This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007 /2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04 /0007 / 2003-05

जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, अप्रैल10 अप्रैल 16 , 2011 , शनिवार/चैत्र 20 चैत्र 26, 1933

सं. 16]

NEW DELHI , APRIL 10- APRIL 16, 2011 , SATURDAY/CHAITRA 20-CHAITRA 26, 1933

No. 16]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II -खण्ड 3 -उप- खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section (ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए संविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

6. कार्यालय पुलिस उप महानिरिक्षक ( चिकित्सा ) , संयुक्त अस्पताल , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , गांधीनगर

गृह मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 8 अप्रैल , 2011

7. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 196 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ।

8. कार्यालय स्पेशल महानिदेशक , पूर्वोत्तर अंचल , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, गुवाहाटी , असम ।

कार्यालय पुलिस महानिरीक्षक , कोबरा सेक्टर केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , नई दिल्ली । 9:

का.आ. 1008.-केंद्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4) के अनुसरण में, गृह मंत्रालय के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों में हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान रखने वाले कर्मचारियों की संख्या 80 % से अधिक हो जाने के फलस्वरूप उन्हें एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती हैं:-

10. कार्यालय कमांडेंट, 201 कोबरा बटालियन ।

केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल

11 . कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 203 कोबरा बटालियन ।

12. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 204 कोबरा बटालियन ।

1. कार्यालय स्पेशल महानिदेशक, मध्य अंचल ( सेंट्रल जोन ) , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल ।

13. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 205 कोबरा बटालियन ।

2. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 197 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ।

14. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 206 कोबरा बटालियन ।

3. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 198 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ।

केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल

4. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 199 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ।

केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई, एन.टी.पी.सी./टी.वी.एच. पी.पी. जोशीमठ ( उत्तराखण्ड) तपोवन

5. कार्यालय कमांडेंट , 200 बटालियन , केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल ।

(2989)

1217 G1 /2011 2990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

2 केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई, एनटीपीसी लोहारी नागपाला, जोशीमठ, उत्तराखंड

केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई , वाराणासी एयरपोर्ट ( ला. ब.शा. ) , वाराणसी ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) 3.

केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई, वड़ोदरा एयरपोर्ट, वड़ोदरा , (गुजरात) 4.

5. केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई , वी.आई.ए.एल. बंगलोर, कर्नाटक

6. केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई, ए. एस. जी. त्रिवेन्द्रम एयरपोर्ट, त्रिवेन्द्रम ( केरल)

7. केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई, इलेक्ट्रोनिक निकेतन, नईदिल्ली

8 केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई, एस.एस.जी. नोएडा (उ.प्र. ) 9. केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई , ए.एस.जी. अगरतल्ला, त्रिपुरा

10. केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक सुरक्षा बल इकाई , विरल पदार्थ परियोजना , मैसूर ( कर्नाटक)

भारत-तिब्बत सीमा पुलिस बल

1. कार्यालय महानिरीक्षक ( स्पेशल फ्रंटियर ) , दिल्ली 2. क्षेत्रीय मुख्यालय ( दिल्ली)

3. क्षेत्रीय मुख्यालय ( लखनऊ)

4. क्षेत्रीय मुख्यालय ( भुवनेश्वर)

15. 28वींवाहिनी

6. 29वीं वाहिनी , अमृतसर

7. 32वींवाहिनी , कानपुर

8. 38वीं वाहिनी , रायपुर

9. 40वीं वाहिनी , रांची

10. 42वीं वाहिनी, करेरा

11. 45वीं वाहिनी

12. कार्यालय महानिरीक्षक ( प्रशि.परिक्षेत्र ) , मसूरी

13. कार्यालय महानिरीक्षक फ्रंटियर मुख्यालय ( उत्तर- पश्चिम ) चंडीगढ़

14. क्षेत्रीय मुख्यालय ( अमृतसर )

15. 26वीं वाहिनी , लुधियाना

16. 37वीं वाहिनी, पंचकुला ( हरियाणा )

17. 43वीं वाहिनी , पटियाला

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 18. क्षेत्रीय मुख्यलाय (तेजपुर )

19. 31 वीं वाहिनी, पापुम्परे (अ.प्र. )

20. 33वीं वाहिनी , खेलगाँव ( गुवाहाटी)

21. 39वीं वाहिनी , वैस्टसियांग ( अ.प्र. )

22. क्षेत्रीय मुख्यालय ( अल्मोड़ा)

23. 30वीं वाहिनी , महिडाण्डा

24. 34वीं वाहिनी , बरेली

25. 35वीं वाहिनी , अल्मोड़ा

26. 36वीं वाहिनी , भुवनेश्वर

27. 41 वीं वाहिनी , भुवनेश्वर

28. 44वीं वाहिनी , बेलगांव , कर्नाटक

[सं. 12017/1 /2008- हिन्दी]

अवधेश कुमार मिश्र , निदेशक (राजभाषा) MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS New Delhi , the 8thApril , 2011

S. O. 1008. In exercise of sub rule (4) of Rule 1,0 oftheOfficial Languages (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following officers of the Ministry of Home Affairs where the percentage of Hindi knowing staff has gone above 80% :-

CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE

1. Office of Special DG, Central Zone , Central Reserve Police Force , Kolkata, West Bengal .

2. Office of Commandant , 197 Bn . Central Reserve Police Force.

Office of Commandant, 198 Bn . Central Reserve Police Force. 3.

Office of Commandant, 199 Bn . Central Reserve PoliceForce. 4.

5. Office of Commandant, 200 Bn . Central Reserve PoliceForce..

6. Office ofDy. Inspector General (Medical), Composite Hospital, Central Reserve Police Force, Gandhinager.

7. Office ofthe Commandant, 196 Bn . , Central Reserve Police Force

8. Office of Special DG, North East Zone , Central Reserve Police Force , Guwahati , Assam.

9. Office of IGP, Cobra Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi .

10. Office of Commandant , 201 Cobra Bn .

11. Office of Commandant, 203 Cobra Bn .

2991 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल16, 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

19. 31st Bn . , Papumpare (A.P. )

12. Office ofCommandant, 204 Cobra Bn .

20. 33rd Bn. , Khelgaon (Guwahati)

13. Office ofCommandant, 205 CobraBn.

21. 39th Bn. , Westsiyang (A.P. )

14. Office ofCommandant, 206 Cobra Bn .

22. Sector Hqr . (Almora)

CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE

23. 30th Bn . , Mahidanda

24. 34th Bn. , Bareilly

1. Central Industrial Security Force Unit NTPC/TVHPP, Joshimatth, Tapovan Uttarakhnad.

25. 35th Bn. , Almora

2. Central Industrial Security Force Unit NTPC Lohari Nagpala, Joshimatth, Uttarakhand.

26. 36th Bn . , Bhuvaneshwar

27. 41st Bn. , Bhuvaneshwar

3. Central Industrial Security Force Unit Varanasi Airport (L.B.S. ) , Varanasi , U.P.

28. 44 Bn. , Belgaon, Karnataka

[No. 12017/1/2008-Hindi] 4. Central Industrial Security Force Unit Vadodara Airport, Vadodara, Gujarat,

AVADHESH KUMAR MISHRA, Director (OL) .

कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय 5. Central Industrial Security Force Unit VIAL Bangalore, Karnataka .

(कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल , 2011

6. Central Industrial Security Force Unit ASG Trivendrum Airport , Trivendrum, Kerala .

7. Central Industrial Security Force Unit Electronic Niketan , New Delhi .

8. Central Industrial Security Force Unit SSG Noida, U.P.

9. Central Industrial Security Force Unit ASG, Agartalla Airport, Tripura.

10. Central Industrial Security Force Unit Rare Material Project, Mysore , Karnataka .

INDO - TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE

Officeof Inspector General (Spl . Ftr. ) , Delhi 1.

Sector Hqr. (Delhi ) 2.

3. Sector Hqr. (Lucknow)

4. Sector Hqr (Bhuvaneshwar)

5. 28th Bn.

6. 29th Bn . Amritsar

7. 32ndBn . Kanpur

का.आ. 1009.-केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए महाराष्ट्र राज्य सरकार , गृह विभाग , मंत्रालय , मुम्बई की दिनांक 3 फरवरी , 2011 की अधिसूचना सं. सी.आई.डी. 2011/सी.आर. 106/पोल -11 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से हमले तथा श्री यशवंत सोनवाने , अपर आयुक्त, नासिक में पानेवाडी, मनमाड की हत्या के संबंध में पुलिस स्टेशन मनमाड सिटी में पंजीकृत भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 (1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 302, 353, 143 , 147 , 148 और 149 के अंतर्गत केस सं. 16/2011 के संबंध में तथा उपयुक्त उल्लिखित अपराधों के संबंध में प्रयास और षडयंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के क्रम में या उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध या अपराधों के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार समस्त महाराष्ट्र राज्य के संबंध में करती है ।

8. 38thBn. Raipur

[सं. 228/ 12/2011 - एवीडी- II ] 9. 40thBn . Ranchi

10 . 42nd Bn . Karera

वी.एम. रत्नम, उप सचिव 11. 45th Bn.

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

12. Office of Inspector General (Training Zone ) , Mussoorie

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi , the 8th April , 2011

13. Office of Inspector General Ftr . Hqrs . (North -West), Chandigarh

14. Sector Hqr. (Amritsar)

15. 26th Bn . Ludhiana

16. 37th Bn . Panchkula (Haryana)

17. 43rd Bn. , Patiala

S. O. 1009.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Government with the consent ofthe State Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai vide Notification No. CID-2011/CR- 106/POL - 11 dated 3rd February, 2011 , hereby extends the 18. Sector Hqr. (Tejpur) 2992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

(ख ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

powers andjurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Polic Establishment to the whole of the State Maharashra for investigation ofCase No. 11-2011 under Sections 302, 253, 143 , 148 , and 149 ofthe Indian Penal Code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) registered at Police Station Manmad City, Manmad relating to assault and murder of Sh . Yashwant Sonaware , Additional Commissioner , Nashik at Panewade , Manmad and attempt , abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offences and any other offence or offences committed in course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228 / 12/2011 - AVD- II ]

V. M. RATHNAM, Dy. Secy.

( इ ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्व विभाग)

[अधिसूचना सं. 17/2011/फा.सं. 203/ 16/2009-आ.क.नि- II ]

अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि.- II ) ( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली, 1 अप्रैल , 2011

MINSTIRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi , the 1st April , 2011 का.आ. 1010.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2003 से 31-3-2008 तक संगठन भौतिक अनुसंधान प्रयोगशाला , अहमदाबाद को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थात्ः-

S.O. 1010. It is hereby notified for general informations that the organization Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad , has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub -section (1) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (saidAct ), read with rules SC and 5D of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2008 in the category of ' scientific research association ' subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i ) अनुमोदित ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संस्था ' का एकमात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य स्वयं करेगा;

(i) The sole objective of the approved ' scientific research association ' shall be to undertake scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research activity by itself;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन खाता बही रखेगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित एक लेखाकार से उस खाता - बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of Section 139 of the said Act ;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

( iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amount applied for scientific research and a copy ofsuch statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

(क ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval iftheapproved organization:-- 2993

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph (iii) of parapraph 1; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub-paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph (iv) of paragraph 1; or

द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात , एतद्वारा , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के उप प्रबंध निदेशक , श्री प्रतीप चौधरी ( जन्म तिथि 12-9-1953 ) को उनके द्वारा पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30 सितम्बर, 2013 तक अर्थात उनके अधिवर्षिता की आयु प्राप्त करने की तारीख तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , 80,000 रुपए ( नियत ) के वेतनमान में अध्यक्ष , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के तौर पर नियुक्त करती है ।

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine;or

[फा.सं. 8/ 1/2006- बीओ-1 ] समीर के. सिन्हा , निदेशक

NewDelhi, the 7th April , 2011

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act and with rules 5C and 5D of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 17/2011/F.No . 203 / 16/2009/ITA- II ] AJAY GOYAL, Director /ITA - II )]

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) ' नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल , 2011

S.O. 1012. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of Section 19 and sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 20 ofthe StateBank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri Pratip Chaudhari (DoB: 12-9-1953), Deputy Managing Director, State Bank ofIndia, asChairman , State Bank of India in the pay scale of Rs . 80,000 ( fixed) with effect from the date of his taking charge of the post and upto 30-9-2013 i.e. the date of his attaining the age of superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 8/ 1 /2006-BO-I ] SAMIR K. SINHA, Director

नई दिल्ली , 7 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1011.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध )स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्री हिरन्या बोरा ( जन्म तिथि 24-12-1946) को अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , यूनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 6/19/2010 -बीओ-1 ] समीर के. सिन्हा , निदेशक

(Department of Financial Services) New Delhi, the 5th April , 2011

का.आ. 1013.-भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम, 1955 ( 1955 का23 ) की धारा 19 के खण्ड ( क ) और धारा 20 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात , एतद्वारा , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के उप प्रबंध निदेशक , श्री हेमंत जी. कांट्रेक्टर ( जन्म तिथि 22-4-1954) को उनके द्वारा पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30 अप्रैल , 2014 तक अर्थात उनके अधिवर्षिता की आयु प्राप्त करने की तारीख तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो, 75,500-80,000 रुपए के वेतनमान में प्रबंध निदेशक, भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के तौर पर नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा.सं. 8/1/2006- बीओ- II ] समीर के. सिन्हा , निदेशक

New Delhi , the 7th April, 2011 S.O. 1011.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section 3 (h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings )Act , 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provision) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Hiranya Bora (DoB : 24-12-1946) as part-time non -official director on the Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years from the date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 6/19/2010-BO -I ]

SAMIR K. SINHA , Director

नई दिल्ली , 7 अप्रैल , 2011

S.O. 1013. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause(b) ofSection 19 and sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 20 ofthe State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri Hemant G. Contractor (DoB: 22-4-1954) , presently Deputy Managing Director , State का.आ. 1012.-भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम, 1955 ( 1955 का23 ) की धारा 19 के खण्ड ( क ) और धारा 20 की उपधारा ( 1 ) 2994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

75,500-80,000 के वेतनमान में प्रबंध निदेशक , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के तौर पर नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा.सं. 8/1/2006-बीओ- I (iii) ] Bank of India , as Managing Director, State Bank of India in the pay scale of Rs . 75,500-80,000 with effect from the date of his taking over charge of the post and upto 30-4-2014 i.e. the date of his attaining the age of superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

समीर के. सिन्हा, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 7th April , 2011 [F.No. 8/ 1 /2006-BO- I ( i ) ] SAMIR K. SINHA, Director नई दिल्ली, 7 अप्रैल , 2011

S.O. 1015- In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (b) of Section 19 and sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 20 ofthe StateBank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955 ) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri A. Krishna Kumar (DoB: 18-11-1954 ) , presently Deputy Managing Director , State Bank of India, as Managing Director , State Bank of India inthe pay scale of Rs . 75,500-80,000 with effect from the date of his taking over charge of the post and upto 30-11-2014 i.e. the date of his attaining the age of superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 8/1 /2006 -BO- 1 (iii )] SAMIR K. SINHA , Director का.आ. 1014.- भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम, 1955 ( 1955 का 23 ) की धारा 19 के खण्ड ( ख ) और धारा 20 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात , एतद्वारा , श्री दिवाकर गुप्ता (जन्म तिथि 25-7-1953 ) , जो वर्तमान में भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के उप प्रबंधक निदेशक हैं , को 75,500-80,000 रुपए के वेतनमान में पद का कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से और 31-7-2013 तक यानि वह तारीख जिस दिन वह अधिवर्षिता की आयु प्राप्त कर लेंगे अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , प्रबंध निदेशक , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के तौर पर नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा.सं. 8/ 1/2006-बीओ -1 (ii) ] समीर के. सिन्हा , निदेशक

स्वास्थ्य तथा परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ( स्वास्थ्यतथा परिवार कल्याण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल , 2011

New Delhi , the 7th April , 2011

का.आ. 1016.-केन्द्र सरकार , दंतक चिकित्सा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करके, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है नामतः-

2. उत्कल विश्वविद्यालय , भुवनेश्वर विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की जा रही दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों की मान्यता के बारे में दंत चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 36 के कॉलम 2 तथा 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियोंको उसके अंतर्गत अंतर्विष्ट किया जाएगा , नामतः- S.O. 1014. - In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) ofSection 19 and sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 20 ofthe StateBank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri Diwakar Gupta (DoB: 25-07-1953 ) , presently Deputy Managing Director, State Bank of India, as Managing Director, State Bank of India inthe pay scale of Rs . 75,500-80,000 with effect from the date of his taking over charge of the post and upto 31-7-2013 i.e. the date of his attaining the age of superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

" III हाई टेक दंत चिकित्सा कालेज , भुवनेश्वर

[F.No. 8/1 /2006-BOI (ii) ]

SAMIR K. SINHA , Director नई दिल्ली, 7 अप्रैल , 2011

( i ) दंत चिकित्सा सर्जरी में बैचलर (यदि दिनांक 21-10-2010 को अथवा उसके पश्चात प्रदान की गई )

बीडीएस , उत्कल विश्वविद्यालय"

[फा. सं. वी.12017/53/2003 -डीई ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 5th April , 2011

का. आ. 1015.-भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम, 1955 ( 1955 का 23) की धारा 19 के खण्ड ( ख ) और धारा 20 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात , एतद्वारा , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के उप प्रबंधक निदेशक, श्री ए.कृष्ण कुमार ( जन्म तिथि 18-11-1954 ) को उनके द्वारा पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30 नवम्बर , 2014 तक अर्थात उनके अधिवर्षिता की आयु प्राप्त कर करने की तारीख तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो ,

S.O. 1016. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948 ), the Central Government , after consultation 2995 भारत का राजपत्र :

अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery

(ifgranted on or after 19-10-2010) BDS, Utkal University"

[F.No. V- 12017/32/2004- DE (Vol.I) ] with the Dental Council of India , hereby, makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi , the 5th April , 2011

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 36 , in Part - I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition ofdentaldegrees awarded by Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder:-

" III . Hi Tech Dental College , Bhubaneswar.

(i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 21-10-2010) BDS , Utkal University "

[F.No. V- 12017/53/2003 -DE]

ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

S.O. 1018. In continuation to this Department's Notification No. U- 12012/25 /2009 - ME (P - II ) Vol . I dated 27-7-2009 . and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of the Section -11 ofthe Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

नई दिल्ली , 5 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1017.-केन्द्र सरकार, दंतक चिकित्सा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करके , एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है नामत :--

"against " MGM University of Health Sciences (Deemed University) " , under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' (column 3 ) , the DGO qualification shall be added as a recognised medical qualification when granted by MGM University of Health Sciences ( Deemed University) in respect of students being trained at MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai on or after 2008 " .

[No. U- 12012/25/2009 - ME(P.II ) Vol.1 ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय

(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी , 2011

" IV दंत चिकित्सा विज्ञान संस्थान , भुवनेश्वर

( ii ) दंत चिकित्सा सर्जरी में बैचलर

बीडीएस, उत्कल

(यदिदिनांक 19-10-2010 को

विश्वविद्यालय "

अथवा उसके पश्चात प्रदान की गई )

[फा. सं. वी. -12017/32/2004 - डीई ( खंड.1 ) ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , 5th April , 2011

का.आ. 1019.-सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा नीचे तालिका के कॉलम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारी को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनार्थ सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के समतुल्य अधिकारी की श्रेणी में संपदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है जो उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा अथवा उसके तहत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा और उक्त तालिका के कॉलम (2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट सार्वजनिक परिसरों के संबंध में उसके क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाओं के भीतर संपदा अधिकारी को सौंपे गए कार्यों को निष्पादित करेगा ।

तालिका

अधिकारी का पदनाम

S.O. 1017. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby , makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the saidAct, namely:-

सार्वजनिक परिसरों की श्रेणी और क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं

(2)

(1)

पंजीयक,

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 36, in Part - I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition ofdental degrees awarded by Utkal University, Bhubaneswar , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder:-

भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान , भुवनेश्वर द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से अधिग्रहीत अथवा पट्टे पर लिए गए अथवा

भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान भुवनेश्वर

"IV. Institute of Dental , Sciences , Bhubaneswar.

2996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

(1)

(2)

उससे संबंधित परिसर जो उड़ीसा राज्यके खोर्धा और पुरी जिलों में उसके प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन है ।

[ एफ. सं. 14-25/2010- टीएस -1 ] यतेन्द्र कुमार , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Department ofHigher Education) New Delhi , the 28th February, 2011 S.O. 1019. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants)Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column ( 1 ) ofthe Table below, being the officer equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officer of the Government to be Estate Officer for the purpose of the said Act , who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed , on Estate Officer by or under the said Act within the local limits ofhis jurisdiction in respect of the premises specified in column (2) ofthe said Table .

TABLE

Designation of the officer Categories of public premises and local limits ofjurisdiction .

(2)

(1)

Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar.

Premises belonging to , o r taken on lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of the Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar , which are under, its administrative control in the Districts of Khordha and Puri in the. State of Orissa.

[F.No. 14-25/2010-TS -I ]

YATENDRA KUMAR, Under Secy.

(राजभाषा प्रभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 29 मार्च , 2011

का.आ. 1020.-केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम 4 के अनुसरण में मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय के अन्तर्गत केन्द्रीय विद्यालय संगठन के निम्नलिखित केन्द्रीय विद्यालयों तथा क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय को, ऐसी संस्थाओं के रूप में, जिनमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अधिकारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधि सूचित करती है: -

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] क्र.सं. विद्यालय का नाम तथा पता

(1)

(2)

1. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , गौशाला रोड, मिनसौरी , खगड़िया ( बिहार ) , पिन-851204

2. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , पोस्ट ऑफिस पुण्डरी , हरसिंहपुरा , करनाल , पिन - 132114

3. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, शिवहर , कलावती जियांलाल उच्च विद्यालय परिसर , अम्बाकला ( शिवहर ) , बिहार पिन-843334 4. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं 3 , श्रीनगर पंथा चौक , श्रीनगर (जम्मू एवं कश्मीर) -191101

5. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , न.1 , पठानकोट , वायु सेना स्थल , पठानकोट (पंजाब) - 145001

6. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , न. 4 , पठानकोट, पोस्ट ऑफिस-मैमून कैन्ट, पठानकोट ( पंजाब ) 145001

7. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 1 , गैरिसन अभियन्ता कार्यालय के सामने , जालंधर-छावनी ( पंजाब ) 144005

8. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , सुंजुवान , पोस्ट ऑफिस-सैनिक कॉलोनी, जम्मू( जम्मूएवं कश्मीर ) पिन -180011

9. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नरसिंहपुर ( जिला ) नरसिंहपुर-487001 (म.प्र.)

10. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , हीरानगर , रवि तवी कॉम्पलैक्स , तहसील-हीरानगर, जिला कठुआ ( जम्मूव कश्मीर ) 184142 11. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , कठुआ, मुख्य पोस्ट ऑफिस के पास , मेन बाजार , कठुआ ( जम्मूव कश्मीर ) -184101

12. कैन्द्रीय विद्यालय , पहलगाँव , पो.ओ. लाडीपुरा , पहलगाँव (जम्मूव कश्मीर ) -192126

13. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , सीमा सुरक्षा बल परिसर, राजौरी (जम्मूव कश्मीर ) -185131

14. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, गुलमर्ग , तंगमार्ग , जिला- बारामुल्ला, जम्मू ( जम्मूव कश्मीर) - 193402

15. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 1 , अखनूर , पुराने चिनाब पुल के पास , अखनूर ( जम्मू व कश्मीर ) - 185131

16. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , लखनपुर , पो.ऑ. लखनपुर , जिला-कठुआ (जम्मूव कश्मीर ) -184152

17. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , भनाला , पो.ऑ. शाहपुर , जिला-कांगड़ा (हि.प्र. )- 176206

18. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , चनैनी , जिला- उधमपुर , ( जम्मू व कश्मीर) -182141 997 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल16, 2011/चैत्र 26 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

45. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , वी आर डी ई, अहमदनगर ( मुम्बई ) 19. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, भद्रवाह , लिंक रोड, जिला-डोडा ( जम्मूव कश्मीर)-182222

46. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , मुदखेड , ( मुम्बई)

20. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , कारगिल , ट्रैसपोन , लेह ( लद्दाख ) -194103

47. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , फोरेस्ट रिसर्च इंस्टीटयूट, पो. ऑ. न्यूफॉरेस्ट, देहरादून- 248006

21. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , उडी, एन.एच.पी.सी. गिंगल, पो.ऑ. मोहरा , जिला-बारामुल्ला ( जम्मूव कश्मीर)

48. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , जैतपुर लॉयन स्कूल बिल्डिंग, जूनागढ़ रोड , जैतपुर, जिला राजकोट-260370

22. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , न. 1 , चमेरा , एन.एच.पी.सी. , खौरा जिला- चम्बा ( हि.प्र. ) -176325

49. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , सिलवासा , सरकारी हाई सैकेंड्री स्कूल , तोकरखाडा, सिलवासा ( यू.टी. ) - 396230

23. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 2 , चमेरा , एन.एच.पी.सी. , करीयान , पो. ऑ. हरदासपुर, जिला- चम्बा ( हि.प्र. ) - 176310

50. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , समाना , जामनगर , वायुसेना समाना , जामनगर-360520

24. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , अनन्तनाग ( बिराकपुर ) , अनन्तनाग (जम्मू वकश्मीर ) -192101

51 . केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , क्रम सं. 1 गांधीनगर, सै -30 , गांधीनगर-382030 25. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , भिण्ड , लाहार रोड, भिण्ड ( म.प्र. )

26. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , भोपाल 1 , मैदा मिल के सामने , होशंगाबाद रोड, भोपाल -11

52. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , द्वारका, शारदा पीठ कॉलेज कैम्पस , संस्कृत एकादमी के सामने , द्वारका, जिला- जामनगर , पिन-361335

53 . केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, क्रम सं. 1 बड़ौदा , हरनी रोड, बड़ौदा 27. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , सीहोर , प्रोफेसर कालोनी के पास , सीहोर (म.प्र.)

28. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , छतरपुर , महोबा रोड , छतरपुर ( म.प्र. )

54. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 3 , एम एल बी परिसर , गोपालगंज , सागर, मध्य प्रदेश

29. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , धार , चाणक्यपुरी - धार ( म.प्र. )

55. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 2 , गोरखपुर , भारतीय खाद्य निगम कैंपस , गोरखपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश पिन-273007

30. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 4 , ग्वालियर, वायु सेना स्थल , महाराजपुर, ग्वालियर

56. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , गंगटोक, पो. ओ. तादोंग , सिक्किम-737102 31. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 5 , ग्वालियर , शास्त्री नगर , ग्वालियर (म.प्र.)

57. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , अंकलेश्वर , ओ.एन.जी.सी. कॉलोनी , अंकलेश्वर , जिला- भरूच , गुजरात

32. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , सी.आर.पी.एफ. , नागुपर , हिंगना रोड, नागपुर

33. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , शाजापुर (म.प्र. )

58. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं. 2 , जामनगर , आई एन एफ लाईन्स, जामनगर , गुजरात -361005

34. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , मुंगोली जिला अशोक नगर (म.प्र. )

59. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , गोधरा नगरपालिका अस्पताल पटेलवाडा के ऊपर , नवा बाजार गोधरा , पंचमहल , गुजरात-389001 35. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , पन्ना शासकीय पौलिटेक्निक के पास , पन्ना (म.प्र.)

36. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, श्योपुर , कलेक्ट्रेट के पीछे ( म.प्र. )

60. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय संगठन , आंचलिक शिक्षा एवं प्रशिक्षण संस्थान , सै. 33-सी, चंडीगढ़

[सं. 11011-1/2011 - रा.भा.ए. ] 37. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , सीधी , मुख्य डाकघर के पास , जिला- सीधी (म.प्र. )-486661 (म.प्र. )

डॉ. अनिता भटनागर जैन , संयुक्त सचिव

(O.L. Division)

38. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , डी आई ए टी, गिरीनगर , सिंहरोड , पुणे- 411025

New Delhi , the 29th March , 2011

39. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, एन सी. एच , कालोनी , भांडुप -78 मुम्बई

40. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय, एन ए डी रायगढ़ , करंजा ( मुम्बई )

41. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , माले गांव , धुले-424001

42. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , मध्य रेलवे , मनमाड, नासिक-423104

43. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , गोधनी रोड , यवतमाल -445001

S.O. 1020. In pursuance of sub -rule (4) of rule 10 ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following Kendriya Vidyalayas and Regional office ofKendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan under the Ministry ofHuman Resource Development, whose more than 80% members of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:-

44. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , नं.1 करि, अहमदनगर -414002 ( मुम्बई )

1217 GI /11-2 2998

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA26, 1933

S.No. Name of theVidyalaya and Address (1)

(2)

11 Kendriya Vidyalaya, Gaushala Road , Minsauri , Khagaria, (Bihar ) Pin - 851204

2 Kendriya Vidyalaya , P.O. Pundri , Harsinghpura, Karnal , Pin- 132114

3 Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sheohar, Kalawati Jiyalal High School Campus , Amba Kala, Distt .(Sheohar) Bihar- Pin-843334

Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 3 , Srinagar, Pantha Chowk, Srinagar ( J&K) -191101

Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 1 , Pathankot , AFS , Pathankot (Punjab) -145001

6 Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 4 , Panthankot , P.O. MamoonCantt, Pathankot (Punjab) - 145001 Kendriya Vidyalaya , No. 1 Opposite the office of GarrisonEngineer, Jalandhar Cantt . (Punjab) - 144005 Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sunjuwan , P.O. Sainik Colony, Jammu ( J& K)-180011

KendriyaVidyalaya, Narsinghpur , Distt. Narsinghpur (Μ.Ρ.) -487001

10. KendriyaVidyalaya , Hira Nagar, Ravi.Tawi Complex, Tehsil Hira Nagar, Distt . Kathua ( J& K) - 184142 11. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Near Main Post Office , Main Market, Kathua ( J &K) -184101

Kendriya Vidyalaya , Pahalgam , P.O. - Ladipura , Pahalgam (J &K) -192126

13. Kendriya Vidyalaya , BSF Campus , Rajouri ( J&K) -185131

Kendriya Vidyalaya , Gulmarg , Tangmarg , Distt. Baramulla ( J &K) -193402

5.Kendriya Vidyalaya , No. 1 , Akhnoor , Near old Chenab bridge, Akhnoor ( J & K) -185131

Kendriya Vidyalaya , Kathua , Lakhanpur P.O. Lakhanpur, Distt . Kathua (J & K) - 184152 17. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Bhanala , P.O. Shahpur , Distt . Kangra(HP) -176206

18. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Chenani , Distt . Udampur (J&K) -182141

19. Kendriya Vidyalaya . Bhaderwah , Link Road, Distt. Doda (J &K)-182222

20. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Kargil , Trespone , Leh (Laddakh) -194103

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 21. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Uri , NHPC,Gingle , Post Office- Mohra, Distt. Baramulla (J&K)

22. Kendriya Vidyalaya, No. 1 Chamera, NHPC, Khaira, Distt. Chamba (HP)-176325

23. Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 2, Bhanala, Chamera, NHPC , Kariyan, P.O. Hardashpur, Distt. Chamba (HP)-176310 24. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Anantnag (Birakpur ), Anantnag (J&K)-192101

25. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Bhind , Lahar Road, Bhind (MP) 26. KendriyaVidyalaya No.1 , Bhopal , Opp . Maida Mill, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal- 11

27. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sehore , Near Professor Colony, Sehore(MP)

28. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Chhatarpur , Mahoba Road , Chhatarpur (MP)

29. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Dhar, Chanakyapuri , Dhar (MP) 30. Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 4, Gwalior, AFS , Maharajpur, Gwalior(MP)

31. Kendriya Vidyalaya , No. 5 , Gwalior, Shastri Nagar, Gwalior(MP)

32. Kendriya Vidyalaya, CRPF, Nagpur, Hingana Road, Nagpur

33 . Kendriya Vidyalaya, Shajapur (MP)

KendriyaVidyalaya, Mungaoli , Distt . Ashok Nagar (MP) 34.

35. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Panna , Near of Govt . Polytechnic , Panna (MP)

36. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Sheopur , Back Side of Collectrate(MP)

37. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Sidhi Near HPO, Distt. Sidhi (M.P. ) Pin - 486661

38. Kendriya Vidyalaya, DIAT Giri Nagar, Singh Road , Pune- 411025

39. Kendriya Vidyalaya , NCH Colony, Bhadup - 78 (Mumbai)

40. Kendriya Vidyalaya , NAD , Raigarh , Karanja (Mumbai)

41 . Kendriya Vidyalaya, Malegaon, Dhule- 424001 42. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Central Railway, Manmad, Nasik-423104

43. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Godhani Road , Yawatmal- 445001 (Mumbai)

44. Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 1 , Kari , Ahmednagar -414002 (Mumbai) 2999 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल16, 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

संशोधन की

क्रम

संशोधित भारतीय

45. Kendriya Vidyalaya, VRDE,Ahmednagar (Mumbai)

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संख्या और तिथि

सं. मानक ( कों) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

46. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mudkher (Mumbai )

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31-03-2011 47. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Forest Research Institute, P.O. New Forest, Dehradun -248006

संशोधन संख्या 1 मार्च, 2011

1. आईएस 3005 ( Part1 ): 1979 -कोरे ढलवां इस्पात के इंगट

48. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Jaitpur Lion's School Building Junagarh Road, Jaitpur, Distt. Rajkot- 260370

49. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Silvasa Govt . H.S. School , Tokarkhada, Silvassa (UT) -396230

सांचे, स्टूल और धातुमल लैडल की विशिष्टि भाग 1 8 टन एवं इससे ज्यादा भार के बड़े आकार के इंगट सांचे के बॉटम स्टूल ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

50. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Samana, Jamnagar , AFS Samana, Jamanagar - 360520

51. Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 , Gandhinagar Sec . 30 , Gandhinagar- 382030

इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, पटना नागपुर , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

52. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Dwarka Sardha Peeth College Campus, Opp . Sanskrit Academy, Dwarka- Distt . Jamnagar- 361335

[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 6/टी-2 ] 53. Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 , Baroda, Harní Road , Baroda

पी. घोष, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

54. Kendriya Vidyalaya No.3 , MLB Campus , Gopalgunj , Sagar(MP)

(Department of ConsumerAffairs) 55. Kendriya Vidyalaya No.2 , Gorakhpur , Bhartiya Khadya Niagam Campus , Gorakhpur U.P. -273007

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDAR DS New Delhi, the 6th April , 2011

56. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Gangtok P.O. Tadong, Sikkim , Pin- 737102

57. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Ankheshar, ONGC Colony, Ankleshwar, Distt . Bharuch, Gujrat .

S.O. 1021. -In pursuance of clause (b) of sub rule ( 1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of IndianStandards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards particulars of which are given in the Schedule here to annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

58. Kendriya Vidyalaya No.2 , Jamnagar , INF Lines , Jamnagar, Gujrat- 361005

S. No. No. and Title of the standard (s)

No. & year of the amend- ment

59. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Godhra , above Municipality Hospital Patelwada, Nava Bazar, Godhra Panchmahal , Gujarat- 389001

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (4)

(3)

(1) (2)

Amendment No.1 31-03-2011

March, 2011

IS 3005 ( Part 1 ): 1979 Specification for grey

60. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sangathan , Zonal Institute of Education and Training, Chandigarh , Sector - 33 -C, Chandigarh

[No. 11011-1 /2011 -O.L.U . ]

cast iron ingot moulds , stools and slag ladles part1 Bottom stools for

Dr. ANITA BHATNAGAR JAIN , Jt . Secy.

large size ingot moulds weighing 8 tonnes and

higher ( first revision)

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 6 अप्रैल , 2011

Copies of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhawan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MTD 6/T-2]

P. GHOSH, Sc . ' F ' & Head ( Met Engg. ) का. आ. 1021.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अधिसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

4:30

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 6 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1022.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और वार्षिक

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि 1.

31-03-2011 आई एस 13229:1991- जस्तीकरण के लिये जस्ता विशिष्टि

संशोधन संख्या 3

मार्च, 2011

इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वरं , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

तिथि06-07-2011

[संदर्भ : एम टी डी 9 /टी-50 ]

पी. घोष वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

NewDelhi , the 6th April , 2011

S.O. 1022. In pursuance ofclause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

S.No. No. and Title of the Standards(s)

No. and Year of the

amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

31-3-2011

1. IS 13229 : 1991 Zinc for galvanizing - Specification

Amendment No. 3, March, 2011

Copy ofthis Amendment are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also BranchOffices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram. Date:06-07-2011

[Ref:MTD 9 /T- 50]

P. GHOSH Sc ' F ' & Head ( Met Engg .)

नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1023.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के संशोधन के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

संशोधन की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या , वर्ष औरशीर्षक

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि (2)

(1)

(3)

(4) 1.

संशोधन संख्या 2 वर्ष , 2007

1 अक्तूबर , 2010 आई एस 3309: 1992 विलेय काफी कासनी चूर्ण -विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

संशोधन संख्या 3 वर्ष, 2009

1 अक्तूबर, 2010 आई एस 3309: 1992 विलेय काफी कासनी चूर्ण -विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 3001

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

31मार्च 2011

संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष 2011

3. आई एस 6613 : 2002 एल्कोहॉलिए पेयों के लिए उदासीन स्प्रिट-विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

संशोधन संख्या 5 वर्ष 2010

आई एस 7539:1975 कारबारिल तकनीकी की

31अक्तूबर 2010 विशिष्टि

संशोधन संख्या 2 वर्ष 2010

01दिसंबर 2010 5. आई एस 7976: 1976 फोरेट , तकनीकी की विशिष्टि

संशोधन संख्या 3 वर्ष 2010

31जुलाई 2010 आई एस 10500:1991 पीने का पानी- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

24फरवरी 2011

संशोधन संख्या 3 वर्ष 2011

7. आई एस 11785: 1986 केपटन ( गीला पाउडर ) डब्ल्यूपी की विशिष्टि

31जनवरी 2011

संशोधन संख्या 3 वर्ष 2011

8. आई एस 12005: 1987 डेल्टामेथरीन तकनीकी की विशिष्टि

31जनवरी 2011

संशोधन संख्या 2 वर्ष 2011

9. आई एस 14251 : 1995 केपटन, तकनीकी विशिष्टि

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चेन्नई , मुम्बई , चण्डीगढ़ तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एफएडी/जी-128 ] तिथि 08 अप्रैल , 2011

डॉ. आर. के. बजाज , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( खाद्य एवं कृषि )

New Delhi , the 8th April, 2011

S.O. 1023.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date ofwhich the

Sl.No.

No. and Year ofthe

Amendment

No. &Year of the Indian Standards

amendment shall have effect

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

01October 2010

AmendmentNo. 2 ,

Year 2007

IS 3309 : 1992 Soluble Coffee- Chicory Powder-Specification (second revision)

01 October 2010

Amendment No. 3 ,

Year 2009

2. IS 3309 : 1992 Soluble Coffee- Chicory Powder-Specification (second revision )

31March 2011

Amendment No. 1 ,

Year 2011

3. IS 6613: 2002 Neutral spirit for alcoholic drinks-Specification (firstrevision)

31 October 2010

Amendment No. 5 ,

Year 2010

4. IS 7539 : 1975 Specification for Carbaryl , Technical

01December2010

Amendment No. 2 ,

Year 2010

5. IS 7976 : 1976 Specification for phorate, technical 3002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

31 July 2010

AmendmentNo. 3 ,

Year 2010

6. IS 10500: 1991 Drinking Water- Specification

24 February 2011

Amendment No. 3 ,

Year 2011

7. IS 11785 : 1986 Specification for captain(Wettable Powder) WP

31 January2011 8. IS 12005: 1987 Specification for Deltamethrin , technical

Amendment No. 3 ,

Year 2011

31January2011

Amendment No. 2,

Year 2011

9. IS 14251 : 1995 Captan , technical- Specification

Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices :Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

Date: 8April , 2011

[Ref: FAD/G-128]

Dr. R. K. BAJAJ , Sc ' F ' & Head ( Food &Agri .)

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 5 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1024.-केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के उपक्रमों के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 या अधिक प्रतिशत कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :-

हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड

1. उत्तर मध्य अंचल , लखनऊ कार्यालय

प्लाट नम्बर-1 , नेहरू एन्क्लेव

गोमती नगर , लखनऊ-226 010

ऑयल एंड नेचुरल गैस कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड

2. हजारी संयंत्र , नया मगदल्ला , पो.-ओएनजीसी नगर , सूरत-394 518

[संख्या 11011/1/2011 (हिन्दी) ] जानकी आहूजा , उप निदेशक ( रा. भा. ) MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 5th April , 2011

S.O. 1024. In pursuance of Sub- Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official porposes ofthe Union ) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , in which 80 or more percent of the staff have acquired working Knowledge ofHindi :-

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited 1. North - Central Zone , Lucknow Office , Plot No. - 1 , Nehru Enclave , Gomati Nagar, Lucknow-226010

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited

2. Hazira Plant, NewMagdalla, Post-ONGC Nagar , Surat-394518

[No. 11011/1/2011 (Hindi) ]

JANKI AHUJA , Dy. Director (OL) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1025.-भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2432( अ ) तारीख 27 सितम्बर , 2010 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टर्मिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- बासुदेबपुर- हावडा ट्रंक गैस पाइपलाइन की टैप आफ फैसिलिटी , जो आन्ध्र प्रदेश में विशाखापटनम जिले के जंगुलुरू बेलापालेम गांव में स्थित है , से एक स्पर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 28 दिसम्बर , 2010 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और , पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में, जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया;

और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और , भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और , भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से , भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इनफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : विशाखापटनम मंडल /तहसील/तालुक : एस. रायवरम राज्य : आन्ध प्रदेश

गाँव का नाम

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल सर्वेसं. /सब डिविजन सं.

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

(4) (5)

(3)

(2)

(1)

343

1. जंगुलुरू

278

वेलापालेम

3003

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

275

1. जंगुलुरू वेलापालेम ( निरंतर ) 274

133

134

136

137

215

213

212

211

69 210

18 209

00 208

194

195

191

196

190

172

173

169

355/2

341/2

277/2

132/1

10 88

48/1

48/2

341/1

341/3

जिला : विशाखापटनम मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: रामबिल्ली राज्य: आन्ध प्रदेश

152

1.डिमेला

151

155

148

147

125

158

121

123

122

192 3004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 00

194

1.डिमेला (निरंतर )

485

1.डिमेला (निरंतर )

193

00 02

205/ 1ए

61 116

205/1बी

32 00

200

205/1सी

99 201

205/ 1एफ

27 202

205/2ए

31 00

203

205/2बी

24 204

207/2

207/3

17 208

49 00

493/6

25 230

300

61 00

232

2. कटुबोलु

3. ममिडिवाडा

258

46 231

242/1

13 228

242/2

93 224

241/3

44 226

243/1

36 225

243/2

10 00

386

244/8

15 384

244/6

40 387

264/1

72 383

264/2

96 388

260/13

27 382

260/14

58 379

260/12

44 381

260/9

15 380

260/10

42 374

260/11

89 540

260/5

40 534

261/6

77 537

261/1

84 536

261/5

51 535

261/4

24 538

219/2

50 519

219/8

36 518

219/9

19 517

219/7

04 542

4. पंचादरला

271

70 543

272

20 00

544

268

02 545

177

46 00

490

182

51 489

183

152

491

01 488

129

85 00

03 487

107

00 .

08 00

95 486

64 3005

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(1)

(4)

(3)

(2).

(1)

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

4. पंचादरला ( निरंतर) 134/1

103

4. पंचादरला ( निरंतर )

102

101

275/3

10 85

275/2

275/1

274/6

274/3

274/2

274/1

269/1

176/2

176/3

175/2

175/6

185/2

185/1

185/21

185/22

185/31

185/28

00 02

185/27

185/26

185/25

185/24

185/23

5. हरिपुरम

186/1

135/18

135/4

91 135/5

135/6

135/7

135/8

135/10

135/9

135/14

136/10

136/13

136/14

136/15

136/16

142/6

142/7

142/11

142/12

10 134/2

1217 GI /11-3

134/3

143/11

144/2

144/3

145/5

145/4

145/3

145/2

150/4

150/1

151/1

153/3

29/1ए

106/4

109/2

109/1

108/1

108/2

104/2

104/3

115/1

115/3

115/2

143/12

117/1

129

131

00 02

93/2ए

93/2बी

93/2सी

93/4सी

93/4डी

93/4ई

93/4एफ

93/4जी

93/4एच

93/6ए

93/6बी

93/1 3006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (2)

(1)

(3)

(5)

(4)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 00

5. हरिपुरम (निरंतर) 93/7ए

5. हरिपुरम (निरंतर) 53/6

130/2

53/9

36 130/1

53/8

00 00

92/ 1ए

53/11

58 128/4

53/13

23 128/5

53/14

86 00

128/3ए

53/15

17 128/3बी

00 03

53/21

42 128/3डी

53/16

51 128/3 ई

53/17

21 128/3जी

52/2एफ

10 128/2 एम

52/2जी

02 05 128/2के

52/2एच

128/2आई

52/3ए

128/2जे

52/3बी

17 128/2एफ

52/3सी

18 00

128/2जी

52/3एफ

59 00

128/2डी

जिला : विशाखापटनम 00

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक : अच्युतापुरम

128/2ई

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

128/2सी

57/4

194

1. वेदुरूवाडा

173

01 57/5ए

171

57/5बी

126

57/5सी

101

05 57/5डी

57/6

109

38 66/1

108

76 00

66/2ए

66/2बी

201/2

27 00

66/3बी

200/2

65/12

195/ 1ए

195/ 1बी

00 65/11

65/10

181/6

22 00

65/8

47 00

181/15

65/7

193/2

90 00

65/6

182/6

71 00

08 65/2

182/5

65/3

16 00

182/8ए

182/8बी

65/4

94 00

00 65/9

182/8ई

182/8एफ

58/3ए

81 58/2

182/ 10एफ

182/ 10ई

03 58/1 ई

34 00

58/1डी

182/10डी

182/10सी

58/ 1सी

182/10बी

53/5

89 00

58 3007

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(5)

(1)

(3) (4)

(2)

(1)

182/10ए

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

97/2पी

97/224

1. वेदुरूवाडा

(निरंतर)

183/1 ई

1. वेदुरूवाडा (निरंतर)

183/ 1ए

183/1बी

183/2

176/6

176/16

176/15

176/14

176/11

176/12

176/13

175/3

175/4

175/5डी

175/5सी

175/5ई

175/5एफ

2. दुप्पीतुरू

175/5आई

175/5जे

170/1

170/2ए

172/27

172/26

172/15

172/28

167/8

167/7बी

73 167/7ए

167/7सी

56 167/6बी

167/6ए

40 167/5

167/4

167/3

167/2बी

68 167/1बी

167/1ए

166/12

38 166/11

10 .

166/10

125/1

125/2

125/3

100/2

97/2क्यू

97/2के

10 96/13

96/12

82 96/11

83 96/10

96/5

95/1

90/1

90/2

91/1

93/4

106/2

106/4

106/5

106/3

468

21 469

432

434

427

00 96 466

464

465

37 460

470

471

473

472

475

11 41

455/1

454/1ए

454/ 1एए

454/1 ई

454/1 ईई

10 454/2ए

456/3जे

456/3सी 3008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 00

2. दुप्पीतुरू (निरंतर ) 456/3 आई.

3. भोगापुरम (निरंतर ) 48

00 456/3के

78 461/3बी

57 00

-461/3ए

01 95 461/3सी

73 461/3डी

80 461/3ई

02 461/8सी

4. मद्धिरू

96 461/3जी

99 00

461/3एच

478

68 461/8जी

120

31 461/8एफ

116

82. 00

461/8आई

118

92 461/8एच

00 02

117

58 461/8जे

113

34 00

463/1ए

140

90 463/1बी

142

84 463/1सी

143

09 463/1डी

109

56 463/2

307

20 467/3

305

12 467/2

304

32 467/6

303

76 00

441/1

422

39 425/4

428

58 425/3

429

03 425/2

430

68 00

424/1ए

431

17 426/4

451

20 428/4

00 03

443

74 00

399/1ए

441

83 44/1सी

445

90 44/1डी

440

47 44/1बी

447

00 44/1 ई

40/2

30 92

3. भोगापुरम

40/3

86 91

39/2

37 87

39/1

00 93

114/1

67 86

114/2

70 85

114/3

10 82

112/1

16 79

112/2

51 78

306/1

49 77

306/2

39 75

288/2

42 3009

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011/चैत्र26,1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(4) (5)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

(1).

