This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

+23 20 23

रजिस्टी सं. डी. एल. (एन. ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारतको राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 9 जनवरी 15, 2011 , शनिवार पौष 19 पौय 25, 1992

सं. 3 ]

NEW DELHI , SATURDAY, JANUARY 9 JANUARY 15, 2811 /PAUSA 19-PAUSA25, 182 No.3 ]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि

SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that

भाग ।। खण्ड

PART II Section 3

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंशलय को छोड़कर ) द्वा गती किए गए ।

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries ofthe Governm (Other than the Ministry of Defence).

कृषिमंत्रीलाय

(कृषि एवं सहकारिता विभाष )

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 136. मारियल विकास बोर्ड अधिनियम, 1979 ( 1979, का.5 ) की भारा 19 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते सरकार एत‌द्वारा नारियल विकास बोर्ड नियमावली, 1951 में आगे संगोइत करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है, नामतः 1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों को बारियल विकास बोर्ड ( संशोधन ) नियम, 2010 काय जायेगा ।

( 2 ) ये नियम राजपत्र में प्रकाशन तारीख से प्रवृत्त होग

2. नारियल विकास बोर्ड नियम , 1981 में

(i ) नियम 11 के तहत उप नियम (2 ) के लिये निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापित किया जायेगा, नासतः

" ( 2 ) यदि उपाध्यक्ष के पद पर त्यागपत्र या उसकी सदस्यता समाप्त होने के रिक्तिं होती है , तो बोर्ड अपनी बैठक में अपने सदस्यों में से उपाध्यक्ष बारह माह की पूर्ण अवधि के लिये या बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में अपने बने रहेगा । "

(333)

3G1/11 334

[PART -SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011/PAUSA 25 , 1932

(ii ) नियम. 16 के तहत उप-नियम ( 2 ) में खण्ड ( क ) के लिये निम्नलिखित खण्ड प्रतिस्थापित किया जायेगा , नामतः:-

" (क) अध्यक्ष समूह " ग" पदों पर नियुक्ति कर सकता है । "

[फा. सं. 4-29/2007- बागवानी -11 ] संजीव चोपड़ा, संयुक्त सचिव टिप्पणी : प्रधान निम्तवली माया के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उप- खण्ड (1 ) सा.का.नि. 34 ( अ ) दिनांक 28 जनवरी , 1981 के तहत पवमशित की गई थी तथा तत्पश्चात् इसमें 13 फरवरी , 2002 की अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 198 ( अ) तथा दिनांक 19 अप्रैल , 2002 १३ अधिसूचना सं. को आ. 450 (अ) के तहत संशोधन किये गये थे ।

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

(Department ofAgriculture and Cooperation)

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2010

S.O. 136. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 19 of the Coconut Development Board, Act , 1979 (5 of1979), the Cei trai Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Coconut Development Board Rules, 1981 , namely

1.(1) These tules may be called the Coconut Development Board (Amendment) Rules , 2010 .

(2)They shall come into force from the date oftheir publication in the Official Gazette .

2.IntheCoconut Development Board Rules , 1981 : -

(1) In rule 11, for sub-rule (2) , the following shall be substituted , namely :-

"(2) If a casual vacancy occurs in the office ofthe Vice - Chairman on account of resignation or his ceasing to be a meraber or otherwise , the Board shall , at its next meeting , elect another member to be the Vice- Chairman from amongst its members who shall hold office for the full term oftwelve months or till the expiry ofhis term a member of the Board, whichever is earlier. "

(ii) In rule 16, in sub- rule (2) , for clause ( a), the following clause shall be substituted , namely

"(a) The Charnan may make appoints to group " C" posts " .

[F. No. 4-29/2007 -Horticulture - 11 ]

SANJEEV CHOPRA, Jt . Secy.

Note The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3 , Sub- section (i ) vide number G.S.R. 34 (E ), datedthe 28th January, 1981 and subsequently amended by Notification number S.O. 198 (E) , dated the 13th February, 2002 and notification S.O. 450 (E), dated the 19th April, 2002.

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

( स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 137. केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् के परामर्श से मान्यता प्रदान करने वाले विश्वविद्यालय के नाम में परिवर्तन के कारण उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में आगे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः :-

2. उक्तप्रथम अनुसूची में " बंगलौर विश्वविद्यालय, कर्नाटक " और उसमें प्रविष्टियों के बाद " बी एल डी ई विश्वविद्यालय , बीजापुर " जोड़ा जाएगा और " मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता" शीर्षक के अंतर्गत " बी एल डी ई विश्वविद्यालय " यहां इसके बाद [ कॉलम ( 2 ) में ] " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षिप्त रूप" शिर्षक के अंतर्गत उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि यहां इसके बाद [ कॉलम (3 ) में ] के सामने निम्नलिखित को अन्तर्निष्ट किया जाएगा, नामतः [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

(2)

"एनेस्थेसिया में डिप्लोमा"

"बाल स्वास्थ्यमें डिप्लोमा"

" नैदानिक पैथेलॉजी में डिप्लोमा"

" प्रसूति विज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा " " अस्थिरोग मेंडिप्लोमा"

" ओटो- रिनो-लैरिंगोलॉजी में डिप्लोमा"

"डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान ) " " डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( चर्म रोग , रतिज तथा कुष्ठ रोग ) " " डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( जनरल मेडिसिन) "

"डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( माइक्रो बायोलॉजी ),"

"डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( बाल रोग विज्ञान ) "

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (पैथोलॉजी) "

"डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( फिजियोलॉजी) "

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सामाजिक एवं निवारक मेडिसिन सामुदायिक मेडिसिन) "

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन/मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी (एनाटोमी)" " डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( प्रसूति विज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान ) "

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ईएनटी)"

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( जनरल सर्जरी ) "

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी (अस्थिरोग विज्ञान ) "

335

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

(3) .

डी ए

डीसीएच

डीसीपी

डीजी ओ

डी आर्थों

डीएल ओ

एमडी (संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान )

एमडी(डीवीएल )

एमडी ( जनरल मेडिसिन )

एमडी (माइक्रो बायोलॉजी )

एमडी (बाल रोग विज्ञान )

एमडी ( मैथोलॉजी)

एमडी(फिजियोलॉजी)

एमडी ( एसपीएम/समुदाय )

एमडी/एमएस ( एनाटोमी )

एमडी/एमएस ( ओबीजी )

एमएस ( ईएनटी)

एमएस ( जनरल सर्जरी )

एमएस (अस्थिरोग विज्ञान )

( श्री बी एम पाटिल मेडिकल कालेज , बीजापुर में दाखिला लिए छात्रों की बाबत बी एल डी ई विश्वविद्यालय , बीजापुर, कर्नाटक द्वारा फरवरी , 2008 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई चिकित्सा अर्हता मान्यताप्राप्त होगी ) ।

[फा. सं. यू-12012/174/2010 - एमई ( पी-11 ) ।

अनीता त्रिपाठी, अबर सचिव,

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(DepartmentofHealth and FamilyWelfare)

NewDelhi , the 22ndNovember, 2010

S.O. 137. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by subisection (2) of the Section 11 ofthe Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), theCentral Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , due to chănge in name of affiliating University namely:-

In the said First Schedule after " Bangalore University, Karnataka" and entries thereto " BLDE University, Bijapur " shall be added and against " BLDE University " under the heading 'Recognised Medical Qualification' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], and entry relating thereto under the heading Abbreviation for Registration' [ hereinafter referred to as column (3) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:-- 33

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15,2011 / PAUSA 25 , 1932

(2)

"Diploma in Anaesthesia".

"Diploma in Child Health "

"Diploma in Clinical Pathology "

"Diploma in Obstetrics and Gynaecology " "Diploma in Orthopaedics "

"Diploma in Oto- Rhino- Laryngology "

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Anaesthesiology ) " "Doctor of Medicine ( Dermatology, Venerology and Leprosy) "Doctor ofMedicine ( Genereal Medicine)" "Doctor ofMedicine ( Microbiology ) "

"Doctor ofMedicine (Paediatrics ) '

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Pathology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Physiology ) "

[ PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (3)

D.A.

D.C.H.

D.C.P.

D.G.O.

D. Ortho

D.L.O.

MD (Anaestivesiology)

MD(DVL.)

MD (General Medicine )

MD (Microbiology)

MD (Pacdiatrics)

MD (Pathology)

MD (Physiology)

"Doctor of Medicine ( Social and Preventive Medicine / Community Medicine) " MD ( S.P.M.Community Medicine) "Doctor ofMedicine /Master of Surgery (Anatomy) "Doctor ofMedicine/ Master of Surgery (Obstetrics and Gynaecology) "

"Master ofSurgery( ENT) "

"Master of Surgery (General Surgery ) "

" Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics ) " .

MD/MS )

MD/MS (ORG)

MS( ENT)

MS (General Surgery)

MS ( Orthopaedics)

(These shall be recognised medical qualification when granted by " BLDE University, Bijapur , Karnataka " in respect of students admitted at Shri B. M. Patil Medical College , Bijapur on or after February, 2008 ).

[No. U - 12012/174/2010- ME ( P - II ) ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secу.

नई दिल्ली , 1 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आर. 138 भारतीय विकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् के परामर्श करके सम्बद्ध विश्वविद्यालय के नाम में परिवर्तन के कारण उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, नामतः

2. उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " छत्रपति साहु जी महाराज चिकित्सा विश्वविद्यालय , लखनऊ " और " संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद " की प्रविष्टि के बाद जोया जाएगा तयाओया जाएगा तथा मान्यतावित चिकित्सा अर्हता शीर्षक के अंतर्गत " संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद " ( कॉलम 2 के रूप में संदर्शित ) के सामने पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षिप्त रूप कॉलम ( 3 के रूप में संदर्भित ) के शीर्षक के अंतर्गत उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित को अन्दर्विष्ट किया जाएगा, नामतः

(2)

" डिप्लोमा इन चालक हेल्थ

(3)

डीसीएच

(यह जून , 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद संतोष मेडिकल कालेज , गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी) । [भाग II-खंड़ 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

(2)

(3)

हीजीओ

"डिप्लोमा इन आब्सट्रेटिक्स एंड गाइनिकोलॉजी"

(यह मई, 2009 में अथवा उसके बायोमेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजिणवाद में अशिक्षित किए रहे के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाविस द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यकिअर्हता होगी) ।

डीओ

"डिप्लोमा इन ऑफ्थैल्मालॉजी"

(यह मई , 2009 में अभया उसके बाद तो मेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय, रविनाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर भान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अहंता होगी)।

डीआर्थो

"डिप्लोमा इन औरथोपेडिक्स"

(यह मई , 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद कॉलेज, गाज़ियतम्यद में प्रतिषित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थिों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वরि টাক स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्षा अहंता होगी) ।

"डिप्लोमा इन ओटो- रहिनो-लेरिनगोलोजी"

डीएलमों

(यह मई, 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद तो मेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा महत होगी)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (एनेस्थीसियोलोजी)"

एम डी ( एनेस्थीसियोलोजी )

(यह जून , 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद संतोष मेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने, पर मान्याप्राप्त चिकित्सार आहेत होगी)।

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (जनरल मेडिसिन) "

एम डी (जनरल मेडिसिन)

(यह मई, 2009 में अर्थना के बाद समेत मेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विवर्षिचे के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय स्वीकृत किए जाने पर प्यारापिकतम अर्हत्य होगी) । द्वारा

एम डी ( पेडियाट्रिक्स )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (पेडियाट्रिक्स)"

(यह जून, 2007 में अथवा उसके बाद संजन मेडिकल कॉलेम, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए करके निर्मि के संबंध में संतोष नि 338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

[PART IFSEC. 3 (ii ) ] (2)

(3)

स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी) ।

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी (ऑफ्थैल्मोलॉजी) "

एमडी/एमएस ( ऑफ्थैल्मोलॉजी )

(यह जून , 2008 में अथवा उसके बाद संतोष मेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी) ।

' मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ईएनटी )"

एमएस ( ईएनटी )

(यह मई, 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद संतोष मेडिकल कॉलेज , गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी) ।

" मास्टरऑफ सर्जरी ( जनरल सर्जरी) "

एम एस ( जनरल सर्जरी )

(यह जुलाई, 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद संतोष मेडिकल कॉलेज, गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( आर्थोपेडिक्स ) !!

एम एस ( आर्थोपेडिक्स)

( यह मई , 2009 में अथवा उसके बाद संतोष मेडिकल कॉलेज , गाजियाबाद में प्रशिक्षित किये जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में संतोष विश्वविद्यालय , गाजियाबाद द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी) ।

[सं. यू-12012/ 181/2010--एमई ( पी- II ) ]

अनीता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 1st December, 2010

S.O.138. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of1956) , the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, due to change in name of affiliating University namely

In the said First Schedule after " Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow " and entries thereto "Santosh University, Ghaziabad " shall be added and against " Santosh University, Ghaziabad " under the heading " Recognised Medical Qualification" [horeinafter referred to as column (2) ] , and entry relating thereto under the heading " Abbreviation forRegistration" (hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted , namely :-

339 [भाग. H-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: रानवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

(3)

(2)

DCH

"Diploma in Child Health"

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College , Ghaziabed on or after June,2009.

DGO

"Diploma in Obstetrics and Gynaecology "

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when grantedby Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on or after May,2009.

"Diploma in Ophthalmology "

This shall be a recognised modical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on or after May,2009.

D.Ortho.

"Diploma in Orthopaedics"

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on or after May,2009.

DLO

"Diploma in Oto- rhino-laryngology "

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College , Ghaziabad on or after May,2009.

MD (Anaesthesiology)

"Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesiology) "

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on or after June,2009.

"Doctor ofMedicine (General Medicine)"

MD(General Medicine).

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santok University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on of fa May,2009.

340

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

(2)

(3)

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Paediatrics) "

MD (General Medicine)

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at ' Santosh Medical College , Ghaziabad on or after June,2007.

MD/MS ( Ophthalmology ) "Doctor ofMedicine/Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) "

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College , Ghaziabad on or after May,2008.

"Master ofSurgery (ENT) "

MS(ENT)

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University , Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College , Ghaziabad on or after May,2009.

"Master ofSurgery ( General Surgery )"

MS (General Surgery)

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on or after July,2009.

"Master ofSurgely (Orthopaedics) "

MS (Orthopaedics )

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Santosh University, Ghaziabad in respect of students being trained at Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad on or after May,2009.

[No. U - 12012/ 181 /2010-ME ( P- 11 ) ]

ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 139. भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् के परामर्श , करके सम्बद्ध विश्वविद्यालय के नाम में परिवर्तन के कारण उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली " के सामने " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता " ( जोकि आगे कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित है ) के अन्तर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [जोकि आगे कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित है ] के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित को अन्तर्विष्ट किया जायेगा , नामतः:-

[ भाग 11-खंड 3( ii ) ]

341 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौब 25, 1932

(2)

(3),

"डिप्लोमा इन डरमेटोलॉजी , बेनेरोलोजी एंड लेप्रोसी "

डीडी वी एल

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी षी इंस्ट्च्यूिट, सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरू गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय, दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अहंता होगी) ।

"डिप्लोमा इन एनेस्थीसिया"

डीए

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इस्ट्रिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरू गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

"डिप्लोमा इन चाइल्ड हेल्थ"

डीसी एच

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्ट्च्यूिट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल; नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरू गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय, दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

डीजी ओ

"डिप्लोमा इन ओब्सट्रेटिक्स ऐंड गायनाकोलोजी"

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्ट्च्यूिट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरू गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय, दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

डीओ

"डिप्लोमा इन आफ्थलमोलॉजी""

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्ट्च्यूिट, सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरू गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अहंता होगी ) ।

डी एल ओ

"डिप्लोमा इन ओटो- रिहिनो, लेरिनगोलोजी"

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 सेवर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्ट्च्यूिट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल, नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरू गोविन्द, सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , 3G/11-2 342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 / PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (2)

(3)

दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्पा चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) 1

"डिप्लोमा इन फिजिकल मेडिसिन एंड रिहेबीलीटेशन "

डीपी एम आर

( यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों को संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्य। चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" मजिस्ट्रार चिरूरगे ( प्लास्टिक सर्जरी ) "

एम सी एच (प्लास्टिक सर्जरी )

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इस्टिच्यूट, सफदरजंग अस्पताल नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियें वं संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

एम डी ( एनेस्थीसियोलॉजी )

"डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( एनेस्थीसियोलॉजी ) "

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट, सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय, दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

डॉक्टरऑफ मेडिसिन ( जनरल मेडिसिन ) "

एम डी ( जनरल मेडिसिन)

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकलः कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

एम डी ( पेडियाट्रिक्स)

'डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (पेडियाट्रिक्स ) "

( यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट, सफदरजंग अस्पताल . नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" हॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (रेडियो डायग्नोसिस रेडियोलॉजी ) "

एम डी ( रेडियो डायगनोसिस/रेडियोलॉजी )

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल, 343 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 20 1 /पौष 25 , 1932

(3)

नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( रेडियोथेरैपी ) "

एम डी (रेडियोथेरैपी )

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा. रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( आब्सट्रेटिक्स एंड गायनाकोलॉजी ) ". एम डी/एम एस ( ओबी जी )

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन / मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ऑफ्थालमोलोजी ) "

एम डी/एम एस ( ऑफ्थाल्मोलोजी)

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।..

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ई एन टी ) "

एम एस ( ई एन टी )

( यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल, नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय ,. दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( जनरल सर्जरी ) "

एम एस ( जनरल सर्जरी )

(यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( आर्थोपेडिक्स ) "

एम एस ( आर्थोपेडिक्स)

( यह शैक्षणिक सत्र 2008 से वर्धमान महावीर मेडिकल कॉलेज एंड पी जी इंस्टिच्यूट , सफदरजंग अस्पताल , 344

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

(2)

(3)

नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में गुरु गोविन्द सिंह इन्द्रप्रस्थ विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा स्वीकृत किए जाने पर भान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी ) ।

[सं. यू-12012/ 183/2010 -एम ई ( पी-11 ) ] अनीता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14th December, 2010

S.O. 139. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section (2) of the Section 11 ofthe Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , due to change in name of affiliating University namely:-

In the said First Schedule against " Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi " and entries thereto under the heading"Recognised Medical Qualification " [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , and entry relating thereto under the heading"Abbreviation for Registration " (hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:-- (2)

(3)

DDVL

"Diploma in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy"

(This shali de a recognised medical qualification when granted by Gura Gobind Singh ladraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

"Diploma in Anaesthesia"

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG institute, Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008) .

DCH

"Diploma in Child Health"

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

DGO

'Diploma in Obstetrics and Gynaecology"

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, 345 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

(3)

(2)

Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG. Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

"Diploma in Ophthalmology "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic- session 2008)

DLO

"Diploma in Oto - Rhino- Laryngology "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect ofstudents being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

DPMR

"Diploma in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session™ 2008).

M. Ch (Plastic Surgery) "Magistrar Chirurgae ( Plastic Surgery) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

MD ( Anaesthesiology) "Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesiology) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

346

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) | (2)

(3)

"Doctor ofMedicine (General Medicine) "

MD (GeneralMedicine)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute; Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

"Doctor of Medicine ( Paediatrics) "

MD(Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru . Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

"Doctor of Medicine (Radio-diagnosis/Radiology) "

MD (Radiodiagnosis/Radiology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University , Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute, Safdarjung Hospital . New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

"Doctor of Medicine (Radiotherapy) "

MD (Radiotherapy)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute, Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

MD/MS(OBG)

"Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery (Obstetrics and Gynaecology) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

"Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) "

MD/MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained 347 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

(3)

(2)

at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute, Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

MS (ENT)

"Master of Surgery ( ENT) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

MS (General Surgery)

"Master of Surgery ( General Surgery ) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru , Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute, Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

MS (Orthopaedics)

"Master of Surgery ( Orthopaedics ) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi in respect of students being trained at Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and PG Institute , Safdarjung Hospital , New Delhi from the academic session 2008).

No. U- 12012/ 183 /2010- ME (P - II ) | ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 1 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 140.-केन्द्र सरकार , दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16. ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करके, उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग 1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः :-

2. महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक द्वारा प्रदान की जा रही दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों को मान्यता देने के बारे में दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 59 के सामने कॉलमे 2 तथा 3 की मौजूद प्रविष्टियों में इसके पश्चात् निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियों को अंतर्विष्ट किया जाएगा :-

" XXIII . स्वर्गीय दादा साहेब कालमेघ स्मृति डेंटले महाविद्यालय और अस्पताल , नागपुर

बी डी एस , महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक । "

(i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक ( यदि दिनांक 19-6-2010 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई ) ।

[फा. सं. वी. - 12017/30/2005 - डी ई । अनीता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932.

New Delhi , the 1st December, 2010

S.O. 140. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. In the existing entries of columns 2 and 3 against Serial No. 59 , in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

"XXIII . Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital , Nagpur

BDS , Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik ."

Bachelor ofDental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 19-6-2010)

[F. No. V- 12017/30/2005 -DE ]

ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 141. केन्द्र सरकार , दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करके , उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग 1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली द्वारा प्रदान की जा रही दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों को मान्यता देने के बारे में दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1943 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में मौलाना आजाद दंत चिकित्सा विज्ञान संस्थान , नई दिल्ली के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 27 के III के सामने कॉलम 2 तथा 3 की मौजूद प्रविष्टियों में इसके पश्चात् निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियों को अंतर्विष्ट किया जाएगा :

" कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री एंड इंडोडोंटिक्स

एम डी एस ( कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री ) , दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय , दिल्ली । "

( यदि दिनांक 26-5-2010 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई) ।

[फा. सं. वी. - 12017 / 119 /2005 -डी ई ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd December , 2010

S.O. 141. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India , hereby, makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

2. In the existing entries of columns 2 and 3 against III of Serial No. 27 , in respect of Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences , New Delhi , in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by the University of Delhi , Delhi , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

MDS( Cons. Dent .) University ofDelhi , Delhi . "

"Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (ifgranted on or after 26-5-2010)

[F. No. V- 12017 / 119/2005 -DE| ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 142. केन्द्र सरकार , दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करके , उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग । में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. गुजरात विश्वविद्यालय , अहमदाबाद , गुजरात द्वारा प्रदान की जा रही दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों को मान्यता देने के बारे में दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 19 के सामने कॉलम 2 तथा 3 की मौजूद प्रविष्टियों में इसके पश्चात् निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियों को अंतर्विष्ट किया जाएगा :-

[भाग -खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

"IV. दंत चिकित्सा विज्ञान महाविद्यालय और अनुसंधान केंद्र, मणिपुर, अहमदाबाद

बीडी एस, गुजरात विश्वविद्यालय, दान , गुजरात"

दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक ( यदि दिनांक 10-8-2010 को या उसके बाद प्रदरात की गई)।

-12017 /27/2005- New Delhi , the 7th Dekember,2010

S.O. 142. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government , after consultation with the Dimal Counell of badle, Nereux mains the following amendments in Part -I of the Schedule to the saidAct, amely

2. In the existing entries of columns 2 and 3 against Serial No. 19, in Part- I ofthe Bohe (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Gujarat University, Alen entries shall be inserted thereunder the Dentists Act , 1948 Pontein, the following "IV. College ofDental Sciences and Research Centre, Manipur,Ahmedabad

Gujan

Bachelor ofDental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 10-8-2010)

[F. No.V-12017/27 /2005- DE ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy

नईदिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2010

का.आ. 143.-केन्द्र सरकार, दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. अन्नामलाई विश्वविद्यालय , अन्नामलाई नगर द्वारा प्रकार की सीदनिकिता विशिया अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग । में क्रम संख्या 24 के सामने कॉलम तथ राज मुथैया डेंटल कॉलेज एंड होस्पिटल, अन्नामलाई जगर, तमिलनाडु की चार में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टिमी

"प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स

एम. डी. एस. (प्रोल्यो. ) , अन्नामलाई विविधत

अभापलाई नगर । "

(यदिदिनांक 11-4-1994 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई) ।

(फा सं. वी.-12017/6/ 2005-डी ई ( खंड-1 ) ]

अनीता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December 2010

S.O. 143.In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section (2) of Sotion 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part -i of the Schedule to the said Act, hamely

2. In the existing entries ofcolumn 2 and 3 against Serial No. 24 , in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, the following entries in respect ofRajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Annamalai Nagar , Tamil Nadu, shall be insnited thereunder:

MDS ( Prostho .) Annamalai University Anuarmalai Nagar

"Prosthodontics. (ifgrantedon or after 11-4-1994)

IF . No. V- 12017/6 /2005 -DECOLI) 3GV11-3

ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Sony 350

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 23, 1932-

उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाর্শ )

नई दिल्ली , 11 अक्तूबर , 2010 :

कर.आ. 144. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधीन हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मौडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तैथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखोगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;..

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए नैसर्स मालक्ष्मी संग एक भीतर 5 भोपा रोड, नई मंडी, मुजफ्फरनगर ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) नाले " जी ई डब्लू " जला के अकफ सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रानिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " बी. इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडेल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 42 समनुदेशित किया गया है . एस.टेक"है(मिले इसमें इस

उक्त मॉवल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम अमत 50 टन है और न्यूनतम मिता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका गत प्रविरात व्यवशात्मक भारित आयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड (एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 कोल्ट और 30 हर्ट्ज प्रापानी भारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

1888888

आकृति -२ मॉडल के इंडीकेटर का सीलिंग प्रावधान

डिस्पले की बॉडी में से श्रीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्मले के पीछे सीलिंग की जाती है । डिस्पले की बैंक प्लेट में बने छिद्र से सीलिंग को नोड़ा गया है, तब सील के साथ जुड़े हुए दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीसवार डायग्राम पर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल ब्रिनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान भी लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम समता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10के, 5 × 10के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के. समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 (43 )/2010 ] [ भागः 11-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

351 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOODAND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION ,

(Department ofConsumerAffairs)

New Delhi, the 11th October , 2010-

8.O. 144. -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights' and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasureMeasures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained useuse and to render accurate serviçe under varied conditjans;

Now, therefore, in exereise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge ) with digital indication of modlum accuracy (Accuracy Class - IH ) ofseries " BEW " and , with brand name " B. S. TECH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by. M/ s Balaji Weighing and Engineering, 85 , Bhopa Road, New Mandi , Mujaffar Nagar (UP) and which is assigned the approval mark PND/09/ 10/42 The said model is a strain gauge type load coll based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridgo ) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (c) is 5kg. It has a tavo device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The LED Display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model (Weighbridge)

Fig.2- Seating provision of the indicator ofthe model

Sealing is done on the back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by hale in back plate of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above,

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by Sub-section ( 12) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5tonne and upto 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for 'o ' value 5g or above and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 , or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (43)2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 352

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART II-SBC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम्बर, 2010

का.मा. 145- केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वाराद्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह संमाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मोडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखखेपा और विभिन्न परिणादियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब अब केन्द्रीय सरकार दस्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( ४ ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए। मैसर्स इशा स्केल्य आई एन सी. ए. न्यू चामू नगर, पुलियाकुलम रोड , कोयम्बतूर-641037 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) बाले " आई ए "ए " श्रृंखलामुंखला कोके अथक सूचन्न सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इयता " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके परमाद उल मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई. एन. डी. /09/10 / 111 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती

उक्त मॉडल एक इलेक्ट्रों मेग्नेटिक फोर्स कम्पनशेसन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 ग्रा. हैं और न्यूनतम क्षमता । ग्रा है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलगारमेक चारित आपेक्तुलन प्रभाव है । वी. एफ. डी. प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । ।

आकृति-1

SEALING PO

आकृति-2 : मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्कोल के राइट साइड में अपर कवर और बॉटम प्लेट मेंमें बनाए गए छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सिलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया हैहै ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार इक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र को अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिज़ाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधि कतम क्षमता बाले है, और "ई""ई " मान 1। ×× 10क,10 के, 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है.।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 91 )/2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौत्र 25, 1932

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2010

S.O.145.Whereas the Central Governanent , after considering the report submitted to it by proswibed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the pront the Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Mentures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and so rende accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) andand((8 ) of Section 36 of the said Central Government hereby approves and issues the certificate of approval of the model of non-isut instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of specialspecial accuracy (Accurney Class-1) ofsales " list name " Ishtaa " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), menjafactured by M/s . Ishtme Scales Inc. 48/40A, New Dhante Nagar , Puliyakulam Road, Coimbatore-641037. Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mak IND/ 09/10/11 The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle non automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of2000 g. and minimum capacity of 1 g. TheThe verification scale interval ( c ) is 10 mg. It has a tare, device with a100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The V.F.D. display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

1000

SEALING AUнт

Figure-2 : Sealing Provisions

The sealing is done by passing the sealing wire through the holes made on the upper cover and breast pics in the right side of the scale. Sealing shall be done to prevent opening ofthe weighing machine for fraudulent practice. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above . :

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Subsection ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Gouem ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthef the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kgto 50 kg .with verification scale Interval (n ) kt the range of50,000 or above for ' e' value of 1 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 , or 5 × 10 , whore k is appaltive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the sitne principle , design and materials with which , the said approved modelhas been manufactured.

[E. No. WM-21 (91 )2010)

B.N. DIXIT, Director ofLegel Matrology 354

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

नई दिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 146. केन्द्रीय सरकारका विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे पी गई मामृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखोगा और विभिन्न परितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अम क्रोमेट्रीय सरकार , करत कामिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इम्पेक्स कॉरपोरेशन, एस. नं. 74 - जीनगर पंकस्ट्रियल एरिया , कानपुर ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता- II ) वाले " आई टी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकसूचन अहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इम्पेक्स " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/241 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है । '

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृतु येणार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. प्रा. और म्यूनता 100 ग्रा. हैं । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक पारित आवेदन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

Leadseal

StampingPlate

IMPEX

आकृति -2: मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बॉडी में से सीलिंग कायर निकाल कर डिस्पले के राइट साइड बैंक साइड में सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और हॉप कवर में बने दी जोड़ों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है , मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररुपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी चौलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन को एत प्रमाणपत्र के अंवर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मोडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे । 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान भी लिए 100 से 1,00,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 1,00,000 तक की रेंज में सत्त्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " माम 1 × 10㎡, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10को, के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 146) /2010 ] बी, एन. दीक्षित, निदेशके, विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

355 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष-25, 1932

NewDelhi , the 14thi December , 2010

S.O. 146. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights, and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy Class- II) of series " ITS " and with brand name " IMPEX" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Impex Corporation , 8, No. 7, 4-B, Dada Nagar Industrial Area, Kanpur (U.P. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/241 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load ceil based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type) with a maximum capacity of30 kg and minimumcapacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 2 g. It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

Figure-2 : Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing is done on the right side/back side ofthe display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by hole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two koles mached with seal .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D cand/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by Sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the CentralGovern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 1,00,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with Verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of5,000 to 1,08,000 for ' e'valvalue of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 210 , or 5 x 10%, where k is positive or negativewholowtather orequal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No.WM- 21 ( 146)2010) [PART II SEC . 3 (ii )| 356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 : 2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

नई दिल्ली, 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 147. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इम्पेक्स कारपोरेशन, एन. नं. 7 , 4-की, दादा नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , कानपुर ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता- III ) वाले " आई पी एस " खिला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इम्पेक्स" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त पॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/242 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जरी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. प्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 480 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक पारित आश्रेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

Stamping plate

Stamping Plate

Lead seal

Load soul

Sealingwiru

Platform Scale-Front Side)

fIndicator of the platform Scale Lower back Side)

अगदति 2 स्ॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की सॉडी में से सीलिंग कावर निकाल कर डिस्पले के राइट साइड बैंक साइड में सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप काबर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील को जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपभोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्का मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गाय है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक को " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5,000 कि. ग्रा. तका की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ईमान 1 × 10के, 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के सम्तुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 146)/2010]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

357 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2010

S.O. 147.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformitywith the provisions of the Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III) of series " IPS " and with brand name " IMPEX" (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufacturedby M/s Impex Corporation , S. No. 7, 4-B, Dada Nagar Industrial Area, Kanpur ( U.P. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/242.

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and minimum capacity of 400 g. The verification scale interval (e) is20 g. It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

Stamping plate

Stamping Plate

Lead anel

0000

APEX

Lead seal

Sealing

hndicator of the Platform Scale-Front Side)

findicator of the pltform Scale Lower back Bida)

Figure-2: Schematic Diagram of sealing provisión of the model

Sealing is done on the right side/back, side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body ofthe display. The seal is connected by hole in base plate and top cover ofdisplay, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the mode) is given above. :

The instrumenthas external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12 ) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model, shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5 g er more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2x 10%, or 5 × 10t, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 146)/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 3GI/11-4 358

[PART II-SEC.3 (ii ) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

नईदिल्ली , 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 148.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साई इंटरप्राइजिज , एस. नं. 5 , हिमागिरी वैली अपार्टमेंट , एस एम पी मॉडल स्कूल हैदरसाकोट के पास , राजेन्द्रनगर ( एम ) , हैदराबाद-500008 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिलकॉन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/460 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रभाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकर । 2.30 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति-2 : मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बॉडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग' की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील को जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,00,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई" माम के लिए 5,000 से 1,00,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10के , 5 × 10के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 280 ) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 359 [ भाग H-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

New Delhi , the 14th December , 2010

S.O. 148. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the 'Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy Class- II ) ofseries " SJ " and with brand name "SILCON" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Sai Enterprises , S. No. 5 , Himagiri Valley Apartment , Near SMP Model School Hydershakot , Rajendranagar (M ), Hyderabad - 500008 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/460,

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type )with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display, indicates the weighing result. The. instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1-

0000

Figure- 2 : Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display , then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 1,00,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to. 50 mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5,000 to 1,00,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 , or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21. ( 280 )/20101 .

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15,2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

नई दिल्ली 14 दिसम्बर , 2019

का.आ. 149. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साई इंटरप्राइजिज, एस. नं. 5 , हिभागिरी वैली अपार्टमेंट, एसएमपी मॉडल स्कूल हैदरसाकोट के पास, राजेन्द्रनगर ( एम ) , हैदराबाद-500008 द्वार विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-111 ) वाले " एसटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिलकॉन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/461 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेख प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आर्थयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति 1

0000

आकृति 2 : मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बॉडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

1 और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदन शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलनं उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मिग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 3 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं. और " ई" मान 1 × 10के , 2 × 10के , 5 × 10के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

(फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 280) /2010 ] बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 361 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932.

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2010

S.O. 149.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards ofWeights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

1 Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy Class- III ) of series " ST" and with brand name " SILCON " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sai Enterprises , S. No. 5 , Himagiri ValleyApartment , Near SMP Model School Hydershakot , Rajendranagar (M) , Hyderabad -500008 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /9/ 10/461 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure 1

Figure 2 : Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display, The seal is connected by hole is base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided an A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by Sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale. interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10,2 × 10k or 5 × 10* , where k is a positive or negativewhole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , désign and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (280)/2010 )

B.N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 362

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

नई दिल्ली 14 दिसम्बर , 2010

का.आ. 150.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माय भानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स साई इंटरप्राइजिज , एस.नं. 5 , हिमागिरी वैली अपार्टमेंट , एसएमपी मॉडल स्कूल , हैदरसाकोट के पास , राजेन्द्रनगर ( एम ) , हैदराबाद -500008 द्वारा विनिर्मित माध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिलकॉन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/462 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति -1

आकृति-2 : मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बॉडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग बाबर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के, 2 × 10 के , या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।"

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 280 ) /2010 ]

बी.एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 363 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 14th December, 2010

S.O. 150.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) ofseries " SP " and with brand name " SILCON " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s Sai Enterprises, S. No. 5, Himagiri Valley Apartment, Near SMP Model School Hydershakot, Rajendranagar ( M ) , Hyderabad - 500008 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/462 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of4 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

Stapippal

Figure- 2 : Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole is base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferredby Sub - section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5,000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of. 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 x 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (280)/2010]

B.N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नईदिल्ली, 22 नवम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 151. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे 20 अगस्त, 2010 से रद्द कर दिये गये हैं ।

अनुसूची क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों) संख्या की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उप-खंड ( ii ) में का.आ. संख्या और तिथि प्रकाशित 2

1 आईएस/आईएसओ 14041 : 1998 पर्यावरण प्रबंध-जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन- लक्ष्य एवं विषय क्षेत्र की परिभाषा तथा सामग्री-सूची विश्लेषण

2 आईएसओ 14042: 2000 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन-जीवन , चक्र मूल्यांकन-जीवन चंक्र प्रभाव मूल्यांकन

3 आईएसओ 14043 : 2000

पर्यावरण प्रबंधन जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन- जीवन चक्र प्रतिपादन

टिप्पणी

रसायन विभाग परिषद् की पिछली बैठक जो कि 20 अगस्त, 2010 को हुई थी में इस मानक को वापस लेने का फैसला लिया गया था । यह मानक निम्न मानकों द्वारा प्रतिस्थापि किया गया है :

(क) आई एस ओ 14040 2006 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन- जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन- सिद्धांत एवं आधारभूत कार्य और

(ख) आई एस ओ 14044 2006 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन-जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन-अपेक्षा और दिशा निर्देश

रसायन विभाग परिषद् की पिछली बैठक जो कि 20 अगस्त, 2010 को हुई थी में इस मानक को वापस लेने का फैसला लिया गया था । यह मानक निम्न मानकों द्वारा प्रतिस्थापित किया गया है :

(क) आई एस ओ 14040 2006 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन-जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन- सिद्धांत एवं आधारभूत कार्य और

( ख) आई एस ओ 14044 2006 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन- जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन-अपेक्षा और दिशा निर्देश

(क) आई एस ओ 14040 2006 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन- सिद्धांत एवं आधारभूत कार्य और

(ख) आई एस ओ 14044 2006 पर्यावरण प्रबंधन-जीवन चक्र मूल्यांकन- अपेक्षा और दिशा निर्देश

[संदर्भ : सीएचडी 34/ आईएस/ आईएसओ 14041 , 14042 और 14043 ] ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन ) [भाग II-खंड ( ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25, 1932,

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi, the 22nd November , 2010

S.O. 151.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub-rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7ofthe Bureau of Indian Standard Rules, 1987, It is hereby notifiedthat the Indian Standards , particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule given hereafter , have been cancelled and stand withdrawn w.e.f. 20thAugust, 2010.

SCHEDULE

Remarks

S.O. No. & Date

Sl. No. & Year of the Indian No. Standards Cancelled

published in the

Gazette of India, Part- II, Section-3 ,

Sub-section( ii)

(1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

CHDC at its last meeting held on 20 August, 2010 had decided to Withdraw 15/150 14041 : 1998 as this Standard has been replaced by :

1. IS/ISO 14041 : 1998 Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment- Goaland Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis

(a) 190 14040 : 2006 Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Frame- work

and

(b) ISO 14044 : 2006 Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment-Requirement and Guidelines.

2. IS/ISO 14042: 2000

CHDC at its last meeting held on 20th August, 2010 had decided to Withdraw IS/ISO 14041 : 1998 as this Standard has been replaced by:

Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment- LifeCycle

Impact Assessment

(a) ISO 14040 : 2006 Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Frame work

and

(b) ISO 14044 : 2006 Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment-Requirement and Guide- lines.

CHDC at its last meeting held on 20 August, 2010 had decided to Withdraw IS/ISO 14041 : 1998 as this Standard has been replaced by:

3. ÍS/ISO 14043: 2000 Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment- Life Cycle Interpretation.......

(a) ISO 14040 : 2006 Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment -Principles and Frame- work

arid

(b ) ISO 14044 : 2006 Environmental Management Lif Cycle Assessment- Requirement and Guide lines

GI /11-5

[Ref.:CHD 34/IS/ISO 14041 , 14042814043] E. DEVENDAR, Scientist F & Herd (Chemical) 366

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम्बर , 2010

ब्यूरो नियम 1987 केनियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक अनुसूपी में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापिततिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन संख्या नं. 2 ,

एस 4263-1967 तोरीन के लिए सुरक्षा सहिता

31अक्तूबर , 2010

अक्तूबर 2010

केलिए सुरक्षा संहिता

31अक्तूबर , 2010

संशोधन संख्या नं. 1, अक्तूबर 2010

31अक्तूबर, 2010 सुरक्षा के लिए विकंनिर्देश

संशोधन संख्या नं. 1, अक्तूबर 2010

134-10

-सुरक्षा संहिता

31अक्तूबर , 2010

संशोधन संख्या नं. 2 , अक्तूबर 2010

31 अक्तूबर , 2010 एस 13447 : 1992 त्रि- चांदीएनालाइन-सुरक्षा संहिता

संशोधन संख्या नं. 2 , अक्तूबर 2010

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतिया भारतीय मानक ब्यूरों , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों, नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीग नई मुम्वई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बटूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पूने तथा विरूव नन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

दिनांक : 3 मर्षचर , 2010 )

[संदर्भ : सीएचडी 08/आईएस 4263 , आई एस 4264 ]

ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

NewDelhi , the 22nd November, 2010

S.O. 152. In pursuance of clause (b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto amexedmmexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl. No. and year of the bedian Standards

No. and year of the amendment

No..

Date from which the amendment shall haveeffect

4 2

Amendment No. 2

31.October, 2010 1. IS 4263 : 1967 Code of Safety for Chlorine.

October, 2010

31October,2010 2. IS4264: 1967 Code of Safety for Caustic Soda.

Amendment No. 1 October, 2010

Amendment No. 1

31October, 2010 3. IS 5983: 1980 Specification for Eye- protectors

October, 2010

(First Revision)

31October, 2010 4. IS 13440: 1992 Methyl Chloride-Code ofSafety

AmendmentNo. 2 October, 2010

Amendment No. 2

31October,2010 SIS 13447 : 1992 -Nitroaniline-Code of Safety.

October,2010

Copy ofthese Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur hah Zafar Mary New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौम 25 , 1932

BranchOffices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaypur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

FRef: CHD 784

E. DEVENDAR, Scientist Fa

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 153. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को) में संशोधन किया गया/किये

अनुसू

तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

2, अक्तूबर , 2011)

1. आई एस 8144: 1997 बहुप्रयोजी शुष्क बैटरियां- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

-110002 इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मामक भवन, १ , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, तेवर , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में विक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक

New Delhi, the 24th November, 2010

S.O. 153.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of Sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standard Kules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. and year of the Indian Standards

Date fi

No.& year of the amendment

No.

2October,2010-

16-11-2010 1. IS 8144: 1997 Multipurpose DryBatteries- Specification (First Revision )

CopyofthisAmendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Babadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and ant Branch Offices :Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref:ET10/T-20]1

R.K. TREHAN, Scientist E & Head (Electro -Technical )

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 154.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 )( 1 ) के खंद ( ख ), के अनुसरणा में भारतीय सेना ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानक का संशोधन को विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्मानित हो गए हैं । [PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

अनुसूची

स्थापितं तिथि स्थपित भास्तीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

30 नवम्बर , 2010

कुछ नहीं

1. संशोधन संख्या 1 आई एस 4707 (भाग 2) : 2009 सौंदर्य प्रसाधन कच्ची सामग्री और सहायक सामग्री का वर्गीकरण ( चाग 2 ) कच्ची सामग्री जो कि प्रसाधनो में उपभोग के लिए उपयुक्त नहीं है ( तीसय पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक का संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002, धोत्रीय कार्यालयों, नई दिल्ली, कोलकत्ता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , केयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , अयपुर, कामपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : पीसीडी/जी-7 ( गजट ) ]

डॉ. ( श्रीमती ) विजय मलिक, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( पी सी डी )

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2010

SO: 154. In pursuance of clause (b ) of Sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date of

No. & year of the

Sl. No. and year of the Indian Standards

Established

Indian Standards , if

No. Established

any, superseded by the New Indian Standard

4 12

None

30th November, 2010 1. Amendment.No. 1 to IS 4707 (Part 2): 2009

Classification ofCosmetics and Raw Materials andAdjuncts Part 2 List of raw materials generally not recognized as safe for use in cosmetics (Third Revision)

Copy of this Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110-002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.

[ Ref. PCD/G - 7 (Gazette) ]

Dr. (SMT. ) VIJAY MALIK, Scientist F & Head ( Electro- Technical)

नईदिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 165.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरे' नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक क्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं । [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवारी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या,

संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, क्री संख्या और वर्ष

1. आई. एस 302-2-7 : 2010 घरेलू और समान विद्युत साबित्रों की सुरक्षा : भाग 2 विशेष अपेक्षाएं अनुभाग 7 कपड़े धौने की मशीनें ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियां भारतीय मामक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरकर मार्ग, नई दिल्लीसियों, नई दिल्ली, कोलकता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालमों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, मुनेश्वर, को हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूर्ण तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध है ।

आर.के. नेहन , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं

NewDelhi , the 15th December,2010

S.O. 155. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 ; theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standares, particulars ofwhichare given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Date of

No.&year ofthe

Sl. No. and year of the Indian Standards

Established No. Established

Indian Standards, if any, superseded by theNew Indian Standard

31March, 2010 1 IS 302-2-7 : 2010 Safety of Household and

Similar Electrical Appliances , Part 2 Particular

Requirements . Section 7 Domestic Electric

Clothes Washing Machines ( First Revision)

Copies of these Standares are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan,Van, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices ; New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chounai , Mumbar and also BranchOffices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kampur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram,

RePET 32/T-89 ]

R.K. TREHAN, Scientist F &Head

selectio Technical )

नई दिल्ली 16 दिसम्बर 2010

का. आ. 156.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय भानक न्यूये एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( क्रों ) में संशोधन किया गया किये गये हैं:

370

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीयৰ নাপক वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि

13दिसम्बर , 2010

संशोधन संख्या 6 , नवम्बर 2010

1. आई एस 10001 1981 सामान्य प्रयोजन के लिए समगति संपीडन दहन (डीजल इंजन ( 20 किया तक) की कार्यकारिणा, अपेशाओं की विशिष्टि

10 दिसम्बर , 2010

संशोधन संख्या 2 , नवम्बर 2010

2 आई एस 10002 : 1981 सामान्य प्रभोजन के लिए समगति संत्रीधन पान ( कील ) इंजन ( 20 किया से अधिक ) की कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाओं की

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकत्ता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुभाई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, केयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पढ़ना, पूर्णतालिमपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: टी ई डी/जी -16]

टी. वी. सिंह , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( टी ई डी ) NewDelhi, the 16th December, 2010

S.O. 156-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendments to the Indian Standares , particulars ofwhich are given inthe Schedulehereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. , year and title of the nemended Indian Standards

Sl. No.

No.& year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

13 December ,2010

Amendment No. 6, November2010 .

1. IS10001: 1981 Specification for Performance Requirements for Constant Speed Compression Ignition (Diesel ) Engine for General Purposes (Upto 20 kW)

10 December,2010

Amendment No. 2, November2010

2 IS 10002 : 1981 Specification for Performance Requirements for Constant Speed Compression Ignition (Diesel ) Engine for General Purposes Above20kW)

Copies of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Officer : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. TED/G- 16]

T.V. SINGH , Scientist F & Head ( Transport Engg .) [भाग 1]-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौत्र 25, 1932

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 157. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के वियस 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) को ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करवा है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानकों में संशोधन किया गया है :

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्क

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या, और वर्ष

し

31 1. 2386 ( भाग 1 ) : 1963

4दिसम्बर , 2010

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9, बहादुरशाह जफ़र मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अक्षमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , मुक्भेश्वर, कोलम्पुर, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ :

ए.के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक' एफ ' प्रमुख (सिथि NewDelhi , the 22nd December, 2010

S.O.157.-In pursuance of clause (b) ofSub-rule (1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standard, Ruha, 1987, theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars ofwhich we given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amended Indian Standard

No.& year ofthe amendment

Sl. No.

Dete from which the tahall have effect 1

1. 2386(Part 1) : 1963

4December, 2010

31 Dumber, 2010 Copiesofthe amendment are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manik Bhavan ,9,Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chmqngel , Mombal Branch Offices :Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kaya, Kuan Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram ..

[Ref. CED/Cm ]

A.K. SAINI, Scientist 'F' & Head (Civil Engs.)

नईदिल्ली , 3 जनवरी, 2011

का. आ. 158. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मिथम 1987 के नियम 7 को उप -नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में की पालक ब्यूरो एतद द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक को विवरण अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो मे हैं.

[PART IL-SEC . 3 ( ii) } THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

372

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा

वर्ष और शीर्षक

म स्थापित भारतीय मानक(की) की संख्या, क्या

अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

30 अप्रैल , 2010 1. एस.मी 72 2010 राष्ट्रीय प्रकाश संहिता 2010

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : ईटी 24/पी ।।

आर. के. त्रेहन, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' व प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

New Delhi , the 3rd January, 2011

S.O. 158.In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Date ofEstablished

No. & year ofthe

Sl. No. and year of the Indian Standard

Indian Standards , if

No. Established

any, Supersededby the New Indian

Standard

30 April , 2010 1. SP 72 : 2010 National Lighting Code 2010

Copies of this code is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Ilyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapurani.

[Ref, ET 24/P1 ]

R.K. TREHAN , Scientist ' F ' & Head ( Electro -technical )

नई दिल्ली , 4 जनवरी , 2011 :

का आ. 159.-पारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) केअनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो- एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करती है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :

373 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

अनुसूत्री

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा

स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों ) की संख्या,.

क्रम संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

4 1

28फरवरी , 2010 1. आईएस/आईएसओ 1940-2 : 1997 यांत्रिक कंपन- दृढ़ रोटरों की संतुलन गुणता की अपेक्षाएं भाग 2 संतुलन दोष

-इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग ; नई दिल्ली -110002 क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एम.ई.डी. /जी-2 : ]

सी.के. वेदा, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' व प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजीनियरिंग )

New Delhi , the 4th January, 2011

S.O. 159.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of Sub -rule (1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date of Established

No. & year ofthe

Sl . No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

Indian Standards, if

No.

theNew Indian

any, Superseded by Standard

4 2

28 February, 2010 1. IS/ ISO 1940-2: 1997 Mechanical Vibration-Balance quality requirements of rigid rotors Part 2 Balance errors .

Copies of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur. Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also BranchOffices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref. MED/G-2: 11

C.K. VEDA, Scientist ' F ' & Head (Mechanical Engineering)

कोयला मंत्रालय

नईदिल्ली: 10 जनवरी , 20.11

का. आ. 160.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है, कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लेखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में से कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है;

3GI/11-6 374

[PART I SEC . 3( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

अतः , अब , इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक संख्या सी -1 ( ई ) III/जीआर/ 830-0510 , तारीख 25 मई , 2010 , 'उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि का क्षेत्र के ब्यौरे दिए गए हैं , निरीक्षण , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर-440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन प्रभाग ) , केन्द्रीय खान योजना एवं डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना पेलेस कांके रोड , रांची -834.001 के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700 001 के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर, छिंदवाड़ा-480 001 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

उक्त अनुसूची में विहित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति--

( i ) संपूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उसके ऊपर किसी अधिकार के अर्जन पर आक्षेप, या ( ii ) भूमि या ऐसी भूमि पर कोई अधिकार के प्रतिकर के हित के यदि कोई दावा , या

(iii) खनन पट्टा अर्ज़न करने के अधीन अधिकारों की पूर्वेक्षण अनुज्ञप्ति प्रभावहीन हो जाने और भूमि संबंधी सभी नक्शे, चाटों तथा अन्य दस्तावेजों का परिदान , अयस्कों या अन्य खनिज के नमूनों का संग्रहण और उनका सम्यक् विश्लेषण करने के लिए तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 को उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट कोई अन्य कलावधि अभिलेखों या सामग्रियों की तैयारी के लिए प्रतिकर

इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिनों के भीतर, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , पेंच क्षेत्र , पोस्ट परासिया , तहसील छिंदवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश ) या महाप्रबंधक , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, भूमि और राजस्व विभाग , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर-440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को भेजेगी ।

अनुसूची-'क' धनकासा अंडरग्राऊंड माइन पेंच क्षेत्र जिला-छिन्दवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश ) [ रेखांक संख्यांक सी-1 (ई ) 111 /जीआर/ 830-0510 , तारीख 25 मई, 2010 ]

ग्राम का नाम

क्र.सं.

