REGISTERED No. D. (D.N.)—73
The Gazette of India PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 51] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 S e p a r a te paging to given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a s e p a r a te compilation PART II—Section 3—Sub section (ii)
Statutory Orders and Notifications issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (other than the Ministry of Defence)
(4313)
1042 GI/82—1
4314 THE GAZETTE OF INDIADECEMBER : 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(iQ ]MINISTRY OP FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
Now Delhi, the 7th July, 1982
INCOME TAX
SO. 4172.—It ij hereby notified for general information that tho institution mentioned below ha§ been approved by Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, the prei- cribed authority for the purpose* of clause (ii) of sub- section (1) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with Rule 6 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 under the category "Association" in the "area of other natural and applied scieenfa, subject to the following conditions :—
(i) That the Krishnamurti Foundation India, Madras -will maintain a separate account of the turns receiv- ed by it for scientific research in the field of natural and applied sciences and solely apply them for research in Centre far Application of Micro procei- sorn as outlined in their letter No. 11/2/81-KFI dated 13-3-1982,
fii) That the laid Foundation will furnish annual returns of its scientific research activities to the Prescribed Authority for every financial year in such form as may be laid down and Intimated to them for this purpose by 30th April each year.
(iii) That the said Foundation will submit to the Pres- cribed Authority by 30th June each year a copy each of their audited annual accounts showing their total income and expenditure and balance sheet showing its assets liabilities with a copy of each of these documents to the concerned Commissioner of Income-tax.
INSTITUTION
Krishnamurti Foundation India, Madras.
This notification is effective for • period of two years from 8-6-82 to 7-6-84,
INo. 4788CF- No. 2O3|169|8O-ITA(II)]
M. O. C. GOYAL, Under Secy.
New Delhi, the 21st September, 1982
(INCOME-TAX)
S.O. 4173.—In exercise of the power* conferred by "ub- •ection (2)(b) of Section 80-G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies "Shii Martand Deo Stnsthan, Jejuri" to be a place of public wor- •hip of renown throughout the State of Maharashtra.
(No. 4920/F. No, 176/48|82-JT(AI)] New Delhi the 22nd September, 1982
INCOME-TAX
S.O. 4174.—In exercise of the powers confcried by sub- jection (2)(b) of Section 80-G of the Income-tax Act, 196] (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies "Sri I akshmi Venkateswarauwamy Temple, Devuni-Cuddapnh" to be a place of public workship of rcmown throughout the State of Andhra Pradesh.
2. This notification nriall have effect from th" period covered by Asseisment Year 1981-82 to 1985-86.
[No. 49211F. No. 176|43|81-IT(AI)]
(INCOME-TAX}
S.O. 4175.—In exercise of the poweri conferred by sub- section (2)(b) of Section 80-G of the Income-tax Act. 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies "Aru- Imigu Kasiviswanathaswamy Thinikoil, Tenkisi, Tirunelveli Distt, (Tamil Nadu)" to be a place of public workship of r e n o^ throughout the State of Tamil Nndu.
{No. 4922|F. No. 176|26I82-IT(AI)]
4313CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
New Delhi, the 7th July, 19R2
(INCOME-TAX)
S. O. 4176 . -In exercise of the powers conferred by "ub- section (1) of Section 121 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendment to its Notification No. 679 dated 20-7-74 as amended from time io time.
The existing entries against Sl. No. 5-L shall be substituted
as follows:—
Headquarters Jurisdiction Commissioner of Income Tax
Bombay
5-L (Investigation)
Bombay City.
1. Survey Circlc-1. 2, Survey Circle-II. 3. Aiscssmcnt Circle
XI.
4. Assessment Circle
XII.
This notification ihall take effect from 12th July, J982
[No. 4786 /F. No. 185/123/82—IT(AI)] MILAP JAIN, Under Secy.
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE; OJBce of the1 Deputy Chief Controller of Import* & Exports
CANCELLATION ORDER
Jaipur, the 25th August, 19S2
S.O. 4177.—M/S. Goel Cold Kollin* Mill, A-95tB), Industrial Area, Bhiwadi, Diatt. : Alwar (Raj.), were granted Import licence No. P|S|1865035|C|XX]78|8O dated 12-3-1981 for Rs. 5,00,000 only for imporr of All Sccondi/ Second GoodslDefectivelQuittingslCircles in|Uncoated Condi- tion of All jjnide of Carbon Steel Plates|Shects]Stripg coili m Any FormJShape of Policy Book for AM 81 required foi the manufacture of Auricultmc Implements.
Tho applicant has filed CJI affidavit as required under para 358 of Hand Book of Import Export Procedure 1982-83 wheicin they have stated that original Exchange Puiposti Copy of Licence No. P/S/1865035 dated 12-3-1981 for R". 5,00,000 only foi AM 81 period has been misplaced/ lost without having registered with any Cu*tom" House and utilised paitly for KB. Nil.
I am satisfied that the original Exchange Purpose Copy
of the said licence has been lost/rnisijlacod.
In exercise* of the power* conferred on m" under gection 9(cc) of Import Trade Control order, 1955 dated 7th Dec. 1955 as amended upto date the Exchange Purpose Copy of tht Licence No. P/S/l 865035 dated 12-3-1982 for Rs. .1,00,000 only is hereby cancelled.
The applicant it now bei"s isiued duplicate Excbflnie Purpose Copy of Import Licence No. P/S/1865035 dated 12-3-1982 for the CIF value of Re. 5,00,000 only in HCCOT- dancc with the provision of para 332 to 354 of Hand Book of Import Export Procedures 1982-83.
(F. No. SSI/N/10|AM. 81|Sec. I|Raj!DCCl&E]
4316 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA- : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY
CANCELLATION ORDER
S.O. 4178.—M/s. J. G. Engineering & Metal Industries, Plot No. A95 (A) Industrial Area, Bhiwadi-Alwar (Raj.) were granted Import Licence No. P/S/1865036|C|XXI78|Oi 80 dated 12-3-1981, for Rs, 5,00,000 only for import of All seconds | Second goods|Defectives|Quttings|Cir<;clcs| un-coated condition of all grades of Carbon Steel plates/ Sheets/Strips Coils in any form/Shape of Policy Book for AM 81 required for the manutacture of Agriculture Imple- ments.
The applicant has filed an affidavit as required under para 332 of Hand Book of Import Export Procedure 19S2-83, wherein they have stated that original Exchange purpose* copy of Licence No. P/S/1865036 dated 12-3-1981 for Rs. 5,00,000 only for AM 81 period has been misplaced/ lost without having been registered with any Customs House and utilised partly for Rj, Nil.
I am satisfied that the original Exchange Purpose Copy of the said licence has been lost/misplaced.
In exercise of tho power i conferred on me under section JJ(cc) of Import Trade Control Order 1955 dated 7th Dec, 1955 as amended upto date, the Exchange Purpose Copy of the licence No. P/S/1865036 dated 12-3-1981 for Rs. 5,00,000 1" hereby cancelled.
The applicant i" now being issued duplicate Exchange Purpose Copy of Import Licence No. P/S/1865036 dated I2-3-19S1 for the OIF value of Rs. 5,00,000 only in ac- cordance with the provision of para 352 to 354 of Hand Book of Import-Exprt JTocedure 1982-83.
{F. No. SSI/N/lllAM. 81|Sec. I|DCCI&E|RAJ}
S. K. DUTTA, Dy. Chief Controller of Import* & Exsorti (Department of Industrial Development)
New Delhi, the 10th November, 1982
S.O. 4179.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sec- tion 152 of the Patents Act, 1970 (39 of 1970), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Industry and Civil Supplies (Department of Industrial Development) S.O. No. 2819, dated the 29th luly, 1975, published in the Gazette o* India, Pjkt It Section 3 Sub-section (ii), dated tho 30th August, 1975 at pages 3160 to 3162; namely :—
In the said notification, under the heading "2. Assam"— after tho existing entriei relating to Shillong, ths following shall be inserted, namely :—
"-do- The Vice Chancellor, North Eastern Hill Univer- sity, Lower Lachaumiere, ShiUong, Aisam-793001.
[File No. 8(13)/81-PP&C?
S.O. 4180.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sec- tion 152 of the Patents Act, 1970 (30 of 1970), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Industry and Civil Supplies, (Department of Industrial Development) S. O. No. 2819. dated the 29th Inly 1975 published in the Gazette of India, Part II Sec- tion 3 Sub-section (ii) dated the 30th August, 1975 at page* 3160 to 3162 ; namely :—
In the said notification, under the heading "8 Kerala" after the existing entries relating to Trivandrum, the following shall' be inserted, namely :—
"Cochin.-—University Librarian, Cochin University Lib- rary, Cochjn-682022."
[File No. 8(13)/81-PP&CJ
P. R. CHANDRAN, Dy. Secy.
4317MINISTRY OF CIVIL SUPPLIES
INDIAN STANDARDS INSTITUTION
New Delhi, the 1980-11-17
S. O. 4181.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (4) of regulation 14 of the Indian Standards Institution (Cortification Maiks) Regulations 1955 as amended from tima to time, the Indian Standards Institution hereby nntiSes that LiceiQe N j. CM/L-0749765" particular of which are given below has been cancelled with effect from 82-07-01 at the request of the licensee :
SCHEDULE
and Date Name and Address of the
by the Relevant
Indian Standards
Article/Process Covered Licence Cancelled
Licenses
Sl. Liconce No. No.
3
2
4
5 1
Interlock Knitted Cottan V
1. CM/L-0749765
M/s.
ests IS: 4965 (Part
cuion fjr cotton vests
ID—1975 Sped fi Iit.-rb;'c kiittc d Part II Vests
Type : RN an 1 RN3 Site : 75 to 100 cm Gauge : 20 and 24
Chitralayi Banian Co., 55-A, Dharapiu-im R j i i, Tlrupur-638604 (Tamil Nadu)
ml
(First Revisic
[CMD/55 : 0749765)
4318 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)JNew Delhi, the-198211-23
S.O. 4182. —In pursuance of sub-regulation (4) of regulation 14 of the Indian Standards Institution (Certi5a,ition Marks) Regulations 1955 as amended from timo to tirue. the Indian Standards Institution hereby notifies that Licence No. CM/L-0767464 par- ticulars of whioh are given in the Schedule b"low has been oancelled with effect from 1982-02-01 as th" firm h not interested to operate th" lioonce.
SCHEDULE
1. Licenc* No. and Dal
Article/Process Covered by
,o Nnme & Address of the Licensee
tho Relevant Tndian Standards s
0.
Licence Cancelled
N
1
2
3
4
5
CM/L-0767464
M/g. Bangalore Wire Rod Mill,
1. 19
'79-03-30
(A unit of Transport Corp/i of
Carbon steol bars for forgings
IS : 1875-1978 SpeciScatnn for carbon steel billets, bli3oms> slabi and bars for forging).
(Fourth Revision) Indian Ltd)., Whitefield Road, Mahadevapura P.O., Bangalore-560048
[CMP/55 : 0767464]
NeWDolhi, the 198M1-24
S.O. 4183—In partial modification of the Miiistry of Civil Supplies (Indian Standards Institution) njtification number S.O 1499 dated 1981-04-24, published in the Gazette of India, Part—n. Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 1981-05-16, the Indian Standards Institution, hereby notifies that the standard marks fur pressure regulators and manual blow pipes for cutting and welding have been revised. The revised designs of the standard Marks together with the title of the relevant Indian Standards and verbal description of tho designs arc given in the following Schedule.
These Standard Marks, for the purpose of the Indian Standards Institution (CertiSaation Muk") Act, 1952 and the Rules "nd Regulations framed thereunder, shall come into force with offect from 19S0-12-16:
4319SCHEDULE
Verbal Description of tho dosija
No. and Title of tho Relevant
Product/Class of froduct of the Standard Mark
Indian Standard
Sl. Desien of the Standard No. Mark
3
1 2
1. IS : 6901
Pressure regulators for gas cy- linders used to welding, cutt- ing
5
4
IS : 6901 — 1973Speciflcation for pressure regulator* for gas cylinder used in welding, cutting and reMed processes
2. IS : 7653
Manual blow pipes for welding
and cutting
Tho monogram of the Indian Standards Institution, consist- ing of letteri *JSI\ drat"n im the exact stylo and relativ* proportion* ** indicated in Col. (2); the number of the Indian Standard being super eribed on the top tide of the monogram ai indicated in the design.
IS : 7653—1975 Specification for manual blowpipes for welding and cutting
The monogram of the India Standards Institution, consist ing of letters 'ISP drawn in the exact style and relative proportions as indicated is Col (2); the number of the Indian Standard being supers- cribed on the top side of the monogram as indicated In the dciiffn.
[No. CMD/13 : 9]
S.O.41*4—Tn partial modification of the then Ministry of Commerce aad Civil Supplier (Dep"rtmant of Civil Supplies) flndiat Standards Institution) notification number S.O. 1155 dated 1980-04-09 published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section-3, Sub- section (ii) dated 1980-04-26, the Indian Standards Institution, hereby, notifies that the dwign of the Standard Mark for orseni c"l copper rods for boiler stay bolts and rivets has bean reviled. Tho revised design of the Standard Mirk together with the title of the relevant Indian Standard and verbal description of the design a given in tho following Schedule :
This Standard Mark for the purposes of the Indian Stanlards Imtitutinn (Cei'tifkition Mirks) Art, 1952 and th" Rules and
Regulations framed thereunder, shall come into force with effaet from 1982-02-01 :
4320 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)lSCHEDULE
Design of the Standard ProAuit/cIass of Product
No. & Title of ttii Relevant Vcb.il Desciiption of the Design
Mark
Sl. No.
Indian Standard
of the Standard Mark
2
3
4
5
: 288-Sl
1. IS
Arsenical cjpptrf r o il for bjiler
stay bolts and rivets
IS : 233-1931 Spocifii-ubn for arscnioal coppar rods TOT bai- ler stay bolt', aid rivats (second revision)
D
i
Th" nmnograrn of ths IndUi Staii'ljrili Institution, comist_ in3 of Ijttais 'ISV drawn in" tho e t ut style and relative proportions as Indicated In d\. (2); the number of the Indian Stan lard, iloigwith its year, beitvj s.ipsricribti on tho top si lo oF tti-j mJnogram as iadicatod in the deslsn.
[No. CMP/13 : b>J
S O. 4185 •—In supersossion of the then Ministry of Cornraerce and Civil Supplies (Department of Civil Supplied) (Indian
Standard's Ir*titution) notification number S.O. 3830 datod 1979-11-08 published In the Gazotte of India, Part II, Ssction-3, Sub- - (ii) dated 1979-12-01, the Indian Standards Institution, hereby, notlnos that the design of the Standard Mark for alumino- f rric has been revised. Tho revised design of the Standard Mark together with the title of the relevant Indian Standard and verbal description of the design is given in the following Schedule.
This Standard Mark for the purposes of tho Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Act, 19J2 and the Rule* and
u^oulationi framed thcreund"r, shall come into fore* with effect from 1981-06-01 :
*^
THE SCHEDULE
Verbal Description of tne Design Product/ Class of Product
Design of the Standard
of the Standard Mark
No. & Title of tho Relevant Indian Standard
Sl. No.
5
3
4 ,
%
T~
Aluraino-forrfc
: 299—80
IS : 299—1980 Specification for ftlumino-ferrto * (third revision)
4^11042 G 1/82—2
4322 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4323 4324 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER IS, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART I I — S E C. 3(ii)]S,O . 4186 -—In pursuance of sub rule (2) of Rule 3 and sub-regulations (2) ami (3) of regulation 3 of the Indian Standards Ins titution (Certification Marks) Rules and Regulations, 1955, the Indian Stamlmk Li^itUtna liereby njtiftes that the Indian SUn- i1ar Ksi particulars of which arc given in the Schedule hereto annexed, have boon estabUjhcl on 1980-05-31 :
'
SCHEDULE
Romajks, if atiy No. and Title of the Indian Standards Established
Sl. No
No. aud Title of the Indian Standard or Standards, if any, superseded by the new Indian Standard ,
(2)
0)
(4) (1)
1.
13 : 74--i 96ft Methods of sampling and test for drying oils for paints (first revision)
jS ; 74—1979 Method* of sampling and test for drying oils fur paints (second revision)
4325(2)
{{^{{FOOTNOTE (1)}}}}
(4)
O)
—
IS : 101—1962 Specific itio,i for retdy mho I paint, brushing, zinc chrome, priming (revised)
IS : 714 — 1962 Specification for c ittun
reinforcing tape for aircraft
(revised)
4v
IS : 808—1964 Specification for railed steel beam, channel and angle section1", (revised)
IS : 104—1979 Specification for ready mixed paint, brushing, zinc chrome, priming (second revision) IS : 714—1979 Specification for cotton reinforcing tape aerospace purposes) (second, revision) I S: 808 (P.irt 111)—1979 Dimensions for hotrolled steel beim, channel and an"1e sections : Pan III Channel. MC and MCP scries. (second revision)
5.
IS : 1064—1961 Specification for paper
—
sizes (revised)
IS : 1109—1968 Specification for borax
6.
--
(first revision)
7.
IS : 1376—1968 Specification for cotton sewinc thread for aeronautical purposes (fiist revision)
8.
9.
TS : 165L—1970 Spe:idc
tubular positive plates) (ftist re/islon)
IS : 1064—1980 Specification foi paper sizes (second icvision) IS : 1109—1980 Specification for boras (second revision) IS : 1376-1979 Specification for cottwi sewing threads for aerosp.tt.-i, purposes (second revision) IS : 1448 (P : 93) -1979 Methods of test foi petroleum and its products : P : 93 Needle penetration of petroleum wnxea IS : 1651—1979 Specification for sta- tionary cells and batteries, lead-acid type (with tubular positive plales) (second revision)
LS : 1352-1973 Rollins and cutting
10.
t->lerj,i;o> fjr hjt-otljl >to)l proiujts
(second revision)
IS : 1852—1979 Rolling and cutting ! tolerances for hot-roUedsteel product 5 (third revision)
11. I S: 2032 (Part XXIll)—1978 Graplii;U symbols used, in electrotechuology : Part XXIII Instrument-; for process measure- ment and control
12.
IS : 2279 — 1963 Specification for nne silver bar, sheet, wire, granules and token
(LAQDI or MOHUR)
JS ; 2279—1980 Specification for fine silver bar, sheet, wlro, granules and token (first levision)
;
IS : 5320—1969 Specification for fine silver
ingot.
13. IS : 2560—1979 Specification for rubber- IS: 2560-1963 SpociBcation. for rubb^r- —•
baVcd adhesives for tubes, non-curing ba.se Aih^si^i) f >t tvrj? TI fJbss n n-
(fiist revision) curing
14 . IS : 2562—1979 Specification lot rubber- IS : 2562—1963 Specification for rubbar-
based adhesives for tyres an tubes, curing basel adhesive for tyres and tubas, caring
(first revision)
15. IS : 2717—1964 Glossary of teems used in
vitrsjus onamolware industry
IS : 2717 -1979 Glossary of terms relat- ing to vitreous enamelwurc and ceramic metal systems (flrst revision)
16.
>ns T'i: 33W(i?vt f/So;. 2) HD7 D m; no is >i fi>r porcelain transformer bushings : Part I •3- uri to 1.1 ttV bushings: Section 2 Mutal
: parts
IS : 3347 (Part I,Sec. 2) 1979—DimensK for procolain transformer bushing fu use in normal and lightly by polluted alii] phcres : Part 1 up to and including 1 kV Section 2 Metal parts (fitbt revision)
S : 3347 (Part II/Sec 2) -4967 Dintenjions
17.
for porcelain transformer bushing : Part 11 3.6 kV bu^hin&j. Section 2 Motal parts
IS : 3347 (Part ll/Sec 2)—1979 Dimcn- t 'ions for porcelain trjnstormoi bushing for use iii normal and lightly polluted atmospheres : Part II 3.6 kV bushings : Section 2 Metal parts (first revision)
4326 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](1
(4) ) (2)
0)
- IS : 3607—1966 Specification for magnesite
!. IS : 3607—1979"Specification for magw
—
18
for chemical industries
site for chemical industry (first revision)
IS : 3620—1966 Specification for laterite
i. IS : 3620—1979 Specification for laterite
IS
stone block for masonry
—
stone block for masonry (first revision)
IS : 4491—1968 Specification for steel cast-
2C
ings of high magnetic permeability
I. Is : 4491—1979 Specification for steel castings of high magnetic permeability (first revision)
21
. IS : 4651. (Part IV)—1979 Code of prac- tice for planning and design of ports and harbours : Part IV General design consi-
IS : 4651 (Part IV)—1969 Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours : Part IV Sheet pile retaining walls
derations
(first revision) IS : 4659—1980 Specification for wire IS : 4659—1968 Specification for wire reel
22
for inland vessels
' rope reel for inland vessels
(first revision) IS : 4738—1980 Specification for plaster IS : 4738—1968 Specification for plaster of
23
paris bandage
IS : 4903—1968 Guide for treatment of
24
effluents of canesugar industry
' of paris bandage (first revision) IS • 4903—1979 Guide for treatment and " dtepOsal of effluents of cane sugar industry
IS : 5405—1969 Specification for sanitary
25
towels
IS : 5733—1969 Grafts of apples
26
27,
(first revision) jg : 5405—1980 Specification for sanitary napkins (first revision) Vi • 5733 19^9 Code for production of grafts of apples (•first revision) IS • 7022 (Part II)—1979 Glossary of ' terms relating to water, sewage and indus-
trial effluents Part II
28.
' IS • 7290—1979 Recommendations tor use of polyethylene film for waterproofing
IS :7290—1973 Recommendation to* us" of polyethylene film for waterproofing of roofs
.
29.
of roofs (first revision) is • 8252 (Part IV)—1980 Environmemal tests for aircraft equipment : Part IV Ice formation ]S • 8252 (Part XVI)—1979 Environmen-
30.
tal tests for aircraft equipment : Part XVI
Shock
31.
IS : 8886 (Part IV)—1980 Specification for ship's ordinary rectangular windows Part IV Details of position of lugs for hinges and swing bolts and securing holes on the frame
32.
IS : 8889 (Part V)—1980 Specification for ships* ordinary rectangular windows Part V Details of frame, inward opening, side hinged, heavy type bolted windows
33.
IS : 8886 (Part VI)—1980 Specification for ships* ordinary rectangular windows Part VI Details of frame, inward opening, side hinged, light type bolted windows
34.
IS : 8886 (Part VII)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: Part VII Deta:ls of frame, inward opening, side hinged heavy and light type welded
windows
4327 ) (2) (3) (4) 35i. IS : 8886 (Part VIII)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangulai windows: Part VIII Details of frame, inward opening, top hinged, heavy type bolted windows
36
-—.
37.
. IS : 8886 (Part IX)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows : Part IX Details of frame, inward opening, top hinged, light type bolted windows IS : 8886 (Part X)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: Part X Details of frame, inward opening, top hinged, heavy and light type welded windows
38.
—"
IS : 8886 (Part XI)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: Part XI Details of frame, non-opening heavy type bolted windows
39. IS : 8886 (Part XII)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: Part XII Details of frame, non-opening, light type bolted windows
40.
„
IS : 8886 (Part XIII)—1980'Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: Part XIII Details of frame, non-opening heavy type welded windows
41. IS : 8886 (Part XV)—1980 Specification for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: Part XV Details of frame, outward opening, side hinged, heavy type bolted windows
i
tS : 8886 (Part XV0—1980 Spscification 42.1 for ships' ordinary rectangular windows: ) Part XVI DetaUs of frame, outward opening, side hinged light type bolted windows
[S : 8886 (Part XVHI)—1980 Specifica- 43.1 ion for ships' ordinary rectangular t vindows: Part XVIII Details of glass lotder, inward opening, side hinged, 1 leavy and light type bolted and welded r vindows \ 44.1 i J
0
S : 8886 (Part XIX)—1980 Specification or ships' ordinary rectangular windows: 'art XIX Details of glass holder, outward .pening, side hinged, heavy and light type lotted and welded windows
t 45.1 f( F h
S : 8886 (Part XX)—1980 Specification or ships' ordinary rectangular windows : 'art XX Details of glass holder, top inged, heavy and light type bolted and 'elded windows
3 : 8886 (Part XXID—1980 Specification >r ships' ordinary rectangular windows: art XXII Details of swing bolts and ing nuts
46.15 f< P w
•
—_
47. IS
C(
>: 9136—1978 Specification for calcium >mplex grease
": 9214—1979 Method of determination F modulus of subgrade reaction (fc-vahie)
48. IE o!
^ ^ ~Hl ? ^T TJ lO FiN D IA : DECEMBER IS, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART I I - S E C. 3(ii)1 1 2 3 4 of soils in fiold ...49.
IS : 2208—1962 Speciflcatm for HRC
c/artriige fuse links upto 630 V
IS : 9224 (Part 11)—1979 SpeciiL-ation for low voltage fuses : Part 11 Supple- mentary I equipments fur fuses with high breaking capacity for industrial applica- tion
50.
—
--
51.
—
52.
—
53.
—
—
54.
—•
—
55.
—•
56.
—
—
57.
—•
58.
59.
—•
—
60.
61.
62.
63.
IS : 9243 (Part IT)—1979 Methods of test for wrisi watches : Part II Shock-resistant IS : 9259—1979 Specification for liquid limit apparatus for soils IS : 9328—1979 Glossary of torms relating to confectionery industry IS ; 9350—1980 Specification for thermal insulating cement (type 950) IS : 9365—19S0 Specification for fc'iitro- thion granules IS : 9381-1979 Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials : Determina- tion of fraass breaking point of bitumen IS : 9384—1979 Specification for conso- lidated data plate for freight containers IS .- 9386—1979 Methods for chemical analysis of rock phosphate IS : 9393—1979 Code of manufactuiine worsted, semiworsted and woollen yarns and tolerances IS : 9400—1980 Guide for the preparation of bibliographic description sheet for technical reports IS : 9405—1980 Method of test for con- veyor belt fasteners IS : 9427—1980 Code of practice for operation and maintenance of deionizing columns IS ". 9455—1980 Classification of musco- vltc mica blocks, thins and films based on electrical properties IS : 9456—1980 Code of practice for design and construction of conical and hyperbolic parabololdal types of shell foundations
Copies of these Indian Standards are available for sale with ttisflndlan Staidards Institution, Manak B'jawan, 9 Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, Now Delhl-ll0002 and also from its branch offices at Ahmodabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubancshwar, Bombay, Calcutta Chandigarh, Ilydimbid, J.uiut, Ita-uu , Mi.i/as, Patm and Trlvandrutn.
INo. CMD/13-.2]
4329New Delhi, ! 982-10-1 Jl
S.O. 4187.—Tn pursuance of SLil>rc8ulatini>(4) of Regulation 14 of the Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks), Regulations 1W^ a". anictidcd from time tu time, the Inimn Staail.'tdj Tn-.tit'jt'm-i hsreby notiies that licence NJ- 1000712 particulars -of which 4i e given ui the schedule helow his beea excelled with effect from Thirty first January, One thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty two.
SCHFDUIJ:
Liue.icc Nil. & D^*e N i.-nc & Address of the licensee
Rclovant IndUn Standard Sl. No.
Articlo/Proce^s Covered by the licence cancelled
M/s. Rallii India Lid., Btiapar
1. CM/L-1000712
Fenitrothion EC (Repacking)
81-0l>-30
IS:52S1—1980 Speciijition for Fonitrothion Emulsifiable Con- centrates (First Revision) V inil, Thanc-OeUpur Roaii, Thane, Bombflj (Maharashtra! (Office ' KorrurAvl-ul'> ne ll Nanibur R.S.)
[CMD/55 : 1000711]
New Delhi, 82-10-14
S.O. 4138.—In pursuance of Sub-regulation (4) of Regulation 14 of tho fnAiin SU.idir h Inititafon (Certinjitoa Marks), Regula- tions 1955 as amended from time to time, the Indian Standards Ittstitutb.i hereby notilei that the Licence No. CM/L-5798* particulais of which are given below lias been .cancelled with etfect from 82-03-16 at the request of tho Uceasoa.
SCHEDULfl
Nemo & Address of the Licensee Ari.icle/Procc^5 Covcie I by the Relevant Indian Standards Licence No. and Date
Licensee Cancelled
Sl. No.
3
4
5 1
Biscuits of the following varieties
1.
IS : 1011-1981 Specification .for biscuits (second revision) CM/L-5796- 1977-01-11
Glucose, Orange cream, Marie, Masala and Bouncer Salted
M/s Amber Foods, 2-3-761, Amberpet, Hydcrabid-500013 (A.r.)
•New licence No. CM/L-0579665
[CMD/55 : 0579665] A.P. BANERJI, Additional Director General
1042 GI/82- 3
4330 THE GAZETTE OF JNDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health)
N(.w DJhi, the 30A November, 1981
5.3. M39. -Wijro •$ ii purtu .ace of chuse (a) of section 3 of the D ntMs Act, 1948 (Act 16 of 1948) Dr. Y. N. S-iXona, Lc ;tuier, C ilege if D itistry, In 'nre, Ins been elected to be a member f the Do'it 1 C 'unril of l i d i. by the members of tho Ciu'icilof Uiiv<_rsity of Indorc in ph.ee of Dr. A.K. Dass with effect from 29-3-1982.
