रजिस्ट्री गं ० डी० 221
REGISTERED No. D. 221
भारत का राजपत्र
The Gazette of India
असाधारण
EXTRAORDINARY
भाग 1-खण्ड 1
PART I - Section 1
प्राधिकार से प्रहाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
सं० 62] नई दिल्ली वृहस्पतिवार अप्रैल 4 , 1968/चंत्रज्येष्ठ 15 , 1890
No. 62 ] NEW DELHI , THURSDAY , APRIL 4 , 1968 / CHAITRA 15 , 1890
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके ।
Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation.
MINISTRY OF LABOUR , EMPLOYMENT & REHABILITATION
(Department of Labour & Employment )
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi , the 3rd April 1968
No. F.55 ( 43 ) / 66 - LRIV . In continuation of the Ministry of Labour , Employ- ment andand Rehabilitation ( Department of Labour and Employment ) notification No. 5.O. 920 , dated the 19th February , 1968 , published at pages 1 to 309 in the Gazette of India , Extraordinary Part II Section 3 Sub - section ( ii ) , dated the 5th March , 1968 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Order dated the 27th March, 1968 of Shri T. L. Venkatarama Aiyar , Arbitrator , on a petition before him under Rule 28 of the Industrial Disputes ( Central ) Rules , 1957 in arbitration proceeding under section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Reserve Bank of India (and its workmen employees in Classes Il and I
(265) 266
THE GAZEITE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I - SEC. 1 ]
BEFORE THE HON'BLE ARBITRATOR , SHRI T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR , RETIRED SUPREME COURT JUDGE
(Reference under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 )
BETWEEN
The Reserve Bank of India
AND
Its workmen Employees in Class II and III
Award dated 12th February , 1968
Petition under Rule 28 of the Industrial Disputes ( Central ) Rules , 1957 .
Bombay, the 27th March 1968
ORDER
On 22nd of March 1968 , Shri K. T. Sule appearing on behalf of the All - India Reserve Bank Employees ' Association filed a petition asking for an opportunity to file objections to the Award with respect to alleged mistakes and on that I passed an Order set out in Annexure I. Pursuant to that Order , the Association has as filed a petition before me setting out various objectionsobjections to the Award . Copy of this petition has been served on the Bank. At the hearing of the peti- tion today. Shri Sule appeared on behalf of the Association in support of it ; Shri N. V. Phadke opposed it on behalf of the Bank . A representative of the All- India Reserve Bank Workers ' Organisation also appeared before me and while maintaining that the question of the Index should not be re - opened , supported the Association with respect to the alleged mistakes and slips .
2. Before considering the objections on the merits it will be useful to refer to the arguments addressed before me on the scope of Rule 28 of the Industrial Disputes ( Central ) Rules , 1957. The rule runs as follows : -
"The Labour Court , Tribunal , National Tribunal or arbitrator may correct any clerical mistake or error arising from an accidental slip or omis- sion in any award it/ he issues . "
The argument of Shri Sule on behalf of the Association is that the words " any clerical mistake or error arising from an accidental slip or omission " should be read disjunctively and that even errors in expressing the intention of the Arbitrator could be corrected . On behalf of the Bank Shri Phadke contends that the rule should be construed strictly and , in support of his argument , relies on the decision in Sutherland and Company v . Hannevig Brothers Ltd. , [ 1921 ( 1 ) Κ.Β. 336] . In that case an Arbitrator whowho had ordered costs in favour of one of the disputants amended it ( subsequently by providing that the party was entitled to the whole of the costs and not merely a part . The reason given by the Arbitra- tor was that that was his real intention . It was held by the High Court that the order of amendment was without jurisdiction . Reference was also made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Master Construction Company vs. State of Orissa under Rule 83 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules , 1947 , (A.I.R. 1966 S.C. 1047 ) . In that case the Commissioner of Sales Tax who had passed an order directing a refund of excess sales tax paid by a party subsequently amended it by order- ing refund subject to certain deductions . The question was whether this was a clerical mistake or a slip within Rule 83 , such as would give jjurisdiction to the Commissioner to amend the carlier order . It was held by the Supreme Court that the rule in question did not authorise a reconsideration of the question on the merits or permit reargument on grounds not urged before . There is no doubt as to the law on the subject . It will not be open to the authority acting under rule 28 to allow any amendment relating to the merits of the decision. It is only when there is a mistake or omission in the nature of an error or slip that the jurisdiction under the rule can be invoked . Where the mistake is . as for example , in typing the draft or in printing it, it would obviously fall within the rule . Where the contention relates purely to the merits of the case , it will fall outside it . A difficult question might arise where the language of the Award does not correctly reflect what was intended to be decided. ItIt is in this class of cases that there is scope for divergence of judicial opinion .
