रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD, NO . D. L. (N ) 04/0007/2003-05
भारत का राजपत्र सत्यमेव जयते The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 11 ]
नई दिल्ली, मार्च 11 भार्च17 , 2012 , शनिवार/फाल्गुन 21 फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
No. 111
NEW DELHI , MARCH 11- MARCH 17, 2012 , SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 21 - PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it maybe filed as a separate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड( ii ) PART II-Section 3- Sub- section ( ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 2 मार्च , 2012
Advocate, as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting cases relating to RTI matter in the High Court of Kerala and appeals / revisions or other matters arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law.
[F. No. 225/56/2011 -AVD- II ]
RAJIV JAIN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 5 मार्च , 2012
का.आ. 1014.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973 ( 1974 की अधिनियम सं. 2) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल उच्च न्यायालय में सूचना का अधिकार मामलों से संबंधित मामलों तथा अपीलों/पुनरीक्षणों अथवा विधि द्वारा स्थापित अपीलीय न्यायालयों या पुनरीक्षणों में इन मामलों से उद्भूत अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के लिए श्री एस. श्रीकुमार , वकील को लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 225 /56/2011 - एवीडी- II ] राजीव जैन , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training ) New Delhi , the 2nd March, 2012
का. आ. 1015.- केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली में आरसी 7 ( एस )/2005- एससीबी- II/ दिल्ली, आरसी . 8 ( एस )/2005 - एससीबी- II/दिल्ली , आरसी. 24(एस)/2005 - एससीयू-1/नई दिल्ली तथा आरसी . 25 ( एस ) / 2005 - एससीयू-1/नई दिल्ली ( श्री सज्जन कुमार तथा अन्य के विरुद्ध ) से उत्पन्न मामलों तथा विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण या अपीलीय न्यायालयों में उक्त मामलों से उत्पन्न अपीलीय , पुनरीक्षण मामले या अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के लिए श्री विकास पाहवा , वकील को विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
S.O. 1014. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri S. Sreekumar,
[सं. 225/3/2012- एवीडी- II ] राजीव जैन , अवर सचिव 686 G1/2012
(2483) [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2484
New Delhi , the 5th March , 2012
34 के अतर्गत पुलिस स्टेशन चांदमारी , जिला- कामरूप ( मेटरो ) में पंजीकृत केस सं. 114/09 का तथा प्रयास , दुष्प्रेरणा तथा उपर्युक्त उल्लिखित अपराध के संबंध में या उससे संबद्ध षड्यंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के दौरान किए गए या उन्हीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न कोई अपराध याअपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों तथा क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार समस्त असम राज्य के सम्बन्ध में करती है ।
[फा. सं. 228/17/2012- एवीडी-11 ] राजीव जैन, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th March, 2012 S. O. 1015. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (8 ) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Vikas Pahwa , Advocate as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting the cases arising out of CBI cases RC 7 ( S ) / 2004 / CBI/SCB - II / New Delhi, RC 8(S)/2005/CBI/ SCB - II/ New Delhi, RC 24(S)/ 2005/CBI/SIU.land RC 25 (S)/2005/CBI/SIU/SC.I/New Delhi (against Shri Sajjan Kumar and others ) in the Hon'ble High Court at New Delhi and appeals , revisions or other matter arising out of the said cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law.
[F. No. 225/3/2012 -AVD- II ] RAJIV JAIN, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च , 2012
का.आ. 1016.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 की अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उड़ीसा उच्च न्यायालय , कटक मे अभियोजन , अपीलों, पुनरीक्षणों या दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा अन्वेषित मामलों से उत्पन्न अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के लिए श्री वी. नरसिंह , वकील को केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के त्रिशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
S. O. 1017. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Assam, Political (A) Department , Dispur vide Notification No. PLA.21 / 2012/ 20 , dated 27.01.2012, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State ofAssam for investigation of Case No. 114/09 under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) read with section 27 ofthe Arms Act , 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959 ) registered at the Police Station Chandmari , District Kamrup (Metro) and attempt, abeunent and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offence and any other offence or offences cominitted in course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
[फा. सं. 225/5/2012- एवोडी-11 ] राजीव जैन , अवर सचिव
[F. No. 228/ 17/2012- AVD- il ] RAJIV JAIN , Under Secy.
New Delhi , the 9th March , 2012
नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2012 S.O. 1016. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Crimina! Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri V. Narasingh Advocate , as Special Public Prosecutor ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation ) in the Orissa High Court at Cuttack for conducting the prosecution appeals , revisions or other matters arising out of the cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police establishment (CBI).
[F. No. 225/5 /2012-AVD- 11 ] RAJIV JAIN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2012
का. अश. 1018. केंद्रीय सरकार रतद्वारा दिल्लो विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मध्य प्रदेश सरकार, गृह विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्या एफ-12-22/2012/बी-1 /दो दिनांक 13-3-2012 द्वारा प्राप्त सहम्मति से भारतीय दंड संहिता 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम संख्या 45) की धारा 302 , 307 के अंतर्गत श्री नरेन्द्र कुमार, भा.पु.से. पुलिस अनुभागीय अधिकारी , बामौर , जिला मुरैना की हत्या के संबंध में थाना बामौर , जिला मुरैना में दर्ज अपराध संख्या 49/2012 तथा उपरोक्त अपराध से जुड़े या सम्बन्धित प्रयास , उकसाना और षडयंत्र करने और इस चलन में अन्य किए गए या उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अपराध एवं अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण मध्य प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।
['फा. सं. 228/24/2012- एवीडी- II ] राजीव जैन, अवर सचिव का. आ. 1017. केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए असम राज्य सरकार , राजनैतिक (ए ) विभाग , दिसपुर की दिनांक27-1-2012 की अधिसूचना सं पी.एल.ए. 21/2012/20 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से शस्त्र अधिनियम , 1959 ( 1959 काअधिनियम सं. 54) की धारा 27 के साथ पटित भारतीय दंड संहिता, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) को धारा 302 और [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2485 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
नाम क्रम सं. 27 से हटाया जाता है क्योंकि क्रम सं. 7 पर उनके नाम का उल्लेख पहले ही किया गया है ।
[फा. सं. 809/2/2011- एफ ( सी) ] निरूपमा कोतरू , निदेशक (फिल्म)
MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
New Delhi , the 10th February, 2012
S. O. 1020.-In partial modification of this Ministry'sNotification of even number , dated 19-1-2012, thename ofShri Surendrakumar Y. Tripathi , Advisory Panel Members , CBFC , Mumbai at S.No. 27 stand deleted as his name has already been mentioned at S. No. 7.
[F. No. 809/2/2011 -F (C)] NIRUPAMA KOTRU , Director (Films) New Delhi , the 14th March , 2012 S. O. 1018. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the StateGovernment of Madhya Pradesh Home Department, Mantralaya Bhopal , vide Notification No. F.12-22/2012/B- i ( wo ) dated 13.03.2012 , hereby extends the powers and jur diction of the meinbers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Madhya Pradesh for investigation of Crime No. 49/2012 under sections 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860 ) registered at Police Station Banmore District Morena relating to murder of Shri Narendra Kumar, IPS, SDOP and attempt , abetrnent and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offence and any other offence or offences committed in course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
नई दिल्ली , 15 फरवरी , 2012
[F. No. 228/24/2012 -AVD- II ] RAJIV JAIN , Under Secy.
शहरी विकास मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2012
का. आ. 1019.-केन्द्र सरकार दिल्ली विकास अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 61 ) की धारा 3 की उप धारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( छ) के साथ पठित उपखण्ड ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री डी. दीप्ति विलास , अपर सचिव , शहरी विकास मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार को तत्काल प्रभाव से दिल्ली विकास प्राधिकरण में सदस्य के रूप में नामित करती है ।
का. आ. 1021 ,- इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 19-01-2012 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचनाओं संख्या फा. सं. 809/2/2011 - एफ ( सी ) , 809/3/2011 - एफ ( सी ) , 809/4/2011 - एफ ( सी ) , 809/6/2011- एफ (सी ) और फा. सं. 809/10/2011 - एफ ( सी ) के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम , 1983 के नियम 7 व 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के प्रत्येक सदस्य के सामने विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों में सलाहकार पैनलों से निम्नलिखित सदस्यों के नामों को एतद्वारा तत्काल प्रभाव से निष्कासित करती है ।
क्रम सं. सदस्य का नाम
सलाहकार पैनल [ फा. सं. के -11011 /21 /2004- डीडीए। ए ] एन. टी. जोसेफ , अवर सचिव
1. श्रीमती देवयानी किरन
मुबंई
MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
2. श्री वी. ई श्रीनिवासन
बंगलौर
New Delhi , the 5th March , 2012
3. श्री ए. जयप्रकाश
त्रिवेंद्रम
4. श्रीमती तंकामोनी दिवाकरन त्रिवेंद्रम
5.
त्रिवेंद्रम
श्री गिरिजा सेतुनाथ
6.
त्रिवेंद्रम
सुश्री लक्ष्मी पी. नायर
7.
दिल्ली
डॉ. दुर्गेश त्रिपाठी
8.
दिल्ली
डॉ. ( श्रीमती ) चयनिका
S.O. 1019. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) , read with clause (g ) of sub - section (3 ) of section 3 of the Delhi Development Act , 1957 ( 61 of 1957) , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri D. Diptivilasa , Additional Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development , Government of India , as Member of the Delhi Developrnent Authority, with immediate effect .
उनियाल पांडा
9. श्री वीर विक्रम सिंह
दिल्ली
[F. No. K- 11011 /21 /2004- DDIA] N. T. JOSEPH , Under Secy. ( DDIA)
10.
दिल्ली
डॉ. मधुमिता चक्रवर्ती
11.
दिल्ली
सुश्री दीपमाला मोहन
सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2012
12. श्री बिमल कृष्णा सर्मा
गुवाहटी
[फा. सं. 809/3/2011- एफ ( सी ) ] निरूपमा कोतरू , निदेशक ( फिल्म) का. आ. 1020. इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 19-01-2012 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना में आंशिक आशोधन करते हुए श्री सुरेन्द्र कुमार वाई. त्रिपाठी , सलाहकार पैनल सदस्य , सीबीएफसी मुंबई का [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2486
New Delhi , the 15th February, 2012
S. O. 1021. In continuation of Ministry's Notifications Nos . 809/2/2011 -F (C), 809/3 /2011 - F (C ) , 809/ 4/2011 - F(C) , 809/6/2011 -F (C) and 809/ 10/2011 - F(C) , dated 19.01.2012 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (37 of 1952) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government hereby removes names of the following members from the Advisory Panels at the Regional Offices as specified against each member , of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect:-
Sl . Name of Member
Advisory Panel
No.
Mumbai
1. Smt . Devayani Kiran
2. Shri V.E. Srinivasan
Bangalore
Trivandrum
3. Shri A Jayaprakash
-do-
4. Smt . Thankamony Divakaran
-do-
5. Smt. Girija Sethunath
-do-
6. Ms. Lakshmi P Nair
Delhi
7. Dr. Durgesh Tripathi
-do-
8. Dr (Smt) Chayanika Uniyal Panda
-do-
9. Shri Veer Vikram Singh
10. Dr. Madhumita Chakraborty -do-
-do-
11. Ms. Deepmala Mohan
Guwahati
12. Shri Bimal Krishna Sarma
[F. No. 809/3 /2011 - F (C) ] NIRUPAMA KOTRU , Director (Films)
नई दिल्ली , 16 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1022. चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम , 1983 के नियम 7 और 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड का हैदराबाद सलाहकार पैनल गठित करती है तथा निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक जो भी पहले हो , उक्त पैनल के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है । यह अधिसूचना इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10 नवंबर , 2009 के अधिसूचना सं. 809/3/2009- एफ ( सी ) के अधिक्रमण में जारी की जा रही है ।
क्रम सं. नाम
1. श्री सूर्या नायक
2. श्री गंगाधर गौड
3. श्री वयला मोहन राव
4. श्री कटनेनी उमामहेश्वर राव
5. श्री चिट्टीनेनी लक्ष्मीनारायण
6. श्री गोगीनेनी दीनामणी
7. डॉ. वनजा उदय
8. श्री शेरी सुभाष रेड्डी
9. श्री बी. सांई सुब्रमणियम
10. श्री ओ. विजयम
11 . श्री पुली नवीन राज
12. लायन एस. वेंकटेश्वरलु ( सांई वेंकट )
13. श्री एम. माधव रेड्डी
14. श्री एम. उदय कुमार
15. श्री टैटीनेनी सीता रामा स्वामी
16. श्री सी. एच. प्रभाकर
17. श्री बंदी सीताराम रेड्डी
18. श्री खाजा मोइनुद्दीन
19. श्री अडप्पा नारायण रेड्डी
20. श्री कवाथापु श्रीनिवास राव
21 . श्री बचुन्गुदम सतीश रेड्डी
22. श्री के. सुब्रमणियम
23. श्री के. मानवता राव
24. श्री जी. वेंकट रेड्डी
25. सुश्री पी रेवती गौड
26. श्री के. शंकर दास
27. श्री हरि बाबू अनंता
28. सुश्री गड्डी पद्मावती
29. श्री पी. नरेन्द्र गौड
30. श्री गोगुला श्रीनिवास
31. श्री अन्नम कल्याण श्रीनिवास
32. श्री क्रांति शिवा शंकर
33. श्री जी. राजा राव
34. श्री पर्वतनेनी जगन मोहन राव
35. श्रीमती जक्कुला इंदिरा
36. श्रीमती शाइक परवीन जानी
37. श्रीमती कनकनला विजय रेड्डी
38. श्री एस. आर. शेखर
39. श्री वी . मंगा रेड्डी
40. श्री आलम गोपाल राव [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2487
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
79.
श्री टांडरा विनोद राव
41. श्री यारापोटु कोटी बाबू
80. श्रीमती बी. राधा
42. श्री शेशु कुमार बीवी
43. श्री अब्दुल अजीज
81 .
श्रीमती डी. शैलेन्द्र कुमारी
44. श्री पेरूमाला कोंडला राव
82.
श्री परूचुरी कृष्णा
83. श्री सतीश खन्ना
45. श्रीमती सत्या संजीवी मुदिली 84. श्रीमती सीमा भूलक्ष्मी
46. श्रीमती पलागुम्मी सीता
47. श्री बैंका रमेश
85.
श्रीमती गुडला वेंकट रमानी
86.
श्री के. राम मोहन राव
48. श्री मद्दीरला कमलाकर राव 87. श्री के. उमा महेश्वर राव
49. श्री वेच्चा कृष्णा मूर्ति
88.
श्रीमती वी. प्रभावती
50 . श्रीमती कस्तूरी निर्मला
51 . श्री नौपदा सत्यनारायण
89.
श्री पी.वी. रमेश
52. श्री कोटा प्रसाद
90.
श्रीमती गंगुला अरूणा
91.
श्री चिकती संतोष राजा
53. श्री गोदवर्ती रामाकृष्ण राव
92.
श्री पैडी राजू गरिकिना
54. सुश्री उमा देवी गोटुमुक्कला 93. श्री शाहिक शाहजहां
55. श्री एम. मधुमोहन
56. श्री एन. अजय कुमार
94.
डॉ. पी.सी. रायुलु
57. श्री मोहम्मद जगनगीर
95. श्री बोडनी शंकर यादव
96.
श्री बंदेद्री राम जोगी
58. श्री नोमुला प्रकाश राव
59. श्री टेकुला महेश्वर राव
97.
श्रीमती बीराम इंदिरा रेड्डी
98.
श्रीमती रूद्रपति इशरताम्मा
60. श्री रामा सहायम रंगा रेड्डी
99. श्री एस.सी.वी. नायडू
61 . श्री वी. रामाकृष्णा राजू
62. श्री उमामहेश्वर राव
100. श्री एम. वेंकटरम्मना
63. श्री किशोर बाबू गुट्टा
101.
श्री डी. मधुसुदन राव
64. श्री डोकाला मुरली
102.
श्री ओद्रु सुंदरा रामी रेड्डी
103.
श्रीमती अन्ना मल्लेश्वरी यादव
65. श्रीमती लकानी पदमा कमला कुमारी 66. श्रीमती चित्तुरी इंदिरा
104.
श्री चरणजीत सिंह सलूजा
67. श्री कोमती सत्यनारायण
105.
श्री डी.वी. बाला सुब्रमण्यब
106. डॉ. आर. ए. पद्मानामा राव
68. श्री मुरली कृष्णा
69. श्री चिकटी संतोष राजा
107.
श्री यालागन्दुला रामू
70. श्रीमती वी. नागारत्नम भगवतरिनी 108. श्री मल्लादी रामाकृष्णा
71. श्री एस. के. अफसर
109. श्री अबंती दयाकर रेड्डी
72. श्री एन. श्रीनिवास
110. श्री कोटापल्ली श्रीनिवास रेड्डी
111. श्रीमती पी. पद्मावती
73. श्री पी. वेंकट सीतारामनजेयुलु ( रामू) 74. श्री वी. उदय भास्कर रेड्डी
112. श्रीमती वाई. सुनीता चौधरी
75. श्री आनंद वरला
113.
डॉ. एस. सरत ज्योत्सना रानी
76. श्रीविद्यासागर क्रांति
114. श्रीमती अनुराधा पद्मानाभन
115.
श्रीमती टी. पद्मजा रेड्डी
77. श्री मदीपतला सूर्या प्रकाश
116.
श्रीमती एल. राधा राजेश्वरी
78. श्री मुल्लापुदी मोहन [ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17, 2012 / PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2488
117. श्रीमती ललिता अय्यर
118. श्री एन. एस. प्रसाद
119. श्रीमती रमानी बलभद्रपथरूनी
120. श्री वमसी रामाराजू
121 . श्री जदलान्नगिरी पेड्डा हुसैन्नहा
122. श्री शाहिक काजा मोहनुद्दीन
123. सुश्री जी. गीतांजलि
124. श्रीमती पाराचुरी विजया लक्ष्मी
125. श्री वेमुरी सुभाष चन्द्रबोप्स
126. श्री औरूगान्ती वैंकटश्वरलु
177. डॉ. डाटला वेंकटा नरसिंह। राजू
128. डॉ. श्रीनिवासलु रेड्डी एग
120 श्री दिही रामबाबू
130 श्रीमती नगुलापाली धिनी
[फा. नं. 809/5/2011 - एफ ( मी) निरूपमा कोतरू , निदेशक ( फिल्म ) New Delhi , the 16th February , 2012
S. O. 1022. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (37 of 1952) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph (Certification ) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to constitute the Hyderabad advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification and to appoint the following persons as members of the said panel with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier. This supersedes thisMinistry's Notification No. 809/3 /2009 - F(C) dated 10th November, 2009.
1. Shri M. Surya Naik
2. Shri Gangadhar Goud
3. Shri Vayala Mohan Rao
4. Shri Katneni Umamaheshwara Rao
5. Shri Chittineni Lakshminarayana
6. Shri Gogineni Dinamani
7. Dr. Vanaja Uday
8. Shri Sheri Subash Raddy
9. Shri V. Sai Subramanyam
10. Shri O. Vijayam
11. Shri Puli Naveen Raj
12. Shri S. Venkateswarlu
13. Shri B. Mafhava Reddy
14. Shri M. Uday Kumar
15. Shri Tatineni Sita Rama Swamy
16. Shri C. H. Prabhakar
17. Shri Bandi Seetharam Reddy
18. Shri Khaja Moinuddin
19. Shri Adapa Narayana Reddy
20. Shri Kavathapu Srinivasa Rao
21. Shri Bachungudam Sathish Reddy
22. Shri K. Subramanyam
23 . Shri K. Manavata Roy
24. Shri G. Venkat Reddy
25. Ms. P. Revati Goud
26 . Shri K. Shankar Das
27. Shri Hari Babu Anantha
28 . Shri Gaddi Padmavaini
29. Shri . P. Narender Goud
30. Shri Gogula Srinivas
31. Shri Annan: Kalvan Stinivas
32. Shri Karnati Siva Sankar
33. Shri G. Raja Rao
34. Shri Parvathaneni Jagan Mohana Rao
35. Smt . Jakkula Indira
36. Mrs. Shaik Parveen Jani
37 . Smt . Kankanala Vijaya Reddy
38. Shri S. R. Shekhar
39. Shri V. Manga Reddy
40. Shri Allam Gopal Rao
41. Shri Yarrapothu Koti Babu
42. Shri Sheshu Kumar BV
43 . Shri Abdul Aziz
44. Shri Perumalla Kondala Rao
45. Smt . Satya Sanjeevi Mudili
46. Smt. Palagummi Seetha
47. Shri Banka Ramesh
48. Shri Maddirala Kamalakara Rao
49. Shri Vetcha Krishna Murthy
50. Smt . Kasthuri Nirmala
51. Shri Naupada Satyanarayana
52. Shri Kota Prasad
53. Shri Godavarthy Ramakrishna Rao [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2489
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
54. Ms. Uma Devi Gottumukkala 93. Shri Shaik Shajahan
55. Shri M. Madhumohan
94. Dr. P. C. Rayulu
95. Shri Boini Shankar Yadav
56. Shri N. Ajay Kumar
96. Shri Bandreddi Rama Jogi
57. Shri Mohd. Jagangir
58. Shri Nomula Prakash Rao
97. Sınt . Beeram Indira Reddy
59. Shri Tekulaa Maheshwar Rao 98. Smt. Rudrapati Isranthamma
99 .
Shri S.C.V. Naidu
60. Shri Rama Sahayam Ranga Raddy 100. Shri M. Venkataramana
61. Shri V. Ramakrishna Raju
62. Shri G. Umamaheswara Rao 101. Shri D. Madhusudhana Rao
63. Shri Kishore Babu Gutta
102. Shri Oduru Sundara Rami Reddy
64. Shri Dokala Murali
103. Smt . Anna Malleswari Yadav
65. Siit . Lakani Padma Kamala Kumari 104. Shri Charanjit Singh Salooja
66. Smt . Chitturi Indira
105. Shri D.V. Bala Subramanyab
106. Dr. R.A. Padmanabha Rao
67. Shri Komati Satyanarayana
68. Shri D. Murali Krishna
107. Shri Yalagandula Ramu
108. Shri Malladi Ramakrishna
69. Shri Cheekati Santosh Raja
70. Smt. V. Nagarathnam Bhagavatharini 109. Shri Ambati Dayakar Reddy
71. Shri S.K. Afsar
110. Shri Kottapalli Srinivas Reddy
72. Shri N. Srinivas
111. Smt . P. Padmavathi
73. Shri P. Venkat Sitharamanjeyulu 112. Smt . Y. Sunithz Chowdhary
24. Shri V. Udaya Bhaskar Reddy 113. Dr. S. Sarat Jyothsana Rani
75. Shri Anand Varala
114. Smt . Anuradha Padmanabhan
76. Shri Vidyasagar Karnati
115.
Smt. T. Padmaja Reddy
77. Shri Maddipatia Surya Prakash 116 . Smt . L. Radha Rajeswari
78. Shri Mullapudi Mohan
79. Shri Tandra Vinod Rao
117. Smt. Lalitha Iyer
118. Shri M.S. Prasad
80. Smit . B. Radha
119. Smt . Ramani Balabadhrapathruni
81. Smt. D. Shailendra Kumari
120. Shri Vamsee Ramaraju
82. Shri Paruchuri Krishna
121. Shri Jadalannagiri Pedda Hussainaiah
83. Shri Satish Khanna
122. Shri Shaik Kaaja Mohiddin
84. Smt . Simma Bhulakshmi
85. Smt . Gudla Venkata Ramaní
123. Ms. G. Geetanjali
124. Smt . Parachuri Vijaya Lakshmi
86. Shri K. Rama Mohana Rao
125. Shri Vemuri Subash Chandrabose
87. Shri K. Uma Maheshwar Rao 126. Shri Oruganti Venkateswaralu
88. Sat. V. Prabhavathi
127. Dr. Datla Venkata Narasimha Raju
89. Shri P.V. Ramesh
12S. Dr. Srinivasulu Reddy. M
129. Shri Diddi Rambabu
90. Smt . Gangula Aruna
91. Shri Cheekati Santosh Raja
130. Smt . Nagulapalli Padmini
92. Shri Paidi Raju Garikina
[F. No. 809/5/2011 - F(C)] NIRUPAMA KOTRU , Director (Films) 2490
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2011 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
स्वास्थ्यएवं परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय
( स्वास्थ्यएवं परिवार कल्याण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1023.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद अर्हता की नामावली में परिवर्तन के कारण उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है अर्थात्:-
उक्त अनुसूची में -
(क ) " डा. एन.टी.आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा " के समक्ष शीर्षक " मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता " [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित को अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , नामतः-
2
3
" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन " ( मनोरोग विज्ञान )
एम डी ( मनोरोग विज्ञान )
( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह डॉ. पीनामनेनी सिद्धार्थ इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइंसेज एंड रिसर्च, कृष्णा जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के बारे में डा. एन. टी.आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा द्वारा वर्ष 2011 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )
(ख) " डा. आर.एम.एल. अवध विश्वविद्यालय फैजाबाद , उत्तर प्रदेश " के समक्ष शीर्षक " मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता " [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षकं " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित को अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा, नामतः- " मास्टर ऑफ संर्जरी ( नेत्र विज्ञान ) "
एम एस ( नेत्र विज्ञान)
(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह इरा लखनऊ मेडिकल कालेज व अस्पताल , लखनऊ, उत्तर प्रदेश में प्रशिक्षित विद्यार्थियों के बारे में डा. आर.एम.एल. अवध विश्वविद्यालय फैजाबाद , उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा वर्ष 2011 में अथवा उसके बाद में प्रदान की गई हो) ।
सभी के लिए टिप्पणी:
1 . स्नातकोत्तर पाठ्यक्रम को प्रदान की गई ऐसी मान्यता की अधिकतम अवधि 5 वर्षों के लिए होगी जिसके उपरांत इसका नवीकरण कराना होगा ।
2. मान्यता को उप - खंड 4 की आवश्यकता के अनुसार समय पर नवीकरण न कराए जाने पर संबंधित स्नातकोत्तर पाठ्यक्रम में प्रवेश निरपवाद रूप से बंद हो जाएंगे ।
[सं. यू. 12012/2/2012- एमई ( पी- II ) ] अनिता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health and Family Welfare )
New Delhi , the 18th January, 2012
S.O. 1023. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India hereby, makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , due to change of nomenclature of the qualification namely :-
2491 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
In the said Schedule -
(a) against " Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijayawada " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the neading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' [ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :--
3
2
MD (Psychiatry)
"Doctor ofMedicine (Psychiatry) "
(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijayawada in respect of students being trained at Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute ofMedical Sciences & Research , Krishna Dist . , Andhra Pradesh on or after 2011 .
(b) against " Dr. RML Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' [ hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading Abbreviation for Registration ' [ [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted namely
MS (Ophthalmology)
"Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) "
(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Dr. RML Avadh University , Faizabad , Uttar Pradesh in respect of students being trained at Era's Lucknow Medical College& Hospital , Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh on or after 2011 .
Note to all : 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years , upon which it shall have to be renewed .
2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub - clause -4 shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course .
[No. U- 12012/ 2/2012 - ME ( P - II) ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secу .
जल संसाधन मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 27 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1024.- केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में इस मंत्रालय के मुख्य अभियंता के कार्यालय , प्रबोधन ( द. ) , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , बेंगलूर कार्यालय को, जिसमें 80 % कर्मचारिवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।
[सं. 1/1/2008- हिन्दी ]
रमेश बाबू अणियेरी , निदेशक ( रा.भा. )
MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES New Delhi , the 27th February, 2012
S.O. 1024. In pursuance of Sub - rule (4) of rule ( 10) ofthe Official Languages (Use for Official purposes of the Union ) Rules 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the office of the Chief Engineer , Monitoring ( S) Organisation, Central Water Commission , Bangalore of this Ministry , the 80 % staff whereof have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .
[No. 1 / 1 /2008 -Hindi ]
RAMESH BABU ANIYERY, Director (OL)
686 G1/2012-2 245
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2011 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय
(वाणिज्य विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 6 मार्च, 2012
का, आ. 1025.--केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम , 1964 के नियम 12 के उप- नियम ( 2 ) के साथ पठित , निर्यात स्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स मिनिरल लैब सर्विसेज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड जो कि एक्स- ओमा , IV/D ओल्ड मारिटाइम कालेज अकादमी कैम्पस बाडापाडिया, पारादीप -754 142 , जिला जगतशिंहपुर , ओडिशा , में स्थित है को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधिके लिए भारत सरकार के वाणिज्य मंत्रालय , की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर , 1965 के साथ उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट खनिज और अयस्क ( समूह - Ⅰ ) अर्थात् लौह अयस्क के निर्यात से पूर्व निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन , पारादीप में उक्त खनिजों और अयस्कोंका निरीक्षण करने के लिए एक अभिकरण के रूप में मान्यता देती है , अर्थात्ः-
(i ) मैसर्स मिनिरल लैब सर्विसेज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड जो कि एक्स- ओमा, IV/ D मारिटाइम कालेज अकादमी कैम्पस बाडापाडिया , पारादीप -754 142 , जिला जगतःिहपुर , ओडिशा, खनिजों और अयस्कों, समूह 1 का निर्यात ( निरीक्षण ) नियम , 1965 के नियम 4 के अधीन निरीक्षण का प्रमाण- पत्र अनुदत्त करने के लिए उनके द्वारा अनुसरण की गई निरीक्षण की पद्धति की परीक्षा करने के लिए, इस निमित्त निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा नार्मानिर्दिष्ट अधिकारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधाएं देगा; और
(ii ) मैसर्स मिनिरल लैब सर्विसेज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड जो कि एक्स-ओमा , IV/D ओल्ड मारिटाइम कालेज अकादमी कैम्पस बाडापाडिया , पारादीप -754 142 , जिला जगतशिंहपुर, ओडिशा , इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने कृत्यों के पालन में ऐसे निदेशों द्वारा आबद्ध होगा , जो निदेशक ( निरीक्षण और क्वालिटी नियत्रण ) , निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद्द्वारा समय - समय पर लिखित में दिए जाएं ।
[फा. सं. 4/14/2011- निर्यात निरीक्षण ]
डी.एस. ढेसी, संयुक्त सचिव
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce )
New Delhi , the 6th March , 2012
S.O 1025.-- In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection ) Act , 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , read with sub - rule ( 2) of rule 12 of the Export ( Quality Contro ! and Inspection) Rules, 1964 , the Central Government hereby recognises , M/ s Minerals Lab Services Private Ltd. locatedat EX - OMA , IV/D, Old Maritime College Academy Campus , Badapadia , Paradip - 754142, Dist : Jagatshingpur , Orissa , as an Agency for a period of three years from the date of publication of this notification , for the inspection of Minerals and Ores Group- 1, namely, Iron ore , specified in the Schedule annexed to the Ministry of Commerce notification number S.O. 3975 dated the 20th December 1965 , prior to export of aforesaid minerals and ores at Paradip , subject to the following conditions , namely:--
( i) M/ s Minerals Lab Services Private Ltd. , EX- OMA , IV/D, Old Maritime College Academy Campus , Badapadia , Paradip - 754142 , Dist : Jagatshingpur, Orissa , shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in granting the "Certificate of Inspection" under rule 4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores - Group I ( Inspection ) Rules , 1965;
( ii) M/ s Minerals Lab Services Private Ltd. , EX- OMA , IV/D , Old Maritime College Academy Campus , Badapadia . Paradip - 754142 , Dist : Jagatshingpur, Orissa, in the performance of their function under this notification shall be boundby such directives as the Director ( Inspection and Quality Control ) may give in writing from time to time .
[ F. No. 4/ 14/2011 -Export Inspection]
D. S. DHESI , Jt . Secy.
2493 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली , 6 मार्च , 2012
का.आ. 1026.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम , 1964 के नियम 12 के उप - नियम ( 2 ) के साथ पठित, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स ईटालैब प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, प्रथम तल , प्लॉट नं. 25 , डा. राजकुमार रोड , बेल्लारी -583 101 को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए भारत सरकार के वाणिज्य मंत्रालय , की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर , 1965 के साथ उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट खनिज और अयस्क ( समूह -1 ) अर्थात् लौह अयस्क के निर्यात से पूर्व निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन , बेल्लारी में उक्त खनिजों और अयस्कों का निरीक्षण करने के लिए एक अभिकरण के रूप में मान्यता देती है , अर्थात्ः-
( i ) मै. ईटालैब प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , प्रथम तल , प्लॉट नं. 25 , डा. राजकुमार रोड, बेल्लारी -583 101 खनिजों और अयस्कों , समूह -1 का निर्यात (निरीक्षण ) नियम , 1965 के नियम 4 के अधीनं निरीक्षण का प्रमाण- पत्र अनुदत्त करने के लिए उनके द्वारा अनुसरण की गई निरीक्षण की पद्धति की परीक्षा करने के लिए, इस निमित्त निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा नामनिर्दिष्ट अधिकारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधाएं देगा; और
( ii ) मै . ईटालैब प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , प्रथम तल , प्लॉट नं. 25 , डा. राजकुमार रोड, बेल्लारी -583 101 इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने कृत्यों के पालन में ऐसे निदेशों द्वारा आबद्ध होगा , जो निदेशक ( निरीक्षण और क्वालिटी नियंत्रण ) , निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा समय - समय पर लिखित में दिए जाएं ।
[फा. सं. 4/15/2011- निर्यात निरीक्षण ] डी.एस. ढेसी, संयुक्त सचिव
New Delhi , the 6th March , 2012
S.O. 1026. - In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the Export ( Quality Control and Inspection ) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ) , read with sub - rule (2 ) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 1964, the Central Government hereby recognises , M/s Italab Private Limited, located at I Floor , Plot No. 25, Dr. Rajkumar Road , Bellary - 583 101 , Karnatka, as an Agency for a period of three years from the date of publication of this notification , for the inspection of Minerals and Ores Group - 1 , namely, Iron ore , specified in the Schedule annexed to the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce number S.O. 3975 dated the 20th December 1965 , prior to export of the said minerals and ores at Ballary, subject to the following conditions , namely: --
( i ) that M/s ltaiab Private Limited, I Floor, Plot No. 25 , Dr. Rajkumar Road , Bellary - 583 101 , Karnatka , shall give adequate facilities to the officers . nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in granting the " Certificate of Inspection " under rule 4 of the Export ofMinerals and Ores - Group I (Inspection) Rules , 1965 ; and
(ii) that M/ s Italab Private Limited , I Floor, Plot No. 25. Dr. Rajkumar Road , Bellary- 583 101 , Karnatka, in the performance of their functions under this notification shall be bound by such directions as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control ) , Export Inspection Council may give in writing from time to time .
[F. No. 4/15/2011 - Export Inspection] D. S. DHESI , Jt. Secy .
2494
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17 , 2011 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
[PART Ii-SEC . 3( ii)]
उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
( उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1027.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि. , नं. - 377/22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन , बंगलौर-560027 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) वाले ""डीएस-852 जी " शृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इंएसएसएई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/490 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है ! इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । वैक्यूम फ्लोरसेंट डिस्पले ( वी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
DS - 852G Series
आकृति- 2- मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान
डिस्पले की बाडी से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सील किया जाता है । सील को डिस्पले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से जोड़ा गया है , उसके बाद इन दो छेदों से सील वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * या 5x10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 295 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2495 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
(MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs )
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1027.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy class -II ) of Series " DS - 852G " and with brand name " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Essae Teraoka Limited , No. 377 / 22, 6th Cross , Wilson Garden , Bangalore - 560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 10 /490;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 600g and minimum capacity of 200mg. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Florescent Display ( VFD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
DS - 852G Series
Essae
000
។
Figure- 2--Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of simitar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of5000 to 100,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k, or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.
[ F.No. WM -21 (295)/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2496
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2011 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1028.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि. , नं. - 377/22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन , बंगलौर-560027 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डीसी -300" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " डीजी " है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/491 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
DC - 300 Series
Sealing screw
आकृति- 2 -मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान
डिस्पले की बाडी से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सील किया जाता है । सील को डिस्पले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से जोड़ा गया है , उसके बाद इन दो छेदों से सील वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
i
[.फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (295 )/2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2497 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1028. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " DC- 300 " and with brand name " DIGI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s . Essae Teracoka Limited , No. 377/22, 6th Cross, Wilson Garden , Bangalore- 560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10 /491 ;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 100kg and minimum capacity of 400g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD) display in dicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
DC - 300 Series
Sealing screw
Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the raodel .
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 , or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .
[ F.No. WM-21 (295 )/2010]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2011 / PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2498
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का.आ. 1029.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि., नं. -377/22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन , बंगलौर -560027 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , X ( x ) , जहां x = । वाले " एसआई-810 एफएम " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण- केन/टीन फिलिंग मशीन ( विस्कास/नॉन विस्कास लिक्विड ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ईएसएसएई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/492 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण -पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण- केन/टीन फिलिंग मशीन (विस्कास/नॉन विस्कास लिक्विड ) है । इसकी उत्पादकता 50 कि.ग्रा. या समान वॉल्यूम की बारंबारता के साथ 150 फिल्स प्रति घंटा ( अधिकतम) है जो उत्पाद की प्रकृति और मात्रा पर निर्भर है । मशीन को सभी प्रकार विसकॉस/नॉन-विसकॉस आयल जैसे मस्टर्ड आयल , जिंगिली आयल , सूरजमुखी का तेल आदि के भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
SI -810FM Filling Machine
Essae
scaling area Sealing wire to be insert provided boledis 2mm in forms & The with scaling plate & seal
आकृति- 2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ , कवर और बरास्केट के ऊपर से चार बोरेड स्क्रू में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर कसा गया है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 295) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2499 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1029. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model ofAutomatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument -Can/Tin Filling Machine ( Viscous /Non Viscous Liquid) belonging to Accuracy Class X (x ) where x = l of ' SI - 810 FM' serieswith brand " ESSAE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s Essae Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22 , 6th Cross , Wilson Garden , Bangalore -560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/492;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument Can/Tin Filling Machine (Viscous /Non Viscous Liquid) . It has the output up to 50kg or equivalent volume with a frequency of weighing 150 fills per hour ( max) depending upon the quantity and nature of the product . The machine is designed for filling all types of viscous and non -viscous oils like mustard oil , Gingili oil , Sunflower oil , etc , The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
SI -810FM Filling Machine
scaling area
Sealing wire tobe insert provided hole dia 2mm In fomt & rear covera The with sealing plate & seal.
Figure-2-Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model .
On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealing wire is fastened through four bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket , for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The indicator cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM -21 ( 295 )/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 686 GI/2012-3 2500
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2011 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का.आ. 1030.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एस्से टेरोका लि. , नं. - 377/22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन , बंगलौर -560027 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग , X(x ) , जहां x = 1 वाले " एसआई-810 बीएफ " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण - बैरल फिलिंग मशीन ( विस्कास/नॉन विस्कास लिक्विड ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ईएसएसएई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/493 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण - बैरल फिलिंग मशीन ( विस्कास/नॉन विस्कास लिक्विड ) है । इसकी भरण दर 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक या समान वॉल्यूम की बारंबारता के साथ 30 फिल्स प्रति घंटा ( अधिकतम ) है जो उत्पाद की प्रकृति और मात्रा पर निर्भर है । मशीन को सभी प्रकार विसकॉस/नॉन विसकॉस आयल जैसे मस्टर्ड आयल , जिंगली आयल , सूरजमुखी का तेल आदि के भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
SI -810BF FillingMachine
scaling are:
Este
Sealing wire to be ser
provided hule die 2mm
&
sealing plate&
आकृति- 2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ , कवर और बरास्केट के ऊपर से चार बोरेड स्क्रू में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर कसा गया है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकी । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विव भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे हो मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक क्षमता नाले हैं !
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 295)/2010] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2501 [ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1030. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe Model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument Barrel Filling Machine (Viscous/NonViscous Liquid) belonging to Accuracy Class X(x ) where x = l of 'SI - 810 BF ' series with brand " ESSAE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Essae Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22, 6th Cross , Wilson Garden , Bangalore - 560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/493 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument . Barrel Filling Machine (Viscous /Non Viscous Liquid) . The machine can fill in the range from 50kg to 5000kg or equivalent volume with a frequency of weighing 30 fills per hour (max ) depending upon the quantity and nature of the product . The machine is designed for filling all types of viscous and non viscous oils like mustard oil , Gingili oil , Sunflower oil , etc , The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1 Model
SI -810BF Filling Machine
sealing area
0
Sealing wire to be insert provided hule dis 2mm In fonsi & Tie with sealing plase & seal .
Figure-2-Sealing Diagram of sealing provision of the model .
On the rear side of the indicator, a leaded sealing wire is fastened through four bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator cannot be opened without tampering the seal .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacity ranging from 50kg to 5000kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F.No. WM-21 (295)/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 2502
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2011 / PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1031.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि. , नं. -377/22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन , बंगलौर -560027 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसआई -810 एचटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टैंक वेइंग टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ईएसएसएई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /10/494 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टैंक वेइंग टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
SI - 810HT Tank Weighing
SIDE VIEW
FRONT VIEW
SEALING CREW
VIEW THROUGH A
आकृति-2- मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
प्राधिकारी द्वारा सत्यापन और स्टाम्पिंग के पश्चात इंडीकेटर के पीछे बने होल में से लीडिड वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गधा है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) संहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (295 ) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2503 [ भाग Ii-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1031. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - autematic weighing instrument ( Tank Weighing type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " SI - 810 HT " and with brand narne " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M /s . Essae Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22 , 6th Cross. Wiison Garden , Bangalore - 560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/494 ;
The said model is a load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Tank Weighing type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1 Model
Si -810HT Tank Weighing
ΕΒΩΝΙΕ
SEALING
SEALING
VIEW THROUGH A
Figure -2--Sealing Diagram of the sealing provision ofthe model .
The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes made in the back side of the indicator after verification and stamping by the authorities . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacities in the range of 50kg to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k , or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .
[ F.No. WM -21 (295)/2010]
B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 2504
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2011 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1032.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 6 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए पैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि., नं. -377/ 22, छठा क्रास , दिरासन गार्डन, बंगलौर -56002 ! द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "एसआई-810 एसटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टैंक बेइंग टाइप ) क मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ईएसएमई" है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्च्चात् उदत मॉडल कड़ा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/495 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मोडल एक धिकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टैंक वेइंग टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन भापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है। इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेगतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्त्वावर्ती थारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
SI -810ST Tank Weighing
SIDE VIEW
FRONT VIEW
SEALING SCREW
SEALING SCREW
VIEW THROUGH "A"
आकृति--2--मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
प्राधिकारी द्वारा सत्यापन और स्टाम्पिंग के पश्चात इंडीकेटर के पीछे बने होल में से लीडिड वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5000 कि.ग्रा. से 50000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10* या 5x10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 295 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2505 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1032. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Tank Weighing type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " SI - 810 ST " andwith brand name " ESSAE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufacturedby M/s . Essae Teraoka Limited, No. 377/22 , 6th Cross, Wilson Garden , Bangalore-560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/495 ;
The said model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tank Weighing type ) with a maximum capacity of 30000kg and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 10kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1 Model
SI - 810ST Tank Weighing
EPONT VIEW
SIDEVIEW
SEALING SCREW
SEALING
VIEW THROUGH
Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .
The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes made in the back side of the indicator after verification and stamping by the authorities . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacities in the range of 5000kg to 50000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100g or more and with ' e' value of 1x10k , 2x10 % , or 5x10 *, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .
[ F.No. WM - 21 ( 295 )/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2506
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2011 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1033.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि. , नं. -377 /22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन, बंगलौर -560027 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसआई-810 एमडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म वेइंग मशीन मिल्क व्हीअर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ईएसएसएई " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/496 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म वेइंग मशीन मिल्क व्हीअर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण को कंप्यूटर प्रिंटर, की-बोर्ड और अन्य पेरिफिल्स के साथ किलोग्राम अथवा लीटर में वॉल्यूम दर्शाने के लिए इंटरफेस किया जा सकता है ।
SI - 810MW Milk Weighing Series
50 వరం
"A"
SIDE VIEW
FRONT VIEW
आकृति- 2-मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान
डिस्पले की बाडी से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सील किया जाता है । सील को डिस्पले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से जोड़ा गया है , उसके बाद इन दो छेदों में भीन्न वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 295 ) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2507 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1033.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Weighing Machine- Milk Weigher ) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series " SI - 810 MW " and with brand name " ESSAE" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufactured byM/s . Essae Teraoka Limited , No. 377/22 , 6th Cross , Wilson Garden , Bangalore -560027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/ 496;
The said model is a strain gange type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Weighing Machine-Milk Weigher ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of4kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply. The instrument can be inter faced with computer, printer, Key board and other peripherals to indicate the weight in Kg or volume inlitre.
Figure- 1 Model
SI - 810MW Milk Weighing Series
SIDE VIEW
FRONT VIEW
ப
Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board 10 disable access to external calibration .
Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k, or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .
[F.No. WM -21 (295)/2010]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 686 Gi/2012-4 2508
[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1034.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी नीदरलैंड मीटिनस्टिटूट ( एन एम आई ) , नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी माडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) और उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एंड्रेस हौज़र फ्लोटेक ए जी , केजेनट्रेसे 7 , सी एच 4153 , रीअनाच , स्विटजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 0.3 ( एलपीजी के लिए ) वाले " एलपीजीमास " श्रृंखला के मेजरमेंट ट्रांसड्यूसर ( कोरिओलिस मीटर ) जिसे मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में प्रयोग होता है जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एंड्रेस हौज़र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे भारत में मैसर्स एंड्रेस एंड हौज़र इंडिया प्रा.लि. राज प्लाजा , 5वां तल , ए एंड बी विंग , एल बी एस मार्ग , विखरोली- वेस्ट, मुंबई -400083 द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13 / 10/358 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक मेजरमेंट ट्रांसड्यूसर ( कोरिओलिस मीटर ) , जिसे मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में प्रयोग किया जाता है , जिसका उपयोग तेल और तेल उत्पान , रसायन , पेय तरल पदार्थ , दबाव युक्त तरल गैस जो 400 से 1400 kg/ m³ के बीच के घनत्व में है । उपकरण 20-28 वी ए सी 10 वी से 36 वीं विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है मॉडल की विशेषताएं निम्न प्रकार हैं :-
(1 ) When measuring under pressure liquefied gases (Accuracy Class 1 )
DN8
8 Diameter in
&outlet[mm]
36 Qmax[m³ /h]
9.8 Qmin[m³/h]
2 MMQ sensor [kg ]
DN40 DN15
DN25
25
40 15
600 130
320
3
2.4
6 5
20
50
(II ) Whenmeasuring oil and oil products , chemicals portable liquids (Accuracy Class 0.3 )
DN8
8 Diameter in
&outlet[mm]
36 Qmax[m³/h]
0.8 Qmin[m³/h]
2 MMQ sensor [kg]
DN15
DN25
DN40
25
15
40
130
320
600
3
2.4
6
20
50 5
आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्केल की बॉडी के छेदों में से सीलिंग कायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 72 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2509
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1034. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority along with the Model approval certificate issued by the NMI Netherlands , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub- sections (7 ) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model ofmeasurement transducer ( Coriolis Meter), intended to be used as a part of the Measuring instrument of accuracy class 0.3; (for LPG) and of series " LPGMASS" and brand ' ENDRESS+ HAUSER' (hereinafter referred to as the model ), manufactured by M/ s Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG, Kagentrasse 7 , CH -4153 Reinach , Switzerland and marketed in India by M/ s Endress And Hauser India Pvt Ltd, Raj Plaza , 5th Floor, A &B Wing, LBS Marg , Vikhroli- West , Mumbai 400083 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13/ 10/358 ;.
The said model is a measurement transducer (Coriolis Meter ) , intended to be used as a part of the Measuring instrument used for measurement ofOil and Oil products , chemicals. potable Liquids and under pressure liquefied gases of densities between 400 to 1400kg/m³ .The instrument operates on 20-28V AC/ 10V to 36V DC power supply. The characteristics of the models are as follows:
(1 ) When measuring under pressure liquefied gases (Accuracy Class I )
DN8
8 Diameter in &outlet [mrn]
36 Qmax[m³/h]
0.8 Qmin[ m³/h]
2 MMQ sensor [kg ]
DN40
DN25
DN15
40
25
15
600
320
130
6
3
2.4
50
20
5
(II ) When measuring oil and oil products , chemicals portable liquids (Accuracy Class 0.3 )
DN8
8 Diameter in
& outlet[mm]
36 Qmax[m³/h]
0.8
Qmin[m³/h]
2 MMQ sensor [kg ]
DN40
DN25
DN15
40
25
15
600
320
130
6
3
2.4
50
20
5
Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of se aling provision of the model is given above .
[F. No. WM-21 (72)/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2510
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1035.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी नीदरलैंड मीटिनस्टिटूट ( एन एम आई ) , नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी माडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) और उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एंड्रेस हौज़र फ्लोटेक ए जी , केजेनट्रेसे 7 , सी एच 4153 , रीअनाच , स्विटजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित " सीएनजीमास " श्रृंखला के मेजरमेंट ट्रांसड्यूसर ( कोरिओलिस मीटर ) जिसे इंवायरमेंटल वर्ग सी मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में प्रयोग होता है जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एंड्रेस हौज़र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे भारत में मैसर्स एंड्रेस एंड हौज़र इंडिया प्रा. लि. राज प्लाजा , 5वां तल , ए एंड बी विंग , एल बी एस मार्ग , विखरोली- वेस्ट, मुंबई-400083 द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13 / 10/359 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक मेजरमेंट ट्रांसड्यूसर ( कोरिओलिस मीटर ) , जिसे इंवायरमेंट मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में प्रयोग किया जाता है, जिसका उपयोग प्राकृतिक गैस दबाव ( सी एन जी ) के लिए होता है । उपकरण 20-28 वी ए सी 10 वी से 36 वी विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । मशीन का' के' फैक्टर 1000 पल्सिज/कि.ग्रा. है । मॉडल की विशेषताएं निम्न प्रकार हैं :-
DN8
DN15
DN25
30
80
150
Qmax[m³ /h]
0.3
0.8
0.5
Qmin [m³/h ]
1
1
1
MMQ sensor [ kg]
आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्केल की बॉडी के छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 72 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2511 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1035. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority along with the Model approval certificate issued by the NMI Netherlands , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore; in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub-sections (7) and (8) ofsection 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model ofmeasurement transducer (Coriolis Meter) , intended to be used as a part of the Measuring instrument of environmental class Cwith series " CNGMASS " and , brand ' ENDRESS + HAUSER ' ( hereinafter referred to as the model) , manufactured by M/s . Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG, Kagentrasse 7 , CH - 4153 Reinach, Switzerland and marketed in India by M's .Endress And Hauser India Pvt Ltd, Raj Plaza , 5th Floor, A & B Wing, LBS Marg, Vikhroli -West, Mumbai -400083 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13/ 10/359;
The said model is a measurement transducer ( Coriolis Meter) , intended to be used as a part of the Measuring instrument used for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) . The instrument operates on 20-28VAC/ 10 V to 36V DC power supply . The k factor of the machine is 1000 pulses/kg . The characteristics of the models are as follows:
DN25
DN8
DNI 5
150
30
80
Qmax [ n³/h]
1.5
0.8
0.3
Qmin [m³/h]
1
1
1
MMQ sensor [ kg]
Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
[F. No. WM -21 (72)/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17, 2012 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2512
नई दिल्ली . 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का.आ. 1036.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी नीदरलैंड भीटिनस्टिटूट ( एन एम आई ) , नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी माडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) और उप-धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एंड्रेस हौसर फ्लोटेक ए जी, केजेनट्रेसे 7 , सीं एव -4153 , रीअनाव, स्विजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित "सीएनलोगास डीसीआई " श्रृंखला के भेजरमेट ट्रांसड्यूसर ( कोरिऑलिस मोटर ) जिसे इंदायरमेंटल वर्ग सी मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में प्रयोग होता है जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एंड्रेस हाज़र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे भारत में मैसर्स एंड्रेस एंड डोजर इंडिया प्रा. लि. राज प्लाजा , ऽवां जल, ए एंड बी विंग , एल बी एस मार्ग , विखरोली सेस्ट, मुंबई-400083 द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिले अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन हो/13/10/160 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन ग्रम्पण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मांडल एक मेजरमेंट ट्रांसड्यूसर ( कोरिओलिस मीटर ) , जिसे इंवायरमेंट मापमान उपकरण के फर्ट के रूप में प्रयोग किया जाता है. जिसका उपयोग प्राकृतिक गैस दयाद (भी एन जी ) के लिए होता है । उपकरण 20-28 वी ए सी 10 वी से 36 वी विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता नका' हे' फैक्टर 1000 पल्सिल, कि.ग्रा. है । मॉडल की विशेषताएं निम्न प्रकार हैं
PN25
BN15
DINE
20
150
30
Qmax [ m /h ]
1.5
0.3
0.8
Qmin [m³/h]
1
1
MMQ sensor [ kg ]
LAEL
63.512
आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्केल की बॉडी के छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 72 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2513 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1036. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority along with the Model approval certificate issued by the NMI Netherlands , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues aqd publishes the certificate of approval of model of measurement transducer ( Coriqlis Meter) , intended to be used as a part of the Measuring instrument of environmental class C with series " CNGMASS DCI " and brand ' ENDRESS + HAUSER ' ( hereinafter referred to as the model ) , manufactured byM/ s . Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG, Kagen.trasse 7, CH -4153 Reinach , Switzerland and marketed in India by M /s . Endress And Hauser India Pvt . Ltd. , Raj Plaza, 5th Floor, A and B Wing, LBS Marg , Vikhroli - West , Mumbai -400083 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13/10/360;
The said model is a measurement transducer ( Coriolis Meter) , intended to be used as a part of the Measuring instrument used for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) . The instrument operates on 20-28VAC/ 10V to 36V DC power supply. The k factor of the machine is 1000 pulses/kg . The characteristics of the models are as follows :
DN8
DN15
DN25
30
Qmax [m³/h]
80
150
0.3
0.8
1.5
Qmin [m³/h]
1
1
MMIQ sensor [ kg ]
Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model
Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram sealing provision of the model is given above .
[F. No. WM -21 ( 72)/2010]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2514
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1037.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी नीदरलैंड मीटिनस्टिटूट ( एन एम आई ) , नीदरलैंड द्वारा जारी माडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
एक्स अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) और उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एंड्रेस हौज़र फ्लोटेक ए जी, केजेनट्रेसे 7 , सी एच 4153 , रीअनच , स्विजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 0.3 और यथार्थता वर्ग 1.0 ( प्रोमॉस ई के लिए, प्रेशर लिक्विफाइड गैस के तहत मापने के लिए ) वाले " प्रोमास 84'डीएन " श्रृंखला के मासफ्लो मीटर ( कोरिओलिस सैंसर ) जिसे मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में प्रयोग होता है जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एंड्रेस + हौजर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे भारत में मैसर्स एंड्रेस एंड हौज़र इंडिया प्रा. लि. राज प्लाजा , 5 वां तल , ए एंड बी विंग , एल बी एस मार्ग , विखरोली- वेस्ट, मुंबई -400083 द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13/ 11 / 24 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है !
