Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 26, 07 May 2018

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित

सोमवार, 7 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

LAW DEPARTMENT

NOTICE

Shimla-2, the 4th May, 2018

No. LLR-E(9)-12/2018-Leg.—Whereas, Shri Mohit Kumar, Advocate, District Courts Una, H.P. has applied for appointment of Notary Public in Sub-Division Una of District Una (H.P.) under rule 4 of the Notaries Rules, 1956.

26-राजपत्र/2018-07-05-2018 (1045) 1046 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 Therefore, I undersigned in exercise of the power conferred vide Government Notification No. LLR-A(2)-1/2014-Leg. dated 1st July, 2017, hereby issue notice under rule 6, (2) (b) of the Notaries Rules, 1956, for the information of general public for inviting objections, if any, within a period of seven days from the date of publication of this notice in Rajpatra, H.P. against his appointment as a Notary Public in Sub- Division Una of District Una (H.P.).

Sd/- (Competent Authority), DLR-cum-Deputy Secretary (Law-English) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 6th March, 2018

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2012-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Raman Kant s/o Shri Roshan Lal, r/o Village Tatohali, P.O. Sidhpur, Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. had submitted his demand notice dated 13.08.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh vested with the powers of appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the industrial dispute at a belated stage after period of nearly about 8 years from the date of his alleged illegal termination and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22.03.2012 for adjudication;

And whereas Shri Raman Kant s/o Shri Roshan Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference for adjudication of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 2646/2013. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has dismissed the civil writ petition on 18.06.2013. Thereafter, Shri Raman Kant s/o Shri Roshan Lal agitated the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court dated 18.06.2013 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide Civil Appeal No. 18012-18013 of 2017 Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 30103- 30104 of 2017). The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has decided the Civil Appeal (above) on 06.11.2017. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows:

"5. Therefore, these appeals are allowed with a direction to respondent No.-1 that the

cases of the appellants shall also be considered for reference, ignoring the objection

in the matter of delay.

6. Needful be done within two months from the date of production of a copy of this

judgment."

1047 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940

Therefore, in view of above Judgment/directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) make a reference to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Raman Kant s/o Shri Roshan Lal, r/o Village Tatohali, P.O. Sidhpur, Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01.09.2002 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the …. March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Aaso Ram s/o Shri Prahlad, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub- section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub- section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Aaso Ram s/o Shri Prahlad, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the1048 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Angrejo s/o Shri Basu, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Angrejo s/o Shri Basu, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1049 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2018

No.11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Basheer Deen s/o Shri Munshi Deen, r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 06.12.2014;

And whereas Shri Basheer Deen s/o Shri Munshi Deen agitated the above orders of declining of reference before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 449/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 03.03.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision

within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4- 9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014, and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Basheer Deen s/o Shri Munshi Deen, r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during July, 1989 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after nearly 22 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of nearly 22 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1050 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 27th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Bhuri Singh s/o Shri Amar Singh, r/o V.P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 06.12.2014;

And whereas Shri Bhuri Singh s/o Shri Amar Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 407/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 02.03.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows:—

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision

within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Bhuri Singh s/o Shri Amar Singh, r/o V.P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1987 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after nearly 23 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of nearly 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1051 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Budhi Singh s/o Shri Saran Dass, r/o V.P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Budhi Singh s/o Shri Saran Dass agitated the above orders of declining of reference before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 419/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 02.03.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows:—

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision

within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4- 9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014, and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Budhi singh s/o Shri Saran Dass, r/o V.P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after nearly 21 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of nearly 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1052 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 6th March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Chhanga Ram s/o Shri Chaudhary Ram, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15thFebruary, 2014 and as per power vested under sub- section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Chhanga Ram s/o Shri Chaudhary Ram, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 7th March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Gianu s/o Shri Mohan, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

1053 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Gianu s/o Shri Mohan, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th March, 2018

No. 11-3/93(Lab)ID/2018/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Jagdish Chand s/o Shri Polo Ram, c/o Sukh Dassi Devi, r/o Village Aloe, P.O. Manali, District Kullu, H.P. and (i) the Managing Director, Sterling Holiday Resorts (India) Limited, City Tower, Floor No. 7, 3rd Cross Street, Kasturba Nagar, Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, (ii) the Manager, Sterling Holiday White Mist, Manali, District Kullu, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during May, 2014.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub- section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour 1054 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Jagdish Chand s/o Shri Polo Ram, c/o Sukh Dassi Devi, r/o Village Aloe, P.O. Manali, District Kullu, H.P. during May, 2014 by (i) the Managing Director, Sterling Holiday Resorts (India) Limited, City Tower, Floor No. 7, 3rd Cross Street, Kasturba Nagar, Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu, (ii) the Manager, Sterling Holiday White Mist, Manali, District Kullu, H.P., without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 6th March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Jotu Ram s/o Shri Hoshiyara, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub -ection 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Jotu Ram s/o Shri Hoshiyara, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,1055 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 7th March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Karmo s/o Shri Sidar, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Karmo s/o Shri Sidar, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1056 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 17th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Khem Raj s/o Shri Nant Ram, r/o V.P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 25 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 25.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Khem Raj s/o Shri Nant Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 423/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 03.03.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a

decision within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Khem Raj s/o Shri Nant Ram, r/o V.P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during August, 1986 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after nearly 25 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view the delay of nearly 25 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1057 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 7th March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Kishori Lal s/o Shri Prabhu Ram, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Kishori Lal s/o Shri Prabhu Ram, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Man Singh s/o Shri Jaram Singh, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/sSahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

1058 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub- section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Man Singh s/o Shri Jaram Singh, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 6th March, 2018

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sato Ram s/o Shri Hans Raj, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman).

1059 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Sato Ram s/o Shri Hans Raj, r/o Village Banotu, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2016 (as alleged by the workman) by the General Manager, M/s Sahoo Hydro Power Project, Village Kurtha, P.O. Saho, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Shyam Lal s/o Shri Punnu Ram, r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Suliyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 24 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Shyam Lal s/o Shri Punnu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 401/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 01.03.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows:

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the

writ petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered

accordingly. The writ petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with

all pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4- 9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014, and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to 1060 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Shyam Lal s/o Shri Punnu Ram, r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Suliyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1987 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after nearly 24 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view the delay of nearly 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 6th February, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2018/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Subhash Chand s/o Shri Rasil Singh, r/o Village Kalduan, P.O. & Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during November, 1999 to August, 2008 and finally during September, 2008, as per demand notice dated 17-12-2011.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Subhash Chand s/o Shri Rasil Singh, r/o Village Kalduan, P.O. & Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. during November, 1999 to August, 2008 and finally during September, 2008 as alleged by the claimant vide demand notice dated 17-12-2011 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes1061 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ Management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Surinder Singh s/o Shri Girdhari Singh, r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 24 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Surinder Singh s/o Shri Girdhari Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 446/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 08.03.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows:

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision

within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications,

if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4- 9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:

1062 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 "Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Surinder Singh s/o Shri Girdhari Singh r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during July, 1987 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after nearly 24 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of nearly 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 15th February, 2018

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2018/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Vijay Kumar s/o Shri Prem Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Charatgarh, District Una, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Manager, M/s GVK Emergency Management Research Institute Emergency Management Centre, Village Dharampur, Shimla Chandigarh Highway, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the Managing Director, GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Devar Yamzal, Medchal Road, Secundrabad, Telangna (Corporate Office) on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 04-08-2016.

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Vijay Kumar s/o Shri Prem Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Charatgarh, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 04-08-2016 by (i) the Employer/Manager, M/s GVK Emergency Management Research Institute Emergency Management Centre, Village Dharampur, Shimla Chandigarh Highway, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the Managing Director, GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Devar Yamzal, Medchal Road, Secundrabad, Telangna (Corporate Office), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of1063 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/Management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 2nd February, 2018

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2018/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Vivek Gagga s/o Late Shri Roshan Singh, r/o Village Badhala, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Manager, M/s GVK Emergency Management Research Institute Emergency Management Centre, Village Dharampur, Shimla Chandigarh Highway, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the Managing Director, GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Devar Yamzal, Medchal Road, Secundrabad, Telangna (Corporate Office) on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 30-06-2016 and transfer vide letter dated 27-05-2016.

