga Electricals , Chennai . 3. M/ s Ajantha Electricals and P. A. Equipments , Puthenchanthai , M. G Road , Thiruvananthapuram - 695 001

4. M/ sR. K. Electricals , Chackal , Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram. 5. The Airport Director, Airports Authority of India, International Airports Division , Thiruvananthapuram - 695 008

By Adv. Sri V. Santharam .

This case coming up for hearing on 27-9-2010 , this Tribunal - cum - Labour Court on 4-10-2010 passed the following:

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10 (1 ) ( d) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is :

" Whether the demand of Thiruvananthapuram Airport Electrical Engineering Workers Centre ( HMS), 9118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

J. P. Bhavan , Palayam Thiruvananthapuram Kerala for apponting the 16 workers as per Annexure enclosed who claimed to have worked with the contractors namely M/ s . Puliyadiyil Service Centre , M/ s. Sree Ranga Electricals , M/ s . R. K. Electricals , M/s . Ajantha Electricals and P. A. Equipments in the services of the Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum Airport , Kerala is justified ? If so , to whatrelief the concerned workmen are entitled ? " .

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows :-

The workers' union has espoused the cause of 16 workers in the electrical section of Air Port Authority of India, Thiruvananthapuram Air Port . It is contended by the union that the 16 workers have been working from May 1990 to April 1997 in Airport Authority of India as Generator Operator, A. C. Plant Operator, Electrician etc. Theyhave passed SSLC , 2 year ITI course in various trades including electrical and obtained Wireman Licence issued by Kerala State Electrical Licensing Board . They were discharging duties perennial in nature and were working continuously. The alleged contract is not genuine and it is only a camouflage to deny benefits to labourers . The workers were supervised and controlled by officers of Airport Authority of India . The disciplinary powers were vested with Airport Authority. Though the contractors changed periodically the workers remained the same . In 1997 when the service of 16 workers were terminated by AirportAuthority it was challenged in O. P. before Hon'ble High Court and O. P. was disposed of observing that an industrial dispute can be raised before the appropriate forum . The union contends that the workers are entitled to be reinstated appointed and regularised in service by Airport Authority.

3. Managements 1 to 4 are contractors . They have not contested. The 5th management is Airport Authority of India. They alone filed written statement . It is contended that the dispute is not maintainable as employment of contract labour in the electrical section of Trivandrum Airport is not prohibited or abolished under Section 10 of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970. There is neither appointment nor termination of service by the management . The workers were employed by the contractors. The contract work is not perennial in nature . It is for the first time that the union is raising a contention that the contract is sham . The workers were supervised and controlled by the contractors and not by Airport Authority. The disciplinary action was also vested with contractors . The workers are not entitled either for reinstatement or for absorption.

4. In the light of the above pleadings the following points arise for consideration :

1. Is the dispute maintainable ?

2. Is the contract sham ?

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3. To what reliefs the workers are entitled ?

5. The evidence consists of the oral testimony of WW1 and documentary evidence of Exts . W1 to W4 on the side of the Union and MW1 and Exts . M1 to M - 13 on the side of the management .

6. Point No.1 : It is the contention of the 5th management that employment of contract labour in the electrical section of Trivandrum Airport is not prohibited or abolished under Section 10 of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act and hence the union cannot challenge the contract as sham in view of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India v. National Union Water Front Workers (2001 ) 7 SCC 1-2001-11 - LLJ 1087. The contention is not correct . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has not observed that in all cases notification under Section 10 ( 1 ) of CLRA Act prohibiting employment of contract labour is essential in order to consider the nature of the contract . In para 19 ( 5) it is observed that whether employment of contract labour is abolished or not the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question as to the nature of the contract as genuine or sham . If the contract is found to be not genuine then the employees have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who will have to regularise them in service subjectto conditions as may be specified by the principal employer in the light of sub para 6 of the judgment . Sub para 6 deals with genuine contracts . It is observed that in case of genuine contracts , if contract labour is abolished by notification under Section 10 ( 1 ) of CLRA Act by appropriate government and if the principal employer intends to employ regular workmen , preference shall be given to the erstwhile contract labour , if necessary by relaxing conditions with regard to age , qualifications etc. Therefore unlike contended by the 5th management abolition of the contract labour is not essential in all cases, but only in genuine contracts , for the purpose of claiming absorption. The contention of the union is that the contract is not genunie ( para 5 of claim statement) . In view ofthis contention of the union , even ifcontract labour is not ablished as per CLRA Act the claim for absorption is maintainable .

7. Point No. 2 :- Exts . Ml to M4 are contract agreements for the year 1992 , 1993 , 1994 and 1996. According to the union these are sham contracts with a view to deny benefits to the workers . In fact the workers were treated as employees of the 5th management . They were controlled , supervised and paidby the 5th management . The disciplinary authority was also the 5th management . The electrical operation and maintenance in the electrical section of Trivandrum Airport is essential for the functioning of Airport and the work is perennial in nature .

8. It is relevant in this connection to refer to the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein the test to [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

know the nature of the contract is laid down . In Nilgiri Co- operative Marketing Society Ltd. v. State of T. N. and others (2004) 3 SCC 514 it is held:

" The control test and the organisation test , therefore are not the only factors which can be said to be decisive . With a view to elicit the answer, the court is required to consider several factors which would have a bearing on the result : ( a) who is the appointing authority; ( b ) who is the paymaster; ( c) who can dismiss; ( d) how long alternative service lasts; ( e) the extent of control and supervision; (f) the nature of the job e.g. whether it is professional or skilled work; (g ) nature of establishment; (h) the right to reject" .

9. There is no dispute that the 16 workers in this case were working in electrical section of Trivandrum Airport . The question is whether they were working as contract labour and if so , whether the contract was sham and the 5th management was the real employer. Para 5 ofthe claim statement contains the plea with regard to sham contract . Itisargued by the learned counsel for the 5th management that it is for the first time that such a contention is taken up in the claim statement . In writ petitions filed by the union and several individual workers in 2001 did not contain such a pleading . However the 5th management has not produced a copy of the OP to verify whether the union had a case that the contract was sham . But in the light of the observation of Hon'ble High Court in the judgment (Ext. W4) that an industrial dispute can be raised by the petitioners in the appropriate forum it can be presumed that the union had questioned the genuineness of the contract in OP also .

10. No appointment order or termination order is produced by the union . It is admitted by WW1 , one of the workers that the 16 workers were engaged by contractors 1 to 4 and that there was contract between managements 1 to 4 and 5th management . Naturally there cannot be any appointment order by the 5th management . In para 8 of the claim statement it is averred that the Assistant Executive Engineer of Airport Authority had directed the workers on 15-4-1997 not to report for duty from 16-4-1997 onwards . That means there cannot be any written termination order either. Of course the 5th management does not admit termination of service by them . Their contention is that these workers were working under different contractors during different periods and there is neither appointment nor termination by the 5th management . MW1 the Assistant General Manager (Engineering ) in charge of the electrical division stated that the work of contract employees would have come to an end when period of contract was over. There can be no doubt that operation and maintenance work in the electrical section of the Airport is essential for the functioning of the Airport and therefore the work is perennial in nature. MWI has also admitted in the cross 4734GI/10-15

9119

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

examination (page 5) that the nature of the work is perennial . According to WW1 the workers were supervised by Junior Engineers and Assistant Engineers of Airport Authority and not by contractors . MW1 does not have a consistent version regarding supervision . She said first in the cross examination that the contractors had supervisors and the 5th management's officers used to monitor the work . Subsequently she stated that the work was supervised by Junior Engineer. There is no clarification regarding this aspect in the re - examination . Regarding payments of remuneration WWI says that the workerswere paid by the contractors . Of course MW1 has the same version that the payment was made by the contractors . In view of the admission of WWI regarding payments no records are necessary to find out who was the pay master . No vouchers or recrods regarding payments are called for by the union either. With regard to disciplinary powers WW1 stated that both contractor and Airport Authority have the powers to take disciplinary action. But no instances are pointed out by WW1 . According to the management the power to take disciplinary action is with the contractor .

11. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the union that argeements Exts . M1 to M4 do not cover the entire period from 1991 to 1997 during which the workers were engaged . They relate to the period 1992, 1993 , 1994 and 1996 only . No contract for the period 1991 , 1995 and 1997 are produced . Therefore it is contended that at least during the intervening periods the workers must have been engaged directly by the 5th management and not through contractors . If the argument of the learned counsel isaccepted and if the workers were engaged directly by the 5th management, then definitely the payment must have beenmade by the 5th management to them directly and not through contractors . But WW1 has no such case . He admits that all payments were made by contractors . That apart if during the interregnum if the principal employer made payments to the workers directly it should have been as per either wage slips or vouchers or some other mode . But none of such records are called for by the union. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the management that all agreements relating to the entire period are produced in Ext.M10. But it is not correct . The agreements produced in that case are in respect of the period from 1991 to 1995 only. Even then the agreement for the period 1997 is not before court . However the absence of contractual documents for certain intermittent periods will not by itselfgive rise to a presumption that there is no contract or the contract is sham . From the circumstances it has to be presumed that the workers would have continued as contract workers on the same terms and conditions of previous contract during the interregnum.

12. The management denies employer- employee relationship. The evidence go to show that the 16 workers were engaged by contractors and hence the 5th 9120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

management is not the appointing authority . Since it is admitted by WW1 that payment was made by contractors the 5th management cannot be the pay master . As the appointing authority is the contractor normally the power to take disciplinary action is also with the same authority unless it is shown to be otherwise . Regarding supervision and control there is the evidence of WW1 alone . One of the officers who supervised could have been summoned . MWI has no consistent version with regard to supervision . She said first that monitoring alone was done by officers of 5th management . Thereafter her version was that junior engineer was supervising the workers . Admittedly there is no termination order . The only aspect thatis proved is the perennial nature of work . The remaining facets of a sham contract are not proved by the union .

