Servants of Knowledge
Weekly Gazette of India · Government of India

Gazette contains multiple Subjects

Published 26 May 2018

Ministry
Gazette contains multiple Ministries/Organizations
Part
Part II-Section 3-Sub-Section(ii)
Reference
794 to 843
Identifier
in.gazette.central.w.2018-05-26.186515
Languages
English, Hindi

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05 REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक WEEKLY

सं. 20] नई दिल्ली, मई 20—मई 26, 2018, शनिवार/वैशाख 30—ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

No. 20] NEW DELHI, MAY 20—MAY 26, 2018, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 30—JYAISTHA 5, 1940

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड ;iiद्ध

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

विदेश मंत्राालय

;सी.पी.वी. प्रभागद्ध

नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2018

का.आ. 794.—राजनयिक और कोंसुलीय अध्किारी ;शपथ एवं पफीसद्ध के अध्निियम, 1948 ;1948 का 41द्ध की धरा 2 के ख्ांड ;कद्ध के अनुसरण में वैधनिक आदेश । एतद्‌द्वारा, केंद्र सरकार भारत के प्रधन कोंसलावास, जेद्दाह में श्री राज कुमार, सहायक अनुभाग अध्किारी को दिनांक 10 मई, 2018 से सहायक कोंसुलर अध्किारी के तौर पर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के निर्वहन के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी-4330/01/2015]

प्रकाश चन्द, निदेशक ;कोंसुलरद्ध

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. DIVISION)

New Delhi, the 10th May, 2018

S.O. 794.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Raj Kumar, Assistant Section 2634 GI/2018

(3751)3752 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the Consular services with effect from 10th May, 2018.

[No. T-4330/01/2015]

PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)

अंतरिक्ष विभाग

बेंगलूर, 4 मई, 2018

का.आ. 795.—केंद्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ;संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोगद्ध नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम ;4द्ध के अनुसरण में एतद्‌द्वारा अंतरिक्ष विभाग के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने हदी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है :-

क्षेत्राीय सुदूर संवेदन केंद्र - दक्षिण ;आर.आर.एस.सी.-द.द्ध,

आईसाईट परिसर,

बेंगलूरु-560037

[सं. 8/1/10/2011-ह]

टी. कृष्णकुमार, अवर सचिव

DEPARTMENT OF SPACE

Bangalore, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 795.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following Office of the Department of Space, whereof more than 80 per cent staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :

Regional Remote Sensing Centre – South (RRSC-S), ISITE Campus, Bangalore-560037

[No. 8/1/10/2011- H]

T. KRISHNAKUMAR, Under Secy.

सांख्यिकी और कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयन मंत्राालय

नई दिल्ली, 18 मई, 2018

का.आ. 796.—केंद्र सरकार, राजभाषा ;संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोगद्ध नियम, 1976 ;यथासंशोध्ति 1987द्ध के नियम 10 के उपनियम ;4द्ध के अनुसरण में, केंद्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा सांख्यिकी और कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयन मंत्राालय के अध्ीन क्षेत्रा संकार्य प्रभाग, राष्ट्रीय प्रतिदर्श सर्वेक्षण कार्यालय के क्षेत्राीय कार्यालय, तिरूवनंतपुरम के निम्नलिखित उप क्षेत्राीय कार्यालयों को भारत के राजपत्रा में अधिसूचित करती है, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने हदी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है :-

1. उप क्षेत्राीय कार्यालय, कोच्ची

2. उप क्षेत्राीय कार्यालय, कोल्लम

[सं. ई-11013/6/2016-हदी]

अंजन कुमार मिश्रा, निदेशक3753 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGARMME IMPLEMENTATION

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 796.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of Regional Office, Thiruvananthapuram of Field Operation Division, NSSO of Ministry of Statistics and Progarmme Implementation in the Gazette of India, where more than 80 per cent of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi :

1. Sub-Regional Office, Kochi

2. Sub-Regional Office, Kollam

[No. E-11013/6/2016-Hindi]

ANJAN KUMAR MISHRA, Director

कृ िषकृ िषकृ िषकृ िष एवं किसान कल्याणएवं किसान कल्याणएवं किसान कल्याणएवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालय

((((कृ िषकृ िषकृ िषकृ िष,,,, सहकारिता सहकारिता सहकारिता सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याण एवं किसान कल्याण एवं किसान कल्याण एवं किसान कल्याण िवभागिवभागिवभागिवभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 18 मई, 2018

का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 797797797797....————के न्(cid:12) सरकार एतद्द्वारा ब(cid:17)राज्य सहकारी सिमितयां अिधिनयम, 2002 (2002 का 39) की धारा 4 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते (cid:17)ए दिनांक 20 मई, 2018 से 10 जून, 2018 तक डॉ. आशीष कु मार भुटानी, संयुक्त सचिव (सहकारिता) की अवकाश अवधि के दौरान के न्(cid:12)ीय पंजीयक सहकारी सिमितयां के कार्यभार की देखरेख के लिए 0ी दिनेश कु मार, संयुक्त सचिव (एमआईडीएच) को कृ षि एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालय, कृ िष, सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याण विभाग में नियुक्त करती है।

[सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एंड एम]

सुशील कु मार झा, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE

(Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare)

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018

S.O. 797.—In exercise of the powers conferred vide sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dinesh Kumar, Joint Secretary (MIDH) in the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare to look after the work of Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies during the leave period of Dr. Ashish Kumar Bhutani, Joint Secretary (Co-operation) w.e.f. 20th May, 2018 to 10th June, 2018.

[No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M]

SUSHIL KUMAR JHA, Under Secy.

पोत परिवहन मंत्रालयपोत परिवहन मंत्रालयपोत परिवहन मंत्रालयपोत परिवहन मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018

(क) एक्सिम यानांतरण कं टेनरों एवं (ख) खाली कं टेनरों के तटीय संचलन के लिए वाणिज्यिक नौवहन अधिनियमवाणिज्यिक नौवहन अधिनियमवाणिज्यिक नौवहन अधिनियमवाणिज्यिक नौवहन अधिनियम,,,, 1958 1958 1958 1958 िवषय : िवषय : िवषय : िवषय : (क) एक्सिम यानांतरण कं टेनरों एवं (ख) खाली कं टेनरों के तटीय संचलन के लिए (क) एक्सिम यानांतरण कं टेनरों एवं (ख) खाली कं टेनरों के तटीय संचलन के लिए (क) एक्सिम यानांतरण कं टेनरों एवं (ख) खाली कं टेनरों के तटीय संचलन के लिए

की धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायकी धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायकी धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायकी धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायत। त। त। त।

का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 798798798798....————

1. जबकि वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम को 1958 में उस समय अधिनियमित किया गया था जब कं टेनर काग@ शुAआती चरण में था (कं टेनरों के लिए आईएसओ मानक 1956 में निर्धारित किए गए थे)। भारत में कं टेनर पोत परिवहन वर्ष 1980 में3754 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] ही शुरू (cid:17)आ और इस प्रकार भारत में यह अधिनियम कं टेनर Iयवसाय से पहले लागू (cid:17)आ। इस अधिनियम के लागू होने के समय काग@ का यानांतरण उतना महत्वपूर्ण मुद्दा नहL था, दरअसल अधिनियम में ऐसी संभावना की परिकल्पना भी नहL की गई थी।

2. जबकि कं टेनरों के माध्यम से काग@ संचलन सतत रूप से बढ़ रहा है और वतर्मान में यह भारत के कु ल एक्सिम Iयापार की मात्रा के रूप में 20% से अधिक है तथा गतिशील अंतर्राष्ट्रीय Iयापार के ऐसे परिदृश्य में जहां अंतर्राष्ट्रीय पोत परिवहन शुल्क ब(cid:17)त प्रतिस्पर्Vात्मक हैं, बेहतर आXथक स्थिति (इकॉनोमीज़ ऑफ स्के ल) हासिल करने के लिए कं टेनर Iयापार का प्वाइंट-टू-प्वाइंट से हब-ए^ड-स्पोक मॉडल तक ती_ता से विकास (cid:17)आ है। इस प्रकार कं टेनरों को छोटे पत्तनों से फीडर जलयानों के माध्यम से यानांतरण पत्तन पर एकत्रित किया जाता है, जहां उन्हें यानांतरण या मैनलाइन पत्तन भेजने के लिए बड़े कं टेनर लाइनरों पर लादा जाता है। ऐसा मॉडल भारत में पूरी तरह विकसित नहL (cid:17)आ है और इसके परिणामस्वरूप लगभग 33% भारतीय कं टेनर काग@ विदेशी पत्तनों पर ही यानांतरित होता है। वर्ष-दर-वर्ष यानांतरण की मात्रा बढ़ती जा रही है और वर्ष 2007-08 के 26% से बढ़ कर वर्ष 2016-17 में यह 33% हो गया है (भारतीय पत्तन एसोिसएशन)।

3. जबकि कं टेनर पोत परिवहन के लिए Iयापार मॉडल, हब ए^ड स्पोक मॉडल पर दृढ़ता से स्थिर (cid:17)आ है और इसके कारण विश्वभर में यानांतरण हबों का निर्माण (cid:17)आ है।

4. जबकि पोत परिवहन और कं टेनर संभलाई तकनीक में तरक्की होने से आधार-जलयानों के रूप में लगाए जाने वाले जलयानों के आकार (18,000 टीईयू से अधिक) में दिन ब दिन वृVि हो रही है और अधिक गहराई के डुबाव वाले यानांतरण पत्तन िवकिसत किए जा रहे हैं।

5. जबकि समूचे विश्व में, वतर्मान में, स्थािपत यानांतरण पत्तन भविष्य में यानांतरण पत्तनों के रूप में अपनी उत्कृ ष्टता को बनाए रखने के लिए आधुनिक पत्तनों के रूप में अपने विकास के लिए अधिक से अधिक निवेश कर रहे हैं।

6. जबकि भारत में क्षेत्रीय हब पत्तनों के साथ प्रतिस्पर्Vा करने के लिए नीतिगत ढ़ांचों और लागत लाभों के साथ बड़े, आधुिनक, अंतर्राष्ट्रीय, यानांतरण पत्तनों/हबों का सुदृढ़ इको-सिस्टम विकसित किया जाना अभी भी बाकी है।

7. जबकि विदेशी यानांतरण पत्तनों में भारतीय काग@ का यानांतरण होने पर विदेशी पत्तनों पर यातायात में वृVि होती है, और इससे अन्य देशों में रोज़गार सृजित होते हैं, पत्तन और लॉजिस्टिक प्रभारों के रूप में भारतीय शिपरों/परेषितियों या निर्यातकों/आयातकों से होने वाले राजस्व में हानि होती है एवं विदेशी पत्तनों द्वारा भारतीय निर्यातकों/आयातकों से यानांतरण राजस्व एवं प्रभारों की वसूली किए जाने के कारण विदेशी मु(cid:12)ा की भी हानि होती है।

8. जबकि भारत में यानांतरण पत्तनों को बढ़ावा देने से (क) पोत परिवहन लाइनों के बीच प्रतिस्पर्Vा बढ़ेगी और समान अवसरों के कारण fै ट दरों में कमी आएगी जिससे भारतीय Iयापार और अधिक प्रतिस्पर्Vात्मक बनेगा। (ख) भारतीय पत्तनों बनाम विदेशी पत्तनों में समय एवं दूरी कु शल लॉजिस्टिक्स से भी फीडgरग लागत में कमी आएगी। (ग) भारतीय कं टेनर काग@ को विदेशी पत्तनों से भारतीय पत्तनों में अंतरित करने से पत्तनों के लाभ एवं रोज़गार में और अधिक वृVि होगी। (घ) यानांतरण इको- सिस्टम (पत्तन एवं लॉजिस्टिक्स सेक्टर, लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यमों, पत्तनों और पोत परिवहन क्षेत्र के सेवा प्रदाताओं को सक्षम बनाने सहित) की स्थापना होने से भारतीय पत्तन विदेशी पत्तनों से आने वाले और वहां तक जाने वाले काग@ को संभवत:

अपनी तरफ आकXषत कर सकते हैं, जिससे भारतीय महापत्तनों की काग@ मात्रा में और अधिक वृVि होगी तथा (ड.) िवदेशी मु(cid:12)ा को भारत में रखने में सफलता मिलेगी।

9. जबकि विदेशी पत्तन में सप्लाई लाइन लैग टाइम तथा यानांतरण से एक्सिम Iयापार की लागत में भारी वृVि होती है जिससे वैश्विक बाज़ार में भारतीय Iयापारियों और विनिर्माताओं की प्रतिस्पर्Vात्मकता पर प्रतिकू ल प्रभाव पड़ता है।

10. जबकि भारतीय पत्तनों और भारतीय यानांतरण पत्तनों के बीच समु(cid:12) के माध्यम से एक्सिम कं टेनरों के यातायात को प्रोत्सािहत करने के लिए फीडर क्षमता को बढ़ाने की अवश्यकता है।

11. जबकि भारत में यानांतरण पत्तनों को विकसित करने के लिए भारत में कं टेनरों के यानांतरण तथा फीडरों के लिए कं टेनर जलयानों की प(cid:17)ंच की सुगमता, समयबV सेवाओं की विश्वसनीयता और उपलब्धता एक पूर्वापेक्षा है।

12. जबकि दुतरफा काग@ संचलन की Iयवस्था करने से परिवहन की लागत में कमी आने, काग@ की मात्रा में वृVि होने और नौवहन बेड़ों में निवेश सुकर बनने की संभावना है।

13. जबकि समु(cid:12)ी परिवहन में रेल तथा सड़क मार्ग से परिवहन की तुलना में माल के परिवहन के प्रति टन-कि.मी. लागत में कमी लाने के साथ ही लंबी दूरी तक माल के परिवहन से होने वाले nीनहाउस गैस उत्सर्जनों को प्रति टन-कि.मी. एक तिहाई तक कम करने की क्षमता है।

14. जबकि वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 की धारा 406 के अनुसार भारतीय नागरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी कं पनी या भारत में पंजीकृ त किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किए गए किसी भारतीय पोत या किसी अन्य पोत को इस धारा के तहत नौवहन महानिदेशक द्वारा प्रदत्त लाइसेंस के बिना भारत में या भारत के बाहर के किसी पत्तन या स्थान से समु(cid:12) में ले जाने की अनुमति नहL प्रदान की गई है।

3755 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

15. जबकि कं टेनरों के यानांतरण के Iयवसाय मॉडलों से डील करने के लिए, कई देशों ने अंतर्राष्ट्रीय Iयापार की मात्रा बढ़ाने और परिवहन लागत को कम करने के लिए अपने घरेलू कानून (कानूनों) में रियायत देकर विदेशी ध्वज वाले जलयानों को अपने तटीय इलाकों में काग@ के यानांतरण की अनुमति देने के लिए कदम उठाए हैं।

16. जबकि भारत के एक्सिम Iयापार में कं टेनरीकृ त काग@ के qमश: बढ़ती हिस्सेदारी और किसी विशेष पत्तन से होने वाले आयात और निर्यात में असंतुलन के कारण कु छ पत्तनों पर खाली कं टेनरों और कु छ अन्य पत्तनों पर, उिचत आकार और प्रकार के रूप में, कं टेनरों की कमी की समस्या निरंतर बनी रहती है। इस प्रकार खाली कं टेनरों की रिइम्पोजिशनिग के लिए लागत में पर्याप्त बढ़ोतरी के बिना भारतीय तट पर एक पत्तन से दूसरे पत्तन तक सही आकार और प्रकार के खाली कं टेनरों के संचलन की आवश्यकता है।

17. जबकि निरंतर बनी (cid:17)ई समान प्रकार की मांग के कारण बेड़ों में पर्याप्त रूप से निवेश नहL हो पाता और इसके परिणामस्वरूप भारतीय तट पर खाली कं टेनरों की रिइम्पोजिशनिग के लिए लागत में बढ़ोतरी के बिना एक पत्तन से दूसरे पत्तन तक खाली कं टेनरों की संचालन की आवश्यकता पड़ती है।

18. जबकि 11 मई, 2018 की अधिसूचना सं. 38/2018 –कस्टम्स (एन.टी.) के अनुसार कें (cid:12)ीय अप्रत्यक्ष कर एवं सीमाशुल्क बोर्ड ने आयाितत माल, निर्यात माल, तटीय माल एवं विदेश में ट्रैांजिट या यानांतरण के लिए प्रेषित माल के वहन के लिए प्राधिकृ त समु(cid:12)ी वाहकों को इस शर्त पर अनुमति प्रदान की है कि उनके द्वारा उचित अधिकारी को समेकित प्रस्थान एवं आगमन मैनिफे स्ट इलैक्ट्रॉनिक रूप से भेजा गया हो।

19. जबकि मौजूदा विनियामक संरचना के अनुसार नौवहन महानिदेशक द्वारा वा^ियज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 की धारा 406 के तहत जारी किए गए लाइसेंस के अधीन ही भारतीय नगरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी कं पनी या भारत में पंजीकृ त किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किया गया कोई विदेशी पोत भारत के किसी एक स्थान या पत्तन से खाली कं टेनर को लाद सकता है या भरे (cid:17)ए कं टेनरों को भारत के अन्य स्थान पर प(cid:17)ंचा सकता है।

20. जबकि भारतीय पत्तनों को प्रमुख यानांतरण हबों के रूप में उपयोग करने हेतु अंतिम लtय स्थान तक यानांतरण कं टेनरों के परिवहन के लिए सुविधा प्रदान करने की आवश्यकता है।

21. जबकि, निuदष्ट पंजीकरण पत्तनों पर पोतों के पंजीकरण के आधार पर भारतीय पोत धारा 406 के तहत लाइसेंस के लिए अनुमोदित माने गए हैं और इनको यानांतरण की अनुमति प्रदान की गई है।

22. जबकि भारतीय नागरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी कं पनी या भारत में पंजीकृ त किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किए गए किसी अन्य पोत को भारत के अंदर या बाहर किसी पत्तन या स्थान से समु(cid:12) तक ले जाने के लिए धारा 406 के तहत लाइसेंस प्रदान किए जाने की आवश्यकता है।

23. जबकि, भारत में Iयापार को प्रोत्साहित करना और Iयापार करने को सुकर बनाना भारत सरकार द्वारा बल दिए जाने वाले प्रमुख क्षेत्रों में से एक है, और काग@ की शिपिग और जलयानों के प्रचालन की प्रqिया को सरल बनाने की आवश्यकता है।

24. जबकि उपयु र्क्त तथ्यों को ध्यान में रखते (cid:17)ए विदेशी पत्तनों के माध्यम से भारतीय एक्सिम कं टेनरों के यानांतरण को कम/समाप्त करने के लिए तथा खाली कं टेनरों की रिपोजिशनिग की लागत में कमी लाने के लिए जनहित और राष्ट्रहित में प्रभावी नीतिगत उपायों को लागू करने की आवश्यकता है।

25. अत:, वतर्मान में कें (cid:12) सरकार वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 की धारा 406 उप-धारा (1) के तहत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए निम्नानुसार िनदेश देती है:

25.1 भारत में तटीय Iयापार में लगे (cid:17)ए निम्नलिखित 0ेणी के पोतों पर धारा 406 की उप-धारा(1) के प्रावधान लागू नहL होंगे :

क. भारतीय नागरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी कं पनी अथवा भारत में पंजीकृ त किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किए गए पोत जो यानांतरण के लिए लदे (cid:17)ए एक्सिम कं टेनरों के परिहवन हेतु प्रवृत्त अिधिनयम की धारा 21 के खंड (ख) में नियत अपेक्षाओं को पूरा करते हों।

ख. भारतीय नागरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी कं पनी या भारत में पंजीकृ त किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किए गए पोत जो भारत के किसी पत्तन से भारत के किसी अन्य पत्तन तक खाली कं टेनरों के परिवहन के लिए प्रवृत्त अधिनियम की धारा 21 के ख^ड (ख) में नियत अपेक्षाओं को पूरा करते हों।

25.2 पैरा 25.1 (क) पर पोतों को दी गई ये रियायतें निम्नलिखित के लिए उपलब्ध होंगी:

क. लदे (cid:17)ए कं टेनरों को भारत के पत्तन में यानांतरण के उद्देश्य से भारत के बाहर स्थित किसी पत्तन से या वहां तक के लिए एकल लदान बिल पर पारेषित किया गया हो; और

ख. लदे (cid:17)ए कं टेनर पर भारत के किसी पत्तन पर के वल यानांतरण के िलए माल लादा या उतारा गया हो; और ग. लदा (cid:17)आ कं टेनर यानांतरण के लिए आगमन मैनिफे स्ट या प्रस्थान मैनिफे स्ट, जैसा भी मामला हो, के तहत कवर किया गया हो।

3756 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

25.3 चार्टरर को चार्ट किए गए जलयान के संबंध में नौवहन महानिदेशालय को सूचना प्रदान करनी होगी। सूचना प्रदान के

लिए निर्धारित फामxट अनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंध----1111 में दिया गया है और यह सूचना जलयान को चार्ट करने से 24 घंटे के भीतर sd2-

[email protected]ई-मेल से नौवहन महानिदेशालय को प्रदान करनी होगी। निर्धारित फामxट पर शिपिग लाइन अथवा

प्रचालक के प्राधिकृ त हस्ताक्षर कर्ता द्वारा डिजिटल या अन्य प्रकार से हस्ताक्षरित होना चाहिए।

25.4 भारतीय नौसेना, तट रक्षक, राज्य समु(cid:12)ी पुलिस और सीमाशुल्क के साथ-साथ भारतीय कानून प्रवर्तन एजेंसियों को

उक्त पोतों/qू के वास्तविक परिचय पत्रों की पुष्टि करने के लिए किसी भी समय समु(cid:12) में इन पोतों पर बोर्ड करने की अनुमित दी जाए।

26. यह अधिसूचना तत्काल प्रभाव से लागू होगी और यह संशोधित या वापस लिए जाने तक वैध रहेगी।

[फा. सं. एसडब्ल्यू-15011/2/2016-एमजी]

पवनेश कु मार शर्मा, अवर सिचव

अनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंध----1 1 1 1

नौवहन महानिदेशालय को चार्टड जलयान की सूचना प्रदान करने के लिए फाम1ट नौवहन महानिदेशालय को चार्टड जलयान की सूचना प्रदान करने के लिए फाम1ट नौवहन महानिदेशालय को चार्टड जलयान की सूचना प्रदान करने के लिए फाम1ट नौवहन महानिदेशालय को चार्टड जलयान की सूचना प्रदान करने के लिए फाम1ट

(i) चार्टरर का नाम
(ii) आईएमओ सं. सिहत पोत का नाम
(iii) पोत का ध् वज
(iv) चार्टर करने की अवधि

टिटिटिटिप्पप्पप्पप्पणीणीणीणी :::: जलयान को चार्टर करने के 24 घंटे के भीतर नौवहन महानिदेशालय को [email protected] पर ईमेल से भेजे गए ऐसे दस्तावेज शिपिग लाईन अथवा प्रचालक के प्राधिकृ त हस्ताक्षरकर्ता द्वारा डिजीटल या अन्य प्रकार से हस्ताक्षरित होने चाहिएं।

MINISTRY OF SHIPPING

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018

Subject : Relaxation under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, for coastal movement of (a)

EXIM Transhipment Containers and (b) Empty Containers

S.O. 798.—

1. Whereas the Merchant Shipping Act was enacted in 1958 at a time when container cargo was in a nascent stage (ISO standards for containers were fixed in 1956). In India, container shipping started only in the year 1980 and thus the Act predates the business of containers in India. Transhipment of cargo was not a major issue at the time of enactment, in fact the Act did not envisage such an eventuality.

2. Whereas the movement of cargo by containers has been rising continuously and is presently more than 20% of India's total EXIM trade volumes, and whereas in a dynamic international business situation where international shipping tariff is highly competitive, in order to achieve better economies of scale, container business has rapidly evolved from point-to-point to hub-and-spoke model. Thus the containers from smaller ports are shipped via feeder vessels and then aggregated at a transhipment port from where they are loaded in a bigger container liner for another transhipment or mainline port. Such a model has not fully evolved in India and this has resulted in almost 33% of Indian container cargo getting transshipped at foreign ports. The extent of transhipment is increasing year on year and has increased from 26% in 2007-08 to 33% in 2016-17 (Indian Ports Association).

3. Whereas the business model for container shipping has firmly stabilized for the hub and spoke model and has resulted in the formation of transhipment hubs worldwide.

3757 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

4. Whereas the advancement in shipping and container handling technology is leading to the deployment of ever increasing size of vessels (in excess of 18,000 TEUs) as mother vessels and development of deeper draft transhipment ports.

5. Whereas the currently established transhipment ports across the globe are investing further in developing themselves as modern ports of the future to retain their pre-eminence as transhipment ports.

6. Whereas India is yet to develop a robust eco-system of large, modern international transhipment ports/hubs with policy structures and cost advantages to compete with regional hub ports.

7. Whereas transhipment of Indian cargo at foreign transhipment ports leads to traffic growth at foreign ports and hence, job creation in other countries, loss of revenue from Indian shippers/ consignees or exporters/importers to foreign ports in terms of port and logisticscharges, and loss of foreign exchange to foreign ports as the transhipment revenues and charges are collected from Indian exporters/importers by foreign ports.

8. Whereas promoting transhipment ports in India would lead to (a) higher competition amongst shipping lines and a level playing field would reduce freight rates making Indian trade more competitive (b) time and distance efficient logistics between Indian ports versus foreign ports would also contribute to lowering in feedering cost (c) shifting of Indian container cargo from foreign ports to Indian ports would lead to higher port profitability and employment (d) upon establishment of transhipment ecosystem including ports and logistics sector, enabling small and medium enterprises, service providers to the ports and the shipping sector, Indian ports can potentially attract cargo originating from and destined to foreign ports, adding to further cargo growth at major Indian ports and (e) retention of foreign exchange in India.

9. Whereas the supplychain lag time and transhipment at a foreign port increases cost to the EXIM trade adversely impacting the competitiveness of Indian traders and manufacturers in the global market.

10. Whereas there is a requirement to enhance feeder capacity to support movement of EXIM containers by sea between Indian ports and the Indian transhipment ports.

11. Whereas availability, time-bound port operations and ease of access to container vessels for feeders and transhipment of containers within India is a prerequisite for development of transhipment ports in India.

12. Whereas providing for two-way cargo movement has the potential of reducing the cost of transport, improving cargo volumes and facilitating investment in shipping fleet.

13. Whereas sea borne transportation has the potential of simultaneously reducing the per tonne-km cost of transporting goods as well as reducing the greenhouse gas emission per tonne-km of transporting the goods over long distances by one-third, compared to rail and road based transportation.

14. Whereas as per Section 406 of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, no Indian ship and no other ship chartered by a citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a co-operative society registered in India shall be taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India except under a license granted by the Director General, Shipping under this section.

15. Whereas to deal with the business model of transhipment of containers, various countries have taken steps to allow vessels from foreign flags to trade on their coastal water for transhipment cargoes by relaxing provisions of their domestic law(s) to boost international trade volume and reduce transportation cost.

16. Whereas, due to the gradual increase in the share of containerized cargo and imbalance in the imports and exports from a particular port, there is a perennial problem of empty containers accumulating at some ports and shortage of containers at others, in terms of size and type. Thus, there is a requirement of movement of empty containers, of the apt size and type, from one port to another along the Indian coast without adding substantially to the cost of repositioning of the empty containers.

17. Whereas persistence of unidirectional demand leads to insufficient investment in the fleet and, as a result, there is a requirement of movement of empty containers from one port to another along the Indian coast, without adding substantially to the cost for repositioning of the empty containers.

18. Whereas as per Notification No. 38 / 2018 - Customs (N.T.) dated 11th May 2018, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has allowed authorized sea carriers for carrying imported goods, export goods, coastal goods or goods meant for foreign transit or foreign transhipment subject to delivery of an integrated departure and arrival manifest to the proper officer electronically.

3758 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19. Whereas as per existing regulatory framework a foreign ship chartered by a citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a registered society registered in India can load an empty or laden container from one place or port in India and discharge at other place or port in India, only under a license issued by the Director General of Shipping under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.

20. Whereas transportation of the transhipmentof containers up to the final destination needs to be facilitated to make Indian ports as major transhipment hubs.

21. Whereas Indian ships by virtue of the registration of ships at designated ports of registry are deemed approved for license under Section 406, and have transhipment allowance.

22. Whereas other ships which may be chartered by citizens of India or a company incorporated in India or a corporate society registered in India still require to be granted license under Section 406 to be taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India.

23. Whereas promotion of trade and ease of doing business in India is one of the major thrust areas of the Government of India, and there is a need to simplify processes for shipping of cargo and operation of vessels.

24. Whereas considering the above facts, it is necessary to put in place effective policy measures in public and national interest to reduce/eliminate transhipment of Indian EXIM container/empty cargo through foreign ports and reduce the cost for repositioning of the empty containers.

25. Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, directs as under:

25.1 The provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 406 shall not apply to the following category of ships, which may be engaged for the coasting trade of India:

a. Ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society registered in Indiawhich satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 in the Act engaged, for transportation of EXIM laden containers for transhipment; and

b. Ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society registered in India which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 in the Act engagedfor transportation of empty containers from one port of India to another port of India.

25.2 This relaxation for ships at Para 25.1 (a) shall be available for:

a. the laden container consigned on a through Bill of Lading to or from a port outside India for the purposes of transhipment at an Indian port;

b. the laden container loaded or unloaded at a port in India for transhipment only; and

c. the laden container covered by the arrival manifest or departure manifest, as the case may be, for transhipment.

25.3 The Charterer shall submit information of the chartered vessel to Directorate General of Shipping. The prescribed format for submitting the information is provided in Annexure I and must be shared with Directorate General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] within 24 hours of the charter of the vessel. The prescribed format should be either digitally signed or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.

25.4 Indian law enforcement agencies including inter alia Indian Navy, Coast Guard, State Maritime Police and Customs, shall be allowed to board such ships any time in the sea for ascertaining the bonafide credentials of the said ships/crew.

26. This notification shall come into force with immediate effect, and continue to be valid till it is amended or withdrawn.

[F. No. SW-15011/2/2016-MG]

P. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

3759 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

ANNEXURE 1

Format for information of chartered vessel to be shared with Director General of Shipping

(i) Name of the charterer
(ii) Name of ship with IMO No.
(iii) Flag of the ship
(iv) Period of charter

Note : the document so shared with Directorate General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] within 24 hours of the charter of the vessel should be either digitally signed or otherwise signed by an authorised signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.

नई दिल्ली, 22 मई, 2018

पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामानों के तटीय संचलन हेतु वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम िवषयिवषयिवषयिवषय : : : : कृ िषकृ िषकृ िषकृ िष ,,,, बागवानीबागवानीबागवानीबागवानी,,,, मत्स्यमत्स्यमत्स्यमत्स्यपालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामानों के तटीय संचलन हेतु पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामानों के तटीय संचलन हेतु पालन तथा पशुपालन संबंधी सामानों के तटीय संचलन हेतु

1958 की धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायत। 1958 की धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायत। 1958 की धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायत। 1958 की धारा 406 के अंतर्गत रियायत।

का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 799799799799....————

1. जबकि, कृ षकों की आय को बढ़ाने हेतु, कृ षकों की विqय को और अधिक बढ़ाने संबंधी आवश्यकता है, जहां विqय मात्रा में वांछित वृVि, सुगम प(cid:17)ंच के साथ देश को एक बाजार के रूप में खोलने के साथ ही, उत्पाद के एक बड़े हिस्से को बाजारों तक प(cid:17)ंचाने में सक्षम बना कर तथा मु(cid:12)ीकृ त करने से हासिल की जा सकती है।

2. जबकि, सरकार की घोषित मंशा है कि कृ षकों के लिए पूर्व निर्धारित स्थानों पर प(cid:17)ंच के साथ कृ षि Iयापार के सुगमीकरण और संरक्षण देने की मानसिकता को बाजार पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र का विस्तार करने, प्रतिभागियों की एक विस्तृत 0ृ ंखला को शामिल करने तथा कृ षकों को सुदूर स्थानों तक प(cid:17)ंच हेतु सशक्त बनाने वाली मानसिकता में परिवXतत करने की आवश्यकता है।

3. जबकि, पहले वह विपणन प्रणाली प्रभावकारी समझी जाती थी, जो खेतों की निकटतम सीमा के अंदर ही बाजार और लेनदेन उपलब्ध कराती थी, अब इन मापदंडों में बाजारों में परस्पर जुड़ाव एवं खेतों व उपभोक्ताओं के बीच वैल्यू डिस्पर्सन को शामिल करने की आवश्यकता है।

4. जबकि, घरेलू खपत और निर्यात बाजारों की आवश्यकताओं को कु शलतापूर्वक पूरा करने के लिए खराब होने वाले उत्पादों के भंडारण व परिवहन में कृ षकों एवं रसद प्रदाताओं को सक्षम बनाने में परिवहन संपर्क ता तथा रसद बुनियादी ढांचे की आवश्यकता होती है।

5. जबकि, जल परिवहन में रेल तथा सड़क मार्ग से परिवहन की तुलना में माल के परिवहन के प्रति टन-किमी लागत में छठवें भाग तक की कमी लाने के साथ ही साथ लंबी दूरी तक माल के परिवहन से होने वाले nीनहाउस गैस उत्सर्जन के प्रति टन-किमी को एक तिहाई तक कम करने की क्षमता है।

6. जबकि, सागरमाला कार्यqम की राष्ट्रीय परिप्रेtय योजना में खाद्यानों और संसाधित खाद्य के तटीय संचलन के लिए 9 मिलियन टन प्रतिवर्ष की क्षमता का अनुमान किया गया है।

7. जबकि, तटीय पोत परिवहन सहित, जल परिवहन के साधन तुलनात्मक रूप से परिवहन को सस्ते साधन होने के कारण कृ षकों को लाभप्रद रूप से Iयापक बाजार तक प(cid:17)ंचने में सक्षम करेगा, विqय योग्य माल की रेंज को बढ़ाएगा एवं घरेलू Iयापार के दायरे को बढ़ाया जा सके गा।

8. जबकि, निरंतर बनी (cid:17)ई एक समान मांग के कारण बेड़ों में पर्याप्त निवेश नहL हो पाता और इसके परिणामस्वरूप भारतीय पत्तनों को विश्वसनीय और समयबV सेवाएं प्रदान करने के लिए तटीय जलयानों की अपर्याप्त उपलब्धता होती है।

9. जबकि, दुतरफा काग@ संचलन की Iयवस्था करने से परिवहन की लागत में कमी आने, काग@ की मात्रा में वृVि होने और नौवहन बेड़ों में निवेश आसान होने की संभावना है।

10. जबकि, वाणिज्यिक पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 की धारा 406 के अनुसार उपयु र्क्त अधिनियम की धारा 21 के ख^ड (ख) में निuदष्ट अपेक्षाओं को पूरा करने वाले किसी भारतीय नागरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी भी कं पनी या भारत में पंजीकृ त3760 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किए गए किसी भारतीय पोत या किसी अन्य पोत को इस धारा के तहत महािनदेशक द्वारा जारी किए गए लाइसेंस के बिना भारत के अंदर या बाहर के किसी स्थान या पत्तन से समु(cid:12) तक नहL ले जाया जाएगा।

11. जबकि, निuदष्ट पंजीकरण पत्तनों पर पोतों के पंजीकरण के आधार पर भारतीय पोत धारा 406 के तहत लाइसेंस के लिए अनुमोदित माने गए हैं और इनको तटीय Iयापार की अनुमति प्रदान की गई है।

12. जबकि, भारतीय नागरिक या भारत में निगमीकृ त किसी कं पनी या भारत में पंजीकृ त किसी सहकारी-सोसाइटी द्वारा चार्टर किए गए किसी अन्य पोत को भारत के अंदर या बाहर किसी पत्तन या स्थान से समु(cid:12) तक ले जाने के लिए धारा 406 के तहत लाइसेंस प्राप्त करने की आवश्यकता है और इसलिए इनको तटीय Iयापार करने की अनुमति है।

13. जबकि, भारत में Iयापार को प्रोत्साहित करना और Iयापार करने को आसान बनाना भारत सरकार द्वारा बल दिए जाने वाले प्रमुख क्षेत्रों में से एक है, और काग@ की शिपिग और जलयानों के प्रचालन की प्रqिया को सरल बनाने की आवश्यकता है।

14. अत: के न्(cid:12) सरकार वाणिज्य पोत परिवहन अधिनियम, 1958 (58 का 44) की धारा 406 के परंतुक के अंतर्गत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए इसे जनता के हित में आवश्यक एवं लाभकारक मानते (cid:17)ए एततद्वारा निदxश देती है कि:

14.1 विदेश Iयापार महािनदेशक, वाणिज्य एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय द्वारा अपनाए गए एवं यथा संशोिधत अनुबंध-2 के अनुसार भारतीय Iयापार वर्गीकरण (आईटीसी), हाम@नाइज्ड प्रणाली (एचएस) में विXनदिष्ट कृ िष, मत्स्यपालन, कृ षि उत्पाद एवं बागवानी संबंधी सामानों के समु(cid:12) द्वारा परिवहन के लिए तटीय Iयापार में शािमल होने वाले भारतीय पोतों तथा भारत के नागरिक या भारत में निगमित किसी कं पनी अथवा भारत में पंजीकृ त सहकारी सोसाइटी द्वारा चाटxड किए गए पोतों धारा 406 की उप-धारा (I) के प्रावधान लागू नहL होंगे।

14.2 पैरा 14.1 पर पोतों के लिए छू ट इस शर्त के अधीन होगी जब पैरा 14.1 के अनुसार विXनदिष्ट कृ िष, मत्स्यपालन, कृ िष उत्पाद एवं बागवानी संबंधी सामानों के तटीय Iयापार की मात्रा ऑनबोर्ड शिप काग@ का न्यूनतम 50 प्रतिशत हो।

14.3 पैरा 14.1 और 14.2 पर पोतों के लिए छू ट इन शत~ के अधीन भी होगी, जब चार्टर/यात्रा संबंधी जानकारी नौवहन महानिदेशक को प्रस्तुत की गई हो। जानकारी प्रस्तुत करने के लिए निर्धारित फामxट अनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंध----IIII पर उपलब्ध कराया गया है तथा इसे भारत में पत्तन से पोत के चलने के कम से कम 24 घंटे पहले [email protected] ई-मेल पर नौवहन महािनदेशक के साथ साझा करना होगा। निर्धारित फामxट पर शिपिग कं पनी या प्रचालक में से किसी एक के प्राधिकृ त हस्ताक्षरकर्ता द्वारा डिजिटल अथवा अन्य रूप में हस्ताक्षरित होने चािहए।

14.4 उपरोक्त छू ट निम्नलिखित शर्त के अधीन होगी कि भारतीय नौसेना, तट रक्षक, राज्य समु(cid:12)ी पुलिस एवं सीमा शुल्क के साथ-साथ भारतीय कानून प्रवर्तन एजेन्सियों को उक्त पोतों/qू के वास्तिवक परिचय पत्रों की पुष्टि करने के लिए किसी भी समय समु(cid:12) में इन पोतों पर बोर्ड करने की अनुमित होगी।

15. यह आदेश तत्काल प्रभाव से लागू होगा और इसे अगले आदेश तक वैध माना जाएगा, जब तक इसमें संशोधन न किया जाए अथवा वािपस न िलया जाए।

16. इसे सक्षम प्राधिकारी के अनुमोदन से जारी किया जाता है।

[फा. सं. एसडब्ल्यू-14020/5/2009-एमजी/एसए(ख^ड-9)]

पी. के . शर्मा, अवर सिचव

अनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंध----IIII

नौवहन महानिदेशालय के साथ साझा की जाने वाली जानकारी के लिए फाम1टटटट नौवहन महानिदेशालय के साथ साझा की जाने वाली जानकारी के लिए फाम1 नौवहन महानिदेशालय के साथ साझा की जाने वाली जानकारी के लिए फाम1 नौवहन महानिदेशालय के साथ साझा की जाने वाली जानकारी के लिए फाम1

(i) मालिक/आपरेटर का नाम और पत् तन
(ii) आई एम ओ सं. सिहत पोत का नाम
(iii) पोत का ध् वत
(iv) चार्टर की अवधि
3761 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

टिप्पटिप्पटिप्पटिप्पणीणीणीणी :::: नौवहन महािनदेशक के साथ ई मेल [email protected] पर साझा किए गए दस्तावेजों पर नौवहन कम्पनी अथवा आपरेटर के प्राधिकृ त हस्ताक्षरकर्ता द्वारा डिजिटल अथवा अन्य रूप से हस्ताक्षर किए जाने चाहिएं।

अनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंधअनुबंध----2222

कृ िषकृ िषकृ िषकृ िष,,,, मत्स्यमत्स्यमत्स्यमत्स्यपालनपालनपालनपालन,,,, पशुपालन और बागवानी उत्पापशुपालन और बागवानी उत्पापशुपालन और बागवानी उत्पापशुपालन और बागवानी उत्पादों के अन्तदों के अन्तदों के अन्तदों के अन्तर्गत विचारणीय सामानर्गत विचारणीय सामानर्गत विचारणीय सामानर्गत विचारणीय सामान

1.1.1.1. विभिन् न विभिन् न 4 4 4 4----िडिजट विभिन् न विभिन् न िडिजट,,,, 6666----डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 2 िडिजट िडिजट डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 2----िडिजट एचएस डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 2 िडिजट एचएस कोडकोडकोडकोड िडिजट एचएस िडिजट एचएस
1.1 02- मांस और खाद्य मांस ऑफल
1.2 03- मछली और qस् टेशियन तथा मोलस् क एवं अन् य एक् वेटिक इन् वटब्रेस
1.3 04- डेयरी उत् पाद, पक्षी के अ^ डे, प्राकृ तिक शहद, पशु मूल के खाद्य पदार्थ, जो कहL और शामिल नहL हैं।
1.4 07- सब्जियां और कु छ मूल और कं द; खाद्य
1.5 08- फल और नस, खाद्य; साइट्रस फलों अथवा खरबूजे के छिलके
1.6 09- कॉफी, चाय, मेट और मसाले
1.7 10- अनाज
1.8 11- मिलिग उद्योग के उत् पाद; माल् ट, स् टार्च इन् यूिलन, गें का लासा
1.9 12-तेल के बीज, िचकने फल; िविवध अनाज, बीज और फल, औद्योिगक अथवा औषधीय पौधे; भूसा और चारा
1.10 14- वेजिटेबल प् लेgटग मैटीरियल; जो कहL ओर विनिuदष् ट अथवा शािमल न हो।
1.11 15- पशुओं अथवा सब् जी की चर्बी और तेल तथा उनकी विपाटन चर्बी
2.2.2.2. विभिन् न विभिन् न 6 6 6 6---- डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 4 विभिन् न विभिन् न डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 4----िडिजट एचएस कोड डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 4 िडिजट एचएस कोड
2.1 5101 से 5105 – ऊन, धागा बनने से पूर्व
2.2 5201 से 5203 – सूत, धागा/ सूत बनने से पूर्व
2.3 5301 से 5305 – वेजिटेबल टैक् सटाइल फाइबर जैसे पटसन, हैम् प और जूट।

New Delhi, the 22nd May, 2018

Subject : Relaxation under Section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, for coastal movement

of agriculture, horticulture, fisheries and animal husbandry commodities.

S.O. 799.—

1. Whereas to enhance farmers' income, there is the related need to enhance the selling volume of the farmers, wherein the desired increase in selling volume can be achieved by enabling a large part of the produce to reach markets and be monetized; besides opening up the country as one market with eased access.

3762 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. Whereas earlier, a marketing system was considered effective if it provided for market yards and transactions within immediate range of farms, the yardstick today needs to include, the interconnectivity between markets and the value dispersion between farms and consumers.

4. Whereas the transport connectivity and logistics infrastructure needs to enable farmers and logistics service providers to store and transport perishable products to serve the domestic consumption and export markets efficiently.

5. Whereas water borne transportation has the potential of simultaneously reducing the per tonne-km cost of transporting goods to one-sixth as well as reducing the greenhouse gas emission per tonne- km of transporting the goods over long distances by one-third, compared to rail and road based transportation.

6. Whereas the National Perspective Plan of the Sagarmala Programme estimates a potential of more than 9 Million Tonnes Per Annum for coastal movement of food grains and processed food.

7. Whereas water borne transportation modes, including coastal shipping, being comparatively cheaper modes of transport would enable farmers to access a larger market profitably, widen the range of goods which can be marketed, and lengthen the distances over which domestic trade can be conducted.

8. Whereas persistence of unidirectional demand leads to insufficient investment in the fleet and, as a result, inadequate availability of coastal vessels for providing reliable and time bound services to Indian ports.

9. Whereas providing for two-way cargo movement has the potential of reducing the cost of transport, improving cargo volumes and facilitating investment in fleet.

10. Whereas as per Section 406 of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, no Indian ship and no other ship chartered by a citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society registered in India which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) of section 21 of the above state Act shall be taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India except under a license granted by the Director General under this section.

11. Whereas Indian ships by virtue of the registration of ships at designated ports of registry are deemed approved for license under Section 406, and have allowance for coasting trade.

12. Whereas other ships which may be chartered by citizens of India or a company incorporated in India or a corporate society registered in India still require to be granted license under Section 406 to be taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India and therefore have allowance for coasting trade.

13. Whereas promotion of trade and ease of doing business in India is one of the major thrust areas of the Government of India, and there is a need to simplify processes for shipping of cargo and operation of vessels.

14. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under proviso of section 406 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 58), the Central Government being of the opinion that it is necessary and expedient in the public interest, hereby directs that:

14.1 The provisions of sub-section (1) of section 406 shall not apply to Indian ships and ships chartered by citizen of India or a company incorporated in India or a cooperative society registered in India to engage in the coasting trade of India for the carriage by sea of agricultural, fishery, farm produce and horticultural commodities specified in the Indian Trade Classification (ITC), Harmonized System (HS) as per Annexure 2, as adopted and modified by the Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

14.2 The relaxation for ships at Para 14.1 is subject to the quantity of coasting trade of agricultural, fisheries, farm produce and horticultural commodities specified as per Para 14.1 contributing to at least 50 percent of the cargo onboard the ship.

3763 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

14.3 The relaxation for ships at Para 14.1 and 14.2 shall further be subject to the conditions that the information about the charter/voyage will be submitted to the Director General of Shipping. The prescribed format for submitting the information is provided in Annexure 1 and must be shared with the Director General of shipping by e-mail at [email protected] at least 24 hours prior to sail of ship from the port in India. The prescribed format should be either digitally or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.

14.4 The aforesaid relaxation shall be subject to the following condition that Indian law enforcement agencies including inter alia Indian Navy, Coast Guard, State Maritime Police and Customs, shall be allowed to board such ships any time in the sea for ascertaining the bonafide credentials of the said ships/crew.

15. This order shall come into force with immediate effect, and continue to be valid till further order, unless otherwise amended or withdrawn.

16. This issues with the approval of competent authority.

[F. No. SW-14020/5/2009-MG/SA(Vol.9)]

P. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE 1

Format for information to be shared with

Director General of Shipping

(i) Name of owner/ operator and address
(ii) Name of ship with IMO No.
(iii) Flag of the ship
(iv) Period of charter

Note: The document so shared with the Director General of Shipping by e-mail at [email protected] be either digitally or otherwise signed by an authorized signatory of either the shipping line or the operator.

ANNEXURE 2

Commodities to be considered under agricultural, fisheries, animal husbandry and horticulture products

1. 2-digit HS codes, inclusive of the various 4-digit, 6-digit and 8-digit HS codes
1.1 02 – Meat and edible meat offal
1.2 03 – Fish and crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic invertebrates
1.3 04 – Dairy produce, bird's eggs, natural honey, edible products of animal origin, not elsewhere included
1.4 07 – Vegetables and certain roots and tubers; edible
1.5 08 – Fruits and nuts, edible; peel of citrus fruits or melons
1.6 09 – Coffee, tea, mate and spices
1.7 10 – Cereals
1.8 11 – Products of the milling industry; malt, starch, inulin, wheat gluten
1.9 12 – Oil seeds and oleaginous fruits; miscellaneous grains, seeds and fruit, industrial or medicinal plants; straw and fodder
1.10 14 – Vegetable plaiting materials; not elsewhere specified or included
1.11 15 – Animal or vegetable fats and oils and their cleavage products
2. 4-digit HS codes, inclusive of the various 6-digit and 8-digit HS codes
2.1 5101 to 5105 – Wool, prior to yarn formation
2.2 5201 to 5203 – Cotton, prior to yarn/thread formation
2.3 5301 to 5305 – Vegetable textile fibers such as flax, hemp and jute
3764 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 4 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 800.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2224 rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vgenuxj esa rkYkqdk dksijxkao dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 10 tuojh] 2018 rd miyC/k djk dh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA3765 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

vuqlwPkh

Rglhy & dksijxkao ftyk & vgenuxj jkT; & egkjk"Vª
ekStk @xzke losZ @ Cykd @ la- ¼IyksV la-½ lc&Mho&la- {ks=Qy
gsDVs;j vkjs oxZ ehVj
1 2 3 4 5 6
lkoyxkao 113 00 22 60
112 00 13 45
121@1 00 02 00
121@2 00 00 58
116@2 00 11 05
111 00 14 45
109 00 14 14
27@1 00 05 50
27@2 00 07 10
27@4 00 06 80
28@1 00 00 74
28@3 00 03 37
25@1 00 05 68
25@2 00 00 02
22 00 03 32
21 00 04 12
20 00 05 31
17@1 00 06 46
14 00 06 41
13 00 05 59
9 00 06 30
8 00 08 78
7 00 03 83
5 00 00 20
6 00 15 58
3@2 00 07 46
2 00 28 68
fryo.kh 16@2 00 40 37
14@1 00 16 74
14@2 00 19 14
13 00 17 38
59@1 00 04 93
59@2 00 03 80
60 00 09 75
61 00 01 91
86 00 07 40
87 00 06 29
88@1 00 06 92
89@2 00 03 46
89@3 00 03 45
91@1 00 06 80
91@3 00 03 75
93@1 00 03 49
94 00 12 38
95 00 03 39
96 00 00 20
101@2 00 00 71
101@3 00 09 32
101@4 00 10 12
101@5 00 09 65
108 00 08 37
109@1 00 04 13
109@2 00 03 75
111 00 09 21
113 00 08 39
114 00 03 25
117@1 00 27 23
117@2 00 16 74
133 00 30 08
132@1 00 20 84
132@2 00 22 50
216@1 00 00 20
131@1 00 08 82
131@2 00 29 61
218 00 19 10
219@2 00 08 71
219@4 00 08 44
220@1 00 05 79
221@1 00 41 21
221@2 00 07 66
227@1 00 02 63
vkisxkao 57@1 00 14 64
57@4 00 03 57
57@5 00 04 33
55 00 12 96
54 00 06 37
53 00 08 85
52@1 00 05 46
52@2 00 06 93
52@3 00 05 48
50 00 10 61
160@1 00 09 35
160@2 00 07 04
162@1 00 14 75
162@2 00 02 00
163@2 00 00 20
161@2 00 03 46
165 00 06 79
166 00 05 28
167 00 05 37
155@1 00 07 54
154 00 07 11
183 00 07 85
153 00 10 16
152@2 00 00 57
185 00 14 27
186 00 03 07
147@4 00 00 01
147@5 00 12 37
147@6 00 16 09
188 00 07 78
145@1 00 44 84
145@6 00 08 05
145@7 00 20 09
192@1 00 13 43
193@1 00 14 96
193@2 00 01 25
193@3 00 22 49
201@2 00 05 85
201@3 00 05 59
201@5 00 06 11
201@6 00 00 67
201@8 00 05 23
200@1 00 20 17
?kks;sxkao 43 00 36 28
44@4 00 32 08
45@1 00 05 68
45@2 00 05 89
45@3 00 06 28
46@2 00 07 66
Rkysxkao eys 70@2 00 01 97
61@1 00 14 90
61@2 00 30 40
60@2 00 01 78
62 00 10 74
63 00 11 99
64 00 12 57
65 00 14 09
55 00 03 09
54@1 00 11 60
54@2 00 14 84
53@1 00 14 56
53@2 00 04 49
53@3 00 04 28
53@4 00 04 32
52@1 00 09 08
52@2 00 13 11
52@3 00 20 54
49 00 00 78
51 00 10 90
111 00 12 44
110 00 08 00
109 00 12 84
108 00 12 35
105 00 23 28
104 00 12 98
119@1 00 19 43
119@2 00 33 18
118@1 00 07 33
120@2 00 07 35
125@1 00 05 35
125@2 00 11 47
125@3 00 05 15
125@4 00 06 21
125@5 00 05 19
125@6 00 09 33
125@7 00 04 99
125@8 00 04 35
125@9 00 04 49
136@1 00 11 09
136@3 00 18 78
136@4 00 11 02
137 00 03 67
139 00 07 55
140 00 04 11
141 00 00 24
144 00 00 20
3766 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3767 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3768 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3769 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3770 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 800.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas 2224 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Items in Taluka Kopargaon in Ahmednagar District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 10th January, 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Kopargaon District:- Ahmadnagar State :- Maharashtra
Mouja / Village Survey/Block No. Sub-Div-No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Sawalgaon 113 00 22 60
112 00 13 45
121/1 00 02 00
121/2 00 00 58
116/2 00 11 05
111 00 14 45
109 00 14 14
27/1 00 05 50
27/2 00 07 10
27/4 00 06 80
28/1 00 00 74
28/3 00 03 37
25/1 00 05 68
25/2 00 00 02
22 00 03 32
21 00 04 12
20 00 05 31
17/1 00 06 46
14 00 06 41
13 00 05 59
9 00 06 30
8 00 08 78
7 00 03 83
5 00 00 20
6 00 15 58
3/2 00 07 46
2 00 28 68
Tilvani 16/2 00 40 37
14/1 00 16 74
14/2 00 19 14
13 00 17 38
59/1 00 04 93
59/2 00 03 80
60 00 09 75
61 00 01 91
86 00 07 40
87 00 06 29
88/1 00 06 92
89/2 00 03 46
89/3 00 03 45
91/1 00 06 80
91/3 00 03 75
93/1 00 03 49
94 00 12 38
95 00 03 39
96 00 00 20
101/2 00 00 71
101/3 00 09 32
101/4 00 10 12
101/5 00 09 65
108 00 08 37
109/1 00 04 13
109/2 00 03 75
111 00 09 21
113 00 08 39
114 00 03 25
117/1 00 27 23
117/2 00 16 74
133 00 30 08
132/1 00 20 84
132/2 00 22 50
216/1 00 00 20
131/1 00 08 82
131/2 00 29 61
218 00 19 10
219/2 00 08 71
219/4 00 08 44
220/1 00 05 79
221/1 00 41 21
221/2 00 07 66
227/1 00 02 63
Aapegaon 57/1 00 14 64
57/4 00 03 57
57/5 00 04 33
55 00 12 96
54 00 06 37
53 00 08 85
52/1 00 05 46
52/2 00 06 93
52/3 00 05 48
50 00 10 61
160/1 00 09 35
160/2 00 07 04
162/1 00 14 75
162/2 00 02 00
163/2 00 00 20
161/2 00 03 46
165 00 06 79
166 00 05 28
167 00 05 37
155/1 00 07 54
154 00 07 11
183 00 07 85
153 00 10 16
152/2 00 00 57
185 00 14 27
186 00 03 07
147/4 00 00 01
147/5 00 12 37
147/6 00 16 09
188 00 07 78
145/1 00 44 84
145/6 00 08 05
145/7 00 20 09
192/1 00 13 43
193/1 00 14 96
193/2 00 01 25
193/3 00 22 49
201/2 00 05 85
201/3 00 05 59
201/5 00 06 11
201/6 00 00 67
201/8 00 05 23
200/1 00 20 17
Ghoyegaon 43 00 36 28
44/4 00 32 08
45/1 00 05 68
45/2 00 05 89
45/3 00 06 28
46/2 00 07 66
Talegaon Male 70/2 00 01 97
61/1 00 14 90
61/2 00 30 40
60/2 00 01 78
62 00 10 74
63 00 11 99
64 00 12 57
65 00 14 09
55 00 03 09
54/1 00 11 60
54/2 00 14 84
53/1 00 14 56
53/2 00 04 49
53/3 00 04 28
53/4 00 04 32
52/1 00 09 08
52/2 00 13 11
52/3 00 20 54
49 00 00 78
51 00 10 90
111 00 12 44
110 00 08 00
109 00 12 84
108 00 12 35
105 00 23 28
104 00 12 98
119/1 00 19 43
119/2 00 33 18
118/1 00 07 33
120/2 00 07 35
125/1 00 05 35
125/2 00 11 47
125/3 00 05 15
125/4 00 06 21
125/5 00 05 19
125/6 00 09 33
125/7 00 04 99
125/8 00 04 35
125/9 00 04 49
136/1 00 11 09
136/3 00 18 78
136/4 00 11 02
137 00 03 67
139 00 07 55
140 00 04 11
141 00 00 24
144 00 00 20
3771 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3772 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3773 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3774 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3775 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 4 ebZ] 2018

dk-vk- 801.—dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2216 v©j 2217 rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj&23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ukanxko dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 27 fnlacj] 2017 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

rglhy%&ukanxko ftyk%& ukfld jkT;%& egkjk"Vª
ekSts @xzke losZ @ Cykd @ la- ¼IyksV la-½ lc&Mho&la- {ks=Qy
gsDVj vkj oxZ ehVj
1 2 3 4 5 6
dâh 55 00 74 56
51@1 00 37 00
46@1 00 01 97
46@2 00 12 02
45 00 10 50
39 00 09 34
38 00 00 20
40 00 06 32
41 00 03 23
42 00 00 89
33 00 15 78
lVk.ks 6@7 00 00 09
6@18 00 03 42
6@10 00 04 69
6@5 00 04 41
6@14 00 04 82
6@1 00 04 41
7@2 00 12 11
7@5 00 02 93
7@6@v@1 00 07 93
7@6@v@2 00 08 37
7@8 00 11 10
7@9 00 03 37
8@1@1@v, c, d 00 12 94
8@1@2@c 00 05 42
8@1@2@v 00 06 67
8@3@c 00 06 69
8@3 d 00 06 96
9@2 00 10 29
9@3 00 09 37
9@4 00 16 93
10@1@c@2 00 08 92
10@1@v 00 06 80
10@1@c@4 00 07 11
10@3 00 06 55
11@4 00 05 49
13@2 00 01 01
13@3 00 00 55
14@1 00 05 44
14@2 00 06 86
14@3 00 16 31
14@7 00 09 41
14@11 00 05 81
14@12 00 34 31
14@13 00 00 41
15 00 42 52
oatkjokMh 237@1 iSdh 00 50 81
237@2 00 42 20
236 00 19 03
193 00 06 16
192 00 04 61
191 00 04 52
190@2 00 05 98
185 00 09 14
183 00 04 63
182 00 03 56
179 00 07 59
165 00 17 97
166 00 03 83
153@1 00 14 14
153@2 00 79 64
139 00 49 18
138@1 00 01 80
129@7 00 14 53
128 00 26 53
126 00 00 39
127 00 19 09
119 00 31 19
124@1 00 34 15
121 00 26 72
Ukkxkiqj 12@1 00 20 55
12@2@1@2@v 00 17 85
12@2@1@2@c 00 07 24
12@3 00 07 82
12@4 00 11 03
12@8@c 00 08 21
12@8@v 00 08 20
12@11@1 00 07 26
9@1@v, c@2 00 17 92
9@1@c@1 00 07 57
9@2@3@4@1@ c@2 00 02 74
9@2@3@4@1@v 00 09 82
9@2@3@4@2@v@2@1 00 07 18
9@2@3@4@2@v@2@2 00 03 62
8@2@v@1 00 06 50
8@1@v@2 00 06 46
8@1@ c 00 04 12
8@1@d 00 02 72
8@3@c 00 02 19
7@1@1@1 00 10 15
7@1@1@2 00 09 82
6@2@v@1@2 00 04 91
6@2@v@1@1 00 04 86
6@3@v@2 00 04 95
6@3@v@1 00 04 86
5@1@2@5@6@v@1 00 05 16
5@1@2@5@6@v@2 00 14 29
4@2@1@v 4@4 00 00 08 09 51 94
3@1@2@d 00 22 86
32 00 24 08
31@1 iS 00 11 64
38@v@1 00 09 30
38@v@2 00 09 07
49@1@1 00 11 59
50v@1 00 09 22
51@5 00 12 92
51@2 00 14 36
52@1@v@1@M 00 06 88
52@1@v@1@v 00 05 51
52@6@v 00 03 49
52@9 00 03 49
52@8 00 07 46
53@1@v@1 00 13 33
53@1@v@3 00 12 47
58@1@d 00 13 57
58@1@c 00 12 42
59@1 00 05 87
59@2 00 07 33
59@1@3 00 06 38
59@4 00 06 87
60@3@v@2 00 03 14
60@2@1 00 17 85
60@2@2 00 12 78
61@1@1@d 00 14 61
61@1@1@c 00 07 70
61@1@1@V 00 03 74
61@1@1@M 00 04 60
63@1@d@2@v 00 11 53
63@1@d@2@ c 00 07 01
63@2 00 15 99
63@3 00 24 25
63@1@c@2 00 00 78
3776 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3777 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3778 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3779 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 801.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide S.O. No. 2216 and 2217 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Nandgaon in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 27th December, 2017;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.

3780 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Nandgaon District:- Nashik State :- Maharashtra
Mouje / Village Survey/Block No. Sub-Div-No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Karhi 55 00 74 56
51/1 00 37 00
46/1 00 01 97
46/2 00 12 02
45 00 10 50
39 00 09 34
38 00 00 20
40 00 06 32
41 00 03 23
42 00 00 89
33 00 15 78
Satane 6/7 00 00 09
6/18 00 03 42
6/10 00 04 69
6/5 00 04 41
6/14 00 04 82
6/1 00 04 41
7/2 00 12 11
7/5 00 02 93
7/6/A/1 00 07 93
7/6/A/2 00 08 37
7/8 00 11 10
7/9 00 03 37
8/1/1/A, B, C 00 12 94
8/1/2/B 00 05 42
8/1/2/A 00 06 67
8/3/B 00 06 69
8/3/C 00 06 96
9/2 00 10 29
9/3 00 09 37
9/4 00 16 93
10/1/B/2 00 08 92
10/1/A 00 06 80
10/1/B/4 00 07 11
10/3 00 06 55
11/4 00 05 49
13/2 00 01 01
13/3 00 00 55
14/1 00 05 44
14/2 00 06 86
14/3 00 16 31
14/7 00 09 41
14/11 00 05 81
14/12 00 34 31
14/13 00 00 41
15 00 42 52
Wanjarwadi 237/1 PAIKY 00 50 81
237/2 00 42 20
236 00 19 03
193 00 06 16
192 00 04 61
191 00 04 52
190/2 00 05 98
185 00 09 14
183 00 04 63
182 00 03 56
179 00 07 59
165 00 17 97
166 00 03 83
153/1 00 14 14
153/2 00 79 64
139 00 49 18
138/1 00 01 80
129/7 00 14 53
128 00 26 53
126 00 00 39
127 00 19 09
119 00 31 19
124/1 00 34 15
121 00 26 72
Nagapur 12/1 00 20 55
12/2/1/2/A 00 17 85
12/2/1/2/B 00 07 24
12/3 00 07 82
12/4 00 11 03
12/8/ B 00 08 21
12/8/ A 00 08 20
12/11/1 00 07 26
9/1/ A & 9/1/ B/2 00 17 92
9/1/ B/1 00 07 57
9/2/3/4/1/ B/2 00 02 74
9/2/3/4/1/ A 00 09 82
9/2/3/4/2/ A/2/1 00 07 18
9/2/3/4/2/ A/2/2 00 03 62
8/2/A/1 00 06 50
8/1/A/2 00 06 46
8/1/B 00 04 12
8/1/C 00 02 72
8/3/B 00 02 19
7/1/1/1 00 10 15
7/1/1/2 00 09 82
6/2/A/1/2 00 04 91
6/2/A/1/1 00 04 86
6/3/A/2 00 04 95
6/3/A/1 00 04 86
5/1/2/5/6/A/1 00 05 16
5/1/2/5/6/ A/2 00 14 29
4/2/1/ A 00 08 51
4/4 00 09 94
3/1/2/C 00 22 86
32 00 24 08
31/1P 00 11 64
38/A/1 00 09 30
38/A/2 00 09 07
49/1/1 00 11 59
50A/1 00 09 22
51/5 00 12 92
51/2 00 14 36
52/1/ A/1/D 00 06 88
52/1/A/1/A 00 05 51
52/6/A 00 03 49
52/9 00 03 49
52/8 00 07 46
53/1/A/1 00 13 33
53/1/A/3 00 12 47
58/1/C 00 13 57
58/1/B 00 12 42
59/1 00 05 87
59/2 00 07 33
59/1/3 00 06 38
59/4 00 06 87
60/3/A/2 00 03 14
60/2/1 00 17 85
60/2/2 00 12 78
61/1/1/C 00 14 61
61/1/1/B 00 07 70
61/1/1/T 00 03 74
61/1/1/D 00 04 60
63/1/C/2/A 00 11 53
63/1/C/2/B 00 07 01
63/2 00 15 99
63/3 00 24 25
63/1/B/2 00 00 78
3781 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3782 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3783 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3784 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 4 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 802802802802.... ———— dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2227 rkjh[k 18 flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj&23 flrEcj 2017] esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk vkSjaxkckn esa rkYkqdk oStkiqj dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 30 fnlacj] 2017 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk, (

vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

rglhy%&oStkiqj ftyk%& vkSjaxkckn jkT;%& egkjk"Vª
ekSts @xzke losZ @ Cykd @ la- ¼IyksV la-½ lc&Mho&la- {ks=Qy
gsDVj vkj oxZ ehVj
1 2 3 4 5 6
lqjkYkk 262 00 05 38
261 00 20 97
260 00 11 31
256 00 31 56
252 00 10 87
251 00 50 94
250 00 33 92
277 00 23 81
275 00 14 87
274 00 03 59
278 00 34 66
243 00 00 68
236 00 22 98
242 00 00 60
241 00 14 32
238 00 32 20
117 00 20 25
118 00 55 88
120 00 21 57
124 00 24 22
125 00 10 04
126 00 09 41
127 00 03 93
163 00 12 86
164 00 14 95
165 00 12 35
171 00 13 52
172 00 27 48
175 00 25 44
176 00 06 41
dhjRkIkqj 67 00 37 07
60 00 28 61
61 00 37 79
58 00 27 70
47 00 15 56
48 00 44 36
49 00 02 68
45 00 38 06
44 00 07 96
Hkmj 134 00 07 64
xk¢¸kxkaOk 18 00 27 41
17 00 26 90
15 00 13 53
43 00 00 20
44 00 12 58
50 00 20 50
51 00 18 11
52 00 10 66
54 00 22 32
56 00 18 77
68 00 12 26
65 00 13 86
66 00 02 93
62 00 14 18
61 00 10 53
105 00 31 49
107 00 16 61
108 00 17 10
111 00 17 08
112 00 18 28
113 00 01 94
YkkMXkkao 307 00 06 02
308 00 14 00
305 00 28 96
304 00 09 35
294 00 92 44
292 00 52 70
283 00 56 07
226 00 17 62
227 00 37 71
228 00 13 11
234 00 11 96
235 00 07 94
237 00 10 44
194 00 12 99
193 00 14 08
182 00 12 70
181 00 12 79
180 00 27 82
179 00 25 15
178 00 18 72
177 00 14 25
174 00 36 53
173 00 08 79
172 00 10 68
171 00 16 33
170 00 17 96
169 00 07 24
167 00 07 70
lko[k¢M XkaXkk 179 00 76 16
180 00 24 51
181 00 24 52
182 00 12 54
183 00 14 17
184 00 29 80
186 00 19 14
187 00 16 43
188 00 48 08
189 00 18 20
190 00 18 22
191 00 15 94
193 00 31 09
192 00 02 55
195 00 00 31
194 00 50 83
146 00 29 04
147 00 18 03
145 00 53 11
144 00 11 84
136 00 57 30
135 00 63 50
116 00 40 88
3785 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3786 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3787 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 802.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide S.O. No. 2227 dated the 18th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September, 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Aurangabad District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 30th December, 2017;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the Central Government;

3788 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Vaijapur District:- Aurangabad State :- Maharashtra
Mouja / Village Survey/Block No. Sub-Div-No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Surala 262 00 05 38
261 00 20 97
260 00 11 31
256 00 31 56
252 00 10 87
251 00 50 94
250 00 33 92
277 00 23 81
275 00 14 87
274 00 03 59
278 00 34 66
243 00 00 68
236 00 22 98
242 00 00 60
241 00 14 32
238 00 32 20
117 00 20 25
118 00 55 88
120 00 21 57
124 00 24 22
125 00 10 04
126 00 09 41
127 00 03 93
163 00 12 86
164 00 14 95
165 00 12 35
171 00 13 52
172 00 27 48
175 00 25 44
176 00 06 41
Keeratpur 67 00 37 07
60 00 28 61
61 00 37 79
58 00 27 70
47 00 15 56
48 00 44 36
49 00 02 68
45 00 38 06
44 00 07 96
Bhaur 134 00 07 64
Goygaon 18 00 27 41
17 00 26 90
15 00 13 53
43 00 00 20
44 00 12 58
50 00 20 50
51 00 18 11
52 00 10 66
54 00 22 32
56 00 18 77
68 00 12 26
65 00 13 86
66 00 02 93
62 00 14 18
61 00 10 53
105 00 31 49
107 00 16 61
108 00 17 10
111 00 17 08
112 00 18 28
113 00 01 94
Ladgaon 307 00 06 02
308 00 14 00
305 00 28 96
304 00 09 35
294 00 92 44
292 00 52 70
283 00 56 07
226 00 17 62
227 00 37 71
228 00 13 11
234 00 11 96
235 00 07 94
237 00 10 44
194 00 12 99
193 00 14 08
182 00 12 70
181 00 12 79
180 00 27 82
179 00 25 15
178 00 18 72
177 00 14 25
174 00 36 53
173 00 08 79
172 00 10 68
171 00 16 33
170 00 17 96
169 00 07 24
167 00 07 70
Sawkheda Ganga 179 00 76 16
180 00 24 51
181 00 24 52
182 00 12 54
183 00 14 17
184 00 29 80
186 00 19 14
187 00 16 43
188 00 48 08
189 00 18 20
190 00 18 22
191 00 15 94
193 00 31 09
192 00 02 55
195 00 00 31
194 00 50 83
146 00 29 04
147 00 18 03
145 00 53 11
144 00 11 84
136 00 57 30
135 00 63 50
116 00 40 88
3789 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3790 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3791 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 4 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 803803803803.... ———— dsUnzh; ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gSa½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2219 rkjh[k 14 flrEcj] 2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] rkjh[k 17 flrEcj & 23 flrEcj 2017 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh }kjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa egkjk"Vª jkT; esa ftyk ukfld esa rkYkqdk ;soyk dks;yh & vgenuxj & lksykiqj isVªksfy;e ifjogu ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh (

vkSj mä jkti= vf/kfu;e dh izfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k 04 tuojh] 2018 rd miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh (

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu dsUæh; ljdkj dks fjiksVZ dh gS (

vkSj dsUæh; ljdkj us] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij fd mä Hkwfe ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS (

vr% vc] dsUæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk, (3792 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] vkSj ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk izn~Ùk 'kfä;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls dsUæh; ljdkj esa fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä gksdj bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxh A

isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbZu vf/kfu;e] 1962 dh /kkjk 10 ds v/khu fdlh Hkh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM iw.kZr;k mÙkjnk;h gksxh vkSj ikbiykbZu ls lEcfU/kr fdlh Hkh ekeys ij dsUæh; ljdkj ds fo#) dksbZ okn nkok ;k dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha gks ldsxhA

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

rglhy%&;soyk ftyk%& ukfld jkT;%& egkjk"Vª
ekStk @xzke losZ @ Cykd @ la- ¼IyksV la-½ lc&Mho&la- {ks=Qy
gsDVs;j vkjs oxZ ehVj
1 2 3 4 5 6
olaruxj 21@1 00 23 71
21@2 00 17 07
18@1 00 01 72
22@1 00 00 20
25@1 00 00 48
25@2 00 36 27
24 00 06 56
26 00 35 32
27@1 00 00 25
27@2 00 26 93
27@3 00 27 07
14@2 00 58 36
13@1 00 56 50
13@2 00 36 00
31 00 55 26
32 00 10 60
33@1 00 31 14
33@2 00 16 59
33@3 00 13 09
33@4 00 16 14
1 00 79 52
4 00 74 03
dqlekM+h 433 iSdh 00 25 76
400 00 23 42
399 00 23 42
394 00 26 49
393 00 17 68
391 00 10 43
390@2 00 06 67
390@3 00 05 07
389 00 07 99
387 00 08 45
385 00 29 30
382 00 00 20
374 00 31 16
373 00 00 71
368 00 04 33
367 00 09 89
363 00 22 68
364 00 25 37
362 00 00 35
359 00 16 29
/kkeksM+s 72 00 25 00
77 00 03 45
78@1 00 12 55
79@1 00 06 70
79@2@c 00 06 72
82@2 00 05 82
84 00 08 41
87 00 09 31
89@1@v 00 08 21
89@1@c 00 08 80
90@2 00 30 78
91@1 00 20 86
91@2 00 30 07
94@1 00 23 37
94@2@2@c 00 06 33
94@2@3@d 00 06 00
94@2@4@M 00 05 22
94@2@5@b 00 05 22
112 00 05 45
145 00 01 69
144 00 05 48
131 00 12 29
130 00 11 75
227@1@v 00 11 27
230 00 14 24
229 00 09 33
228 00 29 36
237 00 13 32
236 00 15 28
333 00 30 29
255@1 00 17 51
255@2 00 03 89
268 00 14 57
269 00 00 20
329 00 32 31
328@1 00 13 37
328@2 00 15 98
328@3 00 22 19
319@2 00 06 64
279 00 01 37
280 00 15 71
281 00 11 09
282 00 07 13
288 00 33 28
289 00 13 64
316@1@v 00 15 99
316@2@c 00 12 82
316@2 00 15 75
293 00 04 70
315@1 00 00 20
294 00 15 64
295 00 12 33
296 00 07 35
297 00 06 96
298 00 07 39
300@1 00 04 34
299 00 41 93
x.ks'kiqj 48 00 15 49
49 00 01 68
uxjlqy 1046@1 00 09 98
1045 00 30 85
1043 00 23 02
1042 00 10 93
1041 00 05 58
1040 00 06 51
1039 00 04 16
1038 00 12 49
ekrqyBk.k 243@2 00 10 03
243@3 00 01 88
243@5 00 09 40
243@6 00 27 02
247@1 00 10 49
247@2 00 19 05
250@1 00 03 55
250@2 00 12 19
251@v 00 08 45
251@c 00 03 54
253 00 02 77
240 00 26 07
239 00 11 75
237 00 13 63
236@1 00 02 58
256@v 00 22 45
228 00 53 24
227@2@2 00 04 64
212 00 01 40
210@1 00 06 03
210@2 00 21 30
211 00 12 02
214 00 02 07
213 00 09 49
214iSdh 00 11 15
221 00 22 75
173 00 09 42
160 00 00 91
162@1 00 17 02
161 00 12 01
159@v 00 04 09
159@M 00 39 99
159@,Q 00 10 27
159@ts 00 04 84
158@1 00 11 85
153 00 08 45
152@2 00 13 69
152@3 00 15 96
cYgsxkao 17@1 00 03 14
18 00 46 88
20@1c 00 02 02
20@1d@1 00 25 77
20@1d@2 00 11 11
20@2c 00 12 53
51@1c 00 00 54
50@1@1v 00 08 16
50@1@1c 00 09 19
50@1@3@2 00 09 61
50@1@2 00 10 12
48@1 00 18 59
48@3 00 14 80
46@3v 00 12 91
47@1v 00 13 18
47@1c 00 15 72
47@2 00 06 72
43@1v 00 21 98
43@1c 00 02 49
43@2c 00 22 28
55@2@1 00 01 72
42@1 00 00 44
56@@1@2@A 00 31 40
56@1@2@c@2 00 19 81
56@1@2@c@1 00 07 18
58@1@3 00 14 56
58@1@4 00 15 14
58@2 00 03 44
59 00 31 43
60@1c 00 27 46
60@2@v 00 01 73
61@3c 00 04 10
/kke.kxkao 117 00 02 58
116 00 12 09
114 00 00 20
115@1 00 14 96
115@2 00 15 67
99 00 33 03
98 00 19 90
100@1 00 04 03
94@v@2 00 40 47
94@v@1 00 19 74
94@c 00 05 75
93 00 00 20
86@1 00 11 26
87 00 17 01
88@1@1 00 10 11
88@1@2 00 04 11
69@1 00 14 61
69@1@1 00 00 05
68@v 00 14 44
68@v@1 00 15 19
68@c@1 00 17 53
vanjlqy 861@1 00 00 28
862@1 00 11 58
862@2 00 14 44
862@3@2 00 17 72
863@1 00 00 35
863@2 00 16 45
863@3 00 12 86
863@4 00 10 05
864@2 00 28 68
870 00 09 17
869@1@1 00 00 77
869@1@2 00 02 33
867@1 00 30 45
867@2 00 21 00
866 00 02 97
824@1 00 42 82
823@1@1 00 02 34
823@1@2 00 11 36
823@1@3 00 16 18
823@2 00 09 32
822@2c@2@1 00 09 51
822@2c@2@2 00 05 53
822@1v@2$822@1c@2 00 15 46
749@1 00 06 02
749@2 00 20 97
754 00 19 87
753@1 00 12 92
753@2 00 18 93
753@3 00 03 56
752 00 34 37
743@2 00 13 66
756@1 00 05 37
757@1 00 02 70
720@1 00 17 19
720@2 00 28 26
721@2 00 01 57
724@2 00 28 06
724@5 00 10 50
723@1 00 21 43
723@3 00 23 16
723@5 00 03 66
624@1@v 00 21 35
624@3 00 13 96
624@4@1 00 12 85
623@1 00 31 66
623@2 00 31 94
589@5 00 02 25
589@6 00 32 59
588@1v@2@1 00 09 41
588@1v@2@2 00 10 86
588@1c@1 00 28 47
587@2 00 22 94
582@2 00 03 71
583@1 00 12 30
583@2 00 12 30
586@8 00 31 81
585@1@1 00 26 35
585@1@2 00 13 20
585@1@3 00 05 82
480@2 00 25 27
481@1 00 15 82
482@1@1 00 15 48
482@1@2 00 14 86
482@2 00 12 40
529 00 49 25
528 00 07 11
526@2 00 01 67
527@1 00 22 74
527@4 00 27 35
524 00 13 04
523 00 07 91
522 00 06 76
521 00 33 56
520 00 09 52
519 00 00 64
517@1 00 10 38
518 00 00 20
cksdVs 200@2 00 20 24
198@1@c 00 20 16
197@4¼197@4@5@6½ 00 20 38
197@5¼197@4@5@6½ 00 21 11
196@5 00 20 60
196@6 00 06 21
177@3 00 35 93
177@5 00 05 37
129@1] 2] 3] 4 00 40 62
128@3 00 12 30
128@4 00 14 70
132@1 00 21 39
132@2 00 19 15
132@3 00 20 86
133@1@c 00 09 87
133@1@v@2 00 04 68
133@2 00 04 89
134 00 10 64
134@2 00 05 65
135 00 08 46
136 00 09 14
137 00 09 48
71@1 00 02 74
70 00 33 23
69 00 18 55
69@2 00 04 94
67 00 17 26
66 00 08 86
66@2 00 08 65
64 00 35 31
nqxyxkoa 143 00 05 35
142 00 00 49
141 00 13 59
148 00 09 41
138@1 00 11 71
137 00 07 38
151 00 35 11
152 00 15 73
35 00 12 03
36 00 03 28
34@1 00 28 58
32 00 44 11
33@c 00 00 20
31@1] 2 00 09 17
3793 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3794 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3795 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3796 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3797 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3798 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3799 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3800 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3801 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3802 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओआर-I/ई-23678]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 4th May, 2018

S.O. 803.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide S.O. No. 2219 dated the 14th September, 2017, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Published in the Gazette of India dated the 17th September-23rd September 2017, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Yeola in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 4th January 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Yeola District:- Nashik State :- Maharashtra
Mouja / Village Survey/Block No. Sub-Div-No. Area
Hectare are Sq. Mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Vasantnagar 21/1 00 23 71
21/2 00 17 07
18/1 00 01 72
22/1 00 00 20
25/1 00 00 48
25/2 00 36 27
24 00 06 56
26 00 35 32
27/1 00 00 25
27/2 00 26 93
27/3 00 27 07
14/2 00 58 36
13/1 00 56 50
13/2 00 36 00
31 00 55 26
32 00 10 60
33/1 00 31 14
33/2 00 16 59
33/3 00 13 09
33/4 00 16 14
1 00 79 52
4 00 74 03
Kusmadi 433 Paiky 00 25 76
400 00 23 42
399 00 23 42
394 00 26 49
393 00 17 68
391 00 10 43
390/2 00 06 67
390/3 00 05 07
389 00 07 99
387 00 08 45
385 00 29 30
382 00 00 20
374 00 31 16
373 00 00 71
368 00 04 33
367 00 09 89
363 00 22 68
364 00 25 37
362 00 00 35
359 00 16 29
Dhamode 72 00 25 00
77 00 03 45
78/1 00 12 55
79/1 00 06 70
79/2/B 00 06 72
82/2 00 05 82
84 00 08 41
87 00 09 31
89/1/A 00 08 21
89/1/B 00 08 80
90/2 00 30 78
91/1 00 20 86
91/2 00 30 07
94/1 00 23 37
94/2/2/B 00 06 33
94/2/3/K 00 06 00
94/2/4/D 00 05 22
94/2/5/E 00 05 22
112 00 05 45
145 00 01 69
144 00 05 48
131 00 12 29
130 00 11 75
227/1/A 00 11 27
230 00 14 24
229 00 09 33
228 00 29 36
237 00 13 32
236 00 15 28
333 00 30 29
255/1 00 17 51
255/2 00 03 89
268 00 14 57
269 00 00 20
329 00 32 31
328/1 00 13 37
328/2 00 15 98
328/3 00 22 19
319/2 00 06 64
279 00 01 37
280 00 15 71
281 00 11 09
282 00 07 13
288 00 33 28
289 00 13 64
316/1/A 00 15 99
316/2/B 00 12 82
316/2 00 15 75
293 00 04 70
315/1 00 00 20
294 00 15 64
295 00 12 33
296 00 07 35
297 00 06 96
298 00 07 39
300/1 00 04 34
299 00 41 93
Ganeshpur 48 00 15 49
49 00 01 68
Nagarsul 1046/1 00 09 98
1045 00 30 85
1043 00 23 02
1042 00 10 93
1041 00 05 58
1040 00 06 51
1039 00 04 16
1038 00 12 49
Matulthan 243/2 00 10 03
243/3 00 01 88
243/5 00 09 40
243/6 00 27 02
247/1 00 10 49
247/2 00 19 05
250/1 00 03 55
250/2 00 12 19
251/A 00 08 45
251/B 00 03 54
253 00 02 77
240 00 26 07
239 00 11 75
237 00 13 63
236/1 00 02 58
256/A 00 22 45
228 00 53 24
227/2/2 00 04 64
212 00 01 40
210/1 00 06 03
210/2 00 21 30
211 00 12 02
214 00 02 07
213 00 09 49
214P 00 11 15
221 00 22 75
173 00 09 42
160 00 00 91
162/1 00 17 02
161 00 12 01
159/A 00 04 09
159/D 00 39 99
159/F 00 10 27
159/J 00 04 84
158/1 00 11 85
153 00 08 45
152/2 00 13 69
152/3 00 15 96
Balhegaon 17/1 00 03 14
18 00 46 88
20/1B 00 02 02
20/1C/1 00 25 77
20/1C/2 00 11 11
20/2B 00 12 53
51/1B 00 00 54
50/1/1A 00 08 16
50/1/1B 00 09 19
50/1/3/2 00 09 61
50/1/2 00 10 12
48/1 00 18 59
48/3 00 14 80
46/3A 00 12 91
47/1A 00 13 18
47/1B 00 15 72
47/2 00 06 72
43/1A 00 21 98
43/1B 00 02 49
43/2B 00 22 28
55/2/1 00 01 72
42/1 00 00 44
56//1/2/A 00 31 40
56/1/2/B/2 00 19 81
56/1/2/B/1 00 07 18
58/1/3 00 14 56
58/1/4 00 15 14
58/2 00 03 44
59 00 31 43
60/1B 00 27 46
60/2/A 00 01 73
61/3B 00 04 10
Dhamangaon 117 00 02 58
116 00 12 09
114 00 00 20
115/1 00 14 96
115/2 00 15 67
99 00 33 03
98 00 19 90
100/1 00 04 03
94/A/2 00 40 47
94/A/1 00 19 74
94/B 00 05 75
93 00 00 20
86/1 00 11 26
87 00 17 01
88/1/1 00 10 11
88/1/2 00 04 11
69/1 00 14 61
69/1/1 00 00 05
68/A 00 14 44
68/A/1 00 15 19
68/B/1 00 17 53
Andarsul 861/1 00 00 28
862/1 00 11 58
862/2 00 14 44
862/3/2 00 17 72
863/1 00 00 35
863/2 00 16 45
863/3 00 12 86
863/4 00 10 05
864/2 00 28 68
870 00 09 17
869/1/1 00 00 77
869/1/2 00 02 33
867/1 00 30 45
867/2 00 21 00
866 00 02 97
824/1 00 42 82
823/1/1 00 02 34
823/1/2 00 11 36
823/1/3 00 16 18
823/2 00 09 32
822/2B/2/1 00 09 51
822/2B/2/2 00 05 53
822/1B/2+822/1B/2 00 15 46
749/1 00 06 02
749/2 00 20 97
754 00 19 87
753/1 00 12 92
753/2 00 18 93
753/3 00 03 56
752 00 34 37
743/2 00 13 66
756/1 00 05 37
757/1 00 02 70
720/1 00 17 19
720/2 00 28 26
721/2 00 01 57
724/2 00 28 06
724/5 00 10 50
723/1 00 21 43
723/3 00 23 16
723/5 00 03 66
624/1/A 00 21 35
624/3 00 13 96
624/4/1 00 12 85
623/1 00 31 66
623/2 00 31 94
589/5 00 02 25
589/6 00 32 59
588/1A/2/1 00 09 41
588/1A/2/2 00 10 86
588/1B/1 00 28 47
587/2 00 22 94
582/2 00 03 71
583/1 00 12 30
583/2 00 12 30
586/8 00 31 81
585/1/1 00 26 35
585/1/2 00 13 20
585/1/3 00 05 82
480/2 00 25 27
481/1 00 15 82
482/1/1 00 15 48
482/1/2 00 14 86
482/2 00 12 40
529 00 49 25
528 00 07 11
526/2 00 01 67
527/1 00 22 74
527/4 00 27 35
524 00 13 04
523 00 07 91
522 00 06 76
521 00 33 56
520 00 09 52
519 00 00 64
517/1 00 10 38
518 00 00 20
Bokate 200/2 00 20 24
198/1/B 00 20 16
197/4(197/4/5/6) 00 20 38
197/5(197/4/5/6) 00 21 11
196/5 00 20 60
196/6 00 06 21
177/3 00 35 93
177/5 00 05 37
129/1, 2, 3, 4 00 40 62
128/3 00 12 30
128/4 00 14 70
132/1 00 21 39
132/2 00 19 15
132/3 00 20 86
133/1/B 00 09 87
133/1/A/2 00 04 68
133/2 00 04 89
134 00 10 64
134/2 00 05 65
135 00 08 46
136 00 09 14
137 00 09 48
71/1 00 02 74
70 00 33 23
69 00 18 55
69/2 00 04 94
67 00 17 26
66 00 08 86
66/2 00 08 65
64 00 35 31
Dugalgaon 143 00 05 35
142 00 00 49
141 00 13 59
148 00 09 41
138/1 00 11 71
137 00 07 38
151 00 35 11
152 00 15 73
35 00 12 03
36 00 03 28
34/1 00 28 58
32 00 44 11
33/B 00 00 20
31/1, 2 00 09 17
3803 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3804 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3805 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3806 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3807 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3808 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3809 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3810 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3811 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 804804804804....————कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि तेलंगाना राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के qियान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूिम में जो इस से उपाबV अनुसूची में वXणत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी (cid:133)क्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वXणत भूमि में हितबV है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इ(cid:135)ीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के3812 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड

(पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कै नरा बैंक के ऊपर, मार्ग संख्या

10, जुबिली हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राज्य को लिखित रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा ।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला: यादा(cid:12)ी भुवनगिरि

राज्य: तेलंगाना

मंडल का नाम nाम का नाम सवx नम्बर क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
बी. पोचमपल्ली जिब्लक पल्लि 167/1 00 10 85
168 00 25 72
169 00 29 08
176 00 20 77
226 00 54 59
रामन्नपेट एल्लन्कि 153 00 04 66

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 804.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip- Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

Name of Mandal Name of Village Survey No. Area
Hectare Are Square Metre
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
B. Pochampally Jiblak Palle 167/1 00 10 85
168 00 25 72
169 00 29 08
176 00 20 77
226 00 54 59
Ramannapet Yellanki 153 00 04 66
3813 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 805805805805....————कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि तेलंगाना राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के qियान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूिम में जो इस से उपाबV अनुसूची में वXणत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी (cid:133)क्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वXणत भूमि में हितबV है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इ(cid:135)ीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कै नरा बैंक के ऊपर, मार्ग संख्या 10, जुबिली हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राज्य को लिखित रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा ।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला: नलगोंडा राज्य: तेलंगाना
मंडल का नाम nाम का नाम सवx नम्बर क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
क े तेपल्ली भीमारम 53 00 18 16
क े तेपल्ली तु ंगतुXत 147/27 00 14 57
147/4 00 04 38
12 00 59 60
19 00 34 32
20 00 50 21
क े तेपल्ली चेAकु पल्ली 682 00 19 16
683 00 47 18
472 00 18 14
473 00 06 55
474 00 13 69
488 00 05 54
489 00 02 69
487 00 08 99
486 00 15 91
485 00 16 02
484 00 19 82
419 00 17 46
नकिरेकल मर्रू र 299 00 00 04
300 00 01 11
नाकx टपल्ली नेम्मनि 136 00 32 81
3814 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 805.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip- Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

District : Nalgonda State : Telangana
Name of Mandal Name of Village Survey No. Area
Hectare Are Square Metre
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Kethepally Bheemaram 53 00 18 16
Kethepally Thungathurthy 147/27 00 14 57
147/4 00 04 38
12 00 59 60
19 00 34 32
20 00 50 21
Kethepally Cherkupally 682 00 19 16
683 00 47 18
472 00 18 14
473 00 06 55
474 00 13 69
488 00 05 54
489 00 02 69
487 00 08 99
486 00 15 91
485 00 16 02
484 00 19 82
419 00 17 46
Nakrekal Marrur 299 00 00 04
300 00 01 11
Narketpally Nemmani 136 00 32 81
3815 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 806806806806....————कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि तेलंगाना राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के qियान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूिम में जो इस से ऊपाबV अनुसूची में वXणत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी (cid:133)क्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वXणत भूमि में हितबV है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इ(cid:135)ीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कै नरा बैंक के ऊपर, मार्ग संख्या 10, जुबिली हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राज्य को लिखित रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा|3816 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

जिला : खम्मम राज्य : तेलंगाना
मंडल का नाम nाम का नाम सवx नम्बर क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
मिधरा चिलकु A 41 00 46 64
मिधरा रायापनम 342 00 37 52

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 806.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip- Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

District : Khammam State : Telangana
Name of Mandal Name of Village Survey No. Area
Hectare Are Square Metre
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Madhira Chilkuru 41 00 46 64
Madhira Rayapatnam 342 00 37 52

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 807807807807....————कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि तेलंगाना राज्य में पेट्रोलियम

उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के qियान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा

पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

3817 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940

और कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूिम में जो इस से उपाबV अनुसूची में वXणत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी (cid:133)क्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वXणत भूमि में हितबV है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इ(cid:135)ीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में 0ी एम. नारायणा राव, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (तेलंगाना), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 264/ए, दूसरी मंिजल, कै नरा बैंक के ऊपर, मार्ग संख्या 10, जुबिली हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500033, तेलंगाना राज्य को लिखित रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा ।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला: सुर्यापेट

राज्य: तेलंगाना

मंडल का नाम nाम का नाम सवx नम्बर क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
चिलुकू A चिलुकू A 201 00 00 53
127 00 01 55
377 00 07 97
मुनगाला गणपवरम 169/5 00 00 17
पेन्पहाड़ पेन्पहाड़ 94/26 00 04 09

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/3/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21839]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 807.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the State of Telangana a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip- Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. M. Narayana Rao, Competent Authority (Telangana), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 264/A, 2nd Floor, above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

3818 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

Name of Mandal Name of Village Survey No. Area
Hectare Are Square Metre
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Chilkur Chilkur 201 00 00 53
127 00 01 55
377 00 07 97
Munagala Ganapavaram 169/5 00 00 17
Penpahad Penpahad 94/26 00 04 09

[F. No. R-11025(11)/3/2018-OR-I/E-21839] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 808808808808....———— के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:140)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) भारत के राजपत्र, (असाधारण) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना का. आ 563(अ), तारीख 15 फरवरी 2017, द्वारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में एन्नोर - तिAवल्लूर - बेंगलुA - पांिडचेरी - नागप(िcid:141)नम - मदुरै - टूटिकोरिन पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल काप@रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 01.03.2017 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थL।

और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।

और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:140)ात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:142) अनुसूची में विनिuदष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए।

अत: अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा(1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना के संल(cid:142) अनुसूची में विनिuदष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अXजत किया जाता है।

यह और कि के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा(4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते (cid:17)ए यह निदxश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाश की तारीख से के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त हो कर इंडियन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।

पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूXत के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप@रेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उत्तरदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सम्बन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार के विAV कोई वाद, दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहL हो सके गी।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला : रामनाथपुरम राज्य : तिमलनाडु
तालुका का नाम गाँव का नाम सवxक्षण सं. उप ख^ड सं. क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
1 2 3 4 5 6
कडलाड़ी 40 कीरंदै 251 18 00 03 70
251 19 00 03 00
251 17 00 10 30
251 9बी 00 06 90
251 10 00 01 25
251 15ए1 00 04 90
251 15ए2 00 00 40
251 11 00 05 60
256 7ए 00 02 70
256 5 00 06 95
256 10ए 00 00 40
256 1 00 05 00
258 3डी 00 04 35
258 3बी 00 02 70
258 3ए 00 01 00
258 2 00 03 45
258 1 00 02 90
259 9बी 00 00 90
259 10 00 07 60
259 7 00 02 95
259 5 00 03 90
259 3ए 00 06 30
259 3बी 00 04 60
265 6 00 03 60
265 7 00 00 40
265 5बी 00 06 80
265 5ए 00 09 55
265 1 00 02 00
270 1 00 00 40
266 2 00 13 00
266 3ए 00 00 40
266 4 00 01 60
266 5 00 05 50
266 6ए 00 01 40
266 7 00 01 20
266 1बी 00 02 45
266 1ए 00 06 00
267 2सी3 00 04 40
267 2सी2 00 06 15
267 2सी1 00 05 05
267 2ए 00 00 65
267 4 00 00 40
267 5 00 01 90
150 6ए 00 09 00
173 8ए 00 10 10
173 7ए 00 10 80
173 3सी 00 03 70
173 3डी 00 03 00
173 3ई 00 00 80
173 2बी 00 03 50
173 3जी 00 02 30
173 3एच 00 02 90
173 3आई 00 03 60
173 3जे 00 03 45
173 3के 00 02 90
173 3एल 00 03 40
172 5सी4 00 02 70
172 5बी 00 00 40
172 9 00 06 70
172 7 00 11 85
172 6ए 00 02 25
172 6बी 00 10 00
158 1 00 01 20
170 5बी 00 06 50
159 2बी 00 02 80
159 2ए 00 04 35
159 1सी 00 17 20
159 1बी 00 01 35
166 10ए1ए 00 06 40
166 10ए1बी 00 10 00
166 10ए1सी 00 00 90
166 7 00 08 30
166 8ए 00 09 70
104 1 00 00 60
104 2 00 13 65
104 3 00 01 25
78 7 00 10 45
103 3बी 00 12 25
103 3सी 00 03 10
103 2बी 00 06 80
105 1 00 01 45
102 1बी2 00 08 00
102 2 00 12 00
102 3 00 13 00
101 10 00 01 55
106 1डी 00 00 50
106 1सी 00 03 60
106 1बी 00 04 35
106 1ए 00 03 10
110 1ए 00 11 15
98 2बी 00 02 00
98 1ई 00 03 30
98 1एफ1 00 09 80
98 1एफ2 00 02 55
98 1एफ3 00 01 35
113 7बी 00 00 80
113 7ए 00 01 40
113 4 00 04 20
113 3सी 00 00 40
113 5 00 05 70
113 2 00 00 60
113 6 00 04 45
113 1सी2 00 07 35
113 1सी1 00 04 85
113 1बी 00 00 70
116 1 00 13 00
115 3 00 10 45
127 00 04 60
430 13 00 04 15
430 14 00 09 30
430 7 00 03 35
430 6 00 03 85
430 5 00 06 10
430 4 00 00 40
433 1 00 00 40
432 14 00 06 90
432 13 00 03 40
432 11 00 06 50
432 9 00 07 10
432 10 00 00 45
432 8 00 00 60
432 6 00 00 40
436 00 04 50
425 1 00 26 10
19 7 00 11 70
2 8 00 06 95
2 9 00 00 40
2 10 00 13 15
2 7 00 25 90
कडलाड़ी 23 वोरीवयल 252 00 32 60
253 1 00 06 80
248 2 00 20 50
248 1 00 14 00
249 1 00 16 75
158 2 00 00 40
158 1 00 13 25
154 1सी 00 01 30
154 1बी 00 04 45
154 1ए 00 09 75
153 3 00 20 90
153 1 00 00 50
153 2 00 27 00
151 4 00 09 20
151 3 00 09 55
150 5 00 14 95
150 2 00 11 60
149 4 00 16 70
149 1 00 04 50
148 00 07 20
147 2 00 06 70
147 1 00 07 00
146 2 00 07 60
146 1 00 06 90
145 2 00 13 70
24 3 00 05 45
24 24 00 01 00
24 2सी4 00 03 70
24 23 00 00 40
24 2सी3 00 06 40
24 2सी2 00 06 75
24 2बी3 00 02 40
24 2बी2 00 04 15
24 2बी1 00 04 85
24 19 00 08 80
24 18 00 04 60
24 17 00 07 20
24 2ए2 00 05 20
24 2ए1 00 09 00
23 2 00 10 90
22 3ई 00 05 40
22 3एफ 00 03 20
21 2बी2 00 00 45
21 2बी1 00 02 25
21 2ए2 00 03 00
21 2ए3 00 04 20
21 2ए1 00 06 85
21 3ए 00 00 65
21 1ए 00 05 75
कडलाड़ी 22 मारंदै 380 00 07 55
382 3बी 00 03 70
382 4बी 00 12 85
382 4ए 00 19 50
382 5 00 00 40
383 1बी 00 08 65
383 1ए 00 08 65
384 2बी 00 09 25
384 2ए 00 02 50
384 3 00 18 35
384 4 00 07 95
385 3बी 00 11 15
385 2 00 00 40
385 4 00 02 50
385 5 00 13 05
385 6 00 00 65
386 6 00 08 45
386 5बी 00 00 40
386 5सी 00 06 50
386 5डी 00 00 60
386 4बी 00 06 15
387 3बी 00 15 50
387 3ए 00 02 00
387 2बी 00 01 00
387 2ए 00 18 10
387 1 00 15 50
388 1ए 00 11 90
388 2ए 00 12 60
389 1 00 12 25
389 2 00 11 90
356 2 00 03 20
356 1 00 10 30
356 4ए 00 11 70
356 4सी 00 05 25
355 4 00 22 75
355 3डी 00 01 90
355 3ई 00 04 90
352 5 00 05 80
352 4बी 00 13 45
352 4ए 00 04 50
352 3 00 07 60
352 2बी 00 04 15
352 2ए 00 04 00
351 5 00 08 30
351 4सी 00 15 30
351 3एच 00 03 00
351 3आई 00 01 10
351 3जे 00 00 40
351 2ई 00 03 40
351 2डी 00 01 65
351 2सी 00 00 40
350 10 00 21 60
कडलाड़ी 21 पुनवासल 236 2ए 00 19 30
237 1 00 05 85
237 3बी 00 02 90
237 3ए 00 09 75
378 3 00 09 00
378 4ए 00 02 10
234 4बी1 00 00 60
234 4बी2 00 01 35
377 1डी 00 03 20
377 1ई 00 03 60
377 3ए3 00 09 50
375 1 00 02 55
374 1ए 00 07 30
374 3एफ 00 09 20
374 2ए 00 04 50
374 2बी 00 03 90
374 3आई 00 04 75
374 3जे 00 01 00
374 4सी 00 03 70
374 5ए 00 03 70
374 5बी 00 04 60
372 1 00 01 85
372 2 00 00 90
372 3 00 05 00
371 1ए 00 05 15
371 2ए 00 05 00
371 2बी2 00 02 30
371 3ए 00 06 55
371 3बी 00 06 15
370 1बी 00 07 20
370 2ए 00 03 10
370 2बी 00 01 45
368 1 00 07 40
368 3 00 08 85
367 1बी1 00 11 40
367 2 00 03 70
366 1 00 00 40
366 2 00 01 50
366 3 00 02 80
366 4 00 04 20
366 5ए 00 04 20
366 6ए 00 02 40
366 5सी 00 06 20
366 5डी 00 07 45
421 1ए 00 22 60
421 1डी1 00 03 65
421 1बी2 00 20 45
424 4 00 03 65
425 1 00 04 75
425 2 00 03 30
427 1 00 01 60
427 2 00 01 60
427 3ए 00 02 15
427 3बी 00 03 90
427 4ए 00 03 70
427 4बी 00 03 90
426 1ए 00 02 35
428 1 00 06 30
428 2 00 06 30
428 3 00 09 15
428 5 00 12 55
430 2ए 00 02 85
431 2 00 04 20
433 1ए 00 01 60
433 1बी 00 02 40
433 1सी 00 02 75
433 2 00 04 80
433 3 00 00 75
433 4ए 00 02 75
433 4बी1 00 01 75
433 4बी2 00 01 75
438 1ए1 00 06 60
438 1बी1 00 01 60
438 1बी2 00 04 60
438 2बी 00 06 75
438 3ए 00 11 90
439 1ए 00 33 60
कडलाड़ी 18 के वेप्पनकु लम 70 3 00 04 50
70 6 00 23 60
70 4 00 00 40
70 2 00 08 90
70 1 00 07 00
73 6ई 00 00 40
73 6एफ 00 01 50
73 6जी 00 03 80
73 1एच 00 00 40
74 3 00 00 80
74 2 00 04 00
74 4 00 25 00
77 3ए1 00 06 55
77 3ए2 00 09 10
77 2सी 00 00 40
77 2बी 00 02 00
77 2ए 00 11 20
131 4ए 00 06 35
134 2डी 00 00 40
134 2एफ 00 08 10
134 3 00 03 00
135 5 00 15 60
135 3ए 00 03 55
135 7बी 00 05 95
136 2ए 00 01 25
136 2बी 00 06 30
136 7सी 00 05 35
136 3बी 00 11 20
136 6 00 03 20
144 3 00 04 30
144 7ए 00 07 15
144 4बी 00 03 50
144 4ए 00 06 80
155 3बी 00 06 35
155 3सी 00 02 55
155 4ए 00 01 50
155 4बी 00 00 40
158 1ए4 00 04 30
158 2 00 01 30
158 3 00 06 35
158 6ए 00 03 70
158 7ए1 00 05 80
158 1ए6 00 02 00
158 6बी 00 03 00
158 4बी 00 02 10
158 1ए5 00 01 00
160 1बी 00 03 75
160 33 00 06 15
160 1डी 00 06 55
160 1ए 00 00 95
160 1सी 00 05 10
161 2ए2 00 08 00
164 1 00 03 60
164 2ए1 00 24 40
164 4 00 00 65
165 3एच 00 07 00
179 3 00 04 00
179 2 00 05 85
179 4बी1 00 03 90
180 4ए1 00 04 60
180 4ए2 00 06 10
181 7बी 00 05 65
186 2 00 13 70
186 3 00 01 65
186 4 00 10 90
190 1 00 09 35
190 2 00 11 10
191 6ए2 00 04 30
191 7ए 00 00 40
191 5बी 00 01 50
191 6ए1 00 05 90
200 4 00 00 40
200 6 00 00 40
200 5 00 03 50
200 7ए 00 00 95
200 8 00 12 10
कडलाड़ी 19 आप्पनूर 319 1ए 00 16 20
319 1बी 00 10 35
319 2 00 05 20
339 1 00 08 60
340 1 00 01 65
340 2 00 24 45
340 4 00 09 00
344 3 00 22 00
344 2 00 06 40
351 3सी 00 09 90
351 1ए 00 11 00
350 2बी 00 20 00
350 2ए 00 00 40
350 3 00 27 75
358 1ए 00 08 70
348 5बी 00 04 00
348 5ए 00 04 00
348 4बी 00 06 75
348 4ए 00 07 00
348 3बी 00 00 65
359 3बी 00 05 25
359 3ए 00 05 30
कडलाड़ी 17 मरवर करिसलकु लम 297 2 00 33 50
295 2बी 00 13 00
295 2ए 00 07 10
294 2 00 07 60
301 1 00 01 30
293 2 00 28 75
303 2 00 06 80
303 3बी 00 13 00
303 4 00 16 65
311 1बी 00 00 40
311 1ए 00 07 40
304 2 00 15 15
304 1बी2 00 06 00
304 1बी1 00 07 00
304 1ए4 00 00 40
308 1 00 11 55
308 2 00 11 15
284 3 00 05 10
283 1ए1 00 04 70
283 1ए2 00 04 35
283 1ए3 00 05 05
283 1ए4 00 04 00
283 1ए5 00 01 50
283 1ए6 00 00 40
282 2बी 00 04 85
282 1बी 00 09 55
282 1ए 00 03 00
277 1ए 00 00 90
281 2सी 00 00 65
280 3 00 11 00
280 2 00 09 75
280 1ए2 00 00 40
280 1ए3 00 08 10
280 1बी 00 03 60
176 2 00 10 80
175 14बी 00 01 65
175 14ए 00 00 40
175 14सी 00 06 60
175 13 00 07 40
180 5बी 00 09 60
177 3बी 00 04 85
177 3ए 00 07 75
177 1ए 00 00 50
177 1बी 00 10 70
178 10ए 00 08 30
178 9बी 00 00 40
178 8 00 08 25
178 2 00 00 95
178 3 00 07 70
178 1 00 07 20
199 2 00 10 65
200 3 00 18 90
200 2 00 13 90
200 1बी 00 06 00
200 1ए2 00 06 85
201 3 00 09 30
201 2 00 09 35
201 1 00 13 15
138 1 00 06 85
139 2सी 00 00 40
139 3ए 00 11 65
139 3बी 00 25 55
132 3ए 00 01 75
132 1ए 00 02 80
131 16 00 02 40
131 14बी 00 03 40
131 14ए 00 03 80
131 13 00 07 20
131 12ए 00 03 40
131 12बी 00 05 50
131 1बी 00 01 50
131 1ए 00 00 40
131 2बी 00 09 35
131 2ए 00 01 00
131 3 00 00 75
140 2सी 00 04 70
126 2सी 00 03 10
126 2डी 00 01 05
126 2बी1 00 02 35
126 2ए 00 02 20
126 3बी 00 04 05
126 3ए 00 02 70
126 4ए 00 12 00
126 4बी1 00 00 60
126 1 00 00 40
125 1एच 00 33 50
124 4बी2 00 00 50
124 5सी 00 02 75
124 5बी 00 02 75
124 5ए 00 03 00
124 2बी 00 04 95
124 6ए 00 03 75
124 1 00 03 15
109 17ए 00 00 75
109 19 00 01 20
109 17बी1 00 05 80
109 9बी 00 02 25
109 9सी 00 02 25
109 5सी 00 03 15
109 10 00 01 25
109 11 00 01 95
109 5बी 00 06 15
109 1बी 00 03 70
109 3 00 01 00
109 2 00 03 80
108 2सी2 00 03 00
108 2बी 00 02 15
108 2ए5 00 00 75
106 17ए2 00 00 40
106 17ए1 00 00 40
106 17बी 00 09 70
106 2 00 04 65
106 1सी 00 01 70
106 1डी 00 04 40
106 1बी 00 04 40
106 5 00 00 65
103 4बी 00 06 50
103 7 00 03 40
103 5बी 00 04 00
103 5सी 00 05 85
100 2 00 07 00
100 3बी 00 00 40
100 3ए 00 02 85
100 1बी 00 02 60
100 5ए1 00 06 15
100 5ए2 00 02 85
99 3 00 11 75
99 5 00 00 50
99 4डी 00 00 75
99 4ई 00 06 30
99 4ए 00 01 60
87 4 00 06 30
87 2सी 00 12 25
87 2ए 00 07 20
87 1 00 12 80
87 3ए 00 03 80
कडलाड़ी 15 एस वागैकु लम 6 1ए 00 31 80
6 2ए/2 00 00 65
6 2ए1 00 04 90
6 2सी 00 03 00
6 2डी 00 00 40
7 3बी 00 00 40
7 3सी 00 02 30
7 3डी 00 07 15
7 3ई 00 02 85
7 3जी 00 04 95
7 2ई 00 04 25
7 2ए 00 04 50
7 1एफ 00 04 45
7 1बी 00 00 40
7 1सी 00 03 55
7 1डी 00 00 95
5 2बी 00 05 10
5 2ए 00 03 85
5 3डी 00 00 40
4 3 00 17 40
3 7 00 24 55
3 2 00 20 50
3 1ए1बी 00 05 50
19 00 20 40
कडलाड़ी 3 अवत्तान्डै 81 2 00 31 50
88 00 00 45
90 3 00 01 20
90 5 00 07 00
91 2 00 18 50
91 1 00 18 75
92 2 00 03 45
92 1 00 16 60
95 2 00 02 00
95 1 00 07 25
96 3 00 11 55
96 1 00 25 65
97 16 00 00 40
183 10ए 00 10 00
183 10बी 00 05 10
183 3 00 04 25
183 7 00 00 40
186 8 00 05 10
186 6 00 01 40
186 1बी 00 06 50
186 7 00 00 60
186 10 00 04 50
187 5 00 00 40
187 6 00 04 50
187 3 00 04 75
187 7 00 02 10
190 1 00 06 50
191 12 00 02 00
191 9 00 03 00
191 10 00 08 70
191 8 00 00 40
191 13/बी 00 17 45
207 4 00 02 65
207 1 00 03 45
208 4 00 01 35
208 7 00 04 70
208 5 00 03 60
208 6 00 03 60
209 7 00 08 25
209 6 00 00 70
209 8 00 13 70
211 3 00 05 60
211 4 00 00 60
211 2 00 04 50
213 7 00 08 25
213 5 00 05 35
213 9 00 00 70
213 4 00 05 50
213 8 00 02 60
213 6 00 08 80
213 3सी 00 02 00
213 3डी 00 06 80
279 1 00 11 60
280 4 00 07 25
280 1 00 07 45
280 3 00 06 40
280 2 00 13 40
281 6 00 00 40
281 5बी2 00 00 55
282 1ए 00 19 40
282 1सी1 00 09 50
282 1बी 00 09 75
283 1 00 38 00
285 7 00 06 40
305 2 00 13 30
306 8 00 10 00
306 7 00 00 40
306 3 00 07 55
306 9 00 01 60
306 5 00 06 00
306 4 00 01 75
306 6 00 10 80
306 2 00 00 90
307 1 00 16 00
307 2 00 09 65
312 4बी 00 00 40
312 4ए 00 02 65
312 3 00 08 10
316 6बी 00 12 40
316 5 00 02 60
338 1 00 27 50
338 2ए 00 00 60
339 3 00 05 00
339 2 00 16 00
339 6 00 06 30
339 5 00 07 40
339 1बी 00 00 40
339 7ए 00 07 75
344 1 00 12 80
344 2 00 09 50
344 3 00 00 40
345 2 00 00 40
345 9 00 06 00
346 3 00 14 70
346 2 00 15 50
347 2 00 09 25
347 4ए 00 00 60
347 3बी 00 03 70
347 3ए 00 14 40
347 1 00 06 50
348 1 00 22 50
349 00 00 40
कडलाड़ी 4 ए नेडु ंकु लम 45 8 00 00 40
45 9 00 04 00
45 10 00 03 50
45 11 00 07 20
45 14 00 07 30
45 6ए 00 03 15
45 6बी 00 06 00
45 7ए 00 03 65
45 7बी 00 00 70
46 9 00 01 65
46 8ए 00 03 50
46 8बी 00 01 70
50 7 00 07 90
50 8 00 07 65
50 6ए 00 02 30
50 6बी 00 04 65
50 9ए 00 05 50
50 9बी 00 04 90
57 1 00 10 60
57 4 00 08 00
57 5 00 00 40
59 5 00 11 30
59 6ए 00 09 00
59 6बी 00 08 10
61 1 00 21 25
61 2 00 07 70
61 3 00 01 60
63 2 00 11 75
63 1ए 00 00 60
63 1बी 00 13 00
63 3बी 00 00 40
108 3 00 04 75
108 1ए 00 07 90
108 2ए 00 02 75
109 2 00 08 80
109 1ए 00 07 30
109 1बी 00 00 40
109 4ए 00 09 50
110 1बी 00 08 20
110 2बी 00 09 75
110 3बी 00 01 25
113 2ए 00 03 75
113 2बी 00 00 40
113 3डी 00 00 70
113 3ई 00 06 40
113 3एफ 00 01 10
114 3 00 03 10
114 4 00 04 10
114 6 00 03 00
114 11 00 01 20
114 1बी 00 04 85
114 1सी 00 06 80
114 7ए1 00 01 90
114 7ए2 00 06 80
115 1ए 00 01 00
115 1बी 00 01 00
116 5 00 04 00
116 6ए 00 01 00
116 6बी 00 04 40
116 8 00 08 40
116 9 00 11 10
116 11 00 01 15
116 4ए 00 03 70
116 4बी 00 04 70
120 15 00 08 90
130 11 00 23 50
132 7 00 04 90
132 2बी 00 04 60
132 8बी2 00 03 70
134 6बी 00 00 60
134 6डी 00 01 85
134 6ई 00 04 20
134 6एच 00 09 95
135 4 00 03 85
135 5 00 02 20
135 6 00 04 65
135 7 00 04 05
135 8 00 04 60
172 16 00 00 40
172 17 00 03 20
172 21 00 06 50
172 22 00 04 95
172 1सी 00 04 40
172 1डी 00 01 00
173 6 00 09 75
173 3ई 00 00 40
173 4बी 00 03 50
173 5बी1 00 00 45
173 5बी2 00 03 75
173 5सी 00 00 55
174 15 00 24 45
174 14सी 00 00 40
175 10 00 01 25
211 2 00 03 65
211 3बी 00 04 55
211 3सी 00 06 60
211 3डी 00 06 70
211 4ए 00 00 80
211 5ए 00 03 10
211 6ए 00 05 40
212 3 00 07 55
212 1सी 00 04 05
212 6बी1 00 02 20
212 6बी2 00 07 90
213 10 00 03 20
213 6ए 00 00 55
213 6बी 00 03 25
213 7ए 00 07 00
213 7बी 00 01 30
213 8ए 00 03 60
213 9ए 00 04 20
226 2 00 00 40
226 4 00 10 90
226 8 00 04 60
226 7ए 00 07 60
226 7बी 00 00 40
226 9बी1 00 02 70
226 9बी2 00 02 60
230 2 00 18 65
230 1ए4 00 10 00
230 1बी1 00 30 20
230 1बी2 00 08 00
231 2 00 11 30
231 3 00 05 40
231 1बी 00 00 40
231 1सी 00 04 90
231 1डी 00 05 80
231 1ई 00 03 40
234 00 01 25
कडलाड़ी 66 कोरसन कोै 464 3 00 04 35
453 1 00 00 80
457 1बी 00 03 45
457 1ए1 00 05 90
457 1ए2 00 06 25
457 2 00 29 40
452 2 00 14 75
450 2 00 00 40
450 1 00 20 90
449 5 00 05 60
449 7बी 00 00 40
449 4 00 05 55
449 7ए 00 04 70
449 3 00 13 70
449 2बी 00 00 40
447 7सी 00 00 40
448 2 00 07 95
448 1 00 05 80
448 4ए 00 03 75
448 4बी 00 04 75
448 4सी 00 04 55
448 4डी 00 05 50
433 8ए 00 08 85
433 8बी 00 00 85
433 7 00 09 15
433 2 00 09 10
433 1 00 00 45
430 1 00 03 70
430 3 00 25 60
कडलाड़ी 7 कोंडुनल्लानपी 105 7ए 00 00 40
105 6 00 04 90
106 5बी1 00 00 40
106 5बी2 00 07 40
106 4 00 08 65
106 3 00 06 50
118 2ए 00 18 90
118 2बी 00 03 50
118 4ए 00 08 70
118 5ए 00 02 90
118 1 00 03 55
118 3 00 01 10
124 3बी 00 13 50
127 4 00 01 10
127 1 00 00 45
127 2 00 25 90
127 3 00 08 30
132 2 00 07 20
132 1क्यू 00 06 00
134 1ए 00 23 65
137 5 00 29 60
140 2सी 00 16 20
140 2डी 00 05 30
140 2बी 00 02 30
140 3 00 07 70
212 5 00 06 65
212 4ए 00 00 65
212 6 00 05 90
212 4बी 00 05 00
212 3 00 06 00
212 1बी 00 09 70
212 1ए 00 02 90
212 2 00 02 10
214 3 00 12 60
214 1बी 00 09 45
214 4बी 00 00 40
214 2 00 10 80
214 4ए 00 09 10
219 6बी 00 01 10
220 1 00 25 10
220 2 00 11 70
220 4 00 02 30
220 3 00 12 80
221 1 00 01 65
221 3बी 00 06 70
221 3ए 00 07 10
229 1 00 11 60
230 2बी 00 13 70
230 2ए 00 12 00
231 3बी 00 06 25
231 2 00 01 30
231 3ए 00 11 60
232 1डी 00 00 40
232 3बी 00 20 70
232 1बी 00 14 50
232 1सी 00 08 80
233 2 00 11 00
324 4 00 00 70
326 3ए2 00 09 00
326 3ए1 00 06 50
326 3ए4 00 09 25
326 3ए3 00 08 85
326 3बी 00 22 05
332 2 00 11 00
333 3डी2 00 11 50
333 5बी 00 04 20
349 1ए1 00 15 70
350 1ए 00 16 85
350 1बी 00 00 40
350 1सी 00 09 80
350 2ए 00 02 10
351 2बी3 00 10 10
353 1 00 41 00
मुदुकु लत्तूर 8 मेल िसरपोतु 266 2ए 00 05 25
266 2बी 00 04 90
266 3ए 00 04 85
266 3बी 00 05 15
267 2ए 00 11 75
269 1ए 00 07 55
269 1बी 00 07 55
269 2ए 00 04 15
269 2बी 00 04 35
269 3ए 00 08 30
270 1बी 00 03 90
270 2ए 00 03 85
270 3सी 00 00 50
271 1ए 00 08 95
289 1ए 00 04 45
289 1बी 00 04 45
289 1सी 00 04 45
289 1डी 00 05 10
289 3ए 00 02 50
289 3बी 00 06 85
291 1ए 00 03 45
290 7 00 19 35
290 13ए 00 04 40
290 13बी 00 04 40
290 13सी 00 07 60
290 12बी 00 00 40
290 12सी 00 01 10
क ु मुदी 47 एम पुदुक्कु लम 1 12 00 02 80
1 13 00 07 90
3819 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3820 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3821 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3822 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3823 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3824 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3825 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3826 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3827 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3828 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3829 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3830 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3831 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3832 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3833 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3834 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3835 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3836 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3837 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3838 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3839 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3840 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3841 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3842 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 808.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 563(E) dated: 15.02.2017 issued under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the Lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Natural Gas, a pipeline "Ennore- Tiruvallur -Bengaluru -Pondicherry -Nagapattinam –Madurai- Tuticorin" should be laid in the State of Tamil Nadu by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public from 01.03.2017.

And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User in the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the said Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P & M P Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to pipeline.

SCHEDULE

District : Ramanathapuram State : Tamil Nadu
Name of the Taluk Name of the Village Survey No. Sub Division No. Area
Hectare Are Square Meter
1 2 3 4 5 6
Kadaladi 40 Keerandai 251 18 00 03 70
251 19 00 03 00
251 17 00 10 30
251 9B 00 06 90
251 10 00 01 25
251 15A1 00 04 90
251 15A2 00 00 40
251 11 00 05 60
256 7A 00 02 70
256 5 00 06 95
256 10A 00 00 40
256 1 00 05 00
258 3D 00 04 35
258 3B 00 02 70
258 3A 00 01 00
258 2 00 03 45
258 1 00 02 90
259 9B 00 00 90
259 10 00 07 60
259 7 00 02 95
259 5 00 03 90
259 3A 00 06 30
259 3B 00 04 60
265 6 00 03 60
265 7 00 00 40
265 5B 00 06 80
265 5A 00 09 55
265 1 00 02 00
270 1 00 00 40
266 2 00 13 00
266 3A 00 00 40
266 4 00 01 60
266 5 00 05 50
266 6A 00 01 40
266 7 00 01 20
266 1B 00 02 45
266 1A 00 06 00
267 2C3 00 04 40
267 2C2 00 06 15
267 2C1 00 05 05
267 2A 00 00 65
267 4 00 00 40
267 5 00 01 90
150 6A 00 09 00
173 8A 00 10 10
173 7A 00 10 80
173 3C 00 03 70
173 3D 00 03 00
173 3E 00 00 80
173 2B 00 03 50
173 3G 00 02 30
173 3H 00 02 90
173 3I 00 03 60
173 3J 00 03 45
173 3K 00 02 90
173 3L 00 03 40
172 5C4 00 02 70
172 5B 00 00 40
172 9 00 06 70
172 7 00 11 85
172 6A 00 02 25
172 6B 00 10 00
158 1 00 01 20
170 5B 00 06 50
159 2B 00 02 80
159 2A 00 04 35
159 1C 00 17 20
159 1B 00 01 35
166 10A1A 00 06 40
166 10A1B 00 10 00
166 10A1C 00 00 90
166 7 00 08 30
166 8A 00 09 70
104 1 00 00 60
104 2 00 13 65
104 3 00 01 25
78 7 00 10 45
103 3B 00 12 25
103 3C 00 03 10
103 2B 00 06 80
105 1 00 01 45
102 1B2 00 08 00
102 2 00 12 00
102 3 00 13 00
101 10 00 01 55
106 1D 00 00 50
106 1C 00 03 60
106 1B 00 04 35
106 1A 00 03 10
110 1A 00 11 15
98 2B 00 02 00
98 1E 00 03 30
98 1F1 00 09 80
98 1F2 00 02 55
98 1F3 00 01 35
113 7B 00 00 80
113 7A 00 01 40
113 4 00 04 20
113 3C 00 00 40
113 5 00 05 70
113 2 00 00 60
113 6 00 04 45
113 1C2 00 07 35
113 1C1 00 04 85
113 1B 00 00 70
116 1 00 13 00
115 3 00 10 45
127 00 04 60
430 13 00 04 15
430 14 00 09 30
430 7 00 03 35
430 6 00 03 85
430 5 00 06 10
430 4 00 00 40
433 1 00 00 40
432 14 00 06 90
432 13 00 03 40
432 11 00 06 50
432 9 00 07 10
432 10 00 00 45
432 8 00 00 60
432 6 00 00 40
436 00 04 50
425 1 00 26 10
19 7 00 11 70
2 8 00 06 95
2 9 00 00 40
2 10 00 13 15
2 7 00 25 90
Kadaladi 23 Orivayal 252 00 32 60
253 1 00 06 80
248 2 00 20 50
248 1 00 14 00
249 1 00 16 75
158 2 00 00 40
158 1 00 13 25
154 1C 00 01 30
154 1B 00 04 45
154 1A 00 09 75
153 3 00 20 90
153 1 00 00 50
153 2 00 27 00
151 4 00 09 20
151 3 00 09 55
150 5 00 14 95
150 2 00 11 60
149 4 00 16 70
149 1 00 04 50
148 00 07 20
147 2 00 06 70
147 1 00 07 00
146 2 00 07 60
146 1 00 06 90
145 2 00 13 70
24 3 00 05 45
24 24 00 01 00
24 2C4 00 03 70
24 23 00 00 40
24 2C3 00 06 40
24 2C2 00 06 75
24 2B3 00 02 40
24 2B2 00 04 15
24 2B1 00 04 85
24 19 00 08 80
24 18 00 04 60
24 17 00 07 20
24 2A2 00 05 20
24 2A1 00 09 00
23 2 00 10 90
22 3E 00 05 40
22 3F 00 03 20
21 2B2 00 00 45
21 2B1 00 02 25
21 2A2 00 03 00
21 2A3 00 04 20
21 2A1 00 06 85
21 3A 00 00 65
21 1A 00 05 75
Kadaladi 22 Marandai 380 00 07 55
382 3B 00 03 70
382 4B 00 12 85
382 4A 00 19 50
382 5 00 00 40
383 1B 00 08 65
383 1A 00 08 65
384 2B 00 09 25
384 2A 00 02 50
384 3 00 18 35
384 4 00 07 95
385 3B 00 11 15
385 2 00 00 40
385 4 00 02 50
385 5 00 13 05
385 6 00 00 65
386 6 00 08 45
386 5B 00 00 40
386 5C 00 06 50
386 5D 00 00 60
386 4B 00 06 15
387 3B 00 15 50
387 3A 00 02 00
387 2B 00 01 00
387 2A 00 18 10
387 1 00 15 50
388 1A 00 11 90
388 2A 00 12 60
389 1 00 12 25
389 2 00 11 90
356 2 00 03 20
356 1 00 10 30
356 4A 00 11 70
356 4C 00 05 25
355 4 00 22 75
355 3D 00 01 90
355 3E 00 04 90
352 5 00 05 80
352 4B 00 13 45
352 4A 00 04 50
352 3 00 07 60
352 2B 00 04 15
352 2A 00 04 00
351 5 00 08 30
351 4C 00 15 30
351 3H 00 03 00
351 3I 00 01 10
351 3J 00 00 40
351 2E 00 03 40
351 2D 00 01 65
351 2C 00 00 40
350 10 00 21 60
Kadaladi 21 Punavasal 236 2A 00 19 30
237 1 00 05 85
237 3B 00 02 90
237 3A 00 09 75
378 3 00 09 00
378 4A 00 02 10
234 4B1 00 00 60
234 4B2 00 01 35
377 1D 00 03 20
377 1E 00 03 60
377 3A3 00 09 50
375 1 00 02 55
374 1A 00 07 30
374 3F 00 09 20
374 2A 00 04 50
374 2B 00 03 90
374 3I 00 04 75
374 3J 00 01 00
374 4C 00 03 70
374 5A 00 03 70
374 5B 00 04 60
372 1 00 01 85
372 2 00 00 90
372 3 00 05 00
371 1A 00 05 15
371 2A 00 05 00
371 2B2 00 02 30
371 3A 00 06 55
371 3B 00 06 15
370 1B 00 07 20
370 2A 00 03 10
370 2B 00 01 45
368 1 00 07 40
368 3 00 08 85
367 1B1 00 11 40
367 2 00 03 70
366 1 00 00 40
366 2 00 01 50
366 3 00 02 80
366 4 00 04 20
366 5A 00 04 20
366 6A 00 02 40
366 5C 00 06 20
366 5D 00 07 45
421 1A 00 22 60
421 1D1 00 03 65
421 1B2 00 20 45
424 4 00 03 65
425 1 00 04 75
425 2 00 03 30
427 1 00 01 60
427 2 00 01 60
427 3A 00 02 15
427 3B 00 03 90
427 4A 00 03 70
427 4B 00 03 90
426 1A 00 02 35
428 1 00 06 30
428 2 00 06 30
428 3 00 09 15
428 5 00 12 55
430 2A 00 02 85
431 2 00 04 20
433 1A 00 01 60
433 1B 00 02 40
433 1C 00 02 75
433 2 00 04 80
433 3 00 00 75
433 4A 00 02 75
433 4B1 00 01 75
433 4B2 00 01 75
438 1A1 00 06 60
438 1B1 00 01 60
438 1B2 00 04 60
438 2B 00 06 75
438 3A 00 11 90
439 1A 00 33 60
Kadaladi 18 K Veppangulam 70 3 00 04 50
70 6 00 23 60
70 4 00 00 40
70 2 00 08 90
70 1 00 07 00
73 6E 00 00 40
73 6F 00 01 50
73 6G 00 03 80
73 1H 00 00 40
74 3 00 00 80
74 2 00 04 00
74 4 00 25 00
77 3A1 00 06 55
77 3A2 00 09 10
77 2C 00 00 40
77 2B 00 02 00
77 2A 00 11 20
131 4A 00 06 35
134 2D 00 00 40
134 2F 00 08 10
134 3 00 03 00
135 5 00 15 60
135 3A 00 03 55
135 7B 00 05 95
136 2A 00 01 25
136 2B 00 06 30
136 7C 00 05 35
136 3B 00 11 20
136 6 00 03 20
144 3 00 04 30
144 7A 00 07 15
144 4B 00 03 50
144 4A 00 06 80
155 3B 00 06 35
155 3C 00 02 55
155 4A 00 01 50
155 4B 00 00 40
158 1A4 00 04 30
158 2 00 01 30
158 3 00 06 35
158 6A 00 03 70
158 7A1 00 05 80
158 1A6 00 02 00
158 6B 00 03 00
158 4B 00 02 10
158 1A5 00 01 00
160 1B 00 03 75
160 33 00 06 15
160 1D 00 06 55
160 1A 00 00 95
160 1C 00 05 10
161 2A2 00 08 00
164 1 00 03 60
164 2A1 00 24 40
164 4 00 00 65
165 3H 00 07 00
179 3 00 04 00
179 2 00 05 85
179 4B1 00 03 90
180 4A1 00 04 60
180 4A2 00 06 10
181 7B 00 05 65
186 2 00 13 70
186 3 00 01 65
186 4 00 10 90
190 1 00 09 35
190 2 00 11 10
191 6A2 00 04 30
191 7A 00 00 40
191 5B 00 01 50
191 6A1 00 05 90
200 4 00 00 40
200 6 00 00 40
200 5 00 03 50
200 7A 00 00 95
200 8 00 12 10
Kadaladi 19 Appanur 319 1A 00 16 20
319 1B 00 10 35
319 2 00 05 20
339 1 00 08 60
340 1 00 01 65
340 2 00 24 45
340 4 00 09 00
344 3 00 22 00
344 2 00 06 40
351 3C 00 09 90
351 1A 00 11 00
350 2B 00 20 00
350 2A 00 00 40
350 3 00 27 75
358 1A 00 08 70
348 5B 00 04 00
348 5A 00 04 00
348 4B 00 06 75
348 4A 00 07 00
348 3B 00 00 65
359 3B 00 05 25
359 3A 00 05 30
Kadaladi 17 Maravar Karisalkulam 297 2 00 33 50
295 2B 00 13 00
295 2A 00 07 10
294 2 00 07 60
301 1 00 01 30
293 2 00 28 75
303 2 00 06 80
303 3B 00 13 00
303 4 00 16 65
311 1B 00 00 40
311 1A 00 07 40
304 2 00 15 15
304 1B2 00 06 00
304 1B1 00 07 00
304 1A4 00 00 40
308 1 00 11 55
308 2 00 11 15
284 3 00 05 10
283 1A1 00 04 70
283 1A2 00 04 35
283 1A3 00 05 05
283 1A4 00 04 00
283 1A5 00 01 50
283 1A6 00 00 40
282 2B 00 04 85
282 1B 00 09 55
282 1A 00 03 00
277 1A 00 00 90
281 2C 00 00 65
280 3 00 11 00
280 2 00 09 75
280 1A2 00 00 40
280 1A3 00 08 10
280 1B 00 03 60
176 2 00 10 80
175 14B 00 01 65
175 14A 00 00 40
175 14C 00 06 60
175 13 00 07 40
180 5B 00 09 60
177 3B 00 04 85
177 3A 00 07 75
177 1A 00 00 50
177 1B 00 10 70
178 10A 00 08 30
178 9B 00 00 40
178 8 00 08 25
178 2 00 00 95
178 3 00 07 70
178 1 00 07 20
199 2 00 10 65
200 3 00 18 90
200 2 00 13 90
200 1B 00 06 00
200 1A2 00 06 85
201 3 00 09 30
201 2 00 09 35
201 1 00 13 15
138 1 00 06 85
139 2C 00 00 40
139 3A 00 11 65
139 3B 00 25 55
132 3A 00 01 75
132 1A 00 02 80
131 16 00 02 40
131 14B 00 03 40
131 14A 00 03 80
131 13 00 07 20
131 12A 00 03 40
131 12B 00 05 50
131 1B 00 01 50
131 1A 00 00 40
131 2B 00 09 35
131 2A 00 01 00
131 3 00 00 75
140 2C 00 04 70
126 2C 00 03 10
126 2D 00 01 05
126 2B1 00 02 35
126 2A 00 02 20
126 3B 00 04 05
126 3A 00 02 70
126 4A 00 12 00
126 4B1 00 00 60
126 1 00 00 40
125 1H 00 33 50
124 4B2 00 00 50
124 5C 00 02 75
124 5B 00 02 75
124 5A 00 03 00
124 2B 00 04 95
124 6A 00 03 75
124 1 00 03 15
109 17A 00 00 75
109 19 00 01 20
109 17B1 00 05 80
109 9B 00 02 25
109 9C 00 02 25
109 5C 00 03 15
109 10 00 01 25
109 11 00 01 95
109 5B 00 06 15
109 1B 00 03 70
109 3 00 01 00
109 2 00 03 80
108 2C2 00 03 00
108 2B 00 02 15
108 2A5 00 00 75
106 17A2 00 00 40
106 17A1 00 00 40
106 17B 00 09 70
106 2 00 04 65
106 1C 00 01 70
106 1D 00 04 40
106 1B 00 04 40
106 5 00 00 65
103 4B 00 06 50
103 7 00 03 40
103 5B 00 04 00
103 5C 00 05 85
100 2 00 07 00
100 3B 00 00 40
100 3A 00 02 85
100 1B 00 02 60
100 5A1 00 06 15
100 5A2 00 02 85
99 3 00 11 75
99 5 00 00 50
99 4D 00 00 75
99 4E 00 06 30
99 4A 00 01 60
87 4 00 06 30
87 2C 00 12 25
87 2A 00 07 20
87 1 00 12 80
87 3A 00 03 80
Kadaladi 15 S Vagaikkulam 6 1A 00 31 80
6 2A/2 00 00 65
6 2A1 00 04 90
6 2C 00 03 00
6 2D 00 00 40
7 3B 00 00 40
7 3C 00 02 30
7 3D 00 07 15
7 3E 00 02 85
7 3G 00 04 95
7 2E 00 04 25
7 2A 00 04 50
7 1F 00 04 45
7 1B 00 00 40
7 1C 00 03 55
7 1D 00 00 95
5 2B 00 05 10
5 2A 00 03 85
5 3D 00 00 40
4 3 00 17 40
3 7 00 24 55
3 2 00 20 50
3 1A1B 00 05 50
19 00 20 40
Kadaladi 3 Avathandai 81 2 00 31 50
88 00 00 45
90 3 00 01 20
90 5 00 07 00
91 2 00 18 50
91 1 00 18 75
92 2 00 03 45
92 1 00 16 60
95 2 00 02 00
95 1 00 07 25
96 3 00 11 55
96 1 00 25 65
97 16 00 00 40
183 10A 00 10 00
183 10B 00 05 10
183 3 00 04 25
183 7 00 00 40
186 8 00 05 10
186 6 00 01 40
186 1B 00 06 50
186 7 00 00 60
186 10 00 04 50
187 5 00 00 40
187 6 00 04 50
187 3 00 04 75
187 7 00 02 10
190 1 00 06 50
191 12 00 02 00
191 9 00 03 00
191 10 00 08 70
191 8 00 00 40
191 13/B 00 17 45
207 4 00 02 65
207 1 00 03 45
208 4 00 01 35
208 7 00 04 70
208 5 00 03 60
208 6 00 03 60
209 7 00 08 25
209 6 00 00 70
209 8 00 13 70
211 3 00 05 60
211 4 00 00 60
211 2 00 04 50
213 7 00 08 25
213 5 00 05 35
213 9 00 00 70
213 4 00 05 50
213 8 00 02 60
213 6 00 08 80
213 3C 00 02 00
213 3D 00 06 80
279 1 00 11 60
280 4 00 07 25
280 1 00 07 45
280 3 00 06 40
280 2 00 13 40
281 6 00 00 40
281 5B2 00 00 55
282 1A 00 19 40
282 1C1 00 09 50
282 1B 00 09 75
283 1 00 38 00
285 7 00 06 40
305 2 00 13 30
306 8 00 10 00
306 7 00 00 40
306 3 00 07 55
306 9 00 01 60
306 5 00 06 00
306 4 00 01 75
306 6 00 10 80
306 2 00 00 90
307 1 00 16 00
307 2 00 09 65
312 4B 00 00 40
312 4A 00 02 65
312 3 00 08 10
316 6B 00 12 40
316 5 00 02 60
338 1 00 27 50
338 2A 00 00 60
339 3 00 05 00
339 2 00 16 00
339 6 00 06 30
339 5 00 07 40
339 1B 00 00 40
339 7A 00 07 75
344 1 00 12 80
344 2 00 09 50
344 3 00 00 40
345 2 00 00 40
345 9 00 06 00
346 3 00 14 70
346 2 00 15 50
347 2 00 09 25
347 4A 00 00 60
347 3B 00 03 70
347 3A 00 14 40
347 1 00 06 50
348 1 00 22 50
349 00 00 40
Kadaladi 4 A Nedunkulam 45 8 00 00 40
45 9 00 04 00
45 10 00 03 50
45 11 00 07 20
45 14 00 07 30
45 6A 00 03 15
45 6B 00 06 00
45 7A 00 03 65
45 7B 00 00 70
46 9 00 01 65
46 8A 00 03 50
46 8B 00 01 70
50 7 00 07 90
50 8 00 07 65
50 6A 00 02 30
50 6B 00 04 65
50 9A 00 05 50
50 9B 00 04 90
57 1 00 10 60
57 4 00 08 00
57 5 00 00 40
59 5 00 11 30
59 6A 00 09 00
59 6B 00 08 10
61 1 00 21 25
61 2 00 07 70
61 3 00 01 60
63 2 00 11 75
63 1A 00 00 60
63 1B 00 13 00
63 3B 00 00 40
108 3 00 04 75
108 1A 00 07 90
108 2A 00 02 75
109 2 00 08 80
109 1A 00 07 30
109 1B 00 00 40
109 4A 00 09 50
110 1B 00 08 20
110 2B 00 09 75
110 3B 00 01 25
113 2A 00 03 75
113 2B 00 00 40
113 3D 00 00 70
113 3E 00 06 40
113 3F 00 01 10
114 3 00 03 10
114 4 00 04 10
114 6 00 03 00
114 11 00 01 20
114 1B 00 04 85
114 1C 00 06 80
114 7A1 00 01 90
114 7A2 00 06 80
115 1A 00 01 00
115 1B 00 01 00
116 5 00 04 00
116 6A 00 01 00
116 6B 00 04 40
116 8 00 08 40
116 9 00 11 10
116 11 00 01 15
116 4A 00 03 70
116 4B 00 04 70
120 15 00 08 90
130 11 00 23 50
132 7 00 04 90
132 2B 00 04 60
132 8B2 00 03 70
134 6B 00 00 60
134 6D 00 01 85
134 6E 00 04 20
134 6H 00 09 95
135 4 00 03 85
135 5 00 02 20
135 6 00 04 65
135 7 00 04 05
135 8 00 04 60
172 16 00 00 40
172 17 00 03 20
172 21 00 06 50
172 22 00 04 95
172 1C 00 04 40
172 1D 00 01 00
173 6 00 09 75
173 3E 00 00 40
173 4B 00 03 50
173 5B1 00 00 45
173 5B2 00 03 75
173 5C 00 00 55
174 15 00 24 45
174 14C 00 00 40
175 10 00 01 25
211 2 00 03 65
211 3B 00 04 55
211 3C 00 06 60
211 3D 00 06 70
211 4A 00 00 80
211 5A 00 03 10
211 6A 00 05 40
212 3 00 07 55
212 1C 00 04 05
212 6B1 00 02 20
212 6B2 00 07 90
213 10 00 03 20
213 6A 00 00 55
213 6B 00 03 25
213 7A 00 07 00
213 7B 00 01 30
213 8A 00 03 60
213 9A 00 04 20
226 2 00 00 40
226 4 00 10 90
226 8 00 04 60
226 7A 00 07 60
226 7B 00 00 40
226 9B1 00 02 70
226 9B2 00 02 60
230 2 00 18 65
230 1A4 00 10 00
230 1B1 00 30 20
230 1B2 00 08 00
231 2 00 11 30
231 3 00 05 40
231 1B 00 00 40
231 1C 00 04 90
231 1D 00 05 80
231 1E 00 03 40
234 00 01 25
Kadaladi 66 Kokkarasan Kottai 464 3 00 04 35
453 1 00 00 80
457 1B 00 03 45
457 1A1 00 05 90
457 1A2 00 06 25
457 2 00 29 40
452 2 00 14 75
450 2 00 00 40
450 1 00 20 90
449 5 00 05 60
449 7B 00 00 40
449 4 00 05 55
449 7A 00 04 70
449 3 00 13 70
449 2B 00 00 40
447 7C 00 00 40
448 2 00 07 95
448 1 00 05 80
448 4A 00 03 75
448 4B 00 04 75
448 4C 00 04 55
448 4D 00 05 50
433 8A 00 08 85
433 8B 00 00 85
433 7 00 09 15
433 2 00 09 10
433 1 00 00 45
430 1 00 03 70
430 3 00 25 60
Kadaladi 7 Kondunallanpatti 105 7A 00 00 40
105 6 00 04 90
106 5B1 00 00 40
106 5B2 00 07 40
106 4 00 08 65
106 3 00 06 50
118 2A 00 18 90
118 2B 00 03 50
118 4A 00 08 70
118 5A 00 02 90
118 1 00 03 55
118 3 00 01 10
124 3B 00 13 50
127 4 00 01 10
127 1 00 00 45
127 2 00 25 90
127 3 00 08 30
132 2 00 07 20
132 1Q 00 06 00
134 1A 00 23 65
137 5 00 29 60
140 2C 00 16 20
140 2D 00 05 30
140 2B 00 02 30
140 3 00 07 70
212 5 00 06 65
212 4A 00 00 65
212 6 00 05 90
212 4B 00 05 00
212 3 00 06 00
212 1B 00 09 70
212 1A 00 02 90
212 2 00 02 10
214 3 00 12 60
214 1B 00 09 45
214 4B 00 00 40
214 2 00 10 80
214 4A 00 09 10
219 6B 00 01 10
220 1 00 25 10
220 2 00 11 70
220 4 00 02 30
220 3 00 12 80
221 1 00 01 65
221 3B 00 06 70
221 3A 00 07 10
229 1 00 11 60
230 2B 00 13 70
230 2A 00 12 00
231 3B 00 06 25
231 2 00 01 30
231 3A 00 11 60
232 1D 00 00 40
232 3B 00 20 70
232 1B 00 14 50
232 1C 00 08 80
233 2 00 11 00
324 4 00 00 70
326 3A2 00 09 00
326 3A1 00 06 50
326 3A4 00 09 25
326 3A3 00 08 85
326 3B 00 22 05
332 2 00 11 00
333 3D2 00 11 50
333 5B 00 04 20
349 1A1 00 15 70
350 1A 00 16 85
350 1B 00 00 40
350 1C 00 09 80
350 2A 00 02 10
351 2B3 00 10 10
353 1 00 41 00
Mudukulathur 8 Mela Sirupothu 266 2A 00 05 25
266 2B 00 04 90
266 3A 00 04 85
266 3B 00 05 15
267 2A 00 11 75
269 1A 00 07 55
269 1B 00 07 55
269 2A 00 04 15
269 2B 00 04 35
269 3A 00 08 30
270 1B 00 03 90
270 2A 00 03 85
270 3C 00 00 50
271 1A 00 08 95
289 1A 00 04 45
289 1B 00 04 45
289 1C 00 04 45
289 1D 00 05 10
289 3A 00 02 50
289 3B 00 06 85
291 1A 00 03 45
290 7 00 19 35
290 13A 00 04 40
290 13B 00 04 40
290 13C 00 07 60
290 12B 00 00 40
290 12C 00 01 10
Kamuthi 47 M. Pudukulam 1 12 00 02 80
1 13 00 07 90
3843 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3844 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3845 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3846 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3847 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3848 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3849 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3850 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3851 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3852 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3853 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3854 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3855 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3856 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3857 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3858 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3859 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3860 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3861 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3862 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3863 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3864 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3865 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3866 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3867

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 809809809809....————के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए भारत सरकार के पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2383 तारीख 29.09.2017 में, जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II, ख;ड 3, उपख;ड (ii), भारत का राजपत्र सं. 41 में पृष्ठ 7903 और 7906 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात:-

पृष्ठ 7903 (हिदी अिधसूचना ) और 7906 (अंCेजी अिधसूचना) में, "44. सडयंकु प्पम" गांव के संबंध में "तालुक-पोन्नेरी, िजला-तिIवल्लुर, राज्य-तमिलनाडु" की जगह "तालुक- तिIवोMियूर, िजला-तिIवल्लुर, राज्य-तिमलनाडु" के रूप मे पढ़ा जाए।

अिधसूचना का शेष िवषय अपरिवOतत रहेंगे ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 809.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub section (1) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2383 dated the 29.09.2017, published in Part- II, Section 3, Sub section (ii) of the Gazette of India, No.41, at page No.7903 and 7906 namely:-

In Page 7903 (Hindi Notification) and in Page 7906 (English Notification) for the Village "44.Sadayankuppam" of "Taluk- Ponneri, District- Tiruvallur, State-Tamil Nadu" may be read as "44.Sadayankuppam" of "Taluk- Thiruvottiyur, District- Tiruvallur, State-Tamil Nadu"

The other contents of the notification remain unaltered.

[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 810810810810....————के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पQात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) भारत के राजपत्र, (असाधारण) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना का.आ. 334(अ), तारीख 27 जनवरी 2017, द्ववारा तमिलनाडु राज्य में एन्नोर - तिIवल्लूर - बेंगलुI - पांिडचेरी - नागपMिनम - मदुरै - टूटिकोरिन पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कापUरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और उक्त आधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 09.02.2017 को उपलब्द करा दी गई थी।

और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।

और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पQात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलZ अनुसूची में विनि[दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए।

अत: अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा(1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना के संलZ अनुसूची में विनि[दष्ट उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अOजत किया जाता है।

यह और कि के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा(4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए यह निद'श देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाश की तारीख से के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त हो कर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।

