रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05 REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05 प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 24] नई दिल्ली, जून 9—जून 15, 2013, शनिवार/ज्येष्ठ 19—ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935
No. 24] NEW DELHI, JUNE 9—JUNE 15, 2013, SATURDAY/JYAISTHA 19—JYAISTHA 25, 1935
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
वित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालय
(राजस्व विभाग)(राजस्व विभाग)(राजस्व विभाग)(राजस्व विभाग)(राजस्व विभाग)
(Department of Revenue)
(केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड)
(केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड)
(केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड)
(केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड)
(केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क बोर्ड)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS) नई दिल्ली, 29 मई, 2013
New Delhi, the 29th May, 2013
का.आ. 1109.का.आ. 1109.का.आ. 1109.का.आ. 1109.का.आ. 1109. —केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय
प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4)
के अनुसरण में, राजस्व विभाग, केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमा शुल्क
बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय, 80 प्रतिशत से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने
हिन्दी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अध्सिूचित करती हैः—
S.O. 1109.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language, (use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Department of Revenue, Central Board of Excise and Customs, whereof more than 80% of the staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :—
Office of the Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Haldwani, Uttarakhand.
केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, सीमा शुल्क,
सेवाकर का कार्यालय,
हल्द्वानी, उत्तराखंड
[F. No. E-11017/1/2012-Hindi-II] [फा. सं. ई-11017/1/2012-हिन्दी- II]
CHANDER BHAN NARNAULI, Director (OL) चन्द्र भान नारनौली, निदेशक (राजभाषा)
2446 GI/2013
(2977)2978 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]
;वित्तीय सेवाएं विभागद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 31 मई, 2013
का.आ. 1110.—राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ;प्रबंध् एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध्द्ध स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड ;1द्ध के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ;उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरणद्ध अध्निियम, 1970/1980 की धरा 9 की उप-धरा 3 के ख्ांड ;गद्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, नीचे दी गई सारणी के कॉलम 3 में विनिदष्ट व्यक्तियों को उक्त सारणी के कॉलम 2 में विनिदष्ट व्यक्तियों के स्थान पर कॉलम ;1द्ध में विनिदष्ट राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंकों के निदेशक के रूप में तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक, नामित करती है :—
सारणी
क्र.सं. बैंक का नाम मौजूदा निदेशक नवीन व्यक्ति
;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध
1. ओरियंटल बैंक ऑपफ कामर्स श्री बी. श्रीनिवास श्री एस. गणेश,
पीसीजीएम, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, बजटीय एवं व्यय नियंत्राण विभाग, केन्द्रीय कार्यालय, मेन भवन, दूसरा तल, पफोर्ट, मुम्बई-400 001
2. यूनियन बैंक ऑपफ इंडिया श्री चंदन सिन्हा श्री दीपक सघल,
पीसीजीएम एवं क्षेत्राीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, 6, संसद मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110 001
3. पंजाब नैशलल बैंक श्री एन. एस. विश्वनाथन श्री बी. पी. कानूनगो,
पीसीजीएम एवं क्षेत्राीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, 13 एवं 15, एन. एस. रोड़, कोलकाता-700 001, पश्चिम बंगाल
4. सडिकेट बैंक श्री ए. एस. राव श्री एम. राजेश्वर राव,
मुख्य महाप्रबंध्क, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, जोखिम निगरानी विभाग, केन्द्रीय कार्यालय भवन, 22वां तल, पफोर्ट, मुम्बई-400 001
5. पंजाब एंड सध् बैंक श्री बी. पी. कानूनगो श्री प्रदीप्ता के. जेना,
मुख्य महाप्रबंध्क एवं क्षेत्राीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, पोस्ट बाक्स नं. 162, साउथ गांध्ी मैदान, पटना-800 001
6. इंडियन बैंक डॉ. एन. कृष्ण मोहन श्री सथ्यान डेविड,
मुख्य महाप्रबंध्क एवं क्षेत्राीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक, रामबाग सर्कल, टोंक रोड, पोस्ट बाक्स नं. 12, जयपुर
[पफा. सं. 6/34/2013-बीओ-I]
श्रेया गुहा, निदेशक2979 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 31st May, 2013
S.O. 1110.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section 3 of Section 9 of the Banking Compa- nies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates the persons specified in column (3) of the table below as Directors of nationalized banks specified in column (1) thereof in place of the persons specified in column (2) of said Table, with immediate effect and until further orders :—
TABLE
Sl. Name of the Bank Name of the Existing Director Name of new persons No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
1. Oriental Bank of Commerce Shri B. Srinivas Shri S. Ganesh,
PCGM, Reserve Bank of India, Department of Budgetary & Expenditure Control, Central Office, Main Building, 2nd Floor, Fort, Mumbai-400 001
2. Union Bank of India Shri Chandan Sinha Shri Deepak Singhal,
PCGM and Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, 6, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001
3. Punjab National Bank Shri N. S. Vishvanathan Shri B. P. Kanungo,
PCGM and Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, 13 and 15, N. S. Road, Kolkata-700 001, West Bengal
4. Syndicate Bank Shri A. S. Rao Shri M. Rajeshwar Rao,
CGM, Reserve Bank of India, Risk Monitoring Department Central Office Building, 22nd Floor, Fort, Mumbai-400 001
5. Punjab and Sind Bank Shri B. P. Kanungo Shri Pradipta K. Jena,
CGM and Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, P. B. No. 162, South Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800 001
6. Indian Bank Dr. N. Krishna Mohan Shri Sathyan David,
CGM and Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Rambagh Circle, Tonk Road, P. B. No. 12, Jaipur
[F. No. 6/34/2013-BO-I]
SREYA GUHA, Director2980 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]
मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालयमानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालयमानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालयमानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालयमानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय
(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग)(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग)(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग)(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग)(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग)
(राजभाषा यूनिट)(राजभाषा यूनिट)(राजभाषा यूनिट)(राजभाषा यूनिट)(राजभाषा यूनिट)
नई दिल्ली, 4 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1111.का.आ. 1111.का.आ. 1111.का.आ. 1111.का.आ. 1111. —केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4)
के अनुसरण में, मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय (उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग) के अंतर्गत इंदिरा गांधी राष्ट्रीय मुक्त विश्वविद्यालय के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय
केन्द्रों को, ऐसे कार्यालयों के रूप में जिसके 80. से अध्कि कर्मचारी-वृंृद ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अध्सिूचित करती है :
1. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, प्लॉट नं. जे-2/1, ब्लॉक बी-1, मोहन को-ऑपरेटिव इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, मथुरा रोड़, नई दिल्ली-110 044 2. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, एपफ 634-636, पालम एक्सटेंशन, रामपफल चौक ;नजदीक सेक्टर-7द्ध, द्वारका, नई दिल्ली-110 045 3. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, दूसरी मंजिल, बिस्कोमान टावर, पश्चिम गांध्ी मैदान, पटना-800 001, बिहार
4. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, सांची कॉम्पलैक्स, तीसरा तल, बोर्ड ऑपफ सेकेंडरी एज्यूकेशन के सामने, शिवाजी नगर, भोपाल-462 018, मध्य प्रदेश
5. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, चौहान निवास बिल्डग, खलीनी, शिमला-171 002, हिमाचल प्रदेश
6. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, एस.सी.ओ.-208, सेक्टर-14, पंचकुला-134 109, हरियाणा
7. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, गांध्ी स्मृति एवं दर्शन समिति, राजघाट, नई दिल्ली-110 002
8. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, सी-53, सेक्टर-62, इंस्टीट्यूशनल एरिया, नोएडा-201 305, उत्तर प्रदेश
9. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, बी-1/33, सेक्टर-एच, अलीगंज, लखनउफ-226 024, उत्तर प्रदेश
10. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, रेस्ट हाउफस एंड ई. एम. ऑपिफस हॉल, सेक्टर-1, शंकर नगर, रायपुर-492 007, छत्तीसगढ़ 11. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, 70/79, सेक्टर-7, पटेल मार्ग, मानसरोवर, जयपुर-302 020, राजस्थान
12. इग्नू क्षेत्राीय केन्द्र, 6, सुभाष मार्ग, सुभाष कॉलोनी, होमगार्ड कार्यालय के नजदीक, करनाल-132 001.
[सं. 11011-1/2013-रा.भा.ए. ]
आर. पी. सिसोदिया, संयुक्त सचिव
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
(Department of Higher Education)
(O. L. UNIT)
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2013
S.O. 1111.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following Regional Centres of Indira Gandhi National Open University under the Ministry of Human Resource Development (Department of Higher Education) as offices, whose more than 80% members of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :
Sl. No. Name and address of the Regional Centre
1. IGNOU Regional Centre, Plot No. J-2/1, Block B-1, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110 044
2. IGNOU Regional Centre, F-634-636, Palam Extn., Ramphal Chowk (Near Sector-7), Dwarka, New Delhi-110 045
3. IGNOU Regional Centre, IInd Floor, Biscoman Tower, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800 001, Bihar2981 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 Sl. No. Name and address of the Regional Centre
4. IGNOU Regional Centre, Sanchi Complex, IIIrd Floor, Opp. Board of Secondary Education, Shivaji Nagar, Bhopal-462 016, M.P.
5. IGNOU Regional Centre, Chauhan Niwas Building, Khalini, Shimla-171 002, H.P.
6. IGNOU Regional Centre, S.C.O.-208, Sector-14, Panchkula-134 109 (Haryana)
7. IGNOU Regional Centre, Gandhi Samriti Evam Darshan Samiti, Rajghat, New Delhi-110 002 8. IGNOU Regional Centre, C-53, Sector-62, Institutional Area, Noida-201 305, U.P.
9. IGNOU Regional Centre, B-1/33, Sector-H, Aliganj, Lucknow-226 024, U.P.
10. IGNOU Regional Centre, Rest House & E.M. Office Hall, Sector-1, Shankar Nagar, Raipur-492 007, Chattisgarh
11. IGNOU Regional Centre, 70/79, Sector-7, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur-302 020, Rajasthan 12. IGNOU Regional Centre, 6, Subhash Marg, Subhash Colony, Near Home Gaurd Office, Karnal-132 001.
[F. No. 11011-1/2013-O.L. U.]
R. P. SISODIA, Jt. Secy.
विद्युत मंत्राालय
नई दिल्ली, 5 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1112.—सार्वजनिक स्थान ;अप्राध्कृित अध्भिोगियों की बेदखलीद्ध अध्निियम, 1971 ;1971 का 40द्ध की धरा 3 के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड ;एनटीपीसीद्ध के अध्किारी श्री संजीत कुमार सेनापति को प्रबंध्क ;मानव संसाध्नद्ध के पद पर नियुक्त करती है, यह पद भारत सरकार के राजपत्रिात अध्किारी के समकक्ष है, तथा उक्त प्रयोजन के लिए विद्युत मंत्राालय के दिनांक 16 नवम्बर, 2000 के एस.ओ. सं. 128 में भारत सरकार की अध्सिूचना में निम्नलिखित अतिरिक्त संशोध्न करती हैं, अर्थात् :—
2. उक्त अध्सिूचना में, कॉलम 1 और 2 के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टियों के लिए, क्रम सं. 4 के सामने, तालिका में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियों को प्रतिस्थापित किया जाएगा, अर्थात् :—
1
2
फ्4 श्री संजीत कुमार सेनापति को प्रबंध्क ;मानव संसाध्नद्ध, नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड ;एनटीपीसी एनटीपीसी लिमिटेड, तालचेर थर्मल पावर स्टेशन लिमिटेडद्ध इसके तालचेर थर्मल पावर स्टेशन ;ओडिशाद्ध
के प्रशासनिक नियंत्राणाध्ीन संबंध्ति सभी परिसर ।
[फा. सं. 8/6/1992-थर्मल- I]
आई. सी. पी. केशरी, संयुक्त सचिव
टिप्पणी ः मुख्य अध्सिूचना भारत सरकार के दिनांक 16 नवम्बर, 2000 के एस.ओ. सं. 128 के माध्यम से भारत के राजपत्रा में प्रकाशित की गई थी और दिनांक 30 जून, 2004 के एस.ओ. सं. 1676 के माध्यम से पिछला संशोध्न किया गया था ।
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi, the 5th June, 2013
S.O. 1112.— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sanjit Kumar Senapati, Manager (Human Resources), an officer of the National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC Limited) equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officer of the Government of India and for that purpose makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Power number S.O. 128, dated the 16th November, 2000, namely :—
2982 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]2. In the said notification, in the Table, against serial number 4, for the entries under column 1 and 2, the following entries shall be substituted, namely:-
1
2
"4 Shri Sanjit Kumar Senapati, Manager (Human Resources), All premises belonging to National Thermal NTPC Limited, Talcher Thermal Power Station. Power Corporation Limited (NTPC Limited) and under the Administrative Control of its Talcher Thermal Power Station (Odisha).
[F. No. 8/6/1992- TH-I]
I. C. P. KESHARI, Jt. Secy.
Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 128, dated the 16 November, 2000 and last amended vide number S.O. 1676, dated the 30th June, 2004.
उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्राालय
;उपभोक्ता मामले विभागद्ध
;भारतीय मानक ब्यूरोद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 4 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1113.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप-नियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिन संशोध्न के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :—
अनुसूची
क्रम सं. स्थापित भारतीय मानकों/संशोध्नों की नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित स्थापित तिथि संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों/संशोध्नों
यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध ;4द्ध
1. संशोध्न संख्या-1 आईएस 638 : 1979 कुछ नहीं मार्च, 2013 शीट के रबड़ जोड़ तथा रबड़ अन्तर्वेशित जोड़ की — विशिष्टि ;दूसरा पुनरीक्षणद्ध
2. संशोध्न संख्या-2 आईएस 9382 : 1979 कुछ नहीं मई, 2013 टार एवं बिटुमनी सामग्रियों के परीक्षण की प(तियां थीन पिफल्म ओवन परीक्षण द्वारा ताप एवं वायु के प्रभाव ज्ञात करना
3. संशोध्न संख्या-1 आईएस 4669 : 1968 कुछ नहीं मई, 2013 पोलीविनाईल क्लोराइड रेजिन के लिए परीक्षण प(तियां
4. संशोध्न संख्या-1 आईएस 11720 भाग 1 : कुछ नहीं नवंबर, 2011 1986 कृत्रिाम रबड़ के परीक्षण की प(तियां भाग 1 एन्टीऑक्सीडेंट ज्ञात करना
5. संशोध्न संख्या-1 आईएस 10171 : 1991 कुछ नहीं मई, 2013 खाद्य सामग्री की पैकेजग के लिए उपयुक्त प्लास्टिक हेतु मार्गदशका ;दूसरा पुनरीक्षणद्ध2983 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 इन भारतीय मानकों/संशोध्नों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9, बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ पीसीडी/जी-7 ;गजटद्ध] ए. के. दत्ता, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;पेट्रोलियम, कोयला एवं संबंध्ति उत्पादद्ध
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2013
S. O. 1113.—In pursuance of Clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendments particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated :—
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. No. and Year and Title of the Indian No. and Year of Indian Date of Established Standards/Amendments Established Standards, if any, Superseded
by the New Indian Standard
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध ;4द्ध
1. Amendment No. 1 to IS 638 : 1979 NA March, 2013 Specification for Sheet Rubber
Jointing and Rubber Insertion
Jointing (Second Revision)
2. Amendment No. 2 to IS 9382 : 1979 NA May, 2013 Methods for Testing Tar and
Bituminous Materials :
Determination of Effect of Heat
and Air by Thin Film Oven Test
3. Amendment No. 1 to IS 4669 : 1968 NA May, 2013 Methods of Test for Polyvinyl
Chloride Resins
4. Amendment No. 1 to IS 11720 (Part 1) : NA November, 2011 1986 Methods of Test for Synthetic Rubber
Part 1 Determination of Antioxidants
5. Amendment No. 1 to IS 10171 : 1999 NA May, 2013 Guide on Suitability of Plastics for
Food Packaging (Second Revision)
Copy of these Standards/Amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bengalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. PCD/G-7 (Gazette)]
A. K. DATTA, Scientist 'F' & Head (Petroleum, Coal and Related Products)2984 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 4 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1114.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप-नियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक;कोंद्ध में संशोध्न किया गया/किए गए हैं :—
अनुसूची
क्रम संशोध्ति भारतीय मानक की संशोध्न संख्या और तिथि संशोध्न लागू होने सं. संख्या और वर्ष
की तिथि
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध ;4द्ध
1. आईएस 12933 ;भाग 2द्ध : 2003 संशोध्न नं. 3 तुरंत सौर सपाट पटि्टका संग्राहक-विशिष्टि मई 2013 भाग 2 घटक ;दूसरा पुनरीक्षणद्ध
2. संशोध्न नं. 1 आईएस 8451 : 2011 संशोध्न नं. 1 तुरंत उच्च दाब के गैस सिलिण्डरों का आवध्कि मई 2013 निरीक्षण एवं परीक्षण-रीति संहिता ;दूसरा पुनरिक्षणद्ध
3. संशोध्न नं. 1 आईएस 15935 : 2011 संशोध्न नं. 1 तुरंत मोटर वाहन के लिए ईंध्न के रूप में संपीड़ित जून 2013 प्राकृतिक गैस ;सी एन जीद्ध के ऑन-बोर्ड भंडारण हेतु समिश्र सिलडर-विशिष्टि
4. संशोध्न नं. 3 आईएस 4379 : 2011 संशोध्न नं. 3 तुरंत औद्योगिक गैस सिलडर में तत्व की पहचान जून 2013 ;पहला पुनरीक्षणद्ध
इस संशोध्न की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9, बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयोंः कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं । भारतीय मानकों को http://www.standardsbis.in द्वारा इंटरनैट पर खरीदा जा सकता है ।
[संदर्भ एम.ई.डी./जी-2 : 1] तेजवीर सह, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;यांत्रिाक इंजीनियरगद्ध
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2013
S. O. 1114.—In pursuance of Clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :—
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. No. and Year of the Indian No. and Year of Date from which the Standards
the Amendment Amendment shall
have effect
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध ;4द्ध
1. IS 12933 (PT 2) : 2003 Solar Flat Plate Amendment No. 3 With immediate effect Collector-Specification : Part 2 May 2013 Components (Second Revision)2985 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 ;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध ;4द्ध
2. Amendment No. 1 to IS 8451 : 2009 Amendment No. 1 With immediate effect Periodic inspection and testing of high May 2013
pressure gas cylinders-Code of Practice
3. Amendment No. 1 to IS 15935:2011 Amendment No.1 -do-
Composite cylinders for on-board June 2013 storage of compressed natural gas
(CNG) as a fuel for automotive vehicle— Specification
4. Amendment No. 3 to IS 4379:1981 Amendment No. 3 -do-
Identification of the contents of June 2013 industrial gas cylinders (First Revision)
Copies of this Amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bengalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram. On-line purchase of Indian Standard can be made at : http:// www.standardsbis.in.
[Ref. MED/G-2 : 1]
T. V. SINGH, Scientist 'F' & Head (Mechanical Engineering)
नई दिल्ली, 5 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1115.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप-नियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद््द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक;कोद्ध में संशोध्न किया गया/किये गये हैं :—
अनुसूची
संशोध्ति भारतीय मानक;कोंद्ध की संख्या और वर्ष संशोध्न की संख्या और तिथि संशोध्न लागू होने की तिथि
;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध
आई एस 9537 ;भाग 3द्धः 1983 की संशोध्न संख्या 2 02 जून, 2011 31-05-2013
इस भारतीय संशोध्न की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9, बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी हैदराबाद, जयपुुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ : ईटी 14/टी-48]
आर. सी. मैथ््यू, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;विद्युत तकनीकीद्धू
New Delhi, the 5th June, 2013
S.O. 1115.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standard hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards, particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :
SCHEDULE
No. and Year of the Indian Standards No. and Year of the Date from which the Amendment
Amendment shall have effect
(1)
(2)
(3)
IS 9537 (Part 3) : 1983 Specification 02 June, 2011 31-05-2013 for conduits for electrical installations
Part 3 Rigid plain conduits of insulating
materials2986 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] Copy of the Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices :
Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneswar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram.
[ Ref. ET 14/T-48]
R. C. MATHEW, Scientist 'F'and Head (Electrotechnical)
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1116.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ;प्रमाणनद्ध विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप-विनियम 5 के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद््द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस किए गए हैं :—
अनुसूची
क्रम. सं. लाइसेंस संख्या स्वीकृृत करने की लाइसेंसधरी का भारतीय मानक भा मा भाग अनु वर्ष तिथि वर्ष माह नाम एवं पता का शीर्षक संख्या
;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
01 3944172 07 मई, 2013 मीराज इन्डस्ट्रीज एक पफेजी छोटे एसी और 996 0 0 2009
21, सम्राट इन्डस्ट्रीयल यूनीवर्सल बिजली की मोटर एरिया, एस टी वर्कशॉप के पीछे, गोंडल रोड, राजकोट, गुजरात-360004
02 3942875 01 मई, 2013 क्रिष्ना ज्वेलर्स स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधतुएं, 1417 0 0 1999
कोर्ट रोड के पास, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शु(ता मानावडर, जूनागढ, एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि गुजरात-362630
03 3944374 08 मई, 2013 श्री सौभाग्या कनकन स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधतुएं, 1417 0 0 1999
14, राज प्लाजा, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शु(ता पेलेस रोड, राजकोट, एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि गुजरात-360001
04 3944475 08 मई, 2013 घनश्याम ज्वेलर्स स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधतुएं, 1417 0 0 1999
जवेरी बाजार, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शु(ता भीमनाथ रोड, बावरा, एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि जिला अमरेली, गुजरात-365421
05 3946176 13 मई, 2013 श्री श्याम ज्वेलर्स स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधतुएं, 1417 0 0 1999
हवेली मार्केट, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शु(ता काजीनो चकलो, एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि मांडवी टॉवर, जामनगर, गुजरात-361001
06 3946277 13 मई, 2013 जोगीया ज्वेलर्स स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधतुएं, 1417 0 0 1999
ग्राउन्ड फ्रलोर, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शु(ता मानेक चौक, एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि जवेरी बाजार, पोरबंदर, गुजरात-3605752987 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 ;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
07 3948887 21 मई, 2013 कल्पद्रुम स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधतुएं, 1417 0 0 1999
पहेली मंजिल, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शु(ता साटा बाजार, एवं मुहरांकन-विशिष्टि अलंकार चेम्बर, वेरावल जिला जूनागढ़, गुजरात-362265
08 3951169 29 मई, 2013 पाट्रन स्टील इन्डस्ट्रीज कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए 1786 0 0 2008
305, तीसरी मंजिल, उच्च सामथ्र्य विकसित फ्सुरभी मोलय्, इस्पात छड़ और तार बाध्बाडी रोड, भावनगर, गुजरात-364240
09 3947279 16 मई, 2013 अर्श अलोयस सामान्य संरचना इस्पात हेतु 2830 0 0 2012
ऑपिफस नं. 119, पुनर्वेल्लन के लिये कार्बन पहली मंजिल ढलर्वा इस्पात इंगट, विलेट, माध्व दर्शन, ब्लूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टि वाध्वाडी रोड, गुजरात-364001
10 3947380 16 मई, 2013 राज इस्पात सामान्य संरचना इस्पात हेतु 2830 0 0 2012
ऑपिफस नं. 119, पुनर्वेल्लन के लिये कार्बन पहली मंजिल, ढलर्वा इस्पात इंगट, विलेट, माध्व दर्शन, ब्लूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टि वाध्वाडी रोड, गुजरात-364001
11 3949283 21 मई, 2013 अजन इस्पात सामान्य संरचना इस्पात हेतु 2830 0 0 2012
ऑपिफस नं. 119, पुनर्वेल्लन के लिये कार्बन पहली मंजिल, ढलर्वा इस्पात इंगट, विलेट, माध्व दर्शन, ब्लूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टि वाध्वाडी रोड, गुजरात-364001
12 3951270 29 मई, 2013 जिनियस इलेक्ट्रोटेक लिमिटेड बिजली के घरेलू खाद्य 4250 0 0 1980
सर्वे नं. 43, मेध्पर बोरीची, मिक्सर ;द्रवीकारक और तहसील अंजार, गांध्ीनगर ग्रांइडरद्ध की विशिष्टि जिला कच्छ, गुजरात-370110
13 3948079 20 मई, 2013 रीलाइन्स पाइप इन्डस्ट्रीज पानी की आपूत के लिए 4984 0 0 1995 प्लॉट नं. 609, उच्च घनत्व वाले जीआईडीसी-2, पॉलिएथिलीन पाइप- जूनागढ़, गुजरात-362037 विशिष्टि
14 3948382 21 मई, 2013 श्री राम इन्डस्ट्रीज पानी की आपूत के लिए 4984 0 0 1995 गोंडल रोड, उच्च घनत्व वाले सेन्ट मेरी स्कूल, पॉलिएथिलीन पाइप- जिला राजकोट, विशिष्टि गांडल, गुजरात-3603112988 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] ;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
15 3951371 29 मई, 2013 केपिटल पोलिप्लास्ट पानी की आपूत के लिए 4984 0 0 1995 ;गुजरातद्ध प्रा. लि. उच्च घनत्व वाले सर्वे नं. 3 फ्रलोर नं. 76-79 पॉलिएथिलीन पाइप- किशन दिहाइड्रेशन के पीछे, विशिष्ट एन.एच. 27, तालुका गोंडल, भोजपुरा, जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360311
16 3949788 24 मई, 2013 गुरुकृृपा इलेक्ट्रिकल्स निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट 8034 0 0 2002
प्लॉट नं. 16, जलाराम इन्डस्ट्रीज एरिया, रुडा ट्रान्सपोर्ट नगर के पीछे, एनएच-8 बी, गुजरात-360003
17 3950672 28 मई, 2013 अंलकित मैन्युपफेक्चरर्स निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट 8034 0 0 2002
फ्वासुकी एस्टेटय् श्री हरी इन्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया, स्ट्रीट नं. 5, आजी रग रोड, गुजरात-360004
18 3951876 30 मई, 2013 लीवा पम्पस निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट 8034 0 0 2002
खोडियार होटल के पास, श्री हरी इन्डस्ट्रीज जोन-1, मैन रोड, आजी वसाहत रग रोड, राजकोट, गुजरात-360003
19 3952171 31 मई, 2013 एचएमपी पम्पस निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट 8034 0 0 2002
एसआर राजलक्ष्मी इन्डस्ट्रीज, एनएच 8-वी बावडी रोड, वावडी, जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360004
20 3945275 31 मई, 2013 पेसीपिफक इलेक्ट्रिकल्स निमज्जनीय पम्प सेट 9283 0 0 1995
प्लॉट नं. 10, की मोटरें सखिया नगर, गोकुलधम मैन रोड, जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360004
21 3944980 09 मई, 2013 डोल्पफीन स्टोरेज सिस्टम पानी के भण्डार हेतु 12701 0 0 1996
प्रा.लि., प्लॉट नं. 1005-ए, टंकियां पफेज 3, जी.आई.डी.सी. वाध्वान सिटी, जिला सुरेन्द्रनगर, गुजरात-3630352989 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 ;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
22 3949182 23 मई, 2013 गुरूकृृपा इलेक्ट्रीकल्स खुले कुएं के लिए 14220 0 0 1994 प्लॉट नं. 16, निमज्जय पम्प सेट जलाराम इन्डस्ट्रीज ऐरीया, गुडा ट्रान्सपोर्ट नगर, एनएच-8वी, राजकोट, गुजरात-360003
[सं. केन्द्रीय प्रमाणन विभाग/13ः11]
एम. राधकृृष्ना, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2013
S.O. 1116.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certificate) Regulations, 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Sl. Licence Grant Date Name and address Title of the IS No. Part Sec. Year No. No. of the Party Standard
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) (7) (8) (9)
01. 3944172 07-05-2013 M/s Miraj Industries Single-phase small 996 0 0 2009 21, Samrat Industrial Area, ac and universal electric
Behind S.T. Work Shop, motors
Gondal Road, Rajkot,
Gujarat-360004
02. 3942875 01-05-2013 M/s Krishna Jewellers Gold and Gold Alloys 1417 0 0 1999 Near Court Road, Jewellery/Artefacts-
Manavadar, Junagadh, Fineness and Marking-
Gujarat-362630 Specification
03. 3944374 08-05-2013 M/s Shri Saubhagya Gold and Gold Alloys, 1417 0 0 1999 Kankan 14, Raj Plaza, Jewellery/Artefacts-
Palace Road, Rajkot Fineness and Marking-
Gujarat-360001 Specification
04. 3944375 08-05-2013 M/s Ghanshyam Jewellers Gold and Gold Alloys, 1417 0 0 1999 Zaveri Bazar, Bhimnath Jewellery/Artefacts-
Road, Babra, Fineness and Marking-
District : Amreli, Specification
Gujarat-365421
05. 3946176 13-05-2013 M/s Shree Shyam Gold and Gold Alloys, 1417 0 0 1999 Jewellers Jewellery/Artefacts-
Haveli Market, Kaji Fineness and Marking-
No Chaklo, Mandavi Specification
Tower, Jamnagar,
Gujarat-3610012990 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] ;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
06. 3946277 13-05-2013 M/s Jogia Jewellers Gold and Gold Alloys, 1417 0 0 1999 Ground Floor, Manek Jewellery/Artefacts-
Chowk, Zaveri Bazar, Fineness and Marking-
Porbandar, Specification
Gujarat-360575
07. 3948887 21-05-2013 M/s Kalpdrum Gold and Gold Alloys, 1417 0 0 1999 First Floor, Satta Bazar, Jewellery/Artefacts-
Alankar Chamber, Fineness and Marking-
Veraval, Distt. Junagadh Specification
Gujarat-362265
08. 3951169 29-05-2013 M/s Patran Steel Specification for high 1786 0 0 2008 Industries strength deformed steel
Patran Steel Industries bars and wires for
305, 3rd Floor, concrete reinforcement
"Surbhi Mall"
Waghwadi Road,
Bhavnagar,
Gujarat-364240
09. 3947279 16-05-2013 M/s Arsh Alloys Carbon steel cast billet 2830 0 0 2012 Office No. 119, ingots, billets, blooms
At 1st Floor, and slabs for re-rolling
Madhav Darshan, into steel for general
Waghawadi Road, structural purposes
Bhavnagar,
Gujarat-364001