13. The learned counsel for the union submits that passes issued by 5th management to the workers would prima facie show that they are the employees of 5th management . Ext . Wl series are temporary entry permits issued to the workers and W2 series are temporary passes issued to the workers . Of course they are issued by Airport Authority. But the passes are given to the workers for the purpose of entering into the premises of the Airport which is a security area and none can enter , whether for work or for any other purpose without passes . Even for contract workers passes are essential . Therefore the very fact that passes were issued to the 16 workers during differentperiods will not support their contention that they are employees of 5th management . Ext . W3 series are certificates issued by contractors . They merely show that during the period mentioned in the certificates these workers were engaged by different contractors and they bear good character and conduct . Exts . W3 ( b ) , 3 ( c) and 3 (d) certificates even show that the workers were relieved from their job for want of vacancies . Therefore Ext . W3 series certificates will not come to the help of the workers . On the other hand they support more the case of the management that they were engaged by the contractors and not by 5th management .

14. Ext. W4 is a common judgment in OP 36713/2001 and several other Ops . filed by union and individual workers against Airport Authority, its officers , Assistant Labour Commissioner and Union of India for the purpose ofa direction .

1. to absorb the workers by Airport Authority.

2. to issue notification under Section 10 CLRA Act abolishing employment of contract labour in Electrical Section of Airport , Trivandrum by Appropriate government .

3. to fix wage rates in accordance with CLRA Central Rules .

4. to reinstate the workers who were terminated from service .

[PART II ---SEC . 3 ( ii) ] In para 6 of Ext . W4 judgment it is observed by Hon'ble High Court that the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner ( C) is the competent authority for fixing wage rates . He has after considering the pleading , evidence and hearing union , contractors and Airport Authority, passed Ext.P - 14 orders as prayed for by the union . It is further observed in para 7 that the establishment has engaged more than 20 contract labour and therefore S.1 ( 4) of CLRA Act would apply to the establishment and the order of Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner is in accordance with law and has the jurisdiction to pass such an order ( para 8 ) . With respect to absorption of the workers it is held that the aggrieved parties can approach the industrial adjudicator by raising an industrial dispute . Thus on one hand the union and the workers would claim benefits of CLRA Act and Rules on the ground that the workers are contract labour and on the other hand they would also claim absorption on the premise that there is no genuine contract and they are really the employees of the principal employer . Thus there is no consistent for the union.

15. As per the representation of the union and as per the direction of High Court in Ext . M5 judgment the Regional Director of Employees ' State Insurance Corporation had passed Ext . M7 order holding that the establishment of Airport is not covered by ESI Act , but the contractor's establishments i.e. M/ s . Ajantha Electricals , P. A. Equipments and M/ s . Perkins are covered by ESI Act . Therefore the contractors were directed to comply with the provisions of ESI Act . As per the representation of the union and Ext . M6 judgment of the High Court the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner , Trivandrum passed Ext . M8 order regarding liability to pay PF contributions . It was found by the Commissioner ( page 13 ) that 32 contract workers were engaged by M/ s . Ajantha Electricals , P. A. Equipments and another as per contracts between A. A. I and contractors . In page 20 it is found that M/ s . Ajantha Electricals and P. A. Equipments and M/ s . Perkins were Engineering contractors and they were directed to remit PF dues in respect of the workers for the periods 1996 to 99. Thus Exts . M 7 and M8 also go against the contention of the union that the contract is sham .

16. There was a government notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act regarding employment of contract labour in the Airport , Trivandrum . It was challenged before Delhi High Court in Writ Petition . By Ext . M - 11 judgment the notification was quashed . It was challenged by the 5thmanagement in Writ appeal . By Ext . M - 12 judgment the order of single bench was confirmed and the appeal was dismissed . Therefore there is no notification abolishing contract labour in Trivandrum Airport .

17. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the union that the 16 workers were working for a long time from 1991 to 1997 continuously in a work that is perennial in [भाग-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

nature and it is an unfair labour practice to engage them long without absorbing them . Item 10 Part - 1 of 5th schedule of ID Act referred by the learned counsel for the union is with regard to engagement of workmen as badlis , casuals or temporaries for a long time . But the 16 workers are only contract workers and they are not employees of the 5th management and contract workers do not fall within the definition of workmen under Section 2 (s) of ID Act and therefore they do not come within the meaning of item No. 10 , part - 1 of 5th schedule of ID Act .

In the light of the reasons stated above , I find that the contract is genuine and the workers are not employees of 5th management but of the contractors .

18. Point No. 3 :- In view of the above findings it follows that there is no termination of service by the 5th management . The service of contract workers normally come to an end when the contract period comes to an end . It cannot be termed as termination or retrenchment . Therefore the workers are not entitled for reinstatement , much less for absorption by the 5th management . They are also not entitled for any other relief.

In the result an award is passed finding that the demand of the union , for appointment of 16 workers in the service of Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum Airport is not legal or justified and they are not entitled for any relief.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .

Dictated to the Personal Assistant transcribed and typed by her corrected and passed by me on this the 4th day of October , 2010 .

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

Witness for the Unions

WW1- B. C. Fen Raj , Worker

Witness for the Managements

MWI- J. Sreekumari , Assistant General Manager -Engg . (E) , AAI , Trivandrum .

Exhibits for the Unions

Wlseries Temporary Entry Permits issued by Airport Authority of India .

W2 series . Temporary Passes issued by Airport Authority of India .

W3 series . Certificates issued by contractors .

W4 series . Judgment in OP No. 36713/2001 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala .

9121

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

Exhibits for the Managements

M1 Agreementdt . 25-1-1996 between AAI and M/s . Ajantha Electricals and P. A. Equipments .

M2 Agreementdt . 26-6-1992 between AAI and M/ s. R. K. Electricals .

M3 Agreementdt . 8-10-1993 between AAI and M/ s. Puliyadiyil Service Centre .

M4 Agreementdt . 4-11-1994 between AAI and M/ s . Puliyadiyil Service Centre .

M5 Judgment in OP No. 9015/1999 of Hon'ble High Court, Kerala.

M6 Judgment in OP No. 9123/1999 of Hon'ble High Court , Kerala .

Order of Regional Director of Employees State Insurance Corporation dt . 2-7-1999 . M7

M8 Proceedings of Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Dt . 30-11-1999.

M9 Award in ID 127 and 149/2006 of CGIT - cum- Labour Court , Ernakulam .

M10 Award in ID 151/2006 of CGIT- cum - Labour Court, Ernakulam .

M11 Order of Delhi High Court in CWP 6540/1999 dt. 26-10-1999 .

M12 Order of Delhi High Court in LPA 530/2002 dt . 8-4-2002 .

M13 Record of proceedings of Hon'ble Supreme Courtdt . 31-1-2003 .

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3147. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पोस्ट्स/ इंस्पेक्टर , भण्डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/27/ 2008- आईआर ( डीयू) ] जोहन टोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3147.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Posts / Inspector , Mandi 9122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2010 .

[No. L-40012/27/2008 - IR (DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT -1, CHANDIGARH

Case ID No. 11/2008

Shri Megh Singh S/ o Shri Munshi Ram, Vill . -Motia, Tehsil & Distt.- Mandi , Mandi (HP )

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] The management of the bank appeared and contested the claim of the workman by filing written statement . It is denied that proper and fair opportunity of being heard was not afforded to the workman . It is also contended by the management that Postal Department does not come within the preview ofthe term ' industry ' as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act . It is further more contended by the management of the Posts that the workman was charge- sheeted on two accounts namely:-

( 1 ) On withdrawing the amount of Rs . 1,000 for his own benefit from the saving bank account No. 240283 opened and maintained by Shri Khaniya Ram.

...Applicant

Versus

The Inspector, Post Office , D/ o Post , Mand North Sub- Division, Mandi (HP)

(2) The second charge against the workman was that he has illegally withdrawn Rs . 2000 each on two occasions from the saving bank account 241106 opened and maintained by Smt. Banti Devi and has used the amount for his own benefit without any authority.

...Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

: Shri N. K. Nagar.

: Shri Santosh Kumar.

FortheManagement

AWARD

Passed on :-2-11-2010

Government of India vide notification No. L -40012/ 27/2008 - IR (DU) , Dated 16-2-2009 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act ( the Act in short ) has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

" Whether the action of the management of Department of Posts/Inspector , Post Offices , Mandi in terminating the services of their workman Shri Megh Singh w.e.f. 10-5-2005 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " After receiving the reference parties were informed. Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings .

The case of the workman in nut shell is that without conducting the proper and fair enquiry his services were terminated by the management of the Post Office , Mandi . He was not provided with the documents which were subject matter of the enquiry. Proper opportunity for adducing evidence in defence was not given to him. The enquiry officer has wrongly and illegally relied upon his confessional statement without any proof. Shri Yaspal Singh , Inspector who has conducted the preliminary enquiry was not examined by the enquiry officer and the enquiry officer has wrongly held the charges proved against him. The punishment awarded is not proportionate to the committed misconduct .

With regard to charges , it is contended by the management that on both of the charges adequate and all possible opportunity of being heard was afforded to the workman . The charges were well proved and punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority after affording the opportunity of personal hearing is proportionate to the committed misconduct .

As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, parties were heard on preliminary issue on fairness of enquiry on 24-4-2010 . After hearing on the issue of fairness of enquiry on 24-4-2010 , vide order dated 24-4-2010 enquiry conducted by the enquiry officer was held to be proper, fair and in accordance with the principle ofnatural justice for the reasons shown in the order dated 24-4-2010 . Both of the parties were further afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence on perversity, if any, in decision making of enquiry officer and on quantum of punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority. From order dated 10-8-2010 , it is evidently clear that both of the parties denied to avail this opportunity for adducing evidence on perversity, if any, in decision making of the enquiry officer and on quantum of punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority. Accordingly both of the parties were heard at length and file was reserve for award.