91/5डी

297/1

4. मदिटुरू ( निरंतर )

91/5ई

6. रविपालेम

(निरंतर)

297/4

94/2बी

297/5

94/2ए

423/1

94/2सी

423/2

00 00

94/2डी

152

5. दोसुरू

94/2एफ

151

94/2ई

134

94/3

135

94/4जी

127

94/4एफ

245

94/4ई

280

94/4डी

153/10

94/4बी

153/11

01 01

94/4सी

150/1

94/5सी

141/1

94/5बी

141/2

94/5ए

141/3

94/6ए

139/2

94/6बी

136/1

94/1

130/4

103/1

130/3

103/2

129/4

77/2

128/3

77/1

128/2

75/4

00- 04

108/1

68/14

106/2

68/15

106/1

68/16

107/1

68/17

110/4

68/18

105/1

68/12

105/2

68/3

105/3

68/11

6. रविपालेम

68/4

68/10

68/8

104

68/9

68/7

7. नदिमपल्ली

45/5

45/4सी

45/4डी

45/4ई

83/12

45/3

83/8

45/2

83/2ए

91/6 3010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 83/1

50/9

1. देवाडा (निरंतर )

28 7. नदिमपल्ली (निरंतर)

1/2

50/11

55 1/1

50/12

62 2

8. गंगामंबापुरम

50/13

76 मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: परवाडा

50/1

00 जिला : विशाखापट्टनम

68 राज्य : आन्ध प्रदेश

53/1

19 1. पेन्टासीमाबोनांगी 10

[फा. सं. एल-14014/48/2010 - जी.पी. ] 18/6

के. के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव 2. कलपाका

New Delhi, the 11th April , 2011 6

2/1

8/8

8/9

8/25

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: पेदागंतयाडा जिला : विशाखापट्टनम

राज्य: आन्ध प्रदेश

1. देवाडा

S.O. 1025. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2432 (E) dated 27th September, 2010 , issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying a spurpipeline from the tap- off facility of Kakinada-- Basudebpur-Howrah trunk gas pipeline at Janguluru Velampalem village in Visakhapatnam District of the State ofAndhra Pradesh for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East Coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s. Reliance Industries Limited by M /s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to consumers in various parts ofthe country;

2/1

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 28thDecember, 2010;

2/2

2/4

3/1

Andwhereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

27/1

34/2

34/3

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Government of India;

34/4

34/5

34/1

Andwhereas, Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the RightofUser therein;

49/1

49/3

49/4

49/9

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

49/10

49/11

49/12

50/3

50/4

50/6

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 ofthe said Act , Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date ofpublication ofthe declaration , in M/ s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , free from all encumbrances .

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

(1) Mandal /Tehsil/Taluk : S. Rayavaram

3011

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

1. Dimela (Contd. ) 155

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Visakhapatnam

Area to be acquired

Survey No./

Village

for RoU

Sub-Division

No.

C-Are

Are

Hec

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

343

1. Janguluru

278

Velampalem

275

274

133

134

136

137

215

09 00

213

212

211

210

209

208

194

195

191

196

190

172

173

169

17 6

355/2

341/2

00 10

277/2

132/1

48/1

48/2

39 341/1

341/3

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Rambilli

State : Andhra Pradesh District : Visakhapatnam

152

1. Dimela

151

148

147

125

158

121

123

122

192

194

193

116

200

201

202

203

204

208

00 230

232

231

228

224

226

225

386

384

387

383

388

382

379

381

380

374

540

534

537

536

535

538

519

518 3012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 00

4. Panchadarla

1Dimela ( Contd.) 517

271

02 00

542

272

20 00

543

268

02 544

177

46 545

182

51 490

183

11 489

152

01 491

1 488

129

85 487

107

08 486

103

20 485

102

66 205/ 1A

101

33 205/1B

275/3

30 205/1 C

275/2

85 205/ 1F

275/1

06 205 /2A

274/6

88 205/2B

274/3

10 207/2

10 94

274/2

41 207/3

274/1`

85 493/6

269/1

28 300

2Kattubolu

176/2

66 258

3 Mamidivada

176/3

69 242/1

175/2

60 242/2

175/6

60 00

241/3

185/2

00 00

243/1

185/1

58 00

243/2

185/21

48 244/8

185/22

05 244/6

185/31

10 264/1

185/28

52 264/2

185/27

30 260/13

185/26

260/14

185/25

94 260/12

185/24

91 260/9

185/23

47 260/10

186/1

72 260/11

135/18

65 260/5

135/4

10 261/6

135/5

91 261/1

135/6

22 261/5

261/4

135/7

04 219/2

135/8

04 00

08 219/8

135/10

66 00

219/9

135/9

37 00

219/7

135/14

58 3013

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

136/10

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

93/2C

93/4C

5.Haripuram

(Contd.)

136/13

4. Panchadarla (Contd.)

136/14

136/15

136/16

142/6

09 142/7

01.

142/11

142/12

134/2

134/1

134/3

143/11

144/2

144/3

145/5

145/4

145/3

145/2

150/4

150/1

151/1

153/3

29/1A

106/4

109/2

109/1

108/1

108/2

104/2

104/3

115/1

115/3

115/2

143/12

117/1

5.Haripuram

129

131

93/2A

93/2B

1217 GI /11-4

93/4D

93/4E

93/4F

93/4G

93/4H

93/6A

93/6B

93/1

93/7 A

130/2

130/1

92/ 1A

128/4

128/5

128/3A

128/3B

128/3D

128/3E

128/3G

128/2M

128/2K

128/21

128/2J

128/2F

128/2G

128/2D

128/2E

128/2C

57/4

57/5A

57/5B

57 /5C

57/5D

57/6

66/1

66/2A

66/2B

66/3B

65/12

65/11

65/10

65/8

65/7

65/6 3014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16 , 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEE. 3( ii )] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(3 ) (4) (5)

(2)

65/2

00 99

1. Veduravada

182/8A

16 15 65/3

5.Haripuram (Contd.)

182/8B

(Contd.)

94 65/4

182/8E

88 65/9

182/8F

10 58/3A

182/ 10F

81 58/2

182/ 10E

03 34 58/ 1E

182/10D

41 58/ID

182/10C

10 58/ 1C

182/ 10B

89 53/5

182/10A

00 23 53/6

183/ 1E

10 53/9

183/ 1A

13 53/8

183/ 1B

74 53/11

183/2

57 53/13

176/6

06 53/14

176/16

10 53/15

176/15

25 53/21

176/14

89 53/16

176/11

36 53/17

176/12

62 52/2F

176/13

55 52/2G

175/3

96 52/2H

175/4

06 00

52/3A

175/5D

29 52/3B

175/5C

60 52/3C

175/5E

05 52/3F

175/5F

93 Mandal /Tehsil/Taluk : Atchutapuram

175/51

11 strict:Vishakapatnam

175/5J

State : Andhra Pradesh

170/1

Veduravada 191

170 /2A

173

172/27

171

92 126

172/26

101

172/15

56 94

172/28

56 109

167/8

04 108

167/7B

76 201/2

167/7A

73 200/2

167/7C

34 195/ 1A

167/6B

56 195/ 1B

167/6A

29 181/6

167/5

40 181/15

167/4

42 193/2

167/3

02 182/6

167/2B

51 182/5

167//B

68 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(1)

(4) (5)

(2)

(3)

(1)

38 167/ 1A

166/12

3015

(5)

(3)

(2)

(4)

455/1

2.Duppiturru

(Contd.)

1. Veduravada (Contd.)

166/11

00 166/10

20 125/1

00 125/2

125/3

20 100/2

08 97/2Q

01 97 /2P

02 97 /2T

97 /2K

00 96/13

70 96/12

01 96/11

03 96/10

96/5

95/1

90/1

90/2

91/1

93/4

11 106/2

106/4

106/5

106/3

468

2.Duppiturru

469

432

434

427

466

-31

464

465

460

470

471

473

472

475

454/ 1A

454/ 1AA

454/ 1E

454/1EE

454/2A

456/3J

00.

456/3C

456/31

456/3K

461/3B

461/3A

03 .

461/3C

461/3D

461/3E

461/8C

461/3G

461/3H

461/8G

461/8F

461/81

461/8H

461/8J

463/ 1A

463/1B

463/1C

463/ 1D

463/2

467/3

05 06 467/2

467/6

441/1

425/4

425/3

425/2

424/ 1A

64 426/4

428/4

399/ 1A

00. 12

44/1C

44/AD

44/ 1B

44/ 1E 1016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA26, 1933

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5) 92

114/2

70 3.Bhogapuram

114/3

4.Maditurru (Contd.)

112/1

16 93

112/2

51 86

306/1

38 85

306/2

39 82

288/2

42 79

297/1

50 78

297/4

14 77

297/5

00 75

423/1

46 48

423/2

02 38

152

! 5. Dosuru

151

98 39

134

50 00

135

19 41.

127

10 43

245

93 43

4.Maditurru

280

13 38

153/10

13 00

478

153/11

96 00

120

150/1

03 116

141/1

17 118

141/2

00 117

141/3

113

139/2

62 00

140

136/1

22 142

130/4

58 143

130/3

44 00

109

129/4

307

128/3

60 00

305

128/2

10 40 00

304

108/1

09 303

106/2

37 422

106/1

64 428

107/1

15 429

110/4

79 430

105/1

46 431

105/2

451

105/3

24 00

443

.Ravipalem

441

46 445

36 440

104

37 447

21 40/2

29 40/3

45/5

39/2

45/4C

96 00

39/1

45/4D

34 114/1

45/4E

11 3017

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

45/3

8.Gangamambapuram 2

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Paravada

45/2

6.Ravipalem (Contd.)

State : Andhra Pradesh

91/6

District : Vishakapatnam

52 65

91/5D

1. Pentasimabonangi 10

18/6

91/5E

94/2B

2.Kalapaka

94/2A

90 00

94/2C

00 00 00 00

94/2D

2/1

94/2F

06 00

94/2E

8/8

94/3

8/9

94/4G

8/25

94/4F

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Pedagantyada

04 03

94/4E

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Vishakapatnam

94/4D

1. Devada

94/4B

94/4C

94/5C

94/5B

94/5A

94/6A

00 20

94/6B

2/1

94/1

2/2

103/1

2/4

103/2

3/1

77/2

27/1

77/1

34/2

75/4

34/3

68/14

34/4

68/15

34/5

68/16

34/1

68/17

49/1

68/18

49/3

68/12

49/4

68/3

49/9

68/11

49/10

68/4

01.

49/11

68/10

49/12

68/8

50/3

68/9

50/4

68/7

50/6

7. Nadimpalli

50/9

50/11

50/12

50/13

83/12

50/1

83/8

53/1

83/2A

83/1

1/2

[F. No. L- 14014/48/2010 -GP. ] K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

1/1 3018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1026.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलयिम और खनिज पाइमलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 3090 तारीख 30 अक्तूबर , 2009 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर काकीनाडा स्थित अपतटीय गैस प्रसंस्करण टर्मिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा विजयवाडा नेल्लोर चेन्नई गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 7 अगस्त, 2010 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और , पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में , जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया;

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और , भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप -धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

मंडल/तहसील/ जिला : प्रकाशम राज्य आंध्र प्रदेश तालुक: नागुलुप्पालपाडु

क्रम गांव का

सं. नाम

सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं.

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर सि. एयर (1) (2)

(3) (4) (5) 77

1- मटीगुन्टा

00 01 55 100

00 02 99

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1) (2)

(3) (45) 101

1. मटटीगुन्टा

00 01 35 153

(निरंतर)

00 11 51 227

00 20 30 228

00 04 24 229

00 54 94 240

00 07 72 70/21

00 09 47 70/20

00 07 80 70/14

00 20 29 70/13

00 00 53 71/4ए1

00 15 63 76/1

00 39 70 78/1

79/2

00 38 39 79/1

00 13 48 92/ 1सी

00 00 30 92/2सी

00 00 36 93/1

00 31 89 94/2

00 31 81 94/3

00 05 83 94/1

00 02 04 95/3

00 24 96 95/2

00 16 14 99/3

00 30 08 102/1

00 00 73 102/2

140/3

00 35 47 141/14

01 32

141/13

00 02 14 141/6

00 04 80 141/5

00 04 29 141/4

00 08 83 141/2

00 05 144/11

00 00 84 144/12

00 01 43 144/14

00 03 08 144/15

02 144/24

00 01 41 144/25

00 06 80 144/26

00 02 20 144/27

00 07 51 144/38

00 06 39 144/3

00 07 76 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3019

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011/चैत्र 26 , 1933

(1) (2)

(3) (45) 1. मटटीगुन्टा 144/44

(1) (2)

(3) ( 45) .

2. उप्पुगुन्हूर

144/45

00 04 23 (निरंतर)

145/1बी

00 15 44 145/1सी

00 02 145/16

00 00 22 145/14

00 10 07 145/15

00 03 28 145/13

00 03 46

19 154/1ए।

00 18

00 00 10 154/12

154/2बी

00 02 33 230/1

00 11

46 230/2

00 51 238/4

00 00 17 238/3

00 25 96 238/2

00 09 19 239/1

00 14 84 239/4

00 25 19 239/3

00 08 06 241/2

00 05 22 241/5

00 11 38 241/6

00 26 10 241/7बी1

00 04 16 241/1

00 00 76

00 02 33 241/7ए

00 12 90 272

2. उप्पुगुन्दूर

285

00 11 74

00 09 55 287

00 06 36 307

गट नंबर 307 में नाला

00 02 05 गट नंबर 320 में रास्ता

00 07 34

00 06 26 324

327

00.03

331

13 369

00 04 85

00 59 09 373

00 37 21 397

00 05 33 गट नंबर 425 में नाला

427

00 16 88

00 38 67 452

00 19 14 453

48 454

00 03

00 21 78 252/बी2

00 21 69 252/ 1 एउ

252/ 1 बी

00 02 60

00 32 31 (निरंतर) 254/5

254/7

18 254/8

00 08 254/9

00 07

00 15 58 254/13

254/19

00 13 265/6

00 07 08 265/5बी

00 21 265/5सी

00 19 65 265/5डी

00 05 07.

44 265/5ई

00 16

37 65

265/3ए

00 15 74 265/1ए

265/1बी

00 13 64

265/1सी

12 53 266/1बी

00 00 22 267/1

00 00 66 267/2

00 01 28

72 283/10

00 69

00 17 284/3

00 02 07 286/1/ए

286/2

00 02 73 288/3

00 27 19

288/4

10 74 288/7

00 07 83 288/8

00 04 50 288/9

00 02 19 291/1

00 15 83 291/2

00 02 86

00 19 36 312/1ए

00 13 01 312/1/बी

00 14 40 312/1/ई

312/2/सी

19 71

312/3/ए

20 20 312/3 /बी

00 12 64

00 05 70 312/3/सी

00 08 56 317/ 1ए

317/2बी

00 13 14

00 04 13 317/1सी

317/2डी

06 11 317/2सी

00 04 85 3020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA26, 1933

(2)

(1)

(3) (45) .

317/1डी

00 02 85 317/3बी

2. उप्पुगुन्डुर (निरंतर)

00 30 35 317/ 1 ई

98 317/1जी

00 00 48

00 13 317/3डी

322/2बी

04 64

00 07 323/2ए

323/2बी

00 19 81 325/2

00 10 35 325/1

00 19 25

325/3

12 72 332/10

00 27 31 335/2

00 00 48 372/2

00 09 15 378/1

00 25 37 379/1

00 07 07 414/4

00 03 16 414/2

00 20 99 414/1

00 03 12 414/3

00 15 74 414/9

00 34 05

00 08 48 425/1 ए

425/2

10 36

426/4

00 69 428/1बी

00 03 09 428/2

00 13 92 429/5

00 14 44 429/1

00 26 78 429/2

00 06 13 444/2सी

00 42 444/2बी

00 09 20 444/2ए

448/2

00 02 20 ३. कन्डलागुन्टा वेम्मावरम 286

00 28 82 349

00 07 92 357

00 49 28

00 00 12 281/ 1 ए3

00 04 99 281/ 1 ए4

00 00 37 281/ 1 ए5

285/1

00 04 68

00 27 92 285/2

00 26 58 285/3

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (1) (2)

(3) (45)

00 26 62 3. कन्डलागुन्टा 285/4

वेम्मावरम 285/5

00 15 83

84 287/1

(निरंतर)

00 09 287/2

00 10 13 353/4

00 12 50 353/3

00 01 10 354/2

00 31 354/1

00 01 35 355/2

00 04 88 12

4. माचवरम

00 64 54 17

00 64 94 19

00 04 45 87

00 93 46 90

67 32

00 24 50

00 14 68 92

00 21 21 96

00 43 53 97

00 42 128

00 05 27 145

00 47 35

00 27 58 147

148

00 39 34 150

00 16 83

00 24 41 151

403

00 09 02 1/1

00 21 92 1/2

00 08 28

00 06 76 93/1

94/2

00 42 50 98/3

00 08 77 98/1/बी

00 49 48 98/2

00 03 65 149/2

00 15 58

00 18 86 5. नागुलुप्पालपाडु 230

231

00 17 62 2

6. रापरला

00 38 11 3

00 31 08 5

00 55 09 8

00 49 89 9

00 58 25 76

01 16 67 77

00 43 88

28 12 79

00 44 38 3021

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011/चैत्र 26 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1)

(45)

(3)

(2)

(1)

09 29

(3) (45) (2)

00 46 61 62/2

7. अम्मनब्रोलु

4/1

6. रापरला

00 12 4/2

08. 61

72/2

10 91

00 32 18 62/1

(निरंतर)

00 30 94 451/1

182

8. चिरूवनुपालपाड

72/3

74/1

18 81

74/2

75/4

75/6

198

23 90

199

00 27 79 200

राज्य: आंध्र प्रदेश जिला : प्रकाशम

मंडल/तेहसील/

75/7

तालुक : ओन्गोल

7. अम्मनब्रोलु

1. करवदि

00 57 53

00 04 56

00 54 60

47 16

00 65

01 13 378

06 73

382

383

384

3100

388

389

397

398

28 30

399

00 04 400

08 67

402

00 22 403

00 13 50 404

00 28 24 405

422

00 37 425

00 39 63 426

00 26 39 450

01 04 41 452

00 30 453

00 43 64 455

23 86

456

00 59 41 459

00 07 460

00 55 08 1039

00 30 06 62/4

00 34 55 62/3

1217 GI /11-5

01 16 60 120

03 82

126

05 74

128

04 58

129

00 13 गट नंबर 130 में रास्ता

131

00 07 गट नंबर 184 में रास्ता

0551

196

00 02 TI 197

439

440

456/ए

16 51

गट नं. 456/बी में रेलवे ट्रैक

00 17

462

00 02 05 467

496

00 25 623

00 02. 92 गट नं. 624/बी में रेलवे ट्रैक

19 89

630/बी.

00 07 गट नंबर 639 में रास्ता

गट नं. 737 में गुंडलाकम्मानदी

119/1

21 119/2

00 12 61 132/1

00 05 79 134/1 ए

00 03 134/1बी

00 01 04 134/1सी

135/6

00 04 85 137/7

0004 137/6

00 05 140/12

00 21 03 140/1

00 55 63 140/104 3022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

(2)

(1)

(3) (45) 1.करवदि 140/1एउ

00 02 06 145/4

(निरंतर)

00 07 67 185/5

00 03 79 185/4

00 25 83 185/3

00 04 15 185/2

00 38 51 185/1

00 23 83 189/1

00 14 75 189/2

00 14 50 189/4

00 13 72 189/5

00 15 35 190/1

00 01 53 190/2

00 01 03 190/4

00 01 03 190/6

00 02 67 199/1

00 34 15 199/2

00 36 52 199/3

00 21 00 199/4

00 07 69 200/2

00 .04 29 438/1

00 41 34 438/2

00 35 03 441/1

00 44 46 441/2

00 01 93 456/सी/1

00 08 74 456/सी/2

00 02 46 461/1

00 20 62 461/2

00 08 31 463/1

00 21 10 463/3

00 30 41 463/6

00 29 58 466/1

00 02 94 468/1

00 25 08 468/2

00 14 72 468/5

00 22 24 468/6

13 468/7

00 08 10 490/1

00 12 86 490/2

00 05 75

491 /ए

36 08 491/2ए

00 09 88 491/2बी

00 15 47 491/2सी

00 45 25 491/2डी

00 05 73 491/6बी

00 03 71 624/सी/2सी

00 39 88 624/सी/1 ए

00 00 27

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1) (2)

(3) (45) 632/2

1. करवदि

00 62 30 (निरंतर) 635/4सी

10 635/4डी

00 09 04 635/4बी

00 01 69 635/4ई

00 38 11 635/4एफ

00 22 54 635/4जी

00 16 56 641/2

00 39 13 641/3

00 03 32 641/1

00 07 41 642/1

00 41 751/3

00 30 42 751/4

00 33 42 32

2. कोप्पोलु

00 32 75 33

00 29 24 34

00 21 17 40

00 26 26 45

00 21 88 47

00 18 80 48

00 36 65 57

00 27 39 58

00 03 78 61

00 61 11 62

00 33 57 71

00 54 30 गट नंबर 84 में रास्ता

00 02 15 86

00 18 67 87

00 14 30 गट नंबर 69 में रास्ता

00 03 43 90

00 30 15 91

00 15 07 गट नंबर 106 में रास्ता

00 10 93 गट नंबर 111 में रास्ता

00 03 31 112

00 23 18 113

00 21 81

04 86 गट नंबर 113 में मुदीगेंडा एरु 00

416

00 03 39

गट नंबर 416 में नाला

00 82 417

00 05 40 गट नंबर 417 में नाला

00 01 91 423

00 09 39 424

00 34 45 438

00 14 42 454

00 11 29 459

00 07 41 462

00 10 88 गट नंबर 462 में रोड

00 01 90 471

00 14 05 गट नंबर 480 में तलाब

00 00 91 679

00 10 11 3023 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(45)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(45)

(3)

(2)

(1)

00 11 02

475/1बी

00 03 76

00 20 गट नंबर 679 में नाला

475/1सी

2. कोप्पोलु

(निरंतर)

00 18 81

00 42 81

475/1डी

2. कोप्पोलु (निरंतर) 684

00 17 07

00 04 गट नंबर 690 में रास्ता

475/2

00 21 51

476/1

73/1

13 73

00 17 04

476/2

73/2

73/3

477/1

15 47

477/2

74/1

04 42

00 03

74/3

478/1

00 31 61

478/2

85/2

00 12

479/2

92/1

00 05

479/3

92/2

00 77 39

479/4

92/3

03 00

479/1

107/2जी

00 10 08

480/1

107/2एच

05 00

480/3

00 03

107/2आई

00 05 52

480/4

00 02 33 107/2जे

482/1

14 28

108/7

680/1

07 50

108/8

680/2

06 46

00 07 109/6

680/3

00 02 85

00 07 87 109/5

680/4

1500

00 16 58 110/12

680/5

3054

110/11

680/7

110/13

680/6

418/2

जिला : प्रकाशम राज्य : आंध्र प्रदेश

मंडल/तहसील/

11 48

418/1

तालुक : कोत्तपटनम

419/1

00 02 93

425/1

00 65 42

1. अल्लुरू

425/2

00. 31

कोत्तपटनम 10

432/1

00 06 04

00 17 70 432/2

07 92

00 432/3ए

68 39 432/3बी

00 17 16

434/2

00 34

18 49

434/1

24 68

00 02 68

437/1ए

12 10

437/1डी

00 05

437/1एफ

60 36

439/1

00 04 25

01 439/2

00 10

00 439/3

07 26

74 460/8

460/12

00 11 01

14/1

00 07

460/13

71 99

14/2

460/15

14/3बी/ 1

460/11

18 460/16

14/3बी/2

00 04 34

461/1

00 12 50

14/3/1

00 08 95

461/2

02 32

00 25 08

00 463/1

14/3/2

42 463/2

15/1

00 13 16

475/1ए 3024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA26, 1933

(1) (2)

(3) (45) 15/2

1. अल्लुरू

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] (1) (2)

(3) (45)

00 02 26

15/4

कोतपटनम

1. वासेपल्लिपाड्डु 161 / 1 ए।

00 28 99

00 17 21

(निरंतर) 15/5

(निरंतर)

