रजिस्ट्रीसं. डी. एल . ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD . NO . D. L. (N ) 04/0007/2003--05
भारतका राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 9]
नई दिल्ली, फरवरी 24 मार्च 2 , 2013 , शनिवार/फाल्गुन 5-फाल्गुन 11 , 1934 NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 24-MARCH 2, 2013, SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 5-PHALGUNA 11 , 1934 No. 9]
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड (ii)
PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 496. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम , 1955 (1955 का23 ) की धारा 19 के खण्ड (च) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , डॉ. उर्जित आर. पटेल , डिप्टी गवर्नर , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेशों तक , डॉ. सुबिर विठल गोकर्न के स्थान पर भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के केन्द्रीय निदेशक मंडल में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 2/2/2011 - बीओ-1 ] श्रेया गुहा , निदेशक
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 6th February, 2013 S. O. 496. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (f) of Section 19 of the State Bank of India Act , 1955 (23 of 1955) , the Central Government hereby nomi- nates Dr. Urjit R.Patel , Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India, to be a Director on the Central Board of Directors of State Bank of India with immediate effect and until further orders vice Dr.Subir Vithal Gokarn .
[F.No. 2/2/2011 -BO- 1 ] SREYA GUHA , Director (राजस्व विभाग)
(कार्यालय मुख्य आयुक्त
केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, सीमा शुल्क एवं सेवाकर , भोपाल जोन )
भोपाल , 8 फरवरी , 2013
सं. 01/2013-सीमा-शुल्क ( एन.टी. )
का. आ. 497. सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा . 152 के अन्तर्गत राजस्व विभाग , वित्त मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार द्वारा जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94-सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. ) दिनांक 17 94 के अन्तर्गत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं , ए. के. पवार , मुख्य आयुक्त, केन्द्रीय उत्पाद , सीमा शुल्क एवं सेवाकर , भोपाल क्षेत्र, भोपाल एतद्वारा खसरा नं. 15 एवं 16 ग्राम शिवपुरा , तहसील- रघुराज नगर , जिला सतना , राज्य मध्य प्रदेश की भूमि को सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम 1962 की धारा 9 के अन्तर्गत सीमा- शुल्क निजी बंधित भंडारगृह हेतु वेयरहाउसिंग स्टेशन घोषित करता हूँ ।
[फा. सं. IV( 16 ) 28 तक./सीसीओ/बीजैड/2012] ए. के. पवार , मुख्य आयुक्त , केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क
(1543)
651G1/2013 1544
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
(Department ofRevenue)
New Delhi , the 18th February, 2013 (OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, BHOPAL ZONE)
Bhopal , the 8th February, 2013 No. 01/2013 - Cus . (NT)
S. O. 499. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section 3 (h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub - clause ( 1 ) ofclause 3 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Pro- visions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government , hereby nominates Shri Dinesh Dubey( DoB : 27-09-1954), as part- time Non - official Director on the Board of Direc- tors of Allahabad Bank, for a period of three years , from the date ofnotification of his appointment or until further orders,whichever is earlier.
[ F.No. 6/ 19/2011 -BO- 1 ]
VIJAY MALHOTRA , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2013
S. O. 497. In exercise of the powers conferred by Notification No. 33/94-Customs (NT) dated 01-07-1994 of theGovernment of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department ofRevenue, New Delhi , as amended, issued under Section 152of the Customs Act, 1962, I, A.K. Pawar, ChiefCom- missioner , Customs , Central Excise & Service Tax, Bhopal Zone , Bhopal hereby declare Khasra Nos . 15 & 16 of Village-Shivpura , Tehsil - Raghuraj Nagar, Distt. Satna in the state of Madhya Pradesh as warehousing station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 for the Limited purpose of Private Customs Bonded Warehouse .
[ F.No. IV( 16)28-Tech./CCO/BZ/2012 ] A. K. PAWAR, Chief Commissioner , Customs & Central Excise (विनिवेश विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 500.-वित्तीय आस्तियों का प्रतिभूतिकरण एवं पुनर्गठन और प्रतिभूति हित का प्रवर्तन अधिनियम , 2002 की धारा 21 की उपधारा ( i ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा , श्री आर.वी. वर्मा, अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक , राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक ( एनएचबी ) के रजिस्ट्रार तथा प्रबंध निदेशक एवं मुख्यकार्यकारी अधिकारी ( केन्द्रीय रजिस्ट्रार ) , भारतीय केन्द्रीय आस्ति प्रतिभूतिकरण पुनर्गठन और प्रतिभूति हित रजिस्ट्री ( सीईआरएसएआई ) के रूप में उनके कार्यकाल को अगले तीन माह के लिए अर्थात् 01-01-2013 से 31-03-2013 तक या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो , बढ़ाती है ।
का. आ. 498, केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में, विनिवेश विभाग को, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 33/3/2013 - हिन्दी] आलोक टंडन , संयुक्त सचिव
2. श्री आर. वी. वर्मा, राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में अपने कर्तव्यों के अतिरिक्त केन्द्रीय रजिस्ट्रार का कार्यभार भी संभालेंगे ।
(Department of Disinvestment)
New Delhi , the 15th February, 2013
[फा.सं. 56/5/2007- बीओ- II (रिकवरी ) ] मिहिर कुमार , निदेशक (रिकवरी )
New Delhi , the 18th February, 2013 S.O. 498. In pursuance of Sub- Rule (4) ofRule 10 ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby noti- fies the Department of Disinvestment where 80 % staff has acquired working knowledge ofHindi.
[F. No. 33/3/2013-Hindi ] ALOK TONDON , Jt . Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2013
S. O. 500.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( i ) of Section 21 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the Central Government hereby extends the tenure of Shri R.V. Verma , Chairman and Managing Director, National Housing Bank (NHB ) , as the Registrar and Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer ( Central Registrar ) , Central Registry of Securitization Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India ( CERSAI ) for a further period of three months with effect from 01-01-2013 till 31-03-2013 or until further orders , whichever is earlier.
का. आ. 499. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 ( ज ) एवं ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्री दिनेश दुबे (जन्म तिथि 27-09-1954) को उनकी नियुक्तिकी अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो , इलाहाबाद बैंक के बोर्ड में अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।
2. Shri R.V. Verma shall hold the charge of Central Registrar in addition to his duties as Chairman and Managing Director, National Housing Bank (NHB).
[फा. सं. 6/ 19/2011 - बीओ -1 ] विजय मल्होत्रा , अवर सचिव
[F.No. 56/5/2007 -BO- II ( Recovery) ; MIHIR KUMAR, Director ( Recovery) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1545
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 501. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम , 1955 ( 1955 का 23 ) की धारा 21 क के साथ पठित धारा 21 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करके, एतद्वारा , श्री फिलिप मैथ्यू ( जन्म तिथि: 26-5-1949 ) को उनकी नियुक्तिकी अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के तिरूवनंतपुरम स्थानीय बोर्ड में सदस्य के रूप में नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 3 /56/2012- बीओ -1 ] विजय मल्होत्रा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 19th February, 2013
S. O. 501. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 21 , read with section 21A of The State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955 ) , the Central Government , in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri Philip Mathew ( DoB : 26-5-1949 ) , as a member of the Thiruvananthapuram Local Board of State Bank of India , for a period ofthree years , from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is ear- lier.
[F. No. 3/56/2012-BO- I ]
VIJAY MALHOTRA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 502. भारतीय निर्यात- आयात बैंक अधिनियम, 1981 ( 1981 का 28 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ङ) के उप -खंड ( ii ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक श्री एस.एस. मुन्द्रा को अगले आदेशों तक या अधिवर्षिता की आयु प्राप्त कर लेने तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय निर्यात - आयात बैंक ( एक्जिम बैंक ) के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्तकरती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/16/2012- आईएफ -1 ] एस. गोपाल कृष्ण, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2013
S. O. 502. In pursuance of Sub- Clause ( ii ) of Clause (e) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Export Import Bank of India Act, 1981 ( 28 of 1981 ), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri S.S. Mundra, Chairman and Managing Director, Bank of Baroda, as part - time non- official Director on the Board of Directors of Export Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) till further orders , or on attaining age of superannuation , whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 9/ 16/2012 - IF- I ]
S. GOPAL KRISHNA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 503. भारतीय निर्यात- आयात बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 ( 1981 का 28 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ङ ) के उप -खंड ( ii ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा , बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक श्रीमती वी.आर. अय्यर को अगले आदेशों तक या अधिवर्षिता की आयु प्राप्त कर लेने तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय निर्यात- आयात बैंक ( एक्जिम बैंक ) के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/ 16/2012- आईएफ -1 ]
एस. गोपाल कृष्ण , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2013
S. O. 503. In pursuance of Sub -Clause ( ii ) of Clause ( e) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Export Import Bank of India Act, 1981 ( 28 of 1981 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Smt V.R. Iyer, Chairman and Managing Director , Bank of India , as part-time non- official Director on the Board of Directors of Export Import Bank of India (Exim Bank ) till further orders , or on attaining age of superannuation , whichever is earlier.
[F.No. 9/16/2012 - IF - I ]
S. GOPAL KRISHNA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 504.-भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम , 1955 ( 1955 का 23 ) की धारा 21 क के साथ पठित धारा 21 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करके , एतद्द्वारा , श्री संजय मंडल ( जन्म तिथिः 10-12-1973 ) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधि सूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के पटना स्थानीय बोर्ड में सदस्य के रूप में नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 3/51/2012- बीओ -1 ] विजय मल्होत्रा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 21st February, 2013
S. O. 504. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 21 , read with Section 21 A of The State Bank of India Act , 1955 (23 of 1955 ) , the Central Government , in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri Sanjay Mandal (DoB: 10-12-1973 ) , as a member ofthe Patna Local Board of State Bank of India, for a period of three years , from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 3 /51/2012 -BO- I ]
VIJAY MALHOTRA , Under Secy.
1546
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]
संचार एवं सूचना प्रोद्योगिकी मंत्रालय
(डाक विभाग)
नई दिल्ली , 19 फरवरी , 2013
(4 ) के अनुसरण में , मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय ( स्कूल शिक्षा एवं साक्षरता विभाग ) के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित केंद्रीय विद्यालयों को ऐसे कार्यालय के रूप में , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारी- वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है:-
क्र.सं. विद्यालय का नाम तथा पता
1. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , झाबुआ गैल टाउनशिप , झाबुआ ( म. प्र. )
2. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , बड़वानी (म. प्र. ) -451551
3. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , बुरहानपुर , रायपुरा . खंडवा रोड, बुरहानपुर (म. प्र.)
का. आ. 505.-राजभाषा नियम ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रसरकार, डाक विभाग के अधीनस्थ कार्यालय मुख्य पोस्ट- मास्टर जनरल , हिमाचल प्रदेश परिमंडल , शिमला-171009 के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :-
4. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , टीकमगढ़ परिसर नगर पालिका परिषद् टीकमगढ़ (म. प्र. ) -472001
1. कार्यालय सहायक अधीक्षक डाक घर पश्चिम उपमंडल , शिमला-171003
5. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , हरदा जिल्ला पंचायत के सामने, जिला- हरदा (म. प्र.) -461331
2. कार्यालय निरीक्षक डाक घर पूर्व उपमंडल , शिमला-171004
3. कार्यालय निरीक्षक डाक घर ठियोग उपमंडल, ठियोग -171201 6. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , रायसेन डाईट कैम्पस, सागर रोड , रायसेन - 464551
4. कार्यालय निरीक्षक डाक घर रोहडू उपमंडल , रोहडू-171207
5. उप डाक घर शिमला हाई कोर्ट , शिमला -171001
7. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , अम्बाह रोड , पो . जिगनी , मुरैना (म.प्र. )-467001
केंद्रीय विद्यालय . ऐटा आई.टी.आई. परिसर , एंटा (उ.प्र.) -207001 8.
[फा. सं. 11017-1/2011 - रा.भा. ] मीरा हांडा, उप महानिदेशक ( फिलैटली/रा.भा. )
केंद्रीय विद्यालय , डाईट कैम्पस, इटावा -206001 9.
10. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , ( महामाया नगर) तालाब चौराहा , पुराना कलेक्टर भवन , हाथरस -204101
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Department of Posts)
New Delhi , the 19th February, 2013
11. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , हासीमारा डाकघर हासीमारा , जिला जलपाईगुडी , पश्चिम बंगाल-735215
12. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , तामुलपुर , डाकघर तामुलपुर बक्श (बी.टी.ए.डी. ) , आसाम 781367
13. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , पानबाडो , डाक घर आलमगंज , जिला ध बड़ी, आसाम-783339
S. O. 505.-In pursuance of Rule 10(4) ofthe Offi- cial Language (use for official purposes of the Union ) Rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies following offices of the Office of the Chief Postmaster General , Himachal Pradesh Circle , Shimla- 171009 ofthe Department ofPosts where 80% staff has acquired the working knowl- edge of Hindi:-
14. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , नेपा , डाक घर उमसाव बड़ापानी रिभोई, मेघालय -793123
1 . O/o ASPO, Western Sub Division , Shimla- 171003
2. O/ o Inspector PO , Eastern Sub Division , Shimla- 171004
15. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , गांधीनगर डाक घर के. के. बारी जिला- कुच बिहार , पश्चिम बंगाल-736179
3. O/o Inspector PO, Thiog Sub Divsion , Thiog- 171201 16. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , बिन्नागुडी छावनी , जिला जलपाईगुडी- 735232
4. O/ o Inspector PO , Rohdu Sub Division , Rohdu- 171207
17. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , रानीनगर , डाकघर - पातकाटा , जिला- जलपाईगुडी, पश्चिम बंगाल -735133
5. Sub PO, High Court , Shimla - 171001 [F. No. 11017-1 /2011 -OL] 18. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , नारंगी , डाकघर सातगांव गुवाहाटी आसाम-781027
MEERA HANDA , Dy. Director General ( Philately/OL)
मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय
19. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , न्यूबंगाईगांव , आसाम-783381
(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) ( राजभाषा यूनिट )
20. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , अपर शिलांग डाकघर- नोंगलियर जिला - पू. खासी हिल्स, मेघालय-793009
नई दिल्ली , 13 फरवरी , 2013
21. केंद्रीय विद्यालय, बोरझर डाकघर अजारा , गुवाहाटी-7810017
का. आ. 506. केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम
केंद्रीय विद्यालय , दीव सरकारी माध्यमिक विद्यालय परिसर फुदम-दीव-36250 22.
1547
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
11. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Hasimara, P.P. Hasimara , Distt. Jalpaiguri , West Bengal- 735215 23. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , दरजीपुरा वायुसेना स्थल , दरजीपुरा , बडोदरा- 390022
12. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Tamulpur, P.o. Tamulpur, Distt. Baksa (BTAD) Assam- 781367 24. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , दाहोद फ्रीलेण्ड गंज , पारसी कॉलोनी के पास, दाहोद-389160
13. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Panbari , 22BN BSF Campus, P.O. Alomganj , Distt. Dhubari (Assam )-783339 25. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , सं. प्र.के.सी.सु.ब.ता. चाकूर , जिला लातुर- 413513
14. Kendriya Vidyalaya, NEPA , PO Umsav Rebhoe , Meghalaya- 793123
26. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , द.म.रे. नांदेड मंडल रेल कार्यालय परिसर, एयरपोर्ट रोड, नांदेड- 431602
15. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Gandhinagar , Gopalpur, PO K.K. Bari Distt. Cooch Behar (WB)-736179
16. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Binaguri No. 2, Binaguri Canntt . Distt. Jalpaiguri - 735232
17. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Raninagar, PO Patkata, Distt . Jalpaiguri (W.B. ) -735133
27. केंद्रीय विद्यालय , केंद्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल तलेगांव ( दाभाडे) , तलेगांव पुणे -410507 ( महाराष्ट्र) [फा.सं. 11011-1/2013 - रा.भा.ए. ] अनन्त कुमार सिंह , संयुक्त सचिव
18. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Narangi , PO - Satgaon , Guwahati Assam - 781027
19. Kendriya Vidyalaya, New Bongaigaon , PO New Bongaigaon, Assam- 783381
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOP- MENT (Department of Higher Education) (O.L. UNIT) New Delhi , the 13th February, 2013
20. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Upper Shilling, PO Nonglyer, Distt. East Khasi Hills , Meghalaya- 793009
21 . Kendriya Vidyalaya, Borjha PO Azara, Guwahati- 781017
22. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Diu , Govt . High School Campus, Fudam -Diu-36250
23. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Darjipura , Air Force Station, Darjipura, Vadodara-390022
24.
S. O. 506. In pursuanceuance of the Rule (4) of rule 10 ofthe Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby noti- fies the following Kendriya Vidyalayas under the Ministry ofHuman Resource Development, ( Deptt . of School Edu- cation & Literary) as office , whose more than 80% mem- bers of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:
Kendriya Vidyalaya, Dahod , Free Land Ganj , Near Parsi Colony, Dahod-389160
Sl. No. Name and address of the School
25.
1.
Kendriya Vidyalaya, STC BSE Chakuar , TQ- Chakru , Distt . Latur-413513
Kendriya Vidyalaya , Jhabua Gali Township , Jhabua (MP)
26.
2. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Baruwani (MP)-451551
Kendriya Vidyalaya , SCR Nanded Divisional Railway Office Campus Airport Road Nanded- 431602
3. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Burhanpur, Rajpura Khandwa Road, Burhanpur (MP)
4. Kendriya Vidyalaya , Tikamgarh , Premises of Municipality Council Tikamgarh ( MP)-472001
5. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Harda, Near Distt. Panchayat Office, Harda (MP)-461331
27. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Central Reserve Police Force Talegaon ( Dabhade) , Talegaon Pune - 410507 (Maharashtra) [F. No. 11011-1/2013-O.L.U] ANANT KUMAR SINGH , Jt . Secy. नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी, 2013
6. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Raisen Diet Campus , Sagar Road, Raisen-464551
7. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Morena Ambah Road P.O. Jigni Morena (MP) -467001
8. Kendriya Vidyalaya, ITI Campus , Etah (U.P. ) - 207001
9. Kendriya Vidyalaya, DIET Campus , Etawah 206001
का. आ. 507. ऑरोविले प्रतिष्ठान अधिनियम , 1988 ( 1988 का54) की धारा-12 के साथ पंठित धारा -11 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 29 अक्तूबर, 2012 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अनुसरण में श्री वाई. एस.वी.एस. मूर्ति, सचिव , श्री अरबिन्दो सोसायटी , काकीनाडा शाखा , 65-12-5/1 , नरासन्ना नगर , काकीनाडा, आंध्र प्रदेश-533003 , को दिनांक 29 अक्तूबर , 2012 से चार वर्ष की अवधि के लिए ऑरोविले प्रतिष्ठान के शासी बोर्ड का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. एफ-27-9/2012- यूयू]
वीना ईश , संयुक्त सचिव 10. Kendriya Vidyalaya, (Mahamaya Nagar ) Talab Chauraha, Old Collectorate Building, Hathars- 204101 1548
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 19th February, 2013
सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उद्यम मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 19 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 509. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 10 के उप - नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में , सूक्ष्म , लघु और मध्यम उद्यम मंत्रालय के नियंत्रणाधीन केयर बोर्ड ( मुख्यालय ) के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :-
S. O. 507. In continuation to this Ministry's Notification of even number dated 29th October, 2012 and in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 11 read with Section 12 , of the Auroville Foundation Act , 1988 (54 of 1988) , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Y. S. V. S. Murty, Secretary, Sri Aurobindo Society, Kakinda Branch, 65-12-5 / 1 , Narasanna Nagar, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh - 533003 , as a member of the Governing Board of the Auroville Foundation for a period of four . years w.e.f. 29th October, 2012 :
1 . शोरूम एवं बिक्री केन्द्र, कयर बोर्ड 5-8-328 / 1 , चापेल रोड , हैदराबाद -500001
[ F. No. F. 27-9/2012 - UU] VEENA ISH , Jt. Secy.
2. शोरूम एवं बिक्री केन्द्र , कयर बोर्ड , इंदिरा बाई पास , आमडो गोलाई के पास , पीओ ताडोंग , गंगटोक , सिक्किम-737102 वाणिज्य एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय (वाणिज्य विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2013
3. शोरूम एवं बिक्री केन्द्र, कयर बोर्ड , टीसी -25/360-2 , रामकृष्ण बिल्डिंग , मनोरमा रोड , ईस्ट तंपानूर तिरुवनंतपुरम-695001
4. शोरूम एवं बिक्री केन्द्र, कथर बोर्ड , जी , दिहांग , आखेड , भंगाधर पल्लवी मोटर्स के सामने , जी एस रोड, गुवाहाटी-781005
5. शोरूम एवं बिक्री केन्द्र , कयर बोर्ड , शिबनगर , कॉलेज रोड , अगरतला कॉलेज , पीओ अगरतला 799004
का. आ. 508. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम (4) के अनुसरण में वाणिज्य विभाग के अधीन एमएमटीसी लि. के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय को अधिसूचित करती है , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है:-
एमएमटीसी लि.
6. कयर बोर्ड प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , नं. 3 ए , पीनिया औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , टीवीएस क्रॉस के पास, पीनिया बैंगलूरू -560058
7. कयर बोर्ड प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , 5 , अलगप्पा ले आउट , वेंकटेश्वरा कालोनी , पोल्लाची-642001
8. कयर बोर्ड स्कीम कार्यालय , केयर बोर्ड , न्यू मॉडल मैट्स व मैटिंग को- ऑपरेटिव सोसाइटी बिल्डिंग , आलप्पुषा-688001 भारत सरकार का उपक्रम , 'पो. बा , सं. 3597 , द्वितीय तल , जोस ट्रस्ट बिल्डिंग , चिदूर रोड , एरणाकुलम, कोच्ची-682035
[फा.सं. ई -11013/ 1/2008 -हिन्दी ]
9. कयर बोर्ड प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , स्वराज नगर , ए सी गार्डन्स, दौलेसरम रोड, राजमुंद्री , आन्ध्र प्रदेश -533101
श्रीमती देवकी, निदेशक ( राजभाषा)
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce)
10. कयर बोर्ड प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , मनोरंजनी , टीसी/ 9/ 1821 ए शंकर लेन , एसआरएलसी -36 शास्तमंगलम , तिरुवनंतपुरम-695010
New Delhi , the 15th February, 2013
[फा. स. ई -12016/01/ 2005 -हिंदी ]
सी. के. मिश्रा , संयुक्त सचिव
MINISTRY OF MICRO , SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES
S. O. 508. In Pursuance of the rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby noti- fies the following regional office of MMTC. Ltd. under Department of Commerce , whereof more than 80% staff have acquired a working knowledge of Hindi :-
New Delhi , the 19th February, 2013
MMTC Ltd.
AGovt . of India Enterprise ,
P. Box No. 3597, II Floor , JosTrust Building, Chittoor Road, Ernakulam , Kochi-682035
[ F.No. E- 11013/ 1/2008-Hindi ]
S. O. 509.-In pursuance of Sub - Rule (4) of rule 10 ofthe Official Languages ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby noti- fies the following offices of Coir Board ( Headquarters ) , under the control of the Ministry of Micro , Small and Medium Enterprises whereof more than 80% staff have acquired working knowledge in Hindi :
Smt . DEVKI , Director (O.L. ) 1549
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Bangalore- 560058.
1. Showroom & Outlet, Coir Board, 5-8-328/ 1 , Chapel Road, Hyderabad-500001 , Andhra Pradesh .
7. Coir Board Regional Office , No. 5Alagappa Layout, Venkateswara Colony, Pollachi-642001 2. Showroom & Outlet, Coir Board, Indira Bye Pass , Near Amdo Golai , P.O. Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim- 737102.
8. CoirMark Scheme Office , Coir Board, New Model Coir Mats & Mattings Co - operative Society Building, Alappuzha-688001
9.
3. Showroom & Outlet, Coir Board , T.C. 25/360-2, Ram Krishna Building , Manorama Road , East Thampanoor, Trivandum-695001 .
CoirBoard Regional Office , Swaraj Nagar, A.C. Gardens, Doulesaram Road , Rajahmundry-533101 Andhra Pradesh.
4. Showroom & Outlet, Coir Board, 2G, Dihang Arcade, Bangaghar, opposite Pallavi Motors , G.S. Road, Guwahati -781005 .
10. Coir Board Regional Office , Manoranjinie , T.C. 9/ 1821 , SRL-C-36, Shankar Lane, Sasthamangalam P.O. Trivandrum - 695010
5.
[F. No. E- 12016/01 /2005 -Hindi ] Showroom & Outlet, Coir Board, Shibnagar College Road, College P.O. Agartala -799004.
C. K. MISHRA , Jt, Secy.
6. CoirBoard Regional Office , No. 3A Peenya Indus- trial Area , Near TVS Cross , Peenya ,
उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग ) (भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )
नई दिल्ली , 31 जनवरी , 2013
का. आ. 510. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियभ 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के संशोधनों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि
क्रम संख्या
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
स्थापित भारतीय मानकों के संशोधनों/मानकों की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
सितम्बर , 2012
कुछ नहीं
1.
संशोधन संख्या 3 - आई एस 1460: 2005 मोटर वाहन डीजल ईंधन-विशिष्टि ( पांचवा पुनरीक्षण)
सितम्बर, 2012
कुछ नहीं
2.
संशोधन संख्या 1- आई एस 4117: 2008 एलकोहल विगुणकर्मक-विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )
सितम्बर , 2012
कुछ नहीं
3.
संशोधन संख्या2- आई एस 7884: 2004 शैम्पूपृष्ठ सक्रियक से बना-विशिष्टि ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)
नवम्बर , 2012
कुछ नहीं
4.
आई एस 9573: 2012 द्रवित पेट्रोलियम गैस ( एल पी जी ) के लिए रबड़ हौज- विशिष्टि ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )
जनवरी , 2013
कुछ नहीं
5.
संशोधन संख्या1 - आई एस 8406: 1993 संलग्न औद्योगिक गियर चालन के लिए गियर स्नेहक-विशिष्टि ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण) 1550
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
इन भारतीय संशोधनों/मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई , तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
| संदर्भ पीसीडी/जी-7 ( गजट) ]
चित्रा गुप्ता , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' ( पी . सी. डी. )
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (Department of Consumer Affairs )
( BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS )
New Delhi , the 31st January, 2013
S. O. 510.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendments to Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated :
SCHEDULE
Sl . No.
Date of Established No. & Year and title of the Indian Standards Established
No. & Year of Indian Standards , if any, superseded by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
None
September, 2012 Amendment No. 3 to IS 1460 :2005 Automotive Diesel Fuel - Specification ( Fifth Revision)
2.
None
September, 2012 Amendment No. 1 to IS 4117 : 2008 Alcohol Denaturants - Specification (Second Revision)
3.
None
September, 2012 Amendment No. 2 to IS 7884: 2004 Shampoo , Surfactant Based- Specification ( Third Revision )
None
November , 2012 4. IS 9573 : 2012 Rubber Hose for Liquefied Petroleum Gas ( LPG )- Specification (Third Revision)
5.
None
January, 2013 Amendment No. 1 to IS 8406: 1993 Gear Lubricants for Enclosed Industrial Gear Drives - Specification (Second Revision)
Copies of these amendments/standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkatta , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[ Ref. PCD/G- 7 (Gazette)]
CHITRA GUPTA, Scientist ' E ' ( P.C.D. )
नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2013
का. आ. 511.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के विनियम ( 4 ) के उपविनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए है:-
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
1551
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि
क्रम संख्या
लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल
1
2
3
4
01.
03-01-2013 एल-9978122
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा भाग अनु वर्ष
6
5
78 9
ब्लॉक बोर्ड
1659
2004
.मै. लोटस वुडटेक प्रा.लि. दिल्लीरोहतक रोड, गाँव रोहद, बहादुरगढ़- 124507 जिला झज्जर ( हरियाणा )
02.
03-01-2013 एल-9978223
303 1989 सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिएप्लाईवुड
मै. लोटस वुडटेक प्रा.लि. दिल्लीरोहतक रोड, गाँव रोहद, बहादुरगढ़ - 124507 जिला झज्जर ( हरियाणा )
03.
एल -9978627 08-01-2013
14543
2004 पैकेजबन्द पेयजल (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
मै. कपिल बैवरेज , गाँव बाखरी , प्लॉट नं. 5 , बड़खलपाली रोड़, जिला फरीदाबाद ( हरियाणा )
04.
14-01-2013 एल -9977120
9798 1995 द्रवितपैट्रोलियम गैस (द्र पै गै ) मिश्रण के उपयोग के लिए अल्पदाब रेगूलेटर
मै. ओलम्पिक इन्जीनियर्स प्रा. लि. प्लॉट नं. 66 ,सैक्टर-6 आईएमटी, मनेसर , जिला गुडगाँव - 122050 (हरियाणा)
05.
14-01-2013 एल -9977221
8737 1995 5 लीटर से अधिक पानी की क्षमता वाले द्रवित पैट्रोलियम गैस ( द्र पै गै ) सिलिंडरों के उपयोग के लिए वाल्वफिटिंगें
मै. ओलम्पिक इन्जीनियर्स प्रा. लि. प्लॉट नं. 66, सैक्टर -6 आईएमटी, मनेसर, जिला गुडगाँव -122050 (हरियाणा)
06.
एल-9980008
16-01-2013
7098 03 1993
मै. एल.एस. केबल इंडिया प्रा.लि. प्लॉट नं. 28-31 ,सैक्टर-5 , फेस-11 जीसी बावल , बावल , जिला रेवाड़ी-123501 (हरियाणा)
07.
16-01-2013 एल-9980513
अनुप्रस्थ जुड़े हुए पौलीइथाईलीन विधुतरोधी ताप स्थायी ढके केबल भाग 3: 66 किलो वोल्ट से 220किलो वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए
14543-- 2004 पैकेजबन्द पेयजल (पैकेजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
मै. हरीश एक्वा एन्टरप्राइसिस , गाँव छावन , पटौदी, जिला गुडगाँव , (हरियाणा)
651GI/13-2
[सं. सी. एम डी/13 : 11 ]
एम. के. जैन , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख 1552.
[ PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
New Delhi, the 13th February, 2013
S. O. 511.-In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certifica- tion) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are givenin the following schedule :
Grant Date Licences No. CM/L-
SCHEDULE
Year Tititle of the Standard IS No. Part Sec .
Name & Address of the Licensee Sl. No.
2
3
4 1
03-01-2013 01. L-9978122
6
5
7
8
9
1659
2004 BlockBoard .
M/s. Louts Woodtech Pvt. Ltd. , Delhi -Rohtak Road, Village Rohad, Bahadurgarh - 124507 Distt. Jhajjar, (Haryana)
03-01-2013 02. L-9978223
303 1989 Plywood for General Purposes
M/s . Louts Woodtech Pvt. Ltd. , Delhi - Rohtak Road, VillageRohad, Bahadurgarh - 124507 Distt. Jhajjar, (Haryana)
08-01-2013 03. L -9978627
2004
14543
Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/ s. Kapil Beverage , Village Bakhri , Plot No.5, Badkhal Pali Road , Distt. Faridabad , (Haryana)
14-01-2013 04. L-9977120
1995
9798
Low Pressure Regulators for use with Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Mixtures
Pvt . Ltd. , M/ s . Olympic Engineers Plot No. 66 , Sector -6 IMT, Manesar, Distt.Gurgaon-122050 (Haryana)
14-01-2013 05. L-9977221
8737
1995 Valve Fitting for use with Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG ) Cylinders of More than 5- Litre Water Capacity
M/s. Olympic Engineers Pvt. Ltd., PlotNo. 66 , Sector -6 IMT, Manesar , Distt.Gurgaon- 122050 (Haryana)
16-01-2013 06. L - 9980008
1995 Sheathed Cables Cross- limked Polyethylene 7098 03 Insulated Thermoplastic Part3 : For Working Voltages from 66 kv upto and including 220kv
Pvt. Ltd. , M/ s . L.S. Cable India Plot No. 28-31 , Sector - 5 , Phase - II , GC Bawal , Bawal, Distt.Rewari - 123501 (Haryana)
16-01-2013 07. L-9980513
2004
14543
Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)
M/s Harish Aqua
Enterprises,
Village Chhavan, Pataudi ,
Distt.Gurgaon,
(Haryana)
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 |
M. K. JAIN , Scientist ' F ' & Head 1553 [भाग- II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
कोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 20 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 512.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि से कोयला अभिप्राप्त होने की संभावना है ;
और , इसके अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक संख्या सी- 1 (ई) ।।। /एफयूआर/887-1012, तारीख 11 अक्तूबर , 2012, उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि का क्षेत्र के ब्यौरे दिए गए हैं, निरीक्षण, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, ( राजस्व विभाग) , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर 440 001 (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन प्रभाग ) , केन्द्रीय खान योजना और डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना पैलेस , कांके रोड, रांची 834 001 के कार्यालय में या कोयला निंयत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता 700 001 के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर, नागपुर और जिला कलेक्टर , चंद्रपुर (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम , 1957 (1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए पूर्वोक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति --
(i ) उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 के अधीन किसी नुकसानी या अधिनियम की धारा 4 की उप- धारा (3 ) के अधीन होने वाले नुकसान की संभावना के लिए प्रतिकर का दावा कर सकेगा ; अथवा
(ii) उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन समाप्त हो गई पूर्वेक्षण अनुज्ञप्तियों की बाबत या उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप -धारा (4) के अधीन समाप्त हो गए खनन पट्टे के लिए प्रतिकर का दावा कर सकेगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (i ) से खंड ( iv) में विनिर्दिष्ट मदों की बाबत उपगत व्यय को उपदर्शित करने के लिए पूर्वोक्त भूमि से संबंधित सभी मानचित्रों , चार्टों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को सुपुर्द करेगा,
इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर, मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, उमरेड़ क्षेत्र , पोस्ट उमरेड़ , तहसील उमरेड़ , जिला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्र) या महाप्रबंधक, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , भूमि और राजस्व विभाग , कोल ईस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर - 440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) को भेजेगा ।
1554
[PART 11-- SEC . 3 (ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
भगवानपुर ब्लाक
उमरेड़ क्षेत्र
जिला नागपुर ( महाराष्ट्र )
[ रेखांक संख्या सी -1 ( ई ) III /एफयूआर// 887-1012 , तारीख 11 अक्तूबर , 2012 ]
भाम-'क'
टिप्पणी जिला
तहसील
ग्राम का नाम पटवारी सर्किल संख्या क्रम सं.