267 [PART I- SEQ, I ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
The decisions in such cases turn generally on the facts of each case , The law on the subject was thus stated in the judgment of the Supreme Court cited above: -
"An arithmetical mistake is a mistake of calculation ; a clerical mis- take is a mistake in writing or typing . An error arising out of or occur- ring from an accidental slip or omission is an error due to a careless mis- take or omission unintentionally made . The accidental slip or 'omis- sion is an accidental slip or omission made by the court . The obvious instance is a slip or omission to embody in (the order something which the court in fact ordered to be done . This is sometimes described as a decretal order not being in accordance with the judgment . But the slip or omission may be attributed to the Judge himself. He may say some- thing or omit to say somethingng which he did not intend to say or omit . This is described as a slip or omission in the judgment itself . The cause for such a slip or omission may be Judge's inadvertence or the advocate's mistake. "
Bearing these principles inin mindmind , I shall now proceed to deal with the several points raised by the Association in the petition inin thet order in which they are stated therein : --
1. Stenographers .It is common ground that Stenographers form a promo- tional grade fromom Typists . Conformably to this , under the Desai Award , the maximum was fixed at Rs . 430 / - for Typists , that for Stenographers Grade II at Rs . 450/ - , and for Stenographers Grade I at Rs . 485 /- . Under the present Award, the maximum pay of the Typist is Rs . 540/- , and that of Stenograph Grade I Rs . 600/-. The Typists are given a Special Pay of Rs . 15 / p.m. from the very beginning, and in addition thereto , a Special Pay of Rs . 20 / - p.m. after nine years. years . On behalf of the Association it is pointed out that in view of the Special Pay of Rs . 35 / - , the Typists get more than Stenographers Grade II though the latter are a promotional grade . The answer of the Bank to this con- tention is that when a Typist is promoted as a Stenographer Grade 11. his pay in the higher grade will not . under the rules of fitment , suffer in fact any dimi- nution . But even so , the anomaly will remain , of the substantive pay in the promotional cadre being less than that of the lower cadre . It is the contention of the Bank that this question is one relating to the merits of the decision and not involving any mistake or slip . But the facts relating to this matter are somewhat unusual . The pav scale fixed in this original draft for Typists did not include the Special Pay of Rs . 20 / p.m. , and when the draft was revised by inclusion of that amount, it was noticed that the position of the Stecographer Grade II , as belonging to a promotional cadre , should be readjusted and that for that purpose. it would be sufficient to increase the span in his case to 18 years and include this , as a category by itself and by a slip this decision was not incor- porated in the final draft . This is a mistake which should be rectified . That will be done by inserting the category of Stenographer Grade II, as Group I - B with the scale as follows : -
( i ) At page 238 of the Award , read " Group II - A " for " Group II ".
( ii ) " Group ІІ - В" :
1. Stenographer Grade II Rs . 230-15-320 - EB - 15-335-25-460- EB I 어 1 5
-25-585 . 5
(18 vears )"
( iii ) Group III will be amended by omitting Stenographers and other conse- quential changes made .
2. Caretaker Grade II. This is a promotional grade for Assistant Caretakers and accordingly , under the Desai Award , the maximum pay of Caretaker Grade II was Rs . 430/- , while that of the Assistant Caretaker was Rs . 420/- . Under the present Award the maximum for the Caretaker Grade II is Rs . 535/- while that of the Assistant Caretaker is Rs . 540/ - . 'This is clearly a case of mistake . In this case also a decision had been taken to increase the span of Caretaker Grade II to 14 years and by a slip this has not been carried out . This amendment will be carried out and the consequential corrections made .
3. Air - Conditioning Plant and Electrical Supervisor . Under the present Award , the scale of the Electrician Grade I is Rs . 230-560 and that of the Air- Con- ditioning Plant and Electrical Supervisor Rs . 310-550 . The Association contends that the Electrician Grade I is promoted as Air - Conditioning Plant and Electrical Supervisor and that therefore the scale of fees for the latter must be higher and that accordingly the present scale of Air - Conditioning Plant and Electrical THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
268
[PART I- SEC . I
Supervisor , which is less than that of Electrician Grade I : is a mistake . The Bank denies that Air - Conditioning Plant and Electrical Supervisor is a promo- tional cadre . This is not a case of mistake .