उक्त मॉडल एक मासफ्लो मीटर ( कोरिओलिस सैंसर ) , जिसे मापमान उपकरण के पार्ट के रूप में पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों के लिए प्रयोग किया जाता है, जिसका उपयोग तेल और तेल उत्पान , रसायन , पेय तरल पदार्थ, दबाव युक्त तरल गैस जो 400 से 1400 kg/ m' के बीच के घनत्व में है । परीक्षण ओ आई एम एल , आर 117-1 के अनुसार किया जाता है । इसके आस- पास की तापमान रेंज -40 ° सें. + 50 ° सें है ।
आकृति-1
Essential Characteristics :
Maximum Pressure : 100 bar(g )
Promass F Sensors
DN15
DN8
100
30
Qmax [ kg/min]
5
1.5
Qmin[kg/min]
5
2
MMQ sensor [ kg ]
DN100
Qmax[t/h]
270 12
Qmin[ t/h]
200
MMQ sensor[ kg ]
Promass A Sensors
DN2
2
0.1
0.05
Qmax( kg/min] Qmin[kg/min] MMQ sensor [kg ]
Promass F Sensors
DN15
DN8
100
30
5
1.5
Qmax[ kg/min ] Qmin[ kg/min]
5
2
MMQ sensor[ kg ]
Promass M Sensors
DN8
Qmax[ kg/ min]
36 0.8
2
Qmin[kg/min] MMQ sensor [kg ]
DN80
DN50
DN40
DN25
1000
3000
700
300
150
35
50
15
200
20
50
20
DN250
DN150
720
15
2200 90 1000
500
DN4
8
0.4
0.2
DN80
DN50
DN40
DN25
3000
1000
700
300
50
150
35
15
200
50
50
20
DN40
DN25
ON15
600
320
130
6
3
2.4
50
20
5
आकृति मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का सीलिंग डायग्राम
मासफ्लो मीटर ( कोरिओलिस सैंसर ) की बाडी के छेदों में सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 72 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2515
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1037.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority along with the Model approval certificate issued by the NMI Netherland , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub section ( 3) and sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of Massflow meter (Coriolis Sensor ) intended to be used as a part of a Measuring System of accuracy class 0.3 and accuracy class 1.0 ( Promass E for measuring under pressure liquefied gases ) of series " Promass84 y DN x " ( where y denotes mechanical variant and x denotes the size of the meter [diameter of the in and outlet in mm] and brand ' ENDRESS + HAUSER ' ( hereinafter referred to as the model ) . manufactured by M/ sEndress + Hauser Flowtec AG Kagentrasse 7, CH - 4153 Reinach , Switzerland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s Endress And Hauser India Pvt Ltd, Raj Plaza, 5th Floor , A and B Wing . LBS Marg, Vikhroli - West . Mumbai -400083 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 / 11/24;
The said model is a Massflow meter ( Coriolis Sensor ) which is part of the " Measuring System for liquids other than water " used for measurement of oil and oil products, chemicals , potable liquids of densities between 400 and 1400 kg/ m3 . The test has been conducted according to OIML R117-1.Its ambient temperature range is -40 ° C/ + 55 °C .
Essential Characteristics :
Maximum Pressure : 100 bar( g)
Promass F Sensors
DN8
DN15
30
100 Qmax[ kg/min ]
1.5
5
5
2
Qmin[kg/min] MMQ sensor[ kg ]
DN100
270
Qmax[ /h]
12
Qmin[ t/h]
200
MMQ sensor [ kg ]
Promass A Sensors
DN2
2
Qmax [ kg/min]
0.1
Qmin[kg/min]
0.05
MMQ serisor [ kg ]
Promass M Sensors
DN15
DN8
30
100 Qmax [kg/min]
1.5
5 Qmin[kg/min]
2
5 MMQ sensor[ kg ]
Promass E Sensors
DN8
36
Qmax[ kg/min}
0.8
Qmin[ kg/min]
2
MMQ sensor [ kg ]
DN25
DN40
DN50
DN80
300
700
1000
3000
15
35
50
150
20
50
20
200
DN150
DN250
720
2200
15
90
500
1000
DN4
8
0.4
0.2
DN25
DN40
DN50
DN80
700
300
1000
3000
15
35
50
150
20
50
50
200
DN15
DN25
DN40
600 130
320
2.4
3
6
20
50 .5
Figure- 1
AAA
Figure- 2 Sealing Diagram
Sealing is done by passing the sealineg wire from the body of the massflow meter (coriolis sensor ) through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
686 G1 /2012-5
[ F. No. WM -21 (72 )/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2516
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1038.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सुमोजय इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स प्रा. लि. , बी/ 18 / 1 , गायत्री इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , भिक्षुक गरूह रोड, सेंट्रल वर्कशाप के सामने , ओडव -382415 अहमदाबाद ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसईसीएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सुमोजय " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/573 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति
CreneScale
METAL BODY
SEALWIRE
MS HUCK
STAMPING
PLATE
0000
SEAL
max-5000 kg min -20 kg e 1kg class - III
SEAL làng mìn 20 kg 3kg claas in
Sumo jay
MS HUCK
आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्केल की बॉडी के होल्स में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 30 टन तक की अधिकतम श्रमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2 × 10 % , 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 339 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2517 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1038. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane Type) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " SECS" and with brand name " SUMOJAY " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sunojay Electronics Pvt . Ltd. , B/ 18/ 1 , Gayatri Ind Estate , Bhikshuk Gruh Road, Opp . Central Workshop, Odhav- 382415 , Ahmedabad (Gujarat ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 10/ 573 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane type) with a maximum capacity of 5000 kg and minimum capacity of20 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 1 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
Figure- 1:Model
CreneScale
SEALWIRE
METAL BODY
MS HUCK
STAMPING PLATE
0000
SEAL
max- 5000 kg min -20 kg e 1kg class -t !!
→SEAL max - 5000 kg min -20 kg e 1kg class -IH !
Sumo jay
MS HUCK
Figure-2: Sealing arrangement
Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the indicator through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . Adip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - rule ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity 50 kg and upto 30 tonne with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interva (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM -21 (339)/2010]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2518
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1039.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सुमोजय इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स प्रा. लि. , बी/ 18 / 1 , गायत्री इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, भिक्षुक गरूह रोड , सेंट्रल वर्कशाप के सामने , ओडव -382415 अहमदाबाद ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसईपीएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सुमोजय " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /10/ 574 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणारः उपदर्शित करता है ।
आकृति-1
0001
Max-150kg , Min-400g, e20g Class- III
GOUARE
आकृति-2 : मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
स्केल के अपर और लोवर माउंटिंग कार्नर पर सीलिंग वायर और स्टड से सीलिंग की गई है । मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की गई है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गयाहै ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* , 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 339 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2519 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1039.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Person Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) ofseries "SEPS" and with brand name " SUMOJAY " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s Sumojay Electronics Pvt . Ltd. , B/ 18/ 1 , Gayatri ind Estate , Bhikshuk Gruh Road , Opp . Central Workshop , Odhav - 382415 , Ahınedabad (Gujarat) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/574.
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Person Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and minimum capacity of400 g . The verification scaie interval ( e) is 20 g . The LED display indicates the weighing results.
Figure- 1 : Model
STOR
Max-150kg ,
Min-400g ,
000
e20g
Class- III
LEAD SUUART SEA
0000
Figure-2: Sealing provision of the indicator of model
The scale is being sealed by the sealing wire and stud from the upper and lower mounting corner . Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 200kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5 g or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manulfactured.
[F. No. WM -21 ( 339 )/ 2010]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2520
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1040.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स गोरेपेन लैबोरेट्रिज लि. , 508 , अंतरिक्ष भवन, 22 , के. जी. मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डीएस-07 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डा. मोरेपेन वेट एंड त्राच " है ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/ 501 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल स्प्रिंग सिद्धांत पर आधारित मैकेनीकल अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( भैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 0.5 कि.ग्रा. है ।
आकृति-1
ㅁㅇ
Positionf Security Sens
8
Placefine
आकृति-2: माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का डायग्राम
उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जाती है । कपटपूर्ण उपयोग को रोकने के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 150 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 302) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2521 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1040. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Person Weighing Machine ) ofOrdinary accuracy ( Accuracy class - IIII ) of series " DS 07 " and with brand name " Dr. Morepen Weight & Watch" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 508 , Antriksh Bhawan, 22, K.G Marg, New Delhi - 110001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/501 ;
The said model is the principal of spring based non- automatic weighing instrument (Mechanical Person Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 120 kg . and minimum capacity of5 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 0.5 kg.
Figure- 1: Model
Position fo SecuritySexs
8
Place
Figure- 2: Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body ofthe instruments. Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 150 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM -21 (302 )/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2522
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का.आ. 1041.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स मोरेपेन लैबोरेट्रिज लि. , 508 , अंतरिक्ष भवन , 22 , के. जी. मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110001 द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग IIII ) वाले " एमएस " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डा. मोरेपेन वेट एंड वाच " है ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/ 502 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल स्प्रिंग सिद्धांत पर आधारित मैकेनिकल अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 130 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 कि.ग्रा. है ।
आकृति-1
आकृति-2 माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का डायग्राम
उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जाती है । कपटपूर्ण उपयोग को रोकने के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 150 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 302) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2523 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1041. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Mechanical Person Weighing Machine) of Ordinary accuracy ( Accuracy class - IIII ) of series " MS " and with brand name " Dr. Morepen Weight & Watch " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Morepen Laboratories Ltd. , 508, Antriksh Bhawan, 22, K.G Marg, New Delhi- 110001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/502 .
The said model is the principal of spring based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Mechanical Person Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 130 kg . and minimum capacity of 10 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1 kg .
Figure- 1: Model
مله.
Figure-2: Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instruments . Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 150 kg . with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 (302 )/2010]
B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 636 G1/2012-6 2524
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27, 1933
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का.आ. 1042. केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स वेंकेटेश्वर देइंग सर्विसिज , नं. 445 , लोहा आयल इतवारी , नागपुर -440002 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " वीडब्ल्यू- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तुला " है ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/532 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति-1
Secmisite
आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10*, 5× 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 294) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2525 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1042. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy Class - II ) of series " VW- II " and with brand name " TULA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Venkateswara Weighing Services , No 445, Loha Oli Itwari , Nagpur- 440002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10 /532 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with amaximum capacity of20 kg. and niinimum capacity of50 g. The verifiction scale interval (e ) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure-1
Secondsite7
TULA
1
Services Nagpur
TULA
Figure- 2: Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connectedby whole in base plate & top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range 100 to 100,000 or ' e ' value of Img . to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the of 5000 to 100,000 for `e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 (294) /2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2526
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
:
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1043.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स वेंकटेश्वर वेइंग सर्विसिज , नं. 445 , लोहा आयल इतवारी , नागपुर -440002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता भर्ग III ) वाले " वीडब्ल्यू-03 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तुला " है ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/533 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 2:0 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति
TULA
Seshing
S.PLAT
wara Weighing
-ZERO
आकृति-2: माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 294) /2010]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान {भाग II ---खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2527 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1043. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of medium Accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of series " VW-03 " and with brand name " TULA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Venkateswara Weighing Services , No.445 , Loha Oli Itwari , Nagpur -440002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/533 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verifiction scale interval ( e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
TULA
Seskin
S.PLAT
00000
map plate
ZERO TARE
Figure- 2: Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of Similar make , accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 For ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' 1 × 10k , 2 × 10* or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 (294)/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 2528
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 / PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )]
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1044.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स वेंकेटेश्वर वेइंग सर्विसिज, नं. 445 , लोहा आयल इतवारी , नागपुर -440002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " वीडब्ल्यूपी -03 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तुला " है (जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/ 534 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति-1
PLATFORM
side sealing
ULA
HEAD
9
Starting Plat
sidescaliny
LIGHING PLAT
आकृति-2 : माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 294) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2529 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1044.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (ApprovalofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of mediumAccuracy (Accuracy Class- III ) of series " VW- P - 03 " and with brand name " TULA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s. Venkateswara Weighing Services , No. 445, Loha Oli Itwari , Nagpur -440002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 534 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verifiction scale interval (e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
PLATFORM LALL
HEAD
Stamping Plat sidescaling
WEIGHING PLAI
Figure- 2 : Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 294)/ 2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 2530
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1045.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और मांप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार; उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स वेंकटेश्वर वेइंग सर्विसिज , नं. 445 , लोहा आयल इतवारी , नागपुर -440002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " वीडब्ल्यूसीआर- III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तुला " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/10 / 535 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति-1
Services
TULA
Max. Mini
30Kg 100 m.
ZERO
आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 500 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2 × 10* , 5 × 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[.फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (294 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2531 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1045. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Hanging Scale ) with digital indication of medium Accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) of series " VW- CR- III " and with brand name " TULA" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Venkateswara Weighing Services , No 445, Loha Oli Itwari , Nagpur -440002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/535 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Hanging Scale) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verifiction scale interval ( e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
Figure- 1
NG.PLATE
TULA Class
1AHE
ZERO
Figure- 2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration . Adip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 500 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 2g. and verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM-21 (294) /2010]
B. N. DIXIT , Director ofLegal Metrology 686 G1 /2012-7 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2532
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2011
का.आ. 1046.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स मॉडर्न स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , # 9 और 10 , कन्नूसामी गोंदार स्ट्रीट, संकनूर मैन रोड, राथनापुरी , कोयम्बतूर -641027 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एमएसजे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माडर्न " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/468 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति-1
MODERN MSI
GEALING POINT
आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्प्ले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है, तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है !
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किः उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही येऊ, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जां । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 510 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पृर्णांक या शून्य क समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. रां. क्यू एम-21 ( 281 ) /2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2533 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1046. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy Class - II ) of series " MSJ " and with brand name " MODERN" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/ s . Modern Scale Industries , # 9 & 10 , Kannusamy Gowndar Street , Sankanoor Main Road , Rathnapuri , Coimbatore - 641027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /10/463 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load ceil based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verifiction scale interval (e ) is 2 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
MODERN MSI
SEALING POINT
Figure- 2: Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display , then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.
The instrument has external control to calibration .A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . a with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e' value of 1mg . to 50 mg . and verification scale interval ( n) in the range of5000 to 10,0000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manulfactured.
[ F. No. WM -21 (281 ) /2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 2534
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का.आ. 1047.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मॉडर्न स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , # 9. और 10 , कन्नूसामी गोंदार स्ट्रीट , संकनूर मैन रोड , राथनापुरी , कोयम्बतूर-641027 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एमएसटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " माडर्न " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/469 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है' । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति-1
000
ت
SEALING POINT MODERN - MST
आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्पले की बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है , तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10 * , 5× 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 281 )/2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2535 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011
S.O. 1047. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights of Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurest (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of series " MST " and with brand name "MODERN" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Modern Scale Industries , # 9 & 10, KannusamyGowndar Street , Sankanoor Main Road , Rathnapuri , Coimbatore -641027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 10/469 .
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verifiction scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing resu't The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
Figure- i
SEALING POINT
MONERN - MST
Figure- 2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Theinstrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 2 g. and verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 281 )/2010]
B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 2536
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011
का. आ. 1043.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मेसर्स मॉडर्न स्केल इंडस्ट्रिज 9 और 10 , कन्नूसार्मः गोंदार स्ट्रीट , संकनूर मैन रोड , राधनापुरी , कोयम्बतूर -641027 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( अथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एमएसपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गाडर्न " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/10/470 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रभाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार खेल आधारित अरवचालित तोलः। उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत-प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 30 तोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
आकृति-1
sealing point
Stamping Plate
आकृति-2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्प्ले की बेस प्लेट और टाप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है, तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 % , 5× 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 281 )/2010 ]
बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2537 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011
S.O. 1048.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " MSP " and with brand name " MODERN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Modern Scale Industries , # 9 & 10 , Kannusainy Gowndar Street, Sankanoor Main Road, Rathnapuri , Coimbatore -641027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/470;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Figure- 1
sealing point
Stamping Plate
Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model
Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
The instrument has external control to calibration .A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of the same series with maximum capacity above 50kg up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g of more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM-21 (281 )/2010 ]
B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2538
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1049.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
संख्या
4
3
2
1
2011/03/16
3471761
1.
भा मा सं. ( भाग/अनुभाग ) वर्ष
6
5
IS 8418: 1999 पंप अपकेन्द्रीय स्वतः
प्रायमिंग
मैसर्स मही इंजीनियरिंग ( प्रा. ) लिमिटेड , यूनिट-11 सं. 282/2 , कालापट्टी रोड , कोयम्बत्तूर - 641048
2011/03/17
2. 3471256
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स जे के बी एस फुड्स द. सं. 9/387 , पनन्गुरै तोट्टम पेरुर- चेट्टीयालयम , कोयम्बतूर -641010 सिरुवाणि मुख्य रोड, कालमपालयम पोस्ट,
2011/03/17
3471559
3.
IS 8034: 2002 निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स अम्मन इंजीनियरिंग सं. 154/17 , कुलतुपुन्जै सड़क, आर.के. आर. नगर , धारापुरम तालुक , ईरोड - 638656
2011/03/18
3473765
4.
IS 4985: 2000 पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए अप्लास्टिकृत पी वी सा पारप
मैसर्स श्री अम्मन पॉलीमर्स प्रायवेट लिमिटेड एस एफ 16 कलंगल गॉव रोड, सुलूर कोयम्बतूर-641402
3476569
2011/03/28
5.
IS 8034: 2002 निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स शार्प इंडस्ट्रीज एस एफ सं. 801/1 - A , सिद्रा रोड कालापट्टी , कोयम्बतूर- 641035
2011/03/28
3476468
6.
IS 14220: 1994
गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स शार्प इंडस्ट्रीज एस एफ सं. 801/1 - A , सिट्रा रोड कालापट्टी, कोयम्बतूर - 641035
3477470
7.
2011/03/28
IS 8472: 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरुत्पादक पंप
मैसर्स स्टार्क मोटर्स सं. 96 , सिट्रा रोड, कालापट्टी पोस्ट, कोयम्बतूर - 641035
8.
2011/03/28
3477268
IS 8034: 2002 मिथंज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स अग्री पम्प इंडस्ट्रीस 472, मणियकरमपालयम रोड , नल्लमपालयम , कोयम्बतूर -641006
2011/03/28
9. 3477369
IS 9283: 1995 निमज्जनीय पंप सेट के लिए मोटर
मैसर्स अग्री पम्प इंडस्ट्रीस
472, मणियकरमपालयम रोड,
नल्लमपालयम, कोयम्बतूर -641006
2011/03/29
10. 3477874
IS 4985: 2000 निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स टार्क इंजीनियर्स सं. 59 , अरलामरम , तीसरा सडक, गणपति पोस्ट, आवारमपालयम, कोयम्बत्तूर - 641006 2539
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
2011/03/29
11. 3477773
(5)
(6)
IS 8034: 2002 निमज्जनीय पंप सेट के लिए मोटर
मैसर्स टार्क इंजीनियर्स सं. 59 , अरसामरम , तीसरा सडक , गणपति पोस्ट, आवारमपालयम , कोयम्बत्तूर -641006
2011/03/30
12. 3478775
IS 14220 : 1994 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स विजयलक्ष्मी मिनरल्स 16/3 , अस्पताल सडक , पेरूर मुख्य रोड, मदुक्करै ब्लॉक , सुन्डक्कामुतुर , कोयम्बत्तूर-641010
2011/03/31
13. 3480964
IS 8472: 1998 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स वी एस जे मिनरल्स एस एफ सं. 264/4 , सिरुवाणि मुख्य रोड , मादमपट्टी , कोयम्बत्तूर-641010
2011/03/31
14. 3479979
पी वी सी रोधित केबिल
IS 694 : 1990
मैसर्सन्यूटेक केबल्स 544/1, चिन्नामड्डमपालयम , बिलिचि पोस्ट, पी.एन. पालयम ब्लॉक, कोयम्बत्तूर-641019
[ संख्या सी एम डी/13: 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1049. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) ofthe regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification)
Regulation , 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particus of which are given in
the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Grant Date Name and Address ( Factory) of the Party
SI Licence No
No.
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
1. 3471761 2011/03/16
Title of the Standard IS No. Part /Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 8418 : 1999 Horizontal Centrifugal Self-Priming pumps
M/ s . Mahee Engineering (P. ) Ltd. Unit - II , No.282/2 Kalapatty Road, Coimbatore- 641048
2. 3471256 2011/03/17
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking Water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/ s . JKBS Foods D. No. 9/387 , Panangurai Thottam, Siruvani Main Road, Kalampalayam (P.O. ) Perur-Chettipalayam, Coimbatore -641010
3. 3471559 2011/03/17
IS 8034: 2002 Submersible Pumpsets
M/s . Amman Engineering No. 154/17 , Kulathupunjai Street, R.K.R. Nagar , Dharapuram (Tk.) , Erode- 638656
4. 3473765 2011/03/18
IS 4985: 2000 UPVC pipes for potable water supplies
M/s . Sri Amman Polymers Private Ltd. SF. No. 16, Kalangal Village Road , Sulur Coimbatore-641402
5. 3476569 2011/03/28
IS 8034: 2002 Submersible Pumpsets
M/ s . Sharp Industries SF No. 801 / 1 -A Sitra Road Kalapatti , Coimbatore - 641035
686 GI/2012-8 2540
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
2011/03/28
6. 3476468
(6)
(5)
Openwell Submersible IS 14220 : 1994 Pumpsets
M/ s. Sharp Industries SF No. 801 / 1 - A Sitra Road Kalapatti , Coimbatore - 641035
7. 3477470 2011/03/28
Centrifugal Regenerative IS 8472 : 1998 Pumps for clear, cold water
M/ s. Stark Motors No. 96 , Sitra Road , Kalappatti Post , Coimbatore- 641035
2011/03/28
8. 3477268
Submersible Pumpsets IS 8034: 2002
M/ s . Agri Pump Industries 472, Maniyakarampalyam Road , Nallampalayam Coimbatore - 641006
2011/03/28
9. 3477369
Motors for Submersible IS 9283 : 1995 Puimpsets
M/ s . Agri Pump Industries 472, Maniyakarampalyam Road , Nallampalayam Coimbatore - 641006
2011/03/29
10. 3477874
Submersible Pumpsets IS 8034: 2002
M/ s. Tark Engineers No. 59 , Arasamaram , 3rd Street Ganapathy (P.O. ) , Avarampalayam , Coimbatore - 641006
2011/03/29
11. 3477773
Motors for Submersible IS 9283 : 1995 Pumpsets
M/s . Tark Engineers No. 59 , Arasamaram , 3rd Street Ganapathy (P.O. ), Avarampalayam , Coimbatore- 641006
2011/03/30
12. 3478775
IS 14543 : 2004
M/ s . Vijayalakshtni Minerals 16/3 , Hospital Street , Perur Main Road Madukarai Block Sundakkamuthur, Coimbatore - 641010
2011/03/31
13. 3480964
Packaged Drinking water( other than packaged Natural Mineral Water)
IS 14543 : 2004
Packaged Drinking water ( other than packaged Natural Mineral Water )
M/s . V S J Minerals SF No: 264/4 , Siruvani Main Road , Madampatti , Coimbatore-641010
14. 3479979 2011/03/31
IS 694 : 1990 PVC Insulated Cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V
M/s . Newtec Cables # 544/ 1 , Chinnamaddampalayam, Bilichi (P.O. ) , P.N. Palayam Block, Coimbatore - 641019
[No. CMD/ 13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1050.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
कम संख्या
4 2
3
1
1 . 3481259
2011/04/04
भा मा सं. ( भाग/अनुभाग ): वर्ष
6
5
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मैसर्स मारुति डिस्टिलर्स प्रायवेट लिमिटेड , 18/380 , कोन्गु नगर, मुतूर रोड, वेल्लाकोविल , तिरुप्पुर - 638111 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2541
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2
3
4
2. 3481057
2011/04/04
5
6
अपकेन्द्रीय जेट पम्प
IS 12225 : 1997
मैसर्स यूनिडैनामिक वेक्क्यूम पम्प्स (इंडिया) प्रायवेट लिमिटेड सं. 20 , धनलक्ष्मी नगर एक्स्टेन्शन , मसकालीपालयम रोड, उप्पिलीपालयम पोस्ट, कोयम्बत्तूर-641015
3. 3490462
2011/04/26
IS 14543: 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स समुद्रा मिनरल आर एस एफ 723/2 , 724/2 , पालया तोट्टम , भवानी ब्लॉक, मून रोड , वरतनल्लूर पोस्ट, भवानी तालुक , ईरोड -638311
4. 3490361
2011/04/26
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स भवानी मिनरल वाटर एस एफ 224/1 बी, जोसियार पिरिवु , वेल्लियन्गाडु पोस्ट, कारामडै ( के रास्ते) मेट्टुपालयम तालुक, कोयम्बत्तूर -641104
5. 3493165
2011/04/27
IS 8472 : 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरुत्पादक पंप्स
मैसर्स एशियन इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीस एस एफ सं. 508 , पी.एस.जी. एस्टेट कालोनी , पीलमेडु, कोयम्बत्तूर - 641004
[संख्या सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1050.-In pursuance of sub -regulation ( 5) ofthe regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation, 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
Grant Date
Sl . Licence No.
Title of the Standard
Name and address ( factory) of the party
No.
( 1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 .
3481259
2011/04/04
IS No. Part /Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 14543 : 2004
M/s. Maaruthi Distilers Private Limited 18/380, Kongu Nagar , Muthur Road , Vellakovil , Tiruppur-638111
2. 3481057 2011/04/04
Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
IS 12225 : 1997 Centrifugal Jet Pumps
M/s . Unidynamic Vacuum Pumps ( India) Private Limited No. 20 , Dhanalakshmi Nagar Extension Masakalipalayam Road, Uppilipalayam Post, Coimbatore - 641015
3. 3490462 2011/04/26
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking Water ( other than Packaged Natural MineralWater)
M/ s . Samudra Minaral RSF 723/2 , 724/2 , Palaya Thottam, Bhavani Block , Moon Road, Varadhanallur P.O. , Bhavani Taluk , Erode - 638311 2542
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
(4)
(2)
(3)
(1)
2011/04/26 M/ s . Bavani Mineral Water 4. 3490361
(6)
(5)
IS 14543: 2004
SF 224/ 1B , Josiar Pirivu, Velliyangadu Post, Karamadai (Via) , Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore - 641104
5. 3493165 2011/04/27
Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
Centrifugal Regenerative IS 8472 : 1998
pumps for clear , cold water
M/s . Asian Engineering Industries SF No. 508 , P.S.G. Estate Colony, Peelamedu , Coimbatore- 641004
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1051.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या संख्या
4 2
3
1
2011/05/10
1. 3498074
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा सं. ( भाग/अनुभाग): वर्ष
6
5
IS 14543: 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स रीवा इंजीनियरिंग 933/4सी, आसारी तोट्टम , वीरैयमपालयम रोड , मैलमपट्टी, कोयम्बतूर - 641062
2011/05/13
2. 3499379
मैसर्स जय शक्ति मिनरल्स 30-ए, एम.एम.एस. नगर , पहला सडक , वलयन्काडु , तिरुप्पुर - 641603
2011/05/23
3. 3501845
IS 12225 : 1997 अपकेन्द्रीय जेट पम्प
IS 14220 : 1994 गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स मेहला मशीन्स इंडिया लिमिटड यूनिट 2 पुराना सं. 5/43 बी, सं. 104,105 , अविनाशि रोड, कनियूर , करुमत्तमपट्टी पोस्ट, कोयम्बतूर - 641659
[संख्या सी एम डी/13: 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1051. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
Licence No Grant Date
Title of the Standard
Name and address (factory) of the party
Sl No.
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
2011/05/10
1. 3498074
M/s . Revaa Engineering 933/4C , Aasari Thottam,
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(6)
(5)
IS 14543 : 2004
Veeriyampalayam Road , Myilampatti
Coimbatore- 641062
Packaged Drinking Water ( other than Packaged Natural MineralWater) 2543
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(4)
(2)
(3)
(1)
M/ s . Jai Shakthi Minerals 2.
2011/05/13
3499379
30-A , M.N.S. Nagar, 1st Street , Valayankadu , Tirupur - 641603
2011/05/23
3501845
3.
(6)
(5)
IS 12225 : 1997
Centrifugal Jet
Pumps
IS 14220 : 1994 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets
M/s. Mehala Machines India Limited Unit II , Old No. 5/43 B, No. 104 ,105 , Avanashi Road , Kaniyur, Karumathampatti (P.O. ), Coimbatore -641659
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1052.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं: -
अनुसूची
भा मा सं./ भाग/खंड/वर्ष भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
संख्या
(4) (2)
(3)
(1)
2011/06/02
3511040
1.
मेसर्स ए सी सी लिमिटेड मदुक्करै सिमेंट वर्क्स, मदुक्करै कोयम्बतूर - 641105
2.
3507857
2011/06/13
(6) (5)
IS 3466 : 1988 मेसनरी सिमेंट
IS 8034: 2002 निमन्जनीय पंप सेट
मेसर्स बी डी आर इंडस्ट्रीज दरवाजा सं. 1 , तन्डालमुतु सड़क , नल्लमपालयम , गणपति पोस्ट, कोयम्बतूर -641006
2011/06/13
3507958
3.
IS 9283 : 1995 निमज्जनीय पंप सेट के
मोटर
मेसर्स बी डी आर इंडस्ट्रीज दरवाजा सं. 1 , तन्डालमुतु सड़क , नल्लमपालयम , गणपति पोस्ट, कोयम्बतूर-641006
4. 3508455
2011/06/13
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मेसर्स ए एस वाटर टेक्नालोजी 29/ए, विनायगर कोइल सडक, जीवा नगर , नवल ले आउट , रतिनपुरी , कोयम्बतूर - 641027
3508253
2011/06/13
5.
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल
( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल केअलावा)
मेसर्स श्री शक्ति मिनरल्स द सं. 80 , आर एस एफ सं. 234/7 , पेरिया तोट्टम , ईरोड- 638107
2011/06/16
3509558
6.
IS 2830 1992 सामान्य संरचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिये कॉबर्न, ढलवाँ इस्पात बिलेट इंगट बिलेट, ब्लूम और स्लैब
मेसर्स जयलक्ष्मी एलॉय्स इंडिया प्रायवेट लिमिटेड एस एफ सं. 190 , कुरिचि न्यू टाउन , एल आई सी कालोनी, सिडको, कोयम्बतूर- 641021
3509659
2011/06/16
7.
मेसर्स नयाग्रा एक्वा फार्म्स नया सं. 46 , ए के एस नगर , तडागम रोड, कोयम्बतूर - 641001
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल
(पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा) 2544
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
(2) (1)
8. 3510543
2011/06/17
(4)
(3)
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मेसर्स विनय एसोसियेट्स 5/75 , नन्दवना तोट्टम, वैयापुरी पुदुर , मदुक्करै , ब्लॉक, पुद्धविकि, पेरूर पोस्ट, कोयम्बतूर -641010
2011/06/21 3512042
9.
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मेसर्स श्री जयराम इंडस्ट्रीज सं. 10/2980, त्रिची रोड , अल्वेर्निया कॉन्वेन्ट के सामने , रामनाथापुरम, कोयम्बतूर - 641045
2011/06/29 10. 3514349
IS 8472: 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरूत्पादक पंप्स
मेसर्स एल्क्ट्रोमेक इंजीनियरिंग सं. 90/2 , इलग्नो नगर , आचारमपालयम , गणपति, कोयम्बतूर - 641006
י
2011/06/29 3513953
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैके जयंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मेसर्स आलियार पेकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर 1'सी ! , करुध्पमपालयम रोड , वैक्कमंतु , पोल्लाची दक्षिण ब्लॉक , जमीन ऊतुकुलो गाँव, पोल्लाची तालुक-642004
[सं. सी एम डी/13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1052.-In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulation , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :---
Licence No. Grant Date SCHEDULE
Title of the Standard
Name and address ( factory) of the party
S1 . No.
(2)
(1)
(3)
2011/06/02 1. 3511040
IS No. Part / Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 3466 : 1988 Masonry Cement
M/ s . ACC Limited Madukkarai Cement Works Madukkarai , Coimbatore - 641105
2. 3507857 2011/06/13
IS 8034 : 2002 Submersible Pumpsets
M/s.BDR Industries Door No. 1 , Thandalmuthu Street, Nallampalayam , Ganapathy (P.O. ) Coimbatore-641006
3. 3507958 2011/06/13
IS 9283 : 1995 Motors for Submersible Pumpsets
M/s. BDR Industries Door No. 1 , Thandalmuthu Street , Nallampalayam , Ganapathy (P.O. ) Coimbatore-641006
4. 3508455 2011/06/13
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineralwater)
M/s . A.S. Water Technology 29/A, Vinayagar Koil Street, Jeeva Nagar, Navalr Layout , Rathinapuri , Coimbatore - 641027
5.
2011/06/13 3508253
IS 14543 : 2004
M/s . Sri Sakthi Minerals D. No. 80 , RSF : 234/7 , Periya Thottam, Erode - 638107
Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineralwater) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2545
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
6. 3509558 2011/06/16
(5)
(6)
2830 : 1992
M/s. Jayalakshmi Alloys India Pvt . Ltd. SF No, 190 , Kurichi New Town , LIC Colony, SIDCO , Coimbatore - 641021
7. 3509659 2011/06/16
Carbon Steel Cast Billet IS Ingots For Re - Rolling into Steel For General Structural Purposes
IS 14543 : 2004
M/ s. Niagara Aqua Farms New No. 46 , A.K. S. Nagar , Thadagam Road, Coimbatore - 641001
8. 3510543 2011/06/17
Packaged Drinking water (other than Packaged Natural MineralWater)
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/ s . Vinay Associates 5/75 , Nandhavana Thottam , Vaiyapurai Pudur, Madukarai Block, Puttuviki , Perur Post , Coimbatore -641010
9. 3512042 2011/06/21
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking water (other than packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/ s . Sri Jayaram Industries No. 10/2980 , Trichy Road, Opp: Alvenia Convent School , Ramanathapuram , Coimbatore-641045
10. 3514349 2011.06/29
8472 : 1998 Centrifugal Regenerative IS puinps for clear, cold water
M/s. Electromec Engineering No. 90/2 , Elango Nagar, Avarampalayam , Ganapathy Coimbatore - 641006
11. 3513953 2011/06/29
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/ s. Aliyar Packaged Drinking Water 1C1 , Karuppampalayam Road, Vaikalmedu , Pollachi (South) Block Zarmin Uthukuli Village , Pollachi Taluk - 642004
[No. CMD/13: 11]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1053. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्त्रीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
(1) ( 2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3519157
2011/07/05
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष
भा मा सं. ( भाग/ अनुभाग )
वर्ष
(5)
(6)
IS 8472 : 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरुत्पादक पंप्स
मेसर्स हैटेक इंजीनियरिंग एस एफ सं. 338/3 सी2 , श्री वेंकटेश्वर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, पीलमेडु , कोयम्बतूर-- 641004
3521043
2011/07/21
IS 8472 : 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरुत्पादक पंप्स
मेसर्स जेस्को इंजीनियरिंग इंडिया प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , सं. 221/1 , सती रोड, सरवनमपट्टी, कोयम्बतूर -641035
3. 3521144
2011/07/22
IS 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मेसर्स श्री वरी एक्वा मिनरल्स सं. 4. प्रियानगर एक्सटेंशन सड़क सं. 596 , कुमारापालयम गाँव , चेरन नर्सिंग कॉलेज के सामने , पेरूर मुख्य रोड, कोयम्बतूर -641039 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2546
(4)
(3)
( 2)
(1)
2011/07/25
4. 3521750
मेसर्स शार्प इंडस्ट्रीज शार्प नगर, कालापट्टी , कोयम्बतूर - 641035
2011/07/28
3522954
5.
(6) (5)
IS 12225 : 1997 अपकेन्द्रीय जेट पंप्स
IS 14543: 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मेसर्स आर वी प्योर ITS 43 , पाचापालयम, तोन्डामुतूर ब्लॉक पेरुर चेट्टीपालयम , कोयम्बतूर -641010
2011/07/28
3524554
6.
IS 12615 : 2004 उर्जा दक्ष प्रेरण मोटरें - तीन फेजी स्कियेरल केज
मेसर्स सुगुणा इंडस्ट्रीज एस एफ सं. 409 , कालापट्टी रोड , कोयम्बतूर-641014
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13: 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi, the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1053.-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars ofwhich are given below in the following schedule :-
SCHEDULE
Title of the Standard
Name and address ( factory) of the Party
Grant Date
Licence No
SI. No.
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
2011/07/05
3519157
1.
IS No. Part /Sec . Year
(6) (5)
IS 8472: 1998 Centrifugal Regenerative pumps for clear, Cold water
M/s . Hiteck Engineering SF No. 338 / 3C2, Sri Venkateswara Industrial Estate , Peelamedu, Coimbatore - 641004
2011/07/21
3521043
2.
IS 8472: 1998 Centrifugal Regenerative pumps for clear, Cold water
M/s. Jesco Engineering India Private Limited, No. 221/1 , Sathy Road, Saravanampatti Coimbatore - 641035
2011/07/22
3521144
3.
IS 14543 : 2004
Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water )
M/ s . Srii Vari Aqua Minerals No. 4, Priyanagar Extension Street , No. 596, Kumarapalayam (Village) Opp. Cheran Nursing College , Perur Main Road , Coimbatore - 641039
2011/07/25
4. 3521750
M/s. Sharp Industries Sharp Nagar, Kalapatti Coimbatore- 641035
2011/07/28
3522954
5.
IS 12225 : 1997
Centrifugal Jet Pumps
IS 14543 : 2004
Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/ s . RV Pure ITS 43 , Pachapalayam , Thondamuthur Block, Perur Chettipalayam, Coimbatore - 641010
2011/07/28
3524554
6.
M/s . Suguna Industries SF No. 409 , Kalapatti Road, Coimbatore - 641014
IS 12615 : 2004 EnergyEfficient Induction Motors- Three Phase Squirrel Cage
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2547
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
नईदिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1054.--भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3530246
2011/08/02
मेसर्स जय लक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रीज सं. 6, दुरैसामी ले आउट , आवारमपालयम, कोयम्बतूर -641006
2. 3535054
2011/08/18
भा मा सं. ( भाग/खंड ) वर्ष
(5)
(6)
IS8472: 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरुत्पादक पंप्स
IS 10805 : 1986
मेसर्स सी.आर.आई. पम्प्स प्राइवेट लि. यूनिट इंजीनियरिंग डिविजन सं. 43 ( 17 ) , आवारमपालयम रोड , गणपति , कोयम्बतूर- 641006
3. 3539062
2011/08/26
कृषि पम्पिंग प्रणाली का चूक्षण लाइनों में प्रयोग किए जाने वाले फुट वाल्व , रिफ्लेक्स वाल्व या नान रिटर्न वाल्व और बोर वाल्व की विशिष्टि
IS 4984 1995 पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्व वाले पॉलीएथिलीन पाइप्स
मेसर्स श्री पवित्रा पाइप प्रोडक्ट्स सं. 27/7 , अन्जुगम नगर ( के रास्ते ) उडयमपालयम , कोयम्बतूर - 641006
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1054. In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given below in the following schedule :-
SCHEDULE
SI .
Grant Date
Licence No
Title of the S
Name and Address (Factory) of the Party
No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 . 3530246 2011/08/02 M/ s. Jai- Laxmi Industries No. 6 Duraisamy Layout , Avarampalayam , Coimbatore- 641006
2. 3535054 2011/08/18
1 IS No. Part/ Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 8472: 1998 Centrifugal Regenerative pumps for clear, cold water
13 10805 : 1986
M/s. C.R.I Pumps Private Limited Unit-Engineering Division No.43 ( 17), Avarampalayam Road , Ganapathy, Coimbatore -641006
3. 3539062 2011/08/26
Foot Valves , reflux valves or non -return valves and bore valves to be used in suction linesof agricultural pumping systems
IS 4984: 1995 High Density Polyethy- lene pipes for water supplies
M/ s. Shri Pavithraa Pipe Products No. 27/7 , Anjugam Nagar (Via) Udayampalayam , Coimbatore- 641006
636 GI/ 2012-9
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F' & Head 2548
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 / PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[ PART II-- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी, 2012
का.आ. 1055.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
1
2
3
4
1. 3553056
2011/10/03
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा सं. ( भाग/अनुभाग) वर्ष
5
6
एस्बेस्टस सिमेंट बिल्डिग 1626 ( भाग 3 )
1994
मेसर्स एवरेस्ट इंडस्ट्रीस लिमिटेड पोदन्तुर वर्क्स , कुरिची गाँव, पोदन्नूर, कोयम्बतूर - 641023
2. 3556264
2011/10/19
पाइप्स एवं पाइप फिटिंग्स गटर्स एवं गटर फिटिंग्स एवं रुफिंग फिटिंग्स भाग 3- रूफिंग फिटिंग्स
996: 2009
एक फेजी छोटी ए.सी. और यूनिवर्सल बिजली के मोटर
मेसर्स के टेक मोटर्स सं. 28 , महालक्ष्मी कोइल स्ट्रीट उप्पिलीपालयम पोस्ट, मसक्कालिपालयम, कोयम्बतूर-641015
[संख्या सी एम डी/13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1055. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulation, 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars ofwhich are given below in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date
Title of the Standard
Name and address ( factory) of the party
SI. No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 . 3553056 2011/11/03
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
1636 : Part 3:
Asbestos Cement
1994
M/s. Everest Industries Limited Podanur Works , Kurichi Village , Podanur , Coimbatore - 641023
2. 3556264 2011/10/19
Building Pipes and PipeFittings , Gutters and Gutter Fittings and Roofings Fittings -Part3 : Roofing Fittings
996:2009 Single- Phase small ac
and universal electric motors
M/ s . K. Tech Motors No. 28 , Mahalakshmi Koil Street , Uppilipalayam (P.O. ) Masakkalipalayam , Coimbatore-641015
[ No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head भाग 11 -----खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2549
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27, 1933
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1056.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
नक्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
2
3
4
3573971
2011/11/25
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
भा मा सं. ( भाग/अनुभाग) वर्ष
5
6
14543 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मेसर्स किरुबा वाटर सिस्टम् 1/840, कोयम्बतूर रोड, सत्यामंगलम ब्लॉक , कूनामूलै गांव सत्यामंगलम तालुक , ईरोड -638402
3571866
2011/11/25
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद 14543 : 2004 मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मेसर्स श्री वेट्रिवेल एक्वाप्रोडक्ट्स एस एफ 132 , पल्लतूर रोड , टी.एन. पालयम ब्लॉत, वाणिपुतुर गाँव, गोबीचेट्टीपालयम तालुक , ईरोड - 638506
[संख्या सी एम डी/ 13: 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1056. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation, 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given low in the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date
Title of the Standard
Name and address ( factory) of the party
(2)
(3)
(4)
3573971
2011/11/25 M/ s. Kiruba Water Systems 1/840, Coimbatore Road , Sathyamangalam Block, Koonamoolai Village , Sathyamangalam Taluk , Erode - 638402
3571866 2011/11/25
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking
Water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking
Packaged Natural
M/ s.Sri Vetrivel Aqua Products SF 132, Pallathur Road , T.N. Palayam Block, Vaniputheer village . Taluk , Erode- 638506 Water( other than Mineral Water)
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head 2550
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1057.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या संख्या
स्वीकृति करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
1. 3577777
2001/12/05
भामा सं. ( भाग/ अनुभाग ) : वर्ष
आईएस 9079 : 2002 कृषि तथा जल आपूर्ति के लिए साफ ठंडे पानी के बिजली के मोनोसेट पम्प्स
मैसर्स श्रीराम एयर कम्प्रेसर्स (कोयम्बटूर ) प्राइवेट लिमिटेड 48 -डी, एस एन आर कॉलेज रोड, नवा इंडिया , कोयम्बत्तूर -641006
2. 3580564
2011/12/14
आईएस 14220 : 1994 गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पंप सैट
मेसर्स पयोनीर प्रोडक्ट्स सं. 4 और 5 , ए.के.जी. नगर , वरदाराजापुरम , उप्पिलीपालयम , कोयम्बत्तूर -641015
3. 3580463
2011/12/14
आई एस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मैसर्स हॉलमार्स एक्वा फार्म्स सर्वे सं. 175/2 ए2 , धारापुरम रोड , तिरुप्पुर ब्लॉक, एम. पुदुपालयम तिरुप्पुर तालुक, तिरुप्पुर -641665
1. 3582366
2011/12/16
आई एस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मैसर्स निशरिच कृस्टल वाटर्स 166 , उट्टपालयम , तलवैपट्टानम , धारापुरम-638672
5. 3582568
2011/12/16
आई एस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मैसर्स एस. आर. एक्वा प्युरिफायर्स 4/53, भारतीय नगर , गणपति , कोयम्बत्तूर ( पूर्व ) तालुक, कोयम्बत्तूर -641006
6. 3582467
2011/12/16
आई एस 12933 (पार्ट-1 ) : 2003 सौर सपाट पट्टिका संग्राहक भाग 1-अपेक्षाएं
मैसर्स वीसाट सोलार प्रोडक्ट्स एस एफ सं. 533 , तडागम रोड, सोमयमपालयम गांव , कोयम्बत्तूर -641108
7. 3582669
2011/12/19 अपकेन्द्रीय जेट पम्प
आई एस 12225 : 1997
मैसर्स एपेक्स इंडस्ट्री एसएफ सं. 334/2 , दरवाजा सं 14 -ए, राजागोपाल ले औट , पीलमेडु, कोयम्बत्तूर-641004
8. 3583166
2011/12/20 निमज्जनीय पंप सैट
आई एस 8034 : 2002
मेसर्स नेशनल एक्यूपमेंट कंपनी सं. 151 - बी-1 . अब्बै नायडु ले औट, पी.एन. पालयम रोड , गणपति, कोयम्बत्तूर -641006
[ संख्या सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीम जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2551
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
NewDelhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1057.- In pursuance of sub- regulation (5) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl. NO.
(2)
(3)
(4)
3577777
2011/12/05 M/s . Sriram Air Compressors (Coimbatore) Pvt . Ltd. 48-D, SNR College Road , Nava India , Coimbatore-641006
3580564 2011/12/14 M/ s . Pioneer Products No. 4 &5 , A.K.G Nagar, Varadharajapuram , Uppilipalayam , Coimbatore -641015
3580463
2011/12/14
Title of the Standard IS No./Part/Sec./ Year
(5)
(6)
IS9079: 2002 Electric Monoset pumps for clear, cold water for agricultural and water supply purposes
IS 14220 : 1994 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets
IS 14543: 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/s . Halmmars Aqua Farms Survey No. 175 /2A2 , Dharapuram Road , Tiruppur Block , M. Pudhupalayam, Tiruppur Taluk, Tiruppur -641665
3582366 2011/12/16
IS 14543:2004
M/s . Nishrich Crystal Waters 166 , Uttupaalayam , Thalavaipattanam, Dharapuram -638672
3582568 2011/12/16 M/ s . S.R. Aqua Purifiers 4/53 , Bharathi Nagar, Ganapathy, Coimbatore (North )Taluk , Coimbatore-641006
3582467 2011/12/16 M/s . Vesat Solar Products S.F. No. 533 , Thadagam Road , Somayampalayam Village , Coimbatore-641108
3582669 2011/12/19 M/s . Apex Industry SF . No. 334/2 , Door No. 14-A, Rajagopal Layout, Peelamedu , Coimbatore -641004
3583166
2011/12/20 M / s . National Equipment Company No. 151 - B - 1 , Abbai Naidu Layout, P.N.Palayam Road , Ganapathy, Coimbatore-641006 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (otherthan Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
IS 12933 ( Part 1) :
2003
Solar Flat Plate Collector Part 1 - Requirements
IS 12225: 1997 Centrifugal JetPumps
IS 8034 : 2002 Submersible Pumpsets
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head 2552
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 / PHALGUNA 27, 1933
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1058.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृति करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
2012/01/02
1. 3587376
भामा सं. ( भाग/ अनुभाग) : वर्ष
आईएस 9079 : 2002 कृषि तथा जल आपूर्ति के लिए साफ ठंडे पानी के बिजली के मोनोसेट पम्प्स
मैसर्स प्रभु इंडस्ट्री, सं. 733/4ए, तोट्टट्टीपालयम रोड, सिविल ऐरॉड्रॉम पोस्ट, कोयम्बत्तूर -641014
2012/01/03
2. 3590466
मैसर्स कुमरन पम्प्स, सं. 13 /ए, शिवा जोती नगर , सिविल ऐरॉड्रॉम पोस्ट, कोयम्बत्तूर -641014
3. 3592167
2012/01/12
निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
आईएस 8034 : 2002
आईएस 14220 : 1994 गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
मैसर्स नन्दि पम्प्स प्रायवेट लिमिटेड , एस एफ सं. 432 ,6वां क्रास , वी. के. रोड , तन्नीर पन्दल , कोयम्बत्तूर-641004
4.
2012/01/20
3595678
आईएस 8472 : 1998 पम्प- पुनर्योजी स्वच्छ ठंडे पानी के लिए
मैसर्स चेरन इंडस्ट्रीस सं. 78/1 , रवीन्द्रनाथ टैगोर स्ट्रीट , अतिपालयम रोड, गणपति, कोयम्बत्तर -641006
5. 3599585
2012/01/30
मैसर्स मावेल्स इंडस्ट्रीस , सं. । , दशकन्त नगर , गोल्डविन्स के सामने, अविनाशिरोड, कोयम्बत्तूर-641014
6. 3599686
2012/01/30
आईएस 9079 : 2002 कृषि तथा जल आपूर्ति के लिए साफ ठंडे पानी के बिजली के मोनोसेट पम्प्स
आईएस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मैसर्स पेरिन्बम एक्वा फार्म्स , 731/2, 731 /4ए , कुदारिपालयम , वेल्लिपालयम रोड , अन्नूर ब्लॉक, सिक्कडसमपालयम गाँव, मेटूपालयम तालुक, कोयम्बत्तूर-641302
[संख्या सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1058. In pursuance of sub- regulation ( 5) of the Regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation . 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :-- [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2553
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl. No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3587376
2012/01/02
Title of the Standard IS No./Part /Sec . , Year
(5)
(6)
IS 9079: 2002
M / s . Prabhu Industry, No. 733 /4A , Thottipalayam Road, CivilAerodrome Post , Coimbatore-641014
2. 3590466 2012/01/03 M/ s . Kumaran Pumps , No.13a, Siva Jothi Nagar, CivilAerodrome Post , Coimbatore-641014
3. 3592167
2012/01/12
Electric Monoset pumps for clear, cold water for agricultural and water supply purposes
Submersible Pumpsets IS 8034 : 2002
IS 14220: 1994 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets
M/ s. Nandi Pumps Private Limited, SF No. 432 , 6th CROSS , V.K. Road , Thanneer Pandal , Coimbatore - 641004
4 3595678 2012/01/20
IS 8472: 1998 Centrifugal Regenerative pumpsfor clear, cold water
M/ s . Cheran Industries , No. 78/1 , Ravindranath Tagore Street, Athipalayam Road, Ganapathy, Coimbatore-641006
5. 3599585 2012/01/30 M /s . Mavells Industries , No. 1 , Dhaskant Nagar, Opp . to gldwins , Avinashi Road, Coimbatore-641014
6 3599686 2012/01/30 M/s . Perinbam Aqua Farms , 731/2, 731 /4a , Kutharipalayam , Vellipalayam Road , Annur Block, Sikkadasampalayam Village , Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore- 641302
IS9079 : 2002 Electric Monoset pumps forclear, cold water for agricultural and water supply purposes
IS 14543: 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1059.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के बिनियम 4 के उप- विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम मंख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि, वर्ष/माह
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
!. 4401240
2012/02/02
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष भामा सं. ( भाग/ अनुभाग ) : वर्ष
(5)
(6)
आईएस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मैसर्स चेन्तूर एक्वा प्लेनट , एस एफ 444/ 2 ए , 2 ए, पूतोट्टम , मुतनमपालयम, त्रिरुप्पुर-641606
4405450
2012/02/08
मैसर्स नारायण इंडस्ट्रीस , 33-सी, वल्लुवर नगर ,
आईएस 14220 : 1994 गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पंप सेट 2554
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1
2
4
3
पीलमेडु, कोयम्बत्तूर-641004
2012/02/08
3. 4405753
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]
5
6
निज्जनीय पंप सेट
आईएस 8034 : 2002
मैसर्स एग्रो कास्ट पम्प प्रोडक्ट्स, एस एफ सं. 162 , ग्रास हिल रोड, के. आर. पुरम, गणपति पोस्ट, कोयम्बत्तूर-641006
4. 4405854
2012/02/08
आईएस 9283 : 1995 निज्जनीय पंप सेट के लिए मोटर
मैसर्स एग्रो कास्ट पम्प प्रोडक्ट्स, एस एफ सं. 162 , ग्रास हिल रोड, के. आर. पुरम, गणपति पोस्ट, कोयम्बत्तूर-641006
2012/02/16
5. 4411041
आईएस 13592 : 1992
मैसर्स जैन इरिगेशन सिस्टम्स लिमिटेड , एस एफ सं. 248/2 , 3 , 90 , एल्यामुतुर गाँव, उडुमलपेट-642154
2012/02/20
6. 4412043
मैसर्स कावेरी है टेक सं. 24/25 , पौन्ड रोड , पीलमेडु, कोयम्बत्तूर-641004
4412144
7.
2012/02/20 मैसर्स जे एण्ड जे इंजिनीयर्स , 114 , कालनूर , कारमडै ब्लॉक, जाडयमपालयम , मेटूपालयम-641302 संवातन और वर्षा के पानी के तन्त्र सहित भवनों के अन्दर की मिटी तथा अपट्टशिष्ट निरावेशन तन्त्र के लिए अनम्यकृत पी वी सी पाइपें
आईएस 14220 : 1994 गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पंप सेट
आईएस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)
[ संख्या सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1059.- In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of the Regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given inthe following schedule :-
SCHEDULE
Grant Date Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl. Licence No.
No.
(2)
(4)
(1)
(3)
1. 4401240 2012/02/02 M/ s . Chenthur Aqua Planet , SF 444/2A, 2A , Poothottam , Muthnampalayam , Tiruppur - 641606
2. 4405450 2012/02/08 M/s . Narayan Industries , 33 -C , Valluvar Nagar, Peelamedu, Coimbatore - 641004 Title of the Standard
IS No./Part/Sec . , Year
(5)
(6)
IS 14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
IS 14220: 1994 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2555
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2
3
4
3. 4405753
2012/02/08
5
6
IS8034: 2002 Submersible Pumpsets
M/s . Agro-Cast Pump Products , SF No. 162, Grass Hill Road, K.R.Puram , Ganapathy Post, Coimbatore- 641006
4. 4405854
2012/02/08
IS9283 : 1995 Motors for Submersible Pumpsets
M/ s . Agro- Cast Pump Products , SF No. 162, Grass Hill Road, K.R.Puram, Ganapathy Post, Coimbatore- 641006
5. 4411041
2012/02/16
IS 13592 : 1992
M/ s . Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd. , SF No. 248/2 , 3 , 90 , Ellayamuthur Village, Udumalpet-642154
6. 4412043 2012/02/20 M/ s . Kaverri Hi Tech , No. 24/25 Pound Road, Peelamedu Coimbatore-641004
7. 4412144
2012/02/20
UPVC pipes for soil and waste discharge systems inside buildings including ventilation and rainwater system
IS 14220 : 1994 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets
IS 14543: 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/s . J & J Engineers , 114, Kalanoor , Karamadai Block, Jadayampalayam , ' Mettupalayam -641302
[No. CMD/13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 10960.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उपविनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -
अनुसूची
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
संख्या
स्वीकृति करने की तिथि, वर्ष/माह
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3542758
2011/09/07
भामा सं./( भाग/ अनुभाग) : वर्ष
(5)
(6)
आईएस 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मैसर्स ग्लोबल क्रियेटर्स , 1571 सी 1 / 1सी2 , वेल्लारुगम पालयम, तोन्डामुतूर ब्लॉक , देवरायापुरम , कोयम्बतूर -641109
2.