38 1 नांद
कुल (क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में )
भाग
242.00
नागपुर
भिवापुर
39 2 वणी
भाग
261.00
नागपुर
भिवापुर
39 3
573.44
पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
अल्सुर
39 4 जामगांव
181.85
पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
39 5
खोलड़ोड़ा
181.26 पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
40क 6
भाग
31.00
भिवापुर
सुकली
40क 7 पोलगांव
नागपुर
288.00
भाग
भिवापुर नागपुर
40क 8
20.00
भाग
नागपुर
भिवापुर
खुरसापार
40 9 सायगांव
326.40
पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
40 10
547.94
पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
भगवानपुर
40
11 साकरा
194.41 पूर्ण
भिवापुर
40 12 खारकाड़ा
नागपुर
471.61
पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
40 खापरी
13
386.47
पूर्ण
नागपुर
भिवापुर
14 वाढोना 19 चिमुर चंद्रपुर 80.00 भाग
15 डोंगरल। 19 चिमुर चंद्रपुर 169.02 पूर्ण
16 19 चंद्रपुर 313.00 भाग
जांभुल विहिरा चिमुर
17 सावरला 19 चंद्रपुर 70.00 भाग
चिमुर
कुल क्षेत्र : 4337.40 हेक्टर ( लगभग )
या 10717.72 एकड़ (लगभग) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1555
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
भाग-'ख ' ( आरक्षित वन )
रेंज
तहसील
टिप्पणी
जिला
क्रम डिवीजन संख्या
1 उमरेड़ साऊथ
अलसुर भिवापुर कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या/ ग्राम
कुल (क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में )
348
पूर्ण
303.52
नागपुर
2 उमरेड़ साऊथ खोलड़ोड़ा
349
पूर्ण
248.88
345
पूर्ण
268.71
नागपुर
भिवापुर
भीसी
3 ब्रम्हपुरी
चिमुर 346
पूर्ण
17.60
347
पूर्ण
81.34
कीटाड़ी
पूर्ण
31.69
चंद्रपुर
कुल क्षेत्र : 951.74 हेक्टर ( लगभग )
या 2351.75 एकड़ (लगभग)
भाग -' ग ' ( संरक्षित वन )
रेंज
डिवीजन
जिला
तहसील क्रम संख्या
1 उमरेड़ साऊथ
सायगांव
टिप्पणी कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या/ ग्राम
कुल (क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में )
427
पूर्ण
46.20
नागपुर
भिवापुर
2 उमरेड़ साऊथ
अलसुर
428
पूर्ण
39.43
नागपुर
भिवापुर
भीसी
3 ब्रम्हपुरी
चिमुर
पूर्ण
49.28
चंद्रपुर
भीसी
4 ब्रम्हपुरी
चिमुर जांभुल विह्निरा
5.08
सावरला
चंद्रपुर
+
भाग - ' क'
भाग - ' ख' +
पूर्ण
कुल क्षेत्र : 139.99 हेक्टर लगभग )
या 345.91 एकड़ ( लगभग)
भाग -'ग' =
+
4337.40
+
951.74
कुल क्षेत्रफल
139.99
=
या
10717.72
+
+ 2351.75 5429.13 हेक्टर ( लगभग)
345.91
=
13415.38 एकड़ (लगभग) 1556
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
सीमा वर्णन :
क - ख : रेखा बिन्दु ' क' के ग्राम नांद से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम सुकली और पोलगावं से होती हुई ग्राम खुरसापार की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु ' ख' पर मिलती है ।
ख - ग : रेखा ग्राम खुरसापार से निकलकर ग्राम भगवानपुर और आरक्षित वन से होकर ग्राम चकशिवानी के आरक्षित वन में बिन्दु 'ग' पर मिलती है ।
ग - घ : रेखा आरक्षित वन से होती हुई ग्राम वादोना से गुजरती है और ग्राम वाढोना की सीमा पर बिन्दु 'घ' पर मिलती है ।
घ - ड. : रेखा ग्राम खापरी से होती हुई ग्राम डोंगराला की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु 'ड.' पर मिलती है ।
ड. - च : रेखा ग्राम डोंगराला और ग्राम सावरला से गुजरती हुई ग्राम कीटाड़ी के सीमा रेखा पर बिन्दु ' च' पर मिलती है ।
च - छ : रेखा ग्राम सावरला से गुजरती हुई ग्राम जांभुल विहिरा के सीमा रेखा पर बिन्दु ' छ' पर मिलती है ।
रेखा ग्राम जांभुल विहिरा से होती हुई ग्राम जांभुल विहिरा में बिन्दु 'ज' पर मिलती है।
छ - ज:
रेखा ग्राम जांभुल विहिरा और डोंगरगांव कालु से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु' झ' पर मिलती है।
ज - झ :
झ - ञ : रेखा आरक्षित वन से गुजरती हुई ग्राम जामगांव की सम्मिलित रेखा पर बिन्दु 'ञ' पर मिलती है ।
ञ - ट : रेखा जामगांव और आरक्षित वन से गुजरती हुई आरक्षित वन में बिन्दु 'ट' पर मिलती है ।
रेखा आरक्षित वन से गुजरती हुई आरक्षित वन में बिन्दु 'ठ' पर मिलती है ।
ट - ठ :
रेखा आरक्षित वन से गुजरती हुई आरक्षित वन में बिन्दु ' ड' पर मिलती है ।
ठ - ड :
ड - ढ : रेखा आरक्षित वन और ग्राम जामगांव से गुजरती हुई ग्राम वणी की ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु 'ढ' पर मिलती है ।
1557 [ भाग खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
ढ - ण: रेखा ग्राम वणी और ग्राम खारकाड़ा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम नांद की सीमा रेखा पर बिन्दु 'ण' पर मिलती है ।
ण - क : रेखा ग्राम नांद से होकर गुजरती है और ग्राम सुकाली में आरंभिक बिन्दु 'क' पर मिलती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/31 /2012- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
वी. एस. राणा , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2013
S.O. 512. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in the locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;
And whereas , the plan bearing number C - 1 ( E ) III / FUR/887-1012 , dated the 11th October, 2012 containing details of the areas of land described in the said Schedule may beinspected at the office of the Western Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Department) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 ( Maharashtra ) or at the office of the Chief General Manager(Exploration Division ) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road , Ranchi 834 001 or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700001 or at the office of the District Collector, Nagpur and District Collector, Chandrapur ( Maharashtra ) .
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in the land described in the aforesaid Schedule.
Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may -
(i ) claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any action taken under sub- section (3 ) of section 4 thereof ; or
( ii) claim compensation under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of prospecting license ceasingto have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to have effect and deliver all maps , charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses ( i ) to (iv ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 13 of the said Act ,
to the Office of the Chief General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited , Umrer Area , PostUmrer, Tahsil Umrer , District Nagpur ( Maharashtra ) or General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited , Land and Revenue Department , Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur 440 001 ( Maharashtra ) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification .
1558
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii))
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
SCHEDULE
Bhagwanpur Block
Umrer Area
District Nagpur (Maharashtra)
[Plan bearing number C - 1 (E) III/FUR/ 887-1012 , dated the 11th October , 2012 ]
Part 'A'
District
Tahsil
Name of Village Patwari Circle Number Sl . No.
38 1 Nand
Rema- rks
Total (area in hectares)
242.00. Part
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
39 2 Wani
261.00 Part
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
39 3 Alesur
573.44 Full
Bhiwapur
39 Nagpur
181.85 Full
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
4 Jamgaon
39 5 Kholdoda
181.26 Full
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
40A 6 Sukali
Part
31.00
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
40A
7 Polgaon
288.00
Part
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
40A
8 Khursapar
20.00 Part
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
40
326.40 Full
Bhiwapur
9 Saigaon
40 Nagpur
Full
547.94
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
10 Bhagwanpur
40 11 Sakara
Full
194.41
Bhiwapur Nagpur
40
12 Kharkada
Full
471.61
Bhiwapur
40 Nagpur
386.47 Full
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
13 Khapri
19
80.00
Part
Chimur
14 Wadhona
Chandrapur
169.02 Full
Chimur
19
Dongarla
15
19 Chandrapur
313.00 Part
Chimur
Jambhul- Vihira
16
19 Chandrapur
70.00
Part
Chimur
Sawarla
17
Chandrapur
Total area : 4337.40 hectares
(approximately)
10717.72 acres
or
(approximately ) 1559
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11, 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
Part ' B' (Reserved Forest)
District
Tahsil
Division
Range
Rema- rks Sl . No.
Total (areain hectares)
Compartment Number/ Village
Full
303.52
348
Alesur
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
248.88 Full 1 Umrer South
349
268.71 Full
345
Bhiwapur Nagpur
Kholdoda
Full 2 Umrer South
17.60
346
Full
81.34
347
Full
31.69
Kitadi
Chandrapur
Chimur
Bhisi
3 Brahmpuri
Total area : 951.74 hectares (approximately)
or
2351.75 acres (approximately)
Part ' C ' (Protected Forest)
District
Tahsil
Division
Range
Rema- rks Sl . No.
Total (areain hectares)
Compart- ment Number/ Village
Full
46.20
427
Bhiwapur Nagpur
Saigaon
1 Umrer South
Full
39.43
428
Alesur
Nagpur
Bhiwapur
2 Umrer South
Full
49.28
Jambhul Vihira
Chandrapur
Chimur
Bhisi
3 Brahmpuri
Full
5.08
Sawarla
Chandrapur
Chimur
Brahmpuri Bhisi
4
Total area : 139.99 hectares (approximately)
or
345.91 acres (approximately)
651GI /13-3 1560
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II -SEC . 3(ii)]
Part 'A' + Part 'B' +
Part ' C' Total area
4337.40
951.74
+ + 139.99 = 5429.13 hectares ( approximately ) or 10717.72 + 2351.75 + 345.91 = 13415.38 acres ( approximately)
Boundary description :
A- B : Line starts from Point 'A' Nand village and passes through village Sukali, Polgaon and meets at Point ' B ' in village boundary of Khursapar.
B - C : Line passes through village Khursapar , Bhagwanpur and passes through Reserved Forest and meets at Point 'C' in village Chak Shiwani Reserve Forest .
C - D : Line passes through Reserve Forest and village Wadhona to meets at Point'D ' in village boundary of Wadhona.
D - E :
Line passes through village Khapari and meets at Point ' E ' in village boundary of Dongarala .
E - F : Line passes along village boundary of Dongarala , Sawarla and meets at Point' F' in village Kitadi .
F - G :
Line passes through village Sawarla and meets at Point 'G' in village boundary of Dongarla.
G - H : Line passes through village Jambhul Vihira and meets at Point 'H' in village Jambhul Vihira .
H - I : Line passes through villages Jambhul Vihira and Dongargaon Kalu and meets at Point ' I' .
I -J :
Line passes through reserve forest and meets at Point ' J' of village boundary of Jamgaon.
J - K : Line passes through reserve forest and meets at Point ' K' in reserve forest .
K - L : Linepasses through reserve forest and meets at Point ' L' in reserve forest .
L - M :
Line passes through reserve forest and meets at Point ' M' in reserve forest.
M - N : Line passes through reserve forest and village Jamgaon and meets at Point 'N' in Wani village boundary.
1561 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
M - O :
Line passes through villages Wani , Kharkada and meets at Point 'O ' in Nand village boundary .
O - A : Line passes through village Nand and meets at starting Point ' A ' in Sukali village boundary.
[ F. No. 43015/31 /2012-PRIW- I) V. S. RANA , Under Secy.
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 513.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में पारादीप (उड़ीसा) से दुर्गापुर, (पश्चिम बंगाल ) तक वाया हल्दिया एलपीजी गैस परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय 'की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस.सी. सरकार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस . (प्रशासनिक) सेवानिवृत्त सक्षम प्राधिकारी , पारादीप - हल्दिया दुर्गापुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप- हल्दिया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन ऑगमेंटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल मौरी , मौरीग्राम हावड़ा-711 302 (पश्चिम बंगाल) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
1562
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल
जिला : पूर्व मेदिनीपुर
पुलिस स्टेशन: तमलुक – ।
खसरा सं.
मौजा का नाम
कम सं.
2
3 1
09
283
1 कापासबेड़या
10 क्षेत्रफल
एयर वर्ग मी.
हेक्टेयर
6
4
5
00
03
00
20
00
05
10
01
00
31/1719
32 00 00 20
30 00 03 10
28 00 01 80
26 00 01 10
22 00 01 10
29 00 00 20
50 00 02 20
51 00 00 20
00 01 60
49/1723
53 00 02 40
68 00 02 80
301 00 04 00
300 00 01 40
308 00 01 80
309 00 01 10
292 00 02 60
291 00 05 60
293 00 00 20
288 00 05 80
286 00 02 90
285 00 01 00
464 00 04 20
463 00 06 40
00 00 20
470/1741
60
00
472/1742
471 472
05
00 00 20 00 06 00 00 00 20
472/1745
00
20
00
472/1746
256
01
60
00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1563
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
कापासबेड्या 283 543 00 00 20
जारी..... 486 00 01 00
541 00 04 20
538 00 05 30
536 00 00 80
534 00 04 70
533' 00 00 20
770 00 09 60
771 00 02 90
00 01 00
749/1762
00
02
20
817/1907
00
90
03
817/1906
817 00 03 10
00 01 10
817/1905
814 00 00 70 816 00 02 30 820 00 01 90 815 00 00 20 819 00 00 20 821 00 02 10 822 00 00 60
821 व 823 के मध्य
00 00 20
823 00 02 10
00 01 80
857/1784
857 00 01 80
00 01 30
857/1782
00
00
90
857/1781
00
00
90
857/1780
00
04
00
863/1786
00
00
20
856/1776
855 00 01 20
863 00 01 20
849 00 01 30
848 00 03 60
850 00 00 20
00 00 40
850/1775
-845 00
01
10 1564
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3
2
1
283
6
4
5
00
50
01
847/1817
कापासबेड्या
1196
जारी .....
50
01
00
01
40
00
1558/1889
1539 00 01 00
00 00 90
1536/1687
1536 00 01 50 1534 00 01 90 1533 00 01 00 1545 00 01 60 1547 00 02 70 1526 00 00 50 1548 00 00 20 1549 00 00 50 1525 00 02 20 1524 00 02 40 1523 00 01 90 1522 00 00 50 1610 00 00 20 1611 00 00 80 1612 00 01 30 1514 00 02 70 1513 00 02 30 1614 00 05 10 1520 00 00 20 1517 00 00 40 1518 00 02 20 1519 00 01 10 1636 00 02 10 1635 00 00 20 1642 00 00 80 1643 00 01 60 1644 00 00 20 1645 00 02 00 1631 00 03 40 1647 00 00 20 1648 00 01 20 1649 00 00 90
[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
1565
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
1566
4 5 6
2 3
1 1 2 3 4 5 6
00 01 70
कापासबेड्या आमगेछया 95 283 364
1650 00 00 20
जारी..... 367 00 00 70
जारी..... 1651 00 00 20
00 00 30
1639 398 00 01 20
399 00 00 60
1470 00 00 20
1469 451 00 00 00 00 90 20
1468 00 00 02 06 20 60
452
1466 00 00 00 00 20 20
455
2 निश्चिन्तबसान 147 1176 00 01 00 30 50
456 00
1282- 00 02 80 60
457 00 01
1755 00 00 90 80
461 00 01
1756 .00 03 10
00 06 00
458
1757 00 02 80
459 00 01 10
1758 00 00 70
644 00 03 60
1761 00 00 60
00 01 70
612
1762 00 00 20
642 00 03 90
आमगेछ्या 95 310 00 01 10
00 06 90
641
311 00 05 40
640 00 02 40
306 00 03 10
637 00 02 40
322 00 05 20
636 00 03 90
321 00 00 30
635 00 02 60
323 00 04 60
631 00 00 60
320 00 01 60
502 00 03 40
4 नरसिंहकालुया 94 325 00 03 00
324 501 00 00 02 70
00 20
329 506 00 00 02 00 30
80
336 507 00 00 03 01 40 20
335 00 00 00 20 20
500 00
337 00 03 40 00
508 00 02
346 00 03 80
509 00 02 80
341 00 00 20
513 00 02 20
342 00 00 30
00 02 20
514
343 00 00 70
517 00 01 10
345 00 02 10
00 01 60
516
344 00 00 20
518 00 00 20
360 00 01 30
00 03 00
524
362 00 00 50
00 CC 60
523
363 00 00 50
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1567
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
2 3 4 5 6
1
नरसिंहकालुया 94 525 00 04 90
जारी..... 526 00 01 50
5 बलिकालुया 93 48 00 01 30
89 00 02 50
50 00 01 20
51 00 00 80
52 00 01 30
53 00 00 20
420 00 06 10
54 00 03 00
55 00 02 20
56 00 00 20
151 00 01 70
150 00 01 00
155 00 01 00
146 00 00 20
156 00 02 60
348 00 05 80
349 00 00 50
350 00 09 80
353 00 01 40
352 00 01 60
356 00 04 30
361 00 00 40
346 00 00 20
360 00 04 30
364 00 01 00
363 00 00 50
368 00 02 30
367 00 01 70
00 02 00
390/413
390: 393 392 404 405 406
651 GI /13-4
00 05 10 00 01 10 00 00 20 00 02 00 00 01 60 00 01 40
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )] 1568
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
6
5
4
3
2
1
70
00
03
407
बलिकालुया 93
20
00
00
408
जारी.
70
00
00
35
6 कन्ठीबाड़ 58
21
00
01
34
00
30
00
33
20
01
00
26
00
90
00
24
80
01
00
23
00
01
50
22
60
00
00
14
[फा. सं. आर-25011/27/2012- ओ.आर. -1 ]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2013
S.O. 513.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip ( Odisha ) to Durgapur (West Bengal ) Via Haldia a pipeline should be laid in State of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto.
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C.Sarkar, W.B.C.S ( Exe. ) Retd . Competent Authority Paradip - Haldia -Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip - Haldia -Barauni Pipeline Project , P.O , Duillya , Andul - Mouri , Mourigram , Howrah , 711-302 (West Bengal ) [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1569
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
SCHEDULE
PS : TAMLUK - 1 DISTRICT : PURBA MEDINIPUR
SI .
Name of the Mouza Khasra No.
No.
1 2 3
1 KAPASBERYA - 283 09
10
31/1719
32
30.
28
26
22
29
50
51
49/1723
53
68
301
300
308
309
292
291
293
288
286
285
464
463
470/1741
472/1742
471
472
472/1745
472/1746
256
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
4 5 6
00 03 00
00 05 20
00 01 10
00 00 20
00 03 10
00 01 80
00 01 10
00 01 10
00 00 20
00 02 20
00 00 20
00 01 60
00 02 40
00 02 80
00 04 00
00 01 40
00 01 80
00 01 10
00 02 60
00 05 60
00 00 20
00 05 80
00 02 90
00 01 00
00 04 20
00 06 40
00 00 20
00 05 60
00 00 20
00 06 00
00 00 20
00 00. 20
00 01 60
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii))
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1570
3
2
1
543
KAPASBERYA - 283
486
Contd..
541
538
536
534
533
770
771
6
4
5
20
00
00
00
01
00
20
04
00
30
05
00
80
00
00
70
04
00
20
00
00
60
09
00
02
90
00
00
01
00
749/1762
20
02
00
817/1907
90
03
00
817/1906
00 03 10
817
00 01 10
817/1905
00 70
814 00
00 02 30
816
00 01 90
820
00 00 20
815
00 00 20
819
00 02 10
821
822 00 00 60
00 00 20
SvyNumber in between 821 to 823
00 02 10
823
857/1784 00 01 80
00 01 80
857
00 01 30
857/1782
90
00
00
857/1781
90
00
00
857/1780
00
04
00
863/1786
20
00
00
856/1776
00 01 20
855
00 01 20
863
00 01 30
849
00 03 60
848
00 00 20
850
00 00 40
850/1775
845
10
01
00 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1571
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
847/1817 KAPASBERYA - 283
Contd ...
1196 4
5
6
00
01
50
00
50
01
40
00
01
1558/1889
1539 00 01 00 1536/1687 00 00 90 1536 00 01 50 1534 00 01 90 1533 00 01 00 1545 00 01 60 1547 00 02 70 1526 00 00 50 1548 00 00 20 1549 00 00 50 1525 00 02 20 1524 00 02 40 1523 00 01 90 1522 00 00 50 1610 00 00 20 1611 00 00 80 1612 00 01 30 1514 00 02 70 1513 00 02 30 1614 00 05 10 1520 00 00 20 1517 00 00 40 1518 00 02 20 1519 00 01 10 1636 00 02 10 1635 00 00 20 1642 00 00 80 1643 00 01 60 1644 00 00 20 1645 00 02 00 1631 00 03 40 1647 00 00 20 1648 00 01 20 1649 00 00 90
1572
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3
KAPASBERYA - 283 1650
Contd ... 1651
1639
1470
1469
1468
1466
2 NISHCHINTABASAN - 147 1176
1282
1755
1756
1757
1758
1761
1762
3 AMGECHHYA - 95 310
311
306
322
321
323
320
325
324
329
336
335
337
346
341
342
343
345
344
360
362
363
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
4 5 6 00 00 20 00 00 20 00 01 20 00 00 20 00 00 90 00 02 20 00 00 20 00 01 30 00 02 80 00 00 90 00 03 10 00 02 80 00 00 70 00 00 60 00 00 20 00 01 10 00 05 40 00 03 10 00 05 20 00 00 30 00 04 60 00 01 60 00 03 00 00 00 20 00 02 80 00 03 40 00 00 20 00 03 40 00 03 80 00 00 20 00 00 30 00 00 70 00 02 10 00 00 20 00 01 30 00 00 50 00 00 50
[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
1573
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2
3 4 5 6
AMGECHHYA - 95 364 00 01 70
Contd.. 367
00 00 70
398 00 00 30
399 00 00 60
451 00 00 20
452 00 06 60
455 00 00 20
456 00 00 50
457 00 01 .60
461 00 01 80
458 00 06 00
459 00 01 10
644 00 03 60
612 00 01 70
642 00 03 90
641 00 06 90
640 00 02 40
637 00 02 40
636 00 03 90
635 00 02 60
631 00 00 60
4 NARSINGKALUA - 94
502 00 03 40
501 00 02 70
506 00 00 30
507 00 01 20
500 00 00 20
508 00 02 00
509 00 02 80
513 00 02 20
514 00 02 20
517 00 01 10
516 00 01 60
518 00 00 20
524. CO 03 00
523 00 00 60
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MАКСН2 , 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1574
4 5 6
3
2
1
00 04 90
525
NARSINGKALUA - 94
00 01 50
526
Contd.
01 30
48 00
5 BALIKALUA - 93 50
00 02
89
00 01 20
50
00 00 80
51
01 30
52 00
00 00 20
53
00 06 10
420
03 00
54 00
00 02 20
55
00 00 20
56
01 70
151 00
00 01 00
150
01 00
155 00
00 00 20
146
00 02 60
156
00 05 80
348
00 00 50
349
00 09 80
350
01 40
353 00
01 60
00
352
00 04 30
356
00 00 40
361
00 20
346 00
00 04 30
360
01 00
00
364
00 00 50
363
02 30
368 00
01 70
367 00
00 02 00
390/413
00 05 10
390
00 01 10
393
00 00 20
392
00 02 00
404
01 60
405 00
01 40
406 00
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1575
1
2
3
4
5
6
BALIKALUA - 93
407
00
03
70
Contd ..
408
00
00
20
6 KANTHIBAR - 58
35
00
70
00
34
00
01.
21
33
00
00
30
26
00
01
20
24
00
00
90
23
00
01
80
22
00
01
50
14
00
00
60
[ F. No. R- 25011 /27/2012-O.R. - I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 20 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 514.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पश्चिम बगाल राज्य में पारादीप (उड़ीसा) से दुर्गापुर (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक वाया हल्दिया एलपीजी गैस परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस.सी. सरकार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस . (प्रशासनिक) सेवानिवृत्त सक्षम प्राधिकारी , पारादीप - हल्दिया- दुर्गापुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप हल्दिया- बरौनी पाइपलाइन ऑगमेंटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल - मौरी, मौरीग्राम हावड़ा-711 302 (पश्चिम बंगाल) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
651 GI /13-5 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]
1576
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल
।। जिला : पूर्व मेदिनीपुर
पुलिस स्टेशन : तमलुक
क्षेत्रफल
मौजा का नाम
एयर वर्ग मी.
हेक्टेयर
खसरा सं.
(आर.एस.)
कम सं.
6
5
4
3
2
1
30
02
00
1581
60
1 दक्षिण उसतपुर
02
40
00
1583
40
00
00
1582
80
00
00
1584
30
00
02
1585
60
02
00
1586
90
01
00
1588
20
00
00
1587
10
03
00
1616/1775
00 03 00
1596
1597 00 01 70
00 00 70
1566
00 02 70
1605
00 03 50
1604
00 02 20
1268
00 00 40
1267
1266 00 02 20
1265 00 03 20
1264 00 02 40
00 00 20
1270
1271 00 01 30
1260 00 03 70
00 02 40
1259
00 03 00
1252
1253/1770 00 00 60
1253 00 03 20
00 01 00
1244
1243 00 02 20
1242 00 01 90
00 00 20
1240
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1577
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
2
3 1
1241 दक्षिण उसतपुर 60
जारी.....
1239
1238
1158
1005 4
5
6
00
02
60
00
04
30
00
02
80
00
00
40
00
00
20
00
05
30
1004/1721
1008 00 05 00
1009 00 06 20
1011 00 01 40
1012 00 00 40
1013 00 04 40
00 02 00
968/1759
1140 00 00 50
951 00 02 10
00 00 30
1019/1763
969 00 00 20
950 00 00 40
949 00 03 60
2. पदमपुर 99 628 00 03 00-
595 00 03 80
596 00 01 50
594 00 00 20
597 00 00 90
584 00 02 00
582 00 00 20
600 00 00 20
583 00 01 60
599 00 01 70
601 00 01 90
602 00 00 70
603 00 00 40
604 00 00 70
622 00 01 10
606 00 00 40
1578
[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 5 6
3
1 2
00 01 80
611
पदमपुर 99
00 01 30
610
जारी.....
00 00 80
515
00 00 60
484
00 01 80
483
00 40
480 00
00 00 20
479
00 00 20
490
00 40
482 00
00 04 40
478
00 00 20
491
00 06 00
492
00 02 50
495
00 01 10
496
00 04 00
500
00 00 20
499
00 02 40
501
00 05 80
393
00 00 20
390
00 03 70
392
00 07 40
367
00 05 90
366
00 00 20
397
00 00 70
398
00 01 50
110
04 70
109 00
00 06 30
108
00 00 40
107
00 03 90
66/659
00 05 10
103
00 09 10
102
00 02 90
101
00 02 30
95
00 00 30
94
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1579
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
96 पदमपुर 99
जारी.....
91 4
5
6
00
01
20
00
02
00
00
70
00
87/639
2 00 01 10
3 राजगोदा 100 466 00 04 40
248 00 02 00
247 00 01 60
249 00 05 60
464 00 09 50
251 00 01 30
262 00 10 60
463 00 00 20
00 05 60
262/607
263 00 08 50
264 00 00 20
267 00 08 30
266 00 06 50
274 00 07 00
273 00 05 30
272 00 05 70
284 00 03 50
283 00 04 40
287 00 00 20
288 00 01 20
290 00 01 80
289 00 00 20
291 00 02 70
298 00 05 40
296 00 00 90
00 05 50
295/596
295 00 00 50 56 00 00 50 55 00 00 40 54 00 00 40
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ] 1580
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
5
3
4
6
1 2
01
70
00
304
राजगोदा 100
00
04
80
305
जारी.....
70
00
04
307
40
00
04
310
04
10
00
45
[फा. सं. आर-25011/27/2012- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2013
S.O. 514. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal ) Via Haldia a pipeline should be laid in State of WestBengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
Andwhereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C.Sarkar, W.B.C.S (Exe . ) Retd . Competent Authority Paradip - Haldia -Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip - Haldia --Barauni Pipeline Project , P.O, Duillya , Andu ! - Mouri , Mourigram , Howrah , 711-302 (West Bengal ) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ⅱ) ]
1581
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11,-1934
SCHEDULE
PS : TAMLUK - H
STATE : WEST BENGAL
DISTRICT : PURBA MEDINIPUR
Name of the Mouza
SI . No.
Area
Khasra No.
(R.S.)
Hectare Are Sq.mtr .
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DAKSHIN USATPUR - 60 1581 00 02 30
1583 00 02 40
1582 00 00 40
1584 00 00 80
1585 00 02 30
1586 00 02 60
1588 00 01 90
1587 00 00 20
1616/1775 00 03 10
1596 00 03 00
1597 00 01 70
1566 00 00 70
1605 00 02 70
1604 00 03 50
1268 00 02 20
1267 00 00 40
1266 00 02 20
1265 00 03 20
1264 00 02 40
1270 00 00 20
1271 00 01 30
1260 00 03 70
1259 00 02 40
1252 00 03 00
1253/1770 00 00 60
1253 00 03 20
1244 00 01 00
1243 00 02 20
1242 00 01 90
1240 00 00 20
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1582
3 4 5 6
1 2
DAKSHIN USATPUR - 60 1241 00 02 60
1239 00 04 30
Contd...
1238 00 02 80
1158 00 00 40
1005 00 00 20
1004/1721 00 05 30
1008 00 05 00
1009 00 06 20
1011 00 01 40
1012 00 00 40
1013 00 04 40
00 02 00
968/1759
1140 00 00 50
951 00 02 10
00 00 30
1019/1763
969 00 00 20
950 00 00 40
949 00 03 60
628 00 03 00
2 PADAMPUR - 99
595 00 03 80
596 00 01 50
594 00 00 20
597 00 00 90
584 00 02 00
582 00 00 20
600 00 00 20
583 00 01 60
599 00 01 70
601 00 01 90
602 00 00 70
603 00 00 40
604 00 00 70
622 00 01 10
606 00 00 40
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 . 2
3
PADAMPUR - 99 611
Contd... 610
515
484
483
480
479
490
482
478
491
492
495
496
500
499
501
393
390
392
367
366
397
398
110
109
108
107
66/659
103
102
101
95
94
651GI /13-6
1583
4 5 6 00 01 80 00 01 30 00 00 80 00 00 60 00 01 80 00 00 40 00 00 20 00 00 20 00 00 40 00 04 40 00 00 20 00 06 00 00 02 50 00 01 10 00 04 00 00 00 20 00 02 40 00 05 80 00 00 20 00 03 70 00 07 40 00 05 90 00 00 20 00 00 70 00 01 50 00 04 70 00 06 30 00 00 40 00 03 90 00 05 10 00 09 10 00 02 90 00 02 30 00 00 30
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1584
4 5 6
2 3
1
00 01 20
96
PADAMPUR - 99
00 02 00
91
Contd .
00 00 70
87/639
00 01 10
2
00 04 40
466
3 RAJGODA - 100
00 02 00
248
00 01 60
247
00 05 60
249
00 09 50
464
00 01 30
251
00 10 60
262
00 00 20
463
00 05 60
262/607
00 08 50
263
00 00 20
264
00 08 30
267
00 06 50
266
00 07 00
274
00 05 30
273
00 05 70
272
00 03 50
284
00 04 40
283
00 00 20
287
00 01 20
288
00 01 80
290
00 00 20
289
00 02 70
291
00 05 40
298
00 00 90
296
00 05 50
295/596
00 00 50
295
00 00 50
56
00 00 40
55
00 00 40
54
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1585
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
4
5
6
RAJGODA - 100
304
00
01
70
Contd...
00
305
04
80
307
00
04
70
310
00
04
40
45
00
04
10
[ F. No. R- 25011 /27/2012 -O.R. - I ]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 515. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में पारादीप (उड़ीसा) से दुर्गापुर ( पश्चिम बंगाल) तक वाया हल्दिया एलपीजी गैस परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस.सी. सरकार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस. (प्रशासनिक) सेवानिवृत्त सक्षम प्राधिकारी , पारादीप - हल्दिया दुर्गापुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप - हल्दिया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन ऑगमेंटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल मौरी , मौरीग्राम हावड़ा-711 302 (पश्चिम बंगाल) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /FHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1586
अनुसूची
राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल
जिला : वर्द्धमान
पुलिस स्टेशन : गल्सी
क्षेत्रफल
मौजा का नाम
वर्ग मी.
हेक्टेयर एयर
कम सं.
खसरा सं.
(आर.एस.)
3 4 5 6
1 2
1 साटीनंन्दी 5782 00 06 30
114
5780 00 03 10
5770 00 03 80
5771 00 05 80
5761 00 00 80
5772 00 01 00
5710 00 04 20
5747 00 03 70
5746 00 04 20
5714 00 03 40
5715 00 04 60
5720 00 00 40
5748 00 00 20
5718 00 05 30
5719 00 02 80
2 बेलग्राम 117 3286 00 05 30
3288 00 03 50
3289 00 00 90
3293 00 03 70
3294 00 03 40
00 04 00
3260/4094
3257 00 00 60 3260 00 07 20 3248 00 04 20 3245 00 03 50 3243 00 03 60 3240 00 02 80 3241 00 03 40 3206 00 03 80 3207 00 03 50
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2
3
बेलग्राम 117 3208
जारी.....
3209
3181
3182
3184
3185
3188
3187
3030
3031
3032
3033
3038
3037
3039
3040
3044
3065
3045
3053
3054
783
782
781
777
771
766
767
758
759
749
750
753
751
1587
[ PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
1588 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 5 6
2 3
1 4 5
6
752 00 00 40
बेलग्राम 117 00
02 40
746 00 05 20
जारी..... 00 07 20
00 02 40
742
00 10 10
00 04 10
692
00 04 90
00 05 40
691
00 02 80
00 01 40
689
00 01 70
00 02 20
688
00 01 00
00 10 80
686
00 03 10
00 00 50
687
00 02 90
00 04 30
682
00 02 70
00 03 00
683
00 00 80
00 01 00
624
00 01 60
00 14 80
625
00 01 70
00 11 60
649
00 02 10
00 02 50
647
00 05 10
00 01 70
646
00 03 30
00 04 70
645
00 04 50
00 07 10
644
00 00
40
00 00 20
643
00 07 90
00 00 20
642
00 01 50
560 00 01 70
00 02 60
00 00 70
576
00 03 10
573 00 07 00
00 01 40
00 06 90
574
00 01 70
00 04 20
388
00 02 30
00 02 80
389
00 00 40
00 02 50
392
00 02 40
00 00 90
393
00 01 10
00 03 50
394
00 01 90
00 03 00
395
00 01 80
398 00 01 80
00 01 90
399 00 01 80
00 01 30
00 01 70
405
00 00 20
00 04 20
265
00 00 40
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1589
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
बेलग्राम 117
381
जारी.....
272
275
278
277
224
224/803
223
225
226
229
230
200/814
203/815
203
163
138
143
144
145
161
3 सॉको 119
6680
6669/7515
6679
6669/7514
6677
6678
6676
6675
6751
6748
6749
6750
6772 4
5
6
00
02
30
00
08
40
00
06
40
00
00
30
00
03
80
60
00
09
00
10
20
00
03
30
00
02
10
00
02
40
00
03
50
00
03
50
00
02
80
00
00
40
00
11
30
00
00
20
00
05
70
00
02
90
.00
03
20
00
00
40
00
01
50
00
03
10
00
01
60
00
01
50
00
01
10
00
02
90
00
02
60
00
00
20
00
04
10
00
08
60
00
00
20
00
00
20
00
05
90
00
00
60 1590
[PART 11 - SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3 1 2
साँको 119
4
5
6
03
00
20
6773/8613
जारी.....
