This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD. NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

सत्यमेव जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 19]

नई दिल्ली, मई 1-मई 7, 2011 , शनिवार/वैशाख 11-वैशाख 17 , 1933 NEW DELHI, MAY 1- MAY 7, 2011 , SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 11- VAISAKHA 17, 1933

No. 19]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II -खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II Section 3 Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए संविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय

उड़ीसा राज्य के संबंध में करती है ।

(कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

[फा. सं. 228/26/2011- एवीडी- II ]

वी. एम. रत्नम , उप - सचिव नई दिल्ली, 2 मई , 2011

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(DepartmentofPersonnel and Training)

New Delhi , the 2nd May, 2011

S. O. 1242. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent ofthe State Government of Orissa vide Notifica tion No. 9165 /PR dated 23-4-2011 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Spe- cial Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Orissa for investigation of offences related to alleged large scale irregularities , misappropriation and diversion ofCentral Government Funds allocated to the State of का. आ. 1242. केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उड़ीसा राज्य सरकार की अधिसूचना सं. 9165/पीआर दिनांक 23-4-2011 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से उड़ीसा राज्य सरकार की उक्त अधिसूचना में वर्गीकृत 6 जिलों के 100 गांवों में वित्त वर्ष 2006-2007 के दौरान महात्मा गांधी राष्ट्रीय ग्रामीण रोजगार गांरटी स्कीम ( एमजीएनआरईजीएस ) के क्रियान्वयन के संबंध में उड़ीसा राज्य सरकार को आबंटित केंद्र सरकार की निधि के कथित बड़े पैमाने पर अनियमिताओं , दुर्विनियोग , विचलन से संबंधित अपराधों और प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षड्यंत्रों अथवा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किया गया अन्य कोई अपराध या अपराधों या उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस

(3481)

1410 GI /2011 3482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7,2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

committed in course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228 /27/2011 - AVD-II ] ASHOK K. K. MEENA , Director (V- II ) Orissa in connection with implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme ( MGNREGS ) during the financial year of 2006-2007 in 100 villages of 6 Districts specified in the aforesaid notification of the State Government of Orissa and attempt , abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the said offence /offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 4 मई , 2011 [F. No. 228/26/2011 -AVD- II] V. M. RATHNAM , Dy. Secy. नई दिल्ली , 6 मई , 2011

का. आ. 1244. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध )स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 9 के उपखंड ( 1 ) और ( 2 ) के साथ पठित , बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 के खंड (च) द्वारा प्रदत्त. शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतद्वारा , श्री बी. एन. भट्टाचार्जी ( जन्म तिथि 31-05-1954 ) , सहायक प्रबंधक, यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया को उनके नामित होने की तारीख से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा जब तक वे यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के अधिकारी के रूप में अपना पदभार नहीं छोड़ देते अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के निदेशक मण्डल में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा.सं. 9/24/2008 - बीओ -1 ] समीर के. सिन्हा, निदेशक

MINISTRY OF FINANCE का. आ. 1243. केंद्रीय सरकार एतद् द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मणिपुर राज्य सरकार, सचिवालय , गृह विभाग की अधिसूचना सं.6/1 ( 2 )/ 2011 एच ( यूएपी ) दिनांक 1 अप्रैल , 2011 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से ईरोम रोजर सिंह की हत्या के संबंध में सिंगजमीं पुलिस स्टेशन में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 302 और 34 तथा शस्त्र अधिनियम, 1959 (1959का अधिनियम सं. 54 ) की धारा 27 के अधीन दर्ज एफआईआर सं. 131 (3 ) 2011 और उक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण मणिपुर राज्य के संबंध में करती है ।

(Department of Financial Services ) New Delhi , the 4th May, 2011 [फा. सं. 228/27/2011 - एवीडी- II ] अशोक के. के. मीणा, निदेशक ( वी- II ) New Delhi , the 6th May, 2011

S. O. 1244.- In exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause ( f) of sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub - clause ( 1 ) & (2) of clause 9 of The Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/ 1980, the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri B. N. Bhattacharjee ( DOB : 31-05-1954 ) , Assistant Manager, Union Bank of India, as Officer Employee Director on the Board of Dirctors of Union Bank of India for a period of three years from the date of his nomination or until he ceases to be an officer of the Union Bank of India or until further orders , whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. 9/24/2008 -BO- I ] SAMIR K. SINHA , Director

नई दिल्ली, 4 मई , 2011 S. O. 1243. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent ofthe State Government of Manipur, Secretariat, Home Department, vide Notification No. 6/ 1 /(2)/2011- H(UAP) dated 1st April , 2011 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Manipur for investigation of FIR No. 131 (3) 2011 under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) registered at Singjamei Police Station relating to the Killing of Irom Roger Singh and attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offence and any other offence or offences

का. आ. 1245.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 (ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा श्री के. के. नायर ( जन्म तिथि 18-7-1941 ) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधि सूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा.सं. 6/8/2010 - बीओ-1 ]

समीर के. सिन्हा, निदेशक New Delhi , the 4th May, 2011

S. O. 1245.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section 3 ( h ) and ( 3 - A) of Section 9 of The Banking Companies ( Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub - clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of The Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri K. K. Nair (DOB: 18-7-1941 ) as part -time non- official director on the Board of Directors of Bank of India for a period of three years from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[ F. No. 6 /8 /2010-BO- I ] SAMIR K. SINHA , Director

(राजस्व विभाग )

सीमा एवं केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क के आयुक्त का कार्यालय हैदराबाद -1 आयुक्तालय

हैदराबाद , 5 मई , 2011 [( सं. 02/2011- सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. ) ] का. आ. 1246.-वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली केदिनांक 1-7-1994 की अधिसूचना सं. 33/94- सीमा शुल्क (एन. टी. ) यथासंशोधित एवं दिनांक 30-6-2004 की अधिसूचना सं. 83/2004- सीमा शुल्क ( एन. टी. ) के अनुसार सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं, निम्नलिखित गांवों को सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन सीमित प्रयोजनार्थ हेतु , भारत सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदित 100 % निर्यातोन्मुख उपक्रम स्थापित करने के लिए भण्डागार स्टेशन घोषित करता हूँ ।

क्रम सं. भण्डागार स्टेशन घोषित किये गए गांव का नाम 1. बशीराबाद गांव , कम्मरपल्लि मंडल , जिला निजामाबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश

2. कोनसमुन्दर गांव , कम्मरपल्लि मंडल , जिला निजामाबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश

[फा. सं. VIII /20/04/2011- कस्टम /टैक-1/हैदराबाद-1 ]

एस. एन. साहा , आयुक्त

3483

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

(Department ofRevenue )

(OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS , CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX) Hyderabad , the 5th May, 2011

[No. 2/2011 -CUS ( N.T) ]

S. O. 1246. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962delegated by Notification No. 33/94-Cus (N.T) dated 1-7-1994 as amended andNo. 83 /2004-Cus (N.T) dated 30-6-2004 issued by the Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I hereby declare the following villages as Warehousing Stations under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 for the limited purpose of setting up of 100 % Export Oriented Undertakings as approved by the Government of India .

Sl. No. Name ofthe Village declared as warehousing Station

1. Basheerabad Village of Kammarpally Mandal , Nizamabad District, Andhra Pradesh

2. Konasamundar Village of Kammarpally Mandal , Nizamabad District , Andhra Pradesh

[F. C.No. VIII/20/04/2011 - Cus /Tech - I /Hyd - 1 ] S. N. SAHA , Commissioner मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय ( उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) (राजभाषा प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 2 मई , 2011

का. आ. 1247.केंद्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ( नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम 4 केअनुसरण में मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित विश्वविद्यालयों तथा संस्थानों को , ऐसी संस्थाओं के रूप में , जिनमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है: -

1. राजस्थान केन्द्रीय विश्वविद्यालय , सिटी रोड, किशनगढ़-305802 जिला अजमेर , राजस्थान , भारत

2. झारखण्ड केन्द्रीय विश्वविद्यालय , ब्राम्बे , रातू- लोहरघाट रोड , ब्राम्बे, रॉची -835205

3. हरियाणा केन्द्रीय विश्वविद्यालय ( महिन्द्रगढ़ )

(वर्तमान में हरियाणा केन्द्रीय विश्वविद्यालय , गर्वन्मेंट बी.एड कॉलेज बिल्डिंग , नारनौल ( जिला महिन्द्रगढ़ ) हरियाणा 4. इलाहाबाद विश्वविद्यालय , इलाहाबाद-211001 उ.प्र. ( भारत ) 5. इंदिरा गांधी राष्ट्रीय जनजातीय विश्वविद्यालय , अमरकंटक , मध्यप्रदेश -484886 ( भारत )

6. हेमवती नन्दन बहुगुणा गढ़वाल विश्वविद्यालय , श्रीनगर , गढ़वाल-246174, उत्तराखण्ड 3484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 7. जामिया मिल्लिया इस्लामिया , मौलाना मोहम्मद अली जौहर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110025

5. Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak, Madhya Pradesh -484886 ( India)

6. Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar, Garhwal - 246 174, Uttarakhand 8. भारतीय विज्ञान शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , मोहाली ( वर्तमान में एम. जी. एस. आई. पी. ए. पी. परिसर , सेक्टर 26 , चंडीगढ़ -160019)

7. Jamia Millia Islamia, Maulana Mohammed Ali Jauhar Marg, New Delhi- 110025

9. डॉ. बी. आर. अम्बेडकर राष्ट्रीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान , जी. टी. रोड, बाई पास , जालंधर ( पंजाब ) -144011

10.

8. Indian Institute of Science Education & Research (IISER) , Mohali (Transit Campus- M.G.S.I.P.A.P. Complex, Sector 26, Chandigarh- 160019) राष्ट्रीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान , जी. ई. रोड , रायपुर-492010 (छ.ग.)

11.

9. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, G. T. Road, Bye Pass , Jalandhar- 144011 (Punjab) भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान राजस्थान , पुराना रेजीडेंसी रोड , रतनादा, जोधपुर-342011 ( राजस्थान )

10. National Institute ofTechnology Raipur , G. E. Road, Raipur-492010 (CG)

12. भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान मण्डी, मण्डी-175001 , हिमाचल प्रदेश , भारत

11. Indian Institute of Technology Rajasthan , Old Residency Road, Ratanada, Jodhpur - 34201 1 (Raj .) 13. भारतीय प्रबंध संस्थान , कोषिककोड, आई.आई.एम. ,कोषिककोड कैम्पस , पी.ओ. कुन्नामंगलम , केरल -673570

12. Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi- 175001, Himachal Pradesh, India

13. Indian Institute of Management , Kozhikode , IIM Kozhikode Campus P.O. Kunnamangalam , Kerala- 673570

14. भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान इंदौर , अभियांत्रिकी एवं प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान , डीएवीवी परिसर , खंडवा रोड , इंदौर-452017 , मध्य प्रदेश , भारत

[सं. 11011-1/2011 - रा.भा.ए. ] डॉ. अनिता भटनागर जैन , संयुक्त सचिव

14 Indian Institute of Technology Indore , Institute of Engineering and Technology, DA VV Campus , Khandwa Road, Indore-452017 , Madhya Pradesh , India

[No. 11011-1 /2011 -O.L.U . ] Dr. ANITA BHATNAGAR JAIN , Jt . Secy.

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Department ofHigher Education) (O. L. Division) New Delhi , the 2nd May, 2011

जल संसाधन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल , 2011

का, आ. 1248. केंद्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में इस मंत्रालय के केन्द्रीय भूमिजल बोर्ड, दक्षिण पूर्वी क्षेत्र , भुवनेश्वर कार्यालय को , जिसमें 80% कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है । $.O. 1247.-In pursuance of sub rule (4) ofrule 10 ofthe Official Language ( Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following Universities , Institutes under the Ministry ofHuman Resource Development, as the Offices , whose more than 80 % members ofthe staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi :-

[सं. 1/ 1/2008- हिन्दी] विजय कुमार , आर्थिक सलाहकार 1. Central University of Rajasthan , City Road , Kishangarh -305 802, District Ajmer , Rajasthan , India

MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES New Delhi , the 26th April , 2011 2. Central University of Jharkhand , Brambė, Ratu- Loharghat Road , Brambe, Ranchi - 835205

3. Central University of Haryana (Mahendergarh ) Temporary Camp Office: Govt. B.Ed. College Building, Narnaul ( Distt . Mahendergarh ) , Haryana

S. O. 1248.-In pursuance of Sub - Rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union) the Central Giovernment hereby notifies the Office of the Central Ground Water Board, South East Region , Bhubaneswar of this Ministry, the 80% staff whereof have aquired working knowledge of Hindi .

4. University ofAllahabad , Allahabad- 211002 , (U.P. ) ] (India)

[No. 1 / 1 /2008 -Hindi ] VIJAY KUMAR , Economic Advisor 3485 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

(भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1249.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

क्रम सं.

स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31अक्तूबर , 2010 आई एस 15893 : 2010/आई. एस. ओ. 10713 : 1992 आभूषण -स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु लेपन

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एमटीडी 10/टी-76 ] पी. घोष, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)

New Delhi , the 28th April, 2011

S.O. 1249. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl . No. No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. & Year of the Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31October , 2010 IS 15893 : 2010/ISO 10713 : 1992- Jewellery-GoldAlloy Coatings

Copy ofthis standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref : MTD 10/T-76]

P. GHOSH, Scientist ' F' & Head (MTD) 3486

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1250.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया /किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या

क्रम

स्थापित तिथि संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

और तिथि

31दिसम्बर , 2010

संशोधन संख्या 2 , दिसम्बर 2010

आई एस 13441 1992 इथाईल ईथर- सुरक्षा संहिता

इस भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सीएचडी 8/आईएस 13441 ] ई. देवेन्दर , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( रसायन )

NewDelhi , the28th April , 2011

S.O. 1250.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-

SCHEDULE

SiNo. No. and year of the Indian Standards

No. and Year of the

amendment

Date from which the amendment- shall have effect

31 December, 2010

Amendment No. 2 ,

December 2010

IS 13441 : 1992 Ethyl ether- code of safety

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CHD 8/IS 13441 ]

E. DEVENDAR, Sc .- ' F ' & Head ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1251.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया /किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्राम संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और. वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या

औरतिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

आई एस 2873 : 1991

दिसम्बर 2010

संशोधन संख्या 3 ,

दिसम्बर 2010

3487

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : टीएक्सडी/जी -25 ]

अनिल कुमार , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' ( टीएक्सडी)

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2011

S.O. 1251. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

No. and Year of the

amendment

No. and year of the Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

December 2010

1 IS 2873 : 1991

Amendment No.3 ,

December 2010

Copy of this Amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: TXD/G-25 ]

ANIL KUMAR, Sc.- ' E ' (Textiles)

नई दिल्ली, 28 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1252. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक की संख्या

क्रम

वर्ष और शीर्षक

सं.

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31 मई , 2011

आई एस 15138 : 2002 वस्त्रादि -

1. आई एस 15138 : 2010 वस्त्रादि 50

50कि ग्रा चीनी पैक करने के लिए

कि ग्रा चीनी पैक करने के लिए पटसन के

पटसन के बोरे विशिष्ट

बोरे - विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

अब यह भारतीय मानक बिक्री के लिये उपलब्ध होगा ।

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो के मुख्यालय मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , और इसके क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: टीएक्सडी/जी-25 ] अनिल कुमार, वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' ( टीएक्सडी) 3488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th April , 2011

S.O. 1252. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

Sl . No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards Established

(1)

(2)

1. IS 15138 : 2010 Textile - Jute Bags for Packing of 50 kg Sugar According to IS 15138 : 2010 SCHEDULE

No. andYear of the Indian Standards , if any superseded by the New Indian Standard

Date from which the Indian Standard shall have effect (3)

(4)

31May, 2011 IS 15138 : 2002 Textile - Jute bags for Packing of 50 kg sugar - Specification

Copy of this Indian Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: TXD/G-25 ]

ANIL KUMAR, Sc .- ' E' (Textiles)

नई दिल्ली , 2 मई , 2011

का.आ. 1253.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गए हैं वह स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

क्रम सं.

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

1. आई एस/ आई ई सी 62255-4 : 2006 ब्रॉडबैंड डिजीटल कम्युनिकेशन हेतु मल्टीकोर एवं सिमेट्रिकल युगल/क्वाड केबल ( हाई बिट रेट डिजीटलएक्सेस टेलीकम्युनिकेशन नेटवर्क्स ) संयंत्र के बाहर की केबल भाग 4 ऐरियल ड्रॉप केबल - खंड विशिष्टि

2. आई एस/ आई ई सी 62255-5 : 2006 ब्रॉडबैंड डिजीटल कम्युनिकेशन हेतु मल्टीकोर एवं सिमेट्रिकल युगल/क्वाड केबल ( हाई बिट रेट डिजीटलएक्सेस टेलीकम्युनिकेशन नेटवर्क्स ) संयंत्र के बाहर की केबल भाग 4 फिल्ड ड्रॉप केबल - खंड विशिष्टि

3. आई एस 616 : 2010/आई ई सी 60065 : 2005 श्रव्य , वीडियो एवं समान इलैक्ट्रॉनिकी उपकरण सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएँ ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण ) 4. आई एस / आई ई सी 61757-1 : 1998 प्रकाशिक तंतु सेंसर भाग 1 वर्गीय विशिष्टि अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(3)

(4)

अक्तूबर , 2010

मई, 2010

फरवरी , 2010 3489 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2).

(1)

अक्तूबर, 2010

5. आई एस 6873 ( भाग 1 ) 2010/सिसपर, 12 : 2007 रेडियो व्यधान लक्षणों की मापन पद्धतियां एवं सीमाएं भाग 1 वाहन , बोट तथा आन्तरिक दहन इंजन (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110 002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवंनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एल आई टी डी/जी-75 ]

न. सिंह , प्रमुख ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिकी एवं आई टी) Now Delhi, the 2nd May, 2011

S.O. 1253.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub-rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each

SCHEDULE

Date ofEstablished Sl.No. No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards Established

No.& Year ofthe Indian Standards, if any Superseded bythe New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

October, 2010 1. IS/IEC 62255-4: 2006 Multicore and symmetrical pair/quad cables forbroadband digital communica- tions (high bit rate digital access telecommunication networks)- outside plant cables Part 4Aerial drop cables-sectional specification

October, 2010 2. IS/IEC 62255-5: 2006 Multicore and symmetrical pair /quad cables forbroadbanddigital communica- tions (high bit rate digital access telecommunication networks)- outside plant cables Part 5 Filled drop cables- sectional specification

May, 2010

3. IS616:2010/IEC 60050 : 2005 Audio video and similar electronic apparatus Safety requirements (Forth Revision )

February,2010 4. IS/IEC 61757-1 : 1998 Fibre optic sensors Part 1 Generic specification

October,2010 5. IS6873(Part 1 ): 2010/CISPR 12: 2007 Limits and methods of measurements of radio disturbance characteristics

Part 1 Vehicles, boats and internal combustion engines (Third Revision)

[Ref: LITD/G-75] Copyofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi- 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and alsoBranch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

N. SINGH, Head Electonics & IT) 1410G /11-2 3490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नईदिल्ली, 3 मई, 2011

का.आं. 1254. भारतीय मान‌क ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उप - विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरी एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

अनु वर्ष क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

भामा भाग संख्या

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि वर्ष/माह

(1) (2 )

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6) ( 7 ) (8 ) ( 9 ) 1. 3669176 7-10-2010

694

1990

1100 बोल्ड तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी बी सी रोधित केबल-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स विशाल इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट सं. 60 , नारी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , नियर कामठी रोड, नारी टेलीफोन एक्स्चेंज के पीछे, नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440 026

2. 3671264, 7-10-2010

4984 1995

पानी की आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्व वाले पॉलिएथिলীগ पाइप-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स हाय- टेक पॉलिमर्स, ई-39 , एम आई डी सी हिंगणा , जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र

3. 3676779 22-10-2010

14343 2004

पैकेजबन्द पेथ अल ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स अजय वैनगंगा प्युर वाटर , प्लॉट सं. ए -57 , एम आइ डी सी , गडचिरोली, महाराष्ट्र-442605

4. 3679684 19-11-2010

2009

लोहे के स्पिगट तथा सॉकेट , अपक्षेन्द्री 3989 ढले (स्पन ) मल, अपशिष्टि, संवर्तिन और घरसाती पानी के पाइप , फिटिंग्स और सहायकांग-विशिष्टी

गोयल धातु उद्योग प्रा. लि. , ई-5 , एम आई डी सी बुटिबोरी, (स्टार इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया ) , बुटिबोरी, जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र

5. 3681065 22-11-2010

303 1989

सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लाईवुड विशिष्टी

मैसर्स मुंद्रा प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , 16 , के एभ माईल स्टोम , पी एच 20 , खसरा सं. 163/4 और 175/2 , महालगांव , सिटी कामठी, जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440 015

6. 3686782 15-12-2010 मैसर्स तावले एन्टरप्राइजेस ,

14543 2004

पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)-विशिष्टी

प्लॉट सं. एफ पी-10 , ऑरेंज सिटी फुड पार्क , फाइव स्टार इन्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया , एम आई डी सी , बुटीबोरी, जिला नागपुर ,

महाराष्ट्र-440 019 3491 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

( 8 ) (9 )

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1 )

2001

2831

4-1-2011

7. 3693173

निम्न तन्यता के संरचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेलन हेतु कार्बन इस्पात के ढलवों बिलेट इन्गट , बिलेट, ब्लुम व स्लैब-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स गोपानी आयर्न और पावर ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. , ए-22 , एम आई डी सी, ग्रोथ सेंटर , पोस्ट: तडाली , जिला चन्द्रपुर, महाराष्ट्र-442 406

2004

14543

पैकेजबन्द पेयजल ( पैकेजबन्द

8. 3695076 20-1-2011

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) -विशिष्टी

मैसर्स बिग विल इंडस्ट्रीज , एच सं. 1500/12, देविनगर , टेका नाका , कामठी रोड, जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440 017

[सं. सी एम डी 13:11 ]

एन. पी. कावले , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं ( प्रमुख ) , नागपुर शाखा कार्यालय , भा. मा. ब्यूरो

NewDelhi , the 3rd May,2011

S.O. 1254. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sec Year

IS No. Part

Title of the Standard

Licences Grant Date

Sl .

Name and Address of the Licensee

No. CM/L

No.