4. Clerks Grade I. Under the Desai Award the scale of pay for Clerks Grade I was. Rs . 150-420 plus Rs . 12 as Special Pay while that of the Typist was Rs . 165-430 , Under the present Award the scale for both Clerks Grade 1 and Typists is the same; but while the Special Pav for Clerks Grade I is Rs . 20, that of the Typists is Rs . 35, at the maximum . The contention of the Association is that this is a mistake and that the scale of Clerks Grade I should be raised so as to give him a lead. But there is no mistake whatsoever in this matter . It was pressed by the Association that in view of the strenuous nature of the work of Typists and want of adequate promotional avenues to them , they should receive special consideration . This contention has been accepted and there is no question of mistake .
maximum pay admissible Under the present Award The Association submits 5. Junior Draftsman . Under the Desai Award , the for the Junior Draftsman and the Typist was the same . the Typists get , at the maximum , Rs . 35 p.m. more. that there is no ground for making a distinction between them , that the fixing of a lower maximum for the Junior Draftsmanis a mistake and that this should be corrected . The difference is the result of valuation of the respective jobs of the two categories . There is no mistake .
6 ( A) Telephone Operator Grade I. Under the Desai Award , the maximum pay for both the Telephone Operators G. I and Typists was Rs . 430. Under the present Award the maximum for the Telephone Operators Grade I is Rs . 560 whereas that of the Typists is Rs . 575. The contention of the Association is that the maximum pay of the Telephone Operators Grade I should be the same as that of the Typists . I am unable to see any mistake in this .
( B) Comptometer Operator and Adrema Machine Operator und 6 8 ( C ) Sorter Operator , Tabulator Operator and Fund Machine Operator . The substance of the complaint with reference to these categories is that under the revised scale the employees will get less than what they would be entitled to get under the Desai Award , that this was not intended and is therefore a mistake that should be rectified . The whole of this argument rests on a comparison of the dearness allowance under the Working Class Index and that under the Middle Class Index , and is really one relating to the merits of the decision . There is no mistake justifying modification .
7. Special Pay of Rs . 20/- for the Categories who have inadequate or nor avenues of promotion . The Association claims that the Special Pay of Rs . 20/- p.m. given to Typists should be given to certain other categories of employees also on the ground that they stand on the same footing as Typists in that they have no adequate promotional avenues . There is no mistake whatsoever in this . The Typists have been given a Special Pay on account of the nature of their job , as also , on account of their inadequate promotional avenues .
8. Punch Operators . This is clearly a case of mistake . In para . 3.125 , their Special Pay is fixed at Rs . 25 but under para 3.142 at page 239 , it is stated as Rs. 20. It ought to be Rs . 25 p.m.
9 ( A) Special fitment given under the Fitnent Formula to those whose starting scales under thethe Desai Award were higher than the clerical scale . The Associa- tion claims that initial increments ought to be given to certain specified categories of workmen and that the failure to do so is a mistake . But it will be seen from paragraph 4.5 that the question of fitment has been considered from all stand points , that in some cases one increment has been given , in others , two . and in certain other cases , Special Pay . There is no mistake .
9 ( B ) Protection of total emoluments under the Desai Award . The Award provides that persons who , on the date of fitment , get less under this Award, than what they were getting under the Desai Award . should be paid the difference as 'Personal Allowance ' . The Association demands that a similar direction should be given as regards the emoluments even subsequent to the date of fitment , if they are less . The Bank strongly opposes the claim and contends that its adoption would result in the existence of two parallel schemes running side by side for years and years . It is sufficient for the present purpose to say that there is no mistake which could be corrected under Rule 28 .
10. Middle Class Index .- The Association asserts that there has been a mistake in the rate of neutralisation given in the Award with reference to Dearness Allowance. It is said that 75 per cent of neutralisation applying the Working THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I - SEC , I ]
269
Class Index , as per Desai Award , would work out at 112.96 per cent in terms of the Middle Class Index and that the rate of 90 per cent and 75 per cent neutralisation is therefore a mistake . The Bank points out that the 75 per cent Working Class Index has reference to the fixation of the wages for the basic year , 1960 , and that the fixation of 90 per cent and 75 per cent for dearness allowance during the subsequent years is quite a different subject and that the two have no connection . This is really a question turning on the merits of the decision . No question of mistake is involved .
10 ( A ) Graduate Allowance and C.A.I.I.B. Allowance : and 10 ( B) Increments . The contention of the Association that the Special Pay prescribed for employees passing certain examinations is really much less than what is intended to be awarded in view of the lower Middle Class Index figures , raises , again , a question on the merits . So , also the question of increments. No mistake is involved .
10 ( C) Departure from Bipartite Settlement which has been accepted as the basis for fixation of wages of workmen employees of the Reserve Bank of India.- Lastly,ly, itit is said that though the Award decides that the emoluments under this Award should be comparable with those of the commercial banks under the Bipartite Settlement , in fact, they are not comparable . The question is considered in the Award in Chapter III and the result summed up in para 3.143 and Appendix 'D' sets out the comparative emoluments as on 1st January 1966. The real com- plaint appears to be that as the result of the Middle Class Index figure being less than the Working Class Index figures , the emoluments are comparatively less . There is no mistake in the figures as given as on 1st January 1966. nor is there a clerical or arithmetical error open for correction . I should mention that in the course of the hearing the Association filed five statements with the object of showing that under the present Award the emoluments of some of the employees are by comparison less than under the Desai Award . The correctness of the statements has not been admitted by the Bank and in view of the fact that this raises only a question on the merits and not on any mistake , I consider it unneces- sary to pursue the matter further
The representative of the Organisation , who has appeared at this hearing has argued that there is a mistake in the finding relating to House Rent Allowance . and that where the employee is accommodated in a tenement belonging to the Bank , he should be charged , not as at present , 15 per cent of the ' pay as rent but only 5 per cent . This claim relates to the merits of the decision and is not a mistake .