00
20
00
6765/7537
6770 00 08 70
6769 00 07 90
6766 00 06 90
6765 00 07 40
6800 00 04 10
6801 00 07 20
6805 00 02 30
6806 00 01 30
6813 00 00 50
6814 00 00 20
8617 00 09 90
6816 00 00 20
4 खानो 104 9585 00 08 70
9586 00 00 80
9592 00 02 00
9591 00 04 90
9601 00 06 90
9596 00 06 70
9598 00 06 60
9600 00 00 50
9599 00 03 20
9365 00 03 80
9363 00 03 50
5417 00 05 80
5424 00 01 20
5425 00 02 10
5423 00 02 60
5422 00 02 10
5432 00 01 40
5431 00 01 80
5426 00 01 50
5427 00 00 20
[ भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1591
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
खानो 104 5428 00 02 10
जारी..... 5429 00 02 50
5430 00 00 20
5447 00 00 20
5449 00 02 10
5450 00 06 20
5458 00 00 40
5456 00 00 40
5457 00 01 50
5462 00 06 70
5466 00 02 90
5486 00 02 60
5465 00 00 20
5487 00 00 50
5484 00 01 30
5485 00 00 40
00 01
5485/8242
5483 5492 5477 5495 5494 5497 5496 5499 5561 5566 5567 5568 5569 5570 5571 5572
50
00 09 30 00 00 80 00 00 20 00 02 00 00 00 20 00 00 80 00 03 40 00 04 60 00 00 40 00 00 20 00 01 70 00 03 00 00 02 60 00 02 40 00 01 30 00 00 40 00 02 80
5597/8439
651GI/13-7 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11,1934
1592
3 4 5 6
1 2
5648. 00 02 20
खानो 104
5610 00 03 00
जारी.....
00 02 20
5645
00 04 50
5641
00 02 10
5640
5639 00 02 40
5637 00 03 30
00 04 00
5636
5627 00 05 50
00 05 00
5628
5695 00 00 50
00 02 70
5696
5693 00 04 00
00 06 40
5697
5691 00 00 20
5690 00 02 20
5689 00 00 60
5682 00 01 20
5683 00 00 50
5685 00 00 50
5686 00 00 60
5680 00 03 20
00 00 40
5679
7802 00 01 20
7806 00 07 90
7814 00 00 90
7812 00 00 20
00 01 30
7811
7808 00 02 10
7810 00 03 70
00 00 40
7809
00 01 20
7848/8435
00 06 20
7848
00 01 80
7848/8403
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1593
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
7866 खानो 104
7867 जारी.....
7863
7872
7862
7873
7877
7878
7879 4
5
6
00
04
00
00
00
40
00
02
10
01
00
80
00
01
80
00
00
80
00
04
20
00
00
20
00
04
00
02
00
90
7881/8406
7880 00 02 00
7881 00 00 40
7903 00 06 80
7902 00 04 50
00 03 20
7922/8434
7921 00 03 70
7922 00 00 20
00 07 20
7922/8411
7925 00 00 20
7926 00 00 70
00 04 80
7926/8415
00
03
80
7926./8412
00
00
20
7926/8413
7927 00 01 60
5 उड़ा 102 1 00 01 90
2 00 01 30
36 00 16 00
37 00 00 80
77 00 03 30
78 00 03 10
79 00 04 60
80 00 01 10
81 00 02 50
82 00 01 10
1594
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
उड़ा 102 83 00 02 80
जारी..... 91 00 00 80
439 00 03 50
225 00 05 10
224 00 10 20
227 00 00 30
223 00 02 10
222 00 00 50
6 सारूल 101 136 00 01 30
104 00 03 90
105 00 00 60
100 00 06 50
101 00 05 10
97 00 05 10
98 00 04 50
79 00 04 10
78 00 03 70
74 00 01 50
80 00 01 60
73 00 01 00
244 00 02 60
245 00 05 10
246 00 00 90
00 03 90
246/1619
247 00 00 30 250 00 01 60 248 00 03 00 248/1620 00 03 50 261 00 04 10 260 00 07 30 289 00 01 00 290 00 02 00 290/1622 00 04 00 311/1623 00 04 30
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1595
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
सारूल 101 312 00 00 20
जारी..... 320 00 01 70
311 00 02 30.
225 00 01 70
326 00 00 70
325 00 06 00
405 00 03 60
406 00 02 40
407 00 02 80
402 00 05 50
395 00 03 20
394 00 03 60
396 00 00 20
390 00 04 30
383 00 03 60
382 00 03 00
376 00 02 00
375 00 03 40
7 गल्सी 64 195 00 03 30
185 00 03 80
184/7091 00 03 60
183 00 03 40
181 00 04 80
180 00 04 60
179 00 01 60
176 00 04 80
175 00 04 50
174 00 00 20
222/7096 00 01 20
222/7095 00 01 80
222 00 02 10
222/7094 00 01 80
222/7093 00 01 90
227 00 02 70
[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1596
3
1
2
228 गल्सी 64
231
जारी.....
233
232
216
153
6
5
4
00
00
03
90
00
03
50
05
00
00
20
00
00
20
00
10
05
00
00
80
00
152/457
151 00 05 20
252 00 04 00
253 00 03 20
00 02 00
4413/4452
4413 00 07 00
4407 00 00 20
4408 00 00 30
4409 00 04 40
4410 00 05 90
4397 00 05 60
4420 00 00 20
4398 00 00 50
4396 00 07 00
4330 00 01 90
4331 00 04 90
4333 00 03 60
4340 00 00 70
4334 00 05 30
4337 00 01 30
4335 00 04 30
4264 00 00 20
4263 00 02 70
4200 00 01 90
00 04 00
4201
4205 00 . 01 50
4204 00 01 00
4206 00 00 60
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1597
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
4207
गल्सी 64
जारी.....
4208
4209
4216
4219 4
5
6
00
01
50
00
01
40
01
00
30
00
03
80
00
01
60
00
00
70
4219/4524
4220 00 00 90
4195 00 03 30
3345 00 00 60
3951 00 01 70
3952 00 08 50
3953 00 03 60
3950 00 04 10
3954 00 04 20
00 02 80
3954/4523
3955 00 00 20 3948 00 04 30 3405 00 06 60 3406 00 03 60 3407 00 08 50 3450 00 02 80 3448 00 01 60 3447 00 01 30 3441 00 03 80 3419 00 01 30 3420 00 02 20 3440 00 00 20 3421 00 00 40 3423 00 02 70 3412 00 00 20 3424 00 02 80 2833 00 00 20 2832 00 02 40 2831 00 04 20
[PART II -SFC . 3 ( ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1598
3
2
1
3425
गल्सी 64
2830
जारी.....
2829
3481
2828
2818
2815
2783
2782
2784
6
5
4
20
00
00
40
00
00
40
00
05
02
80
00
00
30
00
20
00
02
90
00
03
60
05
00
03
00
00
02
90
00
05
00
30
2782/4476
2725 00 00 20
2787 : 00 00 40
2724 00 07 00
2717 00 09 60
2718 00 01 60
2716 00 02 10
2715 00 00 20
2714 00 03 70
00 04 80
2734/4474
1214 00 05 90
8 बाबला 63
1211 00 01 90
1191 00 05 10
1192 00 02 80
1194 00 00 20
1193 00 05 50
1140 00 00 70
1139 00 03 80
1138 00 02 50
1135 00 04 10
1136 0 04 00
1134 CC 00 40
1133 00 01 60
1131 00 03 60
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1599
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
बाबला 63
1104
जारी.....
1101
1100 4
5
6
00
02
40
00
04
10
00
03
10
00
03
1076/1766
1103 1075 1072 1074
00
00 03 40 00 01 80 00 00 50 00 01 70
00
642/1822
02 50
641 00 01 40
640 00 04 80
638 00 00 70
637 00 05 50
636 00 02 70
627 00 03
10
617 00 00 30
406 00 07 40
407 00 01 90
408 00 05 30
00 00
410/1799
411 414 417 416 418 394 419 424 486 484 485 482 492 480
651 GI /13-8
60
00 00 30 00 03 60 00 04 80 00 00 20 00 04 90 00 03 70 00 01 90 00 00 20 00 04 00 00 04 80 00 05 30 00 00 90 00 00 60 00 03 40
PARI 11 SEC. 3 ( ⅱ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11. 1934
A 5 6
1 2 3
479 00 02 70
63
477 00 05 10
जारी....
457 00 07 20
455 10 30
451 00 00 90
456 00 02 20
454 00 02 60
453 00 00 20
4963 00 04 30
9 गोलग्राम 54
4962 00 04 60
4964 00 06 65
4957 00 05 70
4970 00 05 70
4993 00 07 80
5000 00 02 00
5001 GO 04 50
5002 01 80
5016 00 05 70
5022 00 05 20
5023 00 05 30
5025 00 03 30
5026 00 03 30
5051 00 06 50
5052 00 04 90
5055 00 02 20
5054 00 00 20
5056/9755 00 02 30
5088 00 00 20
5063/9757 00 07 30
5063 00 00 30
5064 00 11 50
5067 10 02 00
5066 00 00 20
5069 00 01 30
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1601
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
3
2
1
5068
54
गोलग्राम
6
5
4
00
20
00
30
00
03
5070/9758
जारी.....
5070 00 00 50
00 04 00
4895/9743
4896 00 00 60
4894 00 01 30
4880 00 01 20
4864 00 03 10
4863 00 02 00
00 00 20
4865/9736
4865 00 05 60
00 00 70
4865/9738
4866 00 07 10
4857 00 00 20
4850 00 03 40
00 03 10
4856/9733
20
00
00
4851/9731
4851 00 05 10
4830 00 03 90
00 02 60
4830/7238
5374 00 03 90 4818 00 00 40 4822 00 00 20 4823 00 06 70 4825 00 00 90 4802 00 00 40 4824 00 03 90 1518 00 01 60 1519 00 01 80 1520 00 00 20 1517 00 04 70 1500 00 13 20 1501 00 02 00 1502 00 02 50
1602
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( 日) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
गोलग्राम 54 1493 00 00 70
जारी..... 1480 00 02 40
1481 00 04 20
1482 00 02 60
1451 00 00 40
1469 00 02 10
1483 00 00 20
1450 00 02 40
1467 00 05 90
1105 00 04 50
1402 00 04 10
1398 00 01 10
1401 00 03 10
1399 00 04 90
1152 00 04 70
1151 00 00 50
1150 00 01 80
1155 00 01 30
1149 00 01 10
1145 00 01 80
1156 00 00 30
1144 00 04 80
1158 00 06 10
1174 00 00 30
1173 00 09 40
1185 00 03 70
1184 00 08 90
1186 00 00 20
1222 00 05 50
1221 00 01 00
00 04 00
1221/1774
1220 00 05 00 1219 00 03 00 1206 00 02 10-
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
गोलग्राम 54
1205/1729
जारी.....
1197
1200
1205
1202
1201
2306
2307
2330
2305
2331
2329
2332
2328
2312
2315
2325
2324
2323
2318
2319
2317
2316
2287
2288
2286
2369
2370
2285
2371
2372
2373
2374
2232
1603
4
5
6
00
02
30
00
02
20
00
03
70
00
00
20
00
02
90
00
06
20
00
00
70
00
00
20
00
05
60
00
06
20
00
06
90
00
07
10
00
00
20
00
01
10
00
00
20
00
10
80
00
11
00
00
10
70
00
01
20
00
02
60
00
02
90
00
02
50
00
07
30
00
00
30
00
06
70
00
13
30
00
01
70
00
02
00
00
02
50
00
00
80
00
02
20
00
03
70
00
03
40
00
00
00 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1604
3
2
1
2386
गोलग्राम 54
2388
जारी.....
2395
2394
2401
2397
2400
2398
2409
221
10 पुरषा 50
220
219
218
217
216
215
213
212
169
168
199
198
196
171
195
194
172
173
178
179
180
177
181
182
6
5
4
30
06
00
90
09
00
70
05
00
60
02
00
80
11
00
00
04
00
70
04
00
20
00
00
40
06
00
90
04
00
70
01
00
20
03
00
40
02
00
40
01
00
50
09
00
00
01
00
20
01
00
10
01
00
20
10
00
00
03
00
60
00
00
80
00
00
10
01
00
50
02
00
30
01
00
60
01
00
00
01
00
70
02
00
70
02
00
00
02
00
40
01
00
70
02
00
20
01
00
50
00
00 [ भाग 1 ]---खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1605
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
50 176 00 03 40
पुरषा
जारी.. 100 00 01 60
160 00 01 50
167 00 14 30
159 00 00 20
11 कोलकोल 51 2206 00 09 50
2213 00 00 60
2209 00 05 20
2212 00 03 30
2210 00 02 70
2223 00 07 70
2232 00 07 00
2231 00 03 00
2236 00 06 00
2237 00 06 20
2239 00 02 १०
3589 00 03 90
3588 00 05 00
3593 00 01 70
3594 00 05 70
3595 00 05 50
3596 00 02 80
3607 00 03 60
12 पाराज 9 62 00 01 40
93 00 12 60
95 00 05 40
97 00 06 20
97/7025 00 02 00
105 00 04 00
105/7030 00 01 30
109 00 05 70
106 00 00 30
108 00 01 90
281/927 00 03 30
281/7049 00 01 40
281 00 00 30
1606
PART 11 SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3
2
1
264 पाराज 9 (जारी....)
1665 13 झाडुल 7
1664
1663
1667
1662
1661
1651
1646
1645
1627/2060
6
5
4
00
00
60
05
50
00
90
00
02
00
02
90
90
00
02
00
05
00
07
40
00
00
20
04
02
00
20
00
40
00
00
00
90
[फा. सं. आर-25011/19/2012- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2013
S.O. 515.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur ( West Bengal ) Via Haldia a pipeline should be laid in State of WestBengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited. And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C.Sarkar. W.B.C.S ( Exe . ) Retd . Competent Authority Paradip - Haldia -Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip - Haldia -Barauni Pipeline Project , P.O , Duillya , Andul - Mouri Mourigram , Howrah . 711-302 (West Bengal ) भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
SCHEDULE
PS : GALSI
1607
DISTRICT : BURDWAN
SI .
Khasra No.
Name of the Mouza
No.
(R.S)
1 2
3
1 SATI NANDI - 114 5782
5780
5770
5771
5761
5772
5710
5747
5746
5714
5715
5720
5748
5718
5719
2 BELGRAM - 117 3286
3288
3289
3293
3294
3260/4094
3257
3260
3248
3245
3243
3240
3241
3206
3207
651 Gl/13-9
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
4 5 6
00 06 30
00 03 10
00 03 80
00 05 80
00 00 80
00 01 00
00 04 20
00 03 70
00 04 20
00 03 40
00 04 60
00 00 40
00 00 20
00 05 30
00 02 80
00 05 30
00 03 50
00 00 90
00 03 70
00 03 40
00 04 00
00 00 60
00 07 20
00 04 20
00 03 50
00 03 60
00 02 80
00 03 40
00 03 80
00 03 50
1608
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
BELGRAM - 117 3208 00 02 40
Contd... 3209 00 07 20
3181 00 10 10
3182 00 04 90
3184 00 02 80
3185 00 01 70
3188 00 01 00
3187 00 03 10
3030 00 02 90
3031 00 02 70
3032 00 00 80
3033 00 01 60
3038 00 01 70
3037 00 02 10
3039 00 05 10
3040 00 03 30
3044 00 04 50
3065 00 00 40
3045 00 07 90
3053 00 01 50
3054 00 02 60
783 00 03 10
782 00 01 40
781 00 01 70
777 00 02 30
771 00 00 40
766 00 02 40
767 00 01 10
758 00 01 90
759 00 01 80
749 00 01 90
750 00 01 30
753 00 00 20
751 00 00 40
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1609
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4
5 6
BELGRAM - 117 752 00 00 40
Contd... 746 00 05 20
742 00 02 40
692 00 04 10
691 00 05 40
689 00 01 40
688 00 02 20
686 00 10 80
687 00 00 50
682 00 04 30
683 00 03 00
624 00 01 00
625 00 14 80
649 00 11 60
647 00 02 50
646 00 01 70
645 00 04 70
644 00 07 10
643 00 00 20
642 00 00 20
560 00 01 70
576 00 00 70
573 00 07 00
574 00 06 90
388 00 04 20
389 00 02 80
392 00 02 50
393 00 00 90
394 00 03 50
395 00 03 00
398 00 01 80
399 00 01 80
405 00 01 70
265 00 04 20
1610
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3
BELGRAM - 117 381
272
275
278
277
224
224/803
223
225
226
229
230
203/814
203/815
203
163
138
143
144
145
161
3 SANKO - 119 6680
[PART 11 - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
4 5 6 00 02 30 00 08 40 00 06 40 00 00 30 00 03 80 00 09 30 00 10 20 00 03 30 00 02 10 00 02 40 00 03 50 00 03 50 00 02 80 00 00 40 00 11 30 00 00 20 00 05 70 00 02 90 00 63 20 00 00 40 00 01 50 00 03 10
60
6669/7515
6679 00
01
00
01
50
6669/7514
00 01 10
6677 00 02 90
6678 00 02 60
6676 00 00 20
6675 00 04 10
6751 00 08 60
6748 00 00 20
6749 00 00 20
6750 00 05 90
6772 00 00 60
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1611
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
SANKO - 119
6773/8613
Contd..
4
5
6
00
03
20
00
6765/7537
00 20
6770 00 08 70
6769 00 07 90
6766 00 06 90
6765 00 07 40
6800 00 04 10
6801 00 07 20
6805 00 02 30
6806 00 01 30
6813 00 00 50
6814 00 00 20
8617 00 09 90
6816 00 00 20
4 KHANO- 104 9585 00
08 70
9586 00 00 80
9592 00 02 00
9591 00 04 90
9601 00 06 90
9596 00 06 70
9598 00 06 60
9600 00 00 50
9599 00 03 20
9365 00 03 80
9363 00 03 50
5417 00 05 80
5424 00 01 20
5425 00 02 10
5423 00 02 60
5422 00 02 10
5432 00 01 40
5431 00 01 80
5426 00 01 50
5427 00 00 20
1612
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 5 6
3
1 2
00 02 10
5428
KHANO - 104
00 02 50
5429
Contd...
00 00 20
5430
00 00 20
5447
00 02 10
5449
00 06 20
5450
00 00 40
5458
00 00 40
5456
5457 00 01 50
00 06 70
5462
00 02 90
5466
00 02 60
5486
00 00 20
5465
00 00 50
5487
00 01 30
5484
00 00 40
5485
00 01 50
5485/8242
00 09 30
5483
5492 00 00 80
00 00 20
5477
00 02 00
5495
00 00 20
5494
00 00 80
5497
00 03 40
5496
00 04 60
5499
00 00 40
5561
00 00 20
5566
00 01 70
5567
00 03 00
5568
00 02 60
5569
00 02 40
5570
00 01 30
5571
00 00 40
5572
00 02 80
5597/8439
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1613
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
KHANO - 104 5648 00 02 20
Contd ... 5610 00 03 00
5645 00 02 20
5641 00 04 50
5640 00 02 10
5639 00 02 40
5637 00 03 30
5636 00 04 00
5627 00 05 50
5628 00 05 00
5695 00 00 50
5696 00 02 70
5693 00 04 00
5697 00 06 40
5691 00 00 20
5690 00 02 20
5689 00 00 60
5682 00 01 20
5683 00 00 50
5685 00 00 50
5686 00 00 60
5680 00 03 20
5679 00 00 40
7802 00 01 20
7806 00 07 90
7814 00 00 90
7812 00 00 20
7811 00 01 30
7808 00 02 10
7810 00 03 70
7809 00 00 40
7848/8435 00 01 20
7848 00 06 20
7848/8403 00 01 80
1614
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
KHANO - 104 7866 00 04 00
Contd ... 7867 00 00 40
7863 00 02 10
7872 00 01 80
7862 00 01 80
7873 00 00 80
7877 00 04 20
7878 00 00 20
7879 00 04 00
7881/8406 00 02 90
7880 00 02 00
7881 00 00 40
7903 00 06 80
7902 00 04 50
7922/8434 00 03 20
7921 00 03 70
7922 00 00 20
00 07 20
7922/8411
7925 00 00 20
7926 00 00 70
7926/8415 00 04 80
7926/8412 00 03 80
7926/8413 00 00 20
7927 00 01 60
5 URA - 102 1 00 01 90
2 00 01 30
36 00 16 00
37 00 00 80
77 00 03 30
78 00 03 10
79 00 04 60
80 00 01 10
81 00 02 50
82 00 01 10
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1615
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
URA - 102 83
Contd... 91
439
225
224
227
223
222
6 SARUL - 101 136
104
105
100
101
97
98
79
78
74
80
73
244
245
246
246/1619
247
250
248
248/1620
261
260
289
290
4
5
6
00 02 80 00 00 80 00 03 50 00 05 10 00 10 20 00 00 30 00 02 10 00 00 50 00 01 30 00 03 90 00 00 60 00 06 50 00 05 10 00 05 10 00 04 50 00 04 10 00 03 70 00 01 50 00 01 60 00 01 00 00 02 60 00 05 10 00 00 90 00 03 90 00 00 30 00 01 60 00 03 00 00 03 50 00 04 10 00 07 30 00 01 00 00 02 00
290/1622
311/1623
651GI/13-10
00 04 00 00. 04 30
[PART 11 -- SEC . 3 (ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1616
5 6
3 4
2
00 00 20
312
SARUL- 101
00 01 70
320
00 02 30
311
00 01 70
225
00 00 70
326
00 06 00
325
00 03 60
405
00 02 40
406
00 02 80
407
00 05 50
402
00 03 20
395
00 03 60
394
00 00 20
396
00 04 30
390
00 03 60
383
00 03 00
382
00 02 00
376
00 03 40
375
00 03 30
195
7 GALSI - 64
00 03 80
185
00 03 60
184/7091
00 03 40
183
00 04 80
181
00 04 60
180
00 01 60
179
00 04 80
176
00 04 50
175
00 00 20
174
00 01 20
222/7096
00 01 80
222/7095
00 02 10
222
00 01 80
222/7094
00 01 90
222/7093
00 02 70
227
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1617
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
GALSI - 64 228 00 03 00
Contd... 231 00 03 90
233 00 05 50
232 00 00 20
216 00 00 20
153 00 05 10
152/457 00 00 80
151 00 05 20
252 00 04 00
253 00 03 20
4413/4452 00 02 00
4413 00 07 00
4407 00 00 20
4408 00 00 30
4409 00 04 40
4410 00 05 90
4397 00 05 60
4420 00 00 20
4398 00 00 50
4396 00 07 00
4330 00 01 90
4331 00 04 90
4333 00 03 60
4340 00 00 70
4334 00 05 30
4337 00 01 30
4335 00 04 30
4264 00 00 20
4263 00 02 70
4200. 00 01 90
4201 00 04 00
4205 00 01 50
4204 00 01 00
4206 00 00 60
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii))
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1618
3
2
1
4207
GALSI - 64
4208
Contd...
4209
4216
4219
6
4
5
50
01
00
40
01
00
30
01
00
80
03
00
01
60
00
70
00
00
4219/4524
4220 00 00 90
00 03 30
4195
00 00 60
3345
00 01 70
3951
00 08 50
3952
00 03 60
3953
00 04 10
3950
00 04 20
3954
00 02 80
3954/4523
00 OC 20
3955
00 04 30
3948
00 06 60
3405
3406 00 03 60
3407 00 08 50
3450 00 02 80
3448 00 01 60
00 01 30
3447
00 03 80
3441
00 01 30
3419
00 02 20
3420
00 00 20
3440
00 00 40
3421
00 02 70
3423
00 00 20
3412
00 02 80
3424
2833 00 00 20
00 02 40
2832
00 04 20
2831
[भाग I-खण्ड 3 ( ii )
1619
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4
5 6
GALSI- 64 3425 00 00 20
Contd... 2830 00 00 40
2829 00 05 40
3481 00 02 80
2828 00 00 30
2818 00 02 20
2815 00 03 90
2783 00 05 60
2782 00 03 00
2784 00 02 90
2782/4476 00 05 30
2725 00 00 20
2787 00 00 40
2724 00 07 00
2717 00 09 60
2718 00 01 60
2716 00 02 10
2715 00 00 20
2714 00 03 70
2734/4474
00 04 80
8 BABLA - 63 1214 00 05
90
1211 00 01 90
1191 00 05 10
1192 00 02 80
1194 00 00 20
1193 00 05 50
1140 00 00 70
1139 00 03 80
1138 00 02 50
1135 00 04 10
1136 00 04 00
1134 00 00 40
1133 00 01 60
1131 00 03 60
1620
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3 4 5 6
1 2
1104 00 02 40
BABLA - 63
Contd... 1101 00 04 10
1100 00 03 10
1076/1766 00 03 00
1103 00 03 40
1075 00 01 80
1072 00 00 50
1074 00 01 70
642/1822 00 02 50
641 00 01 40
640 00 04 80
638 00 00 70
637 00 05 50
636 00 02 70.
627 00 03 10
617 00 00 30
406 00 07 40
407 00 01 90
408 00 05 30
410/1799 00 00 60
411 00 00 30
414 00 03 60
417 00 04 80
416 00 00 20
418 00 04 90
394 00 03 70
419 00 01 90
424 00 00 20
486 00 04 00
484 00 04 80
485 00 05 30
482 00 00 90
492 00 00 60
480 00 03 40
[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1621
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
4 5 6
1 2 3
479 00 02 70
BABLA - 63
477 00 05 10
Contd ...
457 00 07 20
455 00 04 30
451 00 00 90
456 00 02 20
454 00 02 60
453 00 00 20
4963 00 04 30
9 GOLGRAM - 54
4962 00 04 60
4964 00 06 65
4967 00 05 70
4970 00 05 70
4993 00 07 80
5000 00 02 00
5001 00 04 50
5002 00 01 80
5016 00 05 70
5022 00 05 20
5023 00 05 30
5025 00 03 30
5026 00 03 30
5051 00 06 50
5052 00 04 90
5055 00 02 20
5054 00 00 20
5056/9755 00 02 30
5088 00 00 20
00 07 30
5063/9757
5063 00 00 30 5064 00 11 50 5067 00 02 00 5066 00 00 20 5069 00 01 30
1622
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013/ PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
2
1
3
GOLGRAM - 54
5068
Contd...
5070/9758
5070
4895/9743
4896
4894
4880
4864
4863
4865/9736
4865
4865/9738
4866
4857
4850
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) )
4
5
6
00
00
20
00
03
30
00
00
50
00
04
00
00
60
00
00
01
30
00
01
20
00
03
10
00
02
00
00
00
20
00
05
60
00
70
00
00
07
10
00
00
20
00
03
40
00
4856/9733
03 10
4851/9731 00 00 20
4851 00 05 10
4830 00 03 90
4830/7238 00 02 60
5374 00 03 90
4818 00 00 40
4822 00 00 20
4823 00 06 70
4825 00 00 90
4802 00 00 40
4824 00 03 90
1518 00 01 60
1519 00 01 80
1520 00 00 20
1517 00 04 70
1500 00 13 20
1501 00 02 00
1502 00 02 50
1623
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11, 1934
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1 2 3
GOLGRAM - 54 1493
Contd... 1480
1481
1482
1451
1469
1483
1450
1467
1105
1402
1398
1401
1399
1152
1151
1150
1155
1149
1145
1156
1144
1158
1174
1173
1185
1184
1186
1222
1221
1221/1774
1220
1219
1206
651GI /13-11
4 5 6 00 00 70 00 02 40 00 04 20 00 02 60 00 00 40 00 02 10 00 00 20 00 02 40 00 05 90 00 04 50 00 04 10 00 01 10 00 03 10 00 04 90 00 04 70 00 00 50 00 01 80 00 01 30 00 01 10 00 01 80 00 00 30 00 04 80 00 06 10 00 00 30 00 09 40 00 03 70 00 08 90 00 00 20 00 05 50 00 01 00 00 04 00 00 05 00 00 03 00 00 02 10
1624
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2
3
GOLGRAM- 54 1205/1729
Contd... 1197
1200
1205
1202
1201
2306
2307
2330
2305
2331
2329
2332
2328
2312
2315
2325
2324
2323
2318
2319
2317
2316
2287
2288
2286
2369
2370
2285
2371
2372
2373
2374
2232
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]
4 5 6 00 02 30 00 02 20 00 03 70 00 00 20 00 02 90 00 06 20 00 00 70 00 00 20 00 05 60 00 06 20 00 06 90 00 07 10 00 00 20 00 01 10 00 00 20 00 10 80 00 11 00 00 10 70 00 01 20 00 02 60 00 02 90 00 02 50 00 07 30 00 00 30 00 06 70 00 13 30 00 01 70 00 02 00 00 02 50 00 00 80 00 02 20 00 03 70 00 03 40 00 00
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1625
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
GOLGRAM - 54 2386 00 06 30
Contd ... 2388 00 09 90
2395 00 05 70
2394 00 02 60
2401 00 11 80
2397 00 04 00
2400 00 04 70
2398 00 00 20
2409 00 06 40
10 PURSHA - 50 221 00 04 90
220 00 01 70
219 00 03 20
218 00 02 40
217 00 01 40
216 00 09 50
215 00 01 00
213 00 01 20
212 00 01 10
169 00 10 20
168 00 03 00
199 00 00 60
198 00 00 80
196 00 01 10
171 00 02 50
195 00 01 30
194 00 01 60
172 00 01 00
173 00 02 70
178 00 02 70
179 00 02 00
180 00 01 40
177 00 02 70
181 00 01 20
182 00 00 50
1626
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
2 3 4 5 6
1
PURSHA - 50 176 00 03 40
Contd ... 100 00 01 60
160 00 01 50
167 00 14 30
159 00 00 20
2206 00 09 50
11 KOL KOL - 51
2213 00 00 60
2209 00 05 20
2212 00 03 30
2210 00 02 70
2223 00 07 70
2232 00 07 00
2231 00 03 00
2236 00 06 00
2237 00 06 20
2239 00 02 80
3589 00 03 90
3588 00 05 00
3593 00 01 70
3594 00 05 70
3595 00 05 50
3596 00 02 80
3607 00 03 60
12 PARAJ - 9 62 00 01 40
93 00 12 60
95 00 05 40
97 00 06 20
97/7025 00 02 00
105 00 04 00
105/7030 00 01 30
109 00 05 70
106 00 00 30
108 00 01 90
281/927 00 03 30
281/7049 00 01 40
281 00 00 30
1627
भारत का राजपत्र': मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4 5 6
1 2 3
264 00 00 60
PARAJ - 9 ( Contd ... )
1665 00 05 50
13 JHARUL - 7
1664 00 02 90
1663 00 02 90
1667 00 02 90
1662 00 05 00
1661 00 07 40
1651 00 04 20
1646 00 02 20
1645 00 00 40
1627/2060 00 00 90
[ F. No. R- 25011 / 19/2012 -O.R. - I ]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 22 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 516.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में पारादीप (उड़ीसा) से दुर्गापुर (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक वाया हल्दिया एलपीजी 'गैस परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए:
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक. प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस.सी. सरकार, डब्ल्यू. बी . सी . एस. (प्रशासनिक) सेवानिवृत्त सक्षम प्राधिकारी , पारादीप हल्दिया दुर्गापुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप - हल्दिया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन ऑगमेंटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल मौरी , मौरीग्राम हावड़ा -711 302 (पश्चिम बंगाल) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
1628
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
जिला: वर्द्धमान
पुलिस स्टेशन : गल्सी
मौजा का नाम
कम सं.
राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
एयर वर्ग मी.
खसरा सं .
(एल.आर.)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 कुड़मुना 115 220 00 04 30
221 00 03 70
223 00 04 10
217 00 00 70
224 00 05 10
215 00 01 90
214 00 00 20
213 00 02 20
212 00 09 10
208 00 04 60
188 00 06 60
187 00 07 10
186 00 06 70
37 00 07 40
36 00 02 60
50 00 05 40
51 00 05 80
60 00 01 60
59 00 03 70
62 00 07 90
63 00 03 60
74 00 03 00
77 00 02 70
2 चन्दनपुर 116 89 00 01 90
88 00 00 20
96 00 00 20
90 00 03 50
95 00 08 00
97 00 00 30
98 00 00 20
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1629.
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
चन्दनपुर 116 112 00 02 90
जारी..... 111 00 02 40
107 00 00 90
110 00 04 70
109 00 00 50
133 00 03 20
134 00 03 60
138 00 03 20
140 00 01 40
141 00 03 50
142 00 04 60
40 00 02 80
39 00 02 80
41 00 00 20
38 00 01 40
25 00 04 00
24 00 10 00
3 चकमुड़िया 103 754 00 03 60
757 00 07 30
759 00 00 70
758 00 04 00
783 00 05 30
786 00 06 10
976 00 01 10
977 00 01 70
00 02
975/1224
978 971 975 979 980 982 983 989
10
00 05 10 00 05 20 00 00 90 00 07 70 00 04 50 00 01 00 00 01 00 00 04 70
1630
[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 5 6
2 3
1
00 01 20
चक्मुड़िया 103 988
987 00 00 50
जारी.....
985 00 02 80
990 00 00 20
1025 00 06 80
1026 00 06 10
1034 00 07 70
1036 00 01 30
1037 00 05 40
1038 00 06 70
1103 00 02 80
1101 00 01 10
1104 00 00 20
00 00 20
1104/1246
1100 00 01 60
1105 00 03 80
1106 00 01 40
1109 00 07 40
848 00 01 20
4 जोतकोलकोल 8
847 00 08 90
753 00 07 50
846 00 00 20
754 00 06 30
727 00 02 40
755 00 02 20
756 00 03 40
725 00 00 20
726 00 00 20
723 00 01 50
722 00 01 10
724 00 00 80
621 00 09 30
620 00 00 20
622 00 08 60
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
1631
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
3
2
1
614
जोतकोलकोल 8
609
जारी.....
604
357
356
358
354
349
361
6
4
5
60
00
03
60
08
00
04
60
00
90
04
00
70
00
00
00
02
00
01
60
00
30
06
00
10
00
02
50
00
00
348/364
350 341 339 308 306 309 312 276 277 278 281 282 284 285 266 264 261 240 232 231 230 229 33 34
651 GI/13-12
00 04 50 00 02 20 00 05 10 00 03 30 00 05 40 00 03 10 00 05 90 00 05 30 00 04 90 00 04 10 00 00 90 00 04 60 00 06 50 00 04 50 00 03 00 00 01 80 00 05 20 00 00 90 00 05 70 00 10 00 00 01 30 00 00 50 00 03 40 00 04 20
1632
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2
3
राकोना 6 40
जारी..... 71
80
70
65
73
269
270
267
266
265
263
262
367
371
375
377
374
387
372
389
390
391
428
419
427
426
422
423
1088
1823
1822
1839
1838
PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
4 5 6 00 05 40 00 01 80 00 00 30 00 06 00 00 07 30 00 04 20 00 02 70 00 08 50 00 02 80 00 01 10 00 02 80 00 01 70 00 01 90 00 03 60 00 01 70 00 03 80 00 00 90 00 04 40 00 00 70 00 00 30 00 06 80 00 03 50 00 04 50 00 01 30 00 00 20 00 03 20 00 03 50 00 00 20 00 03 10 00 10 00 00 08 80 00 10 50 00 02 10 00 00 20
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1633
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
राकोना 6
1825
जारी.....