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Vivek Gagga s/o Late Shri Roshan Singh, r/o Village Badhala, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 30-06-2016 and transfer vide letter dated 27-05-2016 by (i) the Employer/Manager, M/s GVK Emergency Management Research Institute Emergency Management Centre, Village Dharampur, Shimla Chandigarh Highway, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the Managing Director, GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Devar Yamzal, Medchal Road, Secundrabad, Telangna (Corporate Office), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/Management?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

1064 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 सूचना एवं जन-सम्पर्क विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 28 अप्रैल, 2018

संंख्याः पब-ए 3(55)99. - हिमाचल प्र्र्रदेेश के राज्यपाल, भारत के संंंंविधान के अनुच्छेेद 309 के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग के परामर्श स,े हिमाचल प्रदेश सूचना एवं जन-सम्पर्क विभाग में कला सहायक, वगर्- III (अराजपत्रित), के पद के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न उपाबन्ध-''क'' के अनुसार भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम बनाते ह,ैं अर्थात्‌ः--

1. संक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ.--(1) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हिमाचल प्रदेश सूचना एवं जन-सम्पर्क विभाग, कला सहायक, वगर्- III (अराजपत्रित), भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम, 2018 ह।ै

(2) ये नियम राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशित किए जाने की तारीख से प्रवृत्त होंग।े 2. निरसन और व्यावृत्तियां.--(1) इस विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्याः पब.ए(3)55/99 तारीख 05-03-2009 द्वारा अधिसूचित हिमाचल प्रदेश सूचना एवं जन सम्पर्क विभाग कला सहायक, वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित) भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम, 2009 का एतद्‌द्वारा निरसन किया जाता है।

(2) ऐेसेे निरसन केे होेतेे हुुए भी उपर्युुक्त उप-नियम 2(1) केे अधीन इस प्र्रकार निरसित सुसंंगत नियमोेंं केे अधीन की गर्ई कोेर्ई नियुुक्ति, बात या कार्रवार्ई इन नियमोेंं केे अधीन विधिमान्य रूप मेेंं की गर्ई समझी जाएगी।

आदेेश द्वारा, मनीषा नन्दा, अतिरिक्त मुुख्य सचिव (सूूचना एवंं जन सम्पर्क)।

-----------

उपाबन्ध-''क'' सूचना एवंंंं जन सम्पर्क विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश में कला सहायक, वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित) केेेे पद केेेे लिए भर्र्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम

1. पद का नाम.--कला सहायक

2. पद (पदा)ें की संख्या.--01 (एक)

3. वर्गीकरण.--वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित)

4. वेतनमान.--(i) नियमित पदधारी (पदधारिया)ेेंं के लिए वेतनमान.--`10300-34800 ` 3200/- ग्र्रेेड्रेड्रेड प।ेे।ेे

(ii) संविदा पर नियुक्त कर्मचचारी (कर्मचारिया)ें के लिए उपलब्धियां. --स्तम्भ संख्या 15-क में दिए गए ब्यौरे केेेे अनुसार ` 13,500/- प्रतिमास।

5. चयन पद अथवा अचयन पद.--लागू नहीं1065 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 6. सीधी भर्ती के लिए आयु.--18 से 45 वर्ष : परन्तु सीधे भर्ती किए जाने वाले व्यक्तियों के लिए ऊपरी आयु सीमा तदर्थ या संविदा के आधार पर नियुक्त किए गए व्यक्तियों सहित पहले से ही सरकारी सेवा में रत अभ्यर्थियों को लागू नहीं होगी :

परन्तु यह और कि यदि तदर्थ या संविदा के आधार पर नियुक्त किया गया अभ्यर्थी इस रूप में नियुक्ति की तारीख को अधिक आयु का हो गया हा,े तो वह उसकी ऐसी तदर्थ या संविदा पर की गई नियुक्ति के कारण विहित आयु में शिथिलीकरण का पात्र नहीं होगा :

परन्तु यह और कि ऊपरी आयु सीमा म,ें अनुसूचित जातियों/अनुसूचित जनजातियों/अन्य पिछड़ा वर्गों और व्यक्तियों के अन्य प्रवर्गों के लिए, उस विस्तार तक शिथिलीकरण किया जाएगा जितनी कि हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार के साधारण या विशेष आदेश (आदेशों) के अधीन अनुज्ञेय है :

परन्तु यह और भी कि समस्त पब्लिक सैक्टर निगमों तथा स्वायत्त निकायों के सभी कर्मचारियों का,े जो ऐसे पब्लिक सैक्टर निगमों/स्वायत्त निकायों के प्रारम्भिक गठन के समय ऐसे पब्लिक सैक्टर निगमों/स्वायत्त निकायों में आमेलन से पूर्व सरकारी कर्मचारी थ,े सीधी भर्ती के लिए आयु सीमा में ऐसी ही रियायत अनुज्ञात की जाएगी जैसी सरकारी कर्मचारियों को अनुज्ञेय ह,ै ऐसी रियायत तथापि, पब्लिक सेक्टर निगमों/स्वायत्त निकायों के ऐसे कर्मचारिवृन्द को अनुज्ञेय नहीं होगी जो तत्पश्चात्‌ ऐसे निगमों/स्वायत्त निकायों द्वारा नियुक्त किए गये थे/किए गए हैं और उन पब्लिक सैक्टर निगमों/स्वायत्त निकायों के प्रारम्भिक गठन के पश्चात्‌ ऐसे निगमों/स्वायत्त निकायों की सेवा में अन्तिम रूप से आमेलित किए गए हैं/किए गए थे ।

टिप्पण.- - सीधी भर्ती के लिए आयु सीमा की गणना, उस वर्ष के प्रथम दिवस से की जाएगी जिसमें कि पद (पदा)ें को आवेदन आमंत्रित करने के लिए, यथास्थिति, विज्ञापित किया गया है या नियोजनालयों को अधिसूचित किया गया है।

7. सीधे भर्ती किए जाने वाले व्यक्ति (व्यक्तिया)ें के लिए अपेक्षित न्यूनतम शैक्षिक और अन्य अर्हताएं.--(क) अनिवार्य अर्हता(एं).--(i) किसी मान्यता प्राप्त स्कूल शिक्षा बोर्ड से दसवीं की परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण की हा।े

(ii) केन्द्रीय/राज्य सरकार से मान्यता प्राप्त संस्थान से कॉमर्शियल आर्ट में कम से कम चार वर्ष का डिप्लोमा।

(ख) वांछनीय अर्हता(एं).-- हिमाचल प्रदेश की रूढ़िया,ें रीतियों और बोलियों का ज्ञान और प्रदेश में विद्यमान विशिष्ट दशाओं में नियुक्ति के लिए उपयुक्तता।

8. सीधे भर्ती किए जाने वाले व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) के लिए विहित आयु और शैक्षिक अर्हताएं प्रोन्नत व्यक्ति (व्यक्तिया)ें की दशा में लागू हाेंगी या नहीं.--आयुः--लागू नहीं।

शैक्षिक अर्हताः--लागू नहीं।

9. परिवीक्षा की अवधि, यदि कोई हो.--(क) दो वषर्, जिसका एक वर्ष से अनधिक ऐसी और अवधि के लिए विस्तार किया जा सकेगा जैसा सक्षम प्राधिकारी विशेष परिस्थितियों में और कारणों को लिखित में अभिलिखित करके आदेश दे ।

(ख) संविदा के आधार पर, सेवाधृति के आधार पर नियुक्ति पर, अधिवर्षिता के पश्चात्‌ पुनर्नियोजन और आमेलन पर कोई परिवीक्षा नहीें होगी। 1066 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 10. भर्ती की पद्धतिः भर्ती सीधी होगी या प्रोन्नति/सैकण्डमैंट/स्थानांतरण द्वारा और विभिन्न पद्धतियों द्वारा भरे जाने वाले पद (पदा)ें की प्रतिशत्‌ता.--शतप्रतिशत सीधी भर्ती द्वारा, यथास्थिति, नियमित आधार पर या संविदा के आधार पर भर्ती द्वारा, ऐसा न होने पर सैकण्डमैंट आधार पर।

11. प्रोन्नति/सैकण्डमैंट/स्थानांतरण द्वारा भर्ती की दशा में वे श्रेणियां (गे्रड) जिनसे प्रोन्नति/सैकण्डमैंट/स्थानांतरण किया जाएगा.--हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार के विभागों/केन्द्रीय सरकार के विभागों में इस पद के समरूप वेतनमान में कार्यरत पदधारियों में से सैकण्डमैंट आधार पर।

12. यदि विभागीय प्रोन्नति/स्थायीकरण समिति विद्यमान हो, तो उसकी संरचना.--(क) विभागीय प्रोन्नति समितिः-- लागू नही।ं

(ख) विभागीय स्थायीकरण समितिः--जैसी सरकार द्वारा समय-समय पर गठित की जाए। 13. भर्ती करने में जिन परिस्थितियों में हिमाचल प्रदेश, लोक सेवा आयोग से परामर्श किया जाएगा.--जैसा विधि द्वारा अपेक्षित हो ।

14. सीधी भर्ती के लिए अनिवार्य अपेक्षा.--किसी सेवा या पद पर नियुक्ति के लिए अभ्यर्थी का भारत का नागरिक होना आवश्यक है।

15. सीधी भर्ती द्वारा पद पर नियुक्ति के लिए चयन.--सीधी भर्ती के मामले में पद पर नियुक्ति के लिए चयन, लिखित परीक्षा के गुणागुण तथा इन नियमों से संलग्न परिशिष्ट-I में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट रीति के अनुसार मूल्यांक के आधार पर किया जाएगा या यदि, यथास्थिति, हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग या अन्य भर्ती अभिकरण/प्राधिकरण ऐसा करना आवश्यक या समीचीन समझे तो लिखित परीक्षा के गुणागुण और इन नियमों से संलग्न परिशिष्ट-I में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट रीति के अनुसार मूल्यांकन तथा पूर्व में ली गई छंटनी परीक्षा (वस्तुनिष्ठ प्रकार की) या व्यावहारिक परीक्षा या दक्षता परीक्षा या शारीरिक परीक्षण के आधार पर किया जाएगा, जिसका स्तर/पाठ्‌यक्रम आदि, यथास्थिति, हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग/अन्य भर्ती अभिकरण/प्राधिकरण द्वारा अवधारित किया जाएगा।