As stated earlier, this Tribunal has already decided the issue on fairness of enquiry in positive , meaning thereby, it has been held by this Tribunal that enquiry was conducted in a fair , proper and reasonable manner . On decision making of the enquiry officer and the quantum of punishment no oral evidence was adduced by the parties [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

and it was contended that documents on record be perused while deciding the above issues . I have gone through the proceedings of the enquiry, enquiry report , order of the disciplinary authority and order of the appellate authority. As stated earlier that the workman was charge - sheeted for fraudulently withdrawing an amount of Rs . 5,000 in three transactions from two saving bank accounts opened and maintained by different persons . The statement of both of the persons who have opened the account were recorded by the enquiry officer and it was proved before the enquiry officer that they have not withdrawn the amount in dispute . Rs . 1,000 was withdrawn on 17-7-2003 from the saving bank account by Khaniya Ram . Shri Khaniya Ram has proved before the enquiry officer that he has not withdrawn the amount . The workman was in position to get the amount by fraudulent means . On the date in question he was working on the same seat so there was an opportunity to him to do the work . Moreover the other witness has also proved that workman was in the position and opportunity was there to do the act of misconduct . Likewise , on two occasions namely 18-7-2003 and 25-7-2003 Rs . 2,000 which were withdrawn from the saving bank of one Smt . Banti Devi by fraudulent thumb impression . The statement of Banti Devi was recorded and the effect of the statement of Smt . Banti Devi and other employees of the bank make it clear that workman was having the opportunity to do the work. The cumulative effect of the entire enquiry proceeding recorded by enquiry officer and the documentary evidence is that chain of circumstances indicates and confirmed that it is the workman who had done the work amounting to misconduct . Thus , there has been no perversity in decision making of the enquiry cil House St officer. usLimite

The act ofwithdrawing the amount from accounts of customers accounts is the major misconduct and as per the nature of the committed misconduct the punishment oftermination from the services in my view is proportionate to the committed misconduct . So there is no perversity in awarding the punishment to the workman . There is no force in the claim of the workman and he is not entitled for any relief. The reference is accordingly answered . Let Central Government be approached for publication of Award , and thereafter , file be consigned to record room .

Chandigarh .

Dated: 2-11-2010

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का. आ: 3148. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट

9123

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/ पौष4 , 1932

बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 247/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -12012/ 293 / 99 - आईआर ( बी-1 ) ]

रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2010 S.O. 31-48 .- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No.247 /99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L- 12012 /293/ 99 - IR (B - I) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case ID No. 247/99

Shri Om Prakash S / o Shri Naib Chand , R/ o VPO Tagood Tehsil Kishtwar , District - Doda ( J & K)

...Applicant

Versus

( 1 ) The Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India, 122-A/ D , Ghandinagar ( J & K) , Jammu - 180004.

(1 ) The Chief General Manager , State Bank of India , Local Head Office , Sector - 17 - B , Chandigarh - 160001 .

.Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Workman : Shri Amit Sharma .

For the Management : Shri S. K. Gupta .

AWARD

Passed on : -4-11-2010

Government of India vide notification No. L - 12012/ 293/99 - IR ( B - I ) , Dated 15-11-99 by exercising its powers under Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act (the Act inshort ) has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of S. B. I. , represented by A.G.M. , S.B.I. , Ghandinagar , Jammun (J & K) and Chief General Manager , State Bank of India , Chandigarh , in not including the name of Shri Om Prakash , Daily Rated workman in the list of 9124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

eligible candidates for appointment as class IV Staff and denying appointment as per settlement dated 17-11-1997 and subsequently terminating his services w.e.f. 28-10-1998 is just and legal . If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

Afterreceiving the reference parties were informed. Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . After joining this Tribunal , a mechanism was adopted for enhancing timely justice . As per the mechanism this industrial dispute was listed for settlement through conciliation mechanism . A settlement took place between the management and the respondent bank which was published in the offieial gazette of the Central Government on 5-9-2008 . The management of the respondent bank moved an application for recalling the award dated 5-9-2008 published in the gazette of the Central Government . The application was dismissedby this Tribunal on 6-3-2009 . The management of the respondent bank preferred a writ petition before Hon'ble the High Court , Chandigarh challenging the award passed on settlement dated 5-9-2008 and order dated 6-3-2009 . The writ petition was disposed off by Hon'ble the High Court vide order dated 27-7-2010 . This Tribunal was directed by Hon'ble the High Court to dispose off the reference afresh after affording the opportunity for adducing evidence to both ofthe parties . Certain conditions were imposed by Hon'ble the High Court . The respondent bank complied with the conditions , accordingly, this Tribunal has afforded all possible opportunities for adducing evidence and hearing to both of the parties .

The evidence of the parties was recorded . Documentary evidence was also preferred to be filed by both of the parties . I have heard the parties at length .

The cumulative effect of the evidence of both of the parties is that workman has worked with the management of the respondent bank in two capacities :

( 1 ) In the capacity of a canteen boy run by the Local Implementation Committee (LIC)

(2) As a casual worker and the payment of wages were made good from petty cash .

The reference referred by the Central Government is not only regarding the nature of the termination but it is also regarding the denial of right of the workman for his appointment as class -IV as per settlement dated 17-11-1997 . No settlement dated 17-11-1997 is on record . The workman has not mentioned even a single sentence about the settlement in his statement of claim . In his evidence he has only mentioned that he does not know the name of the parties in settlement dated 17-11-1997 . He has shown his ignorance whether any settlement dated 17-11- 1997 existed .

Onperusal of the evidence on record , it is evidently clear that in the year 1997 certain vacancies of class IV

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] employee were filled in by the management of the respondent bank . The workman was one of the candidate and appeared in test as per rules . He has admitted in his evidence that initially his name was not sponsored by employment exchange in the year 1990 but his name was sponsored in the year 1997 when he applied for the post .

As stated earlier , the reference referred by the Central Government is not only relating to the benefit of settlement dated 17-11-1997 but is also relating to the illegally of the termination order , if any, passed by the management of the respondent bank . It is not disputed thatworkman was working in two capacities namely in the capacity of a casual worker for which he was directly paid by the management of respondent bank from petty cash and in the capacity of a canteen boy paid by Local Implementation Committee ( LIC ) .

It is settled law of service jurisprudence that a casual worker or a daily waged worker has no right to post . The procedure and rules relating to the public appointment cannot be compromised . Adaily waged worker has the right to continue in services till work exists . If the work is over or a permanent employees have been appointed as per rules , he has no right even to continue the work.

The priority is to be given for regular appointment as per the rules . If the regular appointment as per the rules is made , a daily waged worker cannot claim to be appointed just on the ground that he has worked for a long period as a causal worker/daily waged worker . As stated earlier a daily waged worker or a casual worker has no right to post .

In the year 1997 , the bank appointed more than 100 class - IV employees . Opportunity was afforded to the workman . His name was sponsored by the employment exchange . He was not found fit for the post . Accordingly, his name was not included in the list of selected candidates . The virus of the selection procedure conducted by the management is not the subject matter of this reference . Thus , the reference is answered with the view that this Tribunal cannot directed the management to include the name of the workman in the list of the selected candidates as per the examination conducted in the year 1997 just on the ground that he has continuously worked for a long time as a casual worker . If it is considered it will open a new channel to the public appointment . As stated earlier , public appointments have to be regulated and made strictly as per the rules . The workman was given a chance to appear in the examination but he could not qualify . It is once again made clear that it is not the case of the absorption of the causal worker but it is the case where the regular appointment as per rules were made by the management of respondent bank . The workman was given opportunity but he could not qualify . Thus , he cannot claim [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

for inclusion of his name in the list of the selected candidates on the ground that he has worked for a long time with the management of the respondent bank as a casual worker.

It is true that after the appointment of all the class - IV employees he has further worked with the management bank and his services were terminated much after these appointments . This part whether his termination was illegal has also been referred by the Central Government . It means the legality of termination of the services of the workman on 28-10-1998 has to be considered by this Tribunal . The appointments were made on 17-11-1997 and workman continued to work as a daily waged worker up to 28-10-1998 . Meaning thereby, the workman has worked almost a year as casual worker after making the regular appointments which shows that work for a casual worker was available even after the regular appointments .

The workman was working as casual worker as well as a canteen boy . The canteen boy has no employers and employee relationship with the management of the respondent bank but as a casual worker the workman has the employer and employee relationship with the management of the respondent bank . He was engaged on casual basis by the management of the bank . He was paid wages from the petty cash by the management of the bank . Hewas under the administrative control of the management ofthe respondent bank as a casual worker . Admittedly no notice one month wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation was paid to the workman before terminating his services .

The management of the respondent bank has relied upon certain case laws which are as follows :

( 1) State Bank of India and others versus State Bank of India Centeen Employees Union .

(2) Madhyamik Siksha Parishad versus Anil Kumar Mishra & others , AIR 1994 SC 1638 ,

(3) Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi & others versus State ofBihar & others , 1997 LIC 2075 S.C. , (4) G.M. Thanda Thermal Power Project versus Jai Prakish Srivatava and another , 2008 ( 1 ) SLR 670 SC.

I have gone through the case laws referred and relied upon by the management . In all the case laws the issue of regularization of the services of a daily waged worker has been dealt with , whereas the issue before this Tribunal is regarding the legality of the termination . It is also the settled law of service jurisprudence that services of a daily waged worker and casual worker are protected under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . The Industrial Disputes Act does not bar the termination of a daily waged worker or a casual worker , but it regulates it . The termination of a casual worker or a daily waged worker

9125

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

is regulated in the sense that if the services of the workman are no more required , his services have to be terminated as per the provisions laid down in the Industrial Disputes Act . The Industrial Disputes Act laid down the procedure that in case of non requirement of the services of a daily waged worker or a casual worker , he has to be given a month notice or paid one month wages in lieu of notice along with lawful terminal dues . If it is not done the termination will be illegal and void ab initio . The Industrial Disputes Act protects one more right of the casual worker and daily waged worker that in case of requirement of work the preference shall be given to the retrenchee . In this case the workman has stated that he has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination and his services were terminated without notice or one month wages in lieu of notice and without payment of lawful terminal dues . By filing documents the workman has proved this contention that he has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination as daily waged worker. His services were terminated without notice , one month wages in lieu of notice and without payment of retrenchment compensation which makes his termination illegal and void ab initio.