2011/09/13
3545562
आईएस 8472 : 1998 साफ ठंडे पानी के लिए अपकेन्द्रीय पुनरुत्पादक पंप्स
मैसर्स बालू इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीस , सं. 1 , लक्ष्मी कॉर्नर , इलन्गो नगर , के. आर. पुरम , आवारमपालयम , कोयम्बतूर -641006
3545259
3.
2011/09/13
आईएस 14220 : 1994 गहरे कुओं के निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट
मैसर्स रिवा इंडस्ट्रीस , 25 - ए, कामाराज नगर , दूसरा सड़क , आवारमपालयम , गणपति, कोयम्बतूर -641006
686 GI /2012-10 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 / PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
4. 3546362
2011/09/15
मैसर्स सेनक्स स्टील्स प्रायवेट लिमिटेड, एस एफ सं. 42/2 , मुल्लुपडी रेलवे गेड रोड, सुलक्कल , पोल्लाची तालुक, कोयम्बतूर-642110
[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
(5)
(6)
आईएस 1786 : 2008 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्य विकसित इस्पात छड़ और तार
[ संख्या सीएमडी । 3:11 ]
वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1060. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation, 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Grant Date
Licence No.
IS No./Part/Sec .
Name and address (factory) of the party
S1 . No.
(2)
(1)
(4)
1. 3542758 2011/09/07
Title of the Standard
Year
(5)
(6)
IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water )
M/ s . Global Creators 1571C1 / 1C2, Vellarugam Palayam , Thondamuthur Block , Devarayapuram, Coimbatore-641109
2. 3545562
2011/09/13 M/ s . Balu Engineering Industries No. 1 , Lakshmi Corner, Elango Nagar, K.R. Puram, Avarampalayam, Coimbatore-641006
3. 3545259 2011/09/13 M/ s . Riva Industries 25 - A, Kamaraj Nagar, 2nd Str Avarampalayam , Ganapathy Coimbatore-641006
4. 3546362 2011/09/15 M/ s . Sanex Steels Pvt . Ltd. , SF. No. 42/2, Mulluppadi Railway GateRoad, Sulakkal, Pollachi Taluk , Coimbatore-642110
IS 8472 : 1998 Centrifugal Regenerative pumps for clear, cold water
IS 14220 : 1994 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets
IS 1786 : 2008 High Strength Deformed Steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1061.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उपविनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2557
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
क्रम संख्या
तिथि, वर्ष/माह स्वीकृति करने की
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 . 4402747
2012/02/03
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष भा मा सं./भाग/ अनुभाग/वर्ष
(5)
(6)
आईएस 1417 : 1999
मैसर्स एस. एस. तंगामालिगै ,
1065, बिग बाजार स्ट्रीट,
कोयम्बतूर-641001
2. 4402848
2012/02/03
मैसर्स एस . एस. तंगामालिगै , 1065 , बिग बाजार स्ट्रीट , कोयम्बतूर-641001
3. 4405955
2012/02/08
स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 2112 : 2003 चांदी तथा चांदी मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 1417: 1999
मैसर्स विस्रुता
383, 7वां सड़क, गांधीपुरम,
कोयम्बतूर -641012
4. 4406048
2012/02/08
स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 2112 : 2003 चांदी तथा चांदी मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्सविस्त्रुता
383, 7वां सड़क, गांधीपुरम ,
कोयम्बतूर-641012
5. 4410039
2012/02/13
आईएस 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स जवेरी ब्रॉस ज्वेलर्स 38/39, बिग बेल कॉम्प्लेक्स, 106 , डी.बी. रोड , आर.एस. पुरम , कोयम्बतूर -641002
6. 4409963
2012/02/13
आईएस 1417 : 1999 आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स श्री विग्नेश ज्वेलर्स 1369 , त्रिची रोड , पुराना सुंगम, विग्नेश बस स्टॉप , रामनाथापुरम , कोयम्बतूर-641045
7.
4412346
2012/02/21
मैसर्स न्यूप्रिया ज्वेलर्स मुख्य रोड, वेल्लाकोविल-638111
8. 4412245
2012/02/21
आईएस 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स आर एन जे ज्वेलर्स 152 , पोन्नय्याराजा पुरम, पहला स्ट्रीट , एस. के . कॉम्प्लेक्स , आर. एस. पुरम , कोयम्बतूर-641002
[ संख्या सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1061. In pursuance of sub- regulation (5) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation , 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Licence No Grant Date Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl . No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 . 4402747
2012/02/03 M/s . S.S. Thanggamaligai 1065 , Big Bazaar Street , Coimbatore-641001
IS No./Part/Sec .
Title of the Standard
Year
(5)
(5)
IS 1417: 1999 Gold andGoldAlloys, Jewelleryl Artefacts - Fineness and Marking 2558
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
2. 4402848
2012/02/03 M/s . S.S. Thanggamaligai 1065 , Big Bazaar Street, Coimbatore-641 001
3. 4405955 2012/02/08 M/ s . Visruta 383, 7th Street, Gandhipuram , Coimbatore-641 012
4. 4406048 2012/02/08 M/ s . Visruta 383, 7th Street , Gandhipuram , Coimbatore- 641 012
5. 4410039 2012/02/13 M/ s . Zaveri Bras Jewellers 38/39, Big Bell Complex, 106 D.B.Road , R.S.Puram , Coimbatore- 641002
6. 4409963
2012/02/13
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
(5)
(6)
IS2112 :2003
Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
IS2112 : 2003 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
M/ s . Sri Vignesh Jewellers 1369 , Trichy Road , Old Sungam , Vignesh Bus Stop , Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore-641 045
7. 4412346
2012/02/21 M/ s . New Priyaa Jewellers MainRoad, Vellakovil-638111
8. 4412245 2012/02/21
IS 1417: 1999 Go Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Markin
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
M/ s . RNJ Jewellers 152, Ponnaiyaraja Puram , 1st Street , S.K Complex , R.S. Puram , Coimbatore- 641 002
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 月
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1062.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988.के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं: -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि, वर्ष/माह
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 . 3589683
2012/01/03
मैसर्स सी. के. के. ज्वेलरी 1024 , बिग बाजार स्ट्रीट, कोयम्बतूर -641001
2. 3589582
2012/01/03
भा मा सं. /भाग अनुभाग/वर्ष
(6)
(5)
आईएस 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स चेम्मन्नूर इंटरनेशनल ज्वेलर्स सं. 295 , पेरिया कडा वीदी , कोयम्बतूर -641001
3. 3589481
2012/01/03
आईएस 1417 : 1999
मैसर्स चेम्मन्नूर इंटरनेशनल ज्वेलर्स दरवाजा सं. 247 , कमर्शियल रोड, ऊटी-643001 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2559
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
4. 3589077
2012/01/03
(5)
(6)
आईएस 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स डी.ए. आर. ज्वेलरी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दुकान सं. जी 9 , ब्रूकफील्ड एस्टेट, डॉ. कृष्णस्वामी रोड, कोयम्बतूर-641009
5. 3589178
2012/01/03
आईएस 1417 : 1999
मैसर्स मलबार फेशन ज्वेलरी 10/663 , मैसूर रोड, गूडलूर, द नीलगिरीस-643212
6. 3589784
2012/01/03
स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 1417 : 1999
मैसर्स मनप्पुरम ज्वेलर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , 005/1 , 005/2 , कच्चेरी स्ट्रीट , ईरोड -638001
7. 3591367
2012/01/06
स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 2112 : 2003
मैसर्स मनप्पुरम ज्वेलर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , 005/1 , 005/2 , कच्चेरी स्ट्रीट , ईरोड-638001
चाँदी तथा चाँदी मिश्र धातुएं एवं मार्किंग आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता
[ संख्या सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1062. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation , 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl . No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3589683
2012/01/03 M/ s . C.K.K. Jewellery 1024, Big Bazaar Street , Coimbatore-641001
2. 3589582
2012/01/03
Title of the Standard
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999 Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999
M / s . Chemmanur International Jewellers No. 295 , Periya Kada Veedhi , Coimbatore- 641001
3. 3589481
2012/01/03
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999
M / s . Chemmanur International Jewellers Door No. 247 , Commercial Road, Ooty-643001
4. 3589077
2012/01/03
Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999 GoldandGoldAlloys , Jwellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
M/ s . D.A.R Jewellery Private Limited Shop No. G9 , Brookefield Estate, Dr. Krishnaswamy Road , Coimbatore-641 009
5 3589178
2012/01/03 M/s. Malabar Fashion Jewellery 10/663 , Mysore Road , Gudalur , TheNilgiris-643212
6. 3589784
2012/01/03
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999
M/s . Mannapuram Jewellers Private Limited 005/1 , 005/2 , Cutchery Street, Erode-638001 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and MarkinQ 2560
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PH ALGUNA 27 , 1933
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
7. 3591367
2012/01/06
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
(5)
(6)
IS2112: 2003
M/ s. Mannapuram Jewellers Private Limited
005/1,005/2, Cutchery Street, Erode-63800 1
Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head ]
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1063.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
1
2
3
4
1. 3579377
2011/12/12
मैसर्स मनप्पुरम ज्वेलर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड सं. 229/230 , नया शिवा टॉवर्स , कुमरन रोड, तिरुप्पुर-641601
2. 3580160
2011/12/12
मैसर्स श्री बालाजी ज्वेलर्स 186/261 , मुख्य बाजार , ऊटी-643001
3. 3583065
2011/12/20
मैसर्स सुमन्गली ज्वेलर्स 318 , राजा स्ट्रीट, कोयम्बतूर-641001
भा मा सं./भाग/ अनुभाग/वर्ष
5
6
आईएस 2112 : 2003 चाँदी तथा चाँदी मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 2112 : 2003 चाँदी तथा चाँदी मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
आईएस 2112 : 2003 चाँदी तथा चाँदी मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
[संख्या सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1063.- In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Grant Date
Licence No
Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3579377
2011/12/12 M/ s . Manapuram Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. No. 229/230 , New Siva Towers , Kumaran Road , Tiruppur-641601
2. 3580160
2011/12/12 M/ s . Sri Balaji Jewellers 186/261 , Main Bazaar , Ooty-643001
3. 3583065
2011/12/20 M/ s . Sumangali , Jewellers 318 , Raja Street, Coimbatore- 641001 Title of the Standard
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS2112: 2003 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS2112: 2003 Silverand Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS2112: 2003 Silver and SilverAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY , Scientist ' F ' & Head] [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2561
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1064.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनि यम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3553864
20111013
मैसर्स चिन्नान्नन ज्वेलरी , 157 , बाज़ार सड़क , पोल्लाची-642001
2. 3556163
20111019
मैसर्स चिन्नान्नन ज्वेलरी , 157 , बाज़ार सड़क, पोल्लाची-642001
3. 3556466
20111019
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष भा मा सं./ भाग/अनुभाग/वर्ष
(5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
IS 2112: 2003 चाँदी तथा चाँदी मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
IS 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स मनप्पुरम ज्वेलर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड, सं 229/230 , नया शिवा टॉवर्स , कुमरन रोड, तिरूप्पुर-641601
4. 3560053
20111028
मैसर्स बालाजी ज्वेलर्स, 186/261 , मुख्य बाजार , ऊटी-643001
IS 141 : 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13: 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1064.- In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date
Name and address (factory) of the party
SI. No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3553864
20111013
Title ofthe Standard
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 1417 : 1999
M/ s . Chinnannaan Jewellery
157, Bazaar Street, Pollachi-642001
2. 3556163
20111019
Gold andGoldAlloys Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
2112: 2003
M/s. Chinnannaan Jewellery
157, Bazaar Street, Pollachi -642001
3. 3556466
20111019
Silverand Silver Alloys IS Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS 1417: 1999
M/s. Manappuram Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. , No. 229/230 , New Siva Towers , Kumaran Road ,Tiruppur -641601
4. 3560053
20111028
Goldand GoldAlloys Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS 1417 : 1999
M/s. Sri Balaji Jewellers
186/261, Main Bazaar, Ooty-643001
Gold andGoldAlloys Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head 2562
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1065.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
1. 3530044
2011/08/08
भा मा सं. / भाग/अनुभाग/वर्ष
मैसर्स वी. नटराज मुदलियर एण्ड
सन्सज्वेलर्स ,
416/09 , मुख्य सड़क , अविनाशि-641654 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, IS 1417: 1999
आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता
एवं मार्किंग
[सं. सी एम डी/13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1065.- In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule :--
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl. No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3530044
2011/08/08
Title of the Standard
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
(5)
(6)
IS 1417 : 1999
M/s . V. Natraj Mudaliar And Sons
Jwellers
416/09, Main Road , Avinashi -641654
GoldandGold Alloys Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1066.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
2011/07/05
1. 3515250
मैसर्स श्री तंगा मालिगै भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष भा मा सं. / भाग/अनुभाग/वर्ष
स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , IS 1417 : 1999
आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
श्री मुरुगन टावर्स, 703 , राजा स्ट्रीट ,
कोयम्बत्तूर-641001
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1066.-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule :-
2563
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
SCHEDULE
Grant Date
Licence No
IS No./Part/Sec .
Name and address (factory) of the party
SL No.
2011/07/05
3515250
1.
Year
Title of the Standard
IS 1417: 1999 Goldand GoldAlloys
M/s. Shree Thanga Maaligai , Sri Murugan Towers , 703 , Raja Street, Coimbatore-641001 Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1067.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा सं. / भाग/अनुभाग/वर्ष
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
स्वीकृति करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
क्रम संख्या
2011/06/15
1. 3509053
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
मैसर्स सौबर्निका ज्वेलरी , 49/डी, क्लॉक टॉवर के पास , बज्रार स्ट्रीट , सत्यामंगलम -638401
2011/06/15
2. 3508960
मैसर्स महेन्द्राज्वेलर्स 122, बज़ार सड़क , सत्यामंगलम-638401
2011/06/15
3508859
3.
मैसर्स महेश्वरी ज्वेलरी 712, बजार सडक , सत्यामंगलमें-638401
2011/06/15
4. 3508758
मैसर्स गोतम ज्वेलर्स 247, मुख्य बजार , ऊटी-643001
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, एवं मार्किंग आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1067. In pursuance of sub- regulation (5 ) ofthe regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule:-
SCHEDULE
Name and address (factory) of the party
Grant Date
Licence No
S1 No.
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
2011/06/15
3509053
M/s. Sowbarnika Jwellery 1.
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
Title ofthe Standard
(6) (5)
GoldandGoldAlloys IS 1417 : 1999
Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
49/D, Near Clock Tower , Bazar Street ,
Sathyamangalam-638401
2011/06/15
3508960
2.
M/s. Mahendra Jewellers , 122, Bazaar Street, Sathyamangalam -638401
686 GI /2012-11
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and GoldAlloys Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking 2564
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27, 1933
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
3. 3508859
2011/06/15
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(5)
(6)
Gold and Gold Alloys IS 1417: 1999
M/ s. Maheshwari Jewellary, 712, Bazaar Street, Sathyamangalam- 638401
4 3508758
2011/06/15
Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS 1417 : 1999
M/ s. Gotham Jewellers ,
247, Main Bazaar, Ooty-643001
Gold and GoldAlloys Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1068.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम स्वीकृति करने की भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा सं./अनुभाग/खंड/वर्ष
संख्या तिथिवर्ष/माह
1. 3501542 2011/05/20 मैसर्स एन.एन. वाराणवासी गौन्डर
चाँदी तथा चाँदी मिश्र धातुएं, IS 2112: 2003
ज्वेलरी 12 , पोन्न सड़क , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता
ईरोड-638001 एवं मार्किंग
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1068. In pursuance of sub- regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation, 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :--
SCHEDULE
Licence No Grant Date
IS No./Part/Sec .
Name and address ( factory) of the party
SI . No.
1. 3501542
2011/05/20
Title of the Standard
Year
M /s . N.N. Varanavasi Gounder Jewellery 12 , Ponn Street, Erode - 638001
Silver and Silver Alloys IS 2112: 2003 Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/ 13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली , 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1069.-- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृति करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह
(1 ) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 . 3485772
2011/04/12
मैसर्स विक्टोरिया ज्वेलर्स
दरवाजा सं. 6/6A , हरिप्रिया कॉम्पलेक्स , कोयम्बत्तूर रोड, मेटूपालयम-641301 भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा सं. / भाग/अनुभाग/वर्ष
(5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2565
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
2. 3488071
2011/04/19
(5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
मैसर्स श्री कृष्णा ज्वेलरी 11/287 , केलिकट रोड , चेरम्बाडी, द नीलगिरीस-643205 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
NewDelhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1069. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date
Name and address (factory) of the party
SI . No.
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. 3485772
2011/04/12
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
Title of the Standard (5)
(6)
IS 1417 : 1999
M/s. Victoria Jewellers D. No. 6 /6A , Haripriya Complex Coimbatore Road, Mettupalayam -641301
2. 3488071 2011/04/19
Gold andGoldAlloys Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
IS 1417 : 1999
M/ s . Sree Krishna Jewellary 11/287, Calicut Road, Cherambadi , TheNilgiris -643205 Gold and GoldAlloys Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13: 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2012
का.आ. 1070.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस संख्या
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता
क्रम संख्या
स्वीकृति करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
1. 3472056
2011/03/18
मैसर्स केरला फेशन ज्वेलरी
50 , पोल्लाची रोड, उडुमलपेट-642126 भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा सं./ भाग/अनुभाग/वर्ष
IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
वर्गीस जॉय , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 24th February, 2012
S.O. 1070.-In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) ofthe regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation , 1988 , Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :
SCHEDULE
Licence No. Grant Date
Name and address ( factory) of the party
Sl . No.
1. 3472056
2011/03/18
Title ofthe Standard
IS No./Part/Sec . Year
IS 1417 : 1999
M/ s . Kerala Fashion Jewellery 50, Pollachi Road, Udumalpettu - 642126
Gold andGoldAlloys Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
VARGHESE JOY, Scientist ' F ' & Head 2566
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2012
का.आ. 1071.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप- नियम 5 के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिये गए हैं:-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता कीतिथि वर्ष/
स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि
क्रम सं
4
2
3
27-1-2012
3797185
1.
अनभाग वर्ष
भाग
भामा
भारीतय मानक का शीर्षक संख्या
6
7 8 9 5
2004
14543
मैसर्स मोकाशी एग्रो सर्वे नं. 6/1 , प्रोपर्टी नं. 462 एवं 463 ओताडे हंडेवाडी तालुका हवेली , जिला पुणे , महाराष्ट्र ।
9-2-2012
3802859
2.
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्ट
2004
14543
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्ट
मैसर्स कमल इंडस्ट्रीज प्लाट नं. 2 , शहीद बाबा दीप सिंहजी नगर , शहीद भगत सिंह रोड , जिला नांदेड, महाराष्ट्र-4316011
13-2-2012
3771975
3.
2004
14543
मैसर्स मधुबन एग्री प्रॉडक्टस , गट सं. 331 , नेर तालुका एवं जिला जलाना महाराष्ट्र-431203 |
4.
27-1-2012
3732965
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) विशिष्ट
2004
14543
मैसर्स शिवशक्ति इंडस्ट्रीज प्लाट नं. 44/11 , एमआईडीसी , जिला बीड महाराष्ट्र- 431122 |
5.
3805259 16-2-2012
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्ट
2004
14543
पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्ट
मैसर्स वेंकटेश्वरा बेवरेजेज प्लाट नं. 1487 , कोल्हापुर सांगली रोड , हटकानंगले बस स्टाप के पास , तालुका हटकानंगले , जिला कोल्हापुर , महाराष्ट्र-416109 1
14-2-2012
6. 3806160
1988
एनरोइड टाइप रक्त 7652 वापमापी (सिफ्नोमैनोमीटर )
मैसर्स इंडस्ट्रीयल इलेक्ट्रॉनिक एंड एलाइड प्रोडक्ट्स प्लाट नं. 20 , 21 , 33 और 34 इलेक्ट्रॉनिक को-ऑप. इस्टेट लि. पुणे सातारा रोड, जिला पुणे, महाराष्ट्र-411009 ।
7.
24-2-2012
3772977
2004
14543
पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) विशिष्ट
मैसर्स जयश्री फूड एंड बेवरेजेज इंडस्ट्री स. नं. 10/1/3 भोसले नगर , औताडे , हंडेवाडी रोड , तालुका हवेली , जिला पुणे, महाराष्ट्र ।
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]
बी.एम. हनीफ , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 5th March , 2012
S.O. 1071.-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule :
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2567
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
GrantDate SCHEDULE
ISNo. Part Sec . Year
Name and address of the party
Sl. No.
Licence No.
1
2
3
4
1.
3797185 27-01-2012 Titleof the Standard
5
6
8
9
7
2004
14543
M/ s. Mokashi Agro Survey No. 6/1 , Property No. 462 & 463 , Autade Handewadi , Taluka Haveli, District Pune , Maharashtra.
2.
3802859 9-2-2012
Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)- Specification
2004
14543
M/ s . Kamal Industries PlotNo. 2 Shahid Baba Deep Singhji , Nagar, Shahid Bhagar Singh Road, District Nanded , Maharashtra -431601 .
3. 3771975 13-2-2012 Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water) - Specification
2004
14543
M/ s . Madhuban Agri Products GutNo, 331 , Ner Taluka & District Jalna, Maharashtra -431203 .
4. 3732965 27-01-2012 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineralwater)- Specification
2004
14543
M/ s. Shivshakti Industries Plot No. 44/11 , MIDC , District Beed, Maharashtra-431122 .
5.
3805259 16-2-2012.
Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)- Specification
2004
14543
M/ s. Venkateshwara Beverages PlotNo. 1487, Kolhapur Sangli Road, Near Hatkanangale Bus Stop , Taluka Hatkanangale , District Kolhapur, Maharashtra- 416109 .
6. 3806160 14-2-2012
Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water) - Specification
1988
7652
Sphygmomano- meter Aneroid type
M/ s. Industrial Electronic & Allied Products Plot No. 20 , 21 , 33 & 34 Electronic Co -Op . Estate Ltd. , Pune - Satara Road , District Pune , Maharashtra -411009 .
7. 3772977 24-2-2012
2004
14543
M/s. Jayshree Food & Beverage Industry S. No. 10/1/3 Bhosale Nagar Authade, Handewadi Road , Taluka Haveli , District Pune .
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water) - Specification
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]
B.M. HANEEF , Scientist ' F ' & Head
नई दिल्ली , 5 मार्च, 2012
का.आ. 1072.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप- नियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द /स्थगित कर दिया गया है :
2568
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम संख्या
लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-
1376252
1.
मेसर्स डेक्सेल प्लास्ट प्रा. लि. ,
मुटकेवाडी, एन. एच. 50 चाकण, तालुका खेड, जिला पुणे , महाराष्ट्र-410501
रद्द करने की तिथि लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
6-02-2012 भा मा 4985 :2000 पेय जल आपूर्ति के लिए अप्लास्टिकृत पीवीसी पाइप्स
[सं. सी एम डी-13: 13 ]
बी. एम. हनीफ , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi , the 5th March , 2012
S.O. 1072. In pursuance of sub - regulation (6) ofthe regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
CM/L- Licence No. Name and Address of the Licensee
No. SL
1. 1376252
M/s . Dexcel Plast Pvt . Ltd. , Mutkewadi N.H. 50 , Chakan Taluk Khed , District Pune , Maharashtra -410501
Date of Cancellation Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled/suspension
6-02-2012 IS4985:2000
Unplasticized PVC pipes for potable water supplies
[No. CMD/13 : 13 ]
B.M. HANEEF, Scientist ' F ' & Head
पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च , 2012
का.आ. 1073.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इससे पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1985 तारीख 18 जुलाई , 2011 ओड़िशा के पारादीप से बिहार राज्य के बरौनी तक कूड के परिवहन के लिए दामोदर नदी के आरपार एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन हेतु उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 15-10-2011 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दी थी;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ;
यह और कि केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त धारा की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमियों के उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोशान लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ;
अनुसूची
जिला : वर्धमान पुलिस थाना: खनन्डघोष
प्लॉट संख्या गाँव का नाम अधिकारिता सूची
(3)
(2)
(1)
56
1540 न पारा
1537
राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल
वर्ग मीटर र्हक्टर
एयर
(4)
(5)
(6)
00
01
30
01
00
50 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1547
00
1537
00
1540
00
1540
00
1540
00
1540
00
1540
00
मशील्ला 57
636
00
611
00
611
00
611
00
610
00
630
00
635
00
611
00
614
00
611
00
611
00
611
00
631
00
611
00
611
00
611
00
613
00
611
00
2569
(5)
(6)
02
60
00
82
01
29
02
25
01
18
01
30
01
52
01
22
00
40
00
80
01
58
01
21
01
17
01
38
01
61
01
29
00
39
00
80
01
41
01
48
00
39
00
39
01
31
02
44
00
20
[फा. सं. आर-25011/4/2010- ओआर-1 ]
लाल छन्दमा , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi , the 12th March , 2012
S.O. 1073.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas No. 31. dated: 30-07-2011 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), the Central Government declared its Intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline across Damodar river in the state of West Bengal for transportation of crude oil .
Andwhereas , the copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 15-10-2011 . And whereas . the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government .
And whereas . Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired .
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule to this notification is hereby acquired [PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012 / PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2570
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub - section (4) of the said section , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government ; vest , free from all encumbrances , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
SCHEDULE
State: West- Bengal
District: Burdwan
Police Station : Khandaghosh
PlotNo.
Jurisdiction
Name ofVillage
ListNo.
1540
56
Napara
1537
1540
1537
1540
1540
1540
1540
1540
636
57
Mashilla
611
611
611
610
630
635
611
614
611
611
611
631
611
611
611
613
611
Area
Are
Square Metre Hectare
30
01
00
50
01
00
60
02
00
82
00
00
29
01
00
25
02
00
18
01
00
30
01
00
52
01
00
22
01
00
40
00
00
80
00
00
58 00
01
21
01
00
17
01
00
38
01
00
61
01
00
00
01
29
39
00
00
00
80 00
41 00
01
01
48 00
39 00
00
39
00
00
31
01
00
44
02
00
00
20 00
[F. No. R- 25011/4/2010-OR - 1 ]
LAL CHHANDAMA , Under Secy.
2571 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
नई दिल्ली, 13 मार्च , 2012
का. आ. 1074.- भारत सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूषि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ . 2740 (अ) तारीख 28 नवंबर, 2011 के साथ पठित अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ . 728 तारीख 28 फरवरी , 2011 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- बासुदेबपुर- हावडा गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और, उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 14 अक्तूबर , 2011 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
और , पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में, जनता की ओर से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और , भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः, अब, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
686 G1/2012-12 2572
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
अनुसूची
[ Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
गज्यओडिशा
जिन्ना चालेश्वर
मंडल/ नेहसिल/ तालुक निलगिए।
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं.
2 1
1071
टनका
1073
1072
773
1074
770
771
772
474
476
475
485
484
486
488
487
490
489
491
493
492
483
496
494
495
498
499
500
501
447
512
513
523
525
522
521
527
आर.ओ.यू.अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर सि- एयर
3
5
05
00
84
00
19
00
(17
00
00
(10
(K)
(۱۲۱
02
9
00
01
3
00
00
00
00
00
03
00
12
17
00
00
00
00
04
(10
00
04
00
04
00
03
i:
02
00
83
02
00
00
97
00
02
86
00
0.1
00
06
66
00
28
00
00
00
43
00
03
42
00
00
00
41
09
31
00
00
03
61
00
08
31
00
11
81
00
13
00
00
07
40
05
00
17
00
70
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2573
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2
3
) टनका ( निरंतर 534 00 (0)
685 00 12
683 00 03 54
682 00 ! 1
680 00 04
676 00 02
677 00 02
674 00 04
नंडल/ नेहसिल/ नानुक: खैरा जिला वालेश्वर गन्य डिग
दुलारपुर 319 00 16 5
323 00 04 36
324 00 05
325 00 00
93 00 00
102 00 05 3
104 00 03
105 00 00 83
101 00 00
103 00 05 5
106 00 06
113 00 04
110 00 08 S
114 00 00 74
-
133 00 08
132 00 01
135 00 09 00
163 00 10 54
165 09 13 72
168 00 01 96
169 00 02 71
175 00 01 21
174 00 02 07
173 00 01 38
172 00 00 67
187 00 02 07
186 00 01 32
185 00 26 24
199 00 00 64
200 00 02 07
कासिंदिपुर 410 00 06
411 00 05 55
421 00 02 06
420 00 19
2574
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2
414
2 ) काभिदिपुर (निरंतर)
418
423
202
[Part II--Sec . 3 ( ii) ]
3
4
25
00
06
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
जिला वालश्वर
मंडल/ नेहमिल/ तालुक: सिमिलिया
1) कुंडी 1160
1161
1163
1156
1144
1149
1148
1138
1137
1139
1129
1126
1122
2 सबंग 164
165
167
149
151
150
147
146
307
308
309
320
317
319
326
327
328
332
331
363
527
495
496
493
492
गज्य आडिया
00 01 9% 00 01 00 00 18 00 00 60 00 01 4 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 01 4 00 01 X 00 01 9 00 01 00 00 00 02 20 00 12 78 00 00 00 06 81 00 01 38 00 02 76 00 16 88 00 00 10 00 02 15 00 13 13 00 01 33 00 00 40 00 00 16 00 05 74 00 00 10 00 02 98 00 04 66 00 07 62 00 21 65 00 01 19 00 00 34 00 14 85 00 09 01 00 02 06 00 00 19
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2575
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27. 1933
1 3
2 ) सबंग (निम्नर 526 00 97
497 00 09
491 00 01
498 00 06
499 00 04 99
500 00 00 60
486 00 10 יי
485 00 01 90
484 00 04
483 00 03 15
482 00 01 17
479 00 00 10
476 00 04
477 00 04 27
469 00 01 20
468 00 03 69
478 00 00 39
465 00 03 42
467 00 00 10
466 00 03 57
464 00 02 49
806 00 02
808 00 13 89
809 00 00 29
810 00 07 51
811 00 01 59
819 00 07 87
812 00 00 62
824 00 00 25
817 00 13 61
835 00 04 11
833 00 00 78
834 00 03 85
836 00 02 51
839 00 00 24
837 00 02 19
838 00 03 02
840 00 00 96
मंडल/ नेहमिल/ तालुक बस्ता जिला बालेश्वर गज्य:आडिशा
1 ) वाग्माडिआ 104/702 00 08 66
103/701 00 09 43
105/703 00 04 31
106/704 00 01 44
2576
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
700
102/699
100/697
66/662
91/687
90/586
75/671
Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
3
い
00
117
00
86
(0)
60
00
10
00
00
50
00
00
जिला वालध्वर
136 00
किस्मन गावधनपर
143 00
144 00
146 00
147 00 14
149 00 (1) に
148 00 06
151 00 00
157 00 06
161 00 00 10
156 00 12 43
155 00 01 34
171 00 0: 49
173 00 06 96
176 00 04 43
174 00 00 36
175 00 08 94
187 00 02 30
112 00 00 59
111 00 01 53
109 00 04 84
110 00 01 15
190 00 00 51
103 00 05 17
92 00 01 53
60 00 01 48
165 00 03 51
2 ) चकाघु 00 15 37
166
171 00 08 09
172 00 13 94
175 00 08 08
178 00 03 57
00 06 28
177
133 00 02 16
132 00 01 46
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2577
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2
3 4 5
2 ) चकाधु (निरंत ) 131 00 11 09
126 00 00 15
127 00 19 66
128 00 00 72
119 00 02 82
120 00 03 95
121 00 01 98
118 00 08 29
122 00 00 29
220 00 04 52
218 00 01 13
225 00 00 10
224 00 23 57
205 00 00 45
204 00 03 86
199 00 92 11
[फा सं. एल.-14014/15/2011-जी.पी. ] ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th March , 2012
S. O. 1074.- Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 728 dated 28th Feburary , 2011 , read with their notification number S.O. 2740(E) dated 28th November , 2011 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada- Basudebpur - Howrah gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/ s Reliance Industries Limited by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 14th October , 2011;
And whereas , no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;
And whereas , Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , have decided to acquire the Right of User therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declare that the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification, is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , free from all encumbrances .
[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2578
Schedule
District: Baleshwar State: Orissa
Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Nilagiri
Survey No./Sub-Division No. Area to be acquired for Rou
Village
Hec Are C-Are
2 3 4 5
1
00 US 84
1 ) Tanaka 1071
00 19 00
1073
00 07 18
1072
773 00 00 10
1074 00 00 82
00 102 96
770
00 (01 63
771
00 00 64
772
00 (1) 52
474
00 03 83
476
00 12 11
475
485 00 17 27
484 00 00 69
00 04 35
486
488 00 00 65
487 00 04 00
490 00 04 99
489 00 03 77
491 00 02 14
493 00 02 88
00 02 39
492
483 00 02 97
00 02 86
496
494 00 04 36
495 00 06 66
498 00 00 28
00 00 43
499
500 00 03 42
501 00 00 41
447 00 09 31
512 00 03 61
513 00 08 31
523 00 11 81
525 00 13 00
522 00 07 40
00 05 17
521
527 00 00 70
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2579
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2 1
1 ) Tanaka ( Contd) 534
685
683
682
680
676
677
674
Mandal/ Tehsil/ Taluk: Khaira District: Baleshwar
1 ) Dularpur 319
323
324
325
93
102
104
105
101
103
106
113
110
114
133
132
135
163
165
168
169
175
174
173
172
187
186
185
199
200
2) Kasindipur 410
411
421
420.
686GI /2012-13
4
3
5
00 09 22
00 12 52
00 03 54
00 65
00 04 42
00 02 95
00 02 74
00 04 06
State: Orissa
00 16 51
00 04 36
00 05 00
00 00 10
00 00 95
00 05 03
00 03 80
00 00 85
00 00 65
00 05 15
00 06 31
00 04 94
00 08 80
00 00 74
00 08 77
00 01 53
00 09 06
00 10 54
00 13 72
00 01 96
00 02 71
00 01 21
00 02 07
00 01 38
00 00 67
00 02 07
00 32
00 26 24
00 00 64
00 02 07
00 06 14
00 05 55
00 02 06
00 19 52
2580
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2
2 ) Kasindipur( Conid) 414
418
423
202
Mandal /Tehsil/ Taluk : Similia District: Baleshwar
1 ) Kundi 1160
1161
1163
1156
1144
1149
1-148
1138
1137
1139
1129
1126
1122
2 ) Sabang 164
165
167
149
151
150
147
146
307
308
309
320
317
319
326
327
328
332
331
363
527
495
496
493
492
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]
3 4 5 00 06 25 00 00 44 00 00 10 00 00 35 State: Orissa 00 01 98 00 01 01 00 00 18 00 00 69 00 01 45 00 00 10 00 00 08 00 04 20 00 01 41 00 01 88 00 01 79 00 01 48 00 00 10 00 02 20 00 12 78 00 00 78 00 06 81 00 01 38 00 02 76 00 16 88 00 00 10 00 02 15 00 13 13 00 01 33 00 00 40 00 00 16 00 05 74 00 00 10 00 02 98 00 04 66 00 07 62 00 21 65 00 01 19 00 00 34 00 14 85 00 09 01 00 02 06 00 00 19
2581
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3 4 5
2
00 01 97
2) Sabang (Contd) 526
00 09 54
497
00 01 97
491
00 06 25
498
00 04 99
499
00 00 60
500
00 10 22
486
00 01 90
485
00 04 02
484
00 03 15
483
00 01 37
482
00 00 10
479
00 04 03
476
00 04 27
477
00 01 20
469
00 03 69
468
00 00 39
478
00 03 42
465
467 00 00 10
00 03 57
466
00 02 49
464
00 02 11
806
00 13 89
808
00 00 29
809
00 07 61
810
00 01 59
811
00 07 87
819
00 00 62
812
00 00 25
824
00 13 61
817
00 04 11
835
00 00 78
833
00 03 85
834
00 02 51
836
00 00 24
839
00 02 19
837
00 03 02
838
00 00 96
840
District: Baleshwar State: Orissa
Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Basta
00 08 66
104/702
1 ) Barmadia 43
103/701 00 09
00 04 31
105/703
00 01 44
106/704
2582
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2
1 ) Barmadia ( Contd) 700
102/699
100/697
66/662
91/687
90/686
75/671
Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk: Jaleswar District: Baleshwar
1 ) Kismat obardhanpur 136
143
144
146
147
149
148
151
157
161
156
155
171
173
176
174
175
187
112
111
109
110
190
103
92
60
2 ) Chakraghu 165
166
171
172
175
178
177
133
132
131
126
127
128
119
120
121
118
1
[Part II-Sec. 3( ii) ]
3 4 5
00 01 87
00 07 86
00 08 60
00 00 10
00 00 30
00 01 59
00 00 12
State: Orissa
00 02 81
00 09 40
00 00 53
00 01 59
00 08 49
00 01 02
00 06 45
00 00 56
00 06
00 00 10
00 12 43
00 01 34
00 01 49
00 06 96
00 04 43
00 00 36
00 08 94
00 02
30
00 00 59
00 01
53
00 04 84
00 01 15
00 00 51
00 05 17
00 01 53
00 01 48
00 03 51
00 15 37
00 08 09
00 13 94
00 08 08
00 03 57
00 06 28
00 02 16
00 01 46
00 11 09
00 00 15
00 19 66
00 00 72
00 02 82
00 03 95
00 01 98
00 08
29
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27, 1933
2583
2
3
4
5 2) Chakraghu (Contd)
122
00
00
29
220
00
04
52
218
00
01
13
225
00
00
10
224
00
23
57
205
00
00
45
204
00
03
86
199
02
11
[F. No. L - 14014/15/2011 -GP. ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 13 मार्च , 2012
का. आ. 1075.-भारत सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ. 2740 (अ ) तारीख 28 नवंबर, 2011 के साथ पठित अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ . 727 तारीख 28 फरवरी, 2011 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- वासुदेवपुर- हावडा गैस पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा की थी ;
और, उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 20 अक्तूबर , 2011 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलव्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
और, पाइपलाइन विछाने के सम्बन्ध में, जनता की ओर से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और, भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः, अव, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोपणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोपणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के वजाए, सभी विल्लगम्रों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
[Part II ----Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2584
अनुसूची
गज्य:ओडिशा
जिन्ना बालेश्वर
मंडल/ तेहमिल/ तालुक सोरो
सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं.
गाँव कानाम
2
1
21
1 ) भाटपडा
19
22
23
29
24
27
25
26
16
49
15
9
13/16
2 ) बणपारिआ
19/23
1349
3 ) कुरुणिया
1347
1348
1342
1352
1353
1355
1356
1357
1324
1358
1323
1127
1126
1125
9/11
कोलधा
8/10
17/20
18/21
114
5 ) वंशिखार्जी
117
5/10 आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने
के लिए क्षेत्रफल
सि-एयर
एयर
हेक्टेयर
5
4
3
91
01
00
07
04
00
02
07
000
40
03
00
10
01
00
91
06
00
79
04
00
22
00
00
82
03
00
63
11
00
78
17
00
30
06
00
13
08
00
00
18
00
01
17
00
18
12
00
10
00
00
83
09
00
41
00
00
06
10
00
00
04
00
12
06
00
37
04
00
50
00
00
81
04
00
93
17
00
17
00
00
34
02
00
15
05
00
12
00
00
86
19
00
23
07
00
20
04
00
10
00
00
72
04
00
48
02
00
35
17
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
2
5 ) वंशिवार्जी (निरंतर) 3/7
38
83
6 ) नदिगॉ 1858
1859
1857
1856
1861
1855
1837
1836
1835
1834
1833
1832
1829
1827
1828
113
114
7 ) सतसंख 842
787
782
771
711
702
639
604
606
588
587
575
579
576
555
558
552
8 ) चहलिमा 717
703
676
660
661
2585
3
4
5
00 06 61
00 11 76
00 15 80
00 09 98
00 02
30
00 08 80
00 01 34
00 14 22
00 02
08
00 03 61
(00 14 60
00 08 76
00 07
91
00 12
08
00 10 19
00 00 10
00 00 29
00 08 03
00 18 62
00 05
19
00 01
68
00 10 38
00 05
53
00 00 10
00 00 52
00 05 08
00 03 81
00 06 51
00 01 75
00 03 49
00 04
81
00 10
15
00 00 10
00 17
19
00 07 99
00 03
66
00 01 49
00 12
23
00 02
68
00 21
15
00 00
69
00 10 02
2586
[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
3 4 5
2
1
00 13 56
8 ) चहलिमा (निग्नर 584
00 00 10
514
१ ) वालिपुर 00 06 88
518
00 01 08
503
00 03 68
497
00 48 06
261
00 05 87
244
00 00 10
246
00 06 64
61
10) चंपो 00 03 53
62
00 36
63
00 14 94
68
00 01 04
69
11 94
00
70
00 23 80
71
00 02 87
53
00 (02 18
50
00 13 68
51
( 1() 15 99
48
00 01 96
40
00 02 55
39
00 16 81
144
00 06 95
147
00 00 10
148
00 17 50
150
00 02 60
163
00 18 23
165
00 11 54
168
00 00 15
170
00 00 41
172
00 05 14
1492
11 ) आंगुला 00 06 05
1494
00 06 00
1495
00 10 51
1504
00 00 46
1788
00 02 00
1789
00 03 02
1790
00 00 11
1791
00 12 05
1802
00 17 06
1861
00 01 67
1856
00 00 10
1852
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2
11 ) आंगुला (निग्नर) 2081
2079
2072
1943
1944
1948
1947
1945
1955
1946
857
856
1957
854
853
852
855
850
851
848
12) मंत्री 36
35
34
26
23
22
17
374
380
981
1010
1011
1009
1008
1007
1006
1019
1025
1022
1024
1023
1026
मंडल/ तेहमिल/ तालुक निलगिरी जिला:बालेश्वर
1 ) ईश्वरपुर 559
686 GI /2012-14
2587
3 4 5 00 05 49 00 16 87 00 01 93 00 00 34 00 06 50 00 09 70 00 07 64 00 00 10 00 01 71 00 07 59 00 01 35 00 04 24 00 06 49 00 11 89 00 00 58 00 04 60 00 01 80 00 00 17 00 07 58 00 02 70 00 11 24 00 02 55 00 00 52 00 16 53 00 15 58 00 00 10 00 14 59 00 00 17 00 01 52 00 01 94 00 07 79 00 06 65 00 01 74 00 04 32 00 04 36 00 08 93 00 08 04 00 00 77 00 05 16 00 07 25 00 03 02 00 07 38 राज्य: ओडिशा 00 02 88
2588
[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2 3 4 5
1 ) ईश्वरपुर (निग्नर) 00 06 04
568
00 11 03
573
00 01 07
576
00 03 14
578
00 02 06
577
00 15 05
579
537 00 13 22
00 00 31
15
00 (00) 32
580
00 00
2 ) चिंतामणिपुर 176
00 00 10
187
00 (K) 19
190
00 01 83
191
487 00 03 41
00 02 73
488
00 01 17
489
00 06 51
491
492 00 05 00
00 11 74
411
414 00 10 58
00 07 89
413
00 11 13
404
396 00 12 99
00 05 94
397
00 10 11
386
1562 00 05 66
3 ) कांडागग्डी
00 18 07
1542
1540 00 00 10
00 02 17
1541
1531 00 02 99
00 04 13
1530
00 00 10
1528
1527 00 05 12
1526 00 05 58
00 06 53
1525
00 00 10
1514
00 04 52
1515
1524 00 00 66
00 04 80
2415
00 07 41
2416
2426 00 01 13
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2589
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2
3 4 5
3 ) कांडागरडी (निरंतर) 2434 00 05 53
2425 00 00 67
2435 00 02 81
2436 00 00 48
1474 00 04 23
1475 00 00 410
1473 00 03 32
1472 00 07 00
1471 00 02 68
1470 00 08 54
1442 00 04 05
1443 00 01 109
1444 00 00 81
1445 00 00 10
1373 00 07 38
1374 00 00 69
1379 00 04 04
1380 00 03 19
1381 00 07 27
1382 00 04 95
1383 00 02 69
1384 00 00 76
4 ) कन्हुपुर 711 00 14 57
712 00 00 10
710 00 05 69
713 00 09 20
714 00 08 25
663 00 06 19
661 00 09 76
660 00 05 41
643 00 06 96
642 00 16 38
641 00 02 21
469 00 03 17
468 00 03 86
470 00 04 65
471 00 00 28
446 90 01 87
437 00 00 38
441 00 05 50
439 00 01 22
420 00 04 86
2590
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1
2
4 ) कन्हुपुर (निग्नर ) 419
394
411
405
404
398
5 ) कोलिगडी 817
816
815
595
562
561
560
555
450
447
436
440
439
438
6 ) हुंटापुर 19
7 ) अस्तीआ 290
291
292
327
298
299
300
302
301
325
311
312
315
314
313
213
35
57
99
64
98
5
3
4
00 02 02 00 08 64 00 14 58 00 15 70 00 02 35 00 00 10 00 02 32 00 14 78 00 25 23 00 11 18 00 09 12 00 07 86 00 04 10 00 01 37 00 08 42 00 08 54 00 00 38 00 04 34 00 00 55 00 08 79 00 00 42 00 01 91 00 00 10 00 00 12 00 08 38 00 04 55 00 00 10 00 01 36 00 00 73 00 03 58 00 00 51 00 00 10 00 02 73 00 00 64 00 10 88 00 13 24 00 05 06 00 00 71 00 09 03 00 20 22 00 01 24 00 25 01
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2591
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1 2
3 4 5
7 ) अस्तीआ (निग्नर) 97 00 00 10
107 00 18 55
109 00 00 10
121 00 04 30
120 00 03 53
119 00 45
116 00 04 34
115 00 20 30
मंडल/ तेहमिल/ तालुक: खैग जिला बालेश्वर गज्य ओडिशा
1 ) खिग्पदा 110 00 00 10
109 00 01 17
108 00 02 25
10/ 00 00 44
102 00 01 17
1 00 00 23
58 00 06 65
59 00 104 50
60 00 00 10
66 00 00 88
67 00 05 31
68 00 02 bi
69 00 00 27
70 00 08 39
57 00 00 10
72 00 00 39
56 00 06 06
52 00 01 18
51 00 19 26
45 00 06 36
44 00 07 51
37 00 00 10
36 00 06 12
31 00 02 40
30 00 34 65
6 00 11
51
5 00 07 52
2 ) ग्फाएतपुर 1092 00 00 15
1038 00 05 31
3 ) दुर्गापुर 62 00 02 54
59 00 04 89
64 00 00 10
56 00 00 83
57 00 01 71
[Part II--Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2592
2
54
3) दुर्गापुर (निरंतर)
46
43
45
12
15
14
17
5
4
3
10
00
00
69
00
02
15
07
00
37
06
00
60
00
10
90
00
23
06
00
01
14
00
11
[फासं. एल.- 14014/13/2011- जी.पी. ] ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th March , 2012
S. O. 1075.- Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 727 dated 28th Feburary , 2011 , read with their notification number S.O. 2740 ( E ) dated 28th November, 2011 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada-Basudebpur -Howrah gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited by M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 20th October, 2011;
And whereas , no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;
And whereas , Government of India , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , have decided to acquire the Right of User therein;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declare that the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, free from all encumbrances .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2593
Schedule
Mandal / Tehsil / Taluk: Soro
District: Baleshwar
Village
State: Orissa
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
2
1 Bhatapada
19
15
9
2 ) Banaparia
16.16
19:23
3 Kurunia
1349
1347
1348
1342
1352
1353
1355
1356
1357
1324
1358
1323
1127
1126
1125
4 ) Kolatha
9/11
8/10
17:20
18/21
5 ) Bhansikharji
114
117
510
Area to be acquired for RoU
Hec
Are
C-Are
3
+
5
00
91
00
04
07
00
07
02
00
03
40
00
10
(01)
06
91
04
00
79
00
00
22
00
03
82.
00
11
63
17
00
78
00
06
30
00
08
13
00
18
00
00
17
01
00
12
18
00
00
10
(09
00
83
00
41
00
00
10
06
(01
00
00
)א(
06
12
00
04
37
00
00
50
81
00
17
93
00
00
17
00
02
34
00
05
15
00
00
12
00
19
86
00
07
23
00
04
20
()( )
00
10
00
04
72
00
02
48
00
35 2594
[ Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
1 2 3 5
5) th 3/7 00 06
:א 00 76
(1)
6 ) NJiga 1858 00 98
1850 00 02
()() 08 30
00 34
1981 (00 11
1855 00 US
00 03
1000 14 زاده
1835 (i) 08
18: 1 (11) 91
(11)
1832 00 10 19
129 00 00
00
איא (10 Su 03
18
111 (01 こ 19
Sauasankica 000
לא 10
782 00 05
00 10
00 52
05
00
199 (11) 06 51
(11) 75
כאא 00
51,7 00 04 81
00 10 15
こり (11
00 17 19
::: 107 99
(00
558 00 03 66
00 10 19
8 ) Chaidima 00 12 23
00 02 68
( 1) 21 15
00 00 69
199 00 10 02
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 1933
8: Chahalíma
584
Balipur
514
503
497
261
244
246
61 Champo
62
63
68
69
7()
71
53
50
51
48
40
39
144
147
148
150
163
165
168
170
172
1 Angul
1492
1494
1495
1504
1788
1789
1790
1791
1802
1861
1856
1852
א
4
14
94
06
G)
61
9.4
11
23
80
87
02
18
00
13
68
00
15
99
(11)
96
00
02
55
16
(1)
10
18
11
15
11
05
14
06
05
06
( (1
10
51
00
00
46
100
02
()()
103
02
00
00
11
12
05
(1)
17
06
00
01
67
00
00
10 536
[ Part II- Sec . 3 (ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2081
1916
1944
1948
1947
1945
1955
1946
857
856
1957
854
853
852
855
850
851
848
36
Mantri
35
34
26
23
22
17
374
380
981
1010
1011
1009
1008
1007
1006
1019
1025
1022
1024
1023
1026
5
3
49
it
50
20
N.
10
71
00
59
100
35
00
24
49
60
89
00
58
00
!
60
100
80
00
17
۱۳
000
58
70
00
24
11
() ( )
55
00
( 1)
52
00
53
00
58
00
00
10
00
14
59
00
17
00
00
01
52
00
94
01
00
79
07
00
65
(0)
06
74
00
01
32
04
00
36
00
04
93
08
00
04
08
00
77
00
00
05
16
00
25
07
00
02
03
00
07
38
00
State: Orissa
District: Baleshwar
Mandal/ Tehsil / Taluk: Nilagiri
559
1 ) Iswarpur
02
88
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1) kwarpont
568
573
576
578
577
579
537
15
580
176 2 ) Chintamanipur
187
190
191
487
488
489
491
492
411
414
413
404
396
397
386
1562 3 ) Kandagardi
1542
1540
1541
1531
1530
1528
1527
1526
1525
1514
1515
1524
2415
2416
2426
2597
3
(1.)
