Rcg. No. 1, KL/TV/ (N)/12/2006-2008 Geverament of Kerala
കേരള സർക്കാർ 2007
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
Vol. LII
No.
11th September 2007 2007 സെപ്ററംബർ 11
36
നമ്പർ THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , TUESDAY തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ
52
; } }
20th Bhadra 1929 1929 2018 20
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred byby sectionsect 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
G.O.(Rt) No. 1997/2007/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007 .
ANNEXURE
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager , Gundumalai Tea Estate, Mannar P. O. , Idukki
"Whether the dismissal from service of Sri Durairaj , P. F. No. 2447by the Manage- ment of Gundumalai Tea Estate, Munnar is justifiable ? If not, what relief he entitled to ? is
(2) G.O. (Rt.) No. 1998/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
District and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by The President, Devikulam Estate Workers Union ( AITUC) , Munnar P. O. , Idukki District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Accelerated Freeze Drying Company (Ltd.) , Ezhupunna P. O., Cherthala and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by The Generaleneral SecretaSecretary, A. F. D. C. Employees Union , Ezhupunn P.O. , Cherthala- 688 548 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
170
KERALA GAZETTE
[PART I And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exeexercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of thethe Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
"Whether the dismissal from service of Smt. Velankanni, P. F. No. 2480 and Sri Ramar , P. F. No. 2646 workers of Lockheart Estate, Devikulam is justifiable ? Ifnot, what are the relief entitled to them? " "Whether the Demands of the A. F. D. C. Employees Union , Ezhupunna P. O. , Cherthala are justifiable ? If so , what reliefs they are entitled to ?"
(5)
(3)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 2001/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007 .
G. O. (Rt .) No. 1999/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram , 23rd June 2007 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Smt . Rajeswari Rajendran, Bhakthapriya' , House No. 7, Sterling Gardens, Near Kathrukadavu , Overbridge, Kaloor, Kochi-17 and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri Sajan, P. G. , Kattuparambil House, Kuzhimattom P. O. , Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Whereas, theGovernment are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Nagarjuna Herbal Concentrates Ltd., Alakode, Kalayanthani P. O. , Thodupuzha, Idukki District and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri K. Radhakrishnan, Alappurath Kizhekka Puthenveedu , Cherupoika P.O. , Puthoor, Kottarakkara, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudicarion ;
of Government And whereas , in the opinion it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bysection 10 ( 1)(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947 ) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether the denial of employment to Sri P. G. Sajan, Office Assistant, in Raju Dairy by the management is justifiable ? Ifnot, what relief hehe is entitled to ?" "Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Radhakrishnan , Branch - in -charge , Kottarakkara of M/s Nagarjuna Herbal Concentrates Ltd. , Alakode , Kalayanthani P.O.. Thodupuzha, Idukki with effect from 22-4-2004 is justifiable ? If not , what relief the worker is entitled to ?"
(6) G. O. (Rt.) No. 2002/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
(4) G. O. (Rt.) No. 2000/2007 /LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
ofthe Whereas, the Government are of opinion that anindustrial dispute exists between Sri K. T. Mathew, Kalpana House , Palampra P. O. , Kanjirappally and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri RajanAntony, s / o K. K. Antony, Puthenpurackal, Palampra P. O. , Kanjirappally in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
are of opinion Whereas, the Government that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Lockheart Estate, Devikulam P.O. , Idukki District and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union ( AITUC ) , Munnar P.O., Idukki District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Idukki . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
11th SEPT . 2007 ]
ANNEXURE
"Whether the denial of Rubber Tapping to Sri Rajan Antony, Rubber Tapper by the employer Sri K. T. Mathew is justifiable ? Ifnot, what relief workmen is entitled to ?"
(7)
G. O. (Rt .) No. 2003/2007 /LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Jose, Emprayil , Mukkali, Palampram P. O. , Kottayam and the workmen of the above referred establish- ment representedby the Secretary, All Kerala Rubber Tappers Association ( AKRTA ) , Mukkali Unit, Palampra P. O. , Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Idukki . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURB
"Whether the denial ofwork to Sri P.P. Raju, Rubber Tapper by Sri Jose , Emprayil employer, isis justifiable?justifiable ? If not, what relief theworkmen is entitled to ?
(8)
G.O (Rt. ) No. 2004/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Jose Sunil (Regd. Owner), KL2- R- 5155 , J. R. Travels, VayalilVa Veedu, Vadakkumbhagamchery, Eravipuram P.O. , Kollam, (2) Sri George Joseph ( Operating Owner) , KL2-R-5155, J.R. Travels , ( Mukthyarkaran of Jose Sunil) Vayalil Vecdu, Vadakkumbhagamchery, Eravipuram P. O. , Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri Reghunathan, Bunglow Veedu, Eravipuram P.O. , Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Governinent it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Koilam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
KERALA GAZETTE
171
ANNEXURE
"Whether the termination of employment of Sri P. Reghunathan, Driver , KL- 2-R-5155 J. R. Travels is justifiable ? Ifnot, what relief he is entitled to ? "
(9)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 2005/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram , 23rd June 2007.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between thehe President, Thazhava Central Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangham (Ltd. ) Q- 134 (D) (APCOS) , Manappally North P.O. , Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri Sureskumar , Kollayil House, North East Thazhava, Manappallylly P. O. , Kollam District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order :
Andwhereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be refered for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
"Whether the termination of Sri N. Suresh- Kumar, Milk Tester/ Office Assistant by the management of M/s . Thazhava Central Ksheerolpadaka Co- operative Society Ltd. No. 134 (D) (APCOS) is justifiable? If not, what reliefhe is entitled to ? "
(10)
G.O. (Rt. ) No. 2006/2007 /LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007 .
Whereas , the Government arc of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Boyce Rubber Estate Private Ltd. , Mundakka yam P. O. and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary , Highrange Estate Thozhilali Union, Reg . No. 170/70, Peermade P. O. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power! conferredby section 10 ( 1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Idukki . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Kunjumole, Remani , Surendran and Ponnamma Bai by the management of M/ s . Boyce Rubber Estate Pvt . Ltd. Mundakkayam is justifiable ? If not, what reliefthey are entitled to ? "
(11)
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2007 /2007/ LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager , TheAlappey Company Ltd. , P.B. No 2602 , Alappuzha and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri R. Murali , Mundukattil Veedu , Punnapra P. O. , Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication :
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
"Whether the dismissal from service of Sri R. Murali , Production Assistant, Alleppey Company Ltd. (Mundukattil Veedu, Punnapara P. O. , Alappuzha) by the management isjustifiable ? Ifnot , what relief he is entitled to ? "
(12)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 2016/2007/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram , 26th June 2007.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Hotel Pankaj , Statue , Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the President, Thiruvananthapuram Luxury Hotels Employees Union , ( CITU) , Reg . No. 50/82, Motor Bhavan , T. C. 28/2763, Kuthira- Kunnumpuram , G. P. O. , Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; vattom Road,
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether the termination of service of Smt . P. Chandrika , House Keeping Supervisor and Sri Somasekharan , T. Bellman by the Management of Hotel Pankaj , Statue, Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ? If not , what relief they are entitled to ? "
By order of the Governor , SUSY EAPEN, Under Secretaryto Government.