N w, tr-cref re, in pursuance of section 3 of the said Act, th.; Coitr.l G v, rnmeU hereby m.kcs the following further amendments in the notiffc tion of the GovLrnment of In 'ia in the late Ministry of Health No. 10-10/48-MI, dc.ted the ]2th April, 1949, .s rcpublished by the notification of th< Govern- in it of [ i lh i'l the Mi rstry of H.Llth and Family Welfare (D i r t ra it i rH .lth) N J. S.O. 533, d .ted tht 9th Febru-ry, 1978, m.mJy :—
In the said notification, under the h rding "Elected under cl .use ( '.) of section 3", For scri 'A number 12 ind the entries rel iting thereto, the following sh^.ll be substituted, n m.ly :—
"12. Dr. Y.N. S.xoai, ladJre University 29-3-82".
Lecturer, ColLgc of Dcntistiy, Ini'.ore.
[N->. V. 12013/4/82-PMS]
S.P.Pathak, Under Secy.
ORDER
New Delhi ,the 24th November, 1982
S.O. 4190,—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health No V. 11016/34/77- MPI'/M.E. (Policy) dated the 16th lune, 1978, the Central Covet nment has directed that the medical qualification, M.B.B.S. (University of New South Wales) Australia, shall be recognised medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956);
And •whsreas Dr. (Mrs.) Claiic Mac Mahon, who possesses the bflid qualification is for ibe timc-beinR attached to the Delhi Commonwealth Women's Association, New Delhi for the purposes of chaiilablc work.
Now, therefore, in pup-rance of clause (c) of the proviso to sub-vrclion (1) of sfction 14 of the s.iid Act. !he Central Oovernnocnt hereby specifics —
(i) a period upto 30th Sentmber, 1983 or
(ii) tht- period during which Dr. (Mrs.) Claric Mac Mnhon attached to the said Delhi Commonwealth Women's Associalion, Nevv Delhi whichever is shmter, us the periicl tj which the medical practice by the aforesaid doctor shall be limited.
INo. V. 11016/8/82-MF.(PoHcy)] P C. JAIN, Under Secy,
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 1982
S.O. 4191.—In exercise of the power conferred by the proviio to arlide 309 ol the Constitution, the President here- by makes the following rirl"s further to amend the All India Instituic of Hygiene and Public Health, Calcutta (Group C and D posts) Recruitment Rules, 1959, namely :
1. (1) These rules may be cal'ed the All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Calcutta (Group C and D post,) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1982.
4331(2) They sjhall come mlo fotce on the date of their
publication in tho Official Gazstte.
2. In the All India Institute o£ Hygiene and Public Health,
Calcutta (Group C and D posts) Recruitment Rules, 1959,
(a) in sub ml- (1) of rule 1. the word and letter "and
group D" shall Lc omitted;
(b) in the schedule, serial number 1 to 22 relating to group D posts and the entries relating thereto shall be omitted.
[No. A. 120I8/4/81-G] SHIVDAYAJL, Under Secy.
MINISTRY OF ENERGY
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 1982
(Department of Petroleum)
New Delhi, the 24th November, 1982 S.O. 4192.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (i) of Section 21 uf the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (23 of 1940), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Malay Mitia as Drugs Inspector (Gazetted Group "B") in the scale of pnv of Rs. 650—30—740--35—810—EB— 35—880—40—1000—EB—40—1200 in the Central Drugs Standards Control Organisation for whole of India, on tem- porary basis with effect from the forenoon of 15th October, 1982.
[No. A. 12025/1 /81-D.(DMS&PFA] G. PANCtlAPAKfiSAN, Under Secy.
S-O. 419S.—Whcieas by notification of the Government of India in tiie MuUsiiy oi fcuoicum, Coemicais & fertilizer, (-Department oi f eiroieum) 6.O. 3256 dated 5-11-81 under sub-section (I) ot Section 3 of the Petioleum and Mintrals Pipelines (Acquisition ot Riyht ot User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 ot 1962), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline;
And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub- section (I) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government;
And fuither whereas the Central Government has, after considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to .his notiiication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the cower conferred bv sub-sectidn (1) of the Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said lauds specified in the i,ciiLdule appended to this notifi- cation heieby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further in exercise of power conferred by sub-seclion (4) of that section, the OntrnJ Government directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Ccnlial Government vests on this date of 'he publication of this declaration in the Oil & Nattjril Gas Commission free from encumbrances
SCHEDULE
Pipeline From KLF to GGS VI
St .tc : Guj -ivt Distri*t : Mehsana Yiluk i : K iJi
Survey NS.
Village
Cen- tiare
H;> tare
4
[
2
3
5
Chadasan
232 235 236
25 25 * 20
0 0 0
05 11 01
4332 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART If—SEC. 3(ii)J 4 5 I 3 ~47 0~ 204 the laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil & Natural Gas Commission, Construction a,nd Maintenance Division, Mafoirpura Road, Vadodara (310009). 306 :; so0 0
310
03 H 06
And every person making puch un objection shall also state specifically whether he wishes to be heard m person or Ijy a legal practitioner.
SCH5DUL':
0 0 0
0
0^ 0> 03
60 '0 55 00 50
30J 312 313 350/1
Pipeline from Well No. SWMGto WellNxM^TF S t . t o: Gujarr.t Pijtriet : Bhamch T.lulc1. : Hinsot
[N>. 120 6/31/31-Piod,]
CM-
Are
Village
Survey N ">•
tiarc
t^ro
Rolurt
0 0
55 Id 55S
53 30 S6
SO
10
0 0
18 16
0 0
08 14 0! 07 04 16
29 25
[Nw. Q-12016/52/82-Prcd.]
S.O. 4194.—Whereas it appears to the Cenlrul Govern- ment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from SWMG to MTF in Gujarat State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Giis Commission;
And wheibMtt appears that for the purpose of laying sLich pipeline, it flrjpccessary to acquire the right of user in the land dcscnbed in the sciiedulrfbnexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power* conferred by sub-section (1) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Mineral pipelines (Acquisitioi of Right of User Jn the Land) Act, 1962 (50 of -1962), the Central Government hereby declares it intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Provided that any person interested in the said land may, wjthijr 21 days from the date of this notification, object to
4333S.O. 4195.—Wkcicas it appears to the Central Government that it is nccessai-y in the public interest that for tho truns- port of petroleum from SDL to SON in Gujarat State pipe- on; ihonlJ. be laid by the Oil Si Natural Gas Commission;
And v\hcrcas it appeals that for the purpose of lavinc iuch pipeline, it is necessity to acquire the right oJ i^ci in the land described in t!ic schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in e\erasc of the powers confeirdl bv sub-section (1) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Mine- rals pipelines (Acquisition oi Right of User in the Land) Act. 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquit* the riRht of user therein;
Provided that nnv person interested in the said land may, within 21 days from the date of this notilicition, object to the laying oi the pipeline under the land to the Compe- tent Authonly/ Oil £. Naturtl Gas Commission, Construction and Maintenance Divisiqn, Makarpum Road, Vadodara (390 009).
And cvciy person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practioncr.
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from W e l l Nr SDL t J SDN
St .to : Guj ivat Di tri't : Bro-eh TMuka : Ankle.hwar
Are Village
Block N).
Cen- tiare
Hec- tare
311
10 P.irdi ldns
O'J 07
40 36 54
0 0 0 0 0
10 13 24
310 105 303 3O4A 303
0
207
40 65 70 16
Q\ 39
143
0 0
S3
00 80
0
[Ns. 0-12016/52'82-l'wd.] New Delhi, too 26th, November, 1982
S. O • 4196.—Whereas by the notiflcL.tion of Government of India as shown in the schedule appended hereto and issued under sub section (1) of section 6 of the Petroleum & Minerls pipeline (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act, 1962 the right of user his beoi acquired in the lands speeded in the sche- dule appended thereto for the trinsport of petroleum from d.s SDB to Mjtwin in Ankicshwir oil liold ia Gijarat Stitc.
And whereas the Oil & N itural G.is Commission has termi-
nated the operations referred to in clause (i) of sub section • (1) of section 7 of the said Act on 25-9-81.
Now therefore under Rule 4 of tho Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquistion of Right of User iu Land) Rules, 1963, the • Com- petent Authority hereby notifies the said date as the date of termination of operation to above,
SCHEDULE
Termination of Operation of Pipeline from D. S.SDBtoMotwan
S.O. No.
Villages
Name of Ministry
Date of termina- tion of operation
Ditc of publica- tion in the Gizette of Indiu
Petioleum, Tclvva
356 31-1-S1 25-9-81
Chemicals &
Fertilizer
pst-J. 12016/39/32-Pi-od- II]
4334 ^ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART I I - S E C. 3(ii)j(Department of Coal)
New Delhi, the 25th November, 1982
S.O. 4198.—The notifications issued under section 14(2) of the Coal Bearing Arcus (Acquisition & Development) Act, 1957 vide S. O. 1601 to S,O. 1687 dated 1st May, 1979, published in the Gazette of India on 19lh May, 1979 in favour of Sri Chandra Shekar Singh, Additional District and Session Judge, Ranchi may now he treated to have been issued in favour of Sri Dharampal Sintia, Additional Judicial Commissioner, RaDChi.
[No. 13/4/82-CL1 P. SARKAR, Director S.O. 4197.—Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum, Chemicals & Fortilizer, (Department of Petroleum) S.O. 1666 dated 8-3-82 under sub-section ( lj of Section 3 of the Pclroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acqisition of Right of User in Land,) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Centra) Government declared its intention to acquire the light of. user in the lands ipecificd in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of lay- ing of pipeline;
And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub- Section (I) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Government;
.And further whereas the Central Government has, after considering the said report, decided to acquire the riflht of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of,the power conferred by sub- section (1) of the Section 6 of the said. Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said lands specified ip tbe schedule appended to this notifi- cation hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And finther in exercise of power conferred by sub-section (4) of that section, the Central Government directs that ihc right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in tho Central Government vcsu" on this date of the publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas Commission free from encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from jAAto Jlulora GGS I
State : Gujira District : Mchsana Tuluka : K-.di
Are
Survey No.
Village
Ccn- tiarc
Hec- tare
22
Borisana
00 23 65 10 88
519 514/1 515/1 543 545
0 0 0 0 0
21 16 11 01
[No. 12016/66/81-Prod.] L.M. GOYAL, Director
4335MINISTRY OF ENERGY
(Department of Petroleum)
Now Delhi, the 30th November, 1982
SO- 4J99.— In exercise oF the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Prenhes (Eviction or Unauthorised Occupants) Act. 1971 (40 of 1971), the Ccalral Govern- ment hereby^ appoints the officer mentioned in column (1) of the Table below, bcWg offi-er of a statutory authority, equivalent in rank to a gazetted officer of Government, to be Estate Officer for the purpose-; of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the dutbs imposed on Estate Officer by or under the said Act, in respect of the premises specified in column (2) of the said table; —
TABLE
Designation of tho officer Categories of Public Premises and local limits of jurisdic- tion
(2)
U)
Deputy General Manager (Personnel), Balmcr Lawiie and Company Limited, 2t- Notaji Subhas Ro-id, Calcutta- 700 001.
Premises belonging to, or taken on lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of Balmer Lawrie and Company Limit- ed, within the municipal limits of the City of Calcutta, West Bengal, (except such of them as are under tho ad- ministrative control of the other Estate Officers).
" [F. No.P-44020/33/82-MKT 1
KULDIP SINGH, Under SeJy.
MINISTRY OF ACRICULTURE
(Depiirtiient of Food)
CORRIGENDUM
Niw DMv, ths 18th Navomber, 1982
S.O. 4200.-I'l this Dep lament's Order No. 52/21/65 (EZ)/FCII(/Vol. IV dated 7-U-74, the followlg correction shall be carried out :
S. N i. H t'w O; lor C >rre;ticm to be carried out
132 For the wmls "Sh ri Hiramoy N .nd" in Col. 2, read "Shri Hiianmoy Nandy."
[N->. 52/2/32/FCIH] R.K. S1NOH, Dy- Secy.
MINISTRY OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT
(Transport Wing)
New Delhi, the 30th November, 1982
S.O. 4201.—Jn excicise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (3) and (4) of hection 5A of the Dock Workers (Regula- tion of Employment) Act, 1948 (9 of 1948), the Central Gov- ernment hereby appoints the Traffic Manager, Mormugao, Port Trust, Moimugao, as a member of the said Board and further directs that the following amendment shall be made in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Shipping and Transport (Transport Wing) No. S.O. 2969 dated the 10th August, 1982 published in tho Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3(ii) dated the 21st August, 1982, namely :—
In tho said notification, under the heading "Membera representing the Central Government", for the entry against item No. (4), the entry "Traffic Manager, Mormugao Port Trust, Mormugao" shall be substituted.
[File No. LDG|6|82-US(L)] THOMAS MATHEW, Unc'cr Secy.
4336 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]MINISTRY OF WORKS & HOUSING
(Diicctorate of Estates)
New DeJhi, the 22nd November, 198J
S.O. 4202.—-In pursuance of rule 45 of the Fundamental Rules the President hereby rrmkes the following rules further to amend the Allotment of Government Residences (General Fool IQ Delhi) Rules, 1963, namely:—
1. (I) These rules may be called ths Allotment of Go- vernment Residence^ (Genial Pool in Delhi) Second A w n- dmeut Rules, 1982.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publi-
cation in the Official Gazette.
2, In Ihe Allotment of Government Residences (General Pool in Delhi) Rules, 1963, after Supplcmctntrary Rule 317- £1-2, for the heading and Supplementary Rule 317-B-3, the following shall be substituted namely :—•
"Allotment to house owning officers"
Supplementary Rule 317-B-3:
(1) In this rule :—
(a) "adjoining jnunieiality" means any municipality Contiguous to a local municipality;
(b) 'houce" in relation to an officer or member of his family means a building or pait there of used for resi- dential proposes and situated within the jurisdiction of a local municipality or of any adjoining municipality.
Explanation :—A building, part of which is used for resi- dential purposes, shall be" deemed to be a house for the purposes of this claVise notwithstanding that any part of it is used for non-residential purpose;
(c) "local municipality" in relation to an officer means the municipality within whose jurisdiction hU office is located;
(d) "member of family" in relation to an officer means the wife or housband, as the case may be, or a dependent child of the officer;
(e) "municipality'' includes municipal corpoiaiion a municipal commiltee or board, a town area com- mittee, a notified area committee, and a canton- i ment board.
(2) An officer owning a house either in his own name or in the name of any member of his family at the place of his duty or in an adjoaining municipality shall be eligible for allotment of Government residence on payment of licence fee for the Government accommodation allotted to him at such rate as may be dcteirnined from time to time by the Government.
(3) When after a Government residence has been allotted to an officer, he or any member of hig lamily becomes owner of a house at the rlac-e of his duty oi in an adjoining municipality, such officer shall notify the fact to the Director of Estates within a period of one month from the date the house is let out or occupied, Or (he date of completion, whichever is earlier"
[File No. 12033(6)[75-Pol. If (Vol. H]
4337(Directorate ol Estate*)
N;w Djihi, the 24th November, 1982
S O,4ii)3. — Ii f.-xsrc;iij of file p">wors coiferrod by section
3 of t\n Publij Pr'raises ('-.victbn of Uuurttorisel' Occupints) Act ^71 (40 -f 117,), the Cj'itr'IOJVcrtimctit hereby appoints theo/fi:?r mentioned incol'inyi (1) of the tible below, being ? giz.jttcd ofiVer of Oiver'i'nent to b^ t,i'Kc Offi;cr for the purp53<;s of the s iJ Act anj the said officer, sh;.ll cxeicisc the powers conferred and perform the duties i m p o rt o'l Estate Offljer by or uider the s IUI act with in the 1OCF.1 limiti ft' his jurisdiction in resfiCt of the public pranises specified in column (2) of the s'.id tnble.
TABLE
Designation of the Officer Categories of public premises a ii TOCLI limits of jurisdiction
Executive Engineer, Gmgtok Centr il Division G^ngtok.
Premiws belongins; to or tiken on lc.iso by or on behalf of Coitril Gjvcrnnunt within thj limiti of Gingtok.
[P. No. 21012 /2/82-Fol IV] R.3. SOOD, Dy. Director of Cscatei
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS
(P & T Board)
New Delhi, the 6th December, 1982
S.O. 4204,—In pursuance of pnrn u) of Section III of Rule 434 of Tndi.in Idetfr.-inh Rules, 1951, as introduced by S.O. No. 627 dated f>lh March, 1^60, the Director Gene- ra!, Posti and Telegraphs, heeby snecifi."^ 1S-12-19R2 :\i the ds>te on which the Measured Rate System will be introduced in Manimala Telephone Exchange, Kerala Circle.
[No. 5-10/82-PHBI
1042 GT/82—4
S.O. 4205,—In pursuance of para (a) cf Section IJ7 of Rule 434 of Indian TelcgraDh Rules, 1951, as introduced by S.O. No. 627 dated 8*h March, I960, the Director Gene- ral, Posts and Telegraphs, hen-hy specifies 16-12-1982 as the date on which the Measured Rate System will be introduced in Yerraguntla Telephone Exchange, A.P. Circle.
[No. 5-6/81-PHBl
S.O. 4206,—In pursuance of para (a) of Section III of Rule 434 of Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, as introduced by S,O. No. 627 dated 8th March, 1960, the Director Gene- ral, Posts and Telegraphs, hereby specifies 16-12-1982 as the date on which the Measured Rate System will be introduced in Smandai Telephone Exchange, Tamil Nadu Circle
tNo. 5-4/82-PHBT R. C. KATARIA, Asstt. Dirtctor General
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND REHABILITATION
(Department of Rehabilitation)
New Delhi, the 23rd November, 1982
8.O. 4207.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of Section 6 of the Administration of Evacuee property Act. 1950 (31 of 1950), the Central Government appoinis loint Secretary (Rehabilitation and Deputy Secre- tary (Rehabilitation), as the case may be, in the Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu as Additional Cus- todian of Evacuee Property, in addition. to his own duties for the purpose or dischaiginp the duties imposed on the fustodinn by cj- under the 'aid Act in respect of evacuee ptopeitics in the State of Tamil Nadu.
2. This supersedes Notification No. 27(2)173-SS. II, dated the 24th December, 1977.
[No. l(19)|Spl. Cell.l82-SS. n (all
4338 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, I982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 fPART II— SEC. 1 >'New Delhi, the 22nd November, 1982
S.O. 4208.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of Section 3 of the Displaced Persons (Ccm- pensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 (44 of 1954), the Central Government hereby appoints the Deputy Secretary (Rehabilitation), Government of Gujarat, Revenue Depart- ment, a* Deputy Chief Settlement Commissioner in the State of Gujarat for the purpose of performing, in addition to his own duties, the functions assigned to a Deputy Chief Settlement Commissioner by or under the said Act, with immedjate effect.
2. This supersedes Notification No. 1(3)/Spl. Cell/79-SS.
II(A) dated 8-1-1982.
[No. l(21)/Spl. Cell/82-SS. D(A)I
S.O. 4209.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sec- tion 5 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 (XXXI of 1950), the Central Government hereby appoints the Deputy Secretary (Rehabilitation), Government of Guja- rat, Revenue Department, as Deputy Custodian General for the purpose of discharging the duties imposed on such Deputy Custodian General by or under the said Act, with immediate effect.
2. This supersedes Notification No. 1(3)/Spl. Cell/79-SS.
II.(E) dated the 8th January, 1982.
INo l(21)/Spl. Cell/82-SS. n(E)> S.O. 4210.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of Section 6 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 (XXXI cf 1950), the Central Govern- ment hereby appoints for the State of Gujarat the Under Secretary Rehabilitation) In the Revenue Department of the State Government of Gujarat as Additional Custodian of EvaciKe Property for the purpose of discharging the duties imposed on. such Additional Custodian by or under the said Act with immediate effect.
2. This supersedes Notification No. 1(3)/Spl Cell/79-SS.
II. dated the 17th July, 1979.
[No l(21)/Spl. Cell/82-SS. II(G)J M. K KANSAL, Under Secy.
(Department of Labour)
New Delhi, the 6th December, 1982
S.O. 4211 In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1$47 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Gov- ernment industrial Tribunal Calcutta in the industrial dis- pute between the employers in relation to the management of Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 24th Novem- ber, 1982.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT CALCUTTA
Reference No. 28 of 1981
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management of Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta
AND
Their Workmen
PRESENT:
Mr. Justice M. P. Singh, Presiding Officer.
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of Employers—Shri D. K. Mukheriee. Indus- . trial Relations Officer.
On behalf of Workmen—Shri Satyen Das, Secretary of the Union.
STATE : West Bengal INDUSTRY ,- Coal Mines
AWARD
The following dispute was sent to this Tribunal for adju- dication by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide Ordei No. L-32011/6/81-D.IV(A) dated 23rd June, 1981
"Whether the management in relation to Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta are justified in allowing Sarvashri Bankim Sarkar, Anil Mukherjee, Anil Kumar Deb- nath Sudhir Mandal, San*i Ranjan Bapari and others employed as L.R. Fireman-II undec the Engineer Superintendent in October 1977 to supersede Sarva- shri Monoranjan Bera, Ranajit Bag, Jausen Seal, Anil Kumar Sarma, Puma Chandra Koley and others employed a
2. The dispute relates to a claim of inter se seniority be'- ween two groups of workmen of CPT—one group claiming seniority over the other in the Engineer Superintendent's
4339Section of the Marine Department. Forty-four leavo reserve posts of Kreman II under the Engineer Superintendent in the Marine Department vveie filled by persons from two sources, (i) 14 by pi emotion from existing permanent Bhan- daris and (li) 30 by direct recruitment from the cx-CPT (briefly, the Boaid) lascais. 'Ihese ex-CPT laseais were not workmen of the Uoaid but their names were maintained in a list cy the DiiLClor of the Marine department for the purpose of filling casual vacancies jn the post of lascars. The C.X.-CPT lascais Munoiamnn Bera antf 29 others joined the post of Hienwn 11 (l./R) on 19-9-77. The permanent Bhandaiies Bankim Chandia Saikar and 13 others could not be leleused fioiw their parent section due to the fear in *he dislocation of work in scvci.it operational points and they could join only in October 1977 under the Engineer Superin- tendent in the Muiine Department.
3. The Union aigucs that th; seniority of an employee is counted iiom the date of appointment in a particular rank, or grade as per seniority Rules of the CPT (vide Ext. M. 12 dated 2nd June, iy.iS) but the management has made a depaituie iiom this rule. Reference is made to rule (i) of the ijenioiuy Rules which piovide "The Seniority of a man in a grade should be deteiimned on the basis, of total length oi his serviu; in that grade or in an equivalent (trade". In my opinion, the aigu.nent of the Union is misconceived. A Selection Committee consisilng of M. P. S. Sodni, Assis- tant Engineer Superintendent, P.R. Uhawmik, Junioi Marine Engineer and S. K. Mukhirjce Personnel Officer was ad- mittedly constituted in 'Jw year 1977. They admittedly inter- viewed the candidates in September of that year, namely, the Bh.inJaiics and the cx-CPT lascars The Committee ad- judge the mfrit of the candidates and it was in the order of merit that the position of the 44 selected candidates (14 Bhandaries and 30 ex-CPT lascersi weie feed. Their inter sn seniority, therefore, was determined in accordance with tnc place obtained by them in the interview irrespective of time taken by them in joining the post. The management hag m their written statement, paragraph 8, mentioned the senio- rity position of the 44 selected candidates. There is no conflict between (he seniority rule? and the merit list pre- pared by 1he Selection Committee. The seniority rules do not provide for a situation when the recruitment is made from two sources, that is, by promotion from existing staff and by direct recruitment from outside. Fven the Da? Gupta Tribunal Award of 1958 in Reference No. 1 of 1956 does not provide for such a situation.
4. Mr, Mukherjcc, appealing for the management, is right in tontending that the seniority of the sleeted candidates in the instant case for the post of L/R Fireman II was deter- mined on the basis of their performance in the selection interview and that the ,ame is not open to challenge. The management ha? examined S. K. Asthana, Assistant Engineer Superintendent, Ip say that the Selection Committee consider- ed the inter uc icmoiity and formulated seniority. In my opinion, his evidence >s reliable and it is supported by mate- rials on record. The management has filed several docu- ments showing the. terms of settlement between the parlies. ISSIJC of circulars and letters in connection with the appoint- ment in the post of L|R Fireman IT. I think that it is not necessary to discus*, them because of the view expressed above. 1 am of definite opinion that the seniority in the present case is to be determined according to the merit list preparel byi the Selection Committee.
5. Before J conclude this case T would like to mention that the seniority list prepared by tha Engineer Superintendent in accordance with the merit list of the Selection Committee was placed on the Notioc Board on 8th December, 1977 for information of all concerned, but no objection was received from any quarter. This alco goes to indicate that the list became final not to be challenged later,
6. In the result, my award is that the management in re- lation to the Calcutta Port Trust. Calcutta are justified in employing Bankim Sarkar and 13 others (the Bhandaries) as L|R Foreman II under the Engineer Superintendent in October, 1977 and in allowing them to supersede Monoranjan Bera and 29 others ex-CPT lascars as L/R Fireman TI. The concerned workmen, therefore, are not entitled to any relief.
Dated, Calcutta,
M P, SINGH, Presiding Officer.
The I6'h November, 19R2
INo. L-32011/6/81/D-lV(A)) S.O. 4212.—In pursuance of lection 17 of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), \he Central Govern- ment hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrie] Tribunal, Calcutta in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 24th November, 1982.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA
Reference No. S of 1981
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management of Calcutta
Port Trust, Calcutta.
AND
Their Workmen.
PRESENT:
Mr. Justice M. P. Singh—Presiding Officer
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of Employer*—Mr. D. K. Mukherjee, Indut-
trial Relations Officer."
On behalf of Workmen—Mr. R. N. Chandra, Assistant General Secretary with Mr. Paresh Bose, Assistant Secretary of the. Union.
STATE : West Bengal. INDUSTRY : Port & Dock.
AWARD
The Go\ernmcnt of India, Ministry of Labour by their Order No. L-32012/13/8O-D. 1V(A) deted 17th February, 1981 referred the following dispute to th;s Tribunal for ad- judication :
"Whether the management in relation to the Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta are justified in ignoring the claim of Shri Shyam Charan Mitra, Tracer, for promotion to the post of Junior Draftsman in the- River Training Wing? If not, to what relief Is th" concerned workman entitled ?"
2. The reference must be answered in affirmative ind *o ihe concerned workman is not entitled to any relief. No employee has a right to be promoted. Promotion is • management's function. Mr. Shyam Charan Mitra could not claim to be piomoted as a matter of right to the post of Junior Draftsman in the River Training Wing. His whole case i" that the management acted illegally in bringing D.P. Bhattacharya from some other unit and to promote him to the post of Junior Draftsman in the River Training Wing (unit) in the year 1979 ignoring his claim. The workman submitted that the post of Junior Draftsman in the River Training Wing fell vacant in 1979, that it was to be filled up by promotion of a senior and suitable workman from the establishment of the River Ttaining Wing and Mr. Milra being the scnlormost tracer in that wing vjas eligible for promotion to that post. The woikmen say that Mr. Mitra applied for that post several times but' his claim was wrong- fully ignored by the management and that the management illegally brought another tracer D. P. Bhattacharya from a separate unit by transfer only to defeat the riflht of Mr. M'itra and promoted him to the post which is an imposition on the workmen of the River Training Winjt and to blur their future and certain their rights to promotion to tho higher post in their own heirarchy. Sri R. N. Chandra, Assistant General Secretary of the Union has vehemently contended that no employee of the CPT could be transferred from one department to another department in the same cadr" and this is a rule existing for 112 years. Mr. Mukhsrje* for the management submits that there is no such rule.
3. In my opinion the contention of Sri R. N. Chandra is incorrect and misplaced. Jt is not a case of promotion of D. P. Bhattacharya in supersession of the claim of Mr.
4340 THE GAZETTE1 OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAMAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]CPT and that the River Training Wins is a section of the Hydraulic Study department in which the disputant wcrk- man Shyam Chilian M"itra iS employed. It is thus clear that River Training Wing is not a department separate from Hy- draulic Study department as has been argued by the work- men before this Tribunal. My concluded opinion is that the workman has no case.
4. For the reasons given above, my award is that tho management in relation to ihe Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta are justified in ignoring the claim of Sri Shyam Charan Mitrn, Tracer for promotion to the post of Junior Drafts- m;in in the River Training Wing. It follows that the con- cerned workman is not entitled to any relief.
Dated : Calcutta 11-11-82.
M.P. SINGH, Presiding Officer [No. L-32012/13/80/D-IV (A) ] T.B. SITARAMAN, Desk Officer
New Delhi, the 21st November, 1982
S.O. 4213.—In pursuance of section 17 of tho Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 <14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes tho following award of the Central Govern- ment Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad in the industnal dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Nkhitput Colliery of Messrs Bharat Coking Coal Limtted, Post Office Sijun, District Dhanbad and their workmen,
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In tho matter of a reference under Sec, 10(1 jCd) of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947
Reference No. 44 of 1982
Dhanbad, the 3rd November, 1982
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management of Nichitpur Colliery of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., P.O. Sijua, Dist. Dhanbad.
AND
Their Woikmen.
PRESENT:
Mr. Justice Monoranjan Prasud (Retd.) Presiding Officer.
APPEARANCES :
For the Employers—Sari G. Prasad, Advocate.
For the Workmep—None.
STATE: Bihar.
INDUSTRY: Coal.