::
00
03
100
117
14
Ot
05
(1)
22
()
31
00
32
(01)
00
00
10
00
49
00
83
00
41
00
73
00
47
00
51
00
000
00
11
74
00
10
58
00
89
00 13
00
に
94
05
00
00
11
00
66
00
18
00
00
00
00 112 بالي
00 104 13
00 00 10
00
05
12
00
05
58
00
06
53
00
00
10
04
52
00
00
00
00
04
30
00
107
00
13
01 2598
[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2
1
2434
Kandagarki Contd)
2425
2435
2436
1474
1475
1473
1472
1471
1470
1442
1443
1444
1445
1373
1374
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
711
4 anhupur
712
710
713
714
663
661
660
643
642
641
469
468
470
471
446
437
441
439
420 4
5
3
05
53
00
67
00
81
00
48
00
23
00
40
100
00
32
00
00 00
68
00
54
אוז
00
05
(00
111
09
00
81
00
10
00
00
38
00 69
04
00
19
00
00 27
95
00
00 69
00 76
57
00
10
00
69
00
20
00
25
00
19
00
106
76
109
00
00 05 41
96
06
00
00
16
38
21
00
02
03
17
00
00 03 86
65
04
00
28
00
00
01
87
20
00
38
00
50
05
00
00
01
86
04
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2599
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
4 Kachupar tt ontd
419
594
411
405
404
308
817 5 ) Koligadi
816
815
595
562
561
560
555
450
447
436
440
439
438
19 6 ) Huntapoor
7 ) Astia
290
291
292
327
298
299
300
302
301
325
311
312
315
314
313
213
35
57
99
64
98 3
57
12
61
00
00
11
58
70
(01)
00
10
00
00
23
01
11
18
00
00
86
00
10
37
00
00
08
42
00
5.1
00
00
38
00
04
34
(0)
00
55
00
08
79
00
00
42
00
01
91
00
00
10
00
00
12
08
00
38
00
04
55
00
00
10
00
36
00
00
73
00
03
58
00
00
51
00
00
10
00
02
73
00
00
64
00
10
88
00
13
24
00
05
00
00
71
00
09
03
00
20
22
00
01
24
25
00
01 [ Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2600
97 Astra Contd)
107
109
121
120
119
116
115
5
3
10
(00
00
55
00
18
10
00
(0 )
(0.1
(10)
53
00
03
15
(0)
い
34
00
30
20
()()
State: Orissa
District: Baleshwar
Mandal / Tehsil /Taluk : Khaira
110
1 ) Khirapada
108
107
102
20
67
68
(1)
57
72
56
52
51
45
44
36
30
6
5
1092
2 ) Rafaetpur
1038
62
3 ) Durgapur
59
64
56
57 (0)
17
00
(11
25
02
00
44
00
00
00
00
00
06
65
00
01
50
(0)
10
00
(1)
00
88
00
31
00
05
61
00
27
00
(00
39
08
(X)
00
00
00
00
06
00
18
00
01
26
00
19
06
36
(K)
51
00
07
10
00
00
12
06
00
02
00
65
00
34
51
00
11
00
07
15
(00
00
31
05
00
54
02
00
89
00
04
(X)
(01)
83
(0)
00
(00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2601
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2 3 ) Durgapur( Contd)
54
46
43
45
12
15
14
17
4
3
5 00
00
10
69
00
02
00
07
15
00
06
37
00
10
60
00
23
90
00
01
06
14
00
11
[F. No. 1.- 1-4014/ 13/2011 -GP. ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 13 मार्च , 2012
का. आ. 1076.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ. 2740 (अ) तारीख 28 नवंबर , 2011 के साथ पठित अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ . 726 तारीख 28 फरवरी , 2011 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में, मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- बासुदेबपुर - हावडा गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 15 सितंबर , 2011 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
और, पाइपलाइन बिछाने के सम्बन्ध में , जनता की ओर से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है;
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और, भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः , अब, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
2602
[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
अनुसूची
जिला:जाजपुर मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: व्यासनगर
राज्य:ओडिशा
आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने
सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं
गाँव का नाम
2 1
79
1) खिरो
21
18
17
14
12
31
11
3
6
525
2) सरसुदा
526
527
533
534
532
549
547
548
552
565
563
749
751
752
750
760
758
757
762
763
764
1135
1134
1139
1140
1147
के लिए क्षेतफल
सि.एयर हेक्टेयर एयर
4
5 3
53
00
13
07
06
00
94 08
00
10
00
00
88 00
00
40 00 04
10
00
00
54
07
00
07
01
00
00
80
00
02
13
00
01
06
00
55 01
00
39 07
00
60
02
00
07
09
00
60
02
00
67
03
00
33
06
00
24
00
00
09 00
07
50
00
00
49
02
00
73 00
01
80
03
00
20
01
00
36 00
00
79
06
00
00
36 00
34
02
00
02
54 00
36
00
00
60
07
00
43
00
00
69 00
05
22
03
00
06
99 00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2603
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1 2
2 ) सरसुदा (निरंतर) 1153
1158
1157
1156
1155
1108
1184
1186
1187
1189
1190
1204
1203
1224
1222
1464
1463
मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: भंडारी पोखरी जिला:भद्रक
1) बंदालो 1923
2008
2007
2006
1996
2002
1998
2001
1999
2 ) देउपदा 1818
1817
1816
1814
1815
1806
1805
1794
1793
1789
1788
1747
1716
1709
1707
1694
686 GI/ 2012-16
3 4 5 00 00 12 00 00 25 00 01 67 00 04 09 00 12 00 00 00 95 00 04 70 00 02 70 00 03 97 00 00 10 00 13 44 00 00 37 00 00 77 00 00 13 00 16 68 00 10 78 00 13 99 राज्य ओडिशा 00 00 10 00 03 01 00 10 02 00 18 51 00 00 86 00 07 09 00 01 04 00 02 30 00 06 46 00 01 08 00 11 86 00 03 17 00 00 10 00 01 84 00 00 16 00 10 16 00 12 04 00 00 78 00 08 75 00 04 90 00 04 03 00 01 27 00 03 92 00 03 54 00 00 51
2604
[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
1 2 3 4 5
1695 00 09 62
2 ) देउपदा (निरंतर)
1698 00 02 78
1696 00 00 46
1599 00 06 08
1596 00 04 80
1598 00 00 22
1586 00 01 97
1561 00 06 41
1511 00 06 54
1552 00 11 44
1553 00 04 69
618 00 16 38
617 00 00 88
627 00 13 68
631 00 03 95
632 00 05 88
633 00 02 75
637 00 00 78
640 00 04 95
726 00 00 02
721 00 13 97
720 00 08 27
00 03 34
711
708 00 04 61
709 00 03 33
705 00 08 34
706 00 02 09
778 00 08 37
779 00 07 40
781 00 33 25
463 00 02 86
3 ) मंदर गाडीआ
465 00 11 67
458 00 09 39
00 07 60
464
471 00 05 31
473 00 01 14
638 00 12 14
4 ) अगेइ बेहेरा
00 00 10
628
637 00 04 52
636 00 03 05
635 00 03 28
632 00 01 04
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2605
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27, 1933
1
2 3 4
5
4 ) अगेइ वेहेरा (निरंतर) 633 00 09 93
634 00 00 37
606 00 17 61
640 00 03 60
605 00 01 95
5 ) सनासासन 736 00 00 10
739 00 00 57
740 00 08 25
742 00 00 63
744 00 06 77
745 00 03 55
675 00 10 28
674 00 01 43
673 00 06 13
664 00 02 97
662 00 00 47
630 00 00 94
656 00 17 86
653 00 00 10
654 00 00 52
655 00 07 11
648 00 02 39
639 00 00 54
6 ) मंतागारिया 552 00 09 31
260 00 02 10
551 00 12 55
261 00 01 88
543 00 09 39
542 00 02 27
541 00 10 12
540 00 03 28
539 00 02 71
538 00 02 59
537 00 03 08
532 00 07 29
536 00 03 70
533 00 03 02
534 00 04 83
535 00 01 85
520 00 00 21
521 00 13 07
495 00 00 50
2606
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2 1
516
6 ) मंतागारिया (निरंतर)
497
500
501
502
503
488
504
476
477
469
470
452
[Part II-Sec . 3( ii) ]
3
4
5
29
00
12
72
00
11
21
00
00
94
02
00
08
47
00
64
09
00
95
00
04
07
27
00
00
99
18
86
00
02
00
09
45
00 04
38
00
15
00
राज्य:ओडिशा
जिला:भद्रक
मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: बंत
00 07 11
1) गंडगरा 253
255 00 00 10
00 03 03
252
251 00 03 59
250 00 00 65
249 00 03 39
247 00 01 15
00 07 36
221
222 00 01 09
219 00 01 27
00 04 85
218
217 00 03 87
216 00 04 10
83 00 01 96
85 00 04 12
00 04 52
84
46 00 08 60
87 00 00 12
88 00 01 19
111 00 02 99
112 00 02 25
137 00 00 65
113 00 03 83
136 00 01 12
115 00 00 29
00 05 39
114
00 02 03
135
00 03 04
133
134 00 01 21
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
2607
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2 3
4 5
1 ) गंडगरा (निरंतर) 142 00 02 28
140 00 00
10
141 00 00 30
132 00 01 44
129 00 00 68
131 00 01 47
143 00 02 19
2 ) गोबिंदपुर 714 00 02
10
715 00 02 77
713 00 08 86
717 00 02
40
740 00 10 66
743 00 07
14
741 00
00 20
744 00 06
06
745 00 00 70
701 00 02
31
752 00 05
87
753 00 05 14
754 00 01 07
699 00 00
10
755 00 16
46
759 00 01 63
645 00 02 77
648 00 10
90
649 00 10 07
650 00 10
18
653 00 08 33
654 00 06 48
655 00 03
86
656 00 04 56
501 00 12 26
503 00 02
53
502 00 09 66
595 00 00 10
575 00 05
09
574 00 02
78
506 00 01 32
573 00 01 64
572 00 01
20
509 00 00 69
512 00 00 37
[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2608
3 4 5
2
1
00 01 36
554
2 ) गोबिंदपुर (निरंतर) 00 06 11
555
00 09 23
552
00 01 78
553
00 18 88
543
00 09 11
540
00 00 10
544
00 03 04
545
00 07 20
539
00 00 10
538
00 11 43
534
00 00 25
535
00 16 54
536
00 01 07
1759
3 ) अधिआ 00 03 82
1736
00 14 79
1739 44
00 23
1738
00 01 70
1388
00 06 68
1389
00 02 06
1392
00 05 35
1390
00 07 39
1391
00 11 63
1333
00 05 68
1332
00 00 10
1403
00 06 06
1329
00 00 10
1327
00 07 98
1328
00 03 03
1335
02 69
00
1324
00 11 64
1323
00 00 23
1336
00 05 15
1337
00 10 67
1322
00 00 64
1338
00 12 63
1291
00 06 28
1292
00 08 87
1284
00 07 27
1288
00 05 81
1287
00 05 22
1286
00 01 12
1277
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
1
2
3 ) अधिआ (निरंतर)
1285
1278
1282
1279
1274
1273
1272
1268
1280
1271
1270
1269
1246
1241
1243
1242
1199
320
4 ) रघुनाथपुर
315
316
311
313
263
309
264
265
266
271
267
269
268
249
247
129
131
240
241
133
132
242
244
134
2609
3
4
5
00
04
14
00
05
70
00
00
47
00
12
23
00
00
10
00 02
46
00
05
69
10
00 00
14
00
05
98
00
02
58
00
10
31
00
01
79
00
12
88
00
03
91
00
12
84
00
04
26
00
00
53
00 08
39
00
10
47
00
06
19
00
00
13
00
12
99
00
00
32
00
14
87
00
00
11
00
08
31
00
00
97
00
11
73
00
03
64
00
05
52
00
02
04
00 01
37
00
05
82
00
01
28
00
00
10
00
01
25
00
01
58
00
01
81
00
00
43
00
00
89
00
10
03 [Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2610
2
1
147
4 ) रघुनाथपुर (निरंतर)
135
81
82
77
79
83
78
50
54
58
51
53
52
39
40
38
37
35
36
802
5 ) तुंडा
803
805
806
800
801
498
497
495
441
440
439
438
442
443
444
437
445
490
446
448
449
5
4
3
25 00
00
58 01
00
22 10
00
44 01
00
09 02
00
75 09
00
21 00
00
76
05
00
05 06
00
88
21
00
10
00
00
40
13
00
16
02
00
29
11
00
77 00
04
28
04
00
98
09
00
63
02
00
41
12
00
25
03
00
09
06
00
38
12
00
27
00
00
76
03
00
10
00
00
67
02
00
11
23
00
66
02
00
91
01
00
83
05
00
24
02
00
92
02
00
49
03
00
18
02
00
19
16
00
03
05
00
60
00
00
55
07
00
35
05
00
15
01
00
03
10
00
90
07
00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2611
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2
5 ) तुंडा (निरंतर) 466
468
485
292
470
471
235
234
233
232
228
226
213
231
230
216
217
206
205
207
204
203
) बेलदा 1017
1031
589
590
588
581
582
587
586
585
583
557
584
554
551
553
552
542
540
541
686 G1 /2012-17
3 4 5 00 09 46 00 11 26 00 03 06 00 00 45 00 09 10 00 09 57 00 02 16 00 03 86 00 02 35 00 03 14 00 00 10 00 00 24 00 01 50 00 09 24 00 00 13 00 12 87 00 04 80 00 09 59 00 00 54 00 15 56 00 01 41 00 02 62 00 00 10 00 09 27 00 02 21 00 01 70 00 04 41 00 00 70 00 08 78 00 04 28 00 00 70 00 01 84 00 10 45 00 00 54 00 06 13 00 11 79 00 10 22 00 03 64 00 05 14 00 10 24 00 00 48 00 06 83
2612
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1 2
6 ) बेलदा (निरंतर) 539
7 ) कंतिआ 1868
1870
1881
1880
1879
2541
2542
2545
2529
2527
2526
2528
2525
2522
2524
2515
2516
2517
2511
2510
2508
2509
2505
2498
2499
2497
2491
2490
2477
8 ) गणीजंगा 2187
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2210
2209
2207
2208
2128
2126
2124
2120
[ Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)]
3 4 5 00 02 15 00 00 23 00 01 47 00 01 42 00 01 09 00 01 34 00 05 82 00 00 98 00 29 55 00 08 36 00 03 91 00 05 83 00 01 60 00 02 53 00 03 25 00 11 56 00 00 23 00 03 87 00 02 72 00 20 00 00 01 16 00 00 95 00 08 25 00 02 37 00 01 62 00 04 33 00 00 10 00 02 14 00 08 85 00 02 04 00 00 28 00 01 73 00 02 14 00 05 16 00 01 57 00 06 70 00 01 83 00 02 36 00 04 65 00 ΟΙ 07 00 00 10 00 10 21 00 10 51 00 16 75
[फा सं. एल.-14014/12/2011-जी.पी .] ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2613 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
New Delhi , the 13th March , 2012
S. O. 1076. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 726 dated 28th Feburary , 2011 , read with their notification number S.O. 2740 ( E ) dated 28th November , 2011 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada - Basudebpur - Howrah gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M /s Reliance Industries Limited by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country;
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on orbefore 15th September, 2011 ;
And whereas , no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;
And whereas , Government of India , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , have decided to acquire the Right of Usertherein;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby declare that the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , free from all encumbrances .
Schedule
Mandal/Tehsii /Taluk : Vyasanagar
District: Jajapur
State:Orissa
Village
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
Area to be acquired for RoU
Hec
Are
C-Are
1
2
3
4
5
1 ) Khiro
79
00
13
53
21
06
00
07
18
00
08
94
17
00
00
10
14
00
00
88
12
00
04
40
31
00
00
10
11
00
07
54
3
00
07
01
6
00
00
80 [Part II -Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2614
2
2 ) Sarasuda 525
526
527
533
534
532
549
547
548
552
565
563
749
751
752
750
760
758
757
762
763
764
1135
1134
1139
1140
1147
1153
1158
1157
1156
1155
1108
1184
1186
1187
1189
1190
1204
1203
1224
1222
1464
1463
Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Bhandari Pokhari District: Bhadrak
1 ) Bandalo 1923
2008
2007
2006
1996
2002
1998
2001
1999
5 3
4
00 02 13 00 06 01 00 01 55 00 07 39 00 02 60 00 09 07 00 02 60 00 03 67 00 06 33 00 00 24 00 07 09 00 00 50 00 02 49 00 01 73 00 03 80 00 01 20 00 00 36 00 06 79 00 00 36 00 02 34 00 02 54 00 00 36 00 07 60 00 00 43 00 05 69 00 03 22 00 06 99 00 00 12 00 00 25 00 01 67 00 04 09 00 12 00 00 00 95 00 04 70 00 02 70 00 03 97 00 00 10 00 13 44 00 00 37 00 00 77 00 00 13 00 16 68 00 10 78 00 13 99 State:Orissa 00 00 10 00 03 01 00 10 02 00 18 51 00 00 86 00 07 09 00 01 04 00 02 30 00 06 46
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012. फाल्गुन 27. 1933
2
2 ) Deopada
1818
1817
1816
1814
1815
1806
1805
1794
1793
1789
1788
1747
1716
1709
1707
1694
1695
1698
1696
1599
1596
1598
1586
1561
1511
1552
1553
618
617
627
631
632
633
637
640
726
721
720
711
708
709
705
706
778
779
781
463
3 ) Mandararia
465
458
464
471
473
2615
3
4
5
00
01
08
00
11
86
00
03
17
00
00
10
00
01
84
00
00
16
00
10
16
00
12
04
00
00
78
00
08
75
00
04
90
00
04
03
00
01
27
03
00
92
00
03
54
00
00
51
00
09
62
00
02
78
00
00
46
06
00
08
00
04
80
00
00
22
00
01
97
00
06
41
00
06
54
00
11
44
00
04
69
00
16
38
00
00
88
00
13
68
00
03
95
00
05
88
00
02
75
00
00
78
00
04
95
00
00
02
00
13
97
00
08
27
00
03
34
00
04
61
00
03
33
00
08
34
00
02
09
00
08
37
00
07
40
00
33
25
00
02
86
00
11
67
00
09
39
00
07
60
00
05
31
00
01
14 2616
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2
4 ) Ageibehera 638
628
637
636
635
632
633
634
606
640
605
5 ) Sanasasan 736
739
740
742
744
745
675
674
673
664
662
630
656
653
654
655
648
639
6 ) Mantagaria 552
260
551
261
543
542
541
540
539
538
537
532
536
533
534
535
520
521
495
[Part II--Sec. 3 (ii ) ]
3
4
5
00 12 14
00 00 10
00 04 52
00 03 05
00 03 28
00 01 04
00 09 93
00 00 37
00 17 61
00 03 60
00 01 95
00 00 10
00 00 57
00 08 25
00 00 63
00 06 77
00 03 55
00 10 28
00 01 43
00 06 13
00 02 97
00 00 47
00 00 94
00 17 86
00 00 10
00 00 52
00 07 11
30 02 39
00 00 54
00 09 31
00 02 10
00 12 55
00 01 88
00 09 39
00 02 27
00 10 12
00 03 28
00 02 71
00 02 59
00 03 08
00 07 29
00 03 70
00 03 02
00 04 83
00 01 85
00 00 21
00 13 07
00 00 50
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2
6) Mantagaria (Contd)
$16
497
500
501
502
503
488
504
476
477
469
470
452
Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk:Bant
2617
3
4
5
00
12
29
00
11
72
00
00
21
00
02
94
00
08
47
00
09
64
00
04
95
00
07
27
00
18
99
00
02
86
00
09
45
00
04
38
00
00
15
District: Bhadrak
1) Gandagara
253
255
252
251
250
249
247
221
222
219
218
217
216
83
85
84
46
87
88
111
112
137
113
136
115
114
135
133
134
State:Orissa
00
07
11
00
00
10
00
03
03
00
03
59
00
00
65
00
03
39
00
01
15
00
07
36
00
01
09
00
01
27
00
04
85
00
03
87
00
04
10
00
01
96
00
04
12
00
04
52
00
08
60
00
00
12
00
01
19
00
02
99
00
02
25
00
00
65
00
03
83
00
01
12
00
00
29
00
05
39
00
02
03
00
03
04
00
01
21 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2618
3 5
2
00 02 28
1) Gandagara (Contd) 142
140 00 00 10
141 00 00 30
132 00 01 44
129 00 00 68
131 00 01 47
143 00 02 19
714 00 02 10
2 ) Gobindapur
715 00 02 77
713 00 08 86
717 00 02 40
740 00 10 66
743 00 07 14
741 00 00 20
744 00 06 06
745 00 00 70
701 00 02 31
752 00 05 87
753 00 05 14
754 00 01 07
699 00 00 10
755 00 16 46
759 00 01 63
645 00 02 77
648 00 10 90
649 00 10 07
650 00 10 18
653 00 08 33
654 00 06 48
655 00 03 86
656 00 04 56
501 00 12 26
503 00 02 53
502 00 09 66
595 00 00 10
575 00 05 09
574 00 02 78
506 00 01 32
573 00 01 64
572 00 01 20
509 00 00 69
512 00 00 37
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2619
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2
2) Gobindapur (Contd) 554
555
552
553
543
540
544
545
539
538
534
535
536
3 ) Andhia 1759
1736
1739
1738
1388
1389
1392
1390
1391
1333
1332
1403
1329
1327
1328
1335
1324
1323
1336
1337
1322
1338
1291
1292
1284
1288
1287
1286
1277
686 GI/ 2012-18
3 4 5 00 01 36 00 06 11 00 09 23 00 01 78 00 18 88 00 09 11 00 00 10 00 03 04 00 07 20 00 00 10 00 11 43 00 00 25 00 16 54 00 01 07 00 03 82 00 14 79 00 23 44 00 01 70 00 06 68 00 02 06 00 05 35 00 07 39 00 11 63 00 05 68 00 00 10 00 06 06 00 00 10 00 07 98 00 03 03 00 02 69 00 11 64 00 00 23 00 05 15 00 10 67 00 00 64 00 12 63 00 06 28 00 08 87 00 07 27 00 05 81 00 05 22 00 01 12
2620
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1 2
3 ) Andhia(Contd) 1285
1278
1282
1279
1274
1273
1272
1268
1280
1271
1270
1269
1246
1241
1243
1242
1199
4 ) Raghunathpur 320
315
316
311
313
263
309
264
265
266
271
267
269
268
249
247
129
131
240
241
133
132
242
244
134
[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]
3 4 5 00 04 14 00 05 70 00 00 47 00 12 23 00 00 10 00 02 46 00 05 69 00 00 10 00 00 14 00 05 98 00 02 58 00 10 31 00 01 79 00 12 88 00 03 91 00 12 84 00 04 26 00 00 53 00 08 39 00 10 47 00 06 19 00 00 13 00 12 99 00 00 32 00 14 87 00 00 11 00 08 31 00 00 97 00 11 73 00 03 64 00 05 52 00 02 04 00 01 37 00 05 82 00 01 28 00 00 10 00 01 25 00 01 58 00 01 81 00 00 43 00 00 89 00 10 03
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2621
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1 2 3 4 5
4) Raghunathpur (Contd) 147 00 00 25
135 00 01 58
81 00 10 22
82 00 01 44
77 00 02 09
79 00 09 75
83 00 00 21
78 00 05 76
50 00 06 05
54 00 21 88
58 00 00 10
51 00 13 40
53 00 02 16
52 00 11 29
39 00 04 77
40 00 04 28
38 00 09 98
37 00 02 63
35 00 12 41
36 00 03 25
5 ) Tunda 802 00 06 09
803 00 12 38
805 00 00 27
806 00 03 76
800 00 00 10
801 00 02 67
498 00 23 11
497 02 66
495 60 01 91
441 00 05 83
440 00 02 24
439 00 02 92
438 00 03 49
442 00 02 18
443 00 16 19
444 00 05 03
437 00 00 60
445 00 07 55
490 00 05 35
446 00 01 15
448 00 10 03
449 00 07 90
2622
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1 2
5) Tunda(Contd) 466
468
485
292
470
471
235
234
233
232
228
226
213
231
230
216
217
206
205
207
204
203
6 ) Belada 1017
1031
589
590
588
581
582
587
586
585
583
557
584
554
551
553
552
542
540
541
[ Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]
3 4 5 00 09 46 00 11 26 00 03 06 00 00 45 00 09 10 00 09 57 00 02 16 00 03 86 00 02 35 00 03 14 00 00 10 00 00 24 00 01 50 00 09 24 00 00 13 00 12 87 00 04 80 00 09 59 00 00 54 00 15 56 00 01 41 00 02 62 00 00 10 00 09 27 00 02 21 00 01 70 00 04 41 00 00 70 00 08 78 00 04 28 00 00 70 00 01 84 00 10 45 00 00 54 00 06 13 00 11 79 00 10 22 00 03 64 00 05 14 00 10 24 00 00 48 00 06 83
[भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2623
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2 3 4 5
6) Belada (Contd) 539 00 02 15
7 ) Kantia 1868 00 00 23
1870 00 01 47
1881 00 01 42
1880 00 01 09
1879 00 01 34
2541 00 05 82
2542 00 00 98
2545 00 29 55
2529 00 08 36
2527 00 03 91
2526 00 05 83
2528 00 01 60
2525 00 02 53
2522 00 03 25
2524 00 11 56
2515 00 00 23
2516 00 03 87
2517 00 02 72
2511 00 20 00
2510 00 01 16
2508 00 00 95
2509 00 08 25
2505 00 02 37
2498 00 01 62
2499 00 04 33
2497 00 00 10
2491 00 02 14
2490 00 08 85
2477 00 02 04
8 ) Ganijanga 2187 00 00 28
2202 00 01 73
2203 00 02 14
2204 00 05 16
2205 00 01 57
2206 00 06 70
2210 00 01 83
2209 00 02 36
2207 00 04 65
2208 00 01 07
2128 00 00 10
2126 00 10 21
2624
[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
4
3
5
2
1
00
10
51
2124
8) Ganijanga (Contd)
75
2120
00
16
[F. No. L- 14014/12/2011 -GP. ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 13 मार्च , 2012
का. आ. 1077. -भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ . 731 तारीख 21.02.2011 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , तमिलनाडु में तिरूतन्नी के पास विजयवाडा-नैलुर - चैन्नई पाइपलाइन के टर्मिनल प्वाइंट से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा चैन्नई -बंगलौर मंगलौर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 06 सितम्बर, 2011 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;
और, पाइपलाइन विछाने के संबंध में, जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्नात कर दिया गया,
और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और, भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः , अव, भारत सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के वजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2625
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
अनुसूची
जिला:हासन
तालुक: हासन
गाँव का नाम
राज्य:कर्नाटक
सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं.
1
120 1 ) मुत्तत्ती
121
122
आर- ओ - यू.अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेतफल
हेक्टेयर एयर सि-एयर 2
3
4
5
01
61
04
01
33
53
00
86
83
[फा सं. एल.- 14014/81/2010-जी.पी. ] ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th March, 2012
S. O. 1077. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , number S.O. 731 dated 21-02-2011 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Chennai - Bangalore- Mangalore gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from terminal point of Vijayawada -Nellore -Chennai pipeline near Tiruttani in TamilNadu by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to consumers in various parts of the country:
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 06th September, 2011;
And whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Government of India ;
And whereas , Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule . appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India , vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in M/ sRelogistics Infrastructure Limited, free from all encumbrances .
2626
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ]
Schedule
District: Hassan
Taluk : Hassan
Village
State: Karnataka
Area to be acquired for RoU
Survey No./Sub-Division No.
1
120 1 ) Muthathi
121
122 2
Are 4
Hec 3
C-Are 5
01
61
04
53
33
01
00
86
83
[F. No. L - 14014/81/2010-GP. ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 13 मार्च, 2012
का. आ. 1078.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ . 729. तारीख 28 फरवरी , 2011 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , मैसर्स रिलाएंस इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मेसर्स रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा वासुदेवपुर- हावडा गैस पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और , उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 14 जनवरी , 2012 को अथवा उमगे पूर्व उपलब्ध कग दी गई थीं ;
और, पाइपलाइन विछाने के सम्वन्ध में, जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्नात कर दिया गया;
और. मक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्न अधिनियम की धाग 6 की उप- धाग ( 1 ) के अधीन 'भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और, भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
अतः, अव. भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप -धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना में मंलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन विछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है :
और, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख मे भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए . मभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैमर्म रिलोजिस्टिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
{ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2627
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
अनुसूची
मंडल/ तेहमिल/ तालुक: इग्रा । जिला:मेदिनीपुर
गाँव का नाम सर्वे सं/ सब डिविजन सं .
1 2
18
6
5
4
2) विलवर 397
396
395
399
489
488
487
485
483
484
456
3 ) वाया 7
6
5
37
4) वेनचकरी 851
852
1097
858
1096
857
861
862
863
866
864
865
867
974
973
972
1087
976
686 GI/2012-19
राज्य:पश्चिम बंगाल
आर.ओ.यू.अर्जित करने
के लिए क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर सि.एयर
3 4 5
00 11 04
00 00 49
00 04 71
00 11 97
00 16 59
00 04 65
00 09 18
00 02 19
00 08 18
00 04 62
00 02 96
00 16
00 11 35
00 02 04
00 00 15
00 00 43
00 18 72
00 03 11
00 10 82
00 30 44
00 03 87
00 01 43
00 08 80
00 11 16
00 02 91
00 03 49
00 07 95
00 08 60
00 03 53
00 01 87
00 03 79
00 03 03
00 01 19
00 05 12
00 05 72
00 07 24
00 03 28
2628
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1 2
4 ) वनचकरी (निरंतर) 1088
1089
966
1080
933
929
928
927
5 ) नराहरिपुर 144
137
136
135
138
134
133
132
131
127
128
126
125
124
27
23
20
24
25
19
18
17
15
40
41
42
44
47
46
52
53
55
56
58
[Part 11- Sec . 3 (ii ) ]
3 4 5 00 07 71 00 01 65 00 23 72 00 03 18 00 01 78 00 02 85 00 14 17 00 37 00 00 17 00 16 75 00 03 85 00 02 21 00 00 86 00 03 62 00 02 79 00 03 67 00 04 98 00 07 82 00 02 31 00 05 03 00 03 22 00 00 36 00 00 27 00 01 44 00 04 54 00 00 70 00 03 75 00 00 64 00 11 95 00 00 90 00 01 04 00 18 82 00 01 91 00 07 28 00 03 53 00 15 74 00 00 47 00 10 40 00 10 16 00 09 78 00 04 65 00 07 43
2629
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
3 4 5
2
1
00 00 16
5 ) नगहरिपुर (निरंतर) 59
00 04 35
62
00 01 44
300
6 ) कुदी 00 12 72
289
00 23 70
288
00 00 25
287
00 00 48
284
00 14 42
285
00 24 96
262
00 08 18
263
00 01 92
265
00 03 13
264
00 05 69
259
00 00 10
239
00 18 42
240
00 08 65
241
00 00 87
238
00 10 41
242
00 36 11
236
00 06 74
212
00 01 09
224
00 00 29
213
00 15 82
222
00 4 07
215
00 22 18
216
00 01 36
217
00 00 56
218
00 25 65
199
00 00 22
201
00 22 04
198
00 06 80
197
00 13 53
157
00 11 13
189
00 06 05
188
00 07 37
160
00 00 92
187
00 11 04
166
00 08 26
167
00 00 98
171
00 12 56
170
जिला:मेदिनीपुर राज्य:पश्चिम बंगाल
मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: मोहनपुर 00 95
00
71
1 ) निलपुर 00 05 67
72
2630
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
1
2
1 ) निलपुर (निरंतर)
75
77
74
78
63
62
60
56
48
47
42
41
39
37
36
35
33
32
209
41
2 ) असुरा
40
39
54
38
35
33
32
31
29
30
73
74
35
3 ) संदापुर
37
180
38
39
179
172
174
173
168
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]
3
4
5
00
08
56
00
06
45
00
01
39
00
16
46
00
00
53
13
00
59
00
16
55
00
02
98
00
38
56
00
01
17
00
08
30
00
03
00
00
03
87
00
16
38
00
01
70
00
08
10
00
12
59
00
01
91
00
14
89
00
15
45
00
00
11
00
00
10
00
04
33
00
04
33
00
00
91
00
02
65
00
04
97
00
01
48
00
12
80
00
07
12
00
00
20
00
07
75
00
29
56
03
00
81
00
25 02
00
02
66
00
00
71
00
05
88
00
00
85
00
00
00
09
99
00
00
10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2631
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
1
2 3 4
5
3 ) संदापुर (निरंतर) 171 00 00 38
170 00 04 85
169 00 01 42
175 00 00 10
162 00 14 95
163 00 00 45
161 00 02 25
151 00 13 53
152 00 02 15
153 00 00 10
147 00 04 59
142 00 01 87
145 00 00 99
146 00 02 19
144 00 02 43
134 00 00 80
135 00 05 11
136 00 00 10
139 00 05 75
137 00 01 65
138 00 01 93
129 00 03 41
128 00 26 68
122 00 00 98
121 00 07
58
120 00 00 20
109 00 22 00
1 ) पालुया 288 00 00 54
277 00 00 82
286 00 13 77
284 00 02 15
290 00 06 31
674 00 00
10
291 00 22 66
667 00 04 35
672 00 00 30
668 00 19 88
665 00 10 33
664 00 09 05
663 00 04 04
662 00 00 33
317 00 15 03
2632
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii))
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
3 4 5
1 2
00 15 39
4 ) पालुया (निरंतर) 645
00 02 12
646
00 01 72
644
00 11 65
558
00 00 46
559
00 01 76
560
00 04 64
557
00 04 49
556
00 06 85
551
00 09 68
552
00 01 38
550
00 00 47
3077
5 ) तनुया 00 00 81
3078
00 04 51
3079
00 05 20
3080
00 14 11
3081
00 00 11
3083
00 08 85
3084
00 02 85
3085
00 00 31
3086
00 03 86
3087
00 01 66
6 ) काशिचक 204
00 00 68
190
00 06 71
188
00 03 32
187
00 05 18
56
00 06 22
48
00 01 03
51
00 14 57
50
00 00 51
49
00 02 88
57
00 04 19
58
00 00 70
59
00 06 10
64
00 07 89
72
00 01 38
65
00 02 45
73
00 04 55
71
00 08 70
74
00 03 77
75
00 01 04
77
00 08 34
76
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2633
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2 1
6 ) काशिचक (निरंतर) 79
7 ) मयुरखोला 100
99
97
96
95
474
475
476
744
743
745
741
754
740
755
757
758
759
765
8 ) राजनगर 1256
1255
1254
4
3
5
00 00 90 00 07 54 00 08 84 00 11 66 00 00 62 00 30 27 00 01 97 00 10 06 00 01 27 00 15 51 00 10 65 00 14 63 00 07 21 00 06 03 00 07 63 00 09 55 00 17 99 00 12 18 00 03 24 00 16 56 00 00 10 00 15 25 00 07 07
[फा सं. एल.-14014/2/2011- जी.पी. ] ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th March , 2012
S. O. 1078.- Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 729 dated 28th February, 2011 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada - Basudebpur - Howrah gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M / s Reliance Industries Limitedby M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to the consumers in various parts of the country ;
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on orbefore 14th January , 2012;
And whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;
And whereas , Government of India , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , have decided to acquire the Right of User therein;
2634
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declare that the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule , appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India , vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , free from all encumbrances .
Schedule
Mandal / Tehsil/ Taluk : Egra - I District: Medinipur State:West Bengal
Village Survey No./Sub-Division No. Area to be acquired for RoU
Hec Are C-Are
1 2 3 4 5
1 ) Rayda 18 00 11 04
6 00 00 49
5 00 04 71
4 00 11 97
2) Bilbara 397 00 16 59
396 00 04 65
395 00 09 18
399 00 02 19
489 00 08 18
488 00 04 62
487 00 02 96
485 00 11 16
483 00 11 35
484 00 02 04
456 00 00 15
3 ) Baya 7 00 00 43
6 00 18 72
5 00 03 11
37 00 10 82
4 ) Benachakri 851 00 30 44
852 00 03 87
1097 00 01 43
858 00 08 80
1096 00 11 16
857 00 02 91
861 00 03 49
862 00 07 95
863 00 08 60
866 00 03 53
864 00 01 87
865 00 03 79
867 00 03 03
974 00 01 19
973 00 05 12
972 00 05 72
1087 00 07 24
976 00 03 28
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2635
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
2
4) Benachakri (Contd) 1088
1089
966
1080
933
929
928
927
5 ) Naraharipur 144
137
136
135
138
134
133
132
131
127
128
126
125
124
27
23
20
24
25
19
18
17
15
40
41
42
44
47
46
52
53
55
56
58
686 GI/2012-20
3 4 5 00 07 71 00 01 65 00 23 72 00 03 18 00 01 78 00 02 85 00 14 17 00 11 37 00 00 17 00 16 75 00 03 85 00 02 21 00 00 86 00 03 62 00 02 79 00 03 67 00 04 98 00 07 82 00 02 31 00 05 03 00 03 22 00 00 36 00 00 27 00 01 44 00 04 54 00 00 70 00 03 75 00 00 64 00 11 95 00 00 90 00 01 04 00 18 82 00 01 91 00 07 28 00 03 53 00 15 74 00 00 47 00 10 40 00 10 16 00 09 78 00 04 65 00 07 43
2636
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
1
2
5 ) Naraharipur( Contd)
59
62
6 ) Kudi
300
289
288
287
284
285
262
263
265
264
259
239
240
241
238
242
236
212
224
213
222
215
216
217
218
199
201
198
197
157
189
:88
160
187
166
167
171
170
Mandal/ Tehsil /Taluk : Mohanpur
[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )]
3
4
5
00
00
16
00
04
35
00
01
44
00
12
72
00
23
70
00
00
25
00
00
48
00
14
42
00
24
96
00
08
18
00
01
92
00
03
13
00
05
69
00
00
10
00
18
42
00
08
65
00
00
87
00
10
41
00
36
11
00
06
74
00
01
09
00
00
29
00
15
82
00
14
07
00
22
18
00
01
36
00
00
56
00
25
65
00
00
00
22
04
00
06
80
00
13
53
00
11
13
00
06
05
00
07
37
00
00
92
00
11
04
00
08
26
00
00
98
00
12
56
District: Medinipur
71
1 ) Nilpura
72
State:West Bengal
00
00
95
00
05
67 2637
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
2 3 4 5
1
75 00 08 56
! ) Nilpura (Contd )
77 00 06 45
74 00 01 39
78 00 16 46
63 00 00 53
62 00 13 59
60 00 16 55
56 00 02 98
48 00 38 56
47 00 01 17
42 00 08 30
41 00 03 00
39 00 03 87
37 00 16 38
36 00 01 70
35 00 08 10
33 00 12 59
32 00 01 91
209 00 14 89
41 00 15 45
2 ) Asura
40 00 00 11
39 00 00 10
54 00 04 33
38 00 04 33
35 00 00 91
33 00 02 65
32 00 04 97
31 00 01 48
29 00 12 80
30 00 07 12
73 00 00 20
74 00 07 75
35 00 29 56
3 ) Sandapura
37 00 03 81
180 00 02 25
38 00 02 66
39 00 00 71
179 00 05 88
172 00 00 85
174 00 00 22
173 00 09 99
168 00 00 10
2638
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
1 2
3) Sandapura( Contd) 171
170
169
175
162
163
161
151
152
153
147
142
145
146
144
134
135
136
139
137
138
129
128
122
121
120
109
4 ) Paluya 288
277
286
284
290
674
291
667
672
668
665
664
663
662
317
[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii )]
3 4 5 00 00 38 00 04 85 00 01 42 00 00 10 00 14 95 00 00 45 00 02 25 00 13 53 00 02 15 00 00 10 00 04 59 00 01 87 00 00 99 00 02 19 00 02 43 00 00 80 00 05 11 00 00 10 00 05 75 00 01 65 00 01 93 00 03 41 00 26 68 00 00 98 00 07 58 00 00 20 00 22 00 00 00 54 00 00 82 00 13 77 00 02 15 00 06 31 00 00 10 00 22 66 00 04 35 00 00 30 00 19 88 00 10 33 00 09 05 00 04 04 00 00 33 00 15 03
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2639
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2 3 4 5
4 ) Paluya ( Contd) 645
00 IS 39
646 00 02
12
644 00 01
72
558 00
65
559 00 00
46
560 00
01 76
557 00 04
64
556 00
04 49
551 00
06 85
$52 00
09 68
550 00 01 38
5 ) Tanuya 3077 00 00 47
3078 00
00 81
3079 00 04
51
3080
00 05 20
3081 00 14
3083
00 00 11
3084 00 08 85
3085 00
02 85
3086 00
00 31
3087 00
03 86
6 ) Kasichak 204
00 01 66
190
00 00 68
188 00 06
71
187 00
03 32
56 00
05 18
48 00
06 22
5' 00 01 03
50
00 14 57
49
00 00 51
57 00
02 88
58 00
04 19
59 00
00 70
64
00 06 10
72 00
07 89
65 00
01 38
73
00 02 45
71 00
04 55
74
00 08 70
75 00 03
77
77
00 01 04
76
00 08 34
2640
[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2 3 4 5
1
79 00 00 90
6) Kasichak ( Contd)
100 00 07 54
7 ) Mayurkhola
99 00 08 84
97 00 11 66
96 00 00 62
95 00 30 27
474 00 01 97
475 00 10 06
476 00 01 27
744 00 15 51
743 00 10 65
745 00 14 63
741 00 07 21
754 00 06 03
740 00 07 63
755 00 09 55
757 00 17 99
758 00 12 18
759 00 03 24
765 00 16 56
1256 00 00 10
8 ) Rajnagar
1255 00 15 25
1254 00 07 07
[F. No. L- 14014/2/2011 -GP. ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 13 मार्च , 2012
का. आ. 1079.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ . 730 तारीख 21.02.2011 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , तमिलनाडु में तिरूतन्नी के पास विजयवाडा-नैलुर- चैन्नई पाइपलाइन के टर्मिनल प्वाइंट से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा चैन्नई -बंगलौर मंगलौर पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;
और, उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 08 सितंबर 2011 को अथवा उससे पूर्व उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं ;
और , पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में, जनता की ओर से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्नात कर दिया गया ;
और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और , भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012 /फाल्गुन 27, 1933
2641
अतः, अव, भारत सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ; और, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्तभूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
तालुक: चींतामणी
जिला:चीकबल्लापुर
गाँव का नाम
सर्वे सं/सब डिविजन सं.
1
2
16
1 ) जंगमपुरा
13
10
11
12
6
5
4
43
3
42
40
39
2 ) होसहल्ली
111
112
113
145
146
155
154
152
153
175
266
176
177
179
178
191
192
202
203
110/ए
110/बी
110/सी
119/सी
156/ए
राज्य: कर्नाटक
आर- ओ-यू-अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
एयर सि-एयर
3
4
5
00
71
33
00
44
16
00
10
02
00
07
77
00
13
28
20
00
29
00
10
28
00
07
55
00
01
32
00
25
77
00
42
61
00
25
30
00
37
96
00
16
54
00
22
07
00
00
73
00
38
63
00
34
95
00
53
36
00
39
15
00
31
54
00
01
99
00
18
72
00
04
56
00
16
01
00
19
43
00
12
45
00
16
35
00
50
49
00
26
64
00
21
93
00
31
25
00
07
38
00
21
60
00
02
30
00
32
80
00
02
98 [Part II--Sec . 3 (ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2642
2
1
156/बी
2 ) होसहल्ली (निरंतर )
59
3 ) सुब्बरायनपेट
60
5
4
3
51 00 28
72 00
28
07 05
00
राज्य:कर्नाटक
जिला:बंगलुरू रूरल
लालुक: दोडबल्लापुर
43
1 ) कार्नाला
49
152
154
153
155
50
51
26/2
26/3
29/1
29/2
28/1
28/ 2ए
40/1
40/2
40/3
40/4
40/7
40/8
40/13
159/1
69 44
00
60 00
83
20 15
00
10 02
00
51 03
00
20
15
00
39 00
50
56
23
00
76
11
00
56 00
37
16
15
00
34
10
00
90
12
00
09
22
00
55
02
00
40
03
00
09
05
00
78
06
00
14
69 00
86
45
00
46
00
00
99
07
00
राज्य:कर्नाटक
जिला:वंगलुरू रूरल
तालुक: नेलमंगल 00 73 89
154
1 ) देवरहोसहल्ली 00 32 72
155
00 27 84
156
00 23 85
162
00 72 79
152
00 10 24
157/1
00 07 05
157/2
00 02 66
157/4
00 00 48
142/1
00 65 03
142/4
00 26 33
161/1
00 08 78
161/2
00 09 97
2 ) हलेनिजगल 158
00 00 54
159
00 31 05
160
00 00 58
4
00 05 00
3 00 04 18
2
00 25 73
21
00 42 86
61
00 25 50
22
00 01 55
70
00 18 24
68
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
2643
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2 1
79
) हलेनिजगल (निरंतर)
76
161/1
161/2
33/2
31/3
31/4
31/5
7/1
7/2
17/1
17/2
60/3
73/1
72/ 5ए
77/3ए
77/3बी
77/4
77/5
77/6
74/1
74/2
74/3
180/3
75/1
5
4
3
40 00
10
70 00
11
00
12
90
14 00
04
41 00
24
00
05
66
47 09
00
53 00
07
31 42
00
28 00
10
82 00
22
21
15 00
49 00
00
23 04
00
73 28
00
19 00
00
15 00
04
07 00
03
31 04
00
59 00
05
00
55 00
43 16
00
70 13
00
61 00 01
48 00 00
[फा सं. एल. 14014/ 81/2010- जी.पी. ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 13th March , 2012
S. O. 1079. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , number S.O. 730 dated 21-02-2011 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Chennai - Bangalore-Mangalore gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas from- terminal point of Vijayawada -Nellore - Chennai pipeline near Tiruttani in TamilNadu by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited to consumers in various parts of the country;
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on or before 08th September 2011 ;
And whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;
And whereas , the Competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government of India;
And whereas , Government of India, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein ;
686 GI/2012-21 2644
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/ PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[Part II Sec. 3( ii) ]
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land, specified in the Schedule, appended to this notification , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , free from all encumbrances .
Schedule
Taluk: Chintamani District: Chikballapur State: Karnataka
Village Survey No./Sub-Division No. Area to be acquired for RoU
Hec Are C-Are
1 2 3 4 5
1 ) Jangamapura 16 00 71 33
13 00 44 16
10 00 10 02
11 00 07 77
12 00 13 28
6 00 20 29
5 00 10 28
4 00 07 55
43 00 01 32
3 00 25 77
42 00 42 61
40 00 25 30
39 00 37 96
2 ) Hosahalli 111 00 16 54
112 00 22. 07
113 00 00 73
145 00 38 63
146 00 34 95
155 00 53 36
154 00 39 15
152 00 31 54
153 00 01 99
175 00 18 72
266 00 04 56
176 00 16 01
177 00 19 43
179 00 12 45
178 00 16 35
191 00 50 49
192 00 26 64
202 00 21 93
203 00 31 25
110/A 00 07 38
110/ B 00 21 60
110/C 00 02 30
119/C 00 32 80
156'A 00 02 98
2645
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2646 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
2 3 4 5
1 4 5
00 28 51
2) Hosahalli (Contd) 156/B 97
2 ) Halenijagal 158 00 09
00 28 72
3 ) Subbarayanapete 59 159 00 00 54
00 05 07
60 00 31 05
160
4 State: Karnataka 00 00 58
Taluk:Dodballapur District: Bangalore Rural
3 00 44 00 69 05 00
43
1 ) Kaarmala. 2 00 04 18
49 00 83 60
21 00 25 73
00 15 20
152
61 00 42 86
154 00 02 10
22 00 25 50
153 00 03 51
70 00 01 55
155 00 15 20
68 00 18 24
00 50 39
50
00 10 40
79
00 23 56
51 70
76 00 11
00 11 76
26/2
161/1 00 12 90
00 37 56
26/3
161/2 00 04 14
29/1 00 15 16
33/2 00 24 41
00 10 34
29/2
31/3 00 05 66
28/1 00 12 90
31/4 00 09 47
28 /2A 00 22 09
31/5 00 07 53
40/1 00 02 55
7/1 00 42 31
40/2 00 03 40
7/2 00 10 28
40/3 00 05 09
17/1 00 22 82
40/4 00 06 78
17/2 00 21 15
40/7 00 14 69
60/3 00 00 49
40/8 00 45 86
73/1 00 04 23
00 00 46
40/13 73
72/5A 00 28
159/1 00 07 99
77/3A 00 00 19
77/3B State: Karnataka 00 04 15
Taluk : Nelarnangala District: Bangalore Rural
77/4 00 73 00 89 03- 07
1 ) Devarahosahalli 154
77/5 00 32 00 72 04 31
155
77/6 00 27 00 84 05 59
156
74/1 00 23 00 85 00 55
162
74/2 00 72 00 79 16 43
152
157/1 74/3 00 10 00 24 13 70
157/2 180/3 00 07 00 05 01 61
75/1 00 02 00 66 00 48
157/4
142/1 00 00 48
142/4 00 65 03
161/1 00 26 33
00 08 78
161/2
[F. No. 1. -14014/ 81 /2010-GP. ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
2647 [ भाग II ---खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
Dated: 23rd December , 2011
AWARD
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2012
By Order No. L - 12011 /275/2000 - IR( B - II ) dated 14.05.2011 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 ) ( d ) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
का०आ० 1080.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि किरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-01-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -12011/275/2000- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in not additing the number of Peon- cum-Guard and Peon- cum -Chowkidar to the number of members of sub- staff recruited as Peons for calculating 25% of Peons for the purpose of conversion of part time Sweepers/ full time Sweeper to the category of Peons is legal andjustified ? If not , what relief are the deprived part time sweepers/ full time sweepers entitled to ? "
New Delhi , the 14th February, 2012
S.O. 1080.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , KOLKATA now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16/01/2012 .
2. This date is fixed for hearing and disposal of an application dated 31.05.2011 filed by the workmen union. In the said application the workmen union has prayed for withdrawal of the present reference on the ground stated in the said application . It is stated that the purpose to raise the present dispute has been satisfied with the abolition of the designation of Pcon-cum-Guard and introducing recruitment only for the Armed Guard bifurcating the post of Peon separately which was the desire of the workmen union . Management side has no objection in this regard.
[No. L - 12011 /275/2000- IR(B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
3. In such circumstance , the present reference is disposed of for non- prosecution from the side of the workmen union since withdrawal cannot be permitted as the reference has been made from the appropriate Government.
CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 18 of 2001
AnAward accordingly is passed .
JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR , Presiding Officer Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank
Dated, Kolkata , The23rd December, 2011 .
And
Their workmen .
नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2012
PRESENT:
Mr. Justice Manik Mohan Sarkar, Presiding Officer
APPEARANCE :
Mr. P.C. Gochhayat , Manager of the Bank.
Onbehalf of the : Management
का०आ० 1081.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स चुन्नीलाल पटेल मालिक ऋषभ ईम्पेक्स मार्बल माईन्स उदयपुर के प्रबंधतत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, उदयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या1/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21/2/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Onbehalf of the : Workmen
Mr. Soumitra Mukherjee , President ofthe workmen union .
[सं० एल -29012/75/2008- आई आर ( एम) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव State: West Bengal
Industry : Banking [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2648
NewDelhi, the 14th February, 2012 New Delhi , the 21st February, 2012
S.O. 1082.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 02/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Udaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the managemeni of Western Railway and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21/02/2012 .
S.O. 1981 .---In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No........ 1/2009 ........ ) of the Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, UDAIPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in reation to the management ofM/ s Chunnilal Patel Owner Rishabh Impex Marble Mines ( Udaipur ) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21/02/2012.
