Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 67, 28 June 2022

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित मंगलवार, 28 जून, 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 16th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-413/2021.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex-post facto sanction of 03 days commuted leave w.e.f. 25-05-2022 to 27-05-2022 in favour of Ms. Geetika Yadav, Civil Judge-cum-JM (II), Una, H.P.

67—राजपत्र/2022-28-06-2022 (2185)2186 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 Certified that Ms. Geetika Yadav had joined the same post and at the same station from where she had proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Geetika Yadav would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge- cum-JM (II), Una, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 16th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-390/2019.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex-post facto sanction of 02 days commuted leave for 17-05-2022 and 18-05-2022 in favour of Ms. Shweta Narula, Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Kangra, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Shweta Narula had joined the same post and at the same station from where she had proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Shweta Narula would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge- cum-JMFC, Kangra, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 17th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-291/2006-I.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 06 days earned leave w.e.f. 20-06-2022 to 25-06-2022 with permission to affix Sundays falling on 19-06-2022 and 26-06-2022 respectively, in favour of Sh. Subhash Chander Bhaseen, Sr. Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Chamba, H.P.

Certified that Sh. Subhash Chander Bhaseen is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Sh. Subhash Chander Bhaseen would have continued to hold the post of Sr. Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Chamba, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 17th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-389/2019.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 06 days earned leave w.e.f. 20-06-2022 to 25-06-2022 with permission to affix Sundays falling on 19-06-2022 and 26-06-2022 respectively, in favour of Sh. Anshul Malik, Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Jubbal, H.P.

Certified that Sh. Anshul Malik is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Sh. Anshul Malik would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge- cum-JMFC, Jubbal, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 20th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-354/2015.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex-post facto sanction of 156 days maternity leave w.e.f. 06-07-2021 to 08-12-2021 in favour of Ms. Kanika Gupta, the then Civil Judge-cum-JMFC (I), Dharamshala presently posted as Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Dehra, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Kanika Gupta had joined the same post and at the same station from where she had proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Kanika Gupta would have continued to hold the same post of Civil Judge-cum-JMFC (I), Dharamshala, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 22nd June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-380/2017.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 06 days earned leave w.e.f. 27-06-2022 to 02-07-2022 with permission to affix Sundays falling on 26-06-2022 & 03-07-2022 respectively, in favour of Ms. Vatsala Chaudhary, Civil Judge-cum- JMFC, Chachiot at Gohar, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Vatsala Chaudhary is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Vatsala Chaudhary would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Chachiot at Gohar, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 22nd June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-342/2014.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 20 days earned leave w.e.f. 11-07-2022 to 30-07-2022 with permission to prefix Special Casual leave, Second Saturday & Sunday falling w.e.f. 26-06-2022 to 08-07-2022, 09-07-2022 & 10-07-2022 respectively and suffix Sunday falling on 31-07-2022, in favour of Ms. Anita Sharma, Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Barsar, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Anita Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Anita Sharma would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge- cum-JMFC, Barsar, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 17th June, 2022

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the powers vested in her under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been pleased to declare Sr. Civil Judge-cum-ACJM (I), Rohru as Drawing and Disbursing Officer in respect of the Court of Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Jubbal and also the Controlling Officer for the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of establishment attached to the aforesaid Court during the earned leave period of Sh. Anshul Malik, Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Jubbal, H.P. w.e.f. 20-06-2022 to 25-06-2022 with permission to affix Sundays falling on 19-06-2022 & 26-06-2022, respectively or till he returns from leave.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 17th June, 2022

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the powers vested in her under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been pleased to declare Civil Judge-cum-JM, Chamba as Drawing and Disbursing Officer in respect of the Court of Sr. Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Chamba and also the Controlling Officer for the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of establishment attached to the aforesaid Court during the earned leave period of Sh. Subhash Chander Bhaseen, Sr. Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 20-06-2022 to 25-06-2022 with permission to affix Sundays falling on 19-06-2022 & 26-06-2022 respectively or till he returns from leave.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 16th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-361/2015.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant sanction of 180 day's maternity leave w.e.f. 6-6-2022 to 2-12-2022 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 5-06-2022 in favour of Ms. Sonal Sharma, Civil Judge-cum-JFMC-IV, Shimla, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Sonal Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Sonal Sharma would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge- cum-JFMC-IV, Shimla, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General. ___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 16th June, 2022

No. HHC/GAZ/14-396/2019.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex-post facto sanction of 02 days'earned leave for 21-10-2021 and 22-10-2021 in favour of Sh. Sumit Thakur, Civil Judge-cum-JMFC, Dalhousie, H.P.

Certified that Sh. Sumit Thakur has joined the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Sh. Sumit Thakur would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge- cum-JMFC, Dalhousie, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General. ___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 16th June, 2022

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVII.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the powers vested in her under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been pleased2191 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 to declare Civil Judge-cum-JMFC-VI, Shimla, H.P. as Drawing and Disbursing Officer, in respect of the Court of Civil Judge-cum-JMFC-IV, Shimla, H.P. and also the Controlling Officer for the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of establishment attached to the aforesaid Court during the maternity leave period of Ms. Sonal Sharma, Civil Judge-cum-JMFC-IV, Shimla w.e.f. 06-06-2022 to 02-12-2022 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 05-06-2022 or till she returns from leave.

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 20th May, 2022

No. Per (AP.B)-B(11)-1/2015.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to make the following Rules of "The Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officer (Annual Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2022", in the Department of Personnel, namely:—

1. Short title, commencement and application.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officer (Annual Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2022.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette), Himachal Pradesh.

2. Definitions.—In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) "accepting authority" means the authority which supervises the performance of the reviewing authority as may be specifically empowered in this behalf by the Government;

(b) "Government" means the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

(c) "annual performance appraisal report" means the performance appraisal report referred to in rules 4 and 5;

(d) "performance appraisal dossier" means the compilation of the performance appraisal reports written on an officer of the Class-I & Class-II officer under the State Government of H.P including Departmental HoD's & HPSS, REFERRED TO IN RULE 3, and includes such other documents as may be specified by the Government, by general or special order, in this behalf;

(e) "referral board" means a board consisting of such officers designated by the Government for cases relating to all officers of the Service on Central deputation, or for officers serving in the State, specified in Schedule-3;

(f) "reporting authority" means such authority or authorities supervising the performance of the member of the Service reported upon as may be specifically empowered in this behalf by the Government;

(g) "reviewing authority" means such authority or authorities supervising the performance of the reporting authority as may be specifically empowered in this behalf by the Government;

(h) "Schedule" means the Schedule annexed to these rules;

(i) "Service" means the service being rendered as Class-I and Class-II officer under the State Government of H.P. including Departmental HoD's & HPSS and excluding officers of AIS, HPAS & HPPS.

3. Maintenance and custody of annual performance appraisal dossier.—A comprehensive performance appraisal dossier shall be maintained for each member of the Service by the Government in the manner specified under these rules and the performance appraisal dossier shall consist of the documents specified in Schedule-1.

4. Form of the annual performance appraisal report.—(1) The reporting authority shall write the performance appraisal report in such form as may be specified by the Government in Schedule-2 and the officer reported upon and the reporting, reviewing and accepting authority shall ensure that the portions of the forms which are to be filled in by them are completed by them within the time limit specified in this behalf by the Government:

Provided that the Government may make such additions in the form or the cut-off dates so specified as may be considered necessary or desirable :

Provided further that the annual performance appraisal report shall also be written in such form as may be specified in this behalf by the Government for the members of the Service on deputation :

Provided also that the annual performance appraisal report shall also be written for members of Service who are on training or study leave in such form as may be specified in this behalf by the Government.

5. Performance appraisal reports.—(1) An annual performance appraisal report assessing the performance, character, conduct and qualities of every member of the Service shall be written for each financial year or as may be specified by the Government in the Schedule-2 :

Provided that an annual performance appraisal report may not be written in such cases as may be specified by the Government, by general or special order :

Provided further that if a performance appraisal report for a financial year is not recorded by 31st of December of the year in which the financial year ended, no remarks may be recorded thereafter and the officer may be assessed on the basis of the overall record and self assessment for the year, if he has submitted his self-assessment on time.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4), a performance appraisal report shall also be written when either the reporting or reviewing authority or the member of the Service reported upon relinquishes charge of the post, and, in such a case, it shall be written at the time of the relinquishment or ordinarily within one month of such relinquishment.