1154
1201
1094
1844
1826
1845
1170
1155
1171
6 नूरकोना - 4
4
5
6
00
30
04
00
00
90
00
06
50
00
00
02
00
00
20
00
00
20
00
00
70
00
60
02
00
00
50
00
20
03
00
01
10
14/1371
00
00
50
14/1375
14 00 01 30
46 00 00 90
44 00 01 90
45 00 01 50
43 00 03 10
40 00 01 90
39 00 04 70
38 00 02 50
76 00 04 90
78 00 03 60
75 00 00 90
00 02 80
78/879
77 00 03 70
26 00 09 30
25 00 03 00
24 00 03 40
23 00 02 50
11 00 01 20
84 00 01 10
85 00 03 90
94 00 00 90
00 00 20
87/862
00
00
20
86/863
93 00
01
80
00
89/1439
89 08
20
00
00
80 1634
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3 4 5 6
1 2
नूरकोना - 4 90 00 04 20
जारी..... 1135 00 01 80
1126 00 12 30
1134 00 00 40
1123 00 01 60
1125 00 03 50
1124 00 02 00
1121 00 00 90
1114 00 03 40
1120 00 01 10
1115 00 06 20
1097 00 04 00
1099 00 09 40
1085 00 00 50
958 00 01 70
957 00 02 10
956 00 00 40
955 00 02 90
1110 00 00 20
1098 00 00 20
954 00 01 70
953 00 02 50
951 00 05 50
950 00 00 20
901 00 16 30
948 00 00 20
911 00 00 20
[फा. सं. आर-25011/19/2012- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव 1635
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2013
S.O. 516.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal ) Via Haldia a pipeline should be laid in State of WestBengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) 01 section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C.Sarkar . W.B.C.S (Exe . ) Retd Competent Authority Paradip - Haldia -Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip Haldia -Barauni Pipeline Project , P.O.Duillya, Andul - Mouri , Mourigram , Howrah . 711-302 (West Bengal ) 1636
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
SCHEDULE
P S : GALSI
DISTRICT : BURDWAN
Name of the Mouza
SI . No.
[ PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ]
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Area
Khasra No.
(L.R)
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3
L 4 5 6
1 KURMUNA - 115 220 00
04 30
221 00 03 70
223 00 04 10
217 00 00 70
224 00 05 10
215 00 01 90
214 00 00 20
213 00 02 20
212 00 09 10
208 00 04 60
188 00 06 60
187 00 07 10
186 00 06 70
37 00 07 40
36 00 02 60
50 00 05 40
51 00 05 80
60 00 01 60
59 00 03 70
62 00 07 90
63 00 03 60
74 00 03 00
77 00 02 70
2 CHANDANPUR - 116 89 00 01 90
88 00 00 20
96 00 00 20
90 00 03 50
95 00 08 00
97 00 00 30
98 00 00 20
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1637
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
2 3 4 5 6
1
CHANDANPUR - 116 112 00 02 90
Contd... 111 00 02 40
107 00 00 90
110 00 04 70
109 00 00 50
133 00 03 20
134 00 03 60
138 00 03 20
140 00 01 40
141 00 03 50
142 00 04 60
40 00 02 80
39 00 02 80
41 00 00 20
38 00 01 40
25 00 04 00
24 00 10 00
754 00 03 60
3 CHAKMURIA - 103
757 00 07 30
759 00 00 70
758 00 04 00
783 00 05 30
786 00 06 10
976 00 01 10
977 00 01 70
975/1224 00 02 10
978 00 05 10
971 00 05 20
975 00 00 90
979 00 07 70
980 00 04 50
982 00 01 00
983 00 01 00
989 00 04 70
1638
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3 4 5 6
1 2
988 00 01 20
CHAKMURIA - 103
987 00 00 50
Contd...
985 00 02 80
990 00 00 20
1025 00 06 80
1026 00 06 10
1034 00 07 70
1036 00 01 30
1037 00 05 40
1038 00 06 70
1103 00 02 80
1101 00 01 10
1104 00 00 20
1104/1246 00 00 20
1100 00 01 60
1105 00 03 80
1106 00 01 40
1109 00 07 40
JOT KOL KOL - 8 848 00 01 20
4
847 00 08 90
753 00 07 50
846 00 00 20
754 00 06 30
727 00 02 40
755 00 02 20
756 00 03 40
725 00 00 20
726 00 00 20
723 00 01 50
722 00 01 10
724 00 00 80
621 00 09 30
620 00 00 20
622 00 08 60
1639
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च. 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11, 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2 3
1
JOT KOL KOL - 8 614
Contd... 609
604
357
356
358
354
349
361
348/364
350
341
339
308
306
309
312
276
277
278
281
282
284
285
266
264
261
240
232
231
230
229
33
5 RAKONA - 6
34
651 GI /13-13
4 5 6 00 03 60 00 08 60 00 04 60 00 04 90 00 00 70 00 02 00 00 01 60 00 06 30 00 02 10 00 00 50 00 04 50 00 02 20 00 05 10 00 03 30 00 05 40 00 03 10 00 05 90 00 05 30 00 04 90 00 04 10 00 00 90 00 04 60 00 06 50 00 04 50 00 03 00 00 01 80 00 05 20 00 00 90 00 05 70 00 10 00 00 01 30 00 00 50 00 03 40 00 04 20
1640
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3 4 5 6
3 2
40 00 05 40
RAKONA - 6
71 00 01 80
Contd...
80 00 00 30
70 00 06 00
65 00 07 30
73 00 04 20
269 00 02 70
270 00 08 50
267 00 02 80
266 00 01 10
265 00 02 80
263 00 01 70
262 00 01 90
367 00 03 60
371 00 01 70
375 00 03 80
377 00 00 90
374 00 04 40
387 00 00 70
372 00 00 30
389 00 06 80
390 00 03 50
391 00 04 50
428 00 01 30
419 00 00 20
427 00 03 20
426 00 03 50
422 00 00 20
423 00 03 10
1088 00 10 00
1823 00 08 80
1922 00 10 50
1839 00 02 10
1838 00 00 20
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1641
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
RAKONA - 6 1825 00 04 30
Contd... 1154 00 00 90
1201 00 06 50
1094 00 02 00
1844 00 00 20
1826 00 00 20
1845 00 00 70
1170 00 02 60
1155 00 00 50
1171 00 03 20
6 NURKOΝΑ - 4 14/1371 00 01 10
14/1375 00 00 50
14 00 01 30
46 00 00 90
44 00 01 90
45 00 01 50
43 00 03 10
40 00 01 90
39 00 04 70
38 00 02 50
76 00 04 90
78 00 03 60
75 00 00 90
78/879 00 02 80
77 00 03 70
26 00 09 30
25 00 03 00
24 00 03 40
23 00 02 50
11 00 01 20
84 00 01 10
85 00 03 90
94 00 00 90
87/862 00 00 20
86/863 00 00 20
93 00 01 80
89/1439 00 08 20
89 00 00 80
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1642
3 4 5 6
1 2
90 00 04 20
NURKONA - 4
1135 00 01 80
Contd...
1126 00 12 30
1134 00 00 40
1123 00 01 60
1125 00 03 50
1124 00 02 00
1121 00 00 90
1114 00 03 40
1120 00 01 10
1115 00 06 20
1097 00 04 00
1099 00 09 40
1085 00 00 50
958 00 01 70
957 00 02 10
956 00 00 40
955 00 02 90
1110. 00 00 20
1098 00 00 20
954 00 01 70
953 00 02 50
951 00 05 50
950 00 00 20
901 00 16 30
948 00 00 20
911 00 00 20
[ F. No. R- 25011 / 19/2012 -O.R. - I ]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
1643 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 22 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 517. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में पारादीप (उड़ीसा) से दुर्गापुर (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक वाया हल्दिया एलपीजी गैस परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस.सी. सरकार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस. (प्रशासनिक) सेवानिवृत्त सक्षम प्राधिकारी, पारादीप हल्दिया दुर्गापुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप हल्दिया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन ऑगमेंटेशन योजना, डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल मौरी , मौरीग्राम हावड़ा-711 302 (पश्चिम बंगाल) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
1644
[PART II --SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
अनुसूची
राज्य : पश्चिम बंगाल
जिला: पूर्व मेदिनीपुर
पुलिस स्टेशन: महिषादल
क्षेत्रफल
मौजा का नाम
एयर वर्ग मी.
हेक्टेयर
खसरा सं.
(आर.एस.)
कम सं.
6
5
4
4
2
1
00
00
04
4022
1 लक्ष्या 161
90
00
08
4015
80
02
00
4016
00
03
00
4016/5146
4005 00 02 80
00 02 40
4005/5142
3955 00 04 80
3973 00 00 60
3972 00 01 30
3962 00 01 70
00 02 60
3971
00 03 70
3963/5117
3964 00 00 20
3963 00 00 20
3930 00 00 70
3917 00 10 60
3918 00 00 20
3915 00 04 30
3913 00 04 70
3912 00 02 60
3888 00 00 50
3860 00 00 60
3859/5102 00 02 70
3859 00 03 30
3858 00 00 80
3857 00 01 50
3836 00 02 10
3837 00 04 10
3838 00 01 10
3855 00 02 00
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1645
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 4 4 5 6
लक्ष्या 161 3839 00 01 00
जारी.. 3849 00 14 10
3767 00 03 10
3770 00 00 20
3766 00 00 20
3768 00 04 20
3763 00 03 30
3769 00 00 20
2 कालिकाकून्डू 148 1183 00 03 40
1184 00 09 80
1201 00 04 20
1208 00 00 20
1207 00 01 70
1206 00 01 50
1205 00 01 70
1211 00 02 10
1210 00 02 90
1213 00 02 40
1199 00 00 70
678 00 00 30
677 00 02 00
675 00 03 50
674 00 02 80
673 00 01 30
672 00 01 40
216 00 04 90
671 00 00 20
217 00 01 70
218 00 02 70
219 00 01 40
220 00 01 50
211 00 02 50
210 00 00 90
209 00 01 20
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1646
4 4 5 6
1 2
208 00 04 80
कालिकाकून्डू 148
जारी..... 235 00 00 20
236 00 00 20
207 00 03 60
269 00 00 30
78 00 00 50
79 00 00 70
205 00 07 40
185 00 02 10
182 00 02 10
184 00 02 50
00 02 20
183/3479
183 00 02 50
179 00 02 50
170 00 03 20
171 00 02 30
173 00 00 20
00 01 50
169/3488
172 00 01 30
155 00 05 30
156 00 01 50
56| 00 14 90
3 कान्चनपुर 137
56 00 01 00
339 00 04 30
336/1659 00 00 70
338 00 03 00
325 00 02 20
341 00 01 50
343 00 01 60
324 00 00 40
323 00 00 30
322 00 20
342 00 00 20
89 00 00 20
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1647
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 4 4 5 6
137 90 00 00 20
कान्चनपुर
जारी..... 344 00 02 10
345 00 05 30
348 00 03 40
349. 00 00 20
350 00 00 90
351 00 02 60
352 00 01 50
353 00 00 20
243 00 02 30
244 00 01 70
247 00 01 50
248 00 02 30
250 00 01 30
249 00 00 20
238 00 01 70
237 00 02 90
186 00 01 40
00 01 90
186/1641
185
184
183
182
181
176
179
178
177
163
164
161
158
4 130 1473
राजारामपुर
1474
651GI /13-14
00 01 50 00 01 60 00 03 60 00 00 80 00 00 80 00 01 80 00 00 20 00 01 00 00 00 20 00 03 10 00 01 00 00 00 20 00 03 60 00 04 00 00 02 10
[ PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 4 5 6
2
1469 00 02 10
130
1470 00 00 60
1468 00 10 10
1476 00 01 00
1465 00 05 60
00 00 20
1466/2971
1482 00 00 90
1483 00 01 50
1484 00 05 50
1489 00 06 10
1490 00 01 30
1491 00 09 00
1515 00 02 70
1514 00 07 10
1512 00 02 60
1690 00 01 00
1523 00 06 00
1528 00 05 30
1524 00 04 80
1527 00 00 90
1532 00 00 20
1533 00 00 60
1536 00 00 70
1531 00 01 10
00 01 50
1530/2962
1530 01 30 1529 00 01 90 1556 00 01 90 1559 00 04 40 1560 00 02 30 2863 00 00 40 2864 00 02 00 2860 00 00 80 2865 00 01 30
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
4
2866 राजारामपुर 130
2868 जारी.....
2859
5
4
00
01
00
07
00
00
01
00
2868/2903
2871 00 00 30
2870 00 01 60
5 123 857 00 00 60
मलुबसान
860 00 01 30
859 00 01 00
852 00 02 70
850 00 00 80
849 00 03 00
847 00 04 30
803 00 03 10
802 00 01 90
806 00 01 00
801 00 03 00
800 00 01 80
799 00 02 50
714 00 03 60
713 00 02 90
712 00 03 80
717 00 00 40
710 00 03 00
709 00 00 20
702 00 03 80
703 00 00 30
685 00 05 50
686 00 01 70
688 00 00 70
687 00 00 20
689 00 00 40
6 केशवपुरजालपाइ 133 934 00 09 20
877 00 06 40
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1650
4 5 6
2 4
1
876 00 02 50
केशवपुरजालपाइ 133
871 00 07 30
जारी.....
824 00 03 80
823 00 03 60
819 00 03 10
818 00 05 40
00 00 20
773
817 00 04 00
816 00 04 00
815 00 04 70
776/3079 00 04 50
00 02 90
786/3080
785 00 05 30
788 00 03 20
789 00 03 10
796 00 05 40
802 00 05 50
801 00 06 60
723 00 01 60
722 00 02 40
721 00 02 60
720 00 02 70
[फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2012- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव 1651
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2013
S.O. 517.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal ) Via Haldia a pipeline should be laid in State of WestBengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
Andwhereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition ofthe right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C.Sarkar , W.B.C.S ( Exe. )Retd. Competent Authority Paradip - Haldia -Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip - Haidia -Barauni Pipeline Project, P.O , Duillya , Andul - Mouri , Mourigram , Howrah . 711-302 (West Bengal ) 1652
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
SCHEDULE
DISTRICT : PURBA MEDINIPUR
PS : MAHISHADAL
Name of the Mouza
SI . No.
STATE: WEST BENGAL
Area
Khasra No.
(R.S)
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LAKSHYA - 161 4022 00 04 00
4015 00 08 90
4016 00 02 80
4016/5146 00 03 00
4005 00 02 80
4005/5142 00 02 40
3955 00 04 80
3973 00 00 60
3972 00 01 30
3962 00 01 70
3971 00 02 60
3963/5117 00 03 70
3964 00 00 20
3963 00 00 20
3930 00 00 70
3917 00 10 60
3918 00 00 20
3915 00 04 30
3913 00 04 70
3912 00 02 60
3888 00 00 50
3860 00 00 60
00 02 70
3859/5102
3859 00 03 30 3858 00 00 80 3857 00 01 50 3836 00 02 10 3837 00 04 10 3838 00 01 10 3855 00 02 00
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1653
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2
3 4 5 6
LAKSHYA -161 3839 00 01 00
Contd... 3849 00 14
10
3767 00 03 10
3770 00 00 20
3766 00 00 20
3768 00 04 20
3763 00 03 30
3769 00 00 20
2 KALIKAKUNDU - 148 1183 00 03 40
1184 00 09 80
1201 00 04 20
1208 00 00 20
1207 00 01 70
1206 00 01 50
1205 00 01 70.
1211 00 02 10
1210 00 02 90
1213 00 02 40
1199 00 00 70
678 00 00 30
677 00 02 00
675 00 03 50
674 00 02 80
673 00 01 30
672 00 01 40
216 00 04 90
671 00 00 20
217 00 01 70
218 00 02 70
219 00 01 40
220 00 01 50
211 00 02 50
210 00 00 90
209 00 01 20
[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
== THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1654
2 3
1
KALIKAKUNDU - 148 208
Contd... 235
236
207
269
78
79
205
185
182
184
183/3479
183
179
170
171
173
169/3488
172
155
156
56A
3 KANCHANPUR - 137
56
339
=
4 5 6 00 04 80 00 00 20 00 00 20 00 03 60 00 00 30 00 00 50 00 00 70 00 07 40 00 02 10 00 02 10 00 02 50 00 02 20 00 02 50 00 02 50 00 03 20 00 02 30 00 00 20 00 01 50 00 01 30 00 05 30 00 01 50 00 14 90 00 01 00 00 04 30 00 00 70
336/1659
00 03 00
338
00 02 20
325
00 01 50
341
343 00 01 60
324 00 00 40
00 00 30
323
00 00 20
322
00 00 20
342
00 00 20
89
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1655
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3
KANCHANPUR - 137 90
Contd... 344
345
348
349
350
351
352
353
243
244
247
248
250
249
238
237
186
186/1641
185
184
183
182
181
176
179
178
177
163
164
161
158
4 RAJARAMPUR - 130 1473
1474
651GI /13-15
4 5 6 00 00 20 00 02 10 00 05 30 00 03 40 00 00 20 00 00 90 00 02 60 00 01 50 00 00 20 00 02 30 00 01 70 00 01 50 00 02 30 00 01 30 00 00 20 00 01 70 00 02 90 00 01 40 00 01 90 00 01 50 00 01 60 00 03 60 00 00 80 00 00 80 00 01 80 00 00 20 00 01 00 00 00 20 00 03 10 00 01 00 00 00 20 00 03 60 00 04 00 00 02 10
1656
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
RAJARAMPUR -130 1469 00 02 10
Contd... 1470 00 00 60
1468 00 10 10
1476 00 01 00
1465 00 05 60
1466/2971 00 00 20
1482 00 00 90
1483 00 01 50
1484 00 05 50
1489 00 06 10
1490 00 01 30
1491 00 09 00
1515 00 02 70
1514 00 07 10
1512 00 02 60
1690 00 01 00
1523 00 06 00
1528 00 05 30
1524 00 04 80
1527 00 00 90
1532 00 00 20
1533 00 00 60
1536 00 00 70
1531 00 01 10
1530/2962 00 01 50
1530 00 01 30
1529 00 01 90
1556 00 01 90
1559 00 04 40
1560 00 02 30
2863 00 00 40
2864 00 02 00
2860 00 00 80
2865 00 01 30
1657
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4 5 6
1 2 3
2866 00 01 40
RAJARAMPUR - 130
2868 00 07 60
Contd...
2859 00 00 20
00 01 60
2868/2903
00 00 30
2871
2870 00 01 60
00 00 60
857
5 MALUBASAN - 123
00 01 30
860
859 00 01 00
852 00 02 70
850 00 00 80
849 00 03 00
00 04 30
847
00 03 10
803
802 00 01 90
806 00 01 00
801 00 03 00
800 00 01 80
799 00 02 50
00 03 60
714
713 00 02 90
00 03 80
712
717 00 00 40
710 00 03 00
709 00 00 20
702 00 03 80
00 00 30
703
685 00 05 50
686 00 01 70
688 00 00 70
00 00 20
687
6891 00 00 40
934 00 09 20
6 KESHABPURJALPAI - 133
877 00 06 40
1658
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1
2
3
KESHABPURJALPAI 133
876
Contd...
871
824
823
819
818
773
817
816
815
PART 11-- SEC . 3 ( ii ) |
4
5
6
00
02
50
00
07
30
00
03
80
00
03
60
00
03
10
00
05
40
00
00
20
00
04
00
04
00
00
04
70
00
00
04
50
776/3079
786/3080 00 02 90 785 00 05 30 788 00 03 20 789 00 03 10 796 00 05 40 802 00 05 50 801 00 06 60 723 00 01 60 722 00 02 40 721 00 02 60 720 00 02 70
[ F. No. R - 25011 / 29/2012 -O.R. - I ]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
1659 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
नई दिल्ली , 22 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 518.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में पारादीप (उड़ीसा) से दुर्गापुर (पश्चिम बंगाल) तक वाया हल्दिया एलपीजी गैस परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबद्व अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस.सी. सरकार, डब्ल्यू. बी. सी. एस. (प्रशासनिक ) सेवानिवृत्त सक्षम प्राधिकारी , पारादीप - हल्दिया दुर्गापुर एलपीजी पाइपलाइन एवम् पारादीप - हल्दिया – बरौनी पाइपलाइन ऑगमेंटेशन योजना , डाकघर दुईल्या, आन्दुल मौरी , मौरीग्राम हावड़ा-711 302 (पश्चिम बंगाल) को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1660
अनुसूची
राज्य: पश्चिम बंगाल
जिला : पूर्व मेदिनीपुर पुलिस स्टेशन: महिषादल
खसरा सं.
मौजा का नाम
कुम सं.
2 3
1
1 कालिकाकून्डू 148 2076
2077
2078
2079
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2089
2088
2128
2127
2126
2129
2125
2133
2134
2141
2159
2158
2157
2426
2404
2403
2405
2411
2406
2408
2409
2410
2419
2418
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मी.
एयर
हेक्टेयर
4 5 6 00 02 30 00 02 50 00 01 50 00 01 10 00 08 40 00 01 30 00 01 70 00 01 40 00 03 60 00 00 40 00 04 10 00 02 20 00 02 50 00 00 80 00 05 20 00 00 40 00 01 90 00 02 30 00 06 80 00 09 20 00 04 00 00 02 50 00 09 30 00 02 30 00 00 20 00 01 00 00 00 20 00 01 10 00 00 50 00 02 80 00 00 80 00 03 00 00 02 50,
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1661
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
2417 00 03 10
कालिकाकून्डू 148
जारी...... 2640 00 00 70
2641 00 01 30
00 02 20
2650
00 01 80
2648
2649 00 01 80
00 03 70
2647
00 02 10
2646.
2706 00 05 40
2705 00 00 90
2693 00 05 70
3465 00 03 70
3466 00 07 40
3483 00 04 00
2686 00 00 40
2063 00 02 20
2064 00 02 50
2069 00 05 50
2070 00 03 70
2 चॉपी 1799 00 01 40
146
1798 00 06 90
1802 00 04 70
00 05 90
1791/2558
1882 00 01 30 1879 00 04 20 1884 00. 03 80 1878 00 05 60 1876 00 05 70 1875 00 07 30 1934 00 03 00 1936 00 01 50 1937 00 02 80 1947 00 00 40 1616 00 03 80 1614 00 00 90 1612 00 00 80 1949 00 00 40
1662
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
2 3 4 5 6
1
चॉपी 1611 00 01 20
146
जारी. 1957 00 00 20
1958 00 02 50
1959 00 00 20
00 09 90
1575
1965 00 04 00
1968 00 04 30
1573 00 00 80
1969 00 03 90
1572 00 07 00
1976 00 01 20
1977 00 02 40
1978 00 00 20
1979 00 04 70
1980 00 00 60
1981 00 02 30
1982 00 01 30
2074 00 02 20
2073 00 00 40
2075 00 03 00
2457 00 06 90
7 00 00 70
00 00 70
8
9 00 00 70
00 05 00
2477
85 00 00 70
3 झाउपातरा 144
00 02 30
84
83/1213 00 01 00
81 00 01 40
80 00 05 60
94/1177 00 02 80
79 00 00 40
94 00 07 90
128 06 10
133 00 01 40
181 00 01 70
182 00 04 10
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1663
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
2
1
3
144
झाउपातरा
826
जारी......
87 4
5
6
00
60
02
00
01
90
00
02
10
188/1171
188 00 04 10
207 00 05 50
208 00 05 40
210 00 01 30
511 00 00 20
512 00 00 20
516 00 01 90
517 00 00 50
518 00 00 20
519 00 01 90
520 00 00 90
524 00 00 40
523 00 01 80
522 00 00 90
510 00 07 70
584 00 02 40
585 00 01 10
583 00 00 40
586 00 06 20
601 00 02 70
602 00 00 80
603 00 00 60
605 00 01 00
606 00 02 50
608 00 00 20
609 00 02 10
610 00 00 30
00 02 80
722/1368
04
00
00
722/1367
726 727 7284 712 713
651GI /13-16
00 02 00 00 03 80 00 00 80 00 06 60 00 00 50
1664
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 5 6
1 2 3
00 00 20
झाउपातरा 144 714
711 00 00 80
जारी.
00 03 00
699
00 01 40
700
00 00 20
703
702 00 01 40
701 00 02 90
704 00 01 30
00 00 60
675
676 00 00 70
674 00 04 10
00 00 60
671
669 00 00 80
670 00 02 10
886 00 00 70
887 00 00 60
891 00 00 90
00 00 80
892
223 00 01 50
4 काकूड़दा 136
224 00 01 10
00 01 20
221
00 07 20
219
215 00 01 10
216 00 02 00
217 00 00 60
218 00 00 20
59 00 04 30
56 00 01 30
55 00 03 50
00 03 00
5 बागदा 138 1056/1268
1065 00 01 70
1066 00 01 50
1064 00 02 20
1063 00 00 50
1069 00 00 20
1105 00 00 20
1068 00 00 20
1067 00 01 60
1665
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4 5 6
2 3
1
00 02 50
बागदा 138 1104
00 05 00
जारी...... 1097
00 00 30'
1096
00 01 90
1110
00 01 40
1111
00 00 60
1112
00 03 40
1094
00 00 30
1113
1136 00 06 20
00 07 00
1137
00 01 50
1159
1144 00 03 10
1145 00 03 70
00 01 10
1000
00 01 20
134 1323
6 बामुन्या
1320 00 01 60
1319 00 01 70
1317 00 02 30
1318 00 02 40
1988 00 00 50
00 00 60
1327
1328 00 03 90
1308 00 00 90
1307 00 04 00
00 00 70
1350
1301 00 01 80
1300 00 01 10
1302 00 00 20
1303 00 01 30
1298 00 01 90
1297 00 00 20
1296 00 02 10
1295 00 00 30
1294 00 01 10
00 02 40
1278
00 02 00
1277
1276 00 01 30
00 04 80
1268
1666
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
4 5 6
1 2 3
1283 00 00 60
बामुन्या 134
जारी...... 1267 00 01 60
1265 00 02 30
00 03 70
1264
00 05 50
1263
1262 00 03 80
2251 00 02 60
2249 00 00 20
1464 00 00 50
00 00 70
1381
1405 00 02 00
1406 00 01 40
1407 00 07 10-
1421 00 01 60
1420 00 02 50
1419 00 04 40
1418 00 09 60
1415 00 01 40
1433 00 01 80
1630 00 02 30
1629 00 03 20
1628 00 07 90
1611 00 00 90
2284 00 01 80
2290 00 01 40
2289 00 01 60
1596 00 01 70
1498 00 00 80
1512 00 04 10
00 03 30
1511
1509 00 02 20
1508 00 00 40
1507 00 02 50
1506 00 02 70
1505 00 01 10
132 1336 00 01 80
7 कान्चनपुर जालपाइ
1337 00 02 40
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1667
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
1338
132 कान्चनपुर जालपाइ
1335 जारी.....
179
181
180
173
6
4
5
60
00
00
00
10
02
00
00
40
00
03
80
00
03
60
00
70
00
20
00
00
178/1284
174/1282
174 00
04
20
00
08
80
00
03
80
174/1283
164 00 01 50
163 00 09 10
146 00 00 40
150 00 00 20
149 00 11 20
136 00 00 20
134 00 03 00
135 00 05 40
132 00 06 00
130 00 01 10
670 00 04 00
671 00 04 10
673 00 03 80
676 00 01 90
677 00 01 90
678. 00 03 00
718 00 03 50
717 00 04 40
00 02 20
714/1386
715 00 03 20
00 02 40
715/1387
00
00
50
711/1384
710 00 02 80
00 03 00
710/1383
795 00 02 50 796 00 02 90 797 00 03 30
1668
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
2 3 4 5 6
1
132 798 00 03 60
कान्चनपुर जालपाइ
जारी..... 814 00 00 40
815 00 01 80
816 00 01 10
810 00 01 50
809 00 00 70
808 00 02 10
807 00 02 30
824 00 03 60
00 00 20
824/1408
00
40
02
824/1407
00
00
50
827/1406
30
00
00
827/1401
8 दक्षिन काशिम नगर 129
40
00
04
451/837
451 00 02 40
450 00 02 30
448 00 01 90
447 00 02 10
446 00 04 50
444 00 00 90
842 00 01 40
443 00 01 10
434 00 00 50
436 00 01 30
437 00 00 50
435 00 01 80
407 00 17 20
411 00 01 60
412 00 00 60
00 04 40
379/818
379 00 03 50
378 00 02 10
00 02 10
378/874
368 00 02 90 824 00 04 20 356 00 02 60 355 00 01 20
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1669
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1
2
3
दक्षिन काशिम नगर 129
354
जारी......
351
352
348
331
325
334
324
323
313 4
5
6
00
00
90
00
20
00
00
01
90
00
00
80
00
03
20
00
03
80
00
01
90
00
01
20
00
02
70
00
03
10
00
01
50
314/838
314 00 01 50 302 00 01 20 315 00 00 50 301 00 01 70 296 00 00 40 299 00 02 80 300 00 02 80 290 00 02 00 289 00 00 90 274 00 00 50 273 00 00 90 272 00 00 70 68 00 00 30 69 00 02 70 67 00 00 20 66 00 00 20 72 00 01 00 73 00 00 90 71 00 00 20 74 00 01 00 95 00 00 70 75 00 00 30 76 00 04 60 80 00 02 10 81 00 02 00 82 00 00 50
1670
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
3 4 5 6
1 2
दक्षिन काशिम नगर 129 42 00 03 10
जारी...... 44 00 02 30
00 00 40
41
37 00 01 50
7 00 00 80
8 00 02 90
9 00 02 40
10/809 00 00 20
30 00 00 70
29 00 01 80
31 00 00 50
28 00 00 50
25 00 02 10
20 00 02 70
22 00 01 30
23 00 00 50
144 00 02 30
18 00 00 40
146 00 00 40
[फा. सं. आर-25011/29/2012- ओं.आर. - 1 ]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi. the 22nd February, 2013
S.O. 518.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Paradip (Odisha) to Durgapur (West Bengal ) Via Haldia a pipeline should be laid in State of WestBengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited .
Anu whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto:
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisitior of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C.Sarkar, 1671
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
W.B.C.S ( Exe . ) Retd . Competent Authority Paradip - Haldia -Durgapur LPG Pipeline & Augmentation of Paradip - Haldia -Barauni Pipeline Project , P.O , Duillya, Andul - Mouri , Mourigram, Howrah , 711-302 (West Bengal )
SCHEDULE
STATE : WEST BENGAL
DISTRICT : PURBA MEDINIPUR
P.S : MAHISADAL
SI . Khasra No.
Name of the Mouza
No.