(8) (9)

(6) (7)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1990

694

M/s. Vishal Industries,

7-10-2010

1. 3669176

PlotNo.60,

Nari IndustrialArea,

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V Specification

B/HNari Telephone

Near Kamptee Road, Exchange, Nagpur, Maharashtra -440026

4984 1995 7-10-2010

2. 3671264

High density polyethylene pipes for potable water supplies Specification

M/s. Hi-Tech Polymers E-39 , MIDC Hingna, Distt.Nagpur Maharashtra

2004

14543

22-10-2010

3. 3676779

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

M/s . Ajay Wainganga Pure Water, Plot No.A- 57, MIDC, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra-442 605

3989 2009 19/11/2010

4. 3679684

M/s . Goyal Dhatu Udyog Pvt. Ltd. , E-5 , MIDC,

Centrifugally cast ( spun) iron spigot and socket soil , waste and ventilating pipes , fittings, and accessories Specification

Butibori , (Star Industries Area ), Butibori, Distt . Nagpur, Maharashtra 3492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKНА 17, 1933

( 1) (2) (3)

(4) 5. 3681065 22-11-2010 M/s . Mundra Plywood Industries Pvt . Ltd. , 16 Km . Mile Stone, Ph . No. 20 , Khasra No. 163/4 and 175/2, Mahalgaon , City Kamptee, Distt. Nagpur, Maharashtra -440015 6. 3686782 15-12-2010 M/ s . Tawale Enterprises, PlotNo. FP- 10, Orange City Food Park, Five Star IndustrialArea, MIDC, Butibori , Distt.Nagpur, Maharashtra -440019 7. 3693173 4-1-2011

M/s.Gopani Iron and Power (India) Pvt . Ltd., A-22, MIDCGrowth Centre , PostTadali, Distt. Chandrapur, Maharashtra-442406 8. 3695076 20-1-2011 M/s.Bigwill Industries, HNo. 1500/12 , Devinagar, TekaNaka, Kamptee Road, Distt.Nagpur, Maharashtra-440017

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] (5)

(6) (7) (8) (9)

1989

303

Plywood for general purposes specification

14543

2004 Packaged DrinkingWater (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

2001

2831

Carbon steel cast billet ingots, billets, blooms and slabs for re -rolling into low tensile structural-Specification

14543

2004 Packaged DrinkingWater (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

[No. CMD/13 :11]

N. P. KAWALE, Scientist ' F' and Head, Nagpur BranchOffice, BIS

नई दिल्ली , 3 मई , 2011.

का.आ. 1255.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 5 के उप नियन (5) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनको आगे दर्शायी गई जरीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है :-

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

सी एम/एल

1. 3626865 मैसर्स हरजीत स्टील इंडस्ट्रीज , -प्लॉट सं. 69-77, बंजारा ले- आउट, पोली नदी, कामठी रोड , नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र

2. 7964101 मैसर्स मुरली इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, सीमेंट युनीट नागंदा, तालुक कोरपना, जिला चंद्रपुर महाराष्ट्र-442401

अनुसूची

रद्द करने की तिथि लाइसेंस के अन्तर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का सीर्षक

14-12-2010 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च राष्ाि विरुपित इस्पात सरिए एवं तार- विसिष्टी आइ एस 1786 : 2008

3-1-2011 53 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट काइ एस 12269 : 1987

[सं. की एमडी 13:13 ] 3493 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 3rd May,2011

S.O. 1255. In pursuance of sub-regulation 6 of the regulation (5) ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars ofwhich are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:-

SCHEDULE

Dateof Cancellation Sl . No.

Name and Address ofthe Licensee

Licences No. CM/L

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled/suspension

14-12-2010 3626865

High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires for concrete reinforcement- Specification

IS1786:2008

M/sHarjeet Steel, Industries PlotNo. 69-77, Wanjara Layout, PiliNadi , KampteeRoad, Nagpur-440 026, Maharashtra

3-1-2011 7964101

53GradeOrdinary Portland Cement IS12269:1987

M/sMurli Industries Ltd. , Cement UnitNaganda, Taluka Corpana, Distt. Chandrapur, Maharashtra-442401

[No. CMD/13: 13 ]

N. P. KAWALE, Scientist ' F ' and Head Nagpur Branch Office,BIS

नई दिल्ली, 3 मई , 2011

का.आ. 1256.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उपविनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

अनु वर्ष

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

था मा भाग संख्या

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम संख्या

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि वर्ष/माह

( 8 ) ( 9 )

(6) (7)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

1990

12823

मैसर्स स्पेसवुड फरनिशर प्रा. लि. ,

31-3-2010

1. 3620449

लकड़ी के उत्पाद-पूर्वपरतकृत पार्टिकल बोर्ड विशिष्टि

टी-48, एम आइ डी सी,

हिंगणा रोड, नागपुर,

महासष्ट्र-440 016

1986

11087

31-3-2010

2. 3620550

पेपर फॉर मैगनेटिक इन्क करेक्टर रिकगनिशन चेक प्रिंटिंग विशिष्टि

प्रॉडक्ट्स प्रा. लि. ,

बल्लारपुर , जिला चंद्रपुर ,

मैसर्स बिल्ट ग्राफीक पेपर पीओ बल्लारपुर पेपर मिल्स, महाराष्ट्र-442 901

2004

14543

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द

6-4-2010

3. 3620651

प्राकृतिक मिनरल चल के

अलावा) विशिष्टी

मैसर्स श्री सिद्धी विनायक इंडस्ट्रीज, प्लॉट क्र . 1 , सर्वे क्र. 261, एट अजांती, तालुका हिंगणघाट, जिला वर्धा, महाराष्ट्र-442 301 3494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (1) ( 2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(7 ) (8 ) ( 9 )

(6)

4. 3621653 6-4-2010

14543

2004

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल (पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्टी

मैसर्स समर्थ इंडस्ट्रीज , डोंगरगांव, तालुका आरमोरी , जिला गडचिरोली, महाराष्ट्र-441208

5. 3622352 13-4-2010

1536

2001

जल गैस एवं मल के लिए उपकेन्द्री ढलवाँ ( स्पन ) लोहे के दाब पाइप- विशिष्टी

मैसर्स गोयल धातु उद्योग प्रा. लि. , ई-5 , एम आई डी सी बुट्टीबोरी , (स्टार इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया ) , बुट्टीबोरी, नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र

6. 3622659 20-4-2010

14543

2004

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) -विशिष्टी

मैसर्स ए ए बाबुजी एक्वा इंडस्ट्रीज , सर्वे क्र. 66/1 , प्लॉट क्र. 1 , हिंगणघाट, जिला वर्धा, महाराष्ट्र-442301

7. 3625358 26-4-2010

8329

2000

पानी गैस और मल जल के लिए अपकेन्द्रत ढले ( स्पन ) तन्य लोहा के दाब पाइप-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स टु फार्म इंजीनिअर्स, दूसरा क्र. 63 , विलेज खैरी , कामठी रोड, जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र-441002

8. 3626865 28-4-2010

1768 2008

कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च शक्ति विरुपित इस्पात सरिए एवं तार- विशिष्टी

मैसर्स हरजीत स्टील इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट क्र. 70-74, वंजारा ले- आउट , पीली नदी, कामठी रोड , नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440026

9. 3626158 29-4-2010

14543 2004

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स श्री अम्बे इंडस्ट्रीज , 90-91, श्रीराम नगर, बाबडे ले - आउट , वानाडोंगरी,. हिंगणा , जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440022

10. 3628566 5-5-2010

14151 2 1999

सिंचाई उपस्कर-स्प्रिंकलर पाइप- विशिष्टिभाग-2 : सहज संयोगी पॉलिएथिलीन पाइप

मैसर्स जयेस ट्यूब लिमिटेड, मौजा लोनारा , खसरा 196 , पी एच 12- ए कोराडी, जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र-441111

11. 3629770 14-5-2010

14543

2004

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) -विशिष्टी

मैसर्स एस ए बी डी इन्टरप्राइजेस एट-गोंडसावरी , पोस्ट रेजेपर , कोथा तालुका , लाखणी , जिला भंडारा , महाराष्ट्र-441804

3636767 2-6-2010

14543 2004

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) -विशिष्टी

मैसर्स सायरे इन्डस्ट्रीज , आनंदवन स्क्वेर , तालुका : वरोरा, जिला चंद्रपुर , महाराष्ट्र-442914

13. 3637163 2-6-2010

14543

2004

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स मंदाज एक्वा प्रॉडक्ट्स, एट कनगाँव, तालुका : हिंगणघाट, जिला वर्धा, महाराष्ट्र 3495 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 ,1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(7 ) (8 ) ( 9 )

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

14543 2004 3-6-2010

14. 3637870

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के

अलावा)-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स सत्यम फुड एंड बेवरेजेस , 34/1, मौजा पिपरी , तालुका: हिंगणा, जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र

2003

458

24-6-2010

15. 3642156

पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट पाइप ( प्रबलन सहित और रहित )- विशिष्टी

मैसर्स भारत स्पन पाइप्स , प्लॉट क्र. 82-ए-बी, मा उमीया आद्योगिक सहकारी वसाहत संस्था, भंडारा रोड, तातुका कामठी, जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र

14543 2004 12-7-2010

16. 3646568

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) -विशिष्टी

मैसर्स वत्सल एक्वा प्युर, 211 स्मॉल फैक्टरी , बगडगज , जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440010

1489 1 1991 16-7-2010

17. 3648269

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट भाग 1 : फ्लाएश बेस्ड

मैसर्स मुरली इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड , सीमेंट युनिट नारंदा, तालुका कोरपना , जिला चंद्रपुर, महाराष्ट्र-442401

14151 2 1999 21-7-2010

18. 3649372

सिंचाई उपस्कर- स्प्रिंकलर पाइप- विशिष्टी भाग-2: सहज संयोगी पॉलिएथिलीन पाइपं

मैसर्स हाय- टेक पॉलिमर्स, ई-39, एम आइ डी सी हिंगणा , जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र

14543 2004 22-7-2010

19. 3649675

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स सु- श्याम इन्डस्ट्रीज , भरतवाड , जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440023

14543 2004 11-8-2010

20. 3656369

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स राजकुमार इंडस्ट्रीयल अंडरटेकिंग प्लॉट क्र. ए-11 , एम आइ डी सी, तालुका हिंगणा , जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र-440028

4985 2000 16-8-2010

3656066

21.

पेय जल की पूर्ति के लिए असुघटियत पी वी सी पाइप -विशिष्टी

मैसर्स वी के इंडस्ट्रीज , 28, वंजारा ले-आउट, पीली नदी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , कामठी रोड , जिला नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र-440026

1417 1999 31-8-2010

22. 3660663

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहराकन-विशिष्टी

मैसर्स फॉरवर प्रेसिअस ज्वेलरी एण्डडायमंड्स लिमिटेड, प्लेटिना एन्क्लेव , नॉर्थ अंबाझरी रोड, हॉकर्ड हॉस्पीटल के समाने , धरमपेठ एक्स्टेंशन , शिवाजी नगर के पास , जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र-440010 3496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

23. 3664974 21-9-2010 मैसर्स खंडेलवाल ज्वेलर्स , (ए युनिट ऑफ डी एच खंडेलवाल कमर्शियल प्रा. लि. ) , 102 जुना जोशी मंगल कार्यालय , माता मंदिर रोड, लक्ष्मी भवन चौक, डब्ल्यू. एस वी रोड, धरमपेठ, जिला-नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र 24. 3665067 21-9-2010 मैसर्स खंडेलवालज्वेलर्स , (ए युनिट ऑफ डी एच खंडेलवाल कमर्शियल प्रा. लि. ) , 102 जुना जोशी मंगल कार्यालय , माता मंदीर रोड , लक्ष्मी भवन चौक , डब्ल्यू. एस वी रोड , धरमपेठ, जिला- नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र 25. 3667778 27-9-2010 मैसर्स गोपानी आयर्न एंड पावर (इ) प्रा. लि. , ए-22 , एम आई डी सी ग्रोथ सेंटर , पोस्ट- तडाली, जिला चंद्रपुर , महाराष्ट्र-442406 26. 3666877 27-9-2010

फ्लोर , वेस्ट हाई कोर्ट सेड, बजाज नगर रोड, जिला-नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र-40010 मैसर्स वामण हरी पेठे ज्वेलर्स , " लिला विस्ता " अपर ग्राउंड

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)) (5)

(6) ( 7) (8 ) ( 9 )

1417 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि

2112 2003 चांदी एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहसंकन-विशिष्टि

2830 1992 सामान्य संरचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवां इस्पात बिलेट इंगट, बिलेट, ब्लूम और स्लैब- विशिष्टि

1417 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि

[सं. सी एम डी 13:11 ]

एन. पी. कावणे , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं ( प्रमुख ) नागपुर शाखा कार्यालय , भा. मा. ब्यूरो

NewDelhi , the 3rd May, 2011

S.O. 1256.-In pursuance of sub -regulation (5) ofthe regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Grant Dated Name and Address of the Licences No. CM/L-

Sl. No.

Licensee

1) (2) (3)

(4) 1. 3620449 31-3-2010 M/s. Space Wood Furnishers Pvt . Ltd. , T-48 , MIDC, Higna Road, Nagpur, Maharashtra -440016 2. 3620550 31-3-2010 M/s.BiltGraphic Paper Products Limited, POBallarpur Paper Milla, Chandrapur, Ballarpur, Maharashtra-442901 Title of the Standard

ISNo. Part Sec Year (5)

(6) ( 7) (8) (9)

12823 1990 Prelaminated Particle Boards fromwood and other ligno- cellusicmaterial-Specification

Paper for magnetic ink character , 11087 recognition Cheque printing- -Specification 1986 3497 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 ,1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

( 7) (8 )

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

( 1)

2004

14543

6-4-2010

3. 3620651

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water ) Specification

M/s. Shri Siddhi Vinayak Industries , Plot No. 1, Survey No. 261 , AtAjanti , Taluka Hinganghat , Distt. Wardha, Maharashtra -442301

2004

14543

6-4-2010

4. 3621653

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)-Specification

M/s. Samarth Industries , Dongargaon, TalukaArmori , Distt. -Gadchiroli , Maharashtra-441208

2001

1536

13-4-2010

5. 3622352

Centrifugally cast (spun) iron pressure pipes for water, gas and sewage-Specification

M/s .. Goyal Dhatu Udyog Pvt . Ltd. , E-5 , MIDC, Butibori, (Star Industries Area), Butibori , Nagpur, Maharashtra

2004

14543

20-4-2010

6. 3624659

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

M/s . AA Babuji Aqua Industries , Survey No. 66/1 , Plot No. 1 , Hinganghat, Distt. Wardha, Maharashtra -442301

2000

8329

26-4-2010

7. 3625358

Centrifugally cast (spun) Ductile Iron pressure pipes for Water, Gas and sewage- Specification

M/s . Tru Form Engineers , Khasara No. 63 , VillageKhairy, Kamptee Road, Distt. Nagpur Maharashtra -441002

1786 2008 28-4-2010

8. 3626865

High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement

M/s.Harjeet Steel Industries , PlotNo. 70-74, Wanjara Lay out, Pili Nadi , KampteeRoad, Nagpur, Maharashtra-440026

2004

14543

20-4-2010

9. 3626158

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

M/s . Shree Ambe Industries , 90-91 , Shriram Nagar, Babade lay out, Wanadongari Hingna Distt . Nagpur, Maharashtra -440022

14151 2 1999 5-5-2010

10. 3628566

Irrigation Equipment- Sprinkler Pipes-Specification: Part 2: Quick Coupled Polyethylene Pipes

M/s . JeyesTubes Limited, Mouja Lonara, Khasara 196, Ph 12A, Koradi, Distt . Nagpur, Maharashtra -441111

14543 2004 14-5-2010

11. 3629770

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

M/s. Sabd Industries, At-Gondsavari , Post.- Rengepark Kotha, Tal-Lakhani, Distt. -Bhandara, Maharashtra -441804

1410 GI /11-3 $498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC.3 (ii )] ( 10 :

( 3))

(2) )

(4) (

(5)

(6) ( 7) (8 ) ( 9 ) 1243636767 2-6-2010

145432004

roo

PackagedDrinking Water (otherthan Packaged Natural Mineral Water)-Specification

M/ s. Sayare Industries , Anandwan Square TalukaWarorapte Distt. Chandrapur, Maharashtra -442914

13. 3637163 2-6-2010

14543

2004

lega Taluka -Hinganghat , wher

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

M/s . Mandaj Aqua Products , At Kangaoninho Distt, Wardha Maharashtra

14. 3637870 3-6-2010

14543

2004

TOLER

PackagedDrinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) Specification

M/ s. Satyam Food & Beveragesgutture 34/1 , Mouza Piparin Taluka Hingna bts Distt. Nagpur, Maharashtra

15. 3642156 24-6-2010

458 2003

Precast Concrete Pipes (with and without Reinforcement ) AAM

M/ s. Bharat Spun Pipes , PlotNo. 82A-B , Maa Umiya Audhogica ahakari Vasahat Sanstha, Bhandara Roadni Taluka Kamptee, Distt. Nagpur , Maharashtra

16.3646568 12-7-2010

14543

2004.

that

Packaged Drinking Water , (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water ) Specification

M/ s . Vatsal Aqua Pure, 211 , Simall Factory, Bagadgang, Distt .Nagpur, Maharashtra -440010

17. 3648269 16-10-2010

1489 1 1991

Portland Pozzolana Cement Part I Flyash based

2000

M/s . Murli Industries Ltd. , Tehsil Corpana , ne dgilt Cement Unit Naranda , Distt . Chandrapur, Maharashtra -4424010119 ed

18. 3649372 21-7-2010

14151 2 1999

Dist

M/s. Hi- Tech Polymers , E-39,-MIDC, Hingana, Distte Nagpuri Maharashtra

Irrigation Equipment Sprinkler Pipes-Specification : Part2Quick Coupled M Polyethylene Pipes/20.00

19. 3649675 22-7-2010

14543 2004

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water ) Specification

M / s . Su - Shyam Industrial , Bhara twada, Nagpur, Maharashtra -440023

20. 3656369 11-8-2010

14543 2004

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water ) Specification

M/s . Rajkumar Industrial Undertaking Plot No. A - 11, MIDC, Taluka Hingana, Distt. -Nagpur, Maharashtra - 440028

16-8-2010

213656066

49852000

Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Portable water supplies Specification

M/s. V. K. Industries, 28, Wanjara Layout, do) Pilinadi Industrial Area, Distt . Nagpur, KampteeRoad, Maharashtra - 440026 03499

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011/बैशाख 170 1933 BXAO

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

( 9 )

(7) (8)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1999

1417

180

31-8-2010

3660663

22.

अप्रेसन

Jewellery/Artefacts- Gold andGoldAlloys, Fineness Marking- Specification

M/ s . Forever Precious Platina Enclave, North, Ambazari Road , Opp . Wockhardt Hospital, Dharampeth, Extension, NR: Shivaji Nagar, Distt. Nagpur , Jewellery and Diamonds Ltd. , Maharashtra -440010

1999

1417

21-9-2010

23. 3664974

που μα

Gold and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts FinenessMarkingες Specification

( চোঁপান চলিষ্ণু সমিতি)

M/s. Khandelwal Jewellers (Aunit ofDH Khandelwal Commercial Pvt . Ltd. ), 102 Old Joshi Mangal Karyalaya, Mata Mandir Road, Laxmi Bhavan Chowk, W. S. V. Road , Dharampeth Distt . Nagpur, Maharashtra

2003

2112

21-9-2010

24. 3665067

एणडी एडी

Silver and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness Markinga Specification

M/s . Khandelwal Jwellers (A unit of DH Khandelwal CommercialPvt Ltd. ); 102Old Joshi Mangal Karyalaya, Mata Mandir Road, Laxmi Bhavan Chowk, W. S. V. Road, Dharampeth Distt. Nagpur, Maharashtra

1992

2830

27-9-2010

25. 3667778

Carbon Steel Cast, Billets , Blooms and Slabs for Re- rolling into Steel for general structural purposes- Specification

M/s . Gopani Iron and Power (India) Pvt . Ltd. , A- 22, MIDCGrowth Centre , PostTadali , Distt . Chandrapur, Maharashtra-442406

1999

1417

Gold and Gold Alloys ,

27-9-2010

26. 3666877

Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness Markingeti.c.2

Specification

FastaWest High Court Road ,

M/s . Waman Hari Pethe Jewellers "Leela Vista " , UpperGroundFloor , Bajaj Nagar , Distt. Nagpur Maharashtra -440010

[No.CMD/13 : 1 ]

N. P. KAWALE, Scientist ' F ' and Head Nagpur Branch Office, BIS

नई दिल्ली , 3 मई , 2011

का.आ. 1257 भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के नियम 5 के उप नियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विब्ररपा वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आसे दर्शासी गई तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है

Guane a wina Trg अनुसूची

रद्द करने की तिथि

लाइसेंस के अन्तर्गत वस्तु प्रक्रम

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम

क्रम लाइसेंस

मानक का शीर्षक

सम्बद्ध भारतीय

व पता

संख्या संख्या सी एम/एल

28-04-2010

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पेकेजबन्द

7951290

मैसर्स श्री. गणेश एन्टरप्राइजेस

: प्राकृतिक मितरल ज LOGIM

अलावा )-विशिष्टी आइ एस.14543/: 2004

सर्वे क्र. 145-155, विदुला एट हरदडा, पोस्ट धानाय

तालुका उमरखेड,

जिला- यवतमाल , महाराष्ट्र 3500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 2. 7339781

5-5-2010

पर्टिकुलर टाइप ऑफ वाईडिंग वायर्स- पार्ट 3 : पोलिस्टर एनॅमल्ड राउंड कॉपर, क्लास 155 आई एस 13730 पार्ट 3 1996

मैसर्स विदर्भ वाईडिंग वायर्स लिमिटेड, प्लॉट क्र सी-40/ए, एम आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , नागपुर-440028 महाराष्ट्र

3. 7226465

5-5-2010 मैसर्स विदर्भ वाईडिंग वायर्स लिमिटेड, प्लॉट क्र सी-40/ए, एम आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया, नागपुर-440028 महाराष्ट्र

पर्टिकुलर टाइप ऑफ वाईडिंग वायर्स- पार्ट 34 : पोलिस्टर एनॅमल्ड राउंड कॉपर, क्लास 130 आई एस 13730- पार्ट 34: 2000

4. 7964097

14-5-2010

43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट आई एस 8112 : 1989

मैसर्स मुरली इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, (सीमेंट युनीट नागंदा) , तालुक कोरपना , जिला चंद्रपुर-442401 महाराष्ट्र

5. 1768774

31-5-2010

पूर्वढलित कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित ) -विशिष्टी आई एस 458 : 2003

मैसर्स डॉलफिन हयुम पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट क्र टी-47 , एम आइ डी सी एरिया , हिंगणा रोड , नागपुर-440016, महाराष्ट्र

6. 7946705

21-7-2010 मैसर्स ए डी एक्वा इंडस्ट्रीज प्लॉट क्र 13 , सर्वे क्र 533 , उमरेर, जिला नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र-441203

पेकेजबन्द पेय जल (पेकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) - विशिष्टी आई एस 14543 : 2004

[सं. सी एम डी 13:13 ]

एन. पी. कावले , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख नागपुर शाखा कार्यालय , भा. मा. ब्यूरो

New Delhi , the 3rd May, 2011

S.O. 1257. In pursuance of sub - regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule have expired with effect from the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. Licences

No.

Name and Address of the Licensee

Article/ Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence

Dateof expiry (1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 1. 7951290

28-4-2010

Packaged Drinking Water (other than packaged natural mineral water) Specification IS 14543 : 2004

M/s . Shri Ganesh Enterprises , SurveyNo 145/155, At Hardada, Post Dhanora , Taluka Umerkhed Distt. Yavatmal , Maharashtra

2. 7339781

5-5-2010

Particular Type of Winding Wires- Part3 : Polyester Enameled Round Copper, Class 155 IS 13730 : Part3: 1996

M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd. , Plot No. C-40/A , MIDC Industrial Area , Nagpur-440028 Maharashtra .

