This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007 /2003--05 रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 8 जनवरी 14 , 2012 , शनिवार पौष 18 पौष 24 , 1933

सं. 2]

NEW DELHI , JANUARY 8 JANUARY 14, 2012 , SATURDAY/PAUSA 18- PAUSA 24, 1933

No. 2]

भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग ।। खण्ड 3-उप - खण्ड ( ii )

PART II-Section 3-Sub-section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training ) ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

New Delhi, the 30th December , 2011 नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2011

S.O. 100. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 ( Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Smt . Sonia Mathur , Advocate , a Retainer Counsel of Central Bureau of Investigation in the Delhi High Court at New Delhi as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution , appeals / revisions or other proceedings arising out of cases related to 2G Spectrum cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the Court of Special Judge ( 2G Spectrum cases) , Central Bureau of Investigation , New Delhi and appellate/ revisional courts .

का.आ. 100.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा अपराध प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम संख्या 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली में विशेष न्यायाधीश के न्यायालय में ( 2 जी स्पेक्ट्रम मामले ) केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो , नई दिल्ली द्वारा अन्वेषण किए गए 2 जी स्पेक्ट्रम मामलों से संबंधित अपील , पुनरीक्षण तथा अपीलीय तथा पुनरीक्षण न्यायालयों में अभियोजन का संचालन करने के लिए केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के रिटेनर काउंसिल श्रीमती सोनिया माथुर , वकील को विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है।

[F. No. 225/ 17/2011 - AVD - 11 ( Part -1 ) !

[फा. सं. 225/17/2011 - एवीडी- II ( भाग -1) ]

RAJIV JAIN , Under Secy.

राजीव जैन , अवर सचिव

(265)

2G1/2012 266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2011

(6) Shri Siddhesh Kotwal

(7) Shri Vivek Chandrasekhar

(8) Shri Guntur Pramod Kumar

(9) Ms. Prerna Singh

(10) Shri Nikhil Borwankar

[ F. No. 225 / 17/ 2011 - A VD- II ( Part - 1 ) ] RAJIV JAIN , Under Secy.

का.आ. 101.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा अपराध प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम संख्या 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो , नई दिल्ली ( 2 जी स्पेक्ट्रम मामलों ) विशेष न्यायाधीश के न्यायालय में 2 जी स्पेक्ट्रम से संबंधित मामलों के अभियोजन का संचालन करने में तथा इस क्रम में उद्भूत अथवा इससे संबंधित अन्य किसी मामले में श्री यू. यू. ललित, विशेष सलाहकार की सहायता के लिए निम्नोक्त वकीलों की विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है : -

वित्त मंत्रालय

1. श्री मेहुल शर्मा

(राजस्व विभाग )

2. श्री शुभ्रांश पाधी

( सीमा शुल्क , केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क व सेवा कर आयुक्त का कार्यालय हैदराबाद- III आयुक्तालय ) 3. श्री जीसल बाही

हैदराबाद , 5 दिसम्बर , 2011 4. श्री कबीर शंकर बोस

सं. 04/2011 - कस. ( एनटी ) 5. श्री संग्राम सिंह सरोन

6. श्री सिदेश कोटवाल

7. श्री विवेक चंद्रशेखर

8. श्री गुंदुर प्रमोद कुमार

9. कु. प्रेरणा सिंह

10. श्री निखिल बोरवांकर

का.आ. 102.-भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना सं. 33/94- कस्टम्स ( एन टी ) , दिनांक 1-7-1994 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के नालगोंडा जिले के बोम्मलरामरम क्षेत्र के चीकटीमामिडी गांव की सर्वेक्षण सं. 179 की 5.29 एकड़ भूमि और सर्वेक्षण सं. 180 की 0.31% भूमि को, सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 के 52 ) की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत , निजी गैर सरकारी अनुबंधबद्ध भंडागारण ( 100% निर्यात आधारित इकाई ) के उद्देश्य से भंडारण स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित करता हूं।

[फा. सं. 225/ 17/2011 - एवीडी- II (भाग-1 ) ]

[फा. सी . सं. VIII/48/24/2011- तक. कस. ] अशोक, आयुक्त

राजीव जैन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2011

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

(OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS , CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX HYDERABAD- III COMMISSIONERATE ) Hyderabad, the 5th December, 2011

No. 04/2011 -Cus . ( NT) S.O. 101. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutor to assist Shri U. U. Lalit, Special Counsel in conducting prosecution of cases related to 2G Spectrum in the Court of Special Judge (2G Spectrum cases ), Central Bureau of Investigation , New Delhi and any other matter connective therewith or incidental thereto.

( 1 ) Shri Mehul Sharma

(2) Shri Shubhranshu Padhi

(3) Shri Jesal Wahi

S.O. 102. In exercise of the powers conferred by Notification No. 33 /94-Customs ( NT) dated 1-7-1994 of theGovernment of India , Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue, New Delhi , I hereby declare 5.29 Acres of Land in Sy. No. 179 and 0.31½ Acres of and in Sy . No. 180 in Cheekatimamidi Village , Bommalaramaram Mandal , Nalgonda District , in the state of Andhra Pradesh , to be a Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962 ) for the purpose of licensing of Private Bonded Warehouse ( 100 % Export Oriented Unit).

(4) Shri Kabir Shankar Bose

(5) Shri Sangram Singh Saron

[ F. C. No. VIII/48 /24/2011 -Tech . -Cus . ] ASHOK, Commissioner भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

हैदराबाद , 30 दिसम्बर , 2011

267

2

3

सं. 05/2011 -कस. ( एनटी)

एम.एस. ( आर्थो)

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी

(अस्थिरोग विज्ञान ) "

का.आ. 103.- भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना सं. 33 /94- कस्टम्स ( एन . टी. ) , दिनांक 1-7-1994 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के नालगोंडा जिले के नारकेटपल्ली क्षेत्र के येल्लारेड्‌डीगुडा गांव की सर्वेक्षण सं. 174 से 179 तक की भूमि को , सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 के 52 ) की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत , 100 प्रतिशत निर्यात आधारित इकाई के गठन के प्रयोजन के लिए भंडारण स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित करता हूं।

[फा. सी. सं. VIII /48/28/2011- कस. ] अशोक, आयुक्त Hyderabad , the 30th December, 2011 No. 05/2011 -Cus . ( NT)

S.O. 103.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Notification No. 33 /94-Customs (NT) dated 1-7-1994 of the Government of India , Ministry of Finance , Department ofRevenue , New Delhi , I hereby declare the land at Survey Nos . 174 to 179 of Yellareddyguda Village , Narketpally Mandal , Nalgonda District, in the State of Andhra Pradesh to be a Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 ( 52 of 1962 ) for the purpose of setting up of 100% Export Oriented Unit .

[F. C. No. VIII/48/28/2011 -Cus . ]

ASHOK, Commissioner स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ( स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 104.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद से परामर्श करने के बाद मानद विश्वविद्यालय के नाम में परिवर्तन होने के कारण एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

( यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह एस. एन. मेडिकल कॉलेज , आगरा ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के बारे में आगरा विश्वविद्यालय/डॉ. बी. आर. अम्बेडकर विश्वविद्यालय , आगरा , द्वारा 1976 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

[फा. सं. यू. 12012/95/2011 - एमई ( पी.11 ) ] अनीता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव सभी के लिए टिप्पणी । स्नातकोत्तर पाठ्यक्रम को प्रदान की गई ऐसी मान्यता की अधिकतम अवधि 5 वर्षों के लिए होगी जिसके उपरांत इसका नवीकरण कराना होगा।

2. मान्यता को उप- खंड 4 की आवश्यकता के अनुसार समय पर नवीकरण न कराए जाने पर संबंधित स्नातकोत्तर पाठ्यक्रम में प्रवेश निरपवाद रूप से बंद हो जाएंगे ।

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 20th December , 2011

S.O. 104. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2 ) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , due to change in name of affiliating University namely:--

(a) against "Agra University/ Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra " under the heading ' Recognised Medical Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' [ hereinafter referred to as column(3 )] , the following shall be inserted , namely :---

(3)

(2)

MS(Ortho.)

"Master of Surgery

(Orthopaedics) "

( क ) " आगरा विश्वविद्यालय /डॉ. बी. आर. अम्बेडकर विश्वविद्यालय , आगरा " , के समक्ष शीर्षक " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता " [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Agra University,/ Dr . B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra in respect of students being trained atS. N. Medical College , Agra (Uttar Pradesh) on or after 1976 .

268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 / PAUSA. 24. 1933

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Note to aff: 1. The recognition so granted to Postgraduate Course shallbe for a maximum period of 5 years , upon whichit shali have to be renewed.

(4) के अनुसरण में, मूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उद्यम मंत्रालय के नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :-

1. महात्मा गांधी ग्रामीण औद्योगीकरण संस्थान , मगनवाड़ी, वर्धा-442001 ( महाराष्ट्र) ।

2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub - clause-4 shall invariably resuit in stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course .

[No.U.12012/ 95 /2011 -ME (P.II ) ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy

2. शाखा कार्यालय , राष्ट्रीय लघु उद्योग निगम लिमिटेड, 105-106, होटल विराज बिल्डिंग , गुरुदेव कमर्शियल कॉम्प्लैक्स के सामने , सायली रोड, सिलवासा-396 230 (दादर एवं नागर हवेली संघ गणराज्य ) ।

मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय

( उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग )

3. शाखा कार्यालय , राष्ट्रीय लघु उद्योग निगम लिमिटेड, 104 , पहली मंजिल , मन्ना सूर्ती कॉम्प्लैक्स. डॉक्टर्स कॉलोनी , कंकरबाग , पटना -800 020 ( बिहार ) । (राजभाषा यूनिट )

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2011

4. राज्य कार्यालय, खादी और ग्रामोद्योग आयोग , पोस्ट- बी. वी. कॉलेज , शेखपुरा , पटना-800 014 ( बिहार ) ।

[सं. ई. 12016/01 /2005-हिन्दी] अमरेन्द्र सिन्हा , अपर सचिव

MINISTRY OF MICRO , SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES

New Delhi , the 3rd January, 2012 का.आ. 5. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनां के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम 4 के अनुसरण में , मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय ( उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) के अंतर्गत शिक्षुता प्रशिक्षण बोर्ड, ( उ. क्षे. ) , कानपुर को ऐसे कार्यालय के रूप में. जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।

[सं. 11011-1/2011 - रा.भा.ए. ] अनन्त कुमार सिंह, संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRTY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

S.O. 106. In pursuance of sub - rule ( 4) of Rule 10 ofthe Official Language ( Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices , under the control of the Ministry of Micro , Small & Medium Enterprises , whose more than 80% staff has acquired working knowledge in Hindi:-

(Department of Higher Education )

1. Mahatma Gandhi Institute for Rural Industrialisation , Maganwadi , Wardha-442001 (Maharashtra) .

(O.L. UNIT) New Delhi , the 30th December, 2011

2. Branch Office , National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. , 105-106, Hotel Viraj Building , Oppostite Gurudev Commercial Complex, Sayli Road, Silvassa- 396230 ( UT of Dadra & Nagar Haveli).

S.O. 105. In pursuance of sub -rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies Board of Apprenticeship Training, (N.R. ) Kanpur under theMinistry ofHuman Resource Development , ( Deptt . of Higher Education ) as office, whose more than 80% members of the staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .

3. Branch Office , National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. , 104, 1st Floor, Manna Surti Complex, Doctors Colony, Kankarbagh , Patna 800020(Bihar).

[No.11011-1 /2011 -O.L.U. ] ANANT KUMAR SINGH, Jt . Secy.

सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उद्यम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी , 2012

4. State Office , Khadi and Village Industries Commission, Post- B.V. College, Sheikhpura, Patna-800 014 (Bihar).

का.आ. 106.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय योज लिए पयागः ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम

[No. E- 12016/01 /2005-Hindi ] AMARENDRA SINHA , Addl . Secy.

269 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 107.-कंन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपार्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करना रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रोटैक वेइंग सिस्टम , नं. 9-6-439 , अनामिका कॉम्पलैक्स , ज्योति बैटरी के पास , गांधी गंज रोड , बिडार-595403 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यधार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एमटी- टीबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रोटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/366 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनलात्मक धारित , आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ), नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10*, या 5 ×10% , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 212 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 107. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied tha: the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) readwith sub- rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (TableTop type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " MT- TB " and with brand name "MICROTECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactred by M/ s Microteck Weighing System, No. 9-6-439, Anamica Complex, Near Jyoti Battery, Gandhi Ganj Road , Bidar - 585403 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 11/366;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 110 g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure-2Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. to 2 g. and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (212)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 271

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/ पौष 24, 1933

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 108.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यधार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स माइक्रोटैक वेइंग सिस्टम , नं. 9-6-439,अनामिका कॉम्प्लैक्स , ज्योति बैटरी के पास , गांधी गंज रोड , बिडार -595403 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एमटी- पीएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माइक्रोटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /367 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित , आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति-2 : मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 212 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक, विधिक मार, विज्ञान 272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 108. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub - rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of midium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " MT- PS " and with brand name "MICROTECH" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactredby M /s . Microtech Weighing System, No. 9-6-439 , Anamica Complex, Near Jyoti Battery, Gandhi Ganj Road , Bidar- 585403 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 / 11 /367;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automaice weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 4 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Display (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative curreent power supply.

Figure-1

Figure- 2Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) ofrule 8 of the Legal Motrology (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 5000 kg .with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e'value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a, positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (212)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 273 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 201 ।

का.आ. 109.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जय मार्केटिंग , बी -3 , प्रथम तल , सहजानन्द मार्केट , पनकोरनाका, अहमदाबाद -1 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग ! ) वाले " पी ए " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पीएलएएनईटी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/11/343 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसिपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता । ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित, आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति-2 मॉडल को मीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुडे हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मंक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापभान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 5× 10 , के हैं. जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 2 (196)-20111

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निविजन 2GI/12-2 274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/ PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 109. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of series " PA " and with brand name "PLANET" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M /s . Jay Marketing, B - 3 , 1st Floor, Shahjanand Market, Pankornaka , Ahmedabad - 1 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/11/343;

The said model is a Electro Megnetic Force Comperisation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument (TableTop type -EMFC based ) with a maximum capacity of 1kg. and minimum capacity of 1g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hertz alternative curreent power supply.

Figure- 1

NRATING

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Motrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50000 or more for ' e ' value of I mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or5x10k, where k is positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 196)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 275 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 110.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम ।। के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जय मार्केटिंग , बी-3 , प्रथम तल , सहजानन्द मार्केट , पनकोरनाका, अहमदाबाद -1 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- 11 ) वाले " पी बी"श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पीएलएएनईटी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 11 / 344 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित , आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करतां है ।

आकृति-1

STAMP

OTIGE SHOR SHALING

PLANET

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10 * , या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 196)/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2011

5.0. 110. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, austied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of gal MetrologyAct , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is kmaintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub- rule (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( lable Top Type) with digital indication of High accuracy (Accuracy class - II) of series " PB " and with brand name PLANET " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Jay Marketing , B - 3 , 1st Floor, Shahjanand Market. Pankornaka, Ahmedabad- 1 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 11 /344;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with aximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interva! ( e) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50fHertz alternative curreent power supply.

Figure- 1

SLAL WOLI STAMIE Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Scaling is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by as base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal .A typical Whats diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

ine instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board fic access to external calibration .

ather , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Motrology (Approval of Models) 20. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the straments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with Scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 100.000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50 mg. and with verification seale interval :

e of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k , where k is tttree whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same 2. with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 196)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 277 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ.111.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम ।। के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जय मार्केटिंग , बी-3 , प्रथम तल , सहजानन्द मार्केट , पनकोरनाका , अहमदाबाद-1 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पी एक्स " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पीएलएएनईटी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 345 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत-- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित , आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

OTHER SIL SEALING

PLATE

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टोप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5,000 कि. ग्रा.तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 196) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/ PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 111.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub -rul3 (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " PX" and with brand name " PLANET " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/ s . Jay Marketing, B- 3 , 1st Floor , Shahjanand Market , Pankornaka , Ahmedabad- 1 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/11 /345 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with amaximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative curreent power supply.

Figure- 1

OFFER SEM SHALING

A PLATE

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Motrology (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . and up to 5,000 kg.with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 ×10k 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 196)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 279

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ.112.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 की शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कास वेइंग इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 568 , उद्योग विहार , फेज- V , गुड़गांव , हरियाणा-122016 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एमडब्ल्यू- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कास " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/11 /323 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत् व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-।

आकृति-2- मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायग्राम।

स्केल की बाटम प्लेट में छेद बना कर, इन छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है। स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट जोड़ी जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध ड्याग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है।

गया है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी नियंत्रण है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन नियंत्रण को निष्क्रिय करने के लिए पीसीबी में डिप स्विच दिया और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या उससे अधिक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 % , 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 192 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 112. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 read with sub- rule (6) of Rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of Special Accuracy (Accuracy Class- I ) of Series " MW- II " and with brand name "CAS" manufactured by M/s. CAS Weighing India Pvt. Ltd. , 568, Udyog Vihar, Phase- V, Gurgaon , Haryana- 122016 which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 11/323;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 600 g and minimum capacity of 1 g. The veritication scale interval ( e ) is 10 mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model.

Thesealing is done through the holes, made in the bottom plate of the scale, than sealing wire is passed through these holes. Stamping plate is connected through the sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal to get the stamping. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided inside the PCB to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in excrcise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (9) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximnm capacity upto 5 kg with verification scale interval (n) for 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 192)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 281

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 113.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कास वेइंग इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 568 , उद्योग विहार , फेज- V , गुड़गांव , हरियाणा-122016 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सीएल -3000 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " कास" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /324 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

113 आकृति-2- मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायग्राम।

स्केल की बाटम प्लेट में छेद बना कर , इन छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है। स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग बायर निकाल कर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट जोड़ी जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गयाहै।

गया है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी नियंत्रणा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन नियंत्रण को निष्क्रिय करने के लिए डिप स्विच दिया और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 *, 5× 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 192 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2Gl /12-3 282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/ PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 113. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 read with sub- rule (6) of Rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " CL - 3000 " and with brand name "CAS" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M /s . CAS Weighing India Pvt . Ltd. , 568 , Udyog Vihar, Phase-V, Gurgaon , Haryana - 122016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 11/ 324;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model.

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by k. in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -rule (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. to 2 g . and with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 192)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legai Metrology 283 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 114.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डॉक्टर बेली राम एंड सन्स ( एमएफजी ) , 42 , डीएलएफ , कीर्ति नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , नई दिल्ली -110015 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग IIII ) वाले " केसीएस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मेकेनिकल स्प्रिंग बेलेंस हैंगिंग एवं डायल टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केआरयूपीएस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 321 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्प्रिंग सिद्धांत पर आधारित मेकेनिकल अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मेकेनिकल स्प्रिंग बेलेंस हैंगिंग एंड डायल टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 500 ग्रा. है । अंशाकन स्केल पर दिया गया प्वांटर मापमान को सूचित करता है।

आकृति-1

LEADSEAL

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों में से लीड और सील वायर लगाकर सील किया जा सकता है। कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 300 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 179 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 114. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal MetrologyAct, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub- rule (6) of rule 8 and sub- rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical spring balance hanging and dial type ) of ordinary accuracy (accuracy class - IIII ) of series "KCS " and with brand name " KRUPS" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Doctor Beli Ram & Sons (Mfg ),42, DLF, Kirti Nagar Industrial Area , New Delhi - 110015 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /321 ;

The said model is the principal of spring based non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical spring balance hanging and dial type) with a maximum capacity of 100 kg . and minimum capacity of5 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is500g. A pointer on the dial indicates the results of the measurement .

Figure- 1

Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instruments . Sealing shallbe done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 , the Central Governinent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 300 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 1,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10kor 5.10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 179)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 285 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर, 2011

का.आ. 115.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स डॉक्टर बेली राम एंड सन्स ( एचएफजी ) , 42 , डीएलएफ , कीर्ति नगर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , नई दिल्ली -110015 द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- IIII ) वाले " केएचएस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मेकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केआरयूपीएस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/322 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल स्प्रिंग सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मेकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन पूरक उच्चता ( हाइट ) मापक स्टैंड सहित ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 125 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 500 ग्रा. है । अंशाकन स्केल पर दिया गया प्वांटर मापमान को सूचित करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों में से लीड और सील वायर लगाकर सील किया जा सकता है। कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए मशीन कोखोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 150 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 110* , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (179 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 115. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub -rule(6) ofrule 8 and sub-rule (4 ) ofrule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical person weighing machine ) of ordinary accuracy ( accuracy class - IIII ) of series " KHS " and with brand name "KRUPS" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Doctor Beli Ram & Sons (Mfg) , 42, DLF, Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110015 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /322 ;

The said model is the principal of spring based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Mechanical person weighing machine with supplementary height measurement stand) with a maximum capacity of 125 kg and minimum capacity of 5 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 500 g. A pointer on the dial indicates the results of the measurement .

Figure- 1 Model

Figure-2Schematic diagram of the sealing provision ofthe model .

Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instruments. Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 150 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10,2 × 10 or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 179)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 287

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 116.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कृष्णा स्केल इंडिया , 194 , साथी रोड , इरोड-638003 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जे एस" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " भोमिक्स" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 278 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित , आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति- ।

PLATFORM

SEAL

REAR DIPLAY

TOP COMER

BOTTOM COVER

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 164)/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 116.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy (accuracy class - 11 ) of series " JS " and with brand name " BHOMIX " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Krishna Scale India, 194, Sathy Road, Erode- 638003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 11 /278

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

PLATFORM

SEAL

REAR DRIPLAY

TOP COVER

BOTTOM COVER

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for 'e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 164)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 289

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 117.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित भॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम ।। के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कृष्णा स्केल इंडिया , 194 साथी रोड , इरोड़-638003 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एमडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " भोमिक्स " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मांडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /279 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) कि.ग्रा. को लीटर में बदलने की सुविधा सहित - मिक व्हीयर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SEALING JA

REAR COVER

FRONT COWER

DISPLAY

0000 KEY PAD

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुडे हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोका दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि रक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमागपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन कं अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 164 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2G1/12--4 290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 117. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub- rule (6) ofrule 8 and sub - rule (4) ofrule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class -III ) of Series " MW " and with brand name " BHOMIX" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfacturedby M/ s . Krishna Scale India , 194, Sathy Road, Erode- 638003 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /279;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type-with kg. to litre conversion facility- Milk Weigher ) with a maximum capacity of 1000Kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

SEALING TAG

REAR COVER

FRONT COWER

DISPLAY

Bhomix

KEYPAD

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connectedby whole in base plate and top cover of display. than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 164)/ 2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 291 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 118.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, त्रिहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वेल्ट्रोनिक्स सिस्टम, 259/बी , नाहर एंड शेठ इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , एल बी एस मार्ग , भांडुप (डब्ल्यू) , मुंबई-400078 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू डब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " बेलट्रोनिक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /318 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति- 2 -मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2× 10 या 5x10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 153 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART 11 SEC . 3 ( ii ))

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 118. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act . 2009 ( i of2010 ) read with sub -rule (6) of Rule 8 and sub -rule (4) of Rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class -III) of Series " WWB " and with brand name " WELLTRONICS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Weltronics Systems , 259/B, Nahar and Sheth Industrial Estate , L.B.S. Marg , Bhandup (W) , Mumbai - 400078 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 11/318 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model.

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display The seal is connected by whole in base plate anti top cover of display than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with above 5tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10 or 5x10 *, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No.WM - 21 ( 153 ) 2011 .

B. N. DIXIT, Director of egel Metrologs 293 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/ पौष 24, 1933

भाग ।।- खल्ह (m)

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 119. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा राष्ट्रीय बाट और माप प्रयोगशाला , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा जारी मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र सहित उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई साकरि देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात को संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में गेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अत . , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप-नियम ( 6) और नियम ।। के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पाठेत विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 के दूसरे परंतुक द्वारा सांक्तयों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टोटल कंट्रोल सिस्टम, मुररै इक्विपमेंट , आई.एन.सी. , 2515 ए , चार्लेस्टन प्लेस , फोर्ट वेने , इडिन दूएसए 46808 द्वारः विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 0.3 % वाले " 700 " श्रृंखला के पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों के लिए मापन पद्धति अंजाम सूचन सहित , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम ' टीसीएस ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एन पेट्राटेक प्रा. लि. , पंजीकृत कार्यालय: 16 आविष्कार , महंत रोड , विले पार्ले ( ईस्ट ) , मुंबई -400057 द्वारा बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना ।कसी परिवर्तन के भारत में आयात किया गया और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13 / 11 / 178 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमान प्रमाण-पत्र जारो ओर प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल पर्यावरणीय दबाव पर भंडारित ता विस्कोसिटी ( < 20 pa.s ) के पानी के अलावा अन्य कार्यों हेतु एक रोटरी मीटर है । यह उपकरण -10°C से +50 °C तक दर की तापनान रेंज में कार्य करता है । तकनीकी ब्यौरे निम्नानुसार है:-

Flowrate range

Minimum measured quantity Size

Mocci Designation

Ormax L/min

Qmin L/min

226

38mra

1½"

380

TCS 700-15

50mm

550

S700-20

Somm

100

760

TUS 700-25

100

7.5mm

100

1155

FCS 700-30

100

50man

200

1893

151

TCS -00-35

100mm

200

2271

TCS 700-40

151

100mm

TCS 700-45

SUM WINE

आकृति-2-सीलिंग प्रावधान।

मॉडल को योजनाबद्ध सोलिंग करने का डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । मैकेनिकल डिस्पले के लिए, लॉक कॉलर और पेचों के उपयोग सभायाजक बैरल को बंद किया जाता है । इलेक्ट्रानिक डिस्पले के लिए, बाहरी अंशांकन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए उपकरण के मदर बोर्ड नं डिए स्तिच लगाया गया है आटामेशन को उद्देश्य से पला मीर को कम्प्यूटर , पी एल सी , माइक्रोप्रोसेसर , प्रिंटर आदि के साथ जोड़ा जाता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (38 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 119. Whereas the Central Govenment , after considering the report submitted to it along with the model approval certificate issued by the National Weights and Measures Laboratory, United Kingdom, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( lof2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and sub- rule ( 6) of Rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby approves , issues and publishes the certifi- cate of approval of model of Measuring Systems For Liquids Other Than Water with digital indication of accu- racy class 0.3 % ( hereinafter referred to as said model ) of series -'700 ' with brand name "TCS ", manufactured by M/s.Total Control Systems , A Division of Murray Equipment , Inc. , 2515 , Charleston USA 46808 and imported in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s. An Petrotech Pvt . Ltd. , Reg. Off.: 16, Aavishkar Mahant Road , Vile Parle ( East) , Mumbai -400 057 and which is assigned the approval mark ston Place , Fort Wayne , Indiana , IND/13/11/ 178 ; The said model is a Rotary Meter for the measurement of liquids other than water of low viscosity (<20mPa.s ) stored at atmospheric pressure . The instrument operates in the temperature range of -10 ° C to +50 °C. The technical details are as follow:

Size

Model Designation

Flowrate range

Minimum measured quantity

Qmin L/min

Qmax L/min

TCS 700-15

1½"

38mm

TCS700-20

226

50mm

TCS 700-25

380

50mm

TCS 700-30

550

75mm

100

TCS700-35

760

100

50mm

100

TCS700-40

1155

100

100mm

151

TCS 700-45

1893

200

100mm

151

2271

200

for volume display and 10 digit non- reset totalizer . The flow meter pulse output may be connected to either mechanical or electronic register device that has 9 digits

Figure- lModel

AN Wiet

Fig. -2- Sealing arrangement.

Aschematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above . For mechanical display, adjuster barrel is locked using locking collar and tightening screw. For electronic display, the instrument has dip switch in mother board to disable access to external calibration .

The flow meter can be interfaced with Computers , PLC, Microprocessor , Printer etc. for automation purposes .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (38 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 295

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 120.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा राष्ट्रीय बाट और माप प्रयोगशाला , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा जारी मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र सहित उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 के दूसरे परंतुक द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टोटल कंट्रोल सिस्टम , मुररै इक्विपमेंट , आईएनसी. , 2515 , चार्लेस्टन प्लेस , फोर्ट वेने , इंडियना यूएसए 46808 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 0.3 % वाले " 682 " श्रृंखला के पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों के लिए मापन पद्धति अंकक सुचन सहित , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम ' टीसीएस' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एन पेट्रोटैक प्रा. लि. , पंजीकृत कार्यालयः 16 , आविष्कार, महंत रोड, विले पार्ले ( ईस्ट ) , मुंबई -400057 द्वारा बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के भारत में आयात किया गया और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13 / 11 / 179 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल पर्यावरणीय दबाव पर भंडारित लो विस्कोसिटी ( <20 pas ) ) के पानी के अलावा अन्य कार्यों हेतु एक रोटरी मीटर है । यह उपकरण -10 ° C से + 50 °C तक दर की तापमान रेंज में कार्य करता है । तकनीकी ब्यौरे निम्नानुसार है ;

Flowrate range

Size

Minimum measured quantity Model Designation

Qmax L/min

Qmin L/min

187

38mm

1½"

TCS 682-15

फ्लो मीटर पल्स आउटपुट को मैकेनिकल अथवा इलैक्ट्रानिक रजिस्टर उपकरण के साथ जोड़ा जाए जिसमें वोल्यूम डिस्प्ले के लिए 9 डिजिट्स और 10 डिजिट्स नॉन- रिसेट टोटलाइजर है ।

आकृति - 1

00000

000000

CALIBRATION DIAL

AIR ELIMINATOR-

TCS

PRESET

STRAINER

VALVE

HETER-

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

मॉडल को योजनाबद्ध सीलिंग करने का डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । मैकेनिकल डिस्पले के लिए, लॉक कॉलर और पेचों के उपयोग से समायोजक बैरल को बंद किया जाता है । इलेक्ट्रानिक डिस्पले के लिए , बाहरी अंशांकन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए उपकरण के मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच लगाया गया है ।

आटोमेशन के उद्देश्य से फ्लो मीटर को कम्प्यूटर , पी एल सी, माइक्रोप्रोसेसर , प्रिंटर आदि के साथ जोड़ा जाता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 38 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/ PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii )]

New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2011

alongth the S.O. 120. Whereas the Central Govenment , after considering the repor submittea model approval certificate issuedby the National Weights and Measures Laboratory. United Kingdom, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisons of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2013 ) and the Legal Metrology Approval of Models ) Ru'es 201 i and the said model is likelyto maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to sender accurate serve under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and sub - rule ( 6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) of rule It of the legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby approves , issues and publishes the certifi- cate of approval of model of Measuring Systems For Liquids Other Than Water with digital indication of racy class 0.3 % ( hereinafterreferred to as said model ) of series -' 682 " with brand name " ICS mnufactured by M/s. Total Control Systems , A Division of Murray Equipment , Inc. , 2515. Charleston Place, Fort Wayne, Inonаrа. USA 46808 and imported in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . An Petrotech Pvt . Ltd. , Reg. Off.: 16 , Aavishkar Mahant Road. Vile Parle ( East ) , Mumbai - 400 057 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/13/11/179 ;

The said model is a Positive Displacement Meter for the measurement of liquids other than water of t viscosity (<20mPa.s) stored at atmospheric pressure . The instrument operates in the temperature range o ! -10 ° C to + 50 ° C . The technical details are :

Size

Flowrate range

Minimon Model Designation

measures quantity

Qmin L/min

Qmax imin

TCS 682-15

1½"

38mm

187

10 The flow meter pulse output is connected to either mechanical or clectronic register device that has 9 digits for volume display and 10 digit non - reset totalizer.

Figure- i Model

00000

0000000

Fig.2- Sealing arrangement.

Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above . For either mechanical or electronic display, the calibration dial is locked with a pin and seal wire . In addition , for electronic display, the instrument has dip switch in mother board to disable access to external calibration .

The flow meter can be interfaced with Computers , PLC, Microprocessor, Printer etc. for automation purposes .

ENWM- 21: 38 )-20111

B. N. DIXIT. Director of Legal Meiros gy 297

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 121.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एल एंड टी स्केल्ज, 10 , रामाकृष्णा नगर , बैंगो स्ट्रीट, कवुन्डम्पल्लयम , कोयम्बतूर-641030 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " एलजेटीएम " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन , सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडलु का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माटाटोया " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /226 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3000 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । ग्रा है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति

STAMPING PLATE

SEALING POINT

0568

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा . या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 132)/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2Gl/12-5 298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2011

S.O. 121. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the LegalMetrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of Special Accuracy (Accuracy class - 1 ) of series " LJTM " and with brand name " MATATTOYA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured by M/s L & T Scales , 10 , Ramakrishna Nagar , Bango Street , Kavundampalayam , Coimbatore - 641 030 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 11 /226;

The said model is a Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (TableTop Type) with a maximum capacity of 3000g. and minimum capacity of 1g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz, alternative current , power supply.

Figure-1

000

STAMPING PLATE

SEALING POINT

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe Model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 or more for ' e ' value of Img . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 ×10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 132 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 299 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 122.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टोयो टैक्नोलोजी, 6.10/63 जे . टुरैसामी नगर, पल्लापट्टी , सालेम -636009 तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " नैनो " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन , सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जेएजेडजेड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /308 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 320 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SEALINGPAN

Mancap.:600gMinCap.:200mgen10mgClass.ill

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाड़ी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुडे हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 124 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2011

S.O. 122.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -rule (6) ofrule 8 and sub -rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy class - II) of series " NANO " and with brand name " JAZZ " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured byM/ s. Toyo Technologies , 6.10/ 63J , Duraisamy Nagar , Pallapatti , Salem -636009, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/308;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 320g. and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current, power supply.

Figure- 1

SIALING PO

10mg Classifi

256009 Min Cap: 200mg

Figure -2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 or more for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer inaccordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 124)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 301 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 123. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टोयो टैक्नोलोजी , 6.10/63 जे. टुरैसामी नगर, पल्लापट्टी , सालेमे-636009 तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टोयो " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन , सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जेएजेडजेड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/309 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

APROMONTIVAS आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 ", के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 124)/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART 11 --SEC. 3 ( ii) )

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 123. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of theLegal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule ( 6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) ofrule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " TOYO" and with brand name "JAZZ" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured byM/s. Toyo Technologies , 6.10/63 J , Duraisamy Nagar, Pallapatti , Salem- 636009, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /309;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30g . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts, 50Hertz alternative current, power supply.

Figure- 1

zzvr

FINE

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 or value for ' e ' value of 100mg. to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 124)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 303

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 124.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप-नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टोयो टैक्नोलोजी , 6.10/63 जे. दुरैसामी नगर , एल्लापट्टी , सालेम -636009 तमिलनाडू द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एलएवीए " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन , सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जेएजेडजेड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 310 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति

124

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.गा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10* , 5x10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 124)/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)]

New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 124. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels ) Rules ,20 11 and the saidModel is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (6) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) ofrule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy class- III) of series " LAVA " and with brand name " JAZZ" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) manufactured byM/s. Toyo Technologies, 6.10/63 J, Duraisamy Nagar, Pallapatti , Salem- 636009 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/11/310 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200 g. It has atare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current, power supply.

Figure- 1

124

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram ofsealing provision oftheModel

Sealing is done on the display by passing, sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub-rule (9 ) ofrule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover theweighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10k or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 124)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 305 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 125.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप-नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री आदिनाथ स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज, 46 मारवाडी रोड , भोपाल-462001 मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसएएसटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन , सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइभ ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए.एस.आई. डीआईजीआई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /270 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आर्धयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

TOP BODY OF SCALE

SEAL WIRE

LEAD SQUARE

0000

SEAL

BOTTOM OF SCALE A.S.I. LIGI

SEAL WIRE

LEAD SQUARE SEAL

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 118 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2 CI/12-6 306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

=

S.O. 125. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules ,2011 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by section 22 ofthe Legal MetrologyAct, 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub- rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) ofrule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " SAST " and with brand name "A.S.I.DIGI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) manufactured by M/ s . Adinath Scale Industries, 46 , Marawari Road , Bhopal -462001 , Madhya Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 11 /270 ;

The saidModel is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts, 50Hertz alternative current, power supply.

Figure- 1

A.S.J. DIGI

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 or more for ' e ' value of 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 118 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 307 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 126. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप -नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री आदिनाथ स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , 46 मारवाडी रोड , भोपाल-462001 , मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसएएस- पीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए. एस. आई. डीआईजीआई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 271 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति ।

TOP OF INLESTOR

000

SFAL WIRE

LEAD SUKIANG

BOTTON OF

A.S.I. DIGI

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन केअनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 118)/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/ PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 126. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub -rule (6) of rule 8 and sub- rule (4) ofrule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " SAS - PF " and with brand name "A.S.I.DIGI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) manufacturedby M/s . Adinath Scale Industries , 46, Marawari Road, Bhopal-462001 , Madhya Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 11 / 271 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maxinium capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current , power supply.

Figure-1

TOP OF INDICETOR

Max 1000 Kg

Min 02 Kg

E 100 g

000

Class III

SEAL WIRE

BRAL

LEAD BOU S..DIGI

BOTTOM OF INDICATOR

Figure -2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of thc Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover theweighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 104,2× 10kor 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 118)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 309 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 127. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एल सी एस कंट्रोल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटड , प्लाट नं. 34 एंड 35 , पहली लिंक स्ट्रीट , नेहरू नगर , चेन्नई-600041 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग XIII , वाले " एडब्ल्यू- सीडब्ल्यूएस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित कैच वेइंग उपकरण ( चैक व्हीयर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एलसीएस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/11/218 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित कैच वेइंग उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है के साथ सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । ग्राफिक लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डिस्प्ले ( एल सी डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति

-40 through both pacers and med

Output Connecke Input Cormacior Pour Supply Connector

Louel Cell Oporniectur 5.Analog Output Part (NOT IN USE)

आकृति- 2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

स्पेशल स्क्रू पर दिए गए होल और बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर इस वायर के अंत में लीड सील लगाई गई है जैसा कि ऊपर स्कैच में दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन केअनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं, और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 % , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 109 )/2011 ] बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 127. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate ofapproval of the model ofAutomatic Catch Weighing Instrument ( Check Weigher) belonging to accuracy class XIII of AW- CWS series with brand mame " LCS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufacturedby M/ s . LCS Controls Private Limited, Plot No. 34 and 35, 1st Link Street , Nehru Nagar, Chennai - 600041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /218 ;

The said model is a shear beam type load cell based Automatic Catch Weighing Instrument . It has maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 250g with verivication scale interval ' e ' 5g . Graphic Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current, power supply .

Figure- 1Model

BaleThe Botted fame is through hole sorams andgrated,

Iopul Cormador

127

Power Supply Convector

Load Cell Conscio 5. Analog Output Port ( NOT IN USE

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of the sealing provision ofthe Model .

Asealing wire is passed through the body and hole provided at the special screw and a lead seal is applied at the end of this wire sketch as given below.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with capacity up to 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 109)/2011 ] B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 311

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 128.-- केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 की शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विश्वकर्मा ( ई एस ) इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , विश्वकर्मा नगर , पी ओ सरदाना , अजमेर -305206 राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग X( 1 ) , वाले " एसवीएचडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सीएचओवाईएएल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /316 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा . और कम स्केल अंतराल ( डी) वेल्यू20 ग्रा. जो उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकार पर आधारित फिलरेट 10 फिल्स प्रति मिनट की बारम्बारता सहित है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारः विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति

STAMPING FA आकृति- 2 -मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायग्राम।

साफ्टवेयर केलिब्रेशन को सुरक्षित रखने के लिए उपकरण को सीलबंद करने के लिए एक पासवर्ड प्रदान किया गया है । मशीन के अगले पैनल पर सत्यापन मुहर फिक्स की जाएगी और उसे सिंगल तार से सीलबंद किया जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अलावा मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 82) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the, 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 128. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub -rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) ofrule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of automatic gravimetric filling instrument belonging to accuracy class X ( I ) , Series " SVHW " and with brand name " CHOY AL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) manufactured by M /s . Shri Vishvakarma ( E.S. ) Industries Pvt . Ltd. , Vishvakarma Nagar, P.O. , Sardana, Ajmer- 305206, Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/316;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling instrument . It has Maximum capacity of 200 kg. and least scale interval (d ) value of 20 g . with a frequency of 10 fills per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product . The instrument operates on 230 Volts power supply.

Figure-1

000

Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the Model .

To seal the instrument a password is provided to protect the software calibration . Verification stamp will be fixed on the front panel of the machine and sealed by single wire . In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall be done to prevent the opening or machine for fraudulent practices .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 82)/20111

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 313 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर, 2011

का.आ. 129.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 की शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विश्वकर्मा ( ई एस ) इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. , विश्वकर्मा नगर , पी ओ सरदाना , अजमेर -305206 राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग X( 1 ) , वाले " एसवीएच " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सीएचओवाईएएल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/ 317 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और कम स्केल अंतराल ( डी ) वेल्यू 5 ग्रा. जो उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकार पर आधारित फिलेरेट 10 फिल्स प्रति मिनट की बारम्बारता सहित है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति

CHOYAL

882889

आकृति-2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

साफ्टवेयर केलिब्रेशन को सुरक्षित रखने के लिए उपकरण को सीलबंद करने के लिए एक पासवर्ड प्रदान किया गया है । मशीन के अगले पैनल पर सत्यापन मुहर फिक्स की जाएगी और उसे सिंगल तार से सीलबंद किया जाएगा । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अलावा मशीन कोकपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (82)/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2G1/12-7 314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 129. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) ofrule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate ofapproval ofthe Model ofautomatic gravimetric filling instrument belonging to accuracy class X ( I ), Series " SVH" and with brand name " CHOY AL" (hereinafter referred to as the saidModel ) manufacturedby M / s. Shri Vishvakarma ( E.S. ) Industries Pvt. Ltd. , Vishvakarma Nagar, P.O. , Sardana ,Ajmer - 305206 , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/ 317 ;

Thesaid Model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling instrument. It has maximum capacity of30 kg. and least scale interval ( d) value of 5 g . with a frequency of 10 fills per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current, power supply.

Figure- 1

CHCYAL

882980

000

Figure-2-Sealing Diagram of sealing provision of the Model .

To seal the instrument a password is provided to protect the software calibration . Verification s on the front panel of the machine and sealed by single wire . In addition to sealing the stamping plate, seag shall be done will be fixed to prevent the opening of machine for fraudulent practices.

[ F. No.WM - 21 ( 82)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 315 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012 /पौष 24 , 1933

भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 130.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तमॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 कं उप-नियम ( 4) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का ! ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स निकरोम इंडिया लिमिटेड, स्फायर पार्क गलेरिया, 4 , पुणे- मुंबई रोड, शिवाजी नगर , पुणे -411005 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , रेफ X ( 1 ) वाले " ईडब्ल्यूएफ " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविभेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " निकरोहोम " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 294 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( लिनियर व्हीयर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5000 ग्रा. और सबसे कम स्केल अंतराल ' डी ' वेल्यू । ग्रा . जो उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकार पर आधारित फिलरेट 20 फिल्स प्रति मिनट की बारम्बारता सहित है । मशीन को फ्री फ्लोइंग , नॉन स्टिकी , नॉन डस्टी उत्पाद जैसे चाय, चावल , गेहूं, पशुचारा , दालें आदि भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज ए सी प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

SEA

UMK

आकृति-2 मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायाग्राम

स्टाम्पिंग सील के सत्यापन के लिए , इंडीकेटर के लोअर पार्ट और अपर पार्ट में दो छेद करके , इन छेदों में से लीडिड वायर कसा जाता है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इसे कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए प्रयोग नहीं किया जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । मदरबोर्ड में डिप स्विच की व्यवस्था है और केलिब्रेशन/सत्यापन के बाद कपटपूर्ण कार्य प्रणालियों को रोकने के लिए डिप स्विच को असक्षम बनाया जाता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (166)/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2011

S.O. 130. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity withthe provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 (1 of2010) read with sub - rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument belonging to accuracy class . X( 1 ), Series "EWF " and with brand name " NICHROME" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Nichrome India Limited, Safire Park Galleria , 4, Pune - Mumbai Road, Shivaji Nagar, Pune -411 005 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 / 294;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument ( Linear Weigher) . It has maximum capacity of 5000 g . and least scale interval- ( d ) value of 1 g . with a frequency of 20 fillls per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product. The machine is designed for filling all types of free flowing , non- sticky, non - dusty products like tea, rice, wheat, cattle feed, pulses etc. Liquid Crystal display ( LCD) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hz AC power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2 Sealing Diagram of the sealing provision of the model .