[No. L-41012/249/99 -IR(B - I) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer [No. 1-29012/ 75 /2008 -IR (M ) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary
अनुबंध
अनुबंध
अधिक में- L-29012/ 75 /2008 - IR ( M ) B - 11/ 7/08
औद्योगिक विदाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, उदयपुर ( राजस्थान ) पीठासीन अधिकारी- श्री ताराचन्द सोनी , आर० एक जे एस०
Case No. L109 1.T.R. केन्द्र सरकार
पकरण संख्या 02/11 आई०टी० आर०
श्रीबिशम्बर दयाल शर्मा पिता लब्भुराम शर्मा,
अन्नानः किशन लाल मोणा बनाम चुन्नीलाल पटेल प्रार्थी श्री किशनलाल भीणा रजिश विध ऊप्र० ।
टवर वेगन रिपेयर वर्कशाप , पश्चिपी रेल्वे, कोटा
विपक्षी चुन्नीलाल मय अधि सी A.K. मोगरा उ०प्र० ।
द्वारा श्री संजीव कुमार शर्मा, एयर पोर्ट रोड, डबोक, उदयपुर
----प्रार्थी
विरूद्ध
श्री चीफ वर्क्स मैनेजर ( C.M.E.W. )
पक्षकारान ने एक प्रार्थना पत्र कर निवेदन किया कि उन्होंने लोक अदालत की भावना से कलेम फुल एण्ड फाइनल सेटलमेंट कर लिया है तथा माफिक सेटलमेंन्ट नकद राशि प्रार्थी ने प्राप्त कर ली है व प्रार्थी विपक्ष से सर्विस का हक त्याग रहा है । अतः राजकीय तस्दीक फरमाया जावे ।
वेंगन रिपेयर वर्कशाप , पश्चिम रेलवे , कोटा
---विपक्षी दोनों पक्षों को राजीनामा पढकर सुनाया व समझाया गया । दोनों पक्षों ने राजीनामा सही होना स्वीकार किया । प्रार्थी किसी रंजिश विधयी व विपक्षी श्री A.K. मोगरा अधिक्षक ने शिनाख्त किया ।
उपस्थित:-
:
प्रार्थी की और से
सुश्री बीनामाथुर, अतः प्रस्तुत राजीनामा तस्दीक किया जाता है । प्रकरण कि अब कोई कार्यवाही शेष नहीं है ।
विपक्षी की ओर से :
श्री बी. एस . देवपुरा,
:: पंचाट::
पक्षकारान द्वारा प्रस्तुत राजीनामा के आधार पर प्रार्थी के इस विवाद कि " नोडिस्पूट अवार्ड " जारी किया जाता है ।
दिनांक 21 दिसम्बर, 2011
भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना क्रमांक सूचना भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय को दिया जाये प्रश्नावली शुमार होकर दाखिल करता है
ह०/- ( अपठनीय)
न्यायाधीश
L-41012/ 249 / 99 / IR (B - I) दिनांक 11.01.2001 के द्वारा निम्नांकित विवाद औ० वि० अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, कोटा को अधिनिर्णयार्थ प्रेषितकिया गया-
नई दिल्ली , 21 फरवरी , 2012
"Whether the action of the management of Western Railway, Kota in terminating the service of Shri Vishambhar Dayal Sharma (w.e.f. 18.12.80 ) is just , reasonable and legal If not . to what relief the workman isentitled to ? "
का०आ० 1082.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पश्चिम रेलवे प्रबंध तत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद केन्द्रीय सरकार में औद्योगिक अधिकरण उदयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 02/11 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21/2/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-41012/249/99 - आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]
उक्त आशय का प्रसंग प्राप्त होने पर कोटा न्यायालय द्वारा प्रकरण संख्या 03/2000 आई.टी.आर. दर्ज रजिस्टर किया गया एवं सम्बन्धित पक्षकारान को नोटिस जारी किये गये । जिस पर प्रार्थी की और से क्लेम व विपक्षीगण की और से जबाब न्यायालय कोटा में पेश किया गया ।
रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2649
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
तत्पश्चात् भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय के आदेश दिनांक 17. 02.2011 से यह प्रकरण अन्तरित होकर इस न्यायालय में प्राप्त हुआ तथा इस न्यायालय में प्रकरण संख्या 02/11 आई.टी.आर. दर्ज किया गया।
प्रार्थी ने अपने स्टेटमेन्ट आफ क्लेम में यह अभिवाक किया है कि उसने दिनांक 03.05.1962 को सेवा प्रारम्भ की थी तथा वर्ष 1964 में उसे टर्नर वर्ग तृतीय में पदोन्नत किया गया था तथा 1968 में उसे स्थाई कर दिया गया । प्रार्थी दिनांक 12.08.77 से 09.09.77 तक अपना अवकाश स्वीकृत करा कर रेलवे पास लेकर मुख्यालय छोड़ने की इजाजत लेकर अपने पिताजी के यहां करतारपुर जालन्धर गया था । वहां प्रार्थी बीमार पड़ गया और चलने फिरने लायक भी नहीं रहा । इस पर अवकाश बढाने के लिये आवेदन किया जो स्वीकार किया गया, लेकिन प्रार्थी की तबीयत में सुधार नहीं हुआ, इस पर वह लगातार अपने अधिकारियों को प्रार्थना पत्र भेज कर व तार भेज कर अवकाश बढ़ाने की प्रार्थना करता रहा । इसी भौरान दिनांक 06.06.78 को विपक्षी ने प्रार्थी को ड्यूटी पर उपस्थित होने क सम्बन्ध में लिखा, लेकिन प्रार्थी ने अपनी बीमारी के कारण ड्यूटी पर उपस्थित होने के अपनी मजबूरी प्रकट की और अवकाश बढाने के लिये निवेदन किया । विपक्षी ने उसे एक आरोप पत्र दिया कि आप दिनांक 10.10.77 से अनाधिकृत रूप से अनुपस्थित चल रहे हैं, जबकि वास्तव में प्रार्थी बीमार था । विपक्षी ने उसके द्वारा प्रस्तुत प्रार्थना पत्रों एवं रोग प्रमाण पत्रों पर कोई ध्यान नहीं दिया । प्राइवेट डाक्टर के प्रमाण पत्र भी रेलवे नियमों के अनुसार माने जाने योग्य थे । अन्त में एक एक अनुचित जांच जिसमें प्राकृतिक न्याय के सिद्धान्तों को अवहेलना की गई, बचाव की अवसर नहीं दिया गया, प्रार्थी को दोषी करार देते हुए उसकी सेवा समाप्त कर दी गई । वस्तुतः जिस अधिकारी द्वारा सेवा समाप्त की गई वह नियुक्तिअधिकारी नहीं था, इसलिये उनका कृत्य वैध ॥निक नहीं है । प्रार्थी को सुनवाई का अवसर नहीं दिया गया । भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद 311 ( 2 ) के अनुसार नोटिस नहीं दिया गया, इसलिये उसे पुनः सेवा में बहाल कराया जाये तथा सेवा में निरन्तरता बनाये रखते हुए उसे सम्पूर्ण अवधि का वेतन व अन्य लाभ दिलाया जाये ।
विपक्षी ने अपने जबाब में प्रार्थी का रेलवे में नियुक्त होना, पदोन्नति होना, स्थाई होना, आरोप पत्र देना स्वीकार कर लिया गया , लेकिन यह कहा गया कि वर्ष 1980 में उसे सेवा से हटाया गया था , 18 वर्ष की लम्बी देरी के बाद यह विवाद उठाया गया है, जिसका कोई स्पष्टीकरण नहीं दिया गया है । गुणवता के सम्बन्ध में यह कहा गया कि जिस अधिकारी द्वारा सेवा से हटाने का आदेश दिया गया जो वर्क्स मैनेजर था जो प्रार्थी के नियुक्ति अधिकारी के समान पद का अधिकारी था, इसलिये कोई त्रुटि नहीं की गई है । सही तरीके से विभागीय जांच की गई है, विभागीय जांच करने से पूर्व कार्य पर उपस्थित होने के सम्बन्ध में नोटिस भिजवाया गया जो प्रार्थी को प्राप्त हो गया , लेकिन वह उपस्थित नहीं हुआ । प्रार्थी के द्वारा अनुपस्थिति के सम्बन्ध में कोई अवकाश प्रार्थना पत्र या चिकित्सा प्रमाण पत्र प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया, सुनवाई का समुचित अवसर देने के बाद जांच में दोषी पाया गया तथा सही तरीके से सेवा मुक्तकिया गया । इसलिये प्रार्थी किसी प्रकार की सहायता प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।
यह प्रसंग कोटा स्थित श्रम न्यायालय में प्रारम्भिक रूप से प्रस्तुत हुआ था तथा इस मामले में यह स्वीकृत स्थिति थी कि आरोप पत्र दिया जाकर विभागीय जांच कार्यवाही अमल में लाई गई तथा आरोप को साबित मान कर सेवा समाप्त की गई, ऐसे मामले में जबाब प्रस्तुत होने के बाद साक्ष्य लेखबद्ध किये जाने की आवश्यकता नहीं थी, बल्कि विभागीय जांच की फेयरनेस पर न्यायालय को अपना मत व्यक्त करना था, लेकिन त्रुटिवश दोनों पक्षों की साक्ष्य इस मामले में लेखबद्ध की गई । बाद में यह प्रकरण अन्तरित होकर इस न्यायालय को प्राप्त हुआ ।
चूंकि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 11 ( ए ) के साथ दिये गये परन्तुक में इस बात का स्पष्ट प्रावधान किया गया है कि श्रम न्यायालय केवल मात्र उस साक्ष्य पर ही विचार कर अपना मत अंकित करेगा जोविभागीय जांच पत्रावली में उपलब्ध थे, इस मामले में कोई नई साक्ष्य लेखबद्ध नहीं की जावेगी । ऐसी स्थिति में लेखबद्ध की गई साक्ष्य पर यह न्यायालय विधि के अनुसार विचार नहीं करेगा ।
विभागीय जांच पत्रावली में उपलब्ध साक्ष्य के सम्बन्ध में हमने उभय पक्षों के विद्वान अधिवक्ता को सुना । जिसमें प्रार्थी के विद्वान अधि विक्ताका यह तर्क रहा है कि इस मामले में प्राकृतिक न्याय के सिद्धान्तों कीअवहेलना की गई है , सुनवाई का पर्याप्त अवसर नहीं दिया, जिसका विपक्षी की तरफ से पुरजोर विरोध किया गया है तथा न्यायालय का ध्यान विभागीय जांच पत्रावलो में आई साक्ष्य की और आकर्षित किया । मैंने विभागीय जांच पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया तो पाया कि पेज संख्या एक पर वह पत्र उपलब्ध है , जो दिनांक 24.12.77 को निर्माण प्रबन्धक कोटा द्वारा प्रार्थी बिसम्भर दयाल शर्मा के नाम जारी किया गया था इसमें दिनांक 10.10.77 से अनुपस्थित होने की बात दर्ज करते हुए श्री बिसम्बर दयाल शर्मा को कार्य पर उपस्थित होने के निर्देश दिये गये तथा यह पत्र प्रार्थी को प्राप्त हो गया , इस सम्बन्ध में अभिस्वीकृति पेज संख्या 3 पर उपलब्ध है । शोध अधीक्षक ने उत्पादन इंजीनियर कोटा को बिसम्भर दयाल की अनुपस्थिति के सम्बन्ध में जो पत्र दिनांक 01.05.1978 को प्रेषित किया वह पेज संख्या 2 पर उपलब्ध है । इस मामले में अनुपस्थिति के सम्बन्ध में साक्ष्य की विषद व्याख्या करने की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है, क्योंकि अनुपस्थिति इस मामले में स्वीकृत स्थिति है , इसलिये इस अनुपस्थितिको साबित करने के सम्बन्ध में पत्रावली पर जो साक्ष्य आई है, उसकी व्याख्या इस प्रकम में नहीं कर रहे हैं, प्रार्थी का यह अभिवाक रहा है कि वह बीमार होने के कारण अनुपस्थित रहा है तथा इस बीमारी की सूचना जरिये पत्र व टेलीग्राम से दी गई । उल्लेखनिय है कि ऐसा कोई पत्र जांच पत्रावली में उपलब्ध नही है और यहां तक कि प्रार्थी ने इस प्रकार काकोई चिकित्सा प्रमाण पत्र जो यह दर्शित करता हो कि प्रार्थी विवादस्पद अवधि में बीमार रहा , न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गयाहै । बहस के दौरान यह कहने का प्रयास किया गया है कि प्रार्थी जिस गांवमें बीमार पड़ा वहां पर फोटो कॉपी कराने की सुविधा उपलब्ध नहीं थी तथा मूल प्रमाण पत्र ही प्रेषित कर दिये गये, लेकिन ये प्रमाण पत्र भिजवाये जाने के संबंध में कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं की गई । बहस के दौरान प्रार्थी के विद्वान अधिवक्ता का यह तर्क रहा है कि सभी पत्र साधारण डाक से प्रेषित किये गये, इसलिये उनकी प्राप्ति अभिस्वीकृति न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रेषित नहीं की गई । मेरे विनम्र मत में यह तर्क माने जाने योग्य नहीं है , क्योंकि प्रार्थी द्वारा पहला अवकाश स्वीकार करवा कर [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2650
इस मामले में विभागीय जांच पत्रावली के अवलोकन से यह बात प्रकट हो रही कि प्रार्थी के अनुपस्थिति के कारण उसे कार्य पर उपस्थित होने के संबंध में नोटिस न केवल एक बार बल्कि दो बार दिये गये, इन नोटिस के प्राप्त होने के बाद प्रार्थी का यह दायित्व था कि वो रेलवे कि अधिकृत चिकित्सक को अपने निवास पर बुला कर अपने स्वास्थ्यकी जांच करवाता, लेकिन उसके द्वारा ऐसा नहीं किया गया है।
तथा प्रथम आवेदन अवकाश बढ़ाने हेतु उसकी प्राप्ति अभिस्वीकृति प्रस्तुत की गई , इससे यह स्पष्ट है कि प्रार्थी के पास रजिस्टर्ड डाक से पत्र भिजवाने की सुविधा उपलब्ध थी, लेकिन उसके द्वारा इस प्रकार की सुविधा का लाभ नहीं उठाया गया । ऐसी स्थिति में हम यह मानने में असमर्थ है कि रजिस्टर्ड डाक से भिजवाने की सुविधा उपलब्ध नहीं थी, इसलिये साधारण डाक से पत्र एवं चिकित्सा प्रमाण पत्र प्रेषित किये गये।
इस मामले में जो आरोपपत्र पर जारी किया गया जांच पत्रावली के पृष्ठ संख्या 7 व 8 पर उपलब्ध है, जिसमें स्पष्ट रूप से यह आरोप लगाया गया कि प्रार्थी दिनांक 10.10.77 से अभी तक अपने कार्य से अनाधिकृत अनुपस्थित रह रहा है तथा यदि वह अस्वस्थ्य है तो चिकित्सा नियमें का पालन नहीं कर रहे हैं । इस संबंध में प्रार्थी के विद्वान अधिवक्ता का यह तर्क रहा है कि कौन से नियम की पालना नहीं की जा रही है, आरोप पत्र में उल्लेख नहीं था । विपक्षी के विद्वान अधिवक्ता ने पश्चिमी रेलवे में अराजपत्रित रेल कर्मचारियों को डाक्टरी प्रमाण पत्र पर छुट्टी की मंजूरी के संबंध मे बनाये गये नियम को न्यायालय के समक्ष प्रस्तुत किया है । ये नियम Indian Railways Establishment Code Volume I appendix VI में दर्शित किये गये हैं, तथा इसका प्रकाशन राजपत्र मे होचुका है। विधि एवं नियमों की जानकारी के संबंध में न्यायालय यह अवधारणा करता है कि प्रत्येक व्यक्ति को कानून एवं नियम की जानकारी होती है, कोई भी व्यक्ति विधि की अज्ञानता का बचाव नहीं ले सकता है । इन नियमों के नियम संख्या एस. आर 2/5 ए तथा बी, नियम संख्या एस. आर 2/7 , 2/8 , 2/12 , 3/3 बहुत महत्वपूर्ण है ।
विभागीय जांच में श्री एन.सी. गुप्ता को प्रार्थी ने अपना बचाव प्रतिनिधिनियुक्त करने हेतु एक आवेदन प्रस्तुत किया जो पेज संख्या 11 पर उपलब्ध है । यह आवेदन विभाग द्वारा स्वीकार करते हुए जबाव प्रस्तुत करने का निर्देश दिया गया । हमार समक्ष उपलब्ध विभागीय जांच पत्रावली में पेज संख्या 17 पर उत्पादन इंजीनियर का वह पत्र उपलब्ध है, जिसके जरिये उन्होंने अनुशासन एवं अपील अधिकारी से यह पूछा गया कि प्रार्थी काकोई स्वास्थ्यप्रमाण पत्र प्राप्त हुआ या नहीं और यदि प्राप्त हुआ तो उनका पूर्ण विवरण भिजवाएं । इसका जबाव पृष्ठ संख्या 18 पर उपलब्ध पत्र द्वारा भेजा गया, जिसमें कोई अस्वस्थ्यता प्रमाण पत्र प्राप्त नहीं होना बताया । जांच अधिकारी की नियुक्ति का आदेश पत्र पृष्ठ संख्या 19 पर उपलब्ध है । जांच अधिकारी द्वारा कार्यवाही प्रारम्भ करने पर एन.सी. गुप्ता बचाव प्रतिनिधि ने दिनांक 16.02.79 को लिखा पत्र जो पृष्ठ संख्या 24 पर है, के द्वारा जांच अधिकारी से यह प्रार्थना की किदिनांक 22.02.79 की पेशी नियत की गई, इन सभी पत्रों की प्रतियां बिशम्भ्बर दयाल शर्मा कोदी गई, जिनकी प्राप्ति अभिस्वीकृति पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध है । तत्पश्चात् दिनांक 03.10.79 की पेशी नियत की गई, उसके बाद दिनांक 20.03.80 की पेशी नियत की गई, उसके बाद दिनांक 18.04. 80 की पेशी नियत की गई, फिर 16.05.80 की पेशी नियत की गई, फिर 29.05.80 की पेशी नियत की गई तथा बार- बार सूचना भिजवाई गई तथा बार- बार अनुपस्थित होते रहे । इसके बाद दिनांक 23.10.80 के पत्र द्वारा तत्काल समीप के रेलवे डाक्टर के पास चिकित्सा जांच हेतु उपस्थितहोने एवं रेलवे डाक्टर द्वारा जारी चिकित्सा प्रमाण पत्र प्रस्तुत करने के निर्देश दिये गये एवं बाद में सुनवाई हेतु दिनांक 27.11.80 की पेशी नियत की गई , लेकिन उस दिन भी अनुपस्थित रहने पर साक्षी मोहनलाल शर्मा, रमेशचन्द्र माथुर, गयाप्रसाद, कल्याण निर्भिक के कथन लेखबद्ध किये गये । उन्होने यह बयान दिये कि दिनांक 10.10.77 से 09.08.78 तक उनकी तरफ से कोई अवकाश प्रार्थना पत्र या बीमारी का प्रमाण पत्र प्रस्तुत नहीं किया हुआ । टाईम आफिस से भी यह पता किया गया कि वहां भी इस प्रकार की कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं हुई । रजिस्टर्ड ए/डी पत्र भिजवाने के संबंध में कल्याण निर्भिक कथन है कि दिनांक 06.06.78 को एक रजिस्टर्ड ए/डी पत्र भेजा गया, जिसकी पावती कार्यालय में प्राप्त हुई, लेकिन बिशम्भर ड्युटी पर उपस्थित नहीं हुए तथा दिनांक 08.12.80 को प्रार्थी को दोषी करार दिया गया । तथा एन.सी. गुप्ता ने दिनांक 27.11.80 के संबंध में कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं हुई, वहीं पर एन.सी. गुप्ता ने यह आश्चर्य भी प्रकट किया कि उन्हें सूचना दिये बिना किस प्रकार कार्यवाही एक पक्षीय कर दी, इसलिये यह स्पष्ट हैकि उन्हें पेशी की पूरी जानकारी थी, लेकिन जान बूझ कर वे उपस्थित नहीं हुए। जांच अधिकारी का यह दायित्व होता है कि वह आरोपित कर्मचारी को नियत की जाने वाली तारीख की सूचना दे तथा उससे उपस्थितहोने की अपेक्षा करे, उपस्थित होना या न होना कर्मचारी के हम इस बात से पूरी तरह सहमत हैं कि इन नियमों के तहत किसी भीअराजपत्रित रेलवे कर्मचारी को इस बात की कोई बाध्यता नहीं है कि वह रेलवे के चिकित्सक से ही अपना इलाज करावे व किसी भी रजिस्टर्ड मेडिकल प्रेक्टिशनर से चाहे वह एलोपेथिक हो या आयुर्वेदिक हो या युनानी हो, अपना इलाज करवाने के लिये स्वतन्त्र है । लेकिन उसमें यह शर्त है भी अधिरोपित की है कि ऐसी स्थिति में वह चिकित्सा प्रमाण पत्र रेलवे के चिकित्सक के पास प्रस्तुत करेगा तथा उससे प्रमाणित करवा कर रेलवे के अधिकारी को प्रेषित करेगा तथा स्वस्थाय होने के बाद वह अपना प्रमाण पत्र लेकर रेलवे के चिकित्सक के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करेगा तथा वहां से प्रमाणित कर देने पर अपने आवेदन के साथ अवकाश आवेदन प्रस्तुत करेगा तथा जहां रेलवे कर्मचारी ऐसे स्थान पर बीमार पड़ा, जहां रेलवे का डाक्टर मौजूद नहीं है तो वह उस क्षेत्र के रेलवे चिकित्सक को अपने घर पर भी बुला सकता है जो आवश्यक जांच करके प्रमाण पत्र जारी करने हेतु सक्षम होगा । नियम में इस बात का स्पष्ट प्रावधान है कि ऐसे चिकित्सक को रेलवे द्वारा यात्रा पास उपलब्ध कराया जावेगा तथा यदि कर्मचारी स्वयं उपस्थित होता है तो उसे भी यात्रा पास उपलब्ध कराया जावेगा । इन सब सुविधाओं के उपलब्ध होते हुए भी प्रार्थी ने न तो अपने आप को रेलवे चिकित्सक के सामने प्रस्तुत किया और न ही रेलवे चिकित्सक को स्वंय के निवास पर बुलवाया गया । नियमों में इस बात का भी प्रावधान किया गया है कि इस प्रकार से मुख्यालय से बाहर रहने की स्थिति में स्वयं का पता भी अपने अधिकारी कोप्रेषित करना होगा , लेकिन प्रार्थी ने अपना पता भी प्रेषित नहीं किया , यहां तक कि उसने स्वस्थ्य होने के बाद फिटनेस प्रमाण पत्र भी प्रस्तुत नहींकिया ।
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933 2651
स्वयं के विवेक पर ही निर्भर है । इस मामले में जांच पत्रावली में इस बात है, बल्कि यदि कोई व्यक्ति 5 वर्ष का अवकाश चाहता है तो वह अपने
की पर्याप्त साक्ष्य उपलब्ध है कि बार- बार जांच अधिकारी द्वारा प्रार्थी अधिकारी के समक्ष आवेदन प्रस्तुत कर सकता है तथा यदि अधिकारी
एवं उसके बचाव प्रतिनिधि के उपस्थित न होने के कारण पेशी आगे मामले के तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों में उचित समझता है तो ऐसा अवकाश
बढ़ाई तथा उन्हे बार - बार सूचित किया गया लेकिन वे उपस्थित नहीं हुए । स्वीकृत करेगा और यदि कोई व्यक्ति बिना अवकाश के अनुपस्थित रहता
यदि कोई व्यक्ति जानबुझ कर जांच में उपस्थित नहीं होता है तथा यह है तब भी वह अनुपस्थिति का विश्वसनीय कारण बताता है तो 5 वर्ष का
कहता है कि जांच में प्राकृतिक न्याय के सिद्धान्तों की अवहेलना हुई है, अवकाश स्वीकृत किया जा सकता है, किन्तु इस मामले में ऐसी परिस्थितियां
उचित नहीं है ।
नहीं है, बल्किपर्याप्त समय उपलब्ध होते हुए भी कोई कारण नही बताया
प्रार्थी के विद्वान अधिवक्ता ने न्यायालय का ध्यान पेज संख्या 53 है एवं जो कारण बताया है उसके संबंध में कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं की ।
की ओर आकर्षित कर यह तर्क प्रस्तुत किया कि वे दस्तावेज जो विभाग विभागीय जांच में अपना बचाव प्रस्तुत नहीं किया तथा उसकी सेवा समाप्त
के पास उपलब्ध थे , उनकी सूची उपलब्ध है , जिसमें रजिस्टर्ड पत्र व तार करने के 18 वर्ष बाद यह विवाद उठाया जो किसी भी प्रकार से न्यायोचित
देने का विवरण है । इस संबंध में इन पत्रों पर सावधानी पूर्वक विचार नहीं कहा जा सकता है । देरी के संबंध में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने ए.
किया गया । पेज संख्या 54व 55 में जो पत्र लिखे गये ओर उसके नीचे आई.आर. 2006 सुप्रिम कोर्ट पेज 2670 एवं ए आई आर 2000 पेज 839
पेज संख्या 2 में अनुलग्नफ दो का उल्लेख उपलब्ध है तथा पेज संख्या में दोनों मामलों में क्रमशः ४ वर्ष व 7 वर्ष की देरी से विवाद उठाये जाने को
53 इस अनुलग्नक का भाग है । चूंकि इस पर विभाग के कर्मचारी व उचित नहीं ठहराया तथा स्पष्ट रूप से ये दिशा-निर्देश दिये कि प्रार्थी कोई
अधिकारी के हस्ताक्षर नहीं हैं , ऐसी स्थिति में यह तर्क करना कि ये सहायता प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है । जबकि हमारे समक्ष लम्बित
दस्तावेज विपक्षी के पास उपलब्ध हैं, विश्वास नहीं किया जा सकता है । मामले में तो विवाद 18 वर्ष की देरी से प्रस्तुत किया गया है । ऐसी सूरत में
यदि ये पत्र रजिस्टर्ड डाक से भेजे गये थे तो पोस्ट आफिस से इसकी मैं यह पाता हूं कि यह तर्क भी वजनदार नहीं है ।
सूचना प्राप्त की जा सकती थी, तार भेजने के संबंध में भी सूचना प्राप्त प्रार्थी के विद्वान अधिवक्ता ने हमारे समक्ष एक अन्य तर्क यह भी
की जा सकती थी, जो नहीं की गई । अन्त में प्रार्थी को सेवा से हटाने का प्रस्तुत किया किअनुपस्थिति की अवधि को अवैतनिक अवकाश स्वीकृत
आदेश पारित किया गया । इस प्रकार पूरी जांच पत्रावली के अवलोकन करते हुए उसे सेवा लाभ उपलब्ध करा दिया जावे तथा उन्होंने हमारे
से ऐसी परिस्थितियां उपलब्ध नहीं हो रही कि जिसमें प्राकृतिक न्याय के समक्ष कुछ निर्णय दृष्टान्त प्रस्तुत किये जिनमें से आर एल आर 2001
सिद्धान्तों की अनदेखी की गई हो, प्रार्थी को दस्तावेज उपलब्ध नहीं (2 ) पेज 216 सुजाता मल्होत्रा बनाम स्टेट आफ राजस्थान पेश किया
कराये गये हों , गवाह से जिरह का मौका नहीं दिया गया हो , बचाव प्रस्तुत जिसमें माननीय उच्च न्यायालय ने ये दिशा निर्देश दिये कि दण्डादेश
करने का अवसर नहीं दिया गया हो । ऐसी सूरत में मैं यह पाता हूं कि जांच पारित करने से पूर्व कारण अंकित करना चाहिये । हम विधि की इस
अधिकारी द्वारा जो जांच की गई है वह पूर्ण रूपेण उचित एवं न्याय संगत स्थिति से पूर्णतया सहमत हैं । इस मामले में लम्बी अनुपस्थिति का
है। कारण स्पष्ट रूप से दर्शाया है, जिसमें जांच अधिकारी ने अपनी रिपोर्ट
में यह उल्लेख किया है मौखिक एवं दस्तावेजी साक्ष्य एवं मामले में की
इस मामले में हमने दण्डादेश के बिन्दु पर विचार किया ।
परिस्थितियों में दोषी करार दिया जाता है जिसको माननीय न्यायालय ने
इस मामले में प्रार्थी के विद्वान अधिवक्ता का यह तर्क रहा है कि
पर्याप्त नहीं माना था , इस मामले में ऐसी परिस्थतियां नहीं है बल्कि जांच
जिस अधिकारी द्वारा सेवा समाप्ति का निर्णय लिया गया वह उसका
अधिकारी ने साक्षीगण के कथनों की विवेचना करते हुए यह कहा कि
नियुक्तिप्राधिकारी नहीं था, इसलिये यह आदेश विधि की दृष्टि में शुद्ध
साक्षीगण ने यह बताया कि कर्मचारी अनाधिकृत रूप से अनुपस्थित रहा
नहीं है तथा रेलवे एस्टाबिल्समेन्ट जनरल कन्डीशन आफ सर्विस एण्ड है तथा दिनांक 10.10.77 से 09.08.78 तक की अवधि का कोई अवकाश
एपोईन्टमेन्ट की तरफ भी आकर्षित करते हुए यह तर्क प्रस्तुत किया कि प्रार्थना पत्र पेश नही किया और न ही कोई मेडिकल प्रमाण पत्र ही पेश
कोई भी रेलवे कर्मचारी 5 वर्ष तक अवकाश ले सकता है ।
किया इसलिये उसे दोषी करार दिया गया है । ऐसी सूरत में यह निर्णय
हमने इन तर्कों पर सावधानी पूर्वक विचार किया । जहां तक सेवा दृष्यन्तप्रार्थी के लिये मददगार नहीं है ।
समाप्तिका आदेश पारित करने वाले अधिकारी का प्रश्न है, जो वर्क्स
एक निर्णय दृष्टान्त ए.आई.आर, 1970 सुप्रिम कोर्ट पेज 1302
मैनेजर है जो अनुशासन अधिकारी व प्रोडक्शन इंजीनियर के समक्ष मेसर्स महावीर प्रसाद बनाम संतोष कुमार का प्रस्तुत किया है , लेकिन
अधिकारी है । इसीलिए यह तर्क वजनदार नहीं है । जहां तक इस तर्क का
यह मामला उत्तर प्रदेश शुगर लायसेन्सिंग आर्डर के लायसेन्स के संबंध
प्रश्न है किकोई कर्मचारी 5 वर्ष तक अवकाश में रह सकता है , यह बात
में सुनने का था , न कि सेवा समाप्ति का मामले के संबंध में था, इसलिये
सही है कि रेलवे का कोई भी कर्मचारी 5 साल तक का अवकाश नियमों यह मामला भी प्रार्थी को कोई मदद नहीं करता है ।
के तहत प्राप्त कर सकता है यदि 5 साल से अधिक अवधि का अवकाश
चाहेगा तो महामहिम राष्ट्रपति से मंजूर करा सकता है, लेकिन उसका निर्णय दृष्टान्त ए.आई. आर. 2008 सुप्रीम कोई पेज 1479
अर्थ यह कदापि नहीं है कि किसी भी व्यक्ति को ताकत के जोर पर डिवीजनल फॉरेस्ट आफिसर बनाम मधुसुदन प्रस्तुत किया जिसमें
अवकाश लेने का अधिकार हो, कोई भी व्यक्ति अकारण अनुपस्थित माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने अपीलेट/रिवीजन प्राधिकारी द्वारा कारण
रहता है तो वह अनुशासनात्मक कार्यवाही का भागी होगा । इस 5 वर्ष की दर्शित करने को आवश्यक माना । इस मामले में प्रार्थी पर बहुत से
अवकाश अवधि के लिये अधिकार के रूप में दावा नहीं किया जा सकता आरोप नहीं है, केवल मात्र अनुपस्थिति का आरोप था, जिसको सही
686 GI / 2012-22 2652
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/ PHALGUNA 27, 1933
तरीके से साबित मानने को कहा गया इसलिये यह निर्णय दृष्यन्त भी मामले के तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों में मेल नहीं खाने से लागू नहीं किया जा सकताहै ।
ए.आई.आर. 1955 इलाहाबाद पेज 568 एम. एम. सिकी बनाम यूनियन आफ इण्डिया के निर्णय दृष्टान्त में अपना मत व्यक्त किया । यह मामला संविदा की शर्तों के अनुक्रम में सेवा मुक्ति से संबंधित था, इसलिये यह निर्णय दृष्टयन्त भी हमारे सलक्ष्म लम्बित मामले के तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों में मेल नहीं खाता है ।
ए.आई.आर. 1979 सुप्रीम कोर्ट पेज 1912 कृष्णाकुमार बनाम दी डिवीजनल असि. इलेक्ट्रिकल इंजीनियर के मामले में नियुक्ति प्राधिकारी के नीचे के पद वाली अधिकारी द्वारा सेवा मुक्ति की गई थी, जिसको माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने उचित नहीं ठहराया, लेकिन हमारे समक्ष लम्बित मामले में वर्क्स मैनेजर द्वारा नेवा मुक्त किया गया है जो अनुशासन अधिकारी प्रोडक्शन इंजीनियर से नीचे के पद का अधिकारी हो, ऐसीकोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं की गई ।
अजीवसिंह बनाम श्रीहिन्द को-ऑप मार्केटिंग अपील नम्बर 2157/1999 में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय के निर्णय दिनांक 8.4.99 में पारित किये गए निर्णय में देरी की आपत्ति श्रम न्यायालय के समक्ष नहीं उठाई गई थी तथा उच्च न्यायालय द्वारा देरी के आधार पर मामले को अस्वीकार किया जिसे उचित नहीं ठहराया गया । लेकिन हमारे समक्ष इस मामले के तथ्य ऐसे नहीं हैं क्योंकि प्रार्थी द्वारा स्टेटमेन्ट आफ क्लेम जो प्रस्तुत किया गया उसके जबाब में ही विपक्षी ने प्रथम पैरा में ही यह आपत्ति की है कि प्रार्थी को दिनांक 18.12.80 को रेलवे सेवा से हटाये जानेके आदेश पारित किए गये थे, जिसके संबंध में प्रार्थी द्वारा सहायक श्रम आयुक्त केन्द्रीय के समक्ष अपना विवाद 1998 में प्रस्तुत किया जो प्रथम दृष्ट्या ही अवधि बाधित होने से स्वीकार योग्य नहीं है । ऐसी स्थिति में इस निर्णय दृष्टान्त का भी कोई प्रार्थी को नहीं मिलता है ।
(1979 ) 3 सुप्रीम कोर्ट केसेज पेज 371 शंकर चक्रवर्ती बनाम ब्रिटानिया बिस्कीट के मामले में भी माननीय न्यायालय ने ये दिशा निर्देश दिये हैं कि औद्योगिक विवाद में विभागीय जांच के मामले में स्वयं न्यायालय साक्ष्य नहीं ले सकती है । हम विधि की इस स्थिति से सहमत है, जैसा कि हम प्रारम्भ में ही उल्लेख कर चुके हैं तथा इस मामले में न्यायालय द्वारा जो साक्ष्य लेखबद्ध की गई है उस पर हमने विचार नहीं किया है, इसलिये यह निर्णय दृष्टान्त भी प्रार्थी को कोई लाभ नहीं पहुंचाता है।
प्रार्थी का यह तर्क कि उसका अवैतनिक अवकाश स्वीकार कर लिया जावे तथा उसे पुनः सेवा में लिया जावे, मैं इस तर्क से सहमत नहीं हूं, क्योंकिपुराने समय में जहां सेवा से हटाये जाने पर अवैतनिक अवकाश स्वीकार करके सेवा में लिया जाता था, लेकिन बाद में " नो वर्क नो पे " कासिद्धान्त लागूहो गया तथा आज की तारीख में प्रार्थी सेवा निवृति की
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
आयु पूर्ण कर चुका है । श्रम न्यायालय औ० कि अधिनियम में केवल मात्र Needy व्यक्ति के कारण सुनवाई करके उसके पक्ष मे निर्णय पारित कर सकता है, न कि Greedy व्यक्ति के संबंध में । इस मामले में 1980 से सेवा से हटाये जाने के बाद उसके द्वारा महामहिम राष्ट्रपति महोदय तक शिकायत प्रस्तुत कर चुका है , लेकिन उसे कोई लाभ प्राप्त नहीं हुआ है । केन्द्रीय प्राधिकृत अधिकारी के समक्ष भी अपील प्रस्तुत की गई, ऐसी विपक्षी ने अपने जवाब में बताया है , लेकिन उस अपील का क्याहश्र हुआ यह न्यायालय में स्पष्ट नहीं किया है ।
ऐसी स्थिति में यह स्पष्ट है कि प्रार्थी को अपने अधिकारों सेकोई लेना देना नहीं है तथा इस अवधि का बिना काम किये ही केवल मात्र पैसा प्राप्त करने का उददेश्यही है ऐसी स्थिति में सेवा से हटाये जाने के संबंध में जो निर्णय रेलवे के अधिकारी द्वारा लिया गया है, वह किसी भी प्रकार से अनुचित नहीं है । अतः प्रार्थी किसी प्रकार का कोई लाभ प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।
अतः समुचित सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित प्रसंग दिनांक 11.01.2000 व 17.02.2011 को उत्तरित करते हुए पंचाट इस प्रकार पारित किया जाता है कि- विपक्षी प्रबन्धन पश्चिमी रेलवे कोटा द्वारा प्रार्थी श्री विशम्भर दयाल शर्मा को दिनांक 18.12.80 से सेवा पृथक किया जाना उचित एवं वैध है । अतः प्रार्थी कोई राहत पाने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।
ताराचन्द सोनी, न्यायधीश
नई दिल्ली, 21 , फरवरी , 2012
काआ० 1083.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जनरल मैनेजर टेलीकाम बी०एस० एन० एल० सम्भलपुर एण्ड अदर्स प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या-18 /2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21/02/2012 प्राप्तु हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -40012/7/2009- आई आर ( डी०यू०) ]
रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 21st February, 2012
S.O. 1083. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 18/2009 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. Bhubaneswar- 2 as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrialdispute between the einpioyers in relationto the management of General Manager Telecom BSNL Sambhalpur and others and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21.02.2012 .
[No. L-40012/ 7 /2009 - IR(DU) ] Ramesh Singh , Desk Officer [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2653
भारत का राजपत्र मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27, 1933
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
PRESENT:
Shri J. Srivastava, Presiding Officer, C.GI.T. -cum -Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 18/2009
Date of Passing Award - 17th January, 2012
BETWEEN:
1. The Sub -Divisional Officer (Telecom) , D/o . Telecom, Bargarh .
2. The General Manager, Telecom District, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited , Sambalpur - 1 .
... 1st Party- Managements .
(And)
Their workman Sri Kar Nath Meher , S/o Late Sidheswar Meher, R/ o . Ward No. 2 , Po . Bargarh , Dist. Bargarh .
...2nd Party-Workman.
APPEARANCES:
Sri Suresh Ch . Nayak, Authorized Representative
: For the 1st Party- Management No. 1 & 2.
Shri Kedar Nath Meher
: ForHimself 2nd Party-Workman.
AWARD
The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour has referred an industrial dispute exisitng between the employers in relation to the management of D/o . Telecom , andtheir workman in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1) and sub -section ( 2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 vide its letter dated L-40012/7/2009 - IR(DU) , dated 19.3.2009.
2. The dispute referred to is as follows: ---
Whether the action of the management of the SDO , BSNL , Bargarh , Orissa, in terminating the services of their workman Shri Kedar Nath Meher with effect from 12.5.2006 is legal and justified ? If not , to what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?
3. The 2nd Party- workman in pursuance ofthe letter ofreference has filed his statement of claim and stated that he was engaged in M.D.F. for testing/wiring etc. in Telephone Exchange , Bargarh , with effect from 5.11.1998 and worked daily on regular basis without any break till 10.5.2006.He worked as per direction and under supervision ofT.T.A. and S.D.O. and Junior Telephone Officer on regular basis. His daily attendance was marked in telephone register maintained by Exchange Office, Bargarh . He was also issued a certificate regarding his working on 4.5.2001 . He was refused employment on 11.5.2006 without any reason and without giving any notice . He approached the S.D.O. for employment but nothing happened . Thereafter he filed a complaint before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) . His disengagement therefore be declared unjustified and illegal and he may be reinstated with back wages from 11.5.2006.
4. The 1st Party -Management No. 1 and 2 in their joint written statement denied the allegations made by the 2nd Party -workman and stated that the claimant Shri Kedar NathMeher was a labour on daily wages basing on need ofwork and as such question of termination of his services doesnot arise and the claimant is not entitled to any post. Paymentofmonthly salary to a labour on daily wages does not arise . No attendance register was maintained in the exchange fordaily wages labourer because they are neither regular staff nor their work is required regularly. The claimant had never worked continuously as a casual labour with effect from 5.11.1998 . He had not worked more than 240 daysfrom 5.11.1998 to 11.5.2006 continuously. Refusal of his service or service of any daily wages labour as and whenrequired basis is within the purview of the authority. No notice is required to be served on any daily wages labour for stoppage of work . The claimant has neither requested any office for allotment of work nor has any officer given assurances to him in this regard. Therefore his claim is liable to be dismissed.
5. Inhis rejoinder the 2nd Party - workman has stated that he had worked from 5.11.1998 continuously with more than240 days of work each year till 11.5.2006. He has also submitted certificate of T.T.A. Shri Achutanand Seth given on 15.3.2003 . He has signed on the daily telephone testing complaint register maintained in the complaint office . By terminating his service the Management has violated Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947.
6.Onthe pleadings of the parties follows issues were framed.
ISSUES
1. Whether the action of the Management of the S.D.O. , BSNL , Bargarh , Orissa in terminating the services of their workman Shri Kedar Nath Meher with effect from 12.5.2006 is legal and justified?
2. If not, to what relief of the workman is entitled ?
7. The 2nd Party- workman Shri Kedar Nath Meher has examined himself in evidence as W.W. - 1 and proved three documents marked as Ext . - 1 to 3 .
2654
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
8. The 1st Party -Management No. 1 and 2 havejointly examined Shri Sudhanshu Sekhar Mohanty and Sushil Pradhan on affidavits as M.W. - 1 and M.W. -2 and filed four documents .
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO . 1
9. From the pleadings of the parties an admitted case is made out that the 2nd Party - workman was engaged as a casual labour under the 1st Party - Management with effect from 5.11.1998 and worked there casually till 11.5.2006 . It has specifically been denied by the 1st Party - Management that the 2nd Party- workman had worked continuously from 5.11.1998 to 11.5.2000 and he had put in service for 240 dayscontinuously during the above period . The 2nd Party- workman has filed a photocopy of the certificate marked as Ext. - 1 with regard to his engagement in M.D.F. since January, 2001 as and when required basis and has also filed another certificate marked as Ext . -2 , which shows that the 2nd Party-workman has been working as casual worker since November, 1998 as and when required basis . If the certificates are taken to be correct on their face basis they do not certify that the 2nd Party - workman had worked continuously from 5.11.1998 to 15.2.2003 when the certificate Ext. - 1 was granted . Both these certificates denote that his service was required as and when where basis . The duty chart registers and fault testing register also , do not prove thatthe 2nd party- workman had worked with the 1st Party- Management continuously for 240 days during a period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of his disengagement . He has not filed any certificate showing break up of days of service he rendered year- wise under the 1st Party- Management . Hence it cannot be taken as granted that he had rendered 240 days of continuous service during a period of 12 calendar months from the date ofhis disengagement i.e. within one year back from 11.5.2006. His oral evidence in this regard is not sufficient . A casual worker cannot claim any benefit under section 25 -F of the Indsutrial Disputes Act, 1947 for his alleged termination of service by the 1st Party- Management unless he proves his continuous engagement during a period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of his alleged termination.
10, From the side of the 1st Party -Management it has been categorically stated through their witnesses that the 2nd witnesses that the 2nd Party - workman was never engaged for 240 days in calendar year prior to his alleged disengagement. There was nine regular staff for fault repair in Bargarh Exchange, but in time of emergency and natural calamities some labourers were called upon from the locality on daily wage basis to assist the employees of BSNL .
11 , Under their cicumstances the 2nd Party- workman cannot claim any right to reinstatement or re - employment . A casual worker has no legal right to claim continuation in hispresent post unless warranted by law. Here no case has been made out by the 2nd Party - workman for his reinstatement an other consequential benefits . Therefore the action ofthe Ist Party- Management ofthe S.D.O. , BSNL, Bargarh in terminating rather discontinuing the service of the 2nd Party-workman Shri Kedar Nath Meher with effect from 12.5.2006 cannot be challenged as being illegal and unjustified . The action of the 1st Party - Management is totally legal and justified . This issue is answered accordingly and against the 2nd Party-workman.
ISSUE NO . 2
12. In view of the findings recorded under Issue No. 1 of the workman is not entitled to any relief.
13. Reference is answered accordingly. JITENDRA SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2012
का०आ० 1084.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स इंटर नेशनल मिनरल इंड्रस्टीज निर्जरना के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय उदयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17/2/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं० एल-29012/10/2009- आई आर ( एम॰ ) ] जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 21st February, 2012
S.O. 1084.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No......10/ 2009 ...... ) ofthe Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court UDAIPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s International Mineral Industries Ltd , (Nizarana) , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21/02/2012 .
[No. L-29012/ 10/2009- IR( M) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary
अनुबंध केन्द्र सरकार प्रकरण सं० 10/2009 आई०टी०आर० मांगू इन्टरनेशनल मिनरल्स निझरना अधिसूचना नं/29012/ 10/2009 IR(M)
दिनांक-29/9/2009
निर्णय 17.11.2011 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2655 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012 /फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
प्रार्थी की ओर से कोई उपस्थित नहीं ।
अनुबंध
विपक्षी अभिभाषक श्री आर०एस० चौहान उपस्थित ।
CaseNo. 16/2010 , I.T.R. केन्द्र सरकार
अनवानः मुकेश मीणा S/o . बालजी मीणा Vs. प्र ० तिरुपति स्टोन लि
अधिसूचना नं L- 29012/ 94/2008 दिः 3/2/2009 प्रार्थी को रजिस्टर्ड ए/डी से तथा जिला न्यायालय राजसमन्द के माध्यम से अलग- अलग नोटिस भिजवाये गये थे । जो दोनों ही नोटिस तामिल हो चुके हैं, लेकिन उसके बावजूद भी प्रार्थी उपस्थित नहीं आया ।
नि०/4
निर्णय 16.11.2011 प्रार्थी उप. नहीं ।
यह प्रकाशन वर्ष 2009 में दर्ज किया गया था तथा प्रार्थी को काफी नोटिस भेजे गये जिसमें से कुछ बाद तामिल भी प्राप्त हुए, लेकिन इतनी लम्बी अवधि में भी प्रार्थी उपस्थित नहीं आया न ही कोई क्लेम आदि पेश किया है ।
काफी आवाजें दिलायी गयी समय 3.00 पी.एम. हो रहा है । प्रार्थी का नोटिस बाद तामील पूर्व में प्राप्त हो चुका है।
समय 3.10 हो चुके हैं , काफी आवाजें लगाई गई प्रार्थी अनुपस्थित है । ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि प्रार्थी को अपना क्लेग चलाने में कोई रुचि नहीं है ।
जब से प्रकरण दर्ज रजिस्टर किया गया है तब से आज तक प्रार्थी उपस्थित नहीं आया न ही उसकी ओर से कलेम ही पेश हुआ है, जिससे यह माना जायेगा कि प्रार्थी का अब विपक्षी से कोई विवाद शेष नहीं रहा है ।
उक्त परिस्थितियों में भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली द्वारा भेजे गये विवाद संख्या एल 29012/10/2009 दिनांक 29.09.2009 में कोई विवाद नहीं नो डिस्प्यूट अवार्ड ) पारित किया जाता है ।
अतः प्रकरण में नोडिस्प्यूट अवार्ड " कोई विवाद नहीं" का पंचाट पारित किया जाता है ।
सूचना भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय को भेजी जाये ।
सूचना प्रकाशनार्थ भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय को भेजी जावे ।
पत्रावली में अब कोई कार्यवाही शेष नहीं है । अतः पत्रावली फैसल शुमार होकर दाखिल दफ्तर हो ।
पत्रावली फैसल शुमार होकर दाखिल दफतर हो ।
आदेश सुनाया गया ।
ह०/- (अपठनीय)
ताराचन्द सोनी, न्यायाधीश
नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2012
नई दिल्ली. 21 फरवरी, 2012
का०आ० 1086.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स सी गोव लिमिटेड गोवा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21/2/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
का० आ० 1085. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स तिरुपति स्टोन प्रा० लि० उदयपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय उदयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2010 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21/2/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था
[सं० एल-29011/28 / 2008- आई आर ( एम ) ] [सं० एल -29012/94/2008- आई आर ( एम ) ]
जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव जौहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2012
New Delhi , the 21st February, 2012
S.O. 1086. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No ......... .3/2009 ..... ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Mumbai- 2 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Sesa Goa Ltd. (Goa) and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21/02/2012
S.O. 1085.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ) , ( 14 of 1947 ) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No..................16/2010 .....) ofthe Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court UDAIPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Tirupati Stone Pvt. Ltd. (Udaipur) and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21/02/2012.
[FileNo. L-29011 /28/2008 - IR (M) ] Johan Topno , Under Secretary, [File No. L-29012/94/2008 - IR(M) ] Johan Topno , Under Secretary 2656
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAI
PRESENT
K.B. Katake Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/3 OF 2009
EMPLOYERS IN RELATIOΝ ΤΟ ΤΗΣ ΜΑNAGEMENT
OF
M/ S . SESA GOALTD .
The Managing Director
24. EDCComplex Patto, Panaji
Sesa Goa Ltd. SesaGher Goa-403 001 .
AND THEIR WORKMEN .
The General Secretary United Mine Workers Union G-5 ,MacadoAppt . Tisk Ponda Goa.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. Girish Sardessai , Advocate.
FOR THE WORKMAN
Mr.P.Gaonkar, Representative .
Mumbai , dated the 3rd January, 2012.
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employmentby its Order No. L-29011 / 28 /2008 - IR (M) , dated 29.01.2009 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of M/s . Sesa Goa Ltd. , in not discussingthe Charter of Demands dated 10/2/2008 served on them by United Mine Workers Union who is claiming the majority status in the establishment of Codi Mines of the management is legal and justified? To what relief the union is entitled for ? "
2. After receipt of the reference from the Ministry of Labour, both the parties appeared in the reference in response to the service of notices . The second party Union filed its statement of claim at Ex- 6 . According to it, the second party union is a Registered Trade Union
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
representing vast majority of mine workers in Goa and at Codli Mine . The first party is a company engaged in mining industry having world wide export market and earning huge profits . There are at present around 350 permanent workers employed by first party in various categories at Codli Mine. The firstparty has started indulging in various unfair labour practices at their Codli Mine and the management's sponsered union was hand - in - gloves with the management and has never raken any steps to protect the rights and bonfits of the workers. With the help of so called internal union Sesa Cioa Workers Union , the management has started harassing the workers who were agitating against the unfair labour practice . The workers who have taken initiative to protect against such unfair labour practices were singled out and on false charges their services were tenninated without coducting any inquiry . The management's sponsored union is in collusion with the management . Thus they did not raise any dispute for wages for the period of iliegal suspension operations and illegal lockout . The company has started indulging in various unfair labour practices in violation of provisions ofMine's Act, Payment of Wages Act and Contract Labour Act . The fust party is not maintaining overtime register. There are no proper safety agreements at the workplace especially the internal roads are not as per the provisions of the Mines Act. There is no lighting arrangement specially the employer is running second and third shifts at mining pits . The internal union was in collusion with the management thereforethey did not take any action against unfair labour practices . Therefore the vast majority of workers working at Codli Minedecidedto join with the second party union . Accordingly the second party union has a vast majority.
3. On 5/8/2007 General Body Meeting was held. They unanimously elected local committee . The names of local committee and its office bearers were conveyed to the first party vide their letter dt . 6/8/2007 . On receipt of the information about joining of new union by the workmen, Director of the Company Mr. M.D. Phal and Sr. Mines Manager Mr. Joseph Coelho of first party addressed the workers in training room and informed them not to join second party union otherwise action would be taken against them . They also informed that management will not recognize any other union except Sesa Goa Workers Union .
4.As the workers were harassed by the first party, they did not withdraw their membership of second paty union. The first party started harassing and pressuring and adopting unfair labour practices against the workers . Office bearer Suraj Naik , Secretary of Local Commitee of the union was transferred . He was directed to report at Chitradurg in Karnataka State . Mines Manager, Joseph asked one of the workers to collect signatures of other workers on a letter drafted by him . When he refused, he was also transferred to Chitradurg , Karnataka. Thereafter MinesManager called Mr. Joaquim on phone and asked him to sign the letter addressed to President , Sesa Goa
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933 2657
Workers Union and promised to withdraw his transfer order as small number of workers were not parties to it . The
and obtained his signature on the said paper. Majority validity of the settlementdt . 20/11/2008 between
workers refused to sign the paper given by the management management and workmen representedby Sesa Goa
and management continued to issue transfer order to other WorkersUnion is not challenged . The same is legal and
localcommittee members and active members ofthe union valid as it is accepted by majority of workmen . Thus it is
in order to harass and victimise them. They started calling binding on all . According to them refusal to discuss the
members of the union one by one and were asking them to charter ofdemands or the claim as to the recognition as a
sign . Those who refused to sign ; they were transferred majority union is not an industrial dispute . The reference
from Codli Mine .
made by Governinent is of total non application of mind
5. Inspite ofpressure from the management , workers and deserves to be rejected . The settlement dt . 20/11/2008
did not withdraw from the unity of the union. They have with Sesa Goa Workers Union is just , fair and proper and
asked some office bearers to resign from the union. However the subject matter in the present matter have been
they refused. In order to victimize the active ur: ion office conclusively settled by the said settlement . The first party
bearers and members , Mr. Pondory Naik was aksed to resign denied that second party union is representing the majority
from the United Mine Workers Union. When he refused, workers . They denied all the allegations that the Sesa Goa
he was transferred from Codli Mine . According to the Workers Union is a management sponsored union . As per
second party out of 383 workmen working at Codli Mine, the constitution of Sesa goa Workers Union , it represents
314workmenjoined the second party union in July, August the workers employed in the company in Sesa Goa Ltd.
2007. The workmen were covered by setilement dt. 22/ 12/ working on land, transport , mining , workshop , stores ,
2004 which was to expire on 31/3/2008 . Hence in order to sampling and analysis , laboratory work. survey and
give sufficient time to the management, union submitted prospecting , bundars , office staff at Head office, R.F.
charter of demand vide its letter dt . 10/2/2008 . The second Shipping Department , and R.F. Workshop , Barge
party has raised number of demands in respect of better Constructions Project . It also represents workers of
living condition for workmen , higher wages , a wage Beneficiations plant , Amona , Pig Iron Plant, Amona and
structure nearing a living wage , etc. The union has taken Met coke Division, Armona Workers union represents all
into consideration the paying capacity of the company. the workers in the above establishments . They have arrived
at the settlement in respect of the employees . The said
6. Inspite of receipt of charter of demand the first settlement is binding on all they have denied ali the
party did not call the second party union for discussion on allegations made in the statement of claim. According to
the charter ofdemands and hence dispute was raised before them, they are not bound to discuss the charter of demand
ALC( C) . The second party's representatives attended the made by the second party. Therefore they pray that the
conciliation proceedings however ne body from the reference deserves to be rejected.
management attended the conciliation proceeding .
Therefore conciliation failed and ALC ( C) made a report to 8. Following are the issues for my determination . I
the Ministry and Ministry has sent the reference to this record iny findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
Tribunal . The second party union therefore prays that Sr. No. Issues
Findings
action of the first party not discussing the charter of
demanddt . 10/2/2008 with the second party union be 1. Whether decision of management in not Yes.
declared illegal , unjustified and bad in law . They pray for discussing charter ofdemanddt . 10.2.2008
declaration that the demands made in the charter be with the union claiming majority status in
declared genuine and reasonable and the same be granted the establishment of Codli Mines is legal
in toto from 1/4/2008 . andjustified?
7.The first party company has resisted the statement 2. Whether the dispute under reference is No.
of claim vide its written statement at Ex- 10 . According to an industrial dispute?
them, the company has signed settlementdt . 20/11/2008 3. What relief the union is entitled to ? No relief.
with Sesa Goa Workers Union which is a registered union
representing a majority of workers of the first party REASONS
company. The second party union represents minority of Issues Nos . 1 to 3 :-
workers and has no locus - standi as a sole bargaining agent .
On this ground, reference deserves to be rejected. They 9. Ali these issues are interlinked . Therefore inorder
further submitted that reference is vague and bad in law, to avoid repetition of discussion, they are discussed and
not capable ofadjudication . The charter of demand cannot decided simultaneously. In this respect the second party
bediscussedwith minority union . The demand to that effect union submitted that the first party company has not
isultra-virus . The settlement arrived at by the majority has discussed the charter of demand with them though they
to be presumedjust and fair and the same cannot be ignored are representing the majority of workmen in the Codli
Mines . In this respect, the learned representative of the
2658
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
second party submitted that any body, even a minority union also can raise industrial dispute and all the workmen need not raise the dispute. In support of his argument, the Id. Representative of the second party union resorted to Apex Court ruling in Indian Oxygen Ltd. V/s . Workmen Indian Oxygen Karmachari Union CDJ 1979 SC 156 wherein on the point Hon'ble Court observed that:
The expression "workman " has been defined in clause z of Seciton 2 to mean speaking generally, "any person" employed in any industry in the capacity therein. There is nothing in the act to require that the dispute or difference should be raised by all the workmen of the industry, or everyone ofthem or even by a majority ofthem. It is enough if the controversy is between the employer on the one side and the workman on the other. So also there is noting in the act to require that the workmen raising the controversy should form a majority ofthe employees. "
10. The L.d. Adv. also resorted to another Apex Court ruling in Tata Chemicals Ltd. & workmen 1978 II LLJ 22 wherein Hon'ble Court held that:
"A minority union can validly raise and industrial dispute as Section 2( k) does not restrict the ambit of the definition of industrial dispute to a dispute between an employer and a recognised majority union but takes within its wide sweep any dispute or difference between employer and workmen including anminority union " .
In this respect the Id . Adv. for the first party has pointed out that the first party has settlement with the majority union . It is binding on all the workmen . Therefore the other union cannot raise any dispute . In this respect the Id. Representative of the second party submitted that the settlement taken place is not a bonafide settlement . Infact the management has entered into settlement with pro -management group of workers . Therefore the settlement is not binding on them. In support ofhis argument the Id . Representative of the second party resorted toApex Court ruling in National Engineering Industries Ltd. V/s State of Rajasthan and others 2000 I LLJ SC 247 wherein the Hon'ble Court on the point observed that :
" Industrial dispute can be raised where settlement is not bonafide or arrived at on account of fraud , misrepresentation or concealment of facts or corruption or other inducements . "
11. The Id . Representative of the second party also submitted that the settlement arrived at outside the conciliation proceeding is not binding on all the workmen or the workmen who are not signatories . In support ofhis argument, the Id adv. restored to the following rulings . 1) National Engg. Industries Ltd. V/s . State 2000 ( 1) LLJ 247(SC) . 2) Hindustan Lever Mazdoor Sabha V/ s HUL
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
Ltd. 2005 (2) LLJ 637 (BOM).
12. On the point Ld . Adv. for the first party submitted that the management does not dispute the facts or the law laid down in the above rulings . According to them , infact there is no industrial dispute as such . He submitted that not discussing charter of demand with a union or a group ofworkers cannot be industrial dispute . In the case at hand, neither services of any worker is at state nor any promotion or increment is disputed . He further submitted that in the case at hand, the second party has not come with any specific demand in respect of wages or any other problem ofworkers . He further submitted that the union herein is claiming that the management has refused to discuss the charter of demand with them. They have not contended thatthe management has rejected any oftheir demand either inrespect ofpay and wages or of other service terms and conditions of the workmen . The ld. adv. submitted that merely not discussing the charter of demand cannot be an industrial dispute .
13. In this respect the Id . Representative of the second party submitted that the I.D. Act does not contemplate that a dispute would come in to existence in any particular manner and such a dispute raised by the union canbe termed as industrial dispute . In support ofhis argument the Id . adv. resorted to Apex Court ruling in Shambhunath GoyalV /s. Bank of Baroda, Gullandur 1978 I LLJ 484 ( SC) wherein the Hon'ble Court observed that:
"A mere perusal of definition would show that where there is a dispute or difference between the parties contemplated by the definition and the dispute or difference is connected with the employment or non- employment or the terms of the employment or with the conditions of labour of any person , there comes into existence an industrial dispute . The Act no where contemplates that the dispute would come into existence in any particular, specific or prescribed manner. "
14. The Id. Representative of the second party also resortedtoMadras High Court ruling in M/ s Ramkrishna Meals Ltd. V/ s . Government of Tamil Nadu and others 1984 II LLJ 259 ( MAD DB) wherein the Hon'ble Court on the point observed that:
"There cannot be a doubt that for the existence of an industrial dispute, there ought to be a demand by the workman and a refusal to grant it by the management. How demand should be raised should not and could not be a legal notion of fixity and rigidity. The grievance of the workman and the demandfor its redressal must be communicated to themanagement . "
Inthis respect the Id . adv. for the first party pointed out that the second party union has not made any specific demand . Their demand is that the management shouldbe [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2659 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
directed to discuss the charter ofdemand . Neither it can be calleddemand nor it amount to industrial dispute.
grievance . Such a right cannot be made available tominority union when even the majority union has no such right and hence there is no question of any discrimination or arbitrariness in denying such rights to the minority union. "
15. The Id . Representative of the second party also resorted to Karnataka High Court ruling in Mico Employees Association V/s . State of Karnataka 1987 I LLJ 300 (KARN) wherein the Hon'ble High Court observed that:
"Serving charter of demand on management does not result in industrial dispute. Industrial dispute arises only on rejection of such demands ."