The present reference arises out of Order No. L-20012O)/ 82-D. HI (A), dated. New Delhi, the 30th April/3 rd May, 1982 passed by the Central Government in respect of an industrial dispute between the parties mentioned above. The subject matter of the dispute has been specified in the schedule to the said order and tho (.aid schedule runs as follows :
"Whether the demand of the workman of Nichitpur Colliery of Messrs Bharat Coking Coal Limited, iPost Office Sijua, Dis'rict Dhanbad for reinstatement of Shri Jagamath Mahalo, Timber Mazdoor is justified ? If so, to what relief is the said workman entitled 7"
2. The dispute has been settled out of Court. A memoran- dum of settlement dated 15-9-1982 has been filed in Court. I have gone through the teims of settlement and I find them quite fair and reasonable. There is no reason why an award should not be made on the terms and conditions laid down in the memorandum of settlement. I accept it and make an award accordingly. The meforandum of settlement shall form part or the award.
Reference No. 44 of 1982
4341BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. II, DHANBAD
Reference No. 44 of 1982
PARTIES ;
Employers in iclalion to the management of Nit-hitpur Colliery of M/s. Bhaiut Cokinfi Coal Ltd. and their workmen represented by RCMS.
The patties as mentioned above befi to submit a" here-
under :—
Tbat, the pauies huve agreed to settle the matter tending before the Tubunul in the mutter of reference mentioned above on the following terms and conditions:—•
(A) That, Shn Jagarnath Mnhato, the concerned workman, who was suffering from eye cataract, has been operated upon and his visibility has. been restored.
(B) That, it is agreed that the concerned workman will be taken back into employment in case he is found medically fit.
(C) That, the concerned workman shall be cflercd emp-
loyment on a job suited to his physical fitness.
(D) That, the concerned woikman shall not be entitled (o any wages or monetary relief by way of compensation oj otherwise for the period of his idleness.
(E) That, in case the concerned workman in still not found fit to work in a Colliery by the Medical Board, the son of t-hri Jagarnath Mahato shall be offered employment as a special case to work as miner, subject to his medical fitness by the Board.
(F) That, the terms of settlement mentioned hereinabovc shall be implemented as' early as possible but not later than 45 days from the date.
(G) That, the settlement- mentioned bereinubove shall not le cited as precedent since this has been agreed to ar a special case on compassionate ground.
(H) That, the terms of the settlement mentioned hereinabovo are agreeable to both the parties and hence it is Prayed that an Award can bo passed In terms of the settlement mentioned herelnabove.
That, for act of this kindness, the above paitiea shall ever
pray.-
(P. R. Sinha) General Manager.
(D. B. Pandey) Personnel Manager.
Secretary R.C.M.S. L.T.I, of Sri JaoarnaLh Mahato. Workman concerned
Witnesses:
(Department of Labour)
1. Mahadev Singh
ORDER
2. Shrikant Chobey.
New Delhi, the 23rd Nivember, 1982 L.T.I, of Sri Triloki Mahato.
Part of the Award
INo. L-2OO12/3/82-D.III(A)l
S.O. 4Z14.—Whereas the Ccntial Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the em- ployees in relation to the Rajasthan State Mineral Develop- ment Corporation Limited and their workmen in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;
And whereas the Central Government considers it deiir-
abie to refer th" said dispute for adjudication.
Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 7A, and clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Cen- tral Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal of which Shri G. S. Barot shall be the Presiding Officer, with headquarters at Ahmedabad and refcis the said dispute for adjudication to the said Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the office order No. M-MAD /Union /GFPJ/ 5/76/2140 dated the 2nd March, 1981 issued bv Shri N. N. Tankha Chief of personnel and Ad- ministration. Rajajthan State Mineral Development Corporation Limited Jaipur ordering to recover th"
4342 THE GAZETTE OF^INDlA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAtfAYANA 27, 1004 [PART II—SEC 3(ii)]alleged excess payment made to 23 employees men- tioned in annexure A is legal, proper and justi- fied ? If not, to what relief is the workmen cntitl- ed ?"
ANNEXURE
Name of the employee
Sl. No.
1. 2. 3. A. 5. 6. 7, 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16, 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22, 23,
Shri O. P. Tank Shri Jov Joseph Shri Rashid Khan Shri Radhakishna Snarma Shxi Madan Singh Shri B. S- Kamal Shri Ran Singh Shri Pema Ram Shri Hoota Ram Shri Hukka Ram Shri Hogia Shri Padma R"m Shri Badri Narauan Shri Meeta Ram Shri Shankla Ram Shri Khcma Ram Shri Pata Ram Shri Narayan/Vagtaji Shri Narayan/Ramaji Shri Ganehsa Ram. Shri Salish Kumar Dave Shri Muga Ram Shri Puna Ram.
(No. L-29011/27/81-D.IIKB)]
Nsw Delhi, \he 6th December, 1982
S.O. 4215.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial
Disputts Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Gov- ernment Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad in the industrial dis- pute between the employers in relation to the management of Limestone Quarry of Sone Valley Port Land Cement Company Limited and their workmen, which was received by this Ministry on 24th November, 1982.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of a reference under Section 10(lXd) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Reference No. 32 of 1977
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management of the Lime- stone Quarry of Sone Valley Port Land Cement Company Limited, Post Office Baulin, District Roh- tas.
AND
Their Workmen,
PRESENT:
Mr, Justice Manoranjan Prasad (Retd.), Presiding Officer.
APPEARANCES:
t or the Employers—Shri N. C. Ganguly, Advocate. For the Baulia Quarry Rashtriya Mazdoor Sewa Sanjjh—
Shri Sati Sbankar Sharma, Vice-Prcsident.
STATE : Bihar.
INDUSTRY : Limestone.
Dhanbad, the 18th November, 1982
AWARD
The present reference arises out of Order No. L-29011/57/ 74-LRIV, dated, the 13th January, 1975, passed by the Cen- tral Government
"Whether the following demands of Uie workmen of the Limestone Quarry of the gone Valley Portland Cement Company Limited, Post Office Baulia. Dii- trict Rohtas &re justified? If so, to what relief and from what date are the workmen entitled ?
Demands
(aj Workmen who have put in six months ur more of
continuous service be made permanent.
(b) Re-designation and grading of the workmen accord-
ing to the nature of work peiformed.
(c) Payment of bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (21 of 1965J for the years 1968, 1969, 1970 and 1973".
2, The above dispute has been settled out of Court. A memorandum of settlement arrived at on 17th December, 1977 had been filed in this Court jointly signed by the Gene- ral Manager and the Quarry Supenntendent on behalf of the management and the General Secretary and Vice Presi- dent on behalf of the sponsoring union, Baulia Quarries Mazdoor Sangh'. This settlement was, however, initially ob- jected to by the intervener union, the Baulia Quarry Rash- triya Mazdoor Sewa Sangh. But subsequently a petition dated 25th June, 1982 had been filed on behalf of the management alongwith a petition signed by the President of the intcrT vener union, the Bauha Quarry Reshtriya Mazdoor Sewa Sangh which, has also subsequently been signed by its Vice- Presidcnt, to the effect that the dispute has been amicably settled by the intervener union also with the management on the same terms and conditions as contained in the afore- said settlement arrived at on 17th December, 1977 between the management and the sponsoring union, the Baulia Quar- ries Mazdoor Sangh, and that an award may be made in terms thereof. J have gone through the terms of settlement and 1 find them quite fair and reasonable and there is no reason why an award should not he made on the terms und conditions laid down in the memorandum of settlement. I accept it and ninke an award accordingly. The memorandum of settlement arrived at on 17th December, 1977 between the management and the Baulia Quarries Mazdoor Sangh as well as the petition dated 26lh June, 1982 of the manage- ment alongwith the petition filed on behalf of the Baulia Quarries Rashtriya Mazdoor Sewa Sangh adopting and ac- cepting the aforesaid settlement shall form part of the award.
3. Let a copy of this award be sent to the Ministry ai required under Section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
MANROJAN PRASAD, Presiding Officer
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOV- ERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
Reference Case No. 32 of 1977
BETWEEN
The Management of Baulia Limestone Quarries of Merisre*
Sone Vulley Portland Cement Co, Ltd.,
AND
Their workmen
The humble petition on behalf of the Management.
Most respectfully shewcth;
1. That the above mentioned case is fixed for hearing on
the 5th July, 1982.
That the dispute between management and Baulia quarries1 Rashtriya Mazdoor Seva Sangb, hav" amicably settled their dispute outside the court as per agreement enclosed herewith.
It is therefore prayed that the case be fixed for hearing on 22nd, June, 1982 and order may kindly be passed in presence of the parties.
And for this the petitioner shall ever pray.
For and on behalf of the management
for
Sd/- Illegible Sd/- Designation Advocatt 25-6-82, Peraonal Manager. 25-6-1982. Part of the award.
4343BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOV- ERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
Reference No. 32 of 1977
BETWEEN
The Management of Baulia Limestone Quarriej of Messr"
Sone Valley Portland Cement Co. Ltd.
AND
Their workmen.
The humble petition on behalf of the Baulia Quany Rashtriya Mazdoor Seva Sangh represented by President Jaganarain Pathak.
Most respectfully sheweth:
1. That the instant refeience was made at the instance of Baulia Quarry Mazdoor Sangh represented bv Sri Yadu- bansh Singh, General Secretary.
2. That during the pendency of the said reference there was a settlement between the management of Sone Valley Portland Cement Co. Ltd,, and Baulia Quarries Mazdoor Sangh on 17th Decembei, 1977. The management has canicd out the obligation under the said agreement and all the workmen have been benefited.
3. That the Baulia Quarries Rashtriya Mazdoor Seva Snngh was not a party io the reference but having come to learn that the matter has been settled, it filed an application for • being impleaded ns n party in order to examine the efficacy
of the said settlement.
4. That this Hon'ble Tribunal was pleased to implead the "aid union as a party to the proceeding and it has been le- presentcd through its Vice President Shri Sati Shanker Sharma* and the question of acceptance of the settlement is pending for final decision as to whether an award should be made in accordance with the said terms.
5. That there have been some disputes with respect to contract labour in the establishment which have been satis- factorily settled between the management and the workmen leprcsented by the Baulia Quarry Mazdoor Sangh as well as Baulio Qiurry Rashtriya Mazdoor Seva Sangh.
6. That this has brought a complete industrial peace in
the establishment in view of the good gesture of the man- agement and the union wants to fully cooperate with the management to raise its production keeping in view its finan- cial condition and its ability to shoulder additional burden.
7. That in \iew of cordial relationship and keeping in view the interest of the management as well as the work- men, the petitioner union accepts the agreement made with Baulia Quarry Mazdoor Sangh on 17th December, 1977 as acceptable to it as well. It does not want to raise objection to its being adopted as an award of the Court, there being no dispute between the parties.
8. That the petitioner, therefore, joined hands with the other union of the establishment, namely, Baulia Quarry Mazdoor Sangh, by petition dated 6th March, 1978 by which petition th<' agreement made was filed before this Hon'ble Tribunal.
It is theieforc, prayed that your Lordship may be pleased Ib let an award be made in terms of the agreement dated 17lh December, 1977 or your lordship may pass such other order or order* as to your Lordship may appear fit and proper.
And for thisi the petitioner shall ever pray.
Sd/- Sati Shanker Sharma Up-Sabhapati, 1R-11-82 Baulia Quarries Rashtriyn Mazdoor Seva Sangh. "Memorandum of settlement arrived at between the Man- agement of Sone Valley Portland Cement Company Limited, Baulia Quarries, Baulia and their workmen represented by Baulia Quarries Mazdoor Sangh on Saturday, the I7ih De- cember, 1977>at Japla Cement Factory.
Representing Fmployei
1. Shri P. C. Jain,
General Manager.
2. Shri R. K. Agarwal.
Quarry Superintendent.
Representing Workmen
Shri Jadubans Singh,
•General Secretary,
Baulia Quarries Mazdoor Sannh.
Shri Suraj Singh,
Vice President,
iBanlia Quarries Mazdoor Sangh.
SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE
Whereas Baulia Quarries Mazdoor Sangh submitted a char-
tei of demands vide their letter dated 1st October, 1974.
And whereas the Government of India, vide its order No. 1-29011/57/74/LRIV dated 17th April, 1975 referred the above demands of the Union for an adjudication under Sec- lion 10(,lJ(dj of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and the same is pending adjudication before the Presiding Officer. Central Government, Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad and the disputes has been numbered as Ref. No. 3 of 1975 (Old)/No. 32 of 1977 (New).
And whereas in the interest of maintaining peace, harmony <
(1) It has been agreed to give one ad-hoc increment to such employees only who have already reached the maximum of their grades w.e.f. 1st January, 1978.
(21 The grades and fitment of the employees were duly reviewed and it has been agreed to revise the grades and fitment in the manner as per list attached which is marked as Annexure-I. This will be w.c.f. 1st January, 1978.
(3) Though the Company is not in a position to bear the additional burden, but in the interest of long- term peace and better production, harmony and co- operation, it has been agreed to take 200 persons on peimanent roll w.e.f. 1st January, 1978. The list of such persons is attached and marked as Annexurc-II.
(4) Tt has been agreed to pay minimum bonus of 4 per cent only for the years 196K, 1969, 1970 and 1973 in the manner as staled below:
The bonus for the above years will be paid ia a phased raanner i.e. during every quarter of 1978, one year's minimum bonus will be paid in three instalments.
(5) It has been further agreed to file this settlement befoie the Industrial Tribunal with a request to dispose off the Reference on the above disputes ai per terms of this settlement and incorporate the same in the award,
(6) This agreement will hold good subject to the Award
Representing Employer .
(1) Sd/- P. C. Jain, Representing Workmen;
General Manager. Sd/- Jadubansh Singh, 17-12-1977,
(2) Sd/- R. K. Agarwal General Secretary,
Quarry Superintendent Baulia Quarries Ma/door Sangh,
L ' Sd/- Suraj Singh,
Vice-President,
Baulia Quairies Mazduor Sangh.
WITNESSES :
(1) Khan Gul Khan
(2) T. P. Sinha.
Part of the Award
4344 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART 1 1 - S E C. 3(ii)]ANNB SONS VALLEY PORTLAND CEMENT LTD..
Statement showing Re-designatidn
PRESENT
E. No. Name Designation Grade - Rate of Pay
Basic D.A. A.D.A. P.A. H.A. Total
Staff Sn' Gopal Ram Mech. Foreman VII 299.78 96.00 29.98 19 50 445.26
Staff Sri Anjarii Kumar Foreman VI 353.78 96.00 35.38 — 18.20 503.36
'Staff Sri B.D. Agrawal Sr. Asitt. Acctt. VI 434.33 96.00 '43.43 — 18.20 591.96
Staff Sri R.N. Tiwary Asstt. Acctt./PFC V 328.05 96.00 32.81 — 18.20 475.06
Staff Sri P.N. Chakarbarry Clerk/Asstt. Cashier . I 156.65 96.00 15.67 — 13.00 281.32
Staff Sri P.K. Jain .. Assistant III 183.05 96.00 18.31 — 15.60 312.98
Staff Sri B.K. Chattaraj Clerk III 181.51 96.00 18.15 15.60 311.26
Staff Sri Baliram Mishra II 162.00 96.00 16.20 — 15.60 289.80
Staff Sri J.K. Bhattacharji „ I 352.97 96.00 15.30 — 13.00 in,2i
Staff Sri Ram Hari Ram I 117.95 96.00 11.80 — 13.00 283.75
Staff Sn Khangul Khan T.C. 114.31 96.00 11.43 13.00 234-74
Staff Sri Loknath Mishra „ T.C. 115.00 96.00 11.50 — 13.00 235.50
Staff Sri Rajkishre Singh *" T.C. 100.00 96.00 10.00 13.00 219.00
1691 Sri Banarsi Mishra Munshi C 92.56 87.50 9.26 13.00 202.32
1662 Sri Ram Sunder Kolii it C 107.40 87.50 10.74 — 13.00 218.64
114 Sri Ram Bahadur Ram Splicer 99.09 87.50 9.91 13.00 209.50
1713 SriShco Kumar Munshi C 92.56 87.50 9.26 — 13.00 202.32
Staff Sri S.P. Sinha Compoonder/ IV 292.05 96.00 29.21 — 15.60 432.86
Storekeeper.
3.00") Rifle Allow.
W/W Sri Setu Lall Ilavildar c 106.89 }• 87.50 10.69 — 13.00 232.08
9.00J Ration A, cont.
1766 SriH.P. Shukla Mate c 92.56 87\50 9.26 13.00 202.32
, 214 Sri Ram Lakhan Mishra A 162.25 87.50 16.23 — 15.60 281.58
381 Sri Damodar Tiwary A 163.98 87.50 16.40 — 15.60 283.48
593 Sri Sobaram Singh A 176.98 87.50 17.70 15.60 297.78
667 Sri Shariff Shaikh B 132.36 87.50 13.24 — 15.60 248.70
WATCH &WARD.
Sri Ram Lagan Ram Sentry R 76.70 87.50 — 1.82 13.00 188.02
9.00
Sri Haribansh Singh •• E 76.70 1
9.00 J- 17,50 — — 13.00 188.02
ELECTRIC & WATER SUPPLY J
241 Sri Ram Pd. Chaudhary B 158.35 87.30 15.84 — 15.60
111.29
Elec. Mech.
Fltter/Wireman/
Armaturo winder
251 Sri Nasiruddin Sk. Fitter C 110.78 87.50 11.08 13.00 222.36
242 Sri Krishna Lohar Fitter C 118.49 87.50 11.85 13.00 230.84
1695 Sri Sheo Pd. Pandey R Attendant/ D 77.00 87.50 3.85 — 13.00 181.35
Khalasl
1697 Sri InamKlian P. Attd./B.D.F. D 77.00 8T.5O 3.85 — 13.00 181.35
Khalasi.
MAINT. & CIVIL
181 Sri Azimuddin Khan Turner/Welder B 160.08 87.50 16.01 15.60 279.19
169 Sri Suresh Ch. Roy Asstt, Welder D 91.33 87.50 4.56 — 13.00 196.39
1698 Sri Gancsh Pathak A. Wclder/Lhalaai D 77.00 87.50 3.85 — 13.00 181.35
1706 Sri Ab. Rnsid Khalasl E 71.28 87.50 _ _ 13.00 171.78
HOSPITAL
339 Sri Ramchandra Mester Helper Dresier/ E 76r7O 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
Sweeper
TRANSPORT
257 Sri Keshwar Kahar Fitter U 156.00 87.50 15.60 — 15.60 274.70
258 Sri Ramkeshwar Nai Fitter B 156.00 87.50 15.60 15.60 274.70
1702 Sri Md. Khalil B.D.F./Khalasi D 77,00 87,50 3.85 13.00 181.35
MISC.
1759 Sri Jitondrn Pd. Sinha Munsh) D 71.15 B7.5O 3.55 — 13.00 175.20
4343
XURE.l LIMESTONE QUARRY, BAULIA. *nd Change of Grade.
REVJSED
Rate of P,iy
Daigir.ticm Grade Basic D.A. A D A. P. A- H.A. Totd Renurks
Mech. Ft rent" n VII 115.03 96.03 31.50 — 19.50 462.00
Foreman vu 375.00 '06.00 37.50 19,50 528.00
Sr. Asalt. Acctl, VII 455.00 96,00 45,50 19.50 616.00
A.A./P.F.C. V 343.00 96,00 34.30 18.20 491.50
Clerk/Asstt. Cashier IT 161.00 96.00 16.20 15.60 — 289.80
Stores Assft. III 190.00 96,00 19.00 — 15.60 320,60
Clc:k III 190 00 ¥6.00 J9.00 15.60 320.60
f T III 166.00 96.00 16.60 — 15,60 294.20
pt If 155.00 96.00 15.50 — 15.60 282.10
Jt II 119.00 96,00 U.90 15.60 242.50
II 119.00 96.00 11.90 15.60 242.50
u 1 117.00 96.00 11.70 — 13.00 237.70
11 i 101.03 96,00 10.20 13.03 221.20
Typist/Clerk I 97,00 96.00 9.70 — 13.00 215.70
Rspeway Clerk I 112.00 96.00 11.20 — 13.00 23^.20
A"tt, Foreman T 102.00 96.00 JO.20 13.00 221.20
I 97.00 96.00 9.70 — 13.00 215.70
Compomider/Storckoopor. V 113.00 96.00 31.30 — 18.20 458.50
W/Waril Suporviior I 5.00
112.00 96.00 11.20 — 13.00 246.20
9.00
Foreman III 200.00 96.00 20.00 — 15.60 331.60
Mate II 169.00 96.00 16,90 — 15.60 297.50
Mat© II 169.00 96,00 16.90 — 15.(JO 297.50
Mute II 183.00 96.00 18.30 — 15.60 312.90
Mite II 137.00 96.00 13.70 — 15.60 202.30
Asttl.HwIIdnr. D 78.00 87,50 3.90 13.00 191.40 RA. Con.
9.00
D 78.00 87,50 3r9O — 13.00 191.40
9.00
Elcc. Meeh. Fitter/Wireman/ A 170.30 87.50 17.03 — 15.60 290.43
Armature Winder
Elect. Fitter B 117,00 87.50 11.70 — 15.60 231.80
Fitter C 125.32 87.50 12.53 - 13.00 238.35
Pump Altcnd&rU D 77.00 87.50 3.85 - 13.00 181.35
pump Attendant. D 77.00 87.50 3.85 ^ 13.00 181.35
B 162.50 87.50 16,25 — 15.60 281.85
Turner
Welder D 93.60 87.50 4.68 — 13.00 198.78
Welder D 8 0.60 87.50 4.03 — 13.00 185.13
Mason D 72.80 87.50 3,64 ~ 13.00 176.94
Dresser D 78.00 87.50 3.90 — 13.00 182.40
B 169,00 87.50 16.90 — 15.60 289.00
Fitter
Fitter B 169,00 87.50 16.90 — 15.60 289.00
Aastt. Fitter /Khalasi. D • E0.60 87.50 4.03 — 13.00 185.13
Munshl D 75.40 87,50 3.77 — 13.00 179.67
1042 GI/82—5
4346 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, ] 982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]PRESENT
Grade
Rate of Pay
E. No. Name
Designation
Basic
D.A.
A.D.A,
PA.
H.A.
Total
MATES & MUNSHIS :
442 Sri Madan Pd. B 127.15 12.71 —
439 Sri Chandrama Singh B 122.23 12.22 —
388 Sd Fulan Lall C 110.79 11.OR
601 Sri Nanhakoo Nonia 103.55 10.36
205 Sri Badrl Pathak cB 127.15 12.72
820 Sri BHhwanath Pd. B 127,15 12.72
1489 Sri Rajcshwar Lall B 132.35 13.24
598 Sri Ramdeo Nonia D 91.91 4.60
1213 Sri Banarashi Singh B 142.75 14.28
B 127.15 12.72 —
E 76.70 — 1.R2
E 61.10 —
87.50
87.50
87.50
S7.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.30
87,50
87.50
87.50
87.50
15.60
15.60
13.00
13.00
15.60
15.60
15.60
13.00
15.60
15.60
13.00
13.00
960 Sri Jagadish Lall 754 Sri Jagarnath Pansari C5 Sri Madan Mohan P"th*k
242,96
237.55
222 37
214.41
242.97
242 97
248,69
197.01:
260.13
242,97
179.02
1*1.60
BLASTERS:
—
Khnlasi
— —
E fi
71.28
71.28
87.50
87.50
13,00
13.80
171.78
171.78
1711 Sri Mundrika Yadav
1714 Sri Chandradeo Ram
B.C. ROPEWAY
B.D.F./Khnlati
JI
172 Sri Nanhai Ahir 409 Sri Ayodhya Kahar 75 Sri Mukhdoo Ahir 83 Sri Sarjoo Chaudhary
D D D D E
0.60 — —. — —
Kh"lasi
1674 Klshun Mahto 1668 Sri Gulab Chand Miihto
82 Sri Banshi Kahar
E E D
93,60
93.33
89.17
88.22
71.28
71.28
76.70
81.16
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
4.68 4.67 4.46 4.41 — — — 4.06
—
Munshi
13.00
13.00
13,00
13,00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
1671 Sri Gobardhan Mahto
199.38
198.50
194.13
193.13
171.78
171.78
177,20
1S5.72
M.C. ROPEWAY
—
Khalasi Helper Khalasi
1.82 — —
it
76.70 76.70 71.28 71.28 77.00
E E E E D
87.50 87,50 S7.50 87.30 87 50
— — 3.85
158 Sri Ramchandra Mistry 119 Sri Anirudh Pathak 1670 Sri Meghnath Mahto 1687 Sri Mundrika Ahir 1673 Sri Karacshwar Sun"
13,00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
177.20 179.02 171.78 171.78 181,35
—
C D D D
99.09 93.60 93.33 82.63
87.50
87.50
87.50
87.50
9.91
4.68
4,67
4.13
13,00
13.00
13.00
13,00
113 Sri Gurudayal Ahir 126 Sri Karamdeo Mishrn 406 Sri Bandhoo Ahir 503 Sri Ganesh Singh
209.50
198.78
198.50
187.28
Asstt. Splicer/
B.D.F./Khalasi
Sarang/Splicer
Asstt. Operator
B.D.F./KhRlasi
Asstt. Splicer/
B.D.F./Khalasi.
Asstt. Opr.
B.D.F./Khalasi
— 0.60 482 Sri Ram Sumer Dubey 477 Sri Maheshar Ahir 77 Sri Sri Ram Pati Ahir
Khalasi
Jt
1749 Sri Sahdeo Singh Yadav 1683 Sri Sheonath Dusadh (Ram)
t>
Khalasi
t$
4.67 4.68 4.18 — — — — — —
93.33 93.60 83.60 71.28 71.28 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70
ft
ft
D D D E E E E E E E D
Munshi
71.28
81.16
87.50 87.30 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.30 87.30 87.50 87.30 4.06
13.00 198.50
13,00 199.38
13,00 188.28
— 13.00 171.78
— 13.00 171.78
122 Sri Mathura Dhobi — 13.00 177 20
489 Sri Ram Das Ahir — 13.00 177.20
325 Sri Sukhdeo Koiri 1.82 13.00 179,02
413 Sri Sarfudd inNawa — 13.00 177.20
1747 Sri Matar Chaudhary — 13.00 171.78
1724 Sri Lachhuman Chaudhary — 13.00 183,72
DRILLERS :
Driller
218 Sri Ram Brichh Nnwa D 0.60
1692 Sri Jitan Nonia tt D
677 Sri Gujjar Sheikh H D 1.48
624 Sri Kcsho Koeri n D
1728 Sri Dharmoo Ram It D
1729 Sri Jamuna Kurmi „
1730 Sri Kedarnath Ram tt
II
1*
1.48
93.60 87.30
83.40 87,30
93.60 87.50
93.45 87.50
83.40 87.50
D 83.40 87.30
D 83.40 87.50
D 88.94 87.50
D 93.60 87.50
Jt D 93.45 87.30
J1 D 93.45 87.30
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
833 Sri Bandhan Kandoo 962 Sri Raflque Sheikh lOlt Sri Sita Ram Dhobi 1170 Sri Dil Md. Sheikh
4.68 4.17 4.68 4.67 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.45 5.68 4.67 4.67
199.38
188.07
200.26
198.62
188.07
188.07
188.07
193.89
200.26
198.62
198.62
4347REVISED
Rate of Pay
Grade
Desis^'0"
Totc.l Rcm'irlcs
H A.
A.D A. P A.
D.A.
Bisic
A
Muto Mate M"te
Tj
14,30 — 13.00 — 11.70 — 11.05 — 13.00 13,00 — 13,65 —
').2b
B H p
JJ
14.30 —
13.00
15.60 260,40
15.60 246.10
15,60 231.80
15.60 224.65
J5.60 246.10
15.60 246.10
15 60 253.25
13.00 202,32
15.60 260.40
15.60 246.10
B
c 13.00 192.02
13.00 19202
8.32 -
8.32
143,00 87.50
130.00 87.50
117.00 87.50
110.50 87.50
130.00 87.50
Mftte 130.00 87.50
Mate 136.50 87.50
M'-tc 92.56 87,50
Munshi 87.50
143.00
Munshi 130 00 R7.50
Mate 83.20 87.50
M'-tc 83.20 87,50
C
MMe
p
13.00 13.00
192.02 192.02
8.32 —
8.32 —
R7.5O 87.50
83,20 83.30
c
Blaster BlMler
c
D
Hi- Onerator Asiit.Operv.tor/B.DF.
j)
"•
B D.F./KhaUsi
9.72 — 4.67 4,46 — 4.41 — 3.64 — 3.64 3.90
11.05 —
13.00 13.00 13.00 13 00 13.00 13.00 13.00 15.60
207.46 198.50 194.13 193.13 176.94 176.94 182.40 224.65
87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50
97.24 93.33 89.17 88.22 72.80 72."0 7 8.00 110.50
D D D B
Munshi
Black-smith B Smith/H, Mift/Khalf-si
3.90 3.90 — 3.64 3.64 8.32 —
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
182,40 182.40 176.94 176.94 192,02
87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50
7 8.00 78.00 72.80 72 .B0 83.20
D D D D C
Spliccr/B.D.F.
