Government of Kerala
Reg . No. രജി . നമ്പർ
KL/TV(N)/ 12/2006-2008 കേരള സർക്കാർ 2008
GOVERNMENT OF KERAL!
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററV
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
25th November 2008
Vol . LIII
No.
2008 നവംബർ 25
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , TUESDAY
47
നമ്പർ തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ
വാല്യം 53
4th Agrahayana 1930 1930 അഗ്രഹായനം 4
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
ANNEXURE
Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. ( Rt.) No. 2177/2008/ LBR..
to Whether the denial of employment Shri Nandakumar , K. , Pharmacy Assistant, by the management of M/ s . Divine Medical Centre Limited is justifiable? If not , what relief he is entitled to ?
Thiruvananthaparam, 8th August 2008 .
(2)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 2178 /2008 /LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 8th August 2008.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Divine Medical Centre Limited, Vadakkanchery P. O. , Thrissur- 680 582 and the workmen of thethe above referred establishment repre- sented by the General Secretary , Kerala Hospital Employees Sangh (B. M. S. ) , Vivekananda Road, Thiruvampady, Thrissur- 680 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is mecessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Goverament hereby direst that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists berween The Group Manager , Harrisons Malayalam Limited , Mooply Valley Estate , Palappilly P. O. , Thrissur District and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by (1) The General Secretary , Palappilly Rubber Estate Workers Congress ( CITU ) , Palappilly P. O.- 680 304, (2) TheGeneral Secretary , Palappilly Rubber Estate Labour Congress ( INTUC) , Palappilly P. O..680 304, (3) The General Secretary , Kerala State Estate and Plantation Workers Union (TUCI ) , Lakshmi Nilayana Lodge , Alagappa Nagar P. O. - 680 302 , (4) The General Secretary , Rubber Estate Workers Union (AITUC) , Palappilly P. O. , Thrissur -680 304 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to thisorder;
Andwhereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sectionsection 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers. conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal wili pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE
Whether the claim for permanency of the following 17 temporary workers of Kairali Estate , Padagiri , Nelliyampathy is justifiable ?
Elam Division
1. Jyothilakshmi d/ o Jayaveeran
2. Rajeswari dio Nehru 1. Whether alleged unilateral wage reduction for new marking for tapping from 7 days wages to 2 days wages in the same side and 3 days wages for opposite side, per block by the management of Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Mooply Valley Estate are justi- fiable ? If not what relief the workers are entitled to get ?
3. Vadivukkarassi dio Thirunavakkarasu
4. Poomkodi do Nehru
5. Ramakrishnan s/ o Muthayya
6. Palmani dio Thankamuthu
7. Thenmezhi dio Periya Swami 2. Whether Unions' demand for enhancement ofnumber of weightment sheds are justi- fiable ? If yes , what are the remedial measures to be taken by the management ?
8. Nagajyothi dio Periyakaruppan
9. Sumesh s / o Thakamuthu
10. Velmurughan s/ o Ayyaswami
11. Meenakshi djo Ayyaswami
12. Vijaya d/ o Karuppannan
Office Division
3. Whether alleged unilateral work load enhancement in controlled upward tapping (CUT) from 130 rubber trees to 400 treesby the management of Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Mooply Valley Estate is justifiable? If not, what relief the workers are entitled to get?
13. Saju
14. Gowri
15. Vinu s /o Velayudhan
16 Babu So Velayudhan
17. Sindu d/ o Mani
(4)
G.O. (Rt . ) No. 2463 /2008/LBR.
4. Whether alleged unilateral work load enhancement in rain guarding work and connected work , preparation for rain guarding and bitumen pasting etc. by the management of Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Mooply Valley. Estate justifiable ? If not , what relief the workers are entitled to get ? are
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th September 2008.
5. Whether ron renewal of temporary workers list from workers dependents as per the existing settlement and practice and giving temporary work on contract basis by denying employment to temporary workers are justifiable ? If not what are the remedial measures to be taken by the Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Mooply Valley Estate management ?
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Partner, Rosanto Tile Factory , Marathakkara P. O. , Ollur, Thrissur and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by The General Secretary, OllurOllur Mekhala Ottu Company Thozhilali Union, Avinissery P. O. , Thrissur- 680 313 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
(3)
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2179 /2008/ LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 8th August 2008 .