Whenever, the termination of any workman is declared to be illegal and void , there are two possible remedies available to the workman . The first remedy is reinstatement of the workman into the services on the same position he was initially appointed and working with the bank. The second alternative remedy is a reasonable compensation . It is settled law of service jurisprudence that priority shall be given for reinstatement of services of the workman . It has been held by this Tribunal that initially appointment of the workman cannot be questioned because he has substantially worked with the management in the capacity of a daily waged worker and has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination . Thus , considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the changing trend in service jurisprudence regarding the protection of right to work, I am of the view that reinstatement of the workman on the same position he was working prior to his termination is appropriate remedy . Considering the facts and circumstances of the case workman shall also be entitled for 50% back wages subject to the enhanced rates . The management of the respondent is accordingly directed to reinstate the workman on the same position he was working prior to his termination along with 50% back wages within one month from the date of publication of the award . Accordingly, the reference is answered . Let Central Government be approached for publication of award , and thereafter, file be consigned to record room .

Chandigarh.

Dated: 2-11-10

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 9126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3149. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार उत्तर रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [ सं. एल -41012 /52/2008- आईआर ( बी -1 ) ]

रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2010 S.O. 3149.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( ID No. 42/2009 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court - 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Northern Railway and their workman , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L-41012/ 52 / 2008 - IR ( B - 1 ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH.

Case I. D. No. 42/2009

Shri Randhir Singh S / o Sri Hardev Singh , R/ o Village Gagre , P.O. Mirpur Hans , The Jagraon , Distt . Ludhiana .

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (the Act in short ) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal : -

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Railway, imposing penalty of removal from service on Shri Randhir Singh w.e.f. 17-2-2006 , is justified ? To what relief is the applicant entitled to and from which date ? י

2. After receiving the reference , parties were informed. Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . The main facts of the case in nut shell are that workman was appointed on 06-02-1998 as Diesel cleaner on compensatory ground on account of the death of his father during service in the pay - scale of 2500-3200 per month . The ticket no . of the workman was 951. He was removed from the services on 17-05-2006 on acount of his long unauthorized absence from the services . No proper enquiry was conducted before his termination from the service . He was not afforded the opportunity for personal hearing before awarding the punishment and his appeal wasrejected .

.Applicant

Versus

( 1 ) The Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway , Ferozepur Cantt . ( Pb) Ferozepur .

(2) The Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer Diesel , Northern Railway, Diesel Shed, Ludhiana .

(3 ) The Asstt . Mechanical Engineer Northern Railway, Diesel Shed , Ludhiana .

3. The management appeared and submitted that workman was habitual absentee and he remains unauthorized absent from duty for which he was awarded penalties and punishment number of times . In spite of previous punishments , he did not mend his way . Accordingly , he was issued a charge sheet for his unauthorized absence on 12-07-2005 which was served to the workman on 13-07-2005 . The workman received the same on 16-07-2005 . The workman did not reply within the stipulated period. So the enquiry officer was appointed . During enquiry proceedings , in spite of notice , workman did not turn up till 19-12-2005 . On 19-12-2005 workman appeared and admitted his guilt before enquiry officer in writing vide letter dated 19-12-2005 . The reason for his absence was shown the illness of his wife . As per the contention of the management proper and fair enquiry was conducted . He was also given the opportunity of personal hearing but he did not avail that opportunity . Order of removal from the services was passed by the disciplinary authority on 17-05-2006 . Letter of awarding penalty was send to the workman through registered letter which returned to the management with the postal endorsement ' refused' . Accordingly , the punishment pronounced became affective .

... Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman :

Shri B. N. Sehgal .

Shri N. K. Zakhmi .

For the Management :

AWARD

Passed on 3-11-2010

The Government of India vide notification No. L -41012 / 52 / 2008 - IR ( B- 1 ) , dated 28-05-2009 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 4. Both of the parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence . The workman filed his affidavit and he was cross - examined at length on 13-09-2010. On behalf of the management one shri Manjit Singh file his affidavit and he was cross - examined by learned counsel for the workman . I have heard the parties at length . Learned counsel for the workman has contended that while punishing the workman for unauthorised absent , the previous misconduct and punishment awarded on the previous misconduct cannot guide the disciplinary [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

authority in awarding the punishment for subsequent misconduct . Learned counsel for the workman on this argument has relied upon the law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Indu Bhushan Devadi versus State of Jharkhand 2010 ( 126) FLR 994 ( SC) . The learned counsel for the workman has argued that past adverse record ofthe employee cannot be considered before awarding the punishment without considered the explanation of the employee on previous punishments ..

5. I have gone through the case laws filed and relied upon by the workman which are as follows : -

( 1 ) LIC of India versus R. Suresh, 2008 (2) SCT 664 (SC).

(2) Joginder Lal versus The Presiding Officer , Labour Court -Ambala, 1996 SCT 436 (Pb. & Haryana HighCourt).

( 3 ) Jagdish Singh versus Punjab Engineering College and others 2009 ( 121 ) FLR 984 (SC). (4) Haryana State versus Dharam Pal 2001 ( 1 ) SCT 299 (Pb . & Haryana High Court) .

(5) Mavji C. Lakum versus Central Bank of India 2008 (4) SLR 711 ( SC) .

(6) Inspector Prem Chand versus Govt . of N.C.T. ofDelhi and others 2007 SLR 240 ( SC).

(7) Colour- Chem Ltd. versus A. L. Alaspurkar 1998 (1 ) SCT 757 ( SC) .

(8) Karnail Singh versus The State of Haryana & others 1989 (2) SLR345 (Pb . & Haryana High Court).

(9) Hanuman Singh versus State of Rajasthan & others 1999 ( 1 ) SLR 215 (Raj . ) .

(10) Mysore State and Road Transport Corporation versus Mirja Khasim Ali Beg & Anr. 1977 ( 1 ) SLR 237 (SC).

6. I have also gone through the order and the punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority has awarded the punishment on the basis of the misconduct for which the enquiry was conducted. He has also taken notice for the previous misconduct and punishment awarded . Moreover , it is important to mention that workman while appearing before the enquiry officer admitted his unauthorized absent . Before this Tribunal the workman has also admitted his unauthorized absent . The explanation given by him is that hiswife was not well , she was seriously ill . There is no iota ofevidence on record to prove the ailment of his wife and the treatment given to her. Even there is no evidence to prove that his wife was ill .

7. Thus , there is no proper explanation given by the workman for his unauthorized absent . The workman has admitted for his unauthorized absent .

8. In one ofthe case law filed and relied by learned counsel for the workman , Hon'ble the Apex Court has 4734GI /10-16

9127

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष4 , 1932

defined misconduct . The misconduct has direct nexus with the ill -will and intentional act of the workman . For it, any act of the workman lacks the ill will or intention of the workman, it cannot be said to be the misconduct . Moreover the purpose of disciplinary proceedings and the punishment is to create a work culture and improve the functioning in the workman by way of suggestions . Meaning thereby, the departmental proceedings gives an opportunity to every workmen to mend his way and to do actasper law.

9. Similar nature of misconduct were conducted by the workman on previous occasions . As more as on nine occasions the workman was awarded punishment for the similar nature of misconduct. In Indu Bhushan Devadi versus State of Jharkhand 2010 ( 126) FLR 994 ( SC) relied upon by the workman on the issue that past adverse record of the employee cannot be considered for awarding punishment without considering explanation of the employee, the law is laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in 20, 24-25 of the judgment . On careful reading of entire judicial pronouncement , it is clear that facts of this case altogether are different then the fact of industrial dispute before this Tribunal . In Indu Bhushan case ( surpa ) Hon'ble the Apex Court has held that any confidential adverse remarks on which the employee was not heard , cannot be relied upon for the punishment . However, if the punishment is lesser then purposed it shall be considered that there is no violation of any of principle of natural justice . It is contended by the workman that previous misconduct and previous punishment awarded to the workman cannot be the basis for subsequent misconduct and punishment . On all the nine occasions , punishment was awarded to the workman after affording him the proper opportunity of being heard . The punishment awarded to the workman cannot be compared with unreported adverse confidential remarks.

10. Moreover , workman is a habitual absentee and it is the case of the absenteeism of the workman . As stated earlier, disciplinary authority has passed the punishment order independently, but in my view, judicial conscious can entertained the previous misconduct and previous punishment while awarding the punishment on similar nature of misconduct. The previous misconduct and punishment are based on similar nature of misconduct for which the punishment was given to the workman. On previous similar nature of misconduct, lighter punishment was awarded bythe disciplinary authority but the workman did not mend his way. He continued to commit the similar nature of misconduct and ultimately after conducting a fair and proper enquiry the disciplinary authority awarded the punishment of removal from the services . Whenever a post is created in any department that is for specific work and purpose . On account of unauthorized absent of the workman , the work culture is badly affected and purpose for which the post was created also frustrated. As stated 9128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

earlier, it is the case of the habitual absentee and the disciplinary authority has rightly shown the way out from the department to the workman . In my view there is no occasion for this Tribunal to interfere in the punishment awarded by involving its jurisdiction under section 11 A of the Act . The provisions of section 11A empowers this Tribunal to interfere in punishment awarded sparingly, if the punishment awarded is excessive and it will be miscarriage of justice , if such jurisdiction under section 11A is not invoked . It is not the case in this industrial dispute . Again and again opportunity was given to the workman to mend his way, but he continued to commit the misconduct by unauthorized absent . Accordingly, there is no force in the claim of the workman and he is not entitled for any relief. Let Central Government be approached for publication of award and thereafter , file be consigned to record room.

Chandigarh.

Dated:

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Oficer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3150.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 157/1993 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल -22012/184/1993- आईआर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3150. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No 157/1993 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L - 22012/ 184/ 1993 - IR ( C - II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT / LC/ R/ 157/ 93

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

General Secretary,

Μ.Ρ.Κ.Κ.Μ.Ρ(HMS)

PO Junnardeo ,

Workman/Union Distt . Chhindwara (MP)

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Versus

The Manager, Rakhikol Colliery, PO Rakhikol , Distt . Chhindwara ( MP)

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 10th day of November , 2010 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 22012 / 184/93 - IR ( C - II ) dated 18-8-93 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal : -

"Whether the action of the Management of Rakhikol Colliery of WCL , Kanhan Area , PO Rakhikol , Distt . Chhindwara, in dismissing Shri Dalsingh S/ o Imrat , Trammer from services w.e.f. 03-10-89 is justified ? If not , to what relief the worker is entitled to ?"