10.19
C
HI Operator/SpH-
9.72 — 9.72 — 8.79 —
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
212.61 207.46 207.46 197,17
87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50
101.92 97.24 97.24 87.88
Hd. Operator B'.l. Operator M i. Operator
Q
Hi-Operator Hd. Operator Asstt.Opr/B.DF' B.D.F/Klialisi
"
9.72 — 9,72 — 4.18 — 3.64 3,64 — 3.90 —
Line Gusiid
— 1.82 —. — —
13.00 1,3.0 0 13.00 13.00 13,00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13,00 15.60
ST. 50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50
11.05 —
207.46 207.46 188.28 176.94 176.94 182.40 177.20 179.02 177.20 171.78 224,65
97.24 97.24 83.60 72.80 72.80 78 00 76.70 76.70 76.70 71.28 110 50
D D D E E E E B
M'UVihi
Driller
202.32 192.02 202.32 202.32
•• "
" >• "
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
192.02 192.02 192.02 197.17 202.32 202.32 202.32
9,26 8.32 9.26 9.26 8.32 8.32 8.32 8.79 9.26 9,26 9.26
92.56 83.20 92 58 92.56 83,20 83.20 83.20 87,88 92 56 92.56 92.56
87,50 87.50 87,50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87 JO 87.50 87 50 H7.5O
C C c c c c c (' c c c
4348 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA77, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]SONE VALLEY PORTLAND CEMENT CO. LTD., LIMESTONE QUARRY.
PRESENT Rate of Pay
E.No. Nama Designation Grade
Bauc D.A. A,D.A. P.A. H.A. Total
507 Sri Sita Ram Dhobi Driller D 91.60 87.50 4.68 0,60 J3 00 199.38
508 Sri Bechan Dhanger lt D 91.60 87.-JO 4.68 0.60 13 00 199.38
1390 Sri Atal Bihari Singh Jt D 93.60 87.50 4.68 1.48 13.00 200.26
1472 Sri Jagoo Dhobi fJ n 85.20 87.50 4.26 13 00 189.96
1650 Sri Ram Hari Dusadh tJ D 79,01 S7 50 3.95 13.00 183,46
1648 Sri Surajan Kurmi n 79.01 "7 50 3.95 13.00 183.46
1613 Sri Immuddin Shoikh *j D 74.91 87.50 3.75 13 00 179.16
HELPER DRILLERS
635 Sri Narayan Kocri Loader Carrier £ 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
798 Sri Nanhkoo Koori L /C F 73.88 87,50 13.00 174.38
1108 Sri Bahori Koelh L/C E 76 70 87,50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1114 Sri Bishwanath Dhanfer L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1353 Sri Md. Hussen KJian L/C E 73.88 87,50 13.00 174.38
1474 Sri Ram Chandra Kahar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1644 Sri Sobarati Bhuia L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1542 Sri Nirmal Ahir L/C E 73.88 87,50 13.00 174.38
989 Sri Bilash Dusadh L /C E 76.70 87.50 1 82 13.00 179.02
1222 Sri Halkani Kahar L/C E 76.70 87.50 1,82 1J 00 179.02
1250 Sri Jagan Kahar L/C E 76.70 87.50 0.52 13.00 177 72
1261 Sri Khakhan Kahar L/C E 73.88 • 87,50 13.00 174 38
1264 Shri Budhan Kahar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1268 Sri Nngdeo Kahar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1291 Sri Aziz Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1296 Sri Tulsh Koiri L/C E 76.70 K7.5O 13,00 177.20
1297 Sri Gugul Ahir L/C F 76.70 87.50 0,52 13.00 177.72
1308 Sri Ganesh Aliir L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
]3r2 Sri Ram Bachan Mallsh L/C E 73.88 87.50 13,00 174.38
1330 Sri Halkani Bhuia L/C E 76.70 87.50 1 82 13.00 179.02
1338 Sri Sukhdeo Bhuia L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1342 Sri Bifan Bhuia L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1352 Sri Tapeshwari Dhobi L/C E 72.58 87.50 13.00 173.08
1356 Sri Ram Brichh Dhobi L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1366 Sri Basropan Ahir L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1396 Sri Sudhoo Bhuia L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179 02
1399 Sri Ganauri Kandoo L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1400 Sri Neyazuddin Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1405 Sri Radhey Lohar L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1415 Sri Neyamuddin Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 13.00 177.20
1427 Sri Dhanesher Chamar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1433 Sri Budhan Kahar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1436 Sri Ram Lakhan Koiri L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1466 Sri Ram ^Chandra Nonia L/C E 76.70 78.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1489 Sri Baudh Koiri L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 119 02
1475 Sri Ram Hari Kahar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1476 Sri Bandhoo Dhanager L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1480 Sri Amirka Kahar L/C E 73 88 87.50 13.00' 174.38
1481 Sri Sheo Nath Kahar L/C E 73. iS 87.50 13.00 174.38
1512 SriBhuneshwar'bubey L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1513 Sri Ram Jit Ahir L/C E 76.70 87 50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1516 Sri Dwarika Ahir L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13 00 179.02
1520 Sri Jagrup Chamnr L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 n.oo 179.02
1529 Sri Balkesher Ahir L/C E 76.70 87.50 13.00 177.20
1535 Sri Ram A"hray Bhuia L/C E 76.70 87 50 13 00 177.20
1562 Sri Frit Singh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179 02
1538 Sri Sarjoo Tirwari L/C E 73.8B 87.50 13.00 174.38
1568 Sri Suresh Kurmi L/C E 72.58 87.50 13,00 173.OS
1601 Sri Gafoor Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87,50 1.82 13,00 179.02
1625 Sri Budhoo Bhuia L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1631 Sri Kulicharan Dhanger L/C E 76 70 87,50 1,82 13.00 179,02
4349
REVISED
R^.tc of P,iy Remark*
DA- ADA- P.A. H.A. Total
Dwigniticm Giadc B '.sic
92,56 87.50 9.26 13.00 202.32
Driller C
c 92.56 87,50 9.26 13.00 202.32
r 92.56 87.50 9-26 13.00 202.32
RV20 87,^0 8.32 13.00 192.02
c
c 83.20 R7 50 8,32 13.00 192.02
83,20 R7.5O 8.32 13.00 192,02
c
c 83,20 87.50 8.32 13,00 192.02
r 76 70 87.50 1.S2 n.oo 179.02
DiUlinu Helper. L.C.
E 73.K8 87.50 13.00 174.38
76.70 S7.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
B
n 76.70 87.50 1.82 13,00' 179.02
73.88 87.50 J3.00 174.3B
E
73. HS 87.50 13,0() 174.38
E
h 73.88 87.50 13.00 174,38
E 73.8(5 87.50 13.00 174.38
}*. 76.70 87,50 1.82 13.00 179.0?
76.70 87,50 1 82 13,00 179.02
T.M./I..C.
E 76.70 87,50 0 52 13.00 177.72
° E 73,38 87.50 13.00 174.38
** E 73.88 87,50 13.00 174.38
*T
E 73.88 87.50 13,00 174 38
H
E 87.70 87 30 1.82 13.00 179.02
"4
E 76.70 87 50 13,00 177.30
13
E 76.70 87.50 0.52 13.00 177.7.;
•"• 13.00
E 73.88 87.50 174.38
£ 73.SS 87,50 13.00 174.38
E 76 70 87.,SO 1,82 13.00 179.02
b 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
E 72.58 87.50 13,00 J'73.08
H 73,83 87.50 13.00 174.38
If
¥ 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
E 76.70 87.50 1.12 n oo 179.02
E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00- 179.02
E 76.70 87.50 1.82 n oo 179,02
E 76.70 87.50 13,00 177.20
'*
V. 73.88 87.50 13,00 174.38
E 73,88 87,50 13.00 174.38
**
E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.3S
J>
E 76.70 87,50 1.82 13.00 179,02
It
E 76.70 87 50 1.82 13 00 179.02
**
t 73.88 87,50 n oo 174.38
E 73 88 87.50 13,00 174.3!
'*
E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
E 73,88 87 50 13.00 171,38
C 76.70 37.50 1,82 13.00 179 02
E 76.70 87.30 1,82 13.00 179..02
E 76.70 87.50 1,82 13 00 179.02
E 76.70 87,50 1 !2 13,00 179.0"'
V 76.70 87.50 13,00 177 20
E 76 70 87.50 13,00 177.20
E 76,70 87 50 1,82 13.00 I 79,02
E 76.70 S7.5O 13.00 174.38
E 72.58 87.50 13.00 173,08
E 76.70 87 50 1.82 13,00 179.02
E 76.70 B7.50 1,82 13.00 179,02
E 76.70 87,50 1.S2 13.00 179,02
• •
4^50__ THF GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PARI IT-SEC. 3(ii)]
PRESENT
B. No. Name Deiignation Grade Rate of Pay
Basic D.A. A.D.A. P.A. H A. Total
1649 Sri Rum Sunder Bhuift L/C E 73 88 87.50 13.00 174.3S
1172 Sri Hanir Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1173 Sri Tsmail Dhobi L/C E 76.70 87.50 1 82 13 00 179.02
859 Sri Tapeshwari Chanrnr L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
879 Sri Dhandeo Noni" L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
994 Sri Jahir Hussain L/C E 76.70 87,50 0.52 13.00 177,72
835 Sri Ram Chandra Nonia L/C F 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1007 Sri Sita Kahar L/C E 76.70 87.50 1 82 13.00 179,02
1041 Sri Ramu Ram Kahar L,C E 72 58 87.50 13.00 173.08
1134 Sn Anwar Khan L/C E 76.70 87.50 13,00 177.20
1112 Sri Latif Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
930 Sri Ram Adhar Dusadh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179,02
842 Sri Karirn Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 J79.O2
11J1 Sri Brichh Dusadh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
684 Sri Sarjoo Dhangcr L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
686 Sn Ram Deni Rajwar L/C E 76.70 S7.50 1 82 13.00 179.02
565 Sri Karim Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87,50 1.82 13.00 179.02
629 Sri Raj Kumar Dusadh L/C E 76.70 87,50 1.82 13.00 179.02
692 Sri Halkan Dusadh L/C E 76.70 87,50 1.82 13,00 179.02
685 Sri Hamid Shaikh L/C E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
795 Sri Modi Duiadh L/C E 76.70 87.50 13.00 174.38
756 Sri Ram Deni Dhanger L/C E 76.70 87.50 13.00 177.20
764 Sri Manuaroo Ahir L/C E 73.88 87.50 13,00 174.38
749 Sri Sheodayal Koiri L/C E 76.70 S7.5O 1.82 13,00 179.02
746 Sri Jangi Dusadh L/C E 76.70 S7.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
805 Sri Ram Joe Kori L/C E 73.88 87.50 13,00 174.38
721 Sn Hanif Shaikh L/C E 72 58 S7.50 13 00 173.08
850 Sn Ram Sc\.ak Nonia L/C r. 73 88 87.50 13.00 174,38
880 Sri Ram Aul&r Mallah L/C E 73.88 87 50 13.00 174,38
806 Sri Ram Autar Koiri L/C £ 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
797 Sri Nabi Ahmed Khun L/C E 73.88 87.30 13.00 174.38
646 Sri Bishwanath Dusadh L/C E 76.70 87.50 13.00 177.20
652 Sn linhwanath Kahar L/C E 73.88 87.50 13,00 c 174.38
791 Sn Kail Nonia L/C E 73.88 87.50 13,00 174.38
792 Sn IttJwr Dusadh L/C E 73.88 87.50 13 00 174.38
799 Sri Rojmohmcd Sheikh L/C E 83.88 87.50 13 00 174.38
1117 SriLachhu Kahar L/C E 76.70 87.50 1 82 13.00 179.02
C4 Sri Ram Bilas Nonia L/C E 61.10 87.50 .. .. 13.00 171.60
C7 Sri Wakil M. D. Khan L/C E 61.10 87.50 13.00 161.60
C24 Sn Oupieshwar Ram L/C E 61.10 87.50 .. 13,00 161.60
C41 Sn Han liar Koiri L/C E 61.10 87.50 13.00 161.60
1479 Gulabehand Dhohi L/C E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
TRAM LINE :
1731 SriTribcm Ram KMlasi E 71.28 S/.50 13,00 171.78
854 Sn Chhote Kolh L.C. E 73. S8 87.50 13.00 174.38
1537 Sri Jagp^t Kandoo L/C E 72.58 87.50 13.00 173.08
1577 Sri Ramcati NSUB L.C. E 73 88 87.50 13.00 174,38
HAULAGE DRIVER
1343 Sri Bnchh Bhuia L.C. E 73.88 87.50 13.00 174.38
1380 SriDukhi Ahir H.M. }' 76,70 87.50 10.1b 13.00 187.36
1514 Sri Ram Kiihun Ahir L.C. E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
1508 Sri Meghu Clicro L.C. E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179,02
1595 Sri Mahcsh Slnah L.C. E 76.70 S7.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
612 Sn Javnalu Sheikh L,C. E 76.70 87.50 1.82 13.00 179.02
4351
REVISED
Remarks
Rf\te of Pa>
Grtde
Dotignstion
Tatai
H A.
.A. P.A.
AD
Basic DA-
__i _ _—
••
T.M./L.C.
174.38 179.02
13.00 13.00
E B
1.82 1.82
13.00
••
::
E E E
•• ••
0.52 1.82 1.82
E £ E
u
g E
£
1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.E2 1 82
E E £
•• •• ••
p
••
i .m 1.82
4—
*>
E E p
87.30 87.30 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87 50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50 87.50
71.88 76.70 76.70 73.88 73.88 76.70 76.70 76.70 72.58 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 76.70 7(5.70 76.70 73.88 76,70 76.70 73,88 72.58 73.88 73.88 73.88 73.88 7fl.70 73.88 73.88 73.88
E
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13,00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13,00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13 00 13.00 13,00 13,00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
179.02 174.38 174.38 177.72 179.02 179.02 173.0! 177.20 179.02 179.02 179.02 179.02 179.02 179.02 179,02 179.02 179.02 179.02 174.38 177.20 174.38 179.02 179.02 174.38 173.08 174.38 174.38 174.38 174.38 177.20 174.38 174.38 174.38 174.38
87.50
73.88
E
*•
13.00 179.02
1.82
87.50
76.70
E
13.00 161.60
87.50
61.10
E
13.00 161.60
87.50
61.10
E
13,00 161.60
87.50
61.10
L
13.00 161.60
87.50
61.10
E
13.00 174.38
87.50
73.88
E
3.51
87.50
70.20
T.L. Mate/K.hala"i Tramline Khalasi
174.21 174.38 173.08
13.00 13.00 13.00
13.00 174.38
87.30 87.50 87.50
73.88 72.58 73,88
D B E E
Haulage Driver
176.94 187.S6
n.oo 13.00
D D 1)
R7.50 87.50 87.50 87.50
D 13
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
179,67 179,67 179.67 179.67
3 64 4.16 3.77 3.77 3.77 3.77
87.50 87.50
72.80 &3.20 7?. 40 74i.4O 75,40 75.40
13
. ~
4352 THE GAZETTE OF TNDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Annexurc 2 J 3 2 Statement cf persons to be t >fc.'rt on perm'.nvnt roll w.e.f
61 . Rislriiddiri Shi Ikh Gulzar Sheikh
M-7K
62 . Rnmji Ahir Dukhan Ahir
Sl. Name Father's mmc 63 . Krishrr.. ChoiU'hry DiODAndPn ChoUdbry
No. 64 , B'UkKhuu Koiri
Ramtjeni Koiri
1 •v 61 , Ginfiii Noni.Li" BhiktvriNinm
3
66. . Mukhdcoo Dusadh Tula Dusadh
I. Sh :uk''\r N '.th Ciuttawj Blioltmth Chfittfejfj
67, Mangaru Ahir Firangi Ahir
D.K.SvkU B.N. SukU
68 Hanif Sheikh Abdul Sheikh
3 Rnikum'.i Run Eadri Rnm
n9 Kasarat Kumhar Shcodhnni Kumhar
4. K".tneshwjr Pd. Sinliu Ambik" Pci.
70. Laxman Teli Keshwar Teh
.1. Rnjkurmr Ram Rnm NJrcsh R-m
71. Sitaram Dhobi Sunder Dhobi
6. M uioh ir Stwrm i LP.xn-i ShintiT
72. Shco Nonia Teni Nonia
7. NlrnviYnlav Gumdiiyr.l Al.ir
73. Lepa Dhangor Legan Dhangcr
8. Rim Sub-ish Ydduv Balrul Ahir 74.
Satnundri Bhuin Nirpat Bhuian
9. SlUar Sheikh Sn koor Sheikh
75. Deosaran Dhangar Bihari Dhangar
JO Mihiuddiu Khun Hiap.y.'t Khtin 76. Ramdas Kumhar Seodhani Kumhar
11. L"\umanKch(,r j h u l m K a h ar 77. Mansoor Khan Wali Khan
12 BJgyn Loh.ir ChsriUr Lohar 78. Chhathu Dhangar Sukhai Dhangar
13. I/uuimnDiwih RnmdbitmDusiJh 79. Chandrika Ahir Dhanpat Ahir
14. Ctr.rilar Nonia R'ighun-'.nd.in Nonia 80. Sarfu Khan Zarif Khan
15 Ghoghiu K.dur Mihideo K :h"r 81. Balkesar Dhangar Deo Dhangar
16 Tribhuw MI Mishra pisar.ith Misltrd 32. Rsmlagan Nonia Anantu Nonia
17 Nanhkoo Misl'r.i R"ji Mishri 83. Dhurbhlkshan Koiri Jagdeo Koiri
18. Qopd.] R im Rupaeo Dusuclh 84. Charltar Nonia Pragash Nonia
19. Sahodai Khun Hjdjyat Khan 85. , Rajia Dhangrin Kalicharan Dhnnga
20. G '.Hiuri Ru.jw.ir Lochi Rjjw.ir 86. Suraju Chamar Kesar Chamar
21 Kiiramdeo Kulur Khf.doran K.ilur 87. Ramjit Kahar Mehang Kahar
22. Mohd. N Mm Klmu Wah^bKhin 88. Chhathu Chamar Khelawan Chamar
23. SirfuddinHussuin Amil Hussein S9. Kawalpati Chcrin Sabhlkhan Chero
24. Sulennn Amari S^htnlr Ansari 90. Kesar Chamar Langatn Chamar
25. Gainuri Nii Dukhan Nai 91. Mohan Ahir Dowan Ahir
26 Ram Subliag Ahir 92. Ramchela Yadav Ramdas Ahir
Matar Ahir
27. BhWtKntmr 93. Rajia Bhuin Mangru Bhuian
RaBhimnncinn Kahar
28. G.unuri K tnau 94 Narain Ahir Dhanuiki Ahir
Rfjnkhelawan Kand u
29 95. Kutubuddin Answi Janabu Ansari
Hukam Ahir Bhr.dai Ahir
96. Jngdish Teli Ramdas Teli
30 Charitar Dhobi Rimdco Dhobi
97. Dcobans Kumhar Bahadur Kumhar
31. Ramchander Dusndh Jaw-ihir Ram
98. Kawlapalia Bhuin Janan Bhuian
32. Brichh Ahir Janu Ahir
99. Kabutri Bhuin Ram Pd. Bhuian
33. Fakirfl Ahir Jnduni Ahir
100. Nazir Sheikh Nimma Sheikh
34. Nand Ahir Jeduni Abir
101. Bigan Rajwar Sewak Rajwar
35. Bclash Ahir Sukhdco Ahir 102. Sitaram Dusadh
Tulii Dusadh
36. Bandhan Dhobi Dina Baitha 103. Koloiya Dhangrin Janki Dhangar
37. AchrmibarRam Dhanukdhari Ram 104. Parmesar Ahir Tulsi Ahir
38. Bhola Kr.nau GanauriSdh 105. Bftgeshur Kahar Baldeo Kabar
30. KutubuddinDafrtli DargahiMisn 106. Ramkisun Kahar Seotahal Kahar
40. Hizirat Gulkhan Mohd. Gulkhan 107. Jaishri Dhobi Akalu Dhobi
41. Rttrnbriksh Ram TapcBhari Dusadh 108. Ghuman Rajwar Nanhai Rajvvar
4 2. Jajgobind Ram Kesho Thttkur 109. RaghuramBhiuan Bhagelu Bhutan
43. Mohd. Rtsoal Sheikh Kabcddin Sheikh 110. Kesar Dhangar Jhari Dhangar
44. Jagdish Dhangar Bonshi Dhangar 111. Deonarain Lai Saraju Lai
45. RalakhanY.idav Rftmsaran Yudav 112. Sahdeo Ahir Jokhan Ahir
46. Bindesari Cham ir G ariban Charaar 113. Lechhuman Chamor Deonath Chamar
47. Indr.idoo Ram R am Sewak Ram 114. BIpat Chamar Nanhak Chamar
48. Sulcm'-n Ansari Roj Mohd, Mian 115. Babulal Dusadh Chandrl Dusadh
49. Tribcni Thakur Minting Thakur 116. Blbhan Dhpngar Mahabir Dhangar
50. Saraju Thakur Muneshar Thakur 117. Saudftgar Gareri Ramjatan Gareri
51. Dcodhaji Mahato Ghinahu Mnhato 118. Rambriksh Kahar Jaiiri Kahar
52. Dcwa Singh Keshwar Singh 119. Shyambihar Chamnr Basudeo Chamar
53. Rprasundur Y.idav Balrup Yadav 120. Rambelas Dhangar Rarryit Dhangar
54. Uma Kant Dubcy Girjft Dubey 121. Parmesar Dusadh Lakhpat Dusadh
55. GopalRam Rasusaran Yfldav 122. Ramjanam Bhuian Bhagan Bhuian
56. Ayoahya Sliigh RBmgrihi Singh 123. Alimuddin Sheikh Chheda Sheikh
57. Sri Klshore Singh Muneshwar Singh 124. Abdul Khaliquo Istahak Khan
58. TekB.ihadur Dor Bahadur 125. Sheonftth Pandey Bonimadho Pandey
59. Yam Bahadur Pagbir Gurung 126 Raman Ahir Bhuletan Ahir
60. Rajendra Nonia Parmcsar Nonia 127. Ram Pd. Dhangar Sukar Dhangar
4353
3
1
2
3
1
2
Naurans Kahar
. Jirmania Dhangiin . Ghura Chamar . Ramkirit Dhangar , Matukhdharl Nonia . Blrbal Kandu . Lachhuman Koiri . Bhaglrathi Ahir , Nageshar Dhangar , Radheshyam Kumhar . Jagdish Chamar
Nizaimuddin Sheikh Pargas Ahir Mundrika Ahir Aijun Koiri Bisnath Sahu Baleihwar Kolh Ramnath Koiri Dasarath Thakur Mukhlal Kofri
, Ramprawesh Towari , Kamaldeo Koiri
Pargas Koiri Sukhlal Koiri Satyanarain Ram Chandradip Ram JasodwaBhutn
. Dhomuks Dusadh
Bajia Dhangar
, Eheo Koiri . Blnod Bihari , SudamaRam RamkritAhlr Kail Bhuian Rambriksh Kahar
, Patia Duiadhin Kailash Dusadh Tilakdhari Dhangar
, Ramsowak Ram , Rajmohan Koiri , Ramjanatn Koiri . Harihar Mahto . Jibasia Bhuin . Tlkhuri Nonialn , Roj Mohd. Sbeikh , Ramiakhan Nonia , Prithwi Ram . Motichand Dhobi . Nathuni Shefkh . Mohd. Hassan . Rambelash Nonia . Madan Mohan Pathak . Ramchander Nonia . Waldl Mohd. Khan . Jirwa Bhangrin . Budhla Chamatn . Ganesh Bhuian . Ramchander Bhuian , Manmatia Dhangrln . Karami Dhangrin . Rajkumar Chero . Ramjanam Rajwar . Panu Dhangar . Budhan Dusadh . Ramadhar Kanda . Kapildeo Singh . Gupteshwur Ram
Ghura Kahar Jagarnatb LaJ Hajrat Mir Khan Ramkeshwar Thakur Jalsri Miitri Krishna Lohar
Srinath Kahar Moti Lai Sadamlr Khan Jamuna Thakur Rajmohan Sharma DiHp Kumar
195. 196. 197. 198. 199, 200.
[No. L-29011/57/74—L.R. IV/D. ni (B)]
KANWAR RAJINDER SINGH. Under Secy.
New Delhi, the 1st December, 1982
SO. 4216.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Indui- trial Disputes Act 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Govern- ment hereby publishes the following award of the National Industrial Tribunal, Bombay on a complaint from the work- man under section 33(A) of the said Act, which wag received by the Central Government on the 24th November, 1982.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT BOMBAY
Complaint No. NTB-5 of 1980
(Ariainjt out of Reference No. NTB-1 of 1980)
PARTIES:
Ramsagar Shivlal Harijan, Bindu Bangla, S. V. Road, Ville Purie CWett) Bombay-400056.
.. .Complainant
Versus
Air-India, Air-India Building, Nariman Point, Bombay-400021.
. .. Opposite Party.
APPEARANCES:
For the complainant—Mr. M. B'. Anchan, Advocatr For tho opposite party—Mr. B. P. Iirani, Advocate.
INDUSTRY : Airlines, STATE : Maharashtra
Bombay, the 14th day of October, 1982
AWARD
This is a complaint filed by the complainant under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, againit the oppo- site party, Air-India, Bombay.
2. The complainant alleged that he was employed as a loader in the Cargo Department of the opposite party since January. 1973 at Santa Cruz Airport. On 18th October, 1976 he was charged for the alleged stealing of a parcel containing some solution worth Rs. 5 from the mail bag at Muil Sec- tion. A complaint was lodged with tho Police and the Police filed a criminal case against him in the Court of the Metro- politan Magistrate, 22nd Court at Andheri, Bombay. The learned Magistrate by hig order dated 21st June, 1977 con- victed the complainant under Section 381 of the I.P.C. and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment till the riling of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs, 200. The complainant preferred criminal revision application in the Court of Ses- sions, Greater Bombay. This application was dismissed and tho conviction wai confirmed.
Balkesar Kahar Bechan Dhangar Sobnath Cham"r Lagan Dhangar Ramprit Nonl* Nathuni Kendu Bhajan Koiri Jhulani Ahir Ramdhani Dhangar Raghunandam Kumhar Manger Chamar Rahmat Sheikh Aniwas Ahir Laldhani Ahir Brichh Koiri Jaga Sahu Janki Kolh Sukhatl Koiri Ramdeni Thakur Fakira Kofri Damodar Tewiri Sukhari Mahto Dukei Koiri Fakira Koiri Ramklsnu Ram Munshi Ram Ramsunder Bhuian Ramdni Dusadh Ramdhani Dhangar Jagroop Koiri Jagnarain Ram Dhanukdhari Ram Dukhi Ahir Sukhdeo Bhuian Chhakauri Kahar Blsunath Dusadh Sahdeo Duiadh Mangar Dhangar Sita Dusadh Sadhuni Koiri Rupu Koiri Ramdas Koiri Sukan Bhuian Akalu Nonia Sarfud in Sheikh Sunder Nonia Kail Ram Girdhari Dhobi Kasim Shoikh Abdul Sheikh flasudco Nonia Bhola Pathak Budhu Nonia Gulam Rasul Khan Karamdoo Dhangar Chandcrdeo Chamar Sohrai Bhuian Jethu Bhuian Dasarath Dhangar Balesar Dhangar Sabhikhan Chero Hari Rajwar Kesat Dhanfiar Briclih Dusadh Sita Kandu Janki Singh Amirchand Kahar
128. 129 130, 131, 132, 133 134. 133 136, 137, 138, 139, 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147, 148. 149, 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158, 159. 160. 161. 162. 163 164. 165. 166 167. 168 169, 170 171, 172, 173, 174 175, 176 177. 178. 179, 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194
1042 GI/82—6
3. The complainant alleged that when he was charged for the alleged theft he wai told by the Departmental Head that he will be taken back on duty if he succeeded in the cri- minal case. The complainant approached the officer after his conviction in tho criminal court. He was told that since he has been convinced he will not be taken back on duty. The complainant submitted that opposite party hai not charged him for the. said rnitconduct under the Service Re- gulations nor a snow-6flu"e notice was issued to him as re- quired under rules. His removnl from service is therefore against the principles of natural Justice, mala fide and illegal. At the time of his illegal removal Reference No. NTB-1 of 1980 wai pending before this Tribunal and the complainant wa" concerned in that dispute. The complainant therefore alleged that fie opposite party has committed breach of
4354 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER. 18, 1982'AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)lSection 33 of the Idustrial Disputes Act. The complaiant therefore prayed that this Tribunal be pleased to decide the complaint and pass orders thereon rcinitatine him with full buck wngea and continuity of service.
4. The opposite party. Air-India, filed its wiitten itate- ment on 3 lit Ma;ch, 1982, pleading as follow*. The com- plainant wit* a casual worker doing work of a casual nature in the- cavgo section of the opposite party Ht Santa C r ut Bombay, He used to work only on suuh days when hii ser- vices were required by the opposite party and that loo only if ho mndo huni-elf available for work on those day". There wai no obligation on him to present himself for work on any pr.iticul.ir d'.y or tbyi. Similarly, there was no obligation on the opposite pdrty to engaged him for duty on any dny or days on which he might preterit hlmBelf for work. On 18th October, 1976 he was arrested by the Police on a charge of theft. The opposite party therefore decided not to engage him thereafter for casupl work. The opposite paity was not bound or llfcble to given any work to the complainant. Thus, there haj been TIO removal from servica aH alleged by tho com- plainant. There was no reference pending before this Tii- ounal on 191h October, 1976, from which date the com- plainant wt;" not given work. In these circumstances, there was no question of applying for approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Acl. There wos no bicach of the provision1! of Section 33 and consequently no com- plaint enn lie binder Section 33A. The opposite party pointed out that tho order of reference pertaining to Reference No. NTE-l of 19H0 was made on 29th January, 1980, and the alleged action of removal from service took place before the said reference wai made by the Central Government to thu Tribunal. Consequently, there wns no question of mfik- ins an approval application. It was denied that the com- plainant was employed as a loader as alleged by him. There was no question of taking him back on duty since he was only a ca"ual worker. There was also, according to the oppo- site party, no question of the opposite party having charged him with misconduct. The complainant being a casual wor- ker it was at the option of the opposite party to assign to him or not to asign to him duties on any particular day or days. His not being assigned duties after 18th October, 1976, doe" not according to the opposite party amount to hit removal from service.