17. In the case at hand , the second party union has not claimed any specific grievance or any right in respect of employees regarding their employment and/ or non- employment having direct and substantial interest . On the other hand the union herein is seeking for redressal to ascertain its rights to discuss the charter of demand alleged to have submitted to the management . Mere right to discuss charter of demand does not fall in the ambit of industrial dispute. In this backdrop , conclusion can be arrived at that the dispute under reference is not an industrial dispute . So also I hold that the decision of the management in not discussing the charter of demand with the second party is legal and justified . Accordingly I decide the issue no . 1 in the affirmative and issue no . 2 in the negative . Consequently the issue no. 3 is also required to be answered in the negative that the second party union is not entitled to get any relief. In the light of discussions and findings on issues nos . 1 to 3 , the reference deserves to be rejected . Thus I proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
In this respect the Id . adv. for the first party management submitted that it is not the case of the second party that the management has rejected their demands . The second party has sought for direction to discuss the charter of demand with them . The Id . adv. submitted that such a demand does not amount to industrial dispute as contemplated under I.D. Act . The Ld . Representative of the second party also resorted to following rulings ( 1 ) The Associated Cement Staff Union V/s . State of Maharashtra & Ors . in Writ Petition no . 1310 of 2008 Bombay High Court; ( 2)All India Port & Dock Workers Federation V/ s . UOI , 1989 II LLJ 600 ( BOM) ; ( 3) Indian Airlines V/s . Indian Airlines Technical Assistants Union 1996 3 ALT 1015 ( Andhra DB) ; 4) Tata Consulting Engineers V/s A.C. Doshi 1999 ( 4) BCR 470. All these rulings are in respect ofdemands of union and settlement thereof.
cost. The reference stands rejected with no order as to Date: 03.01.2012
K.B. Katake, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2012
16. In this respect Id . adv. for the first party submitted thatin the reference at hand , no specific demand is placed by the union. Their demand is that , the management should discuss the charter of demand with the union . The Id . Adv. for the first party further submitted that by making such a prayer, the second party union is indirectly making a prayer to recognize them as a majority union which is not an industrial dispute . In support of his argument the Id . Adv. resorted to Madras High Court ruling in Puducherry Shasun Chemicals & Drugs Niruvana Thozhilalargal Muneetra Sangam & Anr. V/ s Labour Officer & Ors . 2010 II CLR 334 wherein the Hon'ble Court in para 7 of the judgement observed that :
का०आ० 1087.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स डेक्कन मिनरल्स प्रा० लि० मुम्बई के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय न० 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 37/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.02.2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"The Courts time and again held that the grant of recognition of the union cannot be brought under Section 2 (k) of the Industrial Dispute Act and it cannot be subject matter of the industrial dispute. "
[सं० एल -29012/34/2005- आई आर ( एम ) ] जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2012
Inthis respect the Id . adv. for the first party submitted that recognition of union is not a statutory right. Even the majority union has no right to represent its members for collective bargaining or individual grievance . In support of his argument, the Id. adv. resorted to the Apex Court ruling in Chairman SBI & anr. V/s All Orissa State Bank Officer's Association & Anr. 2003 III CLR 281 wherein the Hon'ble Court observed that :
S.O. 1087.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. .... 37/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Mumbai - 2 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s Deccan Minerals Pvt . Ltd (Mumbai ) " There bring no common law on right ofa trade union to represent its members whether for the purpose of collective bargaining or individual
186 GI /2012-23 and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21/02/2012 .
[No. L- 29012/34/2005 - IR(M) ] JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secretary
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAI
PRESENT :
K. B. Katake, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/37 OF 2006
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S DECCAN MINERALS PVT. LTD.
2.After receipt of the reference from the Ministry. both the parties appeared through their legal representatives . The second party workman filed his statement of claim vide Ex - 9 . According to him , the first party appointed him as Public Relation Officer by their letter dated 30/6/2004 for a probation period of three months . His salary was fixed Rs . 5000/- p.m. He was posted at Redi Complex and his Headquarter was at Vengurla in Maharashtra State. The nature of his work was to be explained by an officer at Redi . However neither name of the officer was given to him nor anybody gave him any instructions about the nature of his work . He was carrying out the work of taking out copies of 7/12 extracts from Talati Office . He used to attend office of Taluka Nirikshak Bhoomi Abileka . Taking out copies of mutations , index extract and used to check the landlords and owners of the lands . He was doing purely clerical work as like clerks in Government and Semi Govt offices .
The Chairman, M/s. Deccan Minerals Pvt . Ltd. 16, Nirmal Building Nariman Point Mumbai-400021 .
AND
THEIR WORKMAN
Shri A.B. Masarkar , C/ o . Shri Kavale Pradeep Opp . Sai Darbar Hall Sundar Bhatle , Vengurla Tal Vengurla Distt . Sindhudurg .
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER
3. As the work of the second party workman was satisfactory, he was confirmed in the service by the letter of first partydt . 29/12/2004 and his salary was fixed at Rs. 7000/- p.m. w.e.f. January 2005. He was re -designated asAdministrative Officer . However he was doing the same clerical work. He was to be provided with cabin and phone . Hewas authorized to sign cheques . However concerned officer, Mr. Madhu Rane did not provide him cabin or phone . On the other hand he was jealous as workman was promoted as Administrative Officer . Charge of administrative officer was also not given to him and he was asked to do the same work which he was doing earlier. According to the second party, by a letter dated 21.01.2005 abruptly he was terminated from service with immediate effect alleging that he was doing anti company activities and divulging company's secretsto outsiders. However the particulars thereof were not given to him.
: Mr. N.H. Samant & Mr. S.R. Ogale , Advocates .
FOR THE WORKMAN : Mr. P.V. Bovalekar, Advocate.
Mumbai , dated the 6th January , 2012
AWARD
1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employnientby its Order No. L-29012/34/2005 - IR ( M) dated 16/06/2006 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
4. He further contended that , the company has terminated his services with out conducting any inquiry and without following the procedure . The allegations leveled against him were false . The termination letter was hand written by Mr. Rane and signed by Mr. C.B. Saxena , the Manager Legal who had no authority to terminate the services of any employee . No opportunity was given to the workman . His services were terminated illegally in violation of principles of natural justice. Charges leveled against him were false . The illegal termination caused him mental agony. Members of his family also suffered a lot who were dependent on his earnings . The workman therefore , prays that the order of termination of his services be declared illegal , unjustified and improper and he be reinstated with full back - wages since 21/01/2005 and his service be treated as continuous and also prays for cost and compensation for mental agony.
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Deccan Minerals Pvt. Ltd. In terminating the employment of Sh. A.B. Masurkar w.e.f. 21/1/2005 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for? "
5. The first party management resisted the statement of claim vide its written statement at Ex - 12. According to [ भाग !! -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
2661
them, the statement of claim and the reference are
wholly misconceived , false , frivolous , baseless and withdrawing complaints to police authorities on
untenabie . According to them , Mr. A.B. Masurkar behalf of the company. ( 6) Several employees were
second party is not ' workman' as defined under working below him in hierarchy and they were
reporting to him .
Section 2( s) of the industrial Disputes Act 1947.
Therefore this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to 8. Theposition of second party was one oftrust and
entertain this reference . The company is engaged in confidence ofthe company. However it was revealed that
mining business , producing iron ore at three leased second party was not discharging his duties properly and
mines in Sindhudurg Districts nearby Redi Port. inthe interest of company and thereby, causing financial
6. The second party was initially appointed as losses to the company in the matter of dealing with
Public Relation Officer in Tal. Vengurla and landlords , apart from causing damage to the reputation of
Swantwadi , Distt. Sindhudurg on probation of three the company etc. There were number of complaints from
months on consolidated salary of Rs . 5000 /- p.m. His the land owners , contractors and others . Second party was
probation was orally extended by another three advised to protect the interest of the company. Inspite of
months . He was confirmed w.e.f. 1/1/2005 on the salary that he did not take care to protect the interest of the
of Rs . 7000/- p.m. His duties and reponsibilities were company. Therefore the company lost faith in the second
delegated to him by the management . The second party and he was relieved from the services of the company w.e.f. 21/01/2005 .
party was provided with separate cabin and
telephone facility. Company car used to pickup him 9.According to the first party, the second party was
from his residence and drop him in the officer and advised to meet the Sarpanch , Tahsildar, Police officers ,
vice - versa . So also he used a travel in company's car Bank officers , Post officials of village Redi , medical officers
to go to Government offices . He was exclusively and others who , he was required to deal with in his day to
given responsibility of getting cleared all the day work. He was provided with company car with driver
company's matter from the authorities in Taluka and of visit these places and get acquanted with them for the
District places including Ministry of Mines. He was interest ofthe company. They denied that the second party
required to Keep harmonious relation with the was askedto collect 7/12 cxtracts and other documents
workmen of the company at Redi and Sateli and froni Talati Office as has been alleged . According to them ,
Condura Mine area and with the outsiders who visit Field Assistant Mr. D ' Souza was collecting such
the company office . He was representating the documents . They denied that the second party was doing
company and acting on its behalf as part of purely clerical work as has been alleged. The second party
management team . He was assigned and entrusted has written various letters to Sarpanch Gram Panchayat
important task of shifting of high tension line at Sateli Sateli requesting permission to erect diesel pump and to
Working Mine and getting a power connection of arrange meeting with Gram Panchayat members . He has
200 KW at Sateli Mine by 15/1/2005 by pursuing and also written letter to Vengurla Police Station complaining
representing various authorities for and on behalf that some temporary workers were onstructing the work.
ofthe company . He was also entrusted the important He alsowrote complaint letter to Redi Police Station. The
assignment of getting cleared various matters of the work of second party was not clerical but he was working
compnay in different levels of State Government and as an adminstrative officer and performing duties of
other concerned authorities at the earliest . He was managerial nature . They denied all the allegations made in
authorized by the management to sign cheques on dismissed with cost . the statement of claim and pray that the reference be
behalf of the company for the purpose of withdrawal
of money remitted from Mumbai office for 10. My Ld. Predecessor has framed the following
and Sateli Mines . distribution in connection with the working at Redi
issues for my determination . I record my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
7. In exercise of this powers , duties and Sr.No. Issues
responsibilities the second party had made various Findings
written representations / letters to ( 1 ) Police (i ) Whether the second party is a ' workman' Yes
Inspector , Vengurla Police Station ( 2 ) For no as defined under Section 2 ( s ) of the I.D.
objection certificate from Gram Panchayat Office . (3 ) Act?
Holding meeting with concerned officials of Gram (ii) Whether termination of the second party No.
Panchayat and concerned land owners for getting islegal andjustified?
no objection certificate , (4 ) Representation to
Development Officers of concerned districts for (iii) If not, whether he is entitled Asper final order.
obtaining clearance for installation of diesel pump for reinstatement ?
at the site of mines of the company, (5) Marking/ ( iv) What order ? Asper final order.
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2662
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
REASONS
Issue no . (i) :-
managerial duties as Administrative Officer. His pay was Rs . 7000/- p.m. In the circumstances Id Adv. submitted that the second party was an officer exercising managerial functions . Therefore according to him , the second party cannot be termed as ' workman' as defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act .
13. In support of his argument the Id. Adv. resorted toApex Court ruling in HR Adyanthaya etc. V/s . Sandoz (India) Ltd. etc. 1994 II CLR 552 wherein the Hon'ble Court on the point observed that-
"Hence the position in the law as it obtains today is that a person to be a workman under the I.D. Act must be employed to do the work of any of the categories , viz. manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory and it is not enough that he is not covered by either ofthe four exceptions to the definition. "
11. It is the case of the first party that the second party was appointed and working as an officer. He was performing managerial functions . Therefore he was note a 'workman' as defined under Section 2 ( s) of the I.D. Act 1947. In this respect the first party relied on the two appointment letters Ex - 54 & 55. As per Ex- 54, the second partywas appointed as a Public Relation Officer for keeping good relations with the concerning authorites in Taluka level and district place in Sindhudurg District . In this letter it ismentioned that the nature of work will be explained by Redi office . His headquarter was Vengurla and his actual travelling expenses were to be paid every fortnight on submission of bill to Mumbai office . His consolidated monthly salary was fixed Rs . 5000/-p.m. and after completion ofprobation period satisfactorily he was to get consolidated salary of Rs . 7000/ - p.m. As per confirmation letter dated 29/12/2004 (Ex- 55 ) , as the second party has completed the probation period satisfactorily , he was appointed as Administrative Officer with other responsibilities mentioned in the separate letter . His pay was fixed Rs . 7000/- p.m.
The Ld. Adv. also referred to Delhi High Court ruling in Tata Sons Ltd. V/s . S Bandopadhyay & anr. 2004 LLR 506 wherein the Hon'ble court observed that an employee engaged in a senior position e.g. Deputy Manager, Engineering and being highly qualified cannot claim to have the status of workman under Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act. In the light of this observation the Id. Adv. submitted that the second party herein was appointed as Administrative Officer. Therefore he also cannot be termed as a workman as defined under Section 2 ( s) of I.D. Act . The Id. Adv. also submitted that the burden is on the employee to prove that he is a workman . In support of his argument he cited Bombay High Court ruling in A.K. Patel & etc. V/s . The Indian Hotels Co. ltd . 2005 LLR 663 wherein ihe Hon'ble court observed that :
"Burden of poof to establish as to whether an employee is a workman or not, lies on the workman "
14. The Id. Adv . submitted that the second party herein has not led any evidence to show that he was doing mere clerical work and was not functioning in managerial cadre.Accordingto him , he was recruited and confirmed in the cadre of officer and was performing the managerial duties . The Id . Adv further submitted that his duty list is givenin the letter Ex. 85 the Id. Adv. also resorted to another Apex Court ruling in Inthru Noronha V/s . Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. 2005 (2) MHLJ 884 (BOM) wherein theHon'ble Court on the point observed that:
"The important thing for the court is to evaluate the position ofan employee with reference to the nature ofhis duty in context of his businesss where those duties are performed. "
On the point Id . Adv. also resorted to Apex Court ruling in S.K. Mining V/s. Carona Sahu Co. Ltd. & Ors . 1994 II CLR 359 wherein to determine the question whether employee is a workman , the Hon'ble Court observed that:
12. In this respect, according to the second party neither duty list was given to him nor anybody explained him about his duties as a Public Relation Office or Administrative Officer. He was not given charge of either ofthe posts and he was doing clerical work. According to him , he used to collect 7/12 extracts and other documents from Talati Office and office of TILR etc. and was doing other clerical work. In this respect the Id. Adv. for the first party submitted that as per the appointment letter Ex- 54 and confirmation letter Ex - 55 , the second party was initially appointed as Public Relation Officer. As he has completed the probation period satisfactorily, he was appointed as Administrative Officer with other responsibilities as per separate letter issued on 29/12/2004 . The separate letter dated 29/12/2004 is on record at Ex.85 . It is an exhaustive letter explaining the responsibilities and duties of the second party. The Ld. Adv. for the first party also referred the office copies ofthe letters signed and sent by the second party in the capacity as a Public Relation Officer . The first letter dated 20/10/2004 was addressed to Sarpanch for NOC to install diesel pump set . It is at Ex - 60 . Exhibit - 61 is another letter addressed to Sarpanch, Sateli for calling meeting of the members ofthe Gram Panchayat . Third letter Ex - 62 is written to the Police Inspector, Vengurla Police Station complaining about abstruction to the work of the compnay. Another letter Ex- 63 was written by the second party to Head Constable, Redi Police Station making compliant about obstruction to the work of the company by some temporary employees . From these documents , the Id . Adv . for the first party submitted that the second party was not a workman. On the other hand he was appointed as Public Relation officer. Subsequently he was confirmed in the service as Administrative Officer. He was performing 2663 {भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
respect further I would like to point out that he was appointed as a public relation officer from 30/6/2004 .He was confirmed in the service and appointed as Administrative officer w.e.f. 1/1/2005 as reflected from his appointment letter Ex-55 . 21 days thereafter i.e. on 21 / 1 / 2005 by letter Ex-56 his services came to be terminated with immediate effect . It shows that he was Adminsitrative Officer only for 21 days . As a Public Relation Officer, he was doing clerical work of writing letters manually to various authorities for permission , complaints etc. There appears substance in the version of the second party that he was never given charge of administrative officer as his services were terminated immediately 21 days after his appointment to the said post . In this backdrop looking in to the fact that he was doing his office work manually. Even letters written by him were hand written letters indicates that he was a workman as defined under Section 2(s) ofthe I.D. Act .
"Whether or not an employee is a workman under Section 2(s) ofI. D. Act is required to be determined with reference to his principal nature ofduties and functions such question is required to be detemined with reference to the facts and circumstances ofthe case and material on record and it is not possible to lay down any straight jacket formula which can decide the dispute as to the real nature of duties andfunctions being performed by an employee in all cases when an employee is employed to do the type of work enumerated in the definition of workman under Section 2 (s) , there is hardly any difficulty in treating him as a workman under the appropriate classification, but in the complexity of commercial and industrial organizations quite a large number ofemployees are often required to do more than one kind ofwork. In such cases it becomes necessary to determine under which classification the employee will fall for the purpose ofdeciding whether he comes within the definition of workman or goes out of it. "
16. In this respest I would also like to refer Apex court ruling in S.K. Verma V/s . Mahesh Chandra and Anr (1983) 4 SCC 214 wherein the Hon'ble Court in respect of Development Officer observed that ;
that; In the same case the Hon'ble court further observed
:
"The designation of an employee is not ofmuch of importance and what is important is the nature of duties performed by the employee. The determinative factor is the main duties of the employee concerned and not some works incidentally done . " .
"Thescale ofpay as well as the authorities competent to appoint and take disciplinary action indicates that the appellant'Development Officer ' is no more than a glorified designation . Development officers are separated from 'officers ' strictly so called and are generallyplaced on par with sub- ordinates and clerical staff"
In the same para Hon'ble Court observed that ;
"Notwithstanding the designation, the Tribunal or Couri must look to the nature of his duties to discover what precisely a Development Officer is. "
In this judgement Hon'ble Court helf that the Development officer is a workman within the meaning of Section 2 ( s) of I.D. Act.
17. I would also like to refer another Apex Court ruling in National Engineering Industries Ltd. V/s . Shri Kishan Bhagaria and Ors . AIR 1998 SC 329. In that case in respect of internal Auditor of the Company, the Hon'ble Court observbed in para 9 of the judgement that;
"His duties were mainly reporting and checking on behalf ofthe management . A reporter or a checking clerk is not a supervisor. The respondent herein does not appear to us doing any kind of supervisory work. He was undoubtedly checking up on behalf ofthe employer but he had no independent right or authority to take diecision and his decision did not bind the company " .
Inthis matter, the Hon'ble Court unheld the decision of Division Bench of the High court declaring the respondent no . 1 therein as a workman .
15. In this repect I would like to point out that the second party herein was designated as Administrative officer and drawing pay of Rs . 7000 /-p/m However he was not empowered to take independent decision binding on the compnay. On the other hand from the copies of letters on record he has sent to Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Police Inspector and to the polic Head Constable , it is revealed that all these letters are on the letter head of the first party company. However these letter Ex- 60 , 61 , 62 & 63 are handwritten letters sent by the second party to the concerned officials . From these letters Ex -60 to 63 it is revealed that though the second party was designated as Administrative officer neither he was provided with a Computer nor even provided with typewriter or typist. From these letters it appears that the second party has sent all 'nese handwritten letters . He has manually prepared these Letters and set to the concerned authorities in a capacity as public relation officer. In the age of laptop and computers the second party was not even supplied with typewriter or atypist. On the other hand it seems that he was doing all his work manually, writing all the letters and other correspondence in his own hand writing . From this fact of hand written letters by the second party the claim of the first party does not stand to reasons that the second party vas appointed as officer . The claim of the first party is also unacceptable that he was given a separate cabin and telephone and office car was also given to him etc. In this 2664
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
18. In the case at hand , though the workman herein was designated as Administrative Officer and his pay was Rs . 7000/ - p.m. , he had no independent power to take decision .He was also not empowered to bind the company by his decisions . He was doing clerical work, writing letters manually to various persons for permission and seeking protection to the workers etc. He was doing all his work manually. Therefore , merely designating him as an officer is not sufficient to say that he was doing supervisory or managerial duties . Infact his duties were of clerical nature . In the light of ratio laid down in the above rulings , I come to the conclusion that looking into the work and duties of the second party, he comes in the definition of 'workman' within the meaning of Section 2(s ) of I.D. Act 1947 . Accordingly, I decide this issue no . 1 in the affirmative .
Issue no . 2: --
party against the second party that he was acting against the interest of the company and had caused loss to the company. In this respect I would also point out that though the workman was confirmed in the services , he had worked with the company less than seven months . Neither he was well acquainted with the officials nor with the functioning ofthe company. The companydoes not want his services anymore therefore they have terminated his services forthwith since 21/01/2005. Since then the second party is not in service with the first party. On the other hand inter- serelations between the parties are strained. Furthermore , the service of the workman was very short with the first party. Instead of reinstatement, I therefore think it proper to award compensation to the second party workman from the first party. View to that effect is taken by Hon'ble Apex Court in Gaziabad Development Authority and anr. V/s . Ashok Kumar and anr. 2008 I LLJ 1013 ( SC). In that case the termination of workman was held not legal as they were terminated without complying with the provisions ofUP Industrial Disputes Act . In that case the Hon'ble Apex Court observed that;
"In the circumstances of the case, that compensatuion of Rs . 50,000/- instead of reinstatement should be paid to the respondent . "
The same view is reiterated by Apex Court in UP state Electricity Board V/s . Laxmikant Gupta 2009 I LLJ 593 (SC) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court observed that;
"Now there is no hard andfast principle that on the termination of services being found to be illegal, the normal rule is reinstatement with backwages . Compensation can be awarded instead at the discretion of the labour court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. " 19. On this issue theld. Adv. for the first party submitted that the second party had not worked continuously for 240 days . Therefore he cannot claim protection or permanency in the service . In this respect the fact is not disputed that the workman was appointed as Public Relation Officer on 30.6.2004. He worked as a Public Relation Officer till 29-12-2004 . Thereafter he was appointed as Administrative Officer till 21-01-2005 when his services came to be terminated . Even according to the workman he has not worked for 240 days . However he is claiming that he has worked for more than 190 days . Therefore he is entitled to get the benefit of permanency. According to him, the first party is dealing in mining, therefore , continuous work for 190 days suffice the purpose to get permanency. However the rule of 190 days is applicable to the workers who are working under-ground mining and not to the others . The fact herein is not disputed that the second party has not worked for 240 days continuously. However in the case at hand the second party was confirmed in the service as per letterdt. 29-12-2004 (Ex -55) . Not only he was confirmed in the service but was also re -designated as anAdministrative Officer. Therefore , now the first party cannot raise the plea that the workman or the employee has not worked continuously for 240 days . He was confirmed in the service . He is a workman as held in issue no. I herein above . Therefore his services cannot be terminated without following the procedure of law prescribed therefore , such as ; initiating departmental inquiry for the charges of misconduct etc. No dubt the services of the workman was terminated illegally as neither he was charged- sheeted nor any departmental inquiry was commenced against him . Accordingly I decide this issue no . 2 in the negative that the termination order is not legal andjustified.
Issue no . 3 :
20. As his services were terminated illegally, the workman sought for reinstatement . In this respect I would like to take into consideration the allegations of the first
21. In the light of ratio laid down by Hon'ble Court Apex Court , I would like to point out that the in the case at hand, though the second party workman was confirmed in the servies , he was worked less than 7 months . The first party has also lost faith in him . Therefore they have terminated his services on 21/1/2005 with immediate effect . Their relations are strained . There is no possibility of harmonious relations between them. Reinstatement would create further problems to both the parties . Furthermore the second party is not in service since 21/01/2005 and he has no touch of work and procedure since last more than 6/ 7 years . It would also be unjust to pay full backwages as the second party was technically confirmed in the services . He has not put in sufficient length of service . In this backdrop, in the light of the guidelines of Apex Court instead of reinstatement I think it proper to award compensation to the workman . While awarding compensation I take into account the pay scale of the workman which was Rs . 7000/- p.m. I also take into account the short duration of his service , his age and the services he has rendered. In the circumstances I think it proper to [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2665
The Manager
Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. award compensation to the tune of Rs . 75,000/- .Accordingly I partly allow this reference and proceed to pass the following order;
ORDER
Loni Terminal Pune412201 . AND
The reference is partly allowed as follows:
THEIR WORKMEN
(i) The order of termination of services of the second party workman is declared illegal .
The Secretary General
Petroleum Employees Union
(ii) Instead of reinstatement , the first party is directed to pay compensation to the second party to the tune of Rs . 75,000/-
Tel Rasayan Bhawan
Tilak Road , Dadar
(iii) No order as to cost.
Mumbai 400014.
Date: 06/01/2012
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER
Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी, 2012
: Mr. B.D. Birajdar , Advocate
FOR THE WORKMAN
: Mr. J.H. Sawant, Advocate.
Mumbai , dated the 9th January, 2012
AWARD
का०आ० 1088.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स हिन्दुस्तान पैट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड पुणे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलय नं 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 101/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21/2/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-30011/8/2000- आई आर (एम ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L-30012/8 /2000 - IR ( M) dated 31/05/2000 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2012
"Whether the claim of Petroleum Employees Union that the casual labours appended at Annexure-A were engaged continuously by the management of HPCL at Loni Terminal, Pune and whether the action ofthe management of HPCL in terminating their services w.e.f. 1/10/99 is legal andjustified? If not, towhat relief the workmen are entitled? " S.O. 1088. In pursuance of Section 17of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 101/ 2001 ...) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court Mumbai - 2 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s hindustan Petroleum Corporation LTD (Pune) and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 21/02/2012
[No. L-30011/ 8/2000 -IR(M) ] Johan Topno , Under Secretary
ANNEXURE
2. The above reference was restored vide order date 14/06/2007 passed in Misc/ AppIn/ CGIT- 2 / 1 of 2007 filed bythe second party union . Thereafter the matter was fixed for evidence ofthe second party. Matter was adjourned on number of occasions for settlement . On 29/11/2011 , both theparties filed consent terms/ settlement ( Ex-40 ) and prayed to dispose of the reference in terms of the settlement.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT
3. Since both the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement ( Ex- 40 ) , I think it proper to dispose of the reference . Thus the order :
K.B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer
ORDER
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/101 OF 2001
Parties
Reference is disposed of as per settlement (Ex -40 ) . No order as to cost .
Date: 09.01.2012
: Employers In Relation To The Management Of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
K.B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 2666
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award in terms of the settlement.
BEFORE THE HON'BLE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALAT MUMBAI
Mumbai
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- II / 101 OF 2002
BETWEEN
Dated: This 29th day of 2011
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD .
Sd./- Illegible
Sd./- Illegible
FIRST PARTY
Advocate for First Party
AND
For and on behalf of FirstParty Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. PETROLEUM EMPLOYEES UNION
SECOND PARTY
CONSENT TERMS
Sd./- Illegible
Sd./- Illegible
For and on behalf of May it please the Hon'ble Tribunal
Advocate for Second Party
Jaiprakash Sawant , Ad .
Second Party Petroleum Employees Union
नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2012 1. The parties to the above Reference respectifully submit that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement in respect of 26 workmen represented by the Second Party and the terms of which are annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit A.
का०आ० 1089.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के प्रबंध तंत्र , के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध 1 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या -45/ 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
2. The First Party agrees to pay out the sums of money to the workmen listed in the Annexure - A the amount shown in the last column and the said payment will be made in full and final settlement of all their dues , compensation , gratuity, rights and claims of whatsoever nature against the First Party including in satisfaction of their right to reinstatement and / or re - employment.
[सं० एल-1/2012/ 300/2003- आई०आर० ( बी-1 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 22nd February , 2012 3. The First Party states that one of the workmen namely Vijay Narasing Kalbhor shown in Sr. No. 9 of Annexure-A has expired and the sum of money of Rs 1,22,343/- due to him will be paid to his legal heir . The legal heir being a minor, it shall be paid to the guardian of the minor upon the guardian producing before the First Party legal identity.
S.O .. 1089. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 45/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, andtheir workmen , received by the Central Government on 22.02.2012 .
4. The First Party would pay out the monies payable to the workmen in full and final settlement by cross order / account payee cheques in favour of individual workmen in full and final settlement of their dues .
[No. L- 12012/300/2003 - IR(B - 1 ) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
Before Shri J.P.Chand, Presiding Officer CGIT- Cum- Labour Court , Nagpur 5. It is agreed that the on receipt of the aforesaid amount in respect of compensation as well as gratuity of each and every workman and upon payment of said dues their accounts are fully and finally settled and no benefit which is computable interms of money remains payable to anyworkman.
Date: 10.02.2012
Case No. CGIT/NGP/45 /2004
PartyNo.1
: The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal Office , Region- I , S . V. Patel Marg , Nagpur .
Versus
PartyNo.2
6.On receipt ofthe cheques and payment , the union or any or the workmen concerned in the present dispute would have no dues , rights and claims out standing against the First party Corporation and the subject matter of the above Reference is fully and finally settled. The First Party agrees to pay out the aforesaid amount as shown in the last column of the Annexure -A within one week of the signing of this settlement .
: The Zonal Secretary, State Bank Workers Organisation, 542, Opposite New English High School , Congress Nagar , Nagpur.
7. The parties to the above reference submit that the 2667
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
95,708
95,708
95,708
95,708
95,708
95,708
95,708
1,44,120
1,40,099
1,40,099
1,40,099
1,40,099
1,13,464
1,35,660
1,30,337
1,13,464
1,22,343
1,17,904
1,44,120
1,22,343
1,13,464
1,39,526
1,22,343
1,25,743
1,09,025
1,22,343
Total Rounded Off)
31,06,551
Exhibit-A
95708.15 95708.15
95708.15
95708.15 95708.15
95708.15
95708.15 122342.62
140098.92
140098.92
113464.46
139525.69
113464.46
122342.62
140098.92 135659.85
144119.85
122342,62 113464.46
144119.85
122342.62
140098.92
130337.38 117903.54
Total
109025.38
125743.23
3106551.38
25,000
25,000 25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000 25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000 25,000 25,000
25,000 25,000
25,000
25,000
Lumpsum Amount
6,50,000
54145.38452
59451.92308
61528.84615
45183.46154
59451.92308
35671.15385
59451.92308
35671.15385
35671.15385
51684.23077
49939.61538
47561.53846
61528.84615
59451.92308 49939.61538
49939.61538
35671.15385 49939.61538
45183.46154
35671.15385
57073.84615
45183.46154
42805.38462
35671.15385
35671.15385
59067.69231
Gratuity
53325
51525 51525 49464
51525
44793 41220
53325
46926
51525
51192 39159
39159
37098
30915 30915 43281
43281
43281
30915
30915
39159
30915
30915
43281
30915
Retrench- ment compen. sation
4,266.00
4,266.00
4,122.00
4,266.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00 4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,266.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00
4,122.00 4,122.00
4,122.00
4,266.00
Monthly wages basis18 days worked
5954.00 5954.00
5954.00
6162.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00 6162.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00 5954.00 5954.00
6162.00
6162.00 5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
5954.00
6162.00
5954.00
Average monthly wages
237
229
229 229 229 229 229 229
237
229
229 229 229 229
229
237 237 229
237
229 229 229
229
229 229
229
Daily wages
22
25 25 25
25
25
24
18
25
15
21
19 19
15 15 15
24 19
15
21
21 21
21
20
15
15
No.of years
1992
31/10/86
Jul-90
Jun-86
Jul-86
Oct-96
Apr-86
Oct-90
Oct-90
Working since
Oct-91
Oct-96
Jul-92
Oct-96
Apr-86
Aug-86
Aug-87
Aug-92
May-87
May-90
May-88
May-90
May-93
May-96
May-96
May-96
May-96
VijayNarsingKalbhor
4SharadSakharamAkate
1DeelipAmbrushiBorskar
5HanumanYadavPawar
7MarutiMasajiLokhande
6MahindraS.Kalbhor
3ShivajiGenbaPandit
8UttamGopalraoKhangare
2VijayGopalraoTaware
12BalkrishnaRGajkwad
10ShivajiHanumantRoli
17SultanMehbubPasha
16RajendraBabanAtole
S.Name No.
15NavnathSShitkal
18ArvindNJadhav
11DattatraySKalbhor
19KiranDattatrayKalbhor
14SuryakantRLandge
13SudamKrishnajiKalbhor
24GurudasGLandge
26ShivajiKisanShinde
25VinayakAKalbhor
21MahadeoShankdarDombale
22HaridasNamdeoSatpute
20SandeepMahadeoGaikwad
23RajendraPratapKalbhor
686 GI/ 2012-24 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2668
AWARD
(Dated: 10th February, 2012)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) ofsection 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (" theAct " in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman Mrs. , S.A. Bhole, for adjudication, as per letter No.L- 12012/300/2003 - IR (B- I) dated 08.04.2004, with the following schedule:-
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its Assistant General Manager, Zonal Office, Region - I , Nagpur in reduction of pay scale and treating the suspension period as 'not on duty' ofthe workmanMrs. S.A. Bhole is justified and legal ? Ifnot, to what relief the said workman is entitled ? "
2.Onreceipt ofthe reference , the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the union, " State Bank Workers Organisation, " filed the statement of claim on behalf ofthe workman , Mrs. S.A. Bhole , (" the workman " in short) and the management of the State Bank of India ("Party No.1 " in short ) filed its written statement .
3. The case of the workman is that she was working in Ramdaspeth Branch of State Bank of India and the said branch had opened an extension counter in the premises ofNEERI , which was 2 to 3 kms . away from the branch and itwas the regular practice in the branch to accept the cash fromthe DeputyHead Cashier for NEERI Extension Counter in the early hour and to keep the same in a Tin Box and keeping that box near the strong room, the Cashier was to perform the duty of writing inward dak and accordingly, she had accepted cash Rs.2,65,100/-as usual on 7.3.93 at about 10.45 AM and kept the locked box near the strong, room and started working outside the cash department, as per the order of her superior and at about 11.25 AM, the cash box was taken to NEERI Extension Counter in a taxi and when she opened the cash box at NEERI Extension counter , she found shortage of Rupees one lakh , so she immediately brought the said facts to the notice of the concerned officers and also informed the same to be a case oftheft and the Party No. 1 lodged complaint with the Police Authority and the Police conducted investigation. The further case of the workinan is that she was put under suspension w.e.f. 23.11.93 as per the orders dated 29.10.93 and such suspension continued till 15.12.2001 and the suspension was unwarranted, as the case was one of theft and she opposed the suspension order by filing her representation on 17.12.93 and the Party No.1 turned down the request and continued the suspension and the Police Authority registered criminal case bearing No.222 of 94 against her is the Court of JMFC , Nagpur (Court No.2) and the criminal case came to be finally adjudicated and vide judgmentdt . 7.8.98 , she was acquitted and no appeal was filed against the said judgment and during the pendency ofthe criminal case , on 12.2.97 , the Party No.1 issued a charge sheet containing seven charges against her , violating the provision of Para 521 (3 ) of Shastry Award and after submission of the reply by her, the Party No.1 decided to conduct the enquiry and appointed Inquiry Officer and on completion of enquiry, the Inquiry Officer submitted his report to the Disciplinary Authority and the Disciplinary Authority issued show cause notice to her and she filed her show cause on 2.6.2000 and three types ofpunishment were imposed against her and she filed an appeal against the said order and the Appellate Authority vide has order dated 14.11.2002 disposed ofthe appeal by modifying the punishment and set aside the punishment ofrecovery of Rupees one lakh from her, but maintained the other two types of punishment i. e . reduction of her pay scale by two stages with cumulative effect and to treat the period of suspension as such , so , she raised the dispute through her union before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Nagpur on 24.3.2003 and as the conciliation failed, the ALC reported the failure of the conciliation to the Government .
The further case of the workman is that the charges framed against her were the technical nature and the procedural lapses were given the colour of misconduct and the instruction given by superiors could not be brought on record of the enquiry, because there was unwarranted interference by the Inquiry Officer and the Inquiry Officer did not allow to put vital questions to the sole witness for the management and the enquiry was conducted in violation of the rules and the management failed to prove the charges leveled against her and the entire enquiry was conducted by the Inquiry Officer with bias and he acted contrary to the principles of the natural justice and the enquiry is defective on denial of the fair opportunity and the evidence relied on by the learned JMFC , Nagpur and Inquiry Officer in the enquiry proceeding was almost the same as such , there is no sufficient evidence to punish her and the findings of the Inquiry Officer are perverse and the punishment awarded isshocking disproportionate .
4. In its written statment, the Party No.1 had raised prelirninary objection regarding the maintainability of the reference , on the ground that the dispute in question is not an industrial dispute and individual dispute has been given the colour of industrial dispute . It is further pleaded by the PartyNo. 1 that the workman was working as Cashier at NEERI Extension Counter of the Bank, which is attached with the Ramdaspeth branch and on7.9.93 , the workman attended Ramdaspeth branch at about 10.20 AM and Shri V.C. Pophali was officiating as Cash Officer and Shri A.P.Hardas was working as Deputy Head Cashier and the workman received the cash Rs.2,65,100/- from the Deputy Head Cashier under he acted fedgement at about 10.45 AM and thereafter, it [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2669 भारत का पत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
personal hearing on 7.7.2000 and by order dated 6.12.2001 , the Disciplinary Authority passed the order of reduction in her scale of pay by two stages with cumulative effect , recovery of Rs. one lakh from her salary in 40 equal monthly installments @Rs.2,500/- and treat the period ofsuspension as such and the workman preferred an appeal on 25.1.2001 to the Appellate Authority and the Appellate Authority, after taking into consideration the facts of the case and applying his mind independently and after giving personal hearing to the workman on 23.2.2002 , maintained the punishment awarded by the Disciplinary Authority, but by taking a lenient view, set aside the recovery of the money and though the Party No. I had proposed the imposition of the punishment from " dismissal without notice " , taking lenient view passed the punishment as mentioned above and the bank has not committed any illegality while passing the order and the punishment is commensurate with the misconduct proved against the workman and as such, there is no necessity to interfere with the same and the enquiry was conducted by following the principles of natural justice and there was no question of any bias against the workman by the Inquiry Officer and every opportunity was given to the workman in the departmental enquiry to defend her and copies of the relevant documents were given to the workman and irrelevant questions were only disallowed by the Inquiry Officer during cross -examination of the witness for the bank and false allegations have been made by the workman and as such , the workman is not entitled forany relief.
5. Even though , this is not a case of dismissal , termination or retrenchment of the workman from services , still then, the validity of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue for consideration and vide order dated 07.02.2011 the departmental enquiry was held to be legal and proper and by following the principles of natural justice.
was lyingunattended in cash department for a period of45 minutes and thereafter, the workman carried the said cash in the cash box to NEERI Extension counter about 11.15 AM and when she opened the cash box at NEERI Extension Counter, it was found by her that a sum of Rs . 1,00,000/- was missing from the cash delivered to her by the Deputy Head Cashier and the matter was reported to Police , who registered F.I.R. against the workman and she was prosecuted by the Police and was charged for committing criminal breach of trust in respect of Rs . One Lakh , under section 409 of IPC and as the workman did not follow the instructions of the bank and was negligent and committed several procedural lapses in discharge of her duties as cashier, the bank investigated into the matter and then issued a charges sheet dt . 12.2.97 against her and prior to issuance of the charge sheet, the workman was placed under suspension by order dt. 29.10.93 and the charge sheet contained seven counts of charges and the charges No 1 to 6 are gross misconduct in term ofpara 521 (4)(e) (j ) of Shastri Award , which read as , "doing any act pre -judicial το the interest ofthe bank or gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss " and the charge No.7 amounts to gross misconduct in term of para52.1 (4 e)( i) of Shastri Award, which reads as , "willful in subordination or disobedience of any lawful and reasonable order of the management or of a superior " and " doing any act prejudicial to the interest of the bank or gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss " and the Party No.1 appointed Inquiry Officer and the enquiry started on 5.12.97 and the Presenting Officer filed six documents and the list of witnesses on 5.1.98 , the copies of which were handed over to the defence representative and the Party No.1 examined one witness to prove the charges and he was cross - exantined by the defence representative and the workman examined four withnesses including herself and they were cross - examined by the presenting officer of the bank and defence representative denianded certain documents during the enquiry and relevant documents were supplied to the defence representative and Inquiry Officer gave his report dated 14.1.99 to the Disciplinary Authority holding the charges No.1,2,3 , and 7 to be duly proved and the charges No. 4,5 and 6 not to have been proved and the inquiry Officer gave detailed and cogent reasons in support of his findings and basing on the report of the inquiry Officer , show cause notice dated 24.3.2000 was issued to the workman to show cause against the proposed punis'ament along with enquiry report and while proposing the punishment, the Disciplinary Authority agreed with the findings of the Inquiry Officer in respect of the proof of the charges No.1,2,3 and 7 but did not agree with the findings in respect of charges No.4,5 and 6 and after giving detailed reasons and observations , the Disciplinary Authority held the charge No.4,5 and 6 to have also been proved against the workman and the workman gave her reply on 2.6.2000 and the workman was also given
6. During the course of argument, it was submitted by the learned advocate for the workman that three punishments were inflicted against the workman , such as , reduction in scale of pay by two stages with cumulative effect, treating the period of suspension as " not on duty " and recovery of the amount of Rs . 1,00,000/- and the workman had denied that she had committed any negligence in duty and police case no . 222/04 had been registered against her for the loss of Rs . 1,00,000/- and during the pendency of the criminal case , charge sheet wassubmitted.against the workman by party no.1 and the workmanwas acquitted in the criminal case on 07.08.1998 and the acquittal was clean and free from any stigma and as the criminal trial and departmental enquiry were conducted on similar set of facts and circumstances and as theworkman was acquitted in the criminal case, the findings of the departmental enquiry ought to have been similar and she should have been exonerated from the charges in the departmental enquiry and the findings of the enquiry [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2670
officer are perverse , as the same are without any supporting wasalso imitiated by the Hon'ble Appex Court .
evidence on record and material witness , such as the In a number of decisions , the Hon'ble Apex Court
investigating officer of the criminal case was not examined have held that:-
in the departmental enquiry and the charge sheet itself is
defective and party no.1 miserably failed to establish the "Thejurisdiction of the Tribunal to interfere with the
charges leveled against the workman and the party no.1 is disciplinary matters or punishment cannot be equated
responsible for the delay in disposal of the departmental with an appellate jurisdiction. The Tribunal cannot
proceeding and appeal preferred by the workman and such interfere with the findings of the Inquiry officer or
delay caused prejudice to the workman and the punishment , competent authority where they are not arbitrary or
suspension period be treated as such is harsh and utterly perverse . The power to impose penalty on a
disproportionate and in view of the perversity of the delinquent officer is conferred on the competent
impugned order, the punishment inflicted against the authority either by an Act of legislature or rules made
workman is unreasonable and disproportionate to the cause . under the proviso to Act . 309 of the Constitution. If
there has been an enquiry consistent with the rules
7. Per contra, it was submitted by the learned advocate and in accordance with principles of natural justice
forthe party no.1 that the enquiry officer dealt with each of what punishment would meet the ends ofjustice is a
the charge distinctly, separately and individually in his matter exclusively within the jurisdiction of the
report and held that charges no . 1,2,3 and 7 were duly competent authority . If the penalty can lawfully be
proved and the enquiry officer gave detailed and cogent imposed and is imposed on the proved misconduct,
reasons in support of his such findings and the disciplinary the Tribunal has no power to substitute its own
authority after considering the report and other materials discretion for that of the authority. The adequacy of
onrecord, disagreed with the findings ofthe enquiry officer penalty unless it is malafide is certainly not a matter
in respect of charges no . 4, 5 and 6 and held that the said ofthe Tribunal to concern itself with . The Tribunal
charges were also proved against the workman alongwith also cannot interfere with the penalty ifthe conclusion
charges no . 1,2,3 and 7 the disciplinary authority gave ofthe Inquiry officer or the competent authority is
detailed reasons and observations in support of his such based on evidence even if some of it is found to be
findings and the disciplinary authority issue show cause irrelevant or extraneous to the matter. "
notice to the workman in regard to the proposed punishment
of "dismissal without notice " for each charges separately "As far as acquittal of the appellant by a criminal
and it was also proposed to show cause as to why the court is concerned , in our opinion , the said order
suspension period should not be treated as " not on duty " does not preclude the corporation from taking an
under para 521 ( 10)(b ) of Sastry Award and the workman action if it is otherwise permissible . In our judgment
filed her show cause and she was also given personal the law is fairly well settled . Acquittal by a criminal
hearing and taking into consideration the facts and court would not debar an employer from exercising
circumstances of the case, the disciplinary authority took power in accordance with Rules and Regulations in
a lenient view and instead of imposing the punishment of force. The two proceedings criminal and departmental
dismissal , imposed the penalty as already mentioned above are entirely different . They operate in different fields
and in the appeal preferred by the workman , the appellate and have different objectives . Whereas , the object
authority modified the punishment by taking a lenient view ofcriminal trial is to inflict appropriate punishment
and set aside the recovery of the money from the month of on the offender, the purpose of enquiry proceedings
the appellate order dated 14.11.2002 and the punishment is isto deal with the delinquent departmentally and to
commensurate with the misconduct proved against the impose penalty in accordance with service Rules . In
workman and there is no scope to interfere with the same . a criminal trial , incriminating statement made by the
accused in certain circumstances or before certain
Insupport of such contentions , reliance was placed officers is totally inadmissible in evidence . Such strict
by the learned advocate for party no.1 in the decisions rules of evidence and procedure would not apply to
reported in AIR 2003 SC - 1571 ( Chairman and Managing departmental proceedings . The degree of proof,
Director, United Commercial Bank Vs. P.C. Kakkar ) andAIR which is necessary to order a conviction , is different
2003 SC- 1462 (Regional Manager, UPSRTC Itawa Vs. from the degree of proof necessary to record the
Hottilal). commission of delinquency. The rule relating to
9.Before delving into the merit ofthe matter, I think it appreciation of evidence in the two proceedings is
proper to mention the settled principle regarding the power also not similar . In criminal law, burden ofproof is on
of a Tribunal in interfering with punishment awarded by the prosecution and unless the prosecution is able
the competent authority in departmental proceedings and to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable
regarding the effect of acquittal of an employee by a doubt he cannot be convicted by the court of law. In
criminal court , against whom a departmental proceedings departmental enquiry on the other hand penalty can
2671 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
be imposed on the delinquent officer on a finding recorded, on the basis of ' preponderance of probability' . Acquittal of the appellant by a judicial Magistrate , therefore , does not ipso facto absolve him from the liability under the disciplinary jurisdiction of the corporation . We are therefore , unable to uphold the contention of the appellant that since he was acquitted by a criminal court, the impugned order dismissing him from service deserves to be quashed and set aside . "
Hon'able Apex Court as mentioned above . On perusal of the materials on record , it is found that the enquiry officer has based his findings on the materials on record of the departmental proceeding . He has assigned cogent reasons in support of such findings . This is not a case of no evidence . Hence , it cannot be said that the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse. It is necessary to mention here that the enquiry officer even held that the charges no. 4, 5 and6 were not proved against the workman. It was the disciplinary authority, who by a reasoned order held the workman to be guilty of charges no . 4, 5 and 6 besides charges no . 1 , 2 , 3 and 7. It is also found that even though notice to show cause was issued to the workman as to why the punishment of dismissal without notice should not be inflicted and the period of suspension should not be treated as " not on duty " , the Disciplinary Authority taking a lenient view, imposed the punishment of lowering the scale of the workman by two stages with cumulative effect and the Appellate authority also modified the punishment and set aside the order of recovery of the amount of one lakh . Serious misconduct has been proved against the workman ina validly held departmental enquiry.
Onperusal ofthe record , it is found that the evidence in the departmental enquiry and in the criminal proceeding were not the same and as such , the contention that due to acquittal of the workman in the criminal case , the Party No. 1 should not have proceeded with the departmental enquiry or that the findings of the departmental enquiry should be like that of the criminal case has no force . Hence , there is noground to interfere with the punishment imposed against the workman . Hence it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management ofState Bank of India through its Assistant General Manager, Zonal Office , Region - I , Nagpur in reduction of pay scale and treating the suspension period as ' not on duty ' of the workman Mrs. S.A. Bhole is justified and legal. The workman is not entitled to any relief .
J.P. CHAND , Presiding Officer.
नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी, 2012
का०आ० 1090.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सुपरिटेन्डेंट, आरकोलोजिस्ट बंगलौर एण्ड अद्रर्स प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या-सी० आर०न०-175/1990 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-02-2012 प्राप्त हुआ था ।
" The purpose of departmental enquiry and of prosecution is two different and distinct aspects . The criminal prosecution is launched for an offence for violation of a duty, the offender owes to the society of for breach of which law has provided that the offender shall make satisfaction to the public . So crime is an act of commission in violation of law or of omission of public duty. The departmental enquiry is to maintaindiscipline in the service and efficiency ofpublic service . It would, therefore , be expedient thatthe disciplinary proceedings are conducted and completed as expeditiously as possible . It is not, therefore, desirable to lay down any guidelines as inflexible rules in which the departmental proceedings rnay or may not be stayed pending trial in criminal case against the delinquent officer. Each case requires to be considered in the back drop of its own facts and circumstances . There would be no bar to proceed simultaneously with departmental enquiry and trial of a criminal trial is to grave nature involving complicated questions of fact and law. Offence generally implies infringement of public duty, as distinguished from mere private rights punishable under criminal law. When trial for criminal offence is conducted it should be in accordance with proof of the offence as per the evidence defined under the provision of the Evidence Act . Converse is the case of departmentai enquiry. The enquiry in delinquent officertopunish him for his misconduct defined under the relevant statutory rules of law. That the strict standard of proof of applicability of the Evidence Actstands excluded is a settled legal position. Under these circumstances , what is required to be seen is whether the departmental enquiry would seriously prejudice the delinquent in his defence at the trial in a criminal case . It is always a question of fact to be considered in each case depending on its own facts and circumstances . In this case , the charge is failure to anticipate the accident and prevention threof. It has nothing to do with the culpability of the offence under Section 304-A and 338 IPC . Under these circumstances , the High Court was not right in staying the proceedings . "
[सं० एल-42012/54/1990- आई आर ( डी ०यू० ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी
9.Now, the present case at hand is to be considered with the touch stone of the principles enunciated by the [PART 11-SEC . 3(11)] 2672
New Delhi the 22nd February, 2012
S.O. 1090.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. C.R.No.175 / 1990) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Superintendent , Archeologist , Bangalore and Others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 22.02.2012 .
holding that the termination is not given in the eye of law and the same was set aside and while denying the back wages , continuity of service and other benefits were granted . Aggrieved by this award the second party had preferred writ petition No. 41446/2001 (L - Res ) and the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka considering the said writ petition along with Writ Petition No. 41447/2001 which involved similar facts set aside the award and remitted back the matter for fresh disposal in accordance with law after providing an opportunity to both the parties .
[No. L -42012/ 54/ 1990- IK(CDU) RAMESH SINGH, Desk Cificer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE
Dated: 12th January, 2012
FRESENT:
Shri S.N. Navalgund, Presiding Officer
C.R. No. 75/1990
II PARTY
I PARTY
The Superientendent ,
Shri K. Siddappa ,
3.After remand Shri DRV Bhat who had appeared for him earlier submits that he would continue whereas the second party entered its appearance through Shri Deshraj , Advocate and Shri DRV Bhat , Advocate availed several adjournments submitting that he would file rejoinder to the additional counter statement filed by the second party but later making submission that he has no information from the first party, did not participate in the proceedings . The first party ultimately forwarded a letter dated 22.12.2011 received in this tribunal by post on 26.12.2011 requesting to dismiss the case . Today when this letter was brought to the notice ofthe learned counsel appearing for the second party he submits that he has no objection to the same . In view ofthis development the proceedings of this reference came to be closed today.
Archeoligist, ASI BangaloreCircle, 4thTBlock, Jayanagar , Bangalore 560041.
C/ o. A Venkatesha, Behind Church, 7th Ward, Hampi National Project, Kamalapura- 583 221
TheDy. Supdt.
4. Since the workman who raised this dispute having submitted a letter to permit him to withdraw the case and to dismiss, the reference regarding termination of his service does not survive and the reference has to be rejected as the dispute is withdrawn.
Archeologist,
5. In the result, I pass the following award.
Hampi National Project, Kamalapura- 583-221
AWARD
AWARD
The reference is rejected on the ground that the first party workman withdraw the dispute.
(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 12.01.2012 )
S.N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer.
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) has referred this dispute vide order No. L-42012 /54/ 90 - IR (DU) dated 23.11.1990 for adjudication on the following Schedule:
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012 SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Archelogical Survey of India, Bangalore in terminating the services of Shri K. Siddappa, Ex - Site Supervisor without any reasons and without complying the provisions of the ID Act , 1947 is justified ? If not , to what reliefthe workman is entitled to? "
का०आ० 1091.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कर्नाटका बैंक लि प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/1990 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-12012/5/82- आई आर ( बी -1 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी 2.After completion of the pleadings and receiving the evidence adduced by both the sides this tribunal by award dated 30th May 2001 had allowed the reference 2673 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
New Delhi the 23rd February, 2012
S.O. 1091.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/990) ofthe Central Tribunal -cum- Labour Court-Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Karnataka Bank Limited and their workman , received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012
[No. L- 12012/5/82 - IR(B-I) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT BANGALORE
Dated: 16th January, 2012
PRESENT:
Shri S.N. Navalgund , Presiding Officer
C.R. No. 16/1990
I PARTY
II PARTY
The General Secretary, Karnataka Bank Staff
TheGeneral Manager , Karnataka Bank - Limited,
Association, 8. Ganesh Krupa , New Balmata Road , MANGALORE -575001
HeadOffice , Kodailbail, MANGALORE -575003
AWARD
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub section 2.A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) has refferred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/ 5/ 82-D - 1 - IV) (A )/IR( B- 1 ) dated nil ( received on 26.03.1990) for adjudication on the following Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Karnataka Bank Ltd , Mangalore in dismissing Shri M. Ashok Kumar, Attender from service vide Bank's Order No. PIR.964 / 81 dated 11.07.1981 was legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled?"