2. The case of the Union/ workman in short is that the workman Shri Dalsingh was Trammer at Rakhikol Colliery since 1977. He became patient of T.B. and there- fore he was being victimized by the management . He was not served with any chargesheet and no enquiry was conducted before dismissing him from service w.e.f. 3-10-89 . The principle of natural justice was violated as he was not provided to defend himself. The adivasis were generally prevented to work as there was surplus man power and there was unfair labour practice . The provision ofSection 25 ( T) of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 was violated . On these grounds , it is submitted that the action of the management is not justified and the workman be reinstated with full back wages .

3. The management appeared and filed Written Statement to contest the reference . The case of the management interalia , is that the workman was admittedly Trammer at Rakhikol Colliery but since his appointment he was habitual absentee unauthorisedly without permission and sanction of the Competent Authority. He was chargesheeted on 14-4-89 for his unauthorized absence . Hisattendance in the year 1987 was 133 days , in the year 1988 was 103 days and in the year 1989 only 40 days . His reply was found unsatisfactory and the departmental proceeding was initiated . Shri J. D. Jindal , Dy. Personnel Manager , Kanhan Area was appointed as Enquiry Officer ( in short E.O. ) . The E.O issued notice on 10-7-89 by registered post but he did not appear inspite of the receipt of the notice . When he did not appear in the proceeding , theE.O proceeded exparte on 13-8-89 against the delinquent workman . After enquiry, the E.O submitted enquiry report holding him guilty of the charges of absenteeism . The Disciplinary Authority also found that the proceeding conducted by the E.O was proper and justified and the allegation was proved . The Disciplinary Authority passed the order dated 26-9-89 of punishment of removal from service . It is stated that the principle of natural justice is [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

followed and there is no illegality in the departmental proceeding . The action of the management is said to be justified . The reference be accordingly answered .

4. On the basis of the pleadings of both the parties , the issues are framed : -

I. Whether the enquiry is just , proper and legal ?

II . Whether the management is entitled to lead evidence befor this Tribunal ?

III . Whether the charges of misconduct are proved on the facts of the case ?

IV. Whether the punishment award is proper and legal ?

V. Relief and costs .

5. Issue No. 1 & 2 -

The preliminary issues are taken up by the then Tribunal on 12-4-96 and it is held that the departmental enquiry conducted by the management is fair, proper and legal and direct to argue on the issues No. 3 to 5. Thus these issues are already answered .

6. Issue No. 3-

The Union/workman subsequently became absent and the proceding proceeded exparte against the workman on 18-9-07 on the above three issues . The management adduced evidence in the case . The management has examined Shri K. Raja Prabhakaran in the case who is Sr. Personnel Officer at Rakhikol Colliery. He has supported the case of the management . He has stated that in the year 1987 , the workman was 133 days , in the year 1988 he was 103 days and in the year 1989 he was only 40 days on attendance . He has further stated that he was habitual absentee unauthorisedly without permission . The departmental enquiry papers further corroborates the case of the management on the point of habitual absenteeism of the workman . There is no other evidence in rebuttal of the evidence of the management . There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence on record . Considering the above discussion , it is clear that the charges of misconduct are proved. This issue is decided in favour of the management .

7. Issue No. 4 & 5 -

On the basis of the discussion made above , it is clear that the misconduct is proved against the workman . The learned counsel for the management submits that the seriousness and gravity of the misconduct is proved against the workman and therefore the punishment awarded to him was just and proper. I do not find any reason to interfere in the punishment . I find that the workman is not entitled to any relief. Accordingly these issues are decided and the reference is answered .

9. In the result , the award is passed without any order to costs .

9129

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3151.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 162/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/ 229/1995- आईआर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस . श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2010 S.O. 3151 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No 162/1996) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L - 22012 /229 / 1995 - IR ( C - II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/ LC / R/ 162 / 96

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

The President, Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ( INTUC) , PostNorth Jhagrakhand Colliery, Distt . Surguja ( MP ) Workman / Union Versus

...Management The Chief General Manager , Hasdeo Area of SECL , Post South Jhagrakhand Colliery, Distt . Surguja ( M.P. )

AWARD

Passed on this 11th day of November , 2010 1.The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 22012/ 229/ 95 - IR ( C - II ) dated 21-8-96 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the Sub Area Manager, Bijuri sub Area of SECL , Hasdeo Area in not regularizing 9130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 / PAUSA 4 , 1932

132 workers ( list enclosed ) who perform various jobs at Bijuri Colliery during the year 1993-94 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workmen are entitled ? " 2. The case of the Union/ workman in short is that 132 workmen were engaged at Bijuri Colliery of SECL to perform various jobs during the period on 1993-94 and their attendance was taken at the gate of the mine . The management supervised their work. It is stated that in the year 1993 when the workmen completed 240 days , they demanded regularization in the mine in the year 1994. It is stated that the management had shown that prohibited nature of mine jobs were done by the contractors but infact that was performed under the supervision of the management . It is submitted that the management be directed to regularize 132 workers w.e.f. 1-1-1994 with all benefits .

3. The management appeared and filed Written Statement . The case of the management , interalia , is that the management categorically denied the engagement of 132workers in different jobs in Bijuri mine either directly or through contractors . It is also denied that these 132 claimant workmen were member of the Union . They were never engaged by the management especially in the year 1993. As such the completion of their work for a period of 240 days does not arise. The claim of the applicants workmen is vague , unspecific as far as the period of work, nature of work , number of persons engaged under which contractors . It is stated that there is no merit in the claim of the applicant and therefore the reference be answered in favour of the management .

4. The Union/ workman appeared in the case and filed statement of claim in the reference . Thereafter the Union/workmen became absent . Lastly the then Tribunal proceeded the reference exparte against the Union / Workman on 8-2-2007.

5. On the pleadings of both the parties , the following issues are settled for adjudication :-

I. Whether the 132 workers ever worked in Bijuri Sub Area of SECL, Hasdeo Area ?

II . If so , Whether the action of the management in not regularizing them in the year 1993-94 is legal and justified ?

III . What other relief, if any, the workmen are entitled ?

6. Issue No. I & II

The management has adduced oral and documentary evidence . The management witness Shri M.L. Sahu is Personnel Manager in SECL , Hasdeo Area . He has stated that 132 persons had never been engaged by the management for any type of work in the mining operation atBijuri under ground either directly or through contractors . It is evident that the management has completely denied the engagement of any of these

[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] workmen . The burden is on the Union/ workmen to establish that they had been ever engaged in Bijuri Mine in any nature of work . There is no other evidence in rebuttal of the evidence of the management to establish that they were ever engaged . There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence of the management in absence of any other evidence . I find that presently there is no case of the Union/ workmen . These issues are decided in favour of the management .

7. Issue No. III

Considering the discuession made above , it is clear that the Union/ workmen is not entitled to any relief. Accordingly the reference is answered .

8. In the result , the award is passed without any order to costs .

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 30 नबम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3152 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मेजर डिप्टी असिस्टेंट एडजूडेंट जनरल फॉर कमांडर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , अजमेर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.आई.टी.आर.01 / 06 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -14011 / 9/2005- आईआर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 30th November , 2010 S.O. 3152.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CITR - 01/06) of the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Ajmer as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Major Deputy Assistant Adjutant General for Commander and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 30-11-2010 .

[No. L - 14011 /9 /2005 - IR ( DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

अनुबन्ध

श्रम न्यायालय एवं औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण , अजमेर पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री पवन एन . चन्द्र , आर.एच.जे.एस प्रकरण संख्या- सी.आई.टी.आर. 01/06 रेफरेंस संख्या - एल दिनांक 06-06-06 14011 / 9 / 2005- आई आर( डीयू ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

श्री देवाखान पुत्र श्री उमराव खान चीता मेहरात द्वारा अनुसूचित जाति/जनजात्प्ति महासंघ , धोलाभाटा मेन रोड , अजमेर मृतक बजरिये उसके वारिसान् एवं कानूनी प्रतिनिधि: -

1/1 श्रीमति समीदा धर्मपत्नी स्व. श्री सदेवाखन जाति चीता मेहराल

श्री शाहिद खान सुपुत्र स्व. श्री देवाखान उम्र 15 वर्ष 1/2

श्री अयूब खान सुपुत्र स्व. श्री देवाखान उम्र 12 वर्ष 1/3

श्री शोकत खान सुपुत्र स्व. श्री देवाखान उम्र 10 वर्ष 1/4

श्री शाहजाद खान सुपुत्र स्व. श्री देवाखान उम्र 7 वर्ष 1/5

1/6 श्री शमीन खान सुपुत्र स्व. श्री देवाखान उम्र 4 वर्ष क्र.सं. 2 से 6 नाबालिगन बजरिये अपनी प्राकृतिक माता एव. वली श्रीमति समीदा समस्त जाति चीता ( मेहरात ) के निवासीगण बाडिया देवलाकी डांग ग्राम राजोसी वाया नसीराबाद जिला अजमेर

9131

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

तथा वह दिनांक 31-10-04 से पुनः समस्त परिलाभों के साथ सेवा में बहाल किये जाने योग्य है ।

4. प्रार्थी पक्ष के क्लेम का जवाब देते हुए विपक्षीगण ने यह तो स्वीकार किया है कि प्रार्थी ने जुलाई 2000 से सितंबर 2004 तक 1600 रुपये प्रतिमाह के वेतन पर माली के रूप में अस्थाई तौर पर उनके यहां काम किया है परंतु उनका कथन है कि प्रार्थी का कार्य संतोषजनक नहीं होने से उसे एक माह का नोटिस देकर सेवा से पृथक किया गया है । अतिरिक्त कथन में विपक्षी उन्होंने विभाग को रक्षा मंत्रालय से संबंधित होने के कारण इस पर औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम लागू नहीं होना कहा है और इस स्थिति में उन्होनें प्राथी के क्लेम को खारिज करने की प्रार्थना की है ।