5. The complainant had engaged the services of on Advo- cate. On 14lh October, 1982 which was the date of hearing of this complaint, Mr. Anchan, (he learned counsel for the complainant. Informed this Tribunal in writing that the com- plainant did not want to prosecute further Thii complnlnt and that he be allowed to withdraw the same. It was prayed that an award may be made accordingly disposing of thii complaint.
6. According to the poinpiaiimnt, the complaint arose out of reference No. NTB-1 of 1980. The opposite party hw pointed out tint the order of reference pertaining to the said reference is dated 29th January, 1980. Even on the admission of the complainant he was not given work from 18th October, 1976 or thereabout. On that day, he was charged for the alleged theft of the article mentioned in the complaint. He wan convicted by the learned Magistrate on 21st June, 1977. It is the contention of the opposite part* that the complainant was a casual labourer, and that the opposite party was not bound or liable to jive any work to the complainant. No work wai given to him after he wai found to have committed theft of some article from the mail bsg at Mail Section. The Reference No. NTB-1 of 1980 was obviously not pending when the complainant ac- cording to him was removed from tho -service. According to the opposite pnrty, as he was a casuni labourer there wai no question of removal. For all these reasons there it no merit in this complaint. The complaint is therefore liable to be rejected.
7. My award accordingly. No order •" to costf.
M, D. KAMBT.T, Presiding Officer [No. L-11014(l)/82-D.TT(B)] B. S. PRA8HER, Dtric Often New Delhi, the 1st December, 1982
'S.O. 4217.—Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so required had, in pursuance of the provision of sub-clause (vi) of clause (n> of "ection 2 of the Industrial Disputes Aci, 1947 (14 of 1947), declar- ed by tho notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour No. S. O. 2194 dated the 27-5-1982 the iron ore mining industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the "aid Act, for a period of six month*, from the 4-6-1982;
And whereas, the Central Government ii of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub-clause (vi) of clause (n) of section 2 of th* Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), tie Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public utility service for the purposes of the said Act, for ft further period of six months from the 4-12-1982.
[No. S-U017(8)/81-D. I (A))
NAND LAt, Under fcey.
New Delhi, the 6lh December, 1982
S.O. 4218.—Tn exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 5 Jf the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Taro Ssnkar Mukherjee as Inspector of Mines subordinate to the Chief Inspector of Mines.
IF. No. A-12025/1/81-MI)
4355S.O. 4219.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (I) of section 5 nf the Mint}, Act, 1952 (35 of 1952), the Central Government hereby appoints Sliri R. Ramachan- dran as Inspector of Minci mboidinate to the Chief Inspec- tor of Mine*.
[F. No. A-12O25/4/81-MI]
]. K. J A I K j U n te l ew
New Delhi, the 6th December, 1982
S.O, 4220.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 uf 1947), the Central Government herebv Dublishes the followinjj a^vard of the Ccufr.il Govern- ment Industrirtl Tribunal, Ahmednbad in the industrial dis- pute between the employers in relation t0 the Bank of Baroda, Ahmedabad and their woikmcn, which wa*i riteived by the Central Government on the 27-11-82.
BEFORE SHR1 Q. S. KAROT, PRESIDING OFFICER,
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (CENTRAL) AT
^HMEDABAD.
Reference (1TC) No. 3 of 1987.
Adjudication
BETWEEN
Th* Manajemcnt of Bank of Baroda, Ahmedabad
AND
Their workmen.
In the matter termination of services of Shn I G.
Shth.
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Dtlhi, have, vide their Order No. L-U012/160/80;L IUA) dated February, 1982, rtferred for my adjudication the industrial disnute between tho management of Bank of Baroda aj'd their workmen, under Sec. 10(lXd) of the Industrial Dis- pute* Act. 1947. The dispute relates to the matter specified in th; Schedule appended to the said Q.tter, viz :—
"Whether the ac.kn of tho management of Bank of Baroda, Renion.il Office, Ahmedabad, in terminat- ing the services of Shri 1. G. Shah with cfl'cct from 7-6-73 is lcsai and justified 7 If not, to what relief the workman i* entitled and from what date ?"
2. It appears mat usual notices were issued to the turtle*. Shri I. G. SbaJi, tlie workman concerns 1, filed hi" statement in support of his case for reinsn'cment in service with full back wages and the matter was pending for filing of the statement by the m.MaijemcnT of Bank of Bir -'. However, on 29-10-R2. tin; lrsitws ilatjd that they htu* arrived at an amicabk settlement m this matter, and that therefore this reference be disposed of in term* of their settlement Going through the settlement lubmiitsd bv the parties, it appear* to me that it i" jwrt, 'air and reasonable and in the interest cf the Workman concerned. I, therefore, taVe th? settlement on record at Ex. 8 and make award in terms of Ex R which i* annexed hereto and marked Annexurc 'A'. Confldr.rinR the circumstances of this case. I direct the management of Bank of Baroda to pay Rr 75 by way of costs of fhw ftaltei.
G. S. BAROT, Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE 'A'
FORM-H
Name of parties :
H*TH"ratlnj Employer.—Mr. A. J Menewt, Reajonal
Manager, B.ink of Baroda. Kaira Reg-on, Opp. ; Income Tax Office, Ahmedabnd-380014.
Repre":nUng Uit workman—Mr. K. R. Mehta, AuthorU- ed Representative, Maiinpor Chakla, Gamdhi Sheri, Dabhoi-391110,
SHORT RHCfTAL ofc CASE
Tho Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, vide it* order No. L 12012/lfiO/8O-D JI(A), dated 8th Febmary 1982 referred the Industrial Dispute over alleged illegal termination of services of Shri I. G. Shah w.e.f. 7th Tune W3 tmloie the inOmtiMl Tribunal, Ahraedabad-T, Tb" combined workman Sliri 1 G. Shah, filed his statement of claim before the Hon'ble Indmtridl Tribunal, Ahmedabad. Durinn the pcnilcney of the claim before the court, negotia- tions we;e going on between both the partie* mentioned abovo for oniicttble settlement of aforeraid Industrial Dispute. The rartici hav^ now settled the dispute at follows :
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
1. The Management of Bunk of Haroda will reinstate Shri I. G. Shah residing at Barodu a" an confirmed employee on starting brsic salary of Rs. 360 p.m. ait per the Third Bipartite Settlement with continuity of nervice with erfrct from 12-5-1972.
2. The terms of the Settlement will be implemented/ come into operation on completion of one month from the date of signing of this Settlement "ubject to the following :
(") Shri I. G. Shah is found medically fit;
V1
(b) Shri T. G. Shah agrees that hit, absorption as stated above is in full and final tettlement of all his claims aj^intf th; Bank.
(c) Shri I. G, Shah will not claim any back wnjje" and other cotwequftnifal benefit) like l#ave, medi- cal aid etc.
(d) Shri I. G. Shah aive" an undertaking not to claim any special allowance for a period of five years from the date of his absorption.
fc) Shri T, G. Shah agrees to withdraw all his representations in the matter made to the various authorities under the Low.
Rcpieitnting Workman
(K. R. MEHTA) Representinc Employer. Authoiire-u Rci;resenta'ive (A. J. Menezei)
Witnesses "-
1. Shri S. lit. Nayjik, Regional Manager
2, Mif" S. B. Aryu KaJn Refiion
Dais.—29th October 1S82. Ahmedaba*.
Place.- -Ahmedabod.
[No. L 12012/160/80-D. II (A)]
SO, 4221.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Deputes Act. 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government herebv publishes the following award of thi Central Govern- ment ' Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, in the industrial ™P"t" bctwMD the employers in relailon to the Punjab .and hind Bank Bombay and ihelr workmen* which W"R received by the Central Govermrent 01 the 29th Novtmbar, \9S1.
4356 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL No. 2, BOMBAY.
PRESENT :.
Shri M. A. De"bpande, Presiding Officer
Reference No. COIT-2/9 of 1982
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to tho Management of Punjab
& Sind Bank.
AND
Their Workman
APPEARANCES :
For the Employer.—Shri D. 0. Sanghvi, Advocate (2) Shri
Ranjit Singh, Officer,
For the workman—(1) Shri Surindcr Singh Bali, President
Punjab & Sindh Bank Employees' Union, <2) Shri
Gopal Sharma fWorkman in person).
INDUSTRY : Banking
STATE : Maharashtra
Bombay, the 11th November, 1982
AWARD
By their order No. .L-12012/214/81-D. II(A) dated 25-1-1982 the Centra] Government have referred the follow- ing dispute for adjudication under Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 :—
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab ft Sind Bank in relation to their Masjid Bunder Branch, Bombay in terminating th" service* of Shri G. B. Sharma, Peon with effect from the 2nd May, 1979 is justified ? If not to what relief la the workman concerned entitltd to?"
2. As is evident from the order of reference, the reference relates to the termination of the services of Shri G. D. Sharma, peon with effect from 2-5-1979. What is referred li to find out whether the said termination order is justified and if not what relief can bo extended to the workman. Tho matter ha* been espoused by tho Union on behalf of the workman and th© Union as well n" the management havo reached at a settlement wheieby on making a freih applica- tion for appointment on probation as a Peon, the Bank has Mured to consider the prayer and in fact it haa been already given. It is true that had the matter been contested and had the matter been decided in favour of the workman ho would have got far more than the reliefs which he is getting under the settlement Yet the parties it seems have decided that Instead of leaving the matter to the vagaries of law better come to the term" of settlement. The Union ha* cerifled the terms of scttlemem a* just, fair and reasonable with which endorsement I fuUy agree on going through the relief offered to the cashiered peon. Ther settlement ia reasonable, fair and proper and order can be passed in term* thereof. Award is mad© accordingly. No order as to cost*.
SdA
Dated to. 17-11-82. M> A" D E S H P A N D E- ***** °ffl"r BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. II, BOMBAY.
Reference (CG1T No. 2/9 of 1982
BETWEEN
Management-of Punjab & Sifld Bank
AND Thtir Workmen
Memorandum of Settlement on behalf of Punjab k Sind Bank in response to the proposal received from the workman.
May it please the Honourable Tribunal—
SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE
Whorcaa Sh. Gqpal Dutt Sharma was given a appointment of a Temporary Peon at B/o Masjid Bunder, Bombay for the period 27-5-1978 to 26-6-1978, 29-6-78 to 28-8-78 &. 1-9-78 to 31-10-78.
And whereas Sh. Gopal Dutt Sharma was taken on probation into the service of the bank at it* Musjid Bunder branch w.e.f. 3-11-78 as a Peon. And whereai Sh, G. D- Sharma was not confirmed in bank's service and was inform- ed vide letter dt. 2-5-79 to that effect.
And whereas Sh. G.D. Sharma raised an industrial dispute on his nonconfirmation which was subsequently referred to Central Govt, to CGIT, Bombay for adjudication which is still pending.
Whereas Sh. G. D, Sharma has represented to the bank vide his letter dt. 20-10-82 and has requested for a fresh employment in the Bank. The parties have mutually agreed to settle the dispute in the following term*.
Terms of Settlement :
1. That the management has agreed as a gesture of good- will to offer fresh appointment at a Peon to Sh. G. D. Sharma on probation for a period of six month* at branch office.
2. That Sh, G. D. Sharma will make an application for
fresh appointment on probation as a P^on with tho Bank.
3. That Sh. G. D. Sharma has agreed that his fresh ap- pointment will be new and he will not be entitled to for any claim/benefit monetary or otherwise for the past service rendered by him with the bank.
4. That Sh. G. D,. Sharma has agreed that he will not claim any back wages or claim any compensation nor the continuity of service with the bank for his service rendered previously i,e. prior to 10-11-82.
5. That in view of this settlement the employees has agreed not to raise any dispute of whatsoever in nature about his past service with the bank and will not claim any relief whatsoever from civil courts, Labour Courts/Tribunal /Con- ciliation Office or any other authority.
fi. That the CGIT Bombay where the dispute is pending would be requested by the parties to give an Hward in terms of this settlement.
For the Workmen :
For the Mana"ement :
Witne" :
1. Sd[- illigiblc
2. Sd|- Hliglble
S d I" m*M<
[No. 1.-12012(214)/81-D. D (A)] N. K. VERMA, Desk Officer
4357New Delhi, the 6th December, 1982
S.O. 4222.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that the minimum rates of wage* should be fixed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (11 of 1948) In respect of the employment in Hematite mines;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power? conferred by Section 27 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of it" intention to add the mid employment to Part 1 of the Schedule to the said Act.
Any suggestion* or objections which may bt received from any person in rapect of the said addition on or before the expiry of a period of three montha from the date of publication of thi" notification in the official Gazette, will be considered byi the Central Government.
[No. S-32O17/3/82-WC(MW)] M. L. MEHTA, Under Secy.
4358 THE QAZETTF, OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART n—Snc. 3(ii)]New Delhi, the 6th December, 1982
5.O. 4123—Jn pursuance or" section 10 of ,the Iron Ore Mines and Manganese Oie Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1976 (61 of 1976), the Central Government hereby publish the following report of the, activities financed under the said Act, during the year ending the 3Ut March, 1982 together with a statement of account* for that year.
PART I
(a) General.—The lrcn Ore Mines Labour Welfare Cent AcU 1961 waj enacted to provide for levy and collection of (.ess on Iron Ore for finnnuuf activities to promote the Welfare of She labour working in the Iron Ore Mining indus- try. The Act cume into fores on the lit October, 1963 and was extended to the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu on the 1st October. 1964. The pfore"aid Act ha" been replaced by the Iron Oie Mines end Manganese Ore Mines Labour Welfare Gets Ac:, 1976 (55 of 1976) and tht Iron Ore Mitten nod Manganese Ore- Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1976 (61 of 1976). The new Act* provide for the levy of a cess at a rale not exceeding one rupee per metric tonne of iron ore and rupees six r>er metric tonne on manganese ore exported or consumed internally, The rate of, levy on iron ore has been increased from 25 pal"e' per metric tonne to 50 paioe per metric tonne with effect from 1-7-81. The present rat* of levy on rnangane"e ore is Re. 1 per metric tonne. The proceeds of the ce*s ara milined mainly for improvement of public health end ianiu- tion, prevention of diieaw*, provision end Improvement of
4359(ii) Housinjt Ficilitim.—Provision o£ hoiuing acoonraaodi. tion for iron ore and aungaucie ore miner* li one of Uja main activities of ths organisation. There ore thrcei icbem* viz. ;—
educational facilities, medical fucilitk*, hoaiuia and w"ter iupply schemes, amelioration of social conditions, provision ol recreational faciiitiv* etc. The Welfare facilities cover workers employed directly or thrmujb contractorv.
(i) Low Cost Housing Scheme (Type I),
(ii) N(,w Housing Scl SITIC (Type U),
(ui) Build Your Own House Scheme.
2. The c"ss i" levied a" a diitv of customs on the iron otc and manganese ore exported, and &i a duty of excise on iron oie and man£1) collection charges.
4360 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]S.O. 4226.—Whereas it appear* to th" Gentral Government that the employer and the majority of the employee* in re- lation to the establishment known as Messrs K.L.M. Engine- ering Enterprise*, C-13 Industrial Estate, BeIgaum-8, have agreed that tho provisions of the Employees' Provident Fund* and Miscellaneous Provision* Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of ection 1 of the said Act, the Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provisions of the snid act to the said establishment
[No. S-35019 (471)|82-PF. II]
New Delhi, the 25th November, 1982
S.O. 4224.—Whereas it appean to the Central Government that tho employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Measrg Ch. Satyanarayant (B.E.) Contractor, 45-35-29, JagannadhApuram, Visakhapata- nani-16, have agreed that the provisions of the Employe**" Provident Fund* and Miscellaneous Provision* Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the "aid establishment;
Now, therefore, in werciie of the power* conferred by •ub-iection (4) of Section 1 of the taid Act, the Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provision* of the said act to tha said establishment.
[No. S-35019(473)/82-PF. II]
S.O. 4227,—Whereas it appears Uy the Central Government •that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Agricultural Im- plements Manufacturer* and Suppliers, Virupaksha Krupa, Vidya Nagar, HubliL21, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the laid establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred t>y "ub-"ectlon (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provisions of the said act to the said establishment.
[No. S-35019-<470)l82-PF. m
S.O. 4225.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known us Meura Montgomery's Hotel, 108, Sarojini Devi Road, Secundcrabad, have agreed that tho provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella- neous Provision! Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made ap- plicable to tho mid establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power* conferred by "ub-"cction (4) of Section 1 of the laid Act, the' Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provision* of the said act to the taid establishment.
[No. S-35019{472)/82-PF. II]
S.O. 4228.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Hamsaveni Spin- ners, Government of India Picas Colony, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-19, have agreed ihat the provisions of the Em- ployees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be mad© applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provision* of the said art to tho sard Mtablithment,
fNo. S-35019 (469)|82-PF. H]
4361S.O, 4231.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in tela- tion. to the establishment known as Messrs Quinn India Limit- ed, 3-6-3O7|l, Hyderagnda, Hyderabad-1 including its branch at 17, Ormes Road, Kilpauk, Madras-10, have agreed that the provisions of the Employf.es' Piovident Funds and Miscel- laneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952). should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power* conferred by sub- slction (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment heieby applies the provision! of the said act to the "aid establishment.
INo. S-35O19(467)/S2-PF. Ill S.O. 4229.—Whereas it nppeiirs to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Confab Engineers, 73, Lattice Bridge Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Madras-41, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said ejtablishment;
Now, therefort, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provisions of the said act to the said establishment.
[No, S. 35019(468)/82-PF. II]
S.O. 4232.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Central Engineering Works, Central Studios Colony, Singanailur Post Office, Coim- batore, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of. 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Gov- ernment hereby applies the provisions of the said act to the said establishment,
[No. S-35019{466)/82-PF.II]
S.O. 4230.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that (he employer and the majority of the employees in lela- tioa to the establishment known as Messrs Korvette Vibro Screens (Private) Limited, 137-A[1D, Karypakkam Village, Mahabalipuram Hish Road, Madras-96, have agreed that the piovisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscel- laneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should .be made applicnble to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applits the provisions of the said act to the said establishment,
INo. S-35019(463)|82-PF. II]
S.O. 4233.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Balaji Fabricators (Private) Limittd, 144, Seevaram Village, Perungudi (Post Office), Madras-96, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Piovident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, r952 (19 of 1952), should be. made applicable to the aaid establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act. the Central
1042 GI/82—7
4362 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA27, 1904 [PART II— SEC. 3(ii)]Government hereby applies the provisions of the said act to the said establishment
[No. S-35019(465)/82-PF.II]
S.O. 4234.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messis Sankaragiii Estate, Chenkara, Peermade Taluk, Wukki District, Kerala, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sec'ion (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions 'of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S-35019(464) /82-PRIT]
S.O. 4235.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Independent Test- ing Company (Private) Limited, 1, Vannier Street, Madras-1 including its branches at (1) No. 2], Dr. V. B. Gandhi Marft, Bombay-23 (Maharashtra), (2) "Shanthi", Plot No. 66, Raiijlt Nagar, Bedi Road, Jamnagar-2 (Gujarat) and (3) No. 66, Theatre Ror.d, Flat No. 2, Calcutta-17 (West Bengal) have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Micellnr^oiiN Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made app'icable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
fNo. S4 5019(460) /82-PF.H)
S.O. 4236.—Whereas it appears to the Centrnl Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs Sn Mappillai Vinayagar Sweet Drinks, G.S.T. Road, Pykara, Madurai-17, have agiccd that the provisions of ihe Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to Ihe said establishment;
Now. therefore, in txercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of (he said Act. the Central Government hereby applies the provision of the said Act to the said establishment.
fNo, S-35019(459)/82-PF.II]
S.O. 4237.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that iht employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Overseas Shipping Agencies, 50, Moore Street, Madras including its branches at {1) 43.-7-1-, Old Post Office Road, Kakinada-1 (Andhra Pra- desh), (2) 34, Bharath Building, Panje Mangesh Rao Road, Mangalorc-1, (Karnataka), have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now. therefore, in exorcise of tho powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby "applies Ihe provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S-35019(458)/82-PF.II]
S.O, 4238,—-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Electronic Compo- nents Manufacturing Industrial Co-operative Swietv Limited, B-6, FJectronic Industrial Estate, Kushainuda, Hyderabnd-762. have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to this said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions, of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S-35019(457)/82-PF.lI]
4363S.O. 4239.—Whereas h appears to the Central Government tijat the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- uon to the cstublshment known us Messrs Hanuman Secumy Services, Administrative Office, No. 4, Ashiam, Saiawathipur, Dhmwai (Karnataka), including its Registered Office Care of Raja and Reddy, Advocates, 6th Moor, Sagar Complex, Kempcgowda Road, Bangalore-9, have agreed that the provi- of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provi- sions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable lo the said establishment;
Now, therefoie, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) oi' Section 1 Jf tne said Act, the Central Oo\ernment hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S-3 5019(456.)/82-PF.TI]
S.O. 4240.—Whereas ft appeals to the Central Government mat the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs Vadasery PLnaias- ingan Street Handloom Weavers Sales Co-operalivc Society limited. No. 3461, No. 26, Vanchiathithan New Street, Vada- scry, Nagorcoil-1 including its branches at (1) No. 3461, Sales Depot, Opposite to Municipal Bus Stand, Thuckalay, Thucfcalay Post, Kanyakumari District and (2) o. 3461, Door No. 7-75, Near A.R.C. Parcel Office, Monday Market, Ntyyoor Post, Kanyakumari District, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provi- sions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by EUb-section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S-35O19(235)/82-PF.IJ]
S.O 4241.—-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela- tion to the establishment known as Messrs S. Sanyasi Rao and Company, Engineers, Contractor and Materials Sup- pliers, Nathayyapalem, J3.H.P.V. Post, Visakhapatnam. (.Andnra Pradesh), have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Misccllaneou" Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by s ub-section (4) of Section 1 of the Raid Act, the Ctntral Gov- einment hereby applies the piovi^ioos of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S-35O19(394)/82PF.I1]
S.O. 4242 Whereas it appears to the Cental Government that the empioyei t.nd the u.jjOiity oi im, i_iiiLno>eej in relation to the o .tablisliuitnt kivown as Messrs Rythaia Scva Sahakari Sangha Limited, Homrravally, Tiptur Taluk, including its oranch at Konenahally, Tiptur Taluk, Tumkur District (Kai nataka), have agreed that the provisions of the Employees.' Provident 1 unds and Miscellaneous Pro- visions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952;, should be made applicable to tht said establishment;
Now, therefoie, in otercice of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 1 ci the •sr.id Act, the Cental Govern- ment hereby npplies the provisions of the said Act to the 6aid establishment.
[No. S. 35019(198)/82-PF. II]
S.O. 4243,—Whereas it appeals to the Central Government that the employer and the mnjoiity oi the employes in relation to the establishment kiwiwn as Messrs Drill Rock Engineering (Private) Limited, 5-4, 187/324, Karbala Maidan, Secunderabad, have itreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provi- sions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, theiefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment heieby applies the provision^ of the said Act to the said establishment,
[No, S. 35019(152)/82-PF. irji
S.O. 4244.—Whereas it appear* to the Central Govei nment that the employer and the majoiity of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs N.V.G.B. Automobiles, No. 104, Bridge Station Road, Madu-
4364 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBE R 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]rai-625002, have agreed that the provisions of the Employee*1 Provident iFands and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 oi 1952,), should bt fCAdc applicable to the said establish- ment;
Now, thciefoic, ki e x c i se oi the poweis conferred by sub- jection (4) of Section 1 ol the said Act, the Central Govern- ment he eby applies the provisions of th_- said Act to the s;u"d establishment
[No. S. 35019(151)/82-PF. 11}
S.O. 4245.—Wheieas it appears to the Central Government thut tne employci anti Iho majoiity of the employees in i elation to the establishment known as Messrs Shrec Laxnii Spinners, 545, Snthy Road, Ganapathy, Coim- bato 10-641006, have agreed that the provisions of the Employ- ees' Provid-.'nt >junds anti Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said estab- lishment;
Now, therefore, In cverci'e of the poweis confened by sub- section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment heiehy applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S. 35019(149)/82-PF. IIJ
S.O. 4246.—Whereas ifappears to the Central Government th.it the employer arid the mBJoiily of the employees in relation to the establishment krrown at Messrs Narayanan Enterprises, Contractor, Audco Cycle Sland, 114, Butt ROLid, St. Thomas JVTount, Madras-16 (Near Nandam- bakikam), have agreed that the provisions of the Employee*' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), shouk; b; rn:ide applicable to the said estab- lishment;
Now, therefore, ir exercise oL the pinvers icnfeircd by sulv vxlion (4) of Section 1 of the said Act. the Central Govern- ment heteby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
{No. S. 35019(148)/82-PF. Ill
S.O. 4247.—Whereas it appears to thi Central Government :h-.t (he employed and the majority of the employees in Tclatinn to thi' eitab'iibmont known as Messrs Vyavasaya Seva Snhakan 9engh,i Niyamitn, Shikaripur Shimoga District (Kainataka), have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Pro- visions Act, 1052 (19 of 1952), should be made arpl^uble to the SHid establishment;
Now, therefore, in cxerci'e of the powers conferred by sUtv section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.
(No. S. 35019(147)/B2-PF. IK)
S.O, 4248.—Wheicts it ,>ppears tp ihz Contrul Government that the employer and the majority ot the employees in- relation lo the establishment known us Messrs Batcha Sons, Piece Goods Merchants, 166-A, East Masi Stieet, Madurai-625001 including its Show Room at Rosary Building, Town Hall Road, Madunri 625001 have agieed that tho provisions of the Employee?' Provident Funds and MU- cellaneons Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power;, confetred by sub- section (.4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby applies the piovisicns of the said Act to the said establishment.
[No. S. 350191146)/82-PF. II)
S.O. 4249,—Whereas it appears to th" Central Government thwt the employer and the majority of the employees ia relation to the eitablilhment knuwn as Messrs Khimijibh.ii Millt>, Post Box No. 120, Raviwarpet, Belgaum, Kainfltaka State, have agr*ed that the provisions of tho Em- ployees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should" be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in e.\t\ci'£ of the powers confined by sub- section (4) of Section 1 of tha said Act, the Central Govern- ment heieby applies the provisions of the said Act to tbe said establishment.
[No. S. 35019(145)/82-PF. II)
S.O. 4250.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to \hn establishment known as Mo*sr" Pioneer Mulhu Theatre, Ozhuginaseri, N^gercoil-l, have agreed that the provisions of the Fmptoye^s' Provident Funds and Miscellan-ous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) should XK made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefoie, in exercise of foe pov.cr.i contencd by sub- section (4) of Section 1 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hcicby applies the provisions of the said \<:t to tb" (aid establishment.
(No. S, 35019(144)/82-PF. Ill
4365New Delhi, the 26th November, 1982
S.O. 4251.—Whereas Messrs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Bangalore Complex, Bangtdore-560017 (KN/24) (.heremaiter re- ferred to as the said establishment) have applied tor exemption under sub-section (2A) ol! section i7 of the Employees' Provi- dent Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ("19 of 1952;, (hereinafter referred to as the said Act);
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any scpaiate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India it the nature of Life Insurance which are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme)",
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 o' the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all tho provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three yeats.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to th"; said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, KarnataVa maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as 'he Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The empiover shall pay such inspection charges af the Central Government may. rrjm tims to time, direct under clauie (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of evcy month.
3. All expenses involved in 'he administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, irob- mission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of
4 3 66 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(n)]accounts, payment of inspection charges et;. (ball be borne by the employer*.
4. Th.~ employer shall display on the Notice Board of the
eitaaiishment, a copy of the rules of ihc J W' p Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as end uhtn amended, alongwith a translation oE the oalirnt fea- ti-.cs Merecf, in the lanfiuuse of the majority of the emp- vecp
5 Whcrean an employee, who IE. iilrcuJy 8 -nembcr of the
Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer nhall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life- Insurance Corporation of India.
6 The employer ehe'Far-iinnt i.i euv:in.f w-t liere'-ls iivn;l- tble to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme ap- propn'ately, if the benefits available to the- employees under the said Scheme arc enhanceJ, no that thi benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme ari more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under iho (aid Scheme.
7. No withstanding anything contained in the Group Imn- r;ince Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under thia Scheme be lew than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee as compensation.
H. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insurance Scheme shall be made without the prior Approval of the Re- gional Piovidcnt Fund Commissioner, Karnataka and whore any amendment is likely to affect ed^e^^ely the Interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving hia approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of vleto,
9. Where, for any reason, Ihe employees of the said estab- lishment do not remain covered under tlie Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India a* already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employee? under thin Scheme nre reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable *o be cancelled. (
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium el.:, within the duo d.ite, as fixed by the Life Insu- rance Corpoiatjon of India, ancl the policy is allowed to lars*\ the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premium tlie responsibility for payment of assurance benefits to the nominees or the legal heir§ of deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of thii exemption, shall b" that •of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation
[No. S-35014(29)/82-PF. IT]
4367S.O. 4252.—Whereas Messrs Shaw Wcllance and Company Ltd., Andhra Winery and Disllllary, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad- 500047 (AP/3103) (heicinaffer refeircd to as the said establish- ment) have applitd for exemption under sub-section (2A) of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella- neous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 195"!), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act);
And whereas, the Central Government ii satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without malting any separate contributions or payment of premium, in en- joyment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the natiuc of life insurance which are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employee? Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Schema);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- Btction f?.A) of Section 17 of the said Act and' subject to the cor J f*ons specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establishment from (he oociation of all the piovisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
I. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- rnwirmrr, Andhrn Pradesh maintain such accounts and Pro- vide for such" facilities for Inspection, as the Central Govern- ment may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of Section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All .expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of accoun's, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is alrei'ly n member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
6. The employer Bhall arrange to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme arc enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme nrc more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
.7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the paid scheme, the employer wball pay the difference to the legal heir /nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall ba made without the piior approval of the Regional Provident ^urnl Oornrrnisioner, AnHhra Pradesh atirl whcie any amendment I* I VPIV to affect idv^rRcly the interest of the emnloyees the Ren'onal Provident Fund Com- missioner shall before aivinij his approval, give B reason- able opportunity to the employees to explain thsir point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the said establishment do not remain covered under the Group Insu- rance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of Tnrlia as already adonted bv the tHd establishment, or the benefits to the cnnloyees under this Scheme arc. reduced to any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10 Where, for any lea^on, the employer fails to nay the premium etc. -within 'he d'if dMe, ni fixt-d by the T ifc Insu- rance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed Ui lapse, the exemption is liable to bo cancelled.
11. In case of default, if any made bv the employer in pay- ment of premium the responsibility for naynu-nt of (insurance benefits to the nominees or the leeal heirs of deceased mem- ber"; who would, have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the emp- loyer.
12, Upon the death of the member covered undrr the JVhenv, the employer in relation to the said establishment
[No. 5 35014f24fi>'R2-PF. Ill
4368 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AORAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART I I ~ S E C. 3(ii)]S.O. 4253.—Whereas Messrs Eastern Air Products (P) Ltd., 1&2 Govindpur, Industrial Estate, BhopaM62023 (MP/1528) (hereinafter referred to a" the gnid establishment) have applied tor exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of tho Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provision* Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act);
And whereas, the Central Government i* satisfied that the employees of the said establishment, are, without mak- ing any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefit* under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of life Insurance which are more favourarble to such em* ployees than the benefits admissible under the Employee*' Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establitbment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner. Mndhya Pradesh, maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time te time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of evsry month.
3. All expenses involved In the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenace of accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of account1), payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and as and when amended, alongwith a trnnslation of the salient features thereof in the language of the majoritv of the emp- loyees.
43695. Whereas an employee, who is already u member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, i3 employed in hjj establishment, the employer shall immediately eurol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of Indifc.
6. The employer shall urranse to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the bentfits available to the employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that 'he benefits available under (he Group Insurance Scheme are more favour- able to the employees than the benefits admissible under th..' said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contmnfd in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if~on the death of an empolyee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount thaf would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the Drovision-. of the Gioup Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, T.fadhya Pradesh and where any amendment h likely fo affect adversely the interest of the employees, the Regional Piovident Fund Com- missioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the said establishment do not remain covered under the Group Insu- rance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premimum etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In £asc of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of ;he employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme (he employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee /legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insu- rance Corporation of India.
fNo. S-350U(247)/82-PF. TIJ
1042 GI/82- 8
4370 THE GAZETTE OF INM4 : DECEMBER 1"_. 1 9 8 2 / A G l ^ H A Y A N A^ I W ^ P AM I ^ J O Ol
S.O 4254.—Whereas Messrs Menon and Menon Private Limited Vikram Nagar, Kolhopur.416005, Maharashtia India (MH/2*591) (hereinafter referred to as the said establishment) have' applied for exemption under sub-section (2A) of sec- tion 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Piovisions Act. 1952 09 of 1952) (hereinafter refencd to as the said Act),
And ttheieas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution ©repayment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insurance which are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three ye irs.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner. Maharashtra, maintain such accounts and provide cach facilities for inspection, >s the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay "uch inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. AH exoenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of .-jccounts, payment of inspection charge? etc. shall be borne by (he employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme* as approves by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees.
5*. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of
6. The emrfovei "boll snares to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under fhs G " up Insurance Scheme an- propriatelv, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so (hat the benefits available tmder the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the eropJovees than the benefits admissible under fhe said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- nnce Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount ravable under this "scheme be 1e".? than the amount that ftould bo payable had employ-so beeo covered under tne saw Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal beirynominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insurance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Re- gional Provident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable op- portunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees oi the said establishment scheme do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemp'ion shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premimum etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. fn case of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insu- rance Corporation of India.
[No. S-35014(250)/82-PF. II]
437 L
SO 4255—Whcioa Messis lhs Delhi (JO h A. Gcnei il MUK ns Act, 19~)2 (I1) of 14^2) (hcitinnftci jefenul to is Ihc i.nd \cl) .
And \vhetens, the Central Government i$ satisfied that the employees of the said establishment aic without making jiiy 8cp.ti.ile contribution or p.i>men' ol premium, in OL jojmenl of bcnelits undei the Group lnviuanci: Scheme of the 1 lfo Insurance Corporation of i n Ju m the nauLic of Lite Insurance which arc moie favourable |o su^h employees than the benefit^ adnusMble under tho Employees Dt-poiit-LinVed Insuidiicc Scheme, \97f> (htreuuftct referred U) A* the said Si.ht.mc),
Now thcrcloie in e\en-isc of the poweis tonlcired by sub section (2A) ot bection 17 of (he "aid Act itnd sub]ett t<> the conditiont, hpccitied in the Schedule annexed hereto the Central Go-icrnrnent hrrebv exempts the said establish- ment fiom the opeiation of ad (he provisions of tho taid Scheme toi a penod of ihiee _,^ar"
SCH1 Dl I b
1 The ernploici in icUlion to the "aiJ tsiabLihmeut shall iiibmir Nui-h retunis to the R-gion.il Pro\i\Uent Fund Com- missionei, Dilhi, in untain SULCI ILLOIHIIS and provide stith facilities foi insptttion, a^ the Central
2 rht emj 1O>LI shull p i\ MILII inspc>.Lion Lhiii^ts as tin; Ccntidl Oo\crnmein may, fi im Um" to tune, direct under L!IUS" (n) of subjection (3A) ot section 17 of th" said Act, within 11 di>s liom the 4372 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II— SEC 3(ii)]
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Piovidcnt bund Commissioner, Delhi and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner shall before giving hia approval, give a reasonable op- portunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the said establishment do not remain covered undL-r the Group Insu- rance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India a" already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any man- ner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insu- lance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In caso of default, if any made by the employer m payment of piemium the responsibility for payment of assu- lance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of ihe emp- loyer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in lelation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee/ legal heirs entitled for it and -in any case within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insurance Cor- poration of India.
[No. S-35014(253)/82-PF. II]
SO 4256—Whcreus Messrs Delhi Electnc Supply Undeitak- ing Sakti Sadan, Kottd Road, New Delhi (DL/138) (hereinafter leferrcd to as the said establishment) have applied for exemp- tion under sub-section <2A) of Section 17 of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) the said Act;
And whereas, the Central Government is latisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in en- joyment of benefits under the Group Insurance scheme of the
4373Life Insuiance Corpoitttion of India in the nature of Life Insurance which are more favourable to such employees tlKin the benefits admisbible under the Employees deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the taid Scheme);
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nomi- nee/legal heir* entitled foi it and in any case within 7 days of tho receipt of the sum assured froii the Life Insurance Cor- poratinn of India.
[No. S-35(JlJf32i7)/S2-l'F. Ill Mow, therefore, in exercise of the poweis conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to trie conditions specified in the SCHEDULE annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby e tempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the suid Scheme for a period of three yean.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in telation to the said establishment shall submit Mich returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner. Delhi, maintain such accounts and ptovide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such ibspection charges ,•> the Cential Government may, fiom time to time, direct under clause la) of sutvscction (3A) ot section 17 of Ihe said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expends involved in the administration of the Group Jnsmancc Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfei of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the rstabllshment, a copy of th" rules of the Group Insurance Scheme us approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alonjrwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in the language ot" the majority of the emp- loyees.
5. Wheieas an employee, who ii already a. member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in hig establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him ns a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necei- sary premimum in respect of him to the Life Insurance Cor- poration of India,
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefit* avail- able to the employees under ihe Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Gioup Insurance -Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefitg admissible under the laid Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the- death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the iald Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/ nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insurance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Re- gional Provident Fund Commissioner, Delhi and here any amendment is likely to nffeot adversely the interest of the employees the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees o£ the said estab- lishment do not remain covered under the Grouo Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled,
10. Where, for any reason, the eniDloyer fails to pay the premium etc, wiihin the due date as flxid by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if any made by the employer in pay- ment of premium the responsibility for payment of assurance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased mem- bers who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for Er,int uf thii exemption, shall hi that of \ht emn Wei.
4374 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]S.O, 42S7.—Whereas Messrs Sul^m Chemicals, Plot No. 10/3, G.LD.C. L-'sUte, Vatva, Ahmcdabaci (GF/5295) (here- inafter referred to as the ^id esiabilihmcnt) have arplied for exemption under sub-section (2A) uf section 17 of the Em- ployees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952J (hereinafter referred to tn the said AcO;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied ih.it the employees of the said e_>tab!ishincnt are, without making any- separate contribution or fnynvni of premium, in enjoyment of benefits lindti the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insurance which are more favourable to such employee* than the benefits admissible under the nnifi'uyrci Deposit-I inked Insurance S;he.nw, ?l>76 I hereinafter referred to as [he said Scheme);
IVo*, therefore, in exrifi":i: of the poweis conferred by sub-section <2A) of section 17 of the !>nid Ac( and subject to the conditions ^pecifleJ in the Schedule annexed hereto the Central Government heieby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a perfod of three year?
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Gujarat maintain such accounts and provide nuch facililicj for inspection, ;is the Central Government may direct from lime to time,
1. Th" eniph>>Vr sh.i'l juy "iiuh inlr"i;lior" ehiiiti.--, IK the ( tiitral Government m ly, l'Knn lime to time, diresti under chnsc (a) of sub-section (3A) of eection 17 of the s.iid Act, within 15 days from the close of e\ery month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Jmurancc Scheme, including maintenance of accounti, sub- mission of returns, paymeut of insurance premia, transfer of accounts, paymenL of inspection charges etc. thai) bo borne by the employer.
4, The empJojer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as nppiovod by the Ccntr.il Government and, a* and when amendcu, alongwith a tianilation of Ihe salient feature* thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees/
"i. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of "n establishment exempted under the said Act, is -employed in bu i;siabliihment, the employer ahall immediately ciuol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay rteceuiiiry premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corpora- tion of India.
6, The employer shall airauac to enhance Ihe benefit* avail- able to the crnplyeej under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employees under ihe said Scheme are enhanced, eo that ins benefits available nnder the Group Insurance Scheme arc more favourable to the employees than the Benefits admisiible under the "aid Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding Anything contained in the Gioup In- surance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount pa>ablc under this schema be less than the amount lhat would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the diffeience to the legs I heir/no- minee of the employee as compensation,
F. No amendment of the provision of the Group insurance Scheme Khali bo made without the pricr approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissionci, Gujarat and wheie any amendment is likely to affect adversely the in- terest of the employees, ihe Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner shall before giving hi* approval, pive a leasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
y. Whcic, for any rewon, the employees of the "aid es- tablishment do not remain covered und"r the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefit* to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption ahali be liable 1o be cancelled. 4
10. Where, for any reason, the employer f-tils to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy i" allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to b,e cancelled.
51. In ense of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of as- surance benenlB to the nomineei) or the legal heirs of deceased member* who would have been covered under the "aid Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the snld establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and in anv caie with 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Lrfe Insurance Corporation of India.
fNo. S35O14(258)/82-PF.riJ
S.O. '4258.—Whereas Alexis A.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad (AP|33OO) (here- inafter referred to as the said establishment) have applied for exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Em- ployees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (heieinafler leferred to as the said Act);
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the s>aid establishment ure, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Gioup Insurance Scheme of tic I ife Insurance Corporation of India, in the nature of Life Jnsurace which are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the mid Sdiernej ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
'
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner, Andhra Pradenh maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, ax the Central Govern- ment may direct from lime to fime.
2. 1 he employer ahall pay such inspection charges OB the Central Government may, irom time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of returns, payment of insurance preinia, transfer i'f accounts, payment of inspection charges etc, shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insu* j.itice Scheme as approved by the. Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in th^ lungnace of the majority Of the employees.
5. Wheieas an employee, who is already a member ">f the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of ;in establishment exempted under the said Act, i,v employed in his esiiiblishmcnt. the employer shall immediately enrol him-as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme
4376 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. : DECEMBER IS, 1982/AGRAHAYANA11, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]appropriately, if the benefits available" to Hie employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme fire more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would bo payable hnd employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference^ to the kgal heirs/nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund ('ommisMOnei, Andhra Pradesh and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the interest of ihe employees, the Regional Pro- vident Fund Commissioner shall before jiving his approval give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of v;o\v,
9. Whcie for any reason, the employees of the said esta- blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the snid establishment, or the benefits to the em- ployees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer faili to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of defualt, if any made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the "did .Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that' of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
[No, S-35014(296O)/82-FF. TI]
A311
SO. 4259.—Whereas Messis The Southern Textiles Limited, P.B. No, 1117, ' 59-B, Venketasarny Road R. S. Purem, Coimbatore-(.TN/937) (hereinafter referred to as the said estab- lishment; h;ive applied for exemption under sub-section (2A) of stction 17 of Lhe Employees' Provident Fund nnd Mis- cellaneous Provis'Ons Act, 1952 (10 of 1952) (hereinafter re- lerred to ns the said Act);
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that lhe employees of the said establishment aie, without making jny separate contribution on payment of premium, in enjoy- n\*i| of bencfils under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insmance Corporation of Tndia in the nature of Life Insurance which are more favourable to such emp1oyt.es than lhe benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme) ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by iub-iection (2A) of section 17 of the said Act end subject to tlic conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establiih- ment from the op-ration of all ihe provision! of the said Scheme for ft period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall vilimit -mi-h, returns to the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner, Tamil Nadu, maintain such accounts t>nd provide such facDitieR for inspection, ns thE Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. Tht employer shall pay
3. All expenses involvod in the administration of the Cuoup Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of account*, submission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer nf accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be Hi,nf by (he employc-r.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Iniu- i.-rve Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, ni and when amended, alongwith a translation of the xalient fcuUncg thereof, in lhe language of Ihe majority of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Piovident Fund or the Provident Fund of nn establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in hi-i establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in resnect of him to the Life Insurance, Curporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange \o enhance the benefits i-wiilable to the cmnloyees under the Group Iniumnce Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employee! under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits failablc under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admhiible linger the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee tb© amount payable under this -,cheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the baid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nomincc of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Tamil Nadu and where any wnendment is likely to affect adversely the interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of vitw.
10^*2 GI/K2—9
9. Where for any reason, the employee* of the said esta- blishment do not remain covered under the Group Injuranc* Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment or the benefit* to the employees under thii Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall bo liable to bo cancelled.
10. Where for any reason, the employer fails- to pay the premium within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of, India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to bo cancelled.
11. In caie of default, if anv made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been, covered under the laid Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the noTiin^e/legjl heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days of the receipt of the mm assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
INo. S-35014(261)/R2-PF. II]
4378 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II SEC. 3(irtjS.O. 4260.—Whereas Messrs Bhaiat Heavy Plate and Vessels Ltd., Visakhapatnam (AP/3495) (hereinafter referred to as the said establishment) have applied foi exemption under sub-sec- tion (2A) of section 17 of the Employees,' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (I'J of 1952) (hereinafter referred to ns the slid Act) ;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment aie, without making any separate contiibuiion 01 pavment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, in the nature of T.ilc Irmirace which are more favourable )o such employee! than the benefit* admissible undei the Employees Deposit-Linked rmurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the i"id Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the poweis eonfcired by iiib-ncL-tion <2A) of section 17 of the said Act ?nd subject to the conditions •pecified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the tenlial Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the ."nid Suheme foi a period of thiee years.
SCHEDUI E
1. The employer in relalion to the said establishment shall submit such returni to the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner, Andhid Pradesh, maintain such accounts nml provide such facilities of inspection, an the Central Government may direct from rime to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection t-hatgesi a* the Central Government may, from lime ta time, direct undei clauie (HJ of "ub-section (3A) of .section 17 of the said Act within 15 diyi from the close of everv month.
3. All expenses involved in the adminishation of the dump Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of returns, payment of insmance premiu, transfer oi Hccounti. payment of inspection charges crc. shall be boinc by the employer.
4. 'J he employer shall display on the Notice Board of ihf establishment, a copy of the rule* of the Group Insu urtLe Scheme .15 approved by the Central Government ana, .is and when amended, alongwith n liansiation Pf the salient teniiiies thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees.
5 Wherein an employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund at an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in hi* establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him os a member of the Gioup Insurance Scheme and pny necessaiy premium in respect of him to the life Insurance 1 orporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefit* available to the employee! under the Gioup Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employee* under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits a\ai)ablc under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employee* than the benefit* admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme uo less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the "aid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the lepal heir'nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of tho Regional Piovident Fund Commissionci, Andhra Pradesh and wheic any amendment is likely to affect adversely the interest of the employees, ihe Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner shall before wiviiijj his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain theii point of view.
9. Where for any reason, the employees of the said eita- hlishtnent do not lemain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under the- Scheme are reduced in any manner the coemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In ense of default, it' ,inv rinde bv |J,c employer in pa\ment of premium the responsibility for payment of ajsu- lance benefit* to the nominee* or the legal heirs of deceaied members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under th" Scheme the employer in relation to the said establiihmeDt
4379shall ensure prompt payment of the sum awured to th" nominee/legal heirs entitled for n and in any cuse within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
LNo, S-35OI4(262)/82-PF. II]
SO. 4261.—Whcrea-, Mcsais 1 hi; Timen.uipjlli District Co- opeiativc Spinning Mills J-td. Kami, Trichy Distt. (TN/ 5562) (hciemafter referred lo as the said establishment) have iipptied for *jvemplion under sub-section <2A) of section 17 of the Hmployee*' Piovident Funds and Miscellaneous Pio- visions Act, iy52 (19 of 11J52) (hereinjiter lefcired to as the said Act; ;
And wheieas, the Central Government is iattsiied that the employee* o£ the said establijhment arc, without making any separate contribution oi payment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefit? under the Gtoup Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, in the nature of Life lniuracc w?lich "re more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employee! Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme) ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power? conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempt* the taid estabU*- ment from the operation of all the provMont of the amid Scheme for a period of three yean.
SCHEDULE
4380 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. : D5CEMBER18, 19S2/AORAHAYAN\ 27, 1904 [EMIT I I - S E C. 3(ii)]2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges at th" Central Government may, from time to time, direct unckr clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the t-ij Act within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of account*, submission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of account*, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the-Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insu- lance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, na and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient featuiej thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
6. The employer shall Arrange to enhance the benefit* available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount nayablc under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the "aid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee us compensation.
8. No amendment of the provision* ct the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund. Commissioner, Tamil Nadu and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the in- tciest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where for any reason, the employees of the said esta-
blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of (ho life- Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the em- ployees under this Scheme are reduced' in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Lff" Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of defualt, if any made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceaied members who would have teen covered under the laid Scheme but for grant of thia exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee/1eg;il hciis entitled for it and in any case within 7 day" of the receipt of the lum assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
'JNTo. S-35014(263)/82-PF. II]
4381S.O. 4262.—Whereas Mcs,is Bhaiut Hc-.ivy L'ccaicals Lid., Unil, HPEP. Ramchardra Piii.im, Hyderabad-JO(H>32 (AP/ 2938) (hereinafter referred to as ihc said establishment) have applied fur exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Piovisiuns Act, li)52 119 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to :is the iaid Acl) ;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the. employe^ of the said establishment ure, without mrkinj? -Liny scpni.'itc conlrihiunin oi pay men* of pitmium, m enjoy- ment of benefih under the Gtoup Insurance Scheme of the Life Insmanpe CurpO''aiirm of Tndia in the nature of 1 iTe Insurance which arc moic favourah) * to men empknecs than the benefit admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Iiiiirance "Scheme, 197S (hereinafter referred lo as the said Scheme) ;
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of ihe establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Jnsu- untc Stheme as approved by the Central Government and, is and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient ..uliues thereof, in the language of the majority of the . inployeet.
5. Whereas an employee, who is alicady a member of Lhe Employees' Piovident Fund or the Provident t u ud of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in hi" establishment, tbe employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of lhe GTOUP Insuiance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life Intuiance . .rporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employee* under the Group Insurance Schema appiopriatcly, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme arc enhanced, so that the benefit1* available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Iniu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to tht legal heir/nomincc of the employee a. umire.iViiiion.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of 'he Regional PiovkLnt 1'iinJ Commissioner, (Hyderabad), Anjhra Pradesh and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the intciest of the employees, the Regional Provi- dent l*und Commisjion'.'r shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity lo the employees to explain .heir point of view.
'). Wheie, for any reason, the employees of tbe said esta- blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of tho Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to tho em- ployees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the .xemption shall be liable to bo cancelled.
10. Whcie, for any reason, tho cmplojer fails to pay tie premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Lif" Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed lo lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of defunlt, if any made by the employer iB payment of premium etc. the responsibility for payment of ijSurance benefits to the nominees or the legut heirs of deceased members who would have been covored under the said S;heme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of (lie employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under tho S -heme, the emplqycj- in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum aisured to tbe nornineeliejal heirs entitled for it and in nn\ case within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
[No. S-35OI4(264)/82-PF. II]
4382 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]S.O. 4263,—Whcicas Mcssis llimansu Chemicals Pihatc I imited, Plol No. 10/3A, fjlDC Estate, Vatva, Ahmedabad ( ( J J / 6 8 9 5) (hereinafter rcfcirrd to us the said establishment.) • have applied for exemption undei sub-section I2A) of Section 17 of the hmployees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provi- sions Act, 1952 (19 o( 1952) (heriinaltci icfeiicd to as the sjid Act);
And vtheieas, the Centtal Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any sepaiate contribution or payment ot premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme- of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, in the nature of Life Imurace whuh are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible tinder the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereimifter referred to L;S the said Seheme) ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers confeired by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the §aid Act and subject to the conditions specific in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the ""id Scheme foi a period of thiee years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner, Gujarat, maintain such accounts and provide such facilities loi inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection chaiges .9 the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (.1) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act within 15 days from the close of every month,
3. All expenses involved in the administration of tht Oioup Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of returns, payment of insurance prcmia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be boine by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board ol the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insu- nice Scheme as approved by the Central GovirDment and, us anj when amended, alongwith a translation of th" salient featuieg thertof, in the language of the majority of the employees.
5 Whereas an employee, who is idready a -ncmber of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the "aid Act, ii employed in his establishment, the employer •hall immediately enrol
4.183
inn , s a member of ihe Gioup Insurance Scheme and pa\ ncicsinry premium in respect of him to the [ ife Insuiance Corpoiation of India.
b. The employer sh ill air.uif^ to enhance the benefils available to the employee* under the Group Insurance Scheme .ippropriately, if the benefits available to the employers under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits .is.nhiblc under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable lo the employees than th
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under 1his scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the le^'al heir/nomine; uf Ihe employ t,'c as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of tiic Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made v, itrnut ihe prio" approval of the Regional Provident, 1 niul Commissioner. Gujaral and where any amendment is likely to affect idverseJy Ihe interest of the employees, Ihe Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner shall heli-ire piving hi* nppro\nl Rive a reasonable opporlunitv to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Wliere for any reason, the employees of the (aid esta-
blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Coiporation of Ivdi.i as already adopted bv the mill establishment, or the benefits to the employee; under lliis Scheme arc reduced in nnv manner, the exemption shall be Ii;ible lo be cancelled
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, n fixed by the life Insurance Corporation of India, ind the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of defuait, if any mad* by ihe employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of usu- ranee benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceaied memberi who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of thii exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said eitiblinhment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee'lo.nnl heirs entitled for it and in anyi case within 7 dnyi of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
[No. S-1M)14(2fi5)/82-PF. Ill
438 \ THE GAZnTTr OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 19Q4 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]SO. 42fi4.—Whereas Messr, A;uu f'efio Chemical lndus.1- iks Pnv.tc limited, Ahiwd.ikid (OI1113) (hereinaltei rc- tei cd lo as Ihe said esinblish ~.\ont) have applied for exemp- tion under mih-*cction I2A) of section 17 of the Employees' I'loviucnt F;un
And WIICICJS Hit CVnli.il Government is sytisticd that the employees of the ^aid establishment aic, without making any sepjrr.te conMhulioM oi pmnv.-nt oT premium, in enjov- ment of benefits under the Group Iniirrance Scheme of the I 'fa Insuidncc Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insurance which ire morj favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Jlepo ;t-l inLej Ii'.siiinncc Scheme, 1976 (herrinp.fter refeired to a>. the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by yib-sed'on (2A) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to thi* conditions spculKI in the Schedule annexed here- to, the Certrni Government hereby exempts the said cttnb- IKhmcnt fiom the operation of all the provisions of the fuk\ S^hc-ne for u period of th-ee years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment jhall Mibmit •(uch returns to the Regional Piovident Fund Commissioner, Gujarat, maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Ciovern- ment nviy diicct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Centml Government may, from time to time, direct urder clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section, 17 of the 'aid Act. within 15 d.iys from the close of cvsry month.
3. All expenses involved in the administnti in of the Group Inwranr-e Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of rctmns, payment of insurance piemia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges elc. shall be borne by the employers.
4. The employer shall display on the Nonce Boaid of the estabMshmcnt, a copy of the rules of the Group In- siii.nce Scheme a? ..pproved by the Central Government finri, as ;'nd when amended. :iloncwith a translation of the salient feature? thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees
5. Whe.ens an employee, who is already a member of ihe Employee*' Piovident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act,
6. The employer ih.iU unange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the em- ployees under the slid Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available und;r the Group Insurance Scheme are moie favourable to the employees than the benefits ndmis- s'ble under the sairJ Scheme.
7. NolwilhstandinK anything contained in the Group Tn- surance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the nmount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the "aid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal hcHnominee of the employee as compensation.
8 No amendment of the provisions of the Group Jn- siiK.ncc Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Gujarat and where any^amendmeut is likely to affect advcisely the interest of ill- employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his anpioval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain Iheir point of view
'), Wheje, fpr any reason, Ihe employees of the mid estab- lishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the I ife Insurance Corporation or Indiu ai alicidy nd.Vttd bj ihe -.aid estdblishment, or the benefits to the employees under Ihe Scheme arc reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled,
10. Where, for ;,ny reason, the employer fails to pay the nicmimum. etc. within th© due date, as fixed by the Life In- smnrt-e t orporation of India, and the policy is allowed to hpw ihi exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. Tn ea,ie of default, if any made by the employer In p.iyment of premium Ihe responsibilty for payment of asiu- i.incc bcnefiN to the nominees or Ihe legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the "aid Scheme but for giant of this evemption, shall he that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the S.hernc Ihe employer in relation to the laid estabiivhment !,hall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to tke nominee/ISJMI heirs entitled for it and in any etise within 7 dnys of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life In- srrnnce Corporation of Tndia.
I No. S-35014(266)/N2-PF. II]
4385S.O. 4265.—Whoreus Messrs Cooper Engineering Limited, Poom-19 including its brant hes at (I) Chinchwad. Poona-19 and y2) 654 J. M Road, Pune-411004 and the concern at ChinLhwad, Pune-19, (MH/2814) (hereinafter referred to as the inid establishment) have applied for exemption under sub-section <2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Fund's and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act).
1042GI/82-10
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of tho said establishment are, without making any separate contribution oi payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits under (he Group Insurance Scheme of tic Life [tisuiincc Corpontion of India in the nature of Life In- cu i1 nee whi h are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Lsi.b-.section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the SCHEDULE annexed here- to, the Central Government hereby exempts the said cstab- I'shmen' from the operation of all the provisions of the "nid S_~heme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to tho said establishment Minll submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Maharashtra (Bombay) maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Gove-p ment may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as tho Central Government m ay, from time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the snid Act, within 15 dayi from tho close of every month.
3. All expenses involved fh the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of a.counts, submission of returns, payment of insurance premin, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as nnj when amended, a'nng with a tj^.nslrftion of the salient features thereof, in the language of the majority of ihe em- ployees.