10. 3947380 16-05-2013 M/s Raj Ispat Carbon steel cast billet 2830 0 0 2012 Office No. 119, ingots, billets, blooms
Madhav Darshan, and slabs for re-rolling
1st Floor, Waghawadi into steel for general
Road, Bhavnagar, structural purposes
Gujarat-364001
11. 3949283 21-05-2013 M/s Azan Ispat Carbon steel cast billet 2830 0 0 2012 Street No. 2, Madhiya ingots, billets, blooms
Road, Kumbharwada, and slabs for re-rolling
Bhavnagar, into steel for general
Gujarat-364006 structural purposes
12. 3951270 29-05-2013 M/s Genus Electrotech Specification for 4250 0 0 1980 Limited Survey No. 43, Domestic Electric Food-
Meghpar Borichi, Mixers (Liquidizes and
Taluka-Anjar, Grinders)
Gandhidham,
District : Kachchh
Gujarat-3701102991 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 ;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
13. 3948079 20-05-2013 M/s Reliance Pipe Specification for 4984 0 0 1995 Industries high density polyethylene Plot No. 609, GIDC-2, pipes for potable water Junagadh, supplies Gujarat-362037
14. 3948382 21-05-2013 M/s Shree Ram Specification for 4984 0 0 1995 Industries high density polyethylene Gondal Road, pipes for potable water Near Saint Marry School, supplies District Rajkot, Gondal, Gujarat-360311
15. 3951371 29-05-2013 M/s Capital Polyplast Specification for 4984 0 0 1995 (GUJ.) high density polyethylene PVT. Ltd. pipes for potable water Survey No. 3, supplies Plot No. 76-79, Behind Kisan Dehydration NH-27, Taluka Gondal, Bhojpara District : Rajkot Gujarat-360311
16. 3949788 24-05-2013 M/s Gurukrupa Electricals Submersible Pumpsets 8034 0 0 2002 Plot No. 16, Specification Jalaram Ind. Area, Behind RUDA Transport Nagar, NH-8B, Gujarat-360003
17. 3950672 28-05-2013 M/s Alankit Submersible Pumpsets 8034 0 0 2002 Manufacturers Specification "Vasuki Estate", Shri Hari Industrial Area, Street No. 5, Aji Ring Road, Gujarat-360004
18. 3951876 30-05-2013 M/s Leeva Pumps Submersible Pumpsets 8034 0 0 2002 Near Shri Khodiyar Hotel, Specification Shri Hari Ind. Zone-1, Main Road, Aji Vasahat Ring Road, Rajkot, Gujarat-360003
19. 3952171 31-05-2013 M/s HMP Pumps Submersible Pumpsets 8034 0 0 2002 C/o-SR Rajlakshmi Ind., Specification Shivam Ind. Estate N.H. 8-B, Vavdi Road, Vavdi, District Rajkot, Gujarat-360004
20. 3945275 10-05-2013 M/s Pacific Electricals Motors for Submersible 9283 0 0 1995 Plot No. 10, Sakhiya Nagar Pumpsets-Specification Gokuldham Main Road, District : Rajkot, Gujarat-360004
Rajkot, Gujarat-3600032992 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] ;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध ;7द्ध ;8द्ध ;9द्ध
21. 3944980 09-05-2013 M/s Dolphin Storage Specification for rotational 12701 0 0 1996 Systems Pvt. Ltd., moulded polyethylene Plot No. 1005-A, water storage tanks Phase III G.I.D.C., Wadhwan City. District: Surendernagar Gujarat-363035
22. 3949182 23-05-2013 M/s Gurukrupa Electricals Openwell Submersible 14220 0 0 1994 Plot No. 16, Pumpsets-Specification Jalaram Ind. Area, Behind Ruda Transport-
nagar Gujarat-360003
[No. CMD/13:11]
M. RADHAKRISHNA, Scientist 'F' and Head
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1117.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ;प्रमाणनद्ध विनियन, 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपनियम ;6द्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, के लाइसेंस रद्द किए गए हैं :
अनुसूची
क्रम संख्या लाइसेंस संख्या लाइसेंसधरी का नाम एवं पता लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम रद्दीकरण तिथि
1. 7949711 अलमाईटी एग्रोटेक प्राइवेट लिमिटेड हस्तप्रचलित उर्वरक 17 मई, 2013
जी 1934-35, ब्राडकास्टरों की विशिष्टि
लोध्ीका जीआईडीसी,
मेटोडा, तालुका लोध्ीका,
जिला राजकोट, गुजरात-360021
[सं. केन्द्रीय प्रमाणन विभाग/13ः11]
एम. राधकृष्ना, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2013
S. O. 1117.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certificate) Regulations, 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below have cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. Licences No. CM/L- Name and Address of Aricle/Process with relevant Date of Expiry
the Licensee Indian Standards Coverd by
the licence cancelled/suspension
;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध 1. 7949711 M/s. Almighty Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., Specification for Manually 17-5-2013 G-1934-35, Lodhika GIDC, Operated Fertilizer
Metoda, Talula Lodhika Broadcaster
District : Rajkot, Gujarat-360021
[No. CMD/13:11]
M. RADHAKRISHNA, Scientist 'F' & Head2993 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935
नई दिल्ली, 6 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1118.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया हैं उसे वापिस ले लिया गया है :
अनुसूची
टिप्पणी क्रम रद्द किये गये भारतीय मानक की संख्या, वर्ष भारत के राजपत्रा भाग 2, खंड 3, संख्या और शीर्षक उपखंड ;IIद्ध में का. आ. संख्या
और तिथि प्रकाशित
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध 1. आई एस 1448 ;भाग 45द्ध : 1962 विमानन — मानक प(ति द्वारा विमानन ईंध्न का अपस्पफोट अभिलक्षण
अप्रचालित हो गया है
[संदर्भ पीसीडी/जी-7 ;गजटद्ध]
ए. दत्ता, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;पीसीडीद्ध
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2013
S.O. 1118.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, it is, hereby notified that the Indian Standard, particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule hereinafter has been cancelled and stands withdrawn :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards S.O. No. & Date published Remarks No. Cancelled in the Gazette India, Part II,
Section 3, Sub-section (ii)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1. IS 1448 (Part 45): 1962 Knock — The Standard has become obsolete Characteristics of Aviation Fuels by the Aviation Method
[Ref. PCD/G-7 (Gazette)]
A. DATTA, Scientist 'F' & Head (PCD)
नई दिल्ली, 7 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1119.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ;कोंद्ध में संशोध्न किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
क्रम संशोध्ति भारतीय मानक ;कोंद्ध की संख्या संशोध्न की संख्या संशोध्न लागू होने संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक और तिथि की तिथि ;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध 1. आईएस 1879ः2010 धतवध्र्य ढलवां लोहा पाइप संशोध्न संख्या 3 04-06-2013 पिफटग-विशिष्टि ;तीसरा पुनरीक्षणद्ध मार्च 2013
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ एमटीडी 6/T-1]
पी. घोष, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;एमटीडीद्ध2994 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]
New Delhi, the 7th June, 2013
S.O. 1119.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Amendment, Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl. IS. No. & Title of the No. & year of the Date from which the No. amendment (s)
amendment amendment shall
have effect
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. IS1879:2010 Malleable cast iron pipe Amendment No. 3 04-06-2013 fittings—Specification (third revision) March 2013
Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkatta Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. MTD 6/T-1]
P. GHOSH, Scientist 'F' & Head (Met Engg.)
नई दिल्ली, 7 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1120.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों का संशोध्न का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गए हैं :—
अनुसूची
क्रम संशोध्ति भारतीय मानक की संख्या, संशोध्न संख्या संशोध्न लागू होने संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक और वर्ष की तिथि
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध
1. आई एस 13690 : 1992 संशोध्न संख्या 1 31 मार्च, 2013 पाश्च्युरिकृत मक्खन-विशिष्टि वर्ष 2013
इस संशोध्न की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ एपफएडी/जी-128]
कुमार अनिल, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;खाद्य एवं कृषिद्ध
New Delhi, the 7th June, 2013
S.O. 1120.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Amendment, Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
2995 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935SCHEDULE
Sl. No. & Year of the Indian No. & year of the Date of which the No. standards Amendment amendment shall
have effect
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1. IS 13690 : 1992 Pasteurized Amendment No. 1 31 March, 2013 Butter-Specification Year 2013
Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices:New Delhi, Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Kochi.
[Ref. FAD/G-128]
KUMAR ANIL, Scientist 'F' and Head (Food and Agriculture)
नई दिल्ली, 7 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1121.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :—
अनुसूची
क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ;कोंद्ध की संख्या नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित स्थापित तिथि संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि
कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध
1. आई एस 629ः2013 साईकिल-हब असैम्बलि- आई एस 12205ः1988 पफरवरी 2013 विशिष्टि ;तीसरा पुनरीक्षणद्ध का समामेलन
2. आई एस 4692ः2013 पोतनिर्माण विद्युत वेल्डिड — मार्च 2013 स्टड रहित एंकर जंजीरें तथा संयोजी सांकलें- विशिष्टि ;दूसरा पुनरीक्षणद्ध
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक, 9 बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ टी ई डी/जी-16]
पी. सी. जोशी, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;टी ई डीद्ध
New Delhi, the 7th June, 2013
S.O. 1121.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standard, particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :
2996 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)]SCHEDULE
Sl. No., Year & title of the Indian Standards No. & year of Indian Date No. Established Standards, if any, Superseded Established
by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1. IS 629:2013 Bicycle-Hub assembly Amalgamating IS February 2013 Specification (Second Revision) 12205:1988
2. IS 4692:2013 Shipbuilding—Electrically — March 2013 welded studless link anchor chains and connecting shackles—Specification (Second Revision)
Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices:New Delhi, Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. TED/G-16]
P. C. JOSHI, Scientist 'F' & Head (Transport Engg.)
नई दिल्ली, 7 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1122.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित किया जाता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे रद्द कर दिए गए हैं और वापस ले लिये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
क्रम रद्द किये गये मानक की संख्या और वर्ष भारत के राजपत्रा भाग II, खंड 3, टिप्पणी संख्या
उपखंड;iiद्ध में का.आ. संख्या और तिथि प्रकाशित
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध
1. आई एस 7915ः1976 एयरक्रापफट ग्राउंड इलैक्ट्रिकल — आई एस/आई एस ओ सप्लाई के संयोजनों की विमाऐं
13835 ;भाग 2द्धः2012 के द्वारा अतिक्रमण
2. आई एस 8422 ;भाग 9द्ध : 1986 आई सी इंजनों के — आई एस/आई एस ओ 6621-1ः2007 के द्वारा अतिक्रमण पिस्टॅन रगों की विशिष्टि : भाग 9 शब्दावली एवं परिभाषाऐं
[संदर्भ टी ई डी/जी-16]
पी. सी. जोशी, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;टी ई डीद्ध
New Delhi, the 7th June, 2013
S.O. 1122.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, it is, hereby notified that the Indian Standards, Particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule give hereafter, have been cancelled and stand withdrawn.
2997 [भाग II—खण्ड 3 (ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935SCHEDULE
Sl. No. & Year of the Indian Standards S.O. No. & Date publsihed Remarks No. Cancelled
in the Gazette of India, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section(ii)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1. IS 7915:1976 Dimensions for connections — Superseded by IS/ISO for aircraft ground electrical supplies
13835(Part 2):2012 2. IS 8422(Part 9): 1986 Specification for piston — Superseded by IS/ISO rings for IC Engines: Part 9 Terms and definitions
6621-1:2007
[Ref. TED/G-16]
P. C. JOSHI, Scientist 'F' & Head (Transport Engg.)
नई दिल्ली, 10 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1123.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक;कोंद्ध में संशोध्न किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
क्रम संशोध्ति भारतीय मानक की संख्या संशोध्न की संख्या संशोध्न लागू होने संख्या और वर्ष और तिथि की तिथि
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध
1. आई एस 12235 ;भाग 4द्धः 2004 संशोध्न संख्या 1 जून, 2013 30 जून, 2013
इस संशोध्न की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक, 9 बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ सीईडी/राजपत्रा]
सी. आर. राजेन्द्रा, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;सिविल इंजीनियरीद्ध
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1123.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. and year of the Indian No. and year of the Date from which the No. Standards
amendment amendment shall
have effect (1) (2)
(3)
(4) 1. IS 12235 (Part 4): 2004 Amendment No. 1, June 2013 30-06-20132998 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3 (ii)] Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices:New Delhi, Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. CED/Gazette]
C. R. RAJENDRA, Scientist 'F' and Head (Civil Engg.)
नई दिल्ली, 10 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1124.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ;1द्ध के खंड ;खद्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अध्सिूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक;कोंद्ध में संशोध्न किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
क्रम संशोध्ति भारतीय मानक की संख्या संशोध्न की संख्या संशोध्न लागू होने संख्या और वर्ष और तिथि की तिथि
;1द्ध ;2द्ध
;3द्ध
;4द्ध
1. आई एस 15778ः2007 संशोध्न संख्या 2, मई, 2013 17 मई, 2013 इस संशोध्न की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक, 9 बहादुर शाह जपफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध् हैं ।
[संदर्भ सीईडी/राजपत्रा]
सी. आर. राजेन्द्रा, वैज्ञानिक 'एपफ' एवं प्रमुख ;सिविल इंजीनियरीद्ध
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1124.—In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl. No. and year of the Indian No. and year of the Date from which the No. Standards
amendment amendment shall
have effect (1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1. IS 15778:2007 Amendment No. 2, May 2013 17-05-2013 Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref. CED/Gazette]
C. R. RAJENDRA, Scientist 'F' and Head (Civil Engg.)2999 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935
नई दिल्ली, 12 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1125.—भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ;प्रमाणनद्ध विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 6 के उप-विनियम ;3द्ध के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक
ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए उत्पादों की मुहरांकन शुल्क अध्सिूचित करता है :
अनुसूची
भारतीय भाग अनु. वर्ष उत्पाद इकाई न्यूनतम मुहरांकन इकाई दर स्लैब में शेष प्रचालन
मानक बड़े पैमाने छोटे पैमाने स्लैब इकाईयां तिथि
संख्या पर पर ;रु.द्ध
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1319 - - 1983 खाद्य टेपियोका एक टन रु. 34000 रु. 29000 रु. 24 सभी - 12-2-2013
स्टार्च
3899 - - 1981 जिनेब घुलनशील एक टन रु. 34000 रु. 29000 रु. 24 सभी - 12-2-2013
पाउडर
5346 - - 1994 संश्लिष्ट खाद्य रंग एक किग्रा. रु. 34000 रु. 29000 रु. 0.26 सभी - 12-2-2013
निमितियां और मिश्रण ;पाउडर
के लिएद्ध
5346 - - 1994 संश्लिष्ट खाद्य रंग एक लिटर रु. 34000 रु. 29000 रु. 0.45 सभी - 12-2-2013
निमितियां और मिश्रण ;लिक्विड
के लिएद्ध
7180 - - 1973 डिस्पोजेबल आर्टीपिफ- 1000 नग रु. 39000 रु. 34000 रु. 1.50 सभी - 12-2-2013
शियल इन्सेमिनेशन
ग्लब्स
15298 4 - 2010 निजी सुरक्षा उपस्कर एक जोड़ा रु. 72000 रु. 61000 रु. 1.40 सभी - 12-2-2013
भाग 4 व्यवसाय में पहनने वाले पुफटवियर
[सं. सीएमडी/13ः10]
पी. के. गम्भीर, वैज्ञानिक 'जी' एवं प्रधन ;प्रमाणनद्ध
New Delhi, the 12th June, 2013
S.O. 1125.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (3) of regulation 6 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the Marking fee for the products givin in the schedule :
IS Part Sec. Year Product Unit Minimum Marking Fee Unit Unit in Remai- Effective No.
