राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शुक्रवार, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 27th February, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rajinder Sharma s/o Sh. Shiv Kumar, H. No. 863, 185-राजपत्र/2017-08-12-2017 (8657) 8658 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 Pather Wali Kothi, Near M.C. Office, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Maxpower Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 20B, Sector-2, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 7-9/201, dated 17-01-2017 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Rajinder Sharma s/o Sh. Shiv Kumar, H. No. 863, Pather Wali Kothi, Near M.C. Office, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana w.e.f. 24-9-2015 by the Employer/ Managing Director, M/S Maxpower Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 20B, Sector-2, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P. allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Additional Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd February, 2017
No.: 11-1/10(Lab) ID/2017/Theog.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravinder Singh s/o Sh. Narain Singh Negi, Village- Bajroli, P.O. Balghar, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P. and (i) The Director, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. 518, J.P. Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. (ii) The Manager, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. Village & P.O. Balghar, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
8659 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 7-9/201, dated- 17-01-2017 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Ravinder Singh s/o Sh. Narain Singh Negi, Village- Bajroli, P. O. Balghar, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P. w.e.f. 01.01.2016 by the Employer/Managing Director, i) The Director, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. 518, J. P. Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. and ii) The Manager, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. Village & P. O. Balghar, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H. P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Additional Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd February, 2017
No.: 11-1/10(Lab) ID/2017/Theog.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Shashi Kant Thakur s/o Dr. V.P. Thakur, Village- Narain, P.O. Bagri, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P. and (i) The Director, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. 518, J.P. Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. (ii) The Manager, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. Village & P.O. Balghar, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 7-9/201, 8660 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 dated 17-01-2017 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Shashi Kant Thakur s/o Dr. V.P. Thakur, Village- Narain, P.O. Bagri, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P. w.e.f. 01.01.2016 by the Employer/ Managing Director, (i) The Director, M/s Him Agri Fresh Pvt. ltd. 518, J.P. Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. and (ii) The Manager, M/s Him Agri Fresh pvt. ltd. Village & P.O. Balghar, Tehsil Theog, Distt. Shimla, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Additional Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st March, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Hem Raj Rana, # 116, Uchha Parwanoo, Near Gurdwara, P.O. Parwanoo, Tehsil Kasauli, Distt. Solan, H.P. and (i) The Managing Director, M/s Paragreen (P) Ltd., SCO-7, 2nd Floor, Sector-11, Panchkula, Haryana. (ii) The Factory Manager, M/s Acery India Technologies Ltd., Parwati Bhawan, Khasra No. 380/2 & 381/1, Village Kamli, P.O. Parwanoo, Near Panpoj Hospital, Sector-1, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
8661 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939"Whether termination of services of Sh. Hem Raj Rana, # 116, Uchha Parwanoo, Near Gurdwara, P.O. Parwanoo, Tehsil Kasauli, Distt. Solan, H.P. w.e.f. 26.2.2016, who was employed as Security Guard in the establishment namely (i) M/s Acery India Technologies Ltd., Parwati Bhawan, Khasra No. 380/2 & 381/1, Village Kamli, P.O. Parwanoo, Near Panpoj Hospital, Sector-1, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer) through The Managing Director, M/s Paragreen (P) Ltd., SCO-7, 2nd Floor, Sector-11, Panchkula, Haryana, (Contractor) allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/86(Lab) ID/2017/Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between the General Secretary ( Sh. Jogi Ram) & President (Sh. Ram Pal), H.P. Industrial Workers Union, Tata Global Beverages Ltd. Dhaula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Tata Global Beverages Ltd. Village & P.O. Dhaula-Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.
As per report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether demand raised by General Secretary (Sh. Jogi Ram) & President ( Sh. Ram Pal), H.P. Industrial Workers Union, Tata Global Beverages Ltd. Dhaula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. vide demand notice dated 21-1-2016 ( Copy-Enclosed) before and to be fulfilled by The General Manager, M/s Tata Global Beverages Ltd. Village & P.O. Dhaula-Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. , regarding payment of bonus retrospectively to all workers as per the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 20158662 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 published in the Gazette of India on 01-1-2016 and effective from 01-4-2014, is legal and justified? If yes, what relief/monetary benefits the workmen of above establishment are entitled to ?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th March, 2017
No.: 11-6/85 (Lab)ID/2017/Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between President & General Secretary, Himachal Hotel Mazdoor Lal Jhanda Union (affiliated to CITU), 9 Bawa Building, The Mall Shimla-3. and Sh. Devinder Thakur, Employer, Hotel Anfield, Near Victory Tunnel, Shimla-3.