(3) Where more than one performance appraisal reports are written on a member of the Service during the course of a financial year each such report shall indicate the period to which it pertains :

Provided that only one report shall be written on a member of the Service for a particular period during the course of the financial year and there shall be reporting, reviewing and accepting authority at each level of assessment which shall be specified in the channel for writing annual performance appraisal reports by the Government.

(4) Where the reporting authority has not seen, but the reviewing authority has seen the performance of a member of the Service for at least three months during the period for which the annual performance appraisal report is to be written the reviewing authority shall write the performance appraisal report of any such member for any such period.

(5) Where, both the reporting authority and the reviewing authority have not seen and the accepting authority has seen, as referred to in sub-rule (4), the performance of any such member, the accepting authority shall write the performance appraisal of any such member during such period.

(6) Where the reporting authority, the reviewing authority and the accepting authority have not seen the performance of a member of the Service for at least three months during the period for which the report is to be written, the Government shall make an entry to that effect in the annual performance appraisal report for any such period.

(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rules (1), (2), (4) and (5), it shall not be competent for the reporting authority, the reviewing authority or the accepting authority to write an annual performance appraisal report after he demits office where the authority writing the performance appraisal report is not a Government servant.

Explanation:—For the purposes of this rule, "a Minister" shall not be construed as having demitted the office if he continues to be a Minister in the Council of Ministers with a different portfolio or in the Council of Ministers immediately reconstituted after the previous Council of Ministers of which he was a Minister with the same or a different portfolio provided the Chief Minister continues in office.

6. Review of the performance appraisal report.—(1) The reviewing authority shall record his remarks on the annual performance appraisal report, within the timeframe specified in the Schedule-2.

(2) Where the report is written by the reviewing authority under sub-rule (4) of rule 5, or where the reviewing authority has not seen, and the accepting authority has seen, the performance of a member of the Service for at least three months during the period for which the annual performance appraisal report is written, the accepting authority shall review the annual performance appraisal report of any such member for any such period within the timeframe specified in the Schedule-2.

(3) It shall not be competent for the reviewing authority, or the accepting authority, to review any such performance appraisal report unless it has seen the performance of the member of the Service for at least three months during the period for which the report has been written, and in every such case an entry to that effect shall be made in the annual performance appraisal report.

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rules (1) and (2), it shall not be competent for the reviewing authority or the accepting authority to review any such performance appraisal report.—

(a) Where the authority reviewing the annual performance appraisal report is a Government servant, after one month of his retirement from service; and

(b) In other cases, after one month of the date on which he demits office.

Explanation:—For the purposes of this rule, "a Minister" shall not be construed as having demitted the office if he continues to be a Minister in the Council of Ministers with a different portfolio or in the Council of Ministers immediately reconstituted after the previous Council of Ministers of which he was a Minister with the same or a different portfolio provided the Chief Minister continues in office.

7. Acceptance of the Annual Performance Appraisal Report.—(1) The accepting authority shall, within the timeframe specified in Schedule-2, record his remarks on the annual performance appraisal report and may accept it, with such modifications as may be considered necessary, and countersign the report:

Provided that where the accepting authority has not seen the performance of any member of the Service for at least three months during the period for which the performance appraisal report has been written, it shall not be necessary for the accepting authority to accept any such report and an entry to this effect shall be made in the performance appraisal report.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), it shall not be competent for the accepting authority to accept and countersign any such performance report:—

(a) where the accepting authority is a Government servant, after one month of his retirement from service; and

(b) in other cases, one month after the date on which he demits the office.

(3) When the performance appraisal report be not written or revised.—Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5 or rule 6, where the accepting authority writes or reviews the performance appraisal report of any member of the Service, it shall not be necessary to review or accept any such report.

8. Communication of the annual performance appraisal report to the Government.—A certified true copy of the annual performance appraisal report shall be sent to the Government in case of a member of the service working on secondment/deputation basis outside the cadre and the APAR is recorded manually and not electronically :

Provided that if the performance appraisal report is written in a language other than Hindi or English, it shall be accompanied by an authentic certified translation in Hindi or English.

9. Disclosure of performance appraisal report to the officer reported upon and procedure for representation to the Referral Board.—(1) The full annual performance appraisal report, including the overall grade and assessment of integrity, shall be disclosed to the officer reported upon after finalisation by the accepting authority to enable the officer reported upon to represent his case.

(2) The officer reported upon may have the option to give his comments on the annual performance appraisal report in writing to the accepting authority within fifteen days of the receipt of the Annual Performance Appraisal Report.

(3) The comments shall be restricted to the specific factual observations contained in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report leading to the assessment of the officer in terms of attributes, work output and competency.

(4) The accepting authority shall within fifteen days of receipt of comments from the officer reported upon forward the same to the reviewing and the reporting authority and call for their views on the comments.

(5) The reporting authority shall, within fifteen days of receipt of comments from the officer reported upon forward his own views on the comments to the reviewing authority failing which it shall be presumed that he has no views thereon.

(6) The reviewing authority shall forward the comments of the officer reported upon along with the views of the reporting authority and his own views to the accepting authority within fifteen days of receipt of the views of the reporting authority.

(7) The accepting authority shall consider the comments of the officer reported upon, the views of the reporting authority and the reviewing authority and after due consideration may accept them and modify the performance appraisal report accordingly and the decision and final grading shall be communicated to the officer reported upon within fifteen days of receipt of the views of the reviewing authority.

(8)(a) In case the officer reported upon chooses to represent against the final assessment conveyed to him according to this procedure, he may represent his case through the accepting authority for a decision by the Referral Board, as specified in the Schedule-3, within one month:

provided that such representation shall be confined to errors of facts.

(b) The representation of the officer reported upon along with the views of the reporting authority, the reviewing authority and the accepting authority shall be forwarded to the Referral Board on the request of the officer reported upon within a period of fifteen days of receipt of communication.

(9)(a) The Referral Board shall consider the representation of the officer reported upon in the light of the comments of the reporting authority, the reviewing authority and the accepting authority and confirm or modify the performance appraisal report, including the overall grade and the decision of the Referral Board shall be confined only to errors of facts and the decision of the Referral Board shall be final.

(b) In case an entry or assessment is upgraded or downgraded, reasons for the same shall be recorded in the annual performance appraisal report.

(c) The entire performance appraisal report, including the overall grade, shall thereafter be communicated to the officer reported upon which shall conclude the process of assessment and no further representation of any kind shall be entertained thereafter.

10. Memorial against assessment.—Nothing in these rules shall be deemed to preclude an officer from making a memorial to the Governor on the Annual Performance Appraisal Report, as provided under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

11. General.—The Government may issue instructions, not inconsistent with the provisions of these rules, or as it may consider necessary, with regard to the writing of the annual performance appraisal reports, the maintenance of the performance appraisal dossier and the effect of the annual performance appraisal reports on the conditions of service of a member of the Service.

By order,

PRABODH SAXENA, Additional Chief Secretary (Personnel).

____________

SCHEDULE—1

(See rule 3)

Documents to be maintained in the Performance Appraisal Dossier:

(i) The performance appraisal reports earned throughout the career.

(ii) Certificates of training, academic courses attended after joining service, study leave (iii) Details of books, articles and other publications.

(iv) Appreciation letters from Government or Secretary or Head of Department or special bodies or Commissions.

(v) Reports of medical check-up.

(vi) Copy of order imposing any of the penalties specified in the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 19695 and final result of inquiry into allegations and charges against a member of the Service.

(vii) Warnings or displeasure or reprimands of the Government

____________

SCHEDULE—2

(See rule 4)

Performance Appraisal Report Forms and summary of medical report for the

Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers:

• Form I and general guidelines for filling up the Annual Performance Appraisal Report form

• Form II for the Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers are on deputation outside the State.

• Form III Performance Report on study leave or leave for study for the Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers.