5. प्रार्थी की और से उनकी पत्नी श्रीमती समीदा के बयान लिपिबद्ध कराये गये जबकि विपक्षी पक्ष की ओर से मेजर सुजीत सिंह के बयान लिपिबद्ध कराये गये ।

.... प्रार्थीगण

बनाम

मेजर डिष्ठी असिस्टेंट एङज्युटेंट जनरल हैड क्वा. 340 ( इंडिपेंडेंट ) मैोनाइज्ड बिग्रेड द्वारा -56 , ए. पी. ओ . नसीराबाद

6. मैंने उभयपक्षों के योग्य अधिवक्ताओं की बहस ध्यानपूर्वक सुनी तथा पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध समग्र साक्ष्य का बारीकी से अध्ययन एवं मूल्यांकन किया है ।

7. प्रस्तुत प्रकरण में हमारे समक्ष निम्न महत्वपूर्ण अवधारणीय बिंदु हैं :-

.... अप्राथी

उपस्थिति

प्रार्थी की ओर से : श्री राजेश खन्ना , अधिवक्ता प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी की ओर से : श्री रामस्वरूप , अधिवक्ता - प्रतिनिधि

अवार्ड

दिनांक 27-10-10 1. श्रम विभाग , केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा इस न्यायालय के अधिनिर्णयार्थ निम्न रेफरेंस प्रेषित किया है: -

" Whether the action of the management of Major Deputy Assistant Adjutant General for Commander, Head Quarters 340 ( Independant ) , Mechanised Brigade , C/ o 56 APO , Nasirabad and Commendant Head Quarters 340 (Independent ) Brigade 56 APO in terminating the services of Shri Devakhan S / o Shri Umrav Khan w.e.f. 31-10-2004 is just and legal If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ? " 3. नोटिस के उपरांत उभयपक्ष उपस्थित आये । प्रार्थी कर्मकार की ओर से उसके विधिक प्रतिनिधिगण ने दिनांक 16-10-06 को क्लेम प्रस्तुत कर अंकित किया है कि वह चौदह वर्षों से विषक्षी सं. 1 के अधीन गार्डनर माली के पद पर अस्थाई रूप से कार्यरत था । नियुक्तिके संबंध में उसे कोई लिखित आदेश नहीं दिया गया था । विपक्षी द्वारा दिनांक 29-9-04 को नोटिस देकर उसकी सेवायें समाप्त कर दी । उसका मामला औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 बी , एफ , एन के अंर्तगत पूरी तरह से विचारणीय है और चूंकि उसले एक कैलेंडर वर्ष में 240 दिन से अधिक समय तक नियमित रूप से कार्य किया है , ऐसी स्थिति में उसका सेवा समाप्ति आदेश दिनांक 31-10-04 गलत , अवैध एवं शून्य प्रभावी घोषित किये जाने योग्य है ( 1 ) क्या प्रार्थी के विवाद के संबंध में औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के प्रावधान लागू नही होते हैं ।

( 2 ) क्या मेजर डिपटी डिप्टी असिस्टेंट एडज्यूटेंट जनरल फॉर कमांडेंट हैडक्वार्टर 340 मेकेनाइज्ड ब्रिगेड व कमांडेंट हैडक्वार्टर 340 ब्रिगेड द्वारा प्रार्थी देवाखान को दिनांक 31-10-04 से सेवामुक्त करने का आदेश सद्भाविक एवं विधिक है और यदि नहीं है तो कर्मकार किस राहत को प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी है । 8. उपरोक्त बिंदुओं के संबंध में मेरा निम्न विवेचन एवं निष्कर्ष है : -

9. बिंदु संख्या -1: विपक्षी पक्ष की ओर से इस आशय की विधिक आपत्ति अपने जवाब एवं बहस के दौरान प्रस्तुत की गयी है कि चूंकि प्रार्थी का विवाद आर्मी अधिनियम 1950 के अधीन आता है और उसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 2 घ के अधीन कर्मकार नहीं माना गया है ऐसी स्थिति में श्रम न्यायालय विपक्षीगण के विरुद्ध औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के तहत किसी प्रकार का अवार्ड पारित करने का क्षेत्राधिकार नहीं रखते हैं ।

10. प्रार्थी के योग्य अधिवक्ता से पूछे जाने पर स्वीकार करते हैं कि जिन श्रमिकों का विवाद वायुसेना अधिनियम 1950 , सेना अधिनियम 1950 , एवं नौ सेना अधिनियम 1957 के अधीन आता है उन पर औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 के प्रावधान लागू नहीं होते हैं । 11. मैनें भी औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 2 घ में कर्मकार की परिभाषा का अध्ययन किया है जिसके उपनियम 1 के अंर्तगत ऐसे समस्त व्यक्तियों को औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के तहत कर्मकार होना नहीं माना गया है जिनका विवाद सेना अधिनियमों 1950 के अंर्तगत आता है । 9132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4 , 1932

12. प्रार्थी पक्ष की ओर से जो विवाद उत्पन्न किया जाता है वह रक्षा मंत्रालय के अधीन स्थापित 340 इंडिपेंडेंट मैकेनाइज्ड ब्रिगेड के मेजर डिप्टीअसिस्टेंट एडज्यूटेंट जनरल फॉर कमांडर हैडक्वार्टर के विरूद्ध उत्पन्न किया है । मेरे मत में जब देवाखान ने अपने क्लेम की मद सं.1 में रक्षा मंत्रालय के अधीन कार्यरत होने का कथन अंकित किया है तो निःसंदेह उसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 2 घ में वर्णित कर्मकार की परिभाषा में होना नहीं माना जा सकता है । 13. जब इस प्रकार के विवाद के संबंध में औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के तहत मामले का परीक्षण करने का क्षेत्राधिकार निहित नहीं है तो फिर केंद्र सरकार श्रम मंत्रालय की ओर से यह रेफरेंस किया ही नहीं जाना चाहिये था ।

14. उपरोक्त परिस्थितियों में विपक्षी पक्ष की ओर से प्रस्तुत कानूनी आपत्ति में बल होना प्रतीत होता है कि रेफरेंस किये गये मामले में इस न्यायालय को हस्तक्षेप करने का अधिकार नहीं है । उपरोक्त परिस्थितियों में मैं विवाद के गुणावगुण के संबंध में किसी प्रकार का मत व्यक्त किया जाना न्याय संगत नहीं समझते हुए इस रेफरेंस का उत्तर आगे उल्लिखित अनुसार दिया जाना न्यायोचित प्रतीत होता है ।

-: आदेश- आवर्ड : -

परिणामतः केंद्र सरकार श्रम मंत्रालय की ओर से प्रस्तुत रेफरेंस का उत्तर इस प्रकार से दिया जाता है कि चूंकि तथाकथित कर्मकार श्री देवाखान ने स्वयं को रक्षा मंत्रालय के अधीन नियुक्त होना कहा है तो ऐसे कर्मकार का विवाद सेना अधिनियम 1950 से अभिनिर्धारित किया जा सकता है । इस स्थिति में देवाखान की सेवा समाप्ति के आदेश दिनांक 31-10-04 के गुण- अवगुणों के संबंध में किसी प्रकार का आदेश क्षेत्राधिकार ना होने से नहीं दिया जाता है और कर्मकार इस न्यायालय से इस स्टेज पर कोई राहत पाने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

पवन एन. चन्द्र, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3153. जबकि मैसर्स बी.वी.आई एच . आर. प्रैक्टिस प्रा. लिमिटेड [दिल्ली ( दक्षिण ) क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या डीएल / 28683 के अंतर्गत ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है । 2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की बुसमा में कम हितकर नहीं हैं और कर्मचारी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 09-12-2010 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/26/2010 - एस . एस-11 ]

एस . डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S. O. 3153.- Whereas M/ s BVI HR Practice Private Limited. [under Code No. DL/28683 in Delhi ( South) Region ] (hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause ( a) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 ( 19 of 1952 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government , the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme , 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme ) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time , the Central Government , hereby , exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 09-12-2010 until further notification .

[No. S -35015 /26/ 2010 - SS - IIJ

S. D. XAVIER , Under Sery .

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 3154. जबकि मैसर्स एडिको फ्लेक्सिवन वर्क फोर्स सौल्युशन लि. [ बंगलौर क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या के. एन. / 34272 के अंतर्गत ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है । 2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं हैं और कर्मचारी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 (तस्तामुप्तसन्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 09-12-2010 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस -35015/24/2010 - एस. एस- II ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S. O. 3154.- Whereas M/ s Adecco Flexione Work Force Solution Ltd. [ under Code No. KN / 34272 in Bangalore Region ] ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 ( 19 of 1952 ) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

3. Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time , the Central Government , hereby , exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 09-12-2010 until further notification .

[No. S - 35015 /24/2010 - SS - II ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secry .

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3155.- जबकी मैसर्स मेरिको लिमिटेड [ बांद्रा क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या एमएच/34904 के अंतर्गत ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) ( एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है ।

2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अशंदान दर के मामलें में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं हैं और कर्मचारी समान प्रवृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शतों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के

9133

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

प्रचालन से 01-04-1990 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती हैं ।

[सं. एस-35015/ 27/2010 एस.एस. II ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3155. Whereas M/ s . Marico Ltd. [ under Code No. MH/38904 in Bandra Region) ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 (19 of 1952) ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government , the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' ProvidentFunds Scheme , 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

3. Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time , the Central Government , hereby, exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 01-04-1990 until further notification .

[No.S - 35015 /27 /2010 - S.S. - II ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3156. जबकी मैसर्स गोदरेज एग्रोवेट लिमिटेड [ मुंबई क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या एमएच/ 39045 के अंतर्गत ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) ( एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है ।

2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अशंदान दर के मामलें में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना कम हितकर नहीं हैं और कर्मचारी समान प्रवृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-04-1994 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती हैं ।

[सं. एस -35015/104/ 2009 एस.एस.11 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव 9134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2010 S.O. 3156. Whereas M/ s . Godrej Agrovet Limited [ under Code No. MH/ 39045 in Mumbai Region ] ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause ( a) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 ( 19 of 1952 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government , the rules of the Provident Fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other Provident Fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme , 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time , the Central Government , hereby, exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 1-04-1994 until further notification.