As per report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether demand no. 1, 5, 6, & 8 raised by the President & General Secretary, Himachal Hotel Mazdoor Lal Jhanda Union (affiliated to CITU), 9 Bawa Building, The Mall Shimla-3 vide demand-notice, dated-nil (Copy-Enclosed) for fulfilling before the Sh. Devinder Thakur, Employer, Hotel Anfield, Near Victory Tunnel, Shimla-3, are legal and justified? If yes, what monetary and other benefits the aggrieved workmen are entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
8663 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th March, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between President & Cashier, A.P. Goyal University, Driver–Conductor Union, Kawara, Tehsil & Distt. Shimla-9 with the Vice-Chancellor/ Registrar, A.P. Goyal Shimla University, Shoghi-Mehlii By Pass Road, Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Rajesh Kumar & 11 others ( List-Enclosed), who were working as Drivers & Conductors, w.e.f. 31-12-2016 by the Registrar, M/s A.P. Goyal Shimla University, Shoghi-Mehlii By Pass Road, Shimla, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- workers are entitled to from the above management/employer?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th March, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Tibant Kumar s/o Sh. Nokhu Ram, Village & 8664 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 P.O. Nanj, Tehsil Karsog, Distt. Mandi, H.P. and The Principal, Sacred Heart Convent School, Dhalli, Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Tibant Kumar s/o Sh. Nokhu Ram, Village & P.O. Nanj, Tehsil Karsog, Distt. Mandi, (H.P.), who was employed as Driver, by the Principal, Sacred Heart Convent School, Dhalli, Shimla, (H.P.) w.e.f. 28-8-2015, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/86(Lab) ID/2017/Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Vipin Kumar s/o Sh. Ramesh Chand r/o Village Bharapur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. with (i) The Manager, M/s Merico Ltd. Village Tokiyon, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H,P. (Principal Employer) (ii) The Manager, M/s D.S. Packer, Village Tokiyon, P.O. Dhoula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. (Contractor) as per demand notice dated 04-12-2015.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said8665 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Vipin Kumar s/o Sh. Ramesh Chand r/o Village Bharapur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. by the (i) The Manager, M/s Merico Ltd. Village Tokiyon, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H,P. (Principal Employer) (ii) The Manager, M/s D.S. Packer, Village Tokiyon, P.O. Dhoula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. (Contractor) during April, 2015, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management ?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th July, 2017
No.: 11-1/85(Lab)I.D./2017-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Arjun Singh s/o Shri Bhagat Ram, r/o Village Diara, P.O. Totarani, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. and the Director, M/s Raheja Hydro Power Project, Gaj-II SHP, Village Diara, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of termination from services w.e.f. 22-02-2016.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;
8666 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939"Whether the termination of the services of Shri Arjun Singh s/o Shri Bhagat Ram, r/o Village Diara, P.O. Totarani, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. by the Director, M/s Raheja Hydro Power Project, Gaj-II SHP, Village Diara, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 22-02-2016 vide order dated 15-02-2016 (copy enclosed) on the basis of domestic enquiry and without affording adequate/sufficient opportunities in the domestic enquiry, as alleged by the workman, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief of service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th July, 2017
No.: 11-1/7(Lab)I.D./2017-Joginder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Bhag Mal s/o Shri Hari Ram, r/o Village Kalhog, P.O. Boching, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Bhag Mal s/o Shri Hari Ram, r/o Village Kalhog, P.O. Boching, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. from time to time during April, 2009 to January, 2016 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
8667 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th July, 2017
No.: 11-1/7(Lab)I.D./2017-Joginder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Bhim Singh s/o Shri Lekh Ram, r/o Village Jhilan, P.O. Jhatingri, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: -
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Bhim Singh s/o Shri Lekh Ram, r/o Village Jhilan, P.O. Jhatingri, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. from time to time during July, 2007 to September, 2015 and finally terminated during October, 2015 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th July, 2017
No.: 11-1/7(Lab)I.D./2017-Joginder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Bimla Devi w/o Shri Balam Ram, r/o Village Fihad, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power 8668 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the termination of services of Smt. Bimla Devi w/o Shri Balam Ram, r/o Village Fihad, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. from time to time during July, 2000 to March, 2014 and finally terminated during April, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th July, 2017