• Form III B Performance report on training.

Timelines for completion of APARs.

Reporting year-Financial year

SCHEDULE—3

[See rule 2 (e)]

Composition of the Referral Board for the Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers

(i) Chief Secretary of the State - Chairperson

(ii) Senior most Secretary in the State - Member

(iii) Administrative Secretary (Personnel) - Convener2198 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 "FORM-IV" (See rule 3)

The Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers (Annual Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2022.

PROFORMA FOR HEALTH CHECK UP

Name:_________________________________Age:________Sex: M/F _____

Brief clinical history, if any:

(A) Physical

Investigations:

(1) Haemogram

(i) Hb% (ii) TKC (iii) DKC

(a) Polymorphs (b) Lymphocytes (c) Eosinophils (d) Basophils (e) Monocytes

(iv) Peripheral Smear

(2) Blood Sugar

(i) Fasting

(ii) Post-Prandial

(3) Lipid Profile

(i) Total Cholesterol

(ii) HDL Cholesterol

(iii) LDL Cholesterol

(iv) VLDL Cholesterol

(v) Triglyceride

(4) Liver Function Test

(i) S. Bilirubin (Total)

(ii) S. Bilirubin (Direct)2199 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944

FORM—I

(See rule 4)

The Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers (APAR) Rules, 2022

Report for the year/period from..................to.............. Department/ Office of......................

Section I - Basic Information: (To be filled in by the Department)

l. Name of the officer reported upon:

2. Date of birth:

4. Present post:

5. Date of appointment to the present post:

6. Reporting, Reviewing and Accepting Authorities

Name & Designation Period worked Reporting Authority Reviewing Authority Accepting Authority

7. Period of absence on leave, etc.

Period Type Remarks On leave (specify type) Others (specify)

8. Training programmes attended

Date from Date to Institute Subject

9. Awards/ Honours

10. Details of APARS of HPSSS and other Class-I and Class-II officers not written by the officer as Reporting/Reviewing/Accepting Authority for the previous year (s)…………………..……….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………

11. Date of filing the annual property return for the year ending December:

Date: Signature on behalf of Administrator2200 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944

Reporting officer Reviewing

officer

Initial of Reviewing officer

(i) Accomplishment of

planned work

(ii) Quality of output (iii) Accomplishment of exceptional work, unforeseen tasks during the period

Overall grading on work output

3. Integrity

Please comment on the integrity of the officer keeping in mind both the financial integrity and moral integrity

4. Pen picture by the Reporting Authority Please comment (in about 100 words) on the overall qualities of the officer including areas of strengths and lesser strengths and his attitude towards weaker sections.

5. Overall Grade on a scale of 1-10

Date: Signature of Reporting Authority2202 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944

Section—IV

Review

1. Do you agree with the assessment made by the reporting officer with respect to the work output and the various attributes in Section III? Do you agree with the assessment of the reporting officer in respect of extraordinary achievements and/or significant failures of the officer reported upon? (In case you do not agree with any of the numerical assessments of attributes, please record your assessment in the column provided for you in that section and initial your entries) Yes No

2. In case of difference of opinion details and reasons for the same may be given

3. Please comment (in about 100 words) on the overall qualities of the officer including areas of strengths and lesser strengths and his/her attitude towards weaker sections :

4. Overall Grade on a scale of 1-10

Date: Signature of Reviewing Authority

Section—V

Acceptance

Yes No 1. Do you agree with the remarks of the reporting/ reviewing authority

2. In case of difference of opinion details and reasons for the same may be given

3. Overall Grade on a scale of 1-10

Date: Signature of Accepting Authority2203 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944

FORM—II

(See rule 4)

The Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers (Annual Performance Appraisal)

Rules, 2022

(Applicable for the Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers who are on deputation/ secondment)

Annual Performance Appraisal Report for the period from _________to __________ Section I - Basic Information: (To be filled in by the Department of Personnel)

l. Name of the officer reported upon:

2.Year of allotment:

3. Date of birth:

4.Present Grade: 5. Present post:

5.Date of appointment to the present post:

6.Reporting, Reviewing and Accepting Authorities

7. Period of absence on leave, etc.

9. Awards/ Honours2204 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 10. Details of the Himachal Pradesh Secretariat Services and other officers not written by the officer as Reporting/ Reviewing/ Accepting Authority for the previous year (s)………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… …………………………………….………………………………………………………………… …………………………..........................................................

11. Date of filing the annual property return for the year ending December:

12. Date of the last prescribed medical examination (for officers over 40 years of age) Attach copy of the summary of the medical report

Date: Signature on behalf of Administrator/Personnel Department

_____________

Section—II

Self Appraisal

1. Brief description of duties:

(Objectives of the position you hold and the tasks you are required to perform in about 100 words) Date:

Signature of the Officer Reported upon 2. Annual work plan and achievement

3. During the period under report, do you believe that you have made any exceptional contribution? If so, please give a verbal description (within 100 words)

4. Declaration

Date:

Signature of the

Officer Reported upon

_____________

Section—III

Appraisal

1. Assessment of Attributes (This assessment should rate the officer vis-à-vis the peers and not the general population. Grades should be assigned on a scale of 1-10 in whole numbers with 1 referring to the lowest grade and 10 to the best grade. 70% weightage will be assigned to this item).

2. Assessment of work output (This assessment should rate the officer vis-à-vis the peers and not the general population. Grades should be assigned on a scale of 1-10 in whole numbers with 1 referring to the lowest grade and 10 to the best grade. 30% weightage will be assigned to this item).

3. Integrity

Please comment on the integrity of the officer keeping in mind both the financial integrity and moral integrity

4. Pen picture by the Reporting Authority

Please comment (in about 100 words) on the overall qualities of the officer including areas of strengths and lesser strengths and his attitude towards weaker sections2207 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 5. Overall Grade on a scale of 1-10

Date: Signature of Reporting Authority

___________

Section—IV

Review

1. Do you agree with the assessment made by the reporting officer with respect to the work output and the various attributes in Section III? Do you agree with the assessment of the reporting officer in respect of extraordinary achievements and/ or significant failures of the officer reported upon?

(In case you do not agree with any of the numerical assessments of attributes, please record your assessment in the column provided for you in that section and initial your entries)

2. In case of difference of opinion details and reasons for the same may be given

3. Comments, if any, on the pen picture written by the Reporting Authority2208 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 3. A Comments, if any, on the pen picture written by the Reporting Authority

4. Overall Grade on a scale of 1-10

Date: Signature of Reviewing Authority ____________

Section—V

Acceptance

1. Do you agree with the remarks of the reporting/ reviewing authority

2. In case of difference of opinion details and reasons for the same may be given

3. Overall Grade on a scale of 1-10

Date: Signature of Accepting Authority FORM—III A (See rule 4)

The Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officer (Annual Performance Appraisal)

Rules, 2022

PERFORMANCE REPORT ON STUDY LEAVE/ LEAVE FOR STUDY2209 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 Annual Performance Appraisal Report for the period from _________to _________

A. Personal data

l. Name of the officer reported upon:

2. Year of allotment:

3. Date of birth:

4. Present Grade: 5. Present post:

5. Date of appointment to the present post:

6. Study leave/ leave details

(a) Course

(b) Institution

(c) Duration

7. Period of sanctioned leave

8. Details of Degree/Certificate/Diploma and evaluation obtained during the period (copies to be enclosed).

9. Date of filing Annual Property Return

B. SELF ASSESSMENT

Signature of the Date :

Officer Reported upon

FORM—III B

(See rule 4)

The Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officer (Annual

Performance Appraisal) Rules, 2022

Performance report on training

Annual Performance Appraisal Report for the period from _________to _________2210 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 A. PERSONAL DATA

l. Name of the officer reported upon:

2. Year of allotment:

3. Date of birth:

4. Present Grade: 5. Present post:

5. Date of appointment to the present post:

6. Training details

(a) Course

(b) Institution

(c) Duration

7. Details of Degree/ Certificate/ Diploma and evaluation obtained during the period (copies to be enclosed).

8. Date of filing Annual Property Return

B. SELF ASSESSMENT :

Signature of the Date :

Officer Reported upon General guidelines for filling up the APAR form for the Himachal Pradesh Class-I and Class-II Officers.

1.1 The Annual Performance Appraisal Report is a vital tool for assessment and career advancement of an officer. It provides the basic, relevant and significant input for further development of an officer. The officer reported upon, the Reporting Authority, Reviewing Authority and Accepting Authority should therefore, fill up the form with a high sense of responsibility, impartiality and objectivity.

1.2 Performance appraisal should be used as a tool for career planning and training, rather than a mere judgmental exercise. Reporting Authorities should realize that the objective is to develop an officer so that he/she realizes his/her true potential. It is not meant to be a fault- finding process but a developmental tool. The Reporting Authority, the Reviewing Authority and the Accepting Authority should not shy away from reporting shortcomings in performance, attitudes or overall personality of the officer reported upon.

1.3 The columns should be filled with due care and attention and after devoting adequate time. Any attempt to fill the report in a casual or superficial manner will be easily discernible to the higher authorities.

1.4 Although the actual documentation of performance appraisal is a year-end exercise, in order that it may be a tool for human resource development, career planning and training, rather than a mere judgmental exercise, the Reporting Authority and the officer reported upon should meet during the course of the year at regular intervals to review the performance and to take necessary corrective steps.

2. Section-I 2.1 This Section should be filled up in the Confidential Cell in the Department of Personnel. Period of report could either be the entire reporting year, namely, from 1stof April to 31st March or a part of the year (exceeding 3 months). In case the period of report is a full year, it should be indicated accordingly; for example, 2018-2019. In case the period of report is less than the entire year, specific start and end dates should be indicated, for example, 13th October 2018 – 31stMarch 2019.

2.2 Information on the present grade (pay-scale) as well as present post (actual designation and organization) and the date from which he/she has been on his/her present post needs to be mentioned.

2.3 In the table relating to reporting, reviewing and accepting authorities, the name and designation of the reporting and reviewing authorities should be mentioned so that the officer reported upon is clear about whom he/she is required to send the report.

2.4 The period of absence from duty, on leave, training, or for other reasons, should also be mentioned in this section in the table provided for the purpose. Details of the training programmes attended, date of filing of property returns and whether the officer reported upon has reported/reviewed the annual performance report of all his/her subordinate officers for the previous year should be mentioned in the table for the purpose.

2.5 This Section provides for regular annual medical examination. The health check is mandatory for all officers above the age of 40 and may be totally dispensed with for officers below the age of 40, except in case of medical incident. A copy of the summary of the medical report is to be attached to the APAR Form by the Administrator/Department of Personnel. The format of the health check-up and the summary of medical report will be as circulated by the Personnel.

3. Section-II 3.1 The officer reported upon is first required to give brief description of his/her duties and responsibilities, which would normally not exceed about 100 words. Ideally, this should be in bullet form.

3.2 All officers are required to develop a work plan for the year and agree upon the same with the reporting officer. The work plan should incorporate the relative annual work rhythm and budgetary cycle. This exercise is to be carried out at the beginning of the year and finalized by 30th April, positively. In case of a change of the reporting officer during the year, the2212 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 work plan agreed with the previous reporting officer would continue to apply. The work plan agreed upon at the beginning of the year has to be reviewed again during the month of September/October as a mid-year exercise and finalized by 31st October. Based on this review the work plan may undergo some changes from that originally prepared.

3.3 After the work plan is prepared, it is possible that the officer reported upon is transferred out. There need not be more than one work plan for one post each year. The period spent by the officer during the year and his contribution could be considered for evaluating his performance against the work plan. In the case of mid-term transfers, continuity and assessment of work and the lower performance profile in the first quarter should be taken into consideration.

3.4 The work plans, duly signed by the officer reported upon and the reporting authority have to be submitted to the reviewing authority for his/her perusal and custody. The annual performance appraisal form provides for an assessment of the accomplishments vis-à-vis the work plan agreed at the commencement of the year and reviewed mid- year. The officer reported upon is required to fill up the table provided for the purpose in Section-II.

3.5 It is not necessary that the work plan should be entirely quantitative in nature. While for field level posts, the work plan would consist essentially of quantifiable targets, for secretarial level posts it would consist of policy objectives to be achieved etc.

3.6 Section II also provides an opportunity for the officer to reflect upon his/her performance during the year and indicate one item which he/she thought was a significant contribution made by him/her during the year. It is always possible for any officer to make significant contribution even in activities otherwise regarded as routine in nature. Examples of such contribution may be the successful organization of a major event or successful conclusion of an activity that has been going on for a long time, or even successful dealing of an emergency (e.g. major earth quake/flood) would certainly be an exceptional contribution.

3.7 The officer reported upon is required to indicate specific areas in which he/she feels the need to upgrade skills and attend training programs. He/she should also mention the specific steps that he/she has taken or proposes to take to upgrade his/her skills in the identified area.

3.8 There is an increased emphasis on competency building in the new performance appraisal and career progression system. There would be a premium on competency and skill upgradation. Hence, all officers are advised, through a note in Section II, to keep the Department of Personnel informed, at least once in five years, of all educational and training programs attended, including the details of marks/grades secured in such programs, details of professional papers published. These would be taken into account in the future career progression.

3.9 This Section also requires the officer reported upon to record certain certificates about submission of property returns, annual medical check up and setting up of annual work plan for whom he/she would be the reporting authority.

4. Section-III 4.1 Section III requires the reporting authority to comment on Section II as filled out by the officer reported upon and specifically state whether he/she agrees with the responses relating to the accomplishments. In case of disagreement the reporting authority2213 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 should highlight the specific portions with which he/she is unable to agree and the reasons for such disagreement.

4.2 This Section then requires the reporting authority to comment on the skill upgradation needs as identified by the officer.

4.3 Thereafter, this Section requires the reporting authority to record a numerical grade in respect of the workout put of the officer reported upon both in respect of the planned work as well as the unforeseen tasks. A numerical grade is also required in respect of the "quality" of the output. In doing so, the reporting authority should take into account the costs incurred (whether the officer reported upon has been cost conscious), the time taken and whether the laid down rules/procedures have been adhered to in accomplishing the tasks.

4.4 The reporting authority is also required to record a numerical grade in respect of work output, personal attributes and functional competencies.

4.5 Section III requires the reporting authority to comment on the integrity of the officer reported upon. In recording remarks with regard to integrity, he/she need not limit him/herself only to matters relating to financial integrity but could also take into account the moral and intellectual integrity of the officer reported upon. The following procedure should be followed in filling up the column relating to integrity: (i) If the Officer's integrity is beyond doubt, it may be stated. (ii) If there is any doubt or suspicion, the column should be left blank and action taken as under:

(a) A separate secret note should be recorded and followed up. A copy of the note should also be sent together with the Annual Performance Appraisal Report to the next superior officer who will ensure that the follow up action is taken expeditiously. Where it is not possible either to certify the integrity or to record the secret note, the Reporting Officer should state either that he/she had not watched the officer's work for sufficient time to form a definite judgement or that he/she has heard nothing against the officer, as the case may be.

(b) If, as a result of the follow up action, the doubts or suspicions are cleared, the officer's integrity should be certified and an entry made accordingly in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report.

(c) If the doubts or suspicions are confirmed, this fact should also be recorded and duly communicated to the officer concerned.

(d) If as a result of the follow up action, the doubts or suspicions are neither cleared nor confirmed, the officers conduct should be watched for a further period and thereafter action taken as indicated at (b) and (c) above.

4.6 The reporting authority is also required to record a descriptive pen-picture on the overall qualities of the officer reported upon and his/her performance including his attitude towards weaker sections. This need not exceed about 50 words and should try to cover overall qualities of the officer including areas of strengths and lesser strengths. The penpicture is also meant to be a qualitative supplement to the quantitative assessments made earlier part of this section.

assignment. The list of domains is at para 10.

4.8 Finally, the reporting authority is required to record an overall grade. This should also be done on a scale of 1- 10, with 1 referring to the lowest grade and 10 to the highest.

5. Section-IV 5.1 This Section is to be filled up by the reviewing authority. He/she is required to indicate if he/she agrees with the assessments made by the reporting officer. In case of disagreement, he/she may record his/her own assessment against the work output or any of the attributes in the column specifically provided for the purpose. In case of agreement, he/she need not fill in the column meant for him/her in the attributes/work output tables. Finally, the reviewing authority is required to record an overall grade in the scale of 1-10.

6. Section-V 6.1 This Section is to be filled by the accepting authority. He/she is required to indicate if he/she agrees with the assessments made by the reporting authority/reviewing authorities. In case of difference of opinion, he/she is required to give details and reasons for the same in the column specifically provided for the purpose in the table in Section V. 7. Numerical Grades 7.1 At several places, numerical grades are to be awarded by reporting and review authorities. These should be on a scale of 1-10, where 1 refers to the lowest grade and 10 to the highest. It is expected that any grading of 1 or 2 (against work output or attributes or overall grade) would be adequately justified in the pen-picture by way of specific failures and similarly, any grade of 9 or 10 would be justified with respect to specific accomplishments. Grades of 1-2 or 9-10 are expected to be rare occurrences and hence the need to justify them. In awarding a numerical grade the reporting, reviewing and accepting authorities should rate the officer against a larger population of his/her peers that may be currently working under them or would have worked under them in the past.

7.2 Weightage and Mean Weights have been assigned to work output, personal attributes and functional competency. The overall grade will be based on the addition of the mean value of each group of indicators in proportion to weightage assigned.

8. Disclosure 8.1 There should be more openness in the system of appraisal. The annual PAR, including the overall grade and integrity, should be communicated to the officer reported upon after it has been finalized by the accepting authority.

8.2. Representation The officer reported upon may have the option to give his comments on the APAR. Such comments may be restricted to the specific factual observations contained in the Annual Performance Appraisal Report leading to the assessment of the officer in terms of attributes, competency and output.

If comments are submitted, the Reporting/Reviewing/Accepting Authority would have the option to accept them and modify the PAR accordingly.

If the comments are not accepted, the views of the Reporting/Reviewing/Accepting Authority would be communicated with reasons to the officer reported upon.

Thereafter, only if the officer reported upon so desires, he may request for the matter to be forwarded to the Referral Board. The representation shall be confined to errors of facts and nothing else.

The Referral Board shall give clear findings on the representation and take a final decision on the assessment, including the overall grading in regard to the parameters affected thereby. The decision along with details in case an entry is upgraded or downgraded with,2215 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 reasons for same may be recorded in the APAR and the same communicated to the officer reported upon. The decision of the Referral Board shall be final.

9. Schedule for completion of APARs of Class-I and Class-II Officers.

9.1 The following schedule should be strictly followed:

Reporting year-Financial year

9.2 The completed APAR should reach the Cadre Controlling Authorities after completion of final process as per schedule specified in para 9.1 above. The Cadre Controlling Authority will prepare a list of APARs not received and follow up with the Nodal Officer of the Administrative Departments.

9.3 The Administrative Departments shall designate Nodal officers to ensure that the APARs of the members of Service, duly completed, are sent to the Department of Personnel after completion of the final process as per schedule specified in para 9.1 above. They shall send a list each Class-I & Class-II officer, including Departmental HoD's & HPSS, as the case2216 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 may be, whose APARs are to be written and reviewed to the concerned Reporting/ Reviewing/Accepting Authorities by 15th April every year to enable them to ensure completion of APARs within the time-schedule.

9.4. If an APAR relating to a financial year is not recorded by the 31st of December of the year in which the financial year ended, no remarks shall be recorded thereafter. The HPAS officer will be assessed based on the overall record and self-assessment of the year concerned, if he had given his self-assessment in time and the Reporting Authority, Reviewing Authority and the Accepting Authority have not completed the APAR according to the time schedule given in para 9.1.

9.5. The nodal officer shall also keep a note of the failure of the Reporting Authority to submit the PAR of his subordinate in time for an appropriate entry in the PAR of such Reporting Authorities.

9.8. The Nodal Officer shall evolve a suitable mechanism to ensure that the remarks of the Reporting, the Reviewing and the Accepting Authorities are recorded without fail by the dates given in the schedule below Para 9.1.

__________

ब अदालत उप-मण्डल दण्डाधिकारी सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0)

तारीख पेशी : 03-07-2022 ब मुकद्दमा श्री अभिनव शर्मा पुत्र श्री कमलेन्द्र शर्मा, निवासी मकान नं0 206 रौड़ा सैक्टर-II, वार्ड नं0 04, बिलासपुर, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0)

व

नेहा शर्मा पुत्री श्री रतन लाल, निवासी गांव समलेटा, डा0 रिषिकेश, तहसील झण्डूता, जिला बिलासपुर . . प्रार्थीगण। (हि0प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.-प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये विवाह पंजीकरण करवाने बारे।

नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।

उपरोक्त मुकद्दमा उनवान वाला में प्रार्थी श्री अभिनव शर्मा पुत्र श्री कमलेन्द्र शर्मा, निवासी मकान नं0 206 रौड़ा सैक्टर-II, वार्ड नं0 04, बिलासपुर, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) ने इस अदालत में संयुक्त तौर पर प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है जिसके अनुसार उसने व्यक्त किया है कि श्रीमती नेहा शर्मा पुत्री श्री रतन लाल, निवासी गांव समलेटा, डा0 रिषिकेश, तहसील झण्डूता, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) के साथ दिनांक 23-01-2022 को व्यवस्थित विवाह हिन्दू रीति रिवाजों के अनुसार किया है तथा इसकी प्रविष्टि समयबद्ध नगर परिषद्‌ बिलासपुर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0 प्र0) के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं है अतः विलम्बित अवधि को मर्जित करके उक्त विवाह की प्रविष्टि हेतु कार्यकारी अधिकारी, नगर परिषद्‌ बिलासपुर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) को निर्देश दिये जावें।2217 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 अतः आम जनता को इस नोटिस द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त प्रार्थीगण के विवाह की प्रविष्टि दिनांक 23-01-2022 को दर्ज करने बारा कोई एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 03-07-2022 को सुबह 11.30 बजे असालतन या वकालतन इस कार्यालय में उपस्थित होवें। अन्यथा श्री अभिनव शर्मा पुत्र श्री कमलेन्द्र शर्मा, निवासी मकान नं0 206 रौड़ा सैक्टर-II, वार्ड नं0 04, बिलासपुर, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) व नेहा शर्मा पुत्री श्री रतन लाल, निवासी गांव समलेटा, डा0 रिषिकेश, तहसील झण्डूता, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) के विवाह की प्रविष्टि करने हेतु नगर परिषद्‌ बिलासपुर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) को आदेश जारी कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 03-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ है।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

उप-मण्डल दण्डाधिकारी,

सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0 प्र0)।

-------

ब अदालत जनाब उप-मण्डल दण्डाधिकारी सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0)

तारीख पेशी : 03-07-2022 ब मुकद्दमा अर्पणा पुत्री श्री रोशन चन्द, निवासी गांव व डा0 देवली, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर . . प्रार्थिया। (हि0प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय .-प्रार्थना-पत्र जन्म एवं मृत्यु रजिस्ट्रीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत जन्म तिथि दर्ज करने बारा। नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।

उपरोक्त मुकद्दमा उनवान वाला में प्रार्थिया अर्पणा पुत्री श्री रोशन चन्द, निवासी गांव व डा0 देवली, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र दिया है कि उसकी जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत देवली के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं है उसकी जन्म तिथि 29-03-1971 हैै। इसे दर्ज करने के आदेश किये जायें।

अतः आम जनता को इस नोटिस द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त प्रार्थिया अर्पणा पुत्री श्री रोशन चन्द, निवासी गांव व डा0 देवली, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) की जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत देवली के रिकार्ड में दर्ज करने बारा कोई एतराज हो वह 03-07-2022 को सुबह 11.30 बजे असालतन या वकालतन इस कार्यालय में उपस्थित होवें। अन्यथा अर्पणा पुत्री श्री रोशन चन्द, निवासी गांव व डा0 देवली, तहसील सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0प्र0) की जन्म तिथि सम्बन्धित ग्राम पंचायत देवली, जिला बिलासपुर, हिमाचल प्रदेश के रिकार्ड में दर्ज करने के आदेश जारी कर दिये जायेंगे। आज दिनांक 03-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

उप-मण्डल दण्डाधिकारी,

सदर, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0 प्र0)।2218 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 ब अदालत श्री राज कुमार, उप-मण्डल अधिकारी (नागरिक), श्री नैना देवी जी स्थित स्वारघाट, जिला बिलासपुर, हिमाचल प्रदेश

श्री रमेश कुमार पुत्र श्री भाग सिंह, निवासी गांव गलुआ, डाकघर नकराणा, ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली, तहसील श्री नैना देवी जी, जिला बिलासपुर, हिमाचल प्रदेश।

बनाम

1. आम जनता, 2. प्रधान, ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली, तहसील श्री नैना देवी जी स्थित स्वारघाट, जिला बिलासपुर विषय.--प्रार्थी की पुत्री का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली के जन्म पंजीकरण रजिस्टर में दर्ज करवाए जाने बारे कि अधीन धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत जन्म पंजीकरण करने बारे।

हर खास व आम जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी श्री रमेश कुमार का अधोहस्ताक्षरी के न्यायालय में मुख्य चिकित्सा अधिकारी बिलासपुर के माध्यम से आवेदन-पत्र प्राप्त हुआ है कि उसने अपनी बेटी का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली के जन्म पंजीकरण रजिस्टर में दर्ज नहीं करवाया है। अब प्रार्थी अपनी बेटी का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली के जन्म पंजीकरण रजिस्टर में दर्ज करवाना चाहता है जो कि निम्न प्रकार से हैः--

अतः ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली, तहसील श्री नैना देवी जी स्थित स्वारघाट की जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त जन्म पंजीकरण बारे कोई आपत्ति हो तो वह तारीख 09-07-2022 को या इससे पूर्व असालतन व वकालतन हाजिर अदालत आकर अपनी आपत्ति प्रस्तुत करे अन्यथा आवेदन-पत्र पर जन्म पंजीकरण आदेश पारित करके सचिव, ग्राम पंचायत मंडयाली को आगामी कार्यान्वयन हेतु भेज दिया जाएगा।

आज तारीख 09-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी किया गया। मोहर।

राज कुमार (हि0प्र0से0), उप-मण्डल अधिकारी (नागरिक), श्री नैना देवी जी स्थित स्वारघाट, जिला बिलासपुर (हि0 प्र0)।

----------

In the Court of Sh. Rajiv Thakur Collector, Sub-Division Ghumarwin,

District Bilaspur (H.P.)

Case No. 29/2 of 2022/ Mutation Appeal

Jai Dei d/o Sh. Mahant Ram, r/o Village Bhatoli, Pargna Sariun, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.) . . Applicant.

1. Neelm Devi w/o Sh. Pyar Singh s/o Sh. Krishan Ram, r/o V.P.O. Malywar, Pargana Sariun, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.), 2. Parvati Devi w/o Late Sh. Mahant Ram, V.P.O. Malywar, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.), 3. Satya Devi d/o Late Sh. Mahant Ram w/o Sh. Dalel Singh, r/o V.P.O. Rohin, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.), 4. Shashi Pal s/o Late Smt. Ganga Devi and Late Sh. Garja Ram r/o V.P.O. Rohin, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.), 5. Nisha Devi d/o Late Smt. Ganga Devi and Late Sh. Garja Ram, r/o V.P.O. Rohin, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.) ..Respondents.

Application u/s 14 of H.P. Land revenue Act, 1954. Against the order of A.C. 2nd Grade Ghumarwin dated 23-04-2021 whereby he has attested mutation No. 286 of Village Balh Churani in favour of respondent No. 1 behind the back of appellant and performa respondents.

Notice to the respondents :-

Wheres in the above noted case it has been proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the respondents No. 4 resident of Village Rohin, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.) cannot be served in an ordinary way. Hence this proclamation notice is hereby issued against them to appear in this court on 04-07-2022 at 2.00 P.M. to defend the case personally or through pleader failing which ex-parte proceedings willl be taken against them.

Given under my hand and the seal of this court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Collector,

Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.).

________

ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, तहसील लाहौल, जिला लाहौल एवं स्पिति (हि0प्र0)

छेतन पालमो पत्नी श्री टशी लाज्ञाल, गांव दारचा दंगमा, डाकघर दारचा सूमदो, तहसील लाहौल, जिला लाहौल एवं स्पिति (हि0 प्र0)।

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराए राजस्व अभिलेख में नाम दुरुस्ती करने बारे।

छेतन पालमो पत्नी श्री टशी लाज्ञाल, गांव दारचा दंगमा, डाकघर दारचा सूमदो, तहसील लाहौल, जिला लाहौल एवं स्पिति (हि0 प्र0) ने एक आवेदन-पत्र शपथ पत्र सहित (बराए नाम दुरुस्ती) इस अदालत में प्रस्तुत किया है जिसमें उल्लेख किया है कि उनके पति का नाम आधार कार्ड तथा परिवार रजिस्टर नकल व पैंशन के कागजात में टशी लाज्ञाल दर्ज है जोकि सही है लेकिन पटवार वृत्त दारचा सूमदो के महाल दारचा दंगमा, तहसील लाहौल, जिला लाहौल एवं स्पिति में टशी ज्ञालछन दर्ज है। उपरोक्त दोनों नाम मेरे ही 2220 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 पति के हैं। अब प्रार्थिया राजस्व अभिलेख पटवार वृत्त दारचा सूमदो के महाल दारचा दंगमा, तहसील लाहौल, जिला लाहौल एवं स्पिति में अपने पति का नाम टशी ज्ञालछन उर्फ टशी लाज्ञाल करवाना चाहती है। इस सन्दर्भ में क्षेत्रीय अभिकरण की रिपोर्ट के माध्यम से हस्ब छानबीन एवं ब्यानात वाशिन्दगान देह के पाया गया ै कि टशी लाज्ञाल और टशी ज्ञालछन एक ही व्यक्ति के नाम हैं।

अतः इस नोटिस द्वारा आम जनता एवं सम्बन्धित रिश्तेदारों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को पटवार वृत्त दारचा सूमदो के महाल दारचा दंगमा में टशी ज्ञालछन के स्थान पर टशी ज्ञालछन उर्फ टशी लाज्ञाल दर्ज करने में कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह इस अदालत में दिनांक 04-07-2022 तक असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है। अन्यथा मुताबिक क्षेत्रीय अभिकरण की रिपोर्ट के आधार पर प्रार्थिया के पति का नाम पटवार वृत्त दारचा सूमदो के महाल दारचा दंगमा में टशी ज्ञालछन के स्थान पर टशी ज्ञालछन उर्फ टशी लाज्ञाल दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।

आज दिनांक 04-06-2022 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, तहसील लाहौल, जिला लाहौल एवं स्पिति (हि0 प्र0)।

-------

ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) जय नन्द पुत्र श्री दया राम, निवासी गांव नैली, डा0 गुराण, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--राजस्व रिकार्ड में नाम दुरुस्ती बारे जेर धारा 37(2) के तहत आवेदन-पत्र ।

जय नन्द पुत्र श्री दया राम, निवासी गांव नैली, डा0 गुराण, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) ने एक आवेदन मय शपथ-पत्र इस आशय के साथ गुजारा है कि मेरा नाम प्रत्येक कागजात में जय नन्द ही दर्ज है। लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के रिकार्ड महाल नलवागी में जय चन्द दर्ज हो गया है। जिसको की मैं दुरुस्त करके जय चन्द के बजाये जय नन्द ही दर्ज करवाना चाहता हूं।

अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा सर्वसाधारण जनता व हितबद्ध व्यक्तियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि उपरोक्त नाम को दुरुस्त करने बारे किसी भी व्यक्ति को कोई आपाि हो तो वह दिनांक 30-06-2022 को या इससे पूर्व अधोहस्ताक्षरी के समक्ष असालतन या वकालतन उपस्थित होकर अपनी आपाि दर्ज कर सकता है। इसके पश्चात्‌ कोई भी एतराज काबिले समायत नहीं होगा तथा आवेदन-पत्र पर नियमानुसार कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 19-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।2221 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) केशव राम पुत्र श्री भीमे राम पुत्र मायका, निवासी सत्यावली, डा0 घन्यार, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--राजस्व रिकार्ड में नाम दुरुस्ती बारे जेर धारा 37(2) के तहत आवेदन-पत्र ।

केशव राम पुत्र श्री भीमे राम पुत्र मायका, निवासी सत्यावली, डा0 घन्यार, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) ने एक आवेदन मय शपथ-पत्र इस आशय के साथ गुजारा है कि मेरे पिता का नाम आधार कार्ड, पंचायत रिकार्ड व अन्य कागजात में भीमे राम दर्ज है। लेकिन भू-राजस्व विभाग मुहाल समलवास के रिकार्ड में जेठू दर्ज है। जिसको की मैं दुरुस्त करके जेठू के बजाये भीमे राम दर्ज करवाना चाहता हूं। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा सर्वसाधारण जनता व हितबद्ध व्यक्तियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि उपरोक्त नाम को दुरुस्त करने बारे किसी भी व्यक्ति को कोई आपाि हो तो वह दिनांक 30-06-2022 को या इससे पूर्व अधोहस्ताक्षरी के समक्ष असालतन या वकालतन उपस्थित होकर अपनी आपाि दर्ज कर सकता है। इसके पश्चात्‌ कोई भी एतराज काबिले समायत नहीं होगा तथा आवेदन-पत्र पर नियमानुसार कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 19-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, तहसील बालीचौकी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

-------

समक्ष मेघना गोस्वामी, तहसीलदार एवम्‌ सहायक समाहर्ता, प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

मिसल नम्बर : 79/2022 तारीख मरजुआ : 16-06-2022 तारीख पेशी : 20-07-2022 श्री त्रिलोक चन्द पुत्र श्री मिनकू पुत्र तवारसू, निवासी गांव फतरैण, डाकघर गंगोटी, तहसील . . प्रार्थी। लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . फरीकदोयम। दरख्वास्त बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती।

उपरोक्त उनवान वाला मुकद्दमा में प्रार्थी श्री त्रिलोक चन्द पुत्र श्री मिनकू पुत्र तवारसू, निवासी गांव फतरैण, डाकघर गंगोटी, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) नेे इस अदालत में दिनांक 16-06-2022 को प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत करते हुए अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र में निवेदन किया है कि प्रार्थी का वास्तविक नाम त्रिलोक 2222 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 चन्द है परन्तु प्रार्थी का नाम राजस्व अभिलेख मुहाल फतरैण में तरलोक चन्द ही दर्ज हो चुका है। जोकि गलत दर्ज हुआ है। प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र के समर्थन में अबाहन पत्र तलबाना, नकल शजरा नस्ब, स्व घोषणा पत्र, आधार कार्ड व परिवार नकल भाग-1 साथ संलग्न कर रखे हैं। अब प्रार्थी ने अपने नाम की दुरुस्ती के आदेश चाहे हैं।

अतः इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से सर्वसाधारण आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को राजस्व अभिलेख फतरैण में प्रार्थी का नाम तरलोक चन्द के स्थान पर त्रिलोक चन्द पुत्र मिनकू पुत्र तवारसू, निवासी गांव फतरैण, डाकघर गंगोटी, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0) दुरुस्ती करने बारा कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 20-07-2022 को 10.00 बजे प्रातः इस अदालत में हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। बसूरत गैरहाजिरी एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर नाम दुरुस्ती दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।

यह इश्तहार आज दिनांक 16-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- तहसीलदार एवं सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

---------

समक्ष मेघना गोस्वामी, तहसीलदार एवम्‌ सहायक समाहर्ता, प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

मिसल नम्बर : 77/2022 तारीख मरजुआ : 01-06-2022 तारीख पेशी : 06-07-2022 श्री हरमिंदर सिंह पुत्र श्री शेर सिंह पुत्र लखू, निवासी गांव चिढ, डाकघर गोलंवा, तहसील लडभड़ोल, . . प्रार्थी। जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . फरीकदोयम। दरख्वास्त बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती।

श्री हरमिंदर सिंह पुत्र श्री शेर सिंह पुत्र लखू, निवासी गांव चिढ, डाकघर गोलंवा, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) नेे इस अदालत में दिनांक 31-05-2022 को प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत करते हुए अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र में निवेदन किया है कि प्रार्थी का वास्तविक नाम हरमिंदर सिंह है परन्तु प्रार्थी का नाम राजस्व अभिलेख मुहाल चिढ में हरविन्द्र ही दर्ज हो चुका है। जोकि गलत दर्ज हुआ है। प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र के समर्थन में अबाहन पत्र तलबाना, नकल शजरा नस्ब, स्व घोषणा पत्र, आधार कार्ड, शिक्षा प्रमाण-पत्र व परिवार नकल साथ संलग्न कर रखे हैं। अब प्रार्थी ने अपने नाम की दुरुस्ती के आदेश चाहे हैं। अतः इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से सर्वसाधारण आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को राजस्व अभिलेख मुहाल चीढ में प्रार्थी का नाम हरविन्द्र के स्थान पर हरमिंदर सिंह पुत्र शेर सिंह पुत्र लखू, निवासी गांव चिढ, डाकघर गोलंवा, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0) दुरुस्ती करने बारा कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 06-07-2022 को 10.00 बजे प्रातः इस अदालत में हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। बसूरत गैरहाजिरी एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर नाम दुरुस्ती दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।2223 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 यह इश्तहार आज दिनांक 01-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- तहसीलदार एवं सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

---------

समक्ष मेघना गोस्वामी, तहसीलदार एवम्‌ सहायक समाहर्ता, प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

मिसल नम्बर : 78/2022 तारीख मरजुआ : 01-06-2022 तारीख पेशी : 06-07-2022 श्रीमती कमला देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री संत राम पुत्र घुमिया, निवासी गांव कथौण, डाकघर पंजालग, . . प्रार्थिया। तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . फरीकदोयम। दरख्वास्त बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती।

श्रीमती कमला देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री संत राम पुत्र घुमिया, निवासी गांव कथौण, डाकघर पंजालग, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) नेे इस अदालत में दिनांक 31-05-2022 को प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत करते हुए अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र में निवेदन किया है कि प्रार्थिया का वास्तविक नाम कमला देवी है व प्रार्थिया के पति का वास्तविक नाम संत राम है परन्तु प्रार्थिया का नाम राजस्व अभिलेख मुहाल कथौण व मुहाल बडा ठाण में गोजरी व प्रार्थिया के पति का नाम शकित्या ही दर्ज हो चुका है। जोकि गलत दर्ज हुआ है। प्रार्थिया ने अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र के समर्थन में अबाहन पत्र तलबाना, नकल शजरा नस्ब, स्व घोषणा पत्र, आधार कार्ड, पैन कार्ड, मृत्यु प्रमाण-पत्र व परिवार नकल साथ संलग्न कर रखे हैं। अब प्रार्थिया ने अपने व अपने पति के नाम की दुरुस्ती के आदेश चाहे हैं।

अतः इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से सर्वसाधारण आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को राजस्व अभिलेख मुहाल कथौण व मुहाल बडा ठाणा में प्रार्थिया का नाम गोजरी के स्थान पर गोजरी उपनाम कमला देवी व प्रार्थिया के पति का नाम शकित्या के स्थान पर शकित्या उपनाम संत राम पुत्र घुमिया, निवासी गांव कथौण, डाकघर पंजालग, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) दुरुस्ती करने बारा कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 06-07-2022 को 10.00 बजे प्रातः इस अदालत में हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। बसूरत गैरहाजिरी एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर नाम दुरुस्ती दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।

यह इश्तहार आज दिनांक 01-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- तहसीलदार एवं सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।2224 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 जून 2022/07 आषाढ़, 1944 समक्ष मेघना गोस्वामी, तहसीलदार एवम्‌ सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

मिसल नम्बर : 79/2022 तारीख मरजुआ : 09-06-2022 तारीख पेशी : 06-07-2022 श्री पृथी पाल उपनाम पृथी सिंह पुत्र श्री भगत राम पुत्र रेलू, निवासी गांव कफलौण, तहसील . . प्रार्थी। लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . फरीकदोयम। दरख्वास्त बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती।

श्री पृथी पाल उपनाम पृथी सिंह पुत्र श्री भगत राम पुत्र रेलू, निवासी गांव कफलौण, तहसील लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) नेे इस अदालत में दिनांक 31-05-2022 को प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रस्तुत करते हुए अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र में निवेदन किया है कि प्रार्थी का वास्तविक नाम पृथी पाल उपनाम पृथी सिंह है परन्तु प्रार्थी का नाम राजस्व अभिलेख मुहाल कफलौण में पृथीपाल सिंह ही दर्ज हो चुका है। जोकि गलत दर्ज हुआ है। प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना-पत्र के समर्थन में अबाहन पत्र तलबाना, स्व घोषणा पत्र, शिक्षा प्रमाण-पत्र, आधार कार्ड व परिवार नकल भाग-1 साथ संलग्न कर रखे हैं। अब प्रार्थी ने अपने नाम की दुरुस्ती के आदेश चाहे हैं। अतः इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से सर्वसाधारण आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को राजस्व अभिलेख कफलौण में प्रार्थी का नाम पृथीपाल सिंह के स्थान पर पृथी पाल उपनाम पृथी सिंह पुत्र भगत राम पुत्र रेलू, निवासी गांव कफलौण, तहसील लडभडोल जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0) दुरुस्ती करने बारा कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 06-07-2022 को 10.00 बजे प्रातः इस अदालत में हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। बसूरत गैरहाजिरी एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर नाम दुरुस्ती दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।

यह इश्तहार आज दिनांक 04-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- तहसीलदार एवं सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, लडभड़ोल, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

----------

ब अदालत डॉ0 गणेश ठाकुर, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम वर्ग, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)

मिसल नं0 : /2020 तारीख मजरूआ : 07-05-2022 तारीख पेशी : 20-08-2022 लुकेश कुमारी पत्नी बलवन्त सिंह, निवासी गांव झाल, डाकघर पधीयूँ, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0)।

बनाम

आम जनता

प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 13 (3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण एवं नाम दुरुस्ती बारे।

वादिया लुकेश कुमारी पत्नी बलवन्त सिंह, निवासी गांव झाल, डाकघर पधीयूँ, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0) ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र दायर किया है कि उसकी पुत्री साक्षी परमार पुत्री श्री बलवन्त सिंह जिसकी जन्म तिथि 09-10-2011 है तथा जो नगर परिषद्‌ मण्डी के रिकार्ड में दर्ज है के जन्म प्रमाण-पत्र में उसका नाम लाकेश लिखा है जोकि गलत है परन्तु उसका असली नाम लुकेश कुमारी है जैसा कि परिवार रजिस्टर ग्राम पंचायत, स्कूल प्रमाण-पत्र आदि में दर्ज है जिसे उसकी पुत्री साक्षी परमार के जन्म प्रमाण-पत्र नगर परिषद्‌ मण्डी वर्तमान नगर निगम मण्डी में सही लुकेश कुमारी दर्ज करने के आदेश जारी किये जावें।

अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 20-08-2022 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात्‌ कोई आपत्ति प्राप्त न होने पर एक पक्षीय कार्यवाही की जायेगी।

आज दिनांक 07-05-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

डॉ0 गणेश ठाकुर, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम वर्ग, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी (हि0 प्र0)।

--------

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi (H. P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Rajat Sharma s/o Sh. Ramesh Sharma, r/o H. No. 245/5, Near Civil Hospital Mandi, P.O. Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

2. Smt. Neha Sharma d/o Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, V.P.O. Nerchowk, Tehsil Balh, . . Applicants. District Mandi (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Sh. Rajat Sharma s/o Sh. Ramesh Sharma, r/o H. No. 245/5, Near Civil Hospital Mandi, P.O. Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.) and Smt. Neha Sharma d/o Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, V.P.O. Nerchowk, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi (H.P.) [at present wife of Sh. Rajat Sharma s/o Sh. Ramesh Sharma, r/o H. No. 245/5, Near Civil Hospital Mandi, P.O. Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.)] have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 01-12-2021 according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses Mandi, District Mandi (H.P.) and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 01-07-2022 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.

Issued today on 01st day of June, 2022 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi (H. P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Devansh Sharma s/o Sh. Daleep Kumar Sharma, r/o Near Housing Board Colony, P.O. Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

2. Smt. Ankita Sharma d/o Sh. Shiv Kumar Sharma, r/o Lower Barol, P.O. Dari, Tehsil . . Applicants. Dharamshala, District Kangra (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Sh. Devansh Sharma s/o Sh. Daleep Kumar Sharma, r/o Near Housing Board Colony, P.O. Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.) and Smt. Ankita Sharma d/o Sh. Shiv Kumar Sharma, r/o Lower Barol, P.O. Dari, Tehsil Dharamsala, District Kangra (H.P.) [at present wife of Sh. Devansh Sharma s/o Sh. Daleep Kumar Sharma, r/o Near Housing Board Colony, P.O. Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.)] have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 23-01-2022 according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses Mandi, District Mandi (H.P.) and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 01-07-2022 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi (H. P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Ashok Kumar s/o Sh. Rajender Kumar, r/o Village Panjethi, P.O. Talyahar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

2. Smt. Parveen d/o Sh. Ved Pal Singh, r/o H. No. 789, Sector-45, Burali, P.O. Burali, . . Applicants. Chandigarh

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Sh. Ashok Kumar s/o Sh. Rajender Kumar, r/o Village Panjethi, P.O. Talyahar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.) and Smt. Parveen d/o Sh. Ved Pal Singh, r/o H. No. 789, Sector-45, Burali, P.O. Burali, Chandigarh [at present wife of Sh. Ashok Kumar s/o Sh. Rajender Kumar, r/o Village Panjethi, P.O. Talyahar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.)] have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 30-04-2021 according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses Mandi, District Mandi (H.P.) and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 02-07-2022 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.

Issued today on 03rd day of June, 2022 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

ब अदालत कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी अम्ब, जिला ऊना (हि0प्र0)

श्री संजीव कुमार पुत्र श्री मेहर सिंह, वासी गांव प्रताप नगर अम्ब, तहसील अम्ब, जिला ऊना (हि0 प्र0)।

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--शादी पंजीकरण प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करने बारे।

श्री संजीव कुमार पुत्र श्री मेहर सिंह, वासी गांव प्रताप नगर अम्ब, तहसील अम्ब, जिला ऊना (हि0 प्र0) ने एक दरख्वास्त प्रस्तुत की है जिसमें उसने लिखा है कि उसकी शादी श्रीमती पूनम देवी पुत्री श्री महिंद्र सिंह, वासी गांव पाम्बडा, उप-तहसील गगरेट स्थित कलोह, जिला ऊना (हि0 प्र0) में दिनांक 22-01-2022 को मुताबिक हिन्दू रीति-रिवाज के साथ हुई है का पंजीकरण किया जाकर उसे शादी प्रमाण-पत्र दिया जावे।

अतः इस नोटिस के माध्यम से समस्त जनता तथा सम्बन्धित रिश्तेदारों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को शादी पंजीकरण बारे कोई एतराज/आपत्ति हो तो वह दिनांक 16-07-2022 को प्रातः 10.00 बजे या उससे पहले असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर अदालत होकर अपनी स्थिति/एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है। निश्चित तिथि पर कोई एतराज प्राप्त न होने की सूरत में प्रार्थी को शादी पंजीकरण प्रमाण-पत्र जारी कर दिया जायेगा। अतः बाद में कोई उजर काबिले समायत न होगा।

आज दिनांक 06-06-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ है।

मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/-

कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी,

अम्ब, जिला ऊना (हि0 प्र0)। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है।