3868 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूOत के लिए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उत्तरदायी होगी और पाइपलाइन से सम्बन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार के विId कोई वाद दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहe हो सके गी।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला : रामनाथपुरम राज्य : तिमलनाडू NaN
तालुका का नाम गाँव का नाम सव`क्षण सं. उप ख;ड सं. क्षेत्रफल NaN
हेक्टेर एयर वर्ग मीटर NaN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NaN
रामनाथपुरम 53 वालान्तरवै 202 4 00 01 80 NaN
202 5बी 00 08 65 NaN
96 4ए 00 14 75 NaN
96 5ए 00 08 90 NaN
96 3 00 17 00 NaN
96 2 00 00 40 NaN
96 1 00 01 30 NaN
95 6डी 00 00 40 NaN
95 6ई 00 00 40 NaN
95 7 00 10 70 NaN
95 3 00 01 45 NaN
95 2 00 05 50 NaN
95 1 00 07 00 NaN
98 2 00 11 90 NaN
99 9 00 14 95 NaN
99 8 00 03 10 NaN
99 5 00 04 70 NaN
99 4 00 02 35 NaN
99 3 00 02 30 NaN
99 1 00 08 30 NaN
88 5सी 00 03 95 NaN
88 4सी 00 03 90 NaN
100 1 00 26 40 NaN
100 2ए 00 01 40 NaN
101 5ए 00 13 30 NaN
101 4बी2 00 00 40 NaN
101 5बी 00 15 60 NaN
101 5सी 00 01 35 NaN
101 3 00 05 25 NaN
101 6ए 00 13 50 NaN
102 2 00 08 80 NaN
102 3 00 17 60 NaN
102 4ए 00 07 00 NaN
109 5बी 00 12 10 NaN
109 5ए2 00 08 45 NaN
109 5ए1 00 06 10 NaN
110 9बी 00 04 70 NaN
110 9ए 00 04 80 NaN
114 2बी1 00 11 50 NaN
114 2ए1 00 05 20 NaN
114 2ए2 00 00 40 NaN
114 1बी2 00 10 30 NaN
115 3ए 00 06 25 NaN
115 2 00 10 45 NaN
113 4 00 16 80 NaN
113 5ए 00 02 85 NaN
112 3 00 11 50 NaN
112 2इी 00 02 15 NaN
112 2सी 00 02 70 NaN
112 2बी 00 02 35 NaN
112 2ए 00 02 30 NaN
112 1बी 00 08 10 NaN
रामनाथपुरम 52 कु यवनकु डी 181 6सी 00 09 90 NaN
181 6बी2 00 08 95 NaN
182 1बी 00 08 95 NaN
182 2 00 08 85 NaN
182 3 00 07 00 NaN
183 3 00 21 60 NaN
183 2 00 10 90 NaN
183 4बी 00 10 50 NaN
184 1बी2 00 19 00 NaN
184 1बी1 00 04 10 NaN
185 3सी 00 15 80
185 3बी 00 18 25
189 1 00 06 35
189 2बी 00 04 90
189 2ए 00 03 50
190 1ए1 00 07 95
190 1ए2 00 01 95
168 4सी 00 05 70
167 1ए 00 12 15
167 3बी1 00 01 15
167 3बी2ए 00 09 40
167 3बी2बी 00 02 00
167 3ए 00 06 75
166 1सी 00 00 40
166 1बी 00 09 70
166 2ए2 00 05 15
166 2ए1 00 00 80
166 3ए 00 09 30
166 4 00 22 30
रामनाथपुरम 46 सiरiोMै 355 2 00 04 50
355 3 00 07 50
355 1ए1 00 06 60
354 2 00 02 70
354 1 00 03 55
351 9 00 00 85
351 12 00 05 45
351 11सी 00 05 45
351 11ए 00 05 25
351 5 00 07 90
351 2ए 00 06 50
351 3ए 00 06 60
351 3बी 00 05 30
361 1ए 00 01 90
361 1बी 00 10 65
361 2 00 00 40
361 1सी 00 00 40
347 1 00 01 25
347 2ए 00 23 20
347 2बी 00 12 00
362 2 00 02 35
362 3बी 00 06 75
362 4 00 07 20
363 1ए 00 03 25
363 1बी 00 03 30
363 2 00 07 70
363 3 00 06 45
537 3बी 00 12 95
536 4 00 04 50
536 8ए 00 16 40
536 8बी1 00 00 40
536 6 00 07 40
536 7 00 00 65
535 3 00 14 50
534 1 00 12 30
534 3 00 06 50
526 3ए 00 05 00
526 3बी 00 04 20
526 2ए 00 05 85
526 1बी 00 00 40
527 1 00 01 50
527 2 00 02 30
527 4बी 00 03 15
527 5 00 04 15
527 3ए1 00 00 65
527 3ए2 00 02 50
527 3बी 00 03 20
527 3सी 00 03 55
527 3इी 00 03 50
528 3 00 08 20
528 4ए 00 04 40
528 4बी 00 04 30
528 5 00 08 35
528 6 00 08 55
528 7 00 08 00
528 8सी 00 04 25
528 9-1 00 03 70
528 9-2 00 03 35
529 1 00 06 45
529 2 00 05 90
529 3 00 05 70
529 4 00 05 55
529 5 00 06 55
502 1ए 00 15 30
502 3ए 00 20 35
504 1बी1ए1 00 28 65
504 2ए1ए 00 05 30
504 2ए1बी 00 05 00
504 2बी 00 05 15
504 3ए 00 05 30
504 3बी 00 04 10
504 4 00 06 90
506 1 00 05 70
506 2 00 03 80
506 3 00 03 95
506 4ए4 00 03 85
506 4सी 00 03 75
506 4बी 00 03 20
506 4इी 00 03 70
506 4ई 00 01 60
500 1 00 02 00
499 1ए 00 08 80
499 2 00 11 35
499 3ए 00 11 10
कीलकरै 47 कु दiोMै 19 6 00 01 70
19 5 00 09 60
19 4 00 00 80
20 1सी 00 04 55
20 1इी 00 02 80
20 1जे 00 00 60
20 1आई 00 02 80
20 1एच 00 00 85
20 1के 00 03 70
20 1ओ 00 03 30
20 1एन 00 00 95
20 1आर 00 01 15
20 1एस 00 02 45
20 1यु 00 02 70
20 1इजत 00 01 65
20 1वी 00 00 90
20 1वाई 00 00 60
20 1एक्स 00 01 70
20 1डबलयू 00 00 80
20 2ए 00 01 30
21 1ए 00 02 10
21 1बी 00 11 40
21 1ई 00 00 60
21 1इी 00 01 65
21 1सी 00 05 80
25 1 00 00 85
26 1ए1 00 06 80
26 1बी 00 02 70
26 1सी 00 03 20
26 2ए 00 03 60
26 2बी 00 02 70
27 2ए4 00 04 35
27 2बी 00 05 45
27 2सी 00 06 45
27 4ए 00 13 60
28 6बी 00 15 10
28 6ए 00 19 40
30 8सी 00 00 90
38 3ए 00 12 10
38 4ए 00 08 00
38 4सी1 00 10 10
39 2 00 15 30
39 3जी 00 04 10
39 3आई 00 04 45
39 3जे 00 08 40
39 3एल 00 01 65
39 5 00 03 00
42 5 00 00 60
43 7ए 00 02 00
43 1ए 00 07 10
43 2 00 06 00
43 3ए 00 01 25
151 1इी 00 06 80
151 2ए3 00 03 65
151 1सी 00 01 90
151 2ए2 00 00 60
151 2सी 00 00 60
151 2इी2 00 02 70
151 2ई2 00 02 25
151 3ए2 00 04 50
151 5 00 02 55
151 3बी1 00 01 45
151 4ए2 00 00 60
151 4ए1 00 00 60
152 2बी2 00 00 80
152 2बी1 00 01 10
153 1जी 00 00 65
153 1इी 00 02 80
153 1ई 00 03 00
153 1एफ 00 03 25
153 2ए 00 08 45
153 3बी 00 09 00
153 4 00 10 10
153 5इी 00 03 40
153 5सी 00 03 00
153 5के 1 00 04 80
153 5के 2 00 01 10
155 11 00 01 90
155 14ए 00 00 40
155 15ए 00 00 60
155 13ए 00 02 30
155 4बी2 00 00 80
155 4इी 00 04 30
156 1ए 00 05 50
156 1बी 00 07 90
कीलकरै 46 तिIप्पुल्लानी 67 2 00 00 75
67 1ए 00 07 20
67 1बी 00 01 90
66 5ए 00 04 75
66 5बी 00 01 90
65 8इी 00 00 70
65 9जी2 00 05 00
65 9एच 00 00 40
65 9एफ 00 00 70
65 9ई 00 05 45
65 10 00 00 60
65 9इी 00 00 90
65 9सी 00 07 20
65 9बी 00 03 30
69 3ए3 00 10 20
69 1बी 00 02 45
69 1सी 00 06 70
69 2 00 18 40
62 4बी 00 00 60
70 1 00 08 50
70 2 00 01 10
59 4 00 11 00
59 5ए 00 03 55
59 5बी 00 04 40
59 6 00 10 75
59 7ए 00 04 30
59 7बी 00 02 80
59 3 00 01 95
58 5 00 00 60
58 2बी 00 05 20
58 2सी 00 00 60
58 2ए 00 03 60
58 3ए 00 01 50
58 1 00 11 90
48 00 02 00
50 12 00 17 85
52 6 00 02 80
52 5 00 14 00
52 7 00 00 60
52 3 00 00 60
53 1बी 00 02 55
53 2 00 01 45
53 3 00 05 00
53 4 00 14 00
53 5ए 00 03 00
53 5बी 00 03 20
53 6 00 02 95
42 1ए 00 08 30
42 1बी 00 07 85
42 2बी 00 01 50
42 2सी 00 01 45
42 3ए 00 02 60
42 4 00 03 20
42 5 00 02 80
42 6 00 02 70
42 7 00 01 90
42 8ए 00 00 60
43 4जे1 00 06 30
43 4जे2 00 00 60
43 4आई2 00 06 20
43 4एच2 00 02 90
41 00 09 80
78 00 18 40
79 00 01 60
124 1ए2 00 11 60
124 1ए1 00 07 10
128 2 00 23 75
137 9 00 03 05
137 13 00 10 35
137 14 00 07 95
136 2ए2 00 03 55
136 2बी 00 08 90
137 15 00 08 65
137 16 00 09 55
136 1जी 00 00 85
135 3 00 07 60
135 2 00 10 00
135 1 00 07 40
149 2एफ 00 00 60
149 2जी 00 03 10
149 2एच 00 05 10
149 2आई 00 03 75
149 3ए 00 02 60
149 1एफ 00 09 00
149 1सी 00 02 80
149 1इी 00 07 20
157 5 00 18 55
158 11 00 00 60
158 9सी 00 07 00
158 8 00 08 40
158 7 00 09 20
158 6बी 00 09 40
158 5 00 02 90
158 4 00 03 40
158 3 00 02 10
158 2इी 00 00 40
162 2सी2 00 00 60
162 2बी2 00 05 30
162 2ए2 00 04 65
162 2ए1 00 05 30
162 1एफ 00 02 90
162 1ई 00 00 95
162 1इी 00 00 60
171 1 00 16 95
174 00 17 60
175 01 24 00
कीलकरै 42 कलरी 392 9 00 15 75
392 10 00 01 10
392 8 00 09 80
392 1बी3 00 07 20
375 5बी 00 13 45
375 5ए 00 06 80
375 2 00 06 70
374 5 00 06 80
374 3 00 12 60
374 2बी 00 09 35
374 1सी 00 04 20
376 1ए 00 00 60
377 7ई 00 01 10
377 7इी 00 01 60
377 7सी 00 01 40
377 7बी 00 01 85
377 6बी 00 07 70
377 6ए 00 09 45
373 5बी 00 01 00
373 5ए 00 00 60
377 1 00 06 50
350 1 00 04 60
350 2 00 13 60
350 3 00 01 05
349 4ए 00 04 50
349 7 00 04 00
349 6 00 04 30
349 5 00 08 50
349 9 00 10 50
345 1 00 01 05
346 7 00 09 00
346 6बी 00 04 10
346 6ए 00 05 00
346 5 00 09 30
346 4 00 19 20
341 4 00 10 65
341 2 00 07 10
341 3बी 00 05 90
341 3ए 00 13 20
340 9 00 03 90
331 1 00 08 50
292 4 00 08 20
292 3 00 08 20
292 2 00 08 90
287 1 00 03 50
288 2 00 13 20
288 1 00 13 90
290 2ए 00 06 10
290 1 00 20 00
277 2बी 00 15 80
278 4 00 11 65
278 1 00 19 20
266 2बी 00 05 10
266 2सी 00 12 30
266 3 00 13 00
266 4 00 12 25
264 1 00 03 20
262 5 00 22 10
262 6ए 00 02 20
261 11सी 00 00 45
कीलकरै 41 कु लपदम 99 1 00 00 80
100 1 00 16 00
98 2सी2 00 00 80
98 7 00 08 85
98 9 00 05 55
98 8 00 06 50
97 2बी 00 04 20
97 2ए 00 06 40
97 1 00 05 70
2 7 00 01 30
2 6 00 04 50
2 8ए 00 02 40
2 8बी 00 04 00
3 3ए 00 07 20
3 3बी 00 08 30
3 8 00 19 20
4 5 00 00 80
4 4 00 16 80
16 3 00 05 50
17 3ए 00 12 20
17 3बी 00 01 00
17 2 00 14 40
17 1 00 02 70
18 1 00 07 60
19 7 00 06 00
19 10 00 09 60
21 3ए 00 07 25
21 2 00 00 80
21 3बी 00 04 20
21 4बी 00 06 75
21 7 00 06 95
24 3 00 00 80
24 1बी 00 10 10
24 2 00 01 50
30 2 00 05 75
30 5बी 00 02 00
30 4 00 00 80
30 5सी 00 02 20
30 5ई 00 03 20
30 7 00 01 00
30 6 00 07 80
29 1 00 11 10
33 4ए 00 05 10
33 4बी 00 12 80
33 5 00 10 80
33 2 00 03 20
34 2ए2 00 14 10
34 2बी 00 07 30
37 5 00 15 15
37 4 00 00 95
36 3सी 00 00 80
36 2बी 00 07 80
36 2ए 00 09 20
36 1ए 00 13 00
36 1बी 00 15 75
40 4ए 00 09 55
40 3ए 00 05 40
39 00 06 30
40 2 00 06 10
40 1 00 20 20
45 1ए 00 07 10
कीलकरै 33 वेलनूर 90 1 00 04 55
90 2 00 05 25
90 3 00 03 35
90 4 00 04 85
89 1 00 06 05
89 4 00 08 25
89 5 00 05 45
91 1 00 24 20
87 1ई1 00 10 25
87 2ए 00 12 90
87 2बी 00 11 25
87 2इी 00 07 95
86 2 00 03 30
86 3इी 00 04 30
84 00 16 45
83 3 00 13 15
83 4 00 11 90
85 1 00 02 10
85 2 00 00 40
81 2 00 42 45
110 2 00 28 20
110 1 00 08 00
111 1 00 13 20
111 4 00 00 40
111 3 00 06 40
76 1 00 05 45
76 2 00 29 55
76 3 00 14 35
118 1ए 00 10 35
119 2 00 00 60
119 3 00 10 80
120 1 00 15 60
120 3 00 21 80
120 2 00 06 80
121 1 00 14 10
121 2 00 14 50
122 2 00 17 30
122 3 00 08 65
122 4 00 08 85
124 1 00 07 70
124 2ए 00 01 60
124 3 00 00 40
123 2 00 00 50
123 3ए 00 06 40
123 3बी 00 05 00
123 3सी 00 02 40
123 4ए 00 01 85
123 4बी 00 04 75
123 4सी 00 04 65
126 1 00 24 45
127 2ए 00 05 90
127 3 00 08 15
129 1ए 00 07 00
129 1बी 00 02 50
129 2बी 00 05 00
129 2सी 00 02 00
129 3ए 00 00 70
129 3बी 00 00 40
128 1बी 00 12 30
128 3 00 06 80
128 4सी 00 01 10
134 3 00 02 05
134 2 00 04 40
134 4 00 06 90
134 9 00 04 50
134 8 00 00 40
134 7ए 00 01 30
134 7बी 00 07 75
135 1सी 00 10 25
135 2बी 00 04 65
155 7ए 00 00 45
156 2इी 00 06 40
156 2सी 00 00 90
156 3 00 10 70
156 6 00 11 85
156 7ए 00 04 00
156 7बी 00 03 80
156 7सी 00 03 90
157 1ए 00 03 00
157 1बी 00 03 10
157 2 00 06 25
157 4ए 00 01 50
157 5 00 04 20
157 6 00 02 60
157 7 00 04 10
157 8/बी 00 04 00
157 8/ए 00 00 40
157 8/सी 00 05 30
164 2ए 00 01 20
164 2बी 00 04 90
164 7 00 10 80
164 8ए 00 00 70
164 6 00 21 80
163 4 00 03 00
165 5 00 00 40
165 6/बी 00 00 85
165 7/बी 00 01 60
165 8 00 11 10
166 2ए 00 00 40
166 1ए 00 08 40
166 1बी 00 04 75
166 3ए 00 00 40
220 1ए 00 04 40
221 9बी 00 05 30
221 2 00 05 00
221 5 00 07 10
221 7 00 02 80
222 10बी 00 01 40
222 10ए 00 13 85
222 9 00 12 65
222 8 00 04 45
222 6बी 00 00 40
238 1ए 00 08 30
238 1बी 00 01 50
224 1ए1 00 22 25
226 1ए 00 06 60
226 1बी 00 06 45
226 2ए 00 05 80
226 3ए 00 02 80
229 2ए 00 16 90
कीलकरै 32 पनैयडियेन्दल 34 3 00 07 90
34 4 00 04 50
35 2 00 04 65
35 3ई 00 09 10
43 1 00 11 20
43 2इी 00 00 40
43 2सी 00 04 85
43 2बी 00 08 45
43 2ए 00 05 70
43 2एच 00 02 25
45 00 11 95
46 1बी 00 00 40
46 1सी 00 02 80
46 2ई 00 06 25
46 3 00 07 20
49 1ए 00 03 10
49 1बी 00 03 20
49 1सी 00 03 20
49 1इी 00 04 40
49 1ई 00 04 70
49 1एफ 00 03 80
49 1जी 00 01 50
47 1ए6 00 04 10
49 1एच 00 00 40
47 1बी2 00 05 10
47 1बी3ए 00 04 50
47 1बी3बी 00 04 90
47 12 00 01 15
47 13 00 00 60
47 14 00 00 40
47 2सी 00 00 40
47 11 00 12 00
47 2इी 00 01 80
47 2ई 00 01 40
56 7ए 00 03 10
56 7बी 00 01 95
56 7सी 00 02 20
56 7इी 00 02 00
56 6ए 00 08 10
56 4ए 00 02 40
56 4बी 00 04 20
56 4सी 00 00 40
56 4इी 00 05 05
55 1 00 09 90
57 5 00 00 40
57 6 00 00 70
57 7 00 01 70
57 10सी 00 02 60
57 10बी 00 05 40
58 4 00 09 30
58 3बी 00 07 60
165 6 00 03 30
165 5 00 05 90
165 1सी 00 00 40
165 7 00 00 50
165 4बी 00 12 00
165 4ए 00 00 40
155 8 00 09 10
155 9 00 08 50
155 10बी 00 04 95
155 10सी 00 01 90
154 12 00 06 90
157 1 00 02 50
157 2 00 04 80
154 13 00 02 10
157 3 00 08 00
153 15 00 11 50
153 16बी 00 11 40
141 7ए 00 08 30
141 5 00 03 20
141 8ए 00 00 40
141 6बी 00 10 40
140 1 00 00 40
139 2 00 04 70
139 3सी 00 04 95
139 9 00 00 40
139 8 00 09 70
139 7 00 05 00
138 2बी 00 00 95
138 2ए 00 03 55
138 6ए 00 02 30
138 6बी 00 02 25
138 8ए 00 02 40
138 8बी 00 01 60
138 9 00 04 35
137 1ए 00 28 20
203 2 00 32 80
232 4 00 27 50
231 2बी 00 03 60
231 3ए 00 03 50
231 3बी 00 03 55
230 1 00 08 90
230 2 00 08 95
230 3ए1 00 09 80
230 3ए2 00 12 95
230 3बी 00 11 80
230 3सी 00 15 95
220 1 00 11 65
220 2ए 00 03 55
220 2बी 00 03 10
220 3 00 05 25
220 4 00 05 20
220 7 00 14 20
220 8ए 00 05 10
220 9ए 00 04 90
220 10ए 00 04 85
कडलाड़ी 50 सिiल 259 5ई 00 00 80
260 1 00 15 40
260 2 00 06 15
258 4सी 00 09 35
261 00 32 40
248 2 00 00 40
248 5 00 02 60
248 6 00 05 40
248 10 00 05 40
248 8 00 15 40
248 9 00 01 20
247 4 00 04 50
247 3 00 04 50
247 2 00 04 70
247 1 00 05 00
50 1ए1 00 02 90
50 1ए2 00 09 00
49 2सी 00 06 85
49 2इी3 00 15 40
49 2इी5 00 00 40
49 2इी4 00 06 25
49 2इी2 00 00 40
51 1ए 00 18 00
52 1ए 00 17 20
52 1बी 00 00 40
कडलाड़ी 42 पिनवासल 300 2 00 26 65
300 7 00 04 00
300 3 00 07 20
300 4 00 10 45
299 6बी 00 00 80
294 1 00 12 25
294 2 00 00 50
293 5 00 01 70
293 4 00 13 30
295 6ए 00 04 20
295 6बी 00 14 70
295 5 00 00 40
295 1सी 00 11 50
296 3 00 07 20
296 4 00 00 40
296 6 00 03 00
296 5 00 10 50
289 8 00 00 40
289 7 00 03 00
289 1 00 12 00
289 2ए 00 00 80
282 10 00 08 30
284 3 00 06 00
284 2 00 06 00
284 1 00 00 40
284 4 00 08 30
284 5 00 02 30
283 8बी 00 11 50
283 7 00 01 30
283 6 00 10 80
283 5 00 03 25
331 4 00 01 30
331 2 00 06 70
331 1 00 08 50
272 7 00 03 80
273 1 00 08 20
250 10 00 18 20
247 2ई 00 02 20
247 2एफ 00 04 85
247 2जी 00 04 20
247 2एच 00 07 60
247 2आई 00 00 65
247 2के 00 12 15
247 2एल 00 00 70
कडलाड़ी 41 पेयक्कु लम 49 2 00 17 70
49 1 00 15 50
48 4ए 00 01 30
48 4बी 00 04 00
48 3सी 00 07 60
50 1ए 00 00 40
51 9 00 07 10
51 3सी 00 03 30
51 3बी 00 01 00
51 3ई 00 02 80
51 3इी2 00 01 80
51 3इी1 00 03 80
51 8ए 00 00 70
51 4बी 00 12 55
51 4ए 00 00 45
51 6ए 00 00 40
51 5ए 00 13 80
53 2सी 00 00 70
53 3ए 00 00 40
53 2इी 00 15 10
53 2ई 00 07 60
57 8 00 07 50
57 9ए 00 00 40
57 7ए 00 06 10
57 7बी 00 07 20
57 3इी 00 05 60
57 3सी 00 00 40
57 6बी2 00 00 40
57 6बी1 00 00 80
57 4 00 02 75
57 6ए 00 05 90
57 5ए 00 04 90
57 5बी 00 05 40
70 5ए 00 10 80
70 4बी 00 03 60
70 2 00 11 90
70 3ए 00 01 30
70 3बी 00 00 40
56 00 00 40
72 1बी 00 07 40
72 1ए 00 00 60
72 1सी 00 11 70
76 14 00 00 40
76 15 00 07 20
76 16 00 00 40
76 5एफ 00 02 15
76 5ई 00 00 75
76 5इी 00 00 40
76 3बी 00 02 20
76 3ए 00 06 75
76 2ए2 00 06 80
76 2ए1 00 01 85
76 2बी2 00 00 40
76 2बी1 00 00 55
77 4 00 09 40
77 5 00 02 20
77 7ए 00 03 95
83 7सी 00 01 35
83 8 00 06 30
83 6ई 00 03 50
83 6एफ 00 05 00
83 6जी 00 01 35
84 8ए 00 07 40
84 7ए 00 04 85
84 1बी 00 01 35
84 1ए 00 10 75
88 10बी 00 02 90
88 10ए 00 03 45
88 11ए 00 03 85
88 9 00 04 30
88 5 00 03 80
88 4 00 04 35
88 2सी 00 00 40
88 2बी 00 00 40
88 2ए 00 00 40
88 3ए 00 03 65
90 6बी4 00 02 35
90 6बी3 00 02 10
90 6बी2 00 03 50
90 6बी1 00 03 05
90 6ए 00 00 80
89 7आई 00 02 70
89 7ई 00 12 00
89 6 00 15 00
89 4बी 00 00 50
89 4ए 00 02 35
89 5ए 00 00 90
93 2सी4 00 01 10
93 5बी 00 09 00
93 2बी4 00 01 40
93 2बी3 00 01 40
93 4 00 07 50
93 2बी2 00 02 65
93 3ए 00 04 90
94 4के 00 00 40
94 4एल 00 12 50
94 4एम 00 00 55
94 4जे 00 15 85
94 4ई 00 06 15
94 4बी 00 03 60
94 3बी 00 00 40
94 2 00 02 05
95 1 00 15 90
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3869 3870 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3871 3872 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3873 3874 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3875 3876 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3877 3878 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3879 3880 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3881 3882 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3883 3884 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3885 3886 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3887 3888 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3889 3890 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3891 3892 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3893

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/99/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8030]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 810.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O.No.334(E) dated: 27.01.2017 issued under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (herein after referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the Lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Natural Gas, a pipeline "Ennore- Tiruvallur -Bengaluru -Pondicherry -Nagapattinam –Madurai- Tuticorin" should be laid in the State of Tamil Nadu by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas, copies of the said notifications were made available to the public from 09.02.2017.

And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User in the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the said Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration, in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P & M P Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to pipeline.

3894 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

District : Ramanathapuram State : Tamil Nadu
Name of the Taluk Name of the Village Survey No. Sub Division No. Area
Hectare Are Square Meter
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ramanathapuram 53. Valantharavai 202 4 00 01 80
202 5B 00 08 65
96 4A 00 14 75
96 5A 00 08 90
96 3 00 17 00
96 2 00 00 40
96 1 00 01 30
95 6D 00 00 40
95 6E 00 00 40
95 7 00 10 70
95 3 00 01 45
95 2 00 05 50
95 1 00 07 00
98 2 00 11 90
99 9 00 14 95
99 8 00 03 10
99 5 00 04 70
99 4 00 02 35
99 3 00 02 30
99 1 00 08 30
88 5C 00 03 95
88 4C 00 03 90
100 1 00 26 40
100 2A 00 01 40
101 5A 00 13 30
101 4B2 00 00 40
101 5B 00 15 60
101 5C 00 01 35
101 3 00 05 25
101 6A 00 13 50
102 2 00 08 80
102 3 00 17 60
102 4A 00 07 00
109 5B 00 12 10
109 5A2 00 08 45
109 5A1 00 06 10
110 9B 00 04 70
110 9A 00 04 80
114 2B1 00 11 50
114 2A1 00 05 20
114 2A2 00 00 40
114 1B2 00 10 30
115 3A 00 06 25
115 2 00 10 45
113 4 00 16 80
113 5A 00 02 85
112 3 00 11 50
112 2D 00 02 15
112 2C 00 02 70
112 2B 00 02 35
112 2A 00 02 30
112 1B 00 08 10
Ramanathapuram 52. Kuyavankudi 181 6C 00 09 90
181 6B2 00 08 95
182 1B 00 08 95
182 2 00 08 85
182 3 00 07 00
183 3 00 21 60
183 2 00 10 90
183 4B 00 10 50
184 1B2 00 19 00
184 1B1 00 04 10
185 3C 00 15 80
185 3B 00 18 25
189 1 00 06 35
189 2B 00 04 90
189 2A 00 03 50
190 1A1 00 07 95
190 1A2 00 01 95
168 4C 00 05 70
167 1A 00 12 15
167 3B1 00 01 15
167 3B2A 00 09 40
167 3B2B 00 02 00
167 3A 00 06 75
166 1C 00 00 40
166 1B 00 09 70
166 2A2 00 05 15
166 2A1 00 00 80
166 3A 00 09 30
166 4 00 22 30
Ramanathapuram 46. Sakkarakottai 355 2 00 04 50
355 3 00 07 50
355 1A1 00 06 60
354 2 00 02 70
354 1 00 03 55
351 9 00 00 85
351 12 00 05 45
351 11C 00 05 45
351 11A 00 05 25
351 5 00 07 90
351 2A 00 06 50
351 3A 00 06 60
351 3B 00 05 30
361 1A 00 01 90
361 1B 00 10 65
361 2 00 00 40
361 1C 00 00 40
347 1 00 01 25
347 2A 00 23 20
347 2B 00 12 00
362 2 00 02 35
362 3B 00 06 75
362 4 00 07 20
363 1A 00 03 25
363 1B 00 03 30
363 2 00 07 70
363 3 00 06 45
537 3B 00 12 95
536 4 00 04 50
536 8A 00 16 40
536 8B1 00 00 40
536 6 00 07 40
536 7 00 00 65
535 3 00 14 50
534 1 00 12 30
534 3 00 06 50
526 3A 00 05 00
526 3B 00 04 20
526 2A 00 05 85
526 1B 00 00 40
527 1 00 01 50
527 2 00 02 30
527 4B 00 03 15
527 5 00 04 15
527 3A1 00 00 65
527 3A2 00 02 50
527 3B 00 03 20
527 3C 00 03 55
527 3D 00 03 50
528 3 00 08 20
528 4A 00 04 40
528 4B 00 04 30
528 5 00 08 35
528 6 00 08 55
528 7 00 08 00
528 8C 00 04 25
528 9-1 00 03 70
528 9-2 00 03 35
529 1 00 06 45
529 2 00 05 90
529 3 00 05 70
529 4 00 05 55
529 5 00 06 55
502 1A 00 15 30
502 3A 00 20 35
504 1B1A1 00 28 65
504 2A1A 00 05 30
504 2A1B 00 05 00
504 2B 00 05 15
504 3A 00 05 30
504 3B 00 04 10
504 4 00 06 90
506 1 00 05 70
506 2 00 03 80
506 3 00 03 95
506 4A4 00 03 85
506 4C 00 03 75
506 4B 00 03 20
506 4D 00 03 70
506 4E 00 01 60
500 1 00 02 00
499 1A 00 08 80
499 2 00 11 35
499 3A 00 11 10
Kilakarai 47. Kudhakkottai 19 6 00 01 70
19 5 00 09 60
19 4 00 00 80
20 1C 00 04 55
20 1D 00 02 80
20 1J 00 00 60
20 1I 00 02 80
20 1H 00 00 85
20 1K 00 03 70
20 1O 00 03 30
20 1N 00 00 95
20 1R 00 01 15
20 1S 00 02 45
20 1U 00 02 70
20 1Z 00 01 65
20 1V 00 00 90
20 1Y 00 00 60
20 1X 00 01 70
20 1W 00 00 80
20 2A 00 01 30
21 1A 00 02 10
21 1B 00 11 40
21 1E 00 00 60
21 1D 00 01 65
21 1C 00 05 80
25 1 00 00 85
26 1A1 00 06 80
26 1B 00 02 70
26 1C 00 03 20
26 2A 00 03 60
26 2B 00 02 70
27 2A4 00 04 35
27 2B 00 05 45
27 2C 00 06 45
27 4A 00 13 60
28 6B 00 15 10
28 6A 00 19 40
30 8C 00 00 90
38 3A 00 12 10
38 4A 00 08 00
38 4C1 00 10 10
39 2 00 15 30
39 3G 00 04 10
39 3I 00 04 45
39 3J 00 08 40
39 3L 00 01 65
39 5 00 03 00
42 5 00 00 60
43 7A 00 02 00
43 1A 00 07 10
43 2 00 06 00
43 3A 00 01 25
151 1D 00 06 80
151 2A3 00 03 65
151 1C 00 01 90
151 2A2 00 00 60
151 2C 00 00 60
151 2D2 00 02 70
151 2E2 00 02 25
151 3A2 00 04 50
151 5 00 02 55
151 3B1 00 01 45
151 4A2 00 00 60
151 4A1 00 00 60
152 2B2 00 00 80
152 2B1 00 01 10
153 1G 00 00 65
153 1D 00 02 80
153 1E 00 03 00
153 1F 00 03 25
153 2A 00 08 45
153 3B 00 09 00
153 4 00 10 10
153 5D 00 03 40
153 5C 00 03 00
153 5K1 00 04 80
153 5K2 00 01 10
155 11 00 01 90
155 14A 00 00 40
155 15A 00 00 60
155 13A 00 02 30
155 4B2 00 00 80
155 4D 00 04 30
156 1A 00 05 50
156 1B 00 07 90
Kilakarai 46. Tiruppullani 67 2 00 00 75
67 1A 00 07 20
67 1B 00 01 90
66 5A 00 04 75
66 5B 00 01 90
65 8D 00 00 70
65 9G2 00 05 00
65 9H 00 00 40
65 9F 00 00 70
65 9E 00 05 45
65 10 00 00 60
65 9D 00 00 90
65 9C 00 07 20
65 9B 00 03 30
69 3A3 00 10 20
69 1B 00 02 45
69 1C 00 06 70
69 2 00 18 40
62 4B 00 00 60
70 1 00 08 50
70 2 00 01 10
59 4 00 11 00
59 5A 00 03 55
59 5B 00 04 40
59 6 00 10 75
59 7A 00 04 30
59 7B 00 02 80
59 3 00 01 95
58 5 00 00 60
58 2B 00 05 20
58 2C 00 00 60
58 2A 00 03 60
58 3A 00 01 50
58 1 00 11 90
48 00 02 00
50 12 00 17 85
52 6 00 02 80
52 5 00 14 00
52 7 00 00 60
52 3 00 00 60
53 1B 00 02 55
53 2 00 01 45
53 3 00 05 00
53 4 00 14 00
53 5A 00 03 00
53 5B 00 03 20
53 6 00 02 95
42 1A 00 08 30
42 1B 00 07 85
42 2B 00 01 50
42 2C 00 01 45
42 3A 00 02 60
42 4 00 03 20
42 5 00 02 80
42 6 00 02 70
42 7 00 01 90
42 8A 00 00 60
43 4J1 00 06 30
43 4J2 00 00 60
43 4I2 00 06 20
43 4H2 00 02 90
41 00 09 80
78 00 18 40
79 00 01 60
124 1A2 00 11 60
124 1A1 00 07 10
128 2 00 23 75
137 9 00 03 05
137 13 00 10 35
137 14 00 07 95
136 2A2 00 03 55
136 2B 00 08 90
137 15 00 08 65
137 16 00 09 55
136 1G 00 00 85
135 3 00 07 60
135 2 00 10 00
135 1 00 07 40
149 2F 00 00 60
149 2G 00 03 10
149 2H 00 05 10
149 2I 00 03 75
149 3A 00 02 60
149 1F 00 09 00
149 1C 00 02 80
149 1D 00 07 20
157 5 00 18 55
158 11 00 00 60
158 9C 00 07 00
158 8 00 08 40
158 7 00 09 20
158 6B 00 09 40
158 5 00 02 90
158 4 00 03 40
158 3 00 02 10
158 2D 00 00 40
162 2C2 00 00 60
162 2B2 00 05 30
162 2A2 00 04 65
162 2A1 00 05 30
162 1F 00 02 90
162 1E 00 00 95
162 1D 00 00 60
171 1 00 16 95
174 00 17 60
175 01 24 00
Kilakarai 42. Kalari 392 9 00 15 75
392 10 00 01 10
392 8 00 09 80
392 1B3 00 07 20
375 5B 00 13 45
375 5A 00 06 80
375 2 00 06 70
374 5 00 06 80
374 3 00 12 60
374 2B 00 09 35
374 1C 00 04 20
376 1A 00 00 60
377 7E 00 01 10
377 7D 00 01 60
377 7C 00 01 40
377 7B 00 01 85
377 6B 00 07 70
377 6A 00 09 45
373 5B 00 01 00
373 5A 00 00 60
377 1 00 06 50
350 1 00 04 60
350 2 00 13 60
350 3 00 01 05
349 4A 00 04 50
349 7 00 04 00
349 6 00 04 30
349 5 00 08 50
349 9 00 10 50
345 1 00 01 05
346 7 00 09 00
346 6B 00 04 10
346 6A 00 05 00
346 5 00 09 30
346 4 00 19 20
341 4 00 10 65
341 2 00 07 10
341 3B 00 05 90
341 3A 00 13 20
340 9 00 03 90
331 1 00 08 50
292 4 00 08 20
292 3 00 08 20
292 2 00 08 90
287 1 00 03 50
288 2 00 13 20
288 1 00 13 90
290 2A 00 06 10
290 1 00 20 00
277 2B 00 15 80
278 4 00 11 65
278 1 00 19 20
266 2B 00 05 10
266 2C 00 12 30
266 3 00 13 00
266 4 00 12 25
264 1 00 03 20
262 5 00 22 10
262 6A 00 02 20
261 11C 00 00 45
Kilakarai 41. Kulapatham 99 1 00 00 80
100 1 00 16 00
98 2C2 00 00 80
98 7 00 08 85
98 9 00 05 55
98 8 00 06 50
97 2B 00 04 20
97 2A 00 06 40
97 1 00 05 70
2 7 00 01 30
2 6 00 04 50
2 8A 00 02 40
2 8B 00 04 00
3 3A 00 07 20
3 3B 00 08 30
3 8 00 19 20
4 5 00 00 80
4 4 00 16 80
16 3 00 05 50
17 3A 00 12 20
17 3B 00 01 00
17 2 00 14 40
17 1 00 02 70
18 1 00 07 60
19 7 00 06 00
19 10 00 09 60
21 3A 00 07 25
21 2 00 00 80
21 3B 00 04 20
21 4B 00 06 75
21 7 00 06 95
24 3 00 00 80
24 1B 00 10 10
24 2 00 01 50
30 2 00 05 75
30 5B 00 02 00
30 4 00 00 80
30 5C 00 02 20
30 5E 00 03 20
30 7 00 01 00
30 6 00 07 80
29 1 00 11 10
33 4A 00 05 10
33 4B 00 12 80
33 5 00 10 80
33 2 00 03 20
34 2A2 00 14 10
34 2B 00 07 30
37 5 00 15 15
37 4 00 00 95
36 3C 00 00 80
36 2B 00 07 80
36 2A 00 09 20
36 1A 00 13 00
36 1B 00 15 75
40 4A 00 09 55
40 3A 00 05 40
39 00 06 30
40 2 00 06 10
40 1 00 20 20
45 1A 00 07 10
Kilakarai 33. Velanur 90 1 00 04 55
90 2 00 05 25
90 3 00 03 35
90 4 00 04 85
89 1 00 06 05
89 4 00 08 25
89 5 00 05 45
91 1 00 24 20
87 1E1 00 10 25
87 2A 00 12 90
87 2B 00 11 25
87 2D 00 07 95
86 2 00 03 30
86 3D 00 04 30
84 00 16 45
83 3 00 13 15
83 4 00 11 90
85 1 00 02 10
85 2 00 00 40
81 2 00 42 45
110 2 00 28 20
110 1 00 08 00
111 1 00 13 20
111 4 00 00 40
111 3 00 06 40
76 1 00 05 45
76 2 00 29 55
76 3 00 14 35
118 1A 00 10 35
119 2 00 00 60
119 3 00 10 80
120 1 00 15 60
120 3 00 21 80
120 2 00 06 80
121 1 00 14 10
121 2 00 14 50
122 2 00 17 30
122 3 00 08 65
122 4 00 08 85
124 1 00 07 70
124 2A 00 01 60
124 3 00 00 40
123 2 00 00 50
123 3A 00 06 40
123 3B 00 05 00
123 3C 00 02 40
123 4A 00 01 85
123 4B 00 04 75
123 4C 00 04 65
126 1 00 24 45
127 2A 00 05 90
127 3 00 08 15
129 1A 00 07 00
129 1B 00 02 50
129 2B 00 05 00
129 2C 00 02 00
129 3A 00 00 70
129 3B 00 00 40
128 1B 00 12 30
128 3 00 06 80
128 4C 00 01 10
134 3 00 02 05
134 2 00 04 40
134 4 00 06 90
134 9 00 04 50
134 8 00 00 40
134 7A 00 01 30
134 7B 00 07 75
135 1C 00 10 25
135 2B 00 04 65
155 7A 00 00 45
156 2D 00 06 40
156 2C 00 00 90
156 3 00 10 70
156 6 00 11 85
156 7A 00 04 00
156 7B 00 03 80
156 7C 00 03 90
157 1A 00 03 00
157 1B 00 03 10
157 2 00 06 25
157 4A 00 01 50
157 5 00 04 20
157 6 00 02 60
157 7 00 04 10
157 8/B 00 04 00
157 8/A 00 00 40
157 8/C 00 05 30
164 2A 00 01 20
164 2B 00 04 90
164 7 00 10 80
164 8A 00 00 70
164 6 00 21 80
163 4 00 03 00
165 5 00 00 40
165 6/B 00 00 85
165 7/B 00 01 60
165 8 00 11 10
166 2A 00 00 40
166 1A 00 08 40
166 1B 00 04 75
166 3A 00 00 40
220 1A 00 04 40
221 9B 00 05 30
221 2 00 05 00
221 5 00 07 10
221 7 00 02 80
222 10B 00 01 40
222 10A 00 13 85
222 9 00 12 65
222 8 00 04 45
222 6B 00 00 40
238 1A 00 08 30
238 1B 00 01 50
224 1A1 00 22 25
226 1A 00 06 60
226 1B 00 06 45
226 2A 00 05 80
226 3A 00 02 80
229 2A 00 16 90
Kilakarai 32. Panaiyadiyendal 34 3 00 07 90
34 4 00 04 50
35 2 00 04 65
35 3E 00 09 10
43 1 00 11 20
43 2D 00 00 40
43 2C 00 04 85
43 2B 00 08 45
43 2A 00 05 70
43 2H 00 02 25
45 00 11 95
46 1B 00 00 40
46 1C 00 02 80
46 2E 00 06 25
46 3 00 07 20
49 1A 00 03 10
49 1B 00 03 20
49 1C 00 03 20
49 1D 00 04 40
49 1E 00 04 70
49 1F 00 03 80
49 1G 00 01 50
47 1A6 00 04 10
49 1H 00 00 40
47 1B2 00 05 10
47 1B3A 00 04 50
47 1B3B 00 04 90
47 12 00 01 15
47 13 00 00 60
47 14 00 00 40
47 2C 00 00 40
47 11 00 12 00
47 2D 00 01 80
47 2E 00 01 40
56 7A 00 03 10
56 7B 00 01 95
56 7C 00 02 20
56 7D 00 02 00
56 6A 00 08 10
56 4A 00 02 40
56 4B 00 04 20
56 4C 00 00 40
56 4D 00 05 05
55 1 00 09 90
57 5 00 00 40
57 6 00 00 70
57 7 00 01 70
57 10C 00 02 60
57 10B 00 05 40
58 4 00 09 30
58 3B 00 07 60
165 6 00 03 30
165 5 00 05 90
165 1C 00 00 40
165 7 00 00 50
165 4B 00 12 00
165 4A 00 00 40
155 8 00 09 10
155 9 00 08 50
155 10B 00 04 95
155 10C 00 01 90
154 12 00 06 90
157 1 00 02 50
157 2 00 04 80
154 13 00 02 10
157 3 00 08 00
153 15 00 11 50
153 16B 00 11 40
141 7A 00 08 30
141 5 00 03 20
141 8A 00 00 40
141 6B 00 10 40
140 1 00 00 40
139 2 00 04 70
139 3C 00 04 95
139 9 00 00 40
139 8 00 09 70
139 7 00 05 00
138 2B 00 00 95
138 2A 00 03 55
138 6A 00 02 30
138 6B 00 02 25
138 8A 00 02 40
138 8B 00 01 60
138 9 00 04 35
137 1A 00 28 20
203 2 00 32 80
232 4 00 27 50
231 2B 00 03 60
231 3A 00 03 50
231 3B 00 03 55
230 1 00 08 90
230 2 00 08 95
230 3A1 00 09 80
230 3A2 00 12 95
230 3B 00 11 80
230 3C 00 15 95
220 1 00 11 65
220 2A 00 03 55
220 2B 00 03 10
220 3 00 05 25
220 4 00 05 20
220 7 00 14 20
220 8A 00 05 10
220 9A 00 04 90
220 10A 00 04 85
Kadaladi 50. Sikkal 259 5E 00 00 80
260 1 00 15 40
260 2 00 06 15
258 4C 00 09 35
261 00 32 40
248 2 00 00 40
248 5 00 02 60
248 6 00 05 40
248 10 00 05 40
248 8 00 15 40
248 9 00 01 20
247 4 00 04 50
247 3 00 04 50
247 2 00 04 70
247 1 00 05 00
50 1A1 00 02 90
50 1A2 00 09 00
49 2C 00 06 85
49 2D3 00 15 40
49 2D5 00 00 40
49 2D4 00 06 25
49 2D2 00 00 40
51 1A 00 18 00
52 1A 00 17 20
52 1B 00 00 40
Kadaladi 42. Panivasal 300 2 00 26 65
300 7 00 04 00
300 3 00 07 20
300 4 00 10 45
299 6B 00 00 80
294 1 00 12 25
294 2 00 00 50
293 5 00 01 70
293 4 00 13 30
295 6A 00 04 20
295 6B 00 14 70
295 5 00 00 40
295 1C 00 11 50
296 3 00 07 20
296 4 00 00 40
296 6 00 03 00
296 5 00 10 50
289 8 00 00 40
289 7 00 03 00
289 1 00 12 00
289 2A 00 00 80
282 10 00 08 30
284 3 00 06 00
284 2 00 06 00
284 1 00 00 40
284 4 00 08 30
284 5 00 02 30
283 8B 00 11 50
283 7 00 01 30
283 6 00 10 80
283 5 00 03 25
331 4 00 01 30
331 2 00 06 70
331 1 00 08 50
272 7 00 03 80
273 1 00 08 20
250 10 00 18 20
247 2E 00 02 20
247 2F 00 04 85
247 2G 00 04 20
247 2H 00 07 60
247 2I 00 00 65
247 2K 00 12 15
247 2L 00 00 70
Kadaladi 41. Peykkulam 49 2 00 17 70
49 1 00 15 50
48 4A 00 01 30
48 4B 00 04 00
48 3C 00 07 60
50 1A 00 00 40
51 9 00 07 10
51 3C 00 03 30
51 3B 00 01 00
51 3E 00 02 80
51 3D2 00 01 80
51 3D1 00 03 80
51 8A 00 00 70
51 4B 00 12 55
51 4A 00 00 45
51 6A 00 00 40
51 5A 00 13 80
53 2C 00 00 70
53 3A 00 00 40
53 2D 00 15 10
53 2E 00 07 60
57 8 00 07 50
57 9A 00 00 40
57 7A 00 06 10
57 7B 00 07 20
57 3D 00 05 60
57 3C 00 00 40
57 6B2 00 00 40
57 6B1 00 00 80
57 4 00 02 75
57 6A 00 05 90
57 5A 00 04 90
57 5B 00 05 40
70 5A 00 10 80
70 4B 00 03 60
70 2 00 11 90
70 3A 00 01 30
70 3B 00 00 40
56 00 00 40
72 1B 00 07 40
72 1A 00 00 60
72 1C 00 11 70
76 14 00 00 40
76 15 00 07 20
76 16 00 00 40
76 5F 00 02 15
76 5E 00 00 75
76 5D 00 00 40
76 3B 00 02 20
76 3A 00 06 75
76 2A2 00 06 80
76 2A1 00 01 85
76 2B2 00 00 40
76 2B1 00 00 55
77 4 00 09 40
77 5 00 02 20
77 7A 00 03 95
83 7C 00 01 35
83 8 00 06 30
83 6E 00 03 50
83 6F 00 05 00
83 6G 00 01 35
84 8A 00 07 40
84 7A 00 04 85
84 1B 00 01 35
84 1A 00 10 75
88 10B 00 02 90
88 10A 00 03 45
88 11A 00 03 85
88 9 00 04 30
88 5 00 03 80
88 4 00 04 35
88 2C 00 00 40
88 2B 00 00 40
88 2A 00 00 40
88 3A 00 03 65
90 6B4 00 02 35
90 6B3 00 02 10
90 6B2 00 03 50
90 6B1 00 03 05
90 6A 00 00 80
89 7I 00 02 70
89 7E 00 12 00
89 6 00 15 00
89 4B 00 00 50
89 4A 00 02 35
89 5A 00 00 90
93 2C4 00 01 10
93 5B 00 09 00
93 2B4 00 01 40
93 2B3 00 01 40
93 4 00 07 50
93 2B2 00 02 65
93 3A 00 04 90
94 4K 00 00 40
94 4L 00 12 50
94 4M 00 00 55
94 4J 00 15 85
94 4E 00 06 15
94 4B 00 03 60
94 3B 00 00 40
94 2 00 02 05
95 1 00 15 90
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3895 3896 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3897 3898 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3899 3900 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3901 3902 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3903 3904 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3905 3906 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3907 3908 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3909 3910 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3911 3912 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3913 3914 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3915 3916 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3917

[F. No. R-11025(11)/99/2017-OR-I/E-8030]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3918 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 811811811811....————के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमे इसके पQात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 2025 तारीख 28.08.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 35, भाग-II, ख;ड 3, उप-ख;ड (ii) तारीख 02.09.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संलZ अनुसूची में विनि[दष्ट ओड़िशा राज्य के तहसील : कु कु ड़ाकु कु ड़ाकु कु ड़ाकु कु ड़ाख(िcid:3)डख(िcid:3)डख(िcid:3)डख(िcid:3)ड, िजला : गंजामगंजामगंजामगंजाम की भूमि में, ओड़िशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा pियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिये अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थe। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पQात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अत: अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए एतद्द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलZ अनुसूचि में विनि[दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अOजत किया जाए; और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए, यह निद'श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

तहसील- कु कु ड़ाख;िड िजला - गंजाम राज्य -ओिड़शा
गाँव का नाम प्लॉट नं. क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
1 2 3 4 5
बलरामपल्लि 8 00 00 29
11 00 00 10
37 00 01 97
36 00 03 88
44 00 04 07
27 00 00 10
31 00 01 38
53 00 03 12
60 00 01 95
57 00 02 00
58 00 03 67
91 00 02 59
90 00 01 21
92 00 01 62
95 00 01 13
100 00 02 09
101 00 01 17
106 00 01 12
भुड़rका 68 00 13 41
69 00 24 76
70 00 28 70
71 00 08 30
72 00 09 01
74 00 17 91
75 00 04 55
76 00 00 81
3226 00 00 10
3227 00 04 55
3228 00 03 21
3228/4167 00 03 74
3229 00 07 32
3245 00 00 10
3277 00 07 77
3278 00 13 74
3287 00 00 14
3287/4168 00 00 10
3280 00 07 82
3282 00 00 10
3286 00 02 39
3285/4113 00 00 84
3285/4114 00 01 60
3285 00 02 36
3298 00 00 15
3297 00 00 40
3297/4181 00 01 57
3296 00 05 87
3304 00 00 30
3305 00 02 79
3306 00 07 74
3321 00 00 49
3331 00 00 18
3322 00 09 15
3112 00 07 32
3323 00 00 43
3098 00 06 82
3325 00 00 23
3097 00 04 61
3360 00 04 87
3094 00 00 34
3497 00 03 22
3509 00 07 46
3509/4126 00 05 74
3527 00 12 76
3529 00 00 98
3526 00 06 00
3544 00 00 80
3558 00 17 77
3559 00 03 78
3560 00 01 30
3579 00 01 16
3579/4239 00 01 20
3592 00 10 18
3591 00 04 83
3589 00 00 44
3586 00 17 29
बउलझोिल 843 00 00 10
846 00 00 10
917 00 01 52
926 00 02 21
922 00 00 45
925 00 01 46
927 00 01 64
928 00 02 05
973 00 03 03
974 00 00 10
973/2288 00 02 12
976 00 02 84
977/3152 00 03 41
977 00 00 27
978 00 03 01
978/3194 00 04 86
978/3195 00 04 03
980 00 00 78
1715 00 00 84
982 00 03 00
983 00 03 10
984 00 00 16
985 00 02 53
986 00 02 63
987 00 07 13
990 00 02 64
989 00 00 80
992 00 02 24
993 00 08 29
1000 00 00 11
999 00 06 83
1000/2275 00 00 56
1002 00 02 59
1001 00 02 50
1004 00 03 80
1004/3151 00 00 10
1312/2270 00 00 10
1313 00 06 38
1317 00 00 49
1316 00 06 14
2087 00 07 17
2088 00 08 26
2089 00 04 97
म0घराहिल 97 00 00 10
110 00 00 82
111 00 08 17
112 00 04 71
122 00 01 42
215 00 01 89
223 00 03 70
209 00 20 64
192 00 15 14
193 00 08 61
पादिरिपल्ली 303 00 04 10
325 00 02 18
324 00 03 96
323 00 04 83
309 00 00 64
322 00 06 74
315 00 00 18
321 00 04 30
316 00 00 68
317 00 01 04
319 00 01 20
318 00 04 16
362 00 01 08
383 00 02 08
384 00 00 10
382 00 06 01
380 00 02 64
381 00 00 13
376 00 08 15
386/653 00 01 54
395 00 02 67
390 00 03 43
391 00 02 52
393 00 03 16
392 00 02 52
394 00 01 43
437 00 05 27
438 00 02 46
439 00 08 99
434 00 09 82
लांिजआ 743 00 01 79
742 00 00 11
744 00 08 44
752 00 01 98
745 00 02 08
750 00 00 95
749 00 03 76
751 00 04 80
757 00 03 11
748 00 00 32
758 00 06 24
769 00 00 80
806 00 01 97
805 00 02 46
804 00 01 02
803 00 00 10
770 00 00 10
802 00 03 88
801 00 03 19
828 00 01 56
828/1730 00 01 49
800 00 03 74
799 00 00 23
829 00 01 31
830 00 02 32
831 00 02 46
866 00 04 41
834 00 00 12
865 00 03 60
867 00 02 04
868 00 03 36
864 00 00 47
869 00 00 19
883 00 05 58
871 00 03 03
882 00 00 26
877 00 05 16
879 00 05 24
878 00 04 74
1029 00 01 75
1030 00 02 25
1028 00 00 10
1022 00 02 87
1023 00 00 10
1031 00 00 32
1020 00 00 66
1021 00 00 79
1034 00 01 03
1041 00 02 12
1040 00 02 29
1039 00 01 15
1038 00 04 19
1044 00 00 21
1137 00 03 68
1138 00 00 10
1134 00 03 09
1136 00 01 10
1135 00 01 48
1133 00 01 27
1132 00 05 42
1126 00 01 87
1131 00 01 28
1130 00 02 40
1129 00 01 86
1128 00 01 69
1207 00 01 63
1209 00 02 44
1206 00 03 10
1211 00 02 64
1212 00 01 39
1213 00 01 60
1214 00 04 07
1215 00 06 80
1216 00 04 60
1224 00 01 78
1225 00 03 42
1223 00 01 82
1369 00 06 80
1369/1436 00 02 09
1370 00 04 27
1351 00 02 59
1349 00 02 68
1344 00 10 60
1322 00 02 59
1323 00 04 31
1324 00 02 22
1325 00 01 79
1326 00 03 22
1327 00 01 15
1328 00 00 55
1318 00 01 31
1313 00 01 20
1314 00 01 15
1308 00 00 95
1310 00 00 10
1306 00 01 07
1309 00 00 17
1298 00 00 49
1305 00 01 02
1304 00 01 71
1299 00 00 73
1300 00 00 77
1301 00 00 54
1302 00 02 73
1296 00 01 25
1295 00 01 46
1294 00 01 34
1293 00 01 41
भगबानपुर 563 00 04 94
538 00 04 05
539 00 09 28
540 00 01 04
537 00 00 25
519 00 11 03
535/808 00 06 15
572 00 02 53
573 00 05 60
533 00 01 80
574/860 00 03 24
574/859 00 02 82
574/1179 00 01 54
574 00 01 29
576 00 08 40
576/895 00 01 17
577 00 19 81
578 00 02 40
579 00 02 22
579/1185 00 00 94
580 00 06 20
582 00 05 88
583 00 11 63
586 00 16 32
588 00 03 97
616 00 10 81
615 00 10 31
618 00 11 39
620 00 08 66
649 00 08 91
668 00 02 26
669 00 00 56
662 00 00 53
663 00 01 06
661 00 03 15
372 00 02 40
371 00 05 96
367 00 00 67
297 00 02 21
298 00 06 16
299/791 00 00 60
` 208 00 01 24
209 00 07 76
205 00 00 94
206 00 07 54
207 00 05 58
202 00 05 82
201 00 04 66
201/970 00 00 10
200 00 02 60
692 00 02 61
198 00 01 16
197 00 02 00
196 00 07 35
187 00 00 70
728 00 00 28
728/790 00 05 84
727 00 01 24
729 00 12 72
190 00 00 10
730 00 02 20
748 00 08 05
750 00 04 50
751/890 00 05 41
755 00 06 71
756 00 05 43
754/778 00 00 44
756/888 00 05 87
756/887 00 02 70
759/772 00 05 80
760 00 14 00
759 00 05 09
761 00 01 95
762/845 00 06 85
762/846 00 04 36
763 00 00 72
अनन्ताइ 1365 00 03 14
1366 00 04 64
1367 00 02 00
1367/2328 00 05 15
1367/2330 00 05 15
1476 00 04 03
1433 00 08 65
1438 00 03 62
1438/2193 00 02 50
1437 00 01 36
1435/2175 00 00 51
1435 00 00 51
1449 00 08 06
1450 00 08 96
1458 00 07 25
1456 00 00 37
1457 00 00 50
1455 00 02 75
1453 00 00 58
1454 00 02 90
1466 00 04 61
1591 00 00 17
1590 00 09 45
1599 00 00 10
1589 00 00 10
1606 00 06 08
1584 00 12 45
1583 00 00 10
1582 00 03 63
1610 00 01 42
1579 00 03 46
1580 00 00 55
1580/1796 00 02 13
1578 00 02 22
1613 00 00 56
1577 00 04 56
1576 00 01 69
1575 00 00 77
1544 00 00 10
1545 00 06 54
1546 00 04 11
1547 00 00 10
1548 00 02 17
1571 00 03 90
1571/2187 00 01 55
1560 00 04 02
1560/2157 00 02 64
1552 00 01 26
1553 00 06 67
1554 00 04 45
1557 00 00 36
1555 00 02 56
781 00 05 32
736 00 00 70
739 00 06 89
740 00 04 08
741 00 01 30
743 00 09 01
744 00 04 08
745 00 02 30
754 00 07 84
बन्थपल्लि 1154 00 00 63
1159 00 04 38
1153/2538 00 01 18
1161 00 02 23
1161/3007 00 06 68
1166 00 06 20
1164 00 01 00
1165 00 05 17
1145 00 02 97
1146 00 02 68
1147 00 00 10
1147/2762 00 00 10
1144 00 09 27
1135 00 06 34
1135/1953 00 01 05
1139 00 02 73
1139/2552 00 02 73
1140 00 01 50
1180 00 05 20
1138 00 00 10
1138/2121 00 00 10
1181 00 01 50
1215 00 01 54
1210 00 01 66
1210/2511 00 00 53
1210/2884 00 00 10
1210/2885 00 02 66
1210/3006 00 03 09
1210/3009 00 03 09
1210/3016 00 02 97
1219 00 01 57
1224 00 07 64
1226 00 00 26
1227 00 00 20
1222 00 04 18
1703 00 08 65
1709 00 00 16
1701 00 00 10
1708 00 05 28
1705 00 00 20
1707 00 06 49
1757 00 03 39
1759 00 01 90
चकु ;डाझोला 165 00 13 15
165/399 00 01 03
169 00 21 32
169/424 00 01 53
169/427 00 01 40
169/428 00 01 30
169/429 00 01 53
201/371 00 08 49
201/370 00 13 70
202 00 01 26
202/366 00 00 30
202/368 00 02 84
207 00 11 29
211 00 01 71
211/337 00 04 87
209 00 16 86
क ु सुिम 8/1124 00 10 79
8/1124/1346 00 09 50
8 00 00 23
105/1125 00 01 49
106 00 00 38
104 00 00 89
104/1295/1612 00 02 70
104/1369 00 01 65
104/1370 00 04 85
104/1653 00 03 59
104/1654 00 01 08
104/1295 00 13 69
1294 00 12 26
1292 00 15 80
86 00 00 10
85 00 05 19
84 00 01 06
80 00 00 70
81 00 01 78
83/1136 00 03 67
82 00 00 88
83 00 03 40
311 00 02 70
310 00 02 29
309 00 02 36
312 00 06 20
308 00 00 92
313 00 00 96
318 00 15 41
320 00 02 72
326 00 00 10
325 00 10 76
335 00 05 08
328 00 13 80
332 00 01 79
331 00 10 95
330 00 00 13
330/1642 00 00 10
342/966 00 02 21
343 00 15 38
343/1345 00 00 60
343/1371 00 00 85
343/1585 00 00 83
344 00 18 04
292 00 01 84
292/1457 00 02 23
292/1537 00 01 53
292/1547 00 00 76
292/1551 00 00 46
292/1548 00 01 40
292/1549 00 02 75
292/1623 00 01 68
291 00 00 11
291/1077 00 15 47
291/1613 00 00 65
291/1640 00 01 54
430 00 06 12
430/1376 00 03 05
430/1403 00 04 56
431 00 08 41
431/1377 00 02 96
448 00 04 45
447/1334 00 04 19
1071 00 04 73
446/1332 00 01 72
445 00 03 00
445/1602 00 03 49
445/1604 00 22 27
440 00 02 55
अजु र्नपुर 11 00 03 76
13 00 00 16
22 00 12 54
90 00 09 94
92 00 00 77
91 00 02 94
85 00 16 33
88 00 00 12
84 00 03 49
83 00 05 88
98 00 09 42
99 00 02 33
126 00 01 58
जुगुिड़ 570 00 06 70
580 00 15 75
577 00 10 39
1835 00 16 54
1830 00 09 85
1831 00 01 73
1836 00 00 67
1838 00 15 85
1840 00 00 22
1841 00 06 47
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3919 3920 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3921 3922 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3923 3924 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3925 3926 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3927 3928 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3929 3930 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3931 3932 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3933 3934 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3935

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 811.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 35 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 02.09.2017 vide S.O. Number 2025 dated 28.08.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intension to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil-Kukudakhandi, District-Ganjam in Odisha State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telengana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Tehsil: KUKUDAKHANDI District : GANJAM State : ODISHA
Name of the Village Plot No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5
BALARAMPALLI 8 00 00 29
11 00 00 10
37 00 01 97
36 00 03 88
44 00 04 07
27 00 00 10
31 00 01 38
53 00 03 12
60 00 01 95
57 00 02 00
58 00 03 67
91 00 02 59
90 00 01 21
92 00 01 62
95 00 01 13
100 00 02 09
101 00 01 17
106 00 01 12
BHUDUKA 68 00 13 41
69 00 24 76
70 00 28 70
71 00 08 30
72 00 09 01
74 00 17 91
75 00 04 55
76 00 00 81
3226 00 00 10
3227 00 04 55
3228 00 03 21
3228/4167 00 03 74
3229 00 07 32
3245 00 00 10
3277 00 07 77
3278 00 13 74
3287 00 00 14
3287/4168 00 00 10
3280 00 07 82
3282 00 00 10
3286 00 02 39
3285/4113 00 00 84
3285/4114 00 01 60
3285 00 02 36
3298 00 00 15
3297 00 00 40
3297/4181 00 01 57
3296 00 05 87
3304 00 00 30
3305 00 02 79
3306 00 07 74
3321 00 00 49
3331 00 00 18
3322 00 09 15
3112 00 07 32
3323 00 00 43
3098 00 06 82
3325 00 00 23
3097 00 04 61
3360 00 04 87
3094 00 00 34
3497 00 03 22
3509 00 07 46
3509/4126 00 05 74
3527 00 12 76
3529 00 00 98
3526 00 06 00
3544 00 00 80
3558 00 17 77
3559 00 03 78
3560 00 01 30
3579 00 01 16
3579/4239 00 01 20
3592 00 10 18
3591 00 04 83
3589 00 00 44
3586 00 17 29
BAULAJHOLI 843 00 00 10
846 00 00 10
917 00 01 52
926 00 02 21
922 00 00 45
925 00 01 46
927 00 01 64
928 00 02 05
973 00 03 03
974 00 00 10
973/2288 00 02 12
976 00 02 84
977/3152 00 03 41
977 00 00 27
978 00 03 01
978/3194 00 04 86
978/3195 00 04 03
980 00 00 78
1715 00 00 84
982 00 03 00
983 00 03 10
984 00 00 16
985 00 02 53
986 00 02 63
987 00 07 13
990 00 02 64
989 00 00 80
992 00 02 24
993 00 08 29
1000 00 00 11
999 00 06 83
1000/2275 00 00 56
1002 00 02 59
1001 00 02 50
1004 00 03 80
1004/3151 00 00 10
1312/2270 00 00 10
1313 00 06 38
1317 00 00 49
1316 00 06 14
2087 00 07 17
2088 00 08 26
2089 00 04 97
MAHUGHARA HILL 97 00 00 10
110 00 00 82
111 00 08 17
112 00 04 71
122 00 01 42
215 00 01 89
223 00 03 70
209 00 20 64
192 00 15 14
193 00 08 61
PADIRIPALLI 303 00 04 10
325 00 02 18
324 00 03 96
323 00 04 83
309 00 00 64
322 00 06 74
315 00 00 18
321 00 04 30
316 00 00 68
317 00 01 04
319 00 01 20
318 00 04 16
362 00 01 08
383 00 02 08
384 00 00 10
382 00 06 01
380 00 02 64
381 00 00 13
376 00 08 15
386/653 00 01 54
395 00 02 67
390 00 03 43
391 00 02 52
393 00 03 16
392 00 02 52
394 00 01 43
437 00 05 27
438 00 02 46
439 00 08 99
434 00 09 82
LANJIA 743 00 01 79
742 00 00 11
744 00 08 44
752 00 01 98
745 00 02 08
750 00 00 95
749 00 03 76
751 00 04 80
757 00 03 11
748 00 00 32
758 00 06 24
769 00 00 80
806 00 01 97
805 00 02 46
804 00 01 02
803 00 00 10
770 00 00 10
802 00 03 88
801 00 03 19
828 00 01 56
828/1730 00 01 49
800 00 03 74
799 00 00 23
829 00 01 31
830 00 02 32
831 00 02 46
866 00 04 41
834 00 00 12
865 00 03 60
867 00 02 04
868 00 03 36
864 00 00 47
869 00 00 19
883 00 05 58
871 00 03 03
882 00 00 26
877 00 05 16
879 00 05 24
878 00 04 74
1029 00 01 75
1030 00 02 25
1028 00 00 10
1022 00 02 87
1023 00 00 10
1031 00 00 32
1020 00 00 66
1021 00 00 79
1034 00 01 03
1041 00 02 12
1040 00 02 29
1039 00 01 15
1038 00 04 19
1044 00 00 21
1137 00 03 68
1138 00 00 10
1134 00 03 09
1136 00 01 10
1135 00 01 48
1133 00 01 27
1132 00 05 42
1126 00 01 87
1131 00 01 28
1130 00 02 40
1129 00 01 86
1128 00 01 69
1207 00 01 63
1209 00 02 44
1206 00 03 10
1211 00 02 64
1212 00 01 39
1213 00 01 60
1214 00 04 07
1215 00 06 80
1216 00 04 60
1224 00 01 78
1225 00 03 42
1223 00 01 82
1369 00 06 80
1369/1436 00 02 09
1370 00 04 27
1351 00 02 59
1349 00 02 68
1344 00 10 60
1322 00 02 59
1323 00 04 31
1324 00 02 22
1325 00 01 79
1326 00 03 22
1327 00 01 15
1328 00 00 55
1318 00 01 31
1313 00 01 20
1314 00 01 15
1308 00 00 95
1310 00 00 10
1306 00 01 07
1309 00 00 17
1298 00 00 49
1305 00 01 02
1304 00 01 71
1299 00 00 73
1300 00 00 77
1301 00 00 54
1302 00 02 73
1296 00 01 25
1295 00 01 46
1294 00 01 34
1293 00 01 41
BHAGABANPUR 563 00 04 94
538 00 04 05
539 00 09 28
540 00 01 04
537 00 00 25
519 00 11 03
535/808 00 06 15
572 00 02 53
573 00 05 60
533 00 01 80
574/860 00 03 24
574/859 00 02 82
574/1179 00 01 54
574 00 01 29
576 00 08 40
576/895 00 01 17
577 00 19 81
578 00 02 40
579 00 02 22
579/1185 00 00 94
580 00 06 20
582 00 05 88
583 00 11 63
586 00 16 32
588 00 03 97
616 00 10 81
615 00 10 31
618 00 11 39
620 00 08 66
649 00 08 91
668 00 02 26
669 00 00 56
662 00 00 53
663 00 01 06
661 00 03 15
372 00 02 40
371 00 05 96
367 00 00 67
297 00 02 21
298 00 06 16
299/791 00 00 60
` 208 00 01 24
209 00 07 76
205 00 00 94
206 00 07 54
207 00 05 58
202 00 05 82
201 00 04 66
201/970 00 00 10
200 00 02 60
692 00 02 61
198 00 01 16
197 00 02 00
196 00 07 35
187 00 00 70
728 00 00 28
728/790 00 05 84
727 00 01 24
729 00 12 72
190 00 00 10
730 00 02 20
748 00 08 05
750 00 04 50
751/890 00 05 41
755 00 06 71
756 00 05 43
754/778 00 00 44
756/888 00 05 87
756/887 00 02 70
759/772 00 05 80
760 00 14 00
759 00 05 09
761 00 01 95
762/845 00 06 85
762/846 00 04 36
763 00 00 72
ANANTAYI 1365 00 03 14
1366 00 04 64
1367 00 02 00
1367/2328 00 05 15
1367/2330 00 05 15
1476 00 04 03
1433 00 08 65
1438 00 03 62
1438/2193 00 02 50
1437 00 01 36
1435/2175 00 00 51
1435 00 00 51
1449 00 08 06
1450 00 08 96
1458 00 07 25
1456 00 00 37
1457 00 00 50
1455 00 02 75
1453 00 00 58
1454 00 02 90
1466 00 04 61
1591 00 00 17
1590 00 09 45
1599 00 00 10
1589 00 00 10
1606 00 06 08
1584 00 12 45
1583 00 00 10
1582 00 03 63
1610 00 01 42
1579 00 03 46
1580 00 00 55
1580/1796 00 02 13
1578 00 02 22
1613 00 00 56
1577 00 04 56
1576 00 01 69
1575 00 00 77
1544 00 00 10
1545 00 06 54
1546 00 04 11
1547 00 00 10
1548 00 02 17
1571 00 03 90
1571/2187 00 01 55
1560 00 04 02
1560/2157 00 02 64
1552 00 01 26
1553 00 06 67
1554 00 04 45
1557 00 00 36
1555 00 02 56
781 00 05 32
736 00 00 70
739 00 06 89
740 00 04 08
741 00 01 30
743 00 09 01
744 00 04 08
745 00 02 30
754 00 07 84
BONTAPALLI 1154 00 00 63
1159 00 04 38
1153/2538 00 01 18
1161 00 02 23
1161/3007 00 06 68
1166 00 06 20
1164 00 01 00
1165 00 05 17
1145 00 02 97
1146 00 02 68
1147 00 00 10
1147/2762 00 00 10
1144 00 09 27
1135 00 06 34
1135/1953 00 01 05
1139 00 02 73
1139/2552 00 02 73
1140 00 01 50
1180 00 05 20
1138 00 00 10
1138/2121 00 00 10
1181 00 01 50
1215 00 01 54
1210 00 01 66
1210/2511 00 00 53
1210/2884 00 00 10
1210/2885 00 02 66
1210/3006 00 03 09
1210/3009 00 03 09
1210/3016 00 02 97
1219 00 01 57
1224 00 07 64
1226 00 00 26
1227 00 00 20
1222 00 04 18
1703 00 08 65
1709 00 00 16
1701 00 00 10
1708 00 05 28
1705 00 00 20
1707 00 06 49
1757 00 03 39
1759 00 01 90
CHAKUNDAJHOLA 165 00 13 15
165/399 00 01 03
169 00 21 32
169/424 00 01 53
169/427 00 01 40
169/428 00 01 30
169/429 00 01 53
201/371 00 08 49
201/370 00 13 70
202 00 01 26
202/366 00 00 30
202/368 00 02 84
207 00 11 29
211 00 01 71
211/337 00 04 87
209 00 16 86
KUSUMI 8/1124 00 10 79
8/1124/1346 00 09 50
8 00 00 23
105/1125 00 01 49
106 00 00 38
104 00 00 89
104/1295/1612 00 02 70
104/1369 00 01 65
104/1370 00 04 85
104/1653 00 03 59
104/1654 00 01 08
104/1295 00 13 69
1294 00 12 26
1292 00 15 80
86 00 00 10
85 00 05 19
84 00 01 06
80 00 00 70
81 00 01 78
83/1136 00 03 67
82 00 00 88
83 00 03 40
311 00 02 70
310 00 02 29
309 00 02 36
312 00 06 20
308 00 00 92
313 00 00 96
318 00 15 41
320 00 02 72
326 00 00 10
325 00 10 76
335 00 05 08
328 00 13 80
332 00 01 79
331 00 10 95
330 00 00 13
330/1642 00 00 10
342/966 00 02 21
343 00 15 38
343/1345 00 00 60
343/1371 00 00 85
343/1585 00 00 83
344 00 18 04
292 00 01 84
292/1457 00 02 23
292/1537 00 01 53
292/1547 00 00 76
292/1551 00 00 46
292/1548 00 01 40
292/1549 00 02 75
292/1623 00 01 68
291 00 00 11
291/1077 00 15 47
291/1613 00 00 65
291/1640 00 01 54
430 00 06 12
430/1376 00 03 05
430/1403 00 04 56
431 00 08 41
431/1377 00 02 96
448 00 04 45
447/1334 00 04 19
1071 00 04 73
446/1332 00 01 72
445 00 03 00
445/1602 00 03 49
445/1604 00 22 27
440 00 02 55
ARJUNAPUR 11 00 03 76
13 00 00 16
22 00 12 54
90 00 09 94
92 00 00 77
91 00 02 94
85 00 16 33
88 00 00 12
84 00 03 49
83 00 05 88
98 00 09 42
99 00 02 33
126 00 01 58
JUGUDI 570 00 06 70
580 00 15 75
577 00 10 39
1835 00 16 54
1830 00 09 85
1831 00 01 73
1836 00 00 67
1838 00 15 85
1840 00 00 22
1841 00 06 47
3936 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3937 3938 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3939 3940 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3941 3942 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3943 3944 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3945 3946 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3947 3948 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3949

[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3950 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 812812812812.... ———— dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbZiykbZu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dk /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjr ds jkti= Hkkx II] [k.M 3] mi[k.M ¼ii½ rkjh[k 16 Qjojh 2017 ess i`"B 8 ij izdkf'kr Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkÑfrd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la- dk- vk- 493¼v½ rkjh[k 8 Qjojh] 2017 esa fuEufyf[kr la'kks/ku djrh gS] vFkkZr~ %& mDr vf/klwpuk dh vuqlwph esa %&

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

Rkglhy& MHkk¢bZ ftyk& oMk¢njk jkT; & XkqTkjkr ds LFkku ij

i

e©tk@ xzke lo¢Z uaCkj e©tk@ xzke lo¢Z uaCkj N=ky

221 N=ky 211 ¼250 u;k½

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/104/2017-ओआर-I/ई-8039]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 812.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, number S. O. 493(E) dated 8th February 2017, published at page 19 in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated 16th February 2017, namely:-

In the Schedule to the said notification:-

SCHEDULE

Tehsil:- Dabhoi District:- Vadodara State:- Gujarat For

Read

Mouja/Village                  Survey Number         Mouja/Village             Survey Number
Chhatral                       221                   Chhatral                  211 (250 New)

[F. No. R-11025(11)/104/2017-OR-I/E-8039]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 813813813813....————कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंu प्रदेश राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के pियान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कें (cid:12)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के िलए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूिम में जो इस से ऊपाबd अनुसूची में वOणत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार,पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3951

कोई भी xक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वOणत भूमि में हितबd है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इiीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में zी के . ए. एस जेन्निसन, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (आंu प्रदेश),इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 33, कनका दुर्गा ऑफिसर्स कॉलोनी, गुIनानक नगर मेन रोड िवजयवाड़ा-520008, आंu प्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा|

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

जिला: कृ ष्णा राज्य: आन्u प्रदेश
मंडलका नाम Cाम का नाम सव` नम्बर क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
छत्रय बुIगुगूडेम 53/8 00 07 24
ए.कोंडूI माधवरम वेस्ट 185/1 00 36 34
220 00 50 53
जी.कोन्डूरू चेवुटूI 52/4C 00 00 01
54/4 00 14 67
72/1B 00 02 75
72/1A 00 06 72
73/2B 00 01 94
73/2A 00 12 61
जी.कोन्डूरू कोन्डूरू 21/2 00 05 96
21/1B 00 04 48
21/1A 00 25 06
30/1 00 06 32
29/1 00 20 86
29/2 00 00 50
36 00 04 68
35/1 00 00 99
37/4 00 19 77
38/1 00 02 86
43/3 00 16 73
44/3A 00 13 90
44/2 00 12 33
44/4B1 00 05 71
44/4A 00 04 78
46 00 00 75
52/2 00 06 78
56/1C 00 05 00
जी.कोन्डूरू ग|ामनुगु 51/3 00 05 41
52/5 00 28 95
53/2 00 25 45
46/2 00 20 00
जी.कोन्डूरू मुनगापाडु 148/A2B 00 08 34
जी.कोन्डूरू लोया 99/2B1 00 11 85
पेनुगंचिप्रोलु पेनुगंचिप्रोलु 328/1B 00 23 22
328/1A 00 23 31
वत्सवाई भीमावरम 434/2 00 00 53
25/2D 00 16 07
25/2C 00 04 72
25/1B 00 18 30
जग्ग~यापेटा बल्सुपाडू 69/3C/1B 00 07 83
3952 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 813.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesha pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. K.A.S Jennyson, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 33, Kanaka Durga officer's Colony,Gurunank Nagar Main Road, Vijayawada -520008 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3953 Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

District : Krishna State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal Name of Village Survey No. Area
Hectare Are Square Metre
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Chatrai Burugugudem 53/8 00 07 24
A.Konduru Madhavaram West 185/1 00 36 34
220 00 50 53
G. Konduru Chevuturu 52/4C 00 00 01
54/4 00 14 67
72/1B 00 02 75
72/1A 00 06 72
73/2B 00 01 94
73/2A 00 12 61
G. Konduru Konduru 21/2 00 05 96
21/1B 00 04 48
21/1A 00 25 06
30/1 00 06 32
29/1 00 20 86
29/2 00 00 50
36 00 04 68
35/1 00 00 99
37/4 00 19 77
38/1 00 02 86
43/3 00 16 73
44/3A 00 13 90
44/2 00 12 33
44/4B1 00 05 71
44/4A 00 04 78
46 00 00 75
52/2 00 06 78
56/1C 00 05 00
G. Konduru Gaddamanugu 51/3 00 05 41
52/5 00 28 95
53/2 00 25 45
46/2 00 20 00
G.Konduru Munagapadu 148/A2B 00 08 34
G.Konduru Loya 99/2B1 00 11 85
Penuganchiprolu Penuganchiprolu 328/1B 00 23 22
328/1A 00 23 31
Vatsavai Bhimavaram 434/2 00 00 53
25/2D 00 16 07
25/2C 00 04 72
25/1B 00 18 30
Jaggayyapeta Balsupadu 69/3C/1b 00 07 83
3954 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 814814814814....———— के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पQात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 2098 तारीख 06.09.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 36, भाग II, ख;ड 3, उप ख;ड (ii) तारीख 09.09.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संलZ अनुसूची में विनि[दष्ट आंuप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : जी.कोन्डूरू िजला: कृ ष्णा की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा pियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थe। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।

और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पQात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिष्चय किया है:

अतः अब, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए एत(cid:128)ारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलZ अनुसूचि में विनि[दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अOजत किया जाए:

और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 0ए, यह निद'श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपUरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

जिला: कृ ष्णा राज्य: आन्u प्रदेश
मंडल का नाम Cाम का नाम सव` नम्बर क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
जी.कोन्डूरू कोन्डूरू 43/6 00 05 37
45/1 00 00 09
47 00 44 02
48/1 00 45 14
53/1 00 26 06
78/1A 00 21 50
54/1 00 06 62
54/2A 00 14 47
54/2B 00 04 43
54/2C 00 06 68
61/1 00 29 55
61/2 00 00 29
60/4 00 13 04
60/3 00 17 85
60/2 00 02 02
56/4 00 23 71
जी.कोन्डूरू ग|ामनुगु 40/B 2 00 06 79
40/B 1 00 10 97
40/ A 00 01 07
13 00 30 68
15/1 A 00 02 39
15/1 F 00 14 36
15/1 G 00 00 03
15/1 E 00 03 72
15/1 D 00 03 40
15/1 C 00 04 42
15/1 B 00 04 18
18/1 00 19 40
19 00 40 02
20/3 00 04 07
132/1B 00 17 51
132/2A 00 16 09
132/3C 00 15 15
136/A 5B 00 09 25
136/A 4 A 00 11 32
136/A 3 A/2 00 05 08
136/A 3 C/1 00 01 32
136/A 2 C 00 02 90
136/B 1 00 10 95
162/2 A 00 02 95
162/2 B 00 06 92
163/1 00 23 91
162/2 C 00 25 82
153/2C 00 02 47
153/1A3 00 17 05
जी.कोन्डूरू चेIवु माधवरम 81/3 00 05 41
81/2.B 00 11 23
81/2.A 00 02 63
86/2 00 22 98
169/1 00 29 79
169/2 00 08 84
169/3 00 07 41
172/4 00 19 77
175/2 00 23 69
175/1 00 04 81
175/3 00 00 63
176 00 39 05
जी.कोन्डूरू कवुलूI 17/1 00 01 46
18/1A 00 08 82
18/2A 00 16 22
18/3A 00 09 39
18/4 00 11 35
19/2A 00 12 07
19/2B 00 06 67
19/2C 00 08 89
19/2D 00 16 04
50/2A 00 06 23
50/2B 00 10 08
50/3 00 17 09
50/4 00 07 58
51/1A 00 02 56
51/2 00 13 61
51/3 00 15 11
65/1 00 13 51
65/2 00 03 97
63/1 00 08 45
63/4 00 06 22
63/3 00 01 41
63/6 00 03 53
63/9 00 00 05
63/7 00 04 07
63/8 00 17 44
63/19 00 00 06
63/20 00 00 06
64/2B 00 09 76
64/2C 00 12 22
64/3 00 00 76
49/1B 00 00 06
50/1B 00 04 13
50/1A 00 01 50
49/2A 00 00 64
44 00 12 44
जी.कोन्डूरू लोया 95/1B 00 04 65
96/2 00 30 36
99/1B 00 14 10
99/2B3 00 00 42
102/1B 00 09 54
105 00 01 27
124/1 00 10 95
126/13 00 02 91
126/12 00 04 74
126/10 00 08 08
126/9 00 06 76
126/8 00 00 68
126/6 00 01 18
126/7 00 06 60
126/4 00 03 05
126/3 00 05 69
126/2 00 06 20
126/1 00 08 60
127 00 41 71
130/2 00 28 26
130/1 00 17 81
117 00 07 64
114/2 00 11 79
114/1 00 24 34
87/2C3 00 03 25
87/2B 00 05 14
87/2C1 00 02 59
56/2 00 13 46
57/2 00 20 46
56/1A 00 18 88
55/2 00 07 56
40/2 00 36 24
39 00 19 96
38/1B 00 21 92
10 00 02 35
11/1C1 00 26 90
12 00 06 08
8 00 32 61
16 00 12 15
18/3C 00 14 77
18/3A 00 62 60
जी.कोन्डूरू सुन्नमपाडु 13 00 00 88
15 00 46 21
76/1 00 42 36
जी.कोन्डूरू दुग्गिरालापाडु 69 00 40 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3955 3956 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3957 3958 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3959

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018

S.O. 814.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No.36 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 09.09.2017 vide S.O. Number 2098 dated 06.09.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal G.Konduru District Krishna in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".

And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

3960 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District : Krishna State : Andhra Pradesh
Name of Mandal Name of Village Survey No. Area
Hectare Are Square Metre
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
G. Konduru Konduru 43/6 00 05 37
45/1 00 00 09
47 00 44 02
48/1 00 45 14
53/1 00 26 06
78/1A 00 21 50
54/1 00 06 62
54/2A 00 14 47
54/2B 00 04 43
54/2C 00 06 68
61/1 00 29 55
61/2 00 00 29
60/4 00 13 04
60/3 00 17 85
60/2 00 02 02
56/4 00 23 71
G.Konduru Gaddamanugu 40/B 2 00 06 79
40/B 1 00 10 97
40/ A 00 01 07
13 00 30 68
15/1 A 00 02 39
15/1 F 00 14 36
15/1 G 00 00 03
15/1 E 00 03 72
15/1 D 00 03 40
15/1 C 00 04 42
15/1 B 00 04 18
18/1 00 19 40
19 00 40 02
20/3 00 04 07
132/1B 00 17 51
132/2A 00 16 09
132/3C 00 15 15
136/A 5B 00 09 25
136/A 4 A 00 11 32
136/A 3 A/2 00 05 08
136/A 3 C/1 00 01 32
136/A 2 C 00 02 90
136/B 1 00 10 95
162/2 A 00 02 95
162/2 B 00 06 92
163/1 00 23 91
162/2 C 00 25 82
153/2C 00 02 47
153/1A3 00 17 05
G.Konduru Cheruvu Madhavaram 81/3 00 05 41
81/2.B 00 11 23
81/2.A 00 02 63
86/2 00 22 98
169/1 00 29 79
169/2 00 08 84
169/3 00 07 41
172/4 00 19 77
175/2 00 23 69
175/1 00 04 81
175/3 00 00 63
176 00 39 05
G.Konduru Kavuluru 17/1 00 01 46
18/1A 00 08 82
18/2A 00 16 22
18/3A 00 09 39
18/4 00 11 35
19/2A 00 12 07
19/2B 00 06 67
19/2C 00 08 89
19/2D 00 16 04
50/2A 00 06 23
50/2B 00 10 08
50/3 00 17 09
50/4 00 07 58
51/1A 00 02 56
51/2 00 13 61
51/3 00 15 11
65/1 00 13 51
65/2 00 03 97
63/1 00 08 45
63/4 00 06 22
63/3 00 01 41
63/6 00 03 53
63/9 00 00 05
63/7 00 04 07
63/8 00 17 44
63/19 00 00 06
63/20 00 00 06
64/2B 00 09 76
64/2C 00 12 22
64/3 00 00 76
49/1B 00 00 06
50/1B 00 04 13
50/1A 00 01 50
49/2A 00 00 64
44 00 12 44
G.Konduru Loya 95/1B 00 04 65
96/2 00 30 36
99/1B 00 14 10
99/2B3 00 00 42
102/1B 00 09 54
105 00 01 27
124/1 00 10 95
126/13 00 02 91
126/12 00 04 74
126/10 00 08 08
126/9 00 06 76
126/8 00 00 68
126/6 00 01 18
126/7 00 06 60
126/4 00 03 05
126/3 00 05 69
126/2 00 06 20
126/1 00 08 60
127 00 41 71
130/2 00 28 26
130/1 00 17 81
117 00 07 64
114/2 00 11 79
114/1 00 24 34
87/2C3 00 03 25
87/2B 00 05 14
87/2C1 00 02 59
56/2 00 13 46
57/2 00 20 46
56/1A 00 18 88
55/2 00 07 56
40/2 00 36 24
39 00 19 96
38/1B 00 21 92
10 00 02 35
11/1C1 00 26 90
12 00 06 08
8 00 32 61
16 00 12 15
18/3C 00 14 77
18/3A 00 62 60
G. Konduru Sunnampadu 13 00 00 88
15 00 46 21
76/1 00 42 36
G. Konduru Duggiralapadu 69 00 40 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3961 3962 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 3963

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.

3964 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्राालय

नई दिल्ली, 7 मई, 2018

का.आ. 815.—केन्द्र सरकार, राजभाषा ;संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोगद्ध नियम, 1976 ;यथासंशोध्ति, 1987द्ध के नियम 10 के उप-नियम ;4द्ध के अनुसरण में, श्रम और रोजगार मंत्राालय के प्रशासकीय नियंत्राणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतत्‌द्वारा अध्सिूचित करती हैः

01. शाखा कार्यालय, पठानकोट

02. शाखा कार्यालय, होशियारपुर

03. शाखा कार्यालय, अमृतसर

[सं. ई-11016/1/2017-रा.भा.नी.]

देवेन्द्र सह, आर्थिक सलाहकार MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 7th May, 2018

S.O. 815.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

01. Branch Office, Pathankot

02. Branch Office, Hoshiyarpur

03. Branch Office, Amritsar

[No. E-11016/1/2017-RBN]

DEVENDER SINGH, Economic Adviser

नई दिल्ली, 14 मई, 2018

का.आ. 816.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑपफ राजस्थान लिमिटेड प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण जयपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 09/98द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/177/96-आईआर ;बी-Iद्ध]

बी.एस. बिष्ट, अनुभाग अध्किारी

New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018

S.O. 816.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.

[No. L-12012/177/96-IR (B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Section Officer

vuqca/kvuqca/kvuqca/kvuqca/k

dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kfdsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kfdsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kfdsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;i/kdj.k] t;i/kdj.k] t;i/kdj.k] t;iqjqjqjqj

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%& fxjh'k dqekj 'kekZ] vkj-,p-ts-,l-

dsl uacj lhdsl uacj lhdsl uacj lhdsl uacj lh----vkbZvkbZvkbZvkbZ----VhVhVhVh---- 09@9809@9809@9809@98

lhlhlhlh----vkbZvkbZvkbZvkbZ----,l,l,l,l---- 03@1403@1403@1403@14

jSQjSal%jSQjSal%jSQjSal%jSQjSal% dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh dk vkns'k dzekad ,y-&12012@177@96 vkbZ-vkj-[ch-] dsUnz ljdkj] fnukad 1-10-97 vukfn dkSf'kd iq= Jh ,y-,l- dkSf'kd fuoklh&13] 'kkyhekj ckx] vtesj jksM] ghjkiqjk] t;iqjA ------------izkFkhZAizkFkhZAizkFkhZAizkFkhZA3965 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 cuke cuke cuke cuke

¼1½ cSad vkWQ jktLFkku OkrZeku eas vkbZ-lh-vkbZ-lh-vkbZ- cSad fy- tfj;s

tujy eSustj pkSew gkml] lh&Ldhe] t;iqjA

¼2½ eSustj] cSad vkWQ jktLFkku] m|ksx Hkou] fryd ekxZ] t;iqjA

---foi{khx.kfoi{khx.kfoi{khx.kfoi{khx.kA A A A mifLFkr %mifLFkr %mifLFkr %mifLFkr %

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % fo}ku izfrfuf/k Jh tqxy fd'kksj vxzokyA

vizkFkhZ cSasd dh vksj ls % fo}ku izfrfuf/k Jh #ihu dkyk A

fnukad % 15fnukad % 15fnukad % 15fnukad % 15----11111111----2017201720172017

vfvfvfvf/kfu.kZ;/kfu.kZ;/kfu.kZ;/kfu.kZ;

dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;]ubZfnYYkh ls mijksDr vkns'k ds tfj;s fuEu vuqlwph dk fookn vf/kfu.kZ; gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks fnuakd 29- 7-98 dks izkIRk gqvk gSA

"Whether the action of the Managment of Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.,Jaipur is justified in terminating the

services of Sh.Anadi Kaushik[Workman] w.e.f.19-7-95[AN,without paying him notice pay and retrenchment

compensation in violatrion of section 25-F of I.D.Act,1947 ? If not,what relief to the workmen is entitled to ? "

izdj.k ntZ jftLVj fd;k tkdj mHk; i{kdkjku dks uksfVl tkjh fd, x,A izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd dh vksj ls fnuakd 26-8-98 dks LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse is'k dj vfHkdFku fd;k x;k fd deZpkjh dh vizkFkhZ cSad dh m|ksx Hkou 'kk[kk esa izkjfEHkd fu;qfDr fnuakd 22 vxLr 1994 esa iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa dh xbZ Fkh rFkk fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds izkFkhZ Jfed fofHkUu inksa ij 19 tqykbZ 1995 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djrk jgk rFkk vpkud fnuakd 19-7-95 dks vizkFkhZ cSad ds vf/kdkfj;ksa dks bl ckr dk /;ku vk;k fd izkFkhZ djhc ,d o"kZ dk;Z dj pqdk gS rFkk ,d o"kZ esa Hkh 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z dj pqdk gS rFkk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZ cSad ls LFkk;h #i ls dk;Z djus dk dkuwuh vf/kdkj izkIr gks x;k rFkk yxkrkj cus jgus dk Hkh vf/kdkj izkIr gks x;k rFkk bl ,d o"kZ dh vof/k dks de djus ds fy, vizkFkhZ cSad us izkFkhZ dh ekg uoacj o fnlacj 1994 dh mifLFkfr dkVus dh dksf'k'k dh rFkk izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 2-3-95 ds ckn mifLFkfr ugha djus dh ijUrq dsoy gkftjh jftLVj esa gktjh yxkus vFkok ugha yxkus ls dksbZ QdZ ugha iMrk gS rFkk vizkFkhZ cSad ds eSustj us ;g fy[kdj nsus dk ncko Mkyk fd izkFkhZ ;g fy[kdj ns nsos fd izkFkhZ mDr vof/k eas dk;Z djus dk dksbZ dke dk nkok ugha djsxk vkSj ,slk ugha djus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 20-7-95 ls M;wVh ij ugha vkus ds vkns'k ns fn;s x;s rFkk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dh lsok,sa fnuakd 20-7-95 ls lekIr dj nh x;hA izkFkhZ us viuh izFke fu;qfDr fnuakd 22 vxLr 1994 ls ysdj fnuakd 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj fcuk fdlh O;o/kku ds viuh lsok,sa vizkFkhZ dks vfiZr dh gSa rFkk vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dh lsok,sa lekIr djus ls iwoZ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds lHkh izko/kkuksa dks rkd esa aj[k fn;k rFkk u rks dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph cukbZ vkSj uk gh dksbZ uksfVl vFkok uksfVl ds ,sot esa uksfVl ds osru dk gh Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks fd;k x;k rFkk ubZ HkrhZ djus ls iwoZ dksbZ lwpuk Hkh izkFkhZ dks ugha nh xbZ] tks fd dkuwuh #i ls vfuok;Z FkhA bl izdkj vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr djuk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25 ,Q/kkjk&25 ,Q/kkjk&25 ,Q/kkjk&25 ,Q----

thththth---- ,p,p,p,p---- ,oa ,u,oa ,u,oa ,u,oa ,u---- ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gS] tcfd budh ikyuk djuk eSUMsVjh gSA vr% izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr dks vuqfpr o voS/k fo'ks"kdj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947 dh /kkjk&25 ,Q-th-,p- ,oa ,u- ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr rFkk bl ,DV ds vUrxZr cus fu;e 77 o 78 ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr ?kksf"kr fd;k tkus rFkk izkFkhZ dks fiNys leLr osru o lsok ykHkksa ds lkFk foi{kh laLFkku esa iqu% cgkyh dk ?kksf"kr fd;k tkus rFkk izkFkhZ dks fiNys osru o lsokykHkksa ij C;kt o okn dk [kpZ Hkh fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gS lkFk gh {kfriwfrZ ds #i esa eqvkotk Hkh fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA

foi{kh cSad dh vksj ls izkFkhZ ;wfu;u ds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dk tokc izLrqr dj vfHkdFku fd;k gS fd cSad vkWQ jktLFkku }kjk ,d uhfrxr fu.kZ; bl izdkj dk fy;k x;k Fkk fd ,sls fo|kFkhZ tks fd v/;;ujr gSa vkSj tks v/;;ujr jgrs gq, LokoyECkh cuuk pkgrs gSa] mUgsa cSad esa xzkgdksa dks iklcqd fy[kus gsrq ,ssxst fd;k tkos rFkk ,d fo|kFkhZ ek= nks ?kaVs ds fy, ikVZ VkbZe vlkbZuesaV ij j[ks x;s Fks vkSj mUgsa fyfidh; oxZ dh xzsM dk 1@3 jsequjs'ku ds rkSj ij Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk rFkk ,sls fo|kFkhZ cSad ds dHkh deZpkjh fu;ksftr ugha fd, x, Fks vkSj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk&2,l- ds rgr ,sls fo|kFkhZ deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrs gSaAizkFkhZ vukfn dkSf'kd dks Hkh3966 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] va'akdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us dqy 179 fnu ls vf/kd foi{kh cSad esa va'kdkyhu iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls dke ugha fd;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dks izFke ckj fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-8-94 rd o fQj fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dh vof/k esa iklcqd jkbZVj dk dke fn;k x;k Fkk vkSj bl rjg mDr vof/k lekIr gks tkus ds ckn izkFkhZ dk foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z Lor% lekIr gks x;k rFkk izkFkhZ dks dHkh fdlh fu;e ;k izfdz;k dks viuk;k tkdj fu;fer #i ls fu;qfDr foi{kh cSad esa iznku ugha dh xbZ Fkh vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa og deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS rFkk ,slh esa tks fookn mBk;k x;k gS og vkS|ksfxd fookn dh rkjhQ eas ugha ekuk tk ldrk bl izdkj izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr Dyse ljljhrkSj ij gh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gksuk vfHkdFku djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd pwafd izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2,l-ds rgr deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha vkrk gS] blfy, ml ij vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gSa]blfy, mldk ;g Dyse pyus ;ksX; ugha gS vkSj ;fn izkFkhZ ij vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw gksuk ekuk Hkh tkrk gS rks Hkh mldk ekeyk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2 vks vks ¼chch½ ds rgr vkrk gS vkSj og fdlh izdkj dh jkgr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA vUr esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLRkqr LVsVesV vkWQ Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSaA

eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

vc U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k vo/kkj.kh; fcUnq ;g gS fd D;k izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd dk foi{kh cSad ls iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ls lsoki;kZolku fnuakd 19-7-95 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-ds izko/kkuksa ds vfrya?ku esa fd;k gS \ ;fn gkW] rks izkFkhZ deZdkj D;k vuqrks"k ikus dk gdnkj gS \

vc bl laca/k esa loZizFke izkFkhZ deZdkj vukfn dkSf'kd dh lk{; dk ifj'khyu djsa rks mlus eq[; ijh{kk esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad esa mldh izFke fu;qfDr ikl cqd jkbZVj ds #i esa fnuakd 22-8-1994 dks dh xbZ Fkh rFkk rHkh ls og yxkrkj vizkFkhZ laLFkku esa fnuakd 19-7-1995 rd mlus dk;Z fd;k rFkk izFke fu;qfDr frfFk 22-8-1994 ls mls lsokeqDr fd;k x;k rc rd mlus 240 fnol ls vf/kd vof/k rd foi{kh laLFkku esa dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk tc og 20-7-95 dks M;wVh ij x;k rks mls M;wVh ij ugha fy;k x;k rFkk mDr vof/k esa mlus iklcqd jkbZVj ds vykok ystj iksfLVax] dEI;wVj vkijsVj dk dk;Z]ch-ih- o vU; yksu dh lIyhesUVjh fy[kus dk rFkk Dyh;fjax dk dk;Z Hkh fd;k Fkk rFkk 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djus ds dkj.k mls foi{kh cSad esa LFkk;h #i ls dk;Z djus dk vf/kdkj izkIRk gks x;k rFkk foi{kh cSad esa 100 ls vf/kd Jfedx.k dk;Zjr gSa rFkk foi{kh us mls fcuk uksfVl fn;s lokeqDr fd;k gSAmldh foi{kh cSad dh frydekxZ 'kk[kk esa mifLFkfr ntZ gS rFkk nLrkost izn'kZ MCY;w-1 ls MCY;w-4 izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA ftjg esa bl xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ ,e-1 ls tks Hkqxrku nsuk mls crk;k gS]og mlus izkIRk fd;k Fkk rFkk izn'kZ ,e-2 ls izn'kZ ,e-12ij mlds gLrk{kj gSaA ftjg esa xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd vusDLpj , mlus feF;k cuk;k gks cfYd mlus fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk;Z fd;k gSA ftjg esa xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd cSad esa iklcqd jkbZVj dk dk;Z fd;k]ml le; og fo|kFkhZ Fkk rFkk jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky; eas v/;;ujr Fkk rFkk mlus QqyVkbZe dk;Z fd;k Fkk A ftjg esa xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds ikl cSad dk fyf[kr esa vkns'k fnuakd 3-3-95 ls 19-7-95 rd dk ugha gS] ysfdu mlus cSad eas izcU/kd dh vuqKk ls dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk mls dksbZ cSad dh Ldhe dk ekyqe ugha gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldh fu;qfDr ds fy, og cSad ds fdlh lySD'ku cksMZ ds lkeus mifLFkr ugha gqvk rFkk ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldk uke jkstxkj dk;kZy; }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k gksA ftjg esa xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd mlus viSDl dEiuh esa fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-11-94 vkSj fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd gh dke fd;k gks ]mlus rks fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj dke fd;k gS rFkk mlus iklcqd jkbZVj ds vykok vU; dk;Z izcU/kd ds ekSf[kd vknks'k ls fd;s Fks rFkk og 10 cts ls 7&8cts rd dk;Z djrk Fkk rFkk xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 2-3-95 ls og cSad dk dk;Z NksM pqdk gks rFkk mlds ckn dke djus ugha vk;k gks rFkk xokg us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 20-7-95 ls lsokeqDr djus ds ckjs esa dksbZ fyf[kr vkns'k ugha fn;k Fkk ekSf[kd vkns'k fn;k FkkA xokg us ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds 'kiFki= ds iSjk ua-5 esa tks mlls twfu;j O;fDr;ksa o u;s Jfedksa dh HkrhZ djus dk tks mYys[k fd;k gS mldh tkudkjh mls ugha gSA vuSDLpj&,-1mlds }kjk cuk;k gqvk gSA

vizkFkhZ lk{kh&1 ujsUnz dqekj tSu us viuh lk{; esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad us ,d uhfrxr fu.kZ; bl izdkj fy;k Fkk tks fo|kFkhZ v/;;ujr jgrs gq, vkfFkZd lg;ksx gsrq ikVZ VkbZe dk;Z djuk pkgrs gSa]mUgsa cSad ds xzkgdksa dh iklcqd fy[kus gsrq vuqcfU/kr fd;k tkos],sls fo|kFkhZ ek= nks ?kaVs ds fy, ikVZVkbZe vlkbuesaV ij j[kss tkrs Fks vkSj mUgsa fyfidh; oxZ dk 1@3 jseujsjku ds rkSj ij Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk FkkA3967 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940 bl izdkj vuqcaf/kr fd, x, ,sls O;fDr vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk eas ugha vkrs rFkk izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd izn'kZ ,e-2 ds vk/kkj ij va'kdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i eas fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk]ftlus dqy feykdj va'kdkyhu rkSj ij iklcqd jkbZVj dh gSfl;r ls 179fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk Jfed us izFke ckj fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 21-11-94 o mlds i'pkr fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr mls fu;qfDr ugh nh xbZ Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ dk fnuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk fu;qfDri= izn'kZ ,e-20 gS rFkk fnuakd 20-7-95 rd foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk rFkk fuakd 6-12-94 ls 2-3-95 rd dk izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku Hkh fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr dh vof/k fnuakd 2-3-95 dks lekIr gks pqdh Fkh rFkk va'kdkyhu deZpkfj;ksa ls lacaf/kr fu;e izn'kZ ,e-13 gSa rFkk izkFkhZ mifLFkfr iaftdk esa Lo;a vius gkFk ls mifLFkfr ntZ djrk Fkk tks izn'kZ ,e-3 ls ,e-6 gS rFkk foi{kh cSad o viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZl ds e/; MkVk ,UVªh lfoZlst vkWu ykbZu djus dk vuqcU/k gqvk Fkk]ftldk i= izn'kZ ,e-14 gS rFkk izkFkhZ us viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZl dh vksj ls ekpZ 1995 esa dk;Z fd;k]ftlds ckmpj izn'kZ ,e-21 ls ,e-24 gSa rFkk izkFkhZ Jfed }kjk foi{kh cSad esa fd;k x;k dk;Z fooj.k izn'kZ ,e-1 gS rFkk izkFkhZ us 240 fnu dk;Z ugha fd;k gS rFkk viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ,stsUlh }kjk izsf"kr i= izn'kZ ,e-1 ls ,e-19 gSa rFkk fnuakd 3-3-95 ls 29-7-95 rd dh vof/k esa dk;Z djus ds fy, izkFkhZ dks dksbZ vkns'k foi{kh cSad }kjk ugha fn;k x;k FkkA ftjg esa bl xokg us bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ ,e-20 mifLFkfr jftLVj ds , ls ch o lh ls Mh Hkkx ckn eas fy[kk gks rFkk bl xokg us ftjg esa bl lq>ko ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ lqcg 10 cts ls lka; 5 cts rd dke djrk gks rFkk fu;qfDr vkns'k VkbZi ls fy[kk tkrk gks rFkk izn'kZ ,e-20 ls igys Hkh vkns'k fn;s gksaxs rFkk blls igys vxLr ls uaocj rd dk vkns'k gS]tks i=koyh esa 'kkfey ugha gS rFkk bl fu;qfDr vkns'k eas ;g ugha fy[kk gqvk gS fd fo|kFkhZ gksus dh otg ls fu;qfDr nh tk jgh gSA ftjg esa bl xokg us crk;k gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj us fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr~ visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst dk dke pyk ftlesa cSad ds dEI;wVj dk dk;Z fd;k Fkk rFkk ikloMZ dsoy cSad deZpkjh dk Mkyk tkrk gS rFkk xokg us ftjg eas ;g crk;k gS fd izn'kZ ,e-21 ls ,e-24 ij vukfn dkSf'kd ds gLrk{kj gSaAa

vizkFkhZ lk{kh 2 jkts'k fla?ky us viuh lk{; eas crk;k gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst uke dk laLFkku mldh ifRu ds uke ls gS rFkk foi{kh cSad ls dksVs'ku Lohd`fr dk i= fnuakd 6-6-95 izn'kZ ,e-18 rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd ds }kjk cSad dk Bsds ds vuqlkj dk;Z lEiknu djus ckcr i= fnuakd 17-7-95 izn'kZ ,e-17]iphZ izn'kZ ,e-25 gS rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd dEI;wVj lh[kus vDVwcj]1994 ls visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst esa vk;k Fkk rFkk vukfn dkSf'kd dks 2000@&#i;s udn fnuakd 19-5-1995 dks o fnuakd 24-6-1995 dks 1500@&#i;s dk pSd fn;k Fkk tks izn'kZ ,e-26 ls ,e-29 gSa rFkk jktLFkku cSad lsok esa Qjojh 95 ls tqykbZ 95 rd vukfn dkSf'kd visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds dk;Z ij Fkk rFkk ftjg esa xokg us crk;k gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj laLFkk ekg ekpZ&vizsy 1999 eas can gks pqdh Fkh rFkk bl laLFkk esa Vªsfuax nsdj izek.ki= fMIYkksek tkjh fd;s tkrs gSa rFkk vko';drk vuqlkj Bsds ij Hkh dk;Z ij Hksts tkrs gSaA ikap O;fDr;ksa dks Bsds ij dk;Z ds fy, Hkstk x;k FkkA ftjg esa bl xokg us Lohdkjk gS fd viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst o vukfn dksf'kd ds e/; fyf[kr esa dksbZ le>kSrk Bsds ds lEcU/k eas ugha gqvk Fkk rFkk izn'kZ ,e-12 ls ,e-14 o ,e-26 ls ,e-29 rd vukfn dkSf'kd ds gLrk{kj ugha gSaA</p> <p>izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us fyf[kr cgl izLrqr djrs gq, cgl dh fd izkFkhZ Jfed vukfn dkSf'kd us foi{kh cSad esa fnukad 22-8-94 ls fnuakd 19-7-95 rd iklcqd jkbZVj dk yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk jktLFkku cSad dk vc vkbZ lh vkbZ lh vkbZ- cSasd esa foy; gks pqdk gS] ftlds fy, jsQjsUl esa rjehe dh vko';drk ugha gS rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol yxkrkj foi{kh cSad esa iw.kZdkfyd Jfed ds rkSj ij dk;Z fd;k gS rFkk foi{kh cSad us fnuakd 20-7-95 ls izkFkhZ deZdkj dks dk;Z ij ysus ls ekSf[kd #i ls euk dj fn;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj dks u rks ,d ekg dk uksfVl osru fn;k vkSj u gh dksbZ eqvkotk gh fn;k rFkk tc izkFkhZ 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol dk;Z dj pqdk Fkk rks foi{kh cSad us /kkjk&25,Q- vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku dh ikyuk Hkh ugha dh rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us o"kZ 2000 esa odkyr dh lun ys yh Fkh ysfdu odkyr ugha dh Fkh blfy, dksbZ ykHkiw.kZ dk;Z ugha djus ls dksbZ vk; Hkh ugha gqbZ gS blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj dks iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij iqu% LFkkfir fd;k tkosa A izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gS%&</p> <h4>[1] State of Punjab Vs. Jagjit Singh- A.I.R.2016 Supreme Court-5176.</h4> <h4>[2] Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam-2008[6] S.L.R.-638.</h4> <h4>[3] Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur 2011 [2] R J T-1195.</h4> <span class="header-text">3968 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <h4>[4] Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.and Others.-[2003] 6 Supreme Court Cases-528.</h4> <h4>[5] Secretary, H. S. E. B. Vs. Suresh-IR-1999 Supreme Court-1160.</h4> <h4>[6] M/s. National Thermal Power Corporation Vs. K. K. Shrivastava and others- 2003[97] FLR-</h4> <h4>1065.</h4> <h4>[7] Anand Kishore Vs. Addl.Civil Judge & Ors.-2007[6]- W. L. C.-648.</h4> <h4>[8] Surendra Mehta Vs. Bapu Lal & Anr.-2008[2] W.L.C. [Raj.] 744.</h4> <h4>[9] Union of India Vs. Bhagawan- 2008-I- L.L.J.-925 [Raj].</h4> <h4>[10] 0.P. Bhandari Vs.Indian Tourism developoment Corpn. Ltd.- AIR. 1987- Supreme Court-111.</h4> <h4>[11] Metropolitan Transport Corpn. Vs. V. Venkatesan -AIR- 2010 Supreme Court-206.</h4> <h4>[12] S. Seshachalam & Ors. ETC. Vs. Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Ors.-2015[1] WLC</h4> <h4>[sc] civil-342.</h4> <h4>[13] Hochtief Gammon Vs.Industrial Tribunal Bhubaneshwar, Orissa and others.-AIR 1964-</h4> <h4>Supreme Court-1746.</h4> <h4>[14] Indian Bank Vs.K.Usha and another-1998 [78] Supreme Court -801.</h4> <h4>[15] Bhagwan Dass Chopra Vs.United Bank of India-1987 [55] FLR-909.</h4> <h4>[16] M/s. P. V. K. Distillery Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Ram-AIR-2009- Supreme Court-2205.</h4> <h4>[17] Management of MCD. Vs.Prem Chand Gupta & Anr.-2000[1]-SLR-81.</h4> <p>blds izfrdkj esa foi{kh ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us cgl dh fd vizkFkhZ cSad esa fo|kfFkZ;ksa dks Lokoyacu cukus ds fy, ,d ;kstuk ds vUrxZr izkFkhZ dks va'kdkyhu iklcqd jkbZVj ds fy, j[kk x;k Fkk] tks fnuakd 22-8-1994 ls 2-3-1995 rd j[kk x;k Fkk vkSj og Hkh viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ va'kdkyhu 2 ?k.Vs dk;Z djrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dh dksbZ fu;kstu p;u gksdj fdlh in ij fu;qfDr ugha gqbZ Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj us 240 fnol dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk] blfy, vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q- ds izko/kku dh ikyuk dh vko';drk ugha Fkh rFkk o"kZ 2000 ls izkFkhZ odkyr ds is'ks esa gS blfy, odkyr ds is'ks okyk O;fDr deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gS rFkk odkyr ds is'ks esa gksus ls izkFkhZ fdlh fof/kor laLFkk }kjk p;fur ugha gksus ls iqufuZ;qfDr dk ;k fdlh eqvkots dk gdnkj ugha gSA vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k us U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gS%&</p> <h4>[1] District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Jaunpur Vs. Labour Court-2012[135]-FLR-581.</h4> <h4>[2] Bhim Sain Vs.Government of NCT of Delhi-2014[142]-FLR- 79.</h4> <h4>[3] Shriram Institute for Industrial Research Vs. Rajesh Kumar Gandhi-2013[136]FLR-12.</h4> <h4>[4] Peter Ramesh Kumar Vs.Executive Director, Marshalls Power and Communication India [p]</h4> <h4>Ltd., Chennai and others.-2007[114] FLR-1167.</h4> <h4>[5] Oshiar Prasad and others Vs. E Smploykers in relation to Management of sudamdih coal</h4> <h4>washery of M/s.Bharat coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad, JHARKHAND-2015[4]SCC-71.</h4> <h4>[6] Indian Sulphacid Industries Ltd. Vs. Labour Court Rohtak- 1992-LLR-462.</h4> <p>eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa mijksDr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;kA</p> <p>vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dks va'kdkfyd iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa visDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dsoy nks ?kaVs dk;Z djrk FkkA bl rdZ ds laca/k esa mHk; i{k dh lk{; ds foospu eas U;k;kf/kdj.k dk fouez er ;g gS fd loZizFke rks izkFkhZ deZdkj us viuh lk{; esa crk;k gS fd foi{kh cSad esa iklcqd jkbZfVax]ystj ukbZfVax o cSad ls lacaf/kr vU; dk;Z izkr% 10 cts ls lka; 5 cts rd djrk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ deZdkj ls bl fcUnq ij ftjg ls dksbZ foijhr ifjfLFkfr Hkh ugha vk;h gS rFkk ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p;&Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam- 2008[6] S.L.R.-638. esa izfrikfnr fl)kar dh jks'kuh esa fd vkS|kssfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZpkjh dh ifjHkk"kk ls va'kdkyhu deZdkj vioftZr ugha gksrk gS]blfy, ;fn vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh ;g nyhy rdZ ds fy, eku Hkh yh tkos rks Hkh va'kdkyhu<span class="header-text">3969</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> deZdkj Hkh vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&2¼,l-½ds rgr deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa vkrk gS] blfy, izkFkhZ Jh vukfn dkSf'kd foi{kh cSad esa deZdkj ugha jgk gks] ,slk ekus tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gSaA</p> <p>vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ dks foi{kh cSad us fnuakd 22-8-94 ls fnuakd 2-3-95 rd iklcqd jkbZVj ds #i esa j[kk Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us dsoy 179 fnol dk;Z fd;k Fkk] blfy, 240 fnu ;k 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z ugha fd;k Fkk] bl nyhy ds lEcU/k esa ;fn mHk; i{k dh lk{; dk foospu djsa] rks izkFkhZ us fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd yxkrkj foi{kh cSasd esa dk;Z djuk viuh lk{;</p> <p>esa crk;k gS rFkk foi{kh dh vksj ls tks mifLFkfr iaftdk izn'kZ ,e-3 ls ,e-6 ,oa izn'kZ ,e-20 izLrqr dh xbZ gSa]buesa izkFkhZ deZdkj dks fnuakd 2-3- 95 ds i'pkr fjyho djuk crk;k x;k gS] tcfd fjyho dk dksbZ fyf[kr esa vkns'k fn;k x;k gks],slk vfHkys[k ij izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk bl lEcU/kesa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls viuh lk{; esa crk;k x;k gS fd mifLFkfr iaftdk iw.kZ #i ls vizkFkhZ cSad us is'k ugha dh gS rFkk bl laca/k esa ;fn vizkFkhZ cSad ds lk{kh ujsUnz dqekj tSu dh lk{; dk ifj'khyu djsa rks bl xokg us viuh izfrijh{kk esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr izkFkhZ deZdkj us viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ekQZr foi{kh cSad esa dEI;wVj ij dk;Z fd;k gS]bldk rkRi;Z ;g gqvk fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dks izkjfEHkd rkSj ij rks foi{kh cSad us iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij dk;Z djus ds fy, fu;qDr fd;k Fkk mlds i'pkr viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst ds ek/;e ls fnuakd 2-3-95 ds i'pkr dk;Z ij izkFkhZ deZdkj foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jgk gS rks foi{kh ds nLrkost izn'kZ ,e-11o ,e-12 esa foi{kh cSad }kjk izkFkhZ deZdkj dks fnuakd 3-5-95 dks osru ds isVs 700@&#i;s vfxze izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gS vkSj ;g Hkh ;g n'kkZrk gS fd izkFkhZ ekg ebZ]1995 esa Hkh foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jgk gS rFkk jkT; ljdkj }kjk tks jsQjsUl fn;k x;k gS vkSj mlesa tks lsok i;kZolu frfFk crkbZ xbZ gS] og Hkh fnuakd 19-7-95 crkbZ xbZ gS] tks foi{kh cSad ds nLrkost ls gh izkFkhZ deZdkj dk fnuakd 19-7-95 rd foi{kh cSad esa dk;Zjr jguk vk;k gS] tks 240 fnol ls vf/kd dh vof/k rd foi{kh cSad esa izkFkhZ dk dk;Zjr jguk vk;k gS] tks foi{kh cSad ds xokg ujsUnz dqekj tSu dh lk{; ls Hkh LFkkfir gS vkSj egt viSDl dEI;wVj lfoZlst dss ekQZr ;fn ckn esa foi{kh cSd us izkFkhZ dks dk;Z ij j[kk gS] rks og tc izkFkhZ izkjfEHkd rkSj ij foi{kh cSad }kjk dk;Zjr jgk gS] rks mlls izkFkhZ dh izkfLFkfr esa rCnhyh gqbZ gks] ,slk ugha ekuk tk ldrk] blfy, izkFkhZ vkSj vizkFkhZ dh lk{;</p> <p>ds mijksDr foospu ds QyLo#i izkFkhZ deZdkj }kjk 240 fnu ls vf/kd fnol dk;Z foi{kh cSad esa iklcqd jkbZVj ds in ij dk;Z djuk LFkkfir gS rFkk ;g fufoZokn fLFkfr gS fd foi{kh cSad us izkFkhZ dks ,d ekg dk uksfVl ;k NaVuh eqvkotk ugha fn;k vkSj blfy, vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-dh ikyuk ugha fd;k tkuk Hkh vfHkys[k ls izdV gSaA</p> <p>vc tgka rd vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj lu~ 2000 ls odkyr ds is'ks esa gSA bl laca/k eas vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls U;k;kf/kdj.k dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa .[1] 2007[114] FLR-1167., [2] 2014[142]-FLR-79., [3] 1992-LLR-462. dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k gSA bu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k A bu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa eas tks ekuuh;</p> <p>U;k;ky; us fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd fof/k lgk;d] fof/k lykgdkj deZdkj dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gS] tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ deZdkj lu~ 2000 esa odkyr ds is'ks esa vk;k gS rFkk lu~ 1994 eas og odkyr ds is'ks esa ugha Fkk] blfy, ;g mijksDr U;kf;d fofu'p; ds ekeys ds rF; gLrxr ekeys ds rF; ls fHkUurk ds dkj.k bl izdj.k eas vkd`"V ugha gksrs gSa rFkk U;kf;d fofu'p;&2015[4]SCC-71dk U;k;kf/kdj.k }kjk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k x;k] bl U;kf;d fofu'p; ds ekeys ds rF; ;g gSa fd deZdkj ds fu;fefrdj.k ,oa ,CtkiZ'ku dk iz'u vUrxzZLr Fkk] tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ deZdkj ds fu;fefrdj.k ;k ,CtkiZ'ku dk dksbZ iz'u vUrxzZLr ugha gS rFkk U;kf;d fofu'p;& 2013[136]FLR-12. ds ekeys ds rF; Hkh gLrxr ekeys ds rF; ls fHkUu gSa] D;ksafd gLRkxr ekeys eas vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&17¼ch-½dk iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gS blfy, gLrxr ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr ,oa izdze dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k ;s U;kf;d fofu'p; Hkh vizkFkhZ dks dksbZ enn ugha igqapkrs gSaA</p> <p>vc tgka rd izkFkhZ deZdkj ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dh voS/k #i ls NaVuh dh xbZ gS] blfy, mls iqu% lsok esa LFkkfir fd;k tkosA bl rdZ ds laca/k eas tks U;kf;d fofu'p; izkFkhZ ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa] mudk lEekuiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;kA vfHkys[k ds ifj'khyu ls ;g Li"V fLFkfr gS fd izkFkhZ deZdkj dk foi{kh cSad esa dksbZ p;fur cksMZ }kjk fof/k vuqlkj p;u ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk iklcqd jkbZVj dk in ,d DydZ dk in gksrk gS rFkk DydZ ds in ds fy, fof/k vuqlkj p;u e.My }kjk fu;qfDr dh tkrh gS rFkk foi{kh cSad ,d yksd midze gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh lsok vof/k Hkh fnuakd 22-8-94 ls 19-7-95 rd jgh gS tks djhc ,d o"kZ dh jgh gS] blfy,<span class="header-text">3970 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> izkFkhZ dks lsok esa iquLZFkkiu djus dh ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa dksbZ vkSfpR;rk izrhr ugha gksrh gS] ysfdu izkFkhZ deZdkj dh NaVuh voS/k :i ls dh xbZ gS] ftlds fy, foi{kh cSad us vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q- ds izko/kku dh ikyuk ugha dh gS] blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd ds dk;Z dh izd`fr dks ns[krs gq, vkSj izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 2000 esa odkyr dh lun~ izkIr gksuk vk;k gS] blfy, bu lHkh igyqvksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ deZdkj dks crkSj {kfriwfrZ nks yk[k #i;s fnyk;k tkuk ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa mfpr izrhr gksrk gSaA</p> <p>vr% mijksDr foospu ds QyLo#i bl jsQjsUl dk mRrj fuEu izdkj fn;k tkuk lehphu gS %&</p> <p>vf/kfu.kZ;vf/kfu.kZ;vf/kfu.kZ;vf/kfu.kZ;</p> <p>vr % izcU/ku] rRdkyhu cSad vkWQ jktLFkku] t;iqj ds }kjk Jh vukfn dkSf'kd deZdkj dks fnuakd 19-7-95 dks ,d ekg dk uksfVl osru o NaVuh eqvkotk fn;s cxSj lsok ls i;Zolku fd;k tkuk fof/k lEer ,oa U;k;ksfpr ugha gS rFkk foi{kh cSad }kjk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&25,Q-ds izko/kku dk vfrya?ku fd;k x;k gS blfy, izkFkhZ deZdkj Jh vukfn dkSf'kd ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa foi{kh cSad ls crkSj {kfriwfrZ nks yk[k #i;s ikus dk gdnkj gS rFkk ftls foi{kh cSad izkFkhZ dks vokMZ dh frfFk ls N% ekg esa lank; djs rFkk ekeys ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr esa i{kdkjku [kpkZ viuk& viuk Lo;a ogu djsxsaA</p> <p>fxjh'k dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 14 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 817.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नागपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 77/2013द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-12012/107/2013-आईआर ;बी-Iद्ध]</p> <p>बी.एस. बिष्ट, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 817.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-12012/107/2013-IR (B-I)]</p> <p>B.S. BISHT, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE SHRI S. S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR</h4> <h4>Case No.CGIT/NGP/77/2013</h4> <h4>Date: 19.01.2018</h4> <p>Party No.1 : The Asstt. General Manager(Admn.) State Bank of India, Region-I, Administrative Office, S.V. Patel Road, Post Box no. 37, Nagpur-440 001.</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>Party No.2 : Shri Sudhir S/o. Balachandra Deshpande B-II, C/o. Anand Dongre, Near Renuka Mandir, Yashodha Nagar, Nagpur-440 016.</p> <span class="header-text">3971</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>(Dated: 19th January, 2018)</h4> <p>In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of State Bank of India and their workman, Shri Sudhir Deshpande, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-12012/107/2013-IR (B-I) dated 22.01.2014, with the following schedule:-</p> <h4>"Whether the action of the Assistant General Manager (Administration) State Bank of India, Region-I Nagpur</h4> <h4>in imposing the penalty of "Dismissal without notice' on Shri Sudhir Balchandra Deshpande, Special</h4> <h4>Assistant, State Bank of India, Deen Dayal Nagar Branch, Nagpur vide their order dated 25.02.2012, is fair</h4> <h4>and legal? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"</h4> <p>2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the workman, Shri Sudhir Deshpande, ('the workman" in short), filed the statement of claim and the management of State Bank of India, ("Party No. 1" in short) filed their written statement.</p> <p>3. Both parties argued on preliminary issue as regard to validity of departmental/domestic enquiry before justification of quantum of punishment as referred in reference order.</p> <p>4. The workman Shri Sudhir Balachandra Deshpande stated in claim petition that charge sheet was issued by management against him and departmental enquiry was conducted against him and he was participated in the departmental enquiry. As per report of Enquiry Officer, both the charges levelled against him were proved and Disciplinary Authority dismissed the delinquent from service of Bank w.e.f. 25.02.2012. The workman has filed appeal before the Appellate Authority but Appellate Authority has also dismissed the appeal. In para 11 and 12 of the claim, the workman stated that he has no dispute on departmental enquiry and he has accepted all charges levelled in the charge sheet against him. The workman further stated that in the interest of justice present sentence may kindly be set aside by substituting the punishment of compulsory retirement from the services of the Bank with superannuation benefits as Bank has not suffered any loss.</p> <p>5. In reply party no.1 submitted that the workman has no allegation against the departmental/domestic enquiry in his written claim petition. Delinquent misappropriated the amount of Bank and refunded the misappropriated amount. The workman participated in the enquiry and the departmental enquiry was conducted by following the principles of natural justice. Charges levelled against delinquent was proved and after giving due opportunity to delinquent. The workman has also filed appeal before the appellate authority as regard to modification of quantum sentence but the same was also dismissed.</p> <p>6. The party no.1 has stated that Tribunal is empowered to judicial review if departmental enquiry is not conducted accordance to procedure established in service rules and no procedure of natural justice was followed by the Enquiry officer. Party no.1 further stated that Tribunal is empowered to interfere only when punishment is shocking disproportionate to the misconducts and proved under section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workman has already filed the appeal against punishment only and he has not ever challenged the validity of departmental enquiry at any stage earlier, hence the workman is estopped to raise the validity of departmental proceeding before the Tribunal.</p> <p>7. As this is a case of dismissal of the workman from services, after holding a departmental enquiry, the validity of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue for consideration and by order dated 22.01.2016, the departmental enquiry conducted against the workman was held to be legal, proper and in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</p> <p>8. On behalf of workman it was argued that the punishment was disproportionate even validity of enquiry was deemed to be correct. He also argued that workman was in acute financial crises at that point of time due to indebtness and mother's illness, who was ultimately treated at Bombay Hospital but died due to heart attack. He also argued that workman still sustained the said plight and survive in life due to two brilliant children and family he had. He also argued that workman voluntarily accepted and admitted all charges levelled against him but he prayed just and reasonable punishments like compulsory retirement from the services of the bank with superannuation benefits in place of dismissal to meet the end of justice.</p> <p>9. On the contrary, on behalf of the management it was argued that all charges against the workman was duly proved and bank imposed punishment of dismissal without notice as per service condition applicable to the workman. He also argued that judicial review had limited scope for the Tribunal and Tribunal did not act as appellate court. He relied on the following case laws:-</p> <p>UPSRTC Vs. Subhas Chandra Sharma 2000SCC (L&S) 349, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. N.B. Narawade [(2005) 3 SCC 134 = (2005) 2 Scale 392], Union of India Vs. Parma Nanda 1989 SCC (L&S) 303, State of<span class="header-text">3972 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> Orissa Vs. Bidyabhushan Mohapatra (AIR 1963 SC 779= 1963 Supp 1SCR 648), Union Bank of India Vs. Vishwa Mohan 1998 (4) SCC 310 = 1998 LIC 2514, SBI Vs. Bela Bagchi 2005 SCC (L&S) 940 and Syed T.A. Vs. Naqshbandi Vs. State of JK 2003 SCC(L&S) 1151= (2003) 9 SCC 592</p> <p>9. Now we see the legal position:- Management's advocate to support his argument put following case laws :--</p> <p>State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs Nemichand, Civil Appeal No. 5861 of 2007, SC dated 01.03.2011, Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Hotilal, Civil Appeal No. 5984 of 2000 dated 11.02.2003, State Bank of India Vs Ramesh Dinkar, Civil Appeal No. 2055 of 2003 dated 11.08.2006, Devendra Kumar Vs State of Uttaranchal, Civil Appeal No. 1155 of 2006 dated 29.07.2013 and Bharat Forge Company Ltd. Vs A.B. Zodge, A.I.R. 1996 SC 1556, in which following legal principles are laid down:-</p> <p>i. It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the material on record.</p> <p>ii. Therefore, courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental enquires, except where such findings are based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see whether a Tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or finding, on the material on record. Courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be arbitrary, capricious, malafide or based on extraneous considerations.</p> <p>iii. When a court is considering whether punishment of 'termination from service' imposed upon a bank employee is shockingly excessive or disproportionate to the gravity of the proved misconduct, the loss of confidence in the employee will be an important and relevant factor.</p> <p>iv. That having regard to the gravity of the established misconduct, the punishing authority had the power and jurisdiction to impose punishment.</p> <p>v. Legal position would establish that the disciplinary authority, and on appeal the appellate authority, being fact-finding authorities have exclusive power to consider the evidence with a view to maintain discipline. They are invested with the discretion to impose appropriate punishment keeping in view the magnitude or gravity of the misconduct.</p> <p>vi The position in our country, in administrative law, where no fundamental freedoms as aforesaid are involved, is that the courts/tribunals will only play a secondary role while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority.</p> <p>vii. Court interfered with the punishment only after coming to the conclusion that the punishment was in outrageous defiance of logic and was shocking.</p> <p>viii. If the charged employee holds a position of trust where honesty and integrity are inbuilt requirements of functioning, it would not be proper to deal with the matter leniently. Misconduct in such cases has to be dealt with iron hands.</p> <p>ix. Misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud, and further held fraudulent misrepresentation is called deceit and consists in lending a man into damage by willfully or recklessly causing him to believe and act on falsehood.</p> <p>x. If the initial action is not in consonance with law, the subsequent conduct of a party cannot sanctify the same.</p> <p>10. Now I will discuss the evidence with reference to the argument of the workman. Workman in statement of claim para no. 11 & 12 admitted the proceeding of departmental enquiry conducted against him by the bank and he also admitted the charges levelled against him. He has nothing to object about the findings given by the enquiry officer. He also admitted that the copy of enquiry report was also received.</p> <p>On this admission management counsel relied on the following case law:-</p> <p>Chairman & Managing Director V.S.P. Vs. Gopal Raju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu (2008) 2 SCC(L&S) 311 and Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Vs. Hukumchand (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 615 in which it was held that – 1) "Held, detailed enquiry need not be held- Penalty based on respondent's admission that he unauthorisedly absented, was valid in view of the Evidence Act, 1872, S.58". 2) "Employee's own admission of misconduct- Enquiry in such an eventuality, held not necessary- Administrative Law – Natural justice".</p> <span class="header-text">3973</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>On the perusal of the record it appears that the departmental enquiry was conducted properly and sufficient opportunity was given to the workman on behalf of the management. In my opinion there was no legal defect in the departmental enquiry.</p> <p>11. As far as quantum of punishment is concerned it is well settled that the disciplinary authority and appellate authority being the fact finding authority. So this Tribunal is not an appellate authority i.e. Tribunal will only play secondary roll while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority. It is also clear from the above case law that jurisdiction of the Tribunal is very limited and its power to interfere with disciplinary matters is also limited. It is also laid down in the case law that Tribunal cannot set aside a well reasoned order only on sympathy or sentiments. It is also laid down that the superior court only in some cases invoke doctrine of proportionality if decision of an employer is found within the legal parameter, the jurisdiction would ordinarily not be invoked when misconduct stand proved.</p> <p>12. In view of the discussion made above and the materials on record, it is found that there is no scope to interfere with the order of the punishment of dismissal from services passed against the workman. Hence, it is ordered:-</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <h4>The action of the Assistant General Manager (Administration) State Bank of India, Region-I Nagpur in</h4> <h4>imposing the penalty of "Dismissal without notice" on Shri Sudhir Balchandra Deshpande, Special Assistant,</h4> <h4>State Bank of India, Deen Dayal Nagar Branch, Nagpur vide their order dated 25.02.2012, is fair and legal. The</h4> <h4>workman is not entitled to any relief.</h4> <p>S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 14 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 818.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पश्चिम रेलवे प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 527/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-41012/141/2002-आईआर ;बी-Iद्ध]</p> <p>बी.एस. बिष्ट, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 14th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 818.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 527/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-41012/141/2002-IR (B-I)]</p> <p>B.S. BISHT, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No- 527/2004</h4> <p>1. The General Manager, Western Railway, Churchgate, Mumbai – 400001 2. The Divisional Mechanical Engineer,</p> <p>Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001 3. The Assistant Mechanical Engineer,</p> <p>Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001 …First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <span class="header-text">3974 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>Shri Kanti Mana, C/o Shri J.K. Ved, Sinduri Mata Devasthan, S.T. Nagar Road, Godhra (Gujarat) - 389001 …Second Party</p> <pre> For the First Party : Shri H.B. Shah For the Second Party : Shri Hitesh D. Kathrotiya </pre> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41012/141/ 2002–IR(B-I) dated 31.12.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the Assistant Mechanical Engineer (HR), Western Railway, Vatva, in giving</h4> <h4>punishment of removal from service w.e.f. 25.08.2001 to Shri Kanti Mana, DSL Khallasi is justified? If not,</h4> <h4>what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from which date?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 31.12.2002. In response to the notice sent to the parties, the second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 alleging that he was serving in the first party at Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) on the permanent post of Diesel Khallasi in a grade pay of Rs. 740-940/-. He served the first party for 10 years with unblemished career but he was served with a charge-sheet on 25.10.2000 charging for absence from duty from 12.07.2000 to 25.11.2000. A copy of the charge-sheet has been enclosed with the statement of claim. He has further alleged that he was absent from duty for the aforesaid period due to ill health and family circumstances. He also submitted the medical certificate to this effect but he was not sanctioned medical leave and terminated from service on 25.08.2001 which was wrong and illegal. Said termination order is also enclosed with the statement of claim. He submitted an appeal against the termination letter under discipline and appeal rules on 19.11.2001, the said appeal was also rejected. The rejection letter is also enclosed with the statement of claim. Thereafter, he moved an appeal before the appellate authority under Rule 25 of Railway Discipline and Appeal Rules on 01.12.2001 enclosed with the statement of claim. The said review application was also rejected. He has further alleged that he was a permanent employee and was entitled for all the benefits of labour laws like accidental and sick leave in the manner like half pay or leave without pay. The first party might have sanctioned his leave as without pay but instead of sanctioning the leave, his services were terminated. Thus he has prayed for quashing the termination order and reinstatement with back wages and consequential benefits.</p> <p>2. The first parties The Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Western Railway, Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad, submitted the joint written statement Ex. 5 submitting that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter on the ground that the second party workman was a railway servant holding a permanent post, therefore, termination of his service can only be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the averments made in the statement of claim are not admitted. He further submitted that under the Railway Establishment Manual, a person who unauthorisedly absent from duty, the major penalty can be imposed. The second party workman was working in Diesel Loco Shed, Vatva, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in a scale of Rs. 2550- 3000/- and remained absent from 12.07.2000 to 24.11.2000, therefore, a charge-sheet was issued as Form No. SF5 as per discipline and local rules. He did not submitted sick certificate of a railway doctor during the period of absence. An enquiry was held on 22.05.2001, 19.06.2001 and 03.07.2001; same was attended by the second party workman. After enquiry, the charge was found to be proved. The enquiry report was served on the second party workman on 03.08.2001. The second party workman did not submit any explanation, therefore, vide order no. AME/VIA-5/NIP No. P/308/00/5/AME/249 dated 25.08.2001; he was removed from the service. The second party workman moved an appeal against the said order which was rejected after giving personal hearing. Thus the prayer made by the second party workman in his statement of claim deserved to be rejected. All the documents mentioned in the written statement are also enclosed.</p> <p>3. The second party workman in support of statement of claim and reference, submitted his affidavit Ex. 17 on 03.02.2017 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim but despite giving number of opportunities to the first party, the first party did not prefer to cross-examine the second party workman on his affidavit Ex. 17. It is noteworthy that before permitting the second party to submit his affidavit Ex. 17, the first party vide order dated 28.09.2011, was asked to submit the documents relating departmental enquiry but despite giving dozens of opportunities, the first party did not submit the record of discretionary proceedings.</p> <span class="header-text">3975</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>4. The second party has submitted the documents like charge-sheet, punishment order, memorandum of appeal, rejection order of appeal, memorandum of review on his appeal order, medical certificate of a private doctor and fitness certificate of the railway doctor.</p> <p>5. As the first party failed to submit the documents of departmental enquiry, therefore, the reference was proceeded ex-parte against the first party as none has been responding and appearing from the first party to explain the reasons of prosecuting the case.</p> <p>6. Therefore, the second party workman submitted the affidavit Ex. 17 in support of his statement of claim which is unrebutted.</p> <p>7. The argument in the written statement that the tribunal has no jurisdiction, is not tenable because the second party workman was a workman within the definition of Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Dispute Act and his termination comes within the jurisdiction of this tribunal under Section 2 (c) of the Industrial Dispute Act. The record reveals that the second party workman submitted a medical certificate issued by a private doctor that he has been ill from 12.07.2001 to 14.11.2001. The first party has not rebutted this allegation as to why he could not be sanctioned medical leaves for the aforesaid period, thus the rejection of appeal and also review of it was unjustified and consequently, the order of termination of his service was unjust and improper.</p> <p>8. Thus the reference deserves to be allowed. The order of termination of his service is set aside and quashed. The first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman Kanti Mana with back wages and all consequential benefits within 60 days from the publication of this award.</p> <p>9. The award is passed accordingly.</p> <p>P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 819.—केन्द्र सरकार, राजभाषा ;संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोगद्ध नियम, 1976 ;यथासंशोध्ति, 1987द्ध के नियम 10 के उप-नियम ;4द्ध के अनुसरण में, श्रम और रोजगार मंत्राालय के प्रशासकीय नियंत्राणाध्ीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतद्‌द्वारा अध्सिूचित करती हैः</p> <p>01. उप-क्षेत्राीय कार्यालय, तिरुवनंतपुरम</p> <p>02. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम, शाखा कार्यालय, रांची</p> <p>03. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम, शाखा कार्यालय, रामगढ़</p> <p>04. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम, शाखा अस्पताल, ओखला</p> <p>05. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम, शाखा कार्यालय, मोरी गेट</p> <p>06. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम, शाखा कार्यालय, किशनगंज</p> <p>07. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम अस्पताल, भिवाड़ी</p> <p>[सं. ई-11016/1/2017-रा.भा.नी.]</p> <p>देवेन्द्र सह, आर्थिक सलाहकार</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 819.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :</p> <p>01. Sub-Regional office, Thiruvananthapuram</p> <p>02. ESIC, Branch Office, Ranchi</p> <p>03. ESIC, Branch Office, Ramgarh</p> <p>04. ESIC Hospital, Okhla</p> <p>05. ESIC, Branch Office, Mori Gate</p> <p>06. ESIC, Branch Office, Kishanganj</p> <p>07. ESIC Hospital, Bhiwadi</p> <p>[No. E-11016/1/2017-RBN)]</p> <p>DEVENDER SINGH, Economic Adviser<span class="header-text">3976 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 820.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स ईस्टर्न कोलपफील्ड लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, आसनसोल के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 14/2009द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/135/2008-आईआर ;सी.एम- IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 820.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/135/2008-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>ASANSOL</h4> <p>PRESENT: Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>REFERENCE NO. 14 OF 2009</h4> <p>PARTIES : The management of Dhemomain Group of M/s. ECL</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>Shri Ranjit Roy</p> <h4>REPRESENTATIVES :</h4> <p>For the Management : Shri P. K. Goswami, Learned Advocate</p> <p>For the Union (Workman) : Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative</p> <p>INDUSTRY : COAL</p> <p>STATE : WEST BENGAL</p> <h4>Dated : 19.04.2018</h4> <h4>A W A R D</h4> <p>In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/ 135/2008–IR (CM-II) dated 06.03.2009 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>" Whether the action of the management of M/s. ECL in dismissing Shri Ranjit Roy, w.e.f. 17.10..2005 is legal</h4> <h4>and justified? To what relief is the workman entitled?"</h4> <p>————</p> <p>1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/135/2008–IR (CM-II) dated 06.03.2009 of the above said reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 14 of 2009 was registered on 27.03.2009. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.</p> <span class="header-text">3977</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>2. Case called out. Shri P. K. Goswami, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the management of Dhemomain Group of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited and Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned union representative appeared on behalf of the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy.</p> <p>3. Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned union representative of the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy files a petition that the management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has agreed to re-instate the workman, Shri Ranjit Roy, hence he is not interested to proceed with the case further and the case may be closed. He also made an endorsement on the order sheet to that effect. Since the workman does not want to contest the case anymore 'no dispute' exists between the parties and I have no option left but to close the case. As such the case is closed and accordingly a 'No Dispute Award' is hereby passed.</p> <h4>O R D E R</h4> <p>Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.</p> <p>PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 821.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स डबलू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 14/2014द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/121/2013-आईआर ;सी.एम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 821.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/121/2013-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE SHRI J.P.CHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR</h4> <h4>Case No. CGIT/NGP/14/2014-15</h4> <h4>Date: 05.12.2017</h4> <h4>Party No.1(a) : The Sub Area Manager,</h4> <h4>Rajur Sub Area of Wani North Area,</h4> <h4>WCL, Post: Rajur,</h4> <h4>Tehsil: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal,</h4> <h4>Yavatmal (M.S.)</h4> <h4>Party No.1(b) : The General Manager,</h4> <h4>Wani North Area, Western Coalfields Limited,</h4> <h4>Post: Bhalar, Tehsil: Wani,</h4> <h4>Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.),</h4> <h4>Yavatmal.</h4> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>Party No.2 : The President,</p> <h4>Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), Wani North Area,</h4> <h4>Ward No. 1, Tilaknagar, At. Wani,</h4> <h4>Post: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.),</h4> <h4>Yavatmal.</h4> <span class="header-text">3978 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>(Dated: 5th December, 2017)</h4> <p>In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS) for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/121/2013- (IR(CM-II) dated 21.07.2014, with the following schedule:-</p> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Rajur Sub Area of Wani North Area, Western Coalfields Limited</h4> <h4>(WCL), Tehsil. Wani, Distt. Yavatmal(M.S.) of converting Piece Rated Workers to the Time Rated Worker is</h4> <h4>legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?"</h4> <p>2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement, by registered post with acknowledge due.</p> <p>The party No.1 appeared through their advocates on 19.12.2014.</p> <p>In spite of sufficient service of notice on the petitioner, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No statement of claim was also filed on 05.12.2017even after second notice was served for the date of 05.12.2017. Petitioner did not appear even today. So, case is closed for award.</p> <p>.It is well settled that whenever a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove the illegality of the order and it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the party fails to appear or file written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in favour of the said party and the party would not be entitled to any relief.</p> <p>Judging the present case with the touch stone of the settled principles as mentioned above, it is found that the petitioner has neither appeared nor filed any statement of claim and as such, he is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is ordered:-</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <h4>The reference is answered in the negative and against the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any</h4> <h4>relief.</h4> <p>SHYAM SUNDER GARG, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 822.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स ईस्टर्न कोलपफील्ड लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार</p> <p>औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, आसनसोल के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 24/1993द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/49/1993-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 822.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/49/1993-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer<span class="header-text">3979</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>ASANSOL</h4> <p>PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>REFERENCE NO. 24 OF 1993</h4> <p>PARTIES : The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora</p> <h4>REPRESENTATIVES :</h4> <p>For the management : Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate</p> <p>For the union (Workman) : Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative</p> <p>INDUSTRY: COAL</p> <p>STATE : WEST BENGAL</p> <h4>Dated : 24.04.2018</h4> <h4>A W A R D</h4> <p>In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/ 49/93–IR(C-II) dated 07.06.1993 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>" Whether the action of the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd.,</h4> <h4>in dismissing Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora, Wagon Loader w.e.f. 28.10.1988 from services vide Charge Sheet No.</h4> <h4>AGT/KPH/87/1138 dated 15.07.1987 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? "</h4> <p>________</p> <p>1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/49/93–IR(C-II) dated 07.06.1993 of the above said reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 24 of 1993 was registered on 14.06.1993. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.</p> <p>2. The workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has filed written statement through union representative. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has alleged in her written statement that she was regular employee working as General Mazdoor at Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. She was absent from 11.07.1985. She was charge sheeted on 15.07.1987 after 2 (Two) years. The enquiry has been conducted without observing any procedure laid down in the standing order applicable to the workman. She was not given full opportunity to defend herself. The workman being illiterate are not aware about standing order. Absenteeism in coal industry is general phenomenon. The punishment of dismissal is shocking and excessive. Dismissal of permanent workman from establishment without proper enquiry is illegal and unfair. The workman belongs to Scheduled Cast Community. The workman has prayed that she should be re-instated in service of the company with immediate effect with full back wages from 11.07.1985 till resumption of duty.</p> <p>3. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed written statement. He has alleged that the reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts. The workman was an employee Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The permanent address has been recorded in Form 'B' register. The workman absented herself from 11.07.1985 but when workman failed to resume his duty Charge Sheet dated 15.07.1987 was issued to her for her absence form duty without notice and without leave. Notice was issued on the recorded address with A/D. The concerned workman did not submit any reply to the aforesaid Charge Sheet. The worker was avoiding to submit her reply. The management decided to hold departmental enquiry and appointed Shri R. Sinha, Senior Personnel<span class="header-text">3980 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> Officer. The Enquiry Officer sent notice of enquiry on registered postal address to workman but the workman did not appear. The Enquiry Officer for giving opportunity to the workman adjourned the enquiry proceeding for 3 (Three) successive dates and again sent registered notice but the concerned workman did not appear in the enquiry proceeding. The Enquiry Officer had no other alternative, proceeded ex-parte enquiry. The concerned workman has been guilty of the charge of misconduct as defined under the standing order. The competent authority accepted the Enquiry Report and was pleased to dismiss the workman on 28.10.1988. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed that the workman is not entitled to any relief.</p> <p>4. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed rejoinder written statement.</p> <p>He has denied all the allegation of the workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora.</p> <p>5. Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :</p> <p>(i) Photocopy of the Charge Sheet, (ii) Photocopy of the Enquiry Proceeding, (iii) Photocopy of the statement of witnesses, (iv) Photocopy of the Postal Receipts, and (v) Photocopy of the Enquiry Report. Workman has examined Shri S. K. Pandey, union representative as WW-1 but he has not been cross-examined by the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed the copy of death certificate of Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora and examined the witness of Shri Gopal Gope.</p> <p>6. The learned advocate of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed Death Certificate of Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora on 17.07.2017, copy has been given to Shri S. K. Pandey, learned union representative. But he has not filed any objection to this Death Certificate. Though ample opportunity has been provided to the union representative. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has expired on 04.05.1997 though information has been submitted to the tribunal so late.</p> <p>7. Since, the workman Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora has expired the reference is abated. Smt. Ch. Kajali Kora (deceased) is not entitled to any relief.</p> <h4>O R D E R</h4> <p>Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.</p> <p>PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 823.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स ईस्टर्न कोलपफील्ड लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार</p> <p>औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, आसनसोल के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 25/1993द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/47/1993-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 823.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/1993) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Asansol, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s E.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/47/1993-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>ASANSOL</h4> <p>PRESENT : Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>REFERENCE NO. 25 OF 1993</h4> <span class="header-text">3981</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>PARTIES : The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. ECL</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>Shri Hopna Majhi</p> <h4>REPRESENTATIVES :</h4> <p>For the management : Shri P. K. Das, Learned Advocate</p> <p>For the union (Workman) : Shri S. K. Pandey, Learned Union Representative</p> <p>INDUSTRY: COAL STATE : WEST BENGAL</p> <p>Dated : 25.04.2018</p> <h4>A W A R D</h4> <p>In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter NO. L-22012/ 47/93–IR(CM-II) dated 07.06.1993 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>" Whether the action of the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd., in</h4> <h4>dismissing Shri Hopna Majhi, M. C. Loader w.e.f. 28.10.1988 from services vide Charge Sheet No.</h4> <h4>AGT/KPH/87/1102 dated 11.07.1987 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? "</h4> <p>________</p> <p>1. Having received the Order NO. L-22012/47/93–IR(CM-II) dated 07.06.1993 of the above said reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference Case No. 25 of 1993 was registered on 14.06.1993. Accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the court, on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Both the parties appeared in the Tribunal, through their representative.</p> <p>2. The workman Shri Hopna Majhi has filed written statement through union representative. Shri Hopna Majhi has alleged in his written statement that he was regular employee working as General Mazdoor at Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. He was absent from 19.06.1982. He was charge sheeted on 11.07.1987 after 5 (Five) years. The enquiry has been conducted without observing any procedure laid down in the standing order applicable to the workman. He was not given full opportunity to defend himself. The workman being illiterate are not aware about standing order. Absenteeism in coal industry is general phenomenon. The punishment of dismissal is shocking and excessive. Dismissal of permanent workman from establishment without proper enquiry is illegal and unfair. The workman belongs to Scheduled Cast Community. The workman has prayed that he should be re-instated in service of the company with immediate effect with full back wages from 19.06.1982 till resumption of duty.</p> <p>3. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed written statement. He has alleged that the reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts. The workman was an employee Ghusick Unit of Kalipahari (R) Colliery under Sripur Area of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The permanent address has been recorded in Form 'B' register. The workman absented himself from 19.06.1982 but when workman failed to resume his duty Charge Sheet dated 11.07.1987 was issued to his for his absence form duty without notice and without leave. Notice was issued on the recorded address with A/D. The concerned workman did not submit any reply to the aforesaid Charge Sheet. The worker was avoiding to submit his reply. The management decided to hold departmental enquiry and appointed Shri R. Sinha, Senior Personnel Officer. The Enquiry Officer sent notice of enquiry on registered postal address to workman but the workman did not appear. The Enquiry Officer for giving opportunity to the workman adjourned the enquiry proceeding for 3 (Three) successive dates and again sent registered notice but the concerned workman did not appear in the enquiry proceeding. The Enquiry Officer had no other alternative, proceeded ex-parte enquiry. The concerned workman has been guilty of the charge of misconduct as defined under the standing order. The competent authority accepted the Enquiry Report and was pleased to dismiss the workman on 28.10.1988. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has prayed that the workman is not entitled to any relief.</p> <span class="header-text">3982 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>4. The Agent of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed rejoinder written statement.</p> <p>He has denied all the allegation of the workman Shri Hopna Majhi.</p> <p>5. Workman has filed the following documentary evidences :</p> <p>(i) Photocopy of the Charge Sheet, (ii) Photocopy of the Enquiry Proceeding, (iii) Photocopy of the statement of witnesses, (iv) Photocopy of the Postal Receipts, and (v) Photocopy of the Enquiry Report. The workman has examined Shri S. K. Pandey, union representative as ww-1 but he has not been cross-examined by the management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited. The management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed the copy of death certificate of Shri Hopna Majhi and examined the witness of Shri Brahmanandan Jha.</p> <p>6. The learned advocate of Kalipahari (R) Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited has filed Death Certificate of Shri Hopna Majhi, copy has been given to Shri S. K. Pandey, learned union representative. But he has not filed any objection to this Death Certificate. Though ample opportunity has been provided to the union representative. Shri Hopna Majhi has expired on 20.04.2002 though information has been submitted to the tribunal so late.</p> <p>7. Since, the workman Shri Hopna Majhi has expired the reference is abated. Shri Hopna Majhi (deceased) is not entitled to any relief.</p> <h4>O R D E R</h4> <p>Let an "Award" be and the same is passed as per above discussion. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.</p> <p>PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 824.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स डबलू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 47/2015द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/110/2015-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 824.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 47/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. W.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/110/2015-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE SHRI SHYAM SUNDER GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>NAGPUR</h4> <h4>Case No.CGIT/NGP/47/2015-16</h4> <h4>Date: 10.01.2018</h4> <h4>Party No.1 : The General Manager,</h4> <h4>Wani North Area, WCL,</h4> <h4>Post: Bhalar, Tehsil: Wani,</h4> <h4>Distt. Yavatmal (M.S.) – 445304.</h4> <h4>Versus</h4> <span class="header-text">3983</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <h4>Party No.2 : The Working President,</h4> <h4>Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS),</h4> <h4>Ward No. 1, Tilaknagar, Wani,</h4> <h4>Tehsil: Wani, Distt. Yavatmal,</h4> <h4>Yavatmal (M.S.) 445304</h4> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>(Dated: 10th January, 2018)</h4> <p>In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/110/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 20.01.2016, with the following schedule:-</p> <h4>"Whether the demands raised by Shri Sukhranjan Nikunj Biswas, applicant for correction in date of birth on</h4> <h4>the bass of School Certificate or sending his case to Medical Board for determination of his age and the</h4> <h4>demands supported by the Working President, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS), at Wani, Yavatmal is just, fair &</h4> <h4>legal? If yes, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"?"</h4> <p>2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement, by registered post with acknowledge due. On 16.03.2016, advocate for the workman and management, both were present and filed vakalatnama but petitioner did not file statement of claim. Even fresh notice was issued fixing the case on 06.12.2017, but nobody was present on behalf of the workman even the workman was not present nor he filed statement of claim. Thereafter case was adjourned to 10.101.2018 but today also, nobody was present nor filed statement of claim on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that, workman is not interested to continue this case.</p> <p>It is well settled that whenever a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove the illegality of the order and it is imperative for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out grounds on which the order is challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the party fails to appear or file written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the Government cannot be answered in favour of the said party and the party would not be entitled to any relief.</p> <p>Judging the present case with the touch stone of the settled principles as mentioned above, it is found that the petitioner has neither appeared nor filed any statement of claim and as such, he is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is ordered:-</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <h4>The reference is answered in the negative and against the workman. The workman is not entitled to any</h4> <h4>relief.</h4> <p>SHYAM SUNDER GARG, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 825.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स डबलू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक</p> <p>अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 35/2012द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.05.2018 को</p> <p>प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/230/2012-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 825.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. W.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/230/2012-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer<span class="header-text">3984 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOURT COURT, NAGPUR</h4> <h4>Case No.CGIT/NGP/35/2012</h4> <p>Date: 11.01.2018.</p> <p>Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager, Durgapur O/C Mines Sub Area of Chandrapur Area, WCL, Post: Durgapur, Distt. Chandrapur (M.S.).</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>Party No.2 : The General Secretary, RCMC, C/o Shri C.R. Terbhre, Near Ayyappa Mandir, Tukum Ward No. 2, Tukum, Chandrapur, Chandrapur (M.S.)</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>(Dated: 11th January, 2018)</h4> <p>In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union The General Secretary, RCMC for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/230/2012-IR (CM-II) dated 16.01.2013, with the following schedule:-</p> <h4>"Whether the action of Magmt. Of Durgapur Open Cast Mines sub Area of Chandrapur Area of</h4> <h4>Western coalfields Ltd. of dismissal in respect of Shri Pocham Rajam Pairkawar is leal and justified? If not, to</h4> <h4>what relief is the workman entitled to?"</h4> <p>On behalf of the workman, union representative, Mr. Dubey is present.</p> <p>On behalf of the management, Advocate, A.S. Mehadia is present.</p> <p>Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 6232/2014 passed an order dated 24.06.2016 in favour of the management ad Hon'ble High Court quashed this reference. So, this case is not maintainable and parties are directed that, this reference is dismissed as per direction of the Hon'ble High Court.</p> <p>Inform the Ministry for necessary action and file is closed and registered with result in concerned register.</p> <p>S. S. GARG, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 826.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स एम. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 38/2011द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/111/2011-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 826.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s M.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 08.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/111/2011-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer<span class="header-text">3985</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR</h4> <p>PRESENT: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,</p> <p>C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.</p> <h4>INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 38/2011</h4> <h4>L-22012/111/2011 -IR(CM-II), dated 02.08.2011</h4> <h4>Date of Passing Order – 11th April, 2018</h4> <h4>BETWEEN:</h4> <p>1. The Chief General Manager, Bharatpur Area of MCL At-Mahendrapur, Bharatpur Colliery, Angul, Odisha.</p> <p>2. The Chief General Manager,</p> <p>Hingula Area of MCL,</p> <p>At-Mahendrapur, Bharatpur Colliery, Angul, Odisha</p> <p>…1st Party-Managements.</p> <p>AND</p> <p>The General Secretary,</p> <p>Talcher Coal Mines Employees Union, At-Qr. No. IB-103, PO-South Balanda, Angul, Odisha.</p> <p>…2nd Party-Union.</p> <p>APPEARANCES:</p> <p>None … For the 1st Party-Managements</p> <p>None … For the 2nd Party-Union</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>Authorized representative of the Management is present. No-one appears on behalf of the 2nd party-Union on repeated calls. It is found from the record that despite notice to the 2nd party-Union by Regd. Post it fails to take any step. It is pertinent to mention here that an exparte award passed on 11.12.2014 has been set aside by this tribunal vide its order dated 23.12.2016. After such setting aside the exparte award the 2nd party-Union was noticed to make his appearance and to contest the reference. As no one appears on behalf of the Union and as no evidence is led by the Union in support of the pleadings advanced in the statement of claim, I am inclined to return the reference without its adjudication due to the absence of evidence from the side of the Union.</p> <p>Dictated and corrected by me.</p> <p>B.C. RATH, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 827.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स डबलू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक</p> <p>अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 109/2002द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-22012/196/2000-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र सह, अनुभाग अध्किारी<span class="header-text">3986 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 827.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-22012/196/2000-IR (CM-II)]</p> <p>RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE SHRI S.S GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR</h4> <h4>Case No.CGIT/NGP/109/2002</h4> <p>Date: 27.03.2018.</p> <p>Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager</p> <p>Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast Sub Area of WCL,</p> <p>Post- Lalpeth, Chandrapur (MS).</p> <p>V/s.</p> <p>Party No.2 : The General Secretary,</p> <p>Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS),</p> <p>C/o. C.J. Khandre, Near Mahakali Mandir, Chandrapur (MS)</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute for adjudication between the management of Western Coalfields Limited and the General Secretary, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS) vide letter No.L-22012/196/2000-IR(CM-II) dated 19.10.2010, on the following schedule:-</p> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast of WCL, Post Lalpeth, Distt.</h4> <h4>Chandrapur innot protecting wages of Shri Ramayan Sukhalu and Shri Gouri Shankar Bhaddu, Dumper</h4> <h4>operators, Hindustan Lalpeth Open Cast of WCL is Legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the</h4> <h4>workmen are entitled to?"</h4> <p>2. On receipt of this reference statement of claim and rejoinder filed by the petitioner and written statement filed by the party no.1.</p> <p>On behalf of the petitioner evidence is produced. The statement of Mr. Gauri Shankar, Chandrakant Khandre was recorded on behalf of the petitioner. But on behalf of the party no.1 evidence on affidavit of Mr. K. Raja Prabhakaran was filed. On behalf of petitioner LRs of Gaurishankar and Ramayan Sukalu filed two applications for withdrawal of this reference. Mr Gaurishankar Bhaddu was dead and his LRs are recorded in statement of claim. On this application heard both the parties. On behalf of management no objection was filed. Petitioner Mr. Ramayan Sukalu and LRs of Mr. Gaurishankar Bhaddu was identified by Mr. Rakesh Shinde, Tripman of Chandrapur Area. Now application is accepted and permission of withdrawal is allowed.</p> <p>Hence, it is ordered:-</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <h4>The application for withdrawal of the case is allowed. The case is treated as withdrawn. The</h4> <h4>application filed by the Party No. 2 for withdrawal of the case is made part of the order. The reference is</h4> <h4>answered in the negative and against the petitioner. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief.</h4> <p>S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer<span class="header-text">3987</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 18 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 828.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ओरीटिको लि. एवं अन्य बैंकों के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 01/2006द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-12011/81/2005-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]</p> <p>रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 828.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 01/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s ORITCO Ltd. & other Banks, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-12011/81/2005-IR (B-II)]</p> <p>RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR</h4> <p>PRESENT: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,</p> <p>C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.</p> <p>INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 01/2006 Date of Passing Award – 16th April, 2018</p> <h4>BETWEEN:</h4> <p>1. The Chairman-cum-M.D.,</p> <p>Industrial Development Bank of India, IDBI Tower, WTC Complex, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400 005.</p> <p>2. The Chief Executive, ORITCO Ltd.,</p> <p>A/130, Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa.</p> <p>3(a)The ICICI Ltd., Mumbai.</p> <p>3(b)The CMD, IFCI, New Delhi.</p> <p>3(c)The MD, IPIOL, Bhubaneswar.</p> <p>3(d)The MD, OSICL, Cuttack.</p> <p>3(e)The MD, OSFCL, Cuttack.</p> <p>3(f)The Secretary, Industries Deptt.,</p> <p>Govt. of Orissa, Bhubaneswar.</p> <p>3(g)The CGM, SBI, Bhubaneswar.</p> <p>3(h)The AGM, Bank of India, Mumbai</p> <p>3(i)The CMD, UCO Bank, Kolkatta.</p> <p>3(j)The Chairman, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad.</p> <p>3(k)The Jt. Secretary, Banking Division, M/o. Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi … 1st Party-Managements.</p> <h4>(And)</h4> <p>The General Secretary,</p> <p>ORITCO Staff Association, A/130. Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 007. …2nd Party-Union.</p> <h4>APPEARANCES:</h4> <pre> M/s. K.N. Mishra, Advocate … For the 1st Party-Management No. 1. None. ... For the 1st Party- </pre> <h4>Mgts. No. 2 to 3(a, d, e, f, h, k)</h4> <span class="header-text">3988 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <pre> M/s. S. Mishra, Advocate. ... For the 1st Party- Mgts. No. 3(g) & 3(i) Shri Bipin Kumar Ekka, ... For the 1st Party- Sr. Manager –HR Management No. 3(j). M/s. N.K. Mohanty, Adv. ... For the 1st Party- Management No. 3(b). M/s. B.K. Mohanty, Adv. ... For the 1st Party-Mgt. No. 3(c). Shri Lingaraj Parida, … For the 2nd Party- General Secretary. Union. </pre> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The award arises out of a reference made by the Ministry of Labour, Government of India vide letter No. L-12011/81/2005–IR(B-II), dated 20.12.2005 in exercising its authority conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after referred to as "The Act") as a dispute arose between the ORITCO Staff Association and the management of IDBI and ORITCO Ltd (herein after referred to as "The Compay"). The schedule of reference is as follows:-</p> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and other share</h4> <h4>holders of ORITCO in not paying the statutory dues and service benefits of the employees of the ORITCO who</h4> <h4>have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization represented by the ORITCO Staff</h4> <h4>Association, Bhubaneswar is legal and justified? If not what relief the workmen are entitled to?"</h4> <p>2. Briefly stated the case of the Union as emerges from its statement of claim, is that ORITCO company is a public limited company established in the year 1976 being funded by IDBI and other Banks and financial institutions like Andhra Bank, State Bank of India, UCO Bank, IFCI, ICICI, Bank of India IPICOL, OSIC. The management of company was being looked after by a Board of Directors consisting of 12 members. The IDBI having 51% of share in the said company had five members including the post of Chairman and Managing Director in the said Board of Directors. Nominees of other financial institutions and State Governments were also in the said Board of Directors. The Board of Directors being policy makers are responsible for day to day administration and the management of the company. The company was having 50 employees for managing day to day work. It was engaged to identify Potential Entrepreneurs, prepare project profile and feasibility reports, undertake Techno Economic Feasibility Report, undertake Market Research & Surveys, Industrial Management & Financial consultancy, project supervision and technical assistance, Any type of research, Environmental Impact Studies, and any other training programmes etc. The service rule of the employee of the company was introduced with the approval of the Board of Directors and the workmen employed in the company have formed its union as named above which has been duly registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 and recognized by the Management of the company. The employees of the company have been rendering their job uninterruptedly, continuously and sincerely for last several years and none of them has been ever charge-sheeted for any misconduct and they have served the establishment to its best satisfaction. But, the Management of the company including the management of IDBI and other financial institutions failed to take up the responsibilities of their financial obligations for which the employees of the company did not receive their wages/salaries and other service benefits like medical reimbursement, leave encashment, yearly increment provident fund etc. for certain periods. Hence, the 2nd party-Union had placed its grievances before the Managements of IDBI and other financial institution so as to enable the company to make payment of the statutory dues to its employees. It is the pleading and stand of the 2nd party-Union that the Management of IDBI and other financial institutions having different proportionate shares in the company as well as proportionate representations in the Board of Directors are statutorily duty bound and responsible for making payment of arrear wages and other service benefits to the employees of the company. When the IDBI and other financial institutions paid a deaf ear to the demand of the 2nd party-Union, a dispute was raised before the labour machinery resulting in the present reference.