No.: 11-1/18(Lab)I.D./2017-Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Gere Ram s/o Shri Datu Ram, r/o Village Khardi, P.O. Podakothi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Gere Ram s/o Shri Datu Ram, r/o Village Khardi, P.O. Podakothi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 31-10-2015 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by8669 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th July, 2017
No.: 11-1/7(Lab)I.D./2017-Joginder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Gian Chand s/o Shri Mehar Chand, r/o Village Kholi, P.O. Dul, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Gian Chand S/O Shri Mehar Chand, R/O Village Kholi, P.O. Dul, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. from time to time during June, 2011 to May, 2015 and finally terminated during June, 2015 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
8670 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 विधि विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 19 सितम्बर, 2017
संख्या एल0एल0आर0-ई(9)-2/2007-लेज.--श्रीमती विजयता चौहान, अधिवक्ता, किन्नौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल कल्पा, जिला किन्नौर की सीमाओं के भीतर, नोटरी के रूप में नियुक्ति के लिए नोटरी अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 53) और उसके अन्तर्गत नोटरी नियम, 1956 के अधीन आवेदन किया है और इस सम्बन्ध में अधिनियम और नियमों द्वारा अपेक्षित सभी औपचारिकताएं पूरी कर ली है।
अत; हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, उक्त नियमों के नियम 7क के उप-नियम (2) के अन्तर्गत गठित साक्षातकार बोर्ड की सिफारिश पर उक्त नियमों के नियम 8 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्रीमती विजयता चौहान, अधिवक्ता को उप-मण्ड़ल कल्पा, जिला किन्नौर की सीमाओं के भीतर तुरन्त प्रभाव से पब्लिक नोटरी नियुक्त करते हैं तथा यह भी निदेश देते हैं कि इनका नाम सरकार द्वारा इस निमित बनाए गए रजिस्टर में दर्ज कर लिया जाए।
आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 बलदेव सिंह, प्रधान सचिव (विधि)।
-------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. LLR-E(9)2/2017-Legn. Dated
19-09-2017 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of India].
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th September, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)-2/2017-Legn.—WHEREAS, Ms. Vijayta Chauhan, Advocate, Kinnaur has applied for appointment as Public Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, within the territorial limits of Sub-Division Kalpa of District Kinnaur;
AND WHEREAS, all the formalities required under the said Act and Rules have been completed;
NOW, therefore, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Interview Board, constituted under sub-rule(2) of rule 7A of the said rules, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the said Act, read with rule 8 of the said rules, is pleased to appoint Ms. Vijayta Chauhan, Advocate as Public Notary within the limits of Sub-Division Kalpa of District Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect with the direction that his name may be entered in the Register of Notaries maintained by the Government.
By order, DR. BALDEV SINGH, LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
8671 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 विधि विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 19 सितम्बर, 2017
संख्या एल0एल0आर0-ई(9)-12/2015-लेज.--श्री नीरज कुमार, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल नाहन, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर, नोटरी के रूप में नियुक्ति के लिए नोटरी अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 53) और उसके अन्तर्गत नोटरी नियम, 1956 के अधीन आवेदन किया है और इस सम्बन्ध में अधिनियम और नियमों द्वारा अपेक्षित सभी औपचारिकताएं पूरी कर ली है।
अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, उक्त नियमों के नियम 7क के उप-नियम (2) के अन्तर्गत गठित साक्षातकार बोर्ड की सिफारिश पर उक्त नियमों के नियम 8 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री नीरज कुमार, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर को उप-मण्ड़ल नाहन, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर तुरन्त प्रभाव से पब्लिक नोटरी नियुक्त करते हैं तथा यह भी निदेश देते हैं कि इनका नाम सरकार द्वारा इस निमित बनाए गए रजिस्टर में दर्ज कर लिया जाए।
आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 बलदेव सिंह, प्रधान सचिव (विधि)।
---------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. LLR-E(9)12/2015-Legn. Dated
19-09-2017 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of India].
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th September, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)-12/2015-Legn.—WHEREAS, Shri Neeraj Kumar, Advocate, Sirmour has applied for appointment as Public Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder within the territorial limits of Sub-Division Nahan of District Sirmour;
AND WHEREAS, all the formalities required under the said Act and Rules have been completed;
NOW, therefore, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Interview Board, constituted under sub-rule(2) of rule 7A of the said rules, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the said Act, read with rule 8 of the said rules, is pleased to appoint Shri Neeraj Kumar, Advocate as Public Notary within the limits of Sub-Division Nahan of District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect with the direction that his name may be entered in the Register of Notaries maintained by the Government.