161/12

36 25

00 19 98

36/1

161/13

00 05 85

00 37 93

36/2

161/2

00 17 60

00 32 62

88/1

161/3

00 22

00 47 60

88/2

161/14

00 07 55

00 07 58

मंडल/तहसील/

जिला : प्रकाशम राज्य आंध्र प्रदेश तालुक : टन्गुटूर

1. वासेपल्लिपाड्डु 3

00 01 08 4

00 28 79 17

00 16 45 गट नंबर 202 में रास्ता

00 04 34 253

00 33 22 254

00 07 42 255

162/2

00 13 20 162/1

00 56 48 170/1

00 25 97 170/2

00 07 92 171/1

00 12 24 171/2

00 29 93 191/2

00 18 40 192/1

00 24 61 192/2

00 17 61 192/3

00 21 87

00 20 36

256

201/1

00 61 44

00 20 65

257

00 19 61 258

00 20 19 259

00 20 26 260

00 24 77 261

00 25 25 262

00 38 14 263

00 21 65 266

00 52 6/1

00 76 77 13/2

00 01 17 13/1

00 03 33 15/3

00 27 91 15/2

00 12 04 15/1

00 06 34 18/14

00 12 71 18/11

00 02 90 18/10

00 11 76 18/9

00 01 08 23/3

00 17 89 23/4

00 00 48 24/8

00 15 97 24/7

00 01 27 24/11

00 08 10 24/6

00 01 12 24/1

00 32 59 27/1

00 05 65 27/4

00 07 90 27/5

201/2

00 21 92 203/1

00 11 64 203/2

00 11 32 599

2. वल्लूरू

00 03 31 गट नंबर 599 में नाला

00 04 25 605

00 09 63 गट नंबर 605 में नाला

00 03 87 616

00 21 84 गट नंबर 616 में नाला

00 04 58 गट नंबर 619 में तलाब

00 01 82 गट नंबर 626 में तलाब

00 05 86 628

00 04 10 गट नंबर 628 में नाला

00 07 14 719

00 09 13 गट नंबर 719 में रोड

00 01 63 726

00 25 34 738

00 38 01 746

00 26 60 747

00 00 78 761

00 00 61 गट नंबर 761 में रोड

00 00 10 767

00 05 29 603/3

00 19 93 606/4

00 45 14 606/3

00 05 39 613/1

00 32 28 619/1 बी

00 25 53 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(2)

(1)

(3) ( 45) 619/2

00 05 91

00 15 40 619/3

2. वल्लूरू (निरंतर)

620/1

00 17 41 620/2

00 16 01 620/3

07 35

00 21 25 620/4

00 11 98 626/1

626/2

00 14 87

00 31 83 629/1सी

629/2बी

00 07 39 629/3बी

00 03 18 629/4बी

00 03 13

00 04 88 629/5बी

629/6बी

10 65

00 10 15 641/1

641/2

00 38 26

00 07 64 643/2

09 38

643/4

643/3

00 08 01

00 07 64 648/3

00 09 32 648/4ए

00 10 51 648/5ए

00 08 91 649/1

01 649/4

00 01

00 08 51 649/3ए

00 17 84 649/5ए

00 09.68 649/6ए

00 09 78 649/7ए

14 71

650/4ए

00 12 55 650/5ए

651/3

00 12 27

00 07 97 651/4ए

00 11 45 651/5ए

00 10 652/4ए

98 652/4बी

00 21 62 727/1

32 727/2

00 31 76 727/3

00 00 11 729/3

00 03 59 737/3

00 13 02 739/3

00 12 30 739/4

00 26 06 745/1

3025

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

(2)

(1)

(3) (45)

00 28 68 745/2

2. वल्लूरू

00 01 29 (निरंतर) 751/2

751/1

00 04 96 763/1

00 18 83 763/4

00 15 77 764/1

00 13 94 764/2

00 15 07 764/3

00 24 66 764/4

00 14 18

[फा. सं. एल-14014/31/2009- जी.पी. ]

के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 14thApril , 2011

S. O. 1026. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3090 dated 30th October , 2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for thepurpose of laying Vijayawada- Nellore - Chennai gas pipe- line for transportation of natural gas from on - shore gas processing terminal at Kakinada on East Coast ofAndhra Pradesh of M/ s . Reliance Industries Limitedby M /s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to consumers in various parts of the country;

Andwhereas , the copies of the said Gazette notifica- tion were made available to the public on or before 7th August, 2010;

And whereas , the objections received from the pub- lic to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Government of India;

And whereas , Government of India , after consider- ing the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Govern- ment of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule , appended to this noti- fication, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in M/s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

District:

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk:

State:

Prakasam Andhra Pradesh Naguluppalapadu

Village Survey No./

Area to be acquired Sub-Division No.

forROU

Hec Are C-Are (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) Π

00 01 55 1.Mattigunta

100

00 02 99 101

00 01 35 153

00 11 51 227

00 20 30

228

04 24 229

00 54 94 240

00 07 72 70/21

00 09 47 70/20

00 07 80 70/14

00 20 29 70/13

00 00 53

71/4A1

15 63 76/1

00 39 70 78/1

79/2

00 38 39 79/1

00 13 48 92/ 1C

92/2C

00 00 36 93/1

00 31 89

00 31 81 94/2

94/3

00 05 83 94/1

00 02 04 95/3

00 24 96 95/2

00 16 14 99/3

00 30 08

102/1

00 73 102/2

140/3

35 47 141/14

00 01 32 141/13

00 02 14 141/6

00 04 80 141/5

00 04 29 141/4

00 08 83 141/2

00 05 77

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

00 00 84 1. Mattigunta 144/11

144/12

00 01 43 (Contd.)

144/14

00 03 08 144/15

00 02 86 144/24

00 01 41 144/25

00 06 80 144/26

00 02 20 144/27

00 07 51 144/38

00 06 39 144/3

00 07 76 144/44

00 08 00 144/45

00 04 23 145/ 1B

00 15 44 145/1C

00 02 31 145/16

00 00 22 145/14

00 10 07 145/15

00 03 28 145/13

00 03 46 154/ 1A1

00 18 19 154/1A2

00 02 33 154/2B

230/1

00 11 53 230/2

00 51 46 238/4

00 00 17 238/3

00 25 96 238/2

00 09 19 239/1

00 14 84 239/4

00 25 19 239/3

00 08 06 241/2

00 05 22 241/5

00 11 38 241/6

00 26 10 241/7B1

00 04 16 241/1

00 00 76 241 /7A

00 02 33

00 12 90 2.Uppugundur 272

285

00 11 287

00 09 55 307

00 06 36

00 02 05 Nala inGatNo. 307

00 07 34 CarTrack in Gat No. 320

324

00 06 26 327

331

00 13 05 369

00 04 85 373

00 59 09 3027

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5)

00 13 14

00 37

2.Uppugundur 317 /2B

2.Uppugundur 397

00 04 13

00 05

317/ IC

(Contd.)

(Contd.) Nala in Gat No. 425

06 11

317/2D

427

00 16 88

00 04 85

317/2C

00 38 67

452

00 02 85

317/ 1D

00 19 14

453

30 35

317/3B

00 03 48

454

00 00 98

317/ 1E

00 21 78

252/2B

00 00 48

317/ 1G

00 21 69

252/ 1A3

00 13 10

317/3D

00 02 60

252/ 1B

00 04 64

322/2B

254/5

00 32

07 43

323/2A

254/7

19 81

323/2B

00 08 18

254/8

00 10 35

325/2

00 07 89

254/9

19 25

325/1

00 15 58

254/13

325/3

00 13 54

254/19

00 27 31

332/10

07 08

265/6

00 00 48

335/2

00 21 61

265/5B

372/2

00 09 15 265/5C

00 19 65

00 25 37

00 05 07

378/1

265/5D

00 07

379/1

00 16 44

265/5E

414/4

00 03 16

00 37 65

265/3A

00 20 99

414/2

00 15

265/ 1A

00 03 12

414/1

00 13 64

265/ 1B

414/3

00 12 53

265/ 1C

00 34

414/9

266/1B

00 00 22

425/1A

08 48

267/1

00 10

425/2

00 01 28

267/2

00 69

426/4

00 69 72

283/10

03 09

428/ 1B

00 17 08

284/3

13 92

428/2

00 02 07

286/ 1 /A

429/5

00 14 44

00 02

286/2

00 26 78

429/1

00 27 19

288/3

06 13

429/2

00 10

288/4

444/2C

00 07 83

288/7

00 42 15

444/2B

00 04 50

288/8

00 09 20

444/2A

00 02 19

288/9

00 02 20

448/2

00 15 83

291/1

00 02

291/2

3. Kandlagunta

00 28 82

Vemmevaram 286

00 19 36

312/ 1 / A

00 07 92

349

00 13 01

312/ 1/B

00 49 28

357

00 14 40

312/ 1 /E

00 12

281/ 1A3

00 19 71

312/2/C

00 04 99

281 / 1A4

20 20

312/3 / A

00 00 37

281/ 1A5

00 12 64

312/3/B

285/1

00 05 70

312/3/C

00 27 92

285/2

00 08 56

317/1A 3028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA26, 1933

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

00 26 58 285/3

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 79

00 44 38 6.Raparla

3.Kandlagunta

26 62 Vernmevaram 285/4

00 15 83 285/5

(Contd.)

287/1

00 09 84 287/2

00 10 13 353/4

00 12 50 353/3

00 01 10 354/2

00 31 71

35 354/1

00 01

00 04 355/2

64 4.Machavaram 12

64 94

00 04 45 19

00 93 46 90

00 67 32 91

00 24 50 92

00 14 68 95

00 21 21 96

00 43 53 97

00 42 72 128

00 05 27

00 47 35 145

147

00 27 58 148

00 39

150

16 83 151

00 24 41

00 09 02 403

1/1

00 21 92 1/2

00 08 28

00 06 76 93/1

00 42 94/2

00 08 Π 98/3

00 49 48 98/1/B

98/2

00 03 65 149/2

00 15 58

00 18 86 5. Naguluppa- 230

00 17 62 lapadu 231

00 38 11 6. Raparla

00 31 08 5

00 55 09 8

00 49 89 9

00 58 76

01 16 67

00 43 88 77

00 28 12

00 09 29 (Contd.) 4/1

4/2

00 12 55

72/2

08 61

72/3

10 91 74/1

00 18 56

74/2

18 81

07 47 75/4

75/6

00 19 67

00 10 54 75/7

00 66 75 7. Ammanabrolu 47

57 73 54

00 31 06

00 13 23 55

00 04 05

00 72 57

99 60

00 54 51 61

00 05 00 66

01 47 16 84

00 00 65 378

01 13 77 382

00 06 73

00 27 28 383

384

00 37 44 388

00 31 39 389

00 48 84

397

11 28 398

00 80 45

01 28 30 399

400

00 04 48

00 08 402

403

22 04

00 13 50 404

405

28 24

422

00 08 23 425

00 37 71 426

00 39 63 450

00 26 39 452

01 04 41 453

30 57

455

00 43 64 456

00 23 86 459

00 59 41 460

00 07 85 1039

00 55 08 62/4

00 30 06 3029

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(1)

(5)

(3) (4) (2)

(1)

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

00 07 67 145/4

1.Karavadi

00 34 7. Ammanabrolu 62/3

00 46. 61 62/2

(Contd.)

62/1

451/1

8. Chiruvanup-182

00 48 13 198

palapad

00 23 199

00 27 200

State:

District:

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk :

Andhra Pradesh

Prakasam

Ongole

120

1. Karavadi

00 03 82 126

00 05 74 128

00 04 129

00 13 Car Track in Gat No. 130

00 13 131

00 07 Car Track in Gat No. 184

05 51

196

197

439

440

00 62

456/A

16 51 Railway Track inGat No. 456/B 00

00 00 17 462

00 02 467

496

00 25 623

02 RailwayTrack inGat No.624/B 00

00 19 630/B

00 07 Car Track in Gat No. 639

Gundlakamma River in

00 43 53 GatNo. 737

00 07 04 119/1

00 00 119/2

132/1

134/1A

00 03 04 134/1B

00 01 04. 134/1C

00 88 135/6

00 04 137/7

04 45

137/6

00 05 64 140/1A2

00 21 140/1A1

00 5563 140/ 1A4

00 02 06 140/1A3

1217 GI /11-6

00 03 79 185/5

(Contd.)

00 25 83 185/4

04 15

185/3

185/2

23 83

185/1

14 75

189/1

00 14 50 189/2

189/4

00 15

189/5

190/1

190/2

190/4

190/6

199/1

199/2

21 00

199/3

199/4

200/2

438/1

438/2

00 44 46 441/1

00 01 441/2

08 74

456/C/ 1

456/C/2

00 20 461/1

00 08 31 461/2

21 10

463/1

00 30 463/3

463/6

466/1

25 08

468/1

468/2

22 24

468/5

468/6

00 08 10 468/7

00 12 490/1

00 05 490/2

00 36 491/ 1A

491/2A

15 47

491/2B

491/2C

05 73

491/2D

491/6B

39 88

624/C/2C

624/C/ IA

30.

632/2

635/4C

635/4D

01 69

635/4B

635/4E

00 22 54 635/4F

00 16 56 635/4G 3030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 / CHAITRA 26, 1933

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 1Karavadi 641/2

00 39 13

(Contd.) 641/3

03 32 641/1

00 07 41 642/1

00 41 11 751/3

00 30 42 751/4

00 33 42

00 32 75 2Koppolu 32

00 29 34

00 21 40

00 26 26 45

00 21 88 47

00 18 80 48

00 36 65 57

00 27 39 58

00 03 78 61

00 61 11 62

00 33 57 71

00 54 30 Cart Track in Gat No. 84 00 02 15 86

00 18 67 87

00 14 30 Cart Track inGat No. 69 00 03 43 90

00 30 15 91

00 15 07

Cart Track in Gat No.106

10 93 Cart Track in Gat No.111 00 03 31 112

00 23 18 113

00 21 81 Mudigonda Yeru in

GatNo. 113

00 04 86 416

00 03 39

Nala in Gat No. 416

00 82 417

00 05 40

Nala in Gat No. 417

01 91 423

00 09 39 424

00 34 45 438

00 14 42 454

00 11 29 459

00 07 41 462

00 10 88 Road in Gat No. 462

00 01 90 471

00 14 05 Pond in GatNo. 480

00 00 91 679

00 10 11 Nala in Gat No. 679

00 03 76 684

00 18 81 Cart Track in Gat No. 690 00 17 07 73/1

00 21 51 73/2

00 17 04 73/3

00 17 00 74/1

00 15 47 74/3

00 04 42 85/2

00 31 61 92/1

00 25 63

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 92/2

00 09 09 2.Koppolu

92/3

(Contd.)

00 77 39 107/2G

107/2H

00 04 33 107/21

00 03 13 107/2J

00 02 16 108/7

00 14 28 108/8

00 04 25 109/6

00 06 46 109/5

00 02 85 110/12

00 15 62 110/11

00 00 10 110/13

00 00 16 418/2

00 08 10 418/1

00 11 48 419/1

00 02 91 425/1

00 02 93 425/2

00 02 34 432/1

00 03 68 432/2

00 06 04 432/3A

00 12 22 432/3B

00 08 14 434/2

00 17 16 434/1

00 18 49 437/1A

00 02 68 437/1D

00 12 10 437/1F

00 05 42 439/1

00 60 36 439/2

00 04 25 439/3

00 41 83 460/8

00 07 26 460/12

00 09 91 460/13

00 07 49 460/15

00 07 84 460/11

00 00 49 460/16

00 05 77 461/1

00 04 34 461/2

00 08 95 463/1

00 25 08 463/2

00 34 08 475/1A

00 13 16

475/ 1B

11 02 475/1C

00 20 44 475/1D

00 42 81 475/2

00 04 06 476/1

00 12 37 476/2

00 13 73 477/1

00 00 65 477/2

00 15 30 478/1

00 03 51 478/2

00 08 59 479/2

00 12 15 3031 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(3) (4) (5)

(2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5)

(2)

(1)

00 05

1. Vasepallipadu Cart Track in Gat No. 202 00

479/3

2.Koppolu

00 33

253

(Contd.)

479/4

(Contd.)

00 07 42

07 10

254

479/7

10 08

00 20 36 480/1

255

05 00

00 20 65 480/3

256

00 05

480/4

00 19 61

257

00 02

482/1

20 19

258

00 14 13

680/1

259

00 07 50

680/2

260

00 07

680/3

25 25

261

00 07

680/4

00 38

00 16

262

680/5

00 21

00 30

263

680/7

52 78

680/6

266.

76 77

State:

District

6/1

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk:

Andhra Pradesh

Prakasam

01 17

13/2

Kothapatnam

00 03 33 1.Alluru

13/1

00 65

00 27 91 Kottapatnam 3

15/3

00 31 13

00 12 04

15/2

00 17 70

06 34

15/1

00 12

18/14

00 02 90

18/11

00 11 76 42

18/10

00 78 26

00 01 08

18/9

00 35 30

23/3

77 58

00 00 48

23/4

15 97

24/8

00 01 27

24/7

30 74

24/11

14/1

01 12

77 99

24/6

14/2

00 18 73

14/3B/ 1

00 32 59

24/1

00 18 20

14/3B/2

27/1

00 12 50

14/3A/ 1

00 07 90

27/4

00 02 32

14/34/2

27/5

15/1

161/ 1A1

15/2

00 36 25

00 17

161/ 1A2

15/4

00 19 98

00 05 85 15/5

161/ 1A3

00 37 93

00 17 60 36/1

161/2

00 32 62

36/2

161/3

00 47 60

88/1

07 55

161/1A4

00 07

88/2

00 13 20

162/2

State:

District

Mandal/ Tehsil/Taluk :

00 56 48

162/1

Andhra Pradesh

Prakasam

Tangutur

00 25 97

170/1

00 01 08

07 1.Vasepallipadu 3

170/2

00 28 79

171/1

17 3032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

00 29 93 171/2

1. Vasepallipadu

(Contd.) 191/2

00 18 40 192/1

00 24 61 192/2

00 17 61 192/3

00 21 87 201/1

00 61 44 201/2

00 21 92 203/1

00 11 64 203/2

00 11 32 599

2.Valluru

00 03 31

Nala inGat No. 599

04 25 605

00 09 63 Nala in Gat No. 605

00 03 87 616

00 21 84

Nala in Gat No. 616

04 58

Pond in Gat No. 619

01 82

Pond in Gat No. 626

05 86 628

00 04 10 Nala in Gat No. 628

00 07 14 719

00 09 13

Road in Gat No. 719

01 63 726

00 25 34 738

00 38 01 746

00 26 60 747

00 00 78 761

61 Road in Gat No. 761

767

00 05 29 603/3

00 19 93 606/4

00 45 14 606/3

00 05 39 613/1

00 32 28 619/1B

00 25 53 619/2

00 05 91 619/3

00 15 40 620/1

00 17 41 620/2

00 16 01 620/3

00 07 35 620/4

00 21 25 626/1

00 11 98 626/2

00 14 87 629/ 1C

00 31 83 629/2B

00 07 39 629/3B

00 03 18

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii )] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 2. Valluru 629/4B

00 03 13 629/5B

(Contd.)

00 04 88 629/6B

00 10 65 641/1

00 10 15 641/2

00 38 26 643/2

00 07 64 643/4

00 09 38 643/3

00 08 01 648/3

00 07 64 648/4A

00 09 32 648/5A

00 10 51 649/1

00 08 91 649/4

00 01 01 649/3A

00 08 51 649/5A

00 17 84 649/6A

00 09 68 649/ 7A

00 09 78 650/4A

00 14 71 650/5A

00 12 55 651/3

00 12 27 651/4A

00 07 97 651 /5A

00 11 45 652/4A

00 10 49 652/4B

00 00 98 727/1

00 21 62 727/2

00 32 90 727/3

00 31 76 729/3

00 00 11 737/3

00 03 59 739/3

00 13 02 739/4

00 12 30 745/1

00 26 06 745/2

00 28 68 751/2

00 01 29 751/1

00 04 96 763/1

00 18 83 763/4

00 15 77 764/1

00 13 94 764/2

00 15 07 764/3

00 24 66 764/4

00,

14 18

[F. No. L- 14014/31 /2009-GP. ] K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy.

3033

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 14 अप्रैल , 2011

आशय की घोषणा की थी ; का.आ. 1027.-भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 3091 तारीख 30 अक्तूबर, 2009 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर काकीनाडा स्थित अपतटीय गैस प्रसंस्करण टर्मिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा विजयवाडा- नेल्लोर - चेन्नई गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने और, उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 9 अगस्त, 2010 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में , जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्ञात कर दिया गया ;

और , भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्तः शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: टन्गुटूर

जिला: प्रकाशम राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश गांव का नाम

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल

सर्वेसं/सब डिविजन सं.

हेक्टेयर एयर सि एयर

(3) (4) (5)

(2)

(1)

1. वल्लूरू कावलिमान्यम 11 00 09 70 गट नंबर 11 में रोड 00 01 54

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

01 42

गट नं 32 में रेलवे

1. वल्लूरू कावलिमान्यम 16 (निरंतर)

00 25 16

ट्रैक

01 28

3/7

09 53

4/2

00 10

4/3

4/8

4/6

4/5

14/2

22 83

14/3

29/1

25 12

29/2

00 10 45

30/3बी

16 62

30/2

33/5

33/6

33/4

33/2

33/1

2. तूरूपुनायुडुपालेम

00 23

383

3. टन्गुटूर

384

386

389

24 11

390

00 09

394

00 31 18

397

27 88

399

03 26

402

00 69 45

404

406

412

00 01

414

416

417

520

00 17

553 3034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 555

3. टन्गुटूर (निरंतर)

00 71

418/1

3. टन्गुटूर (निरंतर)

00 61 59 556

00 17 58

519/4

00 15 84 557

00 21

582/1

00 38 44 558

00 02 25

582/2

11 559

00 60 26

1380/2

00 14 76 562

00 18 36

1416/2

00 12 50 577

00 01 13

1416/1

00 25 15 578

00 19 73

जिला : प्रकाशम

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक : जरूगुमल्लि

581

00 08 05

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश 583

08 01

1. वाविलेटिपाडु

00 40 51 584

43 57 585

00 00 51

00 03 59 1363

00 28 32

00 43 09 1373

50 94

00 48 23 1374

00 31

13 गट नं. 1374में

100

52 तलाब

00 07 78

254

14 98 1378

00 14 72

256

00 32 97 1381

00 59

257

00 09

67 1383

00 19 57

258

00 39 13 1387

22 91

269

23 1388

00 13

87/2

00 00 25 1389

12 71

87/1

66 1390

00 07 84

360

2. के. बिटागुन्टा

00 03 03 1408

01 99

361

35 69 1409

00 03 94

362

00 48 23 1410

00 00 85

363

03 59 1417

00 01

364

00 42 21 1418

00 38 04

372

00 03 45 1425

374

00 20 84 1447

00 05 88

375

00 20 53 1449

23 60

387

1450

26 00

63 21

645

1465

03 03

08 11

652

1484

00 52 68

03 95

653

गट नं. 1487 और

31 23 354में नदी 01 06

682

29 403/1

00 19 90

381/2

00 00 75 403/2

00 00 55

381/3

15 67 407/3

00 28 86

385/4

49 46 418/2

385/2

00 05 56 3035 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र26 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(5)

जिला : प्रकाशम (3) (4)

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: सिंगरायकोन्डा

(2)

(1)

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

385/3

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

(1)

00 96

389/1

2. के. बिटागुन्टा (निरंतर)

30 09

00 27 77 00

293

389/2

1. कलिकिवाया

294

647/1

15 43

375

651/2बी 1

45 TI

379

651/1बी 2

00 50

382

81 32

651/2ए

383

55 458

00 03

384

3. जरूगुमल्लि

381/1

474

381/2

04 47

475

00 01

00 28

2. कनुमल्ला

483

00 01

2/1

गट नं. 339 और

00 21

2/2

487 में पालरू

00 73

जिला : प्रकाशम नदी

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: कन्दुकूर

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

00 20

476/1

63 19

729

00 01

476/2

1. पलुकूर

00 04 25

759

477/2

760

08 69

477/3

762

00 38

276

4. नन्दनवनम

00 26

764

279

95 54

766

354

06 30

-00

767

00 17

768

365

09 00

गट नं. 779 में 00

367

कोमती गुंटा

369

00 09

781

00 01

372

00 53

782

373

00 04

783

374

05 60

गट नं. 783 में

390

तलाब

00 73

00 88 04

787

397

49 43

362/5

788

00 17

790

362/6

00 20

791

362/3

08 81

792

00 06 11

364/1

1057

364/2

1058

00 09

366/1

00 03

1061

00 64 18

393/1

23 09

727/2

00 63

393/4 3036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 / CHAITRA 26, 1933