5. Whereas an employees, who is already a member of the Employees' Provident Fund "r the Provident Fund of ni establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in reapect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if tho benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme arc more-favourable to the employees thnn the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained ^n the Group In- surance Scheme, if on the death, of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employer been covered under the sdd Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provision! of the Group In- surance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident 'Fund Commissioner, Afahunithtra ("Bombay) and where any amendment is likely to affect adver- sely the interest of the employee, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his approval, give a iCsonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employee*) of the said es- tablishment do not remain covered under the' Group In- surance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefit* to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable, to br fancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the pr-mium ct". within the due date, as fixed by the Life Tnsm.incc Corporation of India, and the polfcy is allowed to lirsi, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if any made by tho employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of as- surance benefits to the nominees or the 'egal heirs of
4386 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18,1982/AGRAHAVANA 27,1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer In relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of tie sum assured to the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 Jays of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life In- surance Corporation of India.
[No. S-35014 (301)|82-PF.II]
S.O. 4266.—WhercaB Messrs Elpro International Limited, Chinchwadgjon, Poona including its legistcred office at Naiirrwn Point, Bombay and bianchcs at Dubash Chembers, Knmpla Street, Bombay fii) Wcllesicy House, Calcutta and (lii) Aichna Office Complex, Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi (heieinafter tcferred to as the said establishment) have applied for exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Atf, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Raid Act) ;
And whereas, the Central Government Is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Lifo Insurance Corporation of India in the nntuie of life In- surance which are more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the SCHEDULE annexed hereto the Central Government hereby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the piovisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
4387SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident ruud Com- missioner, Mahaia&hlra, maintain such accounts and piuvidc buch facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pny such inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expense* involved in tho administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of returns, payment of Insurance prcmia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be boine by tho employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, aa end when ami nded, aloiiR with a translation of the salient features thetcof, in the language of the majority ot the employees.
5. Where.is an employee, who is alieady a member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act. in em- ployed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the em- ployees under the said Scheme arc enhanced, to that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admis- sible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in tho Group In- surance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of 1he employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group In- surance scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Pi evident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra and vvheie any amendment is likely to affect adversely the in- terest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the said esta- blishment do not remain covered under tie Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as al- ready' adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
tO. Where, for any Teason, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insu- rance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if any made by the employer in payment of picmium 'ihc iexpansibility for payment of assurance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased membcis who would have been covered under the snij. Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to _ the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and in any c∾ within 7 Jays of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life In- silence Corporation of India.
[No. S-35014 (31D/82-PF. II]
4388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC3 (ii)]SO 4267—Whereas Messis Jay Hind Sciaky Limited, D-l Block, Plgt No. 18/1, CbinOiwad, Poona-411019 (MH/14766) (hereinafter referred to as the- said establishment) have applied tor exemption under sab-section (2A) of section 17 of the fcinployccs' Provident hunds and Miscellaneous Provisions Ad, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) ;
And whereas the Ccnti:il Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without nuking any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insu- rance which are more favourable tt> such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976
Now, therefore, in exercise of trie powers conferred by tub-section (2A) of socfinn 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in th.i Schedule, annexed hereto, (he Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment fiom the operation of nil the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years,
^CHEDULL
1. The employer i'l relation to- the said establishment shall Mibmit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Corti- mi"SToner, Mnharashtu (Bombiyi, maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Govern- ment may direct from time to time.
2. The emplover •ihall p.iv such inspection charges as the Tenlrnl Government mjv, from time to time, direct under cbu-r 00 of sub-section HA) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3 All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance ol accounts, submission of returns, payment of insurance premia, Uanster of necenmts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employers.
4 The employer shall dispky on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of tue ruleg of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by tbe Central Government and, as and when amended, along with a ti dilution of the salient features thereof, in the lansuoga of the majority or trio employcca.
5. Whereas an employee, who i" already a member of the Employees" Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him tr> !he Life Insuiancc Corporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the G.oup Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the em- ployees under the said SUiemc are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to th? employees than the benefits admis- sible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in tbe Giuup In- surance Scheme if on the .death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered trader the snid Scheme, the cmploj'er shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee as compensation
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Gi*up Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra 'Bombay) and wheic any amendment is likely to alTcct adver- sely the interest of the employeea, the Region.il Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employee^ 'LO explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employer! of the said esta- blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the empoyer fails tj pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life In- surance Corporation of India, and the j>olicy is allowed to lapse, the exemption ia liable fo be cancelled,
11. In case of default, if anv made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for pavment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirq of deceased members who would have been covered under the snid Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall he that of the employer,
12. Uoon the death of the member covered under the Schemo the cmnloyer in relation to the said eMablisftmen* shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee /legal heirs entitled for ^ and in anv ea
[No, S-35014 (314\rS2-PF. HI
4389S.O. 4268.—Whereas Messrs Walchandnagar Industries Limi tad, P.O. Walchandnagar (District Pune) (ME1/9128) (httrcin- . after referred to as the said establishment) have applied for
exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Err^ plovers' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act* V)51 (19 of 1952} (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) j
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution, or payment of premium, irt enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, in the nature of Life Iniurance which ate more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible jnder the Employees Deposit- Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to a" the sai
Now, therefore, in exeioiie' of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) o[ ^cctioa 17 of the ".aid Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Sehone for a period of three yean.
SCHEDULE
1. Th" employer in lelation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to Ihc Regional President Fimd Com- miswoniT Mahavshtrn, maintain such accounts and pro- vide such facilities for inNpccckm, as the Central Govern- ment may direct from time "to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Central Government may. from time to time, direct under dau"e (a) Of sub-section <3A) of Section 17 of the said Act, withm 15 days from the close of every month.
3. AD expenses involved in the administration of the Ciroun Insurance Scheme. inclvdhm maintenance of recounts submission of return", pavm-.nt of insurance prernia, transfer <.f a-counts, pavment cf inspection charges etc. shall be home by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the csUbTuhaient, a copy of the rule? of the Group Insurance c We B, unproved bv rho Control Government ind, as and 1, ;" ^."nded. alonawirh n trmulatirn of the -nlicnt features t'i"rcof in the lanpuape of the m.iiority of the employee*
5. Wtifi-Ms nn rmpU-'Vee. who is nlreac'v n r - m b -r of the ErnHoye-s Provident Fund or the Provident Fiimi of an establihment exempted under the aid Act, is employed in
4390 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA, 27,1904 [PART U—SEC. 3(tt)]his establishment, the emp'oyer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group L.iurance Scheme and pay neces- sary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Cor- poration of India.
6. Tha employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to th0 employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to (he em- ployees under tlie said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme am more favourable to the employees than the benefits admis- sible under the said Schema.
7. Notwithstanding anything1 contained in the Group Inr suranco Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would bii payable hid employee been covered under Ihe ftald Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of tlic provisions of the Group Insu- mnce Scheiro ihall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra and Avhere any amendment is likely to affect adversely the inter- est of the employees, the Regional Provldqit Funj Commis- sioner shall before- giving iais approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any rearon, the employees of the said esta- blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees urajer this Sch?ine are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any leaioti, the empoyer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due d&te, as fixed by the Life In- surance Corporation of India, and the policy ia allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled
11. In case of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premiran the responsibility for payment- of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who woulji have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall bo that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establish- ment shall ensure piompt paiment of the sum assured to the nominee /legal heirs entitled f< 1 it and in nnv case within 7 days of the receipt of the sim assured from the Life Insu- rance Corporation of India
[No. S-35014 <320)/82-PF. II]
S O 4269. Whereas Messrs Walchandnagar Industries Limi- ted (Muduinalayuj, F.O. Walchandnagar, District Pune (MH/9129) (hereinafter referred to as the said establishment) have applied ioi exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) ,;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied tha.t the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group insurance Scheme of the Lite Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of Life Jnsur.uuc which are more favouiable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit- Linktd Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the i,aij Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise; of the powers confeircd by si/D-ncction (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Maharashtra, maintain such accounts and pro- vide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Govern- ment may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under claiisc (a) of sub-section (3A) of Section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of leturns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of accounts, psvment of insria'.ion charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall rtispjjy on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the i ulei of the Group Insurance Scheme as approve^ by the Centitil Government and. as and when amended, alongwith ? transl >tton of the salient features thi-rcof, in the lanjruase of the majnrilv of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of the Err-ffnv"s' Provident Fund or th" Provident Fund of an ec'-Hiihrnent exempted under the said Act. is employed in hir --tnMisrmnent, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a nenilvT of the Group fmurrnce Scheme and pay nrce"- sirv -rcDium in respect -rf him to the Life Insurance Cor- porat'im of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhnnce the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme rtppronriatelv, if th" bencfifs available to th6 em- r>>n'/-es under the said ScVme are enhanced, in that the benffltfi Pvr,i1-b1e un-W Ihi- Grnim Insurance Scheme are ninve ravOnr->blo to ihe employees than the K-nefits admis- ">rl~ un-iifr the said Scheir.e
43yi
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group In- surance Scheme, if on the death of an'employee the amount payable under this scheme be [as than Ihe amount that would be payable had employee been covered Lender the said Scheme, the employer shHll pay the difference to the legal heirlnominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment pf the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner. Maharashtra and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the inter- est of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the said esta- blishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the life Insurance Coiporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Schsrne we reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to bo cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, th© employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, ns fixed by the Life In- surance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if any made by the< employer in payment of premium the repsons,ibilitv for payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12, Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the errmioyer in relation to th* said establish- ment shall ens-in- prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominees/legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days of the receipt of the nun assured from the Life Insu- rance Correlation of India.
[No. S-35014 (321)]R2-PF.IT1
4392 THE GAZETTE OF INDI\ : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27,1904 [PART II—SHC. 3(U)]S.O. 4270.—WhcrCas Messrs Pelco Electronics and Elcctn- cals Limited, Loni Factories Lorn Kalbhoc, Pune-412201, (MH/26U8) (hcreimifter referred to as the said establishment) have applied ior exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (.19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to us the suid Act) ;
And whereas, th* Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoy- ment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of life Insurance which are more favourable to such employees than th" benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit- Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Schema);
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 -of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified m the Schedule annexed hereto, the CenLTHl Government herbey exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of
SCHEDU1 E
1. The employer in relation io the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Maharashtra (Bombay) maintain, such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) of Section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of everyi month.
3. AH expenses invoved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of nccounts, submission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. sJiall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shnil display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of tho rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Centrnl Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in the language of the majoiity of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who ii already a member of tho Employees' Provident Fuiid or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall Immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay neces- sary premium in respect >f him to the Life Insurance Cor- poration of India.
6. The employer shall arranRe to enhance the beneflti available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the em- ployees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employcos than the benefits admis- sible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Ipr surance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount ravable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra (Bombay) and- where any amendment is likely to affect
4393adversely the- mleict of the employees, the Regional PiO- uilent Mind Comm: jtmer shall belorc ghini; Lib uppiuwil gi\e a reasonable opportunity to the employees to cxpl-iin under then point of \ lev..
''. Where, for anv icison, the employee? of the said esta- h! -hment do not remain co\ciul under Lhe CirOLip TnsuK'nce Scheme of the I.ii'e Inuirani - Corpoiolion of India as already iivUipicd by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme JIC reduced in anv manner, the fxernp'jon 'hall hi liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the empoysr fails to pay the premimn etc. v,ithin the due date as fixfd by the Life In- surance Corporation of India, and the policy \i allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. Jn case of der.mlt, if any made by (he employei in pavmcit of premium liie rcp.ionsihilitv for payment of ossu- rmco benefits to the nominees or the legal hens of deceased riembrrs vihn would have been covered under the .said Scheme but for gru't oT this exemption, shall be thnt of the "rnolo^
12. Upon the death c>f the meinh.-i covered -under the Scheme the employfr in "-ela'ion to Ihe SHIM establish- ment shrii ensure pioinp'. payment of the ^iim a^Mireii to (he n-'n;n"c/Ie^1 Heirs entitled for it and in f>ny casr v.i hin 7 la-s of (he recpipt of the Mim a^surcM from the life Ingii- r 'lice Torp vntifin of fndi;i.
fNo, S-15ni4 (3291/R2-PF. Ill
S.O. 4271. Whre.is Messrs Pelco Electronics and Electri- c.ils Limited, Fimpn Factoiies, Plot SO, Bhosan Industrial F-- IM l'nne-411026 (MH/9599) fhercinaftcr refe-.red to as ihc said establishment) have applied for exemption under suh-se ition PA) of sod ion 17 of the tyrjployecs' Provident Funds, and W sccllaneous Provfsions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (herein,ifter leferrcd to as the said Act):
4394 THE GAZFTTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II -SEC. 3 Hi)]And wheicas, the Cen'ial Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, -without making any separate contribution oi payment of piemium, in enjoyment of benefits under 'he Gioup Insuiance Scheme of the T ite lnMiran.ee Coiporation of |ndin in the natmc of life Insu- iance which are more l.ivouiahie to Mich employees than the benefits admis'ibie undei the Fmployccs Deposit Linked Inswnncf Scheme, l')7h. (hcicinaflci refoned to cis the said Scheme);
Now, theicfoio, in excicisc of the powcis confcired by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said *\ct and subject to (he conditions specified in 'he Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government heieby exempts the said establishment from the operation of nil the provisions of the said Scheme for n pel iod of three years.
SCHFDUI H
1. Th"- employer in ielation to the said establishment shall submit Mich ictiutis tu the RcRional Provident Fund Com- missioner, M.ilitiiashtiM (Bombay), maintain such accounts and provide mch facilities foi inspection, is the C cntral Govern- ment may diiect liom time to lime.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the ("ential Government may. from time to time, direct under clause f.il of sub-section ( 1 \) of section 17 of the SHid Act, within 1? davr fiom the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the ndministintion of the Group Insuiance Scheme, invlmJinj? maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns payment of insurance premia, tiunsfer of accounts, payment of inspection chaicc< etc. shall he home by the employer.
4. The emplovci shall di-pkiy on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as appioved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith n translation of the salient fe.ituies thereof, in the language of the majoiitv of the employees.
.**. Wbeica.s an rmplovec, who is aheady a member of the I mployees" Pio\ideivt Fund or the Provident Fund of nn establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Gioup Insurance Scheme and pay necessaiy premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India
6. The employer shall ariaoge to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Gioup Insuiance Scheme appiopriately, if the benefits fufiilnble to the employees under the 'said Scheme ;iie enhanced, so that the bcrvfits available under the Gioup Insurance Scheme aie more favourable to -the employees than the benefits admissible i>ndei the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything conl.lined in the Group Insu- iance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme he less than the, amount that would he pav.ihle had employee been coveied under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the lepal heir/nominee of the employee as compentntion.
8. No amendment of the piovisions of the Group Insurance Scheme shall he made without the prior upproval of the R-egiorhil Pi in idem Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra (Bom- bay) and wheie any amendment is likely to affect adversely thc interest of the employees, the Regional Pi evident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his approval, give a reason- able opportunity to the employees to c\plain their point ol \ iew.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the said estab- lishment do not remain co\ered under the Gioup Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Coiporation of India as nlready adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme aie reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to he cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fnili to pay the premium etc within the ',lue date, as fi\ed by the Life Insurance C-orpoiation of Indi.i. ,md the policv is allowed to l.ipse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case o\ default, if am made b\ the employci in payment of piemium the lesponsihilju foi payment oL assu- rance b;ncfiti to the nomiiKci oi the legal heiis of deceased members who would have heen co\eied under the said Scheme but foi giant of this exemption, shall be that of the employe!.
12. .Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensuie piompt payment of the sum assiued to the nominee'legnl hciis entitled foi it and in any case within 7 day" of the receipt of the sum assured fioni the Life Insu- ifince Corporation of India.
[No. S-3.VI14 (33O)/H2-I'F. ll|
4395S.O. 4272.—Wheieas Messis Pelco Electionics and Fiecm- CMIS Limited, Kitlvva Factory. 3 MIDC Industrial Aica, Thane- Baiapur Road, Thunc-400601, (MH/9349) (heicinafler refei- lcd to as the said establishment) have applied toi exemption under sub-section i2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Acl, l'J52 (I1* or ]052) (hereinafter refcned to ;is the said Act) ;
And wheieas, the Ccntuil Government is satiblied that the employees of the said establishment arc, without making any separate contribution or payment oi" premium, in enjoyment of bcneiils under ihe Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature oi Life Insu- rance which are moie favourable to such employees than the benefit? admissible under the Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme);
Now. theiefoie, in e\ercit.e of the poweis confeired by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto.
the Cential Government hereby exempts the laid establishment fiom the opeiation of all the piovisiong of the said Scheme fni a period oi three year?.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in iclatiun lo the said, establishment shall submit such letuins to the Regional Piovidcnt Fund Com- missioner, Mahaiashtru I Bombay), maintain such accounts and provide such facilities foi inspection, as the icniinl Govern- ment may dnect froni time to time.
2. The employei shall pay such inspection ehaigcs as the Central Government may, from time to time, diiect under clause (a) of sub-section ( 3 \) of section 17 of the said Act, within 1? da^s fiom the cloic of every month.
3. A" expenses involved m ihe administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment ui insurance piemiu, ttatisfer of accounts, payment of inspection Charges etc shall be borne by the employees.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Hoaid of the establishment, a copy of the mlcs of the Gioup Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alonjjwith >i translation of the salient features thereof, in the language of ihe nujoiity of the employees.
.V Whereas an employee, who is alieady a member of the, Employees' Provident Fund or the Piovidcnt Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately emol him ns ft member of the Group Insmance Scheme and pay necessary premium in respect of him to the I ife Insurance Corporation of India.
fi. The employei shall anange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Gioup Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the cmployi.es under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Gioup Iniin.ince Scheme aie moie favourable to the employees than the henelils admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in ihe Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than Ihe amount that "would be payable had e-mployeo been coveied undci the said Scheme, the employer shall pav the difference to (lie legal heii'nominee of the employee as compensation,
K. Nt> amendment of the provisions of the Gioup insuuuiLe Scheme shall be m.idc without the piior approval of the Regional Pio,idem Fund Commission.T, ^fuharash^^a (Bom- bay) and whcie any amendment is likely to affect advcisely the inteiesl of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commissionei shall befoic (jiving his appioval. yivc a uason- ablc [ippoitunilv to the employees to explain iheir point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employers of the said estab- lishment do not remain covered under the Group Tnsuiance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as alrendv adopted bv the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme 3rc leduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the I ife Insurance Corporation of Tndia, and the policy is allowed to lapise, the exemption it liable U\ be cancelled
11. Tn case of default, if any made, bv the employer in payment of piemium the responsibility foi payment of assu- rance benefits to the nominees or the leKal heirs of deceased membei? who would have been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of thin exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the dealt) of the member covered under the Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment
4396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1904 [PART H--SEC . 3(ii>]*haU ensure prompt payment or the sum assured to the nominee/legal heirj entitled foi it and'in in any c.isc within 7 days of the receipt of the sum assured from the Life Insu- rance Corporation of India.
[No. S-35014 (33D/R2-PF. Ill
5.O, 4273.—Whereas Messrs Mahnrashtia State Handluoms Corpoiation Limited, 50, Centra] Avenue Ro^id, Nagpur-18 (MH/2893) (hcremalter ictcired to as the wid esiublishnient,) ha\c applied for'exemption under sub-<-cctioir (2A) of section 17 of the Employee!,' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Fiovisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1052) (hereinafter retcired to as the said Act) ;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insurance which arc more favourable to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employee* Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to ai the said Scheme);
Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returai to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Maharashtra (Bombay), maintain such account* and provide such facilities for lmpection, as the Centra] Ciovewment may direct horn time to time.
.1197
2. The emplo>er iball pav such inspection charge* at th* Ccntial Government may, from time to time, direct under cliui.se (a) of sub-section (3Al of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Gioup Jnsmance Scheme, including maintenance of ac- LviiiiTii, submission ot letunis, payment of instance prcmia, transfer ui recounts, payment of inspection charges etc, shall - lie iioine bj the employers.
4. The employer shall display on the Noliee Hoard of the establishment, u copy of the rules, ot the Group Insui- ance Scheme as appioved by the Central Government and, us and when amended, ;ilongwjlh a lianslalion of the salient k'ikiies then-o!, in llie language of flic majoiity of the employee*.
5. Whereas an employee, who is aheady a member of the Imployees* Provident Jt'und oi the Provident Fund, ot nn establishment exempted under the suid Act, is employed in his establishment, ihe employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group IiiMiiance Scheme and pay neccdvu y piemium in lesp'vt ol him to the Life Insurance Corpoiation of India.
b. I he employer shall jiranue to enhance; the benefit* available to the employees under the Group 'nsuiance Scheme iipprepilately, if the benefit1! available to the employees un- der the said Scheme ate enhanced, so that the benefits avail- able under the Gioup Insurance Scheme arc moie favour- able to the cmplojccs than the benefit's admissible under the 6nid Scheme,
4398 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART LI - S t c. 3(ii)jS,O. 4274.—Wheicas Messis Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Ntisik Division, P.O. Ojha lownship, Nasik: LMH/S266) (heieinatter lefened to us the said establishment) have applied foi exemption undei sue-scuion (2A) of section 17 or the hmployecs' Piovidenl Hind-, and Miscellaneous Pio- visions Act, JW2 (1'J ol 1952) (herein.ifiei icferred to us the saidlActJ ;
And whereas, the CVntial Government h .satisfied that the employees ot ihe said establishment a>e> without /linking any separate contribution or payment of piemium, in enjoy- ment of benehts undct the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Coiporution ot" India in Ihe nature of Life Insurance which arc more favourable to iucli employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Sibcme, 197b (hcicinafter icferrcd Li as ihe said Scheme);
Now, therefuiL', m ^xerci^e of the poweis conlcncd by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified hi Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government heieby exempts the SHid establish- ment from the operation of all the provisions of the tuid Scheme foi a period of itaree years.
SCHEDULE
1, The einployei in iclation to the said establishment thill submit such returns to 'he Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Mahurashlia. maintain such accounts and piovidc such facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may diiect from time to time.
2. The employer shall ,pay such inspection churges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (,i) of sub-section (3A) cf section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from ihe close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Gioup Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of leturns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employers.
4, The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rulei of the Group In- surance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a translation of the sailent features thrcof, ii> the language of the majority of (he employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Piovident Fund or ihe Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member ot the Group Insurance Scheme and pay nee-cssa.'j premium in iespea ol him Lo ihe Life insurance (. mediation ol India.
h The employer shall aiijnjje to enhance the benefits available to ihc employees under the Group InhLirancc Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the em- ployees undei the said Schem; are enhanced, so Ihat the htnefits available under ihe Group Insiuaiiee Scheme aie necessary premium m i .spcxt ol him to the 1 lie lnsuianee Corporation of India.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in tie Gioup In- suiance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less lhan the amount that would be payable had emplojee been covered under the snid Scheme, the employer shall pay Ihe difference io the leyal hui/nominee v(. the employee IB compensation.
H. No anieiulnient of ;hc piuvision% ot the Gioup ln- suiance Scheme shall be made without the prior approval ol ihe ReKional Provident Fund Commissioner, Mahaiashtra and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the inleiest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner shall before zhinx hie approval, give a leasonable opportunity to the employee* to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason", the employees of the i>aid es- tablishment do not remain covered under the Group In- .suiance Scheme of the Life Intufance Corporation of Indii us alicady adopted by the said ettablishment, or the bene- fit* to the employees under Ihi* Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption khall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, lor any reason, the employer fails to pay the piemium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Liic Insuinnce Corporation of India, iind (he policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if' any made by ihe employer in payment ol premium ihe iesponsibility for payment of fissurance benefits to the nomineei or the legal heirs of de- ceased members who would liave been covered under the "aid Scheme but for grant cf ihi* exemption, shall be that of the employ ei.
12, Upon the death of ihe member coveicd under the Scheme the employer in rclition to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the stim assured to the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and
[No. S-35014 (333)/82-PF. II]
4309S.O. 4275 Whereas Messis Hindustan Antibiotics, Pimpri, (hcein.ifici reteucd to ;is the s,iid establishment^ have jp- plicj for exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Fund', and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (1'J of 1952) (hereinaftei lefcucd to as the said Act l ;
And whereas, the Central (iov.srnn.ient is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without malcing any separate contribution or payment of picmium, in en- joyment of benefits under th: Grjup Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of Indii in the nature of Life Insurance which are more favourable to such employees that the benefits admissible under the Fmployccs Deposit- I inked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme) ;
Now, thercfoic, in cxeieise of the powers confeired by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all the provision? of the said Scheme for a period of three yean.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the naid establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Commissionei. IVfaharashirn, maintain .such accounts and piovide such facilities for inspection, as 1hc CVntial Govern- ment may direct I mm lime to time.
2. The employer shall pay sjch inspection charges as the Central Government may, fiom time to time, direct under clause fa) of sub-section (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month,
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of returns, payment of insurance premie, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the emyloyers.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group In- surance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and. as and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in ;he lanRuace of the majority of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Pro\ident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act. is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay nrccssary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of Tfidia.
6 The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Tnsuiance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the em- ployees under the "aid Scheme are enhanced, so that the henefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme nre more fnyournble to the employees than the benefits admis- sible under the said Scheme,
7. Notwithstanding an j thing contained in the Group In- suiance Scheme, if on Ihe dr;uh of an employe; the .unouni payable uudci this sch;mc be loss than the amount thai would be payable had jjupioyce been covered under the faid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference; 1o ^h': legal heir/nominee of tli.- employee aj cotnpcns.ition.
H. No jmendmeni of the provision1; of the Group In- Mirnucc Scheme shjll lie made without the prior appioval of Tlit? Remoniil I'luwdint Fund CommisMonei Mahjr "ishtui i'lid where jny amendment is likely to affect adveisely the in- Icifsl of the cmploveus. the Regionjl Fiovidenl Fund Com- missioner shnll bcfoie giving hii appioval, jjivc (i reasonable opportunity to the employers to explain their point of view.
lJ. Where, for any leason, Ihc employee? of Ihc said ev tublishrncnt do not remain covered under the Group Jn- -lurjnce Scheme of the I ife lnsuran;e Corporation of India as already adopted hv the s.iid t's:ablkhmcnt, or the bene- fits (o the employees under this Scheme are reduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. vithin the due date, ;is fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, nnd the poli.-v is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In caic of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of as^mancc benefits to the nominees or the legal hoirs of de- ceased members who would hive been covered under ihe said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, dhall be that of the emplojei.
12. Upon the death of Ihe member covered under tho Scheme the employer in rel.ition to the said establishment shnll ensure prompt paymem of the sum assured to the nominee/legal heirs entitled for it and in any ease within 7 days of the receipt of Ihe 511m assured from toe Life Insurance Corporation of India.
[No. S-350J4 (3391/82-PF. IT|
4401S.O. 4276.—Whcicas Messrs Maharashtra State Handlooms Co.-po ntion Limited, JO, Ceitial AveL.iie Road, Writ;pur-18 (NHI/14704) (hciein.iflcr refcricd to as the said establishment.) have .jppli^j foi exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the l-rni'loytes Piov.dcnt Funds and Misc-Iljneovib p f%vi iins *ct, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter refened to iis the said Act);
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment me, williout making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in en- joyment of benefits under 'he Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corpoialion of India in the nature of Life Insmance which arc more favourable to such em- ployees than the benefits admissible under the Ercplnyees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter lefeired to as the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise cf the powers conferred by sub-soction (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule onnexrd 'here- to, the Central Government hereby exempts the said estab- lishment from the operation of all the provisions of the laid Scheme for a peiiod of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in Ielation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Rcpion.il Provident FunJ Com- missioner, Mdhiirashdn (Bombay), maintain such accounts and piovidc such facilities for inspection, as the Central Coveinment ni;>y dhect fiom time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as (he Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause fa) of sub-section (3 A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, submission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc shall he borne by the employeis.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the i tiles of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, m the language of the majority of the employees.
5. Whereas the employee, who is already a member of the Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme nnd pay neces- sary premium in respect of him to the life Insurance Cor- norntion of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme apporpriately, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme arc enh need, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under tbe said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group In- surance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would he payable had employee been covered under the snid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to ihe lepal heir/no- nvnec of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insurance ^•cheme shall be made without the prior hpnroval of the Regional Provident Fund Commimione'-. Mahnrnshtia (Bom- bay) and where any amendment is likely to affrot adve-'H1' (he interest of the employees, the Regionil Provident Fund Commissioner shall before jrfvinj; his approval, cive a reason- ab'c oppo'trinity to the employees to explain
11. In case of default, if anv made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of as- surance benefits to the nominees or the le^al heiis of deceased r"cn bers who would have been covered under the said kchenjc but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme the emjfloyer in relation to (he said es'abiisrmcnt shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee /legal heirs entitled for it and in any casr w''hii 7 d"Vs of The receipt of the sum aspired from th.e Life Insurance Corporation nf India.
[No, S. 35014(340)/82-PF, II]
4402 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27,1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]S.O. 4277.—Whereas Mcasra KamanI Tubes Limited. Lai Bahadur Shastri Marg, Kurla, Bombay-70 (MH/5291) (here- inafter referred to as the said establishment) have applied for exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 or the Em- ployers' Piovident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) ; And whereas, the Central Government is> satisfied that the employees of the said establishment axe, without making any separate contributions or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits under tho Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insurance which ire more favourable to such employees than the benefits atfmi MVIC under the Emplovre<; Deposit-Link Insurance Scheme, 1^76 (hncinaftei r ferred to ag the said Scheme);
Now, thereff>ie, in exercise of the rowers confeiTed by sub-section C2A) of section 17 of the ?afd Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establishment from thf opcr:tfion of nil the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDUI.F
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment "rmll tubmit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Mnhnrrsbtra (Bombay), maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, a9 the Central Govern- ment may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pav f.uch inspection charRcs as thrt Central Government may, fiom lime to time, direct under clause- fa) of sub-action (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administration of the Grourv Insurance Scheme, including maintcnarre of accounts, submission of reform, pavment of insurance prcmia, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be fcoroe by the employers.