By order, DR. BALDEV SINGH, LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
8672 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 विधि विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 19 सितम्बर, 2017
संख्या एल0एल0आर0-ई(9)-12/2015-लेज.--श्री ईश्वर सिंह विष्ट, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल नाहन, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर, नोटरी के रूप में नियुक्ति के लिए नोटरी अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 53) और उसके अन्तर्गत नोटरी नियम, 1956 के अधीन आवेदन किया है और इस सम्बन्ध में अधिनियम और नियमों द्वारा अपेक्षित सभी औपचारिकताएं पूरी कर ली है।
अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, उक्त नियमों के नियम 7क के उप-नियम (2) के अन्तर्गत गठित साक्षातकार बोर्ड की सिफारिश पर उक्त नियमों के नियम 8 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री ईश्वर सिंह विष्ट, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर को उप-मण्ड़ल नाहन, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर तुरन्त प्रभाव से पब्लिक नोटरी नियुक्त करते हैं तथा यह भी निदेश देते हैं कि इनका नाम सरकार द्वारा इस निमित बनाए गए रजिस्टर में दर्ज कर लिया जाए।
आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 बलदेव सिंह, प्रधान सचिव (विधि)।
---------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. LLR-E(9)12/2015-Legn. Dated 19-
09-2017 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of India].
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th September, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)-12/2015-Legn.—WHEREAS, Shri Ishwar Singh Bisht, Advocate, Sirmour has applied for appointment as Public Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder within the territorial limits of Sub-Division Nahan of District Sirmour;
AND WHEREAS, all the formalities required under the said Act and Rules have been completed;
NOW, therefore, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Interview Board, constituted under sub-rule(2) of rule 7A of the said rules, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the said Act, read with rule 8 of the said rules, is pleased to appoint Shri Ishwar Singh Bisht, Advocate as Public Notary within the limits of Sub-Division Nahan of District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect with the direction that his name may be entered in the Register of Notaries maintained by the Government.
By order, DR. BALDEV SINGH, LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
8673 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 विधि विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 19 सितम्बर, 2017
संख्या एल0एल0आर0-ई(9)-13/2015-लेज.--श्री आत्माराम शर्मा, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप- मण्ड़ल पांवटा साहिब, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर, नोटरी के रूप में नियुक्ति के लिए नोटरी अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 53) और उसके अन्तर्गत नोटरी नियम, 1956 के अधीन आवेदन किया है और इस सम्बन्ध में अधिनियम और नियमों द्वारा अपेक्षित सभी औपचारिकताएं पूरी कर ली है।
अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, उक्त नियमों के नियम 7क के उप-नियम (2) के अन्तर्गत गठित साक्षातकार बोर्ड की सिफारिश पर उक्त नियमों के नियम 8 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री आत्माराम शर्मा, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल पांवटा साहिब, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर तुरन्त प्रभाव से पब्लिक नोटरी नियुक्त करते हैं तथा यह भी निदेश देते हैं कि इनका नाम सरकार द्वारा इस निमित बनाए गए रजिस्टर में दर्ज कर लिया जाए।
आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 बलदेव सिंह, प्रधान सचिव (विधि)।
---------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. LLR-E(9)13/2015- Legn. Dated 19 -
09-2017 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of India].
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th September, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)-13/2015-Legn.—WHEREAS, Shri Atma Ram Sharma, Advocate, Sirmour has applied for appointment as Public Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder within the territorial limits of Sub-Division Paonta Sahib of District Sirmour;
AND WHEREAS, all the formalities required under the said Act and Rules have been completed;
NOW, therefore, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Interview Board, constituted under sub-rule(2) of rule 7A of the said rules, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the said Act, read with rule 8 of the said rules, is pleased to appoint Shri Atma Ram Sharma, Advocate as Public Notary within the limits of Sub-Division Paonta Sahib of District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect with the direction that his name may be entered in the Register of Notaries maintained by the Government.
By order, DR. BALDEV SINGH, LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
8674 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 विधि विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 19 सितम्बर, 2017
संख्या एल0एल0आर0-ई(9)-13/2015-लेज.--श्री अश्वनी कुमार शर्मा, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप- मण्ड़ल पांवटा साहिब, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर, नोटरी के रूप में नियुक्ति के लिए नोटरी अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 53) और उसके अन्तर्गत नोटरी नियम, 1956 के अधीन आवेदन किया है और इस सम्बन्ध में अधिनियम और नियमों द्वारा अपेक्षित सभी औपचारिकताएं पूरी कर ली है।
अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, उक्त नियमों के नियम 7क के उप-नियम (2) के अन्तर्गत गठित साक्षातकार बोर्ड की सिफारिश पर उक्त नियमों के नियम 8 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री अश्वनी कुमार शर्मा, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल पांवटा साहिब, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर तुरन्त प्रभाव से पब्लिक नोटरी नियुक्त करते हैं तथा यह भी निदेश देते हैं कि इनका नाम सरकार द्वारा इस निमित बनाए गए रजिस्टर में दर्ज कर लिया जाए।
आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 बलदेव सिंह, प्रधान सचिव (विधि)।
---------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. LLR-E(9)13/2015-Legn. Dated 19-
09-2017 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of India].