The sealing of the instrument is done by making two holes from the lower part and upper part ofthe indicator and fastened the leaded wire through these holes and for receiving the verification stamping seal . It cannot be used for fraudulent practices until unless the seal is tempered. A tyical schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model is given above. There is provision for dip switch in the motherboard and after calibration /verification the dip switch is disabled to prevent fraudulent practices .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 166 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 317 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर, 2011

का.आ. 131.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स निकरोम इंडिया लिमिटेड, स्फायर पार्क गलेरिया , 4 , पुणे - मुंबई रोड, शिवाजी नगर , पुणे-411005 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , रेफ X( 1 ) वाले " एनएचएमडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " निकरोहोम " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 295 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( मल्टी- हैड-व्हीयर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. और सबसे कम स्केल अंतराल ' डी ' वेल्यू 0.1 ग्रा. जो उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकार पर आधारित फिलरेट 80 फिल्स प्रति मिनट की बारम्बारता सहित है । मशीन को फ्री फ्लोइंग , नॉन स्टिकी , नॉन डस्टी उत्पाद जैसे चिप्स, चाय , चावल , गेहूं, पशुचारा , दालें आदि भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज ए सी प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

וגן आकृति -2 मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायाग्राम

स्टाम्पिग सील के सत्यापन के लिए , इंडीकेटर के लोअर पार्ट और अपर पार्ट में दो छेद करके , इन छेदों में से लीडिड वायर कसा जाता है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इसे कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए प्रयोग नहीं किया जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । मदरबोर्ड में डिप स्विच की व्यवस्था है और केलिब्रेशन /सत्यापन के बाद कपटपूर्ण कार्य प्रणालियों को रोकने के लिए डिप स्विच को असक्षम बनाया जाता है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 166)/2011 ]

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 131. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (1 of2010) read with sub- rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument belonging to accuracy class . X( 1 ), Series " NHMW " and with brand name " NICHROME" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Nichrome India Limited, Safire Park Galleria , 4, Pune - Mumbai Road, Shivaji Nagar, Pune -411 005 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 / 295;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument ( Multi - Head- Weigher) . It has maximum capacity of 500 g . and least scale interval- (d ) value of 0.1 g. with a frequency of 80 fillls per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product. The machine is designed for filling all types of free flowing, non - sticky, non - dusty products like chips , tea, rice, wheat, cattle feed, pulses etc. Liquid Crystal display (LCD) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hz AC power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

INDICATOR

Figure-2 Sealing Diagram of the sealing provision ofthe model .

The sealing of the instrument is done by making two holes from the lower part and upper part of the indicator and fastened the leaded wire through these holes and for receiving the verification stamping seal . It cannot be used for fraudulent practices until unless the seal is tempered. A tyical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above. There is provision for dip switch in the motherboard and after calibration /verification the dip switch is disabled to prevent fraudulent practices .

[ F.No. WM-21 ( 166)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 319

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 132.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स स्मार्ट टैक्नोलोजी सिस्टम्स , नं. 31 , पांचवा क्रॉस , एम ई एस रोड , श्रर्दाम्बा रोड , जलहाली , बंगलूर -560013 कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित " एसटीएस300 एन ' श्रृंखला के इलेक्ट्रोनिक अंकक सूचन और प्रिंटिंग सुविधा सहित " टैक्सीमीटर " के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्मार्ट मीटर्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /338 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल मापन उपकरण है जो लगातार योग करता जाता है और यात्री द्वारा देय भाड़े को यात्रा के दौरान किसी भी समय दर्शाता है । सार्वजनिक वाहन ' ( टैक्सी या आटो रिक्शा ) के यात्रियों द्वारा देय भाड़ा , तय की गई दूरी और निर्धारित स्पीड से कम पर व्यतीत किए गए समय का फलन है जो प्राधिकृत शुल्क के अनुसार अनुपूरक भाड़े से स्वतंत्र है । मीटर की रीडिंग लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) द्वारा दर्शायी जाती है । टैक्सी मीटर का ' के ' फेक्टर 1274 प्लसेस प्रति किलोमीटर है । इंडीकेटर में किराया सूचन के लिए 5 अंक दो डेसीमल प्वाइंट सहित रुपए में, कि.मी. में अधिकतम दूरी दर्शाने के लिए 4 अंक एक डेसीमल प्वाइंट सहित और 6 अंक ( 2 अंक प्रत्येक घंटा, मिनट और सैकेंड के लिए ) समय दर्शाने के लिए है ।

आकृति - 1

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM FOR SEALING ARRANGEMENT

FrontView

Dispinyand touch panel switches

FORHIRE

Hrn L

SEAL WIRE

→SEAL LEAD

आकृति -2 मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायग्राम

सील और स्टाम्प के सत्यापन के लिए दिए गए दो होल्ज स्क्रू सहित में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर मीटर की फ्रंट बाटम साइड में सील की जाती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना टैक्सी मीटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता । इसके अतिरिक्त , मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 189 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 23rd September, 2011

S.O. 132 .--Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the inodel of " Taximeter" with electronic digital indication and printing facility ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) of series " STS300N " , brand name " Smart Meters" manufactured by M/ s . Smart Technology Systems , No. 31 , 5th Cross , MES Road, Sharadamba Road , Jalahalli , Bangalore - 560013 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/338;

The said model is a measuring instrument which totalizes continuously and indicates at any moment of journey, the charges payable by the passenger of a public vehicle (Taxi or auto- rickshaw) as function of the distance traveled and below a certain speed , of the length of time occupied , independent of supplementary charges according to the authorized tariffs . The reading of the meter is indicated by the Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) . The constant ' k ' of the Taxi Meter is 1274 impulses per indicated kilometer. The indicator has five digits with two after decimal point for fare indication in Rupees , four digists with one after decimal point for distance indication in kilometre and six digits (two digits each for hour , minute and second) for time indication .

Figure- 1 (Photograph ofModel)

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM FOR SEALING ARRANGEMENT

FrontView

Display and louch panel switches

FORHIRE

SCAL WIL

SEAL LEAD

Figure- 2: Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

For sealing the instrument , on the front bottom side of the taximeter two hole bearing screws are provided through which the sealing wire will pass for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The taximeter cannot be opened without tampering the seal . In addition , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of machine for fraudulent practices . A schematic diagram of sealing provision of the said model is given above .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 189)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 321 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 133.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेरिट टेक्नोलॉजी इंडिया लि. , नं. 152 , डिफेंस कालोनी , एकट्टुतंगल , चेन्नई-600032 तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , X ( 1 ) वाले " आरएलएस -2020 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( रेपिड लोडिंग सिस्टम ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेरिट " है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/342 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( रेपिड लोडिंग सिस्टम ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 72000 कि.ग्रा. और ' डी' वेल्यू 20 ग्रा. के साथ उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकृति पर निर्भर करते हुए इसकी बारम्बारता 65 फिल्स या डिस्चार्ज प्रति घंटा है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण की सीलिंग के लिए मदर बोर्ड पर डिप स्विच देकर उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन सुविधा दी गई है जो सील को बिना तोड़े अथवा छेड़खानी किए बिना केलीब्रेशन तक नहीं पहुंच सकती है । इंडीकेटर की पिछली तरफ से दो कोण वाले एक दूसरे के विपरीत दो छेद अपर कवर और तल प्लेट काट कर बनाए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सीलिंग प्राप्त करने के लिए इन छेदों को लीड वायर से कसा गया है । इंडीकेटर को सील से छेडछाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । स्टांपिंग प्लेट की सीलिंग के अलावा कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाएगी ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 184 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2 G1/12-8 322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II---SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the23rd September , 2011

S.O. 133. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument ( rapid loading system ) belonging to accuracy class X ( 1 ) , series " RLS - 2020 " and with brand name " Merit " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Merit Technologies India Ltd. , No. 152, Defence Colony, Ekkattuthangal , Chennai - 600032 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/11 / 342;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument ( rapid loading system) . It has maximum capacity of 72000 kg . and least scale interval ( d) value of 20g. with a frequency of 65 fillls or discharge per hour depending upon the quantity and nature of the product . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hz . power supply.

Figure- 1Model

이

10 Figure- 2 Sealing Diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Forsealing the instrument has external calibration facility through dip switch provided on mother board which is not accessible for calibration without breaking or tempering of seal . From the rear side of indicator two diagonally opposite holes are made by cutting the upper cover and base plate and fastence by lead wire through these holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator cannot be opened without tampering the seal . In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall be done to prevent the opening of machine for fraudulent practices .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with weighing capacity above 10 tonnes to 200 tonnes and with maximum frequency up to 65 fills or discharges per hour manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 184)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 323 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II-- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 134.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपार्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम ।। के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स निशा टैक्नोलोजी # 153 , शंकर नगर मैन रोड ( सिंडीकेट बैंक के पास ) नंदिनी लेआऊट , बंगलोर-560096 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) वाले " जेएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम "वीईएनआईसीई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 375 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

SEALING POINT

आकृति-2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्तदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 224 )/2011 ]

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 134. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub- rule (6 ) of Rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy class II ) of series " JS" and with brand name " VENICE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s. Nisha Technologies, # 153, Shankar Nagar MainRoad (Near Syndicate Bank), Nandini Layout, Bangalore - 560096 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/375;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

SLAI ING POINT Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) ofRule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (224)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 325 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 135.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स निशा टैक्नोलोजी , #153 , शंकर नगर मैन रोड ( सिंडीकेट बैंक के पास ) नंदिनी लेआऊट , बैंगलोर-560096 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " टीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वीईएनआईसीई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /376 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत-प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - ।

SEALING POINT आकृति- 2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10% , 5 × 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 224 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 135. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule (6 ) of Rule 8 and sub - rule ( 4) of Rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class- III ) of series "TI " and with brand name "VENICE" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M /s . Nisha Technologies , # 153 , Shankar Nagar MainRoad (Near Syndicate Bank) , Nandini Layout, Bangalore - 560 096 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/11/376 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with amaximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-!

SEALING POINT Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 (224 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 327

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 136.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम ।। के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स निशा टैक्नोलोजी # 153 , शंकर नगर मैन रोड ( सिंडीकेट बैंक के पास ) नंदिनी लेआऊट , बंगलोर-560096 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " पीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वीईएनआईसीई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/377 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - ।

आकृति- 2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों ... प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत; डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 224 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 136. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III) of series " PF " and with brand name " VENICE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M / s . Nisha Technologies , # 153 , Shankar Nagar Main Road (Near Syndicate Bank) , Nandini Layout, Bangalore -560096 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/11/377;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg . and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

The instrument has external control to calibration .A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 ×10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM-21 ( 224)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 329 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012 /पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2011

का.आ. 137. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप -नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओहॉस कोरपोरेशन , 19ए, चैपिन रोड , पी ओ बाक्स 2033 , पिने ब्रुक , एनजे 07058-2033 , यूएसए द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) के " एक्सपलोर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओहॉस " है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ओहॉस वेइंग इंडिया प्रा. लि. , अमर हिल , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई -400072 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व या पश्चात् बिना किसी परिवर्तन के बिक्रीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 / 372 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

WireSeal

(৯)

आकृति- 2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम (9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता दाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 % , 2x10 या 5x10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 221 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2Gl/12-9 330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 / PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 137. Whereas the Central Governinent , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type) with digital indication of special accuracy (accuracy class - I) of series " EXPLORER " andwith brand name "OHAUS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/ s . Ohaus Corporation, 19A , Chapin Road. P.O. Box 2033 , Pine Brook , NJ 07058-2033 , USA and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s. Ohaus Weighing India Private Limited , Amar Hill, Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai -400072 which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 11 /372 ;

The said model is electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument ('Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 220g . and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The color graphic liquid crystal diode ( LCD) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above . The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also coverthe weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50000 or more and with ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 221 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 331 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग 1] - खण्ड 3 ( ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 138.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओहॉस कोरपोरेशन , 19 ए, चैपिन रोड, पी ओ बाक्स 2033 , पिने बुक, एनजे 07058-2033 , यूएसए द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) के " एक्सपलोर्र " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओहॉस " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ओहॉस वेइंग इंडिया प्रा. लि. , अमर हिल , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व या पश्चात् बिना किसी परिवर्तन के बिक्रीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /373 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 420 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसोडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति -!

Wire

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 221 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 138.--Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 (1 of2010) read with sub - rule ( 6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " EXPLORER " and with brand name "OHAUS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M /s . Ohaus Corporation , 19A , Chapin Road, P.O. Box 2033, Pine Brook, NJ 07058-2033 , USA and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s. Ohaus Weighing India Private Limited, Amar Hill , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai - 400072 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /373 ;

The said model is electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 420g. and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The color graphic liquid crystal diplay (LCD) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1Model

Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A calibration switch has also been provided in A/D card /mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- rule (9) ofrule 8 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 221 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology

f 333 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 139.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओहॉस कोरपोरेशन , 19 ए, चैपिन रोड , पी ओ बाक्स 2033 , पिने ब्रुक, एनजे 07058-2033 , यूएसए द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) के " एसपीजे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओहॉस " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ओहॉस वेइंग इंडिया प्रा. लि. , अमर हिल, साकी विहार रोड, पोवई , मुंबई -400072 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व या पश्चात् बिना किसी परिवर्तन के बिक्रीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 374 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 ग्रा. ( 300 कैरेट ) और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 मि.ग्रा. (0.1 कैरेट ) है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 मि.ग्रा. ( 0.005 कैरेट ) है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (221 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 139. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " SPJ " and with brand name " OHAUS " (hereinafter referred to as the said mode! ) , manufactured by M/s . Ohaus Corporation , 19A, Chapin Road, P.O. Box 2033 , Pine Brook, NJ 07058-2033 , USA and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Ohaus Weighing India Private Limited, Amar Hill , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai - 400072 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /374;

The said model is a strain gauge type load celi based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with amaximum capacity of 60g (300 carat) and minimum capacity of 20mg (0.1 carat ) . The verification scale interval ( e) is Img (0.005 carat) . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal display ( LCD) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

The instrument has external control to calibration. A calibration switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this.certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 100000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 221 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 335

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 140.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप-नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 की शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लि. ,3-23-14 , हिगाशी , इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा-कु , टोक्यो-1700013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " ईके -वी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ए एंड डी" है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट्रूमेंटस इंडिया ( प्रा. ) लि. , 509 , उद्योग विहार, फेज- V , गुडगांव , हरियाणा -122016 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के बिक्रीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/353 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 0.1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

Seal

आकृति-2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे । 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 206) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक मात्र विज्ञान 336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 140. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (1 of2010) read with sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules, 2011, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) of series " EK- V " and with brand name "A & D" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14, Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima- Ku , Tokyo - 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s. A & D Instruments India ( P) Limited, 509 , Udyog Vihar, Phase - V, Gurgaon , Haryana- 122016 which is assigned the approvalmark IND/09/ 11/353;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 6100g and minimum capacity of 5g . The verification scale interval (e) is 0.1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Seal

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the modei

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A calibration switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100000 for ' e' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of5000 to 100000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 206 )/2011 ] B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 337 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 141.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तु मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए स्खेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अत्तः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम ४ के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 केउप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 की प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लि. , 3-23-14, हिगाशी , इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु, टोक्यो-1700013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) वाले " एफ एक्स " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ए एंड डी" है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट्रूमेंटस इंडिया (प्रा ) लि. 509 , उद्योग विहार, फेज- V, गुडगांव , हरियाणा-122016 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के. बिक्रीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 /354 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) फोर्स रिस्टोरेशन के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3200 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 मि.ग्रा. ' डी' वेल्यू 10 मि.ग्रा. सहित है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । बेक्यूम फ्लोरेसेंट डिस्प्ले ( वीएफडी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य बसता है ।

आकृति -1

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग कायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उर्परोक्तदिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10*, 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 206)/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2GI/12-10 338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 141. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub - rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) of series " FX " and with brand name " A & D " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M /s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14 , Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - Ku, Tokyo - 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . A & D Instruments India (P) Limited, 509, Udyog Vihar, Phase- V, Gurgaon, Haryana- 122016 which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 11 / 354;

The said model (Table Top Type ) is working on the principle of force restoration with a maximum capacity of 3200g and minimum capacity of 5g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100 mg with its ' d' value of 10 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Vacuum Fluorescent Display ( VFD ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the mou .. given above .

The instrument has external control to calibraticalibration switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of5000 to 100,000 for 'e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equa ! to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (206 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 339 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग 11 -- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 142. केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 (2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स यूनिवर्सल मार्केटिंग , एच नं. 14 , एमआईजी -11 , मुशक महल रेजिडेंसियल कम्पलैक्स , अट्टापुर , हैदराबाद -500064 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसडब्ल्यूपीसी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " समार्ट वे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डो/09/ 11 /371 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप - प्राइस कम्पुटिंग एंड पीस कटिंग सुविधा ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभात्र है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Stampyphih

400

BiwotWeigh

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10th, 5x10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (223 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 142. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) of rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) of series " SWPC " and with brand name " SMART WEIGH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Universal Marketing, H. No. 14, MIG - II , Mushk Mahal Residential Complex, Attapur, Hyderabad- 500064 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/371 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type-price computing and piece counting facility) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Smtingpind

Stampingshah

400

SmartWeigh

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision ofthe model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The stakis connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card /mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 ×10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM-21 (223 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 341 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 143. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम ।। के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स लेथी वे- ट्रिक्स , 40 , प्रेम प्रयाग कालोनी , गढ़ रोड , मेरठ-250004 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एलडब्ल्यूटी/डब्ल्यूबी-50 टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एसईएएल " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 11 / 355 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत-प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । एलईडी/एलसीडी तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

8.8.

STAMPING SIB SEALING

000000 SEAL

OTTER SIDE SCALING

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कघर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2× 10 * या 5× 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 161 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October , 2011

S.O. 143. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " LWT/WB - 50T " and with brand name " SEAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Lathey Weigh- Trix, 40, Prem Prayag Colony, Garh Road, Merrut-250004, Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /355;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . LED / LCD display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Model

50000 SEAL

PEIGH - THIX

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip'switch has also been provided in A/ D card mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models Rules, 2011. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with re value of 1-102-10 or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

| F. No. WM - 21 ( 161 )/ 2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT. Director of Legal Metrology 343

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भा[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2011

का.आ. 144.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स लेथी वे- ट्रिक्स , 40 , प्रेम प्रयाग कालोनी , गढ़ रोड, मेरठ-250004 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूटी/सीके-30टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( कनवर्सन किट के लिए इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एसईएएल " है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /356 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( कनवर्सन किट के लिए इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । एलईडी/एलसीडी तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MING SH SHATING

000000 SEAL

Tape Weron

THER SUME SEALING

आकृति-2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 150 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 % , 5x10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 161 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 144. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub - rule ( 6 ) of Rule 8 and sub - rule ( 4 ) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Model) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion Kit for Electronic Weighbridge ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy, class - III ) of series " LWT /CK- 30T " and with brand name " SEAL" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Lathey Weigh - Trix, 40 , Prem Prayag Colony, Garh Road, Merrut - 250004 , Uttar Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /356;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Conversion Kit for Electronic Weighbridge) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . LED/LCD display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

LOVT OK S

Max 20 000 ку

ALAMING SITE SEALING

000000 SEAL

OTHER SIDE SEALING

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with above 5 tonne and up to 150 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM-21 ( 161)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 345

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 145.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सनसंग इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स, फ्लेट नं. 17 , भैरवनाथ नगर अपार्टमेंट , बिल्डिग - डी नई एस.नं. 13 /2 बी/ 1 , पीएल-1 /कटराज , सुखसागर टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज के पास , पुणे-411046 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एसएजे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सनसंग " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /349 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

300mm

240mm

120mm

OTHER SIDA SEALING

330mm

SANSUNG

SUAL WITHI

STAMPING PLAI

आकृति-2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5× 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (205 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2GI/12-11 346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 145. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub - rule ( 6 ) of Rule 8 and sub- rule (4) of Rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy class- 11 ) of series " SAJ " and with brand name " SANSUNG " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Sansung Electronics , Flat No. 17, Bhairavnath Nagar Apartment, Building- D New S. No. 13 /2B / 1 , PL - 1 / Katraj , Near Sukhsagar Telephone Exchange , Pune- 411046 andwhich is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 11 /349 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

-300mm

120mm

240mm

330mm

OTHER SMA SEALING, SANSUNG

SEAL WITH TAMPING PLAT

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 (205 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 347 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 146.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सनसंग इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स, फ्लेट नं. 17 , भैरवनाथ नगर अपार्टमेंट , बिल्डिग- डी नई एस. नं. 13/ 2 बी/ 1 , पीएल. 1 /कटराज , सुखसागर टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज के पास, पुणे-411046 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसएटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सनसंग " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 11 / 350 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - ।

MANG

STAMPONUFLATR STON SEALING FLAT

LOAD SEAR

888888

OFF

SON

ON- OFF

TARE.

ZERO,

146

SIDR SLALING

83486

आकृति- 2 - मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 205 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 146. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) readwith sub- rule (6) of rule 8 and sub- rule (4) of rule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " SAT" and with brand name " SANSUNG " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Sansung Electronics , Flat No. 17, Bhairavnath Nagar Apartment, Building- D New S. No. 13 /2B/ 1 , PL- 1 / Katraj , Near Sukhsagar Telephone Exchange , Pune-411046 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /350;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Model

MANS

STAMPOKIPLAT STOR SEALING

LOAD SEAL SANSUNG

ON OFF

888888

ON-OFF

TARE

ZERO.

146

'R SIDE SEALING

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - rule (9) of rule 8 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No.WM- 21 (205)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 349 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 147. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम (6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सनसंग इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , फ्लेट नं. 17 , भैरवनाथ नगर अर्पाटमेंट, बिल्डिंग-डी नई एस. नं. 13/2 बी/1 , पीएल . 1/कटराज , सुखसागर टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज के पास , पुणे-411046 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसएपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सनसंग " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /351 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

OTHER SIDE SEALING

BAL WITH TAMPINGPLATE

600

PLATN

83481

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 205 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) )

New Delhi, the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 147. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub- rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " SAP " and with brand name " SANSUNG " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sansung Electronics , Flat No. 17, Bhairavnath Nagar Apartment, Building- D New S. No. 13 /2B / 1 , PL - 1 / Katraj , Near Sukhsagar Telephone Exchange , Pune-411046 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /351;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

OTHER SIDE SEALING

BAL WITH TAMPING PLATE

600

PLA

63481

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity from 50 kg . and up to 5000 kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for' e ' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (205)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 351

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 148. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. अमर हिल्स, एस. वी . रोड, पोवई, मुंबई-400072 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , X ( x) जहां x = 1 वाले " डीएफएस " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( ड्रम फिलिंग सिस्टम ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मैटलर टोलेडो" है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /359 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण ( ड्रम फिलिंग सिस्टम ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और ' डी ' वेल्यू 100 ग्रा. के साथ उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकृति पर निर्भर करते हुए इसकी बारम्बारता 20 फिल्स प्रति मिनट है । मशीन को सभी प्रकार विसकॉस/नॉन-विसकॉस लिक्विड, केमिकल्स , पेंट , आयल आदि के भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है वेक्यूम फ्लारेंस डिस्पले ( वी एफ डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के रियर साइड में कवर और ब्रेकिट में दो बोरेड स्क्रू करके, इन छेदों मे से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर कसा जाता है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इसे कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए प्रयोग नहीं किया जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. से 3000 कि.ग्रा. तक की होगी ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 210 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिकप विज्ञान 352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 148. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) readwith sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic gravimetric filling instrument ( drum filling system ) belonging to accuracy class . X(x) where x= l of series " DFS " and with brand name "METTLER - TOLEDO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s Mettler-Toledo India Private Limited, Amar Hill , S. V. Road, Powai , Mumbai -400072 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 11 / 359;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filling instrument ( drum filling system) . It has maximum capacity of 1000kg. and d value of 100g . with a frequency of 20 fills per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product . The machine is designed for filling all types of viscous/non - viscous liquids , chemicals , Paints, oils etc. Vacuum florescent display ( VFD ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model

On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

[ F. No. WM-21 (210)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 353 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 149.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सूर्या उदय इंजीनियर्स , ए-5 , वेद भवन , पारिक स्कूल के समाने , जोटवारा रोड, जयपुर , राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसडब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सूर्या डीजी " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /357 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति- 1

Head hole screw

Lead seal

Head hole screw

[Indicator of the Weighbridge Front Side)

Leadseal

Sealingwire

(Indicator of the Weighbridge-Lower back Side)

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में स्ने सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2× 10*, 5× 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 120 )/2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2Gl/12-12 354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 149. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub- rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4 ) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class- III) of series " SWB " and with brand name " SURYA DIGI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Surya Uday Engineers , A -5 , Vaid Bhawan , Opp . Pareek School , Jhotwara Road , Jaipur , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /11/357;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based not bhutomatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg. The verification scale interval (e) is Skg. It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) /display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Herd hole screw

a seal

Head hole screw

(Indicator ofthe Weighbridge- Front Side)

000

Lead seal

Scaling wire

edikator of theWeighbridge Lower back Side) Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal , is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules. 2011. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole nuinber or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 120)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 355 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/ पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 150.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् येह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णिप्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप -नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जे पी टैक्नोलोजी , ब्लॉक नं. 21/355 , रघुवीर अपार्टमेंट, पंचदेव मंदिर के पास, अरबुदा नगर बस स्टाप के पास, ओधव , अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " जेप्रीटी- टीटी-2" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का माम " श्री " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/11 /392 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रलय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

TOP BODY OF SCALE

SLAL WIR

LUAR SQUARE

0000

BOTTOM OF SCALE

SLAL WIRE-

LEAD SQUARE SEAL

आकृति-2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डामम्रप्रेम

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वावर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने की उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) संहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 181 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II- SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 150.--Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) readwith sub -rule (6) of rule 8 and sub- rule ( 4) ofrule 11 ofthe Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy class - 11 ) of series " JPT- TT- 2 " and with brand name " SHREE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s . J. P. Technology, Block No. 21/355 , Raghuvir Apartment , Near Panchdev Mandir, Near Arbuda Nagar Bus Stop , Odhav , Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /392;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

TOP BODY OF SCALE

Si -At Wil

0000

LADE QUAL A

SAL WIRE..

BOTTOM OF SCAL

LEAD SQUARE SEAL

Figure-2- Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5x10 " , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 181 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Lega ! Metrology 357

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2011

का.आ. 151. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सँवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जे पी टैक्नोलोजी , ब्लॉक नं. 21/355 रघुवीर अपार्टमेंट , पंचदेव मंदिर के पास , अरबुदा नगर बस स्टाप के पास , ओधव , अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जेपीटी- पीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " श्री ' है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /393 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वत्चालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

TOP OF INDUCOMOR

SLA WINE

Max 1000 K M: n 02 E100 Cast 11

LEAN STAR

BQUARE

BOTTOM OFINDICATOR

SUREE

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्मलं की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्फ्ले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम ४ के उप - नियम (9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -2 ( 181 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II -SEC . 3(ii )]

New Delhi, the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 151. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (sce the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy ever periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) readwith sub- rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) ofrule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of mediem accuracy (accuracy class- III ) of series " JPT- PF " and with brand name " SHREE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M /s . J. P. Technology, Block No. 21/355 Raghuvir Apartment , Near Panchdev Mandir, Near Arbuda Nagar Bus Stop , Odhav, Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /393 ;

The said model is a stain gauge iype load celi based now automatic weighing instrument Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Mode!

TOP OFINDICEFOR

Max 1000

SEALWIRE

Min 02 20

SRAL WIRE E1001

Class

FAD SQUARE SEAL

BOTTOM OF INDICATOR

SHREE

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram ofthe sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by hole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control tocalibration .A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the sarne principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 181 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 359

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012.ौल 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2011

का.आ. 152. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा करे प्रस्तुत स्पिोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन; नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञाप अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स जे पी टैक्नोलोजी , ब्लॉक नं. 21/355 रघुवीर अपार्टमेंट , पंचदेव मंदिर के पास , अरबुदा नगर बस स्टाप के पास, ओधव , अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जेपीटी- टीटी -3 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " श्री' है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11/401 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यायतः धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

TOP BODY OF SCALE

SPAL WA

0000

MAL 3..

BOTTOM OF SCALI

152

LEAD SQUARE

SEAL

आकृति-2- मॉडल को सौलिंग करने का योजनांबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग ब्राम्भर जिल्लाल कर अहिल से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध वग्राम उपरोक्त दिन गधा है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम (9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुभोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापभान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * , 5× 10 %, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समृतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 181 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 24th October, 2011

S.O. 152. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act. 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule (6 ) of Rule 8 and sub - rule ( 4 ) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class- III ) of series " JPT- TT- 3 " and with brand name " SHREE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s. J. P. Technology, Block No. 21/355 Raghuvir Apartment , Near Panchdev Mandir. Near Arbuda Nagar Bus Stop , Odhav, Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /401;

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

HOP BODY OF SCALE

0000

DADE QUAP

BOTTOM OF SALE

LEAD SQUARE SEAL

Figure-2- Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of the model

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - rule (9) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 * , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 181 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 361 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 25 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 153.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स अफा एक्यूरेट टेक्नोलोजी , 13/52 , ए वी रोड, प्रथम क्रास , कलसिपल्यम , बंगलौर-560002 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एएफ -75" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित " टैक्सी/आटो फेयर मीटर " के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एएफएफए " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /365 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल " टैक्सी/ आटो फेयर मीटर " ( फ्लेग टाइप ) मापन उपकरण है जो लगातार योग करता जाता है और यात्री द्वारा देय भाड़े को यात्रा के दौरान किसी भी समय दर्शाता है । सार्वजनिक वाहन के यात्रियों द्वारा देय भाड़ा , तय की गई दूरी और निर्धारित स्पीड से कम पर व्यतीत किए गए समय का फलन है जो प्राधिकृत शुल्क के अनुसार अनुपूरक भाड़े से स्वतंत्र है । मीटर की रीडिंग लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) द्वारा दर्शायी जाती है । टैक्सी मीटर का' के' फेक्टर 1350 प्लसेस प्रति किलोमीटर है । इंडीकेटर में अधिकतम किराया सूचन के लिए 5 अंक दो डेसीमल प्वाइंट सहित , कि.मी. में अधिकतम दूरी दर्शाने के लिए 5 अंक एक डेसीमल प्वाइंट सहित 5 अंक ( 3 अंक मिनट और 2 अंक सैकेंड के लिए ) अधिकतम समय दर्शाने के लिए , और 6 अंक ( 2)अंक घंटे के लिए , 2 अंक मिनट के लिए और 2 अंक सैकेंड के लिए ) रियल टाइप क्लॉक ( आर टी सी ) दर्शाने के लिए है ।

आकृति-।

FOR HIRE

Screw

of the Meter

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सोल के सत्यापन के लिए, मीटर के पृष्ठ भाग में नीचे की तरफ होल्स के साथ दो छेद दिए गए हैं जिन में से लीडिड वायर निकाला गया है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना मीटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (215 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2GI/12-13 362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA , JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

[ PART II-SEC.30 )]

NewDeibi, the25th October. 2011

S.O. 153.--Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conforinity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act. 2009 (1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied corditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 ofthe Lega ! Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) readwith sub - rule (6 ) ofrule 8 and sub -rale (4 ) ofrule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of " Taxi / Auto Fare Meter " with digitat indicacion ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) of " AF - 75 " series and with brand name " AFFA " manufactured byM/s . Aifa Accurate Technologies , 13/52 , A. V. Read, Ist Cross . Kalasipalyam , Bangalore - 560002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/11 /365:

The said model of " Taxi Aute Fare Vieter " ( flag type ) is a measuring instrument which totalizes continuously and indicates the fore at any moment of journey the charges payable by the passenger of a public vehicle as function of the distance travelled and below a certain need , the fare is calculated as function of the time taken . This being independent of supplementary charges according to the authorized tariffs . The reading of the meter is indicated by the graphic liquid crystal display (LCD ) . The ' k ' factor of the Taxi Meter is 1350 pulses per kilometer. The indicator have 5 digits with two decimal points for maximum fare indication , 5 årgits with one decimal point in km . for maximum distance indication , 5 digits (3digits for minute and 2 digits for second ) for maximum tirne indication , and 6 digits (2 digits for hour , 2digits for minutes , 2digits for second for real time clock ( RTC ) indication.

Figure- iModel

FOR HIRE

Surew

Seoling of the Moter

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing is done on the rear bottom of the meter, two screws with holes are provided through which the landed wirewill be passed to receive the verification seal and stamp. The meter cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A schermatic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 215 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) 」

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24. 1933

363

नई दिल्ली, 25 अक्तूबर, 2011

का.आ. 154.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः . अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम (6 ) और नियम : के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 (2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते मैसर्स वीटेक्स इंडिया लिमिटेड , 1-4/1 , चंगीचरेला बाडुप्पल मण्डल , घाटकेसर , आर. आर. डिस्ट-500092 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , X (x ) जहा x -1 वाले " डब्ल्यूआईएल - डब्ल्यूएफ " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम "वीटक्स " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है । और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 /363 समनुदेशित किया गया है अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि. ग्रा. और ' डी ' वेल्यू 5 ग्रा. के साथ उत्पाद की मात्रा और प्रकृति पर निर्भर करते हुए इसकी बारम्बारता 20 फिल्स प्रति मिनट है । मशीन को सभी प्रकार के फ्री फ्लोइंग मेटिरियल जैसे कैमिकल्स , चीनी , सूजी , रवा आदि के भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायाड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता 3

70 kg

Weitex

88888 Kg Weitex

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के रियर साइड में कवर और ब्रेकिट में दो बोरेड स्क्रू करके , इन छेदों में से लीडिड गोलिंग वायर कसा जाता है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इसे कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए प्रयोग नहीं किया जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप न्वित्र भो दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 214 )/2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 / PAUSA 24, 1933

364

New Delhi , the 25th October, 2011

S.O. 154. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule (6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic gravimetric filling instrument belonging to accuracy class . X(x) where x = 1 of series " WIL - WF " and with brand name " WEITEX " (hereinafter referred to as the said moder ) , manufacturedby M/s Weitex India Limited , 1-4/ 1 , Chengicherla , Boduppal Mandal , Ghatkesar . R. R. Dist - 500092 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 11 / 363;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic gravimetric filing instrument. It has maximum capacity of 50 kg . and d value cf 5 2. with a frequency of 10 fills per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product. The machine is designed for filling all types of free flowing materials like chemicals , sugar , suji , rawa etc. The LightEmitting Dio' e ( LED) display indica tes the weighing result The instrument operates on 230 Volts . 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Model

678 kg

88888 Kg

Weitex

Figure- 2 Sealing Diagram of the sealing provision of the model

On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket , for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external o.. ban

Furtner, in exercise ofthe powe con'eiredby sub -rule (9 ) ofrule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Goven ment he :Loy declares tha this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg.

manufactured by the same manufacture n accorderct with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been maructured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 214)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 365 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

( भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ) नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 155. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक( कों) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31-12-2011

संशोधन संख्या ।

दिसम्बर 2011

आईएस 15103 : 2002 अग्नि प्रतिरोधक इस्पात - विशिष्टि

इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कायालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे था तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं । तिथि : 30-12-2011

[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 4/टी -207 ] पी. घोष , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी ) (BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS) Nev. Delhi , the 30th December, 2011

S.O. 155.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

No. and Year of

the amendment

No. and Title of the Standard(s)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31-12-2011

Amendment No.1

December2011

IS 15103 : 2002 Fire Resistant Steel- Specification

Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram . Date:30-12-2011

[Ref: MTD 4 /T- 207 ]

P. GHOSH , Scientist ' F ' & Head ( Met Engg. )

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 201 ।

का.आ. 156.-- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के संशोधन विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

क्रम सं. स्थापित भारतीय मानक के के संशोधन की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , कीसंख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31 दिसम्बर, 2011 1 .

कुछ नहीं

संशोधन संख्या 5- आईएस 14625 : 1999 प्लास्टिक की प्रभरण बोतलें [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

366

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर . गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

तिथि: 30-12-2011

[संदर्भ : पीसीडी/जी-7 ( गजट)

डा. ( श्रीमती ) विजय मलिक , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( पीसीडी ) New Do thi , the 30th December , 2011

S.O. 156. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated : --

SCHEDULE

Date of Established SL.No. No. and Year and title of the Indian Standards Established

No. arid Year of Indian Standard , if ary, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(1)

(3)

(2)

31 December 2011

None

1. Amendment No. 5 to IS 14625: 1999 Plastics Feeding Bottles

Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg . New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai. Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur . Nagpur, Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

Date: 30-12-2011

[ Ref : POD/ G- 7 ( Gazettel

Dr. (Mrs. ) VIJAY MALIK . Scientist & Head ( PCD )

नई दिल्ली , 2 जनवरी , 2012

का.आ. 157.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम + के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानका ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :

अनुसूची

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

भामा सं. / भाग/खण्डः वर्ष

लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता 4

6 2

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह 3

भाना 1293 : 2005 1. 3781170 8-12-2011

250 वोल्टता और 16 एम्पीअर्स तक रेटित धारा के प्लग्स और सॉकेट आउटलेटस

उजाला स्विचेस एंड डिवायसेस प्रा. लि. , 22 , 30 योगी इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, राम मंदिर रोड , गोरेगांव पश्चिम, मुबई -400104

भामा 3854 : 1997 23781271 8-12-2011 उजाला स्विचेस एंड डिवायसंप घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों केलिएस्विचं

प्रा. लि. , 22, 30 योगी इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, राम मंदिर रोड , गोरेगांव पश्चिम मुबंई-400104

भामा

3. 3781776 9-12-2011

घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों के लिएस्त्रिचे

ज्वेल इन्टरप्रायजेस गाला नं 7. इरीडीअम इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , गेनेसीस इण्ड. टाउनशीप , विलेज कार्डगाव . पालघर , थाने , पीन-401404 367 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भा मा 1293 : 2005 15-12-2011

4. 3783073

250 वोल्टता और 16 एम्पीअर्स तक रेटित धारा के प्लग्स और सॉकेट-

ज्वेल इन्टरप्रायजेस गाला नं 7 , इरीडीअम इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , गेनेसीस इण्ड. टाउनशीप , विलेज कोईगाव, पालघर , थाने , पीन-401404

भा मा 1293: 2005 28-12-2011

5. 3785582

250 वोल्टता और 16 एम्पीअर्स तक रेटित धारा के प्लग्स और सॉकेट-

अलटीमा हाय टेक प्रा. लि. , गाला नं. 9 , लक्ष्मी इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , वालीव विलेज, सातीवली, वसई पूर्व , थाने , पीन--401208

[सं. के.प्र.वि./13 : 11 ]

एस. बी. राय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एम डी एम- III )

New Delhi , the 2nd January, 2012

S.O. 157. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of the Regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

IS No./Part/Sec./Year

Product

Grant Date Name and Address ( Factory) ofthe Party

Licence No.

Sl . No.

IS 1293: 2005

8-12-2011

3781170

Plugs and socket outlets of250 volts and rated current to 16 amperes

Ujala Switches& Devices Pvt . Ltd. 22 , 30, Yogi Indl . Estate , Rammandir Road Goregaon West Mumbai-400104

IS 3854: 1997

8-12-2011

3781271

Switches for domestic and similar Purposes

Ujala Switches & Devices Pvt. Ltd. 22, 30, Yogi Indl. Estate, Rammandir Road Goregaon West Mumbai-400104

IS 3854: 1997 9-12-2011

3. 3781776

Switches for domestic and similar Purposes

JewelEnterprises Gala No. 7, Iridium Ind. Estate, Genesis Ind . Township , Village Koegaon, Palghar Thane , Pin -401404

IS 1293 : 2005 15-12-2011

4. 3783073

Plugs and socket outlets of250 volts and rated current to 16 amperes

Jewel Enterprises GalaNo. 7, Iridium Ind. Estate, Genesis Ind. Township, Village Koegaon, Palghar Thane , Pin -401404

IS1293: 2005 28-12-2011

5. 3785582

Plugs and socket outlets of250 volts and rated current to 16 amperes

Altima Hi Tech Pvt . Ltd. Gala No. 9 , Laxmi Ind . Estate, Waliv Village, Sativali , Vasai East , Dist-Thane, Pin -401208

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]

S. B. ROY, Scientist ' F ' & Head (MDM - III ) 368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम्बर , 2011

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, Zonal Manager, Patna in terminating the services of Shri Ajay Kumar on 2-7-1999 was justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"

का.आ. 158. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय-2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 178/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल-12012/26/2001- आई आर( बी- II ]

शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 25th November, 2011

S.O. 158. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 178 / 2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court- 2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government of 21-11-2011 .

[F. No. L- 12012/26/2001 - IR(B - II) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10

2. The case of the petitioner Ajay Kumar is that he had continuously worked as permanent Sub- Staff from August, 1989 to 21st June, 1992 against permanent vacancy in the B.C.P. Mary Branch and thereafter from 22-6-1992 to Nov. 1999 at Gaya Regional Office, Gaya, since its opening as per direction of the Management. During the period, he also attended outdoor duties and received travelling expenses duly sanctioned by the Competent Authority. A public Sector Undertaking not only believes in the theory of Hire and Fire but the Management thinks thatthe workman are denizens of an Animal Farm to be eliminated ruthlessly the moment they became useless to the establishment. The theory is disapprovable . The Management not only exploited the poor workman by not paying him proper wages but also by not maintaining proper records regarding his engagement; as the workman was paid through different paper arrangement even in differentnames . As soon as the workman started to demand for his proper wage and other benefits , the management terminated his service by stopping him from duty without any reason and compliance of the mandatory provision of law. Though he challenged it before the ALC( C ) concerned and disapproved the Management's plea of non relationship of employer and employee yet its conciliation proceeding failed due to the adamant attitude ofthe Management; hence the reference for adjudication. The action of the Management of Bank of india in terminating his service since 2-7-99 was illegal , vindictive, and anti - labour policy.

(1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 .

Reference No. 178 of 2001

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workmen .

The petitioner in his rejoinder specifically denying the allegation of the Management has further pieaded that the Bank has no legal right to explit a workman under Art . 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

APPEARANCES:

On behalf of the workman

: Mr. D.Mukherjee, Advocate .

On behalf of the employers

Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate.

State: Jharanand

Industry: Banking

Dhanbad, Dated, the 3rd November, 2011

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1) (d ) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. 1-12012/26/2001 - IR( B - II ) dated 15/ 18-06-2001 .

3. On the other hand, the pleaded case of the Management is that the disputaret (petitioner) Ajay Kumar was never appointed as a subordinate staff in the Bank as a Public Undertaking is a State as meant under Art. 12 of the Constitution of India , so the Bank cannot appoint any person in contravention of Art . 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India as well as the Rules of the Bank for appointment of Sub- Staff. No employer and employee relationship exists between the Management and him , as he is not a workman in the terms of Sec . 2s of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 just as the present issue is not an Industrial Dispute under Sec . K of the Act . The Act permits interference with the limited class of its employees , who are workman as defined in it . Non - engagement of a coolie does not amount to discharge/dismissal/ retrenchment / 369 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

continuous attendance for more than 240 days in each year and the aforesaid alleged certificate as manufactured one . He has also admitted that the Joint Zonal Manager issuing the aforesaid Certificate ( Ext. W- 1 ) was not posted at Gaya , and that he had prepared this appears (vouchers- Ext. W- 2 series ) in his own hand writing .

termination . The petitioner might have been engaged by the Bank as a coolie or labourer to perform specified job on a particular day. But he has never been engaged by the Bank continuously for 240 days in any calendar year against any permanent vacancy. Since he was never in the employment of the Bank, no question of his termination from his service arises .

In its rejoinder with its categorical denials to the allegations of the petition , the Management has further pleaded that whenever he was engaged as a coolie , he was paid travelling expenses . He as a job seeker is trying to enter into the employment of the Bank through litigation . The question of payment of wages according to the scale of the Bank does not arise in the face of his non- engagement as staff by the Bank just as that of termination in case of his never appointment as an employee of the Bank.

FINDING WITH REASONING

4. In this case , only WW- 1 Ajay Kumar , the petitioner in behalf of himself, has been examined , but the evidence ofthe Management due to its failure in production of its witnesses despite ample opportunity given for it resulted inthe closure of the Management as per Orderdt . 1-6-2011 ofthe Tribunal . Hence it came up for hearing argument .

6.Mr. D. Mukherjee , the Ld . Senior Counsel for the Union submits that admittedly the workman worked as a coolie as stated in para - 8 and 11 of the W.S. of the Management and in view of the Certificatedt . 16-7-97 (Ext.W- 1 ) ( after objection ) and payment ofsanction orders (Vouchers- Ext. W- 2 series ) as well as non - production of the original documents of the vouchers called for through the petitiondt . 8-7-2003 in behalf of the workman , it goes to prove the statement of workman as a proof of his claim. Two authorities namely, 2006 ( 105 ) FLR1067 ( SC ) ( CB) , Manager , RBI , Bangalore- versus - S . Mani as held therein that pleadings are no substitute of proof; and AIR 1982 (ALL) 385 ( DB) , National Inse. Cov. Ltd. , Kanpur- versus- Yogendra Nath as held therein that the averments contained in the Written Statement cannot take the place ofproofunless evidence is produced by the adverse party- relied upon by the aforesaid Senior Counsel for the workman. In response to the aforesaid argument , Mr. D.K. Verma , the Ld. Advocate for the management has contended that it is the admission of the workman himself as stated in para- 5 of the W.S. that he was paid through different paper arrangements and even in different names , the same itself proves that the workman was never appointment by the Management as a Peon and moreover, he has failed to prove his continuous working for 240 days in any year , as such his claim for regularisation is unsustainable in the eye of law.

