Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 3014 /2006/ LBR . Thiruvananthapuram , 30th Novembar 2006 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an ndustrialdispute exists between the President , Kannur Jilla Ex -servicemen Multi purpose Co - operative Society Limited, ( C ) 1009 , Pazhayangadi , Kannur and the workmen of the above referred establishment Shri P. V. Sivadasan , s / o . Ramankutty Nampiar Kadambur, P. O. Edakkadu , Kannur Jilla in respect ofmatters mentioned in the annexure to this order!
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication :
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of1947( Central Act XIV of 1947 ) , thethe Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNAXURE
"Whether the dismissal of Sri P.V. Sivadasan, Accountant, Kannur Jilla Ex- servicemen Multi Purpose Co- operative Society Limited, Pazhayangadi by the management is justifiable? relief he is entitled to ?יי If not what
(2)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 3015 /2006/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram , 30th November 2006.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri C. P. Subair s / o . O. B. Abubaker , (Faizal Trading Company) NizaManzil , Perumba, Payyannur P. O.0.. (2) Shri A. Muhammadsali , Ayappathu House, ( Faizal Trading Company ) Perumba , P.O. Payyannur and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri . M. Bhaskaran , s / o . Kunjampu , P. O. Annur , Payyannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order .
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Kannur . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether the denial of terminal benefits to Sri . M. Bhaskaran by the Management of Faizal Trading Company , Perumba , Payyannur is justifiable ? If not, what reljef he is entitled to?"
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 3201/2006/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram , 15th December 2006.
industrial dispute exists between Whereas , the Governmment are of opinion that an the General Secretary , Wayanad Jilla Private Bus Operators Association , Sulthan Bathery , Wayanad District and the workmen of the above referred establish- ment Shri O. K. Pankajakshan , Thodavayual Veedu, Nampirkunnu P. O. , Cheeral, Wayanad District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Goverament it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Kannur . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Shri O.K. Pankajakshan by the management of Wayanad District Private Bus Operator's Association is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
(4)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 3329/LBR/2006 . Thiruvananthapuram, 27th December 2006.
Hotel Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, Pankaj, M.G. Road, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri K. Rajan , Karuna , Edavakkade , Sreekaryam P. O .. Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) theGovernment hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Sri K. Rajan Security guard by the management Hotel Pankaj . Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable or not? If not, what relief is entitled to him?
G.O. (Rt. ) No. 32/2007/LER.
Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd January 2007 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between P. T. Johnkutty, Administrator, Seventh Day Adventist Hospital , Kanniyampuram , PB . No. 451 , Ouappalam- 679 104 and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt. Annamma Aran , Bethesto Worship Centre , Parempadam, Kunnamkulam , Trichur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication :
ANNEXURE
The denial of to employment Smt . AnnammaAnnamma Arun by the management of Seventh D Adventist Hospital, Ottappalam is justifiable ? If not the remedy ? Day what is
(6)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 53 / 2007 /LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2007 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Registrar , University of Kerals, University Office , Thiruvananthapuram and the worker of the above referred establishment Smt . S. Beena , Beena Cottage. Market Road , Attingal in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Kollam. The Labour Court willLabour Court will pass the award within aperiod of three months.
ANNIKURE
"Whether the tertermination of employment of S. Beena, Provisional Grade- II , University of Assistant Kerala, of179 days Thiruvananthapuram from the service of the University after completion service is justifiable ? If not what relief she is (7)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 813 / 2007 / LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 26th March 2007.
between the M Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists Manager, Malabar Palace , G. H. Road , Kozhikode and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary , Kozhikode Vanijya Vyavasaya Mazdoor Sangham (BMS ) , Vellodi Building . Kallai Road , Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of the Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947 ) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Kozhikode . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether the employees of Malabar Palace , G.H. Road, Kozhikode are eligible for revision of their pay and allowance ? If so , to what extent ? "
(8)
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 814 /2007 /LUR. Thiruvananthapuram , 26th March 2007 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Laffarge Roofing ( India) Pvt. Ltd. , Faroke P.O. , Kozhikode and the workmenworkmen of the above referred Tub Worker establishment representedby the General Secretary Union (CITU) , Cheruvannoor ,Cherus Faroke P.O .. Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is Opinion of necesary to referrefe the said industrial dispute for adjudication
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Act XIV ofof 1947) the of 1947 ( Central Act Government hereby direct that thesaid industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court,Kozhikode.Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to S/ Shri (1) Sandeep , (2) Sudheeshby the manage ment of Laffarge soofing (India) Pvt . Ltd., Faroke with effect justifiable ? If not , entitled to ? 23-5-2005 from what relief they are
(9)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 815 / 2007 / LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 26th March 2007 Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the General Manager , Xavier Press , Kozhikode C/ o. Bishop House , Malappararabu , Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred cl ahove referred establishmentestablishment Sri R. Carlose , Ransi Villa, Kuzhikkand , Parambu , Nadakkavu P. O., Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Andwhereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said badustrial dispute for adjudication
Now, therefore , in axercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a pariod of three months.
ANNEXURE
"Whether there is any denial of employment to Sri R. Carlose by the Management of Xavier Press , Kozhikode ? If so , what relief he is entitled to ? " .
By order of the Governor , SUSY EAPEN, Under Secretary to Government .