3501 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

5-5-2010 7226465

Particular Type of Winding Wires- Part34: Polyester Enameled Round Copper, Class 130 IS 13730 : Part34:2000

M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd. , Plot No. C-40 /A, MIDC Industrial Area , Nagpur-440028 Maharashtra

14-5-2010 7964097

43Grade Ordinary Portland Cement IS8112: 1989

M/ s. Murli Industries Ltd. , Cement Unit Naganda, Taluka Coprana, Distt. Chandrapur , Maharashtra-442401

31-5-2010 1768774

Precaste concrete pipes (with and without reinforcement IS 458 : 2003

M/s. Dolphine Hume Pipe Industries , Plot No T-47, MIDC Area, Hingana Road, Nagpur-440016 Maharashtra

21-7-2010 7946705

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water )- Specification IS 14543 : 2004

M/s . A. D. Aqua Industries , Plot No. 13 , Survey No.533, Umrer, Distt Nagpur, Maharashtra -441203

[No. CMD/13 : 13 ]

N. P. KAWALE, Scientist ' F ' and Head Nagpur Branch Office, BIS

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई , 2011

का.आ. 1258.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्थापित हो गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम सं.

स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31अक्तूबर , 2010 1

आई एस 12192 : 1993/आईएसओ 7451 : 1983 मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी - द्रवचलित उत्खनित्रों- हो टाइप बकेट- आयतनी रेटिंग (पहला पुनरीक्षण )

आई एस/ आईएसओ 7451 : 2007 (आई एस 12192 : 1993 अतिक्रमण ) मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी- द्रवचलित उत्खनित्रों और बैक हो लोडर के लिए हो- टाइप और ग्रैब- टाइप बकेट का आयतनी रेटिंग

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एम. ई. डी. /जी-2 : 1 ]

जे. ए. सिद्दीकी, वैज्ञानिक- ई , निदेशक ( यांत्रिक इंजीनियरिंग ) 3502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 5th May, 2011

S.O. 1258.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

$I.No.

Date of Established No. and Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. & Year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded... by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1. IS/ISO 7451: 2007 ( Superseding IS 12192 : 1993 ) IS 12192 : 1993 / ISO 7451 : 1983 31 October, 2010 Earth moving machinery-Volumetric ratings for hoe-type and grab - type buckets of hydraulic excavators and backhoe loaders

Earth moving machinery hydraulic excavators-hoe - type buckets Volumetric ratings (First Revision ) ;

Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also BranchOffices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MED/G-2: 1 ]

J. A. SIDDIQUI , Sc . E, Director ( Mechanical Engineering)

नई दिल्ली, 5 मई , 2011

का.आ. 1259.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि सं. संशोधित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

30-04-2011 1. आई एस 3717:1977 - संशोधित द्वितीयक सीसा (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

संशोधन संख्या 1

अप्रैल 2011

इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 9/टी-36 ]

पी घोष , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

New Delhi , the 5th May, 2011

S.O. 1259. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No. No. and Title ofthe Standard(s)

No. & Year of the

Amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

( 4)

30-4-2011

IS3717: 1977-Specification for refined secondary lead (first revision)

Amendment No. 1

April, 2011

3503

ант

भारत का संजपत्र मई 7, 2011/वैशाख 17 , 19331 Тахло

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Copies of these amendents are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standandika Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also BranchOffices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MTD 9/T-36]

मदन एक एकरी

GHOSH, Sc : 'F' & ( Head (Met Engg .)

नई दिल्ली, 4 मई , 2011

का.आ. 1260.- भारतीय मान‌क ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 केः उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) को अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गये मानक(कों) में संशोधन किया गया किए गए हैं

अनुसूची

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या,

क्रम सं.

वर्ष और शीर्षक

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

जून 2011

अप्रैल, 2011

1 आई एस 14927 ( भाग 1 ) 2001

1 अगस्त, 2011

2, अप्रैल , 2011

2 आई एस 14930 ( भाग 1 ) 2001

इन भारतीय संशोधनों की प्रतियों भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नायपुर , पटत्ता, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

संदर्भ ईटी 14/टी-59 , टी-73 ]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञा. ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2011

S.O. 1260. In pursuance ofclause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Date from which the

No. & Year ofthe

No. and Year of the Indian Standards

Sl. No.

Amendment shall have effect

Amendment

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

June, 2011

1 April, 2011

IS14927 (Part1 ) : 2001 Cable Trunking and

1 Ducting Systems for Electrical Installations Part 1General Requirements ofить альтай

1August, 2011

2April, 2011

2 IS 14930 (Part 1 ) : 2001 Conduit Systems

for Electrical Installationsernet se du

Part 1 General Requirements

Copies oftheseAmendment are available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices ; Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET 14/T- 59, T-73 ]

R. K. TREHAN, Scientist 'E' &Head (Electrotechnical) 3504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5 ) नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल , 2011

अग्रहरा सोमरसन हल्लि 158

00 15 44

पटना

132

00 07 20

145

00 00 72

00 11 34

00 09 66

00 12 96

00 09 72

135

00 10 44

00 09

143

00 05 20

142

00 03 87 का.आ. 1261.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1390 तारीख 21-5-2010 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तालुका- कोलार, जिला-कोलार , राज्य-कर्नाटक में चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टि टर्मिनल , बेंगलूरु तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की

130

20 08 70

00 25 20

नीलकण्ठपुरा

00 04 38

00 00 62

मीठमल्लहल्ली

00 01 00 पाइपलाइन बिछाने के समय भूस्वामियों ने पंचनामा को स्वीकार क्रिया एवं इस मद में उचित भुगतान भी दिया गया जो अपने आप में सूचना की आवश्यकता भी पूरी करती है । अतः नियम 3 (3 ) का प्रावधान पूरा होता है;

00 05 22

00 04 32 और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

00 16 92

00 04 41

00 06 30

00 01 80 और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किं इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

00 95 40

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2007- ओ.आर. - 1 ] बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा- करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

New Delhi , the 29th April , 2011 और, केन्द्रीय सरकारं उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा

अनुसूची

जिला : कोलार

तालुका:कोलार

राज्य : कर्नाटक

गांव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं. उप-

क्षेत्रफल

खण्ड सं.

वर्ग

हेक्टेयर एयर

मी.

S.O.1261 . Whereas by the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , No. S.O. 1390 dated 21-5-2010 under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule relating to Taluka -Kolar, District- Kolar, State- Karnataka annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore by the Indian OilCorporation Limited;

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5 )

वडागेरे

00 05 16

00 00 12

At the time of laying pipeline the farmers have accepted panchanamas and received payment which itself isindividual notice;

130

00 30 77

स्वामीगला गोल्लाहल्लि

00 02 02

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(1)

3505

(4) ( 5 )

(3)

(2)

04 32

Mittamalahalli-Cond. 3

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 6 ofthe said Act , Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the Land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification ishereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting with the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State: Karnataka

District : Kolar

Taluk: Kolar

Area

Survey No./

Name ofthe Village

Are

Hect .

Sq. Mtr.

Sub -Division No.

(4 ) ( 5 )

(3 )

(2)

(1)

Vadagere

00 12

30 TI

130

00 02 Swamigalagollahalli 38

00 03 56

158

Agraharasomara-

sanahalli

132

Patna

145

11 34

09 66

12 96

00 10

135

09 43

05 20

143

00 03 87

142

130

Neelakantapura

00 04 38

00 00. 62

00. 01 Mittamalahalli

1410GI /11-4

00 04 21

30 2

[F. No. R-25011 /8/2007-OR-I ] B. K. DATTA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1262. केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. संख्या 1391 तारीख 21-5-2010 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तालुका मालुर , जिला-कोलार, राज्य-कर्नाटक में चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मनाली रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टिटर्मिनल , बैंगलुरू तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

पाइपलाइन बिछाने के समय भूस्वामियों ने पंचनामा को स्वीकार किया एवं इसमद में उचित भुगतान भी दिया गया जो अपने आप में सूचना की आवश्यकता भी पूरी करती है । अतः नियम 3 (3 ) का प्रावधान पूरा होता है;

और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्और यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है किउक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । 3506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

अनुसूची

(1) जिला: कोलार

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] (2)

(3) (4) (5)

राज्य: कर्नाटक

तालुका : मालुर

धाड्डाकडथुरु गांव का नाम

(जारी) सर्वेक्षण सं/उप-

क्षेत्रफल.

खण्डसं.

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मी.

(1 )

(2)

(3) ( 4) ( 5 )

कुंटोनहल्लि

00 16 65.

00 04 14

00 02 76

00 03 95

45/2

00 05 23

52/पी-1

00 04 06

00 16

नाचोहल्लि कारगुंट्टा

8/2

00 03 97

हारोहल्लि 16/पी-8

00 02 71 माडिवाला 36

निधरमंगला

00 02 37

50/5-बी

00 00 24

00 35 40

48/4

00 05

बावनहल्लि

20/2

00 00 67 चोकंडहल्लि 17/1

00 04 95

17/11

00 00 29

31/3

00 04 18

31/8

01 01

31/6

00 00 17

31/5

00 01 52

कडसनहल्लि

10/2

00 00 69

53/2

00 01 92 योशवन्तपुरा 39/2

00 06 39

00 04

16/1

00 05 64

पुरमाकनहल्लि

16/5

00 05 35

15/8

00 03

9/3

दोड्डाशिवारा

75/2

वडगनहल्लि

03 66

31/1

00 05 80

74/1

00 01

चिक्कासिवारा

00 06 88 थिम्मापुरा 49/1

00 03 46

70/7ए

धाड्‌डाकडथुरु

70/5

00 00 67 71/4

00 00 35 71/5

00 02 08 71/1

00 01 83 172

00 11 15 70/2

51 49/1बी

00 00 39 168

51 159

00 08 63 51

93 174

00 17 00 50/2

00 00 76 72

00 11 48 75/2

95 21/2

00 13 16 8/4

00 05 21 11

00 05 54

00 14

12/5ए

40 12/4

00 08 95 155/1

00 05 23 175

132/2

00 01 85 127

00 14 73 135/1

00 03 97 139/3

00 02 98 120/1

00 01 24 170/1

00 01 08 170/2

00 03 96 139/2

00 03 30 20/4

00 00 49 81/3

00 05 49 82/4-पी3

00 12 83 26/5

00 05 58

19/1

02 31 19/2

01 69 19/4

01 14

19/6-पी2

00 84 20/3

00 00 51 98/1

00 00 83 19/7

00 01

22 85/2

00 02 43 3

00 01 10 [फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2007- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1) NewDelhi , the 29th April , 2011

3507

(5 )

(4)

(3 )

(2)

00 03 97 8/2

Karangutta (Contd. )

00 05 63 16

16/P-8

Nidaramangala

50/5-B

48/4

0005

Bhuvanahalli

S.O. 1262. Whereas by notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , S.O. No. 1391 dated 21-5-2010 under sub -section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule relating to Taluka- Malur, District - Kolar, State- Karnataka annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

At the time of laying pipeline the farmers have accepted panchanamas and received payment which itself is individual notice;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

67 20/2

17/1

17/11

31/3

31/8

31/6

31/5

10/2

Kadasonnahalli

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right ofUser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

53/2

39/2

16/1

Puramakanahalli

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right ofUser inthe land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

Doddashivara

16/5

03 51

15/8

9/3

00 03

75/2

Vadaganahalli

And further, in exercise of the powers confened by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting with the Central Government, vests from the date of publication of this declaration in the IndianOil Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .

31/1

74/1

Chikkashivara

SCHEDULE

State : Karnataka

District: Kolar

Taluk: Malur

49/1

70/7A

Doddakadathuru

Area

Survey No./

Name ofthe Village

Hect- Are

Sub-Division

Sq. Mtr.

are

No.

(3) (4) (5)

(2)

(1)

Kuntanahalli

05 23

45/2

52/P-1

Karangutta

70/5

71/4

0002

71/5

71/1

172

70/2

00 00 39 49/1B

168

159

93 51

00 17

6000

174

0076

50/2 3508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

थी; उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की Nachohalli

00 11 48

75/2

Harohalli

21/2

00 13 16

Madivala

8/4

00 05 21

पाइपलाइन बिछाने के समय भूस्वामियों ने पंचनामा को स्वीकार किया एवं इस मद में उचित भुगतान भी दिया गया जो अपने आप में सूचना की आवश्यकता भी पूरी करती है । अतः नियम 3 ( 3 ) का प्रावधान पूरा होता है;

00 05 54

12/5A

00 14 40

12/4

00 08 95

और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है; 155/1

05 23

175

00 09 90

00 09 00

Chokkondahalli 132/2

00 01 85

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

127

00 14 73

135/1

00 03 97

139/3

00 02 98

120/1

00 01 24

170/1

00 01 08

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

170/2

00 03 96

139/2

00 03 30

20/4

Yeshavanthapura

00 49

81/3

00 05 49

82/4-P3

00 12 83

26/5

05 58

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

19/1

00 02 31

अनुसूची

19/2

19/4

00 01

जिला : कोलार

तालुका : मुलबागल

राज्य : कर्नाटक 19/6-P2

00 00 84 गांव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं./उप-

क्षेत्रफल 20/3

00 00 51

खण्डसं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग 98/1

00 83

(1)

(2)

19/7

(3) (4) (5)

01 22

85/2

चिक्कागुट्टाहल्लि

21/2

02 43

00 03 81 3

Trimmapura

जाथमंगलाअग्रहरा

94/पी

00 01 10

00 20 40

कीलागाणी

6/5

09 92 [F. No.R-25011 /8/2007-OR- 1 ]

00 00 61 B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

मेलागाणी

81/4

00 05 80 नई दिल्ली , 29 अप्रैल , 2011

26/1,2

00 07

150

00 01 83

77/4

00 27 58

77/1

00 03 94

पडाकास्ति

00 30 24

77/1,2

00 02 00

कन्नथा

40/2

00 06 30

कुरुबा चन्दुमनाहल्लि

00 05

2/1

00 00 88

47/1

00 03 07

00 02 34 का.आ. 1263.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962(1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. संख्या 1392 तारीख 21-5-2010 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तालुका- मुलबागल , जिला-कोलार, राज्य-कर्नाटक में चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टिटर्मिनल , बैंगलूर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] :

( 4) ( 5 )

(3 )

(2)

(1)

46/1,2

कुरुबा चन्दुमनाहल्लि

-जारी

00 13

116/10

चन्नापुरा

येडाहल्लि

10 67

105/पी 1-पी2

चित्थेरा

00 16

56/3

00 35

66/2

00 03

261/3

उरकुंटेमिटुरु

00 02 61

220

08 04

9/2

9/1

01 00

350/1

00 00 18

12 33

34/10

06 88

48/1

257/4

259/7

11/2

3509

At the time of laying pipeline the farmers have accepted panchanamas and received payment which itself is individual notice;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting with the Central Government , vests on the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State : Karnataka District : Kolar

Taluka: Mulbagal

00 02

16/1-पी।

Area

Survey No./

Name of the Village

03 00

41/1

आवलमारक्कालागट्टा

10 00

20/1

129/2

मिणिजेनहल्लि

(1)

17/2

03 Sub- Division Hect . Are Sq. Mtr.

No.

(3) (4) ( 5 ) (2)

03 81

21/2

Chikkaguttahalli

133/5

115

20 40

94/P

Jathamangala

22 Agrahara

27/4

00 07 92 Keelagani

122

बन्डहल्लि

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2007 -ओ.आर. - 1 ]

Melagani

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th April , 2011

Padakasti

Kannatha

Kurubara

S.O. 1263.- Whereas by the notification of Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , S.O. No. 1392 dated 21-5-2010 under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962-( 50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule relating to Taluka - Mulbagal , District- Kolar, State- Karnataka annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore by the Indian OilCorporation Limited;

09 92

6/5

00 61

05 80

81/4

00 07

26/1,2

150

77/4

00 03

77/1

30 24

02 00

77/ 1,2

06 30

40/2

05 25

00 88

2/1

Chadumanahalli

00 03 07 47/1

02 34

05 48

46/1,2

13 14 72 3510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) ( 5 )

116/10

Channapura

13 97

Yedahalli

00 13 66

पाइपलाइन बिछाने के समय भूस्वामियों ने पंचनामा को स्वीकार किया एवं इस मद में उचित भुगतान भी दिया गया जो अपने आप में सूचना की आवश्यकता भी पूरी करती है । अतः नियम 3 ( 3 ) का प्रावधान पूरा होता है;

105/P1 -P2

Chittheri

00 02 77

और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

56/3

00 16 37

00 00 70

00 01

66/2

00 35 00

Urukuntemitturu 261/3

00 03 48

220

00 02 61

9/2

00 08 04

9/1

00 05 35

350/1

00 01 00

00 00 18

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

34/10

00 12 33

48/1

00 06 88

257/4

04 88

259/7

25 48

11/2

00 09 58

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

16/1 -P1

00 02 50

00 03

Avalamarakalagatta 41/1

अनुसूची

20/1

10 00

तालुका: बंगारपेट

जिला : कोलार राज्य : कर्नाटक 129/2

Minijenhahalli

08 02

गांव का नाम

17/2

00 49 73

सर्वेक्षण सं./उप- खण्डसं.

133/5

हेक्टेयर

00 02

क्षेत्रफल एयर वर्ग

115

00 14 44 (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5 ) 27/4

0 22 जयमंगला

130/पी 2,3,10,19 00 18 00 Bandahalli

122

00 07 92

3/3

00 10 17

00 .09

146/पी1,2

36 [F. No.R- 25011 /8/2007 -OR- 1 ]

144/2

00 07 16 B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

153/1

00 06 55 नईदिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल , 2011

147/2

00 04 37

148/2

00 00 75

147/4

00 02 13

11/2

00 03 02

00 06 80

148/5

00 00 36

1/2

00 06 25

138

00 04 86

142/2

00 07 68

139

00 06 21

9/4

00 06 56

वादंडाहल्लि

00 12 28 का.आ. 1264.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. संख्या 1393 तारीख 21-5-2010 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तालुका- बंगारपेट , जिला- कोलार, राज्य-कर्नाटक में चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मनाली रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टिटर्मिनल , बैंगलूर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

00 07 63

00 07 62 3511

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

( 5 )

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

02 10

68/2

मुगालाबेले

वादंडाहल्लि-जारी

07 59

64/2

05 95

03 87

8/1,2,3,4

00 04 14

9/1

80.

124

5/2

00 92

कामण्डहल्ली

01 64

134/2

03 03

156/1

58/2पी1,2/पी2

17/ 1 ए, 1 बी, 2

माधमंगला

40/1

42/पी3

15/1

00 83

55/3पी4

05 30

सूलकुंटे

कंगानल्लुर

129

मावहल्लि

14/2

57/27,3,4,5,6,

02 07

10,14,20

103

48/1

57/19

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2007- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

58/1

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव

18/3बी

New Delhi , the 29th April , 2011

62/3

67/पी

नायकरहल्लि

51/1,2

78/4

25/1

68/2

79/3

S.O. 1264. Whereas by notification of Government ofIndia, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , S.O. No. 1393 dated 21-5-2010 under sub - section ( 1 ) ofSection 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule relating to Taluka- Bangarpet, District- Kolar, State- Karnataka annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited , Manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

63/1

25/3

00 02

At the time of laying pipeline the farmers have accepted panchanamas and received payment which itself is individual notice;

39/2

40/3

And whereas, the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;

00 00

79/1

68/1

68/3पी।

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right ofUser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

77/1

65/4

00 02

30/पी 11

अनिगानाहल्लि

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;

03 23

10/पी2 , ए, बी

अक्षेत्रगोल्लाहल्लि

00 71

And further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said 10/पी4 3512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

(1)

(2)

(5)

(3) (4)

Nayakarahalli

land shall instead of vesting with the Central Government , vests from the date of publication of this declaration inthe IndianOil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

00 04 03 SCHEDULE

Contd.

68/2

00 02 40

79/3

Taluk: Bangarpet

00 02 District : Kolar

State : Karnataka

63/1

00 04 14 Name ofthe Village

Area

Survey No.

25/3

00 15 91 Sub -Division

Are

Hect.

39/2

00 02 98 No.

Sq. Mtr.

00 00 42

40/3

(1)

00 (2)

01 10

(3) ( 4) ( 5 )

79/1

11 Jayamangala

130/P2,3,10,19 00

00 09 18 3/3

00 10 17

68/1

00 10 65 146/P1,2

00 09 36

68/3P1

00 07 41 144/2

00 07 16

77/1

00 03 95 153/1

00 06 55

65/4

03 147/2

00 04 37

00 02 92 148/2

00 00 75

30/P11

Aniganahalli

00 147/4

14 49

00 02 13

00 11/2

11 65

00 03 02

Akshanthragollahalli

10/P2, A, B

03 23

10/P4

148/5

00 71

00 36

68/2

Mugalabele

1/2

00 06

00 02

64/2

138

00 07 59

04 86

142/2

00 07 68

00 05 95 139

8/1,2,3,4

00 06

03 87

9/1

9/4

00 04

06 56

14 Vadandahalli

5/2

00 00

07 63

134/2

01 64

00 07 62

156/1

03 03

17 10

Madamangala

17/1A, 1B, 2

00 01 42

02 12

15/1

00 00

124

00 01 80

00 09 15

Sulikunte

00 00 90

00 03 50 Kamandahalli

00 07

00. 02 85

14/2

00 05 10

00 02 57

58/2P1,2/P2 00 04

40/1

00 03

00 02 07

103

42/P3

00 04 60

00 01 04 55/3P4

00 .00 83

[F. No.R-25011/8/2007-OR-I] 69

00 05 30

B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

Kanganalluru

00 23 40

Mayahalli

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल , 2011

129

00 12 05

00 02 66

57/27,3,4,5,6, 00 08 80

10,14,20

48/1

00 05 65

57/19

00 06 30

58/1

00 09 00

00 00 26

18/3B

00 06 21

62/3

00 06 48

Nayakarahalli

67/P

00 14 34

51/1/2

00 04 15

00 09 12

78/4

का.आ. 1265.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. संख्या 1394 तारीख 21-5-2010 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट तालुका-होसकोटे, जिला- बंगलुरू रूरल , राज्य-कर्नाटक में चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , मनाली रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टिटर्मिनल, बैंगलूर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

03 65

00 03 96

25/1

00 01 33

पाइपलाइन बिछाने के समय भूस्वामियों ने पंचनामा को स्वीकार किया एवं इस मद में उचित भुगतान भी दिया गया जो अपने आप में 3513 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

सूचना को आवश्यकता भी पूरी करती है । अतः नियम 3 ( 3 ) का प्रावधान पूरा होता है;

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule relating to Taluka- Hasakote, District- Bangluru Rural , State-Karnataka annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited , Manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Atthe time of laying pipeline the farmers have accepted panchanamas and received payment which itself is individual notice;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired ;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the Section 6 of the said Act, The Central Government hereby declares that the Right ofUser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

अनुसूची

राज्य: कर्नाटक

जिला : बेंगलुरु रुरल

तालुका : होसकोटे

सर्वेक्षण सं./उप-

गांव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

क्षेत्रफल एयर

खण्ड सं.

वर्ग मी.

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , The Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting with the Central Government , vests on the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .

(4) (5 )

(3)

(2)

(1)

SCHEDULE

55/1

बमनबांडे

38/3

Taluk: Hosakote District : Bangalore State : Karnataka

Rural

56/6

Area

55/3

Nameofthe Village

Are

Hect .

16/2सी

काजीहोसा हल्लि

Sq . Mtr.

Survey No./ Sub -Division No.

(3) (4) (5 )

(2)

(1)

16/2ए

55/1

16/2बी

Bammanabonde

38/3

36/3

बनहल्लि

00 09

56/6

31/1

55/3

30/2

16/2C

Kajihosahalli

88 31/3

00 39

03 68

16/2A

टिंडलु

16/2B

00 08

देवरगोल्लहल्ली

36/3

Banahalli

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2007- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

02 00

31/1

03 50

30/2

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव

00 30

31/3

New Delhi, the 29th April , 2011

Thindlu

Devaragollahalli

[F. No.R-25011 /8 /2007 -OR- I ] B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .

S.O. 1265. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, S.O. No. 1394 dated 21-5-2010 under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of

1410 GI /11-5 3514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[Part II Sec . 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 मई , 2011

का. आ. 1266.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2270 तारीख 31 अगस्त, 2010 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर काकीनाडा स्थित अपतटीय गैस प्रसंस्करण टर्मिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा विजयवाडा- नेल्लोर चेन्नई गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और, उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 24 पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ; दिसम्बर , 2010 को अथवा उससे और, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्वन्ध में , जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्नात कर दिया गया;

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारते सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और , भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः, अब, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;

और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के वजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

11 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

जिला:गुन्दूरू मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: पोन्नुरू

3515 राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं

गाँव का नाम

2 1

477

1 ) निडुब्रोलु

गट नंबर 477 में नहर बंड

गट नंबर 477 में नहर

480

521

गट नंबर 521 में रोड

522

गट नंबर 522 में नाला

525

626

829

838

476/4बी

476/4ए

476/7ए

476/6

476/8

481/1

482/2

482/3

504/1

505/1 बी

505/1 ए

520/1

520/2

520/3

520/4

523/1 ए

523/1बी

524/2

524/1

526/5

526/6

527/1

527/2

52.7/3

527/4 आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेतफल

सिएयर हेक्टेयर एयर

5 3

70 03

52 00

90 00

14 00

00 3516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

2 1) निडुब्रोलु (निरंतर)

527/5

535/1

535/2

535/3

536/2

536/1

537/3

537/1

537/ 2ए

538/1

538/2

540/6

540/7

548/2

627/7बी

627/ 6बी

828/1

828/2

839/2

840/4

840/1

840/2

840/3

841/1

842/1

2) जडावल्ली

20/2

20/1

22/3

3 ) चिन्तलापूडी

418

417/2

417/4

417/5

413/4

416/3

416/5

416/2

416/1

मुलुकुदुरू

221

222

235

279

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

00 20

00 00

54 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

280 4 ) मुलुकुदुरू (निरंतर )

281

300

309

317

319

370

373

382

410

431

433

445

446

468

471

416

298/3

298/5

298/6

298/7

298/8

298/9

298/10

301/10

301/11

302/1

302/2

307/2

307/4

307/5

307/6

307/7

307/8

307/9

308/1 ए

318/1

318/2

371/1

372/1

372/2

372/5

3517

65 05

89 32

52 84

40 94

39 14

47 81

96 26

07 13

10 00

48 01

42 05

51 09

67 00

21.

00 3518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

2 ) मुलुकुदुरू (निरंतर)

384/1

385/1

386/2

386/3

386/4

389/1

389/4

389/5

390/6

401/1

402/2

404/3

404/4

404/5

404/6

404/7

404/8

405/3

406/1

406/2

408/1

409/1

411/1

411/2

411/3

411/4

472/1

472/3

473/3

474/1

474/ 2ए

474/ 2बी मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: पिट्टालावानिपालेम

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

00 07

00 11

00 04

00 15

जिला: गुन्दूरू

1) कोमली

गट नंबर 1 में रास्ता

2/1ए

2/2

2/5ए

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: बापटला

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:गुन्दूरू

1) इतरू

गट नंबर 34 में नाला

गट नंबर 45 में नाला

183

राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश

00 02

00 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

215

1 ) ईतेरू (निरंतर)

216

218

329

332

345

349

गट नंबर 349 में रोल

384

385

391

35/2

42/14

42/15

43/1

43/2

46/3

46/4

52/4

53/2

54/1

54/2

54/4

54/5

55/1

55/2

55/3

58/1 ए

58/1बी

59/1

59/2

78/1

78/2

78/3

78/4

79/1

179/1

179/2

179/3

179/4

179/7

217/3

3519

35 00

32 08

84 02

86 27

29 03

57 06

10 00

59 20

85 16

01 09

96 05

15 00

75 01

61 00

49 03

10 45

38 00

90 00

00 3520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

219/1

1 ) इतेरू (निरंतर)

219/2

219/3

219/4

219/5

219/6ए

219/7

219/8

219/9

219/10

298/2

298/3

298/4

298/6

298/5

298/7

298/8

299/1

300/1

300/2

300/4

301/1

301/2

314/1

314/2

316/1

316/2

317/2

317/6

317/5

317/7बी

317/7सी

318/2

320/1बी

321/1

321/ 2ए

322/1

322/2

330/1

330/2

330/3

330/4

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )]

3 .

5 00

00 15

00 06

46 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

346/1 ) इतेरू (निरंतर)

346/2

346/3

346/4

347/1ए

350/10

350/11

350/12

350/7

350/8

350/13

350/9

371/13

386/1ए

386/2बी

387/2

387/3

387/1

387/4

392/8

392/9

392/10

393/1

393/2

393/3

393/4

394/1

400/1

401/1

390/15

179 2 ) पून्डला

180

212

213

गट नंबर 213 में तलाब

214

215

227

232

255

258

260 1410GI /11-6

3521

00 00

93. 10

40 34

75 27

70 00 20

38 02

00 03

79 17

52 00

65 10

87 17

75 35

74 00

17 00

99 00

54 24

62 03

01 12

65 24

06 00

74 01

64 00

39 09

47 00 14

77 13

80 00 05

10 12

77 35

73 06

00 3522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

2 2 ) पून्डला (निरंतर)

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

गट नंबर 260 में पालवा टैंक

262

413

422

423

424

426

427

430

431

435

436

444

445

546

552

555

556

558

177/4

178/1

178/2

178/3

178/4

178/5

218/4

218/3

218/1

219/16बी

219/17

229/2

229/1

233/1 बी

233/1ए

233/ 2बी

234/1

256/2

263/1

263/2

264/2

421/1

421/2

00 48

00 00

18 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख17 , 1933

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

421/3 2) पून्डला (निरंतर)

437/2

437/1

438/3

547/1

547/2

547/3

547/5

547/6

549/2

549/1

551/3

554/3

329

3 ) चेरुवु

334

335

337

338

340

341

344

345

364

372

380

389

391

392

394

820

828

908

916

919

942

943

945

959

962

963

964

973

3523

98 18

99 41

68 00

49 02

85 00

77 49

35 05

32 01

31 42

40 29

55 26

44 28

55 42

22 00

38 00

00 3524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

2 3 ) चेहुवु (निरंतर)

363/1 ए

363/1बी

363/ 2ए

365/1

373/2

374/1

374/2

379/1

382/1

382/ 2ए

382/2बी

382/3

382/4

383/3

383/4

393/2

912/3

912/4

912/2

913/1

913/2

913/3

914/3

915/2

915/3

915/4

915/5

920/3

920/2

946/1

946/2

965/1

974/2

974/1

975/1

1/1

4 मूलापालेम

5 ) जम्मुलापालेम

115

139

148

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

00 00

00 14

00. 20

97 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

155 5 ) जम्मुलापालेम (निरंतर)

156

157

161

162

165

166

167

170

171

172

180

74/2

74/5

74/1

116/4

118/1

119/1बी

119/ 2बी

120/3वी

120/4ए

121/1

122/1

122/2ए

124/2

128/1

128/2

128/3

129/2डी

131/4

131/3

136/1ए

136/2

137/1

138/2ए

138/1

140/12

141/1

143/3

144/2सी

147/3

154/2

3525

-18

52 07

60 06

44 00 09

04 09

48 12

30 01

82 00

87 00

09 08

00 3526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

154/1

5 ) जम्मुलापालेम (निरंतर )

177/4ए

177/4बी

177/3बी

177/3ए

177/ 2ए

177/1 ए

178/3

178/2

178/1

179/1

6) कन्कटापालेम

268

269

274

284

285

290

291

294

295

299

300

301

302

305

306

307

309

310

311

312

314

317

318

322

324

328

330

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

00 06

00 14

37 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 ,1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

331 6 ) कन्कटापालेम (निरंतर)

335

14/1.

14/2

14/3

16/1

16/2

17/1

17/2

17/3

270/1

270/2

275/1

275/2

278/1

278/2

278/3

279/1

279/2

319/1

319/2

326/1

326/2

337/1

337/2

338/1

338/2

161 7 ) मुरूकोन्डापाडु

164

165

166

170

216

223

224

338

344

347

348

354

355

395

3527

00 07

00 00

12 06

00.

69 00

86 00

28 00

26 29

14 24

12 26

33 48

24 22

70 00

99 00

10 13

07 16

63 20

16 14

30 31

48 32

61 01

00 3528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

403

१ ) मुरूकोन्डापाडु (निरंतर)

407

424

435

436

468

469

869

212/7

212/4

212/3

213/2ए

213/2बी

213/1

215/1

215/2

217/1/1

217/1/2

217/1/बी

217/2

220/3

220/1 बी

220/ 2बी:

220/2ए

227/1

227/2

228/1

228/2

228/3

228/4

279/1

337/1

343/1

343/3

350/1/ए

350/1/बी

350/2

351/1

351/2

352/2

353/1

353/2

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

30.

00 04

00 11

30-

00 00

92 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

356/1

7 ) मुरूकोन्डापाडु (निरंतर)

356/2

356/3

357/2

400/3

400/2

400/1

401/2

401/1

408/2

408/1

411/4

411/3

412/6

412/5

412/4

421/2

421/1

422/2

427/4

427/3

427/2

430/3

433/4

433/3

433/5

434/5

434/4

434/3

434/2

434/1

445/3

445/2

470/4

470/3

470/2

470/1 1410 GI /11-7

3529

00.

[फा सं. एल.- 14014/43/2010-जी.पी. ] के. के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव 3530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 3rd May, 2011

S. O. 1266. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2270 dated 31st August, 2010, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Vijayawada -Nellore -Chennai gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from on - shore gas processing terminal at Kakinada on East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited by M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on orbefore 24th December, 2010;

And whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has, under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;

And whereas, Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, free from all encumbrances .

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3531

Schedule

District:Guntur Mandal/Tehsil/ Taluk: Ponnur

Village

Survey No./Sub-Division No.

2 1

477

1 ) Nidubrolu

State:Andhra Pradesh

Area tớ bể đégütred for Rou Hec

C-Are

Are

5 3

Canal Bund in Gat No.477

Canal in Gat No.477

480

521

Road in Gat No.521

522

Nala in Gat No.522

525

626

829

838"

476/4B

476/4A

476/7A

476/6

476/8

481/1

482/2

482/3

504/1

505/1B

505/ 1A

520/1

520/2

520/3

520/4

523/1A

523/1B

524/2

524/1

526/5

526/6

527/1

527/2

527/3

527/4

88 3532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

2 1) Nidubrolu (Contd)

527/5

535/1

535/2

535/3

536/2

536/1

537/3

537/1

537/ 2A

538/1

538/2

540/6

540/7

548/2

627/ 7B

627/6B

828/1

828/2

839/2

840/4

840/1

840/2

840/3

841/1

842/1

2) Jadavalli

20/2

20/1

22/3

3 ) Chintalapudi

418

417/2

417/4

417/5

413/4

416/3

416/5

416/2

416/1

4 Mulukuduru

221

222

235

279

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)] 3

5 00

54 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

280 4) Mulukuduru (Contd)

281

300

309

317

319

370

373

382

410

431

433

445

446

468

471

416

298/3

298/5

298/6

298/7

298/8

298/9

298/10

301/10

301/11

302/1

302/2

307/2

307/4

307/5

307/6

307/7

307/8

307/9

308/1A

318/1

318/2

371/1

372/1

372/2

372/5

3533

61. 12

75 00

56 14

23 00

50 00

35 00

81 00

64 00

35 00

00 3534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

2 4) Mulukuduru(Contd)

384/1

385/1

386/2

386/3

386/4

389/1

389/4

389/5

390/6

401/1

402/2

404/3

404/4

404/5

404/6

404/7

404/8

405/3

406/1

406/2

408/1

409/1

411/1

411/2

411/3

411/4

472/1

472/3

473/3

474/1

474/2A

474/2B

Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Pittalavanipale DistrictGuntur 1) Komali

Cart Track in Gat No.1

2/ 1A

2/2

2/ 5A

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk: Bapatla

District: Guntur 1) Iteru

Nala in Gat No.34

Nala in Gat No.45

183

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

83 00

89 00

25 00

State:Andhra Pradesh

State: Andhra Pradesh

00 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख17, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

215

1) Iteru (Contd)

216

218

329

332

345

349

Road in Gat No.349

384

385

391

35/2

42/14

42/15

43/1

43/2

46/3

46/4

52/4

53/2

54/1

54/2

54/4

54/5

55/1

55/2

55/3

58/ 1A

58/1B

59/1

59/2

78/1

78/2

78/3

78/4

79/1

179/1

179/2

179/3

179/4

179/7

217/3

3535

5 00

90 B536

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

2 1) Iteru(Contd)

219/1

219/2

219/3

219/4

219/5

219/6A

219/7

219/8

219/9

219/10

298/2

298/3

298/4

298/6

298/5

298/7

298/8

299/1

300/1

300/2

300/4

301/1

301/2

314/1

314/2

316/1

316/2

317/2

317/6

317/5

317/ 7B

317/ 7C

318/2

320/1B

321/1

321 /2A

322/1

322/2

330/1

330/2

330/3

330/4

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

46 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

2 1

346/1 1) Iteru (Contd)

346/2

346/3

346/4

347/1A

350/10

350/11

350/12

350/7

350/8

350/13

350/9

371/13

386/1A

386/2B

387/2

387/3

387/1

387/4

392/8

392/9

392/10

393/1

393/2

393/3

393/4

394/1

400/1

401/1

390/15

179

2 ) Pundla

180

212

213

Pond in Gat No.213

214

215

227

232

255

258

260

1410 GI/11-8

3537 3

.10

06 3538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

2 2) Pundla (Contd)

[Part 11-- Sec. 3 ( ii)] 3

5 00

Palava Tank in Gat No.260

262

413

422

423

424

426

427

430

431

435

436

444

445

546

552

555

556

558

177/4

178/1

178/2

178/3

178/4

178/5

218/4

218/3

218/1

219/16B

219/17

229/2

229/1

233/ 1B

233/ 1A

233/2B

234/1

256/2

263/1

263/2

264/2

421/1

421/2

18 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

421/3 2) Pundla (Contd)

437/2

437/1

438/3

547/1

547/2

547/3

547/5

547/6

549/2

549/1

551/3

554/3

329

3 ) Cheruvu

334

335

337

338

340

341

344

345

364

372

380

389

391

392

394

820

828

908

916

919

942

943

945

959

962

963

964

973

3539

81. 21

74 23

98 18

99 41

68 31

77 49

32.

49 00

31.

00 3540

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

2 3) Cheruvu( Contd)

363/1A

363/1B

363/2A

365/1

373/2

374/1

374/2

379/1

382/1

382/ 2A

382/2B

382/3

382/4

383/3

383/4

393/2

912/3

912/4

912/2

913/1

913/2

913/3

914/3

915/2

915/3

915/4

915/5

920/3

920/2

946/1

946/2

965/1

974/2

974/1

975/1

) Mulapalem

1/1

) Zammulapalem

115

139

148

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii )] 3

5 00

39 00

.00

97 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2 1

155

5) Zammulapalem ( Contd)

156

157

161

162

165

166

167

170

171

172

180

74/2

74/5

74/1

116/4

118/1

119/ 1B

119/2B

120/3B

120/4A

121/1

122/1

122/ 2A

124/2

128/1

128/2

128/3

129/2D

131/4

131/3

136/ 1A

136/2

137/1

138/ 2A

138/1

140/12

141/1

143/3

144/2C

147/3

154/2

3541

09 08

50 00

10 00

00 3542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

2 5) Zammulapalem(Contd)

154/1

177/4A

177/4B

177/3B

177/ 3A

177/2A

177/1A

178/3

178/2

178/1

179/1

6 ) Kankatapalem

268

269

274

284

285

290

291

294

295

299

300

301

302

305

306

307

309

310

311

312

314

317

318

322

324

328

330

[Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

37 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

331

6) Kankatapalem (Contd)

335

14/1

14/2

14/3

16/1

16/2

17/1

17/2

17/3

270/1

270/2

275/1

275/2

278/1

278/2

278/3

279/1

279/2

319/1

319/2

326/1

326/2

337/1

337/2

338/1

338/2

161 7 ) Murukondapadu

164

165

166

170

216

223

224

338

344

347

348

354

355

395

3543

5 3

40 00

79 06

90 00

21 00

28 00

00 3544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933 ..

2 7) Murukondapadu ( Contd)

403

407

424

435

436

468

469

869

212/7

212/4

212/3

213 /2A

213/2B

213/1

215/1

215/2

217/ 1A/ 1

217/ 1A/ 2

217/1/B

217/2

220/3

220/ 1B

220/2B

220/ 2A

227/1

227/2

228/1

228/2

228/3

228/4

279/1

337/1

343/1

343/3

350/1 /A

350/1/B

350/2

351/1

351/2

352/2

353/1

353/2

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii )] 3

5 00

92 भारत का राजपत्र: मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

356/1 7) Murukondapadu (Contd)

356/2

356/3

357/2

400/3

400/2

400/1

401/2

401/1

408/2

408/1

411/4

411/3

412/6

412/5

412/4

421/2

421/1

422/2

427/4

427/3

427/2

430/3

433/4

433/3

433/5

434/5

434/4

434/3

434/2

434/1

445/3

445/2

470/4

470/3

470/2

470/1 1410GI /11-9

3545

[F. No. L-14014/43/2010-G.P. ] K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy.

3546

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 / VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 11 अप्रैल , 2011

" KYA B.C.C.L. (KUSTORE KSHETRA ) DWARA SHRI SURESH RAM KOU.G. MUNSHI KEY PAD PAR NIYAMIT NA KIYA JANA NAYOCHIT HAIN YADI NAHI TO WEI KIS RAHAT KEY PATRA HAIN ?"

का.आ. 1267. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/133/1997- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

NewDelhi , the 11th April , 2011

S.O. 1267. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/1999 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- 2 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011 .

[No. L -20012/ 133/ 1997- IR(C-I) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

2. The case of the workman as sponsored by the Union is that workman Suresh Ram though originally designated Timber Mazdoor yet has been working as the Underground Munshi since 18-9-89 as per direction and authorisation of the management to its satisfaction. He has been working accordingly in exigency against permanent vacancy, having put in more than 240 days attendance in each calendar year. His representation before the management for his regularisation as the Underground Munshi and payment of wages as per NCWAs just as the conciliation preceding raised by the Union before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Dhanbad due to the anti - labour attitude of the management brought about failure.When the Government of India, Ministry of Labour atfirst instance refused to refer the dispute for adjudication, onits challenge by the Union , as per order of the Hon'ble High Court Patna ( Ranchi Bench) in C.W.J.C. No. 1683/ 98 (R), the Ministry referred the dispute for adjudication. The action of the management refusing his regularisation and payment of his wages as Under Ground Munshi was illagal , arbitrary, unjustified and against the principle of natural justice, as well as vindictive.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : SHRI KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10.

(1)(d)) ofthe I. D. Act, 1947

3. On the other hand the case of the management with specific denials to the aforesaid facts of the Union is that the workman was a Timber Mazdoor , but he was not employed continuously as Underground Munshi except occassionally whenever required , He never put in his continuous service as the Underground Munshi for 190 days . So the demand of the workman for regulari sation as Under ground Munshi is baseless and false , hence inconsiderable .

Reference No. 15 of 1999

4. FINDING WITH REASONS

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of BCCL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

In this case in support of the claim of the workman WW- 1 Suresh Ram ( the workman himself) has been examined on behalf of the Union/ work , MW- 1 Uday Bahadur Kurmi as the P. O.'s Clerk on behalf of the management:

On behalf of the workman : None On behalf of the employers : Mr. H. Nath , Advocate

State: Jharkhand.

Industry: Coal.

dated, Dhanbad, the 21st March , 2011

Onthe scrutiny of the oral and documentary proofs adduced on behalf of both the parties in this case I find the facts indisputable are as under:--

AWARD

i. The workman is Timber Mazdoor, a time rated employee of the management .

ii . He is non -Matric till date.

The Government of India Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1)(d) ofthe I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/133/97- IR(C- I) dated , the 6th January, 1999.

5. As per his averment workman Suresh Ram as WWI has stated to have been appointed as Timber Mazdoor on 26-10-76 at Kustore Colliery. But he began to 3547 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

discharge his duty as Underground Munshi from 18-9-89 as per the order of the management, and since then he completed his attendance for more than 240 days each year as the Underground Munshi which would be aparent from the Form - C and Form - IV A registers if produced by the management . His further statement is that in the year 1994 he was show caused as per the management's letter dt . 12-6-94 ( Ext . W- 1 ) disclosing his designation as Underground Munshi and that he was issued the Office Orders (Ext . W- 2 and W- 3 ) (both the official orders dated 4-5-2002 and 1-1-2003 respectively) , accordingly disclosing his designation as Underground Munshi ; moreover, he has proved a photo copy of his representation as Ext . W-4 for his regularisation . On the scrutiny of aforesaid documentary proofs ( Ex . W- 1 , W-2 and W- 3 as well as Ext . W-4), the claim ofthe workman for regularisation is based on his disclosure " working as U.G. Munshi only as per order ofthe management dated 12-6-94 , 4-5-02, 01-01-02 " , outof which the aforesaid official order dated 12-6-94 as a show cause was issued to him as a last warning for improving the standard of loading in his shift and the rest aforesaid two official orders prove the posting of the workman as working U. G. Munshi . But none of the documents proves the continuity of his service as U.G. Munshi for 240 days/ minimum requisite 190 days in a calendar year .

ground, the nature of their work, the type ofthe work and the days of the work are ascertainable from the Form-C Register, maintained in accordance with the Mines act , so his unpleaded evidence concerning the non - availability of theAttendance Register and Muster roll from the year 1989 till date on account of their destruction by mice in the store concerned is untenable . Moreover, disinclination of the management to submit any called for document as aparent froin the order sheet dated 3-5-05 as per Order ofthe Tribunal dated 27-8-04 passed over the petition of the workman calling for the documents concerned including the aforesaid Form -C/Attendance Register for the said period despite its one copy having been received on behalf of the managment on the same date, clearly proves the managemnet has failed to discharge its liability for the production of the aforesaid relevant register before the Tribunal . Under the circumstances , the plea or the evidence as to non -availability or destruction ofthe aforesaid relevant register is unsustainable and adverse inference can be drawn from the conduct of the management at the particular issue of regularisation : Had the management produced the aforesaid relevant statutory register Form -C, it would have been a decisive factor in the decision of the issue . But unfortunately the management did not come up with the clean hand for justice.

6. On the otherside proving the letter dated 22-7-96 of Shri D. Mukherjee , the notice dated 14-8-96 issued by ALC (C ) , Dhanbad -IV to the G.. M. and others , and the reply of the Area Personnel Manager, Kustore Area dated 24-9-96 as Extts . M - 1 , M - 2 and M-3 respectevely at the relevant time of the conciliation of the I.D. under consideration , formally, MW- 1 , Uday Bahadur Kurmi the P. O.'sclerk has stated that the workman is still getting the salary of Timber Mazdoor. He also produced the letter issued by the Headquarters to all the General Manager which has been marked as ' X ' for identification . This letter ofBCCL issued on 1-7-92 is a prohibitory direction to the area authorities for not providing any matriculate or non- matriculate personnel the clerical job ofAttendance Clerk, Munshi etc. without express permission from the Headquarters . The Area Personnel Manager of Kustore Area by his letter dated 23-9-96 (Ext . M-3 ) as a reply to the aforesaid notice of the ALC ( C), Dhanbad appears to have responded that workman Suresh Ram being a Non- Matriculate could not be placed in Clerical Grade as U.G. Munshi . But the documentary evidence namely the Management's letter dated 4-5-02 and 1-1-03 ( Exts . W-3 and W- 4 respectively ) prove the posting of the workman as working U.G.. Munshi in the year 2002 and 2003 despite the aforesaid letter dated 1-7-92 which was issued by the BCCL. Headquarters . It stands clear due to the gross mistake on the part of the local authorities the workman though a Timber Mazdoor and non - matriculats yet was engaged as U.G.. Munshi for the aforesaid years consequtively.

8. Shri H. Nath , Ld . Advocate for the management submits that the present workman was though appointed as a Timber Mazdoor , yet was subsequently employed as U.G. Munshi at the relevant time , since then he has been working the job of U.G. Munshi yet there is no provision of regularisation as held in the case of Post Master General , Kolkata - versus- Tudoo Das (Dutta) reported in 2007 (4 JCR 101 ( SC) ( B ) on punctilious stady of the authority I find that the Hon'ble Apex Court has been pleased to observe that no appointment should be made contrary to the statutory provision governing recruitment of the rules framed in that behalf under statute of the proviso appended to Article 309 of the Constitution of India ( Para - 12 ) . In view of the nature of the present case as established on behalf ofthe workman , I find that the working of a Timber Mazdoor is quite different from that of a Clerical Job like Underground Munshi , Attendance Clerk etc. prevailing in the Coal Mines Area which is a different cadre from that of the Timber Mazdoor. As such acceding to the contention ofthe Ld . Counsel for the management in consonance with the aforesaid authority, I find that the law does not permit to regularies such worker ( Timber Mazdoor ) as U.G Munshi , which is a Clerical grade, for which the qualification ofMarticulats is pre- requisite . But the workman wouldbe entitled to the wages of a U.G.. Munshi for his accordingly working at the relevant time frequently as engaged by the management . In view of the aforesaid discussed facts and findings, I held that the action of BCCL ( Kustore Area ) for. not regularising Shri Suresh Ram (workman ) as U.G. Munshi isjust. But he is entitled to the differences ofwages ofU.G. 7. Further it is remarkable to note that in view of the admitted facts of MW- 1 Uday Bahadur Kurmi , the P.O.'s Clerk, that the names , of the persons working in the under 3548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Munshi as contrasted with that of the Timber Mazdoor for the period relevant in the years 1994, 2002 , 2003 if earlier notdrawn .

(1) ( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/30/2003 - IR (C- I) dated , the 18thAugust, 2003 .

KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली , 11 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1268.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार , बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 70/2003) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-04-2011 की प्राप्त हुआ था।

" KYA MESSRS BHARAT COKING COALLTD . GOVINDPUR KSHETRA , AKASHKINARI KOYALA KHADAN KEY PRAVANDH - TAN DWARA KARMKAR SHRI NIMAI MOCHI , MINER LOADER KEY MEDICALLY UNFIT HONEY PAR USKI PATNI/ PUTRA KO N.C.W.A. KEY ANTARGAT KASHTIPURTI /SEVAYOJAN LAAV PRADAN NAHI KARNA KANUN EVAM NAYAY KI DRISTI SEY SAHI HAIN ? YADI NAHI TO UKHT KARMKAR ATHAVA USKEY ASHRIT PARIVARGAN KIN LAVON KO PRAPTA KARNEY KEY HAKDAR HAIN ? "

[सं. एल-20012/30/2003- आईआर ( सी-I ) ] डी. एस . एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th April , 2011

S.O. 1268.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 70/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court -2, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute, between the employers in relation to the management ofM/s , BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-04-2011 .

[No1-20012/30/2003 - IR (C- I )]

D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) ( d)) of the I. D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 70 of 2003

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management Govindpur Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen.

APPEARANCES :

2. The case of the sponsoring Union is workman Nimai Mochi , who was permanent employee as Miner/ Loader of Akashkinaree Colliery of Govindpur Area of M/s . BCCL was medically declared unfit by the management as per the Office Order No. 1608/94 dated 22-9-1994 , and his attendance was stopped with immediate effect . His dependent son Durgadas alias Durga Mochi applied for his employment under clause 9.4.0 of NCWA (V) before the management, as his mother was more than 45 years old , but he was quite competent and capable to serve . On the reference of his application as per the management's letter vide No. GM/Ar . III/PD/ 97 / A/46/2844 dated 20/23-5-1997 to the competent authority Koyala Bhawan for approval, the competent authority agreed to consider his case, and requested the Dy. C.P.M.Govindpur Area to obtain the application form with supporting documents from the dependent concerned . As per the instruction of the aforesaid Dy. C.P.M. the dependent/ claimant submitted his aforesaid employment form duly filled up and with all supporting documents in the year 1997, since then neither employment was given to him nor itwas cared by the management, despite he had represented several times . Being aggrieved with the action of the management , his representation filed by the Union before the management could not bring about any settlement , so the industrial dispute was raised before the ALC (C), Dhanbad for the relief of employment and benefits to the dependent family. But the conciliation proceeding failed , thenthe case came under reference for adjudication before theTribunal .

On behalf ofthe workman : Mr. K. N. Singh , Advocate.

State : Jharkhand .

On behalfofthe employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate . Industry: Coal .

Dhanbad , dated the 22nd March , 2011

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10

Further it is pleaded on behalf of the Union that the pendency for the employment of dependent before the management was due to the over age of the claimant (the wife of the ex -employee ) , so she was instructed to make claim for it in favour of her son and just after the receipt of the instruction the claimant had submitted his application for employment , while he was major. Since the dependent son ofex-employee was available and competent to serve the management in place of his father ( ex - employee) no question arises to accept monetary compensation . Thus 3549 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

the petitioner claims for employment on compassionate ground with all the reliefs provided and prevailed in the BCCL .

her monetary benefit with the request for the employment of his aforesaid son (the petitioner ) so it was not possible for giving her monetary benefit as per the Project Officer's letter dated 8-8-2001 ( Ext . W-5) relater to her letter dated 30-7-2001 .

5. In addition to the aforesaid documents on the production of which they were exhibited as mentioned above for the workman , WW- 1 Kamli Devi , wife (widow) ofex-workman Nimai Mochi has produced the Project Officer'sletter No. 2019 dated 18-10-97 (Ext . W- 4 ) which was addressed to her husband . It relates to the fact that his son Durga Charan Das had applied for employment whereas his service record bears his name as Durga Mochi , so he (the workman ) was directed to submit the certificate of the Mukhiya and the B.D.O. that both the names belonged to single man and also to produce the certified photos of both supported with an affidavit so as to proceed for employment. According to aforesaid Kamli Devi (WW- 1 ) inspite of submission of documents , her son(petitioner) did not get employment rather she got a letter from the management that she would not be provided monetary benefit , as her son had aplied for employment as per the management's letter dated 8-8-2001 ( Ext . W- 5 ) . She in her cross - examination has admitted that the petitioner Durga Charan Das is her second son who was less than 15 years of age and she was more than 45 years old so the company had informed her that she would be given Rs . 2000 per month and that at the relevant time none of her sons was more than 15 years , so the name of her son was not enrolled .

3. Whereas the case of the management is that M/s . BCCL is a Government company as well as a State in terms of the Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The appointments in BCCL is a public service; though the appointment are made strictly on open invitation of the application and merits yet some exceptions to it are in favour of the dependents of the employee dying in harness and leaving their families penuary. But after lapse of several years , the present industrial dispute has been raised as a stale one , which is rejectable . The workman Nimai Mochi , theMiner/ Loader was medically declared unfit on 22-9-94 . Hiswife had applied for employment in his place . But on consideration of her proposal , she being over forty- five years old was not entitled for employment . Despite the management's instruction to her to submit a proposal for the employment of his adult son , they have not submitted fany proposal for it at the relevant time. At the information of the management to her to accept the monetary compensation as per the provision of NCWA , she refused to accept it and after a lapse of several years , one Durga Charan Das submitted the application for employment under the said provision . The perusal of his application and the documents revealed that the aforesaid Shri Durga Charan Daswas minor at the relevant time of declaring the workman unfitmedically . There is no provision to provide employment to such a person who was minor at the time of death or medically unfit of an employee , after attaining the majority . The management has already granted monetary compensation to the wife of Nimai Mochi , so no question arises as to providing employment to his dependent son.

4. Finding with reasons

In the instant case , it.is pertinent to mention that the following facts are admitted :--

(i) Workman Nimai Mochi , the Miner /Loader of Akashkinaree Colliery, under GovindpurArea- III was declared medically unfit with immediate effect , and was stopped to make his attendance as per Management's letter dated 22-09-94 ( Ext . W- 1 ).

(ii ) Smt . Kamli Devi was the wife of aforesaid workman was more than 45 years old at that time. Then her son Durga Charan Das (the petitioner ) had applied for employment in place of his father.

6. Whereas the testimony of MW - 1 Nagender Yadav, working as Management Trainee appears to be apparently supportive to the aforesaid admitted facts of the petitioner. In another words , this witness has proved that since the petitioner was minor at the relevant time and Smt. Kamli Devi , the wife of Nimai Mochi was over 45 years old so the claim of employment for the dependent of Nimai Mochi was regretted as per the Management's letter dated 27-2-98 (M - 1 ) . His further statement is that workman Nimai Mochi was medically declared unfit for his disability , for which his wife Kamli Devi was granted monetary benefits/ compensation as perthe Management's letter dated 24 /28-6-96 ( Ext . W- 2), but she did not file any aplication rather she raised the industrial disputed for the employment of her son which isunjustified.

(iii) The petitioner was directed as per management letter dated 13-11-96 (Ext . W- 3 ) in pursuance to the Personnel Manager's letter dated 21 /28-9-96 ( Ext. W-2) for his appearance before the Area Medical Board for his medical examination on 14-11-96 at 10.00 A.M. and

7. Mr. K. N. Singh , the Ld. Advocate-cum- Vice President of the Union concerned has argued that the action of the management in lack of the prof of the assessment of the petitioner age by the Medical Board refusing to provide the petitioner employment on com- passionate ground is unjustified. But in the face of unrebutted facts of minority of the petitioner which amounted to admission, the plea of the aforesaid Ld. ( iv) lastly aforesaid Smt. Kamli Devi , the wife ofex- workman Nimai Mochi had earlier refused to accept 3550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I , DHANBAD Counsel for the workman appears to be not pursuasive and convincing. Whereas Mr. D. K. Verma, Ld . Counsel for the management has contended that the case of the workman as sponsored by the union has no merits in the terms ofNCWA, so the action of the management refusing the petitioner with employment was legallyjustified.

In the matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) )( 2A) of I. D.Act. Reference No. 84 of 1993

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of P. B. Area of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. And Their workmen

Present : SHRI H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For the Employers : Shri B. M. Prasad , Advocate .

For the Workmen : Shri C. Prasad , Advocate .

State: Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal. Dated the 31-3-2011

AWARD

8. In view of the aforesaid discussed facts I find that as per the management's letter dated 23 /27-2- 98 ( Ext.M - 1 ) , the petitioner Durga Charan Das being below 15 years on the date of disablement of his father NimaiMochi was declared not entitled for employment but this letter proves the approval for monetary compensation to Smt . Kamli Devi (widow of the ex- serviceman) with reference to the management's earlier letter No. 16675-77 dt. 28-6-96 (Ext.M -2 ) as final . Under these circumstances the action of the management refusing the employment of the petitioner Durga Charan Das, the son of ex - workman Nimai Mochi and of his wife Smt. Kamli Devi on the ground of their minority and over age respectively was legally justified. But Smt . Kamli Devi , the wife of the workman is entitled to monetary compensation of Rs . 2000 per month w.e.f. 28-6-96 the date of the approval by the competent authority till the age of her sixty years . The management isdirected to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India.

KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer

By Order No. L -20012/ 195/90 - IR ( Coal - I ) dated 24-3-1993 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the I.D.Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of P.B. Area in not allowing Shri B. K. Prasad , Despatch Clerkto resume his duty w.e.f. 1-12-83 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

नई दिल्ली , 11 अप्रैल , 2011 का.आ. 1269.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/1993 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/195/ 1990- आईआर ( सी- I ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 11th April , 2011

S.O. 1269.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 84/1993 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court - 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-04-2011 .

[No. L- 20012/ 195 / 1990-IR (C- I ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

2. The case of the concerned workman is that he wasworking as a Despatch Clerk in J.O.C.P. under erstwhile management before nationalisation and continued working as such even after Nationalisation ofCoal Mines . Sometime in 1981 the concerned workman was transferred to P.B. Area . He was not provided with any accommodation atthe place of his transfer and was allowed to retain the quarter allotted to him at J.O.C.P. as a result he was attending hisduty from his quarter at J.O.C.P. On 23-3-1983 while the concerned workman was going to attend his duty by a Tempo, the said Tempo net with an accident as a result of which he was injured and got severe pain in his chest . So he had to undergo treatment for a long time. He sent an application by post to the management for grant of sick leave . On 1-12-1983 he was declared fit and after getting fit certificate from the physician he went to P.B. Area to resume his duty, but he was not allowed to resume his duty. The management handed over to him a charge- sheet dated 28-10-83/2-11-83 with some false and malicious charges. The concerned workman replied to the charge- sheet and requested to allow him to resume his duty. But the management instead of allowing him to resume his duty 3551

भारत का राजपत्र : मई7 , 2011 /वैशाख17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

guilty of serious misconduct and accordingly, he issued letter of dismissal dated 19-2-1992 to the concerned workman.

It has been prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass the award holding that the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement .

gave a letter dated 1-12-83 directing to appear before the Chief Medical Officer for getting his medical papers examined and checked . He appeared before the C.M.O. who by a letter asked him to visit on 4-1-84 . He visited the C.M.O. but nothing was done and he was illegally kept hanging on and was prevented from resuming his duty. Thereafter an industrial dispute was raised before A.L.C. (C) but without any effect . Hence , the dispute has been referred to this Tribunal for adjudication . It has been stated that neither the concerned workman has been suspended nor dismissed/discharged, but has been illegally stopped from hiswork.

5. In this case the enquiry was held to be fair and proper vide order dated 10-9-1999.

It has been prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award in favour of the concerned workman with full back wages .

6. In this case the concerned workman died on 10-9-2001 during the pendency of this case and his eldest son , Santoshji Prasad , has been substituted in the instant case in place of the deceased workman vide order dated 22-7-2003 and in that regard other heirs of the deceased workman have got no objection .

7. The management has produced documents which have been marked Exts . M - 1 to M -6.

8. Main argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman is that he met an accident so he was. absent from duty. He informed the management about his absent and requested to grant him sick leave but the management ignored to grant leave . After recovery on 1-12-1983 he reported for duty but he was not allowed to join . The management issued charge- sheet dated 5-5-89 to the concernedworkman , so much late which cause has not been shown why and due to what cause the management constituted enquiry affer lapse of 5 years of absence of the concerned workman . Ext.M -4 series shows that in the enquiry proceeding it has been mentioned at page 15 that the concerned workman produced medical certificate (Ext.D-3 ) and he appeared before the management after fitness for joining duty on 1-12-83 , but he was not allowed to join though he made number of representations to the management . Final order was passed by the management as per Ext.M- 6 which shows that no second show-cause notice was given to the workman.

The learned counsel of the concerned workman referred Current Labour Report (SC) 1991 page 61 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that supply of a copy of the inquiry report along with recommendations , if any , in the matter of proposed punishment to be inflicted would be within the rules of natural justice . Second show- cause notice was necessary which has not been done by the management ignoring the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court .

The enquiry report , Ext . M. 5 , also shows at page 4 that the concerned workman had gone for treatment when he met with an accident on 23-3-83 and became unconcious . Ithas been admitted that he had sent application (Ext.D- 2) on 25-3-83 regarding his absence due to accident.

3. The case of the management is that the concerned workman started absenting from his duties w.e.f. April, 1963 without permission or authorised leave and without any satisfactory cause. He was issued with a charge- sheet dated 5-5-89 under Clause 17 ( 1 ) (n) of the Model Standing Orders . He was charged for commission of misconduct of " continuous absence " without permission and without satisfactory cause for more than 10 days . He was asked to show cause in writing within 7days of the receipt of the charge-sheet . But he did not submit any reply. The management appointed Shri H.R. Choudhuri , Personnel Manager of P.B. Area as Enquiry Officer, who issued notice of enquiry dated 3 /4-10-91 to him fixing the date ofenquiry on 9-10-91 . In the departmental. enquirythe concerned workman was given full opportunity. The concernedworkman or his co-worker did not raise any objection against the procedure of enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer. It has been submitted that the departmental enquiry was held fairly and properly in accordance with the principles of natural justice and he was given full opportunity to defend his case . The Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 30-12-91 and held the concerned workman guilty of the charges levelled against him. The concerned workman took the defence in his reply to the charge- sheet that he met an accident on 23-3-83 when he was going to his duty in a tempo and he submitted an application dated 23-3-83 to the management informing that he was undergoing treatment through a private doctor and he was unable to attend to his duties . The concerned workman was absenting from his duties from April , 1983 has been admitted by him , rather he said that he was not attending to his duties from 23-3-1983 on account of the alleged injury received by him in the course of an accident. Theconcerned workman produced several documents and letters in support of his claim that he met an accident and was incapable of movement and remained absent from his duties because of the injury received by him due to the- accident . The General Manager ofthe Area perused all the relevant papers , considered the gravity ofthe misconduct and was fully satisfied that the concerned workman was $552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

संख्या 63/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The learned counsel of the concerned workman also referred 1994 Supreme Court Cases ( L & S ) 521 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that on death of workman during pendency of proceeding before Labour Court/ Tribunal would not result in abatment of the proceeding .

[सं. एल-11012/31/2009- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] डी. एस . एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th April , 2011

S.O. 1270.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 63/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court -2, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Sahara Airlines Ltd. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011 .

9. The learned counsel of the management referred 2009 ( 123 ) FLR 99 ( Kerala High Court) in which Hon'ble Kerala High Court laid down-" Unauthorised absence from service-Termination of service-Award of Labour Court concurring with Explanation given by the employee degarding his absence has a vital role in deciding the issue- Conclusion of Management that worker has no intention to join duty-Tribunal ought to have appreciated the evidence and materials on record in its correct perspective- Failure to do so Approach of Tribunal is illegal and arbitrary" .

[No. L- 11012/31 /2009 -IR(C-I) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Monday, the 28th February, 2011 PRESENT : A.N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 63/2009 10. Considering the above facts and circumstances it shows that the concerned workman was absent from dutyfromApril , 83 , but chargesheet was issued on 5-5-89 which shows after about 5 years , which shows prejudicial act of the management against the concerned workman . Moreover, no show - cause notice was issued before termination of service , so the action of the management in not allowing the concerned workman to resume his duty w.e.f. 1-12-83 is not justified and the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages from 1-12-83 and other consequential benefits . As the concerned workman died on 10-9-2001 during the pendency of the case , his son , Santoshjee Prasad , who has been substituted in the instant case in place of his father , is entitled to get full back wages from 1-12-83 with other consequential benefits .

[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of M/ s . Sahara Airlines Ltd. and their Workman] .

11. Accordingly, I render the following award-

BETWEEN

.... I Party Petitioner

Sri P.V. Dayalu: Vs.

1. M/ s . Sahara Airlines Limited L-70/ 329 , Mahipalpur Extension , New Delhi -110037 ,

....2nd Respondent/ 1st Party The action of the management of P. B. Area in not allowing Shri B. K. Prasad , Despatch Clerk to resume his duty w.e.f. 1-12-83 is not justified . Hence , the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages from 1-12-83 and other consequential benefits . Since the concerned workman died during the pendency of the case , his son, Santoshjee Prasad , who has been substituted in this case, is entitled to get full back wages from 1-12-83 and other consequential benefits till the date of superannuation ofhisfather. The management is directed to implement the award within 30 days from the date of publication of the award.

2.M/s . Sahara India Commercial Corpn . Ltd. Sahara India Centre , 8th floor No.2, Kapoorthala Complex Aliganj Lucknow - 226024

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 11 अप्रैल , 2011

2nd Respondent/2nd Party

3.M/s. Jet Airways Ltd. , SM Centre , Andheri - Kurla Road Andheri East Mumbai-400059

का. आ. 1270.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सहारा एयरलाईनस लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ

....2nd Responden/3rd Party 3553 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

APPEARANCES :

4. Points for consideration are:

Forthe Petitioner: Sri K. Sudalai Kannu , L. Kalaieswaran

For the 2nd Respondent/ 1st Party: M/s . Gupta & Ravi

( i) Whether the demand for the absorption of the petitioner in Jet Lite by Jet Airways ( India) isjustified and legal?

For the 2nd Respondent/2nd : M/s V. Devraj , Auth . Party

Representative

(ii) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?

ForThe 2nd Responden/3rd Party : M/s . Gupta & Ravi .

Points No.1 & 2

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/31 /2009 - IR( CM - 1) dated 19 -.06-2009 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

4. When the ID stood posted today ' for further proceeding the petitioner appeared in person and filed a petition supported by Affidavit, both signed by him praying for withdrawing the dispute . It is averred that the dispute has been settled with the Management and that he already submitted his resignation alongwith PF Withdrawal Forms and that after collecting full and final payment of dues he forgoes his right of reinstatement . In view of the above embodied terms of the settlement the ID is sought to be withdrawn and an award is to be passed .

"Whether the demand of Sri P.V. Dayalu for his absorption in Jet Lite by the Management of Jet Airways with reference to the Share Purchase Agreement of dated 1-4-07 entered by the Management of Jet Airways (India) Ltd. , Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. and . others and Sahara Airlines Ltd. isjustified and legal ? ( ii) to what relief is the workman concerned entitled ? "

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 63/2009 and issued notices to both , sides . Both sides entered appearance , petitioner in person, 1st and 3rd Respondents through Advocates and 2nd Respondent through Authorized Representative. Thepetitioner filed Claim Statement . No Counter Statement has been filed by any of the Respondents .

5. On a consideration of the request of the petitioner supported by the written application and affidavit sworn to in support thereof , approved by the Respondeht by endorsing no objection, that the dispute has been settled between the parties in consideration of the full and final payment of dues thereof to be made by him and on foregoing the right of reinstatement , he be permitted to withdraw the dispute in the wake of the repeated appeal of thisTribunal before the parties to have the dispute amicably settled and the petitioner having effected out of court settlement of the dispute in terms thereof as was originally claimed the prayer is only to be accorded.