15-क. संविदा नियुक्ति द्वारा पद पर नियुक्ति केेेे लिए चयन.--इन नियमों में किसी बात के होते हुए भी पद पर संविदात्मक नियुक्तियां नीचे दिए गए निबन्धनों और शर्तों के अध्यधीन की जाएंगीः-- (I) संकल्पना.--(क) इस पॉलिसी के अधीन हिमाचल प्रदेश सूचना एवं जन सम्पर्क विभाग हिमाचल प्रदेश में कला सहायक को संविदा के आधार पर प्रारम्भ में एक वर्ष के लिए लगाया जाएगा जिसे वर्षानुवर्ष के आधार पर आगे बढ़ाया जा सकेगा :

परन्तु संविदा अवधि में वर्षानुवर्ष आधार पर विस्तारण/नवीकरण के लिए सम्बद्ध विभागाध्यक्ष यह प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करेगा कि संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति की सेवा और आचरण वर्ष के दौरान संतोषजनक रहा है और केवल तभी उसकी संविदा की अवधि को नवीकृत/विस्तारित की जाएगी । (ख) पद का हिमाचल प्रदेश कर्मचारी चयन आयोग के कार्यक्षेत्र में आना.--निदेशक, सूचना एवं जन सम्पर्क विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश, रिक्त पदों को संविदा के आधार पर भरने के लिए सरकार का अनुमोदन प्राप्त करने के पश्चात्‌, अध्यपेक्षा को सम्बद्ध भर्ती अभिकरण अर्थात्‌ हिमाचल प्रदेश कर्मचारी चयन आयोग, हमीरपुर के समक्ष रखेगा।

(ग) चयन इन नियमों में विहित पात्रता शर्तों के अनुसार किया जाएगा ।

(II) संविदात्मक उपलब्धियां.--संविदा के आधार पर नियुक्त कला सहायक को 13,500/- रूपए की दर से समेकित नियत संविदात्मक रकम (जो पे बैण्ड के न्यूनतम जमा गे्रड पे के बराबर1067 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 होगी) प्रतिमास संदत्त की जाएगी। यदि संविदा में एक वर्ष से अधिक की बढ़ौतरी की जाती ह,ै तो पश्चात्‌वर्ती वर्ष/वर्षों के लिए संविदात्मक उपलब्धियों में 405/- रूपए की रकम (पद के पे बैण्ड का न्यूनतम जमा गे्रड पे का तीन प्रतिशत) वार्षिक वृद्धि के रूप में अनुज्ञात की जाएगी।

(III) नियुक्ति/अनुशासन प्राधिकारीः--निदेशक, सूचना एवं जन सम्पर्क विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश नियुक्ति और अनुशासन प्राधिकारी होगा।

(IV) चयन प्रक्रियाः--संविदा नियुि क्त के मामले में पद पर नियुक्ति के लिए चयन, लिखित परीक्षा के गुणागुण तथा इन नियमों से संलग्न परिशिष्ट-I में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट रीति के अनुसार मूल्यांकन के आधार पर किया जाएगा या यदि, ऐसा करना आवश्यक या समीचीन समझा जाए तो लिखित परीक्षा के गुणागुण और इन नियमों से संलग्न परिशिष्ट-I में यथा विनिर्दिष्ट रीति के अनुसार मूल्यांकन तथा पूर्व में ली गई छंटनी परीक्षा (वस्तुनिष्ठ प्रकार की) या व्यावहारिक परीक्षा या दक्षता परीक्षा या शारीरिक परीक्षण के आधार पर किया जाएगा, जिसका स्तर/पाठ्‌यक्रम आदि, सम्बद्ध भर्ती अभिकरण अर्थात्‌ हिमाचल प्रदेश कर्मचारी चयन आयोग, हमीरपुर द्वारा अवधारित किया जाएगा।

(V) संविदात्मक नियुक्तियों के लिए चयन समितिः--जैसी सम्बद्ध भर्ती अभिकरण अर्थात्‌ हिमाचल प्रदेश कर्मचारी चयन आयोग, हमीरपुर द्वारा समय-समय पर गठित की जाए।

(VI) करारः--अभ्यर्थीे को चयन के पश्चात्‌ इन नियमों से संलग्न परिशिष्ट-II के अनुसार करार हस्ताक्षरित करना होगा ।

(VII) निबन्धन और शर्तेंः--(क) संविदा पर नियुक्त कला सहायक को 13,500/-रूपए की दर से नियत संविदात्मक रकम (जो पे बैंड के न्यूनतम जमा ग्रेड पेे के बराबर होगी) प्रतिमास संदत्त की जाएगी। संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति आगे बढाए गए वर्षों के लिए संविदात्मक रकम में 405/-रूपए (पे बैण्ड के न्यूनतम जमा ग्रेड पे का तीन प्रतिशत) की दर से वांिर्षक वृद्धि का हकदार होगा और अन्य कोई सहबद्ध प्रसुविधाएं जैसे कि वरिष्ठ/चयन वेतनमान आदि नहीं दिया जाएगा ।

(ख) संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति की सेवा पूर्णतया अस्थायी आधार पर होगी। यदि संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति का कार्य/आचरण ठीक नहीं पाया जाता है तो नियुक्ति पर्यवसित (समाप्त) किए जाने के लिए दायी होगी।

(ग) संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति एक कलैण्डर वर्ष में एक मास की सेवा पूरी करने के पश्चात्‌ एक दिन के आकस्मिक अवकाश, दस दिन के चिकित्सा अवकाश और पांच दिन के विशेष अवकाश का हकदार होगा/होगी। संविदा पर नियुक्त महिला कर्मचारी के दो जीवित बच्चों तक एक सौ अस्सी दिन का प्रसूति अवकाश दिया जा सकेगा। संविदा पर नियुक्त महिला कर्मचारी पूरी सेवा के दौरान, गर्भपात हो जाने सहित गर्भपात कराने की दशा म,ें प्राधिकृत चिकित्सा अधिकारी द्वारा जारी प्रमाण पत्र प्रस्तुत करने पर पैंतालीस दिन से अनधिक प्रसूति अवकाश (जीवित बच्चों की संख्या का विचार किए बिना) के लिए भी हकदार होगी। वह चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति और एल0टी0सी0 आदि के लिए हकदार नहीं होगा/होगी। संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त के सिवाय किसी अन्य प्रकार का कोई अवकाश अनुज्ञात नहीं होगा।

अनुपभुक्त आकस्मिक अवकाश, चिकित्सा अवकाश और विशेष अवकाश एक कलैण्डर वर्ष तक संचित किया जा सकेगा और आगामी कलैण्डर वर्ष के लिए अग्रनीत नहीं किया जाएगा।

(घ) नियन्त्रक अधिकारी के अनुमोदन के बिना कत्र्तव्य (ड्‌यूटी) से अनधिकृत अनुपस्थिति से स्वतः ही संविदा का पर्यवसान (समापन) हो जाएगा। तथापि आपवादिक मामलों में जहां पर चिकित्सा आधार पर कत्र्तव्य से अनधिकृत अनुपस्थिति के हालात संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति के नियन्त्रण से बाहर हों तो उसके नियमितिकरण के मामले में विचार करते समय ऐसी अवधि अपवर्जित नहीं की जाएगी, 1068 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 किन्तु पदधारी को इस बाबत समय पर नियन्त्रक प्राधिकारी को सूचित करना होगा। तथापि संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति कत्र्तव्य से अनुपस्थिति की ऐसी अवधि के लिए संविदात्मक रकम का हकदार नहीं होगा :

परन्तु उसे सरकार के प्रचलित अनुदेशों के अनुसार, चिकित्सा अधिकारी द्वारा जारी किए गए बीमारी/आरोग्य प्रमाण-पत्र को प्रस्तुत करना होगा।

(ङ) संविदा के आधार पर नियुक्त पदधारी जिसने तैनाती के एक स्थान पर तीन वर्ष का कार्यकाल पूर्ण कर लिया हा,े आवश्यकता के आधार पर स्थानान्तरण हेतु पात्र होगा, जहां भी प्रशासनिक आधारों पर अपेक्षित हा।े

(च) चयनित अभ्यर्थी को सरकारी/रजिस्ट्रीकृत चिकित्सा व्यवसायी से अपना आरोग्य प्रमाण-पत्र प्रस्तुत करना होगा। बारह सप्ताह से अधिक की गर्भवती महिला अभ्यर्थी प्रसव होने तक अस्थायी तौर पर अनुपयुक्त बनी रहेगी। ऐसी महिला अभ्यर्थी का किसी प्राधिकृत चिकित्सा अधिकारी/व्यवसायी द्वारा उपयुक्तता के लिए पुनः परीक्षण करवाया जाएगा।

