Servants of Knowledge
Kerala Gazette · Government of Kerala

Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

Published 13 January 2009

Department
Labour and Rehabilitation(A) Department
Part
PART - I Notification and Orders issued by the Government
Identifier
in.gazette.kerala_new.2009-01-13.part1_part1
Languages
English, Malayalam
Published at
Original source ↗

C

Reg. No актив AL TV ( N )/ 12/2009-2011 Government of Keral

2009

KERALA GAZETTE

കേരള ഗസറാ്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്‌ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

Vol . LIV

No.

13th January 2009 2009 ജനുവരി 13

2 വാല്യം 54

നമ്പർ {

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ

23rd Pousha 1930 1930 21 23

PART I

Notifications and Orders Issued by the Government

ANNEXURE

Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

1. Whether the termination of employment to Shri P. K. Ullas by the management ofM/ s . С.К. К. М. Pharmaceuticals , Thripuni- thura is justifiable or not ?

(1)

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

G.O. (Rt . ) No. 1826/2008/LBR . Thiruvananthaparam, 7th July 2008 .

(2)

G. O. ( Rt . ) No. 2597/2008/LBR .

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th October 2008 .

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri K. S. Chandran, M/ s . C. K. K. M. Pharmaceu- ticals, Thripunithura -682 341 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri P. K. Ullas, Peedikapparambil House , Hill Palace Road, Thripunithura in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

Whereas, theGovernment are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, M/s . Boyce Rubber Estates (P) Limited, Mundakkayam and the workmen of the above referred establishment representedby the General Secretary, Hill Range Estate Employees Association (CITU) , 35th Mile , Mundakkayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Ernakulam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947 ) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Shri K. K. Lakshmanan , C. R. No. 726 by the management of Boyce Eastate is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2600/2008/LBR.. Thiruvananthapuram, 6th October 2008 .

Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager and Chairman , Unyanthala Eapen Memorial Public School, Eraviperoor P. O. , Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta District and the workman ofthe above referred establishment Shri Mathews Oomman, Unyanthala Veedu, Eraviperoor P. O. , Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Shri Mathews Oomman , Transport - cum Security-in -charge , O. E. M. Public School , Eraviperoor by the management is justifiable ? If not, what relief he entitled to ? is

(4)

G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2689/ 2008/ LISK. Thiruvananthapuram, 17th October 2008 .

Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri K. Raman , (Contractor T. S. No , 47, Keerippara , Parali Range) , Pacheni House , Kottappally , Kongadu P. O. , Palakkad , 2. Sri P. K. Chandran ( Contractor T. S. No. 47 , Keerippara , Parali Range) , Puzhackal House, Manickassery P. O. , Kongadu via , Palakkad and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri M. A. Appukuttan s /o Andy, Mattimal House , Manickassery P. O. , Kongadu via , in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Palakkad Andwhereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the alleged denial of employment to Shri M. A. Appukuttan, Toddy Tapper , Toddy Shop No. 47, Keerippara of Parali Range by the Contractors Shri K. Raman & Shri P. K. Chandran is legal ? if not what relief he is entitled to ?

(5) G. O. (Rt .) No. 2682/2008/ LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 17th October 2008 .

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. The Presiden, Fishermen Welfare Society, Pallipurayidam , Moothakkara , Gutcherry P. O. , Kollam - 13 , 2. The Chief Executive Officer & Secretary Pallipurayidam , Moothakkara, Cutcherry Р. О. , Kollam- 13 and the workmen of the above reterred establishment Shri D. Thomas , Jasmine Villa Resettlement Colony , Snehatheeram Nagar - 8 , Port Kollam-691 006 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1 ) ( c ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court wili pass the award within a period of three months .

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Shri D. Thomasf worker from service by the management o Fishermen Welfare Society, Moothakkara Cutcherry P. O. , Kollam- 13 with effect from 3-12-2007 is justifiable ? If not , what relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(6) GO . (Rt . ) No. 2683 /2008/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 17th October 2008 .

Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Kerala State Bamboo Corporation Limited Angamaly and the workman of the above referred , establishment represented by the President , Kerala State Bamboo Corporation Depot Thozhilali Union ( INTUC) , Reg . No. 07/43/1993 , State Committee , Angamaly-683 572 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order :

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

3th. JAN. 20091

KERALA GAZETTE

5

Ramachandran , General Secretary , Rubber Crumb Workers Union ( CITU) , CITU Jilla Committe Office,, KSRTC Building , Desabhimani Road , Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) theGovernment hereby direct that the said Industrial Dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Ernakulam . The Labour Court pass the award within a period of three months . will

ANNEXURE

And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

to proper 1. Whether the punishment awarded Shri P. N. Mohanan without enquiry resulting in wage reduction 2/3 and working days by half is justifiable or not ? of

2. If not , what relief he is catitled to ?

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Ast XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .

ANNEXURE

(7)

G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2684 /2003 / LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 17th October 2008.

of Whether the termination of Shri G. Rajeev , Grade-V, Worker by management Ponmudi Rubbers Limited is justifiable or not? If not , what is the relief the is entitled to get ?

By order of the Governor , Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between. The Managing Director, Ponnudi Rubbers Limited, Rubber Board Regional Office, Thycadu , Thiruvanantha- puram and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by Shri Mannaram

K. CHANDRAN , Under Secretary to Government .

Cite this issue. Kerala Gazette, Government of Kerala, 13 January 2009. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.kerala_new.2009-01-13.part1_part1/. Archive identifier in.gazette.kerala_new.2009-01-13.part1_part1.