7. On the scrutiny of the materials available on the case record, I find even the alleged certificatedt. 16th July, 1997 ( Ext. W- 1 after objection) alleged to have been issued by the Joint Zonal Manager concerned about his working from May, 1993 to September, 1994 during the tenure of the later does not specify in whose capacity he worked, though such certificate cannot be the base nor canprovide any entitlement to the workman for his claim. It is also evident from the vouchers prepared by the workman ( Ext . W- 2 series ) which prove the payment of expenses over travelling from Gaya to Patna , and to other places as assigned and passed by the Management for the work concerned. In case of non - production of the documents as called for by the petitiondt . 18-6-04 of the workman, namely, the Certificatedt. 16-7-97 and the payment sanctioned order as per Annexure - W, the workman ought to have established the relevant documents as secondary evidence before the Tribunal , butunfortunately the workman has failed to establish it , moreover , none of the documents has proved the claim of theworkman for working as a Peon continuously for more than 240 days in a calendar year .

5. After the perusal of the case record , I find the statement of WW- 1 Ajay Kumar , the workman himself is that he was appointed to the post of Peon by the Branch Manager of the Bank of India , Birchand Patel Marg, Patna in the year 1989 and he worked in that capacity upto 21-6-92; thereafter on his transfer to Gaya Regional Office, he also worked there from 22-6-92 to November , 1999 continuously by putting his attendance for more than 240 days in a year . Further he has stated that the Management used to pay his wages through vouchers , that the Management used to pay him the wages for Holidays and Sundays , but the Management never paid him the wages equal to that of a permanent staff, for which on his representation the Management stopped him from working without any chargesheet or any reason . The workman has denied to have occasionally discharged his duty as a coolie. The photo copy ofthe certificate dt . 16th July, 1997 issued to him by the Joint Zonal Manager marked as Ext . W- 1 ( after objection ) and the photo copies of the vouchers for the payment of wages to the workman marked as Ext . W-2 series . But the workman ( WW- 1 ) in his cross- examination has admitted not to have got any appointment letter from the Management/Branch Manager concerned to serve as a Peon in the year 1989. Though he claims to have received the order of his transfer to the Regional Office Gaya, but instead of producing it his plea that the same is lying with the office file of the Management appears to be absurd. He has denied the payment of charges of conveyance as well as the wages to him whenever he was sent to any place to discharge his duty as coolie , his not

2GI/12-14 370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

Vs.

: 2nd Party/Management

TheRegional Manager Central Bank of India Regional Office, 48/49, Montieth Road, Egmore Chennai -600008

APPEARANCES :

8. Under these circumstances , I find that since the workmancasually worked for few days in a year so there was no relationship of employer and employee between the alleged workman and the management . Hence , no question as to that of the maragement of Bank of India Zonal Manager , Patna , in terminating the service of ShriAjay Kumar on 2-7-1999 whether justified or unjustified arises . Therefore the alleged workman is not entitled to any relief, in the eye of law.

Forthe 1st Party/Petitioner Union

KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer

: M/s . K. M. Ramesh , Advocates नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम्बर , 2011

For the 2nd Party/Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co. Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12011 /3 /2007 - IR ( B - II) dated 7-9-2007 and Corrigendum dated 11-9-2009 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

का.आ. 159.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

[सं. एल-12011 /3/2007- आई आर ( बी- II ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 25th November , 2011

"Whether the demand for regularizing the services ofSri P. Balakrishnan , Part - Time Safai Karamchari as full-time Safai Karamchari is justified ? If not , to what relief Sri P. Balakrishnan is entitled ? "

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 52/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their Claim , Counter Statement as the case may be .

3.Theaverments in the Claim Statement briefly read asfollows:

S.O. 159.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 52/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011.

[No. L- 12011 /3/2007 - IR(B - II )] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Thursday, the 22nd September , 2011

PRESENT : A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 52/2007

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), between the Management of Central Bank of India and their Wrokmen. ]

BETWEEN

TheGeneral Secretary : 1st Party/ Petitioner Union

Central Bank of India

Employess Union

11 , 2nd Line Beach ,

Chennai -600001

From the concerned employee , a Part- Time Safai Karamachari ( PTSK) with half wages , was extracted work offull time Sub-Staff from 21-09-1996 to 30-10-1999 in the place of a permanent Sub - Staff. Thus he was required to work for more than 40 hours per week which is normal working hours of a full - time Sub - Staff. He was then paid full-time Sub- Staff wages also . Stipulated working hours for half scale wages is 19 hours per week . There is a policy to fill up 25% of vacancies in the Sub - Staff cadre from among part -time sweepers apart from recruiting fresh candidates through Employment Exchange after an interview in respect of other 75% vacancies . Instead of resorting to any of the modes of recruitment for filling-up vacancies of Sub - Staff cadre the workman was made to work the duty of Sub - Staff for over 3 years . The employee was also asked to perform additional duty of Daftary drawing Special Pay, which a Part- Time Sweeper cannot be asked to perform . His engagement is against a clear permanent vacancy and not on supernumery post . His representation for absorption as Full- Time Sub- Staff member was not favoured . He was never informed that he has to do the work temporarily. After over 3 years the place of Sub - Staff was filled with fresh hand denying his 371

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

claim . There are vacancies and therefore there is no difficulty for his absorption. ID raised having ended in a failure report the reference is occasioned . The mistakes in the reference in his initial as " K" instead of " P" and as Full-Time Safai Karamachari instead of as " Full - Time Sub- Staff have been sought to be corrected under a corrigendum. Hence the claim.

4. Counter Statement averments briefly read as follows:

Ex. M 17-Office Order dated 15-04-2011 of the Regional Office of Cenral Bank of India, Chennai under which the Board of Dirctors of the Bank on 22-01-2011 approved for elevation of all existing permanent Part - Time Safai Karamacharis drawing scale wages as Safai Karamachari- cum-Sub-Staff in full time as a one time dispensation. Now with this elevation the demand of the workman for regularization as Full - Time Safai Karamachari has been virtually acceded to by the Management though only prospectively from 18-04-2011 . But the same is not reply to the reference in which the antiquity of his claim for regularization dates back to much an anterior date .

In recruitmentthe Respondent has to adhere to the guidelines of the Goverment including reservation policy. There is no provision for any Part - Time Safai Karamachari to be automaticaly elevated to the position of Sub-Staff. Even PTSK's drawing the scale of pay of Sub- Staff are not Sub - Staff because their nature of work is different . By merely performing the work of Full- Time Sub- Staff one will not get any right to claim the post of Full -Time Sub- Staff. When a vacancy of PTSK in a branch carrying 1/3rd, 1/2 or 3/4 wages or full - scale wages as applicable to Permanent Sub- Staff arises then the PTSKs of the lower scale can apply for the post amont whom the senior most willbe considered . All eligible candidates including PTSKs can participate in the selection process for the post of Sub- Staff or Clarical post and successful candidates would beappointed. The concerned employee did not participate in the selection process . In the one selection process he participated he was not successful . Hence his demand is not justified . With the engagement as Full - Time Sub-Staff for the period from 26-09-1996 to 26-10-1999 at which date only one Sub -Staff ( regular ) was appointment he cannot claim regularization as Full - Time Sub - Staff or in full -scale wages as PTSK . The claim is to be rejecjted.

5. Points for consideration ( as per amended Corrigendum dated 11-09-2009 ) are as follows:

(1) Whether the demand for regularizing Sri P. Balakrishnan , Part- Time Safai Karamachari as Full- Time Safari Karamachari is legal and justified?

(ii) To what relied the concerned workman is entitled ?

6. The evidence consists of oral evidence of WWI and Ex. WI to Ex . W16 ( subject to objection regarding Ex.W5 , Ex.W7 , Ex. W12 , & Ex . W 13 , that the witness is not the author of those documents ) on the petitioner's side and Ex . M1 to Ex. M18 # on the Respondent's side with no oral evidence adduced .

Points (i ) & (ii)

8. The workman is an employee who happened to be engaged temporarily, though not so made knwon to him as per his version , as a Sub - Staff in a regular vacancy due to the vacancy having not been filled up for a good period say above 3 years as in the present case . During the period he was being given the wages payable to the Sub-Staff. That cannot perse entitle the workman for regularization as a Sub - Staff , which could only be done on the basis of seniority as well as on his emerging successful in a selection process and interview in which he failed on the occasion on which he attended the process and thereafter without appearing again to undergo the selection process against the 25 % vacancy earmarked for recruitment from Part-Time Staff keeping open the remaining 75% for recruitment in accordance with the rules and guidelines laid down for the same . Hence the workman is not at all entited to regularization as Sub-Staff consistent with recruitment rules , norms and procedures . Now with Ex . M17-Office Order he stands to gain and he has been elevated to a Full- Time post as a one - time measure and the benefit of Full - Time service enures to him with Full- Time wages . By this all existing Permanent Part - Time Safai Karamacharis stand to gain with the conversion as Safai Karamachari - cum- Sub-Staff in Full-Time in a one-time measure. This order is anticipating avoidance of any mischief, absurdity or awkwardness in the matter of treatment of workman standing on the same or similar footing and is advantageous to all them affecting nobody's interest, seniority or service conditions , interse . On the contrary, the claim of the workman , if allowed , would result in transgression of all or any of the above rights of his counterpart workmen not similarly situated in terms of seniority and allied matters like him . Recognized rules or norms or procedure cannot permit elevation of the workman in disregard of the rightful claims , qualifications , etc. of other workman who have a better claim than him . In no view of the matter the workman's demand for regularization could be held as justifed. Therefore he is not entitled to the claim of regularization as demanded other than the boon of a regularization now has ensured to him as per the magnanimous decision of the Boad of Directors of the Bank as expressed and implemented under Ex. M17 -Office Order dated 15-04-2011 .

7. Heard both sides . Perused the records and documents . As is evident from Ex. M18-Joining Report dated 18-04-2011 the workman joined duty as Safai Karamachari-cum- Sub- Staff in full - time on 18-04-2011 at Kadamalaiputhur branch . He could command this as per 372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

9. The reference is answered accordingly . (Dictated to the PA transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 22nd September, 2011 ) .

A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :

For the 1st Pary/Petitioner : WW1 , Sri D.B. Gopinath Union

For the 2nd Party/Management : None

Documents Marked :-

On the petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Ex. WI 03-02-1993 Appreciation letter issued by the Respondent/Bank to the concerned workman for participation in the team for bringing the balancing of books position of Kadamalaiputhur Branch.

Ex. W2 04-03-1993 Appreciation letter issued by the

for Respondent/ Bank to the concerned workman participation in tallying the books trailing too far behind of Kadamalaiputhur Branch.

Ex. W3 27-08-1996 Appreciation letter issued by the Respondent/Bank Management to the concerned workman for mobilizing deposit to the Bank .

Ex. W4 01-07-1998 Letter of Asstt . Regional

Manager of Respondent/Bank to the Kadamalaiputhur Branch for payment of difference in wages for the services extracted asPeon .

Ex. W5 25-07-1998 Letter of Asstt . Regional

Manager of Respondent/Bank to the Kadamalaiputhur Branch for payment of difference in wages for the services extracted asPeon .

Ex. W6 29-03-2000 Letter of Petitioner Union to the Regional Manager , Chennai of the Respondent Bank .

Ex. W7 07-11-2000 Letter of Asstt . Regional Manager of Respondent/Bank to the Kadamalaiputhur Branch regarding payment of difference of wages for the services extracted as Peon .

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)) Ex. W8 04-12-2000 Representation of the concerned workman in the ID to the Respondent/Bank.

Ex. W9 18-07-2000 Appreciation letter issued by the Respondent/ Bank to the concerned workman for mobilizing deposit to the Bank .

Ex. W10 08-12-2000 Letter from Petitioner Union to the Regional Manager of Respondent/Bank .

Ex. W11 14-07-2001 Letter from Petitioner Union to the Regional Manager of Respondent/Bank .

Ex. W12 24-03-2004 Letter from Asstt . Regional Manager of Respondent/Bank to Kadamalaiputhur Branch .

Ex. W13 22-04-2004 Letter from Kadamalaiputhur Branch to the Regional Office , Chennai of the Respondent/ Bank .

Ex. W14 27-07-2005 Letter from Asstt . General Manager , Regional Office , Chennai of Respondent/Bank to Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central ) .

Ex. W15 10-08-2005 Reply filed by the Petitioner Union before Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central).

Ex. W16 17-11-2007 Letter from Petitioner Union to the Ministry of Labour Government of India, New Delhi reg . amendment of terms of reference .

On the Respondent's side :-

Date

Ex. No.

Description

Ex.MI 14-05-1991 Bank Circular on payment of wages to Part- Time Safai Karamachari .

Ex.M2 29-10-1991 Probationary Appointment order issued to Petitioner.

Ex. M3 05-07-1994 Enhancement of Wage Scale of Petitioner w.e.f. 10-06-1992.

Ex.M4 14-07-1984 Circular of the Bank on recruitment of subordinate staff from Employment Exchange .

Ex.M5 23-09-1996 Promotion letter issued to Mr. K. K. Khader.

373

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Ex. M6 01-07-1996 Circular providing for differential wages if petitioner was asked to work as a Peon .

Ex. M7 16-02-1999 Application calling for promotion of subordinate cadre to Clerical Cadre .

Ex. M8 26-10-1999 Order appointing Mr. Vijay Kumar as Subordinate Staff. 15-12-1999 Call letter to Mr. V. Vadivel .

Ex.M9

Ex. M10 13-01-2000 Letter communication to Mr. A. Vadivel-Selection as Peon.

Ex. M11 12-01-2001 Minutes of Meeting with the Union .

Ex. M12 22-02-2002 Call letter to the petitioner for written test.

Ex. M13 27-07-2005 Letter submitted by Respondent to Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central ) .

Ex. M14 10-08-2005 Reply submitted by Respondent to Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central ) .

Ex. M15 10-04-2006 Reply submitted by Respondent to Assistant Commissioner of Labour ( Central ) .

Ex.M16 15-04-2011 Office Order issued by the

Respondent to P. Balakrishnan (PTSK) concerned workman in this dispute ( Ref.R.O./HRD/ 2011-12/051 ) .

Ex. M17 15-04-2011 Letter from Regional Office of to Respondent/Bank Kadamalaiputhur Branch --- regarding P. Balakrishnan .

Ex. M18 18-04-2011 Joining Report

Balakrishnan . of P. नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 160.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार ई.सी.सल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रमन्यायालय , धनबाद-2 , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2008) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012 / 1/2008- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th December, 2011 S.O. 160. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2008) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-2, Dhanbad as shown in Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M /s . ECL, and their workman , whichwas received by the Central Government on 15-12-2011 .

[No. L-20012/ 1 /2008 -IR(C - I) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT:

SHRI KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I. D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 11 of 2008

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Mugma Area of M /s . ECL and their workman .

APPEARANCES :

: None

Onbehalf ofthe workman

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate State : Jharkhand

Industry : Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 30th November, 2011 ORDER

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/1/2008 - IR( CM - 1 ) dated, the 21st January, 2008 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union from the Management of Hariajam Colliery of M/s . ECL to give Shri Mahabir Roy Timber Mazdoor Cat. V. under SLU from 12-5-96 and Cat-VI under SLU from 12-5-2004 is justified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ?"

2.None represented the Union/workman nor W.S. filed on behalf of the Union , but Mr. D. K. Verma, the Ld . Advocate for the management is present .

3. Perusal of the case record transpires it is pending abinitio for appearance and filing of the W.S. in behalf of the Union/workman , for which registered noticesdt . 9-6-08 , 18-1-11 , dt . 11-5-11 , and lastly show cause registered notiesdt . 1-7-2011 were issued to the Secretary of the Union on its address as noted in the reference , yet despite the last change , no Written Statement has been filed on behalf of the Union . The present reference as per 374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dhanbad, Dated , the 30th November , 2011

AWARD

the schedule refers to the demand of the Union concerned for giving workman Mahabir Roy, Timber Mazdoor of Cat.V under S.L.U. from 12-5-96 and Cat . VI under the same from 12-5-2004 . In view of the aforesaid conduct of the Union workman , it prima facie shows the disinterestedness of the Union as well as the workman in persuing the case for adjudication .

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their (Order No. L- 20012/415 / 1998 - C- I dated 21-4-1999.

3. Therefore , proceeding with the case for uncertainty is futile as well as wastage of time and energy of the Tribunal . Hence , the case is closed for the reason disinterestedness of the Union concerned in persuing it, and accordingly order is passed.

SCHEDULE

KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2011

" Whether the action of the managemert of M/s. BCCL in not correcting the date ofbirth of Sh . Ram Swaroop Beldar, Driver as 1-5-1947 isjusti fied? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "

का.आ. 161.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , धनबाद नं.2, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 227/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/415/1998- आई आर ( सी-1) ] डी.एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 15th December, 2011

S.O. 161.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 227/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court -2 , Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-12-2011.

[No. L -20012/ 415/ 1998- IR (C -I) ]

D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 227 of 1999

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Block IIArea ofM/s . BCCL and their workman.

2. The case of the Representative Union for the workman is that initially appointed as Wagon Loacer on 18-11-1972 posted at Benidih Colliery, the workmar . Ram Swaroop Beldar was a Permanent employee of Block II M/ s. BCCL. He had declared his date of birth as 1-5-1947 at the time of his employment at Benedih Colliery, wherefrom thereafter he was transferred to Block II Area as Khalasi in the year 1983 , thereafter posted as Driver in Dec. , 1984 at Adm . Depot . Regional Office Block II Area M/ s.BCCL, since then he had been performing the assigned job of a Driver with unblemished career . The Service Excerpt in the year 1987 furnished to him transpired his date of birth was wrongly mentioned as 31-1-1938 instead of 1-5-1947, the workman respectfully submitted several representations to the Management for the correction of his date of birth wrongly written by the Management, and that he was 40 years as on 6-8-87 . But no effect, and lastly a letter of retirement Ref. No. GM/ED/ RETD/ 1562 , dt . 16-11-97 was issued. On raising the Industrial Dispute for it , during the pendency of its conciliation proceeding, he was wrongly and arbitrarily retired by the Management w.e.f. 31-1-1998 forcibly against the principle of natural justice , and against the Instruction No. 37 of J.B.B.C. which provides for the review and correction ofwrong date of birth of existing employees of M/s. BCCL in case of Non - Matriculate but educated , the School Leaving Certificate concerning date of birth shall be treated as correct date of birth , and in case of illiterate person, his birth date/ age will be assessed by the Medical Board. So the action of the management in not correcting the date ofbirth of workman Ram Swaroop Beldar, Driver, as 1-5-1947 is not justified, and the workman is entitled to the review and determination of his birth date on basis of the School Leaving Certificate or its determination by the Apex Medical Board .

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : None

Categorically denying the allegations of the Management in its written statement it has been pleaded [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

in a rejoinder on behalf of the workman that his birth date as on 18-11-72 at the time of his appointment was truly recorded as 25 years in the Form ' B ' Register .

3.Whereas the management has pleaded in its written statement that the workman concerned was appointed as Driver ora 18-11-72 , and at the time of his appointment, was 35 years as on 31-1-73 as recorded in Form B Register, the Statutory Register maintained under the Mines Act, andhe had put his signature on it as his acceptance of the entries made therein . In the year 1987 , his date ofbirth was recorded as 31-1-38 in the Service Excerpt , on the receipt of which he had objected it but without any proof or documentary evidence, so his objection to it was rejected. On the basis of his aforesaid date of birth, he has been retired from service w.e.f. 31-1-98 , after giving six months prior notice of it . Therefore, the action ofthe management in the terms of the reference justified and the workman is not entitled to any relief.

FINDING WITH REASONING

375

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

5. In view of the aforesaid statement of the management , I find and hold that the action of the management of M/s . BCCL in not correcting the date of birth of Shri Ram Swaroop Beldar as 1-5-1947 is quite justified in the eye of law and the fact as well .

KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 15 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 162. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , धनबाद नं.2, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 31/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को15-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012 / 11/1996- आई आर( सी- I ) ] डी.एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th December, 2011

S.O. 162. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/1997) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court-2, Dhanbad , as shown in Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-12-2011 .

[No. L-20012/ 11 / 1996 - IR(C - I ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT

SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 Reference No. 31 of 1997

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Katras Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman

: Mr. B.B. Pandey, Advocate

Onbehalf of the employers

Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate

State : Jharkhand

4. In the instant case after perusal of the case record, I find that despite the ample opportunity since 8-6-04 uptill 15-6-2005 , no evidence for the workman was produced in support of the claim of the workman concerning date of birth . Hence, the evidence of the workman was closed on the aforesaid later date , but one MW- 1 Gopal Prasad has been examined in behalf of the management . The statement ofMr. Gopal Prasad (MW- 1 ) as the Area Personnel Manager is that the workman concerned was initially appointed at Benedih Section of Block No. II Area and afterjoining on 18-11-1972 he become a driver in 1988 as perhis Form B Register bearing his Sl . No. 1412, the date ofcommencement of his employment and that of the first appointment of the workman with the present owner under its Col. 9910 under his LTI respectively (Ext . M - 3 ) , so his age 35 years came to be counted . On the transfer of the workman from Benedih Section to Block II Area Office , there itself again Form B Register (Ex . M -3/ 1 ) was prepared by the aforesaid Unit which bears the name of workman Ram Swaroop Beldar and his passport size black and white photo followed by the signature of the workman as well as that of the record keeper and that of the Manager concerned , according to which his age was determined as 35 years old as on 31-1-73 according to which he was superannuated on the completion of his 60 years of age , but the workman during the tenure of his service never filed anydocument to prove his D.O.B. ( date of birth ) different from the aforesaid D.O.B. So his retirement was quite proper and accordingly the claim of the workman wasnotjustified. The witness also responded to the query that he is unaware of on what basis the workman is claiming for 1-5-1947 as the date of his birth . The aforesaid management witness was discharged due to non- appearance or representation of the Union for his cross- examination despite ample opportunity for it .

Industry : Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 30th November , 2011 376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/ PAUSA 24, 1933

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/ 11/96- IR( C- I ) dated, the 5th March , 1997.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Katras Project of M/ s . BCCL in denying employment to Smt. Sugia Bhuini the dependent wife of Late Kedar Bhuia, Ex-Miner /Loader who expired on 8-1-1992 is justified ? If not, to what relief is the dependentwife entitled ?"

2. The case of the sposoring Union concerned is that petitioner Smt . Sugia Bhuini is the dependent wife of late Kedar Bhuia, Ex- Miner/Loader, who Bhuia was an employee of Katras Project under the then Katras Project Area , present under Katras Area , and was working as Miner Loader . He expired on 08-01-92 while he was on the colliery roll .As per privision under clause 9-4-2 of NCWA- IV in operation , the dependent wife Sugia Bhuini had submitted all the relevant paper to the Management on 9-3-92 for her employment . It was scrutinised and found correct in all respect . It was sent to Area where the Personnel Manager and the General Manager of the Area after being satisfied with her claim and papers in order put their signatures , and sent to the H.Q. ( Koyala Bhawan) for necessary approval . Since the workman was on the roll of the company at the time of his death, his dependent wife Sugia Bhuini received the amount under Life Cover Scheme( as per Clause 9.1 of NCWA - IV) . But her claim for employment was regretted by the Competent Authority of M /s . BCCL as per Ref. No. BCCL/ PA - VI/ 3 ( 13 ) KPA/ 7/ 93 / 21489 dtd . 15 /23-7-1994 without any reason which was communicatedto her as per the Management's letter No. KP/94/ 1603 dtd . 11/ 12-8-94 .

3. Further case of the petitioner is that late Kedar Bhuia prior to his death had resigned from his service on the ground of ill health, but the same was not accepted. Finding no alternative , the workman asked just as the Union did for resumption of his duty, for which then P.M. concerned as per letter No. KPA /PO/ 90 / F - KIMP/766 dtd . 14/ 16-8-90 sought comment from the Management , then the Management issued a chargesheet against the workman as per letter Ref. No. KP /CS/ 91 / 1049 dtd . 8/9-5-91 for alleged unauthorised absence from duty from 15-4-87 . But in course of the Enquiry being conducted by Sri B.H.S. Tiwari , Dy. P.M. as the Enquiry Officer by virtue ofhis appointment letter Ref. No. KP/ 91 /Enquiry/ 1095/ Katras Project dtd. 16-5-91 , the workman expired on 8-1-92 . As already stated that the workman was on roll of the company at the time of his death , his dependent wife had claimed for her employment but it was regretted by the Competent Authority . On the request of the Union for

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] intervention , the ALC( C) Dhanbad tried his best to prevail upon the Management to settle the issue , but due to adamant attitude of the Management , the failure of the conciliation resulted in the reference for adjudication.

4. The Union concerned represented in its rejoinder specifically denying the allegations of the Management , isthat late workman on his request even through the Union was not allowed to resume his duty, so it was not his abandonment from service . If the Management had accepted the resignation tendered by the workman , his name would have been struck offthe roll of the company, and it would not have been a change for issuance of the chargesheet and for initiation of the departmental proceeding against the workman . During the pendency of theissue raised by the Union before the D( P) ofthe BCCL, the workman died of starvation . The acceptance of the Management for initiation of departmental proceeding following the issuance of the chargesheet against the workman is on the one hand whereas its statement for alleged non - existence of the workman's name on the roll ofthe company is on another hand . The claim of applicant as dependent wife of deceased workman for employment isincorrect as per clause 9-4-2 of NCWA- IV.

5. Whereas the case of the Management in a challenge to the maintainability of the industrial dispute is that the employment to dependent is always on compassionate ground only in case of premature death in an accident , certain disease or medical unfitness of the workman . Management has discretionary power to consider each case on its merits and circumstances . Applicant Sugia Bhuini can neither be the member of the Union nor file the reference through it just as it is not raisable by a dead person .rson. Workman Kedar Bhuia, who wasworking at Katras Project Area , started to absent from hisduty from 15-4-87 , so he was considered to have abandoned his employment since then after three years of his unauthorised and unjustified absence , he was issued a chargesheet for it . On the proof of the charge at the departmental enquiry, while the Management was contemplating to issue his dismissal order, the workman submitted his resignation from service in order to avoid hisdismissal. The Management imrnediately accepted his resignation , and his name was struck off the roll . The Management however sent information to the workman to explainhis difficulties in continuing his employment ifhe wanted any assistance from the Management in any respect, but the workman did not bother, and ultimately it was reported about his death on 8-1-92 . Since the workman didnotworkmore than five years , and being absent from 15-4-87, since then he was not doing the job none , nor the applicant approached the Management for employment on his behalf. Thus the applicant being not dependent upon the workman during his absence has no justified ground for her employment, so her claim is liable to be summarily rejected .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

377

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

The Management categorically denying the allegations of the petitioner her stated in its rejoinder that the concerned lady was paid all the dues admissible and that since the workman was not on the roll of the company following the acceptance of his resignation by the company, her claim for employment had no reasonable ground for it.

FINDING WITH REASONING

6. In this case, WW- 1 Pradeep Kumar Paswan , as the Secretary of and on behalf of the Union, and MW- 1 Dipak Kr . Viswakarma, the legal Assistant in behalfofthe Management have been examined .

8. Out of the documentary proof available on the case record I find that Ex- Miner Loader Kedar Bhuia died on 8-1-92 as per the certificate issued by the Deputy Medical Superintendent , East Katras Dispensary dtd . 9-1-92 (Ext . W- 1 ) . Consequent upon the representation of petitioner Sugia Bhuini as his widow for employment (Ext. W- 2) , her representation was rejected by the management as per letters dtd . 15/23-7-94 and 11/ 12-8-94 (Ext. W-3 and W- 4) . The rest documents as proved on behalf of the petitioner are the photo copy of the charge- sheet dtd. 8/9-5-91and enquiry into the charge - sheet as perletter dtd. 16-5-91 issued against the workman ( Ext. W- 5 and W- 6 respectively) . Whereas a copy of the discharge certificatedtd. 23-12-91 under the signature of M.Ο. concerned ( Ext . W- 7 ) which was issued to the workman after the treatment of his Liver Cirrohosis but in good condition .

On the perusal of the materials available on the case records, I find that WW- 1Pradeep Kumar Paswan as the Assistant Secretary to the Union concerned has stated thatworkman Kedar Bhuia , Ex- Miner Loader had died in harness on 8-1-1992 and thereafter his widow petitioner Smt . Sugia Bhuini had represented for her employment on 9-3-92 ( Ext . W- 2) through the Project Officer concerned , who had forwarded it to the Area Office of the G.M. , who also forwarded it with the recommendation to the Headquarters . But her representation for her employment was regretted, though the petitioner received all the claims under Life Coverage Scheme . Further statement of the Witness ( WW- 1 ) is that the Management prior to the death ofworkman had issued a chargesheet to him and notice of enquiry was also issued but during the pendency of the enquiry, he died and accordingly the copies of the documents ( Ext . W- 1 to W- 7) have beeb submitted in behalf ofthe petitioner in support of the claim. According to the witness , admittedly deceased workman did not attend to hisduty since 16-4-87 till the date ofhis death .

9. Mr. B.B. Pandey, the Ld . Advocate for the Union has submitted that the Management has taken the plea about the workman that he was not on the roll of the company but no such reason was communicated to the petitioner widow of the workman in its aforesaid regretful letters(Ext . W-3 and W- 4) , likewise the management did not produce any document to that effect , thus the claim of thepetitioner for her employment is quite justified. On the other hand Mr. D.K. Verma , the Ld . Advocate for the management has the contention that the admission about the workman to have submitted his resignation prior to his service on account of his ill health which was not accepted by the management as para - 6 of the W.S. of the petitioner, as such according to C.S.O. Clause 17.8 , an employee loses his lien if he remains absent for 10 days continuously so the employee was no longer in service as the claim of the petitioner is not sustainable under C.S.O. Clause 9.3.2 .

10. On the consideration of the aforesaid facts and circumstances , I find that the petitioner has merits for her employment in place of premature death of her husband workman ex - Miner Loader Kedar Bhuia who died in harness and she had properly represented before the management for it, as the ex- workman was an employee as Miner Loader under the management . Therefore , it is held that the action of the management of Katras Project of M/s. BCCL in denying employment to petitioner Smt. Sugia Bhuini , the dependent wife of late Kedar Bhuia the Ex- Miner/Loader who expired on 8-1-1992 is not legally justified . Hence , the petitioner Sugia Bhuini as his dependent wife is entitled to employment in place of her deceased aforesaid husband workman .

The managernent is directed to implement the Award within one month from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India .

7. On the other hand , the testimony ofMW- 1Dipak Kumar Viswakarma , the Legal Assistant is that workinan Kedar Bhuia the Miner / Loader posted at Katrasgarh Area started to absent since 15-4-87 for which he was issued charge-sheet after three years and the managerment decided to hold the Demestic enquiry against hin and accordingly the Enquiry Officer as appointed by the Disciplinary Authority after the completion of the domestic enquiry submitted the enquiry report against the workman. Further the management witness has alleged that during that period the concerned workman had submitted his resignation from service which was accepted by the management and the workman died on 8-1-92 . But unfortunately the witness ( MW- 1 ) could not substantiate with any such document about the alleged resignation of theworkman or the acceptance of it be management, rather it is an admitted fact that petitioner Sugia Bhuini who was paid all the dues of the workman , had submitted an application for her employment after the death of her said husband.

KISHORI RAM, PresidingOfficer 2GI/12-15 378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14. 2012/ PAUSA 24 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 19 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 163. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार हाड़ोती क्षेत्रीय ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जयुपर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था । सं. एल-12012/72/2006- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th December. 2011 S.O. 163. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 9/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Jaipur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Hadoti Kshetriya Gramin Bank , and their workman, received by the Central Government on 14-12-2011 .

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] प्रावधानों के अन्तर्गत उक्त निर्देश के जरिए न्यायनिर्णयन हेतु प्रेषित किया गया था ।

"Whether the workman Shri Ramcharan S/ o Sh . Surajmal has worked more than 240 days in a year in the Bank . If yes , whether the action of termination the service of the workman by the Manager , Hadoti Kshetriya Gramin Bank Branch, Nayapura , Kora w.e.f. 02-01-2006 is legal and justified ? If not, whatreliefthe employee is entitled to and from whi date?"

[No. L-12012722006-10-0

RAMESH SINGH De koer

अनुबंध

केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय ,

जयपुर

सी.जी.आई.टी. प्रकरण सं. 09/2007

श्री एन. के. पुरोहित , पीठासीन अधिकारी विज्ञप्ति सं . ( रेफरेन्स नं L- 12012/72/2006 -IR ( B - I ) दिनांक: 22-01-2007 Shri Ramcharan So. Sh. Surajmal Through Secretary, Chambai Karamchari Union , 2-J -3 . Teachers Colony, Keshavpura , Kota (Rajasthan )

V/ s

The Branch Manager, Hadoti Kshetriya Gramin Bank , Nayapura , Kota ( Rajasthan )

: एक- पक्षीय कार्यवाही प्राथी की तरफ से अप्रार्थी की तरफ से

: श्री ओम प्रकाश जैन

पंचाट

प्रार्थी के स्टेटमेन्ट ऑफ क्लेम में अभिवचन है कि उसे अप्रा बैंक द्वारा लगभग 15 वर्ष पूर्व अप्राथों बैंक की कोटा शाखा में सफाई- कर्मचारी के रूप में नियोजित किया गया था । उससे पूरे समय कार्य लिया जाता था लेकिन भुगतान अंशकालीन श्रमिक के हिसाब से मात्र 100 रुपये माह दिया जाता था । लेकिन अप्रार्थी बैंक ने दिनांक 02-01-2006 को अधिनियम की धारा 25 F के प्रावधान की अवहेलना करते हुए बिना कोई नोटिस या छटनी का मुआवजा अदा किए सेवा से पृथक कर दिया गया । प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी के यहां कार्यरत रहने के दौरान प्रत्येक कैलेण्डर वर्ष में 240 दिन से अधिक कार्य किया है । प्रार्थी ने यह भी अभिकथित किया है कि सेवा से पृथक किए जाने से समय वरिष्ठता सूची का प्रकाशन नहीं किया तथा उसे पुनः सेवा का अवसर दिए बिना अन्य श्रमिकगण प्रेमचन्द एवं शोकत को लाड़पुरा शाखा में नियुक्ति दी गई है तथा श्रमिक श्री शम्भूको स्थाई किया गया है । इस प्रकार अधिनियम की धारा 25 F एवं G का उल्लंघन किया है । अतः प्रार्थी को सेवा से पृथक किए जाने की तिथि से निरन्तर सेवा में मानते हुए समस्त देय लाभ दिलवाए जाने हेतु प्रार्थना की है । 3. अप्रार्थी ने वलेम को अस्वीकार करते हुए कहा है कि उसे बैंक की सेवा में कभी नियोजित नहीं किया गया तथा उसे अप्रार्थी बैंक परिसर में स्थित शौचालय की सफाई के रूप में 100 रुपये प्रतिमाह भुगतान किया जाता था तथा सफाई का कार्य वह स्वयं अथवा अपने परिवार के सदस्य या अपने प्रतिनिधि से करवाता था । उसे उक्त 100 रुपये की राशि वेतन के रूप में नहीं दी जाती थी । अप्रार्थी के अभिवचन है कि प्रार्थी ने मई 2005 के बाद स्त्रयं ही काम छोड़ दिया था । श्री प्रेमचन्द शोकन व शम्भू सिंह की नियुक्ति संदेश- वाहक कम- झाडूकश के पद पर प्रधान कार्यालय द्वारा नियमानुसार की गई थी । अतः प्रार्थी का क्लेम स्वीकार किये जाने योग्य नहीं है । किया । 4. अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि को चुना गया । पत्रावली का अवलोकन 5. दिनांक 25 01-2011 को प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध एक- पक्षीय कार्यवाही किए जाने का आदेश पारित किया गया ।

दिनांक 24-11-2011

केन्द्रीय सरकार के द्वारा निम्न विवाद औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947की धारा 10 की उप धारा के खण्ड ( घ ) के 6. एक पक्षीय साक्ष्य में अप्रार्थी ने श्री विमल कुमार जेन शाखा प्रबंधक का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है तथा अपने पक्ष- कथन के समर्थन में प्राधिकारी न्यूनतम वेतन अधिनियम कोटा के आदेश निर्णय दिनांक 16-01-2010 की फोटो प्रति एवं उक्त कार्यवाही के संबंध में प्रार्थी द्वारा प्रस्तुत शपथ- पत्र एवं फरवरी 2002 से जुलाई 20004 की अवधि के कुछ भुगतान वाउचर्स की फोटो- प्रतियां प्रस्तुत की है । 379

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

13. पंचाट की प्रतिलिपि केन्द्रीय सरकार को औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 की भाग 17 ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत प्रकाशनार्थ प्रेषित की जाये ।

एन. के.पुरोहित, पीठासीन अधिकारी 7. यह सिद्ध करने का प्रारंभिक भार प्राथी पर था कि उसने दिनांक 02-01-2010 से पूर्ववर्ती 12 माह की अवधि में उसने कम से कम 240 दिन कार्य किया है इसलिए उसे धारा 25 F के प्रावधानों की पालना किए बिना सेवापृथक किया जाना अवैध एवं अनुचित था ।

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

8. प्रार्थी ने अपने अभिवचनों के समर्थन में कोई मौखिक साक्ष्य पेश नहीं की है उसके विरुद्ध एकपक्षीय कार्यवाही चली है । प्रार्थी ने क्लेम के समर्थन में सिर्फ कुछ भुगतान वाउचर्स एवं उसके द्वारा वेतन बढ़ाये जाने के सम्बन्ध में प्रेषित कुछ पत्रों की फोटो- प्रतियां प्रस्तुत की हैं ।

का.आ. 164.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध मे निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद नं. - 2, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था

[सं. एल-20012 /54/2004 - आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी.एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th December, 2011 9. अप्रार्थी के साक्षी श्री विमल कुमार जैन ने अपने शपथ-पत्र में कहा है कि प्रार्थी नयापुरा शाखा परिसर में शौचालय की सफाई हंतु कभी- कभी अपनी स्वेच्छा तथा अपनी उपलब्धता के अनुसार ही कार्य करने आता था जिसके लिए उसे 100 रुपये प्रतिमाह की दर से बैंक वाउचर से भुगतान किया जाता था जोकि वेतन की श्रेणी में नहीं आता । अप्रार्थी साक्षी का कथन है कि प्रार्थी को न कोई नियुक्ति आदेश दिया गया और न ही इस संबंध में मस्टररोल में इन्द्राज किया गया । उसका यह भी कथन है कि प्रार्थी को दिनांक 02-01-2006 से सेवा से पृथक करने का कथन असत्य है क्योंकि प्रार्थी अप्रार्थी बैंक कीसेवा में कभी रहा ही नहीं । प्रार्थी ने कभी भी एक वर्ष में 240 दिन कभी भी नयापुरा शाखा में काम नहीं किया ।

S.O. 164. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industriai Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 82/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court - 2. Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the inanagement of M/s . CCL, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government of 20-12-2011 .

[No. L -20012/54/2004- IR(C- I ) ]

D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) of the i.D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 82 of 2004 10. अप्रार्थी की ओर से प्रार्थी के द्वारा पूर्व में प्राधिकारी , न्यूनतम वेतन अधिनियम के यहां प्रस्तुत प्रार्थना-पत्र पर दिए गए निर्णय दिनांक 16-01-2010 की प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रस्तुत की है तथा इस संबंध में प्रार्थी के द्वारा शपथ- पत्र की प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि भी प्रस्तुत की है । जिनके अवलोकन से यह प्रगट होता है कि प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी के यहां मई 2005 तक ही कार्य करने की बात कही है । उक्त निर्णय में भी कहा गया है कि उसने मई 2005 तक ही कार्य किया है । अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रस्तुत मौखिक एवं दस्तावेजी साक्ष्य से यह प्रगट होता है किप्रार्थी ने दिनांक02-01-2006 से पूर्ववर्ती 12 माह की अवधि में 240 दिन कार्य नहीं किया है । इसके खण्डन में प्रार्थी की साक्ष्य नहीं है । अतः प्रार्थी के मामले में धारा 25 F औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के प्रावधान लागू नहीं होते ।

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/ s . CCL and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

: Onbehalf of the workman None

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate 11. प्रार्थी को सिद्ध करना था कि उसे हटाए जाने के बाद अप्रार्थी ने अन्य श्रमिकगण को धारा 25 H के प्रावधानों के विपरीत नियोजन दिया है । लेकिन इस संबंध में प्रार्थी ने कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं की है जबकि अप्रार्थी साक्षी का कथन है कि जिन लोगों को नियुक्तिदी गई है वह नियमानुसार प्रधान कार्यालय के द्वारा दी गई है । अतः प्रार्थी धारा 25 H के प्रावधानों के अभिकथित उल्लंघन को भी साबित करने में असफल रहा है ।

Industry: Coal

State : Jharkhand

Dated , Dhanbad, the 8th December , 2011

ORDER

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 12. उक्त निष्कर्षों के आधार पर यह अभिनिर्धारित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी ने दिनांक 02-01-2006 से पूर्ववर्ती 12 माह की अवधि में 240 दिन कार्य नहीं किया है तथा उक्त तिथि को प्रार्थी रामचरण के सेवामुक्ति का अप्रार्थी का कथित कृत्य अनुचित एवं अवैध नहीं है । न्यायनिर्णयन हेतु निर्देश का उत्तर उक्त प्रकार दिया जाता है । पंचाट तदनुसार पारित किया जाता है । 380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/54/2004- IR- (C-I) dated, 28-06-04.

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. BCCL, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government of 20-12-2011 , SCHEDULE

[No. L-20012/278/2004- IR( C-I ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL( No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer "Whether the demand ofthe Coalfield Lobour Union from the management of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/s . C.C.L. P.O. Bhurkunda, Distt. Hazaribagh for correction ofdate of birth Sri Suresh Singh Munshi as per the certificate issued by Bihar Vidyalaya Pariksha Samittee is proper and justified? If so , to what relief isthe concerned workman entitled ?"

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 Reference No. 62 of 2005

PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Amlabad Colliery of M/ s . BCCL and their workman

2. None represented the Union concerned nor workman Suresh Singh Munshi present nor workman witness produced for evidence despite registered notices including show cause dt. 13-2-08 , 21-10-10, 21-12-10 and 16-3-2010. But Mr. D.K. Verma, the Ld . Advocate for the management is present.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf ofthe workman

Onbehalf of the employers

None Mr. U. N. Lal, Advocate

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated , Dhanbad , the7th December , 2011 ORDER

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/278/2004- IR- (C- I ) dated, 2nd June, 2005.

3. Perused the case record, I find that the case has been pending for the evidence of the workman since 17-8-2006 but not a single witness produced on behalf of the representative Union. The present reference case relates to the matter for the correction of the date ofbirth of the workman Suresh Singh Minshi as per the certificate issued by Vihar Vidyalaya ,' a iksha Samity but the conduct ofthe representative Union as well as the workman clearly indicates their disinterestedness to contest the case . Proceeding with the case for uncertain period of time is wastage of time and energy of the Tribunal in vain. Therefore the case is clossed and accordingly order is passed.

SCHEDULE

KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 20 दिसम्बर, 2011

"Whether the demand of the Coal Mines Piece Rated Workers Association from the management of BCCL , Amlabad Colliery to regularise Sh. Nakul Singh as on setter is justified ? If so, to what relief is the workman entitled and from what date ? " का.आ. 165.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बी. सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजको और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , धनबाद नं. -2, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 62/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/278/2004- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी.एस.एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th December , 2011

2.None represented the Union for workman Nakul Singh nor workman witness produced despite afresh registered noticedt. 28-9-2011 addressed to the President of the Union concerned as noted in the reference, for production ofwork witness . But Mr. U.N. Lal , Ld. Advocate for the management is present . On perusal of the case reccord I find the case of the year 2005 pending for the evidence ofworkman since 9-8-2006 and since then despite registered notices including show cause one not a single witness produced on behalf of the Union for the workman. The reference relates to the matter of regularisation of the workman Nakul Singh as on Setter as raised by the Union, but the very canduct of the Union representative as well as the workman clearly indicates their unwillingness to persue the case seriously. It is the oldest case of the year 2005. Hence , the case is closed in this circumstances and accordingly order is passed .

S.O. 165.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 197), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 62/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribut al-cum- Labour Court-2, Dhanbad, as shown in the A 1nexure in the

KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer 381 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

Saw, E.P.G.H.Gr. ' E ' to the post of E.P. Fitter Gr . III/D is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? " का.आ. 6. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2.None represented the Union concerned nor workman Gendu Saw present nor any witness for the evidence on behalf of the workman produced despite the registered notices including show cause dt . 20-10-2010 , 6-4-2011 , 21-10-2011 addressed to the Secretary of the Union concerned . Mr. D.K. Verma, the Ld . Advocate for the management is present .