2 3
1
1 KALIKAKUNDU - 148 2076
2077
2078
2079
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2089
2088
2128
2127
2126
2129
2125
2133
2134
2141
2159
2158
2157
2426
2404
2403
2405
2411
2406
2408
2409
2410
2419
2418
651GI/13-17
:
Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
4 5 6
02 30
00
00 02 50
00 01 50
00 01 10
00 08 40
00 01 30
00 01 70
00 01 40
00 03 60
00 00 40
00 04 10
00 02 20
00 02 50
00 00 80
00 05 20
00 00 40
00 01 90
00 02 30
00 06 80
00 09 20
00 04 00
00 02 50
00 09 30
00 02 30
00 00 20
00 01 00
00 00 20
00 01 10
00 00 50
00 02 80
00 00 80
00 03 00
00 02 50
1672
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3
KALIKAKUNDU - 148 2417
Contd .. 2640
2641
2650
2648
2649
2647
2646
2706
2705
2693
3465
3466
3483
2686
2063
2064
2069
2070
2 CHANPI - 146 1799
1798
1802
1791/2558
1882
1879
1884
1878
1876
1875
1934
1936
1937
1947
1616
1614
1612
1949
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
4 5 6 00 03 10 00 00 70 00 01 30 00 02 20 00 01 80 00 01 80 00 03 70 00 02 10 00 05 40 00 00 90 00 05 70 00 03 70 00 07 40 00 04 00 00 00 40 00 02 20 00 02 50 00 05 50 00 03 70 00 01 40 00 06 90 00 04 70 00 05 90 00 01 30 00 04 20 00 03 80 00 05 60 00 05 70 00 07 30 00 03 00 00 01 50 00 02 80 00 00 40 00 03 80 00 00 90 00 00 80 00 00 40
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1673
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3 4 5 6
CHANPI - 146 1611 00 01 20
Contd.. 1957 00 00 20
1958 00 02 50
1959 00 00 20
1575 00 09 90
1965 00 04 00
1968 00 04 30
1573 00 00 80
1969 00 03 90
1572 00 07 00
1976 00 01 20
1977 00 02 40
1978 00 00 20
1979 00 04 70
1980 00 00 60
1981 00 02 30
1982 00 01 30
2074 00 02 20
2073 00 00 40
2075 00 03 00
2457 00 06 90
7 00 00 70
8 00 00 70
9 00 00 70
2477 00 05 00
3 JHAUPATRA - 144 85 00 00 70
84 00 02 30
83/1213 00 01 00
81 00 01 40
80 00 05 60
94/1177 00 02 80
79 00 00 40
94 00 07 90
128 00 06 10
133 00 01 40
181 00 01 70
182 00 04 10
PART 11 - SEC. 3( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1674
4 5 6
1 2 3
00 02 60
JHAUPATRA - 144 826
00 01 90
Contd. 87
00 02 10
188/1171
00 04 10
188
00 05 50
207
00 05 40
208
00 01 30
210
00 00 20
511
00 00 20
512
00 01 90
516
00 00 50
517
00 00 20
518
00 01 90
519
00 00 90
520
00 00 40
524
00 01 80
523
00 00 90
522
00 07 70
510
00 02 40
584-
00 01 10
585
00 00 40
583
00 06 20
586
00 02 70
601
00 00 80
602
00 00 60
603
00 01 00
605
00 02 50
606
00 00 20
608
00 02 10
609
00 00 30
610
722/1368 00 02 80
00 04 00
722/1367
00 02 00
726
00 03 80
727
00 00 80
728
00 06 60
712
00 00 50
713
1675
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4 5 6
1 2 3
00 00 20
JHAUPATRA - 144 714
00 00 80
Contd. 711
00 03 00
699
00 01 40
700
00 00 20
703
00 01 40
702
00 02 90
701
00 01 30
704
00 00 60
675
00 00 70
676
00 04 10
674
00 00 60
671
00 00 80
669
00 02 10
670
00 00 70
886
00 00 60
887
00 00 90
891
00 00 80
892
00 01 50
4 KAKURDA - 136 223
00 01 10
224
00 01 20
221
00 07 20
219
00 01 10
215
00 02 00
216
00 00 60
217
00 00 20
218
00 04 30
59
00 01 30
56
00 03 50
55
00 03 00
5 BAGDA -138 1056/1268
00 01 70
1065
00 01 50
1066
00 02 20
1064
00 00 50
1063
00 00 20
1069
00 00 20
1105
00 00 20
1068
00 01 60
1067
1676
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3
BAGDA -138 1104
Contd . 1097
1096
1110
1111
1112
1094
1113
1136
1137
1159
1144
1145
1000
6 BAMUNYA - 134 1323
1320
1319
1317
1318
1988
1327
1328
1308
1307
1350
1301
1300
1302
1303
1298
1297
1296
1295
1294
1278
1277
1276
1268
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
4 5 6 00 02 50 00 05 00 00 00 30 00 01 90 00 01 40 00 00 60 00 03 40 00 00 30 00 06 20 00 07 00 00 01 50 00 03 10 00 03 70 00 01 10' 00 01 20 00 01 60 00 01 70 00 02 30 00 02 40 00 00 50 00 00 60 00 03 90 00 00 90 00 04 00 00 00 70 00 01 80 00 01 10 00 00 20 00 01 30 00 01 90 00 00 20 00 02 10 00 00 30 00 01 10 00 02 40 00 02 00 00 01 30 00 04 80
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1677
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 4 5 6
3
BAMUNYA - 134 1283 00 00 60
Contd. 00 01 60
1267
1265 00 02 30
1264 00 03 70
1263 00 05 50
1262 00 03 80
2251 00 02 60
2249 00 00 20
1464 00 00 50
1381 00 00 70
1405 00 02 00
1406 00 01 40
1407 00 07 10
1421 00 01 60
1420 00 02 50
1419 00 04 40
1418 00 09 60
1415 00 01 40
1433 00 01 80
1630 00 02 30
1629 00 03 20
1628 00 07 90
1611 00 00 90
2284 00 01 80
2290 00 01 40
2289 CO 01 60
1596 00 01 70
00 00 80
1498
1512 00 04 10
00 03 30
1511
1509 00 02 20
1508 00 00 40
1507 00 02 50
1506 00 02 70
1505 00 01 10
7 KANCHANPURJALPAI - 132 1336 00 01 80
1337 00 02 40
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1678
4 5 6
2 3
1
00 00 60
KANCHANPURJALPAI - 132 1338
00 02 10
Contd.. 1335
00 00 40
179
00 03 80
181
00 03 60
180
00 00 70
173
00 00 20
178/1284
00 04 20
174/1282
00 08 80
174
00 03 80
174/1283
00 01 50
164
00 09 10
163
00 00 40
146
00 00 20
150
00 11 20
149
00 00 20
136
00 03 00
134
00 05 40
135
00 06 00
132
00 01 10
130
00 04 00
670
00 04 10
671
00 03 80
673
00 01 90
676
00 01 90
677
00 03 00
678
00 03 50
718
00 04 40
717
00 02 20
714/1386
00 03 20
715
00 02 40
715/1387
00 00 50
711/1384
00 02 80
710
00 03 00
710/1383
00 02 50
795
00 02 90
796
00 03 30
797
[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
1679
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1 2 3
KANCHANPURJALPAΙ - 132 798
Contd... 814
815
816
810
809
808
807
824
824/1408
824/1407
827/1406
827/1401
8 DAKSHINKASIMNAGAR - 129 451/837
451
450
448
447
446
444
842
443
434
436
437
435
407
411
412
379/818
379
378
378/874
368
824
356
355
651 GI/13-18
4 5 6 00 03 60 00 00 40 00 01 80 00 01 10 00 01 50 00 00 70 00 02 10 00 02 30 00 03 60 00 00 20 00 02 40 00 00 50 00 00 30 00 04 40 00 02 40 00 02 30 00 01 90 00 02 10 00 04 50 00 00 90 00 01 40 00 01 10 00 00 50 00 01 30 00 00 50 00 01 80 00 17 20 00 01 60 00 00 60 00 04 40 00 03 50 00 02 10 00 02 10 00 02 90 00 04 20 00 02 60 00 01 20
1680
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2; 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1 2 3
DAKSHINKASIMNAGAR - 129 354
Contd. 351
352
348
331
325
334
324
323
313
314/838
314
302
315
301
296
299
300
290
289
274
273
272
68
69
67
66
72
73
71
74
95
75
76
80
81
82
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
4 5 6 00 00 90 00 00 20 00 01 90 00 00 80 00 03 20 00 03 80 00 01 90 00 01 20 00 02 70 00 03 10 00 01 50 00 01 50 00 01 20 00 00 50 00 01 70 00 00 40 00 02 80 00 02 80 00 02 00 00 00 90 00 00 50 00 00 90 00 00 70 00 00 30 00 02 70 00 00 20 00 00 20 00 01 00 00 00 90 00 00 20 00 01 00 00 00 70 00 00 30 00 04 60 00 02 10 00 02 00 00 00 50
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1681
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
4 5 6
1 2 3
00 03 10
DAKSHINKASIMNAGAR - 129 42
00 02 30
Contd . 44
00 00 40
41
00 01 50
37
00 00 80
7
00 02 90
8
00 02 40
9
00 00 20
10/809
00 00 70
30
00 01 80
29
00 00 50
31
00 00 50
28
00 02 10
25
00 02 70
20
00 01 30
22
00 00 50
23
00 02 30
144
00 00 40
18
00 00 40
146
[ F. No. R- 25011 / 29/2012 - O.R. - I ] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1682
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2013
(2A) ofthe Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide Order No. L- 12011/ 148/2008- IR(B - II ) dated 11-1-2005 for adjudication on the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
का.आ. 519. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-01-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India is justified in terminating the services of S/ Shri R. P. Mahesh and V. Krishnamurthy, Temporary workers w.e.f. 31-5-2001 ? Ifnot , what relief they are entitled to ? "
[सं. एल -12011 / 148/2008- आई आर ( बी- II) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 4th February, 2013
2. After completion of the pleadings and evidence ofboth sides when the case was posted for arguments on merits on 05-12-2012 , the learned advocate appearing for the Iparty filed a Memo to the effect that the management has collected all necessary applications/documents from the said workmen for recruitment for the post of Safai Karmachari -cum- Sub - staff as per their internal circular / office order with a condition that the workmen shall withdraw the dispute , hence , the Secretary of the I party Union and the concerned workmen prayed this Tribunal topermit the I party to withdraw the dispute as settled Out of Court. Accordingly, the proceedings is closed and following Nil Award is passed.
S.O. 519. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-01-2013 .
ORDER
[No. L- 12011/ 148 /2008 - IR (B - II) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer
The reference is rejected as Settled Out of Court by the Parties .
ANNEXURE
S. N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2013
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE
Dated: 5th December, 2012
Present : SHRI S. N. NAVALGUND , Presiding Officer C.R. No. 10/2005
IParty :
का.आ. 520. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटीए ऑफ 7/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-01-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
TheGeneral Secretary, Central Bank of India Employees Congress , C/ o Central Bank of India , Bangalore City Branch , K. G Road , Bangalore -560009 .
[सं. एल -12011/169/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 4th February, 2013 II Party : The ChiefManager, Central Bank of India , 71, Millers Road , Sonia Towers , Bangalore -560 052.
Appearances:
IParty : Shri Sarat Chandra Bijai , Advocate
S.O. 520. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGITA of27/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 31-01-2013 .
IIParty : Shri Pradeep S. Sawkar , Advocate AWARD
[No. L- 12011/ 169/2004- IR (B - II) ] SHEESH RAM , Section Officer 1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) of sub- section 1683 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, AHMEDABAD
Present :
SHRI BINAY KUMAR SINHA, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum- Labour Court , Ahmedabad , Dated 21st January, 2013
Reference : CGITA of 27/2005
The ChiefManager ( CS) ,
First Party
Bank of India, Zonal Office , Ahmedabad Zone , BOI Building , Bhadra , Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) -380001
And
Second Party
Theirworkman Through Union Bank India Staff, General Secretary, Bank of India Staff Union , C/ o Bank of India , Bhadra, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) -380001 .
Forthe first party : Mrs. Meena Shah , Advocate
For the second party Shri B.K. Oza , Advocate
AWARD
said Bank . But suddenly the Bank management issued a notice tohim dated 21-11-2003 calling for explanation that he received an amount of Rs . 600 from the Account holder for depositing said amount in the Saving Bank A/c No. 1462 Vina Gauri SSHY Mahila Group Vasai , but he did not deposit said amount in the said bank account of the account holder and used the amount . Further case is that he received the amount ofRs . 600 from the postman namely Zala to whom the said account holder had given to the said postman and the postman handed over the said amount to him to be deposited in the said branch of bank where he is working , but used that money instead of depositing in the account of said account holder. Even on praying to take lenient view, the bank issued chargsheet and conducted domestic inquiry against him and that he admitted the charges and sought for lenient view to be taken against him but in spite of that on the basis of inquiry report the Disciplinary Authority passed the punishment order ofhis discharge by order dated 28-02-2004. He made departmental appeal on 15-03-2004 but the Appellate Authority did not also consider to award light punishment , rather confirmed the order of punishment passed by the Disciplinary Authority. Further case is that principle of natural justice was not followed and even on admitting that the said amount was expended in treatment of his ailing father no any lenient view was taken either by DisciplinaryAuthority in awarding punishment or even it was considered by the Appellate Authority . On these scores prayer has been made that the order of his discharge dated 28-02-2004 is illegal , unwarranted and the same be set aside and he be reinstated to the post on which he was working with back-wages.
TheCentral Government/ Ministry of Labour , by its reference order No. L- 12011 / 169/2004- IR (B - II) New Delhi , dated 17-02-2005 considering Industrial Dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of India, and their workman , referred the dispute in exercise ofpowers conferred by cl . (d) of sub - section (2A) ofSection 10 of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this C.G.I.T. - cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad formulating the terms of reference as schedule as follows :-
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of Bank of India Staff Union , Ahmedabad for reinstatement of Shri M.D. Makwana , Ex - Part Time sweeper w.e.f. 28-02-2004 with continuity ofservice and consequential benefits by the management of Bank of India , Zonal Office, Ahmedabad is proper and justified? If so , what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"
2. On registering of the case notices were issued to the parties to submit pleading - s/ c and w.s. with relevant papers . Both parties appeared and filed respective pleadings.
4. The management ofbank ( first party) as per Ext . 7 (written statement ) has pleaded inter - alia that the concernedworkman was working as part time sweeper at Bank'sMahijada branch w.e.f. 15-02-1999 . The Bank had received complaint from Smt . Pravina H. Trevidi and Daxa B. Patel dated 20-11-2003 stating therein that though they had given the amount of Rs . 300 each in the month of September and October-2003 to Shri Jasubhai Zala for depositing the said amount of Rs . 600 in the Saving Bank AccountNo. 1462 in Vina Gauri SSHY Mahila Group, Vasai, and that the said amount was handed over to the concerned workman by Jasubhai Zala (postman ) for depositing the said amount in the Bank account. Then the concerned workman was issued a memorandum dated 21-11-2003 seeking his clarification , which was duly received by him . Onreceipt of the said memorandum , the workman concerned has stated that he had not deposited the said amount in the said bank account. Thereafter management ofbank had issued a charge sheet dated 17-12-2003 on the allegation that the workman concerned had misappropriated the customer's money amounting to Rs. 600 received by him for depositing in the customer's account . The aforesaid cause involving dishonesty on 3. The case of the second party workman as per Ext . 4 (statement of claim) is that he was working as part time sweeper at Mahizada branch of Bank of India w.e.f. 15-02-1999 . Further case is that besides the sweeping work he has no any other work to be performed in the Branch of 1684
[ PART II- SEC . 3 (ii)) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1931
the part of workınan amount to gross misconduct in terms of clause 5 (j ) of the memorandum of settlement dated 10-04-2002 . Gujarati version of the aforesaid charge sheet wasalso included for easy understanding of the workman. By order dated 17-12-2003 ofDisciplinary Authority Shri A.J. Pandya, Staff Officer, Zonal Office was appointed as Inquiry Officer and Shri H.T. Dhakan , Staff Officer Manekchowk Branch as Presenting Officer in the domestic inquiry. The concerned workman was intimated vide letter dated 26-12-2003 that the inquiry will be held in Mahijada Branch on 05-01-2004 at 11 a.m. and the workman was advised to attend along with his defence representative if any. On05-01-2004 inquiry was held by the InquiryOfficer and the Presenting Officer as well the concerned workman along with Shri G.P. Dave , General Secretary BOI Staff Union as defence representative were present on that date ofinquiry and the workman admitted the charges levelled against him and submitted his written representation dated 05-01-2004 which was taken on record ofthe inquiry. Since the workman admitted the charges levelled against him , the inquiry was concluded , then inquiry officer submitted hisfindings dated 22-01-2004 to the Disciplinary Authority along with proceedings and documents giving findings that the charges levelled against the workman has been proved. The Disciplinary Authority after going through the inquiry report and the materials issued second show cause punishment notice dated 09-02-2004 against the concerned workman .
5. The copy of the inquiry report of the inquiry officer was also attached with the second show cause notice and the same was received by the concerned workman , the workman concerned was also advised to appear before the Disciplinary Authority along with his defence representative on 16-02-2004 at 3.30 p.m. for giving personal hearing . A Gujarati version of the show cause punishment notice was also enclosed for easy understanding of the concerned workman . The workman with his defence representative had attended before the Disciplinary Authority for personal hearing . Then the Disciplinary Authority after carefully going through the submissions made by the workman concerned passed the punishment order dated 28-02-2004 imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement from the Bank's service with immediate effect with superannuation benefits i.e. pension and /or P.F. and Gratuity as would be due available under the rules and regulation prevailing at the relevant time in terms of clause 6 ( c) of the memorandum of settlement dated 10-04-2002 . The workman concerned preferred departmental appeal before the Appellate Authority on 15.03.2004 where also personal hearing was given and the Appellate Authority confirmed the punishment order of Disciplinary Authority by order dated 03-04-2004 and rejected the appeal of the concerned workman, a Gujarati Version of the said order was also given to the concerned workman . It is also the case of the first party that in view of the charge of misappropriation ofRs . 600 levelled against the workman concerned having proved conclusively, the punishment imposed upon the workman concerned is legal and proper and therefore , the workman concerned is not entitled for his reinstatement and back wages or any toliefs as prayed for. The first party has admitted para I of the statement of claim that he was working as part time sweeper at Mahijada Branch of the Bank . The other averments of s'e made in other paras are deniedby the Bank . Further case is that the principles of natural justice was followed in conducting domestic inquiry and opportunity was given to the delinquent workman to defend himself with his defence representative butwhen the delinquent workman confessed his guilt and admitted the charges levelled against him unisappropriating Rs. 600 of the account holder for not depositing the said amount in the account at Mahijada Branch , the inquiry had concluded . Further contention is that the punishment as to order of discharge with superannuation benefit and also not preventing from employment in other department is not harsh and shocking for invoking the Jurisdiction of Labour Court/Tribunal te consider the provision of section 11 A of the ID Act. The cornered workman in his statement ofclaim has made baseless allegations for memorandum dated 21 November , 2003 and the charge sheet dated 17-01-2004 are contradictory. Further case is that the bank is a public sector undertaking dealing with public fund and each and every employee of the bank is a Trusty of the Bank and that the trust imposed by the customer Veena Gauri SSH Mahijada Group and Shri Jashwant S. Zala has been breached by the workman concerned and so the misconduct committed by the workman concerned amounting to gross misconduct involving misappropriation of customers/banks funds , so the punishment imposed upon the workman concerned is just , legal , proper and valid and so the workman is not entitled to any relief.
6. It may be noted here that the second party workman has not challenged the propriety of the domestic enquiry held against him by filing any pursis and so no any preliminary issue has been formulated in this case as to propriety or otherwise of domestic inquiry for giving findings on the preliminary issue
7. Upon the pleadings of the parties the following issues are taken up for discussions and determinations .
ISSUES
(1) Whether the reference is maintainable ?
(II ) Whether the workman/ union has valid cause of action to raise Industrial Dispute against the punishment order dated 28-02-2004 ?
( III) Whether the principle of natural justice was followed in holding domestic inquiry by the management of first party against the delinquent workman ( second party) ?
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1685
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
(IV) Whether the order of punishment dated 28.02.2004 is shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct of the delinquent workman(second party) ?
(V) Whether the demand of the union (Bank of India Staff Union) Ahmedabad for reinstatement of the workman Shri M.D. Makwana Ex - part time sweeper w.e.f. 28.02.2004 with continuity of service and consequential benefits is proper and justified ?
(VI) Whether the second party workman is entitled to the relief as claimed ?
(VII) What orders are to be passed ?
FINDINGS
8. ISSUE Nos . III & IV
The management of Bank of India through a list Ext. 8 has produced as many as 14 documents concerning the domestic inquiry held against the delinquent workman which have been given pakka exhibits from Ext . 9 to 22 . Ext. 9 is memorandum to the workman concerned dated 21-11-2003 , Ext . 10 is explanation by the workman concerned dated 21-11-1993 , Ext . 11 is memorandum dated 11-12-2003 along with chargesheet dated 17-12-2003 also with Gujarati version Ext . 12 is order of appointment of inquiry officer dated 11-12-2003 , Ext . 13 is order of appointment of Presenting officer dated 17-12-2003 , Ext . 14 is inquiry proceeding dated 26.12.2003 along with documents marked ME- 1 ME - 15 along with document submitted by the workman Ext. 15 is finding of the inquiry officerdated 22-01-2004. Ext. 16 is the copy of show cause punishment notice dated 07-12-2004 along with Gujarati version , Ext . 17 is minutes of personal hearing dated 23-02-2004 made by the Disciplinary Authority Ext . 18 is representation given by workman concerned dated 23-02-2004, Ext . 19 is copy of punishment order dated 28-02-2004 along with Gujarati version, Ext . 20 is appeal to AppellateAuthority dated 15-03-2004 along withGujarati version , Ext . 21 is minutes of personal hearing of the Appellate Authority dated 16-03-2004, Ext . 22 is the copy of order of Appellate Authority dated 03-04-2004 along with Gujarati version . The first party has relied upon those documentary evidences in support that domestic inquiry wasconducted properly observing the principles ofnatural justice. The second party workman has not challenged as to the legality and propriety of the domestic inquiry conductedby the bank against him and did not lead oral evidence to challenge the propriety and legality of the domestic inquiry. Rather the second party workman has only examined himself at Ext. 24 that he was getting Rs . 2,000 per month by the Bank as part time job of sweeper and after his termination from the services he is unemployed he was also cross - examined by the lawyer of the first party bank suggesting him that he is in gainful employment and is earning from sweeping job and other jobs since after termination . The first party bank filed pursis at Ext . 29 mentioning therein that the workman side has admitted legality and propriety of the domestic inquiry conducted by the bank against him and the second party has not lead oral evidence on this point so the first party bank has not also desired to lead oral evidence on the point of legality and propriety of the domestic inquiry and so the oral evidence of the first party may be treated as closed. Thereafter vide Ext. 30 the first party has submitted copyofmemorandum of settlement on disciplinary action andprocedure dated 10-04-2002/27-05-2002 through a list . The copy of the memorandum of settlement has been marked Ext. 30/1 .
9. Now coming to the documentary evidence lead by the first party regarding the entire domestic enquiry conducted against the delinquent workman ( second party). From Ext . 9 it appears that the preliminary inquiry was conducted on receiving complaint by the bank from the account holder that the amount of Rs . 300 each for the month of September 2003 and October 2003 given to J.V. Zala (postman) have not been credited into the account . Onmakingpreliminary inquiry by the bank it had come to notice from inquiry with the said postman J.V. Zala who disclosed that the amount of Rs . 600 was given to the concerned workman M.D. Makwana in the earlier morning hours in the bank premises when he was cleaning the branch premises , for depositing same in the customer's account on very date when it was confirmed by the bank that the said amount handed over by the account holder to the said postman and in turn the said postman had given the said amount to Rs . 600 to the concerned workman in the bank premises for depositing the same in the account of account holder but the concerned workman have not deposited the same in customers account on the very same day and not even said date , then explanation was called for. Ext. 10 is the written explanation in the pen and signature ofthe concerned workman dated 21-11-2003 wherein he admitted that the amount given to him by the postman on behalf of the account holder has been utilized by him in the treatment of his father and was not deposited in the account of account holder Ext. 11 is the memorandum along with charge sheet dated 17-12-2003 with Gujarati version . From perusal of the memoranduın and the chargesheet I find that there is no any discrepancy in the charge sheet and as per charge sheet dated 17-12-2003 and as per memorandum to the workman concerned dated 21-11-2003 vide Ext. 9. The charge sheet is clearly speaking that the delinquent workman through postman Shri J.S. Zala (village postman) has received the amount of Rs . 300 each on two occasions for depositing the same in the S.B. Account of the account holder and the sum of Rs . 600 handed over to you by Shri J.V. Zala for depositing in the customer's account to you did not deposit the said amount ofRs . 600, So , received from Shri Zala and thus you have [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1686
from Zala he also admitted that he utilized the said money in his father's treatment it also appear that subsequently on 1-12-2003 he deposited Rs . 600 in the customers SB Account No. 1462 also requesting not to consider the utilization ofthe money of Rs . 600 as misappropriation of the customers money also requesting to them to consider the matters empathetically and leniently .
10. From perusal of Ext . 15 the inquiry report ofthe officers I find that all the relevant materials documents produced by both sides in the departmental inquiry were meticulously considered and an opportunity was also given to defend himself but the workman or defence representative has not produced any defence exhibits and also in view of the clear admission of the charges as to misappropriation of money amounting to Rs . 600 of the account holders by not depositing the said amount in the account of the account holder proved that he misappropriated the amount of Rs . 600 so the charges levelled against Mr. M.D. Makwana part time sweeper of Mahijada branch has been proved conclusively. From perusal of Exts . 16, 17, 18, 19 , 20 , 21 and 22 it appears that the principle of natural justice was also followed at the level ofthe Disciplinary Authority in issuing second show cause notice to the delinquent workman . Directing to appear for personal hearing to defend himself against the proposed punishment and that personal hearing was given and thereafter order of punishment of compulsory retirement with pensionary benefits not causing disqualification for other employment was passed . It also appear that at the appellate stage also principle of natural justice was followed in giving personal hearing to the delinquent workman.
11. From going through the documentary evidence by way ofthe entire copy of inquiry proceeding submitted by the first party bank , it appears that proper and valid domestic inquiry was conducted against the second party workman and at every stage principle of natural justice was followed.
12. I have also gone through the order of punishment dated 28-02-2004 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, Chief Manager ( Ahmedabad Zone ) I find that the Disciplinary Authority has discussed all the pros and cons of the allegations supported with the documents before the domestic inquiry and has concurred with the findings of the inquiry officer about the proved guilt of the charesheeted employee in misappropriating the money ofthe account holders which was to be deposited by him in account holders account at Mahijada branch where he was working as part- time sweeper. I also find that the DisciplinaryAuthority has taken lenient view in awarding punishment under clause 6 ( c ) of the memorandum of settlement vide Ext . 30/1 . It is evident that the delinquent workınan was found guilty of gross misconduct , in that view ofthe matter the Disciplinary Authority might have misappropriated customers money amounting to Rs . 600 received by you for depositing in customers account . Para 2 of the charge sheet speaks the aforesaid acts involving dishonesty on your part amounts to gross-misconduct in terms of clause 5 (j ) of the memorandum of settlement dated 10-04-2002 . The lawyer of the second party in his argument tried to convince that handing over ofthe money by the village postman on behalf of the account holders for depositing the same amount in the account holders account to the second party workman was not occurred in the bank premises rather had occurred outside the bank premises .But on careful consideration of Ext 9 , 10 and 11 in the true sense it is obvious that the village postman had handedover Rs . 300 each on two occasions to the concerned workman inside the bank premises in the earlier hour when the concerned workman was doing his sweeping services in the bank premises . So the handing over of the money amounting to Rs . 600 was made to the delinquent workman inside the bank premises and not outside the bank premises or elsewhere . Even the delinquent workman was in the part - time sweeping job but he was an employee of the bank and duty cast upon him to observe trust and honesty as that of other employees of the bank but such condemnable action on part of the delinquent workman in misappropriation ofthe amount which was not deposited in the account holders account entrusted to him clearly attracts clause 5 (j ) of the memorandum of settlement " doing an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank for gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss . From Ext . 14 the inquiry proceedings dated 26-12-2003 , it appears that first day of inquiry sittings was intimated also to the chargesheeted employee along with P.O. to be heid on 15 January, 2004 at 11 a.m. at Mahijada Branch. The proceeding of the inquiry officer dated 5-1-2004 clearly go to show that the chargesheet was explained to that the delinquent workman with his defence representative Mr. Dave General Secretary were present on 5-01-2004 and that the chargesheet was explained to the delinquent workman and after fully understanding the contents of the chargesheet the delinquent was asked whether he admits the charges as levelled against him then the delinquent workman admitted the charges levelled against him, thereafter delinquent workman submitted his written representation on 5-1-2004 on that day. It was also taken onthe record ofthe inquiry. Since the delinquent workman had admitted chargesheet levelled against him inquiry concluded on 5-1-2004 there is written admission of the delinquent workman submitted before the inquiry officer admitting that he had utilized the amount of Rs . 600 handed over to him for deposit in the account holders account by the village postman J.S. Zala also admitting that the village postman had given him Rs . 300 each on two occasions for depositing the same in the said S.B. Account and that he did not deposite the said amount of Rs . 600 so received [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1687
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
sweeping job and also admitting his guilt voluntarily on two occasions in the preliminary inquiry vide Exts . 9 and 10 and on 5-1-1999 in the sitting of the inquiry admitting the charges submits separate application admitting the guilt of using the money for his own purpose and not deposing the same in the account holders account.
14. On the other hand learned counsel appearing for the first party bank Mrs. Meena ben Shah has relied upon a case laws of Akhilesh Kumar Singh and State of Jharkhand and Others (2008 ) ( 116 ) FLR 404 SC. The case ofDamoh Panna Sagar Rural Regional Bank and others andMunna Lal Jain ( 2005) ( 1 ) LLN 662 SC and the case of PraveenBhatia and Union of India and Others (2009) ( 121) FLR 391 SC , which go to support the case of the first party in the instant case that when the disciplinary authority has passed the punishment order having no scope for making any interference by the Labour Court/Tribunal then in that case the Labour Court or Tribunal cannot invoke jurisdiction under section 11 ( A) of ID Act for making alteration in the punishment order so imposed or even to set aside the punishment order.
awarded the punishment under clause 6 (a) regarding dismissal without notice or under 6 (b) or might have passed order as to removal from service with superannuation benefit i.e. pension and or/Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the rules in regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment. I find that Disciplinary Authority has opted to award punishment under clause 6 (c ) as to punishment of compulsory retirement from banks services with immediate effect with superannuation benefits i.e. pension or/P.F and gratuity as would be due otherwise under the rules or regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment . So , I find that the punishment awarded to the delinquent workman is not shockingly disproportionate to the gross misconduct which has been proved during the domestic inquiry. I also find that the disciplinary authority has taken lenient view. More so , the awarding of such punishment by the disciplinary authority vide order dated 28-02-2004 has not caused economic death ofthe delinquent workman so I do not find any ground for interfering in the order of punishment.
15. As per discussions and considerations made above I find and hold that the management of bank has conducted domestic inquiry following principle of natural justice against the second party delinquent workman . I further find and hold that the order of punishment dated 28-02-2004 is not at all harash or shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct proved against the second party workman . Issue no . III is decided in affirmative and issue No. IV is decided in negative.
16. ISSUE NOS . V & VI
In view of the findings given in the foregoing para while deciding issue No. III & IV, I further find and hold that the demand of the union bank of India staff union Ahmedabad for reinstatement of Shri M.D. Makwana ex part time sweeper w.e.f. 28-02-2004 with continuity of service and consequential benefits by the management of bank of India Zonal Office Ahmedabad is not at all proper and justified . Rather I find and hold that the punishment awarded to the second party workman vide punishment order dated 28-04-2004 is proper, valid and justified . I further find and hold that the second party workman/ union isnot entitled to get any relief in this case . Issue Nos . V & VI are decided against the second party workman.
17. ISSUE NOS . I , II & VII
In view ofthe findings in the foregoings as to issue Nos . III , IV, V, VI , I further find and hold that the reference is not maintainable and the workman/union has no valid cause of action to raise the Industrial Dispute against the orderofcompulsory retirement of the delinquent workman vide Disciplinary Authority punishment order dated 28-02-2004. In such view of the matter the reference is dismissed on contest . However no order as to any cost .
BINAY KUMAR SINHA , Presiding Officer 13. The case law relied upon by Shri B.K. Oza learned counsel appearing for the second party workman in the case of Glaxo Laboratories (1 ) Limited and Labour Court, Meerut, and others reported in 1984 ( I) LLJ Page 16 and the case of Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Simla and Others V/ s . Presiding Officer reported in 1981 LAB I.C. 356 H.P. High Court are not at all applicable in the instant case , for such support that handing over of the money of Rs . 600 by the village postman on behalf ofthe account holder of Mahijada branch to be deposited in the account holders account was occurred outside the bank premises rather in the first hour when the second party workman was sweeping bank premises the amount of Rs . 300 each on two occasions was handed over to him inside Bank premises so it cannot be said that the handing over of the amount was made elsewhere and outside the bank and that in that way nowhere workman violated any provision ofarticle 5 of the memorandum of understanding particularly clause 5 (j ) doing an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank for gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss . Instead the action on part of delinquent workman in misappropriating the amount entrusted to him for depositing in the account holders account at Mahijada Bankbranch where he was working clearly speaks a volume that the delinquent workman had misappropriated the said amount handedover to him inside Bank's premises and used same amount for his own purpose . Thus the account holders faith in the bank had been shaken resulting in submitting a complaint regarding non deposit of the amount in the said account and the bank manager has to face such a nightmare for restoring the faith of the customers in the bank, taking steps to departmental inquiry against the second party workman who was in
651Gl/13-19 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
AWARD PART - II
नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2013
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L- 31012 / 16 /2001 - IR (M) , dated 05-03-2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
का.आ. 521.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स मुम्बई पोस्टस्ट, मुम्बई के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों कच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 28/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-01-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -31012/16/2001- आईआर ( एम) ] जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव
"Whether the action of the management ofMumbai Port Trust in terminating the services of Shri Vilas Janrao Ingale , Ex - Security Guard w.e.f. 7-2-1998 by way of dismissal is legal and justified? If not , what relief he is entitled to ? "
New Delhi , the 4th February, 2013
S.O. 521. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 28/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Mumbai Port Trust (Mumbai ) and workman , which was received by the Central Overnment on 24-1-2013 .
[No. L- 31012/ 16/2001 - IR (M) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
2. The second party workman was serving as Security Guard with first party w.e.f. 14-10-1982 . He was suspended w.e.f. 9-10-1992 and disciplinary proceeding was initiated against him . In the departmental inquiry the Inquiry Officer held the second party guilty ofmisconduct for committingtheft of a car which falls under Regulation 3 (1) ofBombay Port Trust Employees Conduct Regulation, 1976. The Inquiry Officer has submitted his report and after giving an opportunity of being heard, the management has dismissed the second party employee from the services . The second party workman raised industrial dispute. As matter could not be settled , thus as per the report of ALC ( C) , Labour Ministry sent the reference to this Tribunal . My Ld. Predecessor recorded the evidence ofpart - I Award.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI
Present : Shri K. B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT - 2 /28 of 2002
He held that the inquiry was fair and proper . He also held that the findings of the IO are not perverse . This Part - II award is in respect of quantum ofpunishment and to decide following remaining issues:
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST
Issues
Sr. No.
Findings
TheChairman,
Mumbai Port Trust Shoorji Vallabhdas Road Ballard Estate Mumbai 400 038 .
Yes.
3. Whether action of management of Mumbai Port Trust in terminating the services of Shri Vilas Janrao Ingale , Ex - Security Guard w.e.f. 7-2-1998 by way of dismissal is legal and justified?
AND There Workman
No relief.
4. Whatrelief the workman is entitled to?
REASONS
Issue Nos . 3 & 4 :--
Shri Vilas Janrao Ingale , Ex - Security Guard, Matunga Labour Camp Building No. 1 (1960) R. No.4, Dr. AmbedkarMarg , Matunga, Mumbai 400 019 .
APPEARANCES :
: Mr. M. B. Anchan , Advocate .
Forthe Employer
For the Workmen : Mr. Abhay Kulkarni &
Mrs. Pooja Kulkarni , Advocates .
3. In the case at hand the Ld. Adv. for the second party submitted that though the workman is held guilty for theft it was the first incident of misconduct . Furthermore the theft was not in the premises of the first party. Therefore according to him punishment of termination of service is shockingly disproportionate and some lesser punishment would have sufficed the purpose .
Mumbai , dated the 26th November , 2012 1689
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
In support of his argument Ld. Adv. resorted to Bombay High Court ruling in Ramakrishna Shivram Gadekar V/s . Board ofTrustees of the Port ofMumbai and anr. reported in 2009 III CLR 866 wherein the workman was involved in a case for abetment of theft. The criminal case was also pending before Magistrate . Magistrate had acquitted the workman from the charges of theft . The Industrial Tribunal heldthat charges are proved in the DE, however reinstated the workman without back- wages . Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court held that the Industrial Tribunal was not justified whether the trial Court honourably acquitted the workman or not and remanded the matter back for back wages . According to him the ratio laid down is squarely attracted to the case at hand.
4. The Ld . Adv . further submitted that the incident oftheft had occurred outside the premises of employer. It has no concern with the business of the employer. In the circumstances employer has no power to initiate disciplinary action against the workman . According to him penal law of land would take its own course . In this respect the Ld. Adv. for the first party submitted that, in that case workman therein was involved in a case of abetment of theft. He was acquitted. Furthermore in reference Tribunal held that the dismissal of appellant was illegal and passed the award for his reinstatement but without back wages . Single Judge of Hon'ble High Court dismissed the petition ofthe appellant challenging the denial ofback wages. The Division Bench held that the Ld . Single Judge was not justified in examining as to whether acquittal was clean or was on account of benefit of doubt. In view of the observation of the criminal court on the identification of the appellant, the Hon'ble Court held that the workman was entitled for reinstatement and back wages and remanded the matter for considering the quantum ofback wages. In that case the workman was involved in a case of abetment of theft and he was acquitted in the criminal case . However in the case at hand workman herein was involved in theft of a car. Though he claims that he was acquitted, he has not filed the copy of the Judgement of the Criminal Court. On the other hand according to the first party the workman was convicted in that case . In this respect, I would like to point out that facts of the case at hand are quite different than the above referred case. Here the workman is involved in serious case of theft ofa motor car. Though it is out ofpremises it is an offence relating to moral turpitude . It is a matter ofcommon- sense that a thief cannot be appointed or allowed to be served as a Security Guard. Abetment of theft is quite different than committing theft. The inquiry officer here in had held the workman guilty and in part 1st Award the Inquiry was held fair and proper and findings of the Inquiry Officer are held not perverse. Therefore ratio laid down in the above ruling would not be attracted to the set of facts of the present case.
5. TheLd Adv. for the second party on the point also resorted to the ruling of Apex Court in Glaxo Laboratories (I ) Ltd. V/ s . Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut reported in 1984 I LLJ 16 wherein it is categorically held that in the guise of rules and regulations the employer cannot be allowed to have more powers than the State and impose its Will /Rules and Regulations upon the employees even outside the employers premises . As against this the Ld . Adv. for the first party submitted that facts of the above referred case are altogether different than the case at hand. In that case the striking workmen alleged to have assaulted a driver who was carrying non- striking workmen . The said incident took place outside the premises and as per Standing Orders it does not come in the definition of mischief. However in the case at hand , he pointed out that the workman herein was involved in a case oftheft . The workman is working as a Security Guard. His involvement in a theft case though outside the premises involves him in offence related to moral turpitude. Therefore ratio laid down in the above referred case is not attracted to the set of facts of the present case.