तहसील

जिला

टिप्पणियां पटवारी सर्किल संख्या

क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टर में )

7 1.

बांकी

भाग

3.008

छिन्दवाड़ा

अमरवाड़ा

2. पायली.

55.416

भाग

परासिया

छिन्दवाड़ा

3. बेहरिया

भाग

121.956

छिन्दवाड़ा

अमरवाड़ा

32.326

भाग

छिन्दवाड़ा

सेजवाड़ा खुर्द

अमरवाड़ा

कुल क्षेत्र : 212.706 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 525.618 एकड़ ( लगभग)

अनुसूची- 'ख '

क्र.सं. ग्राम का नाम

ब्लॉक संख्या तहसील

जिला

टिप्पणियां कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या

क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टर में)

736

परासिया

6.544

भाग

छिन्दवाड़ा

1. नेहरिया आरक्षित वन , परासिया रेंज

ر 737

2. वही-

25.120

परासिया

भाग

छिन्दवाड़ा 375 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

8 3

67.615

भाग

परासिया

738

छिन्दवाड़ा

3. नेहरिया आरक्षित वन , प्ररासिया रेंज

208.485

739

परासिया

4. -वही-

भाग

छिन्दवाड़ा

32.383

भाग 5. -वही-

740

छिन्दवाड़ा

कुल क्षेत्र: 340.147 हेक्टर (लगभग )

या 840.537 एकड़ ( लगभग ) = कुल क्षेत्र

अनुसूची-'क' + अनुसूची-'ख '

340.147 = 552.853 हेक्टर ( लगभग)

212.706 +

525.618

840.537 = 1366.15 एकड़ ( लगभग )

सीमा वर्णन:

'क''ख'

रेखा बिन्दु " क " ग्राम बेहरिया और वने कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 की सम्मिलित सीमा से आरंभ होती है और वत कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 से होकर गुजरती है तथा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 और ग्राम जमुनिया की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

'ख'-' ग'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 और ग्राम जमुनिया की सम्मिलित सीमा से लेकर गुजरती है तथा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 739 और ग्राम जमुनिया से गुजरती है फिर ग्राम जमुनिया और ग्राम पायली की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।

'ग'-' घ'

रेखा ग्राम पायली से होकर गुजरती है तथा ग्राम पायली और वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 736 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती हैं ।

'घ''ड'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 736 से होकर गुजरती है और वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 736 और कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 737 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " ड़ " पर मिलती है ।

'ड''च'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 737 से होकर गुजरती है तथा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 737 तथा 738 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " च " पर मिलती है ।

' च'-' छ'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 738 से होकर गुजरती है तथा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 738 और ग्राम सेजवाड़ा खुर्द की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " छ " पर मिलती है।।

' छ'-' ज' .

रेखा ग्राम सेजवाड़ा खुर्द से होकर गुजरती है तथा ग्राम सेजवाड़ा खुर्द और वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 738 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।

'ज' -' झ'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 738 से होकर गुजरती है तथा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 738 और 739 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।

'झ'-' ज'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 739 से होकर गुजरती है तथा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 739 और ग्राम बेहरिया की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।

'ज''ट'

रेखा ग्राम बेहरिया से होकर गुजरती है तथा ग्राम बेहरिया और ग्राम बांकी की सीमा को पार करती है और फिर ग्राम बांकी से होकर गुजरती है तथा ग्राम बांकी और ग्राम बेहरिया की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " ट " पर मिलती है ।

'ट''ठ''ड'' '' '' त' रेखा ग्राम बेहरिया, से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ठ " - " ड " -" ढ़ " -" ण " के पास से गुजरते हुए ग्राम बेहरिया और वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " त. " पर मिलती है ।

'त'-' थ'-' द'

रेखा वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " थ " के पास से गुजरते हुए वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 740 तथा ग्राम बेहरिया की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " द " पर मिलती है । 376

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )| THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932 、

'द -' थ''न'-' क'

रेखा ग्राम बेहरिया से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ध " तथा " न " के पास से गुजरती है तथा आरंभिक बिन्दु "क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/12/2010-पीआरआई डब्ल्यू- ।।

एस.सी. भाटिया, निदेशक

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 10th January, 2011

S.O. 160. Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And whereas , the Plan bearing number C- 1 (E ) III /GR/ 830-0510, dated the 25th May, 2010 containing ofthe areas of land described in the said Schedules maybe inspected at the office of the Western Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Department) , Coal Estate,Civil Lines , Nagpur-440001 ( Maharashtra ) or at the office of the ChiefGeneral Manager (Exploration Division ). Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road , Ranchi - 834 001 or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata- 700 001 or at the office of the District Collector, Chhindwara -480 001 ( Madhya Pradesh);

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Arcas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

Any persons interested in the land described in the said Schedules may -

(i) Object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land , or of any rights in or over such land , or (ii) claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land, or

(ii) seek compensation for prospecting licences ceasing to have effect , rights under mining leases being acquired, and deliver all maps , charts and other documents relating to the land, collection from the land of cores or other mineral samples and due analysis thereof and the preparation of any other relevant record or materials referred to in Sub- section (7) of Section 13 ofthe saidAct ' .

totheOffice ofthe General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Pench Area , Post Parasia , Tahsil Parasia , District Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh) or General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited , Land and Revenue Department, Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur-400 001 ( Maharashtra ) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE-' A'

DHANKASA UNDERGROUND MINE

PENCH AREA

DISTRICT CHHINDWARA ( MADHYA PRADESH )

[Plan bearing number C- 1 ( E ) III/GR/ 830-0510 , dated the 25th May, 2010 ]

Tahsil

District

Remarks 1. Name of Village

No.

Patwari Circle Number

Area (Inhectares)

7 2

Amarwará

3.008

Part

Chhindwara

Bankee

55.416

Parasia

Chhindwara

Part Paylee

121.956

Part

Amarwara

Chhindwara

Beheria

32.326

Amarwara

Chhindwara

Part SejwaraKhurd

Total area: 212.706 hectares ( approximately ) or525.618 acres ( approximately ) [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Name of Village

Sl . No.

Block Number

Compartment Number

736

41 1. Neharia Reserve Forest, Parasia Range

737

2. -do-

738

3. -do-

739

41 4. -do-

740

41 5. -do-

Schedule -'B'

Schedule -' A'

212.706

340.147

377

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

SCHEDULE-'B'

Remarks Tahsil

District

Area (In-hectares)

8 5

Chhindwara 6.544

Part Parasia

25.120

Chhindwara

Part Parasia

Chhindwara 67.615

Parasia

Part Chhindwara 208.485

Part Parasia . Chhindwara 32.383

Total area : 340.147 hectares ( approximately) or840.537 acres ( approximately)

TotalArea

552.853 hectares (approximately)

+ 840.537

525.618

1366.15 acres ( approximately)

Boundarydescription:

'A' - ' B'

Line starts from Point ' A' on the common boundary of Forest Compartment Number 740 and village Beheria then passes through Forest Compartment Number 740 and meets at Point ' B ' on the common boundary of Forest Compartment Number 740 and village Jamunia.

'B' -'C'

Line passes along the common boundary of Forest Compartment Number 740 and village Jamania, thenForest Compartment Number 739 and village Jamunia and meets at Point C on common boundary ofvillage Jamunia and village Paylee .

'C' -' D'

Line passes through village Paylee and meets at Point. ' D ' on common boundary of village Paylee and Forest Compartment Number 736.

'D' -' E'

Line passes through Forest Compartment Number 736 and meets at Point E' on common boundary of Forest Compartment Number 736 and Compartment Number 737.

'E' - ' F'

Line passes through Forest Compartment Number 737 and meets at point ' F ' on common boundary ofForest Compartment Number 737 and Compartment Number 738.

' F' -' G'

Line passes through Forest Compartment Number 738 and meets at Point 'G'on common boundary of Forest Compartment Number 738 and village Sejwara Khurd.

'G -H

Line passes through village Sejwara Khurd and meets at Point ' H' on common boundary of village Sejwara Khurd and Forest Compartment Number 738 .

'H' - 'I'

Line passes through Forest Compartment Number 738 then meets at Point ' l ' on common boundary ofForest Compartment Numbers 738 and 739 .

Line passes, through Forest Compartment Number 739 then meets at Point " J ' on common boundary of Forest Compartment Number 739 and village Beheria.

' J '- ' K'

Line passes through village Beheria then crosses common boundary of village Beheria and village Bankee then passes through village Bankee and meets at Point ' K ' of common boundar of villages Bankee and Beheria .

' K' -' L -' M' - 'N'-'O' - 'P' Line passes through village Beheria and passes nearby Point ' L - M ' -' N ' -' O ' and theệts at point 'P' on common boundary of village Beheraia and Forest Compartinent Number 740.

P' -' Q' - ' R'

Line passes through Forest Compartment Number 740 and passes nearby. Point ' Q ' and meets at Point' R' on common boundary of Forest Compartiment Number 740 and village Beheria.

' R' -' S' - ' T' -' A'

Line passes through village Beheria and passes nearby point ' S ' and ' T" and meets at starting Point'A' .

F. No. 43015/ 12/2010- PRIW- 11

S.C. BHATIA , Director 378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2011

का. आ. 161.- भारत सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1982 का 50 ) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ . 1450 , तारीख 04 जून, 2010 द्वारा , उसे अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मेटर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- वासुदेवपुर- हावडा गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 12अक्तूबर, 2010 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलव्ध करा दी गई थीं ;

और, पाइपलाइन विछाने के सम्वन्ध में, जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर , सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्नात कर दिया गया;

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और, भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अंतः, अव, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोपणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के वजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिक्लोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:विशाखापट्नम

मंडल/ तहसिल/ तालुक: अनकापल्लि

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे सं /सब डिविजन सं

2 1

वेन्कुमालेम

168/27

168/26ए

168/ 26वी

168/26सी

168 /26डी

168/13

168/12ए

168/ 12 वी

168/12सी

168/14

168/15वी हेक्टेयर

आर.ओ.यू.अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल एयर सिएयर 3

15.

58 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

379

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25, 1932

168/150 1 ) वेन्कुपालेम (निरंतर)

168/16

168/17

168/10ए

168/10वी

168/18

168/9ए

168/9वी

168/7

168/6

168/5वीं

168/5ए

168/8

93/7

93/8

93/5

95/3

95/4

95/5

95/6

95/7

95/11 वी

95/11ए

95/10ए

95/12

95/13

95/14

95/15

95/16

95/17

95/18

95/19

95/20

94/13

94/15

94/34,

94/35

94/16 /

94/11

94/17.

94/18

94/19

94/20

94/10

94/35

94/3डी

94/22

94/23

94/25

94/29

94/26

94/28

94/27

00-

00 02

00 00

94..

00.00

00 01

00 : 01

00 01

پر

: 01

00 02

10.

00 :09

00 00

00 04

0002

00 380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

84.

1) वेन्कुपालेम (निरंतर)

83/1

83/2

82/10

82/30

82/11

82/29

82/28

82/15

82/16

82/18

82/17

82/21

82/22

82/23

6/36

6/28

6/27

6/26

6/25

6/24

6/23

6/22

6/21

6/35

6/34

6/33

6/20

161/10

161/11

161/12ए

161/12वी

161/13

161/14

161/15

1.61/16

161/17

161/18

161/19

161/20

161/21

161/23

161/22

161/28ड़ी

161/28सी

161/28ई

161/ 28वी

161/28ए

161/28 एफ

161/29

161/27

161/26

161/25

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ]

00 02

04.

00 03.

00 04

00 01

00.

42.

01.

82 [भाग II- खण्ड 34 ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

161/24 1 ) वेन्कुपालेम ( निरंतर )

8/1

8/2

5/18

5/20.

5/19

5/5

5/4

160/7

160/5

160/6

160/1

216/6 2 ) सम्पतिपुरम

216/7

218

219/2

219/1

271

221/1

208/3

208/2

208/1

209/2

209/3

209/5

209/6

209/12

209/11

209/1

190

192/1

48/6

3 ) वेटाजंगलापालेम

48/5

41/24

41/25

46/1-

96/3

96/ 2ए

36/11

3GI/ 11-7

381 3

00 . 16

00 16

25 382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

36/12 3 ) वेटाजंगलापालेग (निरंतर)

36/13

36/14

36/15

35/1

35/3

35/4

94/24

94/27

94/30

94/29

94/28

23/7

23/6

23/8

23/9

23/10

23/11

23/12

23/14

24/34

24/33

24/32

510

4 ) सीलोनगरंम

509

418

416/3

416/2

416/1

416/9

420/1

419/66

419/24

419/25

419/26

419/31

419/32

419/33

419/35

419/36

419/37

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)]

00 00

82 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 / पौष 25 , 1932

419/38 4 ) सीतानगरम (निरंतर)

419/39

419/40

419/45

419/47

419/46

419/48

419/49

504

451/1

451/25

451/27

451/28

451/29

451/30

451/45

451/52

451/53

451/54

451/57

451/60

451/66

451/67

451/68

450

453/31

453/30

453/29

453/28

453/27

453/20

453/19

453/18

453/16

453/17

453/15

453/12

453/11

453/10

453/9

453/8

453/7

383 4

-00

00.

00 01.

03.

00. 00

00 384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 1

453/6

4 ) सीतानगरम (निरंतर)

453/4

453/5

453/3

453/2

497/2

459/13

459/12

459/11

459/10

459/9

459/8

459/2

465/1

495/1 वी

495/2

467/12-

467/2

467/1

467/3

467/4

490

486/17

484/16

484/6

484/5

484/1

469/1

483/7

483/9

483/8

483/6

482/4

482/2

482/3

482/1

481/22

481/21

481/20

481/25

481/27

481/28

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii )] 3

00 23

00 08

87 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

481/29 4 ) सीतानगरम (निरंतर)

481/30

480/1

480/2

481/31

481/32

478/3

478/4

478/5

472/13

472/14

477/2

477/1

477/3

477/4

473/7

476

398/1

328

329

331/17

331/27

394

393

330/1

330/2

359/2 5 ) तुम्मापाला

359/3

359/4

359/1

347/10ए

347/10डी

347/11 ए

347/11वी

347/12

347/13

348/1

348/2

348/3

348/8

348/9

348/10

385 3

00 00

-00

00 02

00:

27.

84'

: 00

00 01

0014

04 386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 / PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 1

348/11 5 ) तुम्मापाला (निरंतर)

348/13

353

354

351

334/8

334/7

334/9

334/12

334/13

334/23

334/14

334/15.

334/17

334/20

334/21

334/22

333

334/19

332/1

313/3

313/4

313/5

313/6

313/7

313/8

313/9

313/10

313/11

313/12

313/13

313/14

309/2

309/1

311/3

311/4

311/5

309/16

310

311/6

311/7

304/1

[Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

02.

00 05

69:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( il ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

304/2 5 ) तुम्मापाला (निरंतर)

304/3

304/4

303

302/4

301/3

30-1/2

301/1

289/5

289/4

289/2

289/3

285/1

285/2

285/3

284/4

284/5

282

273/5

269/3

269/2

269/1

253/1

253/2

253/3

251/1

251/2

251/3

251/4

251/8

251/7

251/6

248/18

248/19

248/21

248/24

248/23

248/30

248/31

248/33

248/34

248/35 3

5 00

00 09

90 00 03

67 00

09 00 09

12 00

81 00 09

98 00

01 00

19 00

39 00

$49 00

31 00 08

64 00

22 00

47 00

85. 00

69 29

58 00

76 00

87 00

22 00

42 00 10

17 00 13

65 00 13

53 00 13

71 00

13 388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 5

245/2 तुम्बापाला (निरंतर)

245/3

245/4

245/7

201/3 6 ) मादुदूरू

201/4

201/5

201/6

200

197

199/1

199/2

195/5

195/12

195/13

198/1

198/2

198/3

198/7

198/8

191/1

192/7

192/8

192/9

193/2

193/3

189/1

189/2

189/3

181/1

181/5

181/6

182/1

182/2

166/1

167/7

167/8

167/9

168/14

168/13

168/15

154/2

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 4

71.

00-

00.

08 अनवरी 15 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

भारत का राजपत्र [भाग II- खण्ड ]

154/3 6 ) माधुटूरू (निरंतर)

154/9

154/4

154/5

154/6

154/7

154/8

130/19

153/3

153/8

153/9:

153/10

153/11

153/12

152

130/2

130/3

130/4

130/5

130/6

130/7

138/5

138/6

138/3

138/4

138/2

134/2

134/3

134/4

137/6

137/7

134/1

135/7.

135/8

120/13

1.20/12

120/11

120/10

120/9

120/8

120/7

120/5 3GI/11-8

00 -03

00 03

33 00 09

10 00

80 00

48 00

05 00

48 00 04

52 00 04

83 00

37 00

00.

64 00 12

40 00

78 00 01

10 00

90 00 10

08 00 08

34 00 00

89.

00.

.00 03

24 00 09

10 00

00 390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

120/4 (निरंतर)

120/3

120/2

112/8

119/1-

118/3

118/2

118/1

117/3

220/1 रेवाका

220/3

220/4

220/5

222/1

224

225/2

2.25/3

225/5

211

207

210

223/1 8

182/1 माकवरम

181/8

181/19

181/20

181/22

181/23

182/2

163.

162

164

166/1

166/2ए

185/3

185/4

185/5

185/7

185/8

185/9

185/10

185/17

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )] 3

10, भास्त

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

15, 2011 25 , 1932

185/18 8 कवरम (निरंतर)

185/19

185/20

185/21

185/22

151/1

184/13

184/14/

184/15

184/12

184/10

149/5

149/4

149/3

149/2

149/1

150/15

150/1

150/2

150/3

148

147

144/4-

144/5

144/6

144/7

165 १ ) कोन्डुपालेम

218

219/1-

227/1

227/2

227/3

227/4

223/2

223/3

223/4

223/10

223/12

223/13

223/14

223/15

223/16

223/17

223/18

223/19

223/20

223/21

223/23

224/1

224/2

224/3

2.24/4 00 03

.05

18 00 00

00 05

72 00

08 00

00 06

49 007 09

40 00

07.

87 00

50 00

01-

53 00 08

91 00

34 00

74 00 20

81 00

50-

25 00 06

10 00

40 00

00 00

55 004 02

65 02

70 -00

50 00

$0 01

00 04

00 00

00 00. 04

50 0002

0000

00 00 04-

00 00 : 98

57 0000

10 392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

224/6 9)कोन्युपालन, (निरंतर)

225/2

225/3

204

201

202

203/1

191/20

190

189/50

189/6ए

189/7ए

189/8ए

189/9ए

189/10ए

205

[Part II Sec. 3( i )] 3

00 01

00 07

01 06

11.

00 { 00

00 12

15-

फासं. एल. - 14014/55/2009-जी.पी. ] के.के .शर्मा , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

'New Delhi , the 10th January, 2011

8. 0. 161. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 1450 dated 04th June , 2010, issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada -Basudebpur -Howrah gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited by M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;

Andwhereas, the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 12th October,2010;

And whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority,

And whereas , the Coment Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India; ۱

And whereas , Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932 , KA SH

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, free from all encumbrances .

Schedule

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Anakapalli

State AND

District:Visakhapatnam

Village

Survey No./Sub-DivisionNo.

2 1

1 ) Venkupalem

168/27-

1.68/26A

168/26B

168/260 :

168/26D

168/13

168/12A

168/12B

168/12C

168/14

168/15B

168/15A

168/16

168/17 :

168/10A

168/10B

168/18

168/9A

168/9B

168/7

168/6

168/5B

168/5A

168/8

93/7

93/8

93/5

95/3

95/4

95/5

95/6

95/7

95/11B

95/11A

95/10A Ares

Are

Hec

5 00

38 00

15 00

58. 00

26 00

43 00

37 00

58 00

55 00

49 00

70 00

10. 00.

90.

10 00

59 00

33 00

16-

74 00

01 .

00.

81 00

00.

12 394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 kupalean (Cond)

95/12

95/13

95/14

95/15

95/16

95/17

95/18

95/19

95/20

94/13

94/15

94/34

94/35

94/16

94/11

94/17

94/18-

94/19

94/20

94/10

94/3E

94/3D

94/22

94/23

94/25

94/29

94/26

94/28

94/27

83/1

83/2

82/10

82/30

82/11

82/29

82/28

82/15

82/16

82/18

82/17

82/21

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii) ]

.00

02:

10.

10-

00 : 00

99 00

1 00

84 भारत का राजमंत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1) Venkupalem (Contd)

82/22

82/23

6/36

6/28

6/27

6/26

6/25

6/24

6/23

6/22

6/21

6/35

6/34

6/33

6/20

161/10

161/11

161/12A

161/12B

161/13

161/14

161/15

161/16

161/17

161/18

161/19

161/20

161/21

161/23

161/22

161/28D

161/28C

161/28E

161/28B

161/28A

161/28F

161/29

161/27

161/26

161/25 00 02

95 00

91 00

76 00

02 00

25 00

72 00

71 00

71 po

00.

00-

75 00

25 00:

06 00

49 00

57 00

61 00

56 00

82 10396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

161/24

8/1

8/2

5/18

5/20

5/19

5/5

5/4

160/7

160/5

160/6

160/1

216/6 2) Sampatipuean

216/7

218

219/2

219/1

271

221/1

208/3

208/2

208/1

209/2

209/3 ,

209/5

209/6

209/12

209/11

209/1

190

192/1

48/6 3 Vetazangahalem

48/5

41/24

41/25

46/1

96/3

96/2A

36/11

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)] 3

5 00

> 03

12-

16.

02.

25 [भाग II- खा 300

36/12

36/13

36/14

36/15

35/1

35/3

35/4

94/24

94/27

94/30

94/29

94/28

23/7

23/6

23/8

23/9

23/10

23/11

23/12

23/14

24/34

24/33

24/32

$10 4 ) Sithanagar

509

418

416/3

416/2

416/1

416/9

420/1

419/66

419/24

419/25

419/26-

419/31

419/32

419/33

419/35

419/36

419/37 3GI/11-9

10 00

00 00

00 00 00

00 00

27 00

01 200

07 00

02 00

00 00

04 00

03 00

00 00

05 00

06 00

004 00

05 00

02 00

07 00

07 $00

00 80.

06 00

00 00

00 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011/PAUSA 25, 1932

2 419/38

419/39

419/40

419/45

419/47

419/46

419/48

419/49

504

431/1

451/25

451/27

451/28

451/29

451/30

451/45

451/52

451/53

451/54

451/57

451/60

451/66

451/67

451/68

450

453/31

453/30

453/29

453/28

-453/27

453/20

453/19

453/18

453/16

453/17

453/15

453/12

453/11

453/10

453/9

453/8

453/7

00.

17,

00,

92 03

20.

56 [ भाग II-खण्ड (ii) )

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 2011 /पौष 23, 1932

453/6 4) Sithanagaren (Cented)

'453/4

453/5

453/3

453/2

497/2

459/13

459/12

459/11

459/10

459/9

459/8

459/2

465/1

495/1B

495/2

467/12

467/2

467/1

467/3

467/4

490

486/17

484/16

484/6

484/5

484/1

469/1

483/7

483/9

483/8

-483/6

482/4

482/2

482/3

482/1

481/22

481/21

481/20

-481/25

481/27

-481/28

81 00

00-

08-

100

00 00

11 00

27 00

00 08

03 [Part II Sec . 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

481/29 481/30 480/1

480/2

481/31 481/32 478/3

478/4

478/5

472/13 472/14 477/2

477/1

477/3

477/4

473/7

476

398/1

328

329.

331/17

331/27

394

393

330/1

330/2

359/2

359/3

359/4

359/1

347/10A 347/10B 347/ 11A 347/ 11B 347/12 347/13 348/1

348/2

348/3

348/8

348/9

348/10

5 00

00.

02,

-18

17 :

07.

00 106

00 : 11

11.

00,

00 ..09

24-

04 15/2011/ 25, 1932

[ भाग1]- खण्ड 3(B)]

348/11

5) Turipe (Contd)

348/13

353

354

351

334/8

334/7

334/9

334/12

334/13

334/23

334/14

334/15

334/17

334/20

334/21

334/22

333

334/19

332/1

313/3

313/4

313/5

313/6

313/7

313/8

313/9

313/10

313/11

313/12

313/13

313/14

309/2

309/1

311/3

311/4.

311/5

309/16

310

311/6

311/7

304/1 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 304/2

304/3

304/4

303

302/4

301/3

301/2

301/1

289/5

289/4

289/2

289/3

285/1

285/2

285/3

284/4

284/5

282

273/5

269/3

269/2

269/1

253/1

253/2

253/3

251/1.

251/2

251/3

251/4

251/8

251/7

251/6

248/18

248/19

248/21

248/24

248/23

248/30

248/31

248/33

248/34

248/35

[Part II Sec. 3(ii ) ]

5 00

67, 00

00 .

00 : 08

50... :

.14

02.

76 23

00 .

00-

13 भारत का राप्यपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (il) ]

5) Tumnapala (Contd)

245/2

245/3

245/4

245/7

201/3 6 ) Maruturu

201/4

201/5

201/6

200

197

199/1

199/2

195/5

195/12

195/13

198/1

198/2

198/3

198/7

198/8

191/1 .

192/7

192/8

192/9

193/2

193/3

189/1

189/2

189/3

181/1

181/5

181/6.

182/1

182/2

166/1

167/7

167/8

167/9

168/14

168/13

168/15

154/2 00

00 03

81 00

30 00

05 00

15 00

25 00

01 [Part II-Sec. 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 154/3

154/9

154/4

154/5

154/6

154/7

154/8

130/19

153/3

153/8

153/9

153/10

153/11

153/12

152

130/2

130/3

130/4

130/5

130/6

130/7

138/5

138/6

138/3

138/4

138/2

134/2

134/3

134/4

137/6

137/7

134/1

135/7

135/8

120/13

120/12

120/11

120/10

120/9

120/8

120/7

120/5

5 00

1 00

50.

00 .

100

96 [भाग II- खण्ड 30 ]

भारत का राजमंत्र : जन 15 2011 / 25, 1992

6) Maraturi ( Cont )

120/4,

120/3

120/2

112/8

119/1

118/3

118/2

118/1

117/3

220/1 7 ) Rebaka

220/3

220/4

220/5

222/1

224

225/2

225/3

225/5

211

207

210

223/1

182/1 8 ) Makavaram

181/8

181/19

181/20

181/22

181/23

182/2

163

162

164

166/1

166/2A

185/3

18544

185/5

185/7

185/8

185/9

185/10

185/17 3GI/11-10

81 00

00- 38

90 00

00 [Part II-Sec . 3( 1) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 185/18

185/19

185/20

185/21

185/22

151/1

184/13

184/14

184/15

184/12

184/10

149/5

149/4

149/3

149/2

149/1

150/15.

150/1

150/2

150/3

148

147

144/4

144/5

144/6

144/7

165

218

219/1

227/1

227/2

227/3

227/4

223/2

223/3

223/4

223/10

223/12

223/13

223/14

223/15

223/16

72 00

65 00

03.

10 00

34 00

63.

74 00

72 00

50 00

55 00

71 00

25 00

02.:

70 00

'50

50 [ भाग II- 3( ii) ]

223/17 9) Kondupalest (Courd)

223/18

223/19

223/20

223/21

223/23

224/1

224/2

224/3

224/4

224/6

225/2

225/3

204

201

202

203/1

191/20

190

189/5A

189/6A

189/7A

189/8A

189/9A

189/10A

205

57 00

IF. No. L-14

नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2011

का. आस. 162.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिल में मि विजयवाडा-नैल्लोर -सैन्नई पाइपलाइन के टर्मिनल प्वाइंट से देश की विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक के लिए मैसर्स रिक्लोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा वैसई वंगलौर मंगलौर पाइपलाइन विधाई जानी ताहिए;

और, भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए वह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपावद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपवीग के अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः, अब, भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितवद्ध है , उस कारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की सरा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियां सांधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री के. महणीनाथ, रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्धर लिमिटेड , 74, दूसरी मंजिल, प्रेस्टीन फिरोज, कन्निगहाम रोड, वमगलौर - 580034,1 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

अनुसूची

जिला : हासन तालुक

सर्वे सं / सब डिविजन सं.

1) नरशी

3) अनुनमाणु

24:

2.1

24-

सर्वे नं 23 , 22

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii)] राज्य : कर्नाटक

आर-ओ- यू- अर्जित करने के लिए बेत्रपाल

सिएयर हेक्टेबर एयर

5 00 69

75 00

00 00

06 00 ,

00 29

37 00 66

97 00 93 27 00

0024

05 00 18 09 00 06

77 00- 08

86 00 09

37 00 03-

24 00 00

और 73 के बीच मे नाला

सर्वे नं 91. 00

00 24

28 00 29

0.6

76 00

00 00

2.2 00

और 109 के बीच मे नाला

109

110

108

107

106

111

105

सर्वे नं 105

06 00 007 69 00 06 21 00 26

0.0

68 00 20

24 0031

और 131 के बीच मे नाला

131

126

सर्वे नं 126 00 4.7

73 00 37

81 00 09

और 125 के बीच मे रोड

125

जिला: हासन

00 08

77 राज्य: कर्नाटक

04 83

10 15 / 2011/पौत्र 25, 1932

नवरी [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (i) )

118

(निरंतर)

1375

140

141

148

158

159

164

175

180

185

190

195

196

200

199

147

जिला: हासन तालुक: वेलुर

1 ) बग्मेनहल्ली

2) हनिके

गार्दै की गडि

118

114

335 3) हीरमप्ये

337

336 00

00 65

00 01

00 41

06 00 44 18

47 00

0049

0052

0051

0050

00 50

00 38

09 00 11

0013

00 96

00 72 17

17 0000

0020

0057

22 00010

100 10

00 1247

03 22 00

تو

00 22 01

70 00 11

00 20 09 00 01

-00

52 58 00

77 00

200 12

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 18/3

18/1

18/2

17/1

16/1

16/2

16/3

15/2

15/1

13/1

13/2

11/2

[Part II-Seo . 3 ( ii) ]

5 00 21

51 00 45

32 00

00 02

20 00

00 : 08

15 00 04

99 00 09

89 00 :06

54 00 09

58 00 23

79 00 18: 30 00 20

68 00

58 00 07

17 00 04

80 सर्वे नं 10 और 7 के वीच में सरकारि खराय

7/5थी 1

186

00 04

38 00

84 00 40

88 00 25

69 00

97 00

22 00

82 00 06

00 सर्वे नं 186 और 190 के बीच मे रोड

190

191

21 00 42

75 00. 20 50 सर्वे नं 191 और 194 के बीच मे ग्रामटाणा

194/3

सर्वे नं 5 और 7 के वीच मे ग्रामटाणा

7/2

7/1

18/1

2216

22/4

22/3

22/5

52 00 48

23. 00 19

04 00 18

67 00 22

60 00 40

66 00 08. 00 00 04 96 00 00

67 00 42

94 00 03

34 00 03

57 00

38 15, 2011 / 25

35/3

35/2

36/1

36/2

39/1

39/3

39/2

41/2

41/1

6) वेंकटपेटे

11/2

सर्वे नं 11 और 12 के बीच में रोड

12/1

9/1

39/1

39/2

41/1

41/2

41/4

47/1

35/1सी

35/1 वी

161

7) हिरेगरर्जि

162/2

162/1

162/3

163/2

160/3

0004

00 60%

00 07

0000

00 03

00 07

00 06

0016

0015

71 0000

71 0012

0014

0018

00 27 60 0015

00 20

00 02

00 44

200

00 90

0032

00 20

00 35

00 412

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

160/4

163/1

160/2

160/1

159/2

159/1

158

46/2

46/1

49/1

50/2

53/2

51/3

53/1

59/2

62/2

30/2

28/5

28/3

28/2

29/2

29/3

23/2

2.0

145

17/1

16/2

144

143

132

133

131

135

00 .

00 35

41 00 13,

10 00

28 -02

41 '00

00 19 - 31 00 16= 85 00 12

29 00 19. 35 0.0 04 99

55 00

29 00

00 .

97 00 05

96 00 01

35 00 15

90 00

23 00 22

37 00

00 00

10 00 12

08 00 43

51 00

93 00 74 10

67 00

65 00 22 11 00

26 00 、

00 91

01 00 06

21 00 29

76 00 2599 00

00 02

73 Z 1

128

9 ) अरेहल्ली (निरंतर)

126

127

103-

102

100

208

216

214

212

19/2

10) मालहल्ली

19/1

18/1

22/1

00 2890

07 00 31

51 -00 12

0022

04- 00

00 . 03 22

54 0031

36 00 06

07: 90 00

47 00 08

00 20

25 00- 05

01.

83 00 41

56 00

63.

68 00 13

90 -00 58

60 00 45

72 00 29

00 1168

09 00

یہ

13.

26 00

-75

00 .

सर्वे नं 29,30 और गावँ सीमा के वीच मे नालो

2/2

11 ) गुरगिहल्ली

43-

44 20 00

01 05 88

94 00 27 93 00 85

45. 00 81

81 414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932.

64/2

64/1 ए

64/1वी

8.1

125

12) मलवावरा

134

123/2

130

131

132

133

121

120/2

120/1

-119/2.

111

110/2

110/1

सर्वे नं 110 और 96 के वीच मे रस्ता,

226

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

26 00 12

33 00 20

84 00 22

35 00 24

54 00 11

30 00 01

24 00 18

44 00 06

73 00 33

87 00 01

75 00 12

58 00

14 00

00 20

77 00

00 42

74 00 11

23 00 01

73 00 09

49. 00 18

54 00 47.

75 00 32

85 00 46

33 00 14

77 00 00

86 00

00 52

14 01 05 92

77 00 01

सर्वे नं 8 और 49 के बीच मे नाला

00 10

सर्वे नं 8 मे नाला

13) कामवली

सर्वे नं 25 और गावँ सीमा के वीच में नाला

33/1

34.

00. 03 93 00 17 10 00 08

44 00

22 00 55

21 00 00 10 00 46

47 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii )]

415

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25, 1932

13)

(निरंतर)

14) उम्बसगोड

18/2

19/1

18/3

26/2

26/1

23/1

24/6

24/5

24/4

24/2

81 00

t 2.6 00 08

59 68

48 00 34 68

36 00

28 0017

08 00%

00 00

00 29

08 07.

फासे. एल. - 14014/115/2010- जी.पी. ] के.के.शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th January, 2011

S.O. 162. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from terminal point of Vijayawada-Nellore- Chennai pipeline near Tiruttani in TamilNadu to consumers in various parts of the country, Chennai - Bangalore Mangalore pipeline should be laid by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And, whereas, it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of Indiaunder sub- section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object în writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land tork. Mallinath , Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, No.74, 2nd Floor, Prestige Feroze, Cunningham Road, Bangalore- 560052, Karnataka State .

416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

Schedule

Taluk: Hassan

State: Karnataka

District: Hassan

Village

Survey No./Sub-Division No.

2 1

1) Narashipura

2) Yalegondaneballi

3) Anuganalu

.25

4) Kamenahalli

Area to be acquired for RoU

C-Are Hec

Are

5 00

20 00

43 00

06 00

37 00

97 00

27 00

58 00

05 00

09 00

77 00

86 00

37 00

24 00

33 00

71.

Nala between Sy.No. 23 , 22 & 73

28 00

02 41 00

76 00

18 :

17 00

00、

Nala between Sy.No. 91 & 109

109

110

108

107

106

111

105

06. 21 00

24 00

Nala between Sy.No. 105 & 131

131

126

73. 00

Road between Sy.No. 126 & 125

125

-77 State: Karmataka

District: Hassan

1) Manjejushalli Kaval

83 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011. 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

118 1) Manjosiahalli Kaval (Contd)

137

140

141

148

158

159

164

175

180

185

190

195

196

200

199

147

District : Ras Taluk: Belur

7 1) Bammenahalli

12 Hanike

Village Limit

118

114

51.

;

335 3) Heeraguppe

337

336 3

06 00

13 00

47 00

53 00

92 -00-

24 00 -51

47 00

67 00

09 00

38 00.

State: Kar

54 00

17 00

78 0040

003252

08 00 40

14. 00

95 00:

38 00

47 00

11.

09 -00

41 00:01

61 00

5238- 00

77 0002

63 0002

60 18

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

18/3

18/1

18/2

17/1

16/1

16/2

16/3

15/2

15/1

13/1

13/2

11/2

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii))

32 00

18.

15 00

99 00

54 00

58 00

36 00

58 00

17 00

Govt. Kharab Between Sy.No. 10 & 7

7/5B1

186 5) Mattavara

78 00

84 00

88 00

97 00

22 00

82- 00

Roadbetween Sy.No. 186 & 190

190

191

21 00

75 00

Gramatana between Sy.No. 191 & 194

194/3

5 00

23 00

Gramatanabetween Sy.No. 5 & 7

7/2

7/1

18/1

22/6

22/4

22/3

22/5 00

60 00

00- 00

67 00

34 00

57 00

38 [ भाग II- खण्ड3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/ 25, 1932

5) Mattavara(Contd)

35/3

35/2

36/1

36/2

39/1

39/3

39/2

41/2

41/1

17 6) Venkatapete

11/2

RoadBetween Sy.No. 11 & 12

12/1

9/1

39/1

39/2

41/1

41/2

41/4

47/1

35/1C

35/1B

161 7) Hiregarji

162/2

162/1

162/3

163/2.

160/3 00

90 00

73 00 07

41 00

15.

70 00

10 00

13 00

03.

66 00

05 00

41. 00

73 00

29 00

09 00

52. 00

45 00

6386

71 00

10 00

14.

24 : 00

68 00

83 00

17.

62 00

09 00

15 88

91 00

02 01

06 00

44.

00 71 00

57 00

79 00

27 00

35 45 0006

23 420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

160/4 Hirogarji ( Coned)

~ 7)

163/1

160/2

160/1

159/2

159/1

158

46/2

46/1

49/1

50/2

53/2

51/3

53/1

59/2

62/2

30/2

28/5

28/3

28/2

29/2 8) Kadegarji

29/3

23/2

21:

145

18.

17/1

16/2

144 Arehalli

143

9.1

132

133-

131

135

[Part II-Sec. 3( ii)]

5 3

21 00

40 00

42. 00

50 00

41 00

10 00

41 00

31 00

29 00

35 00

99 00

96 00

35 00

90 00

23 00

37 00

93 00

10 00

08-

43 51 00 、

09 . 93

-10 00

67 00

65 00

11 00

30 00

01 00

76 00

50 00

21 00

73 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौत्र 25, 1932-

9) Arehalli (Contd)

128

126

127

93-

90.

103

102.

100

208

216

214

212

19/2 10) Malahalli

19/1

18/1

22/1

29 00

90 00

39 00

31-

07 00

51 00

04 00

76 00

22 00

31-

54 00

*306

47 00

20 75 00

05 25 00.

01- 83

56 .00

-63

90 00

60 00. 49

97 00

72 00

52 00

-68

09 00

72 00

75 00

00 . 05

45 00

Nalabetween Sy No. 29,30 & V.B

2/2

43 11) Guragihalli

48.

67 3GI/11-12

00 ..

73 00

47 00

88 00

94 00

45. 00

69 00

37 81 422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

Guraghalli ( Could)

11 )

64/2

64/1A

64/ 1B

125

Malasavar

134

123/2

130

131

132

133

121

120/2

120/1

119/2

111

110/2

110/1

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii ) ]

5 00

26 00

33 00 20 84 00

35 00

54 00

30 00

24 00

44. 00

87 00

58 00

14. 00

48 00

77 00

40 00

68 00

74 00

00.

49 00

24 00

Cart track between Sy.No. 110 & 96

226

Nala between Sy.No. 8 & 49

Nala in the Sy.No. 8 11) Kaanshali

Nala between Sy.No. 25 & V.B

33/1

76 00 .

85 00

33 00

14.

77 00

86 00

00 00

14 01

05.

92 00

60 00

03 21 00

93 00

10 00

44 00

22 00

21 00

00 . 46

47 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

13) Kaanahalli (Contd)

35.

14) Umbalagod

08.

18/2

19/1

00 0036

18/3

26/2

08.

26/1

35 81

23/1.

21-

24/6

24/5

24/4

00 01.

24/2

[F. No. L-14014/115/2010-G.P.1

K.K. SHARMA, Under Secye

नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी , 2011

का. आ. 163.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तमिलनाडु में तिलसन्नी के पास विजयवाडा-नैल्लोर-चैन्नई पाइपलाइन के टर्मिनल प्वाइंट से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा चैन्नई- ट्यूटीकोरिन पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और, भारत सरकार को उक्त फाइफलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आबश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जनकिया जाए;

अतः, अब, भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइनः (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकारका अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसकी उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के गइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री एस . राजामनिक्कम, सलग प्राधिकारी, 'फास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड, नं० 9डी/ 6डी, रामकृष्णपुरम, पील्लैयार कोवील के सामने , कदूर 639001 , तमिलनाडु में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

अनुसूची

जिला:सेलम तालुका आत्तुर

सर्वे सं/ सब डिविजन सं-

7 あ

7/4

6/33

11/14

11/12

सर्वे नं. 11/11/1 में रास्ता

12/36

-12/29

12/37

12/28

12/41

12/27

12/26

12/24

12/21

12/22

सर्वे न. 16/19 में नाला

16/17

16/16

17/3

17/1

17/2

17/5

15/16

15/17

15/19

15/18

5/68

2) आस्तुर वार्ड थी

5/67

5/66

5/60/3

5/60/2

5/60/1

5/57/2

5/57/1

5/54/3

5/54/1

[Part II-Sec. 3(i ) ) राज्य: तमिलनाडु

आर- ओ -यू-अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेतफल.

हेक्टेयर एयर सि एयर 3

5 02 81

17 00

33 0002

84. 00 46

32 00 00

56 00

00 66

68 00 10

97 00 : 03

72 00 02

33 00 00

10 00 20 73 00 32

35 00 59

19. 00 06

25 00 18

02 00 03

68 00 33 88. 00 25 28 00 00

10 00 01

28 00

45 00

84 00

22 00 03

61 00

00 13

00 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पान 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 2)

5/22

(निरंतर)

5/21

5/19

5/20/5

5/20/2

-5/10

5/12

5/11

5/14

5/6/1

5/4

6/1/1

6/1/8वी

6/1/8ए

6/1/10

6/2/1

6/2/2

6/2/3 3

0000

01 00 01

45 00 29.

0002 31

02. 88 00

00 32 57

09 00 09

53 00 ,

10 0005 .

87 0045

79 00 47

80 0044 34 00 0368

0037 00

00 01

29 राज्य:तमिलनाडु

जिना नमक्कल

तालुक: नमक्कल

सर्वे न . 2 में रास्ता 1) पुरुकर्कीबाय

4/10

4/1बी

14/1

15/1ए

15/1 बी

15/2ए

15/ 2बी

15/3ए

15/3डी

17/3ए

19/4

19/2बी

20/1:

139/1

144/5 S केज

140/7 नीचे पाइपल्..

140/2 रिलोजिसटिक्स इंन्

140/3 राज्यको लिखित रूप ..

142/80

142/5वी

142/6

142/7 00 02 93

55 00 33

30 0012

34:

00 18

83 00 06

27 00 01

20 07 00

0025 54

22.59 00

: 28

0.9

98 00 40

11 0000

00 16. 88 00

93 00 特 39

00 00

06 426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

5 3

10. 00

141/4

20 .

142/8

142/9

161/2

161/1

76 00 08

163/5

163/3

163/1-

17 00

59 00

163/2

56 00

164/1

166/1

166/3

54 00

166/4

167

00 25

30 00

173/7

174/2

32 00 03

सर्वे न . 174/8 में रास्ता

42 00 00

173/1

177

74 00

176/1

65 00 47

182/30

सर्वे न . 182/ 3बी में रास्ता

186

17 00

200/1

88 00

200/3

199/1 बी

199/4

1.6 00

199/5

00 54 98

198/1

205 .

00 21

00-

सर्वे न . 198/2 में रास्ता

जिला:विरूधनगर तालुक अविरुधनपर

राज्य: तमिलनाडु

86/1

1 ) अपायनाप

86/2

85/2

83/2

53 00

83/3

00 17

83/4ए

83/4वी

02-

09 00

सर्वे न . 83/ 6बी में रास्ता

सर्वे न . 83/ 10 बी में रास्ता 00 01 08

83/6सी

33 00 13

83/9

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौत्र 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

83/10सी

सर्वे न . 80 में नाला

111/3

111/4

111/6

110/1

111/7

111/10

111/12

114/6

114/7

119/1

सर्वे न . 114/5 में नाला

सर्वे न . 117/8 में नाला

117/7

117/ 6वी

117/5

जिला:विरूधनगर तालुक:सात्तुर

170

1) सिन्दुक्मपट्टी विट-1

171/1

171/3

जिला मदुर तालुक:तिरूमंगलम

9/ 2बी

1 ) वन्नाकुलंग

9/4ए

9/4बी

14/2

2) उरप्पनुर

14/1

14/5

14/6

15/2

21/1 ए

21/1बी

15/13बी

21/1सी

21/1सी.

21/2

21/4

21/10

सर्वे न. 16 में साला

17/4सी

17/6

17/7

17/8

001707 00

27 00

11 00

00 . 03 45 00 02

'15

21 00 13

08 49 00

00 00

39. 00 11. 52

52 00 14

56 राज्य तमिलनाडु

00 04 32 00 43

39 राज्य:तमिलनाडु

00 60 60 00 12

06 00 29 23.

31 0009

14 00 18

00 0454 00 07

48.

00 02 02

17 00 07

77 00

00 16 7.1. 00 15 98

44 00 00

44 75 00

50 00 08 428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

17/1 ई

2 ) उरप्पपुर (निरंतर )

18/3बी

18/4

196

195/ 1 ए1 ए

195/1 ए 1 बी

195/ 1 ए2

195/2

195/3

195/4ए

199/4

199/10

199/11

199/12

199/4वी

199/7

199/13

199/14

199/15

199/9

200

203

202

207

206/4ए

206/30 1

206/ 3 ए2

206/3बी

208/ 2ए

208/1 ए1

208/4

208/12

208/ 9 ए

208/9बी

208/9सी

208/9डी

208/9 號

212/1 सी 1

212/ 2 ए

212/ 2बी

212/ 5ए

212/5बी [Part II-Sec. 3 ( 11) ]

00 14

00 00

00 04

00 08

00 02

00 07

10.

.00

00 01

00 03

00 08

00 02

00 28

00 08

00 09

00 06

03 02

00 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2081/पौष 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

212/5सी 2) उम्मपुर (निरंतर)

212/5डी

211/ 2ए2

211/3

211/4

2/11 3) सतन्कुखी

2/1 बी 1

2/1 ए2

2/1बी 2

2/1सी 1

2/1सी2

2/3

19/1 ए

19/12

19/2

सर्वे न . 19/3 में नाला

1.9/50

19/5सी

19/5डी

22/1 ए

22/1वी

22/5

17/6

22/6ए

17/ 8वी 2

17/10सी

16/302

16/3बी

16/3सी2

16/4ए

सर्वे न. 16/4वी में नाला

16/4सी

25/301

सर्वे न . 25/302 में नाला

सर्वे न . 25/3बी2 में माला

25/3बी1

25/6ए

25/6बी

27/7बी 3GI/11-13

000000 00 16 30

15 28 00

67 00 92

12 00 01:

37 0017

00 00 11

06 65 00.

00 05

11 49 00

00 18 57

85 00

19 72 00 、

15 05 00-

52 0014

79 00 15

91 00 00

37 00

0018

00 09 04

00 0196 00 10 77

68 0000

65 00 02 430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 3)

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )]

सर्वे न . 28 में नाला

27/ 8बी

30/2ए

32/4

32/11

32/8

34/1ए

09 21 00

52 00 23

21 0.0 24

22 50 00

47 00 26

12 0-0

64 00

सर्वे न . 130/1 में रास्ता

131/ 2बी 1

सर्वे न . 131/ 2 बी 2 में नाला

38 00. 17.

सर्वे न . 132/ 3ए में नाला

131/4ए

131/4बी

01.

99 00

सर्वे न . 132/3बी में नाला

132/3सी

133/2बी

142/1.

150/3

75 00

94 00

सर्वे न . 151/2 में नाला

151/5

149/2ए

149/ 2बी

152

153/3ए

153/1

153/2

153/7ए

159/1बी

159/3

159/4

274/2

274/3ए

274/3बी

274/3सी

274/4

274/7ए

273/2ए

02 .36 00

34 00

51 00

15.

28 00

62 00

75 00

39 00

16 00 05.

06 00

38 00 05

30 00

40 00

91 00

273/ 2बी

273/3बी

273/3सी

00 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पोव 25, 1932

269/1बी (निरंतर)

269/2

269/3

269/4

269/5

270/1

270/2

271/6

271/7-

268/ 2ए

267/1

267/2

267/3

267/5ए

266/1

259/1

259/ 2ए

259/ 2बी

261/3बी

261/4

2'61/5डी

260/2

260/3

9/2ए

9/2खी1

9/2बी 2

9/3बी

10/3

11/1ए

11/1थी

11/1सी

11/2

13/3

12/4

12/5

12/6

22/1

जिला ४मयुरे तालुक:वाडिपट्टि

54 1) अर्येतन्कराय

53/5वी 2

53/2ए.

53/501 0004 2

01 00 01

93 0012

30 7.00 04

39 0035

00 00 81

90 00

64 00 16

74 00 04

26 00

06 00 03

45 00 24

50 00 21

83 00 07 86

16 00

72- 00 12.

00 09 20

49 00 24

44 0015

17.

00-

03 00 01

45 0028

83 00 20 :

58 00 07

13-

01 00 25

26.

00 11

36 राज्य उतमिलनाडु

00.

10 0.0 00

00 00 31, 432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

53/1ए

53/1बी

53/502

53/2बी

53/3

53/4

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

31 00

28 00

19 00

40 00

34 00 01-

सर्वे न . 56 में नाला

49/1

48/1 ए

48/1बी

89/2

01 00 29

00 13

07 00 14

77 00

01 -76 00

सर्वे न . 88 में नाला

87/1

61/2

62 00

87 00

सर्वे न . 85 में नाला

67/2

67/3

68/4

82/1 ए

82/1बी

82/ 2ए1

82/ 2ए2

82/2बी

80/1

80/2

80/3

80/4

-74/1

75/2

73/2

352/1

351

350/1

350/2

349/2ए

349/2बी

349/1

349/4 :

348/1

343/1

00 00.