[सं. एल-20012/6/2005- आई आर ( सी-1) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th December, 2011

S.O. 166. - In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 72/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court - 2 , Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M /s . CCL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20-12-2011 .

[No. L-20012/6/2005 - IR (C- I ) ]

3. Perused the case record . I find the case has been pending since 6-9-11 for evidence of the workman . But despite registered notice and last chance no witness produced by the workman . The present case relates to the matter ofthe promotion of the workman , E.P.G. H.Grade-D tothe post of E.P. FitterGr. III/ D . From the conduct ofthe Union as well as the workman it stands clear that they are not interested to persue the case for proper adjudication . Under the circumstances proceeding with the case for uncertainty is futile and wastage of time and energy of the Tribunal . Hence , the case is closed and accordingly order is passed.

D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL( No. 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10

(1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947

का.आ. 167.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 80/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Reference No. 72 of 2005

[सं. एल-12012/165/2008- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th December , 2011 PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Kathara Colliery of M / s . CCL and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : None

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate

Industry: Coal

State : Jharkhand

Dated, Dhanbad , the 7th December, 2011

S.O. 167. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 80/ 2009) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court - 2 , Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 20-12-2011.

ORDER

[No. L- 12012/165/2008 - IR ( B - I ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1)(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/6/2005 - IR (C - I ) dated the 19th July, 2005

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

SCHEDULE

Friday, the 2nd December, 2011

Present : A.N. Janardanan PresidingOfficer

"Whether the demand of the Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh from the management of Kathara Colliery of M/ s . CCL for promotion of Shri Gendu 382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

PART 11-SEC. 3 ( 11 ) ) Industrial Dispute No. 80/2009

wisap priate and when it was enquired by her ne deposited a cheque for 350 in her account .

SecondCharge

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 οἱ 1947), between theManagement of State Bank of India ari their Workman].

BETWEEN

The charge is u ar be workınan had diverted the credit relating to certain customers to the accounts of friends/relatives on 13 occasions which the workmar. admitted to the ture ofRs . 44,570 and repaid to the bank The General Secretary :

1stParty Petitions Unior

Third Charge

State Bank of India Ambedkar

The charge is at ne norrowed from outside withou . the knowledge of the bank.

Trade Union No. 635, Ranaiammaiyar Street , Periyar Nagar , Chennai -600039

Vs.

The ChiefGeneral Manager and Party/Respondent

State Bank of India

Local Head Office Chennai -600006

APPEARANCE :

For the 1st Party/Petitioner : M/ s . Balan Haridas, Advocates

For the 2nd Party/Management:

Sri V. R. Gopalarathnam

Advocate

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12012 / 165//2008 - IR (B - 1 ) dated 27-8-2009 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this i'ribunal foradjudication..

The schedule mentioned in that orderis :

"Whether action of the management of State Bank of India in awarding punishment of bringing down to lower stage in the time scale of pay by 2 stages for 12 years with cumulative effect in respect of Sri I. Thangavelu , is justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman concerned entitled?"

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 80/2009 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their Claim and Counter Statement as the case may be .

3. The averments in the Claim Statement briefly read asfollows:

The workman , I. Thangavelu working under the Respondent/ Bank since 20-12-1980 was on 21-12-2001 was suspended . Afterwards a Charge Memo dated 11-2-2004 was issued to him framing 3 charges to which he gave an explanation denying the charges . A domestic enquiry was ordered . The details of the charges are as below:

Firstcharge

The charge is that the workman had credited Rs. 3,000 in respect of SB A/ c Holder Mrs. B. Alderson in the account of one M. Sukumaran in order to

4. The charges v not proved in the enquiry. E was working as Cled clearing seat in the Chenn... MainBranch . The procedure adopted in respect of deposit of cheques follows . Customer deposits his cheques withduly filled in pay- in- slip. As the Clerk in the clearing seat workman receives the cheques and pay - in - slip and give the counterfoil initialed by him to the customer . Ther he enters the particulars ofthe cheque viz.. cheque number . name of the bank , armourt, name of the customer and bas account number in the che " ing scroll , which is written with two copies. The filled roll and the cheques with pay- in-slip are then handed overto the Head Clerk who verties all the particulars where aficr hardover to the Personal Banking Division Officer who retains one copy of the scroll . The Personal Banking Division Officer again checks the scroll and pay- in -slips and cheques . Thereafñet PBD Officer will send the scroll ( two copies ) , pay - in rrips and cheques to clearingdepartment where is retained one copy of the scroll and pay - ir - slips in lock and key and send one copy ofthe scro!! with cheques to Reserve Bank of India . On the cheques so sent for realiz tion, after being realized, which is usually on the third day the clearing department will issue the pay- in - slipsto the Deputy Manager who issues the pay- in - slips to the Officer - in- charge in the SB /Current Account Counter-in- Charge as the case may be . The Counter in- Charge Officer then will give the pay- in- slips to the concerned computer operator fe, giving credit entry/ posting the amount as per the pay - in - slip in the concerned account , where after the Counter in- charge Officer hasto give " Yes " to the entry made by the Computer Operator and only then the credit entry will reach the concerned account . It is evident that the work of the workman is over from the moment he makes the entry in the scroll and hand over the pay - in - slips and cheques to the Head Clerk. The Enquiry Officer in a pre -determined mind held the charges asproved. Finding on the first charge is perverse without any legal evidence . The substance of the first charge is that the workman had obtained cheque dated 8-8-2001 withoutpayee's name from M/ s . Kumaran Travels and filled in the payee's name as B. Alderson and credited to the account of B. Alderson . The charge is utter falsehood. The workman as Clerk in the clearing cannot credit any cheque to any account . Credit will be given there after by the concerned Computer Operaior . For any wrong credit he cannot be held responsible . There was no evidence placed 383 [ भाग !! - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) !

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

within the limits . His wife also draws a monthly income of Rs . 9,000 . All the loans have been repaid. So they were not in excess of his capacity and were prior to the circular dated 5-1-2004 prescribing condition to get permission for outside borrowing . Holding the charge as proved is perverse. Despite all these the finding was acceptedby the Disciplinary Authority and punishment was imposed which is harsh. Appeal was dismissed for reasons contrary to evidence , thus being perverse and illegal . Punishment is grossly disproportionate causing loss of considerable sum to theworkman . The punishment is to be set aside restoring hispay- scale with all benefits .

5. Counter Statement allegations briefly read as follows:

The dispute being only individual dispute and not Industrial Dispute there is no locus -standi to the petitioner. The employee while in Clearing Section committed misconducts for which he was suspended on 20-12-2001 and was thereafter charge sheeted on 11-12-2004 containing 3 charges . Enquiry was held following the principles of natural justice and as per the service conditions in which Thangavelu was given full opportunity with representative. There were three witnesses and 29 exhibits on the side of the bank and one witness and 5 exhibits on the other side . It is denied that charges are not correct and not proved. Finding is after analyzing the evidence correctly. Thangavelu had accepted the Second Charge before the Officer who conducted investigation and remitted the amount. It is denied that Thangavelu remitted the amount under threat of Police Complaint which is an afterthought to wriggle out of the situation . The payment was voluntary and quick in succession after giving confession before the Investigation Officer. Finding is not perverse but is based on legal evidence . Punishment is not harsh or disproportionate to the gravity ofthe offence . Enquiry was fair,just and proper observing principles of natural justice . That punishment imposed will have a bearing on the terminal benefits cannot be a ground for granting the relief. Claim is to be dismissed .

6. Points for consideration are :

( i) Whether the punishment of bringing down to lower stage in the time scale of pay by two stages for 12 years with cumulative effect in respect of Sri Thangavelu isjustified?

(ii) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?

7. Evidence consists of Ex . W1 to Ex . W35 on the petitioner's side and Ex . M1 to Ex . M5 on the Management's side , both sets marked on consent with no evidence adduced on either side .

Points ( i ) & ( ii)

8.Heard and perused the written arguments on both sides and the records and documents . It is argued on behalf ofthe petitioner that the charges are not correct and that to show that payee's name was written by the workman . Mrs Alderson did not complain that the cheque of M/ s . Kumaran Travels does not belong to her. No material was placed to show that the cheque was deposited by the workman . The relevant pay-in - slip requested for by the workman was not furnished with a view to hide the fact that the cheque in question was deposited by Alderson berself. No complaint from Mrs Alderson alleging wrong enry or that cheque of Kumaran Travels was not intended to her She had not been examined offering any reason . the cheque or pay - in - slip were not produced in the enquiry. There is no evidence to show that on 31-7-2000 Alderson presented the cheque . No material was there to show that the cheque of M/ s . Kumaran Travels was in replacement of the cheque said to have been presented on 31-7-2000. Owner of Kumaran Travels was not examined in the enquiry nor any statement of him was obtained. There was no material to show that the cheque was obtained without writing payee's name . An unsigned statement prepared by the Chief Manager said to have been given by the owner of ine Traveis produced in the enquiry cannot be relied upon . A statement was prepared alleged to be written on the basis what the workman told to the officials ofthe bank to know about Kumaran Travels as mentioned by the Enquiry Officer . PW2, Sri J. Sivaprakasam in the cross- examination mentioned that the statement was written by 1.0. Murthy. The alleged statement of workman is fabricated. in re - examination after being ably tutored Sivaprakasam Purther deposed turning around as it Krishna Kumar only recorded the statement . The Enquiry Officer, not the Enquiry Officer who conducted the proceedings by misreading the evidence and by surmises and conjectures held first charge as proved without legal evidence . Regarding Second Charge which was also not proved in the enquiry as in the case of the First Charge all the 13 cheques in question have been dealt with in commencement by the workman . The said 13 cheques and the pay- in- slips were not presented in the enquiry. Particulars about the customer and the account number, who deposited the cheques , etc. were not furnished. There was no material to show that workman only diverted the credits relating to other customers There was no evidence to show that N. Sukumaran and M. Rajendran are friends of the workman . Hey were not examined in the enquiry. The Enquiry Officer head the workman guilty of Second Charge on the basis as the workman was in need of funds by citing the Third age. A mere taking of loan within the limit cannot be reason for holding the second charge as proved . Faqtay Officer has relied upon payment of ks 43.570 as reason for holding guilty of the First and Second Charge . This payment was obtained from the workman under the threat of Police Complaint by detaining him in the Bank for several hours in the name of interrogation Mere remittance of the amount by him has nooping to do with the charges . The amount is in Suspense Account. The borrowings mentioned as Third Charge are 384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] they were not proved in the enquiry. The finding is perverse without any legal evidence or basis . If anything has gone wrong while giving credits to the account the workman cannot be held responsible because his role as a Clerk in the Clearing Seat is over from the moment he makes entry in the scroll and hand over the pay- in- slips and cheques to the Head Clerk. There is no evidence that the payee's name in the cheque for Rs . 3,000 was written by the workman or that the cheque of M/ s . Kumaran Travels was deposited by him in the account of Mrs. Alderson . The pay- in - slips though requested for by the workman were not furnished in the enquiry. There is no complaint from the Customer, Alderson alleging wrong entries in her account . She is not examined as witness . The cheque for Rs . 3,000 was also not produced in the enquiry. The owner of Kumaran Travels was not examined nor any statement was produced . The unsigned statement said to be of owner of Kumaran Travels cannot be relied upon . The workman did not give a statement on 15-12-2001 as could be found that the same does not contain his signature . The same is an unsigned statement in the handwriting of Chief Manager , Sri K. Krishnakumar. But according to PW2 , Sri J. Sivaprakasam the statement was written by 1.0 . Murthy . Hence Sivaprakasam was not present at the time of the statement and the same is fabricated . Again in re -examination Sivaprakasam turned around and stated Krishnakumar recorded the statement demonstrating falsity of the charge to fix the petitioner by hook or crook . Further arguments were also advanced in terms of the Claim Statement .

not containing the latter's signature . There is no enmity for them towards Thangavelu . PWI has admitted having written the deposition . Under PEX. 16 clearing scroll dated 12-9-2001 there is one Rs . 3,000 drawn on Union Bank of India credited to SB A/ c of Sri Rajendran with no corresponding entry for credit to the account of Smt. Alderson whereas the credit was released on 14-9-2001 to the account of Smt. Alderson . The workman himself admitted having made the wrong credits to Sukumaran's accounts due to heavy routine work , but disowning liability alleging nothing mala fide in it. Thangavelu did not object his confession statement that he was intimidated to pay the amount . Only by 14-3-2002 by EX. W3 he does so . Ex. PEX . 27 , Ex . PEX . 4 and Ex . PEX. 26 show petitioner to have diverted the credits to Sukumaran's account . It could be seen that overdraft of Thangavelu was overdrawn on most of the days . Ex . PEX 3 letter of Niranjan Kumar shows nexus between him and Thangavelu . Ex. PX3 shows his Uncle Thangavelu to have had caused the wrong credit by diversion . The parking of funds in the accounts of Seeniammal and Rani is also attributable to the workman as evident from his statement . Thatunder Police threat he was remitting the amount is not true . The fact that the 13 credit vouchers are not traceable and are not forthcoming could obviously for the reason that the wrong doer ensured the vouchers not to be available for later scrutiny who is benefited by them . The employee was in need of money and he resorted to outside borrowings . There is nothing to challenge the enquiry, finding or the punishment imposed . The same is not to be interfered with, the counsel sums up the arguments .

9. Contra arguments are that the charges are proved based on oral and documentary evidence coupled with circumstantial evidence . PW1 and PW2 proved the statement given by the workman before the Investigating Officer on 15-12-2001 . The statement is admissible . Ex. PEX7 - Collection Scroll proves tendering of cheque for Rs . 3,000 by Mrs. B. Alderson , which as per Ex . PEX8 shows no corresponding credit till 14-9-2001 though the amount is to be credited on the same date . Ex . PEX9 shows credit of Rs . 3,000 in the account of Sukumaran further proved from Ex . PEX. 10 whereas Ex . PX16 on 31-7-2001 does not reveal presentation of cheque of Rs . 3,000 to be so credited indicating the same as an extraneous credit not pertaining to Sukumaran's account . As per Ex . PEX4 letter of Sukumaran the extraneous credit is admitted by him . The information regarding the extraneous credit as mentioned by Sukumaran was from Thangavelu indicating petitioner to have had prior knowledge about the said credit. Ex . PEX5 dated 12-7-2002 indicates Thangavelu to have had obtained cheque from Kumaran Travels without mentioning the payee's name, to which Krishnakumar was a witness wherein name of payee was filled- up and the credit voucher for Rs . 3,000 dated 14-1-2001 . Ex . PEX17 in the name of Alderson is in the hand of Thangavelu . Only from Ex. PEXI deposition of Thangavelu LHO official came to know of M/s . Kumaran Travels. PW1 and PW2 bank employees are witnesses to Ex. PEX1 deposition of Thangavelu though

10. On an anxious consideration of the whole ofthe materials I am justified in holding that the enquiry , the finding and the punishment imposed are only to be kept intact . There is logically probative material in arriving at the conclusion reached by the Enquiry Officer, in the enquiry held in just and proper manner. Though some materials tend to be hearsay there is no allergy to the same provided there is reasonable nexus and credibility. The various materials of that description could be found to have reasonable connectivity and credibility as could be seen from oral and documentary evidence . The circular dated 5-1-2004 prescribing condition to get permission for outside borrowing is not produced to substantiate the argument of the petitioner that the same is not applicable to the specific instance of his personal borrowing. This aspect is only mentioned in the pleading . The confession statement of the petitioner though challenged as being tainted as an outcome of threat of Police complaint cannot be found to be one so obtained by way of threat . It appears voluntary and natural emanating from a man who is really guilty of such misconducts and from his own mouth in a natural and logical sequence . They come in so much details and that it flows naturally regarding events that actually transpired . Itisintrinsically and inherently discernible as unfolding of nothing short of actual events not out of the impact of any 385

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

coercion or foreboding of something untoward happening to the maker extraneously other than from the authority before whom it was being made , if such a confession is not made . Having regard to the contents of the confession and the logical sequence in which they come out it could be found that it is not the workman speaking the facts but it is the facts finding their actual expression through the words ofthe workman in its true , natural and logical form without there being anything strange or alien by way of embellishments , additions or denial of any material deviating from the true facts. In the Industrial adjudications the question is not whether there has been no sufficient evidence to warrant the finding . It is whether there is some evidenceto warrant such a finding . Any material logically probative to a prudent mind is reliable to enter a finding. There is no taboo even to hearsay evidence as already mentioned above . With some evidence of a conclusive nature corroborated by circumstantial evidence the finding has been arrived at which is not at all open to challenge. Same is the case with the punishment also in which there is no scope for interference as being disproportionate to the gravity of the offence under Section 11A of ID Act, 1947 . In fact the Management has been magnanimous in meting out a lenient treatment with the workman . That the gravity ofthe punishment may adversely affect his superannuation benefits is an alien consideration to influence interference with the punishment . Therefore the action of the Management is justified and the petitioner is not entitled toanyrelief.

11. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictatedto the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 2nd December, 2011 )

A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined

For the 1st Party/Petitioner Union None

None For the 2nd Party/Management :

Documents Marked

On the Petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

20-12-2001 Order of Suspension

EX.WI

8-12-2002 Charge Memo

Ex.W2

Ex.W3

Reply to the Charge Memo 4-03-2002

16-06-2003

EX.W4

Second Charge Memo for the same charge

EX.W5 17-07-2003 Reply to the Second Charge Memo

11-02-2004

EX.W6

Third Charge Memo for the same charge

Reply to the 3rd Charge Memo 10-3-2004

EX.W7

Order for Disciplinar, Enquiry Ex.W8 10-03-2004

2GI/12-16

Reply to the Enquiry Notice 13-03-2004

EX.W9

Intimation regarding the enquiry Ex.W10 27-03-2004

Reply to that intimation 2-4-2004

Ex.W11

Ex.W12 7-4-2004 Representation given by the petitioner

EX.W13 30-7-2004 Letter sent by the DR to Disciplinary Authority

Ex.W14 30-7-2004 Defence brief submitted by the DR

15-12-2004 Letter from the Respondent EX.W15

15-02-2004 Letter from the Respondent EX.W16

20-12-2004 Reply to that letter

Ex.W17

4-1-2005 Letter from the Respondent Ex.W18

13-1-2005 Reply given by the petitioner EX.W19

12-2-2005 Reply from the Respondent Ex.W20

Ex.W21 15-2-2005 Letter from the 2nd Enquiry Officer

EX.W22 2-4-2005 Letter from the management alongwith enquiry report EX.W23 10-4-2005 Letter sent by the petitioner EX.W24 13-4-2005 Letter issued by the petitioner counsel

Ex.W25 15-4-2005 Letter from the Management 18-4-2005

Ex.W26

Letter issued by the petitioner counsel alongwith the copy of the order in WP: 12183 of 2005 Ex.W27

Prosecution brief submitted by the Respondent

Comments to the enquiry report EX.W28 26-4-2005

6-10-2005

EX.W29

enquiry report Additional comments to the Ex.W30 28-11-2005 Letter from the Disciplinary Authority with proposed punishment

Ex.W31 8-12-2005 Letter given by the petitioner during the personal hearing

Order of reinstatement Ex.W32 29-12-2005

EX.W33 29-12-2005 Order of the Disciplinary Authority

Ex.W34 3-02-2006 Appealagainst the order dated 29-12-2005

Order of the Appellate Authority.

Ex.W 35 21-04-2006

On the Management's side

Date

Description

Ex. No.

12-9-2005

Ex. M1

Copy of order of High Court at Madras in W.P. 12183/05 386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

9-1-90, with the following schedule:-

Ex. M2 15-12-2001 Statement made by Thangavelu before Investigating Officiai

Ex. M3 4-3-2002 Letter of Thangavelu to The ChiefManager, Chennai Main Branch

Ex . M 4 Enquiry Proceedings

"Whether the action of the management of Ghuggus Colliery of M/ s. WCL in terminating services of Shri Chandrayya , Shot Firer ofNakoda Incline w.e.f. 1-6-1982 is justified? If not , to what reliefthe workman concerned is entitled ?" Ex.M 5 Minutes of proceedings in enquiry.

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

2. On receipt of the reference , the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the workman , Shri Sopar Chandrayya , ("the workman " in short ) filed his statement ofclaim and the management of the WCL (" Party No. i " in short) filed its written statement .

का.आ. 168.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सो. एल. के प्रबंधतत्र के सबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के नीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में बोन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 101-2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2001 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/107/89-आई आर ( सी- II) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 20th December, 2011

S.O. 168. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industriai Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No : 01/ 2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- com- Labeur Cour, Nagpur as shown in the Aunexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in recoiton to the managerment of WCL and their workman , wirich was received by the Central Government on 20-12-2011 .

[ F. No. L-22012/107/89- IR (C- II )] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT/ NGP/ 101 /2004

Date :9-12-2011

Party No. 1 : The Sub Area Manager, Ghuggus Sub Area of WCL PO: Ghuggus , Distt. Chandrapur (MS) Versus

The case of the workman is that since May 1971, he was working as a permanent Shot Firer in Nakoda Incline No. 3 ofGhuggus Colliery and on 16-11-1981 , he had gone to the forest to bring wood for repairing of his house , but while he was returning from the forest, on the way on the river bank, the bullock cart capsized , as a result ofwhich, hisright hand came under the cart and the wood loaded on the same and was broken and he was taken to the Government Hospital , Chandrapur by his family members and some villagers and during the treatment , his right hand was amputed and he underwent treatment in the Government Hospital , Chandrapur from 16-11-1981 to 28-11-1981 and he was discharged from the hospital with the advise to take rest for one month and thereafter, he met the Manager of Ghuggus Colliery, but he was not allowed any duty and neither he was intimated the reason for the same nor any charge sheet was submitted against him and at last, he was intimated by the management that his services had already been terminated . The further case of the workman is that as he was a permanent employee , without any show cause or charge sheet and without any departmental enquiry, his services should not have been terminated and the management of the colliery willfully violated the Certified Standing Orders and also the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act , which is completely illegal . The workman has prayed for setting aside the order oftermination and to reinstate him in service with continuity and full back wages .

PartyNo. 2 : Shri Soper Chandrayya , Shot Firer C/o . Habib Patel, Nakoda Incline No. 3 Ghuggus Sub Area, Distt . Chandrapur (M.S.)-442909

AWARD

(Dated: 9th December , 2011 )

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short) , the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of WCL and Shri Soper Chandrayya, for adjudication. as per letter No. L-22012/ 107/89 - IR ( B - II ) dated

3. The party No. I in its written statement has pleaded inter- alia that the workman, who was working as a Shot Firer in Nakoda Incline remained absent without leave or permissionfrom 16-11-1981 and therefore , he was issued with a charge sheet on 8-12-1981 and the workman submitted his reply to the charge sheet , but the same was found unsatisfactory and the workman in his reply admitted aboutthe fact of remaining absent without leave and using explosive without permission and a Shot Firer, when remains absent without leave , the production and working of the colliery suffers adversely and the workman during the enquiry admitted the charges and about losing his right hand due to the explosive accident outside and use of explosive without permission of the competent authority and he was unable to explain the source of explosive, which [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

he used for hunting wild pig and due to his admission of hisincapability of performing duty of Shot Firer by letter dated 1-6-1982 , he was informed that his services would stand automatically terminated from 1-6-1982 with reasons for the same and the workman accepting the position, did not make any demand for employment and he was fully aware ofthe fact that he was physically incapable ofdoing the work for which he was employed . The further case of party no. 1 is that a highly belated dispute was raised by the workman after several years and it was greatly prejudiced in defending the case because of the delay of seven years in raising the dispute and the services of the workman was terminated after due and proper enquiry and the workman admitted the misconduct and if it is held that the enquiry was not proper and legal , the management be permitted to lead evidence. The party no . 1 has also pleaded that the workman is not entitled to the relief of reinstatement , as he is physically unfit to hold the post of Shot Firer and as the reference is highly belated, the question ofgiving any relief from the date of termination till the date of reference also doesn't arise and the workman is not entitled for any relief.

4. Itisnecessary to mention here that the validity of the departmental enquiry was taken into consideration as a preliminary issue and as per order dated 19-6-2009 , it was held that the departmental enquiry is vitiated and the party No. 1was directed to prove the charge before this Tribunal by adducing evidence . It is also necessary to mention here that the management filed an application to take the evidence already adduced at the time of considering the validity of departmental enquiry as evidence on merit.

5. Perused the pleadings of the parties and the evidence adduced , both oral and documentary including theevidence of J.R. Sharma, the witness for the management and also considered the arguments advanced by the parties. In his evidence , J. R. Sharma has stated that the workman remained absent unauthorisedly w.e.f. 16-1-1981 and for that a show cause notice was issued to him asking to show cause as to why he should not be treated as deserter and another letter dated 18-3-1982 , Ext . M - 1 was issued by him , asking the workman to submit his explanation regarding his absence and the workman submitted his reply vide Ext. M-2 , which was received by him on 25-3-1982 and in that letter, the workman had admitted that while using explosive in the forest , the explosive exploded , as a result of which he lost his right hand and he forwarded the explanation of the workman to the Sub Area Manager and the Sub Area Manager asked him to look into the matter on the ground of the workman handling explosive in violation of the Indian Explosive Act and on the basis of such direction, he conducted an enquiry and the workman admitted that he lost his hand in an outside explosive accident . However , in the cross- examination, he has admitted that he did not verify as to whether Ext M-2 had the LTI of the workman or not . The

387

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

evidence of the witness for the management , who has no personal knowledge as to how the right hand of the workman was amputed doesn't prove that the right hand of the workman was amputed due to any explosion . Management has failed to produce the original explanation submitted by the workman . Management has also not produce any document regarding the enquiry made by the witness for the management and that in the enquiry, the workman admitted about amputation of his right hand due to any explosion .

It is clear from the materials on record that the workman was prevented by sufficient cause from remaining absent from duty w.e.f. 16-11-1981 . Hence , it is found that management has failed to prove the charge ofunauthorized absence against the workman . In view of the failure of the management to prove the charge against the workman, the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service .

Itisadmittedbythe workman himself in his evidence that to work as a Shot Firer, both hands are required and due to amputation of his right hand , he cannot work as a Shot Firer . In view of such facts , the workman cannot be reinstated as a Shot Firer. So he is entitled for reinstatement in service in any alternative job, which he is able to perform according to the decision of the management, with effect from 1-6-1982 . In my considered view of the facts and circumstances of the case the workman is also entitled to 25% of the back wages from 1-6-1982 till the date of his reinstatement in service .

Hence, it is ordered:-

ORDER

The action of the management of Ghuggus Colliery ofM/s . WCL in terminating services of Shri Chandrayya, Shot Firer of Nakoda Incline we.f. 1-6-1982 is unjustified. The workman is entitled for reinstatement w.e.f. 1-6-1982 , butnot as a Shot Firer , but any other alternative job , which he is able to perform according to the decision of the management . The workman is also entitled for 25% of the back wages from 1-6-1982 till the date ofhis reinstatement inservice. The party no . 1, management of WCL is directed to give effect to the award within one month from the date ofpublication of the award in the Official Gazette .

J.P. CHAND , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 169.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ.सी.आई. के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण संख्या 2 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 28/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/243/2003- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी 388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

New Delhi , the 20th December, 2011 S.O. 169.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 28/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 20-12-2011.

[No. 1-22012/243 /2003 - IR (CM - II) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- II, CHANDIGARH Present : Sri A.K. Rastogi , Presiding Officer

Case No. I.D. 28/2004

Registered on 14/7/2004

The General Secretary, Food Corporation of India (Handling) Workers Union , 8654 , Arakashan Road, Paharganj , New Delhi

Claimants

Vs.

The Sr. Regional Manager. Food Corporation of India , SCO No. 120-122, Sector 17 -C Chan ir arh

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] appointment by District Manager FCI Kurukshetra individually. Since 1991 to January 2001 there was no dispute among the management and the aforesaid workmen but , abruptly their services were terminated verbally w.e.f. 12-1-2001 without conducting any inquiry. A complaint of one Ram Chander and an enquiry report of a committee constituted by the managernent on this complaint and a criminal case filed by one of the workers Rajdev Sahni finds mention in the claim statement . It has been stated that the termination of the services of the workmen is against the principles of natural justice . The reinstatement of the workmen with full back wages and continuity of service has been claimed by the Union .

Respondent

APPEARANCES :

For the Workman

: Sa Amit Sharma For the Management

: Sh . K.K. Gupta

AWARD

Passed on November , 18 , 2011l

Central Government , ide Notification No. L-22012/ 243/2003 - IR ( CM - II ) Dated 28-6-2004 ,by exercising its powers under Section 10 sub - section ( 1 ) Clause ( d ) and sub- section (2 - A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as ' Act ' ) has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-- "Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Kurukshetra in terminating the services of 29 Food landling Workers of Pehwa w.e.f.6-10-200 i is regal and justified ? If not, to what relief are they en'itled ?"

The list of 29 affected food handling workers of Pehwa Depot is enclosed as Annexure of the reference order. It has been stated in the clan staterent that Contrac : Labour System was abolished in Pehwa Depot of FCi by Haryana Government in 1985 and consequent upon the abolition of labour system the man igen.ent of FCI introduced the departmentalized system and accordingly the29 handling workers of the reference order were given Claimwas contested by the management . Inter alia it waspleaded that all the 29 food handling workers named inthe list are still working with Food Storage Depot of FCI atKaithal and therefore the claim of the workers ' union thattheir services had been dispensed with is frivolous and baseless . It was disclosed in the reply that 67 contract labours including those werking at Food Storage Depot Pehwa were departmentalizedby the FCI in pursuance of theNotification of 1985. But somehow 29 contract labour working at FSD Pehwa did not turn up for departmentalization and in acir place some fictitious persons by impersonating the rames of the original contractual labour represented fo, their departmentalization and produced fictitious identity cards verified by one Sh. H.P Singh General Secretary of the workers ' union . As such they were issued the appointment letters but in the name of the real persons . Subsequently one Ram Chander (mentioned in the claim statement) of another union made a complaint with documentary proof, to the effect that 29 persons by impersonating the name of the original workers were serving at Food Storage Depot Pehwa. In an inquiry those 29 fictitious persons admitted in writing that they were working by impersonation and also disclosed their real names which are detailed in the reply of the management . It has been stated by the management that there is no relationship of employer and employee between the management and the persons impersonating the real workmen . It has been further alleged that on knowing the factual position the fictitious persons were not allowed to work after 6-1-2001. On a subsequent complaint of some real workmen in a Criminal Court the management agreed to departmentalize them as they were found to be the real persons and consequently the criminal complaint as well as civil suit was withdrawn by them . The fictitious persons have no right to continue and as the persons named in Annexure 1 are still working with the FCI at Kaithal there is no industrial dispute between the management and these persons .

Inreply to the written statement of the management, the union reiterated the facts already alleged by it .

Inevidence, union examined one Satyanarayan Sahni S / o Shiv Lal Sahni who filed his affidavit, and his identity [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

card ExhibitW2 . On behalf of management Satya Narayan Sahni with the parentage of Shivjee Sahni and 15 other workmen named in Annexure I of the reference were examined besides the statement of Sudeep Singh Regional Manager Food Corporation of India, Haryana Region. Some documents were also filed by the parties which will be referred at the proper place .

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the evidence on record. Interestingly the union claimant failed to produce in evidence any other workman of Annexure 1 of the reference order except one Satya Narayan Sahni whose name finds place in the Annexure 1 at Serial No. 28. He has produced his identity card W2 also . In his cross - examination he denied the suggestion of the inanagement that identity card W2 is forged one and Satya Narayan Sahni is the name of somebody else . He denied that his father's name is Sokhi Yadav. It may be mentioned here that as per details given in the written statement the Committee constituted by the management for enquiry of the allegation of working ofsome persons under fictitious name found one Ram Updesh S/o Sokhi Yadavworking impersonating himselfas Satya Narayan Sahni . The witness has no other proof to establish his identity. Against it the management witness MW1 /1 Satya Narayan Sahni S/ o Shiv Lal Sahni has produced the copies of his domicile certificate , character certificate , caste certificate, voter list , ration card and two registered documents of transfer of immovable property referred to Exhibit R2/4 , R2/10 in the affidavit of the witness . In his affidavit he has stated that he is the real incumbent working in the FCI .

Interestingly the claimant did not cross -examine the witness despite the opportunity given to him . His identity was not challenged. In view of this fact , obviously the statement of workman witness Satya Narayan Sahni WI cannot be relied upon . All other workmen who have filed their affidavits on behalf of management have stated in their affidavit that they had been employed by the management during the pendency of a case in Kurukshetra Court and they are working in FCI and getting pay. They also stated that their name parentage and address is correct and it is recorded in the records ofmanagement also . Except one Upendra Sahni none other workman was cross- examined on behalf of the claimant. In case of Upender Sahni too his identity was not challenged during cross-examination by the claimant union.

389

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

the complaint of one Ram Chandra and the Committee found the existence of fictitious persons impersonating the real workmen. But the said Ram Chandra complainant did not appear before the Committee and in fact there was no person of his name . I don't find any weight in the argument to support the case of claimant union . The fact remains that the workmen named in Annexure I are working with the Department and on an inquiry it had been found that some fictitious persons were working with the Department impersonating the real workmen . It is immaterial as to how this fact came to knowledge of the management and who brought it to its notice . Such action can be taken on the basis of an anonymous complaint even . The non - existence of complainant cannot destabilize the established facts .

From the above going discussion it is clear that the management had not terminated the services of the workmen listed in Annexure 1 of the reference order and there is no industrial dispute between the management of FCI and these workmen. The reference is accordingly answered against the claimant union . Let two copies of the award be send to CentralGovernment for further necessary action .

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011 .

का.आ. 170.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 131/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/217/98- आई आर ( सी- II) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 20th December , 2011 S.O. 170.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.131/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL , and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 20-12-2011.

[No. L-22012/217/98- IR (C - II) ] D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM -LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Date: 9-12-2011 Case No. CGIT/NGP/131 /2000

Asstated above the workman alleged by the claimant union to have been effected by termination did not turn up to espouse their grievance . Instead 16 of them appeared in the witness -box in support of the management's case that the workmen named in Annexure 1 of the reference are actually working with the Department and there is no dispute between the management and the 29 workmen mentioned in Annexure 1 ofthe reference .

It was argued on behalf of claimant union that the Inquiry Committee is alleged to have been constituted on PartyNo. 1 : The Sub Area Manager,

WCL, Ballarpur Colliery, PO: Ballarpur, Distt . Chandrapur Versus 390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] PartyNo. 2 : The President, Koyla Shramik Sabha ( HMS ) , Miners Qtr. No. 58/1 , Ballarpur Colliery, PO: Ballarpur, Distt. Chandrapur (M.S.)

AWARD

(Dated, 9th December, 2011 )

Inexercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) ( "the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of WCL and Shri Namdeo S. Kakde , to CGIT- cum-Labour Court, Mumbai -2, for adjudication, as per letter No. L- 22012/217/98 - IR (CM - II) dated 28-4-1999, with the following schedule:-

"Whether the action ofthe management of Ballarpur Colliery ofWCL in dismissing Sh . Namdeo S. Kakde from services is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

Subsequently the case was transferred to this Tribunal for disposal in accordance with law.

2. On receipt ofthe reference , the parties were noticed to their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the Union, " Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS) " ("the union" in short) filed the statement ofclaim on behalf of theworkman Shri Namdeo S. Kakde, ("the Workman " in short) andthemanagement of Sub Area Manager, Ballarpur Colliery ofWCL ( "Party No. 1 " in short ) filed its written statement.

duties, but his request failed to the deaf ears of the management and the management did not give any reply to his letters and as such , he approached the union and the issue was raised by the union for discussion and despite productionofall the medical certificates showing his illness and treatment, the management did not allow him to join duties and as such , the matter was raised before the ALC. The further case of the workman is that under the rules governing the services of the employees , an employee cannot be removed from services without affording him an opportunity to explain the charges and if an employee satisfactorily explains the charges levelled against him, then the employer has no other alternative except to allow him on duty, otherwise a regular domestic enquiry is required to be held by the employer to prove the charges levelled against the employee and in case the charges are proved in the enquiry, then only, the employer is entitled to impose punishment according to the standing orders , but in his case, no notice of any nature or any charge sheet was issued against him and there had been no enquiry of whatsoever nature instituted or commenced against him and when an employee remains absent for a considerable long period oftime , without any intimation, as per the rules , a charge sheet or a notice is required to be served on the concerned employee by registered post with acknowledgement due in his permanent address as given in form 'B'register, which is filled in at the time ofjoining of his service and in case of non- service of the letter, due to the reason of non- availability of the addressee, then the notice is required to be published in the news paper, calling upon the employee to resume his duties within a specified period and in the event of failure of the employee to resume duties, then only, the employee is liable to be declared as a deserter and such procedure was not adopted in his case and his removal from services without any notice or charge sheet or enquiry is high handed , illegal and arbitrary act of the employer and as such , the same is untenable and liable to be set aside . The union had prayed to set aside the order passed on 16-9-1995 and to reinstate the workman in service with continuity and full back wages .

3. The party no.1 in its written statement has pleaded inter-alia that the workman was appointed as a Timber mazdoor on 18-11-1974 in Ballarpur colliery 3 & 4 pits and he was a habitual absentee and he was issued with several charge sheets and warning letters during the last five years before termination of his services vide order dated 16-9-1995 ofthe Superintendent ofMines , Ballarpur Colliery, 3 & 4 pits . The further case of the party No.1 is that the workman remained absent for more than 3 years without any application and as such , the management was within its rights to terminate the services of the workman , who was not at all interested in the job and the domestic enquiry in such cases are not warranted and as such , the workman is not entitled for any relief.

The case of the workman as projected by the union in the statement of claim is that the workman was appointed as a Timber mazdoor in the year 1974 and posted at 3 and 4 pitsofBallarpur colliery and worked honestly and faithfully and in September 1992, the workman suffered from chronic duodenal ulcer and anemia and he was admitted in the hospital of one doctor Bongirwar and remained under his treatment from 10-9-1992 to 15-8-1995 and as there was no remarkable recovery from the treatment of Dr. Bongirwar, the workman was shifted to the nursing home of Dr. R. D. Sonkamble and was admitted there from 15-8-1995 to 20-11-1996 and he was declared fit to resume his duties w.e.f. 21-11-1996 and during the period of his illness , he had sent his wife to Ballarpur Colliery to intimate about his illness, but the officers of Ballarpur Colliery did not pay any attention to her and sent her back without any action and as he was illiterate , he had no other source to communicate with the employer and after complete recovery from his illness , when he went to resume his duties , he was not allowed to join his duties , on the contrary, the letter bearing ref. no. WCL/BA/BC/38 /4524 dated 16-9-1995 was handed over to him on 21-11-1996 and from the said letter , he came to know that he had been removed from services . The further case of the workman is that thereafter he submitted number of applications to the management of Ballarpur Colliery with request to allow him to join his

4. Party no.1 by way of additional written statement has pleaded that in the facts and circumstances prevailing

1- [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

391 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

at the time of taking action against the workman , there was no need to issue a charge sheet and to conduct a departmental enquiry and in case, it is found by the Tribunal that an enquiry was necessary before termination of the services of the workman , then , it be permitted to lead evidence to prove the charges against the workman .

7. On the other hand, it was submitted on behalf of the workman that as the name ofthe workman was removed from the roll of the party No. 1 , without following the procedures as provided, under the standing orders , which govern the service conditions of the employees of WCL , the same is illegal and not sustainable in the eye of law and as such , the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .

4. A Both the parties adduced oral evidence in support of their respective claims . The union filed the evidence of the workman on affidavit in support of the claim. The evidence of the workman remained unchallenged, as he was not cross examined by the management .

One Arun Kumar Sinha, a senior under manager, WCL was examined as a witness by the party No. 1. The evidence of the witness for party no. 1 is in the same line of the stands taken by party no. 1 in the written statement. However, in his cross - examination , this witness has admitted that he doesn't know if the order of termination was received by the workman or not and before termination of the services of the workman , no charge sheet was submitted against him and no enquiry was also made .

5. Perused the record . It is the admitted case of the parties that the workman remained absent from services w.e.f. 10-9-1992 till 20-11-1996, without any application . It is also found from the documents that by office order dated 16-9-1995, the name of the present workman was removed fromthe colliery roll with immediate effect . It is also admitted that no charge sheet was issued by party No. 1 against the workman for remaining unauthorized absent for the period as mentioned above and there was no departmental enquiry against him. The order dated 16-9-1995 shows that the name of the workman was removed from the roll ofthe colliery on the ground of his remaining absent unauthorizedly for more than three months .

8. The Standing Orders in respect of WCL apply to all workmen employed in all the units of WCL situated in differentplaces in the country and include all workmen governed by the National Coal Wage Agreement . Clause 26 of the said Standing Orders provides what denote misconduct and according to clause 26.30 , absence from duty without sanctioned leave or sufficient cause or overstaying beyond 10 days after sanctioned leave is a misconduct. Clauses 27 and 27.1 of the Standing Orders provide the punishments and penalties which may be imposed for misconduct . Clause 28 provides the procedure for imposition of penalties . Clause 28.1 of the Standing Orders provides that where an employee is charged with a misconduct, he shall be informed in writing of the allegations against him by the competent authority and shall be given an opportunity to submit his explanation in writing within a period of not less than three days and on receipts of a workman's explanation when allegations are denied by him, an enquiry shall be held normally by an officer of the company appointed by the management and atthe enquiry, the workman concerned shall be afforded reasonable opportunity of defending himself and the workman concerned shall be entitled to be represented or assisted by a co - worker or officer bearer of a trade union of which he is a member, if so requested by him during the enquiry. It is clear from the provisions of the Standing Orders applicable to the employees of WCL as mentioned above that for imposition of penalties for the misconduct of remaining unauthorized absent , it is necessary to give a charge sheet in writing against the employee and to initiate a departmental proceeding to enquire into the charges , in case the employee doesn't admit the charges . In this case, it isadmitted by the party no . I that no notice was sent or served on the workman for remaining unauthorized absent and there was also no departmental enquiry. Party No.1 has failed to show any provision either in the Standing Orders or any other law applicable to the employees of WCL that the management is authorized to remove the name of an employee from the roll of the management for remaining unauthorized absent for more than months , without show cause or initiation of the departmental proceedings . Hence , the removal of the name of the workman from the roll of the WCL without any notice or charge sheet and in absence of any departmental enquiry isfound to be illegal and unsustainable in the eye of law.

6.At the time of argument , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 that where the ground of discharge is continuous absence of the employee and his inability to do work, no purpose would be served by a formal charge delivered to him and the workman was a habitual absentee and he was not working efficiently and therefore , the removal of his name from the roll of the company cannot be said to be without reasonable cause . In support of such contentions , reliance has been placed by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 on the decisions reported in AIR 1957 SC - 38 ( Burn and Company Vs. Their Employee) , 1995 I L.L.J. - 1065 ( A.M. Eashwarachar vs. Executive Engineer ( Electrical ) ) , 2003 (3 ) MPHT 257 [Eveready Industries ( I ) Ltd. Vs. Shri P. S. Parihar ) , (2005) 5 SCC - 337 ( Vivekanand Shetty Vs. Chairman J & K Bank Ltd. ), (2008 ) 3 SCC -446 ( New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. BipinBiharilal Srivastav), ( 2001 ) 1 SCC-424 ( Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd .. Vs. Pralhad Singh ) , 1997 II . L.L.J. - 100 (Hindustan Paper Corpn . Vs. Purnendu Chakraborty) , 1998 ( 1 ) L.L.N. 710 ( Anna Transport Corpn . Vs. Labour Court Salem) and 2001 LLR - 1180 (NRC Ltd. Vs. NRC Employee Union) .

9. From the materials on record , it is found that the workman was remaining absent from duty unauthorisedly and for that he had been warned several times . It is also [PART II -SEC . 3 ( i) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

392

Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of M/s . C.C.Ltd . and their workman , which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 20-12-2011 .

[No. L-20012/120/ 1995 - IR (C - I )] found from record that the workman remained absent from duty from 10-9-1992 to 20-11-1996, due to his ill health and he was under medical treatment during that period. Hence, the removal of the name of the workman from the roll of WCL BallarpurArea is not proper.

D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALFRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

10.With respect, I am of the view that the decisions cited by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 have no direct application to the present case at hand , as the facts and circumstances of the cases referred in the above decisions are quite different from the facts and the circumstances of the case at hand .

Shri Kishori Ram , Presiding Officer

Inthe matter ofan Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (! )(d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 47 of 1996 11. In view of the discussions made above and the materials on record, it is found that the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service w.e.f. 21-11-1996 . The workman is also entitled to get 25 % of back wages w.e.f. 21-11-1996 till the date of his reinstatement in service . Hence , it is ordered:

ORDER

Parties Employers in relation to the management of Kathara Colliery of M/s . C.C.Ltd . and their workman

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workman : None

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D.K. Verma , Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, Dhanbad, the 7th December, 2011 The action of the management of Ballarpur Colliery ofWCL in dismissing Sh . Namdeo S. Kakde from services is illegal and unjustified . The workman is entitled for reinstatement w.e.f. 21-11-1996 and to get 25% of back wagesw.e.f. 21-11-1996 till the date of his reinstatement of hisservice. The workman is not entitled for any other relief. The party no.1 , management of WCL is directed to give effect to the award within one month from the date of publication of the award in the official gazette .