(छ) संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति का, यदि अपने पदीय कत्र्तव्यों के सम्बन्ध में दारै े पर जाना अपेक्षित हा,े तो वह उसी दर पर, जैसी कि नियमित प्रतिस्थानी पदधारी को वेतनमान के न्यूनतम पर लागू ह,ै यात्रा भत्ते/दैनिक भत्ते का हकदार होगा ।

(ज) नियमित कर्मचारियों की दशा में यथा लागू सेवा नियमों जैसे एफ0आर0-एस0आर0, छुट्‌टी नियम, साधारण निधि नियम, पैंशन नियम तथा आचरण नियम आदि के उपबंध संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्तियों की दशा में लागू नहीं होंगे। संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्तियों को कर्मचारी सामूहिक बीमा स्कीम के साथ-साथ इर्. पी.एफ/जी.पी.एफ भी लागू नहीं होगा।

16. आरक्षण.--सेवा में नियुक्ति, हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा, समय-समय पर अनुसूचित जातियों/ अनुसूचित जनजातियों/अन्य पिछडे वर्गों और व्यक्तियों के अन्य प्रवर्ग के लिए सेवा में आरक्षण की बाबत जारी किए गए आदेशों के अधीन होगी ।

17. विभागीय परीक्षा.--लागू नही।ं

18. शिथिल करने की शक्ति.--जहां राज्य सरकार की यह राय हो कि ऐसा करना आवश्यक या समीचीन ह,ै वहां वह, कारणों को लिखित में अभिलिखित करके और हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग के परामर्श स,े आदेश द्वारा, इन नियमों के किसी/किन्ही उपबन्ध (उपबन्धा)ें को किसी वर्ग या व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) के प्रवर्ग या पद (पदा)ें की बाबत, शिथिल कर सकेगी।

-----------

परिशिष्ट-I

वर्ग-III केेेे पदोेंेंेंं केेेे लिए

1.	लिखित परीक्षा {लिखित परीक्षा में प्राप्तांकों की प्रतिशतता 85 अंकाें में से परिकलित की जानी ह।ै उदाहरणाथर्, लिखित परीक्षा में 50 प्रतिशत अंक प्राप्त करने वाले अभ्यर्थी को 42.5 अंक दिए जाएंगे}।	85 अंक
2.	अभ्यर्थी का मूल्यांकन निम्नलिखित रीति में किया जाना हःै - i) भर्ती और प्रान्नति नियमों में विहित न्यूनतम शैक्षिक अर्हता हेतु अधिमान ( =2.5 अंक {शैक्षिक अर्हता में प्राप्तांकों की प्रतिशतता 0.025 से गुणा की जाएगी। उदाहरणाथर्, किसी व्यष्टि ने अपेक्षित शैक्षिक अर्हता में 50 प्रतिशत अंक प्राप्त किए ह,ैं जो उसे 1.25 अंक (50 × 0.025=1.25) अनुज्ञात किए जाएंगे}। ii) यथास्थिति, अधिसूचित पिछड़े क्षेत्र या पंचायत से सम्बन्धित =01 अंक ( iii) भूमिहीन कुटुम्ब/एक हैक्टेयर से कम भूमि वाले कुटुम्ब को सम्बद्ध ( राजस्व प्राधिकारी द्वारा प्रमाणित किया जाएगा =01 अंक iv) इस प्रभाव का गैर-नियोजन प्रमाण-पत्र कि कुटुम्ब का कोई भी सदस्य ( सरकारी/अर्ध-सरकारी सेवा में नहीं है =01 अंक v) 40 प्रतिशत विकृति/निःशक्तता/दुर्बलता से अधिक वाले दिव्यांगजन ( = 01 अंक ( vi) एन.एस.एस. (कम से कम एक वषर्) एन.सी.सी. म ं प्रमाण-पत्र े धारक/भारत स्काउट और गाइड/राष्ट्रीय स्तर की खेल स्पधार्अ ों में =01 अंक पदक विजेता vii) सरकार द्वारा समय-समय पर यथाविहित 40,000 रूपए से कम (समस्त ( स्त्रोतों से) वार्षिक आय वाला बी0पी0एल0 कुटुम्ब =02 अंक viii) विधवा/तलाक शुदा/अकिंचन/एकल महिला =01 अंक ( ix) इकलौती पुत्री/अनाथ =01 अंक ( x) किसी मान्यता प्राप्त विश्वविद्यालय/संस्था से आवेदित पद से सम्बन्धित ( कम से कम छह मास की अवधि का प्रशिक्षण =01अंक ( xi) सरकारी/अर्धसरकारी संगठन म,ें आवेदित पद से सम्बन्धित अधिकतम पांच वर्ष तक का अनुभव (प्रत्येक पूर्ण किए गए वर्ष के लिए 0.5 अंक) =2.5 अंक	15 अंक

परिशिष्ट-''II'' कला सहायक और हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार के मध्य निदेशक, सूचना एवं जन सम्पर्क विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश के माध्यम से निष्पादित की जाने वाली संविदा/करार का प्ररूप

यह करार श्री/श्रीमति .................................... पुत्र/पुत्री श्री ..................................निवासी.................................. ........................................... संि वदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्‌ प्रथम पक्षकार कहा गया है) और हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल के मध्य निदेशक, सूचना एवं जन सम्पर्क विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्‌ द्वितीय पक्षकार कहा गया है) के माध्यम से आज तारीख....................................को किया गया। 1070 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 द्वितीय पक्षकार ने उपरोक्त प्रथम पक्षकार को लगाया है आरै पथ््र ाम पक्षकार कला सहायक के रूप में संविदा के आधार पर निम्नलिखित निबन्धन आरै शर्तांे पर सेवा करने के लिए सहमति दी हैः-- 1. यह कि पथ््र ाम पक्षकार कला सहायक के रूप में.....................से पा्र रम्भ होने आरै ............................. .को समाप्त होने वाले दिन तक एक वर्ष की अवधि के लिए द्वितीय पक्षकार की सेवा में रहेगा। यह विनिर्दिष्ट रूप से उल्लिखित किया गया है और दोनों पक्षकाराें द्वारा करार पाया गया है कि प्रथम पक्षकार की द्वितीय पक्षकार के साथ संविदा, आखिरी कार्य दिवस्‌ अथार्त ्‌ ...... ............................. को स्वयंमेव ही पर्यवसित (समाप्त) हो जाएगी तथा सूचना नोटिस आवश्यक नहीं होगा :

परन्तु संविदा अवधि में वर्षानुवर्ष आधार पर विस्तारण/नवीकरण के लिए सम्बद्ध विभागाध्यक्ष यह प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करेगा कि संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति की सेवा आरै आचरण वर्ष के दारै ान संतोषजनक रहा है और केवल तभी उसकी संविदा की अवधि नवीकृत/विस्तारित की जाएगी।

2. प्रथम पक्षकार की संविदात्मक रकम.......................................रूपए प्रतिमास होगी।

3. प्रथम पक्षकार की सेवा पूर्णतया अस्थायी आधार पर हागे ी। यदि संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति का कार्य/आचरण ठीक नहीं पाया जाता है तो नियुक्ति पर्यवसित (समाप्त) की जाने के लिए दायी होगी।

4. संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति एक कलैण्डर वर्ष में एक मास की सेवा पूरी करने के पश्चात्‌ एक दिन के आकस्मिक अवकाश, दस दिन के चिकित्सा अवकाश आरै पांच दिन के विशेष अवकाश का हकदार होगा/होगी। संविदा पर नियुक्त महिला को दो जीवित बच्चों तक एक सौ अस्सी दिन का प्रसूति अवकाश दिया जा सकेगा। संविदा पर नियुक्त महिला कर्मचारी पूरी सेवा के दौरान, गर्भपात हो जाने सहित गर्भपात कराने की दशा म,ें प्राधिकृत चिकित्सा अधिकारी द्वारा जारी प्रमाण-पत्र प्रस्तुत करने पर पैंतालीस दिन से अनधिक प्रसूति अवकाश (जीवित बच्चों की संख्या का विचार किए बिना) के लिए भी हकदार होगी। संविदा पर नियुक्त कर्मचारी चिकित्सा प्रतिपूर्ति और एल0टी0सी0 आदि के लिए हकदार नहीं होगा/होगी। संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त के सिवाय अन्य किसी प्रकार का कोई अवकाश अनुज्ञात नहीं होगा।

अनुपभुक्त आकस्मिक अवकाश, चिकित्सा अवकाश और विशेष अवकाश एक कलैण्डर वर्ष तक संचित किया जा सकेगा और आगामी कलैण्डर वर्ष के लिए अग्रनीत नहीं किया जाएगा। 5. नियन्त्रक प्राधिकारी के अनुमोदन के बिना कर्त्तव्य (ड्‌यूटी) से अनधिकृत अनुपस्थिति से स्वतः ही संविदा का पर्यवसान (समापन) हो जाएगा। तथापि आपवादिक मामलों में जहां पर चिकित्सा आधार पर कर्त्तव्य से अनधिकृत अनुपस्थिति के हालात संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति के नियन्त्रण से बाहर हाें तो उसके नियमितिकरण के मामले में विचार करते समय ऐसी अवधि अपवजिर्त नहीं की जाएगी, किन्तु पदधारी को इस बाबत समय पर नियन्त्रक प्राधिकारी को सूचित करना होगा। तथापि संि वदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति कत्र्तव्य से अनुपस्थिति की ऐसी अवधि के लिए संविदात्मक रकम का हकदार नहीं होगा :