4. The employer display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a tianslation of the salient features thereof, in the language of the majotity of the employees,
5. Whereas the employee, ivho is already a member of the Empluyees Provident Funj or the Provident Fund of an esta- blishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary rremimvjm in respect of him to (he Life Insiuance Corpo- i ation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme are enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme- are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir[nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Insu- rance Scheme shall be mode without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, IVtnhirashtra (Bombay) and where any amendment is likely lo affect adversely 1he interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before K'vinS h:s approval, give a rcason- nh1e opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Whcir, for any reason, the employees of the laid estab- lishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Li'fe Insurance Corporation of Iridia as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to t he employers under this Scheme are reduced to any manner, the exemption shrill be liable to be cancelled.
10. Where, for anv reason, the emplover fails to pav the prcmimum within the due dflte, as fixed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In ewe. of default, if any mad* by the enrolover in n lyment of premium tbe responsibility for payment of assurance benefits to the nominees or the lepn] hriri of de- cea'"I members who would have been covered under the "iid Schemo but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under th" Scheme the employer in relation to tho said establishment shall cmurfi mompf navment of the sum assured to the nommeel Wnl heirs entifird for it and in anv case within 7 dav^ of the interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Corporation of India,
[No. S-35014 f341)/82-PF. II]
4403S.O. 4278.—Wheieas Messrs Salem Textiles Limited, Salli- rjltiyum, Njusingdpuum 1'osi orticc, Atiur Saiem District IUN/6517) (heiemauer iclerrcd li> as Lhe said establishment) h.i\e applied 101 exemption under sub-section 1.2A) of section 17 t,f ihe limploycLS i'rovidcnt Fundi and Miscellaneous Fiovisions Act, 1932 (l'J of 1932J ^hereinafter reieired to as Ihc said Act) ;
And whereas, the Centiul Government is satisfied that the roipiojecs of the said establishment aie, without making any ssparate contribution* or paymeDt of premium, in en- joyment of bcnclits unJer the Group Insurance Schemo of the Life Insurance Corpoi ation of India in the nature of Liie insurance which arc .-nore lavourable to such employee* than the benefits admissible under [he Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, iy76 (hereinafter referred to at the suid Scheme);
Now, thcrcloie, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government hereby exempts lie said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the taid Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer m relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, 'I a mil Nadu, maintain such accounts and provide for such facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as (he Central Government may, from time to time, diiect under clause (a) of sub-section (3A) ot Section 17 of the said Act, witbin. 15 days from the close of every month.
3- All expenses involved in the administration of the Gro'ip Insurance Scheme, including Maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment of insurance premie, transfer of accounts, payment of inspection chargei, etc. shall be born* by the employer.
4. The employer (hall di&play on the Notice Board of the establishment, a copy of tho rules of the Group Insu- lance Scheme as approved by the Central Government and as and when amended alongwith a translation of the salient features thereof, in lh" language of the majority of th" employees.
5. Wheieas an employee, who is already a member of the bmployees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the "nid Act, is employed in his eslablishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him a* a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay necessary premium in iespect of him to the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits available to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme impropriately, if the benefits available to the employees linder (he snid Scheme me enhanced, to that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the saia Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insu- rance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employe* been covered under the said scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the
- legal heir/nominee of the employee ns compensation.
8. No amendment of the twoviMons of the Group Insurance Scheme ihall bo made without th" prior npnroval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Tamil Nadu and where anv amendment is likelv to affect adversely the interest of the em.ilovees, ihe Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner sliMl before givine his approval, give a reaionnble opportunity 1o the employees to explain their point of view.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the taid establishment do not remain covered uM?r the Groun Tn- swance Scheme of the T.ife Imuranre Corporation of India a3 already adopted by the establishment, or the benefits to
4404 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1902/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]the employees under this Scheme are reduced to Buy manner, the exemption uhall be luble lo bs cancelled.
10. Where, for any re^scn, the employer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insu- ance Corporation of Tndia, and the policy ie t Ho wed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
11. In case of default, if ^ny made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assu- rance beneiitj to lhc nominees or Ihe legal heirs of deceased members who would, hu\c been covered under the said Scheme but for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme, the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominee /legal hrirs entitled for it and in nny case within 7 days of the receipt of the: sum assured from the Life Insu- rance Corporation of India.
[No. S-35014 (342)/82-PK II]
S.O. 4279.—Whereas Messis Hoechst Dyes' and Chemicals Limited, Hoechst House, Nariman Point, Bombay-21, (MH/ d.527) (hereinafter referred to as the o_aid establishment) have applied tor exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17
And wherein, the Central Government is satisfied thut the employees of the said establishment are, without making any separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits under the Group 'nsutance Scheme of the Life Insurance Coiporation of India in the nature of life ins'j- lrfncc which me more favourable to such employees than
4405the benefits admissible Uiiiei the tinployees Deposit-Linked insurance Scheme, 1976, (hucinnfter rcterxed to as the said Scheme )\
12 Upon the death of the member covtied under the Scheme, the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum aisuied to the nomi- nee/legal heirs entitled 'Jor it nnd in any case vvi'hin 7 day* of the receipt of the sum asiuitd from the Life Insurance C orporation of India.
[No. S-150U (343>/82-PF. Ill Now, theiefors, in exercise of the powers confened by sub-section (2A) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule 'annexed heieto, the Central Government hereby exempts the said establish- ment from the operation of all tho provision^ of the said Scheme for a petiod of thiee >ear"
SCHEDULE
I. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall •ubmit sucii returns to ihe Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Bangalore, maintain such accounts and piovide for such facilities tor inspection, as the Central Government may diiect fiom time to time.
2 The employer shall pay Ditch inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (a)"of sub-tcction <3A) of Section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses invohed in the administration of the Gtoup Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts, sub- mission of returns, pi.mcnt of insurance prcmia, transfei of accounts, payment of inspection charges etc. shall be borne by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the Notice Board of the establishment, a, copy of the rules of the Group Insurance Scheme as approved by the Centi.il Government and as and when amended alonjtwith a transition of the salient features thereof, in the language of the majority of the employees.
5. Whereas an employee, who is already a member of tha Employees' Provident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, i8 employed in his establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the- Group Insurance Scheme and pay neces- sary premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Cor- poration of India.
6. The employer shall ai range to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under Jie Group Insunance Scheme appropriately, if the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme aie enhanced, HO that the benefits availablo under the Group Insiuance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits cdmisaiblc under the said Schem*.
7. Notwithstanding auythiiij, contained in the Group In- lurance Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the leqal heir/ nominee of the employee as compensation.
8. No amendment of the provisions of the Group Invu- ranc<* Scheme shill be made without the piioi approval of the Regional Pi evident Fu'U Csntmis&ioner, Katnataka and wbtre any imeudmeni is likely to affect adversely the inier- est of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner shall before giving his approval, give a reasonable opportunity to the employee* to cxoLiin their point of vie*'.
9. Where, for any reason, the employees of the oaid esta- blishment do not remain cohered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life In uratiec Corporation of India as already adopted by the nstablishmcni, or the benefits to the em- ployees under this Scheme ate reduced to any manner, the exemption shall be liable M be cancelled
10. Wheic foi any ref-on, the empoyei f^il, to piv the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insu- rance Coiporation of India, and the policy is allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled.
II. Tn ca*e of default, if auy made by
•pavment of nreminni fhs 'csprin"ibilit" for navm-^nt nf nssu- lance benefit to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would, Jnvc been covered under the said Scheme but for gram of thi, exemption, ihall be (hat of the employer
4406 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA27, 1904 [PART II—SEC. 3(-ii)]S.O. 4280. Wtieiws Messrs Hotel Oberoi Towers, Nariman Point, Borabay-2, (MH/15448) (hereinafter refened to as the said establishment) have applied foi exemption under sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 11J51 iJ9 of 1952), (hereinaftci referred to as the said Act);
And wheieas, the Central Government is satisfied that the employees of the said establishment are, without making an> separate contribution or payment of premium, in enjoyment of benefits undei the Gioup Insurance Scheme of the Life Insuiancc Corporation of India in the nature of Life Insur- ance which arc move favow able to such employees than the benefits admissible under the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Scheme);
Now, therefore, in exercise of Lhe powers conferred by sub-section (2A) of section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, the Cenlul Government hereby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme for a period of three years.
SCHEDULE
1. The employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Com- missioner, Maharashtra, maintain such accounts and provide such facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time.
2. The employer shall pay such inspection charges as the Central Government may, from time to time, direct under clause (a) of sub-scctiou (3A) of section 17 of the said Act, within 15 days from the close of every month.
3. All expenses involved in the administiation of the Group lnsuiance scheme, including mainLeiiance ol accounts, sub- mission of returns, payment of insuianix premia, transfer of amounts, payment oi inspection charges etc. shall be DOrnc by the employer.
4. The employer shall display on the .Notice Board ot tne the said Scheme arc- enhanced, so that the benefits available Scheme as approved by the Central Government and, as and when amended, alongwith a tiauslalion of the saliet features thereof, m the language of the majority of the employees.
5. Where an employee, who is already a member of the ljnptoyees' Piovident Fund or the Provident Fund of an establishment exempted under the said Act, is employed in his estab.lishm.ent, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the Group Insurance Scheme and pay neces- saiy premium in respect of him to the Life Insurance Corpo- ration of India-
6. The employer shall arrange to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under the Group Insurance Scheme appropriately, it the benefits available to the employees under the said Scheme arc enhanced, so that the benefits available under the Group Insurance Scheme are more favourable to the employees than the benefits admissible under the said Scheme.
7. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Group Insur- ance Scheme, it on the death of an employee the amount payable under this scheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the "aid Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the lefial heirs/ nominees of the employee as compensation.
8. No nmendment of the provisions of the Group Insurance •Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra and where any amendment is likely to affect adversely the interest of the employees, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner shall before giving his approval, give a icasonable opportunity to the employees to explain their point of view.
!). Where, for any reason, the employees of the said estab- lishment do not remain covered under the Group Insurance Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as already adopted by the said establishment, or the benefits to the employees under this Scheme we reduced in any manner, tho exemption shall be liable to be cancelled.
10. Whore, for any reason, the emplcyer fails to pay the premium etc. within the due date, as fixed by the Life Insur- ance benefits to tho nominees or the legal heirs of deceased the exemption to liable to be cancelled.
11. Tn case of default, if any, made by the employer in payment of premium the responsibility for payment of assur- ance benefits to the nominees or the legal heirs of deceased members who would have been covered under the said Scheme hut for grant of this exemption, shall be that of the employer.
12. Upon the death of the member covered under the Scheme (he employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensme prompt payment of the sum assured to the nominees/legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days of (he receipt of the sum assured fiom the Life Insur- ance Corporation of India.
[No. S-35O14(389)/82-PFJIl
4407S.O, 42HI..—-In exercise of the powers confcned by sub- section (3) of section 1 of ilic Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 194R), the Ctntral Government hereby ap- points the 5th December, 1982 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapters V and VI (except •sub-section (1) of section 7fi and sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have aliendy been brought into foice) of (he said Act shall come into f'oicc in the following aieas in the Slate of Kerala namely :—•
"The areas within the Revenue village of Ptizbassi in
Tellicherrv Taluk of Cannanore District."
[No. S-38O13/3VS2-HI]
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 1982
S.O. 4282.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 88 read with section 91A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees ot the Central Workshop, Laundry and the Department of Rehabilitation and Artificial Limbs of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from the operation of the said Act for a period with effect from 10th March, 1977 upto and inclusive of the 30th September, 1982.
The above exemption is subject to the following conditions,
namely :—
(1) The aforesaid factory wherein the employees aic employed shall maintain a register showing the names and designations of the exempted employees;
(2) Notwithstanding this exemption, the employees shall continue tp receive such benefits under the said Act to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from which exemption granted by this notifica- tion operates;
O) The contributions for ihe exempted period, if already
paid, shall not be refunded;
(4) The employer of the said .factory shall submit in respect of the period during which lhat factory was subject to the operation of the said Act (hereinafter referred to as the said period), such returns in such • form and containing such particulars as ""were due from it in respect of the said period under the Employees' State Insurance (General) Reculatkins 1950;
!<0 Any Inspector appointed by the Corporation under sub-section (1) of section 45 of the said Act, or
4408 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 18, 1982/AGRAHAYANA 27, 1904 [PART I I- Sec. 3(ii)]fuipish. to him mch infoimation as he mny con- sidor necessary; or
o'.her official of tho Coiporation authorised in ill , behalf shall, for the purposes of—
(0 verifying the particulars contained" in any return submitted under sub-section (1) of section 44 for the .said period; or
(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his aflent or servant, or any person found in such factory, establishment, office or other pre- mises or any person whom the said Inspector or other official has reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee; or (ii) .\sceitaininB whether resistors and records Nveie maintained as required by the Employees' S*ale Insmance (Geneial) Regulations, 1W0 for the said period; or
(d) make copies of or take ex'racts from, any lcgis- ler, account book or other document maintained in such factory, establishment, office or other premises.
[No. S-38014/26/RO-HT1
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (lii) ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer in cash and kind beine benefits in consideration of which exemption is being granted under this notification: or
(iv) ascertaining whether an> of the provisions of the Act had been complied with duriotr the period when such provisions were in force in relation to the raid factory be empowered to—
It has become necessary to give rctiospective effect to the exemption in this case as the application for exemption was iecrived lale However, it is certified thi't the grant of exemp- tion with retioipectivc effect Will not affect the interest of anybody adversely,
CORRIGENDUM (n) require the principal or immediate employer to furnish to him such information as he n ay r.onsidei necessary ; or
New Delhi, the 2i"] December, 1982
S.O. 4283.—In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of [ abom No. S.O. 2599 dated the 21st Jiii.e, 1982 published at page 2672 of the Gazette of India Part II, Section 3 Sub-section (ii) dated the 17th July, 1982, ki line ?, for "foyti" lead "Jvoti1'
(.b) enter any factory, establishment, office or other premises occupied by such principal or imme- diate employer at any reasonable time and IC quire any person found incharge thereof to produce to such inspector or other official and allow him to examine such accounts, books und othei documents relating to the employ- ment of persons nnd payment of wages or to
[No. S-35019(98)/8?.-PF.IIl A K. BHATTARAI, Un.ler Sccv.
PRINTED BY THE MANAOERj GOVT. OF INDIA PRESS. RING ROAD, NEW DELHI-11J064
AND PUBLISHED HY THE CONTROLLER OF PUBLICATIONS, DELHI-110O54J 1 9 82
- The monogram of the India* Standard Institution, consisting of letters "ISI , drawn in the exact stylo and relativo propor- tions as indicated in Col. (2); the number of the Indium Standard, alongwith it) being- superscribed on the top side of the monogram as in- dicated in the design. [No. CMD/13 : 9] ↩
- , herein- after referred to as "the Project", was undertaken by the Boaid for improvement of the River Bhagjrathi-Hooghly from the G.mga off take to the SOJ. The Chief Hydraulic Engi- neer was made overall incharjje of the Project apart from being the overall incharge of the Hydraulic Study Depart- ment. Two schemes were taken up under the Pi eject—(i) Coirective Woiks and River Training Works* in the river Ehag.r tthi-Hooghly and (,ii) Corrective Woiks and River Training Works in the Estuary below Diamond Harbour. Foi execution of the work of the Project four temporal y pus-is of Junior Draftsman and six tempoiary posts of tracers wore created in &ame year 1968. Mr. D. P. Bhattacharya was piomoted to (ho post of Junior Draftsman in the Project with effect fiom 1st September, 1975. I have already said that he was a tracer in that very Project from 5th August, 1968. He worked in Calcutta us a Junior Diaftsman having been promoted in 1975 under the Engineer on Spot Duty at the Project establishment a 20, Garden Reach Road. Calcutta. Thus it is clear that Mr. Bhahacharya was working in the Project right from the year 1968 and while posted there was promoted to the post of Junior Draftsman in the Pro- ject in the year 1975. At that time he was, therefore, a staff of thfl Project and not of the Hydraulic Study, Depart- ment. It appears that the Depuy Chief Engineer, River Train- ing i.e., one of the principal officers of ihe Project, proposed to fill up a post of Junior Draftsman in the Project, which was originally created under Board's Resolution No. 1140 dated 30th July, 1968 and for that purpose he sent a letter bearing No. RT|X1I[E|2[2001 dated 22nd January, 1979. Since the total woik load of the Project was not adequate for the existing four Junior Draftsman, it was felt that instead of filling up another post, It would be desirable to redistri- bute and reallocate the work of these personnel to achieve efficiency and economy. With this object in view Shri D. P. Bhattacharya, Junior Draftsman of the Project was propos- ed to be placed under the Deputy Chief Engineer, River Training with efFect from 15th February. 1979 under an Office Order bearing No. HSD/64/11/321 dated 7th Febru- ary, 1979. Ultimately, however, Sri Bhattacharyay could not be placed under the Deputy Chief Engineer, River Training. He remains in Iho same office, where he was sitting since 1st September. 1975. His duties included the work in con- nection with Civil and Structural Drawings forwarded by the Deputy Chief Engineer, River Training. The Union opposed the arrangement of redistribution of reallocation of the work of Draftsman of the Project which had been mentioned in the office order dated 7th February, 1979 on tho impres- sion that D. P. Bhattacbaryay was tht staff of the Hydraulic Study department and not of the Project. This impression of the Union was wrong and certainly a misplaced one. In fuct Mr. Bhattacharyay was working continuously in the Project sin'-e 5th August, 1968 against the post created by the management under Resolution dated 30th July, 1968. It is The right of the management, I think, to redistribute and reallocate the work and its staff under the Project for tie purpose of achieving efficiency and economy. Mr. Bhatta- cbaryay became Junior Draftsman in 1975. Mr. Mitra who has made a grievance in the present case joined the Project us a trscer with effect from 12th April, 1976 on his transfer from Haldia Dock Project. Tho post which he joined had nUo been treated in the mT>°a resolution dated 30th July, 1968. So ihere is no question of ignoring his claim. Even if it be, be can have no grievance in the circumstances stated above. There i? no malice, no malafide. no victimi- sation on the part of the management in promoting Mr. Bhattacbaryay to the poat of Junior Draftsman. Mr. Mitra was even in exfstenre as a tracer in the River Training Wirnr when Mr. Bhatfacharyay was promoted as Junior Draftsman in the year 1975. Furthermore, it will appear from the written statement of the workman himself that the River Training Wing b not a separate department. In para- graph 1 of their written statement the workman stated that Hydrulic Study Department Is one of the department of the 3. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Ministry aJ required under Sec. 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. ↩
- id area) white the estimated cort of Type II house is Rs. 11,325—Rs. 13,425 in black cotton or swelly coil area. The estimated co«t of house under Build Your Own House Scheme i» Rs. 1500—(R«. 500 i« paid as subsidy and Rs. 900 as intercst-fiee Iaon). 2, The Central Advisory Board had constituted a Sub- committee to review the Housing Programme!. The report has been received and is under examination. Welfare activities.—The Welfare activities vnder different heads financed during the year from thfi welfare funds ai« indicated below :— 3. Under the various housing schemes, a total number of 12,980 hou«es had been sanctioned for construction from the inception of trie Fund. Out of Ihese 11,549- houses have so far been completed and 420 hou«e» are under construc- tion. The total expenditure, from the Fund for providing housing facilities in the vear -under report wai R«, 24.27 laklw. (i) Medical facilities—Medical facilities to iron ore and mangancbt ore workers setting a basic pay of Rs. 1,000 per month and their dependents were provided free by the organisation. Facilities were made available to the workeri and their dependent* in the following hospitals /dispeniarles etc. established by the* Organisation in different iron ore/ manganese ore producing states. BIHAR.—(1) Central Hospital, Barajamda (50 beds). (2) Mobile- Medical Dispensary, Barajamda. (3) Static Allopathic Dispensary, Karnmpadtt. (4) Static Allopathic Dispensary, Nuia. (iii) Water iupply facilities.—Out of 43 water «upply schemes sanctioned in various regioni since the inception of the Fund. 33 water supply schemes are in operation. The rest were reportedly in progress. 85 wells have eo far been sunk in the different regioni. The total expenditure on water tupply schemet during the yenr under report wa* KJ. 18,06 lakh a. ORISSA.—(1) Central Hospital, Joda (50 beds). (2) Primary Health Centre, Jaruri. (3) Mobile Medical Dispensary, Barbfl. (4) Primary Health Centre, Nuagapn. (5) Static-cum-Mo'iiilc Medical Unit at MfldampTiMi. (6) Primary Health Centre, TomLa. (7) Primary Health Centre, Siljore. MAHARASHTRA.—(1> Prirr.ury Health Centre, redi (Distt. Sindhudurg). During the period under repor', an integrated Water Say- ply Schwnc costing a tnlal of R«. 2.08 crores on Vaitranl Valley in Orissu has* been sanctioned. 50 per cent of th« total cost on this scheme will be borne by the Central Government out of th;j Iron Ore Mines and Manganese Ore Mines labour Welfare Fund. A sum of Rs. 16.50 lakh« have been released to tic State Government during 1981-82. Ths State Government will be the agency for execution of tb.3 scheme, MADHYA PRADESH— (1) Mobile Medical Dispensary, Rajhara. (21 Mobile Medical Di»P?nsary, Bailadiln (Deposit No. 5). (3) Mobile Medical Dispensary. Baihdila (Deposit No. 14). K A R N A T A K A . - -( 1) Centr.il Hospital, Kariganur (25 bedi). (2) Mobile Medical Diflpcnsary, Kariganur. (3) Static-cum-MobUe Medical Dispennary, Sandum. GOA.—(1) Central Hospital, Pillicm, Darbandora, Tiska Goa (50 beds). (2) Static-cum-Mobilc Medical Dwpeniary, CuTchorem. (i\) Educational nnd recreational facilities.—The educa- tional and recreational facilities provided to the iron/manga- nese ore mine workers arid their families which were financed from the Fund included 40 MultinuTose. Institutes, 2 Welfare Centres, 6 Womcn-cunvChildren Welfare Centres, 13 Cinema Units, 1 Holiday Homo, 159 Radio Centres and three Trans- port Buses. Grants-inlaid were sanctioned to mine ownen for ors'imising sports, ganiei, tournaments etc. in tie Madhy* Pradesh repion. Scholirships continued to be given to the children of iron/manganese ore minei workers studvinp; in schools, colleges and tcthnicul institution-, in accordance with the approved scheme. The mid-dnv meals scheme for the school children was continued in Madhva Pradesh, Gca, Oriwn nnd Bihar regions. This scheme Tini also been infrort-iccd fn Maharashtra region. The rnte for supplv of nni-Jny rnpals 13 75 puke per child rer day, Uniforms were nUo sup]>Iisd to the Primary school goin^ children of iron cr« miners in some regions. The total amount ^ncnt on these fncililies dicing the yer: under report was about R». 20.71 luths. (c) FATAl- AND SERIOUS ACCIDENT BENEFIT SCHEME The scheme for financial benefits to widows and children of victims of accidents wa? also continued during the year under report. PART n Besides, beds wcte continued to be reserved for the exclu- sive use of Iron/Manpane^c Ore mine* and their families in T. B. Sanatoria find uthci hospitals. 45 auch bed* for Mhar region and 32 beds for Oiisoa region are ovailnble in the Mahadevi BirU Sanatorium, Ranchi. Similarly, 2 beds imve also been reserved at Sl. Lukes Hospital, Venfirirla fn Maharashtra. In Madhva Pradesh. 4 beds were reserved In the Bhilai mnin hospltnl of tho Hindustan Sttel Ltd. slid 5 general beds were reserved in the DUtt. Heat'quarfrro Hospital at Keonjhnr for the u&e o£ miner? and their depen- dents. The service* of a part-time doctor were continued providing of nvjdical facilities to the fron Ore Mines and M a r i n es Ore Min-is W o t t oi in Andhra Pradesh. OpenlnR balance a? on 1ft April. 1981 1,83,83,860.98 Receipt during the year 1981-82 1,85,56,116.36 Expenditure during the year 1981-8?. I 34,08,884.17 Olosinf balance m on 31st Msrch, 19S2 2,35,11,093.17 A proposal to ".ftt up » 50 bedded hospital at B'alaghat, PART HI Madhyu Pradesh Via* been approved In principle, The owners of the iron oic mines or manjjane^e ore rrcinw who maintain the dispensaries wid hiifpitah up tn the prescrib- ed stftiidLird have, been paid annual RTMIU in-ald. Eatirratts of receipts and cvpenrtiturs fitr the yew 1982-83 1. Estimated recfipts 1,80,00,000.00 2, Estimated expenditure 2,06,13,000.00 \ total expenditure «f Rs. 57.81 lakhs ws^ incurred on the, pro\i↩
- !, payment (.1 impettum tluigei tw shall be bonic by the emplojci 4 lhe tinpluver ilull dispUj on \}\t Noiw* Bodid ot the Oslablishini.nl) a <-opy of the rulew of ci: vvho n ilieid> a rnLinber of I he Employees' Providcni Fund or the Provident Fund of An establishment exempted under lhe Bdid Act, u employed in his est ibbshment the employer shall immediately enrol hmi us a member ot the Oroup Insurance Scheme, and pa> necessarv piemium m TCSPLLL ul him IO the I ife Tnsu- i int.c Corporation of ftidia 6 I he cmplojer "ihall ananse to enhance the benefits avail- able to the employees under the Oroup Insurance Scheme ap propuiileli if the beneliti available to tho employees undei the iaid Scheme aie enhanced v> lhat the benefit * available under the Omup Insurance Stheine me moLt fii\ourible to the emplovces thin the hei efiK irlmi'-sihle nncki the '.aid Scheme 7 NotwJth^tundln^{ my hing contained in the Group In^i. - i mcc Scheme if on the deith of an employee the amount pL\ablc imdet thK scheme be ie<;=. than (be amount thai v.on] 1 K pi),blf bad eirfrilo\re hecn covered \mder rhc «aid ^benw. tie impkser ^ha!l unv the difference *t he »fg«l heii/noinmei v>f the et)iplo\ct m compel i 'ti >n ↩
- Tlie employe) in relation to the said establishment shall iuhmit Mich return* to the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner. Tamilnadu. mainlain inch accounts and provide nuch facilities for inspection, as the Central Government may direct from time to time. ↩
- years. SCHEDULE 1. J"he employer in relation to the said establishment shall submit such returns to the Regional Provident Fund Commis- sioner, Hyderabad. Andhr.n Pradesh, maintain such accounts find providfc inch facilities for inspection, as the Central Govern- ment may diiect f-om time to time. 2. The employer shall pay such inspection chaigej as the Central Government may, from time 'to time, direct under clauie fa) of sub-section f3A) of section 17 of the s.iid Act within 15 days from ihe close of every month 3. All expenses involved in the administration of Ihe Group Insurance Scheme, including maintenance of accounts submission of returns, payment of insurance premia, transfer of accounts, payment • of inspection charges etc. shall be bomr- by the employ«r. ↩
- ', iihstanding anyibing contained in the Group In- suiancc Scheme, if on the death of an employee the amount payable under this NCheme be less than the amount that would be payable had employee been covered under the said Scheme, the employer shall pay the difference to the legal heir/nominee of th; employee as-compensation. 8. No amendment of t'lr- provisions of the Ciioup Insiit- ancc Scheme shall be made without the prior approval of ihe Rcs-onni Fiovident Fund Commii^Toner, Maharashtra (Bombay) and whem any amendment is likely \o uflsci adver- sely [lie inteitst of the cmplojees, the Regional Piovident l - u nd k i i r i i m i s s i o n t ir ' h a ll b c f o ic y K i ng h i, . i p p r o v j l, n i ^e a reasonable oppo'tunily io the employees to explain then point of vicv\. 9. Wheie, foi Hiiy reaion, the employees ot the Raid eslab- lishmcnt do not remain coveied under the Gfoup Insuraaco Scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation of India as al- ready adopted by the said establuhment, or the benefits to the employees under Ihis Scheme arc reduced in anv manner, the extmption shall be liable to be cancelled. H). Where, for any reason, the employer fails to pay the premimum etc, within the due date, as fixed by thc Life Insurance Corporation of Tndia, end the policy ii allowed to lapse, the exemption is liable to be cancelled. 11. In ca?e of default, if any made by the employer in payment of premium (lie tesponsibility for payment of as- surance benefit* to the nominees or Ihe legal heirs of de- ceased members who would have been covered under the «;aid Scheme but for Rrant of this exemption, shall be that of th« employer, 12. Upon the death of the member covered under thc Scheme the employer in relation to the said establishment shall ensure prompt payment of the sum fissured to the no- mince /legal heirs entitled for it and in any case within 7 days o£ the receipt of thc sum assured from the Life Insurance Corporation of India. [No. S-35014 (332)/8M>F II] ↩
- ; under this Scheme are ieduced in any manner, the exemption shall be liable tn be cancelled. 10 Whrre. for ary reason, trie employer fails to pay the prpmiiT-n etc. with-'n the due date, as fixed by the Life In- -nrnnce Tornorafion of Tndia. and the policy is allowed to 1'ipsc, the exemption is liable to be cancelled. 1042 GI/ * 2—T; ↩