AWARD

J.P. CHAND, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2011

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1 )(d) of the 1.D.Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L-20012/ 120/ 95 - I.R. (Coal - I ) dated, 4-4-96.

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 171. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , धनबाद नं . 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 47/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of Kathara Colliery of M/ s . C.C. Ltd. , in not protecting the pay of Sri Tilku Das ofGroup -V Wages and non - payment of 30 days V.D.A. while fixing the pay after promotion to the post of SecurityGuard is justified ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled?"

[सं. एल-20012/120/1995 - आई आर ( सी- I) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th December , 2011

S.O. 171. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.47/ 1996) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court - 2 Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the

2. The case of the workman as sponsored by the Union concerned is that workman Tilku Das had been getting Group - V wages and V.D.A. for thirty days since his appointment as permanent piece - rated worker on 17-10-71. The Management though regularised/promoted him as Security Guard , and posted at Sounda Colliery of M/s. N.C.D.C. on 1-11-1974 , yet suddenly began to pay his the minimum basic of the Security Guard without protection ofhis group wages , as well also 26 days in place of30days V.D.Awhich were prejudice to his basic wages for which 393 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Finding with Reasoning

4. In this reference , WW- 1 Tilku Das , the workman himself in behalf of the Union , and MW- 1 J. Bara as personnel Manager for the Management have been examined .

the Management had liability to fix his basic wage as workman under protection of his Group-V wages as per law and its own circular and policy decision . After the assurance of the Management for its favourable decision awaited since long over his several representations for it , the industrial dispute lastly raised before the ALC ( C) , Hazaribagh for amicable settlement also resulted in its failure for the adamant attitude of the Management , hence the reference for adjudication . Thus the aforesaid action ofthe Management in not protecting his basic wages of Group-V wages etc. was not only unjustified and illegal but also vindictive and anti labour policy. It has been claimed for the fixation of his basic protected wages and its consequential benefits with retrospective effect .

Theworkman himself in his rejoinder with categorical denials pleaded that he was getting 30 days V.D.A in a month prior to his promotion as Security Guard when he immediately objected to illegal payment and deduction, the Management misassuredly advised him to patiently wait as per its notesheet .

According to the statement of workman Tilku Das (WW- 1 ) the management used to pay him as Minor / Loader thewages ofGroup-V @ Rs . 6.75 per day as Ext . W- 1(the certificate dated 2-12-88 issued by Sr. P.O/ K.P) since his appointment on 17-10-71 at Selected Dhori Colliery but on since 1-11-74, the Management changed his designation asSecurity Guard reducing his wages to Rs. 5.40 per day without notice . He states that the other Security Guards are entitled to get V.D.A for 30 days but the management allowed him V.D.A for 26 days . But the very admission of the workman that the original of Ext . W- 1 lying at his home, and bearing not any office seal , that the order was issued on the pad of Kalyani Project , but he was not under the Kalyani Project in the year 1988 (while the aforesaid order / certificate was issued to him ) disprove his claim for V.D.A for 30 days , as he did not prove any paper to show it .

5. Whereas MW - 1 J. Bara as the Personnel Manager has affirmed that the workman initially as a piece rated worker was subsequently converted to monthly rated worker in 1977. He ( MW- 1 ) also asserted that monthly workers are entitled to draw D.A. for 26 days in a month and in case they remain on leave for a day, their salary is calculated out of same 26 , after deduction of one day , and their balance amount is paid . Previously the workman never challenged the status of his conversion of monthly rated worker.

6. The workman Tilku Das himself appeard and tried to justify his claim as justified. But D.K. Verma, Learned Advocate for the Management contends that D.A. is a part of the wages , and it is admissible for the days work done for 26 days only, so payment of30 days V.D.A. is not usually justified claim , moreover, so for as the pay protection the workman has not discharged what disparities of his wages, and the date of fixation of wages except Ext . W- 1 the photo copy of the letterdt . 2-12-88 of Kalyani Project which is itself inadmissible in view of his admission about hisnon - posting there at the relevant time.

7. On the perusal of the materials in the case record, I find the workman has failed to prove his case with any reliable documents in support of his claim . Hence , it is hereby held that the action of the Management of Kathara Colliery of M /s . C.C. Ltd. in not protecting the pay of Sri Tilku Das of Group - V wages and non - payment of 30 daysV.D.Awhile fixing the pay after promotion to the post of Security Guard is quite justified in lack of his proof, so he is not at all entitled to any relief,

3. Whereas the pleaded case of the Management with specific denials is that workman Tilku Das was working at Selected Dhori Colliery as piece - rated worker while its take over w.e.f. 31-1-1973 under the Coal Mines (Taking over Management ) Act , 1973. The NCDC after take over of the colliery later on became M / s . Central Coalfields Ltd. Piece - rated workers performing the job of removing over burden of earth/soil and of shale , stone etc. came under Group I and II. The workman as a piece rated overburden remover for earth cutting could be fit in the group as per the wage Board recommendation applicable since the nationalisation from 1-5-1973 , but the small collieries including selected Dhori Colliery related to pencast did not implement the recommendation , as it was not required to supply coal to the Steel Plant on the Railways . So the Management placed the workman in Group I later on at his request , regular workman as Security Guard in the monthly scale for Peon , Guards etc. He received more than that he used to get under the Minimum Wages Act as piece rated worker for removal of overburden . So there was full protection of his wages . The employees working under NCDC while the collieries were under Railways , get wages as per C.P.C. and V.D.A was for 30 days in a month . But as per the Wage Board Recommendation , 26 working days are for monthly and accordingly a daily rated wage divisible by 26 days , and the V.D.A was paid only for 26 days , in a month . The workman was never on roll of NCDC in CPC , rather he was a workman of a private colliery. He was regularised as Security Guard in 1974 , but the dispute being raised much belatedly in 1995 is legally unınaintainable. So the workman is not entitled to any relief.

KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer 2G1 /12-17 394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2011

AWARD

By Order No. L -41011 / 12/2001 - IR ( B - 1 ) dated 25-01-2002 the Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 ) ( d ) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes , Act , 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

का.आ. 172.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पूर्व रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कलकत्ता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 02/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-12-2011 प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41011 / 12/2001- आईआर ( बी -1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2011

"Whether the action of the management of Eastern Railway, Asansol in not deploying S/ Shri Shyam Babu Paswan & 249 others ( List enclosed Annexure Al and 2) licensed porters in the work of handling ofRailway Parcel is justified ? If not , what relief the concerned licensed porters are entitled ? "

2. When the case is called out today, none is found to be present on behalf of either of the parties.

S.O. 172. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 02/2002 ) of the Cent . Govt. Indus . Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Kolkata as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Eastern Railway and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 21-12-2011 .

[No. 41011 / 12/2001 - IR (B - I ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 02 of 2002

3. In the present matter it is found that fresh notices were issued to the respective parties on 22-07-2010 and the acknowledgement cards received back show that both the notices were served upon the respective parties on 26-07-2010 . Several dates were adjourned thereafter and on none of the dates either of the parties appeared even after service of notice . On perusal of the previous order in this regard it is found that the conduct of the respective parties is not satisfactory since they have stopped appearance since 13-12-2007, in course of tenure of my learned predecessor in chair.

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of The Sr. Div. Commercial Manager , Eastern Railway, Asansol Division , P. O. Asansol AND Their workmen .

Present : Mr. Justice Manik Mohan Sarkar Presiding Officer

Appearance:

Onbehalf of the Management

In such circumstances , I do not think it proper to drag this matter any more since the parties , specially the workmen side did not show any interest to proceed with the matter and by their conduct it is presumed that the industrial dispute raised earlier , perhaps is not subsisting . So, let the present matter be disposed of with a "No Dispute Award" .

: Mr. M. K. Ghosh, CTI , Eastern Railway, Asansol .

An Award is passed accordingly.

Onbehalf of the Workmen

: Mr. R. V. K. Singh Vhati , General Secretary ofthe workmen union .

JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR, Presiding Officer State : West Bengal . : Industry: Railway.

Kolkata Dated, the 12th December, 2011

Dated: 12th December, 2011 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SL.

NAMES

(2)

(1)

01. Shree Gango Shaw 02.

Manki Shaw 03.

Nageshwar Shaw 04. Dwarika Shaw 05.

Mohan Shaw "

06.

Ramlakhan Shaw

Jai Ram Shaw 07.

08. "

Niranjan Shaw 09.

Tukan Shaw "

Chetawan Shaw 10.

11.

Hulash Shaw 12.

Sani Char Shaw 13.

Inder Shaw 14.

Mahesh Shaw 15.

Kunjit Shaw 16

Sukhdev Shaw 17.

Baldew Shaw 18. SamlalShaw 19.

Madho Shaw 20.

Lalo Shaw

21.

Naro Shaw 22.

23. Dilchand Shaw 24.

Rabindra Shaw 25. Gamahir Shaw 26. Kishun Shaw 27. Karu Shaw 28.

Mahru Shaw 29.

Lakhan Shaw 30.

Fusri Shaw 31.

Bodhi Shaw 32. Makhu Shaw 33.

Rohan Shaw 34.

Pito Shaw

Charan Shaw 35.

395

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

Reference

ANNEXURE-A1

(1 ) LIST OF THE LICENSED PORTERS

FATHER'S NAME

RLY. RADGE No.

(3)

(4)

Damri Shaw

999

Hiraman Shaw

948

796

Kamal Shaw

928

Churaman Shaw

820

BiganShaw

864

Sukar Shaw

Tulo Shaw

893

855

Chhatoo Shaw

804

Doman Shaw

Mahabir Shaw

861

860

SukarShaw

908

Deva Shaw

807

Doman Shaw

811

937

Late Ramdhani Shaw

870

Anup Shaw

856

Mangru Shaw

910

LitoShaw

758

Late Shamer Shaw

825

Ghri Shaw

827

Janki Shaw

Todi Shaw

828

974

Dhaman Shaw

919

Dokhi Shaw

813

Chohan Shaw

849

Motee Shaw

824

Fagu Shaw

818

Late Biltu Shaw

800

Late Biltu Shaw

791

Late Shomer Shaw

789

Late Bali Shaw

840

Late Shamar Shaw

809

Late Churaman Shaw

963

Late Balo Shaw

884

Late Jebi Shaw 396

(1)

(2)

Kharakdhari Shaw 36. Shree

37.

Tejo Shaw

38. Mahendra Shaw 39. Dhoneshwar Shaw 40. RuplalShaw

41. Ruplal Shaw

42. Ritlal Shaw

43. Mahadev Shaw 44. Shyamlal Shaw

45. Horil Shaw

46. Dinesh Shaw

47.

Ram Kishan Shaw 48. Tulu Shaw

49.

Joban Shaw

50. Dershan Shaw

51 . Talo Shaw

52. Umesh Mandal

53. ArjunMondal

54. Prakash Roy

Sadanand Mondal 55.

56. Geeta Mondal

57. Jouala Mondal

58. Md . Muslim

59. Janardhan Yadav 60.

Ram Ashree Mondal 61. Sahindra Kumar 62. Ganesh Yadav

63. Rajendra Mondal 64. Vishonath Mondal 65. Shiv Balak Mondal 66. Ram Sharan Mondal 67. Jai Nandan Pd . Mondal 68. Ramjeet Rawat

69 . Sunaina Yadav

70. Shankar Singh

71. Ram Charitra Yadav 72. Badan Rauth

73. Sahdev Mondal 74. Hari Shaw

75.

PunitYadav

76.

Suresh Yadav

77.

Radhe Yadav

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (4)

(3)

943

Late Todi Shaw

814

Late Amrit Shaw

969

Late Mohan Shaw

832 Late Dilo Shaw

834 Late Tipu Shaw

Late Kesho Shaw

822

939

Late Vikho Shaw

753

Kishun Shaw

944

Tanki Shaw

768

Nam Dhari Shaw

802 Baiju Shaw

790

Hiraman Shaw

903

Tokhan Shaw

767

Beni Shaw

Kheman Shaw

846

797

Mangal Shaw

987

Ram Khelawan Mandal

950

Shadev Mondal

862

Chano Roy

869

Bino Mondal

837

Sarjugh Mondal

934

Rajnath Mondal

981

Shafique Mian

Bhunna Yadav

882

984

Ram Avtar Mondal

925

Sarju Mondal

766

Kalu Yadav

998

Baij Nath Mondal

874 Nepali Mondal

953

PunitMondal

904

Daragi Mondal

838

Bindeswar Mahato

812 Basudev Rawat

913

Kishun Yadav

782

Nand Kishor Singh

778

Benarsi Yadav

843

Kishun Routh

Dhani Mondal

985

831 ArjunShaw

935 Ganga Yadav

906 Karu Yadav

852

Dhori Yadav [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(1)

Shree Khako Rawat

78 .

Pholeshwar Yadav 79.

Mushahro Yadav 80.

81. Narayan Yadav

82. GajaYadav

83. Baldev Yadav

84. Tirloke Yadav

85. Dwarik Yadav

86. Md . Umesh Mian 87. Dharmendra Tant

Chhattar Yadav 88.

89. Lukman Mian

90.

Arjun Yadav

Dhirendra Rawat 91 .

Jaddu Mondal

92.

Radhe Rawat

93.

94.

Md. Yaqoob

95.

Bhopali Yadav

Inderdev Yadav 96.

97. Naresh Yadav

98. Moti Yadav

99. Ashok Mondal 100.

Bhagwan Tanti

Ramdeo Paswan 101 .

Bahadur Paswan 102.

Shiv Paswan

103.

Shiva Kumar Paswan 104.

105.

Opendra Paswan

Shiv Nandan Paswan 106.

107.

Brij Nandan Paswan

Nand Kishar Paswan 108 .

Dani Paswan

109.

Ram Sohawan Paswan 110 .

111 . Vijay Singh

Kameshwar Paswan 112.

113.

Shya Saran Paswan

Arvind Paswan 114.

Rama Nand Paswan 115.

Kishori Paswan 116.

397

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

(4)

(3)

976

Bhago Rawat

Karu Yadav

854

Sitabi Yadav

924

Mohan Yadav

901

Bhikhari Yadav

839

Titoo Yadav

991

Dorik Yadav

881

Ratan Yadav

920

Md. Rasul Mian

860

Etwari Tanti

801

995

Jagdish Yadav

NoorMd.

865

Bhatoo Yadav

933

Charittar Rawat

847

819

JugalMondal

Sitaram Rawat

853

868

KhalilMian

875

Shyama Yadav

Sevak Yadav

938

Dhani Yadav

973

Bali Yadav

909

Mathura Mondal

816

Ram Tanti

950

Mishri Paswan

952

Baldeo Paswan

762

Dhori Paswan

988

Kameshwar Paswan

941

949

Laloo Paswan

Bhukan Paswan

957

Misri Paswan

835

Bhairo Paswan

787

863

Hajari Paswan

879

Bhagwat Paswan

773

Sahadev Singh

Brahndav Paswan

844

Bihari Paswan

1000

765

Nandi Paswan

923

Ganga Paswan

841

Gajadhar Paswan 398

(1)

(2)

117 Shree Narayan Paswan 118.

Ram Keshwar Paswan 119.

Shyam Paswan 120.

Karo Paswan

121.

Kedar Paswan 122.

Balmeki Paswan 123.

Dharamraj Paswan 124.

Moni Lal Paswan 125 .

Subodh Singh

126.

Paras Paswan

وو

127.

Dev Nandan Paswan 128.

Ram Lakhan Paswan 129.

Nawal Paswan

130.

Inder Dev Paswan 131.

Vinod Paswan

132.

AnilSingh

133.

Ram Saran Paswan 134.

Naresh Paswan 135.

Jogeshwar Ram 136.

Bhagwan Paswan 137.

ArunSingh

138.

Baccho Paswan 139.

Mithlesh Paswan 140.

Raju Paswan

141.

Shree Basant Paswan 142.

Suresh Paswan

143.

Anandi Paswan 144.

Jogindra Das

145.

Amrik Paswan

146.

RamjeePaswan 147.

Ramvilas Paswan 148.

Kapil Paswan

149.

Inderdev Paswan 150.

Sudama Paswan 151

Ganauri Paswan

152.

Sadhu Paswan

153 .

Kedar Paswan

154.

Devnandan Paswan 155.

Siddheswar Paswan 156 .

Bilash Paswan

157.

LaljeePaswan

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (3)

(4)

851

Baij Nath Paswan

808

Darbari Paswan

940

Jagan Nath Paswan

786

Goriwan Paswan

798

Munshi Paswan

980

Mangal Paswan

830

Piyare Paswan

756

Goyadhar Paswan

991

Doman Singh

931

Ram Briksh Paswan

896

Ram Dulare Paswan

982

Hari Paswan

873

Paryag Paswan

877

Charan Paswan

885

Ram Uchit Paswan

899

Basudev Singh

905

Mahabir Paswan

858

Ramdas Paswan

954

Bhotto Ram

900

Banwari Paswan

943

Naresh Singh

793

Baldev Paswan

890

Ram Chandra Paswan

815

Dukhi Paswan

871

GopalPaswan

774

Sanichar Paswan

918

Baldev Paswan

964

Jagan Das

977

Ganga Paswan

754

Wazir Paswan

826

Brahmdev Paswan

897

Brahmdev Paswan

784

Ghamman Paswan

867

Dewari Paswan

932

Laldhari Paswan

902

Pakira Paswan

876

Mangal Paswan

781

Devki Paswan

996

Misri Paswan

927

Chhatadardhari Paswan

803

Darogi Paswan [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

(1)

(2)

158 . Shree Ramdev Paswan 159. Bhola Paswan 160.

Sarvesh Paswan 161. ArjunDas

162.

Sakal Paswan 163.

Ram Briksh Paswan 164

Kameshwar Paswan

399 (3)

(4)

898

Totan Paswan

911

Lakhan Paswan

817

Gopal Paswan

886

Mahindra Das

889

Lokshman Paswan

894

Kashi Paswan

845 Guthuk Paswan

165. Arvind Singh 166. Kamlesh Paswan 167.

Ram Pahal Paswan SL . No. Name

( 1)

(2)

799

Jaddu Singh

914

Balkishor Paswan

974

Jaladhar Paswan

ANNEXURE- A2 Father'sName (3)

01 .

Sh . Hawaldar Yadav

BadgeNo. (4)

Sh . Solkhan Yadav

02.

Sh . Ram Niwash Yadav

972

997

Sh . Ram Janam Yadav

03. Sh . Nandji Yadav

805

Sh. Sipahi Yadav

04.

Sh . Ram Chandra Yadav

946

Sh . Ram Iqbal Yadav

05.

Sh . Kamlesh Yadav

06. Sh . Raju Yadav

Sh . Naresh Yadav

958

833

Sh . Brahma Yadav

07. Sh . Raja Ram Yadav

966

Sh . Jag Narayan Yadav

08.

Sh . Krishna Yadav

09. Sh . Dadhiwal Yadav Sh . Jamuna Yadav

752

759

Sh . Tengar Yadav

10 . Sh . Raja Ram Yadav

915

Sh . Tengar Yadav

11. Sh . Jagdish Yadav

975

Sh . Ram Ashray Yadav

12.

Sh . Ram Ashre Yadav Sh . Hare Nath Yadav

13. Sh . Surendra Yadav

922

895

Sh . Pyare Yadav

14. Sh . Jawahar Choudhry

842

Sh. Ram Kawal Choudhry

15. Sh . Ram Prakash Yadav

992

Sh . Lal Mohar Yadav

16. Sh . Badan Routh

Sh . Kishun Routh

17.

Sh . Kamlesh Yadav

843

751

Sh . Harakh Nath Yadav

18. Sh . Raj Dhari Yadav

757

Sh . Raghuvir Yadav

19. Sh . GupteswarYadav Sh . Jamuna Yadav

20. Sh . Rama Kant Yadav

760

857

Sh . Tileswar Yadav

21 .

Sh . Sukhari Yadav

912

Sh . Baij Nath Yadav

22. Sh . Bali Ram Yadav

955

Sh . Mushafir Yadav

23. Sh . Chhatu Choudhry

872

Sh . Shri Ram Choudhry

24.

Sh . Ganga Sagar Yadav

978

Sh . Ram Chandra Yadav

25. Sh . Raj Kishor Ray

821

Sh . Ganpati Ray

26. Sh . Satya Narayan Kurmi

774

Sh . Sita Ram Kurmi

27. Sh . Vyash Muni Yadav

968

Sh . Nagina Yadav

28. Sh . Ram Ji Yadav

761

Sh . Jagdish Yadav

29. Sh . Hari Mohan Yadav

755

Sh . Ram Pujan Yadav

30. Sh. Baghan Yadav

Sh . Ram Ashre Yadav

994 400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

(3) (1) (2)

31. Sh . Parmesh Yadav

32. Sh . Baij Nath Yadav 33. Sh. Rajendra

34. Sh . Ram Chandra Choudry 35. Sh . Jamuna Yadav

36. Sh . Laxman Yadav

37. Sh . Saral Yadav

38. Sh . Lotan Yadav

Sh . Kashi Nath Yadav 39.

40. Sh . Baij Nath Yadav 41. Sh . Ram Prawesh Yadav 42. Sh . Ashok Yadav

43. Sh . Braham Dev Kahar 44. Sh . Bateswar Yadav 45. Sh . Suresh Yadav

46. Sh . Fauzdar Yadav

47. Sh. Shivji Kahar

48. Sh . Mantu Yadav

49. Sh. Ramji Kahar

50. Sh . Ram Subhag Yadav 51. Sh . Sri Kant Rauth

52. Sh . Ram Surat Yadav 53. Sh . Bharath Yadav

54. Sh . Parshu Ram Yadav 55. Sh . Chanchal Yadav 56 Sh. Mangru Yadav

57. Sh . Brahman Dev Yadav 58. Sh. Jugeswar Yadav 59. Sh . Bharath Yadav

60.

Sh . Bachan Yadav

61. Sh . Sanjay Yadav

62. Sh . Sughan Yadav

63. Sh . Kishun Paswan 64.

Sh . Nand Ji Sahu

65. Sh . Baij Nath Yadav 66.

Sh . Kolahal Yadav

67.

Sh . Kesh Nath Yadav 68. Sh . Hira Lal Kurmi

69. Sh . Manoj Kahar

70. Sh . Bharath Yadav

71.

Sh . Sachin Yadav

72.

Sh . Fanu Routh

IR [PART II --SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (4)

936

Sh . Baij NathYadav

806

Sh . Ram Das Yadav

942

Not Known

990

Sh . Gandhi Choudry

763

Sh . Nand Gopal Yadav

785

Sh . Ram Pujan Yadav

859

Sh . Bachan Yadav

786

Sh. Kalpul Yadav

967

Sh . Baij Nath Yadav

970

Sh . Naresh Yadav

810

Sh . Dashrath Yadav

780

Sh . Saral Yadav

979

Sh . Ramu Kahar

775

Sh . Ganesh Yadav

956

Sh . Bihari Yadav

887

Sh . Bachan Yadav

868

Sh . Achche Lal Kahar

823

Sh . Bhajan Yadav

892

Sh . Parikhan Kahar

Sh . Mukh Lal Yadav

783

Sh . Saryu Routh

Sh . Bali Yadav

770

Sh . Ram Govind Yadav

Sh . Biseswar Yadav

Sh . Markat Yadav

Sh . Ram Pati Yadav

Sh . Parhalad Yadav

777

Sh . Muneswar Yadav

Sh . Chhotkan Yadav

881

792

Sh . Munna Yadav

848

Sh . Markandey Yadav

947

Sh . Harender Yadav

921

Sh . Shiv Balak Paswan

Sh . Khem Lal Sahu

795

Sh . Sipahi Yadav

986

Sh . Nemdhari Yadav

Sh . Kapil Yadav

779

Sh.Baiju Kurmi

888

Sh . Jageswar Kahar

Sh . Laxman Yadav

Sh . Gena Yadav

Sh . Shiv Nandan Routh 401 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

Sh . Fuleshwar Yadav 951

73. Sh . Jay Nath Yadav

Sh . Kailash Yadav

74. Sh . Som Nath Yadav

75. Sh . Nanhu Kurmi

Sh . Jag Nath Kurmi 788

Sh . Baij Nath Yadav

76. Sh . Parash Yadav

Sh Ram Chandra Yadav

77. Sh . Biseswar Yadav

Sh . Ram Nath Yadav

78. Sh . Sirati Yadav

NotKnown

79 . Sh. Kapoor Goudrh

Sh . Ganga Dyal Yadav

80. Sh . Baleswar Yadav

Sh . Dharam Dev

81. Sh . Dipti

Sh . Jay Nath Yadav

82. Sil . Hari Narayan Yadav

Sh . Shri Ram Yadav

83. Sh . Upendra Yadav

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2011

AND Their Workmen

PRESENT : Shri H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES :

For the Employers : Shri D. K. Verma , Advocate

For the Workman None

का.आ. 173. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद नं. -1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-12-2011 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

State : Jharkhand : Industry: Coal Dated 13-12-2011

AWARD

[ सं. एल-20012/107/2002- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2011

By Order No.1 . - 20012 / 107/ 2002 - IR ( C - I ) dated 26-7-2002 the Central Govt . in the Ministry of Labour has, inexercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub- Sec. ( 1 ) and sub- sec . ( 2A ) of Section 10 of the I.D. Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to thisTribunal :

S.O. 173. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court- 1 , Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s . BCCL, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-12-2011.

[No. L -20012/107/2002- IR (C - I ) ]

"Whether the demand from the management of Bastacolla Area of M / s . BCCL for regularization of Sri Rana Pratap Singh , concerned workman, in the post of Attendance Clerk and pay him SLU and promotion is legal and justified ? If so , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to and from which date ?"

D. S. S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I , DHANBAD

LOK ADALAT

In the matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947

2. This reference case was fixed on 13-10-2011 for hearing on settlement petition filed by Shri D. K. Verma , Advocate for the management , on 18-3-2010 duly signed by both the parties . I have gone through the terms of settlement and I find it fair and proper. Since none was present on 13-10-2011 on behalf of the workman , it is presumed that the settlement has already been arrived at between the parties .

Reference No. 87 of 2002

3. Accordingly, I pass an award in terms of setttlement , which shall form part of the Award .

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Bas: colla Area of BCCL

2GI /12-18 402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

FORM 'H'

(Seerule-58)

Bipartite Settlement Arrived at Between the Management of Bastacolla Area /Dobari Colliery and Representatives of RCMS Regarding the Case of Shri Rana Pratap Singh .

Representing Management

Representing Union 1. Sri K. M. Bansal , General Manager , Area IX .

2. Sri . Randhir Singh , Dy. CPM Area IX.

Sri . N. G. Arun , Orgn . Secretary ( Legal ), RCMS .

3. Sri R. P. Yadav, PM( IR ) Area IX.

Sri Rana Pratap Singh Concerned workman .

4. Sri S. C. Pandiya , ProjectOfficer, Dobari Colliery

5. Sri R. N. Dutta, Sr. PO Dobari Colliery.

SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE

The case of Sri Rana Pratap Singh ofDobari Colliery under Bastacolla Area was raised by RCMS union at Hqtr . level with the contention that Sri . Rana Pratap Singh , Asstt. Surveyor ( Unqualified) was performing the job of supervision of coal despatch for which an authorisation was issued by the then Dy. CME , Dobari Colliery vide letter No. D/IX/89 / 1717 dated 1-8-89 . The case was examined in depth byGM ( IR), BCCL for which he also visited Dobari Colliery to examine therelevant records and details of the case . During course of examination it was found that although Shri Rana Pratap Singh was working on surface from 1989 onwards for the said job but he was getting payment of Underground allowance up in 1999 .

The matter was placed before the competent authority of Hqtr . by GM ( IR) , BCCL and on being approved by the competent authority the approval was communicated byGM ( IR ) , BCCL , Koyla Bhawan vide his notesheet no . 1306 dated 25-2-2002 and accordingly settlement is arrived at on the following terms and condition:--

1. That the designation of Shri Rana Pratap Singh , Asstt. Surveyor ( Unqualified ) presently in T& S Gr.'D' carring the grade of T& S Gr. ' C ' ( SLU) will be changed as Asstt . Loading Inspector in his existing grade i.e. in T&S Gr. ' C ' ( SLU) with immediate effect .

2 Hisplace of posting will be at Dobari Colliery till further order.

His service will be made use of in connection with Wagon Loading in siding specially for quality loading to avoid demurrage and quality deduction.

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 4. His service willbe on probation of one year . During this period of service is not found satisfactory, management hold rights for revert him back to his substantive post.

5. In the part of working in surface and drawn underground allowance for the entire period , the same will be calculated by the unit and it will be deducted in equal instalment fixed by the Management and communicated including recovery of Employer's PF contribution and interest thereupon.

6. His roll will be at Dobari and his services will be utilised for Wagon Loading at siding .

7. That case pending at Conciliation/ Tribunal will be withdrawn by the union .

Union side

Management side

1. ( K. M. Bansal ) General Manager, Ar. IX.

1. (N. G. Arun) Orgn . Sec . , RCMS 2. ( Randhir Singh) Dy . CPM , Area - IX .

(Rana Pratap Singh ) Concerned workman 3. ( R. P. Yadav) PM ( IR) , Area IX,

4. (S. C. Pandiya) ProjectOfficer DobariColliery

5. ( R. N. Dutta) Sr. PO , Dobari

नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 174.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/373/2001- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st December, 2011

S.O. 174. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 24/2002 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 21-12-2011 .

[No. L- 12012/373/2001 - IR (B - I ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer 403 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

Court, Bombay in writ petition no . 66 dated 13-02-1998 for adhering strictly the promotion policy in case of the incadre BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Date: 8-12-2011 .

Case No. CGIT/ NGP/24/2002

The Assistant General Manager ,

Party No. 1 :

State Bank of India , Regional Office, New Mondha, P.B. No. 5 , Nanded, Maharashtra -431602 .

Versus

PartyNo. 2 : The Assistant General Secretary, State Bank Karmachari Sena , C/ o . State Bank of India , Nanded Branch , Doctor's Lane , Ghamodiya Factory, Vazirabad , Nanded-431201 (M.S. )

AWARD

(Dated: 8thDecember , 2011 )

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) ( " the Act " in short) , the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of State Bank of India and Shri P.R. Natu , for adjudication , as per letter No. L - 12012 / 373 / 2001 - IR ( B - 1 ) dated 5-02-2002 , with the following schedule :--

"Whether the action of the management of Asstt. General Manager, Region - I , State Bank of India , Nanded (Mah. ) in not implementing in the cadre higher appointment/promotion policy and deprived to Shri P.R. Natu for his promotion w.e.f. 1-7-97 with cumulative benefit and debarred for one year w.e.f. 8-7-98 was justified ? If not , what relief the said workman is entitled ? "

2. On receipt of the reference , the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the union, " State Bank Karmachari Sena" ( " the union " in short ) filed the statement of claim on behalf of the workman , Shri P.R. Natu (" the workman " in short ) and the management ofthe State Bank of India ( " Party No. 1 " in short ) filed its written state- ment.

higher appointment and the undertaking of the party no . 1 before the ALC , Chandrapur in the conciliation proceeding in that regard . It is further pleaded by the union that on 1-07-1998 , orders were issued to some employees in regard to incadre higher appointments in Nanded region to posts like teller, head clerk and Dy. Cash Officer but not in regard to posts of computer operator, even though , options were obtained by party no . 1 from the concerned employees for the post of computer operators vide letter no . 3430 dated 21-08-1997 and the workman , who was working at Nanded Branch was due for promotion on 1-07-1997 under the incadre higher appointment as per his seniority, but the party no . I did not give him promotion on the due date , whereas , his juniors were promoted and posted and on 2-07-1998 , party no . I issued order for promotion of the workman as a teller w.e.f. 1-07-1997 and the promotion order was issued after the lapse of one year and the workman was posted at Basmat Nagar Branch , where there was no vacancy for the post given to him and another employee was already posted there as a teller on 1-07-1997 itself and as such , the posting of the workman atBasmat Nagar Branch on supernumerary capacity and the workman in compliance to the condition of giving acceptance to the promotion order within eight days of receipt of the same , gave his consent , but requested in his consent letter to protect his seniority and for his conversion for the post of computer operator in Nanded in future and for parking/ allowing him to work at Nanded branch in the supernumerary capacity, as one of the posts of teller at Nanded Branch was vacate at that time, but party no. 1 , after a gap of one month gave reply that his acceptance to be a conditional acceptance and therefore debarred him from incadre higher promotion for a year w.e.f. 8-07-1998 and thereby, the workman was debarred from promotion not for a year , but for two years from the date ofhis legitimate promotion due i . e . 1-07-1997 and the request made by the workman , while accepting the promotion was legitimate , genuine and as per the policy and the workman had already suffered as because , party no. I had not given him promotion on the due date and when management rectified there mistake and effected his promotion with retrospective effect from 1-07-1997 , his seniority was required to be restored as requested by him and when there was no vacancy at the place of posting of the workman , there was no harm in accepting his genuine request for allowing him to work at Nanded in the same capacity and when management had already allowed such cases at Nelanga and Kinwat Branch and management by using indiscriminating tactics debarred the workman from promotion and even though options from the eligible employees for computer operator were already obtained, no postings were given to senior eligible employees and allowances were paid to junior employees in the Regional Office and the workman was also deprived The case of the workman as presented by the union in the statement of claim is that the party no . I did not adhere to the norms and policies in promoting the eligible employees in respect of incadre higher appointments , i.e. Head Clerk , Teller, Dy. Cash Officer and Computer Operators and particular senior employees are either being ignored or being harassed by giving indiscriminative behaviour . inspite of the direction of the Hon'ble High 404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 / PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] offor the post of computer operator as he was not given thepromotion in time and intentionally the workman was not given his legitimate right of promotion and postings and for that the union approached to ALC ( C ) , Chandrapur for conciliation , but management did not agree for conciliation and during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings , party no. I issued another order promoting the workman as a senior assistant under the revised promotion policy vide letter dated 24-05-2000 and he was posted at APMC Branch situated at Nanded city w.e.f. 1-04-1999 , but due to pendency of conciliation proceedings , the workman asked the party no . 1 to maintain the status quo and for that the workman was debarred by party no . 1 for promotion for three years w.e.f. 1-04-1999 and therefore , the workman right from 1-07-1997 suffered illegal debarment and deprived from promotion and such facts show the malafide intention of party no . 1 and its indiscriminating promotion policy. The union has made prayer to direct for the promotion of the workman under incadre higher appointment w.e.f. 1-07-1997 with all cumulative benefits and posting at Nanded and suitable compensation.

3. In its written statement , the party no.1 pleaded inter- alia that the dispute is not an industrial dispute, but the same is an individual dispute and there is no general commonality of interest and the alleged issue affects only one workman and as such thedispute doesn't fall within the meaning of Section 2 (K) of the Act and as such , the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the matter. It is further pleaded by party no . 1 that promotion is not a condition of service and it is the management's prerogative to decide the place of posting and as such , the demand of the workman to seek promotion at a particular place is ridicules and the Bank evolved the policy for incadre higher appointments in clerical cadre vide circular no . 61 if 1993-94 dated 12-02-1994 and the said policy was revised from time to time and as per the said policy, the clerical cadre staff are entitled for appointment to post such as head clerk, teller and Dy. Head Cahier etc. carrying a monthly allowance of Rs . 750 per month and for the same the bank has to prepare the seniority list, in accordance with the choice of the zones and sub - zones given by the employee for incadre higher appointment and the employees , who have completed two years of service from the date of appointment in the permanent services have to submit their letter of option of sub - zones to accept incadre higher appointments and according to the letters of options , the seniority list is prepared and according to the said list , appointments in higher cadre are given and a separate list is prepared sub - zone wise, for the incadre higher appointment posts becoming vacant or sanctioned and the employee on the top of the list of a particular sub - zone is appointed to post which is on the top of the list of the posts available in particular sub- zone and the same rule is applied to all the employees in the seniority list and the seniority list of the employees is

co-related with the list of posts available / vacant in the sub- zone , while offering the appointments and if the employee , to whom the incadre higher appointment is givenby the bank , refuses or doesn't respond to the offer of the Bank , he is debarred for getting incadre higher appointment for a period of one year, from the date of his refusal and in cadre higher appointments for the post of computer operator were earlier given to the employees. on the basis of the aptitude test and waiting list was prepared according to the results of the aptitude test and employees were given appointments according to the waiting list ,as and when vacancies arose and aptitude test of the computer operators was dispense with w.e.f. 30-01-1997 . by circular dated 25-04-1997 , butby settlement dated 12-04-1999 , appointments for the computer operators have to be given on the basis of the aptitude test and for that permanent appointments for the post of computer operator inAurangabad Zone , in which Nanded sub - zone comes were withheld due to the objection raised by the circle union and therefore , no permanent appointments for the posts of computer operator had been given to any employee and the first promotion was offered to the workman for the post of teller at Ausa Branch in district of Latur w.e.f. 1-07-1996 ,by letter dated 1-07-1996, but the workman refused to accept the promotion and communicated his refusal to Chief Manager, Nanded Branch , vide his letter dated 1-07-1996 and the said letter was forwarded by the Chief Manager to the Regional Office , Nanded on 3-07-1996 and as per the policy, the workman should have beendebarred for promotion for a period of one year from 1-07-1996, but there was a mistake in recording the date of debarment in the record and instead of recording the date of deparment as 1-07-1996 , the Bank recorded the date as 3-07-1996 , the date of receipt of the letter of refusal of the workman by Regional Office and as such , the workman was debarred for a period of one year from 3-07-1996 to 2-07-1997 and in view of the above facts , while implementing the incadre higher appointment policy from 1-07-1997 the name of the workman got excluded from the eligible employees as the debarment was recorded to have valid up to 2-07-1997 and while considering incadre higher appointments , from 1-07-1998 the Bank consider his representation , which he had given earlier and promoted him with retrospective effect from 1-07-1997 and while offering promotion to the workman , the crucial question came for consideration of the Bank was to which post at a particular centre within the sub- zone , the workmanwas entitled and two options were available with theBank and ifthe Bank would have promoted the workman according to the vacancy available on 1-07-1998 , he would have been promoted as head assistant at Kinwat Branch which is about 120 Kms. from Nanded and considering the appointment of the workman that he was due for promotion from 1-07-1997 and had the workman been promoted on 1-07-1997, then he would have been promoted asteller at Basmat Nagar Branch , which is 25 Kms . from 405 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

for promotion and thereby deprived him of the opportunity of promotion and as such , the action of the management is illegal and debarring the workman for promotion for the period of one year from 08-07-1998 , actually debarred the workman for promotion for 2 years and as such , the said order is also illegal and such facts have been proved by the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the workman and as such , the workman is entitled for the relief asclaimed by him .

Nanded and as such , the workman was posted as a teller atBasmat Nagar Branch in supernumerary capacity, as another employee had already been posted and instead of accepting the promotion , the workman gave the conditional acceptance by letter dated 7-07-1998 , including the demand of his posting in Nanded city only and the conditional acceptance of the workman was not accepted by the Bank and therefore the workman was debarred for a period of one year from 8-07-1998 , which was treated as refusal and accordingly the debarment letter was issued on 16-09-1998 and the workman was offered two promotions as per seniority, but he refused both the promotions . It is further pleaded by the party No. 1 that the carrier path policy came to be implemented by the bank and although the workman was under debarment till 7-7-1999 , he was promoted as a senior assistant w.e.f. 1-4-1999 and was postedat APMC Branch , but the workman refused to accept the promotion by letter dated 27-05-2000 on the alleged ground that it is obligatory to maintain status quo in the matter , as per the orders of conciliating authority and in fact, there was no such order and the workman could have definitely accepted the promotion when the same was given in Nanded city itself and consequences of the refusal of the promotion followed and accordingly the workman was debarred from being considered for promotion for a period of three years from 1-04-1999 to 31-03-2002 and as such , the workman is not entitled to any relief.

6. Per contra , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party No. I that the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute and the same is an individual dispute and as such , the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter and the Bank had given repeated incadre higher appointments to the workman in terms of the policies dated 12-02-1994 and 12-04-1999 and the workman has admitted about the application of the terms and conditions of the said policies to him and the workman refused to accept all such promotions for one or the other reason and infact , the workman who was posted at Nanded city branch did not want to shift anywhere and was only interested to get the incadre higher appointment in the same branch and when the workman refused to accept the promotion he was debarred from promotion for one year from the date of his refusal i.e. from 8-07-1998 to 7-07-1999 and such debarment cannot be said to be for a period of two years and the party No. 1 had not committed any illegality and it had rightly debarred the workman for having refusedto accept incadre higher appointments and therefore the workman is not entitled for any relief.

4.Besides placing reliance on documentary evidence , the workman examined himself as a witness in support of his claim . Party No. 1 did not adduce any oral evidence .

7. The first contention raised by the party No. 1 IS that the dispute is not an Industrial Dispute but an individual dispute and as such , the Tribunal has no jurisdi ion to adjudicate the matter. In support of such contention reliance has been placed on the decisions reported in 2007 IJ CLR 527 ( Garrision Engineer, Utility Batinda Vs. Shri Narinder ) , 1968 LA V I.C. 1259 ( Shri Gopal paper mills Limited Vs. The State of Haryana and others ) and 1965 ILLJ 95 ( Nellal Cotton Mills Tirunelvall V/s . Labour Court Madurai ) .

The examination - in- chief of the workman , on affidavit is reiteration of the facts mentioned in the statement of claim . However, in his cross - examination , the workman has admitted that the union has not passed any resolution for raising the dispute and oral resolution was passed in the executive body of the union . He has further admitted that the terms and conditions of circulars dated 12-02-1994 and 12-04-1999 are applicable to him and he was first promoted w.e.f. 1-07-1996 , but he refused the promotion and he was promoted w.e.f. 1-07-1997 as a teller and he was also promoted as senior assistant from i -04-1999, but he did not accept the promotion and there was no order of the ALC directing to maintain status quo and he was debarred from promotion account of his refusal , for three years from 1-4-1999 to 31-03-2002 and he was again promoted as senior assistant from 1-04-2002 but he did not accept the same .

The Hon'ble Apex Court in the decision reported in 2007 II CLR 527 ( Supra ) have held that , the legal issue of maintainability of the reference is to be decided at first . In view of such direction , it is necessary to decide as to whether the dispute is an Industrial Dispute or an Individual dispute at first . It is well settled that bare sponsoring of individual disputes by union is not enough to make it an Industrial Dispute . On perusal of the reference . the dispute in question is concerned only to an individual workman . There is nothing on record to show that the individual dispute has been converted into collective dispute . The workman has admitted in his evidence that no resolution was passed by the union to espouse the dispute on his behalf. There is noting on record to show that substantial number of members of the union supported the decision of the union to take up the cause 5. As per the written notes of argument submitted by the workman , that the workman was promoted as teller atOusa Branch on 19-06-1996 and as the post was not acceptable to the workman , he refused the promotion and as such , he was debarred from promotion for one year from 1-07-1996 to 30-06-1997 and therefore , he was eligible for promotion on 1-07-1997 , but on 1-07-1997 , Bank wrongly and illegally treated the workman not be eligible 406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 / PAUSA 24, 1933

of the individual worker . In the absence of these circumstances , the dispute sponsored by the union cannot be considered to be a collective dispute . Hence , it is held that the dispute in question is an individual dispute and not an Industrial dispute and as such the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute.

In view of the findings that the dispute is not an industrial dispute, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to go intothe merit ofthe case. Hence, it is ordered :-

ORDER

The dispute is not an industrial dispute and is an individual dispute and as such , the Tribunal had no jurisdiction of adjudicate the dispute and to go into the merit of the case as per the schedule of the reference . The reference is disposed of accordingly .

J. P. CHAND, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 175.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद नं. -1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/1990 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/289/1989- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st December, 2011

S.O. 175. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 76/1990 ) ofthe Central Government Industial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court- 1 Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-12-2011 .

[No. L -20012/289 / 1989 - IR (C - I) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Before The Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad.

In the matter of a reference U/ s. 10 ( 1 )(d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

Reference No. 76 of 1990 .

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery of M/s . BCCL

AND

Theirworkmen

Present : Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] Appearances :

Forthe Employers : Shri H. Nath, Advocate For the Workman : Shri R. K. Lal , Advocate .

State : Jharkhand : Industry, Coal ,

Dated, the 8-12-2011 .

AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012/289 / 89 - IR ( Coal - I ) dated 18-4-1990 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery under Sijua area of M / s . BCCL , in not allowing Smt . Shanti Bhuiyain , Casual Wagon Loader to resume her duty w.e.f. 26-8-1985 is justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2. The case of the concerned workman , Smt . Shanti Bhuiyain (Bhuini ) has been working in Sendra Bansjora Colliery as a Casual Wagon Loader. She fell sick from 2-10- 83 and reported her sickness to the management . In course of treatment it was found that she was suffering from Tuberculosis and was rendered totally incapable of working as a Wagon Loader . After prolonged treatment and recovery from her illness she reported for duty to the management of the Colliery on 26-8-85 with due medical certificate . But she was not allowed to join her duty and was informed that she was transferred to Nichitpur Colliery in October, 1983 and released from Sendra Bansjora Colliery. She was not given the alleged transfer order nor the release order to enable her to join work at Nichitpur colliery nor she was allowed to join work at Sendra Bansjora Colliery. After a lapse of about two years the management of Sendra - Bansjora Colliery issued a charge- sheet dated 29/ 30-10-87 alleging absence without information . The concerned workman submitted her reply on 9-11-83 from 2-10-83 . It has been stated that the management made a formal enquiry which was neither fair nor proper. The Dy. C.P.M. of Sijua area issued a note that the workman was found guilty of the misconduct of absence and to inform the workman that since she left her job ofher own it would not be possible to take her back in employment . The Dy. C.M.E. , Sendra Bansjora Colliery, however, in his comments before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad , stated that the dismissal of the workman was confirmed by the competent authority. But no dismissal order was served upon her. The action of the management in not allowing Smt . Shanti Bhuini to resume her duty w.e.f. 26-8-85 is not justified, and the concerned workman is entitled to get the relief of reinstatement in her post 407 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

without information from 2-10-83 to which she submitted her reply dated 9-11-83 .

with back wages and benefits from 26-8-85 onwards .

It has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award in favour of the concerned workman.

Management's witness MW- 1 , Chandra Mouli Singh , who was Enquiry Officer , stated that he conducted the enquiry and recorded the evidence of the management witnesses in presence of the concerned workman and she was afforded opportunity to cross - examine those witness . She was afforded opportunity to give her statement and to adduce the evidence. After enquiry he submitted enquiry in which he found that the charge against the concerned workman was estabished. When she was absent without any reason so much long time and after enquiry which shows that the management had given fair opportunity to the concerned workman to adduce evidence, but nothing has been done. It shows that the concerned workman has , by his own will , taken the plea forsick.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances I hold that the action of the management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery under Sijua area of M / s . BCCL, in not allowing Smt . Shanti Bhuiyain ( Bhuini ), Casual Wagon Loader to resume her duty w.e.f. 26-8-1985 is justified and hence the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

ThisismyAward.

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 21 दिसम्बर , 2012

का.आ. 176. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. एवं के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , धनबाद नं. -1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 29/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को02-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/25/2007-आई. आर. (सी-1 ) ] डी. एस. एस. श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st December , 2011 3. The case of the management is that the concerned workman was a casual workman and was employed as a casual wagon loader. It has been submitted that loading ofcoal in wagon is a job of casual nature depending upon supply ofwagons which is very irregular and erratic . There was no requirement of casual wagon loader at Sendra Bansjora colliery, she along with other casual wagon loaders , was transferred to Nichitpur colliery by order dated 27-9-83 , and subsequently released from duty from Sendra Bansjora colliery by order dated 3-10-83 .All the workmen, who were so transferred , excepting Smt . Shanti Bhuini , resumed duty at Nichitpur colliery. But the concerned workman did not report for duty at that colliery. She continued to remain absent from duty without leave , information and permission and absented from duty for more than ten days since 2-10-83 . She was issued a charge- sheet 29/30-10-87 for remaining absent from duty since 2-10-83 . She replied to the chargesheet on 9-11-87. Thereafter an enquiry was held by the Enquiry Officer, C. M. Singh , Sr. P.O. who made departmental enquiry in accordance with the principles of natural justice in which she fully participated and she was found guilty of the charges . The Enquiry Officer submitted his report . The enquiry report was examined at various level and the management concurred with the findings of the Enquiry Officer that the charges levelled against the concerned workman has been fully established. Accordingly she was dismissed from service , after obtaining the approval of the competent authority . It has been denied that she was not allowed to resume duty w.e.f. 20-8-1985 . Since she was a casual wagon loader, the question ofallowing her to resume duty did not arise.

In rejoinder the management has stated almost same things as have been stated in its written statement .

4. The domestic enquiry has been held fair and propervide order dated 3-5-95.

S.O. 176. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 29/2008) ofthe Central Government Industial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court- 1 , Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL, and their workman , which wasreceived by the Central Government on 21-12-2011 .

5. The management produced MW- 1 . But cross- examination of MW-1 was not done because the concerned workman was not present inspite of several notices were given . The documents filed by the management have been marked Exts . M - 1 to M -6 .

[No. L- 20012/25 /2007- IR (C- I) ] D. S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

6. No verbal argument was advanced on behalf of theeither party.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I, DHANBAD. Inthe matter of a reference under section 10 ( 1 )(d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . Reference No. 29 of 2008 .

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Western Jharia Area of M/ s . BCCL Written argument has been filed on behalf of the concerned workman . It has been stated on behalf of the concerned workman in their written argument that the management illegally stopped the concerned workman from duty, when she became sick in 1983 and the management issued charge- sheet dated 29 /30-10-87 alleging absence 408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] AND

New Delhi , the 21st December, 2011 Their workman

Present : Shri Hari Mangal Singh , Presiding Officer

Appearances :

For the Management Shri D. K. VERMA , Advocate

For the Union

S.O. 177.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Jaipur, now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

: Shri D. MUKHERJEE, Secretary, BiharColliery Kamgar Union.

[No. L- 17012/34/2000- IR ( B - II ) ] State : Jharkhand :

Industry: Coal

SHEESH RAM , Section Officer Dated, the 9-12-2011 .

ANNEXURE

AWARD

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

Present : N. K. Purohit, Presiding Officer

Case No. 35/2001

By Order No.L -- 20012/25/ 2007- IR ( CM - I ) , dated 3-6- 2008 , the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

Reference No. L- 17012/34/2000- IR (B - II )

SCHEDULE

dtd. 8-5-2001

Sh . Nand Kishore Sharma , S/ o Sh . N. L. Sharma R/ o H. No. 786 , Ban Walon Ka Dharwaja, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur ( Raj .)

"Whether the action of the management of Murlidih 20/21 Pits Colliery of M/s . BCCL , in not regularizing the services of Shri Nizamuddin Khan , Pump Operator as Mechanical Fitter is legal and justified ? To what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? "

V/ s .

The Sr. Divisional Manager , LIC of India, Bhawani Singh Road , Jeevan Prakash Building , Jaipur ( Rajasthan) -302006

Present:

2. In this case Shri D. Mukherjee , Secretary of the Union alongwith the concerned workman appeared on 26-05-2011 and filed a petition duly signed by the concerned workman stating therein that the concerned workman is not interested to contest the case and as such a prayer has been made to pass an order allowing to withdraw the claim made by the union /workman.

Sh . R. C. Jain .

For the Applicant :

For the non - applicant: Sh. J. K.Agrawal .

AWARD

3. In view of such prayer made on behalf of the concerned workman , I pass a ' No Dispute ' award in this reference case .

11-10-2011

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर , 2011

1. The Central Government in exercise ofthe powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred the Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication which is as under :-

का.आ. 177.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 35/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the claim of Shri Nand Kishore Sharma S/o Shri Narsingh Lal Sharma that he was engaged during the period from 25-4-1985 to 1991 on daily wage basisby the management of LIC of India, Jaipur is correct and if so"

[सं. एल-17012/34/2000- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of LIC in terminating the services of Shri Nand Kishore Sharma

Ins 409 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

4. क्या औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के प्रावधान विपक्षी संस्थान के नियमों पर लागू नहीं होते हैं ?

w.e.f. 1-4-1991 and not giving re -employment under section 25 G of the I.D. Act , 1947 isjustified ? If not , what relief the disputant is entitled and from what date?"

है ? 5. क्या प्रार्थी सेवा में पुनः नियुक्त किए जाने का अधिकारी

6. In evidence , the workman has filed his affidavit on 29-9-2004 whereas the management has filed the counter affidavit of Sh . M.L. Chaudhary, Manager ( legal ) on 4-1-05 in support of their respective case .

7. The point- wise discussion follows as under:- Point No. 1 .

8. The questions under consideration are whether during period 25-4-85 to 31-1-91 the workman had worked under the employment of the non - applicant and had worked for 240 days in the year 1987 and 1988 and whether his alleged termination is in violation of Section 25 - F of the I.D. Act .

2.The workman in his claim statement has pleaded that he was engaged by the non - applicant Corporation as waterman/ class IV on 25-4-85 . He had worked for more than 240 days in the year 1987 and 1988 despite this his services have been orally terminated by the non - applicant Corporation in the violation of section 25 - F of the I.D. Act . The workman has also pleaded that as per decision in special appeal no . 10393/92 those workmen who had worked up to 20-5-85 for a specific period as per scheme formulated inthis regard were required to be given regular appointment after screening . But the management has not given him regular appointment whereas other workmen have been given appointments in the light of said decision .The workman has alleged that the non - applicant has also violated the provisions u/s 2 -G and 25 -H of the I.D. Act . The workman has prayed for his reinstatement with back wages and all consequential benefits .

9. To attract the provisions of section 25 -F of I.D. Act one of the conditions required is that the workman isemployed in any industry for a continuous period which would not be less than one year .

10. The expression " continuous period" occur in section 25 - F has been defined in section 25 -B of the I.D. Act. Under sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 25 ( B ) , if a workman has put in uninterrupted service of establishment including the service which may interrupted on account of sickness , authorize leave , accident, a strike which is not illegal , a lock out or secession of work that is not due to any fault on the part of the workman shall be said to be in continuous service for one year i.e. 12 months in respect of number of days he has actually worked with interrupted service permissible under sub-section ( 1) of section 25 (B) .

3. In reply, the non - applicant Corporation has denied the claim of the workman . The non - applicant has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability ofthe claim on the ground of inordinate delay in raising the dispute. It has been pleaded that the workman was engaged as waterman on contract basis as and when required who had not worked for 240 days in any calendar year. It has been denied that workman is entitled to be appointed as regular employee in the light of decision of the Hon'ble Apex court. It has also been denied that after termination ofthe workman any junior to him has been engaged by the non- applicant . Since , the provisions of section 25 - F, Gand H , and Rule 77 and 78 have not been violated, the claim of the workman deserves to be rejected .

4. In rejoinder, the workinan has pleaded that validity of his termination was challenged by him in writ petition No. 5345/91 but later on he withdrew the said writ petition in the year 1996 for making representation to the Corporation for considering his case in the light of decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court .

5. On 26-8-02 following points for determination were framed :---

11. Sub - section (2 ) of section 25(B) of the I.D. Act says that even if a workman has not been in continuous service for a period of one year as envisaged under sub-section ( 1 ) of 25( B) of I.D. Act, he shallbe deemed to have been in such continuous service for a period of one year if he has actually worked under the employer for 240 daysin preceding period of twelve months from the date of his termination . The said sub - section provides for a fictionto treat a workman in continuous service for a period of one year despite the fact that he has not rendered uninterrupted service for a period of one year. In 1981 Lab IC 806 Hon'ble Apex Court has elaborated the mode to invoke the said fiction as follows :-

1. क्या प्रार्थी श्रमिक की नियुक्ति दिनांक 25-4-85 को विपक्षी संस्थान द्वारा की गई , जिसने क्लेम विवरण के पद संख्या 1 में वर्णित अवधि के अनुसार कार्य किया व वर्ष 1987 एवं 1988 में 240 दिवस से अधिक कार्य किया ?

2. क्या विपक्षी संस्थान द्वारा प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ कर्मचारियों की पुनः नियुक्ति कर धारा 25 - एच औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के प्रावधान का उल्लंघन किया गया है?

" In order to invoke the fiction enacted in sub-section (2)( a) , it is necessary to determine first the relevant date , i.e. , the date of termination of service which iscomplained of a ' retrenchment ' . After that date is ascertained , move backward to a period of 12 months just preceding the date of retrenchment and then ascertain whether within the period of 12 months , the workman has 3. क्या क्लेम विवरण अत्याधिक समयावधि के बाहर होने के कारण निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है?

2GI/12-19 410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] rendered service for a period of 240 days . If these three facts are affirmatively answered in favour of the workman, pursuant to the deeming fiction enacted in sub - section 2(a) , it will have to be assumed that the workman is in continuous service for a period of one year, and he will satisfy the eligibility qualification enacted in Section 25F."

12. In the background of the legal provisions and principles set out above factual scenario in the present case is to be examined .

13. The initial burden was on the workman to prove that he had remained under the employment of the Corporation as a workman for a continuous period of at least one year as envisages u/s 25- F of the I.D. Act . Therefore , his termination without notice or compensation in lieu of notice was in violation of the said section .

non-applicant but despite directions to the non - applicant for production of required documents vide order dated 24-3-2005 and 24-5-2010, the Corporation did not produce them and plea was taken that the documents being 20 years old had been destroyed . Since , the workman had challenged the termination order just after his termination in writ petition filed before the High Court and this fact was in the knowledge of the non - applicant, the plea taken by the non- applicant cannot be relied upon . He has furthermore contended that in cross examination the management witness himself has admitted that he did not peruse the record pertaining to the case and affidavit has been submitted by him on the basis of reply therefore , his evidence is not based on any record . The learned representative on behalf of the workman has urged that in reply to the claim statement there is no plea on behalf of the management that having worked in different branches total working days of the workman cannot be taken into consideration for determining continuous service therefore , in absence of pleadings , the contention on behalf ofthe Corporation in this regard is not sustainable . He has further urged that the contention on behalf of the Corporation is contrary to the definition of employer under section 2( g) of the I.D. Act .

17. The learned representative has submitted that from the deposition of the workman and documents Ex. W- 1 to Ex - W- 20 it is well established that workman had worked during period 25-4-85 to 29-3-91 . In support of his contention he has relied on 1998 ( 2) WLC( 72 ) , 2001 ( 89) FLR 32 , 2010 LAB IC 1089 and 2006 ( 1 ) WLC 302 , 2002 WLC (UC) 566 Raj . H.C.

14. The workman in his affidavit has deposed that he was engaged as a daily wager by the non - applicant on 25-4-85 and he had worked under the non - applicant during period 25-4-85 to 31-3-91 as per particulars given in the documents Ex . 1 to Ex . 21 but his services have been terminated on 1-4-91 without any notice or compensation in lieu of notice in violation of the provision of section 25 -F. In cross examination he has admitted that he had worked at the different branches of the non- applicant during said period and he has been paid for the period he actually worked. He has also admitted that Ex.W- 1 and Ex. 4 to Ex. 21 are type copies and Ex . W-4 , 8 , 9 , 12 and 16 are not documents of the Corporation and have been preparedby him .

18. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf of the Corporation has submitted that admittedly the workman had worked in different branches of the Corporation therefore ; his total working days cannot be taken into consideration for determining continuous service . He has further submitted that the workman has not worked for 240 days in preceding 12 months from the date of his termination therefore , provisions of Section 25 -F are not applicable. In support of his contention reliance has been placed on 2010 ( 2 ) WLC 675 and AIR 2005 SC 660.

15.The management witness Sh . M. L. Chaudhary, Manager, has deposed in his affidavit that he was engaged for filling water on contract basis on need basis as and whenrequired . He was never engaged in any capacity by the non - applicant . The workman did not work for 240days in any year. In cross examination he has admitted that he has given his affidavit on the basis of reply filed on behalf of the management and the record was not perused by him at the time of filing his affidavit in evidence . He has stated that record pertaining to the workman was destroyed but he could not state when it was destroyed.

19. I have given my thoughtful consideration on the rival submissions on behalf of both the sides and scanned the relevant documents placed on record.

20. The workman in his affidavit has stated that he had worked as daily wager during period 25-4-85 to 31-3-91 under the non - applicant and the particulars ofthe working days during said period have been mentioned in his documents Ex . W- 1 to Ex . W-21 .

21. The workman in his claim statement has categorically mentioned that he had worked as per details givenin para I of his claim statement . As per para 1 the 16. The learned representative on behalf of the workman has contended that the workman had worked continuously under the employment of the non - applicant during period 25-4-85 to 31-3-91 despite this his services have been terminated on 1-4-91 in violation of provision ofsection 25- F of the I.D. Act . He has further contended that though it has been pleaded on behalf of the Corporation that the workman was engaged on contract basis for filling water but no documents pertaining to contract has been produced. He has also contended that vide application dated 31-1-2005, 30-1-2005 and 20-1-2006 the workman made request to call for documents from the 411

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

totalworking days of the workman during period 25-4-85 to 31-3-91 are as under :--

Year

Total working days Period as per para 1 of the claim statement

1985 25-4-85 to 22-6-85 14-10-85 to 17-10-85

59 days 63 days 4days

1986 15-4-86 to 31-7-86 4-8-86 to 11-8-86

120 days

108 days

24-11-86 to 27-11-86 8days 4days

1987

198 days

1988

203 days

1989

49days

1990

122 days

1991

69 days

22. As per his pleadings in para 2 of the claim statements after including weekly holidays the total working days in the year 1987 & 1988 were more than 240days.

23. The workman in his affidavit has stated that he had worked during the period 25-4-85 to 31-3-91 as per details given in Ex. W- 1 to Ex. W-21 . Documents Ex . W- 1 to Ex.W- 3 , Ex . W- 5 , Ex . W-6 and Ex - W- 7 , Ex. W- 10 , Ex. W- 11 , Ex . W- 13 to 15 and Ex. W- 17 are type copies of the certificates said to be given by Branch Managers at the relevant time . Ex. W- 4 , Ex . W- 8 , Ex . W- 9 , Ex . W- 12 , Ex. W- 16 are chart prepared by the workman himself showing the working days in the year 1986 , 1987 , 1988 , 1989 and 1990 respectively.

24. As per certificates produced by the workman , he had worked during period mentioned below:

Documents Period

Total working days Ex . W- 1

25-4-85 to 22-6-85

59 days Ex . W-2/ 5

15-4-86 to 3-6-86

49days 4-8-86 to 11-8-86

Ex. W-3

8 days 2-6-86 to 31-7-86

Ex. W-6

60 days Ex. W-7

4-8-86, 11-8-86 ,

7 days 24-11-86 to 27-11-86, and 6-3-87

1-3-88 to 19-4-88

Ex . W- 10

49 days 1

3 Ex-W- 11

17-6-88 to 20-8-88

49days Ex-W- 13

1-1-89 to 31-12-89

24days Ex-W-14

56days 27-5-89 to 31-5-89 1-6-89 to 26-6-89 1-7-89 to 25-7-89

Ex-W-15

8days 28-11-89 to 30-11-89 1-12-89,2-12-89, 5-12-89, 6-12-89 &7-12-89

Ex. W-17

43 days 20-7-90 to 31-7-90 1-8-90 to 31-8-90

Ex. W-19

9days 12-10-90,20-10-90, 25-10-90 to 27-10-90 , 29-10-90 to 31-10-90

25. As per chart Ex . W-4 , Ex. W- 8 , Ex - W- 9 , Ex -W- 12 Ex. W- 16, the workman has worked during year 1986 , 1987, 1988 , 1989 , 1990 for period 126 days , 196 days , 203 days , 142 days and 300 days respectively.

26. Admittedly, these charts are not documents of management and the same have been prepared by the workman himself. The total number of days shown in the said chart for respective period is different from the period mentioned in the para I of the claim statement. In pleadings he himself has admitted that total number of working days in the year 1990 were 122 days only whereas inEx- 16 chart prepared by him he has shown 300 working days in the year 1990. Thus , the number of the working daysfiguring therefrom cannot be relied upon.

27. In remaining documents Ex - W- 18 isbonus calculation sheet for the year 1989-90 . Ex - W-20 dated 11-10-90 is requisition form for stationary . Ex - W- 21 is a letter wherein approval was sought for appointment of the workman as temporary peon against leave vacancy. These documents are not relevant for reckoning the actual working days of the workman.

28.As per chart of working days Ex . W- 4 , Ex - W- 8 , Ex. W- 9 , Ex. W- 12 , and Ex . W- 16 the workman had worked indifferent branches . 2010 ( 2 ) WLC 675 Raj . H.C. , it has been held that workman having worked in different branches his total working cannot be taken into consideration for determining continuous service . In AIR 2005 SC 660 Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that number ofdays ofwork put in by the workman in broken periods cannot be taken as continuous employment for purposes ofSection 25 - F.

29. The workman in his cross examination has admitted that he had worked in different branches . It is also evident from the chart of working days submittedby him that he had worked in different branches therefore , working days in different branches cannot be taken into consideration for determining continuous service . Even if the working days of the workman in all the branches are 412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

taken into consideration , it is not established that the workman had worked uninterruptedly in any year or he hadworked for 240 days during preceding 12 months from the alleged date of his termination i.e. 1-4-91 .

30. The learned representative on behalf of the workman has contended that the management has not produced documents as per directions given by the Tribunal vide its orders dated 14-3-05 & 24-5-10 therefore , adverse inference should be drawn against the management. Controverting it , the learned representative for the management has urged that documents being 20 years old had been destroyed as per circular dated 20-3-96 therefore ; adverse inference cannot be drawn against the management for non - production of the documents .

31. It is well settled that if a party despite possession of the best evidence had not produced the same, the court may or may not presume that it would have gone against the same . Adverse inference may be drawn if a party in possession of the documents deliberately withheld such documents or despite direction by a court the documentary evidence is withheld.

32. In present case , on perusal ofthe record it reveals that on 31-1-05 an application was filed by the workman to call for certain documents from the management . The application was disposed of vide order dated 14-3-05 with following observations :

"Thus , inspite of the facts that it has been earlier disclosed on behalf of the non- applicant that the connected record is not available with the management , surprisingly, the workman has now at a delayed stage urged to call upon the corporation to produce such documents and such submission is devoid of any substance which cannot be maintained . The Ld . Representative in support of his submission has drawn my attention towards the decisions reported in 2001 (2) LLJ 199 & 1992 ( 2) WLC 46. But their facts do not bear resemblance with the controversy on hand and the Ld . Representative does not gain any assistance from them. However , the workman has also sought that the circular dated 20-3-96 containing the instruction to destroy the old record be summoned from the non - applicant , which the Ld. Representative for the non- applicant assures to file on the next date. He is accordingly directed to produce it on the next date . The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid manner .

33. Subsequently, the workman moved another application on 20-1-06 along with photocopies of certain documents & request was made for taking the same on record . It was also requested that original of the said documents be called for from the management . This application was partly allowed vide order dated 25-5-10 & directions were given for production of the original documents mentioned at serial no. 3 & 4 of the application

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] i.e. application of the workman dated 26-10-87 & copies of gate passes of certain dates.

34. The management has not produced the original gate passes on the ground of non -availability of old record but the copies gate passes have been produced by the workman . Upon perusal of the copies it reveals that gate passes are pertaining to dates 4-5-87 , 19-9-87 , 9-12-87, 4-1-90, 10-3-88 & 22-4-88 only.

35. In view ofthe orders dated 14-3-05 & 25-5-10 in respect of the applications of the workman dated 31-1-05 & 20-1-06 respectively, it cannot be said that despite direction of the Tribunal the management has intentionally withheld the documents . The facts of the decisions referred to by the learned representative on behalf of the workman are distinguishable . Thus , the contention on behalf of the workman for drawing adverse inference against the management for non-production of the document is not sustainable .

36. It is evident from the documents Ex - 1 to Ex - 21 that, the workman had worked for intermittent period only. It is also evident from the working days shown by the workman in his claim statement that he had not worked " uninterruptedly " during years 1987 & 1988 or any year as per Section 25 ( b ) ( 1 ) of the I.D. Act .

37. The workrnan has pleaded that he had worked for 198 days & 203 days in the year 1987 & 1988 respectively & after including weekly holidays his total working days comes to more than 240 days . But weekly holidays of the whole year cannot be taken into consideration while reckoning total working days during any calendar year. Only those weekly holidays which fell during periodthe workman had actually worked can only be considered . Thus , the workman has failed to establish that he had workel for more than 240 days in the years 1987 & 1988 .

38. Though in his pleadings he has not mentioned any date of termination but in his affidavit he has alleged that his services were terminated on 1-4-91 . Admittedly, as perpleadings in his claim statement the total working days in the year 1990 & 1991 are 122 days & 69 days only. Thus , itisevident from pleadings in para 1 of the claim statement that the workman had not worked for at least 240 days during preceding 12 months from the date of his termination as envisaged u/ s 25-( b ) (2 ) .

39. In view of the above discussion , the workman has failed to establish that he had worked continuously for one year as envisaged u/ s 25 - F of the I.D. Act . Therefore , provisions of Section 25 - F are not attracted. Accordingly, this point is decided against the workman . Point no . ' II

40.It ispertinent to mention that earlier it was pointed outby the parties that in reference order Section 25 -G has been mentioned instead of Section 25 - H therefore , in 413 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

withdrew the same in the year 1996. The copy of the reply filedbythe non -applicant in writ petition 5345/91 has been placed on record by the workman . In view of the above facts the contention on behalf of the non - applicant is not sustainable and this point is decided against the non- applicant.

Point No. IV

reference Section 25 -G out to have been replaced by Section 25 - H in terms of reference . Vide order dated 14-5-04 it has already been held that the dispute also relates to the reemployment of the workman after whose termination it is alleged that new hands were recruited . It clearly refers to the violation of provision u/ s 25 -H instead of Section 25 -G which appears to be a typographical error that25 - G has been mentioned in place of 25 - H and it was concedes on behalf of the parties that if the word section 25 -G are read as 25 - H , they have no objection .

41. The workman in his affidavit has stated that at the time of termination junior to him were working but there is no such pleading in his statement ofclaim . He has not disclosed the names of those persons who were junior to him therefore , he has failed to establish that any junior to him was retained while terminating of his service in violation of Section 25 - G of the I.D. Act .

48. It has been contended on behalf of the non- applicant that the provision of Industrial Disputes Act are not applicable in the matter under non - applicant's Rules . In this regard , he has relied on AIR 1994 SC 1343 . Controverting it , the learned representative for the workman has urged that Life Insurance Corporation is an ' industry' and the applicant is workman as defined u/ s 2 therefore , provisions of 1.D. Act are applicable . In this regard, he has referred decisions 2008 ( 118 ) FLR 1189 , 2002( 1 ) LLN 305 .

49. I have given my thoughtful consideration on submissions of both the sides .

42. The workman has alleged that after termination ofhis service new hands have been recruited by the non- applicant . The management witness has denied this fact that new hands were recruited after tennination of the services of the workman .

43. Neither in the pleadings nor in his affidavit the workman has disclosed the name of any person said to be recruited after his termination . In cross -examination he has admitted that he did not remember the names of the persons who were given employment after his termination . Thus, the workman has failed, to prove that any fresh hand was recruited after his termination in violation of Section 25 - H of the I.D.Act.

50. In AIR 1994 SC 1343 in contract of employment the LIC was entitled not to confirm probationer in case he fails to achieve target fixed in this regard for his performance . The services of the probationer were terminated without any notice on the said ground . Hon'ble Apex Court held that such termination being effected under stipulation contend in contract read with Regulation 14 is not retrenchment within Section 2 (00 ) of the I.D. Act . Further, Regulation framed under 48 (2 ) ( 00 ) of the L.I.C. Act have overriding effect over provision of I.D. Act. The facts of this case are distinguishable .

44. In view of above , this point is also decided against the workınan .

Point No. III .

51. In 2008 ( 118 ) FLR 1189 Hon'ble Apex Court has held that LIC is a " state " within the meaning ofArticle 12 of the constitution of India. It duties and functions are provided for under the 1956 Act . The same by itself, however, having regard to the definition of " industry " as contained in Section 2(j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, cannot take within a umbrage the functions of the Life Insurance Corporation outside its purview.

52. In view of the legal proposition laid down in decision supra, it cannot be said that the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act are not applicable in the present matter. Accordingly, this point is decided against the non-applicant .

Point No. V.

45. The learned representative on behalf of the Corporation submitted that the claim of the workman deserves to be rejected on the sole ground of inordinate delay in raising the dispute . Controverting it, the learned representative for the workman has contended that the workman earlier filed a writ petition against his termination. Later on he withdrew his petition on 4-7-1996 . Thereafter, the workman raised the industrial dispute before wrong forum i.e. Labour Department of the State Government. Therefore , delay has been explained by the workman, further, the claim ofthe workman cannot be rejected merely on the ground of delay. In this respect he has relied on 1970(20 ) FLR 297 , 2001 ( 90) FLR 754 , 2006 SCC ( L& S) 702, 2005 (4 ) WLC 90 , 2011 ( 128 ) FLR 121 .

46. It is settled position that claim of the workman cannot be rejected merely on the ground of delay. Only inordinate delay is fatal and the delay can be considered while granting relief.

47. The workman has pleaded that earlier he filed a writpetition challenging his termination but later on he

53. It has been contended that as per the decision of the Apex court in special appeal 13093/92 the workman was entitled to be reappointed but copy of such decision has not been placed on the record . Further , in view of the terms of the reference under adjudication , the question regarding entitlement of the workman for appointment as per decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court is beyond the scope of the reference .

414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

54. Since , point No. I & II have been decided against the workman and he has failed to prove that alleged action of the management in terminating his services was in violation of Section 25 - F and has also failed to prove that any fresh hand junior to him was employed in violation of provision of Section 25 - H , the workman is not entitled for his reinstatement .

55. In view of the finding on point No. I , II & V, it is held that alleged action of the management was not in violation of Section 25 - F & 25 - H, of the I.D. Act . Resultantly, the workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

56. Award as above .

57. Let a copy of the award be sent to Central Government u / s 17 ( 1 ) for publication .

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 178. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी/80/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -17012 /12/2001- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2011 S.O. 178. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Governinent hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT/ NGP /80/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 21-11-2011.

[No. L- 17012/ 12/2001 - IR(B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J. P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER- CGIT-CUM -LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No. CGIT /NGP /80/2001

Date: 27-09-2011 .

PartyNo. 1 : The Sr. Divisional Manager , LI C of India , Divisional Office , Jeevan Prakash , Shri Krushna Peth , Amravati (M.S.)444601

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

Versus

PartyNo. 2 : Shri Santosh S /o . Babulal Tak R/ o . Navlababa ward, Tah-Pusad Distt . Yavatmal ( M.S. )

AWARD

(Dated: 27th September, 2011 )

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) ( " the Act " in short), the Central Government had referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman Shri Santosh Babulal Tak , for adjudication , as per letter No. L- 17012/12/ 2001 - IR(B - II ) dated Nil , with the following schedule :-

"Whether the action of the management in relation to Pusad Branch . of LIC of India to terminate Shri Santosh Babulal Tak wet sweeper from service vide order no . Ref. 98-A/05 dated 10-06-2000 is legal and justified? Ifnot, what relief is the workman is entitled to ? "

2.On receipt ofthe reference , parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement , in response to which , the workman , Shri Santosh Babulal Tak (" the workman " in short ) filed the statement of claim andthe management of Life Insurance Corporation of India ("party no.1 " in short ) filed the written statement .

Adumbrated in brief, the case of the workman as projected in the statement of claim is that he worked as a wetsweeper with party no . 1 at Pusad branch office from 26-09-1991 to 18-06-2000 continuously without any break and his services were terminated by the party no . 1 as per the termination order dated 18-06-2000 w.e.f. 16-06-2000 , butactually he rendered service till 18-06-2000 and as such, the order of termination with retrospective effect is illegal and before the termination of his services , the provisions ofSection 25 -F ofthe Act were no complied with and neither one month's notice nor one month's pay in lieu of notice nor retrenchment compensation was paid to him and therefore, the termination is illegal and though he submitted number of applications for regularization of his services , his services were not regularized and the post in which he was working is still vacant and as such , there is no hindrance to reinstate him in services and the party no . 1 did not publish any seniority list , seven days before the termination of his service and thus violated Rule - 77 ofthe Industrial Disputes (Central ) Rules ' and keeping the post ofwet sweeper vacant for years together by the party no . 1 is illegal and he being the senior most employee is entitled for appointment as a regular wet sweeper.

The workman has prayed to declare the order of termination ofhis services dated 18-06-2000 to be illegal and for reinstatement in service with continuity and fullback wages.

415 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

3. It is necessary to mention here that as the party no . I neither filed the written statement nor contested the case, on 12-03-2002 , award was passed in favour of the workman ex-parte . However, the party no. 1 filed an application to set aside the ex- parte award dated 12-03-2002 and as per orders dated 27-04-2005 ; the. ex- parte award was set aside . On 30-08-2005 , the party no . 1 filed the written statement .

4. The party no. 1 in its written statement has pleaded inter- alia that the workman worked at Pusad branch office ofLIC of India from 26-06-1991 to February 1993 as a wet sweeper for one hour every day on the working days only on casual basis and he was engaged for two hours daily from March 1993 to 13-06-2000 , on casual basis and his services were discontinued vide the communication dated 18-06-2000 and the workman did not work till 18-06-2000 and the notice was not retrospective and as the workman was working on casual basis , there was no necessity of giving him notice in advance for discontinuation of his services or one month's pay in lieu of notice and there was no question of regularizing of the services of the workman as he was engaged on casual basis and no post of wet sweeper is vacant in Pusad branch of LIC and a regular parttime sweeper in Pusad branch office has already been employed to carry out wet as well as dry sweeping of the office and there is no vacancy and the workman is not entitled to any relief.

Itis further pleaded by the party no . 1 that Life Insurance Corporation of India (" LI C" in short) is a body corporate established under the provision of section 3 if the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 (" Insurance Act " in short) and in accordance with the provisions of section 23(1) of the Insurance Act , it is empowered to engage such number of employees as it deems fit to carry out its functions and business and under section 48 of the Insurance Act , the Central Govemment is empowered to make rules in respect of the aforesaid enactment and in accordance with the provisions of section 49 of the Insurance Act, LIC has framed regulations which are known as Life Insurance Corporation of India ( Staff) Regulations , 1960 (" the Regulations " in short) and section 49 of the Insurance Act before its amendment by the amended Act of 1981 , empowered the LIC to make regulation providing for the terms and conditions of services of the employees ofLIC including the transferred employees and accordingly, the LIC framed the regulations and as a consequence of theAmendment Act among others , the Central Government was empowered to make rules to provide for the terms and conditions ofservices of the employees of LIC, vide clause (cc) of sub -section 2 of section 48 and the Regulations and other provisions in force , immediately before the commencement of the Amendment Act shall be deemed to be the Rules made by the Central Govemment under section 48(2) ( cc) and ( c) and the Rules made by the Central Govemment shall have the effect notwithstanding anything

contained in, among others , the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 or any other law for the time being in force and the Regulations are having statutory effect and thus the Regulations are having overriding effect notwithstanding anything contained in the Act or any other enactment , settlement or award for the time being in force and Regulation 4 of the Regulations empowers the Chairman of LIC to issue instructions from time to time to carry out the provisions of the Regulations and Regulation 8 ( 1 ) of the Regulations provides that , Notwithstanding anything contained in these Regulations , a Divisional Manager may employ staff in class III and IV on a temporary basis subject to such general or special directions as may be issued by theChairman from time to time and according to Regulation 8(2) , " no person appointed under sub - regulation ( 1 ) shall only by reason of such appointment be entitled to absorption in the service of LIC or claim preference for recruitment to any post ' and the Chairman of LIC has accordingly issued instructions , providing for amongst others, the appointment of part time sweeper in the offices ofthe corporation . The party no.1 has also pleaded that as perthe instructions issued by the Chairman in pursuance ofRegulation 4, a sweeper could be appointed on part time and temporary basis for a duration of two hours , three hours or four hours per day, if the sweepable area is less than 4000 Sq . ft , between 4000 Sq .ft . to 5000 Sq . ft . and more than 5000 Sq.ft respectively and the workman appointed on regular part time basis are entitled to certain benefits and privileges and they are appointed following the procedure of recruitment as applicable to whole time salaried employees of LIC and as per the instructions , one Shri K.R. Kare was appointed as part time sweeper w.e.f. 14-08-1986 for two hours per day and as Pusad Branch Office was shifted to its own premises , where the seeepable area exceeded 5000 Sq . ft , working hours of Shri Kare were increased to four hours per day w.e.f. 15-02-1993 and Shri Kare is still employed at Pusad branch office as regular part time sweeper carrying out the job of both wet and dry sweeping and the workman was engaged for carrying out the work of wet sweeping w.e.f. 26-06-1991 on a casual basis by the officers of the said branch taking into account thedifficulties faced by the branch office locally and as the workman was not appointed as a regular part time employee , theprocedure of appointment of regular part time employee was not followed in his case and neither any appointment letter was issued to him nor any salary roll number was allotted to him and as the workman was not appointed on regular basis , by following the requisite procedure of recruitment, as stipulated in the Regulations , he has no vested right to continue in the said post and accordingly, hisservices were discontinued vide communication dated 18-06-2000 and his discontinuation from services did not attract the provisions of the Act and, therefore , there was no question of compliance of the provisions of section 25-F and 25 - G of the Act and the issue of termination ofthe services of the employees appointed on temporary basis [PART II- SEC. 3 (ii)] 416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

had come up for consideration before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in W.P. No. 1655 of 2002 (LIC of India Vs. Ravindra V. Ladhe and others ) and the Hon'ble Court upheld the termination and the workman is not entitled to any relief.

and second Respondents that sub - section (2c) of section 48 deals only with the question of retrospectively. Ex - facie a bare reading of the provision will demonstrate that the submission in not correct , sub- section (2c) specifically lays down that the provisions of clause ( cc ) of sub - section ( 2) of section 48 as well as any rules made under clause (cc) shall have effect inter alia notwithstanding anything contained in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In any case , the interpretation of the provisions is no longer res itegra but is covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Venugopal's case . The Industrial Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the workman had completed 240 days of service and that they were entitled to the protection given under section 25- F. The protection of section 25 - F is plainly unavailable once the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are overridden .

9. In the decision in writ petition no . 1655/2003 (Supra), the Hon'ble High Court has held that , "Respondent was appointed as part time sweeper and worked from 07-07-1988 till 04-07-1994 , when her services were terminated without notice or payment of compensation .

5. Parties have led oral evidence in support oftheir respective claims , besides placing reliance on documentary evidence . The workman , who examined himselfas a witness has reiterated the facts mentioned in the statement ofclaim in his examination- in - chief, which was on affidavit . However, in his cross - examination , he has admitted that he worked for one hour daily excluding holidays from 1991 to February 1993 and he was discontinued from service from 16-10-2000 and he has not filed any appointment letter or copy ofapplication submitted by him for his appointment . He has further admitted that management had engaged a regular sweeper on part time basis at Pusad branch and wages was paid to him deducting the payment for holidays and he was not allocated a permanent salary roll number and there was no deduction of provident fund from his salary and he did not appear in any interview or examination conducted by the department.

The CGIT held that she is retrenched and in violation of section 25 - F she should be reinstated . It was observed that she was appointed temporarily on part time basis and would be governed by regulation 8. The Staff Rules are rules within meaning of Section 48 ( 2 ) ( cc ) of LIC Act and have overriding effect over Industrial Disputes Act . Hence protection of Section 25 - F is not available . CGIT Award quashed".

6. One Shriram , a Manager (Personnel and Industrial relation) of LIC has been examined as a witness on behalf ofthe party no . 1. The evidence of the witness for the party no . I is in the same line as taken by party no . 1 in the written statement . It is necessary to mention here that the evidence of Shriram , which is on affidavit has remained unchallenged , as neither the workman nor his advocate appeared to cross - examine him .It is also necessary to mention here that as the workman remained absent from 16-12-2008 and did not take part in the case , the case proceeded ex - parte against him .

10. The principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Courts in the two decisions as mentioned above squarely apply to the present case at hand . It is clear from the evidence on record and the own documents of the workman that he was a casual part time temporary worker and he worked for one hour per day from 26-06-1991 to February 1992 and for two hours per day from March 1992 till he was discontinued on 14-06-2000 ( as per the statement of claim showing particulars of year wise / month wise attendance of the workman filed by himself as document no . 2) .

7. At the time of argument , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party no. 1 that as the workman was appointed temporarily on part time basis , his case is governed by Regulation 8 of the Regulations , having effects over the Act and as such , the protection of section 25 - F is not available to the workman and the workman is not entitled for any relief. In support of such contentions , the learned advocate for the workman placed reliance on the judgments ofHon'ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition no . 1655 of 2002 ( LIC Vs. Ravindra V. Ladhe and Others ) and in Writ Petition no . 1655 of 2003 ( LIC vs. S.G. Solanki & Another).

As the workman was appointed temporarily on part time basis , the provisions of regulation 8 of the Regulation are applicable to his case and sub- regulation ( 2 ) of regulation 8 contemplates that , " no person appointed under sub-regulation ( 1 ) shall only be reason or such appointment be entitled to absorption in the service of the corporation or claim preference for recruitment to any post " and as the Regulation have overriding effects over the Act , the protection of sections 25 - F and 25 -G of the Act are not available to the workman . Hence , the workman is not entitled to any relief. Therefore , it is ordered:

ORDER

The action of the management in relation to Pusad Branch ofLIC of India to terminate Shri Santosh Babulal Tak 8. The Hon'ble High Court in the decision in Writ Petition no. 1655 of2002 ( Supra) have held that , " The power to terminate the services of a temporary employee is implicit in the very nature of engagement under regulation 8 . Temporary engagement is necessarily temporary and can, therefore , be brought to an end by the employer in accordance with the governing provisions of contract and subject to any legal stipulation regulating his right . There is no merit in the submission urged on behalf of the first 417 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

: Absent

ForGuardwell Safe Services Pvt. Ltd.

: Absent

wetsweeper from service vide order no . Ref. 98- A/05 dated 10-06-2000 is legal and justified . The workman is not entitled for any relief.

ForCompetent Security and

Detective Services

J. P. CHAND , Presiding Officer

State : Maharashtra नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

Mumbai , dated the 5th day of October, 2011 . AWARD

2. Inexercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2 -A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 the Central Government has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

का.आ. 179.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जवाहरलाल नेहरू पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय-1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -1/ 1/ऑफ 2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-31011/5/1999- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी

Whether the action of the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust , Sheva, Mumbai in not absorbing 109 security guards and security supervisors as per list enclosed, on their permanent roll is legal and justified? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled?

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011

2. Learned counsel for the second party union has filed an application with the prayer that this Tribunal may dispose of the present reference for want of prosecution and the second party be given liberty to take appropriate steps at an appropriate time for redressal of its grievance .

3. Learned counsel for the first party has no objection ifthe reference is decided in terms of the application filed by the second party union .

S.O. 179. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT-1 / I of 2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court - 1 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

4. In view of the above application of the second party union it is clear that the second party union is not entitled to any relief in these proceedings .

[No. L-31011/5/1999 - IR (B - II) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

5. The matter stands disposed of as above and the second party union is given liberty to take appropriate steps at an appropriate time for redressal of its grievance.

AnAward is made accordingly.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , MUMBAI

JUSTICE G S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer

JUSTICE Q S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

Reference No. CGIT- I/l of 2000

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust

And Their Workmen

APPEARANCES:

का.आ. 180. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कामर्स के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 39/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

For the Management

: Shri Lancy D'Souza , Management Representative.

[सं. एल-12012/110/2007- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी Forthe Union

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011

: Shri Jai Prakash Sawant , Adv.

: Mr. Kapadia

ForSpeedy Transport Pvt . Ltd.

: Absent

For Central Warehousing Corporation

S.O. 180. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 39/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial 2GI /12-20 418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

20-9-2011 he also did not appear on behalf of the non- applicant therefore , case was reserved for passing award.

Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

[No. L- 12012/ 110/2007- IR(B -II) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

3. After filing claim statement the workman has not appeared to substantiate his claim by adducing any oral or documentary evidence . Except the claim statement there is no material on record on the basis of which the reference under consideration may be adjudicated on merits . It appears that the workman is not willing to contest the case further.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

PRESENT:

N.K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

4. Under these circumstances " No Claim Award " is passed in this matter. The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

I.D. 39/08

5. Award as above .

Reference No. L - 12012/ 110/2007 - IR( B - II )

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

dated: 1-2-2008

Sh.Mangal Chand Meena S/ o Sh . Rameshwar Lal Meena Ward No.20 , Near Bus Stand , Sardar Shahar, Churu ( Raj .)

V/ s

का.आ. 181.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय -2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-12-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था। The Deputy General Manager Oriental Bank of Commerce Sukhadia Circle, Sri Ganganagar.