2.After receipt of the reference this tribunal securing the presence of both the sides after receiving their claim statement and counter statement while framing a Preliminary Issue as to " Whether the Second party proves that the DE held against the first party was in accordance with law and principles of natural justice ? " after receiving the evidence for the second party adduced through Presenting Officer in Domestic Enquiry and marking charge sheet dated
12.06.1979; second charge sheet dated 14.12.1979 ; reply to the first charge sheet given by the first party; reply to the second charge sheet given by the first party; order sheet maintained by the enquiry officer ; report of the enquiry officer giving findings dated 1.05.1981 ; written representation submitted by the first party to second show cause notice; order passed by the Disciplinary Authority dismissing the first party dated 11.07.1981 ; appeal memo preferred by the first party before the chairman ; personal hearing given by the chairman ; order of the Chairman dismissing the appeal and the enclosure to the order of the chairman as Ex. M1 to M12 respectively and of first party marking the Photostat copies of memo served on the first party by the second party dated 30.03.1979; reply dated 26thApril 1979 of the first party on the memo issued to him; charge sheet dated 12th June 1979 ; Reply of first party to the charge sheet; second charge sheet issued by the second partydated 14th December 1979; reply to the charge sheet dated 14.12.1979 of the first party; notice of enquiry dated 30.08.1980 ; second show cause notice dated 15.05.1981; reply given by the first party to the notice of enquiry; dismissal order of first party dated 11.07.1981 ; written appeal of the first party to the dismissal order dated 11.07.1981 ; Order dismissing the appeal of the first party dated 15.09.1981; proceedings of the Appellate Authority inthe matter ofappeal preferred by the first party; certificate issued by the Joint Secretary dated 20.06.89 certifying the first party was the office bearer of the K.B. Staff Association; the first party's membership form of KB Staff Association ; xerox copy of the resolution passed by KBSA ; certified copy ofthe WP No. 10173/1980 filed by the second party letter written by the branch manager addressed to the General Manager, head Office regarding taking some action against the attitude of the first party; representation letter addressedto the General Manager by KBSA dated 30.07.1979; representation letter addressed to the Manager by Shri P. Ravindra Rao regarding the attitude of the first party dated 3.10.1979 ; reply letter dated 12.1.1980 addressed to the Chairman by the first party on the charge sheet issued to him; letter dated 25.06.1981 issued by the manager to the first party regarding payment subsistence allowance payable to him for the month of June 1981 ; letter dated 30.7.1981 issued by the manager to the first party regarding payment of subsistence allowance payable to him for the month of March 1981 ; letter dated 29.04.1981 issued by the manager to the first party regarding payment of subsistence allowance payable to him amounting Rs . 155.78 as Ex . WI to W23 for the first party and hearing arguments of learned advocates of both , by order dated 5.01.1999 answered the Preliminary issue in the' Affirmative ' i. e. Domestic Enquiry conducted being fair and proper. After answering the preliminary issue touching the fairness of the Domestic Enquiry, this tribunal after hearing the arguments of the learned advocate appearing for both sides on merits , by award dated 3.05.1999 , solely on the ground that the management/ second party failed to obtain the approval of
2674 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933 [PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)]
the tribunal by paying one month salary in accordance Hon'ble High Court the finding of this tribunal as well as
withSection 33 (2)(b) ofthe Act in view ofdispute pertaining the learned Single Judge that no prior approval has been
to this very workman decided in CR No. 6/1978 dated obtained by the Management as contemplated under sub
22.3.1980 and pending in WP No. 10175/1980 in the file of section (2) of section 33 of the Act holds no water and
the Hon'ble High Court preferred by the management directed to consider the case of the workman on merits ,
imposing the impugned punishment is illegal set aside the now this tribunal is expected to consider ' whether the
impugned order ofdismissal dated 11.07.1981 directing the finding of the enquiry officer on the impugned charges is
second party to reinstate the first party with continuity of perverse? If not whether the punishment imposed by the
service and back wages at 25% . Aggrieved by this award Disciplinary Authority and upheld by the Appellate
in WP No. 18414/99 the second party challenged the award Authority is disproportionate to the charges proved ?.
setting aside the punishment of dismissal and consequential 3. Inview of the facts narrated by me above , though
order, whereas , the first party preferred Writ Petition No. a lengthy argument was addressed by the learned advocate
29881/99 challenging the portion of the award rejecting appearing for the first party touching the propriety and
75% of the back wages . The Hon'ble High Court of fairness of the Domestic Enquiry, I do not dwell upon the
Karnataka considering both the writ petitions by common fairness and the propriety of the Domestic Enquiry and to
order dated 01.03.2005 while observing in para 5 of the proceed to consider merits of the matter.
order' this tribunal has noticed a judgement of the Supreme
Court reported in 1998 II CLR 918 rules the dismissal is a 4.It isborne out from the records of the enquiry that
nullity but recently the Supreme Court in 2002( 1 ) LRI 443 the first party was served with two charge sheets dated
has considered a similar issue which was unfortunately 12.06.1979 and 14.12.1979 . The first one by the General
not available to the tribunal when the award was passed, Manager and the second one by the Chairman of the
the award needs a re - look' allowed both the writ petitions Second Party bank which have been marked as Ex . M10 &
and set aside the award and remitted back the matter to this M55 respectively in the Domestic Enquiry. In the 1st Charge
tribunal with a direction to consider primarily with regard Sheet issued by the General Manager dated 12.6.1979 the
to violation of Section 33 (2 ) (b) as alleged by the workman first party was charged (i ) that he was unpunctual in
and if the finding is in favour ofthe workman not to go to attendance and used to go out of office during office hours
the merits of the matter if it is of the opinion that the matter without any good cause at his own sweet will and pleasure
requires reconsideration to consider the question of and that on 22.3.1979 he reported for duty at about 10.05
domestic enquiry issued and thereafter decide the matter. AM instead of 9.45 AM and later left the office premises
The managernent assailing this judgement initially filed Writ for about half an hour each at 11.30AM and 12.30 Noon,
appeal before the division bench ofthe Hon'ble High Court 1.10PM unauthorisedly without any good cause and on
ofKarnataka in No. 2623/2005 and on 5th May 2005 by 24.03.1979 came to office at 10.10 AM and left office premises
filing a memo sought permission to withdraw the same unauthorisedly and without good cause for about 10
with libertyto file a review petition before the learned single minutes at about 10.25 AM and 48 minutes from 11.30 AM
judge andthe Hon'ble Division Bench accorded permission to 12.18 Noon ( ii ) that he refused to sign the acquittance
to withdraw the Writ Appeal with liberty to file a review register for January 1979 though the annual increment was
petition . Then a review petition was filed by the second also disbursed on 5th January 1979 and he also refused to
party in Review Petition No. 389/2005 before the hon'ble sign the register for having received the salary for February
single judge and that also since came to be rejected by 1979 when he was called upon to sign the register and (iii )
orderdated 18.07.2005 , again the second party/ management that he who refused to sign the acquittance roll for January
filed a fresh writ appeal before the Division Bench ofthe and February 1979 subsequently signed the same ante
Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Writ Appeal No. 3122/ dating and that the charge complained in para (i) constitutes
05(L - TER) and in that appeal the Hon'ble High Court by misconduct within the meaning of Para 19.7 (b) & (c) ofthe
order dated 21.07.2009 set aside the order passed by the Bipartite Settlement , the conduct covered in para (ii )
Hon'ble Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos . 18414/99 & 29881 / constitutes insubordination of lawful and reasonable order
99 as well as order passed in Review Petition No. 389/05 of the superiors within the meaning of Para 19.5 (e) of the
and remitted back to this tribunal with direction to consider bipartite settlement and the ( iii ) tampering with the records
the merits of the matter. In WP No. 29881/99 filed by the of the bank amounts to misconduct as per para 19.5 (b) of
first party though order of this tribunal on DE was not the bipartite settlement . In the second charge sheet he is
challenged , the Hon'ble Single Judge was pleased to set charged ( i) that on 14.07.1979 at about 1.55 pm he threw the
aside that order but in Writ Appeal 3122/05 ( L - TER) the cash box into cupboard in the store room creating big sound
Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court having set aside and left without closing the store room gate (ii) that he
the said order in its entirety while holding that when the refused to receive the memo issued inrespect of his above
two charge sheets in question were served no proceeding conduct under PIR 7809 of 79 tendered through post (iii )
was pending before the tribunal and the finding of the that when the said memo was tendered by the branch
tribunal assailed in Writ Petition was pending before the manager in person on 3.11.1979 he refused to receive ( iv)
2675
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
that on 3.10.1979 at about 4.45pm when the branch official Shri P Ravindraraidu asked him to carry the OBC register to the signature of the , manager refused to carry and (v) that on the same day i.e. 3.10.1997 at about 5.30 pm he threw the bank registers into the cupboard instead of keeping them in the cupboard carefully and thereby he committed gross misconduct as per para 19.5 ( d) of the bipartite settlement .
5. The enquiry officer after securing the presence of CSF duly observing the formalities of preliminary hearing and recording the evidence of three witnesses for the Management and exhibiting Ex . M1 to M57 (a) the detailed description of which are narrated in the annexure to the award and only authorization in favour of Shri A. Achuta Nalluraya given by the first party to represent him in the DE as Ex . El , after hearing the arguments of the Presenting Officer and the DR by his report dated 1.05.1981 held Charge No. 1 under first charge sheet and all the five charges in the second charge sheet being proved .
6. The Disciplinary Authority/General Manager on receipt of the enquiry finding from the enquiry officer by his letter dated 15.05.1981 (Ex. M6 ) while enclosing the copy ofthe enquiry report observing that having regard to the proved charges there is no justification of retaining him in service , proposing the punishment of dismissal calledupon the first party to make his written submission within 7 days of the receipt of the notice and also directed him to appear in his chamber on 30th May 1981 at about 4 pm for personal hearing and accordingly on written submission submitted by the first party dated 18.06.1981 giving him a personal hearing on the same day i.e. 18.06.1981 , being not satisfied with his written submission accepting the finding of the enquiry officer issued the impugned dismissal order dated 11.07.1981 (Ex . M) . The first party then preferred an appeal to the Chairman ofthe Second Party/Appellate Authority dated 13.08.1981 (Ex. M9) and the said Appellate Authority after giving him a personal hearing on 11.09.1981 (Ex . M10) rejected the appeal by his order bearing No. PIR/ 12565/81 dated 15.9.1981 (Ex . M11 ) . Aggrieved by the said order of dismissal and confirmed by the Appellate Authority, the first party initiated the conciliation proceedings before the ALC ( Central ) Mangalore and on its failure when Central Govt . refused to refer the matter for adjudication he approached the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition No. 3384/1983 and in that writ petition since the Hon'ble High Court directed the Central Government to refer the matter to appropriate Industrial Tribunal for adjudication , the Central Government made this reference for adjudication.
7. Asobserved by me above, in view of the decision ofHon'ble Division Bench of the Hogh Court of Karnataka in Writ Appeal No. 3122/05 , now the question remaining for consideration of this tribunal being .
Whether the finding of the enquiry officer on the
686 GI/2012-25
impugned charges is perverse ?
If not , whether the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority and upheld by the Appellate Authority is disproportionate to the charges leveled against him?
one . Let me proceed to consider these aspects one by
8. In the claim statement filed for the first party touching the merits of the findings it is stated the enquiry officer had pre-judged the issues and imported certain observations in his findings which are not on record and that he concluded his reasonings on the basis of certain suggestions made by the defence Representative while cross examining the management witnesses as such his findings are erroneous and perverse . During the course of argument the learned advocate appearing for the first party as far as merits of the findings of the enquiry officer are concerned urged that as far as allegation of throwing cash box in the cupboard a Doctor customer said to be present being not examined and only the bank officials have deposed to this allegation non examination of independent witness is fatal therefore , the findings of the enquiry officer against the CSE /first party on this charge is perverse cited the decision reported in 2000( 2) LLN 69 in support of the said argument . He also generally urged that enquiry officer having simply brushed aside all lacunas pointed out fromt the evidence of management witnesses as minor and thereby his enquiry finding being one sided, without highlighting how he erred in rejecting to accept such arguments put forward for the first party. I have gone through the enquiry finding which is at Ex. M6 and find the enquiry officer having elaborately considered each and every arguments put forward by the Defence Representative and by giving cogent reasons either accepted the charge orrefused the relevant charge . The very fact enquiry officer rejecting Charge Nos . 2 & 3 of first charge sheet dated 12.06.76 do suggest that he has applied his mind while arriving at the conclusion of each charges leveled against the first party. The learned advocate appearing for the first partywho argued as far as the allegation of throwing cash box in the cupboard a Doctor customer said to be present not examined , failed to point out from the evidence where the said cicumstance is elicited in the cross examination of management witnesses . I too on going through the evidence of the management witnesses do not come across such material being elicited in the cross examination of any of the witness . Even assuming for the moment such a fact a Doctor customer being present is elicited in the cross examination of the management witness , mere non examination ofsuch witness in the DE is not fatal when the other evidence of the officials of the bank cannot be brushed aside without there being any reason/ motive for them to falsely implicate the employee i. e. the first party. The motive imputed to the branch manager / MW1 for falsely implicating [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2676
the first party on the ground that he was the member of one union and the first party was the member of the other union is rightly rejected by the enquiry officer because such fact is being like a double edged sword which can cut either side. The first party because was an active member in the union other than the union of which the branch Manager / MWI was the member , the first party employee who was in the lowest rung ofthe bank cannot behave in such a fashion imputed against him making the branch Manager impossible to carry the day today affairs of the bank. In this connection it is alleged in the claim statement that the enquiry officer has made unnecessary observation in last para of his finding as " the Branch Manager had to face a problematic employee in Shri M. Ashok Kumar and that the manager had no other go but to take recourse to the action resorted to by him. " in my view the enquiry officer was forced to make this observation as it was argued before him that the Branch Manager made much of silly things in initiating the Domestic Enquiry as answer to that arguments . Only because the enquiry officer did not agree with the arguments of the Defence Representative that it , is not sufficient to conclude that his finding is one sided or perverse unless it isdemonstrated how he erred in doing so . In other words if untenable arguments are put forward before an adjudicator he would naturally disagree or reject such arguinents as such because he rejected or disagreed with such arguments itcannot be said that he is one sided . The learned advocate appearing for the first party since failed to point out or demonstrate how the finding of the enquiry officer holding theCSE/first party guilty of the charge no . 1 of the first charge sheet and all the charges of the second charge sheet are erroneous or perverse I do not find any reason to come to a conclusion that the finding ofthe enquiry officer being perverse on the charges held to be proved against him.
9. Since the first party who was in the lowest rung employee ofthe bank establishment when behaved in such a fashion covered of misconduct under second charge sheet like throwing the cash box and ledgers in the cupboard and disobeying the staff of the bank as observed by the enquiry cfficer in the last para of his finding ' the branch manager had to face a problematic employee and he had no other go but to take recourse to the action resorted to by him . If an employee in the lowest rung of a banking establishment like the first party were to behave in such a fashion , as observed by the Disciplinary Authority there was no necessity for the management to continue him in the services and his decision to dismiss him from service is just and proper. Under the circumstances I find no reason tohold the finding of the enquiry officer being perverse or the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority upheld by the Appellate Authority being disproportionate to the charges proved against him . In other words I have po reason to interfere in the findings of the enquiry officer Polding une first party guilty of the charge No. 1 in charge ace: No. 1 and of all the five charges of second Charge Sheet as well as the Disciplinary Authority imposing the extreme punishment of dismissal and Appellate Authority upholding the same. Accordingly I arrived at the conclusion of rejecting the reference holding that the action of the management isjustified.
10. In the result, I pass the following award :
AWARD
The reference is rejected holding that the action of the management of Karnataka Bank Ltd ,. Mangalore in dismissing Shri M. Ashok Kumar, Attender from service vide Bank's Order No. PIR 964/81 dated 11.07.1981 is legal and justified and he is not entitle for any reliefs.
(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 16.01.2012)
S.N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer
Annexure CR. No. 16/90
List ofwitness examined by the management before the EnquiryOfficer
MW1 1. Shri Ratnakar Bolar, Manager
MW2 2. Shri R. Ravindra Rao , Officer
MW3 3. Shri Shantharama Rao , Officer
Documents exhibited for the Management before the EnquiryOfficer
Ex. M1 1. Letter of the branch Manager dated 6.01.1979 addressed to Head Office
Ex. M2.
2. Letter of the branch Manager dated 22.03.1979 addressed to Head Office
Ex . M3 3. Charge sheet dated 20.02.1985 along with list of documents Letter of the branch Manager dated 22.03.1979 addressed to Head Office
Ex. M4 4. Letter of the Branch Manager dated 24.03.1979 addressed to Head Office
Ex. M5 5. Memo addressed to the first party dated 30.03.1979
Ex. M6 6. Reply letter of first party dated 14.04.1979
Ex. M7 7. Head office letter granting time upto 30.04.1979 to the first party ' dated 19.04.1979
Ex. M8 8. First party's reply to the memo dated 26.04.1979
Ex. M9 9. Branch Manager's letter dated 18.06.1979
Ex. M10 10. Charge Sheet issued to the first party dated 12.06.1979
Ex. M11 11. Pch Manager's letter dated 18.06.1979 2677 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
Ex. M34 12. Branch Manager's letter dated 26.06.1979 Ex. M12 34. Letter of R. Rao complaining first party's disobedience dated 3.10.1979
Ex. M13
Ex. M35 13. First Party's letter seeking time to reply to the charge sheet dated 30.6.1979
35. Letter addressed to the Head Office by thebranch manager dated 27.11.1979
Ex.M14
Ex. M36 14. Letter addressed to Head office by the BranchManager dated 2.07.1979
Ex. M15
36. Letter addressed of Head Office regarding service ofMemo to the first party dated 23.10.1979
15. Letter addressed to Head office by the Branch Manager dated 2.07.1979
Ex . M37
Ex .M15
37. Letter of the manager regarding refusal to accept the memo dated 3.11.1979
16. Letter addressed to Head office by the Branch Manager dated 14.07.1979
Ex. M38
Ex.M17
38. Letter addressed to the Head Office by thebranch manager dated 11.12.1979
17. Letter addressed to Head office by the Branch Manager dated 19.07.1979
Ex. M39
Ex.M18
39. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 12.12.1979
18. Office copy of Memo dated 20.7.1979
Ex. M40
Ex. M19 40. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 12.12.1979
19. Letter of the first party seeking further time to reply to the charge sheet dated 20.07.1979
Ex. M41
41. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 13.12.1979
Ex. M20
20. Letter addressed to the Head office by the Branch Manager dated 21.07.1979
Ex. M42
42. Letter addressed to the Head Officeby the branch manager dated 14.12.1979
Ex . M21
Ex. M43 21. Letter addressed to the Head office by the Branch Manager dated 23.07.1979
43. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 15.12.1979
Ex . M22
Ex. M44 22. Letter addressed to the Head office by the Branch Manager dated 30.07.1979
Ex. M23
23. Letter addressed to the Head office by the Branch Manager dated 21.07.1979
44. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 15.12.1979 regarding refusal to accept charge sheet by the first party.
Ex.M24
Ex.M45 24. Staff members representation dated 30.7.1979
45. Office copy of Banchmanagers letter to the first party dated 5.01.1980
EX .M25
Ex .M46
46. Letter of first party seeking copies etc.
dated 12.01.1980
25. Head Office letter addressed to first partygranting time to reply charge sheet dated 31.07.1979
Ex. M47
Ex. M26
47. Letter of head quarter regarding supply ofcopies to first party dated 18.02.1980
26. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the Branch Manager dated 22.8.1979
Ex. M48
48. Branch Manager's Letter addressed to
firstpartydated 20.02.1980
Ex. M27
27. Letter addressed to the Head Office by thebranch manager dated 22.8.1979
49. Reply to the charge sheet dated 2.03.1980
Ex. M49
Ex. M28
Ex.M50
50. Enquiry Notice dated 30.8.1980
28. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 26.8.1979
Ex.M51
Ex.M29
51. Letter of first party seeking time
dated 2.09.1980
29. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 26.8.1979
Ex . M52
52. Enquiry Notice dated 27.10.1980
Ex.M30
Ex.M53 30. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 31.8.1979
53. Letter of first party saying venue not cleared dated 6.11.1980
Ex. M31
Ex.M54
54. Enquiry notice dated 11.11.1980 .
31. Letter addressed to the Head Officeby the branch manager dated 1.9.1979
Ex. M55
55. Charge Sheet dated 14.12.1979
Ex. M32
Ex. M56 32. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 03.9.1979
Ex. M33
56. Endorsement by the manager and Ravindra Rao regarding refusal to accept the charge sheet by the first party dated 15.12.1979
33. Letter addressed to the Head Office by the branch manager dated 03.10.1979 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2678
Ex. M57
57. Attendence Register of the Balmatta Branch for 1979-80
Regional Director (OS) Uttar Pradesh Bhartiya Reserve Bank GomtiNagar Lucknow.
List ofwitnesses examined for the first party before the EnquiryOfficer.
Nil
AWARD
List of documents marked for the First Party before the enquiryofficer
1. Authorisation in favour of Shri A. Achuta Ex. El Nalluraya, President of the Karnataka Bank StaffAssociation
S. N. NAVALGUND , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
1. By order No. L- 12011 / 04 /2008_IR ( B- I ) dated: 23.05.2008 the Central Government in the Ministey of Labour, New Delhi in Exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) ofSection 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Chief Secretary, Reserve Bank Workers Union, Gomti Nagar , C/ o RBI , Lucknow and Regional Director (OS ) , Uttar Pradesh , Bhartiya Reserve Bank, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow for adjudication.
2. The reference under adjudication:
का०आ० 1092.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक पबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23.02.2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं॰एल॰- 12011/04/2008- आई० आर० ( बी -1 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
"KYA PRABANDHAN , BHARTIYA RESERVE BANK, LUCKNOW DWARA UNION KE VIVAAD KE SAATH SANLAGNA RESERVE BANK OF INDIA , KENDRIYA KAARYAALAYA KA PATRA DECEMBER 01 , 1987 JISME EK COMPLEX ΚΑΙΝ 100 YAA ADHIK STAFF QUARTERS HONE PAR VAHAN SURAKSHA GUARD KE LIYE BANK MAIN KAARYARAT CHATURTH SHRENI KARMACHARIYON KO LAGAAI JAANE PAR VICHAAR NA KARMA VA BAAHRI AGENCY SE OUT SOURCING KAR SURAKSHA GUARD LAAGAYA JANA NAYAYOCHIT EVAM VAIDH HAI ? KAAMGAAR KIS RAAHAT KA HAKDAAR HAI? "
S.O. 1092.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 33/2008 of the Cen . Govt. Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bhartiya Reserve Bank, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012
[No. L- 12011/04/2008 - IR(B - I) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
3. The workman's union filed present claim against the alleged unjust action of the management for outsourcing watch and ward services from private security agencies regarding taking care of staff colonies . The Management ofthe Reserve Bank of India has denied the allegation of the workman's union and has justified their action by way of filing their written statement.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
4. The workman's union reiterated his averments already made in their statement of claim . The parties field photocopy of documents in support their respective claim and next date was fixed for workman's evidence .
PRESENT:
Dr. Manju Nigam , Presiding Officer
I.D. No 33/2008
Ref. No. L- 12011 /04/2008 - IR (B- 1) dated : 23.05.2008 BETWEEN:
5. On 14.12.2011 , when the representatives of the parties were present , the workman's union moved an application , W-29 , stating therein that settlement negotiations , with the management, is in process and , as such is not interested to pursue he present industrial dispute .However, next date 16.12.2011 was fixed .
6.On 16.12.2012, an affidavit , W-31 was filed by the workman's union ; wherein para 04 of the said affidavit it has been stated as under :
ChiefSecretary Reserve Bank Workers Union Gomti Nagar , C/ o RBI Lucknow.
"That the issues relating to the dispute are being AND 2679
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
[भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
discussed with the Management of RBI at Mumbai and as such the deponent/claimant is not interested in pursuing the dispute . "
And accordingly, prayed this Tribunal to decide the present industrial dispute with suitable orders .
7. In view ofthe subinission of the workman's union there is no need to decided the reference order on merit and the same is disposed of as there is no grievance left with the workman . The Trade Union's case for relief claimed stands withdrawn. Hence , no relief is required to be given to the workman concerned . The matter is resolved accordingly and the reference is also answered accordingly.
8. Award as above .
Dr.Manju Nigam , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
का०आ० 1093. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23.02.2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं०एल०-12011 / 10/2010- आई० आर० ( बी- [ ) ]
रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February 2012
S.O. .1093 .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 12/2011 of the Cen. Govt. Indus . Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the managemem of Bhartiya Reserve Bank, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012
[No. 1. - 12011 / 10/2008 )-IR(B - I) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW
PRESENT:
Dr. Manju Nigam , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 12/2011
Ref. No. L- 12011 / 10/2010 10- IR ( B - I) dated 10.02.2011
BETWEEN:
The Chief Secretary
Reserve Bank Workers Union
C/o RBI , Lucknow
(Espousing cause of Shri Rama Kant Dixit )
AND
TheRegional Director Uttar Pradesh & Uttranchal Reserve Bank of India 08/9, Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow.
AWARD
1. By order No. L - 12011 / 10/2010 10- IR(B - 1) dated: 10.02.2011 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, NewDelhi in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofsub section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between the Chief Secretary, Reserve Bank Workers Union , C / o RBI , Lucknow and the Regional Director, Uttar Pradesh & Uttranchal, Reserve Bank of India, 08/9, Vipin Khand ,Gomti Nagar, Lucknow for adjudication .
2. The reference under adjudication is :
"WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, LUCKNOW IN NOT APPOINTING SHRI RAMA KANT DIXIT, SECURITY GUARD AS DRIVER BULLION VAN AFTER TAKING DUTIES OF BULLION VAN DRIVER ON DAILY NEED BASIS FROM THE YEAR 2003 TΟ 22.09/ 2008 ON THE BASIS OF PENAL PREPARED AFTER TAKING SKILL TEST AND INTERVIEW AT THAT TIME, IS LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED ? TO WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED? "
3. On receipt of the reference order the workman's union was issued registered notice and was called upon to file its statement of claim with list of reliance and list of witnesses on 31.03.2011 ; and thereafter several opportunities were afforded to the workman's union for the same at their request ; but the failed to do file any till 21.09.2011 . On 21.09.2011 , when the representative ofthe parties were present, the workman's union moved an application stating therein that settlement negotiations , with the management , is in process and requested for some date. Accordingly, further time was granted to the workman'sunion .
4. On 16.12.2012, an affidavit , W- 11 was failed by the workman'sunion; wherein para 04 of the said affidavit it has been stated as under:
"That the issue relating to the dispute are being discussedwith the Management ofRBI atMumbai and as such the deponent/claimant is not interested in pursuing the dispute. "
And accordingly, prayed this Tribunal to decide the present industrial dispute with suitable orders .
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH
2680
5. Inview ofthe submission of the workman's union there is no need to decide the reference order on merit and the same is disposed of as there is no grievance left with the workman . The Trade Union's case for relief claimed stands withdrawn . No relief is required to be given to the workman concerned . The matter is resolved accordingly and the reference is also answered accordingly.
6. Award as above .
Dr. MANJU NIGAM . Prisiding Officer
LUCKNOW 7.02.2012
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
का०आ० 1094.-- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कान्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक पबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्देिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 64/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[संख्या एल -12012/182/96- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क, अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
bank) came into existence in the year 1955. In 1958 Shri Brij Mohan Gogna was employed as messenger at New Delhi branch of the bank . In those days , no formal educational qualifications were required for appointment to the post of messenger except that the appointee was able to read and write. An appointee to the post of messenger could furnish any document for proof of his date of birth , such as school leaving certificate , if any, or an affidavit detailing his date of birth . Shri Gogna furnished his date of birth as 20th March , 1935. He was confirined to the post of messenger on 1.3.1959 . On completion of eight years of service as messenger, he was allowed to undergo slection process for the post of Godown Keeper/Record Keeper. His documents were scrutinized and he was called for written test and interview by the bank, vide letter dated 11.1.1969. Hequalified written test and interview and was promoted asGodown Keeper with effect from 22.11.1969 . In his provident fund nomination from he gave the same date of birth. On the basis of the date of birth so furnished by Shri Gogra, he was superannuated from the services of the bank on 31.3.1995 . After his superannuation , he raised a dispute to the effect that his date of birth was 14.3.1937 and he was wrongly superannautaed from services . When no settlement could arrive at between the parties , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. 1-12012/182/96- IR(B - 1), New Delhi , dated 18th September , 1997 , with the following terms: -
S.O. 1094.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 64/2011 ) ofthe Central Tribunal-cum - Labour Court Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman , received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012 .
"Whether the statement of the workman Shri B.M. Gogna, Record Keeper /Godown Keeper that he has been illegally retired before his due retirement age , therefore , has been terminated from service of the management isjustified ? Ifnot, to what reliefworkman concerned is entitled to ? "
[No. L- 12012/ 182/96- IR(B - I) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO . I, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX : DELHI
I.D. No. 64/2011
Workman
Shri Brij MohanGogna H.No. 912 , Gali Inder Wali , Kucha Pati Ram, Delhi-110006.
Versus
The Dy. General Manager,
State Bank of India, ZonalOffice , 11 , Sansad Marg, NewDelhi .
Management
AWARD
2.Claim statement was filed by Shri Gogna pleading therein that he joined services of the bank as messenger at its New Delhi branch on 12.5.1958 . He was confirmed in the service of the bank on 1.3.1959 . After confirmation , he became member of State Bank of India Provident Fund Scheme, on completion of formalities . He projects that at the time ofjoining service of the bank it is essential for an employee to submit his school leaving / educational certificate as proof of his age . An employee is not allowed to join his duty without submission of age proof. He submitted a copy of his school leaving certificate issued bythe Adarsh Janta Vidhalya , Farid Nagar, Meerut (herein after referred to as the school ) . His date of birth is 14.3.1937 asprojected in the certificate issued by the school , from where he passed 8th standard examination . The bank verified the certificate , so furnished , and accepted an attested copy of it at the time of his joining services ofthe bank . His educational qualification and date of birth were entered in the record, when his service record was prepared atthe time of his confirmation in the service of the bank .
State Bank of India (herein after reffered to as the 2681 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
3. Shri Gogna presents that in 1968-69 the bank started a scheme for promotion of subordinate staff to the post of GodownKeeper /Record Keeper , on completion of 8 years of service and attaining 8th standard educational qualification. On9thSeptember, 1969 , the Foreign Exchange Branch ofthe bank issued a memo and called upon him to produce documentary evidence in support of the fact that he had attended school up to 8th standard . Hiseducational qualifications were already noted in the service record , yet the bank wanted to satisfy itself again in respect of his educational qualifications . He again submitted a copy of school leaving certificate to the bank . On scrutiny of the said certificate and after being satisfied, the bank called him for written test and interview for promotion to the post of GodownKeeper/ Record Keeper, vide memo dated 1.11.1969. Onbeing declared siccessful in test and interview, he was promoted as Godown Keeper with effect from 22.11.1969.
was hatched to victimize him . He was placed under suspension on 12.11.1994 on false and flimsy charges . He was threatened that in case he would not accepted his date ofbirth as 20.3.1935 , he would be dismissed from service of the bank. He was forced to write a letter, seeking retirement on the basis of false date of birth , recorded in his service records . An apology was obtained from him and on 31.3.1995 , punishment of censure on charge sheets dated 8.3.1995 and 16.3.1995 was awarded to him . On that very day, he was retired from service at the close of business hours . He had no alternative but to succumb to illegal designs of the bank authorities . He projects that the date ofbirth , as mentioned in the school record , is authentic proof of age of an employee . He was wrongly retired by the bank. He claims that an award may be passed in his favour , directing the bank to treat him in its active service from 1.4.1995 to 31.3.1997 and to pay full wages and other consequential benefits for the said period .
4. Shri Gogna details that an employee of the bank superannuates on reaching age of 60 years . The bank grants him extension for two years , a few months before the age of 58 years , subject to his being found physically fit, by the Medical Officer of the bank. As per old rules , service beyond 58 years of age was not to be counted for pension. However, in terms of bipartite settlement dated 30.1.1995 , which came in force with effect from 1.11.1993 , service of an employee up to the age of 60 years is reckoned towards pension .
5. Shri Gogna declares that throughout his entire service with the bank, he was holding post of the Secretary, Siate Bank of India Staff Association , at its variouis units . He was an activce officer bearer of the Association and used to challenge arbitary, illegal and malafide activities of certain officials of the bank . In May, 1987 , he was transferred from Ketdwar branch to South Extension , Part - I , New Delhi , branch of the bank. While posted at South Extension , Part- i branch , he wrote various letter to Higher authorities in respect of fraud and malafide activities carried out by the Branch Manager, but senior officers of the bank tried to protect him . The Branch Manager became vindictive and altered his date ofbirth in his service record. He was illegally retired form the service of the bank in March , 1995, by altering his date of birth from 14.3.1937 to 20.3.1935.
7. The claim was demurred by the bank pleading that the claimant had furnished his date of birth as 20.3.1935 , in letters dated 19.3.1995 , 31.3.1995 and 28.7.1995 , besides provident fund form and as such is estopped from challenging the same. It has been pleaded that he joined services of the bank as messenger on 1.9.1958 and not on 12.5.1958 . However, the bank concedes that he was confirmed as messenger in service of the ban on 1.3.1959. The bank explains that in 1958 an employee , joining as messenger, was required to give his date of birth by any form ofdocument, including an affidavit to that effect . The date of birth , so furnished , was to be accepted as such , unless it was contrary to record . It has been disputed that in September 1958 the claimant furnished an attested copy of his school leaving certificate issued by the School and on scrutiny of school leaving certtificate so submitted , he was called upon to appear in written test and interview for the post of Record Keeper/Godown Keeper. It is not disputed that the claimant was promoted as Godown Keeper. It has been denied that an impression was given to the claimant that his date of birth was recorded as 14.3.1937. The bank pieads that he had filled in Provident Fund form in the year 1968 , wherein he has mentioned his date of birth as 20.3.1935 .
8.Thebank concedes that as per rules an empoyee was normally to retire on attaining age of 58 years . The bank was empowered to grant extension to such an employee upto the age of 60 years , on his being found physically fit and efficient . The service beyond age of 58 years was not to be counted for pension. It was the criteria of physical fitness and efficiency which were resorted to by the bank for granting extension in service . Subsequently bipartite settlement dated 30.1.1995 made provisions to reckon service of an employee up to the age of 60 years for pensionary benefits .
6.He made various representation against the said act of the bank but no body listened him . He asserts that for the first time he was advised by the bank, vide letter dated 19.3.1995 , that he was to retire on 19.3.1995 . He was called upon to submit forins for payment of gratuity duly completed by 7.12.1994 . Prior to that he was always given an impression that his date of birth was recorded in his service record as 14.3.1937 . On receipt ofthat letter he was shocked . He made a representation to the bank authorities alleging that his date of birth has been wrongly recorded, by playing a mischief. He made specific allegations against certain officials of the bank , projecting that a conspiracy
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
2682 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
9. The bank disputes that during his entire service 12.5.1958 . At the time ofjoining his services, he submitted
the claimant was holding post of Secretary, State Bank of copyofthe school leaving certificate issued by the School ,
wherein his date of birth is recorded as 14.3.1937 . He had
India StaffAssociation . It has been projected that during a
portion of his total service , the claimant was Secretary of passed 8th standard examination from the said school . The
the said Staff Association . It has been denied that as a bank verified the said certificate at the time of his joining
Secretary he challenged arbitrary, illegal and malafide the service and used it as record for proof of his age and
activities of certain bank officials . It has been detailed that qualification. In 1968-69 a scheme for promotion, from
the claimant was in the habit of making frivolous amongst subordinate staff who had rendered eight years
allegations against bank officials , which were subsequently of service and possessed 8th standard qualification to the
proved to be false in the inquiry. It has been denied that post of Godown Keeper/Record Keeper, was introduced.
the Branch Manager had altered his date of birth with Memo dated 9th September , 1969 , was served upon him
malafide intention to victimize him . Claim is made that his and he was called upon to submit documentary evidence
date of birth was recorded in the service records as insupport of his having passed 8th standard examination .
20.3.1935 , as per his own assertions . The bank again scrutinized the said school leaving
certificate and on being satisfied he was called for written
10. Since the claimant was in the habit of making test and interview for promotion to the post of Godown
frivolous allegations against officials of the bank, used Keeper/Record Keeper. When he qualified the written test
abusive and unparliamentary language and slapped and interview he was promoted as Godown Keeper with
Manager (Accounts ), hence he was placed under effect from 22.11.1969 . The bank and retired him on
suspension on 12.11.1994 . Charge sheets dated 8.3.1995 31.3.1995, in an illegal manner with a view to victimize him.
and 16.3.1995 were served upon him . The charges stood During the course of his cross -examination he concedes
proved in the inquiry conducted in consonance with the thathe filled in Provident Fund Form on 3.4.1968 . He has
principles of natural justice . However, vide letter dated not disputed letter dated 19.3.1995, written by him to the
19.3.1995 the claimant sought pardon and a symphonic bank. However, he claims that the said letter was obtained
view. Since he was to retire on 31.3.1995 a lenient view was under duress .
taken and punishment of censure was awarded to him.
Vide letters dated 22.1.1994 and 6.12.1994 the claimant was 15. Ms. Neeta Bhargava swears in her affidavit
called upon to furnish requisite particulars so as to enable Ex.RW- 1 / 1 that the claimant had projected his date ofbirth
the bank to release his retiral benefits . He filed to furnish as 20.3.1935 in letters dated 19.3.1995, 31.3.1995 and
the requisite information . His retiral benefits were delayed 28.7.1995 , besides his Provident Fund declaration form
due to non compliance on his part . It has been claimed that dated3.4.1968 .According to her, in the year 1958 it was not
the date of birth as 20.3.1935 was recorded in the bank mandatory for an employee to furnish his date of birth ,
record as per assertion on the claimant and a such he was school leaving certificate and educational qualification
rightly superannuated on 31.3.1995 . The bank asserts that certificate as proof of his age , when he was to join the post
grievances , projected by the claimant , are un - called for. ofmessenger . The claimant did not submit copy of school
leaving certificate issued by the School . His date of birth
11. The claimant has examined himself in support of wasrecorded s 20.3.1935 in service record . He was rightly
his claim . Ms. Neeta Bhargava was examined on behalf of retired in March, 1995. During the course of her cross-
the bank to rebut the claim . examination she projects that original record pertaining to
12. Vide order No. Z-22019/6/2007 - IR (C- II ) dated date ofbirth of Shri Gongna was not available in her office .
11.02.2008 , the case was transferred to the Central Govt . 16. When facts testified by Shri Gongna and Ms.
Industrial Tribunal No. 2, New Delhi for adjudication. It Bhargava were appreciated it came to light that in 1958 the
was retransferred to this Tribunal , Vide order No. Z-22019/ bank was not insisting for submission of school leaving
5/2007 - IR (C - II ) New Delhi , dated 30.3.2011 , for disposal . certificate as proof of age , when an appointee was to join a
13.Arguments were heard at the bar. Claimant raised post of messenger. The claimant joined the post of
arguments in person . Shri Rajat Arora , authorized messenger on 12.5.1958 and was confirmed as such on
representative , presented facts on behalf of the bank. 1.3.1959. He filled in the Provident fund form on 3.4.1968
Written submissions were filed on behalf of the claimant . I wherein he had mentioned his date of birth as 20.3.1935 .
have given my careful considerations to the argurarguments ProvidentFundform was admittedly filled in by the claimant
advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. in his own hand- writing. In that form he projects that the
My findings on the issues involved in the controversy are joined services of the bank as messenger on 1.9.1958 and
as follows: was confirmed to that post on 1.3.1959 . He details therein
thathis date ofbirth is 20.3.1935 . No explanation has been
14. In his affidavit Ex . WW- 1 /A the claimant swears offered by the claimant as to under what circumstances he
that he joined services of the bank as messenger on filled in his date of birth as 20.3.1935 in the Provident Fund
[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
2683 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
form.
(bb) termination of the services of the workman as a result of the non - renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or
(c) termination of the services of a workman on the ground of continued ill- health " .
17. Though the claimant projects that he furnished his shool leaving certificate to the bank wherein his date of birth is mentioned as 14.3.1937 , yet he opts not to explain as to why he mentioned his date of birth as 20.3.1935 in PF form. Certificate, purporting to have been issued by the School has been placed on record. This document neither bears the signatures of the principal nor date of its issuance by the School . When a document does not contain signatures of issuing authority, it does not have any evidentiary value . In view of these facts his document cannot espouse the cause of the claimant . Even otherwise hisown admission of age recorded in Provident Fund form esstopes him from challenging that fact . He cannot approbate and reprobate facts mentioned by him in Provident Fund form , relating to his date of birth. Further more in letters dated 19.3.1995 , 31.3.1995 and 28.7.1995 , he projects that he was to retire from service of the bank on 31.3.1995 , on attaining age of 60 years . Consequently it is evident that claimant was well aware that he was to retire from the service ofthe bank on 31.1.1995 , on attaining age of60 years . It does not lie in his mouth to agitate that his dateofbirth is 14.3.1937 .
20. Definition of retrenchment is very wide and in two parts . The first part is exhaustive, which lays down that retrenchment means the termination of the service ofa workman by the employer " for any reason whatsoever " otherwise then as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action . Thus main part of the definition itself excludes the termination of service , as a measure of punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action from theambit of retrenchment . The second part further excludes (i) voluntary retirement of the workman, or ( ii ) retirement of workman on reaching the age of superannuation , or ( iii) termination of the service of a workman as a result of non- renewal of contract of employment, or (iv) termination of contract of employment in terms of a stipulation contained in the contract of employment in that behalf, or (v) termination of service on the ground ofcontinued ill health ofthe workman. Reference can be made to the precedents inAvon Services ( Production Agencies) ( Pvt .) . Ltd. ( 1979 (1) LLI 1 ) and Mahabir (1979 ( II) LLI 363.)
18.Letter dated 31.3.1995 was written by the claimant to Assistant General Manager of the bank wherein he pleaded that he may be dealt leniently, while awarding penalty for his mis- conduct . He presented that he was to retire from the service that day and has a family to support , hence leniency in punishment was called for. His request was considered and punishemnt of censure was awarded to him . Subsequently on 20.7.1995 he again projected that he retired on 31.3.1995 . After his retirement he raised false a claim as to his age. He could not substantiale that his date ofbirth is 14.3.1937, which was altered as 20.3.1935 , with a view to victimize him.
19. Whether retirement of the claimant on reaching age of superannuation amounts to retrenchment? For an answer, definition of the term is to be construed. Clause (00 ) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act) defines retrenchment . For sake of convenience, the said definition is as extracted thus :
" (00) " " retrenchment " means the termination by the employer of the services of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action , but does not include-
(a) voluntary retirement of the workman ; or
21. Retirement of an employee on reaching the age of superannuation has been excluded from the definition of retrenchment, as given in clause ( oo) of section 2 of the Act . For a case to come under sub - clause (b) of clause (oo) of section 2 of the Act, two things are necessary : ( i ) there must be stipulation on the point of retirement in the contract, and ( ii ) the stiuplation must be with regard to the age of superannuation . The expression "Contract of employment " means a contract under which an employee was accepted in service. As detailed , two conditions referred above , are established by the bank. It is an accepted case that there was a contract ofemployment, wherein a stipulation exists with regard to age of superannuation . An employee is to retire on reaching age of 60 years . As discussed above , the claimant reached age of 60 years on 19.3.1995 and was rightly superannuated on 31.3.1995 . Hence his retirement on reaching the age of superannuation nowhere amounts to retrenchment. Action of the bank is justified . Claimant is not entitled to any relief. Therefore, I do not find any substance in his demand . His claim is found to be untenable. The same is , therefore , dismissed. An award is , accordingly, passed.
(b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or
Dr. R.K. Yadav, Presiding Officer
686 GI /2012-26 SEC. 3(11 )]
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
ORAL AWARD
(Date: 10-1-2012)
The Central Government through Ministry ofLabour in exercise ofpowers conferred u/s . 10 ( 1 ) (d) read with Sec . 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act referred following industrial dispute between the above named parties for its adjudication by this Tribunal , the dispute mentioned in the Sechedule to the Reference Order is as under:
काआ 1095.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दी सरस्वट् को-ओपरेटिव बैंक लि के प्रबंध तत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण पुणे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -12012 / 20/2009 - आई०आर० ( बी- I ) ]
रमेश सिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
" Whether the action of the management of the Saraswat Cooperative Bank Limited , ofdismissing theservices of Shri Ashok Shidhaye on the ground of sexual harassment , for which he has been acquitted by the judicial magistrate, is justified ? If not, what relief is he entitled to ? " S.O. 1095.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref.14/2009 of the Industrial Tribunal PUNE ( MAHARASHTRA ) as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of The Sarswat Co- opt . BankLTd. , and their workman, received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012 .
[No. L- 12012/20/2009- IR(B- I) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
(2) In response to the notice issued by this Tribunal the Second Party workman appeared and filed Statement of Claim at Exh . U-2 and contended that he was in the employment ofthe First Party as a Clerk since 1991 having unblemished service record however, First Party issued him chargesheet Dt. 5.1.2007. Thereafter, according to the Second Party illegal enquiry held on that basis enquiry officer drawn perverse finding and First Party terminated hisservice by Order Dt . 6-8.2008 . Thus , to challenge the termination , the Second Party has raised an industrial dispute vide the present Reference.
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT PUNE
Reference ( I.T. ) No. 14/2009
Managing Director ,
The Saraswat Coop . Bank Limited, Mandhushree , Plot No. 85 , Distt . Business Centre , Sec . 7 , Vashi , Navi Mumbai-400 703
--FirstParty
V/s.
Shri Ashok Keshav Shidhye
B -B 37 , Swapna Shilpa, Ganesh Nagar, PUNE- 411029
(3) The First Party in his written say denied the contention of the Second Party workman in the Statement ofClaim and contended that the First Party is a cooperative society registered under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 1984 and engaged in the business carrying out banking activities having number of branches located not only in Maharashtra State but in various places outside the Maharashtra as such the appropriate Government in relation to First Party is a State Government and not the Central Government as such according to the First Party the present Reference is not maintainable . The First Party has also raised the objection in relation to territorial jurisdiction of this Tribunal .
--Second Party.
CORAM:
M.G. Choudhary, PresidingOfficer,
(4) This court on the basis of application made by the First Party at Exh . C- 8 framed the following issued at Exh . 0-4 which arise for my determination.
APPEARANCES :
(1) Whether appropriate Government for First Party industry is a Central Government or State Government ?.
Shri R. Y. Joshi , Adv. for First Party.
(2) Whether this Tribunal has territorial jurisdiction to decide the Reference ?
Shri N.A. Kulkarni , Adv. for Second Party.
(3) What Award?
(5) My findings to above issuess for the reasons recorded below are as under- [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2685 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
( 1) State Government .
(2) Does not survice .
(3) Reference stand rejected as per Award below.
REASONS
the nature , therefore , no fault can be found with the order holding that the Reference made by the Central Government is not valid . However, this finding does not prevent the Respondent No. 1 /Petitioner from approaching the appropriate Government for making a Reference .
3. In case the State Government agrees to make a Reference and the Reference is actually made , it is obvious that , that Reference will have to be decided by the Labour Court on the basis of the material prouced before it, without being influenced by anything said either by the Labour Corut or by a learned Single Judge ofthis Court in the proceedings pursuant to Reference made by the Central Government.
4. In the event of a fiesh Reference being made by the State Government , all contentions shall be open to both the sides to be raised before the Court .
5. The appeal is disposed off . "
(6) Both the parties have produced documents on record . The Second Party in order to prove his case in support of above issues deposed in the matter at Exh . U -7 and in his Examination - in - Chief by way ofAffidavit ne nas stated the same thing as per his stand in his Statement of claim as weli as Affidavit . In Cross- examination he has admitted that he was in the employment at the Indoor branch . Questions were put to him as to whether First Party is registered under the Cooperative Societies Act . Questions were also put to hint about residential address was communicated to the First Party etc. He has admitted that First Party is Multi State Cooperative Bank having branches in many states . The First Party has examined Shri Kothawale Gangadhar Bhiva at Exh . C- 9 and in his Examination - in-Chiefhe has stated the same thing as per stand of the First Party in application Exh . C- 8 .In Cross-examination , questions were put to him about the chargesheet given to the Second party, his termination taken place at Indoor . The communication sent by the Second Party about his Pune address etc.
(8) Admittedly, the First Party is registered under Multi State Cooperative Soc ies Act and above Reference ismade to this Tribunal by the Central Government and reling on the ratio laid down in aforesaid case - law, I hold that the State Government is appropriate Government in relation to the First Party as such the Reference made by the Central Government to this Tribunal is not maintainable, hence I answer: ssue No. 1 accordingly.
(9) In view of my findings on Issue No. 1 that in relation to the First Party the appropriate Government is the State and the Reference is not maintainable as such the Issue No. 2 does not survive at all to be decided by this Tribunal , hence , I answer Issue No. 2 accordingly.
(10) In view of my findings on above Issues , it is clear that Reference is liable to be rejected, hence , I pass the following Award.
AWARD
(7) With the help of material on record I have heard the arguments of both the parties at length and both of them have submitted their case as per material on record. The Advocate for First party in support of his argument retted on the case- law reported in 2007 II C.L.R. PAGE- 160- BHARAT COOPERATIVE BANK ( Mumbai ) V/s. CO- OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES UNION in which Hon'ble Apex Court has held, " in relation to multi State Cooperative Bank , carrying on business in more than one state, would be the State Goverment " . The Advocate for First party also relied on the case- law ie. order of Hon'ble High Court in L.PA. No. 28753 of2011 in Writ Petition No. 4243 of2011 . The copy oforder Dt . 1-12-2011 is produced with list Exh . -12 wherein the First Party is the Respondent in the said ... P. A. In which Hon'ble Bombay High Court has observed as under:
( 1) Reference ( I.T.) No. 14/2009 stands rejected as not maintainable .
" 1. Heard the learned Counsel for both the sides.
(2) No order as to costs .
(3) Copies of this Award be sent to the appropriate Government for necessary action.
M.G. Choudhry, Presiding Officer 2. Now the law , because of the Judgement of the Supreme Court , is well settled that though the Respondent No. I is a multi Co- operative Bank , the State Government is the appropriate Govt . In this view of
Pune:
Dt: 10/01/2012
2686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27, 1933
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2012
का०आ० 1096.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैनेज़मैन्ट आफ सैन्ट्रल फाउल रिसर्च इन्स्टीट्यूट, धनवाद प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनवाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 39 ऑफ 2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकारको 23-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -42011 /42/2008- आई आर ( डी यू) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
"Whether the action of the management of Director , Central Fuel Research Institute, Dhanbad, in denying compassionate appointment to Shri Saratal Ali , son of Late Md. Refiquddin , Shri Prahlad Gupta, son of late Lare Madan Gupta, Shri Rameshwar Mahato , son of Late Somara Mahato , Shri Radheyshyam Yadav, son of Late Laxman Yadav, Shri Sandeep Minz, son of Late S.P. Minz , Mrs. Radha Devi wife of Late J.P. Singh , Shri Syed Muzaffar Hasan, son of Late S.M. Naseem , Shri Sudama Singh , son of Late Rash Bihari Singh , Shri Dadhibal Yadav son of Late Dular Ahir and Shri Suraj Sharma son of late R.N. Sharma is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the above legal representatives are entitled to? "
2.None represented the union/petitioners nor written statement has been filed even till today. But Mr. Aditya Kumar , the Ld . Advocate for the management is present .
S.O. 1096.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 39 of 2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 2 Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between The Employers in relation to The Management of Central Fuel Research Institute , Dhanbad and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-02-2012
[No. L-42011/42/2008 - IR (DU) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL( No. 2) AT DHANBAD.
PRESENT
Perusal of the case record manifests that it has been pending for filing written statement since 31.3.2011 , for which Regd. noticesdt . 31.2.2011 , 20.5.2011 , 18.10 , 2011 and 20.12.2011 have been issued to the Gen. Secretary of the sponsoring union on his address as noted in the reference . Even then neither the union representatives nor the petitioner Sri Sartal Ali and nine others appeared in this case which is related to an issue about the denial of the management to their compassionate appointment . The conduct of the union representative and the petitioner shows that they are not willing to proceed with the case .
SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer .
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 ) ( d) of the I.D.Act . , 1947
In view of the aforesaid disinterestedness of the union as well as the petitioner, proceeding with the case of infinity is worthless . Hence the case is closed and accordingly an order of no dispute is passed
KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . 39 OF 2008 .
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012 PARTIES: Employer in relation to the management of Central Fuel Research Institute , FRI Dhanbad and their workmen.
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the employer : Mr. Aditya Kumar , Ld. Adv .
State: Jharkhand Industry Research Institute
का० आ० 1097.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण मेंकेन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुपरेन्टेन्डेन्ट आफ पोस्ट आफिस , धनतोली नागपुर एण्ड अदर्स प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या - सी० जी० आई० टी०/एन० जी०पी०/63/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Dated , Dhanbad , the 13th Feb. , 2012 .
ORDER
[सं॰एल -40012/23/ 1996- आई आर ( डी यू) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012 The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1 ) ( d) of the 1.D.Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-42011/42/2008 - IR ( DU) dated 17.7.2008
S.O. 1097. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governrnent hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ NGP/63 / 2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2687 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
Tribunal- cum - Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between The Senior Suptd . of Post Offices, Dhantoli , Nagpur and other and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23-02-2012
[No. L-40012/23/1996- IR(DU) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No. CGIT/NGP/63 /2002
Date: 10.02.2012
Party No.1 (a) : The Post Master General , Nagpur Region , Maharashtra Circle, Shankar Nagar, Nagpur-440010.
(t) : The Sr. Supt. of Post Offices , Nagpur , MFL Division , Dhantoli , Nagpur-440012.
Versus
PartyNo. 2 : Shri Shalikram Pandurang Sawalakhe , R /o . and PO: Mandesar , Tah. Mohadi , Distt .Bhandara . (MS)
AWARD
(Dated: 10th February, 2012)
The case of the workman as projected inthe statement of claim is that a new branchof the post office at Mandesar was opened and he applied for the post of the Branch Postmaster of the Branch Post Office ofMandesar, as per the notice displayed in the office of the Gram Sevak and Gram Panchayat Mandesar and he was selected for appointment as Extra Departmental Branch Post Master, ( "EDPBM " in short) and he also executed the fidelity guarantee bond of Rs. 2000/- and he was given the charge of the EDBPM , but no appointment order was given and his appointment was an oral appointment and he joined the service on 28.05.1993 with a salary of Rs . 275 / - per month and he continuously discharged his duty as the EDBPM from 28.05.1993 and there was no complaint against him and his performance was to the satisfaction of party no.1 and as such , he ought to have been made permanent after completing 240 days continuous service as EDBPM , but instead of making him permanent, the party no . 1 terminated his services w.e.f. 08.02.1994 on the ground that his appointment was temporary and one Shri Bangre has beenappointed after due selection and the termination of his services was without any notice of retrenchment or payment of retrenchment compensation and without displaying the seniority list and the action of the Party No. 1 was in violation of the provisions of chapter V-A and V- B of the Act and thus the termination dated 08.02.1994 amounts to retrenchment and the appointment of Shri Bangre was not in accordance to the recruitment rules and he gave one approach notice to party no . 1 on 15.02.1995 , but the party no. 1 did not give any reply to the same and as the order of termination is illegal , he is entitled for reinstatement in service with all consequential reliefs.
Inexercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of ub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of ndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) ( " the Act " in hort), the Central Government had referred the industrial ispute between the employers , in relation to the management of Post Office and their workman Shri Shalikram Sawalakhe, to CGIT- cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur adjudication , as per letter No. L-40012/23/ 1996- IR (DU) Rated 29.01.98 , with the following schedule:-
"Whether the action of the Post Master General , Nagpur Region , Maharashtra Circle, Shankar Nagar, Nagpur and the Sr. Suptd. of Post Offices , Nagpur MFL Division , Dhantoli , Nagpur in terminating the services of Shri Shalikram Pandurang Sawalakhe , a casual branch postmaster w.e.f. 08.02.1994, is legal , proper and justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to? "
Subsequently, the case was transferred to this Tribunal for adjudication in accordance with law.
2.Onreceipt ofthe reference , the parties were noticed file their respective statement of claim and written tement and accordingly, the woman , Shri Shalikram Sawalakhe ( " the workman " in short) filed his statement of haim and the management of the Post Offices ( " Party No. in short) filed its written statement .
3. The party no . 1 in its written statement has pleaded inter- alia that as there was persistent demand for opening ofa branch post office at Mandesar, the Chief Post Master General Mumbai , vide memo dated 13.05.1993 conveyed the approval for opening the post office with effect from 28.05.1993 and as the procedure of making regular recruitment was not possible with - in period of 8 days , the charge of BPM was handed over to Shri S.P. Sawalakhe , the Sarpanch ( the workman) of the village and the new postoffice was opened in village Mandeshar in the premises chosen by the Sarpanch and he was requested to work in the stop gap arrangement till the regular appointment is made d simultaneously, action to fill up the post of regular BPM was taken up and notification was issued for the same and in response to the notification , the workman was sponsored by the employment exchange along with 3 others and all of them were called for the interview and finally, Shri P.D. Bangre , who had secured maximum marks in 10th standard amongst those 4 candidates and who had also fulfilled the other requisite conditions was selected as the EDBPM on regular basis and as such, the temporary arrangement for the post of the BPM Mandeser of the workman was terminated on 08.02.1994 and therefore , there isno merit in the case of the workman and the workman is not entitled for any relief.