परन्तु उसे सरकार के प्रचलित अनुदेशों के अनुसार, चिकित्सा अधिकारी द्वारा जारी किए गए बीमारी/आरोग्य प्रमाण-पत्र को प्रस्तुत करना हागे ा।

6. संविदा के आधार पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति जिसने तैनाती के स्थान पर तीन वर्ष का कार्यकाल पूर्ण कर लिया हा,े आवश्यकता के आधार पर स्थानान्तरण हेतु पात्र होगा/होगी, जहां भी प्रशासनिक आधाराें पर अपेक्षित हो।1071 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 7. चयनित अभ्यर्थी को सरकारी/रजिस्ट्रीकतृ चिकित्सा व्यवसायी से अपना आरोग्य प्रमाण-पत्र प्रस्तुत करना होगा। महिला अभ्यर्थियों की दशा म,ें बारह सप्ताह से अधिक की गर्भावस्था प्रसव होने तक, उसे अस्थायी तौर पर अनुपयुक्त बना देगी। ऐसी महिला अभ्यर्थी का किसी प्राधिकतृ चिकित्सा अधिकारी/व्यवसायी से उपयुक्तता के लिए पुनः परीक्षण करवाया जाना चाहिए।

8. संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति का यदि अपने पदीय कर्त्तव्यों के सम्बन्ध में दारै े पर जाना अपेि क्षत हा,े तो वह उसी दर पर, जैसी कि नियमित प्र ितस्थानी पदधारी को पद के वेतनमान के न्यन्ू ातम पर लागू है, यात्रा भत्ते/दैनिक भत्ते का हकदार होगा/होगी।

9. संविदा पर नियुक्त व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) को कर्मचारी सामूहिक बीमा स्कीम के साथ-साथ इर्0 पी0एफ/जी0पी0 एफ0 भी लागू नहीं होगा।

इसके साक्ष्यस्वरूप प्रथम पक्षकार आरै द्वितीय पक्षकार के साक्षियाें की उपस्थिति में इसमें सर्वपथ््र ाम उल्लिखित तारीख को अपन-े अपने हस्ताक्षर कर दिए है।

साक्षियों की उपस्थिति मेेंेंेंं :

1. ----------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------ (नाम व पूरा पता )

2. ----------------------------

------------------------------

(नाम व पूरा पता )

(प्रथम पक्षकार केेेे हस्ताक्षर) साक्षियों की उपस्थिति में

1. ----------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------ (नाम व पूरा पता )

2. ----------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------ (नाम व पूरा पता )

(द्वितीय पक्षकार केेेे हस्ताक्षर) 1072 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 [Authoritative English text of this Department's Notification No. PUB-A 3(55)/99, dated 28-4- 2018 as required under Article 348 (3) of the Constitution of India].

INFORMATION & PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 28th April, 2018

No. Pub-A 3(55)/99.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, is pleased to make the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Art Assistant, Class-III (Non-Gazetted) in the Information and Public Relations Department, Himachal Pradesh as per Annexure- "A" attached to this notification, namely:—

1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh, Information and Public Relations Department, Art Assistant, Class-III (Non-Gazetted), Recruitment & Promotion Rules, 2018.

(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Repeal and savings.—(1) The Himachal Pradesh, Department of Information and Public Relations, Art Assistant, Class-III (Non-Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2009 notified vide this Department Notification No. Pub A-(3)55/99, dated 05-03-2009 are hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any appointment made or anything done or any action taken under the rules so repealed under sub-rule 2(1) supra, shall be deemed to have been validly made, or done or taken under these rules.

By order,

MANISHA NANDA, Additional Chief Secretary (I&PR).

_____________

ANNEXURE-"A" RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF ART ASSISTANT (NON-GAZETTED) CLASS-III, IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS, HIMACHAL PRADESH

1. Name of post.—Art Assistant

2. Number of post.—01 (One)

3. Classification.—Class-III (Non-Gazetted)

4. Scale of Pay.—(i) Pay scale for regular incumbent(s):—`10300-34800+`3200/- Grade Pay.

1073 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940

(ii) Emoluments for contract employee(s):— `13,500/- P.M. as per details given in Column No. 15-A.

5. Whether "Selection" post or "Non-Selection" post.—Not applicable

6. Age for direct recruitment.—Between 18 to 45 years :

Provided that the upper age limit for direct recruits shall not be applicable to the candidates already in service of the Government including those who have been appointed on adhoc or on contract basis :

Provided further that if a candidate appointed on adhoc basis or on contract basis had become over-age on the date he was appointed as such, he shall not be eligible for any relaxation in the prescribed age limit by virtue of his such adhoc or contract appointment :

Provided further that upper age limit is relaxable for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Other Backward Classes and Other categories of persons to the extent permissible under the general or special order(s) of the Himachal Pradesh Government:

Provided further that the employees of all the Public Sector Corporations and Autonomous Bodies who happened to be Government servants before absorption in Public Sector Corporations/Autonomous Bodies at the time of initial constitution of such Corporations/ Autonomous Bodies shall be allowed age concession in direct recruitment as admissible to Government servants. This concession will not, however, be admissible to such staff of the Public Sector Corporations/Autonomous Bodies who were/are subsequently appointed by such Corporations/Autonomous Bodies and who are/were finally absorbed in the service of such Corporations/Autonomous Bodies after initial constitution of the Public Sector Corporations/Autonomous Bodies.

NOTE:—Age limit for direct recruitment will be reckoned on the first day of the year in which the post(s) is/are advertised for inviting applications or notified to the Employment Exchanges or as the case may be.

7. Minimum educational and other qualifications required for direct recruit(s).—(a) Essential Qualification(s):—(i) Matric from a recognized Board of School Education.

(ii) At least 04 years diploma in Commercial Art from an Institution recognized by the Central/State Government.

( b) Desirable Qualification (s):—Knowledge of customs, manners and dialects of Himachal Pradesh and suitability for appointment in the peculiar conditions prevailing in the Pradesh.

8. Whether age and educational qualification(s) prescribed for direct recruit(s) will

apply in the case of the promotee(s).—Age:— Not applicable.

Educational Qualification:—Not applicable.

9. Period of probation, if any.—(a) Two years subject to such further extension for a period not exceeding one year as may be ordered by the competent authority in special circumstances and reasons to be recorded in writing.

(b) No probation in case of appointment on contract basis, tenure basis, re-employment after superannuation and absorption.

1074 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 10. Method(s) of recruitment-whether by direct recruitment or by promotion/ secondment/ transfer and the percentage of post(s) to be filled in by various methods:— 100% by direct recruitment on regular basis or by recruitment on contract basis, as the case may be, failing which on secondment basis.

11. In case of recruitment by promotion/secondment/transfer, grade from which promotion/secondment/transfer is to be made.—On secondment basis from amongst the incumbents of this post working in the identical pay scale from the H.P. Government Departments/ Central Government Departments.

12. If a Departmental Promotion/Confirmation Committee exists, what is its composition?.—(a) Departmental Promotion Committee:—Not applicable.

(b) Departmental Confirmation Committee:—As may be constituted by the Government from time to time.

13. Circumstances under which the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission

(H.P.P.S.C) is to be consulted in making recruitment.—As required under the law.

14. Essential requirement for a direct recruitment.—A candidate for appointment to any service or post must be a citizen of India.

15. Selection for appointment to the post by the direct recruitment.—Selection for appointment to the post in the case of direct recruitment shall be made on the basis of merit of written examination followed by evaluation as specified in Appendix-I appended to these Rules, or if the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission or other recruiting agency / authority, as the case may be, so considers necessary or expedient on the basis of merit of written examination followed by evaluation as specified in Appendix-I appended to these Rules, preceded by a screening test (objective type) or practical test or skill test or physical test, the standard /syllabus, etc. of which, will be determined by the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission/other recruiting agency / authority, as the case may be.

15.A. Selection for appointment to the post by contract appointment.—Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules, contract appointment to the post will be made subject to the terms and conditions given below:—

(I) CONCEPT:—(a) Under this policy, the Art Assistant in the Department of Information & Public Relations Himachal Pradesh, will be engaged on contract basis initially for one year; which may be extendable on year-to-year basis :

Provided that for extension/renewal of contract period on year to year basis the concerned HOD shall issue a certificate that the service and conduct of the contract appointee is satisfactory during the year and only then his/her period of contract is to be renewed/extended.

(b) POST FALLS WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF HPSSC:—The Director of Information & Public Relations, Himachal Pradesh after obtaining the approval of the Government to fill up the vacant posts on contract basis will place the requisition with the concerned recruiting agency i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission, Hamirpur.

1075 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940

(II) CONTRACTUAL EMOLUMENTS:—The Art Assistant appointed on contract basis will be paid consolidated fixed contractual amount @ ` 13,500/- P.M. (which shall be equal to minimum of the pay band+ grade pay). An amount of @ ` 405/- (3% of the minimum of pay band + grade pay of the post) as annual increase in contractual emoluments for the subsequent year(s) will be allowed, if contract is extended beyond one year.