[सं. एल -12012/281/1992- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी AWARD

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011

10-10-2011

1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause ( d) of Sub- section 1 & 2( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication which is as under :-

S.O. 181.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 12/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of UCO Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

[No. L- 12012/281 / 1992 - IR( B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD "Whether claimant Shri Mangal Chand Meena was in continuous employment in Oriental Bank of Commercefrom 14-6-2004 to 30-3-2007 as daily rated employee? If yes , his discontinuation from the work bythe bank management from 1-4-2007 was legal & justified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date? "

Present :

SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section ( 10 ) ( 1 ) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 12 of 1998

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Uco Bank , Patna and their workman . APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the Workman

: Mr. K. Chakravorty, Advocate

Onbehalf of the Employers : Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate 2. In pursuance of the reference order, registered notices were issued to both the parties . Upon perusal of the record it appears that Sh.B.S.Ratnu , Advocate appeared on behalf ofthe non - applicant on 23-4-2010 & Sh.T.M.Soni , Advocate appeared on 25-5-2010 on behalf of the workman & claim statement was filed on 7-9-2010 . At the stage of filing replyto the claim statement none appeared on behalf of the workman on 28-12-2010 , 10-3-2011 , 26-5-2011 , therefore, ex -party proceedings were drawn against him on 26-5-2011 . It also appears that representative on behalf of the non - applicant sought adjournment for filing reply on 14-7-2011 but on subsequent dates 1-9-2011 & [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State : Jharkhand

419

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

: Industry : Banking

Dhanbad, Dated the 18th October , 2011

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 had referred the dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad videMinistry's Order No. L- 12012/281 /92 dt . 4-12-92 which was registered there as Ref. No. 142/92. Consequent upon Ministry'sOrder No. L- 12012/281 /92- IR (B- II) dt . 5-2-1998 , the said Reference has been transferred to this Tribunal under Section 7 - A read with sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 33 -B ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 and the aforesaid Reference has been registered in this Tribunal as Ref. No. 12/98 for adjudication . The schedule of the reference is as under :-

"Whether the action ofthe management of UCO Bank in issuing Show cause notice for disengagement of ShriBipin Kumar Verma from daily wages engagement and in not absorbing the workman on regular basis is justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? " 2. The pleaded case of the sponsoring Union is that workman Bipin Kumar Verma has been working as a permanent workman against permanent vacancy in the UCO Bank sine 28-2-1989 continuously by putting in 240 days attendance in each calendar year . He was appointed and engagedby the Bank to perform thejob ofpermanent nature , for which the Bank has been paying the wages lesser than that of other workman . Despite the settled law of the land providing for the entitlement of all workman to equal wages for performing equal nature of job , the Bank, the Public Sector undertaking , is still exploiting the poor workman by not paying the equal pay for equal work . The existence of any exploitative terms as offered by the employer as easily accepted by the workman does not debar him from the claim for his legal wages and other benefits . As soon as the workman beganto demand for equal pay and regularisation the Management annoyedly and biasedly issued him a threatful letter as a show couse notice to disengage him for the reason mentioned therein . The workman replied to the show cause emphatically denying the charge . He had represented to the management about his already acquired permanent status . While the Management was contemplating the removal of the workman from his service on false and privolous show cause , the Union raised the industrial dispute before the Asstt . Labour Commissioner (Central ), Dhanbad . But the adamant anti - labour attitude of the management resulted in failure of the conciliation proceeding, hence the reference for adjudication . Thus the action of the Management in issuing show cause notice for disengagement of the workman from daily wage engagement and in not regularising him is unjustified.

3. Further it is pleaded in rejoinder in behalf of the workman that the reference is legally maintainable . The sponsoring Union is the major one of the establishment , and mostly workmen are its members . The Union always refused to enter into any settlement against the interest of the workman and contrary to the provision of law. Even an individual dispute is also legally maintainable under the 1.D. Act. The Union had represented before the management several times for regularisation of the concerned workman at par with other permanent employees . The alleged bipartite settlement was arrived at between the Management and its some pocket Union . It is not binding upon the workman , as it is illegal , invalid , arbitrary, and void abinitio . 240 days attendance in each calendar year is not required for regularisation .

4. Whereas , refuting the aforesaid allegations the case of the management is that the Provincial Bank Employee Association being unsupported by the workmen of the establishment has no locus standi to sponsor the case , as three Trade Unions-All India UCO Bank Employees Federation , the United Commercial Bank Employee Association and All India United Commercial Bank Staff Federation are functioning in the establisment of the Bank, and all the employees of UCO Bank working at different establishment are members of aforesaid concerned Union , but the workman is not a member of the sponsoring Union which is complete a stranger. The present reference is an individual not an industrial dispute . So it is liable to be summarily rejected . Workman Bipin Kumar Varma was firstly engaged on 28-2-1989 as a daily rated worker for performing certain miscellaneous jobs , then was subsequently engaged from time to time for jobs for miscellaneous nature in exigency. His irregular engagement in lack of sanction from the Competent Authority was all along invalid. He was not appointed nor selected by the Competent Authority according to recruitment procedure . Several persons initially engaged at different branches of the Bank in violation of the directions of the competent Authorities of the Bank were allowed to continue their employment for a number of years at the several demands of the aforesaid different trade Unions for their regularisations .

5. Further case of the Management is that as the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 12-10-1989 as arrived at between the Management and the concerned Trade Unions for empanelment and absorption of persons of daily wages the full days casual workers who had discharged their normal duties ofBank in subordinate cadre for 240 days or more in a year uninterruptedly during the period of 3 years immediately proceeding the aforesaid settlement and the persons engaged as Water Boy on daily wage would be considered for absorption . But the concerned workman engaged for the first time as on 28-2-1989 who did not complete 240 days attenance by 12-10-1989 was not eligible for his permanent absorption as per the circulardt . 19-10-1989 issued by the Management . After finalisation of all such cases of regularisation , most of the casual workers as well 420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

as the concerned workmen was issued the show cause notice dt . 16-1-1992 for disengagement from his services and he also submitted his reply to it . He was declared surplus to the requirement of the management . The Industrial Dispute as raised by the workman before the ALC ( C) , Dhanbad, resulted in its reference which is baseless . No person engaged as daily rated or casual worker bythe local officer of the Bank through back door method. should be regularised against the recruitment rules . The provisions of the Industrial Dispute (Central ) Rule 58 were complied with . The said settlement as the Circulardt . 19-10-1989 became binding upon the Unions concerned as well as upon all the workmen of all branches of the Bank on the roll at the relevant time or thereafter . The workman falling outside the settlement and the Circular has no right to regularisation in his service.

6. Specifically denying the allegations of the workman, the Management in its rejoinder had stated that the workman was engaged by unauthorised official not by the competentAuthority of the Bank, for temporary/ casual job , daily wages basis which was bein g paid to him . The Management strictly followed the principle of ' equal pay for equal work' though fixation of different grades for different categories of workmen as per their status and the Bank is paying the wages as per the various settlement and award applicable to the Banking services . So the workman is not entitled to any relief.

Finding with reasoning

7. In this case , WW- 1 Bipin Kumar Verma , the workman himself in behalf of the sposoring Union , MW- 1 Harihar Prasad Sahu , the Senior Manager, and MW-2 B.B. Hazra, the Manager, both of UCO Bank , Hirapur Branch , in behalf of the Management have been examined .

On the close study of the statement of WW- 1 Bipin Kumar Verma , the workman himself I find his admitted facts. are as under :-

(i) He had been paid his wages on weekly basis against vouchers (Ext.2 four photocopies of the vouchers ) while other Peons were paid by monthly bill;

( ii) He was served with a show cause notice on 16-1-92 for disengagement to which he replied and on receipt of the show cause notice, they initiated a proceeding before the ALC ( C ) , Dhanbad; thereafter there was a reference to the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad (which was transferred to this Tribunal No. 2 as per the Ministry's Order dt . 5-2-1998 as noted above) ;

(iii) There was no other daily rated workman save and except himself and

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (iv) There was no advertisement for appointment of any Peon in the Bank prior to his appointment .

8. Expressing his ignorance of the procedure for appointment in the Bank , creation of any Selection Committee for selecting the candidates for appointment in the Bank , any settlementdt . 12-10-89 between the Management and the Union of the employees for regularisation , and any circulardt . 19-10-89 the workman (WW- 1 ) claims (in his depositiondt . 26th May, 1998 ) to havebeenserving the UCO Bank since 28th February, 1989 till that date by performing 250 to 260 days ( as contrasted with his pleaded facts of 240 days ) in a calendar year the duty identical to that of a permanent Peon . He was paid weekly through vouchers . He has proved only the signature ofSri B.B. Hazra of UCO Bank as Ext. W-2 on his purported work certificatedt. 06-07-92 Marked ' X ' for identification .

Whereas MW- 1 Harihar Prased Sahu , the Senior Manager posted at Hirapur Branch of UCO Bank from 1988 to Feb. , 1992, has admitted to have unauthorisedly engaged theworkman Bipin Kumar Verma as a casual worker w.e.f. 28-2-89 to serve water etc. ( miscellaneous work) though the Senior Managers have no authority to appoint any casual worker for Cadre posts of Class III or IV. He ( MW- 1 ) has proved the Note Sheet (A typed Certificate under sd/- Senior Manager ) as Ext . W- 1 , and submitted it to the Higher Authority. According to him ( MW- 1 ), the day- to-day working of Class IV employee not having been reduced to writing, any such memo about their work is sent after watching their work done . I find it clearly relates to the permanent Class IV staff, not the casual worker.

9. MW- 2 B. B. Hazra ( Binod Bihari Hazra) , the Manager of the UCO Bank , Hirapur Branch form January , 1992to December, 1993 , has stated the workman concerned was working as a casual worker in the Branch during the period who used to carry water etc. According to him (MW- 2), as per the Circulardt . 19-10-89 issued by the Head Office , Calcutta Marked Ext . M - 1 , any workman working against regular post was to be regularised . The workman was paid through the four vouchers marked as Ext . M - 2 to M -2/ 3 series . But his demand for regularisation in Class IV post is unjustified in view of the circular. According to this witness, there is no provision for appointment of casual worker in the Bank . The Bank vouchers show the workman was working as Helper , and not on permanent post of Class IV. Affirming his alleged signature on the document marked 'X' not his own the witness has stated that the Attendance ofthe workman was not marked on the Attendance Sheet ofthe Bank, rather it is verifiable only from the vouchers . The Branch has no appointment letter. The originals of Ext . M -2series (photo copies of vouchers ) can be produced by the Bank .

10. Mr. D. Mukherjee , Advocate for the Union concerned , submits that none of the two witnesses of the Management has proved either the workman's appointment [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

irregular for want of sanction of the Competent Authority or the fact of surplus as per the Written Statement , but the workman has been working for the last 22 years since 28-2-1989 till date by putting his more than 240 days attendance in each year, and he was not surplus to the requirement , and as such " The pleading is no substitute for proof, unless oral evidence adduced to prove the same" as held in the case of Manager , R.B.I. , Banglore -Vrs - S . Mani & 2 others , 2005 ( 105 ) FLR ( SC ) at page 1067 . Mr. Mukherjee , the Ld. Advocate for the Union tried to convince with the word " Industrial Dispute " as defined in Sec . 2(k) of the I.D. Act , 1947 and meaning ' Term of Employment includes Employee- employer in acting capacity in a grade and question of their confirmation amountsto raising of industrial dispute which Tribunal can decide of (AIR 1984 ( SC) 1683 workmen - vrs - Hindustan Lever Ltd. He has also argued that the object of security of tenure , essential for an employee , can be attained by regularisation within a reasonable period - Labour Laws being beneficial piece of legislation , benefits must go to the Labour (2006 (2 ) JLJR ( SC ) 80 , workmen of Bhurkunda Colliery- Vrs - Mgt. of Bhurkunda Colliery - Paras - 6, 7, 9, & 11 ) . But the ruling also ordains effort must be to regularise the work charged employees and casual labour as early as possible , subject qualifications , and availability ofwork (para- 12) .

11. Lastly, the contention of Mr. Mukherjee , the Senior Counselfor the Union in reference to the authority (2009 ) 2 SCC ( L & S ) 513 ( DB ) ( A ) Maharashtra SRTC.V. Casteribe Rajya Parivahan Karmchari Sangathana related to Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act , 1971 ( 1 of 1972 ) ( MRTU) Act- Ss.3d ( 1 ) ( b ), 32 and Sch IV, Item 6 , is that Industrial Labour Courts enjoy vide power under S.3d ( 1 ) ( b ) of the Act which includes the power to accord permanency to employee affected by unfair labour practice- This power remaining intact is unaffectedby Umadevi ( 3 ) case for two reasons - first, this Act was not at all considered by the Constitution Bench , and second the Umadevi case limits scope of powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts under Art 32 and 226 respectively to issue directions for regularisation in matter of public employment ( para 30- 32,47 & 48), But such fact of unfair Labour practice in lack of such proof stans unproved. So this ruling appears to be inapplicable to this Case .

12. Whereas Mr. D. K. Verma , the Learned Advocate for the Management, submits that " Appointment were not made as per Adhiniyam , granting relief of re - instatement would not be proper, but corporation was directed to pay compensation as held in the case of Nagar Mahapalika V. state of U.P. , 2006 LAB . I.C. 2264 ( DB ) -(A). This authority also appears not to hold good with the case , as in the case , the workman was indisputably casually engaged on daily wages for one day in the years 1989 , 1990 , 1992 and six days in the year 1994 ( four Xerox Vouchers Extt . M - 2 /2

421

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/ पौष 24 , 1933

M-2/ 1 , 2 & 2/3 repectively) . Besides that the photo copies of the notesheet (under sd/- Senior Manager- Ext. W- 1), unauthorisely issued by MW- 1 Harihar Pd . Sahu the Senior Manager to the workman can never confer on him any right to entitlement of regularisation as a peon . And the plea of his ignorance of the procedure for appointment in the Bank is unacceptable . There is no proof of the workman working for 240 days in any calendar year.

13. On the over all consideration of the proceeding discussed facts and law, I find that the workman has failed to prove his claim thus it is held that the action of the management of UCO Bank in issuing show cause notice for disengagement , and in not absorbing the workman on regular basis is quite justified in eye of facts and law. Therefore , the workman , Bipin Kumar Verma is held nou at all entitled to any relief.

KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

का. आ.182.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निः॥ जकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, श्रम न्यायालय । , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -1 /21 ऑफ 2004) कां प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/220/2003 आईआर ( बी- II )} शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011 S.O. 182.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT- 1 / 21 of2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court - 1 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

[No. -12012/220 /2003 - IR( B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 MUMBAI JUSTICEGS SARRAF, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT- 1/21 of 2004 Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank And Their Workmen ( Bhaskar M. Bendra ) 422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

APPEARANCES :

: Shri .Alva , Adv. For the Management

For the workman

: Shri J. P. Sawant, Adv .

State

: Maharashtra Mumbai , dated the 14th day of October ; 2011 .

AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Government in e.. ercise of its powers under clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :

Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in dismissing the services of Mr. Bhaskar M.Bendrew.ef. 4-7-2000 is legal and justuied ? Ifnot , what relief the workman is entitled to?

2 On 17-3-2011 learned counsel for the second party workman informed that the workman had expired . The matter was adjourned for 20-4-2011 for taking appropriate action by learned counsel for the workman . On 20-4-2011 learned counsel for the workman prayed for adjournment . On the 1: ext date 20-6-2011 learned counsel for the workman again prayed for adjournment . On the next date 14-7-2011 none appeared for the workman . On the next date 18-8-2011 learned counsel for the workman again prayed for time for taking appropriate steps in the matter. Even today, no application has been filed for taking legal representatives of the deceased workman on record ,

3. In view of the above these proceedings have abated.

4. Reference is answered as above .

5. An award is passed accordingly. JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 33. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 119/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/45/2003- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011

S.O. 183. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No.119/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] management of Union Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

[No. L- 12012/45/2003 - IR(B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 15th November, 2011

Present : A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 119/2003

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause(d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 14 of 1947 , between the Management of the Union Bank of India and their workman)

Between

1st Part/Petitioner

Smt. T. Parvathy And

2nd Party /Respondent Union Bank of India

The Senior Manager ( P) : Regional Office 139, Broadway

Chennai -600 108

APPEARANCES

For the i st Party/Petitioner : M/ s . K.M. Ramesh , Advocates

For the 2nd Party/Management : M/ s. T. S. Gopalan & Co. , Advocates

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 12012/ 45/2003 - IR ( B - II ) dated 13-06-2003/ 18-07-2003 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in terminating the services of Smt . T. Parvathy with effect from 29-1-2002 is legal and justified? If not, what relied is she entitled to ? " 2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute this Tribunal hasnumbered it as ID 119/2003 and issued notice to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their claim, counter and rejoinder as the case may be .

3. The Claim Statement contentions briefly read as follows:

423 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

The Petitioner joined the services of 2nd Party/ Management in its Besant Nagar branch on 30-10-1998 as Casual sub - staff on daily wages and II Party/Management instead of regularising her services illegally and unjustifiably terminated her from service on 29-1-2002 . Even to the Petitioner's representations and notices there was no response . Though the Petitioner had worked continuously without any break for more than three years the Respondent/Management has not regularised her service and they have terminated her service which is totally arbitrary, illegal and unjustified . The Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in each calendar year especially preceding one calendar year prior to her illegal termination. The Respondent has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25F, 25G and 25H of the industrial Disputes Act and the persons who ha e joined service as Casual Labourers subsequent to the Petitioner have been regularised in service and they are still in service . The action of the Respondent is also in violation of circular issuedby Central Office ofthe Respondent/ Bank. Hence , the Petitioner prays that an award may be passed to reinstate the Petitioner in service with continuity of service , back wages and all other attendant benefits .

Nagar branch . The Petitioner was lastly engaged in November , 2001. Her engagement was neither regular nor continuous but it is only an ad - hoc arrangement till regular part-time sweeper was posted . She was only attending to the cleaning ofpremises . Therefore , irregular engagement of the Petitioner was done by the local Manager on his own volition and the same could not create a right in her favour to claim employment . The Petitioner was not working continuously. She was engaged to attend to cleaning work which was hardly for an hour or two . The Petitioner was not sponsored by Employinent Exchange and she could not be considered for regularisation in the services of Respondent/Bank. Merely, by reason of fact that she was engaged for some days by the Besant Nagar branch between 1998 and 2001 she could not be said to have been employed in the services of the Respondent/Bank . Further, her non- engagement could not amount to termination much less retrenchment within the meaning of Section 2 (00 ) of the Act . There are only 30 vouchers evidencing the payment of wages to Petitioner between 19-12-98 and 30-11-2001 which clearly shows the factual position about the days of her engagement . Now the Respondent/Bank is saddled with excess manpower and in the year 2001 it had put up a VRS, pursuant to which number of employees in all categories left their service and those vacancies are not filled up . Therefore , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim of the Petitioner may be dismissed with costs .

5.Again , the Petitioner in the rejoinder stated that it is not true and correct to say that the II Party/ Management was appointing persons only against sanctioned posts . In reality the persons like the Petitioner are engaged for doing sweeping and scavenging work in almost all branches of the Respondent/Bank. It is also now well settled that for menial jobs, the question of sponsoringby Employment Exchange does not arise . It is false to allege that the Petitioner was engaged in Besant Nagar branch only on the days the regular part-time sweeper ofAdyar Branch was not available . On the other hand, the Petitioner was engaged continuously without any break whatsoever. It is also not true to say that the Petitioner was not engaged after November , 2001. The Petitionerwas terminated only on 29-1-2002 and till such time, she was engaged regularly. The Petitioner was working in the branch right from morning to close of banking hours . The Petitioner has worked between 30-10-98 to 29-1-02 on all working days . Hence, the Petitioner prays an award may be passed in her favour.

4. As against this , the Respondent in its Counter Statement contended that the Respondent/Bank has fixed number of posts on each category for each branch and the appointments are made only after the sanctioned posts . The Respondent/ Bank being a public sector undertaking . no one can gain entry into service of the bank by back door or influence or collusion or by taking advantage of any omission or failure on the part of its officers . Further , the Sub - Staff category was filled up by the Respondent/ Bank from among the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange .It is not uncommon in the Respondent/Bank that on occasions like opening of a new branch , without the knowledge or authority of Regional Office: the concerned Branch Manager have engaged local person to attend the cleaning work and wages paid to them is debited to general expenditure account. Such engagement is neither permitted or authorised and it will not be binding on the bank . On 30-10-1998 when the Respondent/ Bank opened a branch at Besant Nagar, it has deployed the part time sweeper attached to Adyar branch to Besant Nagar branch. When the part -time sweeper of Adyar branch was not available , the branch may have engaged the Petitioner for cleaning the premises . On 4-9-99 one Mrs. Sumathi , part -time sweeper attached to Adyar branch was posted to Besant Nagar branch . Though , it is a part of duties of regular part-time sweepers to clean the toilet , there is practice in some of the branches that they decline to attend the work of cleaning the toilet and local person is engaged for cleaning the toilet . On 4-3-2000 One Mr. Selvaraj , Daftry, Madras Main branch was posted as sub - staff to Besant

6.My learned predecessor by award dated 19-12-2005 directed the Respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all benefits including half of the back wages . For passing the award the petitioner had been examined as WW1 and Management Witness , Sri R. Prabhakar has been examined as MW1 . On the petitioner's side Ex.W1 ( Series) to Ex . W 12 and onthe Respondent's side Ex.M1 to Ex.M3 were marked.

424

[PART II--SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/ PAUSA 24, 1933

7. On filing Writ Petition No. 1 0727 of 2006 by the Management challenging the award the Hon'ble High Court ofMadras by order dated 26-04-2011 set aside the impugned award and remitted back the matter for fresh finding in the following terms:

" In such circumstances , without going into the other issues raised before this Court, the award of the Ist Respondent Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court made in ID No. 119/2003 , is set aside , only in so far as it relates to the findings given by 1st Respondent relating to the non - production of the relevant records by the Petitioner Bank and the consequent adverse inference drawn by the Ist Respondent , with regard to the number of days worked by the 2nd Respondent Employee, and the matter is remitted back to the 1st Respondent to cause an enquiry and to give its findings by giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, as well to the 2nd Respondent , on merits and in accordance with the law, within a period of 4 months from the date ofreceipt of copy ofthis order" .

8. After remand petitioner was further recalled and examined in chief by way of Proof Affidavit and cross- examined in continuation of her testimony before remand , with no further documents proved on her side i.e. Ex . W1 to Ex .W12 . On the Respondent's side over and above MWI examined before remand MW2 Sri S. Ravikumar was examinedby way of Proof Affidavit in lieu of Chief Examination and cross - examined and Ex.M4 to EX.M6 (series) marked over and above Ex.Ml to Ex.M3 marked before remand .

9. In these circumstances , the points for my consideration are :

(i ) Whether the action of the Respondent/Bank in terminating the services of the Petitioner with effect from 29-01-2002 is legal and justified?

(ii) To what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

without the same vouchers for the different and entire spells of period having been produced . The Management has had no case that the documents called for were not available and that they cannot be produced . The contention was that they were voluminous and can be made available for inspection . But in the inspection held all of them were not produced as is evident from the minutes of inspection marked as Ex. W 10. Consequentto the petitioner's filing of another petition for production of documents Respondent filed a memo dated 25-08-2011 admitting that the petitioner might have worked for 240 days . The order of the High Courtremanding the matter for a fresh finding on the ground that the impugned award is misconceived on the basis of an adverse inference wrongly drawn as though no document is produced whereas some documents had actually been produced. Now the fact of petitioner having worked for not less than 240 days is conceded . During the time of petitioner's employment there was no practice of any notification by the Employment Exchange . Muster Rolls contain only names of regular staff and other casuals . Petitioner is proved to remain unemployed following the illegal termination . For the post of Sweeper the requirement of compulsory notification of vacancies through the Employment Exchange or sponsoring through it is not called for. Petitoner's answer to a leading question without any factual foundation in the counter tending to show that she clings only to be posted as Attender is not to be allowed to negate he claim for reinstatement to the post from which she was terminated for which she has expressed her readiness in the box to work in any capacity. Evidently , there is no other Part - Time Sweeper in the branch . There is no case or evidence that the petitioner is a late comer and which is not a practice ofher also . Though reinstatement is not to be automatic in a case of violation of Section - 25F compensation is also not to be a rule instead of frequent reinstatement invariably in appropriate cases Contra arguments on behalf of the Respondent are that while by her testimony in the box she wants to be posted as Attender. She can go back only to the previous post . She also wants to be made a permanent employee . Reinstatement cannot be a rule and compensation can be given in a proper case .

10. The evidence consists of the testimony of WWI and Ex. W1 to Ex . W12 on the petitioner's side and the testimony ofMWI and MW2 and Ex .M1 to Ex.M6 ( Series) on the Respondent's side .

Points ( i ) & ( ii)

12. Reliance was placed on a series of decisions placed by both sides. In the unreported decision of the High Court ofMadras dated 14-3-2011 in :

SYNDICATE BANK , REGIONAL OFFICE VS. PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL , LABOUR COURTAND THE GENERAL SECRETARY SYNDICATE BANK EMPLOYEES UNION IN WP NO . 3678 OF 2005 wherein it is stated " A mere reading of the above said judgment clears that as per Section- 3 of the Act , any employment to do unskilled office work has been exempted from the purview of the said Act . Therefore , the said Amudha , who was 11. Heard both sides . Perused the records , documents and the evidence . The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly argued that petitioner as a casual Sub- Staff was doing sweeping and scavenging work in 1998 , 1999, 2000 and 2001 until terminated on 29-02-2002 without complying with the conditions of Section - 25F of the ID Act. Though as per order on IA 47/2004 for production of documents the same was allowed, only Ex.W11 and EX.W 12 were produced which are statements showing the number of days worked by the petitioner and lumpsum payment ofwages paid to her which are based on vouchers भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

appointed as a part - time sweeper , cannot be even termed to be irregular appointment . Secondly, as per the ratio laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in School Committee's case (supra) , an Office Helper need not come through the Employment Exchange , hence , the said Amudha's appointment cannot be considered to be in violation ofthe 1959 Act ' .

BASKAR. R. AND OTHERS VS. AUTOCARE CENTRE, CHENNAI AND ANOTHER (2003 - I-LLJ- 700) High Court of Madras held that " The Labour Court has rightly rejected the claim ofthe petitioners asthey were not interested to join as Casual Labour as reinstatement can be done only to the post last held" , a decision relied on behalf ofthe Respondent .

JAGBIR SINGH VS. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD AND ANOTHER (2009 - IV- LLJ - 336)( SC) it was held that "In case of finding of illegal termination of employee'sservice grant of relief of reinstatement with back wages , not automatic . Instead compensation may be granted ."

425

entry made at the whims & fancy of an incompetent authority or with some monetary benefit gained by him. Every engagement as in the instant case cannot be termed as a backdoor entry . There are such instances as in this casewarranting such engagement in certain circumstances as held in the decision ofthe Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case. The eligibility to regularization of such menials as in this case cannot be deprived because it amounts to unfair labour practice . Decision in Uma Devi's case has no application where there is unfair labour practice meted out on a workman as envisaged under Section- 30 of the ID Act, 1947

14.Respondent having admitted in writing and filed a memo to the effect that petitioner might have worked not less than 240 days the said question is not to be looked into any further. It is pertinent to note that in the matter of appreciation of facts sought to be proved allowances have to be given by Courts to marginal discrepancies in the versions of the witnesses . Petitioner's version is to be so understood. Now the question is whether her termination from service is legal and justified. There is no whisper regarding the manner in which petitioner's cessation of service was brought about . Evidently it is clear that she has not been issued notice , not given notice pay or compensation as provided under Section - 25F of the ID Act. Therefore , there is violation of Section - 25F of the ID Act rendering the action illegal and unjust . The petitioner istherefore entitled to be reinstated into service forthwith with continuity of service and all attendant benefits including 75% back wages . Thereafter whether she is to be regularized or not is to be examined and appropriately decided by the Management in accordance with the norms and rules governing regularization and in vogue and as per the relevant recruitment procedures under the Management . The petitioner is therefore entitled to the above relief.

15. The reference is answered accordingly. (Dictated to the PA transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 15th November, 2011 ) .

A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

For the 1st Party/Petitioner

WWI , Smt. T. Parvathy MWI , Sri R. Prabhakar MW2 , Sri S. Ravikumar

For the 2nd Party/Management

Documents Marked:

On the petitioner's side

Date

Description

EX.No. EX.W1

Xerox copies of payment vouchers for payment of Wages ( Series ) to 1st Party/ Petitioner ( 15 voucher )

EX.W2 16-2-2002 Copy of letter from Ist Party / Petitioner to 2nd Party /Respondent

EX.W3 16-4-2002 Copy of legal notice issued by the Ist Party/ Petitioner to 2nd Party/Respon- dent

EX.W4 19-4-2002 Copy of legal notice issuedby the Ist Party/Petitioner Respondent to 2nd Party/

EX.W5 24-6-2002

13. Inview ofmy above discussion the rulings relied onbehalf ofthe Respondent cannot be said to be squarely applicable to the case whereas those relied on behalf ofthe petitioner are of apt bearing on the facts . That is to say though the petitioner made a stray version that she wanted apermanent job and as an Attender in the wake of a leading question, not with sound factual foundation in the Counter Statement of the Respondent, she has made it clear that she is prepared to accept employment on reinstatement in any capacity. In the case of menials Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies ) Act , 1949 is not applicable . There is no evidence the petitioner happened to be engaged by any incompetent authority except an ipsedixit of the management. It is in evidence that the petitioner happened to be engaged in Besant Nagar Branch due to more than one reason , viz . there was reluctance from the part of regular Sweepers to clean toilets in some branch which necessitated engagement of Sweeper like petitioner to be engaged alternatively to do the above said specific item of work. Again though there was a regular PTS posted with higher scale of pay the incumbent having had not joined duty the petitioner is understood to have been engaged to compensate the absentee menial to do the work. In such circumstances , the engagement if and whenmade by the officials of the branch to tide over the difficulties cannot be said to be unauthorized or incompetent, while in such a manner the petitioner as has been admitted continued to work and completed not less thạn 240 days of continuous duty within 12 calendar months , visiting her with cessation ofemployment violating the conditions of Section -25F of the ID Act is totally unjust and illegal. Her appointment cannot be termed as a backdoor entry in the absence of proof to show that it was a backdoor 2GI /12-21

Copy of petition filed by the 1st party/ Petitioner raising Industrial Dispute 426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 / PAUSA 24 , 1933

EX.W6 28-10-2002 Copy of reply filed by the 1st Party/ Petitioner before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour ( Central ) EX.W7 21-10-2002 Xerox copy of the letter from 2nd Party/ Management to Assistant Commissioner of Labour( Central ) EX . W8 22-2-2004 Xerox copy of the letter from Respondent advocate to Respondent/ Management

EX.W9

13-9-2004 Xerox copy of the minutes of inspection carried out by Ist party's advocate at Besant Nagar Branch

EX.W10 23-4-2005 Xerox copy of the minutes of inspection carried out by 1st Party's advocate AT Besant Nagar Branch

EX.W11 Nil

Statement showing number of days worked by petitioner in Respondent / Bank

FX W12 Nil Statement showing lumpsum payment of wages paid to petitioner Besant Nagar Branch

On the Management's side

EX . No. Date

Description

EX. MI

Besant Nagar Branch Cash Payment details from 6-11-1998 to 13-11-2001 EX . M2 4-9-1999 Memorandum of J. Sumathi ( Xerox copy of the order of transfer issued to Smt. Sumathi )

EX . M3 4-3-2000 Memorandum of M. Selvaraj ( Xerox copy of the order of transfer issued to Sri Selvaraj )

EX M4

List of Part- Time Sweepers/ Keepers recruited between 2005 and 2007 and in response to paper advertisement in 6/2008 in Daily Thanthi between 2008 and 2010

EX . M5 11-6-2008 Paper advertisement in Daily Thanthi for Part- Time Sweepers

Ex. M6 6-5-1999 . To Muster Roll enclosing attendance sheets of Besant Nagar Branch 30-9-2001

नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 184.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार युनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बौच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12011/84/2006- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011

S.O. 184. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 74/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] management of Union Bank of India and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 21-11- 2011 .

[No. L - 12011/ 84/2006- IR(B - II) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT Industrial Dispute No. 74/06 Between

TheGeneral Secretary,

Union Bank Employees Union , 628-M -33 , Murari Nagar, Faizabad Road , Lucknow And

The Deputy General Manager , Union Bank of India, NRO , Sharda Tower , Kapoorthala Complex , Aliganj , Lucknow. AWARD

1. Central Government , Mol , New Delhi , vide notification no . L- 12011 /84/ 2006 - IR ( B - II ) dated 14-11-06 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal .

2. Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India, Banaras in withholding the special allowance and Censure imposed on Sri O. P. Shrama . Head Clerk 'E' vide punishment order dated No. ROV/ DP/ 1893 dated 28-4-03 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?

3. Brief facts are workman was [posted as permanent head cashier at Aurangabad Branch Varanası during year 2001 , when a fraud of Rs . 80,000 took place in saving bank account no . 6585 through a loose cheque no ... on 24-9-01 . The cheque was scroll posted, passed by two officers and then paid by the workman to the bearer of taken . Later on it was found that this was a fraud . The management charge sheeted the workman vide charge sheet no . so and so dated 8-5-02 . The departmental inquiry was conducted and final punishment order dated 28-4-03 as under was passed .

4. Punishment of permanent withdrawal of special allowances of head cashier for the major misconduct and censure for the minor misconduct be and is hereby imposed upon Sri Om Prakash Sharma.

427

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

bound to be answered against the claimant and in favour of the opposite party.

RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

5. It is alleged that the finding of enquiry officer being unfair, totally perverse , the punishment imposed was illegal and unjustified. The workman had submitted an appeal also; the appellate authority without applying hismind also rejected appeal . Thereafter he raised dispute consequent upon the present reference has been made by the appropriate government.

6. It is also alleged that the inquiry officer was not partial. Therefore , he has prayed that the order be declared as illegal and the punishment awarded be set aside .

का. आ. 185.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महाराष्ट्र बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय-2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट पार्ट- II , ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/ 83 ऑफ 2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/85/2000- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2011

S.O. 185.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Part - II (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/83 of 2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court - 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

[No. L- 12012/ 85/2000 - IR(B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer 7. Opposite party has filed the written statement . It is admitted that the claimant was posted as a cashier but it is alleged that during his tenure as a cashier a fraud of Rs . 80000 was deducted for which a show cause notice was issued to the claimant . Thereafter after seeking explanation , charge sheet was served to the claimant alleging gross misconduct and minor misconduct. A thorough inquiry was conducted and during inquiry it was found by the enquiry officer that the prescribed procedure was not followed by the cashier and the workman acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the bank while performing his duties due to which the bank suffered a heavy monetary loss . He was not at all vigilant . Enquiry Officer has found that Sri Sharma was responsible and guilty of contributory and gross negligence . He was afforded fullopportunity of his defence therefore , no violation ofprinciple of natural justice. The punishment imposed is also in proportion to the proved misconduct against the workman to meet the end ofjustice . The action of the management is fully legal and justified in imposing the punishment . Appeal was also dismissed by the appellate authority by a reasoned order.

ANNEXURE

8. In the rejoinder the claimant has denied the averments ofthe reply of the opposite party and has prayed that the same be rejected the claim petition be allowed .

9. Perused the record thoroughly.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI PRESENT Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ : Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT-2 /83 of 2000 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE 10. After giving several opportunities to the claimant to adduce evidence , in support of his pleadings , he failed to adduce any evidence . Opposite party has also not adduced any evidence .

MANAGEMENT OF BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

The General Manager (Personnel )

11. Initially the burden lies on the claimant to prove his case. Pleadings cannot take the shape of proof unless admitted.

12. It has been held by the Hon'ble High Court in a number of cases that where workınan is neither appearing nor producing evidence before labour court - Labour Court had no jurisdiction to hold order illegal .

13. Therefore , in this the workman has miserably failed to prove the malafide of the opposite party in awarding punishment by leading cogent and reliable evidence . Therefore , it is concluded that the claimant has failed to prove his case .

Bank ofMaharashtra, Central Office 1501, Lokmangal , Shivaji Nagar, Pune-411005 (MS) AND THEIR WORKMEN Shri M. S. Awasthi Main Road , Navapad AtPost Tal . Jawhar Distt. Thane-401 603.

14. In view of above discussion , it is held that the claimant is not entitled to claim any relief. Reference is therefore , 428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] APPEARANCES :

FortheEmployer

:

Mr. V. M. Parkar , Advocate

For the Workmen

: In person

Mumbai , dated the 24th October , 2011

AWARD PART- II

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment by its Order No. L- 12012/ 85 /2000 - IR (B - II) , dated 22-8-2000 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Maharashtra by dismissing Shri M.S. Awasthi from the services of Bank is justified and proper ? If not, then, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

workman. They are for appointment of part - time clerk and about sanctioning of loans without authority, not following the procedure prescribed for sanction of some ofthe loans. In this respect fact is not disputed that there are no charges like that of misappropriation, bribery or any underhand dealing etc. Though these charges are proved and the second party workman is held guilty for themisconduct under clause 19.5(j ) ofBipartite Settlement, the charges are not serious enough to dismiss the second party workman . Furthermore , I would like to point out that the loan amount sanctioned by him are maximum up to Rs . 50,000 . As per the second charge he has sanctioned loan of Rs . 25,000 . As per the third charge he had sanctioned loan of Rs . 15,000 . As per fourth charge he had sanctioned loan of Rs . 3,000 against FDR of Rs. 50,000 . As per fifth charge he had sanctioned loan of Rs .40,000 to purchase a motorcycle and the amount was more than the price of the motorcycle . As per charge No. six, he had sanctioned agricultural loan of Rs . 50,000 without mortgage of land . As per charge no . 7 , he had sanctioned an amount of Rs . 20,000 . As per charge no . 8 and 9 he had not followed the procedure laid down for sanction of the above loans .

4. In this respect , judicial notice of the fact can be taken of that in some cases due to certain difficulties , the documents such as mortgage , lease or deed of hypothecation etc. are prepared subsequently. Though it isirregularity, it is not a serious misconduct as such . Furthermore, though he has not followed procedure there are no charges of any corrupt practice, misappropriation or undue favour in sanctioning the loans . He may be under wrong impression of having power to sanction loan as an officiating Branch Manager. In the circumstances , though these transactions of sanctioning loans amount to misconduct , they cannot be said to be serious enough to dismiss the employee from the service.

2. In Part- I Award dated 18-11-2008 passedby this tribunal it was held that , the inquiry against the second partyworkman conducted by the Enquiry Officer was fair and proper . The charges levelled against the second party workman were, while he was officiating Branch Manager of Vikramgad Branch without authority he had appointed part- time clerks . He had sanctioned housing loan of Rs . 25,000 to Shri Mangesh Raoji Bhurkud , sub - staff and had sanctioned consumer loan of Rs.15,000 to Shri S. G. Pendem for purchase of colour TV. and also sanctioned loans to some others . As all these were without authority he was charge sheeted for the same . The Enquiry Officer conducted the inquiry and held the second party workman guilty of misconduct for appointing a part - time clerk and sanctioning loans without authority. The Enquiry Officer had submitted his report with recommendation of termination of the services of the second party workman . The management after hearing the workman terminated his services . The second party workman raised industrial dispute. In the first part Award , my Ld . Predecessor held that the inquiry was fair and proper . He also held that the findings of Enquiry Officer are not perverse . In this second part award I am dealing with the remaining issues framed by my Ld . Predecessor. They are , as follows:

Issues

Findings

No.

(3) Whether action of management ofBank of Maharashtra dismissing Mr. S.B. Awasthi from the services ofBank is iustified and proper ?

(4) What reliefthe workman is

As per final order.

entitled to

REASONS

Issue No. 3

3. Inthis respect I would like to point out that there are as many as nine charges against the second party

5. Furthermore , as per charge no . 1 he has appointed two part-time clerks unauthorisedly vide his order dated 27- 4-1993 and 28-6-1993 respectively. In this respect I would like to point out that the period of the part time employees worked is not mentioned in the charge sheet. In this respect Iwould also like to point out that though the act of appointing part-time clerks amount to misconduct for want of authority, such part-time clerks or peons are engaged by the Branch Managers for temporary period to clear up the pending work . There are also no allegations or charges of any malpractice or acceptance of bribe etc. in appointing the two part -time clerks . The misconduct is that he had appointed them with out authority. In the circumstances , this misconduct also cannot be called serious enough to dismiss him from the services . There are no allegations of any underhand dealing , corruption or misappropriation . In the circumstances , though the party no. 2 is found guilty of misconduct under clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement, I hold that the punishment awarded by the management is disproportionate to the 429

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust

And

TheirWorkmen

Appearances:

For the Management

: Shri Lanchy D'Souza , ¡Management- Re-presentative

For the Union

: Shri Jai Prakash Sawant , Adv.

ForSpeedy Transport Pvt. Ltd.: Mr.Kapadia

: Absent

misconduct proved against him. Instead of dismissing him from service to meet the end ofjustice, I think it proper to award him punishment of compulsory retirement with all pensionary benefits . Thus , I hold that the punishment awarded by the management is not justified and proper. Instead of dismissal from service he should be retired compulsorilywith pensionary benefits . Accordingly, I decide this point no. 3 in the negative and hold that the workman should be retired compulsorily with all pensionary benefits . Accordingly, I decide this issue no. 4 that the workman is entitled to the reliefofsubstitution of punishment ofdismissal bycompulsory retirement with pensionary benefits . Thus , I pass the following order :

For Central Warehousing

ORDER

Corporation

Absent

ForOrnate Multi-Model

Carriers Pvt.Ltd .

Thepunishinent of dismissal from service is set aside . Instead ofdismissal, the second party workman be retired compulsorily with all pensionary benefits.

: Maharashtra

State

Date: 24th October , 2011

Κ. Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ , Presiding Officer

Mumbai , dated the 5th day of October, 2011 . AWARD

नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2 - A ) of Section 10 of theIndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 the Central Government has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

का. आ. 186. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जवाहरलाल नेहरू पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय-1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -1/6 ऑफ 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-31011 / 5/2003- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 22nd December, 2011

Whether any empleyer - empioyee relationship exists between the workmen employed for Container Freight Station operations in the Container Freight Station of Jawaharial Nehru Port Trust through the intermediaries including the Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC ) and M/ s Ornate Multi- Model Carriers Pvt . Ltd. , Mumbai ? Whether the demand for absorption of workmen employed for Container FreightStation operations in direct services of JNPT isjustified? If not , what relief are the workmen concerned entitled to?

2. Learned counsel for the Second party union has filed an application with the prayer that this Tribunal may dispose of the present reference for want of prosecution and the second party be given liberty to take appropriate steps at an appropriate time for redressal of its grievance .

S.O. 186.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 1 / 6of2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court- 1 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

3.Learned counsel for the first party has no objection ifthe reference is decided in terms of the application filed by the second party union .

[No. L-31011 /5/2003 - IR(B -II )] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer

ANNEXURE

4. In view of the above application of the second party union it is clear that the second party union is not entitled to any relief in these proceedings .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1

MUMBAI

5. The matter stands disposed of as above and the second party union is given liberty to take appropriate steps at an appropriate time for redressal of its grievance .

AnAward is made accordingly .

JUSTICE G S. SARRAF : Presiding Officer

JUSTICE G S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 1 /6 OF 2004 430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2011

w.c.f. 9-4-91 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the said workman is entitled ? "

Subsequently, the reference was transferred to this Tribunal for disposal in accordance with law.

का.आ. 187,--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय जीवन बीभा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ एनजीपी/103/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2.Onreceipt ofthe reference , parties were noticed to filetheir respective statement of claim and written statement, in response to which , the workman, Shri Prakash Parate ("theworkman " in short ) filed the statement of claim and the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India ("party no . 1 " in short) filed the written statement.

1.सं. एल-17012/42/1995- आईआर ( बी- II ) ]

शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी

iNew Delhi , the 22nd December, 2011

S.O. 187.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ret. No. CGIT/ NGP/103 /2004 ) of the Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

[No. L- 17012/42/ 1995- IR(B - II)] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER CGIT-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT / NGP/103/2004

Date: 27-9-2011

PartyNo.1 : The Senior Divisional Manager , Life

Insurance Corporation of India , National Insurance Building , Sardar V.P. Marg , P.O. Box No. 63 , Nagpur -440001.

Versus

PartyNo. 2 : Shri Prakash Parate , R/o. Maskasath Bangre Mohalla, Nagpur -440002 AWARD

(Dated: 27th September, 2011 )

The Case of the workman as projected in the statement of claint is that he was appointed by the party No. 1 on 19-1-199 ! as a peon and his first appointment was for 29 days i.e. from 19-1-1991 to 16-2-1991 and subsequently, the same was extended from 17-2-1991 to 18-03-1991 and then from 19-3-1991 to 8-4-1991 and he worked continuously for 80 days , from 19-1-1991 to 8-4-1991 with the party No. I without break and party No.1 orally terminated his services we f. 09-04-1991 and he was getting salary as a regular employee and as per the provisions of Section 25 -H of the Act and the standing orders , he is entitled to re - appointment as and when vacancies would arise and he subinitted a representation to the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Nagpur on 27-3-1995 and as the conciliation failed, failure report was submitted by the ALC to the Central Government and theCentral Government in its turn , referred the dispute to the Tribunal for adjudication . The further case of the workman is that he was performing regular nature of work and the post against which , he was appointed was a clear vacant post and he was appointed on temporary basis by the party No.1 , only with the intention of depriving him the benefits and status of permanency and as per clause D of themodel standing orders of the LIC , it was obligatory on the part of the management of LIC to prepare a list of the terminated employee and such terminated employees should be given preference in the matter of appointment, as and when the vacancies are available and as he is a terminated employee , he is entitled to be re - appointed and termination of his services without disclosing any reason and without giving any intimation is a revengeful action against him and colourable exercise of employer's right and against the principles of the natural justice and as such, his termination was not for any bonafide reason and the same is unfair and illegal .