(1) (1)

(5)

(2)

(3) (4)

728/1

00 29 37

1. पलुकूर (निरंतर)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

(3)

(2)

(4) (5) 93/2

00 43 08

2. ओगूरू ( निरंतर)

21 44

728/2

728/3

00 12 26

779/1

00 03 60

779/2

00 02 00

780/1

780/2डी

00 46 31

786/5

00 46 30

1063/3

00 18 10

00 30 42

2. ओगूरू

00 74 53

35 45

00 21

00 02 13

00 26 49

105

24 87

111

00 00 10

127

128

00 67 28

129

00 54 04

163

00 61 16

174

00 07 71

00 01 38

421

28/2

00 00 94

40/4

00 12 89

00 04 22

42/3

42/2

42/1

70/2

00 06 81

94/2

15 27 94/1

00 06 28 100/3सी

00 40 83 100/3बी

00 01 67 100/1

00 02

112/1

00 07 47 112/2

00 14 25

06 112/3

00 14

113/3

27 86

113/2

12 94 113/1

114/3

14 50

114/4

14 55 114/2

00 00

115/1

17 80

115/2

20 75

00 00

116/1

135/3

135/2

76 135/1

162/2

00 23 49 162/3

00 21 34 162/4

00 16 88

173/1

33 46

00 39

173/2बी

29 173/4

173/5

00 51 24 422/1

00 04 97

422/2

00 13

1536

48 69

3. कन्दुकूर

00 10 85

70/1

00 44 82

81/1

00 09 55

81/3

81/4

21 74

81/5

10 16

81/6

82/1

00 14

00 55

90/2

93/3

1537

01 17

00 18 29 1538

1572

00 24 33

00 02 71 1573

1574

00 21 13

1579

04 52

75 55 1580

08 1582

1587

73 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

29 43

3037

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

381

1. आत्माकूरू ( निरंतर )

1597

3. कन्दुकूर ( निरंतर )

1598/3

1598/2

1598/1

1739/3

00 04

4. दोन्डपाडु

00 32

4/4

4/5ए।

4/12

4/10

4/9ए

4/11

4/9बी

4/3बी

4/3ए

4/3सी

गट नं 131 में

5. पालूर

रास्ता 132

163

00 03

431

2/4

2/5

3/1

9/3

9/5

10/1

10/2

10/3

12/1

12/2

12/3

19/1

19/2

22/3

22/4

22/5

22/6बी

22/8

22/7

00 20

22/12

377/1

428/1

गट नंबर 267 में 00

2. भीमवरम

173

180

182

185

187

133/1

133/2

164/2

164/1

169/1

जिला: प्रकाशम

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक : उलवपाडु

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

1. आत्माकूरू

00 54

378

1217 GI /11-7

मन्नेरु नदी

271

272

273

277

286

303

304

305

गट नंबर 305 में 00

लच्छी गुंटा

306

308

309

276/1 3038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] (1)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 276/2

2भीमवरम (निरंतर)

00 13 81

590

3. बददेपूडी ( निरंतर )

00 39 31 284/1

00 00 44

17/2

00 17 95 285/2

75 48

17/3

12 63 285/1

23/1

00 33 45 22

3. बददेपूडी

23/2

00 68

00 00

47/2

32 78

37 63

368/1

369/1

04 89

369/6

00 42 31

00 49

412/1

00 24 00 45

412/2

00 08 47 46

00 07 84

मंडल/तहसील/तालुक: गुडलूर

जिला : प्रकाशम

00 09 12

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश 49

00 33 71

1. कोत्तपेटा

252

00 18 33 51

12 06

253

00 14 61 73

00 00 83

गट नंबर 253 में 00 02 17 74

00 04 75

नाला

00 09

254

05 80

00 51

255

ΟΙ

04 12

00 36

256

24 75

276

00 03 03

00 09 80

277

17 358

00 06 00

278

74 359

22 14

279

360

01 51 00

719

361

2. गुडलूर

05 06 00

42 96

725

367

12 40 00 62 70

374

729

00 12 78 00 13 37

834

375

93 34

13 25

837

376

45 00

12 84

840

-392

39 58

44 23

842

396

00 00

29 56

867

397

83 19

21 85

868

398

00 31 82

401

895

02 59 00 04 91

404

896

00 93 00 21 89

81 406

897

00 35 90

09 84 407

918

00 45 52 411

00 24 05

926

11 27 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

724/4

2.गुडलूर (निरंतर )

3039

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

138

147

3. अम्मवारी पालेम

(निरंतर)

724/9

724/5

724/1

00 02

724/6

724/7

00 09

839/ 1 ए

00 02

839/1बी

839/2

839/3ए

00 09

839/4बी

839/3बी

839/4ए

00 15

866/1

00 18

866/2

24 23

866/3

00 05

873/2ए

00 18

873/2बी

873/2सी

00 00

909/1

00 54 91

914/1

915/4

00 08 27

915/5

00 09

915/6

915/7

07 :63

915/1

00 08

915/2

08 38

915/3

3. अम्मवारी पालेम

00 13

00 43

00 06

57 16

00 39

107

00 50

131

137

99 228

229

231

01 13

243

244

4/1

00 13

4/2

17 4/3

4/4

4/5

00 02

4/6

7/3

7/11

7/5

03 38

12/1

00 05 43 12/2

07 80

12/3

12/4

12/5

12/6

21/1

21/2

21/3

21/4

00 07

21/5

00 00

21/7

21/8

04 89

21/9

04 47

21/10

00 03 95 40/1

00 22 21 40/2

25 30

41/1

41/2

08 17

41/3

00 02 96 43/1

46/4 1040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 46/5

00 04 56

233/1

00 01 45 46/7

3. अम्मवारी पालेम निरंतर)

3. अम्मवारी पालेम (निरंतर)

00 05 01

233/2

00 05 24 46/8

00 01 62

235/2

00 03 86 46/9

16 00

[फा. सं. एल-14014/31/2009- जी.पी. ] 48/1

00 01 60

के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव 48/2

00 01 07

New Delhi, the 14th April, 2011 48/3

00 91

56/3

00 11 00

56/4

00 08 27

56/11

00 11 97

57/5

00 03 23

57/4

00 02 59

57/10

57/11

00 11 89

79/3

00 22 42

79/2

00 03 58

80/3

00 02 82

S.O. 1027.- Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3091 dated 30th October, 2009 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act),Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Vijayawada - Nellore - Chennai gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from on - shore gas processing terminal at Kakinada on East Coast ofAndhra Pradesh of M/s. Reliance Industries Limited by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;

80/4

00 09 66

97/2

00 13 70

97/6

00 01 87

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 9th August, 2010 ;

97/3

98/2

00 06 91

98/3

And whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

00 35 76

100/1

00 39 35

102/11

00 58 93

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;

106/2

07 53

106/11

00 08 11

106/12

00 03 24

And whereas , Government of India , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

106/15

00 07 44

106/3

00 11 65

133/1

37 87

133/3

00 26 53

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred bysub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

133/2

00 01

133/8

00 01 70

136/3

00 20 57

136/2

00 04 04

136/1

00 26 57

230/1

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India , vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, free from all encumbrances .

07 41 3041

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(1) SCHEDULE

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

406

3.Tangutur (Contd)

District : Prakasam

State :Andhra Pradesh

Mandal/Tehsil/ Taluk: Tangutur

Survey No./

Village

Area to be acquired for ROU

Sub-Division

Are C-Are

Hec

No.

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

.00 09

RoadinGat

1. Valluru Kavali- maniyam

No. 11

RailwayTrack

inGat No. 32 00

3/7

4/2

4/3

0400

4/8

4/6

4/5

14/2

22 83

14/3

29/1

29/2

30/3B

30/2

33/5

33/6

33/4

33/2

33/1

2. Turupu Nayudu- 78

palem

383

3. Tangutur

00 36

384

386

389

390

394

397

399

402

404

412

414

416

417

520

553

555

556

557

558

559

18 36

562

577

578

581

583

584

585

1363

1373

1374

Pond In Gat

No. 1374

1378

1381

1383

1387

1388

1389

1390

1408

1409

1410

1417

38 04

1418

1425

1447

1449

1450 3042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 1465

3.Tangutur (Contd)

00 08 11

645

00 03 03 1484

00 03 95

2. K. Bitragunta (Contd)

652

00 52 68 RiverIn Gat

653

00 31 23 No. 1487& 354 01 06 72

682

29 403/1

00 19 90

381/2

00 00 403/2

00 00 55

381/3

00 407/3

15 67

00 28 86

385/4

00 418/2

385/2

418/1

00 05

00 61

519/4

385/3

00 15 84

17 86

389/1

00 00 582/1

00 38 44

389/2

00 30 09 582/2

11 41

647/1

1380/2

1416/2

651/2B1

00 25 60

12 50

1416/1

651/ 1B2

00 07 41

651/2A

00 81 32 Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Zarugumalli District : Prakasam State:

Andhra Pradesh

458

3. Zarugumalli

00 05 65 90

1. Vaviletipadu

00 40 51

474

36 91

00 43

475

00 04

47 94

00 03 59

483

00 28 17 97

00 43 09

Palaru River in

00 48 23

GatNo. 339

12 13

and 487

00 73 67 100

00 06 52

476/1

00 20 254

00 14 98

476/2

256

21 00 32 97

477/2

257

258

477/3

08 69 269

4. Nandanavanam

276

25 23

38 84 87/2

279

00 25

00 08 20 87/1

354

16 88 360

2. K. Bitragunta

00 03 03

365

00 35 89 361

00 35 69

367

64 51 362

00 48 23

369

00 36 92 363

00 03 59

372

00 01 62 364

00 42 21

373

53 372

00 03 45

374

00 65 01 374

00 20 84

390

00 55 63 375

00 20 53

397

73 69 387

00 26 20

362/5

16 56 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011/चैत्र 26 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(3)

(5)

(1)

(4)

(1)

362/6

17 00 4. Nandanavanam

3043

(4)

(2)

(3)

(5)

787

88 04

1.Palukur ( Contd.)

362/3

37 (Contd.)

364/1

00 06 11

97 364/2

00 50

366/1

00 64 18 393/1

393/4

00 63 80

District : Prakasam

Mandal/Tehsil/

State: Andhra Pradesh Taluk: Singarayakonda

293

00 27 77 1. Kalikivaya

72 294

375

00 15 43

00 45

379

382

50 98

00 31 64 383

03 55

384

381/1

24 82

23 381/2

2. Oguru.

20 1

2. Kanumalla

2/1

00 01 93 2/2

District : Prakasam

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Kandukur

State: Andhra Pradesh

00 63 19 1. Palukur

729

759

00 04 25 760

01 20 37 762

00 11

26 25 764

766

00 95 54 767

768

00 17

Komati Gunta 00

in Gat No. 779

09 24

781

00 53 28 782

00 04

783

00 05 60 Pond inGat

No. 783

788

00 49 43

00 09 16 790

00 06 88 791

81 792

1057

99 58 1058

70 1061

00 23 09 727/2

728/1

00 29 37

00 21

44 728/2

00 12

728/3

60 779/1

00 03

00 779/2

00 65 62 780/1

780/2D

30 786/5

00 46

00 18 10 1063/3

30 42

00 74 53 29

00 35

00 21 80 71

00 02 13 77

00 46 34 78

26 49

00 05 82 98

105

24 87

111

07 13

00 00 10 127

128

67 28

54 04 129

00 61 16 163

174

07 71 421

00 01 38

00 00 94 28/2

40/4

12- 89 42/3

00 04 22 42/2

00 30 97 42/1

00 16

81 70/2

00 06 3044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA 26 , 1933

(2)

(4)

(1)

(3)

(5)

(1) 70/1

10 85

3.Kandukur 2. Oguru ( Contd.)

81/1

(Contd.)

00 44

81/3

00 09 55

81/4

81/5

09 92

81/6

00 10

82/1

00 14 19

90/2

93/3

93/2

00 43 08

00 15

94/2

94/1

00 06 28

100/3सी

40 83

100/3बी

00 01 67

02 25

100/1

4. Dondapadu

112/1

00 07

14 25

112/2

112/3

113/3

00 27 86

113/2

00 07 51

113/1

14 50

114/3

114/4

00 14

00 00

114/2

115/1

17 80

115/2

00 20

116/1

00 20 79

135/3

135/2

135/1

162/2

5. Palur

00 21 34

162/3

162/4

173/1

00 39

173/2बी

00 08 78

173/4

173/5

00 51 24

422/1

00 04

422/2

00 00 13

00 48

1536

3. Kandukur

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (2)

(3) (4) (5) 1537

00 01 17 1538

00 18 29 1572

00 24 33

1573

02 71

00 21

1574

13 1579

00 04 52 1580

00 75 55

1582

1587

00 29

1597

00 04

1598/3

1598/2

22 27

1598/1

94 1739/3

00 24 59 2

00 04 31 8

00 32 97

00 33 07 9

00 63 66

34 01

4/4

00 00 46 4/5ए1

4/12

16 93 4/10

00 01 22

4/9ए

4/11

05 4/9बी

00 04

07 16 4/3बी

00 09 07 4/3ए

12 70

4/3सी

00 28 59 CartTrack in

00 05 56 GatNo. 131

132

00 00 10

163

173

32 15

180

17 02

182

185

06 59

34 38 187

133/1

01 79 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1) (1)

00 16 20

133/2

3045

(3) (4) (5) (2)

286

2. Oguru ( Contd.)

5. Palur ( Contd.)

00 02

164/2

00 30

164/1

00 89 73

169/1

District : Prakasam

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Ulavapadu

State:Andhra Pradesh

22 26

1. Atmakuru

00 54

00 65 45

00 13 78

378

381

00 03 30

431

00 95 86

2/4

2/5

25 70

00 78 91 303

304

00 03

305

Lachi Gunta

14 43 inGat No. 305 00

306

00 27

308

00 80 82 309

276/1

00 13

276/2

44 284/1

285/2

285/1

00 68

3. Baddepudi

3/1

17 33

9/3

00 29 30

9/5

08 31

10/1

00 13

10/2

10/3

00 04

12/1

12/2

21 64

12/3

19/1

19/2

22/3

00 21

00 94

22/4

00 14

22/5

10 26

22/6B

22/8

22/7

20 29

22/12

00 13

377/1

00 58

428/1

Manneru River

2. Bhimavaram

inGatNo. 267 00

33 85

271

272

273

00 22 28

277

1217 GI /11-8

00 04 89 29

00 49

00 42 59 45

00 07

00 09

00 83

04 75

36 57

24 75

358

00 22

359

360

42 96

361

367

00 13

374

375

12 84

376

392 3046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) 396

00 29 56

00 31 82

2. Gudlur (Contd.) 868

397

3. Baddepudi (Contd.)

00 21 85

895

00 02 59 398

00 00 95

896

00 93 81 401

00 04 91

897

00 09 84 404

00 21 89

918

00 45 52 406

00 35 90

926

00 11 27 407

00 35

724/4

00 02 07 411

00 24 05

724/9

00 00 19 590

00 39 31

724/5

00 02 74 17/2

00 17 95

724/1

00 08 60 17/3

00 12 63

724/6

00 02 07 23/1

00 33 45

724/7

00 01 42 23/2

00 00 84

839/ 1A

00 09 45 47/2

00 32 78

839/1B

00 02 49 368/1

00 23 68

839/2

00 13 14 369/1

24 27

839/3A

12 369/6

00 42 96

839/4B

00 09 64

412/1

24 00

839/3B

02 64 412/2

00 08 47

839/4A

00 07 69

866/1

Mandal /Tehsil/Taluk : Gudlur

15 68 District: Prakasam

866/2

State:Andhra Pradesh

00 18 48 252

866/3

24 1. Kothapeta

00 18 33

253

873 /2A

14 61

873/2B

00 Nala in Gat

18 22

873 /2C

00 27 67

No. 253

02 17

909/1

00 254

00 57

00 05 80

914/1

54 91 255

ΟΙ

915/4

00 256

08 75

26 10

915/5

276

08 27

03 03

915/6

277

09 09

278

915/7

00 09

915/1

279

00 01

00 07 63

915/2

719

00 2. Gudlur

08 45

05 06 34

915/3

00 725

08 38

00 12 40

3. Ammavari Palem 1

00 729

834

00 93 34

837

00 45

28 840

00 00 43

842

06 09 867

00 83

00 46 25 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल16 , 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

3047

(4) (5)

(3)

(2)

46/7

01 62

46/8

3.Ammavari Palem.

(Contd.)

107

3.Ammavari Palem (Contd.)

131

137

00 31

138

147

00 00

228

229

231

243

244

4/1

13 88

4/2

4/3

4/4

00 07

4/5

4/6

7/3

7/11

7/5

00 03

12/1

00 05 43

12/2

00 07

12/3

06 34

12/4

12/5

12/6

23 26

21/1

21/2

06 93

21/3

21/4

07 49

21/5

21/7

04 02

21/8

00 04

21/9

21/10

40/1

00 22

40/2

41/1

00 13

41/2

00 08

41/3

43/1

00 14 30

46/4

46/5

46/9

48/1

00 01

48/2

48/3

56/3

56/4

56/11

00 03

57/5

02 59

57/4

00 09

57/10

00 11

57/11

00 22

79/3

79/2

80/3

80/4

00 13

97/2

97/6

97/3

98/2

98/3

100/1

58 93

102/11

106/2

00 08

106/11

106/12

07 44

106/15

00 11

106/3

00 37

133/1

26 53

133/3

133/2

01 70

133/8

20 57

136/3

136/2

26 57

136/1

00 07

230/1

01 45

233/1

00 05 24 233/2

00 03 86 235/2

[F. No. L- 14014/31/2009-GP. ] K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

3048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S.E. Railway and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17-3-2011 .

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय (खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशालय ) धनबाद , 2 फरवरी , 2011

[No. L-41012/57/2006- IR(B - I)] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT:

का. आ. 1028. मैं, मुख्य खान निरीक्षक जिन्हें खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशक के रूप में भी पदनामित किया गया है , खान अधि नियम, 1952 की धारा (6 ) की उप- धारा ( 3 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों के तहत दिनांक 15-11-2009 को भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II के खण्ड ( 3 ) के उप- खण्ड ( ii ) में प्रकाशित दिनांक6-11-2009 (एस-29022/1/2009-सामान्य/3423 ) के का.आ. सं. 3177 का आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए एतद्वारा मध्य प्रदेश के सिंगरौली जिला को वाराणसी क्षेत्र के अन्तर्गत समाविष्ट किये जाने की घोषणा करता हूं।

Shri J. Srivastava, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T. - cum-Labour Court , Bhubaneswar

Industrial Dispute Case No. 9/2007 [सं. एस-29022/ 1/2009 - सामान्य/ 555 ] सतीश पुरी , मुख्य खान निरीक्षक एवं खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशक

Date ofPassing Award-8th March, 2011

BETWEEN :

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT (Directorate-General of Mines Safety)

Dhanbad, the 2nd February, 2011

TheManagement of the Divisional Railway Manager(Engineering) S.E. Railway, Chakradharpur , Distt. Singhbhum (East), Singhbhum 1st Party -Management

AND

Their workman Shri Champana Bairagi , Qr. No. T3 /6 , Railway Colony, At/P.O. Kalunga, Distt . Sundargarh

2nd Party-Workman

APPEARANCES :

S.O. 1028. In exercise of the powers conferred on the Chief Inspector of Mines also designated as Director General of Mines Safety under sub - section ( 3 ) of Section (6) of the Mines Act, 1952, I, hereby modify the S.O. No. 3177dated 6-11-2009 (S- 29022/ 1 /2009 - Genl/ 3423 ) published in Part II , Section (3 ), Sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette ofIndia dated 15-11-2009 and declare that Singrauli District of the State of Madhya Pradesh shall be within thejurisdiction of Varanasi Region .

Shri C. B. Jena , Chief Law Assistant

: For the 1st Party- Management

[No. S-29022/ 1 /2009/Genl/555 ] SATISH PURI , Chief Inspector of Mines and Director General ofMines Safety None

:For the 2nd Party- Workman

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

AWARD

का. आ. 1029.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दक्षिण-पूर्व रेलवी के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour has referred an industrial dispute existing between the employers in relation to the Management of South Eastern Railway, Chakradharpur and their workman in éxercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 -A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide their letter No. L - 41012/ 57 /2006 - IR ( B - 1 ) dated 12-2-2007 .

[सं. एल -41012/57/2006- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

2. The matter under dispute is mentioned under the Schedule of the letter of reference which reads as under :

S.O. 1029.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 9/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the

"Whether the action of the management of S.E. Railway, Chakradharpur, Distt . Singhbhum by not sanctioning leave from 7-3-2006 to 11-3-2006 and not allowing duty from 12-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 to Shri Champana Bairagi , Senior Trackman , Gang 3049 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

No. 70, Kalunga is justified and the demand of the workınan for full back wages for the above period is justified ? Ifnot , what relief the workman is entitled to?"

5.Onthe points of dispute issues were framed in the case. But the 2nd Party- workman chose to remain absent on later dates . Hence the case was set ex parte against him on 1-12-2008 .

6. The 1st Party - Management examined Shri Debabrata Mandal as M.W. - 1 and filed certain documents marked as Exts . - 1 , 2 and 2/1 . Some other documents filed by the 1st Party- Management have not been proved and exhibited . The 2nd Party- workman has also filed certain documents as part of his statement of claim , but those documents have not proved and marked exhibits . As such they cannot be read in evidence .

3.The 2nd Party - workman in pursuance of the letter ofreference has filed his statement of claim in which he has statedthat he went to his village on 7-3-2006 to bring back his school going children for appearing in annual examination after submitting leave application on 6-3-2006 for sanction of leave from 7-3-2006 to 11-3-2006 before Shri Debabrata Mandal , Junior Engineer - II , P. W.I. , Kalunga.He again sent a leave application through E- Post to Mr. J. Sahu , the Section Engineer just after reaching his village Chhatrapur on 8-3-2006 apprehending the mischievous and vindictive nature of Shri Mandal . On coming back to Kalunga he went to attend his duty on 12-3-2006 , but Shri Debabrata Mandal , Junior Engineer- II , P.W.I. did not allow him to join duty and also denied of having received any leave application of the 2nd Party - workman on 6-3-2006 . Then the 2nd Party - workman wrote another leave application on 12-3-2006 for sanction of five days leave and handed it over to Shri Mandal, but he forwarded it with certain remarks and post dated it on 16-3-2006 instead of 12-3-2006 with intention to harass him . When he was not allowed to join his duty, he approached the higher authorities . On being refused employment he brought the matter to the notice of the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ), Rourkela. Subsequently he was reinstated and thenhe joined his duties on 17-5-2006. But he was not paid wages for the period from 7-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 . Therefore, prayer is made to release the wages for the period from 7-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 alongwith service benefits .

7. The 2nd Party- Workman has to prove his case pertaining to claim of wages for the alleged period of leave from 7-3-2006 to 11-3-2006 and also for the period from 12-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 when he was disallowed to attend hisduties by the 1st Party -Management . But he has not produced any evidence in support of his claim . The documents filed by him in themselves do not go to prove his case as they are either in the shape of xerox copies or type written . Their genuinity cannot be presumed for want of proof as the 1st Party - Management has denied the submission of various applications of leave on the dates mentioned therein as alleged by the 2nd Party- workman . On the countrary the oral evidence of M.W. - 1 . Shri Debabrata Mandal goes to show that the 2nd Party- workman had not given him any leave application on 6-3-2006 and he remained absent from 7-3-2006 to 15-3-2006 without any leave application . On 16-3-2006 the 2nd Party- workman came to this witness for work and then gave him an application for leave from 7-3-2006 to 11-3-2006 only, but has not applied for any leave from 12-3-2006 to 15-3-2006 . He forwarded his applicationto his higher authority for sanction. He did not allow him to join duty on 16-3-2006 as his higher authority had not passed any order permitting the 2nd Party- workman to joinhis duty. Thereafter the 2nd Party - workman did not report for duty, though he was informed to join duty vide Ext. 1 and Ext. 2/1 . Meanwhile the 2nd Party- workman raised an industrial dispute before the Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( Central ) and during the conciliation proceeding he was permitted to join duties on 17-5-2006 . Thus the 2nd Party - workman has remained absent from duty from 7-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 and , therefore , he is not entitled to any wages for the above period .