3. Short recitals of facts in the Claim Statement are asfollows:

6. Accordingly the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the dispute. In view ofthe fact that the withdrawal isin lieu of agreed monetary compensation to be fulfilled thereof and his claim for absorption being given up no question further survives as to the demand for the absorption as being whether legal and justified .

7. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the PA, transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 28th February, 2011 )

A.N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :-

Forthe I Party/Petitioner : None

For the II Party/ Petitioner : None

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner's side:

Ex. No. Date

Description

Nil

On theManagement's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Nil

The petitioner appointed as Security Assistant on 1-9-1996 with last drawn salary of Rs . 10,700 later promoted asSecurity Officer on 11-6-2005 by the First Respondent later by a Bipartite Agreement dated 18-01-2006 amended on 1-4-2007between Jet Airways (India) Ltd. , Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. and ( iii ) Sahara Airlines Ltd. continued employment of Pilots , Engineers , etc. keeping out petitioner for no reason . On 1-9-2007 Sahara Airlines purported to transfer petitioner to Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. ( SICC) who in turn deputed him to Jet Airways . On 1-6-2007 he was transferred to Rajnandgaon , Chhatisgarh , though objected wherein he Joined but due to personal problems he came back and the ID is raised . The petitioner is entitled to be absorbed in Jet Airways without being discriminated under Share Purchase Agreement dated 18-1-2006 . Permission under Section- 25(N) ofthe ID Act had not been obtained . Petitioner would at least be entitled to 3 months ' salary in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation . He was never employed by SICC created to defeat his rights and his deputation is a camouflage . Termination could amount to retrenchment . Demand for his absorption in Jet Lite with all benefits is prayed for.

1410GI /11-10 3554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 11 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1271.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन एयरलाईन्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को. 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11012/160/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी.एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th April , 2011

S.O. 1271.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 12/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Indian Airlines Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011 .

[No. L- 11012/ 160/2000 - IR (C- I) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

REFERENCE No. 12 of2001

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Indian Airlines

AND Their workmen

PRESENT : Mr. JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR, Presiding officer

APPEARANCE :

On behalf of the : Mr. R. N. Majumder , Advocate with Management Mr. S. Roy , Advocate

On behalf of the : Mr. Tulu Oraon, wife of deceased Workmen workman in person

State: West Bengal

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] of its powers under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Airlines Ltd. in dismissing Shri Shankar Oraon from service ofthe organization w.e.f. 28-9-99 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? י

2.On call today, Mr. R. N. Majumder , Ld . Advocate with Mr. S. Roy, Ld . Advocate is present for the management . The present substituted claimant, Smt . Tulu Oraon is present in person and she has submitted that her husband during his life time received the Provident Fund amount of Rs . 1,33,000 . After the death of her husband , she has received the outstanding amount of Rs.84,133.84 paise as full satisfaction of the claim due to her hasband late Sankar Oraon , She has further stated that at present she has no other claim outstanding from the management and accordingly the dispute in the present reference has been settled/satisfied by those payments.

3.At present, according to the substituted claimant , no dispute is subsisting. So the present dispute may be treated as not existing and thus disposed of accordingly in the context as stated above .

4.However, in view of the end of the matter as stated above , and Award is passed.

Dated , Kolkata , 14thMarch, 2011

JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1272.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी. सी.. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद नं. 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 61/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/277/1999- आईआर ( सी- I ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th April , 2011

Industry: Airlines

Dated : 14th March , 2011

AWARD

By Order No. L - 11012/ 160/2000- IR( C- I ) dated 2-3- 2001 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise S.O. 1272.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 61/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court- No.1 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BBCL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011 .

[No. L -20012/277/ 1999 - IR (C- I ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD In the matter of a reference U /s . 10 (1 )(d ) (2A) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO . 61 of2000

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area ofM/s . Bharat Coking Coal Limited. AND Their workmen

PRESENT: Shri H.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES :

For the Employers : None

Forthe Workman : None

Industry: Coal State: Jharkhand

Dated, 24th March, 2011

AWARD

By Order No. L -20012/ 277 /99 - IR (C- I ) dated 21-1-2000, the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Kusunda Area of M /s . BCCL in not regularizing Sri Lallan Singh as underground Munshi as he is reportedly working as such since 5-4-82 is justified ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? "

2. This order of reference was received in this Tribunal on 1-2-2000 . Thereafter notices were sent to the parties for filing written statement by the workman . But inspite of giving several adjournments neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union appeared before this Tribunal to take any step . Management also has not filed its written statement . It therefore , appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case.

Under such circumstances I render a ' no dispute ' award in the present Industrial Dispute.

H.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 11 अप्रैल , 2011

का.आ. 1273.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -2, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 125/2001 )

3555

को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/459/1997- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th April , 2011

S.O. 1273. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 125/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunai- cum- Labour Court , No. 2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011 .

[No. L-20012/459/ 1997 - IR(C-I) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 AT DHANBAD PRESENT: SHRI KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer In the matter ofan Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act . , 1947

REFERENCE No. 125 of2001

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C. L. and their workmen .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workman Mr. T. P. Jha, Advocate Onbehalf of the Employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate State: Jharkhand Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 28th March , 2011

AWARD

The Government of India Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) (d) of the 1. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following disputes to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/459/ 97 - IR( C - I ) , dated , the 26th March, 2001 .

SCHEDULE

Kya Bahujan Mazdoor Union ki mang ki Sri Jamuna Mishra Mining Sirdar Nawadih Kusunda Colliery ki janma tarikh 1-1-49 manijaye uchit evam nayasangat hain ? Yadi han to karmkar kis rahat key patra hain ? "

2. The case of the sponsoring union is that workman Jamuna Mishra was initially appointed on 4-1-1971 at East Bastacolla Colliery of M/ s . Banwari Lal Agarwal , the 3556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

4.Whereas , with specific denials to the allegations as alleged on behalf of the workman/sponsoring Union , the case of the management is that the workman was appointed in the year 1971 and on his declaration at the relevant time, all the particular concerning him were filled up inthe Form B Register including his age 35 years as on 1972under his signature as token to the acceptance of the particulars mentioned therein , of which , the management also informed him in the year 1987. He accepted the same, and did not raise any dispute concerning his age entry into the aforesaid Form B Register and other statutory records . But suddenly in the year 1986 the sponsoring Union raised the issue and demanded for the correction of his age recorded in the aforesaid register on the basis of some educational certificate after lapse of 25 years of his appointment. Both the aforesaid Certificates ofGas testing and Mining Sirdar were obtained in 1976 as contrasted with his appointment in the year 1971. The Director General of Mines Safety in not an authority to certify the date of birth of any person and the Certificate is issued by the Director General of Mines Safety on the basis of the application ofthe workman himself so the certificate is not authentic . The colliery Manager only given the working Certificate on the Form but the workman has not given any reason why he declared his age as 32 years as on 1972 at the time of his appointment . So there is no merit in the claim ofthe concerned workman .

FINDING WITH REASONS

5. In the instant case , WW- I Jamuna Mishra, the then workman on behalf of himself and MW- 1 Sanjay Kumar Ghosh , Personnel Manager of Kusunda Area on behalf of the management have been examined in order to substantiate their respective cases .

Onthe scrutiny of the evidence of both the parties , I find that the then workman has admitted to have put his LTI when his particulars including his age were recorded. Buthis voluntary statement that being an illiterate he could not saywhat was written in English in the Form B Register cannot be acceptable in the face of his Service Excerpt (W-4)which iswritten in Hindi all his particulars under his signature which bears 32 years as on 1972 ( as per Form B Register) written in English .

erstwhile colliery owner prior to the take over of the Mines by the Central Government along with the other Mines . After taking ever of the aforesaid Nines , it was transferred to Dhansar Colliery of the same Kusunda Area, then Nayadih Kusunda Colliery of the same area of BCCL , where he was permanenet employee working as Mining Sirdar having his I.D. Card No. 00676817 and C.M.P.F. No. 389884. He had passed Gas Testing Certificate as wll as Sirdar Certificate bearing No. 35090 conducted by the Board of mining Examination , D.G.M.S. , Dhanbad on 16-7-1976 and 13-12-1976 respectively, and accordingly both the statutory certificates were issued to him on 24-12-1976 and 23-2-1977 respectively wherein his date ofbirth as 1-1-1949 was recorded . He passed both the Certificate during his employment on his application for it which were forwarded by the Manager of Dhansar Colliery. He deposited his aforesaid original statutory certificate to Kusunda Colliery on12-4-1977 as per its recepit enclosed. On the issuance of HisService Excerpt in the year 1987 along with the otheremployees , he found therein his date of birth/age was shown as 32 years as on 1972 as per Form B Register , then he specifically disputed that as per the statutory certificates and school leaving certificate his date of birth was 1st January, 1949 and the same should be corrected and a copy of Service Excerpt was also received by the management concerned on 8-7-1987 but no action on its part was taken for 13 years nor it was cared for its reply despite the representations sponsored by both representative of the Indian National Mines Overman Sirdar and Short Firer Association as well as the concerned workman on 8th Dec , 1986 , 24th August and 2st Oct 1993, 21st June, 1995, 3rd Oct. 1996 and 25th Sept, 1997 continuously to the management for the correction of his date of birth as per his statutory certificates as also in accordance of JBCCI Instruction No. 76. In this case there is no dispute of birth -date since the employee already passed the Statutory Certificates 11 years prior to his services excerpt having been issued by the management . Yet the management illegally, arbitrarily and forcibly superannuated him , though the workman had already submitted a photo copy of his transfer school certificate bearing his date ofbirth as 1-1-1949 . Moreover, his date of birth was wrongly recorded without any basis . He was never asked for any Medical Examination for his age assessment . As such the action of the management was malafide to forcibly put him under retirement against the public sector company's policy.

Secondly admitted fact is that after getting his employment on 4-1-1971 under the management , he was posted as Timber Mazdoor at East Bastacolla Colliery from where he was transferred to Dhansar Colliery accordingly and in the year 1987 he was posted as Mining Sirdar at Nayadih Kusunda Colliery and that he passed and get the GasTesting Certificate and Mining Sirdar Certificate in the year 1976 and 1977 respectively which are marked as Exts . W- 1 and W- 2 resprectively.

3. In rejoinder further case of the workman is that he had been continuously requesting for entry of his date of birth/ ageas per his Mining Sirdar Certificate passed in the year 1976 much before the issue of Service Excerpt but the management deliberatly failed to record his date of birth accordingly. Thus the demand of the Union is alleged to be legal and justified.

6. As per the statement of WW- 1 Jamuna Mishra, the then worker, his application for bearing his date of 3557 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

birth as 1-1-49 was forwarded by the management to the D.G.M.S. without any objection and he had deposited his -aforesaid Certificate to the management as per the receipt (Ext. W-- 3 ) . By his letter (dated 20-2-94- Ext .W- 5) as the forwarding letter by the Project Officer to the Area Personnel Manager, Kusunda Area , the then workman has claimed to have raised the dispute over his age having been recorded 32 years as on 1972 for its rectification as 1-1-1949 as recorded in aforesaid both certificates but the management did not rectify his aforesaid date of birth nor sent him to the Medical Board for the assessment of his age, rather the management superannuated him from the service from January, 2000 , as contrasted with his superannuated due in the year 2009. His aforesaid forwarding letter ( Ext . W-5 ) stands as a proof that he had raised his age dispute on 8-7-87. This workman though claims to have submitted his School Leaving Certificate to the management at the time of appointment and his School Leaving Certificate recorded his date of birth as 1-1-49 yet hasnot produced or proved it in the Case.

cross - examination the witness has affirmed the preparation oftheForm B Register in 1972 and his working as Personnel Manager in BCCL since 2007 that both the aforesaid Certificates are statutory certificates under the Mines Act yet they are in admissible under the aforesaid Implementation Instruction No. 76 , rather their admissibility pre- supposes the possession of those certificate prior to the date of the workman's ( employment) . On the scrutiny of Ext . W-3 , the receipt of three documents namely, First AidCertificate and the aforesaid Certificates of Mining Sirdar and Gas Testing which is dated 12-4-77 appears to be contradictory to the fact of the workman about raising hisdispute concerning age earlier on 8-7-87 as per the aforesaid Project Officer's letter dated 20-2-1994 ( Ext . W- 5) . Moreover , the aforesaid receipt ( Ext . W- 3 ) does not prove the filing of his School Leaving Certificate bearing 1-1-1949 as his date of birth at the relevant time on behalf of the workman . I find that the workman has though pleaded to have filed his School leaving Certificate yet failed to prove it as a substantive piece of evidence for his claim of his aforesaid date of birth as also recorded in aforesaid both certificates in the instant case .

7. It is remarkable to note that the Service Excerpt (Ext. W-4) of the workman bears " Thirty two -32 years as on 1972 as per Form B " which palpably appears to have been cut in the same pen his date of birth in Hindi digits 1-1-1949 under his signature in Hindi " Jamuna Mishra" written against the serial 6 (2) of the said Service Excerpt and since the aforesaid cutting is without the initial of any authority so tampering with the Service Excerpt by none but by the workman himself in order to strongthen his case .

8. Whereas affirmly proving the Zerox copy of the Form B Register of all employees including the concerned workman continuously maintained under Vol . III bearing the name of the workman Jamuna Mishra at Sl . No. 1701 as Ext.M - 1 and M - 1 / 1 respectively, MW - 1 Sanjay Kumar Ghosh, the Personnel Manager of Kusunda Area has stated that the aforesaid Form B Register maintained under the provisions of Mines Act has the entry in detail of the name, parentage , address , his age 32 years on January, 1972 and the date of commencement of his employment 4th Jan, 1971 under the signature of the employed concerned . According to this Management's witness any document produced by the workman for his claim concerning his date of birth relates to prior the date of his employment is admissible under Implementation Instruction No.76 of J.B.C.C.I but both the certificates (Ext. W- 1 and W-2 ) , Gas testing Certificate and Mining Sirdar Certificate dated 24-12-1976 and 23-2-1977 respectively ) are beyond the date of his aforesaid employment . The witness has also pointed out the cutting over the words 32 years as on 1972 as per Form B Register apparent from the Service Excerpt (Ext . W-4) of the workman which was without initial . Maintaining the veracity in his

9. Mr. T. P. Jha, the Ld . Advocate for the Union/ workman has submitted that both the aforesaid certificates of Gas Testing and Mining Sirdar being statutory ones which bear Ist January, 1949 as birth date of workman are admissible under the Implementation Instruction No.76 (B) . Atthis very point Mr. D. K. Verma, the Ld . Counsel for the management relying upon the authority 2007 ( 3 ) JLJR 470 (SB), Hemlal Turi - Versus -Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. as held therein has contended that as to the correction of date of birth under the Labour & Industrial Laws , reliance was made on Sirdar's Certificate and School Transfer Certificate issued after about 6-9 years of the appointment of the workman, so these certificates having been issued much after appointment cannot be considered to be conclusive proof of date of birth , when the case has been fully condisdered by the date of birth committee which found the date of birth as entered in the statutory Form B Register as correct on the basis of Service record , raising dispute about the date of birth by the employee at the fag end of his service is not permissible ( para- 6 ) ( the aforesaid authority relied upon ( 1994) 6 SCC 302 ; ( 2001 ) 4 SSC 52). In the instant case which is similar to the factum of the aforesaid authority, I find the contention of Mr. T. P. Jha, the Ld . Advocate for the Union/ workman cuts notice with me and it seems not convicing in the spirit of the statutory laws , rather the plea of Mr. D. K. Verma , Ld . Advocate for the management appears to be quite reasonable and pursuasive . So far as the treatment of Gas Testing Certificates and Mining Sirdar Certificate of the workman certifying his aforesaid date of birth as authentic is concerned it is applicable subject to its proviso to the Implementation Instruction No.76 ( B) ( i ) ( a) but his both the certificates in lack of the proof of his School leaving 3558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

Certificate as pleaded cannot be conclusive proof in the eye oflaw.

10. In view of the aforesaid discussed facts and circumstances, I find that the workman himself has miserably failed to prove his claim for the correction of his birth date asentered in his Service Excerpt according to which he has retired earlier . Thus the demand of the Union concerned for regarding the date 1-1-49 as the birth date of Jamuna Mishra , Mining Sirdar Nayadih Kusunda Colliery is not justified and legal . Consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 अप्रैल, 2011

का.आ. 1274.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अम्बंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 71/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/302/2002- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th April, 2011

S.O. 1274.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 71/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 2, Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011.

[No. L-20012/302/2002- IR(C- I ) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 AT DHANBAD PRESENT : Shri Kishori Ram , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) ofthe I.D. Act . , 1947

Reference No. 71 of 2003

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Bharat Coking Cdal Ltd. and their workmen .

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workman : None

Onbehalf of the Employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal Dated , Dhanbad , the 31st March , 2011

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) ( d ) of the I. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/ 302/ 2002 - IR (C - I ) , dated , the 18th August , 2003 .

SCHEDULE

Whether the action of the management of M/ s . BCCL in refusing the supply of LPG gas cylinder or reimbursement of Cost of LPG gas cylinder to 57 workmen (as per list ) is justified ? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled ? "

2. None appeared on behalf of the Union CIL , ITI Employees Association Bharat Coking Coal , whereas Mr. D. K. Verma , the Ld . Advocate for the management is present. The case has been running for the evidence of workman since 9-3-2006 . But despite registered notices dated 11-1-2003 and 22-10-2010 , the sponsoring Union did not appear with any workman witness for evidence on its part even to day in the case which relates to the refusal of the management to supply the LPG Gas Cylinder to 57 workmen as per list to the Schedule.

3. I find that this is the oldest case and despite the registered notices to the Union concerned , neither the Union concerned nor any workman witness for evidence appeared before the Tribunal . It seems that the Union is no longer interested in producing the witness on behalf ofthe workman for their case . Under these circumstances , carrying on the case for this purpose would be useless , Hence the case is closed, and accordingly the order is passed.

KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer ListofWorkmen :

1. श्री राजेन्द्र प्रसाद

2. श्री पी. के. सिंह

3. श्री अवधेश कुमार

4. श्री रविन्द्र कु. सिंह

5. श्री अंजनी कुमार

6. श्री महादेव प्रसाद 3559

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

39. श्री भगवान सिंह

7. श्री राजकुमार प्रसाद

40. श्री भूपेन्द्र प्रसाद शर्मा

8. श्री गणेश प्रसाद ठाकुर

41. श्री अमलकान्त राय

9. श्री एम. डी. करीम अख्तर

42. श्री मुन्ना बैठा

10. श्री वृजनन्दन साव

43. श्री रामेश्वर रजवार

11. श्री उमेश कुमार सिंह

44. श्री एस. एन. मिंज

12. श्री प्रदीप झा

45. श्री नरेश पासवान

13. श्री दिवाकर प्रसाद सिंह

46. श्री भरत भूषण सिंह

14. श्री शिवानन्द तिवारी

47. श्री शैलेन्द्र कुमार सिंह

15. श्री सुबोध कुमार मण्डल

48. श्री सुभाष समद

16. श्री रामाशीष यादव

49. श्री विरेन्द्र प्रसाद

17. श्री जयमूल अर्बुदीन अंसारी

50. श्री जवाहर राम

18. श्री राज कुमार सिन्हा

51. श्री जय गोविन्द प्रसाद

19. श्री अरविन्द कुमार वर्णमाल

52. श्री रामजी प्रसाद

20. श्री अमिक महतो

53. श्री लक्ष्मण बैठा

21. श्री विरेन्द्र कुमार सिंह

54. श्री रतन लाल

22. श्री करमा भगत

55. श्री राममोहन राम

23. श्री श्रवण कुमार

56. श्री रामाश्रय प्रसाद

24. श्री सुधीर कुमार वर्मा

57. श्री सुबोध ठाकुर

25. श्री अशोक कुमार पंडित

नई दिल्ली, 11 अप्रैल, 2011

26. श्री रमण कुमार

27. श्री सुरेश प्रसाद

28. श्री रामेश्वर प्रसाद सिंह

29. श्री दिनेश प्रसाद सिंह

30. श्री सुरेश साव

का.आ. 1275.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई. सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद नं.। के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 222/1990 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

31. श्री अमरेन्द्र कुमार

32. श्री सुनिल कुमार श्रीवास्तव

[सं. एल-20012/09/1990- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी. एस. एस . श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी 33. श्री रामलखन शर्मा

New Delhi , the 11th April , 2011

34. श्री उमेश मण्डल

35. श्री अनिल कुमार सिंह

36. श्री बी. के. सिंह

37. श्री आर. पी . सिंह

38. श्री सिकन्दर सिंह

S.O. 1275.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 222/ 1990 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . E. C..Ltd . , and their workmen , 3560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] which was received by the Central Government on 11-4-2011.

[No. L-20012/09/ 1990- IR (C- I) ]

D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

the same ended in failure due to adamant attitude of the management . The Government of India , Ministry of Labour has referred the dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal . It has been stated that the demand of Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union for promotion of G. Mukherjee as Special Grade Clerk w.e.f. 13-8-1988 is legal andjustified.

ANNEXURE

It has been prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award in favour of the workman.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD

Inthematter ofa reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) ( 2A) of I.D. Act .

Reference NO . 222 of 1990

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Lakhimata Colliery ofM/ s . E.C. Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen

PRESENT : Shri H.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For theEmployers : Shri B. M. Prasad, Advocate .

None

Forthe Workman :

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

3. The case of the management is that Shri G. Mukherjee along with some other Clerks Grade- I were promoted to the post of Special Grade Clerk by Office Order dated 13-8-88 as per recommendations of D.P.C. Afew months after the aforesaid promotion , it was reported to the management that G. Mukherjee and some others who were selected by D.P.C. and who secured promotions to the post of Special Grade Clerk did not have the requisite educational qualification . The matter was then investigated and G. Mukherjee , concerned workman and others were called upon to produce proof/ documents regarding their educational qualification , which they failed to produce . During the course of investigation it was found that the concerned workman made a false declaration regarding his educational qualification . In consequence , the concerned workman was reverted to the postof Clerk Grade - I vide Office Order dated 20/21-1-89: Similar action was taken in the case of others also .

Dated , the 28th March , 2011

AWARD

In such circumstances it has been prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award by rejecting the demand of the union .

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement .

By Order No. L - 20012/9 /90 - IR ( C- I ) dated 20-9-90 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

5. The concerned workman has not produced witness though notice was issued to him.

The management has produced MW- 1 , Ganesh Prasad Singh .

"Whether the demand of Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union (CITU) for promotion of Shri G. Mukherjee as SpecialGr . Clerk w.e.f 11-8-88 is justified? If not, to whatrelief the workman entitled to ? "

6.Main demand of the concerned workman is that he be promoted as Special Grade Clerk . But the management has stated that Special Grade Clerk's promotion is made from Clerk Grade - I . The concerned workman does not possess such qualification for Special Grade . He has given bio-data which does not show that he has got qualification forSpecialGrade .

7. Considering the above facts and circumstances , it shows that the demand of Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union (CITU) for promotion of Shri G. Mukherjee as special Grade Clerk w.e.f. 13-8-88 is not justified and hence the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

Thisismy award .