In Annexure II, ( Errata et Corrigenda) are set out all the mistakes , errors and slips including clerical and printing mistakes , with corrections .
(Sd . ) T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR .
Arbitrator .
H- 22, ' Badhwar Park" . Colaba , Bombay .
ANNEXURE I
BEFORE THE HONOURABLE ARBITRATOR , SHRI T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR RETIRED SUPREME COURT JUDGE
(Reference under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 )
BETWEEN
The Reserve Bank of India
AND
Its workmen employees in Class II and III . RE: Memorandum dated 22nd March 1968 submitted by the All- India Reserve Bank Employees ' Association Madras , dated 22nd March 1968
ORDER
In this arbitration reference , the Award was signed by me on the 12th February 1968 and sent to the Central Government and it has been published in the Gazette of India , Extraordinary , dated 5th March 1968. Shri Sule , on behalf of the Asso- 270
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I - SEC . 1 ]
ciation has submitted a memorandum in which it is said that there are certain anomalies , errors and omissions in the Award as published which call for correction . Now it is well settled that the Award in final once it is signed and it is not open to review on the merits but that if there are clerical mistakes , errors , or slips , they can be corrected . Shri Sule concedes that position . Therefore , it is open to me to correct only what are strictly speaking , clerical mistakes , errors or slips . In this view . Shri Sule proposes to file a list setting out the errors , mistakes and slips , with specific reference to specific paragraphs of the Award . Under Sections 20(3) read with 17A ( 1 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the proceedings would be pending before me for 30 days after the publication of the Award. I have , therefore , power to correct the errors at any time before the 5th of April 1968 . I accordingly direct that the Association do prepare a petition setting out the errors , mistakes and slips with respect to which amendments might be required, and serve a copy thereof on the Bank , on or before Monday , the 25th of March 1968. On the 27th of March 1968 the said petition will be heard by me at H - 22 , 'Badhwar Park ' , Colaba , Bombay at 3-00 p.m. The Bank also will be given notice thereol . The petition will be considered by me and appropriate orders passed and the amendments to the Award , if any, as finally decided by me will be sent to the Central Government .
Sri Vidya Vilas '
81, Mowbray's Road , Alwaret , Madras .
22nd March 1968 .
Copy to:-
( Sd. ) T. L. VENKATARAMA ATYAR ,
Arbitrator .
( 1 ) The Chief Manager , Reserve Bank of India , Central Office , Department of Administration and Personnel Bombay - 1 .
( 2 ) The General Secretary , All - India Reserve Bank Employees ' Association , c . o Reserve Bank of India , Bombay -1 .
ANNEXURE II
Errata et Corrigenda
Line No.
Pare No.
Page
Sl . No. No. of the Gazette
2
I
3
4
II
I
Error
Correction
6
5
" 14"
184
" 14th"
"Association to "
2 184 1.2 9 "Association , to '*
185 2'I I " narate " " narrate "
3
4 185 2.2 25 "Justice P.BΒ. " Justice Shri P.B.
Gajendragadkar "
Gajendragadkar "
186
2.4 4
5
" in 1954"
" in September 1954 "
188
6
3.5 28
" employer . " and "
" employer ," and"
" increase in "
3'10 το
189
7
" increase the "
"The fnctions "
190
3.12 8
8
" The functions "
" financial , matters , "
191
3.15 7
9
" financial matters , "
" that Act is "
191
3.15 16
" that Act , is "
" entered into . in "
II
192
3.16 20
" entered into , in ""
"will lie ..... "
"will lie"
12
192
3.16 23
" etc. and"
13 192 3.17 24 " etc. , and"
14 192 3-17 27 " 1964 ( 3 ) S.C.R. " (1964 ( 3 ) S.C.R.
624 , A.I.R. "
624, (A.I.R. "
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I-810 , 1 ]
Page No. Para No. Line No.
SI . No of the Gazette
I
2
3
4
193
15
3.18 14
271
Correction
Error
6
5
"penson"
16
193
3.20 I
"person"
" In my view. "
17
IO
193
3.20
"În my view, "
" any business , trade ,
" any business trade under- taking manufacture ,"
193
320 II
undertaking , manu-
facture,"
" any calling,"
"any calling."