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th September, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)- 13 /2015-Legn.—WHEREAS, Shri Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Sirmour has applied for appointment as Public Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder within the territorial limits of Sub-Division Paonta Sahib of District Sirmour;
AND WHEREAS, all the formalities required under the said Act and Rules have been completed;
NOW, therefore, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Interview Board, constituted under sub-rule(2) of rule 7A of the said rules, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the said Act, read with rule 8 of the said rules, is pleased to appoint Shri Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Advocate as Public Notary within the limits of Sub-Division Paonta Sahib of District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect with the direction that his name may be entered in the Register of Notaries maintained by the Government.
By order, DR. BALDEV SINGH, LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
8675 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 विधि विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 19 सितम्बर, 2017
संख्या एल0एल0आर0-ई(9)-45/2005-लेज.--श्री अजय शर्मा, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल राजगढ़, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर, नोटरी के रूप में नियुक्ति के लिए नोटरी अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 53) और उसके अन्तर्गत नोटरी नियम, 1956 के अधीन आवेदन किया है और इस सम्बन्ध में अधिनियम और नियमों द्वारा अपेक्षित सभी औपचारिकताएं पूरी कर ली है ।
अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, उक्त नियमों के नियम 7क के उप-नियम (2) के अन्तर्गत गठित साक्षातकार बोर्ड की सिफारिश पर उक्त नियमों के नियम 8 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 द्वारा पदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री अजय शर्मा, अधिवक्ता, सिरमौर ने उप-मण्ड़ल राजगढ़, जिला सिरमौर की सीमाओं के भीतर तुरन्त प्रभाव से पब्लिक नोटरी नियुक्त करते हैं तथा यह भी निदेश देते हैं कि इनका नाम सरकार द्वारा इस निमित बनाए गए रजिस्टर में दर्ज कर लिया जाए।
आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 बलदेव सिंह, प्रधान सचिव (विधि)।
---------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. LLR-E(9)45/ 2005-Legn. Dated 19-
09-2017 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of India].
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th September, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)- 45 /2005-Legn.—WHEREAS, Shri Ajay Sharma, Advocate, Sirmour has applied for appointment as Public Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, within the territorial limits of Sub-Division Rajgarh of District Sirmour;
AND WHEREAS, all the formalities required under the said Act and Rules have been completed;
NOW, therefore, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Interview Board, constituted under sub-rule(2) of rule 7A of the said rules, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the said Act, read with rule 8 of the said rules, is pleased to appoint Shri Ajay Sharma, Advocate as Public Notary within the limits of Sub-Division Rajgarh of District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect with the direction that his name may be entered in the Register of Notaries maintained by the Government.
By order, DR. BALDEV SINGH, LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
8676 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 [Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No.EXN-F(10)-34/2017 dated 08/12/2017 as required under clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India].
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION No. 34/2017-STATE TAX
Shimla-2, the 8th December, 2017
No.EXN-F(10)-34/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(10 of 2017), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, namely :—
(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (Fourteenth Amendment)Rules, 2017.