2. The case of the concerned workman is that he has been working as permanent clerk of Lakhimata Colliery since long with unblemished record of service . As per seniority in Grade- I Clerk the concerned workman was promoted to the post of Special Grade Clerk through D.P.C. by an Office Order dated 13-8-1988 , and he started working as Special Grade Clerk sincerely to the satisfaction of the management. All on a sudden an unauthorised person issued an illegal and arbitrary order cancelling the promotion of the concerned workman and demoted him to the post of Grade - I Clerk by Office Order dated 20/21-1-89. He protested against the illegal and arbitrary cancellation order but without any effect . Thereafter an industrial dispute was raised before ALC(C ) , Dhanbad , but

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer 3561

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 अप्रैल , 2011

AWARD

Passed on 10 March, 2011

Central Government vide Notification No. L-40012/ 6/2004-1R(DU) Dated 2-06-2004, by exercising its powers under Section 10 sub section ( 1 ) Clause ( d) and sub section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as Act) has referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

का. आ. 1276. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं.609/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-40012/6/2004- आई आर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13thApril , 2011

"Whether the action of the management of the Post Master, Head Post Office, Civil Lines Area, Bathinda in terminating the service of Smt . Gurdev Kaur W/o Late Sh. Ajmer Singh w.e.f. 15-10-2002, without any notice and without any payment of retrenchment is illegal and unjustified? If so to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?"

S. O. 1276. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 609/ 2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, No. II Chandigarh as shown in theAnnexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Post and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-4-2011 .

[No. L-40012/6/2004- IR(DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

The case of the claimant is that she was appointed as Water - woman in 1993 at Head Post Office , Civil Lines Area, Bathinda . The work of the waterman is of permanent nature . But her services were terminated w.e.f. 15-10-2002 in violation of the provisions of the Act . She was not given any notice nor she was paid notice pay or retrenchment compensation and after her termination new persons were appointed. She has claimed her reinstatement with continuity of services and back wages .

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , CHANDIGARH

PRESENT : Sri A.K. RASTOGI, PresidingOfficer.

Case No. 1. D. 609/2K5

Registered on 24-8-2005

Smt . Gurdev Kaur

W/o late Sh . Ajmer Singh R/ o Village Bangi Ruldu, Tehsil Talwandi Sabo ,

Bhatinda (Punjab) .

Claimwas contested by the management and it was stated that as per official record no appointment letter was ever issued to the claimant and no wages or salary has ever been drawn against her name . The salary for contingency paid part time workers like water carrier is never drawn against the name of the worker but is drawn from contingency against water carrier by designation . In the absence of any documents on record the contention of the claimant about her employment as water woman cannot be admitted . Her contention about the termination of her services with effect from 15-10-2002 was also denied. The services ofcontingency paid part time worker can validly be terminated as and when there is no further requirement of his /her engagement .

...Applicant

Versus

1. The Chief Post Master General , Department of Posts , Punjab Circle , Sector 17, Chandigarh .

Claimant filed a rejoinder to say that she continuously worked from the date of her appointment in 1993 till the date ofher termination on 15-10-2002 . She was paid salary against the receipts .

2. The Post Master, Head Post Office , Deptt. of Posts, Civil LinesArea, Bhatinda (Punjab) .

From the pleadings of the parties following issues arise for consideration :-

3. The Supdt . of Post Offices, Deptt. Of Posts , Bhatinda Division, Bhatinda .

APPEARANCES :

...Respondents

1. Whether the claimant was in the employment of the respondent/management, if so , whether her services weretermination in violation of Section 25F of the Act? Forthe Workman

: Sh . H. S. Hundal, AR for workman

2. Whether after termination of the services of the claimant new hands were employed in violation of Section 25H of the Act?

Sh . K. K. Thakur, Adv .

For the Management :

141045711-11 3562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7, 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 3. To what relief is the claimant entitled?

In support of her claim the claimant tendered her affidavit and examined Purshottam Dass , Assistant Post Master, Bathinda about the record summoned by her from the management . The management on the other hand tendered the affidavit of Shri R. K. Sharma , Superintendent ofPost Offices , Bathinda. I have considered , the material available on record and also the arguments of the counsels . My findings on the various issues are as under:-

Issue No. 1 .

Claimant's case is that she was in the employment of the management on the post of Water Woman from 1993 till the termination of her services on 15-10-2002.

toboth the records . It may be noted that the rules provide the period after which the records may be destroyed. It does not make it mandatory for the department to destroy the record after the given period. The record may be retained for a longer period in case of necessity. It will be seenhere that the claimant has claimed her employment in thedepartment from 1993 to 15-10-2002 . She has raised an industrial dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner, Central and thereafter the dispute was referred for. adjudication vide order dated 02-06-2004 . It means that the proceedings before Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) started much earlier to the order of reference and the management was aware of the dispute . It must have retained the record at least for the Accounting Year 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 which must have been available with the management at the time it knew about arising of the dispute in the early 2004 , even if there was no order of the Tribunal to retain it . The action of the management in destroying the record even of 2002 shows that at least the record from 01-04-2001 to October 2002 was destroyed with malafide intention to defeat the claim of the poor workman. It may be presumed that ifthe record was retained and produced in the court it had supported the claim of theworkman.

According to the management there is no appointment letter available on record issued to the claimant and no wages or salary was ever drawn against her name. The salary for contingency paid workers like water carrier is not drawn against the name of the worker but against water carrier by designation from contingency and in the absence of any document on record the employment of the claimant with the management cannot be admitted .

It will be seen that the management is not in a position either to admit or deny the employment of the claimant in the absence of record . It has therefore , simply not admitted the claimant's case in this regard .

Inthis regard the statement of Purshottam Dass , Assistant Post Master, Bathinda Head Post Office who was examined as workman's witness makes an interesting and relevant reading . He has stated that "there is no record with the management which can show that Smt . Gurdev Kaur the workman had worked with the management except the document by which she was paid the allowances ."

Itmeans that the management has the documents by which the claimant was paid the allowances and also that she was in the employment of the management. At another place the witness said that the workman was paid out of contingency. Yet another place he said that the workman was paid as water carrier @ Rs . 1900 per month from 01-03-2001 to 28-02-2002. But after deposing so , the witness took a U turn and stated that it cannot be said that theamount ofallowances was paid to claimant or anybody else, male or female ; as there is no record and the receipts and records are destroyed after three years . I consider the later part of the statement of the witness as an afterthought and not reliable . The earlier part of his statement referred above shows that the claimant was in the employment of themanagement.

It is the case of the management that a waterman is a contingency paid employee and Attendance Register and Salary Register summoned by the workman are not maintained in respect of such class of employees . Sanction orders marked as ' B ' and ' C' filed by the workman witness and management official Purshottam Dass , Assistant Post Master show that vide paper marked ' C' Rs . 375 as water carrier allowance had been sanctioned by the competent authority in April 1993 to the Bathinda Head Office. Paper marked ' B ' of August 2001 shows the allowance amount was enhanced to Rs . 1275 P.M. From these documents of the management it is clear that the said allowance was available to Bathinda Head Office from 20-04-1993 to 28-02-2002 at least. It is interesting to note that management witness R.K. Sharma had earlier stated during his cross -examination that the management possesses the record to show as to whom the payment for waterman was made from 1993 to 2002. His statement had been deferred to enable him to produce the record but on the next date he stated that the record was destroyed under rules . He placed on record Annexure ' A' of Swami's P & T F.H.B- Vol. 1. The Annexure contains a list of certain documents showing period after which they may be destroyed and the list contains ' contingent sub vouchers ' and ' contingent bills' . The period of preservation ( in terms of complete account year) has been given 3 years with regard

The claimant in her affidavit has stated that she had been appointed as water woman in 1993 and her services were terminated with effect from 15-10-2002 . In rejoinder to the written statement of the management she has stated that she continuously served up to her termination . During cross - examination she said that she does not remember whenshe was engaged but she had served the management 3563 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17, 1933

award after due compliance be sent to the Central Government for further necessary action .

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अप्रैल , 2011

for 9 years . Management has failed to rebut his statement. Even if the relevant record of the period under reference has been destroyed the management could have rebutted the claimantby producing in evidence the officers /officials who remained posted in the office in question during the period under reference . But the management could not dare to do so . I see no reason to disbelieve the affidavit and statement of the claimant/ workman that she continuously served the management from the date of her appointment in 1993 to 15-10-2002 .

का. आ. 1277.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न नेवल कमांड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. II , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. सीजीआईटी -2/57 ऑफ 2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -14011 / 11 /2007- आईआर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 13th April , 2011

According to management , the services of contingency paid employee can be terminated validly. Admittedly neither the workman was given any retrenchment notice nor she was paid notice pay or retrenchment compensation. The claimant even if a part time employee or contingency paid employee is a workman for the purpose of the Act. Section 2 ( S) defines a ' workman' and it admits no exception in terms of status of workman . She being a workman is entitled to the protection of Section 25F of the Act . The services of claimant/workman were terminated in violation of Section 25F of the Act . Issue No. I is decided in favour of the workman and against the management .

Issue No. 2 .

S. O. 1277.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/57 of2009 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , No. II , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Western Naval Command and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-04-2011 .

[No. L- 14011 / 11 /2007- IR( DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.

The claimant has alleged that after the termination of her services the new hands were employed but in her statement she was unable to give the name of any person so employed. She has , therefore , failed to prove the violation of Section 25H of the Act . Issue No. 2 is decided against the claimant accordingly.

ANNEXURE

Issue No. 3.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : K.B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT- 2 /57 of 2009

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WESTERN NAVAL COMMAND

The ChiefAdministrative Officer, Headquarters Western Naval Command Shahid Bhagat Singh Road Mumbai -400 001 .

AND

Their Workman

From the findings given on issue No. I it is clear that the services of the claimant/ workman were terminated in violation of Section 25F of the Act . The termination of her service was therefore , illegal and void ab - initio . She has claimed her reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of service . She has not claimed regularization which otherwise also was not available to her as she was not appointed as per procedure of recruitment. Workman remained in service for about 9 years as water - man . Work is ofpermanent nature . Wages were paid to her on monthly basis . It is not the case of the management that she was gainfully employed after the termination of her services . In her cross -examination she has stated that she has been doing household these days and attending her family and children.

The General Secretary, Indian Naval Employees Union 12/14, Rajgir Chambers R.No. 60 , 7th floor, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road Opp. Old Custom House Mumbai -400 023 .

I find her entitled to the relief which she has claimed . The management is directed to reinstate the claimant within one month of receiving a copy of the award. She will be treated in service for the period of termination of her services and will get the back wages also for that period. The reference is answered accordingly in favour of the claimant and against the management . Let two copies of

1410GI/11-12 3564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17, 1933

APPEARANCES :

For the Employer

: No appearance .

For the Workman

: Mr. J.H.Sawant , Representative .

Mumbai , dated the 16th March, 2011 .

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L - 14011 / 11 /2007 - IR (DU) , dated 1-7-2009 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the demand of the Indian Naval Employees Um'on for financial upgradation of pay ofShri P. S. Mohakar , Carpenter SK , Shri H. G.Gund, Brush Painter SK and Shri V: R . Gujar, Auto Elec . HSK by the management of Western Naval Command is legal andjustified ? Ifyes , what relief the workmen are entitled to and from which date ? "

2. Both the parties were served with notices . In response to the notice the second party union has filed its statement of claim at Ex - 7 . According to them thousands of individual workers are working in the various establishments of the Navy at Mumbai under headquarters , Western Naval Command, Mumbai . The major industrial establishments like Naval Dockyard , Naval Armament Depot , Naval Depots are empowered to form their own Departmental Promotion Committee ( DPC ) to prepare select list and promotions are effected by their Administrative Head as and when vacancies arise . Similar procedure is adopted for giving time bound financial up- gradation to industrial workers under the Assured Carrier Progression Scheme ( ACPS ) introducedby Central Government in the year 1999 as per the recommendation of5th Central Pay Commission .

3. For industrial workers there is no annual confidential report . Their performance is noted down on cards as assessment cards by Manager. There are nearly 60 industrial workers attached to Naval Transport Pool , Colaba, Mumbai . The majority of industrial workers belong to automobile trade i.e. Autofitters , Autoelectricians , Cleaners, Tyreman , Lubricators etc.

4. In the year 2004 , certain promotions of industrial workers of Naval Transport Pool were effected by Head- quarter WNC in which senior workers were overruled for promotion and juniors were promoted . The aggrieved workers made representation but they got stereotype reply that they were not fit for promotions as per their annual confidential report . On the same ground time bound financial up - gradation was also refused to . It was brought to the notice of HQ , WNC that in the big naval

[ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] establishment there were nearly six thousand industrial workers . NT Pool has total 60 workers and nearly 20 of them were overruled for promotion for ACP benefits for less than 5 marks in the assessment cards . There were series of communications . However HQ WNC tried to create confusion . Therefore the matter was taken up to Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Mumbai . In spite of repeated discussions during conciliation proceeding , dispute could not be resolved and the Conciliation Officer sent his failure report to the Labour Ministry, Government of India. The Labour Ministry thus sent the reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . Shri R. S.Mohakar, Carpenter SK and V.R. Gujar, Auto Elect, HSK have been subsequently given promotions and they requested union to withdraw their names from this reference . As per the prayer ofthe union , these two names were withdrawn from the reference . The union herein prays thatHead Quarter , Western Naval Command , Mumbai be directed to give benefit of promotion to Shri H.G.Gund , Brush Painter SK with retrospective date.

5. The first party management was duly served with notice . However it remained absent and the claim proceeded ex -parte against it . The matter was adjourned for evidence on affidavit of the second party union . Instead offiling affidavit of the relevant witness , the representative of the union has filed purshis / application at Ex - 10 and requested that union do not want to proceed with the reference . Therefore he prays that the reference be disposed of for want of prosecution . In the light of purshis Ex- 10 , the reference deserves to be rejected for want of prosecution . Thus I pass the following Order:

ORDER

The reference stands rejected with no order as to costs .

Date: 16-03-2011

K. B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 13 अप्रैल , 2011

का. आ. 1278. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलॉजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. सीजीआईटीए-250 ऑफ 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -42012/129/98- आई आर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th April , 2011

S. O. 1278. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central 3565 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGITA- 250 of2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archaeological Survery of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-04-2011.

"Whether the action of the management Archaeological Survey of India in terminating the services of Smt Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar Vill . Modhera, TaL Chansma, Dist Mehsana instead of regularizing is justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled . "

[No. L-42012/ 129/98 - IR(DU)]

JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM LABOUR COURT, AHMEDABAD

Present

Binay Kumar Sinha, PresidingOfficer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 31st ofMarch . 2011

Reference : ITC No. 141 of 1999 Old

Reference: CGIT A of 250 of2004 New

1. Udyan Sahayak , Surya Mandir, Modhera, Dist-Mehsana .

2. Deputy Superintendent, Horticultural Archaeological, Survey of India, Division II , Safdar Jung Tomb , New Delhi 110003 .

..... First Party

Versus

Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar, Residing at Rohit Vas , Village Modhera , Ta- Chanasma , Dist-Mehsana.

..... Second Party

Shri P.M.Rami ,

For the first party employer :

Advocate,

(A.GP. )

For the workman second party : Shri Nilesh M. Shah, Advocate,

AWARD

2. The workman for contesting the dispute filed statement of claim stating therein that she was working as a daily wager Labourer since March , 1983 under the first party No.1 in the premise of Modhera Sun Temple . It has been claimed that she discharge her services continuously since from the date of appointment and had completed more than 240 days of work in each calendar year. Initially she was paid Rs . 8 per day and subsequently she was paid wages as per prescribed minimum wage of Rs . 44.33. Her presence was marked in the muster roll kept by first party No.1 ( Udyan Sahayak , Surya Mandir Modhera) . Further claim is that she was paid 26 days wages at the end of every month regularly on Vouchers . She was not granted benefits of regular employee with other benefits . Further claim is that her juniors namely Hemuji Gopalji Darbar, Ravishanker Maharaj , Chandubhai Khodidas , Babardan Ghadhvi and Ishwarbhai Desai , who were juniors to her working as a daily wagers under first party were made permanent and granted all benefits , whereas she was discriminated, without any reasons . Further case is that on the instruction of first party No.2 , the first party No.1 struck offher namefrom the muster rolt from 07-03-1996 and thus she was orally terminated from the services w.e.f. 07-03-1996 without following the rules and regulation . She was not given any compensation nor notice pay had been paid to her and the action of the first party is illegal and violation of Section 25 (F ) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. It has been further stated that after her termination , the first party appointed new workers on daily wages and at that time she was neither called for nor appointed which isalso breach of Section 25 (H ) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947, further stated that the action of first party amounts to unfair labour practice adopted against her. Further case is that she made representation to the first party on 20-07-1996 to 22-11-1996, but the first party did not give any reply nor considered her re -presentation through the statement of the claim , the workman prayed for grant of relief for setting aside her oral termination dated 07-03-1996 and for her reinstatement to original post and with full back- wages and continuity of service from 07-03-1996 , with further prayer for her regularization in the service and for grant of monetory and non monetory benefits and also other benefits to which she found entitle .

3.The first party by filing written reply disputing to the claim of the second party workman and taking such grounds that the Reference is bed in law and not tenable thatthe department of the first party (A.S.I. ) is not Industry The appropriate Government vide its order No. L-42012 / 129 / 98 - IR (DU) dated 22-07-1999 referred the dispute for adjudication under provision of clause (d ) of sub- section 1 ofsub - section 10 of I.D. Act 1947, as per the schedule which is as follows :-

3566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011/ VAISAKHA 17, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

ISSUES

( i) Whether the workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar completed 240 days of work in any calendar year under first party No.1 in the premise ofModhera Sun Temple? '

(ii ) Whether the second party workman could have been able to prove that the workman junior to herwere made regular for the works by the first party?

( iii) Whether the first party have violated provision ofsection 25 ( F) , 25 ( H) of the I.D. Act 1947 ?

(iv) Whether the workman is entitle for regularization ofwork?

(v) Whether she is entitle for reinstatement to the work of daily wages as casual labourer?

(vi) Whether ( she) workman is entitle for full back wages and continuity of service from 07-03- 1996?

(vii ) What relief if any the second party workman is entitle?

5. ISSUE NO . 1

so , the Industrial Dispute is not applicable to the department of first party. It has been contended by the first partythat the workman Smt . Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar was engaged as a casual labourer in the month of January 1983. She was engaged purely as casual labourer for need based seasonal operations w.e.f. 22-01-1983 for maintenance of garden at Modhera against approved estimate . Further , it has been denied that she ever completed 240days in any calendar year. Details of its work by the second party has been given vide para 6 of the reply that in the year 1983 second party work for 26 daysand from 1984-1987 NIL work, in the year 1988,45 days , in the year 1992, 26 days , and in 1993 work for 34 days, in the year 1995 work for 20 days and in the year 1996 work for 7 days . It has been stated that the aforesaid days ofwork done by the second party workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar is based on the wages register (muster roll ) maintained by the Respondents at the site which is authentic document and the first party can also produce original for perusal of the Tribunal when ask by the Tribunal . It has been stated that the second party Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar was paid wages @ Rs . 8 per day from 21-01-1983 . There was no such rate of Rs . 44.30 fordaily wagers as claimed by her, but w.e.f 15-01-1995 to 23-07-1997 the casual labourers were paid their wages @ Rs 41.58 per day according to the rates approved by the Labour Commissioner, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) . Further contention is that , that names of the workman given in the para of the statement of claim were senior to the second party workman Hansaben and were made permanent considering their completion of 240 days continuous work for more than 2 years , as per government rules and no casual labourer junior to Hansaben has been made permanent who has not completed 240 days in the year. On the contrary the workman Hansaben never completed 240days in any calendar year so , the question of paying compensation or notice pay does not arise . And for the reasons she was not considered for regularization since she has not completed 240 days of work . Further case is that after seasonal work her services were not required hence terminated. It has been also stated. that the first party had to engage casual labourer for seasonal operation for maintenance of garden at Sun Temple, Modhera of national importance. The workman Hansaben was called for work but she refused to work in the garden . Such stand has also been taken that the first party has no objection if Smt . Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar is given preference for engagement on daily wages purely on casual basis and need based seasonal work by the Udhyan Sahayak , ( first party No.1 ) as and when required , but the back wages w.e.f. 07-03-1996 with continuity of service is not admissible to the workman under rules . On these grounds prayer is made to reject theReference .

4. Inview ofthe pleadings of the parties the following issues are taken up for consideration and determination.

The second party workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar on affidavit supported her case as per statement of claim and was cross - examinedby the first party lawyer . She claim through her oral evidence that some junior to her were regularized in the service of the first party for works in Modhera Sun Temple , whereas her case was not considered and she was discriminated . The claim and evidence ofthe second party workman is to the effect that since after , her engagement as daily wages labourer she completed 240 days of work in every year. But even then she was not regularized rather she was terminated. On behalf of the second party workman , an application had been submitted before the Tribunal in production ofthe documents -muster roll from the year 1983 to 1996, and direction was also given to the first party to produce those documents - muster roll and another documents. It is very clear case of the first party management as per its reply to the statement of claim vide para No. 6 , that the first party have no objection to produce same before the Tribunal as and when ask for proving the fact that the concern workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar never completed 240 days of work in any calendar year, rather the wages register maintain by the first party No. I will corroborate and prove stand ofthe firstparty taken in para 6. Regarding the works done by the workman - only 26 days in 1983, NIL days in the year 1984 to 1987, 45 days in the year 1988,26 days in the year 1992,34 daysin 1993,20 days in 1995 and 07 days in the year 1996 . Upondirection of the Tribunal for production of documents entire wage register (muster roll) the first party produced those Xerox copy before the Tribunal by filing an application also mentioning therein that if the, Tribunal 3567 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011/वैशाख 17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

requires to produce the original , the same could also be produced. Xerox copy of the wage register from the year 1983 and onward up to 1996 is attached with the record.

workman Hansaben and were very much regular in job and as per list produced by the second party for making them regular, it is proved that those workman's have had completed 240 days of works for consecutive 3 calendar years or 2 calendar years and so , their case for regularizatión were considered . It also go to disprove the contention of the workman Hansaben that the , first party management had adopted discriminating norms against her. So , it is proved that some of the workman who were regularize by the first party for work were senior to the second party workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar . This issue is also decided against second party workman.

8. ISSUE NO . III

The second party workman could not showfrom those copies ofregister /muster roll that she ever completed works in any of the month for entire working days or that she had completed 240days of works in any of the calendar year . Onthe other hand the management witness Naresh Kumar Ahir through his evidence refuted to the claim made under statement of claim by the second party and also refuted to the oral testimony of the workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar, as per her affidavit that she ever completed 240 days ofwork in any calendar year and also refuted that any other workman who was junior to her was regularize by the first party, ignoring the case of the workman . Rather, it has been supported to the reply of the first party by the management witness that only those workers who were senior to Hansaben in the list as daily workers and who have also completed 240 days of works in at least 2 calendar years, were only considered for regularization as per rules whereas Hansaben (second party workman ) had never completed 240 days in any calendar year. So , she was not regularize , rather the work done by the second party workman was of seasonal nature and so having no requirement she was terminated and her name struck from the muster roll .

As per findings to issue No.1 and 2 and also considering the oral and documentary evidence of the first party management , it is held that the first party have not violated the provision of either 25 (F) or 25 ( H) of the ID Act1947, the status of the second party workman was of a casual labourer not completed her works of the 240 days in any calendar year. She was receiving wages on the basis of her attendance made in the register. In some months , there were only attendance of 2 days and accordingly she was paid wages for only 2 days . So , there was no need for providing any compensation to the second party by the first party, in case of her termination . There was also no need for the first party to sent notice or in lieu notice pay to the second party workman . This issue is decided in favour ofthe first party.