19
195
"work . in"
3.24 7
20
195
"work , in"
" In that case ."
3.24 27
21
195
3.25 15
In that case, "
"para. 4. 166)."
"para . 4,166 ) . "
22
195
3.27 3
"Now. the"
23
196
3.29 7
"Now, the"
"words , comparable"
"words comparable "
24
198
" as that"
3:34 II
25
199
3 34 3
" and that"
"against"
26
200
"again"
"Government . that"
3'37 22
201
27
3.40 12
"Government , that"
"that " Assurances .
"that " Assurances ,
however,"
however,"
28
201
3.41 8
"pay, house rent , "
"pay house rent ,"
29
201
"Ext ."
3'42 1
202
30
10
"Exs ."
" besides."
3.42 "besides ,"
31 202 3.43 28 "that" "than"
32 203 3.44 3 " not" " no"
33 204 3.48 32 "base - year ; and "
" base - year and "
34
204
"concerns is ,"
"concerns is."
3'49 17
35
205
"calss . "
"class ,"
3'52 I
206
36
" an all - India "
" all all - India "
3.54 14
207
37
I
" observed : "
" observed ; "
3-54
38
207
3.56 5
"base year ,"
"base year"
208
39
3.59 11
"Expenditure pattern , "Expenditure pattern ,
which form the principle "
208
40
3.61 5
which form the principal"
"drawn a single"
208
41
8/9
3.61
"drawn from a single"
" internally"
"internaly"
208
42
3.61 21
" smaples . "
"samples,"
43 210 3.64 4 " te" " the"
44 210 3.66 2/3 " method and the other "method which was ad-
the interview method . defective and cannot be opted in the Survey is
The former consists in
asking as a safe basis " accepted as a safe basis "
45 210 3.66 11 "also:" "also;"
46 211 3.66 17 " 1966 I L.L.J. 1 at 25 ] . " 1966 I L.L. 1. 111 2 :
"Besides,"
Besides,"
211
3.67 6
47
"disadvantage ,"
" disadvantage . "
48 212 3.70 14 "work ." "work,"
49 213 3.72 5 " features " " feature"
"monthly"
" monthby"
3.77 6/7
214
50
3.78 6
51
" groups ; and "
"groups and"
215
216
" and footwear: "
" and footwear;"
3.80 11
52
216
" 7-1 to 7.4 "
" 7 : 1 to 7 : 4"
3.80 38
53
"Rs . "
" Its . " 216
3.81 16
54 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
272
Sl . No.
Page No. Para No. Line No. of the Gazette
2
I
4
3
[PART I - SEC . I ]
Error
Correction
6
5
" therein"
55
217
6/7
3.81
217
" therein,"
" favouraby"
56
3.81 7
57
217
"favourably"
"pblished"
3.82 5
" inex"
I
58
217
3-83
"published"
" index"
"mvements "
59 217 3.85 2 " movements " 60 217 3.83 29 " bisk" " brisk " 51 218 3.85 9 " so ," " 80 ," 62
" I should and
3.89 12
219
I
" I should add"
" as what "
63 220 3.92 " as to what "
64 220 3.92 4 " 2:25" " 2.25"
220 3.92 7
" para . 65) ."
65
66
220
" 2:25"
3.92 16
220
" para , 65) , "
" 2'25"
"captain"
3.94 2
67
68
221
"caption"
"The Association ,"
3.94 19
221
69
The Association ,"
"prepared vide"
3.95 5
221
70
3.97 10
" prepared ( vide "
"paid 5 per cent . "
" paid 15 per cent ."
"Commission"
221
71
3.98 8
"Commission , "
" make for different
221
9/10
72
3.98
"make for differences
levels"
222
at different levels"
"Government State"
3.99 3
73
222
3.99 7
"Government , State "
" repercussions"
" repercussion"
74
75 222 3.101 5 "Tallers " "Tellers"
76 223 3.103 7 " in order" " an order"
225 " recommend "
" recommended "
3.106 5
77
3.106 8
223
"frequently"
78
1.108
225
79
"frequency"
" 23 Year ( s ) "
22 (Table No. I)
226
80
"(23 years) "
"Telex Operator,"
3.108 10 (Table No. 1)
226
81
"Telex Operator ,
" Cmoptometer Operator "
3.108 15 (Table No. 1)
82
227 3.108 Below Line 10
" Comptometer Operator "
Award
" *Post-Desai Category "
" (21 years "
227
83
3.108 25 (Table No. I)
227
84
3.108
"( 21 Years) "
"Rs . 155/ 1-5/ 2-165- 8/2-191-
33 Table No. I) Typist
" Rs.155/1-5/2-155- 8/ 2-181-
16/6-395" 10/1-191-EB- 10/ 3 221- 12/4-269- EB- 15 /2-299
10 / 1-191-Ε.Β. - 10/3- 221-12 221-12/4-269-EB- 15/2-299-16/6-395 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
(PART I - SEC . I ]
Para No.