(2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), in rule 3 –
(i) after sub-rule (3), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:—
"(3A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rules (1), (2) and (3), a person who has been granted registration on a provisional basis under rule 24 or who has applied for registration under sub-rule (1) of rule 8 may opt to pay tax under section 10 with effect from the first day of October, 2017 by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02, on the common portal either directly or through a Facilitation Centre notified by the Commissioner, before the said date and shall furnish the statement in FORM GST ITC-03 in accordance with the provisions of sub- rule (4) of rule 44 within a period of ninety days from the said date:
Provided that the said persons shall not be allowed to furnish the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 after the statement in FORM GST ITC-03 has been furnished.";
(ii) in sub-rule (5), after the words, brackets and figure "or sub-rule (3)", the words, brackets, figure and letter "or sub-rule (3A)" shall be inserted;
3. In the principal rules, after rule 120, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:—
"120A. Every registered person who has submitted a declaration electronically in FORM GST TRAN-1 within the time period specified in rule 117, rule 118, rule 119 and rule 120 may revise such declaration once and submit the revised declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 electronically on the common portal within the time period specified in the said rules or such further period as may be extended by the Commissioner in this behalf.";
4. In the principal rules, in rule 122, in clause (b), after the words "Commissioners of State tax or central tax", the words "for at least one year" shall be inserted;
5. In the principal rules, in rule 124,—
(i) for sub-rule (3), the following sub-rule shall be substituted, namely:—
8677 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939"(3) The Technical Member shall be paid a monthly salary and other allowances and benefits as are admissible to him when holding an equivalent Group 'A' post in the Government of India:
Provided that where a retired officer is selected as a Technical Member, he shall be paid a monthly salary equal to his last drawn salary reduced by the amount of pension in accordance with the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission, as accepted by the Central Government.";
(ii) in sub-rule (4), after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:—
"Provided further that upon the recommendations of the Council and subject to an opportunity of being heard, the Central Government may terminate the appointment of the Chairman at any time.";
(iii) in sub-rule (5), after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
"Provided further that upon the recommendations of the Council and subject to an opportunity of being heard, the Central Government may terminate the appointment of a Technical Member at any time.";
6. In the principal rules, in rule 127, after clause (iii), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:—
"(iv) to furnish a performance report to the Council by the tenth of the close of each quarter.";
7. In the principal rules, in rule 138, in sub-rule (1), the following provisos shall be inserted, namely:—
"Provided that where goods are sent by a principal located in one State to a jobworker located in any other State, the e-way bill shall be generated by the principal irrespective of the value of the consignment:
Provided further that where handicraft goods are transported from one State to another by a person who has been exempted from the requirement of obtaining registration under clauses (i) and (ii) of section 24, the e-way bill shall be generated by the said person irrespective of the value of the consignment.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this rule, the expression "handicraft goods" has the meaning as assigned to it in this Department Notification No.32/2017- STATE TAX dated 9.10.2017 published in the Rajpatra, Hiamchal Pradesh vide number EXN-F(10)-34/2017 on 23rd October, 2017 .";
8. In the principal rules, with effect from the 1st day of July, 2017, in "FORM GST TRAN- 1",
(i) in Serial No. 5(a), in the heading, after the words, figures and brackets "Section 140(1)", the words, figures, brackets and letter ", Section 140 (4) (a) and Section 140(9)" shall be inserted;
8678 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 (ii) in Serial No. 7(a), in the table, in Serial No. 7A, in the heading, after the word "invoices", the words, brackets and letters "[including Credit Transfer Document (CTD)]" shall be inserted;
(iii) after the words "Designation/Status", the following shall be inserted, namely:—
"Instructions:
1. Central Tax credit in terms of sub-section (9) of section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 shall be availed in column 6 of table 5 (a).
2. Registered persons availing credit through Credit Transfer Document (CTD) shall also file TRANS 3 besides availing credit in table 7A under the heading "inputs.";
9. In the principal rules, with effect from the 1st day of July, 2017, in "FORM GSTR-4", in Serial No.8, in entry 8B(2), for the words "Intra-State Supplies", the words "Inter-State Supplies" shall be substituted;
10. In the principal rules, with effect from the 12th day of October, 2017, in the Notes to "FORM GST EWB-01", after Note 4, the following Note shall be inserted, namely:—
"5. The details of bill of entry shall be entered in place of invoice where the consignment pertains to an import."
By order, Sd/- Additional Chief Secretary (E&T).
____________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Balh,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1. Sh. Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Munshi Ram, r/o Village Ghatta, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
2. Smt. Kanika d/o Shri Miter Dev, r/o Village Reur, P.O. Reur, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Sh. Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Munshi Ram, r/o Village Ghatta, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Sh. Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Munshi Ram, r/o Village Ghatta, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. and Smt. Kanika d/o Shri Miter Dev, r/o Village Reur, P.O. Reur, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Sh. Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Munshi Ram, Village Ghatta, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 16-02-2015 according to Hindu rites and customs at Village Ghatta, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
8679 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 15-12-2017. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.
Issued today on 14th November, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Balh, District Mandi (H.P.).
----------------
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Balh,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1. Sh. Jagdish s/o Shri Todar Ram, r/o Village Chowki Chandrahan, P.O. Reur, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
2. Smt. Lalita Devi d/o Shri Leela Dhar, r/o Village Doh, P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Sh. Jagdish s/o Shri Todar Ram, r/o Village Chowki Chandrahan, P.O. Reur, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Sh. Jagdish s/o Shri Todar Ram, r/o Village Chowki Chandrahan, P.O. Reur, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. and Smt. Lalita Devi d/o Shri Leela Dhar, r/o Village Doh, P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Sh. Jagdish s/o Shri Todar Ram, r/o Village Chowki Chandrahan, P.O. Reur, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 09-07-2010 according to Hindu rites and customs at Village Doh, P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 15-12-2017. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.