(III) APPOINTING/DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY:—The Director, Information & Public Relations, H.P. will be the appointing and the disciplinary authority.

(IV) SELECTION PROCESS:—Selection for appointment to the post in the case of contract appointment shall be made on the basis of merit of written examination followed by evaluation as specified in Appendix-I appended to these Rules, or if considered necessary or expedient on the basis of merit of written examination followed by evaluation as specified in Appendix-I to these Rules, preceded by a screening test (objective type) or practical test or skill test or physical test, the standard/syllabus, etc. of which, will be determined by the concerned recruiting agency i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission, Hamirpur.

(V) COMMITTEE FOR SELECTION OF CONTRACTUAL APPOINTMENTS:—As may be constituted by the concerned recruiting agency i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission, Hamirpur, from time to time.

(VI) AGGREMENT:—After selection of a candidate, he/she shall sign an agreement as per Appendix-II appended to these Rules.

(VII) TERMS AND CONDITIONS:—(a) The contract appointee will be paid fixed contractual amount @ `13,500/- P.M. (which shall be equal to minimum of pay band + grade pay). The contract appointee will be entitled for increase in contractual amount @ ` 405/- (3% of the minimum of pay band + grade pay of the post) for further extended years and no other allied benefits such as senior/selection scales etc. will be given.

(b) The service of the contract appointee will be purely on temporary basis. The appointment is liable to be terminated in case the performance/conduct of the contract appointee is not found satisfactory.

(c) The contract appointee will be entitled for one day's casual leave after putting one- month service, 10 days medical leave and 5 days special leave, in a calendar year. A female contract appointee with less than two surviving children may be granted maternity leave for 180 days. A female contract appointee shall also be entitled for maternity leave not exceeding 45 days (irrespective of the number of surviving children) during the entire service, in case of miscarriage including abortion, on production of medical certificate issued by the authorized Government Medical Officer. A contract employee shall not be entitled for Medical Re- imbursement and LTC etc. No leave of any other kind except above is admissible to the contract appointee.

Un-availed Casual Leave, Medical Leave and Special Leave can be accumulated upto the Calendar Year and will not be carried forward for the next Calendar Year.

(d) Unauthorized absence from the duty without the approval of the controlling officer shall automatically lead to the termination of the contract. However, in exceptional cases where the circumstances for un-authorized absence from duty were beyond his/her control on medical grounds, such period shall not be excluded while considering his/her case for regularization but the incumbent shall have to intimate the controlling authority in this regard well in time.

1076 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 However, the contract appointee shall not be entitled for contractual amount for this period of absence from duty:

Provided that he/she shall submit the certificate of illness/fitness issued by the Medical Officer, as per prevailing instructions of the Government.

(e) An official appointed on contract basis who has completed three years tenure at one place of posting will be eligible for transfer on need based basis wherever required on administrative grounds.

(f) Selected candidate will have to submit a certificate of his/her fitness from a Government/Registered Medical Practitioner. Women candidate pregnant beyond 12 weeks will stand temporarily unfit till the confinement is over. The women candidate will be re-examined for fitness from an authorized Medical Officer/Practitioner.

(g) Contract appointee will be entitled to TA/DA if required to go on tour in connection with his/her official duties at the same rate as applicable to regular counterpart official at the minimum of pay scale.

(h) Provision of service rules like FR SR, Leave Rules, GPF Rules, Pension Rules & Conduct Rules etc. as are applicable in case of regular employees will not be applicable in case of contract appointees. The Employees Group Insurance Scheme as well as EPF/GPF will also not be applicable to contract appointee(s).

16. Reservation.—The appointment to the service shall be subject to orders regarding reservation in the service for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Other Backward Classes/Other Categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.

17. Departmental examination.—Not applicable.

18. Power to relax.—Where the State Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission relax any of the provision(s) of these Rules with respect to any class or category of person(s) or post(s).

_____________

APPENDIX-I

FOR CLASS-III POST

1.	WRITTEN TEST (Percentage of marks obtained in written examination to be calculated out of 85 marks. For example, a candidate getting 50% marks in written examination will be given 42.5 marks).	85 Marks
2.	E valuation of candidate to be made in the following manner:— ( i) Weightage for the minimum educational qualification prescribed in the Recruitment & Promotion Rules =2.5 Marks	1 5 Marks
	(Percentage of marks obtained in the educational qualification would be multiplied by 0.025. For example, an individual has secured 50% the required educational qualification, he/she will be allowed marks in 1.25 marks (50 X 0.025=1.25). ( ii) Belonging to notified Backward Area or Panchayat, as the case may be = 01 Mark ( iii) Land less family/family having land less than 1 Hectare to be = 01 Mark certified by the concerned Revenue Authority ( iv) Non-employment Certificate to the effect that none of the family members is in Government/Semi-Government service = 01 Mark ( v) Differently abled persons with more than 40% impairment/ disability/infirmity = 01 Mark ( vi) NSS (atleast one year)/ certificate holders in NCC/the Bharat Guide/Medal winner in National Level sports Scout and competitions = 01 Mark ( vii) BPL family having annual income (from all sources) below Rs. 40,000/- or as prescribed by the Govt. from time to time = 02 Mark ( viii) Widow/divorced/destitute/single women = 01 Mark ( ix) Single daughter/Orphan = 01 Mark ( x) Training of atleast 6 months duration related to the post applied = 01 Mark for from a recognized University/Institution ( xi) Experience upto a maximum of 5 years in Government/Semi to the post applied for (0.5 Government Organization relating Marks only for each completed year) = 2.5 Mark

APPENDIX-II Form of contract/agreement to be executed between the Art Assistant and the Government of Himachal Pradesh through Director, Information & Public Relations.

This agreement is made on this --------------------day of -----------in the year ---------

between Sh./Smt……… …………………….. s/o/d/o Sh.---------------------------r/o/------------------

Contract appointee (hereinafter called the FIRST PARTY), and the Governor of Himachal Pradesh through Director, I&PR Himachal Pradesh (here-in-after called the SECOND PARTY). Whereas, the SECOND PARTY has engaged the aforesaid FIRST PARTY and the FIRST PARTY has agreed to serve as a Art Assistant on contract basis on the following terms & conditions :

1078 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 1. That the First Party shall remain in the service of the Second Party as Art Assistant for a period of one year commencing on day of -------------------and ending on the day of--------------------. It is specifically mentioned and agreed upon by both the parties that the contract of the--------- FIRST PARTY with SECOND PARTY shall ipso- facto stand terminated on the last working day i.e on ……………………... and information notice shall not be necessary:

Provided that for further extension/renewal of contract period, the HOD shall issue a certificate that the service and conduct of the contract appointee was satisfactory during the year and only then the period of contract is to be renewed/extended.

2. The contractual amount of the FIRST PARTY will be Rs. ------------ per month.

3. The service of FIRST PARTY will be purely on temporary basis. The appointment is liable to be terminated in case the performance/conduct of the contract appointee is not found satisfactory.

4. The contract appointee will be entitled for one day's Casual Leave after putting one month's service, 10 day's Medical Leave and 5 day's Special Leave in a calendar year. A female contract appointee with less than two surviving children may be granted Maternity Leave for 180 days'. A female contract appointee shall also be entitled for maternity leave not exceeding 45 days' (Irrespective of the number of surviving children) during the entire service, in case of miscarriage including abortion, on production of medical certificate issued by the authorized Government Medical officer. A contract employee shall not be entitled for Medical Re- imbursement and LTC etc. No leave of any other kind except above is admissible to the contract appointee.

Un-availed Casual Leave, Medical Leave and Special Leave can be accumulated upto the Calendar Year and will not be carried forward for the next Calendar Year.

5. Unauthorized absence from the duty without the approval of the Controlling Officer shall automatically lead to the termination of the contract. However, in exceptional cases where the circumstances for un-authorized absence from duty were beyond his/her control on medical ground, such period shall not be excluded while considering his/her case for regularization but the incumbent shall have to intimate the controlling authority in this regard well in time. However, the contract appointee shall not be entitled for contractual amount for this period of absence from duty :

Provided that he/she shall submit the certificate of illness/fitness issued by the Medical Officer, as per prevailing instructions of the Government.

6. An official appointed on contract basis who has completed three years tenure at one place of posting will be eligible for transfer on need based basis wherever required on administrative grounds.

7. Selected candidate will have to submit a certificate of his/her fitness from a Government/Registered Medical Practitioner. In case of women candidates pregnant1079 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 beyond twelve weeks will render her temporarily unfit till the confinement is over. The women candidates should be re-examined for fitness from an authorized Medical Officer/Practitioner.

8. Contract appointee shall be entitled to TA/DA if required to go on tour in connection with his/her official duties at the same rate as are applicable to regular counter-part official at the minimum of pay scale.

9. The employees Group Insurance Scheme as well as EPF/GPF will not be applicable to contractual appointee(s).

IN WITNESS of the FIRST PARTY AND SECOND PARTY have herein to set their hands the day, month and year first above written.