</p> <p>3. The management of IDBI has contested the claim of the Union denying its liability to make payment of arrear wages and service benefits to the employees of the company. In its written statement it has been pleaded that IDBI is a separate legal entity than the company and being a financial institution it had a limited promotional role in the formation of the company. It has no role in the day to day management, affairs, business and operation of the company. Its role was restricted to the act of investor/share holder. In the capacity of share-holder it had nominated some members to the Board. Some other financial institutions having shares in the company have also appointed their nominees as members of the said Board. The role of the nominees was restricted to the discussion in policy matters placed before it by the Management of the company and to take decisions on those matters. The ORITICO company was managed by a team of independent professionals and other supportive staffs having no connections with the<span class="header-text">3989</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> management of IDBI and other financial institutions. There was no "employer and employee" relationship between the staffs of the company and IDBI or other financial institutions. It has no control or supervisory power in the selection and recruitment of Executives and staffs of the company as well as fixation of their wages/salaries and service conditions. There is also no contract between the IDBI and the employees of the company or the Management of the said company so as to fasten the Management of IDBI to make payment of wages and service benefits to the employees. Thus, it has no legal or moral obligation for unpaid salaries and service benefits of the employees except its liability or obligation limited to the extent of unpaid shares, if any. It has, further, taken a stand that having transferred it's shares in favour of SIDBI and withdrawn its nominees from the Board of Directors since long it has no liability or obligation to the demand of the 2nd party-Union. The Management of ORITCO having failed to make its appearance in the reference inspite of sufficiency of notice has been duly set exparte. It is pertinent to mention here that at the instance of the 2nd party-Union other financial institutions i.e. IFCI, IPICOL, State Bank of India, Andhra Bank, UCO Bank have been impleaded in the case. All of them have also contested the claim of the Union filing their separate written statements taking almost similar stand taken by the Management of the IDBI.</p> <p>4. On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues have been settled for a just and proper adjudication of the dispute.</p> <h4>I S S U E S</h4> <p>1. Whether the action of the Management of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) and other share holders of ORITCO in not paying the statutory dues and service benefits of the employees of the ORITCO who have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization represented by the ORITCO Staff Association, Bhubaneswar is legal and justified?</p> <p>2. Whether the reference is bad for non-joinder and mis-joinder of parties?</p> <p>3. Whether the 2nd party Union has any locustandi to put forth any claim against the 1st Party-Managements?</p> <p>4. If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?</p> <p>5. The 2nd party-Union has examined three witness namely Shri Bhikiari Charan Tripathy, Shri Kartik Charan Dehury, and Shri Lingaraj Parida, who are stated to be the staff of the company and filed copy of the Memorandum of Articles of Association, copies of the letters from IDBI to ORITCO issued on different dates, copy of the ORITCO Staff Rules, copy of the letter from ORITCO for reorganization to ORITCO Staff Association on dated 4.8.1983, copies of the appointment orders of workmen, copies of three agreements between the ORITCO Management and ORITCO Association, copy of the letter of te Union to the Management and other share holders on different dates, copy of the Award passed in I.D. Case No. 8/2000 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, copy of the order passed in Misc. Case No. 428/95, copy of the written statement filed in I.D. Case No. 8/2000, copy of the proceeding of the meeting presided by the Government in Industries Deptt, copies of the revital plant of ORITCO and letters to IDBI and other share holders, copy of the letter of IDBI for transfer of share to SIDBI on 31.7.2009 & 25.11.2009, copy of the list of ORITCO Board of Directors invited to last board meeting on 27.08.2002 which are marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-15 in support of the pleadings advanced in the statement of claim. Per contra, the Managements of IDBI, State Bank of India, UCO Bank, Andhra Bank, IPICOL and have examined one witness each to refute the allegations raised in the claim statement of the Union.</p> <p>6. Since the issues are inter-linked to each other they are taken into consideration simultaneously for the sake of convenience.</p> <p>It is apparent from the pleadings and evidence of the parties that the company of ORITCO has separate legal entity than the Management of IDBI and other financial institutions who are stated to be the share-holders of the company. There is no serious dispute that the ORITCO is a public limited company and an Undertakings of the Government of Odisha. It is also emerging from the evidence of the parties and cross examination of W.Ws that none of the employees of the ORITCO was appointed by any of the share holders including the Management of IDBI. The 1st Party-Managements except the company have neither any supervisory role in the day to day work of the company nor the employees of the company were ever working under the supervision and control of those Management-Banks. W.W-1 has further admitted that the company was filing its return separately before the Registrar of the Companies. He admits that liability of the share-holders with regard to profit and loss of the company is confined only to the dividends. The M.D. of the company was the appointing authority of the disputant workmen. He admits to have worked under the management of the company and not under any share-holders. It is elicited from their cross examination that one of the workmen was retrenched earlier and he was reinstated. Usually suspension/dismissal/retrenchment of the workmen of the company was not made on approval of the share-holders. It is emerging from his cross examination and cross examination of other witnesses that on earlier occasions settlements were reached out between the staff<span class="header-text">3990 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> and the Management of the company with regard to enhancement of wages and other service conditions and on those occasions neither the IDBI nor any financial institutions were a party to such settlements.</p> <p>7. The witnesses examined on behalf of the Financial Institutions have stated in an identical manner that the financial institutions other than the company are no way liable and responsible for non-payment of salaries and other service benefits to the staff of the company as no relationship of employer and employee exists between them and the staff of the company. The employees of the company are covered under the Employees Provident Funds and other provisions under ORITCO and they were receiving their wages and other benefits from the Management of ORITCO. There is no privity of contract in any form between the Management of the company and the Managements of the financial institutions to make the financial institutions legally duty bound to bear the expenditure of the company towards wages of its staff. Any of the financial institutions has any nexus with the administrative affairs of the company or its employees. The role of the institutions was restricted to the role of an investor i.e. share-holder only. Indisputedly, it is emerging from the evidence of these witnesses that none of the financial institutions has any role in the man-power, planning, recruitment, selection, appointment of senior executives and other sub-ordinate staffs including fixation of salary, wages and payment thereof. The ORITCO is neither a subsidiary of the IDBI or any other financial institution. The staff of the company are governed by the rules and circulars introduced by the Management of ORITCO. It has been specifically stated by these witnesses that the employees of the company are not the "workmen" of any of the financial institutions as defined under section 2(s) of the Act. Such oral evidence of the witnesses has not been demolished in any manner and rather, the same is getting support from the pleadings and evidence of the 2nd party-Union. It is seen from the evidence of the witness examined on behalf of the IDBI Management that in the meanwhile the IDBI transferred its share in favour of SIDBI. As per his evidence those shares having been fully paid, the Management of IDBI has no liability towards loss of the company. The documents filed by the 2nd party-Union i.e. Ext.-8 and Ext.-9 clearly reveal that on earlier occasions when there was a dispute regarding enhancement of wages and non-payment of wages, reference and Misc. case were instituted before the State Industrial Tribunal of Govt. of Odisha and the Management of ORITCO was dragged only as a party to those reference and the case. Even, if it is accepted for argument sake that the management of IDBI and other financial institutions had played or acted as a promoter of the company or funded in formation of the company, they cannot be held responsible or liable for all the times for the liability incurred by the company. The Management of ORITCO having a separate legal entity and juristic person can sue and can be sued separately. The Management of all the financial institutions have no role to play either in the day to day administration of the management of the company or in the appointment of its executives and sub-ordinate staffs. The 2nd party-Union has failed to file any document to show that there was any privity of contract by which either the IDBI or any other financial institution impleaded in the reference has a legal liability towards wages and office expenses of the company. The Memorandum of Association of the company does not bear any term and condition by virtue of which the share holders or promoters can be dragged into the court of law to bear the liability of the company towards its office expenses or wages to be paid to its employees. Be that as it may, the Management of the financial institutions including the IDBI cannot be held legally or morally liable to make good of the loss sustained by the management of ORITCO so as to enable it to pay the statutory dues and service benefits to its employees. These financial institutions cannot be compelled or forced to make payment of statutory dues and service benefits of the workmen of the ORITCO. The Management of ORITCO is solely liable and responsible for such non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits. In the facts and circumstances analysed above the Management of ORITCO can be held liable for non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits to its employees who have rendered continuous service for several years to the organization and the Management of IDBI or any other Bank/Financial institution is no way concerned for such non-payment of statutory dues and service benefits.</p> <p>8. It is not out of place to mention here that the management of IDBI and managements of other financial institutions have advanced a pleading that the reference is not maintainable in this forum on account of the dispute is between the management of ORITCO and its employees and the ORITCO being a State Government undertaking, the appropriate government in the matter is the State Government of Odisha and as such any effort towards conciliation was supposed to be taken over by the labour machinery of the Government of Odisha. Admittedly the company is a State Government Undertaking and it has no nexus with the financial institutions for its day to day administration or management. On earlier occasions dispute between the employees and the management of ORITCO was referred to the State Industrial Tribunal. Having regard to the above fact and circumstance doubt can also be entertained on the maintainability of the reference in this Tribunal.</p> <p>The reference is answered accordingly.</p> <p>Dictated & Corrected by me.</p> <p>B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer<span class="header-text">3991</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 18 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 829.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सैन्ट्रल बैंक ऑपफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार</p> <p>औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 16/2009द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को</p> <p>18.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-12011/129/2008-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]</p> <p>रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 829.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-12011/129/2008-IR (B-II)]</p> <p>RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR</h4> <h4>COURT No.2: ROOM No.512, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075</h4> <h4>ID No. 16/2009</h4> <p>The President, Central Bank Workers Union, Link House, 4, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, Press Area, New Delhi – 110 002</p> <p>...Workman</p> <h4>Vs.</h4> <p>The Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India, Link House, 3, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002</p> <p>…Management</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>In this case a reference was received from the Ministry of Labour and Employment vide letter No. L-12011/ 129/2008-(IR(B-II) dated 11.02.2009 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (in short, the Act) this for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under :</p> <h4>'Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Anil</h4> <h4>Kumar with effect from 07.08.2007 is just, fair and legal? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to</h4> <h4>and from which date?'</h4> <p>2. Both parties were put to notice and upon appearance, Shri Anil Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) filed statement of claim with the averments that he had been in the services of Central Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) for the last 20 years and was an Executive member of Central Bank Workers Union . He was served with a charge sheet on 28.10.2006 alleging misappropriation by him for Rs.60,580.00 when he was working as clerk at Sarita Vihar branch. This charge sheet was issued to the claimant in a well planned manner to punish him for his trade union activities. Even prior to issue of the said charge sheet, claimant was issued various memos. Claimant filed reply to the memo as well as charge sheet. However, the same was not considered by the management. It is clear from the records that Shri R.S. Sharma, was appointed as Enquiry Officer , by the bank who has conducted a mock and fake enquiry and enquiry report dated 28.03.2007 was submitted to him to the disciplinary authority whereby claimant has been held guilty of the charges mentioned in the charge sheet. Thereafter, claimant filed an appeal on 20.07.2007 with Deputy General Manager. However, the same was rejected on 10.10.2017 in a mechanical manner without appreciation of the submissions made by the claimant. Even the mercy plea filed by the claimant to the management was also rejected as being not admissible. Claimant challenged validity of the domestic enquiry during the proceedings<span class="header-text">3992 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> before this court by alleging that the same is in violation of principles of natural justice as well as banking norms. Enquiry Officer was also acting under the guidance of the management as is clear from the records.</p> <p>3. It is further alleged that Shri Rajesh Goyal, DW-1 had sent Rs.60,580.00 to the claimant through his servant and he has supported the version of the claimant by stating that the entire fault was that of his servant and not that of the claimant. However, the Enquiry Officer has ignored the defence version of the claimant and has also not been provided copy of Vigilance Officer's report. Finally, the claimant has filed order of dismissal passed against him by the competent authority.</p> <p>4. Management has filed written statement to the claim petition filed by the claimant, wherein specific preliminary objections have been taken. It has been admitted that the claimant was in service of the bank previously for the last 20 years and was also member of Executive Committee of Central Bank Workers Union. There is also reference to the reply filed by the claimant. It is denied that the management had not considered evidence adduced by the claimant. It is further alleged that the claimant is in fact guilty of misconduct and he was placed under suspension on 02.09.2006 and thereafter he was issued charge sheet dated 28.10.2006 as per provisions of Clause 12 (b) of Memorandum of Settlement against the claimant. Claimant has attended most of the enquiry proceedings conducted by the management and he claimant has sought unnecessary adjournments. He was fully aware of the various dates of proceedings of the enquiry. After considering the entire evidence on record, Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the charges to be proved against the claimant and management after considering the same and after due application of mind has passed a reasoned order resulting in dismissal of the claimant.</p> <p>5. Rejoinder to the written statement was filed by the claimant wherein the stand taken in the statement of claim was reiterated.</p> <p>6. Against this factual background, this Tribunal on the basis of pleadings of the parties, has framed the following issues:</p> <p>(i) Whether the departmental enquiry conducted in this case is legal, just and fair and is not in violation of the principles of natural justice? If not, what directions are called for in this case?</p> <p>(ii) As per the reference sent by the Government of India in this case.</p> <p>(iii) Relief.</p> <p>7. Issue No.(i) pertaining to the domestic enquiry was treated as preliminary issue and both parties adduced evidence regarding privity of the enquiry before this Tribunal. This Tribunal vide order dated 08.06.2016 concluded that the domestic enquiry has not been conducted in a fair manner and the same is against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, issue No.1 was decided in favour of the claimant and against the management.</p> <p>8. Thereafter, this Tribunal afforded an opportunity to the management to adduce evidence on the charge of misconduct as mentioned in charge sheet Ex.WW1/1. Management, in order to prove misconduct initially filed affidavit of Shri R.S. Sharma. But, later on, an application was moved on behalf of the management for substitution of the management witness, which application was rejected by this Tribunal on the grounds of delaying tactics being adopted by the management and evidence of the management was closed by the order of the court on 25.04.2017 and the case was listed for workman evidence/arguments. Again, an application was moved on behalf of the management for examining Shri Naveen Kumar, for proving misconduct of the claimant, which application was also rejected by the Tribunal.</p> <p>9. The claimant examined himself and his affidavit is Ex.WW1/B.</p> <p>10. It is pertinent to mention here that the Hon'ble High Court in WP(C) No.5294/2017 titled 'Central Bank of India Vs. Anil Kumar' has afforded an opportunity to the management to examine Shri Naveen Kumar as a witness, subject to cost. It was against this background that Shri Naveen Kumar was examined as MW2 before this Tribunal.</p> <p>11. In the present case, it is clear from perusal of the charge sheet Ex.WW1/1 that the claimant herein was charged on account of misconduct in respect of the following charges:</p> <p>On 20.04.2016, Shri Anil Kumar received cash of Rs.60,580.00 towards payment of fees of four students of DAV Public School, as per details given hereunder:</p> <table style='white-space: pre-wrap;' border="1" class="dataframe"> <tbody> <tr> <td>S. &#10;No.</td> <td>Receipt &#10;No.</td> <td>Name of Student</td> <td>Class &#10;and &#10;Section</td> <td>For the Quarter</td> <td>Amount (Rs.)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>003146</td> <td>Dhruv Goyal</td> <td>IX-A</td> <td>April, May and June'06</td> <td>5440</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2</td> <td>003146</td> <td>Dhruv Goyal</td> <td>IX-A</td> <td>July, Aug. and Sept.06</td> <td>3840</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3</td> <td>003146</td> <td>Dhruv Goyal</td> <td>IX-A</td> <td>Oct., Nov. and Dec.06</td> <td>3840</td> </tr> <tr> <td>4</td> <td>003146</td> <td>Dhruv Goyal</td> <td>IX-A</td> <td>Jan., Feb. and March'07</td> <td>3840</td> </tr> <tr> <td>5</td> <td>002820</td> <td>Pratika Goyal</td> <td>VIII-B</td> <td>April, May and June'06</td> <td>4915</td> </tr> <tr> <td>6</td> <td>002820</td> <td>Pratika Goyal</td> <td>VIII-B</td> <td>July, Aug. and Sept.06</td> <td>3315</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7</td> <td>002820</td> <td>Pratika Goyal</td> <td>VIII-B</td> <td>Oct., Nov. and Dec.06</td> <td>3315</td> </tr> <tr> <td>8</td> <td>002820</td> <td>Pratika Goyal</td> <td>VIII-B</td> <td>Jan., Feb. and March'07</td> <td>3315</td> </tr> <tr> <td>9</td> <td>001870</td> <td>Manika Goyal</td> <td>V-A</td> <td>April, May and June'06</td> <td>4885</td> </tr> <tr> <td>10</td> <td>001870</td> <td>Manika Goyal</td> <td>V-A</td> <td>July, Aug. and Sept.06</td> <td>3285</td> </tr> <tr> <td>11</td> <td>001870</td> <td>Manika Goyal</td> <td>V-A</td> <td>Oct., Nov. and Dec.06</td> <td>3285</td> </tr> <tr> <td>12</td> <td>001870</td> <td>Manika Goyal</td> <td>V-A</td> <td>Jan., Feb. and March'07</td> <td>3285</td> </tr> <tr> <td>13</td> <td>000636</td> <td>Aryam Goyal</td> <td>I-A</td> <td>April, May and June'06</td> <td>4705</td> </tr> <tr> <td>14</td> <td>000636</td> <td>Aryam Goyal</td> <td>I-A</td> <td>July, Aug. and Sept.06</td> <td>3105</td> </tr> <tr> <td>15</td> <td>000636</td> <td>Aryam Goyal</td> <td>I-A</td> <td>Oct., Nov. and Dec.06</td> <td>3105</td> </tr> <tr> <td>16</td> <td>000636</td> <td>Aryam Goyal</td> <td>I-A</td> <td>Jan., Feb. and March'07</td> <td>3105</td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> <td>TOTAL</td> <td>60,580</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <span class="header-text">3993</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>o On 20.04.2006, Shri Anil Kumar was not working at Cash Receipt seat of the branch even then he received cash as mentioned above and issued cash receipts in respect of above mentioned 16 cash deposit receipts.</p> <p>o Cash amount of Rs.60,580.00 was received by Shri Anil Kumar without getting the above mentioned receipts scrolled from the accounts department.</p> <p>o In token of having received the said amount, Shri Anil Kumar issued/released counterfoils, i.e. parent's copies of the receipts under his initials/signatures by putting rubber stamp of cash receipt of branch office Savita Vihar dated 20.04.2006. Amount of Rs.60,580.00 deposited through these receipts was not account for on 20.04.2006 at BO:Savit Vihar. Thus Shri Anil Kumar did not deposit the said amount of Rs. 60,580.00 in current account No.1001323230 of DAV Public School, Shreshta Vihar on 20.04.2006.</p> <p>o On 29.07.2006 DAV School forwarded the photocopies of aforesaid fee receipts to Savita Vihar branch and requested for taking necessary action as the fees deposited through the above mentioned receipts was not credited in the School's account maintained with the branch. On 08.08.2006 entire fees of Rs.60,580.00 plus late fees as applicable in respect of above mentioned students was deposited in the branch through the deposit receipts of the concerned students bearing the same serial number as the serial numbers printed on the counterfoils released by Shri Anil Kukar on 20.04.2006. Thus, Shri Anil Kumar misappropriated funds of Rs.60,580 for 110 days.</p> <p>12. Claimant has also filed reply to the above charge sheet which is Ex.WW1/4 wherein he has denied the allegations contained in the charge sheet. In para 6 and 7 of his reply, he has clearly stated that as far as he recollects, on 20.04.2006, one of his friends, named Shri Rajesh Goyal, whose children are studying in DAV Public School Shreshta Vihar sent his servant to deposit school fees. There was rush at the receipt cash counter so he took the money and School's challan from him and returned the parent's copy after affixing stamp thereon on the slips of challan as the servant told him that Shri Goyal is in a hurry. Shri Goyal was well known to him and he gave duly receipted stamped challan copy to him and looking to his urgency, he asked the servant to wait so that he could count the cash. While he was counting the cash, he found some notes defective and asked the servant to get them changed. The servant came back after some time and informed him that Shri Goyal had already left and his number is not responding, hence the claimant returned the challan copy and money to the servant and asked him to bring proper cash.</p> <p>13. It is pertinent to note here that vide order dated 11.10.2017, learned authorized representatives for the respective parties have stated that they have no objection in case documents which have been exhibited and proved during the course of evidence before this Tribunal while considering validity of domestic enquiry are taken into consideration. It was thereafter that evidence of Shri Naveen Kumar was recorded.</p> <span class="header-text">3994 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>14. It is well settled principle in law that when the domestic enquiry conducted by the management has been held to be unfair or against the principles of natural justice, the evidence so recorded during the course of domestic enquiry would not constitute to be 'fresh evidence' or 'material on record' within the meaning of Section 11-A of the Act. As such, enquiry proceedings have been found to be bad and cannot be taken into consideration so as to prove the charge of misconduct against the delinquent official.</p> <p>15. Now the main question before this Tribunal is as to whether the management has succeeded in proving the misconduct against the claimant herein. In this regard, the only evidence by the management after holding domestic enquiry to be unfair and against the principles of natural justice is that of Shri Naveen Kumar, MW2 and his affidavit is Ex.MW2/A. He has also tendered in evidence documents Ex.MW2/1 to Ex.MW2/11. He has admitted in his statement that letter dated 07.08.2006 as mentioned in para 4 of his affidavit Ex.MW2/A has not been placed on court file. He further admitted that there was no written order with respect to assigning of duties of payment cashier to the claimant. The said order was oral. He has admitted that he was a witness of the management in the domestic enquiry. He has admitted that in his evidence before the Enquiry Officer that payments cashier also takes receipt of cash from customers in exigencies of the bank and to provide better customer service. This witness was specifically asked about receipts Ex.MW1/1 to MW1/4 but he was not in a position to state as to who deposited amounts mentioned in the said receipt. He further stated that he is not aware whether Shri Rajesh Goyal appeared as a witness in the domestic enquiry. However, he has made a vital admission that a letter dated 08.09.2006 was received from the school authorities and this fact is clearly mentioned in the Enquiry Report at page No.70, contents of which are as under:</p> <p>'Reference to your letter dated 11.08.2006 on the above noted subject, I am to inform you that the parents of the students as mentioned in your letter under reference have deposited the entire fees on 08.08.2006 and also given a regret letter to the school authorities regretting the inconvenience to the school/bank.' and the letter has been signed by Prem Lata Garg, Principal.</p> <p>16. Hence, it is apparent that the school authorities have admitted that parents of the students have deposited the entire fees on 08.08.2006 and have also given letter of the school authorities in this behalf that any inconvenience caused to Goyal or the School is regretted and now the school has no complaint against the bank. This letter has been signed by Ms.Prem Lata Garg, Principal of the school. Thus, it is clear from perusal of this letter as well as other evidence on record that the claimant herein has not misappropriated the amount in question in any manner and the entire fees in respect of the students stood deposited on 08.08.2006. Thus, there is no question of any kind of misappropriation or embezzlement of the above amount. Equally vital is the fact that in the charge sheet management has used the expression 'lapses have been committed by the claimant.'</p> <p>17. Since from the evidence on record, it is clear that there is no misappropriation of funds of any kind committed by the claimant, as such, this Tribunal is of the view that the management has failed to prove charge of misconduct against the claimant. Thus, the action of the management in terminating services of the claimant Shri Anil Kumar with effect from 07.08.2007 is unjust, unfair and illegal. Hence, management is directed to reinstate Shri Anil Kumar, the claimant herein in service with all consequential benefits. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let a copy of this Award be sent for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.</p> <p>A.C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer</p> <p>Dated: March 12, 2018</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 18 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 830.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम</p> <p>न्यायालय, जयपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 16/2009द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-12011/112/2008-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]</p> <p>रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 830.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-12011/112/2008-IR (B-II)]</p> <p>RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer<span class="header-text">3995</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR</h4> <h4>PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI</h4> <p>PRESIDING OFFICER</p> <p>I.D. 13/2009</p> <p>Reference No. L-12011/112/2008-IR (B-II) Dated: 10.2.2009</p> <p>General Secretary</p> <p>UCO Bank Employees Association</p> <p>Zonal Office, Imperial Hotel Building,</p> <p>M.I.Road, Jaipur.</p> <p>V/S</p> <p>Dy. General Manager</p> <p>UCO Bank Zonal Office,</p> <p>Arcade International, Civil Lines, Jaipur.</p> <p>For the applicant Union : Sh. R.C.Jain, Representative.</p> <p>For the opposite party : Sh. Ramkumar Sharma, Advocate.</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:-</p> <h4>" Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank through Dy. General Manager, Jaipur in recovering</h4> <h4>the amount of Rs.5581/- on 5.5.1998 from the salary of the employee Shri Girish Chand Sharma, Head</h4> <h4>Cashier from his pay of Jan., to March 1998 on account of lost of key by the employee without providing an</h4> <h4>opportunity of being heard is just and fair? What relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?"</h4> <p>2. The case was called for several times. Learned representative for applicant union is present. None responds for the opposite party.</p> <p>3. After receiving the reference from the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India notices were served on both the parties. In response to the notice to the applicant Union, UCO Bank Employees Association, Jaipur, submitted the statement of claim alleging that the workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma has been working as Head Cashier in the Bais-Godown branch of UCO bank & has also been a member of the Associated Union. Workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma while working as Head Cashier in the aforesaid branch was served with notice dated 29.12.97 which he replied. It has further alleged that the Branch Manager, MandabhimSingh without holding a proper enquiry deducted Rs.5581.30 on 8.5.98 from the salary of the month January, February & March, 1988 of the workman for a charge of the cost of the keys which was illegal & improper as no proper enquiry was held into the matter. The aforesaid union requested the Manager to restore/repaid of the aforesaid amount to the workman but to no result. It has been further alleged that the aforesaid workman was very much present on 13.7.97, 14.7.97 & 17.9.97 but the Manager of the branch debited his leaves for the aforesaid period from his account. It has been further alleged that without any reason the branch manager did not pay salary of the period from 3.11.97 to 6.11.97 without any reason. It has been further alleged that the workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma was to be granted the increments on 1.2.98, 1.2.2001 & 1.2.2004 as stagnation increment but same was not done without showing any reason. It has been further alleged that the branch manager has also deducted Rs.1000/- from the pay of the workman without any reason & conducting any enquiry. It has been further alleged that the branch manager directed the workman to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Dausa on 19.4.1999 which he complied the direction of the branch manager but his travelling allowance bill was rejected by the branch manager. Thus, it has been prayed that all the aforesaid deductions be declared illegal & the workman be directed to be paid Rs.5581.30 in lieu of the<span class="header-text">3996 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> deductions for the cost of the keys. It has further been prayed that workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma be granted first, second & third stagnation increment w.e.f. 1.2.98, 1.2.2001 & 1.2.2004 respectively along with Rs. 1000/- being deducted from the salary of the workman by the branch manager. It has been further prayed that he also be paid his salary of the four days leaves as deducted by the branch manager from the leave account of the workman & four days leaves shown in the account be treated as working days of the workman.</p> <p>4. The opposite party despite service, an acknowledgement of service received & also Mr. Rajkumar Kumawat, Advocate filing his appearance on behalf of the opposite party thrice did not prefer to submit the written statement, therefore, the case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the opposite party on 28.7.2011.</p> <p>5. The applicant union submitted affidavit of workman Sh. Girish Chand Sharma who reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim & the opposite party despite not submitting written statement has also not preferred to cross examine him, thus, the affidavit of the workman is fit to be believed. Thus, the reference is finally disposed off with the observation as under:-</p> <p>"The action of the management of UCO Bank through Dy. General Manager, Jaipur in recovering the amount of Rs.5581/- on 5.5.1998 from the salary of the employees Sh. Girish Chand Sharma, Head Cashier from his salary from January to March, 1998 on account of loss of keys by the employee without providing an opportunity of being heard was unjust & unfair."</p> <p>6. As regards other prayers sought in the statement of claim cannot be entertained because the tribunal has no locus standii or jurisdiction to go beyond the scope of the reference.</p> <p>7. Thus, in the light of the aforesaid observations the opposite party UCO bank is directed to pay Rs.5581/- with 6% composite interest along with Rs.20,000/- as legal expenses to the employee within the sixty days from the publication of the award. The award is passed accordingly.</p> <p>8. Award as above.</p> <p>PRAMOD KUMAR CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 18 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 831.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कोलकत्ता पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक</p> <p>अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, कोलकत्ता के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 22/2008द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18.05.2018 को</p> <p>प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-32011/3/2008-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]</p> <p>रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 18th May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 831.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kolkata Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-32011/3/2008-IR (B-II)]</p> <p>RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA</h4> <h4>Reference No. 22 of 2008</h4> <p>Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Kolkata Port Trust</p> <p>AND Their workmen.</p> <p>Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra …Presiding Officer</p> <p>Appearance: On behalf of the : Mr. G. Mukherjee, Industrial Relations Officer. Management<span class="header-text">3997</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> State: West Bengal. Industry: Port & Dock.</p> <h4>A W A R D</h4> <p>By Order No.L-32011/3/2008-IR(B-II) dated 15.09.2008 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:</p> <h4>"Whether the demand of the Calcutta Port Trust Worker's Union, claiming for promotion of Sri Manoj</h4> <h4>Upadhayay, LDC on selection basis, to the post of Law Assistant in Estate Department of Kolkata Port Trust,</h4> <h4>is justified and legal? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled for?"</h4> <p>2. In response to notice issued by this Tribunal, parties appeared and filed their pleadings. In the statement of claim, the workman's union has stated that Shri Manoj Upadhayay was initially appointed as T.T. Driver under C.T.M. of Kolkata Port Trust on 3rd September, 1991. Subsequently he was appointed as Lower Division Clerk with effect from 3rd July, 2000 and was posted at Mechanical Engineering Department. He was entrusted with the matters relating to court cases. He was also asked to appear before the Estate Officer in various court cases as and when the concerned Assistant Law Manager (Legal) was not available. Thus he was discharging all the duties and responsibilities which were vested with the Law Assistant. The management of Kolkata Port Trust issued a circular for filling of the post of Law Assistant in the Estate Department fixing essential criteria interalia that a candidate having 10 years working experience either as Head Clerk or as Head Clerk and U.D.C. taken together with a degree in law from recognized university and thorough knowledge of the procedure of civil and criminal courts. The circular was issued by the management with a vindictive attitude to deprive the workman from his legitimate claim for the post of Law Assistant as previously one Shri Somnath Dey who was working as a Lower Division Clerk have been promoted as Law Assistant in the year 1988 on the basis of circular dated 8th June, 1987 in which there was no criteria of 10 years experience. The decision of the management for filling up the post of Law Assistant from outsiders particularly from the ex-army men is the vindictive action of the management against the workman. Despite several demands the management did not disclose rules and procedure for promotion of Shri Somnath Dey in the year 1988. Thus, refusal for promotion of the workman to the post of Law assistant in the Estate Department with effect from 5th February, 2004 is not at all justified.</p> <p>3. The management has contested the claim of the union by filing written statement in which it has been interalia pleaded that the post of Law Assistant in the scale of Rs.6170 – 11975 under the Estate Department is in Class-III cadre and is the highest scale of pay available in the said cadre. The post of Law Assistant being a selection grade post, promotion is to be made strictly as per the merit of the eligible candidates and not on the basis of seniority or seniority- cum-suitability. It has further been pleaded that in the year 2002 a post of Law Assistant in the Estate Department fell vacant and it was decided to fill up the vacancy of departmental candidates from amongst the Head Clerk having 10 years of service and LL.B. degree. Accordingly a circular was issued on 10th February, 2003 inviting applications from the eligible candidates of all the departments of Kolkata Dock System. However, no application was received against the said circular. Therefore, it was decided to relax experience criteria from 10 years as Head Clerk to 10 years of service in different cadres from LDC to Head Clerk taken together. This time also, candidates fulfilling the requirements were not available compelling the management to further relax experience criteria. The experience criteria was relaxed to 10 years experience as U.D. Clerk (Selection grade) and Head Clerk taken together with LL.B. degree. This time also no application was received in response to the circular. Therefore, it was decided to approach the Government seeking permission for filling up the post by direct recruitment. On 21st Februry, 2005 when second circular was issued by Estate Department inviting applications from the Head Clerk having LL.B. degree and 10 years experience in clerical grade, the workman Shri Manoj Upadhayay made an application for the said post but as his qualification and experience did not match to the stipulated requirement, his case was not considered. The management has further pleaded that promotion of Shri Somnath Dey for the post of Law Assistant in the year 1988 is distinctly different on facts and circumstances of the case which cannot form basis of promotion of Shri Manoj Upadhayay. The management has denied that vindictive attitude has been taken towards Shri Majoj Upadhayay to deprive him of his claim for the post of Law Assistant and a new procedure for promotion to the post of Law Assistant was adopted. It is also denied that shri Manoj Upadhayay ever discharged duties and responsibilities of a Law Assistant. Finally it is pleaded that demand for promotion of the workman, Shri Manoj Upadhayay to the post of Law Assistant is unjustified and without any merit and consequently he is not entitled to any relief.</p> <span class="header-text">3998 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>4. The union has filed a rejoinder against the written statement of the management reiterating the facts stated in the statement of claim.</p> <p>5. In support of the claim of the workman the union has examined the concerned workman as WW-01 who has also been cross-examined by the management. For the management Smt. Subarna Thakur as MW-01 has filed her affidavit in examination in chief and has appeared for cross-examination by the union. 6. The contention of the union is that the circulars issued by the management on 10th November, 2003, 20th October, 2005 and on 11th August, 2006 prescribing 10 years experience is nothing but vindictive attitude towards the workman as previously the circular dated 8th June, 1987 issued for promotion to the post of Law Assistant and on the basis of which Shri Somnath Dey was promoted does not prescribe any experience. The union has further contended that the workman has been discharging duties and responsibilities of Law Assistant and therefore, he is entitled for promotion to the post.</p> <p>7. Now the question arises whether an employee has a right for promotion? Elaborating this point, Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in Badrinath v. Government of Tamilnadu & Ors, AIR 2000 SC 3243 that every officer has right to be considered for promotion under Article 16 of the Constitution to higher post subject to eligibility provided he is within the zone of consideration and the courts will not interfere with the assessment made by the departmental promotion committee, unless the aggrieved officer establishes that the non-promotion was malafide. Now, in the present case, as per subsequent circulars issued by the management of Kolkata Port Trust, the workman Shri Manoj Uoadhayay was not at all within the zone of consideration. Simply because in circular issued in 1987 the requirement of experience was not there, it cannot be said that subsequent circular was malafide or in any way vindictive towards to the workman.</p> <p>8. It is not the case of the union that the management had no authority to issue circulars dated 10.11.2003 and 11.08.2006 prescribing work experience. There is nothing in Kolkata Port Trust Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotion) Regulations, 1985 which prescribed eligibility for promotion to the post of Law Assistant. It is for the management to decide criteria for eligibility by issuing circulars. The workman is not discriminated from amongst the equals, i.e., it is not the case of the union that in pursuance of subsequent circular somebody was appointed as Law Assistant who had no work experience. 9. The union has relied on letter dated 19th January, 2010 of Kolkata Port Trust to contend that shri Somnath Dey was promoted to the post of Law Assistant on the basis of circular dated 8th June, 1987. The above letter dated 19th January, 2010 is a report submitted by the Land Manager of Estate Department on representation of the workman which mentions promotion of shri Somnath Dey in the year 1988 but at the same time it also mentions that recruitment/promotion was done in contravention of the recruitment rules and the recruitment rules were not followed. It also mentions that the mistakes done by the management cannot be perpetuated. Thus, even though the workman was discriminated, his promotion to the post of Law Assistant has no legal foundation as two wrongs could not make one right. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kastha Niwarak Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Indore Development Authority, AIR 2006 SC 1142 has held that two wrongs do not make one right. The relevant portion of the judgment may be extracted as below for better appreciation:</p> <p>"Two wrongs do not make one right. A party cannot claim that since something wrong has been done in another case, direction should be given for doing another wrong. It would not be setting a wrong right, but would be perpetuating another wrong. In such matters, there is no discrimination involved. The concept of equal treatment on the logic of Article 14 of the Constitution cannot be pressed into service in such cases. What the concept of equal treatment presupposes is existence of similar legal foothold. It does not countenance repetition of wrong action to bring both wrongs at par. Even if hypothetically it is accepted that wrong has been committed in some other case by introducing a concept of negative equality, the appellant cannot strengthen its case. It has to establish its case on some other basis and not by claiming negative equality."</p> <p>Thus on the basis of precedence of Shri Somnath Dey the union cannot claim promotion of the workman to the post of Law Assistant.</p> <p>10. The union can also not claim promotion of workman, Shri Manoj Upadhayay to the post of Law Assistant on the basis of entrustment of duties and responsibilities of law Assistant. A person can be promoted only when he fulfills the requisite qualification for a particular post. Similarly, because a person has been entrusted the work relating to court and legal matters, he does not become entitled to hold the post of Law Assistant.</p> <p>11. In view of the above, I come to the conclusion that the demand of the Kolkata Port Trust Worker's Union claiming promotion of Shri Manoj Upadhayay , LDC on selection basis to the post of Law Assistant in the Estate Department is not at all justified and legal and therefore he is not entitled to any relief.</p> <p>Award is passed accordingly.</p> <p>Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, 11th May, 2018.</p> <span class="header-text">3999</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 832.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, उप निदेशक, यूनानी चिकित्सा, क्षेत्राीय अनुसंधन संस्थान, लखनऊ और अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके</p> <p>कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट</p> <p>;संदर्भ संख्या 18/2005द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-42025/03/2018-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 832.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Misc. No. 18/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Dy. Director, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Lucknow & other and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-42025/03/2008-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW</h4> <h4>PRESENT: Rakesh Kumar, Presiding Officer</h4> <h4>Misc No. 18/2005</h4> <h4>Sri Balram Singh Lodhi S/o Sri Ram Pal</h4> <h4>R/o Village Raniapur, Post Awarawan Distt. Lucknow</h4> <p>Vs</p> <h4>1. Dy. Director,</h4> <h4>Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine</h4> <h4>163-164, Terhi Pulia, Kursi Road</h4> <h4>Sector, C, Jankipuram, Lucknow</h4> <h4>2. The Director</h4> <h4>Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine</h4> <h4>61-65, Industrial Area, Opposite D Block</h4> <h4>Janakpuri, New Delhi</h4> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>The petitioner Sri Balram Singh Lodhi has moved application under section 33 of the I.D. Act, mentioning therein that he alongwith some other workmen had raised the industrial dispute pertaining to their regularization before ALC (C), after failure of the conciliation matter was referred by the Govt. for adjudication which was sent to the Tribunal. It has been alleged in the petition that during the pendency of the proceeding before the ALC( C) the employer has stopped to take work from the applicant w.e.f. 25.7.2000 on the pretext of the shortage of fund, after interference by the ALC (C) the applicant alongwith other workmen were taken back in service, and since then they have been working with some notional break. Proceedings pending under the Minimum Wages Act. as case no. 231-234/2000 have also been mentioned in the petition.</p> <p>2. The workman has alleged that during the pendency of the connected I.D. case, the management has stopped to take work from him w.e.f. 23.01.2004, it amounts to retrenchment the said retrenchment is illegal and void-ab-initio, protection of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, ought to have been given since the petitioner has worked for more than 6 years continuously without any break. Contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act. has also been stressed in the petition. With the aforesaid averments, request has been made to declare the termination of the service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 as illegal and unjustified. Further prayer has been made for his reinstatement with full back wages etc. The petition is supported by an affidavit of the workman.</p> <span class="header-text">4000 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>3. The management has filed objection M-11, with strong denial of the allegations made by the workman. It has been asserted by the opposite party that the ALC ( C ) has no jurisdiction and petitioner is speaking lie, and contrary version has been taken by the workmen, firstly he was claiming stoppage of work from 25.07.2004, some where it is 23.01.2004. The opposite party has further asserted that the application is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.</p> <p>4. Later on reply/rejoinder W-17 has been filed by the workmen with strong denial of the counter allegations leveled in the objection filed by the management, reiterating the pleas taken in the petition filed by him.</p> <p>5. The workman has filed affidavit alongwith annexures. He has been cross examined on behalf of the management.</p> <p>6. The management has filed affidavit of Smt. Rafat Mehmooda M-35, Dr. Idris Ahmed, M-39, Waseem Ahmed, M-51 and Dr. Mohd. Arshad, M-52.</p> <p>7. With the consent of both the parties certified photo copies of cross examination of Dr. M.Arshad and Idris Ahmad have been filed in this case.</p> <p>8. Perusal of the record reveals that the conduct of the management has been very careless and lethargic, and on several occasions matter was taken ex-parte but on the request of the opposite party, the ex-parte order was recalled. However, the cost imposed by the Court was not paid to the workman and the official of the management or the Learned AR of the management refrained themselves to appear and to participate in the proceeding of the case. Again several dates were fixed, so as to give more opportunity to the opposite party to participate in the process of dispensation of justice but the management and its officers have been very negligent, and the officials and the Learned AR abstained themselves for the reasons best known to them. Undoubtedly, proceedings can not be lingered on endlessly or perpetually without any cogent and genuine reason. Under these circumstances the arguments of the Learned AR of the workman were heard at length and record has been scanned thoroughly.</p> <p>9. The main allegations of the workman is that during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02 which has arisen with reference to the Schedule dated 25.06.2002 referred by the Govt. of India to this Tribunal for adjudication, the opposite party has with malafide intention stopped to take work from the petitioner workman w.e.f. 23.01.2004, the so called contradiction in the petition regarding the date of stoppage of work has been duly explained by the workman. The petitioner has elaborated that on intervention made by the ALC ( C ) the workman alongwith other colleagues was taken back in service and later on he was retrenched from 23.01.2004, as a consequence of stoppage of work.</p> <p>10. The management witness Dr. M. Idris in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02 has admitted that he had not perused any record pertaining to the workman/labourer). However, he has given name of 5 persons working in the Herb Garden w.e.f. 2007 to 2015. Other management witness Sri Idris Ahmad in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02) has admitted in para 7 that the concerned petitioners have worked in the department as daily wagers and relevant muster roll should have been there in the concerned department.</p> <p>11. The management has failed to corroborate its version that the petitioner had not worked beyond 12.07.2000. Learned AR for the workman has emphatically asserted that the petitioner has continued to work till 22.01.2004.</p> <p>12. Another material fact has been brought to the notice of the Court. The case no. MW 231 to 234 of 2000, under the Minimum Wages Act. was adjudicated in favour of the workman vide order dated 06.07.2005 wherein the management has directed to ensure the payment of the compensation etc. to the applicants and other workmen in the respective cases. Any evidence by the opposite party to contradict this judgment has not been filed. The management did not produce the muster roll and the attendance register before the Competent Authority.</p> <p>13. After having heard the learned AR for the workman and perusal of the record available before the Court, it is inferred that the alleged termination of service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02, can not be adjudged as legal or justified. Provisions of Section 33 A of the I.D. Act. are mandatory in nature and it has to be followed in letter and spirit. The aforesaid termination is set aside, and petitioner is entited for his reinstatement alongwith full back wages.</p> <span class="header-text">4001</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <h4>The arrear due, shall be paid by the management within 10 weeks,from the date of notification of</h4> <h4>the Award, failing which the petitioner will also be entitled to get interest @ 6% per annum.</h4> <h4>Petition dated 06.04.2005 is disposed accordingly.</h4> <p>14. Award as above</p> <p>RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Lucknow 01.05.2018</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 833.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, उप निदेशक, यूनानी चिकित्सा, क्षेत्राीय अनुसंधन संस्थान, लखनऊ और अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके</p> <p>कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट</p> <p>;संदर्भ संख्या 06/2005द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 09.05.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-42025/03/2018-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 833.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Misc. No. 06/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Dy. Director, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Lucknow & other and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 09.05.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-42025/03/2018-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW</h4> <h4>PRESENT: Rakesh Kumar, Presiding Officer</h4> <h4>Misc No. 6/2005</h4> <h4>Sri Om Prakash Verma</h4> <h4>S/o Sri Chhotey Lal</h4> <h4>R/o Village Quila Mohammadi Nagar</h4> <h4>Post: Bhadurkh, Distt. Lucknow</h4> <p>Vs</p> <h4>1. Dy. Director,</h4> <h4>Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine</h4> <h4>163-164, Terhi Pulia, Kursi Road</h4> <h4>Sector, C, Jankipuram, Lucknow</h4> <h4>2. The Director</h4> <h4>Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine</h4> <h4>61-65, Industrial Area, Opposite D Block</h4> <h4>Janakpuri, New Delhi</h4> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>The petitioner Sri O.P. Verma has moved application under section 33 of the I.D. Act, mentioning therein that he alongwith some other workmen had raised the industrial dispute pertaining to their regularization before ALC ( C ), after failure of the conciliation matter was referred by the Govt. for adjudication which was sent to the Tribunal. It has been alleged in the petition that during the pendency of the proceeding before the ALC( C) the employer has stopped to take work from the applicant w.e.f. 25.7.2000 on the pretext of the shortage of fund, after interference by the ALC ( C ) the applicant alongwith other workmen were taken back in service, and since then they have been working with some notional break. Proceedings pending under the Minimum Wages Act. as case no. 231-234/2000 have also been mentioned in the petition.</p> <span class="header-text">4002 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>2. The workman has alleged that during the pendency of the connected I.D. case, the management has stopped to take work from him w.e.f. 23.01.2004, it amounts to retrenchment the said retrenchment is illegal and void-ab-initio, protection of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, ought to have been given since the petitioner has worked for more than 6 years continuously without any break. Contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act. has also been stressed in the petition. With the aforesaid averments, request has been made to declare the termination of the service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 as illegal and unjustified. Further prayer has been made for his reinstatement with full back wages etc. The petition is supported by an affidavit of the workman.</p> <p>3. The management has filed ;objection M-8, with strong denial of the allegations made by the workman. It has been asserted by the opposite party that the ALC ( C ) has no jurisdiction and petitioner is speaking lie, and contrary version has been taken by the workmen, firstly he was claiming stoppage of work from 25.07.2004, some where it is 23.01.2004. The opposite party has further asserted that the application is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.</p> <p>4. Later on reply/rejoinder W-12 has been filed by the workmen with strong denial of the counter allegations leveled in the objection filed by the management, reiterating the pleas taken in the petition filed by him.</p> <p>5. The workman has filed affidavit alongwith annexures. He has been cross examined on behalf of the management.</p> <p>6. The management has filed affidavit of Smt. Rafat Mehmooda M-25, Dr. Idris Ahmed, M-29, Waseem Ahmed, M-40 and Dr. Mohd. Arshad, M-41.</p> <p>7. With the consent of both the parties certified photo copies of cross examination of Dr. M.Arshad and Idris Ahmad have been filed in this case.</p> <p>8. Perusal of the record reveals that the conduct of the management has been very careless and lethargic, and on several occasions matter was taken ex-parte but on the request of the opposite party, the ex-parte order was recalled. However, the cost imposed by the Court was not paid to the workman and the official of the management or the Learned AR of the management refrained themselves to appear and to participate in the proceeding of the case. Again several dates were fixed, so as to give more opportunity to the opposite party to participate in the process of dispensation of justice but the management and its officers have been very negligent, and the officials and the Learned AR abstained themselves for the reasons best known to them. Undoubtedly, proceedings can not be lingered on endlessly or perpetually without any cogent and genuine reason. Under these circumstances the arguments of the Learned AR of the workman were heard at length and record has been scanned thoroughly.</p> <p>9. The main allegations of the workman is that during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02 which has arisen with reference to the Schedule dated 25.06.2002 referred by the Govt. of India to this Tribunal for adjudication, the opposite party has with malafide intention stopped to take work from the petitioner workman w.e.f. 23.01.2004, the so called contradiction in the petition regarding the date of stoppage of work has been duly explained by the workman. The petitioner has elaborated that on intervention made by the ALC ( C ) the workman alongwith other colleagues was taken back in service and later on he was retrenched from 23.01.2004, as a consequence of stoppage of work.</p> <p>10. The management witness Dr. M.Idris in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02 has admitted that he had not perused any record pertaining to the workman/labourer). However, he has given name of 5 persons working in the Herb Garden w.e.f. 2007 to 2015. Other management witness Sri Idris Ahmad in his cross examination (recorded in I.D. 110/02) has admitted in para 7 that the concerned petitioners have worked in the department as daily wagers and relevant muster roll should have been there in the concerned department.</p> <p>11. The management has failed to corroborate its version that the petitioner had not worked beyond 12.07.2000. Learned AR for the workman has emphatically asserted that the petitioner has continued to work till 22.01.2004.</p> <p>12. Another material fact has been brought to the notice of the Court. The case no. MW 231 to 234 of 2000, under the Minimum Wages Act. was adjudicated in favour of the workman vide order dated 06.07.2005 wherein the management has directed to ensure the payment of the compensation etc. to the applicants and other workmen in the respective cases. Any evidence by the opposite party to contradict this judgment has not been filed. The management did not produce the muster roll and the attendance register before the Competent Authority.</p> <span class="header-text">4003</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>13. After having heard the learned AR for the workman and perusal of the record available before the Court, it is inferred that the alleged termination of service of the applicant w.e.f. 23.01.2004 during the pendency of the connected I.D. 110/02, can not be adjudged as legal or justified. Provisions of Section 33 A of the I.D. Act. are mandatory in nature and it has to be followed in letter and spirit. The aforesaid termination is set aside, and petitioner is entited for his reinstatement alongwith full back wages. The arrear due, shall be paid by the management within 10 weeks, from the date of notification of the Award, failing which the petitioner will also be entitled to get interest @ 6% per annum. Petition dated 06.04.2005 is disposed accordingly.</p> <p>14. Award as above.</p> <p>RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer Lucknow, 01.05.2018</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 834.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, फ्रलैट अध्किारी, कमांडग इन चीपफ, वेस्टर्न नेवल, मुंबई एवं उनके कर्मचारी और अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के</p> <p>बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एचं श्रम न्यायालय, न. II, मुंबई पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या</p> <p>CGIT-2/16 of 2013द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-14011/11/2012-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 834.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT-2/16 of 2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. II, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief, Western Naval, Mumbai and their workmen & Others, which was received by the Central Government on 18.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-14011/11/2012-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI</h4> <h4>PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer</h4> <h4>REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/16 of 2013</h4> <h4>EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF</h4> <h4>COMMANDING IN CHIEF, WESTERN NAVAL COMMAND</h4> <p>The Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief, Western Naval Command, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400 023.</p> <p>AND</p> <p>THEIR WORKMEN. The General Secretary, Indian Naval Emp. Union, 12/14, Rajgir Chambers, R. No. 60, 7th Fl., Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Opp. Old Custom House, Mumbai – 400 023.</p> <h4>APPEARANCES:</h4> <pre> FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. N. J. Gonsalves, Advocate FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. J. H. Sawant, Advocate </pre> <p>Mumbai, dated the 12th March, 2018<span class="header-text">4004 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>1. This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-14011/11/2012 – IR (DU) dated 07.03.2013. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :</p> <p>"Whether the action of the management of the Flat Officer, Commanding in Chief Western Naval Command, Mumbai in denying the promotion to Shri H. G. Gund, Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled Tradesman in the year 2004-05 is legal, just and proper ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"</p> <p>2. After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their respective representatives.</p> <p>3. Second party filed statement of claim Ex.7. According to the second party, the concerned workman was Skilled Tradesman working in the establishment of first party in its Naval Transport Pool. On the basis of seniority as well as suitability he was eligible for consideration and grant of promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman against the vacancy that arose on and from 21.7.04. However, the first party instead of granting him said promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman against the said vacancy, granted promotion to Shri N.C. Panchal, Skilled Tradesman to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman despite of the fact that Shri Panchal was junior in service to the concerned workman and the concerned workman was found fit for the said promotion in the year 1993 itself.</p> <p>4. It is also the contention of the second party that the concerned workman was informed that his claim for promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on or from 21.7.04 was not considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee [DPC] in view of low assessment in accordance with para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT's office Memorandum dt. 28.3.06.</p> <p>5. According to the concerned workman it was obligatory on the part of first party to inform the second party periodically of low marks or any adverse remarks in the ACR in order to give second party an opportunity to make necessary improvement in his work so that he should not be condemned unheard and deprived of the promotion. The first party never informed to the second party of any deficiencies in the work and therefore the adverse remarks noted in his ACR cannot be used against him to deprive him from the promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman. Second party workman is therefore entitled to be promoted and placed in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 with all consequential benefits with retrospective effect. Second party workman is therefore asking to declare that the action of the first party in denying promotion to him in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is illegal, unjust and improper.</p> <p>6. First party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.8 contending therein that the concerned workman was not promoted to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman due to his low merit during the period from 1.4.96 to 31.3.02 due to assessment of individual below the bench mark in ACRs or DPCs for the year 1996-97 to 2002-03, concerned workman Shri H.G. Gund was not considered for promotion to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman.</p> <p>7. It is then contended that para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT order dt. 10.4.89 a person whose assessment is below bench mark of "good" cannot be included in the select list. Shri Panchal was promoted instead of concerned workman whose merit rating was considered undistinguished on that occasion.</p> <p>8. It is then contended that overall grading given in ACR were not communicated because as per existing instructions at the time of promotion of shri Panchal the overall grading recorded in ACR has not to be changed in any way even after the expunction of adverse remark either fully or partially by the competent authority. Hence action of management is in conformity and in accordance with the then in vogue DoPT instructions contained in office memorandum dt. 10.4.89. The first party management thus prayed for rejection of reference.</p> <p>9. Following issues are framed at Ex.9. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:</p> <table style='white-space: pre-wrap;' border="1" class="dataframe"> <tbody> <tr> <td>Sr. No.</td> <td>Issues</td> <td>Findings</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>Whether the action of the management in denying the promotion to the &#10;Workman Shri H.G. Gund, Skilled Tradesman &#10;to Highly Skilled &#10;Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is legal, just and proper ?</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2.</td> <td>What relief the workmen are entitled to ?</td> <td>As per final order</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3.</td> <td>What order ?</td> <td>As per final order</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <span class="header-text">4005</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <h4>Reasons</h4> <h4>Issue No.1.</h4> <p>10. It seems to be admitted position that the second party workman was not promoted to the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on the basis of assessment of individual ACRs for DPC years 1996-97, 97-98, 98-99, 2001-02. It also seems to be admitted position that as per DPC instructions read with DoPT office memorandum No. F22011/5/86- Estt. (D) dated 10.4.89, a person whose assessment is below mark of "good" cannot be included in the select list. It also seems to be an admitted position that on complaint by the concerned workman he was informed that his claim for promotion in the grade of Highly Skilled Tradesman on and from 27.4.04 was not considered by the DPC in view of low assessment in accordance with para 6 of DPC instructions read with DoPT office memorandum dt. 28.3.06. Therefore the question is whether there was any written communication to the concerned workman regarding grading of the concerned workman as average or otherwise as regards to his performance.</p> <p>11. I say so because such communication is necessary in order to have an opportunity to the concerned workman to improve his performance. Even as per office memorandum dt. 28.3.06 it was obligatory on the part of first party to inform the second party periodically of low marks or any adverse remarks in his ACR in order to give the second party workman an opportunity to make necessary improvement in his work so that he should not be condemned unheard and deprived of the promotion to any higher grade.</p> <p>12. For it is explicit from the glaring admission given by Vijendra Singh, the witness of the first party that there was no written communication to the second party workman regarding the grading of the second party as average or otherwise in respect of his performance. He admits that there was no communication to the second party regarding grading given to him in his ACR. If that is so then it can be said that no opportunity was given to the second party before denying promotion to him and denying such promotion without giving any opportunity is like a punishment for misconduct which cannot be imposed without following procedure and also following principles of natural justice.</p> <p>13. Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that if the rating of the concerned was below average then it was incumbent upon the management to communicate that assessment of his work to the concerned workman. Since that was not done then it can be said that no opportunity was given to the concerned workman to submit the representation against the said remark / entries in respect of the marks given. In the context he seeks to rely on the decision in case of Dev Dutt V/S. Union of India & Ors. AIR 2008 (SC 2513) wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has concluded that every entry in ACR of the public servant must be communicated to him within the reasonable period whether it is poor, fair, average, good or very good. The Hon'ble Apex Court has observed in para 17 & 18 of the judgment that,</p> <p>"In our opinion, every entry in the A.C.R. of a public servant must be communicated to him within a reasonable period, whether it is a poor, fair, average, good or very good entry. This is because non- communication of such an entry may adversely affect the employee in two ways : (1) Had the entry been communicated to him he would know about the assessment of his work and conduct by his superiors, which would enable him to improve his work in future (2) He would have an opportunity of making a representation against the entry if he feels it is unjustified, and pray for its upgradation. Hence non-communication of an entry is arbitrary, and it has been held by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (supra) that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution.</p> <p>Thus it is not only when there is a benchmark but in all cases that an entry (whether it is poor, fair, average, good or very food) must be communicated to a public servant, otherwise there is violation of the principle of fairness, which is the soul of natural justice. Even an outstanding entry should be communicated since that would boost the morale of the employee and make him work harder."</p> <p>14. Learned Counsel for the concerned workman has also relied on the decision in case of Sukhdev Singh V/S. Union of India in Civil Appeal No. 5892/2006 wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court while referring to the decision in case of Dev Dutt V/S. Union of India & Ors. has concluded that every entry in ACR of public servant must be communicated to him / her within the reasonable period. The Hon'ble Apex Court thus observed that even in cases there is no bench mark laid down by the authorities for promotion, non-communication of entries in the ACR of the public servant is arbitrary because it deprive the concerned employee on making representation against it and praying for its upgradation. Every entry in the ACR of every employee under the State whether he is civil, judicial, police or other service (except Military) must be communicated to him so as to enable him to make the representation against it because non communication deprive the employee of the opportunity of making representation against it which may affect his chance of being promoted. Hence the non-communication is arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the Constitution.</p> <p>15. In view of this legal position it was necessary for the first party management to communicate the assessment of the concerned workman to him before denying promotion when as a matter of fact he was not considered for<span class="header-text">4006 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> promotion on the ground that assessment of the concerned workman was below bench mark in ACRs for DPC years 1996-97 to 2002-03. It will have to be said therefore that he was not given an opportunity to make representation in respect of assessment of his work. In view of that action of denying promotion to him is illegal.</p> <p>16. In view of that it will be open to the concerned workman to make representation to the first party management for retrospective promotion in view of legal position cited supra. If such representation is made by the concerned workman, the same shall be considered by the first party appropriately in accordance with law. If the upgradation is allowed from 21.7.04, the first party should consider forthwith for his promotion as Highly Skilled Tradesman from 21.7.04 retrospectively. If he is promoted from 21.7.04 then he will be entitled to get the benefit of balance of arrears of pay along with 8% per annum interest and other consequential benefits. Issue No.1 is therefore answered accordingly as indicated against it.</p> <h4>Issue No.2 & 3.</h4> <p>17. In view of my findings to Issue No.1, I find that the concerned workman is entitled to relief to some extent as per final order. Thus the order.</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>1. It is declared that the action of first party in denying promotion to the concerned workman Shri H.G. Gund from Skilled Tradesman to Highly Skilled Tradesman w.e.f. 21.7.04 is unjustified and improper.</p> <p>2. It is open to the concerned workman to make representation to the concerned authorities for retrospective promotion and if such representation is made by him, the same shall be considered by the concerned authorities appropriately in accordance with law.</p> <p>3. If the representation is allowed the concerned workman should be considered forthwith for promotion retrospectively w.e.f. 21.7.04 and if he is promoted, he will get the balance of arrears of pay along with 8% per annum interest and other consequential benefits from 21.7.04.</p> <p>M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer</p> <p>Dated 12.3.2018</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 835.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, अघ्यक्ष-सह-प्रबंध् निदेशक, ई.सी.जी.सी. लिमिटेड, मुंबई एवं उनके कर्मचारी और अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके</p> <p>कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, न. II, मुंबई पंचाट</p> <p>;संदर्भ संख्या CGIT-2/10 of 2012द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-42011/197/2011-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 835.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGIT-2/10 of 2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. II, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, E.C.G.C. Ltd., Mumbai and their workmen & others, which was received by the Central Government on 18.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-42011/197/2011-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI</h4> <p>PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/10 of 2012</h4> <h4>EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF</h4> <h4>E. C. G. C. LTD.</h4> <span class="header-text">4007</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, E. C. G. C. Ltd., Express Towers, 10th Fl., Jamuna Lal Bajaj Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021.</p> <h4>AND</h4> <h4>THEIR WORKMEN.</h4> <p>The General Secretary, Mumbai Port Trust General Workers Union, 1st Floor, Kavarana Building, 26/4, P. D. Mello Road, Wadi Bunder, Mumbai.</p> <h4>APPEARANCES:</h4> <pre> FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. Anees Patel, Adv. i/b. Ambalal & Co. FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. V. Narayanan, Advocate </pre> <p>Mumbai, dated the 9th March, 2018.</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>1. This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-42011/197/2011 – IR (DU) dated 27.02.2012. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :</p> <h4>"Whether the demand of Mumbai Port Trust Workers Union for regularization of the services of Shri Santosh</h4> <h4>B. Surve & 13 other drivers (as per list enclosed) in the establishment of Export Credit Guarantee</h4> <h4>Corporation of India Ltd., Mumbai is legal and justified ? What relief the workman is entitled to ?"</h4> <p>2. After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their respective representatives.</p> <p>3. Second party union filed statement of claim Ex.5. According to the second party union, the concerned workmen are employed as drivers for Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. The activities of the first party company including among other things export oriented company charge free for various services rendered. The company's Board of Directors includes among others Joint Secretary, Ministry of Commerce as Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Joint Director, Ministry of Finance, Executive Director of R.B.I. and many others. The company is also controlled & supervised by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Commerce.</p> <p>4. It is then case of the concerned workmen that they have been working for the company as their direct employees on casual basis without any break in service and with the hope that the company would consider their request for regularization. The workmen themselves and through various other unions made repeated attempts to get their services regularized. The workmen cause was agitated by MbPT General workers union. However, due to non- cooperative attitude of the management no settlement was possible and the matter ended in failure. RLC's office was pleased to send the failure report. The Ministry of Labour thereafter passed an order referring the above matter for adjudication to this tribunal.</p> <p>5. It is thus contention of the concerned workmen that they were working as drivers for senior Executives of the Corporation on full time basis. The vehicles drivers used to drive are owned by the Corporation. The Petrol, maintenance etc. of these vehicles are spent from Corporation fund. When Executive is transferred from one branch to another and other Executive is replaced in that place, the same driver continues to work. These drivers are given proper I-cards by the Corporation. However, the drivers are not paid the salary at par with regular drivers working in the Corporation and other benefits & allowances including PF, gratuity, bonus, washing allowances etc. Even then during entire period of services of the concerned workmen with the Corporation, there is no complaint of their work, conduct, character etc. and no complaint of any sort was ever received by them from the Executives and their family members. They have thus worked for full satisfaction of the Corporation.</p> <p>6. It is then case of the union that due to request for regularization and taking up the matter through RLC, through MbPT workers union, one of the workers Mr. Santosh Baburao Surve, who was working continuously for the Corporation as driver from 30.8.97 would abruptly & arbitrarily terminated on 30.4.11 from service without any reason<span class="header-text">4008 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> and without following any procedure. 7 other workmen were also regularized by the Corporation through back door entry.</p> <p>7. According to the union, there exists regular work. There are many vacancies available for the post of drivers. Many recruitments were made. Many employees were regularized. The concerned workmen performed the same kind of work as the workmen directly employed by the principal employer. In view of that the concerned workmen are also eligible for regularization and to receive regular wages that of the regular drivers engaged by the management.</p> <p>8. It is also the case of the concerned workmen that they are attending the perennial nature of work of the management against the vacant post of drivers for considerable period of time but Corporation refused to regularize these employees and refused to extend the benefits. The union is therefore asking for declaration to the effect that the action of the management in not regularizing or absorbing the services of the concerned workmen with effect from their joining services and discontinuation of service of driver Mr. Santosh Surve from 30.4.11 is illegal and unjustified. They are also asking for giving directions to the management to regularize / absorb them in the capacity of permanent drivers with effect from their joining the services of the management Corporation with all consequential benefits.</p> <p>9. First party management resisted claim by filing written statement Ex.8 contending therein that there is no employer employee relationship between the Corporation and the concerned workmen. In the absence of master servant relationship between the company and the said drivers the question of regularization of the services of the concerned workmen as regular drivers does not arise.</p> <p>10. It is the case of the management that as a part of service conditions the senior Executives and branch Managers are provided with only vehicles for their official as well as personal use. However, no drivers are provided to these senior Executives and branch Managers by the company as they are not entitled for the privilege under prevailing corporate policy. Senior Executives and branch Managers who have been allotted with the official vehicles are eligible to engage the services of the drivers on their own and claim permissible reimbursement subject to limitation stipulated in the company policy. The reimbursement are allotted on written declaration by the concerned officer confirming the amount of actual expenses not exceeding the limits incurred by him on account of engagement of the personal drivers. To engage a personal driver or not is at the sole discretion of the concerned executive. Personal drivers engaged by the senior Executives and branch Managers have no connection whatsoever with the company. There is no contract of service exists expressed or implied between the company and these drivers. The drivers are not working under the supervision & control of the company. The salary, allowances, working hours and other service conditions of the personal drivers are decided by the respective senior Executives and branch Managers and the company has no role to play in these matters. These drivers are not interviewed, recommended or appointed by the company. The company has neither obtained formal applications for jobs or recorded their personal information. As such there is no privy of the contract between the company and these drivers. These drivers are never been given any appointment letter by the company. As such drivers were never appointed as regular employees in accordance with recruitment policy or selection procedure of the public sector undertaking.</p> <p>11. According to the management, company never issued any appointment letter to these drivers nor their names are entered in the muster roll of the company. No service conditions of the company are applicable to them. They are never been workmen of the company. As such there is no employer employee relationship between the concerned workmen and the first party company.</p> <p>12. It is also case of the management that the other workmen whose services are regularized are the regular employees of the company and their services were regularized till 2009 in a phased manner purely in accordance with the procedure and policy of the company. So far concerned workmen, they cannot be equated to the regular employees of the company since the terms & conditions of the engagement of the said employees are totally different. In the absence of employer employee relationship there is no question of absorbing the concerned workmen in the services of the company. It has thus sought the dismissal of the reference.</p> <p>13. Following issues are framed at Ex.9. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:</p> <table style='white-space: pre-wrap;' border="1" class="dataframe"> <tbody> <tr> <td>Sr. No.</td> <td>Issues</td> <td>Findings</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>Whether the demand of second party for regularization of the services of &#10;Shri Santosh B. Surve and 13 other Drivers is legal and proper ?</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2.</td> <td>Whether the workmen under reference are entitled to be absorbed in the &#10;service ?</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3.</td> <td>What relief the workmen are entitled to ?</td> <td>No</td> </tr> <tr> <td>4.</td> <td>What order ?</td> <td>As per final order</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <span class="header-text">4009</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <h4>Reasons</h4> <h4>Issue No.1& 2.</h4> <p>14. It is well settled principle of law that the person who sets up a plea of existence of relationship of employer and employee the burden would be upon him. The burden of proof being the workmen to establish employer employee relationship is on the workmen and therefore no adverse inference can be drawn against the employer that if he would have produced the documents then the documents would have been proved employer employee relation. As per settled position where the person asserts that he was the workmen of the company and it is denied by the company, it is for the concerned workmen to prove the fact. It is not for the company to prove that he was not an employee of the company but of some other person. The question whether relation between the parties is one of the employer & employee is a pure question of fact. This is precisely the question of fact which has to be considered while deciding this issue on the basis of evidence of the parties concerned.</p> <p>15. So far contentions go, it is the contention of the concerned workmen that they were working as drivers for the senior Executives of the Corporation on full time basis. It is their contention that they are the direct employees of the Corporation since the vehicle drivers used to drive are owned by the Corporation and petrol, maintenance etc. of these vehicles are spent from the Corporation fund and even after the Executive is transferred the same driver continues to work.</p> <p>16. As against this, it is the contention of the first party that the senior Executives and branch Managers have been allotted with the official vehicles. They are eligible to engage the services of the drivers on their own and claim permissible reimbursement. In view of this even it is admitted that the vehicles, drivers used to drive own by the Corporation, the concerned drivers cannot claim their direct relationship as employer employee with the Corporation.</p> <p>It is because it is not unusual for public sector undertaking to give allowances to its highly level officers leaving to them to engage the services of the drivers or others for fulfilling the needs for which the allowances are meant. There is nothing on record to make out the nexus between the Corporation and the concerned drivers. There is nothing on record to indicate that control & directions of the drivers vested in the Corporation. In the absence of material to make out that the concerned drivers were employed by the Corporation & was under its directions and control, were paid the salary by the Corporation or otherwise were included in the army of employees of Corporation. It cannot be assumed that there exists employer employee relationship between the Corporation and the concerned employees.</p> <p>17. On going through the record, it is clear that the concerned workmen have not adduced evidence nor filed documents on record to prove their claim. Union remained absent and therefore in the absence of union, evidence of the concerned workmen it will have to be said that the concerned workmen have not established that they are direct employees of the company having controlled by the company and were paid by the company itself.</p> <p>18. Learned Counsel for the first party company pointed out that the contractor had agreed to provide car drivers to the first party company in return for a fixed consideration. 7 of the drivers continued to be engaged as drivers of the first party officials through the contractor and rest 7 drivers had already left the job. That would again show that the concerned workmen were the employees of the contractor and as such there was no master servant relationship between the first party company and the concerned drivers.</p> <p>19. Even then the concerned drivers have come out a case that 7 workmen were regularized through back door entry by the management and this fact was brought to the notice before the ALC [C]. Contention is also to the fact that many other vacancies are available for the post of drivers. Many recruitments are made, many employees are regularized and in the circumstances it was for the Corporation to consider the services of the concerned workmen who performed the same kind of work as the workmen, who are directly employed by the principal employer.</p> <p>20. Again the same finding holds good to consider that there is no iota of evidence or material on record to show that there exists vacancies which were filled by the Corporation and as such there was discrimination while making the appointments of the permanent drivers. In the absence of evidence, all these contentions of the concerned workmen shall fall out.</p> <p>21. For want of evidence it will have to be said that the concerned workmen are not entitled for regularization of the services. Their demand is not legal & proper. They are not entitled to be absorbed in service as they have not established employer employee relationship in between them and the Corporation, the first party No.1. The above issues are therefore answered accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.</p> <span class="header-text">4010 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>Issue No.3 & 4.</p> <p>22. In view of my findings to the issues, the workmen are not entitled to any relief. Hence the order.</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.</p> <p>M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer Dated, 09.3.2018.</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 836.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, डाकघर के अध्ीक्षक, डाक विभाग, सुरेंद्रनगर ;गुजरातद्ध एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटीए- 37/2013द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40011/24/2012-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 836.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA-37/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Superintendent of Post Offices, Department of Posts, Surendranagar (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40011/24/2012-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd April, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No- 37/2013</h4> <p>The Supdt. Of Post Offices, Department of Posts, Surendranagar Division, Near Tower, 2nd Floor, Surendranagar (Gujarat) – 363001 …First Party/Opponent</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>The President, Association of Railway and Post Employees, 15, Shashi Apartments, Bhatta Cross Road, Vasna, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380007 …Second Party/Applicant</p> <p>For the First Party No : Shri P.M. Rami For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak<span class="header-text">4011</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/ 24/2012–IR(DU) dated 25.02.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division,</h4> <h4>Surendranagar in withdrawing temporary status given to Shri Manubhai V. Rajgorw.e.f. 13.01.2011 is</h4> <h4>justified? If not, what benefit Shri M.V. Rajgor is entitled on the basis of his services given to the</h4> <h4>management?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 25.02.2013. The applicant/workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 alleging that the applicant/workman was engaged as causal labour by the opposite party Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division, Surendranagar, since 01.09.1985 and he has been performing his duties for 8 hours a day continuously with satisfaction to the opposite party with artificial rates to deprive him from his legal rights in the service. The opposite party issued him an appointment letter to be appointed as EDA and reduced his salary for 4 hours a day despite the fact that he was performing his duties for 8½ hours a day. He has been continuously making request to be given the benefits of Group D, TS etc. The opposite party forcibly took an undertaking which is nullity while granting the benefits of Group D vide office order dated 03/04.12.2009 and he was permitted to join the duty as Group D at Limbdi w.e.f. 10.12.2009. He has further alleged that the opposite party withdrew his benefits of Group D and his salary was reduced from Rs. 8323/- to Rs. 6344/- vide order dated 15.01.2011. The applicant/workman made the representation on 30.08.2011 and 01.06.2012 but to not result. Thus he has prayed for setting aside the order dated 13(15).01.2011 and has prayed for grant of temporary status to the workman.</p> <p>2. The opposite party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 denying the allegations made in the statement of claim submitting that it is incorrect to say that he had been working 8 hours a day from 01.09.1985 to 15.12.1988. The submission of the applicant/workman is not correct and true. His submission regarding engagement 8 hours daily from 01.09.1985 to 15.12.1988 is also not correct. As no recruitment/procedure was observed while engaging the applicant. He was engaged in piecemeal basis against leave/vacancy of Group D cadre and was engaged as outsider on rate applicable to casual labour as per the prevailing arrangement to manage the work through short term leave/absentee's arrangement of the regular Group D employee of Sudamada SO. The opposite party further alleged that the submission of workman/applicant regarding artificial break and appointment order as EDA and for reduced salary for 4 hours daily and as paying salary for 4 hours only by the management and reported technique for depriving the right of the workman/applicant etc. are not correct and true. The truth is that the workman was engaged as outsider/casual labour at Sudamada SO vice Group D in short term leave/absentee during the year 1988. The post of GDS/MD-MC was created w.e.f. 31.03.1989 at Ninama BO (under Sudamada SO). The local notification was issued by SDI(P) Limbdi to fill up the post and copy of the same were given to all concerned i.e. Employment Exchange, Surendranagar, Sarpanch, Talati cum Mantri, Head Master Primary School Ninama College etc. M.V. Rajgor applied for the same and was selected for the post by the then SDI(P) and appointed at Limbdi vide Memo No. PF/EDCA/DA/Ninama dated 03.07.1990. M.V. Rajgor is still working as GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO. Thus, contention of the applicant is not correct that his duty hours were reduced from 8 hours to 4 hours by the management. The opposite party further alleged that it is also not correct and true that he was performing duty of 8 hours, prior to appointment in GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO w.e.f. 31.03.1989. In fact, in connection with to grant of temporary status in Group D cadre vide application dated 21.11.2008 of the applicant was forwarded to PMG Rajkot and as per PMG Rajkot letter No. R&E/2/MDC/2008 dated 28.04.2008/01.12.2008; it was directed to decide the case at Divisional level being a Group D cadre case. The case was again refer to RO Rajkot vide No. B2/Reptn/Misc/08 dated 08.02.2009 and the case again returned vide dated R&E/2/MDC/2008 directing to decide the case at Divisional level. Therefore, the case was decided by the then Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar and granted temporary status in Group D cadre to the applicant vide No. B2/Casual Labour/Ty. Status/9-10 dated 03.04.2009. Therefore, it was asked to RO Rajkot vide letter no. STA-2/Rig-20/Corr/2009 dated 09.04.2009 to intimate the reason for granting temporary status, followed by reminder dated 13.10.2010. A detailed report was submitted to the PMG Rajkot vide no. B2/Casual Labour/Ty. Status/9-10 dated 23.10.2010. It was directed vide RO Rajkot letter no. STA-2/Rlg/20/Corr/2010 dated 11.01.2011 to cancel the orders of granting temporary status of M.V. Rajgor and to restore the status quo. Therefore, the order of granted temporary status to Group D cadre dated 03.04.2009 was cancelled vide no. B2/Cancel Labour/Ty. Status/09-10 dated 12.01.2011 and relieved the application for his post w.e.f. 15.01.2011. That temporary status was granted by the then SPOs Surendranagar in accordance with The<span class="header-text">4012 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> Directorate, New Delhi letter no. 45-95/8-SPB-1 dated 12.04.1991, further circulated under RO Rajkot Memo NO. STA-2/PDR/Rlg-20/90 dated 30.04.1991. The applicant/workman never recruited in Group D cadre, after observing due formalities under departmental rules and regulation for regular vacancy of Group D cadre, he was engaged to manage the work for short term against leave/absentee of Group D, with clear instruction that, there will be no claim for regular appointment/absorption in the Group D cadre. The allegation regarding reduction of pay from Rs. 8323/- to Rs. 6344/- is also hereby denied and far from the truth. The applicant engagement in GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO (under Sudamada SO) after observing due formalities of recruitment in GDS cadre as per notification. M.V. Rajgor was applied for that post and was selected in GDS/MD-MC at Ninama PO. There is no relevancy of prior engagement in Group D in short term engagement at Sudamada SO with appointment as GDS/MD-MC Ninama BO in this case. Also the nature of work of casual labour, Group D and GDS MD Ninama BO is quite different and hence allegations of the workman are quite misleading one. The demand of the applicant for absorption in Group D cadre or to grant the temporary status in Group D cadre has no merit. The applicant belongs to the GDS category and appointed as GDS/MD Ninama BO (Sudamada SO) since 31.03.1989. His representation to grant of temporary status has also no merit as per the instruction of the Directorates Memo No. 45-95/8-PSB-1 dated 12.04.1991 is applicable to casual labour only not to GDS category. There are certain rules and regulations for recruitment of Group D cadre. The applicant was not fulfilled the required qualification/eligibility for the Group D cadre and therefore, his case is not admissible. The temporary status granted vides Office Memo No. B2/Casual Labour/Ty. Status/10-11 dated 03.05.2009 was cancelled vide letter No. even dated 12.01.2011 in accordance with PMG Rajkot Memo No. STA-2/Rlg-20/Corr./2010 dated 11.11.2011. The representation dated 31.01.2011 against the order of termination of temporary status to the DPS Rajkot was rejected as he was not in employment as casual labour on 29.11.1989. Therefore, the applicant has represented to the PMG Rajkot vide his application dated 17.05.2011 and same was rejected by PMG, Rajkot vide Memo No. STA-02/Rlg- 20/Corr/2011 dated 01.08.2011 that "The action of SPO Surendranagar to confer temporary status to Rajgor was not in order, as he was not working as casual labour on 29.11.1989". The request application dated 30.08.2011 addressed to the CPMG, Ahmedabad was not decided due to pending application with ALC, Gandhidham in accordance with C.O. Memo No. STA/44-29/R/Corr/2012 dated 27.08.2012 and now pending with CGIT, Ahmedabad. The opponent office is the office of the post department and as such it is not covered under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.</p> <p>3. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:</p> <p>I. Whether the action of the management of Superintendent of Post Offices, Surendranagar Division, Surendranagar in withdrawing temporary status given to Manubhai V. Rajgor w.e.f. 13.01.2011 is justified?</p> <p>II. To what benefit, if any, M.V. Rajgor is entitled on the basis of his services given to the management?</p> <p>4. Both these issues are interrelated and are decided together.</p> <p>5. Issue No. I and II: The burden of proof of these issues was lying on the workman who submitted his affidavit Ex. 8 wherein he has reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim and has not said anything contrary in his cross-examination. The opposite party filed the affidavit Ex. 9 of his witness Dilip Kumar Mohan Lal Bhavsar who has also reiterated the averments made in the written statement Ex. 6 but in his cross- examination, he has stated that temporary status was granted by one Atul Kumar Tiwari, the then Superintendent of Post Office, Surendranagar without following the due procedure. The department after deducting this irregularity did not take any action against Atul Kumar Tiwari. N.B. Kundari withdrew the temporary status of this workman as no Departmental Promotion Committee was formed and there was not such recommendation in the case of workman. It is true that no show-cause notice was given to the workman. This workman moved a representation against demotion and withdrawal of temporary status which was replaced before Reconciliation Officer. After withdrawal of temporary status on 11.01.2011, Departmental Promotion Committee was held but he stated that he doesn't remember the date of Departmental Promotion Committee. This workman was considered in the next Departmental Promotion Committee as the workman attained the age of 50 years but he doesn't know the date of birth of this workman. Thus the cross-examination reveals that the opposite party has failed to explain as to why this applicant/workman was not considered in the next Departmental Promotion Committee and secondly, as to what action was taken against the then errant Superintendent of Post Office who granted the temporary status to the applicant without following the due procedure. The witness has also failed to explain as to what action was taken on the representation made by the applicant/workman after withdrawal of the temporary status. Thus the cross-examination of the witness<span class="header-text">4013</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> does not justify the withdrawal of the temporary status of the applicant/workman. Thus in the light of the aforesaid evidence, I come to the conclusion that the withdrawal of temporary status of applicant/workman Manubhai V. Rajgor was not justified and liable to be quashed and set aside. Thus the Issue No. I is decided in negative and against the opposite party.</p> <p>6. On the basis of the aforesaid findings, the order dated 13.01.2011 passed by Superintendent of Post Office, Surendranagar Division regarding the withdrawal of the temporary status of the applicant/workman was unjustified. The applicant/workman is entitled for the temporary status from the date it was withdrawn i.e. 13.01.2011.</p> <p>7. The reference is disposed of accordingly. The first party is directed to restore temporary status of the applicant/workman Manubhai V. Rajgor from the date it was withdrawn. The award shall be given effect within 60 days from the publication of this award.</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 837.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, पफैक्टरी मैनेजर, राजनगर टेक्सटाइल मिल्स लिमिटेड, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके</p> <p>कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट</p> <p>;संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटीए-33/2016द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-42012/47/2016-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 837.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA-33/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Factory Manager, Rajnagar Textile Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-42012/47/2016-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 07th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No- 33/2016</h4> <p>The Factory Manager, Rajnagar Textile Mills Ltd. (A Unit of NTC), Babupura Haripura, Asarwa, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380016 …First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>Shri Ashok Parmar and others, C/o Factory Manager, Rajnagar Textiles Mills Ltd., Babupura Haripura, Asarwa, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) …Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : None</p> <p>For the Second Party : None<span class="header-text">4014 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42012/ 47/2016–IR(DU) dated 02.05.2016 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the demands of Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 Badli workers against the management of Rajnagar</h4> <h4>Textiles Mills Ltd., (A Unit of NTC), Ahmedabad for regularised in permanent service or with permanent pass</h4> <h4>and for the demand of basic wage with DA as per BIR Cotton Textile Mill are justified? If so, then what relief</h4> <h4>Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 workers are entitled to?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 02.05.2016. Notice Ex. 2 was sent to both the parties. Acknowledgement of notice Ex. 3 to the first party was received but neither the acknowledgement of the notice nor the notice being served, is received back for the second party. Thus the second party is also deemed served in the month of December, 2016 but despite a lapse of more than a year, neither of the parties has appeared nor filed their statement of claim or written statement as the case may be.</p> <p>2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the case.</p> <p>3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the observation as under: "the demands of Shri Ashok Parmar and 437 Badli workers against the management of Rajnagar Textiles Mills Ltd., (A Unit of NTC), Ahmedabad for regularised in permanent service or with permanent pass and for the demand of basic wage with DA as per BIR Cotton Textile Mill cannot be said to be justified."</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 838.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, दूरसंचार जिला अभियंता, दूरसंचार विभाग, जामनगर ;गुजरातद्ध और अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों</p> <p>के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ</p> <p>सीजीआईटीए संख्या 1092/2004द्ध प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40012/52/1997-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 838.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA No. 1092/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Telecom District Engineer, Telecom Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat) & others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40012/52/1997-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No- 1092/2004</h4> <p>1. The Telecom District Engineer,</p> <p>Telecom Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat) – 361001<span class="header-text">4015</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> 2. The Assistant Engineer,</p> <p>Microwave Maintainance, Khambalia – 361305</p> <p>3. The Divisional Engineer,</p> <p>Telecom Microwave Maintainance, K.R. Telephone Exchange, Rajkot – 360001</p> <p>4. The Divisional Engineer,</p> <p>Telecom Microwave Maintainance, K.R. Telephone Exchange, Ahmedabad – 360001 …First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia, C/o Shri G.S. Uppal, Plot No. 381, Ward No. 2-B, Adipur, Kutch (Gujarat) – 370205 …Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi</p> <p>For the Second Party : None</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/ 52/97–IR(DU) dated 16.04.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar/ Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave</h4> <h4>Maintenance, Ahmedabad/Rajkot and Asstt. Engineer, Microwave Maintenance, Khambhalia, in not taking on</h4> <h4>duties/discontinuance/terminating the services of Shri Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia w.e.f. 02.01.1989 just,</h4> <h4>valid and legal? If not, what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the</h4> <h4>matter?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 16.04.1998.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on 06.11.1999 alleging that he was appointed on 15.04.1987 as a casual labour and was terminated in 1989. He worked for more than 240 days in each and every calendar year. He was not served any notice or paying notice pay while terminating his services in the year 1989. He was terminated without any reason retaining the junior workman in the service despite having seniority list of all the workmen.</p> <p>2. The first party denied all the facts in the written statement Ex. 6 alleging that this workman challenged his termination in the Central Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 751 to 757 of 1988 along with number of workmen wherein the Central Administrative Tribunal disposed of the aforesaid petitions observing that the termination order was legal as respondents has offered compensation, therefore, respondents have paid the one month pay.</p> <p>3. The second party Ravidas Madhavdas Sarpadadia submitted his affidavit Ex. 21 admitting the facts that they challenged the termination order in the Central Administrative Tribunal but refused to accept the compensation amount of Rs. 922/- sent by the first party.</p> <p>4. The first party submitted the affidavit of his witness Deepak Kantilal Shah reiterating the averments made in the written statement.</p> <p>5. The second party did not turn up and offered himself for cross-examination and also did not appear to cross- examine the first party witness.</p> <p>6. The judgement of the Central Administrative Tribunal in aforesaid petitions OA No. 751 to 757 of 1988 has not been challenged in the higher court. Thus, it has attained the finality and cannot be adjudicated by this tribunal being the res-judicata. Hence the reference has no force and liable to be dismissed.</p> <p>7. This is the award of this tribunal that the reference is disposed of as per the observations above.</p> <p>P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer<span class="header-text">4016 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 839.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, जिला अभियंता, बीएसएनएल, पालनपुर ;बीकेद्ध एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में</p> <p>निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ सीजीआईटीए संख्या</p> <p>1198/2004द्ध प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40011/35/2001-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 839.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. CGITA No. 1198/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the District Engineer, BSNL, Palanpur (B.K.) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40011/35/2001-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No- 1198/2004</h4> <p>The District Engineer, BSNL, O/o The General Manager Telecom District, District Banaskantha, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 …First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>The President, Saurashtra Employees Unoin, City Shops, 3rd Floor, Opp. Jagnath Police Chowky, Dr. Yagnik Road, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi</p> <p>For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/ 35/2001–IR(DU) dated 21.05.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department, Palanpur to discontinue the services of</h4> <h4>Shri Ajay Kumar Pal and not to give employment is justified or legal? If not, what relief the workman is</h4> <h4>entitled for and since when?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 21.05.2002. After receiving the notice, the workman Ajay Kumar Pal, hereinafter, referred to as "second party" submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 alleging that he was appointed as a casual labour by the The District Engineer, BSNL, O/o The General Manager Telecom District, District Banaskantha, Palanpur, hereinafter, referred to as "first party" on 01.06.1989 and he continued to work till 30.09.1990. Again he was allowed to work from 01.07.1995 till 01.06.1998 when his services were orally terminated without following the pre-conditions of the Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act. He was allowed to work from 01.08.1997 on voucher basis under SDO, Telephones, Palanpur but his name was not shown in the<span class="header-text">4017</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> muster roll where he continued to work till 01.06.1998. All the details are submitted by him. On the above details, it can be said that he worked continuously more than 240 days in the last preceding 12 months prior to termination of his services w.e.f. 01.06.1989 which was illegal and void due to not following the procedure given in Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that a workman junior to him has been retained in service and many of them have been regularised, thus it was violative of provisions of Section 25 G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that under the scheme of the Telecom Department, he was entitled for the temporary status and also to be appointed as regular mazdoor which was denied illegally with a malafide intention. Thus he has prayed for quashing the impugned termination order and reinstatement with back wages.</p> <p>2. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 stating that the demand of the second party union is false, concocted and against the provisions of law. The workman worked under The General Manager Telecom District, District Banaskantha, Palanpur during the period stated in the statement of claim. Therefore, this tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. He had been working as a temporary daily wage basis from 01.07.1989 and was given work according to the requirement of department as a unskilled labour and was paid minimum wages according to Government Rules. The workman resumed duty on 01.07.1995 and left the work in August, 1995 voluntarily. Thereafter, he worked for some time in the year 1997 and 1998. He also moved to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) where he was directed to approach the proper forum. It is wrong to say that he was removed arbitrary and with a malafide intention.</p> <p>3. All the documents referred in the statement of claim as well as in the written statement have been filed by the respective parties.</p> <p>4. On the basis of the pleading, the following issues arise:</p> <p>i. Whether the action of the management of Telecom Department, Palanpur to discontinue the services of Shri Ajay Kumar Pal and not to give employment is justified or legal?</p> <p>ii. If not, to what relief, if any, the workman is entitled for and since when?</p> <p>5. As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together.</p> <p>6. Issue No. i and ii: The burden of prove of these aforesaid issues was on the second party workman. The workman Ajay Kumar Pal submitted his affidavit Ex. 14 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 2. He has not said anything contrary to what he has stated in the affidavit.</p> <p>7. The first party submitted the affidavit Ex. 16 of Lakhubhai Dosjibhai Deria, The Assistant General Manager in the office of General Manager, Telecom, Palanpur, and he stated on oath that the workman was engaged as per requirement of the department on need basis as daily wager on 01.07.1989. He worked for 178 days in the year 1989, 337 days in the year 1990, 262 days in the year 1991, 277 days in the year 1992 and 56 days in the year 1993 and thereafter left the work at his own accord. In the year 1994, he did not work but he worked for 52 days in the year 1995 and left the work again at his own accord. He was engaged in the year 1996. Lakhubhai Dosjibhai Deria again stated that the workman worked for 137 days in the year 1997 and 128 days in the year 1998 and again left the job at his own accord. Thus the concerned workman did not work for more than 240 days during the tenure of his service during last 5 years. He was engaged without following due procedure. The work assigned to the workman was not of permanent nature and the said work is now being done by the labour contractor and the Central Government has imposed the ban on the engagement of casual/daily wagers. The second party workman was paid remuneration on vouchers on the basis of his attendance recorded in the muster roll. He was not entitled for any other benefits except wages. The second party workman left the work at his own accord, hence, the question of issuing notice or paying retrenchment or notice pay, did not arise. The workman was not following under the criteria of temporary status; therefore, he was not absorbed. The other casual workers who were eligible were permitted to continue and the rest were not re-engaged. This workman cannot be re-engaged as the said work now being done by the labour contractor. Hence the dispute raised is liable to be dismissed. In his cross-examination, he has stated that the workman from whom the work is taken on ACG 17 are separately registered and the salary is paid on vouchers but he has not brought those vouchers. The workman was on muster roll up to 1993, thereafter on ACG 17. The workman was working as a labour for digging the trench. He has further stated that a workman, who has worked for more than 240 days, would have the temporary status. He can produced the attendance record of the second party if available prior to 01.06.1998. The second party workman has worked for more than 240 days in some of the years but he did not work for more than 240 days in the preceding year to the date 01.06.1998. He was not given any notice or notice pay.</p> <p>8. The second party has referred Devinder Singh V/s Municipal Counsel, Sanaur, 2011 Law Suit (SC) 475, wherein the apex court confirmed the order of reinstatement of the workman by the Labour Court wherein the<span class="header-text">4018 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> workman worked for more than 240 days in the calendar year preceding the termination of his service from the date w.e.f. 30.09..1996 without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has also referred Jasbir Singh V/s State of Haryana, Civil Appeal Number 346 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1532 of 2014), wherein the apex court confirmed the award of Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court reinstating the workman on the ground that the services of the workman were terminated on 31.12.1993 without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further referred Deepali Gundu Surwase V/s Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya and other, 2013 Law Suit (SC) 994. The said judgement relates to a case where the Head Mistress of the Vidyalaya address a letter to all the teachers to contribute Rs. 1500/- per month towards the tax liability which the appellant refused, consequently, the management issued 25 Memo to the appellant and put him under suspension. The apex court ordered reinstatement, confirming the order of the tribunal. As the facts of this judgement are different to this case, hence no applicability in the case. He has further referred an old case of the apex court Surendra Kumar Verma V/s Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, New Delhi, 1980 Law Suit (SC) 412, wherein the apex court observed that the provisions Section 25 B(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, are plain enough and are reproduced as under:</p> <p>"[25 B. Definition of continuous service – For the purposes of this Chapter,-</p> <p>(1) A workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;</p> <p>(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-</p> <p>(a) For a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than-</p> <p>(i) One hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine;</p> <p>and</p> <p>(ii) Two hundred and forty days, in any other case;</p> <p>(b) For a period of six month, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than-</p> <p>(i) Ninety-five days, in the case of workman employed below ground in a mine; and</p> <p>(ii) One hundred and twenty days, in any other case.</p> <p>Explanation – for the purposes of clause (2), the number of days on which a workman has actually worked under an employer shall include the days on which-</p> <p>(i) He has been laid-off under an agreement or as permitted by standing orders made under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (20 of 1946), or under the act or under any other law applicable to the industrial establishment;</p> <p>(ii) He has been on leave with full wages, earned in the previous years;</p> <p>(iii) He has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; and</p> <p>(iv) In the case of a female, she has been on maternity leave; so, however, that the total period of such maternity leave does not exceed twelve weeks.]"</p> <p>It is further observed by the apex court that under Section 25 F, the workman should be in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer and under Section 25 B(2), even if a workman has not been in continuous service under an employer for a period of one year, he shall deemed to have been in such continuous service for a period of one year if he has actually worked under the employer for 240 days in the preceding period of 12 month. There is no stipulation that he should have been in employment or service under the employer for a whole period of 12 months. The apex court allowed all the appeals and reinstated the appellants without full back wages in all those appeals where the workmen have worked for 240 days in the period of 12 months. It is not necessary that he should have been in the service of employer for one whole year.</p> <span class="header-text">4019</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> <p>9. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that the second party workman worked for 178 days in the year 1989, 337 days in the year 1990, 262 days in the year 1991, 277 days in the year 1992 and 56 days in the year 1993 and thereafter left the work at his own accord. In the year 1994, he did not work. But he worked for 52 days in the year 1995 and left the work again at his own accord. He was engaged in the year 1996. He again stated that the workman worked for 137 days in the year 1997 and 128 days in the year 1998. The only issue is that he worked for more than 240 days in some of the years.</p> <p>10. Though the learned counsel of the first party has referred Himanshu Kumar Vidharthi V/s State of Bihar, 1997 (76) FLR SC Page 237, wherein the apex court has observed as under:</p> <p>"Admittedly, they were not appointed to the posts in accordance with the rules but were engaged on the basis of need of the work. They are temporary employees working on daily wages. Under these circumstances, their disengagement from service cannot be construed to be a retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act. The concept of "retrenchment", therefore, cannot be stretched to such an extent as to cover these employees. Since they are only daily-wage employees and have no right to the posts, their disengagement is not arbitrary."</p> <p>The first party has further referred Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghathan and Anr. V/s S.C. Sharma, (2005) LLR SC 275, wherein the apex court has observed as under:</p> <p>"For dispensation of holding of an enquiry before termination of an employee, it is imperative for the employer to record a conclusion that it was not reasonably practicable to hold the enquiry proceedings even when the employee was absconding and not responding to the notices as such his termination sans enquiry will be set aside.</p> <p>For entitlement of back wages on reinstatement of an employer, the initial burden lies upon the employee that he was not gainfully employed and thereafter the employer can rebut the same.</p> <p>When the employee as directed to be reinstated in service with back wages by the Tribunals and High Court, he will not be entitled to back wages since he has neither pleaded nor placed any material that he was not gainfully employed."</p> <p>11. The main argument of the advocate for the first party is that the workman left the job at his own accord; therefore, he cannot take advantage of his own fault. But the first party has not submitted the attendance register/muster roll of the questioned period which may established the willingly leaving the job by the workman. The reference is of 21.05.2002 and the workman served the first party from 1989 to 1998. The workman has not disclosed in his evidence as to who the junior workers were engaged or re-engaged but it has also not been specifically denied by the first party. The workman must have attained the age of 30 years in the year 2003, now he would have attained the age of 45 years, so it cannot be said that he has lost his utility in the service.</p> <p>12. It is established in the absence of the evidence by the first party that the workman was retrenched without giving notice and notice pay. Thus the reference deserves to be allowed. As the first party witness has admitted that the workmen, who served for 240 days, are granted temporary status, same shall be given in this case. Therefore, the second party workman Ajay Kumar Pal shall be reinstated in service without paying back wages on the principle of "no work no pay". Both the issues are decided in the light of the aforesaid observations and the first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman within 60 days from the publication of this award.</p> <p>13. The award is passed accordingly.</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 840.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, महाप्रबंध्क ;पफोनद्ध, दूरसंचार विभाग, राजकोट ;गुजरातद्ध और उनके कर्मचारी और अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच</p> <p>अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ ;सीजीआईटीएद्ध</p> <p>सं.-1018/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40012/80/1994-आईआर ;डी.यू.द्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक<span class="header-text">4020 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 840.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1018/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager (Phones), Telecom Department, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman & Other, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40012/80/1994-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1018/2004</h4> <p>The General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom, Behind Girnar Talkies, Rajkot (Gujarat)</p> <p>…First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>1. Shri Popatlal Dudabhai Tank,</p> <p>Baroda Pristege, Jagdishnagar, Mohanbhai Zarkiy Building, Gala No. 2, Surat (Gujarat)</p> <p>2. The President,</p> <p>Saurashtra Employees Union, City Shops, Dr. Yagnik Road, Opp. Jagnath Police Chowki, Rajkot (Gujarat)</p> <p>…Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval</p> <p>For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/80/94–IR(DU) dated 28.08.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom, Behind</h4> <h4>Girnar Cinema, Rajkot – 360001, in terminating the services of Shri Popatlal D. Tank, Casual Labourer is</h4> <h4>legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 28.08.1996. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement on 13.04.1998 and 29.07.1998 respectively along with number of documents. The case was listed for hearing but since then second party has been absent and has refrained to appear before the tribunal for hearing. Today on 15.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman has not been in her contact since long.</p> <p>2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.</p> <p>3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: "the action of the management of General Manager (Phones), Department of Telecom,<span class="header-text">4021</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> Behind Girnar Cinema, Rajkot – 360001, in terminating the services of Shri Popatlal D. Tank, Casual Labourer can be said to be legal and justified."</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 841.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, महाप्रबंध्क दूरसंचार विभाग, राजकोट ;गुजरातद्ध एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ ;सीजीआईटीएद्ध संख्या-</p> <p>1098/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40012/21/1997-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 841.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1098/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager, Telecom Department, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40012/21/1997-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1098/2004</h4> <p>The General Manager, Telecom Department, 3rd Floor, Umesh Commercial Complex, Near Chaudhary High School, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>Shri Kiritkumar Bhanushankar Pandya, Gaikwadi, 1/10, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval</p> <p>For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/21/97–IR(DU) dated 13.05.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of The General Manager, Telecom Deptt., Rajkot in terminating the</h4> <h4>services of Shri K.B. Pandya is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 13.05.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but the second party failed to appear for his cross examination on his affidavit Ex. 12 by which his examination chief was recorded on 24.04.2002. The second party also has been absent since last several dates for cross examination.</p> <span class="header-text">4022 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>Today on 08.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman has not been in her contact since long.</p> <p>2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.</p> <p>3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: "the action of the management of The General Manager, Telecom Deptt., Rajkot in terminating the services of Shri K.B. Pandya can be said to be legal and justified."</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 842.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, डिवीजनल इंजीनियर, टेलीकॉम माइक्रोवेव प्रोजेक्ट, राजकोट ;गुजरातद्ध और अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ ;सीजीआईटीएद्ध संख्या-1147/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40012/42/1998-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 842.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-1147/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot (Gujarat) & Other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40012/42/1998-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 08th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No.- 1147/2004</h4> <p>1. The Divisional Engineer,</p> <p>Telecom, Microwave Project, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001</p> <p>2. The Sub-Divisional Officer,</p> <p>Telegraphs, Microwave Maintenance, Jamnagar (Gujarat) – 361001 …First Party</p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>The President, Saurashtra Employees Union, Umesh Commercial Complex, 2nd Floor, Office No. 213 and 214, Near Chaudhary High School, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi</p> <p>For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani<span class="header-text">4023</span> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 26, 2018/ज्येष्ठ 5, 1940</span> </p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/42/98–IR(DU) dated 30.11.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot in terminating the</h4> <h4>services of Shri Kishoregiri Vajugiri Aparnathi, Casual Labour is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the</h4> <h4>workman is entitled?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 30.11.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but he has been absent since last several dates for submitting his evidence.</p> <p>2. Today on 08.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman has not been in her contact since long. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.</p> <p>3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: "the action of the Divisional Engineer, Telecom Microwave Project, Rajkot in terminating the services of Shri Kishoregiri Vajugiri Aparnathi, Casual Labour can be said to be legal and justified."</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 21 मई, 2018</h4> <p>का.आ. 843.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार, महाप्रबंध्क बीएसएनएल, राजकोट ;गुजरातद्ध और अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में</p> <p>निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद पंचाट ;संदर्भ ;सीजीआईटीएद्ध संख्या-</p> <p>107/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02.04.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।</p> <p>[सं. एल-40012/42/2007-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]</p> <p>राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st May, 2018</h4> <p>S.O. 843.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. (CGITA) No.-107/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager, BSNL, Rajkot (Gujarat) and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.04.2018.</p> <p>[No. L-40012/42/2007-IR (DU)]</p> <p>RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,</h4> <h4>AHMEDABAD</h4> <p>Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,</p> <p>Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,</p> <p>Ahmedabad, Dated 15th March, 2018</p> <h4>Reference: (CGITA) No.- 107/2007</h4> <p>1. The General Manager,</p> <p>Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Telecom Distt., Near Girnar Talkies, Rajkot (Gujarat)</p> <p>2. The Sub-Divisional Engineer, Department of Telecom, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Jasdan …First Party<span class="header-text">4024 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 26, 2018/JYAISTHA 5, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>V/s</h4> <p>The Joint Secretary, Saurashtra Employees Union, City Shops, Dr. Yagnik Road, Opp. Jagnath Polic Chowki, Rajkot (Gujarat)</p> <p>…Second Party</p> <p>For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval</p> <p>For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/42/2007–IR(DU) dated 09.10.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:</p> <h4>SCHEDULE</h4> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in terminating the services of their</h4> <h4>workman Shri Vinod B. Kiri, w.e.f. 12.12.2005 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is</h4> <h4>entitled?"</h4> <p>1. The reference dates back to 09.10.2007. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim Ex. 9 and written statement Ex. 13 on 30.09.2008 and 24.04.2009 respectively along with number of documents. The case was listed for evidence of second party but since then second party has been absent and has refrained to lead evidence. Today on 15.03.2018, the advocate for the second party workman Mrs. K.L. Kalwani stated that the workman has not been in her contact since long.</p> <p>2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.</p> <p>3. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in terminating the services of their workman Shri Vinod B. Kiri, w.e.f. 12.12.2005 can be said to be legal and justified."</p> <p>P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer</p> <p>Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.</p> <section class="footnotes"> <hr> <ol> <li id="fn-11-2" value="2">डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 2 डिजिट और 8 डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित 2 Whereas it is the stated intent of the Government calling for a mind-set shift from facilitating and protecting agricultural trade at predefined locations accessible to farmers, towards one that expands the market ecosystem, encompasses a wider array of participants and empowers farmers to access locations further afield is required. <a href="#fnref-11-2">↩</a></li> <li id="fn-11-4" value="4">----िडिजटिडिजटिडिजटिडिजट,,,, <a href="#fnref-11-4">↩</a></li> <li id="fn-11-8" value="8">डिजिट एचएस कोडों सहित <a href="#fnref-11-8">↩</a></li> <li id="fn-11-6666" value="6666">----डिजिट और <a href="#fnref-11-6666">↩</a></li> </ol> </section> </body> </html>

Cite this issue. Weekly Gazette of India, Government of India, 26 May 2018. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.central.w.2018-05-26.186515/. Archive identifier in.gazette.central.w.2018-05-26.186515.