8. The ex parte evidence led by the Ist Party- Management virtually establishes the fact that the 2nd Party -workman has remained absent unauthorizedly and without prior senction of leave from 7-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 . As such he cannot claim any wages for the period of unauthorized absence from duty . Therefore , it is held that the action of the Management of S.E. Railway , Chakradharpur, Distt. Singhbhum is justifed and well within his right in disallowing the 2nd Party - workman to wages 4. The 1st Party - Management has denied all the allegations in their written statement and stated that the 2nd Party -workman has not submitted any application for leave on 6-3-2007 to Shri Mandal . Shri Mandal was not the leave sanctioning authority of the 2nd Party - workman. He should have got his leave sanctioned from the competent authority, i.e. Mr. J. Sahu before leaving the headquarters . Mr. Sahu was present at the headquarters on 6-3-2007 and 7-3-2007. The E- Post was received by the addressee on 17-3-2006 after arrival of the 2nd Party - workman . The application dated 12-3-2006 was actually submitted on 16-3-2006 to Shri Mandal and then to Shri Sahu which was forwarded on the same date . The 2nd Party - workman is a habitual absentee and remains absent without any information /authority in most of the days of a month . He did notjoin his duties even after Shri Mohapatra sent two staff members at his residence with a letter on 29-4-2006 which he refused to receive . He was again sent a registered letter on 4-5-2006 advising him to join duty which was also refused by him . Thus the 2nd Party- workman had remained absent from duty un - authorizedly from 7-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 . Therefore , he is not entitled for any wages for the period of his absence .

3050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 / CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

BETWEEN :

for the period from 7-3-2006 to 16-5-2006 and not allowing him to join his duty without sanction of leave from 12-3-2006 to 16-5-2006.

Avula Lingaiah , (EC No. 2597192) , S/o Ellaiah, 9. The reference is answered accordingly.

aged about 50 years , Ex-CoalFiller at MK -4 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited,

Dictated and Corrected by me .

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri ,

Adilabad Distt.

J. SRIVASTAVA , Presiding Officer

Petitioner नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2011

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its General Manager, Mandamarri Area , Mandamarri, Adilabad District .

2. The Dy. General Manager,

का. आ. 1030.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 38/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

MK-4 Incline, Singareni Collieries Company Limted , Mandamarri Area , Mandamarri , Adilabad Distt.

Respondents [सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri P.A.V.V.S. Sarma on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides, the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 S.O. 1030. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( LCID No. 38 / 2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was receivedbythe Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L- 22013 / 1 /2011 - IR(C - II ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE IN THE LOK ADALAT

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses (a) to ( g ) ] , the contents of which are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January , Two Thousand and Eleven

In agreement of the above , the parties/ counseave affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat, Bench .

PRESENT:

Sd/-

Sd/- 1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

Signature of Applicant (s) Signature of Respondent ( s) Sd/-

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

Signature of Counsel for Applicant (s) Sd/-

(Constituted U/s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186 / LSA/2006, dt . 22-08-2006)

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s )

Inthe matter of case LCID No. 38/2008 PLAC 8/2011

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench .

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad) 3051 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26 , 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

Note : This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2 ) ofthe LSAAct, 1987 .

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO, Presiding Officer

अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 37/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013 / 1 / 2011- आई आर ( सी -11 )| डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

New Delhi , the 18th March, 2011 LCID No. 38/2008

Proposals of the management :

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

S.O. 1031.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 37/ 2009 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L-22013/ 1 /2011 - IR(C- II ) | D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer (a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

ANNEXURE IN THE LOK ADALAT

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum-Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

PRESENT :

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment as Badli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed.

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/s 19 of the LSA Act , 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/ LSA/2006 ,dt. 22-08-2006) (e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short fall of attendance during the 3 months period , the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

Inthe matter of case LCID No. 37/2009

PLAC 7/2011

(On the file ofCGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad) (f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents/natural disease , treatment taken at Company'sHospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period .

BETWEEN :

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh .

Petitioner

Kotha Srinivas , (EC No. 2912033) , S /o Lachaiah , aged about 36, years Ex-Badli Filler, RK- 7 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur Area, Srirampur, Adilabad Distt.

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

AND

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited , Rep . by its General Manager, SrirampurArea, Srirampur, Adilabad Distt .

क्रा. आ. 1031.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच 3052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

2. The Dy. General Manager, RK-7 Incline, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, SrirampurArea, Srirampur , Adilabad Distt.

Respondents

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board .

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of . the preceding 5 years of the dismissal.

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person /represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri P.A.V.V.S. Sarma on a perusal of the case record , after considering and. hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of bothsides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered , provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service.

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed.

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses (a) to ( g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short- fall of attendance during the 3 months period , the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

In agreement of the above , the parties/counsel have affixed their signatures/ thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

SH/-

Sd/-

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents /natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals willbe deemed as attendance during the trial period .

Signature ofApplicant (s) Signature of Respondent (s )

sa/-

Signature ofCounsel for Applicant (s )

Sa/-

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer , hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh .

Signature of Counsel for Respondent ( s )

1. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

3. Sd/-

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

Signature ofPresiding Officer & Members of Bench .

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2 ) ofthe LSAAct , 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT,

HYDERABAD

LCID No. 37/2009

का. आ. 1032.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 35/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Proposals of the management :

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of

[सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी 3053 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26 , 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

appearing in person / represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person / represented by his counsel , Sri P.A.V.V.S. Sarma on a perusal of the case record, after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides, the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

S.O. 1032. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 35/ 2009 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-03-2011.

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 [No. L -22013/ 1 /2011 - IR(C - II ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to ( g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Court atHyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987 )

This LCID is disposed of accordingly.

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

In agreement of the above , the parties/counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

PRESENT:

Sd/-

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

Signature ofApplicant (s) Signature of Respondent ( s ) : Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

Sd/-

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

Signature of Counsel for Applicant(s )

(Constituted U /s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006, dt. 22-08-2006)

Sd/-

In the matter of case No. LCID No. 35/2009

Signature of Counsel for Respondent ( s )

PLAC 5/2011

3. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

1. Sd/-

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad )

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench .

BETWEEN :

Golla Posham, (E. No. 2329280 ), S/o Golla Beemaiah ,

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2 ) of the LSA Act , 1987 .

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer

Petitioner

aged about 41 years , Ex-CoalFiller at SRP- 1 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, SrirampurArea, Srirampur, Adilabad Distt.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

AND

LCID No. 35/2009

Proposals of the management :

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its General Manager , Srirampur Area, Srirampur , Adilabad Distt.

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal, Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

Respondents

2. The Superintendent of Mines , SRP- 1 Incline, Singareni Collieries Company Limited , Srirampur Area , Srirampur, Adilabad Distt .

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence ofthe applicant

1217 GI /11-9 3054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA 26 , 1933

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed .

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents / natural disease , treatment taken at Company'sHospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period .

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer , hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. for appointment afresh .

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987 .

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2011

का. आ. 1033.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संदर्भ संख्या 30/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013 / 1/2011- आई आर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

S.O. 1033. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( LCID No. 30/ 2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure inthe industrial dispute between the employers in relation

[PART II- SEC . 3(ii)| to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-3-2011 .

[No. L- 22013 / 1 /2011 - IR (C- II ) | D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum-Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

PRESENT :

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

: Member 2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

Member 3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy :

(Constituted U/ s 19 of the LSA Act , 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006 , dt . 22-8-2006) In the matter of case LCID No. 30/2009

PLAC 4/2011 (Onthe file of CGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad)

BETWEEN

Dharawath Mohan ,

S/o Dharma,

aged about 36 years , Ex - Coal Filler at

RK-6 Incline,

Singareni Collieries Company Limited,

SrirampurArea, Srirampur,

Petitioner Adilabad Dist . ,

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep. by its General Manager, Sriarmpur Area , Srirampur, Adilabad District

2. The Superintendent ofMines , RK-6, Incline, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur , Adilabad Dist

Respondents Thiscase is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-1-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present inperson/ represented by his counsel , Sri M. V. Hanumantha Rao on a perusal of the case record , after considering and भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act, 1987 The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [Clauses (a) to (g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet(enclosed to the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal . Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

This LCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above , the parties /counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

Sd/- Sd/-

Signature of Respondent (s) Signature of Applicant(s )

Sd/- Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s) Sd/- Signature of Counsel forApplicant(s)

3. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

1. Sd/-

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of the Bench .

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2) of the LSA Act , 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 30/2009

PROPOSALS OF THE MANAGEMENT In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of the preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered , provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date ofdismissal from service.

3055 (d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed .

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short fall of attendance during the 3 months period, the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents/natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period.

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh .

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

का. आ. 1034. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संदर्भ संख्या -130/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/ 1/2011- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

S.O. 1034. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( LCID No. 130/2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Centra ! Government on 18-3-2011 .

[No. L -22013/1 /2011 - IR (C - II )] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer 3056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act , 1987)

Monday, the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and

Eleven

PRESENT :

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

: Member 2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member 3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/ s 19 of the LSAAct , 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/ LSA/ 2006, dt . 22-8-2006 ) In the matter of case LCID No. 130/2006

PLAC21 /2011 (Onthe file ofCGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad)

BETWEEN

Ramilla Saraiah ( EC No. 2640806), S/ o Mallaiah ,

aged about 34 years , Worked as Coal Filler at RK- 1A Incline, SCCL,

Mandamarri ,.

Adilabad Dist .

Petitioner

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep. by its General Manager, Mandamarri Area , Post : Kalyankhani , Adilabad District .

2. The Superintendent of Mines , RK- 1A , Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, MandamariArea ,

Adilabad District

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) | contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by himby signing the proposal' sheet( enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above , the parties/counsel have affixed their signatures/thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

Sd/ -

Sd/- Signature of Applicant (s ) Signature of Respondent (s) Sd/-

Sd/- Signature of Counsel

Signature of Counsel forApplicant( s)

for Respondent ( s ) Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench 1. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

3. Sd/- Note : This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2) of the LSA Act, 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 130/2006

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

Respondents

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-1-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person /represented by his counsel , $ri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri PAVVS Sarma on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent ofboth sides, the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a ) to ( f) ] , the (b) At lease 100 musters in any of the two years of the preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism . dismissal cases will be considered , provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same placewhere the workman was last employed.

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short- fall of attendance during the 3 months period, भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011/चैत्र 26 , 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents /natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period .

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment fresh .

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

Sd/-

Sd/- AGM ( LAW) , Hyderabad नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2011

का. आ. 1035.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 142/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

S.O. 1035. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 142/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 18-3-2011 .

[No. L-22013 /1/2011 - IR (C- II )] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(For settlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Courtat Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act , 1987)

Monday, the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

3057 PRESENT:

Presiding Officer 1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao :

Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

Member 3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy :

(Constituted U / s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006 , dt . 22-8-2006) In the matter of case No. LCID No. 142/2006

PLAC 23/2011 (Onthe file ofCGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad)

BETWEEN

Petitioner Kandhi Tirupathi , (EC No. 2815817) , S/o Mondaiah , aged about 43 years , Worked as Coal Filler at RK- 7 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur Area , Adilabad Dist .

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep . by its General Manager, Srirampur Area , Srirampur, Adilabad District

Respondents 2. The Dy . General Manager, RK- 7 , Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur, Adilabad District

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-1-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person / represented by his counsel . Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person / represented by his counsel , Sri PAVVS Sarma on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent ofboth sides, the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to (g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosedto the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

3058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )| In agreement of the above, the parties/ counsel have affixed their signatures/thumb impressions in the presence of the members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

S/-

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work, days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh.

Sd/-

Signature ofApplicant(s ) Signature of Respondent (s )

Sd/-

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass.consent award under section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

Signature of Counsel forApplicant(s)

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s )

Sd/-

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench

Sd/- AGM ( LAW) , Hyderabad 1. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

3. Sd/-

नई दिल्ली; 18 मार्च , 2011

Note : This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec. 21 (2) of the LSA Act, 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

का. आ. 1036. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल डब्ल्यू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 257/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

LCID No. 142/2006

PROPOSALS OF THE MANAGEMENT

[सं. एल-22012/58/2000- आई आर ( सी -11 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011 In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

S.O. 1036. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 257 / 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 18-3-2011.

[No. L-22012/ 58 /2000- IR( C - II ) | D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer (c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER , CGIT-CUM -LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR (d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed.

Case No. CGIT/NGP/257 / 2000

Date : 9-3-2011

PartyNo. 1 : The General Manager ( W) . NandanWashery ofWCL, Post Office Damua, District Chhindwara (M.Ρ. ) (e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short- fall of attendance during the 3 months period , the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

Versus

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents/ natural disease , treatment taken at Company'sHospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period .

Party No. 2 : The General Secretary, Bhartiya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh , (BMS) , Vishwakarma Bhawan . PostParasia, Distt . Chhindwara .

3059 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

AWARD

(Dated : 9th March , 2011 )

Inexercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers in relation the management of General Manager ( W) , WCL and their workman , Shri Mohd . Shakil Parvej for adjudication, as per letter No. L - 22012/ 58 /2000- IR ( CM - II ) dated 25 /29-8-2000 , with the following Schedule:

"Whether the action of the General Manager ( W) , Nandan Washeri of WCL , Kanhan Area , PO Damua, Distt . Chhindwara (M.P. ) in not regularizing / promoting Shri Mohd . Shakil Parvej S/o . Shri Gulamuddin as Tindal in Category - IV w.e.f. 23-10-1989 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. Being noticed , the workman , Shri Mohd . Shakil Parvej (" the workman " in short ) filed his statement ofclaim through his union and the management of Western Coalfield Limited ( " the Party No. 1 " in short) filed its written statement.

3. The case ofthe workman is that the workman was selected to undergo training as Tyndal Category - II alongwith others for two years in the year 1987 and he completed the training period successfully alongwith other trainees and after completion of the training, all other trainees , except himself and one Shri Ashok , were regularized as Tyndal Category- IV vide Office Order No. NW/6602/2048 , dated 22 /23-10-1989 and Shri Ashok was also designated as Tyndal Category- IV alongwith his other batch mates , with notional seniority and fixation benefits w.e.f. 23-10-1989 , but he was not regularized as Tyndal Category - IV, so the matter was taken up at I.R. Forum at area level discussion under item No. 19 ofrecord note of discussion held on 19-10-1995 and . when all the efforts to get him regularized as Tyndal Category- IV failed, the union raised the industrial dispute in the conciliation machinery, but that too ended in failure resulting the present reference . Prayer has been made by the workman to hold the action of the management in not regularizing/ promoting him as Tyndal category - IV to be unjust and illegal and for a direction for his regularization as Tyndal Category- IV, as per with other trainees .

committee and the workman applied for his selection for the post ofTyndal and he was interviewed by the selection committee and was selected for training of Tyndal Cat . - 11 and one of the conditions for selection was that the employees so selected for training period would be observed during the training period and the training period was for two years , but the performance of the workman was unsatisfactory and he was also not attaining the duties regularly, so management issued several letters to the workman including a letter dated 12/ 19-2-1989 , in order to give him an opportunity to improve his performance but the workman did not improve his performance , so he was not regularized to the post of Tyndal Cat - IV. It is the further caseof Party No. I that the workman did not perform the duties of Tyndal even during the training period and did not show any interest in carrying out the duties of Tyndal , therefore, the management at the instance of the workman and the trade union , allotted the duties of Pumper to the workman , which he is doing even today and the Trade Union namely BKKMS raised the issue of the workman before the management, as a result of which , the workman wasplaced/regularized as Pump Operator Category - III by letter bearingNo. NW/02/97/948 , dated 4-4-1997, with the consent of the workman and the Trade Union and the workman is operating a pump of 125 HP capacity and the dispute regarding the present workman and Ashok, for their regularization was raised by the union in the year 1995, as per demand No. 19 and after a detailed discussion, it was decided between the management and union to depute Shri M. M. Chandok on behalf of the management and Shri Shiv Dayal Bisandre , on behalf ofthe Trade Union to examine the issue and after examining the issue , it was found that there was absolutely no merit in the case of the workman and, therefore , Shri Ashok was regularized in the postofTyndal Category - IV and in the year 1999, the union gave a strike notice dated 12-1-1999 to the management and in the said notice , one of the demands of the Trade Union was for regularization of the workman in the post of Tyndal category - IV and there was a meeting between the representative of the management and the Trade Union and it was brought to the notice of the Trade Union that the workman is working in the post of Pumpe: Category- III and the management would consider his case on the basis of the factual position or otherwise to intimate the Trade Union accordingly and after considering the case oftheworkman, it was communicated to the Trade Union bythe management that the workman cannot be regularized as Pumper Category- IV, as the workman was operating a pump ofthe capacity 125 HP and as such , the claim ofthe union for regularization of the workman as Tyndal Cat . - IV is absolutely baseless and without any merit and the Trade Union as well as the present workman are well aware that the post of Tyndal in Washery has been abolished long back and the workmen working as Tyndals were posted as PlantOperators and as such , the workman is not entitled 4. The party No. 1 in its written statement has pleaded inter alia that the workman was appointed as a daily piece rated worker on 11-11-1983 at Damua colliery and in 1987 , there was shortage of Tyndals , so the management decided to select Tyndals from the workmen already employed by it and accordingly, formed a selection for any relief.

3060

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA 26 , 1933

the condition and as the workman is working as a Pumper and he has been placed as Pumper Cat - III and the workman did notperformthe duty of Tyndal even during his training period and did not show any interest in carrying out the duties of Tyndal and as such , at the instance of the workman and the trade union , he was allotted the duties ofPumper.

5. In support ofhis claim , the workman has examined himself as a witness , besides placing reliance on documentary evidence . One Shri Prabesh Kumar Tripati has been examined as a witness on behalf of the management. The management has also placed reliance on documents . The workman in his evidence , which is on affidavit , has reiterated the stands taken by the union in the statement of claim and in the rejoinder. The witness examined on behalf of the Party No. 1 has also reiterated the stands ofthe Party No. 1 taken in the written statement.

The workman in his cross - examination has admitted that he is working as pump operator since last 5 to 6 years and he has never refused to work as pump operator.

7. So far the contention raised by the union regarding the condition imposed by the Party No. I regarding the training of the workman and others is concerned , the same cannot be taken into consideration , as the workman after accepting the condition imposedby the management joined to undergo the training of Tyndal . Moreover, the union did not raise such a dispute before the conciliation authority and no reference has been made by the Central Government to decide such a question . It is also found from record that the management witness has no where admitted that the work of the workman from 23-6-1987 to 25-3-1988 was satisfactory, on the other hand , it is found that the witness for the management has categorically denied that the work of the workman from the date of his joining till the date on which he sustained injury was satisfactory. It is found from the record and the documents filed by the parties that the workman was selected to undergo training for two years , as Tyndal Cat- II and after the workman joining to undergo training, he did not attend his duty regularly and was in the habit of remaining absent unauthorisedly and as such , management had issued a letter dated 12/ 19-2-1989 to improve his performance or else to revert him back to his original post before the completion of the training period. It is also found from the documents that as the workman did notjoin duty after he was declared free from injury and fitfor joining duty by the doctor on 9-10-1988 , a charge sheet was submitted against him for unauthorized absence for more than 10 days . It is also found from the letter dated 3-9-1989 that the workman was remaining absent from duty. Asthe performance of the workman was not satisfactory during the period training and he was remaining absent without due permission , the management was justified in not regularizing the workman as Tyndal Category - IV. From the evidence on record , it is found that the action of the Party No. 1 in not regularizing/ promoting the workman as Tyndal Cat . - IV is justified . Hence , it is ordered :

ORDER

The action of the General Manager ( W) , Nandan Washery of WCL , Kanhan Area , PO Damua , Distt . Chhindwara ( M.P. ) in not regularizing/promoting Shri Mohd . Shakil Parvej S / o . Gulamuddin as Tyndal in Category- IV w.e.f. 23-10-1989 isjustified. The workman is not entitled for any relief.

Sd/- J. P. CHAND , Presiding Officer.

6. At the time of argument , it was submitted on behalf of the workman that the service conditions of the workman are governed under the provisions of the certified standing order of WCL and the post of Tyndal has been classified in Cat . - IV and according to the classification of the workman, his posting in thejob of Tyndal Cat . - IV from the post of DPR was one of probationer and as per the standing orders , if a permanent workman is employed as probationer in a new higher post , he may be at any time during the probationary period, not exceeding 6 months , be reverted back to his old post , unless the probation period is extended by another 3 months , for reason to be recorded in writing and if no positive order is issued by the management on expiry of the probation period , as the casemay be, the employee will be deemed to have been confirmed and as such , the order of the Party No. 1 that the trainees should be under observation for 2 years is not in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Employment (Standing Orders ) Act and such direction was in breach of the terms of the settlement and as such , not regularizing the workman in Tyndal Category- IV isillegal and the witness for the management has admitted that the work of the workman from 23-6-1987 to 25-3-1988 was satisfactory and on 25-3-1988 , the workman met with an accident while on duty and therefore , the workman is entitled for regularization in Tyndal Cat . - IV, as per his training mate . On the other hand , it was submitted by themanagement that the workman and ten others were selected to undergo training as Tyndal Category - II and in the order itself, it was clearly mentioned that they would be on training for a period of two years , during which period , they would be placed on category - II ofthe NOWA - III pay scale and after satisfactory completion of the prescribed training , their case would be considered for appointment as Tyndal Cat - IV and if their performance would not be satisfactory, they would be reverted back to their original post even before completion of the training period and the workman joined his duty in the new post of Tyndal to undergo training and joining of the workman proves his acceptance of the conditions imposed by the management for the appointment of Tyndals and as such , hel cannot raise a grievance regarding the imposition of भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2011

का. आ. 1037.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी . डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 31/2004, 33/2004 और 1105/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

एल-42012/ 150/2003- आई आर( सी-11 ) , [सं. एल-42012/151/2003- आई आर ( सी- II ) , एल-42012/149/2003- आई आर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

S.O. 1037. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 31/ 2004, 33/2004 and 1105/2005 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. - II , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-3-2011 .

[Nos . L-42012/ 151 /2003 - IR(C- II ), L-42012/ 150/2003 - IR(C - II ), L-42012/ 149 /2003 - IR(C- II ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- IL, CHANDIGARH

PRESENT :

Sri A. K. Rastogi , Presiding Officer

1. Case No. I.D. 31/2004 Registered on 30-11-2004

Sh. Satish Kumar

S/o Sh . Jaipal Singh , Electrician

C/oAll India CPWD ( MRM ) Karamchari Sanghathan , (Regd 4823 ) ,

Balbir Nagar Extension , Gali No. 13, Shahadra, Delhi - 110032

1217 GI/11-10

3061 2. Case No. I.D. 33/2004 Registered on 30-11-2004

Sh. Gurvir Singh

S/ o Sh . Sardar Singh ,

C/oAll India CPWD ( MRM) Karamchari

Sanghathan, (Regd 4823 ), Balbir Nagar Extension, Gali No. 13 ,

Shahadra, Delhi - 110032

3. Case No. I.D. 1105/2005 Registered on 21-9-2005

Sh . Aishvir Singh

S/ o Shri Dhyan Singh ,

C/oAll India CPWD (MRM ) Karamchari Sanghathan , (Regd 4823 ) ,

BalbirNagar Extension , Gali No. 13 ,

.Applicants Shahadra , Delhi- 110032

Versus

1. The Director General of Works , CPWD , Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi - 110011 .

Respondents 2. The Executive Engineer, Central Electrical Division , NH- IV, CPWD , Faridabad

APPEARANCES :

Sh . S. D. Sharma , Advocate For the Workman :

For the Management : Sh . Sanjeev Sharma , Advocate

AWARD Passed on 28th February, 2011

VideOrder No. L-42012 / 151 /2003 - IR(CM- II ) dated 29-7-2004, Order No. L -42012 / 150 /2003 - IR(CM - II) ) dated 9-8-2004 read with Corrigendum dated 14-3-2004 and Order No. L -42012/ 149/2003 - IR ( CM - II ) ) dated 10-3-2004 The following disputes respectively have been referred for adjudication to this Tribunal by the Central Government under Section 10( 1 ) (d) and Sub - section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as Act ) :

1. "Whether the contract between the management of CPWD and the contractor is sham ? If so, the demand of All India CPWD ( MRM ) Karamchari Sangathan for reinstatement/ regularization of Sh . Satish Kumar in the establishment of CPWD is justified and to what relief he is entitled ?" 2. "Whether the action of the management of CPWD , Faridabad in terminating the services of 3062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) | Sh .Gurvir Singh , Pump Operator w.e.f. 6-6-2001 is legalandjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief he is entitled to and from which date ?יי

3. " Whether the action of the CPWD , Faridabad in terminating the services of Sh . Aishvir Singh , Electrician w.e.f. 6-6-2001 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief he is entitled ?"