The workman has prayed for his reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) ( "the Act " in short), the Central Government had referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India and their workman Shri Prakash Parate for adjudication , to Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court at Jabalpur as per letter No.L- 17012/ 42/ 95 - IR (B - II) dated 04-03-97, with the following schedule: -

"Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India in terminating the services of Shri Prakash Parate , a temporary peon

3. The party No.1 in its written statement has pleaded inter -alia that in view of the application of the workman , he was offered a temporary appointment for the post of peon, vide appointment letter dated 18-1-1991 and the appointment was for a period of 29 days and the appointment was not an appointment in any permanent vacancy and due to exigencies , the services of the workman were extended from 17-2-1991 to 18-3-1991 and then

কক [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

431

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24, 1933

by order dated 28-3-2000 was pleased to set aside the award dated 24-11-1999 and remanded the case back for considering the aspect of jurisdiction and to pass necessary orders on the reference . The Hon'ble Court also directed the parties to maintain status quo until the reference is decided by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal . In view of the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court as mentioned above , no order was passed on the petition filed by party No. I to set aside the ex -parte award .

6. The parties have ied oral evidence in support of their respective claims , besides placing reliance on documentary evidence . The workmaı: has examined himself as a witness , whereas , one Miss Sikha , Manager , P & IR Department has been examined as a witness on behalf of the party No. 1 .

The workman, in his examination- in-chief, which is on affidavit has reiterated the facts mentioned in the statement of claim . In his cross - examination , the workman has admitted that he was called for the temporary post of peon and no written test was taken and there was no advertisement calling applications and as , he was ready to work temporarily, order was given by the management on 19-1-1991 as per Exhibit M -5 and the order was for the temporary post of peon and was for a limited period of 29 days and his consent was taken while joining the work, in token of acceptance of the service conditions and the terms and conditions were incorporated in the appointment order itself and his services were extended as per orders , Exhibit M-6 and M - 7 on the same term and cor.ditions .

7. The witness examined on behalf of the party No. 1 has also reiterated the facts mentioned in the written statement , in her evidence , which is also on affidavit In her cross - examination , she has stated that the workinan had the requisite qualification for appointment as a peon and as such , he was appointed as a peon temporarily and as there was vacancy of the post of peon, the working period ofthe workman was extended from time to time and as there was vacancy of the post of peon , advertisement was given for recruitment of peon .

from 19-3-1991 to 8-4-1991 , vide letters dated 16-2-1991 and 15-3-1991 respectively and the workman worked for 80 days in total and as the appointment vide letter 15-03-1991 was for a specific period, i.e. from 19-3-1991 to 8-4-1991 only, the services ofthe workman automatically stood terminated w.e.f. 8-4-1991 evening and the appointment of the workman was on temporary basis against temporary vacancy. It is furtherpleadedby the party No.1 that the service conditions oftheemployees in the Life Insurance Corporation of India (" LIC " in short ) are not governed by any standing orders , but are governed by "Regulations " , called Life Insurance Corporation of India ( Staff) Regulation , 1960 ( " the Regulations " in short ) and the Regulations have been framed by virtue of power conferred on the LIC to make regulation initially under Section 49 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 ( " the Insurance Act " in short ) and thereafter by virtue of Section 48( cc) of the Life Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act , 1981 ( " Amendment Act " in short) and by virtue of clause ( cc) of Section 48 , the service conditions are now subject to the Rules , which are deemed to have come into effect from 20-6-79 and sub- section 2A of Section 48 provides that the Regulations and other provisions , as in force immediately before the commencement of the Amended Act with respect of terms and conditions of service of employees shall be deemed to be Rules made under clause (cc) of sub - section 2 of Section 48 and the Rules are framed with prior approval of the Central Government and therefore , these Rules are statutory Rules and the Hon 'hle Apex Court in the decisions reported in AIR 1994 SC - 1343 ( M. Venugopal Vs. LIC ) and AIR 1982 SC 1126 ( A.V. Nachane Vs. Union of India) have recognized these Rules as statutory Rules and these Rules have overriding effect over the Act and consequently the provisions of the Act , which are contrary to the statutory Rules governing the terms and conditions of service of employees of LIC have no effect and the model standing orders , which has been quoted by the workman has no application to the employees of LIC in regard to the terms and conditions of their services and as the appointment of the workman came to an end automatically in the evening of8-4-1991 , in absence of any extension, the question of disclosure of any reason for termination of services etc. does not arise and as such , the workman is not entitled for any relief.

4. It is necessary to mention here that after filing of the written statement , as the party No. I remained absent , the case proceeded ex - parte against it and by order dated 24-11-1999 , ex - parte award was passed in favour of the workman.

5.The party no. 1 , on 23-2-2000 filed an application for setting aside the ex - parte award dated 24-11-1999 . It is also appropos to metion here that the party no . 1 also filed writ petition no . 904 of2000 before the Hon 'hle High Court ofJudicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench challenging theex-parte award dated 24-11-1999 and the Hon'ble court

8. During the course of argument , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the workman that though the workman was appointed as temporary worker, he worked in a permanent nature ofjob of a peon and was paid wages at par with the scale of pay and other allowances as applicable to the permanent workers and under the Life Insurance Corporation of India ( Staff) Regulations , 1960 , there is no provision to terminate the services of an employee verbally. except after following the procedures as mentioned therein and as the procedure for termination of the services was not followed, the termination is illegal and the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

person appointed under sub-regulation ( 1 ) shall be entitled to claim absorption or preference for recruitment only by reason of such appointment .

9. Per contra, it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party No.1 that the workman was employed purely on temporary basis in temporary vacancy for a specific period and on expiry of the said period , his services automatically came to an end and the Regulations have overriding effect over the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and as such , no industrial dispute can be raised and the workman is not entitled for any relief.

In support of such contentions , reliance was placed bythe learned advocate for party No. 1 , on the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in writ petition No. 1655 / 2002 ( LIC Vs. Ravindra V. Ladhe & others) .

Parliament amended the provisions of the Life Insurance Corporation Act , 1956 by Amending Act 1 of 1981. As a result of the amendment, clause (cc ) was inserted insub-section (2) of Section 48 which confers power upon the Central Government to make rules to carry out the provisions of the Act . By and as a result of clause (cc) as inserted, the Central Government is empowered to provide for the terms and conditions of service of the employees of the corporation . The rule - making power in Section 48 (2) (cc) extends to the following:

"(cc) the terms and conditions of service of the employees and agents of the Corporation , including those who became employees and agents of the Corporation on the appointed day under this Act " .

Sub-section (2A) was also introduced in Section 48 by the Amending Act and it provides as follows:

10. It is clear from the evidence on record , both oral and documentary that the appointment of the workman was purely on temporary basis for a specific period and in the appointment order itself, it had been mentioned that the workman on the basis of his temporary appointment would not be entitled to either absorption in the service of the Corporation or any preference for recruitment to any post and the appointment would terminate automatically on the expiry of the period of appointment . It is also clear from the evidence on record that the workman accepted the conditions as given in the appointment letter and joined inservice .

11. The decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in WP No. 1655 of 2002 is a direct decision in regard to the point of controversy. The Hon'ble High Court ofBombay in its decision have stated as follows :

(2A) The regulations and other provisions as in force immediately before the commencement of the life Insurance Corporation (Amendment ) Act , 1981 , with respect to the terms and conditions of service of employees and agents ofthe Corporation including those who became employees and agents of the Corporation on the appointed day under this Act , shall be deemed to be rules made under clause (cc) of Sub-section (2 ) and shall , subject to the other provisions of this section , have effect accordingly " (emphasis supplied ) As a result of sub- section (2A) , the Staff Regulations that were framed in 1960 are deemed to be Rules made under clause (cc ) of sub- section (2 ) of Section 48 .

"Now in so far as the present case is concerned , it would be necessary advert first and for most to the Life Insurance Staff Regulations of 1960. These Regulations were initially framed by the corporation with the previous approval of the Central Government in exercise of powers conferredby Section 49 ( 2 ) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. Regulation 8 in relation to temporary staff provides thus:

Temporary Staff

Sub-section (2B) of Section 48 , as amended , provides that the rule making power that is conferred by clause (cc). of sub - section (2) shall include the power to give retrospective effect to the rules ; to amend the regulations and the provisions referred to in sub - section (2A) with retrospective effect from a date not prior to 20th June 1999 . Sub-section (2C) of Section 48 has a significant bearing in the present case and provides thus:

8( 1) Notwithstanding anything contained in these Regulations , a Divisional Manager may employ staff in Classes III and IV on a temporary basis subject to such general or special directions as may be issued by the Chairman from time to time .

---(2) No person appointed under sub - regulation ( 1 ) shall only by reason of such appointment be entitled to absorption in the service of the Corporation or claim preference for recruitment to any post .

"(2C) The provisions of clause (cc ) of sub- section (2) and sub -section (2B) and any rules made under the said clause (cc) shall have effect , and any such rule made with retrospective effect from any date shall also be deemed to have had effect from that date , notwithstanding any judgment , decree or order of any court , tribunal or other authority and notwithstanding anything contained in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , or any other law or any agreement , settlement , award or any instrument for the time being inforce " (emphasis supplied) .

Regulation 4 provides that the Chairman may, from time to time, isstie such instructions or directions as may he necessary to give effect to , and carry out , the provisions of the regulations and in order to secure effective control over the staff employed in the Corporation . In so far as the members of the temporary staff are concerned , sub- regulation (2 ) of Regulation 8 specifically providedthat no

Theeffect ofSub- section (2C) is to impart overriding effectto the provisions of clause (cc ) of sub- section (2) as well as to any rules which have been made under clause (cc) notwithstanding any judgment , decree or any order of [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

433

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

with Regulation 14 of the Regulations , which shall be deemed to be now Rules under Section 48(2)(cc) of the Corporation Act" .

any Court or Tribunal or other authority and notwithstanding anything contained in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or any other law or any other agreement, settlement or other instrument for the time being in force.

The Supreme Court noted that the constitutional validity of the Amending Act of 1981 was upheld in A.V. Nachane Vs. Union of India ( 1982) 1 SCC 205. The Court held that the wisdom of the legislature in either extending the protection of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , or denying the same cannot be assessed by the Court unless it is held to be violative of any of the provisions of the Constitution .

Regulations 8 of the Staff Regulation of 1960 which empowers the authority nominated therein to recruit class III and IV personnel on a temporary basis is , therefore , a rule within the meaning of Section 48 (2 ) (cc) . That is specifically provided for in sub- section 2A. A person appointed on a temporary basis under sub -regulation (1) ofRegulation 8 is not entitled to absorption in the services ofthe Corporation or to claim preference for recruitment to any post. In exercise of the power conferred by Regulation 4, statutory instructions were issued by the Chairman of the Corporation on 28th June , 1993 defining the method and manner of recruitment of temporary staff. These rules have overriding effect over the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Sub- section 2C ofSection 48 specifically provides so.

"Earlier such employees used to be governed by the regulations framed by the Corporation under Section 49 of the Corporation Act as well as by the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, being " workman " within the meaning of that Act . It was up to them to enforce the rights or remedies in terms of the regulation so framed under the Corporation Act or in accordance with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. But after the amendment introduced by the Parliament in Section 48 , the employees/ ofthe Corporation shall not be entitled to protections to which they were entitled before the coming into force of the amendment aforesaid . The amendments cannot be held to be violative ofArticle 14 of the Constitution merely on the grounds that a section of the employees of the Corporation had the benefit or protection of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, which now they have been deprived of. The wisdom of the legislature in extending the protection of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act or denying the same cannot be judged by the courts unless any such step held to be violative of any of the provisions of the Constitution .

The amended provisions of the Life Insurance Corporation Act , 1956 came up for consideration before a Bench of three Learned Judges of the Supreme Court inM. Venugopal Vs. Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India , Machilipatnam ( 1994) 2 SCC 323 . The Supreme Court held that as a result of the statutory fiction that is created by the provisions of sub - section (2A) , regulations relating to the terms and conditions of service of employees and agents of the Corporation framed under Section 48 (2) (bb ) shall be deemed now to be Rules under Section 48 ( 2) ( cc) and all " such rules shall have overriding effect over the provisions contained in the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947so far as the terms and conditions of employment of such employees who also conform to the requirement of the definition of " workman " under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 are concerned " . Construing these provisions , the Supreme Court held that the termination of the services of a person appointed as probationer under Regulation 14 shall be deemed to be in pursuance ofthe rules framed under Section 48 (2 ) ( cc) and would have overriding effect over Section 2 ( oo) and Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The Court held thus :

The decision of the Supreme Court concludes the present case . The Tribunal was in error in coming to the conclusion that the order of retrenchment must fail for failure to comply with the provisions of Section 25- F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workmen were temporary workmen . Under the terms of their engagement , their services could be dispensed with and the power to dispense with a member of the temporary staff isimplicit in Regulation 8 of the Staff Regulations of1960. Upon the enforcement of the Amending Act of 1981 , the regulation acquired the character of a rule framed under Section 48 (2)( cc) . The rule overrides the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by virtue ofthe provisions of Section 48 (2C) .

12. Applying the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Court as mentioned above to the present case at hand, it is found that the provisions of the model Standing Orders or the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , regarding appointment of employees and the terms and conditions of their services , to the Life Insurance Corporation of India and Regulation 8 of Life Insurance Staff Regulations , 1960 is applicable to LIC and upon the enforcement of the Amending Act of 1981 , the The amendments introduced in Section 48 of the Corporation Act have clearly excluded the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act so far as they are in conflict with the rules framed under Section 48 (2) (cc ) . The result whereof will be that termination of the service of the appellant shall not be deemed to be " retrenchment" within the meaning of Section 2(00) even if sub - section (bb ) had not been introduced in the said section . Once Section 2 (oo) isnot attracted , there is no question of application of Section 25 - F on the basis of which the termination of the service of the appellant can be held to be invalid. The termination ofthe service ofthe appellant during the period of probation is in terms of the order of appointment read 2G1/12-22 434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

AWARD

regulation acquired the character of a rule framed under Section 48 ( 2 ) ( cc) and the said rule overrides the provisions of the Act and other laws for the time being in force, by virtue of the provisions of Section 48(2) ( cc) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act . As the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations 1960 has overriding effect on the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the reference is not maintainable and as such , this Tribunal has nojurisdiction to decide the dispute .Hence, the workman is not entitled for re -employment in preference over others , as per the provisions of Section 25-H of the Act and he is not entitled for any relief.

Hence , it is ordered :

ORDER

The action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India in terminating the services of Shri Prakash Parate, a temporary peon w.e.f. 9-4-91 is legal andjustified. The workman is not entitled for any relief.

J. P. CHAND , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 22 दिसम्बर , 2011

1.Amalgamation of the Laxmi Commercial Bank with the Canara Bank ( in short the Bank) in 1985 , resulted in to formation of one business from those run by the two banks . As a result of that merger of business , Smt . Sangeeta Khanna (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) become an employee of the Bank . On 29-2-92, while working as a clerk in Kalkaji branch of the Bank, she allegedly mis - behavioured with Sh.V. N. Malhotra , Special Assistant and Sh.T. N. Ramakrishnan, the Manager of the branch. She threw away articles lying on manager's table and pushed chair hither and thither. Smt. Isha Bhandari , and Sh. L. N. Arya tried to pacify her but in vain . She was taken to strong room by Smt . Isha Bhandari and offer a glass of water, which she splashed. That incident was witnessesd by the customers and staff present in the branch. She was suspended and charge-sheeted for the misconduct . A domestic enquiry was constituted . Sh . Ram Kumar, the Enquiry Officer , conducted the enquiry and submitted his report dated 23- 10-92 to the Disciplinary Authority. A punishment of stoppage of three increments with cumulative effect was awarded to her. She was reinstated and directed to report atNehru Place branch of the Bank.

का.आ. 188. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 225/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/407/1995- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 22nd December , 2011

2. Appeal filed by the claimant came to be dismissed . Sheapproached to the Canara Bank Employees Congress (Regd.), Delhi , for espousal of her claim. The aforesaid union, sent a demand to the Bank for withdrawal of punishment. When demand of the union was not conceded to, a dispute was raised before the Conciliation Officer . On failure of conciliation proceeding , the dispute was referred to this Tribunal by the appropriate Govt. for adjudication vide order No. L - 12012/ 407/95 - IR(B - 1) , New Delhi dated 3rd of January, 1997 , with the following terms: ---

S.O. 188. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 225/ 2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21-11-2011 .

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in awarding of stoppage of three increments with cumulative effect vide their order dated 15-2-93 to Smt . Sangeeta Khanna, clerk was justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the said workman entitled and with what date ?" [No. L- 12012/407/ 1995- IR(B - II) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE Dr. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX : DELHI

I. D. No. 225/2011

Smt . Sangeeta Khanna,

Pkt . A- 10/27 -B , Kalkaji Extn . , New Delhi .

...Workman

Versus

3. Claim statement was filed by the claimant , pleading that since the date of merger of the Laxmi Commercial Bank, the management of the Bank started step motherly treatment with the employees of erstwhile Laxmi Commercial Bank. She unfolds that action of the Bank was challenged before the Apex Court and the Court directed the Bank to take those employee , who were excluded from the list of employees , in its services on the same terms and conditions asapplicable to them before amalgamation . The Bank has been perpetuating a policy ofharassment and victimization ofthe employees of the erstwhile Laxmi Commercial Bank.

The General Manager ,

Canara Bank , Delhi Circle , Marshal House , New Delhi .

4. The claimant details that the bank refused to sanction casual leave in her favour, when she exhausted her maternity leave period . She was threatened with a

...Management

ad 435 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012 /पौष 24 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

disciplinary action in case of her not joining the duties . Shejoined her duties in hope that attitude of her officers would change .However her hope turned to be wrong . The Bank was seeking opportunities on one pretext or the other to harass the employees of the category referred above . She informed Circle Office as well as Regional Office in 1991, about maltreatment and harassment , being subjected to her at Kalkaji branch. No curative steps were taken . On the other hand the authorities started issuing fake memos toher.

Deputy General Manager was not her Disciplinary Authority and rules do not empower the Bank to award punishment of stoppage of increments with comulative effect . She appeared for personal hearing and questioned validity ofthe findings ofthe Enquiry Officer and authority ofthe Deputy General Manager to impose penalty, referred above . Her submission was not appreciated and punishment of stoppage of three increments with comulative effect was awarded to her , vide order dated 11-2-93. She was reinstated but period of suspension was treated as not spent on duty and not to be reckoned for any purpose . She prefered an appeal which was rejected mechanically on 12-7-1993 . She claimed that the enquiry be declared as violative of principles of natural justice and penalty awarded to her may be set aside .

5. The claimant unfolds that on 29-2-92 at about 12 noon Sh . T. N. Ramakrishna , the Manager, shouted at her to keep shut up before the staff and the customers . He lowered her image in the eyes of her colleagues and customers. She had not offered any provocation to him. She was shocked with said attitude of the Manager and went to know reasons of such insulting behaviour. The Manager could not give any reason for the said behaviour. Onthe other hand , he ordered her forcible removal and got her illegally confined in the strong room .

6. The claimant further details that vide order dated 14-3-92 , she was suspended . A charge - sheet was also served on her , which contained false allegations to the knowledge of the Bank . She was surprised and shocked thatinstead oftaking action against the Manager , she was made a scape-goat . She submitted her statement ofdefence on 30-3-92, denying all allegations levelled on her. Inspite ofsatisfactory explanation , the Bank constituted an enquiry and appointed Sh . Ram Kumar as Enquiry Officer. She projects that neither the charge- sheet nor order constituting an enquiry against her was issuedby the Competant Authority.

9. The Bank demurred the claim that employees of erstwhile Laxmi Commercial Bank were treated step- motherly. It projects that scheme of amalgamation was made and employees , whose names appeared in the schedule of the said scheme , were taken over by the Bank in terms of said scheme. Subsequently names of all employees were included in the schedule , as per directions of the Apex Court. The Bank pleades that on 29-2-92 around 12.00 noon , the claimant was found speaking in a very high tone to Sh . V.N. Malhotra, Special Assistant, in its Okhla Kalkaji branch . Sh. T. N. Ramakrishnan , Manager, requested her to lower her voice but she did not listen to him . Since it caused disturbance to the work of the Bank and the claimant had not paid any heed to the advice of the Manager, he asked her to shut up. Immediately she threw away various articles lying on his table, caused partly damage to one of the adding machine and pushed chairs hither and thither. Smt. Isha Bhandari and Sh . L. N. Arya tried to claim her down but she persisted in her disorderly behaviour. Thereafter she was taken to strong room by the Smt . Isha Bhandari and offered a glass of water, which she splashed . Entire incident was witnessed by the customers and staff present in the branch .

10. Facts were investigated by Sh . P. K. Batra , who submit his report dated 6-3-92 , confirming her acts of misconduct. She was suspended on 14-3-92 and a charge- sheet was served on her. An enquiry was constituted and Sh . Ram Kumar was appointed as Enquiry Officer by the Disciplinary Authority. Issuance of charge- sheet as well as appointment of Enquiry Officer is claimed to have been made by the Competent Authority.

7. She attacks the action of the Bank, claiming that no Presenting Officer was appointed and Enquiry Officer acted as presenting officer as well as judge of the matter. TheEnquiry Officer made roving enquiries and conducted searching cross - examination of the defence witnesses . In order to fill in the gaps , he even re - examined the witnesses oftheBank. He was instrumentally of the Bank and did not act as an independent person . He grossly violated principles of natural justice . The enquiry conducted was an empty formality. He gave credence to the statement of the witnesses examined by the Bank and brushed aside the defence witnesses . In his report , he ensured to record finding against the claimant . The enquiry conducted by him was not in consonance with the bipartite settlement and rules , which were in vogue.

11. The Bank proceeds further claiming that it was not obligatory on the Disciplinary Authority to appoint a presenting officer. It has been disputed that the Enquiry officer acted as a presenting officer as well as a judge. He conducted the enquiry with all fairness and gave full and fairopportunities to the claimant to defened herself. She appointed a defence representative of her choice , who cross-examined all witnesses of the Bank . The Enquiry Office has a right to re -examine any witness , if any additional 8. The claimant conceds that show cause notice dated 28-10-92 was received by her. She submitted a detailed reply on 16-11-92, projecting infirmities in the report of the Enquiry Officer . On 20-11-92, the Deputy General Manager communicated to her that he agreed with findings and proposed punishment of stoppage of four increments with commulative effect . She was called for personal hearing on 3-12-92. According to her, the

2G1/12-23 436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

[PART II--SEC. 3(ii ) ]

proportionality of punishment awarded to her . Ms. Neha Bhatnagar , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the bank . I have given my careful considerations to the argument advanced and cautiously perused the record . My findings on questions referred in the reference order are as follows :

evidence comes over the record during the course of cross- examination of the witnesses by the other side . She was allowed to examine her- self, and other witnesses in defence . Her claim that the Enquiry Officer acted as an instrumentality of the Bank is uncalled for. The Enquiry Officer had taken into account the evidence brought before him and rightly reached the findings recorded by him.

18. As emerge out of the record , Smt. Sangeeta Khanna was charge - sheeted for gross misconduct committed by her on 29-2-92 at her work place . The events , relating to her misconduct, are as follows:

12. The Disciplinary Authority accepted findings of the Enquiry Officer and gave an opportunity to her to present facts on proposed punishment . After granting personal hearing , punishment of stoppage of three increments with cumulative effect was award to her . She preferred an appeal , which was dismissed by the Appellate Authority. Her claim that the Deputy General Manager was not Disciplinary Authority, is baseless , pleads the Bank . Stoppage of increments with cumulative effect is in accordance with service code applicable to the employees of the Bank . After participating in the enquiry, she started claiming that the enquiry was not in consonance with service code.

13. The Bank presents that the Enquiry Officer was independent and contention of the claimant, to the effect that he was biased and prejudiced, are baseless . He gave full opportunity to her to defend herself. Conclusions drawn bythe EnquiryOfficer, in his report , are based on evidence and reasons . He has appreciated depositions of witnesses , giving due weight to their testimony. Punishment awarded to her commensurate to her misconduct . Para 85 of the Shastri Award provides for stoppage of increments with cumulative effect. Her service conditions are governed by Shastri Award, Desai Award and Bipartite Settlement , pleads by the Bank .

"On 29-2-92 , at around 12 noon , while working in the OD Section she was speaking in a very high tone to Shri V. N. Malhotra (49957 ) Special Assistant working in S.B. Section . Shri Rama Krishnan (7660) Manager requested her repeatedly to lower her voice which she failed to do . As her continued speaking in a high tone was disturbing his work as well as other besides a large number of customers being present in the branch , Shri Rama Krishanan asked her to shut up. She immediately thereafter threw away the key box containing duplicate keys lying on the Manager's table , two methodic electronic adding machines , punching machines , ledgers , registers , stamp pad, files etc. besides pushing the chairs which act of her caused partial damage to one of the adding machines . Sint . Isha Bhandari (45333 ) Clerk and Sri L.N. Arya ( 18963 ) , Special Assistant tried to calm her down but she persisted with her disorderly behaviour of throwing the said articles . Thereafter she was taken to the strong room by Smt . Isha Bhandari and offered a glass of water which she splashed" .

14. Her appeal was considered and found un -tenable . The Bank presents that in view of these facts , the appropriate Govt . ought to have refused to refer the dispute for adjudication . This Tribunal cannot exercise a powers to adjudicate the terms of reference , agitates the Bank. A prayer has been made that the claim may be discarded, being devoid of merits .

15. On the pleading of the parties , following issue were settled:

( i) Whether the domestic enquiry conduct by the management against the workman is fair and proper?

( ii) In terms of reference .

19. Misconducts detailed above amounted to willful disobedience of lawful and reasonable orders of the branch manager, riotous or disorderly behaviour on the premises ofthebank, willful damage and attempt to cause damage to the property ofthe bank and those acts being prejudicial to the interest of the bank , within the meaning of clause 3 (d) , 3( k) , 3 (j ) and 3 ( m) of the Canara Bank Service Code, claims the Bank . It was argued that punishment awarded to the claimant was far below in proportion to misconducts committed by her. On the other hand the claimant urged , in her claim statement that the Bank was not competent to award punishment of stoppage of three increments with cumulative effect . As emerge out of her claim , no such power is available to the Bank to award punishment of "stoppage of increment " that too with " cumulative effect " . The Bank agitates that such power is available to it under awards , bipartite settlements and Service Code applicable to the claimant .

16. Ram Kumar was examined by the bank to discharge onus of the preliminary issue . Smt . Sangeeta Khanna entered the witness box to rebut facts proved by the bank . After hearing the parties and on consideration of evidence and written submissions the preliminary issue was decided in favour of the bank and against the claimant , videorder dated 4-8-11 .

17. Claimant opted not to advance argument on

20. For an answer to proposition so raised , it is expedient to detail disciplinary powers available to the Bank. Shastri Award enlists gross misconduct and minor misconduct in respect of which disciplinary action may be 437

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(e) have his misconduct condoned and be merely discharged.

taken against an employee . In para 521 (4) it defines gross misconduct as following acts and omissions on the part of anemployee:

22.Minor misconduct shall mean any ofthe following acts and omission on the part of an employee , as obtained in para 521 (6) ofthe Shastri Award:

"(4) By the expression " gross misconduct " shall be meant any of the following acts and omissions on the part of an employee;

"( 6) By the expression "minor misconduct " shall be meant any of the following acts and omissions on the part of an employee;

(a) engaging in any trade or business outside the scope of his duties except with the permission ofthe bank;

(a) absence without leave or overstaying sanctioned leave without sufficient grounds;

(b) unpunctual or irregular attendance;

(d) breach of any rule of business of the bank or instruction for the running of any department ;

(b) unauthorized disclosure of information regarding the affairs of the bank or any of its customers or any other person connected with the business of the bank which is confidential or the disclosure of which is likely to be prejudicial to the interests of the bank;

(e) committing nuisance on the premises of the bank;

(f) entering or leaving the premises of the bank except by an entrance provided for the purpose;

(d) willful damage or attempt to cause damage to the property ofthe bank or any of its customers;

(e) willful insubordination or disobedience of any lawful and reasonable order of the management or ofa superior;

(g) attempt to collect or collecting monies within the premises of the bank without the previous permission of the management or except as allowed by any rule or law for the time being in force;

(h) holding or attempting to hold or attending any meeting on the premises ofthe bank without the previous permission of the management or except in accordance with the provisions of any ruleor law for the time being in force;

(f) habitual doing of any act which amounts to "minor misconduct " as defined below, "habitual " meaning a course of action taken or persisted in notwithstanding that at least on three previous occasions censure or warnings have been administered or an adverse remark has been entered against him;

(g) willful slowing down in performance ofwork;

(h) gambling or betting on the premises of the bank;

(i) canvassing for union membership or collection of union dues or subscriptions within the premises of the bank without the previous permission of the management or except in accordance with the provisions of any rule or law for the time being in force;

(i) speculation in stocks , shares , securities or any commodity, whether on his account or that of any other persons;

(1) failing to show proper consideration, courtesy or attention towards officers , customers or other employees of the bank; unseemly or unsatisfactory behavior while on duty;

(j ) doing any act prejudicial to the interests of the bank, or gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss ;

(k) marked disregard of ordinary requirements of decency and cleanliness in person or dress ;

(k) giving or taking a bribe or illegal gratification from a customer or an employee of the bank;

(1) incurring debts to an extent considered by the management as excessive ;

(1) abetment or instigation of any of the acts or omissions above mentioned" .

23. Punishment which may be awarded for minor misconduct have been maintained in para 521 (7) of the said award , which are extracted thus:

21. In para 521 (5 ) penalties which may be imposed for gross misconduct have been detailed which are extracted thus :

"(7) An employee found guilty of minor misconduct may:

"(5) An employee found guilty of gross misconduct may:

(a) be dismissed without notice , or

(a) be warned or censured ; or

(b) have an adverse remark entered against him , or (b) be warned or censured , or have an adverse remark entered against him , or

(d) have his increment stopped, or 438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 14, 2012/PAUSA 24, 1933

24. In para 18.28 , Desai Award makes it clear that procedure laid down by Shastri Tribunal " for termination of employment and taking other disciplinary action " in paragraphs 520 and 521 and in paragraphs 518 and 519 to the extent quoted above , subject to the modification indicated shall remain the same.

25. Inbipartite settlement dated 19th October, 1996 commonly known as Ist bipartite settlement no change was made either in the misconducts described as gross misconduct or minor misconduct , besides penalties provided for the same . In para 19.9 it was mentioned that a workman find guilty of a misconduct , whether gross or minor, shall not be given more than one punishment in respect of anyone charge . In settlement dated 22-11-79 , punishments provided for gross - misconduct were supplemented with following punishments , besides those already provided :

(a) have his special allowance withdrawn , or (b) have his pay reduced to the next lower stage up to a maximum period of two years , in case he had reached the maximum in the scale of pay.

26. In sixth bipartite settlement dated 14-2-95 following sub clauses were added under the head "gross misconduct " , defined in 1st bipartite settlement and Shastri Award:

(p) remaining unauthorisedly absent without intimation continuously for a period exceeding 30 days;

( q) misbehaviour towards customers arising out of bank'sbusiness ;

(r ) contesting election for Parliament/Legislative Assembly/Legislative Council/Local Bodies/ Municipal Corporation / Panchayat , without explicit

written permission of the bank;

27. Following clauses were also added under "minor misconduct " defined in 1st bipartite settlement and Shastri Award:

(n) refusal to attend training programmes without assigning sufficient and valid reason.

(o) not wearing while on duty, identity card issued by the bank.

28. Punishments , provided for gross misconduct by Shastri Award and 1st bipartite settlement were substituted by sixth bipartite settlement . In para 21 ( 4) following punishments were provided for gross misconduct.

(a) be dismissed without notice ; or

(b) be removed from service with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/ or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] time and without disqualification from future employment; or

(c) be compulsorily retired with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment; or

(d) be discharged from service with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment; or

(e) be brought down to lower stage in the scale of pay up to a maximum of two stages ; or (f) have his increment/ s stopped with or without cumulative effect; or

(g) have his special pay withdrawn; or

(h) be warned or censured , or have an adverse remark entered against him; or

(i) be find .

29. Various acts of misconduct were added to the definition of " gross misconduct " by bipartite settlement dated 10-4-2002. Sub - para (5) ofthe said settlement defines " gross - misconduct " as any of the following acts and ommissions on the part of an employee:

(5) By the expression " gross misconduct " shall be meant any of the following acts and omissions on the part ofanemployee:

(a) engaging in any trade or business outside the scope of his duties except with the written permission ofthe bank;

(d) willful damage or attempt to cause damage to the property of the bank or any of its customers;

(e) willful insubordination or disobedience of any lawful and reasonable order of the management orof a superior;

(f) habitual doing of any act which amounts to "minor misconduct " as defined below , " habitual " meaning a course of action taken or 439

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14, 2012/पौष 24, 1933

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(d) showing pornography; or

(e) any other unwelcome physical , verbal or non -verbal conduct of a sexual nature .

persisted in, notwithstanding that at least on three previous occasions censure or warnings have been administered or an adverse remark has been entered against him;

(g) willful slowing down in performance ofwork;

(u) (For State Bank of India)

(h) gambling or betting on the premises of the bank;

the giving or taking or abetting the giving or taking of dowry or demanding directly or indirectly from the parents or guardians of a bride or bridegroom. as the case may be , any dowry" .

(i) speculation in stocks , shares , securities or any commodity whether on his account or that of any other persons ;

30. Punishments for " gross misconduct " were enlisted in sub - para (6) of the said settlement as follows:

(j ) doing any act prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank or gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss;

"(6) An employee found guilty of gross misconduct may:

(a) be dismissed without notice; or (k) giving or taking a bribe or illegal gratification from a customer or an employee of the bank;

(1) abetment or instigation of any of the acts or omission above mentioned;

(m) knowingly making a false statement in any docuiment pertaining to or in connection with hisemployment in the barnk;

(b) be removed from service with superannuation benefits ie . Pension and/ or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment; or

(c) be compulsorily retired with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and Gratuityas would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment; or

(n) resorting to unfair practice of any nature whatsoever in any examination conducted by the Indian Institute of Bankers or by or on behalt ofthe bank and where the employee is caught in the act of resorting to such unfair practice and a report to that effect has been received by the bank from the concerned authority;

(d) be discharged from service with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and Gratuityas would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment; or

(e) be brought down to lower stage in the scale of payup to a maximum of two stages ; or (o) resorting to unfair practice of any nature whatsoever in any examination conducted by the Indian Institute of Bankers or by or on behalf of the bank in cases not covered by the above Sub-clause ( n ) and where a report to that effect has been received by the bank from the concerned authority and the employee does not accept the charge;

(f) have his increment/ s stopped with or without cumulative effect ; or

(g) have his special pay withdrawn ; or (p) remaining unauthorisedly absent without intimation continuously for a period exceeding 30 days;

(h) be warned or censured , or have an adverse remark entered against him; or (q) misbehaviour towards customers arising out of bank's business ;

(i) be find.

(r) contesting election for Parliament/Legislative Assembly/Legislative Council / Local Bodies/ Municipal Corporation /Panchayat , without explicitwritten permission of the bank;

31. Sub-para (7) of the said settlement defines " minor misconduct " as any of the following acts and omissions on the part of an employee :

(a) absence without leave or overstaying sanctioned leave without sufficient grounds;

(s) conviction by a criminal Court of Law for an offence involving moral turpitude;

(b) unpunctual or irregular attendance;

(t) indulging in any act of ' sexual harassment ' of anywoman at her workplace;

(d ) breach of any rule of business of the bank or instruction for the running of any department ;

Note: Sexual harassment shall include such unwelcome sexually determined behaviour (whether directly or otherwise ) as

(a) physical contact and advances ;

(e) committing nuisance on the premises of the bank;

(b) demand or request for sexual favours:

440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14, 2012 /PAUSA 24, 1933

(f) entering or leaving the premises of the bank except by an entrance provided for the purpose;

(g) attempt to collect or collecting moneys within the premises of the bank without the previous permission of the management or except as allowed by any rule or law for the time being in force;

(h) holding or attempting to hold or attending any meeting on the premises of the bank without the previous permission of the management or except in accordance with the provisions of any rule or law for the time being in force;

( i) canvassing for union membership or collection of union dues or subscriptions within the premises of the bank without the previous permission of the management or except in accordance with the provisions of any rule or law for the time being in force;

(j ) failing to show proper consideration, courtesy or attention towards officers , customers or other employees of the bank , unseemly or unsatisfactory behavior while on duty;

(k) marked disregard of ordinary requirements of decency and cleanliness in person or dress ;

(1 ) incurring debts to an extent considered by the management as excessive ;

(m) resorting to unfair practice or any nature whatsoever in any examination conducted by the Indian Institute of Bankers or by or on behalf of the bank in cases not covered by sub - clause (n) under "Gross Misconduct " and where a report to that effect has been received by the bank from the concerned authority and the employee accepts the charge;

(n) refusal to attend training programmes without assigning sufficient and valid reasons ;

(0) Not wearing, while on duty, identity card issued by the bank;

(p) Not wearing , while on duty, the uniforms supplied by the bank , in clean condition.

32. Punishments , which may be awarded for minor misconduct , are detailed in sub para ( 8 ) of the settlement as follows:

" 8. An employee found guilty of minor misconduct may:

(a) be warned or censured ; or

(b) have an adverse remark entered against him; or (c) have his increment stopped for a period not longer than six months " .

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 33. The Canara Bank Service Code , as on 292.92 , projected following acts as "gross misconduct" ;

(a) Knowingly making the false statement in any return , report declaration , statement, bill or information submitted or given in the course of hisemployment in the Bank;

(b) engaging in any trade or business outside the scope of his duties except with the written permission of the bank;

(c) Breach of obligation of secrecy imposed on him by Regulation 4 of Chapter VI of this Code , or the disclosure of any secret or confidential information in contravention of the said Regulation;

(d) willful insubordination or disobedience of any lawful and reasonable order of the management or of a superior;

(e) willful slowing down in performance of work;

(f) giving or taking a bribe or illegal gratification from a customer or an employee of the bank;

(g) gambling or betting on the premises of the bank;

(h) speculation in stocks , shares , securities or any commodity whether on his account or that of any other persons ;

(i) gross negligence i.e. to say negligence involving or likely to involve the Bank in serious loss .

(1 ) willful damage or attempt to cause damage to theproperty ofthe bank or any of its customers;

(k) drunkenness or riotous or disorderly or indecent behavior on the premises of the bank;

(1 ) habitual doing of any act which amounts to "minor misconduct " as defined below, "habitual " meaning a course of action taken or persisted in , notwithstanding that at least on three previous occasions censure or warnings have been administered or an adverse remark has been entered against him;

(m) doing any act which is prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank;

(n) abetment or instigation of any of the acts or omissions above mentioned;

(o) knowingly making a false statement in any document pertaining to or in connection with hisemployment in the bank.

(p) resorting to unfair practice of any nature whatsoever in any examination conducted by the Indian Institute of Bankers or by or on behalf ofthe bank and where the employee is caught in the act of resorting to such unfair practice and a report to that effect has been received by the bank from the concerned authority.

441 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 14 , 2012/पौष 24 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(q) resorting to unfair practice of any nature whatsoever in any examination conducted by the Indian Institute of Bankers or by or on behalf of the bank in cases not covered by the above sub-clause (p) and where a report to that effect has been received by the bank from the concerned authority and the employee does not accept the charge .

34. Punishment , which maybe imposed for gross misconduct , are enumerated by the Service Code as follows:

"4. An employee found guilty of gross misconduct

may:

a. be dismissed without notice ; or

b. be removed from service with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/ or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment; or

C. be compulsorily retired with superannuation benefits i.é. Pension and /or Provident Fund and Gratuityas would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment ; or

them of the same either because of their misconduct or gross inefficiency. The wage scale has to be so devised that it provides for the growing needs ofthe workman and his family. Stoppage of increments , therefore , is more or less by way of punishment . The giving of increments should not be regarded as a matter ofbounty at the sweet will and pleasure of the management . At the same time the management should have the right to see that workmen keep up the normal standard of efficiency and not lapse into indifference and inefficiency because of the assured prospect of an incremental scale . We therefore ,direct that increments should normally be given and stoppage of increments by managements should be only by way of punishment for proved misconduct or gross inefficiency. As a working rule , if in the previous year there are three adverse remarks in the service register of the workman entered against him as a result of the management's enquiry into his conduct and after consideration of any explanation given by him , it may be taken as a prima facie case for stopping the increment at the next stage and for the next year. If an employee's increment is to be withheld it should only be done after a proper charge- sheet has been framed against him and he has been given adequate opportunity to defend himself. The order in writing withholding the increment should also mention whether it will have the effect ofpostponing future increments . "

d. be discharged from service with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/ or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment: or

e. be brought down to lower stage in the scale of pay up to a maximum of two stages ; or

f. have his increment/s stopped with or without cumulative effect ; or

g. have his special pay withdrawn ; or

h. be warned or censured , or have an adverse remark entered against him; or

i. be fined .

36. Section 13 of the General Clauses Act , 1897 enacts that in all Central Acts and Regulations , unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context ( 1 ) words inmporting the masculine gender shall be taken to include the females , and (2 ) words in the singular include the plural and vice versa . Though the provisions of Section 13 of the aforesaid Act is not applicable to the provisions of bipartite settlements and Sastri Award, referred above , yet applying the analogy enacted therein the words have his " increment stopped " shall be construed. The word " increment " shall represent singular aswell as plural , thereby meaning that at appropriate stage itmay be read as " increments " also. Such construction was drawn by the Sastri Tribunal , which is evident out of para 85 of its award . Consequently I am constrained to ahnounce that the punishment "have his increment stopped" shall be read " have his increments stopped " . In view of these reasons , it is announced that the bank may award a penalty of stoppage of future increments to its employce on proof of gross misconduct.

35. Whether punishment of having " increment stopped " as provided , prior to settlement dated 10-4-2002, would mean an increment or further increments ? As noted above, punishment in that regard no where specify it to be future years . However , Shastri Award spoke of withholding of future increments as a measure of punishment . In paragraph 85 , it was provided therein that an order of punishment should mention whether withholding of increment will have the effect of postponing future increments . For convenience provisions of para 85 ofShastri Award are detailed as follows:

37.As projected above Smt . Sangeeta Khanna had disobeyed lawful orders of her superior , displayed riotous or disorderly behaviour at the premises of the bank , caused damage and attempted to cause damage to the property to the bank and acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the bank . Her case has been that the branch manager "85. Workmen should normally have the benefit of the annual increments as a matter of course , provided there is not a substantially good reason to deprive THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 14 , 2012 /PAUSA 24 , 1933

442

shouted " shut up " at her before her colleagues and customers . Question , which may require this Tribunal to give considerable thoughts , is as to whether she was provoked by the branch manager to behave in a disorderly manner? Ifyes whether it mitigates her acts of misconduct? As facts tell Smt . Sangeeta Khanna was talking in loud tone to Sh . V.N.Malhotra . She was requested by the branch manager to lower down her tone , but to no avail. At that juncture the branch manager commanded to her shut up. When an employee talks in loud tone with his colleagues and disturbs tranquility and atmosphere of work place, his superior is duty bound to maintain order . Command of superior to such an employee to lower down his tone cannot be said to be provocative . When such a command is not obeyed, the superior has a right to order his subordinateto shut up . Such a harsh command cannot permit a subordinate to loose his temper and behave in a riotous or disorderly manner. Facts detailed above no where show that the branch manager provoked Smt . Sangeeta Khanna to behave in riotous or disorderly manner.

38. Assuming that command of " shut up " could provoke Smt. Khanna, even in that situation , she cannot claim exoneration from her acts of gross misconduct. The fact that the branch manager was not proceeded departmentally would not lesson her acts of gross misconduct Discipline at the work place was to be maintained by Smt . Khanna . She cannot make discipline to suffer, when such a command is given to her. Provocation , if any, would show such circumstances which mayjustify leniency in punishment . It could if not wipe out her acts of misconduct . Not only that Smt . Khanna behaved in riotous

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] ordisorderly manner , she threw away articles lying on the table of branch manager . By that act one of the adding machines was damaged. She threws away chairs hither and thither. When a glass of water was offered to her, she splashed it . All these events make out that Smt . Khanna created a scene and behaved like a bull in China shop . Therefore it emerges that misconducts committed by Smt . Khanna were gross and major. She cannot escape punishment for such misconducts.

39. Punishment award to her was of stoppage of three increments with cumulative effect . As held above , the bank was competent to stop more than one increment that too with cumulative effect , as a measure of punishment . Whether the punishment award to Smt . Khanna is disproportionate to acts of her misconduct ? At the cost of the repetition , it is said that acts of misconduct of Smt . Khanna were grave and serious . Bank has been considerate enough when punishment was awarded to her . It cannot be said that punishment was disproportionate , not to talk of shockingly disproportionate , to acts of her misconduct . No case of victimization or unfair labour practice emerge over the record. There arc no reasons with this Tribunal to interfere withthe discretion of the bank in award of punishment to Smt . Khanna. Accordingly I find the act ofthe bank, in award of punishment to Smt . Khanna vide order dated 15-2-93 , to be legal as well as justified . No case of interference withthat punishment is made out. Smt . Khanna is not entitled to any relief. Questions , referred to this Tribunal , are answered accordingly, and an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Govt . for publication .

Dated : 9-9-2011

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .