राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शुक्रवार, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31 August, 2017
No.: 11-1/18(Lab)I.D./2017-Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Thakur Dass S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Saran, P.O. 235-राजपत्र/2017-16-02-2018 (10561) 10562 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Chowki, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and The Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Thakur Dass S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Saran, P.O. Chowki, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. from time to time during year, 1994 and finally terminated during June, 2016 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Anil Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Anil Kumar S/O Late Sh. Nar Bhadur R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
10563 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Anil Kumar S/O Sh. Late Sh. Nar Bhadur R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Arjun.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Arjun Singh S/O Sh. Ramesh Chand, R/O Village Kuppa, P.O. Kamroo, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute. Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Arjun Singh S/O Sh. Ramesh Chand, R/O Village Kuppa, P.O. Kamroo, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s10564 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 02nd August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Asha Devi.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Solan Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Ms. Asha Devi D/O Sh. Bal Bahadur, VPO Gaura, Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
1. "Whether termination of services of Ms. Asha Devi D/O Sh. Bal Bahadur, VPO Gaura, Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P. by The Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 16-11-2016 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?"10565 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 2. "Whether action of the management of M/s LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli- Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) to engage the services of a fresh/ junior workman without paying legal dues to the senior workman i.e. Ms. Asha Devi D/O Sh. Bal Bahadur, VPO Gaura, Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P., without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief and other service benefits the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from said employer/institute?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Babli.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Solan Zone, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Babli S/O Sh. Mast Ram, Village Kothi, P.O. Hanuman Barog, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan, H.P. and The Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Babli S/O Sh. Mast Ram, Village Kothi, P.O. Hanuman Barog, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 15-7-2015 through oral orders, without complying with the provisions of the10566 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, reinstatement, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 05th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Balbir.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Balbir Singh S/O Sh. Jaswant Singh, Village- Beer Plassi, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Balbir Singh S/O Sh. Jaswant Singh, Village- Beer Plassi, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 26-6-2016 by the Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
10567 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 02nd August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Balwant.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Solan Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Balwant Singh S/O Sh. Mehar Singh, Village- Bajrol ( Kailar), P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
1. "Whether termination of services of Sh. Balwant Singh S/O Sh. Mehar Singh, Village- Bajrol ( Kailar), P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. by The Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 16.11.2016 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?"
2. "Whether action of the management of M/s LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli- Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) to engage the services of a fresh/junior workman without paying legal dues to the senior workman i.e. Sh. Balwant Singh S/O Sh. Mehar Singh, Village- Bajrol ( Kailar), P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P., without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief and other service benefits the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from said employer/institute?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
10568 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Chander Prakash.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Chander Prakash S/O Sh. Sonam Negi, R/O Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Chander Prakash S/O Sh. Sonam Negi, R/O Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th July, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Dinesh.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Dinesh Kumar S/O Sh. Sher Singh,10569 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Village- Khobla, P.O. Nand, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Dinesh Kumar S/O Sh. Sher Singh, Village- Khobla, P.O. Nand, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 03-6-2016 by the Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ganeshi Lal.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ganeshi Lal S/O Sh. Sewa Sukh R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the 10570 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Ganeshi Lal S/O Sh. Sewa Sukh, R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 05th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Jagdev.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jagdev Singh S/O Sh. Rulda Ram, Village-Ratyor, P.O. Darhota, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-10571 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Jagdev Singh S/O Sh. Rulda Ram, Village- Ratyor, P.O. Darhota, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 30-5-2016 by the Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jai Pal S/O Sh. Sonam Ram, Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Jai Pal S/O Sh. Sonam Ram, Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the10572 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Kewal Krishan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Kewal Krishan S/O Sh. Lal Chand R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Kewal Krishan S/O Sh. Lal Chand R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
10573 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Krishan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Krishan Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Chand R/O Village & P.O. Chansu, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Krishan Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Chand R/O Village & P.O. Chansu, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Madan.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum Conciliation Officer, Solan Zone, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial 10574 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Madan Lal S/O Sh. Raj Kumar, Village Kumahra, P.O. Kaba Kalan, Tehsil Kasauli, Distt. Solan, H.P. and The Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:— "Whether termination of the services of Sh. Madan Lal S/O Sh. Raj Kumar, Village Kumahra, P.O. Kaba Kalan, Tehsil Kasauli, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 12-2-2015 through oral orders, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, reinstatement, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Mani Ram.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Mani Ram S/O Sh. Ralu Ram, R/O Village- Anas, P.O. Nither, Tehsil Nirmand, Distt. Kullu, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal10575 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrialm Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Mani Ram S/O Sh. Ralu Ram, R/O Village- Anas, P.O. Nither, Tehsil Nirmand, Distt. Kullu, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 21-9-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Meenakshi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum Conciliation Officer, Solan Zone, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Ms. Meenakshi Devi D/O Sh. Kamal Jeet, VPO Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. and The Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O.m Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
10576 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of the services of Ms. Meenakshi Devi D/O Sh. Kamal Jeet, VPO Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. by the Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 11-7-2015 through oral orders, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, reinstatement, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Panna.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Panna Lal S/O Sh. Ram Dass, R/O Village-Kalangi, P.O. Degerh, Tehsil Anni, Distt. Kullu, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
10577 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Panna Lal S/O Sh. Ram Dass, R/O Village- Kalangi, P.O. Degerh, Tehsil Anni, Distt. Kullu, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 21-9-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Pawan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Bhagti, R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Bhagti, R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the10578 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 09th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/LR Institute.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum Conciliation Officer, Solan, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between The President/ General Secretary, L.R. Institute Workers Union, Jabli-Kyar, Oachghat, Solan, H.P. Vs The Registrar, L.R. Group of Institutes, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer Solan Circle, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of the services of office bearers S/Sh. Rattan Lal Gautam (President), Rajesh Kumar (General Secretary), Rajender Verma (Joint Secretary) of the L.R. Institute Workers Union, Jabli-Kyar, Oachghat, Solan, (H.P.) by the management of M/s L.R. Group of Institutes, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. during the pendency of conciliation proceedings, in violation of section -33 and without following the other provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- workers are entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
10579 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Raj Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Jai Nand R/O Village & P.O. Sangla, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Jai Nand R/O Village & P.O. Sangla, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 30-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 05th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Rakesh.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rakesh Kumar S/O Sh. Lekh Ram, 10580 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 R/O Village-Dhalmu, P.O. Ramsahar, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Rakesh Kumar S/O Sh. Lekh Ram, R/O Village- Dhalmu, P.O. Ramsahar, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 01-6-2016 by the Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ram Lal.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ram Lal S/O Sh. Shanti Lal Negi, R/O Village & P.O. Chaura, Tehsil Nichar, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the10581 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Ram Lal S/O Sh. Shanti Lal Negi, R/O Village & P.O. Chaura, Tehsil Nichar, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ranjeet.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ranjeet Kumar S/O Late Sh. Chaudhary Ram, R/O Village & P.O. Sathwin, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- 10582 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Ranjeet Kumar S/O Late Sh. Chaudhary Ram, R/O Village & P.O. Sathwin, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 21-9-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ravinder.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Jar Bhag (Card No. 179, Log Keeper), R/O Village Tangling, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Jar Bhag (Card No. 179, Log Keeper), R/O Village Tangling, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly10583 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ravinder.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Lok Nath (Card No. 068, LTV Driver) Village- Powari, P.O. & Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Lok Nath (Card No. 068, LTV Driver) Village- Powari, P.O. & Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
10584 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 1th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Sameer.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Sameer Chand S/O Sh. Deva Singh, R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Sameer Chand S/O Sh. Deva Singh, R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Shakti Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Shakti Kumar S/O Sh. Bhagwan10585 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Singh, R/O Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
"Whether termination of services of Sh. Shakti Kumar S/O Sh. Bhagwan Singh, R/O Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2017/Kangra/Bansi Lal.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Bansi Lal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O V.P.O. Chahri, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. and (13) other workmen (list enclosed) and (i) the Director of Horticulture, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2 (ii) the Deputy Director of Horticulture, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. (iii) the Fruit Technologist, H.P. Fruit Canning Unit, Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of miscellaneous demands.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power 10586 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the demands raised by Shri Bansi Lal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O V.P.O. Chahri, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. and (13) other workmen (list enclosed) vide demand notice dated 21-09-2015 (copy enclosed) before (i) the Director of Horticulture, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2 (ii) the Deputy Director of Horticulture, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. (iii) the Fruit Technologist, H.P. Fruit Canning Unit, Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. is tenable, legal and justified? If yes, what relief of service benefits the aggrieved workmen are entitled to as per demand notice? If not, what are its legal effects?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2012/Kangra/ Dhian Chand.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Dhian Chand S/O Shri Dharam Chand, R/O Village Kuthar Thati, P.O. Sansai, Tehsil and District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Deputy Commissioner-cum- Chairman, District Red Cross Society Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Secretary, Red Cross Society, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of changing his service conditions.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under subm section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the services rendered by Shri Dhian Chand S/O Shri Dharam Chand, R/O Village Kuthar Thati, P.O. Sansai, Tehsil and District Kangra, H.P. as Lab Technician w.e.f. 04-01- 2003 to November, 2003 and subsequently changing his service conditions i.e. designation from Lab Technician to Assistant Lab Technician w.e.f. December, 2003, without following10587 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what extent relief, service benefits and compensation the workman is entitled to from the above employers i.e. (i) the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Red Cross Society Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Secretary, Red Cross Society, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P.?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 08th August, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una/ Parvinder Singh.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Parvinder Singh & 8 other housekeeping workers C/O Datta Property Dealer, Near HRTC Workshop, District Una, H.P. and (i) the Employer M/S Nestle India, Industrial Area Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. (Principal Employer) (ii) the Employer, M/S Impressions Services Private Limited, Regd. Office WZ-8/7 (F.F.), Kirti Nagar, Industrial Area, New Delhi (Contractor) on the issue of demand regarding annual increment vide demand notice dated 21-03-2016.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the demandno. 1 & 2 regarding annual increment raised vide demand notice dated 21-03-2016 (copy enclosed) by Shri Parvinder Singh & 8 other housekeeping workers C/O Datta Property Dealer, Near HRTC Workshop, District Una, H.P. to be fulfilled by (i) the Employer M/S Nestle India, Industrial Area Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. (Principal Employer) (ii) the Employer, M/S Impressions Services Private Limited, Regd. Office WZ- 8/7 (F.F.), Kirti Nagar, Industrial Area, New Delhi (Contractor) are legal, justified and maintainable? If yes, what relief and benefits the above workers are entitled to by the above employers?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.
10588 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st August, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una/Surinder Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Om Prakash, R/O Village Bangarh, P.O. Jakhera, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the Manager, M/S Rangar Breweries Limited, Industrial Area Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during 21-03-2016.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether termination of the services of Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Om Prakash, R/O Village Bangarh, P.O. Jakhera, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. by the Manager, M/S Rangar Breweries Limited, Industrial Area Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. during 21-03- 2016 on the basis of domestic enquiry and without affording adequate/sufficient opportunities in the domestic enquiry, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 22nd September, 2017
No-Shram (E) 7-01/2017-Misc.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 33B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 the Governor Himachal Pradesh is pleased to transfer of the proceedings in reference no. 08/2017 titled as Jagdish Kumar V/S Sunil Malik, Director Kufri Fun World from Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Shimla to Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court D/Shala under section 33-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
By order, Sd/- Pr. Secretary (Lab. & Emp.).
10589 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th September, 2017
Whears, Shri Prem Dass Kaundal S/o Shri Kirpa Ram R/o VPO Serathana, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh had filed a claim application dated 02-01-2017 against the management of M/s Diviya Himachal Prakashan Pvt. Ltd., Kangra-Pathankot Road, Old Matour, Tehsil & District Kangra under Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Peovisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955). he claimed that he worked with the management from 26-03-2012 to 23-11-2015 as security guard Claimant demanded dues of Rs. 10,61,982/- under the Majithia Wage Board from the management above named Claimant filed this application u/s 17(1) of the ibid Act for recovery of the above said amount as arrear of land revenue.
And whereas, after issuance of notice, management field its reply and affidavit, thereby denied all the allegations made by the claimant/applicant. Management denied paying any kind of dues to the claimant. It also denied the employer-employee relationship between the management and claimant. It hence, challenged the claim filed under the ibid Act being not maintainable.
And whereas, claim and counter claims of both the parties were scrutinized at length by this 'authority' and came to the conclusion that amount in question is not a settled claim and recovery proceedings cannot be intiated as per the provisions of section 17(1) of the Act. Thus, question of payment of above said amount is required to be adjudicated by Labour Court as per the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Act.
Therefore, in view of the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (a) 4-17/11- L, Dated 18-10-2016 and as per power vested under Sub Section-2 of Section-17 of the Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955), the question as to above said amount due to the claimant under this Act is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (14 of 1947) with the following terms of reference for adjudication :—
1. "Whether employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant/claimant and management ever?" if yes.
2. "Whether applicant/claimant is entitled to the amount of Rs. 10,61,982/- as claimed by him from the management/respondent the Majithia Wage Board?"
By order, Sd/- Labour Officer, Kangra Zone at Dharamshala, H.P.
10590 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th September, 2017
Whears, Shri Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Pritam Chand R/o Village Barai, PO Suned, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh had filed a claim application dated 16-01-2017 against the management of M/s Amar Ujala Publications Ltd., Plot No. 22-23 Industrial Area Nagorota Bagwan, Tehsil Nagorota Bagwan, District Kangra under Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Peovisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955). He claimed that he was appointed as electrician with the management on 209-11-2012 Claimant demanded dues of Rs. 17,02,779/- under the Majithia Wage Board from the management above named Claimant filed this application u/s 17(1) of the ibid Act for recovery of the above said amount as arrear of land revenue.
And whereas, after issuance of notice, Management denied all the allegations, averments and assertions made by the claimant. Management challenged the locus standi to file the present claim by the claimant u/s 17(1) of the Act on the ground that no employer-employee relationship ever exsted between the management and claimant at any point of time. Management stated that he was the employee of their contractor Management also agitated the present claim being the abus of process of law Management thus, stated that it is not liable to pay any dues to the claimant under the Majithia Wage Board.
And wheras, claims and counter claims of both the parties were scrutinzed at length by this authority and came to the conclusion that amount in question is not a settled claim and recovery proceedings cannot be initiated as per the procisions of 17(1) of the Act of the Act. Thus, question of payment of above said amount is required to be adjudicated by Labour Court as per the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Act.
Therefore, in view of the above, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (a) 4-17/11- L, Dated 18-10-2016 and as per power vested under Sub Section-2 of Section-17 of the Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955), the question as to above said amount due to the claimant under this Act is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (14 of 1947) with the following terms of reference for adjudication :—
1. "Whether employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant/claimant and management ever?" if yes.
2. "Whether applicant/claimant is entitled to the amount of Rs. 17,02,779/- as claimed by him from the management/respondent the Majithia Wage Board?"
By order, Sd/- Labour Officer, Kangra Zone at Dharamshala, H.P.
10591 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th September, 2017
Whears, Shri Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Amar Nath R/o VPO Jalot, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh had filed a claim application dated 16-01-2017 against the management of M/s Amar Ujala Publications Ltd., Plot No. 22-23 Industrial Area Nagorota Bagwan, Tehsil Nagorota Bagwan, District Kangra under Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Peovisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955). He claimed that he was appointed as electrician with the management on 09-11-2012 Claimant demanded dues of Rs. 17,02,779/- under the Majithia Wage Board from the management above named Claimant filed this application u/s 17(1) of the ibid Act for recovery of the above said amount as arrear of land revenue.
And whereas, after issuance of notice, management field its reply. Management denied all the allegations, averments and assertions made by the claimant. Management challenged the locus standi to file the present claim by the claimant u/s 17(1) of the Act on the ground that no employer- employee relationship ever exsted between the management and claimant at any point of time. Management stated that he was the employee of their contractor Management also agitated the present claim being the abus of process of law Management thus, stated that it is not liable to pay any dues to the claimant under the Majithia Wage Board.
And wheras, claims and counter claims of both the parties were scrutinzed at length by this authority and came to the conclusion that amount in question is not a settled claim and recovery proceedings cannot be initiated as per the procisions of 17(1) of the Act of the Act. Thus, question of payment of above said amount is required to be adjudicated by Labour Court as per the provisions of Section 17(2) of the Act.
Therefore, in view of the above, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (a) 4-17/11- L, Dated 18-10-2016 and as per power vested under Sub Section-2 of Section-17 of the Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955), the question as to above said amount due to the claimant under this Act is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (14 of 1947) with the following terms of reference for adjudication :—
1. "Whether employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant/claimant and management ever?" if yes.
2. "Whether applicant/claimant is entitled to the amount of Rs. 17,02,779/- as claimed by him from the management/respondent the Majithia Wage Board?"
By order, Sd/- Labour Officer, Kangra Zone at Dharamshala, H.P.
10592 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 [Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. EXN-F(10)-6/2018 dated 12/02/2018 required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India.]
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
CORRIGENDUM
Shimla-2, the 12th February, 2018
No.EXN-F(10)-6/2018.—In the Notification No. 6/2018-State Tax (Rate) dated 24th Jan., 2018 published in the Gazette of Himachal Pradesh, Ordinary, vide No. EXN-F(10)-6/2018, dated 24th January, 2018,.—
(i) at page 10132, in serial No.(B) (i), for the word "substituted" read "inserted" (ii) at page 10132, in serial No. (B) (ii), for word "substituted" read "inserted"
By order, JAGDISH CHANDER SHARMA, Principal Secretary (E&T).
_____________
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 15th February, 2018
No.Fin-2-C-(12)-3/2017.—Government of Himachal Pradesh hereby notifies the sale of Himachal Pradesh Government Stock (securities) of 10-year tenure for an aggregate amount of ` 500.00 crore (Nominal). The sale will be subject to the terms and conditions spelt out in this notification (called Specific Notification) as also the terms and conditions specified in the General Notification No.Fin-2-C(12)-11/2003 dated July 20, 2007 of Government of Himachal Pradesh.
Object of the loan
1. (i) The proceeds of the State Government Securities will be utilized for the development programme of the Government of Himachal Pradesh.
(ii) Consent of Central Government has been obtained to the floatation of this loan as required by Article 293 (3) of the Constitution of India.
Method of Issue
2. Government Stock will be sold through the Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai Office (PDO) Fort, Mumbai-400 001 by auction in the manner as prescribed in paragraph 6.1 of the General Notification No.Fin-2-C(12)-11/2003, dated July 20, 2007 at a coupon rate to be determined by the Reserve Bank of India at the yield based auction under multiple price formats.
Allotment to Non-Competitive Bidders
3. The Government Stock upto 10% of the notified amount of the sale will be allotted to eligible individuals and institutions subject to a maximum limit of 1% of the notified amount for a10593 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 single bid as per the Revised Scheme for Non-Competitive Bidding Facility in the Auctions of State Government Securities of the General Notification (Annexure-II).
Place and Date of Auction
4. The auction will be conducted by the Reserve Bank of India, at its Mumbai Office, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 on February 20, 2018. Bids for the auction should be submitted in electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System as stated below on February 20, 2018.
(a) The competitive bids shall be submitted electronically on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System between 10:30AM and 12:00 PM.
(b) The non-competitive bids shall be submitted electronically on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System between 10:30 AM and 11:30 AM.
Result of the Auction
5. The result of the auction shall be displayed by the Reserve Bank of India on its website on the same day. The payment by successful bidders will be on February 21, 2018.
Method of Payment
6. Successful bidders will make payments on February 21, 2018 before close of banking hours by means of cash, bankers' cheque/pay order, demand draft payable at Reserve Bank of India Mumbai/New Delhi or a cheque drawn on their account with Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai(Fort)/New Delhi.
Tenure
7. The Stock will be of 10-year tenure. The tenure of the Stock will commence on February 21, 2018.
Date of Repayment
8. The loan will be repaid at par on February 21, 2028.
Rate of Interest
9. The cut-off yield determined at the auction will be the coupon rate percent per annum on the Stock sold at the auction. The interest will be paid on August 21 and February 21.
Eligibility of Securities
10. The investment in Government Stock will be reckoned as an eligible investment in Government Securities by banks for the purpose of Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) under Section 24 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The stocks will qualify for the ready forward facility.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Himachal Pradesh
Addl. Chief Secretary to the Government of Himachal Pradesh
Finance Department.
10594 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0आम जनता श्रीमती Anita Kumari बनाम
विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धारा 13(3) हिमाचल प्रदेश पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।
श्रीमती Anita Kumari पुत्री/पत्नी श्री, Pritam Chand, निवासी Garoh, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसके पुत्र का नाम Sahil Thakur का जन्म दिनांक 03-12-1995 है परन्तु एम0सी0/ग्राम पंचायत Garoh में जन्म पंजीकृत न है। अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें। इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त बच्चे Sahil Thakur का जन्म पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह अपना एतराज हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 17-02-2018 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा मुताबिक शपथ-पत्र जन्म तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।
आज दिनांक 19-01-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0प्र0।
-------------
ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0
आम जनता श्रीमती Shyam Lata बनाम
विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धारा 13(3) हिमाचल प्रदेश पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।
श्रीमती Shyam Lata पत्नी श्री, Parshottam Kumar, निवासी Dari, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसके पुत्र का नाम Shagun का जन्म दिनांक 15-09-2010 है परन्तु एम0सी0/ग्राम पंचायत Dharamshala में जन्म पंजीकृत न है। अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें। इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त बच्चे Shagun का जन्म पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह अपना एतराज हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 17-02-2018 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा मुताबिक शपथ-पत्र जन्म तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।
आज दिनांक 19-01-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0प्र0।10595 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 आम जनता श्री Pappu बनाम
विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धारा 13(3) हिमाचल प्रदेश पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता
श्री Pappu पुत्र श्री Madho Ram, निवासी Kandrehad, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसके पुत्र का नाम Pappu का जन्म दिनांक 05-06-2010 है परन्तु एम0सी0/ग्राम पंचायत Kandrehad में जन्म पंजीकृत न है। अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें। इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त बच्चे Pappu का जन्म पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह अपना एतराज हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 17-02-2018 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा मुताबिक शपथ-पत्र जन्म तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे। आज दिनांक 05-01-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0प्र0।
-------------
In the Court of Executive Magistrate Dharamshala, Tehsil Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P.
1. Shri Chaman Lal s/o Sh. Raghbir Singh, r/o Kaned, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra.
2. Smt. Mamta Devi d/o Sh. Hem Raj, r/o Rajiana, Tehsil Nagrota Bhagwan, District Kangra.
Versus
1. The General Public 2. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Dharamshala.
Whereas the above named applicants have made an application under section 8(4) of the H.P. Registration of Marriages Act, 1996 alongwith an affidavit stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 15-01-2017 but has not been found entered in the records of the Registrar of Marriages i. e. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Dharamshala.
And whereas, they have also stated that they were not aware of the laws of the registration of marriage with the Registrar of Marriages and now, therefore necessary orders for the registration of their marriage be passed so that their marriage is registered by the concerned authority.
Now, therefore, objections are invited from the general public that if anyone has any objection regarding the registration of the marriage of the above named applicants, then they should 10596 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 appear before the court of undersigned on 17-02-2018 at Tehsil Office Dharamshala at 10.00 A.M. either personally or through their authorized agent.
In the event of their failure to do so orders shall be passed ex-parte against the respondents for the registration of marriage without affording any further opportunity of being heard.
Issued under my hand and seal of the court on this__________
Seal.
Sd/-
Executive Magistrate,
Tehsil Dharamshala, Distt. Kangra.
___________
ब अदालत श्री लक्ष्मण सिह, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी थुरल, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 मुकद्दमा नं0 : 2018
तारीख पेशी : 26-02-2018 किस्म प्रकरण : जन्म पंजीकरण।
श्री रुमी राम पुत्र कृष्ण चन्द, निवासी गांव नलेहड, डाकघर व उप-तहसील थुरल, ग्राम पंचायत थुरल, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)
. .प्रार्थी।
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रतिवादी। विषय.--जन्म व मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 की धारा 13(3) के तहत जन्म पंजीकरण हेतु प्रार्थना-पत्र। प्रार्थी श्री रुमी राम पुत्र श्री कृष्ण चन्द, निवासी गांव नलेहड, डाकघर व उप-तहसील थुरल, ग्राम पंचायत थुरल, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय व्यान हल्फी पेश करते हुए आवेदन किया है कि उसके पुत्र संचित कुमार का जन्म दिनांक 09-09-2004 को गांव नलेहड, डाकघर व उप-तहसील ग्राम पंचायत थुरल में हुआ है। परन्तु अज्ञानतावश उसके जन्म का पंजीकरण स्थानीय ग्राम पंचायत अभिलेख में न करवाया गया है। अतः प्रार्थी इस न्यायालय के माध्यम से अपने पुत्र के जन्म पंजीकरण करने का आदेश ग्राम पंचायत थुरल को जारी करवाना चाहता है।
अतः प्रार्थी का आवेदन स्वीकार करते हुए इस इश्तहार मुस्त्री मुनादी द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति या संस्था को उपरोक्त संचित कुमार की जन्म तिथि 09-09-2004 के पंजीकरण बारे कोई उजर एवं एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 26-02-2018 को हाजिर अदालत होकर उजर व एतराज पेश कर सकता है बाद तारीख पेशी किसी किस्म का उजर एवं एतराज नहीं सुना जावेगा व उपरोक्त संचित कुमार पुत्र रुमी राम की जन्म तिथि को पंजीकरण करने का आदेश उप-स्थानीय पंजीकार जन्म व मृत्यु ग्राम पंचायत, थुरल को पारित कर दिया जाएगा।
यह इश्तहार मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से आज दिनांक 20-01-2018 जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी थुरल, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।10597 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 ब अदालत श्री लक्ष्मण सिह, नायब तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी थुरल, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 मुकद्दमा नं0 : 2018
तारीख पेशी : 26-02-2018 श्रीमती चंचला देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री प्रकाश चन्द, गांव घरथूं, डाकघर कौना, उप-तहसील थुरल, ग्राम पंचायत कौना, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)
. .प्रार्थिन।
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रतिवादी। विषय.--जन्म व मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 की धारा 13(3) के तहत जन्म पंजीकरण हेतु प्रार्थना-पत्र। श्रीमती चंचला देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री प्रकाश चन्द, गांव घरथूं, डाकघर कौना, उप-तहसील थुरल, ग्राम पंचायत कौना, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय व्यान हल्फी पेश करते हुए आवेदन किया है कि उसके पति प्रकाश चन्द पुत्र स्व0 श्री मेघ सिंह का देहान्त दिनांक 20-09-1986 को गांव घरथूं, ग्राम पंचायत कौना में हुआ है। परन्तु अज्ञानतावश उसके मृत्यु का पंजीकरण ग्राम पंचायत अभिलेख में न करवाया गया है। अतः प्रार्थिया इस न्यायालय के माध्यम से अपने पती स्व0 प्रकाश चन्द पुत्र स्व0 श्री मेघ सिंह की मृत्यु का पंजीकरण करने का आदेश ग्राम पंचायत कौना को जारी करवाना चाहती है।
अतः प्रार्थिया का आवेदन स्वीकार करते हुए इस इश्तहार मुस्त्री मुनादी व चस्पांगी द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति या संस्था को उक्त प्रकाश चन्द पुत्र स्व0 श्री मेघ सिंह का देहांत दिनांक 20-09-1986 के पंजीकरण बारे कोई उजर एवं एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 26-02-2018 को हाजिर अदालत होकर उजर व एतराज पेश कर सकता है बाद तारीख पेशी किसी किस्म का उजर एवं एतराज नहीं सुना जावेगा व उपरोक्त स्व0 प्रकाश चन्द पुत्र स्व0 श्री मेघ सिंह की मृत्यु का पंजीकरण करने का आदेश उप-स्थानीय पंजीकार जन्म व मृत्यु ग्राम पंचायत, कौना को पारित कर दिया जाएगा।
यह इश्तहार आज मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से दिनांक 20-01-2018 जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी थुरल, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।
------- ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0
आम जनता श्री Sukman Gale बनाम
विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धारा 13(3) हिमाचल प्रदेश पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता :
श्री Sukman Gale पुत्र श्री Sekha Gale, निवासी Slate Godam, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसकी पुत्री Meena का जन्म दिनांक 15-06-1975 को हुआ है परन्तु एम0सी0/ग्राम पंचायत Yol Cantt. में जन्म पंजीकृत न है अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें। इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त बच्चे Meena का जन्म पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो 10598 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 तो वह अपना एतराज हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 22-02-2018 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा मुताबिक शपथ-पत्र जन्म तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।
आज दिनांक 01-02-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा।
-------------
ब अदालत नायब तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकरी, तहसील खुण्डियां, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)
तारीख पेशी : 26-2-2018 केस नं0 : 2018/Misc.
1. श्री प्रेम सिंह पुत्र श्री बेली राम, निवासी गांव तली, डाकघर लगडू, तहसील खुण्डियां, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)।
बनाम
आम जनता
उनवान मुकद्दमा.--जेरे धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के तहत मृत्यु तिथि पंजीकरण। नोटिस बनाम आम जनता :
प्रार्थी श्री प्रेम सिंह पुत्र श्री बेली राम, निवासी गांव तली, डाकघर लगडू, तहसील खुण्डियां, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) ने स्वयं उपस्थित होकर प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया कि उसकी माता स्व0 श्रीमती सत्या देवी की मृत्यु दिनांक 18-03-2015 को गांव तली, डाकघर लगडू में हुई थी। परन्तु पंजीकरण कानून की जानकारी न होने के कारण ग्राम पंचायत लगडू तहसील खुण्डियां के अभिलेख में दर्ज न हो सकी है। अतः मृत्यु तिथि का पंजीकरण ग्राम पंचायत लगडू, तहसील खुण्डियां के अभिलेख में दर्ज किया जाये। अतः सर्वसाधारण को सुनवाई हेतु बजरिये इश्तहार व मुस्त्री मुनादी द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस सम्बन्ध में किसी प्रकार का उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 26-02-2018 को असालतन व वकालतन पेश होकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। उसके उपरान्त कोई भी उजर/एतराज जेरे समायत न होगा तथा श्रीमती सत्या देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री बेली राम, निवासी गांव तली, डाकघर लगडू की मृत्यु तिथि का पंजीकरण दिनांक 18-03-2015 जेरे धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के तहत ग्राम पंचायत लगडू के अभिलेख में दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।
आज दिनांक 27-01-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/-
नायब तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील खुण्डियां, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)।10599 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 ब अदालत जनाब सहायक समाहर्ता, द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0
मुकद्दमा संख्या : 11/NT/2017
तारीख दायरा : 11-10-2017 श्रीमती सत्या देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री अजीत सिंह पुत्र श्री सुमत सिंह, निवासी महाल राख, डाकघर . . प्रार्थिया। सिम्बल, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रत्यार्थी श्रीमती सत्या देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री अजीत सिंह पुत्र श्री सुमत सिंह, निवासी महाल राख, डाकघर सिम्बल, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) इस कार्यालय/न्यायालय में प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश किया है कि उसके स्व0 पति व ससुर का नाम आधार कार्ड, पंचायत रिकार्ड, सर्विस कार्ड व मृत्यु प्रमाण-पत्र में सही नाम श्री अजीत सिंह पुत्र स्व0 श्री सुमित सिंह दर्ज है परन्तु राजस्व अभिलेख महाल सिम्बल में इन्तकाल तस्दीक करते समय मेरे पति व ससुर का नाम जीता पुत्र मनसा राम दर्ज है जो कि गलत है। आवेदिका अपने स्व0 पति व ससुर का नाम राजस्व अभिलेख महाल सिम्बल, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 में श्री अजित सिंह पुत्र सुमित सिंह दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।
अतः आम जनता को इस राजपत्र हि0 प्र0 में प्रकाशित इश्तहार के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 16-02-2018 को अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर होकर अपना पक्ष रख सकते हैं। गैर हाजिरी की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जावेगी।
आज दिनांक 16-01-2018 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।
-------
ब अदालत जनाब सहायक समाहर्ता, द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0
मुकद्दमा संख्या : 12/NT/2017
तारीख दायरा : 20-11-2017 श्री राजू पुत्र श्री शंकर दास, निवासी गांव सलेहरा, डाकघर सलेहरा, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला . . प्रार्थी। कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रत्यार्थी श्री राजू पुत्र श्री शंकर दास, निवासी गांव व महाल सलेहरा, डाकघर सलेहरा, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) ने इस कार्यालय/न्यायालय में प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश किया है तथा उलेख किया है कि उसका नाम आधार कार्ड, परिवार रजिस्टर पत्र में सही नाम राजू दर्ज है परन्तु राजस्व अभिलेख महाल 10600 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 सलेहरा में मेरा नाम राजकुमार पुत्र शंकर दास दर्ज है जो कि गलत है। आवेदक अपना नाम राजस्व अभिलेख महाल सलेहरा में सही नाम राजू पुत्र श्री शंकर दास, निवासी गांव व डाकघर सलेहरा, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 में दर्ज करवाना चाहता है।
अतः आम जनता को इस राजपत्र इश्तहार प्रकाशित के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 16-02-2018 को अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर होकर अपना पक्ष रख सकते हैं। गैर हाजिरी की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जावेगी।
आज दिनांक 16-01-2018 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।
-------
ब अदालत जनाब सहायक समाहर्ता, द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0
मुकद्दमा संख्या : 13/NT/2017
श्री राजिन्द्र कुमार पुत्र श्री सीतु राम, निवासी गांव व डाकघर द्रुग, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला . . प्रार्थी। कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0)
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रत्यार्थी श्री राजिन्द्र कुमार पुत्र श्री सीतु राम, निवासी गांव व डाकघर द्रुग, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) ने इस कार्यालय/न्यायालय में प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश करके तथा उलेख किया है कि उसका नाम आधार कार्ड, परिवार रजिस्टर, पहचान-पत्र में सही नाम राजिन्द्र कुमार दर्ज है परन्तु राजस्व अभिलेख महाल द्रुग में मेरा नाम राजू पुत्र सीतु दर्ज है जो कि गलत है। आवेदक अपना नाम राजस्व अभिलेख महाल द्रुग में सही नाम राजिन्द्र पुत्र श्री सितु, निवासी गांव व डाकघर द्रुग, उप-तहसील चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 में दर्ज करवाना चाहता है।
अतः आम जनता को इस राजपत्र इश्तहार प्रकाशित के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 16-02-2018 को अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर होकर अपना पक्ष रख सकते हैं। गैर हाजिरी की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जावेगी।
आज दिनांक 16-01-2018 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, चढ़ियार, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।10601 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939
In the Court of Shri Sunny Sharma, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1. Tashi Dawa Barongpa s/o Late Shri Sonam Barongpa, resident of H.No. 366, Bala Behar Post Office Dhalpur, Tehsil & Distt. Kullu, ( H.P.)
2. Babita d/o Late Shri Dorje Angrup, resident of Village Mahili, Post Office Naggar, . . Applicants. Tehsil & District Kullu, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Tashi Barongpa and Babita have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 23-10-2017 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence their marriage may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this court on or before 18-02-2018. The objection received after 18-02-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 18-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
SUNNY SHARMA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Sunny Sharma, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1. Manoj Kumar s/o Shri Bahadur Singh, resident of Village & Post Office Mohal, Tehsil Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.
2. Anjali d/o Sh. Rajender Kumar, resident of Village Deodhar, Post Office Neoli, Tehsil . . Applicants. & District Kullu, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
10602 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Manoj Kumar and Anjali have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 25-09-2017 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence their marriage may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this court on or before 18-02-2018. The objection received after 18-02-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 18-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
SUNNY SHARMA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Sunny Sharma, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1. Sikander Singh Gill s/o Shri Kamaljit Singh Gill, resident of H.No.14, Bhupender Vihar, AWHO Complex Scheme No. 78 Indore, M.P.
2. Mamta Rani d/o Sh. Hari Dass, resident of H.No. 197 Barabhuin, Post Office & Tehsil . . Applicants. Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Sikander Singh Gill and Mamta Rani have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 01-02-2015 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence their marriage may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this court on or before 18-02-2018. The objection received after 18-02-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 18-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
SUNNY SHARMA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
10603 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939In the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the
powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2018 Date of Inst. : 19-01-2018 Pending for : 19-02-2018
Shri Suraj Bisht
V/s
General Public
Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General
Public for registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public.
Whereas, Shri Suraj Bisht s/o Shri Mohan Singh, r/o Ward No. 2 Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh District Solan, H. P. and Smt. Jainav Khatun d/o Sh. Fajjal w/o Shri Suraj Bisht s/o Shri Mohan Singh, r/o Ward No. 2 Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. have moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 01-10-2015.
And, whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits that they were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in general is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 19-02-2018 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 19-02-2018, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 19-01-2018.
Seal.
Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,
Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Chander Mohan Thakur, Assistant Collector (IInd Grade)-cum-Naib
(Tehsildar) Solan, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. 22/9 of 2017 :
Smt. Savita Sharma w/o Sh. Ravi Sharma r/o Village & P.O. Salogra, Tehsil & District Applicant. Solan, H. P.
Versus
10604 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Smt. Saroj w/o Sh. Tek Ram Verma, R/o Vill. Bail, P.O. Salogra, Tehsil & District Solan, . .Respondent. H.P.
Application under section 123 of H.P. Land Revenue Act for partition of the land comprised in the Khata/ Khatauni No. 11/12 Khasra No. 10, 24, 28, 45, 75, 108, 109, 116, 117 Kitta 9, measuring 31—06 Bigha, Khata/Kh. No. 14/15 Khasra No.1, 4, 6, 13, 14, 17, 22, 27, 30, 31, 33, 40, 50, 51, 60, 63, 65, 67, 69, 74, 76, 79, 87, 88, 91, 92, 95, 150, 106, 125, 126, 139, 142, Kitta 33 measuring 101-09-00 Bighas situated at Mouza Bail, Patwar Circle Salogra, Tehsil and District Solan, Himachal Pradesh.
Whereas in the above noted case it has been proved to the satisfaction of this court that the service upon the respondent mentioned below is not popssible by ordinary mode of service.
Hence this proclamation under order 5, Rule 20, of CPC is hereby issued against the respondents mentioned below the respondents to appear in this court on 19-02-2018 at 2.00 p.m. personally or through pleader to defend the case failing which she will be against exparte Notice to :—
1. Smt. Nidhi Thakur w/o Sh. Sukesh Kutty r/o of Vill. Bail, P.O. Salogra, Tehsil & District Solan.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 18-1-2018.
Seal.
CHANDER MOHAN THAKUR, Assistant Collector (IInd Grade)-cum-Naib (Tehsildar),
Solan, District Solan, H. P.
___________
In the Court of Shri Chander Mohan Thakur, Executive Magistrate (Naib-Tehsildar)
Solan, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. : 03/2018 Date of Institution : 08-02-2018 Date of Decision/ 07-03-2018 Smt. Laxmi Devi d/o Late Shri Jagdish Chand, r/o Village Devoli-ki-Ser, P.O. Basal, . .Applicant. Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh
Versus
General Public
. .Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Smt. Laxmi Devi d/o Late Shri Jagdish Chand, r/o Village Devoli-ki-Ser, P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has submitted an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other documents to enter the date of birth i.e. 07-05-1978 as her date of birth could not be entered in the record of Municipal Council Solan.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Laxmi Devi d/o Late10605 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 Sh. Jagdish Chand may submit their objection in writing in this court on or before 07-03-2018 at 10.00 A.M. failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 08th day of February, 2018.
Seal.
CHANDER MOHAN THAKUR, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),
Solan, District Solan, H. P.
_____________
HIMACHAL PRADESH THIRTEENTH VIDHAN SABHA
NOTIFICATION
Shimla–171004, the 13th February, 2018
No. V.S.-Legn. -Panel /1–21/2018.—In pursuance of Rule 12 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly, 1973, the Hon'ble Speaker is pleased to nominate the following Members on the panel of presiding Chairmen for the year 2018 :
1. Shri Ramesh Chand Dhawala (12 - Jawalamukhi)
2. Shri Narinder Bragta (65-Jubbal Kotkhai)
3. Shri Harshwardhan Chauhan (59-Shillai)
4. Shri Rakesh Pathania (6-Nurpur)
SUNDER SINGH VERMA, Secretary, H.P. Vidhan Sabha.
_____________
HIMACHAL PRADESH THIRTEENTH VIDHAN SABHA
NOTIFICATION
Shimla–171004, the 15st February, 2018
No. V.S.-Legn.-Pri/1-1/2018.—The following order by the Governor of the State of Himachal Pradesh, dated the 13th February, 2018 is hereby published for general information:—
''मैं, आचार्य देवव्रत, राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश, भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद 174 (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों के अनुसरण में हिमाचल प्रदेश तेरहवीं विधान सभा के द्वितीय सत्र का आ]वान मंगलवार, 6 मार्च, 2018 को पूर्वाह्न 11.00 बजे से हिमाचल प्रदेश विधान सभा, शिमला मेें समवेत होने के लिए करता हूं।
आचार्य देवव्रत,
राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश।''
By Order:-
(SUNDER SINGH VERMA), Secretary, H.P. Vidhan Sabha.
10606 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 16 फरवरी, 2018/27 माघ, 1939 हिमाचल प्रदेश तेरहवीं विधान सभाअधिसूचना
शिमला-171004, 15 फरवरी, 2018
सं0ःवि0स0-विधायन-प्रा0/1-1/2018.--राज्यपाल महोदय का निम्नलिखित आदेश दिनांक 13 फरवरी, 2018 सर्वसाधारण की सूचनार्थ प्रकाशित किया जाता है :--
''मैं, आचार्य देवव्रत, राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश, भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद 174 (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों के अनुसरण में हिमाचल प्रदेश तेरहवीं विधान सभा के द्वितीय सत्र का आ]वान मंगलवार, 6 मार्च, 2018 को पूर्वाह्न 11.00 बजे से हिमाचल प्रदेश विधान सभा, शिमला में समवेत होने के लिए करता हूं।
आचार्य देवव्रत,
राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश।''
आदेश द्वाराः-
(सुन्दर सिंह वर्मा)
सचिव,
हि0 प्र0 विधान सभा । नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है