Gazette contains multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05 REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक WEEKLY

सं. 9] नई दिल्ली, पफरवरी 24—मार्च 2, 2019, शनिवार/पफाल्गुन 5—पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

No. 9] NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 24—MARCH 2, 2019, SATURDAY/ PHALGUNA 5— PHALGUNA 11, 1940

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालयवित्त मंत्रालय

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग) (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग) (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग) (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग)

(सतर्क ता अनुभाग) (सतर्क ता अनुभाग) (सतर्क ता अनुभाग) (सतर्क ता अनुभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 286286286286....————इस विभाग की दिनांक 05.02.2018 की अधिसूचना संख्या 22/4/2003-सतर्क ता (खंड-III) के अनु%म में और िवशेष न्यायालय (प्रतिभूति सं*वहार अपराध िवचारण) अिधिनयम, 1992 की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (i) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा विशेष न्यायालय (प्रतिभूति सं*वहार अपराध िवचारण) अिधिनयम, 1992 के अंतर्गत 67,000/- ;पए + 3% की दर से वा?र्षक वेतनवृAि – 79,000/- ;पए के एचएजी वेतनमान में प्रतिनियुक्ति के आधार पर अभिरक्षक के पद पर Eी जयंती प्रसाद (आईए एंड एएस: 1986) के कार्यकाल को दिनांक 15.01.2019 से एक और वर्ष की अवधि के लिए या अभिरक्षक के कार्यालय के बंद होने तक या अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, बढ़ाती है।

[फा. सं. 22/4/2003-सतर्क ता (खंड-III)]

सुचीन्6 मिE, संयुक्त सिचव

1074 GI/2019

(915)916 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

(VIGILANCE SECTION)

New Delhi, the 25th February, 2019

S.O. 286.—In continuation of this Department's Notification No. 22/4/2003/VIG (Vol.III) dated 05.02.2018 and in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (i) of Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, the Central Government hereby extends the tenure of Sh. Jayanti Prasad (IA & AS: 1986) as Custodian on deputation basis in the HAG Scale of Rs. 67000 + annual increment @ 3% - 79000/- (pre- revised) under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 for a further period of one year w.e.f. 15.01.2019 or till the Office of Custodian is wound up, or till further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. 22/4/2003/Vig. (Vol.III)]

SUCHINDRA MISRA, Jt. Secy.

पेपेपेपेट्रोट्रोट्रोट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी, 2019

का.का.का.का. आ. आ. आ. आ. 287287287287....————के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोिलयम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम 1962, (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खMड (अ) के अनुसरण में 18 अगस्त, 2012 को भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित, भारत सरकार के पेRोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2619 तारीख 26 जुलाई, 2012 में निम्नलिखित रूप में संशोधन करती है,

"Eी अनिल कु मार सिंह, मुख्य प्रबन्धक, इंिडयन ऑयल कापWरेशन लिमिटेड, मथुरा-जालंधर पाइपलाइन" शब्दों के स्थान पर, "Eी शरद चन्6, वरिष्ठ प्रबन्धक (एचएसई)," शब्द रखे जाएंगे।

यह अिधसूचना जारी होने की तारीख से लागू होगी ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/19/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27024]

शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S. O. 287.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. 2619 dated 26th July 2012, published in the Gazette of India on 18th August, 2012 namely:

In the said notification, for the words "Shri Anil Kumar Singh, Chief Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Mathura-Jalandhar Pipeline Bijwasan" the words "Shri Sharad Chandra, Senior Manager (HSE)" shall be substituted.

The notification is applicable from the date of issue.

[F. No. R-11025(11)/19/2018-OR-I/E-27024]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

917 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 288-&deZpkjh jkT; chek vf/kfu;e 1948 ¼1948 dk 34½ dh /kkjk&1 dh mi /kkjk ¼3½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dsUnzh; ljdkj ,rn~}kjk 1 ekpZ] 2019 dks ml rkjh[k ds :i esa fu;r djrh gS] ftldks mDr vf/kfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ¼44 o 45 /kkjk ds flok; tks igys ls izo`Rr gks pqdh gS½ v/;k;&5 vkSj 6 [/kkjk&76 dh mi /kkjk&¼1½ vkSj /kkjk&77] 78]79 vkSj 81 ds flok; tks igys gh izo`Rr dh tk pqdh gS] ds mica/k xqtjkr jkT; ds fuEufyf[kr {ks=ksa esa izo`Rr gksaxs] vFkkZr~%&

xqtjkr jkT; ds oMksnjk ftys dh laiw.kZ lhekvksa esa] tgkWa d-jk-ch- vf/kfu;e ds mica/k igys gh ykxw gSa] ds vfrfjDr Hkh izo`Rr gksaxsA

[la- ,l&38013@01@2019&,l-,l-I]

larks'k dqekj flag] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2019

S.O. 288.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st March, 2019 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Section 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas of State of Gujarat namely:-

"The areas comprising within the limits of Vadodara District, in Gujarat State excluding the areas where the provisions of ESI Act have already been brought into force."

[No. S-38013/01/2019-S.S.I]

S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी, 2019

का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 289289289289....————कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अिधिनयम 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा (3) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, कें 6ीय सरकार एत7ारा 1 अप्रैल, 2019 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 [धारा 76 की उप धारा-

(1) और धारा-77, 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है] के उपबंध महाराष्ट्र राज्य में संबंधित तहसील तथा जिलों के साथ-साथ में कॉलम–2 में %.सं. 1 से 8 पर उल्लिखित आठ जिलों के जिला मुख्यालय के नगरपािलका सीमाओं के अंतर्गत संपूर्ण क्षेत्रों तथा (कॉलम-2 में %ं . सं. 9) सिंधुदुर्ग जिले के ओरोस जिला परिषद की सीमाओं में शामिल सभी क्षेत्रों और कॉलम–3 में उल्लिखित एमआइडीसी क्षेत्रों के सभी राजस्व hाम में प्रवृत्त होंगे, नामत:

.सं.	क जिलों के नाम जिलों क क े नाम	एमआइडीसी क्षेत्र का नाम	तहसील का नाम
1	2	3	4
1.	यवतमाल	यवतमाल	यवतमाल
		अतिरिक् त यवतमाल
2.	भंडारा	भंडारा (गडेगांव)	भंडारा, लखानी
3.	जालना	जालना
		अतिरिक् त जालना I
		अतिरिक् त जालना II
		अतिरिक् त जालना III	जालना
		अ ंबड (जालना)	अ ंबड
4.	बीड	बीड	बीड
5.	लातूर	लातूर	लातूर
		अतिरिक् त लातूर
		औसा फे ज I	औसा
6.	उस् मानाबाद	उस् मानाबाद	उस् मानाबाद
7.	परभनी	-	परभनी
8.	अहमद नगर	अहमद नगर	अहमद नगर
		Eीरामपुर	Eीरामपुर, रहाटा
		सुपा पारनेर	पारनेर
9.	सिंधुदुर्ग	क ु डल	क ु डल

918 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[सं. एस-38013/02/2019-एस.एस.I]

संतोष कु मार सिंह, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2019

S.O. 289.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st April, 2019 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI [except Sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Section 77,78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of said Act shall come into force in the areas within the Municipal Limits of District Headquarters of Districts specified at Sl. No. 1 to 8 in Column 2 and areas within the Zila Parishad limit of Oros of Sindhudurg District (Sl. No. 9 in Column 2) and in all revenue villages comprising MIDC areas specified in column 3 mentioned along with respective tehsils & Districts in the State of Maharashtra, namely:-

Sl. No.	Name of Districts	Name of MIDC Area	Name of Tehsil
1	2	3	4
1.	Yavatmal	Yavatmal	Yavatmal
		Addl. Yavatmal
2.	Bhandara	Bhandara (Gadegaon)	Bhandara, Lakhani
3.	Jalna	Jalna	Jalna
		Addl. Jalna I
		Addl. Jalna II
		Addl. Jalna III
		Ambad (Jalna)	Ambad
4.	Beed	Beed	Beed
5.	Latur	Latur	Latur
		Additional Latur
		Ausa Phase I	Ausa
6.	Osmanabad	Osmanabad	Osmanabad
7.	Parabhani	Nil	Parabhani
8.	Ahmednagar	Ahmednagar	Ahmednagar
		Shrirampur	Shrirampur, Rahata
		Supa Parner	Parner
9.	Sindhudurg	Kudal	Kudal

919 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

[No. S-38013/02/2019-S.S.I]

S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 290-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ th,evkj ,uthZ fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 251@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&11012@29@2017&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2019

S.O. 290.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi (Ref. No. 251/2017) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. GMR Energy Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14.02.2019.

[No. L-11012/29/2017-IR(CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No.1: ROOM No. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075

ID No.251/2017

Shri Gajraj Singh S/o Shri Raja Ram, R/o House No.922, Holi Chowk, Near Post Office, Mahipalpur, New Delhi – 110 027

…Workman

Versus

(i) M/s. GMR Energy Limited, O/o DIAL, New Udaan Bhawan, Opposite Terminal-3, Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi – 110 037

(ii) M/s. Quess Corp. Limited, B-1/1 1st Floor, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, New Delhi – 110 044

…Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received vide letter No.L-11012/29/2017-IR(CM-I) dated 04.07.2017 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial disputes, terms of which are as under:

920 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

"Whether the employment of the workman Shri Gajraj Singh S/o Shri Raja Ram in M/s GMR Energy Ltd. through M/s Quess Corp. Ltd. has been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiable and if yes, what relief is he entitled to and what directions are necessary in this respect? ''

2. In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the party/ies raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, Shri Gajraj Singh, the workman, opted not to file his claim statement with the Tribunal.

3. Further, on receipt of the above reference, notice was also sent to the workman as well as the management. Neither the postal article, referred above, was received back undelivered nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained affected during the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above notice was served upon the workman. Despite service of the notice, the workman opted to abstain from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.

4. Since the workman has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against the management, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a 'No Dispute/Claim' award. However, it will not debar Shri Gajraj Singh, the workman from seeking relief afresh as there is no adjudication of the reference on merits. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

Dated : February 1, 2019

A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 291&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ,;j bafM;k lsV ,vjiksVZ lfoZl izkbosV fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 1] fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 117@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 14-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&11012@09@2016&vkbZvkj ¼lh ,e&I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2019

S.O. 291.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.1, New Delhi (Ref. No. 117/2016) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Air India Sats Airport Services Pvt. Ltd., and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14.02.2019.

[No. L-11012/09/2016-IR(CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA

COURTS COMPLEX : NEW DELHI

ID No. 117/2016

Ravinder Dutta, S/o. Shri Sudershan Dutta, R/o. H.No.WZ-27B (12-B), Sant Nagar, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi 110018

…Workman/Claimant

Versus

Air India Sats Airport Services Pvt. Ltd. Through its Vice President Office at A-63 AGI Airport, NH-8 Mahipalpur, New Delhi 110037.

… Management/Respondent921 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

AWARD

This Award shall decide a reference which was made by the Appropriate Government vide its letter No. L-11012/09/2016-IR(CM-1) dated 03.05.2016 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:

'Whether the termination from services of Shri Ravinder Dutt by the management of M/s. Air India Sats Airport Services Limited on the basis of an exparte disciplinary proceeding is just and fair ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to along with the compensation for his injury on duty.'

2. Both parties were put to notice and the claimant., Shri Ravinder Dutta filed his statement of claim, with the averments that he was appointed by the Management on contractual basis as Equipment Operator on 22/6/2010 on monthly salary of Rs.11000/- which was increased from time to time on the basis of his performance. His last drawn wages/salary was Rs.15270?- per month as on 11/9/2015 when his services were illegally terminated by the Management after he had met with an accident on 22/2/2015, sustaining injuries on his left leg and remained on medical treatment upto 18/8/2015. However, on 11/9/2015 when he went to join his duties, he was not allowed to do so and thereafter he approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail. The workman is still unemployed since after the date of his termination. He has prayed for reinstatement into service with full back wages and continuity of services & other consequential benefits.

3. Management resisted the claim of the Workman, by filing its written reply and took preliminary objections that the claimant was engaged on fixed term contract dated 22/6/2010 for a period of three years and his services were further extended w.e.f. 21/6/2013 for a period of three years; that after the injury, the claimant had rejoined his services on 20/8/2015 but there were complaints against the claimant of misusing of authority, dishonestly making attendance of other employees etc. and vide letter dated 11/9/2015 the claimant was suspended. Thereafter a proper charge sheet dated 14/9/2015 was served upon but he failed to file his reply/explanation to the charge sheet and never made any representation before the Inquiry Committee and hence he was proceeded ex parte in the disciplinary enquiry proceedings. On the basis of recommendations of the Enquiry Committee, the claimant was removed from services by the Management as the claimant had also failed to file any reply to the show cause notice issued by the Management prior to imposing penalty upon the claimant. The claimant is guilty of suppressing all these facts. Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.

4. The Management filed on record documents/record pertaining to domestic enquiry. However, the claimant opted not to participate in the proceedings. Perusal of the record shows that the claimant did not appear before the Tribunal from 30/11/2017 onwards despite the fact that matter was adjourned time & again and ultimately vide order dated 9/10/2018 this Tribunal was constrained to reserve the matter for passing No Claim/Dispute Award. None appeared on behalf of the claimant for the last five dates of hearing. He even did not enter the witness box either to substantiate the averments made in the claim petition or to rebut the case of the Management that his services were terminated after conducting domestic enquiry wherein he did not participate and was proceeded ex parte.

7. In view of the fact that the claimant has failed to substantiate the averments made in the claim petition regarding illegal termination by the Management, this Tribunal is constrained to pass No Dispute Award in the matter. Since the matter has not been decided on merits, there will be no bar for the claimant to file afresh claim petition in accordance with law for adjudication of the controversy in issue or to seek any other relief to which he is otherwise entitled to. Award is passed accordingly.

Dated :1.2.2019

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 292-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ QwM dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 17/2018½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22011@40@2017&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 292.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 17/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13.02.2019.

[No. L-22011/40/2017-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer922 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID. No. 17 of 2018

Shri. Shashikant, S/o Sri Bholi, R/o –Vill Railway Colony, P.O.-Ward No.8, Supaul, Distt.Supaul-Bihar

Versus

The General Manager, (Region), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, At -2nd Floor, APS Oberoi Tower, Byepass Road, Near Kargi Chowk, Dehradun.

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification no. L-22011/40/2017-IR (CM-II) dated 29.01.2018 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the management of FCI is justified in terminating the service of Sri Shashikant without following the provisions of law? If not, what specific relief and benefit should be given by the FCI management or to reinstate the workman with specific benefit?"

2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated 20.02.2018 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 13.04.2018. On behalf of the management Advocate Mrs. Neeta Mathur appeared and filed her authority in the case and likewise Sri Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Labour Law Advisor, also filed his authority on behalf of the workman.

3. Thereafter again the case was taken up for hearing on 13.06.2018, 08.08.2018, 10.10.18, 15.11.18 and 18.01.2019 was fixed in the case but on the above dates neither the workman nor his authorized representative appeared before the Tribunal nor filed any statement of claim, then notice was ordered to be issued once again to the workman whereupon another notice dated 22.01.19 was issued to the workman fixing 04.02.19 for filing the claim petition by workman. All the above notices were issued to the workman through registered post by this tribunal.

4. On 04.02.2019 when the case was taken up for hearing, management representative is present but worker and his representative are found absent and no statement of claim was filed by the workman in support of his claim.

5. Therefore from the above facts and circumstances of the case it is absolutely evident that the workman is not interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case worker has been given sufficient opportunities to present his claim petition in the case but after availing the entire opportunities worker deliberately and willingly failed in discharging his legal obligation in filing claim petition on his behalf before the tribunal. Therefore it appears that neither the union nor the worker is interested in prosecuting their claim.

6. From the above it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleading has been filed nor has documentary evidence been filed on behalf of the union/worker. Likewise is the position from other side. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence, therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union /worker is not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

7. Reference is answered as above.

Date : 04.02.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 293&-vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ QwM dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 24/2018½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22011@32@2017&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh923 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 293.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13.02.2019.

[No. L-22011/32/2017-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

Before Shri Rakesh Kumar, HJS, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal–cum-Labor Court,

Kanpur

ID. No. 24 of 2018

Shri. Suresh Mahto, S/o Sri Dhutharu, R/o Vill-Kherka Telwa, P.O. & Thana Nauhatta, District Saharsa. Bihar.

Versus

The General Manager, (Region), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, At -2nd Floor, APS Oberoi Tower, Byepass Road, Near Kargi Chowk, Dehradun.

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification no. L-22011/32/2017-IR (CM-II) dated 31.01.2018 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the management of FCI is justified in terminating the service of Sri Suresh Mahto, Ancillary Labour, w.e.f.18.09.12 without following the provisions of law? If not, what specific relief and benefit should be given by the FCI management or to reinstate the workman with specific benefit?"

2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated 22.02.2018 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 27.06.2018. but since Presiding Officer was on tour, case was adjourned to 13.06.19. On behalf of the management Smt. Neeta Mathur, Advocate, appeared on behalf of management and filed her authority in the case and likewise Sri Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Labour Law Advisor, also filed his authority on behalf of the workman.

3. Thereafter again the case was taken up for hearing on 08.08.2018, 10.10.18, 15.11.18 and 18.01.2019, but on the above date neither the workman nor his authorized representative appeared before the Tribunal nor filed any statement of claim then notice was ordered to be issued once again to the workman whereupon another notice dated 22.01.19 was issued to the workman fixing 04.02.19 for filing the claim petition by workman. All the above notices were issued to the workman through registered post by this tribunal.

4. On 04.02.2019 when the case was taken up for hearing management representative was present but worker and his representative were found absent and no statement of claim was filed by the workman in support of his claim.

5. Therefore, from the above facts and circumstances of the case it is absolutely evident that the workman is not interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case worker has been given sufficient opportunities to present his claim petition in the case but after availing the entire opportunities worker deliberately and willingly failed in discharging his legal obligation in filing claim petition on his behalf before the tribunal. Therefore it appears that neither the union nor the worker is interested in prosecuting their claim.

6. From the above it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleading has been filed nor has documentary evidence been filed on behalf of the union/worker. Likewise is the position from other side. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union /worker is not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

7. Reference is answered as above.

Date : 05.02.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer924 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 294-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ QwM dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 26/2018½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22011@38@2017&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 294.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 26/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Food Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13.02.2019.

[No. L-22011/38/2017-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID. No. 26 of 2018

Shri Rameshwar Paswan, S/o Sri Ramprit Paswan, R/o Vill. Masaudhi Diha, Thana & Post Masaudhi, District –Patna, Bihar

Versus

The General Manager, (Region), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, At -2nd Floor, APS Oberoi Tower, Byepass Road, Near Kargi Chowk, Dehradun.

Award

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification no. L-22011/38/2017-IR (CM-II) dated 31.01.2018 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the management of FCI is justified in terminating the service of Sri Rameshwar Paswan, Handling Labour, w.e.f.18.09.12 without following the provisions of law? If not, what specific relief and benefit should be given by the FCI management or to reinstate the workman with specific benefit?"

925 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

6. From the above it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleading has been filed nor has documentary evidence been filed on behalf of the union/worker. Likewise is the position from other side. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union /worker is not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

7. Reference is answered as above.

Date : 06.02.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 295-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ फ़ू ड कारपोरेशन ऑफ़ इंिडया ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 31/2018½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22011@37@2017&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 295.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Food Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13.02.2019.

[No. L-22011/37/2017-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID. No. 31 of 2018

Shri Nand Kumar Prasad, S/o Sri Shatrudhan Thakur, R/o Vill & P.O. Rakiya, District Saharsa. Bihar.

Versus

The General Manager, (Region), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, At -2nd Floor, APS Oberoi Tower, Byepass Road, Near Kargi Chowk, Dehradun.

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification no. L-22011/37/2017-IR (CM-II) dated 31.01.2018 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the management of FCI is justified in terminating the service of Sri Nand Kumar Prasad, Anciliary Labour, w.e.f.18.09.12 without following the provisions of law? If not, what specific relief and benefit should be given by the FCI management or to reinstate the workman with specific benefit?"926 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated 27.02.2018 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 27.04.2018. but since Presiding Officer was on tour, case was adjourned to 13.06.18. On behalf of the management Smt. Neeta Mathur, Advocate, appeared and filed her authority in the case and likewise Sri Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Labour Law Advisor, also filed his authority on behalf of the workman.

5. Therefore, from the above facts and circumstances of the case it is absolutely evident that the workman is not interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case worker has been given sufficient opportunities to present his claim petition but after availing the entire opportunities worker deliberately and willingly failed in discharging his legal obligation in filing claim petition on his behalf before the tribunal. Therefore, it appears the worker is not interested in prosecuting his claim.

6. From the above it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleading has been filed nor has documentary evidence been filed on behalf of the union/worker. Likewise is the position from other side. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union/worker is not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

7. Reference is answered as above.

Date : 07.02.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 296-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ फ़ू ड कारपोरेशन ऑफ़ इंिडया ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] कोलकkता ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 02/2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@111@2004&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 296.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 02/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Kolkata, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/111/2004-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer927 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

ANNEXURE

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. NT-02 of 2005

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India

AND

Their workmen

Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the Management : Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal, Ld. Counsel

On behalf of the Workmen : Mr. Madhusudan Dutta, Ld. Counsel for FCI Workers Union

Mr. Tridib Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for FCI Handling Workers Union

State: West Bengal Industry: Food & Public Distribution

Dated: 24th January, 2019

AWARD

By Order No.L-22012/11/2004-IR(C-II) dated 24.12.2004 and subsequent order of even number dated 10.01.2014 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 7B read with Section 10(1A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this National Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in issuing Circular No.7/2002 dated

4.4.2002 changing the working hours of departmental and DPS Handling workers from 6 ½ hours to 7 hours is

legaland justified? If not, what relief they are entitled and from which date?"

2. Brief facts as depicted from the statement of claim of the union are the duties of the staff employed at the various depots is mainly clerical, technical or supervisory in nature, hence duty hours has been fixed for six and half hours in one shift per day. The union has represented FCI to reduce the working hours of handling workers to six and half hours by entering into a settlement with the union as the handling workers were working eight hours in a shift. A dispute was raised by the union with regard to handling workers in the State of U.P. and Union Territory of Delhi which was referred to CGIT, Kolkata as Reference No. 05 of 1990 in which a joint petition of compromise had been filed and the Tribunal passed an Award dated 17.07.1990 in terms of the said compromise and the duty hours of handling workers was reduced to six and half hours as negotiated in the settlement dated 06.06.1990. But the FCI by circular No. 11 of 2000 dated 28.09.2000 declared that the wage structure application to FCI departmental workers working in inland depots would be revised on the basis of settlement dated 02.08.2000. In clause 14.4 of the circular the FCI with its mala fide intention increased the working hours of departmental labourers as a condition for granting the wage revision. In view of above paragraph of circular dated 28.09.2000 the working hours of departmental and DPS workers was increased to seven hours instead of six and half hours as fixed earlier. It has been pleaded that the increase in working hours amounts to change in terms and condition of service of the handling workers which was done without any prior notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, it is illegal and void. The right of the handling workers to have only six and half hours of work in daily shift was fixed through a settlement/award, therefore, binding upon the parties.

3. In reply to the statement of claim of the union, FCI filed its written statement denying the stand of the union and pleaded that the duty hours of clerical staff working at the inland depots of FCI were fixed in accordance with the provisions of Shops & Establishments Act of the states concerned which was six and half hours a day whereas duties of departmental labourers were eight hours a day. As the union has demanded and was granted parity in the working hours of departmental labourers and clerical staff working in depots, it was agreed that the working hours of departmental labourers would be increased consequent upon an increase in the working hours of clerical staff of the depots so that the parity could be maintained. It does not amount to change in condition of service of any departmental labourers, but it was implemented to give effect to the condition of service that their working hours should be at par with the clerical staff at depots and therefore, no notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was required.

4. Union filed rejoinder against the pleadings put forth by the FCI in its written statement.

5. On behalf of the unions affidavit of Shri Harikant Sharma and Shri Dulal Nath were filed. However, at the stage of cross-examination, the witnesses were not produced instead both the unions representing the cause of handling workers and labourers moved applications to the effect that by efflux of time the dispute referred for adjudication has lost its relevance and at present no dispute in the matter of working hours of workers exists.

6. In view of above, there exists no dispute between the parties and consequently no adjudication is possible.

7. Award is passed accordingly.

Dated, Kolkata, The 24th January, 2019

JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer928 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 297&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj मैसस(cid:28) कोल इंिडया िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] कोलकkता ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 45/2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@103@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 297.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 45/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Kolkata, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Coal India Limited and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 13.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/103/2013-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 45 of 2013

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Coal India Limitred

AND

Their workmen

Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the   Management    :        Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal, learned counsel
On behalf of the  Workmen        :        None
                                          Industry: Coal                           Dated: 24th January, 2019

AWARD

By Order No. L-22012/103/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 18.09.2013 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether demand of Coal India Limited Contractors 'Workers' Union to regularize the service Smt. Tania

Mitra, on completion of her training on 29.05.2004, in the post of Data Entry Operator as has been considered

in case of Smt. Krishna Nag, because of her higher qualification, as per norms of NCWA-VI, is legal and/or

justified? If not, to what relief Smt. Mitra is entitled to?"

2. Brief facts in the background of which this reference has been made by the Central Government to this Tribunal are that the workman Smt. Tania Mitra was appointed in Coal India Ltd. on 29th May, 2003 under clause 9.4.2 and 9.4.3 of NCWA-IV as Category-I (Trainee) and placed under System Department. It is further pleaded by the workman that the instruction No. 29 of NCWA-IV provides for employment of one dependant of the worker who dies within service. It is also provided that matriculates will be appointed as Trainee for different trades keeping in view of the man power, educational qualification and aptitude of the incumbent. The training will be for a period of one year during which the appointee will be placed in Category-I. After successful completion of training they will be placed in regular category. The concerned workman was considered and placed in System Department because of her knowledge of computer application and bachelor's degree. As per instruction No. 29 of NCWA-IV after successful completion of training for a period of one year, the workman concerned was supposed to be placed in regular category/scale of pay, but in case of the concerned workman the concerned authorities did not obey codified norms framed under instruction 29 of NCWA-IV. The Category-I post in which the concerned workman was placed, is for unskilled labour only. The employment of the workman concerned was in view of death of her father while her deceased father was in employment holding executive post. Clause 3.5 of the certified Standing Orders provides that where a workman who has satisfactorily put in six months' continuous service on a permanent post as a probationer would become permanent workman, but unfortunately such stipulation was ignored in case of the concerned workman and even after the expiry of probation period on 13th July, 2004 she was not placed properly according to certified Standing Orders. The workman concerned made929 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 several representations praying for promotion in higher grade since she was working in Category-I. Her representation dated 22nd June, 2009 addressed to the Chief General Manager (MP&IR) was also forwarded by him recommending her posting on the post of Junior Data Entry Operator. The justification of the workman concerned to have post of Junior Data Entry Operator as per her educational qualification and experience in computer operation was also admitted by the General Manager (System) of the company. The guidelines formulated by JBCCI was not followed in case of appointment of the concerned workman whereas full benefit of above guidelines was extended to Smt. Krishna Nag who is presently holding the post of Senior Data Entry Operator while the workman concerned remained in Category-I as daily rated mazdoor. Thus it is pleaded that the legitimate posting at the level of Junior Data Entry Operator in T & S Grade-E have been denied to the workman. Chief General Manager (System) in his letter has noted that the workman concerned was engaged in data entry job since May, 2003 and as per paragraph 3.5 of the Standing Orders even after completion of six months' satisfactory service, the workman has been deprived of her right to get enhanced grade. He has also noted that there is no Trainee in Category-I or grade in system cadre system. Thus the concerned workman has claimed her regularization on completion of her training on 29th May, 2004 on the post of Data Entry Operator with all kinds of financial and other service benefits.

3. No written statement has been filed on behalf of the management, though the company has put in appearance in the case and its counsel was also present. Therefore, the case proceeded exparte against the management and exparte evidence was taken.

4. On behalf of the workman concerned WW-01, Shri Rama Prasad Biswas, President of the union and WW-02, Smt. Tania Mitra have been examined. Apart from this, several documentary evidence have also been filed by the workman which shall be referred at the appropriate place.

5. Though the union and the workman concerned have adduced evidence, but they did not appear to argue the case. Only the leaned counsel for the management was present on the day of argument. However, no argument was advanced by him also.

6. The workman concerned has alleged that even after completion of six months' satisfactory continuous period of probation she was not placed properly in regular category and in total violation of certified Standing Orders, she was placed in Category-I which is a post of unskilled labour. It has been further pleaded that according to note sheet of Chief General Manager (System) there is no Trainee Category-I discipline or grade in systems cadre scheme. It has been further mentioned in the note of Chief General Manager (System) that the lowest entry level is Junior Data Entry Operator Trainee in T & S Grade-E. It has been further alleged that the above certified Standing Orders was followed in case of Smt. Krishna Nag and full benefit was extended to her, but similarly placed the workman concerned was deprived of the same benefit. Thus discrimination in two similarly placed persons has also been raised. All these facts have remained uncontroverted in absence of any written statement by Coal India Ltd. The evidence adduced by the workman concerned has also remained uncontroverted. Therefore, there is no reason to disbelieve the contention of the workman concerned.

7. Joint Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry dated 27th September, 1991 has also been placed on record which shows that educated new appointees under clause 9.4.2 and 9.4.3 of NCWA-IV and under land looser scheme who are matriculates will be placed under training for a period of one year during which period they will be placed in Category-I and after successful completion of training, they will be placed in regular category/scale of pay of the job. It is not denied that the workman concerned is holding bachelor's degree with special knowledge of application of computer. It is also not denied that she completed her one year training successfully and continuously, but after completion of training instead of placing her in regular category she was placed in Category-I Trainee in System Department which was non existing post. From the note forwarded by Chief General Manager (System) it is clear that there is no Category-I discipline or grade in systems cadre scheme. The lowest entry level is Junior Data Entry Operator Trainee. Thus it is established that in utter disregard of Clause 5.3 of certified Standing Orders she was placed in Category-I which is a post of unskilled labour which is clearly a case of discrimination and deprivation of legitimate right of the workman concerned. I have no hesitation to say that the management had adopted unfair labour practice in case of the workman concerned. Hence she deserves regularization from the date when she completed one year continuous successful period of probation. She is entitled for regularization to the post of Junior Data Entry Operator with effect from 29th May, 2004 with all consequential benefits, as she has been working under System Department since then.

8. The reference is answered in the affirmative and the Award is passed accordingly.

Dated, Kolkata,

The 24th January, 2019

JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer930 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk vk-298-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj e/; jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 81@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41011@23@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 298.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of North Central Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.02.2019.

[No. L-41011/23/2016– IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL –CUM-LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

ID. No. 81 of 2017

Sh. S.N. Srivastava, General Secretary, Rail Sevak Sangh J-422, Indralok Colony (Near Traffic Training Park) Kanpur Road, Lucknow-226023

Versus

The D.R.M North Central Railway, Allahabad.

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification no. L-41011/23/2016-IR (B-I) dated 26.10.2017 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the workman Shri Ajay Verma (retired) Mail Guard is entitle for promotional post in the hierarchy (Promotional Hierarchy) i.e Rs 46,00/-& 54,00/- in P.B 3 w.e.f 01.09.2018 and is he entitled for 2nd & 3rd financial up-gradation (MACP) in Promotional Hierarchy along with all consequential benefit with 12% interest or not? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?"

2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notice dated 24.11.2017 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 29.12.2017. On behalf of the management Advocate Neeta Mathur appeared and filed her authority in the case but none appeared for the workman nor was any claim filed on his behalf. Again the case was taken up on 28.02.2018, 17.05.2018 and on 13.07.2018 but again on the above dates neither the workman appeared before the Tribunal nor filed any statement of claim. On 06.09.2018 the Court was vacant still none appeared on behalf of the worker.

3. On 29.11.2018 when the case was taken up for hearing both parties were absent and as no statement of claim was filed by workman again registered notice to the workman/union was issued fixing 09.01.2019 for filing claim petition by the workman/union. The said notice was issued by this Tribunal through registered post to the union/worker for filing claim statement.

4. Again on 09.01.2019 when the case was taken up for hearing none appeared from the side of the union nor any claim petition was filed in the case.

5. Therefore from the above facts and circumstances of the case it is absolutely clear that neither the union espousing the cause of the workman nor the workman himself are interested in prosecuting the present case. Union have been given sufficient opportunities to present their claim petition in the case but after availing all the opportunities union failed in discharging their obligation. Therefore it appears that neither the union nor the worker is interested in prosecuting their claim.

931 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

7. Reference is answered as above.

Date : 11.01.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 299-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj e/; jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 06@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41012@05@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 299.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 06/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of North Central Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.02.2019.

[No. L-41012/05/2016–IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR

ID. No. 06 of 2017

Sh. Ram Babu son of late Dhunni, C/o Sri R N Awasthi, General Secretary, UTUC, 130-E, Barra-4, Kanpur

Versus

The D.R.M North Central Railway, Nawab Yusuf Road, Allahabad

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification no. L-41012/05/2016-IR (B-I) dated 08.02.2017 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of North Central Railway in imposing the punishment of removal from the services on Sri Ram Babu son of late Dhunni, workman, vide order dated 06.11.07 is just fair & legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to? "

2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notice dated 28.04.2017 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 26.05.2017. On behalf of the management Sri Mragank Kumar Srivastava, Advocate appeared and filed his authority in the case but none appeared for the workman nor was any claim filed on his behalf. Again the case was taken up on 27.07.2017, 3.10.17, 29.11.17, 31.01.18, 12.04.18, 07.06.18, 13.07.18, 06.09.18, and on 29.11.18 but again on the above dates neither the workman appeared before the Tribunal nor filed any statement of claim. It is pertinent to mention here that again a registered notice was issued to the parties calling upon the worker to file his claim petition by 09.01.18, but neither he appeared before the tribunal on the date fixed nor filed any claim petition in support of his claim.

932 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. On 09.01.2019 when the case was taken up for hearing, representative for the management was present but the worker was absent and no statement of claim was filed by workman.

4. Therefore from the facts and circumstances of the case it is absolutely clear that neither the union espousing the cause of the workman nor the workman himself are interested in prosecuting the present case. Union have been given sufficient opportunities to present their claim petition in the case but after availing all the opportunities union failed in discharging their obligation. Therefore it appears that neither the union nor the worker is interested in prosecuting their claim.

5. From the above it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleading has been filed nor has documentary evidence been filed on behalf of the union/worker. Likewise is the position from other side. As such it is a case of no pleading and no evidence, therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union /worker is not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

6. Reference is answered as above.

Date : 11.01.19

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 300-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj if'pe jsyos ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 1102@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41011@27@98&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 300.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1102/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.02.2019.

[No. L-41011/27/98– IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 24th January, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1102/2004

1. The Chief Project Manager (Construction), Western Railway, B.G. Station Building, 2nd Floor, PO – Railwaypura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380002

2. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction), Western Railway, Divisional Office, Kothi Compound, Rajkot (Gujarat) - 360001

…First Parties

V/s

The General Secretary, Western Railway Kamdar Sangh, T.B.Z. – 17, Gurunagar, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat) – 370201

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri H.R. Raval For the Second Party : Union Representative933 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/27/98–IR(B-I) dated 11.03.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of Western Railway Kamdar Sangh, Gandhidahm against the management of Chief Project Manager (Construction), Western Railway, Ahmedabad for temporary status to Shri Chittambaran P., workman w.e.f. 08.12.1980 is just, valid and legal? If so, to what benefits, the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?"

1. The reference dates back to 11.03.1999 and received on 16.03.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing of notice to the parties, the second party workman Chittambaran P. submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 alleging that he was appointed as causal labour under the Permanent Way Inspector (Construction), Rajkot on 08.12.1979. He worked their till 10.02.1980. Thereafter, he was transferred from Permanent Way Inspector (Construction), Rajkot, to Permanent Way Inspector (Construction), Jamnagar. There he worked from 10.02.1980 to 10.03.1981. After completion of the Viramgam Okha Rail Project, he was retrenched without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has further alleged that he orally and through union, requested to the authorities to reinstate him but to no result. Therefore, he raised the dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Khadipur. The dispute was referred to Central Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad vide Reference (ITC) No. 27/1991. The Tribunal in the said reference ordered to take him back on duty with back wages, therefore, he was taken back on duty vide Dy. CE(C)II ADI Letter No. ADI/E/615/11 of 09.10.1996 and CPM-I-ADI Letter No. ADI/E/524/1 Vol. II/OA No. 231/1994 of 27.09.1996. He has further alleged that under the existing provisions of Railway Board orders, he was required to be granted temporary status on completion of 365 days of service with effect from 08.12.1980 but the said temporary status was not granted despite representations made by the workman as well as the union, therefore, he again raised the dispute which resulted into this reference. Thus he has prayed for grant of temporary status with effect from 08.12.1980 along with consequential benefits.

3. The first parties The Chief Project Manager (Construction), Western Railway, B.G. Station Building, 2nd Floor, PO – Railwaypura, Ahmedabad and The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction), Western Railway, Divisional Office, Kothi Compound, Rajkot, jointly submitted the written statement Ex. 4 submitting that the reference is bad in law and non- maintainable and deserves to be rejected. The workman was appointed as casual labour on 08.12.1979 under the Railway Rules and Regulations. He was also given temporary status with effect from 01.01.1983 following the judgement of the apex court in the matter of Inderpal Yadav V/s union of India and others. The judgement provides that those casual labours who completed 360 days but less than 3 years of service as on 01.01.1981 were to be granted temporary status w.e.f. 01.01.1983. Therefore, the demand of the union as well as the workman regarding granting of temporary status w.e.f. 08.12.1980 is baseless and without any substance. Therefore, the reference is liable to be dismissed.

4. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

i. Whether the demand of Western Railway Kamdar Sangh, Gandhidham against the management of Chief Project Manager (Construction), Western Railway, Ahmedabad for temporary status to Shri Chittambaran P., workman w.e.f. 08.12.1980 is just, valid and legal?

ii. To what relief, if any, the concerned workman is entitled?

5. Issue No. i and ii: As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The burden of proof of these issues lies on the second party workman who submitted his affidavit Ex. 8 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim and he has not stated anything contrary in his cross-examination.

6. The basis issue in the matter is that whether the workman is entitled for temporary status w.e.f. 08.12.1980. While the first party in his written statement has stated that the workman was appointed on casual labour on 08.12.1979 under the Railway Rules and Regulations. He was also given temporary status with effect from 01.01.1983 following the judgement of the apex court in the matter of Inderpal Yadav V/s union of India and others. The judgement provides that those casual labours who completed 360 days but less than 3 years of service as on 01.01.1981 were to be granted temporary status w.e.f. 01.01.1983. Therefore, the demand of the union as well as the workman regarding granting of temporary status w.e.f. 08.12.1980 is baseless and without any substance. But the second party workman has not rebutted the aforesaid contention of the first party by filing a rejoinder against the written statement filed by the first party and secondly, he has not explained as to why the permanent status ought to be given from 08.12.1980. Therefore, the reference is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed.

7. Thus the reference is dismissed as being not maintainable in the light of the reasons given in Para No. 6.

8. The award is passed accordingly.

P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer934 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYYkh] 19 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 301-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vgenkckn edsZaVkby dks&vkWijsfVo cSad fy- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 357@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 19-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@374@2000&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2019

S.O. 301.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 357/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Ahmedabad Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd . and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19.02.2019.

[ No. L-12012/374/2000– IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st January, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 357/2004

The General Manager, Ahmedabad Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., AMCO House, Near Stadium Circle, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001

…First Party

V/s

Shri Shirish C. Mehta, C/o Akhil Gujarat Bank Karmachari Union, Pattarkuwa, Relief Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) -380001

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri Bhargav M. Joshi For the Second Party : Shri P.C. Chaudhary

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/374/2000–IR (B-I) dated 28.11.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether Shri Shirish C. Mehta, designated Manager in the Recovery Department of the Ahmedabad Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., is 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act?" If so,

"Whether the action of the management of Ahmedabad Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Shirish C. Mehta w.e.f. 20.05.2000 is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

1. The reference dates back to 28.11.2000 and received on 12.12.2000 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to both the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 15.04.2001 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 5 on 25.05.2001. Since then the second party workman has not been leading evidence and his advocate Shri P.C. Chaudhary vide application Ex. 18 informed the Tribunal with annexure Ex. 19 indicating that he wrote a letter to the second party workman by registered post on 08.09.2016 informing him to appear for leading his evidence but the said postal envelope enclosed with the application indicates that the envelope and935 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 acknowledgment received back as un-served. Thus the advocate for the second party expressed his inability to lead evidence.

3. Therefore, it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the reference.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Ahmedabad Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Shirish C. Mehta w.e.f. 20.05.2000 is legal, proper and justified."

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 20 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 302-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj MsfMdsVsM ÝsV dkWfjMksj dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k fy- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] vtesj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 05@17½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41012@106@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2019

S.O. 302.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 05/17) of the .Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ajmer as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No .L-41012/106/2016-IR(B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

vuqca/k

Je U;k;ky; ,oa vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] vtesj

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh&Jh ,l-,u-Vsyj] vkj-,p-ts-,l

izdj.k la[;k& lh-vkbZ Vh-vkj- 05@17

lh vkbZ ,l ua-,lvkbZVhvkj&26@17

jsQjsal la[;k & ,y-&41012@106@2016& vkbZ vkj ¼ch&1½ fnukad 08-6-2017

Jh eksguflag iq= Jh ghjkflag xzke o iksLV ek;kiqj] ok;k jktx< ftyk vtesj ---izkFkhZ

cuke

1- nh phQ izkstsDV eSustj] MsfMdsVsM ÝsV dkWfjMksj dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k fy- ,&2 ljD;wyj jksM th vkj ih ,l ih vkWfQl ds ikl] vtesj ¼jkt-½

2- Jh izsepan 'kekZ] jsYkos dkaVªSDVj ,aM lfoZl izksokbZMj] lh&28]

cjdr uxj foLrkj] vtqZu uxj QkVd ds ikl] Vksad QkVd] t;iqj ---vizkFkhZx.k

mifLFkfr

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % Jh lehj dkys] vf/koDrk A vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ugh A

vokMZ

fnukad 24-5-2018

1- Je foHkkx] dsanz ljdkj }kjk bl vf/kdj.k ds vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ fuEu jsQjsal la-,y-&41012@106@2016&vkbZ vkj ¼ch&1½ fnukad 08-6-2017 dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS%&936 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Premchand Sharma, Railway Contractor and Service

Provider, Jaipur and Chief Project Manager, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India

Ltd.Ajmer in terminating the service of Sh.Mohan Singh S/o Sh. Hira Singh w.e.f.09-4-2016 is legal and

justified? If not, then to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ?''

2- jsQjsal izkIr gksus ij izkFkhZ dks uksfVl fn;s tkus ij is'kh fn- 21-8-17 dks izkFkhZ us tfj;s vf/koDrk mifLFkr gksdj odkyrukek is'k fd;k ,oa Dyse o nLrkost is'k djus dks le; pkgk A ftl i'pkr~ is'kh fn-10-10-17 dks iqu% volj pkgk x;k ftl ij fn-20-11-17 dh is'kh fu;r dh x;h A mDr is'kh dks Hkh izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse nLrkost is'k djus dks volj pkgk x;k ftl ij mls vafre volj fn;k x;k rFkk vxyh is'kh fn-18-112-17 dks iqu% volj pkgus ij U;k;fgr esa ,d volj vkSj fn;k x;k rRi'pkr~ fn-12-2-18 dks Hkh izkFkhZ dh vksj ls iqu% volj pkgus ij lkS :i;s ds gtsZ ij iqu% volj fn;k x;k A rRi'pkr~ is'kh fn- 16-4-18 dks Hkh iqu% volj pkgus ij nks lkS :i;s ds gtsZ ij volj fn;k x;k A rRi'pkr~ is'kh fn- 8-5-18 dks iqu% volj pkgus ij U;k;ky; }kjk vknsf'kr fd;k x;k fd vanj ;kse ianzg fnol izkFkhZ }kjk LVsVSesaV vWkQ Dyse o nLrkost is'k ugh djus ij dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugh jguk ekuk tkdj vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k tkosxk A ftl i'pkr~ is'kh fn-22-5-18 ,oa vkt is'kh ij Hkh izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse is'k ughs fd;k x;k A

3- izkFkhZ vf/koDrk dks lquk x;k A ftUgksusa iqu% LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse izLrqr djus dk volj pkgk A fadarq gekjs fouez er esa izkFkhZ dks LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse o nLrkost is'k djus gsrq vusdkusd volj fn;s tk pqds gS A izdj.k fn- 13-7-17 dks ntZ fd;k x;k Fkk rc ls djhc lkr isf'k;kWa fudy tkus ds ckn Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse is'k ughs fd;k x;k ftlls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ vius vf/kdkjksa ds izfr tkx:d ugh gS ,oa vius izdj.k ds izfr xaHkhj ugh gS ,oa mldk dkbZ fookn 'ks"k ugh jgk gS A ifj.kkeLo:i izdj.k esa izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse o nLrkost is'k fd;s tkus dk volj can fd;s tkrs gq, izdj.k esa dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugh vokMZ ikfjr fd;k tkuk U;k;laxr gS A

vkns'k

5- vokMZ fy[kk;k tkdj vkt fnukad 24-5-2018 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa gLrk{kj dj lquk;k x;kA vokMZ dh izfr fu;ekuqlkj dsanz ljdkj dks okLrs xtV esa izdk'ku izsf"kr dh tkos A

,l ,u Vsyj] U;k;k/kh'k

ubZ fnYyh] 20 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 303-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj t;iqj Fkkj xzkeh.k cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] vtesj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 04@14½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@18@2009&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½] Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2019

S.O. 303.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 04/14) of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ajmer as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-12012/18/2009-IR(B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

937 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

vuqca/k

Je U;k;ky; ,oa vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] vtesj

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh&Jh ,l-,u- Vsyj] vkj-,p-ts-,l-

izdj.k la[;k&lh-vkbZ-Vh-vkj- 04@14 ¼04@09½

jsQjsal la[;k&,y-12012@18@2009-vkbZ vkj ¼ch&1½ fnukad 07-07-2009

Jh nsohyky fnokdj iq= Jh iUukyky ckads fcgkjh dqat ih,pbZMh DokVZlZ ds lkeus]

xka/khuxj] enuxat] vtesj ¼jkt-½

---izkFkhZ

cuke

1- v/;{k] t;iqj Fkkj xzkeh.k cSad] lh&Ldhe] t;iqj]

2- tujy eSustj] t;iqj Fkkj xzkeh.k cSad] ljnkj iVsy ekxZ] t;iqj]

3- izca/kd] t;iqj Fkkj xzkeh.k cSad czkap eykj ftyk tks/kiqj

---vizkFkhZx.k

mifLFkfr

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % Jh dq.kky jkor] vf/koDrkA

vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls % Jh iquhr esgjk] vf/koDrkA

vf/kfu.kZ;

fnukad 11-9-2018

1- Je foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je ea=ky; }kjk bl vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k ds vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ fuEu jsQjsal funsZf'kr fd;k x;k gS%&

2- ^^Whether the action of the management of Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank in dismissing Sri Devi Llal Divakar S/o Sri Pannalal from services vide order dated 28-9-2005 is justified ? If not, what relief the applicant concerned is entitled ?"

3- izkFkhZ }kjk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse izLrqr dj mlesa vfHkopu fd;s x;s gS fd og fn- 3-7-99 dks vizkFkhZ cSad esa fyfid e; jksdfM;k ds in ij HkrhZ gqvk Fkk mlus yxu o esgur ls dke fd;k fn- 28-9-05 ds vkns'k }kjk mls inP;qr dj fn;k x;k ftlls mDr gLrxr fookn bl vf/kdj.k esa izLrqr gqvk gS A izkFkhZ ij yxk;s x;s vkjksi ftuds vk/kkj ij fd mls lsok ls inP;qr fd;k x;k gS] xyr gS A mlds f[kykQ tkap dk;Zokgh ,drjQk dh x;h gS tks voS/k o 'kwU; gS A ;g tkap Qs;j ugh gS A tkurs&cw>rs ,drjQk dh x;h gS ftlesa lkekU; fu;eksa dh ikyuk ugh dh x;h A izkFkhZ viuh iRuh dh chekjh ds dkj.k ckgj Fkk ftldh ekSf[kd lwpuk cSad dks nh x;h Fkh ftldk Qk;nk mBkdj ds vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZ ds fo:) dh x;h ,drjQk tkap dk;Zokgh izkd`frd fu;eksa ds fo:) gS rFkk Qs;j ,aM izkWij ugh gS A izkFkhZ ds }kjk iqu% tkap dk Hkh fuosnu fd;k x;k ftl ij /;ku ugh fn;k x;k A izkFkhZ ij vkjksi O;fDrxr jaft'ko'k yxk;s x;s gS A izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr voS/k gS A var esa izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr voS/k o 'kwU; ?kksf"kr djrs gq, leLr osru ifjykHkksa lfgr izkFkhZ dks lsok esa iquZLFkkiuk dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A

4- vizkFkhZx.k }kjk mDr LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dk tokc izLrqr dj mls enokj vLohdkjrs gq, vfHkopu fd;s x;s gS fd izkFkhZ dks fu;eksa ds rgr vihy djuh pkfg, Fkh tks ugh dh x;h A izkFkhZ ds ikl oSdfYid mipkj miyC/k gS A izkFkhZ fyfid&jksdfMk in ij fu;qDr Fkk ;g rF; Lohdkj gS fdarq izkFkhZ us dHkh f'kdk;r dk ekSdk ugh fn;k gks ;g xyr gS A mlds dk;Zokgd 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij jgrs /kks[kk/kMh xcu o vHknz O;ogkj ds vkjksi ml ij Fks vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds [kkrk la-2 dk vkgj.k i= :i;s iSarkyhl gtkj dk Lo;a dh gLrfyfi ls rS;kj djuk QthZ gLrk{kj dj Hkqxrku Lo;a izkFkhZ us izkIr dj fy;k A Hkksekjke ds lh lh [kkrk la- 1590 ls cklB gtkj :i;s dk okmpj }kjk Hkqxrku udn izkfIr bR;kfn n'kkZ;k tcfd cklB gtkj :i;s mDr _.kh dks ugh fn;s x;s ,oa mudk izkFkhZ us /kks[kk/kMh dj xcu dj fy;k x;k A j.kNksMjke ds [kkrk la- 1590 lss nsuk n'kkZ;h x;h jde cklB gtkj esa ls iSarhl gtkj dh gh jkf'k dk Hkqxrku mls fd;k x;k o lRrkbZl gtkj :i;s dk Hkqxrku de fd;k x;k A izkFkhZ us fn- 11-1-05 dks 'kk[kk eykj esa vius 'olqj] lkyk] iRuh o vU; O;fDr;ksa ds lkFk ?kqldj 'kk[kk izca/kd lans'kokgd vkfn ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj fd;k vtqZujke dks iSarkyhl gtkj :i;s izkIr gksus dh jlhn dh vuqla/kku drkZ ,e ,y fljoh o 'kk[kk izca/kd ls ekax dhA fofo/k nsunkjh [kkrs ls :i;s iksLVst ds uke ls vukf/kd`r :i ls vfxze izkIr fd;s o nwljs [kkrs esa lek;kstu dj fn;k x;k ,oa 2930@&#i;s dh jkf'k dk /kks[kk&/kMh dj xcu fd;k A mDr vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ dks vkjksi i= dks tkjh fd;k x;k o eykj 'kk[kk ij izkFkhZ ugh vk;k A mlds lkFk miyC/k vafre irksa o uanuxj C;koj o iwfu;kokl esa iathd`r Mkd ls vkjksi i= fHktok;k x;k fdarq938 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] izkFkhZ ds edku [kkyh djds pys tkus o ?kj ij ugh jgus ds fjekdZ ds lkFk Mkd okil ykSV x;h A izkFkhZ ds laidZ foghu gks tkus ij lekpkj i= jktLFkku if=dk 7-8-05 esa lwpuk izdkf'kr dh fadrq izkFkhZ mifLFkr ugh gqvk mlus tkap esa Hkkx ugh fy;k A fn- 16-8-05 dks tkap fu/kkZfjr dh x;h mlesa Hkh og mifLFkr ugh gqvk rks izkFkhZ dks ,d ekSdk vkSj nsrs gq, fn- 26-8-05 dks tkap ,di{kh; dh x;h A ftlesa izkFkhZ ds fo:) vkjksi lkfcr gq,A tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk izLrqr tkap izfrosnu miyC/k lkexzh dk vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk v/;;u fd;k x;k o tkap vf/kdkjh ds fu"d"kksZ ij lgefr nh x;h ,oa Fkkj vkapfyd xzkeh.k cSad ¼vf/kdkjh ,oa deZpkjh½ lsok fofu;e 2000 dh /kkjk 38 ¼2½ ds rgr iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, izkFkhZ dks cSad dh lsok ls inP;qr djus dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;k o fn- 28-9-05 dks vkns'k tkjh fd;k x;k A izkFkhZ ds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dh x;h gS A izkFkhZ us Lo;a us QthZ gLrk{kj djds iSarkyhl gtkj :i;s vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds [kkrs ls fudkyuk Lohdkj fd;k gS A izkFkhZ Lo;a tku&cw>dj ds tkap dk;Zokgh esa mifLFkr ugh gqvk tkap dk;Zokgh esa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk ughs gS o fu;eksa ,oa izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)karksa ds vuqlkj laikfnr dh x;h gS A izkFkhZ ds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds rF; xyr gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkrs gq, uks&fMLIwV vokMZ ikfjr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A mDr tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa mBk;h x;h izkjafHkd vkifRr;ksa dk izkFkhZ }kjk tokcqy tokc Hkh izLrqr dj mUgsa vLohdkj fd;k x;k gS A

5- izdj.k ds nqjkpj.k dh foHkkxh; tkap ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dh inP;qfr ls lacaf/kr gksus ls izdj.k esa vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izkFkhZ ds fo:) laikfnr ?kjsyw tkap ds fu"i{k ,oa fof/k&lEer~ (Fair and Proper)gksus ds iz'u ij cgl lquh tkdj bl U;k;ky; }kjk fn- 22-12-16 dks vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tkdj vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izkFkhZ nsohyky ds fo:) dh x;h mDr foHkkxh; tkap fu"i{k ,oa oS/kkfud (Fair and Proper) gksuk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS A

6- ;gka ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk bl U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fn-22-12-16 dks pqukSrh nsrs gq, viuh ,l ch flfoy fjV fiVh'ku ua- 4463@17 mUokuh nsohyky fnokdj cuke ps;jeSu t;iqj Fkkj xzkeh.k cSad izLrqr dh ftlesa ekuuh; mPp U;k;y; }kjk fn- 11-5-17 dks fuEu vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s gS%&"It is made clear that the presiding officer shall not be prejudiced with the findings which have been taken into consideration at the time of declaring the enquriy as fair. ?The writ petition accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid observations."

7- rRi'pkr~ U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuk i= fn- 8-9-2017 ij vkns'k fn-28-2-18 ikfjr djrs gq, izkFkhZ dk mDr izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj izkFkhZ dks foDVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq ij lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj fn;k x;k gS A

8- ftl i'pkr~ foDVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq ij izkFkhZ nsohyky }kjk Lo;a dh ekSf[kd lk{; ,Mc-1 nsohyky ds :i esa is'k dh x;h gS A tcfd vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls dksbZ lkk{; is'k ugh dh x;h gS A nLrkostksa ds :i esa izkFkhZ , Mc-1 nsohyky }kjk ;|fi dksbZ nLrkost iznf'kZr ugh djok;s x;s gS fdarq Jh Hkksekjke] Jh j.kNksMjke] Jh rkjkjke es?koky o Jh vksadkjyky ds 'kiFk i= QksVks izfr esa fjdkMZ ij gksuk of.kZr fd;k x;k gS A blds vykok izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izn'kZ Mc-1 lqyg okrkZ dk i= izn'kZ Mc-2 inP;qfr ds vkns'k rFkk vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls f'kdk;r i= cSad [kkrs ds feyku ds izek.k i= okmpj izkFkhZ dks izsf"kr fyQkQs] tkap dk;Zokgh dh vknsf'kdk] tkap izfrosnu] vkjksi i= tkap vf/kdkjh fu;qfDr vkns'k vafre vkns'k] v[kckjh dh foKfIr bR;kfn lfgr dqy 117 nLrkost QksVks izfr;ksa esa izLrqr fd;s x;s gS A

9- cgl vafre lquh x;h A izkFkhZ i{k }kjk ekSf[kd rdksZ ds vykok fyf[kr rdZ Hkh is'k fd;s x;s gS tcfd vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ekSf[kd rdZ gh fn;s x;s gS rFkk fyf[kr rdZ is'k ugh fd;s x;s gSA viuh fyf[kr o ekSf[kd rdksZ esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds nksgjko ds lkFk rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi cnys dh Hkkouk ls foDVhekbZts'ku dks >wBs yxk;s x;s gS tks foDVhekbZts'ku dh rkjhQ esa vkrs gS A izkFkhZ ds v/khu dk;Zjr vtqZujke pkS/kjh] lans'kokgd }kjk vHknz Hkk"kk dk iz;ksx djus o vHknz O;ogkj djus ij izkFkhZ }kjk mls jksdk x;k rks mlds }kjk izkFkhZ dks fudyokus dh /kedh nh A izkFkhZ }kjk ;wfu;u cnyus ds dkj.k eSustesaV }kjk mDr dk;Zokgh dh x;h tks foDVhekbZts'ku dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS A izkFkhZ }kjk vkjksfir d`R; ugh fd;s x;s Lo;a f'kdk;rdrkZ Hkksekjke o j.kNksMjke us xyrQgeh esa f'kdk;r djus ckcr~ 'kiFk i= fn;s gS ftudh QksVks izfr i=koyh ij gS A izkFkhZ us dksbZ :i;s izkIr ughs fd;s vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds QthZ gLrk{kj fl) ugh gS A tkap c;ku esa ;g Hkh ugh dgk gS fd mDr vtqZujke ds gLrk{kj QthZ gS A mlds gLrk{kjksa dh dksbZ ,Q ,l ,y tkap ugha djok;h x;h gS ;fn vkjksfir d`R; izkFkhZ }kjk fd;s tkrs rks dksbZ ,Q vkbZ vkj ;k QkStnkjh izdj.k t:j ls ntZ djok;k tkrk tks vizkFkhZ i{k ;k f'kdk;rdrkZvksa us ntZ ugh djok;s gS A foDVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq ij dsoy izkFkhZ dh lk{; gS A vizkFkhZx.k dh dksbZ lk{; ughs gS A ftlls izkFkhZ dh lk{; dk dksbZ [kaMu ugh gksrk gS A izkFkhZ ds }kjk j[ks x;s mDr rF; ,oa foDVhekbZts'ku lkjoku rkSj ij lkfcr gS A U;k;ky; vkjksi u cukus ,oa naMkns'k ds vuqfpr o voS/k gksus ds lkFk nksuksa fcanqvksa dks ns[k ldrk gS A vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 esa /kkjk 11 , ds rgr U;k;ky; dks O;kid {ks=kf/kdkj gS A izkFkhZ ds fo:) vkjksi esjsVsfj;y ugh gS rFkk fl) ughs gksrs gS rFkk mlds fo:) tkjh naMkns'k Hkh rFkkdfFkr vkjksiksa ds lerqY; ughs gS rFkk izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr fodVhekbZts'ku gS A var esa muds }kjk izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse Lohdkj fd;k tkdj Dyse esa pkgk x;k vuqrks"k iznku djus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A muds }kjk vius rdksZ ds leFkZu esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar Hkh izLrqr fd;s x;s gS%&

1- , vkbZ vkj 1984 ,l lh 976 ftrsanzflag jkBkSj cuke Jh cS|ukFk vk;qosZn Hkou fy-]

2- flfoy vihy la- 4436@2010 fudksyl ihjkey bafM;k fy- cuke gfjflag esa ekuuh; loksZPp u;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fn- 30-4-15]939 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 3- , vkbZ vkj 1973 ,l lh 1227 nh odZeSu vkWQ Qk;jLVksu Vk;j ,aM jcj da-vkWQ bafM;k izk0fy0 cuke nh eSustesaV o vU; A

10- [kaMu esa vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls vius ekSf[kd rdksZ esa vius tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dks nksgjkrs gq, rdZ fn;s x;s gS fd foDVhekbZts'ku ij Lo;a izkFkhZ dh lk{; fLFkj ughs gS o ,drjQ rks og vtqZu jke pkS/kjh ds }kjk vHknzrk dj /kedh nsus dk vk/kkj ysrk gS nwljh rjQ eq[;ky; ls fcuk ijeh'ku ds tkuk crkrk gS A og ftjg dh lk{; esa Lohdkj djrk gS fd vtqZu jke pkS/kjh ds fo:) f'kdk;r mlus is'k ugh dh gS A ;wfu;u cnyus ds laca/k esa Hkh nLrkost i=koyh ij ugh gS A mDr lk{kh viuh ftjg esa cny djds ;g Hkh dgrk gS fd fivksu dks fl[kkdj ;wfu;u okyksa us f'kdk;r djok;h fQj cnydj dgrk gS fd u;s ps;jeSu dks ;wfu;u okyksa us cgdk fn;k bl izdkj u rks izkFkhZ dh lk{; fLFkj gS u gh nLrksotksa ls lefFkZr gS u gh foDVhekbZts'ku ls lacaf/kr izkFkhZ }kjk j[ks x;s rF;ksa ds ckjs esa mlds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse vFkok tokcqy tokc esa dksbZ fof'k"V rF; gS tks mlus viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa Lohdkj Hkh fd;k gS A izkFkhZ dh lk{; fojks/kkHkklh gS tks ekus tkus ;ksX; ugh gS A ,sls esa mDr foDVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq vizkFkhZx.k dh lk{; ugh gksus dk dksbZ egRo ugh gS A izkFkhZ ds }kjk f'kdk;rdrkZvksa ds izLrqr 'kiFk i= QksVks izfr;ksa esa gS ftudk dksbZ egRo ugh gS A izkFkhZ f'kdk;rdrkZvksa ds c;ku Hkh djok ldrk Fkk rFkk Lo;a Hkh vtqZujke ds gLrk{kjksa ckcr~ ,Q ,l ,y ls ijh{k.k dk izkFkZuk i= is'k dj ldrk Fkk A izkFkhZ ds fo:) vkjksi tkap ds c;kuksa ls o nLrkostksa ls iwjh rjg ls fl) gS rFkk vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk Hkh lgh rkSj ij mudks ekuk x;k gS u rks tkap ds fu"d"kZ esa Qsj&Qkj dh dksbZ vko';drk gS u gh U;k;ky; dkuwuu dj ldrk gS A U;k;ky; dks dsoy naM ds fcanq ij viuk fofu'p; nsuk gS D;ksafd tkap U;k;ky; }kjk fu"i{k o fof/k lEer~ eku yh x;h gS rFkk ekuuh; jkt0 mPp U;k;ky; }kjk mlds vkns'k dks vikLr ugh fd;k x;k gS cfYd izkFkhZ }kjk viuh fjV ;kfpdk okil yh x;h gS A izkFkhZ ds fo:) ikfjr naMkns'k vkjksiksa ds lerqY; ,oa oS/k gS ftlesa Qsj&Qkj dh dksbZ vko';drk ughs gS A var esa muds }kjk izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse [kkfjt djrs gq, mDr funsZf'kr fookn dk mRrj vizkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A leFkZu esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar Hkh is'k fd;s x;s gS%&

1- 2001 ySc vkbZ lh 2122 ;w ih LVsV jksM VªkaliksVZ dkj0 cuke eksguyky xqIrk ,oa vU;]

2- 2016 ,y ,y vkj 88 ih ,u ch] fjiz-ck; tksuy eSustj] dkyhdV cuke yscj dksVZ] dksthsdksMs o vU;]

3- 2015 ,y ,y vkj 800 izk.k dqekj dkSy cuke bafM;u vksojlht cSad o vU;]

4- 2016 ,y ,y vkj 556 Jh njacjnkj ckjeSu cuke nh lsaVªy cSad vkWQ bafM;k o vU;]

5- 2005 ¼105½ ,Q ,y vkj 688 lh tacwukFku cuke eSustesaV vkWQ /khjsu fpUueykbZ VªkaliksVZ dkj- fy- o vU;]

6- 2006 ¼108½ ,Q ,y vkj 940 ps;jeSu&de&,e Mh] Vh ,u lh ,l dkj- fy- o vU; cuke ds ehjkckbZ]

7- 2015 ,y ,y vkj 1270 odZeSu fjiz-ck; nh lSØsVªh] vklke pkg deZpkjh la?k]tksjgV cuke eSustesaV vkWQ fMQ~ySfVax Vh bZ] tksjgV o vU; A

11- mHk;i{kdkjku~ dh vksj ls fn;s x;s rdksZ ds en~ns utj lacaf/kr fof/k ,oa mHk;i{kdkjku~ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ds vfHkerksa dks fopkj esa ysrs gq, i=koyh dk xaHkhjrkiwoZd ifj'khyu fd;k x;k A

12- izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;fk;d n`"Vkar nh odZeSu vkWQ Qk;j LVksj Vk;j ,aM jcj daiuh vkWQ bafM;k izk- fy- cuke nh eSustesaV o vU; , vkbZ vkj 1973 ,l lh 1227 esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 esa lu~ 1971 ds la'kks/ku vf/kfu;e ds }kjk varLFkkfir /kkjk 11 , ds lac/k esa fuEukafdr fof/k izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& 45. The words "in the course of the adju- dication proceeding, the Tribunal issatisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified" clearly indicates that the Tribunals now clothed with the power to reappraise the evidence in the domestic enquiry and satisfy itself whether the said evidence relied on by an employer, establishes the misconduct alleged against a workman. What was originally a plausible conclusion that could be drawn by an employer from the evidence, has now given place to a satisfaction being arrived at by, lieTribunal that the finding of misconduct is correct. The limitations imposed on the powers of the Tribunal by the decision in Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (1). case can no longer be invoked by an employer. The Tribunal is now at liberty to consider not only whether the finding of misconduct recorded by an employer is 'correct; but also to differ from the said finding if a proper case is made out. What was once largely in the realm of the satisfaction of the employer, has ceased to be so: and now it is the satisfaction of the Tribunal that finally decides the matter.

49. Having held that the right of the employer to adduce evidence continues even under the new section, it is needless to state that, when such evidence is adduced for the first time, it is the Tribunal which has to be satisfied on such evidence about the guilt or otherwise of the workman concerned. The law, as laid 'down by this Court that under such circumstances the issue about the merits of the impugned order of dismissal or discharge is at large before the Tribunal and that it has to decide for itself whether the misconduct alleged is proved, continues to have full effect. In (1) [1972] I.L.L.J. 180, such a case, as laid down by this Court, the exercise of managerial functions does not arise at all. Therefore, it will-be seen that both in respect of cases where a domestic enquiry has been held as also in cases where the Tribunal considers the matter on the evidence adduced before it for the first time, the satisfaction under section 11 A, about the guilt or otherwise of the workman concerned, is that of the Tribunal. It has to consider the evidence and come to a conclusion one way or other. Even in cases where an enquiry has been held by an employer and a finding of misconduct940 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] arrived at, the Tribunal can now differ from that finding in a proper case and hold that no misconduct is proved.

50. We are not inclined to accept the contentions advanced on behalf of the employers that the stage for interference under section 11 A by the Tribunal is reached only when it has to consider the punishment after having accepted the finding of guilt recorded by an employer. It has to be remembered that a Tribunal may 'hold that the punishment is not justified because the misconduct alleged and found proved is such that it does not warrant dismissal or discharge. The Tribunal may also hold that the order of discharge or dismissal is not justified because the alleged misconduct itself is not established by the evidence. To come to a conclusion either way, the Tribunal will have to reappraise the evidence for itself. Ultimately it may hold that the misconduct itself is not proved or that the misconduct proved does not warrant the punishment of dismissal or discharge. That is why, according to us, section 11A now gives full power to the Tribunal to go into the evidence and satisfy-itself on both these points. Now the, jurisdiction of the Tribunal to reappraise the evidence and come to its conclusion enures to it when it has to adjudicate upon the dispute referred to it in which an employer relies on the findings recorded by him in a domestic enquiry. Such a power to appreciate the evidence and come to its own conclusion about the guilt or otherwise was always recognised in a Tribunal when it was deciding a dispute on the basis of evidence adduced before it for the first time. Both categories are now put on a par by section 11 A.

51. Another change, that has been effected by section 11A is the power conferred on a Tribunal to, alter the punishment imposed by an employer. If the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the misconduct is established, either by the domestic enquiry accented by it or by the evidence adduced before it for the. first time, the Tribunal originally had no power to interfere with the punishment imposed by the management. Once the, misconduct is proved, the Tribunal had to sustain the order of punishment unless it was harsh indicating victimisation. Under section 11A, though the .Tribunal may hold that the misconduct is proved, nevertheless it may be of the opinion that the order of discharge or dismissal for the said misconduct is not justified. In other words, the Tribunal may hold that the proved misconduct does not merit punishment by way of discharge or dismissal. It can, under such circumstances, award to the workman any lesser punishment instead. The power to interfere with the punishment and alter the same has been now conferred on the Tribunal by section 1 1 A.

57. We are not inclined to accept the above contention of Mr. Deshmukh. The Proviso specifies matters which the Tribunal shall take into account as also matters which it shall not. The expression 'materials on record, occurring in the Proviso, in our opinion, cannot be confined only to the materials which were available at the domestic enquiry. On the other hand, the 'materials on record' in the Proviso must be held to refer to materials on record before the Tribunal. They take in-

(1) the evidence taken by the management at the enquiry and the proceedings of the enquiry, or (2) the above evidence and in addition, any further evidence led before the Tribunal, or (3) evidence placed before the Tribunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as well as the evidence adduced by the workman contra.

13- mDr U;fk;d n`"Vkar ds vfHker dks fopkj esa ysrs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr fudksyl ihjkey bafM;k izkbZosV fy- cuke gfjflag flfoy vihy la- 4436@2010 ds fu.kZ; fn- 30-4-15 ds ekeys esa fuEukafdr vfHker fn;k x;k gS%&The Labour Court at the first instance has erroneously failed to exercise its jurisdiction by not re-appreciating the evidence on record after holding that the preliminary issue regarding the domestic enquiry conducted by the appellant-Company is legal and valid. The said erroneous finding was challenged by the respondent-workman in the Appellate Court after two remand orders were passed by the Industrial Court. Ultimately, the Labour Court has exercised its jurisdiction and on re-appreciation of the facts and the evidence on record and in accordance with the decision of this Court in The Workmen of M/s. Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (P) Ltd. v. The Management and Ors.[7], it has found fault with the findings of the Inquiry Officer which was endorsed by the Disciplinary Authority which has erroneously held that the workman was guilty of the misconduct. The Labour Court after the two remand orders has rightly come to the conclusion on re-appreciation of the evidence on record and held that the charge levelled against the respondent is partially proved and even then the order of dismissal imposed upon him by the Disciplinary Authority, has been done without notifying the respondent-workman about his past service record, as required under Clause 12(3)(b)&(c) of the SSO, which aspect is rightly noticed and answered by the Labour Court at para 20 of its Award dated 29.10.2007. Thus, the order of dismissal of the workman from the service is disproportionate and severe to the gravity of the misconduct.

14- izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vakr ftrsanzflag jkBkSM cuke Jh oS|ukFk Hkou fy- o vU; , vkbZ vkj 1984 ,l lh 976 esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk yscj dksVZ }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ds en~ns utj vkjksiksa dks vkaf'kd :i ls gh fl) gksuk ekurs gq, lsok i`FkDdj.k ds vkns'k dks vikLr fd;k tkuk lgh gksuk vfHkfu/kkZfjr djrs gq, yscj dksVZ ds vf/kfu.kZ; dks lgh Bgjk;k x;k gS A

15- gLrxr izdj.k esa izkFkhZ , Mc-1 nsohyky }kjk foDVhekbZts'ku ds facanq ij izLrqr viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa vtqZujke pkS/kjh lans'kokgd }kjk vHknz Hkk"kk dk iz;ksx djrs gq, vHknz O;ogkj djus ij izkFkhZ }kjk jksdus ij ugh ekuus rFkk ukSdjh ls fudyus dh /kedh nsus o vtqZu jke pkS/kjh }kjk cnys dh Hkkouk ls vkjksi yxkus ,oa izkFkhZ ds ;wfu;u dk lfdz; dk;ZdrkZ gksus ds dkj.k cnys dh Hkkouk ls izsfjr gksdj foDVhekbZts'ku fd;k tkdj lsok lekfIr dk naM fn;k tkus ,oa mlds fo:) vkjksi fl) ugh gksus ,oa Hkhekjke o j.kNksMjke f'kdk;rdrkZvksa }kjk 'kiFk i=941 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 fy[kdj nsus ftldh izfr i=koyh ij gksus dh lk{; nh x;h gS ftjg esa mlus lk{; nh gS fd mlus vtqZujke pkS/kjh }kjk vHknz Hkk"kk cksyus o vHknz O;ogkj djus ds dze esa mPpkf/kdkfj;ksa dks ekSf[kd o fyf[kr f'kdk;r dh Fkh fQj dgk gS fd og fcuk eq[;ky; ijeh'ku ds vius xkao pyk tkrk Fkk vkSj eu&ekuh djrk Fkk ftldh mlus mPpkf/kdkfj;ksa ls f'kdk;r dh Fkh f'kdk;r dh izfr U;k;ky; esa is'k ugh dhs gS A cSad esa is'k dh Fkh ftldh izfr fcuk vuqefr ds ugh ys ldrk A rkjkjke es?koky ds lkeus vtqZujke us gLrk{kj dj jde izkIr dh Fkh tks ckr tokcqy tokc esa ugh fy[kh gS A vtqZujke pkS/kjh us okmpj ij gLrk{kj djds Hkqxrku izkIr fd;k Fkk tks ckr Hkh tokcqy tokc esa vafdr ughs gS A ;g dguk xyr gS fd Hkksekjke o j.kNksMjke us mldks 16-11-05 dks vius 'kiFk i= ugh fn;s gks o mlus feyhHkxr djds cSd MsV esa rS;kj djok;s gks A Hkksekjke o j.kNksMjke }kjk xyrQgeh esa f'kdk;r nsus ckcr~ ckr tokcqy tokc esa ugh fy[kh gks A og Hkksekjke o j.kNksMjke ls f'kdk;r djus ds i'pkr~ tkap dk;Zokgh iwjh gksus ls igys fey fy;k Fkk ftUgksusa mldh xyr f'kdk;r djus ckcr~ dg fn;k Fkk A cSad ;wfu;u ds esacj ckcr~ izek.k i= is'k ughs fd;k A gMrky esa eSustesaV ds lkFk dke fd;k Fkk blfy, ;wfu;u okys ukjkt Fks ftUgksusa cnys dh Hkkouk ls fivksu dks fl[kkdj f'kdk;r djok;h Fkh A ;g ckr tokcqy tokc esa ugh fy[kh gS A cSad dk ps;jeSu nwljk vk x;k Fkk ;wfu;u okyksa ds cgdkos esa vkdj vkjksi i= fn;k Fkk mlus ,u vks McY;w ;wfu;u dks NksMdj , vkbZ ch , ;wfu;u Tokbu dj yh Fkh A ;wfu;u dh xfrfof/k;ksa dh otg ls foDVhekbzts'ku djus ds fy, pktZ'khV nh gks ;g ckr LVsVesaV vWkQ Dyse o tokcqy tokc esa ugh fy[kh dkj.k ugh crk ldrk A ;g dguk xyr gS fd cSad }kjk foDVhekbZts'ku djus dh fu;r ls vkjksi i= nsdj tkap djok;h x;h gksA i=koyh ij izkFkhZ }kjk QksVks izfr;ksa esa Jh Hkksekjke o j.kNksMjke ds 'kiFk i= Hkh is'k fd;s x;s gS ftUgksusa muesa xyrQgeh o yksxksa ds cgdkos esa vkus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ ds fo:) f'kdk;r djuk o jde Lo;a gLrk{kj dj izkIr djuk ntZ djok;k gS A lkFk gh mUgksusa f'kdk;r ckcr~ cSad ds mPPkkf/kdkfj;ksa ds le{k fn;s x;s c;ku xyrQgeh ls nsuk Hkh ntZ djok;k gS A i=koyh ij izkFkhZ dh vksj ls rkjkjke es?koky dk Hkh 'kiFk i= dh QksVks izfr esa izLrqr gS ftlus vtqZujke }kjk mlds lkeus gLrk{kj dj jde fudyokus ckcr~ rF; ntZ gS A izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vksadkjyky ds 'kiFk i= dh QksVks izfr Hkh is'k dh x;h gS ftlesa mlus izkFkhZ dks viuk fdjk;snkj crk;k x;k gS A mDr 'kiFk i= izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls vly is'k ughs fd;s x;s gS u gh mDr 'kiFk i= ds nkrkvksa dks izkFkhZ }kjk lk{; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS A vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr LVsVesaV vkWQ ,fyxs'ku fn-3-5-05 esa /kks[kk/kMh o xcu laca/kh izkFkhZ ij igyk vkjksi gS fd mlds }kjk fn-25@27-9-2004 dks vtqZujke pkS/kjh lans'kokgd ds QthZ gLrk{kjksa dk vkgj.k i= rS;kj djds mldk banzkt lacaf/kr [kkrs esa fcuk fd;s Hkqxrku izkIr fd;k x;k A nwljk vkjksi gS fd vf/kfod"kZ [kkrk esa banzkt ugh fd;k o lkekU; cgh feyku ckcr~ xyr lwpuk;sa izsf"kr dh x;hA rhljk vkjksi gS fd fn-27-11-04 dks [kkrk/kkjd Jh Hkksekjke es?koky ds uke okmpj cklB gtkj :i;s dk vadu dj mDr jkf'k Hkksekjke dks ugh nh x;h gS A pkSFkk vkjksi gS fd _.kh Jh j.kNksMjke ds _.k [kkrs esa cklB gtkj :i;s dh udn izkfIr nf'kZr dj mDr jde dk Hkqxrku fd;k tkuk crkdj mls dsoy isarhl gtkj :i;s dh jkf'k dk gh Hkqxrku fd;k x;k A ikapoka vkjksi gS fd izkFkhZ vius 'olqj] lkyk] iRuh o vU; O;fDr;ksa dks lkFk ysdj fn-11-1-05 dks cSad vk;k vkSj vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj fd;k o 'kk[kk izca/kd Jh vkj ih eh.kk] vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ,e ,y lhjoh ij ncko Mkydj iSarkyhl gtkj :i;s izkIr gksus dh jlhn nsus dh ekax dh x;h ftlls cSad esa ekgkSy rukowi.kZ jgk gS o cSad dk;Z esa ck/kk igqaph A mDr O;fDr;ksa dks cqjk vatke gksus dh /kedh Hkh nh x;h A NBk vkjksi gS fd fofo/k nsunkj [kkrs ls vfxze izkIr dh x;h dqy jkf'k 2930@&:i;s dk xcu fd;kA mDr vkjksiksa dh tkap izkFkhZ ds ckjckj lwpuk ds vuqifLFkr jgus ij tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk ,di{kh; dh x;h A tkap ds nkSjku izLrqrdrkZ vf/kdkjh }kjk xokg ds :i esa Jh vkj ih eh.kk vf/kdkjh 'kk[kk eykj] Jh vtqZujke pkS/kjh lans'kokgd _.kh Jh j.kNksMjke ,oa Jh Hkksekjke ds c;ku djok;s tkrs gq, nLrksot izn'kZ ih&1 yxk;r ih&36 is'k fd;s x;s gS A mDr lHkh vizkFkhZx.k ds xokgku~ }kjk viuh&viuh lk{; esa izkFkhZ ds fo:) mDr vkjksiksa ds leFkZu esa lk{; nh gS ftuls tkap ,di{kh; gksus ls dksbZ ftjg ugh gqbZ gS A tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk tkap fu"d"kZ esa vtqZu jke pkS/kkjh lans'kokgd ds f'kdk;r i= izn'kZ ih&1 25&27 flracj 2000 ds vf/kfod"kZ [kkrk la-02 vtqZujke pkS/kjh ,oa izn'kZih&2 esa isarkyhl gtkj :i;s ds vkgj.k ,oa fn-27-9-04 dh udn izkfIr ,oa Hkqxrku dhs cgh dh izfr izn'kZ ih&3 esa iSarkyhl gtkj :i;s ds Hkqxrku dk vadu gksus ,oa 'kk[kk eykj ds izca/kd Jh eh.kk ds i= fn- 17-1-05 izn'kZ ih&4 esa 'ks"kksa dk feyku yacs le; ls ughs gksus o feyku esa dkQh vfu;ferrk gksus ckcr~ vadu gksus ,oa Lo;a izkFkhZ ds i= fn-7-1-05 izn'kZ ih&11 esa izkFkhZ }kjk :i;s dhs vko';drk gksus blfy, izkFkhZ }kjk vtqZujke pkS/kjh dks fuosnu fd;s tkus ds vadu ,oa vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds i= fn-7-1-05 izn'kZ ih&12 esa isarkyhl gtkj :i;s ds QthZ vkgj.k ckcr~ vadu gksus ,oa vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds vf/kfod"kZ [kkrk la-2 ds ystj dh Nk;k izfr izn'kZ ih&20 esa iSarkyhl gtkj :i;s o cSysal dh izfof"V vafdr gksus ,oa dS'k cqd dh izfrfyfi izn'kZ ih&21 esa mDr QthZ vkgj.k vafdr gksus ,oa lkekU; cgh dh izfrfyfi izn'kZ ih&22 esa Hkh ,slk gh vadu gksus rFkk 'kk[kk vf/kdkjh Jh eh.kk ds i= fn-4-1-05 izn'kZ ih&25 ,oa Jh vkj ih eh.kk ,oa vtqZujke ds c;kuksa esa mDr izdkj jkf'k izkFkhZ }kjk vtqZujke ds [kkrs ls fudys tkus ds rF; gksus ds vk/kkj ij vkjksi la-1 fl) ekuk x;k gS A blh izdkj tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk vius tkap izfrosnu esa izn'kZ ih&5 yxk;r ih&10 ekg tqykbZ 2004 ls ekg fnlacj 2004 ds 'ks"k ds feyku dh fooj.kh ,oa izn'kZ ih&13 'ks"k cgh dh Nk;k izfr ,oa Jh vkj ih eh.kk dh ekSf[kd lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vkjksi la-2 Hkh fl) gksuk ekuk x;k gS A izn'kZ ih&14 Jh Hkksekjke ds f'kdk;r i= fn-27-1-05 izn'kZ ih&16 okmpj izn'k ih&18 ystj dh Nk;k izfr;ksa ,oa Jh Hkksekjke dh ekSf[kd lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vkjksi la-3 Hkh fl) ekuk x;k gS A nLrkost izn'kZ ih&15 f'kdk;r i= Jh j.kNksMjke fn-27-1-05] izn'kZ ih&17 okmpj izn'kZ ih&19 ystj izn'kZ ih&23 udn Hkqxrku ,oa izkfIr dh cgh dh izfr ,oa Jh j.kNksMjke ds c;kuksa ds vk/kkj ij vkjksi la-4 Hkh fl) ekuk x;k gS A nLrkost izn'kZ ih&24 f'kdk;r i= vtqZujke pkS/kjh ckcr~ nqO;Zogkj ,oa /kedh fn-11-1-05] izn'kZ ih&26 'kk[kk izca/kd Jh eh.kk ds i= fn-11-1-05 dh Nk;k izfr ,oa mDr Jh vtqZujke pkS/kjh c;kuksa ds n`f"Vxr ikpoka vkjksi Hkh fl) ekuk x;k gSA tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk vius tkap ds fu"d"kZ esa izn'kZ ih&29 yxk;r 36 okmpjksa ds vk/kkj ij NBk vkjksi Hkh fl) ekuk x;k gS A bl izdkj Nvksa vkjksi fl) ekurs gq, tkap vf/kdkjh942 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] }kjk viuk tkap izfrosnu fn-12-9-05 dks vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh ds le{k izLrqr fd;k x;k gS A mDr tkap izfrosnu dks fopkj esa yrs gq, vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk fn-28-9-05 dks tkap vf/kdkjh ds fu"d"kksZ ls lger gksrs gq, rFkk izkFkhZ ds gj dk;Zokgh esa vuqifLFkr jgus dks fopkj esa ysrs gq, vizkFkhZx.k ds cSad Fkkj vkapfyd xzkeh.k csad ¼vf/kdkjh ,oa deZpkjh½ lsok fu;e 2000 dh /kkjk 38¼2½ ds varZxr izkFkhZ dks cSad dh lsok ls inP;qfr dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS A vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls i=koyh ij mDr foosfpr ekSf[kd o nLrkosth lk{; QksVks izfr esa izLrqr dh x;h gS ftuds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V rkSj ls izdV gksrk gS fd tkap ds nLrkost izn'kZ ih&1 yxk;r ih&36 ,oa vizkFkhZx.k ds mDr lkf{k;ksa ds c;kuksa ds vk/kkj ij mDr ifjfLFkfr esa tcfd mudk ftjg vFkok fdlh izdkj dh vU; lk{; ds ek/;e ls dksbZ Hkh [kaMu ughs gS dksbZ Hkh rdZlaxr lkekU; cqf) dk O;fDr ogh fu"d"kZ fudkyrk tks fd tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk viuh tkap fjiksVZ esa fn;k x;k gS A

16- izkFkhZ dh vksj ls foDVheksbZts'ku ds fcanq ij izLrqr lk{; dk voyksdu djus ij ;g Li"V gS fd izFke rks ;g ,d:i esa ugh gS D;ksafd viuh eq[; ijh{kk dh lk{; esa izkFkhZ , Mc-1 nsohyky vtqZu jke pkS/kjh f'kdk;drkZ }kjk mlls vHknz Hkk"kk dk iz;ksx djrs gq, nqO;Zogkj djus ds rF; j[krk gS fQj og ftjg esa mDr rF; dks j[krs gq, mDr vtqZu yky pkS/kjh f'kdk;rdrkZ ds fcuk ijeh'ku ds xkao pys tkuk o eu&ekuh djus ds rF; j[krk gS fQj og Lo;a }kjk ;wfu;u cnyus ds dkj.k ;wfu;u okyksa }kjk cnys dh Hkkouk ls fivksu dks fl[kkdj mlds fo:) f'kdk;r djokus ds rF; j[krk gS fQj og mlds gMrky esa dk;Z djus o ;wfu;u okyksa }kjk nwljs ps;jeSu ds vkus ij mls fl[kkdj ;wfu;u dh xfrfof/k dh otg ls foDVhekbZts'ku djus ds fy, pktZ'khV fn;s tkus ds rF; j[krk gS A f}rh;r% og Lo;a viuh ftjg esa ekurk gS fd Jh vtqZujkepkS/kjh ds fo:) mlds }kjk mPpkf/kdkfj;ksa dks f'kdk;r dh x;h Fkh ftlds rFkk ;wfu;u cnyus ,oa gMrky esa dk;Z djus ds nLrkost i=koyh ij ugh gksuk Hkh og Lohdkj djrk gS ftl dkj.k mldh ekSf[kd lk{; dh laiqf"V dkjd nLrkosth lk{; dk vfLrRo mldh utjksa esa gksus ls badkjh ugh dh tk ldrh gS ftldk i=koyh ij vHkko gS ;fn izkFkhZ pkgrk rks ,slh nLrkosth laiqf"V dkjd lk{; vFkkZr~ vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds fo:) dh x;h f'kdk;r o ;wfu;u cnyus ,oa gMrky esa dk;Z djus laca/kh nLrkost U;k;ky; ds ek/;e ls vizkFkhZx.k ls ryc djok ldrk Fkk A r`rh; mlds }kjk f'kdk;r drkZ Jh Hksekjke o Jh j.kNksMjke ds 'kiFk i=ksa dh izfr i=koyh ij is'k dh x;h gS ftuds en~ns utj ;g Hkh ugh ekuk tk ldrk gS fd mlds ikl vius i{k esa ekSf[kd laiqf"Vdkjd lk{; ugh Fkh mDr f'kdk;drkvksa dks og U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj ldrk Fkk vFkok ryc djok ldrk Fkk ,oa viuh ekSf[kd lk{; dh iqf"V dj ldrk Fkk tks mlds }kjk ugh fd;k tkus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa ekSf[kd laiqf"V dkjd lk{; dk Hkh vHkko gS A prqFkZr% foDVhekbZts'ku ds alca/k esa mlus vius vfHkopuksa esa dsoy ;g rF; j[kk gS fd mlds fo:) vkjksi O;fDrxr jaft'k ds dkj.k yxk;s x;s gS tcfd mDr fcanq ij viuh ekSf[kd lk{; esa mlus rjg&rjg ds vk/kkj fy;s gS rFkk mlus viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds }kjk tks rF; mldh lk{; esa j[ks x;s gS ,sls vfHkopu mlds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse o tokcqy tokc esa ugh gS A mDr leLr ifjfLFkfr esa vizkFkhZ dh foDVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq ij dksbZ lk{; ugh gksrs gq, Hkh Lo;a izkFkhZ dh vksj ls foDVhekbZts'ku ckcr~ j[ks x;s rF; fl) ugh ekus tk ldrs gS vFkkZr~ izkFkhZ foDVhekbZts'ku ds dkj.k mDr vkjksi yxk;s tkus ds rF;ksa dks fl) djus esa foQy jgk gS A

17- izkFkhZ dh vksj ls rdZ fn;s x;s gS fd mlds fo:) vqtZu jke pkS/kjh ds laca/k esa yxk;s x;s vkjksi fl) ugh gksrs gSA D;ksafd vtqZu jke pkS/kjh }kjk tkap vf/kdkjh ds le{k vius c;ku esa ;g ughs dgk x;k gS fd mlds okmpj ij gLrk{kj ugh gS A bl laca/k esa mldh vksj ls i=koyh ij Jh rkjkpan ds 'kiFk i= dk Hkh ftdz fd;k x;k gS A mudh vksj ls ;g Hkh rdZ fn;k x;k gS fd Jh vtqZu jke pkS/kjh ds okmpj dh dksbZ ,Q ,l ,y tkap ughs djok;h x;h A gekjs fouez er esa Jh vtqZu jke pkS/kjh }kjk vius tkap vf/kdkjh ds le{k gq, c;kuksa esa iSrkyhsl gtkj ds okmpj dks Li"V rkSj ij QthZ crk;k x;k gS fQj Lo;a izkFkhZ bl laca/k esa Jh rkjkjke ds 'kiFk i= dh izfr izLrqr djrk gS ftlus mlesa ntZ djok;k gS fd Jh vtqZu jke pkS/kjh us okmpj ij mlds lkeus gLrk{kj fd;s Fks ;fn ,slk Fkk rks fQj izkFkhZ foDVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq ij viuh lk{; ds nkSjku mDr Jh rkjkpan ds c;ku U;k;ky; esa djok ldrk Fkk fdarq mlds }kjk ,slk ugh fd;k x;k A blds vykok i=koyh ij izkFkhZ dk Lo;a dk i= tks fd tkap ds nkSjku izn'kZ ih&11 ds :i esa iznf'kZr gqvk gS Hkh miyC/k gS ftlesa mlus iSarkyhl gtkj :i;s vtqZu jke pkS/kjh ds [kkrs ls fudkys x;s dks izkIr djus dh o mUgsa okil ykSVkus ds dFku ntZ djok;s x;s gS A mDr leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fn;s x;s mDr rdksZ ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks dksbZ Qk;nk ughs feyrk gS rFkk ;g ugh ekuk tk ldrk gS fd vtqZujke pkS/kjh ds laca/k esa vkjksi izekf.kr ugh gS A

18- Jh Hkksekjke o Jh j.kNksMjke f'kdk;rdrkZvksa ds 'kiFk i=ksa dh izfr ds gokyk ls izkFkhZ dh vksj ls rdZ fn;s x;s gS fd mDr 'kiFk i=ksa ls izkFkhZ ds fo:) yxk;s x;s mDr 'kiFk i=nkrkvksa ds laca/k esa vkjksi >wBs izdV gksrs gS fdarq gekjs fouez er esa dsoy 'kiFk i= dh QksVks izfr;ksa ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ ds i{k esa mDr Jh Hkksekjke o Jh j.kNksMjke ls lacaf/kr vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa dksbZ jk; ughs cuk;h tk ldrh gS D;ksafd mudks izkFkhZ }kjk fodVhekbZts'ku ds fcanq ij Lo;a dh lk{; ds nkSjku izLrqr ughs fd;k x;k gS ;fn izkFkhZ mudks izLrqr djrk rks vizkFkhZx.k dks muls ftjg dk volj feyrk A fcuk ftjg ds dsoy QksVksizfr;ksa esa 'kiFk i=ksa dk dksbZ dkuwuu egRo ugh gS A

19- izkFkhZ dh vksj ls xcu vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa dksbZ ,Q vkbZ vkj f'kdk;rdrkZvksa o vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ntZ ugh djok;s tkus o Qkstnkjh dk;Zokgh ugha djus ds vk/kkj ij Hkh vkjksiksa dks >wBk crk;k x;k gS fdarq ;g f'kdk;rdrkZvksa ,oa vizkFkhZx.k dk fodYi Fkk ;fn muds }kjk ,slk ugh fd;k x;k gS rks blls ;g rkRi;Z ughs fudkyk tk ldrk gS fd f'kdk;rdrkZvksa ,oa vizkFkhZx.k }kjk dksbZ ,Q vkbZ vkj ntZ ughs djok;s tkus ;k QkStnkjh dk;Zokgh ughs fd;s tkus ds dkj.k vkjksi >wBs gks tkrs gSa A943 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 20- mDr foospukuqlkj izkFkhZ ds fo:) vkjksfir mDr Nvksa vkjksi fl) gksus ij dksbZ lansg ugh gS rFkk izkFkhZ foDVhekbZts'ku ds dkj.k mDr vkjksi yxk;s tkus ds rF;ksa dks fl) djus esa foQy jgk gS A ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa U;k;ky; dks vc ;g ns[kuk gS fd D;k mDr vkjksiksa ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dh inP;qfr fd;k tkuk voS/k gS o U;k;laxr ugh gSA bl laca/k esa vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d nq"Vkar 2001 ySc vkbZ lh 2122 ;w ih LVsV jksM VªkaliksVZ dkj- cuke eksguyky xqIrk ,oa vU; esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEu izdkj vfHker fn;k x;k gS% 8. On the wake of the situation as above, we are of opinion that the question of award of any minor punishment in the facts of the matter under consideration does not and cannot arise and neither the Labour Court could alter the punishment of termination of service having regard to its assessment of facts and the contentions as regards the validity of the Inquiry proceedings. The employee has been found to be guilty of misappropriation and in such an event if the appellant-Corporation loses its confidence vis-à-vis the employee, it will be neither proper nor fair on the part of the Court to substitute the finding and confidence of the employer with that of its own in allowing reinstatement. The misconduct stands proved and in such a situation, by reason of the gravity of the offence, the Labour Court cannot exercise its discretion and alter the punishment— vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2016 ,y ,y vkj 88 ih ,u ch] fjiz-ck; tksuy eSustj] dkyhdV cuke yscj dksVZ] dksthsdksMs o vU; esa cSad [kkrs esa QkWM~;wysaV ,aVªht o cSad ds uqdlku ds en~ns utj deZpkjh dh inP;qfr dk naM deZpkjh ds fnO;kax gksus ds vk/kkj ij vkjksiksa ds lerqY; ugh gksuk ekus tkus ds Je U;k;ky; ds vf/kfu.kZ; dks fof/k vuqlkj vuqKs; ugh gksuk ekuuh; dsjyk mPp U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA mudh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2015 ,y ,y vkj 800 izk.k dqekj dkSy cuke bafM;u vksojlht cSad o vU; esa ekuuh; fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEukafdr vfHker fn;k x;k gS%&18. Firstly, I may note that the only pleading in the writ petition with respect to the disproportionate punishment is three lines of Ground AA and which only blandly states that penalty imposed is highly excessive and disproportionate punishment. No facts are given and no reasoning supplied in the writ petition as to how, and why, and on basis of which facts, that it can be said that the punishment imposed upon the petitioner is highly disproportionate in the facts of the case. In fact, the facts of the case show that lack of integrity has been proved against the petitioner that he was making fraudulent withdrawals and entries in the customer's accounts. If making false debit entries for transactions is allowed in banks then people will lose their faith in the banking system. Once the charges of lack of integrity of the petitioner are found/established to be true, the removal from service cannot be said to be such a disproportionate punishment which shocks the judicial conscience of this Court so that the punishment can be interfered by holding it as disproportionate. It is trite that courts do not substitute their own view of punishment as compared to the punishments imposed by the departmental authorities, more so, when no facts are established or shown as to why removal from service is a disproportionate punishment where lack of integrity is found and which must necessarily result in the banking profession with the punishment of removal from service.

21- vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vakr 2016 ,y ,y vkj 556 Jh njacjnkj ckjeSu cuke nh lsaVªy cSad vkWQ bafM;k o vU; esa ekuuh; xqokgkVh mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEu izdkj ls vfHker fn;k x;k gS%&11. The authoritative pronouncements of the Apex Court on the doctrine of proportionality shows that generally the choice as regards to the quantum of punishment is within the jurisdiction and discretion of the disciplinary authority. An exception is carved out only in a case where the quantum of punishment ex facie appears to be so disproportionate to the offence charged that it shocks the conscience of the Court. In the instant case the respondent authorities had rightly exercised its choice having regard to the nature of misconduct of the appellant. The punishment of dismissal from service has been correctly applied to the fact situation of the case and we find no error in interfering with the order of dismissal from service and the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge. The punishment so imposed in the given facts do not come within the realm of being strikingly disproportionate to the extent of shocking the conscience of the Court.

22- vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2005 ¼105½ ,Q ,y vkj 688 lh tacwukFku cuke eSustesaV vkWQ /khjsu fpUueykbZ VªkaliksVZ dkj- fy- o vU; esa ekuuh; enzkl mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEu izdkj ls vfHker fn;k x;k gS%&4- It has been held by the Supreme Court in Janatha Bazar v. Secretary, Sahakari Noukarara Santha, AIR 2000 SC 3129 that once the act of misappropriation is proved, may be for a small or large amount, there is no question of showing uncalled for sympathy and reinstalling the employee in service. In the above decision, the Supreme Court relied on its earlier decision reported in Municipal Committee, Bahadurgarh v. Krishnan Behari & Ors., JT 1996 (3) SC 96 wherein it was held that in cases of misappropriation, there cannot be any other punishment other than dismissal. It was further observed by the Supreme Court that any sympathy shown in such cases is totally uncalled for and opposed to public interest. The amount misappropriated may be small or large, but it is the act of misappropriation that is relevant.

23- U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2006 ¼108½ ,Q ,y vkj 940 ps;jeSu&de&,e Mh] Vh ,u lh ,l dkj0fy0 o vU; cuke ds ehjkckbZ esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEu izdkj fof/k izfrikfnr dh x;h gS% --The scope of judicial review is very limited. Sympathy or generosity as a factor is impermissible. In our view, loss of confidence is the primary factor and not the amount of money misappropriated. In the instant case, the respondent employee is found guilty of misappropriating the Corporation funds. There is nothing wrong in the Corporation losing confidence or faith in such an employee and awarding punishment of dismissal. In such cases, there is no place for generosity or misplaced sympathy on the part of the judicial forums and interfering therefor with the quantum of punishment awarded by the disciplinary and Appellate Authority.

24- vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ghs izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2015 ,y ,y vkj 1270 odZeSu fjiz-ck; nh lSdzsVªh] vklke pkg deZpkjh la?k] tksjgV cuke eSustesaV vkWQ fMQ~ySfVax Vh bZ]tksjgV o vU; esa ekuuh xqokgkVh mPp U;k;ky; }kjk944 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] fuEu izdkj ls vfHker fn;k x;k gS%&In the present case, the garden clerk is found guilty of systematic pilferage or misappropriation from the wage bills of the workers and under such circumstances, the loss of confidence of the management cant be said to be unreasonable. Therefore in my view, the punishment of dismissal for such serious misconduct does not justify interference of the High Court, as this is not found to be a case of victmization of the delinquent clerk. More over the conclusions reached by the industrial Tribunal on the five chargaes in my perception are established adequately from the exhibited register (s)and oral testimony of the witnesses and no infirmity is found with this conclusion. In such circumstances, the ratio of Workmen of M/s. Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co.of India (Pvt.)Ltd.,(Supra)can have no application in the present case.

25- mDr leLr U;kf;d n`"Vkar ds vfHker dks fopkj eas ysrs gq, izkFkhZ ds fo:) izekf.kr /kks[kk/kMh o xcu laca/kh mDr vkjksiksa ds n`f"Vxr ;g U;k;ky; izkFkhZ ds fo:) vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ikfjr naMkns'k dks u rks vkjksiksa ds lerqY; ugh gksuk ikrk gS vkSj u gh U;k;ky; dh vkRek dks >d>ksj nsus okyk ikrk gS A mDr leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izkFkhZ dh dksbZ enn ugh djrs gS RkFkk izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugh ik;k tkrk gS A vr% rnuqlkj gh mDr fookn dk vf/kfu.kZ; fn;s tkus ;ksX; gS A

vkns'k

26- vr% izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse fo:) vizkFkhZx.k vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;s tkrs gq, mDr funsZf'kr fookn dk vf/kfu.kZ; bl izdkj ls ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd vizkFkhZ t;iqj Fkkj xzkeh.k cSad ds izca/ku }kjk izkFkhZ Jh nsohyky fnokdj iq= Jh iUukyky dks vius vkns'k fn- 28-9-2005 ls inP;qr fd;s tkus dk d`R; U;k;ksfpr ,oa fof/k laxr gS rFkk izkFkhZ fdlh izdkj ds vuqrks"k dk gdnkj ugh gS A [kpkZ i{kdkjku~ viuk&viuk ogu djsaxs A

27- vf/kfu.kZ; fy[kk;k tkdj vkt fnukad 11-9-2018 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa gLrk{kj dj lquk;k x;kA vokMZ dh izfr fu;ekuqlkj dsanz ljdkj dks okLrs xtV esa izdk'ku izsf"kr dh tkos A

,l- ,u- Vsyj] U;k;k/kh'k

ubZ fnYyh] 20 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 304-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vtesj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 02@18½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2019

S.O. 304.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 02/18) of the .Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ajmer as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-12025/01/2019-IR(B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

vuqca/k

Je U;k;ky; ,oa vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] vtesj

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh&Jh ,l-,u-Vsyj] vkj-,p-ts-,l

izdj.k la[;k&lh vkbZ Vh vkj 02@18

lh vkbZ ,l ua- lh vkbZ Vh vkj 02@2018

dqynhi flag iaokj iq= Jh usehpan iaokj fuoklh eq-iks- vjkabZ]

rglhy vjkabZ ftyk vtesj

---izkFkhZ

cuke

1- egkizca/kd Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad t;iqj gSM vkWfQl fryd ekxZ] lh Ldhe] t;iqj

2- 'kk[kk izca/kd Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad 'kk[kk vjkabZ] ftyk vtesj

---vizkFkhZx.k945 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 mifLFkfr

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % Jh jkts'k [kUuk] vf/koDrk A

vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls % Jh ,l ds lsBh] vf/koDrk A

vokMZ

fnukad 08-8-2018

1- izkFkhZ dqynhi us vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) viuk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse fn- 2-1-2018 dks izLrqr dj mlesa vfHkopu fd;s gS fd mldh fu;qfDr vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu fn-2-2-2011 dks nQ~rjh e; lQkbZ deZpkjh ds in ij gqbZ A vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu esgur] bZekunkjh o yxu ls vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk esa dk;Z fd;k gS A vizkFkhZ la-2 us izkFkhZ dks fn- 31-12-15 dks ekSf[kd vkns'kksa ls gVk fn;k A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izfrfnu izkFkhZ dh ,d lkns jftLVj esa gktjh yh tkrh Fkh vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izkFkhZ ls izfrfnu cSad dh lQkbZ djokuk] VscYl dh lQkbZ djokuk] >kMw yxokuk okmpjksa dh QkbZfyax djokuk o okmpjksa dks b/kj ls m/kj ykuk ys tkuk o nwljh 'kk[kkvksa ls nwljs cSadksa ls okmpjksa dks fHktokuk o eaxokuk o Mkd ykuk o ys tkuk vkfn dk;Z djok;s tkrs Fks A vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ ls ,d izek.k i= ds okbZ lh dk tkjh dj j[kk Fkk A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izkFkhZ ls izR;sd ekg Hkqxrku gsrq ,d izkFkZuk i= fy;k tkrk Fkk vkSj ml izkFkZuk i= ij izkFkhZ dks tfj;s okmpj ds izR;sd ekg Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izkFkhZ ls fo'ks"k mRloksa ij Hkh dk;Z djok;k tkrk Fkk A izkFkhZ us ,d o"kZ esa rFkk ckjg ekg esa yxkrkj fu;fer :i ls 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z fd;k gS tcfd cSafdax vf/kfu;e 180 fnu yxkrkj fu;fer :i ls ftl deZpkjh us lsok;sas iwjh dh gS og LFkk;h gksus dk vf/kdkjh gks pqdk gksrk gS A vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr djus ls iwoZ izkFkhZ dks dksbZ dkj.k ughs crk;k dksbZ uskfVl ughs fn;k dksbZ NaVuh dk uksfVl o NaVuh eqvkotk ughs fn;k vkbZ Mh ,DV dh /kkjk 25 ,Q th ,p dk rFkk Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 14 o 16 dk [kqYye [kqYyk mYya?ku djds izkFkhZ dh lsok;sa xyr voS/k o xSj dkuwuh :i ls lekIr dh gS A izkFkhZ dk dk;Z yxkrkj fu;fer izd`fr dk Fkk A vizkFkhZx.k dk ;g d`R; vuQs;j yscj izSfDVl dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gS A vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ ds lkFk lkSrsyk O;ogkj djrs gq, izkd`frd o uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl)karksa dk mYya?ku fd;k gS A izkFkhZ us ekuuh; jkt0 mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds le{k viuh ,l ch flfoy fjV ;kfpdk la-5265@2017 dqynhiflag o vU; cuke LVsV cSad vkWQ chdkusj ,aM t;iqj dh is'k dh ftl ij ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj us fn- 4-9-2017 dks viuk vkns'k ikfjr djrs gq, izkFkhZ dhs mDr ;kfpdk dks okil ykSVk fn;k vkSj vkbZ Mh ,DV ds varZxr is'k djus gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k vkSj ;g Hkh funsZ'k tkjh fd;s fd Je U;k;ky; izkFkhZ ds mDr izdj.k ds ukS ekg esa fuf.kZr djs A izkFkhZ us fn- 20-9-2017 dks le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k viuh f'kdk;r is'k dh vizkFkhZx.k us viuk tokc le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds ;gka is'k fd;k nksuksa i{kksa dh okrkZ djok;h tks vlQy ?kksf"kr gqbZ ftl ij le>kSrk vf/kdkjh us izkFkhZ dks /kkjk 2 , vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dk izek.k i= tkjh djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; ds le{k viuk Dyse is'k djus ds fy, funsZf'kr fd;k A var esa izkFkhZ ds ekSf[kd lsok lekfIr vkns'k fn-31-12-2015 dks voS/k] 'kwU; o xSj dkuwuh ?kksf"kr djrs gq, fiNys iw.kZ] iwoZ] osru] ykHk] ifjykHk lfgr cgky djus] izkFkhZ dks LFkkbZ deZpkjh ekurs gq, izkFkhZ dks LFkk;h osrueku] osru J`a[kyk o HkRrs e; ,fj;j o e; vBkjg izfr'kr C;kt] eqdnes dk [kpkZ lfgr fnyokus dh izkFkZuk dh gS A

2- vizkFkhZx.k }kjk tokc izLrqr fd;k tkdj izkFkhZ ds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dks enokj vLohdkj djrs gq, vfHkopu fd;s gS fd Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ,d jk"Vz~h;d`r foRrh; laLFkk gS ftlesa vusdksa deZpkfj;ksa o vf/kdkfj;ksa dh fu;qfDr gsrq ,d fuf'pr izfdz;k gS ,oa fu;qfDr gsrq mDr izfdz;k dks iw.kZ djds gh p;fur O;fDr dks fu;qfDr iznku dh tkrh gSA deZpkjh dks ukSdjh ls lsokeqDr fd;s tkus dh Hkh ,d fuf'pr izfdz;k gS ftlds rgr fyf[kr vkns'k ls ghs c[kkZLr fd;k tkrk gS ekSf[kd vkns'k ls ugh A vizkFkhZx.k ds ;gka pkj gtkj :i;s ds osru ij dk;Z djus dk dksbZ in vFkok osru J`a[kyk gh l`ftr ugh gS A vizkFkhZ la- 2 ds ;gka dHkh fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ fu;qfDr gh ugh gksus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks fdlh izdkj dh lsok ls fn-31-12-15 dks gVkus dk iz'u gh iSnk ugh gksrk gS izkFkhZ ds Lo;a ds dFku ls Li"V gS fd og Lo;a dks nSfud osru ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djrs jgus ds vk/kkj ij LFkk;h fu;qfDr ysus dk iz;kl dj jgk gS A cSad esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh fu;qfDr nsus@gVkus dk vf/kdkj 'kk[kk Lrj ds vf/kdkjh dks ugh gS os dsoy izfrfnu ds vk/kkj ij dqN le;@?kaVs ds tks iwoZ r;'kqnk etnwjh ij fdlh O;fDr dh vko';drkuqlkj dHkh Hkh j[k ldrs gS LFkk;h :i ls fu;qfDr nsus vFkok nSfud osru ds vk/kkj ij Hkh fu;qfDr nsus dk vf/kdkj 'kk[kk izca/kd dks ugh gksrk gS A izkFkhZ }kjk M~;wVh 'kCn dk iz;ksx dj Lo;a dks fu;fer deZpkjh fn[kkus dk iz;kl fd;k gSA cSad esa dk;Zjr lHkh deZpkfj;ksa o vf/kdkfj;ksa dh mifLFkfr ,d fu/kkZfjr izksQkekZ gktjh jftLVj esa ntZ dhs tkrhs gS uk fd lkns jftLVj esa A cSad deZpkfj;ksa dks osru dk Hkqxrku tfj;s okmpj ughs fd;k tkrk ysfdu 'kk[kk esa vkdfLed dk;Z dh etnwjh ds fy;s okmpj ds tfj;s gh Hkqxrku djus dh O;oLFkk gS A cSad ,d foRrh; laLFkk gksus ds dkj.k cSad esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dk Hkqxrku djus ;k fdlh vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s etnwjh dk Hkqxrku cSad }kjk okmpj bR;kfn cukdj gh fu;ekuqlkj fd;k tkrk gS ftlls ikjfn'kZrk ,oa foRrh; vuq'kklu cuk jgs A cSad esa lQkbZ djus Vsscy dh lQkbZ djus] >kMw yxkus ds fy, igys ls gh fu;qDr LFkkbZ deZpkjh }kjk gh laikfnr dh tkrh gS A cSad ds egRoiw.kZ okmpj dhs ckbafMax o mUgsa b/kj m/kj ys tkus ckcr~ fu;qDr nQ~rjh }kjk fd;k tkrk gSA Mkd ykus o ys tkus dk dk;Z cSad }kjk dkQh le; iwoZ gh iksLV vkWfQl ls djkuk can djk fn;k gS A lkjh Mkd dwfj;j daiuh ds }kjk o ;fn dksbZ Mkd vk;h gks rks og iksLVeSu ds }kjk gh lh/ks lacaf/kr deZpkjh o vf/kdkjh dks lqiqnZ dh tkrh gS A cSad esa lHkh izdkj ds Hkqxrku fcy ds vk/kkj ij gh fd;s tkus dh O;oLFkk gS A fcy ds lkFk fdlh izdkj dh dsokbZlh ugh fy;k tkrk gS A cSad esa fo'ks"k mRloksa ij usxksf'k;scy baLVz~wesaV ,DV ds vk/kkj ij vodk'k ?kksf"kr gksrk gS A vr% cSad esa dksbZ dk;Z ughs gksus ds dkj.k cSad ugh [kksyk tkrk gS A ;fn946 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] fdlh dkj.k ls fdlhs vf/kdkjh ;k fyfid oxS- dks cqyk;k tkrk gS rks mUgsa vykmal@{kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku cSad }kjk fu;ekuqlkj fd;k tkrk gS A lqj{kk@vR;ko';d dkj.kksa ls cqyk;s x;s deZpkjh@vf/kdkfj;ksa ds vykok vU; lHkh yksxksa dk cSad esa izos'k fu"ks/k gksrk gS A izkFkhZ dhs cSad esa fdlh izdkj ls dksbZ fu;qfDr gh ughs gqbZ vr% voS/k rjhds vFkok ekSf[kd vkn'kksa ls lsok lekIr djus dh dksbZ fLFkfr gh iSnk ugh gksrh A izkFkhZ dsoy o dsoy ,d [kqyk etnwj ds rgr o r;'kqnk etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij dqN ?kaVksa ds fy;s gh cSad us j[kk Fkk izkFkhZ ij cSafdax vf/kfu;e o dsanzh; vkS|ksfxd deZdkjh vf/kfu;e ds fu;e ykxw ugh gksus ls izkFkhZ fdlh Hkh izdkj dk ykHk cSad ls ikus dk gdnkj ugh gS A izkFkhZ cSad esa dHkh fu;ksftr ugh gqvk A izkFkhZ o cSad ds e/; dHkh Hkh dkexkj o fu;sktd dk laca/k LFkkfir ugh gqvk ,oa uk gh dsanzh; deZpkjh vf/kfu;e ds rgr dHkh ykHk iznRr fd;k x;k izkFkhZ dks dsoy r;'kqnk etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij fy;k x;k A etnwj gh jgk cSad dk LFkk;h vLFkk;h deZpkjh ugh A izkFkhZ dsoy vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s gh vko';drkuqlkj cqyk;k x;k o mls r;'kqnk etnwjh iznku dh x;h A cSad }kjk izkFkhZ dks yxkrkj etnwjh ij ugh fy;k A izkFkhZ dks dsoy vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy, gh dHkh&dHkkj cqyk;k x;k A mldk dk;Z lekIr gksus ij mls r;'kqnk etnwjh dk Hkqxrku dj fn;k tkrk Fkk A izkFkhZ cSad esa LFkk;h ;k vLFkk;h vk/kkj ij fu;qDr ughs fd;k vr% izkFkhZ dks dkj.k crkvks uksfVl] NaVuh eqvkotk nsus dk iz'u gh iSnk ugh gksrk gS A uksfVl o NaVuh eqvkots dk izko/kku dsoy cSad ds deZpkfj;ksa ij gh ykxw gksrk gS A vdkfLed dk;Z ds fy;s etnwj tks fd vk';drkuqlkj cqyk;s tkrs gS ml ij vkbZ Mh ,DV ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS A vr% vkbZ Mh ,DV dh /kkjk 25 ,Q th ,p izkFkhZ ij ykxw ugh gksrh vkSj bu izko/kkuksa dk fdlh izdkj dk mYya?ku vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ughs fd;k x;k gS vkdfLed dk;Z [kRe gksus ds ckn izkFkhZ dk cSad ds lkFk deZpkjh fu;ksDrk dk dHkh dksbZ laca/k ugh jgk A vr% lsok lekfIr dk xyr voS/k o xSj dkuwuh gksus dk dksbZ iz'u gh iSnk ugh gksrk gS A izkFkhZ dk dk;Z o le; ,oa vof/k fuf'pr ugh Fkh ,oa dk;Z lekfIr ds ckn og vU;= dk;Z djus ds fy, Lora= gS tks fdlh Hkh izdkj ds vuQs;j yscj izSfDVl dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh vkrk gS A izkFkhZ ds izfr fdlh Hkh izdkj dk dksbZ uk rks lkSrsyk O;ogkj fd;k u gh izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)karksa dk mYa?ku fd;k A izkFkhZ >wBs vkjksi cSad ij vf/kjksfir dj vkdfLed dk;Z dk cnuh;rh ls etnwjh dk nksgjk ykHk ysuk pkgk jgk gS tks U;k;laxr ugh gS A izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ la-2 laLFkku@cSad esa dHkh Hkh fu;ksftr ugh jgk A bl dkj.k izkFkhZ o cSad ds e/; dkexkj o fu;kstd dk laca/k ugh cuk ,oa fj'rk LFkkfir ugh gksus ds dkj.k dksbZ fookn vFkok vkS|ksfxd fookn u rks fo|eku gS vkSj uk gh fookn gksus dk vans'kk gS A izkFkhZ dk ;g izkFkZuk i= varZxr /kkjk 10]11 o 12 vkbZ Mh ,DV dh ifjf/k esa ugh vkus ds dkj.k fo:) vizkFkhZ fujLruh; gS A ifCyd ,aiykW;esaV fcuk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 14 o 16 dh ikyuk fd;s cxSj drbZ laHko ughs gS fo'ks"k dj jk"Vz~h;d`r cSad esa rks drbZ gh laHko ugh gS A izkFkhZ dsoy nSfud etnwjh ij vkdfLed dk;Z djus] r;'kqnk etnjh izkIr dj vizkFkhZ cSad laLFkku esa fu;skftr gksus dk nkok ugh dj ldrk gS ,oa u gh og fdlh fo'ks"k vuqrks"k ikus dk gdnkj gS A izkFkhZ ;sudsu izdkjs.k fiNys njokts ls cSad esa fu;qfDr gsrq izos'k djuk pkg jgk gS tks u dsoy mu yksxksa ds fgrksa ij dqBkjk?kkr gksxk tks p;u izfdz;k ds rgr cSad esa fuq;Dr gq, gS cfYd cSdMksj ,aVz~h dks ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us Hkh vius vusd fu.kZ;ksa esa mYysf[kr fd;k gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gS A

3- U;k;ky; }kjk mHk;i{k ds ijLij fojks/kh vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij fn-4-4-2018 dks fuEukafdr fook|d dk;e fd;s x;s%&

1- vk;k izkFkhZ us viuh fu;qfDr fn- 2-2-2011 ls lsokeqfDr fn-31-12-2015 ds iwoZ rd vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu pkj gtkj :i;s izfrekg ds osru ij nQ~rjh e; lQkbZ deZpkjh ds in ij vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk ij ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z yxkrkj ,oa fu;fer :i ls fd;k gS \

2- vk;k vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dks fn-31-12-2015 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q th ,oa ,p ds mYya?ku esa vuqfpr Je O;ogkj dj xyr o voS/k rkSj ij lsokeqDr dj fn;k \

3- vk;k izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS \

4- vuqrks"k \

4- izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls ekSf[kd lk{; esa , Mc-1 dqynhiflag Lo;a izkFkhZ dh lk{; ys[kc) djokrs gq, nLrkosth lk{; esa izn'kZ Mc-1 ls Mc-104 izLrqr dj iznf'kZr djok;s x;s gS rFkk vizkFkhZx.k dh lk{; ds nkSjku vizkFkhZ i{k }kjk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls izLrqr nLrkostksa esa ls izn'kZ Mc-105 yxk;r Mc-131 Hkh iznf'kZr djok;s x;s gS A vizkFkhZ i{k dhs vksj ls ekSf[kd lk{; esa ,u , Mc-1 fot;nhi dqekor 'kk[kk izca/kd dh lk{; ys[kc) djok;h tkrs gq, nLrkost izn'kZ ,e&1 yxk;r ,e&4 izLrqr dj iznf'kZr djok;s x;s gS A

5- cgl vafre lquh x;h A fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ ds vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds nksgjko ds lkFk rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ dhs ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa mlds }kjk iznf'kZr nLrksoth lk{; ls izkFkhZ dk vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu vizkFkhZ la- 2 dh 'kk[kk esa izkFkhZ ds vfHkopukuqlkj vof/k esa mlds vfHkopuksa esa of.kZr dk;Z yxkrkj djuk lkfcr gksrk gS A mlds izR;sd o"kZ esa 240 fnol iwjs gksrs gS A Lo;a vizkFkhZ lk{kh }kjk Hkh izkFkhZ dk dk;Z izR;{k o vizR;{k :i ls Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS o vf/kdrj iz'uksa ij og ,d rjg ls fu:Rrj gh jgk gS A Lo;a vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr nLrkost Hkh izkFkhZ ds ekeys dh iqf"V djrs gS A izkFkhZ dks va'kdkfyd Jfed crk;k x;k gS fdarq mlls iw.kZ dky rd dk;Z fy;k tkrk Fkk og va'kdkfyd Jfed Fkk rks Hkh og vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l ds rgr Jfed dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gS A mls vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls nSfud osru Hkksxh crk;k x;k gS A blls Hkh izkFkhZ ds ekeys ij dksbZ foijhr vlj ugh iMrk gS A vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ckotwn U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa ds iwjs okmpj is'k ugh fd;s x;s A muds fo:) mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS D;ksafd 'kiFk i= Hkh is'k ugh fd;k x;k fd vU; okmpj miyC/k ugh gS A o"kZ 2011 ds mifLFkfr jftLVj ds ckjs esa igys vizkFkhZ lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 fot;nhi }kjk mlds [kksus dh lk{; nh x;h fQj947 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 [kqn us gh feyus dh lk{; nh A blds laca/k esa izkFkhZ ij yxk;s x;s vkjksi fujk/kkj gS A vizkFkhZx.k dk ekeyk ;g ugh gS fd izkFkhZ dks dksbZ uksfVl o NaVuh HkRrk fn;k tkdj lsokeqDr fd;k x;k gks A mlds LFkku ij vU; Jfed j[kk tkuk Hkh fl) gS ,sls esa izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,Q th ,p ds mYay?ku esa gS tks Jfed cSadksa esa 180 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z dj ysrs gS og LFkkbZdj.k ds ik= gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse Lohdkj fd;k tkdj ekaxk x;k vuqrks"k iznku fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A vius rdksZ ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar Hkh izLrqr fd;s x;s gS%&

1- 2011 ySc vkbZ lh 2799 nsfoanj flag cuke E;qfufliy dkmafly] lukSj]

2- 2018 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 117 ¼NRrhlx<½ f'koiwtu dqekj cuke LVsV vkWQ NRrhlx<]

3- 2018 ySc vkbZ lh 2115 LVsV vkWQ mRrjk[kaM o vu; cuke d`".kiky]

4- 2009 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 1264 ¼bykgkckn½ iatkc us'kuy cSad , QkbZusaf'k;y vaMjVsfdax o vU; cuke ;wfu;u vkWQ bafM;k o vU;]

5- 2005 ySc vkbZ lh 3750 us'kuy Leky baM0 dkWjiksjs'ku fy0 cuke nh ih vks] 1 ,Mh'kuy yscj dksVZ] enzkl o vU; A

6- [kaMu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vizkFkhZx.k ds vius tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds rF;ksa ds nksgjko ds lkFk rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ o vizkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;ksftr o fu;kstd ds laca/k fl) ugh gS u gh izkFkhZ vizkFkhZx.k dk Jfed fl) gS A ekeyk izkFkhZ dks lkfcr djuk Fkk rFkk mldh lk{; fo'oluh; ugh gS A vizkFkhZ lk{kh us izkFkhZ dh fLFkfr Li"V dh gS A og vko';drk ds vk/kkj ij gh dHkh&dHkkj dk;Z ij j[kk tkrk Fkk tks dk;Z mldk tokc LVsVesaV esa of.kZrkuqlkj lhfer Fkk A ml ij vkbZ Mh ,DV ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS rFkk izkFkhZ Jfed dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh vkrk gS A cSadksa esa HkrhZ fof/k izfdz;k vuqlkj gksrhs gS ;fn LFkkuh; eSustj }kjk mls dqNsd vof/k ds fy,s dqN pan ?kaVksa dk dk;Z djok Hkh fy;k x;k gS rks mlls vf/kdkj iSnk ugh gksrs gS A ;s lc rF; tks vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls j[ks x;s gS i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ls fl) gS A Lo;a izkFkhZ }kjk viuh lk{; esa fu;qfDr i= ugh nsuk] LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks osru fHkUu izdkj ls fn;k tkuk o Lo;a }kjk HkrhZ izfdz;k ds rgr fu;qfDr dh dk;Zokgh ugh djuk vius 'kCnksa esa Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS A o"kZ 2011 dk vly mifLFkfr jftLVj fn[kkrs gq, mldh vk[kjh ykbu fHkUu iSu ls gksuk o dbZ txg eSustj ds gLrk{kjksa ds mij izkFkhZ }kjk ckn esa djuk crkrs gq, bls izkFkhZ dh tkylkth crk;k x;k gS ,oa ;g Hkh rdZ fn;s x;s gS fd cSad ds ikl tks okmpj Fks is'k dj fn;s x;s gS A 'ks"k Fks gh ughA tks Fks mUgsa cSad ugh jksd ldrk A okmpj jksduk ;fn izkFkhZ ekurk gS rks mlus vkifRr dh gksrh A izkFkhZ fdlh Hkh izdkj ls fdlh Hkh vuqrks"k dk ik= ugh gS A mldk LVsVesaV vkQ Dyse >wBs rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr gS A mlus ekfld osru crk;k gS tcfd ftjg dh lk{; esa og izfr fnol ds fglkc ls okmpj }kjk osru izkIr djuk Lohdkj djrk gS ftlls mlds ekeys dh iksy [kqy tkrh gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kfkjt djus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A

7- mHk;i{kdkjku~ dh vksj ls fn;s x;s rdksZ ds en~ns utj rFkk izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ds vfHkerksa ds n`f"Vxr lacaf/kr fof/k dks fopkj esa ysrs gq, i=koyh dk Hkyh&Hkkafr ifj'khyu fd;k x;k A

8- izkFkhZ lk{kh , Mc-1 dqynhiflag }kjk }kjk viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds rF;ksa dks gh ntZ djok;k x;k gS ftjg dh lk{; esa lk{; nh gS fd izn'kZ Mc-4 o 5 czkap eSustj }kjk fdarq fdlds }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k mlds gLrk{kj ugh gS A ;g lgh gS fd ljdkjh dk;kZy;] cSad vkfn esa fu;qfDr ls iwoZ osasdsalh tkjh gksrhs gS A ukSdjh ds fy, vf/kdkjh] deZpkjh vFkok pijklh dks Hkh vkosnu djuk iMrk gS A eSusa ukSdjh ds fy;s vkosnu is'k ugh fd;k A vt[kqn dgk fd esjk ekSf[kd baVjO;w fy;k gS A eq>s tkudkjh ugh gS fd eSustj ds }kjk fdlh dks ukSdjh ij j[kus dk vf/kdkj gS vFkok ugh A eq>s fu;qfDr i= ugh fn;k ekSf[kd vkns'k ls j[kk Fkk A egsanz ewykuh us lkQ lQkbZ djus o nQ~rjh ds fy;s cqyk;k Fkk A eSus ch , fd;k gqvk gS A cSad us dksbZ fyf[kr i= fu;qfDr ds ckjs esa eq>s ughs fn;k vkSj uk gh eSusa is'k fd;k gS A ;g lghs gS fd eSusa vius Dyse esa fdl vf/kdkjh us fdl osrueku ij j[kk ;g ugh fy[kk gS A ;g lgh gS fd ftl izdkj ls fu;qfDr dh izfdz;k gksrhs gS mlh izdkj cSad ds deZpkjh vf/kdkjh vFkok pijklh dks gVkus dh Hkh fuf'pr izfdz;k gksrhs gS A vf/kdkjh] deZpkjh ,oa pijklh dks fyf[kr vkns'k ls gh lsok esa c[kkZLr fd;k tk ldrk gSA eq>s cSad ds osrueku dh tkudkjh ugh gS ysfdu eq>s pkj gtkj :i;s izfrekg osru fn;k tkrk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd ljdkjh foHkkx esa pkj gtkj :i;s dk osrueku ugh gksrk gS ysfdu cSad lcls igys 3700 vFkok 4200 vkfn ds osru ij j[krh gS A eq>s tkudkjh esa ughs gS fd LFkkuh; vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dqN le; ds fy,s deZpkjh j[kus dk vf/kdkj ek= gS A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eq>s cSad }kjk r;'kqnk etnwjh ij dHkh dHkh dke ds fy, cqykrs gks cfYd czkap eSa gh tkdj [kksyrk Fkk vkSj czkap dks can Hkh eSa gh djrk Fkk A cSad vf/kdkjh deZpkjh mudks osru dSls fn;k tkrk gS ekywe ugh vt[kqn dgk fd osru muds [kkrs esa tek gks tkrk gS A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSusa lkQ lQkbZ dk gh dk;Z fd;k gks tcfd eSusa ,Vh,e eas dS'k Mkyus] pSd fDy;fjax nQ~rjh vkfn dk dk;Z fd;k Fkk A tc cSad deZpkfj;ksa dh NqV~Vh gksrhs Fkh rks gekjh Hkh NqV~Vh gksrhs Fkh fdarq vkfMV ds le; NqV~Vh esa Hkh cqyk ysrs Fks A xzkeh.k bykdk gksus ds dkj.k dksfj;j ls Mkd uk tkdj eSa gh ;g dk;Z djrk Fkk ftldk vyx ls HkRrk eq>s feyrk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd vkus okyh Mkd iksLVeSu gh cSad esa igqapkrk gS A ;g lgh gS fd cSad fcyksa ds vk/kkj ij Hkqxrku djrk gS A ;g lghs gS fd fcy ds lkFk dsokbZlh ugh yh tkrh gS A fcy fcy gh gksrk gS A eSusa gktjh jftLVj 2011 ls 2012 rd is'k fd;k gS A 2012 ds ckn nwljk jftLVj lkns dkxt ij cuk fy;k Fkk ftl ij nLr[kr ugh gksrs Fks A czkap eSustj tks ckn esa vk;s Fks mUgksusa u;k jftLVj Myok fn;k ftl ij esjs nLr[kr ughs gksrs Fks A eSusa czkap ls fjdkMZ ekaxk gh ugh A igys jft0 ij czkap eSustj lkgc nLr[kr djokrs Fks A czkap eSustj eq>ls jftLVj ekaxokrs Fks D;ksafd czkap ds lkjs nLrkostkr~ ,oa gktjh jftLVj vkfn esjs gh ikl jgrs Fks A pkchs czkap eSustj ds ikl jgrh Fkh A og vkdj eq>s948 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] pkch nsrs Fks mlds ckn eSa mUgsa jftLVj fudkydj nsrk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd nwljs czkap eSustj u;k jftLVj Mkyk rc eSusa ml jftLVj esa gktjh djus dks ughs cksyk ;g dguk xyr gS fd gktjh jftLVj pksjh gks x;k gks mlds ckn nwljk jftLVj Mkyk x;k A gj lky u;k jftLVj Myrk gS A fQj dgk fd jftLVj Hkjus ds ckn nwljk jftLVj cuk nsrs Fks A u;s jftLVj esa nLr[kr ugh Mkyus ij vkus eSustj lkgc ls lkbu djus ds fy, ugh dgk A ;g ckr lgh gS fd jftLVj essa uhps uhps gh esjs uke o gLrk{kj gS A ;g dguk lgh gS fd gktjh jftLVj esa esjs uke okyh ,d gh jkbfVax gS A ;g dguk xyr gS fd jftLVj eSa vius ?kj ys x;k gwa vkSj viuk uke fy[kdj nLr[kr fd;s gks A ;g dguk xyr gS fd igys okys eSustj us gLrk{kj djus ds fy, ughs cksyk gks cfYd eSusa muds funsZ'kkuqlkj gh jftLVj ij nLr[kr fd;s Fks A izn'kZ Mc-6 }kjk esjs i= fy[kus ds ckn okmpj }kjk esjk osru dk Hkqxrku gksrk Fkk A eSusa cSad esa tks dk;Z fd;k ml dk;Z ds Hkqxrku ds fy;s eSusa cSad dks i= fn;k A ;g lghs gS fd esjs }kjk izkFkZuk i= cSad 'kk[kk esa lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z djus ds fy;s fn;k Fkk A ;g lghs gS fd izn'kZ&6 esa eSusa lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z djus okyh gh ckr fy[kh gS vkSj mldk Hkqxrku fnykus ckcr~ dFku vafdr fd;s x;s gS A ;g lgh gS fd izn'kZ&6 o Mc-8 ,d gh nLrkostkr~ gS A izn'kZ Mc-8 ij fdlh ds gLrk{kj ughs gS dsoy esjk uke gS A ;g lgh gS fd ftu deZpkfj;ksa dks cqyk;k tkrk gS mudk izn'kZ&7 eheks ds vuqlkj Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk gS A izn'kZ&8 esa Hkh lkQ lQkbZ dk gh dk;Z fy[kk gS A ;g lgh gS fd lkQ lQkbZ ds dke esa nQ~rjh dk dk;Z ugh gksrk gSA vt[kqn dgk fd okLro esa nQ~rjh dk dke ysrs Fks A lkQ lQkbZ djus esa nks s nQ~rjh dk dk;Z Hkh ysrs Fks A ;g dguk xyr gS fd lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z djus okyk nQ~rjh dk dk;Z ugh djrk gks A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSa cSad esa dHkh fu;ksftr ugh gqvk gwa A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eq>s r;'kqnk lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z gh cSad us djok;k gks A ukSdjh ls gVkus dk dkj.k iwNk tks eq>s vkt rd ughs crk;k x;k eSa ,th,e lkgc ls feyrk vkSj dgk fd ge rhu txg fu;qfDr [kksy jgs gS rchth] [kjok vkSj QkW;lkxcj esa ls fdlh ,d txg vkidks yxk nsaxs ysfdu vkt rd eq>s fdlh Hkhs cSad esa okil ugh yxk;k vkSj vius pgsrs dks ns[k fy;k A ,th,e ds pkyd dh iRuh dks j[k fy;k A ,l ch ch ts fd'kux< esa eksgu iztkir dks mldh vkbZ Mh esa cnyko djds j[k fy;k tcfd og VkbZe ckMZ gks pqdk Fkk eq>s gVkus ds ckn ekSf[kd vkns'k ls iap'khy vkSj 'kkL=huxj 'kk[kk esa yxk;k tgka ,d ,d ekg gh dke fd;k FkkA izn'kZ Mc-11]14]18]21]22]26]29]31]34]35 ij fdlh ds Hkh gLrk{kj ugh gS ;g lgh gS A izn'kZ 32]33 esa tks fy[kk gS og lgh fy[kk gS A

9- vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls vk;s lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 fot;nhi dqekor 'kk[kk izca/kd }kjk viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa vizkFkhZx.k ds vfHkopukuqlkj gh lk{; ntZ djok;h x;h gS rFkk ftjg dh lk{; esa mlus lk{; nh gS fd eSa vjkabZ 'kk[kk esa 4-9-17 ls dk;Zjr gwa A ;g lgh gS fd p;u izfdz;k ds le; cSad esa vf/kdkjh] deZpkjh fivksu vkfn dh ds okbZ lh ysuk t:jh gksrk gS A 2014 esa vjkabZ 'kk[kk esa izca/kd dkSu ugh crk ldrk gwa fdarq jftLVj ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa A izn'kZ Mc-6 esa fdl cSad vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj gS ughs crk ldrk gwa D;ksafd ;g gLrk{kj gS ;k ugh D;ksafd ,l ,l uacj ls osfjQkbZ djds gh gLrk{kj ds ckn esa crk;k tk ldrk gS A izn'kZ Mc-10]12]16]19]23]32]33 esa , ls ch fdl vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj ughs crk ldrk Lor% dgk fd blesa ,l ,l uacj ughs gS vkSj ,l ,l uacj dks flLVe esa osfjQkbZ dus ds ckn gh crk;k tk ldrk gS fd fdl vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj gS ,l ,l uacj gekjh cSad ds flLVe vuqlkj cSad vf/kdkfj;ksa dks vyksV fd;s tkrs gS A cSad vf/kdkjh fnu Hkj vius gLrk{kj djrs gS mlesa ,l ,l dksM uacj ughs fy[krs gS tgka t:jr gksrhs gS ogka fy[krs gS vkSj tgka t:jr ugh gksrh gS ogka ughs fy[krs gS A gekjh cSad esa Qjojh 2011 ls fnlacj 2015 rd ds izfrfnu ds okmpj miyC/k gS A eSa Qjojh 2011 ls fnlacj 2015 rd ds okmpj is'k dj ldrk gwa ;g lgh gS fd Qjojh 2011 ls fnlacj 2015 rd dk gtkjh jftLVj miyC/k gS Lor% dgk fd 2011&12 dk jftLVj xqe gS A eSa ml le; cSad esa ugh Fkk vkSj tSls gh eq>s irk pyk eSaus eq[;ky; dks lwfpr dj fn;k gS A eq[;ky; dks vizSy 2018 esa lwfpr fd;k gSA eSusa pktZ ysrs le; iwoZ ds 'kk[kk izca/kd ls jftLVj xqe gksus ckcr~ dkbZ tkudkjh ugh yh Fkh A eSusa bl dsl esa psd fd;k rks Kkr gqvk fd foRrh; o"kZ 2011&12 dk jftLVj miyC/k ugh gS A izn'kZ Mc-7]13]20]24]28]30]gekjh 'kk[kk ds gS ysfdu bUgsa osfjQkbZ djus ds ckn gh crk ldrk gwa fd blesa dksbZ vYVjs'ku rks ugh gqvk gS izn'kZ Mc-36 dk vly ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa fd ;g gekjh 'kk[kk dk gS ;k ugh A orZeku esa ;g nLrkostkr~ xqe gS A eSa ughs crk ldrk fd dkSuls lu esa xqe gqvk Fkk A Lor% dgk fd esj le; xqe ughs gqvk A gekjh cSad esa Qjojh 2011 ls vkt rd cSad esa lQkbZ djus okys ds laca/k esa fuosnu gS fd Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd dksbZ Hkh LFkkbZ lQkbZ deZpkjh ughs Fkk A blds fy;s tks nSfud vk/kkj ij vyx vyx O;fDr vkrs Fks ftUgsa izfrnfu dh nj ls Hkqxrku dj fn;k tkrk Fk A gktjh jft0 ds vuqlkj uoacj 2015 ls izsepan esgrj ftldk ih ,Q ua-54803 gS tks cSad ds LFkkbZ deZpkjh dks vyksV fd;k tkrk gS og eSa fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa mlds ckn tujy vVsaMsaV ds in ij eksguyky iztkir vk;s vkSj izsepan esgrj dk :iux< LFkkukarj.k gks x;k gS A eksguyky iztkir o izsepan esgrj dh MsV~l cSad dk fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa A eksguyky iztkir dk ih ,Q uacj Hkh cSad dk fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa A ;g LFkkbZ deZpkjh dks vyksV gksrs gS A Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd nSfud osru Hkksxh ds :i esa deZpkfj;ksa us dke fd;k mldk uke fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa A ;g dguk xyr gS fd dqynhi us Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd nSfud osru Hkksxh ds :i esa dk;Z fd;k gksA ftlus Hkh dke fd;k gS og fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa A etZj ls igys lQkbZ deZpkjh vkSj nQ~rjh vyx gksrk Fk A lQkbZ dk dk;Z nSfud osru Hkksxh djrs Fks vkSj nQ~rjh dk dk;Z LFkkbZ deZpkjh gh djrk Fkk vkSj dksbZ ugh djrk FkkA nQ~rjh dk D;k dke gksrk gS ughs crk ldrk gS A cSad dk lafo/kku ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa fd mldk D;k dk;Z gksrk gS A lkekU;r% okmpj flyuk] Dyh;fjax ys tkuk vkSj 'kk[kk ds vU; dk;Z LFkkbZ nQ~rjh ls djokrs gS A Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2011949 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 rd LFkkbZ nQ~rjh dksbZ ugh Fkk A bl vof/k esa nQ~rjh ugh gksus ls nQ~rjh dk dk;Z cSad ds LFkkbZ deZpkjh djrs Fks tks ml le; iksLVsM Fks Dyh;fjax dk dk;Z Mkd ls Hkstrs Fks A Mkd LFkkbZ deZpkjh iksLV vkfQl esa Mky nsrs FksA Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd cSad dh Mkd dk vkod tkod jft0 gS ;k ugh cSad fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gwa tc eSaus iwoZ esa pktZ fy;k Fkk rc ;g jftLVj Fkk vkSj iwjh fMVsy fjdkMZ ns[kdj crk ldrk gswa ;g dguk xyr gS fd dqynhi Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd lQkbZ dk dke o nQ~rjh nksuksa dk dke djrk gks vxj og dke djrk Fkk rks mls Msyh ostst dk Hkqxrku ?kaVksa ds fglkc ls dj fn;k tkrk Fkk A mDr vof/k esa fdrus :i;s ?kaVksa ds fglkc ls Hkqxrku gksrk Fkk ysfdu vLFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa ds fy, ?kaVksa ds fglkc ls nj fQDl ugh Fkh A nSfud deZpkjh dks 125 ls 150:- izfrfnu ds fglkc ls Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk A izkFkhZ lkQ lQkbZ ds vykok fctyh dk fcy Hkjus o vU; dke dks crkus ij djrk Fkk tks okmpj geus tks is'k fd;s gS muls nf'kZr gksrk gS A geus tks okmpj is'k fd;s gS muesa tks dke crk;k gS izkFkhZ us ogh dke fd;k gS A ;g dguk xyr gS fd geus tks okmpj is'k fd;s mlls izkFkhZ o"kZ 2012 ls 2014 rd yxkrkj dke dj jgk gks Lor% dgk fd og nSfud vk/kkj ij tks dke djrk Fkk mlds vk/kkj ij mldk Hkqxrku dj fn;k tkrk Fkk A ,d 'kk[kk ls nwljh 'kk[kk esa ds'k ykus o ys tkus dk dke tks LFkkbZ deZpkjh Fks og djrs Fks A fu;ekuqlkj vuqcaf/kr xkMh ls tkrs Fks ;k ugh ml le; rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd crk ldrs gS A izn'kZ Mc-105 okmpj ds ckjs esa rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd crk ldrs gS A LFkkbZ nQ~rjh gksrs og cSad ds okmpjksa dh flykbZ dk dke djrs gS A izn'kZ Mc-106 okmpj rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd 'kk[kk gh crk ldrs gS fd mlls okmpj flykbZ dk dke D;ksa djok;k A fookfnr le; esa fcy dks tek djokus dkSu tkrk Fkk A rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd crk ldrs gS A ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ Mc-107 ls Mc-116 okmpj izkFkhZ }kjk VsyhQksu dk fcy tek djokus ckcr~ gS A izn'kZ Mc-117 ij , ls ch fdl cSad vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj gS eSa ughs crk ldrk Lor% dgk fd vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj gS rks flXuspj uacj fy[kk gks rks mls flLVe osfjQkbZ djus ds ckn gh crk ldrs gS fd fdl vf/kdkjh ds lkbZu gS A ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ Mc- 118 ls izn"kZ Mc-131 yho fjdkMZ gS tks cSad LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa ds curs gS ftlesa o"kZ Hkj ds vodk'k dk C;kSjk gksrk gS A izn'kZ Mc-36 ls Mc-104 LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dk gktjh jftLVj gS Lor% dgk fd tks gktjh jftLVj fn[kk og 2011 dk feflax xqe gks x;k Fkk oks vc fey pqdk gS tks ;g jftLVj gksrs gS mlesa 'kk[kk izca/kd ekdZ djrs fd dkSu LFkkbZ deZpkjh gS A feflax jftLVj 'kk[kk dhs LVksj :e esa feyk tks twu 2018 esa feyk ;g ckr lgh gS fd o"kZ 2011 dk gktjh jftLVj izkFkhZ ugh ys x;k Fkk A

10- izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr o iznf'kZr izn'kZ Mc-1 ekuuh; jkt- mPp U;k;ky;] cSap] t;iqj }kjk ,l ch flfoy fjV fiVh'ku la-5265@2017 mUokuh dqynhiflag cuke ,l ch vkbZ oxS- esa fn-4-9-2017 dks ikfjr vkns'k dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi dh izfr gS ftlesa ekuuh; jkt0 mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEu izdkj vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s gS%&

"The petitioners claim that they have been wrongly removed. Admittedly, remedy under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is available.If the petitioners raise a dispute under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, the concerned Labour Court is expected to decide the claim of the petitioner preferably within 9 months thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of with the said observations."

11- izn'kZ Mc-2 izkFkhZ }kjk le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k izLrqr f'kdk;r izkFkZuk i= ,oa izn'kZ Mc-3 mlesa vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk izLrqr tokc dh QksVks izfr gS A ;|fi i=koyh ij izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls le>kSrk vf/kdkjh }kjk varZxr /kkjk 2 , vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds rgr tkjh izek.k i= izLrqr ughs fd;k x;k gS fdarq bl laca/k esa vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls vius vfHkopuksa lk{; o rdksZ esa dskbZ ,rjkt ughs fd;k x;k gS ,sls esa izkFkhZ }kjk mDr izek.k i= is'k ughs fd;k tkuk mis{kk fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS A

fook|d la[;k&1%&

12- mDr fook|d dks fl) djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ ij jgk gS A vius vfHkopuksa ds leku gh izkFkhZ lk{kh , Mc-1 dqynhi flag }kjk izLrqr viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa fu;qfDr fn-2-2-2011 ls mldks gVk;s tkus dh fnukad 31-12-15 rd vizkFkhZ la-2 ds ;gka yxkrkj lk{; lQkbZ okmpj dh QkbZfyax o mUgsa ykus&ys tkus o Mkd vkfn ykus&ys tkus dh lk{; nh x;h gS rFkk ftjg dh lk{; esa bl laca/k esa og fLFkj jgk gS ;+|fi mlus ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mls fu;qfDr i= ugh fn;k x;k Fkk A vizkFkhZ lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 fot;nhi }kjk viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr ls ;|fi badkj fd;k gS fdarq mlds }kjk lkFk gh ;g Hkh lk{; ntZ djok;h x;h gS fd izkFkhZ dks dsoy [kqyh etnwjh ds rgr r;'kqnk etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij dqN ?kaVksa gsrq ghs cSad }kjk j[kk x;k gS og dsoy etnwj gh Fkk deZpkjh ugh Fkk mls vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy, vko';drkuqlkj cqyk;k tkrk Fkk o etnwjh izfrfnu dh tkrhs Fkh mls yxkrkj etnwjh ij ugh j[kk x;k A dk;Z lekIr gksus ij r;'kqnk etnwjh dk Hkqxrku dj fn;k tkrk Fkk A vizkFkhZx.k ds mDr vuqlkj gh vfHkopu jgs gS fdarq vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls vk;k mDr lk{kh viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa o"kZ 2017 ls vius vkidks vizkFkhZ la-2 'kk[kk dk izca/kd crkrk gS rFkk mlus ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd dksbZ LFkkbZ lQkbZ deZpkjh mldh 'kk[kk esa ugh Fkk A 2015 ls vU; O;fDr izsepan bR;kfn vk;s A Qjojh 2011 ls vDVwcj 2015 rd fdu deZpkfj;ksa us nSfud osru Hkksxh ds :i esa dk;Z fd;k og fjdkMZ ns[kdj gh crk ldrk gS A etZj ls igys lQkbZ deZpkjh nSfud osru Hkksxh o nQ~rjh LFkkbZ deZpkjh vyx&vyx gkrs Fks A mlus viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa izkFkhZ dk lQkbZ deZpkjh o nQ~rjh ds :i esa dk;Z djus ls Li"V :i ls euk ugh fd;k gS cfYd ;g dgk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ us dk;Z fd;k rks ?kaVksa ds fglkc ls ostst dk Hkqxrku izkIr fd;k x;k fQj og ?kaVksa ds fglkc ls Hkqxrku ughs crk ik;k gS o izfrfnol ds fglkc ls gh mlus Hkqxrku crk;k gS A i=koyh ij izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls izLrqr o iznf'kZr lQkbZ dk;Z djus ckcr~ Hkqxrku fd;s tkus ds izkFkZuk i= dh izfr izn'kZ Mc-6 ftldk daI;wVj :ikarj.k izn'kZ Mc-8 gS ekg vDVwcj 2014 dk pkj gtkj :i;s dh etnwjh ds Hkqxrku ckcr~ gS ftlds okmpj dh izfr izn'kZ Mc-7 gS A ekg vxLr 2013 ds izkFkZuk i= dh izfr izn'kZ950 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Mc-10 o mlds daI;wVj :ikarj.k dh izfr izn'kZ Mc-11] ekg ekpZ 2014 ls ekg tqykbZ 2014 rd ds izkFkZuk i= ,oa muds daI;wVj :ikarj.k dh izfr izn'kZ Mc-12 yxk;r Mc-30 gS ftuls izkFkhZ dks lQkbZ dk;Z ds fy, vizkFkhZ la-2 cSad }kjk pkj gtkj :i;s dk Hkqxrku fd;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS A izn'kZ Mc-32 ftldh :ikarj.k izfr izn'kZ Mc-34 gS fn-26-2-11 dk ikap fnu ds ikap lkS :i;s dh etnwjh nsus dk izkFkZuk i= rFkk izn'kZ Mc-33 ftldh daI;wVj :ikarj.k dh izfr izn'kZ Mc-35 gS fn-11-6-11 dk nks fnu dh nks lkS :i;s dh etnwjh fy;s tkus dk izkFkZuk i= gS rFkk izn'kZ Mc-117 uoacj 2014 ds rhu gtkj :i;s dh etnwjh Hkqxrku dk izkFkZuk i= gS ftlds daI;wVj :ikarj.k dh izfr izn'kZ Mc-9 gS A blds vykok vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls i=koyh ij U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls ekg tuojh 2013 ls ekg ekpZ 2013] ekg ebZ 2013] ekg tqykbZ 2013 ls ekg fnlacj 2013 rd ds fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ds izkFkZuk i= ,oa okmpj Hkh is'k fd;s x;s gS ftuesa ls T;knkrj esa izkFkhZ dks pkj gtkj :i;s dk Hkqxrku fd;k tkuk of.kZr gS A ;|fi mDr nLrkost mHk;i{kdkjku~ }kjk lk{; ds nkSjku iznf'kZr ugh djok;s x;s gS fdarq tks nLrkost Lo;a vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fd;s x;s gS os vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) i951 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 i= vkns'kkuqlkj izLrqr ughs fd;k x;k gS ,sls esa 'ks"k vof/k ds okmpj ds fy, vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) ;g mi/kkj.kk cus fcuk ughs jgrhs gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk 'ks"k vof/k esa Hkh mDr izdkj dk;Z fd;k x;k A fQj mDr 'ks"k vof/k esa fdl O;fDr us dk;Z fd;k ;g Hkh vizkFkhZ lk{kh Li"V ugh dj ik;k gS A bl izdkj izkFkhZ }kjk of.kZr vof/k esa vizkFkhZx.k ds ;gka vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk esa lkQ&lQkbZ ds vykok nQ~rjh dk dk;Z fujarj djus ckcr~ lk{; izkFkhZ ds i{k esa gS ftlds n`f"Vxr izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls fn;s x;s ;g rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; gS fd izkFkhZ us fn-2-2-11ls mldks fn-31-12-15 dks gVk;s tkus rd lkQ&lQkbZ ds vykok nQ~rjh ds :i esa dk;Z fd;k A mlds ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnol ls vf/kd fnol dk dk;Z djus ls Hkh badkjh ugh dhs tk ldrhs gS rFkk vf/kdrj okmpj ls mldks ekfld Hkqxrku pkj gtkj :i;s dk fd;k x;k gS A ,sls esa mldk osru pkj gtkj :i;s ughs gks] ;g Hkh ugh ekuk tk ldrk gS A bl izdkj mDr fook|d la-1 ds rF;ksa ij lk{; izkFkhZ ds i{k esa gS vr% ;g fook|d la-1 izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k tkrk gS A

13- vc ge fook|d la-3 o rRi'pkr~ fook|d la- 2 o 4 ij fopkj djuk U;k;ksfpr le>rs gS A

fook|d la[;k&3%&

14- bl fook|d dks fl) djus dk Hkkj vizkFkhZx.k ij jgk gS A vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ vkdfLed deZpkjh Fkk ftldks ftruk dk;Z og djrk Fkk mldk Hkqxrku mlds dk;Z ds fglkc ls fd;k tkrk Fkk A vr% mlds ekeys esa vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS rFkk og vizkFkhZx.k dk Jfed ekus tkus ;ksX; ugh gS A blds foijhr izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ ;fn nSfud osruHkksxh vkdfLed Jfed Fkk rks Hkh ml ij vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw gksrs gS A izkFkhZ lk{kh , Mc-1 dqynhi flag }kjk viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa LFkkbZ deZpkjh ds osru dh jhfr ls fHkUu okmpj dh jhfr ls mlds dk;Z dk Hkqxrku gksuk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fadarq Lo;a vizkFkhZx.k ds vfHkopuksa o lk{; vuqlkj og Lohd`r rkSj ls vkdfLed nSfud osruHkksxh O;fDr jgk gS ftlds laca/k esa mDr fook|d la-1 izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS A izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2011 ySc vkbZ lh 2799 nsfoanj flag cuke E;qfufliy dkmafly] lukSj esa ikVZVkbZe] dkaVªSDP;qvy] Vsaijsjh o dStqvy ,aiykW;h dks Hkh vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l ds varZxr Jfed gksuk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS A U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2018 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 117 ¼NRrhlx<½ f'koiwtu dqekj cuke LVsV vkWQ NRrhlx< esa ekuuh; NRrhlx< mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikVZVkbZe fLoij tks fd vLFkkbZ fu;kstu esa Fkk] ds ekeys esa Hkh vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw gksuk vius 'kCnksa esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS A mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ds mDr vfHkerksa ds n`f"Vxr vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fn;s x;s mDr rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; ughs gS rFkk ;g ugh ekuk tk ldrk gS fd izkFkhZ vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l vuqlkj Jfed o vizkFkhZx.k mlds fu;sktu rFkk izkFkhZ o vizkFkhZx.k esa fu;ksftr o fu;kstd ds laca/k ekus tkus ;ksX; ughs gks rFkk gLrxr izdj.k esa vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gks A QyLo:i mDr fook|d vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fofu'pr fd;k tkrk gS A

fook|d la[;k&2%&

15- mDr fook|d dks fl) djkus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ ij jgk gS A fook|d la-1 izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS rFkk fook|d la-3 vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZx.k dk Jfed vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l ds rgr ekuk x;k gS A izkFkhZ dks fn-31-12-15 dks gVk;s tkus ls iwoZ dksbZ NaVuh HkRrk ;k uksfVl fn;s tkus dk rF; vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fdlh Hkh izdkj ls ugh j[kk x;k gS A izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2005 ySc vkbZ lh 3750 us'kuy Leky baM0 dkWjiksjs'ku fy0 cuke nh ih vks] 1 ,Mh'kuy yscj dksVZ] enzkl o vU; esa ekuuh; enzkl mPp U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ,oa 2 ,l ds n`f"Vxr vkdfLed deZpkjh o fu;fer deZpkjh ds e/; dksbZ foHksn ugh gS rFkk vkdfLed deZpkjh Hkh ;fn gVk;k tkrk gS Rkks og /kkjk 25 ,Q ds izko/kkuksa dk Qk;nk ysus dk ik= gS A ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fn;s x;s ;g rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; gS fd izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ds mYya?ku esa gksuk fl) gS A tgka rd /kkjk 25 th ,oa ,p dk iz'u gS] izkFkhZ ds ckn esa fdu O;fDr;ksa dks fujarj lsok esa j[kk x;k tks Hkh izkFkhZ ds leku gh fLFkfr esa Fks ,sls izkFkhZ ds vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa Li"V vfHkopu ughs gS ;|fi ftjg dh lk{; esa mlus bl lacaa/k esa dqN O;fDr;ksa ds uke fxuk;s gS fdarq mldh eq[; lk{; esa ,slk dksbZ Li"V rF; ughs gS ,sls esa /kkjk 25 th o ,p vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dk mYya?ku izkFkhZ fl) ugh dj ik;k gS A /kkjk 25 ,Q vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds mYya?ku esa vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dhs x;h lsokeqfDr voS/k] vuqfpr o xyr ekus tkus ;ksX; gS vr% mDr fook|d la-2 izkFkhZ ds i{k esa mDrkuqlkj gh vkaf'kd :i ls fofu'pr fd;k tkrk gS A

fook|d la[;k&4 vuqrsk"k%&

16- mDr fook|d vuqrks"k ds ckjs esa gS A fook|d la-1 izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS rFkk fook|d la- 2 esa izkFkhZ dh vizkFkhZx.k }kjk dh x;h lsokeqfDr vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ds mYya?ku esa voS/k] vuqpfr o xyr ekuh x;h gS A fook|d la-3 vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS A izkFkhZ }kjk vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ;g vfHkopu ugh fd;s x;s gS fd og viuh lsokeqfDr ds i'pkr~ ykHkizn fu;kstu esa ughs jgk gS o csjkstxkj jgk gS u gh mldh ,slh dksbZ lk{; gS A mlus viuk osru izfrekg pkj gtkj :i;s crk;k gS mldh dk;Z vof/k fn-2-2-11 ls 31-12-15 rd dh jghs gS A mDr foospukuqlkj og vkdfLed nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfed jgk gS A mldk fu;kstu HkrhZ izfdz;k ls Hkh ugh gS ftu leLr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds en~ns utj izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZx.k dh lsok esa iwoZ osru ifjykHk lfgr iquZLFkkiuk ds ctk; :i;s 952 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] vkns'k

17- vr% izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse fo:) vizkFkhZx.k mDr izdkj Lohdkj fd;k tkdj izkFkhZ dh vizkFkhZx.k }kjk fn- 31-12-15 dks dh x;h lsokeqfDr voS/k o 'kwU; ?kksf"kr fd;s tkrs gq, izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZx.k dh lsok esa iwoZ osru ifjykHk lfgr iquZLFkkiuk ds ctk; vizkFkhZx.k ls ,deq'r {kfriwfrZ Lo:i #- 2]50]000@& vadbZ :i;s

18- vokMZ fy[kk;k tkdj vkt fnukad 08-8-2018 dks [kqys U;k;ky; gLrk{kj dj lquk;k x;kA vokMZ dh izfr fu;ekuqlkj dsanzh; ljdkj dks okLrs xtV esa izdk'ku izsf"kr dh tkos A

,l- ,u- Vsyj] U;k;k/kh'k

ubZ fnYyh] 20 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 305-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vtesj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 01@18½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1½]

Ckh- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo]

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2019

S.O. 305.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 01/18) of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ajmer as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No.L-12025/01/2019-IR(B-I)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

vuqca/k

Je U;k;ky; ,oa vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] vtesj

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh&Jh ,l-,u-Vsyj] vkj-,p-ts-,l

izdj.k la[;k& lh vkbZ Vh vkj 01@18 lh vkbZ ,l ua- lh vkbZ Vh vkj 01@2018

jkeizlkn iq= Jh gaxkehyky fuoklh lh&1@4]

nkrkuxj] tfV;k fgYl] jsacqy jksM] vtesj

---izkFkhZ

cuke

1- egkizca/kd Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad t;iqj gSM vkWfQl fryd ekxZ] lh Ldhe] t;iqj

2- 'kk[kk izca/kd Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad 'kk[kk 'kkL=huxj] vtesj

---vizkFkhZx.k

mifLFkfr

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % Jh jkts'k [kUuk] vf/koDrk

vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls % Jh ,l ds lsBh] vf/koDrk953 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 vokMZ

fnukad 09-8-2018

1- izkFkhZ dqynhi us vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) viuk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse fn-2-1-2018 dks izLrqr dj mlesa vfHkopu fd;s gS fd mldh fu;qfDr vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu fn-7-6-2010 dks nQ~rjh e; lQkbZ deZpkjh ds in ij gqbZ A vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu esgur] bZekunkjh o yxu ls vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk esa dk;Z fd;k gS A vizkFkhZ la-2 us izkFkhZ dks fn-21-11-16 dks ekSf[kd vkns'kksa ls gVk fn;k A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izfrfnu izkFkhZ dh ,d lkns jftLVj esa gktjh yh tkrh FkhA vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izkFkhZ ls izfrfnu cSad dh lQkbZ djokuk] VscYl dh lQkbZ djokuk] >kMw yxokuk okmpjksa dh QkbZfyax djokuk o okmpjksa dks b/kj ls m/kj ykuk ys tkuk o nwljh 'kk[kkvksa ls nwljs cSadksa ls okmpjksa dks fHktokuk o eaxokuk o Mkd ykuk o ys tkuk vkfn dk;Z djok;s tkrs Fks A vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ ls ,d izek.k i= ds okbZ lh dk tkjh dj j[kk Fkk A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izkFkhZ ls izR;sd ekg Hkqxrku gsrq ,d izkFkZuk i= fy;k tkrk Fkk vkSj ml izkFkZuk i= ij izkFkhZ dks tfj;s okmpj ds izR;sd ekg Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds }kjk izkFkhZ ls fo'ks"k mRloksa ij Hkh dk;Z djok;k tkrk Fkk A izkFkhZ us ,d o"kZ esa rFkk ckjg ekg esa yxkrkj fu;fer :i ls 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z fd;k gS tcfd cSafdax vf/kfu;e 180 fnu yxkrkj fu;fer :i ls ftl deZpkjh us lsok;sas iwjh dh gS og LFkk;h gksus dk vf/kdkjh gks pqdk gksrk gS A vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr djus ls iwoZ izkFkhZ dks dksbZ dkj.k ughs crk;k dksbZ uskfVl ughs fn;k dksbZ NaVuh dk uksfVl o NaVuh eqvkotk ughs fn;k vkbZ Mh ,DV dh /kkjk 25 ,Q th ,p dk rFkk Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 14 o 16 dk [kqYye [kqYyk mYya?ku djds izkFkhZ dh lsok;sa xyr voS/k o xSj dkuwuh :i ls lekIr dh gS A izkFkhZ dk dk;Z yxkrkj fu;fer izd`fr dk Fkk A vizkFkhZx.k dk ;g d`R; vuQs;j yscj izSfDVl dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gS A vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ ds lkFk lkSrsyk O;ogkj djrs gq, izkd`frd o uSlfxZd U;k; ds fl)karksa dk mYya?ku fd;k gS A izkFkhZ us ekuuh; jkt0 mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds le{k viuh ,l ch flfoy fjV ;kfpdk la- 5265@2017 dqynhiflag o vU; cuke LVsV cSad vkWQ chdkusj ,aM t;iqj dh is'k dh ftl ij ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj us fn-4-9-2017 dks viuk vkns'k ikfjr djrs gq, izkFkhZ dhs mDr ;kfpdk dks okil ykSVk fn;k vkSj vkbZ Mh ,DV ds varZxr is'k djus gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k vkSj ;g Hkh funsZ'k tkjh fd;s fd Je U;k;ky; izkFkhZ ds mDr izdj.k ds ukS ekg esa fuf.kZr djs A izkFkhZ us fn-20-9-2017 dks le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k viuh f'kdk;r is'k dh vizkFkhZx.k us viuk tokc le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds ;gka is'k fd;k nksuksa i{kksa dh okrkZ djok;h tks vlQy ?kksf"kr gqbZ ftl ij le>kSrk vf/kdkjh us izkFkhZ dks /kkjk 2 , vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dk izek.k i= tkjh djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; ds le{k viuk Dyse is'k djus ds fy, funsZf'kr fd;k A var esa izkFkhZ ds ekSf[kd lsok lekfIr vkns'k fn-21-11-2016 dks voS/k] 'kwU; o xSj dkuwuh ?kksf"kr djrs gq, fiNys iw.kZ] iwoZ] osru] ykHk] ifjykHk lfgr cgky djus] izkFkhZ dks LFkkbZ deZpkjh ekurs gq, izkFkhZ dks LFkk;h osrueku] osru J`a[kyk o HkRrs e; ,fj;j o e; vBkjg izfr'kr C;kt] eqdnes dk [kpkZ lfgr fnyokus dh izkFkZuk dh gS A

2- vizkFkhZx.k }kjk tokc izLrqr fd;k tkdj izkFkhZ ds LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse dks enokj vLohdkj djrs gq, vfHkopu fd;s gS fd Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ,d jk"Vz~h;d`r foRrh; laLFkk gS ftlesa vusdksa deZpkfj;ksa o vf/kdkfj;ksa dh fu;qfDr gsrq ,d fuf'pr izfdz;k gS ,oa fu;qfDr gsrq mDr izfdz;k dks iw.kZ djds gh p;fur O;fDr dks fu;qfDr iznku dh tkrh gSA deZpkjh dks ukSdjh ls lsokeqDr fd;s tkus dh Hkh ,d fuf'pr izfdz;k gS ftlds rgr fyf[kr vkns'k ls ghs c[kkZLr fd;k tkrk gS ekSf[kd vkns'k ls ugh A vizkFkhZx.k ds ;gka pkj gtkj :i;s ds osru ij dk;Z djus dk dksbZ in vFkok osru J`a[kyk gh l`ftr ugh gS A vizkFkhZ la-2 ds ;gka dHkh fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ fu;qfDr gh ugh gksus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks fdlh izdkj dh lsok ls fn-21-11-16 dks gVkus dk iz'u gh iSnk ugh gksrk gS izkFkhZ ds Lo;a ds dFku ls Li"V gS fd og Lo;a dks nSfud osru ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djrs jgus ds vk/kkj ij LFkk;h fu;qfDr ysus dk iz;kl dj jgk gS A cSad esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh fu;qfDr nsus@gVkus dk vf/kdkj 'kk[kk Lrj ds vf/kdkjh dks ugh gS os dsoy izfrfnu ds vk/kkj ij dqN le;@?kaVs ds tks iwoZ r;'kqnk etnwjh ij fdlh O;fDr dh vko';drkuqlkj dHkh Hkh j[k ldrs gS LFkk;h :i ls fu;qfDr nsus vFkok nSfud osru ds vk/kkj ij Hkh fu;qfDr nsus dk vf/kdkj 'kk[kk izca/kd dks ugh gksrk gS A izkFkhZ }kjk M~;wVh 'kCn dk iz;ksx dj Lo;a dks fu;fer deZpkjh fn[kkus dk iz;kl fd;k gS A cSad esa dk;Zjr lHkh deZpkfj;ksa o vf/kdkfj;ksa dh mifLFkfr ,d fu/kkZfjr izksQkekZ gktjh jftLVj esa ntZ dhs tkrhs gS uk fd lkns jftLVj esa A cSad deZpkfj;ksa dks osru dk Hkqxrku tfj;s okmpj ughs fd;k tkrk ysfdu 'kk[kk esa vkdfLed dk;Z dh etnwjh ds fy;s okmpj ds tfj;s gh Hkqxrku djus dh O;oLFkk gS A cSad ,d foRrh; laLFkk gksus ds dkj.k cSad esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dk Hkqxrku djus ;k fdlh vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s etnwjh dk Hkqxrku cSad }kjk okmpj bR;kfn cukdj gh fu;ekuqlkj fd;k tkrk gS ftlls ikjfn'kZrk ,oa foRrh; vuq'kklu cuk jgs A cSad esa lQkbZ djus Vsscy dh lQkbZ djus] >kMw yxkus ds fy, igys ls gh fu;qDr LFkkbZ deZpkjh }kjk gh laikfnr dh tkrh gS A cSad ds egRoiw.kZ okmpj dhs ckbafMax o mUgsa b/kj m/kj ys tkus ckcr~ fu;qDr nQ~rjh }kjk fd;k tkrk gSA Mkd ykus o ys tkus dk dk;Z cSad }kjk dkQh le; iwoZ gh iksLV vkWfQl ls djkuk can djk fn;k gS A lkjh Mkd dwfj;j daiuh ds }kjk o ;fn dksbZ Mkd vk;h gks rks og iksLVeSu ds }kjk gh lh/ks lacaf/kr deZpkjh o vf/kdkjh dks lqiqnZ dh tkrh gS A cSad esa lHkh izdkj ds Hkqxrku fcy ds vk/kkj ij gh fd;s tkus dh O;oLFkk gS A fcy ds lkFk fdlh izdkj dh dsokbZlh ugh fy;k tkrk gS A cSad esa fo'ks"k mRloksa ij usxksf'k;scy baLVz~wesaV ,DV ds vk/kkj ij vodk'k ?kksf"kr gksrk gS A vr% cSad esa dksbZ dk;Z ughs gksus ds dkj.k cSad ugh [kksyk tkrk gS A ;fn fdlh dkj.k ls fdlhs vf/kdkjh ;k fyfid oxS- dks cqyk;k tkrk gS rks mUgsa vykmal@{kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku cSad }kjk fu;ekuqlkj fd;k tkrk gS A lqj{kk@vR;ko';d dkj.kksa ls cqyk;s x;s deZpkjh@vf/kdkfj;ksa ds vykok vU; lHkh yksxksa dk cSad esa izos'k fu"ks/k gksrk gS A izkFkhZ dhs cSad esa fdlh izdkj ls dksbZ fu;qfDr gh ughs gqbZ vr% voS/k rjhds vFkok ekSf[kd vkn'kksa ls lsok lekIr djus dh dksbZ fLFkfr gh iSnk ugh gksrh A izkFkhZ dsoy o dsoy ,d [kqyk etnwj ds rgr o r;'kqnk etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij dqN ?kaVksa ds fy;s gh cSad us j[kk Fkk izkFkhZ ij cSafdax vf/kfu;e o dsanzh; vkS|ksfxd deZdkjh vf/kfu;e ds fu;e ykxw ugh gksus ls izkFkhZ fdlh Hkh izdkj dk ykHk cSad ls ikus dk954 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] gdnkj ugh gS A izkFkhZ cSad esa dHkh fu;ksftr ugh gqvk A izkFkhZ o cSad ds e/; dHkh Hkh dkexkj o fu;sktd dk laca/k LFkkfir ugh gqvk ,oa uk gh dsanzh; deZpkjh vf/kfu;e ds rgr dHkh ykHk iznRr fd;k x;k izkFkhZ dks dsoy r;'kqnk etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij fy;k x;k A etnwj gh jgk cSad dk LFkk;h vLFkk;h deZpkjh ugh A izkFkhZ dsoy vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s gh vko';drkuqlkj cqyk;k x;k o mls r;'kqnk etnwjh iznku dh x;h A cSad }kjk izkFkhZ dks yxkrkj etnwjh ij ugh fy;k A izkFkhZ dks dsoy vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy, gh dHkh&dHkkj cqyk;k x;k A mldk dk;Z lekIr gksus ij mls r;'kqnk etnwjh dk Hkqxrku dj fn;k tkrk Fkk A izkFkhZ cSad esa LFkk;h ;k vLFkk;h vk/kkj ij fu;qDr ughs fd;k vr% izkFkhZ dks dkj.k crkvks uksfVl] NaVuh eqvkotk nsus dk iz'u gh iSnk ugh gksrk gS A uksfVl o NaVuh eqvkots dk izko/kku dsoy cSad ds deZpkfj;ksa ij gh ykxw gksrk gS A vdkfLed dk;Z ds fy;s etnwj tks fd vk';drkuqlkj cqyk;s tkrs gS ml ij vkbZ Mh ,DV ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS A vr% vkbZ Mh ,DV dh /kkjk 25 ,Q th ,p izkFkhZ ij ykxw ugh gksrh vkSj bu izko/kkuksa dk fdlh izdkj dk mYya?ku vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ughs fd;k x;k gS vkdfLed dk;Z [kRe gksus ds ckn izkFkhZ dk cSad ds lkFk deZpkjh fu;ksDrk dk dHkh dksbZ laca/k ugh jgk A vr% lsok lekfIr dk xyr voS/k o xSj dkuwuh gksus dk dksbZ iz'u gh iSnk ugh gksrk gS A izkFkhZ dk dk;Z o le; ,oa vof/k fuf'pr ugh Fkh ,oa dk;Z lekfIr ds ckn og vU;= dk;Z djus ds fy, Lora= gS tks fdlh Hkh izdkj ds vuQs;j yscj izSfDVl dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh vkrk gS A izkFkhZ ds izfr fdlh Hkh izdkj dk dksbZ uk rks lkSrsyk O;ogkj fd;k u gh izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)karksa dk mYa?ku fd;k A izkFkhZ >wBs vkjksi cSad ij vf/kjksfir dj vkdfLed dk;Z dk cnuh;rh ls etnwjh dk nksgjk ykHk ysuk pkgk jgk gS tks U;k;laxr ugh gS A izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ la-2 laLFkku@cSad esa dHkh Hkh fu;ksftr ugh jgk A bl dkj.k izkFkhZ o cSad ds e/; dkexkj o fu;kstd dk laca/k ugh cuk ,oa fj'rk LFkkfir ugh gksus ds dkj.k dksbZ fookn vFkok vkS|ksfxd fookn u rks fo|eku gS vkSj uk gh fookn gksus dk vans'kk gS A izkFkhZ dk ;g izkFkZuk i= varZxr /kkjk 10]11 o 12 vkbZ Mh ,DV dh ifjf/k esa ugh vkus ds dkj.k fo:) vizkFkhZ fujLruh; gS A ifCyd ,aiykW;esaV fcuk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 14 o 16 dh ikyuk fd;s cxSj drbZ laHko ughs gS fo'ks"k dj jk"Vz~h;d`r cSad esa rks drbZ gh laHko ugh gS A izkFkhZ dsoy nSfud etnwjh ij vkdfLed dk;Z djus] r;'kqnk etnjh izkIr dj vizkFkhZ cSad laLFkku esa fu;skftr gksus dk nkok ugh dj ldrk gS ,oa u gh og fdlh fo'ks"k vuqrks"k ikus dk gdnkj gS A izkFkhZ ;sudsu izdkjs.k fiNys njokts ls cSad esa fu;qfDr gsrq izos'k djuk pkg jgk gS tks u dsoy mu yksxksa ds fgrksa ij dqBkjk?kkr gksxk tks p;u izfdz;k ds rgr cSad esa fuq;Dr gq, gS cfYd cSdMksj ,aVz~h dks ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us Hkh vius vusd fu.kZ;ksa esa mYysf[kr fd;k gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gS A

3- U;k;ky; }kjk mHk;i{k ds ijLij fojks/kh vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij fn- 4-4-2018 dks fuEukafdr fook|d dk;e fd;s x;s%&

1- vk;k izkFkhZ us viuh fu;qfDr fn-7-6-2010 ls lsokeqfDr fn- 21-11-2016 ds iwoZ rd vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu rhu gtkj :i;s izfrekg ds osru ij nQ~rjh e; lQkbZ deZpkjh ds in ij vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk ij ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnol ls vf/kd dk;Z yxkrkj ,oa fu;fer :i ls fd;k gS \

2- vk;k vizkFkhZx.k us izkFkhZ dks fn- 21-11-2016 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q th ,oa ,p ds mYya?ku esa vuqfpr Je O;ogkj dj xyr o voS/k rkSj ij lsokeqDr dj fn;k \

3- vk;k izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS \

4- vuqrks"k \

4- izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls ekSf[kd lk{; esa , Mc-1 jkeizlkn Lo;a izkFkhZ dh lk{; ys[kc) djokrs gq, nLrkosth lk{; esa izn'kZ Mc-1 ls Mc-51 izLrqr dj iznf'kZr djok;s x;s gS rFkk vizkFkhZx.k dh lk{; ds nkSjku vizkFkhZ i{k }kjk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls izLrqr nLrkostksa esa ls izn'kZ Mc-52 yxk;r Mc-189 Hkh iznf'kZr djok;s x;s gS A vizkFkhZ i{k dhs vksj ls ekSf[kd lk{; esa ,u , Mc-1 eukst dqekj jktu 'kk[kk izca/kd dh lk{; ys[kc) djok;h x;h gS fdarq dksbZ nLrkost iznf'kZr ugha djok;s x;s gS A

5- cgl vafre lquh x;h A fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ ds vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds nksgjko ds lkFk rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ dhs ekSf[kd lk{; ,oa mlds }kjk iznf'kZr nLrksoth lk{; ls izkFkhZ dk vizkFkhZx.k ds v/khu vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk esa izkFkhZ ds vfHkopukuqlkj vof/k esa mlds vfHkopuksa esa of.kZr dk;Z yxkrkj djuk lkfcr gksrk gS A mlds izR;sd o"kZ esa 240 fnol iwjs gksrs gS A Lo;a vizkFkhZ lk{kh }kjk Hkh izkFkhZ dk dk;Z izR;{k o vizR;{k :i ls Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS o vf/kdrj iz'uksa ij og ,d rjg ls fu:Rrj gh jgk gS A Lo;a vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr nLrkost Hkh izkFkhZ ds ekeys dh iqf"V djrs gS A izkFkhZ dks va'kdkfyd Jfed crk;k x;k gS fdarq mlls iw.kZ dky rd dk;Z fy;k tkrk Fkk og va'kdkfyd Jfed Fkk rks Hkh og vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l ds rgr Jfed dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSA mls vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls nSfud osru Hkksxh crk;k x;k gS A blls Hkh izkFkhZ ds ekeys ij dksbZ foijhr vlj ugh iMrk gS A vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ckotwn U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa ds iwjs okmpj is'k ugh fd;s x;s A muds fo:) mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS D;ksafd 'kiFk i= Hkh is'k ugh fd;k x;k fd vU; okmpj miyC/k ugh gS A vizkFkhZx.k dk ekeyk ;g ugh gS fd izkFkhZ dks dksbZ uksfVl o NaVuh HkRrk fn;k tkdj lsokeqDr fd;k x;k gks A mlds LFkku ij vU; Jfed j[kk tkuk Hkh fl) gS ,sls esa izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,Q th ,p ds mYay?ku esa gS tks Jfed cSadksa esa 180 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z dj ysrs gS og LFkkbZdj.k ds ik= gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse Lohdkj fd;k tkdj ekaxk x;k vuqrks"k iznku fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A vius rdksZ ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar Hkh izLrqr fd;s x;s gS%&

1- 2011 ySc vkbZ lh 2799 nsfoanj flag cuke E;qfufliy dkmafly] lukSj]

2- 2018 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 117 ¼NRrhlx<½ f'koiwtu dqekj cuke LVsV vkWQ NRrhlx<]955 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 3- 2018 ySc vkbZ lh 2115 LVsV vkWQ mRrjk[kaM o vu; cuke d`".kiky]

4- 2009 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 1264 ¼bykgkckn½ iatkc us'kuy cSad , QkbZusaf'k;y vaMjVsfdax o vU; cuke ;wfu;u vkWQ bafM;k o vU;]

5- 2005 ySc vkbZ lh 3750 us'kuy Leky baM0 dkWjiksjs'ku fy0 cuke nh ih vks] 1 ,Mh'kuy yscj dksVZ] enzkl o vU; A

6- [kaMu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vizkFkhZx.k ds vius tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds rF;ksa ds nksgjko ds lkFk rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ o vizkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;ksftr o fu;kstd ds laca/k fl) ugh gS u gh izkFkhZ vizkFkhZx.k dk Jfed fl) gS A ekeyk izkFkhZ dks lkfcr djuk Fkk rFkk mldh lk{; fo'oluh; ugh gS A vizkFkhZ lk{kh us izkFkhZ dh fLFkfr Li"V dh gS A og vko';drk ds vk/kkj ij gh dHkh&dHkkj dk;Z ij j[kk tkrk Fkk tks dk;Z mldk tokc LVsVesaV esa of.kZrkuqlkj lhfer Fkk A ml ij vkbZ Mh ,DV ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS rFkk izkFkhZ Jfed dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh vkrk gS A cSadksa esa HkrhZ fof/k izfdz;k vuqlkj gksrhs gS ;fn LFkkuh; eSustj }kjk mls dqNsd vof/k ds fy,s dqN pan ?kaVksa dk dk;Z djok Hkh fy;k x;k gS rks mlls vf/kdkj iSnk ugh gksrs gS A ;s lc rF; tks vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls j[ks x;s gS i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ls fl) gS A Lo;a izkFkhZ }kjk viuh lk{; esa fu;qfDr i= ugh nsuk] LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks osru fHkUu izdkj ls fn;k tkuk vius 'kCnksa esa Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS A cSad ds ikl tks okmpj Fks is'k dj fn;s x;s gS A 'ks"k Fks gh ughA tks Fks mUgsa cSad ugh jksd ldrk A okmpj jksduk ;fn izkFkhZ ekurk gS rks mlus vkifRr dh gksrh A izkFkhZ fdlh Hkh izdkj ls fdlh Hkh vuqrks"k dk ik= ugh gS A mldk LVsVesaV vkQ Dyse >wBs rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr gS A mlus ekfld osru crk;k gS tcfd ftjg dh lk{; esa og izfr fnol ds fglkc ls okmpj }kjk osru izkIr djuk ,oa ckxokuh dk dk;Z djuk Lohdkj djrk gS ftlls mlds ekeys dh iksy [kqy tkrh gS A var esa izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kfkjt djus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h gS A

8- izkFkhZ lk{kh , Mc-1 jkeizlkn }kjk }kjk viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds rF;ksa dks gh ntZ djok;k x;k gS ftjg dh lk{; esa lk{; nh gS fd eq>s cSad us fu;qfDr i= ugh fn;k Fkk A eSusa tc cSasd ls osdsalh fudyh Fkh rc vkosnu i= fn;k Fkk A mDr vkosnu i= i=koyh ij ekStwn ugh gS A eq>s eSustj lkgc us ukSdjh ij j[kk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd cSad vf/kdkjh deZpkjh vkSj pijklh dh fu;qfDr gsrq ijh{kk gksrhs gS vt[kqn dgk fd esjk Hkh baVjO;w gqvk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd fyf[kr ijh{kk ds ckn mudk baVjO;w gqvk Fk A ;g lgh gS fd fyf[kr ijh{kk ds ckn mudk baVjO;w fy;k tkrk gS A ;g lgh gS fd fyf[kr ijh{kk o baVjO;w esa ikl gksus ds ckn gh cSad }kjk fu;qfDr i= tkjh fd;k tkrk gS A eSusa fyf[kr ijh{kk ugh nh Fkh ysfdu esjk dsoy baVjO;w gqvk Fkk A vt[kqn dgk fd ikap eSustj us feydj esjk baVjO;w fy;k Fkk vkSj ml le; pkSng osdsalh Fkh A ml osdsalh esa esjk uke gksrs gq, Hkh feyhHkxrh ds dkj.k esjk uke dkV fn;k x;k vkSj gekjs dks vk'oklu fn;k fd bls ckj ughs gqvk rks vxyh ckj djok nsaxs vkSj N% ekg ckn osdsalh fujLr dj nh x;h A eq>s cSad us ukSdjh gsrq baVjO;w ds fy;s cqykus o ukSdjh ij j[kus ckcr~ dFku fd;s gS og rF; eSusa vius Dyse esa vafdr ugh djok;s gS A eq>ls rks dke fcuk fu;qfDr i= ds djok;k gS A ;g lgh gS fd fu;qfDr ds ckcr~ ,oa osrueku ds ckcr~ dksbZ nLrkostkr~ fjdkMZ ij ughs gS A ;g lgh gS fd eSusa lsok ls i`Fkd djus okys vf/kdkjh dk uke bl Dyse esa ugh fy[kk gS A ;g lgh gS fd fu;qfDr ,oa lsokeqfDr vkns'k fyf[kr esa gh gksrk gS A vt[kqn dgk fd eq>s rks ekSf[kd gh j[kk Fkk vkSj ekSf[kd gh gVk;k Fkk A cSad etZ gks jgh Fkh blfy, gVk;k FkkA tc eSa ukSdjh ij yxk Fkk rc eq>s rhu gtkj :i;s izfrekg osru nsrs Fks A ;g lgh gS fd ,slk dksbZ nLrkost ;k i= is'k ugh fd;k ftlls tkfgj gks fd rhu gtkj :i;s ds osru ij fdlh u;s deZpkjh dks j[kk tkrk gks A eSusa rks N% lky ls T;knk dke fd;k gS A eq>s ekSf[kd gVkus ds ckn rqjar nwljs vkneh dks yxk fn;k Fkk A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSustj dks lsok esa j[kus dk vf/kdkj ugh gks A bl ckcr~ dksbZ nLrkostkr~ i=koyh ij is'k ugh fd;k gS uk gh esjh tkudkjh esa gS A ;g dguk xyr gS fd cSad ,d nks ;k rhu ?kaVs ds fy;s dke gksus ij fdlh dks cqykdj dke ysrs Fks eSa rks iwjs le; jsxqyj dke fd;k Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd gktjh jftLVj esa ijekusaV vf/kdkjh] deZpkjh nLr[kr djokrs gS tcfd esjh gktjh dPps jftLVj esa gksrh Fkh A esjh gktjh dk dPpk jftLVj is'k ugh fd;k D;ksafd og cSad dk nLrkost gS A ;g lgh gS fd dPps jftLVj esa LFkkbZ deZpkjh ds gLrk{kj ugh gksrs Fks esjs gh gLrk{kj gksrs Fks A dPps jftLVj esa Hkh gktjh ns[kdj nLr[kr djrs Fks tks fd esjs fy;s esaVsu gksrk Fkk A ;g lgh gS tc 'kk[kk esa vkdfLed dk;Z dh etnwjh ds fy;s okmpj ds tfj;s gh Hkqxrku djus dh O;oLFkk gS A ;g lgh gS fd cSad esa lQkbZ djus] >kMw yxkus ikuh fiykus gsrq LFkkbZ deZpkjh fu;qDr gS vt[kqn dgk fd nQ~rjh lsokfuo`r gks x;k Fkk bl otg ls eq>s yxk;k Fkk A fDy;fjax ykus ys tkus dk dke Hkh eSa gh djrk Fkk D;ksafd nQrjh lsokfuo`r gks tkus dh otg ls eSa gh mDr dk;Z djrk FkkA ;g lgh gS fd cSad esa Mkd dksfj;j ls vkrh gS ge rks dsoy pSd fjVuZ nsus tkrs Fks A iksLV vkfQl ls Mkd gksrh Fkh og iksLVeSu gh Mkd ykrk Fkk A fMlvkWuZj pSd tks ikVhZ ysdj ugh tkrh Fkh mls dksfj;j ls Hkh Hkstk tkrk Fkk A ;g dguk xyr gS fd mijksDr dk;ksZ ds fy, LFkkbZ deZpkjh fu;qDr gksus ds dkj.k ogh dk;Z djrk gks vt[kqn dgk fd eSusa rks ;g lkjs dke fd;s gS D;skafd nQrjh lsokfuo`r gks x;k Fkk A ,Vh,e esa jkf'k vf/kdkjh }kjk Mkyh tkrh gS fdarq ds'k dks mBkus ds fy, eq>s ysdj tkrs Fks A cSad eq>s vyx vyx okmpj cukdj nsrh Fkh A cSad us eq>s rhl fnu dk Hkqxrku okmpj ughs fd;k cfYd vyx vyx izdkj ls Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd cSad esa vf/kdkjh deZpkjh dks iwjs rhl fnu dk osru fn;k tkrk Fkk A ;g dguk lgh gS fd eq>s rhl fnu dk osru ,d lkFk ugh fn;k A vyx vyx fnuksa dk okmpj cukdj osru fn;k tkrk FkkA eghuk iwjk gksus ds ckn ,d gh fnu vyx vyx VqdMksa esa okmpj ls cSad eq>s Hkqxrku nsrh Fkh ,slk dksbZ nLrkost ugh gS fd VqdMks okys okmpj ,d gh fnu fn;s gks A izn'kZ Mc-7 fn-4-2- Mc-9 22-2] izn'kZ Mc-10 26-2 izn'kZ Mc-12956 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] esa rkjh[k ugh gS A izn'kZ Mc-14 esa 6-4-11 izn'kZ Mc-16 esa 21-5- gh vafdr gS A ;g lgh gS fd LFkkbZ vf/kdkjh] deZpkjh pijklh dks VqdMks esa okmpj ds tfj;s isesaV ugh fn;k tkrk gS A ;g dguk lghs gS fd eq>s okmpj ds }kjk VqdMks esa Hkqxrku ,d fnu gh fd;k tkrk FkkA ;g lgh gS fd eSa LFkkbZ ugh Fkk bl otg ls VqdMks esa okmpj }kjk Hkqxrku fn;k tkrk gks A eSa nl&ckjg ?kaVs dke djrk FkkA ;g lgh gS fd usxksf'k;scy baLVz~wesaV esa tc cSad dk vodk'k gksrk Fkk rc cSad esa dk;Z gksus ds dkj.k cSad ugh [kksyk tkrk Fkk A rks mUgsa vykmal {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku cSad }kjk fu;ekuqlkj fd;k tkrk Fkk vt[kqn dgk fd pijklh ugh vkrs Fks blfy, eq>s cqykrs Fks A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eq>s r;'kqnk etnwjh ds rgr vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy, cqykdj vkidks rnuqlkj etnwjh ns nh tkrh gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd eq>ls cSad us yxkrkj vkSj fu;fer :i ls dk;Z ugh djok;k gks A ;g lgh gS fd cSad gVkus ls iwoZ uskfVl nsrhs gS ;g lgh gS fd eSa cSad dk LFkkbZ deZpkjh ugh Fkk bl otg ls cSad us dkj.k crkvks uksfVl tkjh ugh fd;k Fkk A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eq>s jkst ds fglkc ls jkf'k cSad nsrh Fkh A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSa cSad esa dk;Z ds vykok vU; dksbZ dk;Z djrk Fkk vt[kqn dgk fd lqcg lkls gh lacaf/kr nLrkost gS A izn'kZ Mc-6 ij cSad dh lhy ugh gS fdarq cSad vf/kdkjh ds y?kq gLrk{kj gS A izn'kz Mc-6 eSusa 'kkL=huxj 'kk[kk dks fn;k Fkk A 'kk[kk esa pkyhl xeys gS isM ugh gS A izn'kZ Mc-6 eSusa ckxokuh dk dk;Z ckcr~ izLrqr fd;k Fk A ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSa dsoy ckxokuh dk dk;Z gh djrk FkkA izn'kZ Mc- esa nQrjh dk dk;Z djus ckcr~ dksbZ o.kZu ugh gS A izn'kZ Mc-7 esa Hkh eq>s etnwjh feyh og ckxokuh ds dk;Z ckcr~ feyh Fkh A cSad us izn'kZ&10 esa gkWy dh lQkbZ ckcr~ etnwjh nsus dk o.kZu gS ysfdu cSad bl izdkj ls okmpj nsdj osru dk Hkqxrku djrh Fkh A iznz'kZ Mc-19 i= Hkh esusa fn;k ftlesa vafdr fd;k fd ikS/kksa esa ikuh fiykus ckcr~ fn;k vt[kqn dgk fd ;g bl izdkj ds okmpj gj eghus cSd dks esjs }kjk cSad vf/kdkfj;ksa ds funsZ'k ij nsrk Fkk A ;g lgh gS fd okmpj esa etnwjh ds rF; vafdr ugh gSA izn'kZ Mc- 30 esjs gkFk dk gS A vaMjxzkmaM ls ikuh fudkyus dh e'khu esjs ugh Fkh A ;g lgh gS fd vaMjxzkmaM ls ikuh e'khu ls eSusa gh fudkyk Fkk A ;g lghs gS fd e'khu fdjk;k etnwjh dh jkf'k Hkh eSusa yh Fkh A ;g dguk xyr gS fd esjs }kjk nQ~rjh dk dk;Z ughs fd;k tkrk gks vkSj ckxokuh dk dk;Z fd;k tkrk gks A eSusa mDr dk;ksZ ds lkFk ckxokuh dk Hkh dk;Z fd;k Fkk A

9- vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls vk;s lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 eukst dqekj jktu rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd }kjk viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa vizkFkhZx.k ds vfHkopukuqlkj gh lk{; ntZ djok;h x;h gS rFkk ftjg dh lk{; esa mlus lk{; nh gS fd fn-7-6-10 dks esajh iksfLVax esMrk flVh d`f"k mit eaMh 'kk[kk esa FkhA ;g ckr lgh gS fd jkeizlkn us esjs lkeus cSad dk dksbZ dk;Z ugh fd;k A ;g ckr lgh gS fd eSa 21-11-16 dks 'kkL=huxj 'kk[kk esa Fkk A ;g ckr lgh gS fd fn-18-7-16 ls 21-11-16 rd izkFkhZ us 'kkL=h uxj 'kk[kk esa dk;Z fd;k Lor% dgk fd izkFkhZ us 'kk[kk esa dk;Z ugh fd;k A izn'kZ Mc-53 ls izn'kZ Mc-189 vkt geus vnkyr vkns'k vuqlkj is'k fd;s gS A izn'kZ Mc-178 ij , ls ch fdlds y?kq gLrk{kj fdlds gS eSa ughs crk ldrk A ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ Mc-177 gekjh 'kkL=huxj 'kk[kk dk gS A izn'kZ Mc-32]34]36]39]43 45]49 ;g mDr okmpj gekjh 'kkL=huxj 'kk[kk ds gS A izn'kZ Mc-32 uk'rs dk okmpj gS A izn'kZ Mc-34 ihus dk ikuh dk okmpj gS A izn'kZ Mc-36 feRry vLirky ls lacaf/kr okmpj gS izn'kZ Mc-39 yscj ds dk;Z dk okmpj gS A izn'kZ Mc-43 ckx cxhps dh lQkbZ ds okmpj gS A izn'kZ Mc-45 okmpj Li"V ughs gSA izn'kZ Mc-49 Vz~kaliksVZ pktZ dk okmpj gS A ;g ckr lgh gS fd mDr okmpj ,d fnukad ds ughs gS vyx vyx fnukad ds gS A ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ Mc-53 ls izn'kZ Mc-178 ;g okmpj izkFkhZ }kjk ,d gh dk;Z djus ds ughs gS vyx vyx dk;Z djus dk gS A ;g esjh tkudkjh esa ugh gS fd fn-7-6-10 dks tc izkFkhZ dks cSad us nSfud osru Hkksxh deZpkjh ds :i esa j[k Fkk ;k ughs rks ds okbZ lh fy;k ;k ugh A cSad esa Msyh ostst deZpkjh j[kus dk dksbZ izksfotu ughs gS dsoy vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s j[ks tkrs gS A ;g ckr lgh gS fd izkFkhZ cSad esa vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s fngkMh etnwjh dk dk;Z esjs dk;Zdky ds le; djrk FkkA ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ Mc-179 ls izn'kZ Mc-187 rd tks gktjh jftLVj gS A tks cSad LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dk gS A cSad esa vkdfLed dk;Z djus okys deZpkfj;ksa dk dksbZ gktjh jftLVj ugh gksrk gS A vdkfLed deZpkjh@fngkMh etnwj mlds dk;Z ds vuqlkj etnwjh r; djds mldk Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk gS A izkFkhZ dks fdrus osru fngkMh ds nsrs Fks ;g fuf'pr ugh Fkk A izn'kZ Mc-177 okmpj esjs dk;Z dk ugh gs A izn'kZ Mc-27 izkFkhZ us 'kkL=huxj 'kk[kk esa fn;k FkkA izn'kZ Mc-27 ij , ls ch laHkor% jkts'k xks;y ds vf/kdkjh gks ldrs gS A izn'kZ Mc-27 izkFkhZ ds nsus ds ckn cSad us bldk Hkqxrku fd;k gh gksxk A Hkqxrku Hkh mlds }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z ds vuqlkj fd;k gksxk A ;g ckr lgh gS fd izkFkhZ us fn-16-11-16 rd dksbZ dk;Z fd;k gksxk rks Hkqxrku fd;k gksxk A izkFkhZ ds }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z dk Hkqxrku mldh ekax ds vuqlkj Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk FkkA ;g eSa ugh dg ldrk fd izkFkhZ }kjk tks izkFkZuk i= cSad esa Hkqxrku ckcr~ nsrk Fkk og cSad ds vf/kdkfj;ksa ds dgus ds vuqlkj cukrk gks A eSa tc 'kkL=huxj esa vk;k mlls iwoZ izkFkhZ us dk;Z fd;k ;k ughs eSa ughs dg ldrk vt[kqn dgk fd okmpjksa ds vuqlkj dk;Z fd;k gksxk A

10- izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr o iznf'kZr izn'kZ Mc-3 ekuuh; jkt- mPp U;k;ky;] cSap] t;iqj }kjk ,l ch flfoy fjV fiVh'ku la- 5265@2017 mUokuh dqynhiflag cuke ,l ch vkbZ oxS0 esa fn-4-9-2017 dks ikfjr vkns'k dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi dh izfr gS ftlesa izkFkhZ Hkh ;kph gS ftlesa ekuuh; jkt- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEu izdkj vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s gS%&

The writ petition is disposed of with the said observations."957 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 11- izn'kZ Mc-1 izkFkhZ }kjk le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k izLrqr f'kdk;r izkFkZuk i= ,oa izn'kZ Mc-2 mlesa vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk izLrqr tokc dh QksVks izfr gS A i=koyh ij izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls le>kSrk vf/kdkjh }kjk varxZr /kkjk 2 , vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds rgr tkjh izek.k i= izn'kZ Mc-4 izLrqr ,oa izn'kZ Mc-5 Hkh fd;s x;s gS A

fook|d la[;k&1%&

12- mDr fook|d dks fl) djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ ij jgk gS A vius vfHkopuksa ds leku gh izkFkhZ lk{kh , Mc-1 jkeizlkn }kjk izLrqr viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa fu;qfDr fn-7-6-2010 ls mldks gVk;s tkus dh fnukad 21-11-16 rd vizkFkhZ la-2 ds ;gka yxkrkj lk{; lQkbZ okmpj dh QkbZfyax o mUgsa ykus&ys tkus o Mkd vkfn ykus&ys tkus dh lk{; nh x;h gS rFkk ftjg dh lk{; esa bl laca/k esa mlus ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mls fu;qfDr i= ugh fn;k x;k Fkk A vizkFkhZ lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 eukst dqekj }kjk viuh eq[; ijh{kk ds 'kiFk i= esa izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr ls ;|fi badkj fd;k gS fdarq mlds }kjk lkFk gh ;g Hkh lk{; ntZ djok;h x;h gS fd izkFkhZ dks dsoy [kqyh etnwjh ds rgr r;'kqnk etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij dqN ?kaVksa gsrq ghs cSad }kjk j[kk x;k gS og dsoy etnwj gh Fkk deZpkjh ugh Fkk mls vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy, vko';drkuqlkj cqyk;k tkrk Fkk o etnwjh izfrfnu dh tkrhs Fkh mls yxkrkj etnwjh ij ugh j[kk x;k A dk;Z lekIr gksus ij r;'kqnk etnwjh dk Hkqxrku dj fn;k tkrk Fkk A vizkFkhZx.k ds mDr vuqlkj gh vfHkopu jgs gS fdarq vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls vk;k mDr lk{kh viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa fn-18-7-2016 ls gh vius vkidks vizkFkhZ la-2 'kk[kk dk izca/kd crkrk gS rFkk mlus izkFkhZ ds mlds lkeus cSad esa dksbZ dk;Z ugh djus o djus dh lk{; nsrs gq, bl rF; dks lgh crk;k gS fd izkFkhZ cSad esa vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s fngkMh etnwjh dk dk;Z mlds dk;Zdky ds le; djrk Fkk A izkFkhZ us fn-16-11-16 rd dksbZ dk;Z fd;k gksxk rks Hkqxrku fd;k gksxk A og tc 'kkL=huxj esa vk;k mlls iwoZ gh izkFkhZ us dk;Z fd;k ;k ugh fd;k og ugh dg ldrk okmpjksa ds fglkc ls fd;k gksxk A bl izdkj viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa Hkh izkFkhZ dk lQkbZ deZpkjh o nQ~rjh ds :i esa dk;Z djus ls Li"V :i ls euk ugh fd;k gS A izkFkh }kjk lkQ&lQkbZ dk dk;Z djus ls lacaf/kr izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuk i= ,oa mlds Hkqxrku ds okmpj i=koyh ij miyc/k gS ftuesa ls izn'kZ Mc-10]55 o 56 ls okmpj ekg Qjojh 2011 esa ikap fnol o ukS fnol] izn'kZ Mc-15 o 16 okmpj o izkFkZuk i= ls ekg ebZ 2011 esa X;kjg fnol] izn'kZ Mc-33 o 34 izkFkZuk i= o okmpj ls ekg flracj 2011 esa o izn'kZ mc-57 o 58 izkFkZuk i= o okmpj ls ekg tqykbZ 2011 esa nl fnol o izn'kZ Mc-61 o 62 ls ekg Qjojh 2012 esa nks fnol izn'kZ&67 o 68 ls ekg ekpZ 2013 esa ,d fnol izn'kZ Mc-78]79 ls ekg ebZ 2012 esa ,d fnol o izn'kZ Mc-109 o izn'kZ Mc-110 ls ekg uoacj 2012 esa ,d fnol mDr dk;Z fd;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS A izkFkhZ ds Hkqxrku ds izkFkZuk i= o okmpj izn'kZ Mc-7 o Mc-6 ,oa Mc-53 o 54 ls ekg tuojh 2011 esa izn'kZ Mc-19 o 20 ls ekg vizSy 2011 esa o izn'kZ Mc-42]43 ls ekg uoacj 2013 esa o izn'kZ Mc-46]47 ls ekg tuojh 2014 esa o izn'kZ Mc-50 o 51 ls ekg vizSy 2014 esa izn'kZ Mc-25] Mc-26] Mc-27 ,oa Mc-28 ls ekg flracj 2015 ,oa 2016 esa izn'kZ Mc-59 o 60 ls ekg tuojh 2012 esa izn'kZ Mc-65]66 ls ekg Qjojh 2012 esa izn'kZ Mc-76]77 ls ekg vizSy 2012 esa] izn'kZ Mc-81]82 ls ekg twu 2012 esa] izn'kZ Mc-85]86 ls ekg vxLr 2012 esa] izn'kZ Mc-99 o 100 ls ekg flracj 2012 esa] izn'kZ Mc-111]112 ls ekg vDVwcj 2012 esa] izn'kZ Mc-113]114 ls ekg uoacj 2012 esa izn'kZ Mc-115 o 116 ls ekg fnlacj 2012 esa rFkk izn'kZ Mc-117 o izn'kZ Mc-118 esa ekg ebZ 2013 esa izn'kZ Mc-121 o izn'kZ Mc-122 ls ekg twu 2013 esa izn'kZ Mc-125]126 ls ekg vxLr 2013 esa izn'kZ Mc-127 o 128 ls ekg flracj 2012 esa izn'kZ Mc-133]134 ls ekg ekpZ 2014 esa] izn'kZ Mc-135]136 ls ekg vizSy 2014 esa] izn'kZ Mc-139]140 ls ekg uoacj 2014 esa] izn'kZ Mc-141]142 ls ekg tuojh 2014 esa] izn'kZ Mc-143]144 ls ekg fnalcj 2014 esa] izn'kZ Mc-145]146 ls ekg tuojh 2015 esa izn'kZ Mc-147]148 ls ekg Qjojh 2015 esa] izn'kZ Mc-149]150ls ekg tqykbZ 2015 esa] izn'kZ Mc-151]152 ls ekg vxLr 2015 esa izn'kZ Mc- 153]154 ls ekg flracj 2015 esa] izn'kZ Mc-155]156 ls ekg vDrwcj 2015 esa] izn'kZ Mc-161]162 ls ekg fnlacj 2015 esa o izn'kZ Mc-163 yxk;r 166 ls ekg tuojh 2016 esa izn'kZ Mc-167 yxk;r 170 ls ekg Qjojh o ekpZ 2016 esa rFkk izn'kZ Mc-174 o 175 ls ekg ebZ 2016 esa ckxokuh dk dk;Z dj Hkqxrku vizkFkhZ la-2 ls izkIr fd;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS A blds vykok xeys o jSai dyj ds izkFkZuk i= ij ,oa Hkqxrku ds okmpj izn'kZ Mc-157]158 ekg uoacj 2015 ,oa xeys ikS/ks feV~Vh ykus ds Hkqxrku ds izkFkZuk i= o okmpj izn'kZ Mc-172]173 ekg twu 2016 ds gS ftuls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk ikS/ks] feV~Vh] xeys ekg twu 2016 esa yk;s x;s o ekg uoacj 2015 esa xeys o jSai ds dyj fd;s x;s A Hkqxrku ds izkFkZuk i= o okmpj izn'kZ Mc-30 ls izn'kZ Mc-87 yxk;r 98 ,oa izn'kZ Mc- 104]106]108 ls ;g Hkh izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ la-2 cSad 'kk[kk esa ekg flracj 2011 esa N% fnu o"kZ 2012 ds flracj ekg esa 19]7 o 6 fnu o ekg vDrwcj esa lkr] lkr] N% o N% fnu ikuh fudkyus dkHkh dk;Z fd;k A mDr lQkbZ dk;Z ,oa ikuh fudkyus ds dk;Z ls lacaf/kr Hkqxrku ds mDr izkFkZuk i=ksa o okmpj ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk izkFkhZ dks fnolksa ds fglkc ls etnwjh dk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k fdarq ckxokuh ls lacaf/kr Hkqxrku ds mDr izkFkZuk i=ksa o mDr okmpj ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd mls Hkqxrku ekfld rkSj ij fd;k x;k A blds vykok QksVks LVsV ds fcy o okmplZ izn'kZ Mc-14] Mc-18]33]35]36 Hkh i=koyh ij gS ftudk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ ds ek/;e ls vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk fd;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS A izn'kZ Mc-24]49]63]64]69]70]7284]101]102]129]130 yxst o Vz~kaliksVs'ku ls lacaf/kr jlhnsa o okmplZ gS ftuls vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk izkFkhZ ls VªkaliksVZ lacaf/kr dk;Z djokuk izdV gksrk gS A LVs'kujh ls lacaf/kr fcy o okmplZ izn'kZ Mc-8]9]23]29]71]159]160 ;g nf'kZr djrs gS fd vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk izkFkhZ ds ek/;e ls LVs'kujh Hkh eaxok;h x;h A izn'kZ Mc-74]75 fcy okmpj ls izkFkhZ ds tfj;s vxjcRrh eaxokus] izn'kZ Mc-119 o 120 izkFkZuk i= o okmpj ls LVkai eaxokus] izn'kZ Mc-123]124]137]138]176 o 177 izkFkZuk i= o okmplZ ls izkFkhZ ls pSuy xsV o 'kVj esa rsy Myokus dk dk;Z Hkh vizkFkhZ la-2 }kjk fy;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS A izn'kZ Mc-31 o 32 fcy okmpj ls pk;] dpkSjh uk'rk eaxokus o izn'kZ Mc-36]37 fcy okmpj ls izkFkhZ ls fxykl dz; djus dk dk;Z fy;k tkuk Hkh izdV gksrk gS A izn'kZ Mc-11]12]13] 37 yxk;r 41] 44 o 45 izkFkZuk i= o okmplZ ls vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZ ls lkeku mBkus o j[kus dk dk;Z fy;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS A mDr izkFkZuk i=] fcy o okmplZ izkFkhZ }kjk crk;s x;s vius dk;Z vof/k ds nkSjku ds gh gS ftuesa ls izkFkhZ }kjk QksVks izfr esa izLrqr958 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] nLrkost vizkFkhZ cSad ds ugh gks rFkk mu fdlh cSad eSustj ds gLrk{kj ughs gks] ,slh badkjh vizkFkhZ lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 eukst dqekj }kjk ughs dh x;h gS A mlus izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= o okmpjksa ds QthZ gksus ckcr~ Hkh lk{; ugh nh gS A vizkFkhZx.k }kjk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls izLrqr 'ks"k of.kZr okmpjksa o Hkqxrku ds izkFkZuk i=ksa o fcyksa dks Lo;a vizkFkhZx.k }kjk gh is'k fd;k x;k gS rFkk okmpjksa esa of.kZr dk;Z izkFkhZ }kjk djuk vizkFkhZ lk{kh ,u , Mc-1 eukst dqekj }kjk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS ftuls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ ls lkQ&lQkbZ ds vykok LVs'kujh o vU; lkeku eaxokus] LVs'kujh LVkai [kjhn djus ,oa QksVks LVsV djokus ds dk;Z] VªkaliksVZs'ku ls lacaf/kr dk;Z] ikuh fudkyus o ckxokuh ls lacaf/kr dk;Z lkeku j[kus o mBkus o jax] vkW;y bR;kfn djokus ls lacaf/kr dk;Z djok;s x;s A bl U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuk i= ij fn-12-6-18 dks vkns'k djrs gq, izkFkhZ ls lacaf/kr mifLFkfr ds jftLVj okmpj vFkok muds miyC/k ugh gksus dh fLFkfr esa lqLi"V 'kiFk i= is'k djus ds vkns'k fn;s x;s Fks fdarq vizkFkhZx.k }kjk tks okmpj is'k fd;s x;s gS os o"kZ 2011yxk;r 2016 ds ghs gS A mifLFkfr jftLVj tks vizkFkhZx.k }kjk is'k fd;s x;s gS tks izkFkhZ ls lacaf/kr ugh gS rFkk budk LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa ls lacaf/kr gksuk mDr vizkFkhZ lk{kh us Lohdkj fd;k gS A o"kZ 2010 ds okmpj ,oa mifLFkfr jftLVj izkFkhZ ls lacaf/kr vizkFkhZXk.k ds ikl miyC/k ughs gks] ,slk dksbZ 'kiFk i= vizkFkhZx.k dhs vksj ls izLrqr ughs fd;k x;k gS A izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2009 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 1264 ¼bykgkckn½ iatkc us'kuy cSad , QkbZusaf'k;y vaMjVsfdax o vU; cuke ;wfu;u vkWQ bafM;k o vU; esa 'ks"k le; ds okmpj izca/ku }kjk TokbaV baliSD'ku ds le; izLrqr ughs fd;s tkus ij mlds fo:) mi/kkj.kk fd;k tkuk ekuuh; bykgkckn mPp U;k;ky; }kjk lgh gksuk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS A ftlds n`f"Vxr vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fn;k x;k ;g rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; ugh gS fd mDr 'ks"k vof/k ds okmpj is'k ugh fd;s tkus ij izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dk;Zokgh djuh pkfg, Fkh A muds }kjk 'ks"k vof/k ds okmpj o mifLFkfr jftLVj miyC/k ugh gksus ds Hkh rdZ fn;s x;s gS fadarq bl laca/k esa dksbZ 'kiFk i= vkns'kkuqlkj izLrqr ughs fd;k x;k gS ,sls esa 'ks"k vof/k ds okmpj o izkFkhZ ls lacaf/kr mifLFkfr jftLVj ds fy, vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) ;g mi/kkj.kk cus fcuk ughs jgrhs gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk 'ks"k vof/k esa Hkh mDr izdkj dk;Z fd;k x;k A bl izdkj izkFkhZ }kjk of.kZr vof/k esa vizkFkhZx.k ds ;gka vizkFkhZ la-2 dh 'kk[kk esa ckxokuh lkQ&lQkbZ ds vykok mDr of.kZr dk dk;Z fujarj djus ckcr~ lk{; izkFkhZ ds i{k esa gS ftlds n`f"Vxr izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls fn;s x;s ;g rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; gS fd izkFkhZ us fn-7-6-10 ls mldks fn-21-11-16 dks gVk;s tkus rd mDr foosfpr dk;Z fd;s A mlds ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnol ls vf/kd fnol dk dk;Z djus ls Hkh badkjh ugh dhs tk ldrhs gS mldks ekfld Hkqxrku rhu gtkj :i;s dk ,d lkFk gksuk izdV ugh gksrk gS fdarq mlds }kjk nh x;h ;g lk{; fd mldks Hkqxrku vyx&vyx okmpjksa ls VqdMksa esa fd;k tkrk Fkk mDr nLrkostksa ds en~ns utj udkjh ugh tk ldrh gSA ,sls esa mldk osru izfrekg dqy rhu gtkj :i;s ughs gks] ;g Hkh ugh ekuk tk ldrk gS A bl izdkj mDr fook|d la-1 ds rF;ksa ij lk{; izkFkhZ ds i{k esa gS vr% ;g fook|d la-1 mDr izdkj gh izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k tkrk gS A

13- vc ge fook|d la-3 o rRi'pkr~ fook|d la-2 o 4 ij fopkj djuk U;k;ksfpr le>rs gS A

fook|d la[;k&3%&

14- bl fook|d dks fl) djus dk Hkkj vizkFkhZx.k ij jgk gS A vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ vkdfLed deZpkjh Fkk ftldks ftruk dk;Z og djrk Fkk mldk Hkqxrku mlds dk;Z ds fglkc ls fd;k tkrk Fkk A vr% mlds ekeys esa vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS rFkk og vizkFkhZx.k dk Jfed ekus tkus ;ksX; ugh gS A blds foijhr izkFkhZ dhs vksj ls rdZ jgs gS fd izkFkhZ ;fn nSfud osruHkksxh vkdfLed Jfed Fkk rks Hkh ml ij vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw gksrs gS A izkFkhZ lk{kh , Mc-1 jkeizlkn }kjk viuh ftjg dh lk{; esa okmpj dh jhfr ls mlds dk;Z dk Hkqxrku gksuk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fadarq Lo;a vizkFkhZx.k ds vfHkopuksa o lk{; vuqlkj og Lohd`r rkSj ls vkdfLed nSfud osruHkksxh O;fDr jgk gS ftlds laca/k esa mDr fook|d la-1 mDr izdkj izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS A izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2011 ySc vkbZ lh 2799 nsfoanj flag cuke E;qfufliy dkmafly] lukSj esa ikVZVkbZe] dkaVzZ~SDP;qvy] Vsaijsjh o dStqvy ,aiykW;h dks Hkh vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l ds varZxr Jfed gksuk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS A U;kf;d n`"Vkar2018 ySc vkbZ lh ¼,u vks lh½ 117 ¼NRrhlx<½ f'koiwtu dqekj cuke LVsV vkWQ NRrhlx< esa ekuuh; NRrhlx< mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikVZVkbZe fLoij tks fd vLFkkbZ fu;kstu esa Fkk] ds ekeys esa Hkh vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw gksuk vius 'kCnksa esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS A mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ds mDr vfHkerksa ds n`f"Vxr vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fn;s x;s mDr rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; ughs gS rFkk ;g ugh ekuk tk ldrk gS fd izkFkhZ vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l vuqlkj Jfed o vizkFkhZx.k mlds fu;sktu rFkk izkFkhZ o vizkFkhZx.k esa fu;ksftr o fu;kstd ds laca/k ekus tkus ;ksX; ughs gks rFkk gLrxr izdj.k esa vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gksA QyLo:i mDr fook|d vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fofu'pr fd;k tkrk gS A

fook|d la[;k&2%&

15- mDr fook|d dks fl) djkus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ ij jgk gS A fook|d la-1 mDr izdkj izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS rFkk fook|d la-3 vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZx.k dk Jfed vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 2 ,l ds rgr ekuk x;k gS A izkFkhZ dks fn-31-12-15 dks gVk;s tkus ls iwoZ dksbZ NaVuh HkRrk ;k uksfVl fn;s tkus dk rF; vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fdlh Hkh izdkj ls ugh j[kk x;k gS A izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2005 ySc vkbZ lh 3750 us'kuy Leky baM0 dkWjiksjs'ku fy0 cuke nh ih vks] 1 ,Mh'kuy yscj dksVZ] enzkl o vU; esa ekuuh; enzkl mPp U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ,oa 2 ,l ds n`f"Vxr vkdfLed deZpkjh o fu;fer deZpkjh ds e/; dksbZ foHksn ugh gS rFkk vkdfLed deZpkjh Hkh ;fn gVk;k tkrk gS Rkks og /kkjk 25 ,Q ds izko/kkuksa dk Qk;nk ysus dk ik= gS A ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fn;s x;s ;g rdZ ekus tkus ;ksX; gS fd izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh959 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940 /kkjk 25 ,Q ds mYya?ku esa gksuk fl) gS A tgka rd /kkjk 25 th ,oa ,p dk iz'u gS] izkFkhZ ds ckn esa fdu O;fDr;ksa dks fujarj lsok esa j[kk x;k tks Hkh izkFkhZ ds leku gh fLFkfr esa Fks ,sls izkFkhZ ds vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa Li"V vfHkopu ughs gS A mldh lk{; esa Hkh ,slk dksbZ Li"V ,oa fof'k"V rF; ughs gS A ,sls esa /kkjk 25 th o ,p vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dk mYya?ku izkFkhZ fl) ugh dj ik;k gS A /kkjk 25 ,Q vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 ds mYya?ku esa vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dhs x;h lsokeqfDr voS/k] vuqfpr o xyr ekus tkus ;ksX; gS vr% mDr fook|d la-2 izkFkhZ ds i{k esa mDrkuqlkj gh vkaf'kd :i ls fofu'pr fd;k tkrk gS A

fook|d la[;k&4 vuqrks"k%&

16- mDr fook|d vuqrks"k ds ckjs esa gS A fook|d la-1 mDr izdkj izkFkhZ ds i{k esa fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS rFkk fook|d la-2 esa izkFkhZ dh vizkFkhZx.k }kjk dh x;h lsokeqfDr vkbZ Mh ,DV 1947 dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ds mYya?ku esa voS/k] vuqpfr o xyr ekuh x;h gS A fook|d la-3 vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fofu'pr fd;k x;k gS A izkFkhZ }kjk vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ;g vfHkopu ugh fd;s x;s gS fd og viuh lsokeqfDr ds i'pkr~ ykHkizn fu;kstu esa ughs jgk gS o csjkstxkj jgk gS u gh mldh ,slh dksbZ lk{; gS A mlus viuk osru izfrekg rhu gtkj #i;s crk;k gS mldh dk;Z vof/k fn-7-6-10 ls 22-11-16 rd dh jghs gS A mDr foospukuqlkj og vkdfLed nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfed jgk gS A mldk fu;kstu HkrhZ izfdz;k ls Hkh ugh gS ftu leLr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds en~ns utj izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZx.k dh lsok esa iwoZ osru ifjykHk lfgr iquZLFkkiuk ds ctk; :i;s

vkns'k

17- vr% izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse fo:) vizkFkhZx.k mDr izdkj Lohdkj fd;k tkdj izkFkhZ dh vizkFkhZx.k }kjk fn- 21-11-16 dks dh x;h lsokeqfDr voS/k o 'kwU; ?kksf"kr fd;s tkrs gq, izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZx.k dh lsok esa iwoZ osru ifjykHk lfgr iquZLFkkiuk ds ctk; vizkFkhZx.k ls ,deq'r {kfriwfrZ Lo:i #- 2]50]000@& vadbZ :i;s

18- vokMZ fy[kk;k tkdj vkt fnukad 09-8-2018 dks [kqys U;k;ky; gLrk{kj dj lquk;k x;kA vokMZ dh izfr fu;ekuqlkj dsanzh; ljdkj dks okLrs xtV esa izdk'ku izsf"kr dh tkos A

,l- ,u- Vsyj] U;k;k/kh'k

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 306-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eS- lkabZ f'kfiax dEiuh ¼izk-½ fल- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 7@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-02- 2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II½]

Lkhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 306.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 7/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/S. Sai Shipping Company (P) Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.02.2019.

[No. L-39025/01/2019 - IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

APPLICATION [REF] NO. CGIT-2/7 of 2017

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. SAI SHIPPING COMPANY (P) LTD. & 2

ORS.

1. M/s. Sai Shipping Company (P) Ltd., 1109, Embassy Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 001.

960 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. Mr. Khalid Vohra, Director, 1109, Embassy Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 001

3. Mr. Hussain Suleman Khot, Operational Manager, 1109, Embassy Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 001.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

1. Shri Santosh R. Khushawha,

2. Shri Mohd. Mukhtar G. Khan,

3. Shri Aslam G. Khan,

4. Shri Awadesh U. Pandey,

5. Shri Susheel C. Patel,

6. Shri Shakil M. Khan, C/o. The Bombay Transport & Dock Workers Union, Shroff Mansion, 157-B, Room No.25, 4th Floor, Mumbai – 400 001.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. M. B. Anchan, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. V. Narayanan, Representative

Mumbai, dated the 11th December, 2018.

AWARD

1. This is an application filed under section 2A (2) read with section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2. In this matter notices were issued to both parties. Matter was fixed for filing written statement by management.

3. Meanwhile, today Second party workmen and first party management filed joint pursis [Ex.25] stating that the matter has been amicably settled and prayed to dispose of the reference. Order is passed on Ex.25. Accordingly I pass the following order.

ORDER

Reference is disposed of as settled.

Date: 11.12.2018

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 307-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj fo'kk[kkiVue iksVZ VªLV ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 42@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-02- 2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&34011@2@2009&vkbZvkj ¼ch&II½]

Lkhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 307.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 42/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Vishakhapatnam Port Trust, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.02.2019.

[No. L-34011/2/2009 - IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer961 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan , Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 42/2009

Between:

Sri Nammi Appala Raju, S/o Simhachalam, D.No.6-38-23/2, L.V. Nagar, Drivers Colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)

…Petitioner

AND

The Secretary & Correspondent, Visakhapatnam Port Trust Educational Society, Port Area, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)

… Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. V. Narasimha Goud & M. Madhusudhan, Advocate

For the Respondent : Sri Alluri Krishnam Raju, Advocate

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 34011/ 2/2009-IR(B.II) dated 12.10.2009 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this forum to decide the question:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Visakhapatnam Port Trust Educational Society, Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sh. N. Appala Raju w.e.f. 6.12.2007 is legal and justified? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No.42/2009 and issued notices to both the workman and the management. They both appeared before the court and engaged their respective counsels with the leave of the court and consent of either party.

2. The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner joined in the services of the Respondent on 20.12.1994 and worked as a Sweeper cum Sanitary and Attendar continuously without any remark till he was illegally terminated by the Respondent and the last drawn salary of the Petitioner workman was Rs.2100/- per month and he used to draw the above salary from the State Bank of Hyderabad, Saligramapuram Branch, Visakhapatnam. It is stated that the Petitioner while working as Sweeper cum Sanitary and Attender since 12 years, the Respondent Society illegally regularized two persons namely Sri D. Laxmana Rao, Smt. B. Samadanam as Sweeper cum Sanitary and Attendars. The above said two persons are five years juniors to the Petitioner. The Respondent without verifying/considering the seniority of the Petitioner, regularized two juniors. The Petitioner submitted representation to the Respondent in this regard. It is further submitted that the Respondent society without giving any intimation terminated him from service. Subsequent to the said illegal termination the Petitioner submitted representation on 22.4.2008 to the Respondent society through registered post for considering his case and to continue him in service as a Sweeper cum Sanitary and Attendar and to regularise his service. But the Respondent society did not consider the request of the Petitioner. The Petitioner also submitted representations to i) The District Education Officer, Visakhapatnam District, ii) The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam, iii) The Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Visakhapatnam on 6.5.2008, 7.5.2008, 26.5.2008 respectively. It is further submitted that basing on the request of the Petitioner the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) has conducted joint discussions on 2907.2008 and on various other dates. Finally the conciliation held on 14.11.2008 and due to divergent views of the parties, the conciliation proceedings were closed as ended in failure. Basing on the failure of conciliation dated 14.11.2008 the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) referred the matter for arbitration as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, through it was agreeable to the workman and the management has not agreed for arbitration, saying that there is no merit in the dispute. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) referred the said matter to the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi through his letter bearing No.16/25/2008-ALC dated 4.5.2009. It is also submitted that without mentioning the fact the Respondent submitted bearing letter No. VPES/50/ Misc/08 dated 4.9.2008 to the Assistant Labour962 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Commissioner (C) Visakhapatnam. It is further submitted that the Respondent without conducting any enquiry and without any basis, behind the back of the Petitioner, by violating the principles of natural justice have determined to terminate the service of the Petitioner at any cost. It is also submitted that the Petitioner is still unemployed and he could not secure any alternative employment inspite of putting his best efforts and because of the illegal removal, not only the Petitioner but also his family members has been effected. The Petitioner has also submitted that at the time of hearing he will produce all the relevant documents. In the above circumstances, the Petitioner has filed his claim statement with a prayer to direct the Respondent to reinstate him into service with all back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits and to regularise his service otherwise, the Petitioner will suffer great hardship and irreparable loss.

3. Respondents filed their counter with the averments in brief as follows:

The Respondent while denying the facts averred in the claim statement has stated that Visakhapatnam Port Trust Educational Society is an undertaking of Visakhapatnam Port Trust. During the month of July 2003, the Head master of Malkapuram while working under Visakhapatnam Port Trust Educational Society has requested the management for providing a sanitary labour to the school building for cleaning the school building premises toilets and lavatories, thereafter the management instructed the Head Master to engage any labour available in the locality for sanitation work of the school on daily payment basis as a temporary measure, since there is no sanctioned post to attend the sanitary work under the VPE Society and the sanitary work is generally attended by the Port Sanitary staff. Accordingly, the Head Master of Port High School, Malkapuram entrusted the sanitation work to Sri N. Appala Raju, the Petitioner on daily payment basis at the rate of Rs.60/- per day. Later on at the request of the Head Master, Port Primary School, Malkapuram, the sanitary labour services were extended to primary school from 11/2004 by raising the daily wages from Rs.60/- to Rs.70/- per day. For administrative convenience, the daily payments are consolidated on the basis of number of days attended and payment was made by way of cheque once in a month. It is further stated that due to administrative reasons it was decided to decentralize the payment for such sanitary services and entrusted to make payment directly by the Head Mistress to the sanitary labour whoever was engaged in cash as was done in earlier. But when the Head Mistress tried to pay the remuneration in cash, the sanitary labour Sri N. Appala Raju refused to take such remuneration in cash for 10/07 and 11/07. From 1.12.07, Sri N. Appala Raju, sanitary labour was not attending the sanitation work in the school without any intimation and after waiting for 14 days i.e., upto 14.12.2007, the Head Mistress has engaged another sanitary labour from 15.12.2007 to look after the sanitation work since sanitation is more important in the school in view of the health of the students. The payment of newly engaged sanitary labour is being paid by cash. It is also stated that the request of the Petitioner for regular payment cannot be considered as he was engaged temporarily on daily wage basis, and not on rolls since VPE Society has no sanctioned post for sanitary work since the sanitation of Visakhapatnam Port Trust areas and buildings are normally attended by Visakhapatnam Port Trust through its sanitary staff, but due to shortage of staff in sanitary division, the sanitation work was attended on casual basis, but at present Visakhapatnam Port Trust sanitary division staff are attending the sanitary work and the temporary sanitary labour engaged for sanitation has already been discontinued. It is also stated that since the Petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis and he voluntarily stopped attending sanitation work, the Head Mistress has every right to discontinue his services. More over the Respondent has neither given any direction for engaging the services of the Petitioner nor VPE Society has disengaged the services of the Petitioner. The Head Mistress had been advised to engage a person purely on casual temporary basis to attend the sanitation work, engaged the services of the Petitioner, accordingly and latter he himself has abstained from attending his duties, and after waiting for about 14 days, the Head Mistress (I/c) has taken immediate steps and engaged another sanitary labour, as improper sanitation in the school will affect the health of hundreds of school children, and hence the action taken by the Respondent is legal and justified. It is also stated that consequent to the withdrawal of the Petitioner from attending the sanitation work another labour namely, Sri K. Ramu was entrusted with the said work from 15.12.2007 to 10.6.2008 and presently the entire sanitation work of the school is being taken care of by the Visakhapatnam Port Trust at their expenses. The Respondent submitted that in view of the above facts the claim of the Petitioner is not maintainable and the Petitioner is not entitled to get any relief and as such the Respondent submitted for rejection of the claim of the Petitioner. It is also submitted that there is no termination by the Respondent to the Petitioner, and the Petitioner has worked from July, 2003 to November, 2007 as a temporary sanitation labourer to the school and voluntarily the Petitioner himself not attended for the sanitation work from 1.12.2007 onwards and the Respondent did not terminate the services of the Petitioner. It is further stated that there is no permanent post for sanitation work for the VPE Society or sanitation of the school, and other places of the Society will look after by the Visakhapatnam Port Trust with their employees at their own costs. Presently, the Visakhapatnam Port Trust is taking care of the sanitation work and the question of regularisation or taking service of the Petitioner is not having any bearing. Under the above circumstances, the Respondent submitted to dismiss the above ID.

4. As per the averments made by both the parties, the following points are to be answered:-

I. Whether the action of the Management of Visakhapatnam Port Trust Educational Society, Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sh. N. Appala Raju w.e.f. 6.12.2007 is legal and justified?

II. If not, to what relief the Petitioner is entitled for?

5. During the course of hearing the Petitioner workman has examined himself as WW1 and also relied on 16 documents which are marked as Ex.W1 to W16. The Respondent has neither examined any witness nor participated at the time of hearing of the case. The workman has also not been cross examined by the Respondent.

963 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

6. I have already heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and perused the evidence adduced so far. The Petitioner being examined himself as WW1, has fully corroborated the averments made in his examination in chief. The evidence of WW1 has also found support from the averments made in the claim statement. Similarly, the evidence of WW1 also finds support from the documents relied on by the Petitioner workman. Admittedly, the Petitioner was working under the Respondent as a temporary sweeper cum sanitation attendar. The Petitioner has stated that he joined in the service of the Respondent on 20.12.1994. But no document has been filed from the side of the workman Petitioner to show that he has worked under the Respondent since 20.12.1994 to 6.12.2007. But the Respondent in their counter has clearly averred that on daily wage basis the Head Mistress of the Respondent school has engaged the Petitioner to work from the month of July, 2003 @ Rs.60/- per day. Similarly, from the month of November, 2004 his pay has been enhanced from Rs.60/- to Rs.70/- per day. The Respondent has also admitted that the Petitioner was working in the school upto November, 2007 and voluntarily remained absent to attend duties from 1.12.2007. Thereafter the Respondent engaged another man for sanitation work of the school. In fact, the Petitioner has never worked under the Respondent regularly. But he was working as a sanitary attendar on temporary basis. The Respondent has admitted that as because the Petitioner workman did not attend the work they have terminated his service and engaged a new man in his place to manage the sanitation work. When the workman has worked for a period of more than 4 years he should be terminated following due procedure of law. Admittedly the work of sanitation work is of perennial in nature and the Respondent has also admitted that in absence of the sanitary attendar they are unable to manage the sanitation work which clearly indicates that the workman was working for more than 240 days in a year when he was in service. While terminating the service of the Petitioner the Respondent should have issued termination notice to the workman. But the Respondent has not complied it. When the Respondent has terminated the service of the Petitioner orally without giving any notice, and when the Respondent has not come forward to challenge the claim of the Petitioner, the unchallenged testimony of the workman clearly proves that the Petitioner is entitled to get the benefits as claimed by him in his claim petition. Thus, the e Petitioner workman is entitled to get the termination benefits as provided under Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the termination of the Petitioner workman is illegal and not justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

7. Point No. II: Admittedly the Petitioner was working under the Respondent on daily wage basis. His service was temporary in nature. It is not known whether there is any vacancy in the school for the post of sweeper cum sanitation attendar under the Respondent's management. Further more, the Respondent has admitted that the Petitioner has voluntarily left the office and did not come to join in duty, then they have engaged another man in his place to manage the work of sanitation. No where the Petitioner has stated that his juniors have joined regularly after his termination, and Sri D. Laxmana Rao and Smt. B. Samadanam were regularized illegally after his termination. When the Petitioner did not come forward to manage the sanitation work of the school, it is obvious on the part of the Respondent to engage the services of other person for such sanitation work. The Respondent has not obtained any explanation from the Petitioner under what circumstances he (the Petitioner) failed to attend his duty. Since the Petitioner has failed to attend his duty, the Respondent has rightly taken the service of another person to manage the work of sanitation as because the Petitioner had not been given any appointment against any regular vacancy. Further more, admittedly, the Petitioner has not worked during the period from 2007 onwards in the Respondent's management, as he has stopped working voluntarily, Sri K. Ramu was engaged for the sanitation work of the school by the Head Mistress. Therefore, the Petitioner is not entitled to get any back wages during the above period. Thus, the Petitioner is only entitled to get the termination benefits as provided under Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Thus, Point No.II is answered accordingly.

8. Point No. III: In view of the findings given in Points Nos. I & II, the Petitioner is only entitled to get the benefits under Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Thus, Point No.III is answered accordingly.

Result:

The reference is answered as under:

The action of the management of Visakhapatnam Port Trust Educational Society, Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sh. N. Appala Raju, w.e.f. 6.12.2007 is not legal and justified.

The Petitioner is entitled to get terminal benefits under Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Respondent management is directed to follow the provisions of Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also provide the termination benefits to the Petitioner as provided under Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 within a period of four months after receipt of the copy of this award, failing which the Petitioner is entitled to get the same through due process of Law.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 29th day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer964 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

WW1: Sri N. Appala Raju NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex.W1: Lr No.16/25/2008-ALC dt. 4.5.2009

Ex.W2: Original Lr. of proceedings dt. 10.10.2008 for conducting conciliation proceedings dt.10.10.2008 Ex.W3: Original Lr. of proceedings dt. 10.10.2008 for conducting conciliation proceedings 23.7.2008

Ex.W4: Lr. Endorsed by ALC(C) Visakhapatnam dt.26.5.2008

Ex.W5: Photostat copy of representation of WW1 to Dy. Commissioner of Labour dt.7.5.2008

Ex.W6: Photostat copy of representation of WW1 to Dist. Education officer dt.6.5.2008

Ex.W7: Photostat copy of representation of WW1 to the Respondent dt.22.4.2008

Ex.W8: Photostat copy of lr. No.VPES/50/mise/08 by Respondent to ALC(C), Visakhapatnam

Ex.W9: Photostat copy of lr. to Respondent dt.1.3.2007

Ex.W10: Photostat copy of pass book showing salary particulars of WW1

Ex.W11: Postal receipts

Ex.W12: Acknowledgement from Respondent

Ex.W13: Acknowledgement from Chairman, Port Trust

Ex.W14: Acknowledgement from H.M. Port Education Society

Ex.W15: Acknowledgement from DEO, Visakhapatnam

Ex.W16: EPF annual statement of WW1

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 308-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ flaxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ≶ Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 12@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@85@2014&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 308.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 12/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/85/2014–IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer965 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 22nd day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 12/2015

Between:

The President, (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana), Telengana Trade Union Council, Rajkumar Complex, Saibaba Temple Road, Jaffar Nagar, Mancherial – 504 208. Adilabad Distt.

…Petitioner Union

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Sreerampur Area, Sreerampur-504 303. Adilabad Distt.

…Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : None

For the Respondent : M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma, P. Vijaya Laxmi & Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/85/2014-IR(CM-II) dated 23.1.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Sreerampur Area, Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Akula Mallesh, Ex-Coal Filler, RK-New Tech.Inc., Sreerampur Area with effect from 26.9.2003 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 12/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.

3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement bf the Petitioner union. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner union remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner union. Non-appearance of the Petitioner Union and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the Petitioner union has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the Petitioner Union is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 22nd day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

966 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 309&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ िसंगारेनी कोिलयरीज कं पनी िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] हैदराबाद ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 61/2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@30@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 309.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 61/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/30/2013 – IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 23rd day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 61/2013

Between:

The General Secretary (Sri Riaz Ahmed), Singareni Mines & Engg. Workers Union (HMS), Ar. No.C-34, Sector-I, Godavarikhani – 505 209. Karimnagar Distt. …Petitioner

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri -504231. Adilabad Distt. (A.P.)

…Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/30/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 30.4.2013 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this forum to decide the question:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Chief General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri, Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri M. Jedson, Ex-Coal Filler, MK-4 Inc., SCCL., Mandamarri Area with effect from 30.11.2002 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No. 61/2013 and issued notices to both the workman and the management. They both appeared before the court and engaged their respective counsels with the leave of the court and consent of either party.

967 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

2. The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:

The Workman Sri M. Jedson was appointed as a badli filler in the year 1985 and later his services have been confirmed as Coal Filler in the year 1995. The workman was regular to his duties till his dismissal from service. But during the year 2001, the workman suffered with ill-health and he took treatment in the company hospital. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet was issued to the workman by the Respondent alleging that the workman absented for duty during the period from 13.7.2001 to 15.10.2001, which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.31. On receipt of the charge sheet the workman approached the authorities New Delhi and explained that on account of his ill-health and other personal problems, he could not be regular to his duties and he has also shown the sick certificates issued by the medical officers of the company's hospital. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 26.11.2002 with effect from 30.11.2002. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and other personal problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered 17 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order dated 26.11.2002 with effect from 30.11.2002 issued by the Respondents is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, with back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 10.1.19989 as Badli Filler and subsequently he was regularized as Coal Filler w.e.f. 1.1.1995. He was charge sheeted for habitual absenteeism during the year 2001 and he was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 7.1.2016.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the Chief General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri Adilabad Distt., in terminating the services of Sri M. Jedson, Ex. Coal filler, MK-4 Inc., SCCL, Mandamarri Area with effect from 30.11.2002 is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to his illness, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, one reasoned order is required to be passed and the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

968 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service and also the punishment imposed by the Respondents needs no interference.

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other personal problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 44 years, he is now aged about 50 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for his reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is a first offender but has worked for about 17 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri M. Jedson is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri M. Jedson is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

RESULT:

In the result, the reference is answered as follows:

The action of the Chief General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri, Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri M. Jedson, Ex-Coal Filler, MK-4 Inc., SCCL., Mandamarri Area with effect from 30.11.2002 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri M. Jedson be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli Filler, Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes the one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of attaining his superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 23rd day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer969 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 310-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ िसंगारेनी कोिलयरीज कं पनी िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] हैदराबाद ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 88/2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@110@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, 21st February, 2019

S.O. 310.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 88/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/110/2013 – IR (CM-II)] RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 24th day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 88/2013

Between:

The President (Bandari Satyanarayana), Telengana Trade Union Council , H.No.5-295, Indra Nagar, Opp. Bus Stand, Mancherial – 504 208. Adilabad District. …Petitioner

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri (P.O.) Adilabad district – 504231.

… Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. S. Bhagawanath Rao & S.V.Ramadevi, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/s. Nandigam Krishna Rao & N.S. Pattabhi Rama Rao, Advocates970 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

This is a reference issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi vide order No.L-22012/110/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 5.9.2013 whereunder this Tribunal is required to adjudicate the dispute i.e.,

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area., Mandamarri., Adilabad District., in terminating the services Sri Marumandla Rayalingu, Ex-Coal Filler, MK-4 Inc., SCCo. Ltd., Mandamarri Area, with effect from 28.10.2004 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?''

After receiving the above said reference this Tribunal registered the case as I D No.88/2013 and issued notices to both the parties and secured their presence.

2. The workman filed his claim statement with the averments in brief as follows:

The workman Sri Marumandla Rayalingu, was initially appointed as a Badli Filler on 18.6.1983. He was regular to his duties and performing his duties upto the satisfaction of all his superiors. While so, he could not be regular to his duties during the year 2002 due to his ill-health. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 11.4.2003 was issued to him by the Respondent alleging that the Workman absented for duty during the year 2002, which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Unfortunately, the workman could not submit any explanation to the charge sheet and also could not participate in the enquiry. Subsequently, one ex-parte inquiry was conducted and the Workman was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved, and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Workman was dismissed from service w.e.f. 28.10.2004. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Workman has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 2002, was only on account of his ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Workman was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondent's management in dismissing the Workman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Workman has rendered 21 years of continuous service in the Respondent's management. The Workman approached the Respondent to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Workman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order issued by the Respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Workman into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..

3. Respondent filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:

In the counter the Respondent while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Workman was appointed in the Respondent's company on 18.6.1983 as Badli Filler and subsequently got regularized as coal filler on 1.3.1993. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Workman did not attend the enquiry, which was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Workman was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Workman by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Workman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Workman from service. It is stated that in fact the Workman was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Workman is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. The domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 14.7.2017.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Marumandla Rayalingu is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Workman is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Workman argued that due to his ill-health as well as other family problems, the Workman could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Workman has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Workman. When the Workman has taken a stand that due to his illness and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital punishment.

971 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Workman, and has given capital punishment to the Workman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent argued that when the Workman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondent's company is legal and proper. When the Workman was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness and other family problems, the Workman could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Workman has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Workman were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on the workman. After dismissal of service, the Workman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 43 years, he is now aged about 49 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Workman being an able bodied and energetic man and has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondent, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service at the end of his service period. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Workman is a first offender and has worked for about 21 years under the Respondent, while imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondent management for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Marumandla Rayalingu is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Marumandla Rayalingu is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Workman has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Workman has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Workman should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondent's management. But in this case, the Workman has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Workman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondent's management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

RESULT:

In the result, the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area., Mandamarri., Adilabad District., in terminating the services Sri Marumandla Rayalingu, Ex-Coal Filler, MK-4 Inc., SCCo. Ltd., Mandamarri Area, with effect from 28.10.2004 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman cannot claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for his appointment afresh and the reference is answered accordingly, so also the, award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 24th day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer972 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Workman Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Workman

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 311-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ िसंगारेनी कोिलयरीज कं पनी िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] हैदराबाद ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 89/2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@109@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 311.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 89/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/109/2013 – IR (CM-II) ]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 24th day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 89/2013

Between:

The President (Bandari Satyanarayana), Telengana Trade Union Council , H.No.5-295, Indra Nagar, Opp. Bus Stand, Mancherial – 504 208. Adilabad District. …Petitioner

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri (P.O.) Adilabad district – 504231.

… Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. S. Bhagawanath Rao & S.V.Ramadevi, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/s. Nandigam Krishna Rao & N.S. Pattabhi Rama Rao, Advocates973 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

AWARD

This is a reference issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi vide order No.L-22012/109/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 5.9.2013 whereunder this Tribunal is required to adjudicate the dispute i.e.,

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area., Mandamarri., Adilabad District., in terminating the services Sri Gade Bapu, Ex-Coal Filler, KK-5 Inc., SCCo. Ltd., Mandamarri Area with effect from 16.11.1998 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?''

After receiving the above said reference this Tribunal registered the case as I D No. 89/2013 and issued notices to both the parties and secured their presence.

3. The workman filed his claim statement with the averments in brief as follows:

The workman Sri Gade Bapu, was initially appointed as a Badli Filler on 16.10.1986. He was regular to his duties and performing his duties upto the satisfaction of all his superiors. While so, he could not be regular to his duties during the year 1998 due to his ill-health. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 28.3.1998 was issued to him by the Respondent alleging that the Workman absented for duty during the year 1998, which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Unfortunately, the workman could not submit any explanation to the charge sheet and also could not participate in the enquiry. Subsequently, one ex-parte inquiry was conducted and the Workman was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved, and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Workman was dismissed from service through proceeding dated 27.9.1998.It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Workman has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 1998, which was only on account of his ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Workman was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondent's management in dismissing the Workman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Workman has rendered 12 years of continuous service in the Respondent's management. The Workman approached the Respondent to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Workman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order issued by the Respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Workman into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..

3. Respondent filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:

In the counter the Respondent while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Workman was appointed in the Respondent's company on 16.10.1986 as Badli Filler and subsequently got regularized as coal filler. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Workman did not attend the enquiry, which was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Workman was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Workman by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Workman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Workman from service. It is stated that in fact the Workman was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Workman is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. The domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 14.7.2017.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Gade Bapu is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Workman is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

974 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness and other family problems, the Workman could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Workman has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Workman were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on the workman. After dismissal of service, the Workman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 40 years, he is now aged about 46 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Workman being an able bodied and energetic man and has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondent, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service at the end of his service period. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Workman is a first offender and has worked for about 12 years under the Respondent, while imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondent management for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Gade Bapu is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Gade Bapu is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Workman has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Workman has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Workman should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondent's management. But in this case, the Workman has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Workman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondent's management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

RESULT:

In the result, the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area., Mandamarri., Adilabad District., in terminating the services Sri Gade Bapu, Ex-Coal Filler, KK-5 Inc., SCCo. Ltd., Mandamarri Area, with effect from 16.11.1998 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman cannot claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for his appointment afresh and as such the reference is answered accordingly. So also the, award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 24th day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer975 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 312-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ िसंगारेनी कोिलयरीज कं पनी िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] हैदराबाद ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 193/2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@49@2014&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 312.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 193/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/49/2014 – IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 22nd day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 193/2014

Between:

The President, (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana), Rashtriya Collieries Mazdoor Sangh(RCMS), Rajkumar Complex, Saibaba Temple Road, Jaffar Nagar, Mancherial – 504 208. Adilabad Distt.

… Petitioner Union

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Sreerampur Area, Sreerampur-504 303. Adilabad

…Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner   :    Representative
For the Respondent   :    Representative

976 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/49/2014-IR(CM-II) dated 8.8.2014 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Sreerampur Area, Adilabad Distt., in terminating the services of Sri Kamera Rayamallu, Ex-Coal Filler, IK-1A Inc., Sreerampur Area with effect from 01.04.2007 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?" The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 193/2014 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case is posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner union.

3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner union. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner union remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner union. Non-appearance of the Petitioner Union and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute outside the court and the Petitioner union has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the Petitioner Union is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 22nd day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 21 Qjojh] 2019

dk-vk- 313-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ िसंगारेनी कोिलयरीज कं पनी िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] हैदराबाद ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 92/2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@65@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 313.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 92/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22012/65/2015 – IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer977 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 22nd day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 92/2015

Between:

Sri MD. Nawab, S/o Sri Goremiya, H.No.152, Bellampalli No.2 Junction, Radhagambala Basthi, Asifabad (Tq.) Adilabad Dist. – 504 251 (Telengana State)

…Petitioner

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani – 505209 Karimnagar Distt. (Telengana State). … Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : None

For the Respondent : Representative

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 22012/65/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 30.9.2015 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt., in terminating the services of Sri Md. Nawab, Ex-Genl Mazdoor, GDK-1 & 3 Inc., SCCL, Ramagundam-1 Area with effect from 11.6.2006 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 92/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.

3. Inspite of repeated calls, the Petitioner did not turn up. Several opportunities have been given to the Petitioner to attend the court to prosecute his case. No claim statement was filed inspite of taking several adjournments. Non- appearance of the Petitioner and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the Petitioner has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the Petitioner is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 22nd day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer978 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 2 Qjojh] 2019

dk- vk- 314-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ िसंगारेनी कोिलयरीज कं पनी िलिमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सह - Je U;k;ky;] हैदराबाद ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k एलसी 75/2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-02-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&II½]

jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2019

S.O. 314.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. LC 75/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20.02.2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019 – IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 23rd day of January, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 75/2005

Between:

Sri P. Chandrasekhara Rao, S/o Linga Rao, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

… Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Srirampur Area, Srirampur, Adilabad District.

3. The Colliery Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., RK-6 Incline, Srirampur Area, Srirampur Adilabad District. …Respondents979 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

Sri P. Chandrasekhara Rao who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. SRP/PER/13.008/1772 dated 21.3.2005 issued by the first Respondent and the consequential memo No. SRP/RK-6/R.16/05/67 dated 29.3.2005 issued by Respondent No.2 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same, consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deem fit and proper.

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was initially appointed on 29.7.1976 in the Respondents' company and later confirmed as General Mazdoor on 1.12.1977. He was regular to his duties till the year 1999. It is submitted that, to his misfortune, the Petitioner's daughter, who was aged about 14 years, suffered with blood cancer and died on 29.8.1999. As a result of her death, the wife of the Petitioner became seriously ill for nearly 2 ½ years. In the mean while the Petitioner met with an accident on 26.10.2002 and suffered multiple fractures. In view of the above circumstances, the Petitioner was forced to keep himself away from duty. While the matters stood thus, a charge sheet was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2003, which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. The Petitioner submitted his explanation to the charge sheet which was not considered by the Respondents' management. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 21.3.2005 and the consequential memo dated 29.3.2005. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his daughter's ill-health and death, his wife's ill-health and accident to him causing multiple fractures. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered 27 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order dated 21.3.2005 and subsequent order dated 29.3.2005 issued by the Respondents are illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 9.12.1976 but not on 29.7.1976 and subsequently he was promoted as General Mazdoor category III with effect from 1.1.2003. He was charge sheeted for habitual absenteeism during the year 2003 and he was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

980 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 2, 2019/PHALGUNA 11, 1940 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri P. Chandrasekhara Rao is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to his daughter's illness and sudden death of his daughter, ill-health of his wife and he himself met with an accident, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, one reasoned order is required to be passed and the authority should have considered his case while imposing capital punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has imposed capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service and also the punishment imposed by the Respondents needs no interference.

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his unauthorized absence followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on him. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 53 years, he is now aged about 67 years and has already attained the age of superannuation, and at this age he is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. In such a circumstances, atleast one chance should be given to him for his reinstatement into service in order to get all his terminal benefits. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. But the management decided to impose capital punishment. The Petitioner is a first offender and has worked for about twenty two years under the Respondent. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh and is not proper. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri P. Chandrasekhara Rao is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri P. Chandrasekhara Rao is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances, the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But unfortunately, during the pendency of this case the Petitioner has attained the age of superannuation. So, no question of rendering service under the Respondents is expected from the Petitioner. But only he is to be reinstated into service to get all his service benefit and also entitled to get 50% of back wages.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. SRP/PER/13.008/1772 dated 21.3.2005 issued by the first Respondent and the consequential memo No. SRP/RK-6/R.16/05/67 dated 29.3.2005 issued by Respondent No.2 are declared as illegal and the same is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri P. Chandrasekhara Rao be reinstated in service only to get all his terminal benefits. He is entitled to get 50% of back wages. The Respondents are directed to give all the terminal benefits along with 50% of back wages to the Petitioner after four months of this order, failing which the Petitioner is at liberty to recover the same through the process of law.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 23rd day of January, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer981 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मार्च 2, 2019/पफाल्गुन 11, 1940

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी] 2019

का. आ. का. आ. का. आ. का. आ. 315315315315....————राष्ट्रपित, Eी अशोक कु मार सिंह पीठासीन अिधकारी के न्6ीय सरकार औद्योिगक अिधकरण सह Eम न्यायालय सं. 2, चंडीगढ़ को दिनांक 07.02.2019 से छ: माह तक की अवधि अथवा नियमित आधार पर पद के भरे जाने तक अथवा अगले आदेश तक के न्6ीय सरकार औद्योिगक अधिकरण सह Eम न्यायालय सं. 1, चंडीगढ़ के पीठासीन अधिकारी के पद का अतिरिक्त प्रभार सौपते हैं I

[सं. अ-11016/04/2017-सीएलएस-II]

संजीव नंदा, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2019

S.O. 315.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.1, Chandigarh to Shri Ashok Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.2, Chandigarh for a period of six months with effect from 07.02.2019 or till the post is filled on regular basis or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[No. A-11016/04/2017-CLS-II]

SANJEEV NANDA, Under Secy.

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.