6. In the case at hand the workman herein is involved inan offence of theft of a car. It relates to the offence of moral turpitude. In the circumstances though the offence oftheft is committed outside the premises , the seriousness of offence remains the same . A Security Guard is not expectedto commit a theft and a thief cannot be appointed as a Security Guard. He was involved in an offence relating to moral turpitude . Therefore the Tribunal need not interfere in the punishment of termination awarded by the management. The workman was also expected to produce the judgment of the criminal court . However he has not produced the same . In this respect the law is well settled that, standard of proof in criminal cases is altogether different than that of in departmental inquiry . In departmental inquiry charges need not be proved beyond reasonable doubt as required in the criminal trials . Preponderance of probability suffices the purpose to hold a person guilty in Departmental Inquiry. In the circumstances even acquittal in the criminal case as discussed herein above would not extend any help to the workman. In this backdrop I hold that, the punishment of dismissal is legal and justified and cannot be said shockingly disproportionate . Accordingly I decide this issue No. 3 in the affirmative . As a result I hold that workman is not entitled to any relief. I therefore, decide this issue No. 4 in the negative and I proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
Reference stands rejected with no order as to cost .
Date: 26-11-2012
Κ. Β . ΚΑΤΑΚΕ , Presiding Officer [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2013
10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L-29012/8/2012 - IR (M) , dt . 4-6-2012
SCHEDULE
"Whether the termination of employment through contractor in MECON Ltd. , w.e.f. 1-5-2011 in respect of Shri Basant Tirkey, Ex . Unskilled Mazdoor by the M/ s . Eskay Enterprises , contractor is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to ? " का.आ. 522.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ईस्के इन्टरप्राईजस ठेकेदार मेकान लिमिटेड रांची के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 2 धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 37/2012 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-1-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -29012/ 8/2012- आई आर (एम ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 4th February, 2013
2. Neither workman Basant Tirkey, Ex . - Unskilled Mazdoor appeared nor any written statement filed on his behalf, but Md . Sadique Ahmed, the Ld . Advocate for the management appeared and submitted that the workman had filed a petition under his own signature personaly, submitting for passing " No dispute Award " on the ground thathe did not want to contest this Reference Case for his personal and domestic reasons and the petiton was filed on 21-11-12 by him.
S.O. 522. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No.2 , Dhanbad , as now shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M /s . Eskay Enterprises , Contractor of MECON Ltd. ( Ranchi ) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-1-2013 .
3. Perused the case record . It is clear that the workman himselfhad filed his own petition on 21-11-2012 with aprayer to pass 'No dispute Award ' , as he did not want to contest itfor his personel domestic reason . The present Reference relates to the issue about the termination of his employment through contractor MECON Ltd, with effect from 1-5-2011 . In view of the submission of the workman , the case is closed and accordingly an order of No industrial Dispute is passed.
[No. L- 29012/8 /2012 - IR (M) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE
नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2013
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 )(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947
Reference No. 37 of 2012
का.आ. 523.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 1 धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 153/1991 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-1-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of M/s. Eskay Enterprises , Contractor of MECON Ltd. (Ranchi ) Jharkhand and their workman .
[सं. एल-12011 /39/91- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
APPEARANCES :
New Delhi , the 4th February, 2013
Onbehalfof the workman : None
Onbehalf of the management : Md . Sadique Ahmed, Ld. Advocate.
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 14th December, 2012
S.O. 523. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 153 / 1991 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court - 1 , Dhanbad , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-1-2013 .
AWARD
[No. L- 12011 /39/ 91 - IR ( B - II ) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section [ भाग II---खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1691
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
ANNEXURE
New Delhi , the 4th February, 2013
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , DHANBAD IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/ S 10( 1 ) (D) (2A) OF I.D. ACT, 1947 .
Ref. No. 153 of 1991
Employers in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda AND
S.O. 524. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes theAward (Ref. No. 99/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 2, Dhanbad , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Dena Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-1-2013 .
Their workmen
Present : Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran , Presiding Officer
[No. L- 12012/191 /92- IR (B- II ) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
Appearances :
ANNEXURE
:None
For the Employers .
For the workman
:None
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , AT DHANBAD State : Jharkhand .
PRESENT : Shri KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer Industry: Coal.
Dated, 18-01-2013
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947
AWARD
Reference No. 99 of 2004
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Dena Bank , Calcutta and their workman
APPEARANCES :
By order No.L- 12011 /39/91 - IR (B -II) , dt. 17-12-1991, the Central Government in the Ministry of labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal :
Onbehalf of the workman
SCHEDULE
: Sri B. Prasad, Rep. of the workman
Onbehalfofthe management: Sri D. K. Verma , Ld. Advocate .
State: Bihar/Bengal
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in not paying Agriculture Assistant Allowance to Sh . G.. S. Pathak is justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to ? "
Industry: Banking
Dated, Dhanbad, the 26th December, 2012
AWARD
After receipt of the reference , both parties are noticed. They filed their respective written statement and counter. Butinspite of notice afresh , to the parties , none appears . In the meantime 21 years have already been elapsed . It is felt , there is no dispute between the parties
Hence No Dispute award passed. Communicate to theMinistry.
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L- 12012/191 / 92- IR ( B - 2) dated the 29th October, 1992 .
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2013
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Dena Bank of depriving Shri Birendra Kumar Rajak from the opportunities of permanent service in the Bank is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled to ? י
का.आ. 524.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 2 धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 99/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-1-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/191/92- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी
2. The case of the workman Birendra Kumar Rajak as sponsored by the Dena Bank Employees Congress (Bihar State) is that he is a Schedule Caste Candidate . He had joined as a Badli Sepoy in the Dena Bank , Bhagalpur Branch on 14-01-1980 on daily rated basis at [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1034
1692
Rs . 15 for full day from 10 a . m. to 10.30 pm. He was weekly paid his wages through vouchers as per starting scale of the subordinate . He signed the Attendance Register as per the new panel . He continued to work at the Branch from 14th January, 1980 to 10th November , 1991 as a Badli Sepoy as per the appointment letters of ten issued by the Bank Management. He was employed at Rarhiya Branch , under District Deoghar (Bihar) from 11th to 12th December, 1991 . He served as a Badli Sepoy for about 12 years . His working days detail as such : 56, 181 , 38 , 19 , 53 and 71 days in the years 1980, 1987-91 respectively total 418 days .
it as an industrial dispute . There is no statutory provision to appoint a person . Only when his name is sponsored by a particular Employment Exchange nor Selection of condidiate for employment only on the ground as mandatory. Such selection is voilative of Art . 14 and 16 of the Constitutution of India . The management has failed to state the moade of appointment/engagement of workman . The Industrial Dispute Act provides for conceptual frame work for creation of entities and determination of mutual rights and obligations in order to achive legislative object. The Bankmanagement can not restrict employment on the basis ofjurisdiction of Employment Exchange.
5. Whereas the contra pleaded case of the Bank management into three parts A. B and C related to its preliminary objection against maintainability etc , true relevant facts and replies to the allegation of the Union respectively is that the reference is lack of ingedits of demand and refusal for the Industrial Dispute u/s 2 K of the I. D. Act . , 1947 is misconceived . Any controversy within the mischief of Sec . 36 A of the I.D. Act referrable , but not as I.D. As per the terms of the para 18(4 ) of the Bipartite, Settlement dt . 10-4-89 binding both the parties at industry level , subject to Bank's recruitment rules , preference will be given to permanent part time employees drawing scale wages in filling of full time conversion in the same cadre, other things being equal . The Bank Management has already a large number of such part time employees at the branches under the control of its Regional Office , Calcutta. The persons sponsored by the Local Employment Exchange as called for by the Branch Management are interviewed in order of merit for filling up temporary or permanent vacancies likely under the Local Employment Exchange . When the regular employees proceed on leave etc, the aforesaid empanelled are called and engaged in such, purely leave vacancies , and their services automatically cease and when the regular incumbents resume their duties after their leave .
Sri B. K. Rajak was intermittently engaged for odd jobs as per clause 20.7 of the First Bipartitie Settlement dt 19-10-1966 . In lack of permanent subordinate , the management in administrative exigencies provided on temporary basis budlees on rotation to work as Budlee Cleaner cum Sepoy at our Rarhia Branch . Sri Rajak in the process was engaged for 30 days from 11-11-1991 to 10-12-1991 . His such engagement in Bhagalpur Branch as per the Bank Record details that he accordingly worked for 46, 38, 38 , 19, 46 and 41 days in the years 1980 , 1987 to 1991 respectively, thus he never continuously worked for 90 or 240 days in any year .
3. Further it is alleged on behalf of the Union that on the representation for his absorption, the workman was interviewed in 1986 , re - elected as a Badli Sepoy against the Schedule Caste quota , and empanelled in the subordinate list , as he had stood first in the interview. A new rural Branch at Rarhiya , Distt : Deoghar (Bihar) was opened in March, 1991. The workman being fully qualified and Senior most Badli Sepoy in the panel of Schedule Caste had represented on 21st June , 1991 for his permanent absorption . While representing, he apprehended of one Sri , Mahesh Rajak , a General Candidate from Jamshedpur being considered for permanent absorption against the vacancy earmarked for Schedule Caste , he had also informed and requested the management on 21-6-1989 for through enquiry into the pretension of aforesaid Mahesh Rajak as Schedule Caste Candidate in order to get the job ofPeonpermanently at Rarhiya Branch, Deoghar (Bihar) . Even then the Bank Management decided to absorb Sri Mahesh Rajak at Rarhiya Branch . Then the Union for the workmen represented before the Conciliation Officer on2-7-1991 for redressal of his grivance . In course of the Conciliation proceeding , the Bank Management by shifting its stand appointed the workman at Rarhiya Branch , from 11th November to 10th December, 1991 . Despite presentation of the Union about non - regularisation ofone Sri Dilip Kumar , a part time sweeper, who worked for 13 years , during which six Badlies were regularised and 41 subordinate were taken from Badli Panel of Calcutta region for full time in the year 1988 ignoring the part time employees in addition to 21 candidates during 1980 to 1989 as the instances of the discriminatory policy adopted by the Bank management in the matter in Bihar State , the failure of the conciliation proceding resulted in the reference for an adjudication . As such the action of the Bank Management is malafide , arbitrary and malicious with anulterior motive to illegally and unfairly deny the claim ofthe workman for absorption in the Bank's services , as he is entitled to permanent regularistion in it as a subordinate staff.
6. Further case of the Management is that the Bipartite Settlementdt . 19-10-1966 as amended was entered into by and between the Banks including Dena Bank and their workmen u/ s 52 (p) read with Sec . 18 ( i ) of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 read with Rule 58 of the 4. The Union for the workman in its rejoinder with specific denials has pleaded that once a reference is validity made by the appropriate Govt , the Tribunal is to adjudicate [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1693 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
was not regularised whereas some workmen , namely, Amit Kumar at the Begusarai Branch was regularised ( on unpleaded fact) , so he raised the industrrial dispute for permanent absorption.
Industrial Dispute Control Rules 1957. The Rarhia Branch, a newly opened branch in Bihar State comes under the jurisdiction of the local Employment Exchange at Deogarh (Bihar) whereas Sri B. K. Rajak has been sponsored by the Employment Exchange , Bhagalpur. Therefore , his name cannotbe considered for the vacancy in subordinate cadre in Rarhia Branch and the vacancy thereof will be filled up by converting the existing part timers from Bihar State/ Region as full time subordinate as per rules . As such the claim of Sri B. K. Rajak is unsustainable as baseless . There is no question of discriminatory treatment on the part ofthe Bank in view of the above facts . So the workman is not entitled to any relief.
But the workman has clearily admitted in his cross para that he was factually interviewed for the post of Badli Sepony; (Ext . W.1 formal ) whenever he was engaged, it was as per the letters for temporary period as evident from his ten letters issued to him during the years 1987 , 1988 , 1990 and 91 ( Extt . W.2 to 11 fromal proof waived) against a purely temporary vacancy of " Leave " . Admitting hiswritten statement para 8 as correct related to off and on hisworking for 56, 181 , 38,19, 53 , 71 days in the year 1980, 1987 to 1991 respectively but for 1981 to 1986 available the workman has obviously admitted to have not continuously served the management from 1980 to 2005, rather he served intermittently or occasionally whenever required. not 7. The management in its supplementary writter has alleged that one Sri Kamal was selected and appointed as per letter No. 208/99 dt . 17-03-1994 of the A.G.M. (Regional Office , Calcutta against one vacancy of Scheduled Tribe category in full time subordinate cadre under the special Recruitments drive 1993 as communicated by the Bank's Head Office letter No. RECTT/903 dt. 1-9-1993 and Dy. G. M. (P & C ) ' s letter No. 909 dt . 1-9-1993 in respect of direct recruitment either from the approved panel , if any or through employment exchange . There was no panel for Sepoy/ subordinate staff within the jurisdiction of Deoghar District Employment Exchange under which Rarhiya Branch falls . The names as called for were received from Deoghar Employment Exchange , and as per the Bank & rule of recruitment aforesaid Kamal was appointed . No vacancy exists in the subordinate cadre in Bhagalpur Region or in Bihar State . Rarhiya Branch falls in the state of Jharkhand . So claimant Sri B. K. Rajak is not entitled any relief.
The workman in its reply petition has specifically stated all the statements of the management as irrelevant to it , as it relates to deprivation of his permanent absorption.
Finding with Reasonings
8.Inthe reference case , WWI Birendra Kumar Rajak , the workman himself for the Union and MWI Anup Ghosh, Branch Manager , Dena Bank, Dhanbad Branch for the management have been examined.
9. Whereas MWI Anup Ghosh , the Branch Manager , Dena Bank , Dhanbad Branch on the basis of the file ofthe workman has stated that he was temporarily engaged as Badli Sepoy by the Branch Manager concerned ; Badli Sepoy is sometimes regularised by the it or in case of vacancy for the Sub Staff. The witness though could not assert the member of the working days of the workman, year surely did that he never worked for 240 days in year . continous . Admittedly the workman was an empanelled one for Badli Subordinate as per the letterdt . 12-6-1987 (Ext. W.12) as already marked as Ext.M.3 which bears the name of the workman Birendra Kumar Rajak under Sl . No. 1 ( of Panel of Scheduled Caste Candidates . The panel refers to the names of the candidates selected as Badled Subordinates who may be appointed from time to time on leave vacancies , as well as the proforma enclosed herewith may be utilised in respect of their temporary appointment . According to the management witness (MW.I ) the Panel is prepared after calling for the names of candidates ( from the Employment Exchanges concerned) and holding their interview. The extracts of Bipartite Settlementdt . 10-4-89dt. 19-10-66 , waiting panel Listof candidates for appointments at Bhagalpur Branch (Centre) , the guidelines for recruitment of Subordinate cadre and preparation of Waiting panel Lists , and guidelines for absorpation of Part-time. Subordinate as Full time subordinates produced on behalf of the management have beenmarked as Ext.M.1 to M.5 ( on formal proof waived) respectively.
10. In view of the aforesaid discussed facts of both the parties and hearing the arguments Mr. B. Prasad, the UnionRepresentative for the workman and Mr. D. K. Verma , the Ld. Adv. for the management , I find the following facts:
The statement of WWI Birendra Kumar Rajak , the workman himself is that he though worked as a peon at Dena Bank, Bhagalpur from 14-1-1980 to 2005 at the rate of wage Rs . 20 per day paid by the vouchers under the management by performing various kinds of jobs such taking out and putting the ledgers to closure of the Bank as per the direction of the manager or the Accountant , on sending his name by the Employment Exchange concerned, he was interviewed on 24-12-86 by the Management for the post of Peon , and was also issued time to time letters for the job ; the Dena Bank of Bhagalpur had prepared a panel ofworkmen including him for regularisation, yet he 1694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 / PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
(i) WorkmanBirender Kumar Rajak was admittedly not a regular employee of the Bank rather he was purely temporarily engaged as Badli Sepoy at Bhagalpur Branch of the Bank against the leave vacancies intermittently in the year 1987, 1990, 1991. Thus he has never completed 240 days working in any of the years ;
(ii ) The workman could not be able to substantiate his case of deprivation of his opportunity by the Management for the permanent service in the Bank concerned because his unpleaded evidence about the regularisation of one Amit Kumar at Begusarai Branch of the Management is not admissible .
Under these circumstances it can be formaly held that no question whatsoever arises as to the action of the management of Dena Bank of depriving Shri Birender Kumar Rajak from the opportunities of permanent service inthe Bank justified. Hence the workman is not entitled to any relief. However , in view of his intermittent service as Badli Subordinate and being a Scheduled Caste candidate, theManagement of the Bank would consider his case for hisregularisation against any vacancy under it subject to the rules of the Bank .
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 525. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी/82/ 2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-01-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/143/93- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
NewDelhi , the 4th February, 2013
S.O. 525.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ NGP/ 82/ 2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of UCO Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-01-2013 .
[No. L- 12012/ 143/ 93 - IR( B - II) ]
SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ⅱ) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No. CGIT/NGP/ 82/ 2003
Date: 11-01-2013
PartyNo. 1
108, Sushil Bhawan ,. Balraj Marg,
The Divisional Manager , UCO Bank , Dhantoli , Nagpur-440012.
Versus
Party No. 2
UCO Bank Employees Association Plot No. 48 , " Kanchan Prabha" 48 , Tatya Tope Nagar , Nagpur- 440016.
AWARD
(Dated: 11th January, 2013)
Inexercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) (" the Act " in short) , the Central Government had referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of UCO Bank and their workman , Shri V.R. Wanjari , to Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur for adjudication , as per letter No.L- 12012/ 143/93 - IR ( B - II ) dated 15-02-1994 , with the following schedule:-
"Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank , Nagpur in terminating the services of Shri V. R. Wanjari , Peon with effect from 30-10-1990 isjustified? Ifnot , what relief is the workman entitled to?"
Subsequently, the case was transferred to this Tribunal for adjudication in accordance with law.
2. On receipt of the reference , the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly , the workman , Shri V. R. Wanjari , ( " the workman " in short ) , filed the statement of claim through the union , " UCO Bank Employees Association " , (" the union " in short ) and the management of UCO Bank , ( " Party No. 1 " in short ) filed its written statement .
The case of the workman as presented by the union in the statement of claim is that it (union) is a registered [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1695
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
orderof termination and for reinstatement of the workman in service with continuity, back wages and all other consequential benefits .
3. The party no . 1 in their written statement have pleaded inter- alia that in circular dated 31-03-1990 , it was provided that persons working on daily wages basis in the branch would be absorbed in their permanent service and there was bipartite settlement on 12-10-1989 , bywhich, norms were fixed including the eligibility of the persons who would be absorbed in the service and the mode and manners of absorption and the workman did not fulfill the eligibility as provided in the settlement and the workman wasworking in Sirsi branch as a casual worker and he was not required for the whole day and he was not in their employment and he was not their employee , so there was no question of his termination and he was not a workman and on the basis of settlement dated 19-10-1989 , circular dated 31-03-1990 was issued and the settlement is binding onthem and their employees including the workman and as the workman was not their employee , there was no question ofhis illegal termination and the workman is not entitled to any relief.
4. In the rejoinder, it is pleaded by the union that the party no . 1 has submitted a vague reply, only to reduce the gravity of the complaint.
union and the service conditions of the employees of party no. 1 are governed by the provisions of Bipartite Settlement and the circulars issued by the Head Office of party no . 1 to regulate the provisions of service conditions , which could not be covered in the Bipartite settlement and vide circular no . CHO/ PAS/4/ 90 dated 31st March , 1990 , Head office of party no . 1 made it clear that the persons who were engaged on daily wages basis in the bank branches would be absorbed in permanent employment of the Bank , depending upon the workload of the Branch and the workman was initially appointed on 12-10-1986 at Sirsi Branch @ Rs . 7 per day, which gradually came to be increased to Rs.10 per day and then to Rs.12 per day and the workman was not being paid wages for Sundays and holidays and he was put to hard labour beyond the working hours and he continued to work till 30th October, 1990 , on which date , he was removed from employmentby the Manager of the said branch , without assigning any reason and in place of the workman , another daily wager came to be appointed in the said branch and there was no need for the Branch Manager to remove the workman from the job , particularly when there was no peon in that branch and thus justifiedly, there was need of a peon and the work and conduct of the workman was satisfactory and he was instrumental in bringing handsome deposits to the Branch .
5. Besides placing reliance on documents , both the parties have led oral evidence in support oftheir respective claims. The union has examined the workman as a witness , where as , one Kawadu S. Dekate has been examined as a witness by the party no.1 .
The workman in his examination- in-chief, which is on affidavit has stated that he was appointed on 12-10-1986 on daily wages basis by the party no . 1 and worked at Sirsi Branch till 30-10-1990 as a peon and the Manager also issued a certificate to that effect on 09-01-1988 . The workman has further stated that he was not a minor at the time of his initial appointment , since his date ofbirth is 12-10-1968 and his first appointment was on 12-10-1986 and on the date of his appointment , he had just completed 18 years of age . In his cross - examination , the workman has denied that he started working with the Bank on24-04-1986.
The further case of the workman as presented by the union is that the workman approached it ( union) and a conciliation proceedings was filed before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Nagpur ( " the ALC " in short) and during the conciliation , party no . 1 took the plea that since on the date of his first engagement , the workman was a minor , he was not entitled for absorbtion in permanent employment and the alleged settlement between it and the party no.1 was arrived at in 1989 and that settlement could not be given a retrospective effect as in 1989, the workman had already attained majority and the workman infact had completed his 18 years of age in 1986 it self, but subsequent to his appointment and thus , in 1990, when he was illegally terminated , he was 22 years of age and he was entitled to be absorbed in the employment of party no . 1 and the impugned termination isprima facie bad and illegal and there was no reason to terminate his services and therefore , the order of termination is liable to be set aside .
It isalso pleaded by the union that the termination of the workman was made without any departmental enquiry and the workman had been serving the party no . 1 continuously for four years and he had assumed the status ofa permanent employee , hence , he could not have been thrown out of the employment , without due process of law.
Prayer has been made to quash and set aside the
6. The examination - in -chief of the witness examined on behalf of the party no . 1 is on affidavit and he has reiterated the facts mentioned in the written statement . However, in his cross -examination, this witness has admitted that the affidavit filed by him was prepared by the zonal office of the Bank and he does not know the contents of the affidavit and he is working as a cashier at Sirsi Branch and the workman was working at Sirsi branch and he was engaged on daily wages basis on 12-10-1986 and he was terminated from service on 30-10-1990 and he was making payment of wages to the workman on vouchers .
651GI/13-20 1696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
7.At the time of argument , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the workman that it is clear from the evidence on record including the admission of the witness examined on behalf of the party no . 1 that the workman was appointed on 12-10 . - 1986 by the party no . 1 and he worked as a peon in Sirsi continuously till 30-10-1990 i.e. for a period ofmore than four years and on 30-10-1990, the services of the workman were terminated by party no . 1 , without any reason and as per the circular dated 31-03-1990, issued by the party no . 1 , which was based on the settlement dated 12-10-1989 , the workman was entitled for absorption on permanent basis , but the party no . 1 instead of absorbing the workman on permanent basis , terminated his services and the workman was already 18 years of age on the date of his initial appointment i.e. 12-10-1986 , his date of birth being 12-10-1968 and such fact has been amply proved by the evidence on record including the admission of the witness for the party no.1 and as such , the termination of the services of the workman is illegal and unjust and therefore , the workman is . entitled for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages and for his absorption on permanent basis .
The learned advocate for the workman also alternatively submitted that as the workman had completed more than 240 , days of work in each year including the preceding 12 calendar months of the date of termination and the party No.1 did not comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act, before termination ofthe services of the workman , such termination is illegal and the termination of the workman amounts to retrenchment and on that ground also , the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages and absorption in permanent basis .
8. Per contra , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 that the claim of the workman as presented by the union is on the basis of the circular dated 31-03-1990 and the said circular was issued by party no . 1 on the basis of the terms of settlement dated 12-10-1989 , entered between the bank and the unions , for empanelment and absorption of persons engaged ondaily wages basis and in view of the terms of the said settlement, the workman applied to the bank for his empanelment and absorption on 30-11-1989 and in his application dated 30-11-1989 , which is on record, the workman had mentioned his initial date of engagement as daily wager as 24.04.1986 and after verifying the contents of the application submitted by the workman , the party no . 1 found that he was not eligible for empanelment and absorption in terms ofthe settlement dated 12.10.1989 , as he was a minor on the date of his first engagement in the bank i.e. on 24-04-1986 , his date of birth being 12-10-1968 and accordingly, the workman was informed about the same and the claim of the workman that his initial date of engagement was on 12-10-1986 does not hold any water. and moreover, the engagement of the workman by the
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
Bank Manager of the branch was not in accordance with the law and the procedure of appointment and as such , he isnot entitled for any relief, in view of the principles settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the decision reported in AIR - 2006 SC - 1806 ( Secretary , State of Karnatak Vs. Umadevi)
Itwas further submitted by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 that the workman in addition to his claim based on the circular dated 31-03-1990, has tried to make out a case of illegal termination on account of non- compliance of the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act, but in the entire statement of claim , there is no reference by the workman in regard to the same and no evidence has also been brought on record by the workman that he had worked for 240 days in the preceding 12 calendar months of the date of his alleged termination and therefore , there is no question of consideration of such plea taken by the workman and the workman is not entitled to any relief.
9. At the outset , I think it necessary to deal with the alternative argument advanced by the learned advocate for the workman in regard to the non - compliance of the provisions of Section 25 F of the Act , before termination of the services of the workman. In this regard, it is to be mentioned here that the learned advocate for the management has rightly pointed out that there is neither any pleading in the statement of claim nor any evidence on record to show that the workman had worked for 240 days in the preceding 12 calendar months of the date of alleged termination and in absence of such pleadings and evidence , such a plea cannot be.entertained . In absence of any pleading and evidence in respect of the non - compliance of the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Act, the submissions made by the learned advocate for the workman in that respect , cannot be entertained .
10. The main claim of the workman is based on the circular dated 31-03-1990 issued by the party no . 1. The party no . 1 has not disputed the issuance of the circular dated 31-03-1990 . On perusal of the circular dated 31-03-1990 , which is on record , it is found that the same was issued for the empanelment and absorption of persons engaged on daily wage basis in terms of settlement dated 12-10-1989 . It is also found from the materials on record that there is no dispute between the parties about the settlement dated 12-10-1989 . On perusal of the settlement dated 12-10-1989, it is found that one of the eligibility criteria for such empanelment and absorption of the casual workers on permanent basis was that " such casual worker should have satisfied the normal stipulation in the Bank regarding age, namely, minimum 18 years and maximum 26 years on the date of his first engagement as casual worker. (In case of persons belongingto SC / ST categories relaxation in age as applicable to such categories shall be permitted)" 1697 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
that his initial date of engagement was 12-10-1986. The witness for the party no. 1 in his cross - examination has also stated that the workman was engaged on daily wages basis on 12-10-1986 and he was terminated from services on30-10-1990 .
Inthis case , the claim of the workman is that his first engagement with party no. 1 as casual worker was on 12-10-1986 and he was already 18 years of age on the first date of his engagement and as the other eligibility criteria were fulfilled, he is entitled for empanelment and absorption on permanent basis in the bank.
The party no. 1 has denied the claim ofthe workman . According to party no . 1 , the workman did not fulfill the eligibility as provided in the settlement dated 12-10-1989. It is to be mentioned here that though the workman has mentioned in the statement of claim that he was first engaged on 12-10-1986 , there is no specific denial in the written statement that the workman was not engaged on 12-10-1986 for the first time . There is also no specific pleading in the written statement that the workman was engaged for the first time on 24-04 . - 1986 and at that he was below 18 years of age , his date of birth being 12-10. -1986 and for that he was not eligible for empanelment and absorption. However , during the cross - examination of the workman , it was suggested that the workman was initially engaged on 24-04-1986, which was denied by him.
At this juncture , it is to be mentioned that it is settled beyond doubt that admitted facts need not be proved. In the statement of claim , though in paragraph three, it has been mentioned that the workman was initially engaged on 12-10-1986 by party no . 1 , in paragraph five , it is pleaded that, " the complainant union filed conciliation proceedings before that learned Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) , Nagpur. The respondent took a plea that since on the date of his first engagement , the worker was a minor and hence he is not entitled to be taken into permanent employment. In this context the complaint submits that the alleged settlement between this union and the management was arrived at in 1989 and that settlement could not be given retrospective effect as in 1989 the worked had attained majority. In fact it is submitted that the workers had completed his 18 years of age in 1986 it - self, but subsequent to his appointment . " Theabove statement clearly shows that the workman was below 18 years of age on the first date of his engagement with party no . 1 and he attained 18 years of age in 1986 it- self, but subsequent to his appointment . The above statement is a clear cut admission that on the date of the initial engagement of the workman with party no . 1 , he was below 18 years of age . It is also clear from such pleadings that the workman has not come up with clean hands to claim the reliefs . In view of such admission , no reliance can be placed on the oral evidence of the workman and so also the witness examined on behalf party no . 1 that the initial engagement of the workman was 12-10-1986 . It is also necessary to mention that as the settlementdated 12-10-1989 is a legal and valid settlement, the parties are bound by such settlement .
It is also necessary to mention here that when the reference was fixed for hearing of argument , the party no. 1 filed an application to take the application filed by the workman in terms of the settlement dated 19-10-1989 for absorption and the letters of the Bank in connection with the same on record and vide order dated 25-09-2012 , the said application, so far taking of the aforesaid documents was rejected . It is also to be mentioned here that the party no . 1 had approached the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench , Nagpur in writ petition No. 5964 of 2012 against the order dated 25-09-2012 and the High Court have been pleased to dismiss the writ petition . So , the submission made by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 to look into the said documents cannot be entertained and those documents cannot be considered .
As it is clear from the materials on record that the workman did not fulfill the eligibility criteria in regard to his age as he was below 18 years of age on the date of his initial appointment as casual worker, he was not entitled for empanelment and absorption on permanent basis in the services of the party no.1 , as per the circular dated 31-03-1990 and the party no. 1 did not commit any illegality in discontinuing him from services w.e.f. 30-10-1990 . Hence, it is ordered :-
ORDER
The action of the management of UCO Bank , Nagpur in terminating the services of Shri V. R. Wanjari , Peon with effect from 30-10-1990 is justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
J. P. CHAND , Presiding Officer 11. In view of the pleadings of the parties , the first and for-most question for consideration is as to whether the workman was below 18 years of age on the date of his first engagement with party no. 1 as a casual worker. At the cost of repetition , it is to be mentioned that in the statement ofclaim , the workman has pleaded that the date ofhis initial appointment was 12-10-1986 and in the written statement, the party no. 1 though has denied the pleadings in general , there is no specific denial in that regard and there is also no specific pleading that the initial date of engagement of the workman was 24-04-1986 . It is not disputed by the parties that the date of birth of the workman is 12-10-1986 . The workman has not produced anydocument in support of his claim that his initial date ofengagement with party no . 1 was 12-10-1986. However, in his evidence on affidavit , the workman has stated 1698
3 (ii) ]
[PART II-SEC .
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
नई दिल्ली , 5 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 526. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय-1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-1-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011 / 55/2002- आई आर ( बी- II) ] शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 5th February, 2013
S.O. 526. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.34/2011 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court- I , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 24-1-2013 .
[No. L- 12011/ 55/2002 - IR (B- II]
SHEESH RAM , Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI
I. D. No. 34/2011
TheDy. General Secy.
Workman CanaraBankWorkers Organisation, 2426/27 , Tilak Gali , PaharGanj , New Delhi - 110055
Versus
TheDy. General Manager , Canara Bank , Staff Section ( W) , Circle Office, Connaught Place , New Delhi .
...Management
AWARD
Daily wagers were engaged by Canara Bank (in short the bank) in its branches here at Delhi . Their engagements were made by the bank from time to time at different intervals . In 1986 daily wagers filed a writ petition being W.P. No.281/ 1986 before the Apex Court , seeking their absorption in service of the bank. The bank gave an undertaking before the Apex Court to the effect that the casual workers , who had completed 240 days of employment in a year, would be retained in service and considered for absorption as and when vacancy would arise .Accepting the undertaking , the Apex Court ordered that the daily wagers who had completed 240 days continuous service in a calendar year would be considered for regularization as and when vacancy arises . However, the Court made it clear that the action of regularization of service of those daily wagers would not cause any prejudice to rights of the workmen, who were originally in the employment of erstwhile Lakshmi Commercial Bank, which had merged with the bank. With that direction the writ petition was disposed of by the Apex Court on 8-9-1986
2.Amiscellaneous petition No.9289/1987 was moved before the Apex Court and the Court passed an order on 8-5-1987 wherein order lated 8-9-1986 was clarified to the effect that the casual workmen, who had completed 240days ofemployment in 12 calendar months , would have preference for absorption as and when vacancy arises . The first such daily wager would be entitled to be considered forthe first vacancy when it arises . The Court clarified that the order dated 8-9-1986 meant that the workmen would be retained in panel ofdaily wagers and thebank will consider such casual workmen for absorption as and when vacancy arises , in accordance with thepractice followed by them hereto before.
3.Another miscellaneous petition No.17984/ 1987 , moved by the casual labours before Apex Court, was disposed of vide order dated 21-8-1987 , wherein it was noticed by the Court that there was considerable dispute on the question as to whether orders dated 8-9-1986 and 8-5-1987 have been implemented by the bank . The Court was of the opinion that it was not possible to resolve that question in the proceedings pending Brfore it . The Court advised the casual workers to apply to the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , for a decision on the question, who will take evidence in the matter and arrive at a decision in that regard within a period of 3 months . In pursuance of the directions , so given by the Apex Court, the parties approached the Labour Commissioner , Delhi , who heard them at length . After taking into consideration all facts present before him , the Labour Commissioner disposed of the matter vide order dated 7-2-1989 , wherein he called upon the bank to make a realistic assessment of the workload in respect of its establishment of branches , extension and collection counters etc. in the Union Territory of Delhi and regular posts which would arise therein . He commanded that a time bound exercise of this nature would be done by the bank so that it may be able to specify numbers of regular subordinate staff required in its establishments in the Union Territory of Delhi . The bank was to absorb the workmen in terms of the undertaking furnishedby it to the Supreme Court and in the light of the orders dated 8-9-1986 and 8-5-1987 passed by the Court. The Labour Commissioner commanded that this exercise should be done within 4 months from the date ofhis order .
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1699
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
4. The bank conducted an exercise to ascertain existing strength of sub staff in its branches , extension counters and offices here in the Union Territory ofDelhi , besides its requirement . The bank wrote to the Labour Commissioner that as on 29-6-1989 requirement for number of sub staff, as per latest assessment , was 457 against existing strength of 479 and thus there were 22 persons surplus. The bank clarified that every endeavour would be made to confer permanent status on casual workers as soon as vacancy position improves . In view of that factual positions, laid before the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , the bank could not take immediate steps for conferment of permanent status on the casual workers . Aggrieved by that position, the casual workers approached Canara Bank WorkersOrganization (herein after referred to as the union) . The union raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since the bank projected that steps for conferment of permanent status would be taken as and when vacancy
SI . Name No.
Staff No.
would arise, it resulted in failure ofconciliation proceedings . Onconsideration of failure report , submitted by the ConciliationOfficer , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide order No.L- 12011 / 55/2002- IR(B - II ) , New Delhi dated 31-1-2003/ 10-2-2003 with following terms.
"Whether the action of management of Canara Bank innot absorbing Shri Ramesh Kumar and 20 others (list annexed) as per order dated 7-3-1989 of the Labour Commissioner, Delhi pursuant to the order dated8-9-1986 and 6-5-1987 ofthe Hon'bleApex Court inWrit petition No.281 / 1986 is justified ? If not , what relief are these workmen entitled and from which date?"
5. Claim statement was filed by the union pleading therein that the claimants were appointed by the bank in sub staff cadre as temporary employees on the dates and in the branches at Delhi as per informatión detailed below:-
Date of confirmation
Present branch/ office
Branch of initial appointment
Date of initial appointment
65445 May, 1984 1. Ramesh Kumar Dogra -
14-09-1995
Shaktinagar
2. Vijay Singh Chauhan 66167 31st May, 1985
IC & IF Section, DCO .
30-03-1996
Kamla Nagar
3. Surya Chandra
66172 21st May, 1985
Legal Section , DCO
30-03-1996
Gole Market
4. Jai Singh
66166 10th May, 1985
Special Review Section , DCO
30-03-1996
SS(O), DCO
5. Om Prakash
62546 02nd Fab . 1984
Staff Section (O) DCO
14-07-1993
S.D. Area
6. Ram Avilash
Ganesh Nagar, Delhi
28-02-1992
61821 18th Fab. , 1984 Kamla Nagar Parliament Street
7. Karan Singh 65482 06th June , 1984 Okhla Main 14-09-1995 Munirka, Delhi
8. Subhash Chandra 65481 06th June , 1984 Okhla Main 14-09-1995 Munirka, Delhi
9. Suman Kumar 66171 10th May, 1985 Shakti Nagar 30-03-1996 Munirka, Delhi
10. Johan Dass
14-09-1995
65443 07th Fab . , 1984 SS (W) , DCO GoleMarket, Delhi
11. Harish Chandra 65479 March , 1985 Parliament Street 14-09-1995 Overseas Main Branch Delhi
12. Ramesh Poojari 60022 02ndNov. , 1982 DDU Marg , C.Chest
19-09-1990
61517 09th June , 1983
JitSingh Marg, Delhi
09-06-1992
Fountain
13. Rajendra Kumar
Lajpat Nagar Delhi
14-09-1995
14. Kamal Singh 65448 10th June, 1984 Parliament Street Diplomatic Enclave Delhi 15. Dharam Pal 65447 04th June 1984 East ofKailash
14-09-1995
Diplomatic Enclave Delhi
13-07-1993
16. Bhagwan Singh 65624 3rd March, 1984 Kashmere Gate Quazi Hauz, Delhi 17. RameshwarDutt 59911 17th Dec. , 1982 Wazirpur 18-07-1990 Quazi Hauz, Delhi 18. Shiv Kumar Sharma 62622 15 March 1984 Wazirpur 07-07-1993
19. Mohan Chandra
Pitampura, Delhi
14-09-1995
Janpath
May, 1984
65450
Janpath, Delhi
09-06-1992
20. Surbir Singh Negi 60020 Dec. , 1982 QuaziHauz Wazirpur, Delhi 21. Dalip Singh 65449 May, 1984 Janpath 14-09-1995 C.S.S. , DCO .
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1700
to 11 years , till their absorption in service . After their absorption in service , no benefit of earlier temporary service was accorded to them. The action of the bank , in not regularizing their services up to 6th July , 1989 and not extending benefit of continuous temporary service prior to their absorption, is illegal and justified . The claimants are entitled to be treated as permanent employees with effect from 6-7-1989 with all usual benefits . The union claims that the bank should be directed to treat the claimants , referred above , as permanent employees with effect from July, 1989 with consequential benefits such as annual increments , leave and seniority etc. The bank be directed further to confer weightage of continuous temporary service , rendered before the date of their absorption in the service , by granting scale of pay with increments and releasing arrears thereto .
6. The union pleads that the claimants were selected after interview and formalities , as required for selection against permanent vacancy. The claimants requested the bank to absorb them in permanent cadre which request was not conceded to. They were constrained to file writ petition before the Apex Court , being W.P. No.281 / 1986, which was disposed of vide orders dated 8-9-1986, 8-5-1987 and 21-8-1987 . The union projects that in order dated 8-9-1986 the Apex Court commanded the bank that the workmen who had completed 240 days of employment in a year will be retained in service and will also be considered for absorption as and when vacancy arises. However the Court clarified that the order will not prejudice rights of those workmen who were originally in the employment of Lakshmi Commercial Bank and are entitled to benefit of being absorbed in the bank . In order dated 8-5-1987, the Court clarified that the casual workmen who had completed 240 days of employment in a calendar year would have preference for absorption as and when vacancy arises . The first such daily wager will be entitled to be considered for the first vacancy which arises . It was however clarified therein that by the term " workmen being retained in service " the Court meant that thay would be retained in the panel of daily wagers .
9. The bank demurs the claim pleading that it was constrained to engage daily wagers due to exigencies of work, arising out of unpredictable leave by the sub staff, for smooth functioning of its branches. Moving of a writ petition before the Apex Court in 1986 and its disposal vide order dated 8-9-1986 has not been disputed . Clarification ofthat order by the Apex Court vide order dated 8-5-1987 has not been disputed by the bank. There is also no dispute concerning order dated 21-8-1987, on the strength of which Labour Commissioner, Delhi , was called upon to decide the issue, relating to implementation of orders dated 8-9-86 and 8-5-87 , raised by the claimants . The bank concedes that on consideration of detailed information and data relating to surplus sub staff, the Labour Commissioner, Delhi, passed an order dated 7-3-1989 wherein bank was calledupon to make more realistic assessment of workload inrespect of its establishment such as branches , extension and collection counters etc. in Union Territory of Delhi , which assessment was to be made within a period of 4 months . The bank projects that the Labour Commissioner , Delhi , called upon it to make an assessment of workload and vacancy position in a period of 4 months . It has been claimed that the Labour Commissioner had not commanded the bank to make absorption of claimants within a period of 4months .
7. The union asserts that the claimants requested the bank to regularize their services , since they were working continucusly for years together . Despite their request the bank did not implement the orders passed by theApex Court . The matter was again raised before the Apex Court and vide its order dated 21-8-1987 the Court advised the parties to approach the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , for disposal of the matter. In view of the order, the matter was raised before the Labour Commissioner, Delhi . He considered the records , documents and submissions made by the parties before him and passed an order on 9-3-1984 detailing therein that the bank, after making realistic assessment of regular posts in Union Territory of Delhi , would absorb the workmen on permanent basis within 4months of the order. The union asserts that the claimants were entitled to get absorption in regular service latest by 4months from the date ofthe order . According to the union date oftheir absorption can be stipulated as 6 July, 1989. It has beendetailed by the union that finally the claimants have been made permanent ., However, Shri Vijay Singh Chauhan, Shri Surya Chandra , Shri Jai Singh and Shri Surya Kumar were absorbed in March , 1996, after seven years of the order passed by the Labour Commissioner, Delhi.
10. The bank declares that in view of the order dated 7-3-1989 survey was conducted and position of existing strength of sub staff, as in June , 1989 , was 479 persons against requirement of457 employees . Thus , in June , 1989 there were 22 sub staff surplus . This factual position was brought on record and a report filed before the Labour Commissioner, Delhi . The bank made it clear before the Labour Commissioner that the daily wagers , in respect of whom orders were passed by the Apex Court , would be absorbed as sub staff as and when vacancy would arise from time to time .
8. As per paragraph 508 of Shastri Award and paragraph 23.15 of Desai Award there are four categories ofemployees viz . ( 1 ) Permanent Employees (2) Probationers (3) Temporary Employees , and (4) Part Time Employees . Clause 20.7 of first bipartite settlement defines the term "temporary employee " . Wages and leave rules are equally
11.The bank presents that all 21 workmen have been absorbed. The issue of their non - absorption no longer applicable to temporary and permanent employees . The bank kept the claimants on first stage of scale wages for 8 1701 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
commanded that the casual workers shall be considered for absorption in service of the bank as and when vacancy arises . For sake of convenience , the order is extracted below:
" Shri K.N.Bhatt gave an undertaking on behalf of Canara Bank that the petitioners who are casual workmeninthe employment ofCanara Bank and who have completed over 240 days of employment in a year will be retained in service and will also be considered for absorption as and when vacancy arises. This order will not prejudice the right of those workmen who were originally in the employment of the erstwhile Lakshmi commercial bank and have now been absorbed in Canara Bank . The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. "
survives . The Apex Court had prescribed no time bound absorption of the daily wagers in service . It does not lie in the mouth of the union to claim that the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , acting in pursuance of the directions of the Apex Court, could impose any time limit for implementation of orders of the Court . Since the claimants have accepted their absorption , as per directions and conditions stated in the absorption orders , the demand made relating to benefit of the service , rendered as casual employees , is uncalled for. The claimants worked as daily wagers at intermittent periods against leave vacancies . They were never engaged as permanent employees , after completionofformalities . No dispute was in existence when the union approached the Conciliation Officer , since the claimants were absorbed in service of the bank even prior to that date. The bank claims that the claim put forward may be discarded and an award may be passed in its favour.
12. In rejoinder facts pleaded in the claim statement are reiterated.
19. The phrase " casual workmen ... , who have completed over 240 days of employment in a year will be retained in service " , used by the Apex Court in order dated 8-9-1986 created an ambiguity in the mind ofthe parties .A miscellaneous petition No.9289/ 1987 was moved to seek clarification of above order . While disposing of the said petition, the Court clarified that above phrase used in the order meant that the claimants would be retained in the panel ofdaily wagers . For sake of convenience , the order passed by the Apex Court is detailed thus:-
13.Vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007 - IR(C - II) New Delhi dated 11-02-2008 , case was transferred to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.II , New Delhi for adjudication , by the appropriate Government . It was retransferred to this Tribunal for adjudication by the appropriate Government, vide order No.Z - 22019/ 6/2007- IR(C- II ) , New Delhi , dated 30-03-2011 .
14. Vide order dated 26-9-2006 , the bank was proceeded ex -parte .
15. On 20-8-2007 Shri Ashwani Rana and Shri Ramesh Kumar were examined on behalf of the union . The union closed its evidence on that very day.
"We are called upon to clarify or elaborate order dated September 8 , 1986 of this court . It appears plain that the court intended that casual workmen described as daily wagers employed in Canara Bank who had completed 240 days of employment in 12 calendar months would have preference for absprption as and when vacancy arises . The first such daily wager will be entitled to be considered for the first vacancy which arises . We may make it clearthat by the order dated September 8 , 1986 where reference was made to the workmen being retained in service , what was intended was that they would be retained in the panel ofdaily wagers . The Canara Bank will consider such casual workmen for daily wagers for absorption as and when vacancy arises in accordance with the practice followed by them hitherto for. "
16. On 19-7-2009 the bank joined the proceedings . Vide order dated 7-1-2010 the Tribunal commanded that Shri Ramesh Kumar and Ashwani Rana would enter the witness box to face rigors of cross examination . However, the union opted not to produce Shri Ramesh Kumar and Shri Ashwani Rana to undergo ordeal of cross examination. The bank also opted not to examine any witness in its defense, since the case was hinging on orders passed by the Apex Court as well as order dated 7-3-1989 , passed by the Labour Commissioner, Delhi .
17. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri Om Parkash Sharma , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the union . Miss Neha Bhatnagar , authorized representative , presented facts on behalf of the bank . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are follows:
18. As emerged over the record, the Apex Court disposed of writ petition No.281 / 86 vide its order dated 8-9-1986 . In the order under reference , the Court
20.As the order commands , the claimants were to be retained in panel of daily wagers and given preference for absorption in service as and when vacancy arises . The bank was saddled with a responsibility to consider the first daily wager for absorption against the first vacancy when it was to arise . The bank waited for the vacancy to arise , which made the claimants impatient and they again moved amiscellaneous petition No. 17984/1987 before Apex Court. While disposing of that petition, the Apex Court noted that there was a considerable dispute over the question as to whether orders dated 8-9-1986 and 8-5-1987 have been implemented by the bank. The Court found it not possible 1702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
to resolve that question in the proceedings before it. It
directed the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , to dispose ofthe
dispute within a period of 3 months . The order dated
21-8-1987 passed by the Apex Court is reproduced thus:-
"There is a considerable dispute before us on the
questionwhether orders ofthis Court dated 8-9-1986
and 8-5-1987 have been implemented by the
respondent-Canara Bank . It is not possible to resolve
that question in the present proceedings . We leave
it open to the workmen concerned to apply to the
Labour Commissioner, Delhi , for a decision on the
question. It willbe open to the Labour Commissioner ,
Delhi , to take evidence in the matter for the purpose
ofarriving at a decision . We trust it will be possible
for the Labour Commissioner to dispose of the entire
proceedings within 3 months from the date of
application made by the workmen . With these
directionsthe miscellaneous petition is disposed off. "
21. Pursuant to the directions referred above , the
Labour Commissioner , Delhi , heard the parties . He
considered the facts and documents placed before him by
the parties . On consideration of facts , he passed an order
on 7-3-1989 , concluding portion of which order is
reproduced thus:-
" In the light of the above discussion it is clear that
thebank is called upon to make realistic assessment
oftheworkload in respect of its establishments such
as branches , extension and collection counters etc.
in the Union Territory of Delhi and the regular posts
which would arise there to . A time bound exercise of
this nature is required so that bank should be able to
specify the number of regular subordinate staff
required in its establishment in the Union Territory
of Delhi . The bank should thereafter absorb the
petitioner workmen in terms of the undertaking
furnished by the bank to the Supreme Court and in
the light ofthe honorable Supreme Court order dated
8-9-1986 and 8-5-1987 . This should be done within 4
months from the date of this order" .
22. Out of the orders , referred above , it stands
crystallized that the Apex Court commanded the bank to
retain the claimants on panel of daily wagers and consider
them for absorption in service , as and when vacancy arises .
The first daily wager was to be considered for the first
vacancy.However, right of the workmen who were originally
in the employment of erstwhile Lakshmi Commercial Bank,
which merged with the bank , was not to be prejudiced by
the factum ofabsorption of the claimants in the service of
the bank . Therefore , it was apparent that workmen, who
were in the service of erstwhile Lakshmi Commercial Bank,
were to be absorbed first and thereafter the claimants were
to be absorbed as per their seniority. Since the claimants
apprehended that the bank was not taking steps for their
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
absorption , the Labour Commissioner , Delhi , was
commanded by the Apex Court to hear the parties and
decide the dispute . As is evident , no time frame for the
absorption was prescribed by the Apex Court in its orders .
Whenseized of the matter, the Labour Commissioner, Delhi ,
called upon the bank to make a realistic assessment of
work load in its establishments such as branches , extension
and collection counters in the Union Territory of Delhi and
regular posts which would arise thereto. He commanded
thebank to take that exercise within a period offour months.
Consequently it is emerging that the time frame given by
the Labour Commissioner was for making a realistic
assessment of work load and not in relation to absorption
ofthe claimants by the bank .
23. The bank took steps , in pursuance of command
givenby the Labour Commissioner , Delhi , and assessed
thatthere was requirement of 457 sub staff in its branches ,
extension counters and offices located in Union Territory
ofDelhi as on June 29 , 1989 against existing strength of
479 persons . The bank projected before the Labour
Commissioner, Delhi , that on that day 22 sub staff were
surplus . This proposition was never questioned either by
the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , or by the claimants . It is
apparent that the bank was duty bound to absorb those
surplus staff against the vacancies which were to arise.
Such an act on the part of the bank was exempted by the
Apex Court, vide its order dated 8-9-1986 . After absorption
of surplus staff, the first vacancy was to be given to the
first daily wager empanelled in pursuance of order dated
8-5-1987 , second vacancy to the person whose name stood
at serial No.2 in the panel and so on. While granting
vacancies in that manner , the bank absorbed Shri
Rameshwar Dutt on 18-7-1990 , Shri Ramesh Poojari on
18-9-1990 . Shri Rajinder Kumar and Shri Surveer Singh
Negi were absorbed on 9-6-1992 while Shri Ram Avilash
was made permanent on 28-2-1990 . Thereafter Shri Om
Prakash was regularized on 18-7-1993 and Shri Shiv Kumar
was regularized on 7-7-1993. Shri Ramesh Kumar , Shri Karan
Singh, Shri Subhash Chander, Shri Johar Dass , Shri Harish
Chander, Shri Kamal Singh , Shri Dharam Pal , Shri Mohan
Chandra and Shri Dalip Singh were made regular on
14-9-1995 . Services of Shri Vijay Chauhan , Shri Surya
Chandra , Shri Jai Singh and Shri Suman Kumar were
regularized by the bank on 30-3-1996 . There is no dispute
ontheproposition that services of the claimants have been
made regular by the bank . The only question , which has
been raised by the union is that the bank was under an
obligation to regularize their services by 6-7-1989 . Alas ! no
such dead line was given by the Apex Court or the Labour
Commissioner, Delhi , in that regard . In his order the Labour
Commissioner, Delhi , speaks ofthe work assessment , which
was to be made by the bank within the time span of four
months . Consequently it is evident that absorption of
services of the claimants was in consonance with the
directions given by the Apex Court .
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1703
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2, 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
24. The Apex Court directed the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , to resolve the issue regarding implementation of order dated 8-9-1986 and 8-5-1987 . In the aforesaid orders , the bank was burdened with an obligation to regularize services of the claimants , as per their empanelment as and when vacancies were to arise . No directions were given by the Apex Court to create new vacancies for absorption of the claimants . The vacancies were to arise on superannuation or death of employees or on account of opening of new branches in ordinary course ofbusiness . The bank regulariged services of the claimants as and when vacancies arose for them in ordinary course ofbusiness . No fault can be attributed to the action of the bank, in that regard.
25. Question for consideration would be as to whether the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , was competent to give time frame to the bank for absorption of services of the claimants . No such obligation was imposed by the Court on the Labour Commissioner, Delhi . He was to resolve the dispute as to whether there existed vacancies with the bank for absorption of the claimants and if 100 as and when those vacancies were to arise. The Labour Commissioner , Delhi , had not discharged his duties , in the light ofdirections given to him . He left it open for the bank to make an assessment of its work load and existing position ofstrength in sub staff cadre and then apprise him of the situation within a period of four months from the date of his order. When the bank submitted its report , after realistic assessment of work load and requirement of 457 personnel against existing strength of 479 persons , as on 26-6-89 , he failed to ascertain as to whether the exercise done by the bank was in consonance with the factual situation prevailing at that time . It was his duty to ascertain as to how many workmen of Lakshmi Commercial Bank were surplus and how many persons in sub staff cadre were to retire . Without taking this exercise he was not in a position to resolve the dispute raised by the claimants , relating to their non - absorption by the bank pursuant to the directions givenby the Apex Court . Had the Labour Commissioner, Delhi , been vigilant in discharge of his duties , there would have been no occasion for the union to agitate the dispute relating to delay in regularization of their services before the appropriate Government . These facts make it apparent that lapse on the part of Labour Commissioner, Delhi , lead the claimants to be wilder on their rights and to approach the union for redressal of their grievances .
26. As detailed above , services of the claimant were absorbed as and vacancies arose for them . In view of these facts and circumstances , it is apparent that the union speak beyond the scope of reference when it talked that the claimants are entitled for weightage of services rendered by them as daily wagers , besides grant of increments and other consequential benefits to them . The Apex Court never talked ofweightage of services rendered by them as casual labours towards increments and other benefits . Even in
651GI /13-21
the dispute referred to the Tribunal for adjudication, the appropriate Government had not raised any question relating to weightage and other benefits of service rendered bythe claimants as daily wagers . The claim in that regard is unfounded.
27. Above reasons constrain me to conclude that there was no issue available to the union to raise a dispute relating todelayin regularization of services of the claimants by the bank, when no vacancy arose for them prior to 1992 . As and when vacancies arose, their services were regularized , as per seniority in panel prepared on directions oftheApex Court , given in order dated 8.5.1987. The claim put forward is devoid of merits . The same is , accordingly, brushed aside . An award is passed in favour of the bank and against the union and claimants . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 527. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इण्डियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-1-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/ 113/2005- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]
शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 5th February, 2013
S.O. 527. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court - 2 , Dhanbad, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-1-2013 .
[No. L- 12012/ 113/2005- IR (B- II) ] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri KISHORI RAM, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)(d) ofthe I.D. Act , 1947 Reference No. 11 of 2006 [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
PARTIES: Employer in relation to the management of Indian Bank, Ranchi and their workmen.
APPEARANCES :
None
Onbehalf of the workman :
एल एम - एन डब्ल्यू के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या CGIT- 2/ 14 ऑफ 2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल -11012/9/2009- आई आर ( सीएम- I ) ] Onbehalf of the Management : Mr. O.P. Verma , Ld . Advocate .
State : Jharkhand
एम. के. सिंह , अनुभाग अधिकारी Industry: Banking
Dated, Dhanbad, the 26th December, 2012
New Delhi , the 5th February, 2013
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(-1 )(d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L- 12012/ 113/2005 - IR (B- 2) dated23-2-2006.
SCHEDULE
S.O. 528. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/ 14 of2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal 2, Mumbai , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s . Air France- KLM - NW. and their workman , received by the Central Government on 5-2-2013 .
[No. L- 11012/9/2009 - IR (CM - I) ] M. K. SINGH , Section Officer
ANNEXURE
"Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Main Road, Ranchi in not allowing Md . Jahangir Alam , Ex - Tiny Deposit Collector to collect deposits amounts to termination? If yes , whether the terminationfrom service is justified and to what reliefhe is entitled ? "
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
Present : K.B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT- 2 / 14 of 2009
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OFAIR FRANCE- KLM NW
(i) The General Manager (Operations ) AirFrance- KLM - NW 2 C , Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Sahar Mumbai -400 099.
2.Workman Md. Jahangir Alam , and Mr. O.P. Verma, the Ld . Advocate for the management are present . A compromise Settlement in double copies duly signed by the workman and under the signature of the authority concerned for the Chief Manager of the Bank filed and pressedby the both the parties . On interrogation as to the terms and conditions of the Compromise settlement, the workman has stated to have settled it on the payment ofall the security deposits to him , and out of which , he has received fifty percent of it on its payment by the management and the rest security deposits lying with the Indian Bank concerning the workman will be released as assured by the Bank .
(ii) The General Manager AirFrance- KLM - NW 8C, DLF Cybercity Gurgaon. AND
THEIRWORKMEN
TheGeneral Secretary
Aviation Industry Employees Guild , OldAirport Santacruz, Mumbai 400 029 .
Perused the case record. The present reference relates to an issue about the action of the management of Indian Bank, Main Road , Ranchi , in not allowing Md. Jahangir Alam , Ex- Tiny Deposit Collector to collect deposits amounts to termination. In view of the aforesaid voluntary settlement ofthe issue by the both the parties as perthe Compromise Settlement, the Industrial Dispute no longer exists . Hence the case is closed and accordingly an Awardof Settlement based on the compromise settlement forming a part of it, is passed.
APPEARANCES :
KISHORI RAM , Presiding Officer
Mr. Sunil Shroff, Advocate .
Forthe Employer :
नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2013
For the Workmen : No appearance.
Mumbai , dated the 7th December, 2012 .
का.आ. 528.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयर फ्रांस-के 1705
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment by its Order No. L- 11012/09/2009 - IR(CM- I ) , dated 20-2-2009 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
" ( i ) Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Air France -KLM -NW in separating the services of 34 workmen (as perAnnexure) w.e.f 1-1-2009 is justified and legal ? ( ii) To what reliefs are the workmen concerned entitled and from which date? "
Name
Sr.
(2)
(1)
1. Farah Daruwalla
2.Rajarshi Chandran
3. Sabitha Naik
4. Gerard Mendes
5.Rupali Samant
6.KyronGomes
7. Sharleen Rosario
8. Poonam Yadav (Deleted vide Ex-23 )
9. Erica Horner
10. Payal Karnan
11. MarciaGonsalves
12. Eugene Pereira
13. Sanjay Patil
14. Joseph Barbosa
15. Rajkumar Faiswal
16. Ashok Chhikara
17. Om prakash Ruhil
18. Amit Rawat
19. Sriniwas Ramudu
20. Sobroto Barua
21. Jasmeet Kaur Arneda
22. Pallavi Srivastava
23. Vimal Jeet Singh
24. Rameshwar D. Falswal
25. Jeet Singh
26.Hari Thapa
(1) (2)
27. S.B. Thapa
28. Mohan Dutt
29. Kishan Kumar
30. Rohtas Kumar
31.Balkishan
32. R.S. Rana
33. Shivcharan Kashyap
34. Rajit Pankaj
(2)After receipt of the reference , notices were sent to both the parties . In response to the notice, second party union filed statement of claim Ex - 7 Union also filed application Ex-8 for interim relief praying to grant last drawn wages / subsistence allowance to the 9 workmen listed in para 10 ofthe statement of claim . First party management resisted the statement ofclaim of the second party by filing written statement at Ex- 10. They denied the submissions made by the second party in their statement of claim and prayed to dispose of the reference . Second party filed rejoinder at Ex - 12 . Thereafter advocate for the second party filed application Ex- 23 for deleting name ofMs. Poonam Yadav from the list of workmen as she does not want to proceed with the matter. Orders were passed on Ex - 23 :.Meanwhile firstparty filed joint memos at Ex-26 to 38 stating that some ofthe workmen have settled their claims with first party and prayed to dispose the reference . The matter was adjourned on several occasions for say of the second party onthese applications /joint memos . First party again filed an application at Ex-39 praying to dispose of the reference as concerned workmen or their legal representatives are not appearing in the matter and no say is filed on their behalf. From the record it is revealed that second party union is not appearing in this reference since March 2011 except on 9-12-2011 when one of the workmen Ms. Rupali Samant was present. Thereafter they have failed to appear before this Tribunal . Furthermore most of the workmen seem to have settled their disputes with first party. In the circumstances , I think it proper to dispose of the reference for want of prosecution . Thus I pass the following order:
ORDER
Reference is disposed of for want of prosecution with no order as to cost.
Date: 7-12-2012
Κ. Β . ΚAΤAKE , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 529. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एटलांटा [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013/PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1706
इनफ्रास्क्ट्रचर लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/2012 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/ 169/ 2011- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ]
बी.एम. पटनायक , अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 5th February, 2013
S.O. 529.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 8/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s .Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 5-2-2013 .
[No. L- 22012/ 169/ 2011 - IR (CM - II ) ] Β . Μ . PATNAIK, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present:
SHRI J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer C.GI.T. - cum- Labour Court , Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE No. 8/2012
Date of Passing Order - 29th October, 2012
L-22012/169/2011 - IR ( CM - II ) , dated 6-1-2012
Between:
M/s . Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. , 101, Shree Ambasanti Chambers , Opp.: Hotel Leela, Andheri Kurla Road , Andheri East , Mumbari - 400 059
1stParty-Management .
And
Their Workman Shri Kumar Debasish , At . FL - 275 , Basanti Colony,
Ps . Udit Nagar , Sundargarh.s
2nd Party -Workman
Appearances:
None.
Forthe 1st Party- Management .
None .
For the 2nd Party- Workman.
ORDER
Case taken up today. None of the parties is present .
2.The 2nd Party- workman has to file the statement of claim today, but no statement of claim has been filed. Three notices , two by ordinary post on 22-2-2012 and 7-5-2012 and one by registered post on 27-9-2012 were sent to the 2nd Party-workman calling upon him to file the statement of claim by the date so fixed in the notice . But the 2nd Party-workman has failed to file any statement of claim . He also did not appear before the Tribunal on any date and took no steps to proceed with the case. Without any statement of claim the case cannot be further proceeded with. The reference was received in this Tribunal on 24-1-2012 and since then the case has been lingering for nothing. As such it appears to at the 2nd Party - workman is not interested in prosecuting his case . Either he has settled hisdispute amicably with the Management out of court or he has no dispute to proceed with any further. Hence it will not serve any fruitful purpose to keep the case pending for long . Under these circumstances it is assumed that there remains no dispute to be adjudicated upon. Hence no dispute award is to be passed in the case . Accordingly no dispute award is passed .
3. The reference is answered accordingly.
JITENDRA SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 5 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 530.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947
का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण/ श्रम न्यायालय , आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 36/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-22012/ 554/1995- आई आर ( सी- II ) ]
बी. एम. पटनायक, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 5th February, 2013
S.O. 530 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 36/1996) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman . which was received by the Central Government on 5-2-2013.
[No. 1. - 22012/554 / 1995 - IR ( C - II) ] Β . Μ . PATNAIK, Section Officer 1707 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
ORDER
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL
Let an " Award " be and the same is passed as " No Dispute" existing . Send the copies of the order to the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and need- ful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.
'PRESENT: SRI JAYANTAKUMARYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer
JAYANTA KUMAR SEN, Presiding Officer REFERENCE No. 36 OF 1996
नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2013
PARTIES : The management of Nutandanga Colly, M/ s . ECL , Burdwan
Vs.
The Secy. CMU, Burdwan ( WB)
REPRESENTATIVES :
None
For the management:
For the union ( Workman) : None
का.आ. 531.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बडोदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 139/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
INDUSTRY: COAL
STATE : WEST BENGAL
Dated- 15-01-13
AWARD
[सं. एल -12011/ 139/2006- आई आर ( बी- II) ] शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 6th February, 2013
In exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) Govt . of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L. - 22012/ 554/ 95 - IR ( C - II ) dated 21-08-96 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
S.O. 531. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 139/ 2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court- I , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 5-2-2013.
[No. L - 12011 / 139/2006 - IR (B - II) ]
SHEESH RAM , Section Officer "Whether the action of the management of Nutandanga Colliery under Padaveshwar Area of M/ s . ECL is justified in denying the protection of wages in fixation of pay to S/Sh . Prafulla Gouda, Karu Das , Birj Jaswara No. 2 on conversion from piece rated toTime rate w.e.f 1987. If not , what relief . the workmen are entitled ? "
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K.YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX,
DELHI
I.D. No. 139/2011
The General Secretary,
Abu Lane , Meerut Cantt . ,
Having received the Order of Letter No. L- 22012/ 554/95 - I.R. (C - II) dated 21-8-96 of the above said reference from the Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 36 of 1996 was registered and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevanl documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.
.... Workınan
Bank ofBaroda Employees ' Union C/o Bank ofBaroda, 188 , Meerut (U.P. ) - 250001 .
Versus
The Assistant General Manager ,
Bank ofBaroda , Regional Office , 1 , Sanklan Road , Bhotia Padav , Nainital Road , Haldwani .
...Management Onperusal ofthe case record, it has been found that the workman is neither appearing nor taking any step since 2007. It seems that the workman has now no more interest to proceed with the case any further. Hence , the case is closed and accordingly an order of " No Dispute Award" is hereby passed.
1708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013/ PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) )
AWARD
employees . Any appointment dehors the statutory rules is illegal ab initio and does not confer any right on the person. It has been projected that the claimant was engaged by the bank on adhoc basis for odd jobs as daily wager in case of exigencies . It is disputed that he was engaged as a peon with effect from 02-07-1998 . The bank further disputes that he worked in that capacity continuously. He was engaged at intervals . When there was no job, which warranted his engagement , his services were not taken thereafter. It has been projected that the claimant had not rendered any continuous service hence the bank was not under any obligation to follow provisions ofSection 25 - F, 25- G and 25- H of the Act , besides rules 76 and 77. of the Rules . His claim is liable to be dismissed, being misconceived, pleads the bank .
Bank of Baroda ( in short the bank ) engaged Shri Maroj Kumar at its Rail Road, Saharanpur branch as daily wager in exigencies . As and when there were odd jobs with the bank , services of the claimant were obtained. He was paid for the days he was so engaged. He was not engaged after 15-10-2003 . Shri Manoj Kumar raised a demand on the bank for reinstatement in service . His demand was not conceded to . Ultimately, he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since the bank contested his claim , conciliation proceedings ended into failure . On consideration of failure report , submitted by the Conciliation Officer , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2 , New Delhi , for adjudication, vide Order No. L- 12011 / 139 /2006- IR( B - II ) , New Delhi dated 30-08-2007, with following terms:
4. Vide order No. Z - 22019/ 6/ 2007 - IR( C- II ), New Delhi dated 30-03-2011 , case was transferred to this Tribunal for adjudication by the appropriate Government .
5. Claimant entered the witness box to substantiate his claim . Shri Anup Kumar Chauhan was also examined by him . Shri Surender Kumar Ahuja unfolded facts on behalf of the bank . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .
"Whether Shri Manoj Kumar was employed in Bank ofBaroda, Railway Road branch , Saharanpur with effect from 02-07-1998 to 15-10-2003 regularly and continuously? If so , the action of the management ofBank of Baroda in terminating/disengaging him from the service with effect from 16-10-2003 without notice pay and compensation under the provision ofIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "
6. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri B.K. Prasad, authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf ofthe claimant. Shri R. R. Kumar , authorised representative , presented facts on behalf of the bank . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the records . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :
7. In affidavit Ex . WW1 / A , tendered as evidence , claimant swears that he was employed as peon by the bank on 02-07-1998 as daily wager . He rendered continuous service of 240 days in each calendar year. His services were terminated by the bank on 16-10-2003 without assigning any reason . No notice was served on him by the bank in that regard . Alongwith his affidavit , he had relied on documents Ex . WW1 / 1 to Ex . WW1 / 17 to establish that he rendered continuous service with the bank .
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Manoj Kumar pleading therein that he was employed at Railway Road , Saharanpur branch of the bank as peon with effect from 02-07-1998 . He rendered continuous service for more than 240 days in every calendar year . The bank used to pay conveyance allowance to him for outdoor duties . However , he was not allowed to mark his attendance . He was called a casual employee . His wages were not paid in accordance with the scale of pay meant for peon . Despite all these odds , his services were illegally terminated on 16-10-2003 . Termination of his services is illegal , since it is violative of provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( in short the Act) . The bank had also violated provisions of Rule 76 and 77 of the Industrial Disputes (Central ) Rules , 1957 ( in short the Rules ) , since no seniority list was prepared . His engagement as daily wager amounts to unfair labour practice . The bank violated provisions of Shastri Award , when he was engaged as daily wager for continuous long period. He claims that he is unemployed since the date of termination of his services . He seeks his reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .
8. Shri Anup Chauhan deposed that the claimant was working as a casual employee in Railway Road , Saharanpur branch of the bank. He started working there inthat capacity in July 1998. His services were dispensed with on 16-10-2003 . He unfolds that he was organizing secretary of the union , of which the claimant was not a member. He concedes that he was never posted in Personnel Department of the bank . He also concedes that he had no right to intervene in decision of the bank relating as to whom and for what period it may engage as casual employee .