[No. S - 35015 / 104 / 2009 - SS - II ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3157 , कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 1 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबंध जम्मू एवं कश्मीर राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्

1. नगर परिषद् उधमपुर , जिला उधमपुर की नगरपालिका सीमा के अंतर्गत आने वाले समस्त क्षेत्र । 2. सिकॉप औद्योगिक कॉम्पलेक्स , बट्टल बालियाँ, रठियान , जिला उधमपुर की नगरपालिका सीमा के अंतर्गत आने वाले समस्त क्षेत्र ।

[सं. - एस-38013/50/ 2010 - एसएस -1 ] एस . डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3157. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 , 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Jammu and Kashmir namely : - 1. All the areas falling within the Municipal Limits ofthe Municipal Council Udhampur , District Udhampur.

2. All the areas falling within the limits of the SICOP Industrial Complex Battal Ballian , Rathain District Udhampur .

[No. S - 38013 / 50 / 2010 - SS - 1 ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3158, कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 1 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

केन्द्र

बढ़ते हुए निम्नलिखित क्षेत्र/विरुदुनगर जिले के राजस्व गाँव

1. तुलुक्कपट्टी तुलुक्कपट्टी, जिला विरुदुनगर

2. वी. चोक्कलिंगापुरम

3. वचक्कारपट्टी

4. पटअमपुतुर

5. आवडैयापुरम्

6. कोविलवीरारपट्टी

7. इन्डापुली विरुदुनगर तालुक में

8. ई. कुमारलिंगापुरम् विरुदुनगर जिले के सात्तुर तालुक में।

[सं. - एस-38013/ 44/ 2010 - एसएस -1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3158. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

hereby appoints the 1st January , 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely :--

Centre

Areas Comprising the Villages of Revenue

( a) Thalukkapatti Thulukkapatti , Virudhunagar District (b) V. Chokkalingapuram

( c) Vachakkarapatti

(d) Pattamputhur

(e) Avadaiyapuram

(f) Kovilveerarpatti

(g) Endapuli in Virudhunagar Taluk and

(h) E. Kumaralingapuram in Sattur Taluk of Virudhunagar District .

[No. S - 38013 /44/2010 - SS - I ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3159.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 1 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

राजस्व भाग

जिला

हदबस्त संख्या

क्रमांक

झज्जर लोवा खुर्द

[सं. एस-38013/51/ 2010 - एसएस-1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3159.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government 4734Gl /10-17

9135

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25, 2010/पौष 4 , 1932,

hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely : ---

District Sl . No. Revenue Village Had Bast No.

Lowa Khurd

1 .

Jhajjar

[No. S - 38013 / 51 /2011 - SS- 1 ]

S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3160.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा । जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध जम्मू एवं कश्मीर राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

" गांव कंदरोड़ियां , तहसील और जिला रियासी के अंतर्गत आने वाले समस्त क्षेत्र। " [सं. - एस -38013/ 46/2010 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3160. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter - V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Jammu and Kashmir namely :-

"All the areas falling within entire village Kandrorian , Tehsil and District Reasi . "

[No. S - 38013 /46/2010 - SS - I ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

9136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/PAUSA 4, 1932

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3161. - कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

" राजस्व ग्राम - पतरापाली , उर्दुना , कलमी , किसनापुर , खैरपुर , गोरखा , चिराईपानी , टीपाखोल , बरमुड़ा , भगवानपुर , सराईपाली , जिला रायगढ़ की सीमाओं के अन्तर्गत आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र। "

[ सं. एस -38013 /48/ 2010 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14 December , 2010

S.O. 3161. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January , 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except Sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Chhattisgarh namely :---

"All areas falling within the revenue village Patrapali , Urdana , Kalmi , Kishanpur , Kharipur , Gorkha , Chiraipani , Tipakhol , Barmuda , Bhagwanpur , Saraipali , District Raigarh . "

[No.S - 38013/48 /2010 - SS - I ]

S.D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3162 , -कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा । जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात् :

"राजस्व ग्राम- टेडेसरा , सोमनी , जिला राजनांदगांव की सीमाओं के अन्तर्गत आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र। "

[सं. एस-38013 /47/2010 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 14 the December , 2010 S.O. 3162.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter - V and VI [ except Sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Chhattisgarh namely:-

"All areas falling within the revenue village Tedesara , Somani , District Rajnandgaon . "

[No.S - 38013 /47/2010 - SS - I ]

S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3163.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 01 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

" तराईमाल- आमापाली , गेरवानी , देलारी , दनौट , पाली , लामीदरहा , शिवपुरी , छिंदभौना , बड़माल , भैंसगढ़ी , गोरखामुडा, आमाघाट , पुजींपथरा , गौरमुड़ी , उजलपुर , सराईपाली , जिला रायगढ़ की सीमाओं के अन्तर्गत आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र। "

[सं. एस -38013/49/2010 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3163. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- Vand VI [ except Sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Chhattisgarh namely :---

"All areas falling within the revenue village Taraimal , Aamapali , Gerwani , Delari , Danaut, Pali , Lamidraha , Shivpuri , Chhindbhona , Badmal , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Bhainsgadhi , Gorkhamuda , Aamaghat , Punjipathra , Gourmudi , Ujalpur , Saraipali , District Raigarh."

[No.S - 38013 /49/2010 - SS - I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3164.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 01 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबंध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

केन्द्र

निम्न क्षेत्र के

अन्तर्गत आने वाले

राजस्व गाँव

(क) शोलावरम शोलावरम , तिरुवल्लूर जिला

में पोन्नेरी तालुक

(ख) ओरक्काडु गांव

(ग ) सेंबुलिवलम

(घ) सिरुनियम

[सं. - एस-38013/52/ 2010 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3164. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI ( except Sub -Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely :-

Centre

Areas Compri- sing the Revenue Villages of

Sholavaram , Ponneri (a) Sholavaram Taluk in Tiruvallur District

(b) Orakkadu Village,

(d).Sirunium

[No.S - 38013 /52 /2010- SS - I ]

S.D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

9137

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010 /पौष 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3165.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 1 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबंध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

केन्द्र

निम्न क्षेत्र के अन्तर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गाँव कांचीपुरम जिला के ,

(क) कुन्तूर

(ख) बरणीपुदूर कुन्ड्तूर व मांगाडू,

श्रीपेरुम्पुदूर तालुक

(ग ) सिक्करायपुरम

(घ) कोवूर

(ङ) माांकडु

(च) तण्डलम

[सं. - एस -38013/45/2010 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3165. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January , 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI [ except Sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely : ---

Centre

Areas Compri- sing the Reve- nue Villages of Kundrathur and Mangadu ( a) Kundrathur Sriperumbudur Taluk (b) Baraniputhur Kancheepuram District (c) Chikarayapuram

(d) Kovur

(e) Mangadu

(f) Thandalam

[No. S - 38013 /45/2010 - SS - I ]

S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

9138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010 /PAUSA 4 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 3166.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्द्वारा 1 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

केन्द्र

निम्न क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वालै सजस्व मांय कडलूर जिला के नेवेली ( क ) नेवेली

[सं. - एस-38013/42/2010 - एस.एस. - 1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010 S.O. 3166. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January , 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78 , 79 , 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely : ---

Areas Centre

Comprising the Revenue Villagesof

(a) Neyveli Neyveli Cuddalore District

[No. S- 38013 / 42 /2010 - S.S. - I ]

S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2010 का. आ. 3167.- औद्योगिक अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल 15025 /1 / 2010 - अ.ई आर ( एम ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 29th November , 2010 S.O. 3167.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No 72/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Employees State Insurance Corporation and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2010 .

[No. L - 15025 / 1 /2010 - IR( M) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer

Dated the 30th day of August , 2010 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No.72/2007 BETWEEN:

Smt . Chavati Ramu , W/ o Chavati Adinarayana , R/ o Indiranagar Colony , Near Srikanya Theater , Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam .

.. Petitioner AND

1. The Manager , Employees State Insurance Corporation , R/o at D. No. 9-29-14 , Balajinagar , Visakhapatnam.

2. The Regional Director , Employees State Insurance Corporation , D. No. 5-9-23 , Hill Fort Road , Hyderabad - 500 063 .

Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner :

M/ s . L. Madhusudhan Rao , Ch.T.V.S. Murthy & V. Satyanarayana , Advocates

Sri William Bura , Advocate For de Respondent :

AWARD

This petition under Sec . 2 A ( 2 ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 was filed by Smt . Chavati Ramu , ex . Employee of Employees State Insurance Corporation in light of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others challenging her termination by the management .

2. Petitioner submitted that she initially joined in the Respondent organization as a sweeper during 1995 . Though she worked for about 10 years her services were not regularized . Petitioner used to draw a salary of Rs . 150 per month and she used to put her thumb impression being illiterate . During April , 2005 , one Mr. Suryanarayana , Head Clerk and Mr. Karunanidhi , Manager of Respondent No.1 organization started harassing the Petitioner mentally and physically and thereafter she was not allowed to perform her duties on which she represented vide representation dated 11-4-2005 to the District Collector . She was abused by above mentioned officials by taking her caste name 'Mala' when she went to Respondent No. I's office on 12-4-2005 where she was beaten by them in the office room due to which she sustained injuries . She lodged complaint at III Town Police Station and she was sent for medical treatment . That Petitioner issued lawyer's notice dated 5-9-2005 for which received reply dated 3-10-2005 with false and fictitious contents . Petitioner work woman prayed this court to direct the management to reinstate her service with back wages and continuity of service .