Large Scale Small Scale Rate Slab-1 ning Date
Slab-1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1319 - - 1983 Edible Tapioca One Tonne Rs. 34000 Rs. 29000 Rs. 24 All - 12-2-2013 Starch
3899 - - 1981 Zinab Water One Time Rs. 34000 Rs. 29000 Rs. 24 All - 12-2-2013 Dispersible Powder
5346 - - 1994 Synthetic One Kg. Rs. 34000 Rs. 29000 Rs. 0.26 All - 12-2-2013 Food Colour (for Preparation Powder) and Mixtures
5346 - - 1994 Synthetic One litre Rs. 34000 Rs. 29000 Rs. 0.45 All - 12-2-2013 Food Colour- (for Preparation Liquid) and Mixtures3000 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
7180 - - 1973 Disposable 1000 Pieces Rs. 39000 Rs. 34000 Rs. 1.50 All - 12-2-2013
Artificial Insemination Gloves
15298 4 - 2010 Personal One Pair Rs. 72000 Rs. 61000 Rs. 1.40 All - 12-2-2013
Protective Equipment Part 4, Occupa- tional Footwear
[No. CMD/13:10]
P. K. GAMBHIR, Scientist 'G' & Chief (Certification)
3. पूर्वोक्त सदस्यों की पदावध् िउनकी नियुक्ति की तारीख से
कृषि मंत्राालय
तीन वर्ष की अवध् िके लिए होगी ।
;कृषि और सहकारिता विभागद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 10 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1126.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, पौध किस्म और कृषक अध्किार संरक्षण अध्निियम, 2001 ;2001 का 53द्ध की धरा 3 की उप-धरा ;1द्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए का.आ. 1589;अद्ध, तारीख 11 नवम्बर, 2005 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्रा, असाधारण, भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड ;iiद्ध में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कृषि मंत्राालय ;कृषि और सहकारिता विभागद्ध की अधिसूचना में निम्नलिखित और संशाोध्न करती है, अर्थात् :—
2. उक्त अध्सिूचना में मद (ix), (x), (xi) (xii), और मद (xiv) और उससे संबंध्ति प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित मदें और प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी, अर्थात् :-
[पफा. सं. 2-3/2009-एस.डी. V]
राम वुफमार, अवर सचिव
टिप्पण ः—मूल अध्सिूचना सं. का.आ. 1589;अद्ध, तारीख 11 नवम्बर, 2005 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्रा, असाधरण, भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड ;iiद्ध तारीख 11 नवम्बर, 2005 में प्रकाशित किया गया था और पश्चातवर्ती संशोधन सं. का.आ. 1883;अद्ध, तारीख 1 नवम्बर, 2006, सं. का.आ. 1316;अद्ध, तारीख 11 मई, 2009, सं. का.आ. 3064;अद्ध, तारीख 30 नवम्बर, 2009, सं. का.आ. 195;अद्ध, तारीख 31 जनवरी, 2011 और सं. का.आ. 1726;अद्ध, तारीख 31 जुलाई, 2012 द्वारा किए गए ।
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE
फ्(ix) राष्ट्रीय या राज्य स्तरीय कृषक संगठन से एक प्रतिनिध्ि श्री पी. चेंगल रेड्डी, भारत कृषक सहयोजन परिसंघ, हैदराबाद -सदस्यऋ
(Department of Agriculture and Co-operation)
(x) जनजातीय संगठन के एक प्रतिनिध्-िश्री मायाराम नेताम, सेवानिवृृत्त कार्यक्रम अध्किारी, आकाशवाणी और दूरदर्शन मार्पफत वृंृदावन कालोनी, मकान नं. 1/21 जगदलपुर बस्तर, छत्तीसगढ़ -सदस्यऋ
(xi) बीज उद्योग से एक प्रतिनिध्-िडा. ऊषा बरवाले, महाराष्ट्र संकर बीज वंफपनी लिमिटेड, महाराष्ट्र -सदस्यऋ
(xii) कृषि विश्वविद्यालय से एक प्रतिनिध्-िडा. बी. एस. ढिल्लो, वुफलपति, पंजाब कृषि विश्वविद्यालय -सदस्यऋ
(xiv) राज्य सरकारों के दो प्रतिनिध्-ि(i) प्रधन सचिव ;कृषिद्ध, महाराष्ट्र सरकार (ii) प्रधन सचिव ;कृषिद्ध, उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार -सदस्यय् ।
New Delhi, the 10th June, 2013
S.O. 1126.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (53 of 2001), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Agriculture (Department of Agriculture and Co-operation) published in the Gazette of India, "Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide S.O.1589 (E), dated the 11th November, 2005, namely :—
2. In the said notification, for items, (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiv) and the entries relating thereto, following items and entries shall be substituted, namely :—
3001 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935"(ix) One representative from a National or State level Farmers' organization- Shri. P. Chengal Reddy, Federation of Farmers Association India, Hyderabad —Member;
(x) One representative from a Tribal Organisation- Shri. Mayaram Nettam, Retired Program Officer, AIR and Doordarshan C/o Vrindavan Colony, House No. 1/21, Jagadalpur, Bastar, Chattisgarh —Member;
(xi) One representative from Seed Industry: Dr. Usha Barwale, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company Limited, Maharashtra —Member;
(xii) One representative from Agricultural University- Dr. B. S. Dhillon, Vice Chancellor, Punjab Agriculture University —Member;
(xiv) Two representatives of State Governments- (i) Principal Secretary (Agriculture), Government of Maharashtra.(ii) Principal Secretary (Agriculture), Government of Uttar Pradesh —Members".
3. The terms of office of the aforesaid Member shall be for a period of three years from the date of their appointment.
;लगभगद्ध या 519.19 एकड़ ;लगभगद्ध में सभी अध्किार और 19.00 हेक्टर ;लगभगद्ध या 46.93 एकड़ ;लगभगद्ध में खनन अधिकार] में उन पर कार्य करने और उन्हें ले जाने कि लिए अधिकार, उक्त अध्निियम की धरा 10 की उप-धरा ;1द्ध के अधीन, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर, आत्यंतिक रूप से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित हो गए हैऋ
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का समाधन हो गया है कि ईस्टर्न कोलपफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, संकतोड़िया, डाकघर दिशेरगढ़, जिला बर्द्ववान-713333, पश्चिम बंगाल ;जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् सरकारी कंपनी कहा गया हैद्ध, ऐसे निबंध्नों और शर्तों का जिन्हें केन्द्रीय सरकार इस निमित्त अध्रिोपित करना उचित समझे, अनुपालन करने के लिए रजामंद है ।
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अध्निियम, 1957 की धरा 11 की उप-धरा ;1द्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि [210.20 हेक्टर ;लगभगद्ध या 519.19 एकड़ ;लगभगद्ध में सभी अध्किार और 19.00 हेक्टर ;लगभगद्ध या 46.93 एकड़ ;लगभगद्ध में खनन अधिकार] में के पूर्वोक्त अध्किार केन्द्रीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने के बजाए, तारीख 25 पफरवरी, 2013 से निम्नलिखित निबंध्नों और शर्तों के अध्ीन रहते हुए, सरकारी कंपनी में निहित होंगे, अर्थात् :-
[F. No. 2-3/2009-SD. V]
RAM KUMAR, Under Secy.
Note : —The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii) dated the 11th November, 2005, vide No. S.O. 1589 (E), dated the 11th November, 2005 and subsequently amended vide No. S.O. 1883 (E), dated the 1st November, 2006, No. S.O. 1316 (E), dated the 11th May, 2009, No. S.O. 3064 (E), dated the 30th November, 2009, No. S.O. 195 (E), the 31st January, 2011 and No. S.O. 1726 (E), dated the 31st July, 2012.
;1द्ध सरकारी कंपनी, उक्त अध्निियम के उपबंधें के अध्ीन यथा अवधरित प्रतिकर, ब्याज, नुकसानियों और वैसी ही मदों की बाबत किए गए संदायों की केन्द्रीय सरकार को प्रतिपूत करेगीऋ
कोयला मंत्राालय
;2द्ध सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा शर्त ;1द्ध के अध्ीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को संदेय रकमों का अवधरण करने के प्रयोजनों के लिए उक्त अध्सिूचना की धरा 14 के अध्ीन एक अध्किरण का गठन किया जाएगा और ऐसे किसी अध्किरण और ऐसे अध्किरण की सहायता करने के लिए नियुक्त व्यक्तियों के संबंध् में उपगत सभी व्यय, सरकारी कंपनी वहन किए जाएंगे और इसी प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के अध्किारों के लिए या उनके संबंध् में अपील आदि सभी विध्कि कार्यवाहियों की बाबत उपगत, सभी व्यय भी, सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगेऋ
आदेश
नई दिल्ली, 11 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1127.—कोयला धरक क्षेत्रा ;अर्जन और विकासद्ध अधिनियम, 1957 ;1957 की 20द्ध ;जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्् उक्त अध्निियम कहा गया हैद्ध की धरा 9 की उप-धरा ;1द्ध के अध्ीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्राालय की अध्सिूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 456;अद्ध, तारीख 22 पफरवरी, 2013 जो भारत के राजपत्रा, भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड ;iiद्ध, तारीख 25 पफरवरी, 2013 में प्रकाशित होने पर उक्त अध्सिूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वणत भूमि ;जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त भूमि कहा गया हैद्ध [210.20 हेक्टर ;3द्ध सरकारी कंपनी, केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधरियों की, ऐसे किसी अन्य व्यय के संबंध् में क्षतिपूत करेगी, इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के पूर्वोक्त अध्किारों के बारे में, केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों द्वारा तथा उनके विरु( किन्हीं कार्यवाहियों के संबंध् में आवश्यक होऋ
;4द्ध सरकारी कंपनी को, केन्द्रीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के बिना, उक्त भूमि और भूमि में या उसके ऊपर इस प्रकार निहित अध्किार को किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नहीं होगीऋ और3002 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] ;5द्ध सरकारी कंपनी, ऐसे निदेशों और शर्तों का, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा, जब कभी आवश्यक हो, उक्त भूमि के विशिष्ट क्षेत्राों के लिए दिए जाएं या अध्रिोपित किए जाएं, पालन करेगी ।
[पफा. सं. 43015/28/2009-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-I]
वी. एस. राणा, अवर सचिव shall, with effect from the 25th February, 2013, instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government, vest in the Government company, subject to the following terms and conditions, namely :—
(1) the Government company shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of compensation, interest, damages and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act;
MINISTRY OF COAL
ORDER
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2013
S.O. 1127.—Whereas on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal, number S.O. 456(E), dated the 22nd February, 2013 in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II Section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 25th February, 2013, issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the land [all rights in 210.20 hectares (approximately) or 519.19 acres (approximately) and mining rights in 19.00 hectares (approximately) or 46.93 acres (approximately)] described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said land) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances, under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the said Act;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the Eastern Coalfields Limited, At-Sanctoria, Post Office Disergarh, District Burdwan-713333, West Bengal (hereinafter referred to as the Government company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs, that the said land [all rights in 210.20 hectares (approximately) or 519.19 acres (approximately) and mining rights in 19.00 hectares (approximately) or 46.93 acres (approximately)] so vested (2) a Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act for the purpose of determining the amounts payable to the Central Government by the Government company under condition (1), and all expenditure incurred in connection with any such Tribunal and persons appointed to assist the said Tribunal shall be borne by the Government company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like appeals, etc., for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said land, so vested, shall also be borne by the Government company;
(3) the Government company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials, regarding the rights in or over the said land so vested;
(4) the Government company shall have no power to transfer the said land and the rights in or over the said land so vested, to any other person without the prior approval of the Central Government; and
(5) the Government company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the Central Government for particular areas of the said land, as and when necessary.
[F. No. 43015/28/2009-PRIW-I]
V. S. RANA, Under Secy.
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्राालय
नई दिल्ली, 4 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1128.—केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य में पारादीप ;उड़ीसाद्ध से रायपुर ;छत्तीसगढ़द्ध एवं राँची ;झारखण्डद्ध तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादाें के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिएऋ
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब(
अनुसूची मे वर्णित है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जन किया जाएऋ
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ;भूमि मे उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जनद्ध अध्निियम,1962 ;1962 का 50द्ध की धरा 3 की उप-धरा ;1द्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती हैऋ3003 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब( है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अध्सिूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्रा की प्रतियांँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध् करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अध्किार के संबध्ं में श्री दिलीप कुमार अग्रवाल, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, पारादीप-सम्बलपुर-रायपुर-राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना, ए-13, सेक्टर 1, अवंति विहार, रायपुर -492006 ;छत्तीसगढ़द्ध को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगाऋ
अनुसूची
तहसील : पिथौरा
जिला : महासमुंद
राज्य : छत्तीसगढ़
क्र. सं. गांव का नाम खसरा सं.
क्षेत्रापफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
1 2 3 4 5 6
1. रेमडा 16/1084 00 06 84
2.