54 00 10

73 00 06、

13 00 14

20 00 08

05 00

00 01. 54

62 00 23

00 26

92 00 05

64 00

00 09

61 00

85 00

00 09

46 00 22

54 00

85 00 02

43 00. 10

92 00 03

31 00

सर्वे न . 357 में नाला

339/3

19 00 48 भारत का राजपत्र

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

करी 15, 2011/पौष 25, 1932

339/5

1) अर्पतन्कराय (निरंतर)

00 15 10

339/6

00 27

338

00 05

339/7

17.3 83

339/4

08 78

सर्वे न . 518 में नाला

373

0025

37.2/1

372/2

374

00 40

527

00 20 06

375

00 02 82

528

00 05

फासं. एल-14014/114/2016

New Delhi , the10th January, 2011

S. O. 163. Whereas it appears to government of India that it is nepossary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from terminal point of Vijayawada Nollose - Chanai pipeline near Tiruttani in TamilNadu to consunters in various parts of the country, Chennai Tuticorin pipeline should be laid by M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And, whereas, it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid andwhich are described in the Schedule aanexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), Government of Indiaherebydeclares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for faying the pipeline , under the land to Shri S.Rajamaníckam, Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, No. 9D/6D Ramakrishnapuram, Opp. Pillayar Kovil, Karur - 639 001, Tamil Nadu State.

434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

[Part 11-Sec.3(il)]

Schedule

District: Salem Taluk:Attur

State:Tamil Nadu

Survey No./Sub-Division

Village

2 1

7/4

1) AttunWardA

6/33

11/14

11/12 Area to be acquired for Rou

Are

Hec

C-Are

5 3

17 02

84 00

83 00

03-

Road in Survey No. 11/11/1

12/36

12/29

12/37

12/28

12/41

12/27

12/26

12/24

12/21

12/22 00

68 00

72 00

33 00

73 00

59.-

19 00

06-

Nala in Survey No. 16/19

16/17

16/16

17/3

17/1

17/2

17/5

15/16

15/17

15/19

15/18

5/68

2) Attur WardB

5/67

5/66,

5/60/3

5/60/2

5/60/1

5/57/2

5/57/1

5/54/3

5/54/1 00

25 00

68 00

88 00

28 00

10 00

28 00

01.

22 00

61 00

40 00

13 01 00:

42 00

94 00

00 . 08

52 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25, 1932

5/22 2) Attar WardB ( Contd)

5/21

5/19

5/20/5

5/20/2

5/10

5/12

5/11

5/14

5/6/1

5/4

6/1/1

6/1/8B

6/1 /8A

6/1/10

6/2/1

6/2/2

6/2/3 Taluk: Namakkaj

District: Namakical 1) Pudukombai

Road in Survey No. 2

4/ 1A

4/1B

14/1

15/1A

15/1B

15/2A

15/2B

15/3A

15/3D

17/3A

19/411

19/2B

20/1

139/1

144/5

140/7

140/2

140/3

142/5A

142/5B

142/6

142/7 3

00.

77 00

45 00. : 29

06 09 00

31 00

88 00

09 00

10 00

87 00

79 00

47:

44: 34 00

68 00

00: 00

37 00

29 00

State:T Nadu 00

93 00

05 00

30. 00

34 00 : 18

29 00... 04

24 0010

27 00

01.

00 20 07

54, 00

00 22

28 00

40 98

(00

11 00

00.

16 .

16 00

00 00

00 436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

141/4 1). Padukononi (Comet)

142/8

142/9

161/2

161/1

163/5

163/3

163/1

163/2

164/1

166/1

166/3

166/4

167

173/7

174/2

Road in Survey No. 174/8

173/1

177

176/1

182/3A

Road in Survey No. 182/3B

186

200/1

200/3

199/1B

199/4

199/5

198/1

205

Road in Survey No. 198/2

ク

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii) ]

5 3

65 00

17 00

59 00

30 00

32 00

25 00

-00

54.

State:Tamil Nadu

District: Virudhunagar

-86/1

1 ) Appa

$6/2

85/2

83/2

83/3

83/4A

83/4B

Road in Survey No. 83 /6B

Road in SurveyNo. 83/10B

83/6C

83/9

00.

01.

.00

33 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पीच 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

83/10C 1 ) Appayyanayakkanpatti (Contd)

Nala in SurveyNo. 80

111/3

111/4

111/6

110/1

111/7

111/10

111/12

114/6

114/7

119/1

Nala in Survey No. 114/5

Nala in Survey No. 117/8

117/7

117/6B

117/5 Taluk: Sattur

District:Virudhunagar

170 1) SinduvampattiBit-1

171/1

171/3

District: Madural Taluk: Tirumangalam

9/2B 1) Vannankulam

9/4A

9/4B

14/2 2) Urappanur

14/1

14/5

14/6

15/2

21/ 1A

21/1B

15/13B

21/1C

21/1D

21/2

21/4

21/10.

Nala in Survey No. 16

17/4D

17/6

17/7

17/8 3GI/11-14

67 00

04 35.

00.

27 00

11:

45 00

60 00

35.

14 00

21 00

30 00

10 00

39 00

11.

52 00

56 00

32 00

39 State: Ta

06 00

70 00

31 00

14 00

07 48 00-

81 0009

02 02

82 00.

04 70 00

00..

75 00

-00

06: 50 438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 Urappanur (Contid)

17/ 1E

18/3B

18/4

196

195/ 1A1A

195/ 1A1B

195/ 1A2

195/2

195/3

195/4A

199/4A

199/10

199/11

199/12

199/4B

199/7

199/13

199/14

199/15

199/9

200

203

202

207

206/4A

206/3A1

206/3A2

206/3B

208/2A

208/ 1A1

208/4

208/1A2

208/9A

208/9B

208/9C

208/9D

208/9E

212/ ICI

212/2A

212/2B

212/ 5A

212/ 5B

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii ) ]

-5 3

65 00

14 00

64 00

42 00

22. 00

19 00

.04.

12 00

94. 00

02.

51 00

77 00

03 02

60 भाग - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पी 25,1932

-212/5C 2) Umppanur (Coned)

212/5D

211/2A2

211/3

211/4

2/1A1 3) Sathankudi

2/ 1B1

2/ 1A2

2/1B2

2/1C1

2/102

2/3

19/1A

19/12

19/2

Nala in Survey No. 19/3

19/5A

19/5C

19/5D

22/1A

22/ 1B

22/5

17/6

22/6A

17/8B2

17/10C

16/3A2

16/3B

16/3C2

16/4A

Nala in Survey No. 16/4B

15/4C

25/3A1

28 00

09 00

30 00

28 00

13 00

10 00 02

67 00

00 17 37 00

00.

65 00

37.

62 00

06 00.

85 00

72 00

96 00

20 00 00

000

79 00

60 00

72 00

24 50

37 00

38 00

Nala in SurveyNo. 25/3A2

Nalain SurveyNo 25/3B2

25/3B1

25/6A

25/6B

27/78

96 00

19 00

68 00

02 65 10

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 3)

Nala in Survey No .28

27/8B

30/2A

32/4

32/11

32/8

34/1A

Road in Survey No. 130/1

131/2B1

Nala in Survey No. 131 /2B2

Nala in Survey No. 132/3A

131/4A

131/4B

Nala in Survey No. 132/3B

132/3C

133/2B

142/1

150/3

Nala in Survey No. 151/2 .

151/5

149/2A

149/2B

152

153/3A

153/1

153/2

153/7A

159/1B

159/3

159/4

274/2 4

) Kalligudi

274/3A

274/3B

274/3C

274/4

274/7A

273/2A

273/2B

273 /3B

273/3C

[Part II-Sec. 3( il)] 3

5 00

28 00

52 00

50 00

47 00

69 00

18 00

40 00

24 00

99 00

49 00

34 00

01.

.51.

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932.

269/1B 4) Kalligudi ( Contd)

269/2

269/3

269/4

269/5

270/1

270/2

271/6

271/7

268/2A

267/1

267/2

267/3

267/5A

266/1

259/1

259/2A

259/2B

261/3B

261/4

261/5D

260/2

260/3

9/2A

9/2B1

9/2B2

9/3B

10/3

11/1A

11 /1B

11/ 1C

11/2

13/3

12/4

12/5

12/6

22/1, Taluk: Vadipatti

30 00

81 00-

90 00

06 00

52 00

37 00

45 00

50 00

00.

12-

20 00

49 00

44 00

03 00

73 00

45 00

05 16 00

20 83

58 00

00 13 58 00

01 00

16.

26 00

36 Stab

District:Madurai

54 1) Ayenthenkarai

53/5B2

5342A

53/5A1 00

14 00

31 442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 (Conid)

53/1A

53/1B

53/5A2

53/2B

53/3 .

53/4.

Nala in Survey No.56

49/1

48/1A

48/1B

89/2

Nala in Survey.No.88

87/1

61/2

Nala in Survey No. 85.

67/2

67/3

68/4

82/1A

82/ 1B

82/2A1

82/2A2

82/2B

80/1

80/2

80/3

80/4

74/1

75/2

-73/2

352/1

351

350/1

350/2

349/2A

349/2B

349/1

349/4

348/1

343/1

Nala in SurveyNo. 357

339/3

[Part II-Sec. 3(id)] 3

5 00

3.1

13.

87 01

58 26

64 00

09 00

07 00

46 00

54 00

85 00

43 00

11 00

19 00 भारत का एचपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पर 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

339/5

1) Ayenthenkarai ( Contd)

339/6

-05

338

339/7

339/4

0008

Nala in Survey No. 518

373

23 38

372/1

372/2

374

00.. 20

527

02 82

375

528

[F. No. L-14014/114/2010-G.P.J KK. SHARMA, Under Secy,

नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2011

का. आ. 164.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के. पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ. 1495, तारीख 04 जून, 2010 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मेसर्स रिलीजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा वासुदेवपुर-हावडा गैस पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और , उक्त. राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 29 अक्तूबर, 2010 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दीगई थीं ;

और, पाइपलाइन विखाने के संबंधमें , जनता की ओर से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है ;

और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और , भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः , अव, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह , घोपप्पा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और , भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

तहसिल/ तालुक नन्दिगामा

मंडल/

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला :श्रीकाकुलम

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे सं/ सब डिविजन सं.

167/6

जदीवादा

167/7

167/8-

167/9

167/10

167/11

167/12

167/13

166/10

166/11

166/13वी

166/14

166/15

166/17

165/1

165/6

165/7

142

145/1

145/2

145/3

145/4

145/8

146

149/1

149/2

149/4

149/5

149/6

149/9

149/10

150/1ए

150/1वी

150/3

152/1

152/5

152/6

आर.ओ.यू.अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेतफल

हेक्टेयर एयर सिएयर

00 14

00 05

17.

00 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पोष 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

152/8 1 ) जंदीयादा (निरंतर)

153

154

131/7-

128/3

128/7

127/1

127/2

13/1 2 ) कासीमजी कासीपुरम

13/2

12/11

12/12

12/ 5वी

12/2

12/3

12/4

11/11 वीं

11/11 ए

11/7

11/8

11/10

11/3

11/2वी

11/2सी

11/2ए

20/3

20/2

20/1 ए

20/1बी

21/6वी

21/80

21/50

21/5वी

21/7

21/8

21/9

21/3

21/1बी

23/11

23/9

23/10 3GI/11-15

27 00- 11

41 00

00 17.

43 00 14

00 12.

07 00

02 30 00

00 01 40

96 00 07

07 00

00 00 08

17.

00 10

00 02

00 10

10 00 01

69 00 03

00 03

99 00

54 00 20

00 01

30 00.04

23 00. 01

01 00 09.

00 10.

00 03

00 02 446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

23/3

2 ) कासीमजी कासीपुरम (निरंतर)

23/4

23/5

23/2

23/1.

24/4

24/3

24/2

24/7

24/1

24/8

26/10

26/3

26/9

26/4

26/8.

26/7

26/6

26/5

29/5

29/1

29/2

29/3

मंडल/ तेवधिल/ तालुक : पलानी

जिला:श्रीकाकुलम टेक्कलिफ्टनस

56/8

56/7

56/9

56/11

55/2.

54/8ए

54/9

54/8वी

54/10

54/5

54/3जी

64/6

64/50

64/4ए

64/5वी

64/4वी

64/3

64/2

63/10

[Part I-Sec . 3( i))

00 08

00 13

02-

25.

13.

00 02

00 02: 62

राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश

-00

00 01

00 16

.00

00 01

00 03

00 04

00 08

00 07

80 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 / 25, 1932

[भाग II-खण्ड3 (ii) ]

63/9 ) टेक्कलिपटनम (निरंतर)

63/8

63/7

63/6

63/5

63/4भी

63/4वी

63/4ए

63/3

63/2

63/1

62/9ए

62/4

62/3ए

71/1 ए

71/1 बी

71 / 2ए

60/10 2 ) गोपीवल्लभपुरम

60/11

56/1

56/6

58/5

58/10

58/11

58/12

58/13

58/14

58/15

58/16

58/17

71/2

71/3ए

71/3बी

71/5

71/6

71/8

7.1/9ए

7:1/9वी

71/10

71/11ए

71/12 3

DO 02

00 03

91 00 : 06

08 00

81 00

00 01-

43 00

10 00 05

13 00

07 00

20 00

00 01

63 00

12 00

31 00

$3 00

00 26

49 00 00

10 00 . 00

00. 03

39 00 02

62 00 01

10 00 00

76 00

0000

00 03

27 00

53 00 02

14 00 02

69 00

17 00

04.

52 00 02

87 00 00

55 00

06 00

16 00 00 448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 2

71/13 गोपीवल्लभपुरम निरंतर)

71/14

71/15

70/1

70/2

70/3

70/4

70/5

70/6

70/9

70/10

70/11

70/12,

70/13

70/14

70/15

70/16

70/17

70/21

70/22

74/1 ए

508/1बी 3) रेन्टिकोटा

508/6

506

505/1

460/6

460/7

460/8

460/9

460/10

459/1

459/30

459/3खी

456/1

456/2

455

545/9ए रामकृष्णपुरम

545/9वी

545/10

545/11

545/13

546/1

[Part II Sec . 3(ii) ] 3

00 00

00 02

00 08

46 भारत को हराकपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 पौन 25, 1932

546/5 ) रामकृष्णपुरण (निरंतर)

546/6

546/7

544

543

538/1ए

538/1बी

538/1 /सी

538/2

538/3

538/4

538/1.00

538/11 ए

538/11बी

538/12

539/2

539/4सी

539/5

539/6

539/7

539/8

539/9

539/10मी

533/28

532/1

532/2ए

532/ 2बी

532/30

532/3वी

532/4

532/5

532/6

532/7

532/8

532/9

532/10

532/41

532/120

532/12वी

532/13

532/14

532/15 00

00 01

19 00 02.

56 00

00 04

20 00 07

22 00 01

71 00

72 00

00 01

05 00

01.

27 00:03

60 00 00

16 00

10 00

21-

17 00 00

75- 00

30 00

12 00 02

95 00

86 00

46 03

00 03

58 00 00

33 00 00

92 00

09 00

01 02

02 00 02.

47 450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY-15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

532/16 रामकृष्णपुरम (निरंतर)

532/17

532/18ए

532/19ए

527/1 ड़ी

527/1 ई

527/30

527/3वी

527/4

527/13

527/14

527/15

527/18ए

527/18वी

527/19

527/20

527/230

527/ 23वी

528/1

528/2

528/3

528/4

528/5

528/100

528/10बी

528/11

528/14

528/16

518/22

518/23

518/24

518/25

518/26 कोन्द्रगडा

31-

32/3

32/10

32/11

32/12

32/13

32/14

28/1

28/2

[Part II-Sec. 3(H)] 4

00 08

39-

00 : 06

00 02

00 10.

24.

00 02'

09.

00,

00 02

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 / 25, 1932

28/7 5 ) कोन्द्रगडा (निरंतर)

28/8

28/9

28/10

27/1-

27/2

27/5

27/6

27/7

27/8

27/9

27/11

27/12

27/13

27/14

26/1

26/2

26/3

-26/4

26/5

26/6

26/7

19/13

19/14

19/15

19/17

18/1

18/9

18/10

18/11

17/1

17/2

1773

17/5

17/7

16/1

16/2

16/3

16/10

16/11

15/1

15/15 00 02

-00

-00 04

00 07

00 11

19 00

00 62

81 00 07

00 03

65 00

09 00 10.

59 00 00

10 00 15

85 00 05

38 00

41 00

49. 00

54 00

29 00 06

38 00

10 00

59 07

00 08

08 00 07

44 00

56 01

97 18

47 00

1000

00 01

78 12

74 452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

12/1 5 ) कोन्ट्रगडा (निरंतर)

12/2

12/3

12/4

12/6

12/7

12/8

10/4

1076

10/7

10/8

10/9

10/10

9/13

9/15

6/7

6/12

6/13

6/14

64/10

64/11

567/4

566/1 .

566/2ए

566/ 2/বী

566/3

566/4

566/5

588/ 2सी

568/ 2डी

588/ 2जी

568/7

568/8

568/9-

568/10

568/11

568/13

568/14

569

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ) 3

26 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पर 25, 1932

34/3 7 ) कमलापुरम

34/4ए

34/50

34/5वी

35/1ए

35/1वी

37/1

37/3

37/4

37/5

37/6

37/7

37/8

37/12

37/13

37/14

37/15

38/1

38/2

38/5

38/6

38/8

38/9

38/11

38/12

38/13

39/1

39/2

39/3

39/4

39/6

39/7

39/17

39/18

39/19

38/14

40/3

40/4

40/5

40/6 3G/11-16

00 23

00.

38 00

54 00 01

00 00 00

10 00

59 ,00 02

00.

00 01

00 04

0000

23 00

30 00

13 00 07

10 00

00 07

26.

02 00 00

50 00

99. 00 01

17 00 08

29 00

71 00

00 00

15 00 01

00 03

67 00. 02

00 04

29 00

43 05 454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

40/7

7 ) कमलापुरम (निरंतर)

40/9

40/12

40/13.

40/14

40/15

40/23 मंडल तेहसिल ताम्मुक-४ मेलियायुद्ध

जिला:श्रीकाकुलम

मुरिकुन्टिभद्रा

14/4

-23

28/2

28/1

30/3

१ ) मरीपाड्डु

30/2

30/1

33/1

32/14

32/13

32/15

32/12

32/11

32/10

32/8

32/9पी

32/7

32/5वी

32/4

32/3

32/ 2पी

32/1

32/18

31/1पी

31/2

31/3

24/7

24/2

24/4

24/1पी

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

15 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

25/4 2 ) मरौपाडु (निरंतर)

25/3

25/2

25/1

26/4

26/6पी

26/5

26/3

26/2प्री

26/1पी

7/14पी

7/13

7/12पी

7/10

7/6

7/5

7/4

8/15

8/16

8/9

8/8पी

8/5

8/17

9/8पी

9/9वी

9/10

9/11पी

9/12

10/4

10/2

10/5

10/1

13/3

13/4पी

13/5पी

559/1 3) करजाडा

559/2

559/3

559/4

559/8

559/10 00 07

00 04

57 00

10 00 04

84 00 02

31 00

22 00

20 00

00 00

29 00

47.

00 01

62 00

00 03

69 00 04

47 00

32 00

-00 19

96 00

93 00

95 00

91 00 03

88 00

05 00 07

00 04

77 00 07

00 01

74 00 03

10 00

00 456

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( i ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011/PAUSA 25, 1932

559/11 करजांडा (निरंतर)

558/1

558/2

558/3

558/4

550/6

550/5

549/6

549/5

550/3

560/2

551

536/6

536/9

536/8

536/7

528/14

528/15

528/20

528/16

528/17

528/18

524/32

524/31

524/33

524/34

524/29

524/35

524/37

524/36

524/28

524/27

524/26

524/25

524/24

524/22

520/2

520/4

520/3

520/1

389/8

389/16 3

00 05

00 07

00 11

00 05

00.

'00 00

00 03

, 01

45...

00 04

00 00

92.

12.

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

भारत का सथपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

389/15 3) करजाडा (निरंतर)

389/14

389/9

389/13

389/12

-389/11

389/10

388

387/2

387/3

387/1

386/8

386/7

386/1

395/2

395/1

399/1

399/2

398/2

398/3

398/4

398/5

400/4

400/3

400/2

401/7

401/8

401/9

401/10

401/15

401/14

401/13

401/12

401/11

402/3

402/2

404/3

404/4

404/5

406

408/1

408/2 00 01

71 00

15 00 06

16 00 04

26 00 07

35 00 04

78 00 02

90 00

29 00

51 00

83 00

10 00 00.

85 00 08

00 04

54 00 03

27 00

02 19

00 07

53 00 00

25 458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

408/3 3) करजाडा (निरंतर)

407/3

337/3

338/32

338/31

338/29

337/1

338/28

337/2

336/3

336/4

336/2

308/3

308/4

307/5

307/7

307/6

30.2/1

304/5

302/2

267/7

267/6

267/8

268/3

268/2

268/1

265/2.

264/1

269/3

269/1

264/2

263/2-

263/1

261/8

261/5

269/2

275/3

275/2

261/4

31/5

31/6

30/1

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

00 01

00 06

00 09

00 00

11 、

00 07

55 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पीन 25, 1932

30/2 3 ) करजाडा (निरंतर)

29/2

36/1

36/2

36/3

27/1

26/2

26/1

25/1

37/2

24/3

24/1

24/2

21/11

21/6

21/7

21/5

19/28

19/26

19/22

19/25

19/24

19/14

19/15

19/13

19/12

19/10

19/11

19/7

19/6

1/20

1/19

1/10

1/9

1/8

1/7

1/6

1/5

1/4

176/8 4 ) गोप्पिली

176/7

177/2

177/1

178/3

178/2

173/4

173/3

173/2

174/1

173/1

136/15

136/14 00 00

23 00 07

00 09

61 00 08

71 00

00 01

46 00 19

21 00 11

34 00 03

01 00 15

33 00 23

31 00 08

00. 11

95 00 10

1 00

00 30

40 00. 06

99 00 19

00 00

33 00

83 00

39 00

97 00

76 00

06.

48 00

00 19

84 01

35 00

12 00

14 00 01

30 00 08

48 00

62 0002

39 00

10 00

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

135/21

मोप्पिनी (निरंतर)

135/19

135/20

135/18

135/17

135/16

135/15

1 135/10

135/9

135/8

135/7

135/4

135/3

135/2

134/36

134/40

134/41

134/18

134/13

134/20

134/12

134/11

134/10

[Part II Sec . 3 ( 日 ) ] 3

00 02

00 .

91-

-00

36、

फा सं. एल. - 14014/35/2010-जी.पी. ] के.के .शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th January, 2011

S.O. 164-Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number SO.. 1495 dated 04th June , 2010, issued under sub- section ( 1) of Section 3 of the. Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada -Basudebpur - Howrah gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited byM/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;

Andwhereas, the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 29th October,2010;

Andwhereas, no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline ;

And whereas, the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Government of India;

Andwhereas , Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of ladia hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

[ भाम II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का रामपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/25, 1932

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the Government of India hereby directs that the Right of Usar in the said hand for blog pipeline shall, instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of declaration, in M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, free from all oncumbrances .

Schedule

fiskulam

District:

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Nandigama

Village

SurveyNo./Sub-DivisionNo.

2 1

167/6 1 ) Jaddiyada

167/7

167/8

167/9

167/14

167/11

167/12

167/13

166/10

166/11

166/13B

166/14

166/15

166/17

165/1

165/6

165/7

142

145/1

145/2

145/3

145/4/

145/8

146

149/1

149/2

149/4

149/5

149/6

149/9

149/10

150/1A

150/ 1B

150/3

152/1

152/5

152/6 Ares to

Hac

75 00

09 00.

05 00

93 00

61 3

00: 01

31 00

05 35

89 00

75 :00:

69 ,00

40 00

: 00

27:

: 00

15 00

31 00

10 00 462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 Jaddiyada (Coned)

152/8

153 *

154

131/7

128/3

128/7

127/1

127/2 2

13/1

Kasimji Kasipuram

13/2

12/11

12/12

12/5B

12/2

12/3

12/4

11/11B

11/11A-

11/8

11/10

11/3

11/2B

11/2C

11/2A

20/3

20/2

20/1A

20/1B

21/6B

21/6A

21 /5A

21/5B

21/7

21/8

21/9

21/3

21/1B

23/11

23/9

23/10

[Part II Sec. 3( ii) ] 3

5 00

00-

00 .

53 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष 25, 1932

23/3 2) Kasimji Kasipuram ( Contd)

23/4

23/5

23/2

23/1

24/4

24/3

24/2

24/7

24/1

24/8

26/10

26/3

26/9

26/4

26/8

26/7

26/6

26/5

29/5

29/1

29/2

29/3 Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Palasa

District: Selkakulam

56/8 1 ) Tekkalipatnam

56/7

56/9

56/11

55/2

54/8A

54/9

54/8B

54/10

54/5

54/3B

64/6

64/5A

64/4A

64/5B

64/4B

64/3

64/2

63/10 3

00 02

13 00

96 00

72 00

47 00

25 00

60 00

13-

14 00

42 00

62 00

10 00

18.

90 00

37 00

PRADE 00

21 00

61 00

35 00

89 00

30 00

06 00

22 00

43 00 03

91. 00 .. 08

80 00

07 464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

63/9

63/8

63/7

63/6

63/5

63/4C

63/4B

63/4A

63/3

63/2

63/1

62/9A

62/4

62/3A

71/1A

71/1B

71/2A

60/10 2 ) Gopivallabhapuram

60/11

56/1

56/6

58/5

58/10

58/11

58/12

58/13

58/14

58/15

58/16

58/17

71/2

71/3A

71/3B

71/5

-71/6

71/8

71/9A

71/9B

71/10

71/ 11A

71/12

[Part IISec. 3( ii )]

5 3

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजमंत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौत्र 25, 1932

2) Gopivallabhapuram (Contd)

71/13

71/14

71/15

70/1

70/2

70/3

70/4

70/5

70/6

70/9

70/10

70/11

70/12

70/13

.70/14

70/15

70/16

70/17

70/21

70/22

74/1A

508/18 3 ) Rentikota

508/6

506

505/1

460/6

460/7

460/8

460/9

460/10

459/1

459/3A

459/3B

456/1

456/2

455

545/9A 4 ) Ramkrishnapuram

545/9B.

545/10

545/11

545/13

546/1 3

00′

09 00

43 00- 00

24 00

10 00

67 00

84 00 .

73 00

62 00

74 00

30 00

03 00

73 00

79 00

59 00

64 00

00.

00-

69 00

18 00

61 00

10 00 00

69 00

53 00

70. 00

00 466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

546/5 4) Ramkrishnaparam (Consd)

546/6

546/7

544

543

538/1A

538/1B

538/1/C

538/2

538/3

538/4

538/10A

538/11A

538/11B

538/12

539/2

539/4C

539/5

-539/6

539/7

539/8

539/9

539/10C

533/28

532/1

532/2A

532/2B

532/3A

532/3B

532/4

532/5

532/6

532/7

532/8

532/9

532/10

532/11

532/ 12A

532/12B

532/13

532/14

532/15,

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ]

5 3

68 00

86 :

83.

00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

4) Ramkrishnapuram (Conti)

532/16

532/17

532/18A

532/19A

527/1D

527/1E

527/3A

527/3B

527/4

527/13

527/14

527/15

527/18A

527/18B

527/19

527/20

527/23A

527/23B

528/1

528/2

528/3

528/4

528/5

528/ 10A

528/10B

528/11

528/14

528/16

518/22

518/23

518/24

518/25

518/26

31 5 ) Kondragada

32/3

32/10

32/11

32/12

32/13

32/14

28/1

28/2 3

10 00

57 00

40 00

66 00

10 00

44 00

17 00

00 03

06 0001

60. 00

36 00

38 00- 00

59 00

75 00

44 00

10.

24 00

30 00

63 00

60 00

56 00

82 00: 03

69 00

86 00

11.

=00

99 00

19.

33 468

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

28/7

28/8

28/9

28/10

27/1

27/2

27/5

27/6

27/7

27/8

27/9

27/11

27/12

27/13

27/14

26/1

26/2

26/3

26/4

26/5

26/6

26/7

19/13

19/14

19/15

19/17

18/1

18/9

18/10

18/11

17/1

17/2

17/3

17/5

17/7

16/1

16/2

16/3

16/10

16/11

15/1

15/15

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii ) ]

5 3

74 12/1 5) Kondragada (Copsd)

12/2

12/3

12/4

12/6

12/7

-12/8

10/4

10/6

10/7

10/8

10/9

10/10

9/13.

9/15

6/17

6/12

6/13

6/14

64/10

64/11.

567/4 6 ) Peddanahala

566/1

566/2A

566/2/B

566/3

566/4

566/5

568/20

568/2D

568/2G

568/7

568/8

568/9

568/10

568/11

568/13

568/14

569 3G/11-18

30 00

44 00

71 00

23 00_

050 90 00

66 00

-04

-00

36 00

10%

87 00 05

0000

64 00

00.

00- 06 2.14

79 3

98 00

05 00

96 00

78 00

25:

99 00

26 00

49 00

00-

78 00

89 00

00.

79 00

86 00 : 10

92 00

00 470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

34/3

34/4A

34/5A

34/5B

35/ 1A

35/1B

37/1

37/3

37/4

37/5

37/6

37/7

37/8

37/12

37/13

37/14

37/15 1

38/1

38/2

38/5

38/6

38/8

38/9

38/11

38/12

38/13.

39/1

39/2

39/3

39/4

39/6

39/7

39/17

39/18

39/19

38/14

40/3

40/4

40/5

40/6

[Part II ---Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

00 :

43 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15 , 2011 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(i )]

40/7

7) Kamalapuram (Coned)

40/9

40/12

40/13

40/14

40/15

40/23

Distric Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Mellaputti

1) Murikuntibhadra

14/4

28/2

28/1

30/3 2 ) Marripadu

30/2

30/1

33/1

32/14

32/13

32/15

32/12

32/11

32/10

32/8

32/9P

32/7

32/ 5P

32/4

32/3

32/2P

32/1

32/18

31/1P

31/2

31/3

24/7.

24/2

24/4

24/1P 25, 1932

00.

15 472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 2 Marripada (Contd).

25/4

25/3

25/2

25/1

26/4

26/ 6P

26/5

26/3

26/2P

26/ 1P

7/14P

7/13

7 / 12P

7/10

7/6

7/5

7/4

8/15

8/16

8/9

8/8P

8/5

8/17

9/8P

9/9P

9/10

9/ 11P

9/12

10/4

10/2

10/5

10/1

13/3

13/4P

13/5P

559/1 3 ) Karajada

559/2

559/3

559/4

559/8

559/10

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

00 04

1,6

02.

05.

38 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौत्र 25 , 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

559/14 3) Karajada (Contd)

558/1

558/2

558/3

558/4

550/6

550/5

549/6

549/5.

550/3

550/2

551

536/6

536/9

536/8

536/7

528/14

528/15

528/20

528/16

528/17

528/18

524/32

524/31

524/33

524/34

524/29

524/35 /

524/37

524/36

524/28

524/27

524/26

524/25

524/24

524/22

520/2

520/4

520/3

520/1

389/8

389/16 3

53 00

33 00

00.

38-

51 00

99 00

05 00

-00

00/

00.

50 00

25 00 07

55 00

93 00

33 00

75 00

95 00

89 00

94.

45 00

04. 7.61

91. 00

30 00

48 00

92 00

97 00

89 474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 (Copt)

389/15

389/14

389/9

389/13

389/12

389/11

389/10

388

387/2

387/3

387/1

386/8

386/7

386/1

395/2

395/1

399/1

399/2

398/2

398/3

398/4

398/5

400/4

400/3

400/2

401/7

401/8

401/9

401/10

401/15

401/14

401/13

401/12

401/11

402/3

402/2

404/3

404/4

404/5

406

408/1

408/2

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

41.

- 42

-00

00'

00.

00-

25 15, 2011/पत्र 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र

408/3 3) Karajada (Conid)

407/3

337/3

338/32

338/31

338/29

337/1

338/28

337/2

336/3

336/4

336/2

308/3

308/4

307/5

307/7

307/6

302/1

304/5

302/2

267/7

267/6

267/8

268/3

268/2

268/1

265/2

264/1

269/3

269/1

264/2

263/2

263/1

261/8

261/5

269/2

275/3

275/2

261/4

31/5

31/6

30/1

15.

00.

03 00 80

51 00

19 00

23 00

73 00

01:

20 00

77 00

36 00

02.

02 00

42. 00

61 00

10 00 0001

51 00

55 00

07.

476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 Karajada (Cord)

30/2

29/2

36/1

36/2

36/3

27/1

26/2

26/1

25/1

37/2

24/3

24/1

24/2

21/11

21/6

21/7

21/5

19/28

19/26

19/22

19/25

19/24

19/14

19/15

19/13

19/12

19/10

19/11

19/7

19/6

1/20

1/19

1/10

1/9

1/8

1/7

1/6

1/5

1/4

176/8 Goppili

176/7 177/2

177/1

178/3

178/2

173/4

173/3

173/2

174/1

173/1

136/15

136/14

136/13

135/21 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

11 :

31.

55-

01- 55

00'

92 भारते का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 / 25, 1962

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

135/19

4 ) Goppili (Contd)

135/20

135/18

135/17

135/16

135/15

135/10

135/9

135/8

135/7

135/4

135/3

135/2

134/36

134/40

134/41

134/18

134/13

134/20

134/12

134/11

134/10

नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी 201

का. आ. 165. भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत हो प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा - असुदेत्पुर

और , भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अ अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः, अब, भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमिन में उपचार के अधिकार का अर्थन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों याद करते हुएफ, उबर्ष उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करतीहै;

करत अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा भी जाती हैं, इवित्र दिन के भीतर के संबंध में श्री भास्कर त्रिपाठी, सदान कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितवन्द्ध है, उस तारीख से विधान (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपायोग के अधिकार के र प्राधिकारी, रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड, प्रथम मंजिल , मोहर सरकारपुर ओडिशा राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।. 751023, 30/11-19 478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)]

अनुसूची

जिला:कटक

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक टंगी चौडवार

सर्वे सं / सब डिविजन सं.

1456

करंजी

1457

1476

1475

1474

1473

1472

1471

1469

1470

1499.

1503

1546

1504

1542

1505

1541

نیر

1539

1538

1540

1537

1536

1535

1560

1558

1559

1577

1578

1571

1574

2205

2206

1589

1590

1592

1586

1585

राज्य: ओडिशा

आर.ओ.यूअर्जित करने केलिए क्षेत्रफल

एयर सि एयर हेक्टेयर

67 05

83 21

00 12

54 00 22

26 00 02

67 00 03

96 00 24

00 06

51 00

21 14

30 00

00 13

57 06

55 00 08

38 00 04

54 00. 06

00 08

84 00 02.

70 06

51 00

56 05

30 06

.90 00

73 18

40 00 04

19 09

18 00

00 04

77 00

21 21

62 00 33

48 00

00 02

99 02

-00

86 00 10

68 00 04

55 00

4.8 00 02

08 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ] .

1594 1) करंजी (निरंतर)

1595

1596

1584

1583

380

1597

379

385

384,

388

386

387

389

390

375

397

417

416

418

421

420

422

426

361

360

359

269

270

268

263

262 .

1970

392

294

296

2.95

297

1876

298

1877

07 00 12

00-

94.

42 0000

09 36 00

12 56 00

03 0000

30 00 04 53

99 00

06 .

49 0001

95 0000 99 00 1458

00.

82 00 06

0000 10

82 00

09 00 03

21 00 06

10 00

07 0044

00 38 00

00. 01

30 00 00

51 00.

00 02

60 00:

10 0000 INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

300

299

301

2011

167

305

160

154

159

161

158

162

163

157

156

151

1904

1956

152

1910

150

148-

147

1955

146

149

145

12.6

125

129

128

127

मंडल

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 3

00 12

70 00 00

94 00 00

26 00 08

42 00 08

11 00 00

10 00 06 90 00

00 00

97 00

00 02 56 00 03

86 00 04

15 00 02

40 00 00

15 00 04

85 00

00 06

38 00 00

45 00

00 00

72 00

00 06

91 00 01

10 00 24

12 00 00

10 00 04

56 00 ' 01 89 00

56 -00 00

10 00 01

13 00 08

जिला:कटक

328

329

330

331

332

335

336

338

339

राज्य ओडिशा

32 00 14

7,1 00 06

70 00 02

67 00 02

42 00 04

86 00 05

57 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2011 / 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

2 1

340

1) ब्रहमना बस्ता (निरंतर)

342

343

319

31.6

309

308

301

295

294

293

289

283

281

279

280

277

268

265

262

916

422

873

874

424.

876

425 3

63 0006

00 05 93

26 15

18. 77 00

35 06

07 0015

46 0011

11 0000

02 06

29 0000

65.

02 31 00

93 00. 14

55 0001

04 69 00

001113

34 00 05

सर्वे से 425 और 426 के वीच में

426

430

427

429

428

478

476

477

908

852

474

953

482

88 0002

68 0013

-00-

51 00:05

43 0023

79 00.00

00 482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932.

2 1) ग्रहगमा बस्ता (निरंतर)

483

484

468

488

481

494

416

228

775

900

882

693

692

690

932

689

991

219

2) विशनुपुर

220

221

194

217

216

218

186

187

3) सानकावडी

567

168

532

170

171.

211

190

200

554

483

498

497

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 3

00 10

00 12

14 00 18.

05 00.- 04

14 00 . 15

76 00

84 00

09 00

54 00 16

66 00 09

04 00

64 00 08

66 00

88 00

2-8

53 00

23 00 05

95 00 00

31 00 01

24 00 08

49 00 18

53 00 45

45 '00 -0.6

00 12 09 00 00

00 05

85, 00 00

00 02

26.

00 48.

00 00

00 02

64- 00

85 भारत का राजपत्रः जनवरी 15 2011/ पौष 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (日) ]

516

4) वामनपुर (निरंतर. )

496

495

494

493

492

347

463

478

477

476

-53,

348

472

473

470

जिला जाजपुर मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: धर्मशाला

1517

1) दरकुंडी.

1476

1475

1402

1403

1404

1405

1401

1427

1446

1358

00 D7

06 0010

53 96 00

19.

0675 00

08-94 00

29 0002

04 02 00 :

54 00 02

25 0002

45 00 07

00:

21:

66 00

21 0004

78 0009

96 00

राज्य:ओडिशा

42 00 05

70 0001

00 05

66 00. 08

30 00:00 .

31 00-03

00 484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

1357

1448

1356

1360

1355

1361

1354

1353

1352

1362

1363

1350

1335

1337

1347

1348

1346

1,340

1345

1344

1343

1342

1341

741

740.

739

1436

738

72.8

737

729

726

1456

6.27

715

500

2) नसुरपुर

126

125

108

107

106

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00

04 0000

82 00 01

24 00- 02

04 00 03

21 00

90 00

00 00

10 1

00 01

07 00 04

15 00 03

80 00 00

68 00

55 00 07

37. 00 04

02 00

0.0 01

56 00 02

48 00

67 00 01

79 00

12 00

58 00 00 .

87 00

00 01

1.7 00

03 00 07.

22 00

00 00 02

77 00 02

45 00 04

05 00 01 90 00 04

85 00 18

24 00 00

13 00 00

54 00 00

96 00 00

53 00 02

60 नवरी 15, 2011/पोन 25, 1932.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) )

552

2) मकुरपुर (निरंतर)

102

109

498

580

105

551

103

101

104

114

100

536

115

560

जिला इजासपुर मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक कोराय

2911 1) नुआपटणा

2910

2909

2908

1890

1891

1898

1897-

1899

1900

1922

1920

1896

1925

1924

1962

1961

1964

1965

1966

1968 3GI/11-20

000

10 00

00-

10$

10 0000

00% 0001

06 00

21 00:04

राज्य:आडिशा

65 0000

66 00 06

05 00

σο

17.

40 00.03

-22

54 00-09

01 01 00

00 THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 23 , 1932

नुआपटना (निरंतर)

1985

1967

1984

1971

3632

1981

1983

1982

1980

1979

2013

2014

2015

2046

2047

2016

2045

2044

2043

2051

2042

2039

2040

1526

1527

1529

1528

1531

1530

1532

1533

1518

1451

1450

145,2

1454

1448

1457

1376

1375

1374

१ [Part II-Sec . 3( ii)]

00 00

00 04

00 05

00 02

00 09

00 .09

00 00

00 02

00 16

00 00

00 05

00 04

00 01

00 02 27

00 00

00 14

00 10

00 04

00 08 65

00 09 40

00 04 04

00 04

00 01

00 08

00 00

00 03

00 02

00 00

00 04 09

00 18

00 06

00 06 92

00 03

00 07

00 08

00 03

00 05

60 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /ौन 25, 1932

1373 1371

1348 1368 1349 1363 1364 1362 1353 1361 1354 517

1355 1356 516

515

505

506 .

507

508 .

509 3633 500

499 5632 510

5646 565 566 567 568 ,575 572 574 569 571 570 573 598 593 597

45 0000

54 02

05 11

46 00 00

28 00

92 04

94 00.

00 00

00.

07 94 00

0026 00

000073

10 0000

00:

12 00 08 :

26 00 01

77 0005

20.

00-

49 00 01

65 00

09:0 9000

94 00.00

80 0001

67 0000

00 03 224

10 00 0012

74 00 03

39 0002

0.1

00 438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

595

1) नुआपटणा (निरंतर)

599

596

594

588

616

617

618

619

620

621

221

223

220

222

248

229

280

246

282

281

240

241

239

238

237

671

675

676

674

677

210

2) नरपवा

1537

1536.

1535

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)]

00 00

68 00

30 00 06

92 00 00

19 00 04

74 00

72 00

00 06

00 00 02

58 00 00

61 00 08

30 00 00

15 00 03

45 00 01

02 04

11 00 04

95 00 04

46 00

44 00

00 06

00 09 01

15 00

25 00

00 02

82 00

53 09

68 00 09

67 00

60 00

13 01

40 0001

09 00 01

74 00 00

99 10

00 02

95- 00 16

06 00 02

00 05

सर्वे सं 1535 और 1919 के बीच में

1919

1543

1548

1547

1546

25 00 05

00 00

00 05

00 02

74 15. 2011/पौष-25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

1552 2) नरपदा (निरंतर )

1555

1554

1581

1560

1568

1567

1577

1578

1588

1589

1606

1607

1608,

1488

1489

1487 '

1464

1468

14.66

1467

1469

1470

1243

1457

1446

1445

1429

1431

1430

140.6

1271

1404

1405

1403

1272

1402

1390

1389

1273.

1388 3

0006

3 04

23 03

75 00 05

00,

06 40 00

09 13 00

60 0002

54 00 01

02 20 00

03 19 00

00 01

25 00 02

10 00

00 490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 2) नरपवा

1274

1289

1387

1386

1385

1293

1298

1290

1292

1294

1296

1295

1291

1299

675

1287

1286

676

712.

677

678

679

711

718

710

719

724

723

721

726

729

741

740

739

738

742

753

752

754

755

758

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

00 04

36 00 00

45 00 03

56 00 01

81 00 00

72 00 02

45 00 00

71 00 00

27 00 01

72 00 00

96 00 01

62 00 01

37 00 00

99 00 00

10 00 05

76 00 08

84 00 00

84 00 02

89 00 00

58 00 02

66 00- 01. 81

00 00

00 09

00 03

00 00

00 10

00 00

00 07

00. 00

00 02

00 03 05

00 00

00 04

00 00

1.6

00 06

00 00

00 07

00 00

15 भारत का समचत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 / भी 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) 】

766 2) नरपदा (निरंतर )

7.65

764

762

763

7.61

760

759

767

786

651

788

650

394

395

396

397

393

387

386

385

384

383

323

246

247

279

280

283

284

299

298

285

297

288

296

292

289

291

293

290 3

82 00

07 00

49 01

01 37 00

42 00

91 00 01

10 0000

69 00 05

21 02

79 0005

28 76 00

05:

07:

60.

07 80, 00

14 00 03

23 82 00

05 09 00

00.

96 00 05

49 00.00

51 00.

12 00

03.

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 188

189

228

227

226

192

225

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

00 00

14 00 03

43 00

30 00 05

29 00

35 00

28 00

16 224

223

213

212

211

214

210

209

216

315

316

430

398

396'

397

393

395

394

389.

390

392

391

497

498

388

387

386

385

382

383

384

378

377

500

00 03

22 00 10

96 00 05

62 00

81 00- 01

93 00

34 00

65 00

99 00 00

20 10

22 00 00

10 00

16 00

21 00 00

95 00 . 00

69 00

10 00

48 00 01

34 00

72 00 01

48 00 00 -76 00

76 00

00 . 27 00

78 00

06 00

00 00

78 00 00

80 00 00

18 00

78 00

78 00 00

10 00 00

86. 00

53 06 499 3) मोहमद जमलपुर (निरंतर)

501

543

544

542

540

541,

597

536

598

535

599

607

603

617

611

625

727

720

714

713

712

628

710

721

723

724

725

7.26

731

732

733

734

730

735

736

738

737

666

1083

1085 30 /11-21

00 -00

27 00 01

: 00

36 00 06

70 00 01 08 00. 09 25

0.2

47 700

00 00 59 00

10 0000

00 31 00

00 07- 84 00 06 02

04.0

00 05- 39

53 0000

20 00 00

00 02

32 0011

10 0000

00 00

62 00 01

07 00 01 96 00

09.

16 00

51 00

44 00

80 0002

00 02 39

01 00 29

4 00 07

00 00

40 00 05 494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 4) धनापुर

2472

2531

2526

2525

2522

2523

2515

2529

2512

2511

2510

2508

2507

5) पथरपदा

1223

6) ताजपुर

1224

1222

1225

1221

1216

1217

1218

1202

1203

1204

1205

1196

1195

1194

1191

1192

1255

1175

1177

1174

1173

1172

1171

1059

10.60

1162

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

00 00

25 00 02

14 00 23 81 00

09 00 06

50 00

70 03

00 02

60 00

09 00 06

56 00 08 42 00 06

82 00 02

52 01

36 00 05

14 00

68 00 06. 96 00

08 00 04

88 02

00.

12 00

63 00 00

89 00 08

58 00 04

66 00 03

98 00 01

00 01

00 11

00 16

00 02

45 00. 16

00 00

00 02

00 08

00 03

00 00

05 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 20117पौष 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1061

6) ताजपुर (निरंतर)

1057

1056

1038

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1085

1050

1088

1087

1048.

1089

1090

1529

1103

1104

1102

1101

1112

958

572

570

568

569

584

562

491

396

395

397

406

1515

403

401

402

400

399

1514

5 4

72 02

0.0

10 00. 00

197 00

74 01

56 0002

03.

15 26 00

44. 0006

65-

98.

02.

00.

37 0002

28 0001 496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 ताजपुर (निरंतर)

412

413

416

415

417

7) बसागाडिया

391

383

386

384

388

385

387

389

382

381

380

379

393

377

375

373

376

378

370

369

359

358

348:

354

349

350.

287

289

275

274

290.

273

270

560

293

265

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )] 3

5 00

00 00 03

07 00

60 00 05

7.5 00

03 00

54 00 12

65 00 01

78 00 02

41 00 00

20 00 02. 79 00 03

59 00 00

10 00 09

71 00 01

19. 00 10

00 06

00 04

00 09

00 02

00 00

00 04

00 07

25- 00 03

00 33

00 23

00 02

00 03

00 01

00 20

.58

00 02

00 03

00 00

00 05

00 06

00 00

21 भारत का प्रचपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 / 25, 1932

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

264 7) खसागाडिया (निरंतर)

263

262

559

261

260

558

259

561

246

247

249

255

253

254

252

57 8 ) खोसलपुर

487

476

121

122

131

124

132

130-

456

120

128

125.

127

463

7 3

00 01

06 11

00 01

00.

00 04

27.

00 02

00 08 99

00 00 83

0006

00 05

00 06

00, 08

سیت

00 03

06 78

0002

0006 99

00 01

02 52

0001

00 02 40 498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

135

योसलपुर (निरंतर)

137

219

216

217

214

218

313

312

311

473

315

314

317

319

316

309

320

321

4.65-

325

326

332

344

420

345

348

347

2105

9 ) बर्तगणा

2103

2156

2.104

2071

857

10) राणीगोरा

856

855

841

854

853

842

843-

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] 3

17 00

27 00 25

81 00 01

36 00

15 00

10 00 09

2-9 00 01

64 00

27 00 00

10 00 02

15 00 00

10 00

25 00 07.

78 00 09

78 00 00

35 00 .00

10 00

66 0-0 19

57 00 02

59 00

39 00 05- 69 00

72 00 02

64 00

41 00

94 00 04

68 00

04 00 08

66. 00 13

00 00

00 :

00 02

21 00 16

00 01

00 00

00 02

00 01

87 00 00

08 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 45 , 2011 /पाय 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

852

10) राणीगोरा (निरंतर)

844

840

839

755

675

676

672

677

671

670

669

668

666

660

663

665

-664-

652

691

692

651

650

649

597

595

594

2406

558

593

599

591

592

600

553

540

539

538

541

537

536

10 00

04 04

92 00 11

28 05

36 00:14

19 02

10 00.00

50 07

22 0003

34 01

99 07

01 0002

73 03

29 05

11 0010

082

00:

33 00 03

01 04 00

52-

00.

00 500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 10) रानीपोरा (निरंतर)

457

458

2394

535

459

460

461

471

464

462

463

465

466

467

470

468

449

469

448

441

442

443 .

436

431

432

430

429

433

383

366

370

367

368

365

308

307

306

305

302.

303

281

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 3

13 00

08 00 00

10 00 05

00 02

90 00 00

31 00 01

62 00 05

54 00 01

65 00

00 01

00 02

00.00

00 02

00 01

00 02 91

00 05

00 01

00 00

00 04

00 02

00 03

00 . 61

00 02

00 00

00 01

00 00

00 08

00 07

00 00

00 06

69 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) )

211 देपडा

11)

165

207

208

206

167

168

169

202

201

175

200

193

177

189

188

178

187

186

385

184

319

383

382

1149 12) भकंडरी.

1148

1147

1146

1145

1150

1151

1144

1152

1156

1155

1154

1153

1175

1140

1176

1177 3GI/11-22

0006

09 04

42 0001

36 07

83- 0012

0163 00

-00

72 0000

31 0002

53 0001

187

75 0003

24 > 0000

од

-00

00 502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

.2 12) भकंडरी (निरंतर)

1178

1179

1139

1138

1180

1026

1024

1025

1022

1030

1021

1032

1031

1009

1008

1007

970

979

978

981

980

976

975

982

983

984

986

985

989.

883

990

882

881

:880

339

877

340

876

380

381

383

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

00 02

4 00 03

00 09

00 08

00 00

00 06 97

00 22

00 06

00 02

00 07

00 01 10

00 05

00 03

00 04

97.

00 06

00 01

00 04 50

00 02

00 03

00 11.

00 09.

00 04

00 12

00 03

00, 02

00 04

00 19

00:02

39 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011.पौष 25, 1932

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( t) ]

2743 12) (निरंतर)

387

388

389

390

391

2260

992

394

393

गाँव सींमा और सर्वे नं 21 के बीच में

13 ) बाघनदा

: 21:

गाँच सींमा और सर्वे में 649 के बीच में

14) रंगारंगा

649

664

1117

1099

1098

1094

1097

1100

1101

1096

1095

1102

1104

1209

1210

1213

1211

1212

1207

1979

2003

503

70 18

54 00

13 00 10-

21 00 03

25 00 06

74 06-

02 -23 00

00. 01 93 00

83 00

01 98 00

47 01 10

00 00 10

4754 00

28 04

31 03

00 03 52

76 00

147 06

01 0011

72 00 33

96 03

0000

62 01

00.