Sl . No.
Line No. Page No. of the Gazette
2
I
3
4
228
3.10 2
85
273
Frror
Correction
6
5
"Rs . 175 / 1-10 /4-215- 12/ 3-215-EB- 12/ 2- 275-20/ 7-415"
(Table No. 1) Steno- grapher Grade II
228
86
" Rs . 175/ 1-10/4-215- 12/3-251 -EB-12/2 275-20/ 7-415 "
" Punch Operator "
3.108 25 (Table No. I )
228
" Punch Operator,"
"Ad-hoc-Allowances"
87
3.108 32 (Table No. I )
88
232 3.118 9
"Ad- hoc Allowance "
years of service . "
232
89
3.120 5
years of service , and onon crossingcrossing tthe firsteffi- ciencybar."
" in the Railways "
90
233
" " in the Railways "
" Jurisdiction "
3 123 3
91
234 3.125 2
" Justification "
" onja par Assistants "
92
" on par with Assistants "
" R- 67 "
234 3.128 13 " A - 67 "
93 235 3.130 5 "As " " A "
94 235 3.130 9 "Rs . 15/ - per mensem " " Rs . 20/ - per mensem "
95 236 3.134 20 "Group III on a scale " Group IIB on a scale
of Rs . 230-560 " of Rs . 230-585 "
96 236
" Photostate "
3.136 6
97
236
" Photostat "
" varous "
3.138 2
98
" various "
" Grade I and II "
237 3.140 I
238
99
3-142
" Grades I and II "
"Category of Staff "
5 (Table No. 4)
100
238
" Categories of Staff "
" Group II "
3.142 32 (Table No. 4)
ΣΟΙ
238 3.142 Below Line 34 (Table No. 4)
102
238
3142
" Group II A "
" Group II B : 1. Stenographer Gr . II .
Rs . 230 / 1-15 / 6-320- EB-15 / 1-335-25/ 5- 460 -BB-25/5-585. (18 years ) "
Delete this portion .
" 3. Stenographer
Grade II . "
39 (Table No. 4)
103
238 3 142
" I. Caretaker Gr . II .
" r . Caretaker Grade II .
41 (Tal le No. 4)
Rs . 275/ 1-15/4-335-25/1 360-EB-25 / 8--560 .
Rs . 275 / 1-15 /4-335- 25/1-360 -EB- 25/ 7-535 (13 yeers)"
104
239 3 142
(14 years) "
"9. Punch Operator ..
) Rs . 20 /
45 ats (II Special pay
"9. Punch Operator .. Rs . 25/ -" THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
274
Line No.
Para No.
Sl . No. of the Gazette Page No.
2
I
3
4
[PART I- SEC . I ]
Error
Correction
6
5
" 10. Auto - Verifier
46
239 3 142
105
" 10. Auto - Verifier Operator ..
Operator .
Rs . 20/ -"
( II Special pay)
106
4'3 3
241
Rs. 25/- ."
" A.I.R. 1963 1327 ,"
"A.I.R. 1963 S.C. 1327 "
" Operator ."
4.5 II
241
107
" is " 108
242
4 ^ - 5 14
Operator,"
" are "
" wree "
109
242
5 ^ . I 13
242
" were "
" Salary "
5 ^ *2 7
Sastry "
" of lump sum
ود
III
244
5.8 7
" of a lump sum "
" examination "
112
244
S^ * II 7
" examinations "
دو
per mensem
245
6r 10/11
113
246
per mense , "
approved " the princi-
7 ^ *2 II
114
ple"
" approved the principle"
" Allowance " , ( page "
246
115
7 ^ - 2 13
" Allowance , (page "
" Stepply "
116
246
7 ^ 2 34
" steeply "
" allowed "
246
117
7 ^ *2 43
" allowed ,"
" Dearness Allowance "
118
247
7 ^ *2 4
" Dearness Allowance . "
" Middle Class Index ."