Issued today on 14th November, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Balh, District Mandi (H.P.).
8680 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1. Sh. Somu s/o Shri Brij Lal, r/o Village Khandla, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
2. Smt. Chetna Kumari d/o Shri Duni Ram, r/o Village Daan, P.O. Baggi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Sh. Somu s/o Shri Brij Lal, r/o Village Khandla, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Sh. Somu s/o Shri Brij Lal, r/o Village Khandla, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P and Smt. Chetna Kumari d/o Shri Duni Ram, r/o Village Daan, P.O. Baggi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Sh. Somu s/o Shri Brij Lal, r/o Village Khandla, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 22-04-2016 according to Hindu rites and customs at Village Khandla, P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 15-12-2017. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.
Issued today on 14th November, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Balh, District Mandi (H.P.).
___________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1. Sh. Prashant Raosaheb Sinde s/o Sh. Raosaheb Shripati Shinde s/o Shripati Aau Shinde, r/o A-102, Audumber Housing Complex Benderkar Ali Chiplun, District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, Pin-415605.
2. Smt. Geetika d/o Ashok Kumar, r/o Village Nela, P.O. Dudar, Tehsil Sadar, District . . Applicants.
Mandi, H. P. -175001.
8681 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 VersusGeneral Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Sh. Prashant Raosaheb Sinde s/o Sh. Raosaheb Shripati Shinde s/o Shripati Aau Shinde, r/o A-102, Audumber Housing Complex Benderkar Ali Chiplun, Tal Chiplun, District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, Pin-415605 and Geetika d/o Ashok Kumar, r/o Village Nela, P.O. Dudar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H. P.-175001 (at present wife of Sh. Prashant Saosaheb Sinde s/o Sh. Raosaheb Shripati Shinde s/o Shripati Aau Shinde, r/o A-102, Audumber Housing Complex Benderkar Ali Chiplun, Tal Chiplun, District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, Pin-415605. have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 18-08-2017 according to Hindu rites and customs at Village Nela, P.O. Dudar, Tehsil Sadar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 22-12-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.
Issued today on 21th day of November, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).
_________
न्यायालय सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग सुन्नी, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)
वाद संख्या : 3/XIII-B-I/2017
तारीख मरजुआ : 20-11-2017 श्री तेज राज बनाम आम जनता दरख्वास्त बराये दरुस्तीे नाम।
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।
हरगाह खास व आम को बजरिया नोटिस सूचित किया जाता है कि श्री तेज राज पुत्र श्री टेक चन्द, निवासी महाल सुन्नी, परगना बडाबल, तहसील सुन्नी, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ने इस न्यायालय में प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत कर अभिव्यक्त किया है कि प्रार्थी का नाम राजस्व रिकार्ड में श्री तेज राम पुत्र श्री टेक चन्द दर्ज है जो कि गलत है परन्तु पंचायत रिकार्ड व अन्य प्रमाण-पत्र में नाम तेज राज पुत्र टेक चन्द दर्ज है जो कि सही व सत्य है। उन्होंने उसेे ठीक करने के लिए प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है। 8682 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 अतः इस प्रार्थना-पत्र बारे आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को नाम दरुस्त करने में आपाि हो तो वह अपनी आपाि लिखित रूप में दिनांक 22-12-2017 अथवा इससे पूर्व इस न्यायालय को प्रस्तुत करें। तदोपरान्त कोई आपाि मान्य नहीं होगी।
हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से आज दिनांक 20-11-2017 को जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, सुन्नी, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
--------
न्यायालय सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग सुन्नी, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)
तारीख मरजुआ : 20-11-2017 वाद संख्या : 4/XIII-B-I/2017
श्री राजेश कुमार बनाम आम जनता दरख्वास्त बराये दरुस्ती नाम।
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।
हरगाह खास व आम को बजरिया नोटिस सूचित किया जाता है कि श्री राजेश कुमार पुत्र नोखू, निवासी महाल गैंडा, परगना चौथा, तहसील सुन्नी, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ने इस न्यायालय में प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत कर अभिव्यक्त किया है कि प्रार्थी का नाम राजस्व रिकार्ड में राजु राम पुत्र नोखू दर्ज है जो कि गलत है परन्तु पंचायत रिकार्ड व अन्य प्रमाण-पत्र में नाम राजेश कुमार पुत्र नोखू दर्ज है जो कि सही व सत्य है। उन्होंने उसेे ठीक करने के लिए प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है।