In the Presence of Witness :

(Name and full address)

1. …………………………………

…………………………………

(Name and full address)

2. …………………………………

…………………………………

SIGNATURE OF THE FIRST PARTY In the Presence of Witness :

(Name and full address)

1. …………………………………

…………………………………

(Name and full address)

2. …………………………………

…………………………………

SIGNATURE OF THE SECOND PARTY

____________

1080 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-02, the 4th May, 2018

No. TPT-C(9)-4/2017-loose.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 41 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (No. 59 of 1988) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf is pleased to allot /release registration marks/number from Serial No. 0001 to 9999 under the Registration marks HP 40-E to Registering and Licensing Authority, Kangra Distt. Kangra Himachal Pradesh, for registration of motor vehicles, with effect from the publication in the H.P. Rajpatra (Extra Ordinary) in the public interest.

By order, (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) Additional Chief Secretary (Transport).

__________

In the Court of Deepti Mandhotra HPAS, Sub-Divisional Magistrate Chamba,

District Chamba (H. P.)

Soham Kaushal s/o Late Sh. R.K. Kaushal, resident of palace Road Mohalla Bangotu, Tehsil & District Chamba, H. P., aged 36 years (Husband).

and

Nitika d/o Shri Rakesh Kant, resident of Mohalla Upper Julakari, Tehsil & Distt. Chamba, . . Applicants. H.P. aged 34 years (Wife)

Versus

1. The General Public 2. The Registrar of Marriage Himachal Pradesh, Shimla

Subject.— Registration of Marriage under Section 8(4) of the H.P. Registration of Marriage Act,

1996 (Act No. 21of 1997).

Whereas, the above named applicants have made an application before me under section 8(4) of H.P. Registration of Marriage Act, 1996 alongwith relevant record and affidavits stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on dated 24-02-2008 at their place of residence with Hindu rites and customs but due to some un-avoidable circumstances it could not be entered in the records of Municipal Council Chamba, Distt. Chamba, H.P. well in time;

And whereas, they have also stated that they were not aware of the laws for the registration of marriage with the registrar of marriage and now, therefore, necessary order for the registration of their marriage be passed, so that their marriage could be registered by the concerned authority.

Now, therefore, objections are invited from the general public that if, anyone has nay objection regarding the registration of marriage of above named applicants, they should appear1081 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 before the undersigned in my court on or before 17-05-2018 at 2.00 P.M. either personally or through their authorised agent/pleader.

In the event of their failure to do so, orders shall be passed ex-parte for the registration of marriage without affording any further opportunity of being heard.

Issued under my hand and seal of the Court on this 16-04-2018.

Seal.

DEEPTI MANDHOTRA HPAS, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chamba, District Chamba (H.P.).

_________

In the Court of Deepti Mandhotra HPAS, Sub-Divisional Magistrate Chamba,

District Chamba (H. P.)

Deepak Mehra s/o Late Shri Satish Kumar, resident of Mohalla Bangotu, Chamba Town, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P., aged 30 years (Husband) .

and

Babita Kumari d/o Shri Dev Prakash, resident of Village & Post Office Sarol, Tehsil & District Chamba, aged 29 years (Wife)

. . Applicants.

Versus

1. The General Public 2. The Registrar of Marriages Himachal Pradesh, Shimla

Subject.— Registration of Marriage under Section 8(4) of the H.P. Registration of Marriage Act,

1996 (Act No. 21of 1997).

Whereas, the above named applicants have made an application before me under section 8(4) of H.P. Registration of Marriage Act, 1996 alongwith relevant record and affidavits stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on dated 02-03-2014 at their place of residence with Hindu rites and customs but due to some un-avoidable circumstances it could be entered in the records of Municipal Council Chamba, Distt. Chamba, H.P. well in time;

Now, therefore, objections are invited from the general public that if, anyone has nay objection regarding the registration of marriage of above named applicants, they should appear before the undersigned in my court on or before 25-05-2018 at 2.00 P.M. either personally or through their authorised agent/pleader.

1082 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 In the event of their failure to do so, orders shall be passed ex-parte for the registration of marriage without affording any further opportunity of being heard.

Issued under my hand and seal of the Court on this 19-04-2018.

Seal.

DEEPTI MANDHOTRA HPAS, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chamba, District Chamba (H.P.).

_________

ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भलेई, जिला चम्बा (हि0 प्र0) श्री बिन्दरो राम पुत्र सोभिया, गांव सगरुट, परगना व उप-तहसील भलेई, जिला चम्बा (हि0 प्र0)

. . प्रार्थी

बनाम

आम जनता

. . फरीकदोयम। प्रार्थना-पत्र बाबत नाम दरुस्ती जेर धारा 37(2) हि0 प्र0 भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 के अन्तर्गत करने बारे। प्रार्थी श्री बिन्दरो राम पुत्र सोभिया, गांव सगरुट, परगना व उप-तहसील भलेई, जिला चम्बा (हि0 प्र0) ने निवेदन किया है कि ग्राम पंचायत औहरा के परिवार रजिस्टर के रिकार्ड में मेरा नाम बिन्दरो राम दर्ज है जोकि सही व दरुस्त है लेकिन राजस्व रिकार्ड महाल सगरुट के भू-इन्द्राज में मेरा नाम बिन्दरो ही दर्ज है जोकि गलत दर्ज है इसलिए महाल सगरुट के भू-राजस्व के इन्द्राज में मेरा नाम बिन्दरो उर्फ बिन्दरो राम दरुस्त करवाना चाहता हूं।

अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को प्रार्थी उक्त के नाम दरुस्त करने बारा कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 21-05-2018 को प्रातः 10.00 बजे असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर होकर अपना उजर व एतराज लिखित रूप में पेश करें अन्यथा प्रार्थी का नाम दरुस्त करने बारा आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे। इसके उपरान्त कोई भी उजर व एतराज काबिले समायत न होगा।

आज दिनांक 12-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, भलेई, जिला चम्बा (हि0 प्र0)।

-------

In the Court of Shri Arindam Chaudhary, I.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional

Magistrate, Hamirpur, H.P.

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Rakesh Singh aged 26 year s/o Shri Joginder Singh, r/o Village Kadhriana, P.O Didwin, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)1083 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 2. Smt. Kiran aged 21 year d/o Sh. Piar Chand, r/o Village Gajoh, P.O. Ropa, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.

.. Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for registration of Marriage.

Rakesh Singh and Kiran filed an application u /s 15 & 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they stated that Marriage be solemnized between us on dated 14-04-2018.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 25-05-2018. The objection received after will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 20-04-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur. H.P.

______________________________

In the Court of Shri Arindam Chaudhary, I.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional

Magistrate, Hamirpur, H.P.

In the matter of :

1. Shri Nirlesh Kharial aged 36 years s/o Late Shri Jagdish Chand, r/o House No. 123, Ward No. 3 Partap Nagar, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.).

2. Smt. Nisha Devi w/o Late Shri Balbir Singh, r/o V.P.O. Bhakreri, Tehsil Barsar, .. Applicants. Distt. Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public .. Respondents.

Subject.— Notice for registration of Marriage.

Sh. Nirlesh Kaharial and Nisha Devi filed an application u/s 05 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they stated that marriage be solemnized between us within three calendar months.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this 1084 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 court on or before 30-05-2018. The objection received after 30-03-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 21-04-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur , H.P.

______________

ब अदालत विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी, बड़सर, उप-मण्डल बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 1. कमलजीत सिंह पुत्र श्री किशोरी लाल, निवासी गांव कलौहण, डा0 बुम्वलू, तह0 बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0।

2. सावित्री देवी पुत्री श्री दुर्गा दास, विधवा अजीत पाल, गांव दरकोटी, डा0 झझयाणी, तह0 बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0। . . प्रार्थी।

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी। आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी एक व दो ने इस न्यायालय में विवाह पंजीकरण करवाने का आवेदन किया है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता व उपरोक्त आवेदनकर्ता के माता-पिता को इस विवाह के पंजीकरण बारे एतराज हो तो दिनांक 01-06-2018 या इससे पूर्व प्रातः 10.00 बजे इस न्यायालय में आपाि दर्ज करवा सकते हैंं। इस तिथि के बाद कोई उजर स्वीकार नहीं किया जावेगा। आज दिनांक 24-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर एवं मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी, बड़सर, उप-मण्डल बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0।

------- ब अदालत विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी, बड़सर, उप-मण्डल बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 1. राजेश कुमार सपुत्र श्री राम दास, गांव व डा0 महारल, तह0 बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर हि0 प्र0। 2. दीपिका सपुत्री श्री बलदेव सिंह, गांव चौकी, डा0 बडाग्रां, तह0 बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0 प्र0)। . . प्रार्थी।

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी।1085 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी एक व दो ने इस न्यायालय में विवाह पंजीकरण करवाने का आवेदन किया है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता व उपरोक्त आवेदनकर्ता के माता-पिता को इस विवाह के पंजीकरण बारे एतराज हो तो दिनांक 01-06-2018 या इससे पूर्व प्रातः 10.00 बजे इस न्यायालय में आपाि दर्ज करवा सकते हैंं। इस तिथि के बाद कोई उजर स्वीकार नहीं किया जावेगा। आज दिनांक 24-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर एवं मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