3. Demurral was made by the bank that it is State within the ambit ofArticle 12 of Constitution of India . As such , it is under an obligation to comply with statutory rules and regulations in the matter of appointment of
9. Inhis affidavit Ex.MW1 /A , tendered as evidence , [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1709
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
Shri Surender Kumar Ahuja swears that the claimant was engaged from time to time as daily wager. His engagement usedtobe discontinued on the same day, after paying him wages prescribed under the law. He was never engaged continuously for a period of 240 days in any calendar year. Claimant had full knowledge that he was engaged only in case ofpressing necessity, as and when permanent staff happened to be on leave . During course of his cross examination , he presents that records relating to his casual employment upto 31-12-2001 stood weeded out . For the months ofFebruary ' 02 , April ' 02 , August ' 02 , October ' 02 and February' 03 , claimant was not at all engaged by the bank.
10. When facts unfolded by the claimant , Shri Chauhan and Shri Ahuja are appreciated, it came to light that except self serving words , no other evidence has been brought over the record to substantiate that the claimant rendered continuous service with the bank. Question for consideration would be as to whether facts unfolded by the claimant and Shri Chauhan would enable the claimant to establish his continuous service with the bank? Therefore it would be expedient to know as to what the term " continuous service" means . " Continuous Service" has been defined by Section 25 -B of the Act. Under sub -section ( 1 ) of the said section, " continuous service for a period " may comprise of two period viz . ( i ) uninterrupted service , and ( ii ) interrupted service on account of (a) sickness , (b ) authorized leave , ( c) an accident, (d) a strike which is not legal , (e) a lock- out , and (f) a cessation of work that is not due to any fault on the part ofthe workman , shall be included in the " continuous service" . Sub - section (2) of the said section introduces a fiction to the effect that even if a workman is not in "continuous service" within the meaning of clause ( 1 ) for a period of one year or six months , he shall be deemed to in continuous service for that period under an employer if he has actually worked for the days specified in clauses (a) and (b ) thereof. In Vijay Kumar Majoo ( 1968 Lab.I.C.1180 ) it was held that one year's period contemplated by sub - section ( 2 ) furnished a unit of measure and if during that unit of measure the period of service actually rendered by the workman is 240 days , then he can be considered to have rendered one year's continuous service for the purpose of the section . The idea is that if within a unit period of one year a person had put in at least 240 days of service , then he must get the benefit conferred by the Act. Consequently , an enquiry has to be made to find out whether the workman actually worked for not less than 240 days during the period of 12 calendar months immediately preceding the retrenchment .
11. In Ramakrishna
Ramnath [ 1970 (2 ) LLJ 306 ] , the Apex Court announced that when a workman renders continuous service of not less than 240 days in 12 calendar months , he is deemed to have completed one years ' service in the industry. It would be expedient to reproduce observations made by the Apex Court in that regard , which are extracted thus :
"Under Section 25 - B a workman who during the period of 12 calendar months has actually worked in an industry for not less than 240 days is to be deemed to have completed one year's service in the industry. Consequently an enquiry has to be made to find out whether the workman had actually worked for not less than, 240 days during period of 12 calendar months immediately preceding the retrenchment . These provisions of law do not show that a workman after satisfying the test under Section 25B has further to show that he has worked during all the period he has been in the service of the employer for 240 days in the year" .
12. When the workman concerned fails to establish that he worked for atleast 240 days in the year, he cannot claim protection against termination ofhis services in order to seek regularization of his services on monthly salary with benefits like pension , gratuity etc. Interruption of service occurred during the course of job has to be included in uninterrupted services . Fiction under section 25-B oftheAct will operate if workmen has actually worked for 240 days in a calendar year. The explanation appended to section 25 -B of the Act specifically includes the days onwhich workman was laid off under an agreement or he has been on leave with full wages , or he has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out ofand in the course of his employment and in the case ofa female , maternity leave , under the expression ' actually worked ' used under sub - section 2 of section 25 - B of the Act.
13. Whether the words ' actually worked ' would not include holidays , Sundays and Saturdays for which full wages are paid? The Apex Court was confronted with such a proposition in American Express Banking Corporation [1985 (2) LLJ 539] . It was ruled therein that the expression 'actually worked under the employer ' cannot mean those days only when the workman worked with hammer, sickle or pen, but must necessarily comprehend all those days during which he was in the employment of the employer and for which he had been paid wages either under express or implied contract of service or by compulsion of statute , standing orders etc. Court ruled that Sundays and other holidays , would be comprehended in the words ' actual work' and its countenanced the contention of the employer that only days which are mentioned in the explanation shouldbe taken into account for the purpose of calculating the number of days on which the workmen had actually worked though he had not so worked and no other days . The court observed that the explanation is only clarificatory, as all explanations are , and cannot be used to limit the expanse of the main provision . Precedent in Lalappa Lingappa [ 1981 ( 1 ) LJ 308 ] was distinguished by theApex Court in the case referred above . The precedent was followed in Standard Motor Products of India Ltd. [1986 ( 1 ) LLJ 34] . Thus , it is crystal clear from the law laid above that Sundays and holidays shall be included in [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
1710
evidence , direct or circumstantial , there remains a vacuum of evidence to conclude facts in his favour.
computing continuous service under section 25 - B of the Act.
14. Now I would turn to factual matrix of the controversy. As detailed above , the claimant unfolds in his affidavit Ex. WW1 /A that he continuously served the bank since 2-7-1998 till 16-10-2003 . Shri Chauhan also deposed in the same vein . Whether affidavit of the claimant or oculer facts unfolded by Shri Chauhan are enough to establish continuous service with the bank ? Answer lies in negative . In Rajasthan State Gauganagar Mills Ltd. [2004 (103) FLR 192 ] the Apex Court ruled that mere filing of affidavit or giving one's own statement is not enough to prove factum that the claimant worked with the management for240 days . Inthe Range Forest Officer (2002 LLR 339) it was also ruled that to prove that he infact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination, the claimant had to lead evidence and mere filing of affidavit in that regard would not suffice . Proofof receipt of salary , record of appointment or termination of service etc. are to be provedby cogent evidence . In view of these reasons , it is concluded that ocular facts unfolded by the claimant and Shri Chauhan will not enable the claimant to discharge onus resting on him.
17. As detailed above , the claimant had not been able to establish that he rendered continuous service of 240 days in preceding 12 months from the date of alleged termination of his services . He could not establish that he was engaged regularly and continuously with effect from 2-7-1998 to 15-10-2003 . As such , claimant has not been able to acquire status of an industrial employee , to seek benefit under the provisions of the Act . Section 25 - F of the Act makes it apparent that in order to seek benefit under the said provision , an employee should render atleast 240 days continuous service in a calendar year . As the claimant had not rendered continuous service of 240 days with the bank in any of the calendar year , provisions of section 25 - Fdo not come into operation . He had not adduced any evidence to this effect that any employee junior to him was working , when his services were dispensed with . In such a situation , provisions of section 25-G ofthe Act also does not come into play. No evidence worth name has been brought to the effect that the bank ever engaged someone else in the job , after termination of his service . As such , provisions of section 25 H of the Act also do not apply. In view of reasons detailed above , it is evident that the claimant is not entitled to any relief. Action ofthe bank in not engaging services of the claimant any further is legal and justified . Claim put forward is liable to be dismissed. Hence his claim is brushed aside . An award is passed in favour of the bank and against the claimant . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dr. R.K. YADAV , Presiding Officer
Dated: 30-1-2013
नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2013
15. To substantiate his claim , the claimant had relied documents Ex . WW1 / 1 to Ex.WW1 /73 . When these documents are closely perused , it came to light that he had filed many documents in duplicate . In all , he had filed only 57 documents to project that he rendered continuous service with the bank . On careful scrutiny of these documents , it came to light that from 16-09-1999 to 08-08-1998, claimant had rendered service for 14 days only. From 03-01-2000 to 07-11-2001 , the claimant had rendered only 14 days of service with the bank. He had rendered service of21 days only from 31-12-2002 till 21-01-2001 . In January 2003, he had rendered only 8 days service .Above facts go to establish that the bank engaged the claimant at intervals in case of exigencies . Facts unfolded by Shri Ahuja get strength out of result of scrutiny of above documents . Therefore , it is crystal clear that the claimant could not establish that he rendered continuous service with the bank for 240 days in any of the calendar years .
का.आ. 532. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार चेन्नई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 94/2012 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -33011 /08 /2012- आई आर ( बी- II ) | शीश राम , अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delh . , The 6th February, 2013
S.O. 532. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 94/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Chennai Port Trust and their workman , 16. As is evident , the claimant used to obtain photocopies of documents as and when he was engaged by the bank in exigencies . He had not called upon the bank to produce records relating to his engagement . At no point of time, such a request was made by the claimant. When Shri Surender Kumar was under cross examination , atthat time too, no such demand was raised by the claimant calling upon the bank to produce records . Therefore , it is obvious that at no point of time, claimant asked the bank to produce records relating to his engagement . It is not a case where an adverse inference can be drawn against the bank, for non -production of record , relating to his engagement , at intervals . When self serving words unfolded by the claimant and ocular facts detailed by Shri Chauhan are discarded for want of corroborative [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1711
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
which was received by the Central Government on 5-2-2013 .
in accordance with the Shankaran award is just , legal and fair?
[No. L- 33011 /08/ 2012 - IR (B - II) ]
(ii) To what relief the workmen are entitled?
SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
4. No evidence has been adduced by the petitioner who is at default to appear .
Points ( i ) and (ii)
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
CHENNAI
Wednesday, the 31st January, 2013
Present : A.N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 94/2012
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , between theManagement of Chennai Port Trust and their Workman] .
Between:
Petitioner/ 1st Party
The General Secretary :
The Transport and Dock
Workers Union Chennai -600001
Vs.
5. Though the petitioner was served with notice , it did not appear in spite of four adjournments given for the purpose . Respondent entered appearance engaging a counsel . Needless to say no evidence has been adduced on behalf of the petitioner to substantiate the referred claim that denial of promotion to 308 senior assistants to the post of assistant superintendents by the management of Chennai Port trust is not just , legal and fair. When the petitioner wishes the court to believe that denial of promotion is notjust, legal and fair, it is for the union , the petitioner ( I Party) to discharge the said burden . By defaulting to appear and contest the dispute by adducing evidence, petitioner has not succeeded in proving its claim. The ID is therefore dismissed for default holding that denial ofpromotion to 308 senior assistants to the post of assistant superintendents in accordance with the Shankaran award is only just, legal and fair and that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.
: Respondent/ 2nd Party
5. The reference is answered accordingly.
The Chairman Chennai Port Trust Chennai - 600001
Appearance:
For the 1st Party/ Petitioner :None
(Dictated to the PA, transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 31st January, 2013) .
For the 2nd Party/Management : Advocate Sh . S.P. Patel
A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer
AWARD
Witnesses Examined :
None
Forthe 1st Party/Petitioner :
None
Forthe 2nd Party/Management :
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 33011 /8 /2012 - IR (B - II) dated 22-11-2012 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribuhal foradjudication.
Documents marked
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
Onthe side of the Petitioner
Ex .No.
Date
Description
Nil
On the side of the Management
"Whether the action of the management of Chennai Port Trust, Chennai in denying promotions to 308 Sr. Assistants to the post of Asstt. Superintendents inaccordance with the Shankaran Award is just, legal and fair? To what relief the workmen are entitled to ?"
Ex.No.
Date
Description
Nil
नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2013
2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 94/2012 and issued notices to both sides . Though Petitioner was served with notice and the ID was adjourned four times , he did not enter appearance . Respondent entered appearance . Needless to say, no claim statement has been filed .
3. Points for consideration are :
का.आ. 533. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स मार्यन फॉरवार्डिंग कारपोरेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय (i) Whether denial of promotion to 308 senior assistants to the post of assistant superintendents
651 GI/13-22 1712
THE GA ETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय-2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी 2/74 ऑफ 2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-31012/ 04/2004- आईआर ( बी- II) ]
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
शीश राम, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 6th February, 2013
S.O. 533. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/ 74 of2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court - 2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the managenter of Maryn Forwarding Corporation and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 5-2-2013 .
[No. L. - 31012/04/2004- IR (B - II] SHEESH RAM, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAI
Present: K.B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2 / 74 of 2005
Employers in relation to the Management of M/ s . Maryn Forwarding Corporation
M/s . Maryn Forwarding Corporation C/o. Shri Sanjay P. Dhulapkar 104 , 1st Floor , Bobby Aots 143 , L.J. Road Mahim (W) Mumbai -40006
AND
TheirWorkmar, Shri Ramdhan Undhe Kalpataru II/2 Poona Link Road Nr. Nutan Dnyanmandir School Kalyan(E) Distt. Thane
For the Englov
"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Maryn Forwarding Corporation , Mumbai in terminating the services of Shri Ramdhan Ananda Unde w.e.f. 01-07-2004 is justified? If not , what relief Shri Ramdhan Ananda Unde is entitled to?"
2. After receipt of the reference both the parties were served with notices. In response to the notice the second party workman filed his statement of claim at Ex- 5 . According to him he was employee of the first party. Initially he was employed in the year 1980by the sister concern ofthe first party. They were required to work hard for 22 hours a day. In 1982 the workman was made permanent. In the year 1983 Markand Patel had conducted a meeting of the workman and declared that he had taken a decision to close the unit and he sought consent of the workmanto close the establishment . All the workmen joined Maharashtra General Kamgar Union/ Association of Engineering Workers led by Dr. Datta Samant. The union strongly opposed the closure of the establishment from backdoor method and also bent upon for 8 hours shift . In 1982 the first party restarted 22 hours day shift and large number of workmen left the company due to harassment and torture by the management . The employer also retrenched 51 workmen in 2003. The said action was arbitrary and without following due process of law . Again in July 2004 the company decided to retrench 56 employees and effected their termination . Union opposed the said termination as it was illegal without due process of law. The employer did not allow 33 employees to resume their duties and they were kept out of employment forcibly including the workman . They approached the management to follow the due process of law . The management then suspended the work and all the workmen were kept out of employment. There were series of meetings resulted in agreement between parties on 11-8-2004 . It was agreed that , the management would follow seniority of employees strictly in case of retrenchment and to allow the remaining employees to resume their duties from 13-8-2004. The workman being the senior most went to resume duty on
Mr. S.P. Dhulapkar , Advocate
APPEARANCES For the Workman : Mr. T.R. Shirke , Representative
Mumbai , the 30th November , 2012
AWARD
The Government of India Ministry of Labour & Employmentby its Order No. L- 31012/4 /2004- IR( B - II ) , dated 27-05-2005 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the 13-8-2004 . But he was not allowed to resume his duty and he was told that he would not be taken on job . The second party workman pointed out through union to the first party that, retrenchment of senior most by retaining juniors is totally illegal and improper. They pointed out that action of the management was arbitrary. However the first party did not consider the request of the second party and illegally terminated services of the second party. Therefore second party has raised industrial dispute . As conciliation failed, as per report of ALC , the Labour Ministry has sent the reference to this Tribunal . The workman prays that , his termination be declared illegal , improper and bad in law and he be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages .
[ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1713 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013/फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
1. Issecond party ' workman' ? Yes.
2. Is action of first party just and proper? No.
As per order below .
3. What relief second party isentitled?
4. Whatorder?
Asper order below.
REASONS
Issue No.1 :-
5. In this respect , it is the case of the first party management that , the second party was working as a Supervisor. He was doing supervisory and managerial duties. Therefore he was not ' workman ' . In support ofhis argument the Ld .Adv. for the first party resorted to Bombay High Court ruling in the case of Union Carbide ( India) Ltd. V/ s . D. Samuel and Ors . 1998 II CLR 736 wherein by considering the duty and nature of work , pay scale etc. , the Hon'ble Court in that case held that :
"Afterconsidering exhaustively the case law on the point and documentary evidence on record , it is held that the respondent falls within the definition of supervisor."
6. In that case the petitioner was delegated duties ofrecommending leave , calling for requisition from stores and evaluating the work of employees below him . At the time ofpromotion he was informed that he was part ofthe management and was liable to be transferred anywhere in the country. He accepted the same . He participated in various programmes organised by the company for its managerial personnel . He was designated as Supervisor . Inthe light ofall these evidence , the Hon'ble Court in that case held that the respondent therein was not ' workman' within the meaning of Section 2 ( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. In this respect the Ld . Adv. also resorted to Delhi High Court ruling reported in Young Women's ChristianAssociation of India V/s . Smt . Jyotsana Paul 2005 LLR 68 ( DEL HC) . In that case the respondent therein was doing supervisory work . Her recurring responsibilities included ensuring high standard of discipline amongst staff, sanctioning of leave and controlling absenteeism . In the circumstances , Hon'ble Court declared that , respondent was not ' workman' within the meaning of Section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act .
3. The first party resisted the statement of claim vide its written statement at Ex- 19. According to them the second party was working with the first party as a Supervisor. He was performing the work of supervisory nature . He was not a workman . Therefore the reference is not tenable. According to them M/ s . Maryn Forwarding Corporation and M/ s . Mac Transport Co. are two independent establishments having separate Board of Directors . They are not sister concerns as has been alleged . For all purposes they are totally independent . The first party is unaware that, the second party was employed in 1980 by M/ s . Mac Transport Co. and he was made permanent . They also denied about the meeting conducted by Makranth Patel in 1983. In 1983 first party has taken over M/ s . Lift and Swift and absorbed their 185 workers . In 1996-97 the company started experiencing downward trend in the business volume . The situation was aggravated further on account ofshifting of some of the work of Bombay Port to Nhava Sheva Port . On account of reduction of work there was substantial fall in the business of the company. Due to poor financial condition they could not offer VRS Scheme or statutory retrenchment compensation to the workers . Company was completely sick and unhealthy in terms of finance . The company had discussions with the union representatives ofMbPT and settlement was arrived at .As per the settlement the permanent workers on muster roll were listed category wise to decide surplus workers and to decide about the workers to be retained . It was agreed that seniority list reflecting the date ofjoining and also date of birth of all the employees were listed. List was prepared and finalised by the union itself. The union also gave list of workers and supervisors whose services were to be terminated as they are rendered surplus . The union has also given list of employees to be retained on the basis of seniority reckoning and also the age and service in the current category. The lists were displayed on the notice board of the company. None of the employees whose names were on the list raised objection for being included in the respective lists . The lists were prepared as per the negotiations and agreement with the union. The second party was member of the union and the settlement is binding on the second party. The claim of the second party is false and his allegations are also false that his services were terminated illegally. According to them the allegation of retrenchment was false as Section 2 (oo) and Section 25 F as no application in the present case as second party is not a ' workman ' . The company terminated the services of the second party legally . They have satisfied the conditions prescribed thereunder. Thus they pray that the reference be dismissed with cost .
4. Following are the issues for my determination. I record my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
Sr. Issues
Findings
7. In this respect I would like to point out that nomenclature or designation of the employee is not important to find out whether he is a workman or not. On the other hand nature of work he is performing is important factor in determining whether the employee is workman or not. Ratio to that effect is laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court inS.K. Maini V/ s . M/ s . Carona Sahu Co. Ltd. AIR 1994 SC 1824 wherein the Hon'ble Court held that , there is distinction in what an employee is engaged to do and No.
1714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 2 , 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
what he does . In the case at hand the second party has contended in his affidavit at Ex - 26 that , he was employed in the year 1980. He was required to report for duty at 8.00 a.m. in the morning . He was allotted work by either loaded container booking in - charge or empty container booking in- charge . One Mr. Prakash was incharge of loaded container whereas Mr. Poojary was incharge of empty container. He used to get list of containers in advance . He used to tally sheets and challan book. He was required to go to the destiny/ points as per the directions above incharge to discharge his duty. After verifying container the same used to be loaded on the trucks of the company. He used to check the seal of the containers and number of containers . All these details were filled up in the log sheet and given to the driver. He was required to prepare tally sheets and fill up all information as provided in the tally sheets . Entire work that he was required to discharge was purely of clerical nature . These averments in his affidavit Ex - 26 are not challenged or denied . Therefore the mere designation as Supervisor is not sufficient to show that the second party was not workman. From the contents in his affidavit , it is revealed that he was doing the work of clerical nature and not as a managerial or supervisory. In the light of above observation of Apex Court and the evidence on record, I hold that though designation ofthe second party was shown as supervisor, he was doing work of clerical nature . Therefore, I hold that the second party was a workman within the meaning of Sec . 2 (s ) of I.D. Act. Thus I decide the issue no.1 in the affirmative.
Issue Nos . 2 & 3 :-
8. In this respect according to the second party workman, he is one of the senior most workmen. Therefore while effecting retrenchment the juniors ought to have retrenched first . According to him, he being senior most ought to have retrenched last as per rule ' first come last go' . On the point the first party has not disputed that the second party workman joined the service in September 1980. They have also not disputed the fact that the workman was one of the senior most employees of the company. In the circumstances as per the settled rule ' first come last go,' retrenchment was required to be effected and the juniors ought to have retrenched first . In this respect it was submitted on behalf of the first party that the list of employees to be retrenched was submitted to them by the union and they have retrenched the employees as per the list submitted by the union . According to them the name of the workman was in the list of employees to be retrenched, sentby the union . According to them there was settlement with the union . It is further submitted that as the workman is member of the same union, he cannot challenge the retrenchment effected as per the direction of the union. In this respect I would like to point out that as per clause 2 of the agreement Ex - 38 , the parties have accepted the principle ' first come last go ' and accordingly the list of workers found
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
surplus to be retrenched category wise was annexed as Annexure -B . However annexure-B does not bear signature ofthe office bearers of the Union . On the other hand list of surplus worker is given in Annexure - B and in annexure -C list of workers retained is given. It also does not bear signature of any office bearer of the Union. From both these lists apparently it is seen that , the workman was senior as he joined in September 1980 and others joined thereafter . The workman being senior as per the accepted 'principle' first come last go , his name ought not to have been reflected in the list of employees to be retained . As both the lists does not bear signature of any office bearer ofthe union, it cannot be said that these lists were sent by the union to the company to retrench these employees and to retain the others especially as seniority rule is not reflected in these lists . In short , the version of the first party is not acceptable that the workman was retrenched asper the list submitted to them by the union . The union is also not expected to give go hy to the principle ' first come last go' . There is no evidence on record to show that these lists were sent by the union recommending the name ofthe workmanto retrench before the other employees junior to him. In this back drop I come to the conclusion that the workman being senior, his retrenchment earlier to his junior was illegal and bad in law.
9. In this respect the Id. adv for the first party has submitted that in 2008 the funchoning of first party was closed. At present the company is not at alt functioning . Therefore question of reinstatement does not arise. Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case and as the first party company is closed four years after retrenchment of the second party workman , there is no point in directing reinstatement of the workman. In the circumstances , to meet the ends of justice, I think it proper todirect the first party to pay compensation to the second party workman to the tune of Rs . 1,00,000. Accordingly, I decide the issue no . 2 in the negative and issue no.3 in the affirmative that workman is entitled to the relief by way of compensation. Thus I proceed to pass the following order .
ORDER
( 1) The reference is partly allowed with no order as to cost.
(2) The retrenchment of workman is declared as illegal and unjustified.
(3 ) The first party is directed to pay compensation to the workman to the tune of Rs . 1,00,000 for his illegal retrenchment .
Date: 30-11-2012
K. B. KATAKE , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2013 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1715
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च2, 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
Estate , Bundoo Katra , Agra and the Commandant , Central Ordnance Depot, Agra Cantt. for adjudication; and this Tribunal adjudicated the said reference vide its award dated 04-07-2012; wherein some typographical errors have been committed in para 16 of the said award.
2. Therefore , following correction is being incorporated in the award dated 04-07-2012 of this Tribunal :
का. आ. 534. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कमान्डेन्ट, सेन्ट्रल आर्डिनेन्स डिपो, आगरा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 107/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-01-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -14012/35/1993- आईआर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव
" the date of impugned order , mentioned as " 25-07-2000 " in sixth line of para 16 be read as " 27-05-1993 " ; and word " retiral " , mentioned in thirteenth line of para 16 be read as " retiral" .
New Delhi , the 6th February, 2013
Lucknow
02-01-2013
Dr. MANJU NIGAM, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2013
S.O. 534. -In pursuanceuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 1947 of 14) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 107/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the Commandant , Central Ordnance Depot , Agra and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-01-2013 .
[No. L- 14012/35/ 1993 - IR ( DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
का.आ. 535. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार चीफ जनरल मैनेजर ( टी ) , टेलीकाम डिपार्टमैन्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ न्यायालय , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-01-2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
[सं. एल-40011 / 10/2000- आईआर (डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव
Present : Dr. MANJU NIGAM , Presiding Officer
New Delhi , the 6th February, 2013
I.D No. 107/2004
Ref. No. L- 14012/ 35 /93 - IR ( DU) dated: 15-10-2004
Between:
The Secretary, C.O.D. , Chaturth Shreni Mazdoor Union , 39 -Defence Estate , Bundoo Katra , Agra
S.O. 535. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 1947 of 14) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - I.abour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to The ChiefGeneral Manager (T ) , Telecom Department and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-01-2013.
(Espousing cause of Shri D.P. Singh )
AND
[No. 1. -40011 /10/2000- IR (DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
The Commandant Central Ordnance Depot , Agra Cantt.
CORRIGENDUM
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present : SHRI J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer C.G.I.T. - cum- Labour Court , Bhubaneswar
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 24/2000 1. By order No. L- 14012/ 35/93 - IR (DU) dated : 15-10-2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between the Secretary, C.O.D. , Chaturth Shreni Mazdoor Union , 39 - Defence
Date of Passing Award - 7th December, 2012 1716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
[PART II-- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
Between :
The Chief General Manager (T) , Telecom Department , Orissa Circle. Bhubaneswar - 751001
4
... 1st Party -Management
casual workers on temporary basis only aims at to deprive them of remuneration/wages and other service benefits which are allowed to regular employees for the same and identical duties . When they are continued in employment for a fairly long period , it can be well presumed that there is regular need of their services in the various establishments of the Management .
And
Their workmen represented through The President , Orissa Door Sanchar Asthai Mazdoor Sangh ( BMS) , Sector - A , 219. Mancheswar Industrial Estate , Rasulgarh , Bhubaneswar , Orissa
...2nd Party - Union
Appearances :
Shri J.N. Jena , A.G.M. , I.aw .... For the 1st Party - Management
Shri Arjun Sahoo , ..... For the 2nd Party -Workman .
President
AWARD
This is a reference under clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 directedto this Tribunal by the Government of India , Ministry of Labour for adjudication of an industrial dispute specified in the schedule of the letter of reference vide Letter No. 1. -40011 / 10/ 2000 / IR ( DU) , dated 11-07-2000.
2. The schedule of the letter of reference reads as follows.
Whether the action of the Management ofDeptt. of Telecom , Orissa Circle by not regularizing/ giving temporary statusto the disputants is justified ? If not . to what relief the disputants are entitled ?
3. Initially no list of the disputant workmen was furnished by the Government . Later the Government furnished the list of 1208 workers running in 29 pages vide their letter of even no . dated 09-08-2005 .
5. The 1st Party - Management in its written statement has refuted the claim of the disputant workmen and submitted that the engagement of casual labour /daily rated mazdoor has been banned with effect from 30-03-1985 as per circular issued by the Department of Telecom , New Delhi . The so- called engagement of casual labourers contrary to the ban order and recruitment rule is a nullity and no right accrues to any casual labourer. The 2nd Party- Union has failed to give the details / particulars of the disputant workmen. No record is available in the office of the 1st Party - Management showing the engagement of such labourers . If any engagement has been made by any official without the approval of the Ist Party - Management or contrary to the recruitment rules , the same is not binding on the st Party- Management . No officer working under the 1st Party -Management is competent to issue any certificate for service or experience. The Department had prepared regularization and conferment of temporary status scheme on 7-11-1989 in respect of casual labourers engaged prior to 30-3-1985 . In view of the matter the reference is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. Furtherthe Chief General Manager, Telecom , has not been shown as employer in respect of any mazdoor in the list . Therefore, the reference showing the Chief General Manager, Telecom , Orissa , Bhubaneswar as the 1 st Party- Management is incompetent and liable to be dismissed . As the disputant workmen were not recruited by any of the competent authority to work in the department, the formation of Union by them is not tenable in the eye of law and the industrial dispute raised by them through the purported President is also not tenable . The purported President of the 2nd Party - Union was working as a Motor Driver in the Department under the Telecom District Manager, Cuttack . He has failed to show any evidence regarding formation of the Union and the legality of his appointment as President. Therefore the President has no locus standi to raise the present dispute . Thedisputant workmen are not the workmen within the meaning of the industrial dispute . The conciliation proceeding initiated by the purported President Shri K.C. Rout ended in failure as he had failed to substantiate his claim . Therefore the claim is liable to be dismissed.
6. On the pleadings of the parties following issues were framed.
4. The 2nd Party- Union espousing the cause of the workmen, through its statement of claim has given grounds justifying the regularization of the disputant workmen in service . It has been alleged that the disputant workmen have been working as casual workers in different offices of the Department ofthe Telecom, Orissa Circle at different places of Orissa for years together. They have served continuously and uninterruptedly for a long period and therefore they are entitled to be regularized in their respective postsby the 1st Party - Management . They are even qualified for being regularized to the posts which they are holding . posts being permanentmanent and continuous in nature. Because of non- regularization they are being paid less wages on daily basis . The method of engaging
ISSUES 1. Whether the reference is maintainable against [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1717
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 2 , 2013 /फाल्गुन 11 , 1934
the Chief General Manager , Orissa , Bhubaneswar ?
2. Whether the reference is maintainable ?
3. Whether the members of the 2nd Party are the workmen within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act ?
4. Whether the President , Orissa Doorsanchar Asthai Mazdoor Sangha is competent enough to raise the present dispute ?
5. Whether the action of the Management by not regularizing or not giving temporary status to the disputants is justified ?
Department ofTelecom, New Delhi and recruitment rules that is a nullity and no right accrues to any of the casual labourers . But the fact is that the disputant - workmen have been engaged by the officers subordinate to the 1st Party- Management. Therefore they are covered within the definition ofworkman as per clause ( s ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act and all the rights admissible under the aforesaid act accures to them and they are well entitled to raise an industrial dispute , if any, of their rights under theAct are violated or infringed by the employer . In view of the above matter it is held that the reference is maintainable and the disputant workmen come under the definition of " workmen " within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act . Both the above issues are decided inthe affirmative against the Ist Party Management .
6. What relief the disputantes are entitled to ?
ISSUE NO . 4
7. The 2nd Party - Union has examined Shri Bibhudatta Panda as W.W. - 1 and Shri Prafulla Kumar Nayak as W.W. - 2 and filed photostat copies of certain documents , but those have not been exhibited in evidence .
8. The 1st party- Management has examined Shri Jogendranath Jena as M.W. - 1 and relied on documents marked as Ext . -A to L.
FINDINGS
ISSUE No.1
11. The 1st Party- Management has also challenged the competency of the erstwhile President of Orissa Door Sanchar Asthai Mazdoor Sangh Shri K.C. Rout to raise the present dispute. Since the new President of the 2nd Party-Union has been elected , Shri K.C. Rout is no more the President of the above Union . Thus this issue becomes redundant and, more- so , the 1st Party- Management has not pressed this issue in its argument. Therefore this issue is decided against the 1st Party-Management .
ISSUE No. 5
9. The 1st Party- Management has raised an issue regarding non - maintainability of the reference against the ChiefGeneral Manager, Telecom , Orissa , Bhubaneswar on the ground that engagement of casual labourers , if any, was made by the officers of the 1st Party- Management without the approval of the Chief General Manager , Telecom, Orissa. As such he is not a necessary party in the case and the reference is not maintainable against him . But this issue does not seem to have been pressed by the 1st Party-Management as nothing has been said in this regard in the written note of argument filed on behalf of the 1st Party-Management . However, it is observed that any official act done by a subordinate casts reflection on the superior head and he is to answer for the act so done. Hence this issue is decided against the 1st Party- Management.
ISSUE No. 2 & 3
10. Since both the issues are inter- dependant and based on similar pleadings , they are taken together.
12. The 2nd Party- Union has demanded regularization ofthe disputant workmen in service stating that they have been working as casual labourers in different offices of theDepartment of Telecom , Orissa Circle at different places ofOrissa for years together without any interruption. The 1st Party- Management although has not admitted their engagement, but indicated by implications that cases of 455 workers have been taken up for regularization meaning thereby that their engagement is now not disputed. Further itis not a matter of dispute that the engagement of the disputant workmen is of casual nature made without following the recruitment rules . The Hon'ble Supreme Courtin the case of" Secretary, State of Karnataka and others - Versus - Uma Devi and Others " ( AIR 2006 SC 1806) has held that " appointment dehors due process ofselection envisaged by constitutional scheme confers no right on appointee . In the case of regularization of daily wager, temporary/ contractual employees appointed in violation of constitutional scheme , right ofCourt/executive would not extend to directing regularization to be treated as permanence in service Fact that employee has continued for long cannot also be applied for giving relief of permanency. Doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be invoked by such employees merely because in past State had regularized similarly placed employees .
The maintainability of the reference itself, has been challenged by the 1st party- Management for the reason that the 1st Party- Management does not admit the disputant-workmen as its employees in any capacity.Hence they do not come within the definition of workman . According to the Ist Party- Management if any of the disputant-workman has been engaged by the officer of the 1st Party - Management against the ban order of the
13. In such view of the matter this Tribunal lacks 1718
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2013 /PHALGUNA 11 , 1934
authorityto direct the 1st Party- Management to regularize the casual workers who are said to be engaged contraryto the ban order and recruitment rules .
14. It has been alleged by the 1 st Party- Management that most of the casual labourers among 455 members have gone to the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa and the Central Administrative Tribunal through a number of petitions with similar prayer . Hence this Tribunal cannot go beyond the orders ofthe Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court.Now it is left to the prudence and mercy of the 1st Party-Management whether it considers the regularization of the disputant workmen looking to the long period of their services rendered at BSNL or leave them to their fate . Ifthere is any order of the Central Administrative Tribunal for their regularization , follow up measures can be taken up by the disputant workmen with the Ist Party- Management . With these observations this Tribunal is constrained to hold that the action of the Management in not regularizing or giving temporary status to the disputants is justified. The Management is the sole master to decide the fate of the disputants . This issue is decided accordingly against the 2nd Party -Union .
ISSUE NO.6
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
15. In view of the findings given in Issue No. 5 the disputant workmen are not entitled to any relief from this Tribunal .
16. Reference is answered accordingly. JITENDRA SRIVASTAVA , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2013
का.आ. 536 राष्ट्रपति , श्री राधेश्याम बापूजी पाटले को, 01-02-2013 ( F/ N ) से केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायधीकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर , के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में 65 वर्ष की आयु पूरी होने अर्थात् 15-08-2017 तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , नियुक्त करते हैं ।
[सं. ए-11016/1 / 2012 - सीएलएस- II ]
अजय जोशी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 15th February , 2013
S.O. 536. The President is pleased to appoint Shri Radheshyam Bapuji Patle as Presiding Officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur w.e.f. 01-02-2013 till he attains the age 65 years i.e. up to 15-08-2017 or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[No.A- 11016/ 1 /2012 -CLS - 11 ]
AJAY JOSHI , Under Secy.
Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.