247
7.3 10
119
120
7.3 17
" Middle Class Index, "
" when the basic pay "
247
" when the pay "
" for the basic pay "
121 247 7.3 18 " for the pay " 122 247 7-4 23
" Special pay , and
officiating pay"
8.3
special pay, personal pay and officiating pay"
"Rs . 30 "
4
248
123
"Rs . 300"
" Delhi "
248
8.3 7
124
12/13
8.3
248
" New Delhi "
"Rs . 100 to Rs . 300/ - "
125
(in the table under the column 'pay' )
8.8 8
" Rs . ICO to Rs . 3000 / - "
"(page 83 ,
"
126
249
" (page 89 , "
" I ame "
8.10 I
249
127
8.11 16
" I am "
" have ' in addition "
250
128
250
8-12 8/9
129
" have , in addition "
"special pay
and officiating pay
Below para
250
130
8-14
" special pay , personal pay and officiating pay "
" II . travelling and
Halting Allowance :"
" II . travelling and Halting Allowances ; "
he rate of "
8.22 II
252
131
" the rate of "
" he station "
132 352 8.22 17 " the station "
252 8-23 3 " Rs . 2-50 "
" Rs . 2 : 50 "
133
" where "
134 252 8-23 5 " whereas " 135 252 8-23 9 " the " The "
circumstances "
8-24 14
253
136
" circumstances ,"
" should have "
8-24 17
253
137
" should have , "
" on tour "
8.24 18
253
138
on tour," THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I- SEC . I ]
Para No. Line No. Sl . Page No. No. of the Gazette
I
2
4
3
275
Error
Correction
6
5
" vife"
139
253
8-26 3
"wife"
"is that"
14.0
253
8-28 4
" is that ,"
" service"
8.28 8
141
253
142
" service , "
"elonging"
254
8.29 14
" belonging"
" as if it a"
255
8.32 II 143
" as if it were a"
" outside station : "
" out side station : "
144
255
8-34 (below para.)
"Workman"
145
255
8.35 2
"Workmen"
"draws less ,"
"draws less"
146
255
8-36 5
256
147
8-39 7
"5:31"
" 5.31 "
" in a month"
148
257
8.41 2
" is a month "
"cantonment area "
149 257 8.42 6 "cantonment area , " 150 257 8-43 6 "diem ." "diem,"
" Centre"
151 257 8-43 9 "centre" 152 257 8.44 I " 3.44"
I
" 8-44"
" my opinion . "
153 257 8.44 "my opinion , "
154 257 8-44 5 " 8 kilometers from" " 8 kilometers , or beyondi
thereof, from"
'155 8.44 6 "charges,"
" charges"
257
" casual leave . "
156 258 8-47 21 "casual leave ,"
157 258 8-48 3 " I often" " It often"
" remittance."
"remittance"
158
258
8.48 5
" training"
258
159
8.49 9
160
'treating"
" end"
" ends"
258
8.50 3
" launch: "
161
258
8.50 5
" lunch;"
"which . "
162 259 8.55 9 "which,"
163 259 8.55 11 "(page 53 , para 178) " "(page 53 , para 178 ) ,"
164 260 8-57 8 "that the increment " "that one increment "
260
"Organisation "
8.59 1
165
260
"Organisation . "
" vacancy ,"
166
8.59 7
" vacancy,"
" an it be"
260
8.59 10 167
168
260
8.59 22/24
" can it be"
"commendable on the part of the Bank . I think
this is the utmost that
"commerely as regards Sundays and public holi- days but even as regards an intervening pected" can be expected "
"entails"
261
9.7 2
169
" entail"
"shifted."
261
97 7 170
" shifted."
" employers "
261
9.7 8
171
11.2 II
" employees"
" even working"
263
172
"even on working"
"Saturdays ;"
173 263 112 14 "Saturdays," 174 264 11.8 5 " limit of the hour " " limit of one hour ,"
"Thereafter"
175 264 11.8 7 "Thereafter," 176 264 11.8 8 " is no much" . " is not much " .
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
276
Page No. Para . No. Line No. Sl . No. of the Gazette
I
2
3
4
177
265
11.9 19
[PART I- SEC . J ]
Correction Error
6
5
"industrial disputes"
" industrial dispute"
266
"whose work is on"
"whose work on "
178
11-14 I
266
179
1116 4
" they do ,"
"they do"
-180
266
11-16 13
"such an option"
"such and option "
181
267
11 19 13
" it held : "
" itheld;"
182
267
" therewith " "
"therewith,"
11.19 14
183
267
" this decision . "
" this decision
11.19 15
267
184
11.19 19
"and that they should get
"and they will get
overtime"
overtime"
185
267
" overtime allowance in
" overtime allowance ,
11 19 22
this Award"
this Award"
-186
12.2 16
267
" Class III who . "
268
187
12.4 3
"Class III who, "
"Probationers and
"Probationers nd
temporary"
temporary"
188
268
12.5 I
" banks' rcference ."
268
189
12.7 I
" banks' reference ,"
"circumstance"
" circumstances"
268
190
"Commission"
12.7 5 "Commission,"
191 269 12.8 10 " late" " later"
192 269 13.1 31 " 14 : 5 " " 14-5"
193 270 13.3 2 "point" "points"
194 270 13.4 5 " ( 1958 S.C.R. 499 , 1958 "
"1958 S.C.R. 499 , ( 1958 "
195
270
13.4 24
" [ 1964 ( 2 ) S.C.R. 809 "
"[1964 (2 ) S.C.R. 807 "
196 270 13.6 5 "Case" "Cases"
197 270 13.6 7 "Disposed"
"Disposd"
198
271
13.9 3
" enquiries it "
"enquiries is"
" Court vide"
199
271
13-9 6
200
271
13.9 15
"Court ( vide"
" stages ."