9. ISSUE NO . IV

Since the workman Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar had never completed 240 days of work in any of the calendar year during the tenure of work from January 1983 up to 1996 July, rather she had not even completed works of 100 days in any calendar year. So , her demand for regularization is devoid of any merit and so , she is not entitled to claim for her regularization . Making comparison with aforesaid 5 workman's who had been regularized by the first party only whenthey had completed 240 days of works in a calendar year, 2 years or more years . This issue is therefore decided against second party workman

10. ISSUE NO . VI

6. From the evidence of the workman as per her affidavit it is proved that she was doing service as daily wager. From the evidence of the management witness , and also the documents , the Xerox copies of wage register. It is also prove that the second party workman had never worked regularly even for a month and she was paid daily wages on marking of her attendance only and for the absentee period she had not been paid. Xerox copies of wage register, also go to prove the contention of the first party taken at para 6 as to the number of days on which only the second party workman Hansaben worked. So , as per discussions made above , I find that the claim of second party workman Hansaben that she worked for 240 days in every calendar year is falsified by the document (wage register ) produced by the first party. Whereas the 1st party has successfully discharged its onus in disproving the claim of the first party that she never worked for 240 days in a calendar year . For the reasons noted above this issue is decided against the second party workman.

7. ISSUE NO . II

As per findings given in the foregoing paragraphs and that the second party workman also having no any merit in her case for claiming regularization so , she is not entitle for any backwages and continuity of service right from her oral termination dated 07-03-1996 .

11. ISSUE NO. V & VII

Inview ofthe stand at para 11 in its reply by the first party that they had no objection , if Smt . Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar is given preference for engagement on daily wages purely on casual basis and need based seasonal works by the Udyan Sahayak ( first party No.1 ) as and when required . But the backwages w.e.f. 07-03-1996 with continuity of service is not admissible under the rules .. Considering the facts that the second party workman There is only oral evidence ofthe second party herself thatsome of the workman namely Hemuji Gopalji Darbar, Ravishanker Maharaj , Chandubhai Khodidas , Babardan Ghadhvi and Ishwarbhai Desai , were junior to her , but no any document could have been produced on behalf of the second party to substantiate such claim . On the other hand the first party by producing Xerox copies of the wage register containing the names ofthe daily wager workman, according to their seniority has successfully proved that those 5 workman's were senior to that of the concern

1410 GI /11-13 3568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7 , 2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar is residing at Modhera where Sun Temple at Modhera is situated , and also considering that the second party workman had worked though not regularly but as a casual labourer in the premises of the SunTemple, Modhera . So, she is to be reinstated by giving preference for her engagement on daily wages on casual basis and need based seasonal work by the first party No.1 Udyan Sahayak. Besides this the second party is found not entitle for any other relief.

In view of the findings above , the award is passed for reinstatement of Hansaben Ratnabhai Chamar on daily wages labourer on need based seasonal work by the first partygiving preference to other daily wages workers engaged for seasonal works .

Dictated BINAY KUMAR SINHA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अप्रैल , 2011

का. आ. 1279.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलॉजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. सीजीआईटीए-216 ऑफ 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-4-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012 / 130/98- आई आर( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 13th April , 2011

S. O. 1279. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGITA- 216 of2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archaeological Survery of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-04-2011 .

[No. L-42012/ 130/ 98 - IR(DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, AHMEDABAD

Present : Binay Kumar Sinha . Presiding Officer , CGIT-cum - Labour Court, Ahmedabad,

Dated31st of March . 2011 .

Reference: ITC No. 140 of 1999 Old

Reference: CGITA of 216 of 2004 New

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 1. Udyan Sahayak , SuryaMandir, Modhera, Dist Mehsana .

2. Deputy Superintendent ,

Horticultural Archaeological , Survey of India, Division II, Safdar Jung Tomb , New Delhi - 110003

..... First Party

Versus

JivibenGovabhai Chamar,

Residing at Rohit Vas , VillageModhera , Ta -Chanasma , Dist-Mehsana.

.Second Party For the first party employer

: Shri P.M.Rami , Advocate, (A.GP. )

For the workman second party

Shri Nilesh M. Shah, Advocate ,

AWARD

The appropriate Govemment vide its order No. L-42012/130/ 98 - IR ( DU) fated 22-07-1999 referred the dispute for adjudication under provision of clause ( d) of sub- section 1 of Section 10 of I.D. Act 1947 , as per the schedule which is as follows .

SCHEDULE

" Whether the action of the management of Archaeological Survey of India in terminating the services of Smt Jiviben Govabhai Chamar Vill . Modhera , Tal Chansma , Dist Mehsana instead of regularizing is justified ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled . ? "

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Khodidas , Babardan Ghadhvi and Ishwarbhai Desai , who were juniors to her working as a daily wagers under first party were made permanent and granted all benefits , whereas she was discriminated , without any reasons . Further case is that on the instruction of first party No.2, the first partyNo. 1 struck off her name from the muster roll from 07-03-1996 and thus she was orally terminated from the services w.e.f. 07-03-1996 without following the rules and regulation . She was not given any compensation nor notice pay had been paid to her and the action of the first party is illegal and violation of Section 25 ( F ) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. It has been further stated that after her termination the first party appointed new workers on daily wages and at that time she was neither called for nor appointed which is also breach of Section 25 (H) of the I.D. Act, 1947 , further stated that the action of first party amounts to unfair labour practice adopted against her. Further case is that she made representation tothe first party on 20-07-1996 to 22-11-1996, but the first party did not given any reply nor considered her representation through the statement of the claim , the workman prayed for grant of relief for setting aside her oral termination dated 07-03-1996 and for her reinstatement to original work and with full back- wages and continuity of service from 07-03-1996, with further prayer for her regularization in the service and for grant of monetory and non monetory benefits and also other benefits to which she found entitle .

3569

contention is that that names of the workman given in the para of the statement of claim were senior to the second party workman Jiviben and were made permanent considering their completion of240 days continuous work for more than 2 years , as per government rules and no casual labourer junior to Jiviben has been made permanent who has not completed 240 days in the year. On the contrary the workman Jiviben never completed 240 days in any calendar year so , the question of paying compensation or notice pay does not arise. And for the reasons she was not considered for regularization since she has not completed 240 days of work. Further case is that after seasonal work her services were not required hence terminated . It has been also stated that the first party had to engage casual labourer for seasonal operation for maintenance of garden at Sun Temple , Modhera of national importance . The workman Jiviben was called for work but she refused to work in the garden . Such stand has also been taken that the first party has no objection if Smt. Jiviben Govabhai Chamar is given preference for engagement on daily wages purely on casual basis and need based seasonal work by the Udyan Sahayak, ( first party No.1 ) as and when required , but the back wages w.e.f. 07-03-1996 with continuity of service is not admissible to the workman under rules . On these grounds prayer is made to reject the Reference .

4.In view ofthe pleadings of the parties the following issues are taken up for consideration and determination .

ISSUES

(i) Whether the workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar completed 240 days of work in any calendar year under first party No.1 in the premise of Modhera Sun Temple ?

(ii) Whether the second party workman could have been able to prove that the workman junior to her were made regular for the works by the first party?

( iii) Whether the first party have violated provision ofSection 25 ( F ) , 25 ( H ) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 (iv) Whether the workman is entitle for regularization of work ?

(v) Whether she is entitle for reinstatement to the work ofdaily wages as casual labourer ?

(vi ) Whether (she ) workman is entitle for full back wagesand continuity of service from 7-3-1996 ?

(vii) What relief, ifany , the second party workman isentitle?

5. ISSUE NO . I

3. The first party by filing written reply disputing to the claim of the second party workman and taking such grounds that the Reference is bad in law and not tenable that the department of the first party (A.S.I. ) is not Industry so , the Industrial Dispute is not applicable to the department of first party. It has been denied that Smt. Jiviben Govabhai Chamar ever completed 240 days of work in a calendar year. It has been stated that she was engaged as casual Labourer in the month of January 1988 and not in, March 1983 as claimed by her. She was engaged purely as casual labourer for need based seasonal operation w.e.f. 12-01-1988 for maintenance of garden at Modhera against approved estimate . She had never completed 240 days in any calendar year , rather she worked only45 days in 1988 , NIL days in the year 1992 and 1993 , 36 days in the year 1994 , 20 days in the year 1995 and 7 daysin the year 1996. It has been claimed that the aforesaid details of works as daily wager of the second party workman are based on the wages register ( muster roll ) maintained by the first party No.1 at the site which is authentic document . It has not been disputed that workman Jivibenwas paid wages @ Rs . 8 per day from 12-01-1988 . It has been disputed that there was no such rate of 44.30 for daily wagers as claimed by her, but w.e.f. 15-01-1995 to 23-07-1997 the casual labourers were paid their wages @ Rs . 41.58 per day according to the rates approved by the Labour Commissioner, Ahmedabad (Gujarat). Further The second party workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar on affidavit supported her case as per statement 3570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MAY 7 , 2011 / VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] of claim and was cross - examined by the first party lawyer.

6. From the evidence of the workman as per her affidavit , it is proved that she was doing service as daily wager. From the evidence of the management witness , and also the documents , the Xerox copies of wage register, it is also proved that the second party workman had never worked regularly even for a month and she was paid daily wages on marking of her attendance only and for the absentee period she had not been paid Xerox copies of wage register , also go to prove the contention of the first party taken at para 6 as to the number of days on which only the second party workman Jiviben worked. So , as per discussion made above I find that the claim of second party workman Jiviben that she worked for 240 days in every calendar year, is falsified by the document (wage register) produced by the first party. Whereas the 1st party has successfully discharged its onus in disproving the claim of the second party that she never worked for 240 days in a calendar year. For the reasons noted above this issue is decided against the second party workman .

7. ISSUE NO . ΙΙ

There is only oral evidence of the second party herself that some of the workman namely Hemuji Gopalji Darbar , Ravishanker Maharaj , Chandubhai Khodidas , Babardan Ghadhvi and Ishwarbhai Desai , were junior to her, but no any document could have been produced on behalf of the second party to substantiate such claim . On the other hand the first party by producing Xerox copies of the wage register containing the names of the daily wager workman , according to their seniority has successfully proved that those 5 workman were senior to that of the concern workman Jiviben and were very much regular injob and as par list produced by the 1st party for making them regular, it is proved that those workman have had completed 240 days of works for consecutive 3 calendar years or 2 calendar years and so , their case for regularization were considered . It also go to disprove the contention of the workman Jiviben that the first party management had adopted discriminating norms against her. So , it is proved that some of the workman who were regularized by the first party for work were senior to the second party workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar. This issue is also decided against second party workman.

8. ISSUE NO . ΠΙ

She claimed through her oral evidence that some junior to her were regularized in the service of the first party for works in Modhera Sun Temple , whereas her case was not considered and she was discriminated . The claim and. evidence of the second party workman is to the effect that since after her engagement as daily wages labourer, she completed 240 days of work in every year. But even then she was not regularized rather she was terminated . On behalf of the second party workman , an application had been submitted before the Tribunal for production of the documents -muster roll from the year 1983 to 1996 , and direction was also given to the first party to produce those documents - muster rolls and other documents . It is very clear case of the first party management as per its reply to the statement of claim vide para No. 6, that the first party have no objection to produce same before the Tribunal as and when asked for proving the fact that the concern workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar never completed 240 days of work in any calendar year, rather the wages register maintain by the first party No.1 will corroborate and prove stand of the first party taken in para 6 regarding the works done by the workman - only 45 days in 1988 , NIL days in the year 1992 and 1993 , 36 days'in the year 1994 , 20 days in the year 1995 and 7 days in the year 1996. Upon direction of the Tribunal for production of documents entire wage register ( muster roll) the first party produced Xerox copies before the Tribunal by filing an application also mentioning therein that if the Tribunal requires to produce the original , the same could also be produced . Xerox copies of the wage register from the year 1983 and onward up to 1996 is attached with the record . The second party workman could not show from those copies of register/ muster roll that she ever completed works in any of the month for entire working days or that she had completed 240 days ofworks in any of the calendar year . On the other hand the management witness Naresh Kumar Ahir through his evidence refuted to the claim made under statement of claim by the second party and also refuted to the oral testimony of the workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar , as per her affidavit that she ever completed 240 days ofwork in any calendar year and also refuted that any other workman who was junior to her was regularize by the first party, ignoring the case of the workman . Rather it has been supported to the reply of the first party by the management witness that only those workers who were senior to Jiviben in the list as daily workers and who have also completed 240 days of works in at least 2 calendar years, were only considered for regularization as per rules whereas Jiviben ( second party workman ) had never completed 240 days in any calendar year. So , she was not regularize , rather the work done by the second party workman was of seasonal nature and so having no requirement she was terminated and her name struck off from the muster roll .

As per findings to issue No. I and 2 and also considering the oral and documentary evidence of the first party management , it is held that the first party have not violated the provision of either 25 ( F ) or 25 ( H ) of the ID Act 1947, the status of the second party workman was of a casual labourer not completed her works of the 240 days in any calendar year . She was receiving wages on the basis of her attendance made in the register. In some months , there were only attendance of 2 days and accordingly she was paid wages for only 2 days . So , there was no need for providing any compensation to the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

second party by the first party, in case of her termination . There was also no need for the first party to sent notice or in lieu notice pay to the second party workman . This issue is decided in favour of the first party.

9. ISSUE NO . IV

Since the workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar had never completed 240 days of work in any of the calendar year during the tenure of work from January 1988 up to July1996 . Rather she had not even completed works of 100 days in any calendar year . So , her demand for regularization is devoid of any merit and so, she is not entitledto claim for her regularization . Making comparison with aforesaid 5 workman's who had been regularized by the first party only when they had completed 240 days of works in a calendar year, 2 years or more years . This issue istherefore decided against second party workman .

10. ISSUE NO . VI

As per findings given in the foregoing paragraph and that the second party workman also having no merit in her case for claiming regularization , she is not entitle for any backwages and continuity of service right from her oral termination dated 7-3-1996 .

11. ISSUE NO . V & VII

In view of the stand at para 11 in its reply by the first party that they had no objection , if Smt. Jiviben Govabhai Chamar is given preference for engagement on daily wages purely on casual basis , and need based seasonal works by the Udyan Sahayak ( first party No.1 ) as and when required . But the backwages w.e.f. 7-3-1996 with continuity of service is not admissible under the rules considering the facts that the second party workman Jiviben Govabhai Chamar is residing at Modhera, where Sun Temple at Modhera is situated , and also considering that the second party workman had worked though not regularly but as a casual labourer in the premises of the Sun Temple , Modhera . So , she is to be reinstated by giving preference for her engagement on daily wages on casual basis and need based seasonal work by the first party No.1 Udyan Sahayak . Besides this the second party is found not entitle for any other relief.

In view of the findings above the award is passed for reinstatement of Jiviben Govabhai Chamar on daily wages labourer on need based seasonal work by the first party giving preference to other daily wages workers , engaged for seasonal works .

BINAY KUMAR SINHA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल , 2011

का. आ. 1280.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा 91 - क के साथ पठित धारा 88 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतद्वारा अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट कारखानों/स्थापनाओं के नियमित कर्मचारियों को उक्त

3571

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7 , 2011 /वैशाख 17 , 1933

अधिनियम के प्रचालन से छूट प्रदान करती है । यह छूट इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से एक वर्ष तक की अवधि के लिए प्रभावी होगी ।

2. उक्त छूट निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन है; अर्थात्:-

( 1 ) पूर्वोक्त स्थापना जिसमें कर्मचारी नियोजित हैं, एक रजिस्टर रखेगी , जिसमें छूट प्राप्त कर्मचारियों के नाम और पदनाम दिखाये जायेंगे;

(2 ) इस छूट के होते हुए भी , कर्मचारी उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन ऐसी प्रसुविधाएं प्राप्त करते रहेंगे जिनको पाने के लिए वे इस अधिसूचना द्वारा दी गई छूट के प्रवृत्त होने की तारीख से पूर्व संदत्त अंशदानों के आधार पर हकदार हो जाते हैं;

(3 ) छूट प्राप्त अवधि के लिए , यदि कोई अभिदाय पहले ही किए जा चुके हों , तो वे वापस नहीं किए जाएंगे ;

(4) उक्त कारखाने/स्थापना का नियोजक उस अवधि की बाबत जिसके दौरान उस कारखाने/स्थापना पर उक्त अधिनियम (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अवधि कहा गया है ) प्रवर्तमान था ऐसी विवरणियां, ऐसे प्रारूप में और ऐसी विशिष्टियों सहित देगा जो कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा (साधारण ) विनियम , 1950 के अधीन उसे उक्त अवधि की बाबत देनी अपेक्षित होती थी;

(5 ) निगम द्वारा उक्त कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम की धारा 45 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन नियुक्त किया गया कोई निरीक्षक या निगम का इस निमित्त प्राधिकृत कोई अन्य पदधारी;

(i) धारा 44 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , उक्त अवधि की बाबत दी गई किसी विवरण की विशिष्टयों को सत्यापित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ; अथवा

( ii ) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा ( साधारण ) विनियम , 1950 द्वारा यथाअपेक्षित रजिस्टर और अभिलेख उक्त अवधि के लिए रखे गये थे या नहीं; या

( iii ) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी , नियोजक द्वारा दिये गए उन फायदों को, जिसके फलस्वरूप इस अधिसूचना के अधीन छूट दी जा रही है , नकद में और वस्तु रूप में पाने का हकदार बना हुआ है या नहीं; या

(iv) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि उस अवधि के दौरान, जब उक्त कारखाने के संबंध में अधिनियम के उपबंध प्रवृत्त थे, ऐसे किन्ही उपबंधों का अनुपालन किया गया था या नहीं, [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii )] 3572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 7,2011 /VAISAKHA 17 , 1933

ofthe said Act . The exemption shall be effective from the date of issue of this Notification for a period of one year.

निम्नलिखित कार्य करने के लिए सशक्त होगा :-

2. The above exemption is subject to the following conditions namely : -

(1 ) The aforesaid establishments wherein the (क) प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक से अपेक्षा करना कि वह उसे ऐसी जानकारी दे जिसे वह इस अधि- नियम के प्रयोजनार्थ आवश्यक समझता है ; अथवा

employees are employed shall maintain a register showing the name and designations of the exempted employees ' ; (2) Not withstanding this exemption , the employees shall continue to receive such benefits under the said Act to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from which exemption granted by this notification operates;

(3) The contributions for the exempted period , if already paid, shall not be refundable ;

(ख) ऐसे प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक के अधिभोगाधीन , किसी कारखाने , स्थापना , कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में किसी भी उचित समय पर प्रवेश करना और उसके प्रभारी से यह अपेक्षा करना कि वह व्यक्तियों के नियोजन और मजदूरी के संदाय से संबंधित ऐसे लेखा , बहियां और अन्य दस्तावेज , ऐसे निरीक्षक या अन्य पदाधारी के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करें और उनकी परीक्षा करने दें या ऐसी जानकारी दें जिसे वे आवश्यक समझते है; या

(4) The employer of the said factory/ establishment shall submit in respect of the period during which that factory was subject to the operation of the said Act (hereinafter referred as the said period ) , such returns in such forms and containing such particulars as were due from it in respect of the said period under the Employees ' State Insurance (General ) Regulations , 1950;

(ग) प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक की, उसके अभिकर्ता या सेवक की , या ऐसे किसी को , जो ऐसे कारखाने , स्थापना , कार्यालय या परिसर में पाया जाए, यह विश्वास करने का युक्तियुक्त कारण है कि वह कर्मचारी है , परीक्षा करना; या

(5) Any Social Security Officer appointed by the Corporation under Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 45 of the said ESI Act or other official ofthe Corporation authorized inthis behalf by it, shall , for the purpose of :-

(घ) ऐसे कारखाने , स्थापना , कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में रखे गए किंसी रजिस्टर , लेखा , बही या अन्य दस्तावेज की नकल तैयार करना या उद्धरण लेना;

(i) Verifying the particulars contained in any returned submitted under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 44 for the said period ; or (ड. ) यथानिर्धारित अन्य शक्तियों का प्रयोग करना ।

(ii) Ascertaining whether registers and records were maintained as required by the Employees ' State Insurance ( General ) Regulations , 1950 for the said period ; or 6. विनिवेश/निगमीकरण के मामले में , प्रदत्त छूट स्वतः रद्द ही जाएगी और तब नए प्रतिष्ठान को छूट हेतु समुचित सरकार की अनुमति लेनी होगी ।

अनुसूची

स्थापना कारखाने का नाम

क्रम संख्या

(iii) Ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer in cash and kind being benefits in consideration ofwhich exemption is being granted under this notification; or भारत इलैक्ट्रॉनिक्स लि. , मछलीपट्टनम इकाई , आंध्र प्रदेश

भारत इलैक्ट्रॉनिक्स लि. , हैदराबाद इकाई,

आंध्र प्रदेश

(iv) Ascertaining whether any of the provisions of the Act had been complied with during the period when such provisions were in force in relation to the said factory to be empowered to:

राष्ट्रीय पर्यावरण इंजीनियरिंग अनुसंधान संस्थान , नागपुर की सभी प्रयोगशालाओं/संस्थानों सहित ।

(a) require the principal or immediate employer to him such information as he may consider necessary for the purpose ofthis Act; or

[सं. एस-38014/9/2010- एसएस-1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th April , 2011

(b) at any reasonable time enter any factory, establishment, office or other premises occupied by such principal or immediate employer at any reasonable time and require any person found in charge thereof to produce to such inspector or other official and allow him to examine accounts , books and other documents S.O. 1280.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 88 read with section 91 - A of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees of factories/ establishments specified in the schedule from the operation 3573

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 7, 2011 /वैशाख17 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल , 2011

relating to the employment of personal and payment of wages or to furnish to him such information as he may consider necessary; or

का. आ. 1281.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि भारतीय खाद्य निगम में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि6 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है , उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए । (c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his agent or servant, or any person found in such factory, establishment, office or other premises or any person whom the said inspector or other official has reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee ; or

अतः , अब , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है । (d) make copies of or take extracts from any register , account book or other document maintained in such factory, establishment , office or other premises ,

[सं. एस-11017/5/91- आई आर ( पीएल ) ]

रविमाथुर, अपर सचिव (e) exercise such other powers as may be prescribed.

New Delhi , the 27th April , 2011 6. In case of disinvestment/corporatization , the exemption granted shall become automatically cancelled and then the new entity will have to approach the appropriate Government for exemption .

SCHEDULE

Sl . Name ofthe Establishment/Factory

S.O. 1281.-Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest requires that the services in the Food Corporation of India (FCI) which is covered by item 6 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , should be declared to be a Public Utility Service for the purposes ofthe saidAct .

No.

1. Bharat Electronics Ltd. , Machillipatnam Unit , Andhra Pradesh

2. Bharat Electronics Ltd. , Hyderabad Unit , Andhra Pradesh

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bysub -clause (vi ) ofclause (n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a Public Utility Service for the purpose ofthe said Act for a period ofsix months .

3. National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur induding all Laboratories/Institutes

[No. S- 11017/5/91 - IR(PL) ] RAVI MATHUR, Addl . Secy .

[No. S- 38014/9 /2010- SS -I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road,

and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi -110054.