--------

ब अदालत श्री सुरिन्दर कुमार, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 13/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 52, खतौनी नं0 120, खसरा नम्बरान 632, किाा 01, रकबा तादादी 0-63-11 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, जौंगा राम पुत्र श्री बंगाली, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, सागर चन्द, विनोद कुमार, मिलाप चन्द पुत्रान श्री प्रशोत्तम चन्द, ओंकार चन्द, हरबंश लाल, महावीर पुत्रान श्री पूर्ण, सावित्री देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री पूर्ण, रतन चन्द पुत्र श्री चुहडू, सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है।

अतः उपरोक्त फरीकैन को इस ईश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि वह असालतन या वकालतन दिनांक 25-05-2018 को सुबह 11.00 बजे इस अदालत में हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज इस तकसीम बारा पेश कर सकता है हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।1086 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 ब अदालत श्री सुरिन्दर कुमार, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 15/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 50, खतौनी नं0 117, खसरा नम्बरान 482, 483, 484, 485, 1004/486, 487, 631 किाा 07, रकबा तादादी 0-60-04 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, सागर चन्द, विनोद कुमार, मिलाप चन्द पुत्रान श्री प्रशोत्तम चन्द, ओंकार चन्द, हरबंश लाल, देवी दास, महावीर पुत्रान श्री पूर्ण, सावित्री देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री पूर्ण, सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है।

अतः उपरोक्त फरीकैन को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि वह असालतन या वकालतन दिनांक 25-05-2018 को सुबह 11.00 बजे इस अदालत में हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज इस तकसीम बारा पेश कर सकता है हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

----------

मिसल नं0 16/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 49, खतौनी नं0 115, 116, खसरा नम्बरान 697, 696, किाा 02, रकबा तादादी 0-29-18 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, रोशन लाल, रजय सिंह, मदन लाल, देव राज, प्यारे लाल, रमेश चन्द पुत्रान श्री मोती, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार1087 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, ओंकार चन्द, हरबंश लाल, देवी दास, महावीर पुत्रान श्री पूर्ण, सावित्री देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री पूर्ण, सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

----------

मिसल नं0 17/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 48, खतौनी नं0 112, 113, 114 खसरा नम्बरान 685, 692, 691, 690, किाा 04, रकबा तादादी 0-52-53 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, रोशन लाल, राय सिंह, मदन लाल, देव राज, प्यारा लाल, रमेश चन्द पुत्रान श्री मोती, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, ओंकार चन्द, हरबंश लाल, देवी दास, महावीर पुत्रान श्री पूर्ण, सावित्री देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री पूर्ण, सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।1088 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 ब अदालत श्री सुरिन्दर कुमार, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी एवं नायब तहसीलदार कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 18/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 47, खतौनी नं0 109, 110, 111 खसरा नम्बरान 698, 700, 702, 699, 701, 703, किाा 06, रकबा तादादी 0-20-88 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, यशोद्धा, शीला पत्नी स्व0 श्री जैसे राम, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, सागर चन्द, विनोद कुमार, मिलाप चन्द पुत्र श्री प्रशोत्तम दास, देवराज, प्यारा लाल, मदन लाल, रोशन लाल, राय सिंह, रमेश चन्द पुत्रान श्री मोती पुत्र श्री किरपा सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है। अतः उपरोक्त फरीकैन को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि वह असालतन या वकालतन दिनांक 25-05-2018 को सुबह 11.00 बजे इस अदालत में हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज इस तकसीम बारा पेश कर सकता है हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

----------

मिसल नं0 19/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 46, खतौनी नं0 105, 106, 107, 108 खसरा नम्बरान 876, 700, 881, 882, 884, 885, 886, 892, 899, 887, 890, 891, किाा 11, रकबा तादादी 0-34-31 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, यशोद्धा, शीला पत्नी स्व0 श्री जैसे राम, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री1089 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, सागर चन्द, विनोद कुमार, मिलाप चन्द पुत्र श्री प्रशोत्तम दास, ओंकार चन्द, देवी दास, हरबंश लाल, महावीर पुत्रान श्री पूर्ण, सावित्री देवी पत्नी स्व श्री पूर्ण, लारजा पुत्र मोहल्ला, देव राज, प्यारा लाल, मदन लाल, रोशन लाल, राय सिंह, रमेश चन्द पुत्रान श्री मोती पुत्र श्री किरपा, सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

----------

मिसल नं0 12/2015 एन0 टी0 तकसीम तारीख पेशी 25-05-2018 हिमाल चन्द

बनाम मनी राम आदि प्रार्थना-पत्र तकसीम जेर धारा 123 हि0 प्र0 राजस्व अधिनियम बाबत खाता नं0 51, खतौनी नं0 118, 119, खसरा नम्बरान 481, 488, 489, 1006/490, 630, किाा 06, रकबा तादादी 0-71-26 है0 स्थित महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

उपरोक्त तकसीम इस अदालत में दिनांक 24-02-2015 से जेरे समायत है फरीकैन को इस अदालत द्वारा समन जारी किए गए लेकिन प्रत्यार्थीगण नं0 1. श्री मनी राम पुत्र श्री परमा, जौंगा राम पुत्र श्री बंगाली, अशोक कुमार, गुरदीप सिंह, अशवनी कुमार पुत्रान श्री मिल्खी राम, रीतू, रितिका पुत्रियां श्री रमेश चन्द, गिरधारी लाल, राम कृष्ण पुत्रान श्री राजमल, प्रशोत्तम दास, ईश्वर दास पुत्रान श्री चुहडू राम, सागर चन्द, विनोद कुमार, मिलाप चन्द, ओंकार चन्द पुत्रान श्री प्रशोत्तम दास, हरबंश लाल, देवी दास, महावीर पुत्रान श्री पूर्ण, सावित्री देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री पूर्ण, सभी निवासी महाल व मौजा भारथ, तहसील व जिला कांगड़ा (हि0 प्र0) हाजिर अदालत न आए जिससे इस अदालत को पूर्ण विश्वास हो चुका है कि उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थीगण की तामील साधारण तरीके से न हो सकती है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा तामील करवाई जाती है।

आज दिनांक 14-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, कांगड़ा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।1090 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 आम जनता श्री Tenzin Palchok बनाम

विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धारा 13(3) हिमाचल प्रदेश पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।

श्री Tenzin Palchok पुत्र JinpaTashi, निवासी Mcleodganj, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसके पुत्र का नाम Tenzin Palchok का जन्म तिथि 01-11-1974 है परन्तु एम0सी0/ग्राम पंचायत Dharamshala में जन्म पंजीकृत न है। अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें। इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त पुत्र Tenzin Palchok का जन्म पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 25-05-2018 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा मुताबिक शपथ-पत्र जन्म तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 25-04-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा।

-------------

ब अदालत श्री दिवान सिंह नेगी, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, तकलेच,

जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0

नं0 मुकद्दमा : 44/2018

तारीख दायर : 24-03-2018 श्री राजेन्द्र सिंह पुत्र श्री हूमी राम, निवासी अनुराक्षी, डा0 करेरी, उप-तहसील तकलेच, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 . . वादी।

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी। दरख्वास्त (नाम दरुस्ती) माल कागजात वाका चक अनुराक्षी, उप-तहसील तकलेच, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0।

नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।

यह दरख्वास्त श्री राजेन्द्र सिंह पुत्र श्री हूमी राम, निवासी अनुराक्षी, डा0 करेरी, उप-तहसील तकलेच, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 ने इस आशय के साथ प्रस्तुत की है कि वादी तथा वादी के पिता का नाम मुताबिक आधार कार्ड, नकल परिवार रजिस्टर, स्कूल प्रमाण-पत्र व पैन कार्ड में राजेन्द्र सिंह तथा पिता का नाम हुमी राम दर्ज है जो सही व दरुस्त है परन्तु वाका चक अनुराक्षी के माल कागजात के खाना मालिक में वादी तथा वादी के पिता का नाम राजू पुत्र हुमा सरन दर्शाया गया है जो सही नहीं है वादी उपरोक्त माल1091 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 कागज़ात में अपना तथा अपने पिता का नाम राजू पुत्र हुमा सरन के स्थान पर राजेन्द्र सिंह पुत्र हुमी राम दरुस्त व दर्ज करवाना चाहता है।

अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा सर्वसाधारण को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त वादी का नाम माल काग़जात में दरुस्त/दर्ज करने बारे कोई आपाि हो तो दिनांक 19-05-2018 को या इससे पूर्व अदालत हज़ा में हाज़िर आकर अपनी आपाि दर्ज़ करवा सकता है। बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई भी उजर/एतराज काबिले समायत न होगा तथा नियमानुसार वादी का नाम दरुस्त करने के आदेश पारित किये जाएंगे।

आज दिनांक 19-04-2018 को मेरेे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

दिवान सिंह नेगी, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, उप-तहसील तकलेच, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।1092 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 07 मई, 2018/17 वैशाख, 1940 नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है