14 04

83 0002

76 00

17 05

095

19 0011

00 00 10

82 00 08

20 08

99 00

46 00. 02

04 00 31

49 00 18

37 00 00 504

[Part II-Sec. 3(il)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2004

14) रंगारंगा (निरंतर)

2007

2008

2006

2005

2010

2015

2014

2018

2031

2019

2030

2029

2028

2385

2022

2027

2026

2100

2103

2104

2102

2105

2106

2249

2250

2248

2114

2115

2124

2125

2130

2131

2133

2132

2136

2139

2154

2138

2137

2155

14 00 01

73 00

06 44 00

76 00 01

00 97 27

86 00 02

38 00 05

00 07

99 00 01

10 00

06 29 00

00 07

10 00

65 06

46 00 -10

92 00

05 08

69 02

52 02

31 04

00 02

15 00

26 01

00 07

10 00 00

10 00

59 06

43 23

27 00 00

94 00 03 -09 00

78 06

18 00 04.

52 01

00 06

85 05

00:

77 00 06

45 00 03

00 12

70 00 राजपत्र बनी 15 , 2011 / 25 , 1

2156

14) रंगारंगा (निश्तर)

00 07

2157

2201

2200:

80 00

2198

127

15.) श्रीकरपुर

128

00 14

129

121

0002

0004

120

119

0008

115

फीस. एल -14014/113/2010-建 ]

New Delhi, the 11th January, 2011

8. O. 165-Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East cost of Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited to consumers in various parts of the country, Kakinada - Basudebpur - Howrah pipeline should be laid by M/s Relogisties Infrastructure Limited, ade Ad

And whereas, it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of layingying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be JaidTaid andwhich are described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1) ofSection 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri Bhaskar Tripathy, Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, 1st Floor, Fortune Tower, Chandrasekharpur , Bhubaneswar- 751023, Orissa State.

506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

Schedule

District: Cuttack Taheli /Taluk :Tangi- Chowdwar

Mandal

State: Orissa

Area to be acquired for

Survey No./Sub-Division

Village

2 1

1456 1) Karanji

1457

1476

1475

1474

1473

1472

1471

1469

1470

1499

1503

1546

1504

1542

1505

1541

1539

1538

1540

1537

:1536

1535

1960

1558

1559

1577

1578

1571

1574

2205

2206

1589

1590

1592

1586

1585

C-Are Hec

Are

00-

02 08 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

2 1 ) Karariji ( Contd)

1594

1595

1596

1584

1583

380 .

1597

379

385

384.

388-

386

387

389

390

375

397

417

416.

418

421

420

422

426

361.

360

359

269

270

268

263

262.

1970

392

294

296

295

297

1876

298

1877

12.

20 00

94 00

42 00

12.

56 00

12 05 00

60 03 00

00 30 00

66 00

68 00

00.

06 82.

10 00

82 00

86 00

03 55 00.

60:

10 00

07 00

70 00.

10 00

77 00

30 00

76 00..

51 00

89 00

60 00:

10 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

508

300

Katan (Cored)

299

301

2011

167

305

160

154

159

161

158

162

163

157

156

151

1904

1956 .

152

1910

150

148

147

1955

146

149

145

126

125

129

128

127

[Part II-Sec. 3( i))

00.

37.

06 38

56 00

13-

State: Orissa

District: Cuttack

328 Brahm

329

330

331

332

335

336

338

339

98 00

71 00

70 00

67. 00

00 भारत का : जनवरी 15 , 2011 , 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

340 1) Brahmane Besta (Cont

342

343

319

316

309

308

-301

295

294

293

289

283

281

279

280

277

268

265

262

916

422

873

874

424

$76

425

In bet suy no . 425 &426

426

430

427

429

428

478

476

477

908

852

474

953

482 3GI /11-23

18.

46 00

31 00

.00

00 00

10 73 00

13 00

00 00

90 00

13 00

51 00

58 00

79 00

06 510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 (Contd)

483

484

468

488

481

494

416

228

775

900

882

693

692

690

932

689

991

2 Bi

219

220

221

194

217

216

218

186

187

567

168

532

170

171

211

190

200

554

483

498

497

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)] 3

12.

85 भारत

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

516 4) Bamenapur (Contd)-

496

495

494

493

492

347-

463

478

477

476

348

472

473

470

District: japur Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Dharmasala

1517 1) Darkundi.

1476

1475

1402

1403

1404

1405

1401

1427

1446

1358

94 00

08 00 05

00 110

100

13 00

00 01

39 00

00%

30 00 00

00 512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

1357

1448

1356

1360

1355

1361

1354

1353

1352

1362

1363

1350

1335

1337

1347

1348

1346

1340

1345

1344

1343

1342

1341

741

740

739

1436

738

728

737

729

726

1456

627

715

500

126

125

108

107

106

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] 3

ΟΙ

18-

60.

15, 20

भारत का राजपुत्र

[भाग II सखण्ड 3 (it) ]

552

2) Masarpur (Contd)

102

109

498

580

105

551

103

101

104

114

100

536

115

93-

560

Menilei /Tshell/Taluic:Koral

2911 1) Nuapatane

2910

2909

2908

1890

1891

1898

1897

1899

1900

1922

1920

1896.

1925

1924

1962

1961

1964

1965

1966

1968 1932

00 76

07 00

00.

10 00

00%

92 00

03:

-12

여

06.

01.

06 514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

1985

1967

1984-

1971

3632.

1981

1983

1982

1980

1979

2013

2014

2015

2046

2047

2016

2045

2044

2043

2051

2042

2039

2040

1526

1527

1529

1528

1531

1530

1532

1533

1518

1451

1450

1452

1454

1448

1457

1376

1375

1374

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( i) ) 3

00.

-00

00.

109

60 2011

सर्वपत्र:

1373

(Consd)

1371

1348

1368

1349

1363

1364

1362

1353

1361

1354

517

1355

1356

516

515

505

506

507

508

509

3633

500

499

5632

510

5546

565

566

567

568

575

572

574

569'

571

570

573

598

593

597

02-

نمو 00

73 00

67 00

10 00

12.

00 00

21 00 06

00 516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 ana ( Coned)

595

599

596

594

588

616

617

618

619

620 :

621

221

223-

220

248

229

280

246

282

281

240

241

239

238

237

671

675

676

674

677

210

2) Narpada

1537

1536

1535

[Part II Sec. 3( i)] 3

06: 00

02.

45.

00.

01.

Inbet suy no. 1535 & 1919

1919

1543

1548

1547

1546

20.

74 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 11, 2011/पौष 25, 1932

2) Narpide( Contd)

1552

1555

1554

1561

1560

1568

1567

1577

1578

1588

1589-

1606

1607

1608

1488

1489

1487

1464

1468

1466

1467

1469

1470

1243

1457

1446

1445

1429

1431

1430

1406

1271

1404

1405

1403

1272

1402

1390

1389

1273

1388 3GI/11-24

10 00

03 16

9 00

20 00

66 00

19 00

00.

04 00

25 00 62

02 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

1274

1289

1387

1386

1385

1293

1298

1290

1292

1294

1296

1295

1291

1299

675

1287

1286

676

712

677

678

679

711

718

710

719

724

723

721

726

729

741

740

739

738

742

753

752

754

755

758

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

02.

.00

-00

.00

00.

41.

,00

21-

15 Narpada (Contd)

765

764

762

763

761

760

759

767

786

651

788

650

394

395

396

397

1393

387

386

385

384

383

323

246

247

279

280

283

284

299

298

285

297

288

296

292

289

291

293 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

188

189

228

227

226

192.

225

224

223

213

212

A211

214

210

209

216

315

316

430

398

396

397

393

395

394

389

390

392

391

497

498

388

387

386

385

382

383.

384

378

377

500

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] 3

11.

-22

00 .

00 . 78

06.

53 [भाग

499

501-

543

544

542

540

541

597

536

598

535

599

607

603

617

611

625

727

720

714

713

712

628

710

721

723

724

725

726

731

732

733

734

730

735

736

738

737

666

1083

1085 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 2472

2531

2526

2525

2522

2523

2515

2529

2512

2511

2510

2508

2507

1223-

1224

1222

1225

1221

1216

1217

1218

1202

1203

1204

1205

1196

1195

1194

1191

1192

1255

1175

1177

1174

1173

1172

1171

1059

1060

1162

[Part II Soc. 3(in)] 3.

06.

02- 60.

00.

04 66

1.1

95.

02. 45

02 1061 6) Tajapur (Conte

1057

1056

1038

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1085

1050

1088

1087-

1048

1089

1090

1529

1103

1104

1102

1101

1112

958

572

570

568

569

584

362

491

396

395

-397

406

1515

403

401

402

400

399

1514

19 00

70 00 02

86 00

12 00

37 00

32 00

04-

05. 00

03 524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

412

413

416

415

417

391

Khasagaria

383

386

384

388

385

387

389

382

381

380

379

393

377

375

373

376

378

370

369

359

358

348

354

349

350

287

289

275

274

290

273

270

560

293

265

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

02.

00- 03

20.

19 -25

63-

21 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 2011/प्रोप 25 , 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(fi)

264 7) Khasagaria (Contd)

263

262

559

261-

. 260

558

259

561

246-

247

249

255

253

254

252

57 8) Khosalpur

487

476

121

122

131

124

132

130

456

129

128

125

127

463 3G/11-25

37 00

09 00

24 00

04-

00 165 00

05.

99 00

45 00

مرا

00:

00 $26

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

135

137

219

216

217

214

218

313

312

311

473

315

314

317

319

316

309

320

321

465

325

326

332

344

420

345

348

347 9)

2105

2103

2156

2104

2071 0)

857

856

855

841

854

853

842

843

[Part I-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

00.

00 :

.00

00.

08 नवरी 15, 2011 / 25, 1932

(Centd)

852

844

840

839

755

675

676

672

677

671

670

669

668

666

660

663

665

664

652

691

692

651

650

649

597

595

594

2406

558

593

599

591

592

600

553

540

-539

1538

541

537

536

19 00

50 00

22 00 03

99 00

73 00

08 00

14 00

11 00

67 00

37 00

71 00

00 00

04 00

10 00

00 02 40

37 00

00 06

00.

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 457

458

2394

535

459

460

461

471

464

462

463

465.

466

467

470

468

449

469 、

448

441

442

443

436

431

432

430

429

433

383

366

-370

367

368

365

308

307

306

305

302

303

281

[Part II Soc. 3( 1 )] 3

.00

00-

-49

00.

-74

69 भारत का रावंपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पौल 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (1) ]

211 11) Depada

165

207

208

206

167

168

169

202

201

175

200

193

177

189

188

178

187

186

385

184

319

383

382

1149. 12) Bhakandari

1148

1147

1146

1145

1150

1151-

1144

1152

1156

1155

1154

1153

1175

1140

1176,

1177

10 00

12 00

03-

00 02

03 530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 (2). Bhazandari ( Com

1178

1179

1139

1138

1180

1026

1024

1025

-1022

1030

1021

1032

1031

1009

1008

1007

970

979

978

981

980

976

975

982

983

984

986

985

989

883

990-

882

-881

880

339

877

340

876

380

381

383

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii)] 3

02.

79.

22.

05.

00,

: 00

28.

03.

39 नवरी 15, 2011/ 25, 1932

नारत का राजपत्र [भाग - 3(ii) ]

2743 12) Bhakandari (Conel)

387

388

389

-390

391

2260

992

394

393

In bet VB & suy no. 21 13) Baghanata

Nala Bet VB & Suy no. 649

14) Rangaranga

649

664

1117

1099

1098

1094

1097

1100

1101

1096

1095

1102

1104

1209

1210

1213

1211

1212

1207

1979

2003 00

21 00

00 06

74 00 06

02 23

11.

07-

00 532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 14 ) Rangaranga (Conid

2004

2007

2008

2006

+2005

2010

2015

2014

2018

2031

2019

2030

2029

2028

2385

2022

2027

2026

2100

2103

2104

2102

2105

2106

2249

2250

2248

2114

2115

21:24

2125

2130

2131

2133

2132

2136

2139

2154

2138

2137

2155

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii)] 4

02-

.10

ン

00-

18.

00.

70 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15: 2011/पौष 25, 1932

2156

14) (Centd)

2157

2201

2200

2198

127

85 15) Shrikarpur

128

129

121

120

119

118

[F. No. L-14014/113/2010-G.P.]

K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2011.

का. आ. 166. भारत सरकार को लोकहिल में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मैसर्स रिसाएन्स इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा वासुदेवपुर हावडा पाइपलाइन विछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि, उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः, अब, भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जी उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस सारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपायोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री भास्कर त्रिपाठी, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , रिलॉजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड, प्रथम मंजिल , फोर्जुन टावर, चन्द्रशेखरपुर, भुबनेश्वर 751023, ओडिशा राज्य को लिखित रूप में आंक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

3GI/11-26 534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

अनुसूची

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)] राज्य : ओडिशा

जिला:जाजपुर

सर्वे सं / सब डिविजन सं

546

684

554

687

401

892

402

403

893

466

487

आर.ओ.यूअर्जित करने के लिए बेठफल

हेक्टेयर एयर सि एयर 3

28 15

00 24

66 00 16 94 00 12

92 00 25 10 00

15 00

06 84 00

00 13

12 00 07

30 16

40 00 00

75 16

456/894

467

463

462

457

460

458

459

454

765

137

134

136

138

139

142

141

145

143

144

667

669

148

668

151

150

00 01 22 00

10 23

40 00 02

53 00 22 15 02- 83 00

00 03

10 00

68 00-

00 0559 00

18 05

00 01

57 03

75 00

00 18

65 00 02

00 03

65 00 01

28 00 02

24 00 18

05 00 00

27 00

67 00 03

00 01

44 07

79 00 11

41 00 04

22 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौत्र 25 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

152 1) वनकारी (निरंतर)

153

154

155

885

646

647

645

639

896

644

638

सर्वे सं 638 और 637 के बीच में

637

623

622

804

624

621

759

758

757

796

565 2) गोचरेश्वर

575

576 02

19 06

90 00

52 00 19

¥71 00

38 0026

47 06

10 00

17 0013

1 00

0002

02.

00.

15:

02 20 00

00 530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA- 25 , 1932

2 2) गोवरेशार (निरंतर)

574

567

.573

577

578

579

572

571

560

559

580

925

558

581

557

556

547

545

546

544

543

542

539

928

538

536

537

533

603

346

317

328

326:

327

325

323

324

338

715

717

1497

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii )] 3

00 00

25 00 00

25 00 05

87 00 00

13 00 00

17 00 00

66 00

0-2

31 00 00

74 00 00

10 00 06

40 00 00

99 00

83 00 02

43 00

16 00 04

89 00 00

68 00 00

10 00 02 01. 00 00

45 00 08

93 00 09

07 00 06

58. 00 01

16 00

00 06

00 10

00 00

46 00 13

00 14- 90

-00 02

00 01

00 05

00. 08

00 04

00 01

00 03

00 -08

od 00

00 06

81 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 / पौष 25 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

1480 3) बरंडा (निरंतर )

750

751

799

800

805

803

790

789

869

870

872

903

904

905

906

907

943

942

941

925

940

926

933

932

931

1003

1077

1078

1079

1096

1094

1095

242 4) जायुझरी

243

244

248-

245

264

246

263

537 3

04 92 00

00 20 30

78 00 09

40 0001

0012 . 29

95 00

200 01- 35

23 00 13

03 67 00

84 0002

0003 43

01 86- 00

35 0005

06 80 00

33 00

95 0010

0008 40

93 00 07

38 0004

00 07 21

12 33 00

0000

25 00

80 0018

73 0009 538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

262

जायुझरी (निरंतर)

266

261

269

270

260

259

257

277

278

279

276

280

283

281

371

370

284

282

309

310

311

358

312.

324

325

327

328

3.26

332

330

329

331

319

335

318

336

337

340

339

338

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] 4

33 01

60 00

82 00 03

35 00 01

20 00 02

29 00 06

10 00

24 06

11 00

00 02

33 00 03

08. 14

21 00 01

00 02

91 01- 15 00

67 00 00

11 00 04

88 00 00

79 00 06

00 00 12

00 01

10 00 00

27 00

00 06

37 00

20 00

00 00

10 07

15 00

47 00

51 00

00 00

10 00 05

55 00

57 03

78 00

00 02 35 00 04

76 02

43 00

00 01

33 00 02

64 04

39..

धस्त का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 / 25, 1932-

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

449

4) जानुकारी (निरंतर)

450

451

452

गाँव सींमा और सर्वे से 905 के चीव में

5) रगडीपशी

905

906

908-

1191

1434

1447

1446

1445

1449

1448

1462

1463

1461

1458

1459

1460

1455

1454

1484

1485

1430

150/1397

151/1398

157/1405

156/1404

154/1401

1403

155/140.4

161/1409.

162/1410

134/1380

163/1411

1340

1341

1249

1252

28 0008

72 06

78 00 01

33 0002

11 0000

00 00 89

87 00 06

09 00 03

00.

0001

03 0006

00-

0003 17

12- 65 00

88 00

93. 00

07 00 04

43 00

79 00 01

01 36 00

000056

0.5

76 00

25 00

22 0000

54 0003

79 00-05

0.1

94 00

31 00 13

04 91 00

03.

77 00:03

01 35 00 [Part II-Sec. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

1250

5) লে

1251

1244

1243

1242

1241-

1240

27/55

26/54

9/27

15/33

12/30

10/28

65/208

209

210

107/368

374

373

372

108/369

109/370

110/371

363

422

423-

361

:92 00

10 00

74 00

00 04

90 00

26 02

52 00

88 00 07 79

31 00 06

00 00

80 00

76 00 09

53 00

46 00 ,

00 02

02-

23 00

00 20

89 00 01

56 00

91 00

57 00

32 00

72 -00

00 00

01.

89 00 01

87 00

02.

105/356

357

18 00 00

106/359

358

355

77 00

121/424

354

104/352

353

343

342

47 00 00

78 00 01

122/425

42 00 02

132/438

23 00 01-

123/426

भारत का रामपत्र : मनवरी 15, 2011 / 25,1932

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

124/427 7) कुसनापासी (निरंतर)

131/436

125/428

341

127/430

126/429

128/432

431

29/433

95/325

94/324

144/520

521

522

93/322-

323

145/52

526

320-

527

536

535

92/319.

318

317

528

534

530

147/529

316

531

621

622

152/628

151/627

623

620

615

150/626

624

625 3G/11-27

84 00 01

24 0000

53 0001

99 0000

10 00 00

22 00 00

00 0896

13 00

51 00

62 0001

00 07 10 00 0083

11 0000

10 00 00

0000

20 0000

88 00 00

10 0000

28 00

37 00 01 07 00

76 0002

69 0002 36

27 0001

64 542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

614

7) सुषमापाशी (निरंतर)

613

651

648

649

650

652

653

654

655

656

480

481.

479

112

111

110

108

107

106

105

104

103

147

148

149

6/150

14/266

267

275

13/265

276

264

263

249

250

258

257

255

256

10/252

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii ) ] 3

66 01

00 01

67 00 .02

15 00 01.

19 00 02

21 00

75 10

00 01

81 01

.00

08 00

18 00

00 00. 38 00

65 00

40 00

75 48

00 25

24 00 02

20 00 03 66 03

22 00

03 00 03

27 00 02

78 00 03

08 03

94 00 05

50 04

99 00 15 43 00 05

32 00 00

33 00

44 00 08

51 00. 02

25 00 01

80 00 03

17 00 03

00 00 98 00 02

50 00 04

43 01

45 00 00

10 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौर 25 , 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

11/253 9) मधुपुरपट (निरंतर )

227

483

484

485

486

17/482

488

489

492

18/491

487

224

493

494

19/495

499

20/496

21/497

498

501

22/502

67/591

592

64/590

63/588

586

585

556

555

554

553

519

43/556

523

524

42/548

32/528

526

527

529

47 0003

00 00 05

00 00

51.

00 10 00

35 00 00 25

50 0003.

000010

20 0004

10 00

49 00

88. 00

22 0005

10 00 00

32 0001

00 05 08 00 03: 10 00 00

75 00

19 00 00

74 00 01

38 00 05 67 00 04. 78 00 03

36 00 02 92

70 00 06

00 544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

530

41/545

40/544

531

33/532

34/535

534

722

723

533

1081

10)

1085

1086

1087

1088

1089

1084

1090

1094

1095

10,93

1099

1100

1101

1102

1104

1103

1105

1106

1113

1114

1115

1123

123.7

1122

1120

1121

1240

1119

1269

1311

[Part I-Sec. 3 (ii )) 3

00 00

89 00 00 74 00 01

70 00 03

13 00 08 63 00 03

09 00 00

97 00 01

03 00 00

11 01

48 00,

10 00 00

00 00

32 00.02

51 00 05

78 03

29 00 01

94 00 00

19 00 00

60 00

15 08

41 02

26 00

00 16、 53 00 15

23 00 05

86 00

42 02

06 07

10 01

22 03

00 00

64 00

02 00

49 08

10 00 07

17 00 00

15 00 01

60 00

28 05

00 02 14 00 03

79 00 02

17 02

98 00 01

10 1310 10) मेगुठिआ (निरंतर )

1270

1271

1274

1272

1309

1273

1302

1301

1298

1299

1297

1296

1295

1294

1290

1291

1293

1292

1361

1362

2051 11) अंटिआ

2052

2056

2057

2055

2054

2058:

2323

2324

2322

2325

2321

2300

2312

2311

2313

2314

2315

2309

2308

74 00 01

12 01.

०६-

27 00:03

07 00 04

02 00

00 0276

07 0003

02 68 00

40 02

32 0004

00.

76 0005

02 33 00

:00

000010

47 00 05

00 01

00 00 01 56

81 00

76 0004

70 0001

01.

65 00 04

03 58 00

00 01 43

199

$00 /

100

02 0005

83.

00-

10 546

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)]

2310

अठिन (निरंतर)

2304

00 02

22.66

83 DO

2306

2305

00: 03

2265

2264

00 00

32/107

12) वीचंवनपुर

31/106

00 16

30/105

25 00

29/104

48 00

28/103

102.

96.

09 97

00.

18 00 00

66 00 01

22 00 00

18/86

27/95

06.

20/88

00 01

19/87

8/54

44 00 02 97

07/53

13) खरिलो

00 13

14 00 01

118/247

110/239

111/240

238

18 00 29

37 00

97/224

225

96/223

00 03

89/216

00 00

10.

88/215

00. 07

84/211

00 07

74 00 00

85/212

83/210

94 00. 00

81/208

80/207

00 06

03 : 00

79/206

196

03 00 01

162/301

00.

83 00

163/305

302

40 303 13) खरिलो (निरंतर)

195

72/193

192

306

71/191

65/309

65/175

310

311

31.2

313

314

353

367

354

355

366

370

371

372

373

374

392

391

365

364

393

390

389

409

413

2 14) कुस्तीरा

2606 15) सुलिआ

337

338

339

2624 00 01

82 05

10 00.00

48 0006

41 16

90 0.0

56 00 01 10. 07.

90 02

90 00

33 00

79 00 06

70 00 04

78 00 01

02 72 00

23 04:

27 00

13 00 10.

00 00

17 01

10 02

88 02

27 07

56 00.

10 00 0.0

42. 01

00 :

1 00

10 00

89 0006

14 00

95 00 04

73 50

59 20 00

00 13

62 00 90

00 25" 57

20 0064

92 00

68.

10:

00 04 38 548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2623 15 ) सुलिआ (निरंतर)

2625

335

336

332

331

268

254-

253

269

303

304

305

306

302

300

301

288

299

287

286

289

197

196

195

194

290

193

385

2829

503

504

सर्वे से 504 और 502 के बीच में

502

505

1708

511.

509

2888

2885

508

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

00 00

10 00

63 00

15. 00 00

12 00 01

25 00 07

65 00 00

10 00 06 96. 00 0.2

65 00

10 00 02

46 00 06

00 00 00

99 00 00

65 00 01

34 00 01

25 00 02

88 00 00

41 00 00 , 98 00 00

10 00

53 16

00 00

19 00 01

89, 00 04

05 00 04 26 00 01 88 00 00

63 00 08

05 00 00

45 00 00

99 00

1 00 00

42 00

70 00 03

10 00 01

44 00 01

08 00. 01

15 00 00

10 00 01

46 [ भांग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र जनवरी 15, 2011 /फोन 25, 1952

15)

(निरंतर)

507

2887

2886

524

523

510

518

519

522

520

521

517

2795

52.8

529,

530

531

532

533

534

839

838

837

2711

536

535

537

836

835

819

820

821

822

817

824

815

809

810

811

808

825 3Gi/11-28

0002 56 00 01 60

11 00 01 47 00

00 01 45

0445

00 01

33 00

00 01 73 00 01

73 00 02

00 01

00 00

00 05

00 00

56 00 01 42 0001 25 00 01

00 03

00 00 15 00 03

00 01

0000 10 00 09

00 02

0001

00 00

00 03

00 550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 / PAUSA 25 , 1932

807

(15)

806

803

804

670

705

671

2757

672

805

673

676

675

674

731

719

730

720

722

721

724

718

717

716

715

723

725

714

748

7883

749

750

2928

751

752

697

753

760

761

754

[Part I-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

75 03

00 03

32 00

10 00

46 00

10 -00

00.00

18 00

49 00

37 00 03

00 00

78 00

59 02

24 00 02

72 0004

46 00

32 00 04

00 00

19 0001

12 00 00

78 00

13 00 00

13 00

33 0000

25 00

95 00

15 00 00

00 03 06

52 00 02

10 [ श्राम IH- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25,1932

757 15) सुलि (निरंतर).

759

998

2672

758

2816

1000

1001

1002

1003

2814

2815

1962. 16) अरतीआकुसुनपुर

1963

1964

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012-

2214

2013

2200

2153

2330

2329

2154

2155

2156

2158

2143

2142

2139

2138

2.137

2117

2118

2119

2129

2123

2127 00 01 38 00

00 01 17

10 00 01 53

92 00 06

14 0003

20 00 00

13 00 03. 08 00

00-

43 00 02

00 02 78 *

00 01 83 0002 40 0001 40

16 0003

23 00 01

31 00 04 80 -00 03. 20

700

0000 49

00 00 05

12 00 28 52 00 05 96

80 000005 00 01 11

31 00 02 98

60 00 00

33 552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2334

16)

2125

2124

2122

2338

2367

2337

2366

2309

2061

2241

2242.

2067

2240

2068

2070

935

888

887

886

885

883

889

890

882

881

880

879

878

877

876

875

874

873

870

869

868

865

864

862

860

[Part II-Sec. 3( ii )] 3

00 0.1

56 00

10 02

59 00. 04

88 00 06

99 00 04

46 00 00

10 01

79 00 00

53 00 01

86 0001

00 00

10 00 00

10 00 01

64 00 04

26 00 02 02 00 02 93

90 0000

00 05

94 00 00

97 00 12

11 00 00

66 00 00

30 00

23 05

00 01

12 00 01

00 02

33 00 02 19 00 00

37 00 04.

34 00 03 55 03

09 03

35 00

12 00 01

46 00 02

00 00

10 15, [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

95 17) मंगर

06.

343

14.

200 18 ) करकिरी

-193

194

197

195

196

191

1748 00

00 90

34 3

62 0005

00.

02 37 00

10 00 100

00 1128

00 48 00

03 97 00

00. 03

72 00 02 42

20 0005

69 000088 00 01 35

82 00 0124

04 57 00

29 00 02

0004 82 0000 20 0000

0250 00

03 00 07

0049 00

99 02

15 00 03 78 00 00

03 00 02

00 01

00 554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

182.

करझिरी (निरंतर).

18 )

183

188

[Part II-Sec . 3( ii ) ] 3

00 00

20 00

37 07

00 02

34 00

70 00

मर्वे सं 188 और 185 के वीच में

185

184

180

00 01

51 00 09

80 00 00

21 00 07

सर्वे सं 180 और 148 के बीच में

148

149

143

138

142

141

140

139

106

105

1655

104

103

84.

968

19 ) कुसनापारा

965-

967

9.69

970

980

966

29 00 06

96 00 04

77 00 01

12 00 04

69 00

13 07

00 04

17 00 12

06 00 00

31 00 03

37 00 07

57, 00 22 30 00

88 00

69 03

00 01 60 00 00

10 04

58 00

88 07

00 02

21 02

68 00

00 03

36 00 02- 88 05

29 00

31 02

51 00 , -00

10 00

00 05

12 00 03

65 00

67 00

00 14 भारत का राजपत्र : जम्बरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

983 कुसनापारा (निरंतर)

19)

982

981"

990

1078

1077

1079

1076

1080

1081

1070

1074

1071

1067

10.68

1069

1064

1063

1065

10.66

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1013

10.11

1012

1010

934

933

503

4217

501.

502

504

515

04 0003

65 00 02

1.1

97 00

04 91 00

00 01

3錠

90 0004

58 00

51 0003

25 00 01

69 0001

00 0018

98 0002

00021 000093

62 0001 31 0001

00 01 86

0174 0,0

00 00 74 00 80 26

25 00

0000

04 0001

10 0002 24 00 04737

43 00

00 556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 19) कुसमाधाय (निरर)

516

500

517

498

497

496

499

494

492

495.

491

477

478

482

47.9

480

481

5-29

173

172

169

168

174

166

167.

165

163

162

149

161

160

157

156

148 .

150

132

131

155

154

151

130

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

00 00

90 00 05

78 00 00

67 00 00

89 00 00

299 00 03: 85 00

51 00 01

33 00 02

00 00 . 10 00 02

78 00 02

94 00 02. 59 00 03

00-

95. 00 、 07 66 00 00

86 00 00

10 00

46 00 01

18 00 05

93 00 04

28. 00 04 00

00 00

90 00 00

00 00

92 :

00 06 08

00 00

00 03

00 00

00 02

64...

00 00

53 557

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष25, 1932

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

129

19) कुसनापारा (निरंतर)

152

128

127

125

124

122

-126

121

120

4208

119

118

111

117

112

113

114

178

4129

220

219

213

216

217

218

225

4072

4180

4073

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:कोराय

जिला:जाजपुर

2783

1) सोलपदभ्रमपुर

2282

2833

2835

2444

2306

2307

2319

2308

2309 3G1 /11-29

00 00

13 00 01

14 01

93. bo 01

57 00 04

62 00 28

00 06

10 00

00 14

00 00

50 00 00

00 08

05 1 .

67 00

21 :00 00

00 06 97 02. 95 00

00 02

30. 00 03

81 00 06

05 00 04

68 00 00.

81 00

08 00.02

53 00 02

71 00 05

00 05

97 राज्य:ओडिशा

78 00:

02 01

11 00

06 00 11

13 00 00

00 00

00 558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2310 (1 ) सोलपटमालपुर (निरंतर)

2305

2304

2266

2299

2263

2271

2272

2274

2273

2279

2280

2284

2283

428

425

429

430

405

407

406

403

404

387

388

390

389

384

391

392

393

383

351

352

354

353

355

333

334

335

320

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii ) ]

00 06

85 00

37 00 01

03 00

17 00

67 00

51 00 06

23 00

36 00 04

65 04

35 00 03

61 00 03

64 00 03

43 00 02

65 00 01

35 00 00

25 02

06 00 04

59 00

76 00

30 00

77 00 01

00 00

10 00

70 00

13 00

01 00

14 01

00 01

78 00 01

89 02

68 00 02

04 00 05

78 00

10 00

57 00 01

79 00 02

23 00 00

21 00 06

05 00 07

01 00

45 00 00

69 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौथ 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

331

1 ) सोलपटभगपुर (निरंतर)

330

329

517

518

560

559

558

565

566

586

589

591

590

598

597

596

619

618

611

66 00

24 00

८

17 00

73 00

00 07

02 00 04

00 .

37 00 06

29 00

00 06

04.

00 01

40 00

00 00

78 00

10 00 00

सर्वे सं 611 और 616 के बीच में

616

617

615

00 00

91 00 04

59 00 00

10 00 00

सर्वे सं 615 और 651 के बीच में

651.

650

645

647

648

649

652

910

653

909

898

654

671

908

890

900

86 00 00

49 00 01

40 00 03

65 00 01

00 00

97 00 01 32 00 00

19 00

61 00 00

66 00 01

98 00 10

66 560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2827 ) ोलपटझामपुर (निरंतर)

901

902

903

895

893

892

887

885

883

884

861

860

857

853

836

838

851

852

1612

1146

1150

1151

1149

1148

1165

1164

1163

1196

1197

1198

1200

432 2) ग्राहमनाबार

433

434

436

438

437

442

443

444

[Part II-Sec. 3( ii ) ] 4

00 04

89 00 00

10 00 00

81 00 00. 10 00 08

19 00 04

69 00 09

65 00 03

58 00 05

78 00 02

92 00 00

91 00 05

28 00 01

21 00 00

25 00 28 82. 00

01 00 12

48 00 27

82 00

00 01

05 00 02

00 04

00 05

46 00

26 00

00 06

00 02

00 04

73 00 03.

00 02

23 00 01

22 00 07

67 00 10

00 00

00 02

00 06

65 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

479

2) ब्राहमनाबार (निरंतर)

445

448

376

450

449

451

456

467

466

465

468

469

470

518

471

472

315

314

311

313

312

310

308

302

303

305

304

301

166

165

168

164

162

161

167

146

159

160

158

155

561

σο 00

19 00 22

99 00 06

10 02

60 05

57 :

00 00

84 11

34 00

17 00 04

77 03

00 02

87 00 00

31 01

45 00

71 12

10 0.0

05.

50 10

48 00 01

56 00

88 05

31 00

57 00 01

42 01

58 00

12 00 03

00 07

10 00 .

17 01

79 03

92 00

47 00

00 01

80 01

84 00

53 00

02 02

84 00 00

09 00

0125 00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

00 00

54 154

2) ब्राहमनाकार (निरंतर)

147

134

148

133

131

149

130

90 132

00 10

121

110

620

51 119

118

32 116

फा सं. एल. - 14014/112/2010 - जी.पी. ]

के.के .शर्मा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2011

S. O. 166. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited to consumers in various parts of the country , Kakinada - Basudebpur - Howrah pipeline should be laid by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And whereas , it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of Usertherein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri Bhaskar Tripathy , Competent Authority , Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, 1st Floor , Fortune Tower , Chandrasekharpur , Bhubaneswar 751023 , Orissa State.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष, 25, 1932

563

Schedule

District: Jajapur Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Dharmasala

Village

State: Orissa

Area tobe acquired for

Survey No./Sub-Division

2 1

546 1) Dankari

684

554

687

401

892

402

403

893

466

487

456/894

467

463

462

457

460

458

459

454

765

137

134

136

138

139

142

141

145

143

144

667

669

148

668

151

150 Hec

Are

C-Are

94.

07 30

00.

15.

00 00

04 564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

1 i

2 1) Dankari (Contd)

152

153

154

155

885

646

647

645

639

896

644

638

In bet suy no . 638 & 637

637

623

622

804

624

621

759

758

757

796

2) Gobareswar

565

575

576

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

09.

19.

84 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(

374

2) Gobareswar (Contd)

567

573

577

578

579

572

571

560

559

580

925

558

581

557

556

547

545

546

544

543

542

539

928

538

536

537

533

603

346

317

328

326

327

325

323

324

338

715

3) Barada

717

1497

3GI/11-30 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

1480

750

751

799

800

805

803

790

789

869

870

872

903

904

905

906

907

943

-942

941

925

940

926

933

932

931

1003

1077

1078

1079

1096

1094

1095

242

243.

244

248

245

264

246

263

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ] 3

00.

03.

12 29

06.

00.

17 .

00.

73 [भाग II- 3 (il)]

262

4) Jamujheri (Coned )

00002

266

261

269

270

260

259

257

277

00 01

278

00 02

279

276

280

283

281

371

370

284

282

309

310

311

312

324

325

321

328

326

332

330

329

331

319

335

318

336

337

340

339

338 [Part II-Sec. 3( ii) ] HE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 449

450

451

452

betVB& suy no.905 905

906

908

1191

1434

1447

1446

1445

1449.

1448

1462

1463

1461

1458

1459

1460

1455

1454

1484

1485

1430

150/1397

151/1398

157/1405

156/1404

154/1401

1403

155/1402

161/1409

162/1410

134/1380

163/1411

1340

1341

1249

1252

08.

02-

00.

-09

00 . 06

17.

00 -10

00: 03 88

01г

: 00.

03 40.

00 [भाग II- 3( i) )

1250

5) Ragadipasi (Comed).

1251

1244

1243

1242

1241

-1240

27/55

6) Purunia

26/54

9/27

15/33

12/30

10/28

65/208

7) Krushanapasi

209

210

107/368

374

373

372

108/369

109/370

110/371

363

422

423

361

105/356

357

106/359,

358

355

121/424

354

104/352

353

343

342

122/425

132/438

123/426 JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 124/427

131/436

125/428

341

127/430

126/429

128/432

431

29/433

95/325.

94/324

144/520

521

522

93/322

323

145/523

526

320

527

536

535

92/319

318

317

528

534

530

147/529

316

531

621

622

152/628

151/627

623

620

615

150/626

624

625

[Part II-Sat.3(1)] 3

-00

99.

06.

00.

04.

07 00

00 649

650

652

653

654

655

656

430

8) Thakura

481.

479

112-

9) Madhupurp

110

108

107

106

105.

104

103

147

148

149

6/150

14/266

267

275-

13/265

276

264

263

249

250

258

25.7

255

256

10/252 572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

11/253 9)

227

483

484

485

486

17/482

488

489

492

18/491

487

224

493

494

19/495

499

20/496

21/497

498

501

22/502

67/591

592

64/590

63/588

586

585

556

555

554

553

519

43/556

523

524

42/548

32/528

526

527

529

[Part 11 Sec. 3( ii)]

.00

0478

00 00

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का रायपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/फोन 25, 1932

530 9) Madhupurpet (Contd)

41/545

40/544

531

33/532

34/535

534

722

723

533

1081 10) Gengutia

1085

1086

1087

1088

1089

1084

1090

1094

1095

1093

1099

1100

1101

1102

1104

1103-

1105

1106

1113

1114

1115

1123

1237

1122

1120

1121

1240

1119

1269

1311 3G/11-31

97 N00

03 00

51 00

26 60

00 574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

1310

1270

1271

1274

1272

1309

1273

1302

1301

1298

1299

1297

1296

1295

1294

1290

1291

1293

1292

1361

1362 11) Antia

2051

2052'

2056

2057

2055

2054

2058

2323

2324

2322

2325

2321

2300

2312.

2311

2313

2314

2315

2309

2308

[Part II Sec . 3(ii ) ] 4

-01

10.

00 [भाग II-खण्ड (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौन

2310 11) Antia(Contd)

2304

2266

2306

2305

2265

2264

32/107 12) Srichandanpur

31/106

30/105

29/104

28/103

102

18/86

27/95

20/88

19/87

8/54

07/53

118/247 13) Kharilo

110/239

111/240

238

97/224

225

96/223

89/216

88.215

84/211

85/212

83/210

81/208

80/207

79/206

196

162/301

163/305

302 00

39 00

00.

00 16

25 00 02

79 00

0023 00

22 00,

19 00 06

00 01

03 08

18 00

99 00

0010

14 00 00.2

116

03 00

94 09

83 60

40 00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

303

13)

-195

72/193

192

306

71/191

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

65/309

65/175

310

311

312

313

314

353

367

354

355

366

370

371

372

373

374

392

391

365

364

393

390

389

409

413

14 Kumint

2606 15 Sulia

337.

338

339

2624 01

ΟΙ

10.

14.

38 राजपत्र [भाग ।- खष्ट 3 ( ii) ]

2623 15) Sulin(Cond)

2625

335

336

332

331

268

254

253

269

303

304

305

306

302

300

301

288

299

287

286

289

197

196

195

194

290

193

385

2829

503

504

In bet suy no. 504 & 502

502

505

1708

511

509

2888

2885

508

115 , 2011 / 25 , 1932

12 00

65 00

00..

65 00

10 00

00.

99 00

53 00

00,

05 00

63 00

08、 05

45 00

99 00

42 00

02 70

09 00

10 00

44 00

08 00

10 00 00

46 00 578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

507

15) Sulia(Contd)

2887

2886

524

523

510

518

519

522

520

521

517

2795

528

529

530

531

532

533

-534

839

838

837

2711

536

535

537

836

835

819

820-

821

822

81.7

824

815

809

810

811

808

825-

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

00.

37.

04 37

01-

06:

το

00 : 09

03.

82 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौर 25, 1932

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

807 15) Solia ( Contd)

806

803

804

670

705

671

2757

672

805

673

676

675

674

731

719

730

720

722

721

724:

718

717

716

715

723

725

714

748.

7883

749

750

2928

751、

752

697

753

760

761

754

5 3

75 00

00:

00-

55 00

46 00

18 00

01.

59 00.

0013 00

24 00

46 00

01 .

28 00

01.

16 00

19 00:

61 00

96 00

01.

78 00

00:

03 -10 00

13. 00

33 00

50 00

01.

25 00

95 00

06 0003

10 00.00

10 00 400 580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

757

15) Sula ( Contd)

759

998

2672

758

2816

1000'

$1001.

1002

1003

2814

2815

1962 16) Aratiakusumpur

1963

1964

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2214

2013

2200

2153

2330

2329

2154

2155

2156

2158

2143

2142

2139

2138

2137

2117

2118

2119

2129

2123

2127

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ) 4

-06

08、

17..

02 43

01 . 83

40-

31-

33 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पीक 25, 1932

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2334 16) Aratiakusumpur(Contd)

2125

2124

2122

2338

2367

2337

2366

2309

2061

2241-

2242

2067

2240

2068

2070

935

888

887

886

885

883

889

890

882

881

880:

879

878

877

876

875

874

873

870

869

868

865

864

862

860 3GI/11-32

59 00

88 00

99 00 06

46 00

79 00

01.

73 00

86. 00

10 00

64 00

26 00

93 00

97 00

66 00 00

23 00

12 00

19.

37 00

55 00

00 00

75 00

54 00

48 00

00 582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

2 17)

343

46.

18) Karanjlari

200

193

194

197

195

196

191

1748

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)] 3

03-

77 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

182 18) Karanjiari (Contd)

183

188

Inbet suy no. 188& 185

185

184.

180

Inbet suy no. 180& 148

148

149

143

138

142

141

140

139

106

105

1655

104.

103

968 19) Krushnapeгa

965

967

969

970

980

966

09 00

10:

07 13 00

31 00

30 00

01 88

21 00 02

03.

00 02

01 00

10 00 00

88 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 19 Krushnapara (Contd)

983

982

981

990

1078

1077

1079

1076

1080

1081

1070

1074

1071

1067

1068

1069

1064

1063

1065

1066

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009.

1013

1011

1012

1010

934

933

503

4217

501

502

504

515

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)] 3

00. 41

01.

$00

86 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

516 19) Krushnapara( Contd)

500

517

498

497

496

499

494

492

495

491

477

478

482

479

480

481

529

173

172

169

168

174

166

167

165

163

162

149

161

160

157

156

148

150

132

131.

155

154

151

130 3

00-

67 00

89 00

99 00.

85 00.

51.

33. 00

94 00

00 00

95 00

86 00

00.

10 00

46 00

28 00

08 00

42 00

33 00

00 00

10 00

21 00:

53 00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

586

2 1

129

19) Krushnapara (Coned)

152

128

127

125

124

122

126

121

120

4208

119

118

111

117

112

113

114

178

4129

220

219

213

216

217

218

225

4072

4180

4073

District: Jajapur

2783 1) Sol

2282

2833

2835

2444

2306

2307

2319

2308

2309

[Part II Sec. 3(ii) ) 4

61.

00.

00 . 04

.00

09.

State:Orissa

00 राजपत्र

15, 2011/4 25 , 1932

2 (Coned)

2310

2305

2304

2266

2299

2263

2271

2272

2274

2273

2279

2280

2284

2283

428

425

429

430

405

407

406

403

404

387

388

390

389

384

391

392

393

383

351

352

354

353

355

333

334

335

320 3

00 06

37 00:

03 00

17 00

00.

51 00

23 00

10.

65 -00

04 35 100

61 00

64 00

65 00

35 00

399 00

00-

30 00

17 00

70 00. 04

00.

14 00

78. 00

68 00

10 00

57 00

90.

05 00

45 00

00 588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

331

330

329

517

518

560

559

558

565

566

586

589

591

590

598

597

596.

619

618

611

In bet suy no . 611 & 616

616

617 .

615

く

In bet suy no . 615 & 651

651

650

645

647

648

649

652

910

653

* 909

898

654

-671

908

890

900

[Part II Sec. 3(ii)] 4

02.

+00

91 00

0097

32 00

00 : 02

00 1

2827 1 ) Solpatbrahmapur (Conad)

901

灣

902 وق

903

895

٢٤

893

892

887

885

883

884

861

860

857

853

836

838

851

852

1612

1146

1150

1151

1149

1148

1165

1164

1163

1196 許:

1197

1198.

1200

432 2) Braamanabar

433

434

436

438

437

442

443

444

479

445

448

376

450

449

451

-456 3GI/11-33

00 00

60 59.

05 78 FRE

00 :

00 05 28

21 THE

00 00.

00:

01 01

10 %

01-

00- 10

192

00.

11.

06-

$00

125

4,00

00.

02.

1.1

00 02

99-

00 02

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

2 467

466

465

468

469

470

518

471

472

315

314

311

313

312

310

308

302

303

305

304

301

166

165

168

164

162

161.

167

146

159

160

158

155

154

147

134

148

133

131

149

130

132

121

110

620

119

118

116

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] 3

00 10

41:

00. 00

[F. No. L-14014/112/2010-G.P .] K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy, [भाग 3( 11) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पीच 25 , 1932

APPEARANC

श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 20 दिसम्बर, 2010

For theWirkun :No

Mumbai ovember, 2010

का. आ. 167.-औद्योगिक विचार अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मध्य रेलवे प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 41012/149/2004- आई आर( की- I ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour apli Employment byits Order No. dated 22-2-2005 in omenage of the powers commed by clause (d) ofof sub- section ( 1 ) call aub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have reitered the following industrial dispute to this Tribunet for Bdjudication:

NewDelhi, the 20thDecember,2010

S.O. 167. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 59/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- LabourCourt -2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Railway and their workmen, .. receivedbythe Central Governmenton 14-12-2010 .

"Whether the action oftheGeneral Manager , Central Railway, Mumbai through its pificers in award the punishment of Compulsory Retirement with consequential benefits to Shri D. P. Raikwar vide order dated 11-6-2003 read with order dated 26-9-2003 is legal , propor and just ? If not, Genwhat reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which duc and what other directions are necessary in the matter?"

[No. 1-41012/149/2004- IR(B-1)] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, MUMBAI

PRESENT:

K.B. Katake, PresidingOfficer.

ReferenceNo. CGIT-2/59 of2005

( Employers in relation to the managonment of ( 1 ) G. M. , Central Railway, Mumbai, (2 ) DRM, Central Railway, Mumbai , (3) Sr. DCM, Central Railway,Mumbai.

(1) TheGeneral Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST,Mumbai-1.

2. The matrix ofthe case in nut shell is as follo Workman, late D. P. Raikwar , was sorying with Cootel Railway. The General Manages, Ceutral Railway had directed inquiry for having found excess amount of Rs. 1,010 with the workman in his ticket sale collection ofthe day and the workman was M. Booking Clerk, therefore, inquirywas directed. The inquiry Officer hold the workinar guilty and submitted the inquiry report to the General Manager, Central Railway, TheGeneralManager, vide his order dt. 11-6-2003 removed the workman from the service. The workman preferred appeal against said pontity of Lemoval from service. The competent authority i.e. , the ADRM (S) considered the appead of the workreas and reduced the penalty to compulsory reuρoιηρημνόδημα απλ dk. 26-9-2003. The workman has applied to the Labour Commissioner through Union for conciliation. As the conciliation failed, the matter was retired to Cov of hidia, Ministry of LofLabour and Employmen, New Delki (2) Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST, Mumbai - 1.

3. The Union has filed Statement of Citim (Ex-8) (3) Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST, Mumbai - 1 .

AND

Their Workmen.

TheGeneral Secretary,

Madhya Railway Karamchari Sangh,

33 , Moti Bhawan,

Dr.D'Silva Road, Dadar (W),

Mumbai-400028 .

contending that the inquiry was not proper and the punishment is disproportionate . According to them the Departmental enquiry was held in violation of the provisions of law and against the pebiciples of natural justice, therefore, it is illegal and unsustainable.Therefore , findinging of InquiryOfficer deserves to be a also pray that the punishment awarded ako spoke te quashed andand the legal heit's of the worldt consequomial reliels which working wat ontntd by reinstatement.

[PART SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETER OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011/PAUSA 25, 1932

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of Central Railway and their workmen , receivedbythe Central Government on 14-12-2010 .

(NO. 141011 /30/2008 - IR (B - I )]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. Z, MUMBAI

PRESENTES CA

K.B-Katake, Presiding Officer

RéferenceNo. COIT-2/770/2009

Employers in relation to the management of Central 4. TheParty No. 1 , Central Railway pesisted the statement of claim vide their written statement (Ex-9). Accer working as a Head Booking Clerk. He was found guilty of serious charges of over-charging the decoy passengers . Departmental enquiry dus void in accordatice with the disciplinary rules. Reasonable opportunity was given to the workind end hinben. The Inquiry Officer the charges levelled against order of removal of boot, the punishment was alan with full consequential ation and other benefits wae givell to the widow of the deceased employeployee. According to the deceased workman or his legal heirs are not entitled to claim reinstatement ofthe workman and benefits thereofthereof. The husband of the Nicant les not calamint be remedy of revision . It against thethe order of ompulsory retirement . Therefore , they pray that the cates that he bed no

The General Manage

Central Railway, soda er indrale So

Mumbai CST, Mumbai - 400001 .

AND

Their Workmen

The General Secretary

RailMazdoor UnionASTM ARORA 3. My Lattoodredenster has framed the issues ar Ex- 41 . Themtrevoli kopt for hosting . Since number of dales , the reference was for thing affidavit of witness of partyNo. 2.However, the witness ie. the heirs of deceased workman did not turn -up . As the witness of Party No. 2 was stiling the lotuince we haft for dismissal . Inspite ofthet, none ofthe best heils of the deceased workman remained present of tired antiin. ThisVit. Thus I think claim of the Party No.1 đoàn Với th be belwered. Thus the order :

Matunga, Mumbai . T

APPEARANCES :

For the Employer : Mr. Abhay Kulkarni , Advocate. for want of prosecution

KAIKKE, Presiding Officer

For the Workmen No appearance

famng bim print 20 , 2010

Mumbai , dated 29th November, 2010 अधिनियम, 1947 (1947

14 ( ידייויס में कोद्रीय सरकार मध्य रेलवे कार्य के बीच अनुबंध में औद्योगिक অপচয়ের প্রাইমার 2/2009 ) को प्रकाशित:

करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

सः 10 /18/2008- आई आर( बी-1 ) ]

डेस्क अधिकारी

TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour, by its Order No. L - 41011 /38/2008 - LK ( B - 1 ) dated 17-6-2009 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have reformed the above dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

2. After receipt ofthe reference , notices were sent to both the parties . The union and the workman though were servedby RP /AD thrice, did not tumup since last number of dates . The acknowledgements tire at Ex - 6 , 8 and 11. As the workman concerned and the union are absent since beginning and have not filed their statement 8.0.168. In pursuance of Section 17 of the 1947), the Central Industrial Di Goverment Amply miss is pward ( Ref . No. 72/ 2009) ofThethe CentraCental Goverment Industrial Tribunal - cum- abour Court - 2 , Mumbai as shownown in the Annexure in the [ भाग -खंडू 3 (x)]

of claim, the reference deserves to be dismisset. Thus I pass the following ordono

The reference stands dismissed with no or der as tổ costs..

