Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 56/07/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 8th January 2007 .
that an Whereas , the Government are of opinion industrial dispute exists between Smt. Sinda Percy Jacob , Proprietress , Crystal Gas Agencies (Bharat Gas Distributors) , Jubily Road.
Perinthalmanna , Malappuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri P. Bhaskaran , Poothiyil Veedu, Perinthalmanna P.O. , Malappuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute he referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period ofthree moaths .
ANNEXURE
Whether the alleged denial of employment to Sri P. Bhaskaran, Loading Worker, Crystal Gas Agencies , Jubily Road, Perinthalmanna by its employer is justifiable ? If not what relief is he entitled to get ?
(2)
G.O. (Rt. ) No. 141/07/LBR. Thirunananthapuram, 16th January 2007 .
Whereas, the Goverament are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Sivagiri Sree Narayana Medical Mission Hospital, Varkala P. O .. Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by General Hospital Employees Congress , Head Office , Mukhathala P.O., Kollam-691 577 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; Secretary, Kerala Private
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication :
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Trihural, Kollam. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Sri "Whether the management is justified in rolling back the retirement age from 60 to 55 years? Whether the termination of service of the following 20 employees are justifiable? (1) Sri Hariharan, (2) Sri Vasukurty Nair, ( 3) Sri Abdul Salam, (4) Raghavan, S. , (5 ) Sri Ramakrishnan, (6) Smt . Rajamma, (7) Smt . Kunjulekshmi , (8) Smt, Sukunthala , (9 ) Smt. Chandra- vally, ( 10) Smt . Nalinakshy, (11) Sri R. Shaj , ( 12) Sri G. Vijayan, ( 13) Sri G.Prasannan, ( 14) Sri Babu, R. , (15 ) Smt. Sobhan kumari , ( 16) Sunt . Ramani , (17) Smt. Seetha, ( 18) Smt . Indira , (19) Smt . Vasantha , (20) Smt . Thulasi , if not, what relief they are entitled to?
(3)
G. O. (Rt .) No. 218/07/LBR .
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th January 2007 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Chief Executive Officer , Grassim Industries Ltd., P. O. Mavoor , Kozhikode and the worknthe workman of the above referred establishment Sri R. Sudhakaran , Amina Veedu, Surya Nagar , Kavalottukonam , Perukavu Post, Thiruvananthapuram , Pin-695 573 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether Sri R. Sudhakaran is a worker under the management of Grassim Industries Ltd. , Mavoor, Kozhikode ? If so termination of his employment with effcet from 16-11-2005 is justifiable ? If so what relief he is entitled
(4)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 245/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd January 2007 .
P. O. Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Foster Marketing Company. Peringandur, Athani . Thrissur-680 581 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the President, Foster Employees Union, Varayidom , Thrissur -680 547 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Andwhereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
cxercise of the powers Now, therefore, in conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be refered for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the demand of the worker for 20% bonus for the year 2004-05 is justifiable? Ifnot what the quantum of bonus they are entitled?
(5)
G. O. (RL ) No. 246/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram , 23rd January 2007.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists betweeneen The ManagtagManaging Director, Sun Teck Tyres , (P) Ltd. , Peringavu P.O. , Thiruvampady, Thrissur andthe workman of the above referred establishment represented by Sri Jose Chalissery, President, Sun Teck Tyres Workers Federation, Southern Shopping Complex, Veliyannur, Thrissur-2 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order :
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad, The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Sri C. M. Vasu, Assistant Operator M/s Sun Teck Tyres , Peringavu by the management is justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?
(6)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 248/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23ed January 2007.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispudispute exists between the Managing Director, E. T. M. Ouzhadha Sala, Velayanad, Vellangalloor Pin-680 662 and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. Subhashini Padmanabhan, Vettiyattil Veedu, Veppoor , Varantharappilly . Thrissur-680 303 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANKEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Smt. Subhashini Padmanabhan, General Worker from M/ s E. T. M. Ouzhadhasala (India)( India Lad.. Vellangalloor by the managemett justifiable? If not what relief is she is entitled to get ? is
(7)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 817/ 07/ LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 26th March 2007.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute existsexists between Smi . T. V. Jameela w/o. T.V. MuhMuhammad, Managing Partner, Laila Petroleum (Indian Oil Dealer) Kaithavalappil Veedu, Thazhepalam , Tirur and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri T. G. Vinodan, Tuppaichowattil House, Chirackal , Thanoor P.O. , Malappuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Andwhereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947 ) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURB
Whether the denial of employment to Sri T. C. Vinodan , Attender ofan, Attender of Laila Petroleum ( Indian Oil Dealer) Thazhepalam, Tirurby the management is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get?
(8)
G.O. (Rt. ) No. 822/ 07/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 26th March 2007 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Dileepkumar, ao Ramadas , Thattayamkandi Veedu, Areekkad P. O. , Nallalam , Kozhikode and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri K. Sivasankaran Nair, Rose Villas Perambra P. O , Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order:
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exeraise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) (c) of the Industrix I DisputesAct of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months ,
ANNEXURB
Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Sivasankaran Nairby the manage- ment of Sangam Theatre, Perambra with effect from 1-1-2006 is justifiable ? If not , what relief the worker is entitled to?
(9)
G.O. (At.) No. 897/07/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 4th April 2007 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Factory Manager , Common Wealth Trust India Ltd. , Tile Factory, Faroke and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, The Merchantile Employees Association No. 5/2183 , Indira Gandhi Road, Kozhikode- 1. ( 2) Secretary Industrial Labours Organisation, Faroke P.O. , Kozhikode. (3) General Secretory, Com Trust StaffAssociation , Faroke P.O. , Kozhikode in respect ofmatters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( d' of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947 ) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Kozhikode. The IndustrisThe Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months ,
ANKESURE
Whether the office staff of Common Wealth Trust (India) Ltd., Tile Factory, Feroke are cligible for adary and allowances 14-6-2006 to 23-6-2006 on those days the management delayed Lockout ? from
By order of theGovernor , SESYLAPEN, Under Secretary to Government .