2688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012 4. It is necessary to mention here that though the workman had filed his evidence on affidavit, he did not appear for his cross - examination , so , order was passed not to consider his evidence while deciding the reference . It is also necessary to mention here that the evidence of S.Kumar, who was examined on behalf of the management as a witness remained unchallenged , as none appears on behalf of the workman to cross - exmine him .
S.O. 1098.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 53/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour- cum-Labour Court- 2 Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . CCL, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012 .
[No. L-20012/301 /2003- IR (C-I)] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2), AT DHANBAD 5. It is well settled that when a workman raises a dispute challenging the validity of the termination of the service , it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the workman fails to appear or to file written statement or to produce evidence , the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in favour ofthe workman and he could not be entitled to any relief. PRESENT:
Shri Kishori Ram , Presiding Officer.
Inthe matter ofan Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1)(d) ofthe 1.D. Act . , 1947 .
Reference No. 53 of 2004
Parties:
Employers relation to the management of Bhurkunda Colliery ofM/ sC.C. Ltd. and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
6. In this case , the documents filed by the parties show that the appointment of the workman was on temporary basis as a stop gap arrangement and the party no . I considered the candidature of the workman while making selection for appointment of EDBPM of Mandesher Branch on regular basis along with others and as one Bangre was found to be eligible for such appointment in preference to the workman and others , he was appointed on permanent basis and therefore , the services of the workman was terminated . Hence there is no illegality in the termination of the services ofthe workman w. e.f. 08.02.1994 .
Onbehalf of the workman Mr. D. Mukherjee , Ld . Advocate;
Onbehalf of the employer : Mr. D.K. Verma , Ld. Advocate:
Moreover, in this case , the workman has failed to produce valid evidence in support of his claim and as such , the reference cannot be answered in his favour and he is not entitled to any relief. Hence , it is ordered :-
ORDER
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 7th Feb. 2012
ORDER
The action of the Post Master General , Nagpur Region , Maharashtra Circle , Shankar Nagar, Nagpur and the Sr. Suptd . of Post Offices , Nagpur MFL Division , Dhantoli , Nagpur in terminating the services of Shri Shalikram Pandurang Sawalakhe , a casual branch postmaster w.e.f. 08.02.1994, is legal, proper and justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L-20012/301 /2003 - IR ( C - I ) dt. 26.4.2004.
J.P. CHAND , Presiding Officer
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2012
"Whether the action of the management of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/ s CCL in recording date of birth of the concerned workman 4.3.48 in place of 23.7.56 as determined by the Medical Board is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? " .
का०आ० 1098.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) , की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सी० सी० एल० एवं प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण धनबाद नं०-2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या-53/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ एल -20012/301/2003-आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी० एस० एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी
2. The case of the sponsoring union as represented in the written statement is that workman Gopal Naik had beencontinuously working with unblemish record ofservice भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
2689
as sweeper since his treatment in the year 1981. At the time
of appointment, his age was recorded and determined as Bhurkunda Colliery, for the Management have been examined.
25 years on 23.7.1981 at his examination by the Company's
Medical Board as also accepted by the workman. But the Onthe consideration of the material documentary
management bytaking advantage ofhis illiteracy suddently and oral evidence of both the parties, I find the facts of
arbitrarily recorded and changed his date ofbirth as 4.3.1948 admission as under:
in place ofhis date of birth 23.7.1956 in his service excerpt
as per its order No. 4dt. 14.1.2005 without giving an (i) The workman has no birth certificate. He was
opportunity. The workman being illiterate could not detect appointed as Sweeper at Central Sounda Colliery in the
it, returned the service excerpt, and raised no objection to year 1981. While being appointed, he was medically
it, but as he knew of it, he seriously objected to it and examined by the Medical Board on 23.7.1981 holding his
represented to it, before the Management which went age as 25 years ( according to his own statement ) as per the
unconsidered. The failure of the conciliation procedure Report ofthe Initial Medical Examination ( Ext . W- 1 )
before the A.L.C. (C ), Ranchi due to adarnant attitude of
theManagement resulted in its reference for adjudication . (ii)HisForm B Register under Sl. No. 205 (Ext . M- 5)
The action of the Management as such was illegal and or made under his signature at the aforesaid colliery on the
unjustified, vindictive and against the principle of natural aforesaid date as contrasted with his plea of illiteracy; and
justice. The workman is working at the Mines Rescue (iii)He retired on 31.3.2008 .
Station, Naisarai after his transfer on March, 2004 .
3. Categorically denying the allegation of the 7.Mr. D. Mukherjee, the Ld. Advocate for the union/
Management it has been stated in the rejoinder by the workman referring to authority ( to be cited in brackets ) has
sponsoring union that industrial dispute is raisable ever submitted that Tribunal must confine its adjudication to
after retirement of an employee and the Union has locus points of dispute referred and matters incidental thereto
standi to do so. [Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. workman & other,
SCLJ (4) 2307 ) and that ' date of birth correction sought two
4. The contra pleaded case of the Management is years after retirement -Employee in support producing
that workman Gopal Nayak was appointed as sweeper on certificate issued by Register of Deaths & Births
28.7.1981 at Central Saunda Colliery where his date ofbirth Concurrents finding offact that date ofbirth as recorded in
as 4.3.1948 was recorded in his service sheet under his certificate is correct cannot be assested (Cenent Corp. of
thumb impression as his acceptance. His date of birth was India Ltd. Vs. Raghbir Singh 2002 AIR SCW 56 ( DB). The
determined by the Age Assessment Committee of Senior jurisdiction of the Tribunal for adjudication only in the
MedicalOfficer, Labour Welfare Officer, CollieryManager terms of the reference is an all acknowledged fact. But so
and Personal Officer before which he had also appeared. far as the question of date of birth is concerned in this
The 1.1.1976 was implemented in the year 1987 wherein the case, no workman could produce or prove his any certificate
workmenwere given a chance to file their objection ifany, about it issued by the Registrar of deaths and births , rather
to the existing entries. The Workman Gopal Nayak was
also supplied his service excerpt being his date of birth as he has put his Driving Licence, Pan Card and Unique I.D.
4.3.1948, but he did not raise any objection to it. His same Card(Ext . W.2, 3 and 6/1 respectively) as firm base for his
date ofbirth is recorded in the Form B Register, a statutory claimed date ofbirth as 23.7.1956. Since he is author ofhis
record maintained under the Mines Act . The entry made aforesaid documents having no authentic base , none would
therein as in his service sheet and service excerpt is final be legally admissible for his claim in the case , as he had
for all the purposes. But the workman never produced any admitted not to possess any birth certificate .
chitof paper as proof of his date of birth as 23.7.1956. So far as the emphatic plea of illiteracy is concerned,
Rather the Industrial Dispute has been raised by the itstands itself disproved by his applications dt. 14/6 (year
sponsoring union without locus standi after lapse of nil), and 19.7.1995 ( Ext. W- 7 series ) in English under his
23 years .He is not entitled to any relief.
Hindi full signature as well as by his L.T.C. application
5. The management categorically denying the dt. 29.12.1983 under his full English signature (Ext . M-4)
allegation of the workman pleaded in its rejoinder that the whichwas granted by the Colliery Manager concerned on
particulars of the workman have recorded in his service 12.1.1984. So his illiteracy plea is unsustainable .
sheet and Form-B under his thumb impression as his
acceptance in his presance . Thus the action of the 8. The contra contention of Mr. D.K. Verma , the Ld .
management in this regard is legal and justified. Counsel for the Management is that all the proved
Finding with Reasoning documents as maintained by the Management under the
Mines Act countenance to the admitted fact of the
6. In this case WWI Gopal Nayak, the workman for appointment ofthe workman on 23.7.1981 followed by his
the union , and MWI Prakash Sahay, Dy. Manager (Pers) initial medical examination on the same day, proving his date ofbirth as 4.3.1948 but not as 23.7.1956.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2690
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 53/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour- cum-Labour Court- 2 Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . CCL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012 .
[No. L-20013 /01 /2012 - IR (C - I )] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer 9.The statement of the workman (WWI ) that his age 25 years as determined by the Medical Board on 23.7.81 the date of his joining as per it medical report stands itself rebutted the report of his initial medical Examination (Ext . W.1 ), because the Report under Sl . No. 16 refers to his age was 25 years according to his own statement at that time. So itneeds critical evoluation of the materials available on the case record for proper adjudication.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT:
SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer.
Complaint under Sec . 33 A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Inthe matter of Reference No. 53 of 2004 If his age was 25 years at the time of joining/ appointment on 23.7.1981 , the substraction of 25 years against the year 1981 brings his date of birth as 23.7.1956 . But it stands disproved by his LTC applicationdt. 29.10.83 (Ext.M. 4) under his full signature in English which displays his age 35 years just after two years and five months of his joining as sweeper, so his age comes to 33 years on 23.7.1981. Thus by substracting his age 33 years against the date of his joining, his date of birth comes his birth year 1984. The addition of his 33 years to his 27 years services totals his superannuation age 60 years on his admitted date of retirement on 31.3.2008.
Complaint No. 1 of2007
ShriGopalNayak
Resident of Regional Computer Centre , Naisarai , Ramgarh , PO: Ramgarh , Distt : Ramgarh
Complainant
Jharkhand
V.s.
10. Whereas all the documents duly proved by MWI Prakash Sahay, the Dy. Manager (pers ) -the Service Excerpt , the Report ( assessment) of the Age Committee of the Sounda Colliery, the Service Sheet and the Form - 'B ' Register of the workman ( Ext . M.1 , 2 , 3 and 5 respectively ) as maintained by the Management under the provisions of the Mines Act evidently establish that his date of birth was4.3.1948 according to which his retirement on 31.3.2008 was undoubtedly quite commensurate with it.
1. General Manager ( B & S) , Barka - Sayal , of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/ s . CCLtd . PO: Sayal , Distt: Ramgarh
2. Project Officer of Bhurkunda Colliery ofM/ s . CCL , PO: Sayal
Opp. Parties
Distt: Ramgarh
APPEARANCES :
In view of the aforesaid findings , it is held in the terms of the reference that the action of C.C.L. , Burkunda CollieryManagement in treating 4.3.48 as determined by theMedical Board at the time of appointment of workman GopalNayak in place of 23.7.1956 as his birth date is quite proper andjustified . Hence, the workman is not entitled to anyrelief.
Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. K. Chakraborty, Ld . Advocate
Sd/- KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer
Onbehalf of the employer : Mr. D.K.Verma , Ld . Advocate:
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 7th Feb. 2012 का०आ० 1099.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) , की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी०सी०एल० एवं प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद न -2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/2004) को प्रकाशित करती हैजो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -20013 /01 /2012- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी०एस०एस० श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
2. Complaint u/s 33 A of the Industrial Dispute Act was filed on 23.10.2007 by the workman Gopal Nayak against the Project Officer of Bhurkunda Colliery with a prayer for withdrawal of the notice dt . 26.9.2007 related to the attempt ofthe opposition Parties to change his service condition as per the letterdt. 26.9.2007 of his termination , and for his reinstatement in his service withfull back wages and other benefits in the even of termination/ retirement w.e.f. 31.3.2008.
It is related to the Ref. No. 53/2004 in connection S:O . 1099.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central [भाग II---खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2691 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
ORDER
with the issue of the birth date of the complainant . Since the Ref. Case has been disposed of on 7.2.2012 while the complaint case was fixed for evidence of complainant on 29.4.2011 . Hence , it got infructious , and accordingly, it is ordered that proceeding with case is infructious now.
Sd/-
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe i.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/766/97 I.R. (C- I) dt . 18.1.1999 .
SCHEDULE
KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
"Whether the action of the managment of Basdeopur Colliery of M / s . BCCL in denial to provide employment to Smt . Rabia Khatoon , daughter- in- law of lateAbdul Hamid , Ex- Fitter in terms of para 9.4.2 . ofNCWA - IV is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief Smt . Rabia Khatoon , daughter- in- law of late Abdul Hamid is entitled?" .
का०आ० 1100.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) , की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी०सी०सी०एल० एवं प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद न०-2के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/1999) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-02-2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल -20012/ 766/1997- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी०एस०एस० श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी
2. Mr. N.G. Arun, Representative ofthe workman and Mr. D.K. Verma , Ld . Advocate for the managment are present but no witness for the evidence of the workman produced despite more than sufficient time for it .
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
Perusal of the case record reveals that the case has beenpending for the evidence of workman since 28.1.2005 but despite the best efforts of Mr. Arun as the Union Representative no witness produced for evidence on behalf ofthe petitioner Smt . Rabia Khatoon , daughter - in -law of late Abdul Hamid , Ex- Fitter in this case . It stands clear that the petitioner concerned has no interest to pursue he case for final adjudication .
S.O.. 1100. In pursuance of Section 17 of the industrial Disputes Act , 1947, ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33/1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court- 2 Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23/02/2012 .
[No. L -20012/766/ 1997 - IR( C- I ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer
Under these circumstances , proceeding with the case for uncertainity is quite futile and wastage of time . Hence, the case is closed , and accordingly order is passed .
ANNEXURE
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2012
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) , AT DHANBAD
PRESENT
SHRI KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947
का०आ० 1101.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) , की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी०सी ०सी० एल० एवं प्रबंधतंत्र के सबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , धनबाद न० 2 , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ ) संख्या 153/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23.02.2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Reference No. 33 of 1999 .
Parties:
[संख्या एल-20012/ 304/1999- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी० एस० एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी Employers in relation to the Management ofBasdeopur Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman .
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman Mr. N.G. Arun , Rep . of the workman.
Onbehalf ofthe employers : Mr. D.K. Verma , Ld . Advocate;
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
S.O. 1101. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 153/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court - 2, Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure , in the Industiral dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
Dated , Dhanbad , the 31st Jan. , 2012 .
[No. L-20012/304/ 1999- IR ( C - I ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer .
686 G1/ 2012-27 2692
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMNT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT
SHRI KISHORI RAM, PresidingOfficer.
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 )(d) ofthe l.D. Act , 1947
Reference No. 153 of 2001
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Barora Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf of the Employer : Mr. B.M. Prasad , Ld .
Advocate;
State : Jharkhand
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
Under these circumstances , proceeding with the case isfutile to carry the burden of it for uncertainity. Hence the case is closed and accordingly an order is passed as no dispute existing.
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer.
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
का ०आ० 1102.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बी०सी०सी०एल० एवं के प्रबंध तंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि किरण, धनबाद न० 2, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23.02.2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[संख्या एल -20012/78/2003 आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी० एस०एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी ।
NewDelhi , the 23rd February, 2012
Industry: Coal
Dated , Danbad , the 8th February, 2012 .
ORDER
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour , in excercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/304/99/1 - R (C- I) dt. 14.5.2001 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of Dalit Mazdoor Sangh from the management of Barora Area of M/ s . BCCL for regularisation of Sri Rameshwar Sahu as Auto Electric Helper Gr.'C' from 1983 and for promotion in Grade 'B' as per norms is legal and justified? If so , what relief the concerned workman entitled ? " .
2. None represented the Union/ workman Rameshwar Sahu nor any witness produced on behalf of Union/ workman for evidence . But Mr. B.M. Prasad , the learned Advocate for the Management is present .
Despite Regd. Noticesdt . 20.12.2010 and 2.8.2011 in addition to other Regd . Notices issued to the Secretary of the Dalit Mazdoor Sangh on its address as noted in the reference and even after giving last chance not a single witness for evidence of the workman has been produced in the case pending for its since 7.3.2006. The conduct of the workman implies that neither the Union nor the workman has any interest to contest the case which is related to an issue for the regularisation of the workman Rameshwar Sahu, as Auto Electrical Helper, Gr. C since 1983 .
S.O.. 1102.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 76/2003 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-2, Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure , in the Industiral dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
[No. L -20012/78/2003 - IR (C- I) ]
D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMNT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT
SHRI KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer .
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947
Reference No. 76 of 2003
Parties
: Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : None
Onbehalf ofthe Employer : Mr. D.K. Verma , Ld . Advocate;
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated, Danbad, the 8th February, 2012 .
ORDER
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in excercise of the powers conferred on them under Section [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2693 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
10(1 )( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/78/2003 /I- R( C- I) dt . 18.8.2003 .
SCHEDULE
S.O. 1103. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. 2/47/2005 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court- 2, Mumbai, as shown in the Annexure , in the Industiral dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mis. Indian Airlines Ltd. , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
[No. 1-11012/ 72/2003 - IR (C-I) ] D S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer "Whether the demand of Rashtriya Mazdoon Union from Govindpur Area No. III of M/s . BCCL that Sri Lakshmi Paswan , Shovel Operator should be promoted to excavation Grade - 'A' and to Spl . Gr.' A ' from appropriate time is proper and justified ? If so , to what reliefthe workman is entitled and from which date?".
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT
K.B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer.
Reference No. Cgit - 2 /47 of 2005
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF INDIANAIRLINES LTD.
(NOW: NATIONAL AVIATION CO. OF INDIA LTD. )
The Station Manager
2. None represented the Union concerned nor the workman Lakshmi Paswan present nor a fresh written statement filed on behalf of the Union as per order dt . 15.2.2011 of the Tribunai , despite three Regd. notices dt. 15.11.2010, Show Cause Notice 7.7.2011 and 22.11.2011 (boththe latter show cause) to the Secretary of the Union- Rastriya Mazdoor Union , Hirapur , Dhanbad , Mr.D.K. Verma , Ld. Advocate for the management is present and submits that as yet the sponsoring union has not filed written statement on behalf of the workman in compliance of the aforesaid order of the Tribunal , because earlier written statement was filed by Sri S.R. Choudhary, Adv. Dhanbad Civil Court which was not tenable in the eye of the Law.
IndianAirlines (Now: National Aviation Co. of india Ltd.) Dr.Ambedkar Road Pune 411002 .
AND
THEIR WORKMEN , Shri B. Hareshram Bajirao Lande Chawl Gulve Vasti , MIDC Area, Bhosari , Pune 411 026 .
Persued the case record , the present case which is the oldest one of the year 2003 relates to the issue as per theReference to the claim of the Union concerned for the promotion ofworkman Lakshmi Pawan , Shovel Operator , to Ex- cavation Gr. A and to Special Gr . A. The conduct of the Union as well as the workman shows their disinterestedness to persue the case . Hence, the case is closed and accordingly an order of no dispute is passed .
Shri D.R. Sarode ,
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer.
President Maharashtra Kamgar Union Sagar Colony, S - 12, Shastri Nagar Kothrood, Pune .
नई दिल्ली , 23 फरवरी , 2012
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. R.S. Pai , Advocate .
FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. 1.H. Sawant , Advocate .
Mumbai , dated the 1st February, 2012 .
AWARD
का०आ० 1103.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन एयरलाईन्स लिमिटेड एवं के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , मुम्बई न० 2 , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/47/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23.02.2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[संख्या एल-11012/72/2003- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] डी० एस० एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L- 11012/72/2003 - IR ( C -I) , dated 08.06.2004 ( received alongwith letter dated 19/01/2005 ) in excercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the 2694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the demand of Sh . B. Hareshram engaged for second ladder point checking by M/s . Indian Airlines through Distt. Commandant of Home Guards for his reinstatement w.e.f. 1.10.2002 with full back wages by M/s. Indian Airlines is justified ? If so , to what relief is the said Sh . Hareshram entitled ? "
The first party neither employed the second party nor paid him wages directly. The allegations to that effect are false . For security purpose , the duty of Home Guards kept on changing after every six months . They have denied all the allegations made in the statement of claim. They have denied that the workman has worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year to qualify himself as a workman . According to them , the second party is a Home Guard. He was deployed by Commandant , Pune on the request of first party. Therefore the second party was not employee of first party. He is not a workman . Neither has was employed nor terminated by first party. Therefore they submitted that the second party is not entitled to the relief of reinstatement, etc. Thus they pray that the reference be dismissed with cost.
2.After receipt of the reference , both parties were served with notices . In response to the notice , the second party workman has filed his statement of claim at Ex- 7. According to him , the first party employed him since 14/ 12/2000 for the work of security ladder point checking .His wage/ salary was Rs 2500/- . He was appointed directly. He has completed service for more than 240 days continuously. The first party has dominated the seniority of the second party workman and other workmen were given seniority over him . The workman worked faithfully. First party employed some other persons as regular employees who were relatives of the superior officer of the company. The employer has terminated the services of the second party orally w.e.f. 1.10.2002 without any notice or notice pay. No charge - sheet was also issued to him.. First party has not paid the legal dues . The action of termination of his services is totally illegal and improper . First party was engaged in unfair labour practice . They have victimized the second party workman. Second party lodged complaint before ALC (C) Pune . Management did not co- operate . Therefore ALC sent a failure report of the Government of India. The order oftermination is totally illegal . Therefore the workman prays for declaration that order of termination be declared illegal and improper. He also prays that the said order of termination be cancelled and direct first party to reinstate second party with full backwages and other consequential benefits.
4. The second party has denied the allegation in the written statement vide his rejoinder Ex - 13 . He repeated the same contents . In addition to that according to him he was interviewed by the management for the said post of Home Guard . He was given training in aviation security orientation by the management . His attendance was marked and supervised by the management . Work was allotted to him by the management . However management used to send the amount ofhis wages by cheque to Mr. V.R. Ekbote who was City Commandant of Home Guards , Shivaji Nagar Pune.He acted as a middle man and used to pay the wages at any rate ranging from Rs . 75/ - to Rs. 100/- per day. Management refused employment to the workman w.e.f. 1/10/2002 . He denied that he was employee of District Commandant of Home Guards , Pune . He only recommends or sponsors the candidate and management made arrangement to make payment through said Home Guard Organisation inorder to avoid its liability towards this workman. Therefore according to him he is entitled to relief of reinstatement with full backwages .
5.My Id. Predecessor has framed following issues for my determination. I record my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
Sr. no.
Issues
Findings
No.
(1) Whether second party establishes his relationship as an employees with first party?
No.
(ii) Is second party a workman?
(iii) IsDistrict Commandant of Home Guard necessary party? No.
No.
(iv) Whether second party worked more than 240 days in a calendar year to qualify as workman?
Issecond party entitled for any relief? No. (v)
(vi) Whatorder? Asper final
order.
3.The first party management resisted the statement ofclaim vide its written statement Ex- 8 . According to them, the referece is not maintainable as there is no employee- employer relations between the parties . The second party was engaged by District Commandant of Home Guards , Pune for the second ladder points checking . The second party is not a ' workman' as defined under Section 2 ( s ) of. the I.D. Act . The dispute raised is not an industrial dispute . The second party was engaged as a Home Guard by District Commandant , Home Guards . Hence question of termination of his services by first party does not arise . They denied that they have appointed the second party workman directly. The Station Mariager, Pune addressed a letter dt . 15/2/2000 to the District Commandant , Home Guards , Pune Requisitioning two males and one female home guards for each flight . Accordingly the District Commandant released the required Home Guards for secondary ladder points frisking . The first party used to issue cheque in the name of City Commandant , Home Guards , who used to pay wages to the Home Guards including the second party.
[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2695 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27, 1933
REASONS
Issues no . 1 & 2 :-
Guard as a party. It is not at all necessary to make him a party as neither he has any concern to the dispute nor any relief is sought against him . In this backdrop it needs no further discussion to hold that District Commandant is not a necessary party . Accordingly I decide this issue no . 3 in the negative .
Issue no . 4:-
6. Both these issues are interlinked . Therefore inorder to avoid repetition of discussion , they are discussed and decided simultaneously. The second party claims that he is a workman and he is employee of first party. As against this, it is the case of the first party that the workman is infact a Home Guard and the Home Guard Commandant , Pune deployed him on the request of the Manager of the first party. The services ofHome Guards are availed by the first party. Therefore according to first party, neither the second party is workman nor he is their employee . In this respect I would like to point out that both the parties have not produced any documentary evidence on record. The second party by way of examination- inchief has filed his affidavit at Ex . 17. However he did not make birnself available to undergo cross examination . Therefore averments in his affidavit cannot be read in evidence .
9. Theworkman claims that he has worked more than 240 days in a calendar year. Therefore he is entitled to get the benefit of permanency and he was entitled to be regularized in the services of first party. However neither hehas produced any evidence to shown that he was directly employed by the management nor he has led any evidence to show that he has worked more than 240 days in a calendar year continously. On the other hand from the facts and circumstances discussed in issues no . 1 & 2 above it is revealed that the workman was a Home Guard and as per requisition of first party the Home Guard Commandant had deployed his at the site of first party. It is a practice that, by requisition , airlines are availing the services of Police Personnel or the Home Guard . Such a person is the employees of Police Department or Home Guard as the case may be . He cannot claimbenefit of permanency or regularization of service in the airlines . In this backdrop I corne to the conclusion that the second party worker failed to prove that he has worked more than 240 days in a calendar year to qualify as a workman . Accordingly I decide this issue no. 4 in the negative .
Issues no . 5 & 6 :-
10. In the case at hand workman has failed to prove that he is workman within the meaning of definition of I.D. Acı as has been discussed in issues no . 1 & 2 above . In the same discussion it is also held that there was no relationship of employee employer between the second party with the firstparty. In the circumstances conclusion can be arrived atthat neither second party is entitled to the declaration sought for nor he is entitled for reinstatement with full back -wages as prayed for Accordingly I decide this issue no . 5 in the negative and proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
The reference stands dismissed with no order as to cost.
Dated: 01.02.2012
7. The version of the first party is supported by the averments in the rejoinder of the second party at Ex- 13 that Mr. V.R. Ekbote was City Commandant , Home Guards , Shivaji Nagar , Pune and he sent the workmen to the first party. The second party has also admitted in his rejoinder that he used to receive wages through Mr. Ekbote who was the Home Guard Commandant and the first party used to send the cheque to the Home Guard Commandant . In his affidavit at Ex - 17, the first party has contended that he was interviewed by the management for the said post ofHome Guard . It is a fact that there is no post of Home Guard as such in IndianAirlines Ltd. Therefore question of recruiting Home Guardby Indian Airlines does not arise . The Home Guards are recruited by the Home Guard Commandant and they are deployed at various points as per the requisitions . inshort the second party has not led any evidence that he was recruited by the first party. He has not produced any document in support of his version. He has not led any evidence documentary or otherwise . On the other hand from the admitted facts that the workman was sent to Indian Airlines by Home Guard Commandant and he was receiving wages from Home Guard Commandant indicates that second party was recruited as a Home Guard and as per the requisition he was deployed to do the second ladder point checking. It shows that neither he is workman ror employee of the first party. Thus I hold that there is no employee- employer relations between second party and the first party management . Accordingly I decide these issues nos . 1 & 2 in the negative.
issue no . 3 : -
K.B. Katake , Presiding Officer. नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2012
8. Inthis respect I would like to point out that second party has not claimed any relief against the District Cominandant of Home Guard . Further more it is also certinent to note that the reference can be decided effectively without making District Commandant ofHome
का०आ० 1104.-आद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार चसनल्ला कैलोरी एवं के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण, धनबाद न० 1 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2000 ) को प्रकाशित [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17 , 2012 /PHALGUNA 27, 1933
2696
करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23/02/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
ofthe complainant/ workman is that the action be taken against the opp . party/management for not complying the provision for re - assessment of date of birth by the Apex MedicalBoard as per I.I. 76 of JBCСІ .
[सं० एल -20013/02/2012- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी०एस०एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi the 23rd Feburary, 2012
S.O. 1104. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court - I , Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Chasnalla Colliery, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
[No. L-20013/02/2012 - IR(C - I) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I , DHANBAD
Inthematter ofa complaint U/ s . 33 -A of I.D. Act , 1947 .
In this respect the concerned complainant/workman produced himself as WW- 1 , who has stated in cross- examination that I had filed the complaint case also before Chief Judicial Magistrate regarding my date of birth and the number of the case was 655/2001 and it is correct that the said complaint petition was rejected , subsequent to which I had preferred a Revision Application before the District & Session Judge , Dhanbad against the said order whichwas registered as Criminal Revision No. 100/2001 . It is correct that finally that Revision Application stood dismissed, against which I moved before Hon'ble High Court by filing a Criminal Miscellaneous Application which is still pending over there . It shows that he filed complaint petition which was rejected. He also preferred Revision Application before District Judge which was also dismissed . He has filed Criminal Miscellancus Application before Hon'ble High Court which is still pending . So, in such circumstances , when the matter is pending before Hon'ble High Court no question arises to take any legal action against the opposite party / management by this court atthis stage.
Compaint No. 3 of 2000
(Arising out of Reference No. 162 of 1999)
Hence, the application/ complainant ofthe concerned complaint 'workman is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the comp'aint petition is dismissed.
Complainant
Chasnalla Mine Mazdoor
Union
VS.
Sd/- H.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
Employers in relation to Management of Chasnalla
: Opp . Party
Colliery
PRESENT:
SHRI H.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer
APPEARANCES :
का०आ० 1105.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार जैट एयरवेज (आई) लिमिटेड एवं के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, मुम्बई नं० 2 के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्याा 2/36/2003 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23/02/2012 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।
For the Complainant : Shri H.M. Singh , Advocate .
: Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate .
Forthe Opp . Party
[सं० एल -11012/22/ 2003- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी०एस०एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी
Industry: Coal .
State: Jharkhand .
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012 Dated , the 24.10.2011 .
AWARD
S.O. 1105. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/36/ 2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court - 2 , MUMBAI , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . JET Airways (1) Ltd. , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
AComplaint petition has been filed by the General Secretary, Chasnalla Mine Mazdoor Union , Under Sec . 33 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , praying for taking legal action against the opp . party/management for violation of sec. 33 ( 1 ) (a) of I.P. Act 1947 during pendency of industrial dispute for adjudication by the Tribunal, in Reference No. 162/99 .
[No. L- 11012/22 /2003 - IR(C- 1 ) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer 2.Inthis respect main argument advanced on behalf [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17, 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2697
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT: Κ.Β. ΚAΤAKE , Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO . CGIR -2/36 of 2003
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF JET AIRWAYS ( 1 ) LTD .
The Administrative Manager M/s. Jet Airways( 1) Ltd.
Chatrapati Shivaji International Airport Terminal- 1B Mumbai-400 099. AND
THEIR WORKMEN
TheGeneral Secretary NewAdarsh General Kamgar Union 18/8 , Acharya Nagar Chembur Mumbai -400 071 .
2.After receipt of the reference from the Ministry, both the parties were served with notices . They appeared through their legal representatives. The second party workman filed his statement of claim at Ex- 13 . According to him, he had joined the service of the first party since 29/10/1997 . He was confirmed in the service as Loader- cum-Cleaner w.e.f. 29/1/1999 in customer service department. The service record ofthe second party is clean and unblemished. On 18/8/2000 the first party has charge sheeted the second party workman and initiated inquiry against him. The charges were false and concocted. The inquiry conducted by the inquiry officer was unfair and without following the process of law. They dismiss the workman from their services . The said order of dismissal is illegal . The workman was present at the time of hearing by inquiry officer. However he was deliberately shown and maked as absent . The inquiry officer has not given proper opportunity to the second party workman to defend the charges . He had requested the inquiry officer to conduct the inquiry in Marathi . However the inquiry officer conducted the inquiry in English. The day to day inquiry proceeding was not explained by the inquiry officer to the workman. He was also not allowed to engage defence representative . The inquiry officer did not allow the workman to cross examine the witnesses of the management. The inquiry officer has prepared false inquiry report to show that fair opportunity was given to the workman .
* Shri Prashant P. Shetye , Chawl No. D/68 , Room No. 578, Pratiksha Nagar, Transit Camp Sion Koliwada Mumbai -400 022.
APPEARANCES:
Forthe Employer
: Mr. Abhay Kulkarni , Advocate
For the Workman
: Mr. Vinay V. Menon . Advocate.
Mumbai , dated the 9th January, 2012
AWARD PART- I
3. The second party workman has not committed anymisconduct . The charges leveled against him are false. Finding ofthe inquiry officer are perverse. The inquiry was not proper. The management has victimized the second party by making show of inquiry. They have illegally terminated services of the second party. Inquiry officer has falsely shown that management witnesses were cross examinedby the second party. Inquiry officer did not allow the second party to examine his witnesses. The first party has failed to prove the charges against the second party. The inquiry is unfair and improper and the findings of the inquiry officer are perverse. The management has illegally terminated the services of the workman . Therefore workman has raised industrial dispute before ALC ( C) . As the conciliation failed, ALC (C) sent a report to Ministry and Ministry sent the reference to this Tribunal for adjudication. Theworkmantherefore prays that inquiry be declared illegal and unfair. He also pray that findings of the inquiry officer be declared perverse. He further prays that the order of termination of his services be quashed and set aside and he be reinstated with full backwages .
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employmentby its Order No. L- 11012/22/2003- IR (C- I ) dated 27/06/2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of Jet Airways, Mumbai in dismissing the services ofMr. Prashant Prabhakar Shety, Loader- cum- Cleaner w.e.f. 7/3/2001 is legal and justified? Ifnot, towhat relief the workman is entitled? "
4.The first party management resisted the statement of claim of the second party vide their written statement Ex- 14. According to them, the reference is not maintainable in the eye of law. It is false and frivolous . The Union concerned has no locus - standi as the workman and others are not the members of the said union . The statement of claim is not signed by any office bearer of the union. The [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
2698
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
workman is not party to this reference . The union is the witnesses were offered for cross examination . He was
no more interested in this reference . The workman also called to lead his evidence . Proper procedure was
joined the services from 27/10/1997. His services were followed while conducting the inquiry. Principles of natural
terminated w.e.f. 7/3/2001 . During the small tenure ofservice justice were also followed while conducting the inquiry.
the service of the second party was not satisfactory. By a The charges were serious . Therefore the disciplinary
letterdt . 20/10/1999 he was given warning in writing for authority dismissed the workman from the services . The
habitual unauthorized absence . Inspite of that, again he order of disciplinary authority was duly served on the
remained absent from duty unauthorisedly for total 39days workman . The inquiry conducted by IO is fair and proper.
on 13 occasions during the period of January 2000 to March The findings of the IO are not perverse . Therefore the first
2000. Therefore he was chargesheeted by chargesheet party prays that the reference deserves to be dismissed.
dated 22/04/2002 for habitual absence . Departmental 6. Following are the preliminary issues framed by my
inquiry was conducted by an independent inquiry officer . 1.d. predecessor for my determination. I record my findings
The inquiry officer has conducted the inquiry. The thereon for the reasons to follow:
statements of the witnesses were recorded in presence of
Sr. No. Issues Findings
the workman . He compiled with the principles of natural
justice. Considering the material on record he found the 1. Is inquiry fair and proper ? No.
workman guilty of charges leveled against him and
submitted his report and findings . Instead of showing 2. Whether the findings are perverse ? Yes .
improvement the workman indulged in further misconduct REASONS
of assaulting his superior Mr. Amar Khurana , CSA and
threatening him with dire consequences . The workman Issue No. 1 :-
continued to threaten and abuse . When his colleagues 7. In respect of the inquiry proceedings the second
and superior attempted to dissuade the workman from party has contended that the inquiry officer has not
indulging into further misconduct the workman did not followed the procedure while conducting the inquiry.
pay any heed to the said attempt of his superiors and According to him he requested the inquiry officer to
colleagues . He admitted to have assaulted Mr. Khurana
and threatened him . He again threatened to assault him conduct the inquiry in Marathi. However the inquiry officer
conducted the inquiry in English . He further submitted
withbelt in case he interfered in the matter. The management thatsome witnesses were not allowed to be cross examined
received the compliant and report against the workman by the second party. According to him though he was
and chargesheet was issued against him . Further
present on some dates , inquiry officer has marked him
departmental inquiry was conducted strictly in compliance absent . As the inquiry was not conducted in Marathi , there
withprinciples of natural justice . Reasonable opportunity is violation ofprinciples of natural justice . He also submitted
was given to the workman to defend himself. The workman
admitted to have received the chargesheet and having that before filing his reply to the chargesheet, the
understood the charges leveled against him . Copies of all management has appointed the inquiry officer and initiated
the documents produced by the management were supplied the inquiry. Therefore according to him the inquiry is not
to the workman . All the management witnesses were offered fairandproper.
for cross examination . He was also given opportunity to 8. In respect of language of inquiry, there is pleading
examine himself and to lead his evidence. The inquiry officer in the statement of claim . WW- 1 , the workman has also
after considering the entire material on record found the contended in para 4 of his affidavit at Ex- 19 that he
workman guilty of the charges leveled against him and requested the inquiry officer to conduct the inquiry in
submitted his report and findings . The copy of the report Marathi but inquiry officer conducted the inquiry in English
and findings were supplied to the workman for his and he did not explain the procedure of inquiry to him . It is
comments . The management perused the inquiry report further contended that inquiry officer did not explain him
and comment ofthe workman and the findings of the inquiry the day to day proceeding of the inquiry in Marathi and
officer . The disciplinary authority did not find any made false remark in the inquiry proceeding . It is further
extraneous circumstance to show leniency to the workman contended in para 5 of his affidavit that he wanted to bring
as the charges were serious in nature and duly proved defence representative as most of the times inquiry officer
against the workman . Therefore disciplinary authority did not record the proceeding correctly and he could not
awarded the punishment of removal from service . lodge his protest against the sarne . He did not understand
5. The allegations in the staternent of claim are false the proceeding as it was in English . In para 6 of his affidavit
that the workman was not given opportunity to examine he contended that the inquiry officer did not allow him to
the witness . The allegations are also false that he was not cross examine the first witness Mr. Daulat B. Songarwala
allowed to cross examine the witnesses and that he was or any other witnesses . The other witnesses were also not
not allowed to lead his evidence . On the other hand cross examined by him . The inquiry officer himself framed
sufficient opportunity was given to the workman and ail the questions and recorded the answers in the inquiry
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2699
proceeding. The inquiry officer has falsely shown that opportunity was given to him . Infact no such opportunity was given to him to defend the charges.
अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, धनबाद नं -2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 36/2008] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23/02/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं० एल-20012/40/2008- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी०एस०एस० श्रीनिवास राव, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
S.O. 1106.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 36/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court- 2, Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/s . BCCL, and their workman , which wasreceivedby the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
[No. L-20012/40/2008 - IR(C -I )] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD.
PRESENT
SHRI KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act . , 1947
REFERENCE NO . 36 of 2008
PARTIES
: Employer in relation to the management of Bhagabandh Colliery of M/ s BCCL and their workman.
9. Inthe light of these allegations on record, the first party has not examined the inquiry officer to rebut the allegations in the statement of claim as well as in the affidavit ofthe workman. The inquiry officer was the proper person to explain the procedure he has adopted. He could have explained whether the charges were explained to the workman in Marathi and whether day to day proceeding was explained to him in Marathi . He was the witness who could have explained whether he had given opportunity to the workman to cross examine the prosecution witnesses . The first party did not examine the inquiry officer or any other witness to explain that the inquiry officer did not refuse the second party either to cross examine the witnesses or to examine his witnesses . In short, the first party failed to lead any evidence to show that the charges were explained to the workman in Marathi and he was allowed to cross examine the witnesses . The first party has not led any evidence to show that sufficient opportunity was given to the workman to defend himself and day to day proceeding was explained to him in Marathi . It amount to violation of principles of natural justice . In the circumstances it needs no further discussion or to cite any ruling to arrive me at the conclusion that there is no evidence on record to show that the inquiry was fair and proper . Naturally the findings of the inquiry officer also cannot be called fair and proper. Accordingly, I decide these issues no . 1 in the negative that the inquiry is not fair and proper and issue no . 2 in the affirmative that the findings of the inquiry officer are perverse . I would therefore like to direct the first party to lead their evidence against the second party on the charges framed against him . Thus the order:
APPEARANCES :
ORDER
Onbehalf of the workman : None
i. The inquiry is not fair and proper.
Onbehalfof the employer Mr. D.K. Verma, Ld .
Advocate;
ii. The findings of inquiry officer are found to perverse .
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
dated , Dhanbad, the 13th Feb. , 2012 .
ORDER
The first party management to lead their evidence against the second party workman in respect of the charges framed against him .
Parties to remain present on 10/04/2012 . iv.
V. No order as to cost .
Date09.01.2012
K.B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the l.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/40/08 - IR (CM - I ), dated 28.5.2008.
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
का०आ० 1106.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी० सी० सी० एल० एवं के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच,
"Whether the action of the management of Bhagabandh Colliery of M/ s BCCL in not regularising Sri Sukhu Manjhi , as Boiler Asstt./ Helper Cat. II is justified & legal?
686 GI / 2012-28 2700
(ii) To what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date? "
2.None represented the union/workman nor written statement has been filed till today on his behalf. Despite Regd. noticesdt . 28.1.2011 , 30.3.2011 25.8.2011 and Show Causedt. 20.12.2011 , Mr. D.K. Verma , the Ld . Advocate for the management is present . Perused the case record, it is evident that since the Reference on 23.7.2008 and thereafter since 30.3.2011 neither the union nor the workman Sukhu Manjhi appeared nor written statement filed on his behalf. The present reference relates to an issue about non- regularisation of workman Sukhu Manjhi as Boiler Asstt/ Helper Cat . II . The very conduct of the Union as well as the workman clearly implies their disinterestedness to persue the case.
In view of the aforesaid disinterestedness of the union in proceeding with the case, I find proceeding with the case for infinity is useless . Therefore , the case is closed and accordingly an order of ne dispute is passed .
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer,
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
का०आ० 1107.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इण्डियन एयरलाइंस लिमिटेड एवं के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, मुम्बई नं०-2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/29/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23/02/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं० एल -11012/62/2003- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] डी०एस० एस० श्रीनिवास राव , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2012
S.O. 1107. In pursuanceance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/29/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court- 2, MUMBAI, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 23/2/2012 .
[No. L- 11012/62/2003 - IR(C- I) ] D.S.S. SRINIVASA RAO , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT
K.B. KATAKE, Presiding Officer
[PART 11-
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2 /29 of 2004
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
INDIAN AIRLINES LTD .
(Now :: NATIONAL AVIATION CO . OF INDIA LTD. )
(Now: National Aviation Co. of India Ltd. ) The Managing Director Indian Airlines Ltd. Western Region New Engineering Complex Sahar
Mumbai - 400 099 .
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
701, 5 - B , Green Maidas
Akurli Road
Smt . R. Balaganga Lokhandwala Township Kandivli (E)
Mumbai 400 101 .
APPEARANCES :
FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. R.S. Pai , Advocate .
FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. J.H. Sawant , Advocate .
Mumbai , datedthe 1ª February, 2012 .
AWARD PART- II
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employmentby its Order No. L- 11012/ 62 /2003 - IR (C - I ) dated 06.07.2004 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"क्याइंडियन एयरलाइंस के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा कर्मकार श्रीमती आर० बालागंगा को दिनांक 06/06/2001 से उनकी बहाली के समय उनकी पूर्वसेवा मेंनिरंतरता न दिया जाना तथादिनांक 14/3/2000 से5/6/2000की अवधि के लिए वेतन अन्य लाभ न दिया जाना उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत की पात्रहै?"
2. The second party workman was serving with the first party. She was chargesheeted for accepting illegal gratification . Therefore the management appointed inquiry officer and initiated inquiry against the second party. The inquiry officer conducted the inquiry. He held the second party guilty of the charges and sent his report to the management . Management after perusing the report and the reply of the second party, terminated the services of the second party. The second party preferred appeal against the order ofmanagement . The Appellate Authority instead oftermination of services , directed the managementto re- [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2701 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
employ the second party workman afresh without considering her seniority and previous service .
serious misconduct were proved against her. Accordingly, I decide this issue no. 4 in the negative and proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
cost. The reference stands dismissed with no order as to
Date: 01.02.2012
K.B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2012
3. Feeling aggrieved, the second party raised industrial dispute and sought for continuation of her service since 14/03/2000 to 05/06/2001 . As the matter could not settle before ALC ( C) , on his report Labour Ministry sent the reference to this Tribunal . After perusing the statement ofclaim and written statement , my Id. Predecessor had framed issues at Ex - 14 . Issues nos . 1 , 2 & 3 were treated as preliminary issues . In Award Part - I , it was held that the inquiry was fair and proper and findings of the inquiry officer are not perverse and parties were directed to remain present to argue on the point of punishment.
4. Following are the remaining issues for my determination . I record my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
Sr. no. Issues
Findings
का०आ० 1108.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स मराठा सीमेन्टवर्क्स अंबुता सीमेन्ट मैसर्स आर के कन्सट्रक्स चन्द्रपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलय नागपुरके पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22/02/2012 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
4. Is second party entitled for the relief sought for?
No.
5. Whatorder?
[सं० एल -29011 /40/2006-आई आर ( एम ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव
Asper final order.
New Delhi , the 23rd Feburary, 2012
REASONS
Issue no . 4:-
S.O. 1108. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ..; of the Central ... 76/2006 .... Governmen! Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industriai Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Maratha Cemen: Works , Ambuja Cement M/s RK Construction (Chandrapur) and their workınan , which was receivedby the Central Government on 22/2/2012.
[No. L- 29011 /40/2006- IR(M) ] JOHAN TOPNO, Under Secretary
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CGIT-CUM -LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No. CGIT /NGP/ 76/2006
Date: 25.01.2012 .
:
PartyNo.1(a)
M/ s. Maratha Cement Works ,
Ambuja Cement , At Post Upparwahi ,
Taluka Korpana, Chandrapur ( MS )
(b):
M/ s. R.K.. Construction Contractor, M/ s. Maratha Cement Works , F - 10 , Building no . 1 , AT & PO : Upparwahi , Tah: Korpana , Distt . Chandrapur (MS)
5. In the case at hand , the fact is not disputed that the second party workman was re -employed in the service as per the order ofAppellate Authority. The second party has claimed only for continuation of her service for the period from 14/03/2000 to 05/06/2001 . She has also claimed wages and allowances and other consequential benefits as if no removal order was ever passed. In this respect the id . Advocate for the first party rightly submitted that the charges of accepting illegal gratification were proved against the second party, which amount to serious misconduct . Even punishment of termination of her services wasjustified. He further submitted that as per the order of appellate authority, management has re - employed her. He further submitted that the workmar. sustained a loss of seniority of only one year. Looking into the nature of serious misconduct proved against the second party of the nature of serious misconduct proved against the second party of accepting illegal gratification , I also hold that the second party was liable for some heavy punishment . On the other hand as per the direction of appellate authority though the second party was guilty for misconduct , she was re- employed and allowed to join the services afresh . Break of about fifteen months in the service cannot be called shockingly disproportionate punishment . Thus I hold that punishment is proportionate to the proved misconduct of the second party. In this backdrop , I hold that the second party is not entitled to the relief sought for as charges of
Versus [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
: Shri Vinod Madhukar Mukke
PartyNo. 2
R/ o . Lakhmapur , AT & PO
Gadehandur,
Tah . Rajura, Chandrapur (MS )
AWARD
taking all and final payment and before termination of his services , the mandatory provisions of section 25 of the Actand provision of the standing orders were not complied with and though he made representations for his reinstatement , the same did not evoke any response . The workman has prayed for his reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .
(Dated: 25th January, 2012)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 ( A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) ( " the Act " in short ) , the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of Maratha Cements Works and Shri Vinod Madhukar Mukke , for adjudication , as per letter No.L- 29011 / 40/2006 - IR ( M) dated 28.09.2006 , with the following schedule: --
"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Maratha Cement Works , At Post Upparwahi, Distt. Chandrapur in terminating the services of Shri Vinod Madhukar Mukke verbally through the contractor is justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
2. On receipt of the reference , the parties were nothing to file their respective statement ofclaim and written statement and accordingly, the workman , Shri Vinod Mukke , ("the workman " in short ) filed his statement of claim and the management of the Maratha Cement ( " Party No. 1 " in short) filed its written statement .
The case of the workman as projected in the statement of claim is that he had passed class VIth and his ancestral land was acquired by M/s. Ambuja Cement for its factory, in 2001 and the party no . 1 ( a) held discussions with residents of 12 villages , affected by the project on providing employment and he came to be appointed orally as agarderner mazdoor in horticultural branch by party no. 1( a) and he was being paid Rs . 57.80 per day since 2002,
3. The party no. 1 (a) has resisted the claim of the workman by filing its written statement and pleading inter- alia that the workman is guilty of suppression of material facts and has not approached with clean hands and the statement of claim is not in terms of the dispute referred to the Tribunal and therefore , the reference is to be answered in negative and though the workman has admitted his employment with party no . 1 (b) , in the entire text of the statement ofclaim and also in the prayer clauses has prayed for reliefs only against it (party no . 1 (a) ) and as such, no relief can be granted in his favour . It is the further case of party no. 1(a) that the workman was employed by party no. 1(b) and at no point of time, he was in its roll and as such, the question of termination of his services by it doesn't arise at all and there was no relationship of employer and employee between it and the workman at any point of time and it has and had never terminated the services of the workman through the contractor , party no. 1 (b) and the workman has deliberately and with oblique motive has impleded it as a party in the proceeding . The further case ofthe party no . 1 (a) is that the land of the workman was not acquired in 2001 and 2.55 hr of land under survey no. 262 of village Thutra ofthe land owner, Shri Krishna Rama Bhojekar was acquired by its special land acquisition officer and compensation of a sum of Rs . 2,81,833 / - and resettlement grant of Rs . 1,77,500/- was paid to the land owner and it had never any discussion with residents of 12 villages and there was an agreement between it and the State Government on 13.08.1999 , to give preference to the affected land owners in providing employment opportunities in grade 3 and4 and relaxation in the eligibility criteria basing onthe merits of individual case and the workman was never appointed orally as gardner in its horticulture branch and it isnot aware about the wages paid to the workman by the contractors or about the period of his service under the contractor and the workman has made false allegations against it (party no . 1 (a) ) of implicating him in false case of theft and harassing him and the workman is not entitled for any relief. It is also pleaded by party no . 1(a) that when the workman was working under R.K. Construction , on 30.09.2004, he was involved in the act of illegally taking petrol from motorcycle MH - 34 - R- 3864 , parked at L Type guest house and on 01.04.2004, when the incidence was enquired intoby its Assistant Security officer , the workman gave his confessional statement in writing admitting siphoning of petrol from the vehicles unauthorisedly on many occasion and filling up the same in his own two wheeler and the confessional statement was handed over through the party no. 1(b) and during his service, he was put on the roll of M/s . Prasad constructions and party no . 1 (b) according to the sweet will of the party no . 1( a) and he was illegally terminated from service by party no . 1 (a) on false charge of committing theft from the premises of the company only, to wriggle out of its commitment to provide employment to project affected persons and the party no . 1(a) made a false case against him and started harassing him and eventually orally terminated his service in September, 2004 and the party no . 1 (a) neither conducted any enquiry nor served any charge sheet on him , before termination of his services and termination of his services isillegal . It is further pleaded by the workman that an officer ofthe party no . 1( a) obtained his signatures on blank papers and the said papers were misused to show that he was stealing petrol from a motorcycle and he confessed the misconduct and the party no. 1 (a) further claimed that he being ashamed of his act, did not turn up for duty, after to his employer, the party no.1 (b) through regular process [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 17 , 2012/फाल्गुन 27 , 1933
2703
New Delhi , the 5th March, 2012
for further action and it is not aware about the action taken by party no . 1 (b) against the workman.
4. It isnecessary to mention here that after filing his affidavit on 24.10.2008 , the workman did not appear in the case to contest. As the workman did not appear for his cross-examination, his evidence on affidavit was expunged, as per orders dated 12.04.2011 . Subsequently, the party no. 1(a) also did not appear in the case and therefore, the case was closed and posted for award.
S.O.: 1109.- Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so requires that in pursuance of the provisions of sub -clause (vi) of the clause ( n) of section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour and Employment , dated 09.09.2011 the service in the Any Oil Fieldwhich is covered by item 17 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a Public Utility Service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period ofsixmonths from the 9th September, 2011 .
Andwhereas , the Central Government is of opinion thatpublic interest requires the extension ofthe said period by a further period of six months.
5. It is well settled that when a workman raises a dispute challenging the validity of the termination of the service, it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the workman fails to appear or to file written statement or to produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in favour and he could not be entitled to any relief.
In this case in hand, the workman has failed to produce any evidence in support of his claim and as such, the reference cannot be answered in his favour and he is not entitled to any relief. Hence , it is ordered:--
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub - clause (vi) of clause (n) of section 2 oftheIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a Public Utility Service for the purposes of the said Act , for a period of six months from the 9th March, 2012 .
ORDER
[No. S- 11017/10/97 - IR (PL)]
CHANDRA PRAKASH, Jt . Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2012
The action of the management of M/ s . Maratha Cement Works , At Post Upparwahi , Distt. Chandrapur in terminating the services of Shri Vinod Madhukar Mukke verbally through the contractor is justified . The workman is not entitled to any relief.
J. P. CHAND, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2012
का०आ० 1110.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल, 2012 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध् याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध् याय-5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77, 78, 79, और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबंध हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्ः
क्रमांक राजस्व भाग
हदबस्त तहसील जिला
संख्या
काआ० 1109.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर किलोकहित मेंऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के उपबंधों के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का आ० दिनांक 09.09.2011 द्वारा किसी भी तेल क्षेत्र जो कि औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 17 में शामिल है को उक्तअधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 09.09.2011 से छः मास कीकालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;
1 अलीपुर खालसा 36 घरोंदा
करनाल
2
325
महमूदपुर
चचरौली
यमुनानगर और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की ओर कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है;
3
302
शाहपुर
विलासपुर यमुनानगर
4
144
दौलतपुर
जगाधरी
यमुनानगर
5
487
रतनगढ़
जगाधरी
यमुनानगर
6
नौल्था
अतः, अब, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 09.03.2012 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।
38
इसराना पानीपत
[सं० एस-11017/10/97- आईआर ( पी॰एल॰) ]
[सं० एस-38013/07/2012 - एस० एस० 1 ]
चन्द्र प्रकाश, सयुंक्त सचिव
नरेश जायसवाल , अवर सचिव [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 17, 2012/PHALGUNA 27 , 1933
2704
New Delhi , the 5th March, 2012
याय-5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79, और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबंध छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्ः
" जिला रायपुर, तहसील तिल्दा में राजस्व ग्राम तिल्दा , बैकुंठ, तण्डवा , बहेसर, केन्द्र, नेवरा तथा जिला वलौदा बाजार, तहसील वलौदा बाजार में राजस्व ग्राम वलौदा बाजार, रावन , सोनाडीह के अर्न्तगत आने वाले क्षेत्र । "
[रूं एस-38013/08/2012 - ए०ए० 1 ] नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव S.O. 1110. In exercise of the powers conferrsed by sub - section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2012 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V andVI (except sub - section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely:-
Sl.No. Revenue Village Had Bast No. Tehsil District
New Delhi , the 5th March , 2012
Gharonda Karnal
1. Alipur Khalsa 36
2.
325 Chachrauli Yamunagar
Mahmoodpur
302
3.
Bilaspur Yamunagar
Shahpur
144
4.
Jagadhri Yamunagar
Daulatpur
487
5.
Jagadhri Yamunagar
Rattangarh
38
Noltha
6.
Israna Panipat
S.O.: 1111. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April , 2012 as the date on which theprovisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter Vand VI (except sub- section (i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Chhattisgarh namely:-
[No. S- 38013/07/2012 -SS.I ] NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2012
"Revenue Villages of Tilda , Baikunth , Tandwa , Bahesar, Kendru , Nevara in Tehsil Tilda , District Raipurand
Revenue Villages of Baloda Bazar, Ravan , Sonadih in Tehsil Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar. "
[No. S-38013 /08 /2012-SS.I ] NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
का०आ० 1111.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 अप्रैल, 2012 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध् याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्
Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press, Ring Road , Mayapuri . New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.