Date:29-11-2010 K.B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 21 दिसंबर, 2010

का. भा. 16 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1942 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय रेलवे वित्त निगम के प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध निधीजों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण -1,1-1 , दिल्ली के पचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । सीएल-41012/92/2006 -आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 21st December , 2010 S.O. 169. -In pursuance of Section 1717 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No, 10 2009) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court - 1 , Delhithi asas shownshown inin thethe Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Railway Finance Corporation and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-12-20

[NoL -41012/92/2006- IR(B-1) ] we Art to RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. B. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL : NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX L.D. NO . 10/2009

Yatender Kumar Sharmayar

S/ o Shri L. N. Sharma,

R/o342, GroundFloor, Indra Purahi,

Nayay Khand- 11,

Workman Ghaziabad (U. P. )

Versus

TheGeneral Manager,

Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFO

UGF, Bast Tower , N.B.CC/PlaceToode s Bhisham PitamehMarg

Management Pragati Vihar, Lodi Road, New Delhi

AWARD

Professional services of M/s Hingorani M. and Company, CharteredAccountants (hereinafter referred to ns the Retainer of Modobrite) iran Railway FlashooOperation Ranch Cucoja ns the Corporidium ) for perparaderofavor ndian A ofAccounts was under än olingallo to the two of representativen to attend the afhotos to Coporation to barry out jobs folased abover Stiel Milleder Heath des deputed by Retainer of Accouples , đông norteather employee, tocarry out the job in April 1997,while perforting the aforesaid jobs sabelalf ofthe minute of Accountaj he filed a welt peltion bende igy Carto Delhi, seeking his regularisation in service of the Corporation On 28-5-99 di interim order was granted by High Court in his favour , vestramitigate Corpommon thớt to dispense with the service of the chiếnthắnt for Stubenoting himwith some other person as a contact labody father orders. On Ind of time, 1999 the Koo decided towithdraw the claimant from the argument and deputed one Me Swati in hifi phước từ carry out jobs assigned by the Corporation . Despite that order thiment continuedto visit the preintes orthe Corporation Orph of June, 1999, the Corporation ướte à toner tổ thể chinhant and advised him to dán an authority letter from the Retainer of Accounts, an Jase he wants t倍 latter. Acontemptperfon was rod by the Chadiant before High Court of Delhi, which Bettion was dimitted vide order hated 9411290 Subsequently , with petition Was disposed of with pertanssion to the chimất từ apphoách an autorky under the bitkistrial Dispass CP 1997 ( molt the Actionse nuo daiHerbied ९ २९) १० ११८६ सा 2. Claimant filed a claim statement before the Conciliation Officer, in the year 2006 , who pitiated. conciliation proceedings over the matter, The Corporation demurred the claim. Since coseiliation proceedings failed , a failure report was submitted by the Conciliation Officer, before the appropriateGovernement . On consideration of the said failure report, the appropriate Government declined to make a referenca of the dispute Mitsorder dated2812066 flim ens stotis enimą to sw By: Alevre pétition was preteniarby the Charmant before the appropriate Government Review petition was considered by the appropriate advernment and Conciliation Officer was consumer win the water "Phe appropriate Government decided to make areference of the dispute for judicatius Accordingly thе ириде выле Government referred the dispute to this tribunar for adjudication , vide order No. L -41012/92/2006 - IR(B - 1 ) , New Delhit, dated four of March , 2008, Win the following folowing Whether the termination ofshe aprrione & Shri The za Matender Kaew Winfo76199 by the mossport of IRF Ledislegel , fais and justified & fant what i relief the workman.gongoraeshin entitled togod δηρος which date?" 594

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15,2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

she went on to narrate facts in the written statement, so filed. This practice ofthe Corporation is deprecated.

4 Corrigendam dated 40.08 was issued wherein theappropriateGovernorat douted that initially it took a decision to decline a reference but subsequently on consideration of review petition and after consultation with theConciliation Officer itheegheit expedient to refer the dispute for adjudication , in that corrigendum the appropriate Government made a reference to its adjudication order dated 28-3-2008 . Subsequent corrigendune detped 8-5-08 wat beats by the appropriate Government wherein the said dan was corrected as 10th of March, 2008. In either of these corrigendams correction as to the terms of reformice was made. no

5. Claim statement was filed by the chrimant pleading that he was employed by the Corporation inApril, 1997 as an Assistant in Bond Section. Since the date ofhis employment, he has been signing attendance register of theCorporation and was paid for overtime work . However, his wages were being paid through a Sham contractor, which wages were only half of the wages of group ' D' employees .Heworked with the Corporation honestly and diligently.Hewasaworkman within the meaning ofclause (s) ofSection 2of the Act. He had put in 240 days service in each calendar year. No appointment letter and wage slips were issued to him. He along with others, who were similarly placed, made topresentation to the Corporation and other various authorities for regularization of his services. Despite receipt of his repensentation neither his services were regularized nor he was granted legal benefits . Hewas constrained to file a writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 3517 of 1999 before High CountCount ofDelhi. On 28th of May, 99 , an order was passed by the High Court directing theCorporation not toto dispense with his services , which orderwas violated when he was not allowed to join his duties w.e.f. 4-6-99 , He filed a complaint before S. H. O. P.S. R. K. Puram, New Chht. AchAchillekếof thithe Corporation is violative of the provisions of sellon 24-125 -G and 25-H oftheAct.

8. Out ofcontents of the written statement, it could be made out that the Corporation asserts that the claimant was an employee of the Retainer ofAccounts, and not its employee. It has been projected that the Copperstion is not an industry , and the claimant is not a workman . Emphasis have been laid on discrepant facts pleaded in the claim statement and the Corporation agitates that the claimant asserts at one place that he was Assistant while at the other place he projects that he was working as Accountant . Had he been in the employment, of the Corporation,he would have been aware ofhis designation . Filing ofwrit petition by the claimant before High Court of Delhi has not been disputed. Interim order dated 28-5-99 is also admitted. However, the Corporation projects that the claimant was withdrawn from thejob by the Retainer ofAccounts on 3rd of June, 99 and on 7th ofJune, 99 a letter was written to him by the Corporation in that regard. He filed a contempt petition before High Court of Delhi , which was rejected on 11-11-99 . Corporation projects that writ petition was also dismissed and as such order passed by.High Court of Delhi operates as resjudicata . It went on to agitate that in the claim statement, the claimant speaks that his wages were paid through a sham contractor, but he opts not to disclose name of the Contractor . Since the claimant was an employee of Retainer of Accounts, the Corporation was not aware whether he worked honestly or diligently or otherwise. He was never under disciplinary control and authority of the Corporation . There was no occasion for the Corporation to form an opinion about his work and conduct . It has been agitated that since the claimant was not an employee of the Corporation, he cannot assert that juniors to him were regularized. Onus lies on the claimant to prove that he was employee ofthe Corporation. In his claim statement he is trying to take advantage of his own wrong , asserts the Corporation . It has been projected that the claim statement is devoid of merits , hence it maybe rejected.

9. Out ofpleadings , following issues were settled:

1. Whether there was any relationship of employer and employee between the parties ?

2. As in terms of reference .

3. Relief.

6. Claimant asserts that the job performed by him was of permanent nature and still available with the Corporation. Sanctioned posts are still available with the poration and services of his junior have.bebeen regularized . Working as casual or temporary continuously amount to unfair labour practice. He is out ofjob since the date of termination ofhis services.He claims reinstatement with continuityandfull back wages, besides regularization ofhis job

10. Claimant has examined himself in support ofhis claim. Ms. Neera Khuntia tendered her affidavit to establish defence of the Corporation . She was cross examined at length on behalf of the claimant. No other witness was examined by either of the parties.

7. The Corporation filed its written statement running into 43 pages, supported by affidavitofMs.Neera Khuntia,GroupGeneral Manager. When one would like to take an exercise ofreading written statement submitted by the Corporation , he would find hirusif lost in quibbles of linguistic jargons , instead of getting facts out of it . Surprisingly Ms , Khunda was lost in wilderness , when

11. Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri B. S. Rana, authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf [भाग II-खंड़ 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

staff. While the employee, at the time, when his services were engaged, need not have known the identity of this employer, there must have boun some act or contract by which the parties recognized one another as master or servant.

of the claimant . Shri R. P. Kapoor, authorised representative, raised his submissions on behalf of the Corporation. Written arguments were also filed by Shri Kapoor. I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

Issue No. 1.

12. Claimant deposed that he joined services withi Indian Railway Finance Corporation in April, 1997 as an Accountant. His attendance was marked by Shri S. N. Sharma,Administrative Officer. His salary was paid through cheque . Conveyance charges were also paid to him . Payment vouchers in that regard are Ex. WW2/ 1 to Ex. WW1/7. As an Accountant he used to prepare vouchers , cheques and balance sheets etc. He used to perform all work relating to accounts . He used to report to Manager Accounts .All facilities, available to a regular employee, were available to him , Manager Accounts used to sanction his leaves . No appointment letter was issued. He made a demand for an appointment letter and regularization ofhis services, vide letters Ex . WW1 /8 to Ex. WW1 / 15 . On 28-5-99 he was not allowed to join his duties. He made a complaint in this regard to police , which is Ex. WW1 / 16 . Shri M. Kananjoined services after his termination, whose services have been regularized.

15. When claimant was subjected to cross examination , he concedes that representation Ex . WW1 /8 to Ex. WW1/15 nowhere specify his claim neor his signature appear thereon . He further coucedes that a writ petition bearing No. CWP 3519 of 1999 was filed by him before High Court ofDelhi for regularization ofhis services.He wasquestioned to explain as to who (shas contuctor) used topayhis salary, which proposition was avoided by him. However, he tried to assert that he never hothened to notice as to who has drawn choques of his ankory in his favour. Therefore, it is emerging over the record that claimant had intentionally concealed material facie to the effect that cheques of his saluty wore being issued by M/s. Hingorani M. and Co. , the Retainer of Accounts, appointed by the Corporation, s, Khontis nafolds that the claimant was working with Mia. Hingaroni M. and Co. , and not with the Corporation. Out of facts projected by these two witnesses, it is evident that the clansat was paidhis wages by M/ s. Hingoriani M. and Co. , who was Retainer ofAccounts for the Corporation. Claimant concedes that no appointment letter was ever issued in his favour. He was withdrawn from the assignment by M/s. Hingorani M. and Co., which fact is ovident out of letter dated3-6-99 proved as Ex. MW

13. Smt . Neera Khuntia swears in her affidavit Ex . MWI /A that the claimant was never an employee of the Corporation. He claimed salary from his employer, namely, M/s Hingorani M and Co. He was withdrawn by M/s Hingorani M. and Co. to perform job for the Corporation, vide its letter dated 3-6-99 . The claimant has suppressed facts in this regard. He was working in the premises of the Corporation as a representative of M/ s Hingorani M. and Co. Retainer ofAccounts and Finance, appointed by the Corporation.

14. Rival facts testified by the claimant and Ms. Neera Khuntia are to be appreciated, in order to ascertain as towhether relationship of employer and employee was ever established between the parties. The relationship of employer and employee is constituted by a contract, express or implied between employer and employee. A contractofservice is one in which a person undertakes to serve another and to obey his reasonable orders within the scope of the duty undertaken . A contract of employment may be inferred from the conduct which goes to show that such a contract was intended although never expressed and when there has , in fact, been employment ofthekind usually performed by the employees .Any such inference, however, is open to rebuttal as by showing that the relationbetween the parties concerned was on a charitable footing or the parties were relations or partners orwere directors of a limited company which employed no

16. Aperson acting under,under thethe direction of another is obviously employed by the person under whose directionshehe is performing the job Legal connotation of word "employed" is well known . It connotes existence of relationship of master and servant between the employer and the employee. In other words, it involves the concep of employment under a contract of service . The word "employed" does not necessarily mean omployod in casual work. It may merely mean " keeping (hing ) in the sarvine". WhereA agreed with B that be, as solicitor of the company, should receive and accept a salary atRs . 1200 pot man instead ofsending hint an annual bill of costs, and world act for the company for that salary, in all matters connected with the company, with certain exceptione, it may be pertinent to determine what are the obligatione upon the parties to such an agreemont. It appears that for a yout least, the attorney would be bound to transact the general business of the company for that salary only, andA would be bound for the same period at least to koup him in his retainer and employment as an attorney and soliciter though A might have no work to do. Sintauty, medicat advisers may be employed at a salary to be ready in athe of illness , members of theatrical establishmedie in cục their labours should be nooded household servants in performance oftheir duty when their masters walk in these and other similar cases, the requirements of betied om vice 596

THEGAZETTE OPINDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011/PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART I SEC . 3 (ii) ]

him. It is admitted fact that the claimant preferred a writ before the High Court of Delhi seeking regularization of his servicewith the Corporation. Corporation asserted that claimant was getting his salaryfrom M/s Hingorani M. andCo., theretainer ofAccounts . Though an interim order was passed in that writ petition but subsequently it came tobe dismissed. Therefore , it is evident that in the writ petition the claimant failed to establish that he was an employee of the Corporation .

is distinct fromike miployment by the party employing. The tast nhách Ôngs to be applied in determining the question as to whether apometria employed in a commercial establishment is haber he is wholly or principally employed in connection with the business of the said establishment . As soon as it is shown that the emplosnient of the person is a Whoffy or principally connected with the bidinets if and Cublishment, he falls within the definition of an entembrate. Reference can be made to T. Devdalth ( 1972 ( 25 ) LK 226 ]

20. Though the claimant could not show that he was ever appointed by the Corporation , yet a peculiar fact has been brought over the record by him . He had proved documents Ex . WW1 / 1 to Ex. WW1 /7 . These documents are the applications submitted by the claimant to the Corporation forrelease of his travelling allowance for the month of July, 97, January, April , May, June and July, 98 Ex. WW1 /7 is an application submitted by the claimant for release of expenses incurred by him in performance ofhis duties with the Corporation. When perused it emerged over the record that he claimed traveling allowance from his residence to the office of the Corporation and sometimes from the office of the Corporation to his residence. His application was considered and granted .A sum.ofRs. 1520 was ordered to be released in his favour bythe Corporation . In the same manner this applications Ex. WW1 /5, Ex. WW1 /2 , Ex. WW1/ I , Ex. WW1 /4 and Ex . WW1/3 were granted for the month ofJanuary, April , May, June and July, 98 Consequently it is evident that for the period referred above the Corporation, sanctioned traveling allowance, incurred by the claimant for attending to his duties with the Corporation

27 pobunmilk boungpinyok, ithe is employed for wages inode ) indsonsestionigeitle the work of an andali dunent or ifheie diner thy omployed by the principal employer onwary wellitud or incidentalocpreliminaryrinettesboc preliminary to or connected with the world's the matterment or ifhe is employed by of through atomittite tanployer on the promises of the estetilchmami oroithis services are temporarily leatbelton tieto theprincipus employer by the person withouthui thẻ periferi tide services are so lant of feton kits billeathed innouanract ofservice. The terim also include boy person imployed forwages connected with the actiulsiration of the outablishment or any part , thegiarsiteter bakich tiste ofwithdeportentorbranch of with the purchase ofraw material Forothetistitution of sale ofthe products of the establishent) Referentevou be made to Gnanambikai Mitsi taabid ( 1974 (2 ) LL.35301: The word "employsel akarwtisii in rahat any perión wholly or mainly cutployed saa hindiges enfployee in or in connection with ary/ 006, bundoka wmillalatture carried onbyhim. Existence of a jural relationship ofmaster and vanthe ord " employee " . It contract of

theApex Chervisted Mouvie in which the she is ingiged by the Linde agrond tu quấy tiến họ cach ofkind, as agreed billica mens le dischaematolotionship of beling an anmployee il /ht other words, a folemionkhip bitsANG thứ đang là vẻ and him as that of master and soryant. Whered Condtietor employs a workumento do wide which is douttened toithird person, the workinda at the commboided would not , without sointing nord, οισία εντολη@ orAkimothethe third person. sid of raid cool of teast is boirag onse art of bayo

21. Question for consideration comes as to in what capacity the Corporation sanctioned travelling allowance , forthe perfod referred above in favour of the claimant . Whether he could have claimed those allowances from the Corporation, while being an employee of Retainer of Accounts ? Without being an employee ofthe Corporation , the claimant cannot put forward his claim for release of travelling allowance in his favour . Bygranting applications of the claimant, the Corporation conceded that there existed some relationship between it and the claimant. What were those relations is a proposition which the Corporation ought to have answered. The Corporation simply asserts , that he was an employee of the Retainer of Accounts , which assertion stands brushed aside byby the factthat Corporation opted to release travelling allowance in favour ofthe claimant. Therefore, the documents referred above make it clear that impliedly the Corporation established relationship of employer and employee between it reen it and the claimant.

In the label the law land in prosedents referred above would hearts tomad wja whaber claimant has been able to being it on the propol Matbaavos employed Claimant poncedes that no appointment dotecome inmadi in his favour by the Corporation. Bisanat hiencan Mubs Corporation used to zalouse salary in favout furthe arouk performed by

22. When relationship of employee and employer was established by the Corporation with the chainant, in that situation Hingorani M. and Co. was in a capacity ofa jurisdic person , who was interposed in between by the [ भाग 11-खंड3 (ii) ]

Corporation. Arrangement made by the Corporation in that regard cannot be termed as genuine. It was sham, bogus, ruse or camouflage, with a view to avoid legal relationship between the parties and to deny legal rights ofthe claimant. Therefore, it is concluded that relationship of employer and employee were there between the Corporation andthe claimant , since July, 1997. The claimsant hasbeen able to tilt the scale in his favour by proving the documents referred above. Consequently it is announced that relationship of employer and employee were there betweenthe parties . Issue is, therefore, answered in favour ofthe claimant and against the Corporation.

IssueNo.2.

23. Itwas pleaded on behalf ofthe Corporation that it is not an industry within the meaning of clause. (j ) of Section 2 of the Act . The claimant disputes that the Corporation is not an industry, as defined by the Act. To appreciate submissions of rival parties, it is expedient to have a glance on definition ofword " industry" , provided in clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Act, which definition is extracted thus: :

" Industry" means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service , employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation ofworkmen."

or 24. The definition of" industry" is both exhaustive and inclusive. It is in two parts . The first part says that it "means any business , trade ,undertaking, manufacture calling ofemployers" and then goes to say that it " includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workman. " Thus one part defined it from the stand point of the employer, and the other part from the stand point ofthe employees . The first part of the definition gives the statutory meaning of the industry, whereas the second part deliberately refers to several other items of industry and bring them in the definition in an inckisive way. The first part ofthe definition determines any industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities viz. business , trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling. The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarilydenotes . Bythis part of the definition any calling, employment, handicraft, industrial occupation or avocation of workmen is included in the concept of industry. This part gives extended connotation.

25. Gloss was put on the definition of word " industry" by the High Courts and the Apex Court time and again. The question as to what is "industry" has continuouslybaffled and perplexed the courts . A graph ofthe cases decided by the Apex Court , ifplotted on the background of the expression used in two parts of the 3Gl/11-34

115, 2011 / 25 , 1932

definition of "industry" , would my curve. There have boon various ratur volatile aree of les. The the efforts were made to evolve characteristics regarded as dep by test the Apex Court hat bom guided more by decision have centered atomnd the Sepply and Sewerage Board ( 1978Lab.LC. 778 Caurt reviewed the earlier decisions on the wide words encompassed in the de formulated positive and arguiva prin It would be expedient to reproduce. O pronounconsent of the Coust, in the vary the majority decision, handed down by Tyler, which are extracted thus :

" 1. " Industry" as defined in $.3 (3) and explained in Banerji (AIR 1953 S.C. 58) basa wide impo (a) Where ( i ) systematic activity, ( if) organized by Co-operation betwe the production andle goods and services calc erial or religious but p things or services grered to celestial prased or foods ) grima facie, there is an "industry" in that coterprise.

(b ) Absence of profit metive or gainful objective is irrelevant, be the venture in the public, joint, private or other settor (c) The true focus is functional and the docisive test is the future ofthe activity with special emphasis on the omployer employee relation

(d) Ifthe organization is a trade or busines it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking .

II. Although Section 2 (j ) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs , the re- meaning cannot be magnified to overreach itself.

(a) "Undertaking" mruit suffer a conte and amociational thankage an in Banerjee and in the judgment, also, service, calling and the yields the inferdite thet all

598

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

central personality, and the services are supplied free or at nominal cost and those who serve are not engaged, for remuneration or on the basis of master and servant relationship , then , the institution is not an industry even if stray servants , manual or technical , are hired. Such eleemosynary or like undertakings alone are exempt not other generosity, compassion, developmental passion or project.

IV. The dominant nature test:

activity passessing the triple elements in 1 (supra, although not trade or busincas, may still be ' industry' provided the nature of activity, viz. the employer-employee basis , bears resonablunce te what we find in trade or business . This takes into the fold industry undertaking , calling and services, adventures,adventures, " analogous to the carrying on the trade or business" .All features , other than the methodology of carrying on the activity viz in organizing the co-operation between employer and employee , may be dissunilas, it does not matter, if on the employment tects there is analogy.

III. Application of these guide of these guidelines shoushould not short of their logical reach by invocation of creeds , cults or fomer sense of incongruity or opter sense of motivation for or resultant of the economic operations. The ideology ofthe Act being industrial peace, regulation and resolution of industrial disputes between employer and workomen, the range of their statutory ideology must inform the reach of the statutory definition. Nothing less , nothing more .

(a) Where a complex of activities , some of which qualify for exemption, other not , involves employees on the total undertaking, some of whom are not "workmen" as in the University ofDelhi case (AIR 1963 S.C. 1873 ) or some departments are not productive ofgoods and services if isolated, even then , the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur(AIR 1960 S. C. 657) will be the true test. The whole undertaking will be industry although those who are not "workmen" by definition may not benefit by the status .

(a) The consequences are (i) profession, (ii) clobe (lii) odiacation institutions, ( iv) co- research institutes, (vi) charitable projects and (vii ) othe Kindered udventures , if they fulfil the triple tests Hined in 1 ( supra), cannotbe exempod from the scope of Section 2 (j ) .

(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses , sovereign functions , strictly understood (alone) qualify for exemption, not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaking by govt. or statutory bodies.

(c) Even in department discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable ; then they can be considered to come within S.2 (j ) .

(b) A restricted oategory of professions, chibe , co -optantivopentivesativessandand even gurukulas and little researchresearch labs may qualify for exemption if in simple ventures , substantially, and going by the dominant dature criterion, substantively no employees are entertained but in menial mutters , marginal employees are hired without destroying the non employee character of the uriit .

(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions may remove from the scope of the all categories which otherwsie maybe covered thereby.

(c) If, in a pious or akruistic mission many amploy themselves , free or for small honoraria or like return , mainly drawn by sharing in the purpose or cause, such as lawyers vohunteering to run a free Jagai servions clinicclinic or doctors serving in their meate hours in a free medical centre or ashramites working at the bidding of the holiness , divinity or like

V We overrule Safdarjung ( AIR 1970S. C. 1407), Solicitors , case (AIR 1962 S. C. 1080 ) , Gymkhana (AIR 1968. S. C. 554) , Delhi university (AIR 1963 S. C. 1873 ), Dhanraj Giriji Hospital (AIR 1975 SC 2032) and other rulings whose ratio runs counter to the principles enunciated above, and the Hospital Mazdoor Sabha ( AIR 1960 SC 610) is hereby rehabilitated. " 1 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

26.Principles laid down in Bangalore Water Supply and SewerageBoard ( supra) hold ground. Therefore, the controversy raised will be adjudicated in view of the law laid by the Apex Court in the precedent referred above. The Corporation agitates that it is not an Industry. The viewpoint heldbythe Corporation is that no profit motive activities are being carried on by it. No business is being run, hence the Corporation cannot be termed as an "industry".Except the facts referred above, the Corporation nowhere projects any other factors to lay emphasis on the proposition that it is not an ' industry' . Contra to it the claimant agitates that the Corporation is an ' industry'

29. As detailed above, the Corporation maul of not being an industry rarely on the count turno motive activities wore being carried on. Lack ofbusine profit motive or capital investment would not take out the Corporation from the swoop of definitiondefiniti of word industry', since other standards laid by the Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply and Seworage Disposal Board (supra) stand satisfied. The activThe activities carried on by the Corporation are systematic for rendering mallerial services. to the community at large, with the help of its employees. Therefore , absence of profit motive will not take out the activities ofthe' corporation' from the ambit ofthe definition of an ' industry' given in clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Act. It is concluded that the Corporation is an ' industry' within the meaning of clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Act and contention raised in that regard is wounded.

30. The Corporation agitatos that decision of the High Court on the writ petition operates as rem-jedients which contention is rebutted by the claimant . Question for consideration comes as to whether adjudication by the High Court in writ petition operates as res-judicata. For an answer, the Tribunal has to consider as to whether principles of res -judicata can be invoked. It is well sottled that entire Code ofCivil Procedure , 1908 (in short the Code) isnot applicable to an industrial adjudication , yet principles of res -judicata laid down under section 11 of the Code are applicable wherever possible . In Straw Board Manufacturing Company Ltd. [ 1974 ( 1 ) LLJ499] the Apex Court observed:

27. InBarodaBorough Municipality [ 1957 (1 ) LEJ 8] the Apex Court held that though municipal activity could not be truly regarded as business or trade, yet it would fall within the scope of expression 'underthking". Non-profit undertaking of the municipality were included in the concept of ' industry ' even if there is no private enterprise. The court reiterated that branches ofwork that canbe regarded as analogous to carrying out of a trade or business would fail within the meaning of ' industry' in clause (j) ofSection 2 oftheAct. In reaching the decision, the Apex Court relied precedent în D. N. Banerji (supra) and ruled that it would be sufficient that the activity is an "undertaking analogous to the carrying on of a trade or business and involves cooperation between the employers and employees . This result was reached by extending the meaning of the expression ' undertaking' to cover adventures not strictly trade or business but ' objects very similar' . Reference can also be made to Madras Gymkhana ClubEmployees' Union (supra).

"This is so since multiplicity of fitigation , agitation and re -agitation of the same dispute at isane betweenthe same amployer and his employens will not be conducive to industrial poace which is principle object of all labour legislation bearing on industrial adjudication but in holding that the. principles ofres -judicata is applesoje to a particular case, operating consideration is whether a matter in dispute in a subsequent case had earlier boon directly substantially in issue between the same paufer and the same has been heard and felly decided by the Tribunal . The earlier question of issue mint he relevant and germane in deterrejning question of res -judicata in subsequent proceedings . The real character of the controversy between the parties is the determining factor and in complex and manifold one relation between the labour and capital giving rise to diverse kind of ruptares of varying guances nocast. mrule can be laid down . Some distinction ofwhatever shade of magnitude may have to be borne in mind in compliance ofthe principles of res judicata in industrial adjudication in contraventin to civil proceedings

28. In Indian Standard Institute [ 1966 ( 1 ) LLJ33 )] theApex Court suggested that in order to be recognized as an undertaking analogous to trade or business, the activity must be an economical activity in the sense that it isproductive of material goods or material services. In Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (supra), the ApexCourt laid down that an activity systematically or habitually undertaken for the production or distribution ofgoods for rendering material services to the commurity at large or a part of such community with the help of employees is an undertaking . An industry' thus was said to involve cooperation between the employer and employee for the object of satisfying material human needs butnot for oneself nor for pleasure nor necessity for profit . Lack ofbusiness and profit motive or capital investment would not take out an activity from the sweep of industry' . Ifother conditions are satisfied, it is the activity in question which attracts the definition and the absence of investment ofany capital or the fact that the activity is conducted for profitmotive or not, would not make material difference. Conversely mere existence of profit moltive will not necessarily convert the activity into "industry" if other tests are not satisfied.

31. In Hindustan Liver Ltd. ( 1984 Lab. LC. 276) sc Apex Court laid that "though this in highly technical 600

[PART II SEC. 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

becomes final and shall not cease to be operative after lapse of one year. It cannot be terminated by a notice under Sub-section (6) ofSection 19 ofthe Act . That dispute cannot be referred to adjudication subsequently . The principles of res -judicata, as enunciated in Burn and Company Ltd. [ 1957 (1) LLJ 226] would apply to such a casewith full force.

concept ofcivil justice may be loopt in precise confined linets in the follofis ndleation which must as far as possibile b technicalities which sai in deputes . It can safely be goutsores judicata canbe availed dicata ofto seattle amy amennt at rising industrial disputes repeatedly in defience of perative settlements and awards"

32. In Punjab Cooperative Bank Ltd. [ 1975 ( II ] LLJ 373 ] the Apex Camelde validity of the application of principles of re an issue raised in subsequent pendoodinga under section 33 ( C) (2 ) of the Ack which had handy han decided by a competent labour court i industrial dispute. In BombayGas Captpany Lad ( 1975 (11 ) Court had gone to the calent ofwyen applying principles ofconstructive posjedica . Pugh Alegiriswami , speaking for the court heav

34. The Corporation had relied order dated 11-11-99 passed by the High Court on contempt petition , moved by the claimant . Order which resulted in disposal of the writ petition has not been filed by either of the parties . It seems that when contempt petition was dismissedby High Court of Delhi , the claimant opted not to pursue the writ petition . His writ petition came to be dismissed with liberty to him to approach the authorities under the Act . It emerges that issues were left open to be adjudicated by this Tribunal , when High Court disposed ofthe writ petition filed by the claimant . Under these circumstances, it is evident that the writ petition had not resulted into adjudication of the controversy on merits . Therefore, disposal of the writ petition by the High Court ofDelhi will not stop the claimant to agitate issues before thisTribunal . Contention advanced by the Corporation is discarded on that issue too .

"The dovrine of res- judicata is a wholesome one which is replicable not corely to matters covered the provisions of the Code of CivilCode ofCivil Procedure but to all Digatione. It proceeds on the principle that there should be not cessary litigation and ices are open to parties should alt beput firvend at the same time , provided no confusion is likely terorist by so putting forward

35. Order Ex. WW1 /M2 , passed by High Court of Delhi on 11th of November, 1999 has been proved by the Corporation. This order was passed, disposing of contempt petition moved by the claimant . As detailed above an interim order was passed and during continuarice of the said order services of the claimant were dispensed with , by Retainer ofAccount , at the instance of the Corporation. Asdetailed in the order, letter dated 7th ofJune , 1990 was writtenby theCorporation to the claimant, which reads as under:

"It is noticed that you are sitting in the IRFC premises without permission , only regular employees of Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC) and the persons deputed by and belonging to agencies like Registrars , Retainers ete. for doing their work authorised by IRFC, are permittedto sit and work in the IREC premises . We have been informedby your employer i.e. M/ s Hingorani M and Co.(HMC) who are also IRFC's Retainers for Accounts, that you have been withdrawn from your present assignment with IRFC and that they would be requiring your services in their office , IRFC is a financial institution dealing with security documents . You are , therefore , not permitted to sit in the IRFC premises since you are not authorised by M/ s H.M.C. to handle any work.

While you were asked to leave the premises , there being no violation of Hon'ble High Court's orders , you threatened that you would not leave the 33. In Mumbai Kamgar Sabha [ 1976 (II) LLJ 186] , commenting on the above cose, justice Krishna Iyer toerved that, it clear bow, so long as theLap long as the above ruling stands, that inghotrial litigation is to axception to the uine ofres-judicata" . ut "the extension of etive res -judicata to by special methodology and considerations of bere collective bargaining ce over formalised rules causes of a BombayGas Company LLed or the rasse tom sui contests , specific on particular issues" , but Waswas distinguished that case that " If the of the items in respect d, it is open to them to ation was interpreted had been raised, after bir of res -judicata could have been of attracting principles of res- judicate, the issue be the bre proceedings must be common. The real charnone of controversy between the An award relating to imation of services ofservices of a workman, after being given any continuing obligation oper. The award, therefore, terminatin rties For the premises unless you are given a letter in writing to do soas advised by your lawyer. You are however, informed that IRFC shall present its case and shall abide by all the directions of the Court.

Adetailed letter is being given to you so as to enable you to appreciate the position and to maintain discipline in the office premises ofIRFC as otherwise there may be wrong signals . Maintaining discipline in the office is the foremost duty of every management. This is communicated to you, without prejudice to the case ofIRFC in the writ petitionNo. 3517 of 1999 and CMP. No. 7166/99 .While we are not allowing you to come to this office, it should not be takento mean that your services are dispensed with, because you have never been in the services ofthe IRFC.

IfM/sHMCwant you to work for them in IRFC, please bring the authority letter from them." 36. The Corporation had proved letter Ex. MW1/2, written by the Retainer of Accounts to the claimant. Ex. MW1/2 highlights that the Retainer ofAccounts took a decision to withdraw the claimant from his assignment with the Corporation . He was advised to hand over all relevant papers and files to Ms. Swati and report back to the Company of Retainer of Accounts immediately. Issuance ofthis letter could raise an uproar, which led the claimant to move contempt petition before High Court of Delhi and subsequently the authorities under the Act for making a reference ofthe dispute to this Tribunal . Whether itwas within the competence of the Retainer ofAccounts to withdraw the claimant from his assignment with the Corporation, when Corporation had established direct relationship ofemployer and entployee with him ? Answer lies in negative. Retainer ofAccounts was not competent towithdraw him from his assignment with the Corporation, whentheCorporation opted to establish direct relationship ofemployer and employee between the parties . Therefore, letter Ex. MW1 /2 was an instrument which was initiatedat the instance of the Corporation. The claimant opted to visit premises ofthe Corporation for performance ofhis duties and that proposition led the Corporation to write letter referred above . Consequently it is evident that the Corporationwasbehind the curtain when Ex. MW1/2 was writtenby Retainer ofAccounts to the claimant. In fact and reality it was the Corporation who snapped relationship ofemployer and employee between it and the claimant.

37. Claimant unfolds in his testimony that he joined servicewith the Corporation in April, 97 and served them continuouslytillMay, 1999. He announced that on28th of May, 99 hewas not allowed to join his duties. When his testimonywas purified by an ordeal ofcross examination, the Corporation simply took a stand that he was an employee of the Retainer ofAccounti. As detailed theCorporation entitlished disut version hip of và and employée with the claimant on of claimant could highlight that be terved the Ceip continuouslytill 2th of May, 1999. Thurifing, it is that sinceJuly, 97 till28-5-99 Die chanellt has in condu servicewith the Corporation

38. " Continuous Service " has boon defined by Section 25-B oftheAct. Under sub-section ( 1 ) of the said section, "continuous service for a period may comprise of two period viz . ( i) uninterrupted servion, and ( ii ) interrupted service on account of ( a) sistems . (b ) authorized leave, (c) an accident, (d) a strike width is not legal, ( e ) a lock-out, and (f) a cessation ofwork that is not due to any fault on the part of the worfman, shall be included in the " continuous service. " Set (2) of the said section introduces a fiction to the offibct that even if a workman is not in " continuous servic meaning ofclause ( 1 ) for a period of one your or six months, he shall bedeemed to in continuous service for thet period under an employer if he has actually worked fat the days specified in clauses (a) and (b ) thereof. In Vijay Kame Majoo (1968 Lab . I.C. 1180) it was bell that our year's period contemplated by sub- section (2) Pamided a unik ofmeasure and ifduring that unit ofmoeniedie paid of service actually rendered by the workomen if 200- days, then he can be considered to have rehband one your's continuous service for the purpose of the section. The idea is that ifwithin a unit period of arte your a quesoffend put in at least 240 days of service, then he must got the benefit conferredby the Act:

39. An enquiry has to be made to find out whodier the workman has actually worked for not less than 240 days during a period of 12 calendar monitis imenetletely preceding the retrenchment. As mafolded by the theimant he rendered continuous service for 240 days wi the Corporation 12 months preceding the date when relationship of employer and employee were Consequently it is evident that the claimant has to establish that he rendred continuous service than a year with the Corporation .

40.At the cost of repetition, it isis saidsaid thatth Yntender Kumarwas retrenched on 28-5-99. He was engaged by the Corporation inJuly, 1997. The Corporation.no whave chaims that his service was interrupted for any reason of those detailed in sab- section ( 1 ) of Section 250-ofthe A He renderedmore than 240 days continuousdays continuous servios the period of 12 calendarcalendar months mandatel) thedate ofhis retrenchment viz. 28th of May, is covered within the definition of "contin as enacted in Section 25 - B of the Act. T appropriate to conchide t status of an industrial employee, on service ofthree years with the ma 602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

41. Shri Yatender Kumar asserts that he was employed as an Accountant by the muongement . On the ther hand Mis . Khtatin projects that Yntender: Kumarwas not employed as an Accountant . She went on to depose thatat since Yatender Kumar waswas workingwaking vwith M/ s Hingorani M. and Co. as an Acconsustant for the Corporation , who wereRetainers for Accounts from 1997 till 3-6-1999, hence He is not an employee ofthe Corporation. Evidence was appreciated while adjudicating the facts in proceding sections and it was held that though Yatender Kumar was employed as an Accountant with M/ s Hingorani M. and Co.,yer direct relationship ofemployer and employee were established, as announced above, the performed functions ofanAccountant for more than 2 years,

42. Shri Yatender Kumar projects that his services were dispensed with on 28-5-99, Ms. Khuntia nowhere presems that notice or pay in lien thereof was givento Yatender Kumar, while terminating his services . Retrenchment compensation was not paid to him . The management was under an obligation to pay him compensation at the time of retrenchment . Payment of retrenchment compensation is a condition precedent to a valid order of retrenchment Procodents in BombayUnion of Journalists case [ 1964 ( 1 ) LLJ 351 ] , Adaishwar Laal ( 1970 Lah. 1.C. 936) and B. M. Oupta [ 1979 ( 1) LLJ 168] announce that sabsequent payment of compensation can not validate an invalid order of retronchiment. As retrenchment compensation was not paid to Yatender Kumar, consequently action of the managerment falls within the mischiefof Section 23 -F of theAct.

43. It is not the case of the Corporation that when service ofthe claimant were dingensed with a notice for a period of one month waiswas served upon him or he was paid in lieu thereof. No evidence has been brought over the record that retrenchmorit compensation was paid to the claimant, when bis services was dispensed with . On this the claimant asserts that on 28-5-97 he was not allowed to joinhithis duties and letter dated 7th of June, 99 was written to him by the Corporation. In order ExEx WW1 /M2, High Court haddetailed the contents of the letter written by the claimant to the Corporation on 15-6-99 , which are reproduced thus:

Re: Your Letter No. IRFC/ADMN, DATED : 1-6-99..

am in receipt of your above mentioned letter directing me not to sit in the IRFC premises.

At the outset I would like to point ont that your above mentioned letter is in clear and categories violation ofthe orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated 28-5-99 witich orders you not to dispense with my services . However, by not permitting to sit in the IRFC premises you are latantly end purposely floating the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court.

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] In the said letter you have mentioned that only regular employees are entitled to sit in the IRFC premises . You forget that CW 3517/99 filed by me is for regularization of my services . In any event you have been restrained from terminating my services bythe Hon'ble Delhi High Court .

I would also like to once again reiterate that as pointed outby me in CW 3517/99 my employers are notM/s . Hingorani and Co. but IRFC . You are simply trying to circumvent your contractual and legal obligations towards your temporary employees .

In this connection you have lodged a false and fraudulent FIRagainst me at the R. K. Puram Police Station alleging that I have threatened to hurt and bodily harın some employees of IRFC . The local police was also called in order to harass and intimidate me. " Subsequently on 9-6-99 the local police took me. Shri S. K. Rathi and Shri Rajinder Prasad (all petitioners before the Delhi High Court) to the Police Station R. K. Puram from the I.R.F.C. office. At your instance the local Police have told us that ifwe dare enter the IRFC office they would not only harm us bodily but also implicate us in false cases.

I have also been informedby my colleagues in IRFC that you are planning to further implicate me in fraudulent police cases. Your only objective in doing so is to make me withdraw CW 3517/99 filed by me against IRFC. You will therefore go to any lengthto circumvent the orders of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. :

I , therefore, call upon you to withdraw your letter dated 7-6-99 with immediate effect failing which ! shall have no option left but to approach the Hon'ble Delhi High court against you for committing contempt ofCourt. You are willfully disobeying the order ofthe Hon'ble Delhi High Court dated28-5-99 passed on CW 3517/99 and are , therefore, liable to be punished for the same . "

Therefore, it is emerging over the record that neither notice nor pay in lieu thereof nor retrenchment compensation was paid to the claimant by the Corporation , whenhis services were dispensed with on 28th of May, 99. Consequently it is evident that retenchment of the claimant is violative of the provisions of Section 25 -F of theAct.

44. When services of the claimant were retrenched in violation of the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act , heisentitled to reinstatement in service . Shri Kapur argued that Corporation is a Government of India Undertaking , which has rules of recruitment . According to him , when claimant was engaged in violation of rules ofrecruitment, he is not entitled to reinstatement of service , since it would amount to abrogation of those rules . Sari Rana presents that when Mr. M. Kannan joined service ofthe Corporation after termination of services of the claimant and his services havebeen regularized, it amounts to violation of provisions of Sestion 25 -H. of the Act, which casts an obligation on the Corporation to give an opportunity to the claimant for reemployment , as and when it propose to -employ some one . He presents that the said legal obligation was violated by the Corporation . In her testimony Ms. Khuntia does not dispute that Shri M. Kannon is an employee of the Corporation. No issues were raised on theground that Shri Kannon was engaged after termination of the services of the claimant and his services stands regularized. Consequently it is emerging over the record that after termination of the services of the claimant, the Corporation engaged Mr. Kannon and regularized his services also .

guaranteedbyArticle 14 of the Constitution. In Pooran Chandra Pandey ( supra ) there were two sets of employees who were daily wagers , that is ( 1 ) the original employees oftheU.P. State electricity Board and (ii ) the employees of the society, who subsequently became employees of the Electricity Board . The High Court ruled that there was no ground for discriminating between the two sets of empoloyees . When issue reached the Apex Court it was ruled that since the parties were all appoimed in the society before4th ofMay, 1990 , they cannot be denied benefit of the decision of the Electricity Board dated 28th of November , 1996, permitting regularization ofthe employees ofthe ElectricityBoard who were working from before-4-5- 1990. Itwas announced that to take a contrary view would violateArticle 14 of the Constitution . The courts cannot, read Uma Devi case in a manner which will make it in conflict withArticle 14 of the Constitution. Thus the Apox Court made it clear in Pooran Chandra Pandey ( opt ) that when regularization is to be ordered in pursuance ofArticle 14 of the Constitution precedent laid dawn in Uma Dovi will not come in between .

45. Shri Kannan , who was engaged after termination of the service of the claimant, would rank junior to the claimant. When a junior to the claimant has been regularized in the roposition it does not lie in the mouth oftheCorporation to say that service ofthe claimant cannot be reinstated since it would amount to abrogate recruitment rules . Can management be permitted to treat equals differently ? Answer lies in negative . In Bal Kishan [ 1990 (1 ) LLJ 61 ] the Apex Court announced that no junior shall be confirmed or promoted without considering the case of his senior. The observations made bynthe Apex Court are reproduced thus:

47. Relying law laid in Pooran Chandra Pandey (supra) , it is announced that it does not lie in the mouth of the management to seek refuse in the principles oflaw Inid in Uma Devi with a view to deny equality to the claimant . Therefore , it is commanded that claimant, namely, Shri Yatender Kumar would be regularized in the service by the management on the same standards on which Me Kanto was regularized . He wouldbe regularized from the dato whenever vacancies was available for him and in any eventuality not later from the date when services ofMr. Kannanwere regularized. ?

"In service, there could be only one norm for conferment or promotion of persons belonging to the same cadre . No junior shall be confirmed or promoted without considering the case ofhis senior . Any deviation from this principle will have demoralizing effect in service apart from their being contrary to Article 16( 1 ) of the Constitution."

as towhether 48. Services of the claimant wore dispensedwith in violation of the provisions of Section 25 -B of the Act. Circumstances projected by the claimant would shoy justification for a command to the managousent to re his services .However , it is to be considered as to wi the claimant was gainfully employed in the intervening period.Though Yatender Kumar Sharma claimed that he is unemployed since the date of his termination, yet no cogent evidence was produced by him in that behalf. Consequently, this Tribunal has to a consider quantum of wages, which can be awarded to the claimpet for the intervening period . No definite yardstick for measuring the quantum ofwages / compensation is available .available. In S. S. Shetty [ 1957 ( II ) LLJ 696] the Apex Court indicated some relevant factors which an adjudicator has to take into account in computing compensation in lieu of reinstatement, in the following words:

46. The management projected that in Uma Devi [2006 (4 ) SCC 1 ] the Apex Court ruled that a person who entered service dehors the rules has no right for regularization or continuance in service . The principle of law laid by the Apex Court in the aforesaid case is not a matter ofdispute. Whether the law so laid would allow the management to discriminate the claimants from Shri M. Kannan, who was junfor to him and placed on similar padestal ? Such a proposition was considered by the Apex Court in Pooran Chandra. Pandey [2007 ( 12) Scale 304 ), wherein it was announced that precedent in Uma Devi (supra) cannot be applied mechanically without considering facts of a particular case . In Uma Devi it was ruled that a person , who entered the government service dehors rules cannot claim as right for continuance or regularization of service . However , the said decision nowhere speaks of a case where regularization in service has been sought in pursuance of fundamental rights

"The industrial Tribunal would have to take lato account the terms and conditions of conteyn the tenere of service , the possibility of treatin of the employment at the latence of al the possibility of retrenchiment by the employer or 604

[PART II SBC. 3(ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

resignation or retirement by the workman and even of the employer foeming to exist or of the workman boles saindod serious benefits including reinstatement under the tonte of fature awards by Industrial Tribunal in the event of industrialdisputes ansing between the parties .... In computing the money value of the s of reinstatement, mond sho have to take một viên, of what his salary, benef sigld be till là amined the age of supermanunta of such benefits would have to be competed to them the date when red under the terms of, the award.

Having regard to the considerations detailed auto the money value alove. of this benefit of reimintient awarded to the appellant with inathemation) exactitude and the best that any tribunal or court would do under the circumstances would be to make as correct as estimate as is postie bawing, of course in mind all the relevant fhotors pro anoon".

compensation equivalent to two year salary of the employee awarded by the Industrial Tribunal was reduced by the Supreme Court to an amount equivalent to one year salary of the employee in view of the fact that she had been in service with the employer only for 5months and also took into consideration the unusual manner of her appointment at the instance of the Chief Minister of the State. In A. K. Roy [ 1970 (1 ) LLJ 228) ] compensation equivalent to two years salary last drawn by the workmen was held to be fair and proper to meet the ends ofjustice. InAnil Kumar Chakaraborty [ 1962 (II ) LLJ 483 ] the Court converted the award of reinstatement into compensation ofa sum ofRs . 50,000 as just and faircompensation in full satisfaction of all his claims for wrongful dismissal from service. In O. P. Bhandari [ 1986 ( IF) LLJ 509 ] , the Apex Court observed that it was a fit case for grant of compensation inview ofreinstatement. The Court awarded compensation equivalent to 3.33 years salary as reasonable. In M. K. Aggarwal ( 1988 Lab. I. C. 380), the Apex Court though confirmed the order of reinstatement yet restricted the back salary to 50% of what would otherwise be payable to the employee . In Yashveer Singh (1993 Lab. I. C. 44) the Court directed payment ofRs .75,000 inview ofreinstatement with backwages. InNaval Kishor [1984 (II) LLJ 473 ] theApex Court observed that in view of the special circumstances of the case adequate compensation wouldbe in the interest of the appellant. A sum ofRs . 2 lac was awarded as compensation in lieu of reinstatement . In Sant Raj [ 1985 (II) LLJ 19] a sum ofRs . 2 Lacwas awarded as compensation in lieu ofreinstatement . In Chandu Lal ( 1985 Lab . I. C. 1225) a compensation of Rs . 2 lac by way of back wages in lieu of reinstatement 'was awarded. In Ras Bihari ( 1988 Lab . I. C. 107) a compensation of Rs . 65,000 was granted in lieu of reinstatement, since the employee was gainfully employed elsewhere . InV. V. Rao ( 1991 Lab . I. C. 1650) a compensation ofRs . 2.50 lac was awarded in lieu of reinstatement.

49. A Divisional Beach older Paina High Court in B. Choudhary Vs. Presiding Offmear, Labour Court , Jamshedpur (1988 ) lab . L... 1755 ( 1755) deduced certain guidelines which have to be borne teated in determining the quantum of coλμαστετίσε νέε. ( 1 ) the back wages receivalle; ( 18 ) comprovadon tarvation of tof thejob with future prospect and obtabakelity of alternative employment; ( ii) employer to pay and the nature ; (vi) gainful employment in animation of Jainages ; and (viii) circumstances lending ant and the past conduct. These factors are only thetrative and not exhaustive. In addition to the amint of compensation, it is also within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to award interest on the amount determined as compensation. Furthermore , the rate of such interest is niso in the discretion of the Tribunal. Rofaient can be made to Tabesh1 Process,Shiv

51. Taking into account all these aspects , I am of the considered view that the Corporation is to be commanded to reinstatement the claimant in its services with continuity and 25 % back wages from the date of termination till the date of his reinstatement. Since his junior has been regularized in service. The Corporation shall also regularize service of the claimant from the date hisjunior Mr. Kannon was regularized in service . An award is accordingly passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

50. In Artan Oil Coa. Lat. ( 1980 ( 1 ) LLJ587] theApex Court took into biteunthitount counturvelling facts that the employer had paid outain rumajo debe workmen and her own caning in the alternative employment and ordered that " it would be thie and just so tiroot the appellant a substantiel sumu as compensation to her" , In Utkal Machinery Ltd. [ 1966 ( 1 ) LL ) 399 ] the amount of Dated:15-10-2010 Dr. R. K. YADAV, PresidingOfficer [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 20117पौष 25, 1932

नईदिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2010

"Whether the action of the management ofOrientsi Insurance Company Ltd. in imposing the punishment ofdismissing the services of Shri Chander Parkash S/o Shri Khilla Ram, Ex-Poonw.e.f. 19-10-2001 is logal and justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman'is entitled to and from which date ?" का. आ. 170.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 'का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरियंटल इंश्योरेन्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 147/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. पूल -17012/6/2003-आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 23rd December, 2010

After receiving the reference parties were informed. Parties appearedand filed their respective pleadings . The case of the workman in nut shell is that he was appointed as apeon in Oriental Insurance Company Limited vide letter dated 10-3-1989 by the Regional Manager oftheBank. He wasdrawing the salary ofRs . 5,000 per month. His services were confirmedbythe Regional Manager vide letter dated 25-8-1989. The workman has also qualifiedthe test ofclerk grade:Because no post was lying vacant, he was nοι promoted as clerk and was in the waiting list. Due to illness he had remain on leave during the year 1996 to 1999 for 452 days. The workman was charge sheeted for his remaining absent for452days . Enquiry was conducted and the charge was alleged to be proved against him . He was dismissed from the services on 19-1-2001.

S.O. 170.-In pursuance ofSection 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 147/2003) of the CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court- 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofOriental Insurance Company Ltd. and their workman,which was received by the Central Government on22-12-2010

[No. L- 17012/6/2003- IR(B-I ) ] RAMESH SINGH, DeskOfficer

ANNEXURE

It is the contention of the workman that his services were illegally terminated, because the enquiry was conducted against the principle of natural justice. The instances ofviolation of principle of natural justice have beenmentioned in the statement of claim in detail. I am not mentioning them because at the later stage the workman has considered and admitted that enquiry was fairly conducted.

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case L. D. No. 147/2003

Shri Chander Parkash, S/o Shri Khilla Ram, 705 , Prem Nagar, GhumarMandi , Ludhiana- 141008 .

Applicant

Versus

The RegionalManager, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. , SCO No. 109-111 , Sector- 17D, Chandigarh- 160017. .....Respondent

APPEARANCES:

For the Workman :Shri B.N. Sehgal

For theManagement : Shri R. K. Chopra

AWARD

Passed on: 10-12-2010

The management appeared and contested the claim of the workman by filing written statement. It is the contention of the management that workman remained absent unauthorizedly from 1996.99 for 452 days without prior sanctioning the leave . A proper and fair enquiry was conductedand after considering the nature of misconduct be was rightly dismissed from the services . Both of the parties were heard on issue of fairness of enquiry on 22-2-2010 . This Tribunal vide order dated 22-2-2010 after affording the opportunity of being heard to both of the parties held the enquiry fair, proper and in accordance with theprinciple ofnatural justice . Vide order dated.22-2-2010 opportunity for adducing evidence was afforded to both oftheparties on perversity in decision making of the enquiry officer and on quantum of punishment. Both ofthe parties informed this Tribunal on 22-2-2010 that they were not interested in adducing any further evidence on the issue of perversity, if any in decision making of the enquiry officer and on quantum of punishment awarded by the disciplinary authority. Accordingly, the file was Hated for arguments.

Partieswere heard at length . Fact admisted need not tobeproved. In para No. 4 ofthe claim it is mentioned by the workman that due to bis illness he remained on leave during the year 1996-1999 for 452 days . The workman has Government of India, vide Notification No.L -17012/ 6/2003-[IR(B- 1) ] , dated 31-7-2003 by exercising its power under Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act (theAct in short) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

3G1/11-35 604

failed to prove that his leave were sanctioned for the said period.

The workman was given the charge sheet as follows:

( 1 ). He has remained unsathorizedly absent without prior permission or sanction of leave for 452 days during the period thosh 23-10-1996to 10-8-1999 as mentionedbelow

Period

No. of Days

38 23-10-961029-11-96

10-12-96

30-12-96to27-2-97

60 19-5-97 to22-5-97

6. 20-6-97 to25-6-97

9 30-6-97 to8-7-97

21-10-97 to 24-10-97

4 4-11-97 to 7-11-97

2 17-11-97 to18-11-97

5. 8-12-97 to 12-12-97

3 29-12-97 to 31-12-97

2 25-2-98 to26-2-98

19 2-3-98 10 20-3-98

86 15-4-98109-7-98

6-1-9910 12-1-99

202 21-1-99 to 10-8-99

Total:

452days (2) He has abandoned his post as no intimation or information in writing was received in office, from him during his unauthorized absence from 21-1-1999to 9-8-1999

As stated earlier, that enquiry conducted by the enquiry officer has been held to be fair and proper. It is admitted by the workman that in a set of three years he absented (remain on leave) for452 days. Prior to 21-1-1999 to 10-9-1999, the workman remained absent for 202 days continuously. The workmen as stated earlier has been absented some time for a day only and some time for two days . The management has contended that because of unauthorized absence of the workman , work culture of the company has been affected. Unauthorized absence frustrates the very purpose ofmaking public appointments .

THEGAZEITE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

[PART I SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Inspite ofthe above contention of the management , the punishment awarded to the workman should proportionate to the committed misconduct .

Learned counsel for the workman has filed and relied upon the following case laws:

(1 ) LIC of India Vs. R. Suresh , 2008 (2) SCT 664 (SC).

(2) Inspector Prem Chand Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and others , 2007 (4) SLR240 (SC). (3) Colour-Chem. Ltd. Vs. A. L. Alaspurkar, 1998 ( 1 ) SCT 757 (SC) .

(4) Narinder Mohan Arya Vs. United India Insurance Ltd. and others .

(5) M. V. Bijlani Vs. Union of India and Others , 2008 (4) SCR711 ( SC) .

(6) Joginder Pal Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, 1996 ( 1 ) SCT 436 ( Pb . and Haryana High Court)..

(7) Haryana State Vs. Dharampal, 2001 ( 1 ) SCT 229 (Pb . and Haryana High Court) .

(8) Jagdish Singh Vs. Punjab Engineering College and others , 2009 ( 121 ) FLR 984 (SC).. I have gone through the principle laid down in all above case laws . The management of the Insurance Co. has referred 2007 ( 4) (SC) SLR 240 Inspector Prem Chand Vs. Government of NCT ofDelhi and others which is also relied upon by the learned counsel for the workman on the issue of nature of misconduct on unauthorized absence . The management has contended that it is case of habitual absenteeism and accordingly the lenient punishment as ordered to be awarded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Inspector Prem Chand's case cannot be considered. In the case ofhabitual absenteeism , strict and harsh punishment should be awarded.

On perusal of the entire material on récord , it is specifically made clear that the issue of fairness ofenquiry has already been decided by this Tribunal vide order dated 22-2-2010.Vide order 22-2-2010, the enquiry has been held to be fair, reasonable and proper . Meaning thereby, this Tribunal vide order dated 22-2-2010 has held that a fair procedure was adopted by the enquiry officer and all possible opportunity of hearing was given to workman. Onthe perversity, if any, in decision making and on quantum of punishment , both of the parties were afforded the opportunity to adduce evidence . None of party chooses to file/adduce any evidence and it was requested to dispose off the same on the basis of enquiry proceedings and enquiry report.

On perusal of the entire enquiry proceedings and enquiry report, it is evidently clear that for the period [ भाग. म-खंड-3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/पौष 25, 1932

w.e.f. 21-1-99 to 10-8-99 for the absence of 202 days continuously, it is reported that the workman was ill . The cumulative effect of the evidence of the management and the evidence in defence during enquiry is that during this period ofabsence, the workman was seriously ill. This fact has also come to the notice of the Tribunal that one staff member of the company visited the house of the workman and informed the branch manager that the workman is seriously ill . Meaning thereby, that the cause of absence was the ailment of the workman . It is true that workman has not applied for medical leave but the departmental proceedings run on the basis of justice , equity and good conscious . Equity, justice and good conscious requires that once this fact came to the notice ofthe enquiry officer that the absence of the workman was due to the ailment of the workman , he should have conducted the enquiry in likemanner.

During arguments , it is admitted by both of the parties that workman could not survive and thereafter died with the same ailment . Iftrue facts lacks communication , it does not permit the authorities of the company for harsh punishment . Thus , findings given by the enquiry officer regarding unauthorized absent are perverse because it had come to the notice of the enquiry officer during enquiry that the workman was seriously ill and has ailment was the cause of absence . The ailment was of such a nature that workman could not survive .

Section 11A of the 1.D. Act, 1947 empowers this Tribunal that in rare and sparing cases , this Tribunal can invoke tnejurisdiction to reduce /change/replace/substitute the punishment awarded to the workman by the disciplinary authority. It is the settled principle ofservice jurisprudence that the jurisdiction u/s 11A should be invoked only in the cases if it warrants this Tribunal that non - invoking the jurisdiction will result in failure ofjustice and mis - carriage ofjustice . In spite of knowing the cause of absence , the management has dismissed the services of Shri Chander. Prakash which was as per Inspector Prem Chand's case a very harsh punishment . The workman has not abandoned the job but was prevented to attend the office due to the ailment.

As stated earlier, if the fact of ailment has come to the notice of the enquiry officer and disciplinary authority, the enquiry should have been conducted in the same manner. The enquiry officer and disciplinary authority, both, failed to appreciate the fact of ailment of the workman as the cause of unauthorized absence and if this fact is not appreciated by this Tribunal , it will be mis - carriage of justice.

Accordingly, punishment of dismissal is set aside. The period of absence should be considered as the medical leave ifdue. If no medical leave were due, the same shall be considered as the extra ordinary leave with or without payment of salary as per the rules prevailing in the company. For all purposes the workman shall be considered to be in service with all the service benefits . The heirs of the deceased workman shall also be entitled for all service benefits as they would have been entitled if the workman had died in services including the compassionate appointment as per the rules of the management. The management is directed to implement the award within one month from the date of publication ofaward. Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned.

Chandigarh.

G.K. SHARMA, PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 171,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का. 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दक्षिणं मध्य रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिकः अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 135/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-41025/2/2010- आई आर( बी-1 )] रमेश सिंह , डेक अधिकारी New Delhi , the 23rd December, 2010

S.O. 171, -In pursuance ofSection 17 ofthe Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 135/2005 ) of the CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour-Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Anhexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofSouth Central Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-12-2010

[No. L-41025/2/2010- IR(B-1 ) ) RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT- 1 AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , PresidingOfficer Dated the 4th day ofOctober, 2010

Industrial Distpute L.C. No. 135/2005

Between:

Sri KomavarapuVenkateswara Rao,

C/o Sri M. Pitchaiah,

12/3 , Arundelpet,

S/o Ramudu, Guntur.

Petitioner

AND 608

[PART I SEC . 3 ( ii )| THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

1. The Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer, T.R.D. Divisional Office, SouthCentral Railway, Vijayawada.

2. Officer on SpecialDuty, Divisional Office , Personal Branch , South Central Railway, Vijayawada.

3. ChiefElectrical Distribution Engineer (TRD), South Central Railway, RailNilayam, Secunderabad.

..... Respondents

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Petitioner Sri M. Pitchaiah , Advocate

Sri A. Prithviraj , Advocate

For the Respondent

which the applicant was dismissed had no application to the facts of the case . The punishment is shockingly disproportionate . Other workmen have also committed identical misconduct who were either let off or imposed with lesser punishment . The punishment is not in conscience with the circulars issued by the management . The action of the management in removing the applicant form the services is arbitrary, illegal , mala fide and incolourable exercise of his power, and unfair labour practice, discriminatory, unjustified and violative of principles of natural justice . The applicant is facing financial hardships as he has been thrown out of the employment as such , the orders of removal dated 28-6- 2002 be set aside and the management be directed to reinstate the applicant with continuity of service , back wages and all other , attendant benefits with 12% p.a. interest on arrears .

AWARD

This petition under sec. 2A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 was filed by Sri K. Venkateswara Rao, an ex , employee of the ChiefElectrical Distribution Engineer ofSouth Central Railway in lightofthe jurigment of the Hon'ble High Court ofAndhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3.8.1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others for quashing the order ofhis removal dated26.6.2002 and to reinstate him with full backwages..!

3. Counter statement field by the respondent wherein the Respondent management has stated that petitioner workman was posted as Khalasi . Thereafter he was promoted as Khalasi Helper, while working so , he was issued with a major penalty for committing grave fraud in obtaining appointment in Railway on compassionate grounds on the strength of false bio -data and bogus transfer certificate purported have been issued by S.K.P.V.V. Hindu High School for reckoning of age . The petitioner obtained employment by fraudulent means. A charge sheet along with 15 documents was issued to the petitioner , he submitted his explanation on 17-6-2002 duly accepting the charges unconditionally stating therein that he was misguided by his brother - in - law and some learned persons . Disciplinary action was initiated and full - fledged enquiry was conducted he was given full and fair opportunity to contest, the disciplinary proceeding though he admitted the mistake . The management witnesses were examined who proved that the petitioner had produced bogus transfer certificate and an incorrect date of birht to gain benefit . The charges of production of bogus certificates was found to be proved and he was dismissed from the service.

4. Parties were directed to file their evidence . Respondent management has filed proceeding book of the enquiry proceeding.

5. The petitioner workman challenged the very legality and validity of the domestic enquiry as such, my Learned Predecessor heard both the parties on the question oflegality ofthe domestic enquiry and by a reasoned order dated 8-3-2007, he concluded that the domestic enquiry conducted by the management is valid . Thereafter the matter was posted for, argument under sec . 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

6. Petitioner has not filed either written arguments or has made any oral submission under sec . 11A. Learned Counsel for the respondent has filed written.arguments as well as made oral submissions .

2. It has been alleged that the petitioner was appointed as Khalasi on 3.8.88 and worked upto 17.7.96 in that capacity. He was promoted to the post to Khalasi helper and worked upto 28.6.2002 in that capacity. The petitioner is workman within die meaning of Sec. 2 (S) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, The workman was issued witha proceeding bearing No. BMP . Con.227/11/2002/13 dated 28-6-2002 removing the applicant from service on the allegation that applicant produced false educational certificategivingwrong date ofbirth Le., 3-2-1955 alleged tohavebeen issued by S.K.F.V.V.H. High School . Though the management did not conduct any domestic enquiry in June, 2002 some vigilance effioors from Secunderabad office came to Vijayawada and unduly influenced the applicant and obtained his statement. One week thereafter , the applicant was called to Secunderabad office and he was made to give statement to the dictation of the vigilance officer, except this no other witness was examined in presence of the workman and no document was marked. No opportunitywas given to the workkanan beforeremoving him from service. It has further been alleged that copy of the documents were not supplied to the workman which was made basis of the disciplinary action. It has further been alleged that at the time of submission of educational certificateapplicant was not an employee ofSouth Central Railways, as such, the charge levelled against the applicant does not apply to the facts of the case. It can be said to the codified misconduct under the rules . The charge sheet on [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25, 1932

7. I have heard, and gone through the pleadings of the parties and documents produced by the respondent management .

10. Point No. (II) : Petitioner workman has not been able to prove that the action ofthe management is illegal or unjustifiable . Hence , he is no entitled to any relief. Point No. (H) is decided accordingly.

8. The following points have to be considered in thiscase:

11. From the above discussion, this court is ofthe opinion that this petition is devoid of any merit and it deserves to be dismissed and it is dismissed, Hence, this award.

(1) Whether the action of the management in terminating the services of the workman is legal andjustified ?

Awaredpassed accordingly. Transmit .

(II) To what relief the workman irentitled ?"

Dictatedto Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of October,2010.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidencé

Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 172.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार ईस्ट कोस्ट रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 22-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41011/13/2008-आई. आर ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 23rd December, 2010

S.O.172.-In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 14/2008) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of East Coast Railway and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2010

9. The workman has submitted through his claim satement that a proceeding was issued to him wherein it was mentioned that he has produced false educational certificate showing date ofbirth i.e. , 3-2-55 . His contention is that no enquiry was conducted nor he was given opportunity to participate in the proceeding . However, my learned predecessor vide his order dated 8-3-2007 has given a cogent finding that the domestic enquiry was conducted bythe management, charge sheet was given to the petitioner workman, management witnesses were examined and itwas foundby the Enquiry Officer that the petitioner submitted a bogus birth and education certificate . I have also gone through the documents produced by the management in which the statement of the petitioner workman has been recorded. The petitioner has stated that his educational qualification is SSC and his date ofbirth in the first instance he has stated it to be 1948 , whereas in his second statement he has stated that his actual date ofbirth is 10-6-1942 and has passed SSC. It was his brother- in -law who has arranged the certificate on the basis of which he has obtained the employment in the Railways on compassionate ground after death ofhis father. There is ample material on this enquiry proceeding that the enquiry was conducted in fair and proper manner and there is ample material to prove that as the S.P.V.V.H. High School no student of workman's name was ever admitted in that school neither he studied nor failed IX class nor his date of birth is 1955 as has been mentioned in it. This all goes to show that the workman of this case has produced bogus education and date ofbirth certificates togain employment, as he was born in the year 1942 he was quite over aged at the time ofhis compassionate appointment, so he has obtained the bogus certificate and produced it to gain appointment and he was offered the employment on compassionate grounds: There is nothing to contradict the finding of the Enquiry Officer or the conclusion arrived at during course of the enquiry that the Petitioner has produced the bogus birth certificate and study certificate. Thus , the verybasis of appointment of workman to gain the employment was the bogus certificate, as such , the management has not committed any mistake in terminating the services of the Petitioner who has obtained the employment on the basis ofbogus certificate and thus , the management has not committed any illegality. The Point No. (I) is decided accordingly.

[No.1-41011/13/2008- IR(B-4 ) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer 610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRE L TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer .

Dated the Istday ofNovember, 2010 مره IndustrialDisputeNo. 14/2008

Between:

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] 2. Petitioner union has filed claim statement and Respondents has also filed counter and documents . Respondents counsel has filed memo stating that party has agreed to get the dispute resolved through amicable settlement . The term of which is written in the memo. Workmen's counsel has also filed memo conceding that the claim be decided in terms of the memo filed by the Respondent . Both the parties has verified this memo.

ORDER

Petitioners

ThePresident, East Coast Railway Porters' Union, C/o Porter's Rest Union, Railway Sution, Bhubaneswar(Orissa)-751001

AND

TheSenior Divisional Commercial Manager, East Coast Railway, Walair Division, DRM OfficeComplex, Dondaparthy, Visakhapatnam

2 The Divisional RailwayManager, East Coast Railway, Walair Division, Dondaparthy, Visakhapatnam ... Respondents APPEARANCES:

For the Petitioner : M/s . T. Venkat Reddy, Ch . Janardhan Raddy, K.VN. Reddy and N. Venu- gopal , Advocates

For the Respondent : Sri A. Prithviraj , Advocate TheGovernment of India , Mintitry of Labour by its Onder No. L -41011 /13/2008- TR- 8 Died 30-6-2008 referred the following dispute under Section, 19 ( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of East Coast Railay and their workmen . The term ofreference is as under:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of East Coast Railway, Waltair Division represented by Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager and Divisional Railway Manager in denying the facility oftransfer of Licence Badges to the dependents of 166Railway Perters i.e. S/8ri Kerri Ganga Naidu and 165 others (as per list enclosed) engaged in various Railway Stations in Waltair Division is dentended by theEast Coast Railway Porter's Union is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workmen are entitled to ?" The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 14/2008 and notices were issued to the parties.

Thememo isrecorded as compromise/ settlement and the claim petition is decided in terms of the memo dated 1-11-2010 . It shall form part of the Award . Award is passed in terms of the memo. Upon the transfer of the badgesto the dependents of the 166 Railway Porters, the Petitioners shall be entitled for all consequential benefits arising therefrom. Hence, thisAward.

Awared passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. , Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 1st day of November,2010 .

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer AppendixofEvidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioners

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent Documents marked for the Petitioners NIL NIL

नईदिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 173. -औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दक्षिण भारतीय बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 49/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12014/02/2010- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010 S.O. 173.- In pursuance ofSection 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 49/2003 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the 611 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौय 25, 1932

management of South Indian Bank Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 22-12-2010

[No. L- 12014/02/2010-IR(B-1)] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT-1 AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

2. The Petitioner Sri A. Vijaya Kumar has filed this Petition against his termination dated 19-11-1996 , He submitted that he joined the service of the Respondent bank as clerk -cashier in the year 1985. Due to personal and physical problems he could not attend his duties and could not informthe Respondent. He was issued with chargeshoot dated 1-9-98 and after enquiry proceeding he was held to be guilty of the charges levelled against him, Petitioner further submits that he was given personal hearing and removed from service ofRespondent bank, from 19-11-1998. He submitted that he served a demand letter to the management for reconsideration oftermination order.Hence, Petitioner prayed to direct the Respondent managementió reinstate him with continuity of service, back wages and attendant benefits

Dated the 4th day of August, 2010

IndustrialDistpate No. L.C.L.D. 49/2003

(Old I.D. No. 50/2001 transferred from Labour Court, Guntur)

BETWEEN:

Sri A. Vijay Kumar,

S/oChinnabbai ,

C/o Sri C. Niranjan Rao ,

HIG- II , Block -22,

Flat-8, Baglingampally,

Petitioner

Hyderabad

AND

1. The General Manager, South IndianBank Ltd. ,

H.O. S.I.B. House,

PostBox No. 28 , Trissuru, Kerala

2. The Manager,

South Indian Bańk, Vijayawada.

Respondents

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Petitioner :

3. Respondent has filed counter statement . That Petitioner was working as a clerk -cum -cashier in the Vijayawada Branch of the bank. During course of his employment the workman cominitted certain gross and serious misconducts adversely affecting the proper and normalworkingof the bank and endangering the discipline of co - employees . It is subpritted that he has started committing misconducts from the year 1991 and also abstaining from duty without leave . First he was warned and later as he continued similar offences , this increment was stopped for a period of six months as panialment after a proper enquiry, That Petitioner Sri . A Vijayn Kuper continued to be absent without leave and disobeyed the orders to resume duty. An enquiry was condicted following the principles of natural justice . He was afforded اله opportunities during enquiry proceeding and also after for submission and for personal heating . Potitioner has requested to take a lenient view. But as the changes wore proved against him punishment of dismissal vide order dated 19-11-1998was given tothe Petitioner. The worlanan was unauthorizedly remain absent without intimation continuously from 29-10-1997 tift the date ofhis dismissal on 19-11-1998 which is a gross- misconduct under Clause 19.5 (f) oftheBipartite Settlement as such, the petition is liable to be dismissed.

M/ s . C. Niranjan Rao and M .. Subrahmanya Sastry, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/s . G. Vidya Sagar, K. Udaya Sri,P. Sudheer Rao and B. Shivakumar,

4. The Petitionor workman has filed rajoinder reiterating his prayer and stating that his petition is maintainable under Sec. 2A(2).

Advocates

AWARD

(

5.Case is fixed forhearing on 4-8-2010.On this date both parties called absent . Hence , this petition is dismissed in absence ofboth parties . Accordingly, a ' Nil Award' is passed in absence of parties concerned.

Accordingly, a 'Nil'Award is passed, Transmit.

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowrt, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of August, 2010.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer This case I.D. No. 50/2001 has been transferred from Labour Court, Guntur in view ofthe Government of India, Ministry of Labour's Order No. H- 11026/ 1 /2001 - IR (B - I) dated 18-10-01 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 49/2003 which is case taken under Sec . 2 A (2) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment ofthe Hon'ble High Court ofAndhraPradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated3-8-1995between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others.

612

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

THE GAZETTEOFNDA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

Appendix

esses examined for Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Respondent NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

spondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 174.- औद्योगिक विलार अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीयमें केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सत्रकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -22012/386/2007 -आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] ही. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 24th December,2010 S.O. 174. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Rat No. 15/2008 ) ofthe Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Anncture in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the manageinent of Ms. Singarem Colliaries Company Ltd. , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2010

No. L- 220 / 2 /336/2007- IR (CM - II)] D.S.S SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNISHURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- COM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , AT HYDERABAD

Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, PresidingOfficer Dated the3rd day ofNovember, 2010.

Industrial Distpate No. 15/2008 Between:

Sri Y. Sarangapani,

(Fitter and representative for 13 fitters of RG- IT) Qtr . No. St -2,2486

GDK-8, Incline Colony,

Petitioner Godavarikhani

AND

The ChiefGeneral Manager,

M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Ramagundam- II Division,

GDK-8 InclineColony (PO),

Godavarikhani - 505211

Respondents APPEARANCES:

For the Petitioner : Nil

For the Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and

Vijayalaxmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L-22012/336/2007 - IR(CM-II) dated 27-5-2008 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 )(d) ofthe I.D.Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , and their workmen . The reference is :

SCHEDULE

" Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , in denying promotion to Shri Y. Sarangapani and 13 others ( list enclosed) as per existing cadre scheme ( i.e., Policy No.49 dated 7-10-1993 circulated vide CLL/JCCI/1.1 . dated7-10-1993) is legal and justified ? To what relief are the workmen entitled ? "

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 15/2008 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. On 3-11-2010 case called out, Petitioner workman absent and Respondent's counsel is present. Petitioner Workman has not filed claim statément even after putting in appearance . Though several opportunities have been given to workmanbut he failed to submit claim statement as such, the case is dismissed in absence and non - filing of claim statement. Accordingly, ' Nil' Award is passed.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed.by her corrected by me on this the 3rd day of November, 2010.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendixofevidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL 613 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौच 25, 1932

APPEARANCES:

नईदिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2010

For the Petitioner :M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates.

For the Respondent : M/s P.A. V.VS. Sanm & Vijyalomi Panguluri , Advocates.

AWARD

का. आ. 175. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय औद्योमिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 141/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

This petition under Sec . 2A (2) of the I. D. Act, 1947 hasbeen filedby Sri Vemula Madhusudan , ex- badli to set aside the dismissal order dated 19-5-2003 and to reinstate the Petitionerworkman with full backwages .

[फा. सं. L- 22013 /1 /2010- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

2.It is alleged by the Petitioner that he was appointed NewDelhi , the 24th December, 2010

S.O. 175. In pursuance ofSection 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 141/2006) of the CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2010

[F. No. L-22013/ 1 /2010- IR(C- II)] D. S. S. SRINIVASARAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

ShriVedPrakash Gaur, PresidingOfficer.

Datedthe4thday ofOctober , 2010

Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 141/2006

BETWEEN:

as badli filler on 14-2-1989 and he was promoted as coal filler on 1-5-95andhe was regular to his duties upto 2000, During this period the Petitioner's son expired suddenly, due to which the Petitioner mentally depressed and foll sick and as such he could not be regular to his dutio charge sheet dated 7-3-2002 was issued alleging therein the Petitioner has worked for 72 days during 2001 which amount to misconduct under Company Standing Onders No. 25.25. The Petitioner has submitted his explanation but the Respondent were not satisfied and ordered for departmental enquiry. The Enquiry Officer conductedthe enquiry with predetermined notion. The onquiry was not valid in nature .The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on the basis of improper enquiry and the Disciplinary Authority did not consider the submission saade by the Petitioner and passed dismissal order of Patitioner w.e.f. 30-5-2003 vide order dated 19-5-2003. The Petitionerwas absent due to sudden death of his son and the same was stated by the Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer, по challenge was made from the side of the management as such, the submission made by the Petitioner wegid have been deemed to be correct but the Enquiry Officerhas not consideredthe submission made by the Petitioner workman. He submitted his enquiry report with a predetermined notion as such, the order passed on such enquiry report is bad and deserves to be quashed . Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner in the enquiry proceeding as such, the order dated 19-5-2003 be treated as bed in law and the punishment is too harsh and excessive to the charges alleged. He prayed this court to modify the punishment ofdismissal to that of any lesser penalty so as to survive himselfand to look after his family.

Petitioner

Sri Vemula Madhusudan, S/oBuchi Lingu, C/ o Smt .A. Sarojana,Advocate, FlatNo.G-7,Ground Floor, Rajeshwari, Gayatri Sadan, Opp. Badruka Jr. College forGirls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad,

And

1.TheGeneral Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , MandamarríArea, Post Kalyankhani , Adilabad District.

2.The Dy. General Manager, M/s . Singareni Collieries CompanyLtd. , KK- 5 Incline , Post Kalyankhani, Adilabad District.

Respondents

3.Management has filed counter statement alleging therein that Petitioner remained absent for the year2001 but for 72 days which hampered the working of the company, the absence of the Petitioner was without any sufficient cause which is grave misconduct within the Standing Orders 25.25 of the company and dismissal is not bad in the light of the case law reported in 1996( 1 ) SCC 302 State ofU.P. andOthersVs. Ashok Kumar Singh. Potkioner's contention that he was not afforded proper opportuniky is incorrect. Due notices were given to the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceeding . The notice was 3G/11-36 614

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

5. Before coming to the point of the legality of order passed by the management it is pertinent to mention that Learned Counsel for the Petitioner moved memo dated 1-5-2009 conceding the validity and legality of the domestic enquiry as such , the domestic enquiry was held to be legal and valid .

6. I have heard counsels for the parties and has gone through the claim petition , counter statement and documents filed by the parties .

7. It is admitted fact that the Petitioner has put in only 72 musters during the year 2001 for which a charge sheet dated 7-3-2002 was issued to the Petitioner against which the Petitioner filed his explanation stating therein that he remained absent due to ill-health and family problems . It is also admitted that domestic enquiry was conducted and Petitioner participated in the domestic enquiry. On the basis of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer dismissal order has been passed against the Petitioner which is under challenge .

8. In this case this tribunal has to consider:

(1) Whether the absence of Petitioner during the year 2001 was for any sufficient and reasonable cause or not and the report ofEnquiry Officer is based on evidence or riot ?

acknowledged by the Petitioner and he participated in the enquiry proceeding. Petitioner did not avail the assistance of co-worker though he was given the opportunity to take the help of a co- worker. Petitioner did not produce any sickness proofor death certificate ofhis son, thus he failed to produce any documentary evidence before the Enquiry Officer.Duringtheyears 1997, 1998 , 1999, 2000 and 2002 also the Petitioner was not regular to his duties. In the year 1997he put in only 83 musters, in 1998-94 musters, and in 1999-127musters, in the year 2000-140 musters and in the year 2002 he put in 119 musters . However, in the year 2001 he put in only 72 musters . This proves that the Petitioner was not sincere to his work. He intentionally absented himself without any reason or cause . The company has provided medical facilities by establishing hospitals, the Petitioner did not reported to the company hospital for his sickness or his son's sickness thus , if his submissions are true he would have supported that with documentary evidence, Enquiry Officer has given his finding onthematerial placed before him by the management and no fault can be find in the enquiry report, it is based on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal order is not disproportionatetothe misconduct committed by him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties company has dismissedhim which is neither illegal nor invalid. That in viewofa settlement dated 20-8-2004 which was arrived at with the recognized union i.e. , SCMLU a settlement was agreed as under:

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is disproportionate to the misconduct committed by the Petitioner ?

"in view of the persistent request of the recognized union, it was offered to examine the cases of those workmen, who were dismissed on account of absenteeism during the period from 1-1-2000 to 30-6-2004, by a High Power Committee headed by Director (PA & W) with the same criteria that was observed while.reviewing the case of ex -workmen dismissed on account of absenteeism during the period from 1-1-1997 to 31-12-1999, in terms ofMoS dated 21-2-2000. " In accordance with the above settlement, management invited applications from employees dismissed on the ground of absenteeism and the Petitioner too made his application and his casewas reviewedby the High Power Committee which did not consider his case Fit for appointment again in view of his poor attendance. Hence , the petition be dismissed as it is devoid of merits .

4. Parties were directed to produce documentary evidence in support of their claims. Petitioner has filed charge sheet dated 16-9-2002, enquiry proceeding, enquiry report, dismissal order dated 19-5-2003 and office order dated 8 / 11-2-1989. However, the Respondent has filed charge sheet with acknowledginent, Petitioner's explanation, notice of enquiry, entire domestic enquiry proceedings file , show cause notice issued to him , representation submitted by the Petitioner, his undertaking anddismissalorder.

Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has submitted that his son expired suddenly, due to which Petitioner got mentally depressed and fell sick during the year 2001 due to which he remained absent and put in 72 musters during the year 2001. His statement was recorded by the Enquiry Officer and during the course of the enquiry he stated that he worked for 72 days and remained absent for the rest of the days. Petitioner in his reply dated 12-4-2002 stated that his only sondied on 11-7-2001 due to ill-health due to which he suffered lot of trouble and mental agony causing him absence from duty. In his statement before Enquiry Officer also he stated that death ofhis only son affected his routine life and he remained absent . This material question has not been considered by the Enquiry Officer. No doubt , the Enquiry Officer has stated in his report that workman has cited his son's death as the cause ofhis absence, but, what was his finding about the workman's absence after death of his son has no where been mentioned in the report of the Enquiry Officer. No doubt, the management has produced Sri A. Udaya Mohan , POA as MWI and Sri K. Ranga Rao , Pay Sheet Clerk as MW2 who have stated that Petitioner remained absent without leave or without intimation and attended duty for 72 days only from January toDecember, but, what was the reason of absence has not been mentioned by either of the witnesses which has been statedby theworkman before the Enquiry Officer but same [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011/पौन 25, 1932

615 Dictatedto Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of October,2010.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Appendixofevidence

Witnesses examined

for the Petitioner

was not been challenged by the management as such, the contention of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner workman that Petitioner's mental condition was not ofthat state that he could join or perform to his duties after the sudden demise ofhis only son is fullyjustifiable . I am fully convincedthat ifa father loses his only son then his mental condition will be not of that state that he could perform any work for months together. Thus , in the present case, the absence ofPetitioner from July to December is fully explained andbased on reasonable and sufficient cause and finding of the Enquiry Officer was perverse and it is notbased on evidence available before the EnquiryOfficer. Point No. ( I) is decided accordingly.

9. Point No. (II) : This tribunal has to ascertain whetherthe punishment imposed isjustifiable or not . From thediscussion ofpoint No. (1) , this tribunal is of the opinion that workman's only son expired and he was no in such a mental state that he could perform his duties, the absence of Petitioner due to sudden demise of his only son is sufficient and good cause for absence of Petitioner from the duty. The Respondent has alleged that Petitioner remained absent during the year 1997, 1998 , 1999 and 2000 also but this material fact was not disclosed in the charge sheetnor Petitioner was charge sheeted for the absence in the previous year as such absence of previous years is of no consequence. The Petitionet's only absence has to be considered for the year 2001 during whichhe lost his only sonand in the opinion of this tribunal he was not in a state ofmind that he could have performed his duties regularly. The absence of Petitioner was justified and he remained absent for the reasonable cause , in that event the management has imposed an excessive and disproportionate punishment on the workman. Instead of punishing the Petitioner with the dismissal from the service his annual increment could have been stopped and tha couldhave been appropriate punishment in the case of the present Petitioner.

1 10. In the light of above discussion, this tribunal is ofthe opinion that the punishment of dismissal imposed on the Petitioner is excessive and deserves to be quashed. The proper punishment is stoppage of five annual increments ofthe Petitioner and he should be reinstated in the service, but without back wages as he has not worked during alltheseyears . Point No. ( II) is decided accordingly.

11. The Petition is allowed, dismissal order; 19-5-2003 is set aside and management is directed to reinstate the Petitioner within two months from the date ofpublication ofthe award. The Petitioner will not be entitled for back wagesbecause he did not inform the management regarding his absence and has not worked during all these years, he willbe entitled for wages from the date ofhis reinstatement. Hence, this award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Witnesses examined for the Respondeut

NIL NIL

Decumentsmarked for the Petitioner NIL Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 176.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एस. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2008 ) की प्रकाशि करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [फा. सं. एल-22013/1/2010- आईआर( सी-11 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010

S.O. 176.In pursuance ofSection 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government Herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 52/2008 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Governiment on 24-12-2010

[No.L-22013/1 /2010- R(C-1 ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 2nd day ofNovember, 2010 Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 52/2008 616

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

HETWEEN :

SriEppalaRamBabu, S/oAppaRao, C/oSmt. A. Sarojana,Advocate, FlatNo.G-7,Ground Floor, Rajeshwari , Gayatri Sadan, Opp . Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Basing on lopsided enquiry the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and submitted his report . Basing on the erroneous finding ofthe Enquiry Officer show cause notice was issued on 25-6-2004 to which the Petitioner submitted his reply. However, without considering the merit of submission, the workman was dismissed from service w.e.f. 9-10-2006 vide order dated30-9-2006.

Kachiguda,

Petitioner

Hyderabad

AND

1. TheGeneral Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Bhupalpally, Warangal District

2. The Dy. General Manager,

KTK- 1 Incline, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Bhupalpally, Warangal ,

District

Respondents

APPEARANCES:

ForthePetitioner : M/ s . A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

FortheRespondent : M/s. P.A. V.V. S. Sarma & Vijayalaxmi

Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

This petition under Sec . 2A( 2) ofI. D. Act, 1947 was filed by Sri E. Ram Babu, Ex . General Mazdoor ofM/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., against M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Challenging the order of his dismissal dated 30-9-2006 to quash the said order and reinstate him with back wages.

4. It has been submitted that in his reply to the charge sheet as well as during enquiry proceeding Petitioner categorically pleaded his inability to performthe duties for not more than 51 musters during 2003 , was only on account of the recurrent ill- health and other family problems . The Petitioner further pleaded before DisciplinaryAuthority that he will attend ofhis duty without absence in future but, above submission was also not considered. The order of dismissal is illegal, arbitrary, violative ofprinciples of natural justice because the enquiry was conducted in a routine and mechanical manner with a pre-determined notion to put the Petitioner to extreme hardship after dismissal . No opportunity was given to the Petitioner to avail assistance of a co- worker. The procedure ofenquiry was not explained to him nor he was asked to mark the documents during course of enquiry. Petitioner has shown the prescriptions of the hospital , reference letters and other record pertaining to his continuous ill- health but neither it was marked nor it was considered . No approval of the competent authority was obtained for passing the impugned order. The language in which the enquiry was conducted was not known to the workman . The finding is based on presumptions and without any basis. The Petitioners submissions remained unrebutted. Thus, it is treated to have been accepted by the Enquiry Officer. The Petitioner performed only 51 musters due to hisill -health and injuries sustained by him during course ofhis duties. The punishment imposed is excessive and disproportionate to the misconduct committed by the workman , hence he has prayed that the dismissal or termination order be quashed and he be reinstated into services of the Respondent .

2. It has been submitted by the workman that he was appointed as floating Badli Filler on 16-10-1986 and was transferred to Bhupalpally in the year 2002. In the year 2006he was converted as general Mazdoor . From the date ofappointment Petitioner was regular till the year2003. In . the year 2003 while he was performing his duties an iron pieceunfortunately pierced into his leg which caused injury which later on infected with septic . In addition to the above ailment he also suffered with Hepatitis, knee pains and spinal pains for which he took treatment in company's hospital and also in outside hospitals . He remained admitted into company'shospital for quite a long time .

5. Respondent management has filed counter challenging the maintainability of the petitioner under Sec . 2A(2), further stating that Petitioner was an unauthorized absentee who was dismissed from services on proved charges of absenteeism after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry following the principles of natural justice . As such, the legality and validity of domestic enquires be decided as preliminary issue .

3. He was chargesheeted and a charge sheet was issuedalleging that he could work only for 51 days during the year 2003, which amount to misconduct under company'sStanding Orders 25.25 and 25.31 through the chargesheet dated 15-3-2004; Enquiry was conducted with apredetermined notion as ifPetitioner absented from duties without any cause. During course of enquiry Petitioner was not given opportunity much less valid in nature .

6. It has been submitted that the workman was appointed on 16-10-1996 as Floating badli filler and later onas coal filler and he was drafted as general mazdoor in the year 2006 and he put in only 204 musters in the year 2001, 157 musters in 2002 and only 51 musters in the year 2003 whereas he has to put in a minimum of 190 musters every year. During course of domestic enquiry he was afforded proper opportunity by the Enquiry Officer. The 617 [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

during course ofenquiry that the same was not considered bythe Enquiry Officer. Thus, the finding of the Enquiry Officer is perverse for non - consideration of the submission made by the workman. He has further argued that workman was punished with severe punishment though dismissal from service is a last resort . Thus, the DisciplinaryAuthority has taken last resort of punishment by way of dismissing the Petitioner from the service, which is excessive and disproportionate, as such, the order ofdismissal is arbitrary, unjustified and illegal and deserves to be set aside.

Petitioner has participated in the enquiry proceeding, he admitted his guilt during his deposition on 10-6-2004. He informed the Enquiry Officer that he suffered with knee pain and back pain and he has taken treatment in private hospitals for better treatment which forced him to remain absent. He further assured that he will attend to his duties regularly. But he put in only 72 musters during 1-1-2004 to 10-6-2004. Enquiry report was sent to the Petitioner to submit his explanation . He did not submit any representation: The allegation of the Petitioner that he sustained injurywhile performing his duties is not correct. No prescription or medical certificate was produced by the enquiry proceeding during course of the enquiry. It is incorrect to say that he was not asked to make his documents , It was his duty which he did not perform. The Enquiry Officer has given his finding on the material available before him . It is incorrect to say that the Enquiry Officer was prejudiced or his enquiry is lopsided. The procedure of enquiry was made known to the Petitioner. He was informed about his right, to engage an assistant for his defence which he did not avail . He remained absent without any reasonable or sufficient cause hampering the working of the company, hence he was dismissed . The punishment is proper in the light ofthe facts of the present case. Hence, the Petitioner is not entitled for any smooth or lenient view.

11. Learned Counsel for the Respondent has contended that the question of absenteeism is undisputed , Itwas the duty ofthe Petitioner to prove that he remained absent for reasonable and sufficient, cause . He was chargesheeted and the Petitioner has to submit his explanation, but he did not submit any explanation to the charge sheet , this material fact has been accepted by the Petitioner workman during course of enquiry. However, the management has examined Sri B. Mahesh Babu, Acting POA, and Sri K. Damodara Chary, Pay Sheet Clerk and the Petitioner has examined himselfwherein he has stated that he was suffering with knee pain and back pain for which he took treatment in the private hospital . He has not stated thathe suffered with injury during course of his duties or he took treatment in company's hospital . Headmitted charges levelled against him and no document was produced by the Petitioner during course of the enquiry, as such, the contention of the Learned Counsel for the workman that workman was not afforded proper and ample opportunity is imaginary, it is not based on the material available before this tribunal, entire argument is baseless , imaginary and does not find support from the facts and the documents available on the record.

7. Both the parties were directed to file their respective evidence . Petitioner workman has filed the copy of charge sheet dated 15-3-2004, enquiry proceeding running in 8 pages and dismissal order. The Respondent management has also filed the original enquiry proceeding book running into 13 pages, charge sheet, notice of enquiry to the Petitioner , enquiry report , show cause notice and. dismissal order.

12.Hehas further argued that the Petitioner workman has put in only 51 musters during the year 2003 due to which the production has been hampered and the management has no other option but to dismiss such type of employees who are careless towards their duties. His punishment is neither disproportionate nor excessive.

8. Before entering into the merits of the case the question of legality and validity of the domestic enquiry was to be considered . On 27-1-2010 Learned Counsel for the workman filed memo conceding the legality and validity ofthe domestic enquiry, in the light of that memo domestic enquiry was held to be legal and valid.

9. I have heard both the counsels under Sec. 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

13. I have considered the above arguments of Learned Counsels for the parties and I have gone through the submission made by both the parties. The following points has to be considered by this tribunal :

(1) Whether the action ofPetitioner to remain absent from duty is for any sufficient and reasonable cause ?

(ii) Whether the punishment imposed on Petitioner is excessive and disproportionate ?

(ii) To what relief the Petitioner is entitled ?

10. Boththe Learned Counsels have filed their written submissions and I have gone through the written arguments ofthe parties and perusal of the file of the tribunal . It has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner workman that he has not disputed the fact that Petitioner was absent and put in only 51 musters during the year 2003. However, his contention is that the workman remained absent due to ill- health and he suffered injury during course of his duties for which he was treated in company's hospital and for better treatment he has gone outside company's hospital which has resulted for his absence from duties. This fact was stated by the workman

14. Point No (1): It is undisputed fact that Petitioner Sri E. RamBabu has put in only51 musters during the year 2003 and he remained absent without any prior sanction or leave . His contention is that he remained absent due to 618

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) | THEGAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

15. Point No. ( II) : It is established that Petitioner workman has put in only51 musters during the entire period of2003 without any reasonable and sufficient reason , he being a general mazdoor having remained absent even without any information to the department , as such , his conduct is improper and the management has committed no illegality in dismissing from service to such an employee who is careless towards his duties . The punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither excessive nor disporprotionate to the misconduct proved against the Petitioner . Point No. ( II ) is decided accordingly.

16. Point No. ( III) : It is submitted by the Petitioner that the family of the Petitioner is being forced to starvation because the Petitioner has been dismissed from the service . I have considered this argument and I am of the view that the reason of the starvation of the family members of the Petitioner is the careless and negligent behaviour and habit ofthe Petitioner. He is responsible for the starvation ofhis family members, as such , any lenient attitude can not be taken in this matter. The Petitioner does not deserve any sympathy or relief from this tribunal . Point No. ( III ) is decided accordingly.

17. In view of the above discussion , this tribunal is of the opinion that Petition deserves to be dismissed and it is dismissed . Hence , this Award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 2nd day of November,2010.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

NIL Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL Documerits marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 177.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947′ ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 43/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । knee pain and back pain and that he sustained injury during course of hisduty and a piece of iron pierced in his leg which developed septic and several complications . This material fact stated in the claim petition was neither stated before the Enquiry Officer nor in the evidence produced in support of his contention . The Petitioner workman has alleged that he was not informed during course of departmental enquiry that he has to mark his documents. Ifhe would have been informed about this aspect the Petitioner would have marked his documents , but to utter surprise of this tribunal the Petitioner has not produced any documents during course of enquiry or hearing of this case before this tribunal . Had the Petitioner been in possession ofhis medical certificates and prescriptions and he was not afforded opportunity to produce before EnquiryOfficer, it was his bounden duty to produce those documents before this tribunal to prove that he was in possession of medical certificates which he could not produce due to ignorance or because the Enquiry Officer did not ask him to produce those documents . Non- productionofthe medical certificate during this proceeding goes to show that the Petitioner workman got no medical certificate nor he ever produced any certificate before the Enquiry Officer. His submission before this tribunal is merely imaginary and baseless . The Petitioner has contendedthat he was suffering from knee pain and spinal painbut no certificate has been produced by him . Thus , mere submission of the Petitioner that he was suffering fromkneepain and spinal pain is not sufficient to hold that his absence was for valid and reasonable cause . I have gone through the enquiry proceeding file . Petitioner has stated before the Enquiry Officer that he was suffering fromknee and spinal pain but he has categorically admitted that he remained absent without any reasonable cause and he pleaded guilty of the charges levelled against him. Thissubmission ofthe Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer supported with the evidence ofthe management witnesses , the Enquiry Officer was fully justified in arriving at the conclusion that Petitioner was absent without any reasonable or sufficient cause and the charges of misconductunder company's Standing Order Nos . 25.25 and25.31 is proved is based on cogent reason and material available before the Enquiry Officer. I am fully in the agreement with the finding of the Enquiry Officer and the argument of the Leamed Counsel for the Respondent that the Petitioner workman was afforded fair and ample opportunity during enquiry proceeding and the Petitioner workman has participated in the proceeding, witnesses were examined in his presence he himself has examined in his defence but he was not able to prove the reasonableness of his absence. Thus , this tribunel has come to the conclusion that the Petitioner workman worked for 51 days during the year 2003 and he remained absent without any reasonable and sufficient cause and thereby he has committed misconduct within the meaning ofStandingOrder Nos. 25 25 and 25.31 . Point No. (1 ) is decided accordingly.

[फा. सं. एल-22013/1/2010- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी 619. [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनधरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

New Delhi, the 24th December , 2010

to set aside the termination order dated 26-6-2003 andto reinstate the Petitioner workman with full back wages .

S.O. 177.-In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 43/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 24-12-2010.

[No. L-22013/1 /2010- IR(C- II)] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Office

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

Dated the 5th day of October, 2010

Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 43/2007

BETWEEN :

SriBanothNageswarRao,

S/o Sakru, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,Advocate, Flat No. G-7,Ground Floor, Rajeshwari , Gayatri Sadan, Opp. Badruka Jr. College forGirls, Kachigula,

Petitioner

Hyderabad

AND

2. It is alleged by the Petitioner that he was appointed as badli filler on 17-3-1997 and he was regular to his duties till 2001. During the year 2002 the Petitioner met with a road accident and he fell sick for some time and further his sister expired suddenly after 2 months of her marriage.All these impediments refrained the Petitioner not to be reguler tohis duties during the year 2002. A chargesheet dated 11-1-2003 was issued alleged that the Petitioner has worked for99days during2002which amount to misconduct under company's Standing Orders No. 25.25 . The Petitioner has submitted his explanation but the Respondent were not satisfied and ordered for departmental enquiry. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry with pro- determined negion. The enquiry was not valid in nature. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on the basis of a show cause notice to the Petitioner against which Petitioner submitted his reply on 26-2-2003. The Disciplinary Authority did not consider the submission made by the Petitioner andand passed dismissal order of Petitioner vide order dated 26-6-2003. The Petitioner was absent due to ill- health and the same wasstatedby the Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer, πο challenge was made from the side of the management as such, the submission made by the Petitioner would have beendeemed to be correct but the Enquiry Officer tas not considered the submission made by the Petitioner wodman . He submitted his enquiry report with a pre-determined notion as such, the order passed on such enquiry report is bad and deserves to be quashed. Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner in the enquiry proceeding. Dismissal order based on that enquiry is illegal, aturary and is liable to be treated as bad in law. Hence , he prayed that the impugned order be quashed and the Respondent be directedto reinstate the Potitioner with back wages and all consequential benefits.

1. TheGeneral Manager, M/sSingareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Kothagudem Area, Kothagudem , Khammam District

2. The Superintendent of Mines, M/sSingareni Collieries CompanyLtd. , 5BIncline, KothagudemArea, Kothagudem, Khammam

District

Respondents

APPEARANCES:

For the Petitioner : M/ s A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates.

For theRespondent : M/s P.A.V.V. S. Sarma & Vijayalaxmi Panguluri,Advocates.

AWARD

This petitionunder Sec . 2A(2) of the I. D. Act, 1947 hasbeen filed by Sri Banoth Nageswar Rao , ex-badlifiller

3. Management has submitted his reply alleging therein that Petitioner remained abuent throughout your 2002but for99 days which humpered the working of the company, the absence of the Petitioner was without any sufficient cause which is grave misconduct within the Standing Orders 25.25 ofthe company and dismissal is not bad inthe light ofthe case law reported in 1996(1 ) SCC 302 State of U.P. and others Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh . Petitioner's contention that he was not afforded proper opportunity is incorrect. Due notices were given to the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceeding. The notice was acknowledged by the Petitioner and he participated in the enquiry proceeding . Potitioner did not availed the assistance of co- worker though he was given the opportunity to take the help ofa co -worker. Petitioner did not produce any sickness proof, thus he failed to produce any documentary evidence before the Enquiry Officer. During the years 1998 to 2003 also the Petitioner was not regular to his duties. Particulars wie as follows :

620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

Year

No. of musters put in

167

1998

189

1999

2000

121.

2001

163

2002

099

166

2003

Thisprove that the Petitioner was not sincere to his work. He intentionally absented himselfwithout any reason or cause.The company has provided medical facilities by establishing hospitals , the Petitioner did not report to the company hospital for his sickness thus, his submission thathe was absent due to ill -health is unfounded, Enquiry Officer has given his finding on the material placed before him by the management and no fault can be find in the enquiry report, it is based on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal order is not disproportionate to the misconduct committedby him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties companyhas dismissed him which is neither illegal nor invalid.

Parties were directed to produce documentary evidence in support of their claims . Petitioner has filed xerox copies of chargesheet dated 11-1-2003 , enquiry proceeding, enquiry report and dismissal order dated 26-6-2003. However, the Respondent has charge sheet , acknowledgement of charge sheet, explanation submitted by the Petitioner, notice of enquiry, filed entire domestic enquiry proceedings , show cause notice issued tohim his explanation against show cause notice, reply to Petitioneranddismissal order.

९ 4. Before coming to the point of the legality ofthe order passed by the management it is pertinent to mention that Learned Counsel for the Petitioner moved memo dated 11-11-2008 conceding the validity and legality of the domestic enquiry as such , the domestic enquiry was held tobe legal and valid.

4. I have heard counselu for the parties and has gone through the claim petition , counter statement and documents filed by the parties.

7. It is admitted fact that the Petitioner has put in only99mustersduring the year 2002 for which a charge- sheet dated 11-1-2003 was issued to the Petitioner against which the Petitioner filed his explanation stating therein that he remained absent because of road accident he met with and sudden demise of his sister. It is also admitted that domestic enquiry was conducted and Petitioner participated in the domestic enquiry. On the basis of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer dismissal order has been passed against the Petitioner which is under challenge. In this case this tribunal has to consider :

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] (1 ) Whether the absence of Petitioner during the year 2002 was for any sufficient and reasonable cause or not and the report of Enquiry Officer is based on evidence or not

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is disproportionate to the misconduct committed by the Petitioner.

8. Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has submitted that he metwith road accident during the year 2002 due to which he remained absent and put in 99 musters during the year 2002. His statement was recorded by the Enquiry Officer duringthe course of the enquiry, he stated that he worked for 99 days and remained absent for 193 days due to health problem and personal problems, but has not been able to provide any single document before the Enquiry Officerto substantiate his allegations . In his reply dated 26-2-2003 hesimplywritten that he was not keeping good health and also due to family problems he could not attend to his duties regularly. As against this , the management has produced Sri R. Vijaya Kumar, O.S. to prove that Petitioner remained absent without any leave or without any intimation for 193 days during the year 2002 from January to December. Since absence of the Petitioner was admitted bythe Petitioner himself it was the sole duty ofthe Petitioner to prove that his absence was due to any cogent reason or sufficient cause. Petitioner was not able to prove that his absence during the year 2002 was due to sufficient reason. Though he stated that he was absent due to ill -health but he has not been able to provide any evidence or proof in support of his illness or treatment for his injuries caused by road accident. Even if it is presumed that Petitioner remained absent due to the ill - health or sudden death of hissister why he did not informed his superiors regarding the same has not been explained by the Petitioner. Thus , the finding of the Enquiry Officer that Petitioner's absence for 193 days during the year 2002 was based on evidence and reasoning and no fault can be find in the finding arrived at by the Enquiry Officer.

9. This tribunal is also of the opinion that the Petitioner remained absent without any intimation to his employer during the year 2002 for 193 days , his absence was without any reasonable or sufficient cause and thereby the Petitioner has committed misconduct mentioned in para 25.25 of the Standing Orders of the corfipany. Point No. I is decided accordingly.

10. Point No. 2 : So far as the question of punishment is concerned the Petitioner has not been able to justify his absence during the year 2002 he has voluntarily admitted before the Enquiry Officer that he remained absent during 2002 and could attend only 99 musters though the Respondent management has stated in the counter statement that Petitioner remained absent during the year 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and in 2003 also which was not mentioned in the charge sheet . However, this fact was not [भाग II सखंड3(ii)]

621

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011/ पौष 25, 1932

brought before the Enquiry Officer also . As such, the previous absence cannot be taken into consideration but the absence in the year 2002 for 193 days is surely a grave misconduct and management has not committed any mistake in passing the punishment ofdismissal against the Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that the Petitioner's family is starving due to dismissal ofthe Petitioner against which Learned Counsel for the Respondent has argued that Pétitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of the family members , the Petitioner was a unwilling worker who has not cared to perform his duties with sincerity as such, the punishment was proper and interference is not required in this case.

11. I agree with the argument of the Learned Counsel for the Respondent and I am also of the considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither excessive nor disproportionate and Petitioner is not a deserving person for any lenient view to be taken in favour ofthe Petitioner. The Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation ofhis family members, no interference is required in the matter of the punishment. Point No. 2 is decided accordingly.

12. From the above discussion, this tribunal is of the considered opinion that the claim petition is unfounded, no interference is required in this case . Petitioner is alot entitled for any relief, petition deserves to be dismissed andhence, this award.

pinco Award passed accordingly. Transmit

Dictatedto Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 5th day of October,2010,

nochib srow esinst NewDelhi, the 24thDecember, 2010 S.O.178. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the ludustrial DisputeAct, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Governatent thereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 126/2006) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribund- cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2

[No.1-22013/4 /2010-100-11)] D.S.S.S. S. SRINIVASARA Daido@ffice

Coimastaxe eid BEFORE THETHE CENTRAL GOлоз INDUSTRIAL, TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURTAT PRESENT TOROHIal shoi bouzzi zew son venilgiosia sit viası zid batainduz tononite

November, 2010 * za se noizzindua ali doua es troisgenim orth to Sri Uppupisti Ram Mouliet aved bluew า รกองเร Posha beebietios ton asd

burlasugayati Sad , Cop Badadas, ouk

ton

bad

vodni bedios ba

VEDPRAKASHGAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix ofevidence

Witnesses examinedress is Witnestesoxamined for the for the Petitionstone arenaspondentiupts to safion NIL

wibils Documents marked for the Petitioner meblevenemarkedDocuments for the Respondentiavori anadmob sdt daug an vuo pitesnob sdt to virisiyol नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसंबर 2018

का. आ. 178 औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947- केन्द्रीय सरकार एल. सी. सी का'14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय

एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवादविवाद मेंमें केन्द्रीयकेन्द्रीय सरकारसरख औद्योगिक ( 126/2006 ) को प्रकाशित को 24 + 16 +2000 अने प्राप्त हुन आहे अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार

22013 / 1 / 2010 - आई आर( सी- 3Gl /11-37

1. The General Manager ,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri , Adilabad District

2. The Colliery Managers st morsur Superintendent ofMines

M/s.Singareni Collieries CompanyLtd, 10 Kasipeta Mine, Mandamarri,

AdilabadDistrict

Respondents

igotwal APPEARANCES :

M/ s A. Sarojana & KeVandeve For the Petitioner :

Reddy, Advocator

Ms PAVVS. Sorties For the Respondent :

Pangulori , Advocaten bi

-037

AWARD

This petition under Sec. 24(2 ) of 15 1 been filed by SriUppupleti Raja Moguli; Draadionila aside the termination order dated 20-5-1999. the Petitioner workman with full back wal 22

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15,2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

Power Committee , which was to examine the cases of workmenwho were absent during the period from 1-1-1997 to 31-12-1999, Petitioner's case was considered by the High Power Committee but in view ofhis poor performance since 1994 the Petitioner was not found fit for re- appointment . The year- wise attendance is follows:

Year

Attendance

1994

067

070

1995

1996

059

1997

050

018.

1998

1999

007 (Upto31-7-1999)

This prove that the Petitioner was not sincere to his work, He intentionally absented himself without any reason or cause. The company has provided medical facilities by establishing hospitals, the Petitioner did not reported to the companyhospital for his sickness thus , his submission that he was absent due to ill - health is unfounded, Enquiry Officer has givenhis finding on the material placed before ⚫him by the management and no fault can be find in the enquiry report, it is based on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal órder is not disproportionate to the misconduct committedby him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties company has dismissed him which is neither illegal nor invalid .

2. It is alleged by the Petitioner that he was appointed as BCF on 24-10-1989 under compassionate grounds , as the father of the Petitioner was declared as unfit on 8-4-1989 due to defective vision . He was regular to his duties till 1998. During the year 1998 the Petitioner suffered from LeftUreteric Calculus lower ends recurrently. He went to company's hospital for treatment who in turn referred him to the Osmania General Hospital , Hyderabad, accordingly he was under treatment on various dates recurrently. A charge sheet dated 30-1-1999 was issued . alleging that the Petitioner has absented from duty during 1998 which amount to misconduct under company's Standing Orders No. 25.25 . The Petitioner has submitted his explanation but the Respondents were not satisfied andordered for departmental enquiry. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry with pre- determined notion . The enquiry was not valid in fature. The Enquiry Officer submittedhis report . On the basis ofenquiry report a show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner against which Petitioner submitted his reply, the DisciplinaryAuthority passed dismissal order dated 20-8-1999 dismissing him w.e.f. 25-8-1999 without considering the submission made by the Petitioner. The Petitioner was absent due to ill- health and the same was stated by the Petitioner before theEnquiry Officer, no challenge was made from the side of the management as such , the submission made by the Petitioner would have been deemed to be correct but the *EnquiryOfficer has not considered the submission made bythePetitioner workman. He submitted his enquiry report with a predetermined notion as such , the order passed on such enquiry report is bad and deserves to be quashed. Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner in the equiry proceeding. Dismissal order based on that enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and is liable to be treated as bad in law. Hence, it is prayed that the impugned order be quashed and the Respondent be directed to reinstate the Petitioner withback wages and all consequential benefits.

4. Parties were directed to produce documentary evidence in support of their claims . Petitioner has filed xerox copy of dismissal order . However , the Respondent has filed charge sheet, paper publication of charge sheet, outstation medical certificate, representation, notice of enquiry, entire domestic enquiry proceedings , acknowledgement and dismissal order.:

5. Coming to the point of the legality and validity of domestic enquiry conducted by the management it is pertinent to mention that Learned Counsel for the Petitioner moved memo dated 30-1-2009 conceding the validity and legality of the domestic enquiry as such , the domestic enquiry was held to be legal and valid.

6. I have heard counsels for the parties and has gone through the claim petition, counter statement and documents filed by the parties.

7. It is admitted fact that the Petitioner has put in only 18 musters during the year 1998 for which a charge sheet dated 30-1-1999 was issued to the Petitioner against which the Petitioner filed his explanation stating therein that he remained absent because of ill -health . It is also admitted that domestic enquiry was conducted and Petitioner participated in the domestic enquiry. On the basis 3. Management has submitted his reply alleging thereinthat Petitioner remained absent for the year 1998 which hampered the working ofthe company, the absence of the Petitioner was without any sufficient cause which is grave misconduct within tite Standing Orders 25.25 ofthe company and dismissal is not bad in the light of the case law reported in 1996( 1 ) SCC 302 State of U.P. and others Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh . Petitioner's contention that he was not afforded proper opportunity is incorrect. Due notices were given to the Petitioner to participate in the enquity proceeding . The notice was acknowledged by the Petitioner and he participated in the enquiry proceeding . Petitioner did not availed the assistance ofco-worker though he was given the opportunity to take the help of a co- worker. Petitioner did not produce any sickness proof, thushe failedto produce any documentary evidence before the Enquiry Officer . As per Memorandum of Settlement dated 21-2-2000 a decision was taken to review the cases ofworkmendismissed on account ofabsenteeismby High [ भाग 11-खखंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer dismissal order has been passed against the Petitioner which is under challenge . In this case this tribunal has to consider:

( 1 ) Whether the absence of Petitionerduringthe year 1998was forany sufficient and reasonable cause or not and the report of EnquiryOfficer isbased on evidence or not.

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is disproportionate to the misconduct committed by the Petitioner.

8. Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has submitted that he .

10. Point No. 2 : So far as the question ofpunishment is concerned the Petitioner has not bein able to justify his absence during the year 1997. he has voluntarily admitted. before the Enquiry Officer that he remained absent during 1998 and could attend only 18 musters though the Respondent management has stated in the counter statement that Petitioner remained absent during the years 1994 to 1998 and also after charge sheet which was not mentioned in the charge sheet . Moreover, this fact was not brought before the Enquiry Officer also. As such, the previous absence can not be taken into consideration but theabsence in the year 1998 is surely a grave misconduct and management has not committed any mistake in passing the punishment of dismissal against the Petitioner, The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that the Petitioner's family is starving due to dismissal of the Petitioner against, which Learned Counsel for the Respondent has argued that Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of the family members , the Petitioner was a unwilling worker who has not cared to perform his duties with sincerity as such, the punishmem was proper and interference is not required in this case.

A 11. I agree with the argument of the Learned Counsel for theRespondent and I am also of the considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither *excessive nor disproportionate and Petitioner is not a deserving person for any lenient, view to be taken in favour ofthe Petitioner. The Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of his family members , no interference is required in the matter of the punishment . Point No. 2 is decided accordingly,

12. From the above discussion , this tribunal is ofthe considered opinion that the claim petition is unfounded , no interference is required in this case. Petitioner is not entitled for any relief, petition deserves to be dismissed and it is dismissed, Hence, this award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of November,2010 .

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Prosikling Officer

AppendixofEvidence

was sick and suffering from depressive psycho and he was taking treatment at colliery hospitals and private hospitals due towhich he remained absent during the year 1998 and putin 18musters during the year 1998. His statementwas recorded by the Enquiry Officer and during the course of. the enquiry, he stated that he worked for 18 days and remained absent for the rest ofdays in 1998 due to health problems , and submitted one medical certificate from Dr. R.R. Faria, Physician & Surgeon at M.G.M. Hospital, Warangal and not a single document/medical certificate from company's dispensary or hospital before the Enquiry Officer to substantiate his allegations. In his reply dated 15-5-1999 simply he wrote that he was not keeping good health due to which he could not attend to his duties regularly from 1-1-1998 to 23-4-1999. As against this, the- management has produced Sri A. Dayanand, Pay Sheet Clerk and Sri S. Nageswara Rao , Acting Clerk to prove that Petitioner remained absent without any leave or without any intimation during the year 1998 from January to December. Since absence of the Petitioner was admitted bythe Petitioner himselfit was the sole duty ofthe Petitioner to prove that his absence was due to any cogent reason or sufficient cause. Petitioner was not able to prove thathis absence during the year 1998 was due to sufficient reason. Though he stated that he was absent due to ill-health but he is not able to provide any evidence or proof in support of his illness or treatment for ill-health . The medical certificate produced by workman during enquiry proceeding was not proved by summoning the concerned Doctor nor workman has informed his superiors regarding his absence, the reasons had not been explained by the Petitioner. Thus, the finding of the Enquiry Officer that Petitioner's absence during the year 1998 was without sufficient and reasonable cause, is based on evidence and nofault canbe find in the finding arrived at by the Enquiry Officer.

Witnesses examined forthePetitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner NH

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

9. This tribunal is also of the opinion that the Petitioner remained absent without any intimation to his employer during the year 1998 his absence was without any reasonable or sufficient cause and thereby the Petitioner has cornmitted misconduct mentioned in para 25.25 of the Standing Orders ofthe Company, Point No. 1 is decidedaccordingly.

624

नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 179. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का(4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विकार में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 122/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22013/1/2010- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th December ,2010 S.O. 179. In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 122/2007) of the CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal - curn -Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was receivededbyby the Central Government on 24-12-2010

[No. L-22013 /1 /2010- IR(C- II)] D.S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 5th day ofOctober, 2010 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO. 122/2007 BETWEEN:

SriD.A. Michale, S/o D. Thomas

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate , FlatNo. G7,Ground Floor, Rajeshwari , Gayatri Sadan , Opp . Badruka Jr. College ForGirls , Kachiguda,

Petitioner.

Hyderabad

AND

1. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collleries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri ,

2. The Sr. Divisional Engineer ,

M/s. Singareni Collleries Company Ltd. , Area Workshop, Mandamarri Area, Mandamárri,

AdilabadDistrict !

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Petitioner :M/s . A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya- laxmi Panguluri ,Advocates .

AWARD

This petition under Sec . 2A (2) of I. D. Act , 1947 has -been filed by Sri D.A. Michale, ex- badli to set aside the termination order dated 8-12-2000 and to reinstate the Petitioner workman with full backwages .

2. It is alleged by the Petitioner that he was appointed as driver on 12-8-1982 and promoted as Loader Operator in 1985, he was regular to his duties from the date of his appointment . A proceeding No. P/RKP/ 16/97 / 2516 dated 27-9-1997 was issued by Respondent No. 1 alleging that chargesheet dated 24-8-1996 was issued under Company Standing Orders No. 25.25 and 25.31 for habitual absenteeism during the year 1996 and thereafter an exparte enquiry was conducted and the Petitioner was dismissed from service . It is submitted that Petitioner's son expired during the year 1996 , due to that abyss, Petitioner's mental status was lost and he has undergone treatment in his native village . During his ill- mental status, he was not informed about the issuance of the chargesheet and other proceedings. The Petitioner's wife has submitted several representations explaining the mental disorderliness of her husband before issuance of the impugned order dated 27-9-1997 . The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry with pre-determined notion . The enquiry was not valid in nature. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report and the Disciplinary Authority did not consider the submission made by the Petitioner's wife and passed dismissal order on Petitioner vide order dated 27-9-1997 . The Petitioner was absent due to ill - health and the same was represented by the wife ofPetitioner before Respondents . The Enquiry Officer conducted exparte enquiry as such , the order passed on such enquiry report is bad and deserves to be quashed . Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner. He prayed to declare the impugned order of the Respondent No. 1 dated 27-9-1997 as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service with continuity, of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits .

Respondents

3. Management has submitted his reply alleging therein that Petitioner remained absent during the year 1996 which hampered the working of the company, the absence of the Petitioner was without any sufficient cause which is grave misconduct within the Standing Orders 25.25 of the Company and dismissal is not bad in the light of the case law reported in 1996 ( 1 ) SCC 302 State of U.P. and Others Vs.Ashok Kumar Singh . It is submitted that the Petitioner भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

[भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

5. Coming to the poet of loyality and validity of domestic enquiry conducted by the mingislet ปี วิ่ง pertinent to mention that Lomned Cons of for the Pottieucs moved meme dated 27-1-2010 concoding the valthy and legality of the domestic enquity as such, the domestic enquirywas held to be legal and valid

6. I have heard counsels for the parties and has gone through the claim petition , counter statement and documents filed by the parties.

7. It is admitted fact that the Petitioner was absont fromduties from 29-3-1996 onwards for which a chargesheet dated 24-8-1996 was issued to the Petitionor which was returned undelivered. After that paper notification was issued regarding issuance of chargesheet and subsequent enquiry to be conducted. It is also admited that on parte enquiry was conducted. On the basis of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer dinmisani ordures bega passed against the Petitioner which is under chollonge la this case this tribunal has to consid

(1 ) Whether the alabsence of Petitionerof Petitioner, doring the year 1996 was for any sufficient and reasonable cause or not and the report of Enquiry Officer is, based on evidence or not ?

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner isdisproportionate to the inisconduct committed by the Petitioner 2

was initially appointed in the Respondent's Company on 12-7-1982 and was promoted as Terex Operator (Loader Operator). It is submitted that Petitioner was absent from 29-3-1996 without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause which constituted misconduct under Company's Standing Orders No. 25.25, thereby he was issued with chargesheet which was sent to his residential address under registered post acknowledgement due but, the same was returned undelivered by Postal Authorities . Then, the chargesheet cum-enquiry notice was published in Telugu Daily Andhra Jyothi dated 20-10-1996 advising the Petitioner to attend the enquiry on 24-10-1996 but he did not attend the enquiry on that date, hence , an ex parte enquiry was conducted into the charges levelled against the Petitioner and held the Petitioner guilty of the charges. After the conduct of the enquiry, enquiry report was sent to the Petitioner, as it could not be served on the Petitioner a notice was published in Telugu daily Andhra Jyothi dated 23-6-1997 advising the Petitioner to collect a copy of the enquiry report from the office of the General Manager, Ramakrishnapur to submit his representation , if any. However, his wife Mrs. Michael , submitted a representation dated 21-6-1997 stating therein that her husband Mr. D. A. Michale was suffering from mental illness and was under treatment, as per the advise of Doctors he needs time for recovery and hence, requested some time to enable him to report for duty. It is submitted that this representation was not considered because the Petitioner has not applied for any leave or he did not report sick in Colliery Hospital . The Resporident Company has been operating dispensaries , area hospitals and main hospital to extend medical aid to its employees and their families . Petitioner or his wife has not submitted any documentary evidence in support of the alleged mental illness of the Petitioner. The company has provided medical facilities by establishing hospitals , thePetitioner did not reported to the companyhospital for his sickness thus , the submission that he was absent due to ill -health is unfounded. Enquiry Officer has given his finding on the material placed before him by the management and no fault can be find in the enquiry report, it is based on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal order is not disproportionate to the misconduct committed by him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties company has dismissed him which is neither illegal nor invalid.

4. Parties were directed to produce documentary evidence in support of their claims . Petitioner has filed xerox copies representation dated 21-6-97 and dismissal order dated 27-9-1997 . However , the Respondent has filed chargesheet, undelivered chargesheet with postal cover, paper notification of notice of enquiry alongwith chargesheet , enquiry proceedings enquiry report , representation of Mrs. Michale, wife of chargesheeted employee, paper,publication intimating the Petitioner to receive copy of enquiry proceedings and enquiry report and dismissal order.

8. Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has subraitted that he remained ill during the year 1996 sulfioned with mental illness due tohis son's death and he remained absent during the year1996. He did not attend enquiry proceeding. Ex parte enquiry has been conducted, charges against him held proved and he was dismissed. Neither the Petitioner nor his wife was able to produce any documentary evidence showing his tmental illness, or proof of his treatment in company's hospital or other hospitals, due to which he remained absent . Workman has not provided any single document before. Respondent to substantiate his allegations . In the representation submitted by wife of Petitioner it is simply written that workman was mentally ill and some more time be given to him to jom his duties as he is still under treatment . No supporting documents/ prescriptions/reports were onclosed. As against this, the managementhas produced Sri A. Urday Mohan, Clerk and SriP. PrasadaRao, Clerk at CSP, RKP to prove that Petitioner remained absent without any leave or without any intimation during the year 1996 from March toDecember. Since absence of the Petitioner was proved in enquiry it was the sole duty ofthe Petitioner to prove that his absence was due to any cogent reason or sufficient cause. Petitioner was not able to prove that his absence during the year 1996 was due to sufficient reason Thongh he stated that he was absent due to ill-health but he has not provided 626

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) )

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

any evidence or proof in support of his illness. Thus, the finding of the Enquiry Officer that Petitioner's absence during the year 1996 was based on evidence and reasoning and no fault can be find in the finding arrived at by the EnquiryOfficer.

9. This tribunal is also of the opinion that the Petitioner remained absent without any intimation to his employer during theyear 1996, his absence was without any reasonable or sufficient cause, and thereby the Petitioner has committed misconduct mentioned in para 25.25 and 25.31 of the Standing Orders of the company. Point No. 1 is decided accordingly.

10 Point No. 2 : So far as the question of punishment is concerned the Petitioner has not been able tojustifyhis absence during the year 1996. The absence in the year 1996 is surely a grave misconduct and management has not committed any mistake in passing the punishment of dismissal against the Petitioner . The Learned Counsel for. the Petitioner has argued that the Petitioner's family is starving due to dismissal of the Petitioner against which Learned Counsel for the Respondent has argued that Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of the family members, as such, the punishment was proper and interference is not required in this case. :

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 180.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -22013/ 1/2010- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एसः श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th December , 2010

S.O. 180.-In pursuance ofSection 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 24-12-2010

[No. L-22013/ 1 /2010- IR(C- II )] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENTA

11.1 agree with the argument ofthe Learned Counsel for theRespondent and I am also ofthe considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither excessive nor disproportionate and Petitioner is not a deserving person for any lenient viewto be taken in favour ofthePetitioner. The Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation ofhis family members, no interference is required in the matter of the punishment, Point No. 2 is decided accordingly.

12. From the above discussion, this tribunal is ofthe considered opinion that the claim petition is unfounded, no interference is required in this ame. Petitioner is not entitled for any relief, petition deserves to be dismissed, it is dismissed and hence, this award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 5th day of October,2010.

VED PRAKASHGAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for thePetitioner

Witnesses, examined for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documentsmarked for the Hespondent

NIL

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer.

Dated the 4th day ofNovember, 2010 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.NO.3 /2007

BETWEEN:

Sri Noone Sammaiah,

S/o Ramułu

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, FlatNo.G-7,Ground Floor, Rajeshwari , Gayatri Sadan, Opp . Badruka Jr. College

For Girls , Kachiguda,

Petitioner Hyderabad

AND

1. The General Manager ,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri , Adilabad District

2. The Colliery Manager /Superintendent ofMine , M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , KK-5 Incline , Mandarmarri , Adilabad District ... Respondents [भाग -सखंड3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

APPEARANCES:

Forthe Petitioner : M/ s . A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva Reddy,Advocates

FortheRespondent : M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya- laxmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

Thispetition under Sec . 2A (2) of I. D. Act, 1947 has beenfiledbySri Noone Sammaiah ex-badli filler to set aside. the termination order dated 28-10-1998 and to reinstate the. Petitioner workman with full back wages.

contention thathe was not afforded proper opportunity is incorrect. Due nodces were given to the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceedings . The noticewas acknowledged bythe Petitioner and be participated inthe enquiry proceeding, Petitioner did not avalled the antistance ofco-worker though he was given the opportunity to take the help of a co-worker. Petitioner did not produce may sickness proof, thus he failed to produce any documentary evidence beforethe Enquiry Officer. During the year 1995 to1998 also the Petitioner was not reguler to birduties.He has put in 121 , 50 and 39 musters in the yours 1995, 1997. and 1998 respectively and in the year 1996 only he got 182. musters. This prove that the Petitioner was got sincere to his work. He intentionally abeested himself without a reason or cause . The company has provided medical facilities by establishing hospitals, the Petitioner did not reported to the company hospital for his sickness them, the submission that he was absent due to ill-health is unfounded, Enquiry Officer has given his finding on the materialplacedbefore him by the management and no lauk can be find in the enquiry report, it is baand on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal order is not disproportions themisconduct committed by him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties company has dismissed him which is neither illegal nor invalid. any το

4. Parties were directed to produce evidence in support oftheir claims. Petitioner has filed xertex copies of enquiry proceeding consists of report and disinissal örder dated 28-10-1998 . However, the Respondent has filled chargesheet, acknowledgement of chargesheet , explanation submitted by the Petitioner, notice of enquiry, entire domestic enquiry proceedings, show cause notice issued to him, his explanation against show cause notice and dismissal order.

5. Coming to the point of legality and validity of domestic enquiry conducted by the wisnagement it is pertinent to mention that Learited Counsel for the Petitioner movedmemo dated 17-2-2009 conceding the validity and legality of the domestic enquiry it such , the domestic enquiry was held to be legal and valid.

6. Ihaveheard counsels for the parties and has gope through the claim petition , counter statement and documents filed by the parties.

2.It is allegedbythe Petitioner that he was appointed asbadli filler on 9-5-1991 and later he was confirmed as coal filler in the year 1996. He was regular to his duties till 1996. During the year 1997 the Petitioner fell sick for some time and he has undergone appendicitis operation. All these impediments refrained the Petitioner not to be regular to his duties during the year 1997. A chargesheet dated 28-3-1998 was issued alleging that the Petitioner has worked for 50 days during 1997 which amount to misconduct under company's Standing Orders No. 25.25. The Petitioner has submitted his explanation but the Respondentwere not satisfied and ordered for departmental enquiry. TheEnquiry Officer conducted the enquiry with: pre-determined notion. The enquiry was not valid in nature. The EnquiryOfficer submitted his report. On the basis of enquiry report a show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner against which Petitioner submitted his reply, the Disciplinary Authority passed dismissal order dated 28-10-1998 without considering the submission made by thePetitioner was absent due to ill-health and the same was stated by the Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer , no challenge was made from the side of the management as such, the submission made by the Petitioner would have been deemed to be correct but the Enquiry Officer has not considered the submission made by the Petitioner workman. He submitted his enquiry report with a pre-determined notion as such , the order passed on such enquiry report is bad anddeserve to be quashed . Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner in the enquiry proceeding. Dismissal order based on that enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and is liable to be treated as bad in law. Hence, it is prayed that the impugned order be quashed and the Respondent bedirected to reinstate the Petitioner with back wages and all consequential benefits.

7. It is admitted fact that the Potitioner has put in only 50 musters during the year 1997 for which a chargesheet dated 25/28-3-1998 was issuedto the Petitioner against which the Petitioner filed his explanation stating therein that he remained absent because of ill-health. It is also admitted that domestic enquiry was conducted and Petitioner participated in the domestic enquiry. On the basis of the report submitted by the Enquiry Offi dismissal order has been passed against the Petitioner which is under challenge. In this case this tribunal has to consider: Officer 3. Management has submitted his reply alleging therein that Petitioner remained absent for the year 1997 but for 50 days which hampered the working of the company, the absence of the Petitioner was without any sufficient cause which is grave misconduct within the Standing Orders 25.25 ofthe company and dismissal is not bad in the light ofthe case law reported in 1996(1 ) SCC302 State ofU.P. andOthers Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh. Petitioner's 628

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

(1) Whether the absence of Petitioner during thẹ year 1997 was for any sufficient and reasonable causeor not and the report of Enquiry Officer is based on evidence or not ?

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is disproportionate to the misconduct committed by the Petitiomer ?

the Enquiry Officer also. As such , the previous absence cannot be taken into consideration but the absence in the year 1997 is surely a grave misconduct and management has not committed any mistake in passing the punishment ofdismissal against the Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that the Petitioner's family is starving due to dismissal of the Petitioner against which Learned Counsel for the Respondent has argued that Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of the family members , the Petitioner was a unwilling worker who has not cared to perform his duties with sincerity as such, the punishment was proper and interference is not required inthis case.

11. I agree with the argument ofthe Learned Counsel for the Respondent and I am also ofthe considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither excessive nor disproportionate and Petitioner is not a deserving person for any lenient view to be taken in favour ofthe Petitioner. The Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of his family members , no interference is required in the matter of the punishment. Point No. 2 is decided accordingly.

12. From the above discussion , this tribunal is ofthe considered opinion that the claim petition is unfounded, no interference is required in this case . Petitioner is not entitled for any relief, petition deserves to be dismissed, and it is dismissed. Hence , this award.

Awardpassed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 4th day of November , 2010,

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer

Appendix of evidence 8. Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has submitted that he was sick and had undergone appendicitis operation due to which he rematied absent during the year 1997 and put in 50musters duringduring thethe yearyear I1997. HisHis statementstatement was recorded by the Enquiry Officer, during course of the enquiry he stated that he worked for 50 days and remained absent for the rest ofdays in 1997 due to health problems . But has not been able to provide any single document before the EnquiryOfficer to substantiate his allegations . In his reply dated 17-7-98 hewrote that he was not keeping good health due to which he could not awood to his duties regularly. As against this, the management has produced Sri . K. Rajanmallu, Spl . Grade Clerk and Sri K. Ranga Rao, Spl .Grade Clerk to prove that Petitioner retained absent without any leave orwithout any intimation during the year 1997 from January to December. Since absence of the Petitioner was admittedby the Petitioner himself it was the sole duty of the Petitioner to prove that his absence was due to any cogent reason or sufficient cause . Petitioner was not able to prove ththat his absence during the year 1997 was due to sufficient season, Though he stated that he was absent due to ill-health but he has not able provide any evidence or proof in support of his illness or treatment for ill -health. Even ifit is presumed that Peilicet remained absent due to the ill-health why he did not inform his superiors regarding the same has not been explained by the Petitioner. Thus, the finding of the Enquiry Officer that Petitioner's absence during the year 1997 were based on evidence and reasoning and no fhult can be mind in the finding arrived at by the Enquiry Offi

Witnesses examined forthePetitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL NIL

9. This tribunal, is also of the opinion that the Petitioner remained absent without any intimation to his employer during the year 1997 , his absence was without any reasonable or sufficient cause and thereby the Petitioner has comimitied misconduct mentioned in para 25.25 ofthe Standing Orders of the company. Point No. 1 is decilled accordingly.

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2010 10. Point No. 2 : So far as the question ofpunishment is concerned the Petitioner has not been able to justify his absence during the year 1997, he has voluntarily admitted before the Enquiry Officer that he remained absent during 1997 and could attend only 50 musters though the Respondent management has stated in the counter statement that Petitioner remained absent during the year 1995, 1996 and in 1998 also which was not mentioned in the chargesheet . However , this fact was not brought before

का. आ. 181.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकछ एस. सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों औरउसकी कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कैन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक 629 [ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

FortheRespondent : M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya- laxmi Panguluri,Advocates अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

AWARD

[सं. एल-22013/ 1 /2010- आई आर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010

This petition under Sec . 2A(2) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has been filed by Sri Pulipaka Mallesh, ex-badli filler in light ofthe judgment ofthe Hon'ble High Court ofAndhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of *India and two others to set aside the termination order dated 8-12-2000 and to reinstate the Petitioner workman with full back wages .

S.O. 181.-In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 46/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2010

[No. L-22013/ 1 /2010- IR(C- II) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

Dated the 3rd day ofNovember , 2010

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. NO , 46/2007

BETWEEN:

Sri PulipakaMallesh,

Petitioner

S/ oYellaiah, C/ o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate , Flat No.G7,Ground Floor, Rajeshwari, Gayatri Sadan, Opp. Badruka Jr. College ForGirls , Kachiguda, Hyderabad

AND

1. TheGeneral Manager, M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , MandamarriArea, Mandamarri ,Adilabad District

2. Itis alleged by the Petitioner that he was appointed asbadli filler on 6-6-1990 and he was regular to his duties from the date of his appointment till 1998. The Petitioner sufferedwith ill-health due to Tuberculosis and other family problems, as such he could not be regular to his duties in the year 1999. He took treatment in company's hospital and also from government hospital at Peddapalli . A chargesheet dated 19-1-2000 was issued alleging that the Petitioner could not be regular during the year 1999 which amount to misconduct under company's Standing Orders No. 25.25 . The Petitioner has submitted his explanation but the Respondents were not satisfied and ordered for departmental enquiry. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry with pre-determined notion . The enquiry was not valid in nature. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on the basis of a show cause notice dated 13-8-2000 to the Petitioner against which Petitioner submitted his reply on the 18-9-2000. The Disciplinary Authority did not consider the submission made by the Petitioner and passed dismissal order of Petitioner w.e.f 14-12-2000 vide order dated 8-12-2000 . The Petitioner was absent due to ill-health and the same was stated by the Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer, no challenge was made from the side of. the management as such, the submission made by the Petitioner would have been. deemed to be correct but the Enquiry Officer has not considered the submission made by the Petitioner workman . He submitted his enquiry report with a pre-determined notion as such , the order passed on such enquiry report is bad and deserve to be quashed, Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner in the enquiry proceeding. He prayed to declare the impugned order of the Respondent No. 1 dated 8-12-2000 as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service with continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits.

2. The Superintendent ofMines , M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., KK- 1 Incline , Kalyankhani ,

Adilabad District

Respondents

APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : M/s . A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates .

3.Management has submitted his reply alleging thereinthat Petitioner remained absent during the year 1999 whichhampered the working of the company, the absence ofthePetitioner was without any sufficientcause which is gravemisconduct within the Standing Orders 25,25 of the company and dismissal is not bad in the light of the case 3GI/11-38 630

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25, 1932

chargesheet dated 19-1-2000 was issued to the Petitioner against which the Petitioner filed his explanation stating therein that he remained absent because of ill -health and family problems . It is also admitted that domestic enquiry wasconducted and Petitioner participated in the domestic enquiry. On the basis of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer dismissal order has been passed against the Petitioner which is under challenge. In this case this tribunal has to consider,

(1) Whether the absence of Petitioner during the year 1999 was for any sufficient and reasonable cause or not and the report ofEnquiry Officer is ⚫ based on evidence or not ?

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is disproportionate to the misconduct committedby the Petitioner ?

law reported in 1996(1 ) SCC 302 State of U.P. and Others Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh . It is submitted that the Petitioner was initially appointed in the Respondent's company on 15-6-1990 as badli filler. It is submitted that Petitioner has put in only23 musters in the year 1999 which constituted misconductunder Company's Standing Orders No. 25.25, thereby he was issued with chargesheet dated 19-1-2000. Petitioner submitted his explanation dated 19-2-2000 which is not satisfactory. Petitioner's contention that he was not afforded proper opportunity is incorrect. Due notices were given to the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceedings . The notice was acknowledged by the Petitioner and he participated in the enquiry proceeding . Pentionerdid not availed the assistance of co - worker though he was given the opportunity to take the help of a co- worker. Petitioner did not produce any sickness proof, thus he failedto produce any documentary evidence before the Enquiry Officer. During the year 1997. to 2000 also the Petitionerwasnot regular to his duties . In the year 1997 he put in only 17musters , in 1998-89 musters , in 1999-23 musters and in the year 2000 he had put in 14 musters . This prove that the Petitioner was not sincere to his work . He intentionally absented himself without any reason or cause. The company has provided medical facilities by establishing hospitals, the Petitioner did not reported to the company,hospital for his sickness thus , his submission that he was absent due to ill -health is unfounded. Enquiry Officerhas given his finding on the basis of material placed before him by the management and no fault can be find in the enquiry report, it is based on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal order is not disproportionate to the misconduct committedby him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties company has dismissed him which is neither illegal nor invalid.

4. Parties were directed to produce documents evidence in support of their claims . Petitioner has filed xerox copies ofchargesheet dated 19-1-2000 , enquiry report, enquiry proceeding and dismissal order dated 8-12-2000. However, the Respondent has filed chargesheet with acknowledgement, explanation ofthe Petitioner, notice of enquiry, entire domestic enquiry proceedings , enquiry report, show cause notice issued to him and dismissal order.

5. Coming to the point of the legality and validity of domesticenquiry held by the managementit is pertinent to mention that Learned Counsel for the Petitioner moved mermo dated 27-2-2009 conceding the validity and legality ofthedomestic enquiry as such, the domestic enquiry was held tobe legal and valid.

8.Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has submitted that he remained ill during the year 1999 as he suffered from Tuberculosis and other ailments due to which he remained absent and put in 23 musters during the year 1999. His statementwas recorded by the Enquiry Officer , during the course ofthe enquiry he stated that he worked for 23 days and remained absent during the year 1999 for the rest of days due to health problems and personal problems. He suffered from Tuberculosis and other ailments due to which he remained absent but has not been able to provide any single document before the Enquiry Officer to substantiate his allegations . In his reply dated 19-2-2000 he simply written that " I have been suffering with T.B. , my family members were also suffering as same with me" . As against this, the management has produced Sri J. Rajam , Office Supdt. and Sri D. V. Prasada Rao , Spl . Grade Clerk to prove thatPetitioner remained absent without any leave or without any intimation during the year 1999 from January to December and attended only for 23 musters . Since absence ofthe Petitioner was admitted by the Petitioner himself it was the sole duty ofthe Petitioner to prove that his absence wasdue to any cogent reason or sufficient cause . Petitioner was not able to prove that his absence during the year 1999 was due to sufficient reason . Though , he stated that he was absent due to ill - health and as he was suffering from Tuberculosis but he has not provided any evidence or proof in support of his illness or illness of any of his family members . Even if it is presumed that Petitioner remained absent due to the ill -health ofhis family members why he did not inform his superiors regarding his illness has not been explained by the Petitioner. Thus , the finding ofthe EnquiryOfficer that Petitioner's absence during the year 1999 was based on evidence and reasoning and no fault can be find in the finding arrived at by the Enquiry Officer.

6.Ihave heard counsels for the parties and has gone through the claim petition , counter statement and documents filedby the parties.

9. This Tribunal is also of the opinion that the Petitioner remained absent without any intimation to his 7. It is admitted fact that the Petitioner has put in only 23 musters during the year 1999 for which a 631 [ भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

Documents marked for the Petitioner employer during the year 1999 , except for 23 days , his absence was without any reasonable or sufficient cause and thereby the Petitioner has committed misconduct mentioned in para 25.25 of the Standing Orders of the Company. Point No. 1 is decided accordingly.

NIL Documents marked for the Respondent NIL नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2010

का. आ. 182.-सौधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल.. के प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्यकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती हैं, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22013/1 /2010- आई. आर ( सी-11 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010 10. Point No. 2 : So far as the question ofpunishment isconcerned the Petitioner has not been able tojustify his absence during the year 1999 he has voluntarily admitted before the Enquiry Officer that he remained absent during 1999 and could attend only 23 misters though the Respondent management has stated in the counter statement that Petitioner remained absent during the year 1997 and in 1998 which was not mentioned in the chargesheet . However, this fact was not brought before the Enquiry Officer also . As such , the previous absence camot be taken into consideration but the absence in the year 1999 is surely a grave misconduct and management has not committed any mistake in passing the punishment ofdismissal against the Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that the Petitioner's family is starving due to dismissal of the Petitioner against which Learned Counsel for the Respondent has argued that Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of the family members , the Petitioner was a unwilling workerwho has not cared to perform his duties with- sincerity as such, the punishment was proper and interference is not required inthis case .

S.O. 182.-Laursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industri.. ! Disputus Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Governmer t hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2007) of the Cenu ! Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, received by the Central Government on 24-12-2010

[No.1-22013/1 /2010- IR(C-11 )] D S. S. SRINT ASA RAO DuskOfficer

: ANNEXURE

11. I agree with the argument ofthe Learned Courisel for the Respondent and I am also ofthe considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither. excessive nor disproportionate and Petitioner is not a deserving person for any lenient view, to be taken in favour . ofthe Petitioner. The Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of his family members , no interference is required in the matter of the punishment . Point No. 2 is decided accordingly.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer.

12. From the above discussion , this tribunal is of the considered opinion that the claim petition is unfounded, no interference is required in this case . Petitioner is not entitled for any relief, petition deserves to be dismissed, it isdismissed and hence , this award.

Dated the 2ndday ofNovember, 2010 3 Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

INDUSTRIAL, DISPUTE L.C. NO . 45/2007

BETWEEN:

Dictated to Smt . P. Phan: Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 3rd day of November,2010.

Sri Beesaboina Ravinder,

S/o Rajamallu,

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer

Appendix ofEvidence

C/o Smt . A. Sarojana, Advocate , FlatNo. G7, Ground Floor, Rajeshwari, Gayatri Sadan, Opp. Badruka Jr. College Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

Petitioner

ForGirls , Kachiguda, Hyderabad.

NIL

And 632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1. The General Manager,

reinstate the Petitioner with all consequential benefits etc.

M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri ,AdilabadDistrict

3. Management has submitted his reply alleging 2. The Colliery Manager/Superintendent ofMines ,

M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. ,

KK- 1 Incline, Mandamarri

Adilabad District

Respondents

APPEARANCES :

ForthePetitioner : M/ s . A. Sarojana and K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya- laxmi Panguluri ,Advocates .

AWARD

This petition under Sec . 2A(2) of the I. D. Act , 1947. has been filed by Sri Beesabonia Ravinder, ex-badli filler to set aside the termination order dated 25-4-1999 and to reinstate the Petitioner workman with full back wages .

therein that Petitioner remained absent for the year 1997 which hampered the working of the company, the absence ofthe Petitioner was without any sufficient cause which is grave misconduct within the Standing Orders 25.25 of the company and dismissal is not bad in the light of the case lawreported in 1996( 1 ) SCC 302 State ofU.P. and othersVs. Ashok Kumar Singh . Petitioner's contention that he was not afforded proper opportunity is incorrect. Due notices were given to the Petitioner to participate in the enquiry proceeding. The notice was acknowledged by the Petitioner and he participated in the enquiry proceeding . Petitioner did not availed the assistance of co- worker though he was given the opportunity to take the help of a co -worker. Petitioner did not produce any sickness proof, thus he failed to produce any documentary evidence before the Enquiry Officer. During the years 1995, 1996 and 1997 also the Petitioner was not regular to his duties . In the year 1995 he had put in 73 musters , in 1966-22 musters , and 1997 he had put in 44 musters . After chargesheet was given , in the year 1998 also he had put in only 16 musters and upto 4-5-1999 ' Nil' musters . This proves that the Petitioner was not sincere to his work . He intentionally absented himself without any reason or cause . The company has produced medical facilities by establishing hospitals, the Petitioner did not reported to the company hospital for his sickness thus , his submission that he was absent due to ill -health is unfounded, Enquiry Officer has given his finding onthe material placed before him by the management and no fault can be find in the enquiry report , it is based on evidence and Petitioner's dismissal order is dispro- portionate to the misconduct committed by him since Petitioner was not regular to his duties company has dismissed him which is neither illegal nor invalid.

4. Parties were directed to produce documentary evidence in support of their claims . Petitioner has filed enquiring proceeding , enquiry report and dismissal order dated 25-4-1999. However, the Respondent has filed chargesheet , explanation to chargesheet, entire domestic enquiry proceedings file, show cause notice issued to him , his explanation against show cause notice, copy of the statement of the witnesses and that of the Petitioner himself and dismissal order.

5. Coming to the point of the legality and validity of domestic enquiry held by the management it is pertinent to mention that Learned Counsel for the Petitioner moved memo dated 5-3-2009 conceding the validity and legality of the domestic enquiry as such , the domestic enquiry was held to be legal and valid.

6.I have heard counsels for the parties and has gone through the claim petition , counter statement and documents filed by the parties .

2. It is allegedby the Petitioner that he was appointed as badli filler on 15-12-1988 . He was regular to his duties but during the year 1997 the Petitioner suffered with ill- health, i.e. ,Gastrological problems and Typhoid and other family problems, as such he could not be regular to his duties.His father and wife expired, resulting in great mental agony and family disturbance to the Petitioner which also contributed tohis irregular attendance .A chargesheet dated 20-3-1998 was issued alleging that the Petitioner was not regular to his duties during the year 1997 which amount to misconduct under Company's Standing Orders No. 25.25. The Petitioner has submitted his explanation but the Respondent were not satisfied and ordered for departmental enquiry. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry with pre-determined notion . The enquiry was not valid in nature . The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on the basis of a show cause notice dated 31-12-1998 to the Petitioner against which Petitioner submitted his reply. The Disciplinary Authority did not consider the submission made by the Petitioner and passed dismissal order of Petitioner w.e.f. 4-4-1999 vide order dated 25-4-1999 . The Petitioner was absent due to ill - health and the same was stated by the Petitionerbefore the EnquiryOfficer, no challenge was made from the side of the management as such, the submission made by the Petitioner would have been deemed to be correct but the Enquiry Officer has not considered the submission made by the Petitioner workman . He submitted his enquiry report with a predetermined notion as such , the order passed on such enquiry report is bad and deserve to be quashed. Proper opportunity was not given to the Petitioner in the enquiry proceeding . The action of the Respondents in dismissing the Petitioner from service is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and hence, be set aside directing the Respondents to [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

7. It is admitted fact that the Petitioner has put in only 14 musters during the year 1997 for which a chargesheet dated 20-3-1998 was issued to the Petitioner against which the Petitioner filed his explanation stating therein that he remained absentdue to ill-health and family problems . It is also admitted that domestic enquiry was conducted and Petitioner participated in the domestic enquiry. On the basis of the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer dismissal order has been passed against the Petitioner which is under challenge . In this case this Tribunal has to consider :

(1 ) Whether the absence of Petitioner during the year 1997 was for any sufficient and reasonable cause or not and the report of Enquiry Officer is based on evidence, or not ?

(2) Whether the punishment imposed upon the Petitioner is disproportionate to the misconduct committedby the Petitioner ?

8. Point No. 1 : The Petitioner has submitted that he remained il ! during the year 1997 due to which he remained absent and put in 14 musters during the year 1997. His statement was recorded by the Enquiry Officer and during the course of the enquiry he stated that he worked for 14 days and remained absent for the rest of days due to health problems and personal problems . His wife and father both expired resulting in mental agony and family disturbance to Petitioner. But has not been able to provide any single document before the Enquiry Officer to substantiate his allegations . In his reply dated 22-4-1998 he has not mentioned that his wife and father passed away inthe year 1997. He simply written that he could not perform his duty due to his suffering from stomach pain and typhoid fever and also untold troubles . As against this , the management has produced Sri A. Prakash , Clerk Gr . I and Sri D.V. Prasada Rao , Spl . Grade Clerk to prove that Petitioner remained absent without any leave or without any intimationduring the year 1997. Since absence ofthe Petitioner was admitted by the Petitioner himself it was the sole duty of the Petitioner to prove that his absence was due to any cogent reason or sufficient cause . Petitioner was unable to prove that his absence during the year 1997 was due to sufficient reason . Though , he stated that he was absent due to ill-health but he is not able to provide any evidence or proof in support of his illness or illness of any of his family members . Even if it is presumed that Petitioner remained absent due to the ill-health why he did not informed his superiors regarding his illness, has not been explained by the Petitioner. He has not disclosed the date of death of his wife or his father. Thus , the finding of the Enquiry Officer that Petitioner's absence during the year 1997 was without reason and sufficient cause, is based on evidence and reasoning and no fault can be find in the finding arrived at by the Enquiry Officer.

633

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25, 1932

9. This tribunal is also of the opinion that the Petitioner remained absent without any intimation to his employer during the year 1997, his absence was without any reasonable or sufficient cause and thereby the Petitioner has committed misconduct mentioned in para 25.25 ofthe Standing Orders ofthe company. Point No. 1 is decided accordingly.

10. Point No.2: So far as the question ofpunishment isconcerned the Petitioner has not been able to justify his absence during the year 1997, he has voluntarily admitted before the Enquiry Officer that he remained absent during 1997 and could attend only 14 musters though the Respondent management has stated in the counter statement that Petitioner remained absent during the year 1995 and 1996 also which was not mentioned in the chargesheet. However, this fact was not brought before the Enquiry Officer also . As such , the previous absence cannot be taken into consideration but the absence in the year 1997 is surely a grave misconduct and management has not committed,any mistake in passing the punishment ofdismissal against the Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that the Petitioner's family is starving due to dismissal of the Petitioner against which Learned Counsel for the Respondent has argued that Petitioher himself is responsible for the starvation of the familymembers, the Petitioner was a unwilling worker who has not cared to perform his duties with sincerity as such, the punishment was proper and interference is not required inthis case..

11. I agree with the argument of the Learned Counsel for the Respondent and I am also of the considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is neither excessive nor disproportionate and Petitioner is not a deserving person for any lenient view, to be taken in favour ofthe Petitioner. The Petitioner himself is responsible for the starvation of his family members, no interference is required in the matter of the punishment. Point No. 2 is decided accordingly.

12. From the above discussion, this tribunal, is of the considered opinion that the claim petition is unfounded, no interference is required in this case. Petitioner is not entitled for any relief, petition deserves to be dismissed, and hence, this award .

Awardpassed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 2nd day of November, 2010.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer 634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

AND

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

1. The ChiefGeneral Manager ,

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Respondent

NIL

M/sSingareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Ramagundam Area- 1 , Ramagundam, Godavarikhani

Documents marked for the Petitioner.

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

2. The Managing Director (Admn. ) , M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Post: Kothagudem , Distt.: Khammam

Respondents NIL

APPEARANCES :

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

For the Petitioner : Sri S. Bhagawantha Rao , Advocate .

For the Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma and Vijaya- laxmi Panguluri , Advocates .

AWARD

का. आ. 183.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1 /2010- आईआर ( सी-11 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

Thispetition under Sec. 24 (2) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has been filed by Sri Goliwada Raja Babu , ex - employee of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , challenging the orderofdismissal dated 22-3-2001 and for his reinstatement in service with all the back wages and consequential benefits.

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010

S.O. 183.In pursuance ofSection 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court ,, Hyderabad now as 'shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2010

J [No. L-22013/ 1/2010- IR(C - II)] D. S. S. SRINIVASARAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT:

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 26th day ofNovember, 2010

Industrial Dispute L. C. No. 92/2007 ,

BETWEEN:

2. It has been alleged in the claim petition that the Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 31-7-1996. He has completed B. Com. and P.G. diploma in Personal Management and Industrial Relationship and having Higher certificates of typing in Telugu and English languages . While working so he was issued with the chargesheet dated 12-8-98 for his absenteeism from duty. The Petitioner was totally sick. He sustained mine accident, his both legs were fractured . He sustained injuries in his head and has taken treatment in area hospital . He has put in 130 musters in 1996 , 250 musters in 1997 , 103 musters in 1998. However, vague removal order was issued under company's Standing Orders No. 25.25. Before order of removal enquiry was conducted, but no document was supplied to the Petitioner neither memo of charge or chargesheet no subsistence allowance was allowed to the Petitioner. The entire enquiry is null and void for non- payment of subsistence allowance. No proper opportunity was afforded to the Petitioner . The Petitioner was called upon to participate at Kothagudem for consideration of his case along with other case of absenteeism . The Petitioner attended the meeting on 21-4-2003 but no relief was granted to the Petitioner. Petitioner made several requests but no heed was paid hence , he is forced to file the petition after six years of his dismissal from service.

Golliwada RajaBabu ,

L C/o Smt . A. Sarojana, Advocate , Flat No. G- 7, Ground Floor, Rajeshwari , Gayatri Sadan, Opp.Badruka Jr. College ForGirls,

3. Respondent management has filed counter statement wherein it is submitted that the post of badli filler does not require any educational qualification . The Petitioner was appointed as badli filler on 31-7-1996, he

Petitioner

Kachiguda, Hyderabad 635 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011/पौष 25 , 1932

used to remain absent. He put in only 71 musters during the year 1997 , as such a charge sheet was issued to him .

for the Petitioner workman to file written or oral argument but, after taking several dates Learned Counsel for the Petitioner did not argue the case . Hence, the arguments were closed. I have considered and has perused the claim statement, counter statement and evidence of the parties coupled with the departmental proceedings , on the basis of the pleadings and documentary evidence of the parties this tribunal has to consider :

(1) " Whether the action of the management in terminating the services of the Petitioner workman is illegal and unjustified ?

(II) Whether Petitioner workman remained absent for reasonable and valid cause during the year 1997?

(III) Whether the Petitioner suffered from delay and latches ?

(IV) Whether the Petitioner is entitled for any relief? Ifyes , then to what relief ? " The Petitioner has not put in 130 musters in 1996, 250 musters in 1997 or 103 musters in 1998. He has put in 95 musters in 1996 , 71 musters in 1997, 3 musters in 1998 and 32musters in 1999. This prove that the Petitioner is ahabitual absentee . He was issued with a chargesheet for his absenteeism in the year 1997 to which he did not submit any explanation even then enquiry was conducted and he participated in the enquiry. Witnesses were examined in his presence. The workman examined himself in his defence, however, his statement and submissions were not found to be satisfactory. Enquiry Officer submitted his report stating that the charges against the Petitioner were proved on the basis of which show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner and Disciplinary Authority passed order of dismissal . His appeal was also dismissed. The Petitioner remained silent for six years and has filed this petition after six years with much delay and latches. There is no explanation for the filing of this petition after such delay and latches , the petition deserves to be dismissed on this ground alone . The petition is baseless having no force and deserves to be dismissed.

4. Both the parties have filed their documentary evidence . Petitioner filed hand written application, dated 5-12-2006, dismissal order dated 20-3-2001 , salary slip , appointment letter dated 28-7-1996, xerox copy ofmedical certificates dated 29-4-97 , 28-5-97 and undated medical certificate for period from 1-6-97 to 31-8-97, copy of the chargesheet, xerox copy of enquiry report, xerox copy of the enquiry proceeding . Respondent management has also filed the original chargesheet dated 12-9-98 , acknowledgement receipt of the enquiry notice , enquiry notice , doemstic enquiry proceeding filed which consists of the original medical certificate dated 29-4-97 , 28-5-97 and that undated medical certificate for the period from 1-6-97 to 31-8-97 , enquiry report , show eause notice and dismissal order.

7. Point Nos. (1) and (II) : It is admitted case ofthe parties that Petitioner is appointed on 31-7-1996 as badli filler and during the year 1997, he remained absent and put in only 71 musters as such, a chargesheet was issued to him and he was asked to submit his explanation . It is also admitted that domestic enquiry was conducted in which the Petitioner participated wherein he has produced three medical certificates, first certificate relates to aperiod from 20-4-1997 to 28-4-1997, second certificate relates to a period from 19-5-1997 to 27-5-1997. This certificate was produced during course of enquiry and the Enquiry Officer has considered the documents . Learned Counsel in his claim statement has contended that these certificates were not considered by the Enquiry Officer. I have gone through the enquiry report, the Enquiry Officer has reported that the Petitioner has filed his medical certificates .He has gone through the medical certificates , in his report he has concluded that these medical certificate have been filed with an attempt to cover up absence to some extent . Though the Learned Counsel for the workman has not placed any argument before this tribunal , even then this tribunal has to consider whether the filing ofthis medical certificate or themedical certificate justified the absence of Petitioner or not.

5.Before entering into the merits of the case under Sec. 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the question of legality and validity of domestic enquiry was considered andby the order dated 28-1-2010 the domestic enquirywas held to be legal and valid as the Petitioner conceded to the said question .

6. The case was posted for the argument . Learned Counsel for the Respondent submitted his written arguments .Every opportunity was afforded for the counsel

8. I have considered each and every medical certificate,the first medical certificate relate to the period 20-4-1997 to 28-4-1997 wherein the disease has been mentioned as UTI , the second certificate relate toa period 636

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

any reasonable or genuine cause . Thus , the management has not committed any illegality or unjustifiability in dismissing a person who is not interested to perform his duties . Though it is not alleged in counter but it appears that Petitioner is a highly qualified person holding the degree ofB. Com . , and P.G. diploma in Industrial Relations, he might not be interested in performing the job of badli filler or coal filler and he must have avoided to perform duties , he absented himself from duties . The absence is unjustfiable and without any reason or sufficient grounds and Point Nos . 1 and 2 decided accordingly.

10. Point No. 3 : The Petitioner was dismissed in the year 2001. He did not file the claim petition within any reasonable period. He has filed it after lapse of six years and he has not been able to explain the reasons for delay, thus, it suffers from delay and latches . Though there is no limitation prescribed for proceeding under Sec . 2A (2 ) as such , it will not have effect on the merits of the case . Point No. 3 is decided accordingly.

11. Point No. 4 : The Petitioner has absented himself without any reasonable and sufficient reasons . He appears to be an unwilling woker, as such, he is not entitled for any relief and the Punishment awarded is justifiable and in proportion to the misconduct committed by him.

12. From the above discussion , this triburial is ofthe opinion that the claim petition is devoid of any merit , Petitioner does not deserve any sympathy and he is not entitled for any relief. Petition is dismissed. Hence, this award.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 26th day of November,2010 .

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

from 19-5-1997 to 27-5-1997 in which the disease has been mentioned as Malaria. Ifboth these certificates are treated tobe correct then the Petitioner remained absent for valid reasons for 8days in April and 9 days in the month ofMay. The chargesheet shows that the Petitioner has remained absent prior to 20-4-1997 on 1st to 4th, 7th, 8th, 16th of April, and thereafter on 30th April . Again he remained absent on 2nd, 4th, 8th to 12th, 14th , 15th, May. What was the reason to remain absent on these days in the month of April andMay, Petitioner has not been able to explain either before the Enquiry Officer or before this tribunal . Not only that the Petitioner was absent in the months of January, February and March. He has produced a third certificate that he was suffering from Jaundice and was under treatment ofDr. K. Indira, M.B.B.S. , D.GO. , who is supposed to be gynaecologist, a Doctor of ladies diseases . What has forced the Petitioner to take treatment under gynaecologist is not clear. Ifhe was suffering from the disease of Jaundice he would have undergone treatment of a physician and not of a gynaecologist. The third certificate shows that he wasunder the treatment of the gynaecologist from 1-6-1997 to 31-7-1997 but the attendance sheet and statement of the management witness has proved that the Petitioner has worked on23rd to 26th June and 12th to 13th of July and 7thAugust, 1997. This prove that the Petitioner was not under continuous treatment of Dr. K. Indira as has been mentionedby her. During this period also he has attended theoffice for few days . This amply proves that Petitioner has attempted to cover up his absence by producing these certificates which does not appear to be/genuine and I agree with the findings of the Enquiry Officer. There is no perversityor illegality in the finding ofthe EnquiryOfficer. ThePetitioner has not been able to prove why he remained absent on those days for which he has not produced medical certificates . Ifhe was continuously ill as alleged by him he would have produced the medical certificates . He has stated that he took treatment from the company hospital . He suffered fracture in his leg, sustained injuries in head while working in the mine but he has not been able to produce single piece ofpaper to show that he has suffered injuries during course of his duties or took treatment in company hospital . Thus, the entire allegation made in the claim staternent is devoid of any merit and without any basis.

NIL Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

9. The Petitioner has put in only 71 musters even if he remained absent for 9 days in April on account of UTI and 10 days in May on account of Malarial disease, his absence for rest of days are not clarified and justified by him. He has not been able to prove that his absence is for [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( i) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

नईदिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2010:

provide service conditions for employees of the Corporation. In 1994 Recruitment and PromotionRules came in force to govern service conditions of the employers of theCorporation.

का. आ. 184.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार हुडकों के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 71/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को24-12-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. L-42012/179/2005- आई. आर. (सी एम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the24th December, 2010

S.O.184.-In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government herebypublishes the award (Ref. No. 71/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of HUDCO, and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 24-12-2010

2. Cadres of the employees of the Corporation are classified in to Executive and Non -Executive Groups. In Executive cadres group " A" and group "B" posts are there while in Non-Executive cadres group "C" and group "D" posts are placed. Group "D" posts are further categorized in three categorias viz, skilled, semi -skilled andanskilled. In skilled category posts of Driver, Electrician, Plugber, Cattering andHouse Keeping official oxist, while liftwer falls in semi- skilled category. Unskilled category consist of Chowkidar, Sweeper, Mali , General Assistunt /Attendant ; Farash, Despatch Rider, Assistant Ferro Printer, Daftry Ferro Printer, Machine Operator and Mistry (Mason ).No post of Secerity Guard is available in either of the three categories ofgroup D post. Recruitinent togroup D. posts củabe made through two channels viz. (i ) direct recruitment . through Employment Exchange , and ( ii ) open masket through advertisement in case Employment Exchange fails to sponsor candidates within a specified period.

[No. 142012/ 179 /2005-IR(CM- II)] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI

Industrial Dispute No. 71/2006

Shri Sadanand Tiwari, S/o Shri Ravati Ram Tiwari , C/oGeneral Mazdoor Trade Union, Giri Nagar, Kalkaji, NewDelhi- 110049

Workman

Versus

TheExecutive Director, HMSI, HUDCO , F - 2 /12, Khelgaon , New Delhi - 110049

Management

3. To avail security services, the Corporation has entered into an agreement with M/ s. Vanguard Security and Fire Services Pvt . Ltd. (in short the Contractor)whe used to provide Security Guards to the Corporation, in February, 2005 contract was awarded to M/s . Pearl Security Services, to provide Secuity Guardsto the Corporation. Shri Sadanand Tiwari was eraployed as Security Guard by the Contractor to work at the premises of the Institute.He was paid his wages by the contractor. When contractwas awarded to M/s Pearl Security Services, Shri Tiwari could not get any job with the new contracts.Aggrieved by the factum of his disengagement by the new contractor, he raised a demand with the Corporation for reinstatement of his services. When his deinand was not conceded to , he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. When conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred, the dispate to this Tribunal for adjudication vide order No. L-42012/ 179/2005 -IR(CM-11 ) NewDelhi dated 14th of September, 2006 , with following terms:

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management ofHUDCO intermining the services of Shri Sadanand Tiwari w.e.f.20-2-2005 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled?"

4. Claim statement was filed by Shri Sadanand Tiwari

pleading that he was appointed as Security Guard by theCorporation w.e, f. 11-7-89. His last drawn wages were Rs. 5265/- P.M. He performed his duties in satisfactory manner. The Corporation adopted unfair labour practice qua him . Legal facilities such as appointment letter , bonus , leave book, weekly and festival holidays, over time and wage slip etc. were not provided to him . When he made a Housing and Urban Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) was incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 in April , 1970. The Corporation has grown tremendously and its operations spread all over the country. It has ZonalOffice atChennai , 14 Regional Offices , Seven Development Offices and one Business Development Office . Human Settlement Management Institute (hereinafter referred to as the Institute) is a unit ofthe Corporation, which is engaged in training and research activities . The Institute is locatedat Lodi Road , New Delhi , while its hostel is located at Asian Village, New Delhi . Service Regulations were there to

3GI/11-39 638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011/PAUSA 25 , 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

ofthe claimant . Shri B.S. Rana, authorised representative . raised his submissions on behalfofthe Corporation . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

Issue No. 1

request, he was assured by the Corporation that it would be providedwithin a short span of tinie . However, those facilitieswere not provided to him at any point of time. Whenhe persisted in his demand, the Corporation got annoyed. On 20th of February, 2005 his services were. terminated without any cause or reason . Neither his earned wages for the period 1-2-2005 till 20-2-2005 were paid nor terminal benefits were given to him . Action of termination ofhis services is illegal and void ab initio . He approached the Corporation many a times for reinstatement of his services but tono avail. He served a nofite ofdemand on theCorporation on 22-3-2005 , which demand was neither concededto nor responded. He faised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer and ultimately reference was made to this Tribunal for adjudication . He seeks reinstatement in service ofthe Corporation with continuity and full back wages.

10. Shri Sadanand Tiwari swears in his affidavit Ex. WW1 /A that he was appointed by the officers of the Corporation in July, 1989 as Security Guard. He worked under their supervision . His wages were paid by the officers ofthe Corporation and his last drawn salary was Rs . 5265. PM. Heworked with the Corporation till 20th of February , 2005. However, no appointment letter was issued to him. Whenhe raised a demand ofan appointment letter, a service certificate was issued in his favour. When he demanded appointment letter in February, 2005 , his services were dispensed with on 20th of February, 2005 without any reason . On 22nd of March, 2005 letter of demand was sent to the Corporation , copy of which is Ex. WW1/1 . He filed claim statement before the Conciliation Officer , copy of which is Ex. WW 1/3 . During the course of his cross examination , he unfolds that he had not moved any application to the Corporation or the Institute for job . He concedes that employees of the Corporation were issued identity cards, while no identity card was issued to him. He projects that he had not written any letter to the Corporation asking ESI and Provident Fund facilities .

5. Claim was demurred by the Corporation pleading that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the parties . The Corporation agitates that the reference was made by the appropriate Government without application ofmind to the facts and in an arbitrary manner. It was projected that the claimant was an employee ofthe Contractor, since a contract was awarded to him to provide security services. The chairmant was engaged by the Conractor on 11-7-89. There was no question ofproviding any legal facilities to the claimant by the Corporation. Contract ofthe Contractor came to an end on 31-1-2005, and thereafter contract to provide security services was awardedto M/s . Pearl Security Services w.e.f. 1-2-2005. There was no question of terminating services of the claimantby the Corporation , as claimed by him . It has been projected that claim statement , being devoid of merits, is liable to be rejected.

6. In the rejoinder the claimant reiterates facts pleaded by him in the claim statement.

7. On pleadings ofthe parties following issues were settled:

1. Whether there was no relationship of employer and employee between the parties ?

11. Shri U.S. Dagar unfolds that there is no post of Security Guard with the Corporation . The Corporation engages services of Security Guards through a contractor. An agreement was executed between the Corporation and M/s. Venguard Security and Fire Services Pvt . Ltd. in 1994, copy ofwhich is Ex . MW 1/2 . Shri Sadanand Tiwari never applied for job either to the Corporation or to the Institute. During the course of his cross - examination, he concedes that reports Ex . MW 1 /W4 to Ex . MW 1 /W20 weresubmittedby the Caretaker to the Welfare Officer of the Institute . He further concedes that certificates Ex . MW 1 /W2 and Ex . MW 1 /W3 bear signatures of Dr. Kulwant Singh , the Executive Director ofthe Institutes 2. Whether there was no industrial dispute for want of relationship of employer and employee between the parties ?

3. As in terms of reference .

4. Relief.

8. Claimanthas examined himselfin support ofhis claim . He opted not to examine any other witness . The Corporation has examined Shri U.S. Dagar (MW 1 ) , R.N. Biswas (MW2) and Shri Rajesh Mehta (MW 3 ) in support ofits defence.

12. Shri R.N. Biswas , presents that Dr. Kulwant Singh was not authorised to issue experience certificate to an employee . He unfolds that in February, 2003 , Dr. Singh was placed under suspension vide communication Ex . MW 2/1 . Punishment was awarded to him which was communicated vide letter dated 7-6-05 , copy of which is Ex . MW 2/2. List of the employees of the Institute is Ex. MW 2/3 . In December, 2003 Dr. Singh retired and Punishment was awarded to him after his retirement . He remained under suspension till the date of his retirement . Hedisputes that Dr. Singh was competent to issue letters . referred above .

9.Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri Anil Singhal , authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

"This is to certify that Mr. Sada Nand Tiwari son of Shri Revti Raman Tiwari resident of L - 190, Saurav Vihar , Badarpur , Jaitpur, New Delhi- 110044 has been working as a security guard and posted at Human SettlementManagement Institute ofHUDCO, Asiad Village,NewDelhi-110049 since September, 1989. He performed his duties most diligently and sincerely. He is most reliable and industrious person having full integrity. He bears a good moral character. I wish him all success" .

Ex . MW 1/W3 unfolds facts thus ;

"It is certified that Shri Sadanand Tiwari is performing the duties of Security Guard in Housing and Urban Development Corporation at 212, Asiad Village. The said individual is performing shift duty. He may happen to go late at night due to nature ofduty" .

13. Shri Rajesh Mehta presents that SecurityGuards working in the premises ofthe Institute were employees of the Contractor. Ex . MW 3/1 and Ex . MW 3/2 are copies of scrolls in respect of payment made to the Security Guards bytheContractor. Contractor used to keep original scrolls in his possession and submit photo copies to the Corporation . Ex. MW 3/3 is the copy of cheque alongwith its receipt given by Shri Tiwari to the Contractor. Ex .MW 3/4 isthe copy ofcomplaint made by Shri Tiwari and others , which was transmitted to the Contractor for action . During the course ofhis cross examination , he presents that being principal employer the Corporation used to check duties performed by Shri Tiwari . When Contractor used to submit his bills, supervisor used to verify facts to the effect that Shri Tiwari had worked for that month or not. He had placed copies of contracts entered into between the Corporation andthe Contractor as Ex . MW 3 /W1 and Ex. MW 3 /W2 , besides letters Ex . MW 3 /W3 to Ex . MW3 / W15, written for extension of contracts . Bills submitted bythe Contractor are placed over the record by him as Ex. MW3/W16 to Ex, MW 3 /W18 . Ex. MW3 /W20 and Ex . MW 3 /W21 are reports furnished by he Contractor to the parties.

14. During the course of appreciation of facts projected by the witnesses referred above, it came to light that the claimant sent a demand letter to the Corporation which is Ex . WW 1/1 . On perusal of the demand letter stand taken by the claimant had emerged over the record. Though the claimant projects in Ex. WW 1/1 that he was employed by the Corporation , yet he details therein that the Corporation had shown him as an employee of the Contractor and placed his services at the disposal ofthe Institute with ulterior motive . In claim statement Ex. WW 1/3, submitted before the Conciliation Officer, same facts were pleaded. Therefore, out of these two documents it came to light that the claimant presents that he was showri as an employee ofa contractor and his services were placed at the disposal ofthe Institute . Consequently, it is evident that in disguised words the claimant pleads that he was projected as an employee of the Contractor by the Corporation. It is implicit that in the demand letter and the claim statement filed before the Conciliation Officer claimant concedes that he was an employee of the Contractor, which modus operendi was adopted by the Corporation for ulterior purposes , This stand was discarded by the claimant when he filed his claim statement before the Tribunal and entered the witness box to testify facts . He projects in clear terms that he was an employee of the Corporation, under whom he worked from July, 1989 till 20-2-2005 . One may say that oscillating stand taken by the claimant proves detriment to his cause.

15. Muh emphasis has been laid by the claimant on documents Ex. MW 1 /W2 and Ex . MW 1 /W3 . For sake of convenience contents of Ex. MW1 /W2 are reproduced thus:

16. Ex. MW I /W2 projects that Dr. Kulwant Singh . certifies that claimant has been working as security guard and posted at the Institute located at Asiad Village, New Delhi , since September , 1989. This document nowhere specifies as to whose employee the claimant was . A simple declaration is there in that documents that the claimant was working as security guard and posted at the Institute. This document nowhere concludes that the claimant was an employee of the Corporation or the Institute . In Ex . MW 1 /W3 Dr. Kulwant Singh certifies that Shri Tiwari was performingduties of security guard in Corporation at212, Asiad Village, New Delhi . This document also does not speak about the employment of the claimant by the Corporation or the Institute . Contents of these two documents, if appreciated in the light of posts available with the Corporation , which are projected in Ex. MW 1/1 , would give true situation which Dr. Kulwant Singh unfolded therein . At the cost of repetition , it is highlighted that personnel of the Corporation has been classified into Executive-Non-Executive Groups . Executive groups consist of group A and group. B officers . Non- Executive Cadre consist ofgroupC and group D'employees wherein officials working in project cadre , management service cadre , general clerical cadre, official language cadre, secretarial service cadre and general service cadre fall . General Service cadre hasbeen sub-divided into skilled, semi -skilled and unskilled categories . In skilled category post ofdriver, electrician ; plumber, category and house keeping fall while liftman falls in semi -skilled category. In unskilled category post of chowkidar, sweeper, mali , general attendant , farash, dispatch rider, assist fero printer, daftry, fero printer, machine operator and mason have been enlisted. No post of security guard is there in general services cadre , hence it cantiot fall in group D categories. When no post of security guard was available with the Corporation. Dr. Kulwant Singh , who was working as Executive Director (Training) with the Institute cannot certify that the claimant was an employee of the Institute/Corporation . He was also well aware of agreement executed between the Corporation 640-

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ) and the Contractor , which is Ex. MW 1/2. In the light of these facts he issued certificates Ex. MW 1 /W2 and Ex . MW 1/W3 . Therefore, it is clear that these certificates Dr. Kulwant Singh nowhere proclaims that the claimant was working as security guard under the Corporation. When contents of these documents are read in between the lines, it crept over the record that Dr. Kulwant Singh announces that claimant was working as security guard in thepremises ofthe Corporation at 212 Asiad Village, New Delhi. He had not certified that the claimant was - an employee ofthe Corporation. Therefore, contents ofthese documents nowehere came to the rescue of the claimant. One will not conclude that these documents certify that the claimantwas an employee of the Corporation.

of the Institute , as an employee of the Contractor. The Contractor provided security guards to the Institute upto January, 2005. Thereafter M/ s . Pearl Security Services was engaged to provide sécurity guards . No security guard was employed by the Corporation or the Institute, since no such post exists . Contractor used to deposit contribution towards E.S.I. and Provident Fund. Ex . MW 1/6 is the copy of challan endorsed by the Contractor to the Institute . Ex . MW 1/7 is also copy of the challan so endorsedby the Contractor. Ex. MW 1/8 is the copy of the cheque released by the Institute in favour ofthe Contractor. Facts projected by Shri Dagar get reaffirmation through the deposition ofShri Mehta . He presents that Ex. MW 3 / 1 and Ex . MW 3/2 are copies of the scroll in respect of payment made by the Contractor to security guards . Therefore, out of facts detailed above it is crystal clear that the claimant was working as an employee of the Contractor, who deputed him to provide security services to the Institute.

17. In his testimony claimant concedes that no appointment letter was issued in his favour by the Corporation .According to him , no application for job was moved by him either to the Corporation or to the Institute . He also concedes that he was not got medically examined before givingjob to him : He opted not to explain as to how he reached the office ofthe Corporation to get employment. Shri Rajesh Mehta presents clinching facts , when he deposed that Ex . MW 3/3 is the copy of cheque alongwith receipt given by Shri Tiwari to the Contractor. When Ex . MW 3/3 was perused , it came to light that a sum of Rs . 7380/- was released in favour of the claimant by the Contractor on 5th of February, 2005. Claimant had issued a receipt inrespect of payment so made to him . Claimant had not explained as to under what circumstances this cheque was received by him . Therefore , these documents go to conclude that the claimant was receiving his wages from the Contractor in February, 2005..

20. Relationship of employer and employee is constituted by a contract , express or implied between employer and employee . A contract of service is one in which a person undertakes to serve another and to obey his reasonable orders within the scope of the duty undertaken . A contract ofemployment may be inferred from the conduct which goes to show that such a contract was intended although never expressed and when there has , in fact, been employment of the kind usually performed by the employees . Any such inference, however, is open to rebuttal as by showing that the relation between the parties concerned was on a charitable footing or the parties were relations or partners or were directors of a limited company which employed no staff. While the employee , at the time, whenhis services were engaged, need not have known the identity ofhis employer, there must have been some act or contract by which the parties recognized one another as master or servant .

18. Shri Mehta further projects that the claimant alongwith other security guards made a complaint to the Institute , which complaint was forwarded to the management . He proved that complaint as Ex . MW 3/4. On perusal of Ex . MW 3/4 one would conclude that it bears signatures of the claimant besides other security guards . In Ex. MW 3/4 cliamrant and other security guards made a complaintdated 23-2-2005 against the Contractor in respect of non payment of their salary for the month of January, 2005. As unfolded by Shri Mehta the said complaint was forwarded to the Conractor for needful . Contents of the complaint brings an admission of Shri Tiwari over the record to this effect that he was an employee of the Contractor. When a Contractor fails to make payment of wages to a contract employee , principal employer is under an obligation to make payment of his wages . Therefore , complaint Ex: MW 3/4 was rightly made to the Institute, which had forwarded it to the Contractor for action . These facts demolished the case projected by Shri. Tiwari that he was an employee of the Corporation .

21. No evidence worth name was brought over the record by the claimant to establish relationship ofemployer and employee between him and the Corporation . However, he places emphasis on Ex . MW 1 / W4 to Ex. MW 1 /W20 to project that he was being supervised by caretaker of the Institute . On perusal of these documents it is emerging that duties performed by security guards during night hours , were supervised by the caretaker of the Institute who used to submit a report to the Welfare Officer . These documents nowehere establishes that the claimants and others were assigned duties by the officials of the Institute. Their duties were being supervised as a caution , in order to see whether they were serious or casual in performance of duties . Such right is always available to the principal employer, to make a complaint to the Contractor in respect ofwork performed by a contract labour. These documents nowhere establish relationship of employer and employec between the parties . Consequently it is crystal clear that 19. Shri U.S. Dagar highlights that Shri Sadanand Tiwari hever applied for a job to the Corporation or the Institute .He was working as security guard at the premises [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

641 भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15,0011/पौष 25 , 1932

these documents cannot bring accolades to the claimant. Claimanthas miserably failed to establish relationship of employer and employee between the parties . The Corporation could establish that the claimant was an employee ofthe Contractor. Issue is , therefore , answered infavour of the Corporation and against the claimant .

Issue Nos. 2, 3 and 4

22. When claimant was an employee of the Contractor, in that situation there was no occasion.available to the Corporation to dispense with his services . As projected above, a new Contractor was awarded work of providing security services to the Corporation in February, 2005. At that juncture services of the claimant came to an end. The appropriate Government had made a reference forarticulation as to whether termination of services ofthe claimant by the Corporation w.e.f. 20-2-2005 was legal and justified. When there was no relationship of employer and employee between the Corporation and the claimant in that situation the terms of reference are uncalled for.

23. Whether this Tribunal can proceed to adjudicate the issue as to whether termination of the services of the claimant by the Contractor w.e.f. 20-2-2005 is legal and justified ? In relation to any industrial dispute concerning an industrial undertaking or establishment enumerated in clause( a)( i) ofsection 2 ofthe Act, the Central Government istheappropriate Government. For the sake ofconvenience provisions of clause (a)( i) of section 2 of the Act are extractedthus:

"(a) appropriate Government" means-

Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or the Life Insurance Corporation ofIndia established under section 3ofthe Life Instrance Corporation Act, 1956 (31 of 1956), or the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited registered under the Companies Act, 1956( 1 of 1956), or the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation established under section 3 of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corparation Act, 1961 (47 of 1961 ) , or the Central Warehousing Corporation established under section 3 of the Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 (58 of 1962 ), or the Unit Trust of India established under section 3 of the Unit Trust of IndiaAct, 1963 (52 of 1963), or the Food Corporation of India establishedunder section 3 , or a Board of Management established for two or more contiguous States under section 16, of the Food Corporations Act, 1964 (37 of 1964 ), or the Airports Authority of India constitued under section 3 of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 (55 of 1994), or a Regional Rural Bank established under section 3 of the Regional Rural Barks Act, 1976 (21 of1976), or the Export Credit and Guarantee Corporation Limited or the Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Limited, the National Housing Bank established, under section 3 of the National HousingBankAct, 1987 (53 of 1987) or an air transport service, or a banking or an insurance company, a mine , an off field, a Cantonment Board, or a major port , the Central Government and

(ii) in relation to any other industrial dispute , the State Government ; "

24. No evidence worth name came over the record that the claimant was an employee of the Corporation.or the Institute. As concluded above , he was an employee of the Contractor. Hence, question arises as to who shall be the appropriate Government for the present dispute Answer has been provided in clause (a)(ii ) of section 2 of theAct, which contemplates that in relation to any other industrial dispute the State Government is the appropriate Government. However, this Tribunal is not oblivious of the proposition that Union Territory ofDelhi-enjoins a special status under the Constitution. Delhi is a Union Territory having some special provisions with respect to its administration.Article 239 of the Constitution speaks that every union territory shall be administered by the Presidont acting to such extent as he thinks fit , through an administrator to be appointed by him with such designation... as he may specify. Article 239 AA makes special provisions with respect to Delhi , detailing therein that the Union (1) in relation to any industrial dispute concerning any industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government or by a railway company or concerning any such controlled industry as maybe specified in this behalfbythe Central Government or in relation to an industrial dispute concerning a Dock Labour Board established under section 5A of the Dock Workers ( Regulation of Employment) Act , 1948 ( 9 of 1948 ) , or the Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 ( 1 of 1956) or the Employees' State Insurance Corporation established under section 3 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) , or the Board ofTrustees constituted under section3A ofthe Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 (46 of 1948) , or the Central Board of Trustees and the State Boards of Trustees constituted under section 3A of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous ProvisionsAct, 1948 (46 of 1948), or the Central Board of Trustees and the State Boards of Trustees constituted under section 5A and section 5B, respectively, of the Employees '

3G1/11-40 642

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25, 1932

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] :

"The award was sought to be voided, inter alia , on the ground that by virtue of the Constitution and composition of the Corporation, Central Government was the only authority competent to make a reference of the dispute to the Industrial Court and that the reference by the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi was , therefore, in excess of power. Even otherwise no exception could be taken to the order of reference , even if it be assumed that Central Government was the appropriate Government, in asmuch as the distinction between the Central and the State Government in relation to the Union Territory in our constitutional framework is rendered illusory, Union Territory is administered by the President of India under Article 239 of the Constitution ofIndia, acting to such extent as he thinks fit . Therefore , the Administrator, to be appointed by him, in the case of Union territory, there is an amalgamation of the constitutional classification of legislative and executive powers between the Centre and the States . According to section 3 (60 ) of the General Clauses Act, the "Central Government" in relation to the Administration of Union Territory means the Administrator acting within the scope of authority given to him under Article 239 ofthe Constitution of India and in terms of section 3 (60) of the General Clauses Act , " State Government " as respects anything done or to be done in the Union Territory means the Central Government. In the case ofUnion Territory , therefore , the Central and State Governments merge and it is immaterial whether an order of reference is made by one or the other. This contention must, therefore , fail" .

Territory of Delhi shall be called the National Capital Territory of Delhi and the administrator thereof appointed in Article 239 shall be designated as the Lieutenant Governor. There shall be Legislative Assembly, and provisions ofArticles 324 to 327 and 329 shall apply in relation the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi as they apply in relation to a State . The LegislativeAssembly shall have power to make laws for thewhole or any part of the National Capital Territory with respect to the matters enumerated in the State List or the Concurrent List except the matters with respect to entries 1, 2 and 18 of the State List and entries 64, 65 and 66 ofthat list, in so for they relate to the said entries 1 , 2 and 18. The Council ofMinisters shall be headed by the Chief Minister toaid andadvise the Lt. Governor in exercise ofhis functions in relation of the matters with respect to which the Legislative Assembly has power to make laws. In case difference of opinion between Lt. Governor and his ministers or any matter, the Lt. Governor shall refer it to the President for decision and act according to the decision giventhereon by the President and pending such decision the Lt. Governor is competent to take action in urgent matters . The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the President and Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advise of the Chief Minister. Therefore , it is evident that though a Legislative Assembly is there in National Capital Territory of Delhi, yet it is a union territory administeredby the President through the Administrator appointed by him . In case ofdifference ofopinion between the Administrator and the Ministers , it is the decision of the President that prevails . Consequently the State Government merges with the Centre when Lt. Governor administer the Union Territory or in case of difference of opinion the President decides the issue.

27. Again in Mahavir [ 97(2002) DLT 922 ] the High

Courtwas confronted with the same proposition . Relying _the precedent in M.K. Jain ( supra) with profit it was ruled that reference made by the Government of NCT of Delhi was not bad despite the fact that appropriate Government was the Central Government. Difference of State Government and Central Government goes to the brink of abolition when State Government has been defined as the Central Government by clause (60) of section 3 of the General Clauses Act and Delhi is being administered by the President thorugh the Administrator appointed by him . Therefore , he aforesaid precedents make it clear that a status of union territory of Delhi can be termed as Central Government in certain matters . :

25. State Government has been defined the clause (60) of section 3 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, in respect ofanything done or to be done after commencement of the Constitution (7thAmendment) Act, 1956 in a case of State, the Govemor and in a Union Territory, the Central Government . Therefore , it is evident that for a Jnion Territory, no distinction has been made between the State and the Central Government . The President Administers the Union Territory, through an Administrator appointed byhim. In case of National Capital Territory ofDelhi , it is being administered by the President though the Lieutenant Governor. Though there is a legislative Assemb'y and Council ofMinisters , yet in case of difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and Council of Ministers , the decision ofthe President shall prevail, which fact make it clear that for the purpose ofadministration of the union territory, the Central and the State Government merges over certain matter.

26. High Court ofDelhi was confronted with such a proposition inM.K. Jain ( 1981 Lab . I.C. 62) wherein it was laidas follows:

28. Whether the Central Government can be termed as State Government for any purpose ? Article , 53 of the Constitution provides that the executive power of theUnion shall vest in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution. Article, 73 defines extent of executive power of the Centre , that is , on matters which shall be controlled and administered by the Central भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 15 , 2011 /पौष 25 , 1932

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

Executive . It has been detailed therein that the executive power of the union shall extend(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws and (b) to the exercise of such rights , authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement. The extent of the State's executive power is set out in Article , 161 of the Constitution . Administrative relations between the Union and the states is to be dealt in accordance with the provisions ofArticle 256,257,258,258A, 260 and 261 ofthe Constitution. Article 258A'was added by 7th Amendment Act, 1956 to make a matching provision to clause ( 1 ) of Article , 258 of the Constitution. While exercising powers contained in clause (1 ) ofArticle 258 , the President is empowered to entrust union functions to a State Government or its officers . There was no provisions enabling the Governor of a State to entrust state functions to the Central Government or its officers . That lacuna was found to be of practicable difficulty and provisions ofArticle, 258A were inserted in the Constitution . Thus it is evident that arena of union executive powers and the state executive powers are well defined.

29. Clause (8 ) of Section 3 of the General Clauses Act defines the Central Government in relation to administration of Union Territory, the Administrator thereof acting within the scope of authority given to him under Article , 239 of the Constitution . Therefore, it is evident that Administrator ofGovernment of N.C.T. Delhi has been defined to mean as Central Government to administer the UnionTerritory ofDelhi . Hence for the limited purposes , provided in the Constitution , executive functions of the Central Government can be entrusted to Government of a State or its Officers . The Central Government would not be termed as the State Government, when those functions are being executedby the State Government or its officers . So executive power of the Union can be exercised, in certain matters by the State Government or its officers but in that situation too the Central Government would not be termed as the State Government. The special provisions referred abovewould not make the reference , made by the Central Government as the reference made by Government ofN.C.T. ofDelhi .

30. There is other facet of the coin . This Tribunal was constituted vide Notification No.A- 11020/33 /75 -CLT dated 30-9-76. It was provided in the notification that the Tribunal has been constituted under the powers provided in Sub-section ( 1 ) of Sub-section (2 ) of Section 7- A ofthe Act,with its head quarter at New Delhi . Another notification was issued on that very date empowering the Tribunal to adjudicate applications moved in Sub- section(2) ofSection 33-C oftheAct, in relation to the workman employed in any ' industry' in the Union Territory of Delhi, in respect of which the Central Government is the appropriate Government. Therefore , the Tribunal has been empowered to adjudicate industrial disputes, in respect ofwhich

643 Central Government is the appropriate Government . As pointed out above, the appropriate Government in this case is the State Government . Under these circumstances this Tribunal cannot entertain the present dispute for adjudication , in respect ofwhich appropriate Government 'is the State Government.

31.Since this Tribunal cannot invoke its jurisdiction to adjudicate the reference, hence the Tribunal refrains its hands from entering into the merits ofthe matter. The Central Government was not competent to make a reference of this dispute to this Tribunal . The parties should seek redressal atthe appropriate forum . With these observations an award is passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

Dated:25-10-2010.

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम्बर , 2010

का. आ. 185.-मैसर्स अग्रवाल हाडजेगर वर्कस एंव फाउंड्रीज (प्रा. ) लिमिटेड ( चैन्नेई क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या डब्ल्यूबी/167 के अंति (इसमें इसके उपरांत स्थापना के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का १५ (इसमें इसके उपरांत अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) को धारा 17( 1 ) (क) के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार द्वारा प्रदान की गईछूट को रद्द करने के लिए आवेदन किया है।

2. उपर्युक्त स्थापना को कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 की धारा 17 ( 1 ) ( क ) के अंतर्गत, -01-11-1952 से छूट प्रदान करते हुए दिनांक 07-12-1962 को एक आदेश जारी किया गया था । !

3. अब भारत सरकार के ध्यान में ये बात आई है कि लक्त स्थापना ने 01-08-2010 से अपनी छूट अभ्यर्पित कर दी है तथा यह आगे कोई कार्यकलाप नहीं कर रही है ।

4. अतः , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए कन्द्रीय सरकार उपर्युक्त स्थापना को प्रदान की गई छूट को एतद्‌द्वारा 01-08-2010 से रह करती है ।

[सं. एस-35017/21/2010- एस.एस.- H] एस. डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the30th November, 2010 S.O. 185.-Whereas M/s .Agarwal HardwareWorks &Foundries (P) Limited funder Code No. WB/ 167 Chennai region! (hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied for cancellation of exemption granted by Government of India under Section 17( 1 )(a) ofthe EPF & MP Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

644

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15 , 2011 /PAUSA 25 , 1932

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2010 2.Whereas a Order dated 07-12-1962 granting exemption w.e.f. 01-11-1952 under Section 17(1 )( a) of the EPF & MP Act , 1952 to the said establishment.

3. And whereas now it has come to the notice to the Government that the establishment has surrendered its exemption with effect from the 01-08-2010 and it is no longer carrying on any activity.

..का. आ. 187. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 、 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

4. Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 17 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby cancels the exemption granted to the said establishment with effect from the 01-08-2010 .

[No. S- 35017/21 /2010-SS . II ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2010

" आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के रंगारेड्‌डी जिले के शामीरपेट मण्डल के तुमुकुंटा, मंदायपल्ली, पोतायपल्ली , अंतायपल्ली, बोम्मर्सपेट , उप्परपल्ली ( शामीरपेट राजस्व गांव ) , बाबागुड़ा (शामीरपेट राजस्व गांव ) जवाहर नगर ( बिट्सपिलानी ) और सिंगायपल्ली राजस्व गांव के सीमा के अंतर्गत स्थित सभी क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस-38013/54/2010- एसएस -1 | एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010 का. आ. 186.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियंत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा-16 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

" आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के नलगीण्डा जिले के मेल्लचेरुवु मण्डल के मेल्लचेरुवु, रामापुरम् तथा मेल्लचेरुवु मण्डल के चिन्तपालेम् राजस्व गांव के सीमा के अंतर्गत स्थित सभी क्षेत्र । "

S.O. 187.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter - Vand VI [except sub- section- ( 1 ) ofSection 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely [सं. एस-38013/53/2010-एसएस-1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2010

"All the areas falling within the limits of Revenue villages of Thumukunta, Mandaipally, Pothaipally, Anthaipally, Bommaraspet , Upperpally (Shameerpet Revenue Village) , Babaguda (Shameerpet Revenue Village), Jawahar Nagar (Bitspilani ) and Singaipally ofShameerpet Mandal in Ranga Reddy District of Andhra Pradesh . "

[No.S-38013/54/2010 - S.S . [ ] S.D, XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2010 S.O. 186.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st January, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 whichhave already been brought into force) and Chapter- VandVI (except sub-Section ) ( 1 ) ofSection 76 and Sections 77,78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofAndhra Pradesh namely:

"All the areas falling within the limits of Revenue villages of Mellacheruvu, Ramapuram and Chinthapalem of Mellacheruvu Mandal in Nalgonda District ofAndhra Pradesh. "

का. आ. 188.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 जनवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा-76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

[No. S-38013/53 /2010 -S.S . I] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

645 [भाग II--खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011 / पौष 25, 1932)

में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठाम को उक्त योवना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-03-1991 से अगली सूनापना के लिए एट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं एस-35015/31/2010-एसएस-11 ] एस डी. जेविका, अवर सचिव " आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के विजयनगरम जिले के पूसपाटिरेगा मण्डल के जी. चोडवरम् (छोड़ा गांव पौरम को मिलाकर ) , चोडम्मा अग्रहारम्, कोव्वाडा कंदिवलसा ( छोटे गांव नक्कनिपेटा , भादवय्यपेटा, बोड्‌डू‌वानिकल्लालु ) तथा कनिमल्ला (छोटा गांव कामवरम को मिलाकर) राजस्व गांव के सीमा के अंतर्गत स्थित सभी क्षेत्र ।"

NewDelhi, the29th December, 2010 [सं. एस-38013/55/2010-एसएस-1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 24th December, 2010

SO. 189. Whereas M/s. ITD Cementation India Limited [ under Code No. MH/20241 in Bandra Region ] (hereinafter referred to as the establishowst) hast) has applied for exemption under claclause ( 3) ofsub-acotion ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees'Provident Funds and Miscellaneous ProvisionsAct, 1952 ( 19 of 1952 ) ( hereinafter refered to as theAct).

S.O. 188.-In exercise of the powers conferred bry sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appointsthe 1st Januayr, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapters- Vand VI [except sub- section-( 1 ) of Section76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofAndhra Pradesh namely :

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident food of the said establishment with respect to the rates ofcontribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident find benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme , 1952 (hereinafter refered to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar charmoter

"All the areas falling within the Revenue Villages ofG. Chodavaram ( Including Hamlet viz . , Poram) Chodamma Agraharam, Kovvada, Kandivalasa (including Hamlets viz . , Nakkanipetą, Madavayyapeta , Boduvanikallalu and Kanimala (including Hamlet viz. , Kamavaram) ofPusapatirega Mandal of Vizianagaram District of Andhra Pradesh . "

[No.S-38013/55/2010-S.S . I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

3. Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time, the Central Government, hereby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 01-03-1991 until further notification .

नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर , 2010

[No. S-35015/31/2010- SS, 11] S.D. XAVIER, Under Socy.

नई दिल्ली , 29 दिसम्बर , 2010 का. आ. 189.-जबकि मैसर्स आईटीडी सीमेंटेंशन इंडिया लिमिटेड [ बांद्रा क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या एमएच/20241 के अंतर्गत (एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठानं के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि.. और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 को 19 ) ( एतदुपरात अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है ।

का. आ. 190.-जबकि मैसर्स गुजरात हैवी केमिकल लिमिटेड [गुजरात क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या बीजे/ 19861 के अंतर्गत (एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मधारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ).( एसदुपरांत अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन किया है । 2. और जबकि , केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं है और कर्मचारी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं ।

2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विकार में घर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियमाने कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट फिल्मों की तुलना मेंकम हितकर नहीं है और कर्मचारी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना, 1952 ( वदुमचत्त योजना के कप में संदर्षित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. केन्द्र सरकार एत्तद्‌द्वारा , अब उक्तः अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय- समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्याम 646

[PART II-SBC. 3(ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

और उकल, हसनपर्ती मण्डल में मुच्चेर्ला और येल्लापुर , राजस्व गांव के सीमा के अंतर्गत स्थित सभी क्षेत्र । "

[सं एस-38013/04/2011 - एसएस-1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 6th January, 2011 केन्द्र सरकार एक्र्युद्वारा , अब कमत अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट रातों को ध्यात में रखते हुए, उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-02-1991 से अगली अभिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/29/2010- एस एस- II ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 29thDecember, 2010

S.O. 191.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government herebyappoints the 1st February, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( excet Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapters- Vand VI [except Sub- section ( 1 ) ofSection 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely :

S.O. 190.-Whereas M/s . Gujarat HeavyChemical Limited [under Code No. GJ /19861 in Gujarat Region] (hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption under clause (a) of Sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection 17 ofthe Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous ProvisionsAct, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as theAct).

"All the areas falling within the Revenue Villages of Thimmapur Haveli and Gopalpur of Hanamkonda Mandal, Geesugonda and Ookal of Geesugonda Mandal and Mucherla and Yellapur of Hasanpathy Mandal in Warangal District of Andhra Pradesh.

[No. S-38013/04/2011 -SS I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2011

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other Provident Fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment ofsimilar character .

3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) ofSub- section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from timeto time, the Central Government, hereby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 01-02-1991 until further notification.

का. आ. 192.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है । के उपबंध केरल राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

[No. S-35015/29/2010-SS. IIJ S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

"जिला इडुक्की के तोडुपुषा तालुक में मुटटम राजस्व गांव के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2011

[सं. एस-38013/03 /2011 - एस.एस. - 1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 6th January, 2011 का. आ. 191.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 घारा के सिलीये जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा-76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी हैं ] ' के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

S.O. 192. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 whichhave already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI (except Sub-section) ( 1) ofSection 76 and Sections 77 , 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Kerala namely:

" आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के वरंगल जिले के हनमकोण्डा मण्डल में तिम्पापुर हवेली और गोपालपुर, गीसुगोण्डामण्डल,में गीसुगोण्डा [ भाग II-खंड (ii) ]

647

भारत का राजपत्र: जनवरी 15, 2011 /पौष 25, 1932

"The areas within the Revenue Village ofMuttom in Thodupuzha Taluk of Idukki District. "

[No. S-38013/03/2011 -S.S.I] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy:

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2011

का. आ. 193.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 घारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6.( धारा 76 की उप- धारा (1 ) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

" आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के श्रीकाकुलम् जिले के श्रीकाकुलम नगर के सीमा में स्थित सभी राजस्व गांव तथा श्रीकाकुलम मण्डल केसिंगुपुरम, पेद्द‌पाछु , कुसेलपुरम, केशवरावपेटा राजस्व गांव तथा श्रीकाकुलम् जिले के गारा मण्डल के अच्वन्नापालेम । "

لا

[सं. एस-38013/02/2011 - एसएस-1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 6th January, 2011

S.O. 193.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (3 ) of Sectionl of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( excet Sections 44 and45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- VandVI (except Sub -section) ( 1) ofSection76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe saidAct shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofAndhra Pradesh namely:

"All the areas falling within the limits of Srikakulam Town and the Revenue Villages of Singupuram, Peddapadu , Kuselapuram , Kesavaraopeta of Srikakulam Mandal and Atchannepalem ofGara Mandal in Srikakulam District of Andhra Pradesh. "

[No. S-38013/02/2011 -SS I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 6 जनवरी , 2011

का. आ. 194. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप- धारो (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2011 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6. [ धारा 76 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध पंजाब राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्

तहसील व मिला क्रमांक राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

1 2

1. जस्सर

लुधियाना

2 पद्दी

सुक्षिकमा

लुधियाना

3. भगवानपुर

लुधियाना

4. डुगरी

5. टिब्बा

लुधियाना

6. उमेदपुर

7. धरौड

लुधियाना

8. लाडूवाल

9.आलोवाल

लुधियाना

10. मानेवाल

लुधियाना

11 बोकर-डोगरा

लुधियाना

12. नूरपुर बेट

13. नूरवाला

लुधियाना

14. पहारूवाल

लुधियाना

15. लायें दाना

लुधियाना

16. कटानी कलां

17. लाटों जोगा

18. पंगलियों

सुचिकना

19. कुंमकर्ता

सुधियाला

20. भामा कलां

लुधियाना

21. कुम्बा

लुधियाना

22. लक्खोवाल

[सं एस-38013/01/2811 - एसएस -1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर, अपर सचिव NewDelhi, the 6th January, 2011 .

S.O. 194.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3) of Sectionl of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government herebyappoints the 1st February, 2011 as the date onwhich the provisions of Chapter - IV (excet Sections 44 and45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- VandVI (except Sub-Section) ( 1 ) ofSection 76and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe saidAct shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofPunjab namely:

Tehsil & Dist St. Name oftheVillage

No.

1 2

Ludhiana

1. Jassar

2.Paddi

Ludhiana 648

3 1

Ludhiana 3. Bhagwanpura

Ludhiana 4. Dugri

Ludhiana 5. Tibba

Ludhiana 6. Umexipur

Ludhiana 7. Dharour

Ludhiana 8. Lauduwal

Ludhiana 9. Allowal

Ludhiana 10. Manewal

Ludhiana 11. Bonker-Dogran

Ludhiana 12. NurpurBet

Ludhiana 13. Nurwala

Ludhiana 14. Pahruwal

Ludhiana 15. LatonDana

Ludhiana 16. Katani Kalan

Ludhiana 17. Laton Joga

Ludhiana 18. Panglian

Ludhiana 19. Kum Kalan

Ludhiana 20. Bhama Kalan

Ludhiana 21. Kubba

Ludhiana 22. Lakhowal

[No. 8-38013/01 /2011 -S.S. I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 6 जनवरी , 2011 का. आ. 198.- कर्मचारी रामचीन अधिनियम, 1948 (1948

का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उम ( 3 ) तों का प्रयोग करते

हुए, बोन्द्रीन सरकार एक्काय फरवरी, 2011 को कस तारीखा के रूप नियत करती है, जिसको उपाधिनियम के अध्य -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6 में [धारा76 की उप- धारा ( 1) और धाय 77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रकृत की जा चुकी है। के उपबंध हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रकृत होंगे , अर्थात्:

राजस्व भाग

जिला क्रम

हदबस्त संख्या

1 2

156.

फरीदाबाद 1. कावरा

143

फरीदाबाद 2. भुपानी

137

फरीदाबाद 3. वजीरपुर

फरीदाबाद

124

4. बुदैना

155

फरीदाबाद 5. नचौली

फरीदाबाद

138

6. पलंकाली

169/170 फरीदाबाद 7.कबुलपुर

110

फरीदाबाद 8.जासना

204

9. मोहना

फरीदाबाद

113

फरीदाबाद 10.खेरीकला

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 15, 2011 /PAUSA25 , 1932

202

फरीदाबाद 11. छायसा

फरीदाबाद 12. फरीदपुर

115

फरीदाबाद 13. बथोला

116

फरीदाबाद 14. बरोली

187

फरीदाबाद 15. चांदपुर

पलवल

16. औरंगाबाद

पलवल

17. रेहराना

[सं. एस-38013/05/2011 - एसएस-1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 6th January, 2011

S.O. 195.-In'exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2011 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV (except Sections 44 and45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- Vand VI (except Sub- section) ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force)ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely :

District Sl. RevenueVillage No.

Had. Bast. No.

Faridabad

156

1. Kanwra

143

Faridabad 2.Bhupani

Faridabad

137

3.Wazirpur

Faridabad

124

4. Budaina

155

Faridabad 5. Nachauli

Faridabad

138

6. Palwali

169/170

Faridabad 7. Kabulpur

Faridabad

110

8. Jasanaa

Faridabad

204

9. Mohna

Faridabad

113

10: Kheri Kalan

202

Faridabad 11. Chhainsa

Faridabad 12. Faridpur

115

Faridabad 13. Bathola

Faridabad

116

14. Baroli

Faridabad

187

15. Chandpur

Palwal- 16. Aurangabad

Palwal

17. Rehrana

[No. S-38013/05/2011 -S.S . 1 ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road , Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 , 2011