In all the above references common questions of law and facts are involved , hence they are being adjudicated upon by this common award .

The claims were resisted on the grounds that they are bad for non -joinder of Union of India , barred by limitation and not maintainable , as the mnagement is not an industry and there is no Industrial Dispute . According to the management one R.P.F.C. had given the electric maintenance to CPWD and the latter on behalf of RPFC had given a contract to Virmani Electric Co. , for carrying out the work of electrical maintenance . The claimants/ workmen were engaged by the contractor for maintenance ofthe above installations . There is no employer - employee relationship between the management and claimants/ workmen . The claimants were neither on the roll of the management nor they were engaged by it and since the claimants are not the employees of the management . therefore, the question of seniors or juniors does not arise . The claimants/workmen have however , worked with the contractors for a regular period of more than 240 days in a year but they were not under the direct control of the management . It has been further pleaded that RPFC has withdrawn the work from CPWD since then hence the work is not of perennial nature. According to the management the claims of the workmen have no merits .

Claimants/Workmen filed a rejoinder to the written statement ofthe management and it was pleaded inter - alia that though Vermani Electrical Company had been granted the contract for carrying out the work of electrical maintenancebut for all intents and purposes the claimants/ workmen worked under the direct control and supervision ofthe management .

From the pleadings of the parties following issues arise for consideration :

1. Whether the claim is bad for non -joinder of Union of India ?

2. Whether CPWD is not an industry ? If so , its effect ?

3. Whether the contract between the management and the contractor to hire the servicesofthe claimants/workmen was a sham and the workmen were the employees of the management ?

4. If the workmen were the employees of the management , whether their services were terminated in violation of the provisions of the Act ?

5. To what reliefs are the workmen/ claimants entitled to ?

Although in the reference orders All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan (hereinafter referred to as Union) is not a party yet the claim statement has been filedby the Union in I.D. No. 1105 of 2005 impleading the concerned workman as claimant No. 2 , while in other two references the claim statement has been filed by the concerned workman impleading union also as a claimant . Admittedly all the three workmen were employed in Central Public Works Department ( CPWD) on different dates in the years 1996 and 1997 through a contractor at Faridabad . Workmen Satish Kumar and Aishvir were employed as Electricians and Gurvir Singh as Pump Operator. Their services were terminated on 6-6-2001 . The workmen have stated that the union is a Registered Union of workmen and they are members of this Union . They had raised an Industrial dispute stating that though they were engaged through contractor yet for all intents and purposes they worked under the complete control of the management and they were answerable to the management regarding their duties . Their employment was not concurrent or simultaneous with the award of any particular contract . They continued working under different contractors even though the contract awarded to earlier contractor had lapsed. Their work was of perennial nature . They were engaged by the management through contractor with a designed purpose of depriving them of the benefits and protection under labour laws . The contract was a camouflage andthere was relationship of employer and employee between the management and the concerned workmen. They have completed more than 240 days in a year during their tenure yet their services were terminated in violation ofthe provisions of the Act . While terminating their services , persons junior to them were retained. It has been further agitated that the management has regular employees discharging the same and similar work as was being discharged by the workmen but management never considered workmen's claim for regularization of their services . The Government of India vide notification dated 31-7-2002 has abolished the specific contract system regarding electricians; the post of Pump Operator however, is not included . The workmen have claimed their regularization on the sanctioned vacant posts and pay parity from the regular employees .

Insupport of their cases, the concerned workmen filedtheir affidavits in their respective cases and examined 3063 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

B. S. Pannu, retired Assistant Engineer of the management . Though it is mentioned in the statement of B. S. Pannu thathe is tendering his affidavit which is on record but in fact, he has not filed any affidavit and has only given his statement on oath .

employment through contractor but their case is that the contract was sham and they worked under the complete control of the management and were answerable to the management. They even continued working under different contractors despite the termination of the earlier contract. Their work was of perennial nature and in fact they were the employees of the management.

Onbehalf ofmanagement the affidavit ofAjit Singh was tendered in evidence .

The management on the other hand had denied the relationship of employer and employee with the workmen .

It may be mentioned here that after receiving back the record ofthe case on transfer from C.G.I.T- cum-Labour Court - 1 , Chandigarh, the workmen or his ARs did appear in the case but the management did not bother to appear and submit its arguments in the case despite notices issued to the management on 25-5-2010 and by Registered post on 24-6-2010 . The counsel for workman , however, made his oral submissions and filed written arguments as well . I have perused the record and the evidence produced by the parties and also considered the arguments of the learned counsel for workmen . My findings on various issues are as follows :

Issue No. 1

The management has assailed the claims of the workmen on the ground of non -joinder of Union of India ; regarding which the workmen have pleaded in their rejoinder that the Director General ( Personnel) CPWD , Nirman Bhawan , New Delhi represent the Government of India , therefore the claim cannot be assailed on this ground.

Intheir respective statements , the workmen have admitted that they have not been given any appointment letter. But they were very specific in stating that they worked under the directions of J.E. and got their wages from the J.E. and A.E. and also they were removed from thejob not by the contractor but by the J.E. The statement ofB.S. Pannu , retired Assistant Engineer of CPWD who was examinedby workmen as their witness , however , docs not support the case of the workmen in full . He worked in the management Division as Assistant Engineer from April 1996 to May 2005. He has stated that the CPWD maintains the Central Government buildings at Faridabad and the maintenance work of the Government buildings was of a permanent nature . But indenting department i.e. the department to which the buildings belongs can change the Agency to maintain the same . He admitted that as an Assistant Engineer he used to check and verify the working of the contracting Agencies in the maintenance of buildings and the workmen engaged for maintenance used to report for duty to the concerned J.E. and concerned J.E. used to provide material also to the workmen required for maintaining the building . In his cross -examination he has stated also that during his tenure the contract was allotted to Virmani Electrical Company and it was contractor who had appointed the workmen and contractor used to pay the wages to the workmen.

In this regard it may be mentioned that a claim is not a suit and Section 79 of Code of Civil Procedure is not applicable to the claims under the Act and the management being a modal employer is not expected to raise such technical pleas to defeat the claim of a poor workman . I am therefore , of the view that the claim cannot be assailed on the ground of non -joinder of Union of India. Issue No. 1 is decided against the management.

Issue No. 2

The management witness Ajit Singh has also stated during his cross - examination that the work of maintenance atCentral Government buildings at Faridabad is attended by the CPWD and the work of maintenance is not of a permanent nature . The Department concerned can ask any other agency to do the work . The claimants / workmen had been engaged by the contractor for a limited period and for a specified job .

The worksmen have placed on record the photo copies of certain documents to show that they worked under the supervision of the management .

The objection of the management that it is not an industry is also devoid of any force . In Executive Engineer CPWD Indore Versus Madhukar Purshottam Kolharkar and another 2000 ( II ) LLJ 1410 , ( SC ) by virtue of Banglore Water Supply case the Central Public Works Department wasprecluded from contending that it was not an industry. Hence , issue No. 2 is also decided against the management .

Issue No. 3

From the evidence of the parties it is clear that the workmen had been engaged by the management through contractor for the maintenance of Central Goverment's buildings belonging to other department. The workmen worked under the supervision of the Engineers of the It is not in dispute that the claimants /workmen had been employed through contractor. In their claim statements the workmen have themselves alleged their 3064

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )|

In determining the relationship of an employer and employee , all other relevant facts and circumstances are required to be considered including the terms and conditions ofthe contract . It is necessary to take a multiple pragmatic approach weighing up all the factors for and against an employment instead of going by the sole " Test of Control " . An integrated approach is needed . " Integration" test is one of the relevant tests . It is applied by examining whether the person was fully integrated in the employers' concern or remained apart from and independent of it . The other factors which may be relevant are-who has the powers to select and dismiss , to pay remuneration , deduct Insurance contributions , organize the work , supply tools and materials and what are the "mutual obligations " between them.

management . Materials required for the maintenance of work were also supplied by the management. But there is nothing to show that the workmen/claimants had been employed by the management . Rather the workmen's witness B. S. Pannu has specifically stated that the workmenwere the appointees of the contractor. There is no evidence either to show that the management was the pay master vis -a- vis the workmen . As the learned counsel for the workmen has mentioned in his arguments that the management being the principal employer paid wages to the contractor, who in turn disburse the same to the workmen. The arguments of the learned counsel for the workmen is that by virtue of engagement of contract labour by the contractor in any work or in connection with the work of establishment , the relationship of master and servant is created between the principal employer and the contract labour and this relationship is created irrespective ofthe fact as to who brought about such relationship , so the workmen were the employees of the principal employer and the contract was'merely a formality and was sham . He also argued that building for which the workmen had been engaged are still in existence and the nature ofjob of the workmen is of a permanent nature . The learned counsel for the workman has relied on Steel Authority of India Versus Nation Union Water Front Unit (2001 ) 7 SCC 1 Bharat Heavy Electrical Versus State of U.P. (2003 ) 6 SCC 528 and Ram Singh Versus U.T. Chandigarh (2004) 1 SCC 126.

Applying the above laid down tests , it will appear from the evidence on record that the workman were not integrated in the respondent concern . In this regard it may be mentioned that R.P.F.C. had given its electric maintenance to C.P.W.D. and C.P.W.D. on behalfof R.P.F.C. gavethe contract to Virmani Electrical Company for carrying out the work of electrical maintenance . The claimants/ workmen were engaged by the contractor for the maintenance of above installations . It has also been pleaded that R.P.F.C. has withdrawn the work from C.P.W.D. since then . The claimants have filed rejoinder but they have not specifically denied the above position .

The next question is who has the powers to select and dismiss the claimants/ workmen . WW- 2, B. S. Pannu , a witness of the claimant/workmen themselves has stated that the claimants/ workmen were the appointees of the contractor. There is no evidence to show that the workmen had been appointed by the respondent/ management and their services were terminated by the latter.

In the latter mentioned case of Ram Singh, the two earlier mentioned case laws have been referred . The learned counsel for the claimants has relied on para 16 of Ram Singh's case (supra). The Apex Court has held in that para that "Normally the relationship of employer and employee does not exist between the employer and the contractor and servant of an independent contractor. Where however an employer retains and assumes control over the means and method by which the work of a contractor is to be done , it may be said that the relationship between the employer and employee exist between him and the servant of such a contractor. "

Regarding payment of remuneration it has been mentioned in the arguments of the claimants themselves that the management paid wages to the contractor, who in turn disbursed the same to the workmen . It is not important from where the contractor got the money. The important fact is that it was the contractor who paid the wages to the claimants/workmen .

There is no evidence that any deduction of Insurance contribution was made by the management/ respondent .

The arguments of the learned counsel for the claimants is that from the evidence on record it is established that the workmen worked under the supervision of the Engineers of the management and the materials required for the maintenance of work were also supplied by the management . Therefore , a relationship of employer and employee exists between the respondents and the claimants/ workmen .

I am of the view that the facts that the claimants/ workmen worked under the supervision of the Engineers of the management and the management supplied the materials to them are not sufficient to establish a relationship of employer and employee between the respondent/management and the workmen/ claimants .

But in this regard earlier para i.e. para no . 15 of the aforesaid case cannot be lost sight of. In this para the Apex Court has held that in determining the relationship ofan employer and employee , no doubt , " Control " is one ofthe important test, but is not to be taken as the sole test. * 3065 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

employees of the respondent/management . The management was not under any obligation to comply and provisions of the Act governing the termination of the services of an employee . Issue No. 4 is decided against theworkmen.

Issue No. 5

It has been held above that the contract between the management of CPWD and the contractor is not sham andthe claimants /workmen were not the employees of the management ofCPWD .

The learned counsel for the claimants / workmen has argued that the record required to be maintained under the "General Conditions of Contract for Central Public Works Department works and the Contractor's Labour Regulations " has not been produced by the respondent management , which shows the connivance of the management/ respondent with the contractor. It is important to note that the records required to be maintained mentioned in the arguments are not to be maintainedby the principal employer but by the contractor . Therefore , the said records cannot be said to be in the possession of respondent/management . Respondent /management was not under any obligation to produce the said records . The contractor whose existence is admitted in the case has not been made a party in the claims or in the reference. Ifthe records were relevant for the purposeose of claimants/ workmen, then it was for them to summon the records from the contractor and if the contractor has not maintained the records then he and not the management is liable for that . No adverse inference can be drawn against the management for not placing the said record before the court. It is more so when it is an admitted position that the workmen were engaged through the contractor.

The learned counsel for the workmen has relied on Rajinder Lal versus Union of India 2000( 4) SCT 819 which is a case concerning the contract workers of CPWD . In this case Hon'ble Delhi High Court has issued certain directions . But the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in direction No. 3 has very categorically stated that these directions shall not apply in those cases where the particular contract of maintenance etc. given by other establishment to the CPWD earlier has ceased to operate with the result that CPWD is not having the work/ contract any longer. In those cases it would be open to the CPWD to disengage such workers as not required any longer in the absence ofwork/ job/particular activity with the CPWD.

The Government of India notification dated 31-7- 2002 regarding " Abolition of the contract system " came into existence after about a year of the termination of the services of the workmen on 6-6-2001 . Till the date of notification the Contract system was prevalent in CPWD. No benefit ofthat notification is available to the claimants/ workmen.

From the evidence on record it is also clear that the work for which the claimants /workmen had been engaged was not of perennial nature and it is no more available. The claimants/workmen had been engaged in connection with electrical maintenance of R.P.F.C. who had assigned the said work to CPWD and has withdrawn the said work from CPWD since then .

1, therefore , hold that in I.D. No. 31 of 2004 the demand of All India C.P.W.D. ( MRM ) , Karamchari Sanghthan for reinstatement/ regularization of Shri Satish Kumar in the establishment of CPWD is not justified and in I.D. No. 33 of2004 and I.D. No. 1105 of2005 it is held thatthe services of Shri Gurvir Singh , Pump Operator and Aishvir Singh , Electrician were not terminated by the CPWD. The claimants/ workmen are , therefore , not entitled to any relief. The references in all the above three cases are answered against the workmen . A copy of the award beplaced in the file of I.D. No. 31/2004, 1105/2005 and 33/ 2004 each. Let two copies of award be sent to the Central Government for further necessary action.

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

From the above going discussions, it is clear that there is nothing to consider the contract between the management and the contractor to hire the services of the claimants/workmen a sham or subterfuge and the claimants / workmen were not the employees of the management . Issue No. 3 is according decided against the claimants/workmen .

IssueNo. 4

का. आ. 1038,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल शीप एण्ड वूलन रिसर्च इन्स्टीट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 03/2001 , 163/2002 , 167/2002 , 159/2002, 161/2002, 165/2002 , 155/2002 , 157/2002 , 147/2002 ) को It has been held above that the workmen were not the employees of the management . Their services were not terminated by the management . Hence compliance of Section 25F of the Act was not to be made by the management . They cannot claim seniority with the other 3066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

(5) ID No. 161/2002 Sh . Devinder Singh प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-3-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

(6) ID No. 165/2002 Sh. Chet Ram

(7) ID No. 155/2002 Sh . Fagnu Ram

एल-42012/ 157/2001- आई आर ( सी- II ) ,

(8) ID No. 157/2002 Sh . Dine Ram

एल-42012/ 178/2001- आई आर ( सी- II ) ,

(9) ID No. 147/2002 Sh . Puran Chand

Applicants

Versus

[सं. एल-42012/100/2001- आई आर ( सी- II ) , एल-42012/161 /2001- आई आर ( सी- II ) , एल-42012/176/2001- आई आर ( सी-11 ) , एल-42012/ 159/2001-आई आर ( सी- II ) , एल-42012/ 155/2001- आई आर ( सी- II ) , एल-42012/ 153/2001-आई आर ( सी- II ) , एल-42012/ 180/2001- आई आर ( सी- II ) ]

डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

Director, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute Avika Nagar, Tehsil Malpura , Distt . Tonk (Rajasthan)

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

Senior Administrative Officer , North Temperate . Regional Station Garsa , Distt . Kullu (HP)

Respondents

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Workmen : Shri Kailash Sharma

For the Management : Shri R. K. Sharma and Amit Sharma S.O. 1038. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. Nos . 03 / 2004,163/2002, 167/2002, 159/2002, 161/2002 , 165/2002, 155/ 2002, 157/2002 , 147/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. - I , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 18-3-2011 .

AWARD

Passed on 8th March , 2011

[Nos . L-42012/ 100/2001 - IR(C-II),

L-42012/ 161 /2001 - IR(C- II) ,

L-42012/ 157/2001 - IR( C-II),

L-42012/ 178 /2001 - IR(C-II),

L-42012/ 176/2001 - IR(C -II),

L-42012/ 159/2001 - IR(C- II),

L-42012/ 155 /2001 - IR(C-II),

L-42012/ 153/2001 - IR(C- II ),

L-42012/ 180/2001 - IR(C- II) ]

D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1,

CHANDIGARH

(1) ID No. 03/2004 Sh . Uttam Ram

(2) ID No. 163/2002 Smt . Bhungeri Devi

(3) ID No. 167/2002 Sh . Sangat Ràm

(4) ID No. 159/2002 Sh. Gurdhyan Singh

All the industrial disputes and reference namely ID No. 3 of2004 Sh . Uttam Ram vs. North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avika Nagar , The Malpura Distt . Tonk, Rajasthan , ID No. 167/2002 Sh . Sangat Ram vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Kullu , ID No. 163/2002 Sh . Bhungeri Devi vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Kullu , ID No. 165/2002 Sh . Chet Ram vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Kullu , ID No. 161/2002 Sh . Devinder Singh vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Kullu , ID No. 159/2002 Sh . Gurdhyan Singh Vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Kullu , ID No. 157/ 2002 Sh . Dina Ram vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Kullu , ID No. 155/2002 Sh . Fagnu Ram vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Kullu , ID No. 147/ 2002 Sh . Puran Chand vs. Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Kullu are directly related to each other. Common questions of law and facts are involved in all these references , hence , for ends ofjustice , all these references and industrial disputes are hereby adjudicated by this Award. It is hereby made clear that all these references have been consolidated by the order of this Tribunal and Industrial Dispute No. 3 of2004 Sh . Uttam Ram was made the leading file . All the workmen were working as भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

agricultural labourers in the department and their services were terminated . The common issue involved is the legality of termination order. The references referred in all the industrial disputes are as follows :

ID No. 3/2004

No. L- 42012/100/2001 [ IR (СМ- П ) ] dated 5-1-2004 "Whether the action of the mariagement of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Garsa Distt . Kullu in terminating the service of Sh . Uttam Ram S/ o Sh . Ravti Ram w.e.f. 30-6-1998 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

ID No. 163/2002

No. L- 42012/ 161 /2001 [ IR(CM - II )] dated 6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Garsa Distt. Kullu , represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan in terminating the services of Smt. Bhungeri Devi W/o Sh. Mangu Ram w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? If not , te what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

ID No. 167/2002

No. L- 42012/ 157/2001 [ IR ( CM - II ) ] dated6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Garsa Distt . Kullu , represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar , Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk , Rajasthan in terminating the services of Sh . Sangat Ram S/o Sh . Malsedi w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date ?" ID No. 159/2002

No. L-42012/178 /2001 [ IR( CM - II )| dated 6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Garsa , Distt . Kullu , represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director, Central Sheep and

3067 Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar , Tehsil Malpura , District Tonk, Rajasthan in terminating the services of Sh . Gurdhyan Singh S/o Sh . Dile Ram w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

ID No. 161/2002

No. L-42012/ 176/2001 [ IR ( CM - II) ] dated 6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Garsa Distt . Kullu, represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar , Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan in terminating the services of Sh . Devinder Singh S/o Sh. Chape Ram w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

ID No. 165/2002

No. L- 42012/ 159 /2001 [ IR (CM - II ) ] dated 6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Garsa Distt . Kullu , represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar, Tehsil Malpura , District Tonk , Rajasthan in terminating the services of Sh . Chet Ram S/o Sh . Thaulu Ram w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date ?" ID No. 155/2002

No. L- 42012/155/2001 [ IR( CM - II ) ] dated 6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Garsa, Distt. Kullu, represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director , Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar , Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk , Rajasthan in terminating the services of Sh . Fagnu Ram S/o Sh Luhar Ram w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? " ID No. 157/2002

No. L- 42012/153/2001 [ IR(CM - II )| dated6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of North Temperate Regional Station , Central Sheep and Wool 3068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 / CHAITRA 26, 1933

Research Institute , Garsa Distt . Kullu , represented through the Head North Temperate , Regional Station, Garsa and the Director, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute , Avikanagar , Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan in terminating the services of Sh . Dine Ram S/o Sh Hari Ram w.e.f. 1-7-98 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? " ID No. 147/2002

No. L- 42012/180/2001 [ IR (CM - II) ] dated 6-8-2002 "Whether the action of the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology, Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh . Puran Chand S/ o Sh . Narayan Dasw.e.f. 18-5-1999 is legal andjustified ? If not , to whatrelief he is entitled to ? "

In leading case the evidence was adduced and recorded . The only difference in pleading is the different date of engagement. It is the common contention of each workmen that they were disengaged on 1-7-1998 . The case in nutshell of all the workmen is that they were lawfully engaged as agricultural labour by the management of respondent . They served the department for a long time . Theyhad completed 240 days of work in every calendar year they served the department including the year preceding to the date of termination . No notice or one month wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation was paid to them prior to the termination of their services. This way, as per the contention of each workman, the termination of each workman illegal and void ab initio being against the provisions of the Act .

It isalso contended by each workman that junior to them were retained in service and their services regularized without affording them the opportunity to work .

On the basis of above contentions , each workman have prayed for setting aside the termination order and for consequential order reinstating their services with all other benefits .

The management appeared and opposed the claim ofworkmenby filing written statement . As per preliminary objection, the industrial nature of management was disputed by stating that the management is a Research Institute and is not an industry as per the definition of term " Industry" given in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 . Accordingly, the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to adjudicate these references has been challenged.

Onmerits it is contended by the management that none of the workman has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of termination . The

ирира

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) | management has given a statement of working days relating to each workman . That statement has not been admitted by the workman . On retaining the services of juniors , the management has contended that the services ofpersons for the same work were taken on contract basis on outsourcing after terminating the services of the workman.

Bothof the parties were afforded the opportunity of being heard . Oral evidence was recorded . Documentary evidencewas also filed . The management has filed as more as three Awards passed by the Tribunal of concurrent jurisdiction . The one Award was passed by the Presiding Officer of thisTribunal holding that respondent is not an industry. It has been contended by learned counsel for the workman that this award has been set aside by the Hon'ble High Court holding that the management is an industry. No doubt the workman failed to file the copy of judgment of the Hon'ble High Court setting aside the award passed by this Tribunal on the industrial nature of respondent . But in similar case , this Tribunal has held the respondent to be an industry and accordingly this issue is open once again before this Tribunal whether the respondent is an industry. Moreover , judicial conscious ofthis Tribunal- cum- Labour Court should not be statistic and mustbe flexible and receptive for justice . If a contrary view is taken by this Tribunal previously it should not bind thisTribunal for justice delivery at all . Moreover, the management has also filed a copy of awards passed by the Tribunals of concurrent jurisdiction established under theIndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 at Chandigarh and Jaipur. In these Awards the management has been held to be an industry.

First of all , I am discussing whether the Central Research Institute , the respondent , comes within the definition of industry. The term " industry" has been defined in Section 2(j ) , of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 to mean any business , trade , undertaking , manufacture or calling or employers and includes any calling, services . employment , handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen .

In a landmark judgment Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Rajappa and Others published in (1978 ) , 2 Supreme Court cases 313 , 7 Judges Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court has defined the word " industry " . As per the above mentioned verdict of the Apex Court industry as defined in Sub- section (j ) of Section 2, has a vide import:

(a) Where there is ( i) systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by cooperation between employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chemerical ) , and ( iii ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and 3069 [ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26 , 1933

services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes ( not spiritual or religious but inclusive of materials , things or services geared to celestial bliss) , prima facie , there is anindustry in the enterprise .