3. Counter statement was filed by the Respondent No.1 and 2. It is submitted by the Respondents that petition filed against Respondent No. 2 is not maintainable . That Petitioner was a contingent employee working for less than an hour per day on payment of Rs.150 to 250 per month . In this connection the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and other Vs. Uma Devi and other AIR 2006 SC . 1806 (2006 ) 4 SCC - 1 2006 - II , LLJ - 722 has held that there can not be any case for regularization without there being employee employer relationship . It is submitted that Petitioner services were terminated on expiry of contract employment on 31-3-2005. That she was engaged as part time sweeper cum water carrier on periodical basis from 8-4-1999 but not from 1995. She was paid on vouchers as contingent charges but not as salary . The contract came to an end on 31-3-2005 accordingly she was ceased to be part time sweeper cum water carrier from 1-4-2005 . Aggrieved with non - renewal of contract , Petitioner used abusive language against the Respondent No.1 and complained to District Collector , Visakhapatnam and III Town Police Station , Visakhapatnam . It is submitted that Ist Respondent never abused her by naming her ' caste ' etc. , and the officer being Tamil speaking officer is not in a position to understand Telugu , leave alone using an abusive language about her caste . Petitioner is not entitled for reinstatement or any relief as she is not covered under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

4. Both parties were directed to adduce their respective evidence . Petitioner workman filed her affidavit

9139

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

as WWI and affidavit of Smt . D. Lalitha as WW2 and presented herself and Smt D. Lalitha for cross examination . Respondent also produced documentary evidence material Ex . Ml to M18 and filed affidavit of Sri M. V. Suryanarayana , Assistant in the office of Employees State Insurance Corporation Visakhapatnam he appeared for cross examination but none appeared to cross examine the management witness , thus , the cross examination was forfeited and evidence was closed .

5. On the date of argument Petitioner or his counsel were absent . Counsel for the Respondent appeared and argued on behalf of the Respondent .

6. I have heard the argument of Learned Counsel for the Respondent and gone through claim statement , counter statement and oral evidence of the Petitioner and oral and documentary evidence of Respondent.

7. It has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that it was agreed case of the parties that workman ofthis case was engaged as part time sweeperess for a definite period in Respondent organization. Her last engagement was made from 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2005 , on a fixed pay of Rs . 250 per month . She was engaged on the basis of contract for a specific purpose and specific period . Since the period of last engagement expired on 31-3-2005 she was not engaged for further period as such , it can not be said that her services were terminated or she was dismissed without following any procedure . More over , the Petitioner of this case is not a workman within the meaning of Sec . 2 ( o ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. She was engaged on contract basis and she was a contract labourer , as such , she can not claim reinstatement or for regularization of her services .

8. I have considered this argument , this tribunal has to determine the following points :

(I) Whether the disengagement of Smt . Chavati Ramu amounts to unfair labour practice ?

( II) Whether she is entitled for engagement or for reinstatement in the service?

9. Point Nos . ( I) & ( II) : Both these points are interrelated as such , they are being disposed off together . The Petitioner's contention is that she was appointed in the year 1995 at Dondaparthy, for a salary of Rs . 150 per month which was enhanced to Rs . 450 per month but on papers her salary was shown as Rs . 250 per month . She has further claimed that the office premises was shifted from Dondaparthy to Balajinagar, Visakhapatnam and she continued to serve for more than 10 years . She worked for full time, she requested for regularization but her services were terminated from 1-4-2005. She filed affidavit in support ofher above contention . In her cross examination she was asked whether she worked under a written order from April , 1999 or March , 2000 or not to which she has denied .

9140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 25 , 2010/ PAUSA 4 , 1932

[PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 30thday ofAugust , 2010 .

VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent

WWI : Smt. Chavati Ramu MWI : Sri M - V- Suryanarayana .

WW 2 : Smt. Damaraju Lalitha

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. WI : Copy of representation to District Collector

Ex. W2: Copy of complaint given at III Town Police Station

Ex . W3 : Copy of lawyer's notice dated 5-9-2005

Ex. W4: Copy of reply to Ex . W3 dated 3-10-2005

Ex. W5 : Copy of FIR dated 12-5-2005

Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex . M1 : Copy of appointment letter of dated 2-4-96 of Statement V. Aruna Devi .

Ex. M2 : Copy of appointment letter of Smt . V. Aruna Kumari dated 1-4-98

Ex. M3: Copy of appointment letter dated 3-4-99 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex . M4 : Copy of appointment letter dated 25-4-2000 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex . M5 : Copy of appointment letter dated 16-4-2001 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex. M6 Copy of appointment letter dated 10-7-2001 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex . M7 : Copy of appointment letter dated 12-4-2002 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex . M8 : Copy of appointment letter dated 4-4-2003 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex. M9 : Copy of letter No. 52- A/ 11 /21 / 2001-E- III dated 10-6-2003

Ex. M10 : Copy of appointment letter dated 5-4-2004 addressed to the Petitioner

Ex . M11 : Copy of acknowledgement for the complaint lodged at office of District Collector, Visakhapatnam

Ex. M12 : Office copy of the complaint mentioned in Ex.M11 by WWI dated 26-4-2005 However , the Respondent management has filed engagement orders vide Ex . Ml dated 2-4-1996 by which one Smt . V. Aruna Devi was engaged as part time sweeperess w.e.f. 1-4-96 at Rs.250 per month . The management has filed another paper Ex . M2 dated 1.4.98 that one Smt . V. Aruna Kumari was appointed as part time sweeperess to work from 1-4-98 to 31-3-99 and the present work woman Smt . S. Ramu was engaged as part time sweeperess w.e.f. 8-4-99 to 31-3-2000 vide order dated 8-4-99 as Ex . M3 . This prove that present Petitioner was not working in any capacity in the management organization in the year 1995 as claimed by her . But she was engaged as part time sweeperess for first time on 8-4-99 for and upto 31-3-2000 . Thereafter she was re- engaged vide office order dated 25-4-2000 to work as part time sweeperess from 1-4-2000 to 31-3-2001 and like wise she was engaged for the year 2002 , 2003 , 2004 and lastly from 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2005 on monthly remuneration of Rs. 250 per month as part time sweeperess . The Petitioner workman has denied that she was engaged through any written letter. However, the management has filed written orders in the form of Ex . Ml to M8 to prove that Petitioner work woman was engaged on year to year basis and her services were terminated at the end of financial year. She was only part time sweeperess as such , her allegation that sheworked for full time is neither factual nor based on any material fact or documents produced by Petitioner workman . From the documents produced by the Respondent it is clear that Petitioner has made complaint againstthe management that she was beaten and abused on 12-4-2005 and made a complaint to the District Collector and the Police that she was beaten by Respondent management and their clerk Sri Suryanarayana. Document produced by Respondent prove that the engagement of the Petitioner was not renewed on 1-4-2005 , hence , she made the complaint . The Respondent witness has proved these documents through his affidavit , he appeared for cross examination , but the witness of the management was not cross examined by concerned workman . Hence , the affidavit filed on behalf of the Respondent management has remained uncontraverted . This amply proves that the Petitioner workman was engaged as part time sweeperess upto 31-3-2005 and her services were not renewed after 31-3-2005 after her term of service expired , she was not terminated from the service by the management . Since the terni of service expired on 31-3-2005 , Petitioner workman was not entitled to claim reengagement or fresh engagement because her services were neither in permanent nature nor of temporary nature . She has not been able to prove that there was any permanent vacancy of sweeperess - cum - water man as such, non- renewal of her service from 1-4-2005 is neither unfair labour practice nor it is against the provisions of Industrial DisputesAct, 1947. She is not entitled for reinstatement or re- appointment. Point No.1 and II decided accordingly. Hence , this award .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Ex . M13 : Office copy of reply to Ex . W12 dated 26-4-2005 Ex. M14 : Office copy of Ir No- 52 - A/ 11 / 21 /96 - VSP dated 26-4-2005

Ex. M15 : Office copy of Ir No - 52 - A / 11 / 21 / 96 - VSP dated 16-5-2005

Ex . M16 : Office copy of Ir No - 52 - A/ 11 / 21 / 96 - VSP dated 9-9-2005

Ex. M17: Office copy of Ir No - 52 - A/ 11 / 21 / 96 - VSP dated 7-10-2005

Ex . M18 : Office copy of reply to legal notice of WWI dated 3-10-2005

(खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशालय ) धनबाद , 13 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 3168. - मैं , सतीश पुरी , मुख्य खान निरीक्षक जिन्हें खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशक के रूप में भी पदनामित किया गया है , दिनांक 15-11-2009 को भारत के राजपत्र के सब- सेक्शन 2 सेक्शन 3 , भाग 2 , में प्रकाशित दिनांक 6-11-2009 (एस -29022/ 1/2009- सामान्य/3423 ) के का. आ. सं. 3177 के आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए एतद्वारा मध्य प्रदेश के सिंगरौली जिला को वाराणसी क्षेत्र के अन्तर्गत मिलाए जाने की घोषणा करता हूं, जिसके संदर्भ में खान अधिनियम , 1952 की धारा 5 की उप - धारा 1 के तहत नियुक्त निरीक्षक अपनी शक्तियों का इस्तेमाल करेंगे , जो

9141

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 25 , 2010/पौष 4 , 1932

उपरोक्त संदर्भित अधिसूचना में टाइपोग्राफिकल त्रुटि के कारण वंचित रह गया था।

[ सं. एस-29022/ 1/2009 - सामान्य/ 3008] सतीश पुरी , मुख्य खाम निरीक्षक एवं खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशक (Directorate General of Mines Safety) Dhanbad , the 13th December , 2010 S. O. 3168.-I , Satish Puri , Chief Inspector ofMines and also designated as Director - General of Mines Safety, under the powers conferred on me under sub- section 3 of Section 6 of the Mines Act , 1952 , in partial modification of S.O.No. 3177 dated 6-11-2009 ( S- 29022 / 1 / 2009 - Genl/ 3423 ) , published in Part - II , Section 3 , Sub - section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated 15-11-2009 , hereby declare inclusion of Singrauli District of the State ofMadhya Pradesh in the area of jurisdiction of Varanasi Region , with respect to which Inspectors appointed under Sub- section 1 of Section 5 of Mines Act , 1952 , shall exercise their respective powers , which had erroneously been left due to typographical error , in the above referred notification .

[No. S - 29022 /1 /2009 -Genl/ 3008 ] SATISH PURI , Chief Inspector of Mines & Director General ofMines Safety Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .