Gazette contains multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 43] नई दिल्ली, अक्तूबर 20—अक्तूबर 26, 2019, शनिवार/आश्विन 28—कार्तिक 4, 1941

No. 43] NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 20— OCTOBER 26, 2019, SATURDAY/ASVINA 28— KARTIKA—4, 1941

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

का(cid:3)र्मकका(cid:3)र्मकका(cid:3)र्मकका(cid:3)र्मक,,,, लोक शिकायत और पेंशन लोक शिकायत और पेंशन लोक शिकायत और पेंशन लोक शिकायत और पेंशन मंत्रालय मंत्रालय मंत्रालय मंत्रालय

((((का(cid:3)र्मक और प्रशिक्षण विभागका(cid:3)र्मक और प्रशिक्षण विभागका(cid:3)र्मक और प्रशिक्षण विभागका(cid:3)र्मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग))))

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1866186618661866....————के न्(cid:15) सरकार एतदद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम संख्या 25) की धारा 5 की उपधारा (1) सपठित धारा 6 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए, मध्य प्रदेश राज्य सरकार, गृह विभाग, भोपाल की अधिसूचना सं. एफ.12-85/2018/बी-1/2 दिनांक 19.9.2018 तथा सं. एफ.12-85/2018/बी-1/2 दिनांक 11.9.2019 के द्वारा जारी शु>िपत्र के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमति से सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, मुख्य शाखा, कटनी (मध्य प्रदेश) में भू अर्जन अधिकारी, बर्गी परियोजना, कटनी के नाम से धारित सरकारी खाते में L. 4,09,84,470/- की गई धोखाधड़ी के मामले के सम्बन्ध में पुलिस थाना, माधव नगर, जिला-कटनी (मध्य प्रदेश) में भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 के तहत पंजीकृ त अपराध मामला सं. 1020/2017 तथा उपयु र्क्त एक या अिधक अपराधों के संबंध में किए गए दुष्प्रयासों, दुष्प्रेरणाओं और षSंत्रों तथा उसी संTयवहार में किए गए अथवा उन्हU तथ्यों से उत्पन्न किसी अन्य अपराध या अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार समस्त मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में करती है।

[फा. सं. 228/54/2018-एवीडी-II]

एस. पी. आर. त्रिपाठी, अवर सिचव

5341 GI/2019

(7289)

7290 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2019

S.O. 1866.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Madhya Pradesh, Home Department, Bhopal issued vide Notification No. F 12-85/2018/B-1/Two dated 19.9.2018 and its corrigendum issued vide No. F 12-85/2018/B-1/Two dated 11.9.2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in whole State of Madhya Pradesh for investigation of Criminal Case No. 1020/2017 under sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC registered at Police Station Madhav Nagar, Dist. Katni (M.P) in connection with an incident of fraud of Rs. 4,09,84,470 /- from the Government account standing in the name of the Land Acquisition Officer, Bargi Project, Katni at Central Bank of India, Main Branch, Katni (M.P) and any attempt, abetment and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offence(s) mentioned above and any other offence(s) committed in the course of same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/54/2018-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 1867186718671867....————के न्(cid:15) सरकार एतदद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम

संख्या 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए मणिपुर राज्य सरकार, गृह िवभाग, इम्फाल की अधिसूचना संख्या 12/1(4)/2018-एच(सीबीआई)(बैंक/गारंटी) दिनांक 10 जनवरी 2019,

के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमति से मैसर्स वुडहिल इनaास्ट्रकचर लिमिटेड द्वारा राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग और अवसंरचना विकास निगम (एनएचआईडीसीएल), भारत सरकार का उपcम से तामिनुलोंग-खोरांग रोड़ की अस्थायी मरम्मत हेतु ठेके का कार्य लेने के िलए 66.20 लाख L. की कू टरचित बैंक गारंटी के प्रयोग के संबंध में भारतीय दdड संहिता, 1860 (1860 का अधिनियम संख्या 45) की धारा 468, 471, 477-ए, 120-बी के अधीन सिटी पुलिस थाना की प्राथमिकी सं. 56(4)2016 के अधीन दर्ज मामले में अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार समस्त मणिपुर राज्य में करती है।

[फा. सं. 228/07/2019-एवीडी-II)

एस. पी. आर. त्रिपाठी, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2019

S.O. 1867.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Manipur, Home Department, Imphal issued vide Notification No. 12/1(4)/2018-H(CBI)(Bank/Guarantee) dated 10th January 2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the Members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Manipur for carrying out investigation into Case under FIR No. 56(4)2016 of City Police Station under sections 468, 471, 477-A, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) in connection with use of forged Bank Guarantee of Rs. 66.20 lakh for taking contract work for temporary restoration of Tamenglong-Khongang Road from National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL), a Government of India Undertaking, by M/S Woodhill infrastructure Ltd.

[F. No. 228/07/2019 –AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7291

नई दिल्ली, 18 अक्तूबर, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 1868186818681868....————के न्(cid:15) सरकार एतदद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम संख्या 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए मणिपुर राज्य सरकार, गृह विभाग, इम्फाल की अधिसूचना संख्या 12/1(4)/2019-एच(सीबीआई)(सीडी) दिनांक 4 अप्रैल 2019, के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमित से येरीपोक िननगटथूनई, पुिलस थाना- आं(cid:15)ो, इम्फाल पूर्वी जिला के मोहम्मद मंजूर अहमद पुत्र स्वर्गीय एम.वी. बशीर अहमद की हिरासत में मौत के संबंध में भारतीय दdड संहिता, 1860 (1860 का अधिनियम संख्या 45) की धारा 304 के अधीन इम्फाल पुलिस थाना की प्राथमिकी सं. 82(4)2019 के अधीन दर्ज मामले में अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार समस्त मणिपुर राज्य में करती है।

[फा. सं. 228/10/2019-एवीडी-II)

एस. पी. आर. त्रिपाठी, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2019

S.O. 1868.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Manipur, Home Department, Imphal issued vide Notification No. 12/1(4)/2019-H(CBI)(CD) dated 4th April 2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the Members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Manipur for carrying out investigation into Case under FIR No. 82(4)2019 of Imphal Police Station under section 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) in connection with custodial death of Md. Manjur Ahamad S/o (L) MV. Bashir Ahamad of Yairipok Ningthounai, PS-Andro, Imphal East District.

[F. No. 228/10/2019 –AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 24 अक्तूबर, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 1869186918691869....————कें (cid:15) सरकार, एतदद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 (1946 की अधिनियम सं. 25) की धारा 5 की उप-धारा (1) सपठित धारा 6 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार, गृह (पुिलस) अनुभाग-3 के पत्र सं. 1770(2)पी/VI-पी-3-2018-15(06)पी/2018 लखनऊ, दिनांक 26.07.2018 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमति से भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-बी और jष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 (1988 का अधिनियम 49) की धारा 13 (2) के साथ पठित धारा 13(1)सी, 13(1)डी के अंतर्गत पुिलस थाना कासना, िजला-गौतमबु> नगर, उत्तर प्रदेश में दर्ज अपराध सं. 421/2018 में आगे की जांच करने तथा उपयु र्क्त एक या अधिक अपराधों के संबंध में किए गए किसी दुष्प्रयास, दुष्प्रेरणा और षSंत्र तथा उसी संlवहार में किए गए या उन्हU तथ्यों से उत्पन्न किसी अन्य अपराध(धों) का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार समस्त उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में करती है।

[फा. सं. 228/35/2018-एवीडी-II]

एस. पी. आर. त्रिपाठी, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 24th October, 2019

S.O. 1869.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Uttar Pradesh Home (Police) Section-3 Letter No. 1770(2)P/VI-P-3-2018-15(06)P/2018 Lucknow dated 26.07.2018 hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in whole State of Uttar Pradesh for further investigation of Crime No. 421/2018 under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 497292 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] of 1988) registered at Police Station, Kasna, District Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh and any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with one or more of the offences mentioned above and any other offence (s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/35/2018 –AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

कोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर, 2019

काकाकाका....आआआआ. . . . 1870187018701870....————कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अिधिनयम 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 9 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना का. आ. संख्यांक 766, तारीख 15 मई, 2019 के प्रकाशन पर, भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड (ii), तारीख

18 मई, 2019 में प्रकाशित उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वqणrत भूमि और ऐसी भूमि, (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त भूिम कहा गया है), में या उस पर के सभी अिधकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर, आत्यंतिक रूप में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार में निहित हो गए थे;

और, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है, कि वेस्टर्न कोलफील्uस िलिमटेड, नागपुर, महाराष्ट्र (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त कं पनी कहा गया है), ऐसे निबंधनों और शतv का, जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार इस निम्मित अिधरोिपत करना उिचत समझे, अनुपालन करने के िलए रजामंद है;

अत:, अब, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए, यह िनदेश देती है कि इस प्रकार निहित भूमि 71.77 हेक्टर या 177.43 एकड़ माप वाली उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अिधकार तारीख 18 मई, 2019 से के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने के बजाए, निम्नलिखित निबंधनों और शतv के अधीन रहते 1ए, सरकारी कं पनी में निहित हो जाwगे, अर्थात् : -

(1) सरकारी कं पनी उक्त अिधिनयम के उपबंधों और अन्य सुसंगत विधियों के अधीन यथा अवधारित प्रतिकर, ब्याज, नुकसानियों आदि से संबंिधत और वैसी ही मदों की बाबत् सभी संदाय करेगी;

(2) सरकारी कं पनी द्वारा शर्त (1) के अधीन, संदेय रकमों का अवधारण करने के प्रयोजनों के िलए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक अिधकरण का गठन किया जाएगा और उक्त अधिकरण और किसी ऐसे अधिकरण की सहायता करने के िलए नियुक्त lक्तियों के संबंध में उपगत सभी lय, उक्त सरकारी कं पनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे और इसी प्रकार, िनिहत उक्त भूमियों में या उस पर के अधिकारों के िलए या उनके संबंध में अपील आदि िविधक कार्यवाहियों की बाबत उपगत सभी lय भी सरकारी कं पनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे ;

(3) सरकारी कं पनी, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों की, ऐसे किसी अन्य Tयय के संबंध में क्षतिपूyर्त करेगी, जो इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के बारें में, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार या उसके

पदधारियों द्वारा या उनके विरू> किन्हU कार्यवाहियों के संबंध में आवश्यक हो ।

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7293

(4) सरकारी कं पनी को के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के बिना उक्त भूिम और भूमि में या उसके उपर इस

प्रकारनिहित अधिकारों को किसी अन्य Tयक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नहU होगी ; और

(5) सरकारी कं पनी, ऐसे निदेशों और शतv का पालन करेगी, जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार द्वारा, जब कभी आवश्यक हो,

उक्त भूमि के विशिष्ट क्षेत्रों के लिए दिए जाएं या अधिरोपित किए जाएं ।

[फा. सं. 43015/25/2016-एलए एdड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2019

S. O. 1870.—Whereas on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal, number S. O. 766, dated the 15th May, 2019, published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 18th May, 2019, issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the land and all rights in or over the land described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said land) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the said Act ;

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur, Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as the Government Company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the said land measuring 71.77 hectares or 177.34 acres and all rights in or over the said land so vested, shall with effect from the 18th May, 2019 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government, shall vest in the Government Company, subject to the following terms and conditions, namely:-

(1) the Government Company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages, etc. and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant laws;

(2) a Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the amounts payable by the Government Company under condition (1) and all expenditure incurred in connection with any such Tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be borne by the said Government Company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said land, so vested, shall also be borne by the Government Company;

(3) the Government Company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials regarding the rights in or over the said land so vested;

(4) the Government Company shall have no power to transfer the lands to any other persons without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and

(5) the Government Company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by

[F. No. 43015/25/2016-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

7294 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

पेट्रोलियमपेट्रोलियमपेट्रोलियमपेट्रोलियम औरऔरऔरऔर प्राकृ तिकप्राकृ तिकप्राकृ तिकप्राकृ तिक गैसगैसगैसगैस मंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 16 अक्तूबर, 2019

काकाकाका....आआआआ. 1871. 1871. 1871. 1871....————कें (cid:15)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक िहत में यह आवश्यक है कि आंz प्रदेश राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के िलए पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के cियान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप|रेशन िलिमटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;

और कें (cid:15)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के िलए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमी में जो इस से ऊपाब> अनुसूची में वyर्णत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार,पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए उस भूिम में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी lक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वyर्णत भूिम में हितब> है, उस तारीख से, िजसको इस अिधसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इ~ीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उसमें उपयोग के अिधकार के संबन्ध में (cid:127)ी बी. व(cid:128)कटेशु, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (आंz प्रदेश), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप|रेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन्स प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, चौथी मंिजल, एल.आई.सी. एनेक्सी भवन, थि~ना (डायमंड पार्क ) रोड़, आर.टी.सी. कॉम्पलेक्स के पास, िवशाखापटनम – 530004, आंz प्रदेश राज्य को िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला : िवशाखापटनम राज्य : आँ प्रदेश िजला : िवशाखापटनम िजला : िजला :
म म ं ं म म डल का नाम ं ं	!ाम का नाम	सव$ नम्बर	क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े
			ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े	एयरएयरएयरएयर	वगर्मीटर
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)

सब्बावरम नारापाड़(cid:129) 177 00 05 07

137/21 00 00 64

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पी. सोमाकु मार, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 16th October, 2019

S.O. 1871.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip- Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7295

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. B.Venkatesu, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh) Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 4th floor, LIC Annexe Building, Thikkana (Diamond Park) Road, Near RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam - 530004 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE
DISTRICT : VISAKHAPATNAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL	VILLAGE	SURVEY NO.	AREA
			Hectare	Are	Sq. Mt.
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)

SABBAVARAM NAARAPADU 177 00 05 07

137/21 00 00 64

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 अक्तूबर, 2019

काकाकाका....आआआआ.... 1872187218721872....————कें (cid:15)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंz प्रदेश राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के cियान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप|रेशन िलिमटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और कें (cid:15)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमी में जो इस से ऊपाब> अनुसूची में वyर्णत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी lक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वyर्णत भूमि में हितब> है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इ~ीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में (cid:127)ी बी. व(cid:128)कटेशु, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (आंz प्रदेश), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप|रेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन्स प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, चौथी मंजिल, एल.आई.सी. एनेक्सी भवन, थि~ना (डायमंड पार्क ) रोड़, आर.टी.सी. कॉम्पलेक्स के पास, िवशाखापटनम - 530004, आंz प्रदेश राज्य को िलिखत रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

िजला : ,ीकाकु लम राज्य आ ँ िजला : ,ीकाकु लम िजला : िजला : राज्य : : : : आँ प्रदेश आ आ प्रदेश ँ ँ
मंडल का नाम	!ाम!ाम!ाम!ाम का नाम का नाम	सव$सव$सव$सव$ नम्बर नम्बर	क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े
			ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े	एयरएयरएयरएयर	वगर्मीटर

(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)
कोटाबोम्मालि	क ु Lड़	512/7	0	0	66
		512/4F	0	0	97
		512/4D	0	0	34
		512/3B	0	1	77
		508/10	0	2	58
		508/16A	0	4	76
		508/9B	0	0	80
		507/5B	0	3	12
		507/3B	0	2	74
		507/3C	0	3	75
		507/3A	0	1	83
		438/8B	0	3	28
		438/6	0	0	3
		438/10	0	1	32
		438/11	0	1	8
		438/12	0	0	56
		439/3A	0	0	92
		439/3B	0	1	53
		439/5	0	2	67
		439/8	0	1	39
		439/9	0	0	56
		439/10	0	2	94
		433/11	0	0	42
		433/12	0	0	59
		433/10	0	0	58
		431/8	0	0	15
		401/8	0	0	25
		400/7	0	1	71
		399/7	0	0	96
		399/5	0	0	57
		399/3	0	1	64
		348/3	0	4	51
		353/8	0	2	87
		353/15	0	3	87
		353/11	0	2	33
		355/2	0	2	1
		355/1	0	2	97
		357/8	0	0	97
		357/4	0	0	51
		357/7	0	2	74
		357/6	0	3	14
		357/5	0	3	14
		379/14	0	2	3
		379/15	0	3	95
		379/16	0	3	34
		379/10	0	0	51
		379/17	0	0	71
		379/9	0	0	71
		380/11	0	0	51
		380/12	0	12	45
		383/8	0	1	9
		383/7	0	1	82
		382/13	0	2	81
		382/12	0	0	82
		380/10	0	4	77
		512/18C	0	0	81
		512/18B	0	0	61
		512/18A	0	0	61
		508/14D	0	0	41
		508/14A	0	0	21
		508/9D	0	5	27
		507/2	0	1	62
		353/13P	0	0	81
		353/5	0	0	71
		353/9P	0	1	2
		358/9	0	0	41

कोटाबोम्मालि	पाकिवलासा	23/5B	0	1	92
		23/3A	0	1	27
		23/3B	0	1	54
		23/13	0	3	14
		21/10	0	1	28
		21/9C	0	0	31
		21/5	0	0	26
		21/7	0	1	60
		41/4	0	2	86
		41/1	0	0	85
		42/17	0	0	26
		43/3A	0	0	4
		43/1	0	0	30
		43/2	0	1	62
		43/8	0	1	12
		49/1	0	2	53
		49/6	0	0	78
		49/8	0	0	61
		50/6	0	0	24
		50/7	0	2	99
		59/7	0	0	23
		59/4	0	2	44
		60/1	0	0	55
		60/5	0	0	82
		60/4	0	0	71
		61/1B	0	0	11
		61/7	0	0	21
		61/11B	0	1	60
		61/11C	0	0	1
		23/5C	0	0	81
		59/2	0	0	92
		59/6	0	1	22
		61/1A	0	0	21

कोटाबोम्मालि	मासाहेबपेटा	120/1	0	1	42
		120/3	0	2	2
		116/1	0	2	2
		116/2	0	0	62
		116/6	0	10	90
		113/4	0	0	54
		113/8	0	0	67
		113/9	0	1	60
		113/11	0	0	32
		113/12	0	0	72
		114/1	0	0	18
		160/4	0	9	57
		160/10	0	0	56
		154/11	0	0	37
		154/10	0	0	4
		154/13	0	0	94
		154/22	0	0	38
		154/17	0	0	8
		154/16	0	0	11
		154/15	0	0	6
		154/19	0	0	31
		155/13	0	0	5
		151/20C	0	0	11
		151/16	0	1	95
		151/12	0	0	62
		151/14	0	0	81
		151/6	0	0	34
		150/2A	0	0	98
		150/2B	0	0	85
		151/21P	0	0	41
कोटाबोम्मालि	पटुपुरम	181/15	0	1	86
		181/12	0	2	48
		181/13	0	0	27
		182/23	0	0	84
		182/18	0	0	3
		182/19	0	0	67
		474/7	0	0	15
		474/2	0	1	50
		474/1	0	0	95
		209/4	0	2	62
		473/4	0	1	42
		473/8	0	1	10
		473/9	0	0	71
		225/9	0	0	29
		225/3	0	0	98
		223/14	0	0	69
		223/13	0	0	47
		223/9	0	0	35
		223/12	0	0	35
		223/4	0	1	18
		222/1	0	0	18
		345	0	3	3
		344/13	0	2	7
		343/12	0	3	8
		341/12	0	1	32
		341/15	0	0	8
		350/3	0	5	96
		350/2	0	4	69
		352/5	0	1	54
		352/6	0	0	52
		352/15	0	1	54
		352/17	0	0	80
		352/19	0	1	33
		352/23	0	1	73
		352/22	0	0	20
		352/30	0	1	3
		352/32	0	1	74
		352/33	0	0	74
		352/34	0	0	71
		353/2	0	2	16
		353/8	0	0	1
		353/6	0	1	2
		353/13	0	0	2
		353/15	0	1	5
		353/17	0	0	14
		353/18	0	0	1
		354/11	0	1	7
		354/17	0	2	94
		403/11	0	0	92
		401/8	0	0	1
		404/7	0	2	25
		406	0	3	3
		437/7	0	4	5
		224/4	0	3	24
		354/15	0	0	41
		350/6	0	0	11
		342/14	0	0	21
		353/5	0	0	92
		353/3	0	0	51
		154/7	0	0	11
		343/11P	0	1	52
		154/2	0	2	23
		353/13	0	3	24
		153/9	0	0	41
		353/1	0	0	11
		401/5	0	22	6

कोटाबोम्मालि	विानाधापुरम	45/1	0	1	17
		45/5A	0	3	40
		41/10A	0	0	28
		41/10B	0	2	42
		41/7	0	0	30
		39/4	0	0	95
		39/8	0	0	6
		39/7	0	1	60
		35/2	0	0	15
		35/18	0	0	10
		20/17	0	0	84
		21/3A	0	0	91
		22/7	0	0	37
		22/16J	0	1	18
		23/10	0	0	6
		23/1	0	1	12
		12/20	0	0	51
		12/15	0	0	34
		13/2	0	2	66
		13/4	0	0	10
		20/19	0	4	46
		19	0	0	61
		20/16	0	2	74
		39/5	0	2	3
		22/8	0	2	84
		22/1	0	1	62
		22/11	0	0	61
		13/21A	0	0	21
		13/21B	0	2	43
		22/13A	0	1	2
		22/13B	0	0	81
		20/21	0	3	95
		41/9	0	0	11
		22/11	0	0	21

जलुमूL	तलातरिया	382/14	0	0	71
		382/15P	0	0	43
		382/13	0	1	14
		383/2	0	0	39
		383/5	0	0	8
		383/7	0	3	46
		385/9	0	0	11
		358/10	0	0	99
		385/1	0	0	51
		389/1	0	1	30
		387/4	0	1	52
		387/5	0	0	85
		387/6	0	0	3
		347/1	0	6	6
		347/2	0	1	75
		343/3	0	0	9
		343/7	0	0	3
		343/8	0	0	5
		343/1	0	3	6
		333/22	0	0	66
		333/11	0	0	66
		333/10	0	1	7
		333/12	0	0	13
		333/6	0	0	91
		333/5	0	0	67
		335/18	0	0	99
		335/21	0	0	47
		335/20	0	0	19
		335/14	0	0	15
		337/11	0	0	58
		335/11	0	0	66
		335/9	0	0	13
		336/2	0	1	55
		336/5	0	0	11
		336/1	0	1	71
		336/7	0	0	31
		392/2	0	2	84
		345/3	0	1	72
		345/6	0	6	88
		345/5	0	4	5
		346/2	0	12	35

कोटाबोम्मालि	आनंदापुरम	139/6	0	0	5
		140/1	0	3	64
		141/2	0	7	69
		142/1A	0	2	60
		128/9	0	1	40
		127/1	0	5	68
		127/3	0	2	4
		142/4	0	0	21

कोटाबोम्मालि	सौडाम	119	0	4	21
		118	0	0	51

जलुमूL	दरिवाड़ा	67/7	0	3	54
		113/8	0	2	94
		113/9	0	2	30
		111/4	0	3	5
		110/14	0	0	4
		109/7D	0	1	10
		108/9	0	1	2
		107/6P	0	1	2
		107/5	0	0	66
		107/7E	0	0	11
		115/4	0	10	12

जलुमूL	लिंगालावलासा	190/2	0	0	21
		187/9	0	0	60
		187/14	0	0	3
		187/13	0	0	8
		187/12	0	0	27
		179/7	0	9	26
		178/3	0	2	92
		197/2	0	0	88
		197/10	0	0	32
		178/17	0	1	67
		199/1	0	1	96
		200/3P	0	0	51
		200/5	0	0	41
		200/7	0	0	66
		200/10	0	0	35
		200/9	0	0	15
		354/6	0	0	70
		354/7	0	0	33
		354/8B	0	0	23
		354/8A	0	3	8
		354/10	0	0	6
		354/11A	0	1	32
		353/3A	0	0	31
		353/2	0	0	54
		350/1	0	0	7
		352/4	0	0	92
		351/7	0	1	44
		349/3	0	0	11
		187/18	0	0	11
		178/1	0	0	61

जलुमूL	राणा	174/4	0	2	51
		174/3	0	1	74
		174/2	0	5	79
		174/8	0	0	39
		173/1	0	1	12
		169/4	0	0	25
		170/8	0	0	10
		170/7	0	0	29
		170/3	0	1	15
		165/8P	0	2	79
		165/2	0	0	42
		165/1	0	2	1
		165/3	0	0	52
		165/4	0	0	54
		157/20	0	2	63
		157/19	0	3	87
		157/6	0	1	54
		156/2	0	4	10
		156/1	0	0	45
		156/4	0	4	7
		156/5	0	7	39
		149/22	0	1	8
		149/23	0	2	21
		149/27	0	8	63
		150/5	0	0	9
		150/4	0	0	13
		150/3	0	2	33
		150/2	0	2	28
		137/12	0	3	6
		137/10	0	1	19
		137/9	0	1	47
		137/2	0	0	94
		137/1	0	0	99
		138/4	0	0	37
		138/2	0	3	18
		138/7	0	2	49
		130/1	0	1	43
		130/4	0	6	51
		131/3	0	0	3
		128/15	0	0	65
		156/12	0	0	61
		156/6	0	0	11
		150/9	0	0	41
		150/6	0	3	4
		150/8	0	0	51

जलुमूL	प ेद्दादूगाम	76/26	0	2	11
		81/12C	0	2	70
		89/1	0	2	39
		85/2	0	2	73
		88	0	0	2
		141/11	0	1	56
		141/8	0	1	20
		142/2	0	0	2
		142/8	0	0	2
		144/12	0	1	58
		145/10	0	0	77
		145/11	0	0	41
		145/12	0	0	8
		145/13	0	4	49
		81/11	0	8	40
		79/8	0	2	84
		81/9	0	3	65
		79/7	0	1	72

जलुमूL	चिन्नादूगाम	17/1	0	0	81
		18/7	0	0	8
		18/6	0	0	26
		18/1	0	0	51
		27/2	0	3	34
		27/4	0	6	48
		25/1	0	7	80

जलुमूL	बिसवाड़ा	146/3	0	1	36
		146/4	0	0	60
		145/4	0	6	24
		145/5	0	1	13
		145/7	0	0	84
		142/6	0	0	67
		142/10A	0	2	56
		111/1	0	0	82
		110/2	0	0	36
		107/2	0	0	19
		149/7	0	3	24

कविटि	कारापाड़	28/2	0	9	13
		20/12	0	1	0
		20/13	0	0	12
		20/6	0	0	73
		30/17	0	1	8
		31/15	0	3	38
		33/5	0	2	11
		32/10	0	2	34
		46/3	0	1	12
		46/13	0	0	11
		46/19	0	0	91
		52/5	0	0	30
		52/12	0	0	4
		52/15	0	0	60
		52/18	0	0	17
		54/2	0	0	47
		55/2	0	0	44
		55/9	0	2	92
		91/8	0	1	87
		31/9	0	1	14
		31/10	0	0	46
		33/4	0	4	76
		34/6	0	0	57
		46/8	0	0	21
		46/14	0	0	50
		46/20	0	0	32
		46/27	0	0	44
		52/11	0	0	68
		46/18P	0	0	92
		57/1	0	0	11
		30/13	0	10	93
		55/13	0	0	11

कविटि	िसलागाम	15/1	0	3	54
		5	0	0	46
		14/2	0	4	25
		13/2	0	1	62

कविटि	ब ेलागाम	44/12	0	0	25
		44/10	0	1	17
		44/14	0	1	20
		44/16	0	2	11
		44/19	0	0	73
		59/3	0	2	20
		59/13	0	4	35
		60/11	0	0	52
		60/4	0	0	40
		60/2	0	0	1
		170/2	0	0	31
		170/3	0	0	1
		170/6	0	0	5
		170/7	0	0	11
		170/8	0	0	55
		170/21	0	1	57
		171/24	0	0	20
		171/20	0	2	0
		172/1	0	2	40
		174/1	0	1	71
		174/4	0	1	38
		191/4	0	2	3
		191/3	0	0	7
		191/2	0	2	24
		191/10	0	0	41
		193/13	0	0	21
		193/12	0	0	13
		193/11	0	0	89
		193/10	0	0	50
		192/2	0	0	49
		192/3	0	0	38
		192/4	0	0	20
		209/3	0	0	7
		209/6	0	0	8
		209/7	0	0	25
		209/14	0	0	15
		208/1	0	0	91
		208/2	0	0	27
		208/3	0	0	1
		208/5	0	0	36
		208/7	0	0	40
		208/8	0	0	52
		208/10	0	0	24
		208/11	0	0	5
		45	0	2	75
		60/8	0	0	30
		60/3	0	0	88
		170/1	0	2	10
		171/12	0	0	82
		171/11	0	2	48
		173/6	0	0	58
		173/4	0	1	29
		193/3	0	2	8
		192/1	0	0	1
		43/6	0	0	42
		36/10	0	0	29
		35/11	0	1	35
		32/14	0	0	57
		43/7	0	0	83
		35/17	0	1	28
		35/14	0	1	85
		37/1	0	0	59
		35/9	0	5	27
		32/20	0	1	40
		32/19	0	1	50
		170/18B	0	5	67
		59/12	0	0	11
		171/10	0	0	41
		173/13	0	2	23
		172/5	0	0	41
		173/12	0	0	41
		32/24	0	0	41
		33/2	0	2	64
		209/12	0	1	72
		174/2	0	1	52
		173/12	0	1	72
		171/19	0	0	71
		44/13	0	3	85

क ं िचिल	जाडुपूिड़	14/14	0	0	43
		14/13	0	0	92
		14/5	0	2	87
		15/5	0	0	3
		16/2	0	0	45
		16/1	0	0	78
		16/25	0	0	13
		12/17	0	0	61
		45/14	0	0	59
		45/15	0	0	43
		45/18	0	0	13
		45/17	0	0	2
		45/19	0	0	14
		45/20	0	0	46
		45/24	0	0	17
		52/18	0	0	31
		52/19	0	1	11
		51/8	0	0	12
		51/9	0	0	23
		60/10	0	0	33
		60/17	0	0	97
		60/15	0	1	34
		61/1	0	0	46
		61/5	0	0	18
		61/6	0	0	16
		62/3	0	0	12
		62/4	0	0	71
		294/4	0	1	18
		294/6	0	0	1
		301/17	0	0	29
		301/9	0	0	44
		301/8	0	0	7
		307/6	0	0	8
		307/7	0	1	12
		306/5	0	0	77
		315/1	0	0	70
		315/2	0	2	44
		15/2	0	0	21
		42/22	0	0	21
		14/10	0	0	21
		14/4	0	0	11
		52/2	0	0	11
		15/1	0	0	21
		45/8	0	0	11
		52/15	0	0	92
		15/3	0	0	81
		295/4	0	4	76
		14/3	0	1	52

क ं िचिल	बिन्नला कोत्तूL	334/8	0	0	24
		334/4	0	0	32
		334/3	0	0	2
		334/5	0	0	7
		334/6	0	0	17
		331/3	0	0	95
		331/5	0	1	62
		330/1	0	1	73
		331/11	0	2	3

क ं िचिल	कीसरिपाड़ा	484	0	1	85
		482/15	0	1	32
		483/3	0	1	33
		496/1	0	0	11
		496/2	0	0	68
		496/4	0	0	46
		496/5	0	0	31
		497/16	0	0	73
		498/1	0	2	49
		503/1	0	0	66
		504/17	0	0	17
		504/18	0	2	15
		504/14	0	0	85
		504/11	0	0	62
		504/12	0	0	34
		504/13	0	1	63
		506/14	0	0	73
		506/13	0	1	51
		519/4	0	0	13
		518/8	0	0	71
		518/5	0	0	58
		531/1	0	0	9
		532/9	0	2	96
		533/11	0	0	85
		533/9	0	1	14
		534/16	0	0	27
		534/15	0	1	68
		534/14	0	0	87
		535/10	0	1	15
		535/3	0	0	56
		483/11	0	0	31
		483/8	0	0	11
		518/7	0	0	11
		403/10	0	1	83
		533/12	0	0	21

क ं िचिल	जलंत्राकोटा	138/3	0	1	42
		137/3	0	3	83
		149/10	0	0	66
		149/2	0	6	63
		160/2	0	2	11
		160/4	0	0	39
		160/5	0	0	7
		165	0	13	80
		163/3	0	0	17
		164	0	6	21
		172	0	6	33
		138/2	0	2	94
		173/2	0	0	11
		131/1	0	7	49
		149/P	0	1	42
क ं िचिल	ज ेन्नागाया	30/6	0	1	49
		30/4	0	0	15
		30/18	0	1	30
		31/5	0	1	5
		34/4	0	0	64
		31/6	0	1	15
		34/10	0	0	51
		33/11	0	0	3
		32/1	0	0	41
		32/6	0	0	87
		32/7	0	1	31
		33/17	0	0	24
		65	0	8	69
		64/3	0	0	15
		64/2	0	2	66
		64/1	0	1	90
		63/3	0	0	84
		63/1	0	1	59
		54/2	0	1	0
		54/4	0	0	30
		54/3	0	0	28
		56/2	0	0	93
		53/4	0	0	31
		32/5	0	0	21

क ं िचिल	गोकर्नापुरम	42/8	0	0	21
		41/1	0	0	59
		41/5	0	0	79
		44/1	0	0	37
		44/10	0	0	31
		51/8	0	1	47
		51/7	0	0	62
		50/7	0	0	70
		49/8	0	2	96
		49/10	0	0	45
		71/18	0	0	34
		71/19	0	2	19
		44/8	0	6	99
		44/11	0	4	5
		44/9	0	4	46
		114/1	0	0	7
		109/1A	0	0	25
		107/4	0	2	64
		107/7A	0	0	74
		348/5B	0	0	3
		346/6d	0	3	13
		346/6A	0	1	2
		346/8	0	0	7
		109/10	0	1	62
		346/14	0	1	93

क ं िचिल	शासनाम	365/2	0	1	92
		371	0	19	29
		379/2B	0	1	8
		386	0	6	25
		374/4	0	11	74
स ंताबोम्मालि	ब ंदावनम ृ	36/6	00	01	62

इछापुरम	म ंडापल्लि	237/8	00	01	62
		116/1	00	04	45
		210/13	00	02	75
		176/12	00	01	52

न ंदिगाम	कोमाटूL	164/8	00	00	10

न ंदिगाम	लगिाम	21/1	00	02	83
		32/9	00	00	24
		30/3B	00	00	89
		39/1	00	00	28
		39/3	00	01	05

न ंदिगाम	संतोषापुरम	41/7	00	02	41

न ंदिगाम	कोंडातेंबूL	67/7	00	01	13
		67/3	00	01	05
		66/11	00	00	13
		61/8	00	00	69

न ंदिगाम	कोत्ताअहारम	40/4	00	02	94
		59/5	00	00	71
		58/10	00	00	20
		39/8	00	01	72

पलासा	कोयुजोला	297/10	00	00	81
पलासा	अड़विकोत्तूL	289/3	00	00	81
		228/2	00	00	40

पलासा	ब ंतुकोत्तूL	210	00	02	15

वापुकत्तूL	उ ं डLकु ड़िया	42/5	00	01	62
कविटि	कारापाड़	54/17	00	02	93
		20/11	00	02	02

7296 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7297 7298 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7299 7300 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7301 7302 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7303 7304 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7305 7306 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7307 7308 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7309 7310 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7311 7312 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7313 7314 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7315 7316 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7317 7318 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

पी. सोमाकु मार, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7319

New Delhi, the 16th October, 2019

S.O. 1872.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip- Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. B. Venkatesu, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh) Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 4th floor, LIC Annexe Building, Thikkana (Diamond Park) Road, Near RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam - 530004 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.

SCHEDULE

DISTRICT : SRIKAKULAM STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH
MANDAL	VILLAGE	SURVEY NO.	AREA
			Hectare	Are	Sq. Mt.
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)
KOTABOMMALI	KURUDU	512/7	0	0	66
		512/4F	0	0	97
		512/4D	0	0	34
		512/3B	0	1	77
		508/10	0	2	58
		508/16A	0	4	76
		508/9B	0	0	80
		507/5B	0	3	12
		507/3B	0	2	74
		507/3C	0	3	75
		507/3A	0	1	83
		438/8B	0	3	28
		438/6	0	0	3
		438/10	0	1	32
		438/11	0	1	8
		438/12	0	0	56
		439/3A	0	0	92
		439/3B	0	1	53
		439/5	0	2	67
		439/8	0	1	39
		439/9	0	0	56
		439/10	0	2	94
		433/11	0	0	42
		433/12	0	0	59
		433/10	0	0	58
		431/8	0	0	15
		401/8	0	0	25
		400/7	0	1	71
		399/7	0	0	96

(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)
		399/5	0	0	57
		399/3	0	1	64
		348/3	0	4	51
		353/8	0	2	87
		353/15	0	3	87
		353/11	0	2	33
		355/2	0	2	1
		355/1	0	2	97
		357/8	0	0	97
		357/4	0	0	51
		357/7	0	2	74
		357/6	0	3	14
		357/5	0	3	14
		379/14	0	2	3
		379/15	0	3	95
		379/16	0	3	34
		379/10	0	0	51
		379/17	0	0	71
		379/9	0	0	71
		380/11	0	0	51
		380/12	0	12	45
		383/8	0	1	9
		383/7	0	1	82
		382/13	0	2	81
		382/12	0	0	82
		380/10	0	4	77
		512/18C	0	0	81
		512/18B	0	0	61
		512/18A	0	0	61
		508/14D	0	0	41
		508/14A	0	0	21
		508/9D	0	5	27
		507/2	0	1	62
		353/13P	0	0	81
		353/5	0	0	71
		353/9P	0	1	2
		358/9	0	0	41

KOTABOMMALI	PAKIVALASA	23/5B	0	1	92
		23/3A	0	1	27
		23/3B	0	1	54
		23/13	0	3	14
		21/10	0	1	28
		21/9C	0	0	31
		21/5	0	0	26
		21/7	0	1	60
		41/4	0	2	86
		41/1	0	0	85
		42/17	0	0	26
		43/3A	0	0	4
		43/1	0	0	30
		43/2	0	1	62
		43/8	0	1	12
		49/1	0	2	53
		49/6	0	0	78
		49/8	0	0	61
		50/6	0	0	24
		50/7	0	2	99
		59/7	0	0	23
		59/4	0	2	44
		60/1	0	0	55
		60/5	0	0	82
		60/4	0	0	71
		61/1B	0	0	11
		61/7	0	0	21
		61/11B	0	1	60
		61/11C	0	0	1
		23/5C	0	0	81
		59/2	0	0	92
		59/6	0	1	22
		61/1A	0	0	21

KOTABOMMALI	MASAHABPETA	120/1	0	1	42
		120/3	0	2	2
		116/1	0	2	2
		116/2	0	0	62
		116/6	0	10	90
		113/4	0	0	54
		113/8	0	0	67
		113/9	0	1	60
		113/11	0	0	32
		113/12	0	0	72
		114/1	0	0	18
		160/4	0	9	57
		160/10	0	0	56
		154/11	0	0	37
		154/10	0	0	4
		154/13	0	0	94
		154/22	0	0	38
		154/17	0	0	8
		154/16	0	0	11
		154/15	0	0	6
		154/19	0	0	31
		155/13	0	0	5
		151/20C	0	0	11
		151/16	0	1	95
		151/12	0	0	62
		151/14	0	0	81
		151/6	0	0	34
		150/2A	0	0	98
		150/2B	0	0	85
		151/21P	0	0	41

KOTABOMMALI	PATTUPURAM	181/15	0	1	86
		181/12	0	2	48
		181/13	0	0	27
		182/23	0	0	84
		182/18	0	0	3
		182/19	0	0	67
		474/7	0	0	15
		474/2	0	1	50
		474/1	0	0	95
		209/4	0	2	62
		473/4	0	1	42
		473/8	0	1	10
		473/9	0	0	71
		225/9	0	0	29
		225/3	0	0	98
		223/14	0	0	69
		223/13	0	0	47
		223/9	0	0	35
		223/12	0	0	35
		223/4	0	1	18
		222/1	0	0	18
		345	0	3	3
		344/13	0	2	7
		343/12	0	3	8
		341/12	0	1	32
		341/15	0	0	8
		350/3	0	5	96
		350/2	0	4	69
		352/5	0	1	54
		352/6	0	0	52
		352/15	0	1	54
		352/17	0	0	80
		352/19	0	1	33
		352/23	0	1	73
		352/22	0	0	20
		352/30	0	1	3
		352/32	0	1	74
		352/33	0	0	74
		352/34	0	0	71
		353/2	0	2	16
		353/8	0	0	1
		353/6	0	1	2
		353/13	0	0	2
		353/15	0	1	5
		353/17	0	0	14
		353/18	0	0	1
		354/11	0	1	7
		354/17	0	2	94
		403/11	0	0	92
		401/8	0	0	1
		404/7	0	2	25
		406	0	3	3
		437/7	0	4	5
		224/4	0	3	24
		354/15	0	0	41
		350/6	0	0	11
		342/14	0	0	21
		353/5	0	0	92
		353/3	0	0	51
		154/7	0	0	11
		343/11P	0	1	52
		154/2	0	2	23
		353/13	0	3	24
		153/9	0	0	41
		353/1	0	0	11
		401/5	0	22	6

KOTABOMMALI	VISWANADHAPURAM	45/1	0	1	17
		45/5A	0	3	40
		41/10A	0	0	28
		41/10B	0	2	42
		41/7	0	0	30
		39/4	0	0	95
		39/8	0	0	6
		39/7	0	1	60
		35/2	0	0	15
		35/18	0	0	10
		20/17	0	0	84
		21/3A	0	0	91
		22/7	0	0	37
		22/16J	0	1	18
		23/10	0	0	6
		23/1	0	1	12
		12/20	0	0	51
		12/15	0	0	34
		13/2	0	2	66
		13/4	0	0	10
		20/19	0	4	46
		19	0	0	61
		20/16	0	2	74
		39/5	0	2	3
		22/8	0	2	84
		22/1	0	1	62
		22/11	0	0	61
		13/21A	0	0	21
		13/21B	0	2	43
		22/13A	0	1	2
		22/13B	0	0	81
		20/21	0	3	95
		41/9	0	0	11
		22/11	0	0	21

JALUMURU	TALATARIA	382/14	0	0	71
		382/15P	0	0	43
		382/13	0	1	14
		383/2	0	0	39
		383/5	0	0	8
		383/7	0	3	46
		385/9	0	0	11
		358/10	0	0	99
		385/1	0	0	51
		389/1	0	1	30
		387/4	0	1	52
		387/5	0	0	85
		387/6	0	0	3
		347/1	0	6	6
		347/2	0	1	75
		343/3	0	0	9
		343/7	0	0	3
		343/8	0	0	5
		343/1	0	3	6
		333/22	0	0	66
		333/11	0	0	66
		333/10	0	1	7
		333/12	0	0	13
		333/6	0	0	91
		333/5	0	0	67
		335/18	0	0	99
		335/21	0	0	47
		335/20	0	0	19
		335/14	0	0	15
		337/11	0	0	58
		335/11	0	0	66
		335/9	0	0	13
		336/2	0	1	55
		336/5	0	0	11
		336/1	0	1	71
		336/7	0	0	31
		392/2	0	2	84
		345/3	0	1	72
		345/6	0	6	88
		345/5	0	4	5
		346/2	0	12	35

KOTABOMMALI	ANANDAPURAM	139/6	0	0	5
		140/1	0	3	64
		141/2	0	7	69
		142/1A	0	2	60
		128/9	0	1	40
		127/1	0	5	68
		127/3	0	2	4
		142/4	0	0	21

KOTABOMMALI	SOUDAM	119	0	4	21
		118	0	0	51

JALUMURU	DARIVADA	67/7	0	3	54
		113/8	0	2	94
		113/9	0	2	30
		111/4	0	3	5
		110/14	0	0	4
		109/7D	0	1	10
		108/9	0	1	2
		107/6P	0	1	2
		107/5	0	0	66
		107/7E	0	0	11
		115/4	0	10	12

JALUMURU	LINGALAVALASA	190/2	0	0	21
		187/9	0	0	60
		187/14	0	0	3
		187/13	0	0	8
		187/12	0	0	27
		179/7	0	9	26
		178/3	0	2	92
		197/2	0	0	88
		197/10	0	0	32
		178/17	0	1	67
		199/1	0	1	96
		200/3P	0	0	51
		200/5	0	0	41
		200/7	0	0	66
		200/10	0	0	35
		200/9	0	0	15
		354/6	0	0	70
		354/7	0	0	33
		354/8B	0	0	23
		354/8A	0	3	8
		354/10	0	0	6
		354/11A	0	1	32
		353/3A	0	0	31
		353/2	0	0	54
		350/1	0	0	7
		352/4	0	0	92
		351/7	0	1	44
		349/3	0	0	11
		187/18	0	0	11
		178/1	0	0	61

JALUMURU	RANA	174/4	0	2	51
		174/3	0	1	74
		174/2	0	5	79
		174/8	0	0	39
		173/1	0	1	12
		169/4	0	0	25
		170/8	0	0	10
		170/7	0	0	29
		170/3	0	1	15
		165/8P	0	2	79
		165/2	0	0	42
		165/1	0	2	1
		165/3	0	0	52
		165/4	0	0	54
		157/20	0	2	63
		157/19	0	3	87
		157/6	0	1	54
		156/2	0	4	10
		156/1	0	0	45
		156/4	0	4	7
		156/5	0	7	39
		149/22	0	1	8
		149/23	0	2	21
		149/27	0	8	63
		150/5	0	0	9
		150/4	0	0	13
		150/3	0	2	33
		150/2	0	2	28
		137/12	0	3	6
		137/10	0	1	19
		137/9	0	1	47
		137/2	0	0	94
		137/1	0	0	99
		138/4	0	0	37
		138/2	0	3	18
		138/7	0	2	49
		130/1	0	1	43
		130/4	0	6	51
		131/3	0	0	3
		128/15	0	0	65
		156/12	0	0	61
		156/6	0	0	11
		150/9	0	0	41
		150/6	0	3	4
		150/8	0	0	51

JALUMURU	PEDDADUGAM	76/26	0	2	11
		81/12C	0	2	70
		89/1	0	2	39
		85/2	0	2	73
		88	0	0	2
		141/11	0	1	56
		141/8	0	1	20
		142/2	0	0	2
		142/8	0	0	2
		144/12	0	1	58
		145/10	0	0	77
		145/11	0	0	41
		145/12	0	0	8
		145/13	0	4	49
		81/11	0	8	40
		79/8	0	2	84
		81/9	0	3	65
		79/7	0	1	72

JALUMURU	CHINNA DUGAM	17/1	0	0	81
		18/7	0	0	8
		18/6	0	0	26
		18/1	0	0	51
		27/2	0	3	34
		27/4	0	6	48
		25/1	0	7	80

JALUMURU	BASIVADA	146/3	0	1	36
		146/4	0	0	60
		145/4	0	6	24
		145/5	0	1	13
		145/7	0	0	84
		142/6	0	0	67
		142/10A	0	2	56
		111/1	0	0	82
		110/2	0	0	36
		107/2	0	0	19
		149/7	0	3	24

KAVITI	KARAPADU	28/2	0	9	13
		20/12	0	1	0
		20/13	0	0	12
		20/6	0	0	73
		30/17	0	1	8
		31/15	0	3	38
		33/5	0	2	11
		32/10	0	2	34
		46/3	0	1	12
		46/13	0	0	11
		46/19	0	0	91
		52/5	0	0	30
		52/12	0	0	4
		52/15	0	0	60
		52/18	0	0	17
		54/2	0	0	47
		55/2	0	0	44
		55/9	0	2	92
		91/8	0	1	87
		31/9	0	1	14
		31/10	0	0	46
		33/4	0	4	76
		34/6	0	0	57
		46/8	0	0	21
		46/14	0	0	50
		46/20	0	0	32
		46/27	0	0	44
		52/11	0	0	68
		46/18P	0	0	92
		57/1	0	0	11
		30/13	0	10	93
		55/13	0	0	11

KAVITI	SILAGAM	15/1	0	3	54
		5	0	0	46
		14/2	0	4	25
		13/2	0	1	62

KAVITI	BELAGAUM	44/12	0	0	25
		44/10	0	1	17
		44/14	0	1	20
		44/16	0	2	11
		44/19	0	0	73
		59/3	0	2	20
		59/13	0	4	35
		60/11	0	0	52
		60/4	0	0	40
		60/2	0	0	1
		170/2	0	0	31
		170/3	0	0	1
		170/6	0	0	5
		170/7	0	0	11
		170/8	0	0	55
		170/21	0	1	57
		171/24	0	0	20
		171/20	0	2	0
		172/1	0	2	40
		174/1	0	1	71
		174/4	0	1	38
		191/4	0	2	3
		191/3	0	0	7
		191/2	0	2	24
		191/10	0	0	41
		193/13	0	0	21
		193/12	0	0	13
		193/11	0	0	89
		193/10	0	0	50
		192/2	0	0	49
		192/3	0	0	38
		192/4	0	0	20
		209/3	0	0	7
		209/6	0	0	8
		209/7	0	0	25
		209/14	0	0	15
		208/1	0	0	91
		208/2	0	0	27
		208/3	0	0	1
		208/5	0	0	36
		208/7	0	0	40
		208/8	0	0	52
		208/10	0	0	24
		208/11	0	0	5
		45	0	2	75
		60/8	0	0	30
		60/3	0	0	88
		170/1	0	2	10
		171/12	0	0	82
		171/11	0	2	48
		173/6	0	0	58
		173/4	0	1	29
		193/3	0	2	8
		192/1	0	0	1
		43/6	0	0	42
		36/10	0	0	29
		35/11	0	1	35
		32/14	0	0	57
		43/7	0	0	83
		35/17	0	1	28
		35/14	0	1	85
		37/1	0	0	59
		35/9	0	5	27
		32/20	0	1	40
		32/19	0	1	50
		170/18B	0	5	67
		59/12	0	0	11
		171/10	0	0	41
		173/13	0	2	23
		172/5	0	0	41
		173/12	0	0	41
		32/24	0	0	41
		33/2	0	2	64
		209/12	0	1	72
		174/2	0	1	52
		173/12	0	1	72
		171/19	0	0	71
		44/13	0	3	85

KAVITI	JADUPUDI	14/14	0	0	43
		14/13	0	0	92
		14/5	0	2	87
		15/5	0	0	3
		16/2	0	0	45
		16/1	0	0	78
		16/25	0	0	13
		12/17	0	0	61
		45/14	0	0	59
		45/15	0	0	43
		45/18	0	0	13
		45/17	0	0	2
		45/19	0	0	14
		45/20	0	0	46
		45/24	0	0	17
		52/18	0	0	31
		52/19	0	1	11
		51/8	0	0	12
		51/9	0	0	23
		60/10	0	0	33
		60/17	0	0	97
		60/15	0	1	34
		61/1	0	0	46
		61/5	0	0	18
		61/6	0	0	16
		62/3	0	0	12
		62/4	0	0	71
		294/4	0	1	18
		294/6	0	0	1
		301/17	0	0	29
		301/9	0	0	44
		301/8	0	0	7
		307/6	0	0	8
		307/7	0	1	12
		306/5	0	0	77
		315/1	0	0	70
		315/2	0	2	44
		15/2	0	0	21
		42/22	0	0	21
		14/10	0	0	21
		14/4	0	0	11
		52/2	0	0	11
		15/1	0	0	21
		45/8	0	0	11
		52/15	0	0	92
		15/3	0	0	81
		295/4	0	4	76
		14/3	0	1	52

KAVITI	BHINNALAKOTTURU	334/8	0	0	24
		334/4	0	0	32
		334/3	0	0	2
		334/5	0	0	7
		334/6	0	0	17
		331/3	0	0	95
		331/5	0	1	62
		330/1	0	1	73
		331/11	0	2	3

KANCHILI	KISARIPADA	484	0	1	85
		482/15	0	1	32
		483/3	0	1	33
		496/1	0	0	11
		496/2	0	0	68
		496/4	0	0	46
		496/5	0	0	31
		497/16	0	0	73
		498/1	0	2	49
		503/1	0	0	66
		504/17	0	0	17
		504/18	0	2	15
		504/14	0	0	85
		504/11	0	0	62
		504/12	0	0	34
		504/13	0	1	63
		506/14	0	0	73
		506/13	0	1	51
		519/4	0	0	13
		518/8	0	0	71
		518/5	0	0	58
		531/1	0	0	9
		532/9	0	2	96
		533/11	0	0	85
		533/9	0	1	14
		534/16	0	0	27
		534/15	0	1	68
		534/14	0	0	87
		535/10	0	1	15
		535/3	0	0	56
		483/11	0	0	31
		483/8	0	0	11
		518/7	0	0	11
		403/10	0	1	83
		533/12	0	0	21

KANCHILI	JALANTRAKOTA	138/3	0	1	42
		137/3	0	3	83
		149/10	0	0	66
		149/2	0	6	63
		160/2	0	2	11
		160/4	0	0	39
		160/5	0	0	7
		165	0	13	80
		163/3	0	0	17
		164	0	6	21
		172	0	6	33
		138/2	0	2	94
		173/2	0	0	11
		131/1	0	7	49
		149/P	0	1	42

KANCHILI	JENNAGAYA	30/6	0	1	49
		30/4	0	0	15
		30/18	0	1	30
		31/5	0	1	5
		34/4	0	0	64
		31/6	0	1	15
		34/10	0	0	51
		33/11	0	0	3
		32/1	0	0	41
		32/6	0	0	87
		32/7	0	1	31
		33/17	0	0	24
		65	0	8	69
		64/3	0	0	15
		64/2	0	2	66
		64/1	0	1	90
		63/3	0	0	84
		63/1	0	1	59
		54/2	0	1	0
		54/4	0	0	30
		54/3	0	0	28
		56/2	0	0	93
		53/4	0	0	31
		32/5	0	0	21

KANCHILI	GOKARNAPURAM	42/8	0	0	21
		41/1	0	0	59
		41/5	0	0	79
		44/1	0	0	37
		44/10	0	0	31
		51/8	0	1	47
		51/7	0	0	62
		50/7	0	0	70
		49/8	0	2	96
		49/10	0	0	45
		71/18	0	0	34
		71/19	0	2	19
		44/8	0	6	99
		44/11	0	4	5
		44/9	0	4	46
		114/1	0	0	7
		109/1A	0	0	25
		107/4	0	2	64
		107/7A	0	0	74
		348/5B	0	0	3
		346/6d	0	3	13
		346/6A	0	1	2
		346/8	0	0	7
		109/10	0	1	62
		346/14	0	1	93

KANCHILI	SASANAM	365/2	0	1	92
		371	0	19	29
		379/2B	0	1	8
		386	0	6	25
		374/4	0	11	74
SANTHA BOMMALI	BRUNDAVANAM	36/6	00	01	62

ICHCHAPURAM	MANDAPALLI	237/8	00	01	62
		116/1	00	04	45
		210/13	00	02	75
		176/12	00	01	52

NANDIGAM	KOMATURU	164/8	00	00	10

NANDIGAM	LATTIGAM	21/1	00	02	83
		32/9	00	00	24
		30/3B	00	00	89
		39/1	00	00	28
		39/3	00	01	05

NANDIGAM	SANTOSAPURAM	41/7	00	02	41

NANDIGAM	KONDA THEMBURU	67/7	00	01	13
		67/3	00	01	05
		66/11	00	00	13
		61/8	00	00	69

NANDIGAM	KOTTA AGRAHARAM	40/4	00	02	94
		59/5	00	00	71
		58/10	00	00	20
		39/8	00	01	72
PALASA	KOYUJOLA	297/10	00	00	81

PALASA	ADIVIKOTTURU	289/3	00	00	81
		228/2	00	00	40

PALASA	BANTU KOTTURU	210	00	02	15

VAJRAPUKATHURU	UNDRUKUDIYA	42/5	00	01	62

KAVITI	KARAPADU	54/17	00	02	93
		20/11	00	02	02

7320 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7321 7322 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7323 7324 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7325 7326 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7327 7328 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7329 7330 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7331 7332 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7333 7334 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[F. No. R-11025(11)252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

P. SOMAKUMAR Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 अक्तूबर, 2019

dk-vk- 1873-&dsUnzh ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd rfeyukMw jkT; ds lsye dks dsjy jkT; esa Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM+ dh dksfPp fjQkbujh ls rjyhd`r isVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy,] ,d ikbiykbZu dksfPp lsye ikbiykbZu çkbosV fyfeVsM+ }kjk fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,(

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa] tks blls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk,( vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] IksVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½] dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk "kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk"k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS(

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds jkti= dh izfr;k¡ lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus ds fy;s mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh c'khjdqatw ,] l{ke çkf/kdkjh] dksfPp lsye ikbi ykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM] d#.k ,aDyso] f}rh; ry] Mksj ua- ch& 2] ,l ,u taD'ku] fjQkbZujh jksM] ;wfu;u cSad v'Q bafM;k ds lkeus] f=iqfuFkqjk] ftyk ,sjukdqye] dsjy & 682301 dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA

vuqlwph

jkT;: dsjy ftyk: f='kwj rkyqd: f='kwj

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

ekjrDdjk ¼[k.M la- 72½                 108@5                  0              01                40
                                       108@20                 0              00                60
jkT;:  dsjy                            ftyk:  ,sjukdqye                     rkyqd:  vkyqok

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

rsDdqEckxe ¼[k.M la- 30½ 239@5 0 01 00

[Qk- la- vkj&12031@196@2017&vksvkj-I/bZ-19746]

Ikh- lksekdqekj] voj lfpo[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7335

New Delhi, the 16th October, 2019

S.O. 1873.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in the State of Kerala to Salem in the State of Tamil Nadu and that the a pipeline should be laid by M/S Kochi – Salem pipeline Private Ltd;

And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the lands under which such pipelines are proposed to be laid described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now therefore in the exercise of powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (Central Act 50 of 1962) the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person, interested in land described in the said schedule may, within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying or the pipeline under the land to Sri. Basheerkunju. A, Competent Authority, Kochi-Salem Pipeline Private Ltd, Karun Enclave 2nd floor, Door No. B2, S.N. Junction, Refinery Road, Tripunithura, Pin – 682 301.

SCHEDULE

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : THRISSUR TALUK : THRISSUR

VILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

MARATHAKKARA
BLOCK NO. 72               108/5             0                 01          40
                           108/20            0                 00          60

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : ERNAKULAM TALUK : ALUVA

VILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

THEKKUMBHAGAM

BLOCK NO. 30 239/5 0 01 00

[F. No. R-12031/196/2017-OR-I/E-19746]

P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 16 vDrwcj] 2019

dk-vk- 1874-&dsUnzh ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko";d izrhr gksrk gS fd rfeyukMw jkT; ds lsye dks dsjy jkT; esa Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM+ dh dksfPp fjQkbujh ls rjyhd`r isVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy,] ,d ikbiykbZu dksfPp lsye ikbiykbZu çkbosV fyfeVsM+ }kjk fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,;

vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko";d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa] tks blls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk, ; vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] IksVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½] dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk "kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk"k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS;

dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds jkti= dh izfr;k¡ lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus ds fy;s mles mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh c'khjdqatw ,] l{ke çkf/kdkjh] dksfPp lsye ikbi ykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM] d#.k ,aDyso] f}rh; ry] Mksj ua- ch& 2] ,l ,u taD'ku] fjQkbZujh jksM] ;wfu;u cSad v'Q bafM;k ds lkeus] f=iqfuFkqjk] ftyk ,sjukdqye] dsjy & 682301 dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA7336 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] vuqlwph

jkT;: dsjy ftyk: ,sjukdqye rkyqd: dqUukFkqukMw

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

dqUukFkqukMw ¼[kaM la 36 ½              16@3                   0                 05          00
                                        16@4                   0                 08          75
                                        17@2                   0                 03          00
                                        17@3                   0                 08          40
                                        17@4                   0                 07          20
                                        18@1                   0                 01          70
                                        18@6                   0                 04          50
                                        22@1                   0                 03          70
                                        22@2                   0                 03          90
jkT;:  dsjy                             ftyk:  ,sjukdqy                          rkyqd:  vkyqok

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

vaxekyh ¼[k.M la- 12½                      110@6                   0                 01            00
ewDdUuwj ¼[k.M la- 15½                     21@5                    0                 00            41
jkT;:  dsjy                                ftyk:  f='kwj                             rkyqd:  pkyDdqMh

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

dkYywj rsDdqeqjhZ

311@6 0 09 50 jkT;: dsjy

ftyk: f='kwj rkyqd: eqdqaniqje

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

ikjkiwDdkjk                              874@1                  0                 03           00
                                         877@1                  0                 06           90

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7337

jkT;: dsjy

ftyk: ikykdkM rkyqd: ikykdkM

uke xzke	losZ uEcj	{ks=Qy ¼vuqekfur½
		gsDVs;j	,fj;k	Áfr oxZehVj

dUukMh II ¼[kaM la 50 ½                     487@18                   0                  01            04
iqFkqLlsjh e/;  ¼[kaM la 34 ½               560@2 ihVh               0                  09            22
                                            560@3 ihVh               0                  00            81

[Qk- la- vkj&12031@¼196½@2017&vksvkj-I/bZ-19746]

Ikh- lksekdqekj] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 16th October, 2019

S.O. No. 1874.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in the State of Kerala to Salem in the State of Tamil Nadu and that the a pipeline should be laid by M/S Kochi – Salem pipeline Private Ltd;

SCHEDULE

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : ERNAKULAM TALUK : KUNNATHUNADU

VILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

KUNNATHUNADU
BLOCK NO. 36                       16/3             0                  05              00
                                   16/4             0                  08              75
                                   17/2             0                  03              00
                                   17/3             0                  08              40
                                   17/4             0                  07              20
                                   18/1             0                  01              70
                                   18/6             0                  04              50
                                   22/1             0                  03              70
                                   22/2             0                  03              90

7338 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

VILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

ANGAMALY
BLOCK. NO. 12                  110/6          0                01             00
MOOKKANNOOR
BLOCK No. 15                   21/5           0                00             41

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : THRISSUR TALUK : CHALAKUDY

VILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

KALLOOR THEKKUMMURI 311/6 0 09 50

STATE : KERALA

DISTRICT : THRISSUR TALUK : MUKUNDAPURAM

V ILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

PARAPPUKKARA                     874/1          0                 03             00
                                 877/1          0                 06             90

STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : PALAKKAD TALUK : PALAKKAD

VILLAGE	SURVEY NUMBERS	AREA (APPROXIMATE)
		HECTARES	ARES	SQ:METERS

KANNADI - II BLOCK NO. 50 487/18 0 01 04

PUDUSSERY CENTRAL BLOCK. NO.34 560/2pt 0 09 22

560/3pt 0 00 81

[F. No. R-12031 (196)/2017-OR-I/E-19746]

P. SOMAKUMAR Under Secy.

(cid:20)म एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय (cid:20)म एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय (cid:20)म एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय (cid:20)म एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1875187518751875....————औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार मेसर्स ओरिएंटल इंश्योरेंस कं पनी लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संब> नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में नि(cid:143)र्दष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं (cid:127)म न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 3/2012) को प्रकाशित करती है जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार को 14.10.2019 को प्राप्त 1आ था।

[सं. एल-17011/1/2011-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के . िहमांशु, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7339

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019

S.O. 1875.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 3/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14.10.2019.

[No. L-17011/1/2011-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/3 of 2012

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

M/S. ORIENTAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

The Regional Manager M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai Regional Office No.2, Oriental House, 7th Floor, 7, Jamshedji Tata Road, Churchgate,Mumbai – 400 020.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

The Joint Secretary, General Insurance Employees' Union, Sterling Cinema Building, 3rd Floor, 65, Murzban Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER             :      Mr. Manoj M. Gujar,  Advocate
FOR THE WORKMEN              :      Mr. J.H. Sawant, Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 12th September, 2019

AWARD PART–I I

1. This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-17011/1/2011 – IR (M) dated 18.01.2012. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :

"Whether the action of management of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai in imposing the penalty of

reduction of pay scale by two stages and recovery of legal fees and other expenses amounting to Rs.12,800/- on

Shri P.J. Rakshe, Record Clerk is legal, just and proper ? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?''

2. After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices. They appeared through their respective representatives.

3. The concerned workman has filed statement of claim Ex.7. According to the second party workman he is a permanent of first party management. He has been appointed by the first party management w.e.f. 10.6.1987. He has been working in the promotional post of Record Clerk. He was informed by letter dated 28.4.2006 that the departmental enquiry would be held against him under Rule 25 of General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975. He was served with the charge sheet for alleged misconduct that while he was posted and functioning as Record Clerk in the Division office, Dadar during the year 2001, he committed misconduct to the effect that he with malafide intention7340 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] went to Division office of Ghatkopar on 10.10.2001 to get the policy No. 31/2001/01905 expired on 16.7.2001 belonging to Shri Daulat S. Narwade, renewed, he unauthorisedly put the date stamp on the date and stamp on the above office policy docket with date showing 9.10.2001 and put remarks "Please correct period and date" in order to bring the accidental vehicle within purview of Insurance Policy No. 31/2002/03886 and thereby exposed the first party to bear unwarranted T.P. liability vide MACT Case No. 2731/2001 arisen out of accident of vehicle No. MH-3-F 673 on 9.10.2001 causing injury to a third party and thus by his above act failed to maintain absolute integrity, devotion to duty, exhibited the conduct unbecoming of a public servant and acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the company, thereby violated Rule 3 (1) (i) (ii) (iii) Rule 4 (1), (5) of General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975.

4. According to the concerned workman, he had denied the charges leveled against him by his letter dated 9.6.2006. However, the enquiry proceedings were held on 10.7.2008 and 31.7.2008 before the Enquiry officer Smt. Sunita Ingle, Assistant Manager of the First party and thereafter the first party without considering the submission made by him vide his letter dated 3.11.09 imposed punishment of reducing his two increments.

5. According to the concerned workman, the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his report in haste and without considering all the facts on record. The principles of natural justice were not followed while conducting the enquiry. As such the enquiry is bad in law and is liable to the set aside.

6. It is also the contention of the concerned workman that the charge sheet has been issued under General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 which have no force of law. The first party is governed by the Industrial Employment (Standing) Orders Act, 1946 and the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946. There are no certified orders for the establishment of the first party. Similarly, the establishment of the first party is not exempted by the Central Government from the Industrial Employment (Standing) Orders Act, 1946. Therefore Model Standing Orders (Central) as prescribed in Schedule I to the Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946 have no application. Since the charge sheet has not been issued nor the disciplinary proceedings have been initiated and conducted in accordance with Model Standing Orders (Central) Schedule I, the disciplinary action taken against him is liable to be quashed.

7. It is also the contention of the concerned workman that Mr. J.H. Kasar and W.G. Mhatre were present in the enquiry held on 1.9.09 as charge sheeted employees and Mr. Jai Kumar and Mr. Bipin Navsariwala were present in the said enquiry as Defence Assistant. Presenting Officer put leading questions to Mr. Ajay R. Pote, Vigilance officer of the first party. Such action of the Enquiry officer to put the leading questions to the witnesses is against the principles of natural justice.

8. It is then contended that the hand writing expert was not examined during in the enquiry proceedings and no second opinion from the hand writing expert approved by the government was obtained by the Enquiry officer who relied upon the hand writing expert opinion and no opportunity was given to him to examine the hand writing expert. As such the findings of the Enquiry officer are perverse. The punishment imposed of reduction of pay by two stages and recovery of legal fees and other expenses amounting to Rs.12,800/- on the second party is illegal, unjust and improper. He is therefore asking for giving directions to the first party to make the payment of wages and other benefits to him without any reduction of pay and without any recovery of his wages as if no such punishment has been imposed upon him. He is also asking for directions to the first party to make the payment of arrears with interest @ 10% retrospectively.

9. The first party management resisted the claim by filing written statement Ex.14. It is contended that the second party workman was employed with the first party as Record Clerk at their Dadar Division office during the relevant period. He during working hours without any intimation and / or permission of his superiors had gone to Division office of the first party situated at Ghatkopar on 10.10.2001. The second party workman made the endorsement on expired policy No. 31/2001/1905 in the arbitrary manner with a view to renew policy in favour of Shri D.S. Narwade. The concerned workman unauthorisedly put the date stamp on the policy docket with the date showing 09.01.2001 and put remarks "Please correct period and date" in order to bring the accidental vehicle of Mr. D.S. Narwade within the purview of the expired Insurance Policy and thereby exposed the first party to bear unwarranted Third Party liability and release the amount. The said action of the second party incurred the first party with financial losses as such the second party acted dishonestly with first party company. Accordingly, he was charge-sheeted. Charge sheet was issued on 28.4.2006. He received the charge sheet and replied the same vide his letter dt. 9.6.2006. The management of the first party decided to institute disciplinary action against the second party. Accordingly, domestic enquiry was initiated and conducted by the first party into the charges leveled against him as provided under General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975.

7. It is the case of the first party management that Mr. S.K. Basu was appointed as Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry in an impartial manner from 29.7.2009 to 1.9.2009 and full opportunity to defend the case was given to the second party by the Enquiry Officer. The second party participated in the said proceedings and fully defended himself. As such the enquiry held against the second party is fair, proper and legal.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7341

8. It is also the case of the first party management that Enquiry Officer submitted his report and findings dt. 21.10.2009 to the management and has held that the charges leveled against the second party are duly proved and second party is guilty of charges. Copy of the same was given to the second party. Entire due process of law was completed. The report of the Enquiry Officer is based on evidence. Copy of the enquiry report was given to the second party and he has replied the same vide his letter dt. 3.11.2009. As such the first party complied with the entire process of law before awarding punishment to the second party. Accordingly, after considering the entire records and findings of the Enquiry Officer as well as the past service record of the second party, the first party passed order dt. 27.1.2010 and 8.2.2010 against the second party and punished him by imposing penalty of reduction of pay scale by two stages and recovery of legal fees and other expenses amounting to Rs.12,800/-.

9. It is thus the case of the first party management that the enquiry held against the concerned workman was fair and proper and the findings of the Enquiry officer are based on evidence. First party management thus sought dismissal of the reference.

10. This tribunal has passed Award Part – I on 30.10.2017 holding thereby that the Enquiry is fair and proper and the Findings of the Inquiry Officer are not perverse. Parties are directed to argue / lead evidence on the point of quantum of punishment.

11. Thereafter parties have adduced the evidence. I heard the arguments of both the parties. In view of their submissions, I reproduce the following issues at Ex.9 along with my findings thereon for the reasons stated below :

Sr. No.	Issues	Findings
3.	Whether the punishment of reducing pay scale by two stages and recovery of legal fees and other expenses Rs.12,800/- is shockingly disproportionate ?	No
4.	What relief the workman is entitled to ?	No
5.	What order ?	As per final order

Reasons

ISSUE NO. 3:-

12. The concerned workman has filed affidavit Ex. 43 reiterating that enquiry was not fair & proper. However, in his cross examination he has admitted that he raised his grievance before the Enquiry Officer in respect of which he has stated in his affidavit and EO has given his report on the basis of evidence on record. He thus admits that the findings of the EO are based on evidence.

13. Even then the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the EO closed the proceedings without giving opportunity to the second party to lead evidence and as such the principles of natural justice have been violated. Submission of Learned Counsel for the concerned workman is that it is necessary to have reconsideration of Part – I award passed by this tribunal but then the fact remains that the concerned workman in his cross examination has clearly admitted that he has not challenged the Part – I award before the Hon'ble H.C. by filing writ petition. As such there is no question of reconsideration or re-appreciation of the evidence or reconsideration of Part – I award. The question therefore that comes for consideration is whether the punishment of reducing pay scale by two stages and recovery of legal fees and other expenses Rs.12,800/- is shockingly disproportionate.

14. The second party workman was awarded the punishment of reducing his pay scale by two stages in his time scale of pay and recovery in the legal fees and the expenses incurred by the first party. He was charged on the allegations that he has done the changes in policy period by putting remark "please change date & time" on the previous year policy copy when he got to know that new policy bearing No. 2002/3886 is renewed from 10.10.2001 to 9.10.2002. It appears that hand writing expert's opinion was considered as a piece of evidence to confirm his findings by the EO to come to the conclusion that the misconduct of the concerned workman is proved. The punishment is awarded to second party as per rule 23 of General Insurance Rules and he is continued in employment. After the punishment period is over, he was restored again to his time scale. It appears therefore that no major penalty was awarded to him. Even as per the admission of the concerned workman he is in service and his two increments were stopped. After a period of 2 years his regular increments were given to him. Thus it can be said that minor punishment was awarded to him. In view of that it can be said that no prejudice has been caused to him and the punishment awarded was just & proper.

7342 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

15. In view of this, the Learned Counsel for the first party submitted that the Labour Court cannot substitute the penalty imposed by the employer when the labour court found the charges to have been clearly established. In the context reliance is placed on the decision in case of Janatha Bazar South Kanara Central Co-op. Wholesale Stores and Ors. V/s. Secretary, Sahakari Naukarara Sangh & Ors. – 2007 – SCC – 517.

16. The question therefore is whether the punishment imposed upon the concerned workman is shockingly excessive or dis-proportionate to the gravity of proved misconduct. For, it is explicit that the jurisdiction of the Labour court u/s. 11 (a) of I.D. Act is not unlimited. As such section 11 (a) does not confer arbitrary power on the Industrial Court or Labour Court. The jurisdiction is supervisory in nature to be exercised where the finding of disciplinary enquiry is not based on evidence. Where there has been transgression of principles of natural justice and where the finding is perverse in the sense that no reasonable body of the persons would have arrived at such a findings, then jurisdiction u/s. 11 (a) of I.D. Act can be exercised.

17. Considering all these facts and the legal position cited above, I find that punishment imposed upon the concerned workman of reducing pay scale by two stages and recovery of legal fees and other expenses Rs.12,800/- is not shockingly disproportionate. Punishment imposed upon him is adequate to the misconduct. Punishment imposed is minor punishment. It is not causing prejudice to him. Issue No. 3 is therefore answered accordingly as indicated against it.

ISSUE NO. 4 & 5:-

18. In view of my findings to issue No. 3 and Part – I Award, the workman is not entitled to any relief, so the reference is liable to be rejected with no order as to costs. Hence order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.

Date: 12.09.2019

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1876187618761876....————औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार

मेसर्स न्यू इdिडया एश्योरेंस कं पनी लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संब> नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में नि(cid:143)र्दष्ट

औद्योगिक विवाद में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं (cid:127)म न्यायालय, चैन्नई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 29/2018) को

प्रकाशित करती है जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार को 15.10.2019 को प्राप्त 1आ था।

[सं. जेड-16025/4/2019-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के . िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019

S.O. 1876.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 29/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. New India Assurance Co. Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15.10.2019.

[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7343

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

ID No. 29/2018

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M., PRESIDING OFFICER

Date: 28.08.2018

Sri A. Jawaran S/o Aruvaiah Kerban Village Nihunk Post Kotagiri-643217

: 1st Party/Petitioner

AND

The Regional Manager M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Obli Towers, R.S. Puram Coimbatore-02.

: 2nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the 1st Party/Petitioner                :        Advocates, M/s.  S. Saravanan
For the 2nd Party/Respondent                :        Advocate, Sri A. S. Gunasekaran

AWARD

This is an Application under 2A(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act filed by one Mr. A. Jawaran. The Applicant case in brief is that he was employed under the Respondent and joined on 13.05.1985 as a Record Clerk in Micro Office, Kotagiri. On a false charge, the Applicant/Petitioner was dismissed from his service on 26.10.2015. By that time his last drawn salary was Rs. 19,000/- per month. He was a permanent employee and discharging his duties to the full satisfaction of the Respondent. Being aggrieved with the order of dismissal the Applicant raised the dispute before the Conjciliation Officer-The Regional Labour Commissioner. Since the matter could not be resolved, on expiry of 45 days the Applicant challenged the order of dismissal before the Tribunal seeking his reinstatement with full backwages.

2. In view of the facts of discussion held supra, perused the documents on record including the Office Note, it reveals that the Applicant raised the dispute before the Regional Labour Commissioner and after expiry of 45 days approached this Tribunal. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent strenuously raises objection on the point of Admission on Maintainability. On perusal of the Office Note it further reveals that even though after expiry of 45 days after raising the dispute before the Regional Labour Commissioner, the Applicant filed this 2A Application on dated 31.10.2018, was not within the required period of limitation of 3 years from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. on 26.10.2015.

3. In order to bring the instant Application within the ambit of the amended provision under 2A Act, it is to be seen if the Applicant approaches this Forum-The Industrial Tribunal after exhausting all pre requisites of the conditions contemplated under the provision of 2A (2) of the Act Admittedly the amended insertion under 2A of the ID Act is a beneficiary legislation for the workmen, which provides a right in favour of the workmen to approach directly to the appropriate Forum under the Act to get immediate relief.

Section 2A sub clause (2) of the ID Act reads as follows :

"Notwithstanding anything contained is Section 10 any such workmen as is specified in Sub-section (1) may,

make an application direct to the Labour Court or Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute referred to therein

after the expiry of forty-five days from the date he has made the application to the Conciliation Officer of the

appropriate Government for conciliation of the dispute, and in receipt of such application the Labour Court

or Tribunal shall have powers and jurisdiction to adjudication upon the dispute, xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx

Section 2A of sub clause (3) reads as follows

"The application referred to in Sub-section (2) shall be made to the Labour Court or Tribunal before the

expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of service

as specified in Sub-section (1)"

7344 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. In combined reading of both the section it needs to be seen if the Applicant has raised the dispute before the Labour Machinery and after expiry of 45 days approached the Tribunal under 2A within a period of 3 years from the alleged date of termination. It appears the Applicant raised the dispute before the Labour Machinery on expiry of 45 days, approached this Tribunal. Admittedly, the Application under 2A was filed on 31.10.2018 which is necessarily beyond the period of limitation of 3 years from the date of the alleged termination of him from job on 26.10.2015. There was delay of 5 days. On a meticulous perusal and scrutiny on the documents available on record, it is found that not a single scrap of document has been filed by the Applicant assigning any reason to consider the 5 days delay for condonation. No petition is filed to this effect.

5. In view of the discussion held in preceding paragraphs the Application filed by the Applicant deserves no merit for consideration as not maintainable under the provisions under section 2 (2A) of the Industrial Dispute Act.

The instant Application in ID 29 of 2018 stands dismissed.

(Dictated and transcribed by PA and corrected and pronounced in the open court on this day the 28th August, 2019)

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1877187718771877....————औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार

मेसर्स हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम काप|रेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संब> नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में

नि(cid:143)र्दष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं (cid:127)म न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या

36/2005) को प्रकाशित करती है जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार को 14.10.2019 को प्राप्त 1आ था।

[सं. एल-30011/10/2004-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के . िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019

S.O. 1877.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 36/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14.10.2019.

[No. L-30011/10/2004-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT: M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/36 of 2005

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM

CORPORATION LTD.

The Executive Director, HPCL, Mumbai Refinery, B. D. Patil Marg, Mahul, MUMBAI.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7345

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

The Vice President, Hindustan Petroleum Karamchari Union, Petroleum House, 17, Jamshedi Tata Road, Churchgate, MUMBAI – 400 020.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER               :      Mr. L. L. D'souza Representative
FOR THE WORKMEN                :      Mr. Jagdish Kavalekar  Representative

Mumbai, dated the 16th September, 2019

AWARD

1. This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-30011/10/2004 – IR (M) dated 18.05.2004. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :

"Whether the action of the management of HPCL, Mumbai Refinery, Mumbai in reducing the manpower in FR

OM & S Department from 6+1 persons per shift to 5+1 per shift w.e.f. 28.10.2003 and increasing the workload

of Process Technicians by forcing them to write/make entries in the Log Book, etc. and marking as 'absent'

those employees not falling in line with the above stated alleged action of the management, without giving any

notice of change as required under Section 9A of the I.D. Act 1947 and without discussing the matter with the

Union as embodies in Clauses 38 read with Clause 35 of Long Term Settlement dated 18.07.2002, is legal,

proper & justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to and from which date and what other

directions are necessary in the matter."

2. After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices.

3. Read pursis Ex. 35. Concerned union wants to withdraw the reference.

4. First party has no objection for withdrawing the reference.

5. In view of withdrawal of reference, the present reference is disposed of with no order as to costs. Hence Order.

ORDER

In view of withdrawal of reference, the present reference is disposed of with no order as to costs.

Date: 16.09.2019

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1878187818781878....————औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार मेसर्स अरिहन्त मार्बल माईन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संब> नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में नि(cid:143)र्दष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं (cid:127)म न्यायालय, पंचाट {संदर्भ संख्या 07/2009 आई.टी.आर. (सी)} को प्रकाशित करती है जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार को 15.10.2019 को प्राप्त 1आ था।

[सं. एल-29012/93/2008-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के . िहमांशु, अवर सिचव7346 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019

S.O. 1878.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award {Ref. No. 07/2009 I.T.R. (C)} of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Udaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Arihant Marble Mines and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15.10.2019.

[No. L-29012/93/2008-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

vuqca/k

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh && Jh v:.k dqekj nqcs

izdj.k l[a;k 07@2009 I.T.R.(C)

Jh fnus"k eh.kk (dyklqvk)firk Jh "kadj eh.kk fuoklh xkao dkxnj] ek.Mok Qyk] ckscyk] rglhy [kSjokMk] ftyk mn;iqj

---izkFkhZ

fo:)

Jh izksikbZVj@eSustj] vfjgUr ekcZy ekbZUl] elkjks dh vksojh] ftyk mn;iqj

---foi{kh

mifLFkr %&

izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls % Jh jkts'k fla?koh] vf/koDrk foi{kh dh vkSj ls % Jh vkj- ,l- pkSgku] vf/koDrk

%% iapkV %%

fnukad 01 tuojh] 2019

Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je foHkkx dh vf/klwpuk Øekad L-29012/ 93/2008-IR{M} New Delhi fnukad 30-01-2009 ds }kjk fuEukafdr fookn bl U;k;ky; dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izsf"kr fd;k x;k &

''Whether the action of the management of Arihant Marble Mines, in removing Shri Dinesh Meena (Kalasua) w.e.f. 18/7/2006 just and legal? What relief the workmen is entitled to and from which date?''

mDr vk"k; dk izlax izkIr gksus ij U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k ntZ fd;k tkdj lEcfU/kr i{kdkjku dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s x;sA ftl ij izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls fnukad 08-02-2010 dks Dyse fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk foi{kh dh vkSj ls fnukad 01-02-2011 dks tckc is"k fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr Dyse ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd&izkFkhZ dks foi{kh us fnukad 01-04-1996 dks Øsu vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;qDr fd;k x;k tgka izkFkhZ us fnukad 17-07-2006 rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k rFkk bl nkSjku izkFkhZ ls lqcg 7 cts ls lk;a 7 cts rd dk;Z fy;k x;k ysfdu mls dksbZ vksoj VkbZe jkf"k dk Hkqxrku ugha fd;k u fdlh izdkj lkIrkfgd ;k jk'Vªh; vodk"k fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ fnukad 18-07-2006 dks Ákr% 7 cts M~;wVh ij igwapk rks ml le; foi{kh laLFkku ds ekfyd ,oa eSustj us ekSf[kd vkns"k ls vuqfpr :i ls lsok i`Fkd dj fn;kA izkFkhZ dks lsok i`Fkd djus ls iwoZ dksbZ uksfVl ;k uksfVl&is ugha nh] u gh lquokbZ dk dksbZ volj fn;kA izkFkhZ us vius lEiw.kZ fu;kstu dky esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z fnol ij mifLFkr gksdj viuh lsok,a nh gSA bl izdkj lsok i`Fkd fd;k tkuk izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)kUrksa ds foifjr gSA blfy,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7347 fnukad 18-07-2006 dks dh xbZ lsok eqfDr dks vuqfpr ,oa voS/k ?kksf'kr fd;s tkus o leLr ykHk lfgr iqu% lsok esa cgky fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

foi{kh us vius tckc esa izkFkZuk i= ds rF;ksa dks vLohdkj djrs gq, ;g vafdr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ dks foi{kh laLFkku }kjk fnukad 01-04-1996 ;k vU; fdlh Hkh fnukad dks Øsu vkWijsVj ds in in fu;qDr ugha fd;k rFkk u gh izkFkhZ us foi{kh laLFkku esa fnukad 17-06-2006 rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;kA foi{kh laLFkku }kjk izkFkhZ ls dHkh Hkh lqcg 7 cts ls lk;a 7 cts rd dk;Z ugha fy;k x;kA oLrqr% izkFkhZ dHkh Hkh foi{kh laLFkku esa fu;kstu esa gh ugha jgk rks izkFkhZ ls vksojVkbZe dk;Z fy;k tkuk ;k lkIrkfgd ;k jk'Vªh; vodk"k vkfn fn;s tkus dk dksbZ iz"u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA foi{kh laLFkku }kjk izkFkhZ dks fnukad 18-07-2006 dks lsok i`Fkd ugha fd;k x;k D;ksafd izkFkhZ dHkh Hkh foi{kh laLFkku dh lsok esa ugha jgk] bl dkj.k izkFkhZ dks uksfVl ;k eqvkotk vkfn vnk djus dk dksbZ iz"u gh ugha gSA blfy;s izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

izkFkhZ dks lk{; gsrq dbZ volj iznku fd;s x;s] ysfdu izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls dksbZ lk{; is"k ugha gqbZ] blfy;s fnukad 05-12-17 dks lk{; izkFkhZ cUn dh xbZA foi{kh dks Hkh lk{; gsrq volj fn;s x;s] ysfdu foi{kh dh vkSj ls Hkh dksbZ lk{; is"k ugha gqbZ] blfy;s fnukad 04-12-18 dks lk{; foi{kh cUn dh xbZA

mHk; i{kdkjksa dh cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls vius Dyse ds leFkZu esa dksbZ ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; is"k ugha gqbZA

izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls dksbZ ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; is"k u gksus ls ;g lkfcr ugha gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks dc] fdl izdkj o fdl in ij foi{kh laLFkku }kjk fu;qDr fd;k x;k FkkA lk{; ds vHkko esa ;g Hkh lkfcr ugha gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ us foi{kh laLFkku esa fdl fnukad ls fdl fnukad rd dk;Z fd;kA izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls dksbZ lk{; is"k u gksus ls ;g Hkh lkfcr ugha gksrk gS fd foi{kh laLFkku ds fdl deZpkjh@vf/kdkjh us fdl fnukad dks o fdl izdkj ls lsok i`Fkd fd;k x;kA

mDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij foi{kh laLFkku }kjk izkFkhZ fnus"k eh.kk dks fnukad 18-07-2006 dks lsok i`Fkd fd;k tkuk lkfcr ugha gksrk gSA blfy;s izkFkhZ dksbZ jkgr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk izsf'kr izlax fnukad 30@01@2009 dks mRrfjr djrs gq, iapkV bl izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd &

izcU/kd] vfjgUr ekcZy ekbZUl }kjk izkFkhZ fnus"k eh.kk ¼dyklqvk½ dks fnukad 18-07-2006 dks lsok i`Fkd fd;k tkuk lkfcr ugha gSA

vr% izkFkhZ dksbZ jkgr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

iapkV izdk"kukFkZ leqfpr ljdkj dks Hkstk tkosa A

iapkV vkt fnukad 01 tuojh] 2019 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;k A

v:.k dqekj nqcs] U;k;k/kh'k

नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2019

का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1879187918791879....————औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार मेसर्स भारतीय जीवन बीमा िनगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संब> नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में नि(cid:143)र्दष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं (cid:127)म न्यायालय, पंचाट {संदर्भ संख्या 04/2017 आई.टी.आर. (सी)} को प्रकाशित करती है

जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार को 15.10.2019 को प्राप्त 1आ था।

[सं. एल-17012/22/2016-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के . िहमांशु, अवर सिचव7348 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019

S.O. 1879.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award {Ref. No. 04/2017 I.T.R. (C)} of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Udaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Life Insurance Corporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15.10.2019.