अतः इस प्रार्थना-पत्र बारे आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को नाम दरुस्त करने में आपाि हो तो वह अपनी आपाि लिखित रूप में दिनांक 22-12-2017 अथवा इससे पूर्व इस न्यायालय को प्रस्तुत करें। तदोपरान्त कोई आपाि मान्य नहीं होगी।
हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से आज दिनांक 20-11-2017 को जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, सुन्नी, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
--------
ब अदालत श्री प्रदीप कुमार जस्सल, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कोटगढ़, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)
मुकद्दमा नम्बर : 12/2017 तारीख दायर : 09-10-2017 तारीख पेशी : 29-12-2017 श्री सामु राम उर्फ साम दास पुत्र स्व0 श्री घुनु, निवासी ग्राम भुट्टी, डा0 भुट्टी, उप-तहसील कोटगढ़, . . वादी। जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रतिवादी8683 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 दरख्वास्त.--दरूस्ती नाम राजस्व अभिलेख के मोहाल भुट्टी, पटवार वृत्त भुट्टी, उप-तहसील कोटगढ़, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0।
श्री सामु राम उर्फ साम दास पुत्र स्व0 श्री घुनुु, निवासी ग्राम भुट्टी, डा0 भुट्टी, उप-तहसील कोटगढ़, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 ने इस अदालत में एक प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत करके निवेदन किया है कि उसका व उसके पिता का नाम मोहाल भुट्टी, पटवार वृा भुट्टी, उप-तहसील कोटगढ़ के राजस्व अभिलेख में सामु पुत्र धनु दर्ज कागजात माल है जो गलत दर्ज है। आवेदक व उसके पिता का सही नाम साम दास पुत्र घुनु है जिसकी पुष्टि में उसने ग्राम पंचायत भुट्टी द्वारा जारी परिवार रजिस्टर की प्रतिलिपि व आधार कार्ड नम्बर 6724 8029 3728 की प्रतिलिपि प्रस्तुत की है।
अतः इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि साम दास पुत्र घुनु जिसका नाम राजस्व अभिलेख में सामु पुत्र धनु दर्ज के स्थान पर सामु राम उर्फ साम दास पुत्र घुनु दरूस्त दर्ज करने बारे किसी व्यक्ति को किसी भी प्रकार का उजर या एतराज हो तो वह इस अदालत में इस इश्तहार के प्रकाशन के बाद 29-12-2017 तक असालतन या वकालतन अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है। इसके पश्चात् कोई भी उजर या एतराज काबले समायत नहीं होगा तथा उपरोक्त व्यक्ति के नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश अदालत से जारी कर दिये जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 22-11-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी हुये।
मोहर।
प्रदीप कुमार जस्सल, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कोटगढ़, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
--------
In the Court of Shri Ajit Bhardwaj, H.P.A.S., Sub Divisional Magisrate Shimla (Urban)
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
District Mandi, H. P.
Sh. Mahant Ram s/o Shri Puran Chand, r/o Village Tarmoh, P.O. Dargi, Tehsil Balh, . . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
. . Respondent.
Application under Section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Sh. Mahant Ram s/o Shri Puran Chand , r/o Village Tarmoh, P.O. Dargi, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration of date of death of his wife namely Sarla Devi (DOD 14-11-2014) at above address in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for entry as to date of death mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in this court on or before 03-01-2018 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 04th day of December, 2017.
Seal.
AJIT BHARDWAJ (HPAS), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Urban) District Shimla,H.P.
8684 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 08 दिसम्बर, 2017/17 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, ऊना, तहसील व जिला ऊना (हि0 प्र0)
रणजीत सिंह बनाम आम जनता दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु रजिस्ट्रीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.
नोटिस बनाम जनता आम।
श्री रणजीत सिंह पुत्र सुरख राम, निवासी राजपुरा, डा0 तलमीरा, तहसील बंगाणा, जिला ऊना ने इस अदालत में दरख्वास्त दी है कि उसकी गोद ली हई पुत्री का जन्म गांव R. H. Una में दिनांक 03-10-2013 को हुआ था, परन्तु इस बारे पंचायत के रिकॉर्ड में पंजीकरण नहीं करवाया जा सका। अब पंजीकरण करने के आदेश दिए जाएं।
अतः इस नोटिस के माध्यम से सर्वसाधारण को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त जन्म के पंजीकरण होने बारे कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 18-12-2017 को प्रातः दस बजे अधोहस्ताक्षरी के समक्ष असालतन/वकालतन हाजिर आकर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा उपरोक्त जन्म का पंजीकरण करने के आदेश दे दिए जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 20-11-2017 को हस्ताक्षर मेरे व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ।
मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/-
तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी,
ऊना, जिला ऊना (हि0 प्र0)। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है