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between ( 1 ) The Manager , Kairali Estates & Exports Private Limited , Padagiri Post, Palakkad-678 509 , ( 2) The Managing Director , Kairali Estates & Exports Private Limited , Padagiri Post, Palakkad- 678 509 and the workmen of the above referred establishment representedby Shri K. J. Francis, General Secretary, KeralaKeral Plantation Workers Union (CITU) , Nelliyampathy, Palakkad -678 511 in respect ofmatters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Whether the dismissal of Sri K. K. Ravi by the management of Rosanto Tile Works . Marathakkara is justifiable ? If not whit relief he is entitled to get ?
(5)
(7) G.O. (Rt .) No. 2468/ 2008/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 18th September 2008.
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 2464/2008/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 18th September 2008.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion an industrial dispute exists between The Corporate General Manager , Kairali Heritage Riverside Resort , Kattampalli , Kannur- 670 603 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by The General Secretary , Kannur District Vanijya Vyavasaya Mazdoor Sangh ( BMS ) Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; that
that an Whereas, the Government are of opinion exists between industrial dispute (1) Shri P. K. Muhammadali , Puthiya Veettil , Nattika Beach P. O. , Thrissur District, (2) Smt . K. A. Sheeja , Proprietor , Afiya Medicals , Thriprayer , Nattika P. O. , Thrissur - 680 566 and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala Hotel and Shop Workers Union (TUCI ) , Thekkarayil Plaza , Shornur Road, Thrissur - 1 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said indusirial dispute for adjudication ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refcr the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central ActAct XIV of 1947 ) the Government hereby direct thatthat the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Shri . K. Vinod by the employer , Kairali Heritage Riverside Resort , Kattampalli, Kannur is justifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to ?
Whether the denial of employment to Shri P. V. Prasad by the Management of M/s Afiya Medicalsicals isis justifiablejustifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to get ?
(8)
(6)
G.O. (Rt . ) No. 2496/2008/LBR . Thiruvananthaparam, 20th September 2008 .
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2467/2008 / LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 18th September 2008 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager , FCI, District Office , Palakkad and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri T. P. Shanmughan, Parachathampotta , Karadu Paramb P. O. , Farokh College via , Malappuram- 673632 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Travancore Cochin Chemicals Limited, Udyogamandal , Ernakulam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by 1. The General Secretary, T. C. C. Thozhilali Union, Udyogamandal , 2. The General Secretary , T. C. C. Employees Association , Udyogamandal , 3. The General Secretary , T.C.C. Employees Union ( INTUC) , Udyogamandal , 4. The General Secretary, T.C.C. Staff & Workers Association (AITUC ) , Udyogamandal , 5. The General Secretary , T. C.C. Employees Organisation in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial Disputebe referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the alleged denial of employment to Shri Shanmughan by the Management of FCI is justifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to get ?
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) theGovernment hereby direct that the sail industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether Shri P. R. Vikraman , workman of Travancore Cochin Chemicals Limited, Udyogamandal is eligible to get promotion to the grade of Senior Assistant with effect from 21-11-2007 ? (2) Whether the workman is entitled to get his pay refixed with effect from 21-6-1996 in Parity with his junior Shri M. J. Sabu ? ( 3 ) Other related benefits if any, entitled to him ?"
(9)
G.O. (Rt .) No. 2578/2008/ LBR .
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th October 2008 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The General Manager, Precot Meridian Limited, ' C' Unit , Chandrapuram , Valayar Dam P. O. , Palakkad- 678 624 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri R. Jayaprakash s /o Raman , Thekkekkad House , Alamballam , Kalleppully, Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to thisthis orderorder ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) theGovernment hereby direct that the said Industrial Dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Shri R. Jayaprakash (T. No. 447) , Operator , Precot Meridian Limited, 'C' Unit , Chandrapuram due to an allegation of sexual harassment of a female teenaged employee in the 3rd shift is justifiable ? If not what relief he is entitled to get ?
By order of the Governor, K. CHANDRAN , Under Secretaryto Gorerument .