तिलंजनपुर 311/3 00 14 47
3. सावित्राीपुर 309/884 00 18 87 4. अठारागुडी 454 00 02 40 5. सरकडा 612 00 06 15
[पफा. सं. आर-25011/21/2010-ओ.आर-I]
पवन वुफमार, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2013
S.O. 1128.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur (Chhattisgarh) & Ranchi (Jharkhand), a "Pipeline" should be laid in State of Chhattisgarh by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Dilip Kumar Agrawal, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip – Sambalpur – Raipur – Ranchi Pipeline Project, A-13, Sector -1, Avanti Vihar, Raipur -492006, Chhattisgarh.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Pithora District : Mahasamund State : Chhattisgarh
Sl. No Name of the Village Khasara No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2
3 4 5 6
1. Remda 16/1084 00 06 84 2. Tilanjanpur 311/3 00 14 47 3. Sawitripur 309/884 00 18 87 4. Atharagudi 454 00 02 40 5. Sankara 612 00 06 15
[F. No. R-25011/21/2010-OR-1]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
3004 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]नई दिल्ली, 4 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1129.—केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य में पारादीप ;उड़ीसाद्ध से रायपुर ;छत्तीसगढ़द्ध एवं राँची ;झारखण्डद्ध तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादाें के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब( अनुसूची मे वर्णित है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जन किया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ;भूमि मे उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जनद्ध अध्निियम,1962 ;1962 का 50द्ध की धरा 3 की उपधरा ;1द्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितब( है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अध्सिूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्रा की प्रतियांँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध् करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अध्किार के संबध्ं में श्री दिलीप कुमार अग्रवाल, सक्षम प्राध्किारी, पारादीप-सम्बलपुर-रायपुर-राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना, ए-13, सेक्टर 1, अवंति विहार, रायपुर -492006 ;छत्तीसगढ़द्ध को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
तहसील : सरायपाली
जिला : महासमुंद
राज्य : छत्तीसगढ
क्रम. सं. गांव का नाम खसरा सं. क्षेत्रापफल
हेक्टयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध
1 मोखापुटका 2098 00 13 60
[पफा. सं. आर-25011/20/2010-ओ आर-I]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2013
S.O. 1129.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur (Chhattisgarh)& Ranchi (Jharkhand), a "Pipeline" should be laid in State of Chhattisgarh by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty–one days from the date on which the copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the General Public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Dilip Kumar Agrawal, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip – Sambalpur – Raipur – Ranchi Pipeline Project, A-13, Sector -1, Avanti Vihar, Raipur -492006, Chhattisgarh.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Saraipali District : Mahasamund State : Chhattisgarh
Sl. No Name of the Village Khasara No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2
3 4 5 6
1 Mokhaputka 2098 00 13 60
[F. No. R-25011/20/2010-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
3005 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935नई दिल्ली, 4 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1130.—केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य में पारादीप ;उड़ीसाद्ध से रायपुर ;छत्तीसगढ़द्ध एवं राँची ;झारखण्डद्ध तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादाें के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाब( अनुसूची मे वर्णित है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जन किया जाए ।
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ;भूमि मे उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जनद्ध अध्निियम,1962 ;1962 का 50द्ध की धरा 3 की उपधरा ;1द्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वणत भूमि में हितब( है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अध्सिूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्रा की प्रतियांँ साधरण जनता को उपलब्ध् करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध् में श्री दिलीप कुमार अग्रवाल, सक्षम प्राध्किारी, पारादीप-सम्बलपुर-रायपुर-राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना, ए-13, सेक्टर 1, अवंति विहार, रायपुर -492006 ;छत्तीसगढ़द्ध को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
तहसील : बसना
जिला : महासमुंद
राज्य : छत्तीसगढ
क्रम. सं. गांव का नाम खसरा सं. क्षेत्रापफल
हेक्टयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
;1द्ध ;2द्ध ;3द्ध ;4द्ध ;5द्ध ;6द्ध
1 मेढ़ापाली 213 00 34 68
464 00 06 66
2 पिलवापाली 589 00 01 07
3 खोगसा 715/2 00 09 57
4 घुटी कोना 564/5 00 03 48
5 भवॅरचुवा ;टु.द्ध 46/3 00 04 13
6 बुन्देलाभांठा 536 00 02 73
7 गौरटेक 613/2 00 08 30
1712 00 00 91
1652 00 09 20
8 हबेकांटा 498/3 00 00 60
9 खटखटी 1 00 07 40
[पफा. सं. आर-25011/19/2010-ओ आर-I]
पवन कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 4th June, 2013
S.O. 1130.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur (Chhattisgarh)& Ranchi (Jharkhand), a "Pipeline" should be laid in State of Chhattisgarh by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
3006 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the General Public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Dilip Kumar Agrawal, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip – Sambalpur – Raipur – Ranchi Pipeline Project, A-13, Sector -1, Avanti Vihar, Raipur -492006, Chhattisgarh.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Basna District : Mahasamund State : Chhattisgarh
Sl. No Name of the Village Khasara No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Medhapali 213 00 34 68
464 00 06 66
2 Pilwapali 589 00 01 07
3 Khogsa 715/2 00 09 57
4 Ghutikona 564/5 00 03 48
5 Bhawarchuwa(Part) 46/3 00 04 13
6 Bundelabhantha 536 00 02 73
7 Gaurtak 613/2 00 08 30
1712 00 00 91
1652 00 09 20
8 Hawekanta 498/3 00 00 60
9 Khatkhati 1 00 07 40
[F. No. R-25011/19/2010-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 7 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1131.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ;भूमि में उपयोग के अध्किार का अर्जनद्ध अध्निियम, 1962 ;1962 का 50द्ध की धरा 2 के खंड ;कद्ध के अनुसरण में उक्त अध्निियम के अध्ीन तमिलनाडु राज्य और पुदुचेरी संघ शासित प्रदेश के भीतर गेल ;इण्डियाद्ध लिमिटेड की सभी पाइपलाईनों के लिये सक्षम अध्किारी के कार्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिये श्री एम. आर. वासुदेवन, डिप्टी कलेक्टर, तमिलनाडु सरकार, को दिनांक 4-5-2013 से प्राध्कृित करती है ।
[पफा. सं. एल-14014/10/13-जी.पी.]
एस. पी. अग्रवाल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 7th June, 2013
S.O. 1131.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), Central Government hereby authorized Shri M.R. Vasudevan, Deputy Collector, Government of Tamilnadu to perform the functions of Competent Authority for all pipelines of GAIL (India) Limited, under the said Act, within the territory of Tamilnadu State & Union Territory of Puducherry w.e.f. 4-5-2013.
[F. No. L-14014/10/13-G.P.]
S. P. AGARWAL, Under Secy.
3007 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्राालय
;वाणिज्य विभागद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 5 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1132.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, निर्यात ;क्वालिटी नियंत्राण और निरीक्षणद्ध नियम, 1964 के नियम 12 के उप-नियम ;2द्ध के साथ पठित, निर्यात ;क्वालिटी नियंत्राण और निरीक्षणद्ध अध्निियम, 1963 ;1963 का 22द्ध की धरा 7 की उप-धरा ;1द्ध द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इन्सपेक्टोरेट ग्रिफ्रथ इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. 14/253;8द्ध, दूसरा तल, पेरयिरा चेम्बर्स, पी जोस वाज रोड़, सीटी एरिया, वास्को-दा-गामा, गोवा- 403 802 भारत में इस अध्सिूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवध् िके लिए वाण्जिय मंत्राालय की अध्सिूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर, 1965 से उपाब( अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट खनिजों और अयस्कों समूह - I अर्थात् लौह अयस्क का निम्नलिखित शर्तो के अध्ीन रहते हुए, उक्त खनिजों और अयस्कों का गोवा में, निर्यात से पूर्व निरिक्षण करने के लिए एक अभिकरण के रूप में मान्यता प्रदान करती है, अर्थात् :—
;iद्ध मैसर्स इन्सपेक्टोरेट ग्रिफ्रथ इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. 14/253;8द्ध, दूसरा तल, पेरयिरा चेम्बर्स, पी जोस वाज रोड़, सीटी एरिया, वास्को-दा-गामा, गोवा 403 802 खनिज और अयस्क, समूह-I का निर्यात ;निरीक्षणद्ध नियम, 1965 के नियम 4 के अध्ीन निरीक्षण करने के लिए उनके द्वारा अपनाई गई निरीक्षण की प(ति की जांच करने के लिए इस निमित्त निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा नामनिदष्ट अध्किारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधएं देगीऋ
;iiद्ध मैसर्स इन्सपेक्टोरेट ग्रिफ्रथ इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. 14/253;8द्ध, दूसरा तल, पेरयिरा चेम्बर्स, पी जोस वाज रोड़, सीटी एरिया, वास्को-दा-गामा, गोवा-403 802 इस अध्सिूचना के अध्ीन अपने कृत्यों के पालन में निदेशक ;खनिज और क्वालिटी नियंत्राणद्ध द्वारा समय-समय पर लिखित रुप में दिए गए निदेशों से आब( होंगे ।
[पफा. सं. 4/1/2013-निर्यात निरीक्षण]
ए. वेफ. त्रिापाठी, संयुक्त सचिव
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce)
New Delhi, the 5th June, 2013
S.O. 1132.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963), read with sub-rule (2) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules, 1964, the Central Government hereby recognises M/s Inspectorate Griffith India Pvt. Ltd., 14/253(8), 2nd Floor, Pereira Chambers, Pe Jose Vaz Road, City Area, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa- 403 802, India as an Agency for a period of three years from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette, for the inspection of Minerals and Ores Group-I, namely, Iron Ore, specified in the Schedule annexed to the Ministry of Commerce notification number S.O. 3975, dated the 20th December 1965, prior to export of said minerals and ores at Goa, subject to the following conditions, namely: —
(i) M/s Inspectorate Griffith India Pvt. Ltd., 14/253(8),2nd Floor, Pereira Chambers, Pe Jose Vaz Road, City Area, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa- 403 802, shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in carrying out the inspection under rule 4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores - Group I (Inspection) Rules, 1965; and
(ii) M/s Inspectorate Griffith India Pvt. Ltd., 14/253(8),2nd Floor, Pereira Chambers, Pe Jose Vaz Road, City Area, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa- 403 802, in the performance of its function under this notification shall be bound by such directions as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control) may give in writing, from time to time.
[F. No. 4/1/13-Export Inspection]
A. K. TRIPATHY, Jt. Secy.
3008 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालयश्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालयश्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालयश्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालयश्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 22 मई, 2013
का.आ. 1133.का.आ. 1133.का.आ. 1133.का.आ. 1133.का.आ. 1133. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स सी पी
डब्ल्यू डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं.
. 1, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
7/2008) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22.5.2013
को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/191/2005-आईआर(सीएम- II)]
बी. एम. पटनायक, डेस्क अधिकारी
2. Shri Dwarka Prasad, who was working as operator with the management, had superannuated on November 1993. He was not given wages of highly skilled artisan, viz. Operator, by the management. As such, he got less gratuity and pensionary benefits. His claim for leave encashment was also declined. Aggrieved by that act of the management, he raised an industrial dispute. Since his claim was contested by the management, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of the failure report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, New Delhi, vide order No. L/42012/191/2005-IR(CM-II), New Delhi dated 24.03.2008 with following terms:
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2013
S.O. 1133.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 7/2008) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Electrical Division-12, CPWD, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22.05.2013.
[No. L-42012/191/2005-IR (CM-II)] B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer "Whether the demand of all India CPWD (MRM) Kramchari Sangathan for revision of pension, gratuity and leave encashment of Shri Dwarka Prasad is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled to?
ANNEXURE
3. Claim statement was filed by Shri Dwarka Prasad, wherein he pleaded that on implementation of Arbitration Award, he was to be re-classified as highly skilled artisan and placed in scale of pay of Rs. 330-560 with effect from 01.03.1973 and Rs. 1200-2040 with effect from 01.01.1986, on completion of eight years of regular service. Management, failed to grant him pay in the aforesaid two scales of pay. He superannuated on 30.11.1993. According to him, an amount of Rs. 1,15,042.00 is due as arrears from the management, besides revision of his pension.
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA
COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI.
I.D. No. 7/2008
The General Secretary, All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, 4823, Balbir Nagar Extention, Gali No. 13, Shahadara, Delhi-110032.
.....Workman
Versus
The Executive Engineer (E), Electrical Division-12, CPWD, Kitab Mahal, B.K.S. Marg, New Delhi-110001 ....Management
AWARD
Arbitration Award for re-categorization and reclassification of workmen in Central Public Works Department (in short the management) was passed in the year 1988. It was implemented with effect from 01.01.1973 (notionally) and financial benefits were accorded with effect from 01.04.1981. On implementation of the Arbitration Award, post of Assistant Operator was merged with operator and they were entitled for grant of selection grade on completion of eight years of regular service.
4. Management demurred his claim projecting that vide its order dated 25.09.1998 in CWP No. 87/97 and 106/ 97, High Court of Delhi announced that after merger of various categories in terms of Arbitration Award, if a workman is to be upgraded to the next higher category in that stream, it would be an element of promotion and the workman had to undergo trade test, if so prescribed. It has been disputed that Shri Dwarka Prasad was reclassified highly skilled artisan from 01.01.1973 notionally and with effect from 01.04.1981 with financial benefits. Shri Dwarka Prasad was not entitled for automatic upgradation without qualifying the trade test. He never qualified trade test, hence was not entitled to receive wages in scale of Rs. 330-560 and Rs. 1200-2040 with effect from 01.01.1986. His claims for receipt of arrears of Rs. 115042 and revision of pension are not maintainable. Management projects that the claim, being devoid of merits, is liable to be dismissed.
5. Vide notification No. A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II, New Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of the post of the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New Delhi, was assigned to the undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus, this case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.
3009 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 19356. During the course of adjudication, Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, General Secretary of CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, made statement on oath to the effect that the management had made payment to the claimant towards selection grade from 01.04.1981, granted terminal benefits on revised salary, allowed leave encashment and revised his pension. He declared that all benefits relating to revision of pension, gratuity and leave encashment have been accorded by the management to the claimant. He announced that the dispute stood satisfied.
4823, Balbir Nagar Extention, Gali No. 13, Shahadara, Delhi-110032.
.....Workman
Versus
The Superintending Engineer (Elect), Coord. Circle, CPWD, East Block, R.K. Puram, New Delhi.
....Management
AWARD
7. As deposed by Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, authorised representative of the claimant, dispute between the claimant and the management has been satisfied, since all dues towards revision of pension, gratuity and leave encashment have been granted to the claimant. In view of these facts, it is announced that the dispute referred above for adjudication stood subsided. An award is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate Governemnt for publication.
Dated 18.04.2013 Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Arbitration Award for re-categorization and reclassification of workmen in Central Public Works Department (in short the management) was passed in the year 1988. It was implemented with effect from 01.01.1973 (notionally) and financial benefits were accorded with effect from 01.04.1981. On implementation of the Arbitration Award, post of Assistant Mechanic was merged with mechanic and they were entitled for grant of selection grade on completion of eight years of regular service.
नई दिल्ली, 22 मई, 2013
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1134 1134 1134 1134 1134.
. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स सी पी
डब्ल्यू डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
74/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22.5.2013
को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/244/2005-आईआर(सीएम- II)]
2. Shri Sajai Kumar joined the management as mechanic on 27.04.1985. His services were regularized on 24.08.1993. He was not given wages of highly skilled category by the management. Aggrieved by that act of the management, he raised an industrial dispute. Since his claim was contested by the management, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of the failure report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, New Delhi, vide order No. L/42012/244/2005-IR(CM-II), New Delhi dated 24.08.2006 with following terms:
बी. एम. पटनायक, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2013
S.O. 1134.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 74/2006) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management CPWD, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22.05.2013.
"Whether the demand of the union for regularization of Shri Sajai Kumar, Mechanic, as well as placing him in highly skilled category with effect from 27.04.1985 is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief is the workman entitled to?
[No. L-42012/244/2005-IR (CM-II)]
B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer
3. Claim statement was filed by Shri Sajai Kumar, wherein he pleaded that on implementation of Arbitration Award, he was to be re-classified as highly skilled artisan and placed in scale of pay of Rs. 330-560 with effect from 24.08.1993, the date of his regularization. On completion of eight years of regular service, the management, failed to grant him pay in the scales of Rs. 1200-2040.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA
COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI.
I.D. No. 74/2006
The General Secretary, All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan,
4. Management demurred his claim projecting that vide its order dated 25.09.1998 in CWP No. 87/97 and 106/ 97, High Court of Delhi announced that after merger of various categories in terms of Arbitration Award, if a workman is to be upgraded to the next higher category in that stream, it would be an element of promotion and the workman had to undergo trade test, if so prescribed. It has been disputed that Shri Sajai Kumar was as Mechanic which comes under highly skilled category. It has been claimed that post of mechanic comes under skilled category.
3010 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX,
DELHI.
Shri Sajai Kumar was not entitled for automatic upgradation without qualifying the trade test. He never qualified trade test, hence was not entitled to receive wages in scale of Rs. 330-560 and Rs. 1200-2040 with effect from 01.01.1986. Management projects that the claim, being devoid of merits, is liable to be dismissed.
I.D. No. 73/2006
5. Vide notification No. A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II, New Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of the post of the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New Delhi, was assigned to the undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus, this case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.
6. During the course of adjudication, Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, General Secretary of CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, made statement on oath to the effect that the management had reckoned period of service of the claimant from 04.03.1985 to 23.08.1993 for the purpose of gratuity and pensionary benefits. He announced that in view of recognization of his services for the period referred above, the dispute stands satisfied.
The General Secretary, All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, 4823, Balbir Nagar Extention, Gali No. 13, Shahadara, Delhi-110032.
.....Workman
Versus
The Executive Engineer (E), Electrical Division-11, CPWD, IARI, Pusa, New Delhi-110012.
....Management
AWARD
7. As deposed by Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, authorised representative of the claimant, dispute between the claimant and the management has been satisfied since the management had reckoned period of service of the claimant from 4.3.1985 to 23.8.1993 for the purpose of gratuity and pensionary benefits. In view of these facts, it is announced that the dispute referred above for adjudication stood subsided. An award is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate Governemnt for publication.
Dated 18.04.2013 Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer A Khalasi joined as muster roll employee with Central Public Works Department (in short the management) on 03.07.1987. He was continuously engaged by the management for more than 240 days in every calender year. His services were regularized on 16.10.2003. He left aggrieved by the said act of the management, since he claimed regularization of his services from the very date he joined on muster roll. His demand in that regard was not conceded to. He approached the all India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan (in short the Sangathan) for redressal of his grievances. The Sangathan espoused his cause and raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since claim was contested, conciliation proceedings ended into a failure. On consideration of failure report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New Delhi for adjudication vide order No. L-42012/245/2005-IR(CM-II), New Delhi dated 24.08.2006, with following terms:
नई दिल्ली, 22 मई, 2013
का.आ. 1135.का.आ. 1135.का.आ. 1135.का.आ. 1135.का.आ. 1135. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स सी पी
डब्ल्यू डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
73/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22.5.2013
को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/245/2005-आईआर(सीएम- II)]
बी. एम. पटनायक, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2013 S.O. 1135.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 73/2006) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Public Works Department, CPWD, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22.05.2013.
[No. L-42012/245/2005-IR (CM-II)] B. M. PATNAIK, Desk Officer "Whether demand of the union for regularization of services of Shri Mohan Lal, Khalasi with effect from 03.07.1987 is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
2. Claim statement was filed by the Khalasi, namely, Shri Mohan Lal, pleading therein that he was engaged by the management on muster roll since 03.07.1987. He rendered continuous service for more than 240 days in every calender year. The Apex Court in Surender Singh (2007 (115) FLR 1003) had commanded the management to regularize services of all daily rated employees from the date of their initial appointment. Though he rendered continuous service of more than 240 days, but his services were not regularized from initial date of his engagement. The management regularized his services with effect from 16.10.2003, which3011 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 act is illegal. He claims regularization of his services with effect from 03.07.1987 with all consequential benefits.
New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2013
S.O. 1136.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 73/1993 of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06.05.2013.
[No. L-20012/86/1992-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL (NO. 1) DHANBAD
3. Claim was demurred by the management pleading that the claimant approached the adjudicatory machinery under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (in short the Act) without exhausting all available opportunities. His claim, being premature is liable to be dismissed. The management projects that 8982 posts were created by Government of India in September 1992 for regularization of all eligible workman who were engage prior to imposition of ban, i.e. 19.11.1985. All workers, who were eligible, were regularized from prospective date(s) and not from the date of their initial engagement. Case of the claimant is not covered by precedent in Sureder Singh case (supra). When vacancy was available, his services were regularized. Claim projected, is devoid of merits, hence needs dismissal, pleads the management.
Lok Adalat
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D. ACT, 1947.
Ref. No. 73 of 1993
4. Vide notification No. A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II, New Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of the post of the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New Delhi, was assigned to the undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus, this case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.
Employers in relation to the management of Kapasara Area of M/s E.C.L.
and
Their workmen
Present: Shri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
Presiding Officer
Appearances:
5. During the course of adjudication, Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, General Secretary of the Sangathan and aurhorized representative of the claimant made a statement on oath to the effect that the management had reckoned period of service of the claimant from 03.07.1987 to 30.11.1993 for the purpose of gratuity and pensionery benefits. He announced that in view of recognition of his services for the period above, claimant feels satisfied and does not want to agitate his grievance. According to him, the dispute stood resolved.
For the Employers : None
For the workman : None
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated: 19.04.2013
AWARD
6. As deposed by Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, authorised representative of the claimant, dispute between the management and the claimant has been satisfied, since management had reckoned period of his service from 03.07.1987 to 30.11.1993 for the purpose of gratuity and pensionery benefit. The claimant feels satisfied and does not want adjudication of the dispute any further. Thus, it is evident that the dispute stood satisfied. An award is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate Governemnt for publication.
DATED 18.04.2013 Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer By Order No. L-20012/86/92-IR-(C-I), dt. 22.02.1993, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2013
"Whether the demand of Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union for regularization of S/Shri Dasu Roy and 6 ors. as per annexure for regularization as water carrier in Kapasara Colliery of M/s E.C.L. is justified? If yes, to what relief the workman are entitled to?"
ANNEXURE
1. Dashu Roy 2. Kamal Roy 3. Guhi Ram Roy
4. Ramasish Yadav 5. Jaudin Yadav 6. Kali ch. Pasndit
7. Prabhu Roy.
का.आ. 1136.का.आ. 1136.का.आ. 1136.का.आ. 1136.का.आ. 1136. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ई सी एल
के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध्
ा में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम
न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 73/1993) को प्रकाशित
करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06.05.2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/86/1992-आईआर(सी- I)]
After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. They submitted Written statement and rejoinder. The case fixed for evidence. Ld. Counsel of the workman submitted
एम. के सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
3012 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]that the workman is not interested to contest the case. It is felt that there is not dispute between the parties. Hence a "No Dispute" award is passed.
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
This is my award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2013
"Whether the action of the management of Bera Colliery of M/s B.C.C.L. in not correcting the date of Birth of Shri Khublal Mahato, Driver as 01.02.1958 instead of 11.07.1948 is justified? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled?"
का.आ. 1137का.आ. 1137का.आ. 1137का.आ. 1137का.आ. 1137 .
. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी सी सी
एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच,
अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
30/2009) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
29.04.2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
2. The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 21.05.2009. Both parties are noticed. The Union files their written statement on 06.07.2009. After that rejoinder and document received. The claim of the workman is that his date of birth is 1958, but the management holding the date of birth of the workman is 1948, Superannuated him in the year 2008, Hence the reference.
. एल-20012/13/2009-आईआर(सीएम-I)]
[सं.
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2013
S.O. 1137.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/ 2009) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29.04.2013.
[No. L-20012/13/2009-IR (CM-I)] M. K. SINGH, Section Officer 3. The case of the workman is, he was working in colliery from the year 1973, subsequently management stopped their engagement and after challenge, management engaged the workman in duty in the year 1982. From the side of the workman his identity card has been filed. His date of birth shown therein as 11.7.1948 and his date of engagement shown as March, 75 as well as 3.3.1982.
4. From the record, it appears that the workman called for his service of 1973 particulars from the management alongwith copy of form "B" register from which the correct date of birth would have been revealed.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL (NO. 1) DHANBAD
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D. ACT, 1947.
5. It is submitted by the management that, the form "B" register of 1982 and from I.D. Card (W-1) the date of birth of the workman is 1948. The MW-1 unable to say regarding the old record. Though it has been suggested that the date of birth of the workman from the form "B" register was tempered, on close scrutiny, no such tampering pointed out.
Ref. No. 30 of 2009
Employers in relation to the management of Bera Colliery of M/s B.C.C.L.
and
Their workmen
Present: Shri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman : Shri D. Mukherjee, Rep.
State : Jharkhand Industry: Coal.
Dated: 03.04.2013 6. Another factor is, if the date of birth of the workman will be taken as 1958 as claimed by the workman, at the time of his engagement in the year 1973 he would be 15 years old. A company cannot engage a minor in his organisation as claimed. More over from the side of workman, not a scrap of paper has been filed to proove the workman's date of birth is 1958 instead of 1948. This being the situation the date of birth mentioned in the both form "B" register and identity card (W-1) is same, it is accepted and the workman has been rightly superannuated in time.
AWARD
By Order No. L-20012/13/2009-IR-(CM-I), dated 15.05.2009, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of 7. Considering the facts and circumstances, I hold that the action of the management of Bera Colliery of M/s B.C.C.L. is not correction the date of birth of Shri Khublal Mahato, Driver as 01.02.1958 instead of 11.07.1948 is justified. And the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.
This is my Award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer3013 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2013
SCHEDULE
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1138 1138 1138 1138 1138.
. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947
(1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय
सरकार मैसर्स बी सी सी एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध
नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट
औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
16/2009) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05/04/2013
को प्राप्त हुआ था।
"Whether the action of the Management of Angarpathra Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not Providing dependent employment to Sri Bajrang Bhuia S/o Late Ram Chandra Bhuia. Fitter Helper, under the provisions of NCWA is justified and legal? (ii) To what relief is the son of Late Ram Chandra Bhuia entitled?"
[सं. एल-20012/09/2009-आईआर (सीएम- I)]
एम के सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2013
S.O. 1138.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government 05/04/2013.
2. The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 13.04.2009. Both parties are noticed. The Union files their written statement on 19.05.2009. After that rejoinder and document received. The short question involved in the reference, whether the dependent of the workman is entitled to be re-employed in place of the workman or not. The claim of the workman's son is that his father late Ram Chandra Bhuia died on 30.06.1995.
[No. L-20012/09/2009-IR(CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
3. As per the certificate of BCCL Medical record and Ram Chandra Bhuia has been given notice to retire from his job on 01.07.1995 i.e. one day after his death. Therefore the workman died while on service and as such as per the Rules of the BCCL management his dependent Bajrang Bhuia is to be employed on compassionate ground. In this case BCCL has also not contested the claim of the workman for which the management has not adduced any evidence, this proves that the management is not contesting the case.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
(NO.1), DHANBAD
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D. ACT, 1947
Ref. No. 16 of 2009
Employers in relation to the management of Angarpathra Colliery of M/s. B. C.C.L.
and
Their workmen
Present: Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
Presiding Officer
4. As per Management's written statement, the death certificate of the workman issued by the then medical officer of Angarpathra colliery of M/s. BCCL. As per the death certificate, the workman expired on 30.06.95 at 6.00 AM. Therefore the 30.06.95 was the last working day of deceased workman. This shows that the workman is in service on 30.06.95. But the workman was to retire on 01.07.1995, as per managements record filed by the workman.
4. Since the workman died during his service period, his son Bajrang is entitled to get a job on compassionate ground as per settled rule of BCCL.
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the Workman : Sri Sachidanand Singh, Rep.
State: Jharkhand.
Industry: Coal.
Dated. 22-03-2013 5. Considering the facts and circumstance, I hold the action of the management of Angarpathra colliery of M/s. BCCL in not providing dependent employment to Shri Bajrang Bhuia S/o Late Ram Chandra Bhuia under the provision of NCWA is not justified and legal, the reference answered in favour of the workman and his son Sri Bajrang Bhuia is entitled to get job on compassionate ground.
This is my award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 23 मई, 2013
By Order No.L-20012/09/2009-IR (CM-I), dated 30.03.2009, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following का.आ. 1139.का.आ. 1139.का.आ. 1139.का.आ. 1139.का.आ. 1139. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी सी सी एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार3014 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] form "B" Register, C.M.P.F records etc. is legal & justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के
पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 58/1998) को प्रकाशित करती है,
ज ा े क े न् द ्र ी य स र क ा र क ा े
06.05.2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/653/1997-आईआर (सी- I)]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 23rd May, 2013
S.O. 1139.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 58/1998) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government 06.05.2013.
[No. L-20012/653/1997-IR(C-I)] M. K. SINGH, Section Officer 2. The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 01.09.1998. After notice both parties are appeared. The Workman/Union files their written statement on 30.06.1999. The short point is that the Date of Birth of the workman as mentioned in Form"B" register as 09.06.1935 or the Date of Birth mentioned in Extract of CMPF Register maintained from 07.11.1973 as 07.06.1948 is correct.
ANNEXURE
3. In this case on the basis of the Form "B" Date of Birth is 09.06.1935 and the workman has been superannuated. But on close scrutiny of the CMPF register extract and letter to Deputy Personnel Manager Amol Project from Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner the Date of Birth of workman as 07.06.1948 which is a document sent at the earliest point of time. The CMPF Register has been maintained by the Provident Deptt. from 07.11.1973, is much more authentic. But the workman being illiterate has not stated anything regarding the CMPF register. No. suggestion was given to workman that CMPF register is tampered.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
(No. 1), DHANBAD
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D. ACT 1947.
Ref. No. 58 of 1998
Employers in relation to the management of Amlo Project of M/s C.C.L.
and
Their workmen
Present: Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
Presiding Officer
4. The form "B" register filed by the management does not bear seal of the company, no date is mentioned there. The workman was illiterate, taking of his L.T.I there not within his knowledge. The management if any doubt could has referred him for medical board. Since that has not been done.
5. The Date of Birth in the CMPF Register 07.06.1948 is accepted. His superannuation has been done illegally much before.
Appearances:
For the Employers. : Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the Workman. : Sri K.N. Singh, Advocate
State : Jharkhand.
Industry: Coal.
Dated. 06.04.2013 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, the action of the management of Amlo Project, C.C.L in superannuating Sri Ganesh Turi, T.R worker by not correcting his Date of Birth as per C.M.P.F records is illegal & not justified, Therefore the workman's service continuity be maintained accepting his Date of Birth 07.06.1948. If he is superannuated in the meantime the management to clear up his dues forthwith preferably within 3 months.
This is my award.
R.K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 24 मई, 2013
By Order No.L-20012/653/1997 -IR -(C-I), dt. 14.08.1998, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
का.आ. 1140.का.आ. 1140.का.आ. 1140.का.आ. 1140.का.आ. 1140. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स शुक्रिया
ट्रैवल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके
कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय
सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट
(संदर्भ संख्या 66/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार
को 09.05.2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-11012/74/2007-आईआर (सीएम- I)]
"Whether the action of the management of Amlo Project, CCL in Superannuating Sri Ganesh Turi, T.R. worker by not Correcting his date of Birth as per3015 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2013
S.O. 1140.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 66/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Shukriya Travels Pvt. Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government 09.05.2013.
[No. L-11012/74/2007-IR(CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
staff, namely, Shri Jamal Ahmed pleading therein that he was employed by the management with effect from 01.10.2002. His basic salary was Rs.5000.00 per month, besides other benefits. However, the management paid him Rs.4000.00 per month as basic salary, besides other allowances. When he questioned the management in that regard, he was told that the balance amount was deposited in his provident fund account every month. After about two years of his service, his salary was revised to the tune of Rs.10,000.00 per month. However, management regularly deducted Rs. 4000.00 per month from his salary, projecting that it was being deposited in his provident fund account. When he requested to make payment of balance amount of his salary, management terminated his services in an illegal manner on 11.07.2006. He served notice of demand on 15.07.2006, but to no avail. He claims reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages, besides recovery of arrears of his salary.
BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV PRESIDING OFFICER
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT No. 1, KARKARDOOMA
COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D. No. 66/2007
Shri Jammal Ahmed S/o Late Sh. Fazal Ahmed, V-405, Gali No. 26, Vijaya Park, Maujpur, Delhi.
...Workman
Versus
The Managing Director, M/s. Shukriya Travels Pvt. Ltd., M-107, IInd Floor, Punj House, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110 001.
...Management
AWARD
A senior counter staff was employed by M/s. Shukriya Travels Pvt. Ltd. (in short the management) on 01.10.2002 on a basic salary of Rs. 5000.00, besides other allowances. While being in service of his employer, the senior counter staff started his business also. When the senior counter staff developed his business, he stopped attending to his duties. Subsequently, he raised an industrial dispute claiming that his services were dispensed with by his employer. His claim was contested by the employer and a such conciliation proceedings ended into failure. On consideration of failure report, submitted by the Conciliation Officer, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, New Delhi vide order No.L-11012/74/2007-IR(CM-I) New Delhi, dated 16.11.2007 with following terms:—
"Whether the action of the management of Shukriya Travels Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi in discharging the services of Shri Jamal Ahmed, senior counter staff with effect from 11.07.2006 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to?"
2. Claim statement was filed by the senior counter 3. Claim was contested by the management pleading therein that the claimant was employed as part-time employee by the management. Being a part-time employee, there was no occasion for the management to pay him basic salary of Rs.5000.00 per month, besides other allowances. He was not covered under the provisions of Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948. There was no occasion to revise his salary to Rs. 10,000.00 per month. He started working with another firm, namely M/s. AI-Falgh Associates, Bombay. He was also doing his independent business. When his business was established, he stopped attending to the duties of the management. Subsequently, false demand was raised by him. It has been projected that the claim put forth by the claimant is devoid of merits, hence it may be dismissed.
4. Arguments on maintainability of the claim were heard. Shri Himal Akhtar, authorised representative, advanced arguments on behalf of the claimant. Shri S.S. Saifi, authorised representative, raised submissions on behalf of the management. I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:—
5. Before proceedings with the matter, it is pointed out that vide notification No.A-11016/3/2009-CLS-II, New Delhi dated 03.04.2013, additional charge of Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.II, New Delhi, was assigned to the undersigned by the appropriate Government and thus case reached this Tribunal for adjudication.
6. Clause (a) of section 2 of the Act defines appropriate Government. It would be expedient to know the definition of phrase 'appropriate Government'. Consequently, definition of the phrase is extracted thus:
"2(a) "appropriate Government" means—
(i) in relation to any industrial dispute concerning3016 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] and
(ii) in relation to any other industrial dispute, the State public sector undertaking, subsidiary companies set up by the principal undertaking and autonomous bodies owned or controlled by the State Government, the State Government;
Provided that in case of a dispute between a contractor and the contract labour employed through the contractor in any industrial establishment where such dispute first arose, the appropriate Government shall be the Central Government or the Stated Government, as the case may be, which has control over such industrial establishment".
7. In relation to an industrial dispute, appropriate Government can either mean the Central Government or the State Government, The Central Government has been defined under section 3(8) and the State Government under section 3(60) of the General Clauses Act, 1897. In relation to an industrial dispute concerning—
1. an industry carried on or under the authority of the Central Government, or a railway company or
2. an such controlled industry as may be specified
in this behalf by the Central Government, or
3. a Dock Labour Board established under section 5A of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 (9 of 1948), or
4. the Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited formed and registered under the companies Act, 1956, or
5. the Employees' State Insurance Corporation established under section 3 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), or
6. the Board of Trustees constituted under section 3A of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 (46 of 1948), or
7. the Central Board of Trustees and the State Boards of Trustees constituted under section 5A and section 5B, respectively, of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or
8. the Life Insurance Corporation of India established under section 3 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 (31 of 1956), or
9. the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited registered under the Companies Act, 1956, or
10. the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation established under section 3 of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee any industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government or by a railway company or concerning any such controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government or in relation to an industrial dispute concerning a Dock Labour Board established under section 5A of the Dock a Workers (Regulation of Employment)Act, 1948 (9 of 1948), or the Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or the Employees' State Insurance Corporation established under section 3 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), or the Board of Trustees and the State Board of Trustees section 5A and section 5B, respectively, of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or the life Insurance Corporation of India established under section 3 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 (31 of 1956), or the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), or the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation established under section 3 of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961(47 of 1961), or the Central Warehousing Corporation established under section 3 of the Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 (58 of 1962), or the Unit Trust of India established under section 3 of the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 (52 of 1963), or the Food Corporation of India established under section 3, or a Board of Management established for two or more contiguous States under section 16, of the Food Corporations Act, 1964 (37 of 1964), or the Airports Authority of India constituted under section 3 of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 (55 of 1994), or a Regional Rural Bank established under section 3 of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 (21 of 1976), or the Export Credit and Guarantee Corporation Limited or the Industrial Reconstruction Corporation of India Limited, the National Housing Bank established under section 3 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 (53 of 1987) or the Banking Service Commission Act 1975 or an air transport service, or a banking or an insurance company, a mine, an oil field, a Cantonment Board, or a major port, an company in which not less than fifty one percent of the paid up share capital is held by the Central Government, or any Corporation, not being a Corporation referred to in this clause, established by or under any law made by Parliament, or the Central public sector undertaking, subsidiary companies set up by the principal undertaking and autonomous bodies owned or controlled by the Central Government, the Central Government,3017 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 Corporation Act, 1961 (47 of 1961), or
11. the Central Warehousing Corporation established under section 3 of the Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 (58 of 1962), or
12. the Unit Trust of India established under section 3 of the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 (52 of 1963), or
13. the Food Corporation of India established under section 3 of the Food Corporation Act, 1964 (37 of 1964), or
14. a Board of Management established for two or more contiguous States under section 16 of the Food Corporations Act, 1964 (37 of 1964), or
15. the Airports Authority of India constituted under section 3 of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 (55 of 1994), or
16. a Regional Rural Bank established under section 3 of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 (21 of 1976), or
17. the Export Credit and Guarantee Corporation
Limited, or
18. the Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India
Limited, or
19. the National Housing Bank established under section 3 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 (53 of 1987), or
20. an air transport service, or
21. a banking company, or
8. In relation to any industrial dispute, other than those specified in sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of section 2 of the Act, appropriate Government would be the State Government. In other words, all industrial disputes which are outside the purview of sub-clause (i) are concern of the State Government under sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) of section 2 of the Act. Thus, the general rule is that an industrial dispute raised between employer and his employee would be referred for adjudication by the State Government except in cases falling under section 2(a)(i) of the Act. Consequently, where industrial dispute concerning on industry which does not fall within the ambit of section 2(a)(i) of the Act, appropriate Government cannot be the Central Government.
9. Shri Akhtar concedes that the present dispute is outside the purview of sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of section 2 of the Act. He candidly admits that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute, since appropriate Government for making reference of the dispute was the State Government. Shri Akhtar was right when he made admission to the effect that Central Government was not the appropriate Government for making reference of the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication. Thus, it is crystal clear that reference of the dispute by the Central Government to this Tribunal was incompetent. In such a situation, the Tribunal cannot invoke its jurisdiction for adjudication of the dispute. Dispute referred is not competent. An award is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dated: 01.05.2013
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 मई, 2013
22. an insurance company, or
23. a mine, or
24. an oil-field, or
25. a Cantonment Board, or
26. a "major port, or
का.आ. 1141.का.आ. 1141.का.आ. 1141.का.आ. 1141.का.आ. 1141. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स इण्डियनमैसर्स इण्डियनमैसर्स इण्डियनमैसर्स इण्डियनमैसर्स इण्डियन
एयरलाइन्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों
के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदर्भ
संख्या CGIT-1/46 of 2003) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार
को 29/04/2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
27. any company in which not less than fifty-one per cent of the paid-up share capital is held by the Central Government, or
सं. एल-11012/46/1999-आईआर (सीएम- I)
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
28. any corporation, not being a corporation referred to in this clause, established by or under any law made by Parliament, or
29. the Central public sector undertaking, or
30. subsidiary companies set up by the principal undertaking and autonomous bodies owned or controlled by the Central Government, the appropriate Government would mean the Central Government".
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2013
S.O. 1141.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT-I/ 46 of 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court No. 1, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Indian Airlines and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29/04/2013.
3018 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)][No. L-11012/46/1999-IR (CM-I)] M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1
MUMBAI
Present
JUSTICE G.S. SARRAF
Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT-1/46 of 2003
Parties :Employers in relation to the management of Parties : Air India Ltd.
And
Their workmen
Appearances:
For the Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh : Mr. M.B. Anchan,
Adv.
For the Air India : Mrs. Pooja Kulkarni,
Adv.
For the Livewell Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. : Ms. Purav, Adv. State
: Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated the 2nd Day of April, 2013
AWARD
1. This is a reference made by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows:
1. Whether the contract between Indian Airlines Ltd. and M/s. Livewell Aviation Service, is sham and bogus and is a camouflage to deprive the workers concerned in the petition No. 2163/99 before the Mumbai High Court, of benefits available to permanent workmen of Indian Airlines Ltd.?
2. Whether the workers concerned in the petition should be declared as permanent workers of Indian Airlines Ltd.?
3. What are the wages and consequential benefits to be paid to the workmen concerned in the petition?
2. According to the statement of claim filed by Secretary, Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh (hereinafter referred to as the Union) the workmen were employed as aircraft cleaners, cabin cleaners, hanger cleaners, carpet cleaners etc. for the services of the Indian Airlines (Now Air India) through M/s. Livewell Aviation Services (hereinafter refer to as the Contractor) for years together and for more than 240 days in a year and every year. Though the nature of work of the workmen is of perennial nature, the Air India did not make the workmen permanent deliberately and this constituted unfair labour practice. During the pendency of conciliation proceedings before Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Central), Mumbai all the workmen except 22 were discontinued from the employment by the Contractor with a view to bring pressure on the workmen not to pursue their remedy. The Contractor has done this without obtaining permission from the appropriate authority and, therefore, this amounts to illegal termination. Since the dispute was not considered fit for adjudication the Union filed a writ petition 2163 of 1999 before the Bombay High Court. Honourable High Court was pleased to allow the said writ petition and directed the Central Government to make a reference of the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal for adjudication. Accordingly the Central Government has referred this dispute to this Tribunal. According to the statement of claim the action of the Air India to employ the workmen through the Contractor by entering into sham and bogus contract is illegal and bad in law. On the one hand the Air India denied the need of the workmen and on the other hand it employed new persons in place of the workmen. The workmen worked with the Air India from 1984 to 1999 but no workman has been paid any compensation or notice pay as envisaged under Section 25-F of the Act. It has, therefore, been prayed that it be declared that discontinuace or termination of the workmen is void ab initio an it be held that the contract between the Air India and the Contractor is sham and bogus and is a camouflage and the Air India be directed to make the workmen permanent.
3. According to the written statement filed by the Air India the Contractor is a company rendering various services related to the aviation industry specializing in highly technical expertise and experience in aircraft cleaning and hygiene under the direct supervision of its highly qualified management team. The work of the aircraft cleaning is done by using sophisticated and most modern and internationally approved aviation materials. The job of interior and exterior cleaning of aircraft is done by trained man power of the Contractor with specialized equipments for various domestic and international airlines. The Contractor has entered into contracts with other international and domestic airlines also for the said purpose. Regular and permanent work force is appointed by the Contractor and the workmen are imparted with special training. They are liable to be transferred from one area of activity to another and from one establishment to another where similar activities are carried out. Consequent to the Central Government adopting the open sky policy several private airlines entered the domestic aviation industry giving rise to tough competition. Since the Air India did not have the resources it had no option but to take a policy decision and in furtherance thereof entered3019 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 into a contract with the Contractor for up keep and maintenance of aircrafts. The contract was entered into in 1996 and it has been renewed after regular intervals. The Contractor is holding valid licenses from the appropriate authority for the contracts awarded to it from time to time. The workmen are not employees of Air India. The workmen have not been employed by Air India and they have been appointed by the Contractor. The Union has no locus standi to represent the workmen. The contract between the Air India and the Contractor is genuine and such contracts are not prohibited by law. The Air India has prayed that the reference be rejected.
4. The Union has filed rejoinder wherein it has
reiterated its stand.
5. According to the written statement filed by the Contractor it is engaged in business of providing various types of aviation services to the airline companies such as Air India, Jet Airways, Alliance Airways etc. It engages its own workmen, staff, supervisors, officers, managers etc. for the said services. There is no division of the workmen that one particular group of workmen will work for a particular airlines as such all the workmen work for all the client airline companies and, therefore, the demand of the Union against the Air India is false and frivolus. It appoints the workmen and terminates them without interference by its client airlines companies. In fact its workmen are represented by Bhartiya Kamgar Sena and not by the Union. Out of the 109 workmen only 19 workmen are in its employment and these workmen work for all the airline companies. The wages and the benefits are paid to the workmen as agreed by it and Bhartiya Kamgar Sena. The wages are fair and proper and commensurate with its capacity to pay the same. The workmen have been employed by it and it has not terminated the services of any workman. According to the written statement the prayer of the Union is wholly misconceived, unjustified and untenable and deserves to be rejected in toto.
and is a comouflage to deprive the workmen all benefits available to permanent workmen of the Air India.
9. The sole witness of the Union Suresh Yadav Baile
has stated in his cross examination.
No appointment letter was issued by the Indian
Airlines. The workmen were kept by the Contractor.
He has further stated in his cross examination:
I know that Livewell Services provides services to other Airlines by appointing labourers/workmen. Livewell Aviation Services is expert for providing cabin cleaning and aircraft cleaning. Our duties are assigned by Livewell. The timings of the shift for working are decided by Livewell. The terms and conditions are decided by Livewell. The attendance for duty is recorded by Livewell. The leave is granted by Livewell. We work under the supervision of supervisor appointed by Livewell.
He has also stated in his cross-examination
I was given uniform by Livewell with its logo. I was issued attendance card by Livewell with its logo. The supervisor of Livewell used to remain present in the flight at the time of cleaning work.
10. I fail to understand how the workmen who are admittedly the employees of the Contractor can be absorbed and made permanent by the Air India.
11. The workmen have been appointed by the Contractor, their duties are assigned and the terms and conditions of services are decided by the Contractor, their attendance is recorded and leave is granted by the Contractor and they work under the supervision of the supervisor appointed by the Contractor. It is thus clear that the workmen are the employees of the Contractor and, therefore, they have no right to be declared as permanent workmen of the Air India.
12. In view of the above discussion Air India is not liable to pay and wages and consequential benefits to the workmen.
The workmen are not entitled to any relief.
Award is passed accordingly.
JUSTICE G. S. SARRAF, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 मई, 2013
6. The Union has filed affidavit of Suresh Yadav Baile and he has been cross examined by learned counsels for the Air India and the Contractor. The Air India has filed affidavit of R.A. Kamath and he has been cross examined by learned counsel for the Union. The contractor has filed affidavit of Sairaj Khatri but his statement cannot be read in evidence as his cross examination was incomplete and he could not be produced by the Contractor for completing his cross examination.
काकाकाकाका.
7. Heard Mr. Anchan learned counsel for the Union. Mrs. Pooja Kulkarni learned counsel for the Air India and Ms. Purav learned counsel for the Contractor.
. 1142.
. आआआआआ. 1142.
. 1142.
. 1142. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
. 1142.
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी सी सी एल
के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में
निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम
न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 141/2000) को प्रकाशित
करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13/05/2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
8. Let me state at the outset that there is absolutely no evidence on the record to prove that the contract between the Air India and the Contractor is sham and bogus3020 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[सं. एल-20012/506/1999-आईआर (सी- I)]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2013
They submitted Written Statement and rejoinder. But in spite of red. notice, parties did not turn up nor adduce any evidence by both side. Ld. Counsel of workman submits that the Union/workman is not connected. Therefore it is felt that there is not dispute between the parties. Hence a "No Dispute" award is passed.
R.K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 मई, 2013
काकाकाकाका.
S.O. 1142.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 141/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13/05/2013.
[No. L-20012/506/1999-IR (C-I)] M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
. 1143.
. आआआआआ. 1143.
. 1143.
. 1143. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947
. 1143.
(1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स
ई सी एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ
संख्या 77/1993) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
29/04/2013 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1),
[सं. एल-20012/87/1992-आईआर (सी- I)]
DHANBAD.
Lok-Adalat.
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2) OF I.D. ACT, 1947
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2013
Ref. No. 141 of 2000
Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra (S) Colliery of M/s. B.C.C.L.
And
Their workmen.
Present: Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
Presiding Officer
S.O. 1143.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 29/04/2013.
[No. L-20012/87/1992-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer Appearances:
ANNEXURE
For the Employers. :-Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman. :-None
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1),
State: Jharkhand.
Industry:- Coal.
DHANBAD.
Dated 26.04.2013
AWARD
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D. ACT, 1947
Ref. No. 77 of 1993
By Order No. L-20012/506/99IR(C-I), dt. 01/03/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
Employers in relation to the management of Shyampur 'B' Colliery No. XI of M/S.E.C.L.
And
Their workmen.
Present: Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
Presiding officer
Appearances:
"Whether the action of the Management of Bhowra South Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not regularising Sri Ramu Lal to the post of Chainman and in not paying the difference of wages is justified? If not to what relief is the workman is entitled?" After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed.
For the Employers. :- Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman. :- None3021 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935 State :- Jharkhand.
Industry:- Coal.
Dated 03/04/2013
And
Their workmen.
Present: Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
AWARD
Presiding officer
Appearances:
By Order No. L-20012/87/1992-IR (C-I), dated 22/02/ 1993, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
For the Employees :—Sri U.N. Lal, Advocate
For the workman :— None
State:- Jharkhand Industry:- Coal.
SCHEDULE
Dated. 11/04/2013
AWARD
"Whether the demand of Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union for regularisation of Shri Bhagat Routh for regularisation as water Carrier in Shampur "B" Colliery of M/s. E.C. Ltd. is justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
By Order No.L-20012/81/2004-IR-(C-I), dt. 02/07/2004, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
After receipt of the reference both parties are noticed. But none appears. After joining of this Presiding Officer both parties are again noticed by regd. post on 15.10.12. Still then none appears. It is felt that the Union lost interest in the case. Hence "No Dispute" award is passed. Communicate to the ministry.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 मई, 2013
''Whether the demand of Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the management of Kustore Colliery under Kustore Area of M/S BCCL for giving monetary compensation to the dependent daughter namely Parbatia Kumari and Suma Kumari of late Kushalya Bhuini, Ex-coal Breaker for the period from July 1997 to August 2000 is proper and justified? If so, to what relief are the said dependent daughters of the deceased employee entitled?''
का.आ. 1144.का.आ. 1144.का.आ. 1144.का.आ. 1144.का.आ. 1144. —औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी सी सी
एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच,
अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰ 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
69/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06/05/2013
को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/81/2004-आईआर (सी- I)]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2013
S.O. 1144.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 69/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06/05/2013.
2. The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 12.07.2004. After notice both parties are appeared. The Union/workman files their written statement on 15.12.2004 and thereafter rejoinder is also filed. The short question to be decided in the reference is the daughters of the deceased workman, who died during her service period entitled to monetary compensation or not as per NCWA.
[No. L-20012/81/2004-IR (C-I)]
3. The daughters of the dependent though claim for monetary assistance, the management, submitted that since the workman died during her service period, her dependent daughter who was unmarried, suma Kumari got employed by the BCCL management. Therefore as per the provisions of the NCWA no monetary compensation is to be paid.
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No.1), DHANBAD
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D.ACT, 1947.
Ref. No. 69 of 2004
Employees in relation to the management of Kustore Area of M/S B.C.C.L.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances, I hold that the demand of Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the management of Kustore colliery under Kustore Area of M/s. BCCL for giving monetary compensation to the dependent daughter namely Parabatia Kumari and Suma Kumari of late Kushalya Bhuini Ex-coal Breaker for the period from July 1997 to August 2000 is not proper and justified. Therefore the claimant are not entitled to any relief what so ever in the reference.
3022 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]This is my award
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
नई दिल्ली, 24 मई 2013
''Whether the action of the management of Bhowra Area No.XI of M/S BCCL in dismissing Smt. Archanna Samanta, Ex-Staff Nurse w.e.f. 18.8.87 is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?''.
का.आ. 1145.का.आ. 1145.का.आ. 1145.का.आ. 1145.का.आ. 1145. —आद्योेगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947
(1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी
सी सी एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्व नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं॰1, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या
30/1995) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05/04/2013
को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/119/1994-आई आर (सी- I)]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 24th May, 2013
S.O. 1145.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/1995) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05/04/2013.
[No. L-20012/119/1994-IR(C-I)] M. K. SINGH, Section Officer 2. Though both sides have filed their claim statements, none appears since last several years to file any documents in support of their claim. After joining of this Presiding Officer parties are again noticed. The Notice of the workman is returned back, but learned counsel of the workman submits that the concerned workman is traceless since last several years and not connected with me as such he is not interested proceed with the case. It is felt that the parties have lost interest in the case. Hence ''No Dispute'' award is passed. Communicate to the Ministry.
R.K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1146.का.आ. 1146.का.आ. 1146.का.आ. 1146.का.आ. 1146. —कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948
(1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा-(3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का
प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 को उस
तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4
(44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अघ्याय-5 और
6 [धारा-76 की उप धारा-(1) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के
सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है] के उपबंध तमिलनाडु तमिलनाडु तमिलनाडु तमिलनाडु तमिलनाडु राज्य के
निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थातः
केन्द्रकेन्द्रकेन्द्रकेन्द्रकेन्द्र
निम्न क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांवनिम्न क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांवनिम्न क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांवनिम्न क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांवनिम्न क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांव
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1), DHANBAD.
IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE U/S 10(1) (D) (2A) OF I.D.ACT, 1947.
नल्ली क्षेत्र तथा इलयिराम्पन्नै,नल्ली क्षेत्र तथा इलयिराम्पन्नै,नल्ली क्षेत्र तथा इलयिराम्पन्नै,नल्ली क्षेत्र तथा इलयिराम्पन्नै,नल्ली क्षेत्र तथा इलयिराम्पन्नै, 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. नल्ली
सात्तुर तालुकसात्तुर तालुकसात्तुर तालुकसात्तुर तालुकसात्तुर तालुक 2. करिसलपट्टी
विरूदुनगर जिला 3. चिन्नतम्बियापुरम
4. धर्मसनम चिन्न ओडैयपट्टी
Ref. No. 30 of 1995
5. पेरियम्पटटी
6. माडम चिन्न ओडैयट्टी
Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Area No. XI of M/S.B.C.C.L.
7. मुल्लिसेवल
And
8. सुब्रमणियमपुरम
Their workmen.
9. कंजम्पट्टी
Present: Sri Ranjan Kumar Saran,
10. पोथी रेडि्डपट्टी
Presiding Officer
11. पेथु रेडि्डपट्टी
12. इलयिरंपन्नै
Appearances:
13. संकरपाण्डियपुरम
For the Employers. :- Sri U.N. Lall, Advocate
14. उथुपट्टी
For the workman. :- Sri C. Prasad, Advocate
15. सर्वेकरंपट्टी
State:- Jharkhand Industry:- Coal.
16. ई॰ रामनाथपुरम
17. ई॰ रेडियापट्टी
Dated. 15/03/2013
18. सननकुलम
AWARD
19. मुंथडियापुरम
20. कंकरकोट्टै
21. कुगनपारै
By Order No.L-20012/119/1994-IR (C-I), dated. 29/03/1995, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause
22. सुरंगुंडी
3023 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : जून 15, 2013/ज्येष्ठ 25, 1935[सं. एस-38013/39/2013-एसएस- I]
[सं. एस-38013/40/2013-एसएस- I]
नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव
नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2013
S.O. 1146.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2013 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil-Nadu namely:-
Centre Areas Comprising the Revenue
Villages of
Nalli & Elayirampannai, 1. Nalli
Sattur Taluk, 2. Karisalpatti
Virudhunagar District 3. Chinnathambiapuram
4. Dharmasanam Chinna Odaipatti New Delhi, the 13th June, 2013
S.O. 1147.—In exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2013, as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely:—
Sl. Name of Revenue Had bast Name of Name of No Village Number Tehsil District
1 Dhankot 4 9 Gurgaon Gurgaon
[No. S-38013/40/2013-SS-I]
NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2013
5. Peraiyampatti
6. Madam Chinna Odaipatti
7. Mulliseval
8. Subramaniapuram
9. Kanjampatti
10. Pothi Reddipatti
11. Pethureddipatti
12. Elayirampannai
13. Sankarapandiapuram
14. Uthupatti
15. Servaikaranpatti
का.आ. 1148.का.आ. 1148.का.आ. 1148.का.आ. 1148.का.आ. 1148. —कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948
(1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा-(3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का
प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 को उस
तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त
अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त
हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 [धारा-76 की उप धारा-(1) और
धारा- 77,78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है]
के उपबंध उड़ीसा उड़ीसा उड़ीसा उड़ीसा उड़ीसा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थातः
16. E. Ramanathapuram
17. E.Reddiapatti
18. Sanankulam
19. Muthandiapuram
20. Kankarakottai
''जिला जाजपुर की दर्पण तहसील में (1) सुंगुडा, (2) रामचन्द्रपुर,
(3) देबतासाही, (4) दर्पणगढ़ (5) बड़चणा, (6) खोसालीपुर,
(7) देउलकुर के राजस्व गांव एवं जिला जाजपुर की धर्मशाला
तहसील में कांटीगाडिया एवं नेउलपुर के राजस्व गांव।'
21. Kuganparai
[सं. एस-38013/41/2013-एसएस- I]
22. Surangudi
नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव
[No. S-38013/39/2013-SS-I]
NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2013
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2013
S.O. 1148.—In exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2013, as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brough into force) and Chapter-V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Odisha namely:—
का.आ. 1147.का.आ. 1147.का.आ. 1147.का.आ. 1147.का.आ. 1147. —कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948
(1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा-(3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों
का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 01 जुलाई, 2013 को
उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के
अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है)
अध्याय-5 और 6 [धारा-76 की उप धारा-(1) और धारा- 77,78, 79
और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है] के उपबंध
हरियाणा हरियाणा हरियाणा हरियाणा हरियाणा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थातः
क्रमांक राजस्व भाग हदबस्त तहसील जिला
संख्या
1 धनकोट 49 गुडगांव गुडगांव
''THE AREAS COMPRISING OF THE REVENUE VILLAGES OF SUNGUDA, RAMACHANDRAPUR, DEBATASAHI, DARPANGARH, BARCHANA, KHOSALIPUR, DEULKUR in the Tahasil of Darpan and KANTIGADIA & NEULPUR in the Tahasil of Dharmasala, in the District of Jaipur.''3024 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 15, 2013/JYAISTHA 25, 1935 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [No. S-38013/41/2013-SS-I] NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2013
तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम
क
े
अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है)
अध्याय-5 और 6 (धारा-76 की उप धारा-(1) और धारा-77, 78,
79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है) के उपबंध
आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थातः
''आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में कृष्णा जिले के गन्नावरम् मण्डल के
सुरमपल्लि तथा अगिरीपल्लि मण्डल के अड़वीनेक्कलम् के राजस्व
गाँवों के अंतर्गत आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र।'
का.आ. 1149.का.आ. 1149.का.आ. 1149.का.आ. 1149.का.आ. 1149. —कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948
(1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा-(3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का
प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा 01 जुलाई, 2013 को उस
तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के
अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है)
अध्याय-5 और 6 (धारा-76 की उप धारा-(1) और धारा-77,78, 79
और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है) के उपबंध उड़ीसा
राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात :—
[सं. एस-38013/43/2013-एसएस- I]
नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2013
''जिला अनगुल की कणिहां तहसील में आलोरी, रासोल,
बारडांगूआ, गदाशिला, करढेइर््र, बलरामपुर, पथरमुण्डा, छेलिआ,
दण्डसिंहा, टाकुआ, तालकबेडा, रंगबेडा, कमरेई, बिजिगोल,
भीमकांड, काटेणी, नकनका, कणिहाँ, काण्डसर, कांईंशवेरेणी,
सारथीपाल, आम्बपाल, लोधाबंध, किशोरचन्द्रपुर जंगल,
सुनाखणी, श्बिरामपुर, रूतुभूई, जदूनाथपुर, बलांगी, हरिहरपुर,
डेरेंगा तथा मसुणीहता के राजस्व गांव।'
[सं. एस-38013/42/2013-एसएस- I]
नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2013
S.O. 1149.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2013, as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI (except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Odisha namely:—
S.O. 1150.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st July, 2013, as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely:—
''ALL THE AREAS FALLING WITHIN THE REVENUE VILLAGES OF SURAMPALLY OF GANNAVARAM MANDAL AND ADAVINEKKALAM OF AGIRIPALLY MANDAL OF KRISHNA DISTRICT IN ANDHRA PRADESH.''
[No. S-38013/43/2013-SS-I]
NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
शु(िपत्रा
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1151.का.आ. 1151.का.आ. 1151.का.आ. 1151.का.आ. 1151. —इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 07.02.1981 की
समसंख्यक अधिसूचना संख्या (का॰आ॰ सं॰ 92 (अ) भारत के राजपत्र
सं॰ 61, भाग-2, खण्ड-3, उप खण्ड (ii) दिनांक
1 फरवरी 1981 पृष्ठ सं॰ 215 पंक्ति सं॰ 9 में प्रकाशित शब्द
'इलावाधिरूथी' को 'एजुवतिरूति' पढ़ा जाए।
[सं. आई डी-55435/एफटीएस/2013-एसएस- I]
नरेश जायसवाल, अवर सचिव
''THE AREAS COMPRISING OF THE REVENUE VILLAGES OF ALLORI, RASOL, BARDANGUA, GADASILA, KARADEI, BALARAMPUR, PATHARMUNDA, CHELLIA, DANDASINGHA, TAKUA, TALAKABEDA, RANGABEDA, KAMAREI, BIJIGOL, BHIMKAND, KATENI, NAKANAKA, KANIHA, KANDASAR, KAUNSIBERENI, SARATHIPAL, AMBAPAL, LODHABANDHA, KISHORECHANDRAPUR JUNGLE, SUNAKHANI, SIBARAMPUR, RUTUBHUIN, JADUNATHPUR, BALANGI, HARIHARPUR, DERANGA AND MASUNIHATA. in the Tahasil of Kaniha of District. Angul.'' CORRIGENDUM
[No. S-38013/42/2013-SS-I]
NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.
New Delhi, the 13th June, 2013
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2013
का.आ. 1150.का.आ. 1150.का.आ. 1150.का.आ. 1150.का.आ. 1150. —कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948
(1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा-(3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का
प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा 01 जुलाई, 2013 को उस
S.O. 1151.—In this Ministry notification of even number dated 7th February, 1981 S.O. No. 92(E), published in the Gazette of India No. 61, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-Sec. (ii) dated 7th February, 1981, at page number 216, in 9th line, the words ''Elavathiruthy'' may be read as ''EZHUVATHIRUTHY''
[No. ID 55435/FTS/2013-SS-I] Printed by the Manager, Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
NARESH JAISWAL, Under Secy.