[No. L-17012/22/2016-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

vuqca/k

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh && Jh v:.k dqekj nqcs izdj.k l[a;k 04@2017 I.T.R.(C)

Jh Hkxokuyky firk csyth iztkir fuoklh xzke iqukyh] rglhy o ftyk Mwaxjiqj

---izkFkhZ

fo:)

Jh 'kk[kk izcU/kd] Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe] Mwaxjiqj & 314 001

---foi{kh

mifLFkr %&

izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls % Jh jkts'k [kUuk] vf/koDrk foi{kh dh vkSj ls % lqJh chuk ekFkqj] vf/koDrk

%% iapkV %%

fnukad 05 Qjojh] 2019

Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je foHkkx dh vf/klwpuk Øekad L-17012/ 22/2016-IR{M} New Delhi fnukad 06-03-2017 ds }kjk fuEukafdr fookn bl U;k;ky; dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izsf"kr fd;k x;k &

''Whether the action of Management of Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Dungarpur(Raj.) in terminating the service of Shri Bhagwan Lal Prajapat S/o Belji Prajapat, Village Punali, Tehsil and Distt. Dungarpur (Raj.) w.e.f. 01.02.2012 is legal and justified? If no, then to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?''

mDr vk"k; dk izlax izkIr gksus ij U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k ntZ jftLVj fd;k x;k ,oa lEcfU/kr i{kdkjku dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s x;sA ftl ij izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls Dyse o foi{kh dh vkSj ls tckc is"k fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr Dyse ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd&izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr foi{kh ds v/khu prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh ds in ij fnukad 18-11-2010 dks gqbZ Fkh A foi{kh }kjk fnukad 29-10-2010 dks izkFkhZ dk vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij lk{kkRdkj fy;k og 85 fnol gsrq Mwaxjiqj o lkxokMk 'kk[kkvksa ds fy;s fy;k x;k Fkk] ijUrq izkFkhZ ls Mwaxjiqj 'kk[kk esa gh dk;Z djok;k x;k A izkFkhZ dks fnukad 18-11-10 ls 10-02-11 rd iwjk osru 9217@&#i;s o rRi'pkr~ 11-02-11 ls 31-01-12 rd 100@&#i;s] rRi'pkr~ 135@&#i;s izfr fnu dh nj ls Hkqxrku fd;k x;kA foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZ ls 'kk[kk easa<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7349</span> i=kofy;ka fudkyuk&j[kuk] dEI;wVj esa ,UV~zh;k djuk] cSad esa iSlk tek djkuk o vf/kdkfj;ksa dh ty lsok djuk vkfn dk;Z djok;s tkrs Fks A foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZ dh lsok,a ekSf[kd vkns'k ds }kjk fnukad 01-02-2012 dks lekIr dj nh xbZ A izkFkhZ us fnukad 18-11-2010 ls 31-01-2012 rd djhc Ms< o"kZ rd fcuk fdlh :dkoV ds viuh lsok,a nh A foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZ dks izR;sd ekg esas 10 fnu] 7 fnu] 4 fnu] 8 fnu] 5 fnu vkfn fnuksa ds fglkc ls osru ckmpj ds tfj;s Hkqxrku fd;k x;k A foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZ dh gktjh] gktjh jftLVj o eLVjjksy esa yh tkrh Fkh A foi{kh us izkFkhZ dks lsok i`Fkd djus ls iwoZ dksbZ dkj.k ugha crk;k] dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k] dksbZ eqvkotk ugha fn;k vkSj ekSf[kd vkns'k ls izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr dj nh A izkFkhZ us ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd o dsUnzh; dk;kZy; esa 90 fnu o 120 fnu ls vf/kd rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k A bl ckcr izkFkhZ us foi{kh dsk fnukad 18-05-2012 dks ,d uksfVl Hkh fHktok;k] ysfdu foi{kh us mldk dksbZ tckc ugha fn;k A blfy;s fnuakd 01-02-2012 dks dh xbZ lsok lekfIr dks voS/k ?kksf"kr djus o lHkh ykHk iqu% fu;qDr djk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh A</p> <p>foi{kh us vius tckc esa ;g izdV fd;k fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe LVkWQ jsX;wys'ku 1960 ¼la'kksf/kr 1971½ ds jsX;qys'ku 8 ds rgr iw.kZr% vLFkk;h :i ls 85 fnu ds fy;s xbZ Fkh ftlds rgr izkFkhZ dks lsok esa lekfgr fd;s tkus dk dskbZ vf/kdkj mRiUu ugh gksrk gS A dsUnz ljdkj }kjk ikfjr Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 ¼la'kksf/kr 1981½ ds rgr vLFkk;h fu;qfDr ds ekeys esa vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gS A izkFkhZ us ek= 85 fnu fnukad 18-11-2010 ls 10-02-2011 rd dk;Z fd;k Fkk A foi{kh chek dEiuh us ;g Hkh izdV fd;k fd Lo;a izkFkhZ us fnukad 18-11-2010 dks ?kks"k.kk i= ij bl lanHkZ easa gLrk{kj dj foi{kh dsk fn;k Fkk fd & ^^vLFkk;h pijklh in ij dk;Z djus ds i'pkr~ LFkk;h in gsrq okn izLrqr ugha djsxkA** izkFkhZ dks vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij fnukad 18-11-2010 ls 10- 02-2011 rd ds fy;s fu;qfDr nh xbZ Fkh rFkk fnukad 11-02-2011 ds i'pkr~ izkFkhZ dks u rks fu;qfDr i= fn;k x;k] u gh mldh lsok vkxs c<kus dk dksbZ vkns'k fn;k x;k A vkdfLed dk;Z ds fy;s rFkk Miscellaneous Expenses ds isVs tkjh fd;s x;s ckmpjksa ls izkFkhZ ds }kjk foi{kh dk;kZy; esa fd;s x;s fujUrj pijklh ds dk;Z dh iwf"V ugha gksrh gSA izkFkhZ us vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij fu;eksa ds rgr dk;Z fd;k gS] ftlls izkFkhZ dks foi{kh fuxe dh lsok esa LFkk;h fu;qfDr ikus dk vf/kdkj iSnk ugha gq;s gSA fnuakd 10-02-2011 dks izkFkhZ dh vLFkk;h fu;qfDr Lor% lekIr gsk x;h Fkh vr% fnukad 31-01-2012 rd izkFkhZ fuxe ds dk;kZy; esa fu;qDr gh ugha Fkk rks ekSf[kd :i ls fnukad 01-02-2012 dks lsok,a lekIr dj nsus dk dksbZ ekeyk ugha Fkk A izkFkhZ dh dksbZ gktjh] gktjh jftLVj ;k eLVjjksy ij ugha yh xbZ Fkh A fcuk vkns'k ds izkFkhZ }kjk 240 fnu ls vf/kd dke fd;k tkuk laHko ugha gS A vius fo'ks"k dFku esa Hkh ;g vafdr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ ds ekeyk esa /kkjk 25(F)vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gS rFkk Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 ¼la'kksf/kr 1981½ rFkk ps;jesu }kjk tkjh Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe LVkWQ jsX;wys'ku 1960 ¼la'kksf/kr 1971½ ds rgr ps;jesu }kjk tkjh LIC of India Employment of Temporary Staff Instruction 1993 dsUnz ljdkj }kjk cuk;s x;s fu;eksa dk ntkZ j[krs gS rFkk bl ekeys esa vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gS A blfy;s izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gS A</p> <p>izkFkhZ us vius Dyse ds leFkZu esa Lo;a dk 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k ftlls foi{kh vf/koDrk us ftjg dh ,oa foi{kh dh vkSj ls jfo dqekj usxh o es?kjkt dskBkjh ds 'kiFk i= izLrqr gq, ftuls izkFkhZ vf/koDrk us ftjg dh A nksuks i{kksa dh vkSj ls lacaf/kr nLrkost dks iznf'kZr djk;k x;k A</p> <p>mHk; i{kdkjku dh ekSf[kd cgl lquh xbZ A i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;k A</p> <p>cgl ds nkSjku fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us foi{kh Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe ds ;gka vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij 85 fnuksa ds fy;s fu;ekuqlkj lk{kkRdkj nsus ds i'pkr~ 18-11-2010 dks viuk dk;ZHkkj xzg.k fd;k Fkk rFkk fnuakd 10-02-2011 rd 85 fnuksa rd mls iwjk osru 9217@&:i;s HkRrs lfgr iznku fd;k Fkk A mlds i'pkr~ izkFkhZ us foi{kh ds ;gka fnukd 11-02-11 ls 31-01-12 rd 100@&:i;s izfr fnu rFkk mlds i'pkr~ 135@&:i;s izfr fnu dh nj ls etnwjh izkIr dj viuk dke fd;k Fkk A foi{kh ds ;gka izkFkhZ 'kk[kk esa foi{kh ds funsZ'kkuqlkj dk;Z dj jgk Fkk] foi{kh us izkFkhZ dh lsok fnuakd 01-02-2012dks lekIr dj nh] u rks izkFkhZ dks lsok lekIr djus ls iwoZ dksbZ uksfVl fn;k] u gh uksfVl ds ,sot esa eqvkotk fn;k rFkk voS/k rjhds ls mldh lsok lekIr dj nh xbZ A blds i'pkr~ izkFkhZ us dkuwu dk Kku ugha gskus ds dkj.k bl lEcU/k esa ,d f'kdk;r fnukad 13-06-2012 dks izkf/kdkjh] jktLFkku nqdku ,oa okf.kT; laLFkku] Mwaxjiqj ds ;gka izLrqr dh tks fnuakd 11-02-2016 dks {kS=kf/kdkj ds vHkko esa [kkfjt gks xbZ A rRi'pkr~ izkFkhZ us lykg ds vuqlkj dsUnzh; Je foHkkx esa viuk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k] ftl ij bl U;k;ky; esa jsQjsUl l{ke ljdkj }kjk izkIr gqvk A foi{kh us voS/k rjhds ls izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr dh A vr% mls iqu% lsok esa cgky fd;k tkos rFkk mldks fiNyk cdk;k osru] HkRrs] ifjykHk e; ,fj;j o C;kt ds fnyk;k tkos rFkk LFkk;h deZpkjh ekurs gq, lHkh ykHk fnyk;s tkos A fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ us vius rdksZ ds leFkZu esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;s &<span class="header-text">7350 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> (1) 2005 Lab.I.C.Page 3750(Madras) National Small Ind. Vs. The P.O.I Add.Labour Court</p> <p>(2) AIR 2000 (S.c.) Page 3522(1) Kannian and Another Vs. Sethurama</p> <p>(3) 2011 Lab.I.C. Page 2799 (S.C.) Devendra Singh Vs. Municipal Council Sanaur</p> <p>(4) AIR 1993 (S.C.) Page 188 Union of India Vs. Basant Lal</p> <p>(5) 2015 Lab.I.C. Page 2012 (S.C.) Tamil Nadu Terminal Vs. Life Insurance Corp.</p> <p>mijksDr rdksZ dk [k.Mu djrs gq, fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh dk rdZ gS fd bl ekeys esa foi{kh dh vkSj ls izkFkhZ dks Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe ds LIC of India Employment of Temporary Staff Instruction 1993 ds fu;eksa ds rgr vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij 85 fnukas ds fy;s fu;qfDr nh xbZ Fkh rFkk 85 fnu lekIr gksus ij mldh lsok lekIr gks xbZ rFkk mu 85 fnuksa dk mls iw.kZ osru iznku fd;k x;kA lsok esa lekfgr fd;s tkus vFkok fuxe dh lsok esa fujUrj cus jgus dk okn djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha Fkk A fu;qfDr ds foKkiu o fu;qfDr dh 'krksZ esa bu 'krksZ dk mYys[k Fkk rFkk fu;qfDr ds le; izkFkhZ us bl ckr dh vUMjVsafdx nh Fkh fd 85 fnuksa ds ckn mldh lsok lekIr gks tkosxh vkSj mls LFkk;h djus dh ekax djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gksxk A vLFkk;h fu;qfDr dks fuxe }kjk vkxs ugha c<k;k tk;sxk A fnukad 11-02-11 ds i'pkr~ vko';drk gksus ij izkFkhZ us fuxe dh 'kk[kk esa LoPN midj.k ,oa dk;kZy;hu j[k j[kko ds rgr dke fd;k Fkk] ftlds ,sot esa foi{kh }kjk 'kk[kk Lrj ij mls Hkqxrku fd;k x;k tks ckmpjksa ds ek/;e ls fd;k x;k Fkk A mDr dk;Z Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe ds LFkk;h vkns'k ds rgr 'kk[kk Lrj ij djok;k x;k Fkk] ftlds rgr 'kk[kk esa est dqlhZ;ks dh lQkbZ] dkap oxSjk dh lQkbZ bR;kfn dk;Z ds fy;s lqcg 2 ?kaVs dk;Z djk;k Fkk] ftl ckcr mls Hkqxrku dj fn;k x;k Fkk A izkFkhZ us 11-02-2011 ls 01-12-2012 rd u rks pijklh dk dk;Z fd;k vkSj u gh mls foi{kh }kjk dksbZ fu;qfDr i= fn;k x;k A vr% vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugh gksrs gSA izkFkhZ LFkk;h lsok ikus dk o cdk;k osru izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gS A vr% mldk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkos A vius rdksZ ds leFkZu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh dh vkSj ls fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;s x;s &</p> <p>(1) AIR 2006 (S.C.) Page 1806</p> <p>Sec. State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi</p> <p>(2) Supreme Court C.A.No. 4636/2006</p> <p>Regional Manager SBI Vs. Mahatma Mishra</p> <p>Order dated Nov. 01, 2006</p> <p>nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr mijksDr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk vknj iwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;k A bl izdj.k esa nksuksa i{kksa dh vkSj ls izLrqr lk{; ds i'pkr~ esjk foospu o fu"d"kZ fuEu izdkj ls gS &</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls izLrqr A.W.-1 izkFkhZ Hkxokuyky ftlus U;k;ky; esa fn;s x;s vius 'kiFk i= esa vius Dyse izkFkZuk dh iqujkorhZ djrs gq, mUgha rF;ksa dks nksgjk;k gS rFkk bldh lk{; ls ;g izdV gskrk gS fd foi{kh ds ;gka prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh ds in ij bldh fu;qfDr fnukad 18-11-2010 dks gqbZ Fkh rFkk blus 18-11-10 dks dk;ZHkkj xzg.k fd;k Fkk rFkk bldh fu;qfDr vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij 85 fnol ds fy;s gqbZ FkhA bl nkSjku fnukad 18-11-10 ls 10-02-11 rd blus viuk dk;Z lEikfnr fd;k vkSj mls iwjk osru 9217@&:i;s o HkRrs foi{kh dh vksj ls vnk fd;k x;k] vkxs viuh lk{; esa blus ;g izdV fd;k fd fnukad 11-02-11 ls 31-01-2012 rd blus viuh M~;qVh dh Fkh vkSj bl gsrq foi{kh us mls 100@&#i;s o rRi'pkr~ 135@&#i;s izfr fnu dh nj ls Hkqxrku fd;k Fkk rFkk fnuakd 01-02-2012 dks cxSj fdlh f'kdk;r ds] cxSj tkap fd;s] dksbZ uskfVl&NaVuh eqvkotk bR;kfn fn;s cxSj foi{kh us izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr dj nh A nLrkosth lk{; ds :i esa bl xog dh vkSj ls Ex W-1 ls Ex W-78 rd izLrqr fd;s gS A<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7351</span> blds foijhr foi{kh dh vkSj ls lk{; esa jfodqekj usxh vkSj es?kjkt dksBkjh dks izLrqr fd;k x;k gS A jfodqekj usxh vkSj es?kjkt dksBkjh us viuh lk{; esa ;g crk;k gS fd foi{kh laLFkku dh 'kk[kk Mwaxjiqj esa izkFkhZ dks fnuakd 18-11-10 ls 10-02-11 rd 85 fnol ds fy;s vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk A in iw.kZr% vLFkk;h Fkk] 85 fnu lekIr gksrs gh izkFkhZ dh lsok lekIr gks xbZ mlds i'pkr~ u rks izkFkhZ dh lsok vof/k vkxs c<k;h xbZ vkSj u gh mls LFkk;h fd;k x;k] u gh vkxs lsok ds fy;s dksbZ fu;qfDr i= tkjh fd;k x;k A vkxs viuh lk{; esa ;g Hkh crk;k fd 'kk[kk dk;kZy; esa lkQ&lQkbZ ds dk;Z ds fy;s nSfud osru ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djk;k Fkk vkSj mldk Hkqxrku mls ckmpjksa ds ek/;e ls ^^LoPN midj.k ,oa dk;kZy;hu j[k j[kko** en ls fd;k x;k Fkk A mls Hkqxrku rRdkfyu 'kk[kk izcU/kd LofxZ; dkafryky }kjk ckmpjksa ds ek/;e ls fd;k x;k Fkk A nLrkosth lk{; ds :i esa foi{kh dh vkSj l Ex M-1 yxk;r Ex M-3 lk{; esa izLrqr fd;s x;s A</p> <p>bl izdkj nksuksa i{kksa dh vkSj ls tks lk{; vkbZ gS] mlesa ;g Lohd`r :i ls lkeus vk;k gS fd foi{kh }kjk Ex M-2 fnuakd 15-11-2010 ds rgr izkFkhZ dks Mwaxjiqj fLFkr viuh 'kk[kk esa iw.kZ :i ls vLFkk;h rkSj ij vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij 85 fnol dh fu;qfDr gsrq mls fu;qfDr i= tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk A fu;qfDr i= esa bu 'krksZ dk gokyk gS fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr 85 fnol ds fy;s iw.kZ :i ls vLFkk;h in ij vLFkk;h rkSj ij dh tk jgh gS rFkk mls fu;ekuqlkj osru e; nSfud HkRrk ,oa edku fdjk;k HkRrk ns; gksxk rFkk ewy osru 6180@&:i;s ij fu;qDr fd;k rFkk bl fu;qfDr i= esa bl 'krZ dk Hkh mYys[k Fkk fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr fuxe esa fdlh Hkh in ij fu;qfDr ds fy;s fdlh Hkh izdkj dh ofj;rk vFkok fuxe esa ukSdjh gsrq nkok djus dk vf/kdkj ugh gksxk rFkk le;kof/k lekIr gskus ds i'pkr~ fu;qfDr lekIr gks tkosxh A bu 'krksZ ds lEcU/k esa izkFkhZ us Ex M-1 dk;Zxzg.k fjiksVZ foi{kh ds ;gka izLrqr dh A ftlesa mlus bl rF; ckcr ?kks"k.kk iznku dh fd eS vLFkk;h pijklh in ij dk;Z djus ds i'pkr~ LFkk;h in gsrq okn izLrqr ugha d:axk A</p> <p>izkFkhZ dk foi{kh laLFkku esa fnukad 18-11-2010 ls 10-02-2011 rd fd;s x;s dk;Z ds ckcr foi{kh dh vkSj ls izkFkhZ dks fu;qfDr i= fn;k x;k rFkk fuxe ds fu;ekuqlkj osru Hkqxrku iznku fd;k ftlds lEcU/k easa izLrqr Hkqxrku ckmpj Ex W-14 ls Ex W-17 gS A</p> <p>bl izdkj lk{; ls ;g iw.kZ :is.k lkfcr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks foi{kh }kjk vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij tks fu;qfDr 85 fnol ds fy;s iznku dh xbZ Fkh bl rF; dks izkFkhZ iw.kZ :is.k tkurk Fkk rFkk 85 fnu ds ckn mDr fu;qfDr lekIr gks tkuk Hkh izkFkhZ ds Kku esa Fkk vkSj bl ckcr mlus fyf[kr lgefr Hkh nh Fkh fd lsok lekIr gksus ds ckn lsok esa LFkk;h fd;s tkus ckcr dksbZ ekax foi{kh ls ugha djsxk A bl izdkj lk{; ls ;g iw.kZr% lkfcr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks foi{kh laLFkku esa fnukad 18-11-2010 ls 10-02-2011 rd 85 fnol ds fy;s vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij fu;qfDr iznku dh xbZ Fkh A</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh vksj ls viuh lk{; esa ;g Hkh izdV fd;k x;k fd fnukad 11-02-2011 ls 31-01-2012 rd mlus foi{kh laLFkku esa pijklh ds in ij dk;Z fd;k rFkk bl gsrq foi{kh dh vkSj ls mls 100@&:i;s rRi'pkr~ 135@&#i;s nSfud etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij mls Hkqxrku fd;k x;kA Hkqxrku ds lEcU/k esa foi{kh dh vkSj ls tkjh Ex W-18 yxk;r Ex W-76 izLrqr fd;s] ftls izkFkhZ Lohdkj djrk gS A blesa Ex W-18, 19 ds voyksdu ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks fnukad 12-02-11 ls 19-02-11 rd 8 fnol dk;Z djus dk Hkqxrku foi{kh dh vkSj ls tfj;s ckmpj Ex W-18 fd;k x;k rFkk Ex W-20 ls ysdj Ex W-76 ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd bl nkSjku ekg esa 8 fnu] 10 fnu] 12 fnu ds vUnj izkFkhZ }kjk nSfud fd;s x;s dk;Z ds lEcU/k esa foi{kh dh vkSj ls izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k A vfUre Hkqxrku ds lEcU/k esa izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls Ex W-76 Hkqxrku ckmpj izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftlds voyksdu ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks foi{kh dh vkSj ls 19] 20 vkSj 21 tuojh] 2012 dks fd;s x;s dk;Z ds lEcU/k easa fnukad 31-01-2012 dks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k] tcfd izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr Ex W-77 ,oa Ex W-78 cksul ckcr gS</p> <p>bl izdkj ekSf[kd lk{; esa rks izkFkhZ fnukad 31-01-2012 rd foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z fd;k tkuk rFkk fnuakd 01-02-2012 dks mls lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk crkrk gS] ysfdu nLrkosth lk{; tks izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls izLrqr gqbZ gS] mlesa izkFkhZ dk vfUre ckj fnuakd 21-01-2012 rd foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z fd;k tkuk vkSj ml ckcr Hkqxrku izkIr fd;k tkuk izdV gskrk gS tks Ex W-76 ls lkfcr gksrk gS A fnuakd 22-01-2012 ls 31-01-2012 ds e/; izkFkhZ us foi{kh ds ;gka dksbZ dk;Z fd;k gks vkSj foi{kh us mldk Hkqxrku fd;k gks] bl ckcr dksbZ nLrkosth lk{;] Hkqxrku ckcr ckmpj bR;kfn izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls izLrqr ugha fd;s x;s gSA</p> <p>bl lEcU/k esa foi{kh dh vksj ls tks lk{; izLrqr gqbZ gS mlesa Hkh foi{kh ds xokg us vius eq[; ijh{k.k esa o ftjg esa bl rF; dks Lohdkj ugha fd;k fd izkFkhZ us foi{kh ds ;gka 31-01-2012 rd dk;Z fd;k gks A bl lEcU/k esa foi{kh ds xokg es?kjkt dksBkjh us viuh ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ us gekjs foHkkx esa fnuakd 01-02-11 ds i'pkr~ yxkrkj<span class="header-text">7352 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> dke ugha fd;k] chp&chp esa og lQkbZ dk dke djrk Fkk vkSj mls mldk Hkqxrku dj fn;k x;k A vr% izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa ;g lkfcr djus esa iw.kZr% vlQy jgk gS fd mlus foi{kh ds ;gka fnukad 31-01-2012 rd nSfud etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij vLFkk;h pijklh ds :i esa dk;Z fd;k rFkk fnukad 01-02-2012 dks foi{kh us mls ekSf[kd vkns'k ls lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k A</p> <p>bl izdkj bl ekeys esa tks lk{; vkbZ gS mlls izkFkhZ dk foi{kh laLFkku esa pijklh ds in ij dk;Z djus dh izkfLFkfr ds ckcr tks lk{; vkbZ gS mlls ;g lkfcr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ foi{kh laLFkku tks dsUnzh; fuxe ds vUrxZr vkrk gS] mldh vksj ls tkjh LFkk;h vkns'k ds rgr Cirl. No. 2Z/792/ASP/93 fnukad 28 twu] 93 dks ikfjr fd;k x;k] mDr fu;eksa ds rgr Mwaxjiqj 'kk[kk esa vLFkk;h pijklh ds in ij 85 fnol dh fu;qfDr gqbZ A izkFkhZ dks lk{kkRdkj ysus ds i'pkr~ fu;qDr fd;k x;k Fkk A fu;qfDr ds le; izkFkhZ dks bl rF; dk iw.kZr% Kku Fkk fd ftl in ij og fu;qDr gks jgk gS og iw.kZr% vLFkk;h gS rFkk mldh fu;qfDr ek= 85 fnu ds fy;s gS vkSj bl ckcr foi{kh dh vksj ls fu;qfDr vkns'k esa of.kZr osru o HkRrs iznku fd;s x;s A 85 fnu ds i'pkr~ fnukad 10-02-2011 ds i'pkr~ izkFkhZ dh lsok Lor% lekIr gks xbZA rRi'pkr~ bl izdj.k esa 'kk[kk izcU/kd Lo- dkafryky }kjk] ftudh e`R;q gks tkuk lk{; esa izdV fd;k x;k gS] us Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe esa LFkk;h vkns'k ds rgr LoPN midj.k ,oa dk;kZy;hu j[k j[kko ds :i esa nSfud etnwj ds :i esa izkFkhZ ls viuh 'kk[kk esa dk;Z djok;k vkSj bl ckcr izkFkhZ us fnuakd 11-02-2011 ls 21-01-2012 rd nSfud etnwjh ds :i esa dk;Z fd;k A ftl ckcr mls Hkqxrku Lo:i 100@&:i;s o rRi'pkr~ 135@&:i;s izfr fnu dh nj ls Ex W-18 ls Ex W-76 ckmpjksa ls Hkqxrku fd;k x;kA</p> <p>fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr AIR 2006 (S.C.) Page 1806 esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us lafonkdehZ] vkdfLed Jfed] nSfud etnwjh ij fu;qDr Jfed ds lEcU/k esa isjk la[;k 34 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd&</p> <p>Thus, it is clear that adherence to the rule of equality public employment is a basis feature of our Constitution and since the rule of law in the core of our Constitution, a Court would certainly be disabled from passing an order upholding a violation of Article 14 or in ordering the overlooking of the need to comply with requirements of Article 14 read with Article 16 of the Constitution therefore, consistent with the scheme for public employment, this court while laying down the law, has necessarly to hold that unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rule and after a proper competition among qualified person, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. If it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at the end of the contract, if it were an engagement or appointment on daily wages or casual basis the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. Similarly, a temporary employee could not claim to be made permanent on the expiry of his term of appointment. It has also to be clarified that merely because a temporary employee or a casual.</p> <p>vr% mijksDr U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds ifjisz{k esa izkFkhZ gLrxr izdj.k esa foi{kh ds ;gka fd;s x;s dk;Z ds lEcU/k esa viuh lsok dks fu;ferhdj.k djkus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gS A</p> <p>cgl ds nkSjku fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr 2015 Lab. I.C. Page 2012 (S.C.) ds ekeys esa Jfedx.k vLFkk;h :i ls LFkk;h izd`fr ds dk;Z dbZ o"kksZ ls yxkrkj dj jgs Fks] muds lEcU/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk foi{kh }kjk vuqfpr Je O;ogkj fd;s tkus dks lgh Bgjk;k x;k Fkk A tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ LFkk;h izd`fr ds dk;Z ds lanHkZ esa fnuakd 11-02-11 ds i'pkr~ viuh lsok esa ugha jgk Fkk A bl lEcU/k esa izkFkhZ us viuh ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd ^^;g lgh gS fd fnuakd 11-02-11 ls 31-01-12 ds chp 85 fnu ds fy;s vU; O;fDr;ksa ls pijklh dk djok;k x;kA** vFkkZr~ izkFkhZ fnukad 11-02-11 ds i'pkr~ nSfud etnwjh ij 'kk[kk esa lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z dj jgk Fkk rFkk pijklh ds in ij vU; O;fDr fu;qDr FksA</p> <p>vr% fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls izLrqr mijksDr U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds rF; i`Fkd gksus ls gLrxr ekeys easa mUgsa dksbZ enn ugha feyrh gS A</p> <p>gLrxr izdj.k esa l{ke ljdkj }kjk tks jsQjsUl vf/kfu.kZ; gsrq bl U;k;ky; dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS] mlesa fnuakd 01-02-2012 ls izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;s tkus ds lEcU/k esa fookn gS] tcfd lk{; ls ;g iw.kZr% lkfcr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ us foi{kh laLFkku esa tc fnuakd 21-01-2012 ds i'pkr~ dk;Z gh ugha fd;k rks foi{kh }kjk mls fnuakd 01-02-2012 dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gks ;g rF; lkfcr ugha gqvk gSA vr% vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 (F) ds izko/kku izkFkhZ ds ekeys esa ykxq ugha gksrs A<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7353</span> QyLo:i izkFkhZ Hkxokuyky dks foi{kh }kjk fnukad 01-02-2012 dks lsok i`Fkd djuk lkfcr ugha gS A vr% izkFkhZ dksbZ jkgr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gS A</p> <p>vr% Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk izsf"kr izlax fnukad 06@03@2017 dks mRrfjr djrs gqos iapkV bl izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd&</p> <p>^^'kk[kk izcU/kd] Hkkjrh; thou chek] Mwaxjiqj] 'kk[kk Mwaxjiqj ¼jktLFkku½ }kjk izkFkhZ Jh Hkxokuyky iztkir firk csyth iztkir dks fnuakd 01-02-2012 ls lsok ls i`Fkd djuk lkfcr ugha gSA</p> <p>blfy;s izkFkhZ dksbZ jkgr ikus dk gdnkj ugha gSA</p> <p>iapkV izdk"kukFkZ Hkkjr ljdkj dks Hkstk tkosaA</p> <p>iapkV vkt fnukad 05 Qjojh] 2019 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;kA</p> <p>v:.k dqekj nqcs] U;k;k/kh'k</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 15 अक्तूबर, 2019</h4> <p>का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1880188018801880....————औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार मेसर्स हिन्दुस्तान जिंक लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संब> नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में नि(cid:143)र्दष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं (cid:127)म न्यायालय, पंचाट {संदर्भ संख्या 02/2016 आई.टी.आर. (सी)} को प्रकाशित करती है जो के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार को 15.10.2019 को प्राप्त 1आ था ।</p> <p>[सं. जेड-16025/4/2019-आईआर (एम)]</p> <p>डी. के . िहमांशु, अवर सिचव</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 15th October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1880.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award {Ref. No. 02/2016 I.T.R. (C)} of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Udaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Hindustan Zinc Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15.10.2019.</p> <p>[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]</p> <p>D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.</p> <p>vuqca/k</p> <h4>vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½</h4> <h4>ihBklhu vf/kdkjh && Jh v:.k dqekj nwcs</h4> <p>izdj.k l[a;k 02@2016 I.T.R.</p> <p>Jh Nxuyky firk ghjkyky pekj fuoklh DokVZj ua- 48@2] jktiqjk njhck ekbZUl rglhy jsyexjk] ftyk jktleUn</p> <p>---izkFkhZ</p> <p>fo:)</p> <p>1- Jh bZdkbZ iz/kku] jktiqjk njhck [knku] fgUnqLrku ftad fyfeVsM] njhck] ftyk jktleUn</p> <p>2- esllZ fgUnqLrku ftad fyfeVsM] eq[;ky; Lo:i lkxj] mn;iqj tfj;s izcU/k funs'kd] lg v/;{k] fgUnqLrku ftad fy-</p> <p>---foi{khx.k<span class="header-text">7354 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> </p> <h4>izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 2 (A) vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e</h4> <p>mifLFkr %&</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ugha</p> <p>foi{khx.k dh vkSj ls % Jh Hkjr l:ifj;k] vf/koDrk</p> <p>%% iapkV %%</p> <p>fnukad 04 flrEcj] 2019</p> <p>izkFkhZ Nxuyky }kjk viuh lsok eqfDr ckcr loZizFke f'kdk;r izkFkZuk i= mi eq[; Je vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½ vtesj ds ;gka izLrqr fd;k Fkk] ysfdu ogka ij 45 fnu dh lhek esa le>kSrk ugha gks ldk] blfy;s izkFkhZ }kjk ;g Dyse is'k fd;k gSA ftl ij U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k ntZ jftLVj fd;k x;k ,oa foi{kh dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s x;sA</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls izLrqr Dyse ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZ ds firk ghjkyky foi{kh ds v/khu dk;Zjr Fks rFkk mudh e`R;q gksus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks muds LFkku ij etnwj ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k x;kA o"kZ 2003 esa izkFkhZ dks ,d feuh cl us VDdj ekj nh ftlls mldk ck;ak iSj VwV x;k rFkk d`f=e iSj yxkuk iMkA izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr 11-11-1999 dks etnwj ds in ij dh xbZ Fkh rFkk o"kZ 2003 easa nq?kZVukxzLr gks tkus ds ckn fnukad 25-12-2005 ls iz'kklfud foHkkx esa etnwjh&kkk Js.kh izFke in ij fjgsfcys'ku@inLFkkiu fd;k x;k rFkk vkns'k fnukad 27-11-2012 }kjk izkFkhZ dks gsYij Js.kh&kk ds in ij inksUur fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZ dh f}rh; inksUufr gsYij Js.kh&kk ls DydZ de VkbZfiLV Js.kh IV-A ls inksUur dj [knku foHkkx esa LFkkUrfjr fd;k x;k vkSj ,d o"kZ ds fy;s ifjoh{kk dky fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;kA lu~ 2012 esa izkFkhZ eSaxthu ij dk;Z ds nkSjku fl<h;ks ls fxj x;k ftlls iqu% izkFkhZ dk nkfguk iSj {kfrxzLr gks x;k ftldh dksbZ {kfriwfrZ ugha dh xbZ vkSj tkap ds fy;s xqtjkr fjlpZ ,.M esfMdy bULVhV~;qV Hkstk x;k tgka fo'ks"kKksa }kjk izkFkhZ dh tkap ds i'pkr~ 4]50]000@& :i;s iSj yxkus dh vuq'ka"kk dh xbZ] fdUrq foi{khx.k us mls iSj yxkus gsrq ughs Hkstk] tcfd izpfyr fu;eksa ds rgr foi{kh dk ;g nkf;Ro Fkk A fnukad 24-03-2014 dks vpkud foi{khx.k dh vksj ls izkFkhZ dks 'kkjhfjd {kerk dh tkap dk i= nsj fpfdRlky; esa Hkstk x;k tgka MkDVj us ml ij LoSfPNd lsok fuo`fr ysus dk ncko Mkyk vkSj izkFkhZ }kjk vLohdkj fd;s tkus ij o mudh ckr u ekuus ij izkFkhZ dks fcuk tkap fd;s ykSVk fn;k vkSj izkFkhZ ds fo:) pqipki v;ksX;rk dk izfrosnu foi{khx.k dks Hkstk x;kA ftldh tkudkjh izkFkhZ dks ugha nh xbZA izkFkhZ dks fcuk lwpuk uSlfxZd U;k; ds fo:) foi{khx.k }kjk fjiksVZ izkIr dj fnukad 02 viszy 2015 dks izkFkhZ dks ijs'kku djus ds mn~s'; ls fo|qr ¼Hkwfexr½ foHkkx esa LFkkukUrfjr dj fn;k vkSj fnukad 01-04-15 ds vkns'k ls iqu% gsYij&kk ds in ij inkour dj fn;k x;k A izkFkhZ dks vUurksxrok voS/k :i ls fnukad 28 ebZ] 2015 ds vkns'k la[;k 808 }kjk LFkk;h vkns'k dh /kkjk 15¼3½¼A½ ds vUrxZr orZeku foHkkx esa l{ke ugha gksus ls rqjUr izHkko ls lsok i`Fkd dj fn;k A izkFkhZ us ;g Hkh izdV fd;k fd The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of rights & full participation) Act 1995 dh /kkjk 47 ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ dks fu;kstu ls fu;ksZX;rk ds dkj.k ugha gVk;k tk ldrk gS tks mldh lsok 'krksZ dk Hkkx gSA bl dkj.k Hkh izkFkhZ dh lsok lekfIr voS/k gS A izkFkhZ dks lsok i`Fkd fd;k x;k tks NaVuh dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZ dks ,d ekg dh vfxze lwpuk ;k osru ugha fn;k] u mls dksbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k vnk dh xbZ A blfy;s izkFkhZ dks lHkh ykHkks lfgr iquZfu;qfDr djk;s tkus dk vkns'k iznku fd;k tkos A</p> <p>foi{kh us vius tckc esa ;g izdV fd;k fd izkFkhZ viuh ukSdjh dks ysdj xEHkhj ugha jgk gS rFkk le;≤ ij vukf/kd`r rkSj ls vuqifLFkr jgrk jgk gS ftl ij foi{kh }kjk mls dbZ ckj psrkouh Hkh nh xbZA fnukad 13-03-2003 dks izkFkhZ ds lMd nq?kZVuk esa mlds iSj esa pksV vkus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ ds bykt esa gksus okyk lEiw.kZ O;; dEiuh }kjk ogu fd;k x;k rFkk yEcs le; rd vuqifLFkr jgus ds dkj.k dEiuh ds vf/kd`r MkDVj }kjk mldh esfMdy tkap dh rks mlesa ik;k fd og 'kkjhfjd viaxrk gks x;h gS rFkk esfMdy cksMZ us izkFkhZ dks rRdkfyu in ij dke djus gsrq v;ksX; ik;k fQj Hkh ekuoh;rk ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks iz'kklfud foHkkx esa etnwj rhu Js.kh izFke ij fnukad 23-12-2005 ls fjgsfcysV@inLFkkiu fd;k x;k] ijUrq og dk;Z djus esa v;ksX; fl) gqvkA blds ckn fu;kstu esa j[kus ds fy;s izkFkhZ dks ykbZV tkc gsrq fnukad 01-01-2015 ls gsYij Js.kh&2 ls DydZ VkbZfiLV Js.kh&4 esa esxthu DydZ ds in ij inksUur dj ,d o"kZ ijhfo{kk dky esa j[kk x;k ysfdu ijhfo{kk dky esa Hkh mldk O;ogkj o vkpj.k lUrks"kizn ugha ik;s tkus ls dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'kksa ds rgr mls iqu% fjoVZ djus dk izko/kku gSA dEiuh ds vf/kd`r MkDVj dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ dks dEiuh dh lsokvksa ls lsokeqDr fd;s tkus ds vykok vU; dskbZ fodYi 'ks"k ugha FkkA vr% dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'k ds [k.M&15 ds rgr izkFkhZ dks dEiuh dh lsokvks ls lsokeqDr fd;k x;kA esfMdy vufQV dkexkj dks ,yVh,l 9 dh 'krZ vuqlkj eqvkotk jkf'k dk pSd nsus gsrq izkFkhZ dks cqyk;k x;k] ftls izkFkhZ us ysus ls bUdkj dj fn;kA ekuoh; vk/kkjks ij izkFkhZ dks fu;kstu esa cuk;s j[kus dh iwjh dksf'k'k dh mlds ckotwn izkFkhZ dh lsok,a dHkh lUrks"kizn ugha jghA blfy;s izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA</p> <p>izkFkhZ dks lk{; gsrq dbZ volj fn;s x;s] ysfdu izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha gqbZ A foi{kh dh vksj ls Jherh :fg [kku 'kSjokuh dk 'kiFk i= is'k gqvk] ysfdu izkFkhZ dh vuqifLFkfr ds dkj.k ftjg ugha gks ldhA<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7355</span> foi{kh vf/koDrk dh ekSf[kd cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk xgurk iwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA</p> <p>cgl ds nkSjku fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh dk rdZ gS fd bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls viuh lsok ds lEcU/k esa xyr vkjksi ds lkFk Dyse izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k gS] izkFkhZ ftldk lsok ds nkSjku nq?kZVuk esa iwoZ esa vkbZ pksVks ds dkj.k iSj VwV x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr~ Hkh foi{kh laLFkku dh vksj ls mls lsok ls i`Fkd ugh fd;k x;kA rRi'pkr~ izkFkhZ ds iqu% nq?kZVukLr gksus ds QyLo:i pksVs vkus ds dkj.k mls foi{kh dEiuh ds LFkkbZ vkns'kksa dh /kkjk 15¼3½ ds rgr fof/k vuqlkj mldh lsok lekIr dh xbZA tgka rd izkFkhZ }kjk vius izkFkZuk i= esa The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of rights & full participation) Act 1995 dh /kkjk 47 ds izko/kku ds foijhr lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk crk;k gS] tcfd mDr vf/kfu;e bl ekeys esa ykxw ughs gksrk gS] D;ksafd foi{kh laLFkku ,d futh {kS= dk laLFkku gSA blds vykok izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2(OO) ds rgr Lo;a dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk NaVuh ds rgr gksuk crk;k gS] tcfd izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k Fkk] u fd mldh NaVuh dh xbZ Fkh rFkk foi{kh dh vkSj ls izkFkhZ ds lanHkZ esa vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ vius }kjk yxk;s x;s vkjksiks dks fl) djus esa vlQy jgk gS] mldh vkSj ls dksbZ lk{; Hkh is'k ugha dh xbZ gS] tcfd foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr lk{; ls ;g iw.kZ :is.k lkfcr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dh 'kkjhfjd fodykaxrk vkSj foi{kh laLFkku esa dksbZ dk;Z u dj ldus ds QyLo:i fpfdRlh; vk/kkjks ij mls dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'kksa ds rgr lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k FkkA vr% izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr Dyse dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vius Dyse izkFkZuk i= esa foi{kh laLFkku esa vius firk dh e`R;q gksus ds i'pkr~ fnukad 11-11-1999 dks vuqdEik fu;qfDr ds vk/kkj ij etnwj ds in ij fu;qDr gksuk izdV fd;k gS rFkk o"kZ 2003 esa feuh cl ls nq?kZVuk gksus ds QyLo:i izkFkhZ dk nka;k iSj dkVuk iMk ftlls izkFkhZ ds LFkk;h viaxrk vkbZ A rRi'pkr~ Hkh foi{kh ds ;gka lsokjr jguk vkSj foi{kh us mlds dk;Z ls lUrq"V gskdj mls gsYij&ii ds in ls DydZ de VkbZfiLV&4 ds in ij fnukad 01-11-15 ls inksUur dj [knku foHkkx esa LFkkukUrj fd;k tkuk rFkk ,d o"kZ dk ijhfo{kk dky fu/kkZj.k fd;k tkuk izdV fd;kA vkxs vius izkFkZuk i= esa ;g izdV fd;k fd izkFkhZ iqu% fl<h;kas ls fxj x;k ftlds dkj.k iSj esa pksVs vkbZ ftldk bykt vgenkckn fLFkr vLirky esa pyk tgka foi{kh dh vkSj ls Hkstk x;k Fkk tgka iSj yxokus dk [kpZ 4]50]000@&:i;s crk;k x;k gS] ysfdu foi{kh us mDr [kpZ ogu u dj foi{kh us izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k] tks NaVuh dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSA izkFkhZ dh NaVuh fd;s tkus ls iwoZ u rks mls ,d ekg dk vfxze osru fn;k ,oa u gh 16 o"kZ dh lsokvksa ds cnys {kfriwfrZ jkf'k iznku dh xbZA blds vykok foi{kh dh vksj ls The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of rights & full participation) Act 1995 dh vosgyuk djrs gq, mls lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;kA</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls vius Dyse izkFkZuk i= esa fy;s x;s mijksDr rF;ksa dks lkfcr djus ds fy;s dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh xbZA</p> <p>blds foijhr foi{kh us vius tckc esa izkFkhZ dks fnukad 11-11-1999 dks vius laLFkku esa dk;Zjr izkFkhZ ds firk dh e`R;q ds i'pkr~ vuqdEik fu;qfDr ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks etnwj ds in ij fu;qDr gksuk rFkk izkjEHk ls gh izkFkhZ dk vkpj.k vius laLFkku esa lgh ugha gksuk] fcuk lwpuk ds vuqifLFkr jguk rFkk o"kZ 2003 esa gqbZ nq?kZVuk ds QyLo:i LFkk;h fodykaxrk vkuk rFkk rRi'pkr~ Hkh foi{kh dh vksj ls mls lsok esa j[kuk] iqu% izkFkhZ ds pksVs vkus ds QyLo:i foi{kh laLFkku dh vkSj ls izkFkhZ dk fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k djkuk rFkk fpfdRlh; fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dk foi{kh laLFkku esa dksbZ dk;Z djus easa l{ke u gksuk ik;k tkus ij mls dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'kks ds rgr lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk crk;k gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of rights & full participation) Act 1995 ykxw ugha gksuk rFkk izkFkhZ dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2(OO) ds rgr NaVuh ugha fd;k tkuk izdV fd;k gSA</p> <p>mijksDr tckc ds lEcU/k esa foi{kh dh vkSj ls lk{; esa Jherh :fg [kku 'ksjokuh dks izLrqr fd;k gS rFkk nLrkosth lk{; ds :i esa izn'kZ ,e&1 yxk;r izn'kZ ,e&20 dks lk{; esa iznf'kZr djk;k rFkk cgl ds nkSjku foi{kh dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'k dh izfr rFkk foi{kh dEiuh dk futh dEiuh ds :i esa LFkkfir gksus ds lEcU/k esa Wikipidia dh fjiksVZ is'k dh xbZ gSA</p> <p>foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr Jherh :fg [kku dh ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks foi{kh laLFkku esa fnukad 11-11-1999 dks vuqdEik fu;qfDr ds vk/kkj ij etnwj ij in ij fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZ ds lMd nq?kZVuk esa fnukad 13-03-2003 dks xEHkhj pksVs vkus ds dkj.k mldk ?kqVus ds mij rd iSj dkVuk rFkk mlds LFkk;h viaxrk gskuk] rRi'pkr~ Hkh foi{kh laLFkku dh vksj ls izkFkhZ dks vius fu;kstu esa j[kuk rFkk ykbZV tksc gsrq fnukad 01-01- 2015 ls mls gsYij Js.kh&2 ls DydZ VkbZfiLV Js.kh&4 esa inksUur fd;k tkuk crk;k A ysfdu ogka Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk larks"kizn dk;Z u djuk] vuqifLFkr jguk rFkk fn;s x;s dk;ksZ dks djus esa vleFkZ jgus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dh esfMdy tkap ds i'pkr~ foi{kh laLFkku dh vkSj ls esfMdy fjiksVZ izn'kZ ,e&17 o ,e&21 izkIr gksuk o esfMdy cksMZ dh jk; ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ dk foi{kh laLFkku esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dk dk;Z djus esa vleFkZ gksuk izdV fd;k x;k gS] ftlds dkj.k dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'k ds rgr mls foi{kh laLFkku ds vkns'k Øekad jkn@e-iz@@2015@808 fnukad 28 ebZ] 2015 ds }kjk dEiuh ds LFkk;h vkns'k 15¼3½ ds rgr lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk izdV fd;k x;k gSA</p> <p>bl izdkj foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr lk{; ds voyksdu ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dh lsok ds nkSjku esMhdy fjiksVZ izn'kZ ,e&17 o ,e&21 tks esMhdy cksMZ }kjk tkjh dh x;h] ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ dks nq?kZVuk esa vk;h pksV ds nkSjku iSj esa LFkk;h v{kerk ds QyLo:i o"kZ 2003 esa mls ftl ;qfuV esa og dk;Zjr Fkk] ogak dk;Z djus ls vufQV ik;k x;k rRi'pkr~ foi{kh laLFkku }kjk izkFkhZ dks vyx ;qfuV esa gYds dk;Z gsrq LFkkukUrfjr fd;k x;k A tgak ,d lky dh ifjoh{kk ij mls fu;qDr fd;k x;k A ogak Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk dk;Z dk lEiknu u djus ij fnuakd 30-03-2015 dks esMhdy takp esa mls<span class="header-text">7356 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> vUMj xzkmUM dk;Z o fey esa dk;Z djus ds v;ksX; ik;k x;k A QyLo:i izkFkhZ dks foi{kh laLFkku dh vksj ls LFkk;h lsok fu;e 15 ds mifu;e ¼3½ ¼A½ ds rgr lsok ls i`Fkd fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fnuakd 28-05-2015 dks tkjh fd;k vkSj mls lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;kA</p> <p>foi{kh laLFkku ds LFkk;h lsok fu;e ds fu;e 15¼3½¼A½ esa ;g izko/kku gS fd ^^,slh ekufld :X.krk ;k bl izdkj dh 'kkjhfjd viaxrk] ftlds dkj.k o viuk lkekU; useh dk;Z iwjk u dj ldrk gksA** ,sls deZdkj dks ,d ekg dh etnwjh nsdj fu;ksDrk }kjk mldh lsok lekIr dh tk ldrh gS A bl LFkk;h vkns'k ds rgr izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk bl izdj.k esa izekf.kr gksrk gSA</p> <p>izkFkhZ dh foi{kh laLFkku }kjk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2(OO) ds rgr NaVuh ugha dh x;h cfYd vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/fu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 2(OO)(C) ds rgr lsok lekfIr dh xbZ A bl vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2(OO)(C) esa ;g izko/kku gS fd &^^bl vk/kkj ij deZdkj dh lsok dk i;Zolku fd mldk LokLF; cjkcj [kjkc jgk gSA** rks bl vk/kkj ij mls lsok i`Fkd fd;k tk ldrk gS rFkk og NaVuh dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vk;sxkA</p> <p>vr% lk{; ls ;g iw.kZr;k lkfcr gS fd foi{kh laLFkku esa izkFkhZ dks 'kkjhfjd v{kerk ds dkj.k o esMhdy cksMZ }kjk tkjh izn'kZ ,e&17 o ,e&21 ds vk/kkj ij LFkk;h lsok fu;e 15 ds mifu;e ¼3½ ¼A½ ds rgr lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gS] mldh NaVuh ugha dh x;h gSA vr% izkFkhZ dk ;g dFku fd&mls vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds rgr NaVuh dj vf/kfu;eksa ds izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk ugha dh x;h] ekus tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA</p> <p>blds vykok izkFkhZ ds Dyse izkFkZuk i= esa vU; vk/kkj ij dh mls The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of rights & full participation) Act 1995 ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr lsok ls i`Fkd ugha fd;k tk ldrk] bl ekeys esa ;g izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gSaA D;ksafd foi{kh laLFkku ,d futh {kS= dk laLFkku gS] ;g rF; foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr Wikipidia ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd foi{kh laLFkku fgUnqLrku ftad fyehVsM Disinvestment of Public Sector o"kZ 1999 ls 2004 ds e/; ifCyd lsDVj ls futh {kS= esa ifjofrZr fd;k x;kA The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities protection of rights & full participation) Act 1995 dh /kkjk 2(a)(j)(k) ftlesa ,Eyks;j dh ifjHkk"kk nh x;h gS] ds vuqlkj fu;ksDrk ds rgr jkT; o mlds izkf/kdj.k gh vkrs gS A QyLo:i foi{kh laLFkku futh {kS= dk laLFkku gksus ls mijksDr vf/kfu;e foi{kh ij ykxw ugh gksrk A</p> <p>vr% mijksDr fo'ys"k.k ls bl izdj.k esa vk;h lk{; ls iw.kZ:is.k lkfcr gksrk gS fd foi{kh laLFkku }kjk izkFkhZ dks fof/k vuqlkj 'kkjhfjd v{kerk ds vk/kkj ij lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ dksbZ jkgr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gS A</p> <p>mDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij iapkV bl izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd &</p> <p>izkFkhZ Nxuyky firk ghjkyky pekj fuoklh njhck] rglhy jsyexjk ftyk jktleUn dks foi{kh laLFkku fgUnqLrku ftad fyfeVsM }kjk fnukad 28-05-2015 dks fof/k vuqlkj lsok i`Fkd fd;k x;k gS A</p> <p>vr% izkFkhZ Jfed Nxuyky dksbZ jkgr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gS A</p> <p>iapkV izdk"kukFkZ leqfpr ljdkj dks ¼mi eq[; Je vk;qDr ¿dsUnzh;À vtesj ds i= Øekad ,sts&5¼61½@2015 ,,ylh fnukad 26 uoEcj] 2015 ds Øe esa½ Hkstk tkosa A</p> <p>iapkV vkt fnukad 04 flrEcj] 2019 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;k A</p> <p>v:.k dqekj nqcs] U;k;k/kh'k</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 17 अक्तूबर, 2019</h4> <p>का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1881188118811881....————राष्ट्रपित, (cid:127)ी शैलेन्(cid:15) कु मार ठाकु र, पीठासीन अिधकारी, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योिगक अिधकरण सह</p> <p>(cid:127)म न्यायालय सं. 2, धनबाद को दिनांक 26.08.2019 से छ: माह तक की अवधि अथवा नियमित पदाधिकारी के पदभार</p> <p>(cid:139)हण करने तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योिगक अधिकरण सह (cid:127)म न्यायालय, कानपुर के पीठासीन</p> <p>अिधकारी के पद का अतिरिक्त प्रभार सौपते है ।</p> <p>[सं. अ-11016/02/2019-सीएलएस-II]</p> <p>सतीश चन्दर, अवर सिचव<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7357</span> </p> <h4>New Delhi, the 17th October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1881.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kanpur to Shri Shailendra Kumar Thakur, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad for a period of six months with effect from 26.08.2019 or till joining of a regular incumbent or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.</p> <p>[No. A-11016/02/2019-CLS-II]</p> <p>SATISH CHANDER, Under Secy.</p> <h4>नई दिल्ली, 17 अक्तूबर, 2019</h4> <p>का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 1882188218821882....————राष्ट्रपित, (cid:127)ी पुण(cid:145)न्दु कु मार (cid:127)ीवास्तव, पीठासीन अिधकारी, के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योिगक अधिकरण सह (cid:127)म न्यायालय, जबलपुर को दिनांक 05.09.2019 से छ: माह तक की अवधि अथवा नियमित पदाधिकारी के पदभार (cid:139)हण करने तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक के न्(cid:15)ीय सरकार औद्योिगक अधिकरण सह (cid:127)म न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद का अतिरिक्त प्रभार सौपते है ।</p> <p>[सं. अ-11016/02/2019-सीएलएस-II]</p> <p>सतीश चन्दर, अवर सिचव</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 17th October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1882.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Lucknow to Shri Purnendu Kumar Srivastava, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur for a period of six months with effect from 05.09.2019 or till joining of a regular incumbent or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.</p> <p>[No. A-11016/02/2019-CLS-II]</p> <p>SATISH CHANDER, Under Secy.</p> <h4>ubZ fnYyh] 21 vDrwcj] 2019</h4> <p>dk-vk- 1883....————vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj loZ gfj;k.kk xzkeh.k cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua- 2 paMhx<+ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 75@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-10-2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA</p> <p>[la- ,y&12012@68@2014&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1)]</p> <p>ch- ,l- fc'V] voj lfpo</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1883.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 75/2014) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. - II, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Serve Haryana Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.10.2019.</p> <p>[No. L-12012/68/2014– IR(B-1)]</p> <p>B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.</p> <span class="header-text">7358 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH</h4> <p>Present: Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>ID No. 75/2014</h4> <h4>Registered On:-02.02.2015</h4> <p>Sh. Amit Kumar, C/o Sh. Rajinder Pathak, Chamber No.169-C, Lawyers Chambers, District Court, Gurgaon (HR). …Workman</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>1. The Sr. Manager, Serve Haryana Gramin Bank, Branch Tikri City, Gurgaon (Haryana).</p> <p>2. The Chairman, Serve Haryana Gramin Bank, H.O.-Near Bajrang Bhawan, Delhi Road, Rohtak (HR)-124001.</p> <p>3. The Nodal/Regional Officer, Serve Haryana Gramin Bank,</p> <p>Pargati Bhawan, Sector-44, Gurgaon (HR).</p> <p>...Respondents/Management</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>Passed on:-03.09.2019</h4> <p>Central Government vide Notification No. L-12012/68/2014-IR(B-I) Dated 11.12.2014, under clause (d) of sub- section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:—</p> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Serve Haryana Gramin Bank (formerly known as Gurgaon</h4> <h4>Gramin Bank), Gurgaon in terminating the services of Sh. Amit Kumar S/o Shri Kiroudimal w.e.f.</h4> <h4>05.12.2013 is valid, just and legal? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from</h4> <h4>which date?"</h4> <p>1. Both the parties were served with notices. The workman appeared through his counsel Sh. Arun Batra. An opportunity is given to the workman for submission of the claim statement but, in spite of the several opportunities, claimant did not file any claim petition. During the pendency of the proceeding before this Tribunal, workman did not turn up for setting aside the ex parte order dated 03.09.2015, compelling the learned counsel of the claimant Sh. Arun Batra for permission to withdraw from the case and informed that workman is not in touch with him as such, he is unable to submit claim statement in the case. Learned counsel further requested that he may be permitted to withdraw from the present case and requested that appropriate order be passed.</p> <p>2. In view of the above facts and statement made by the learned counsel of the workman, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a 'No Dispute/Claim Award'. Since there is no adjudication of claim petition or case on merits as such, it would not preclude the workman from seeking fresh reference in accordance with Law.</p> <p>3. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.</p> <p>A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>ubZ fnYyh] 21 vDrwcj] 2019</h4> <p>dk-vk- 1884....————vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj mÙkj jsyos izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua- II, ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 102@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21- 10-2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA</p> <p>[la- ,y&41012@11@2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1]</p> <p>ch- ,l- fc'V] voj lfpo<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7359</span> </p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1884.—.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 102/2013) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.10.2019.</p> <p>[No. L-41012/11/2013– IR(B-1)]</p> <p>B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI</h4> <p>Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi.</p> <h4>INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 102/2013</h4> <h4>Date of Passing Award- 25th July, 2019</h4> <h4>Between:</h4> <p>Shri Rajender Kumar Yadav, S/o Late Shri Hukum Singh, Vill. & PO Manjhol, Jabardastpur Distt. Saharanpur (UP).</p> <p>…Workman</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>1. Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Ambala Division, Ambala.</p> <p>2. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Ambala Division, Ambala.</p> <p>…Managements</p> <h4>Appearances:-</h4> <p>Claimant in person, (A/R) For the Workman</p> <p>Shri Manmohan Singh, (A/R For the Management</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <p>The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing between employer i.e. the management of Northern Railway, and its workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L- 41012/11/2013 (IR(B-I) dated 03.06.13 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.</p> <p>"Whether the action of the Northern Railway, Ambala Division in not making payment of wages and other dues and consequential benefits for the intervening period from the removal of service to the date of resumption is unjustified? If so, to what relief workman is entitled to?"</p> <p>As per the claim statement filed by the workman he started working for the management on 10th October, 1978 as a cleaner and got promotion to the post of fire man in the year 1980 which was a Grade-C post. Again in the year 1986 he was promoted to Grade-B and posted as Parcel Clerk/Commercial Clerk. In the year 1989 he was transferred to JUD as Parcel Clerk and again in 1992 to Delhi and posted in the Cash witness office. Again in the same year i.e 1992 he was retransferred to JUD. During this period he received the salary only till the month of January 1993 except the salary for April 1992. During this period he was not paid the bonus for 1986-1987 nor his salary for April 1992, TA, overtime allowance, etc. were paid to him despite repeated demands made in writing. Ultimately after a domestic inquiry he was removed from service on 17.02.1993. He preferred an appeal to the departmental appellate authority who on consideration set aside the order passed in the domestic inquiry and found the order of removal from service illegal. As a consequence thereof though the claimant was reinstated in service w.e.f. 16.08.1993, his monthly salary for the<span class="header-text">7360 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> intervening period coming to a total of Rs. 24000/- approximately was not paid to him alongwith the other dues. The written complaint and all efforts made by the workman turned out futile, and ultimately, the claimant retired from service. He then raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner where a conciliation proceeding was taken up. But for the adamant attitude of the management no effective result came out and the Appropriate Government referred the matter for adjudication as per the terms of the reference. The claimant in his claim petition has prayed that the management be directed to pay him 6 months' salary for the period between 07.02.1993 to 16.08.1993 alongwith interest @ 24% per annum and other consequential reliefs.</p> <p>Being noticed the management filed WS challenging the maintainability of the proceeding. It is the stand taken by the management that the Indian Railways being a central government undertaking the dispute is maintainable before the Central Administrative Tribunal for the procedure laid u/s 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act 1985. It is also contended by the management that the workman before filing the claim application had not obtained a certificate from the appropriate accounts department of railway regarding his entitlement though he has complained about nonpayment of the dues. The other stand taken by the management is that the workman retired from service w.e.f 31.01.2011 and all his retiral benefits have been finalized and settled. At that time for preparation of pension paper no dues certificate was obtained from different internal departments of the management and at no point of time the workman had raised objection citing nonpayment of some dues. The claim which is in the nature of a money claim is time barred. It has also been pleaded by the management that the claim advanced by the workman are matters of record and no record relating to the same is available since as per the circular of the department the relevant records are required to be preserved for a period of 5 years only. But the claim has been filed after a gap of 20 years from the due date. To support the stand management has filed the copies of the pension papers of the claimant including a no dues certificate attached with the same and the department manual and office memorandum relating to preservation time of office records.</p> <p>On this rival pleading the following issues were framed for adjudication.</p> <h4>ISSUES</h4> <p>1. Whether the action of the Northern Railways, Ambala Division in not making payment of wages and consequential benefits for the intervening period from the removal of service to the date of resumption is unjustified? If so its effect?</p> <p>2. To what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?</p> <p>During the proceeding the workman testified as WW1 and proved the documents which were proved in a series of WW1/1 to WW1/12. These are all photocopies of the representations made on different dates to the authorities and hand written personal copies of the claim submitted to the authorities of the management requesting release of his unpaid salary and other dues. Before filing these documents the workman had filed an application u/s 11(3) of the ID Act requesting production of the original documents like his departmental proceeding record, transfers orders, etc. But the management by filling a written reply dated 28.07.2015 denied possession of said documents explaining that the retention period for such documents is 5 years only unless there is specific information relating to a pending litigation.</p> <p>The management examined one of its Commercial Manager as MW1 who testified to say that, the claim advanced by the workman is baseless and not tenable as the same are not based upon records. On behalf of the management several documents were exhibited in a series of MW1/A to MW1/D. These documents include the internal circular of the management indicating the period of preservation of different categories of the documents the copy of the pension paper of the workman including the no dues/ clearance certificate issued by the different internal departments of the management.</p> <p>At the outset of the argument the Ld. A/R representing the workman submitted that the management has intentionally withheld the relevant documents and the plea taken about the destruction of the documents is not correct. It has also been argued that heavy burden is always on the management to prove or disprove the facts alleged by the claimant as based on record as the custodian of the records. In this case the management has alleged about the removal of the workman from the service on 17.02.1993 and reinstatement on 16.08.1993. Whether or not salary was paid to the workman during that intervening period is a matter of record but the management has not taken any step for producing those records for verification of the tribunal.</p> <p>At the cost of repetition be it stated here the workman had called for the documents by filing an application u/s 11(3) and the management did not produce the same on the plea that the documents have been destroyed after the prescribed period of preservation. It is true that the manual or circular filed by the management shows that the records of the unpaid wages are to be preserved for the period of 6 years. But that shall not come to the rescue of the management since the workman is not claiming about his unpaid wages during the working period but for the intervening period between termination from service and reinstatement to service. In a government department or government undertaking for individual employee a service record called service book is maintained which contains the entries in details including salary rise, salary withheld punishment inflicted for departmental proceeding and the consequence of the same etc. The<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7361</span> service book of the employee is a permanent document preserved in the department. In this case the management could have produced the service record to disprove the demand of the workman to say that after his reinstatement all his dues were cleared. The no dues certificate attached to the pension paper or obtained during the preparation of the pension paper normally reflects the dues cleared by the employee and not by the employer.</p> <p>In the case of Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar vs. Md. Latif and others reported in AIR 1968 SC 1413 it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the party in possession of the best evidence which could have thrown light on the dispute is bound to produce the same and the said party cannot rely upon the abstract doctrine of "onus of proof." In this case the management being the employer had acted without diligence in producing the documents for proper adjudication of the matter. In such a situation this tribunal has no hesitation in accepting the oral statement of the workman that he was not paid the salary @ Rs. 4000/- per month from the intervening period 17.02.1993 to 16.08.1993 on account of his removal and reinstatement in service. This oral evidence of the workman finds support and corroboration from the documents filed by the workman making repeated representations and request to the authorities of the management and these documents relate to a period when there was no litigation or dispute pending between the parties. It is also made clear that during the relevant time since the transaction through bank account was not in practice it is not possible on the part of the workman to produce any document to prove his stand with regard to nonpayment of salary for the intervening period i.e. from 17/02/93 to 16/08/93.</p> <p>Hence, it is concluded that the management is liable to pay the salary to the workman between the period 17.02.1993 to 16.08.1993 @ Rs. 4000/- per month alongwith the DA admissible during the said relevant period. Since the workman was left deprived of his legitimate dues it is held that the management shall pay simple interest @ 6% per annum on the said accrued amount from the date when it became due and till the final payment is made. The workman is held not entitled to any other relief as claimed. Hence, ordered.</p> <h4>ORDER</h4> <p>The reference be and the same is answered in favour of the workman on contest. The management is directed to pay the arrear salary of the workman for the period 17.02.1993 to 16.08.1993 @ Rs. 4000/- per month alongwith the DA admissible during the said relevant period. It is also directed that the management shall pay simple interest @ 6% per annum on the said accrued amount to the workman from the date when it became due and till the final payment is made. It is also directed that the management shall make the payment within 3 months from the date when the award would become enforceable failing which the above said amount shall carry interest @ 12% per annum from the date when it was due and till the final payment is made. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.</p> <p>The reference is accordingly answered.</p> <p>Dictated & Corrected by me.</p> <p>25th July, 2019</p> <p>PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer.</p> <h4>ubZ fnYyh] 21 vDrwcj] 2019</h4> <p>dk-vk- 1885....————vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua- 2 paMhx< ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 36@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA</p> <p>[la- ,y&12025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1)]</p> <p>ch- ,l- fc'V] voj lfpo</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1885.—.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 36/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.-II, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.10.2019.</p> <p>[No. L-12025/01/2019– IR(B-1)]</p> <p>B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.</p> <span class="header-text">7362 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH</h4> <p>Present: Sh. A. K. Singh, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>ID No. 36/2014</h4> <h4>Registered on:-03.12.2014</h4> <p>Sh. Naresh Kumar S/o Sh. Chuni Lal R/o V.P.O. Mahuwala, Tehsil & District Fatehabad, Haryana.</p> <p>…Workman</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>1. State Bank of India, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Corporate Centre, Madame Cama Road, Mumbai-400021.</p> <p>2. Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Village Bhattu Kalan,</p> <p>District Fatehabad, Haryana.</p> <p>…Respondents/Management</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>Passed on:-03.09.2019</h4> <p>1. The workman has directly filed this claim petition under Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, with the averment that he was appointed as Sweeper on 02.05.2002 by respondent no.2 in the State Bank of India, Bhattu District, Fatehabad at the salary of Rs.1,500/- per month and he was performed his duties quite honestly and diligently till his termination. The services of the workman were terminated on 13.11.2009 without giving any show cause notice or retrenchment compensation or enquiry and personal hearing. Thus, the termination of the workman is illegal, arbitrary, mala fide and against the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The juniors to the workman retained in service and Pardeep son of Umed Bagri had been appointed in place of the workman. The workman has completed 240 days of service during the previous calendar year and performed his duties from 7.00 am to 4.00 pm. The defendant- management assured the workman for his reinstatement but later refused to reinstate, adopting unfair labour practice as his name was changed from the original name Anil Kumar son of Chunni Lal and Rajpal son of Chunni Lal in their record. Workman raised a demand notice dated 22.12.2009 before the learned Assistant Labour Commissioner but proceedings of conciliation ultimately failed and ALC submitted failure of conciliation proceeding. But appropriate concerned authority did not refer the demand of workman to appropriate labour court observing that "Part time workers have no right for regularization. The dispute has no merit and is not maintainable." The workman filed a Civil Writ Petition No.16317 before the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court against the order of the appropriate-authority which was allowed to be withdrawn with the observation that counsel of the claimant does not press the writ petition in view of the amendment which has to be made in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is therefore prayed that order of termination dated 13.11.2009 be set aside and the workman be reinstated in service with full back wages and other consequential benefits along with 18% interest.</p> <p>2. Defendants/management have filed its written statement, alleging therein that the Government/Ministry of Labour did not made the demand of the workman to the labour court as is alleged by the claimant himself. The workman has no right to file the reference before this Tribunal in view of Section 2-A(2) as well as Section 2-A of the ID Act hence, reference be dismissed on this ground. The workman was never employed by the respondent-bank on regular, temporary or ad hoc basis and no appointment letter was ever issued to the workman. The workman does not fall within the definition of workman under Industrial Disputes Act as he has not completed requisite 240 days of service continuously. The claim is not maintainable as there is no existed a relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and answering respondent. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in so many cases mentioned in Paragraph 5 of the written statement that if unauthorized appointment has been made without any sanctioned post from the concerned- authority and was a back door entry, in such circumstances, Section 25-F of the Act is not applicable. In fact, the workman was engaged as part time on daily wage basis @ Rs.50/- per day. No fixed remuneration was paid to the workman. After sweeping of the branch, he was free to go elsewhere and was not under the control and supervision of the Branch Manager. The service of the said workman was discontinued when a permanent Sweeper was posted at Bhattu Kalan Branch. There is no relation of seniority and juniority between the workman and Sh. Pradeep Kumar. It is therefore, prayed that in view of the submission made above, the workman is not entitled for reinstatement as is prayed.</p> <p>3. Both the parties were given opportunities to file their evidence. Workman Naresh Kumar has filed his affidavit Ex.A-1 along with Annexure W1 to W6. He has accepted that he was kept as Sweeper by the Manager without any advertisement. He has accepted that neither any appointment letter was issued to him nor interview was conducted. This witness has accepted that he was kept as daily wager and was paid for the days he worked through voucher. He has<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7363</span> denied the suggestion of the management-counsel that he did not completed 240 days in a preceding year prior to the termination of his services.</p> <p>4. Management has examined Sh. Samundra Gupta Maurya, Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Bhattu Kalan, Distt. Fatehabad, who has filed his affidavit Ex.MW1 and stated on oath that he was not posted in the year 2002 at Bhattu Kalan Branch of the Bank. He has admitted that he is not in a position to tell whether the attendance register of the year 2002 pertaining to the workman is with the management or not. He has also stated that claimant was paid through voucher regarding petrol, diesel and other miscellaneous expenditure along with stationary till the appointment of Pradeep Kumar, regular employee of the bank. he has accepted that the work of Sweeping is done through outsourcing agency at present.</p> <p>5. I have heard Sh. Arun Batra, Ld. Counsel for the workman and Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the management and perused the file carefully.</p> <p>6. At the very outset, it can be observed that management has taken legal issue regarding the maintainability of the claim petition by virtue of its time barred in the light of the provisions contained in Section 2-A sub-Clause 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This specific plea has been taken by the management in Para 2 of the written statement as such, it is the legal obligation of the Tribunal to discuss the issue at first. On the basis of the plea, raised by the respondent-management, I am of the view that following points would arise for consideration:—</p> <h4>(i) "Whether Labour Court can entertain a claim petition filed under Section 2-A(2) of Industrial</h4> <h4>Disputes Act, 1947 after five years from the date of dismissal/retrenchment of service otherwise</h4> <h4>terminated?</h4> <h4>(ii) Whether Labour Court has right to condone the delay in filing claim statement though sub-Section</h4> <h4>(3) of Section 2-A barred such claim?"</h4> <h4>(iii) Whether the claimant is entitled for relief as claimed in the claim petition?</h4> <p>7. So far as issue no.1 is concerned. Section 2-A of the I.D. Act enables the individual workman to raise a dispute connected with or arising out of his discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of his services by his employer and by legal fiction it would constitute "Industrial Dispute". No other type of dispute regarding an individual workman is contemplated by Section 2-A. After the enactment of Section 2-A, it is not necessary that a dispute relating to the discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of service of a workman must be sponsored by a trade union or a substantial number of workman. In other words, even if it is not sponsored by a trade union or a substantial number of workman, such a dispute will be deemed to be an industrial dispute. Section 2-A of the ID Act reads as under:</p> <h4>"2-A. Dismissal, etc., of an individual workman to be deemed to be an industrial dispute—</h4> <h4>(1) Where any employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the services of an</h4> <h4>individual workman, any dispute or difference between that workman and his employer connected</h4> <h4>with, or arising out of such discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination shall be deemed to be</h4> <h4>an industrial dispute notwithstanding that no other workman nor any union of workmen is a party</h4> <h4>to the dispute.</h4> <h4>(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 10, any such workman as is specified in sub-</h4> <h4>Section(1) may, make an application direct to the Labour Court or Tribunal for adjudication of the</h4> <h4>dispute referred to therein after the expiry of forty-five days from the date he has made the</h4> <h4>application to the Conciliation Officer of the appropriate Government for conciliation of the dispute,</h4> <h4>and in receipt of such application the Labour Court or Tribunal shall have powers and jurisdiction</h4> <h4>to adjudicate upon the dispute, as if it were a dispute referred to it by the appropriate Government in</h4> <h4>accordance with the provisions of this Act and all the provisions of this Act shall apply in relation to</h4> <h4>such adjudication as they apply in relation to an industrial dispute referred to it by the appropriate</h4> <h4>Government.</h4> <h4>(3) The application referred to in sub-Section(2) shall be made to the Labour Court or Tribunal before</h4> <h4>the expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise</h4> <h4>termination of service as specified in sub-Section(1)."</h4> <p>A bare reading of above provision would indicate that a dispute covered under sub-Section(1) can be agitated or questioned by a workman by making an application directly to the Labour Court or Tribunal for adjudication of such dispute and such application should be filed before the expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of service. In other words, the right conferred under Section 2A would lapse immediately preceding the date of expiry of three years of the date of dismissal, discharge etc. Sub-Section (3) of Section 2A would operate independently. The right available to the workman under Section 2A is not withstanding anything<span class="header-text">7364 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> contained in Section 10 of the ID Act. Hence, it is observed that this Tribunal has got no power to entertain claim petition filed beyond limitation as is employed in the above provisions.</p> <h4>ISSUE NO. 2:</h4> <p>8. The second question arises for consideration is whether the dispute raised after five years from the date of dismissal can be entertained by the Labour Court or Tribunal condoning the delay, if any, in raising the dispute? Learned counsel of the workman has contended that limitation should be counted from the date of the order of the Hon'ble High Court dated 11.09.2014 which is objected by the learned counsel of the management by stating the fact that there is nothing in the order of the Hon'ble High Court which permit the Tribunal to count the limitation period from 11.09.2014 as is asserted by the workman counsel. The order of the Hon'ble High Court dated 11.09.2014 runs as follows:—</p> <h4>"Counsel for the petitioner does not press the writ petition in view of the amendment, which has been made</h4> <h4>in Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and prays for withdrawal of the same with liberty to</h4> <h4>approach the Court of competent jurisdiction."</h4> <p>9. It is pertinent to mention that writ petition filed before the Hon'ble High Court has been withdrawn. In view of the amendment which has been made under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Thus, it is crystal clear that claimant has to file the claim petition in view of amended Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Keeping the principles in mind, a reading of Section 2-A(2) would lead to an irresistible conclusion that time stipulated for invoking the jurisdiction of the Labour Court or the Tribunal as the case may be, has to be necessarily "before the expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of service as specified in sub-Section (1). "Time limit for making an application to the Labour Court stipulated in sub-Section (3) of Section 2A does not appear to have a bearing to the provisions of sub-Section (2) of Section 2A. In any event right conferred under Section 2A would lapse immediately preceding the date of expiry of three years from the date of dismissal, discharge etc.,. In other words, the limitation of three years prescribed under sub-Section (3) of Section 2A being mandatory, same cannot be condoned by taking recourse to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which has no application to the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.</p> <h4>ISSUE No. 3:—</h4> <p>10. This issue relates with the relief claimed by the workman for reinstatement with continuity of service and other benefits available therein. Undoubtedly, learned counsel of the management has raised a contention that claimant is not a workman as defined under Section 2(S) of the Act and respondent does not come within the purview of "Industry". But both the arguments have no force in the light of the observation made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532 and Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa 1978(36) FLR 266. Thus, I am of the considered opinion that there exist relationship of employer and employee between the workman and management and management is duty bound to terminate the services of the workman as per provisions envisaged under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.</p> <p>11. The question relates to be same whether there is sufficient evidence to hold that workman was regularly appointed by respondent no.2 on monthly salary of Rs.1,500/- and worked 240 days on each year upto his illegal termination as alleged in the claim petition. Workman/claimant Naresh Kumar has himself admitted in his cross- examination that he was appointed as daily wager and was paid for the days he worked through vouchers. Thus, it is clear that he was not appointed on monthly basis as is alleged by him in his claim petition and was paid for the days he was employed by the management as such.</p> <p>12. Though, workman has alleged in his claim petition as well as in his affidavit that he worked 240 days in each year, prior to the termination of his services by the respondent-bank but he has filed the documents along with affidavit photocopy of bill regarding purchasing of diesel, pen, electronic items, surf, phenyl etc. for which he was paid by the respondent-management but he has not filed any documents to prove that he was serving with the management from 02.05.2002 to 13.11.2009 as is alleged in his claim petition. It is pertinent to mention that he has not made any request before the Tribunal to summon any document pertaining to his attendance or monthly payments in lieu of his services rendered to the management. Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment The Superintending Engineer TWAD Board & Another Vs. M. Natesan, etc.[Civil Appeal Nos.4875-4884 of 2019 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.21962-21971 of 2018], has reiterated again that initial burden lies on the workman to prove that he worked 240 days preceding year of his termination but no effort is made by the workman to prove this crucial aspect of the case which require notice or one month salary, in lieu of notice under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. Thus, having gone through the above critical analysis and evidence, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that claim made by the workman through this is not maintainable as it is time barred as well as without any evidence regarding his illegal termination by the management. Resultantly, claim petition is liable to be dismissed and answered accordingly.</p> <p>13. In view of the aforestated discussion, I am of the considered view that Issue No.1 and 2 has to be answered in the negative namely, Labour Court cannot entertain a claim petition filed under Section 2A(2) of the I.D. Act after five<span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7365</span> years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination and this Tribunal has no right to condone the delay more than five years in filing the claim petition. Even otherwise there is no explanation forthcoming for the delay in not raising the dispute from 13.11.2009 to 21.07.2010 from the date of termination till the date of filing of application before the Assistant Labour Commissioner. The contention of the workman that if there is any delay regarding the filing of claim petition it is due to the conduct of management on pretext of false promise for payment and reinstatement has no force in the eye of law.</p> <p>14. Having gone through the factual and legal proposition, I am of the view that claim petition is time barred as such, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the present claim petition and passed the order on merit without jurisdiction as such, the claimant is not entitled for any relief and the claim petition is liable to be dismissed.</p> <p>15. The reference is answered accordingly. Let copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.</p> <p>A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>ubZ fnYyh] 21 vDrwcj] 2019</h4> <p>dk-vk- 1886....————vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad vkQW ifV;kyk ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua- 2 paMhx<+ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 178@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA</p> <p>[la- ,y&12011@59@2010&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1)]</p> <p>ch- ,l- fc'V] voj lfpo</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1886.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 178/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. - II, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Patiala and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.10.2019.</p> <p>[No. L-12011/59/2010– IR(B-1)]</p> <p>B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH</h4> <p>Present: Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>ID No.178/2011</h4> <h4>Registered on:-08.06.2011</h4> <p>Sh. Paramjit Singh S/o Late Sh. Bhag Singh, presently working as Single Window Operator, State Bank of Patiala, Kurali.</p> <p>…Workman</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>State Bank of Patiala through Deputy General Manager, SCO No.99-101, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh. …Management</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>Passed on:-04.09.2019</h4> <p>Central Government vide Notification No. L-12011/59/2010-IR(B-I) Dated 25.05.2011, under clause (d) of sub- section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:—</p> <span class="header-text">7366 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Patiala in imposing the penalty of reduction of</h4> <h4>basic pay by one stage on Shri Pramjit Singh Window Operator, SBP, Kurali Branch vide their order</h4> <h4>dated 22.11.2006, is legal and justified? To what relief the workman is entitled?"</h4> <p>1. The facts, in brief, are that, the workman appeared and filed claim statement, alleging therein that he was employed as Single Window Operator with the respondent-bank at Kurali Branch. The workman/claimant rendered unblemished service of 26 years and has always maintained highest level of personal integrity and honesty in his conduct and dealings. The workman/claimant has also performed duties of accepting withdrawal forms and cheques from the customers and making payment to the customers in accordance with the prescribed procedure, norms and well established practices of the respondent-bank. The said procedure is invariably followed by the workman. It is not out of place to mention that banking business has to be carried out at the branch even when the staff is short due to absence of employees and various practices to copy up with the work pressures, even though, deviant form the prescribed rules have to be adopted and implemented as the business cannot be closed down on any pretext. It is not uncommon at the ranch functional model especially in the semi urban branches that the Branch Manager or any other officer of the bank could first pay the customer in a hurry and thereafter could insist for payment from the Cashier of Single Window Operator in respect of a withdrawal of cheque drawn by a customer of a bank, apparently to make good the payment already made or to deliver such payment to the customer in question. The claimant having to his credit 26 years experience in the bank bona fide states that such practice of routing the cash transaction through the other officers at the branch level is well accepted and well established practice without ant taint or trapping of illegality or impropriety. Subsequently, one Malkit Singh, Head Cashier at the branch had committed fraud and various payments from the claimant stood wrongly pocketed by said Malkiat Singh. Consequently, various investigations were carried out in the matter and Sh. Malkit Singh also admitted his lapse. Ultimately, disciplinary authority acting unreasonably and hastily order a departmental enquiry against the claimant and passed a punishment order dated 22.11.2006 which is marked as Annexure C-3. Aggrieved by the said order, the workman/claimant preferred an appeal to the appellate-authority dated 19.12.2006 which is marked as Annexure C-3. The appellate-authority vide its order dated 07.09.2007 rejected the appeal of the workman by a non- speaking perfunctory and mechanical order without considering the facts on record. A copy of the impugned order dated 07.09.2007 of the appellate-authority which was forwarded vide letter dated 11.09.2007 to the claimant is marked as Annexure C-5(Colly). The claimant/workman raised a demand notice dated 23.04.2010 before the Assistant Labour Commissioner which is marked as Annexure C-6 and reply to the said demand notice filed by the respondent-bank is marked as Annexure C-7. It is prayed that the claim may kindly be allowed and the impugned orders dated 07.09.2007, 11.09.2007 and 22.11.2006 be set aside and the basic pay be restored by notionally wiping out the effect of impugned orders and financial loss suffered by the claimant may kindly be compensated by payment of appropriate interest to meet the ends of justice.</p> <p>2. Respondent-management filed written statement, alleging therein that the workman/claimant while working as Single Window Operator posted at Kurali has committed serious acts of misconduct for which he was served a charge- sheet dated 01.06.2006. He also alleged that the present reference deserves to be dismissed on the ground of mis-joinder and non-joinder. He has admitted that the workman was accepting the withdrawal forms, cheques and making payments to the customers. He further alleged that the workman/claimant was not performing his duties as per norms of the bank and was negligent, deviant from prescribed rules in performing his duties. It has further stated that it was proved on record that the workman had made the payment of withdrawal form to Malkiat Singh, Head Cashier of the Branch instead of account-holder which resulted into a fraud which has tarnished the image of the Bank among the general public and may weed off potential customers from approaching the Bank for banking purposes. The workman/claimant has himself admitted that he had made the payment to Malkiat Singh instead of account holder which is against the Bank's instructions, rules and norms as contained in Chapter B-3, Para 6.1(a&k) of the Bank's Book of Instructions. Hence, the action of the disciplinary authority in awarding the punishment and taking a lenient view in the matter is legal, just and in accordance with law and the punishment is quite commensurate with the gravity of charges leveled against him. It is therefore, prayed that the present reference may kindly be dismissed in view of the facts narrated above.</p> <p>3. Both the parties were given opportunity to lead evidence.</p> <p>4. Workman Paramjit Singh has filed his affidavit Ex.W1 and has been cross-examined by the management- counsel. Management examined Sh. Kewal Krishan Sharma, Assistant General Manager, who filed his affidavit Ex.R1. This witness is not examined by the workman-counsel as the workman was proceeded ex parte on 28.07.2015.</p> <p>5. At the stage of arguments, workman filed an application for withdrawal of the claim along with his affidavit, stating therein that the respondent-management took a lenient view in favour of the applicant/workman in the context of his promotions in the career path of the applicant/workman and requested that the application may kindly be allowed and the reference may kindly be returned with a finding that the claim of the applicant/workman has become infructuous and the reference does not consequently survive for adjudication. Both the parties prayed that the reference be decided in the light of settlement arrived at between the parties.</p> <span class="header-text">[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : अक्तूबर 26, 2019/कार्तिक 4, 1941 7367</span> <p>6. It is now well settled position in law that any settlement arrived at between the parties is legally binding upon both the parties in terms of the provisions of Section 18 of the ID Act. In view of the amicable settlement, there is no requirement to proceed with the present reference. The application for withdrawal of the claim along with affidavit of the workman shall form the integral part of the Award.</p> <p>7. Let copy of this award be sent to Central Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the ID Act, 1947.</p> <p>A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>ubZ fnYyh] 21 vDrwcj] 2019</h4> <p>dk-vk- 1887....————vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj loZ gfj;k.kk xkzeh.k cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ua- 2 paMhx< ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 114@2014] 115@2014] 116@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 21-10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA</p> <p>[la- ,y&12012@06] 08] 07@2015&vkbZvkj ¼ch&1)]</p> <p>ch- ,l- fc'V] voj lfpo</p> <h4>New Delhi, the 21st October, 2019</h4> <p>S.O. 1887.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 114,115,116/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.-II, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Serve Haryana Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 21.10.2019.</p> <p>[No. L-12012/06, 08, 07/2015– IR(B-1)]</p> <p>B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.</p> <h4>ANNEXURE</h4> <h4>IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH</h4> <p>Present: Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer</p> <h4>1. ID No.114/2014</h4> <h4>Registered On:-02.03.2015</h4> <p>Sh. Hari Prem S/o Sh. Inderjeet, C/o Sh. Rajinder Pathak, Chamber No.169-C, Lawyers Chambers, District Court, Gurgaon (HR).</p> <h4>2. ID No.115/2014</h4> <h4>Registered On:-02.03.2015</h4> <p>Sh. Tamir Khan, S/o Sh. Mauj Khan, C/o Sh. Rajinder Pathak, Chamber No.169-C, Lawyers Chambers, District Court, Gurgaon(HR).</p> <h4>3. ID No.116/2014</h4> <h4>Registered On:-02.03.2015</h4> <p>Sh. Des Raj S/o Sh. Suraj Bhan, C/o Sh. Rajinder Pathak, Chamber No. 169-C, Lawyers Chambers, District Court, Gurgaon (HR). …Workmen</p> <h4>Versus</h4> <p>1. The Chairman, Serve Haryana Gramin Bank, H.O.-Near Bajrang Bhawan, Delhi Road, Rohtak (HR)-124001.</p> <p>2. The Nodal/Regional Officer, Serve Haryana Gramin Bank, Pargati Bhawan, Sector-44, Gurgaon (HR).</p> <span class="header-text">7368 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 26, 2019/KARTIKA 4, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]</span> <p>3. The Sr. Manager, Serve Haryana Gramin Bank,</p> <p>Branch Tikri City, Gurgaon (Haryana). …Respondents/Management</p> <h4>AWARD</h4> <h4>Passed on:-03.09.2019</h4> <p>Central Government vide Notification No. L-12012/06/2015-IR(B-I), L-12012/08/2015-IR(B-I), L-12012/07/2015-IR(B-I), Dated 30.01.2015, under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial disputes separately for each workmen related to the Department of Haryana Gramin Bank for adjudication to this Tribunal:—</p> <h4>"Whether the action of the management of Serve Haryana Gramin Bank(formerly known as Gurgaon</h4> <h4>Gramin Bank), Gurgaon in terminating the services of Sh. Hari Prem, (Sh. Tamir Khan, Sh. Desh Raj)</h4> <h4>w.e.f. 05.12.2013 is valid, just and legal? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and</h4> <h4>from which date?"</h4> <p>1. Since the all above mentioned references are same hence, they are decided by common judgment.</p> <p>2. Both the parties were served with notices. The workman appeared through his counsel Sh. Arun Batra. An opportunity is given to the workman for submission of the claim statement but, in spite of the several opportunities, claimant did not file any claim petition. During the pendency of the proceeding before this Tribunal, workman did not turn up for setting aside the ex parte order dated 03.09.2015, compelling the learned counsel of the claimant Sh. Arun Batra for permission to withdraw from the case and informed that workman is not in touch with him as such, he is unable to submit claim statement in the case. Learned counsel further requested that he may be permitted to withdraw from the present case and requested that appropriate order be passed.</p> <p>3. In view of the above facts and statement made by the learned counsel of the workman, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a 'No Dispute/Claim Award'. Since there is no adjudication of claim petition or case on merits as such, it would not preclude the workman from seeking fresh reference in accordance with Law.</p> <p>4. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.</p> <p>5. Copy of the award be kept in ID No.115/2014 titled as Tamir Khan Vs. Serve Haryana Gramin Bank and ID No.116/2014 titled as Des Raj Vs. Serve Haryana Gramin Bank.</p> <p>A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer</p> <p>Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064</p> <p>and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.</p> </body> </html>