201
271
13-10 22
"stages;"
"47) vide"
202
"47) , vide"
"matters "
272 13.12 15
203
273
14 3 4
"matter"
"employees"
" employee"
" out"
204
273
15.1 8
"but"
"Constitution "
205 275 15-8 4 "Constitution , " 206 276 15.10 I
" wo kmen - employees "
"workmen - employees "
" ' Earned' leave"
207 276 15-11 6/7 " "Earned leave' " 208 276 15.12 3 " rules" "rules ." 209 276 15 12 12
"occasions ordinary "
210
" occasions of ordinary "
" leave on for "
278 15.22 18 " leave for"
211 278 15-23 3 "aobve" "above"
212 278 15.26 4
" on this point . "
"on this point: "
" au horities"
213 279 15.29 3 " authorities " 214 280 "twenty two"
"eventy- two'
15.31 3
"whle"
280
215
15.32 3
-280
"while"
"commences ."
15.32 19
16-1 10
"commences ,"
"palce"
280
217
"place" [PART I- SEC . I ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
277
Correction Sl . No.
Para . No.
Line No.
Page No. ofthe Gazette
I
2
6
3
5
4
218
281
I
16.2
"matter"
" matter,"
281
219
16.2
II
" ramily"
"family"
220
281
"Government "
"Government," 16.4
5
221
282
8 " unfare"
16.6
" unfair"
282
16.8
"dependent "
5
"dependant
282
2 " travels"
223
" travel"
16.9
I
283
224
17. I
"Regulation 1958 "
"Regulations , 1948"
6
284
225
"that the wages " .
"that wages"
17.3
226 284 17.4 13 "meaical" " medical" 227 285 17.8 10/11 "however" "however," 228 285 17-8 II
" out -patients "
"out-patients ."
286
6 "his"
"this"
229
17 13
230
287 17.14
'dependent"
"dependant"
231 288 18-3 2 " case," "case" 232 288 18.3 6 " 435" " 455 "
18 " relavant"
" relevant"
288
233
18.3
288
"as"
"has"
18-5
3
234
" he Bank"
" the Bank "
288
18.5
235
4
" is business "
" its business" 288
236
18.5
5
288
18-6
2 " lately"
"latterly"
237
II
" a quasi - Governmental "
" aquasi - Governmental "
289 18.7
238
"bave"
"Ieave"
2
290
18.10
239
2
"Provident Funds "
" Provident Fund "
291
19.7
240
12
"apposite"
"opposite"
19.9
292
241
"while"
"which"
4
292
19.10
242
19.12
292
243
"sufficient if the employee"
" sufficient that the
employee"
8
" S.C.R. 523 "
" S.C.R. 23 "
19.20
296
244
"Allowances," 20-2
"Allowances ."
297
14
245
"should . "
20-2
"should,"
4
298
246
20.2
20
298
247
" Hill and Fuel
Allowances"
"Hill and Fuel Allowances , Provident Fund and Gratuity" THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY [PART I- SEC . 1 ]
278
Error
Correction S1 . No.
Para . No ,
Line No.
Page No. ofthe Gazette
2
I
6
3
4
5
APPENDIX ' A '
248
"em loyed"
299
"employed"
Item (ii)(b)
249
" ifany "
299
"ifany,"
Item (iii)
" of likely"
" orlikely"
250
299 Item (v)
APPENDIX ' B '
I
"meangement"
251
301 Ist para .
"management"
2
"pursuant"
252
"pursuancen"
301 2nd paга .
" 486 "
9
"466 "
253
301
"person"
254
5
4th Para .
301
"persons"
APPENDIX ' C '
PART I
302
255
(i) In Kanpur, under the colunın " Family Size ' against the Income Range of Rs . 200-300 for " 5.9 " substitute " 5.8" ,
256
303
(ii) After Nagpur , for " Aipur " substitute " Jaipur "
PART II
2
257
303
"Rs . 300-4750 " .
"Rs . 300-750" .
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY
[PART I- SEC . 1]
279
Error
Correction
Line No.
Page No. Para No.
Sl. No. ofthe Gazette
6 2
5
3
4
APPENDIX 'D'
258
In Note No. 2 of Part III of the Appendix for the words " allowance is admissible", substitute the words "Allowance as admissible".
P. M. NAYAK , Addl . Secy .
PRINTED PRESS , BY THE GENERAL MANAGER , GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANAGER OF PUBLICATIONS , DELHI , 1968