(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective isirrelevant, be the venture in the public, joint, private or other sector .

by them. It is admitted in the evidence of the management that workmen were engaged in the work of agriculture . They were paid daily wages . I am unable to understand how the agriculture work like digging , sowing, harvesting . maintaining sheeps, cleaning the places is the work of research nature . The research work of the respondent has no concern with the work entrusted to and discharged by each workman . Accordingly, as per the Bangalore Water Supply case ( supra) I am of the view that management of respondent is an industry.

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer - employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking .

Another issue for adjudication of this Tribunal is whether the management has violated any right of the workman accruing under the Industrial Disputes Act . Each workman has contended that they have worked for substantial period more than 10 years and one fine morning their services were terminated without any notice or one month wages in lieu of notice and without lawful terminal dues. It is also the case of each workman that they have completed 240 days of work in every calendar year from the date of their termination . It is also contended by the each workman that juniors to them were retained in service.

Itisalso the contention of the management that the work which was entrusted to and discharged by each workman was discharged by the contract labour after termination of their services . Now the question arises whether the work was of perennial nature and was continuously available and whether the service conditions ofthe workman can be changed whereas they have served the department for a period of a long time more than 10 years against the provisions of the Act .

Thus, the test mentioned in para no . 140 of the said judgment is necessary to qualify' and institution to be an industry. Regarding the research institutions Hon'ble Apex Court in the very judgment has held that the professions , clubs , educational institutions , cooperatives , research institutions , charitable project and other kindered adventures , if they fulfil the triple tests , cannot be exempted from the scope of Section 2(j ) . The representation category of professions , clubs , cooperatives , and even gurukulas and little research laboratories may qualify for exemption , if, insimple ventures , substantially and going by dominant nature criteria substantially, no employees are entertained , but inminimal matter, marginal employees are hired without destroying the non-employee character of the unit. It has also held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the said judgment that sovereign functions strictly understood alone qualified exemption , not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or statutory bodies . Even in departments discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries and they are substantially several then they can be considered to come within Section 2 (j ) .

The management has filed and relied upon an Award passed by Tribunal of concurrent jurisdiction holding that an employee in similar case was not held entitled for the protection of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act because he failed to prove that he had completed 240 days ofwork in the preceding year from the date of termination . It is the settled law of service jurisprudence that a judgement of Tribunal of concurrent jurisdiction shall not operate as precedent and this Tribunal is empowered to express its view on free judicial conscience on the basis of the evidence and facts and circumstances of each case . Accordingly, I am not guiding myjudicial conscience by the Award relied upon by the management passed by a Tribunal of concurrent jurisdiction .

Everyworkman has challenged their termination on two grounds:

In the last of the judgment the Hon'ble Apex Court held in view of the difficulty experienced by all of us in defining the true denotation of the term industry and divergence of opinion in regard thereto as has been the casewith this Bench also we think, it is high time that the Legislature steps in with a comprehensive bill to clear up the fog and remove the doubts and set at rest once for all the controversy which crops up from time to time in relation to the meaning of the aforesaid term rendering its necessary for larger Benches of this Court to be constituted which are driven to the necessity of evolving aworking formula to cover particular cases .

It means the industrial nature of any enterprise will depend on the work entrusted to workmen and discharged

(1 ) That in spite of completing 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of their termination , their services were terminated without a month notice or without payment of onemonthwages in lieu of notice and without payment of lawful terminal dues .

1217 GI/11-11 3070

THEGAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) | (2) In spite ofcontinuous availability of work their services were terminated and work was taken on outsourcing through some other workers .

I am taking both of the prepositions one by one . Before giving my view on both of the prepositions , it is important to mention that Industrial Disputes Act does not bar the termination of services of casual workers but it regulates the termination . The termination of services of the casual workers is regulated in the sense that if the services of workmen are no more required and they have completed 240 days ofwork in the preceding year from the date of termination , their services have to be terminated as per the procedure laid down in the Act . Meaning thereby, one month notice or payment of one month wages in lieu of notice and payment of lawful retrenchment compensation is condition precedent of termination . If this condition precedent has not been complied with, the termination will be illegal and viod ab initio.

It isalso important to mention that protection given by the Industrial Disputes Act is relating to protection of right to work which has no right to post . The right to work of any workman can even be recognized without any post.Meaning thereby, the casual nature of work can be taken even without any post and if the work is of continuous nature the services of the workman cannot be terminated without complying with the provisions of the Act.

Another issue for adjudication is whether the management is empowered to introduce new system discharging the work entrusted to and discharged by each workman , in case work is of the perennial nature and there had been no complaint against the work and conduct of any workman . The Industrial Disputes Act also recognize and protect the right to work. This right to work onpriority is protected even to retrenchee . It is admitted by the management that work was of continuous nature and the work which the workmen were doing prior to their termination was taken by other persons on outsourcing. Meaning thereby, the work was available but these workmen were denied the work and the same was discharged by another persons through outsourcing . Getting the work through outsourcing also violate the right of each workman for the priority to work under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act . Meaning thereby, on the continuous nature of work the priority should have been given to the workmen and this work should have been given to any workman either directly or through outsourcing. At the cost of repetition the workmen have not come for regularization of their services . They have just approached this Tribunal for the protection of right. towork which is protected by the Industrial Disputes Act . Thus even if the contention of management is believed that none of the workman has completed 240 days of work, their right which was protected under Section 2511 of the Industrial Disputes Act was violated by the management by providing the work which they were doing to another persons on outsourcing . When any right under Section 25H is violated, it is no more required to the workman to prove that they have worked 240 days in the preceding year from the date of their termination. Accordingly, all these industrial disputes are answered as follows:

( 1 ) For the reasons mentioned in the body of this Award the management is an industry.

(2) For the reasons mentioned in the body of the Award the termination of each workman is against the provisions of Section 25H and G ofthe Industrial Disputes Act .

Where the question before the Tribunal is the violation of right of workmen under Section 25H of the Act, the only remedy available to the workmen is their reinstatement in the same position they were working prior to their termination . Thus , the management is directed to reinstate the services of the each workman on the same position they were working prior to their termination within one month from the date of publication of Award . L.ct Central Government be approached for publication of Award and thereafter, files be consigned.

Nodoubt it is the duty of every workman to establish that he completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of termination . The preliminary burden is on the workman that he has worked with the management andhas completed 240 days of work . In all these industrial disputes, it is admitted by the management that every and each workman had worked with the management and it is nowhere challenged that their initial appointment was bad in law. Rather it is contended by the management that Initially their services were taken without the intervention of employment office but during the years 1986 to 1988 their services were taken lawfully through employment office. Meaning thereby, initial engagement of each workan was lawful . In case the management has admitted that workmen had worked for a substantial period and they have requested for summoning the documents , it is on the management to file each and every document relating to the services of the workman . The managerner.t has given a statement along with affidavit without supporting document from where this statement has been made out . None of the workman has admitted the statement . Accordingly, adverse influence shall be taken and it shall be considered that every workman has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of termination . It is admitted that their termination from the service was without notice and without payment of lawful terminal dues . Accordingly, termination was bad in law.

Chandigarh.

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 3071 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

1. The Singareni Collieries Ltd. , Rep. by its General Manager , Bellampalli Area, Bellampalli , Adilabad District .

2. The Superintendent of Mines , Goleti - 1 Incline, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Bellampally, Adilabad Dist. Respondents का. आ. 1039.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संदर्भ संख्या 44/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 18th March, 2011

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person /represented by his counsel, Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present inperson/ represented by his counsel , Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 S.O. 1039.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 44/ 2009 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceived by the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L- 22013/ 1 /2011 - IR(C- II ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE IN THE LOK ADALAT

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses (a) to (g ) ], the contents of which are read over and explained to him in this language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filing is available.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

(For settlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987 )

Monday, the Tenth day of January , Two Thousand and Eleven

In agreement of the above , the parties /counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

PRESENT :

Sd/- Sd/- : Presiding Officer

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

Signature ofApplicant ( s ) Signature of Respondent ( s ) Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Applicant ( s )

(Constituted U /s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186 /LSA/2006 ,dt . 22-08-2006 )

Sd/-

Inthe matter of case LCID No. 44/2009 PLAC 10/2011

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s )

(Onthe file ofCGIT-cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad)

3. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

1. Sd/-

BETWEEN

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench .

Note : This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2 ) of the LSA Act , 1987 .

Petitioner

Nagam Buchapathi , (EC NO . 2307628 ) , S /o Chandraiah, aged about 46, years Ex-CoalFillerat Goleti - 1 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Bellampally, Adilabad Dist.

AND

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer 3072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )| BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

LCID No. 44/2009

[सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर( सी- II ) | डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी Proposals ofthe management :

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011 .

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

S.O. 1040. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( LCID No. 49/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceived by the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

[No. L-22013/1 /2011 - IR(C- II ) | D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service.

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987) (d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal fillingwhere coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed.

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

PRESENT:

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/ s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186 /LSA/2006 ,dt . 22-08-2006 )

Inthe matter of case LCID No. 49/2009 PLAC 11/2011

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents /natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period.

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad )

BETWEEN

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment fresh .

Adapa Raju , ( EC No. 2909543 ), S/ o Ramulu , Aged about 31 years , worked as Badli Filler atRK NT Incline ,

Singareni Collieries Company Limited ,

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

Srirampur Area , Srirampur, Adilabad Dist. , Petitioner

AND

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च, 2011

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep . by its Chief General Manager, SrirampurArea , Srirampur, Adilabad District .

का. आ. 1040.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संदर्भ संख्या 49/2007 )

2. The Superintendent of Mines , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, 3073

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

Respondents RK-NT Incline , Srirampur Area , Srirampur, Adilabad Dist .

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person/represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too, being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao on a perusal ofthe case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to ( g) ] , the contents ofwhich are.read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet(enclosed to the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

This LCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement ofthe above, the parties/counsel have affixed their signatures/ thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

Sd/-

Signature of Respondent (s) Signature of Applicant (s )

Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Applicant(s)

Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Respondent(s)

3. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

1. Sd/-

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench .

Note: ThisAward is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec. 21 (2 ) of the LSA Act , 1987 .

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 49/2007

Proposals of the management :

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals:

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of the preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service.

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment as Badli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed.

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short fall of attendance during the 3 months period . theserviceswill be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents / natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as 'attendance during the trial period .

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh.

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2011

का. आ. 1041.-औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संदर्भ संख्या 125/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

S.O. 1041.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 125/ 2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- 3074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) |

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L- 22013 / 1 /2011 - IR(C- II ) ]

D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to ( g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award), the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and

Eleven

In agreement of the above , the parties/ counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

Sd/-

PRESENT :

Sd/- 1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

Signature of Applicant (s ) Signature of Respondent (s ) Sd/-

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

Signature of Counsel for Applicant (s )

Sd/-

(Constituted U /s 19 of the LSA Act , 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006 ,dt . 22-08-2006)

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s)

Inthe matter of case LCID No. 125/2007

1. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

3. Sd/- PLAC 20/2011

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of the Bench .

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad) .

BETWEEN

Note : This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2 ) ofthe LSA Act , 1987 .

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer Durgam Laxmaiah , (EC No. 1172850), S/ d Posham , aged about 42 years , Ex, CoalFiller at SRP- 1 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampura, Adilabad Dist .

. Petitioner

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

AND

LCID No. 125/2007

Proposals of the management :

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep . by ChiefGeneral Manager, $rirampur, Adilabad District .

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

2. The Superintendent ofMines, $ ingareni Collieries Company Limited, SRP- I, Incline, Srirampur, Adilabad Dist .

Respondents

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least the 100 musters in any of the two years ofthe preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person/represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too, being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri PAVVS Sarma on a perusal of the case record, after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides, the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following :

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered , provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

3075 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same placewhere the workman was last employed.

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

PRESENT:

: Presiding Officer

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006 , dt . 22-08-2006) (f). Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents / natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period.

In the matter ofcase LCID No. 30/2007

PLAC 3/2011

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad ) (g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer , hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh.

BETWEEN

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note ofthe above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

Petitioner

Kalvala Srinivas (EC No. 0882907 ) , S/o Yellaiah , aged about 34 years , Ex. Coal Filler, GDK 6B Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar Dist.

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep . by its Chief General Manager, RG - I Area, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District

का. आ. 1042.-औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 30/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Respondents

2. The Superintendent of Mines , Singareni Collieries Company Limted, GDK 6 B , Incline Godavarikhani , KarimnagarDist .

[सं. एल-22013 /1/2011-आई आर( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 18th March, 2011

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence ofthe applicant appearing in person/represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri S.M. Subhani on a perusal ofthe case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent ofboth sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 S.O. 1042.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 30/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad, as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-03-2011.

[No. L- 22013/1 /2011 - IR(C- II)] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16, 2011/CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] sheet (enclosed to the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

fall of attendance during the 3 months period, the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above , the parties/ counsel have affixed their signatures/thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents /natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period .

$d/-

Sd/-

$ignature of Applicant(s) Signature of Respondent ( s )

$d/-

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointmentwillbe applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work, days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh .

Signature of Counsel Applicant ( s )

Sd/-

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

Signature of Counsel for Respondent(s)

1. Sd/-

2.Sd/-

3. Sd/-

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2011

Signature ofPresiding Officer & Members of the Bench

Note :This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2) ofthe LSA Act, 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO, Presiding Officer

का. आ. 1043.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 116/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 30/2007

[सं. एल-22013/1 /2011- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी Proposals of theManagement :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

S.O. 1043.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( LCID No. 116/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

[No. L-22013/1 /2011 - IR(C- II ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer (c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered , provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment as Badli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same placewhere the workman was last employed.

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act, 1987 )

Monday the Tenth day of January , Two Thousand and Eleven

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26 , 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

PRESENT :

Presiding Officer 1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/s 19 of the LSA Act , 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186 /LSA/2006, dt . 22-08-2006) Inthe matter of case LCID No. 116/2007

PLAC 19/2011

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad ) BETWEEN

Palakurthy Ashanna , ( EC No. 2906503 ) ,

Petitioner S/o P. Balaiah , aged about 30 years , worked as Badli Filler , SRP - I Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur, Adilabad Dist .

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep . by its General Manager, Srirampur , Adilabad District.

Respondents 2. The Superintendent of Mines , Singareni Collieries Company Limted, SRP- I Incline , Srirampur , Adilabad Dist .

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence ofthe applicant appearing in person / represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/represented by his counsel Sri PAVVS Sarma on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent ofboth sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following :

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [Clauses ( a) to (g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet(enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above , the parties /counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

1217 GI/11-12

3077

Sd/- Sd/-

Signature of Respondent ( s ) Signature ofApplicant (s)

Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Applicant (s )

Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s)

3. Sd/-

2.Sd/-

1. Sd/-

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench.

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2) of the LSAAct , 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO, Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOOUR COURT , HYDERABAD

LCID No. 116/2007

Proposals of the management :

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board .

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same placewhere the workman was last employed.

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential in the event of any shortfall of attendance during the 3 months period, the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents /natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period .

3078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

(Onthe file ofCGIT -cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad )

BETWEEN :

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh.

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under section 21 of LSA Act, 1987 .

Petitioner

Manchikatla Prasad , (EC No. 2914467) , S/ o . Pentaiah , aged about 33 years , Ex- Badli Filler , IKIA Incline, Singareni Colljeries Company Limited, Srirampur, Adilabad Dist .

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep. by its General Manager, SrirampurArea, Srirampur , Adilabad District.

2. The Colliery Manager,

का. आ. 1044. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 138/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

IK- 1A Incline, Singareni Collieries Company Limted, Srirampur, AdilabadDist .

Respondents [सं. एल-22013 /1 / 2011- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

Thiscase is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person /represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

AWARD

Under Section 21 ofthe L.S.A. Act , 1987 S.O. 1044. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 138/ 2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L- 22013 / 1 /2011 - IR (C- II )] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE IN THE LOK ADALAT

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to (g ) ] , the contents of which are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by himby signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

(For settlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum-Labour Court atHyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987 )

Monday the Tenth day of January , Two Thousand and Eleven

In agreement of the above , the parties/ counsel have affixed their signatures/thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench ,

PRESENT:

Sd/- Sd/- 1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

Signature of Applicant (s) Signature of Respondent ( s) Sd/-

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

Signature of Counsel for Applicant (s ) Sd/-

(Constituted U/ s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/ LSA/2006 ,dt . 22-08-2006)

In the matter of case LCID No. 138/2007

1. Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Respondent( s ) 2. Sd/- 3. Sd/- PLAC 22/2011

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members of Bench .

3079

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011/चैत्र 26, 1933

[ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec. 21 (2 ) of the LSAAct, 1987 .

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO, Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 138/2007

Proposals of the management :

Inorder to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of the preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment as Badli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed .

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . in the event of any short fall ofattendance during the 3 months period, the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents /natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will. be deemed as attendance during the trial period.

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointmentwill be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment of afresh .

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

का. आ. 1045. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक

अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 68/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/ 1 /2011- आई आर ( सी -11 ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 18th March, 2011

S.O. 1045. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 68/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceived by the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L-22013/1/2011 - IR (C- 11 )] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

PRESENT :

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006 ,dt . 22-08-2006) Inthe matter of case LCID No. 68/2007

PLAC 12/2011

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad) BETWEEN

Addicherla Mallesh (EC No. 1001384),

S/ o Rajamallu , aged about 34 years , worked as Badli Coal Filler atGDK - 7A (LE) Project, RG- I Area,

Petitioner Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar Dist .

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep. by its General Manager, RG - I Area, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar District 3080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals:

2. The Superintendent of Mines , GDK-7 (LE) Project, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar Dist .

Respondents

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3 years from the date of dismissal from service .

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person/ represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person/represented by his counsel , Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following :

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act, 1987

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same placewhere the workman was last employed.

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to (g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by himby signing the proposal sheet (enclosedto the Award) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

(e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential. in the event of any short fall of attendance during the 3 months period , the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above , the parties/ counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence of the members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

(f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents/ natural disease , treatment taken at Company's Hospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period.

Sd/-

Signature ofApplicant ( s) Signature of Respondent (s)

Sd/-

(g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work, days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh.

Signature of Counsel forApplicant ( s)

sa/-

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under Section 21 of LSA Act, 1987 .

Signature of Counsel for Respondent(s)

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2011

1.Sd/-

2. Sd/-

3. Sd/-

Signature ofPresiding Officer & Members of the Bench .

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2) of the LSAAct, 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer

का. आ. 1046.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 05/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

[सं. एल-22013 / 1/ 2011- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी LCID No. 68/2007

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011 Proposals of the management :

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of

S.O. 1046. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No.

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16 , 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

05/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman, which wasreceived by the Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

[No. L- 22013 /1 /2011 - IR(C- II ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum-Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987 )

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and

Eleven

PRESENT :

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U /s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186/LSA/2006 , dt . 22-08-2006) In the matter of case No. LCID No. 5/2008

PLAC 1/2011

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum- Labour Court at Hyderabad) BETWEEN:

Ramatenki Sathaiah, (EC No. 2892584 ),

. Petitioner S/o Ramaiah , aged about 36 years , Ex-Badli Filler, RKNT Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited , Srirampur Area, Adilabad Dist .

AND

1. The General Manager,

Singareni Collieries Company Limited , SrirampurArea, Srirampur, Adilabad District .

2. The Superintendent of Mines , Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , RKNT Incline , Srirampur, Adilabad Dist .

Respondents This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence ofthe applicant appearing in person / represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person / represented by his counsel , Sri S.M. Subhani on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following:

3081

AWARD

Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [Clauses ( a ) to (g) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet (enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available.

ThisLCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above , the parties /counsel have affixed their signatures /thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

Sd/- Sd/-

Signature of Applicant( s ) Signature of Respondent ( s ) Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Applicant (s )

Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s )

Signature of Presiding Officer & Members ofBench

3. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

1. Sd/-

Note : This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec. 21 (2 ) of the LSA Act , 1987 .

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 5/2008

Proposals of the Management :

In order to have speedy and effective settlement of the cases before the Hon'ble Tribunal , Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. agrees to put forth the following proposals :

(a) Absenteeism cases pending before Tribunal as fresh appointment as Badli Coal Filler without back wages and continuity of service subject to medical fitness by Company Medical Board.

(b) At least 100 musters in any of the two years of preceding 5 years of the dismissal .

(c) Only Absenteeism dismissal cases will be considered, provided the dispute is raised within 3years from the date of dismissal from service .

3082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 16, 2011 /CHAITRA 26 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

ANNEXURE

IN THE LOK ADALAT

(d) Irrespective of past designations appointment asBadli Coal Filler afresh on Coal filling where coal filling is available and need not be the same place where the workman was last employed.

(Forsettlement of cases relating to CGIT- cum - Labour Court at Hyderabad under Section 20 of the Legal ServicesAuthorities Act , 1987)

Monday the Tenth day of January, Two Thousand and Eleven

PRESENT :

1. Sri T. Pattabhi Rama Rao : Presiding Officer (e) The observation of one year with minimum mandatory 20 musters every month and review every three months on coal filling only is absolutely essential . In the event of any short fall of attendance during the 3 months period , the services will be terminated without any further notice and enquiry.

: Member

2. Sri C. Niranjan Rao

: Member

3. Sri M. Madhava Reddy

(Constituted U/s 19 of the LSA Act, 1987 by the APSLSA Order ROC No. 186 /LSA/2006,dt . 22-08-2006) (f) Any forced absenteeism on account of mine accidents / natural disease , treatment taken at Company'sHospitals will be deemed as attendance during the trial period.

In the matter of case No. LCID No. 78/2008

PLAC 14/2011

(Onthe file ofCGIT- cum-Labour Court at Hyderabad) (g) All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e. transfer, hours of work , days of rest , holidays etc. , for appointment afresh.

BETWEEN:

The Hon'ble Members may kindly take note of the above and pass consent award under section 21 of LSA Act, 1987.

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2011

Sri Nallatheegala Venkateswar , (EC NO . 2577354), S/o Posham , aged about 46 years , worked as Coal Filler at RK- 6 Incline , Singareni Collieries Company Limited , SrirampurArea ,

Srirampur, Adilabad Dist .

.. Petitioner

AND

1. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Rep. by its General Manager, Srirampur Area, Srirampur, Adilabad District .

का. आ. 1047.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( एलसीआईडी संख्या 78/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The Superintendent of Mines, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , RK-6 Incline , Srirampur, Adilabad Dist . Respondents [सं. एल-22013/1/2011- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] डी. एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 18th March , 2011

This case is coming up before the Lok Adalat on 10-01-2011 for settlement in the presence of the applicant appearing in person/represented by his counsel , Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy and the Respondent too , being present in person /represented by his counsel , Sri P.A.V.V.S. Sarma on a perusal of the case record , after considering and hearing the case of both sides and with the consent of both sides , the Lok Adalat has arrived at the following settlement and delivered the following :

S.O. 1047. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (LCID No. 78 / 2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SCCL and their workman , which wasreceivedbythe Central Government on 18-03-2011 .

AWARD Under Section 21 of the L.S.A. Act , 1987 [No. L- 22013 / 1 /2011 - IR(C - II) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

The Petitioner having agreed to the detailed proposals of the Management [ Clauses ( a) to (g ) ] , the contents ofwhich are read over and explained to him in 3083

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 16, 2011 /चैत्र 26, 1933

[भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

his language and agreed by him by signing the proposal sheet ( enclosed to the Award ) , the Respondent is directed to take him back to duty forthwith as , Badli Coal Filler afresh wherever coal filling is available .

This LCID is disposed of accordingly.

In agreement of the above, the parties/counsel have affixed their signatures/thumb impressions in the presence ofthe members of this Lok Adalat Bench .

Sd/- Sd/-

Signature of Applicant( s) Signature of Respondent(s ) Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Applicant (s)

Sd/-

Signature of Counsel for Respondent (s)

3. Sd/-

2. Sd/-

1. Sd/-

Signature ofPresiding Officer & Members of the Bench .

Note: This Award is final and binding on all the parties and no appeal shall lie to any court as per Sec . 21 (2) of the LSA Act, 1987.

T. PATTABHI RAMA RAO , Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

LCID No. 78/2008